false 0001472619 FY false 0001472619 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 2021-12-31 0001472619 dei:BusinessContactMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 2020-12-31 0001472619 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0001472619 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0001472619 2018-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember 2018-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:CapitalReserveMember 2018-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember 2018-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:CapitalReserveMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0001472619 2019-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:CapitalReserveMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:CapitalReserveMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:CapitalReserveMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:CapitalReserveMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:CapitalReserveMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:NavarroResourcesSarlMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:AdumbiMiningSaMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:KglIsiroAtlanticLtdMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:IsiroJerseyLimitedMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:KglIsiroSarlMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:DevonResourcesSarlMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:FixturesAndFittingsMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:OfficeEquipmentMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:VehiclesMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:CommunicationAndNetworkEquipmentMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:RightofuseAssetsMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:LeaseholdImprovementsMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:BuildingsMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:DevonResourcesSarlMember 2018-06-30 0001472619 ln:DevonResourcesSarlMember 2018-06-01 2018-06-30 0001472619 ln:NavarroResourcesSarlMember 2018-06-30 0001472619 ln:NavarroResourcesSarlMember 2018-06-01 2018-06-30 0001472619 ln:KiloGoldminesLtdMember 2019-09-01 2019-09-27 0001472619 ln:AdumbiMiningSarlMember 2019-09-27 0001472619 ln:KglIsiroPropertiesMember 2019-09-27 0001472619 ln:KiloIncMember 2019-09-27 0001472619 ln:AdumbiMiningSarlMember 2019-09-01 2019-09-27 0001472619 ln:AdumbiMiningSarlMember 2020-01-01 2020-03-31 0001472619 ln:AdumbiMiningSarlMember 2020-03-31 0001472619 ln:AdumbiMiningSarlMember 2020-09-01 2020-09-30 0001472619 ln:NewCongoMiningCodeMember 2020-09-01 2020-09-30 0001472619 ln:LoncorResourcesCongoSarlMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:LoncorKiloIncMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:KiloGoldminesLtdMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:KiloGoldminesLtdMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:KiloGoldminesLtdMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ln:ArnoldKondratMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:ArnoldKondratMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ln:ArnoldKondratMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:ArnoldKondratMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0001472619 ln:GentorResourcesIncMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:GentorResourcesIncMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ln:KglResourcesLtdMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:KglResourcesLtdMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ln:ArnoldKondratMember 2019-01-01 2019-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember ifrs-full:FixturesAndFittingsMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember ifrs-full:OfficeEquipmentMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember ifrs-full:LandAndBuildingsMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember ifrs-full:MotorVehiclesMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember ifrs-full:OtherPropertyPlantAndEquipmentMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember ifrs-full:RightofuseAssetsMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember ifrs-full:LeaseholdImprovementsMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember ifrs-full:LeaseholdImprovementsMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember ifrs-full:RightofuseAssetsMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember ifrs-full:OtherPropertyPlantAndEquipmentMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember ifrs-full:LandAndBuildingsMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember ifrs-full:MotorVehiclesMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember ifrs-full:OfficeEquipmentMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember ifrs-full:FixturesAndFittingsMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember ifrs-full:LeaseholdImprovementsMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember ifrs-full:RightofuseAssetsMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember ifrs-full:OtherPropertyPlantAndEquipmentMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember ifrs-full:LandAndBuildingsMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember ifrs-full:MotorVehiclesMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember ifrs-full:OfficeEquipmentMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember ifrs-full:FixturesAndFittingsMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember ifrs-full:LeaseholdImprovementsMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember ifrs-full:RightofuseAssetsMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember ifrs-full:OtherPropertyPlantAndEquipmentMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember ifrs-full:LandAndBuildingsMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember ifrs-full:MotorVehiclesMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember ifrs-full:OfficeEquipmentMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember ifrs-full:FixturesAndFittingsMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember ifrs-full:FixturesAndFittingsMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember ifrs-full:OfficeEquipmentMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember ifrs-full:MotorVehiclesMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember ifrs-full:LandAndBuildingsMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember ifrs-full:OtherPropertyPlantAndEquipmentMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember ifrs-full:RightofuseAssetsMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember ifrs-full:LeaseholdImprovementsMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AtCostMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember ifrs-full:FixturesAndFittingsMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember ifrs-full:OfficeEquipmentMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember ifrs-full:MotorVehiclesMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember ifrs-full:LandAndBuildingsMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember ifrs-full:OtherPropertyPlantAndEquipmentMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember ifrs-full:RightofuseAssetsMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember ifrs-full:LeaseholdImprovementsMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember ifrs-full:FixturesAndFittingsMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember ifrs-full:OfficeEquipmentMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember ifrs-full:MotorVehiclesMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember ifrs-full:LandAndBuildingsMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember ifrs-full:OtherPropertyPlantAndEquipmentMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember ifrs-full:RightofuseAssetsMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember ifrs-full:LeaseholdImprovementsMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember ifrs-full:FixturesAndFittingsMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember ifrs-full:OfficeEquipmentMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember ifrs-full:MotorVehiclesMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember ifrs-full:LandAndBuildingsMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember ifrs-full:OtherPropertyPlantAndEquipmentMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember ifrs-full:RightofuseAssetsMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember ifrs-full:LeaseholdImprovementsMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember ifrs-full:FixturesAndFittingsMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember ifrs-full:OfficeEquipmentMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember ifrs-full:MotorVehiclesMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember ifrs-full:LandAndBuildingsMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember ifrs-full:OtherPropertyPlantAndEquipmentMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember ifrs-full:RightofuseAssetsMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember ifrs-full:LeaseholdImprovementsMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember ifrs-full:FixturesAndFittingsMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember ifrs-full:OfficeEquipmentMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember ifrs-full:MotorVehiclesMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember ifrs-full:LandAndBuildingsMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember ifrs-full:OtherPropertyPlantAndEquipmentMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember ifrs-full:RightofuseAssetsMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember ifrs-full:LeaseholdImprovementsMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:AccumulatedDepreciationAndAmortisationMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:FixturesAndFittingsMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:OfficeEquipmentMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:MotorVehiclesMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:LandAndBuildingsMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:OtherPropertyPlantAndEquipmentMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:RightofuseAssetsMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:LeaseholdImprovementsMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:FixturesAndFittingsMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:OfficeEquipmentMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:MotorVehiclesMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:LandAndBuildingsMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:OtherPropertyPlantAndEquipmentMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:RightofuseAssetsMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:LeaseholdImprovementsMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:FixturesAndFittingsMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:OfficeEquipmentMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:MotorVehiclesMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:LandAndBuildingsMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:OtherPropertyPlantAndEquipmentMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:RightofuseAssetsMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:LeaseholdImprovementsMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:NgayuMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:DevonMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:NavarroMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:NgayuMember 2015-01-01 2015-12-31 0001472619 ln:AdumbiMiningSarlMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:GovernmentOfCongoMember ln:AdumbiMiningSarlMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:KglIsiroAtlanticLtdMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:IsiroJerseyLimitedMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:ImboMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ln:NgayuMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ln:NorthKivuMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ln:ImboMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0001472619 ln:NgayuMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0001472619 ln:NorthKivuMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0001472619 ln:ImboMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ln:NgayuMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ln:NorthKivuMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ln:ImboMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:NgayuMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:NorthKivuMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:ImboMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:NorthKivuMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:KglIsiroSarlMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 country:CG 2021-12-31 0001472619 country:CA 2021-12-31 0001472619 country:CG 2020-12-31 0001472619 country:CA 2020-12-31 0001472619 2018-06-30 0001472619 2020-05-31 0001472619 2020-05-01 2020-05-31 0001472619 ln:ConsultingServicesRenderedByThirdPartyMember 2019-09-01 2019-09-30 0001472619 ln:ConsultingServicesRenderedByThirdPartyMember 2019-10-01 2019-10-31 0001472619 ln:ConsultingServicesRenderedByThirdPartyMember 2019-12-01 2019-12-31 0001472619 ln:SubsequentEventsMember ln:NonBrokeredPrivatePlacementMember 2022-01-01 2022-02-28 0001472619 2021-06-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:PrivatePlacementsMember 2020-02-01 2020-02-29 0001472619 ln:CertainInsidersMember ln:PrivatePlacementsMember 2020-02-01 2020-02-29 0001472619 ln:ArnoldKondratMember ln:PrivatePlacementsMember 2020-02-01 2020-02-29 0001472619 ln:ConsultingServicesRenderedByThirdPartyMember 2020-02-01 2020-02-29 0001472619 2020-02-01 2020-02-29 0001472619 2020-02-29 0001472619 ln:ConsultingServicesRenderedByThirdPartyMember 2020-06-01 2020-06-30 0001472619 ln:PrivatePlacementsMember 2020-07-01 2020-08-31 0001472619 ln:CertainInsidersMember ln:PrivatePlacementsMember 2020-07-01 2020-08-31 0001472619 ln:ConsultingServicesRenderedByThirdPartyMember 2020-09-01 2020-09-30 0001472619 ln:ExpireJulyThreeOneTwoZeroTwoTwoMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ln:ExpireAugustTwoSixTwoZeroTwoTwoMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ln:ExpireJulyThreeOneTwoZeroTwoTwoMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember ln:FebruaryTwoTwoZeroTwoZeroMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember ln:SeptemberOneSevenTwoZeroOneNineMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember ln:OctoberThreeOneTwoZeroOneNineMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember ln:DecemberNineTwoZeroOneNineMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember ln:DecemberTwoSevenTwoZeroOneNineMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember ln:FebruaryThreeTwoZeroTwoZeroMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember ln:FebruarySixTwoZeroTwoZeroMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember ln:FebruaryTwoFiveTwoZeroTwoZeroMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember ln:AugustThreeOneTwoZeroTwoZeroMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember ln:FebruaryTwoEightTwoZeroTwoZeroMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember ln:JuneThreeZeroTwoZeroTwoZeroMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember ln:JulyThreeOneTwoZeroTwoZeroMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember ln:AugustTwoSevenTwoZeroTwoZeroMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember ln:SeptemberNineSevenTwoZeroTwoZeroMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ln:ExpireFebruaryThreeTwoZerTwoTwoMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:BottomOfRangeMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:TopOfRangeMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember ln:FebruaryTwoTwoZeroTwoOneMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember ln:FebruaryThreeTwoZeroTwoOneMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember ln:FebruaryOneTwoTwoZeroTwoOneMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember ln:MarchEightTwoZeroTwoOneMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember ln:JuneTwoOneTwoZeroTwoOneMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember ln:JulyOneNineTwoZeroTwoOneMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember ln:JulyTwentyTwoTwoZeroTwoOneMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember ln:JulyTwentyThreeTwoZeroTwoOneMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember ln:OctoberFourTwoZeroTwoOneMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember ln:DecemberOneTwoZeroTwoOneMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember ln:DecemberTwentyOneTwoZeroTwoOneMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:ExpireFebruaryTwoTwoZeroTwoTwoMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ln:ExpireFebruaryThreeTwoZerTwoTwoMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ln:ExpireFebruaryOneTwoTwoZeroTwoTwoMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ln:ExpireJulyOneNineTwoZeroTwoTwoMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ln:ExpireJulyTwentyTwoTwoZeroTwoTwoMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ln:ExpireJulyTwentyThreeTwoZeroTwoTwoMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ln:ExpireJulyThreeOneTwoZeroTwoTwoMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:ExpireAugustTwoSixTwoZeroTwoTwoMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:ExpireFebruaryTwoTwoZeroTwoTwoMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:ExpireFebruaryOneTwoTwoZeroTwoTwoMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:ExpireJulyOneNineTwoZeroTwoTwoMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:ExpireJulyTwentyTwoTwoZeroTwoTwoMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:ExpireJulyTwentyThreeTwoZeroTwoTwoMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:ExpireAugustTwoSixTwoZeroTwoTwoMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:ExpireFebruaryTwoTwoZeroTwoTwoMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:ExpireFebruaryThreeTwoZerTwoTwoMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:ExpireFebruaryOneTwoTwoZeroTwoTwoMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:ExpireJulyOneNineTwoZeroTwoTwoMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:ExpireJulyTwentyTwoTwoZeroTwoTwoMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:ExpireJulyTwentyThreeTwoZeroTwoTwoMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:PrivatePlacementsMember 2021-02-01 2021-02-28 0001472619 2021-03-01 2021-03-31 0001472619 2021-06-01 2021-06-30 0001472619 ln:NonBrokeredPrivatePlacementMember 2021-07-01 2021-07-31 0001472619 2021-10-01 2021-10-31 0001472619 2021-12-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:FinderWarrantsMember ln:PrivatePlacementsMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:PrivatePlacementsMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:FinderWarrantsMember ln:PrivatePlacementsMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0001472619 ln:ExercisePriceRangeOneMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:ExercisePriceRangeOneMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:ExercisePriceRangeOneMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:TopOfRangeMember ln:ExercisePriceRangeOneMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:ExercisePriceRangeOneMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0001472619 ln:ExercisePriceRangeOneMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:BottomOfRangeMember ln:ExercisePriceRangeOneMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:TopOfRangeMember ln:ExercisePriceRangeOneMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:BottomOfRangeMember ln:ExercisePriceRangeOneMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 2020-07-01 0001472619 ifrs-full:CreditRiskMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:CreditRiskMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:Level3OfFairValueHierarchyMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:Level1OfFairValueHierarchyMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:Level3OfFairValueHierarchyMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:Level1OfFairValueHierarchyMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:Level2OfFairValueHierarchyMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ifrs-full:Level2OfFairValueHierarchyMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ln:AmountsHeldInForeignCurrenciesMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ln:AmountsHeldInForeignCurrenciesMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:NoncapitalLossesCarriedForwardMember ln:TwoZeroTwoSixMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:NoncapitalLossesCarriedForwardMember ln:TwoZeroTwoSevenMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:NoncapitalLossesCarriedForwardMember ln:TwoZeroTwoEightMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:NoncapitalLossesCarriedForwardMember ln:TwoZeroTwoNineMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:NoncapitalLossesCarriedForwardMember ln:TwoZeroThreeZeroMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:NoncapitalLossesCarriedForwardMember ln:TwoZeroThreeOneMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:NoncapitalLossesCarriedForwardMember ln:TwoZeroThreeTwoMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:NoncapitalLossesCarriedForwardMember ln:TwoZeroThreeThreeMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:NoncapitalLossesCarriedForwardMember ln:TwoZeroThreeFourMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:NoncapitalLossesCarriedForwardMember ln:TwoZeroThreeFiveMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:NoncapitalLossesCarriedForwardMember ln:TwoZeroThreeSixMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:NoncapitalLossesCarriedForwardMember ln:TwoZeroThreeSevenMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:NoncapitalLossesCarriedForwardMember ln:TwoZeroThreeEightMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:NoncapitalLossesCarriedForwardMember ln:TwoZeroThreeNineMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:NoncapitalLossesCarriedForwardMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:NoncapitalLossesCarriedForwardMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ln:NoncapitalLossesCarriedForwardMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ln:FixedAssetsCanadaMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ln:FixedAssetsCanadaMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ln:OtherCanadaMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ln:OtherCanadaMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ln:CapitalLossCarryForwardsCanadaMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ln:CapitalLossCarryForwardsCanadaMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ln:LeaseCanadaMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ln:LeaseCanadaMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ln:ExplorationAndEvaluationPropertiesCongoMember 2019-12-31 0001472619 ln:ExplorationAndEvaluationPropertiesCongoMember 2020-12-31 0001472619 ln:FixedAssetsCanadaMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:OtherCanadaMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:CapitalLossCarryForwardsCanadaMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:ExplorationAndEvaluationPropertiesCongoMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:NoncapitalLossesCarriedForwardMember ln:TwoZeroFourZeroMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:LeaseCanadaMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:NoncapitalLossesCarriedForwardMember ln:TwoZeroFourOneMember 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:CanadaEmergencyWageSubsidyMember 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 0001472619 ln:CanadaEmergencyWageSubsidyMember 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 0001472619 ln:SubsequentEventsMember ln:NonBrokeredPrivatePlacementMember 2022-02-01 2022-02-28 iso4217:CAD iso4217:CAD xbrli:shares ln:CAD_per_Share ln:Month ln:Share iso4217:USD iso4217:USD xbrli:shares xbrli:pure xbrli:shares

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

___________________

 

FORM 20-F

 

[ ]  REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

OR

 

[X]   ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For fiscal year ended December 31, 2021

 

OR

 

[ ]  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 For the transition period from _______ to ______

 

OR

 

[ ]  SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

Date of event requiring this shell company report:

 

Commission file number: 001-35124

 

LONCOR GOLD INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

Ontario
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation of Organization)

 

1 First Canadian Place, 100 King Street West, Suite 7070, Toronto, Ontario, M5X 1E3, Canada
(Address of Principal Executive Offices, including Zip Code)

 

Contact: Geoffrey G. Farr; E-mail: gfarr@loncor.com; Telephone: (416) 361-2510; Address: 1
First Canadian Place, 100 King Street West, Suite 7070, Toronto, Ontario, M5X 1E3, Canada
(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile Number and Address of Company Contact Person)

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Shares

 

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.
None

 

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer's classes of capital or common stock as of December 31, 2021:
135,099,174 common shares

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes [   ]   No [X]

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes [   ]   No [X]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X]   No [   ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes [   ]     No [   ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or an emerging growth company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer [   ] Accelerated filer [   ] Non-accelerated filer               [X]
    Emerging growth company    [X]

 

If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards† provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

 

† The term “new or revised financial accounting standard” refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012.

 

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

 

U.S. GAAP [   ] International Financial Reporting Standards Other [   ]
  as issued by the International  
  Accounting Standards Board   [X]  

 

If "Other" has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow:
[   ]  Item 17     [   ]   Item 18

 

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes [   ]     No
-ii-


LONCOR GOLD INC. - FORM 20-F
TABLE OF CONTENTS

  Page 
   
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS 1

INFORMATION REGARDING MINERAL INFORMATION

2
CURRENCY 3
   
PART 1  
   
ITEM 1.  IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORS 3
   
ITEM 2.  OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE 3
   
ITEM 3.  KEY INFORMATION 3
   
A.  [Reserved] 3
   
B.  Capitalization and Indebtedness 3
   
C.  Reason for the Offer and Use of Proceeds 3
   
D.  Risk Factors 3
   
ITEM 4.  INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY 15
   
A.  History and Development of the Company 15
   
B.  Business Overview 23
   
C.  Organizational Structure 25
   
D.  Property, Plants and Equipment 26
   
ITEM 4A.  UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS 47
   
ITEM 5.  OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS 47
   
A.  Operating Results 47
   
B.  Liquidity and Capital Resources. 47
   
C.  Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc. 47
   
D.  Trend Information 47
   
ITEM 6.  DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES 48
   
A.  Directors and Senior Management 48
   
B.  Compensation 50
   
C.  Board Practices 56
   
D.  Employees 58
   
E.  Share Ownership 59
   
ITEM 7.  MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS 61
   
A.  Major Shareholders 61
   
B.  Related Party Transactions 62
   
C.  Interests of Experts and Counsel 63
   
ITEM 8.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION 63
   
A.  Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information 63
   
B.  Significant Changes 63
   
ITEM 9.  THE OFFER AND LISTING 63
   
A.  Offer and Listing Details 63
   
B.  Plan of Distribution 66
   
C.  Markets 66

-iii-


Table of Contents
(continued)

  Page
   
D.  Selling Shareholder 66
   
E.  Dilution 66
   
F.  Expenses of the Issue 66
   
ITEM 10.  ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 66
   
A.  Share Capital 66
   
B.  Memorandum and Articles of Association 67
   
C.  Material Contracts 69
   
D.  Exchange Controls 69
   
E.  Certain United States Federal Income Tax Considerations 70
   
F.  Dividends and Paying Agents 79
   
G.  Statement By Experts 79
   
H.  Documents on Display 79
   
I.  Subsidiary Information 80
   
ITEM 11.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK. 80
   
ITEM 12.  DESCRIPTIONS OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES 80
   
PART II  
   
ITEM 13.  DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES. 80
   
ITEM 14.  MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS. 80
   
14.A.-D.  Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders 80
   
14.E.  Use of Proceeds 80
   
ITEM 15.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. 81
   
ITEM 16.A.  AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT 82
   
ITEM 16.B.  CODE OF ETHICS. 82
   
ITEM 16.C.  PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES 83
   
ITEM 16.D.  EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES 83
   
ITEM 16.E.  PURCHASE OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS 83
   
ITEM 16.F.  CHANGE IN REGISTRANT'S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT 84
   
ITEM 16.G.  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 84
   
ITEM 16.H.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE 84
   
ITEM 16.I.  DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT  INSPECTIONS 84
   
PART III  
   
ITEM 17.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 84
   
ITEM 18.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 84
   
ITEM 19.  EXHIBITS 84

-iv-


CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Form 20-F and the documents incorporated by reference herein contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and "forward-looking information" within the meaning of Canadian provincial securities laws (such forward-looking statements and forward-looking information are referred to herein as "forward-looking statements").  Forward-looking statements are necessarily based on a number of estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies.  All statements, other than statements which are reporting results as well as statements of historical fact, that address activities, events or developments that Loncor Gold Inc. (the "Company" or "Loncor") believes, expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future (including, without limitation, statements regarding drill results at the Adumbi deposit, mineral resource estimates, mineral resource increases, drill targets, future drilling, drilling and other exploration results, potential gold discoveries, potential mineralization, potential mineral resources, and the Company's exploration and development plans and objectives with respect to its projects) are forward-looking statements.  These forward-looking statements reflect the current expectations or beliefs of the Company based on information currently available to the Company.  Forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that may cause the actual events or results of the Company to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements, and even if such actual events or results are realized or substantially realized, there can be no assurance that they will have the expected consequences to, or effects on, the Company.  Factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from current expectations include, among other things: the possibility that future exploration (including drilling) or development results will not be consistent with the Company's expectations; the possibility that drilling programs will be delayed, uncertainties relating to the availability and costs of financing in the future; activities of the Company may be adversely impacted by the continued spread of "COVID-19" (as defined below), including the ability of the Company to secure additional financing; risks related to the exploration stage of the Company's properties; failure to establish estimated mineral resources; fluctuations in gold prices and currency exchange rates; inflation; rules adopted by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") that may affect mining operations in the Democratic Republic of the Congo; gold recoveries being less than those indicated by the metallurgical testwork carried out to date (there can be no assurance that gold recoveries in small scale laboratory tests will be duplicated in large tests under on-site conditions or during production); changes in equity markets; political developments in the Democratic Republic of the Congo; lack of infrastructure; failure to procure or maintain, or delays in procuring or maintaining, permits and approvals; lack of availability at a reasonable cost or at all, of plants, equipment or labour; inability to attract and retain key management and personnel; changes to regulations or policies affecting the Company's activities; the uncertainties involved in interpreting drilling results and other geological data; the Company's history of losses and expectation of future losses; the Company's ability to acquire additional commercially mineable mineral rights; risks related to the integration of any new acquisitions into the Company's existing operations; increased competition in the mining industry; and the other risks disclosed under the heading "Risk Factors" in this Form 20-F.

Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made and, except as may be required by applicable securities laws, the Company disclaims any intent or obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or results or otherwise.  Although the Company believes that the assumptions inherent in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and accordingly undue reliance should not be put on such statements due to the inherent uncertainty therein.

The mineral resource figures referred to in this Form 20-F are estimates and no assurances can be given that the indicated levels of gold will be produced.  Such estimates are expressions of judgment based on knowledge, mining experience, analysis of drilling results and industry practices.  Valid estimates made at a given time may significantly change when new information becomes available.  While the Company believes that the resource estimates included in this Form 20-F are well established, by their nature, resource estimates are imprecise and depend, to a certain extent, upon statistical inferences which may ultimately prove unreliable.  If such estimates are inaccurate or are reduced in the future, this could have a material adverse impact on the Company.

1


Due to the uncertainty that may be attached to inferred mineral resources, it cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will be upgraded to an indicated or measured mineral resource as a result of continued exploration.  Confidence in the estimate is insufficient to allow meaningful application of the technical and economic parameters to enable an evaluation of economic viability sufficient for public disclosure, except in certain limited circumstances.  Inferred mineral resources are excluded from estimates forming the basis of a feasibility study.

Statements concerning actual mineral resource estimates are also deemed to constitute forward-looking statements to the extent that they involve estimates of the mineralization that will be encountered if the relevant project or property is developed.  Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.  There is no certainty that mineral resources can be upgraded to mineral reserves through continued exploration.

INFORMATION REGARDING MINERAL INFORMATION

 

On October 31, 2018, the SEC adopted Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K (“Regulation S-K 1300”) along with the amendments to related rules and guidance in order to modernize the property disclosure requirements for mining registrants under the Securities Act and the Securities Exchange Act.  Registrants engaged in mining operations must comply with Regulation S-K 1300 for the first fiscal year beginning on or after January 1, 2021.  Accordingly, the Company is providing disclosure in compliance with Regulation S-K 1300 for its fiscal year ending December 31, 2021, and all of its mineral resources have been determined in accordance with Regulation S-K 1300.

CURRENCY

Unless stated otherwise or the context otherwise requires, all references in this Form 20-F to "US$" are to United States dollars and all references in this Form 20-F to "Cdn$" are to Canadian dollars.

2


PART 1

Item 1.  Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the United States Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the "U.S. Exchange Act") and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.

Item 2.  Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the U.S. Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.

Item 3.  Key Information

A. [Reserved]

B.  Capitalization and Indebtedness

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the U.S. Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.

C.  Reason for the Offer and Use of Proceeds

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the U.S. Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.

D.  Risk Factors

There are a number of risks that may have a material and adverse impact on the future operating and financial performance of Loncor and could cause the Company's operating and financial performance to differ materially from the estimates described in forward-looking statements relating to the Company. These include widespread risks associated with any form of business and specific risks associated with Loncor's business and its involvement in the gold exploration industry.

An investment in the Company's common shares is considered speculative and involves a high degree of risk due to, among other things, the nature of Loncor's business (which is the exploration of mineral properties), the present stage of its development and the location of Loncor's projects in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (the "DRC").  In addition to the other information presented in this Form 20-F, a prospective investor should carefully consider the risk factors set out below and the other information that Loncor files with the SEC and with Canadian securities regulators before investing in the Company's common shares.  The Company has identified the following non-exhaustive list of inherent risks and uncertainties that it considers to be relevant to its operations and business plans.  Such risk factors could materially affect the Company's future operating results and could cause actual events to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements relating to the Company.  As well, additional risks that the Company is unaware of or that are currently believed to be immaterial may become important factors that affect the Company's business.

3


The Company's business could be adversely impacted by the outbreak of contagious diseases, including the effect of the spread of coronavirus.

The Company is susceptible to risks related to the outbreak of contagious diseases, including the ongoing widespread outbreak of respiratory illness caused by a novel strain of the coronavirus ("COVID-19").  The Company's business could be adversely impacted by the effects of COVID-19 (as well as any other outbreak of contagious diseases).  During 2019, COVID-19 emerged in China and has since spread worldwide.  The extent to which COVID-19 impacts the Company's business, including its operations and the market for its securities, will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted at this time, and include the duration, severity and scope of the outbreak and the actions taken to contain or treat the COVID-19 outbreak (including the travel and quarantine restrictions currently being imposed by governments of affected countries).  In particular, the continued spread of COVID-19 globally could materially and adversely impact the Company's business including without limitation, employee health, workforce productivity, limitations on travel, the availability of industry experts and personnel, restrictions to the exploration and development of its mineral properties, including restrictions on drill programs and/or the timing to process drill and other metallurgical testing, and other factors that will depend on future developments beyond the Company's control, all of which may have a material and adverse effect on the its business, financial condition and results of operations.  There can be no assurance that the personnel of the Company and its partners and service providers will not be impacted by COVID-19 and ultimately see workforce productivity reduced or incur increased costs, including but limited to medical and insurance premiums.  In addition, COVID-19 has resulted in a widespread global health crisis that has significantly adversely affected global economies and capital markets, resulting in an economic downturn that could become much worse and have an adverse effect on the Company's future prospects, including its ability to secure financing from capital markets and further explore and develop its mineral properties. 

The Company has not generated revenues from operations and is wholly reliant upon external financing, does not have a history of mining operations, and there is no assurance that it will produce revenue, operate profitably or provide a return on investment in the future.

The Company has not generated revenues from operations and there is no assurance that it will produce revenue, operate profitably or provide a return on investment in the future.  The Company has only incurred operating losses, and the development of its projects is at an early stage.  The Company produced a loss of US$3,723,784 for the year ended December 31, 2021, and, as of that date, the Company's deficit was US$66,933,241 and the Company had a working capital deficit of US$1,178,733 which casts substantial doubt on the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.  The Company is subject to the risks and challenges experienced by other companies at a comparable stage.  These risks include, but are not limited to, continuing losses and the ability to secure adequate financing or to complete corporate transactions to meet the minimum capital required to successfully complete its projects and fund other operating expenses.

The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due.  As well, further exploration and development of the Company's current projects will require significant additional financing.  Given the current economic climate and state of capital markets, including the effects of the public health crisis resulting from COVID-19, the ability to raise funds may prove difficult.  The Company has no revenues and is wholly reliant upon external financing to fund its activities.  There can be no assurance that such financing will be available to the Company or, if it is, that it will be offered on acceptable terms.  If additional financing is raised through the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities of the Company, the interests of the Company's shareholders in the net assets of the Company may be diluted.  Any failure of the Company to obtain required financing on acceptable terms could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, and its ability to continue as a going concern, and may require the Company to cancel or postpone planned exploration or development activities on its mineral properties.

4


The auditor's report issued in respect of the Company's 2021 annual consolidated financial statements contains the following paragraph: 

 

"We draw attention to Note 2 in the consolidated financial statements, which describe the events and conditions that indicate the existence of material uncertainties that may cast significant doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter."

The assets and operations of Loncor are subject to political, economic and other uncertainties as a result of being located in the DRC.

Loncor's projects are located in the DRC.  The assets and operations of the Company are therefore subject to various political, economic and other uncertainties, including, among other things, the risks of war and civil unrest, hostage taking, expropriation, nationalization, renegotiation or nullification of existing licenses, permits, approvals and contracts, taxation policies, foreign exchange and repatriation restrictions, changing political conditions, international monetary fluctuations, currency controls and foreign governmental regulations that favour or require the awarding of contracts to local contractors or require foreign contractors to employ citizens of, or purchase supplies from, a particular jurisdiction.  Changes, if any, in mining or investment policies or shifts in political climate in the DRC may adversely affect Loncor's operations or profitability.  Operations may be affected in varying degrees by government regulations with respect to, but not limited to, restrictions on production, price controls, export controls, currency remittance, income taxes, foreign investment, maintenance of claims, environmental legislation, land use, land claims of local people, water use and mine safety.  Failure to comply strictly with applicable laws, regulations and local practices relating to mineral rights, could result in loss, reduction or expropriation of entitlements.  In addition, in the event of a dispute arising from operations in the DRC, the Company may be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of foreign courts or may not be successful in subjecting foreign persons to the jurisdiction of courts in Canada.  The Company also may be hindered or prevented from enforcing its rights with respect to a governmental instrumentality because of the doctrine of sovereign immunity.  It is not possible for the Company to accurately predict such developments or changes in laws or policy or to what extent any such developments or changes may have a material adverse effect on the Company's operations.  Should the Company's rights or its titles not be honoured or become unenforceable for any reason, or if any material term of these agreements is arbitrarily changed by the government of the DRC, the Company's business, financial condition and prospects will be materially adversely affected.

Some or all of the Company's properties are located in regions where political instability and violence is ongoing.  Some or all of the Company's properties are inhabited by artisanal miners.  These conditions may interfere with work on the Company's properties and present a potential security threat to the Company's employees.  There is a risk that activities at the Company's properties may be delayed or interfered with, due to the conditions of political instability, violence, hostage taking or the inhabitation of the properties by artisanal miners.  The Company uses its best efforts to maintain good relations with the local communities in order to minimize such risks.

The DRC is a developing nation emerging from a period of civil war and conflict.  Physical and institutional infrastructure throughout the DRC is in a debilitated condition.  The DRC is in transition from a largely state controlled economy to one based on free market principles, and from a non-democratic political system with a centralized ethnic power base, to one based on more democratic principles.  There can be no assurance that these changes will be effected or that the achievement of these objectives will not have material adverse consequences for Loncor and its operations.  The DRC continues to experience instability in parts of the country due to certain militia and criminal elements.  While the government and United Nations forces are working to support the extension of central government authority throughout the country, there can be no assurance that such efforts will be successful.

5


No assurance can be given that the Company will be able to maintain effective security in connection with its assets or personnel in the DRC where civil war and conflict have disrupted exploration and mining activities in the past and may affect the Company's operations or plans in the future.

 

HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases represent a serious threat to maintaining a skilled workforce in the mining industry in the DRC.  HIV/AIDS is a major healthcare challenge faced by operations in the country.  There can be no assurance that the Company will not lose members of its workforce or workforce man-hours or incur increased medical costs, which may have a material adverse effect on the Company's operations.

The DRC has historically experienced relatively high rates of inflation.

The Company's properties are in the exploration stage, and there can be no assurance that the Company's exploration activities will result in discoveries that are commercially viable.

The Company's properties are in the exploration stage.  The future development of properties found to be economically feasible will require board approval, the construction and operation of mines, processing plants and related infrastructure.  As a result, Loncor is subject to all of the risks associated with establishing new mining operations and business enterprises including: the timing and cost, which can be considerable, of the construction of mining and processing facilities; the availability and costs of skilled labour and mining equipment; the availability and costs of appropriate smelting and/or refining arrangements; the need to obtain necessary environmental and other governmental approvals and permits, and the timing of those approvals and permits; and, the availability of funds to finance construction and development activities.  The costs, timing and complexities of mine construction and development are increased by the remote location of the Company's properties.  It is common in new mining operations to experience unexpected problems and delays during construction, development, and mine start-up.  In addition, delays in the commencement of mineral production often occur.  Accordingly, there are no assurances that the Company's activities will result in profitable mining operations or that the Company will successfully establish mining operations or profitably produce gold at any of its properties.

The Company may be adversely affected by fluctuations in gold prices.

The future price of gold will significantly affect the development of Loncor's projects.  Gold prices are subject to significant fluctuation and are affected by a number of factors which are beyond Loncor's control.  Such factors include, but are not limited to, interest rates, inflation or deflation, fluctuation in the value of the United States dollar and foreign currencies, global and regional supply and demand, and the political and economic conditions of major gold-producing countries throughout the world.  The price of gold has fluctuated widely in recent years, and future price declines could cause development of and commercial production from Loncor's mineral interests to be impracticable.  The current global health crisis caused by COVID-19 has significantly adversely affected global economies and capital markets, resulting in significant fluctuations in the gold price.  If the price of gold decreases, projected cash flow from planned mining operations may not be sufficient to justify ongoing operations and Loncor could be forced to discontinue development and sell its projects.  Future production from Loncor's projects is dependent on gold prices that are adequate to make these projects economic. 

6


The Company's activities are subject to various laws and government approvals and no assurance can be given that the Company will be successful in obtaining or maintaining such approvals or that it will successfully comply with all applicable laws.

Loncor's mineral exploration activities are subject to various laws governing prospecting, mining, development, production, taxes, labour standards and occupational health, mine safety, toxic substances, land use, water use, land claims of local people and other matters.  Although Loncor's exploration activities are carried out in accordance with all applicable rules and regulations, no assurance can be given that new rules and regulations will not be enacted or that existing rules and regulations will not be applied in a manner which could limit or curtail development.

Many of Loncor's mineral rights and interests are subject to government approvals, licenses and permits. Such approvals, licenses and permits are, as a practical matter, subject to the discretion of the DRC government.  No assurance can be given that Loncor will be successful in maintaining any or all of the various approvals, licenses and permits in full force and effect without modification or revocation.  To the extent such approvals are not maintained, Loncor may be delayed, curtailed or prohibited from continuing or proceeding with planned exploration of mineral properties.

Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permitting requirements may result in enforcement actions thereunder, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities causing operations to cease or be delayed or curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment, or remedial actions.  Parties engaged in the exploration or development of mineral properties may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of the activities and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of applicable laws or regulations.

Amendments to current laws and regulations governing operations or more stringent implementation thereof could have a substantial adverse impact on Loncor and cause increases in exploration expenses, capital expenditures or require abandonment or delays in development of mineral interests.

Exploration, development and mining involve a high degree of risk.

All of the Company's properties are in the exploration stage only.  The exploration for and development of mineral deposits involves significant risks that even a combination of careful evaluation, experience and knowledge may not eliminate.  While the discovery of an ore body may result in substantial rewards, few properties that are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines.  Major expenditures may be required to locate and establish mineral reserves, to develop metallurgical processes and to construct mining and processing facilities at a particular site.  Whether a mineral deposit, once discovered, will be commercially viable depends on a number of factors, some of which are: the particular attributes of the deposit, such as size, grade and proximity to infrastructure; metal prices which are highly cyclical; and government regulations, including regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and exporting of minerals and environmental protection.  The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the combination of these factors may result in Loncor not receiving an adequate return on invested capital. 

There is no certainty that expenditures made towards the search for and evaluation of mineral deposits will result in discoveries that are commercially viable.  In addition, assuming discovery of a commercial ore-body, depending on the type of mining operation involved, several years can elapse from the initial phase of drilling until commercial operations are commenced.

7


Mining operations generally involve a high degree of risk.  Such operations are subject to all the hazards and risks normally encountered in the exploration for, and development and production of gold and other precious or base metals, including unusual and unexpected geologic formations, seismic activity, rock bursts, fires, cave-ins, flooding and other conditions involved in the drilling and removal of material as well as industrial accidents, labour force disruptions, fall of ground accidents in underground operations, unanticipated increases in gold lock-up and inventory levels at heap-leach operations and force majeure factors, any of which could result in damage to, or destruction of, mines and other producing facilities, damage to person or property, environmental damage, delays, increased production costs, monetary losses and possible legal liability.  Milling operations are subject to hazards such as equipment failure or failure of mining pit slopes and retaining dams around tailings disposal areas, which may result in environmental pollution and consequent liability.  The Company may not be able to obtain insurance to cover these risks at economically feasible premiums.  Insurance against certain environmental risks, including potential liability for pollution or other hazards as a result of the disposal of waste products occurring from production, is not generally available to the Company or to other companies within the mining industry.  The Company may suffer a material adverse effect on its business if it incurs losses related to any significant events that are not covered by insurance policies.

There can be no assurance that an active market for the Company's securities will be sustained.

The market price of the Company's securities may fluctuate significantly based on a number of factors, some of which are unrelated to the financial performance or prospects of the Company.  These factors include macroeconomic developments in North America and globally, market perceptions of the attractiveness of particular industries, short-term changes in commodity prices, other precious metal prices, the attractiveness of alternative investments, currency exchange fluctuation, the political environment in the DRC and the Company's financial condition or results of operations as reflected in its consolidated financial statements.  These factors also currently include the impact of COVID-19, which has resulted in a widespread global health crisis that has significantly adversely affected global economies and capital markets, resulting in extreme volatility in capital markets.  Other factors unrelated to the performance of the Company that may have an effect on the price of the securities of the Company include the following: the extent of analytical coverage available to investors concerning the business of the Company may be limited if investment banks with research capabilities do not follow the Company's securities; lessening in trading volume and general market interest in the Company's securities may affect an investor's ability to trade significant numbers of securities of the Company; the size of the Company's public float may limit the ability of some institutions to invest in the Company's securities; the Company's operating performance and the performance of competitors and other similar companies; the public's reaction to the Company's press releases, other public announcements and the Company's filings with the various securities regulatory authorities; changes in estimates or recommendations by research analysts who track the Company's securities or the shares of other companies in the resource sector; the arrival or departure of key personnel; acquisitions, strategic alliances or joint ventures involving the Company or its competitors; the factors listed in this Form 20-F under the heading "Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements"; and a substantial decline in the price of the securities of the Company that persists for a significant period of time could cause the Company's securities to be delisted from any exchange on which they are listed at that time, further reducing market liquidity.  If there is no active market for the securities of the Company, the liquidity of an investor's investment may be limited and the price of the securities of the Company may decline.  If such a market does not develop, investors may lose their entire investment in the Company's securities.

