UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 40-F

[   ] REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OR
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13(a) OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 Commission File Number: 001-31965

TASEKO MINES LIMITED
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

British Columbia 1040 Not Applicable
(Province or Other Jurisdiction of (Primary Standard Industrial (I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization) Classification Code) Identification No.)

15 th Floor – 1040 West Georgia Street
Vancouver, British Columbia
Canada V6E 4H1
(778) 373-4533
(Address and telephone number of Registrant’s principal executive offices)

Corporation Service Company
Suite 400, 2711 Centerville Road
Wilmington, Delaware 19808
(800) 927-9800
(Name, address (including zip code) and telephone number (including
area code) of agent for service in the United States)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act:

Title Of Each Class Name Of Each Exchange On Which Registered
Common Shares, no par value NYSE MKT

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None

For annual reports, indicate by check mark the information filed with this Form:
[X] Annual Information Form            [X] Audited Annual Financial Statements

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the Registrant’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report: 221,867,138 Common Shares as of December 31, 2016

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X]            No [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes [   ]            No [   ]


INTRODUCTORY INFORMATION

Taseko Mines Limited (the “ Company ” or “ Taseko ”) is a Canadian public company whose common shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange and the NYSE MKT Exchange (the “ NYSE MKT ”). Taseko is a “foreign private issuer” as defined in Rule 3b-4 under Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “ Exchange Act ”), and is eligible to file this annual report on Form 40-F (the “ Annual Report ”) pursuant to the multi-jurisdictional disclosure system (the “ MJDS ”).

PRINCIPAL DOCUMENTS

The following documents that are filed as exhibits to this annual report are incorporated by reference herein:

Document Exhibit No.
Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “ AIF ”) 99.5
Audited consolidated financial statements of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, including the report of independent registered public accounting firm with respect thereto (the “ Audited Financial Statements ”) 99.6
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “ MD&A ”) 99.7

NOTE TO UNITED STATES READERS REGARDING DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN UNITED STATES AND CANADIAN REPORTING PRACTICES

International Financial Reporting Standards

The Company is permitted under the MJDS to prepare this Annual Report in accordance with Canadian disclosure requirements, which are different from those of the United States.

The Company’s Audited Consolidated Financial Statements that are incorporated by reference into this Registration Statement have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“ IFRS ”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (the “ IASB ”).

DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls and procedures are defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act to mean controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and includes, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.


- 2 -

Management’s Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, our management carried out an evaluation, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e), were effective as at December 31, 2016.

See “Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting and Disclosure Controls and Procedures” on page 25 of the MD&A incorporated herein by reference.

INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the issuer’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the issuer’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) for the Company.

With the participation of the CEO and CFO, management carried out an evaluation of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as at December 31, 2016. In making this evaluation, the Company’s management used the framework established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).


- 3 -

Based upon this evaluation, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as at December 31, 2016.

A copy of management’s report on the effectiveness of our internal controls is included under “Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting” on page 3 of our Audited Consolidated Financial Statements incorporated herein by reference.

Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Company is required to provide an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm on internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016. In this report, the Company’s auditor, KPMG LLP, must state its opinion as to the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016. KPMG LLP has audited the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting and has issued an attestation report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016 which is included in our Audited Consolidated Financial Statements incorporated herein by reference.

No Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Annual Report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

NOTICES PURSUANT TO REGULATION BTR

The Company did not send any notices required by Rule 104 of Regulation BTR during the year ended December 31, 2016 concerning any equity security subject to a blackout period under Rule 101 of Regulation BTR.

AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE

The disclosure provided under “Composition of Audit and Risk Committee” on page 78 of our AIF incorporated herein by reference. The Company’s Board of Directors has established a separately-designated Audit and Risk Committee of the Board in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act.

AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

The Company’s Board of Directors has determined that Richard Mundie, Geoffrey Burns, and Alex Morrison, members of the Audit and Risk Committee of the Board, are audit committee financial experts (as that term is defined in Item 407 of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act) and are independent directors under applicable laws and regulations and the requirements of the NYSE MKT Exchange.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The disclosure provided under “Principal Accountant Fees and Services” on page 79 of our AIF incorporated herein by reference.


- 4 -

AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE PRE-APPROVAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

The disclosure provided under “Audit and Risk Committee—Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures” on page 80 of our AIF incorporated herein by reference.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

The Company has not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on the Company’s financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues, expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

The disclosures provided under “Commitments and contingencies” on page 16 of our MD&A incorporated herein by reference.

CODE OF ETHICS

The disclosure provided under “Code of Ethics” on page 79 of our AIF incorporated herein by reference. During the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, the Company did not (i) substantively amend its Code of Ethics or (ii) grant a waiver, including any implicit waiver, from any provision of its Code of Ethics with respect to any of the directors, executive officers or employees subject to it.

NYSE MKT CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The Company is subject to corporate governance requirements prescribed under applicable Canadian securities laws, rule and policies. The Company is also subject to corporate governance requirements prescribed by the listing standards of the NYSE MKT, and the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC under the Exchange Act (including those applicable rules and regulations mandated by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002).

Section 110 of the NYSE MKT company guide permits NYSE MKT to consider the laws, customs and practices of foreign issuers in relaxing certain NYSE MKT listing criteria, and to grant exemptions from NYSE MKT listing criteria based on these considerations. A company seeking relief under these provisions is required to provide written certification from independent local counsel that the non-complying practice is not prohibited by home country law. A description of the significant ways in which the Company’s governance practices differ from those followed by domestic companies pursuant to NYSE MKT standards is contained on the Company’s website at www.tasekomines.com The Company’s governance practices also differ from those followed by U.S. domestic companies pursuant to NYSE MKT listing standards in the following manner:

Board Meetings

Section 802 (c) of the NYSE MKT Company Guide requires that the Board of Directors hold meetings on at least a quarterly basis. The Board of Directors of the Company is not required to meet on a quarterly basis under the laws of the Province of British Columbia.


- 5 -

Solicitation of Proxies

NYSE MKT requires the solicitation of proxies and delivery of proxy statements for all shareholder meetings, and requires that these proxies shall be solicited pursuant to a proxy statement that conforms to applicable SEC proxy rules. Since the Company is a foreign private issuer, the equity securities of the Company are exempt from the proxy rules set forth in Sections 14(a), 14(b), 14(c) and 14(f) of the Exchange Act. The Company solicits proxies in accordance with applicable rules and regulations in Canada.

Shareholders Approval for Dilutive Private Placement Financings

Section 713 of the NYSE MKT Company Guide requires that the Company obtain the approval of its shareholders for share issuances equal to 20 percent or more of presently outstanding shares for a price which is less than the greater of book or market value of the shares. This requirement does not apply to public offerings. There is no such requirement under British Columbia law or under the Company’s home stock exchange rules (Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”)) unless the dilutive financing:

(i)

materially affects control of the issuer;

   
(ii)

provides consideration to insiders in the aggregate of 10% or greater of the issuer’s market capitalization or outstanding shares, or a non-diluted basis, where certain conditions are met; and

   
(iii)

is in respect of private placement or an acquisition where the issuer will issue shares in excess of 25% of its presently outstanding shares, on a non-diluted basis.

The Company will seek a waiver from NYSE MKT’s section 713 requirements should a dilutive private placement financing trigger the NYSE MKT shareholders’ approval requirement in circumstances where the same financing does not trigger such a requirement under British Columbia law or under the TSX rules.

The Company believes that there are otherwise no significant differences between its corporate governance policies and those required to be followed by United States domestic issuers listed on the NYSE MKT. In particular, in addition to having a separate Audit and Risk Committee, the Company’s Board of Directors has established a separately-designated Compensation Committee that materially meets the requirements for a compensation committee under section 805 of the NYSE MKT Company Guide, as currently in force.

Copies of the Company’s corporate governance materials are available on the Company’s website at www.tasekomines.com (under the About Us / Corporate Governance tabs). In addition, the Company is required by National Instrument 58-101 of the Canadian Securities Administrators, Disclosure of Corporate Governance Practices , to describe its practices and policies with regard to corporate governance in management information circulars that are furnished to the Company’s shareholders in connection with annual meetings of shareholders.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

Pursuant to Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (“ Dodd-Frank Act ”), issuers that are operators, or that have a subsidiary that is an operator, of a coal or other mine in the United States are required to disclose in their periodic reports filed with the SEC information regarding specified health and safety violations, orders and citations, related assessments and legal actions, and mining-related fatalities under the regulation of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977.


- 6 -

The Company did not have any mines in the United States during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

UNDERTAKING

The Registrant undertakes to make available, in person or by telephone, representatives to respond to inquiries made by the Commission staff, and to furnish promptly, when requested to do so by the Commission staff, information relating to: the securities registered pursuant to Form 40-F; the securities in relation to which the obligation to file an annual report on Form 40-F arises; or transactions in said securities.

CONSENT TO SERVICE OF PROCESS

The Company previously filed an Appointment of Agent for Service of Process and Undertaking on Form F-X signed by the Company and its agent for service of process with respect to the class of securities in relation to which the obligation to file this annual report arises.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the Company certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 40-F and has duly caused this annual report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: March 15, 2017 TASEKO MINES LIMITED
     
   
     
  By: /s/ Stuart McDonald
    Stuart McDonald
    Chief Financial Officer


EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit  
Number Exhibit Description
99.1 (1) Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
99.2 (1) Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
99.3 (1) Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
99.4 (1) Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
99.5 (1) Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2016
99.6 (1) Audited consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2016 and 2015 and the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss, changes in equity, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, including the notes thereto and reports of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm thereon and on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016
99.7 (1) Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016
99.8 (1) Consent of KPMG LLP
99.9 (1) Consent of Scott Jones, P. Eng.
99.10 (1) Consent of Ronald G. Simpson, P. Geo.
99.11 (1) Consent of Keith Merriam, P. Eng.
99.12 (1) Consent of Robert Rotzinger, P. Eng.
99.13 (1) Consent of Greg Yelland, P. Eng.
99.14 (1) Consent of Dan Johnson, P.E., RM-SME

(1) Filed as an exhibit to this Annual Report on Form 40-F



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Russell E. Hallbauer, certify that:

(1)

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Taseko Mines Limited;

   
(2)

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

   
(3)

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

   
(4)

The issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the issuer and have:


  (a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     
  (b)

designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

     
  (c)

evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     
  (d)

disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and


(5)

The issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


  (a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     
  (b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.


Date: March 15, 2017  
     
By: /s/ R. Hallbauer  
Name: Russell E. Hallbauer  
Title: Chief Executive Officer  



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Stuart McDonald, certify that:

(1)

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Taseko Mines Limited;

   
(2)

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

   
(3)

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

   
(4)

The issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the issuer and have:


  (a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     
  (b)

designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

     
  (c)

evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     
  (d)

disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and


(5)

The issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


  (a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     
  (b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.


Date: March 15, 2017  
     
By: /s/ Stuart McDonald  
Name: Stuart McDonald  
Title: Chief Financial Officer  



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Russell E. Hallbauer, Chief Executive Officer of Taseko Mines Limited (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)        The Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)        The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

  By: /s/ R. Hallbauer
     
  Name: Russell E. Hallbauer
  Title: Chief Executive Officer
     
  Date: March 15, 2017

 

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 40-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 40-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Stuart McDonald, Chief Financial Officer of Taseko Mines Limited (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)        The Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)        The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

  By: /s/ Stuart McDonald
     
  Name: Stuart McDonald
  Title: Chief Financial Officer
     
  Date: March 15, 2017

 

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 40-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 40-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.




ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM

 

 

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016

 

AS AT MARCH 15, 2017


TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTORY NOTES 2
Forward-Looking Statements 2
Documents Incorporated by Reference 3
Currency and Metric Equivalents 4
Resource Category (Classifications) Used in this AIF 5
CORPORATE STRUCTURE 8
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF TASEKO’S BUSINESS 9
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS 10
Gibraltar Mine - Technical Information 15
Florence Copper Project 25
Aley Project 36
Prosperity Project 44
RISK FACTORS 54
DIVIDENDS 62
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE 62
Share Capital 62
Senior Notes 62
Secured Credit Facility 63
Ratings 63
MARKET FOR SECURITIES 64
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS 65
Committees of the Board of Directors 66
Principal Occupations and Other Information 66
Cease Trade Orders, Bankruptcies, Penalties or Sanctions 74
Potential Conflicts of Interest 75
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND REGULATORY ACTIONS 76
INTEREST OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS 76
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR 76
MATERIAL CONTRACTS 76
INTERESTS OF EXPERTS 77
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 78
AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE 78
   
FIGURES  
   
FIGURE 1: LOCATION OF TASEKO’S PROPERTIES 12
   
APPENDIX A  
   
Audit and Risk Committee Charter


INTRODUCTORY NOTES

Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Information Form (“AIF”), including the documents incorporated by reference, contain forward-looking statements and forward-looking information (collectively referred to as “forward-looking statements”) which may not be based on historical fact, including without limitation statements regarding our expectations in respect of future financial position, business strategy, future production, reserve potential, exploration drilling, exploitation activities, events or developments that we expect to take place in the future, projected costs and plans and objectives. Often, but not always, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of the words “believes”, “may”, “plan”, “will”, “estimate”, “scheduled”, “continue”, “anticipates”, “intends”, “expects”, and similar expressions.

Such statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and are subject to risks and uncertainties and are necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by the Company, are inherently subject to significant business, economic, competitive, political and social uncertainties and contingencies. Many factors could cause the Company’s actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements that may be expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements, including, among others:


- 3 -

Such information is included, among other places, in the AIF under the heading “Risk Factors”.

Should one or more of these risks and uncertainties materialize, or should underlying factors or assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described in forward-looking statements. Material factors or assumptions involved in developing forward-looking statements include, without limitation, that:

These factors should be considered carefully and readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that the foregoing list of risk factors is not exhaustive and it is recommended that prospective investors carefully read the more complete discussion of risks and uncertainties facing the Company included under “Risk Factors” in this AIF.

Although the Company believes that the expectations conveyed by the forward-looking statements are reasonable based on the information available to it on the date such statements were made, no assurances can be given as to future results, approvals or achievements. The forward-looking statements contained in this AIF and the documents incorporated by reference herein are expressly qualified by this cautionary statement. The Company disclaims any duty to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform such statements to actual results or to changes in the Company’s expectations except as otherwise required by applicable law.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

Incorporated by reference into this AIF are the audited consolidated financial statements, together with the auditors’ report thereon, and Management’s Discussion and Analysis for Taseko Mines Limited (the “Company” or “Taseko”) for the year ended December 31, 2016. The financial statements are available for review on the SEDAR website located at www.sedar.com . All financial information in this AIF is prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board using Canadian dollars.


- 4 -

Currency and Metric Equivalents

The Company’s accounts are maintained in Canadian dollars and all dollar amounts herein are expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise indicated.

The following factors for converting Imperial measurements into metric equivalents are provided:

To Convert from Imperial To Metric Multiply by
     
acres hectares 0.405
feet metres 0.305
miles kilometres 1.609
tons (2,000 pounds) tonnes 0.907
ounces (troy)/ton grams/tonne 34.286

In this AIF, the following capitalized terms have the defined meanings set forth below:

NYSE MKT

The NYSE MKT, formerly known as the NYSE Amex, being one of the two stock exchanges (together with the TSX) on which the Common Shares are listed.

   
ASCu

The weight percentage of copper per unit weight of rock that is acid soluble, including native copper.

   
Common Shares

The Company’s common shares without par value, being the only class or kind of the Company’s authorized capital.

   
Company

Taseko Mines Limited, including its subsidiaries, unless the context requires otherwise.

   
Carbonatite deposit

Carbonatite deposits are igneous rocks largely consisting of the carbonate minerals calcite and dolomite, which contain the niobium mineral pyrochlore, rare earth minerals or copper sulphide minerals.

   
Concentrator

A type of mineral processing facility that converts raw ore from the mine into a metal concentrate that can then be sold to a smelter for further processing.

   
Epithermal Deposit

A mineral deposit formed at low temperature (50-200°C), usually within one kilometre of the earth’s surface, often as structurally controlled veins.



- 5 -

Flotation

Flotation is a method of mineral separation whereby, after crushing and grinding ore, froth created in a slurry by a variety of reagents causes some finely crushed minerals to float to the surface where they are skimmed off.

   
NSR

Net smelter return, a general proxy for the gross value of metals derived from concentrates delivered to a smelter for refining.

   
Mineral Deposit

A deposit of mineralization, which may or may not be ore.

   
Mineral Symbols

Ag – silver; Au – gold; Cu – copper; Pb – lead; Zn – Zinc; Mo – molybdenum; and Nb – niobium.

   
Porphyry Deposit

A type of mineral deposit in which ore minerals are widely disseminated, generally of low grade but large tonnage.

   
Semi-autogenous
Grinding (“SAG”)

SAG mills are essentially autogenous mills, but utilize grinding balls to aid in grinding like in a ball mill. A SAG mill is generally used as a primary or first stage grinding solution.

   
Solvent Extraction/
Electrowinning
(“SX/EW”)

Solvent extraction is the technique of transferring a solute from one solution to another; for example when copper oxide is dissolved into solution, copper becomes the solute. Electrowinning is the process in which an electric current flows between a pair of electrodes (anode & cathode) in a solution containing metal ions (electrolyte). Metal is deposited on the cathode in accordance with the metal’s ability to gain or lose electrons. Since ion deposition is selective, the cathode product is generally high grade and requires little further refining.

   
TSX

The Toronto Stock Exchange, being one of the two stock exchanges (together with the NYSE MKT) on which the Common Shares are listed.

Resource Category (Classifications) Used in this AIF

The discussion of mineral deposit classifications in this AIF adheres to the resource/reserve definitions and classification criteria developed by the Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy in 2005. Estimated mineral resources fall into two broad categories dependent on whether the economic viability of them has been established and these are namely “resources” (economic viability not established) and ore “reserves” (viable economic production is feasible). Resources are sub-divided into categories depending on the confidence level of the estimate based on level of detail of sampling and geological understanding of the deposit. The categories, from lowest confidence to highest confidence, are inferred resource, indicated resource and measured resource. Reserves are similarly sub-divided by order of confidence into probable (lowest) and proven (highest). These classifications can be more particularly described as follows:


- 6 -

A “ Mineral Resource ” is a concentration or occurrence of diamonds, natural solid inorganic material, or natural solid fossilized organic material including base and precious metals, coal, and industrial minerals in or on the Earth’s crust in such form and quantity and of such a grade or quality that it has reasonable prospects for economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade, geological characteristics and continuity of a Mineral Resource are known, estimated or interpreted from specific geological evidence and knowledge.

An “ Inferred Mineral Resource ” is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity and grade or quality can be estimated on the basis of geological evidence and limited sampling and reasonably assumed, but not verified, geological and grade continuity. The estimate is based on limited information and sampling gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes.

An “ Indicated Mineral Resource ” is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape and physical characteristics can be estimated with a level of confidence sufficient to allow the appropriate application of technical and economic parameters, to support mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. The estimate is based on detailed and reliable exploration and testing information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes that are spaced closely enough for geological and grade continuity to be reasonably assumed.

A “ Measured Mineral Resource ” is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape, and physical characteristics are so well established that they can be estimated with confidence sufficient to allow the appropriate application of technical and economic parameters, to support production planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. The estimate is based on detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing information gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes that are spaced closely enough to confirm both geological and grade continuity.

A “ Mineral Reserve ” is the economically mineable part of a Measured or Indicated Mineral Resource demonstrated by at least a Preliminary Feasibility Study. This Study must include adequate information on mining, processing, metallurgical, and economic and other relevant factors that demonstrate, at the time of reporting, that economic extraction can be justified. A Mineral Reserve includes diluting materials and allowances for losses that may occur when the material is mined.

A “ Probable Mineral Reserve ” is the economically mineable part of an Indicated and, in some circumstances, a Measured Mineral Resource demonstrated by at least a Preliminary Feasibility Study. This Study must include adequate information on mining, processing, metallurgical, economic, and other relevant factors that demonstrate, at the time of reporting, that economic extraction can be justified.


- 7 -

A “ Proven Mineral Reserve ” is the economically mineable part of a Measured Mineral Resource demonstrated by at least a Preliminary Feasibility Study. This Study must include adequate information on mining, processing, metallurgical, economic, and other relevant factors that demonstrate, at the time of reporting, that economic extraction is justified. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission require permits in hand or their issuance imminent to classify mineralized material as reserves.

CAUTIONARY NOTE TO UNITED STATES INVESTORS CONCERNING ESTIMATES OF RESERVES AND MEASURED, INDICATED AND INFERRED RESOURCES

The disclosure in this AIF, including the documents incorporated by reference herein, uses terms that comply with reporting standards in Canada and certain estimates are made in accordance with Canadian National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”). NI 43-101 is a rule developed by the Canadian Securities Administrators that establishes standards for all public disclosure an issuer makes of scientific and technical information concerning mineral projects. Unless otherwise indicated, all reserve and resource estimates contained in or incorporated by reference in this AIF have been prepared in accordance with NI 43-101. These standards differ significantly from the requirements of the SEC, and reserve and resource information contained herein and incorporated by reference herein may not be comparable to similar information disclosed by U.S. companies.

This AIF includes mineral reserve estimates that have been calculated in accordance with NI 43-101, as required by Canadian securities regulatory authorities. For United States reporting purposes, SEC Industry Guide 7 (under the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)), as interpreted by Staff of the SEC, applies different standards in order to classify mineralization as a reserve. As a result, the definitions of proven and probable reserves used in NI 43-101 differ from the definitions in the SEC Industry Guide 7. Under SEC standards, mineralization may not be classified as a "reserve" unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve determination is made. Among other things, all necessary permits would be required to be in-hand or their issuance be imminent in order to classify mineralized material as reserves under the SEC standards. Accordingly, certain mineral reserve estimates contained in this AIF may not qualify as “reserves” under SEC standards, unless expressly stated to so qualify.

In addition, this AIF uses the terms “measured mineral resources”, “indicated mineral resources” and “inferred mineral resources” to comply with the reporting standards in Canada. We advise investors that while those terms are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the SEC does not recognize them. Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of the mineral deposits in these categories that are not already classified as “reserves” will ever be converted into mineral reserves. These terms have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility.

Further, “inferred resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and as to whether they can be mined legally or economically. Therefore, Investors are also cautioned not to assume that all or any part of the inferred resources exists. In accordance with Canadian rules, estimates of “inferred mineral resources” cannot form the basis of feasibility or other economic studies.


- 8 -

It cannot be assumed that all or any part of “measured mineral resources”, “indicated mineral resources”, or “inferred mineral resources” will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part of the reported “measured mineral resources”, “indicated mineral resources”, or “inferred mineral resources” in this AIF that are not already classified as “reserves” is economically or legally mineable.

In addition, disclosure of “contained ounces” in respect of resources that do not qualify as reserves is permitted disclosure under Canadian regulations; however, the SEC only permits issuers to report reserves in ounces and requires other mineralized material to be reported as in place tonnage and grade without reference to unit measures.

For the above reasons, information contained in this AIF and the documents incorporated by reference herein containing descriptions of our mineral deposits may not be comparable to similar information made public by U.S. companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements under the United States federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.

CORPORATE STRUCTURE

Taseko Mines Limited was incorporated on April 15, 1966, pursuant to the Company Act (British Columbia). This corporate legislation was superseded in 2004 by the British Columbia Business Corporations Act which is now the corporate law statute that governs us . Our registered office is located at Suite 1500, 1055 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6E 4N7, and our head office is located at Suite 1500, 1040 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6E 4H1.

The following is a list of the Company’s principal subsidiaries:

  Jurisdiction of Incorporation Ownership
Gibraltar Mines Ltd. 1 British Columbia 100%
Aley Corporation British Columbia 100%
Curis Resources Ltd. 2 British Columbia 100%
Curis Holdings (Canada) Ltd. 2 British Columbia 100%
Florence Copper Inc. 2 Nevada 100%

1. Taseko owns 100% of Gibraltar Mines Ltd., which owns 75% of the Gibraltar Joint Venture
2. Taseko owns 100% of Curis Resources Ltd., which owns 100% of Curis Holdings (Canada) Ltd., which owns 100% of Florence Copper Inc.


- 9 -

Gibraltar Joint Venture

On March 31, 2010, we established by two contracts an unincorporated joint venture (“JV”) between Gibraltar Mines Ltd., and Cariboo Copper Corp. (“Cariboo”) over the Gibraltar copper and molybdenum mine (the “Gibraltar Mine”), whereby Cariboo acquired a 25% interest in the Gibraltar Mine and we retained a 75% interest with Gibraltar Mines Ltd. operating the mine for the two JV participants. Under the related Joint Venture Formation Agreement (“JVFA”), the Company contributed to the Joint Venture substantially all assets and obligations pertaining to the Gibraltar Mine, and Cariboo paid the Company $187 million to obtain its 25% interest in the JV. Gibraltar Mines Ltd. continues to be the operator of the Gibraltar Mine under the Joint Venture Operating Agreement which is filed at www.sedar.com . Cariboo is a Japanese consortium jointly owned by Sojitz Corporation (50%), Dowa Metals & Mining Co., Ltd. (25%) and Furukawa Co., Ltd. (25%).

GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF TASEKO’s BUSINESS

Taseko is a Vancouver, B.C. headquartered mining company that has been focused on the operation of the Gibraltar Mine, and on the development of the New Prosperity gold and copper project, the Aley Niobium project, and the Florence Copper project. All of these properties are located in British Columbia, Canada except for the Florence Copper project which is located in Arizona. The following is a summary of the development of our business over the last three financial years:

2014

The second concentrator at the Gibraltar Mine, which completed commissioning in March 2013, completed its first full year of operations.

On February 26, 2014, the Minister of the Environment announced her conclusion that the New Prosperity project is likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects. The Minister referred the matter to the Governor in Council who decided that those effects are not justified in the circumstances and accordingly the mine could not proceed.

On March 26, 2014, the Company filed an application for judicial review in Federal Court, seeking to quash (invalidate) the decisions of the Minister and Governor in Council communicated on February 26, 2014. The Company also sought a declaration that certain sections of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act , 2012, are in whole or in part beyond the powers of the Federal government under the Constitution Act, 1867.

In September 2014, the Company announced a NI 43-101 compliant reserve estimate for the Aley Niobium project of 84 million tonnes grading 0.50% Nb 2 O 5 . The reserve estimate is documented in a technical report entitled “Technical Report on Mineral Reserves at the Aley Project” dated October 30, 2014, prepared by Scott Jones, P.Eng., Keith Merriam, P.Eng., Greg Yelland, P.Eng., Robert Rotzinger, P.Eng., and Ronald G. Simpson, P.Geo.


- 10 -

On November 20, 2014, the Company acquired a 100% interest in the Florence Copper Project though the acquisition of Curis Resources Ltd. (“Curis”). The aggregate value of the consideration for the acquisition of Curis was approximately $85 million inclusive of debt assumed. The Florence Copper Project is an in-situ copper recovery and solvent extraction/electrowinning project located near the town of Florence in central Arizona, USA.

2015

In May 5, 2015, the Company completed an updated mine plan for the Gibraltar Mine featuring a 50% decrease in strip ratio and a reduced cut-off grade, achieving an overall reduction in copper production costs with a slightly lower amount of copper produced. The new mine plan was a result of a detailed, six-month engineering study and forms the basis of an updated NI 43-101 compliant reserve. The reserve estimate is documented in a technical report entitled “Technical Report on Mineral Reserve Update at the Gibraltar Mine” dated June 15, 2015, prepared by Taseko and Gibraltar Mine staff under the supervision of Scott Jones, P.Eng., a Qualified Person under NI 43-101.

On January 14, 2015, the British Columbia Minister of Environment granted the Company a five-year extension to the New Prosperity Environmental Assessment Certificate.

2016

The two remaining permits required for construction and operation of the Florence Copper production test facility were issued in August and December 2016, respectively.

On February 12, 2016, Taseko announced that it had filed a civil claim in the B.C. Supreme Court against the Canadian federal government. The claim seeks damages in relation to the February 26, 2014 decision of the Minister of the Environment concerning the New Prosperity Project in that the Government of Canada and its agents failed to meet the legal duties that were owed to Taseko and that in doing so they caused and continue to cause damages, expenses and loss to Taseko.

Taseko has been proceeding with its request to amend the British Columbia environmental assessment certificate for the New Prosperity Project. In addition, Taseko has filed a Notice of Work (“NOW”) with the Ministry of Energy & Mines which will allow the Company to gather information to advance mine permitting under the Mines Act of British Columbia.

2017

On January 16, 2017, the Company announced that completed technical work on the Florence Copper Project has resulted in a significant improvement in project economics. The results are described in the report titled “NI 43-101 Technical Report, Florence Copper Project, Florence, Pinal County, Arizona” dated February 28, 2017, prepared by Dan Johnson, P.E., RM-SME, a Qualified Person under NI 43-101, and is filed on www.sedar.com.

On February 27 2017, the Company announced that it has entered into a US$33 million streaming agreement with Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd (“Osisko”) for Taseko’s 75% share of payable silver production from the Gibraltar Mine. Under the terms of the streaming agreement, Taseko has received an upfront deposit of US$33 million for 100% of its share of Gibraltar payable silver production until 5.9 million ounces have been delivered. After that threshold has been met, 35% of Taseko’s share of all future silver production will be delivered to Osisko. Osisko will pay US$2.75 per ounce for all the silver deliveries made under the streaming agreement. Additionally, Osisko has been granted warrants for three million common shares of Taseko with a strike price of $2.74 per common share. The warrants will expire on April 1, 2020.


- 11 -

The two Judicial Reviews initiated by Taseko were heard in federal court over a five day period in the week of January 30, 2017 for the New Prosperity Project. Both Judicial Reviews focus on the fundamental principles of administrative and procedural fairness. Taseko alleged that the Government of Canada, through the conduct of the environmental assessment and the decisions which resulted from it, failed in its obligation to uphold those fundamental principles. A decision is expected from the federal court within six to nine months.

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Taseko is a mining company that seeks to acquire, develop, and operate large tonnage mineral deposits which, under conservative metals price assumptions, it believes are potentially capable of supporting a mine for 10 years or longer.

Our principal business activity is operating the Gibraltar Mine and advancing our other projects to a production decision. In recent years, we have expanded the Gibraltar Mine ore concentrator, added a second ore concentrator, increased the mining fleet and made other production improvements at the mine. Our business is focused on the production of copper and molybdenum from the Gibraltar Mine and on securing environmental permits for the proposed Florence Copper Project, Aley Niobium Project and the New Prosperity gold and copper project. The Company also owns the Harmony gold project, an exploration stage gold property on BC’s West Coast.

All projects are operated solely by Taseko directly or through subsidiaries and are 100% owned, except the Gibraltar Mine which is 75% owned.

The map below highlights the location of the Company’s four properties in British Columbia, Canada and one property in Arizona, USA:


- 12 -

Principal Products and Competitive Conditions

Taseko’s assets include reserves and resources in a diverse range of metals including copper, molybdenum, gold and niobium. Demand for these metals fluctuates in tandem with general global economic conditions.

Taseko’s strategy has been to grow the Company by utilizing cash flow from the Gibraltar Mine to assemble and develop a pipeline of projects. We continue to believe this will generate the best, long-term returns for shareholders. Total expenditures on projects in 2016 consisted of $5.0 million at the Florence Copper project, $1.7 million on New Prosperity, and $0.8 million on the Aley Project.

Following a period of mine expansion and capital expenditure, Gibraltar has now achieved a stable level of operations and the Company’s focus is on further improvements to operating practices to reduce unit costs. Improvement of operating costs were due to cost control initiatives which were implemented during 2015, including mine plan modifications, workforce reductions and vendor initiatives. During September 2016, the molybdenum circuit at Gibraltar was successfully restarted, and will continue to contribute by-product credits in future periods.

A long-term off-take agreement, signed in the fourth quarter of 2015, has resulted in lower treatment and refining costs. Under the agreement, the Company has committed to sell 600,000 tonnes of Gibraltar copper concentrate (approximately 50% of expected production) through to the end of 2020. The Company also entered into a long-term fixed rate ocean freight contract in early 2016.


- 13 -

During 2016, volatility of commodity prices has continued, with notably stronger copper prices in late 2016.

The average price of London Metals Exchange (“LME”) copper was US$2.39 per pound in the fourth quarter of 2016, which was 11% higher than the third quarter of 2016 and about 8% higher than the fourth quarter of 2015.

The Canadian dollar exchange rate has continued to remain at a substantial discount to the US dollar. A weak Canadian dollar contributes to improved operating margins at Gibraltar as approximately 80% of mine operating costs are paid in Canadian dollars.

Environmental Protection Requirements

Taseko’s mining, exploration and development activities in Canada are subject to various levels of Canadian Federal and British Columbia Provincial laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. Similarly, the Florence Copper Project is subject to various levels of US Federal and Arizona State laws and regulations relating to protection of the environment. All of the jurisdictions include requirements for closure and reclamation of mining properties as part of their regulatory framework.

The total liability for reclamation and closure cost obligations as calculated for financial disclosure purposes, at December 31, 2016 was $98.5 million. This amount represents the present value of the estimated future costs of planned and anticipated closure and remediation activities, assuming a pre-tax discount rate of 2.3% and an inflation rate of 2%.

Environmental and Sustainability Policy

Taseko is committed to continual improvement towards the protection of human health and the stewardship of the environment. Taseko recognizes that responsible environmental management is critical to our success and has committed that it will:


- 14 -

Taseko is a member of the Mining Association of Canada and the Mining Association of British Columbia. Both of these organizations require members to participate in a program known as Towards Sustainable Mining (“TSM”) which encourages companies to work towards best management practice standards through self-regulation and reporting on key performance areas. These areas include:

In 2015, Taseko and Gibraltar’s performance and reporting on performance in all of the areas was verified by an external auditor as being at a level of industry best practice. Further details can be found on the Taseko website.

Employees

As at December 31, 2016, the Company had the following employees and contractors:

Location Full-time Salaried Hourly (Unionized) Contractors
Vancouver 19 - -
Gibraltar 145 478 3
Florence, USA 6 - 2
Total 170 478 5

Occupational Health and Safety Policy

Taseko provides safe and healthy working conditions, and to establish operating practices which safeguard employees and physical assets.

To achieve this goal, the Company commits to:


- 15 -

For the third straight year (2016), Gibraltar has received the John Ash Safety Award presented by the Ministry of Energy and Mines. This prestigious award goes to the mining operation in British Columbia with the lowest injury-frequency rate that has worked at least one million hours during the year.

Gibraltar Mine - Technical Information

Current Technical Report

Unless stated otherwise, information of a technical or scientific nature related to the Gibraltar Mine contained in this AIF (including documents incorporated by reference herein) is summarized or extracted from a technical report entitled “Technical Report on the Mineral Reserve Update at the Gibraltar Mine” dated June 15, 2015 (the “Gibraltar Technical Report”), prepared by Scott Jones, P. Eng. filed on Taseko’s profile at www.sedar.com and updated with production and development results since that time. Mr. Jones is employed by the Company as Vice-President, Engineering and is a “Qualified Person” as defined by Canadian securities regulatory instrument NI 43-101 .

Project Description, Location, and Access

The Gibraltar open pit mine and related facilities are located 65 kilometres north of the town of Williams Lake and are centered at latitude 52 o 30’N and longitude 122 o 16’W in the Cariboo Mining Division. Williams Lake is approximately 590 kms north of Vancouver, British Columbia.

Access to the Gibraltar Mine from Williams Lake is 45 kilometres via Highway 97 to McLeese Lake, and then 20 kilometres by paved road to the mine site.

The Gibraltar Mine property consists of 243 tenures held as summarized in Table 1 below.

Table 1: Mineral Tenures – Gibraltar Mine

Tenure Type Number Area (ha)
Claims 211 19,795
Leases 32 2,275
Total 243 22,070

There are 32 mining leases at the Gibraltar Mine which are valid until at least October 2033 as long as renewal fees, which are due on an annual basis, are paid. Rights to use the surface accompany each mining lease. There are 211 claims included in the Gibraltar property tenure package. 76 of these claims are due to expire in November 2017, and the remainder are due to expire in May 2021 or later. It is intended that all leases and claims will be renewed prior to their renewal fees being due (in the case of the leases) and prior to their expiry in the case of the claims.


- 16 -

There are several land parcels for which surface rights were purchased outright. There is one fee simple lot at the Gibraltar Mine on which the plant site is located and annual taxes are paid. In addition, the Gibraltar Mine holds three other land parcels.

There are no royalties, overrides, back-in rights, payments or other agreements to which the project is subject.

There are no significant factors or risks that might affect access or title or ability to perform work on the property.

History

In 1964, Gibraltar acquired a group of claims in the McLeese Lake area from Malabar Mining Co. Ltd. Canadian Exploration Limited (“Canex”) and Duval Corporation (“Duval”) had also been exploring on adjacent claims known as the Pollyanna Group. In 1969, Gibraltar, Canex and Duval entered into an agreement providing for the commingling of Gibraltar’s claims with the Pollyanna Group. In 1971, Gibraltar acquired Duval’s remaining interest in the property.

Preliminary development of the Gibraltar Mine began in October 1970. The concentrator commenced production in March, 1972 and was fully operational by April 1972. A cathode copper plant with an annual capacity of 10 million pounds of market-ready copper metal began operation in October 1986.

In October 1996, Westmin Resources Limited (“Westmin”) acquired 100% control of Gibraltar and in December 1997, Boliden Limited Westmin (Canada) Limited (“Boliden”) acquired Westmin. In March 1998, Boliden announced that it would cease mining operations at the Gibraltar Mine at the end of 1998.

In July 1999, Taseko’s subsidiary, Gibraltar Mines Ltd., purchased the Gibraltar Mine assets from Boliden and certain of its affiliates, including all mineral interests, mining and processing equipment and facilities, and assumed responsibility for reclamation obligations.

From 1999 to 2004, Taseko geologists and engineers sought to better define known resources and explored for additional mineralized material. The on-site staff completed on-going reclamation work and maintained the Gibraltar Mine for re-start. Operating and environmental permits were kept in good standing. The mine re-opened in October 2004. Copper cathode production at the SX/EW plant recommenced in January 2006.

The Gibraltar Mine has been owned and operated as an unincorporated joint venture between Taseko and Cariboo since March 31, 2010. The Company’s wholly- owned subsidiary, Gibraltar Mines Ltd. and Cariboo hold 75% and 25% beneficial interests in the Joint Venture, respectively.


- 17 -

Gibraltar increased design mill capacity to 55,000 tons per day in 2011. Gibraltar further increased design mill capacity to 85,000 tons per day in 2013 through installation of a complete independent second concentrator and a stand-alone Molybdenum Separation Plant.

Total production since 1972 is 557 million tons of ore producing 2.9 billion pounds of copper in concentrate, 102 million pounds of cathode copper and 32 million pounds of molybdenum.

Geological Setting, Mineralization, and Deposit Types

The Gibraltar deposits are hosted by the upper Triassic Granite Mountain batholith, located within a wedge of Mesozoic and Palaeozoic rocks bounded on the west by the Fraser Fault system and on the east by the Pinchi Fault system. The Granite Mountain Batholith is a composite body consisting of three major phases; Border Phase diorite, Mine Phase tonalite, and Granite Mountain trondjhemite. Contacts between the major phases are gradational over widths ranging from two metres to several hundred metres. The regional deformation was accompanied by localized metasomatic alteration and associated sulphide deposition that led to the concentration of copper mineralization in specific areas of the batholith.