8


The Company expects that it will be considered a passive foreign investment company or "PFIC".

Holders of common shares of the Company that are U.S. taxpayers should be aware that, due to the nature of the Company's assets and the income that it expects to generate, the Company expects to be a "passive foreign investment company" ("PFIC") for the current year, and may be a PFIC in subsequent taxable years.  Whether the Company will be a PFIC for the current tax year or any future tax year will depend on the Company's assets and income over the course of each such taxable year and, as a result, cannot be predicted with certainty as of the date of this Form 20-F.  Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge the determination made by the Company concerning its PFIC status for any tax year.  U.S. federal income tax laws contain rules which result in materially adverse tax consequences to U.S. taxpayers that own shares of a corporation which has been classified as a PFIC during any taxable year of such holder's holding period.  A U.S. taxpayer who holds stock in a foreign corporation during any year in which such corporation qualifies as a PFIC may mitigate such negative tax consequences by making certain U.S. federal income tax elections, which are subject to numerous restrictions and limitations.  Holders of the Company's common shares are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of the Company's common shares.  This paragraph is only a brief summary of the PFIC rules, and is qualified in its entirety by the section below entitled "Certain United States Federal Income Tax Considerations".

The Company has a history of losses and may never achieve revenues or profitability.

The Company has incurred losses from operations since its inception and the Company expects to incur losses from operations for the foreseeable future.  The Company had an accumulated deficit of US$66,933,241 as of December 31, 2021.  The losses do not include capitalized mineral property exploration costs.  The Company expects to continue to incur losses unless and until such time as one or more of its properties enter into commercial production and generate sufficient revenues to fund continuing operations.  The development of the Company's properties will require the commitment of substantial financial resources.  The amount and timing of expenditures will depend on a number of factors, including the progress of ongoing exploration and development, the results of consultants' analysis and recommendations, the rate at which operating losses are incurred, and the Company's acquisition of additional properties, some of which are beyond the Company's control.  There can be no assurance that the Company will ever achieve profitability.

In order to develop any of its projects the Company will need to establish the facilities and material necessary to support operations in the remote locations in which they are situated, which lack basic infrastructure.

The Company's projects are located in remote areas of the DRC, which lack basic infrastructure, including sources of power, water, housing, food and transport.  In order to develop any of its projects Loncor will need to establish the facilities and material necessary to support operations in the remote locations in which they are situated.  The remoteness of each project will affect the potential viability of mining operations, as Loncor will also need to establish substantially greater sources of power, water, physical plant and transport infrastructure than are currently present in the area.  The transportation of equipment and supplies into the DRC and the transportation of resources out of the DRC may also be subject to delays that adversely affect the ability of the Company to proceed with its mineral projects in the country in a timely manner.  Shortages of the supply of diesel, mechanical parts and other items required for the Company's operations could have an adverse effect on the Company's business, operating results and financial condition.  The lack of availability of such sources may adversely affect mining feasibility and will, in any event, require Loncor to arrange significant financing, locate adequate supplies and obtain necessary approvals from national, provincial and regional governments, none of which can be assured.  The Company's interests in the DRC are accessed over lands that may also be subject to the interests of third parties which may result in further delays and disputes in the carrying out of the Company's operational activities. 

9


There is uncertainty in the estimation of mineral resources.

The mineral resource figures referred to in this Form 20-F and in the Company's filings with the SEC and applicable Canadian securities regulatory authorities, press releases and other public statements that may be made from time to time are estimates.  These estimates are imprecise and depend upon geological interpretation and statistical inferences drawn from drilling and sampling analysis, which may prove to be unreliable.  There can be no assurance that these estimates will be accurate or that this mineralization could be mined or processed profitably.

The Company has not commenced commercial production on any of its properties, and has not defined or delineated any proven or probable reserves on any of its properties.  Mineralization estimates for the Company's properties may require adjustments or downward revisions based upon further exploration or development work or actual production experience.  In addition, the grade of ore ultimately mined, if any, may differ from that indicated by drilling results.  There can be no assurance that minerals recovered in small scale tests will be duplicated in large scale tests under on-site conditions or in production scale.

The resource estimates referred to in this Form 20-F have been determined and valued based on assumed future prices, cut-off grades and operating costs that may prove to be inaccurate.  Extended declines in the market price for gold may render portions of the Company's mineralization uneconomic and result in reduced reported mineralization.  Any material reductions in estimates of mineralization, or of the Company's ability to extract this mineralization, could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations or financial condition.

The Company has not established the presence of any proven or probable reserves at any of its properties.  There can be no assurance that subsequent testing or future studies will establish proven and probable reserves on such properties.  The failure to establish proven and probable reserves on such properties could severely restrict the Company's ability to successfully implement its strategies for long-term growth.

There is uncertainty relating to inferred mineral resources.

There is a risk that the inferred mineral resources referred to in this Form 20-F cannot be converted into mineral reserves as the ability to assess geological continuity is not sufficient to demonstrate economic viability.  Due to the uncertainty that may attach to inferred mineral resources, there is no assurance that inferred mineral resources will be upgraded to resources with sufficient geological continuity to constitute proven and probable mineral reserves as a result of continued exploration.

The Company is exposed to a heightened degree of risk due to the lack of property diversification.

The Company's focus is the Ngayu Greenstone Belt in the DRC, in particular the Company's Adumbi deposit at its Imbo Project.  Any adverse development affecting the progress of its Ngayu properties, in particular the Company's Adumbi deposit, may have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial performance and results of operations.

10


Negative market perception of junior mineral exploration companies could adversely affect the Company.

Market perception of junior mineral exploration companies such as the Company may shift such that these companies are viewed less favourably.  This factor could impact the value of investors' holdings and the ability of the Company to raise further funds, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and prospects.

The SEC has adopted rules that may affect mining operations in the DRC.

The Company's business is subject to evolving corporate governance and public disclosure regulations that have increased both the Company's compliance costs and the risk of noncompliance, which could have an adverse effect on the Company's stock price.

The Company is subject to changing rules and regulations promulgated by a number of United States and Canadian governmental and self-regulated organizations, including the SEC, the Canadian Securities Administrators, the Toronto Stock Exchange, and the International Accounting Standards Board.  These rules and regulations continue to evolve in scope and complexity and many new requirements have been created in response to laws enacted by the United States Congress, making compliance more difficult and uncertain.  For example, on July 21, 2010, the United States Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, pursuant to which the SEC adopted rules which require a company filing reports with the SEC to disclose on an annual basis whether certain "conflict minerals" necessary to the functionality or production of a product manufactured by such company originated in the DRC or any adjoining country.  The Company currently holds properties located in the DRC.  It is possible that the SEC rules regarding conflict minerals could adversely affect the value of the minerals mined in the DRC, which may impact the value of the Company's interests in those properties.  The Company's efforts to comply with the Dodd-Frank Act, the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, and other new rules and regulations have resulted in, and are likely to continue to result in, increased general and administration expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from potential revenue-generating activities to compliance activities.

The Company is not insured to cover potential risks.

The Company currently does not have insurance to cover potential risks associated with its operations, including industrial accidents, damages to equipment and facilities, labour disputes, pollution, unusual or unexpected geological conditions, rock bursts, ground or slope failures, cave-ins, fires, changes in the regulatory environment and natural phenomena such as inclement weather conditions, floods, earthquakes and other environmental occurrences.  Losses from these events may cause Loncor to incur significant costs that could have a material adverse effect upon its financial performance and results of operations.

The Company's operations may be adversely affected by environmental hazards on the properties and related environmental regulations.

All phases of Loncor's operations are subject to environmental regulation.  These regulations mandate, among other things, the maintenance of air and water quality standards and land reclamation.  They also set forth limitations on the generation, transportation, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous waste.  Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner which will require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees.  Compliance with environmental laws and regulations may require significant capital outlays on behalf of the Company and may cause material changes or delays in the Company's intended activities.  There is no assurance that future changes in environmental regulation, if any, will not adversely affect Loncor's operations.  Environmental hazards may exist on the properties on which Loncor holds interests which are unknown to Loncor at present and which have been caused by previous owners or operators of the properties.  Reclamation costs are uncertain and planned expenditures may differ from the actual expenditures required. 

11


The Company is a foreign corporation and all of the Company's directors and officers except one director are outside the United States, which makes enforcement of civil liabilities difficult.

The Company is organized under the laws of the Province of Ontario in Canada, and its principal executive office is located in Toronto, Canada.  All of the Company's directors and officers except one director reside outside of the United States, and all or a substantial portion of their assets, and all or a substantial portion of the Company's assets, are located outside of the United States.  As a result, it may be difficult for investors in the United States or otherwise outside of Canada to bring an action against directors, officers or experts who are not resident in the United States or in other jurisdictions outside Canada.  It may also be difficult for an investor to enforce a judgment obtained in a United States court or a court of another jurisdiction of residence predicated upon the civil liability provisions of federal securities laws or other laws of the United States or any state thereof or the equivalent laws of other jurisdictions outside Canada against those persons or the Company. 

The Company's business depends on its ability to identify and acquire commercially mineable mineral rights, and there can be no assurances that it will be successful in such efforts.

Most exploration projects do not result in the discovery of commercially mineable ore deposits and no assurance can be given that any anticipated level of recovery of ore reserves will be realized or that any identified mineral deposit will ever qualify as a commercially mineable (or viable) ore body which can be legally and economically exploited.  Estimates of reserves, resources, mineral deposits and production costs can also be affected by such factors as environmental permitting regulations and requirements, weather, environmental factors, unforeseen technical difficulties, unusual or unexpected geological formations and work interruptions.  Material changes in ore reserves, grades, stripping ratios or recovery rates may affect the economic viability of any project.

Loncor's future growth and productivity will depend, in part, on its ability to identify and acquire additional commercially mineable mineral rights, and on the costs and results of continued exploration and development programs.  Mineral exploration is highly speculative in nature and is frequently non-productive.  Substantial expenditures are required to: establish ore reserves through drilling and metallurgical and other testing techniques; determine metal content and metallurgical recovery processes to extract metal from the ore; and construct, renovate or expand mining and processing facilities.

In addition, if the Company discovers ore, it would take several years from the initial phases of exploration until production is possible.  During this time, the economic feasibility of production may change.  As a result of these uncertainties, there can be no assurance that the Company will successfully acquire additional commercially mineable (or viable) mineral rights.

Litigation may adversely affect the Company's financial position, results of operations or the Company's project development operations.

The Company may from time to time be involved in various legal proceedings.  While the Company believes it is unlikely that the final outcome of any such proceedings will have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or results of operation, defence and settlement costs can be substantial, even with respect to claims that have no merit.  Due to the inherent uncertainty of the litigation process, there can be no assurance that the resolution of any particular legal matter will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's future cash flow, results of operations or financial condition.

12


Future hedging activities may result in selling products at a price lower than could have otherwise been received.

The Company has not entered into forward contracts or other derivative instruments to sell gold that it might produce in the future.  Although the Company has no near term plans to enter such transactions, it may do so in the future if required for project financing.  Forward contracts obligate the holder to sell hedged production at a price set when the holder enters into the contract, regardless of what the price is when the product is actually mined.  Accordingly, there is a risk that the price of the product is higher at the time it is mined than when the Company entered into the contracts, so that the product must be sold at a price lower than could have been received if the contract was not entered.  There is also the risk that the Company may have insufficient gold production to deliver into forward sales positions.  The Company may enter into option contracts for gold to mitigate the effects of such hedging.

Increased sales of the Company's common shares by shareholders could lower the trading price of the shares.

Sales of a large number of the Company's common shares in the public markets, or the potential for such sales, could decrease the trading price of such shares and could impair Loncor's ability to raise capital through future sales of common shares. 

Fluctuations in currency could have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.

The Company uses the United States dollar as its functional currency.  Fluctuations in the value of the United States dollar relative to other currencies (including the Canadian dollar) could have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements by creating gains or losses.  No currency hedge policies are in place or are presently contemplated.

The loss of key management personnel or the inability to recruit additional qualified personnel may adversely affect the Company's business.

The success of the Company depends on the good faith, experience and judgment of the Company's management and advisors in supervising and providing for the effective management of the business and the operations of the Company.  The Company is dependent on a small number of key personnel, the loss of any one of whom could have an adverse effect on the Company.  The Company currently does not have key person insurance on these individuals.  The Company may need to recruit additional qualified personnel to supplement existing management and there is no assurance that the Company will be able to attract such personnel.

The Company may not be able to compete with current and potential exploration companies, some of whom have greater resources and technical facilities.

The natural resource industry is intensely competitive in all of its phases.  Significant competition exists for the acquisition of properties producing, or capable of producing, gold or other metals.  The Company competes with many companies possessing greater financial resources and technical facilities than itself.  The Company may also encounter increasing competition from other mining companies in its efforts to hire experienced mining professionals.  As well, there is competition for exploration resources at all levels, particularly affecting the availability of manpower, drill rigs and helicopters.  Increased competition could also adversely affect the Company's ability to attract necessary capital funding or acquire suitable producing properties or prospects for mineral exploration in the future.

13


Certain directors and officers may be in a position of conflict of interest with respect to the Company due to their relationship with other resource companies.

Directors and officers of the Company also serve as directors and/or officers of other companies involved in the exploration and development of natural resource properties.  As a result, conflicts may arise between the obligations of these individuals to the Company and to such other companies.

The Company has never paid and has no plans to pay dividends.

The Company has not paid out any cash dividends to date and has no plans to do so in the immediate future.  As a result, an investor's return on investment in the Company's common shares will be solely determined by his or her ability to sell such shares in the secondary market.

Trading of the Company's common shares in the United States may be effected by its voluntary delisting from the NYSE American.

The Company's common shares are traded exclusively in the United States on the OTCQX tier of the OTC Markets.  The Company's common shares previously traded on the NYSE American, and the OTCQX does not require the same level of disclosure and compliance requirements compared to the NYSE American.  The Company is still, however, required to meet its SEC filing requirements and to meet its Toronto Stock Exchange and Canadian filing, compliance and disclosure requirements.  As the Company's common shares are no longer listed on the NYSE American, shareholders will not be able to trade its common shares on the NYSE American and certain federal and state securities law exemptions for its common shares would no longer be available.  Consequently, the trading market for the Company's securities in the United States will be limited.

The value of the Company's common shares, as well as its ability to raise equity capital, may be impacted by future issuances of shares.

The Company is authorized under its articles to issue an unlimited number of common shares.  The Company may issue more common shares in the future.  Sales of substantial amounts of common shares (including shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options or warrants), or the perception that such sales could occur, could materially adversely affect prevailing market prices for the common shares and the ability of the Company to raise equity capital in the future. 

The Company is subject to climate change risks which may impact the Company's operations

Legislative and regulatory measures to address climate change and greenhouse gas emissions are in various phases of consideration.  If adopted, such measures could increase the Company's cost of environmental compliance and also delay or otherwise negatively affect efforts to obtain permits and other regulatory approvals.  Proposed measures could also result in increased cost of fuel and other consumables used at the Company's operations.  Adoption of these or similar new environmental regulations or more stringent application of existing regulations may materially increase the Company's costs, threaten certain operating activities and constrain its opportunities.

14


Forward-looking statements may prove to be inaccurate.

Investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.  By their nature, forward-looking statements involve numerous assumptions, known and unknown risks and uncertainties, of both general and specific nature, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements or contribute to the possibility that predictions, forecasts or projections will prove to be materially inaccurate.  Additional information on such risks, assumptions and uncertainties can be found in this Form 20-F under the heading "Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Statements".

Item 4.  Information on the Company

A.  History and Development of the Company

The Company is a corporation which was formed under the Ontario Business Corporations Act on August 24, 1993.  A summary of the Company's legal names since its formation is provided in Item 14 of this annual report on Form 20-F.  The head office and registered office of the Company is located at 1 First Canadian Place, Suite 7070, 100 King Street West, Toronto, Ontario, M5X 1E3, Canada.  The telephone number of such office is (416) 361-2510.

On November 28, 2008, the Company completed the acquisition (the "Acquisition") of all of the outstanding shares of the private company, Loncor Resources Inc. ("Old Loncor").  Also on November 28, 2008, immediately following this acquisition, the Company amalgamated with Old Loncor and, pursuant to the amalgamation, changed its name from Nevada Bob's International Inc. to Loncor Resources Inc.  As a result of this acquisition, the business of the Company is the exploration of mineral properties in the DRC. 

In September 2009, the Company completed a non-brokered private placement of 1,500,000 common shares at a price of Cdn$1.50 per share for proceeds to the Company of Cdn$2,250,000.

In October 2009, the Company announced the appointment of Peter Cowley as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company.  Mr. Cowley was also appointed to the board of directors of the Company.  Arnold Kondrat was appointed Executive Vice President of the Company and relinquished the title of Chairman of the Board of the Company.  In connection with Mr. Cowley's appointment as a director of the Company, Geoffrey Farr stepped down as a director of the Company but remains Corporate Secretary of the Company.

In February 2010, the Company completed a brokered private placement financing involving the issuance of 4,083,250 units of the Company at a price of Cdn$2.50 per unit for aggregate gross proceeds of Cdn$10,208,125.  Each such unit was comprised of one common share of the Company and one-half of one common share purchase warrant of the Company, with each full warrant entitling the holder to purchase one common share of the Company at a price of Cdn$2.90 for a period of 24 months.  GMP Securities L.P. as lead agent, together with CI Capital Markets Inc. and Salman Partners Inc., acted as the Company's agents in connection with this financing. 

Also in February 2010, the Company completed a non-brokered private placement financing involving the issuance to an affiliate ("Newmont") of Newmont Mining Corporation of 2,000,000 units of the Company at a price of Cdn$2.50 per unit for aggregate gross proceeds of Cdn$5,000,000.  The units issued under this financing had the same terms as the units issued under the February 2010 brokered private placement.  In December 2010, Newmont exercised the 1,000,000 warrants that it had acquired under the said February 2010 non-brokered private placement, resulting in the issuance by the Company to Newmont of 1,000,000 common shares of the Company at a price of Cdn$2.90 per share for gross proceeds to the Company of Cdn$2,900,000.

15


The Company established the main Ngayu exploration camp in early 2010 at the Yindi prospect, located in the southwest corner of the Ngayu gold project area.

In June 2010, the Company announced initial assay results from the Makapela prospect at the Company's Ngayu gold project.  A core drilling program at Makapela commenced in November 2010 with the objective of testing along strike and at depth the sub vertical, vein mineralized system being exploited by the artisanal miners at the Main, North and Sele Sele pits which returned significant results from channel sampling.  Drill results at Makapela were announced by the Company via a number of press releases in 2011 and 2012. 

Exploration at the Itali prospect at the Company's Ngayu gold project commenced during the third quarter of 2010.  The Itali prospect is located about 10 kilometres south of Makapela.  In January 2012, the Company announced the results of its first drill hole at the Itali prospect.  Additional drill results at the Itali prospect were announced by the Company in October 2012. 

In December 2010, the Company completed a non-brokered private placement with Newmont involving the issuance by the Company to Newmont of 1,000,000 units of the Company at a price of Cdn$3.90 per unit for aggregate gross proceeds of Cdn$3,900,000.  Each such unit was comprised of one common share of the Company and one-half of one common share purchase warrant of the Company.  Each full warrant was exercisable into one additional common share of the Company at a price of Cdn$4.60 until December 2012 (these warrants expired in December 2012 without being exercised).

In February 2011, the Company and Newmont entered into a technology consultation services agreement pursuant to which Newmont agreed to make available to Loncor, at Loncor's reasonable request, exploration consultation services to assist Loncor in the exploration of Loncor's Ngayu gold project.   

Also in February 2011, the Company completed concurrent brokered and non-brokered private placement equity financings.  Pursuant to a "bought deal" private placement financing conducted by a syndicate of investment dealers, the Company issued 4,250,000 common shares of the Company at a price of Cdn$4.70 per share, resulting in aggregate gross proceeds of Cdn$19,975,000.  The Company also issued, by way of non-brokered private placement, to Newmont, 850,000 common shares of the Company at a price of Cdn$4.70 per share for aggregate proceeds of Cdn$3,995,000.

In April 2011, the Company's common shares commenced trading on the NYSE American LLC (formerly called NYSE Amex LLC).  The Company retained its primary listing on the TSX Venture Exchange.

In December 2011, the Company announced the results of the regional assessment of its Ngayu gold project.  The targets were outlined by assessing the results of two regional BLEG (Bulk Leach Extractable Gold) geochemical surveys conducted during 2011 as part of the technology consultation services agreement between Loncor and Newmont.  In accordance with this agreement, Loncor was able to utilize advanced exploration assessment techniques developed by Newmont.  As part of this evaluation program, the BLEG results were assessed in conjunction with a detailed geophysical magnetic interpretation of the Ngayu Greenstone belt also undertaken by senior Newmont geophysicists to define the target areas.  The initial BLEG survey commenced in March 2011 and comprised the collection of 418 stream sediment samples, at an average sample density of one sample per 10 square kilometres.  A second round of infill BLEG sampling was undertaken in September 2011 consisting of 185 samples at an average sample density of one sample per four square kilometres.  Samples were sent to Newmont's proprietary geochemical laboratory in Perth, Australia for preparation and analysis.  From these results, six high priority targets were delineated together with seven medium priority targets for follow up. 

16


In January 2012, the Company announced initial bottle roll metallurgical testwork results for the Makapela prospect at the Company's Ngayu gold project.  Bottle roll is a preliminary metallurgical test to determine how much and how easily gold may be liberated from an ore using cyanide. 

In May 2012, the Company announced a maiden mineral resource estimate for the Company's Makapela prospect, of 4.10 million tonnes grading 7.59 g/t Au (using a 2.75 g/t Au cut-off) for an inferred mineral resource of 1.0 million ounces of gold.  The Company also announced that this mineral resource was outlined down to a maximum vertical depth 500 metres below surface with gold mineralization open at depth.

In June 2012, the Company announced an exploration update on its regional target follow-up at its Ngayu gold project, reporting that initial groundwork on the priority regional targets has delineated significant mineralized gold trends at Nagasa (4.5 kilometres), Matete (2.0 kilometres) and Mondarabe (1.5 kilometres) in the Imva Fold area.  The Company also reported that it had commenced a preliminary economic assessment of the Makapela prospect. 

In October 2012, the Company completed two financings concurrently, raising total gross proceeds of Cdn$14,799,750.  The first financing involved the issuance of 4,622,500 common shares of the Company at a price of Cdn$2.10 per share for aggregate gross proceeds of Cdn$9,707,250.  This offering was conducted by a syndicate of investment dealers and was made by way of a short form prospectus filed with securities regulatory authorities in all of the provinces of Canada (other than Québec).  The said shares were also offered on a private placement basis in certain jurisdictions outside of Canada.  The second financing involved a non-brokered private placement to Newmont of 2,425,000 common shares of the Company at a price of Cdn$2.10 per share for aggregate gross proceeds of Cdn$5,092,500.  As of the date of this Form 20-F, Newmont holds 7,275,000 (representing 5.17%) of the outstanding common shares of the Company. 

In April 2013, the Company announced updated mineral resource estimates for the Company's Makapela prospect, of an indicated mineral resource of 0.61 million ounces of gold (2.20 million tonnes grading at 8.66 g/t Au) and an inferred mineral resource of 0.55 million ounces of gold (3.22 million tonnes grading at 5.30 g/t Au).

In April 2013, the Company announced results of IP surveys at the Company's Nagasa prospect at the Ngayu project, which surveys identified three well-defined, open-ended anomalous zones.  The Company had acquired IP equipment in January 2013 with the objectives of: (a) locating potentially mineralized zones in areas covered by transported overburden where soil geochemistry is problematic, such as at Nagasa, and (b) testing for "blind" ore bodies where mineralization does not reach surface.

The Company's common shares began trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange effective April 26, 2013 and were delisted from the TSX Venture Exchange at the same time.

In July 2013, the Company updated exploration activities at its Ngayu project including announcing drilling results.  The Company also reported that, as a result of the sharp decrease in the gold price, the Company would be reducing its exploration effort and overhead costs until market conditions improve.  The Company further reported that, in terms of the Makapela preliminary economic assessment, due to the sharply lower gold price, it was decided to not incur any further expenditure on the study until the gold market improves. 

17


As a result of the sharp decline in gold prices in 2013 and the difficult financing prospects for gold exploration companies in general and the Company in particular, the Company substantially reduced exploration efforts at its projects in order to conserve cash.  From the end of September 2013 until the joint venture agreement signed with Randgold in January 2016, the Company undertook mainly assessment of exploration work undertaken earlier in 2013 at Ngayu and selecting prospects at Ngayu requiring further investigation.  In addition, new historical data was obtained for the North Kivu project in order to select target areas for follow up. 

In April 2014, Loncor voluntarily delisted from the NYSE American LLC.

In February 2015, Peter Cowley stepped down from his roles as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company for personal reasons.  Mr. Cowley agreed to provide advisory services to Loncor.  Arnold T. Kondrat ("Kondrat"), Founder and a director of the Company and who at the time was Executive Vice President of the Company, was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. 

In February 2015, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement of 4,000,000 common shares of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.12 per share for gross proceeds of Cdn$480,000.  In March 2015, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement of 750,000 common shares of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.24 per share for gross proceeds of Cdn$180,000.

In January 2016, Loncor's subsidiary, Loncor Resources Congo SARL ("Loncor Subco"), entered into a joint venture agreement (the "Agreement") with Randgold Resources (DRC) Limited ("Randgold").  The Agreement provided for a joint venture (the "Loncor Congo Joint Venture") between Loncor Subco and Randgold covering all of the exploration permit areas comprising at the time of the Agreement Loncor's Ngayu project, other than certain parcels of land surrounding and including the Makapela and Yindi prospects which were retained by Loncor Subco and did not form part of the Loncor Congo Joint Venture.  Randgold had certain preemptive rights over these two areas.  Under the Agreement, Randgold managed and funded all exploration of the said permit areas until the completion of a prefeasibility study on any gold discovery meeting the investment criteria of Randgold.  Once the Loncor Congo Joint Venture had determined to move ahead with a full feasibility study, a special purpose vehicle ("SPV") would be created to hold the specific discovery areas.  Subject to the DRC's free carried interest requirements, Randgold would retain 65% of the SPV with Loncor Subco holding the balance of 35%.  Loncor Subco would be required, from that point forward, to fund its pro-rata share of the SPV in order to maintain its 35% interest or be diluted.   

In February 2016, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement of 33,500,000 common shares of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.03 per share for gross proceeds of Cdn$1,005,000.  Kondrat acquired 30,000,000 of the common shares issued under this private placement. 

In April 2016, the Company announced that its joint venture partner, Randgold, would commence a regional helicopter-borne VTEM B-Field, Horizontal Magnetic Gradiometer geophysical survey (the "JV Survey") over Loncor's Ngayu project.  The JV Survey flight path design was north-south orientated lines at 400 meter spacing for a total of approximately 10,000 line kilometres, of which 4,200 line kilometers would be flown over the Ngayu project.   

In June 2016, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement of 875,000 units of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.24 per unit for gross proceeds of Cdn$210,000.  Each such unit was comprised of one common share of the Company and one-half of one warrant of the Company, with each full warrant entitling the holder to purchase one common share of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.36 for a period of two years.

18


In January 2017, the Company announced preliminary results of the JV Survey undertaken by Randgold under the Loncor Congo Joint Venture.  The JV Survey was performed by Geotech Airborne Limited. 

In February 2017, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement of 2,000,000 units of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.24 per unit for gross proceeds of Cdn$480,000.  Each such unit was comprised of one common share of the Company and one-half of one warrant of the Company, with each full warrant entitling the holder to purchase one common share of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.36 for a period of two years.  Also in February 2017, the Company closed a second non-brokered private placement of 750,000 units of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.26 per unit for gross proceeds of Cdn$195,000.  Each such unit was comprised of one common share of the Company and one-half of one warrant of the Company, with each full warrant entitling the holder to purchase one common share of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.36 for a period of two years. 

In May 2017, the Company announced that Randgold had commenced exploration ground work on priority targets resulting from the JV Survey undertaken by Randgold as part of the Loncor Congo Joint Venture.

On June 19, 2018, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement of 850,000 common shares of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.20 per share for gross proceeds of Cdn$170,000.  Kondrat purchased 350,000 of the shares issued under this financing. 

On June 26, 2018, private placement and share swap transactions (the "Transactions") were completed with Resolute Mining Limited ("Resolute").  Pursuant to the private placement Transaction, the Company issued 13,000,000 common shares to Resolute at a price of Cdn$0.20 per share for gross proceeds of Cdn$2,600,000.  Also pursuant to the terms of the private placement Transaction, (a) for as long as Resolute holds at least 20% of the Company's issued and outstanding shares, Resolute will be entitled to designate a nominee to serve on the Company's board of directors, and (b) subject to the rules of the Toronto Stock Exchange, Resolute has been granted a pre-emptive right to maintain its pro rata equity ownership interest in Loncor following the completion by Loncor of any proposed equity offering.  Pursuant to the share swap Transaction, Resolute purchased 12,500,000 common shares of Loncor held by Kondrat in exchange for the issuance on or before July 16, 2018 by Resolute to Kondrat of Cdn$2,500,000 worth of Resolute ordinary shares (capped at a maximum of 3,000,000 Resolute shares). 

Also in June 2018, Loncor Subco acquired all of the outstanding shares of Navarro Resources SARL ("Navarro") and Devon Resources SARL ("Devon"), which held exploration permits covering ground in the Ngayu gold belt, thereby increasing Loncor's holdings in the Ngayu gold belt.  The consideration for the acquisition of Devon comprised the issuance by the Company of 500,000 common shares of the Company valued at Cdn$100,000, payment of US$75,000 in cash and payment of US$190,000 in satisfaction of an outstanding loan provided by Devon to the Company.  The purchase price for the acquisition of Navarro was US$300,000 which was paid for by the settlement of a US$300,000 loan provided by Loncor to Navarro.

In November 2018, the Company issued a press release providing an update on exploration activities undertaken by Randgold on Loncor's Ngayu project as part of the Loncor Congo Joint Venture. 

In May 2019, the Company issued a press release providing an update on exploration activities undertaken by Barrick Gold Corporation (through its subsidiary, Barrick Gold (Congo) SARL) ("Barrick") (Randgold and Barrick merged at the start of 2019) on Loncor's Ngayu project as part of the Loncor Congo Joint Venture.  The Company reported that drill targets had been delineated by Barrick on a number of prospects at Ngayu and that exploration by Barrick at Ngayu in 2019 had been focused on the 30 kilometre strike Imva fold area in the west of the Ngayu belt.

19


In June 2019, the Company appointed Mr. Zhengquan (Philip) Chen as a director of the Company.

In September 2019, the Company implemented a consolidation of its outstanding common shares (the "Share Consolidation"), whereby all of the outstanding common shares were consolidated on the basis of one common share of the Company for every 2 (two) existing common shares.  All amounts in this Form 20-F have been adjusted to reflect the Share Consolidation.

On September 27, 2019, the Company closed certain transactions provided for by the agreement (the "Kilo Agreement") entered into by the Company with Resolute (Treasury) Pty Ltd, Kilo Goldmines Ltd. and Kilo Goldmines Inc. (which is now named Loncor Kilo Inc.) ("Kilo Inc.").  As a result of these transactions, Kilo Inc. is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of Loncor, such that Loncor now holds, through Kilo Inc., Kilo Inc.'s mineral projects in the DRC.  Loncor issued to Arlington Group Asset Management Limited ("Arlington") 1,000,000 common shares of the Company as consideration for the services rendered by Arlington in negotiating and successfully concluding the Kilo Agreement.  Kilo Inc.'s properties in the DRC included a 71.25% interest in the Imbo Project in northeastern DRC (this 71.25% interest was subsequently increased to 84.68% in 2020; see below) which at the time of Kilo Inc.'s acquisition by the Company contained an inferred mineral resource of 1.675 million ounces of gold (20.78 million tonnes grading 2.5 g/t Au).  Kilo Inc. also had a joint venture with an affiliate of Barrick Gold Corporation for gold and associated minerals in respect of the Isiro exploration permits in northeastern DRC.  The Kilo Inc. mineral properties are located in the Ngayu gold belt near Loncor's existing Ngayu properties, and therefore consolidated ground for Loncor in the belt.

In October 2019, the Company announced the appointment of Peter Cowley as President of the Company and the appointment of Minecon Resources and Services Limited as geological consultants to manage exploration and development programs at Loncor's properties within the Ngayu greenstone belt which were outside of Loncor's joint venture with Barrick.  Mr. Cowley previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company from 2009 to 2015.  Mr. Cowley was also elected a director of the Company at the annual and special meeting of shareholders of the Company held on June 26, 2020.

In November 2019, the Company issued a press release providing an update on exploration activities undertaken by Barrick on Loncor's Ngayu properties as part of the Loncor Congo Joint Venture. 

In January 2020, the Company issued a press release providing an update on its activities at the Imbo Project. 

In February 2020, the Company issued a press release providing an update on its exploration activities at the Imbo Project and Barrick's exploration activities under the Loncor Congo Joint Venture. 

Also in February 2020, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement of 6,000,000 common shares of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.40 per share for gross proceeds of Cdn$2,400,000.  A total of 1,790,000 of the shares issued under this financing were purchased by certain insiders of the Company, including Kondrat who purchased 1,440,000 of the shares.   

In March 2020, the Company appointed John Barker as Vice President of Business Development for Loncor. 

Also in March 2020, the Company acquired an additional 5.04% interest in its subsidiary Adumbi Mining SARL ("Adumbi Holdco") pursuant to a private transaction with one of the former minority shareholders of Adumbi Holdco.  This acquisition increased Loncor's interest in Adumbi Holdco from 71.25% to 76.29% (the 71.25% interest had been acquired by the Company in September 2019 as part of the Kilo Agreement; see above).  Adumbi Holdco, which had changed its name from KGL Somituri SARL, holds six exploitation permits in the Ngayu greenstone belt including the Imbo Project exploitation permit.

20


In April 2020, Loncor announced a 49% increase in mineral resources at its Imbo Project.  Compared to the inferred mineral resources of 1.675 million ounces of gold (20.78 million tonnes grading 2.5 g/t Au) outlined in January 2014 by independent consultants Roscoe Postle Associates Inc. on three separate deposits, Adumbi, Kitenge and Manzako at Imbo, inferred mineral resources increased by 49% to 2.5 million ounces of gold (30.65 million tonnes grading 2.54 g/t Au), this increase coming from the Adumbi deposit.  This assessment was undertaken by the Company's independent geological consultants Minecon Resources and Services Limited. 

In May 2020, the Company issued a press release providing an update on its exploration activities at the Imbo Project and Barrick's exploration activities under the Loncor Congo Joint Venture. 

In June 2020, Loncor announced that Barrick had commenced its core drilling program on several priority gold targets within the Ngayu greenstone belt, as part of its joint venture with Loncor.

Also in June 2020, Loncor announced that it had entered into a new joint venture agreement (the "New Barrick JV") with Barrick for two exploitation permits held by Adumbi Holdco covering ground contiguous to the Company's Imva area within the Ngayu gold belt.  The terms of the New Barrick JV were similar to the ongoing Loncor Congo Joint Venture with Barrick. 

In August 2020, the Company completed a non-brokered private placement of 10,000,000 common shares of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.50 per share for gross proceeds of Cdn$5,000,000.  A total of 3,390,000 of the shares issued under this financing were purchased by certain insiders of the Company.

In September 2020 press releases, Loncor reported that:

- its common shares are now quoted on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange under the trading symbol LO51;

- its subsidiary, Adumbi Holdco, had been restructured as per the requirements of the OHADA (Organization for the Harmonization of Business Law in Africa) Uniform Act relating to commercial companies.  OHADA Uniform Acts provide for a system of common business laws which have been adopted by seventeen West and Central African countries, including the DRC.  The restructuring resulted in Loncor increasing its interest in Adumbi Holdco to 84.68%, minority shareholders holding 5.32% and the DRC 10%.  The DRC was allocated 10% in accordance with the requirements of the new DRC Mining Code enacted in 2018.  Also as a result of the restructuring, Adumbi Holdco now operates as "Adumbi Mining S.A." rather than Adumbi Mining SARL;

- recent exploration results had outlined a number of significant, undrilled mineralised trends at the Imbo Project.  The focus of exploration by Loncor during 2020 was along trend in the southeast of the Imbo Project from the Adumbi, Kitenge and Manzako deposits previously delineated in the northwest of the 122 square kilometre Imbo Project area.

In October 2020, the Company announced that drilling had commenced at the Imbo Project, with the objective of the drilling program being to outline additional mineral resources to the then current 2.5 million ounces (inferred mineral resources of 30.65 million tonnes grading 2.54 g/t Au) at the Adumbi, Kitenge and Manzako deposits.   

In a November 11, 2020 press release, Loncor announced that it has entered into two new agreements with its then joint venture partner, Barrick.  The ground covered by these agreements included a number of exploration targets already outlined by Barrick.  Total acreage under the various Barrick/Loncor joint ventures in the Ngayu gold belt in the northeast of the DRC totaled approximately 2,000 square kilometres as a result of these new agreements. 

21


In a November 23, 2020 press release, the Company provided an update on Barrick's exploration activities under the Loncor/Barrick joint ventures. 

On February 12, 2021, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement financing involving the issue of 11,500,000 units of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.50 per unit for gross proceeds of Cdn$5,750,000.  Each such unit consisted of one common share of the Company and one-half of one common share purchase warrant (each whole common share purchase warrant, an "A-Warrant") of the Company, with each A-Warrant entitling the holder thereof to acquire one common share of the Company at an exercise price of Cdn$0.75 for a period of 12 months following the closing date of the issuance of the said units.  A total of 1,400,000 of the units were purchased by certain insiders of the Company. 

On February 24, 2021, Loncor announced that geological mapping, soil geochemical, rock chips and channel sampling of old colonial trenches and artisanal workings had outlined four significant mineralised trends - Esio Wapi, Museveni, Mungo Iko and Paradis - approximately 8 to 10 kilometres southeast of the Adumbi deposit.  The focus of greenfields exploration by Loncor is at Imbo East, along trend to the southeast from the Adumbi, Kitenge and Manzako deposits previously delineated in the northwest of the 122 square kilometre project area. 

In press releases issued from November 2020 to November 2021, the Company announced drilling results from its drilling program at its Adumbi deposit. 

In April 2021, the Company announced a 44% increase in mineral resources at its Adumbi deposit in the Imbo Project.  Compared to the inferred mineral resource of 2.19 million ounces of gold (28.97 million tonnes grading 2.35 g/t Au) outlined in April 2020, further drilling increased the Adumbi inferred mineral resource by 44% to 3.15 million ounces of gold (41.316 million tonnes grading 2.37 g/t Au), constrained within a US$1,500 open pit shell.  This mineral resource assessment was undertaken by the Company's independent geological consultants Minecon Resources and Services Limited. 

In May 2021, the Company announced that Barrick informed Loncor that it will not be continuing exploration on the Loncor/Barrick joint venture ground. 

In June 2021, the Company changed its name from Loncor Resources Inc. to Loncor Gold Inc. to better brand Loncor's business as a gold exploration company. 

In July 2021, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement of 7,850,000 units of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.70 per unit for gross proceeds of Cdn$5,495,000.  Each such unit consisted of one common share of the Company and one-half of one common share purchase warrant (each whole common share purchase warrant, a "B-Warrant") of the Company, with each B-Warrant entitling the holder thereof to acquire one common share of the Company at an exercise price of Cdn$0.95 for a period of 12 months following the closing date of the issuance of the said units. 

In September 2021, the Company announced the appointment of Mr. John Barker as Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") of Loncor.  Mr. Barker, who was Vice President of Business Development of Loncor prior to his appointment as CEO, has 17 years' experience as a leading mining equity analyst including a period as Chairman of The Association of UK Mining Analysts.  Arnold Kondrat, Founder of Loncor and previous CEO, was appointed as the Company's Executive Chairman of the Board.

22


In November 2021, the Company announced an increase and upgrade in mineral resources at its Adumbi deposit in the Imbo Project.  Compared to the inferred mineral resource of 3.15 million ounces of gold (41.316 million tonnes grading 2.37 g/t Au) outlined in April 2021, the additional drilling information and the increased gold price used, contributed significantly to the increased mineral resources of the Adumbi deposit with improved confidence to 1.88 million ounces of gold (28.185 million tonnes grading 2.08 g/t gold) in the indicated category, and 1.78 million ounces of gold (20.828 million tonnes grading 2.65 g/t gold) in the inferred category, constrained within a US$1,600 per ounce optimized pit shell.  84.68% of these mineral resources are attributable to Loncor via its 84.68% interest in the Imbo Project.  This mineral resource assessment was undertaken by the Company's independent geological consultants Minecon Resources and Services Limited.

In December 2021, the Company announced the results of the Preliminary Economic Assessment ("PEA") for its Adumbi gold deposit.  The Adumbi PEA study was prepared for Loncor by a number of independent mining and engineering consultants led by New SENET (SENET), Johannesburg (Processing and Infrastructure) and Minecon Resources and Services Limited (Minecon), Accra (Mineral Resources, Mining and Environmental and Social) and Maelgwyn South Africa (MMSA), Johannesburg (Metallurgical test work), Knight Piésold and Senergy, Johannesburg (Power) and Epoch, Johannesburg (Tailings and Water Storage).  SENET undertook the financial and economic evaluation. 

In February 2022, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement of 5,650,000 units of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.55 per unit for gross proceeds of Cdn$3,107,500.  Each such unit consisted of one common share of the Company and one-half of one common share purchase warrant (each whole common share purchase warrant, a "C-Warrant") of the Company, with each C-Warrant entitling the holder thereof to acquire one common share of the Company at an exercise price of Cdn$0.75 for a period of 24 months following the closing date of the issuance of the said units.   

The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at: http://www.sec.gov. The Company's Internet address is www.loncor.com.

B.  Business Overview

General

Loncor is a Canadian gold exploration company focussed on the Ngayu Greenstone Gold Belt in the northeast of the DRC.  The Loncor team has over two decades of experience of operating in the DRC.  Loncor's growing resource base in the Ngayu Belt currently comprises the Imbo and Makapela Projects.  At the Imbo Project, the Adumbi deposit holds an indicated mineral resource of 1.88 million ounces of gold (28.185 million tonnes grading 2.08 g/t gold), and the Adumbi deposit and two neighbouring deposits hold an inferred mineral resource of 2.090 million ounces of gold (22.508 million tonnes grading 2.89 g/t Au), with 84.68% of these resources being attributable to Loncor.  Loncor has been carrying out a drilling program at the Adumbi deposit with the objective of outlining additional mineral resources.  The Makapela deposit (which is 100%-owned by Loncor and is located approximately 50 kilometres from the Imbo Project) has an indicated mineral resource of 614,200 ounces of gold (2.20 million tonnes grading 8.66 g/t Au) and an inferred mineral resource of 549,600 ounces of gold (3.22 million tonnes grading 5.30 g/t Au).   

In addition to the Ngayu properties, Loncor also has the North Kivu Project in the DRC, which is comprised of 46 exploration permits owned or controlled by Loncor, covering an area of approximately 13,000 square kilometres in North Kivu province located west of the city of Butembo.  All of the 46 North Kivu exploration permits are currently under force majeure due to the poor security situation in much of the North Kivu province. 

23


Additional information with respect to the Company's mineral properties can be found below in Item 4D of this Form 20-F under "Loncor's Mineral Properties".

Exploration Permits and Exploitation Permits under DRC Mining Law

Loncor holds or controls a number of exploration and exploitation permits covering ground in the DRC with respect to its exploration projects.  Under DRC mining law, an exploration permit entitles the holder thereof to the exclusive right, within the perimeter over which it is granted and for the term of its validity, to carry out mineral exploration work for mineral substances, substances for which the licence is granted and associated substances if an extension of the permit is obtained.  However, the holder of an exploration permit cannot commence work on the property without obtaining approval in advance of its mitigation and rehabilitation plan.  An exploration permit also entitles its holder to the right to obtain an exploitation permit for all or part of the mineral substances and associated substances, if applicable, to which the exploration permit or any extension thereto applies if the holder discovers a deposit which can be economically exploited.

Under DRC mining law, an exploitation permit (the Company's Adumbi deposit is covered by an exploitation permit - see "Loncor's Mineral Properties" below for additional information in respect of Adumbi) entitles the holder thereof to the exclusive right to carry out, within the perimeter over which it is granted and during its term of validity, exploration, development, construction and exploitation works in connection with the mineral substances for which the permit has been granted and associated substances if the holder has obtained an extension of the permit.  In addition, an exploitation permit entitles the holder to: (a) enter the exploitation perimeter to conduct mining operations; (b) build the installations and infrastructures required for mining exploitation; (c) use the water and wood within the mining perimeter for the requirements of the mining exploitation, provided that the requirements set forth in the environmental impact study and the environmental management plan of the project are complied with; (d) use, transport and freely sell the holder's products originating from within the exploitation perimeter; (e) proceed with concentration, metallurgical or technical treatment operations, as well as the transformation of the mineral substances extracted from the exploitation perimeter; and (f) proceed to carry out works to extend the mine.  Without an exploitation permit, the holder of an exploration permit may not conduct exploitation work on the perimeter covered by the exploration permit.  So long as a perimeter is covered by an exploitation permit, no other application for a mining or quarry right for all or part of the same perimeter can be processed.

Specialized Skill and Knowledge

Management of the Company is comprised of a team of individuals who have extensive expertise and experience in the mineral exploration industry (including, in particular, extensive expertise and experience in operating mineral exploration programs in the DRC) and exploration finance and are complemented by an experienced board of directors.  See Item 6A of this Form 20-F, "Directors and Senior Management".

Competitive Conditions

The Company competes with other mineral exploration and mining companies for mineral properties, joint venture partners, equipment and supplies, qualified personnel and exploration and development capital.  See Item 3D of this Form 20-F, "Risk Factors".

24


Environmental Protection

The current and future operations of the Company are subject to laws and regulations governing exploration, development, tenure, production, taxes, labour standards, occupational health, waste disposal, greenhouse gas emissions, protection and remediation of the environment, reclamation, mine safety, toxic substances and other matters.  Specifically, the Company's projects are subject to an array of applicable norms, standards, laws and regulations.  The Company holds all necessary licenses, permits and registrations, including environmental licenses and water permits, to carry out its planned current exploration activities at its projects. 

Compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations increases costs and may cause delays in planning, designing, drilling and developing the Company's projects.  The Company attempts to diligently apply technically proven and economically feasible measures to advance protection of the environment throughout the exploration and development process, however it is often impossible to anticipate and mitigate all administrative delays.

Foreign Operations

The Company's mineral properties are located only in the DRC and its operations are substantially carried out in that country.  See Item 3D of this Form 20-F, "Risk Factors".

The Loncor Foundation

In early 2010, the Company established the Loncor Foundation, a registered charity in the DRC, funded by the Company with the goal of improving the quality of life and opportunities for communities near the Company's exploration projects.  In meetings and discussions with community representatives, it was determined that the Loncor Foundation would focus primarily on health, education and local infrastructure projects.  Based on this advice, the Loncor Foundation initiated a number of community projects near the Yindi and Makapela prospects at the Ngayu project and the Manguredjipa prospect at the North Kivu project. These included the construction of a new primary school for 400 students at Yindi.  The Loncor Foundation also donated text and exercise books for teachers and students in 2011 and 2012 and made a donation of 40 hospital beds to two medical clinics in the Yindi area.  Loncor Foundation projects at Manguredjipa have included financial support for a community electrification project and the construction of six showers and latrines at the Manguredjipa General Hospital, as well as the donation of a motorbike for use by medical staff at the hospital.

The primary focus of the Loncor Foundation in 2012 was the construction of the Bole Bole medical clinic near Makapela.  Also in 2012, the Foundation initiated a program to partially fund the salaries of 12 teachers at the Yindi primary school which resulted in reduced tuition costs for parents and increased enrollment at the school.  During 2013, the Loncor Foundation also repaired bridges on the road between Yindi and Makapela and continued to fund teachers' salaries at the Yindi primary school and partially fund operations at the Bole Bole medical clinic.  The Foundation's work was suspended in 2014 having regard to the Company's financial situation and the need to conserve funds.  The Company intends to restart the activities of the Loncor Foundation in 2022.

C.  Organizational Structure

The following chart illustrates the relationship between Loncor and its significant subsidiaries.  The jurisdiction of incorporation of each such subsidiary and the percentage of voting securities beneficially owned, or controlled or directed, directly or indirectly, by Loncor, is shown in brackets in the last line of each of the boxes of the chart. 

25


D.  Property, Plants and Equipment

The Company does not have any material tangible fixed assets. 

Loncor's Mineral Properties

Loncor is a Canadian gold exploration company focussed on the Ngayu Greenstone Gold Belt in the northeast of the DRC.  The Loncor team has over two decades of experience of operating in the DRC.  Loncor's growing resource base in the Ngayu Belt currently comprises the Imbo and Makapela Projects.  At the Imbo Project, the Adumbi deposit holds an indicated mineral resource of 1.88 million ounces of gold (28.185 million tonnes grading 2.08 g/t gold), and the Adumbi deposit and two neighbouring deposits hold an inferred mineral resource of 2.090 million ounces of gold (22.508 million tonnes grading 2.89 g/t Au), with 84.68% of these resources being attributable to Loncor.  Loncor has been carrying out a drilling program at the Adumbi deposit with the objective of outlining additional mineral resources.  The Makapela deposit (which is 100%-owned by Loncor and is located approximately 50 kilometres from the Imbo Project) has an indicated mineral resource of 614,200 ounces of gold (2.20 million tonnes grading 8.66 g/t Au) and an inferred mineral resource of 549,600 ounces of gold (3.22 million tonnes grading 5.30 g/t Au). 

26


In addition to the Ngayu properties, Loncor also has the North Kivu Project in the DRC, which is comprised of 46 exploration permits owned or controlled by Loncor, covering an area of approximately 13,000 square kilometres in North Kivu province located west of the city of Butembo.  All of the 46 North Kivu exploration permits are currently under force majeure due to the poor security situation in much of the North Kivu province. 

The following table summarizes the Company's mineral resources for all its properties(1) as of December 31, 2021: 

  Indicated Mineral Resources Inferred Mineral Resources
Property
 
Tonnage
(tonnes)
Grade
(g/t Au)
Contained
Gold
(ounces)
Attributable
Gold (2)
(ounces)
Tonnage
(tonnes)
Grade
(g/t Au)
Contained
Gold
(ounces)
Attributable
Gold (2)
(ounces)
Imbo Project 28,185,000 2.08 1,883,000 1,594,524 22,508,000 2.89 2,090,000 1,769,812
Makapela Deposit 2,205,000 8.66 614,200 614,200 3,223,000 5.30 549,600 549,600
Total: 30,390,000 2.56 2,497,200 2,208,724 25,731,000 3.19 2,639,600 2,319,412

(1) Numbers in the table may not add up due to rounding.  Both the Imbo Project and the Makapela deposit are in the northeast of the DRC.  The Makapela deposit is located approximately 50 kilometres from the Imbo Project.  Loncor does not have any measured mineral resources (indicated and inferred mineral resources only). Mineral resources are measured in situ.

(2) A total of 84.68% of the Imbo Project mineral resources are attributable to Loncor via its 84.68% interest in the Imbo Project.  The Makepala deposit is 100%-owned by the Company.

Changes in Imbo Project Mineral Resources Since Fiscal 2020

 

The Imbo Project is the Company’s material project.  As of December 31, 2020, the Imbo Project’s mineral resources consisted of an inferred mineral resource of 2,503,000 ounces of gold (30,650,000 tonnes grading 2.54 g/t Au).  The Imbo Project’s total mineral resources as of December 31, 2021 as set out in the above table represent a 58.7% increase from the total mineral resources of the Imbo Project as of December 31, 2020.  Mineral resources for December 31, 2020 were determined in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”), which were permitted to be disclosed pursuant to Industry Guide 7 prior to Regulation S-K 1300 becoming applicable to the Company.  The book value of the Imbo Project as of December 31, 2021, as reflected in the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements for fiscal 2021, was US$9,792,812. 

Imbo Project: Adumbi Deposit

Technical Report

The following is mainly a reproduction of the summary from the technical report of Minecon Resources and Services Limited (“Minecon”) entitled "Technical Report Summary on the Mineral Resources of the Imbo Project in the Democratic Republic of the Congo" (the "Technical Report").  The Technical Report is incorporated by reference into this Form 20-F as Exhibit 15.4.  Immediately following this summary are several additional maps in respect of the Imbo Project taken from the Technical Report. Minecon is not an affiliate of the Company.

Introduction

Minecon Resources and Services Limited (Minecon) was engaged by Loncor Gold Inc. (Loncor) to prepare an independent Technical Report Summary (TRS) with respect to Loncor's Imbo Project in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).  The purpose of this TRS is to support the inclusion of the Imbo Project's Mineral Resource estimates in Loncor's Form 20-F annual report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).  This TRS conforms to the SEC's Modernized Property Disclosure Requirements for Mining Registrants as described in Subpart 229.1300 of Regulation S-K, Disclosure by Registrants Engaged in Mining Operations (S-K 1300) (including Item 601 (b)(96) Technical Report Summary). 

27


Property Description and Location

Loncor's Imbo Project is located in the Mambasa District of the Ituri Province, in the northeastern region of the DRC, 260 km west of Bunia, the capital of the Ituri Province, and 225 km northwest of the city of Beni.  The Adumbi base camp within the Imbo exploitation permit area is located at latitude 1º 43' 58.76" N and longitude 27º 52' 4.01" E or 596,522 m E and 191,570 m N (WGS 84 UTM Zone 35N) (see Figure 1.1).

The Imbo Project covers Exploitation Permit Number 9691, has a total area of 122 km2 and encompasses the known gold mineral deposits of Adumbi, Kitenge and Manzako and several prospects including Canal, Bagbaie, Adumbi West, Amuango, Monde Arabe, Vatican and Imbo East. Adumbi is located approximately 220 km by air southwest from the large operating gold mine of Kibali, operated by Barrick Gold, which in 2020 produced 808,134 oz.

Figure 1.1: Location of the Imbo Project in East Africa

Mineral Rights and Land Ownership

Loncor is a publicly listed Canadian gold exploration company and holds 84.68 % interest in the Imbo Project through its subsidiary Adumbi Mining S.A., with the minority shareholders holding 15.32 % (including the 10 % free-carried interest held by the Government of the DRC).  The Imbo exploitation permit is valid until February 2039.

Minecon relied on a letter on land tenure, licences, and permits dated June 8, 2020, from MBM-Conseil, one of the leading firms practising mining law in the DRC.  The Imbo Project comprises a Permis d'Exploitation (PE 9691) or Exploitation Licence held by Adumbi Mining S.A., granted for the period February 23, 2009, to February 22, 2039 (and renewable for an additional 15 years), for gold and diamonds and covering a total of 122 km2.

28


Under an agreement signed in April 2010 with the minority partners of Adumbi Mining S.A., Loncor agreed to finance all the activities of Adumbi Mining S.A., until the filing of a bankable feasibility study, by way of loans which bear interest at a rate of 5% per annum. Within thirty days of the receipt of a bankable feasibility study, the minority partners may collectively elect to exchange their equity participation for either a 2% net smelter royalty or a 1% net smelter royalty plus an amount equal to €2/oz of Proven Ore Reserves.

The DRC 2018 Mining Code imposes a royalty tax payable to the State on the sale of minerals, at a rate of 3.5% for precious metals.

Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Physiography and Infrastructure

Located approximately 225 km by air southeast of the Adumbi deposit, Beni is the nearest major population centre to the Imbo Project and has a population of approximately 230,000. Loncor maintains an administrative office in Beni.  The city has a lateritic airstrip with scheduled internal flights to other towns in DRC such as Goma, Bunia, Isiro, Kisangani and Kinshasa.  The Isiro airstrip is approximately 200 km by lateritic road to the Imbo Project. From Beni, the Imbo Project is accessible via 322 km of lateritic road to Nia-Nia (where there is a lateritic airstrip), then to Village 47 (47 km north of Nia-Nia) and then via 7 km of lateritic roads to the Adumbi base camp.

The nearest international airport is located at Entebbe in western Uganda and linked by 440 km of paved road to the Kasindi Uganda-DRC border, followed by 80 km of unpaved lateritic roads to Beni. Entebbe has international scheduled flights to South Africa, Europe and Asia and is also linked to other African countries as well as the in-country towns of Kinshasa and Lubumbashi via Nairobi (Kenya).

The climate in the Imbo area is typically tropical and is characterised by a long wet season and short dry season of up to three months from mid-December to mid-March. The average annual rainfall is approximately 2,000 mm to 2,500 mm, with the highest rainfall generally occurring in October. Temperatures are uniformly high throughout the year, and there is little diurnal variability, varying between 19 °C and 23 °C, with daily lows and highs of 16 °C and 33 °C, respectively. Humidity is high throughout the year (75 % to 99 %).

The Imbo Project is located in the Ituri tropical rainforest within the upper reaches of the Congo River Basin. The project area topographically consists of an undulating terrain that varies from approximately 600 m above sea level to 800 m above sea level. Most of the surface area is covered with dense evergreen forests with a closed canopy; however, the hills tend to have relatively steep slopes, and the valley floors within the areas of the linear hills are relatively narrow.

The Imbo Project is drained by numerous creeks and streams, which flow into the Upper Ituri river and its main tributaries: the Epulu, Nepoko, Nduye, Lenda, Ebiena, and Ngayu rivers, which form part of the upper reaches of the Congo River Basin. The closest hydroelectric power station is situated near Kisangani together with the hydroelectric stations supplying power to Barrick Gold/AngloGold Ashanti's Kibali Gold Mine. The towns of Isiro and Beni are potential sources of skilled manpower, and there is sufficient local unskilled manpower in the surroundings of Adumbi.

Given its exploration stage of development, there is limited infrastructure currently available at Adumbi. Presently, infrastructure is composed of an exploration camp (the Adumbi base camp) with associated helicopter landing pad, administration building, accommodation buildings and facilities, field office, core logging and storage facilities, diesel generators and solar power generation, and a sample preparation laboratory.

29


Exploration History

Belgian prospectors were the first to discover gold on the Imbo Project in the early 1900s, with gold production focusing on alluvial deposits until the late 1930s.  Primary gold mineralisation was later discovered in the bedrock of the alluvial zones and was exploited in shallow pits and trenches. This was later followed by mining from deep trenches and underground galleries.  From the mid-1970s to mid-1980s, the French Geological Survey (BRGM) undertook geological investigations of the Imbo Project area.

The mining rights for the mineral concessions in the Imbo Project area were initially held by Société Internationale Forestière et Minière du Congo (FORMINIÈRE or FRM) from the 1920s to the late 1950s. The Belgian colonial state was co-owner of a 50 % stake in FRM, with the remainder held by American interests.  The Société Minière de la Tele (SMT), a subsidiary of FRM, oversaw development and exploitation. Following political independence in 1960, ownership has changed hands multiple times.

Highlights of the reported historical exploration include the following:

  • 1980 to 1981: BRGM mapped and sampled the Adumbi and Bagbaie deposits on surface and in the historical underground openings. BRGM also drilled three holes at Adumbi and confirmed that (i) mineralisation extended at depth below the water table, (ii) other mineralised zones, parallel to the main one, also existed, and (iii) gold at depth was associated with sulphides.
  • 1988: Bugeco International (Bugeco) produced a report on the property entitled "Gold Potential in the Ngayu Mining District Haut Zaire: the Adumbi and Yindi Old Mines".
  • 2009: Kilo acquired the property and carried out extensive exploration activities including major drilling campaigns from 2010.
  • By November 2013, Kilo had completed 167 diamond drillholes totalling 35,400 m on the Imbo Project.
  • 2014: An independent engineering group Roscoe Postle Associates Inc. (RPA) completed technical studies, outlined an Inferred mineral resource, and made various technical recommendations to be executed by Kilo.
  • 2014 to 2017: Kilo completed 63 drillholes totalling approximately 8,900 m to test gold-in-soil and magnetic anomalies at the Adumbi South, Adumbi West and Kitenge Extension targets.
  • 2017: Four deeper core holes were drilled below the previously outlined RPA Inferred resource over a strike length of 400 m and to a maximum depth of 450 m below surface. All four holes intersected significant gold mineralisation in terms of widths and grades.
  • 2018 to 2019: Negligible exploration groundwork was undertaken by Kilo due to financial constraints.
  • In September 2019, Loncor initially acquired a 71.25% interest in the Imbo Project, which was subsequently increased to 84.68 % in 2020.
  • April 2020: An Inferred mineral resource of 2.19 Moz (28.97 Mt at 2.35 g/t Au) was determined, constrained within a US$1,500/oz pit shell at Adumbi.
  • October 2020: Loncor commenced a core drilling programme at Adumbi to increase and upgrade mineral resources within a US$1,600/oz open-pit shell and at depth. A total of 24 core holes (10,071 m) were drilled during this programme as part of the study.

30


Geological Setting and Gold Mineralisation

The Adumbi gold deposit is found within the Ngayu Archean greenstone belt, one of a number of Archean-aged, granite-greenstone belts that extend from northern Tanzania into northeastern DRC and then into the Central African Republic.  The greenstone belt terrain in northeastern DRC has a number of major gold belts including Moto (Kibali), Kilo, Mambasa, Ngayu and Isiro.

The majority of the gold occurrences within the Ngayu belt are located close to the contact of the Banded Ironstone Formation (BIF).  Historically, only two deposits were exploited on any significant scale, namely Yindi and Adumbi.  Styles of gold mineralisation within the Ngayu belt include shears within the BIF or on the BIF contacts, disseminated mineralisation, and shears within basalts and schists, resulting in discrete auriferous gold veins.  Artisanal mining of weathered gold mineralisation preserved as elluvial or colluvial material is widespread throughout the belt.

Within the Imbo Project area, there is a strong association between gold mineralisation and the presence of the BIF, with the BIF constituting the host rock (e.g., Adumbi) or forming a significant part of the local stratigraphy in the Imbo Project area.  The BIF forms both physical and chemical traps for mineralising hydrothermal fluids.  The iron-rich BIF is a chemically reactive rock, the main interaction with hydrothermal fluids involving the reduction of magnetite to pyrite, resulting in the precipitation of gold. Mineralisation on the Imbo Project (PE9691) is known to occur at Bagbaie (referred to as Adumbi North), Adumbi, Kitenge, Manzako, Monde Arabe, Maiepunji and Vatican.

Adumbi is currently the most explored deposit within the Imbo Project. Adumbi forms a topographic high (Adumbi Hill) and incorporates the Canal prospect, which is the southeastern continuation of Adumbi. Based on examined drillholes, the rocks at Adumbi mainly comprise a subvertical sequence of metamorphosed clastic sediments (pelites, siltstones and greywacke) interbedded with units of BIF of varying width.  The grade of metamorphism is probably lower greenschist facies, and the clastic units are petrographically classified as schists.  Foliation is usually clearly defined in hand specimens although sedimentary features such as bedding are frequently preserved.

The Adumbi deposit displays five distinct geological domains with the BIF unit attaining a thickness of up to 130 m in the central part.  There is a higher-grade zone of gold mineralisation termed the "replaced rock zone" (RP zone) associated with alteration and structural deformation that has completely destroyed the primary host lithological fabric.  The RP zone occurs in the lower part of the Upper BIF package and in the Lower BIF package, and transgresses the Carbonaceous Marker, located between the Upper and Lower BIF packages, both along strike and down dip.  The geological interpretation from the Loncor drill intersections demonstrates that the mineralised BIF increases in thickness with depth and thus confirms the existence of significant underground potential at Adumbi below the mineral resources within the open-pit shell.

The detailed logging of the mineralised cores indicated a direct relationship between gold values and the percentage of sulphide mineralisation and intensity of silicification. In general, pyrite is the dominant sulphide followed by pyrrhotite, then arsenopyrite.  When pyrite and pyrrhotite are associated with arsenopyrite, the gold values are very significant, compared to when pyrite is associated with pyrrhotite only.  Silica is associated with the highest degree of hydrothermal alteration within the zones and serves as a marker of mineralisation; however, without sulphides, the gold values are insignificant. Specks of visible gold are occasionally found, generally within fractures and are present in white to grey, glassy, weak to moderately brecciated quartz veins.

31


Deposit Types

Gold deposits within the Imbo Project are associated with the globally important Neo-Archean orogenic gold deposits, examples of which are found in most Neo-Archean cratons around the world. Gold mineralisation is associated with the epigenetic mesothermal style of mineralisation. This style of mineralisation is typical of gold deposits in Neo-Archean greenstone terranes and is generally associated with regionally metamorphosed rocks that have experienced a long history of thermal and deformational events. These deposits are invariably structurally controlled.

Mineralisation in this environment is commonly of the fracture and vein type in brittle fracture to ductile dislocation zones.  At the Adumbi deposit, the gold mineralisation is generally associated with quartz and quartz-carbonate-pyrite ± pyrrhotite ± arsenopyrite veins in a BIF horizon.

Examples of similar type BIF hosted gold deposits to Adumbi include Geita in Tanzania, Kibali in northeastern DRC, Tasiast in Mauritania, Homestake (U.S.A.), Lupin (Canada) and Moro Velho in Brazil.

Exploration

The Imbo Project has been explored since the early 1900s by Belgian prospectors and more recently by Kilo and then Loncor. During the period 2010 to 2012, 44 trenches totalling 4,753 m were excavated over the Adumbi, Kitenge and Manzako targets.  Accessible adits and underground workings were also geologically mapped and sampled at Adumbi; however, those at Kitenge and Manzako were not accessible. In all, a total of 907 m was sampled.

By November 2013, Kilo had completed 167 diamond drillholes totalling 35,400 m on the Imbo Project. Kilo outsourced sample preparation and analysis to independent assayers ALS Geochemistry (ALS).  Drill core sample preparation was conducted at ALS Mwanza (Tanzania) from 2010 to August 2011, and then at an on-site purpose-built container facility supplied and managed by ALS Minerals. Analyses were undertaken by ALS Johannesburg (South Africa) and ALS Vancouver (Canada).

In February 2014, independent consultants RPA completed an independent NI 43-101 technical report on the Imbo Project and estimated 1.675 Moz (20.78 Mt grading 2.5 g/t Au) of Inferred Mineral Resources on the three separate deposits of Adumbi, Kitenge and Manzako.

RPA made several recommendations on Adumbi, which were addressed in subsequent exploration programmes. In September 2020, Loncor signed a management service agreement with Minecon to manage the infill and extension drilling programme on the Adumbi deposit.

Drilling

The more recent drilling on the Imbo Project has been carried out by Kilo and then Loncor using contract drilling companies.  The drilling programmes have been carried out in phases:

  • 2010 to 2013 (Kilo)
  • 2014 to 2017 (Kilo)
  • 2020 to 2021 (Loncor)

As of November 15, 2013, Kilo had completed 167 diamond drillholes totalling 35,400 m on the Imbo Project.  During the 2014 to 2017 drilling programme, 63 drillholes totalling 8,900 m were drilled.

32


The 2020 to 2021 drilling campaign was carried out by Orezone Drilling and a total of 24 holes totalling 10,071.44 m were drilled at Adumbi.  The drill core was systematically logged and photographed before cutting and sampling. Reflex Act II orientation survey equipment was used for core orientation at every run of 3 m in competent material to aid in structural measurements. Structural measurements taken during the routine logging were from bedding, foliation, and quartz veins whereas structural measurements from lithological contacts, joints and shears were captured in detail under a separate geotechnical logging programme.

Sample Preparation, Analyses and Security

During the 2014 to 2017 exploration activity, sample preparation and analyses were outsourced to the SGS laboratory in Mwanza, Tanzania (which is independent of Loncor).  The SGS laboratory operates a quality system that is accredited in accordance with ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and SANAS (South African National Accreditation System).  The SGS laboratory acted as an umpire laboratory even while ALS Chemex was the principal laboratory; hence, correlational studies between the two laboratories have been undertaken.

As part of the 2020 to 2021 drilling programme, Loncor started using the on-site sample preparation laboratory.  This has helped with the enforcement of stricter QA/QC policing on the analytical laboratory. Laboratory procedures have been documented and reviewed by Minecon senior management, and internal quality control measures have been taken. Based on the documentation and discussions with the laboratory management, Minecon's senior management does not have any concerns regarding the sample preparation for all Loncor samples.

Sample pulps are sent for analyses to SGS Mwanza, which serves as the primary laboratory. SGS is internationally accredited and utilises conventional sample preparation, sample analysis and associated quality control protocols.  Once the samples are received at the SGS laboratory, the samples go through checking and reconciliation procedures, followed by the SGS sample preparation procedure (SGS Code PRP87).

Drill core, trench, adit, pit, rock chip and channel samples were analysed for gold at the SGS Mwanza laboratory using fire assay (FA) with flame atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) to measure the gold (SGS Code FAA505), and the analyses were carried out on 50 g aliquots.  The effective range for FAA505 is 0.01 ppm Au to 100 ppm Au.  In addition, check assays were carried out by the screen fire assay method to verify higher-grade sample assays obtained by fire assay. Internationally recognised standards and blanks were inserted at the Adumbi sample preparation laboratory as part of internal QA/QC analytical procedures.

Additional information with respect to the internal controls that the Company uses in its exploration and mineral resource estimation efforts is included in sections 11 and 12 of the Technical Report, which is incorporated by reference into this Form 20-F as Exhibit 15.4.

Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing

Metallurgical test work (comminution and gold recovery) was performed by Maelgwyn Mineral Services Laboratory in Johannesburg on the Adumbi mineralised samples to evaluate the process route required to obtain the highest gold recoveries that can be achieved.  Table 1.1 shows a summary of the Adumbi metallurgical test work results.

33


Table 1.1: Adumbi Metallurgical Test Work Results

Parameters Unit Oxide Transition Fresh
Bond Rod Work Index kWh/t 12.7 13.6 14.6
Bond Ball Work Index kWh/t 11.8 13.7 14.2
Abrasion Index   0.19 0.25 0.34
Diagnostic Leach Carbon in Leach (CIL) Recovery % 90.76 87.53 89.9

The average diagnostic leach recovery for the fresh (sulphide) material was the weighted mean of the RP and BIF lithologies relative to the volume of their occurrence (20% RP:80% BIF) in the fresh material. Diagnostic leach recoveries of 80.10% for RP and 92.37% for BIF were realised for the fresh (sulphide) material.

Comminution results indicated that both the oxide and transition material are medium hard while the fresh material indicated that it is slightly hard.

In order to optimise the gold recovery, further test work was conducted on the fresh and transition material whereby gravity was followed by flotation on the gravity tails.  The results showed that most of the gold can be floated into float concentrates as summarised in Table.

Table 1.2: Flotation Results

Sample ID Rougher Concentrate
Gold Sulphur
Grade (g/t) Recovery (%) Grade (%) Recovery (%)
Fresh - RP 9.57 95.06 25.07 93.03
Fresh - BIF 8.30 87.16 17.90 85.13
Transition 11.82 81.31 15.80 95.52

The concentrate samples that were generated were not sufficient to enable further processing routes such as the following:

  • Fine milling followed by leaching with oxygen addition
  • Fine milling followed by partial oxidation using high shear reactors and leaching
  • Albion process
  • Pressure oxidation
  • Bio leaching
  • Roasting

These recovery processes will be investigated during the next phase of the project to optimise the gold recovery in the transition and fresh ore types.

Mineral Resources

During Q3 of 2021, Loncor commissioned Minecon to re-evaluate and quantify the exploration work including drilling undertaken during the period 2020 to 2021.  This has resulted in Minecon updating the Mineral Resource estimate of Adumbi.  This follows a previous mineral resource estimate undertaken by Minecon in April 2021.

34


Compared to the Inferred Mineral Resource of 3.15 Moz of gold (41.316 Mt grading 2.37 g/t Au) outlined in April 2021 (see Loncor press release dated April 27, 2021), the additional drilling information and the increased gold price have contributed significantly to the increased mineral resources of the Adumbi deposit with improved confidence to 1.88 Moz (28.185 Mt grading 2.08 g/t Au) of gold in the Indicated category and 1.78 Moz (20.828 Mt grading 2.65 g/t Au) of gold in the Inferred category.

Table 1.3 summarises the Adumbi Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources based on an in-situ block cut-off grade at a 0.52 g/t Au for oxide, 0.57 g/t Au for transition and 0.63 g/t Au for fresh material, and constrained within a US$1,600/oz optimised pit shell.  A total of 84.68% of the Adumbi mineral resources are attributable to Loncor via its 84.68 % interest in the Imbo Project.

Table 1.3: Adumbi Deposit Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources (as of December 31, 2021)

Mineral Resource
Category
Tonnage
(t)
Grade
(g/t Au)
Contained Gold
(oz)
Indicated 28,185,000 2.08 1,883,000
Inferred 20,828,000 2.65 1,777,000
NOTES:
1. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.
2. Numbers might not add up due to rounding.

Table 1.4 summarises the Adumbi Indicated and Inferred category mineral resources in terms of material type.

Table 1.4: Adumbi Mineral Resources by Material Type (as of December 31, 2021)

Material Type Indicated Mineral Resource Inferred Mineral Resource
Tonnage
(t)
Grade
(g/t Au)
Contained
Gold

(oz)
Tonnage
(t)
Grade
(g/t Au)
Contained
Gold

(oz)
Oxide 3,169,000 2.05 208,000 458,000 3.39 49,000
Transition 3,401,000 2.51 274,000 280,000 2.74 24,000
Fresh (Sulphide) 21,614,000 2.02 1,400,000 20,089,000 2.64 1,703,000
TOTAL 28,185,000 2.08 1,883,000 20,828,000 2.65 1,777,000
NOTES:
1. Mineral resources were estimated at a block cut-off grade of 0.52 g/t Au for oxide, 0.57 g/t Au for transition and 0.63 g/t Au for fresh material constrained by a Whittle pit. 
2. Mineral Resources for Adumbi were estimated using a long-term gold price of US$1,600/oz.
3. A minimum mining width of 32 m horizontal was used.
4. A maximum of 4 m internal waste was used.
5. Adumbi bulk densities of 2.45 for oxide, 2.82 for transition and 3.05 for fresh rock were used.
6. High gold assays were capped at 18 g/t Au for Adumbi, prior to compositing at 2 m intervals.
7. Numbers might not add up due to rounding.

 

35


The Imbo Project Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resource for the combined Adumbi, Manzako and Kitenge deposits now respectively totals 1.88 Moz of gold (28.19 Mt grading 2.08 g/t Au) and 2.09 Moz of gold (22.50 Mt grading 2.89 g/t Au). The total Inferred Resource is summarised in Table 1.5.

Table 1.5: Inferred Mineral Resource for the Imbo Project (as of December 31, 2021)

Deposit Tonnage
(t)
Grade
(g/t Au)
Contained Gold
(oz)
Adumbi 20,828,000 2.65 1,777,000
Kitenge 910,000 6.60 191,000
Manzako 770,000 5.00 122,000
TOTAL 22,508,000 2.89 2,090,000
NOTES:
1. Mineral resources were estimated at a block cut-off grade of 0.52 g/t Au for oxide, 0.57 g/t Au for transition and 0.63 g/t Au for fresh material constrained by a Whittle pit. 
2. Mineral Resources for Adumbi were estimated using a long-term gold price of US$1,600/oz.
3. A minimum mining width of 32 m horizontal was used.
4. A maximum of 4 m internal waste was used.
5. Adumbi bulk densities of 2.45 for oxide, 2.82 for transition and 3.05 for fresh rock were used. For Kitenge and Manzako, reference is made to the RPA Technical Report, where bulk densities of 1.7 for oxide, 2.2 for transition and 2.7 for sulphide material were used.
6. High gold assays were capped at 18 g/t Au for Adumbi, prior to compositing at 2 m intervals. For Kitenge and Manzako, reference is made to the RPA Technical Report where assays were capped at 50 g/t Au, prior to compositing at 2 m intervals.
7. Estimated historical mining has been removed.
8. Numbers might not add up due to rounding.

A total of 84.68% of the Imbo Project mineral resources are attributable to Loncor via its 84.68% interest in the Imbo Project.

Mineral Inventory

The Mineral Inventory Statement is reported in accordance with the SEC's S-K 1300 requirements as well as NI 43-101 requirements.

Table shows a summary of the Adumbi Mineral Inventory for the various material types (oxide, transition and fresh) contained within the Adumbi practical pit designs.

The following summarises the pit optimisation assumptions and parameters used to constrain the depth extent of the geological model to generate the mineral inventory of the open pit for the Adumbi deposit:

  • A gold price of US$1,600/oz
  • A block size of 16 m × 16 m × 8 m
  • A 32 m minimum mining width and a maximum of 4 m of internal waste was applied
  • A mining dilution of 100% of the tonnes at 95% of the grade
  • An ultimate slope angle of 45°
  • An average mining cost of US$3.29/t mined
  • Metallurgical recoveries of 91% for oxide, 88% for transition and 90% for fresh
  • An average general and administration (G&A) cost of US$4.20/t
  • Mineral resources were estimated at a block cut-off grade of 0.52 g/t Au for oxide, 0.57 g/t Au for transition and 0.63 g/t Au for fresh materials, constrained by a US$1,600/oz optimised pit shell
  • Transport of gold and refining costs equivalent to 4.5% of the gold price

36


The results from the Adumbi Whittle pit optimisation for the gold price of US$1,600/oz allowed for the selection of the optimised final pit shell (Pit Shell 40) based on the maximum undiscounted cash flow for the practical pit design. The practical pit designs were prepared using the optimised pit shells as templates.  The relevant Whittle pit shells were exported from the GEMS to Surpac software, where the practical pit designs were prepared.  The practical pit design incorporates the ramps together with the appropriate inter-ramp slope angles.  No practical pit design was prepared for the Final Pit; hence, the optimised pit shell (Pit 40) was used to define Cut 3 for the blocks to be scheduled.

The Qualified Person (QP) has performed an independent verification of the block model tonnage and grade, and in the QP's opinion, the process has been carried out to industry standards.

Additional information with respect to the assumptions and criteria relating to the Company’s mineral resource estimation is included in section 14 of the Technical Report, which is incorporated by reference into this Form 20-F as Exhibit 15.4.

Adjacent Properties

In addition to the Imbo Project, there have been other mineral exploration activities in the Ngayu Greenstone Belt in recent times, and mineral resources have been defined within the belt.  Since 2010, Loncor has been the largest permit holder in the Ngayu belt and has been exploring a number of prospects on its own since 2010 or in joint venture with Barrick Gold Congo SARL (formerly Randgold Resources Congo SARL) (Barrick Gold) from 2016 to 2021.

Loncor undertook exploration over priority target areas at Yindi, Makapela, Itali, Matete, Nagasa, Mondarabe, Anguluku and Adumbi West prospects with airborne magnetic and radiometric surveys, geological mapping, stream sediment sampling, soil and rock sampling, trenching, augering and ground geophysical surveys.  During the period 2010 to 2013, Loncor undertook drilling programmes on a number of prospects in Ngayu and outlined mineral resources at Makapela in the west of the belt. At Makapela, a total of 56 core holes (18,091 m) were completed in the vicinity of the Main and North pits, and 15 holes (3,594 m) were drilled at nearby Sele Sele.  In April 2013, Loncor announced mineral resource estimates for Makapela with an Indicated Mineral Resource of 0.61 Moz of gold (2.20 Mt grading at 8.66 g/t Au) and an Inferred Mineral Resource of 0.55 Moz of gold (3.22 Mt grading at 5.30 g/t Au). The deposit at Makapela is open down plunge and along strike. 

Besides Makapela, Loncor drilled other prospects, and significant intersections were obtained at Yindi (21.3 m grading 3.3 g/t Au, 24.0 m grading 1.5 g/t Au and 10.3 m grading 4.1 g/t Au) and at Itali (38.82 m at 2.66 g/t Au, 14.70 m at 1.68 g/t Au and 3.95 m at 19.5 g/t Au).  Further exploration including drilling is warranted on other prospects within the Ngayu belt including Yambenda, Mokepa and Mongaliema.