There are currently five defined mineralized zones on the Gibraltar Mine property. They are the Pollyanna, Granite, Gibraltar, Connector, and Extension zones. They occur in a broad zone of shearing and alteration.

Two major ore structure orientations have been recognized; the Sunset and Granite Creek systems. Ore host structures of the Sunset system are mainly shear zones, with minor development of stockworks and associated foliation lamellae whereas oriented stockworks with associated pervasive foliation lamellae predominate in the Granite Creek system.

Pyrite and chalcopyrite are the principal primary sulphide minerals. Small concentrations of other sulphides are present in the Gibraltar ores with molybdenite being a minor but economically important associate of chalcopyrite in the Pollyanna, Granite, and Connector deposits.

Exploration

There has been no material non-drilling exploration conducted on the Gibraltar property since 2000.

A property-scale Induced Polarization (“IP”) geophysical survey was designed and initiated in August 2000. Field activities included 237 kms of line cutting and some 220 kms of IP survey. Several deposit scale anomalies external to current reserves were identified and drill tested in 2003 as described in a report titled “Technical Report on the Gibraltar Mine, British Columbia” by James W. Hendry, P.Eng., and C. Stewart Wallis, P.Geo., dated March 23, 2005, which is filed on www.sedar.com.


- 18 -

Drilling

From 1999 to 2004, Taseko geologists and engineers sought to better define known resources and explored for additional mineralized material. A core drilling program for pit definition for the Granite Lake and PGE Connector deposits and property exploration at the 98 Oxide Zone was carried out between September and November 2005. A further drilling program carried out in 2006 was designed to define the mineral resources between the existing pits by tying together the extensive mineralization zones, and to test for additional mineralization at depth.

The 2007 program tested a number of targets to define further mineralization, provided definition drilling in the Pollyanna-Granite saddle zone and Granite West areas and included condemnation drilling for the proposed extensions of both the #5 and #6 Dump footprints. The targets for further mineralization were Gibraltar South, Pollyanna North IP anomaly, Granite South and the Gunn Zone.

The 2008 exploration program was conducted on the southern and eastern margins of the Gibraltar pit and northwest of the Gibraltar West pit. The objective was to upgrade identified inferred resources to indicated or measured categories through “in-fill” drilling. Holes drilled in the Gibraltar West pit area were incorporated into the 2008 reserve estimate for the new Gibraltar Extension Pit.

The 2010 program was conducted on the northern and western margins of the Gibraltar pit, and one hole on the southwest margin. The objective was to define the ultimate limit of the Gibraltar pit to the north and west. The 2010 drilling program met the objective of delineating mineralization to the north and west of the Gibraltar pit. A total of 28,129 feet was drilled in 34 drill holes in 2010.

The 2011 program was aimed at identifying mineralization down-dip of the Gibraltar and Granite deposits. A total of 12,229 feet were drilled in 5 holes. A deep zone of anomalous copper ± molybdenum mineralization encountered in drill-hole 2011-003 extends from approximately 2,600 to 3,700 feet and consists of intermittent intercepts grading up to 1.3% TCu and 0.4% Mo.

In 2013, there were two drill programs completed, one in the summer and the other in the fall. Both programs targeted the projected mineralization south of the current Granite pit. A total of 38,068 feet in 31 holes were drilled between the two programs. The objective of both programs was to increase the extent of the mineralization within two of the Granite pit pushbacks.

In early spring of 2014, a resource drill program commenced targeting the Connector pit and the area between Gibraltar East and Granite Pit. At the same time a geotechnical drill program was undertaken. A total of 38 holes between the two programs were drilled with a cumulative length of 37,456 feet. The main goals of the drilling programs were (1) to collect high-quality geological, geotechnical and assay data, (2) to improve the geological understanding of the ore body, and (3) to increase the drill density within and confidence level of the resource model.

In late 2015, one exploration drill hole was drilled to expand the current known mineralization northwest of the Extension deposit. The total depth of the hole was 2,507 feet. A significant interval of copper was encountered at above reserve grade. The mineralization to the west, northwest and at depth is open. More drilling is needed to confirm if the Extension pit can be expanded to include this material.


- 19 -

In 2016, two drill programs were completed. The first program targeted the conversion of resource material from inferred to measured/indicated at the Granite and Pollyanna deposits. The program drilling also allowed an improvement of the geological understanding of the ore bodies. This reserve definition program totaled 35 holes with a cumulative length of 29,342 feet. The second program was an exploration program that targeted the extension of the mineralization discovered in the 2015 exploration hole. This program commenced November 5, 2016, and was completed on December 20, 2016, and a total of 7 holes with a cumulative length of 14,432 feet were drilled. The preliminary exploration results received have been positive with the best results to date received from the northwest most hole. The mineralization to the west, northwest and at depth has been expanded with the drilling and remains open in these directions. More drilling is needed to prove up the extent of this mineralization.

Sampling, Analysis, and Data Verification

Over 120,000 samples have been taken for total copper analysis from drilling at Gibraltar since 1965. About 95% of these samples were also assayed for molybdenum, 56% for acid soluble copper, 40% for multi-element ICP and 30% for gold. Essentially all rock drilled and recovered is sampled in 10 ft intervals. Unconsolidated overburden material, where it exists, is generally not recovered by core drilling and therefore not usually sampled.

From discovery in 1965 through mine start-up in 1971, and since mine re-start in 2004, assays on exploration drill samples have been performed by reputable, independent third party analytical laboratories. Mine laboratory personnel performed all exploration drill sample analyses from 1979 to 2003.

Well-documented sample preparation, security and analytical procedures used on the Gibraltar drill programs since 1999 have been carried out in an appropriate manner consistent with common industry practice. The results are supported by many years of mine production. A significant amount of due diligence and analytical QAQC for copper and molybdenum has been completed on the samples that were used in the current mineral resource/reserve estimate. The quality of the work performed on the digital database provides confidence that it is of good quality and acceptable for use in geological and resource modeling of the Gibraltar deposits.

Details of sample preparation, assay laboratories, security, and data verification used in the Gibraltar drill hole sampling and analytical programs is documented in the Gibraltar Technical Report.

Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing

Sulphide ore from the Gibraltar deposits has been processed on-site since 1972 and run of mine oxide ore has been leached since 1986. The current mineral reserves are contained within zones which have been significantly mined, with the exception of the Extension Zone. Metallurgical testing associated with the Extension Zone returned results consistent with the larger ore body.


- 20 -

The basis for predictions of copper concentrate flotation recovery is plant performance data from both of the existing concentrators based on sulphide and oxide content. Copper recovery averages 88% over the remaining operating period of the reserves.

Closed circuit cleaner locked cycle tests on Gibraltar bulk copper concentrate provide recovery values in the range of 90 to 93% at a final molybdenum grade greater than 50%. Applying the predicted molybdenum recovery from the locked cycle tests to the average bulk flotation circuit molybdenum recovery supports the molybdenum recovery of 50% used in economic calculations.

The basis of the predictions of copper cathode produced from heap leaching and subsequent solvent extraction is based upon historical leaching recovery curves. These curves take into account the annual recovery declination from the date of material placement.

Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimates

The Gibraltar Mine mineral resources and reserves are based on the published reserves as of December 31, 2014, as documented in the Gibraltar Technical Report and reflects depletion due to mining in 2015 and 2016.

The reserve estimate uses long-term metal prices of US$2.75/lb for copper and US$11.00/lb for molybdenum and a foreign exchange of C$1=US$0.85.

The proven and probable sulphide reserves as of December 31, 2016, are tabulated in Table 2 below.

Table 2: Gibraltar Mine Sulphide Mineral Reserves at 0.15% Copper Cut-off


Pit

Category
Tons
(millions) (1)
Cu
(%)
Mo
(%)
Connector Proven 153 0.25 0.010
  Probable 14 0.22 0.008
  Subtotal 167 0.25 0.010
Gibraltar Proven 153 0.25 0.009
  Probable 111 0.23 0.008
  Subtotal 264 0.24 0.008
Granite Proven 105 0.27 0.009
  Probable 11 0.25 0.007
  Subtotal 117 0.27 0.009
Extension Proven 50 0.33 0.002
  Probable 1 0.26 0.001
  Subtotal 51 0.33 0.002
Pollyanna Proven 84 0.25 0.007
  Probable 5 0.23 0.003
  Subtotal 89 0.25 0.007
Total   688 0.26 0.008


- 21 -

(1) Totals may not add due to rounding.

There are also oxide reserves as shown in Table 3 below. These oxide reserves are in addition to the sulphide reserves stated in Table 2.

Table 3: Gibraltar Mine – Oxide Mineral Reserves at 0.10% ASCu Cut-off

Pit Category Tons (millions) (1) ASCu (%)
Connector Proven 1 0.15
  Probable 14 0.15
  Subtotal 15 0.15
Gibraltar Proven - 0.00
  Probable 1 0.18
  Subtotal 1 0.18
Extension Proven - 0.00
  Probable - 0.00
  Subtotal - 0.00
Pollyanna Proven - 0.00
  Probable 1 0.12
  Subtotal 1 0.12
Total   18 0.15

(1) Totals may not add due to rounding.

Cautionary Note to Investors concerning estimates of Measured and Indicated Resources

The following section uses the terms “measured” and “indicated resources”. We advise investors that while those terms are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize them. Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all mineral deposits in these categories that are not already classified as “reserves” will ever be converted into reserves.

The resource estimate uses long-term metal prices of US$3.50/lb for copper and US$11.00/lb for molybdenum and a foreign exchange rate of C$1=US$0.90.

The mineral reserves stated in Table 2 above are contained within the mineral resources indicated in Table 4 below:


- 22 -

Table 4: Gibraltar Mine Mineral Resources at 0.15% Copper Cut-off

Category Tons (millions) Cu (%) Mo (%)
Measured 773 0.26 0.008
Indicated 258 0.24 0.007
Total 1,031 0.25 0.008

The mineral resource and reserve estimations were completed by Gibraltar Mine staff under the supervision of Scott Jones, P.Eng., Vice-President, Engineering, a Qualified Person under NI 43-101 and the author of the Gibraltar Technical Report. Mr. Jones has verified the methods used to determine grade and tonnage in the geological model, reviewed the long-range mine plan, and directed the updated economic evaluation.

Mining Operations

The Gibraltar Mine is a typical open pit operation that utilizes drilling, blasting, cable shovel loading and large-scale truck hauling to excavate rock. The Gibraltar Mine is planned for excavation of sulphide mineralized material of sufficient grade that it can be economically mined, crushed, ground and processed to a saleable product by froth flotation.

Rock containing lower grade sulphide mineralization or oxide mineralization is also mined but is not immediately processed. The lower grade sulphide material is stockpiled for later processing in the concentrator. In addition, a portion of the low grade sulphide material and all of the oxide material can be leached with a highly diluted sulphuric acid, which is naturally assisted by bacterial action, and the resultant copper sulphate solution can be processed to cathode copper in the Gibraltar Mine’s SX/EW plant.

The strip ratio over the remaining 23 year operating period of the reserve will average 1.9 strip ratio refers to the ratio of the amount of overburden (or waste material) required to be mined in order to extract a unit of ore. For example, a 3:1 stripping ratio means that mining one tonne of ore will require mining three tonnes of waste rock. While the annual strip ratio generally decreases with time, the strip ratio will vary and be managed over the course of the mine life based on exchange rates, commodity prices, and grade distribution during annual and midrange mine planning process to optimize the economic performance of the operation.

Processing and Recovery Operations

The processing facilities at the Gibraltar Mine consist of two separate bulk sulphide concentrators, a dedicated molybdenum flotation plant, and a series of leach piles which feed a solvent extraction and electrowinning (“SX/EW”) facility.

Run of mine ore is fed to the two sulphide concentrators in parallel at a combined design rate of 85,000 t/day. These two bulk concentrators, while differing in size, follow the same process path. Ore is fed to primary crushing with the product reporting to a closed circuit SAG/Ball comminution stage. Ground ore is processed through a rougher flotation stage. Tailings from the rougher flotation stage are pumped to a storage facility, while the concentrate is reground and processed through two further cleaner flotation stages. Final bulk concentrate contains both copper and molybdenum values.


- 23 -

The bulk concentrate from both facilities is combined and processed through a single molybdenum flotation plant. The bulk concentrate is floated in a rougher stage which depresses the copper values and selectively recovers molybdenum. The underflow from this plant is the site’s final copper concentrate. This copper concentrate is dewatered and shipped in bulk to market. The rougher concentrate is reground and processed through two further cleaner flotation stages. Molybdenum final concentrate from this plant is dewatered and bagged, and subsequently shipped to market. The molybdenum flotation plant was restarted in September 2016 after being idled in July 2015 during a decline in molybdenum prices.

Oxide ore from the mine is delivered to oxide leach dumps. The SX/EW plant is designed to extract copper from the pregnant leach solutions (“PLS”) collected from the site’s leach dumps. Acidic solution is passed through the leach pile and extracts copper in the form of copper ions in this PLS. This copper laden solution is delivered to the SX/EW plant via collection ditches, ponds and pumping where required. The process takes PLS and selectively extracts the copper ions in solvent extraction mixer-settlers. The copper is transferred from this acid solution to an organic phase and finally to a clean electrolyte. The electrolyte is filtered and heated before being passed through the electrowinning cells where the copper is plated out on stainless steel cathodes. The resultant high quality cathode copper is bundled and sold. The barren solution leaving the plant, raffinate, is pumped back to leach additional copper from the leach piles.

Gibraltar’s copper concentrate has an approximately 28% copper content grade and no significant deleterious elements. Gibraltar copper cathode is nominally 99.9%+ pure copper.

Infrastructure, Permitting and Compliance Activities

The Canadian National Railway (“CN”) has rail service to facilitate the shipping of copper concentrates to Vancouver Wharves, owned and operated by Kinder Morgan in North Vancouver, British Columbia. The Company owns and operates the concentrate rail load-out facility on the CN rail line at Macalister, 26 kilometres from the mine site. Electricity is obtained from BC Hydro. Natural gas is provided by Fortis BC. The communities of Williams Lake and Quesnel are sufficiently close to the site to supply goods, services, and personnel to the Gibraltar Mine. The Gibraltar Mine had over 620 active personnel at the end of December 2016. Make-up fresh water for the mine site is obtained from a set of wells on the Gibraltar Mine property. Process facilities operate using reclaimed water from the existing tailings storage facility

Water currently stored in the Gibraltar Pit will be transferred to the completed Granite pit starting in early 2025. This will require the construction of a bulk pit dewatering system.

Relocation of the in-pit crusher feeding concentrator 1 will need to be completed by 2023 prior to starting phase 2 of the Connector Pit.


- 24 -

With the current design parameters and tailings deposition plan, the tailings facility footprint will accommodate tailings storage until at least 2033. It is anticipated that actual tailings deposition performance will enable deposition of all tailings generated in the reserve mine plan within the existing facility footprint.

All material regulatory authorizations and permits are in place to extract the reserves described in this report with the exception of:

Other permit considerations include approvals required for route changes to the access road, hydro transmission line, natural gas line, and water discharge pipeline in order to complete development of the Extension Pit which is scheduled to start in 2032. Approvals will be sought as required.

There have been no material environmental non-compliance incidents since the mine reopened in 2004.

Capital and Operating Costs

As the majority of the mine’s facilities are in place and operating, the only capital requirements are for the relocation of the in-pit crusher/conveyor system and electrical substation, bulk pit dewatering, specific tailings and water discharge related activities, and sustaining capital to maintain the integrity of the mining and processing equipment.

The total anticipated site capital requirements over the next 23 years are summarized in Table 5.

Table 5: Capital Cost Summary

Area Total Capital
(in millions)
Bulk Pit Dewatering $15
Tailings and Water Reclaim/Discharge $4
Crusher Relocation $36
Pit Substation Relocation $3
Road and Gas Line Relocation $5
General Sustaining $221
Total $284

Average estimated unit site operating costs over the next 23 years are summarized in Table 6:


- 25 -

Table 6: Site Operating Cost Summary

Operating Category Life of Mine Cost
Mining cost/ton mined 1 $1.74
Milling cost/ton milled $3.87
General and Administrative cost/ton milled $0.91
Total operating cost/ton milled $9.78

1 Mine cost/ton milled is $5.00 at a strip ratio of 1.9:1

The basis for capital and operating cost estimates are documented in the Gibraltar Technical Report.

Exploration, Development, and Production

Gibraltar is pursuing initiatives to improve recovery, concentrator throughput, and mine cost and productivity. Continued improvement in any or all of these areas will have not only positive economic implications but could increase the size of the reserve pits under current commodity assumptions and/or impact the optimum cut-off grade.

Florence Copper Project

Technical Report

Unless stated otherwise, the information of a technical or scientific nature related to the Florence Copper Project contained in this AIF is summarized or extracted from the technical report entitled “NI 43–101 Technical Report, Florence Copper Project, Florence, Pinal County, Arizona” dated February 28, 2017 (the “Florence Copper Technical Report”) prepared by Dan Johnson, P.E., RM-SME who is a Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101 and filed on www.sedar.com under Taseko’s profile.

Project Description, Location and Access

The Florence Copper Project (or “Florence Copper”) is an advanced-stage oxide copper project controlled 100 percent by Taseko Mines Limited. The project hosts a buried porphyry copper deposit that is amenable to in-situ copper recovery (“ISCR”) and solvent extraction-electrowinning (“SX/EW”) copper production.

Florence Copper is located in the Sonoran Desert of Pinal County in south-central Arizona at latitude 33° 02’ 49” North and longitude 111° 25’ 48” West within the limits of the Town of Florence. The Florence Copper site entrance is 14 miles by paved highway from Interstate 10 and can be accessed from the center of the Town of Florence via 4 miles of highway (AZ-79 and Hunt Highway). The Copper Basin Railway, a federally regulated shortline railroad, is located 100 feet north of Hunt Highway adjacent to the project site and provides rail access between the town of Winkelman and the Union Pacific Railroad at the Magma loading station near Interstate 10.


- 26 -

The Florence Copper property is 1,342 acres and consists of two contiguous parcels of land. Florence Copper owns surface and subsurface rites to 1,182 acres of patented land held in fee simple that includes the majority of the project area. The patented land is subject to annual property taxes and falls within the jurisdiction of the Town of Florence for zoning and land use. Florence Copper also holds Arizona State Mineral Lease 11-26500 that includes approximately 160 acres of surface and subsurface mineral rights on Arizona State Trust Lands, which is not subject to the jurisdiction of the Town of Florence for land use. The Arizona State Mineral Lease term is from December 2013 through to December 2033 and is renewable with Florence Copper having the preferred right to renew thereafter. The mineral lease requires annual rent to be paid to the State of Arizona and includes a royalty requirement on production from the mineral lease land. The Arizona State Mineral Lease is in good standing and the State Trust Lands overlie approximately 42 percent of the targeted copper resource.

There are three separate royalties applicable to Florence Copper. The land subject to Arizona State Mineral Lease 11-26500 is subject to a royalty payable to the State of Arizona based on a percentage (between 2% and 8% according to a “Copper Index Price”) of the gross value of minerals produced. A 3% “Net Returns” royalty on the entire property is payable to Conoco Inc. and a 2.5% “Net Profits Interest” royalty applicable to the patented land is payable to BHP Billiton.

Although there are some limited environmental liabilities on the project site relating to historical mining and exploration activities conducted by previous owners, these are managed by the company and do not pose a risk to access, title or the ability to perform work on the project.

The patented land portion of the project is currently the subject of a legal non-conforming use litigation which may affect the company’s ability to access the portion of the deposit on the patented land. Further legal details are included in the section of this AIF entitled “Legal and Permitting”.

History

The project has had four previous owners whose primary business is exploration and mining development including Continental Oil Company (“Conoco”), Magma Copper Company (“Magma”), BHP Copper Inc. (“BHP”) and Curis Resources Ltd. (“Curis”). BHP conveyed the land constituting the Florence Copper Project to Florence Copper Inc. on May 2000. In the years between 2002 and 2009 the ownership of the private property passed through a number of companies including Roadrunner Resorts LLC, WHM Merrill Ranch Investments LLC, The Peoples Bank, and Merrill Ranch Properties LLC. Ownership of Arizona State Mineral Lease 11-26500 remained with Florence Copper Inc. which was acquired by Felix-Hunt Highway LLC in 2008. Curis purchased the surface rights and all of the mineral rights to the 1,182 acre private land component of the Florence Copper Project in December 2009. In February 2010, Curis obtained assignment of Arizona State Mineral Lease 11-26500 completing the land holdings that form the Florence Copper site. Curis was acquired by Taseko in November 2014.


- 27 -

Conoco discovered the Florence Copper deposit in 1970 while executing an exploratory drilling program southwest of Poston Butte. From 1970 to 1977 Conoco completed approximately six hundred and twenty thousand feet of exploration drilling in 612 drill holes. In 1974, Conoco mined approximately fifty thousand tons of mineralized material from a single-level, underground mine designed to collect sample for metallurgical and geological testing. Metallurgical testing of the recovered material was performed using a small plant built on the property. The mine shafts are now capped at the ground surface and the mine is flooded.

Magma acquired the property from Conoco in July 1992 and initiated a Pre-Feasibility Study to verify the Conoco work and to determine the most effective technology for extracting copper from the deposit. The results from copper resource modeling, metallurgical testing, material property testing, and financial analysis supported the conclusion that the preferred method for development of the property was ISCR and SX/EW to produce cathode copper. Magma also completed approximately 150,000 feet of exploration drilling in 172 drill holes over the period from 1994 to 1996.

In January 1996, Broken Hill Proprietary Company Limited of Australia acquired Magma and created BHP. In 1998, BHP conducted a 90-day field optimization ISCR test to demonstrate hydraulic control, gather copper recovery and other technical data for a feasibility study. The outcome of the study confirmed to regulatory agencies that production wells could be efficiently installed into the mineralized zone, hydraulic control of the injected and process solutions could be maintained and documented, and that the ISCR method was a viable method for copper extraction at Florence Copper. BHP also completed approximately seventeen thousand feet of exploration drilling in 21 drill holes in 1997.

After completing the acquisition of Florence Copper in February 2010, Curis conducted approximately eight thousand feet of drilling in 6 drill holes to verify previous results, provide metallurgical samples, and information for further project development. Curis performed detailed data verification and generated a new resource model for the project as well as undertaking a metallurgical program focused on simulating in-situ conditions by using whole core box leach tests.

Geological Setting, Mineralization and Deposit Types

The Florence Copper Project hosts a porphyry copper deposit consisting of a large core of sulfide copper mineralization underlying a zone of oxide copper mineralization. The deposit formed when numerous dike swarms of Laramide granodiorite porphyry intruded Precambrian quartz monzonite near Poston Butte. Hydrothermal solutions associated with the intrusion altered the host rock depositing copper and iron sulfide minerals in the strongly faulted and fractured rocks.

Mid-Tertiary Basin and Range extensional faults subsequently elevated and isolated much of the Florence Copper deposit as a horst block and this block as well as the downthrown fault blocks were exposed to weathering and erosion. The centre of the deposit was eventually eroded to a gently undulating surface and the deposit was buried due to regional erosion processes to a depth of approximately 400 feet. During this period of erosion and deposition, a clay layer was deposited approximately 75 feet above the bedrock surface that impedes the mixing of groundwater between the near surface aquifer and the deeper aquifer hosting the mineralized zone.


- 28 -

Mineralization in the highly-fractured oxide zone consists primarily of chrysocolla with lesser “copper wad,” tenorite, cuprite, native copper, and trace azurite and brochantite. The majority of the copper occurs as chrysocolla in veins and fracture fillings, while the remainder occurs as copper-bearing clays in fracture fillings and former plagioclase sites. The average thickness of the oxidized zone is approximately 400 feet.

The main sulfide minerals in the deposit are chalcopyrite, pyrite and molybdenite with minor chalcocite and covellite. The supergene chalcocite blanket is very thin and irregular and in most instances the transition from the oxide zone to the sulfide zone is quite abrupt.

Exploration

Substantial exploration work has been undertaken on the Florence Copper site by previous owners including drilling (exploration, assessment, condemnation, geotechnical and environmental), underground mine development, geophysical surveys and mineralogy studies.

Over the period since Taseko acquired the Florence Copper Project, the Company has not conducted any exploration work on the property, its activities concentrating on permitting and metallurgical testing, and engineering.

Drilling

Drilling on the Florence Copper site has been undertaken by means of core drilling, RC rotary drilling and conventional rotary drilling. Conoco developed a detailed geologic core logging protocol in the early to mid-1970s and subsequent geologists have continued to use this method, with slight modifications, to maintain continuity of the geologic data produced.

Since 2009, work on the property has been focused on the site’s potential copper production through ISCR which has included the drilling of 6 holes to obtain samples for metallurgical testing and engineering studies to support planning for project development.

Drilling performed on the property is summarized in Table 7 below.


- 29 -

Table 7: Drilling by Company

Company
# of Drill
Holes
Core Length
(metres)
Curis Resources (2011) 6 7,752
BHP Copper (1997) 21 16,638
Magma Copper Company (1994-1996) 172 146,891
Conoco (1970-1977) 612 620,483
Other 6 3,716
Total 817 795,480

Sampling, Analysis and Data Verification

Sampling protocols were developed by previous owners to ensure consistency and mitigate bias. Sampling consisted of core samples and cuttings from drilling, as well as bulk samples obtained from the underground workings. Core samples as well as conventional rotary and reverse circulation drill cuttings were all assayed, although assays for conventional rotary cuttings are considered unreliable and have not been used in the project data set. Core samples provide the most representative, unbiased samples of the mineralized materials encountered in the borehole.

Assays of drill samples were conducted by various laboratories under the supervision of Arizona-registered assayers and laboratory managers. The “San Manuel Method” was consistently used by Magma, BHP and outside laboratories contracted for the analysis of percent acid-soluble copper content in the Florence drill and metallurgical test samples.

Data verification has been performed by each company conducting exploration and development at the Florence Copper site. Analytical results from the 2011 Curis metallurgical and confirmation drilling program indicated copper concentrations similar to those collected from prior drilling programs performed in the same areas. Historical drill core and pulps are stored at the Florence Copper site in a secure facility.

A review, conducted by SRK Consulting, concluded that the sampling, analysis and data verification conducted on the Florence Copper site followed industry standard practice and that the resultant drill hole database, including assays and other information, is of high quality and has been sufficiently verified.

Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing

The Florence Copper property has a long history of metallurgical testing which establishes the amenability of the site oxide copper mineralization to leaching. Historic test work has included laboratory scale column testing and vat leaching as well as pilot scale vat and agitation leaching. These tests have been conducted on material sourced from drill core as well as a bulk sample from the test underground mining.


- 30 -

Recent metallurgical test work has focused on test methods specific to simulating ISCR performance. This program began in 2011 with box leach tests where whole drill core was leached at near atmospheric pressure to simulate leaching of undisturbed ore. In 2013 development of a pressurized test apparatus led to tests on whole drill core to simulate the hydrostatic pressure in the ore body during leaching and rinsing. This pressurized test apparatus has been refined to more accurately simulate ISCR conditions as the test work has proceeded and a test linking seven pressurized cells in series was completed in 2016. This series leach test passed solutions through approximately 15 feet of whole core with a solution transit time of about 13 days, representing approximately the mid-point of scale-up between a single pressurized test with a solution transit time of less than two days and the full scale well field with an estimated 30 days transit time. The development of the ISCR leach test methodologies culminating in the series leach test has allowed the laboratory to produce mature leach solutions with compositions that closely correspond to those predicted for the full scale operation. All of the ISCR leach testing was conducted in closed circuit and used solvent extraction to recover the leached copper into a proxy electrolyte solution.

The leaching model for ISCR at Florence is based on data from the box leach tests, individual pressurized tests and the series testing. Laboratory data used for modelling is subjected to a validation process based on established industry practice in the copper leaching field. The leach model is then combined with a model of sweep efficiency, which adjusts for the amount of mineralized material that would be contacted by solutions over time in the ISCR well field, and a recovery factor to account for the proportion of copper leached which is plated as cathode copper. Recovery to cathode copper is predicted to be 70% over a four year leach cycle for Florence Copper.

Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimates

The Florence Copper mineral reserves, as defined by the Florence Copper Technical Report, are based on ISCR from the oxide zone material combined with SX/EW to produce cathode copper. The reserves utilize a copper price of US$2.50 and the reserve estimate is presented in Table 8 below. The Probable reserve estimate includes the resources categorized as Measured and Indicated for oxide material within the resource boundary. The Probable reserve estimate does not include the inferred resources within the resource boundary.

Table 8: Reserve Estimate at 0.05% TCu Cut-off


Tons
(in millions)

Grade
Contained Cu
(in millions lbs)
Probable 345 0.36 2,473
Note: Contained metal values do not account for metallurgical recoveries. The tonnage factor is 12.5 ft 3 /ton.

Cautionary Note to Investors concerning estimates of Measured and Indicated Resources

The following section uses the terms “measured” and “indicated resources”. We advise investors that while those terms are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize them. Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all mineral deposits in these categories that are not already classified as “reserves” will ever be converted into reserves.


- 31 -

The Florence Copper mineral resource is summarized in the Table 9 and includes the mineral reserves included in Table 8 above. Only oxide mineralization in bedrock is included in the estimates as sulfide mineralization is not considered recoverable by ISCR methods and is consequently not included in either the current mineral resource or reserve estimates.

Table 9: Florence Project Mineral Resources

  All Oxide in Bedrock (0.05 %TCu cutoff)

Class
Tons
(in millions)

Grade
Cu
(in millions lbs)
Measured 296 0.35 2,094
Indicated 134 0.28 745
M+I 429 0.33 2,839
Inferred 63 0.24 295
Note: All oxide includes the entire copper oxide zone and iron-oxide leached cap zone including the top 40-foot of bedrock (bedrock exclusion zone). Contained metal values do not account for metallurgical recoveries. The tonnage factor is 12.5 ft 3 /ton.

Mining Operations

The mining method proposed for Florence Copper is ISCR which is an extraction method used for selected mineral deposit conditions as an alternative to open pit or underground mine methods. The Florence Copper deposit is amenable to the ISCR method due to the high degree of natural fracturing in the oxide zone, connectivity of the fractures, acid soluble copper mineralization that occurs on the faces of the fractures, and host rocks as well as deposit hydrologic conditions which are favorable for leaching operations.

The ISCR process involves drilling wells into the mineralized material and circulating a dilute low pH lixiviant solution (consisting of 99% water) through the ore between injection and recovery wells. The lixiviant solution dissolves the copper minerals and the resulting copper rich solution is processed in a conventional SX/EW plant where the copper is removed from the solution and plated as cathode copper.

The ISCR method is highly environmentally efficient, does not require the large scale movement of waste rock or ore and will have minimal impact on the site topography. Using ISCR will result in the project consuming less energy, less water and producing less carbon dioxide emissions and waste per pound of copper produced than a conventional mining operation. The project well field design includes a surrounding network of perimeter wells and monitoring wells to ensure that the process solutions remain in the mineralized zone and, when leaching in an area is completed, the process solutions will be rinsed from the block to restore the ground water quality.


- 32 -

Processing and Recovery Operations

Copper recovery at Florence Copper will utilize conventional SX/EW technology to produce cathode copper from the copper-bearing leach solutions pumped from the ISCR well field. The planned commercial SX/EW plant is designed to handle a flow of 11,000 gpm with a PLS grade of 2 grams per litre.

The planned processing plant and associated infrastructure will be located on Florence Copper private land to the east of the State Land parcel. The process fluids are piped to and from the process plant in lined trenches.

The process consists of the following elements:

Infrastructure, Permitting and Compliance Activities

The Florence Copper area has excellent local infrastructure and vendor resources to support exploration, development, and mining. Service companies for the metals/non-metals, coal, oil and gas industries are located in Phoenix and Tucson as well as, at a greater distance, in Albuquerque, New Mexico and Denver, Colorado. Skilled manpower resources are readily available locally due to the area’s long history of copper exploration and mining.

The project site has an administration building, warehouse building, equipment laydown yard and core storage facility. The project site is serviced from existing water wells for its’ potable water needs as well as for future process requirements. The site is also presently serviced with electrical power, trash pick-up, a septic system for sanitary wastes and full communication services including landline telephone, cellular telephone and internet services.

Power for commercial development of the project is available from an Arizona Public Service high-voltage transmission line at the northwest corner of the property. Natural gas is available in the area from Southwest Gas approximately one mile east of the site.

The various permits required to authorize the Florence Copper Phase 1 Production Test Facility (“PTF”) have been issued by the regulators and are in the process of being finalized. The status of permitting activities is provided below.


- 33 -

The Temporary Aquifer Protection Permit (“APP”) for the PTF was issued in August 2016 by the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (“ADEQ”) and was subject to an appeal. The Water Quality Appeals Board conducted a hearing on three remaining issues under appeal and dismissed the appeal, upholding the permit.

In February 2016, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) issued the final Memorandum of Agreement in accordance to the Section 106 National Historic Preservation Act for the archeological work associated with the construction of the PTF. In December 2016, the Company received the final Underground Injection Control (“UIC”) Permit for the PTF from the EPA. This permit is now going through an appeal process.

After the UIC permit is finalized the Company will have all of the permits required for construction and operation of the PTF. The timing to finalize this permit is somewhat uncertain but the Company anticipates completion in mid-2017.

Capital and Operating Costs

The estimated pre-production capital cost for the Florence Copper commercial production facility is US$204 million. A summary of the major components of the capital cost estimate is presented in Table 10.

Table 10: Summary of Pre-Production Capital Cost Estimate

Item
Capital Cost
(millions $US)
Pre-Production ISCR Well Field $42
SX/EW Plant $49
Utilities, Infrastructure and Ancillaries $14
Indirect Costs $61
Owner’s Costs $21
Total Construction Capital Costs $188
Pre-Production Operating Costs $16
Total Pre-Production and Capital Costs $204

Sustaining capital expenditures during the production period were estimated to be US$713 million. This capital will be expended over a 22-year period and consists of US$624 million for well field development and US$89 million for a water treatment plant and construction of process water ponds.


- 34 -

Details of the basis for capital cost estimates can be found in the Florence Copper Technical Report.

The estimated average operating costs for Florence Copper over the life of mine is US$0.90 per pound of copper and the estimated total production cost is US$1.10 per pound of copper produced inclusive of royalties. Details of the estimated operating costs are presented in Table 11.

Table 11: Summary of Operating Cost Estimate

Item
Operating Cost
($US per lb copper)
ISCR Well Field $0.33
SX/EW Plant $0.24
Water Treatment $0.07
General and Administration $0.19
Reclamation $0.04
Off Property Costs $0.02
Total Operational Costs $0.90
Royalties $0.21
Total Production Costs $1.10

The details of the basis for the project operating cost estimate can be found in the Florence Copper Technical Report.

The main assumptions and inputs to the base case economic analysis of the Florence Copper Project are:

The base case economic analysis of the Florence Copper Project yields the following key economic indicators:


- 35 -

Exploration, Development and Production

Development of the site is planned to occur in two phases. The first phase is construction and operation of the PTF which will demonstrate the application of ISCR to the Florence Copper Project. The second phase is the construction and operation of the commercial ISCR facility with a production capacity of 85 million pounds of cathode copper per year and an expected average annual production of 81 million pounds of copper over 21 years. The Company is currently in the final stages of permitting for the PTF phase.

Legal and Permitting

On September 28, 2012, the ADEQ issued Florence Copper an APP for the development of a PTF, which involves the construction, operation and closure of a 24-well ISCR operation on the State Land portion of the Company’s project site. Following the completion of the required public comment and response period, on July 3, 2013 ADEQ issued to Florence Copper an appealable APP. On August 2, 2013 a single appeal to the Water Quality Appeals Board (“WQAB”) was filed by the Town of Florence and others. The WQAB referred the matter to the Office of Administrative Hearings (“OAH”) to conduct an administrative hearing, which took place from March 18, 2014 through May 7, 2014. The Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) issued a recommendation to the WQAB on September 29, 2014. On November 14, 2014, the WQAB issued its Final Order, which adopted most of the ALJ’s recommendations and remanded the APP to ADEQ to amend pursuant to the agency’s Significant Amendment process. On April 1, 2015, Florence Copper submitted to ADEQ an application to amend its APP in accordance with the WQAB’s ruling. ADEQ issued a final Significant Amendment to the APP on August 3, 2016, following the completion of the required public comment and response period. The Town of Florence and two nearby property developers filed an appeal of the Significant Amendment with the WQAB on September 1, 2016. The WQAB conducted a hearing on three remaining issues under appeal and dismissed the appeal, upholding the permit.

On March 4, 2013, the Florence Town Council authorized the town staff to initiate an eminent domain action against Florence Copper’s patented mining land held in fee simple. The action did not include the 159.5 acre State Trust Land parcel on which Florence Copper can operate for nine years, including the Phase 1 PTF and the initial years of commercial operations. On October 14, 2013, the Town of Florence filed suit in Pinal County Superior Court seeking a declaration that (a) Florence Copper does not have vested contractual rights or common law rights to conduct in-situ copper recovery mining on its private property, and (b) if such rights exist, the Town seeks to expropriate a legal non-conforming use within its Town boundaries through eminent domain. Florence Copper filed a motion to change the case venue and a motion to dismiss the eminent domain portion of the complaint. The motion was granted and the case was moved to the Complex Litigation Bench in Maricopa County Superior Court. On July 2, 2015, Florence Copper’s motion to dismiss the eminent domain claim was also granted. The remaining issue now pending in Maricopa County Superior Court is whether a legal non-conforming use (“LNCU”) right to mine continues to exist on Florence Copper’s privately owned land. The Town filed a motion for summary judgment on the LNCU issue on November 10, 2015, however, Florence Copper requested, and the court agreed, that significant discovery must be undertaken before a ruling on the motion may be made. Following document production and witness depositions, Florence Copper filed a cross-motion for summary judgment on July 29, 2016. Both motions for summary judgment have been fully briefed and rulings are expected from the superior court judge in early March 2017.


- 36 -

On December 20, 2016, the EPA issued the final Underground Injection Control Permit to Florence Copper. This permit regulates the operation of Class III underground injection wells at the PTF. Three petitions for review have been filed with the Environmental Appeals Board (“EAB”) of the EPA. These petitions were filed by the Town of Florence and Southwest Value Partners, the Gila River Indian Community, and John Anderson, a Town Councilman representing himself. Responsive briefs from EPA and Florence Copper are due to the EAB on April 7, 2017. The EAB will then determine whether to grant full appellate briefing of one or more of the issues raised in the petitions or dismiss some or all of them. This review process is expected to be completed in 2017.

Aley Project

Current Technical Report

Unless stated otherwise, information of a technical or scientific nature related to the Aley Project contained in this AIF (including documents incorporated by reference herein) is summarized or extracted from a technical report entitled “Technical Report on Mineral Reserves at the Aley Project” dated October 30, 2014, (the “Aley Technical Report”) prepared by Scott Jones, P.Eng, Keith Merriam, P.Eng, Greg Yelland, P.Eng, Robert Rotzinger, P.Eng., and Ronald G. Simpson, P.Geo., each of whom is a Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101 and filed on Taseko’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com .