In terms of producing gold mines, the Kibali Gold Mine, approximately 220 km northeast by air from the Imbo Project, is located within the Archean-aged Moto greenstone belt and commenced gold production in September 2013.  The mine is owned by Kibali Goldmines SA (Kibali), which is a joint venture company with 45% owned by Barrick Gold, 45% by AngloGold Ashanti, and 10% by Société Minière de Kilo-Moto (SOKIMO). Barrick Gold is the operator and in 2020, Kibali produced 808,134 oz of gold at an AISC of US$778/oz of gold. Kibali had Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources of 15.5 Moz of gold, Inferred Mineral Resources of 1.5 Moz and Proven and Probable ore reserves at the end of 2020 of 9.33 Moz (from Barrick Gold 2020 Annual Report). Kibali is Africa's largest producing gold mine.

Interpretation and Conclusions

Introduction

The Qualified Persons (QPs) noted in the Technical Report the following interpretations and conclusions based on the review of the information available for the Technical Report.

37


Geology and Mineralisation

The Imbo Project sit is found within the Ngayu Archean greenstone belt, one of a number of Archean-aged, granite-greenstone belts that extend from northern Tanzania, into northeastern DRC and then into the Central African Republic.  These gold belts contain a number of major gold mines including Kibali (DRC) and Geita, North Mara and Bulyanhulu (Tanzania).  Gold deposits within these belts are associated with the globally important Neo-Archean orogenic gold deposits, examples of which are found in most Neo-Archean cratons around the world.

At the Adumbi deposit, the gold mineralisation is generally associated with quartz and quartz-carbonate-pyrite ± pyrrhotite ± arsenopyrite veins in a BIF unit. Examples of similar type BIF hosted gold deposits to Adumbi include the major Geita mine in Tanzania and Kibali mine in northeastern DRC.

Exploration, Drilling and Analytical Data Collection in Support of Mineral Resource Estimation

Systematic exploration has been conducted on the Adumbi deposit and Imbo Project area, including airborne LiDAR (light detection and ranging) and geophysical surveys, gridding, geological mapping, soil, trench, adit and auger sampling together with a number of core drilling programmes.  Sampling, sample storage, security, sample preparation and geochemical analyses and verification are considered appropriate for the resource estimate at Adumbi.

Mineral Resource Methodology and Estimation

The Mineral Inventory Statement is reported in accordance with the SEC's S-K 1300 requirements as well as NI 43-101 requirements.  The Adumbi Mineral Inventory for the various material types (oxide, transition and fresh) contained within the Adumbi practical pit designs consists of 1.883 Moz (28.185 Mt grading 2.08 g/t Au) of Indicated mineral resources and 1.777 Moz (20.828 Mt grading 2.65 g/t Au) of Inferred mineral resources.  The data used for the resource estimate and methods employed are considered reasonable for the level of study by the QP.

Open-Pit Optimisation and Mineral Inventory

Pit optimisation assumptions and parameters used to constrain the depth extent of the geological model to generate the mineral inventory of the open pit for the Adumbi deposit are considered appropriate for its location and infrastructural setting with appropriate metallurgical recoveries used from the test work and a gold price of US$1,600/oz, which is below current levels.

In the QP's opinion, the parameters used in the Mineral Resource to Mineral Inventory conversion process are reasonable.

Recommendations

Further work is warranted at Adumbi to advance the project up the value curve. A number of opportunities have been identified to increase the mineral resources at Adumbi.  It is recommended that Loncor follow up on these opportunities, which include the following:

  • Increasing and Upgrading Mineral Resources at Adumbi and within the Imbo Project

There is excellent exploration potential to further increase the mineral resources at Adumbi and within the Imbo Project.  At Adumbi, the mineralised BIF host sequence increases in thickness below the open-pit shell, and wide-spaced drilling has already intersected grades and thicknesses amenable to underground mining.  Further drilling is required to initially outline a significant underground Inferred Mineral Resource which can then be combined with the open-pit mineral resource so that studies can be undertaken for a combined open-pit and underground mining scenario at Adumbi.  It is also recommended that infill drilling be undertaken in the deeper part of the open-pit shell to upgrade the current Inferred resources into the Indicated category. Besides increasing the resource base, a combined open-pit/underground project could increase grade throughput and reduce strip ratios with the higher grade, deeper mineral resources being mined more economically by underground mining methods, which could increase annual gold production and drive down operating costs. Minecon also recommends that further studies should be undertaken to assist in estimating historical depletions and depletions by recent artisanal mining.

38


Additional deposits and prospects occur close to Adumbi and have the potential to add mineral resources and feed to the Adumbi operation.  Along trend from Adumbi, the Manzako and Kitenge deposits have Inferred Mineral Resources of 313,000 oz of gold (1.68 Mt grading 5.80 g/t Au) and remain open along strike and at depth. Further drilling is warranted on these two deposits

  • Along the structural trend, 8 km to 13 km to the southeast across the Imbo River and within the Imbo Project, four prospects (Esio Wapi, Paradis, Museveni and Mungo Iko) with similar host lithologies to Adumbi have been outlined with soil, rock and trench geochemical sampling.  An initial shallow, scout drilling programme should be undertaken on these four prospects to determine their mineral resource potential.
  • Additional Mineral Resources within the Ngayu Greenstone Belt

Additional feed for the Adumbi processing plant could also come from Loncor's 100% owned high-grade Makapela deposit, where Indicated Mineral Resources of 2.20 Mt grading 8.66 g/t Au (614,200 oz of gold) and Inferred Mineral Resources of 3.22 Mt grading 5.30 g/t Au (549,600 oz of gold) have been outlined to date with the high-grade material being able to be transported economically to Adumbi.

  • Additional geotechnical investigations

Additional geotechnical investigations including drilling are recommended to optimise and potentially steepen pit slopes especially for the competent fresh BIF host rock which could reduce the strip ratio and thereby lower mining costs at Adumbi.

  • Further metallurgical test work

Additional metallurgical test work, including additional flotation and petrographic studies, is recommended to confirm recoveries and reagent consumptions, and to optimise the flowsheet design.

Preliminary Economic Assessment of the Adumbi Deposit

In a press release issued December 15, 2021 (and filed on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and EDGAR (www.sec.gov)), the Company announced the results of a preliminary economic assessment ("PEA") for its Adumbi gold deposit.  The Adumbi PEA study was prepared for Loncor by a number of independent mining and engineering consultants led by New SENET (Pty) Ltd ("SENET"), Johannesburg (Processing and Infrastructure) and Minecon Resources and Services Limited ("Minecon"), Accra (Mineral Resources, Mining and Environmental and Social) and Maelgwyn South Africa (MMSA), Johannesburg (Metallurgical test work), Knight Piésold and Senergy, Johannesburg (Power) and Epoch, Johannesburg (Tailings and Water Storage).  SENET undertook the financial and economic evaluation.  The Adumbi PEA was prepared in accordance with the requirements of National Instrument 43-101 of the Canadian Securities Administrators.  A National Instrument 43-101 technical report in respect of the Adumbi PEA dated December 15, 2021 was prepared by SENET and Minecon and filed by the Company on SEDAR (www.sedar.com). 

39


Under new mining disclosure rules of the SEC, which became applicable to the Company for the first time for the purposes of filing this Form 20-F, an economic analysis (such as the Adumbi PEA) which includes inferred resources may only be included in this Form 20-F if the Form 20-F also includes the results of the economic analysis excluding inferred mineral resources.  As the Adumbi PEA is based on both indicated and inferred mineral resources and does not also provide a separate analysis which excludes inferred mineral resources, the results of the Adumbi PEA are not included in this Form 20-F. 

Makapela Project and Other Ngayu Properties of Loncor (2010 to 2016)

Loncor commenced its exploration activities in the Ngayu belt in early 2010 and a base camp was established at Yindi.  Due to its large landholdings for gold in the Ngayu belt of 4,500 square kilometres at that time, it was decided to divide the exploration into two concurrent programs:

  • Assessment of areas of known gold mineralization (Yindi and Makapela) with the potential to rapidly reach the drilling stage and provide a mineral resource.  Soil sampling, augering, rock chip and channel sampling were carried out prior to diamond drilling.
  • Regional programs aimed at assessing the remainder of the large land package as quickly and cost effectively as possible, in order to identify and prioritise mineralized target areas for follow-up, and enable less-prospective ground to be relinquished with confidence.  This program mainly entailed a regional BLEG (Bulk Leach Extractable Gold) survey and detailed interpretation of regional aeromagnetic data.  Both these programs were carried out under a technology consultation services agreement between Loncor and Newmont (a shareholder in Loncor), which was entered into in February 2011 (but is no longer in place).

During 2012, Loncor undertook more detailed aeromagnetic and radiometric surveys over priority target areas (i.e. Imva Fold area). Grids were established at the Yindi, Makapela, Itali, Matete, Nagasa, Mondarabe, Anguluku and Adumbi West prospects with airborne magnetic and radiometric surveys, geological mapping, stream sediment sampling, soil and rock sampling, trenching, augering, ground geophysical surveys (Induced Polarisation) and core drilling being undertaken.  During the period 2010-2013, Loncor undertook drilling programs on a number of prospects in the Ngayu belt and outlined mineral resources at Makapela (see below) in the west of the belt.

Loncor holds 100% of the Makapela project, which is a 5 kilometre radius, circular parcel of land within the western part of the Archean Ngayu greenstone belt surrounding and including the Makapela deposit.  The Company has applied for an exploitation permit in respect of its ownership of Makapela as per the requirements of applicable DRC law.  The application of the Company, which held an exploration permit for Makapela prior to making this application, is currently pending.  See the discussion in Item 4B of this Form 20-F under "Exploration Permits and Exploitation Permits under DRC Mining Law" for a summary of exploration permits and exploitation permits under DRC law. 

After undertaking soil and channel sampling, a core drilling program at Makapela commenced in November 2010 with the objective of testing along strike and at depth the sub-vertical, vein mineralized system being exploited by the artisanal miners at the Main, North and Sele Sele pits which returned significant results from soil and channel sampling.  Drill results at Makapela were announced by Loncor via a number of press releases in 2011 and 2012.  Significant drill intersections included 7.19 metres grading 64 g/t Au, 4.28 metres @ 32.6 g/t Au, 3.47 metres grading 24.9 g/t Au, 4.09 metres @ 21.7 g/t Au and 4.35 metres grading 17.5 g/t Au.

40


After conducting preliminary metallurgical test work, in May 2012, the Company announced a maiden mineral resource estimate for Makapela of 4.10 million tonnes grading 7.59 g/t Au (using a 2.75 g/t Au cut-off) for an inferred mineral resource of 1.0 million ounces of gold to a maximum vertical depth 500 metres below surface with gold mineralization open at depth.  The mineral resource was updated in April 2013 when the Company announced updated mineral resource estimates for Makapela of an indicated mineral resource of 0.61 million ounces of gold (2.20 million tonnes grading at 8.66 g/t Au) and an inferred mineral resource of 0.55 million ounces of gold (3.22 million tonnes grading at 5.30 g/t Au).

A total of 56 core holes (18,091 metres) were completed in the vicinity of the Main and North pits and 15 holes (3,594 metres) were drilled at Sele Sele.  In addition to the above resource drilling program, a total of 12 holes (1,560 metres) were drilled to locate potential extensions to the known reefs and new mineralized structures indicated by soil, rock chip and auger sampling.  Several units of Banded Ironstone Formation (BIF) are interlayered within basalts, and range up to 13 metres in thickness, although the width is generally less than 6 meters.  Quartz porphyry and quartz-feldspar porphyry dykes and sills are also present.  In the vicinity of the mineralized zones, the intrusive units are generally no more than a few metres in width.

Three styles of gold mineralization are present at Makapela:

  • Quartz veins emplaced into shear zones within the basalt sequence.  The best developed and economically significant vein (Reef 1) is exploited in the Main pit and consists of white quartz with irregularly distributed pyrite.  Visible gold is quite common, occurring in 28% of the intersections as isolated specks and small aggregates up to 2 mm across.  Reef 1 has been intersected over a strike length of 480 metres and to a vertical depth of 480 metres, and dips to the WNW at 80 - 90°.  It has an average true width and grade of 2.15 metres @ 11.15 g/t Au.  A characteristic of Reef 1 is the good geological continuity between drill sections; although the width and grade is variable, the vein was present in almost all holes, in approximately the expected position.  The basalt hosting Reef 1 shows intense hydrothermal alteration for several metres into the hanging wall and footwall.
  • A second style containing strike-parallel mineralization up to 6 metres in width is closely associated with shearing within and on the margins of narrow BIF units.  The most important zone (Reef 2) is exploited in the North pit.  Visible gold is much less common than in Reef 1 occurring in 5% of intersections.  Mineralization in the Sele Sele pit, 2 kilometres NNE of the North pit, has similar characteristics to Reef 2, and is interpreted to be on the same BIF unit.  However, the Sele Sele zone is generally wider and lower grade than in the North pit area, the best intersection drilled being 15.68 metres @ 5.35 g/t Au.  The mineralization plunges to the SSE at about 40°.
  • A third area of Reef 2 style mineralization occurs in the Bamako area where channel sampling returned an intersection of 4.60 metres @ 11.42 g/t Au.  The mineralization is associated with a 2-kilometre long soil anomaly, and although the best intersection from preliminary drilling was of relatively low grade (3.60 metres @ 4.43 g/t Au), further work is warranted.

The deposit at Makapela is open down plunge creating the prospect of drilling to below the current 500-metre depth to extend the resources as well as potentially exploring for additional resources between the main target areas delineated and further along the regional structure.  It is also considered unlikely by Loncor that all the mineralized bodies are outcropping and good potential exists for locating blind mineralized shoots along well-defined structures with an aggregate strike of over 5 kilometres.

41


Besides Makapela, Loncor drilled other prospects during this period and significant intersections were obtained at Yindi (21.3 metres grading 3.3 g/t Au, 24.0 metres grading 1.5 g/t Au and 10.3 metres grading 4.1 g/t Au) and at Itali (38.82 metres at 2.66 g/t Au, 14.70 metres @ 1.68 g/t Au and 3.95 metres @ 19.5 g/t Au).

At the end of 2013, due to a significant drop in the gold price, exploration was reduced and no further drilling was undertaken by Loncor.

Additional information with respect to the Company's Makapela project, and certain other properties of the Company in the Ngayu gold belt, is contained in the technical report dated May 29, 2012 and entitled "Updated National Instrument 43-101 Independent Technical Report on the Ngayu Gold Project, Orientale Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo".  A copy of the said report can be obtained from SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov

Joint Ventures between Loncor and Barrick in the Ngayu Belt (January 2016 to May 2021)

Loncor had several joint ventures with Barrick (TSX: "ABX"; NYSE: "GOLD") covering properties held by Loncor in the Ngayu belt.  The joint venture areas were located approximately 220 kilometres southwest of the large Kibali gold mine, which is operated by Barrick.  As per the joint venture agreements entered between Loncor and Barrick (the first of which was signed in January 2016), Barrick managed and funded all exploration on approximately 2,000 km2 of Loncor ground in the Ngayu belt until the completion of a pre-feasibility study on any gold discovery meeting the investment criteria of Barrick.  Subject to the DRC's free carried interest requirements, Barrick would earn 65% of any discovery with Loncor holding the balance of 35%.  Loncor would be required, from that point forward, to fund its pro-rata share in respect of the discovery in order to maintain its 35% interest or be diluted.  Loncor's Imbo and Makapela Projects, as well as the Yindi prospect, did not form part of the joint ventures with Barrick. 

The Kibali Gold Mine, approximately 220 kilometres northeast by air from the Imbo Project, is owned 45% by each of Barrick and AngloGold Ashanti with Societe Miniere de Kilo-Moto (SOKIMO) owning the remaining 10%.  Barrick is the operator of this mine.  In 2020, Kibali produced 808,134 ounces of gold. 

In January 2017, Loncor announced preliminary results of the geophysical airborne survey undertaken by Randgold as part of its joint venture with Loncor (it is noted that Randgold and Barrick merged under Barrick's name in early 2019).  A 10,013 line-kilometre helicopter borne electromagnetic 'VTEM' survey was completed over the Ngayu belt.  This survey provided a valuable additional layer of geological information through mapping the conductivity nature of the belt.  The new data assisted with resolving the lithological nature of the belt as well as assisting in identifying major structures and areas of structural complexity.

The belt scale exploration strategy of Barrick was to focus on the discovery of large high-quality gold deposits by rapidly identifying and progressing targets that show the potential to meet these filters.  Gold mineral resources had already been identified within the Ngayu greenstone belt in the Makapela and Adumbi deposits, and the objective was to further unlock the potential of the Ngayu greenstone belt for a world class discovery using cutting edge geophysics, geochemistry, structural interpretation and driven by an experienced and proven exploration team on the ground.

42


By the end of 2019, Barrick had identified a number of priority drill targets which were to be drilled during 2020.  Barrick commenced its drilling program in June 2020.  Initial results under the Barrick drilling program were announced by Loncor in November 2020.

In May 2021, Barrick informed Loncor that it would not be continuing exploration on the Loncor/Barrick joint venture ground.  Loncor is assessing the results of the joint venture programme.  In particular, the Mongaliema and Mokepa prospects, which are close to Makapela, are planned to be further investigated by Loncor.  At Mongaliema, the target area is a west-northwest trending shear zone hosted within altered metasediments with cherty units near the contact of a dolerite intrusive.  Pitting has demonstrated that much of the area is covered by thick transported cover which hinders near-surface exploration.  Pitting was undertaken to the southwest of the trench, which graded 32 metres at 1.37 g/t Au. Results from pits in excess of 5 metres deep confirmed the southwestern extension beneath thick transported alluvial material, with an average high grade of 18.13 g/t Au from 11 samples.  Further work is warranted from the results received to date at Mongaliema.  Mongaliema will be evaluated to determine whether it has the resource potential to be combined with the nearby Makapela deposit. 

North Kivu Project

Loncor owns or controls a contiguous block of 46 exploration permits (or "PRs") covering an area of approximately 13,000 square kilometers to the northwest of Lake Edward in the North Kivu province in the DRC.  The areas covered by these PRs are located between the two major gold belt terrains of the DRC: the Twangiza-Namoya gold belt, owned by Banro Corporation Ltd., and the Kilo-Moto gold belt, previously controlled by Moto Gold and now owned by Barrick and Anglogold Ashanti.  In addition to gold, there are a number of alluvial platinum occurrences in the project area, including the type locality for the platinum selenide mineral luberoite near Lubero.  To date, no primary source has been found for the alluvial platinum occurrences.  Due to to the poor security situation in much of the North Kivu province, all of the North Kivu PRs are currently under force majeure. 

Historical data was compiled from the colonial period of alluvial gold mining and exploration which outlined ten gold prospects for follow-up, the most prospective being the Manguredjipa prospect where 300,000 ounces of alluvial gold was reportedly mined during the colonial period up to 1960.  Other gold prospects warranting follow up included Lutunguru, Lubero, Makwasu, Lutela, Bilolo, Manzia, Mohanga and Ludjulu.

The Company's most explored gold prospect area within the North Kivu project area has been Manguredjipa.  Information relating to the Manguredjipa prospect is included in the independent technical report dated February 29, 2012 and entitled "National Instrument 43-101 Independent Technical Report on the Manguredjipa Gold Project, North Kivu Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo".  A copy of this technical report can be obtained from SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov

No exploration has been undertaken at the North Kivu project by the Company since 2012 due to the force majeure situation in respect of the PRs and in order to focus exploration and funds on the priority Ngayu properties.

Qualified Person

Peter N. Cowley, President of the Company and a "qualified person" as such term is defined in subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K and in National Instrument 43-101, has reviewed and approved the technical information in this Form 20-F relating to the Company's mineral projects. 

43


Locality Map of the Imbo Project in Africa

44


Location of Imbo Project within the DRC

45


Locality Map of Imbo Project 

46


Item 4A.  Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable. 

Item 5.  Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

See the management's discussion and analysis of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2021 incorporated by reference into this Form 20-F as Exhibit 15.1. 

A.  Operating Results

See the management's discussion and analysis of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2021 incorporated by reference into this Form 20-F as Exhibit 15.1.

B.  Liquidity and Capital Resources.

See the management's discussion and analysis of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2021 incorporated by reference into this Form 20-F as Exhibit 15.1. 

C.  Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.

The Company is a mineral exploration company and does not carry on any research and development activities.

D.  Trend Information

None of the Company's assets are currently in production or generate revenue.  However, the cyclical nature of the prices of metals, particularly the price of gold, is reasonably likely to have an effect on the Company's liquidity and capital resources.  If the price of gold or the worldwide demand for gold decreases, there would likely be an adverse effect on the Company's ability to raise additional funding and attract exploration partners for its projects.  For a number of years, junior mineral exploration companies have experienced difficulties raising new money, and capital raising activities completed by such companies have often resulted in substantial dilution to existing shareholders. 

Additionally, any outbreaks of contagious diseases and other adverse public health developments in countries where the Company operates could have a material and adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.  For example, the outbreak of COVID-19 has resulted in significant restrictive measures being implemented by governments of various countries to control the spread of COVID-19.  Such COVID-19 related restrictions and disruptions, including for employees, industry experts, personnel and suppliers across different industries, may negatively impact the Company's business operations and therefore the Company's operational results and financial condition.  In addition, COVID-19 has resulted in a widespread health crisis that has adversely affected the economies and financial markets of many countries, resulting in an economic downturn that could affect the Company's ability to access or raise capital through issuances of the Company's securities as and when needed for the Company's business operations. 

47


Item 6.  Directors, Senior Management and Employees

A.  Directors and Senior Management

The directors and officers of the Company and term of continuous service are as follows:

Name Position(s) with the Company Served as a
Director Since
Arnold T. Kondrat Executive Chairman of the Board and director August 24, 1993
John Barker Chief Executive Officer Not applicable
Peter N. Cowley President and a director June 26, 2020
Donat K. Madilo Chief Financial Officer Not applicable
Fabrice Matheys General Manager, DRC Not applicable
Geoffrey G. Farr Corporate Secretary Not applicable
Zhengquan (Philip) Chen (1) (2) Director June 28, 2019
Richard J. Lachcik (1) (2) Director June 29, 1998
William R. Wilson (1) (2) Director July 15, 1997

____________________

(1) Member of the audit committee of the board of directors of the Company. 

(2) Member of the compensation committee of the board of directors of the Company. 

Arnold T. Kondrat - Mr. Kondrat is the Company's principal founder and has over 30 years of management experience in the resource exploration industry.  During this time he has been a senior officer and director of a number of publicly-traded resource exploration companies, in both Canada and the United States, including principal founder of several of these companies.  In addition to his positions with Loncor, Mr. Kondrat is also presently Chief Executive Officer, President and a director of Gentor Resources Inc. (a mineral exploration company listed on the TSX Venture Exchange), and President of Sterling Portfolio Securities Inc. (a private venture capital firm based in Toronto).  He was a senior officer of Banro Corporation (a gold mining company in the DRC) from 1994 to 2017. 

John Barker - Mr. Barker has over 30 years of global mining experience encompassing many key elements of the mining world.  His experience includes 15 years as a leading mining analyst, including with RBC DS heading up their Global Gold Mining initiative and focusing on African mining equities.  Subsequently, he was Vice President Corporate Development for TSX-listed SouthernEra Resources, which was taken over by Lonmin, and was instrumental in the Guinor Gold sale to Crew Gold.  More recently he has been involved in various copper, diamond and platinum initiatives in Southern Africa.  During his career he has been involved in numerous asset sales and equity issues raising over US$600m in Canada, Australia, Europe and RSA.

Peter N. Cowley - Mr. Cowley is a geologist with over 40 years' experience in the minerals industry and a history of major exploration successes in Africa, including the DRC. Among his major accomplishments, Mr. Cowley was Chief Executive Officer and President of Banro Corporation from 2004 to 2008 where he led the exploration that delineated major gold resources at Twangiza and Namoya in the DRC.  Prior to joining Banro, Mr. Cowley was Managing Director of Ashanti Exploration, where he led the exploration team in the discovery and development of the Geita mine in Tanzania.  Prior to Ashanti, he was Technical Director of Cluff Resources which discovered and developed mines in Zimbabwe, Ghana and Tanzania.  He holds an M.Sc from the Royal School of Mines, an MBA from the Strathclyde Business School and is a Fellow of the Institute of Materials, Minerals and Mining.  He previously served as Chief Executive Officer and President of Loncor from 2009 to 2015 (he re-joined Loncor as President in October 2019). 

48


Donat K. Madilo - Mr. Madilo has over 30 years of experience in accounting, administration and finance in the DRC and North America.  He held senior officer positions with Banro Corporation (a gold mining company in the DRC) from 1996 to 2018 (including Senior Vice President, Commercial & DRC Affairs and Chief Financial Officer).  In addition to being Chief Financial Officer of Loncor, he is also presently Chief Financial Officer of Gentor Resources Inc.  Mr. Madilo's previous experience includes director of finance of Coocec-ceaz (a credit union chain in the DRC) and senior advisor at Conseil Permanent de la Comptabilité au Congo, the accounting regulation board in the DRC.  He holds a Bachelor of Commerce (Honours) degree from Institut Supérieur de Commerce de Kinshasa, a B.Sc. (Licence) in Applied Economics from University of Kinshasa and a Masters of Science in Accounting (Honours) from Roosevelt University in Chicago.

Fabrice Matheys - Mr. Matheys is a professional geologist with more than 29 years of experience in Africa.  Prior to his role with Loncor, Mr. Matheys served as Exploration Geologist for De Beers in Botswana, West Africa and South Africa and spent eight years as Exploration Manager in the DRC with exploration programs focused on gold, diamonds, niobium and tungsten.

Geoffrey G. Farr - Mr. Farr has been a partner of the law firm Dickinson Wright LLP (which acts as legal counsel to Loncor) from July 2019 to present.  He practices corporate and securities law.  From February 2011 to June 2019, Mr. Farr was General Counsel to and Corporate Secretary of each of Loncor and Gentor Resources Inc. (he remains Corporate Secretary of each).  From February 2011 to October 2018, Mr. Farr was Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Banro Corporation, and from June 2017 to January 2019, he was General Counsel to and Corporate Secretary of Kuuhubb Inc. (a company listed on the TSX Venture Exchange focused on lifestyle and mobile video game applications).  Prior to February 2011, Mr. Farr practised corporate and securities law in Toronto for 17 years, which included extensive experience in representing public companies.  He holds a LL.B. from the University of Ottawa and a B.Comm. from Queen's University. 

Zhengquan (Philip) Chen - Mr. Chen is Managing Partner and Co-Founder of Dynaco Capital Inc., a financial advisory firm based in Toronto and associated with numerous North American and Asian venture capital and private equity funds and multi-billion dollar Chinese conglomerates.  He works on transactions between Chinese firms and North American companies.  Prior to founding Dynaco Capital Inc. in September 2007, Mr. Chen was a senior associate of an international private investment bank, from February 1998 to June 2006, where he was directly involved in dozens of listings of Chinese companies on the TSX Venture Exchange and Frankfurt Stock Exchange and numerous financial advisory assignments in a variety of sectors.  Prior to that he served as Executive Vice President of a subsidiary of a Chinese conglomerate in New York from March 1996 to July 1997.  Mr. Chen gained his BSc and LLM degrees in China and an EMBA degree from the University of Hawaii.

Richard J. Lachcik - Prior to his retirement in 2017, Mr. Lachcik practiced corporate and securities law in Toronto, Canada for over 30 years.  His practice included extensive experience in representing public companies, as well as acting for a number of investment dealers.  He has been an officer and director of a number of Canadian public resource companies. 

49


William R. Wilson - Mr. Wilson is Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of TUVERA Exploration Inc.  TUVERA is a private holding company for the ARVENUT exploration properties in Nevada, Utah and New Mexico.  He has created and managed 11 mining companies over 25 years with properties in the U.S., Canada, Russia, the DRC and Ukraine.  Mr. Wilson is a Qualified Professional in Mining, Metallurgy/Processing and Environmental Compliance (Member no. 01063QP) of the Mining and Metallurgical Society of America.  He has a degree in Metallurgical Engineering from the Colorado School of Mines and a Masters of Business Administration degree from the University of Southern California.  Mr. Wilson has been involved in the mining industry for more than 40 years.  He has been a director and senior officer of a number of public companies in both Canada and the United States, and has been a member of the audit committee of several of these companies.

There are no family relationships among any of the Company's directors or senior management.

There is no arrangement or understanding with major shareholders, customers, suppliers or others, pursuant to which any person referred to above was selected as a director or officer of the Company.

The following directors of the Company are presently directors of other issuers that are public companies:

Name of Director Names of Other Issuers
   
Arnold T. Kondrat Gentor Resources Inc.
   
Zhengquan (Philip) Chen
 
Fandom Sports Media Corp.
Kontrol Technologies Corp.
   
Peter N. Cowley Deltic Energy plc
   
Richard J. Lachcik Gentor Resources Inc.
   
William R. Wilson Gentor Resources Inc.

Other than the board of directors, the Company does not have an administrative, supervisory or management body.

B.  Compensation

Named Officers

Summary Compensation Table   

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to compensation paid to the officers of the Company set out in the following table (the "NEOs") for the financial year ended December 31, 2021.   

50


Name and
Principal Position
Year Salary
(US$)
Share-based
awards

(US$)
Option-based
awards
(2)
(US$)
Non-equity
incentive plan
compensation -

Annual Incentive
Plan

(US$)
All other
Compensation

(US$)
Total
Compensation

(US$)
Arnold T. Kondrat
Executive Chairman of the Board (1)
2021 $250,000 N/A $198,450 $250,000 $8,476 (3) $706,926
John Barker
Chief Executive Officer (4)
2021 $157,605 (5) N/A $326,389 N/A Nil $483,994
Donat K. Madilo
Chief Financial Officer
2021 $166,667 N/A $119,070 N/A $11,071 (3) $296,808
Peter N. Cowley
President
2021 $150,000 N/A $198,450 N/A Nil $348,450
Fabrice Matheys
General Manager, DRC
2021 $135,000 N/A $122,206 N/A $43,504 (6) $300,710

______________________________________

(1) Mr. Kondrat was appointed Executive Chairman of the Board of the Company in September 2021.  Prior to this appointment, he served as Chief Executive Officer of the Company. 

(2) These amounts represent the grant date fair value of the stock options awarded in 2021 to the NEOs, calculated in Canadian dollars and then converted to U.S. dollars using an average exchange rate for 2021 of Cdn$1.00 = US$0.7980.  There were two stock option grants in 2021 to the NEOs - on March 15 and September 29.  Grant date fair value of the stock options granted on March 15, 2021 to the NEOs was calculated in accordance with the Black-Scholes model using the price of the Company's common shares on the date of grant of Cdn$0.65 per share, with the key valuation assumptions being stock price volatility of 82.68%, risk free interest rate of 0.49%, no dividend yield and expected life of 3 years.  Grant date fair value of the stock options granted on September 29, 2021 to the NEOs was calculated in accordance with the Black-Scholes model using the price of the Company's common shares on the date of grant of Cdn$0.70 per share, with the key valuation assumptions being stock price volatility of 82.38%, risk free interest rate of 0.67%, no dividend yield and expected life of 3 years. 

(3) This amount represents medical and life insurance premiums paid by the Company.

(4) Mr. Barker was appointed Chief Executive Officer of the Company in September 2021.  Prior to this appointment, he served as Vice President of Business Development of the Company. 

(5) The salary for Mr. Barker was paid in Canadian dollars.  The U.S. dollar amount set out in the above table for such salary was calculated using an average exchange rate for 2021 of Cdn$1.00 = US$0.7980. 

(6) This amount represents medical and life insurance premiums paid by the Company totaling US$3,504 and a US$40,000 bonus paid by the Company to Mr. Matheys.

Incentive Plan Awards

The following table provides details regarding outstanding option and share-based awards held by the NEOs as at December 31, 2021: 

51


Outstanding share-based awards and option-based awards
  Option-based Awards Share-based Awards
Name Option grant
date
Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options
(1)
(#)
Option exercise
price
(2)
($)
Option
expiration
date
Aggregate
value of
unexercised
in-the-money
options
(3)
(US$)
Number of
shares or
units that
have not
vested

(#)
Market or
payout value
of share-
based awards
that have not
vested

(US$)
Arnold T. Kondrat Sept. 29, 2021 250,000 Cdn$0.70 (US$0.55) Sept. 29, 2026 Nil N/A N/A
Mar. 15, 2021 250,000 Cdn$0.65 (US$0.51) Mar. 15, 2026 $2,500    
Dec. 6, 2019 500,000 Cdn$0.40 (US$0.32) Dec. 6, 2024 $100,000    
June 24, 2019 250,000 Cdn$0.18 (US$0.14) June 24, 2024 $95,000    
Mar. 14, 2019 125,000 Cdn$0.14 (US$0.11) Mar. 14, 2024 $51,250    
John Barker Sept. 29, 2021 600,000 Cdn$0.70 (US$0.55) Sept. 29, 2026 Nil N/A N/A
Mar. 15, 2021 250,000 Cdn$0.65 (US$0.51) Mar. 15, 2026 $2,500    
Sept. 15, 2020 100,000 Cdn$0.60 (US$0.47) Sept. 15, 2025 $5,000    
April 19, 2020 250,000 Cdn$0.45 (US$0.36) April 19, 2025 $40,000    
Donat K. Madilo Sept. 29, 2021 150,000 Cdn$0.70 (US$0.55) Sept. 29, 2026 Nil N/A N/A
Mar. 15, 2021 150,000 Cdn$0.65 (US$0.51) Mar. 15, 2026 $1,500    
Dec. 6, 2019 150,000 Cdn$0.40 (US$0.32) Dec. 6, 2024 $30,000    
June 24, 2019 125,000 Cdn$0.18 (US$0.14) June 24, 2024 $47,500    
Mar. 14, 2019 125,000 Cdn$0.14 (US$0.11) Mar. 14, 2024 $51,250    
Peter N. Cowley Sept. 29, 2021 250,000 Cdn$0.70 (US$0.55) Sept. 29, 2026 Nil N/A N/A
Mar. 15, 2021 250,000 Cdn$0.65 (US$0.51) Mar. 15, 2026 $2,500    
Dec. 6, 2019 500,000 Cdn$0.40 (US$0.32) Dec. 6, 2024 $100,000    
Fabrice Matheys Sept. 29, 2021 100,000 Cdn$0.70 (US$0.55) Sept. 29, 2026 Nil N/A N/A
Mar. 15, 2021 200,000 Cdn$0.65 (US$0.51) Mar. 15, 2026 $2,000    
Dec. 6, 2019 200,000 Cdn$0.40 (US$0.32) Dec. 6, 2024 $40,000    

______________________________

(1) The stock options granted on March 14, 2019, April 19, 2020 and September 15, 2020 vest (or vested as applicable) as follows: 1/4 of the stock options granted to each optionee vest (or vested as applicable) on each of the 6 month, 12 month, 18 month and 24 month anniversaries of the grant date.  The stock options granted on June 24, 2019, December 6, 2019, March 15, 2021 and September 29, 2021 vested as follows: 100% of the stock options granted to each optionee vested on the 4 month anniversary of the grant date. 

(2) The exercise price of each of the stock options held by the NEOs is in Canadian dollars.  The U.S. dollar figures set out in this column of the table were calculated using the exchange rate on December 31, 2021 as reported by the Bank of Canada for the conversion of Canadian dollars into U.S. dollars of Cdn$1.00 = US$0.7888

(3) This is based on (a) the closing sale price per share of the Company's common shares on December 31, 2021 of Cdn$0.66 as reported by the Toronto Stock Exchange, and (b) converting that price into a price of US$0.52 using the exchange rate on December 31, 2021 as reported by the Bank of Canada for the conversion of Canadian dollars into U.S. dollars of Cdn$1.00 = US$0.7888

52


Non-Executive Directors

Director compensation is designed to achieve the following goals: (a) compensation should attract and retain the most qualified people to serve on the board of directors of the Company (the "Board"); (b) compensation should align directors' interests with the long-term interests of shareholders; (c) compensation should fairly pay directors for risks and responsibilities related to being a director of an entity of the Company's size and scope: and (d) the structure of the compensation should be simple, transparent and easy for shareholders to understand. 

The amounts earned by the non-executive directors of the Company during the financial year ended December 31, 2021 are set out in the table below under "Director Summary Compensation Table". 

Non-executive directors are entitled to receive stock option grants under the Company's Stock Option Plan, as recommended by the Board's compensation committee and determined by the Board.  The exercise price of such stock options is determined by the Board, but shall in no event be less than the last closing price of the Company's common shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange prior to the date the stock options are granted.  See the disclosure below under "Incentive Stock Option Plan" for a summary of the terms of the Company's Stock Option Plan.

Non-executive directors of the Company are also reimbursed for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending Board or committee meetings and otherwise incurred in carrying out their duties as directors of the Company.   

Executive directors of the Company are compensated as employees of the Company and are not entitled to additional compensation for performance of director duties.  Mr. Kondrat and Mr. Cowley are executive directors of the Company. 

53


Director Summary Compensation Table

The following compensation table sets out the compensation paid to each of the Company's directors in the year ended December 31, 2021, other than Mr. Kondrat and Mr. Cowley.  See "Summary Compensation Table" above for details regarding the compensation paid to each of Mr. Kondrat and Mr. Cowley as an executive of the Company in respect of services rendered during 2021. 

Name Fees earned
(US$)
Share-based
awards

(US$)
Option-based
awards
(1)
(US$)
Non-equity
incentive plan
compensation

(US$)
All other
Compensation

(US$)
Total
(US$)
 
Zhengquan (Philip) Chen $24,000 N/A $59,535 N/A N/A $83,535
Richard J. Lachcik $24,000 N/A $59,535 N/A N/A $83,535
William R. Wilson $24,000 N/A $59,535 N/A N/A $83,535

________________________________

(1) These amounts represent the grant date fair value of the stock options awarded in 2021 to the directors set out in the above table, calculated in Canadian dollars and then converted to U.S. dollars using an average exchange rate for 2021 of Cdn$1.00 = US$0.7980.  There were two stock option grants in 2021 to the said directors - on March 15 and September 29.  Grant date fair value of the stock options granted on March 15, 2021 was calculated in accordance with the Black-Scholes model using the price of the Company's common shares on the date of grant of Cdn$0.65 per share, with the key valuation assumptions being stock price volatility of 82.68%, risk free interest rate of 0.49%, no dividend yield and expected life of 3 years.  Grant date fair value of the stock options granted on September 29, 2021 was calculated in accordance with the Black-Scholes model using the price of the Company's common shares on the date of grant of Cdn$0.70 per share, with the key valuation assumptions being stock price volatility of 82.38%, risk free interest rate of 0.67%, no dividend yield and expected life of 3 years. 

Incentive Plan Awards

The following table provides details regarding the outstanding option and share based awards held as at December 31, 2021 by the directors of the Company other than Mr. Kondrat and Mr. Cowley.  See "Named Officers - Incentive Plan Awards" above for details regarding the outstanding stock options held by Mr. Kondrat and Mr. Cowley as at December 31, 2021.

Outstanding share-based awards and option-based awards
  Option-based Awards Share-based Awards
Name Option grant
date
Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options
(1)
(#)
Option exercise
price
(2)
($)
Option
expiration
date
Aggregate
value of
unexercised
in-the-money
options
(3)
(US$)
Number of
shares or
units of
shares that
have not
vested

(#)
Market or
payout value
of share-
based awards
that have not
vested

(US$)
Zhengquan (Philip) Chen Sept. 29, 2021 75,000 Cdn$0.70 (US$0.55) Sept. 29, 2026 Nil N/A N/A
Mar. 15, 2021 75,000 Cdn$0.65 (US$0.51) Mar. 15, 2026 $750    
Dec. 6, 2019 100,000 Cdn$0.40 (US$0.32) Dec. 6, 2024 $21,000    
July 2, 2019 75,000 Cdn$0.18 (US0.14) July 2, 2024 $28,500    
Richard J. Lachcik Sept. 29, 2021 75,000 Cdn$0.70 (US$0.55) Sept. 29, 2026 Nil N/A N/A

 

54


Outstanding share-based awards and option-based awards
  Option-based Awards Share-based Awards
Name Option grant
date
Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options
(1)
(#)
Option exercise
price
(2)
($)
Option
expiration
date
Aggregate
value of
unexercised
in-the-money
options
(3)
(US$)
Number of
shares or
units of
shares that
have not
vested

(#)
Market or
payout value
of share-
based awards
that have not
vested

(US$)
  Mar. 15, 2021 75,000 Cdn$0.65 (US$0.51) Mar. 15, 2026 $750    
  Dec. 6, 2019 100,000 Cdn$0.40 (US$0.32)) Dec. 6, 2024 $21,000    
  June 24, 2019 75,000 Cdn$0.18 (US$0.14) June 24, 2024 $28,500    
  Mar. 14, 2019 75,000 Cdn$0.14 (US$0.11) Mar. 14, 2024 $30,750    
William R. Wilson Sept. 29, 2021 75,000 Cdn$0.70 (US$0.55) Sept. 29, 2026 Nil N/A N/A
  Mar. 15, 2021 75,000 Cdn$0.65 (US$0.51) Mar. 15, 2026 $750    
  Dec. 6, 2019 100,000 Cdn$0.40 (US$0.32) Dec. 6, 2024 $21,000    
  June 24, 2019 75,000 Cdn$0.18 (US$0.14) June 24, 2024 $28,500    
  Mar. 14, 2019 75,000 Cdn$0.14 (US$0.11) Mar. 14, 2024 $30,750    

________________________________

(1) The stock options granted on March 14, 2019 and July 2, 2019 vest (or vested as applicable) as follows: 1/4 of the stock options granted to each optionee vest (or vested as applicable) on each of the 6 month, 12 month, 18 month and 24 month anniversaries of the grant date.  The stock options granted on June 24, 2019, December 6, 2019, March 15, 2021 and September 29, 2021 vested as follows: 100% of the stock options granted to each optionee vested on the 4 month anniversary of the grant date.   

(2) The exercise price of each of the stock options held by the NEOs is in Canadian dollars.  The U.S. dollar figures set out in this column of the table were calculated using the exchange rate on December 31, 2021 as reported by the Bank of Canada for the conversion of Canadian dollars into U.S. dollars of Cdn$1.00 = US$0.7888

(3) This is based on (a) the closing sale price per share of the Company's common shares on December 31, 2021 of Cdn$0.66 as reported by the Toronto Stock Exchange, and (b) converting that price into a price of US$0.52 using the exchange rate on December 31, 2021 as reported by the Bank of Canada for the conversion of Canadian dollars into U.S. dollars of Cdn$1.00 = US$0.7888

55


Other Information

Neither the Company nor its subsidiaries provides pension, retirement or similar benefits.

C.  Board Practices

Each director of the Company holds office until the close of the next annual meeting of shareholders of the Company following his election or appointment, unless his office is earlier vacated in accordance with the by-laws of the Company.  See Item 6.A. of this Form 20-F for the dates the directors of the Company were first elected or appointed to the Board.

Executives' Employment Contracts

The Company and Arnold T. Kondrat have entered into an employment contract (the "Executive Chairman Agreement") which sets out the terms upon which Mr. Kondrat performs the services of Executive Chairman of the Board of the Company.  Mr. Kondrat's annual salary under the Executive Chairman Agreement is US$250,000.  The term of the Executive Chairman Agreement continues until December 31, 2024, provided that the Company may terminate the Executive Chairman Agreement at any time for just cause upon written notice to Mr. Kondrat.  The Executive Chairman Agreement includes a "change of control bonus", pursuant to which, upon the occurrence of a "change of control" (as defined in the Executive Chairman Agreement) of the Company where the Company's "market capitalization" (as defined in the Executive Chairman Agreement) exceeds Cdn$75,000,000, the Company shall pay to Mr. Kondrat a Cdn$5,000,000 cash bonus.

The Company and John Barker have entered into an employment contract (the "CEO Agreement") which sets out the terms upon which Mr. Barker performs the services of Chief Executive Officer of the Company.  Mr. Barker's annual salary under the CEO Agreement is Cdn$250,000.  The term of the CEO Agreement continues until September 21, 2023, provided that the Company may terminate the CEO Agreement at any time for just cause upon written notice to Mr. Barker. 

The Company and Donat K. Madilo have entered into an employment contract (the "CFO Agreement") which sets out the terms upon which Mr. Madilo performs the services of Chief Financial Officer of the Company.  Mr. Madilo's annual salary under the Madilo Agreement is US$175,000.  The Company may terminate the CFO Agreement at any time for just cause upon written notice to Mr. Madilo. 

The Company and Peter N. Cowley have entered into an employment contract (the "President Agreement") which sets out the terms upon which Mr. Cowley performs the services of President of the Company.  Mr. Cowley's annual salary under the President Agreement is US$175,000.  The term of the President Agreement continues until May 1, 2025, provided that the Company may terminate the President Agreement at any time for just cause upon written notice to Mr. Cowley. 

56


Each of the CEO Agreement, CFO Agreement and President Agreement also provides as follows: (a) in the event of a "change of control" (as such term is defined in each employment agreement) of the Company or the "constructive dismissal" of the employee (as such term is defined in each employment agreement) of the employee, the employee has the right to terminate his employment agreement and is entitled to be paid by the Company an amount (the "Retiring Allowance") equal to the sum of (i) three times his annual salary and (ii) three times the "Bonus Amount" (see below for definition of "Bonus Amount"); (b) if immediately prior to such termination the employee holds stock options of the Company, he shall be entitled to exercise all such stock options (vested and unvested) at any time during the period of time commencing upon such termination and ending on the natural expiry date of such stock options; and (c) in the event the Company terminates the employment agreement without cause, the employee is entitled to the stock option exercise rights described above in item (b) and to be paid by the Company the Retiring Allowance.   

"Bonus Amount" is defined to mean an amount equal to one-half of the aggregate amount of all bonuses paid or payable to the employee by the Company and its subsidiaries in respect of the two most recent fiscal years of the Company.

Audit Committee

The Board has an audit committee (the "Audit Committee"), the members of which are Zhengquan (Philip) Chen, Richard J. Lachcik and William R. Wilson.  Each member of the Audit Committee is independent within the meaning of Canadian National Instrument 52-110 - Audit Committees ("NI 52-110") and Section 803A of the NYSE American Company Guide.  Each member of the Audit Committee is also "financially literate" within the meaning of NI 52-110.  At no time since the commencement of the Company's financial year ended December 31, 2021 was a recommendation of the Audit Committee to nominate or compensate an external auditor not adopted by the Board.  The Audit Committee's charter is incorporated by reference into this Form 20-F as Exhibit 1.3. 

Compensation Committee

The Board has a compensation committee, the members of which are Zhengquan (Philip) Chen, Richard J. Lachcik and William R. Wilson.  See the discussion above under "Audit Committee" with respect to the independence of the members of the compensation committee.  The primary function of the compensation committee is to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to: (a) human resources policies; and (b) executive compensation.  To carry out its oversight responsibilities, the compensation committee's duties include the following: 

1. review and recommend for approval to the Board, the Company's key human resources policies;

2. review and recommend for approval to the Board the compensation and benefits policy and plans (including incentive compensation plans) for the Company;

3. review and recommend to the Board the employment agreements of the Company's executive officers;

4. evaluate annually the performance of the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and recommend to the Board his annual compensation package and performance objectives;

57


5. review annually and recommend to the Board the annual compensation package and performance objectives of the other executive officers of the Company;

6. review annually and recommend to the Board the annual salaries (or percentage change in salaries) for the Company's non-executive staff;

7. review annually and recommend to the Board the adequacy and form of the compensation of the Company's directors and be satisfied the compensation realistically reflects the responsibilities and risk involved in being such a director;

8. review annually and recommend for approval to the Board the executive compensation disclosure of the Company in its information circular, and be satisfied that the overall compensation philosophy and policy for senior officers is adequately disclosed and describes in sufficient detail the rationale for salary levels, incentive payments, share options and all other components of executive compensation as prescribed by applicable securities laws;

9. determine grants of options to purchase shares of the Company under the Company's Stock Option Plan and recommend same to the Board for approval;

10. engage, at the Company's expense, any external professional or other advisors which it determines necessary in order to carry out its duties hereunder; and

11. perform any other activities consistent with this mandate as the compensation committee or the Board deems necessary or appropriate.

Retention Allowance

Loncor previously had a policy which provided that employees were entitled to receive a retention allowance (the "Retention Allowance") on termination of their employment with the Company, provided the employee had been with the Company for a minimum of two years and provided that termination was not due to misconduct (in the case of misconduct, the Retention Allowance was forfeited).  The amount of the Retention Allowance was equal to the employee's monthly base salary multiplied by the number of years the employee was with the Company (up to a maximum of 10 years), with any partial year being recognized on a pro rata basis.  While the Retention Allowance policy was discontinued by Loncor effective December 31, 2017, the Retention Allowance amounts accrued for the NEOs up to December 31, 2017 remain recorded as a liability in Loncor's financial statements. 

D.  Employees

The following sets out the number of employees which the Company and its subsidiaries had as at December 31, 2021, December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, providing a breakdown of these employees by location/project:

58


 
Location/Project
Dec. 31,
2021
Dec. 31,
2020
Dec. 31,
2019
       
Loncor office, Toronto, Canada  5  4  3
       
Loncor office in Beni, DRC 3 3 -
       
Ngayu projects - - 1
       
Imbo Project camp 21 38 4
       
Totals: 29 45 8

________________________________

(1) The Imbo Project was acquired by the Company in September 2019 (see "Information on the Company - History and Development of the Company" in Item 4A of this Form 20-F).  The significant increase in employees at the Imbo Project camp during 2020 was a result of the commencement by the Company of an exploration program at the Imbo Project following its acquisition. 

Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries has any unionized employees.

Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries employ a significant number of temporary employees.

E.  Share Ownership

The following table sets out the number of common shares of the Company held by the Company's directors and officers as of April 20, 2022 (including the percentage of the Company's outstanding common shares represented by such shares).  See Item 6.B. of this Form 20-F for information regarding the stock options of the Company held by the Company's directors and officers as of December 31, 2021. 

 
 
Name
 
Number of Common
Shares Owned
Percentage of
Outstanding

Common Shares
John Barker 325,500 0.23%
Zhengquan (Philip) Chen 29,800 0.02%
Peter N. Cowley 110,000 0.08%
Geoffrey G. Farr 302,500 0.22%
Arnold T. Kondrat 29,683,909 (1) 21.08%
Richard J. Lachcik 155,833 0.11%
Donat K. Madilo 420,000 0.30%
Fabrice Matheys nil -
William R. Wilson 151,667 0.11%

59


Incentive Stock Option Plan

The Company has a Stock Option Plan (the "Plan"), the principal purposes of which are: (A) to retain and attract qualified directors, officers, employees and consultants which the Company and its subsidiaries require; (B) to promote a proprietary interest in the Company and its subsidiaries; (C) to provide an incentive element in compensation; and (D) to promote the development of the Company and its subsidiaries.  The following summarizes the terms of the Plan: 

(a) Stock options may be granted from time to time by the Board to such directors, officers, employees and consultants of the Company or a subsidiary of the Company, and in such numbers, as are determined by the Board at the time of the granting of the stock options.

(b) The total number of common shares of the Company issuable upon the exercise of all outstanding stock options granted under the Plan shall not at any time exceed 10% of the total number of outstanding common shares of the Company, from time to time (as at the date of this Form 20-F, there are outstanding under the Plan 10,646,000 stock options entitling the holders to purchase an aggregate of 10,646,000 common shares of the Company (which is equal to 7.56% of the number of common shares of the Company which are outstanding as at the date of this Form 20-F), such that the number of new stock options currently available for future grants under the Plan is stock options to purchase an aggregate of 3,436,417 common shares of the Company (which is equal to 2.44% of the number of common shares of the Company which are outstanding as at the date of this Form 20-F). 

(c) The exercise price of each stock option shall be determined in the discretion of the Board at the time of the granting of the stock option, provided that the exercise price shall not be lower than the "Market Price".  "Market Price" means the last closing price of the common shares of the Company on the Toronto Stock Exchange prior to the date the stock option is granted. 

(d) The total number of common shares of the Company issued to "insiders" (as such term is defined in Part 1 of the TSX Company Manual) of the Company, within any one year period, under all "security based compensation arrangements" (within the meaning of the rules of the Toronto Stock Exchange) of the Company shall not exceed 10% of the total number of outstanding common shares of the Company. 

(e) The total number of common shares of the Company issuable to "insiders" (as such term is defined in Part 1 of the TSX Company Manual) of the Company, at any time, under all "security based compensation arrangements" (within the meaning of the rules of the Toronto Stock Exchange) of the Company shall not exceed 10% of the total number of outstanding common shares of the Company. 

(f) All stock options shall be for a term determined in the discretion of the Board at the time of the granting of the stock options, provided that no stock option shall have a term exceeding five years and, unless the Board at any time makes a specific determination otherwise (but subject to the terms of the Plan), a stock option and all rights to purchase common shares of the Company pursuant thereto shall expire and terminate immediately upon the optionee who holds such stock option ceasing to be at least one of a director, officer or employee of or consultant to the Company or a subsidiary of the Company, as the case may be. 

(g) Unless otherwise determined by the Board at the time of the granting of the stock options, one-quarter of the stock options granted to an optionee vest on each of the 6 month, 12 month, 18 month and 24 month anniversaries of the grant date. 

60


(h) Except in limited circumstances in the case of the death of an optionee, stock options shall not be assignable or transferable.

(i) Disinterested shareholder approval is required prior to any reduction in the exercise price of a stock option if the optionee holding such stock option is an insider of the Company.

(j) The Company may amend from time to time the terms and conditions of the Plan by resolution of the Board.  Any amendments shall be subject to the prior consent of any applicable regulatory bodies, including the Toronto Stock Exchange (to the extent such consent is required).

(k) The Board has full and final discretion to interpret the provisions of the Plan, and all decisions and interpretations made by the Board shall be binding and conclusive upon the Company and all optionees, subject to shareholder approval if required by the Toronto Stock Exchange. 

(l) The Plan does not provide for financial assistance by the Company to an optionee in connection with an option exercise. 

The Board may, in its sole discretion, accelerate the vesting of currently outstanding stock options granted under the Plan in the event a take-over bid is made for the common shares of the Company, any change of control of the Company occurs or any other transaction involving the Company occurs. 

A copy of the Plan is incorporated by reference into this Form 20-F as Exhibit 4.1. 

Item 7.  Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions

A.  Major Shareholders

To the knowledge of management of the Company, based on a review of publicly available filings as at April 20, 2022, the following are the only persons or companies who beneficially own 5% or more of the outstanding common shares of the Company: 

Name of Shareholder Number of Common
Shares Owned
Percentage of Outstanding
Common Shares (1)
Arnold T. Kondrat (2) 29,683,909 21.08%
Resolute Canada 2 Pty Ltd (3) 31,450,000 22.33%
Newmont Canada FN Holdings ULC (4)   7,275,000   5.17%

_________________________________

(1) The information in this column of the table is based on the number of common shares of the Company outstanding as at April 20, 2022. 

(2) Mr. Kondrat is Executive Chairman of the Board and a director of the Company.  As at March 21, 2018, Mr. Kondrat held 37,150,409 (or 46.82%) of the outstanding common shares of the Company.  See Item 4A. of this Form 20-F ("History and Development of the Company") with respect to (a) the share sale transaction with Resolute pursuant to which Mr. Kondrat sold 12,500,000 common shares of the Company in June 2018, and (b) the private placement transaction pursuant to which Mr. Kondrat acquired 350,000 common shares of the Company in June 2018.  Immediately following these transactions, Mr. Kondrat held 25,000,409 (or 26.68%) of the outstanding common shares of the Company.  During 2019, 2020 and 2021, Mr. Kondrat acquired, in total, an additional 4,683,500 common shares, such that he currently holds (as at April 20 2022) 29,683,909 (or 21.08%) of the outstanding common shares of the Company. 

61


(3) See Item 4A of this Form 20-F ("History and Development of the Company") which sets out the transactions pursuant to which Resolute Canada 2 Pty Ltd ("Resolute") acquired in 2018 25,500,000 common shares of the Company.  Immediately following these transactions, these 25,500,000 common shares represented 27.22% of the outstanding common shares of the Company.  In 2020 and 2021, Resolute acquired, in total, an additional 5,950,000 common shares of the Company, such that Resolute currently holds (as at April 20 2022) 31,450,000 (or 22.33%) of the outstanding common shares of the Company. 

(4) See Item 4A of this Form 20-F ("History and Development of the Company") which sets out the transactions pursuant to which Newmont Canada FN Holdings ULC acquired the common shares of the Company currently held by it as reflected in the above table.

None of the shareholders disclosed above have any voting rights with respect to their respective common shares of the Company that are different from any other holder of common shares of the Company.

As of April 20, 2022, based on the Company's shareholders' register, there were 91 shareholders of record of the Company's common shares in the United States, holding 5.98% of the outstanding common shares of the Company. 

Control by Foreign Government or Other Persons

To the best of the knowledge of management of the Company, the Company is not directly or indirectly owned or controlled by another corporation, any foreign government, or any other natural or legal person, severally or jointly.

Change of Control

As of the date of this Form 20-F, there are no arrangements known to the Company which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of the Company.

B. Related Party Transactions

On February 25, 2020, the Company closed a private placement 6,000,000 common shares of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.40 per share for gross proceeds of Cdn$2,400,000.  Arnold T. Kondrat ("Kondrat"), who is Executive Chairman (but was Chief Executive Officer at the time of the transaction) and a director of the Company, purchased 1,440,000 of such shares, Resolute Canada 2 Pty Ltd ("Resolute"), which holds more than 10% of the outstanding common shares of the Company, purchased 300,000 of such shares, and Donat K. Madilo ("Madilo"), who is Chief Financial Officer of the Company, purchased 50,000 of such shares. 

On July 31, 2020, the Company closed a first tranche of a private placement financing for 8,000,000 common shares of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.50 per share for gross proceeds of Cdn$4,000,000.  Kondrat purchased 270,000 of such shares, Resolute purchased 3,000,000 of such shares, Madilo purchased 70,000 of such shares, and Peter N. Cowley, who is President and a director of the Company, purchased 50,000 of such shares. 

On February 3, 2021, the Company closed a first tranche of a private placement financing for 8,000,000 units of the Company (the "Units") at a price of Cdn$0.50 per Unit for gross proceeds of Cdn$4,000,000.  Each Unit consisted of one common share of the Company and one-half of one common share purchase warrant (each whole common share purchase warrant, a "Warrant") of the Company, with each Warrant entitling the holder thereof to acquire one common share of the Company at an exercise price of Cdn$0.75 for a period of 12 months following the closing date of the issuance of the Units.  Kondrat purchased 200,000 of the Units and Resolute purchased 1,200,000 of the Units. 

62


Reference is also made to Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements of the Company filed as part of this annual report under Item 18, for additional information regarding related party transactions. 

C.  Interests of Experts and Counsel

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the U.S. Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.

Item 8.  Financial Information

A.  Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information

Consolidated Financial Statements

The consolidated financial statements of the Company are filed as part of this annual report under Item 18.

Legal or Arbitration Proceedings

The Company is not aware of any current or pending material legal or arbitration proceeding to which it is or is likely to be a party or of which any of its properties are or are likely to be the subject.

The Company is not aware of any material proceeding in which any director, member of senior management or affiliate of the Company is either a party adverse to the Company or any of its subsidiaries or has a material interest adverse to the Company or any of its subsidiaries. 

Dividend Policy

The Company has not paid any dividend or made any other distribution in respect of its outstanding shares and management does not anticipate that the Company will pay dividends or make any other distribution in respect on its shares in the foreseeable future.  The Company's Board, from time to time, and on the basis of any earnings and the Company's financial requirements or any other relevant factor, will determine the future dividend or distribution policy of the Company with respect to its shares.

B.  Significant Changes

There have been no significant changes in the affairs of the Company since the date of the audited annual consolidated financial statements of the Company as at and for the year ended December 31, 2021, other than as discussed in this Form 20-F.

Item 9.  The Offer and Listing

A.  Offer and Listing Details

The Company's common shares (a) are listed for trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the "TSX") under the symbol "LN", and (b) are quoted on the OTCQX tier of the OTC Markets (the "OTC") under the symbol "LONCF".  The prices in the following tables have been adjusted as applicable to reflect the two to one Share Consolidation implemented by the Company in September 2019. 

63


Toronto Stock Exchange

The Company's common shares commenced trading on the TSX on April 26, 2013.  Prior to April 26, 2013, such shares traded on the TSX Venture Exchange.  The following table discloses the annual high and low sales prices in Canadian dollars for the common shares of the Company for the five most recent financial years of the Company as traded on the TSX:

Year High (Cdn$) Low (Cdn$)
2021 $0.86 $0.53
2020 $0.89   $0.315
2019 $0.49 $0.13
2018 $0.26 $0.12
2017 $0.40 $0.15

The following table discloses the high and low sales prices in Canadian dollars for the common shares of the Company for each quarterly period within the two most recent financial years of the Company as traded on the TSX:

Quarter Ended High (Cdn$) Low (Cdn$)
December 31, 2021 $0.80 $0.60
September 30, 2021 $0.74 $0.54
June 30, 2021 $1.16 $0.78
March 31, 2021 $0.81 $0.50
December 31, 2020 $0.87 $0.51
September 30, 2020 $0.89 $0.47
June 30, 2020 $0.70 $0.36
March 31, 2020 $0.88 $0.315

The following table discloses the monthly high and low sales prices in Canadian dollars for the common shares of the Company for the most recent six months as traded on the TSX:

Month High (Cdn$) Low (Cdn$)
April 2022 (1) $0.60 $0.45
March 2022 $0.66 $0.56
February 2022 $0.62 $0.49
January 2022 $0.65 $0.55
December 2021 $0.80 $0.63
November 2021 $0.86 $0.67
October 2021 $0.81 $0.60

 

64


 

_________________________________

(1) From April 1, 2022 to April 25, 2022.

US Trading

From April 27, 2011 to April 24, 2014, the Company's common shares were traded in the United States on the NYSE American, from April 25, 2014 to April 30, 2015, the Company's common shares traded in the United States on the OTCQB tier of the OTC, from May 1, 2015 to June 20, 2019, the Company's common shares traded in the United States on the OTC Pink tier of the OTC, and from June 21, 2019 to July 31, 2020, the Company's common shares traded in the United States on the OTCQB tier of the OTC.  Since August 3, 2020, the Company's common shares have traded in the United States on the OTCQX tier of the OTC. 

The following table discloses the annual high and low sales prices in United States dollars for the common shares of the Company for the five most recent financial years of the Company as traded on the OTC Pink, OTCQB and OTCQX tiers of the OTC, as applicable. 

Year High (US$) Low (US$)
2021 $0.969 $0.394
2020 $0.66 $0.22
2019 $0.40 $0.19
2018 $0.18 $0.08
2017 $0.28 $0.10

The following table discloses the high and low sales prices in United States dollars for the common shares of the Company for each quarterly period within the two most recent financial years as traded on the OTCQB and OTCQX tiers of the OTC, as applicable: 

Quarter Ended High (US$) Low (US$)
December 31, 2021 $0.672 $0.478
September 30, 2021 $0.596 $0.467
June 30, 2021 $0.969 $0.551
March 31, 2021 $0.662 $0.394
December 31, 2020 $0.66 $0.38
September 30, 2020 $0.63 $0.35
June 30, 2020 $0.50 $0.26
March 31, 2020 $0.64 $0.22

 

65


The following table discloses the monthly high and low sales prices in United States dollars for the common shares of the Company for the most recent six months as traded on the OTCQX tier of the OTC:

Month High (US$) Low (US$)
April 2022 (1) $0.462 $0.359
March 2022 $0.504 $0.451
February 2022 $0.472 $0.394
January 2022 $0.522 $0.478
December 2021 $0.625 $0.482
November 2021 $0.672 $0.553
October 2021 $0.631 $0.478

_________________________________

(1) From April 1, 2022 to April 25, 2022.

B.  Plan of Distribution

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the U.S. Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.

C.  Markets

The Company's outstanding common shares are listed on the TSX and are quoted on the OTCQX tier of the OTC.

D.  Selling Shareholder

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the U.S. Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.

E.  Dilution

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the U.S. Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.

F.  Expenses of the Issue

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the U.S. Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.

Item 10.  Additional Information

A.  Share Capital

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the U.S. Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item. 

66


B.  Memorandum and Articles of Association

A copy of the Company's articles of amalgamation and articles of amendment are incorporated by reference into this Form 20-F as Exhibits 1.1, 1.5 and 1.6.  The Company's general by-law is incorporated by reference into this Form 20-F as Exhibit 1.2. 

The Company is a corporation governed by the Ontario Business Corporations Act (the "OBCA").  Under the OBCA, the articles of the Company may, by "special resolution" (see below for definition), be amended to add, change or remove any rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions, including rights to accrued dividends, in respect of all or any of its shares, whether issued or unissued.  Under the OBCA, "special resolution" means a resolution passed by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the votes cast by the shareholders who voted in respect of that resolution or signed by all the shareholders entitled to vote on that resolution.

The Company's articles provide that there are no restrictions on the business the Company may carry on and there are no restrictions on the powers the Company may exercise.

The Company's authorized share capital consists of an unlimited number of common shares and an unlimited number of preference shares, issuable in series, of which 140,824,174 common shares and no preference shares were issued and outstanding as of April 25, 2022.  The following is a summary of the material provisions attaching to the common shares and preference shares.

Common Shares - The holders of the common shares are entitled to receive notice of and to attend all meetings of the shareholders of the Company and shall have one vote for each common share held at all meetings of the shareholders of the Company, except for meetings at which only holders of another specified class or series of shares are entitled to vote separately as a class or series.  Subject to the prior rights of the holders of the preference shares or any other shares ranking senior to the common shares, the holders of the common shares are entitled to (a) receive any dividends as and when declared by the Board, out of the assets of the Company properly applicable to the payment of dividends, in such amount and in such form as the board of directors may from time to time determine, and (b) receive the remaining property of the Company in the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company.

Preference Shares - The Board may issue the preferences shares at any time and from time to time in one or more series, each series of which shall have the designations, rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions fixed by the directors.  The preference shares of each series shall rank on a parity with the preference shares of every other series, and shall be entitled to priority over the common shares and any other shares of the Company ranking junior to the preference shares, with respect to priority in the payment of dividends and the return of capital and the distribution of assets of the Company in the event of the liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company. 

Under the Company's general by-law, a director of the Company who is a party to, or who is a director or officer of a party to, or has a material interest in any person who is a party to, a material contract or material transaction or proposed material contract or proposed material transaction with the Company, must disclose the nature and extent of their interest at the time and in the manner provided by the OBCA and such material interest must be entered in the minutes of the meetings of directors or otherwise noted in the records of the Company.  Any such material contract or material transaction or proposed material contract or proposed material transaction must be referred to the Board or shareholders for approval even if such contract is one that in the ordinary course of the Company's business would not require approval by the Board or shareholders.  Such a director must not attend any part of a meeting of directors during which the contract or transaction is discussed and must not vote on any resolution to approve the same except as provided by the OBCA.

67


Also under the Company's general by-law, the Company's directors may be paid such remuneration for their services as the Board may from time to time determine.  The directors are also entitled to be reimbursed for travelling and other expenses properly incurred by them in attending meetings of the Board or any committee thereof. 

With respect to borrowing powers, the Company's general by-law provides that, without limiting the borrowing powers of the Company as set forth in the OBCA, the Board may from time to time on behalf of the Company, without authorization of the shareholders:

(a) borrow money upon the credit of the Company;

(b) issue, reissue, sell or pledge debt obligations of the Company;

(c) subject to the OBCA, give a guarantee on behalf of the Company to secure performance of an obligation to any person; and

(d) mortgage, hypothecate, pledge, or otherwise create a security interest in all or any property of the Company, owned or subsequently owned, to secure any obligation of the Company.

A director of the Company need not be a shareholder of the Company.  There is no age limit requirement for a director of the Company. 

The annual meeting of shareholders of the Company is held at such time in each year (but not later than 15 months after holding the last preceding annual meeting of shareholders) and at such place as the Board may from time to time determine.  The Board has the power to call a special meeting of shareholders of the Company at any time.

The only persons entitled to be present at a meeting of shareholders are those entitled to vote thereat, the directors and auditor of the Company and others who, although not entitled to vote, are entitled or required under any provision of the OBCA or the articles or by-laws to be present at the meeting.  Any other person may be admitted only on the invitation of the chairperson of the meeting or with the consent of the meeting.

A quorum for the transaction of business at any meeting of shareholders is two persons present in person, each being a shareholder entitled to vote thereat or a duly appointed proxyholder or representative for a shareholder so entitled. 

Disclosure of Share Ownership

In general, under applicable securities regulation in Canada, a person or company who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, voting securities of an issuer or who exercises control or direction over voting securities of an issuer or a combination of both, carrying more than 10% of the voting rights attached to all the issuer's outstanding voting securities is an insider and must, within 10 days of becoming an insider, file a report in the required form effective the date on which the person became an insider.  The report must disclose any direct or indirect beneficial ownership of, or control or direction over, securities of the reporting issuer.  Additionally, securities regulation in Canada provides for the filing of a report by an insider of a reporting issuer whose holdings change, which report must be filed within five days from the day on which the change takes place.

68


The rules in the U.S. governing the ownership threshold above which shareholder ownership must be disclosed are more stringent than those discussed above.  Section 13 of the U.S. Exchange Act imposes reporting requirements on persons who acquire beneficial ownership (as such term is defined in Rule 13d-3 under the U.S. Exchange Act) of more than 5% of a class of an equity security registered under Section 12 of the U.S. Exchange Act.  In general, such persons must file, within 10 days after such acquisition, a report of beneficial ownership with the SEC containing the information prescribed by the regulations under Section 13 of the U.S. Exchange Act.  This information is also required to be sent to the issuer of the securities and to each exchange where the securities are traded.

C. Material Contracts

Except for contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business and other than as disclosed elsewhere in this Form 20-F, there are no material contracts to which the Company is currently a party that were entered into by the Company or any of its subsidiaries during the two years immediately preceding the date of this Form 20-F. 

D.  Exchange Controls

There are no governmental laws, decrees, regulations or other legislation, including foreign exchange controls, in Canada which may affect the export or import of capital or that may affect the remittance of dividends, interest or other payments to non-resident holders of the Company's securities.  Any remittances of dividends to United States residents, however, are subject to a withholding tax pursuant to the Income Tax Act (Canada) and the Canada-U.S. Income Tax Convention (1980), each as amended.  Remittances of interest to U.S. residents entitled to the benefits of such Convention are generally not subject to withholding taxes except in limited circumstances involving participating interest payments.  Certain other types of remittances, such as royalties paid to U.S. residents, may be subject to a withholding tax depending on all of the circumstances.

Restrictions on Share Ownership by Non-Canadians

There are no limitations under the laws of Canada or in the organizational documents of the Company on the right of foreigners to hold or vote securities of the Company, except that the Investment Canada Act (the "ICA") may require review and approval by the Minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development ("ISED") of certain acquisitions of "control" of the Company by a "non-Canadian".  The threshold for acquisitions is generally defined as being one-third or more of the voting shares of the Company.  "Non-Canadian" generally means an individual who is not a Canadian citizen, or a corporation, partnership, trust or joint venture that is ultimately controlled by non-Canadians.

Under the ICA, transactions exceeding certain financial thresholds, and which involve the acquisition of control of a Canadian business by a non-Canadian, are subject to review and cannot be implemented unless the ISED Minister and/or, in the case of a Canadian business engaged in cultural activities, the Minister of Canadian Heritage, are satisfied that the transaction is likely to be of "net benefit to Canada".  If a transaction is subject to review (a "Reviewable Transaction"), an application for review must be filed with the Investment Review Division of ISED Canada and/or the Department of Canadian Heritage prior to the implementation of the Reviewable Transaction.  The responsible Minister is then required to determine whether the Reviewable Transaction is likely to be of net benefit to Canada, taking into account, among other things, certain factors specified in the ICA and any written undertakings that may have been given by the applicant.  The ICA contemplates an initial review period of up to 45 days after filing; however, if the responsible Minister has not completed the review by that date, s/he may unilaterally extend the review period by up to 30 days (or such longer period as may be agreed to by the applicant and the Minister) to permit completion of the review.  If the responsible Minister is not satisfied that the investment is likely to be of net benefit to Canada, s/he may prohibit the investment or order a divestiture (if the investment has already been completed).

69


If the transaction is not reviewable because it does not meet or exceed the applicable financial threshold, the non-Canadian investor must still give notice to ISED Canada and, in the case of a Canadian business engaged in cultural activities, Canadian Heritage, of its acquisition of control of a Canadian business within 30 days of the implementation of the investment.

Furthermore, under the ICA, every investment in, or acquisition of control of, a Canadian business by a non-Canadian is subject to a "national security" review which examines whether the transaction could be injurious to Canada's national security.  There is no minimum threshold for the size of transaction potentially subject to such review.  If the ISED Minister, after consultation with the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness and the investor, considers that the investment could be injurious to national security, the Minister refers the matter to the Governor in Council. Following its review, if the Governor in Council may take any measures in respect of the investment that it considers advisable to protect national security, including denying the investment, asking for undertakings, imposing terms or conditions for the investment or ordering a divestiture (if the investment has already been completed).

E.  Certain United States Federal Income Tax Considerations

The following is a general summary of certain material U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to a U.S. Holder (as defined below) arising from and relating to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of common shares of the Company ("Common Shares").

This summary is for general information purposes only and does not purport to be a complete analysis or listing of all potential U.S. federal income tax considerations that may apply to a U.S. Holder arising from and relating to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Common Shares.  In addition, this summary does not take into account the individual facts and circumstances of any particular U.S. Holder that may affect the U.S. federal income tax consequences to such U.S. Holder, including specific tax consequences to a U.S. Holder under an applicable tax treaty.  Accordingly, this summary is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, legal or U.S. federal income tax advice with respect to any particular U.S. Holder. Except as specifically set forth below, this summary does not discuss applicable tax reporting requirements. This summary does not address the U.S. federal net investment income, U.S. federal alternative minimum, U.S. federal estate and gift, U.S. state and local, and non-U.S. tax consequences to U.S. Holders of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Common Shares.  Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal, U.S. federal net investment income, U.S. federal alternative minimum, U.S. federal estate and gift, U.S. state and local, and non-U.S. tax consequences relating to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Common Shares.

No legal opinion from U.S. legal counsel or ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") has been requested, or will be obtained, regarding the U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to U.S. Holders as discussed in this summary.  This summary is not binding on the IRS, and the IRS is not precluded from taking a position that is different from, and contrary to, the positions taken in this summary.  In addition, because the authorities on which this summary is based are subject to various interpretations, the IRS and the U.S. courts could disagree with one or more of the conclusions described in this summary.

70


Scope of this Summary

Authorities

This summary is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), Treasury Regulations (whether final, temporary, or proposed), published rulings of the IRS, published administrative positions of the IRS, the Convention Between Canada and the United States of America with Respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital, signed September 26, 1980, as amended (the "Canada-U.S. Tax Convention"), and U.S. court decisions that are applicable and, in each case, as in effect and available, as of the date of this document.  Any of the authorities on which this summary is based could be changed in a material and adverse manner at any time, and any such change could be applied on a retroactive or prospective basis which could affect the U.S. federal income tax considerations described in this summary.  This summary does not discuss the potential effects, whether adverse or beneficial, of any proposed legislation that, if enacted, could be applied on a retroactive or prospective basis. 

U.S. Holders

For purposes of this summary, the term "U.S. Holder" means a beneficial owner of Common Shares that is for U.S. federal income tax purposes:

  • an individual who is a citizen or resident of the U.S.;
  • a corporation (or other entity taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) organized under the laws of the U.S., any state thereof or the District of Columbia;
  • an estate whose income is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or
  • a trust that (1) is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the U.S. and the control of one or more U.S. persons for all substantial decisions or (2) has a valid election in effect under applicable Treasury Regulations to be treated as a U.S. person.

Non-U.S. Holders

For purposes of this summary, a "non-U.S. Holder" is a beneficial owner of Common Shares that is not a U.S. Holder.  This summary does not address the U.S. federal income tax consequences to non-U.S. Holders arising from and relating to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Common Shares.  Accordingly, a non-U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal, U.S. federal net investment income, U.S. federal alternative minimum, U.S. federal estate and gift, U.S. state and local, and foreign tax consequences (including the potential application of and operation of any income tax treaties) relating to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Common Shares.

U.S. Holders Subject to Special U.S. Federal Income Tax Rules Not Addressed

This summary does not address the U.S. federal income tax considerations applicable to U.S. Holders that are subject to special provisions under the Code, including, but not limited to, U.S. Holders that: (a) are tax-exempt organizations, qualified retirement plans, individual retirement accounts, or other tax-deferred accounts; (b) are financial institutions, underwriters, insurance companies, real estate investment trusts, or regulated investment companies; (c) are broker-dealers, dealers, or traders in securities or currencies that elect to apply a mark-to-market accounting method; (d) have a "functional currency" other than the U.S. dollar; (e) own Common Shares as part of a straddle, hedging transaction, conversion transaction, constructive sale, or other integrated transaction; (f) acquired Common Shares in connection with the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation for services; (g) hold Common Shares other than as a capital asset within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code (generally, property held for investment purposes); (h) are subject to the alternative minimum tax; (i) are partnerships and other pass-through entities (and investors in such partnerships and entities); (j) are S corporations (and shareholders thereof); (k) own, have owned or will own (directly, indirectly, or by attribution) 10% or more of the total combined voting power or value of the outstanding shares of the Company; (l) are U.S. expatriates or former long-term residents of the U.S.; (m) hold Common Shares in connection with a trade or business, permanent establishment, or fixed base outside the United States or are otherwise subject to taxing jurisdictions other than, or in addition to, the U.S.; or (n) are subject to special tax accounting rules with respect to the Common Shares.  U.S. Holders that are subject to special provisions under the Code, including, but not limited to, U.S. Holders described immediately above, should consult their own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal, U.S. federal net investment income, U.S. federal alternative minimum, U.S. federal estate and gift, U.S. state and local, and non-U.S. tax consequences relating to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Common Shares.

71


If an entity or arrangement that is classified as a partnership (or other "pass-through" entity) for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds Common Shares, the U.S. federal income tax consequences to such entity and the partners (or other owners) of such entity generally will depend on the activities of the entity and the status of such partners (or owners).  This summary does not address the tax consequences to any such owner.  Partners (or other owners) of entities or arrangements that are classified as partnerships or as "pass-through" entities for U.S. federal income tax purposes should consult their own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences arising from and relating to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Common Shares.

Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules

If the Company were to constitute a "passive foreign investment company" under the meaning of Section 1297 of the Code (a "PFIC", as defined below) for any year during a U.S. Holder's holding period, then certain potentially adverse rules will affect the U.S. federal income tax consequences to a U.S. Holder resulting from the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Common Shares.  The Company believes that it was classified as a PFIC during the tax year ended December 31, 2021, and due to the nature of the Company's assets and the income that the Company expects to generate, the Company expects to be a PFIC for its current tax year and may be a PFIC in subsequent tax years.  No opinion of legal counsel or ruling from the IRS concerning the status of the Company as a PFIC has been obtained or is currently planned to be requested.  The determination of whether any corporation was, or will be, a PFIC for a tax year depends, in part, on the application of complex U.S. federal income tax rules, which are subject to differing interpretations.  In addition, whether any corporation will be a PFIC for any tax year depends on the assets and income of such corporation over the course of each such tax year and, as a result, cannot be predicted with certainty as of the date of this document.  Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge any determination made by the Company (or any subsidiary of the Company) concerning its PFIC status.  Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the PFIC status of the Company and any subsidiary of the Company.

In addition, in any year in which the Company is classified as a PFIC, such holder will be required to file an annual report with the IRS containing such information as Treasury Regulations and/or other IRS guidance may require.  In addition to penalties, a failure to satisfy such reporting requirements may result in an extension of the time period during which the IRS can assess a tax. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the requirements of filing such information returns under these rules, including the requirement to file a IRS Form 8621 annually.

72


The Company generally will be a PFIC if, for a tax year, (a) 75% or more of the gross income of the Company is passive income (the "income test") or (b) 50% or more of the value of the Company's assets either produce passive income or are held for the production of passive income, based on the quarterly average of the fair market value of such assets (the "asset test").  "Gross income" generally includes all sales revenues less the cost of goods sold, plus income from investments and from incidental or outside operations or sources, and "passive income" generally includes, for example, dividends, interest, certain rents and royalties, certain gains from the sale of stock and securities, and certain gains from commodities transactions. 