Project Description, Location, and Access

Niobium is a metal used in high strength low alloy steels which are required to manufacture automobiles, bridges, pipes, jet turbines and other high technology applications. Ninety percent of niobium enters the market as ferroniobium (FeNb); 15% of all steel produced worldwide contains FeNb. The increase in demand for FeNb has resulted largely from the overall growth in the global steel market. Demand for ferroniobium has grown at approximately 5-7% per annum in recent years and Taseko anticipates that growth to continue over the next 10 years. Currently, 90% of the world’s niobium is supplied by three mines: CBMM (Companhia Brasileira de Metalurgia e Mineração) and CMOC (China Molybdenum Co., Ltd.) mines in Brazil, and the Niobec mine operated by Magris Resources in Quebec, Canada.

The property is located in the Omineca Mining Division in British Columbia, Canada, centred at latitude 56°27’N and longitude 123°13’W, approximately 140 kms north northwest of the Municipality of Mackenzie. Logging roads from Mackenzie provide access to the Ospika Logging Camp on the east side of Williston Lake. The property is located about 30 kms from the Ospika Camp and is currently accessed via helicopter.


- 37 -

The Aley property consists of one mineral lease valid until at least December 2045 as long as annual renewal fees are paid, and one hundred and eleven mineral claims covering the mineral rights for approximately 470 square kms. Six claims are in good standing until December 2024 while the balance are in good standing until at least October 2025. It is intended that the lease and claims will be renewed prior to their renewal fees being due (in the case of the lease) and prior to their expiry in the case of the claims.

There are no title encumbrances, surface rights issues or legal access obligations that must be met in order for Aley Corporation to retain this property. The Aley Property is not subject to any royalty terms, back-in rights, payments or any other agreements or encumbrances.

As this is a green-field project, there are no existing environmental liabilities on the property and there has been no development at the site. When additional site work is required, permit applications will be made. The Company does not hold any surface rights.

History

Cominco Ltd. (“Cominco”) acquired the property in 1980 after following up on base metals soil anomalies in the northern part of the property. Samples collected in the Aley area showed evidence of carbonatite including niobium mineralization. Cominco staked a series of claims from 1982 through 1986.

Cominco field work from 1983 through 1986 included access trail construction, ground magnetic and scintillometer surveys, geologic mapping, soil and rock chip sampling and drilling of 19 core holes (3,046 metres). Preliminary metallurgical work followed in 1983-85 using material from a 5 ton bulk sample.

Following the acquisition of control of the mineral claims by Aley Corporation in 2004, exploration efforts concentrated on trench sampling for metallurgical material and the confirmation of previous geology and drill hole collar locations.

In 2006, metallurgical test work was conducted by on surface samples blasted from the Saddle and Central Zone trenches for metallurgical work.

In June 2007, Taseko acquired 100% of the Aley niobium project from Aley Corporation for total cash consideration of $1.5 million and 894,730 common shares then valued at $2.9 million. Taseko purchased the residual net smelter royalty for total cash consideration of $0.3 million and the issuance of units having a value at the time of $0.8 million (consisting of 240,000 common shares and 120,000 warrants).

From 2007 to 2011, Taseko completed three programs of helicopter supported exploration drilling comprising a total of 22,922 metres in 104 holes.


- 38 -

Drilling results through 2010 established an inferred mineral resource of 159 million tonnes grading 0.43% Nb 2 O 5 using a cut-off grade of 0.20% Nb 2 O 5 .

Drilling results through 2011 established a measured and indicated resource of 286 million tonnes grading 0.37% Nb 2 O 5 using a cut-off grade of 0.20% Nb 2 O 5 .

From 2011 to 2014, Taseko focused on metallurgical testing of the ore and developing a viable process for producing FeNb to support the pre-feasibility level design work completed in 2014. Environmental baseline data collection was also carried out during this period.

Since 2014, Taseko has maintained key environmental baseline data collection. In late 2015, metallurgical process optimization work was initiated and is ongoing.

Geological Setting, Mineralization, and Deposit Type

The Aley region lies within the Western Foreland belt of the Rocky Mountains. It is characterized by Early to Middle Paleozoic deep water carbonates and shales. The Aley Creek area lies near the eastern limit of Paleozoic volcanism and coarse clastic sedimentation in the Foreland Belt.

The Aley Carbonatite complex intrudes Cambrian to Ordovician sedimentary rocks of the Kechika (limestone), Skoki (dolomite to volcaniclastics) and Road River Group formations (clastic sedimentary rocks). The intrusion is ovoid in plan with a diameter of approximately 2 kms and surrounded by a fenite aureole up to 500 metres. The complex is predominantly composed of dolomite carbonatite (CD) with minor calcite carbonatite (CC). Texturally, relationships suggest CD to be metasomatic in origin while CC is interpreted to be primary.

Niobium (Nb) bearing minerals at Aley are pyrochlore, fersmite and columbite, the latter two being alteration products of pyrochlore. Alteration at Aley has followed a general sequence: pyrochlore has altered to fersmite then fersmite has altered to columbite.

Exploration

The only non-drilling exploration work conducted by Taseko since acquiring the property is geologic mapping undertaken in 2009 and 2010 and geochemical mineralogical and petrographic characterization in 2010. This information was used to define targets in the 2010 and 2011 drill programs.

Drilling

In 1985 and 1986 Cominco drilled twenty diamond drill holes totaling 3,062 metres in the Central and Saddle Zones.

Taseko completed an initial exploration program on the Aley deposit in 2007 that included 11 diamond drill holes to check the results of the 1985-86 drilling program and to plan for subsequent exploration work. No work was done on the Aley project in 2008 or 2009.


- 39 -

Taseko completed an exploration program in the summer of 2010, comprising geological mapping and 4,460 metres of diamond drilling in 23 holes in the Central Zone. These holes intersected excellent grade niobium mineralization across an area measuring over 900 metres east-west and 350 metres north-south. Mineralized drill intercepts ranged up to over 200 metres in length. Niobium mineralization intersected was highly continuous and close to surface. The extensive body of niobium mineralization indicated by the 2010 drilling was open to expansion in at least three directions and to depth.

In 2011, 17,094 metres of drilling were completed in 70 holes. The objective of the drill program was the delineation of the continuity and extent of Nb mineralization in the Central Zone with infill drilling. The program also sought to establish a better understanding of the deposit geometry and the continuity and extent of Nb mineralization.

Condemnation and geotechnical drilling totalling 2,493 metres was completed in 2012. In addition 10 kms of exploration access road right of way was cleared and 5 kms of road was established.

Sampling, Analysis, and Data Verification

The sample database for the Aley project contains results from 104 core holes drilled between 1985 and the end of 2011. The Central Zone has been tested by 98 holes all of which are entirely within the carbonatite complex. All of the assays on drill samples have been performed by reputable, independent third party analytical laboratories.

Taseko implemented a QAQC program consistent with common industry practice after taking over the project in 2007. This program was in addition to the QAQC procedures used internally by the analytical laboratories. The results of this program indicate that analytical results are of high quality and suitable for use in detailed modeling and resource evaluation studies.

Details of sample preparation, assay laboratories, security, and data verification used in the drill hole sampling and analytical programs is documented in the Aley Technical Report.

Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing

The metallurgical testing that was used as the basis for design was conducted at SGS Laboratory in Vancouver, and at XPS in Sudbury from 2011 to 2014. The test program included: mineralogical work, liberation analysis, comminution test work, gravity work, magnetic separation, batch and locked cycle flotation programs and leach test work. The niobium concentrate produced from the work at SGS was sent to XPS for conversion test work.

The final flow sheet developed from the test work includes comminution, magnetic separation, flotation, leaching and final conversion.

The overall results from the series of tests conducted at the labs show that a process plant recovery of 71% was achieved in repeatable and stable locked cycle tests and a leach recovery average of 95% was achieved over all leach tests. The overall ferroniobium grade achieved was 63% Nb at a recovery to ferroniobium alloy of 65%.


- 40 -

Details of metallurgical test work is documented in the Aley Technical Report.

Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimates

The Company and its consultants carried out progressive engineering, metallurgical and environmental studies over the period 2011 to 2014, including completion of a pre-feasibility level study of the project in 2014.

The resulting mineral reserves using long-term metal prices of US$45.00/kg for niobium and an exchange rate of US$0.90/CDN$ 1.00 are shown in Table 12.

Table 12: Aley Mineral Reserves at 0.30% Nb 2 O 5 Cut-off

Category Tonnes (millions) Nb 2 O 5 (%)
Proven
Probable
44
40
0.52
0.48
Total 84 0.50

Cautionary Note to Investors concerning estimates of Measured and Indicated Resources

This section uses the terms “measured” and “indicated resources”. We advise investors that while those terms are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize them. Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all mineral deposits in these categories that are not already classified as “reserves” will ever be converted into reserves.

The Resource Estimate is documented in the technical report titled “Technical Report Aley Carbonatite Niobium Project Omineca Mining District British Columbia, Canada” by Ronald G. Simpson, P. Geo., dated March 29, 2012, filed on www.sedar.com . That information remains current as there have been no additional relevant exploration results since that time within the resource area. The mineral resource for the Aley Deposit is summarized in Table 13 at a cut-off grade of 0.20% Nb 2 O 5 .

Table 13: Aley Mineral Resources at 0.20% Nb 2 O 5 Cut-off

Category Tonnes (millions) Nb 2 O 5 (%)
Measured
Indicated
113
173
0.41
0.35
Total Measured and Indicated 286 0.37
Inferred 144 0.32

The mineral resources shown in Table 13 include the mineral reserves shown in Table 12.


- 41 -

Mining Operations

The mining method planned is a conventional open pit with equipment sized and fleet requirements determined to meet the required production rate.

The designed pit is subdivided into 2 phases, the first phase mining down the east ridge, the second phase mining the west and north ridges and down to the bottom of the pit. Using the 2 pit phases, a 24 year production schedule has been developed. For the final 4 years of the mill production under this plan, mining will have been completed from the pit and all mill feed will be from the stockpile.

The mine plan and production schedule were developed for a 10,000 tonnes per day mill feed operation and results in a life of mine strip waste:ore ratio of 0.5 to 1.

Processing and Recovery Operations

The processing plant has been designed with a nominal capacity of 10,000 tonnes per day. The plant consists of a three stage comminution circuit that consists of a SAG mill, a ball mill, and a fine grinding mill with the appropriate size classification circuits. Final comminution product is fed to the concentration plant, details of which are proprietary and confidential. An upgraded concentrate from the concentrator is fed to a leach facility for further processing, while waste streams produced in the concentrator are recombined and pumped to a tailings storage management facility. Leached concentrate residue is then processed through a calciner and proceeds to ferroniobium conversion. Converter waste is stored in a secure containment facility and final product ferroniobium is delivered to market.

Expected life-of-mine overall niobium metallurgical recovery is 63% with annual production averaging approximately 14 million kilograms of FeNb which is equivalent to approximately nine million kilograms of contained niobium over the 24 year mine life.

Infrastructure, Permitting, and Compliance Activities

The ferroniobium will be hauled with highway trucks to a transfer station in Mackenzie for rail or truck transport to various points of sale, but primarily through the Port of Vancouver for shipment to smelters/refineries around the world.

Power is proposed to be supplied via a new 150 km long, 138 kV transmission line from the BC Hydro Morfee substation in the community of Mackenzie. Infrastructure would also include the upgrade of sections of the existing road to the site, an on-site camp, equipment maintenance shop, administration office, concentrator and converter facilities, warehouse, and explosives facilities.

The project would employ up to 325 permanent hourly and staff personnel. In addition, contractor personnel would be employed in areas including catering, and goods and personnel transportation.


- 42 -

On September 19, 2014, the British Columbia Environmental Assessment Office (“EAO”) issued a Section 10 Order under the British Columbia Environmental Assessment Act, initiating the provincial environmental assessment process for the Project.

On November 24, 2014, the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (“CEAA”) determined that a federal environmental assessment was required, issued a Notice of Commencement, and approved British Columbia’s request for Substitution under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 . As a result the province will conduct the assessment and Aboriginal consultation on behalf of the Federal government.

On December 31, 2014, British Columbia issued a Section 11 Order under the Environmental Assessment Act describing the scope of the Aley project subject to the environmental assessment, identifying the Aboriginal Groups requiring consultation, and directing Taseko to draft Application Information Requirements (“AIR”) for the environmental assessment application.

Capital and Operating Costs

A summary of the estimated pre-production capital costs estimated for the project is $870 million and is summarized in Table 14.

Table 14: Summary of Capital Costs

Area
Capital Cost
(in millions) (1)
Mining Equipment $25
Capitalized Pre-Production Costs $38
Process Plant - Concentrate $166
Process Plant - FeNb Converter $97
Sand Storage & Water Reclaim $50
Ancillary Facilities $43
On-Site Infrastructure $62
Off-Site Infrastructure $86
Subtotal Direct Costs $569
Indirect Costs $145
Owner’s Costs $46
Contingency $110
Subtotal for Indirect Costs $301
Total $870

(1) Totals may not add due to rounding.

Life of Mine sustaining capital costs are estimated at $80 million.

All costs shown are in Q3 2014 Canadian dollars. No allowances have been made for escalation, interest and financing, taxes or working capital in the capital cost estimate.


- 43 -

Estimated average operating costs are summarized in Table 15.

Table 15: Summary of Site Operating Costs

Operating Category
Operating Cost
($/tonne)
Mining $4.63
Processing $44.90
General and administrative $6.05
Off-site costs $2.62
Total $58.20

The basis for capital and operating cost estimates are documented in the Aley Technical Report.

A list of the main assumptions and inputs to the economic analysis of the Aley project are listed below:

The following pre-tax economic indicators are derived from the base case life of mine cash flow:

Exploration, Development, and Production

The Company is currently preparing the draft Application Information Requirements (“AIR”) for the Environmental Assessment. The EAO has established a Working Group, comprising of representatives of CEAA, government agencies, First Nations, and local governments. This group will provide input on aspects of the environmental assessment including the AIR.

Environmental monitoring of surface and groundwater baseline conditions and geochemical characterization of ore, waste rock, and tailings in support of the Environmental Impact Statement is ongoing. Although the majority of the ongoing work on the Aley Project is environmental assessment related, some additional metallurgical process optimization work commenced in the fourth quarter of 2015. This work consists of evaluating alternatives for both the hydrometallurgical and pyrometallurgical portions of the project flow sheet. An internal review of the project metallurgical testing and flow sheet development identified these process steps as having significant potential to reduce both the project pre-production capital cost and the operating costs.


- 44 -

Prosperity Project

Current Technical Report

Unless stated otherwise, information of a technical or scientific nature related to the Prosperity project contained in this AIF is summarized or extracted from a technical report entitled “Technical Report on the 344 Million Tonne Increase in Mineral Reserves at the Prosperity Gold – Copper Project” dated December 17, 2009, (the “Prosperity Technical Report”) prepared by Scott Jones, P. Eng. and filed on Taseko’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com . Mr. Jones is employed by the Company as Vice-President, Engineering and is a Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101. Readers are cautioned that the Prosperity Technical Report is now some seven years old and accordingly caution needs to be advised when assessing its conclusions in light of current operating and capital costs, appropriate technologies, metals price outlooks, and like matters.

Project Description, Location, and Access

The Prosperity project is located at latitude 51° 28’ N and longitude 123° 37’ W in the Clinton Mining Division, approximately 125 kms southwest of the City of Williams Lake, British Columbia.

Access from Williams Lake is via Highway 20 to Lee’s Corner, then via an all-weather main logging haulage road to the site, a total road distance of 192 kilometres.

The Prosperity property consists of one mineral lease which is valid until at least June 2035 as long as renewal fees, which are due on an annual basis, are paid, and 85 mineral claims covering the mineral rights for approximately 190 square kms. Six claims are in good standing until at least June 2017, while the remainder are in good standing until at least December 2018. It is intended that all leases and claims will be renewed prior to their renewal fees being due (in the case of the lease) and prior to their expiry in the case of the claims.

The claims are 100% owned by Taseko and are not subject to any royalties or carried interests.

As this is a green-field project, there are no existing environmental liabilities on the property and there has been no development at the site. When additional site work is required, permit applications will be made and approved by responsible regulatory agencies. The Company does not currently hold any surface rights, these would need to be applied for.

History

The Prosperity deposit was originally discovered by prospectors in the early 1930’s. Phelps Dodge Corporation conducted a small exploration program in the early 1960’s and subsequently allowed the claims to lapse.


- 45 -

In 1969, Taseko acquired the property and drilled 18 holes totalling approximately 2,300 metres immediately to the south of the area previously explored, discovering significant tonnage grading 0.25% to 0.30% copper.

From 1970 to 1974, under option agreements with Nittetsu Mining Company and Quintana Minerals Corporation, approximately 5,000 metres of drilling was completed in 29 holes. Bethlehem Copper Corp. (“Bethlehem”) optioned the project in 1979 and by 1981 had completed approximately 14,000 metres of drilling in 73 holes. Following the corporate merger of Bethlehem and Cominco Ltd. (“Cominco”) Cominco acquired the Bethlehem option agreement on the property. From 1982 to 1989 Cominco work programs included geophysical and soil geochemical surveys, an additional 5,300 metres of drilling in 48 holes, and a limited metallurgical test work program. In 1990, Cominco Ltd. reported a drill–indicated mineral resource of 208 million tonnes at an average grade of 0.23% Cu and 0.41 gpt Au to 360 metres below surface.

After a period of disagreement with Cominco regarding compliance with the option agreement, which included legal proceedings, in 1993 Taseko acquired 100% of the project free of any royalties or third party interests through settlement agreements.

Following drilling in 1991 and 1992, Taseko reported mineralized material (unclassified mineral resource) of 976 million tonnes at an average grade of 0.23% Cu and 0.48 gpt Au.

Comprehensive metallurgical tests were completed in 1993 and a pre-feasibility report was completed in 1994.

Following a significant drill program in the latter half of the 1990’s, in 1998 Taseko reported estimated measured and indicated mineral resources of 1.0 billion tonnes at 0.41 gpt Au and 0.24% Cu and an inferred resource of 0.2 billion tonnes grading 0.25 gpt Au and 0.21% Cu at a 0.14% copper cut-off.

Work on the project was deferred from 2000 to 2005 first due to low metal prices and then later as the Company turned its attention to re-starting the Gibraltar Mine. In November 2005, work was reactivated on the project. A pre-feasibility level study was completed in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 followed by a full feasibility study in the fall of that year. In 2008 Taseko worked with a number of consultants to investigate value engineering opportunities, energy efficiency, and operating ease in various areas of the concentrator and support infrastructure. The outcome of this work, in combination with a significantly different outlook for copper and gold prices in 2009 resulted in the current reserve.

In late 2009 and 2010, additional metallurgical testing and geotechnical investigations were undertaken in support of detailed engineering.

In 2010, Taseko worked with various consultants to advance project engineering to the detailed phase and to advance various permit applications. Taseko temporarily suspended work on detailed engineering and permitting in November 2010 following the federal cabinet’s decision on the environmental assessment.


- 46 -

In early 2011, Taseko began design revisions to the project to address the concerns identified during the federal review process.

In early 2012, Taseko completed a geotechnical field investigation to support the design and environmental assessment of the relocated tailings facility proposed as part of a New Prosperity Design.

There has been no production from the property and there is no material infrastructure on the project.

Geological Setting, Mineralization, and Deposit Types

The project is located within the western-most portion of the Intermontane Belt at the boundary between the Intermontane and Coast morphologic belts. The surrounding area is underlain by poorly exposed, Late Paleozoic to Cretaceous litho tectonic assemblages which have been intruded by plutons of Mid-Cretaceous to Early Tertiary age. The main Coast Plutonic Complex is 50 kilometres southwest of the New Prosperity project area.

The Yalakom Fault is the major fault in the region and lies to the southwest of the deposit on the New Prosperity project. Estimates of Eocene dextral strike-slip offsets for the Yalakom Fault have been postulated variously as ranging from 80 to 190 kms, 125 to 175 kms or 115 kms. It may have imparted some related structural controls that are important to the localization of mineralization at the deposit.

The project hosts a large porphyry gold-copper deposit. The deposit is predominantly hosted in Cretaceous andesitic volcaniclastic and volcanic rocks. In the western portion of the deposit, the host rocks have been intruded by the multi-phase, steeply dipping Fish Creek Stock. The stock is surrounded by an east-west trending, south dipping swarm of subparallel quartz-feldspar porphyritic dykes. The stock and dykes comprise the Late Cretaceous Fish Lake Intrusive Complex that is spatially and genetically related to the deposit. Post mineralization porphyritic diorite occurs as narrow dykes that cross-cut all host rocks. The central portion of the deposit is cut by two major faults, striking north-south and dipping steeply to the west.

Pyrite and chalcopyrite are the principal sulphide minerals in the deposit. They are uniformly distributed in disseminations, fracture fillings, veins and veinlets and may be accompanied by bornite and lesser molybdenite and tetrahedrite-tenantite. Native gold occurs as inclusions in and along microfractures with copper-bearing minerals and pyrite.

Exploration

There has been no material non-drilling exploration conducted on the property since the early 1990’s. Exploration programs prior to this time included extensive IP and magnetic geophysical and soil geochemical surveys which contributed to the definition of the mineralization.


- 47 -

Drilling

Until 1991, exploration programs on the property included 176 percussion and diamond drill holes totalling approximately 27,100 metres. This work helped define the project mineralization to a depth of 200 metres, and outlined a gold-copper mineralized zone approximately 850 metres in diameter.

Diamond drilling from 1991 through 1997 totalled approximately 85,000 metres in 267 holes, expanding the deposit to 1400 metres east-west, 600 metres north-south and to 850 metres below surface, increasing the density of drilling in the deposit, and adding to the geotechnical and geochemical characterization of the deposit.

From 1963 to 1997, a total of 155,000 metres had been drilled in 452 holes.

Six core holes totaling 1,762 metres were drilled in 2007 for metallurgical purposes. The purpose of this program was to provide sufficient material representative of the various alteration zones anticipated to be encountered in the first six years of production.

Sampling, Analysis, and Data Verification

Over 65,000 samples have been taken for analysis from drilling since 1969. All of the assays on drill samples have been performed by reputable, independent third party analytical laboratories.

Taseko implemented a quality control quality assurance (“QAQC”) program consistent with common industry practice after taking over the project in 1991. This program was in addition to the QAQC procedures used internally by the analytical laboratories. The results of this program indicate that analytical results are of high quality and suitable for use in detailed modeling and resource evaluation studies.

Details of sample preparation, assay laboratories, security, and data verification used in the drill hole sampling and analytical programs is documented in the Prosperity Technical Report.

Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing

Progressive metallurgical studies over the period 1991 through 1993 included batch and locked cycle flotation tests on composites representing different areas of the deposit to determine achievable copper and gold recoveries and provide detailed concentrate analysis, grind-ability assessments, tailings settling tests, environmental data, and a cursory examination of the removal of deleterious elements from flotation concentrate.

In 1996 a run-in pilot plant was carried out as a precursor to a comprehensive pilot plant; its main objectives to establish basic operating parameters and generate material for initial environmental testing.

In 1997 a pilot plant campaign included batch and locked cycle tests as well as pilot plant runs carried out on composites prepared representing different zones of the deposit. It also included grinding test work, detailed analysis of concentrates, generation of environmental data, tailings settling tests, and concentrate settling and filtration tests.


- 48 -

A test work program was completed in 2008 to investigate the metallurgical performance of Prosperity mineralization at coarser regrinds and alternate regrind flow sheets. This work was conducted on core from the 2007 drilling campaign that represented years 1 through 4 mill feed.

The results support estimated life of mine recoveries of copper and gold recoveries of 87% and 69% respectively using conventional flotation methods.

Estimated average concentrate grades over the mine life are 24% copper, 35 g/t gold and 89 g/t silver. Smelter penalties are anticipated for arsenic, antimony, and mercury.

Additional details with respect to metallurgical test work can be found in the Prosperity Technical Report.

Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimates

The mineral resources and mineral reserves are as documented in the 2009 Prosperity Technical Report.

The reserve estimate uses long-term metal prices of US$1.65/lb for copper and US$650/oz for gold and a foreign exchange of CDN$1.00=US$ 0.82.

The proven and probable reserves are tabulated in Table 16 below.

Table 16: Prosperity Mineral Reserves at CDN$5.50 NSR/t Pit-Rim Cut-off

Category

Tonnes
(millions)
Gold
(g/t)
Copper
(%)
Recoverable
Gold Ounces
(millions)
Recoverable
Copper Pounds
(billions)
Proven
Probable
481
350
0.46
0.35
0.26
0.18
5.0
2.7
2.4
1.2
Total 831 0.41 0.23 7.7 3.6

Cautionary Note to Investors concerning estimates of Measured and Indicated Resources

The following section uses the terms “measured” and “indicated resources”. We advise investors that while those terms are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize them. Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all mineral deposits in these categories that are not already classified as “reserves” will ever be converted into reserves.

The mineral resources shown in Table 17 include the mineral reserves shown in Table 16. Resource estimates are based on a copper cut-off of 0.14% .


- 49 -

Table 17: Prosperity Mineral Resources at 0.14% Copper Cut-off

Category Tonnes (millions) Gold (g/t) Copper (%)
Measured
Indicated
547
463
0.46
0.34
0.27
0.21
Total 1,010 0.41 0.24

Mining Operations

The proposed mine plan utilizes a large-scale conventional open pit mining and milling operation. Following a one and a half year pre-strip period, total material mined from the open pit over years 1 to 31 averages 170,000 tonnes per day at a life-of-mine strip ratio of 1.5:1. A declining net smelter return cut-off is applied to the mill feed, which defers lower grade ore for later processing. The stockpiled ore is processed in the final years of the mine plan.

Processing and Recovery Operations

The processing plant has been designed with a nominal capacity of 70,000 tonnes per day. The plant consists of a single 12 meter diameter SAG mill, two 7.9 -metre diameter ball mills, followed by processing steps that include bulk rougher flotation, regrinding, cleaner flotation, thickening and filtering to produce a copper-gold concentrate. Expected life-of-mine metallurgical recovery is 87% for copper and 69% for gold, with annual production averaging 110 million pounds copper and 234,000 ounces gold over the 33-year mine life.

The copper-gold concentrate will be hauled with highway trucks to an expanded load-out facility at Gibraltar Mines Ltd.’s existing facility near Macalister for rail transport to various points of sale, but primarily through the Port of Vancouver for shipment to smelters/refineries around the world.

Infrastructure, Permitting and Compliance Activities

Power is proposed to be supplied via a new 124 km long, 230 kV transmission line from Dog Creek on the BC Hydro Grid. The Company does not yet have rights of way or approvals to construct facilities to provide electricity to the site. Ample water is available nearby for a mining operation.

The Canadian National railway services Williams Lake and has rolling stock available to move concentrates by rail to points of sale in North America.

Infrastructure would also include the upgrade of sections of the existing road to the site, construction of a short spur to the mine site, an on-site camp, equipment maintenance shop, administration office, concentrator facility, warehouse, and explosives facilities.

The project would employ up to 460 permanent hourly and staff personnel. In addition, approximately 60 contractor personnel would be employed in areas including catering, concentrate haulage, explosives delivery, and busing.


- 50 -

The City of Williams Lake is sufficiently close and is capable of supplying goods, services, and personnel to a mine.

Between 2009 and 2010, the British Columbia Environmental Assessment Office (“EAO”) led a review of the Project in a coordinated manner with the CEAA.

On January 14, 2010, Taseko received the environmental assessment certificate for the Prosperity Project from the Province of B.C.

The Federal process was conducted by a three-person panel, whose findings were in certain respects similar to the conclusions reached in the Provincial Environmental Assessment, although they were not mandated to assess positive economic and social value generated by the project. In July 2010, the panel submitted its final report to the Federal Government.

In November 2010, the Federal Minister of Environment announced that the Prosperity mine project, as proposed, would not be granted federal authorizations to proceed. The Company reviewed and revised its plan and put forth a new design proposal, the New Prosperity project, which included the preservation of Fish Lake by relocating the tailings storage facility and modifying the water management plan. This design addressed the concerns identified during the federal review process, and in February 2011 the Company submitted a project description for the New Prosperity project to the Federal Government.

In June 2011, Taseko submitted an application to the EAO to amend the Environmental Assessment Certificate in accordance with the New Prosperity project description

On September 20, 2012, the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was submitted to the three-member Review Panel (the “Panel”) established for the federal environmental assessment of the project. Following the public hearings conducted in Williams Lake and several First Nation communities in the region in July and August 2013, the Panel prepared their report and submitted it to the Federal Minister of the Environment on October 31, 2013.

The Panel report found that the proposed project is not likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects in respect of 33 different areas provided effective mitigation was undertaken but found significant adverse environmental effects were likely in relation to three matters: (i) water quality in Fish Lake and Wasp Lake; (ii) fish and fish habitat in Fish Lake, wetlands and riparian ecosystems; and (iii) Tsilhqot’in current use of lands for traditional purposes, cultural heritage and archaeological/historical resources.

On November 29, 2013, the Company filed an application for judicial review in the Federal Court, seeking to set aside certain findings of the Panel report. The Company is asking the court for a declaration that certain findings relating to seepage and water quality be set aside, and that the Panel failed in certain respects to comply with principles of procedural fairness and the rules of natural justice.

On February 26, 2014, the Minister of the Environment announced her conclusion, based on the Panel report, that the New Prosperity Mine project is likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects that cannot be mitigated. In accordance with the requirements of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 , she referred the matter to the Governor in Council who decided that those effects are not justified in the circumstances.


- 51 -

On March 26, 2014, the Company filed an application for judicial review in Federal Court, seeking to quash the decisions of the Minister and Governor in Council communicated on February 26, 2014. The Company is also seeking a declaration that certain sections of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 , are in whole or in part beyond the powers of the Federal government under the Constitution Act, 1867.

On August 21, 2014, the Company applied to the Federal Court to convert both judicial reviews into a civil action for damages. The motion was denied with the court suggesting that the company’s concerns were best dealt with in the judicial review process.

On January 14, 2015, the British Columbia Minister of Environment granted the Company a five-year extension to the Environmental Assessment Certificate for Prosperity. The original Prosperity Environmental Assessment Certificate from the Province of British Columbia is subject to an ongoing amendment process to reflect the changes made in the New Prosperity mine design.

On February 12, 2016, the Company announced that it had filed a civil claim in British Columbia Supreme Court against the Canadian federal government. The claim seeks damages in relation to the February 26, 2014 decision concerning the New Prosperity Project in that the Government of Canada and its agents failed to meet the legal duties that were owed to Taseko and that in doing so they caused and continue to cause damages, expenses and loss to Taseko.

Taseko is proceeding with its request to amend the British Columbia environmental assessment certificate for the New Prosperity Project. In addition, Taseko has filed a Notice of Work (“NOW”) with the Ministry of Energy & Mines which will allow the Company to gather information to advance mine permitting under the Mines Act British Columbia .

The two Judicial Reviews initiated by Taseko were heard in federal court over a five day period in the week of January 30, 2017. Both Judicial Reviews focus on the principles of administrative and procedural fairness. Taseko’s allegation is that the Government of Canada, through the conduct of the environmental assessment and the decisions which resulted from it, failed in their obligation to uphold those fundamental principles. A decision is expected from the court within six to nine months

Capital and Operating Costs

The direct and indirect capital cost to bring the Prosperity Project into production at a design ore throughput rate of 70,000 tonnes per day was estimated in 2009 to be $814 million as summarized in Table 18.


- 52 -

Table 18: Pre-production Capital Cost

Description (in millions)
Site Preparation $10
Mining $68
Crushing, Conveying & Stockpiling $52
Concentrator $227
Tailings Disposal & Reclaim Water $22
Site Infrastructure $96
Offsite Infrastructure $55
Total Direct Costs $530
Total Indirect Costs $161
Owners Costs $19
Contingency $104
Total Project Costs $814

The capital cost estimate is expressed in constant 2nd quarter 2009 Canadian dollars using exchange rates of $US:$CDN of 0.95 and $EURO:$CDN of 0.65.

The sustaining and additional equipment capital cost estimate was $701 million over the operating life-of-mine and is summarized in Table 19.

Table 19: Life of Mine Sustaining Capital Cost

Description (in millions)
Additional Mining Equipment $248
Equipment Replacement $274
Tailings $113
Concentrator and Infrastructure $30
Closure $36
Total $701

The operating costs for the Prosperity Project, including mining, milling, and general and administrative costs have been estimated in the second quarter of 2009 Canadian dollars and include no allowance for escalation or exchange rate fluctuations.

The average project site operating cost for the 33 year life-of-mine was estimated to be $7.51/tonne of ore milled.

The estimated life of mine average unit costs for each major operating area are shown in Table 20.


- 53 -

Table 20: Life-of-Mine Unit Costs

Operating Category
Site Operating Cost
($/tonne)
Mining $3.14
Milling $3.85
General and Administrative $0.52
Total $7.51

The 2009 Prosperity Technical Report used metal prices of US$650/oz gold, US$10.00/oz silver, and US$1.65/lb copper, and an exchange rate of $0.82 USD per CDN$. These were conservative values, well below long term forecast prices at the time and were used solely as the basis for determining the mineral reserve.

Key indicators derived from an economic analysis of the project at reserve metal prices only are summarized in Table 21 and are in constant 2 nd quarter 2009 CDN$.

Table 21: Key Reserve Indicators

Total copper production 1,655,000 tonnes/3,648,000,000 lbs
Total gold production 7,720,000 troy oz
Total silver production 19,800,000 troy oz
Mine Life 33 years
Pre-tax return on investment (ROI) 10.0%
Pre-tax payback period 8 years
Annual average net pre-tax cash flow (years 1-33) $100,000,000
Pre-tax NPV (at 7.5%) 222,000,000
Pre-production capital cost $814,000,000
LOM sustaining capital $701,000,000
LOM average site operating costs $7.51/t ore processed
LOM average off property costs $3.06/t ore processed
LOM average cost (net of by-product credits)* US$0.59 per lb copper produced

*Total site and off property costs including all TC/RCs and transportation

The basis for capital and operating cost estimates are documented in the 2009 Prosperity Technical Report.


- 54 -

Exploration, Development, and Production

Taseko’s current focus is on pursuing both judicial reviews, the civil action, and the provincial Environmental Assessment Certificate Amendment for New Prosperity.

The Company has evaluated the current project design and potential tailings alternatives to achieve the best environmental protection in terms of both dam stability and potential impacts to water quality. The evaluation considered best practices and best available technologies, tailings storage locations, and water balance. The evaluation is consistent with the province’s requirement for all projects to undergo an assessment of alternative means of undertaking the project with respect to options for tailings management and clarified any previous misconceptions with respect to all aspects of seepage control and water management.

In November 2016, the Company applied for a permit to conduct a site investigation program to collect the data required to complete the detailed engineering required in support of a B.C. Mines Act Permit application. Taseko anticipates the site investigation permit approval in the first quarter of 2017.

RISK FACTORS

There are a number of risks that may have a material and adverse impact on the future operating and financial performance of Taseko and could cause the Company’s operating and financial performance to differ materially from the estimates described in forward-looking statements relating to the Company.

Changes in the market price of copper, gold and other metals, which are volatile and have fluctuated widely, affect the profitability of our operations and financial condition.

Our profitability and long-term viability depend, in large part, upon the market price of metals, primarily copper, but potentially gold and other metals and minerals. The market price of copper is volatile and is affected by numerous factors beyond our control, including:


- 55 -

The copper market is volatile and cyclical and consumption of copper is influenced by global economic growth, trends in industrial production, conditions in the housing and automotive industries and economic growth in China, which is the largest consumer of refined copper in the world. Should demand weaken and consumption patterns change, in particular, if consumers seek out lower cost substitute materials, the price of copper could be adversely affected, which could negatively affect our results of operations.

A decrease in the market price of copper, gold and other metals would affect the profitability of the Gibraltar Mine and our ability to finance the exploration and development of our other mineral properties, which would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. There can be no assurance that the market price of copper and other metals will remain at current levels or that such prices will improve. If commercial quantities of copper, gold and other metals are discovered, there is no assurance that a profitable market will exist or continue to exist for a production decision to be made or for the ultimate sale of the metals.

Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Fluctuations in the Canadian dollar relative to the US dollar could significantly affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. As our Gibraltar Mine operation is located in Canada, our costs are incurred primarily in Canadian dollars. However, our revenue is based on the market price of copper and other metals and is denominated in United States dollars. A strengthening of the Canadian dollar relative to the United States dollar will reduce our profitability, adversely affect our financial condition, and may also affect our ability to finance our development projects. We do not currently enter into foreign currency contracts to hedge against currency risk.

Mining is inherently risky and operations are subject to conditions or events beyond our control, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Mining involves various types of risks and hazards, including:


- 56 -

These risks could result in injury or death, environmental damage, damage to, or destruction of, mineral properties, production facilities or other properties, delays in mining, increased production costs, monetary losses, and possible legal liability. We may not be able to obtain insurance to cover these risks at economically feasible premiums. Insurance against certain environmental risks, including potential liability for pollution or other hazards as a result of the disposal of waste products occurring from production, is not generally available to us or to other companies within the mining industry. We may suffer a material adverse impact on our business if we incur losses related to any significant events that are not covered by insurance policies.

The need for infrastructure could delay or prevent us from developing our more advanced projects.

Completion of the development of our advanced projects is subject to various requirements, including government permitting and the need to establish power, water and transportation facilities. The lack of availability on acceptable terms or the delay in the availability of any one or more of these services could prevent or delay development of our advanced projects. If adequate infrastructure is not available in a timely manner, there can be no assurance that:

We are subject to extensive governmental regulation of all aspects of our business.

Our operations and exploration and development activities are subject to extensive federal, provincial, state and local laws and regulations governing various matters, including:

Failure to secure approvals or comply with applicable laws and regulations may result in civil or criminal fines or penalties or enforcement actions, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities enjoining or curtailing operations or requiring corrective measures, installation of additional equipment or remedial actions, any of which could result in the Company incurring significant expenditures. We may also be required to compensate private parties suffering loss or damage by reason of a breach of such laws, regulations or permitting requirements. It is also possible that future laws and regulations, or a more stringent enforcement of current laws and regulations by governmental authorities, could cause additional expense, capital expenditures, restrictions on or suspensions of our operations and delays in the development of our properties.


- 57 -

We are subject to risks related to title, permits and licenses.

Although the Company has exercised reasonable due diligence with respect to determining title to properties it owns or leases, there is no guarantee that title to such properties and other tenure will not be challenged or impugned. No assurances can be given that there are no title defects affecting the properties. There may be valid challenges to the title of the Company’s properties which, if successful, could make the Company unable to operate its properties as planned or permitted, or unable to enforce its rights with respect to its properties. In British Columbia the rights of aboriginal peoples and their claims to much of the Province are not settled.

Government regulations relating to mineral rights tenure, permission to disturb areas, land use and the right to operate can adversely affect the Company. The Company’s exploration, development and operations will require permits, licenses and approvals from various governmental authorities.

Although the Florence Copper Project was permitted historically, and Florence Copper has obtained a number of the required permits, licenses and approvals, Florence Copper is currently updating and amending certain permits through a well-defined amendment process, but there can be no assurance as to the outcome of this process. There are, and may in the future be, legal challenges to the validity of permits, licenses and approvals obtained by Florence Copper, and there can be no assurance that such challenges will successfully be defeated. Obtaining, updating and defending the necessary governmental permits, licenses and approvals is a complex, time-consuming and costly process, the success of which is contingent upon many variables outside of the Company’s control. Obtaining, updating, or defending permits, licenses and approvals may increase costs and cause delays depending on the nature of the activity to be permitted and the interpretation of applicable requirements implemented by the permitting authority.