Active business gains arising from the sale of commodities generally are excluded from passive income if substantially all of a foreign corporation's commodities are stock in trade or inventory, depreciable property used in a trade or business, or supplies regularly used or consumed in a trade or business and certain other requirements are satisfied.

For purposes of the PFIC income test and asset test described above, if the Company owns, directly or indirectly, 25% or more of the total value of the outstanding shares of another corporation, the Company will be treated as if it (a) held a proportionate share of the assets of such other corporation and (b) received directly a proportionate share of the income of such other corporation.  In addition, for purposes of the PFIC income test and asset test described above, and assuming certain other requirements are met, "passive income" does not include certain interest, dividends, rents, or royalties that are received or accrued by the Company from certain "related persons" (as defined in Section 954(d)(3) of the Code), to the extent such items are properly allocable to the income of such related person that is not passive income.

Under certain attribution rules, if the Company is a PFIC, U.S. Holders will generally be deemed to own their proportionate share of the Company's direct or indirect equity interest in any company that is also a PFIC (a "Subsidiary PFIC"), and will be subject to U.S. federal income tax under the "Default PFIC Rules under Section 1291 of the Code" discussed below on their proportionate share of (a) any "excess distributions," as described below, on the stock of a Subsidiary PFIC and (b) a disposition or deemed disposition of the stock of a Subsidiary PFIC by the Company or another Subsidiary PFIC, both as if such U.S. Holders directly held the shares of such Subsidiary PFIC.  In addition, U.S. Holders may be subject to U.S. federal income tax on any indirect gain realized on the stock of a Subsidiary PFIC on the sale or disposition of Common Shares.  Accordingly, U.S. Holders should be aware that they could be subject to tax under the PFIC rules even if no distributions are received and no redemptions or other dispositions of Common Shares are made.

Default PFIC Rules Under Section 1291 of the Code

If the Company is a PFIC for any tax year during which a U.S. Holder owns Common Shares, the U.S. federal income tax consequences to such U.S. Holder of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Common Shares will depend on whether and when such U.S. Holder makes an election to treat the Company and each Subsidiary PFIC, if any, as a "qualified electing fund" or "QEF" under Section 1295 of the Code (a "QEF Election") or makes a mark-to-market election under Section 1296 of the Code (a "Mark-to-Market Election").  A U.S. Holder that does not make either a QEF Election or a Mark-to-Market Election will be referred to in this summary as a "Non-Electing U.S. Holder".

A Non-Electing U.S. Holder will be subject to the rules of Section 1291 of the Code (described below) with respect to (a) any gain recognized on the sale or other taxable disposition of Common Shares and (b) any excess distribution received on the Common Shares.  A distribution generally will be an "excess distribution" to the extent that such distribution (together with all other distributions received in the current tax year) exceeds 125% of the average distributions received during the three preceding tax years (or during a U.S. Holder's holding period for the Common Shares, if shorter).

73


Under Section 1291 of the Code, any gain recognized on the sale or other taxable disposition of Common Shares (including an indirect disposition of the stock of any Subsidiary PFIC), and any "excess distribution" received on Common Shares or with respect to the stock of a Subsidiary PFIC, must be ratably allocated to each day in a Non-Electing U.S. Holder's holding period for the respective Common Shares.  The amount of any such gain or excess distribution allocated to the tax year of disposition or distribution of the excess distribution and to years before the entity became a PFIC, if any, would be taxed as ordinary income.  The amounts allocated to any other tax year would be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the highest tax rate applicable to ordinary income (and not eligible for certain preferential tax rates, as discussed below) in each such year, and an interest charge would be imposed on the tax liability for each such year, calculated as if such tax liability had been due in each such year.  A Non-Electing U.S. Holder that is not a corporation must treat any such interest paid as "personal interest," which is not deductible.

If the Company is a PFIC for any tax year during which a Non-Electing U.S. Holder holds Common Shares, the Company will continue to be treated as a PFIC with respect to such Non-Electing U.S. Holder, regardless of whether the Company ceases to be a PFIC in one or more subsequent tax years.  If the Company ceases to be a PFIC, a Non-Electing U.S. Holder may terminate this deemed PFIC status by electing to recognize gain (which will be taxed under the rules of Section 1291 of the Code discussed above), but not loss, as if such Common Shares were sold on the last day of the last tax year for which the Company was a PFIC.

QEF Election

A U.S. Holder that makes a timely and effective QEF Election for the first tax year in which its holding period of its Common Shares begins generally will not be subject to the rules of Section 1291 of the Code discussed above with respect to its Common Shares.  A U.S. Holder that makes a timely and effective QEF Election will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on such U.S. Holder's pro rata share of (a) the net capital gain of the Company, which will be taxed as long-term capital gain to such U.S. Holder, and (b) the ordinary earnings of the Company, which will be taxed as ordinary income to such U.S. Holder.  Generally, "net capital gain" is the excess of (a) net long-term capital gain over (b) net short-term capital loss, and "ordinary earnings" are the excess of (a) "earnings and profits" over (b) net capital gain.  A U.S. Holder that makes a QEF Election will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on such amounts for each tax year in which the Company is a PFIC, regardless of whether such amounts are actually distributed to such U.S. Holder by the Company.  However, for any tax year in which the Company is a PFIC and has no net income or gain, U.S. Holders that have made a QEF Election would not have any income inclusions as a result of the QEF Election.  If a U.S. Holder that made a QEF Election has an income inclusion, such a U.S. Holder may, subject to certain limitations, elect to defer payment of current U.S. federal income tax on such amounts, subject to an interest charge.  If such U.S. Holder is not a corporation, any such interest paid will be treated as "personal interest," which is not deductible.

A U.S. Holder that makes a timely and effective QEF Election with respect to the Company generally (a) may receive a tax-free distribution from the Company to the extent that such distribution represents "earnings and profits" of the Company that were previously included in income by the U.S. Holder because of such QEF Election and (b) will adjust such U.S. Holder's tax basis in the Common Shares to reflect the amount included in income or allowed as a tax-free distribution because of such QEF Election.  In addition, a U.S. Holder that makes a QEF Election generally will recognize capital gain or loss on the sale or other taxable disposition of Common Shares.

74


The procedure for making a QEF Election, and the U.S. federal income tax consequences of making a QEF Election, will depend on whether such QEF Election is timely.  A QEF Election will be treated as "timely" if such QEF Election is made for the first year in the U.S. Holder's holding period for the Common Shares in which the Company was a PFIC.  A U.S. Holder may make a timely QEF Election by filing the appropriate QEF Election documents at the time such U.S. Holder files a U.S. federal income tax return for such year.  If a U.S. Holder does not make a timely and effective QEF Election for the first year in the U.S. Holder's holding period for the Common Shares, the U.S. Holder may still be able to make a timely and effective QEF Election in a subsequent year if such U.S. Holder meets certain requirements and makes a "purging" election to recognize gain (which will be taxed under the rules of Section 1291 of the Code discussed above) as if such Common Shares were sold for their fair market value on the day the QEF Election is effective.  If a U.S. Holder owns PFIC stock indirectly through another PFIC, separate QEF Elections must be made for the PFIC in which the U.S. Holder is a direct shareholder and the Subsidiary PFIC for the QEF rules to apply to both PFICs.

A QEF Election will apply to the tax year for which such QEF Election is timely made and to all subsequent tax years, unless such QEF Election is invalidated or terminated or the IRS consents to revocation of such QEF Election.  If a U.S. Holder makes a QEF Election and, in a subsequent tax year, the Company ceases to be a PFIC, the QEF Election will remain in effect (although it will not be applicable) during those tax years in which the Company is not a PFIC.  Accordingly, if the Company becomes a PFIC in another subsequent tax year, the QEF Election will be effective and the U.S. Holder will be subject to the QEF rules described above during any subsequent tax year in which the Company qualifies as a PFIC.

U.S. Holders should be aware that there can be no assurances that the Company will satisfy the record keeping requirements that apply to a QEF, or that the Company will supply U.S. Holders with a PFIC Annual Information Statement or other information that such U.S. Holders are required to report under the QEF rules, in the event that the Company is a PFIC.  Thus, U.S. Holders may not be able to make a QEF Election with respect to their Common Shares.  Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the availability of, and procedure for making, a QEF Election.

A U.S. Holder makes a QEF Election by attaching a completed IRS Form 8621, including a PFIC Annual Information Statement, to a timely filed United States federal income tax return.  However, if the Company cannot provide the required information with regard to the Company or any of its Subsidiary PFICs, U.S. Holders will not be able to make a QEF Election for such entity and will continue to be subject to the rules discussed above that apply to Non-Electing U.S. Holders with respect to the taxation of gains and excess distributions. 

Mark-to-Market Election

A U.S. Holder may make a Mark-to-Market Election only if the Common Shares are marketable stock.  The Common Shares generally will be "marketable stock" if the Common Shares are regularly traded on (a) a national securities exchange that is registered with the SEC, (b) the national market system established pursuant to section 11A of the U.S. Exchange Act, or (c) a foreign securities exchange that is regulated or supervised by a governmental authority of the country in which the market is located, provided that (i) such foreign exchange has trading volume, listing, financial disclosure, and surveillance requirements, and meets other requirements and the laws of the country in which such foreign exchange is located, together with the rules of such foreign exchange, ensure that such requirements are actually enforced and (ii) the rules of such foreign exchange effectively promote active trading of listed stocks.  If such stock is traded on such a qualified exchange or other market, such stock generally will be "regularly traded" for any calendar year during which such stock is traded, other than in de minimis quantities, on at least 15 days during each calendar quarter.

75


A U.S. Holder that makes a Mark-to-Market Election with respect to its Common Shares generally will not be subject to the rules of Section 1291 of the Code discussed above with respect to such Common Shares.  However, if a U.S. Holder does not make a Mark-to-Market Election beginning in the first tax year of such U.S. Holder's holding period for the Common Shares or such U.S. Holder has not made a timely QEF Election, the rules of Section 1291 of the Code discussed above will apply to certain dispositions of, and distributions on, the Common Shares.

A U.S. Holder that makes a Mark-to-Market Election will include in ordinary income, for each tax year in which the Company is a PFIC, an amount equal to the excess, if any, of (a) the fair market value of the Common Shares, as of the close of such tax year over (b) such U.S. Holder's tax basis in such Common Shares.  A U.S. Holder that makes a Mark-to-Market Election will be allowed a deduction in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of (a) such U.S. Holder's adjusted tax basis in the Common Shares, over (b) the fair market value of such Common Shares (but only to the extent of the net amount of previously included income as a result of the Mark-to-Market Election for prior tax years).

A U.S. Holder that makes a Mark-to-Market Election generally also will adjust such U.S. Holder's tax basis in the Common Shares to reflect the amount included in gross income or allowed as a deduction because of such Mark-to-Market Election.  In addition, upon a sale or other taxable disposition of Common Shares, a U.S. Holder that makes a Mark-to-Market Election will recognize ordinary income or ordinary loss (not to exceed the excess, if any, of (a) the amount included in ordinary income because of such Mark-to-Market Election for prior tax years over (b) the amount allowed as a deduction because of such Mark-to-Market Election for prior tax years).  Losses that exceed this limitation are subject to the rules generally applicable to losses provided in the Code and Treasury Regulations.

A Mark-to-Market Election applies to the tax year in which such Mark-to-Market Election is made and to each subsequent tax year, unless the Common Shares cease to be "marketable stock" or the IRS consents to revocation of such election.  Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the availability of, and procedure for making, a Mark-to-Market Election.

A U.S. Holder makes a Mark-to-Market Election by attaching a completed IRS Form 8621 to a timely filed U.S. federal income tax return. A timely Mark-to-Market Election applies to the tax year in which such Mark-to-Market Election is made and to each subsequent tax year, unless the Common Shares cease to be "marketable stock" or the IRS consents to revocation of such election.  Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the availability of, and procedure for making, a Mark-to-Market Election.

Other PFIC Rules

Under Section 1291(f) of the Code, the IRS has issued proposed Treasury Regulations that, subject to certain exceptions, would cause a U.S. Holder that had not made a timely QEF Election to recognize gain (but not loss) upon certain transfers of Common Shares that would otherwise be tax-deferred (e.g., gifts and exchanges pursuant to corporate reorganizations).  However, the specific U.S. federal income tax consequences to a U.S. Holder may vary based on the manner in which Common Shares are transferred.

Certain additional adverse rules may apply with respect to a U.S. Holder if the Company is a PFIC, regardless of whether such U.S. Holder makes a QEF Election.  For example, under Section 1298(b)(6) of the Code, a U.S. Holder that uses Common Shares as security for a loan will, except as may be provided in Treasury Regulations, be treated as having made a taxable disposition of such Common Shares.

76


In addition, a U.S. Holder who acquires Common Shares from a decedent will not receive a "step up" in tax basis of such Common Shares to fair market value.

Special rules also apply to the amount of foreign tax credit that a U.S. Holder may claim on a distribution from a PFIC.  Subject to such special rules, foreign taxes paid with respect to any distribution in respect of stock in a PFIC are generally eligible for the foreign tax credit.  The rules relating to distributions by a PFIC and their eligibility for the foreign tax credit are complicated, and a U.S. Holder should consult with its own tax advisor regarding the availability of the foreign tax credit with respect to distributions by a PFIC.

The PFIC rules are complex, and each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisors regarding the PFIC rules (including the applicability and advisability of a QEF Election or Mark-to-Market Election) and how the PFIC rules may affect the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Common Shares.

Ownership and Disposition of Common Shares

The following discussion is subject in its entirety to the rules described above under the heading "Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules."

Distributions on Common Shares

A U.S. Holder that receives a distribution, including a constructive distribution, with respect to a Common Share will be required to include the amount of such distribution in gross income as a dividend (without reduction for any Canadian income tax withheld from such distribution) to the extent of the current or accumulated "earnings and profits" of the Company, as computed for U.S. federal income tax purposes.  A dividend generally will be taxed to a U.S. Holder at ordinary income tax rates if the Company is a PFIC for the tax year of such distribution or the preceding tax year.  To the extent that a distribution exceeds the current and accumulated "earnings and profits" of the Company, such distribution will be treated first as a tax-free return of capital to the extent of a U.S. Holder's tax basis in the Common Shares and thereafter as gain from the sale or exchange of such Common Shares.  (See "Sale or Other Taxable Disposition of Common Shares" below).  However, the Company may not maintain the calculations of earnings and profits in accordance with U.S. federal income tax principles, and each U.S. Holder should therefore assume that any distribution by the Company with respect to the Common Shares will constitute ordinary dividend income.  Dividends received on Common Shares generally will not be eligible for the "dividends received deduction" generally applicable to corporations.  Subject to applicable limitations and provided the Company is eligible for the benefits of the Canada-U.S. Tax Convention or the Common Shares are readily tradable on a United States securities market, dividends paid by the Company to non-corporate U.S. Holders, including individuals, generally will be eligible for the preferential tax rates applicable to long-term capital gains for dividends, provided certain holding period and other conditions are satisfied, including that the Company not be classified as a PFIC in the tax year of distribution or in the preceding tax year.  The dividend rules are complex, and each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the application of such rules.

Sale or Other Taxable Disposition of Common Shares

Upon the sale or other taxable disposition of Common Shares, a U.S. Holder generally will recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the U.S. dollar value of cash received plus the fair market value of any property received and such U.S. Holder's tax basis in such Common Shares sold or otherwise disposed of.  A U.S. Holder's tax basis in Common Shares generally will be such holder's U.S. dollar cost for such Common Shares.  Gain or loss recognized on such sale or other disposition generally will be long-term capital gain or loss if, at the time of the sale or other disposition, the Common Shares have been held for more than one year.

77


Preferential tax rates currently apply to long-term capital gain of a U.S. Holder that is an individual, estate, or trust.  There are currently no preferential tax rates for long-term capital gain of a U.S. Holder that is a corporation.  Deductions for capital losses are subject to significant limitations under the Code.

Additional Considerations

Receipt of Foreign Currency

The amount of any distribution paid to a U.S. Holder in foreign currency, or on the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of Common Shares, generally will be equal to the U.S. dollar value of such foreign currency based on the exchange rate applicable on the date of receipt (regardless of whether such foreign currency is converted into U.S. dollars at that time).  If the foreign currency is not converted into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, a U.S. Holder will have a basis in the foreign currency equal to its U.S. dollar value on the date of receipt.  Any U.S. Holder who converts or otherwise disposes of the foreign currency after the date of receipt may have a foreign currency exchange gain or loss that would be treated as ordinary income or loss, and generally will be U.S. source income or loss for foreign tax credit purposes.  Different rules apply to U.S. Holders who use the accrual method of tax accounting.  Each U.S. Holder should consult its own U.S. tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of receiving, owning, and disposing of foreign currency.

Foreign Tax Credit

Subject to the PFIC rules discussed above, a U.S. Holder that pays (whether directly or through withholding) Canadian income tax with respect to dividends paid on the Common Shares generally will be entitled, at the election of such U.S. Holder, to receive either a deduction or a credit for such Canadian income tax.  Generally, a credit will reduce a U.S. Holder's U.S. federal income tax liability on a dollar-for-dollar basis, whereas a deduction will reduce a U.S. Holder's income subject to U.S. federal income tax.  This election is made on a year-by-year basis and applies to all foreign taxes paid (whether directly or through withholding) by a U.S. Holder during a year.  The foreign tax credit rules are complex and involve the application of rules that depend on a U.S. Holder's particular circumstances.  Each U.S. Holder should consult its own U.S. tax advisor regarding the foreign tax credit rules.

Backup Withholding and Information Reporting

Under U.S. federal income tax law and Treasury Regulations, certain categories of U.S. Holders must file information returns with respect to their investment in, or involvement in, a foreign corporation.  For example, U.S. return disclosure obligations (and related penalties) are imposed on individuals who are U.S. Holders that hold certain specified foreign financial assets in excess of certain threshold amounts.  The definition of specified foreign financial assets includes not only financial accounts maintained in foreign financial institutions, but also, unless held in accounts maintained by a financial institution, any stock or security issued by a non-U.S. person, any financial instrument or contract held for investment that has an issuer or counterparty other than a U.S. person and any interest in a foreign entity.  U.S. Holders may be subject to these reporting requirements unless their Common Shares are held in an account at certain financial institutions.  Penalties for failure to file certain of these information returns are substantial.  U.S. Holders should consult with their own tax advisors regarding the requirements of filing information returns, including the requirement to file an IRS Form 8938.

78


Payments made within the U.S. or by a U.S. payor or U.S. middleman, of dividends on, and proceeds arising from the sale or other taxable disposition of, Common Shares will generally be subject to information reporting and backup withholding tax, currently at the rate of 24%, if a U.S. Holder (a) fails to furnish such U.S. Holder's correct U.S. taxpayer identification number (generally on IRS Form W-9), (b) furnishes an incorrect U.S. taxpayer identification number, (c) is notified by the IRS that such U.S. Holder has previously failed to properly report items subject to backup withholding tax, or (d) fails to certify, under penalty of perjury, that such U.S. Holder has furnished its correct U.S. taxpayer identification number and that the IRS has not notified such U.S. Holder that it is subject to backup withholding tax.  However, certain exempt persons generally are excluded from these information reporting and backup withholding rules.  Backup withholding is not an additional tax.  Any amounts withheld under the U.S. backup withholding tax rules will be allowed as a credit against a U.S. Holder's U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, or will be refunded, if such U.S. Holder furnishes required information to the IRS in a timely manner. 

The discussion of reporting requirements set forth above is not intended to constitute a complete description of all reporting requirements that may apply to a U.S. Holder. A failure to satisfy certain reporting requirements may result in an extension of the time period during which the IRS can assess a tax and under certain circumstances, such an extension may apply to assessments of amounts unrelated to any unsatisfied reporting requirement. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the information reporting and backup withholding rules.

THE ABOVE SUMMARY IS NOT INTENDED TO CONSTITUTE A COMPLETE ANALYSIS OF ALL TAX CONSIDERATIONS APPLICABLE TO U.S. HOLDERS WITH RESPECT TO THE ACQUISITION, OWNERSHIP, AND DISPOSITION OF COMMON SHARES. U.S. HOLDERS SHOULD CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISORS AS TO THE TAX CONSIDERATIONS APPLICABLE TO THEM IN THEIR OWN PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES.

F.  Dividends and Paying Agents

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the U.S. Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.

G.  Statement By Experts

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the U.S. Exchange Act and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.

H.  Documents on Display

The documents referred to and/or incorporated by reference in this Form 20-F can be viewed at the office of the Company at 1 First Canadian Place, 100 King Street West, Suite 7070, Toronto, Ontario, M5X 1E3, Canada.  The Company is required to file financial statements and other information with the securities regulatory authorities in each of the Canadian provinces (other than Quebec), electronically through the Canadian System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR), which can be viewed at www.sedar.com.  The Company is subject to the informational requirements of the U.S. Exchange Act and files reports and other information with the SEC.  The SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. 

79


I.  Subsidiary Information

Not applicable. 

Item 11.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

See Note 17 to the Company's audited consolidated financial statements filed as part of this Form 20-F under Item 18. 

Item 12.  Descriptions of Securities Other than Equity Securities

Not applicable. 

PART II

Item 13.  Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies.

Not applicable. 

Item 14.  Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds.

14.A.-D.  Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders

The Company was formed under the OBCA on August 24, 1993 by articles of amalgamation.  The name of the Company upon amalgamation was Taylor Rand Incorporated.  On June 25, 1996, pursuant to the filing of articles of amendment, the Company changed its name from Taylor Rand Incorporated to Sheridan Reserve Incorporated and consolidated its outstanding common shares.  Articles of amendment were filed by the Company on January 28, 1997 to consolidate its outstanding series of preference shares.  The Company changed its name from Sheridan Reserve Incorporated to Nevadabobs.com Inc. on August 4, 2000 pursuant to the filing of articles of amendment.  The Company changed its name from Nevadabobs.com Inc. to Nevada Bob's International Inc. on August 24, 2001 pursuant to articles of amendment.  Articles of amendment were filed by the Company on May 6, 2002 to consolidate its outstanding common shares.  Articles of amendment were filed by the Company on April 30, 2003 to create a series of preference shares.  On November 28, 2008, immediately following the acquisition by the Company of Old Loncor, the Company filed articles of amalgamation which amalgamated the Company with Old Loncor and changed the Company's name from Nevada Bob's International Inc. to Loncor Resources Inc.  Pursuant to articles of amendment dated September 19, 2019, the Company consolidated its outstanding common shares on a two to one basis.  All amounts in this Form 20-F have been adjusted to reflect this share consolidation.  The Company changed its name from Loncor Resources Inc. to Loncor Gold Inc. on June 7, 2021 pursuant to articles of amendment. 

14.E.  Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

80


Item 15.  Controls and Procedures.

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the U.S. Exchange Act) for the year ended December 31, 2021.  Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were adequately designed and are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the U.S. Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in applicable rules and forms.

In addition, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have determined that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that are filed under the U.S. Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b) Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The Company's management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the U.S. Exchange Act.  The Company's management has employed a framework consistent with U.S. Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(c), to evaluate the Company's internal control over financial reporting described below.  The Company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board ("IFRS").

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management conducted an evaluation of the design and operation of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2021 based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.  This evaluation included review of the documentation of controls, evaluation of the design effectiveness of controls, testing of the operating effectiveness of controls and a conclusion on this evaluation.  Based on this evaluation, management has concluded that the Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2021 and no material weaknesses were discovered.

(c) Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm

This annual report on Form 20-F does not include an attestation report of the Company's registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.  Under the Jumpstart Our Business & Startups Act ("JOBS Act"), emerging growth companies are exempt from Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which generally requires public companies to provide an independent auditor attestation of management's assessment of the effectiveness of their internal control over financial reporting.  The Company qualifies as an emerging growth company under the JOBS Act and therefore has not included an independent auditor attestation of management's assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting.

81


(d) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting during the year ended December 31, 2021, that management believes have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

The Company's management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that its disclosure controls and procedures or internal controls and procedures will prevent all error and all fraud.  A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.  Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs.  Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.  These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.  Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control.  The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.  Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Item 16.A.  Audit Committee Financial Expert

The Company's Board has determined that William R. Wilson satisfies the requirements as an audit committee financial expert, in that he has an understanding of IFRS and financial statements; is able to assess the general application of such principles in connection with the accounting for estimates, accruals and reserves; has experience preparing, auditing, analyzing or evaluating financial statements that present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by the Company's financial statements (or experience actively supervising one or more persons engaged in such activities); has an understanding of internal controls over financial reporting; and has an understanding of audit committee functions.  Mr. Wilson is independent as defined in Section 803A of the NYSE American LLC Company Guide.

Item 16.B.  Code of Ethics.

The Company has adopted a code of business conduct and ethics for directors, officers and employees (including the Company's principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer) (the "Code").  A copy of the Code is incorporated by reference into this Form 20-F as Exhibit 1.4.  A copy of the Code may also be obtained free of charge from the Chief Financial Officer of the Company at dmadilo@loncor.com and is also available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com, EDGAR at www.sec.gov and the Company's website at www.loncor.com.  Each director, officer and employee of the Company is provided with a copy of the Code and is required to confirm annually that he or she has complied with the Code.  Any observed breaches of the Code must be reported to the Company's Chief Executive Officer.

82


No amendment was made to the Code during the Company's most recently completed financial year and no waiver from a provision of the Code was granted by the Company during the Company's most recently completed financial year.

In accordance with the OBCA (the Company's governing corporate legislation), directors of the Company who are a party to, or are a director or an officer of or have a material interest in a party to, a material contract or material transaction or a proposed material contract or proposed material transaction, are required to disclose the nature and extent of their interest and not to vote on any resolution to approve the contract or transaction.  In addition, in certain cases, an independent committee of the Company's Board may be formed to deliberate on such matters in the absence of the interested party. 

The Company has also adopted a "whistleblower" policy which provides employees, consultants, officers and directors with the ability to report, on a confidential and anonymous basis, violations within the Company's organization including, (but not limited to), questionable accounting practices, disclosure of fraudulent or misleading financial information, instances of corporate fraud, or harassment.  The Company believes that providing a forum for such individuals to raise concerns about ethical conduct and treating all complaints with the appropriate level of seriousness fosters a culture of ethical business conduct.  The Company has also adopted an insider trading policy to encourage and promote a culture of ethical business conduct. 

Item 16.C.  Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The following summarizes the total fees billed by Kreston GTA LLP, Markham, Ontario, Canada (PCAOB ID 6644), the external auditors of the Company, for each of the years ended December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020.  All dollar amounts are exclusive of applicable taxes. 

  2021 2020
Audit Fees Cdn$45,000 Cdn$45,000
Audit-Related Fees Nil Nil
Tax Fees Cdn$5,000 Cdn$5,000
All Other Fees Nil Nil

In accordance with existing Audit Committee policy and the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, all services to be provided by the external auditors of the Company are subject to pre-approval by the Audit Committee.  This includes audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services.  In some cases, pre-approval is provided by the full Audit Committee for up to a year, and relates to a particular category or group of services and is subject to a specific budget.  All of the fees listed above have been approved by the Audit Committee. 

Item 16.D.  Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees

Not applicable.

Item 16.E.  Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

The Company did not purchase any of its common shares during the financial year ended December 31, 2021.

83


Item 16.F.  Change in Registrant's Certifying Accountant

Not applicable.

Item 16.G.  Corporate Governance

Not applicable.

Item 16.H.  Mine Safety Disclosure

Not applicable.

Item 16.I.  Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections.

Not applicable.

PART III

Item 17.  Financial Statements

Not applicable.

Item 18.  Financial Statements

The financial statements appear on pages F-1 through F-37. 

Item 19.  Exhibits 

The following exhibits are filed as part of this Form 20-F:

EXHIBIT
NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
  Constating Documents
1.1 Company's articles of amalgamation (1)
1.2 Company's general by-law (1)
1.3 Audit Committee's charter (1)
1.4 Company's Business Conduct Policy (1)
1.5 Company's articles of amendment (1A)
1.6 Company's articles of amendment (1B)
   
  Registered Securities
2.1 Description of the registered securities
   
  Material Contracts
4.1 Company's stock option plan

 

84


  Subsidiaries
8.1 List of subsidiaries of the Company
   
  Certifications
12.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
12.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
13.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
13.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   
  Other Exhibits
15.1 Management's discussion and analysis of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2021
15.2 Consent of Daniel Bansah for Technical Report Summary on the Mineral Resources of the Imbo Project
15.3 Consent of Christian Bawah for Technical Report Summary on the Mineral Resources of the Imbo Project
15.4 Technical Report Summary on the Mineral Resources of the Imbo Projec
   
  XBRL
101.INS Inline XBRL Instance Document–the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File as its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document
101.SCH Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
104 Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101).

Notes:

(1) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company's annual report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC on March 30, 2012.  SEC file number 001-35124. 

(1A) Previously filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Company's current report on Form 6-K filed with the SEC on April 3, 2020.

(1B) Previously filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Company's current report on Form 6-K filed with the SEC on April 19, 2022.

85


SIGNATURES

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.

Date: April 29, 2022 

  LONCOR GOLD INC.
  (Registrant)
     
     
  By: (signed) "John Barker"   
    John Barker
    Chief Executive Officer

 


 

 

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2021

(Expressed in U.S. Dollars - audited)

 

 

F-1


Contents

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Management's Report 3
   
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 4
   
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position 5
   
Consolidated Statements of Loss and Comprehensive Loss 7
   
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity 8
   
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 9
   
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
   
1. Corporate Information 10
   
2. Basis of Preparation 10
   
3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies 11
   
4. Acquisitions 21
   
5. Subsidiaries 23
   
6. Advances receivable and prepaid expenses 23
   
7. Related party transactions 23
   
8. Property, Plant and Equipment 24
   
9. Exploration and Evaluation Assets 25
   
10. Intangible Assets 26
   
11. Segmented Reporting 26
   
12. Accounts Payable 27
   
13. Loans 27
   
14. Share Capital 28
   
15. Share-Based Payments 30
   
16. Lease obligations 31
   
17. Financial risk management objectives and policies 32
   
18. Supplemental cash flow information 35
   
19. Employee retention allowance 35
   
20. Income taxes 35
   
21. Government Assistance 37
   
22. Events after the reporting period 37
 

F-2


Management's Report

Management's Responsibility for Financial Statements

The consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards and are the responsibility of the management of Loncor Gold Inc. (the "Company"). The financial information presented elsewhere in the Management's Discussion and Analysis is consistent with the data that is contained in the consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements, where necessary, include amounts which are based on the best estimates and judgments of management.

In order to discharge management's responsibility for the integrity of the consolidated financial statements, the Company maintains a system of internal controls. These controls are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the Company's assets are safeguarded, transactions are executed and recorded in accordance with management's authorization, proper records are maintained and relevant and reliable information is produced.  These controls include maintaining quality standards in hiring and training of employees, policies and procedures manuals, a corporate code of conduct and ensuring that there is proper accountability for performance within appropriate and well-defined areas of responsibility. The system of internal controls is further supported by a compliance function, which is designed to ensure that we and our employees comply with securities legislation and conflict of interest rules.

The Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing management's performance of its responsibilities for financial reporting and internal control. The Audit Committee, which is composed of non-executive directors, meets with management as well as the external auditors to ensure that management is properly fulfilling its financial reporting responsibilities to the Directors who approve the consolidated financial statements. The external auditors have full and unrestricted access to the Audit Committee to discuss the scope of their audits, the adequacy of the system of internal controls and review reporting issues.

The consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2021 have been audited by Kreston GTA LLP, Chartered Professional Accountants and Licensed Public Accountants, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).

 

(Signed) "John Barker"   (Signed) "Donat K. Madilo"
     
John Barker   Donat K. Madilo
     
Chief Executive Officer   Chief Financial Officer

 

F-3



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and Directors of Loncor Gold Inc.

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statement of financial position of Loncor Gold Inc. (the "Company") as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, and the related consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "consolidated financial statements").

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, and its financial performance and its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern

We draw attention to Note 2 in the consolidated financial statements, which describe the events and conditions that indicate the existence of material uncertainties that may cast significant doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Our opinion is not modified in respect of this matter.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2019.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

F-4


Impairment assessment of exploration and evaluation assets - Refer to Note 9 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

We identified the impairment assessment of exploration and evaluation assets as a key audit matter due to significant auditor and management judgement and estimation involved in determining the recoverable amount. As disclosed in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements, the carrying value of the Company's exploration and evaluation assets were approximately $38 million as at December 31, 2021. As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the carrying value of exploration and evaluation is reviewed each reporting period to determine whether there is any indication of impairment or reversal of impairment.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our primary procedures to address this critical audit matter include i) testing the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls related to the Company's process to assess indicators of impairment or reversal of impairment; ii) evaluating the appropriateness of the methods and valuation models used; and iii) evaluating the reasonableness of the significant assumptions used by management. We also assessed the competence, capabilities and objectivity of the Company's personnel involved in preparing the impairment assessment.

Chartered Professional Accountants

Licensed Public Accountants

Markham, Canada

March 31, 2022

Kreston GTA LLP 6644

 

F-5


Loncor Gold Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION

(Expressed in U.S. dollars)

 
  Notes   December 31, 2021     December 31, 2020  
      $     $  
Assets              
Current Assets              
Cash and cash equivalents
    154,154     256,624  
Advances receivable and prepaid expenses
6   345,193     236,667  
Due from related parties
7   285,074     26,474  
Total Current Assets     784,421     519,765  
               
Non-Current Assets              
Property, plant and equipment
8   1,269,434     527,904  
Exploration and evaluation assets
9   38,271,725     31,623,192  
Intangible assets
10   -     1  
Total Non-Current Assets     39,541,159     32,151,097  
               
Total Assets     40,325,580     32,670,862  
               
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity              
Current Liabilities
             
Accounts payable
12   1,488,379     715,452  
Accrued liabilities
    83,663     221,634  
Due to related parties
7   67,477     284,920  
Employee retention allowance
19   184,951     184,159  
Lease obligation - current portion
16   138,684     188,370  
Loans - current portion
13   -     11,650  
Current Liabilities     1,963,154     1,606,185  
               
Lease obligation - long-term portion
16   -     159,874  
Loans - long-term portion
13   27,602     26,501  
Total Liabilities     1,990,756     1,792,560  
               
Shareholders' Equity              
Share capital
14   94,480,512     85,147,700  
Reserves
    10,787,553     8,940,059  
Deficit
    (66,933,241 )   (63,209,457 )
Total Shareholders' Equity     38,334,824     30,878,302  
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity     40,325,580     32,670,862  
               
Common shares              
Authorized
    Unlimited     Unlimited  
Issued and outstanding
14b   135,099,174     112,224,174  

Approved and authorized for issue by the Board of Directors on March 30, 2022.
Signed on behalf of the Board of Directors by:

/s/ William R. Wilson /s/ Arnold T. Kondrat
   
William R. Wilson Arnold T. Kondrat
Director Director

Going concern (Note 2b)

Event after the reporting period (Note 22)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-6

Loncor Gold Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF LOSS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(Expressed in U.S. dollars)
 
      For the year ended  
  Notes   December 31, 2021     December 31, 2020     December 31, 2019  
      $     $     $  
Expenses                    
Consulting, management and professional fees
    887,058     898,831     794,481  
Employee benefits
    1,097,977     555,150     358,794  
Office and sundry
    232,011     128,323     68,290  
Share-based payments
14   782,815     289,665     154,789  
Travel and promotion
    277,448     240,320     111,965  
Depreciation
8, 16   175,075     185,348     196,694  
Interest and bank expenses
    22,267     11,781     4,421  
Interest on lease obligation
16   9,320     21,393     35,419  
Fair value gain on government loan
13   -     (5,206 )   -  
(Gain) loss on derivative instruments
    -     (31,888 )   30,349  
Impairment of exploration and evaluation assets
9   452,251     -     -  
Foreign exchange (gain) loss
    (44,084 )   49,927     11,236  
Loss before other items
    (3,892,138 )   (2,343,644 )   (1,766,438 )
Interest and other income 6,16, 21   168,354     100,084     115,693  
Loss and comprehensive loss for the year     (3,723,784 )   (2,243,560 )   (1,650,745 )
                     
Loss per share, basic and diluted 14d   (0.03 )   (0.02 )   (0.02 )
                     
Weighted average number of shares - basic and diluted 14d   127,374,340     105,203,090     93,885,097  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-7


Loncor Gold Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Expressed in U.S. dollars)
                         
    Common shares     Reserves     Deficit     Total
shareholders'
equity
 
    Number of
shares
    Amount  
Balance at January 1, 2019   93,694,956   $ 79,376,206   $ 8,221,178   $ (59,315,152 ) $ 28,282,232  
Loss for the year   -     -     -     (1,650,745 )   (1,650,745 )
Share-based payments (Note 15)   -     -     190,469     -     190,469  
Common shares issued   1,586,023     465,080     -     -     465,080  
Balance at December 31, 2019   95,280,979   $ 79,841,286   $ 8,411,647   $ (60,965,897 ) $ 27,287,036  
                               
Loss for the year   -     -     -     (2,243,560 )   (2,243,560 )
Share-based payments (Note 15)   -     -     528,412     -     528,412  
Common shares issued (Note 14b)   16,943,195     5,306,414     -     -     5,306,414  
Balance at December 31, 2020   112,224,174   $ 85,147,700   $ 8,940,059   $ (63,209,457 ) $ 30,878,302  
                               
Loss for the year   -     -     -     (3,723,784 )   (3,723,784 )
Common shares issued with warrants (Note 14b)   19,350,000     7,838,542     1,024,032     -     8,862,574  
Issuance costs (Note 14b)   -     (422,780 )   -     -     (422,780 )
Warrants exercised (Note 14c)   2,400,000     1,692,211     (274,013 )   -     1,418,198  
Stock options exercised (Note 15)   1,125,000     224,839     (83,589 )   -     141,250  
Share-based payments (Note 15)               1,181,064     -     1,181,064  
Balance at December 31, 2021   135,099,174   $ 94,480,512   $ 10,787,553   $ (66,933,241 ) $ 38,334,824  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-8

Loncor Gold Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Expressed in U.S. dollars)
 
      For the year ended  
  Notes   December 30, 2021     December 31, 2020     December 31, 2019  
      $     $     $  
Cash flows from operating activities                    
Loss for the year     (3,723,784 )   (2,243,560 )   (1,650,745 )
Adjustments to reconcile loss to net cash used in operating activities                  
   Depreciation     175,075     185,348     196,694  
   Share-based payments 15   1,172,152     450,912     519,549  
   Impairment of exploration and evaluation assets 9   452,251     -     -  
   Accretion expense on government loan 13   985     623     -  
   Fair value gain on government loan     -     (5,062 )   -  
   Gain on derivative instruments 14   -     (31,888 )   30,349  
   Interest on lease obligation 16   9,320     21,393     35,419  
   Other non-cash adjustments     (1,940 )   -     -  
Changes in non-cash working capital                    
   Advances receivable and prepaid expenses     (108,526 )   (172,772 )   (13,314 )
   Due from related parties     (258,600 )   (26,474 )   -  
   Employee retention allowance 19   792     3,640     8,652  
   Accounts payable     772,927     379,196     35,974  
   Accrued liabilities     (137,971 )   33,082     (41,001 )
Net cash used in operating activities     (1,647,318 )   (1,405,562 )   (878,423 )
                     
Cash flows from investing activities                    
Acquisition of subsidiary, net of cash acquired 4   -     -     (97,525 )
Acquisition of additional interest in subsidiary 4   -     (140,000 )   -  
Acquisition of mineral properties     -     -     -  
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment     (943,110 )   -     -  
Expenditures on exploration and evaluation assets     (7,072,338 )   (2,796,013 )   (227,089 )
Net cash used in investing activities     (8,015,448 )   (2,936,013 )   (324,614 )
                     
Cash flows from financing activities                    
Proceeds from share issuances, net of issuance costs     10,008,154     5,383,914     136,000  
Loans received (repaid) 13   (11,534 )   15,316     (12,767 )
Principal repayment of lease obligation 16   (218,880 )   (213,183 )   (183,342 )
Due to related parties     (217,443 )   (665,544 )   689,940  
Net cash provided from financing activities     9,560,297     4,520,503     629,831  
                     
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents during the year     (102,470 )   178,928     (573,206 )
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the year     256,624     77,696     650,902  
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the year     154,154     256,624     77,696  


Supplemental cash flow information (Note 18)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-9


Loncor Gold Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

(Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share amounts)

1. Corporate Information

Loncor Gold Inc. (the "Company" or "Loncor") is a corporation governed by the Ontario Business Corporations Act. In June 2021, the Company changed its name from Loncor Resources Inc. to Loncor Gold Inc. The principal business of the Company is the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties.