There can be no assurance that all necessary permits, licenses and approvals will be obtained or updated on a timely basis in order for the Company to carry out planned exploration, development or operational activities on its properties, including the planned development of the Florence Copper, Aley and New Prosperity projects, and, if obtained or updated, that the costs involved will not exceed those that the Company has estimated. It is possible that the costs and delays associated with the compliance with the standards and regulations under such permits, licenses and approvals could result in the Company not proceeding with the development or operation of its projects.


- 58 -

Changes in government rules, regulations or agreements, or their application, may negatively affect the Company’s ownership rights, its access to or its ability to advance the exploration and development of its mineral properties.

The government currently has in place or may in the future implement laws, regulations, policies or agreements that may negatively affect the Company’s ownership rights with respect to its mineral properties or its access to the properties. These may restrain or block the Company’s ability to advance the exploration and development of its mineral properties or significantly increase the costs and timeframe to advance the properties

As described elsewhere herein, the New Prosperity has been subject to litigation in regards to the federal Canadian government’s review of the environmental impact of the project. The outcome of the litigation is highly uncertain.

We are solely dependent on the Gibraltar Mine for revenues and suspension of production at that mine would materially adversely affect our business.

The Florence Copper, Aley, New Prosperity and the Harmony projects are in various stages of development. However, until these other projects are developed and operational and are beginning to produce revenue, we are dependent solely upon the Gibraltar Mine for revenues. If the Gibraltar Mine were to cease production for any reason, it would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, business and financial position.

Our future success depends upon our ability to develop our existing reserves.

We have not received the permits necessary to mine all of our proven and probable reserves that are economically recoverable and we may never receive them In order to develop our proven and probable reserves, we must receive various governmental permits. We can give no assurances that we will be able to obtain the governmental permits that we would need to continue developing our proven and probable reserves. Furthermore, we may not be able to mine any of our proven and probable reserves as profitably as we mine at our current operations.

Our mining operations are conducted on properties owned, subject to claims or leased by us from provincial and state governments. We may not be able to negotiate new leases or obtain contracts for properties containing surface, underground or subsidence rights necessary to develop any of our proven and probable reserves at the Florence Copper, New Prosperity or Aley projects. Additionally, our leasehold interests could potentially be at risk if mining operations are not commenced during the term of the lease.

Our projects, which are still under development, may not achieve anticipated production capacity, may experience unanticipated costs or may be delayed or not completed at all.

The Florence Copper, Aley, New Prosperity and Harmony projects are at various stages of development. The development of a project is a complex and challenging process that may take longer and cost more than predicted, or may not be completed at all. In addition, anticipated production capacity may not be achieved. We may encounter unforeseen geological conditions or delays in obtaining required construction, environmental or operating permits or mine design adjustments. Construction delays cause reduced production and cash flow while certain fixed costs, such as minimum royalties or loan payments, may still have to be paid on a predetermined schedule.


- 59 -

As our existing copper and molybdenum offtake agreements expire, our revenues and operating profits could be negatively impacted if we are unable to extend existing agreements or enter into new agreements due to competition, changing copper and molybdenum purchasing patterns, or other variables.

As our copper and molybdenum offtake agreements at the Gibraltar Mine expire, we will compete with other copper and molybdenum suppliers to renew these agreements or to obtain new sales. If we cannot renew these copper and molybdenum supply agreements with our customers or find alternate customers willing to purchase our copper and molybdenum, our revenue and operating profits would suffer.

Our customers may decide not to extend existing agreements or enter into new long-term contracts or, in the absence of long-term contracts, may decide to purchase less copper and molybdenum than in the past or on different terms, including under different concentrate pricing terms. To the degree that we operate outside of long-term contracts, our revenues are subject to pricing in the concentrate spot market that can be significantly more volatile than the pricing structure negotiated through a long-term copper and molybdenum concentrate supply agreement. This volatility could adversely affect the profitability of our operations if conditions in the spot market pricing for copper and molybdenum concentrate are unfavourable.

We are subject to risks related to environmental matters.

All of Taseko’s exploration, development, and mining operations are subject to environmental laws and regulations, which can make operations expensive or prohibit them altogether. Many environmental laws and regulations require Taseko to obtain and update permits for its activities from time to time, which may include environmental impact analyses, cultural resources analyses, and public review processes. Taseko must comply with stringent environmental legislation in carrying out work on its projects. Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner that will require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees. It is possible that future changes in environmental laws, regulations and permits, or changes in their enforcement or regulatory interpretation, could increase the cost of, or altogether prohibit, carrying out exploration, development, or operation of its projects or any other properties Taseko may acquire. Further, compliance with new or additional environmental legislation may result in delays to the exploration and development activities. It is possible that future changes in applicable laws, regulations and permits or changes in their enforcement or regulatory interpretation could have a significant impact on some portion of Taseko’s business, causing those activities to be economically re-evaluated at that time.


- 60 -

Taseko may be subject to potential risks and liabilities associated with the protection of the environment, as a result of its mineral exploration, development and production. To the extent that Taseko is subject to environmental liabilities, the payment of such liabilities or the costs that it may incur to remedy such liabilities would reduce funds otherwise available to Taseko and could have a material adverse effect on Taseko. If Taseko is unable to fully remedy an environmental liability, it might be required to suspend operations or enter into interim compliance measures pending completion of the required remedy. The potential exposure may be significant and could have a material adverse effect on Taseko.

We are subject to risks related to litigation.

The Company is or may be subject to legal proceedings related to the development of its projects, its operations, titles to it properties, environmental issues and shareholder or other investor lawsuits. Given the uncertain nature of these actions, the Company cannot reasonably predict the outcome thereof. If the Company is unable to win or favourably settle any lawsuits, it may have a material adverse effect of the Company.

Our business requires substantial capital expenditures.

Our business is capital intensive and requires construction of new mines and infrastructure and maintenance of existing operations. Specifically, the exploration, permitting and development of reserves, mining costs, the maintenance of machinery and equipment and compliance with applicable laws and regulations require substantial capital expenditures. While the capital expenditures required to build-out our Gibraltar Mine have been spent, we must continue to invest capital to maintain or to increase the amount of reserves that we develop and the amount of metal that we produce. We make no assurances that we will be able to maintain our production levels or generate sufficient cash flow, or that we will have access to sufficient financing to continue our production, exploration, permitting and development activities at or above our present levels and we may be required to defer all or a portion of our future capital expenditures. Our business, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected if we cannot make such capital expenditures.

The New Prosperity Project will require substantial financing, including a possible combination of debt and equity financing. On May 12, 2010, the Company entered into a gold stream transaction agreement with Franco-Nevada Corporation (“Franco-Nevada”), whereby the Company may receive funding in staged deposits totalling US$350 million. The investment by Franco-Nevada is subject to (among other conditions) the condition precedent that the New Prosperity project plan that we had agreed with them must receive appropriate governmental approval. Because our revised New Prosperity project plan is not the one we agreed with Franco-Nevada in 2010, this condition will not be satisfied, and so Franco-Nevada may currently terminate this agreement on ten business days’ written notice to Taseko. However, we believe Franco-Nevada currently has no economic incentive to do so. If our revised mine proposal is ultimately accepted by the authorities, we intend to seek Franco-Nevada’s agreement to reconfirm the terms of our gold stream transaction with them, but there is no assurance that Franco-Nevada will agree to provide such reconfirmation. The investment by Franco-Nevada is also subject to certain other conditions precedent which the Company may not be able to satisfy. There can be no assurance that gold stream, debt or equity financing will be available on acceptable terms. Other risks include those typical of large mine development projects, including the general uncertainties inherent in engineering and construction costs, the need to comply with generally increasing environmental regulation, opposition by First Nations and environmental groups, and accommodation of local and community concerns. The economics of the feasibility study are sensitive to the US dollar and Canadian dollar exchange rate, and this rate has been subject to large fluctuations in the last several years.


- 61 -

Our ability to operate our company efficiently could be impaired if we lose key personnel or fail to continue to attract qualified personnel.

We manage our business with a number of key personnel at each location, including key contractors, the loss of a number of whom could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, as our business develops and expands, we believe that our future success will depend greatly on our continued ability to attract and retain highly-skilled and qualified personnel and contractors. We cannot be certain that key personnel will continue to be employed by us or that we will be able to attract and retain qualified personnel and contractors in the future. Failure to retain or attract key personnel could have a material adverse effect on us.

Increased competition and poor mining capital markets could adversely affect our ability to attract necessary capital funding, could increase project development costs, and could adversely affect our ability to acquire suitable mineral properties for development in the future.

The mining industry is intensely competitive. Significant competition exists for the acquisition of properties producing or capable of producing copper, gold or other metals. We may be at a competitive disadvantage in acquiring additional mining properties because we must compete with other individuals and companies, many of which have greater financial resources, operational experience and technical capabilities than we do. We may also encounter increasing competition from other mining companies in our efforts to hire experienced mining professionals. Increased competition could adversely affect our ability to attract necessary capital funding, or to acquire it on acceptable terms, or acquire suitable producing properties or prospects for mineral exploration in the future.

Increased demand for and cost of services and equipment could cause project costs to increase materially, resulting in delays if services or equipment cannot be obtained in a timely manner due to inadequate availability, and increased potential for scheduling difficulties and cost increases due to the need to coordinate the availability of services or equipment, any of which could materially increase project exploration, development or construction costs, result in project delays, or both.

Shareholder Activism

The Company has in the past been subject to and may in the future become the target of shareholder activist activities. The effects of shareholder activist activities could have a negative effect on the Company and its business. The Company cannot predict with certainty the outcome of any future shareholder activist activities.


- 62 -

DIVIDENDS

The Company has not paid dividends to date and the Company has no plans to pay a dividend in the foreseeable future.

DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE

Share Capital

Taseko’s share capital consists of an unlimited number of no par value common shares. As of March 15, 2017, there were 224,147,134 common shares and 5,000,000 share purchase warrants issued and outstanding. All shares are required by law to be issued only as fully paid and non-assessable.

The holders of Taseko’s common shares are entitled to one vote for each share on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders.

There have been no changes in the classification of common shares (reclassifications, consolidations, reverse splits or the like) within the previous five years. All common shares of Taseko rank pari passu (i.e. equally) for the payment of any dividends and distributions in the event of a wind-up.

There are no constraints imposed on the foreign ownership of securities of Taseko, however an acquisition of control of Taseko by a non-Canadian would be subject to a review by the Canadian government under its foreign investment laws if the aggregate acquisition price were to exceed certain thresholds all of which are much higher than the Company’s current implied value.

Senior Notes

In April 2011, the Company completed a public offering of US$200 million in senior unsecured notes (the “Notes”). The Notes mature on April 15, 2019 and bear interest at a fixed annual rate of 7.75%, payable semi-annually. The Notes are unsecured obligations guaranteed by the Company’s subsidiaries and the subsidiary guarantees are, in turn, guaranteed by the Company. The Notes are redeemable by the Company at a price equal to 101.938%, and the redemption price declines to 100% after April 2017. The Notes are also repayable upon a change of control at a price of 101%. There are no maintenance covenants with respect to the Company's financial performance. However, the Company is subject to certain restrictions on asset sales, incurrence of additional indebtedness, issuance of preferred stock, dividends and other payment restrictions.


- 63 -

Secured Credit Facility

On January 29, 2016, the Company entered into a US$70 million Senior Secured Credit Facility (the “Credit Facility”) with EXP T1 Ltd., an affiliate of Red Kite. The Credit Facility consists of an initial tranche of US$33.2 million which has been used to repay the Curis secured loan, and the remainder of the Credit Facility was drawn down in the second quarter of 2016, and is being used by the Company for general corporate purposes. Amounts drawn under the Credit Facility accrue interest on a monthly basis at a rate of three-month Libor plus 7.5% per annum, subject to a minimum Libor of 1% per annum. The loan principal and all accrued interest is payable upon maturity of the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility was subject to an up-front arrangement fee of 2.5% paid by Taseko and there are no commitment fees on any undrawn portion of the facility. The Credit Facility matures on March 29, 2019, as the Company exercised its option and paid an extension fee in June 2016. The Credit Facility is repayable without penalty at any time and does not impose any off-take obligations on the Company.

The Credit Facility is secured by a first priority charge over Taseko’s assets, including the Company’s 75% joint venture interest in the Gibraltar Mine, shares in all material subsidiaries and the Florence Copper Project assets. The Credit Facility is subject to conditions and covenants, including maintenance of a minimum working capital balance of US$20 million. The Company’s balance of working capital (as defined in the Credit Facility agreement) was approximately US$40 million at December 31, 2016.

In connection with the Credit Facility, the Company has issued a call option for 7,500 tonnes of copper with a strike price of US$2.04 per pound. The call option matures in March 2019 and an amount will be payable to Red Kite based on the average copper price during the month of March 2019, subject to a maximum amount of US$15 million.

The Company also issued share purchase warrants to acquire 4 million common shares of the Company at any time until May 9, 2019 at an exercise price of $0.51 per share in connection with the Credit Facility. In February 2017, the Company issued 2 million common shares to Red Kite for proceeds of $1.0 million, upon the partial exercise of warrants that were issued in connection with the Credit Facility.

Ratings

The following table sets out the ratings of Taseko’s senior notes by the rating agencies indicated as at March 15, 2017:

  Rating Agency
  Standard & Poor’s Rating Services Moody’s Investor Services
Senior Notes B- Caa1
Trend / Outlook Stable Stable

Standard & Poor’s Rating Services’ (“S&P”) credit ratings are on a long-term rating scale that ranges from AAA to D, which represents the range from highest to lowest quality of such securities rated. S&P has assigned Taseko a corporate credit rating of B-/Stable. According to S&P, this rating generally means the relevant issuer is vulnerable, but currently has the capacity to meet its financial commitments. Adverse business, financial, or economic conditions will likely impair the capacity or willingness to meet its financial commitments. The stable outlook reflects S&P’s expectation that the Company will have sufficient source of liquidity to fund its operations at least over the next 12 months. The ratings from AAA to D may be modified by the addition of a plus (+) or a minus (-) sign to show relative standing within the major categories. In addition, S&P may add a rating outlook of “positive”, “negative” or “stable” which assesses the potential direction of a long-term credit rating over the intermediate term (typically six months to two years).


- 64 -

Moody’s Investor Services’ (“Moody’s”) credit ratings are on a long-term debt rating scale that ranges from AAA to Caa, which represents the range from highest to lowest quality of such securities rated. Moody’s has assigned Taseko a corporate family credit rating of B3 and a credit rating of Caa1 on the senior notes. According to Moody’s this rating generally means that the obligations are considered to be speculative and are subject to high credit risk. Moody’s appends numerical modifiers 1, 2 and 3 to each generic rating classification from AA through C. The modifier 1 indicates that the security ranks in the higher end of its generic rating category, the modifier 2 indicates a mid-range ranking and the modifier 3 indicates a ranking in the lower end of the generic category.

The credit ratings accorded to the senior notes by S&P and Moody’s are not recommendations to purchase, hold or sell the senior notes as such ratings do not comment as to market price or suitability for a particular investor. There is no assurance that any rating will remain in effect for any given period of time or that any rating will not be revised or withdrawn entirely by a rating agency in the future if, in its judgment, circumstances so warrant.

MARKET FOR SECURITIES

Taseko’s common shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) and the NYSE MKT Exchange under the symbols TKO and TGB, respectively. The following table shows the price ranges and volume traded by month in 2016, based on trading information published by each Exchange.

  Toronto Stock Exchange NYSE MKT Exchange

2016

High (C$)

Low (C$)
Average Daily
Share Volume
High
(US$)

Low (US$)
Average Daily
Share Volume
December 1.32 0.84 647,700 1.00 0.64 815,500
November 0.93 0.60 483,500 0.69 0.45 887,900
October 0.65 0.55 71,100 0.50 0.42 96,600
September 0.68 0.55 57,600 0.51 0.42 157,200
August 0.81 0.58 81,700 0.62 0.44 221,600
July 0.88 0.62 136,900 0.67 0.47 333,300
June 0.70 0.55 64,200 0.55 0.41 142,700
May 0.80 0.60 70,500 0.64 0.45 211,700
April 0.88 0.61 122,400 0.70 0.47 348,400
March 0.79 0.48 356,100 0.61 0.35 424,500
February 0.55 0.44 158,100 0.39 0.31 170,700
January 0.54 0.35 125,900 0.39 0.23 846,500


- 65 -

DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

As at March 15, 2017, the directors and executive officers of Taseko, as a group, beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, or exercised control or direction over 9,845,995 common shares, representing less than five percent of the total number of common shares outstanding before giving effect to the exercise of options to purchase common shares held by such directors and executive officers. The statement as to the number of common shares beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, or over which control or direction is exercised by the directors and executive officers of Taseko as a group is based upon information furnished by the directors and officers as reflected on SEDI (www.sedi.com).

Name, Position and Office, and Period a Director and/or
Province or State and Country of Residence Officer of Taseko
   
Directors  
   
William P. Armstrong, Director
Ladysmith, British Columbia, Canada
Since May 2006
   
Geoffrey Burns, Director
North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Since May 2016
   
Robert A. Dickinson, Director
Lions Bay, British Columbia, Canada
Since January 1991
   
Russell E. Hallbauer, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
West Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Since July 2005
   
Alex Morrison, Director
Castle Pines, Colorado, USA
Since April 2011
   
Richard Mundie, Director
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Since January 2010
   
Ronald W. Thiessen, Chairman of the Board and Director
West Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Since October 1993
   
Linda Thorstad, Director
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Since August 2014
   
Executive Officers  
   
Brian Battison, Vice President Corporate Affairs
Tsawwassen, British Columbia, Canada
Since September 2007
   
Brian Bergot, Vice President, Investor Relations
North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Since March 2014
   
Scott Jones, Vice President, Engineering
North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Since December 2007
   
John W. McManus, Chief Operating Officer
West Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Since October 2005
   
Stuart McDonald, Chief Financial Officer
North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Since September 2013


- 66 -

Name, Position and Office, and Period a Director and/or
Province or State and Country of Residence Officer of Taseko
   
Robert Rotzinger, Vice President, Capital Projects
West Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Since December 2012
   
Trevor Thomas, Secretary
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Since August 2008

At the annual general meeting held in July 2016, all the directors listed above, were re-elected as directors. All directors have a term of office expiring at the next annual general meeting of Taseko, which is currently scheduled for June 2017.

All officers have a term of office lasting until their removal or replacement by the Board of Directors. However, there are certain employment agreements in place with respect to these persons which will affect any termination of services.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Audit and Risk Committee

The Audit and Risk Committee is comprised of Richard Mundie (Chair), Geoffrey Burns, and Alex Morrison.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee is comprised of Alex Morrison (Chair), William P. Armstrong, and Richard Mundie.

Nominating and Governance Committee

The Nominating and Governance Committee is comprised of Linda Thorstad (Chair), Alex Morrison and Richard Mundie.

Environmental, Health and Safety Committee

The Environmental, Health and Safety Committee is comprised of William P. Armstrong (Chair), Robert A. Dickinson, Geoffrey Burns, and Linda Thorstad.

Principal Occupations and Other Information

William P. Armstrong, P.Eng. – Director

Mr. Armstrong earned his Bachelors and Masters Degrees in Geological Engineering from the University of British Columbia and has more than 45 years of experience in the mining industry. He retired from Teck Cominco Ltd., where he was General Manager, Resource Evaluations and was responsible for the evaluation of potential acquisitions and divestitures. He was also responsible for the company’s mineral reserves and resources. During his career with Cominco Ltd., and Teck Cominco Ltd., Mr. Armstrong was involved in feasibility studies, construction and


- 67 -

operation of a large number of mines, including coal deposits, underground and open pit base metal mines and precious metal mines.

Mr. Armstrong is, or within the past five years was, an officer and/or director of the following public companies:

Company Positions Held From To
Euromax Resources Ltd. Director October 2011 February 2012
Atlantic Gold Corporation Director September 2013 Present
Taseko Mines Limited Director May 2006 Present

Geoffrey Burns, MBA, B.Sc. – Director

Mr. Burns brings over thirty years of senior management experience in the mining industry to Taseko. He is currently the Chairman of Maverix Metals Inc. and until December 2015 was the President, CEO and a Director at Pan American Silver Corp. (“PASC”). During his 12 year tenure at PASC, the company increased its silver production from 7.5 million ounces to over 26 million ounces annually to become the second largest primary silver producer in the world. He has extensive experience throughout North and South America in mine operations and project development having participated in numerous mine construction projects from feasibility study into continuous operation. He has also led numerous capital market transactions including placements of equity, debt and convertible debt, and he was instrumental in completing several cornerstone acquisitions for PASC. Mr. Burns holds a B.Sc. Majors degree in Geology from McMaster University, and an MBA from York University

Mr. Burns is, or within the past five years was, an officer and/or director of the following public companies:

Company Positions Held From To
Maverix Metals Inc. Director and Chairman January 2012 Present
Pan America Silver Corp. Director July 2003 December 2015
President and CEO May 2004 December 2015
Taseko Mines Limited Director May 2016 Present

Robert A. Dickinson, B.Sc., M.Sc. – Director

Mr. Dickinson is an economic geologist who has been actively involved in mineral exploration and mine development for over 45 years and was inducted into the Canadian Mining Hall of Fame in 2012. He is Chairman of HDI and HDSI as well as a director and member of the management team of a number of public companies associated with HDSI. He is also President and Director of United Mineral Services Ltd., a private resources company. He also serves as a Director of Britannia Mine Museum and Trustee of the BC Mineral Resources Education Program.


- 68 -

Mr. Dickinson is, or within the past five years was, an officer and/or director of the following public companies:

Company Positions Held From To
Amarc Resources Ltd. Director April 1993 Present
Chairman April 2004 Present
Curis Resources Ltd. Director November 2010 November 2012
Heatherdale Resources Ltd. Director November 2009 Present
Northcliff Resources Ltd. Director June 2011 Present
Chairman June 2011 January 2013
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. Director June 1994 Present
Chairman April 2004 Present
Quartz Mountain Resources Ltd. Director December 2003 Present
Chairman December 2011 November 2012
Taseko Mines Limited Director January 1991 Present

Russell E. Hallbauer, P.Eng. – Director, President and CEO

Mr. Hallbauer graduated from the Colorado School of Mines with a B.Sc. in Mining Engineering in 1979. He is a Registered Professional Engineer with the Association of Professional Engineers of British Columbia. He has been a member of the Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy since 1975 and is a director and former chairman of the Mining Association of B.C.

In 1983, he joined Teck Corporation’s Bullmoose mine, advancing through Engineering and Supervisory positions to become Mine Superintendent in 1987, and in 1992, became General Manager of Quintette. In 1995, he assumed new responsibilities in Vancouver when he was appointed General Manager, Coal Operations, overseeing Teck’s three operating coal mines in the Province. In 2002, he was appointed General Manager, Base Metal Joint Ventures, responsible for Teck Cominco’s interests in Highland Valley Copper, Antamina in Peru, and Louvicourt in Quebec. Mr. Hallbauer is a director of HDSI (and HDI), a company providing management and administrative services to several publicly-traded companies (including Taseko), and focuses on directing corporate development and financing activities.

Mr. Hallbauer is, or within the past five years was, an officer and/or director of the following public companies:


- 69 -

Company Positions Held From To
Curis Resources Ltd. Chairman December 2010 September 2012
Co-Chairman September 2012 November 2014
Director November 2010 November 2014
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. Director April 2008 February 2016
Taseko Mines Limited President/CEO/Director July 2005 Present

Alexander Morrison, CPA, CA - Director

Mr. Morrison is a mining executive and Chartered Professional Accountant with over 25 years of experience in the mining industry.

Mr. Morrison is a citizen of the United States and is a resident of the state of Colorado.

Mr. Morrison has held senior executive positions with a number of mining companies, most recently serving as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Franco-Nevada Corporation from 2007 to 2010. From 2002 to 2007, Mr. Morrison held increasingly senior positions at Newmont Mining Corporation, including Vice President, Operations Services and Vice President, Information Technology. Prior to that, Mr. Morrison was Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of NovaGold Resources Inc., Vice President and Controller of Homestake Mining Company and held senior financial positions at Phelps Dodge Corporation and Stillwater Mining Company. Mr. Morrison began his career with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP after obtaining his Bachelor of Arts in Business Administration from Trinity Western University.

Mr. Morrison is, or within the past five years was, an officer and/or director of the following public companies:

Company Positions Held From To
Detour Gold Corporation Director May 2010 Present
Pershing Gold Corporation Director November 2012 Present
Gold Resource Corporation Director March 2016 Present
Taseko Mines Limited Director April 2011 Present

Richard Mundie, CPA, CA – Director

Mr. Mundie is a Chartered Professional Accountant with a Bachelor of Commerce degree from the University of British Columbia. Mr. Mundie has held a number of senior leadership positions in the mining sector for over 40 years in key organizations in British Columbia and overseas. From 2005 to 2007, he was Vice President, Asia Affairs and Chief Representative (China), for Teck Cominco Limited. In this role, he was active in the international mining community and participated in several joint programs to build stronger relationships with the Chinese Government.


- 70 -

Mr. Mundie also held the position of Vice President – Commercial for a period of ten years with Teck Cominco. In this role, he was responsible for marketing the company’s commercial mineral products, gaining invaluable experience in Europe, South America, United States, Japan, Korea, and Taiwan.

Between 1983 and 1995, he held a number of financial and leadership positions with Cominco and in 1992, he assumed the role of Director of Business Development with wide responsibilities for mergers, acquisitions and divestitures. Earlier career positions included a number of finance related roles in the resources sector, transport and public accounting with PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP.

Mr. Mundie is, or within the past five years was, an officer and/or director of the following public companies:

Company Positions Held From To
Panoro Minerals Ltd. Director March 2010 September 2016
Taseko Mines Limited Director January 2010 Present

Ronald W. Thiessen, CPA, FCA – Chairman of the Board and Director

Mr. Thiessen is a Chartered Professional Accountant with professional experience in finance, taxation, mergers, acquisitions and re-organizations. Since 1986, Mr. Thiessen has been involved in the acquisition and financing of mining and mineral exploration companies. Mr. Thiessen’s is a director of HDSI (and HDI), a company providing management and administrative services to several publicly-traded companies (including Taseko), and focuses on directing corporate development and financing activities.

Mr. Thiessen is, or within the past five years was, an officer and/or director of the following public companies:

Company Positions Held From To
Amarc Resources Ltd. Director September 1995 Present
President and Chief Executive Officer September 2000 Present
Detour Gold Corporation Director July 2006 May 2012
Great Basin Gold Ltd. Director October 1993 June 2013
Chairman November 2006 June 2013


- 71 -

Company Positions Held From To
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. Director November 1995 Present
President and Chief Executive Officer November 2001 Present
Quartz Mountain Resources Ltd. Director December 2011 Present
President and Chief Executive Officer December 2011 Present
Taseko Mines Limited Director October 1993 Present
Chairman May 2006 Present

Linda Thorstad, MSc, P.Geo., FEC (Hon), FGC - Director

Ms. Thorstad is a registered professional geoscientist and has over 35 years of senior management experience in the mining industry. Her experience spans exploration and development companies as well as key roles with mid-tier producers. Ms. Thorstad served as the Director, Government and Community Relations and Permitting at Alamos Gold until April 2015. Prior to Alamos, she was the President and Chief Executive Officer of Orsa Ventures until it was acquired by Alamos Gold in 2013. Additionally, she has been involved in two special government commissions focused on sustainability, land use, resource and environmental management. Ms. Thorstad is the past President of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of British Columbia, a Founding Member of the Canadian Council of Professional Engineers (now Geoscience Canada) and Honorary Fellow of Engineers Canada.

Ms. Thorstad is, or within the past five years was, a director of the following public companies:

Company Positions Held From To
Orsa Ventures Corporation Director August 2008 September 2013
Taseko Mines Ltd. Director August 2014 Present

Brian Battison – Vice President, Corporate Affairs

Mr. Battison is responsible for all matters relating to corporate and public affairs, including government and community relations and external communications. Mr. Battison has many years of experience in both the private and public sectors specializing in policy and program development, strategic planning and issue management.


- 72 -

Company Positions Held From To
Taseko Mines Limited Vice President, Corporate Affairs September 2007 Present

Brian Bergot – Vice President, Investor Relations

Mr. Bergot was appointed Vice President, Investor Relations in March 2014 and has over 20 years of experience in the natural resources sector. Brian joined Taseko in 2006 and has held roles of increasing responsibility, in both Investor Relations and Marketing & Logistics. Prior to his career in mining, Mr. Bergot spent 14 years at Methanex Corporation, a $7 billion BC-based chemical company. At Methanex, he held a number of corporate and operational roles including investor relations and marketing & logistics. As Vice President, Investor Relations, he is responsible for expanding the Company’s shareholder base in the North American and European markets.

Mr. Bergot is, or within the past five years was, an officer and or director of the following public companies:

Company Positions Held From To
Western Lithium USA Corporation Vice President, Investor Relations April 2011 February 2012
Taseko Mines Limited Vice President, Investor Relations March 2014 Present

Scott Jones, P.Eng. – Vice President, Engineering

Mr. Jones has 35 years of experience in the mining industry. Prior to joining Taseko in 2006, he was a Senior Mining Engineer for Teck Cominco where he was involved in property valuation and feasibility studies. He has also held various senior positions in both underground and open pit operations for Teck Cominco and at Barrick Gold’s Hemlo Operations. He has a B.Sc. in Mine Engineering from McGill University.

Company Positions Held From To
Taseko Mines Limited Vice President, Engineering December 2007 Present

John McManus, P. Eng. – Chief Operating Officer

Mr. McManus holds a Bachelor of Science degree in mining engineering from the Colorado School of Mines and a Technologist Diploma in Mining from the British Columbia Institute of Technology.


- 73 -

Mr. McManus has worked in the mining industry in British Columbia for over 30 years where he gained experience in mine operations, mine engineering and environmental management. Prior to joining Taseko in 2005, he was the General Manager, Coal Mountain Operations at Elk Valley Coal Corporation. Before that, Mr. McManus was the Mine Manager at Teck Cominco’s coal mining joint venture Bullmoose operation, General Superintendent at the Elkview coal mine and Superintendent of Engineering at the Quintette operation. His past experience also includes five years working in operations and engineering at the Highland Valley and Lornex copper mines and three years working in gold exploration in the Yukon, British Columbia and California.

Mr. McManus is, or within the past five years was, an officer and or director of the following public companies:

Company Positions Held From To
Taseko Mines Limited Vice President, Operations October 2005 December 2007
Senior Vice President, Operations December 2007 December 2013
Chief Operating Officer December 2013 Present

Stuart McDonald, CPA, CA – Chief Financial Officer

Mr. McDonald is a Chartered Professional Accountant with a Bachelor of Commerce (Finance) degree from the University of British Columbia. Prior to his role with Taseko, Mr. McDonald held executive positions with several companies in the mining industry. He was most recently Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of Yukon Zinc Corp., a privately owned Canadian mining company, until January 2013. Prior to this position he was Chief Financial Officer of Quadra FNX Mining Ltd. (and its predecessor Quadra Mining Ltd.) from 2007 to 2010. He was also Corporate Controller at Cumberland Resources Ltd., from 2004 until its acquisition by Agnico-Eagle Mines in 2007. Prior to joining the mining industry, he was a Senior Manager at Deloitte & Touche LLP and also spent three years as an Audit Manager with Ernst & Young in the Czech Republic.

Company Positions Held From To
Taseko Mines Limited Chief Financial Officer September 2013 Present

Robert Rotzinger, P. Eng. – Vice-President, Capital Projects

Mr. Rotzinger has over 20 years of experience in the mining industry with Taseko and predecessor companies. Mr. Rotzinger has been a key participant in the $700 million capital investment program at the Gibraltar Mine including managing the engineering, construction and commissioning of the three phase mine expansion project. In 2014, he was the recipient of the Canadian Mineral Processors Society “Mineral Processor of the Year Award” and in 2010, he was a co-recipient of the Association of Mineral Exploration British Columbia E.A. Scholz Award for Excellence in Mine Development for the expansion and modernization of the Gibraltar Mine. He has also received PowerSmart Excellence Awards from BC Hydro in 2008 for Outstanding Energy Efficient Project and again in 2010 for the Application of New Energy Efficient Technology.


- 74 -

Company Positions Held From To
Taseko Mines Limited Vice President, Capital Projects December 2012 Present

Trevor Thomas, LLB – Secretary

Mr. Thomas has practiced in the areas of corporate commercial, corporate finance, securities and mining law since 1995, both in private practice environment as well as in-house positions and is currently general counsel for Hunter Dickinson Inc. Prior to joining Hunter Dickinson Inc. he served as in-house legal counsel with Placer Dome Inc.

Mr. Thomas is, or within the past five years was, an officer and or director of the following public companies:

Company Positions Held From To
Amarc Resources Ltd. Secretary February 2008 Present
Curis Resources Ltd. Secretary June 2013 November 2014
Heatherdale Resources Ltd. Secretary July 2013 Present
Northcliff Resources Ltd. Secretary June 2011 Present
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. Secretary February 2008 Present
Quartz Mountain Resources Ltd. Secretary June 2013 Present
Rathdowney Resources Ltd. Secretary March 2011 Present
Rockwell Diamonds Inc. Secretary February 2008 September 2012
Taseko Mines Limited Secretary August 2008 Present

Cease Trade Orders, Bankruptcies, Penalties or Sanctions

No director or executive officer of Taseko is as of the date of this AIF, or has been within the 10 years before the date of this AIF, a director or executive officer of any company that was the subject of a cease trade order or similar penalty or sanction while that person was acting in that capacity, or was the subject of a cease trade order or similar penalty or sanction after the director or executive officer ceased to act in that capacity and which resulted from any event that occurred while that person was acting in the capacity of a director or executive officer.


- 75 -

Except as disclosed below, no director or executive officer of the Company, or a shareholder holding a sufficient number of securities of the Company to affect materially control of the Company, (i) is, or within ten years prior to the date hereof has been, a director or executive officer of any company (including the Company) that, while that person was acting in that capacity, or within a year of that person ceasing to act in that capacity, became bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency or was subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold its assets, or (ii) has, within ten years prior to the date hereof, become bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency, or become subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors, or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold the assets of the director, executive officer or shareholder.

As publicly disclosed at www.sedar.com , Great Basin Gold Ltd. (“GBG”), a company on whose board Ronald W. Thiessen served became insolvent and was liquidated commencing in 2012. GBG was developing two gold projects using substantial debt financing when gold prices began their precipitous fall. Mr. Thiessen resigned on June 30, 2013.

No director or executive officer of the Company, or a shareholder holding a sufficient number of securities of the Company to affect materially the control of the Company, has been subject to (i) any penalties or sanctions imposed by a court relating to securities legislation or by a securities regulatory authority or has entered into a settlement agreement with a securities regulatory authority; or (ii) any other penalties or sanctions imposed by a court or regulatory body that would likely be considered important to a reasonable investor in making an investment decision.

Potential Conflicts of Interest

Several directors of Taseko also serve as directors of one or more other resource companies involved in mineral exploration and/or development. It may occur from time to time that as a consequence of their activity in the mineral industry and serving on such other boards that a director may become aware of potential resource property opportunities which are of interest to more than one of the companies on whose boards that person serves. Furthermore, it is possible that the directors of Taseko and the directors of one or more such other companies may also agree to allow joint participation on Taseko’s properties or the properties of that other company. Accordingly, situations may arise in the ordinary course which involves a director in an actual or potential conflict of interest as well as issues in connection with the general obligation of a director to make corporate opportunities available to the company on which the director serves. In all such events, any director who might have a disclosable financial interest in a contract or transaction by virtue of office, employment or security holdings or other such interest in another company or in a property interest under consideration by the Taseko Board, would be obliged to abstain from voting as a Taseko director in respect of any transaction involving that other company(s) or in respect of any property in which an interest is held by him. The directors will use their best business judgment to help avoid situations where conflicts or corporate opportunity issues might arise and they must at all times fulfill their duties to act honestly and in the best interests of Taseko.


- 76 -

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND REGULATORY ACTIONS

The Company has not been subject to any securities regulatory authority or other regulatory authority or court penalty or sanction.

INTEREST OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS IN MATERIAL TRANSACTIONS

None of the directors or senior officers of the Company, nor any person who has held such a position since the beginning of the last completed financial year end of the Company, nor any associate or affiliate of the foregoing persons, has any substantial or material interest, direct or indirect, by way of beneficial ownership of securities or otherwise, in any material transaction of the Company other than as set out herein.

Three directors of the Company (Robert Dickinson, Ronald Thiessen and Russell Hallbauer) are also principals of Hunter Dickinson Services Inc. (“HDSI”), a private company. HDSI invoices the Company for their executive services (director fees) and for other services provided by HDSI. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company incurred total costs of $1.4 million (2015: $2.4 million) in transactions with HDSI. Of these, $0.6 million (2015: $0.9 million) related to administrative, legal, exploration and tax services, $0.5 million related to reimbursements of office rent costs (2015: $0.5 million), and $0.3 million (2015: $0.3 million) related to director fees for two Taseko directors who are also principals of HDSI. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company also incurred costs of $0.8 million through HDSI related to compensation of Taseko’s CEO who is also a principal of HDSI.

TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR

The Company’s registrar and transfer agent for its common shares is Computershare Investor Services Inc. at its offices in Vancouver, British Columbia.

MATERIAL CONTRACTS

The following contracts are considered material and have been filed at www.sedar.com:

(a)

Joint Venture Operating Agreement with Cariboo, dated March 18, 2010, whereby the Gibraltar Mine is operated in a 75:25 joint venture with Cariboo;

   
(b)

Indenture, dated as of April 15, 2011, between the Company, as issuer and Parent Guarantor, Gibraltar Mines Ltd., as Subsidiary Guarantor, and Aley Corporation, as Subsidiary Guarantor, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as U.S. trustee, and BNY Trust Company of Canada, as Canadian Co-Trustee; and

   
(c)

Senior Secured Facility Agreement between Taseko Mines Limited, as Borrower, Gibraltar Mines Ltd. as an additional loan party and EXP T1 Ltd., as lender dated January 29, 2016.