These consolidated financial statements as at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 include the accounts of the Company and of its wholly owned subsidiaries in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (the "Congo"), Loncor Resources Congo SARL, and in Canada, Loncor Kilo Inc. Loncor Resources Congo SARL owns 100% of the common shares of Devon Resources SARL and 100% of Navarro Resources SARL.

Loncor Kilo Inc. owns 84.68% of the outstanding shares of Adumbi Mining S.A. ("Adumbi"), a company registered in the Congo which changed its name from KGL-Somituri SARL in January 2020, and 100% of the common shares of Kilo Isiro Atlantic Ltd (a British Virgin Islands company). Kilo Isiro Atlantic Ltd owns 100% of the shares of Isiro (Jersey) Limited which in turn owns 100% of the shares of KGL Isiro SARL in the Congo.

The Company is a publicly traded company whose outstanding common shares trade on the Toronto Stock Exchange, the OTCQX market in the United States and the Frankfurt Stock Exchange. The head office of the Company is located at 1 First Canadian Place, 100 King St. West, Suite 7070, Toronto, Ontario, M5X 1E3, Canada.

2. Basis of Preparation

a)    Statement of compliance

These consolidated financial statements as at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board ("IASB").

The accompanying financial information as at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 has been prepared in accordance with those IASB standards and IFRS Interpretations Committee ("IFRIC") interpretations issued and effective, or issued and early-adopted, at December 31, 2021.

The date the Company's Board of Directors approved these consolidated financial statements was March 30, 2022.

b)    Going Concern

The Company incurred a net loss of $3,723,784 for the year ended December 31, 2021 (year ended December 31, 2020 - net loss of $2,243,560 and year ended December 31, 2019 - net loss of $1,650,745) and as at December 31, 2021 had a working capital deficit of $1,178,733 (December 31, 2020: a working capital deficit of $1,086,420).

In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared coronavirus COVID-19 a global pandemic. This contagious disease outbreak, which has continued to spread, and any related adverse public health developments, has adversely affected workforces, economies, and financial markets globally, potentially leading to an economic downturn. It is not possible for the Company to predict the duration or magnitude of the adverse results of the outbreak and its effects on the Company's business or ability to raise funds.

Management is closely monitoring the impact of COVID-19 on the Company's business, including the impact on employees, operations, supplies, liquidity and capital resources. In order for the Company to continue as a going concern and fund its operations, the Company will require additional financing. The availability of financing will be affected by, among other things, the state of the capital markets considering the impact of COVID-19 and strategic partnership arrangements. The recoverability of the amount shown for exploration and evaluation assets is dependent upon the existence of economically recoverable reserves, the ability of the Company to obtain financing to continue to perform exploration activity or complete the development of the properties where necessary, or alternatively, upon the Company's ability to recover its incurred costs through a disposition of its interests, all of which are uncertain.

F-10


Loncor Gold Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

(Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share amounts)

In addition, if the Company raises additional funds by issuing equity securities, then existing security holders will likely experience dilution, and the incurring of indebtedness would result in increased debt service obligations and could require the Company to agree to operating and financial covenants that would restrict its operations. Any failure on its part to raise additional funds on terms favourable to the Company or at all, may require the Company to significantly change or curtail its current or planned operations in order to conserve cash until such time, if ever, that sufficient proceeds from operations are generated, and could result in the Company not taking advantage of other available business opportunities.

In the event the Company is unable to identify recoverable resources, receive the necessary permitting, or arrange appropriate financing, the carrying value of the Company's assets and liabilities could be subject to material adjustment. These matters create material uncertainties that cast significant and substantial doubt upon the validity of the going concern assumption.

These consolidated financial statements do not include any additional adjustments to the recoverability and classification of certain recorded asset amounts, classification of certain liabilities and changes to the statements of loss and comprehensive loss that might be necessary if the Company was unable to continue as a going concern.

c)    Basis of measurement

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis, except for certain financial assets and liabilities which are presented at fair value. These consolidated financial statements have also been prepared on an accrual basis, except for cash flow information.

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The accounting policies set out below have been applied consistently by all group entities and to all periods presented in these consolidated financial statements, unless otherwise indicated.

a) Basis of Consolidation

i. Subsidiaries

Subsidiaries consist of entities over which the Company is exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns as well as ability to offset these returns through the power to direct the relevant activities of the entity. This control is generally evidenced through owning more than 50% of the voting rights or currently exercisable potential voting rights of a company's share capital. The financial statements of subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company from the date that control commences until the date that control ceases. Consolidation accounting is applied for all of the Company's wholly-owned subsidiaries (see note 5).

ii. Transactions eliminated on consolidation

Inter-company balances, transactions, and any unrealized income and expenses, are eliminated in preparing the consolidated financial statements.

Unrealized gains arising from transactions with associates are eliminated against the investment to the extent of the Company's interest in the investee. Unrealized losses are eliminated in the same way as unrealized gains, but only to the extent that there is no evidence of impairment.

F-11


Loncor Gold Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

(Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share amounts)

b) Use of Estimates and Judgments

The preparation of these consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimates are revised and in any future periods affected. Information about critical judgments in applying accounting policies and estimates that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognized in these consolidated financial statements is included in the following notes:

Estimates:

i.  Impairment

Assets, including property, plant and equipment, and exploration and evaluation assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts exceed their recoverable amounts. If an impairment assessment is required, the assessment of fair value often requires estimates and assumptions such as discount rates, exchange rates, commodity prices, rehabilitation and restoration costs, future capital requirements and future operating performance. Changes in such estimates could impact recoverable values of these assets. Estimates are reviewed regularly by management.

ii. Share-based payment transactions

The Company measures the cost of equity-settled transactions with employees by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments at the date at which they are granted. Estimating fair value for share-based payment transactions requires determining the most appropriate valuation model, which is dependent on the terms and conditions of the grant. This estimate also requires determining the most appropriate inputs to the valuation model including the expected life of the stock option, volatility and dividend yield and making assumptions about them. The assumptions and models used for estimating fair value for share-based payment transactions are disclosed in Note 15.

For warrant-based derivative financial instruments, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate fair value of the derivative instruments. The assumptions and models used for estimating fair value of warrant-based derivative financial instruments are disclosed in Note 14.

Judgments:

i. Provisions and contingencies

The amount recognized as provision, including legal, contractual, constructive and other exposures or obligations, is the best estimate of the consideration required to settle the related liability, including any related interest charges, taking into account the risks and uncertainties surrounding the obligation. In addition, contingencies will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. Therefore assessment of contingencies inherently involves the exercise of significant judgment and estimates of the outcome of future events. The Company assesses its liabilities and contingencies based upon the best information available, relevant tax laws and other appropriate requirements. As at December 31, 2021 and 2021, the Company does not have any material asset retirement obligations related to its exploration and evaluation assets.

ii. Title to mineral property interests

Although the Company has taken steps to verify title to mineral properties in which it has an interest, these procedures do not guarantee the Company's title. Such properties may be subject to prior agreements or transfers and title may be affected by undetected defects, government renegotiation, other legal claims, and non-compliance with regulatory, social and environmental requirements.

F-12


Loncor Gold Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

(Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share amounts)

iii. Exploration and evaluation expenditure

The application of the Company's accounting policy for exploration and evaluation expenditure requires significant judgment in determining whether it is likely that future economic benefits will flow to the Company, which may be based on assumptions about future events or circumstances. Estimates and assumptions made may change if new information becomes available. There are key circumstances that would indicate a test for impairment is required, which include: the expiry of the right to explore, substantive expenditure on further exploration is not planned, exploration for and evaluation of the mineral resources in the area have not led to discovery of commercially viable quantities, and/or sufficient data exists to show that the carrying amount of the asset is unlikely to be recovered in full from successful development or by sale. If information becomes available suggesting impairment, the amount capitalized is written off in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss during the year the new information becomes available.

Significant judgements have been made with regards to the potential for indicators of impairment. This includes judgements related to the ability to carry out the desired exploration activities as a result of various permits currently being under force majeure due to the poor security situation at the North Kivu property and the need to allocate resources amongst different projects based on the availability of capital and funding.

iv. Functional and presentation currency

Judgment is required to determine the functional currency of the Company and its subsidiaries. These judgments are continuously evaluated and are based on management's experience and knowledge of the relevant facts and circumstances.

c) Foreign Currency Translation

i. Functional and presentation currency

These consolidated financial statements are presented in United States dollars ("$"), which is the Company's functional and presentation currency. The United States dollar was determined to be the functional currency of the Company's Congo subsidiaries. References to Cdn$ represent Canadian dollars.

ii. Foreign currency transactions

The functional currency for each of the Company's subsidiaries and any associates is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates. Transactions entered into by the Company's subsidiaries and any associates in a currency other than the currency of the primary economic environment in which they operate (their "functional currency") are recorded at the rates ruling when the transactions occur except depreciation and amortization which are translated at the rates of exchange applicable to the related assets, with any gains or losses recognized in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss. Foreign currency monetary assets and liabilities are translated at current rates of exchange with the resulting gain or losses recognized in the statements of loss and comprehensive loss. Non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated using the historical exchange rates. Non-monetary assets and liabilities measured at fair value in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rates at the date when the fair value is determined.

d) Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents includes cash on hand, deposits held on call with financial institutions, and other short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less that are readily convertible to known amounts.

F-13


Loncor Gold Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

(Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share amounts)

 

e) Financial assets and liabilities

Financial assets

Initial recognition and measurement

Non-derivative financial assets within the scope of IFRS 9 are classified and measured as "financial assets at fair value", as either FVPL or FVOCI, and "financial assets at amortized cost", as appropriate. The Company determines the classification of financial assets at the time of initial recognition based on the Company's business model and the contractual terms of the cash flows.

All financial assets are recognized initially at fair value plus, in the case of financial assets not at FVPL, directly attributable transaction costs on the trade date at which the Company becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.

Financial assets with embedded derivatives are considered in their entirety when determining their classification at FVPL or at amortized cost. The Company has classified advance receivable held for collection of contractual cash flows as financial assets measured at amortized cost.

Subsequent measurement - financial assets at amortized cost

After initial recognition, financial assets measured at amortized cost are subsequently measured at the end of each reporting period at amortized cost using the Effective Interest Rate ("EIR") method. Amortized cost is calculated by taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition and any fees or costs that are an integral part of the EIR.

Subsequent measurement - financial assets at FVPL

Financial assets measured at FVPL include financial assets management intends to sell in the short term and any derivative financial instrument that is not designated as a hedging instrument in a hedge relationship. Financial assets measured at FVPL are carried at fair value in the consolidated statements of financial position with changes in fair value recognized in other income or expense in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss.

Subsequent measurement - financial assets at FVOCI

Financial assets measured at FVOCI are non-derivative financial assets that are not held for trading and the Company has made an irrevocable election at the time of initial recognition to measure the assets at FVOCI. The Company does not measure any financial assets at FVOCI.

After initial measurement, investments measured at FVOCI are subsequently measured at fair value with unrealized gains or losses recognized in other comprehensive income or loss in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss. When the investment is sold, the cumulative gain or loss remains in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss and is not reclassified to profit or loss.

Dividends from such investments are recognized in other income in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss when the right to receive payments is established.

Derecognition

A financial asset is derecognized when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the asset expire, or the Company no longer retains substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership.

Impairment of financial assets

The Company's only financial assets subject to impairment are advances receivable, which are measured at amortized cost. The Company has elected to apply the simplified approach to impairment as permitted by IFRS 9, which requires the expected lifetime loss to be recognized at the time of initial recognition of the receivable. To measure estimated credit losses, advances receivable have been grouped based on shared credit risk characteristics, including the number of days past due. An impairment loss is reversed in subsequent periods if the amount of the expected loss decreases and the decrease can be objectively related to an event occurring after the initial impairment was recognized.

F-14


Loncor Gold Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

(Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share amounts)

 Financial liabilities

Initial recognition and measurement

Financial liabilities are measured at amortized cost, unless they are required to be measured at FVPL as is the case for held for trading or derivative instruments, or the Company has opted to measure the financial liability at FVPL. The Company's financial liabilities include accounts payable, accrued liabilities, due to related parties, employee retention allowance, lease obligations, and loans, which are each measured at amortized cost. All financial liabilities are recognized initially at fair value and in the case of long-term debt, net of directly attributable transaction costs.

Subsequent measurement - financial liabilities at amortized cost

After initial recognition, financial liabilities measured at amortized cost are subsequently measured at the end of each reporting period at amortized cost using the EIR method. Amortized cost is calculated by taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition and any fees or costs that are an integral part of the EIR.

Derecognition

A financial liability is derecognized when the obligation under the liability is discharged, cancelled or expires with any associated gain or loss recognized in other income or expense in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss.

f) Loss Per Share

Basic loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss applicable by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares issued and outstanding during the reporting period and all additional common shares for the assumed exercise of options and warrants outstanding for the reporting period, if dilutive. When the Company is incurring losses, basic and diluted loss per share are the same since including the exercise of outstanding options and share purchase warrants in the diluted loss per share calculation would be anti-dilutive.

g) Property, Plant and Equipment ("PPE")

i. Recognition and measurement

Items of PPE are measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses. Cost includes expenditures that are directly attributable to the acquisition of the asset. The cost of self-constructed assets includes the cost of materials, directed labor and any other cost directly attributable to bring the asset to the location and condition necessary to be capable of operating in the manner intended by the Company.

ii. Subsequent costs

The cost of replacing part of an item of PPE is recognized in the carrying amount of the item if it is probable that the future economic benefits embodied within the part will flow to the Company and its cost can be measured reliably. The carrying amount of the replaced part is derecognized and included in net loss. If the carrying amount of the replaced component is not known, it is estimated based on the cost of the new component less estimated depreciation. The costs of the day-to-day servicing of property, plant and equipment are recognized in the consolidated statement of loss.

F-15


Loncor Gold Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

(Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share amounts)

iii. Depreciation

Depreciation is based on the cost of an asset less its residual value. Significant components of individual assets are assessed to determine whether a component has an estimated useful life that is different from that of the remainder of that asset, in which case that component is depreciated separately. Depreciation is recognized in profit or loss over the estimated useful lives of each item or component of an item of PPE as follows:

  • Furniture and fixtures   straight line over 4 Years
  • Office and communications equipment   straight line over 4 Years
  • Vehicles   straight line over 4 Years
  • Field camps and equipment   straight line over 4 Years
  • Right-of-use asset  straight line over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the lease term
  • Leasehold improvements   straight line over the lease term
  • Buildings  straight line over 25 Years

Depreciation methods, useful lives and residual values are reviewed annually and adjusted, if appropriate. Depreciation commences when an asset is available for use. Changes in estimates are accounted for prospectively.

h) Exploration and Evaluation Assets

All direct costs related to exploration and evaluation of mineral properties, net of incidental revenues and recoveries, are capitalized under exploration and evaluation assets. Exploration and evaluation expenditures include such costs as acquisition of rights to explore; sampling, trenching and surveying costs; costs related to topography, geology, geochemistry and geophysical studies; drilling costs and costs in relation to technical feasibility and commercial viability of extracting a mineral resource.

Exploration and evaluation expenditures incurred by Barrick Gold (Congo) SARL ("Barrick") under the Farm-in arrangement (See note 9) are recorded on a cost-based approach and accounted in the same way as they would for expenditures directly incurred by the Company as described in the above paragraph. Exploration and evaluation expenditures incurred by Barrick are offset by funding received from Barrick such that no liability arises before an approved pre-feasibility study is completed.

i) Intangible Assets

Intangible assets acquired by way of an asset acquisition or business combination are recognized if the asset is separable or arises from contractual or legal rights and the fair value can be measured reliably on initial recognition.

On acquisition of a mineral property in the exploration stage, the Company estimates the fair value attributable to the exploration licenses acquired. The fair value of the exploration license is recorded as an intangible asset as at the date of acquisition. When an exploration stage property moves into development, the acquired exploration potential attributable to that property is transferred to mining interests within PP&E. Intangible assets are subject to impairment testing annually or more frequently should events or changes in circumstances indicate that they might be impaired.

j) Impairment of Non-Financial Assets

The Company's PPE, exploration and evaluation assets, and intangible assets are assessed for indication of impairment at each consolidated statement of financial position date. Exploration and evaluation assets are assessed for impairment when facts and circumstances suggest that the carrying amount of an exploration and evaluation asset may exceed its recoverable amount. When facts and circumstances suggest that the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount, an entity shall measure, present and disclose any resulting impairment in accordance with IAS 36 Impairment of Assets. Internal factors, such as budgets and forecasts, as well as external factors, such as expected future prices, costs and other market factors are also monitored to determine if indications of impairment exist. If any indication of impairment exists, an estimate of the asset's recoverable amount is calculated. The recoverable amount is determined as the higher of the fair value less costs to sell for the asset and the asset's value in use. This is determined for an individual asset, unless the asset does not generate cash inflows that are largely independent of those from other assets or the Company's assets. If this is the case, the individual assets are grouped together into cash generating units ("CGU") for impairment purposes. Such CGUs represent the lowest level for which there are separately identifiable cash inflows that are largely independent of the cash flows from other assets.

F-16


Loncor Gold Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

(Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share amounts)

If the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its recoverable amount, the asset is impaired and an impairment loss is charged to the statements of loss and comprehensive loss so as to reduce the carrying amount to its recoverable amount (i.e., the higher of fair value less cost to sell and value in use). Fair value less cost to sell is the amount obtainable from the sale of an asset or CGU in an arm's length transaction between knowledgeable, willing parties, less the costs of disposal. Value in use is determined as the present value of the future cash flows expected to be derived from an asset or CGU. Estimated future cash flows are calculated using estimated future prices, any mineral reserves and resources and operating and capital costs. All assumptions used are those that an independent market participant would consider appropriate. The estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset for which estimates of future cash flows have not been adjusted. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company recognized an impairment of exploration and evaluation assets for $452,250 (December 31, 2020 and 2019 - $nil) to adjust the carrying value of the assets to their fair value, using a level 3 value in use methodology.

k) Income Taxes

Income tax expense consists of current and deferred tax expense. Income tax expense is recognized in the statement of loss and comprehensive loss, except to the extent that it relates to items recognized in other comprehensive income or directly in equity. In this case, the tax is also recognized in other comprehensive income or directly in equity.

Current income tax assets and liabilities for the current and prior periods are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to the taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute current income tax assets and liabilities are measured at future anticipated tax rates, which have been enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date. Current tax assets and current tax liabilities are only offset if a legally enforceable right exists to set off the amounts, and the Company intends to settle on a net basis, or to realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.

Deferred taxation is provided on all qualifying temporary differences at the reporting date between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes. Deferred tax assets are only recognized to the extent that it is probable that the deductible temporary differences will reverse in the foreseeable future and future taxable profit will be available against which the temporary difference can be utilized.

Deferred tax liabilities and assets are not recognized for temporary differences between the carrying amount and tax bases of investments in controlled entities where the parent entity is able to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences and it is probable that the differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets and liabilities and when the deferred tax balances relate to the same taxation authority.

l) Share-Based Payments

Equity-settled share-based payments for directors, officers and employees are measured at fair value at the date of grant and recorded as compensation expense in the consolidated financial statements. The fair value determined at the grant date of the equity-settled share-based payments is expensed over the vesting period based on the Company's estimate of options that will eventually vest. The number of forfeitures likely to occur is estimated on grant date and is revised as deemed necessary.

F-17


Loncor Gold Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

(Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share amounts)

Compensation expense on stock options granted to consultants is measured at the earlier of the completion of performance and the date the options are vested using the fair value method and is recorded as an expense in the same period as if the Company had paid cash for the goods or services received.

When the value of goods or services received in exchange for the share-based payment cannot be reliably estimated, the fair value is measured by use of a Black-Scholes valuation model. The expected life used in the model is adjusted, based on management's best estimate, for the effects of non-transferability, exercise restrictions, and behavioural considerations.

Any consideration paid by directors, officers, employees and consultants on exercise of equity-settled share-based payments is credited to share capital. Shares are issued from treasury upon the exercise of equity-settled share-based instruments.

m) Provisions and Contingencies

Provisions are recognized when a legal or constructive obligation exists, as a result of past events, and it is probable that an outflow of resources that can be reliably estimated will be required to settle the obligation. Where the effect is material, the provision is discounted using an appropriate current market-based pre-tax discount rate. The increase in the provision due to passage of time is recognized as interest expense.

When a contingency substantiated by confirming events, can be reliably measured and is likely to result in an economic outflow, a liability is recognized as the best estimate required to settle the obligation. A contingent liability is disclosed where the existence of an obligation will only be confirmed by future events, or where the amount of a present obligation cannot be measured reliably or will likely not result in an economic outflow. Contingent assets are only disclosed when the inflow of economic benefits is probable. When the economic benefit becomes virtually certain, the asset is no longer contingent and is recognized in the consolidated financial statements.

n) Related Party Transactions

Parties are considered to be related if one party has the ability, directly or indirectly, to control the other party or exercise significant influence over the other party in making financial and operating decisions. Parties are also considered to be related if they are subject to common control or common significant influence. Related parties may be individuals or corporate entities. A transaction is considered to be a related party transaction when there is a transfer of resources or obligations between related parties. Related party transactions are in the normal course of business and have commercial substance.

o) Decommisioning obligations

The Company recognizes an estimate of the liabilities associated with decommissioning obligations when it has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events, it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation, and a reliable estimate of the obligation can be made. The estimated fair value of the decommissioning obligations is recorded as a long-term liability, with a corresponding increase in the carrying amount of the related asset. The capitalized amount is amortized over the estimated life of the asset. The liability amount is increased each reporting period due to the passage of time and the amount of accretion is charged to any earnings in the period. The decommissioning obligations are charged against the decommissioning obligations to the extent of the liability recorded. The Company has no material decommissioning obligations as at December 31, 2021 and 2020.

F-18


Loncor Gold Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

(Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share amounts)

 

p) Business Combination

On the acquisition of a business, the Company uses the acquisition method of accounting, whereby the purchase consideration is allocated to the identifiable assets and liabilities on the basis of fair value at the date of acquisition. Incremental costs related to acquisitions are expensed as incurred. When the cost of the acquisition exceeds the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired, the difference is recorded as goodwill. If the fair value attributable to the Company's share of the identifiable net assets exceeds the cost of acquisition, the difference is recognized as a gain in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss.

q) Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company reviews the terms of its equity instruments and other financing arrangements to determine whether or not there are embedded derivative instruments that are required to be accounted for separately as a derivative financial instrument. The deriviative financial instrument is presumed to be classified as a derivative financial liability unless it meets all the criteria to recognize as equity instrument under IAS 32, Financial Instruments: Presentation. One of the criteria is that the conversion option exchanges a fixed amount of shares for a fixed amount of cash ("fixed for fixed"). For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported as charges or credits to profit or loss. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate fair value of the derivative instruments. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether or not such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is reassessed at the end of each reporting period. If reclassification is required, the fair value of the derivative instrument, as of the determination date, is reclassified. Any previous charges or credits to income for changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument are not reversed.

r) Employee retention allowance

The Company previously had an incentive employee retention policy under which an amount equal to one month salary per year of service was accrued to each qualified employee up to a maximum of 10 months (or 10 years of service with the Company and/or a related company). To qualify for this retention allowance, an employee was required to complete two years of service with the Company and/or a related company. The full amount of retention allowance accumulated by a particular employee is paid out when the employee is no longer employed with the Company, unless other arrangements are made or unless there is a termination due to misconduct, in which case the retention allowance is forfeited. While the retention allowance policy was discontinued by the Company effective December 31, 2017, the retention allowance amounts accrued up to December 31, 2017 remain recorded as a liability in the Company's consolidated statement of financial position. There is uncertainty about the timing and amount of these potential retention allowance payments.

s) Right-of-use assets and lease obligation

Right-of-use assets are measured at cost, less any accumulated depreciation and impairment losses, and adjusted for any remeasurement of lease liabilities. The cost of right-of-use assets includes the initial amount of lease liabilities recognized, initial direct costs incurred, and lease payments made at or before the commencement date less any lease incentives received.

Unless the Company is reasonably certain to obtain ownership of the leased asset at the end of the lease term, the right-of-use assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the estimated useful life and the lease term. Right-of-use assets are subject to impairment.

At the commencement date of the lease, the Company recognizes a lease liability measured at the present value of lease payments to be made over the lease term, discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease or, if that rate cannot be readily determined, the Company's incremental borrowing rate.

F-19


Loncor Gold Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

(Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share amounts)

After the commencement date, the amount of the lease liability is increased to reflect the accretion of interest and reduced for the lease payments made. In addition, the carrying amount of the lease liability is remeasured if there is a modification, a change in the lease term, a change in the fixed lease payments or a change in the assessment to purchase the underlying asset.

The Company presents right-of-use assets in the property, plant and equipment line item on the consolidated statements of financial position and the lease liability in the lease obligation line item on the consolidated statements of financial position.

Short-term leases and leases of low value assets

The Company does not recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for leases that have a lease term of 12 months or less and do not contain a purchase option or for leases related to low value assets. Lease payments on short-term leases and leases of low value assets are recognized as an expense in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss.

Sub-leases

The Company recognizes payments received from the sub-lease arrangements as lease income while retaining the right-of-use assets and the lease liability in its consolidated statements of financial position.

t) Government Grants

Government loan programs often include conditions that borrowers must meet throughout the term of the loan. Borrowers should recognize a government grant when there is reasonable assurance that they will meet the conditions attached to it and will receive the funds.

A borrower may receive a loan from the government that, if certain conditions are met, all or a portion of the loan will be forgiven. If there is reasonable assurance that the borrower will meet the terms for the forgiveness of the loan, the loan is treated as a government grant in accordance with IAS 20. Otherwise, the loan should be accounted for in accordance with IFRS 9.

In other programs, a borrower may receive a below-market interest rate loan from the government. A below-market interest loan is initially recognized at its fair value plus or minus any transaction costs inaccordance with IFRS 9. The interest rate differential, measured as the difference between the initial carrying value of the loan and the proceeds received, is treated as a government grant and accounted for in accordance with IAS 20.

u) New Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted

IAS 1 - Presentation of Financial Statements

On January 23, 2020, the IASB issued an amendment to IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements providing a more general approach to the classification of liabilities. The amendment clarifies that the classification of liabilities as current or noncurrent depends on the rights existing at the end of the reporting period as opposed to the expectations of exercising the right for settlement of the liability. The amendments further clarify that settlement refers to the transfer of cash, equity instruments, other assets, or services to the counterparty. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2023 and are to be applied retrospectively, with early adoption permitted. The Company is assessing the financial impact of the amendment on its consolidated financial statements.

F-20


Loncor Gold Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

(Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share amounts)

IAS 16 - Property, Plant and Equipment

On May 14, 2020, the IASB issued an amendment to IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment to prohibit deducting from the cost of an item of property, plant and equipment, any proceeds from selling items produced while bringing the asset to the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management. The proceeds from selling such items, and the cost of producing those items are to be recognized in profit and loss. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2022 with early adoption permitted. The amendment is to be applied retrospectively only to items of property, plant and equipment that are brought to the location and condition necessary for them to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management on or after the earliest period presented in the financial statements in the year in which the amendments are first applied. The Company is assessing the financial impact of the amendment on its consolidated financial statements.

IAS 37 - Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets

On May 14, 2020, the IASB issued an amendment to IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets to specify which costs an entity includes in determining the cost of fulfilling a contract for the purpose of assessing whether the contract is onerous. The amendment specifies that the cost of fulfilling a contract comprises the costs that relate directly to the contract. Costs that relate directly to the contract can either be incremental costs of fulfilling the contract or an allocation of other costs that relate directly to fulfilling contracts. The amendments are effective for contracts for which the Company has not yet fulfilled all its obligations on or after January 1, 2022 with early adoption permitted. The Company is assessing the financial impact of the amendment on its consolidated financial statements.

IFRS 9 - Financial Instruments

On May 14, 2020, the IASB issued an amendment to IFRS 9 Financial Instruments clarifying which fees to include in the test in assessing whether to derecognize a financial liability. Only those fees paid or received between the borrower and the lender, including fees paid or received by either the entity or the lender on the other's behalf are included. The amendment is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2022 with early adoption permitted. The Company is assessing the financial impact of the amendment on its consolidated financial statements.

4. Acquisitions

Loncor Kilo Inc.

On September 27, 2019, the Company closed certain transactions provided for by an agreement (the "Agreement") entered into by the Company with Resolute (Treasury) Pty Ltd ("Resolute"), Kilo Goldmines Ltd. ("KGL") and Kilo Goldmines Inc. ("Kilo Inc.", and together with KGL, "Kilo"), and which resulted in the Company acquiring Kilo Inc. Pursuant to the Agreement, (a) Resolute assigned to the Company, for nominal consideration, all of Resolute's rights under a secured cash advance facility (the "Facility") which Resolute had made available to Kilo (including Resolute's rights under the security provided by Kilo in respect of the Facility (the "Security")), (b) Kilo consented to the said assignment of the Facility (including the Security) from Resolute to the Company, and (c) following implementation of the said assignment, the Company exercised its rights under the Security (the "Security Enforcement") as a secured creditor to realize on all of the outstanding shares of Kilo Inc., in full satisfaction of all amounts owing under the Facility (prior to the Security Enforcement, Kilo Inc. was a wholly-owned subsidiary of KGL). In the Agreement, Kilo agreed to cooperate with and assist the Company in the Security Enforcement and for such cooperation and assistance, the Company paid $98,124 (Cdn$130,000) to KGL.

Upon the Company completing the Security Enforcement, Kilo Inc. became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, such that the Company now holds, through Kilo Inc., Kilo Inc.'s mineral projects in the Congo (these mineral projects then consisted of a 71.25% interest in the Adumbi properties (the Company now holds a 84.68% interest in the Adumbi properties) and a 49% interest in the Isiro properties (the Company now holds a 100% interest in the Isiro properties), which are all located in the Ngayu gold belt in northeastern Congo near Loncor's existing Ngayu properties). See Notes 9(e) and 9(f).

F-21


Loncor Gold Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

(Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share amounts)

The acquisition of Kilo Inc. has been recorded as a business combination under IFRS 3 Business Combinations.The total consideration has been allocated to the fair value of assets and liabilities acquired as follows:

Total consideration:      
       
Cash consideration $ 98,124  
       
Purchase Price $ 98,124  
       
Fair value of assets and liabilities:      
       
Cash and cash equivalent $ 599  
       
Property, Plant and Equipment $ 223,346  
       
Exploration and Evaluation Assets $ 175,446  
       
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $ (301,267 )
       
Fair value of net assets acquired $ 98,124  

In March 2020, the Company acquired an additional 5.04% interest in Adumbi pursuant to a private transaction with one of the former minority shareholders of Adumbi for total consideration of $140,000. This acquisition increased the Company's interest in Adumbi from 71.25% to 76.29%. In September 2020, Adumbi was restructured as per the requirements of the OHADA (Organization for the Harmonization of Business Law in Africa) Uniform Act relating to commercial companies. The restructuring resulted in the Company increasing its interest in Adumbi Mining to 84.68%, minority shareholders holding 5.32% and the Congo 10%. The Congo was allocated 10% in accordance with the requirements of the new Congo Mining Code enacted in 2018. Also as a result of the restructuring, Adumbi Mining now operates as "Adumbi Mining S.A." rather than Adumbi Mining SARL.

Devon and Navarro

In June 2018, the Company completed the acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding shares of Devon Resources SARL (Devon), a corporation incorporated under the laws of the Congo, for total consideration comprising:

a) The issuance by the Company of 500,000 common shares of the Company valued at Cdn$100,000

b) The payment of $75,000 in cash

c) The payment of $190,000 in satisfaction of an outstanding loan provided by Devon to the Company.

Also, in June 2018, the Company completed the acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding shares of Navarro Resources SARL (Navarro), a corporation incorporated under the laws of the Congo, for a total purchase price of $300,000, paid for by the settlement of a $300,000 loan provided by the Company to Navarro (see note 9).

Both acquisitions have been treated as a purchase of assets for accounting purposes as the requirements for business combinations under IFRS 3 Business Combination had not been met.

F-22


Loncor Gold Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

(Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share amounts)

5. Subsidiaries

 The following table lists the Company's direct and indirect subsidiaries:

Name of Subsidiary Place of
Incorporation
Proportion of
Ownership Interest
Direct/Indirect Principal
Activity
Loncor Resources Congo SARL Democratic Republic of the Congo 100% Direct Mineral Exploration
Devon Resources SARL Democratic Republic of the Congo 100% Indirect Mineral Exploration
Navarro Resources SARL Democratic Republic of the Congo 100% Indirect Mineral Exploration
Loncor Kilo Inc. Ontario, Canada 100% Direct Mineral Exploration
Adumbi Mining S.A. Democratic Republic of the Congo 84.68% Indirect Mineral Exploration
KGL Isiro Atlantic Ltd British Virgin Islands 100% Indirect Mineral Exploration
Isiro (Jersey) Limited Jersey 100% Indirect Mineral Exploration
KGL Isiro SARL Democratic Republic of the Congo 100% Indirect Mineral Exploration

6. Advances receivable and prepaid expenses

    December 31,
2021
    December 31,
2020
 
Supplier prepayments and deposits   206,858     90,928  
Loan to KGL and accrued interest   60,543     56,199  
Other receivables and employee advances   19,037     22,997  
Harmonized Sales Tax receivable   58,755     66,543  
  $ 345,193   $ 236,667  

In connection with the Kilo Agreement (Note 4), the Company provided to Kilo Goldmines Ltd. an unsecured loan in the principal amount of $51,272 (Cdn$65,000) bearing interest of 8% per annum and repayable on demand. For the year ended December 31, 2021, the interest accrued on the loan was $9,271 (December 31, 2020 - $5,147).

Other receivables and employee advances of $19,037, are non-interest bearing, unsecured and due on demand (December 31, 2020 - $22,997).

For the year ended December 31, 2021 the Company received $111,535 (2020 and 2019 - $nil) of Harmanized Sales Tax refunds from prior years' reassessments. This is included in interest and other income in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss.

 

7. Related party transactions

Balances and transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries, which are related parties of the Company, have been eliminated on consolidation, and are not disclosed in this note.

F-23


Loncor Gold Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

(Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share amounts)

a) Key Management Remuneration

Key management includes directors (executive and non-executive), the Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"), the Chief Financial Officer, and the senior executives reporting directly to the CEO. The remuneration of the key management of the Company as defined above, during the years ended December 31, 2021, December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 was as follows:

    For the year ended  
    December 31, 2021     December 31, 2020     December 31, 2019  
Salaries and bonus $ 938,542   $ 542,558   $ 376,386  
Compensation expense-share-based payments $ 724,035   $ 188,601   $ 122,999  
  $ 1,662,577   $ 731,159   $ 499,385  

b) Other Related Party Transactions

As at December 31, 2021, an amount of $67,477 relating to advances provided to the Company was due to Arnold Kondrat ("Mr. Kondrat"), the Executive Chairman and a director of the Company (December 31, 2020 - $279,154 related to salary and advances to the Company). Total amount paid to Mr. Kondrat for the year ended December 31, 2021 was $500,000 (2020 and 2019 - $242,497 and $90,444, respectively).

As at December 31, 2021, an amount of $216,148 was due from Gentor Resources Inc. (a company with common directors) related to common expenses (December 31, 2020 - $26,474 ).

As at December 31, 2021, an amount of $68,926 was due from KGL Resources Ltd. (a company with a common officer) related to common expenses (December 31, 2020 - $5,766 was due to KGL resources Ltd.).

The amounts included in due to or from related party are unsecured, non-interest bearing and are payable on demand.

8. Property, Plant and Equipment

The Company's property, plant and equipment are summarized as follows:

    Furniture &
fixtures
    Office &
Communication
equipment
    Vehicles     Land and
Building
    Field camps
and
equipment
    Right-of-use
asset
    Leasehold
improvements
    Total  
    $     $     $     $     $     $     $     $  
Cost                                                
Balance at January 1, 2020
  151,786     28,190     11,708     217,617     221,375     739,106     84,906     1,454,688  
Additions
  -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -  
Disposals
  -     -     -     -     -     (51,149 )   -     (51,149 )
Balance at December 31, 2020   151,786     28,190     11,708     217,617     221,375     687,957     84,906     1,403,539  
Additions
  -     1,232     -     125,911     815,967     -     -     943,110  
Disposals
  -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -  
Revaluation of asset
  -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -  
Balance at December 31, 2021   151,786     29,422     11,708     343,528     1,037,342     687,957     84,906     2,346,649  
                                                 
Accumulated Depreciation                                                
Balance at January 1, 2020
  141,866     22,605     11,708     2,985     216,636     192,810     84,906     673,516  
Additions
  1,839     2,528     -     11,938     3,964     181,850     -     202,119  
Disposals
  -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -  
Balance at December 31, 2020   143,705     25,133     11,708     14,923     220,600     374,660     84,906     875,635  
Additions
  1,501     3,529     -     11,938     15,663     170,889     -     203,520  
Disposals
  -     -     -     -     -     -     -     -  
Adjustment
  -     (1,940 )   -     -     -     -     -     (1,940 )
Balance at December 31, 2021   145,206     26,722     11,708     26,861     236,263     545,549     84,906     1,077,215  
Balance at January 1, 2020
  9,920     5,585     -     214,632     4,739     546,296     -     781,172  
Balance at December 31, 2020
  8,081     2,414     2,414     2,414     2,414     2,414     2,414     527,904  
Balance at December 31, 2021
  6,580     2,700     -     316,667     801,079     142,408     -     1,269,434  

 

F-24


Loncor Gold Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

(Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share amounts)

During the year ended December 31, 2021, depreciation in the amount of $28,445 (year ended December 31, 2020 - $16,771, year ended December 31, 2019 - $4,878) was capitalized to exploration and evaluation assets.

9. Exploration and Evaluation Assets

    North Kivu     Ngayu     Imbo     Total  
Cost                        
Balance as at January 1, 2020 $ 10,440,729   $ 17,454,831   $ 254,283   $ 28,149,843  
Additions
  180,637     4,279,656     2,760,307     7,220,600  
Adjustment
  -     -     (81,685 )   (81,685 )
Earn-in Barrick payment (*)
  -     (4,267,816 )   -     (4,267,816 )
                         
Balance as at December 31, 2020 $ 10,621,366   $ 17,466,671   $ 2,932,905   $ 31,020,942  
                         
Additions
  -     2,216,038     6,859,907     9,075,945  
Earn-in Barrick payment (*)
  -     (1,975,162 )   -     (1,975,162 )
Balance as at December 31, 2021 $ 10,621,366   $ 17,707,547   $ 9,792,812   $ 38,121,725  

There is $150,000 of intangible exploration and evaluation expenditures as at December 31, 2021 (December 31, 2020 - $602,250).These Intangible exploration and evaluation assets are in relation to mineral rights acquired with respect to the Ngayu properties ($150,000). The Devon ($152,250) and Navarro ($300,000) properties were fully impaired as at December 31, 2021 as the Company does not intend to utilize the exploration permits. The intangibles have not been included in the table above.

The Company's exploration and evaluation assets are subject to renewal of the underlying permits and rights and government royalties.

a. North Kivu

The North Kivu project is situated in the North Kivu Province in eastern Congo to the northwest of Lake Edward and consists of various exploration permits. All of these exploration permits are currently under force majeure due to the poor security situation, affecting the Company's ability to carry out the desired exploration activities. The duration of the event of force majeure is added to the time limit for execution of obligations under the permits. Exploration estimates to date have not advanced to the stage of being able to identify the quantity of possible resources available for potential mining. Under force majeure, the Company has no tax payment obligations and does not lose tenure of mining titles until force majeure is lifted.

b. Ngayu

The Ngayu project consists of various exploration permits and is found within the Tshopo Province in the northeast of the Congo, approximately 270 kilometers northeast of Kisangani. The Ngayu project covers part of the Ngayu Archaean greenstone belt which is one of a number of greenstone belts in the north-east Congo Archaeancraton that includes the Kilo and Moto greenstone belts. These Archaean greenstone belts are the northwestern extensions of the Lake Victoria greenstone belt terrain that hosts a number of world class gold deposits including Geita and Bulyanhulu.