- 77 -

INTERESTS OF EXPERTS

The following is a list of the persons or companies named as having prepared or certified a statement, report or valuation, in this AIF either directly or in a document incorporated by reference and whose profession or business gives authority to the statement, report or valuation made by the person or company:

(a)        The Company’s independent auditors are KPMG LLP, Chartered Professional Accountants, who have issued independent auditors’ reports dated February 21, 2017 in respect of the Company’s consolidated financial statements as at December 31, 2016 and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 and the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016;

(b)        Scott Jones, P. Eng. authored the “Technical Report on the 357 Million Ton Increase in Mineral Reserves at the Gibraltar Mine” dated June 24, 2011;

(c)        Scott Jones, P. Eng. authored the “Technical Report on the 344 million tonne increase in mineral reserves at the Prosperity Gold – Copper Project” dated December 17, 2009;

(d)        Ronald G. Simpson, P.Geo. co-authored the “Technical Report on Mineral Reserves at the Aley Project” dated October 30, 2014 and the “Technical Report Aley Carbonatite Niobium Project” dated March 29, 2012;

(e)        Scott Jones, P. Eng. co-authored the “Technical Report on Mineral Reserves at the Aley Project” dated October 30, 2014;

(f)        Robert Rotzinger, P. Eng. co-authored the “Technical Report on Mineral Reserves at the Aley Project” dated October 30, 2014;

(g)        Keith Merriam, P. Eng. co-authored the “Technical Report on Mineral Reserves at the Aley Project” dated October 30, 2014;

(h)        Greg Yelland, P. Eng. co-authored the “Technical Report on Mineral Reserves at the Aley Project” dated October 30, 2014;

(i)        Scott Jones, P. Eng. authored the “Technical Report on the Mineral Reserve Update at the Gibraltar Mine” dated June 15, 2015; and

(j)        Dan Johnson, P.E., RM-SME authored the “NI 43-101 Technical Report, Florence Copper Project, Florence, Pinal County, Arizona” dated February 28, 2017.

To our knowledge, Scott Jones, Ronald G. Simpson, Robert Rotzinger, Keith Merriam, Greg Yelland and Dan Johnson do not hold, directly or indirectly, more than 1% of our issued and outstanding common shares.

KPMG are the auditors of the Company and have confirmed that they are independent of the Company within the meaning of the relevant rules and related interpretations prescribed by the relevant professional bodies in Canada and any applicable legislation or regulation and also that they are independent accountants with respect to the Company under all relevant US professional and regulatory standards.


- 78 -

Based on information provided by the relevant persons, and except as otherwise disclosed in this AIF, none of the persons or companies referred to above has received or will receive any direct or indirect interests in our property or the property of an associated party or an affiliate of ours or have any beneficial ownership, direct or indirect, of our securities or of an associated party or an affiliate of ours.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Additional information, including additional financial information, directors’ and officers’ remuneration, indebtedness of officers, executive stock options and interests of management and others in material transactions, where applicable, is contained in annual financial statements, MD&A, proxy circulars and interim financial statements available at the SEDAR internet web site ( www.sedar.com ).

The following documents can be obtained upon request from Taseko’s Shareholder Communication Department by calling (778) 373-4533:

  I.

this Annual Information Form, together with any document incorporated herein by reference;

     
  II.

the Annual Report of the Company and any interim financial statements filed with Securities Commissions subsequent to the audited financial statements for the Company’s most recently completed financial year; and

     
  III.

the Proxy Circular for the 2016 annual general meeting of the Company dated July 12, 2016.

The Company may require the payment of a reasonable charge from persons, other than security holders of the Company, requesting copies of these documents.

AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE

The Audit and Risk Committee has adopted a charter that sets out its mandate and responsibilities, and is attached to this AIF as Appendix A.

Composition of Audit and Risk Committee

The Audit and Risk Committee, consisting of Richard Mundie, Geoffrey Burns and Alex Morrison, reviews all financial statements of the Company prior to their publication, meets with the auditors as part of their review of audit findings, considers the adequacy of audit procedures, recommends the appointment of independent auditors, reviews and approves the professional services to be rendered by them and reviews fees for audit services. The charter has set criteria for membership which all members of the Audit and Risk Committee are required to meet consistent with National Instrument 52-110 Audit Committees and other applicable regulatory requirements. The Audit and Risk Committee, as needed, meets separately (without management present) with the Company’s auditors to discuss the various aspects of the Company’s financial statements and the independent audit.


- 79 -

Each Audit and Risk Committee member is an independent director and is financially literate. Mr. Mundie is the Audit and Risk Committee’s chairman. Messrs. Morrison, Burns, and Mundie are financial experts.

Relevant Education and Experience

Disclosure respecting the education and experience of the Audit and Risk Committee is provided in their biographies above. As a result of their education and experience, each member of the Audit Committee has familiarity with, an understanding of, or experience in:

Code of Ethics

The Company has adopted a code of ethics that applies to all directors, officers and employees of the Company, including the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other senior finance staff. A copy of the Code of Ethics, which is included as a part of the Company’s Governance Policies and Procedures Manual, is available on the Company’s website at www.tasekomines.com and at the SEDAR internet web site www.sedar.com .

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The following table discloses the aggregate fees billed for each of the last two years for professional services rendered by the Company’s audit firm for various services.

  Year ended Year ended
Services December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
Audit Fees $ 476,000 $ 516,500
Audit Related Fees 1
Tax Fees
All Other Fees
     
Total $ 476,000 $ 516,500

(1) “Audit-Related Fees” include services that are traditionally performed by the auditor.


- 80 -

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Management of the Company requests approval from the Audit and Risk Committee for all audit and non-audit services to be provided by the Company’s auditors. The Audit and Risk Committee pre-approves all such services with set maximum dollar amounts for each itemized service. During such deliberations, the Audit and Risk Committee assesses, among other factors, whether the services requested would be considered “prohibited services” as contemplated under Canadian independence standards and by the US Securities and Exchange Commission, and whether the services requested and the fees related to such services could impair the independence of the auditors. No audit-related fees, tax fees or other non-audit fees for such “prohibited services” were approved by the Audit and Risk Committee.


APPENDIX A

Audit and Risk Committee Charter

1. Purpose: Responsibilities and Authority

The Audit and Risk Committee (the “Audit Committee” or “Committee”) shall carry out its responsibilities under applicable laws, regulations and stock exchange requirements with respect to the employment, compensation and oversight of the Company’s independent auditor, and other matters under the authority of the Committee. The Committee also shall assist the Board of Directors in carrying out its oversight responsibilities relating to the Company’s financial, accounting and reporting processes, the Company’s system of internal accounting and financial controls, the Company’s compliance with related legal and regulatory requirements, and the fairness of transactions between the Company and related parties. In furtherance of this purpose, the Committee shall have the following responsibilities and authority:

  (a)

Relationship with Independent Auditor.

(i)        Subject to the law of British Columbia as to the role of the Shareholders in the appointment of independent auditors, the Committee shall have the sole authority to appoint or replace the independent auditor.

(ii)        The Committee shall be directly responsible for the compensation and oversight of the work of the independent auditor (including resolution of disagreements between management and the independent auditor regarding financial reporting) for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or related work.

(iii)        The independent auditor shall report directly to the Committee.

(iv)        The Committee shall approve in advance all audit and permitted non-audit services with the independent auditor, including the terms of the engagements and the fees payable; provided that the Committee Chairman may approve services to be performed by the independent auditors and the fee therefor between Committee meetings if the amount of the fee does not exceed $50,000, provided that any such approval shall be reported to the Committee at the next meeting thereof. The Committee may delegate to a subcommittee the authority to grant pre-approvals of audit and permitted non-audit services, provided that the decision of any such subcommittee shall be presented to the full Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

(v)        At least annually, the Committee shall review and evaluate the experience and qualifications of the lead partner and senior members of the independent auditor team.

(vi)        At least annually, the Committee shall obtain and review a report from the independent auditor regarding:

(A)        the independent auditor’s internal quality-control procedures;


- 2 -

(B)        any material issues raised by the most recent internal quality-control review, or peer review, of the auditor, or by any inquiry or investigation by governmental or professional authorities within the preceding five years respecting one or more independent audits carried out by the firm;

(C)        any steps taken to deal with any such issues; and

(D)        all relationships between the independent auditor and the Company.

(vii)       At least annually, the Committee shall evaluate the qualifications, performance and independence of the independent auditor, including considering whether the auditor’s quality controls are adequate and the provision of permitted non-audit services is compatible with maintaining the auditor’s independence.

(viii)      The Committee shall ensure the rotation of the lead (or coordinating) audit partner having primary responsibility for the audit, the concurring partner responsible for reviewing the audit, and other audit partners as required by law.

(ix)        The Committee shall consider whether, in order to assure continuing auditor independence, it is appropriate to adopt a policy of rotating the independent auditing firm on a regular basis.

(x)        The Committee shall recommend to the Board policies for the Company’s hiring of employees or former employees of the independent auditor who were engaged on the Company’s account or participated in any capacity in the audit of the Company.

(xi)        The Committee shall oversee the implementation by management of appropriate information technology systems for the Company, including as required for proper financial reporting and compliance.

  (b)

Financial Statement and Disclosure Review.

(i)        The Committee shall review and discuss with management and the independent auditor the annual audited financial statements, including disclosures made in management’s discussion and analysis, and recommend to the Board whether the audited financial statements should be filed with applicable securities regulatory authorities and included in the Company’s annual reports.

(ii)        The Committee shall review and discuss with management (and, to the extent the Committee deems it necessary or appropriate, the independent auditor) the Company’s quarterly financial statements, including disclosures made in management’s discussion and analysis, and recommend to the Board whether such financial statements should be filed with applicable securities regulatory authorities.

(iii)        The Committee shall review and discuss with management and the independent auditor significant financial reporting issues and judgments made in connection with the preparation of the Company’s financial statements, including the independent auditor’s assessment of the quality of the Company’s accounting principles, any significant changes in the Company’s selection or application of accounting principles, any major issues as to the adequacy of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting, and any special steps adopted in light of material control deficiencies.


- 3 -

(iv)        At least annually and prior to the publication of annual audited financial statements, the Committee shall review and discuss with management and the independent auditor a report from the independent auditor on:

(A)        all critical accounting policies and practices used by the Company;

(B)        all alternative accounting treatments of financial information that have been discussed with management since the prior report, ramifications of the use of such alternative disclosures and treatments, the treatment preferred by the independent auditor, and an explanation of why the independent auditor’s preferred method was not adopted; and.

(C)        other material written communications between the independent auditor and management since the prior report, such as any management letter or schedule of unadjusted differences, the development, selection and disclosure of critical accounting estimates, and analyses of the effect of alternative assumptions, estimates or GAAP methods on the Company’s financial statements.

(v)        Prior to their filing or issuance, the Committee shall review the Company’s Annual Information Form/Annual Report to the SEC, quarterly and annual earnings press releases, and other financial press releases, including the use of “pro forma” or “adjusted” non-GAAP information.

(vi)        The Committee shall review and discuss with management the financial information and earnings guidance provided to analysts and rating agencies. Such discussion may be specific or it may be in general regarding the types of information to be disclosed and the types of presentations to be made.

(c)        Conduct of the Annual Audit . The Committee shall oversee the annual audit, and in the course of such oversight the Committee shall have the following responsibilities and authority:

(i)        The Committee shall meet with the independent auditor prior to the audit to discuss the planning and conduct of the annual audit, and shall meet with the independent auditor as may be necessary or appropriate in connection with the audit.

(ii)        The Committee shall ascertain that the independent auditor is registered and in good standing with the Canadian Public Accounting Board and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) and that the independent auditor satisfies all applicable Canadian independence standards (Canadian Auditing Standard 200), PCAOB Rule 3526 and SEC Regulation S-X, Section 2-01. The Committee shall obtain from the auditor a written statement description of all relationships between the auditor and the Company and persons in a financial reporting oversight role at the Company as per PCAOB Rule 3526, that may reasonably be thought to bear on independence.


- 4 -

(ii)        The Committee shall discuss with the independent auditor the matters required to be discussed by PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 16 and Canadian Auditing Standard 260 relating to the conduct of the audit.

(iii)        The Committee shall obtain from the independent auditor assurance that the audit was conducted in a manner consistent with Section 10A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that, in the course of conducting the audit, the independent auditor has not become aware of information indicating that an illegal act has or may have occurred or, if such an act may have occurred, that the independent auditor has taken all action required by Section 10A(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

(iv)        The Committee shall make such inquiries to the management and the independent auditor as the Committee members deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy themselves regarding the efficacy of the Company’s financial and internal controls and procedures and the auditing process.

  (d)

Compliance and Oversight.

(i)        The Committee shall meet periodically with management and the independent auditor in separate executive sessions. The Committee may also, to the extent it deems necessary or appropriate, meet with the Company’s investment bankers and financial analysts who follow the Company.

(ii)        The Committee shall discuss with management and the independent auditor the effect of regulatory and accounting initiatives as well as off-balance sheet structures on the Company’s financial statements.

(iii)        The Committee shall discuss with management the Company’s major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures, including the Company’s risk assessment and risk management policies, and regularly review the top risks identified by management and the policies and practices adopted by the Company to mitigate those risks.

(iv)        At least annually and prior to the filing of the AIF/Annual Report to the SEC, the Committee shall review with management and the independent auditor the disclosure controls and procedures and confirm that the Company (with CEO and CFO participation) has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the controls within 90 days prior to the date of filing of the AIF/Annual Report to the SEC. The Committee also shall review with management and the independent auditor any deficiencies in the design and operation of internal controls and significant deficiencies or material weaknesses therein and any fraud involving management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal controls. As a part of that review, the Committee shall review the process followed in preparing and verifying the accuracy of the required CEO and CFO annual certifications.


- 5 -

(v)        At least annually and prior to the filing of the AIF/Annual Report to the SEC, the Committee shall review with management and the independent auditor management’s internal control report and assessment of the internal controls and procedures, and the independent auditor’s report on and assessment of the internal controls and procedures. In connection with its review of interim and annual financial statements and related management’s discussion and analysis, the Committee shall confirm with management that the Company (with CEO and CFO participation) has taken all actions required in connection with the certifications required by National Instrument NI 52-109, Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings.

(vi)        The Committee shall establish procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, and the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters.

(vii)        The Committee shall discuss with management and the independent auditor any correspondence with regulators or governmental agencies and any employee complaints or reports which raise material issues regarding the Company’s financial statements or accounting policies.

(viii)        At least annually, the Committee shall meet with the Company’s legal counsel and discuss any legal matters that may have a material impact on the financial statements or the Company’s compliance policies.

(ix)        The Committee shall oversee the preparation of reports relating to the Audit Committee required under applicable laws, regulations and stock exchange requirements.

(x)        The Committee shall exercise oversight with respect to anti-fraud programs and controls

  (e)

Related Party Transactions.

(i)        The Committee shall review for fairness to the Company proposed transactions, contracts and other arrangements between the Company and its subsidiaries and any related party or affiliate, and make recommendations to the Board whether any such transactions, contracts and other arrangements should be approved or continued. The foregoing shall not include any compensation payable pursuant to any plan, program, contract or arrangement subject to the authority of the Company’s Compensation Committee.

(ii)        As used herein the term “related party” means any officer or director of the Company or any subsidiary, or any shareholder holding a greater than 10% direct or indirect financial or voting interest in the Company, and the term “affiliate” means any person, whether acting alone or in concert with others, that controls, is controlled by or is under common control with another person. "Related party" includes Hunter Dickinson Services Inc., its principals, and their affiliates.


- 6 -

  (f)

Additional duties. The Committee shall perform the following additional duties:

(i)        The Committee shall review and recommend dividend policies.

(ii)        The Committee shall oversee the Company’s insurance program and approve insurance policy limits.

(iii)       The Committee shall review the appointment of senior financial personnel and make recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding the appointment of the Chief Financial Officer.

(iv)        The Committee shall recommend to the Nominating and Governance Committee the qualifications and criteria for membership on the Committee.

(v)        The Committee shall review and discuss with management the requirement for annual public disclosure pursuant to the Extractive Sector Transparency Measures Act and shall be responsible for approving such disclosures.

2.

Structure and Membership

(a)         Number and qualification . The Committee shall consist of three persons unless the Board should from time to time otherwise determine. All members of the Committee shall meet the experience and financial literacy requirements of National Instrument NI 52-110 and the rules of the Toronto Stock Exchange and the NYSE MKT. At least one member of the Committee shall be a “financial expert” as defined in Item 407 of SEC Regulation S-K.

(b)        Selection and Removal . Members of the Committee shall be appointed by the Board, upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Board may remove members of the Committee at any time with or without cause.

(c)         Independence . All of the members of the Committee shall be “independent” as required for audit committees by National Instrument NI 52-110, the rules of the Toronto Stock Exchange and the NYSE MKT, and SEC Rule 10A-3.

(d)         Chair . Unless the Board elects a Chair of the Committee, the Committee shall elect a Chair by majority vote.

(e)         Compensation . The compensation of the Committee shall be as determined by the Board.

(f)        Term . Members of the Committee shall be appointed for one-year terms. Each member shall serve until his or her replacement is appointed, or until he or she resigns or is removed from the Board or the Committee.

3.

Procedures and Administration



- 7 -

(a)        Meetings . The Committee shall meet as often as it deems necessary in order to perform its responsibilities, but not less than quarterly. The Committee shall keep minutes of its meetings and any other records as it deems appropriate.

(b)         Subcommittees . The Committee may form and delegate authority to one or more subcommittees, consisting of at least one member, as it deems appropriate from time to time under the circumstances.

(c)         Reports to the Board . The Committee shall regularly report to the Board with respect to such matters as are relevant to the Committee’s discharge of its responsibilities, and shall report in writing on request of the Chairman of the Board.

(d)         Charter . The Committee shall, at least annually, review and reassess the adequacy of this Charter and recommend any proposed changes to the Board for approval.

(e)         Independent Advisors . The Committee shall have the authority to engage such independent legal and other advisors as it deems necessary or appropriate to carry out its responsibilities. Such independent advisors may be regular advisors to the Company. The Committee is empowered, without further action by the Board, to cause the Company to pay appropriate compensation to advisors engaged by the Committee.

(f)         Investigations . The Committee shall have the authority to conduct or authorize investigations into any matters within the scope of its responsibilities as it deems appropriate, including the authority to request any Officer or other person to meet with the Committee and to access all Company records.

(g)         Annual Self-Evaluation . The Committee shall evaluate its own performance at least annually.

4.

Additional Powers

The Committee shall have such other duties as may be delegated from time to time by the Board of Directors.

5.

Limitation of Committee’s Role

While the Committee has the responsibilities and powers set forth in this Charter, it is not the duty of the Committee to plan or conduct audits or to determine that the Company’s financial statements and disclosures are complete and accurate and are in accordance with GAAP and applicable rules and regulations. These are the responsibilities of management and the independent auditor.

6.

Committee Member Independence, Financial Literacy and Financial Expert Requirements


A.

Independence

See Appendix 2 of the Company’s Corporate Governance Overview and Guidelines.


- 8 -

B.

Financial Literacy and Financial Expert Requirements

NI 52-110

Section 3.1(4) states that each audit committee member must be financially literate.

Section 1.6 defines the meaning of financial literacy as follows:

“For the purposes of this Instrument, an individual is financially literate if he or she has the ability to read and understand a set of financial statements that present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth and complexity of the issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by the issuer’s financial statements.”

NYSE MKT Section 803(B)(2)(a)(iii)

Each issuer must have an Audit Committee of at least three members, each of whom:

“is able to read and understand fundamental financial statements, including a company’s balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement. Additionally, each issuer must certify that it has, and will continue to have, at least one member of the audit committee who is financially sophisticated, in that he or she has past employment experience in finance or accounting, requisite professional certification in accounting, or any other comparable experience or background which results in the individual’s financial sophistication, including but not limited to being or having been a chief executive officer, chief financial officer, other senior officer with financial oversight responsibilities. A director who qualifies as an audit committee financial expert under Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K …. is presumed to qualify as financially sophisticated.”

ITEM 407(d)(5)(ii) OF REGULATION S-K, DEFINITION OF FINANCIAL EXPERT

For purposes of this Item, an audit committee financial expert means a person who has the following attributes:

(A)

An understanding of generally accepted accounting principles and financial statements;

   
(B)

The ability to assess the general application of such principles in connection with the accounting for estimates, accruals and reserves;

   
(C)

Experience preparing, auditing, analyzing or evaluating financial statements that present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth and complexity of issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by the registrant’s financial statements, or experience actively supervising one or more persons engaged in such activities;

   
(D)

An understanding of internal control over financial reporting; and

   
(E)

An understanding of audit committee functions.



- 9 -

A person shall have acquired such attributes through:

(A)

Education and experience as a principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller, public accountant or auditor or experience in one or more positions that involve the performance of similar functions;

   
(B)

Experience actively supervising a principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller, public accountant, auditor or person performing similar functions;

   
(C)

Experience overseeing or assessing the performance of companies or public accountants with respect to the preparation, auditing or evaluation of financial statements; or

   
(D)

Other relevant experience.




 

 


Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2016 and 2015

 

 



MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The consolidated financial statements, the notes thereto and other financial information contained in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board and are the responsibility of the management of Taseko Mines Limited. The financial information presented elsewhere in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis is consistent with the data that is contained in the consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements, where necessary, include amounts which are based on the best estimates and judgment of management.

In order to discharge management’s responsibility for the integrity of the financial statements, the Company maintains a system of internal accounting controls. These controls are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the Company’s assets are safeguarded, transactions are executed and recorded in accordance with management’s authorization, proper records are maintained and relevant and reliable financial information is produced. These controls include maintaining quality standards in hiring and training of employees, establishing policies and procedures, a corporate code of conduct and ensuring that there is proper accountability for performance within appropriate and well-defined areas of responsibility.

The Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing management’s performance of its responsibilities for financial reporting and internal control. The Audit Committee, which is composed of non-executive directors, meets with management as well as the external auditors to ensure that management is properly fulfilling its financial reporting responsibilities to the Directors who approve the consolidated financial statements. The external auditors have full and unrestricted access to the Audit Committee to discuss the scope of their audits, the adequacy of the system of internal controls and review financial reporting issues.

The consolidated financial statements have been audited by KPMG LLP, the Company’s independent registered chartered accountants, in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards.

 

/s/ Russell Hallbauer /s/ Stuart McDonald
   
   
Russell Hallbauer Stuart McDonald
Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
   
   
Vancouver, British Columbia  
February 21, 2017  


MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

The Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and Rule 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the Company’s Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

The Company’s management, under the supervision of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and Rule 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act as of December 31, 2016. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth in the Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this assessment, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2016, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.

The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016 has been audited by KPMG LLP, the Company’s independent registered chartered accountants, as stated in their report immediately preceding the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

 

/s/ Russell Hallbauer /s/ Stuart McDonald
   
   
Russell Hallbauer Stuart McDonald
Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
   
   
Vancouver, British Columbia  
February 21, 2017  



     
  KPMG LLP Telephone  (604) 691-3000
  Chartered Professional Accountants Fax (604) 691-3031
  PO Box 10426 777 Dunsmuir Street Internet www.kpmg.ca
  Vancouver BC V7Y 1K3    
  Canada    

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders of Taseko Mines Limited

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Taseko Mines Limited as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive loss, cash flows and changes in equity for the years then ended.These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of Taseko Mines Limited’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Taseko Mines Limited as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, and its consolidated financial performance and its consolidated cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Taseko Mines Limited’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February 21, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of Taseko Mines Limited’s internal control over financial reporting.

//s// KPMG LLP

Chartered Professional Accountants

February 21, 2017
Vancouver, Canada

KPMG LLP is a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG
network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative
(“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity.
KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP.



     
  KPMG LLP Telephone  (604) 691-3000
  Chartered Professional Accountants Fax (604) 691-3031
  PO Box 10426 777 Dunsmuir Street Internet www.kpmg.ca
  Vancouver BC V7Y 1K3    
  Canada    

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders of Taseko Mines Limited:

We have audited Taseko Mines Limited’s (“the Company”)’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)”. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Taseko Mines Limited maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)”.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Taseko Mines Limited as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive loss, changes in equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, and our report dated February 21, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

//s// KPMG LLP

Chartered Professional Accountants

February 21, 2017
Vancouver, Canada

KPMG LLP is a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG
network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative
(“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity.
KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP.


TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss
(Cdn$ in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

          For the years ended  
                December 31,  
    Note     2016     2015  
                   
Revenues   4     263,865     289,298  
Cost of sales   5              
 Production costs         (209,150 )   (238,464 )
 Depletion and amortization         (52,939 )   (49,514 )
Earnings from mining operations         1,776     1,320  
                   
General and administrative         (11,299 )   (13,892 )
Share-based compensation   21     (3,619 )   (1,885 )
Exploration and evaluation         (2,087 )   (928 )
Gain (loss) on derivatives   7     (6,360 )   13,268  
Other income (expenses)   8     (4,072 )   1,437  
Loss before financing costs and income taxes         (25,661 )   (680 )
                   
Finance expenses   9     (30,007 )   (25,923 )
Finance income         1,084     1,371  
Foreign exchange gain (loss)         8,475     (42,725 )
Loss before income taxes         (46,109 )   (67,957 )
                   
Income tax recovery   10     14,713     5,605  
Net loss for the year         (31,396 )   (62,352 )
                   
                   
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax                  
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale financial assets         484     (1,964 )
Foreign currency translation reserve         (3,709 )   10,713  
Total other comprehensive income (loss) for the year         (3,225 )   8,749  
                   
Total comprehensive loss for the year         (34,621 )   (53,603 )
                   
                   
Loss per share                  
   Basic         (0.14 )   (0.28 )
   Diluted         (0.14 )   (0.28 )
                   
Weighted average shares outstanding (thousands)                  
   Basic         221,828     221,809  
   Diluted         221,828     221,809  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Cdn$ in thousands)

          For the years ended  
                December 31,  
    Note     2016     2015  
                   
Operating activities                  
Net loss for the year         (31,396 )   (62,352 )
   Adjustments for:                  
       Depletion and amortization         53,024     49,599  
       Income tax expense (recovery)   10     (14,713 )   (5,605 )
       Share-based compensation expense   21     3,682     2,002  
       (Gain) loss on derivatives   7     6,360     (13,268 )
       Finance expenses         28,923     24,552  
       Unrealized foreign exchange loss (gain)         (7,785 )   43,809  
       Write-down of marketable securities         -     419  
       Deferred electricity payments   18     10,938     -  
       Other operating activities         (469 )   (142 )
   Net change in non-cash working capital   23     (14,711 )   12,681  
Cash provided by operating activities         33,853     51,695  
                   
Investing activities                  
   Purchase of property, plant and equipment   14     (18,843 )   (18,960 )
   Purchase of copper put options   7     (3,777 )   (5,278 )
   Proceeds from the sale/settlement of copper put options   7     3,371     21,374  
   Other investing activities         158     99  
Cash used for investing activities         (19,091 )   (2,765 )
                   
Financing activities                  
   Proceeds from senior secured credit facility   17e     93,605     -  
   Financing costs   17e     (4,346 )   -  
   Repayment of Curis secured loan   17d     (43,767 )   -  
   Repayment of capital leases and equipment loans         (16,586 )   (13,636 )
   Proceeds from equipment loan         -     5,625  
   Interest paid         (22,668 )   (22,631 )
   Common shares issued on exercise of stock options         22     -  
Cash provided by (used for) financing activities         6,260     (30,642 )
                   
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents         (513 )   4,434  
Increase in cash and equivalents         20,509     22,722  
Cash and equivalents, beginning of year   2.4     68,521     45,799  
Cash and equivalents, end of year         89,030     68,521  
                   
Supplementary cash flow information.   23              

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Cdn$ in thousands)

        December 31,     December 31,  
    Note   2016     2015  
                 
ASSETS                
Current assets                
 Cash and equivalents   2.4   89,030     68,521  
 Accounts receivable   11   12,905     13,199  
 Other financial assets   12   1,574     1,602  
 Inventories   13   60,550     40,621  
 Prepaids       1,268     1,617  
        165,327     125,560  
                 
Other financial assets   12   48,368     48,185  
Property, plant and equipment   14   730,208     794,758  
Goodwill   15   5,536     5,706  
        949,439     974,209  
                 
LIABILITIES                
Current liabilities                
 Accounts payable and other liabilities   16   33,416     30,143  
 Current income tax payable   10   889     1,038  
 Current portion of long-term debt   17   16,157     59,801  
 Interest payable on senior notes       4,336     4,469  
        54,798     95,451  
                 
Long-term debt   17   373,133     305,401  
Provision for environmental rehabilitation ("PER")   19   98,454     124,445  
Deferred and other tax liabilities   10   62,202     78,128  
Other financial liabilities   18   21,913     444  
        610,500     603,869  
                 
EQUITY                
Share capital   20 (a)   417,975     417,944  
Contributed surplus   20 (b),21   45,747     42,558  
Accumulated other comprehensive income ("AOCI")   20c   12,357     15,582  
Deficit       (137,140 )   (105,744 )
        338,939     370,340  
        949,439     974,209  
                 
Commitments and contingencies   19, 22            
Subsequent event   26            

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
(Cdn$ in thousands)

    Share     Contributed                    
    capital     surplus     AOCI     Deficit     Total  
                               
Balance at January 1, 2015   417,944     40,890     6,833     (43,392 )   422,275  
Share-based compensation expense   -     1,668     -     -     1,668  
Total comprehensive income (loss) for the year   -     -     8,749     (62,352 )   (53,603 )
Balance at December 31, 2015   417,944     42,558     15,582     (105,744 )   370,340  
                               
Balance at January 1, 2016   417,944     42,558     15,582     (105,744 )   370,340  
Issuance of warrants   -     830     -     -     830  
Exercise of options   31     (9 )   -     -     22  
Share-based compensation expense   -     2,368     -     -     2,368  
Total comprehensive loss for the year   -     -     (3,225 )   (31,396 )   (34,621 )
Balance at December 31, 2016   417,975     45,747     12,357     (137,140 )   338,939  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Cdn$ in thousands)

1.    REPORTING ENTITY

Taseko Mines Limited (the “Company” or “Taseko”) is a corporation governed by the British Columbia Business Corporations Act. The consolidated financial statements of the Company as at and for the year ended December 31, 2016 comprise the Company, its subsidiaries and its 75% interest in the Gibraltar joint venture since its formation on March 31, 2010. The Company is principally engaged in the production and sale of metals, as well as related activities including exploration and mine development, within the province of British Columbia, Canada and the State of Arizona, USA. Seasonality does not have a significant impact on the Company’s operations.

2.    BASIS OF PREPARATION

2.1        Statement of compliance

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

These consolidated financial statements were authorized for issue by the Board of Directors on February 21, 2017.

2.2        Basis of measurement, judgment and estimation

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a historical cost basis except for fair-value- through-profit-or-loss, available-for-sale and derivative financial instruments, which are measured at fair value.

These consolidated financial statements are presented in Canadian dollars, which is the Company’s functional currency. Foreign currency monetary assets and liabilities are translated into Canadian dollars at the closing exchange rate as at the balance sheet date. Foreign currency non-monetary assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses are translated into Canadian dollars at the prevailing rate of exchange on the dates of the transactions. Any gains and losses are included in profit and loss. The Company’s US subsidiary measures the items in its financial statements using the US dollar as its functional currency. The assets and liabilities of the US subsidiary are translated into Canadian dollars using the period end exchange rate. The income and expenses are translated into Canadian dollars at the weighted average exchange rates to the period end reporting date. Any gains and losses on translation are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”). All financial information presented in Canadian dollars has been rounded to the nearest thousand, unless otherwise noted.

The preparation of these consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates. Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimates are revised and in any future periods affected.

In the process of applying the Company’s accounting policies, significant areas where judgment is required include the determination of a joint arrangement and recovery of other deferred tax assets.

Significant areas of estimation include reserve and resource estimation; asset valuations and the measurement of impairment charges or reversals; finished and in-process inventory quantities; plant and equipment lives; tax provisions; provisions for environmental rehabilitation; valuation of financial instruments and derivatives; deferred stripping costs and share-based compensation. Key estimates and assumptions made by management with respect to these areas have been disclosed in the notes to these consolidated financial statements as appropriate.

1



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Cdn$ in thousands)

The accuracy of reserve and resource estimates is a function of the quantity and quality of available data and the assumptions made and judgment used in the engineering and geological interpretation, and may be subject to revision based on various factors. Changes in reserve and resource estimates may impact the carrying value of property, plant and equipment; the calculation of depreciation expense; the capitalization of stripping costs incurred during production; and the timing of cash flows related to the provision for environmental rehabilitation.

Changes in forecast prices of commodities, exchange rates, production costs and recovery rates may change the economic status of reserves and resources. Forecast prices of commodities, exchange rates, production costs and recovery rates, and discount rates assumptions, either individually or collectively, may impact the carrying value of derivative financial instruments, inventories, property, plant and equipment, and intangibles, as well as the measurement of impairment charges or reversals.

2.3        Basis of consolidation

The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of the Company and controlled entities as at December 31, 2016. Control is achieved when the Company is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the investee.

The Company reassesses whether or not it controls an investee if facts and circumstances indicate that there are changes to one or more of the three elements of control. Consolidation of a subsidiary begins when the Company obtains control over the subsidiary and ceases when the Company loses control of the subsidiary. Assets, liabilities, income and expenses of a subsidiary acquired or disposed of during the year are included in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income (loss) from the date the Company gains control until the date the Company ceases to control the subsidiary. When necessary, adjustments are made to the financial statements of subsidiaries to bring their accounting policies into line with the Company’s accounting policies. All intercompany assets and liabilities, equity, income, expenses and cash flows relating to transactions between members of the Company are eliminated in full on consolidation.

The Company applies the acquisition method in accounting for business combinations. The consideration transferred by the Company to obtain control of a subsidiary is calculated as the sum of the acquisition-date fair values of assets transferred, liabilities incurred and the equity interests issued by the Company, which includes the fair value of any asset or liability arising from a contingent consideration arrangement. Acquisition costs are expensed as incurred.

The Company recognizes identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination regardless of whether they have been previously recognized in the acquiree’s financial statements prior to the acquisition. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed are generally measured at their acquisition-date fair values.

Goodwill is stated after separate recognition of identifiable intangible assets. It is calculated as the excess of the sum of a) fair value of consideration transferred, b) the recognized amount of any non-controlling interest in the acquiree and c) acquisition-date fair value of any existing equity interest in the acquiree, over the acquisition-date fair values of identifiable net assets. If the fair values of identifiable net assets exceed the sum calculated above, the excess amount would be recognized in profit or loss immediately.

2.4        Changes in accounting policies and disclosures

Except for the changes below, the Company has consistently applied the accounting policies set out in note 2.5 to all periods presented in these consolidated financial statements.

As at December 31, 2016, the Company reclassified certain cash amounts from current to non-current classification to reflect the restricted nature of the cash. The December 31, 2015, amounts have also been reclassified from current to non-current for comparative purposes (Note 12).

2



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Cdn$ in thousands)

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company changed its accounting policy in respect of allocating reductions in its tax pools for British Columbia Mineral Tax purposes. This change has been applied retrospectively and has resulted in the previously presented Other assets of $15,985 now being presented as a reduction to Deferred income taxes as at December 31, 2015. Management believes the new method provides reliable information and provides for a more relevant representation of the financial condition of the Company which reflects the way the tax pools will be realized.

2.5        Significant Accounting Policies

(a)        Revenue recognition

Revenue is recognized when the significant risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred and the amount of revenue is reasonably determinable. These conditions are generally satisfied when title passes to the customer. Cash received in advance of meeting these conditions is recorded as deferred revenue.

Under the terms of the Company’s concentrate and cathode sales contracts, the final sales amount is based on final assay results and quoted market prices which may be in a period subsequent to the date of sale. Revenues for these sales, net of treatment and refining charges are recorded at the time of shipment, which is also when the risks and rewards of ownership transfer to the customer, based on an estimate of metal contained using initial assay results and forward market prices on the expected date that final sales prices will be fixed. The period between provisional pricing and final settlement can be up to four months. This provisional pricing mechanism represents an embedded derivative. The embedded derivative is recorded at fair value each reporting period by reference to forward market prices until the date of final pricing, with the changes in fair value recorded as an adjustment to revenue.

(b)        Cash and equivalents

Cash and equivalents consist of cash and highly-liquid investments having terms of three months or less from the date of acquisition and that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash. Cash and equivalents exclude cash subject to restrictions.

(c)        Financial instruments

Financial assets and liabilities are recognized on the balance sheet when the Company becomes party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. The classification of financial instruments dictates how these assets and liabilities are measured subsequently in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL)

Financial instruments are classified as FVTPL when they are held for trading. A financial instrument is held for trading if it was acquired for the purpose of selling in the near term. Derivative financial instruments that are not designated and effective as hedging instruments are classified as FVTPL. Financial instruments classified as FVTPL are stated at fair value with any changes in fair value recognized in earnings for the period. Financial assets in this category include derivative financial instruments that the Company acquires to manage exposure to commodity price fluctuations and to improve the returns on its cash assets. These instruments are non-hedge derivative instruments.

Loans and receivables

Loans and receivables are financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. Subsequent to initial recognition, these financial assets are recorded at amortized cost using the effective interest method, except for short-term receivables when the recognition of interest would be immaterial. Accounts receivable are assessed for evidence of impairment at each reporting date, with any impairment recognized in earnings for the period. Financial assets in this category include cash and equivalents and accounts receivable.

3



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Cdn$ in thousands)

Available-for-sale financial assets

Marketable securities, subscription receipts and reclamation deposits are designated as available-for-sale and recorded at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses are recognized in other comprehensive income until the securities are disposed of or when there is evidence of impairment in value. Impairment is evident when there has been a significant or sustained decline in the fair value of the marketable securities. If an impairment in value has been determined, it is recognized in earnings for the period.

Financial liabilities

Financial liabilities are initially recorded at fair value, net of transaction costs, and are subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. The Company has accounted for accounts payable and accrued liabilities and long-term debt under this method.

Fair value measurement

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy establishes three levels to classify the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value, by reference to the reliability of the inputs used to estimate the fair values.

Level 1 – quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2 – inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e., as prices) or indirectly (i.e., derived from prices); and

Level 3 – inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).

(d)        Exploration and evaluation

Exploration and evaluation expenditures relate to the initial search for a mineral deposit and the subsequent evaluation to determine the economic potential of the mineral deposit. The exploration and evaluation stage commences when the Company obtains the legal right or license to begin exploration. Exploration and evaluation expenditures are recognized in earnings in the period in which they are incurred.

Capitalization of development costs as mineral property, plant and equipment commences once the technical feasibility and commercial viability of the extraction of mineral reserve and resources associated with the Company’s evaluation properties are established and management has made a decision to proceed with development.

(e)        Inventories

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost is determined on a weighted average basis and includes direct labour and materials; non-capitalized stripping costs; depreciation and amortization; freight; and overhead costs. Net realizable value is determined with reference to relevant market prices, less applicable variable selling costs and estimated remaining costs of completion to bring the inventories into saleable form.

Ore stockpiles represent stockpiled ore and metals in the processing circuits that have not yet completed the production process, and are not yet in a saleable form. Finished goods inventories represent metals in saleable form that have not yet been sold. Materials and supplies inventories represent consumables used in the production process, as well as spare parts and other maintenance supplies that are not classified as capital items.

4



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Cdn$ in thousands)

The quantity of recoverable metal in stockpiled ore and in the processing circuits is an estimate which is based on the tons of ore added and removed, expected grade and recovery. The quantity of recoverable metal in concentrate is an estimate using initial assay results.

(f)        Property, plant and equipment

Land, buildings, plant and equipment

Land, buildings, plant and equipment are recorded at cost, including all expenditures incurred to prepare an asset for its intended use.

Repairs and maintenance costs are charged to expense as incurred, except when these repairs significantly extend the life of an asset or result in an operating improvement. In these instances, the portion of these repairs relating to the betterment is capitalized as part of plant and equipment.

Depreciation is based on the cost of the asset less residual value. Where an item of plant and equipment is comprised of major components with different useful lives, the components are accounted for as separate items and depreciated separately. Depreciation commences when an asset is available for use. Estimates of remaining useful lives and residual values are reviewed annually. Changes in estimates are accounted for prospectively.

The depreciation rates of the major asset categories are as follows:

Land Not depreciated
Buildings Straight-line basis over 10-25 years
Plant and equipment Units-of-production basis
Mining equipment Straight-line basis over 5-20 years
Light vehicles and other mobile equipment Straight-line basis over 2-5 years
Furniture, computer and office equipment Straight-line basis over 2-3 years

Mineral properties

Mineral properties consist of the cost of acquiring and developing mineral properties. Once in production, mineral properties are amortized on a units-of-production basis over the component of the ore body to which they relate.

Property acquisition costs arise either as an individual asset purchase or as part of a business combination, and may represent a combination of either proven and probable reserves, resources, or future exploration potential. When management has not made a determination that technical feasibility and commercial viability of extracting a mineral resource are demonstrable, the entire amount is considered property acquisition costs and not amortized. When such property moves into development, the property acquisition cost asset is transferred to mineral properties within property, plant and equipment.

Mineral property development costs include: stripping costs incurred in order to provide initial access to the ore body; stripping costs incurred during production that generate a future economic benefit by increasing the productive capacity, extending the productive life of the mine or allowing access to a mineable reserve; capitalized project development costs; and capitalized interest.

Construction in progress

Construction in progress includes the purchase price and any costs directly attributable to bringing the asset to the location and condition necessary for its intended use. Construction in progress includes advances on long-lead items. Construction in progress is not depreciated. Once the asset is complete and available for use, the costs of construction are transferred to the appropriate category of property, plant and equipment, and depreciation commences.

5



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Cdn$ in thousands)

Capitalized interest

Interest is capitalized for qualifying assets. Qualifying assets are assets that require a substantial period of time to prepare for their intended use. Capitalization ceases when the asset is substantially complete or if construction is interrupted for an extended period. Where the funds used to finance a project form part of general borrowings, the amount capitalized is calculated using a weighted average of rates applicable to relevant general borrowings of the Company during the period.

Leased assets

Leased assets in which the Company receives substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the asset are capitalized as finance leases at the lower of the fair value of the asset or the estimated present value of the minimum lease payments. The corresponding lease obligation is recorded within debt on the balance sheet. Assets under operating leases are not capitalized and rental payments are expensed on a straight line basis.

Impairment

The carrying amounts of the Company’s non-financial assets are reviewed for impairment whenever circumstances suggest that the carrying value may not be recoverable. If such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment, if any. These assessments require the use of estimates and assumptions such as long-term commodity prices, discount rates, future capital requirements, exploration potential and operating performance.

The recoverable amount of an asset or cash generating unit (CGU) is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. Fair value is determined as the amount that would be obtained from the sale of the asset in an arm’s-length transaction between knowledgeable and willing parties. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre–tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. For the purpose of impairment testing, assets that cannot be tested individually are grouped together into the smallest group of assets that generates cash inflows that are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets or CGU’s. If the recoverable amount of an asset or its related CGU is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of the asset or CGU is reduced to its recoverable amount and the impairment loss is recognized in earnings for the period.

Where an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset or CGU is increased to the revised estimate of its recoverable amount, but not to an amount that exceeds the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognized for the asset or CGU in prior years. A reversal of an impairment loss is recognized immediately in earnings.

(g)        Income taxes

Income tax on the earnings for the periods presented comprises current and deferred tax. Income tax is recognized in earnings except to the extent that it relates to items recognized directly in equity or in other comprehensive income. Income tax is calculated using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date applicable to the period of expected realization or settlement.

Current tax expense is the expected tax payable on the taxable income for the year, adjusted for amendments to tax payable with regards to previous years.

Deferred tax is determined using the balance sheet liability method, providing for temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes. The following temporary differences are not provided for: the initial recognition of assets or liabilities acquired (not in a business combination) that affect neither accounting nor taxable profit on acquisition; and differences relating to investments in subsidiaries, associates, and joint ventures to the extent that they are not probable to reverse in the foreseeable future. The amount of deferred tax provided is based on the expected manner of realization or settlement of the carrying amount of assets and liabilities. A deferred tax asset is recognized only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which the asset can be utilized. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realized.

6



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Cdn$ in thousands)

(h)        Share-based compensation

The fair-value method is used for the Company’s share-based payment transactions. The cost of the share option units and other equity-settled share-based payments are recorded based on the estimated fair value at the grant date, including an estimate for the forfeiture rate, using the Black-Scholes option pricing valuation model. The expense is recognized in earnings on a graded amortization basis over the option vesting period, with a corresponding increase in equity.

Share-based compensation expense relating to cash-settled awards, including the deferred and performance share units, is accrued over the vesting period of the units, based on the quoted market value of the Company’s common shares on the date of grant. The performance units have an additional vesting factor determined by comparing the Company’s total shareholder return to those achieved by a peer group of companies. For the deferred share units, the expense and liability are re-measured to fair value each reporting period to reflect changes in the market value of the Company’s common shares. The compensation expense recognized for the performance units is recognized over the vesting period and adjusted based on the results of the peer group percentile performance and the quoted market value of the Company’s common shares at the end of the performance period.

(i)        Provisions

Environmental rehabilitation

The Company records the present value of estimated costs of legal and constructive obligations required to retire an asset in the period in which the obligation occurs. Environmental rehabilitation activities include facility decommissioning and dismantling; removal and treatment of waste materials; site and land rehabilitation, including compliance with and monitoring of environmental regulations; and related costs required to perform this work and/or operate equipment designed to reduce or eliminate environmental effects. The provision for environmental rehabilitation (“PER”) is adjusted each period for new disturbances, and changes in regulatory requirements, the estimated amount of future cash flows required to discharge the liability, the timing of such cash flows and the pre-tax discount rate specific to the liability. The unwinding of the discount is recognized in earnings as a finance cost.

When a PER is initially recognized, the corresponding cost is capitalized by increasing the carrying amount of the related asset, and is amortized to earnings on a unit-of-production basis. Costs are only capitalized to the extent that the amount meets the definition of an asset and represents future economic benefits to the operation.

Significant estimates and assumptions are made in determining the provision for environmental rehabilitation as there are numerous factors that will affect the ultimate liability payable. These factors include estimation of the extent and cost of rehabilitation activities; timing of future cash flows that are impacted by changes in discount rates; inflation rate; and regulatory requirements.

Other provisions

Other provisions are recognized when the Company has a present obligation (legal or constructive) that has arisen as a result of a past event and it is probable that a future outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation, provided that a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. Where the effect is material, the provision is discounted using a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risk specific to the obligation. The accretion expense is included in finance expense.

7



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Cdn$ in thousands)

(j)        Finance income and expenses

Finance income comprises interest income on funds invested, gains on the disposal of marketable securities, and changes in the fair value of derivatives included in cash and equivalents and marketable securities. Interest income is recognized as it accrues in earnings, using the effective interest method. Finance expenses comprise interest expense on borrowings, unwinding of the discount on provisions, losses on the disposal of marketable securities, changes in the fair value of derivatives included in cash and equivalents and marketable securities, and impairment losses recognized on financial assets. Borrowing costs that are not directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset are recognized in earnings using the effective interest method.

(k)        Earnings (loss) per share

The Company presents basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share data for its common shares, calculated by dividing the earnings (loss) attributable to common shareholders of the Company by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is determined by adjusting the earnings attributable to common shareholders and the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the effects of all dilutive potential common shares, which comprise convertible preferred shares and share options granted. There is no dilution impact when the Company incurs a loss.

(l)        Government assistance

Government assistance includes investment tax credits and is recognized when there is reasonable assurance that the Company will comply with the relevant conditions and that the government assistance will be received. Government assistance that meets the recognition criteria and that relates to current expenses is recorded as a reduction of the related expenses. Government assistance that meets the recognition criteria and that relates to the acquisition of an asset is recorded as a reduction of assets and is applied as a reduction of the cost of the related asset. Investment tax credits, until they are refunded or applied to reduce the Company's current tax liabilities, are included as "other asset" in the financial statements.

(m)        Interests in joint arrangements

IFRS defines a joint arrangement as one over which two or more parties have joint control, which is the contractually agreed sharing of control over an arrangement. This exists only when the decisions about the relevant activities (being those that significantly affect the returns of the arrangement) require the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control.

A joint operation is a type of joint arrangement whereby the parties that have joint control of the arrangement have rights to the assets and obligations for the liabilities, relating to the arrangement. In relation to its interests in joint operations, the Company recognizes its:

8



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Cdn$ in thousands)

2.6        New accounting standards

In May 2014, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 16, Property, Plant and Equipment and IAS 38, Intangibles. These amendments prohibit the use of revenue-based depreciation methods for property, plant and equipment and limit the use of revenue-based amortization for intangible assets. These amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2016, and are to be applied prospectively. These amendments did not have an impact the Company’s financial statements as revenue-based depreciation or amortization methods are not used.

The Company has not applied the following revised or new IFRS that have been issued but were not yet effective at December 31, 2016. These accounting standards are not expected to have a significant effect on the Company’s accounting policies or financial statements:

3.    INTEREST IN GIBRALTAR JOINT VENTURE

On March 31, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with Cariboo Copper Corp. (Cariboo) whereby the Company contributed certain assets and liabilities of the Gibraltar mine, operating in British Columbia, into an unincorporated joint venture to acquire a 75% interest in the joint venture. Cariboo contributed $186,800 to purchase the remaining 25% interest.

The assets and liabilities contributed by the Company to the joint venture were mineral property interests, plant and equipment, inventories, prepaid expenses, reclamation deposits, capital lease obligations, and site closure and reclamation obligations. Certain key strategic, operating, investing and financing policies of the joint venture require unanimous approval such that neither venturer is in a position to exercise unilateral control over the joint venture. The Company continues to be the operator of the Gibraltar mine.

The Company has joint control over the joint arrangement and as such consolidates its 75% portion of all the joint venture’s assets, liabilities, income and expenses.

9



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Cdn$ in thousands)

The following is a summary of the Gibraltar joint venture financial information on a 100% basis.

    As at December 31,  
    2016     2015  
Cash and equivalents   79,638     7,586  
Other current assets   98,233     69,536  
Current assets   177,871     77,122  
Non-current assets   1,106,866     1,213,708  
             
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities   38,747     34,506  
Other current financial liabilities   23,743     23,309  
Current liabilities   62,490     57,815  
Long-term debt   20,287     42,032  
Provision for environmental rehabilitation   129,487     164,087  
Other financial liability   14,584     -  
Non-current liabilities   164,358     206,119  

    Years ended December 31,  
    2016     2015  
Revenues   351,820     385,731  
Production costs   (278,440 )   (318,008 )
Depletion and amortization   (81,715 )   (76,172 )
Other operating expense   (3,725 )   (4,022 )
Interest expense   (6,459 )   (7,132 )
Interest income   1,158     1,330  
Foreign exchange loss   22     (663 )
Net earnings (loss)   (17,339 )   (18,936 )
Other comprehensive income (loss)   (693 )   (5 )
Comprehensive income (loss) for joint arrangement   (18,032 )   (18,941 )

4.    REVENUE

    Years ended December 31,  
    2016     2015  
Copper contained in concentrate   283,401     311,890  
Copper cathode   -     2,211  
Molybdenum concentrate   5,900     5,036  
Silver contained in copper concentrate   3,988     3,795  
 Total gross revenue   293,289     322,932  
Less: Treatment and refining costs   (29,424 )   (33,634 )
Revenue   263,865     289,298  

10



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Cdn$ in thousands)

5.    COST OF SALES

    Years ended December 31,  
    2016     2015  
Site operating costs   209,381     225,306  
Transportation costs   16,507     17,129  
Changes in inventories of finished goods and ore stockpiles   (16,738 )   (3,971 )
Production costs   209,150     238,464  
Depletion and amortization   52,939     49,514  
Cost of sales   262,089     287,978  

Cost of sales consists of site operating costs (which include personnel costs, mine site supervisory costs, non-capitalized stripping costs, repair and maintenance costs, consumables, operating supplies and external services), transportation costs, and depletion and amortization.

6.    COMPENSATION EXPENSE

    Years ended December 31,  
    2016     2015  
Wages, salaries and benefits   57,987     62,874  
Post-employment benefits   1,309     1,400  
Share-based compensation   3,682     2,002  
    62,978     66,276  

Compensation expense is presented as a component of cost of sales, general and administrative expense, and exploration and evaluation expense.

7.    DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company purchased copper put option contracts for 65 million pounds of copper with maturity dates ranging from the second quarter of 2016 to the first quarter of 2017, at strike prices ranging between US$2.10 and US$2.20 per pound, at a total cost of $3,777. During the 2016 year, the Company received proceeds of $3,371 (2015: $21,374) from the sale or settlement of put options. Details of the options outstanding at December 31, 2016 are summarized in the following table:

  Notional amount Strike price Maturity Date Fair value asset
At December 31, 2016        
Commodity contracts .        
 Copper put option contracts 15 million lbs US$2.20/lb Q1 2017 155
 Copper put option contracts 5 million lbs US$2.10/lb January 2017 -

At December 31, 2015        
Commodity contracts        
 Copper put option contracts 15 million lbs US$2.05/lb Q1 2016 671

11



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Cdn$ in thousands)

The following table outlines the gains (losses) associated with derivative instruments:

    Years ended December 31,  
    2016     2015  
Realized gain (loss) on copper put options   (1,956 )   16,399  
Unrealized loss on copper put options   (1,044 )   (3,131 )
Change in fair value of copper call option liability (Note 17e)   (3,360 )   -  
    (6,360 )   13,268  

The realized loss of $1,956 (2015: realized gain $16,399) on copper put options is comprised of cash proceeds on the settlement and sale of these contracts, net of the purchase premiums related to the options.

8.    OTHER EXPENSES (INCOME)

    Years ended December 31,  
    2016     2015  
Special shareholder meeting costs   4,894     -  
Other financing costs   616     -  
Management fee income   (1,043 )   (1,076 )
Other operating income   (319 )   (768 )
Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment   (76 )   (12 )
Write-down of marketable securities   -     419  
    (4,072 )   (1,437 )

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company incurred total costs of $4,894 on legal and other advisory costs associated with a special shareholder meeting, a proxy contest and related litigation.

9.    FINANCE EXPENSES

    Years ended December 31,  
    2016     2015  
Interest expense   27,649     23,371  
Accretion on PER (Note 19)   2,358     2,552  
    30,007     25,923  

12



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Cdn$ in thousands)

10.    INCOME TAX

(a)        Income tax expense (recovery)

    Years ended December 31,  
    2016     2015  
Current income tax:            
 Current period   836     719  
Deferred income tax:            
 Origination and reversal of temporary differences   (15,307 )   (6,361 )
 Deferred tax adjustments related to prior periods   (242 )   37  
    (15,549 )   (6,324 )
Income tax expense (recovery)   (14,713 )   (5,605 )

(b)        Income tax recognized directly in other comprehensive income (loss)

    Years ended December 31,  
    2016     2015  
Unrealized (income) loss on available-for-sale financial assets, before tax   32     2,257  
Tax expense (recovery)   (516 )   (293 )
 Unrealized (income) loss on available-for-sale financial assets, net of tax   (484 )   1,964  
Foreign currency translation reserve   3,709     (10,713 )
Total other comprehensive (income) loss for the year   3,225     (8,749 )

(c)        Effective tax rate reconciliation

    Years ended December 31,  
    2016     2015  
Income tax at Canadian statutory rate of 35.62% (2015: 35.62%)   (16,424 )   (24,206 )
 Permanent differences   1,979     11,595  
 Tax rate differences   1,118     69  
 Foreign tax rate differential   (103 )   343  
 Unrecognized tax benefits   (1,072 )   6,557  
 Other   (211 )   37  
Income tax expense (recovery)   (14,713 )   (5,605 )

(d)        Deferred tax assets and liabilities

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are attributable to the following:

    As at December 31,  
    2016     2015  
Property, plant and equipment   (151,230 )   (156,491 )
Other financial assets   316     (1,624 )
Provisions   17,926     24,736  

13



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Cdn$ in thousands)

Tax loss carry forwards   71,051     55,251  
Deferred tax liability   (61,937 )   (78,128 )

Tax loss carry forwards relate to non-capital losses in Canada of pre-tax $194,929 (2015: $138,112) which expire between 2027 and 2036 and net operating losses in the United States of pre-tax $56,273 (2015: $53,492), which expire between 2027 and 2036. Included in the 2016 deferred and other tax liabilities balance is a long-term tax liability of $265.

e)        Unrecognized deferred tax assets and liabilities

    As at December 31,  
    2016     2015  
Deductible temporary differences:            
   Debt   76,031     84,291  
   Other investments   34,840     34,834  
   Other financial assets   11,620     11,589  
Deferred tax asset:            
   Debt   9,880     10,958  
   Other investments   4,529     4,528  
   Other financial assets   1,900     1,894  

Deferred tax assets have not been recognized in respect of these items because it is not probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the Company can utilize the benefits. There are no unrecognized tax liabilities.

Included in the deferred tax balance are other assets of $15,985 (2015: $15,985) which represents additional mineral tax deductions that the Company has received under the British Columbia New Mine Allowance program. The additional tax benefits arose as a result of the completion of the Gibraltar mine expansion and are only accessible by the Company once certain British Columbia mineral tax pools have been reduced, through a reduction in British Columbia mineral taxes payable (Note 2.4) .

11.    ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

    As at December 31,  
    2016     2015  
Trade receivables   9,463     9,727  
Other receivables due from joint venture partner   162     186  
Goods and services tax receivable   988     870  
Copper put option receivable   -     2,077  
Other receivables   2,292     339  
    12,905     13,199  

14



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Cdn$ in thousands)

12.    OTHER FINANCIAL ASSETS

    As at December 31,  
    2016     2015  
Current:            
 Marketable securities   1,419     931  
 Copper put option contracts (Note 7)   155     671  
    1,574     1,602  
Long-term:            
 Subscription receipts   10,333     10,333  
 Reclamation deposits (Note 19)   30,535     30,352  
 Cash   7,500     7,500  
    48,368     48,185  

The Company holds strategic investments in publicly traded and privately owned companies, which are classified as available for sale investments. As at December 31, 2016 these investments included marketable securities as well as subscription receipts. The subscription receipts relate to an investment in a privately held company with a director in common, and will be convertible into units comprised of shares, or shares and warrants (Note 25c).

The fair value of the marketable securities is based upon public market information and the Company reviews the value of its investments for evidence of impairment based on both quantitative and qualitative criteria. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, unrealized gains and losses from the mark-to-market of marketable securities and reclamation deposits have been recorded in other comprehensive income (loss). For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded a write-down through the statement of comprehensive income (loss) of $419 for the impairment of an investment in marketable securities. These assets are classified as available-for-sale financial assets.

The cash relates to security for an irrevocable standby letter of credit that has been provided to the Ministry of Finance as security for reclamation obligations at the Gibraltar Mine.

13.    INVENTORIES

    As at December 31,  
    2016     2015  
Ore stockpiles   28,186     7,678  
Copper contained in concentrate   5,741     6,030  
Molybdenum concentrate   106     -  
Materials and supplies   26,517     26,913  
    60,550     40,621  

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded net write-downs of $17,202 (2015: $6,648), to adjust the carryng value of ore stockpiles to net realizable value. These adjustments were included in cost of sales as a change in inventory of ore stockpile.

15



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Cdn$ in thousands)

14.    PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT

    Property                          
    Acquisition     Mineral     Plant and     Construction        
    costs     properties     equipment     in Progress     Total  
Cost                              
At January 1, 2015   85,930     209,924     649,888     4,293     950,035  
 Additions   -     18,083     -     2,064     20,147  
 Rehabilitation cost asset   -     11,678     -     -     11,678  
 Capitalized interest 1   -     4,079     -     -     4,079  
 Disposals   -     -     (922 )   -     (922 )
Foreign exchange translation   15,296     525     864     -     16,685  
Transfers between categories   -     -     5,610     (5,610 )   -  
At December 31, 2015   101,226     244,289     655,440     747     1,001,702  
 Additions   -     17,404     -     2,394     19,798  
 Rehabilitation cost asset   -     (27,870 )   -     -     (27,870 )
 Capitalized interest 1   -     5,219     -     -     5,219  
 Disposals   -     -     (838 )   -     (838 )
 Foreign exchange translation   (2,822 )   (214 )   (150 )   -     (3,186 )
 Transfers between categories   -     -     1,683     (1,683 )   -  
At December 31, 2016   98,404     238,828     656,135     1,458     994,825  
Accumulated depreciation                              
At January 1, 2015   -     46,933     109,443     -     156,376  
 Depreciation 2   -     20,648     29,989     -     50,637  
 Disposals   -     -     (69 )   -     (69 )
At December 31, 2015   -     67,581     139,363     -     206,944  
 Depreciation 2   -     29,076     28,743     -     57,819  
 Disposals   -     -     (146 )   -     (146 )
At December 31, 2016   -     96,657     167,960     -     264,617  
Carrying amounts                              
At December 31, 2015   101,226     176,708     516,077     747     794,758  
At December 31, 2016   98,404     142,171     488,175     1,458     730,208  

1

Interest was capitalized at an annual rate of 11% (2015: 11%).

2

Depreciation included in cost of sales for 2016 and 2015 of $52,939 and $49,514 respectively. Depreciation included in general and administrative costs for 2016 and 2015 of $85 for both years.

16



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Cdn$ in thousands)

(a)        Capital expenditures

During 2016, the Company capitalized stripping costs of $10,065 (2015: $11,863) and incurred other capital expenditures for Gibraltar of $3,932 (2015: $2,311). In addition, the Company capitalized development costs of $4,961 (2015: $5,081) for the Florence Copper Project along with $840 (2015: $866) for the Aley Niobium Project. During 2016, the Company capitalized interest costs of $5,219 (2015: $4,079), related to the Florence Copper Project.

(b)        Leased assets

The Company leases mining equipment under a number of capital lease agreements. Most of these leases provide the Company with the option to purchase the equipment at a beneficial price. Certain rents are based on an annual average usage for the applicable equipment and, if at the end of the term (unless the equipment has been purchased by the Company), the actual annual average usage of such equipment has been greater than the specified usage, the Company must pay an additional amount for each excess hour of actual usage. The leased assets secure the lease obligations (Note 17). At December 31, 2016, the net carrying amount of leased assets was $53,476 (2015: $58,610).

(c)        Property acquisition costs

Property acquisition costs are comprised of the Aley Niobium property $5,436, Florence Copper Project $95,788, New Prosperity gold-copper property $1 and Harmony gold property $1. The carrying amounts for the New Prosperity and Harmony properties are the original property acquisition costs less historical impairments.

15.    GOODWILL

Goodwill was recorded on the Company’s acquisition of Curis Resources Ltd. (“Curis”) in 2014. Curis is a mineral exploration and development company whose principal asset is the Florence Copper Project, an in-situ copper recovery and solvent extraction/electrowinning project located in central Arizona, USA. As at December 31, 2016, the carrying value of the goodwill decreased to $5,536 as a result of foreign currency translation.

16.    ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES

    As at December 31,  
    2016     2015  
Trade payables   28,180     26,293  
Other accrued liabilities   4,012     3,799  
Advance payments   1,163     -  
Payables to related parties   61     51  
    33,416     30,143  

17



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Cdn$ in thousands)

17.    DEBT

    As at December 31,  
    2016     2015  
Current:            
 Capital leases (b)   8,059     7,648  
 Secured equipment loans (c)   8,098     9,276  
 Curis secured loan (d)   -     42,877  
    16,157     59,801  
Long-term:            
 Senior notes (a)   266,435     273,876  
 Capital leases (b)   11,917     19,941  
 Secured equipment loans (c)   3,298     11,584  
 Senior secured credit facility (e)   91,483     -  
    373,133     305,401  

(a)        Senior notes

In April 2011, the Company completed a public offering of US$200,000 in senior unsecured notes. The notes mature on April 15, 2019 and bear interest at a fixed annual rate of 7.75%, payable semi-annually. The notes are unsecured obligations guaranteed by the Company’s subsidiaries and the subsidiary guarantees are, in turn, guaranteed by the Company. After April 15, 2015 the notes are redeemable by the Company at a price equal to 103.875%, and the redemption price declines to 100% after April 2017. The notes are also repayable upon a change of control at a price of 101%.

The foreign exchange translation of the US dollar denominated senior notes resulted in an unrealized foreign exchange gain of $8,260 in 2016 (2015: unrealized loss of $44,780) due to the strengthening (2015 – weakening) of the Canadian dollar.

There are no maintenance covenants with respect to the Company's financial performance. However, the Company is subject to certain restrictions on asset sales, incurrence of additional indebtedness, issuance of preferred stock, dividends and other restricted payments.

As at December 31, 2016, the Company is in compliance with all senior notes covenants.

(b)        Capital leases

Capital leases are repayable in monthly installments and are secured by equipment with a carrying value $53,476 (2015: $58,610). The capital lease obligations bear fixed interest rates ranging from 4.5% to 5.5% and have maturity dates ranging from 2017 to 2020.

(c)        Secured equipment loans

Equipment loans are secured by equipment with a carrying value of $50,752 (2015: $53,460). The loans are repayable in monthly installments and bear fixed interest rates ranging from 4.5% to 6.5% and have maturity dates ranging from 2017 to 2020.

18



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Cdn$ in thousands)

(d)        Curis secured loan

As a result of the acquisition of Curis in November 2014, the Company assumed Curis’s secured loan agreement with RK Mine Finance Trust I (“Red Kite”).

On February 1, 2016, the Company repaid the full outstanding principal and accrued interest in the amount of $43,767 with proceeds from a new senior secured credit facility (Note 17e).

(e)        Senior secured credit facility

On January 29, 2016, the Company entered into a US$70 million senior secured credit facility (the “Facility”) with EXP T1 Ltd., an affiliate of Red Kite. Amounts drawn under the Facility accrue interest on a monthly basis at a rate of three-month LIBOR plus 7.5% per annum, subject to a minimum LIBOR of 1% per annum. The loan principal and all accrued interest is payable upon maturity of the Facility. The Facility was subject to an up-front arrangement fee of 2.5% payable by Taseko but there are no commitment fees on the undrawn portion of the Facility. The Facility matures on March 29, 2019, as the Company exercised its option and paid an extension fee in June 2016. The Facility is repayable at any time without penalty and does not impose any off-take obligations on the Company.

The Facility is secured by a first priority charge over substantially all assets of the Company, including the Company’s 75% joint venture interest in the Gibraltar Mine, shares in all material subsidiaries and the Florence Copper project assets. The availability of the Facility is subject to conditions and covenants, including maintenance of a minimum working capital balance (as defined in the Facility) of US$20 million. As at December 31, 2016, the Company is in compliance with these covenants.

The first tranche of the Facility was drawn on January 29, 2016 and the proceeds of $46,444 (US$33.2 million) were used to repay the Curis secured loan (Note 17d) and to pay the arrangement fee and other transaction costs. The remainder of the Facility in the amount of $47,161 (US$36.8 million) was drawn during the second quarter of 2016.

In connection with the Facility, the Company has issued a call option for 7,500 tonnes of copper with a strike price of US$2.04/lb. The call option matures in March 2019 and an amount will be payable to Red Kite based on the average copper price during the month of March 2019, subject to a maximum amount of US$15 million. The initial fair value of the copper call option was estimated to be $6,081 and was revalued at $9,440 as at December 31, 2016 (Note 7).

The Company also issued share purchase warrants to acquire 4 million common shares of the Company at any time until May 9, 2019 at an exercise price of $0.51 per share in connection with the Facility. The fair value of the warrants was estimated to be $830 at the date of grant.

As at December 31, 2016, the Company had incurred total deferred debt financing costs of $11,257, which includes the initial fair value of the copper call option, warrants, the arrangement fee, the extension fee and other transaction costs. These costs were initially deferred and subsequently reclassified to the loan on a pro-rata basis as loan amounts were drawn down, and are being amortized over the life of the loan using the effective interest rate method.

    Carrying Value  
    December 31, 2016  
Outstanding principal (US$70 million)   93,989  
Accrued interest   6,482  
Loan obligation   100,471  
Deferred financing costs, net of accretion   (8,988 )
Senior secured credit facility   91,483  

19



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Cdn$ in thousands)

18.    OTHER FINANCIAL LIABILITIES

    As at December 31,  
    2016     2015  
Long-term:            
 Derivative liability - copper call option (Note 17e)   9,440     -  
 Amounts payable to BC Hydro   10,938     -  
 Deferred share units (Note 21b)   1,535     444  
    21,913     444  

For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company has deferred electricity payments of $10,938 under BC Hydro’s five-year power rate deferral program for BC mines. Under the program, effective March 1, 2016, the Gibraltar Mine is able to defer up to 75% of electricity costs. The amount of deferral is based on a formula that incorporates the average copper price during the preceding month. The balance, plus interest at the prime rate plus 5%, will be repayable on a monthly schedule if the average copper price during the preceding month exceeds a threshold amount of $3.40 per pound. Specifically, if the average copper price exceeds the threshold amount, the formula determines an amount of repayment of the previously deferred balance and is based on the most recent month’s electricity cost.. Any remaining deferred balance will be repayable at the end of the five year term. Accordingly, the deferred amounts have been classified as a long-term financial liability.

19.    PROVISION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REHABILITATION

    2016     2015  
Beginning balance at January 1   124,445     110,136  
 Additions during the year   (615 )   373  
 Change in estimates   (27,255 )   11,306  
 Accretion   2,358     2,552  
 Settlements   (438 )   (125 )
 Foreign exchange differences   (41 )   203  
Ending balance at December 31   98,454     124,445  

The provision for environmental rehabilitation (“PER”) represents the present value of estimated costs of legal and constructive obligations required to retire an asset, including decommissioning and other site restoration activities. The majority of these expenditures occur after the end of the life of the related operation. For the Gibraltar Mine, it is anticipated that these costs will be incurred over a period of 100 years beyond the end of the mine life. As at December 31, 2016, the PER was calculated using a pre-tax discount rate of 2.3% (2015 – 2.1%), which is based on the long-term Canadian government bond rate and an inflation rate of 2.0% (2015 – 2.0%) in its cash flow estimates. The decrease in the PER during 2016 is primarily due to the higher discount rate.

During 2012, the Company submitted an updated decommissioning cost report for the Gibraltar Mine to the BC Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources as a requirement to maintain its permits in good standing. The underlying cost assumptions supporting the 2012 decommissioning report reflect management’s best estimate for closure costs and were incorporated into the PER. Estimates are reviewed regularly and there have been adjustments to the amount and timing of cash flows as a result of updated information. Assumptions are based on the current economic environment, but actual rehabilitation costs will ultimately depend upon future market prices for the necessary decommissioning work required, which will reflect market conditions at the relevant time. Furthermore, the timing of rehabilitation will depend on when the mine ceases production which, in turn, will depend on future metal prices, operating conditions and many other factors which are inherently uncertain.

20



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Cdn$ in thousands)

The Company has provided deposits and other financial security for its reclamation obligations which is held in trust by the regulatory authorities. Reclamation deposits (Note 13) are returned once the site is reclaimed to a satisfactory level and there are no ongoing monitoring or maintenance requirements. The Gibraltar Joint Venture has also issued an irrevocable standby letter of credit for $10 million as part of its security with the regulatory authorities. This letter of credit is secured by cash of $10 million in the Gibraltar Joint Venture. For the Florence Copper project, the Company has issued reclamation bonds totaling US$4,853, which are supported by surety bonds of an insurance company. The Company has provided cash collateral of US$1,595 to the surety provider and these amounts are classified as reclamation deposits (Note 12).

20.    EQUITY

(a)        Share capital

(thousands of shares)   Common shares  
Common shares outstanding at January 1, 2015   221,809  
 Exercise of share options   -  
Common shares outstanding at December 31, 2015   221,809  
 Exercise of share options   58  
Common shares outstanding at December 31, 2016   221,867  

The Company’s authorized share capital consists of an unlimited number of common shares with no par value.

(b)        Contributed surplus

Contributed surplus represents employee entitlements to equity settled share-based awards that have been charged to the statement of comprehensive income and loss in the periods during which the entitlements were accrued and have not yet been exercised.

(c)        Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”)

AOCI is comprised of the cumulative net change in the fair value of available-for-sale financial assets, net of taxes, until the investments are sold or impaired and cumulative translation adjustments arising from the translation of foreign subsidiaries.

21.    SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

(a)        Share Options

The Company has an equity settled share option plan approved by the shareholders that allows it to grant options to directors, officers, employees and other service providers. Under the plan, a maximum of 9.5% of the Company’s outstanding common shares may be granted. The maximum allowable number of outstanding options to independent directors as a group at any time is 1% of the Company’s outstanding common shares. The exercise price of an option is set at the time of grant using the five-day volume weighted average price of the common shares. Options are exercisable for a maximum of five years from the effective date of grant under the plan. Vesting conditions of options are at the discretion of the Board of Directors at the time the options are granted.

21



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Cdn$ in thousands)

(thousands of options)   Options     Average price  
Outstanding at January 1, 2015   11,908   $ 3.28  
 Granted   2,680     0.98  
 Forfeited   (241 )   1.95  
 Expired   (2,790 )   4.22  
Outstanding at January 1, 2016   11,557     2.55  
 Granted   2,601     0.38  
 Exercised   (59 )   0.38  
 Forfeited   (313 )   1.40  
 Expired   (1,845 )   5.04  
Outstanding at December 31, 2016   11,941   $ 1.74  
Exercisable at December 31, 2016   9,693   $ 2.00  

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company granted 2,601,000 (2015 – 2,680,000) share options to directors, executives and employees. The total fair value of options granted was $442 (2015 – $1,018) based on a weighted average grant-date fair value of $0.17 (2015 – $0.38) per option. During the year ended December 31, 2016, 58,500 options were exercised. The weighted-average share price at the date of exercise was $0.83 per share.

    Options     Average life  
Range of exercise price   (thousands)     (years)  
$0.38 to $0.68   2,453     3.5  
$0.69 to $1.02   2,469     3.0  
$1.03 to $2.32   3,794     1.9  
$2.33 to $2.80   2,055     0.2  
$2.81 to $2.94   1,170     1.0  
    11,941     2.1  

The fair value at grant date of the share option plan was measured based on the Black-Scholes formula. Expected volatility is estimated by considering historic average share price volatility. The inputs used in the measurement of the fair values at grant date of the share-based payment plans are the following:

    2016     2015  
Expected term (years)   4.49     4.54  
Forfeiture rate   0%     0%  
Volatility   52.5%     48.7%  
Dividend yield   0%     0%  
Risk-free interest rate   0.57%     0.96%  
Weighted-average fair value per option $ 0.17   $ 0.38  

22



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Cdn$ in thousands)

(b)        Deferred Share Units and Performance Share Units

The Company has adopted a Deferred Share Unit (“DSU”) Plan (the “DSU Plan”) that provides for an annual grant of DSUs to each non-employee director of the Company, or an equivalent cash payment in lieu thereof, which participants have agreed would in first instance be used to assist in complying with the Company’s share ownership guidelines. DSUs vest immediately upon grant and are paid out in cash when a participant ceases to be a director of the Company.

The Company has established a Performance Share Unit (“PSU”) Plan (the “PSU Plan”) whereby PSUs are issued to executives as long-term incentive compensation. PSUs issued under the Plan entitle the holder to a cash or equity payment (as determined by the Board of Directors), at the end of a three-year performance period equal to the number of PSU’s granted, adjusted for a performance factor and multiplied by the quoted market value of a Taseko common share on the completion of the performance period. The performance factor can range from 0% to 250% and is determined by comparing the Company’s total shareholder return to those achieved by a peer group of companies.

The continuity of DSUs and PSUs issued and outstanding is as follows:

    DSUs     PSUs  
Outstanding at January 1, 2015   99,371     -  
 Granted   816,000     461,500  
Outstanding at January 1, 2016   915,371     461,500  
 Granted   714,000     1,349,292  
 Settled   (306,000 )   (59,426 )
 Forfeited   -     (44,574 )
Outstanding at December 31, 2016   1,323,371     1,706,792  

During the year ended December 31, 2016, 714,000 DSUs were issued to directors (2015 - 816,000) and 1,349,292 PSUs to senior executives (2015 - 461,500). The fair value of DSUs and PSUs granted was $1,080 (2015 - $1,231), with a weighted average fair value at the grant date of $0.38 per unit for the DSUs (2015 - $0.98 per unit) and ranging between $0.38 and $0.74 per unit for the PSUs (2015 – ranging between $0.77 and $0.98 per unit).

Grants of PSUs during the year ended December 31, 2016, included 887,792 PSU’s issued to executives in lieu of annual incentive plan payments for 2015. The 887,792 PSU’s vest between June 2017 and September 2017, and entitle the holder to a cash or equity payment at that time and do not include a performance factor adjustment. The share-based compensation expense for these units is adjusted at each reporting period to reflect the change in the market value of the Company’s common shares.

For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recognized total share-based compensation expense of $3,682 (2015: $2,002).

23



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Cdn$ in thousands)

22.    COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

(a)        Commitments

    <1 year or                          
    on demand     1 - 2 years     2 - 5 years     >5 years     Total  
At December 31, 2015                              
 Capital lease liability   7,648     8,024     11,917     -     27,589  
 Future interest charges   1,268     837     592     -     2,697  
Capital lease commitments   8,916     8,861     12,509     -     30,286  
Operating lease commitments   3,055     416     848     96     4,415  
Purchase obligations   4,875     -     -     -     4,875  
Capital expenditure commitments   121     -     -     -     121  
At December 31, 2016                              
 Capital lease liability   8,059     7,149     4,768     -     19,976  
 Future interest charges   838     443     149     -     1,430  
Capital lease commitments   8,897     7,592     4,917     -     21,406  
Operating lease commitments   2,441     1,723     2,071     -     6,235  
Purchase obligations   7,273     3,602     602     -     11,477  
Capital expenditure commitments   189     -     -     -     189  

The Gibraltar joint venture (Note 3) is committed to incur capital expenditures of $251 (2015: $161), of which the Company’s share is $189 (2015: $121).

(b)        Contingencies

The Company has guaranteed 100% of certain capital lease and equipment loans entered into by the Gibraltar joint venture in which it holds a 75% interest. As at December 31, 2016, this debt totaled $31,372 on a 75% basis. The Company has an indemnity agreement with Cariboo related to their share of the guarantee, and the Company received a guarantee fee of $66 from Cariboo in 2016 (2015:$20).

23.    SUPPLEMENTARY CASH FLOW INFORMATION

    For the year ended December 31,  
    2016     2015  
Change in non-cash working capital items            
 Accounts receivable   (1,783 )   1,497  
 Inventories   (16,023 )   (4,527 )
 Prepaids   349     10  
 Accounts payable and accrued liabilities   4,010     (12,337 )
 Interest payable   (543 )   534  
 Income tax paid   (750 )   -  
 Income tax received   29     27,504  
    (14,711 )   12,681  
Non-cash investing and financing activities            
Derivative liability - copper call option (Note 17e)   6,081     -  
Share purchase warrants (Note 17e)   830     -  

24



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Cdn$ in thousands)

24.    FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT

(a)        Overview

In the normal course of business, the Company is inherently exposed to market, liquidity and credit risk through its use of financial instruments. The timeframe and manner in which the Company manages these risks varies based upon management’s assessment of the risk and available alternatives for mitigating risk. The Board approves and monitors risk management processes, including treasury policies, counterparty limits, controlling and reporting structures.

(b)        Market risk

Market risk is the risk that the fair value of future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market prices. Market prices comprise three types of risk: commodity price risk; interest rate risk; and currency risk. Financial instruments affected by market risk include: cash and equivalents; accounts receivable; marketable securities; subscription receipts; reclamation deposits; accounts payable and accrued liabilities; debt and derivatives.

The objective of market risk management is to manage and control market risk exposures within acceptable parameters, while optimizing the return. The Company buys and sells copper put options in order to reduce commodity price risk. The derivative instruments employed by the Company are considered to be economic hedges but are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes.

Commodity price risk

The Company is exposed to the risk of fluctuations in prevailing market commodity prices on the metals it produces. To manage the Company’s operating margins effectively in volatile metals markets, the Company enters into copper option contracts. The amount and duration of the hedge position is based on an assessment of business-specific risk elements combined with the copper pricing outlook. Copper option contracts are typically extended adding incremental quarters at established put strike prices to provide the necessary price protection.

Provisional pricing mechanisms embedded within the Company’s sales arrangements have the character of a commodity derivative and are carried at fair value as part of accounts receivable. The table below summarizes the impact on pre-tax earnings and equity for changes in commodity prices on the fair value of derivatives and the provisionally invoiced sales volumes.

    As at December 31,  
    2016     2015  
Copper increase/decrease by US$0.25/lb (2015: US$0.20/lb) 1,2   4,778     5,530  

1 The analysis is based on the assumption that the year-end copper price increases 10 percent with all other variables held constant. The relationship between the year-end copper price and the strike price of copper options has significant influence over the fair value of the derivatives. As such, a 10% decrease in the year-end copper price will not result in an equal but opposite impact on earnings after tax and equity. The closing exchange rate for the year ended December 31, 2016 of CAD/USD 1.3427 (2015: 1.3840) was used in the analysis.
2 At December 31, 2016, 14.0 million (2015: 19.6 million) pounds of copper in concentrate were exposed to copper price movements.

The sensitivities in the above tables have been determined with foreign currency exchange rates held constant. The relationship between commodity prices and foreign currencies is complex and movements in foreign exchange can impact commodity prices. The sensitivities should therefore be used with care.

25



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Cdn$ in thousands)

Interest rate risk

The Company is exposed to interest rate risk on its outstanding debt and investments, including cash and cash equivalents, from the possibility that changes in market interest rates will affect future cash flows or the fair value of fixed-rate interest-bearing financial instruments.

The table below summarizes the impact on earnings after tax and equity for a change of 100 basis points in interest rates at the reporting date. This analysis assumes that all other variables, in particular foreign currency rates, remain constant. This assumes that the change in interest rates is effective from the beginning of the financial year and balances are constant over the year. However, interest rates and balances of the Company may not remain constant in the coming financial year and therefore such sensitivity analysis should be used with care.

    Years ended December 31,  
    2016     2015  
Fair value sensitivity for fixed-rate instruments            
 Capital leases   (200 )   (181 )
 Secured equipment loans   (160 )   (190 )
 Senior notes   (1,960 )   (2,048 )
 Senior secured credit facility   (246 )   -  
    (2,566 )   (2,419 )
Cash flow sensitivity for variable-rate instruments            
 Cash and equivalents   171     99  
 Reclamation deposits   192     203  
    363     302  

Currency risk

The Canadian dollar is the functional currency of the Company and, as a result, currency exposure arises from transactions and balances in currencies other than the Canadian dollar, primarily the US dollar. The Company’s potential currency exposures comprise translational exposure in respect of non-functional currency monetary items, and transactional exposure in respect of non-functional currency revenues and expenditures.

The following table demonstrates the sensitivity to a 10% strengthening in the CAD against the USD. With all other variables held constant, the Company’s shareholders equity and earnings after tax would both increase/(decrease) due to changes in the carrying value of monetary assets and liabilities. A weakening in the CAD against the USD would have had the equal but opposite effect to the amounts shown below.

26



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Cdn$ in thousands)

    Year ended December 31,  
    2016     2015  
Cash and equivalents   (5,429 )   (4,407 )
Accounts receivable   (699 )   (823 )
Copper put option contracts   (12 )   (50 )
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities   283     350  
Equipment loans   547     1,174  
Senior secured credit facility   7,435     -  
Senior notes   20,193     20,814  
Curis secured loan   -     3,173  

The Company’s financial asset and liability profile may not remain constant and, therefore, these sensitivities should be used with care.

(c)        Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they become due. The Company manages liquidity risk by holding sufficient cash and equivalents and scheduling long-term obligations based on estimated cash inflows. There were no defaults on loans payable during the year.

Standard & Poor’s downgraded the Company’s long-term credit rating to CCC+ in January 2016. Moody’s Investor Service has a long-term credit rating for the Company of B3. The Company’s credit profile and significant cash balance ensure that sufficient liquid funds are maintained to meet its daily cash requirements.

The maturity profile of the Company’s financial liabilities based on contractual undiscounted amounts are:

27



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Cdn$ in thousands)

    <1 year or                          
    demand     1 - 2 years     2 - 5 years     >5 years     Total  
At December 31, 2016                              
 Accounts payable and accrued liabilities   33,416     -     -     -     33,416  
 Expected future interest payments   22,034     21,391     6,292     -     49,717  
 Capital leases   8,059     7,149     4,768     -     19,976  
 Secured equipment loans   8,098     1,551     1,747     -     11,396  
 Senior notes   -     -     268,540     -     268,540  
 Senior secured credit facility   -     -     121,787     -     121,787  
 Copper call option   -     -     9,440     -     9,440  
    71,607     30,091     412,574     -     514,272  
Carrying amount   49,571     8,700     384,966     -     443,237  
At December 31, 2015                              
 Accounts payable and accrued liabilities   30,143     -     -     -     30,143  
 Expected future interest payments   23,594     22,679     28,510     -     74,783  
 Capital leases   7,648     8,024     11,917     -     27,589  
 Secured equipment loans   9,276     8,268     3,316     -     20,860  
 Senior notes   -     -     276,800     -     276,800  
 Current portion of long-term debt (incl. interest)   44,863     -     -     -     44,863  
    115,524     38,971     320,543     -     475,038  
Carrying amount   91,930     16,292     292,033     -     400,255  

(d)        Credit risk

Credit risk is the risk of potential loss to the Company if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations. The Company is exposed to credit risk from its receivables, marketable securities and investments, and derivatives. In general, the Company manages its credit exposure by transacting only with reputable counterparties. The Company monitors the financial condition of its customers and counterparties to contracts. The Company deals with a limited number of counterparties for its metal sales. The Company had two significant customers in 2016 that represented 65% and 30% of gross copper concentrate revenues, respectively. The trade receivable balance at December 31, 2016 and 2015, is comprised of three customers. There are no impairments recognized on the trade receivables.

28



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Cdn$ in thousands)

(e)        Fair values of financial instruments

The fair values of financial assets and liabilities, together with their carrying amounts, are presented by class in the following table. The table does not include fair value information for financial assets and liabilities not measured at fair value if the carrying amount is a reasonable approximation of fair value.

    December 31, 2016     December 31, 2015  
    Carrying           Carrying        
    amount     Fair value     amount     Fair value  
Financial assets                        
Fair value through profit and loss (FVTPL)                        
 Copper put option contracts   155     155     671     671  
Loans and receivables                        
 Cash   89,030     -     68,521     -  
 Other financial assets (Note 2.4)   7,500     -     7,500     -  
Accounts receivable   12,905     -     13,199     -  
Available-for-sale                        
 Marketable securities   1,419     1,419     931     931  
 Subscription receipts   10,333     10,333     10,333     10,333  
 Reclamation deposits   30,535     30,535     30,352     30,352  
Financial liabilities                        
Financial liabilities                        
 Accounts payable and accrued liabilities   33,416     -     30,143     -  
 Interest payable on senior notes   4,336     -     4,469     -  
 Senior notes   266,435     223,026     273,876     139,507  
 Senior secured credit facility   91,483     91,933     -     -  
 Capital leases   19,976     20,201     27,589     29,510  
 Secured equipment loans   11,396     11,376     20,860     20,797  
 Curis secured loan   -     -     42,877     42,877  

29



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Cdn$ in thousands)

The Company uses the fair value hierarchy described in note 2.5(c) for determining the fair value of instruments that are measured at fair value.

    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total  
December 31, 2016                        
Financial assets designated at FVTPL                        
 Copper put option contracts   -     155     -     155  
Available-for-sale financial assets                        
 Marketable Securities   1,419     -     -     1,419  
 Subscription receipts (Note 12)   -     -     10,333     10,333  
 Reclamation deposits   30,535     -     -     30,535  
    31,954     155     10,333     42,442  
December 31, 2015                        
Financial assets designated at FVTPL                        
 Copper put option contracts   -     671     -     671  
Available-for-sale financial assets                        
 Marketable Securities   931     -     -     931  
 Subscription receipts (Note 12)   -     -     10,333     10,333  
 Reclamation deposits   30,352     -     -     30,352  
    31,283     671     10,333     42,287  

There have been no transfers between fair value levels during the reporting period.

The senior notes, a level 1 instrument, are valued based upon publicly available information. The capital leases and secured equipment loans, level 2 instruments, are fair valued through discounting future cash flows at a rate of 5.5% based on the relevant loans effective interest rate.

The fair values of the level 2 instruments, copper put option contracts, are based on broker quotes. Similar contracts are traded in an active market and the broker quotes reflect the actual transactions in similar instruments.

The subscription receipts, a level 3 instrument, are valued based on a third party transaction. The fair value of the subscription receipts is based upon the most recent transaction, and there was no change in the recorded fair value during 2016.

(f)        Capital management

The Company's primary objective when managing capital is to ensure that the Company is able to continue its operations and that it has sufficient ability to satisfy its capital obligations and ongoing operational expenses, as well as to have sufficient liquidity available to fund suitable business opportunities as they arise.

The Company considers the components of shareholders' equity, as well as its cash and equivalents, credit facilities and debt as capital. The Company manages its capital structure and makes adjustments to it in light of changes in economic conditions and the risk characteristics of the underlying assets. In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Company may issue or buy back equity, issue, buy back or repay debt, sell assets, or return capital to shareholders.

30



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Cdn$ in thousands)

    December 31,     December 31,  
    2016     2015  
Cash   89,030     68,521  
Current portion of long-term debt   16,157     59,801  
Long-term debt   373,133     305,401  
Net debt   300,260     296,681  
Shareholders’ equity   338,939     370,340  

In order to facilitate the management of its capital requirements, the Company prepares annual operating budgets that are approved by the Board of Directors. Management also actively monitors its financial covenants to ensure compliance. The Company’s investment policy is to invest its cash in highly liquid interest-bearing investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash. There were no changes to the Company's approach to capital management during the year ended December 31, 2016.

25.    RELATED PARTIES

(a)        Subsidiaries

    Ownership interest as at  
    December 31,     December 31,  
    2016     2015  
Gibraltar Mines Ltd.   100%     100%  
Curis Resources Ltd.   100%     100%  
Curis Holdings (Canada) Ltd.   100%     100%  
Florence Copper Inc.   100%     100%  
Aley Corporation   100%     100%  
672520 BC Ltd.   100%     100%  

(b)        Key management personnel compensation

Key management personnel include the members of the Board of Directors and executive officers of the Company.

The Company contributes to a post-employment defined contribution pension plan on the behalf of certain key management personnel. This retirement compensation arrangement (“RCA” Trust) was established to provide benefits to certain executive officers on or after retirement in recognition of their long service. Upon retirement, the participant is entitled to the distribution of the accumulated value of the contributions under the RCA Trust. Obligations for contributions to the defined contribution pension plan are recognized as compensation expense in profit or loss in the periods during which services are rendered by the executive officers.

Certain executive officers are entitled to termination and change in control benefits. In the event of termination without cause, other than a change in control, these executive officers are entitled to an amount ranging from 9-month to 12-months’ salary. In the event of a change in control, if a termination without cause or a resignation occurs within 12 months following the change of control, these executive officers are entitled to receive, among other things, an amount ranging from 24-month to 32-months’ salary and accrued bonus, and all stock options held by these individuals will fully vest.

Executive officers and directors also participate in the Company’s share option program (Note 21).

31



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Cdn$ in thousands)

Compensation for key management personnel (includes all members of the Board of Directors and executive officers) is as follows:

    Year ended December 31,  
    2016     2015  
Salaries and benefits   5,050     4,744  
Post-employment benefits   1,309     1,400  
Share-based compensation   3,602     1,558  
    9,961     7,702  

(c)        Related party transactions

    Transaction value for the     Due (to) from related parties  
    year end December 31,     as at December 31,  
    2016     2015     2016     2015  
Hunter Dickinson Services Inc.:                        
 General and administrative expenses   1,400     2,254              
 Exploration and evaluation expenses   40     153              
    1,440     2,407     (61 )   (51 )
Gibraltar Joint Venture:                        
 Management fee income   1,043     1,139              
 Reimbursable compensation expenses and third party costs   105     107          
    1,148     1,246     162     235  

Three directors of the Company are also principals of Hunter Dickinson Services Inc. (“HDSI”), a private company. HDSI invoices the Company for their executive services (director fees) and for other services provided by HDSI. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company incurred total costs of $1,440 (2015: $2,407) in transactions with HDSI. Of these, $643 (2015: $854) related to administrative, legal, exploration and tax services, $517 related to reimbursements of office rent costs (2015: $490), and $280 (2015: $280) related to director fees for two Taseko directors who are also principals of HDSI. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company also incurred costs of $783 through HDSI related to compensation of Taseko’s CEO who is also a principal of HDSI.

Under the terms of the joint venture operating agreement, the Gibraltar Joint Venture pays the Company a management fee for services rendered by the Company as operator of the Gibraltar Mine. In addition, the Company pays certain expenses on behalf of the Gibraltar Joint Venture and invoices the Joint Venture for these expenses.

26.    SUBSEQUENT EVENT

In February 2017, the Company issued 2 million common shares to Red Kite for proceeds of $1,020, upon the partial exercise of warrants that were issued in connection with the senior secured credit facility (Note 17e). The remaining 2 million share purchase warrants held by Red Kite are exercisable at any time until May 9, 2019.

32




TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
 

This management discussion and analysis ("MD&A") is intended to help the reader understand Taseko Mines Limited (“Taseko”, “we”, “our” or the “Company”), our operations, financial performance, and current and future business environment. This MD&A is intended to supplement and complement the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Financial Statements”). You are encouraged to review the Financial Statements in conjunction with your review of this MD&A and the Company’s other public filings, which are available on the Canadian Securities Administrators’ website at www.sedar.com and on the EDGAR section of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) website at www.sec.gov.

This MD&A is prepared as of February 21, 2017. All dollar figures stated herein are expressed in Canadian dollars, unless otherwise specified.

Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Information

This discussion includes certain statements that may be deemed "forward-looking statements". All statements in this discussion, other than statements of historical facts, that address future production, reserve potential, exploration drilling, exploitation activities, and events or developments that the Company expects are forward-looking statements. Although we believe the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include market prices, exploitation and exploration successes, continued availability of capital and financing and general economic, market or business conditions. Investors are cautioned that any such statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. All of the forward-looking statements made in this MD&A are qualified by these cautionary statements. We disclaim any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except to the extent required by applicable law. Further information concerning risks and uncertainties associated with these forward-looking statements and our business may be found in the Company’s other public filings with the SEC and Canadian provincial securities regulatory authorities.

1



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
 

CONTENTS

OVERVIEW 3
   
HIGHLIGHTS 3
   
REVIEW OF OPERATIONS 5
   
GIBRALTAR OUTLOOK 7
   
REVIEW OF PROJECTS 8
   
MARKET REVIEW 9
   
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE 9
   
FINANCIAL CONDITION REVIEW 13
   
SELECTED ANNUAL INFORMATION 17
   
FOURTH QUARTER RESULTS 18
   
SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS 24
   
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES 24
   
CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING POLICIES 25
   
INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES 25
   
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS 26
   
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS 27
   
NON-GAAP PERFORMANCE MEASURES 29

2



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
 

OVERVIEW

Taseko Mines Limited (“Taseko” or “Company”) is a mining company that seeks to create shareholder value by acquiring, developing, and operating large tonnage mineral deposits which, under conservative forward metal price assumptions, are potentially capable of supporting a mine for ten years or longer. The Company’s sole operating asset is the 75% owned Gibraltar Mine, a large copper mine located in central British Columbia. The Gibraltar Mine has undergone a major expansion in recent years and is now one of the largest copper mines in North America. Taseko also owns the New Prosperity gold-copper, Aley niobium, Florence copper and Harmony gold projects.

HIGHLIGHTS

    Three months ended     Year ended  
Financial Data   December 31,     December 31,  
(Cdn$ in thousands, except for per share amounts)   2016     2015     Change     2016     2015     Change  
Revenues   94,628     61,412     33,216     263,865     289,298     (25,433 )
Earnings from mining operations before depletion                                    
and amortization*   46,617     2,155     44,462     54,715     50,834     3,881  
Earnings (loss) from mining operations   37,393     (10,674 )   48,067     1,776     1,320     456  
Net income (loss)   5,113     (23,441 )   28,554     (31,396 )   (62,352 )   30,956  
   Per share - basic (“EPS”)   0.02     (0.10 )   0.12     (0.14 )   (0.28 )   0.14  
Adjusted net income (loss) *   16,404     (13,112 )   29,516     (31,860 )   (15,531 )   (16,329 )
   Per share - basic (“adjusted EPS”) *   0.07     (0.06 )   0.13     (0.14 )   (0.08 )   (0.06 )
EBITDA *   32,312     (9,162 )   41,474     39,520     8,196     31,324  
Adjusted EBITDA *   44,477     1,415     43,062     41,628     55,555     (13,927 )
Cash flows provided by operations   49,663     1,859     47,804     33,853     51,695     (17,842 )
                                     

    Three months ended                    
Operating Data (Gibraltar - 100% basis)   December 31,     Year ended December 31,  
    2016     2015     Change     2016     2015     Change  
Tons mined (millions)   18.5     21.3     (2.8 )   87.6     93.7     (6.1 )
Tons milled (millions)   7.3     7.3     -     29.5     30.6     (1.1 )
Production (million pounds Cu)   40.7     33.1     7.6     133.3     142.2     (8.9 )
Sales (million pounds Cu)   40.4     33.7     6.7     131.1     142.5     (11.4 )

*Non-GAAP performance measure. See page 29 of this MD&A.

3



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
 

HIGHLIGHTS - CONTINUED

Fourth Quarter Highlights

2016 Annual Highlights

*Non-GAAP performance measure. See page 29 of this MD&A

4


REVIEW OF OPERATIONS

Gibraltar mine (75% Owned)

Operating Data (100% basis)   Q4 2016     Q3 2016     Q2 2016     Q1 2016     Q4 2015     YE 2016     YE 2015  
Tons mined (millions)   18.5     21.5     26.2     21.5     21.3     87.6     93.7  
Tons milled (millions)   7.3     7.4     7.2     7.5     7.3     29.5     30.6  
Strip ratio   1.1     1.0     2.4     1.7     2.4     1.5     2.4  
Site operating cost per ton milled (CAD$) $ 9.13   $ 9.47   $ 9.67   $ 9.59   $ 9.41   $ 9.47   $ 9.83  
Copper concentrate                                          
   Grade (%)   0.319     0.259     0.252     0.228     0.269     0.264     0.272  
   Recovery (%)   87.0     85.9     84.1     84.4     84.9     85.5     85.1  
   Production (million pounds Cu)   40.7     33.1     30.6     28.8     33.1     133.2     141.2  
   Sales (million pounds Cu)   40.4     29.8     30.3     30.5     33.7     131.1     141.4  
   Inventory (million pounds Cu)   5.6     5.4     2.1     1.9     3.4     5.6     3.4  
Molybdenum concentrate                                          
   Production (thousand pounds Mo)   764     185     -     -     -     949     963  
   Sales (thousand pounds Mo)   798     105     -     -     -     903     1,003  
Silver (in copper concentrate)                                          
   Sales (thousand ozs Ag)   77     56     59     57     63     249     293  
Per unit data (US$ per pound) *                                          
   Site operating costs * $ 1.23   $ 1.64   $ 1.77   $ 1.81   $ 1.55   $ 1.58   $ 1.65  
   By-product credits *   (0.11 )   (0.06 )   (0.03 )   (0.03 )   (0.03 )   (0.06 )   (0.06 )
Site operating, net of by-product credits * $ 1.12   $ 1.58   $ 1.74   $ 1.78   $ 1.52   $ 1.52   $ 1.59  
Off-property costs   0.36     0.31     0.33     0.33     0.33     0.33     0.37  
Total operating costs (C1) * $ 1.48   $ 1.89   $ 2.07   $ 2.11   $ 1.85   $ 1.85   $ 1.96  

*Non-GAAP performance measure. See page 29 of this MD&A

5



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
 

OPERATIONS ANALYSIS

Fourth quarter results

Despite challenging weather conditions in the fourth quarter, Gibraltar mill throughput was 7.3 million tons of ore, a similar amount to the previous quarters in 2016. A total of 18.5 million tons were mined during the quarter, at a strip ratio of 1.1. A total of 2.4 million tons of ore was added to stockpile in the period. In addition, the copper head grade for the fourth quarter increased to 0.32%, slightly better than planned.

Copper recovery also increased to 87% compared to 86% in the previous quarter, as a result of higher head grade and continued improvements in operating practices. The higher head grades and recoveries resulted in copper production of 41 million pounds for the fourth quarter, a 23% increase over the third quarter of 2016.

The fourth quarter was the first full quarter that the molybdenum plant has operated since it was restarted in September. A total of 0.8 million pounds of molybdenum were produced in the quarter, with recoveries averaging approximately 50%.

The total site spending has been maintained at a consistent and low level in recent quarters. Site operating cost per ton milled* was $9.13 in the fourth quarter of 2016, which is lower than recent quarters due to increased capitalized stripping.

Site operating costs per pound produced* decreased to US$1.12 in the fourth quarter of 2016 from US$1.58 in the third quarter of 2016 primarily as a result of increased copper production. The higher molybdenum by-product credit and increase in capitalized stripping allocation also contributed to the lower unit cost in the fourth quarter.

Off-property costs were US$0.36 per pound for the fourth quarter of 2016, which is higher than recent quarters as a higher portion of shipments were made to the Company’s joint venture partner at benchmark terms, as opposed to Gibraltar’s normal treatment and refining costs which are lower than benchmark terms.

Total operating costs (C1) per pound* decreased to US$1.48 from US$1.89 in the third quarter of 2016 as a result of increased copper production.

Full-year results

Gibraltar’s copper production in 2016 was 133 million pounds, a 6% decrease over 2015 due to lower average head grade and mill throughput.

Site operating costs* for the year were US$1.58 per pound of copper produced, a 4% reduction from 2015, as the Company realized a full year of benefit from the cost saving initiatives implemented in the prior year. These initiatives included a mine optimization based on a new mine plan, workforce reduction and rationalization, and vendor engagement resulting in decreased cost of supplies and services. The benefit of these cost savings resulted in lower unit costs in 2016, even though copper production was 6% lower than the previous year.

Off property costs were US$0.33 per pound of copper produced, an 11% reduction over 2015 as a result of new long-term contracts for treatment and refining costs and ocean freight.

Total operating costs (C1)* fell to US$1.85 per pound for the year, compared to US$1.96 per pound in 2015.

*Non-GAAP performance measure. See page 29 of this MD&A

6



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
 

Health and Safety Milestones

The health, safety, and well-being of our employees, contractors and their families is a priority for Taseko and Gibraltar management. Actual performance is a reflection of that commitment.

For the third straight year (2016), Gibraltar has received the John Ash Safety Award presented by the Ministry of Energy and Mines. This prestigious award goes to the mining operation in British Columbia with the lowest injury-frequency rate that has worked at least one million hours during the year.

TSM Initiatives

Taseko is a member of the Mining Association of Canada and the Mining Association of British Columbia. Both of these organizations require members to participate in a program known as Towards Sustainable Mining (“TSM”) which encourages companies to work towards best management practice standards through self-regulation and reporting on key performance areas. These areas include:

Taseko and Gibraltar’s performance and reporting on performance in all of the areas was verified by an external auditor as being at a level of industry best practice. Further details can be found on the Taseko website.

GIBRALTAR OUTLOOK

Average head grade is expected to be approximately 0.30% in 2017.

Overall, Gibraltar has achieved a stable level of operations consistent with the updated reserve model published in 2015 and the Company continues to focus on further improvements to operating practices to reduce unit costs. During September 2016, the molybdenum circuit at Gibraltar was successfully restarted, and will continue to contribute by-product credits in future periods.

The Canadian dollar is expected to remain at a substantial discount to the US dollar. A weak Canadian dollar contributes to improved operating margins at Gibraltar as approximately 80% of mine operating costs are paid in Canadian dollars.

7



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
 

REVIEW OF PROJECTS

Taseko’s strategy has been to grow the Company by leveraging cash flow from the Gibraltar Mine to assemble and develop a pipeline of projects. We continue to believe this will generate the best, long-term returns for shareholders. Our development projects are located in British Columbia and Arizona and represent a diverse range of metals, including gold, copper and niobium. Total expenditures on projects in 2016 consisted of $5.0 million at the Florence Copper project, $1.7 million on New Prosperity, and $0.8 million on the Aley Project. Taseko will continue to take a prudent approach to spending on development projects.

Florence Copper Project

The Florence Copper project is currently in the final stages of permitting for the Production Test Facility (“PTF”). The PTF will include a well field comprised of thirteen (four injection and nine recovery) commercial scale production wells and numerous monitoring, observation and point of compliance wells, and also an integrated demonstration scale solvent extraction and electrowinning plant.

During 2016, the Company worked with the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (“ADEQ”) in connection with the amendment to the Temporary Aquifer Protection Permit (“APP”), and with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) in connection with the Underground Injection Control (“UIC”) permit.

On August 2, 2016, the Company announced the receipt from the ADEQ of the APP permit. This permit was issued following a public comment period earlier in 2016, and confirms the ADEQ has completed its substantive review and is satisfied with the conditions under which the PTF can operate. In December 2016, the EPA issued the final required permit, the UIC permit, to construct and operate the PTF. Opposing parties have appealed both the APP and the UIC permits granted, but we expect that the regulatory authorities will successfully defend their thorough processes. Both of these two permits are required for construction and operation of the PTF.

On January 16, 2017, the Company announced that completed technical work on the Florence Copper Project has resulted in a significant improvement in project economics. The NI 43-101 technical report documenting these results will be filed on www.sedar.com within 45 days.

Project Highlights:

New Prosperity Project

The two Judicial Reviews initiated by Taseko were heard in federal court over a five day period in the week of January 30, 2017. Both Judicial Reviews focus on the principles of administrative and procedural fairness. Taseko’s allegation is that the Government of Canada, through the conduct of the environmental assessment and the decisions which resulted from it, failed in their obligation to uphold those fundamental principles. A decision is expected from the court within six to nine months.

On February 12, 2016, Taseko announced that it had filed a civil claim in the BC Supreme Court against the Canadian federal government. The claim seeks damages in relation to the February 25, 2014 decision concerning the New Prosperity Project in that the Government of Canada and its agents failed to meet the legal duties that were owed to Taseko and that in doing so they caused and continue to cause damages, expenses and loss to Taseko.

8



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
 

Taseko is proceeding with its request to amend the British Columbia environmental assessment certificate for the New Prosperity Project. In addition, Taseko has filed a Notice of Work (“NOW”) with the Ministry of Energy & Mines which will allow the Company to gather information to advance mine permitting under the British Columbia Mines Act.

MARKET REVIEW

Prices (USD per pound for Commodities) (Source: Bloomberg)

During 2016, volatility of commodity prices has continued with notably stronger copper prices in late 2016. The global economic uncertainty has led to various copper price increases and decreases over short periods of time. The U.S. election, Chinese economic demand, the United Kingdom’s EU membership referendum, copper supply disruptions, and interest rate expectations have all contributed to this volatility over the last year.

The average price of London Metals Exchange (“LME”) copper was US$2.39 per pound in the fourth quarter of 2016, which was 11% higher than the third quarter of 2016 and about 8% higher than the fourth quarter of 2015. Approximately 80% of the Gibraltar Mine's costs are Canadian dollar denominated and therefore, fluctuations in the Canadian/US dollar exchange rate can have a significant effect on our operating results and unit production costs, which are reported in US dollars per pound.

FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

Earnings

The Company realized a net loss of $31.4 million ($0.14 loss per share) for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to net loss of $62.4 million ($0.28 loss per share) for 2015. The smaller net loss was primarily due to a lower unrealized foreign exchange loss on the Company’s US dollar denominated debt, partially offset by increases in derivative losses.

Earnings from mining operations before depletion and amortization* was $54.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to $50.8 million for the same prior period in 2015. The increase in earnings from mining operations was a result of lower production costs, partially offset by lower revenue for the year.

9



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
 

Included in net earnings (loss) are a number of items that management believes require adjustment in order to better measure the underlying performance of the business. The following items have been adjusted as management believes they are not indicative of a realized economic gain/loss or the underlying performance of the business in the period:

    Year ended  
    December 31,  
(Cdn$ in thousands)   2016     2015     Change  
Net loss   (31,396 )   (62,352 )   30,956  
 Unrealized loss on derivatives   4,404     3,131     1,273  
 Unrealized foreign exchange (gain) loss   (7,785 )   43,809     (51,594 )
 Write-down of marketable securities   -     419     (419 )
 Non-recurring other expenses   5,489     -     5,489  
 Estimated tax effect of adjustments   (2,572 )   (538 )   (2,034 )
Adjusted net loss *   (31,860 )   (15,531 )   (16,329 )

*Non-GAAP performance measure. See page 29 of this MD&A

Unrealized gains/losses on derivatives can vary materially each period and have a significant impact on earnings.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Canadian dollar strengthened in comparison to the prior period end resulting in an unrealized foreign exchange gain of $7.8 million. The unrealized foreign exchange gain was primarily driven by the translation of the Company’s US dollar denominated debt.

Other non-recurring expenses relates to special shareholder meeting costs and other non-recurring financing costs. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company has incurred total costs of $4.9 million on legal and other advisory costs associated with a special shareholder meeting, a proxy contest and related litigation, and $0.6 million on other non-recurring financing costs.

Revenues                  
    Year ended  
    December 31,  
(Cdn$ in thousands)   2016     2015     Change  
Copper in concentrate   283,401     311,890     (28,489 )
Copper cathode   -     2,211     (2,211 )
Molybdenum concentrate   5,900     5,036     864  
Silver contained in copper concentrate   3,988     3,795     193  
Total gross revenue   293,289     322,932     (29,643 )
Less: treatment and refining costs   (29,424 )   (33,634 )   4,210  
Revenue   263,865     289,298     (25,433 )
                   
(thousands of pounds, unless otherwise noted)                  
Copper in concentrate *   94,734     103,033     (8,299 )
Copper cathode   -     763     (763 )
Total copper sales   94,734     103,796     (9,062 )
Average realized copper price (US$ per pound)   2.26     2.37     (0.11 )
Average LME copper price (US$ per pound)   2.21     2.49     (0.28 )
Average exchange rate (US$/CAD)   1.32     1.28     0.04  

* This amount includes a net smelter payable deduction of approximately 3.5% to derive net payable pounds of copper sold.

10



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
 

Copper revenues for the year ended December 31, 2016 decreased by $30.7 million, compared to the same periods in 2015, primarily due to the decrease in copper sales volumes and lower realized copper prices. The decrease in the US dollar realized price of copper was partially offset by the impact of the weaker Canadian dollar in 2016.

The molybdenum circuit was idled in the third quarter of 2015 and restarted in September 2016. The Company recognized molybdenum revenue of $5.9 million after the restart of the molybdenum circuit in 2016.

Cost of sales                  
    Year ended  
    December 31,  
(Cdn$ in thousands)   2016     2015     Change  
Site operating costs   209,381     225,306     (15,925 )
Transportation costs   16,507     17,129     (622 )
Changes in inventories of finished goods and ore stockpile   (16,738 )   (3,971 )   (12,767 )
Production costs   209,150     238,464     (29,314 )
Depletion and amortization   52,939     49,514     3,425  
Cost of sales   262,089     287,978     (25,889 )
Site operating costs per ton milled* $ 9.47   $ 9.83   $ (0.36 )

*Non-GAAP performance measure. See page 29 of this MD&A

Site operating costs for the year ended December 31, 2016 decreased by 7% from 2015, due to cost control initiatives which were implemented during 2015, including the mine plan modifications, workforce reductions and vendor initiatives.

Depletion and amortization for the year ended December 31, 2016 increased by 7% from 2015, primarily due to the increased amortization of capitalized stripping costs.

Other operating (income) expenses                  
    Year ended  
    December 31,  
(Cdn$ in thousands)   2016     2015     Change  
General and administrative   11,299     13,892     (2,593 )
Share-based compensation   3,619     1,885     1,734  
Exploration and evaluation   2,087     928     1,159  
Realized (gain) loss on copper put options   1,956     (16,399 )   18,355  
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments   4,404     3,131     1,273  
Other (income) expenses:                  
   Special shareholder meeting costs   4,894     -     4,894  
   Other financing costs   616     -     616  
   Write-down of marketable securities   -     419     (419 )
   Other income   (1,438 )   (1,856 )   418  
    27,437     2,000     25,437  

11



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
 

General and administrative costs have decreased for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015, primarily due to the Company’s cost reduction initiatives.

Share-based compensation increased for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015, primarily due to the timing of grants of share-based compensation to directors, executives and employees. The increase also includes valuation adjustments of the deferred share units and performance share units at the end of a reporting period to reflect an increase in the Company’s share price.

Exploration and evaluation costs for the year ended December 31, 2016, represent costs associated with the New Prosperity and Aley projects.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recognized a realized loss of $2.0 million from copper put options. The realized gain in 2015 relates to copper put options that settled in-the-money and from the early settlement of copper put options that were scheduled to mature between February and June 2015.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company has incurred total costs of $4.9 million on legal and other advisory costs associated with a special shareholder meeting, a proxy contest and related litigation, and $0.6 million on other non-recurring financing costs.

Finance income and expenses

Finance expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016, increased by $4.1 million over the prior year due to additional interest expense and amortization of finance costs on the new senior secured credit facility, offset by lower interest expense on capital leases and equipment loans.

Finance income is primarily comprised of income earned on the reclamation deposits.

Income tax

    Year ended  
    December 31,  
(Cdn$ in thousands)   2016     2015     Change  
Current income tax expense   836     719     117  
Deferred income tax recovery   (15,549 )   (6,324 )   (9,225 )
    (14,713 )   (5,605 )   (9,108 )
Effective tax rate   31.9%     8.2%     23.7%  
Canadian statutory rate   26.0%     26.0%     -  
B.C. Mineral tax rate   9.6%     9.6%     -  

The current tax expense recorded is the estimated B.C. Mineral taxes based on production at the Gibraltar Mine for the year.

The effective tax rate for the year 2016 was 31.9%, which is lower than the statutory rate of 35.6% . The difference is a result of permanent differences related to non-deductible share-based compensation and expenditures incurred that are not deductible for B.C. Mineral tax.

12



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
 

FINANCIAL CONDITION REVIEW

Balance sheet review

    As at December 31,        
(Cdn$ in thousands)   2016     2015     Change  
Cash and equivalents   89,030     68,521     20,509  
Other current assets   76,297     57,039     19,258  
Non-current assets   730,208     794,758     (64,550 )
Other assets   53,904     53,891     13  
Total assets   949,439     974,209     (24,770 )
Current liabilities   38,641     35,650     2,991  
Debt:                  
 Senior secured credit facility   91,483     -     91,483  
 Capital leases and secured equipment loans   31,372     48,449     (17,077 )
 Senior notes   266,435     273,876     (7,441 )
 Curis secured loan   -     42,877     (42,877 )
Other liabilities   182,569     203,017     (20,448 )
Total liabilities   610,500     603,869     6,631  
Equity   338,939     370,340     (31,401 )
Net debt   300,260     296,681     3,579  
Total common shares outstanding (millions)   221.9     221.8     0.1  

The Company’s asset base is comprised principally of non-current assets, including property, plant and equipment, reflecting the capital intensive nature of the mining business. Other current assets include accounts receivable, other financial assets and inventories (supplies and production inventories), along with prepaid expenses and deposits. Production inventories, accounts receivable and cash balances fluctuate in relation to shipping and cash settlement schedules.

The Curis secured loan was repaid using the proceeds from a new secured credit facility that was entered into on January 29, 2016. Overall debt increased by $24.1 million, due to the proceeds from the new secured credit facility, partially offset by repayments of capital leases and equipment loans and by foreign exchange adjustments on the Company’s US dollar denominated debt.

The change in the provision for environmental rehabilitation is driven by changes in inflation and discounts rates during the year ended December 31, 2016. The Bank of Canada long-term benchmark bond rate used as a proxy for long-term discount rates increased to 2.3% at December 31, 2016 from 2.2% at December 31, 2015. Given the long time frame over which environmental rehabilitation expenditures are expected to be incurred (over 100 years), the carrying value of the provision is very sensitive to changes in discount rates.

Other liabilities decreased to $182.6 million mainly due to the decrease in the provision for environmental rehabilitation (“PER”) and the deferred tax liability, partially offset by the increase to the derivative liability associated with the new credit facility and the BC hydro payment deferrals.

As at February 21, 2017, there were 223,867,138 common shares outstanding. In addition, there were 11,710,000 director and employee stock options and 2,000,000 warrants outstanding at February 21, 2017. More information on these instruments and the terms of their exercise is set out in Notes 17e and 20 of the December 31, 2016 annual consolidated financial statements.

13



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
 

Liquidity, cash flow and capital resources

At December 31, 2016, the Company had cash and equivalents of $89.0 million, a $20.5 million increase over the prior year as the Company maintained a strategy of retaining a significant cash balance to reflect the volatile and capital intensive nature of the copper mining business. For the first nine months of 2016, the Company had net cash outflows of $25.6 million from operating and investing activities, and these losses were funded in part by proceeds from the new senior secured credit facility which was entered into in January 2016. In the fourth quarter of 2016, the increase in copper prices and head grades resulted in net cash inflows of $40.3 million from operating and investing activities. Copper head grades are expected to remain at similar levels as experienced in the fourth quarter of 2016 through 2017, and as a result, copper production and cash flows are expected to improve significantly over the next year.

At current copper prices, we expect that positive cash flows from Gibraltar Mine operations will provide sufficient liquidity to fund the Company’s working capital requirements and debt service obligations for the next year.

The Company has significant debt maturities in 2019, as the US$70 million senior secured credit facility and the US$200 million senior notes will both mature in that year. Cash flows from operations may not be sufficient to meet these debt repayment obligations and the Company may need to arrange refinancing prior to the debt maturities in March and April 2019. To address these financing requirements, the Company may seek to raise additional capital through debt or equity financings, asset sales (including joint ventures or royalties), by renegotiating terms with existing lenders or note holders, or by redeeming or repurchasing senior notes on the market. From time to time, the Company evaluates these alternatives, based on a number of factors including the prevailing market prices of the senior notes, our liquidity requirements, covenant restrictions and other factors, in order to determine the optimal mix of capital resources to address capital requirements, minimize the Company’s cost of capital, and maximize shareholder value.

Future changes in copper and molybdenum market prices could also impact the timing and amount of cash available for future investment in capital projects, debt obligations, and other uses of capital. Changes in metal prices and cash flow can also impact the Company’s compliance with the minimum working capital covenant in the senior secured credit facility. To partially mitigate these risks, copper put options are entered into for a portion of Gibraltar copper production (see section below “Hedging Strategy” ).

Cash flow provided by operations during the year ended December 31, 2016 was $33.9 million compared to $51.7 million provided in 2015. Operating cash flows in 2016 were impacted by non-cash working capital adjustments of negative $14.7 million, which primarily relates to a $16.0 million increase in ore stockpile inventory.

Cash used for investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2016 was $19.1 million compared to $2.8 million used in 2015. Investing activities in 2016 included $9.2 million for capitalized stripping costs, $3.9 million incurred on other capital expenditures for Gibraltar, and $5.8 million in development costs for the Florence and Aley projects.

Cash provided by financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2016 includes the proceeds from the new senior secured credit facility, partially offset by payments for capital leases and equipment loans totaling $16.6 million, and $22.7 million of interest payments.

14



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
 

Senior secured credit facility

On January 29, 2016, the Company entered into a US$70 million Senior Secured Credit Facility (the “Credit Facility”) with EXP T1 Ltd., an affiliate of Red Kite. The Credit Facility consists of an initial tranche of US$33.2 million which has been used to repay the Curis secured loan, and the remainder of the Credit Facility was drawn down in the second quarter of 2016, and is available to the Company for general corporate purposes. Amounts drawn under the Credit Facility accrue interest on a monthly basis at a rate of three-month Libor plus 7.5% per annum, subject to a minimum Libor of 1% per annum. The loan principal and all accrued interest is payable upon maturity of the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility was subject to an up-front arrangement fee of 2.5% payable by Taseko and there are no commitment fees on any undrawn portion of the facility. The Credit Facility matures on March 29, 2019, as the Company exercised its option and paid an extension fee in June 2016. The Credit Facility is repayable without penalty at any time and does not impose any off-take obligations on the Company.

The Credit Facility is secured by a first priority charge over Taseko’s assets, including the Company’s 75% joint venture interest in the Gibraltar Mine, shares in all material subsidiaries and the Florence Copper Project assets. The availability of the Credit Facility is subject to conditions and covenants, including maintenance of a minimum working capital balance of US$20 million. The Company’s balance of working capital (as defined in the Credit Facility agreement) was approximately US$40 million at December 31, 2016. As at December 31, 2016 and the date of this MD&A, the Company is in compliance with all loan covenants.

In connection with the Credit Facility, the Company has issued a call option for 7,500 tonnes of copper with a strike price of US$2.04 per pound. The call option matures in March 2019 and an amount will be payable to Red Kite based on the average copper price during the month of March 2019, subject to a maximum amount of US$15 million.

The Company also issued share purchase warrants to acquire 4 million common shares of the Company at any time until May 9, 2019 at an exercise price of $0.51 per share in connection with the Credit Facility. In February 2017, the Company issued 2 million common shares to Red Kite for proceeds of $1.0 million, upon the partial exercise of warrants that were issued in connection with the Credit Facility.

Senior notes

In April 2011, the Company completed a public offering of US$200 million in senior unsecured notes (the “Notes”). The Notes mature on April 15, 2019, and bear interest at a fixed annual rate of 7.75%, payable semi-annually. The Notes are unsecured obligations guaranteed by the Company’s subsidiaries and the subsidiary guarantees are, in turn, guaranteed by the Company. The Notes are redeemable by the Company at a price equal to 101.938%, and the redemption price declines to 100% in April 2017. The Notes are also repayable upon a change of control at a price of 101%. There are no maintenance covenants with respect to the Company's financial performance. However, the Company is subject to certain restrictions on asset sales, incurrence of additional indebtedness, issuance of preferred stock, dividends and other payment restrictions.

Hedging strategy

The Company’s hedging strategy is to secure a minimum price for a portion of copper production using put options that are either purchased outright or funded by the sale of call options that are significantly out of the money. The amount and duration of the hedge position is based on an assessment of business-specific risk elements combined with the copper pricing outlook. Copper price and quantity exposure are reviewed at least quarterly to ensure that adequate revenue protection is in place. Hedge positions are typically extended adding incremental quarters at established put strike prices to provide the necessary price protection. The Company’s hedging strategy is designed to mitigate short-term declines in copper price.

15



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
 

Considerations on the cost of the hedging program include an assessment of Gibraltar’s estimated production costs, anticipated copper prices and the Company’s capital requirements during the relevant period. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company spent $3.8 million to purchase copper put options. The following table shows the commodity contracts that were outstanding as at the date of this MD&A.

  Notional amount Strike price Term to maturity Original cost
At February 21, 2017        
      Copper put options 10 million lbs US$2.20/lb February and
March 2017
$0.5 million

During 2016, the Company spent $3.8 million to purchase copper put options and received cash proceeds of $3.4 million from the sale or settlement of its copper put options.

Commitments and contingencies

                Payments due                    
($ in thousands)   2017     2018     2019     2020     2021     Thereafter     Total  
Debt 1 :                                          
 Repayment of principal   16,157     8,700     367,693     1,355     -     -     393,905  
 Interest   22,034     21,391     34,074     15     -     -     77,514  
PER 2   -     -     -     -     -     98,454     98,454  
Operating leases   2,441     1,723     1,124     851     96     -     6,235  
Capital expenditures 3   189     -     -     -     -     -     189  
Other expenditures 4   7,273     3,602     602     -     -     -     11,477  

1

As at December 31, 2016, debt is comprised of senior notes, senior secured credit facility, capital leases and secured equipment loans.

2

Provision for environmental rehabilitation amounts presented in the table represents the expected cost of environmental rehabilitation for Gibraltar Mine without considering the effect of discount or inflation rates.

3

Capital expenditure commitments include only those items where the Company has entered into binding commitments.

4

Other expenditure commitments include the purchase of goods and services and exploration activities.

The Company expects to incur capital expenditures during the next five years at the Gibraltar Mine and at its other development projects. The Company will continue to take a prudent approach to spending on development projects.

The Company has guaranteed 100% of certain capital lease and equipment loans entered into by the Gibraltar joint venture in which it holds a 75% interest. As at December 31, 2016, this debt totaled $31.4 million on a 75% basis.

16



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
 

SELECTED ANNUAL INFORMATION

    For years ended December 31,  
(Cdn$ in thousands, except per share amounts)   2016     2015     2014  
Revenues   263,865     289,298     342,946  
Net loss   (31,396 )   (62,352 )   (53,884 )
 Per share – basic   (0.14 )   (0.28 )   (0.27 )
 Per share – diluted   (0.14 )   (0.28 )   (0.27 )

    As at December 31,  
    2016     2015     2014  
Total assets   949,439     974,209     992,542  
Total long-term financial liabilities   395,046     305,845     293,616  

17



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
 

FOURTH QUARTER RESULTS

    Three months ended  
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)         December 31,  
(Cdn$ in thousands, except per share amounts)   2016     2015  
             
Revenues   94,628     61,412  
Cost of sales            
 Production costs   (48,011 )   (59,257 )
 Depletion and amortization   (9,224 )   (12,829 )
Earnings (loss) from mining operations   37,393     (10,674 )
             
General and administrative   (2,101 )   (3,098 )
Share-based compensation   (1,377 )   (339 )
Exploration and evaluation   (359 )   (236 )
Gain (loss) on derivatives   (4,333 )   976  
Other income   404     489  
    29,627     (12,882 )
             
Finance expenses   (8,028 )   (6,433 )
Finance income   297     257  
Foreign exchange loss   (7,922 )   (9,487 )
Income (loss) before income taxes   13,974     (28,545 )
             
Income tax recovery (expense)   (8,861 )   5,104  
Net income (loss) for the period   5,113     (23,441 )
             
Other comprehensive income (loss):            
 Unrealized loss on available-for-sale financial assets   (395 )   (177 )
 Foreign currency translation reserve   2,526     2,410  
Total other comprehensive income for the period   2,131     2,233  
             
Total comprehensive income (loss) for the period   7,244     (21,208 )
             
Earnings (loss) per share            
Basic   0.02     (0.10 )
Diluted   0.02     (0.10 )
             
Weighted-average shares outstanding (thousands)            
Basic   221,846     221,809  
Diluted   227,032     221,809  

18



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
 

    Three months ended  
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows         December 31,  
(Cdn$ in thousands)   2016     2015  
Operating activities            
Net income (loss) for the period   5,113     (23,441 )
 Adjustments for:            
     Depletion and amortization   9,225     12,848  
     Income tax expense (recovery)   8,861     (5,104 )
     Share-based compensation   1,382     359  
     (Gain) loss on derivatives   4,333     (976 )
     Finance expenses (income)   7,731     6,176  
     Unrealized foreign exchange loss   8,802     9,623  
     Deferred electricity payments   2,433     -  
     Other operating activities   (361 )   (121 )
 Net change in non-cash working capital   2,144     2,495  
Cash provided by operating activities   49,663     1,859  
             
Investing activities            
 Purchase of property, plant and equipment   (8,416 )   (6,582 )
 Purchase of copper put options   (1,025 )   -  
 Proceeds from the sale/settlement of copper put options   425     2,583  
 Other investing activities   (330 )   82  
Cash used for investing activities   (9,346 )   (3,917 )
             
Financing activities            
 Repayment of capital leases and equipment loans   (4,510 )   (3,255 )
 Interest paid   (10,804 )   (10,778 )
 Common shares issued on exercise of stock options   12     -  
Cash used for financing activities   (15,302 )   (14,033 )
             
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents   (102 )   1,011  
Increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents   24,913     (15,080 )
Cash and equivalents, beginning of period   64,117     83,601  
Cash and equivalents, end of period   89,030     68,521  

19



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
 

Earnings

The Company realized a net income of $5.1 million ($0.02 earnings per share) for the three months ended December 31, 2016, compared to net loss of $23.4 million ($0.10 loss per share) for the same period in 2015. The increased earnings were due to a significant increase in revenues and operating margins as a result of higher copper production and higher realized copper prices, partially offset by an increased loss on derivatives. Copper sales volumes increased to 40.4 million pounds in the fourth quarter of 2016 from 33.7 million pounds in the prior year’s quarter.

Earnings from mining operations before depletion and amortization* was $46.6 million for the three month period ended December 31, 2016, compared to $2.2 million for the same prior period in 2015. The increase in earnings before depletion and amortization was primarily a result of the increase in copper prices, higher copper production and the increase in molybdenum concentrate revenue due to the September 2016 restart of the molybdenum circuit.

Included in net earnings (loss) are a number of items that management believes require adjustment in order to better measure the underlying performance of the business. The following items have been adjusted as management believes they are not indicative of a realized economic gain/loss or the underlying performance of the business in the period:

    Three months ended  
    December 31,  
(Cdn$ in thousands)   2016     2015     Change  
Net income (loss)   5,113     (23,441 )   28,554  
 Unrealized loss on derivatives   3,363     954     2,409  
 Unrealized foreign exchange loss   8,802     9,623     (821 )
 Estimated tax effect of adjustments   (874 )   (248 )   (626 )
Adjusted net income (loss) *   16,404     (13,112 )   29,516  

*Non-GAAP performance measure. See page 29 on this MD&A

Unrealized gains/losses on derivatives can vary materially each period and have a significant impact on earnings.

In the three months ended December 31, 2016, the Canadian dollar weakened resulting in an unrealized foreign exchange loss of $8.8 million which was primarily due to the translation of the Company’s US dollar denominated debt.

20



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
 

Revenues                  
    Three months ended  
    December 31,  
(Cdn$ in thousands)   2016     2015     Change  
Copper in concentrate   99,375     67,379     31,996  
Molybdenum concentrate   5,189     (78 )   5,267  
Silver contained in copper concentrate   1,018     1,046     (28 )
Total gross revenue   105,582     68,347     37,235  
Less: treatment and refining costs   (10,954 )   (6,935 )   (4,019 )
Revenue   94,628     61,412     33,216  

(thousands of pounds, unless otherwise noted)                  
Copper in concentrate *   29,225     25,049     4,176  
Average realized copper price (US$ per pound)   2.54     2.01     0.53  
Average LME copper price (US$ per pound)   2.39     2.22     0.17  
Average exchange rate (US$ per pound)   1.33     1.34     (0.01 )

* This amount includes a net smelter payable deduction of approximately 3.5% to derive net pounds of copper sold.

Copper revenues for the three months ended December 31, 2016, increased by $32.0 million, compared to the same period in 2015, primarily due to higher sales volumes and the increase in realized copper prices. During the three months ended December 31, 2016, revenues include $2.9 million, of favorable adjustments to provisionally priced copper concentrate. These provisional pricing adjustments contributed US$0.07 per pound to the average realized copper price for the quarter,

The molybdenum circuit was restarted in September 2016 and the Company recognized molybdenum revenue of $5.2 million during the fourth quarter of 2016.

Cost of sales                  
    Three months ended  
    December 31,  
(Cdn$ in thousands)   2016     2015     Change  
Site operating costs   50,235     51,183     (948 )
Transportation costs   5,358     3,858     1,500  
Changes in inventories of finished goods and ore stockpiles   (7,582 )   4,216     (11,798 )
Production costs   48,011     59,257     (11,246 )
Depletion and amortization   9,224     12,829     (3,605 )
Cost of sales   57,235     72,086     (14,851 )
Site operating costs per ton milled* $ 9.13   $ 9.41   $ (0.28 )

*Non-GAAP performance measure. See page 29 on this MD&A

Site operating costs in the three months ended December 31, 2016, decreased by 2% from the same period in 2015, due to cost control initiatives which were implemented during 2015.

21



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
 

During the three month period ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded a $4.3 million reversal of a write-down of stockpile inventory that was recorded earlier in 2016. This reversal was necessary to reflect the increase in net realizable value of the ore stockpile inventory due to increasing copper prices. The adjustment was recorded in cost of sales as a change in inventory of ore stockpile.

Depletion and amortization in the three months ended December 31, 2016 decreased from the same period in 2015, primarily due to the amounts allocated to the ore stockpile cost, partially offset by increased amortization of capitalized stripping costs.

Other operating (income) expenses                  
    Three months ended  
    December 31,  
(Cdn$ in thousands)   2016     2015     Change  
General and administrative   2,101     3,098     (997 )
Share-based compensation   1,377     339     1,038  
Exploration and evaluation   359     236     123  
Realized (gain) loss on derivative instruments   970     (1,930 )   2,900  
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments   3,363     954     2,409  
Other income   (404 )   (489 )   85  
    7,766     2,208     5,558  

General and administrative costs have decreased for the three months ended December 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015, primarily due to the Company’s cost reduction initiatives.

Share-based compensation increased for the fourth quarter of 2016 compared to the fourth quarter of 2015, primarily due to the valuation of deferred share units and performance share units which reflects an increase in the Company’s share price.

Exploration and evaluation costs for the three months ended December 31, 2016, represent costs associated with the New Prosperity and Aley projects.

During the three months ended December 31, 2016, the Company recognized a realized loss of $1.0 million from copper put options. The realized gain of $1.9 million in the three months ended December 31, 2015, is comprised of cash proceeds on the settlement and contracts that expired during the period, net of the purchase cost related to the options.

Finance income and expenses

Finance expenses for the fourth quarter of 2016 increased by $1.6 million over the fourth quarter of 2015. The increase relates to interest expense and amortization of finance costs on the new senior secured credit facility, offset by lower interest expense on capital leases and equipment loans.

Finance income is primarily comprised of income earned on the reclamation deposits.

22



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
 

Income tax

    Three months ended December 31,  
(Cdn$ in thousands)   2016     2015     Change  
Current income tax expense (recovery)   836     (75 )   911  
Deferred income tax expense (recovery)   8,025     (5,029 )   13,054  
    8,861     (5,104 )   13,965  
Effective tax rate   63.4%     17.9%     45.5%  
Canadian statutory rate   26%     26%     -  
B.C. Mineral tax rate   9.6%     9.6%     -  

The income tax expense for the fourth quarter of 2016 moved to an expense position from a recovery position in the same quarter in 2015 due in part to a positive quarter and higher copper prices. The current tax expense was due to the BC mineral taxes payable estimate. For deferred income tax, the expense was driven by a reversal of temporary differences as tax pools were applied against taxable income in the quarter, including deductions taken for tax purposes on property, plant and equipment in excess of those taken for accounting purposes.

Liquidity, cash flow and capital resources

Cash flow provided by operations during the fourth quarter of 2016 was $49.7 million compared to $1.9 million cash flow provided in the fourth quarter of 2015. Operating cash flows in the fourth quarter of 2016 reflects the increase in earnings before depletion and amortization, driven by increase in copper prices, copper production and molybdenum concentrate revenue.

Cash used for investing activities during the fourth quarter of 2016 was $9.3 million compared to $3.9 million used in the fourth quarter of 2015. Investing activities in the fourth quarter of 2016 included $6.3 million for capitalized stripping costs, $0.1 million incurred on other capital expenditures for Gibraltar, $2.0 million in development costs for the Florence and Aley projects.

Cash used for financing activities during the fourth quarter of 2016 was $15.3 million, which includes interest paid of $10.8 million and payments for capital leases and equipment loans totaling $4.5 million.

23



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
 

SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS

          2016                 2015        
(Cdn$ in thousands,   Q4     Q3     Q2     Q1     Q4     Q3     Q2     Q1  
except per share amounts)                                                
Revenues   94,628     55,964     55,090     58,183     61,412     80,067     92,754     55,065  
Net earnings (loss)   5,113     (15,610 )   (19,384 )   (1,515 )   (23,441 )   (17,722 )   4,017     (25,206 )
   Basic EPS   0.02     (0.07 )   (0.09 )   (0.01 )   (0.10 )   (0.08 )   0.02     (0.12 )
Adjusted net earnings (loss) *   16,404     (10,423 )   (19,758 )   (18,083 )   (13,112 )   (1,586 )   1,601     (2,434 )
   Adjusted basic EPS *   0.07     (0.05 )   (0.09 )   (0.08 )   (0.06 )   (0.01 )   0.01     (0.01 )
EBITDA *   32,312     4,064     (7,858 )   11,002     (9,162 )   3,395     25,959     (11,996 )
Adjusted EBITDA *   44,477     9,285     (7,642 )   (4,492 )   1,415     19,514     23,402     11,224  
                                                 
(US$ per pound, except where indicated)                                                
Realized copper price *   2.54     2.15     2.13     2.12     2.01     2.26     2.66     2.57  
Total operating costs *   1.48     1.89     2.07     2.11     1.85     1.76     1.97     2.39  
Copper sales (million pounds)   30.3     22.4     22.8     22.9     25.0     30.4     30.6     19.1  

*Non-GAAP performance measure. See page 29 of this MD&A

Financial results for the last eight quarters include the impact of volatile copper prices and foreign exchange rates that impact realized sale prices, and variability in the quarterly sales volumes due to timing of shipments which impacts revenue recognition.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The Company's significant accounting policies are presented in Note 2.5 of the 2016 annual consolidated financial statements. The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates. Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimates are revised and in any future periods affected.

In the process of applying the Company’s accounting policies, significant areas where judgment is required include the determination of a joint arrangement and recovery of other deferred tax assets.

The measurement of impairment charges represents a significant area of estimation in the financial statements. As part of the annual impairment test, the estimated future cash flows from the Gibraltar mine were discounted to an after-tax net present value of $1,127 million (100% basis) as of December 31, 2016 which is in excess of the Company’s carrying value. This net present value was determined with the following key assumptions: a long-term C$/US$ exchange rate of 1.25, an after-tax discount rate of 8.6%, and estimated future copper prices which ranged from US$2.49 to US$3.00 over the next 5 years and US$3.00 long-term. A 5% increase in the Canadian dollar equivalent long-term copper price results in an after-tax net present value of $1,241 million. A 5% decrease in the Canadian dollar equivalent long-term copper price results in an after-tax net present value of $1,013 million.

Other significant areas of estimation include reserve and resource estimation and asset valuations; ore stock piles and finished inventory quantities; plant and equipment lives; tax provisions; provisions for environmental rehabilitation; valuation of financial instruments and derivatives; deferred stripping costs and share-based compensation. Key estimates and assumptions made by management with respect to these areas have been disclosed in the notes to these consolidated financial statements as appropriate.

24



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
 

The accuracy of reserve and resource estimates is a function of the quantity and quality of available data and the assumptions made and judgment used in the engineering and geological interpretation, and may be subject to revision based on various factors. Changes in reserve and resource estimates may impact the carrying value of property, plant and equipment; the calculation of depreciation expense; the capitalization of stripping costs incurred during production; and the timing of cash flows related to the provision for environmental rehabilitation.

Changes in forecast prices of commodities, exchange rates, production costs and recovery rates may change the economic status of reserves and resources. Forecast prices of commodities, exchange rates, production costs and recovery rates, and discount rates assumptions, either individually or collectively, may impact the carrying value of derivative financial instruments, inventories, property, plant and equipment, and intangibles, as well as the measurement of impairment charges or reversals.

CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING POLICIES

In May 2014, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 16, Property, Plant and Equipment and IAS 38, Intangibles. These amendments prohibit the use of revenue-based depreciation methods for property, plant and equipment and limit the use of revenue-based amortization for intangible assets. These amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2016, and are to be applied prospectively. These amendments did not have an impact the Company’s financial statements as revenue-based depreciation or amortization methods are not used.

As at December 31, 2016, the Company reclassified certain cash amounts from current to non-current classification to reflect the restricted nature of the cash. The December 31, 2015, amounts have also been reclassified from current to non-current for comparative purposes.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company changed its accounting policy in respect of allocating reductions in its tax pools for British Columbia Mineral Tax purposes. This change has been applied retrospectively and has resulted in the previously presented Other assets of $15,985 now being presented as a reduction to Deferred income taxes as at December 31, 2015. Management believes the new method provides reliable information and provides for a more relevant representation of the financial condition of the Company which reflects the way the tax pools will be realized.

INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Company's management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures.

The Company’s internal control system over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance to management and the Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

(1)

pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;

   
(2)

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and

25



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
 

(3)

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

The Company’s internal control system over disclosure controls and procedures is designed to provide reasonable assurance that material information relating to the Company is made known to management and disclosed to others and information required to be disclosed by the Company in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted by us under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the securities legislation.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial reporting and disclosure.

There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures during the 2016 financial year that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting and disclosure.

The Company’s management, under the supervision of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth in the Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this assessment, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2016, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company uses a mixture of cash, long-term debt and shareholders’ equity to maintain an efficient capital allocation and ensure adequate liquidity exists to meet the ongoing cash requirements of the business. In the normal course of business, the Company is inherently exposed to financial risks, including market risk, commodity price risk, interest rate risk, currency risk, liquidity risk and credit risk. The Company manages these risks in accordance with its risk management policies. To mitigate some of these inherent business risks, the Company uses commodity derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment. These non-hedge derivatives are summarized in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements. The financial risks and the Company’s exposure to these risks, is provided in various tables in Note 24 of the consolidated financial statements. For a discussion on the methods used to value financial instruments, as well as significant assumptions, refer also to Notes 2 and 24 of the consolidated financial statements.

Summary of Financial Instruments Carrying Amount Associated Risks
Financial assets    
Loans and receivables    
    Interest rate
 Cash and equivalents 89,030 Credit
    Credit
 Accounts receivable 12,905 Market
Available-for-sale    
 Shares 1,419 Market
 Subscription receipts 10,333 Market
 Reclamation deposits 30,535 Market

26



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
 

Fair value through profit and loss (FVTPL)    
    Liquidity
    Market
 Copper put option contracts 155 Credit
Financial liabilities    
    Currency
 Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 33,416 Interest rate
 Senior notes 266,435 Currency
 Senior secured credit facility 91,483 Currency
 Capital leases 19,976 Interest rate
    Currency
 Secured equipment loans 11,396 Interest rate

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Key management personnel

Key management personnel include the members of the Board of Directors and executive officers of the Company.

The Company contributes to a post-employment defined contribution pension plan on the behalf of certain key management personnel. This retirement compensation arrangement (“RCA Trust”) was established to provide benefits to certain executive officers on or after retirement in recognition of their long service. Upon retirement, the participant is entitled to the distribution of the accumulated value of the contributions under the RCA Trust. Obligations for contributions to the defined contribution pension plan are recognized as compensation expense in the periods during which services are rendered by the executive officers.

Certain executive officers are entitled to termination and change in control benefits. In the event of termination without cause, other than a change in control, these executive officers are entitled to an amount ranging from 9-months’ to 18-months’ salary. In the event of a change in control, if a termination without cause or a resignation occurs within 12 months following the change of control, these executive officers are entitled to receive, among other things, an amount ranging from 24-months’ to 32-months’ salary and accrued bonus, and all stock options held by these individuals will fully vest.

Executive officers and directors also participate in the Company’s share option program (refer to Note 21 of the consolidated financial statements).

Compensation for key management personnel (includes all members of the Board of Directors and executive officers) is as follows:

    Year ended December 31,  
(Cdn$ in thousands, except per share amounts)   2016     2015  
Salaries and benefits   5,050     4,744  
Post-employment benefits   1,309     1,400  
Share-based compensation   3,602     1,558  
    9,961     7,702  

27



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
 

Other related parties

Three directors of the Company are also principals of Hunter Dickinson Services Inc. (“HDSI”), a private company. HDSI invoices the Company for their executive services (director fees) and for other services provided by HDSI. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company incurred total costs of $1,440 (2015: $2,407) in transactions with HDSI. Of these, $643 (2015: $854) related to administrative, legal, exploration and tax services, $517 related to reimbursements of office rent costs (2015: $490), and $280 (2015: $280) related to director fees for two Taseko directors who are also principals of HDSI. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company also incurred costs of $783 through HDSI related to compensation of Taseko’s CEO who is also a principal of HDSI.

Under the terms of the joint venture operating agreement, the Gibraltar Joint Venture pays the Company a management fee for services rendered by the Company as operator of the Gibraltar Mine. In addition, the Company pays certain expenses on behalf of the Gibraltar Joint Venture and invoices the Joint Venture for these expenses.

28



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
 

NON-GAAP PERFORMANCE MEASURES

This document includes certain non-GAAP performance measures that do not have a standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS. These measures may differ from those used by, and may not be comparable to such measures as reported by, other issuers. The Company believes that these measures are commonly used by certain investors, in conjunction with conventional IFRS measures, to enhance their understanding of the Company’s performance. These measures have been derived from the Company’s financial statements and applied on a consistent basis. The following tables below provide a reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable IFRS measure.

Total operating costs and site operating costs, net of by-product credits

Total costs of sales include all costs absorbed into inventory, as well as transportation costs. Site operating costs is calculated by removing net changes in inventory and depletion and amortization and transportation costs from cost of sales. Site operating costs, net of by-product credits is calculated by removing by-product credits from the site operating costs. Site operating costs, net of by-product credits per pound are calculated by dividing the aggregate of the applicable costs by copper pounds produced. Total operating costs per pound is the sum of site operating costs, net of by-product credits and off-property costs divided by the copper pounds produced. Byproduct credits are calculated based on actual sales of molybdenum (net of treatment costs) and silver during the period divided by the total pounds of copper produced during the period. These measures are calculated on a consistent basis for the periods presented.

    Three months ended           Year ended  
    December 31,     December 31,  
(Cdn$ in thousands, unless otherwise indicated) – 75% basis   2016     2015     2016     2015  
Cost of sales   57,235     72,086     262,089     287,978  
Less:                        
 Depletion and amortization   (9,224 )   (12,829 )   (52,939 )   (49,514 )
 Net change in inventory   7,582     (4,216 )   16,738     3,971  
 Transportation costs   (5,358 )   (3,858 )   (16,507 )   (17,129 )
Site operating costs   50,235     51,183     209,381     225,306  
Less by-product credits:                        
 Molybdenum   (3,689 )   78     (4,400 )   (5,036 )
 Silver   (1,018 )   (1,046 )   (3,988 )   (3,795 )
Site operating costs, net of by-product credits   45,528     50,215     200,993     216,475  
Total copper produced (thousand pounds)   30,512     24,824     99,938     106,664  
Total costs per pound produced   1.49     2.02     2.01     2.03  
Average exchange rate for the period (CAD/USD)   1.33     1.34     1.32     1.28  
Site operating costs, net of by-product credits (US$ per pound)   1.12     1.52     1.52     1.59  
Site operating costs, net of by-product credits   45,528     50,215     200,993     216,475  
Add off-property costs:                        
 Treatment and refining costs   9,454     6,935     27,924     33,634  
 Transportation costs   5,358     3,858     16,507     17,129  
Total operating costs   60,340     61,008     245,424     267,238  
Total operating costs (C1) (US$ per pound)   1.48     1.85     1.85     1.96  

29



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
 

Adjusted net earnings (loss)

Adjusted net earnings (loss) remove the effect of the following transactions from net earnings as reported under IFRS:

Management believes these transactions do not reflect the underlying operating performance of our core mining business and are not necessarily indicative of future operating results. Furthermore, unrealized gains/losses on derivative instruments, changes in the fair value of financial instruments, and unrealized foreign currency gains/losses are not necessarily reflective of the underlying operating results for the reporting periods presented.

                         
    Three months ended     Year ended  
    December 31,     December 31,  
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)   2016     2015     2016     2015  
Net income (loss)   5,113     (23,441 )   (31,396 )   (62,352 )
 Unrealized (gain) loss on derivatives   3,363     954     4,404     3,131  
 Unrealized foreign exchange (gain) loss   8,802     9,623     (7,785 )   43,809  
 Write-down of marketable securities   -     -     -     419  
 Other non-recurring expenses*   -     -     5,489     -  
 Estimated tax effect of adjustments   (874 )   (248 )   (2,572 )   (538 )
Adjusted net income (loss)   16,404     (13,112 )   (31,860 )   (15,531 )
Adjusted EPS   0.07     (0.06 )   (0.14 )   (0.08 )

* Other non-recurring expenses includes legal and other advisory costs associated with the special shareholder meeting, the proxy contest and related litigation, and other non-recurring financing costs.

EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA

EBITDA represents net earnings before interest, income taxes, and depreciation. EBITDA is presented because it is an important supplemental measure of our performance and is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of companies in the industry, many of which present EBITDA when reporting their results. Issuers of “high yield” securities also present EBITDA because investors, analysts and rating agencies consider it useful in measuring the ability of those issuers to meet debt service obligations. The Company believes EBITDA is an appropriate supplemental measure of debt service capacity, because cash expenditures on interest are, by definition, available to pay interest, and tax expense is inversely correlated to interest expense because tax expense goes down as deductible interest expense goes up; depreciation is a non-cash charge.

Adjusted EBITDA is presented as a further supplemental measure of the Company’s performance and ability to service debt. Adjusted EBITDA is prepared by adjusting EBITDA to eliminate the impact of a number of items that are not considered indicative of ongoing operating performance.

Adjusted EBITDA is calculated by adding to EBITDA certain items of expense and deducting from EBITDA certain items of income that are not likely to recur or are not indicative of the Company’s future operating performance consisting of:

30



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
 

While some of the adjustments are recurring, other non-recurring expenses do not reflect the underlying performance of the Company’s core mining business and are not necessarily indicative of future results. Furthermore, unrealized gains/losses on derivative instruments, foreign currency translation gains/losses and changes in the fair value of financial instruments are not necessarily reflective of the underlying operating results for the reporting periods presented.

    Three months ended           Year ended  
          December 31,           December 31,  
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)   2016     2015     2016     2015  
Net income (loss)   5,113     (23,441 )   (31,396 )   (62,352 )
Add:                        
 Depletion and amortization   9,225     12,848     53,024     49,599  
 Share-based compensation expense   1,382     359     3,682     2,002  
 Finance expense   8,028     6,433     30,007     25,923  
 Finance income   (297 )   (257 )   (1,084 )   (1,371 )
 Income tax expense (recovery)   8,861     (5,104 )   (14,713 )   (5,605 )
EBITDA   32,312     (9,162 )   39,520     8,196  
Adjustments:                        
 Unrealized loss on derivative instruments   3,363     954     4,404     3,131  
 Unrealized foreign exchange (gain) loss   8,802     9,623     (7,785 )   43,809  
 Write-down of marketable securities   -     -     -     419  
 Other non-recurring expenses*   -     -     5,489     -  
Adjusted EBITDA   44,477     1,415     41,628     55,555  

* Other non-recurring expenses includes legal and other advisory costs associated with the special shareholder meeting, the proxy contest and related litigation, and other non-recurring financing costs.

31



TASEKO MINES LIMITED
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
 

Earnings from mining operations before depletion and amortization

Earnings from mining operations before depletion and amortization is earnings from mining operations with depletion and amortization added back. The Company discloses this measure, which has been derived from our financial statements and applied on a consistent basis, to provide assistance in understanding the results of the Company’s operations and financial position and it is meant to provide further information about the financial results to investors.

    Three months ended           Year ended  
    December 31,     December 31,  
(Cdn$ in thousands, except per share amounts)   2016     2015     2016     2015  
Earnings (loss) from mining operations   37,393     (10,674 )   1,776     1,320  
Add:                        
 Depletion and amortization   9,224     12,829     52,939     49,514  
Earnings from mining operations before depletion and                        
amortization   46,617     2,155     54,715     50,834  

Site operating costs per ton milled

    Three months ended           Year ended  
    December 31,     December 31,  
(Cdn$ in thousands, except per share amounts)   2016     2015     2016     2015  
Site operating costs (included in cost of sales)   50,235     51,183     209,381     225,306  
                         
Tons milled (millions) (75% basis)   5.50     5.44     22.11     22.91  
Site operating costs per ton milled $ 9.13   $ 9.41   $ 9.47   $ 9.83  

32



 
     
  KPMG LLP Telephone  (604) 691-3000
  Chartered Professional Accountants Fax (604) 691-3031
  PO Box 10426 777 Dunsmuir Street Internet www.kpmg.ca
  Vancouver BC V7Y 1K3    
  Canada    

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
Taseko Mines Limited

We consent to the use of our reports, each dated February 21, 2017, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in this annual report on Form 40-F.

//s// KPMG LLP

Chartered Professional Accountants

March 15, 2017
Vancouver, Canada

KPMG LLP is a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG
network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative
(“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity.
KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP.




March 15, 2017

VIA EDGAR

To: United States Securities and Exchange Commission
   
Re: Taseko Mines Limited (the " Company ")
  Annual Report on Form 40-F
  Consent of Expert
   

This consent is provided in connection with the Company's annual report on Form 40-F report for the year ended December 31, 2016 to be filed by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and any amendments thereto (the “ Annual Report ”). The Annual Report incorporates by reference, among other things, the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “ AIF ”).

I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with reference to my involvement in the preparation of the following technical reports (the " Technical Reports "):

and to references to the Technical Reports, or portions thereof, in the Annual Report and the AIF and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of the information derived from the Technical Reports in the Annual Report and the AIF.

Yours truly,

/s/ S. Jones

_____________________________________
Scott Jones, P.Eng., Vice President, Engineering

1



Ronald G. Simpson, P.Geo.
GeoSim Services Inc.
807 Geddes Road
Roberts Creek, B.C. Canada, V0N 2W6
Telephone: 604 733-7970
Email: rsimpson@geosimservices.com

March 15, 2017

VIA EDGAR

To: United States Securities and Exchange Commission
   
Re: Taseko Mines Limited (the " Company ")
  Annual Report on Form 40-F
  Consent of Expert
   

This consent is provided in connection with the Company's annual report on Form 40-F report for the year ended December 31, 2016 to be filed by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and any amendments thereto (the “ Annual Report ”). The Annual Report incorporates by reference, among other things, the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “ AIF ”).

I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with reference to my involvement in the preparation of the following technical reports (the " Technical Reports "):

and to references to the Technical Reports, or portions thereof, in the Annual Report and the AIF and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of the information derived from the Technical Reports in the Annual Report and the AIF.

Yours truly,

/s/ R. G. Simpson  
Ronald G. Simpson, P.Geo.  




March 15, 2017

VIA EDGAR

To: United States Securities and Exchange Commission
   
Re: Taseko Mines Limited (the " Company ")
  Annual Report on Form 40-F
  Consent of Expert
   

This consent is provided in connection with the Company's annual report on Form 40-F report for the year ended December 31, 2016 to be filed by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and any amendments thereto (the “ Annual Report ”). The Annual Report incorporates by reference, among other things, the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “ AIF ”).

I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with reference to my involvement in the preparation of the following technical report (the " Technical Report "):

and to references to the Technical Report, or portions thereof, in the Annual Report and the AIF and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of the information derived from the Technical Report in the Annual Report and the AIF.

Yours truly,

/s/ K. Merriam

_____________________________________
Keith Merriam, P.Eng., Manager, Process Engineering

1




March 15, 2017

VIA EDGAR

To: United States Securities and Exchange Commission
   
Re: Taseko Mines Limited (the " Company ")
  Annual Report on Form 40-F
  Consent of Expert
   

This consent is provided in connection with the Company's annual report on Form 40-F report for the year ended December 31, 2016 to be filed by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and any amendments thereto (the “ Annual Report ”). The Annual Report incorporates by reference, among other things, the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “ AIF ”).

I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with reference to my involvement in the preparation of the following technical report (the " Technical Report "):

and to references to the Technical Report, or portions thereof, in the Annual Report and the AIF and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of the information derived from the Technical Report in the Annual Report and the AIF.

Yours truly,

/s/ R. Rotzinger

____________________________________
Robert Rotzinger, P.Eng., Vice President, Capital Projects

1



Greg Yelland, P.Eng.
Yelland Engineering Services
6803 Hycroft Rd., West Vancouver, B.C. Canada, V7W 2K7
Telephone: 604-926-1677
Email: gjyelland@gmail.com

March 15, 2017

VIA EDGAR

To: United States Securities and Exchange Commission
   
Re: Taseko Mines Limited (the " Company ")
  Annual Report on Form 40-F
  Consent of Expert
   

This consent is provided in connection with the Company's annual report on Form 40-F report for the year ended December 31, 2016 to be filed by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and any amendments thereto (the “ Annual Report ”). The Annual Report incorporates by reference, among other things, the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “ AIF ”).

I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with reference to my involvement in the preparation of the following technical report (the " Technical Report "):

and to references to the Technical Report, or portions thereof, in the Annual Report and the AIF and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of the information derived from the Technical Report in the Annual Report and the AIF.

Yours truly,

/s/ G. Yelland

_________________________________________
Greg Yelland, P.Eng.

1



March 15, 2017

VIA EDGAR

To: United States Securities and Exchange Commission
   
Re: Taseko Mines Limited (the " Company ")
  Annual Report on Form 40-F
  Consent of Expert
   

This consent is provided in connection with the Company's annual report on Form 40-F report for the year ended December 31, 2016 to be filed by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and any amendments thereto (the “ Annual Report ”). The Annual Report incorporates by reference, among other things, the Company’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “ AIF ”).

I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with reference to my involvement in the preparation of the following technical reports (the " Technical Reports "):

and to references to the Technical Report, or portions thereof, in the Annual Report and the AIF and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of the information derived from the Technical Report in the Annual Report and the AIF.

Yours truly,

/s/ Dan Johnson

___________________________________________
Dan Johnson, P.E., RM-SME

1