In 2015, due to a decrease in gold prices coupled with the reduction of the exploration budget, the Company conducted an impairment analysis whereby the carrying value of the Ngayu exploration and evaluation asset as at December 31, 2015 was assessed for possible impairment. The asset's recoverable amount was calculated applying a fair value of $15 per ounce of gold in the ground, which was provided by a valuation analysis of an independent report on similar African exploration companies, to the Ngayu project's Makapela estimated mineral resource. Since the carrying value of the asset was determined to be higher than its recoverable amount, an impairment loss of $2,300,000 was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2015. As at December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company conducted an analysis of various factors and determined that there was no further impairment recognized by IFRS 6, and no evidence to support an impairment reversal. As at December 31, 2021, the Company determined that no impairment charge or gain was required.


F-25


Loncor Gold Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

(Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share amounts)

c. Devon

The Devon properties consisted of three (3) exploration permits situated in the province of Haut-Uele in north eastern Congo. The Company has decided not to renew these exploration permits upon expiry in September 2023.

d. Navarro

The Navarro properties consisted of six (6) exploration permits situated in the provinces of Ituri and Haut-Uele in north eastern Congo, which the Company has decided not to renew upon expiry in April 2023.

e. Adumbi

The Adumbi (previously KGL-Somituri, See Note 4) properties consist of six (6) mining licenses valid until 2039 and which cover an area of 361 square kilometers within the Archaean Ngayu Greenstone Belt in the Ituri and Haut Uele provinces in north eastern Congo. The Company's interest in the Adumbi properties was acquired in September 2019 through the agreement with Resolute, KGL and Kilo Inc. (see Note 4). The six mining licenses (Exploitation permits)

are registered in the name of Adumbi, a company incorporated under the laws of the Congo in which the Company holds a 84.68% interest and the minority partners hold 15.32% (including 10% free carried interest owned by the government of the Congo). See Note 4.

Under an agreement signed in April 2010 with the minority partners of Adumbi, the Company's subsidiary Loncor Kilo Inc. agreed to finance all activities of Adumbi, until the filing of a bankable feasibility study, by way of loans which bear interest at the rate of 5% per annum. Within thirty days of the receipt of a bankable feasibility study, the minority partners may collectively elect to exchange their equity participation for either a 2% net smelter royalty, or a 1% net smelter royalty plus an amount equal to 2 Euros per ounce of proven mineral reserves.

f. Isiro

The Isiro properties consist of eleven (11) exploration permits registered in the name of KGL-Isiro SARL and covering an area of 1,884 square kilometers in the province of Haut Uele, in north eastern Congo. The Company owns through Loncor Kilo Inc. 100% of the common shares of Kilo Isiro Atlantic Ltd. Kilo Isiro Atlantic Ltd owns 100% of the shares of Isiro (Jersey) Limited, which in turn owns 100% of the shares in KGL-Isiro SARL (a company registered in the Congo).

The KGL Isiro SARL permits were put under force majeure with effect from February 14, 2014 pending resolution of a court action involving these properties and their expiry is extended by the period of force majeure.

10. Intangible Assets

The Company's intangible assets included certain licenses and rights. Based on management's assessment, these intangible assets have been valued at $nil (2020 - $1). During the year ended December 31, 2021 an impairment charge of $1 was recorded against these intangible assets.

11. Segmented Reporting

The Company has one operating segment: the acquisition, exploration and development of precious metal projects located in the Congo. The operations of the Company are located in two geographic locations, Canada and the Congo. Geographic segmentation of non-current assets is as follows:


F-26


Loncor Gold Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

(Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share amounts)

December 31, 2021              
    Property, plant and
equipment
    Intangible assets     Exploration
and evaluation
 
Congo $ 1,118,622     -   $ 38,271,725  
Canada $ 150,812     -     -  
  $ 1,269,434     -   $ 38,271,725  
December 31, 2020              
    Property, plant and
equipment
    Intangible assets     Exploration
and evaluation
 
Congo $ 205,189     -   $ 31,623,192  
Canada $ 322,715   $ 1     -  
  $ 527,904   $ 1   $ 31,623,192  

12. Accounts Payable

The following table summarizes the Company's accounts payable:

    December 31, 2021     December 31, 2020  
Exploration and evaluation expenditures $ 1,005,260   $ 417,566  
Non-exploration and evaluation expenditures $ 483,119   $ 297,886  
             
Total Accounts Payable $ 1,488,379   $ 715,452  

13. Loans

a)    In June 2018, as part of the closing of the acquisition of Devon, the Company issued an unsecured non-interest bearing note in the amount $265,000, payable on demand, in satisfaction of the non-share component of the consideration for the Devon acquisition. As at December 31, 2021, the balance of $nil was outstanding (December 31, 2020 - $11,650).

b)   In May 2020, the Company received a $29,352 (Cdn$40,000) line of credit ("CEBA LOC") with Toronto-Dominion Bank under the Canada Emergency Business Account ("CEBA") program funded by the Government of Canada. The CEBA LOC is non-interest bearing, can be repaid at any time without penalty.

On January 1, 2021, the outstanding balance of the CEBA LOC automatically converted to a 2-year interest free term loan ("CEBA Term Loan"). The CEBA Term Loan may be repaid at any time without notice or the payment of any penalty. If 75% of the CEBA Term Loan is repaid on or before December 31, 2022, the repayment of the remining 25% of such CEBA Term Loan shall be forgiven. If on December 31, 2022, the Compny exercises the option for a 3-year extension, 5% interest during the term extension period will aply on any balance remaining.

The Company recorded the CEBA LOC upon initial recognition at its fair value of $24,146 (Cdn$32,906) using an effective interest rate of 3.45%. The difference of $5,206 (Cdn$7,094) between the fair value and the total amount of CEBA LOC received has been recorded as a fair value gain on loans advanced in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss. During the year ended December 31, 2021, interest of $985 (Cdn$1,252) has been accreted on the CEBA LOC and is included within "interest and bank expenses" in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss (years ended December 31, 2020: $623 and 2019 - $Nil).

As at December 31, 2021, the CEBA LOC is valued at $27,602 (Cdn$34,992) (December 31, 2020 - $26,501 (Cdn$33,741)).

F-27


Loncor Gold Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

(Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share amounts)

14. Share Capital

a) Authorized

The authorized share capital of the Company consists of unlimited number of common shares and unlimited number of preference shares, issuable in series, with no par value. All shares issued are fully paid.

The holders of common shares are entitled to receive notice of and to attend all meetings of the shareholders of the Company and shall have one vote for each common share held at all meetings of shareholders of the Company, except for meetings at which only holders of another specified class or series of shares are entitled to vote separately as a class or series. Subject to the prior rights of the holders of the preference shares or any other share ranking senior to the common shares, the holders of the common shares are entitled to (a) receive any dividend as and when declared by the board of directors, out of the assets of the Company properly applicable to payment of dividends, in such amount and in such form as the board of directors may from time to time determine, and (b) receive the remaining property of the Company in the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company.

The Company may issue preference shares at any time and from time to time in one or more series with designations, rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions fixed by the board of directors. The preference shares of each series are ranked on parity with the preference shares of every series and are entitled to priority over the common shares and any other shares of the Company ranking junior to the preference shares, with respect to priority in payment of dividends and the return of capital and the distribution of assets of the Company in the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company.

b) Issued share capital

The following table summarizes the Company issued common shares:

    Number of share     Amount  
Balance - December 31, 2018   93,694,956     79,376,206  
             
September 17, 2019   54,326     15,993  
October 31, 2019   1,000,000     304,120  
December 9, 2019   31,697     8,967  
December 27, 2019   500,000     136,000  
             
Balance - December 31, 2019   95,280,979     79,841,286  
             
February 3, 2020   500,000     135,594  
February 6, 2020   22,659     8,502  
February 25, 2020   6,000,000     1,807,200  
cost of issuance         (80,842 )
February 27, 2020   375,000     100,535  
June 30, 2020   24,896     8,292  
July 31, 2020   8,000,000     2,984,000  
August 27, 2020   2,000,000     761,700  
cost of issuance         (427,145 )
September 9, 2020   20,640     8,578  
             
Balance - December 31, 2020   112,224,174     85,147,700  
             
February 2, 2021   1,930,000     647,737  
February 3, 2021   6,070,000     2,041,881  
February 12, 2021   3,500,000     1,128,914  
March 8, 2021   1,050,000     173,012  
June 21, 2021   600,000     431,472  
July 19, 2021   1,401,426     702,910  
July 22, 2021   125,000     63,656  
July 23, 2021   6,323,574     3,253,444  
October 4, 2021   75,000     51,827  
December 1, 2021   1,500,000     1,044,905  
December 21, 2021   300,000     215,834  
cost of issuance         (422,780 )
             
Balance - December 31, 2021   135,099,174     94,480,512  

 

F-28


Loncor Gold Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

(Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share amounts)

In September 2019, the Company issued 54,326 common shares at a price of Cdn$0.39 per share as the consideration for certain consulting services rendered by a third party.

Also in September 2019, all of the Company's common shares issued and outstanding were consolidated on the basis of one common share of the Company for every 2 (two) existing common shares. All of the share, stock option and warrant amounts in these consolidated financial statements have been adjusted to reflect the said share consolidation.

In October and in December 2019, the Company issued 1,000,000 common shares at a price of Cdn$0.40 per share and 31,697 common shares at a price of Cdn$0.375 per share, respectively, as the consideration for certain consulting services rendered by third parties. Also in December 2019, warrants to purchase 500,000 common shares of the Company were exercised at a price of Cdn$0.36 per share for gross proceeds of $136,000 (Cdn$180,000).

In February 2020, the Company closed a private placement of 6,000,000 common shares of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.40 per share for gross proceeds of $1,807,200 (Cdn$2,400,000). In connection with this private placement, the Company incurred $80,842 of issuance costs settled in cash. A total of 1,790,000 of the common shares were purchased by certain insiders of the Company, including Mr. Kondrat, who purchased 1,440,000 of the common shares. The Company also issued in February 2020, 22,659 common shares at a price of Cdn$0.50 per share as the consideration for certain consulting services rendered by a third party and warrants to purchase 875,000 common shares of the Company were exercised at a price of Cdn$0.36 per share for gross proceeds of $236,129 (Cdn$315,000).

In June 2020, the Company issued 24,896 common shares at a price of Cdn$0.4539 per share, as the consideration for consulting services rendered by a third party.

In July and August 2020, the Company closed, in two tranches, a private placement financing for a total of 10,000,000 common shares of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.50 per share for total gross proceeds of $3,745,700 (Cdn$5,000,000). A total of 3,390,000 of the said shares were purchased by certain insiders of the Company. In connection with this private placement, the Company incurred $427,145 issuance costs settled in cash and warrants.

In September 2020, the Company issued 20,640 common shares at a price of Cdn$0.5475 per share, as the consideration for consulting services rendered by a third party.

In February 2021, the Company completed, in two tranches, a private placement of a total of 11,500,000 units of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.50 per unit for gross proceeds of $4,504,188 (Cdn$5,750,000). Each such unit consists of one common share of the Company and one-half of one common share purchase warrant (each whole common share purchase warrant, an "A-Warrant") of the Company, with each A-Warrant entitling the holder thereof to acquire one common share of the Company at an exercise price of Cdn$0.75 for a period of 12 months following the closing date of the issuance of the units.

In March 2021, stock options to purchase a total of 1,050,000 common shares of the Company were exercised for gross proceeds of $99,527 (Cdn$126,000).

In June 2021, warrants to purchase 600,000 common shares of the Company were exercised for gross proceeds of $363,600 (Cdn$450,000).

In July 2021, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement of 7,850,000 units of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.70 per unit for gross proceeds of $4,358,386 (Cdn$5,495,000). Each such unit consists of one common share of the Company and one-half of one common share purchase warrant (each whole common share purchase warrant, a "B-Warrant") of the Company, with each B-Warrant entitling the holder thereof to acquire one common share of the Company at an exercise price of Cdn$0.95 for a period of 12 months following the closing date of the issuance of the units.

In October 2021, stock options to purchase 75,000 common shares of the Company, were exercised for gross proceeds of $41,722 (Cdn$52,500).

In December 2021, warrants to purchase 1,800,000 common shares of the Company were exercised for gross proceeds of $1,054,598 (Cdn$1,350,000)

F-29


Loncor Gold Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

(Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share amounts)

As of December 31, 2021, the Company had issued and outstanding 135,099,174 common shares (December 31, 2020 - 112,224,174). No preference shares are issued and outstanding. Subsequent to December 31, 2021, the Company issued 5,650,000 common shares pursuant to an additional private placement financing (see Note 22).

c) Common share purchase warrants

The following table summarizes the Company's common share purchase warrants outstanding as at December 31, 2021:

Date of Grant   Opening
Balance
    Granted
during
period
    Cancelled     Exercised     Expired     Closing
Balance
    Exercise Price
(Cdn $)
    Exercise period
(months)
    Expiry Date     Remaining
contractual life
(months)
 
2020-07-31   123,000     -     -     -     -     123,000   $ 0.61     24     2022-07-31     7  
2020-09-18   414,000     -     (96,000 )   -     -     318,000   $ 0.61     24     2022-08-26     8  
2021-02-02   -     1,050,800     -     -     -     1,050,800   $ 0.75     12     2022-02-02     1  
2021-02-03   -     3,101,000     -     (2,100,000 )   -     1,001,000   $ 0.75     12     2022-02-03     1  
2021-02-12   -     1,804,000     -     (300,000 )   -     1,504,000   $ 0.75     12     2022-02-12     1  
2021-07-19   -     720,513     -     -     -     720,513   $ 0.95     12     2022-07-19     7  
2021-07-22   -     70,000     -     -     -     70,000   $ 0.95     12     2022-07-22     7  
2021-07-23   -     3,196,928     -     -     -     3,196,928   $ 0.95     12     2022-07-23     7  
    537,000     9,943,241     (96,000 )   (2,400,000 )   -     7,984,241                          

As at December 30, 2021, the Company had 7,984,241 outstanding common share purchase warrants (December 31, 2020 - 537,000).

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company issued 9,674,999 common share purchase warrants and 268,242 finder warrants in connection with the February 2021 and July 2021 private placement financings. In June and December 2021, 2,400,000 warrants were execised at an exercise price of Cdn$0.75 per share. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company issued 537,000 finder warrants in connection with the July and August 2020 private placement financing.

96,000 warrants were cancelled during the year ended December 31, 2021 and no warrants were forfeited or cancelled for year ended December 31, 2020.

The value of the warrants was calculated using the Black-Scholes model and the assumptions at grant date and period end date were as follows:

(i) Risk-free interest rate: 0.17% - 0.39%, which is based on the Bank of Canada benchmark bonds yield 2 year rate

in effect at the time of grant for bonds with maturity dates at the estimated term of the warrants

(ii) Expected volatility: 69.23% - 92.15%, which is based on the Company's historical stock prices

(iii) Expected life: 1 - 2 year

(iv) Expected dividends: $Nil

d) Loss per share

Basic and diluted loss per share was calculated on the basis of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2021 amounting to 127,374,340 (year ended December 31, 2020 - 105,203,090, December 31, 2019 - 93,885,097) common shares. Stock options and warrants were considered anti-dilutive and therefore were excluded from the calculation of diluted (loss) income per share.

15. Share-Based Payments

The Company has an incentive Stock Option Plan under which non-transferable options to purchase common shares of the Company may be granted to directors, officers, employees or consultants of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. No amounts are paid or payable by the recipient on receipt of the option, and the exercise of the options granted is not dependent on any performance-based criteria. In accordance with these programs, options are exercisable at a price not less than the last closing price of the shares at the grant date.

Under this Stock Option Plan, unless otherwise determined by the board at the time of the granting of the options, 25% of the options granted vest on each of the 6 month, 12 month, 18 month and 24 month anniversaries of the grant date. As per the determination of the board, (a) the stock options granted on June 24, 2019, December 6, 2019, January 14, 2020, March 15, 2021, September 3, 2021 and September 29, 2021 and certain stock options granted on September 15, 2020 fully vested (or shall fully vest) on the 4 month anniversary of the grant date, and (b) other stock options granted on September 15, 2020 and all of the stock options granted October 1, 2021 vested on the grant date.

F-30


Loncor Gold Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

(Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share amounts)

The following tables summarize information about stock options:

For the year ended December 31, 2021
Exercise Price Range
(Cdn$)
Opening
Balance
During the period Closing
Balance
Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
life (years)
Vested &
Exercisable
Unvested
Granted Exercised Forfeiture Expired
0-0.70 5,505,000 4,096,000 (1,125,000) - - 8,476,000 3.55 6,080,000 2,396,000
Weighted Average
Exercise Price (Cdn$)
0.30 0.65 0.12     0.53   0.42  

For the year ended December 31, 2020
Exercise Price Range
(Cdn$)
Opening
Balance
During the year Closing
Balance
Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
life (years)
Vested &
Exercisable
Unvested
Granted Exercised Forfeiture Expired
0-0.70 4,840,000 665,000 - - - 5,505,000 3.07 5,153,750 351,250
Weighted Average Exercise Price (Cdn$) 0.27 0.54       0.30   0.30  

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company recognized in the statement of loss and comprehensive loss as share-based payments expense $782,815, respectively (year ended December 31, 2020 - $289,665 ; year ended December 31, 2019 - $154,789) representing the vesting of the fair value at the date of grant of stock options previously granted to employees, directors and officers under the Company's Stock Option Plan.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company recognized $251,527 representing the vesting of fair value at the date of grant of stock options previously granted to consultants, which was recorded under consulting, management and professional fees in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss (year ended December 31, 2020 - $135,876 ; year ended December 31, 2019 - $41,694). In addition, an amount of $138,308 for the year ended December 31, 2021 (year ended December 31, 2020 - $nil ; year ended December 31, 2019 - $8,117) related to stock options issued to employees of the Company's subsidiary in the Congo was capitalized to exploration and evaluation asset.

The value of the options was calculated using the Black-Scholes model and the assumptions at grant date and period end date were as follows:

(i) Risk-free interest rate: 0.26% - 1.66%, which is based on the Bank of Canada benchmark bonds yield 2 to 3 year rate in effect at the time of grant for bonds with maturity dates at the estimated term of the options

(ii) Expected volatility: 66.81% - 101.24%, which is based on the Company's historical stock prices

(iii) Expected life: 0.5 - 3 years

(iv) Expected dividends: $Nil

16. Lease obligations

The Company has a lease agreement for the head office location in Toronto, Canada with a monthly obligation of aproximately $16,500 (Cdn $22,500).

F-31


Loncor Gold Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

(Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share amounts)

Effective January 1, 2019, the Company adopted IFRS 16 to its accounting policy and recognized a right-of-use asset and a lease liability of $739,106 (Cdn $1,008,331) for its office lease agreement. On July 1, 2020 the right-of-use-asset was revalued at $687,957 (Cdn $932,123). The right-of-use asset is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The discount rate used to revalue the lease liability was 3.45%. As at December 31, 2021, the undiscounted cash flows for this office lease agreement to October 31, 2022 were $157,149 (Cdn $228,209).

Changes in the lease obligation for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were as follows:

    December 31, 2021     December 31, 2020  
Balance - beginning of the period $ 348,244   $ 591,183  
Liability settled $ (218,880 ) $ (213,183 )
Liability revaluation $ -   $ (51,149 )
Interest expense $ 9,320   $ 21,393  
Balance - end of the period $ 138,684   $ 348,244  
             
    Current portion $ 138,684   $ 188,370  
    Long-term portion $ -   $ 159,874  
Total lease obligation $ 138,684   $ 348,244  

For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company recognized lease revenues of $52,668 in the consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss from its sub-lease arrangement with Gentor Resources Inc. (year ended December 31, 2020 - $53,623; year ended December 31, 2019 - $106,774). The Company has an exploration office lease in Congo, which can be cancelled with three months notices in advance without any penalty. For the year ended December 31, 2021, the lease expense in the amount of $20,400 (year ended December 31, 2020 - $20,400; year ended December 31, 2019 - $20,400) in relation to the Congo office, was capitalized to exploration and evaluation assets.

17. Financial risk management objectives and policies

a) Fair value of financial assets and liabilities

The consolidated statements of financial position carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents, advances receivable and prepaid expenses, amounts due to/from related parties, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and the employee retention allowance approximate fair value due to their short-term nature.

Fair value hierarchy

The following table provides an analysis of financial instruments that are measured subsequent to initial recognition at fair value, grouped into Levels 1 to 3 based on the degree to which the fair value is observable:

  • Level 1 fair value measurements are those derived from quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

  • Level 2 fair value measurements are those derived from inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices);

  • Level 3 fair value measurements are those derived from valuation techniques that include inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs).

F-32


Loncor Gold Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

(Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share amounts)

There were no transfers between Level 1, 2 and 3 during the reporting period. Cash and cash equivalents are ranked Level 1 as the market value is readily observable. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value, as maturities are less than three months.

The fair value of warrants (note 14c) would be included in the hierarchy as follows:

At December 31st, 2021      
       
Liabilities: Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Canadian dollar common share purchase warrants - $0 -
       
At December 31st, 20120      
       
Liabilities: Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Canadian dollar common share purchase warrants - $0 -

b) Risk Management Policies

The Company is sensitive to changes in commodity prices and foreign-exchange. The Company's Board of Directors has overall responsibility for the establishment and oversight of the Company's risk management framework. Although the Company has the ability to address its price-related exposures through the use of options, futures and forward contracts, it does not generally enter into such arrangements.

c) Foreign Currency Risk

Foreign currency risk is the risk that a variation in exchange rates between the United States dollar and Canadian dollar or other foreign currencies will affect the Company's operations and financial results. A portion of the Company's transactions are denominated in Canadian dollars. The Company is also exposed to the impact of currency fluctuations on its monetary assets and liabilities. Significant foreign exchange gains or losses are reflected as a separate item in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss. The Company does not use derivative instruments to reduce its exposure to foreign currency risk.

The following table indicates the impact of foreign currency exchange risk on net working capital as at December 31, 2021 and 2020. The table below provides a sensitivity analysis of a 10 percent strengthening of the US dollar against the Canadian dollar which would have increased (decreased) the Company's net loss by the amounts shown in the table below. A 10 percent weakening of the US dollar against the Canadian dollar would have had the equal but opposite effect as at December 31, 2021 and 2020.

    December 31, 2021     December 31, 2020  
    Canadian dollar     Canadian dollar  
Cash and cash equivalents   167,659     260,173  
Advances receivable and prepaids   321,295     22,353  
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities   (638,137 )   (508,573 )
Due from related parties   176,309     42,619  
Due to related parties   (87,341 )   (355,419 )
Employee retention allowance   (234,471 )   (234,471 )
Loans   (34,993 )   (33,741 )
Total foreign currency financial assets and liabilities   (329,678 )   (807,060 )
Foreign exchange closing rate   0.7888     0.7854  
Total foreign currency financial assets and liabilities in US $   (260,050 )   (633,865 )
Impact of a 10% strengthening of the US $on net loss   (26,005 )   (63,386 )

 

F-33


Loncor Gold Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

(Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share amounts)

d) Credit Risk

Financial instruments which are potentially subject to credit risk for the Company consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and advances receivable and prepaid expenses. Cash and cash equivalents are maintained with several financial institutions of reputable credit and may be redeemed upon demand. It is therefore the Company's opinion that such credit risk is subject to normal industry risks and is considered minimal. The credit risk of advances receivable is, in management opinion, normal given ongoing relationships with those debtors.

The Company limits its exposure to credit risk on any investments by investing only in securities rated R1 (the highest rating) by credit rating agencies such as the DBRS (Dominion Bond Rating Service). Management continuously monitors the fair value of any investments to determine potential credit exposures. Short-term excess cash is invested in R1 rated investments including money market funds and other highly rated short-term investment instruments. Any credit risk exposure on cash balances is considered negligible as the Company places deposits only with major established banks in the countries in which it carries on operations.

The carrying amount of financial assets represents the maximum credit exposure. The Company's gross credit exposure at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 was as follows:

    December 31,  
2021
    December 31,
2020
 
Cash and cash equivalents $ 154,154   $ 256,624  
Advances receivable and prepaid expenses $ 345,193   $ 236,667  
  $ 499,347   $ 493,291  

e)  Liquidity Risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they become due. The Company attempts to ensure that there is sufficient cash to meet its liabilities when they are due and manages this risk by regularly evaluating its liquid financial resources to fund current and long-term obligations and to meet its capital commitments in a cost-effective manner. Temporary surplus funds of the Company are invested in short-term investments. The Company arranges the portfolio so that securities mature approximately when funds are needed. The key to success in managing liquidity is the degree of certainty in the cash flow projections. If future cash flows are fairly uncertain, the liquidity risk increases. The Company's liquidity requirements are met through a variety of sources, including cash and cash equivalents and equity capital markets. All financial obligations of the Company including accounts payable of $1,488,379 accrued liabilities of $83,663, due to related parties of $67,477, employee retention allowance of $184,951 and lease obligation of $138,684 are due within one year.

f) Mineral Property Risk

The Company's operations in the Congo are exposed to various levels of political risk and uncertainties, including political and economic instability, government regulations relating to exploration and mining, military repression and civil disorder, all or any of which may have a material adverse impact on the Company's activities or may result in impairment in or loss of part or all of the Company's assets.

g) Capital Management

The Company manages its common shares, warrants and stock options as capital. The Company's policy is to maintain sufficient capital base in order to meet its short term obligations and at the same time preserve investors' confidence required to sustain future development of the business.

F-34


Loncor Gold Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

(Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share amounts)

 
    December 31,
2021
    December 31,
2020
 
Share capital $ 94,480,512   $ 85,147,700  
Reserves $ 10,787,553   $ 8,940,059  
Deficit $ (66,933,241 ) $ (63,209,457 )
  $ 38,334,824   $ 30,878,302  

The Company's capital management objectives, policies and processes have remained unchanged during the years ended December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020.

The Company is not subject to any capital requirements imposed by a lending institution or regulatory body, other than the Toronto Stock Exchange ("TSX") which requires adequate working capital or financial resources such that, in the opinion of TSX, the listed issuer will be able to continue as a going concern. TSX will consider, among other things, the listed issuer's ability to meet its obligations as they come due, as well as its working capital position, quick asset position, total assets, capitalization, cash flow and earnings as well as accountants' or auditors' disclosures in the consolidated financial statements regarding the listed issuer's ability to continue as a going concern.

18. Supplemental cash flow information

During the periods indicated the Company undertook the following significant non-cash transactions:

      For the year ended  
  Note   December 31,
2021
    December 31,
2020
    December 31,
2019
 
                     
Depreciation included in exploration and evaluation assets 9 $ 28,445   $ 16,771   $ 4,878  
Exploration and evaluation expenditures paid by Barrick 9   1,975,162     4,267,816     2,762,890  
Fees paid by common shares, stock options or warrants 14b   278,866     264,119     364,760  

19. Employee retention allowance

The following table summarizes information about changes to the Company's employee retention provision during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.

Balance at December 31, 2019   180,519  
Foreign exchange adjustment   3,640  
Balance at December 31, 2020   184,159  
Foreign exchange adjustment   792  
Balance at December 31, 2021   184,951  

20. Income taxes

a) Provision for Income Taxes

Major items causing the Company's effective tax rate to differ from the combined Canadian federal and provincial statutory rate of 26.5% (2020 and 2019 - 26.5%, respectively) were as follows:

F-35


Loncor Gold Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

(Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share amounts)

 
    Years Ended December 31,  
    2021     2020     2019  
                   
Net loss for the year $ (3,723,784 ) $ (2,243,560 ) $ (1,650,745 )
                   
Expected income tax recovery based on statutory rate   (987,000 )   (595,000 )   (437,000 )
Adjustment to expected income tax benefit                  
Permanent differences   342,000     100,000     111,000  
Other   2,000     (7,000 )   54,000  
Change in unrecognized deferred tax asset   643,000     502,000     272,000  
Income tax provision (recovery) $ -   $ -   $ -  

b) Deferred Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes assets have not been recognized in respect to the following deductible temporary differences:

    Years Ended December 31,  
    2021     2020     2019  
                   
Non-capital losses carried forward $ 18,340,000   $ 16,251,000   $ 13,802,000  
Fixed assets - Canada $ 217,000     212,000     203,000  
Other - Canada $ 256,000     245,000     393,000  
Capital loss carry-forward - Canada $ 4,143,000     4,125,000     4,028,000  
Lease - Canada $ (28,000 )   (8,000 )   45,000  
Exploration and evaluation properties - Congo   51,393,000     42,364,000     35,225,000  
Total $ 74,321,000   $ 63,189,000   $ 53,696,000  

Non-capital losses in Canada expire in the following years:

2026 $ 261,000  
2027   135,000  
2028   196,000  
2029   674,000  
2030   1,520,000  
2031   2,593,000  
2032   2,187,000  
2033   1,946,000  
2034   870,000  
2035   560,000  
2036   612,000  
2037   541,000  
2038   675,000  
2039   1,032,000  
2040   2,449,000  
2041   2,089,322  
  $ 18,340,322  

 

F-36


Loncor Gold Inc.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As at December 31, 2021 and 2020 and for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019

(Expressed in U.S. dollars, except for per share amounts)

21. Government Assistance

In April 2020, the Government of Canada announced the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy ("CEWS") in order to help employers retain and/or return Canadian-based employees to payrolls in response to challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. Loncor determined that it met the employer eligibility criteria and applied for the CEWS retroactively to March 15, 2020. Cash payments of $30,295 (Cdn $40,604) were received in the year 2020. The Company has recorded a total gross subsidy of $nil under "interest and other income" in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, 2021 (year ended December 31, 2020 - $30,295).

In July 2020, the program was redesigned and extended until December 2020. In September and November 2020, the Government of Canada announced further extensions of the program to June 2021. The Company intends to continue its participation in the CEWS program, subject to meeting the eligibility requirements. There are no unfulfilled conditions or other contingencies attaching to the current CEWS program.

22. Events after the reporting period

In February 2022, the Company completed a non-brokered private placement of 5,650,000 units of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.55 per unit for gross proceeds of $2,447,236 (Cdn$3,107,500). Each such unit consists of one common share of the Company and one-half of one common share purchase warrant (each whole common share purchase warrant, a "C-Warrant") of the Company, with each C-Warrant entitling the holder thereof to acquire one common share of the Company at an exercise price of Cdn$0.75 for a period of 24 months following the closing date of the issuance of the units.The Company intends to use the proceeds from the financing for the continued development of the Company's Adumbi and Makapela gold deposits and for general corporate purposes.

 



EXHIBIT 2.1

Description of the Registered Securities

The rights of shareholders of Loncor Gold Inc. (the "Company") are governed by the Ontario Business Corporations Act ("OBCA") and the Company's articles and by-laws.  The Company's authorized share capital consists of an unlimited number of common shares, without par value, and an unlimited number of preference shares, issuable in series, without par value.

Item 9.A.3

The Company's common shares do not contain any pre-emptive purchase rights.

Item 9.A.5

The Company's class of common shares are registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.  The Company may issue an unlimited number of common shares, without par value.  Other than under applicable securities laws, there are no restrictions on the transferability of common shares.

Item 9.A.6

See 10.B. 3 below.

Item 9.A.7

As of the end of the period covered by the Annual Report on Form 20-F with which this exhibit is filed, the Company's common shares are the only class of Company securities that are registered under Section 12 of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 

Item 10.B.3

The following is a summary of the material provisions attaching to the Company's common shares and preference shares (there are currently no preference shares outstanding).

Common Shares - The holders of the common shares are entitled to receive notice of and to attend all meetings of the shareholders of the Company and shall have one vote for each common share held at all meetings of the shareholders of the Company, except for meetings at which only holders of another specified class or series of shares are entitled to vote separately as a class or series.  Subject to the prior rights of the holders of the preference shares or any other shares ranking senior to the common shares, the holders of the common shares are entitled to (a) receive any dividends as and when declared by the board of directors of the Company (the "Board"), out of the assets of the Company properly applicable to the payment of dividends, in such amount and in such form as the Board may from time to time determine, and (b) receive the remaining property of the Company in the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company.

Preference Shares - The Board may issue the preferences shares at any time and from time to time in one or more series, each series of which shall have the designations, rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions fixed by the directors.  The preference shares of each series shall rank on a parity with the preference shares of every other series, and shall be entitled to priority over the common shares and any other shares of the Company ranking junior to the preference shares, with respect to priority in the payment of dividends and the return of capital and the distribution of assets of the Company in the event of the liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company. 


Item 10.B.4

The Company is a corporation governed by the Ontario Business Corporations Act (the "OBCA").  Under the OBCA, the articles of the Company may, by "special resolution" (see below for definition), be amended to add, change or remove any rights, privileges, restrictions and conditions, including rights to accrued dividends, in respect of all or any of its shares, whether issued or unissued.  Under the OBCA, "special resolution" means a resolution passed by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the votes cast by the shareholders who voted in respect of that resolution or signed by all the shareholders entitled to vote on that resolution.

Item 10.B.6

There are no limitations under the laws of Canada or in the organizational documents of the Company on the right of foreigners to hold or vote securities of the Company, except that the Investment Canada Act (the "ICA") may require review and approval by the Minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development ("ISED") of certain acquisitions of "control" of the Company by a "non-Canadian".  The threshold for acquisitions is generally defined as being one-third or more of the voting shares of the Company.  "Non-Canadian" generally means an individual who is not a Canadian citizen, or a corporation, partnership, trust or joint venture that is ultimately controlled by non-Canadians.

Under the ICA, transactions exceeding certain financial thresholds, and which involve the acquisition of control of a Canadian business by a non-Canadian, are subject to review and cannot be implemented unless the ISED Minister and/or, in the case of a Canadian business engaged in cultural activities, the Minister of Canadian Heritage, are satisfied that the transaction is likely to be of "net benefit to Canada".  If a transaction is subject to review (a "Reviewable Transaction"), an application for review must be filed with the Investment Review Division of ISED Canada and/or the Department of Canadian Heritage prior to the implementation of the Reviewable Transaction.  The responsible Minister is then required to determine whether the Reviewable Transaction is likely to be of net benefit to Canada, taking into account, among other things, certain factors specified in the ICA and any written undertakings that may have been given by the applicant.  The ICA contemplates an initial review period of up to 45 days after filing; however, if the responsible Minister has not completed the review by that date, s/he may unilaterally extend the review period by up to 30 days (or such longer period as may be agreed to by the applicant and the Minister) to permit completion of the review.  If the responsible Minister is not satisfied that the investment is likely to be of net benefit to Canada, s/he may prohibit the investment or order a divestiture (if the investment has already been completed).

If the transaction is not reviewable because it does not meet or exceed the applicable financial threshold, the non-Canadian investor must still give notice to ISED Canada and, in the case of a Canadian business engaged in cultural activities, Canadian Heritage, of its acquisition of control of a Canadian business within 30 days of the implementation of the investment.

Furthermore, under the ICA, every investment in, or acquisition of control of, a Canadian business by a non-Canadian is subject to a "national security" review which examines whether the transaction could be injurious to Canada's national security.  There is no minimum threshold for the size of transaction potentially subject to such review.  If the ISED Minister, after consultation with the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness and the investor, considers that the investment could be injurious to national security, the Minister refers the matter to the Governor in Council.  Following its review, if the Governor in Council may take any measures in respect of the investment that it considers advisable to protect national security, including denying the investment, asking for undertakings, imposing terms or conditions for the investment or ordering a divestiture (if the investment has already been completed).


Item 10.B 7

There are no provisions in the Company's articles or by-laws that would have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of the Company and that operate only with respect to a merger, acquisition or corporate restructuring involving the Company (or any of its subsidiaries).

Item 10.B 8

There are no provisions in the Company's by-laws requiring disclosure of share ownership.

In general, under applicable securities regulation in Canada, a person or company who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, voting securities of an issuer or who exercises control or direction over voting securities of an issuer or a combination of both, carrying more than 10% of the voting rights attached to all the issuer's outstanding voting securities is an insider and must, within 10 days of becoming an insider, file a report in the required form effective the date on which the person became an insider.  The report must disclose any direct or indirect beneficial ownership of, or control or direction over, securities of the reporting issuer.  Additionally, securities regulation in Canada provides for the filing of a report by an insider of a reporting issuer whose holdings change, which report must be filed within five days from the day on which the change takes place.

Item 10.B 9

See Items 10.B 3 10.B 6 and 10.B.8 above.

Item 10.B.10

There are no conditions imposed by the Company's articles governing changes in the Company's capital, where such provisions are more stringent than those required by law.

Items 12.A; 12.B.; 12.C.; 12.D.1; 12.D.2

N/A



EXHIBIT 4.1

LONCOR GOLD INC.

Stock Option Plan

 The board of directors of Loncor Gold Inc. (the "Corporation") wishes to establish a stock option plan (the "Plan") governing the issuance of stock options (the "Stock Options") to directors, officers and employees of the Corporation or subsidiaries of the Corporation and persons or corporations who provide services to the Corporation or its subsidiaries on an on-going basis, or have provided or are expected to provide a service or services of considerable value to the Corporation or its subsidiaries.  Capitalized terms, not otherwise defined herein, have the meanings ascribed thereto in the TSX Venture Exchange Corporate Finance Manual.

 The terms and conditions of the Plan for issuance of Stock Options are as follows:

1. Purposes

 The principal purposes of the Plan are:

(a) to retain and attract qualified directors, officers, employees and service providers which the Corporation and its subsidiaries require;

(b) to promote a proprietary interest in the Corporation and its subsidiaries;

(c) to provide an incentive element in compensation; and

(d) to promote the profitability of the Corporation and its subsidiaries.

2. Reservation of Shares

 The total number of common shares in the capital of the Corporation ("Common Shares") issuable upon the exercise of all outstanding Stock Options granted under this Plan shall not at any time exceed 10% of the total number of outstanding Common Shares, from time to time.  This Plan is considered an "evergreen" plan, since the Common Shares covered by Stock Options which have been exercised or terminated shall be available for subsequent grants under this Plan and the number of Stock Options available to grant increases as the number of outstanding Common Shares increases.   

3. Eligibility

 Stock Options shall be granted only to persons, firms or corporations ("Eligible Optionees") who are Directors, Employees, Consultants or Management Company Employees of the Corporation or a subsidiary of the Corporation.  Where the Eligible Optionee is an Employee, Consultant or Management Company Employee, the board of directors of the Corporation (the "Board") shall confirm that the Eligible Optionee is a bona fide Employee, Consultant or Management Company Employee, as the case may be, of the Corporation or a subsidiary of the Corporation prior to any grant of Stock Options.

 Stock Options may also be granted to a corporation which is wholly-owned by an Eligible Optionee if the corporation agrees not to effect or permit any transfer of ownership or option of shares of the corporation, nor to issue further shares of any class in the corporation to any other individual or entity as long as any Stock Options granted to the corporation remain outstanding, without the prior written consent of the TSX Venture Exchange.  Unless the context otherwise requires, the term Eligible Optionee as used herein, shall include any such corporation.


4. Granting of Stock Options

 The Board may from time to time grant Stock Options to Eligible Optionees.  At the time a Stock Option is granted, the Board shall determine the number of Common Shares of the Corporation available for purchase under the Stock Option, the date when the Stock Option is to become effective and, subject to the other provisions of this Plan, all other terms and conditions of the Stock Option. 

5. Exercise Price

              The exercise price (the "Exercise Price") of each Stock Option shall be determined in the discretion of the Board at the time of the granting of the Stock Option, provided that the exercise price shall not be lower than the "Market Price".  "Market Price" shall mean the last closing price of the Common Shares on the TSX Venture Exchange prior to the date the Stock Option is granted; provided that in the event the Common Shares are not listed on the TSX Venture Exchange but are listed on another stock exchange or stock exchanges, the foregoing reference to the TSX Venture Exchange shall be deemed to be a reference to such other stock exchange, or if more than one, to such one as shall be designated by the Board, and to the extent that the Common Shares are not listed on any exchange, the Market Price shall be such price as is determined by the Board in good faith.

6. Term and Exercise Periods

(a) All Stock Options shall be for a term determined in the discretion of the Board at the time of the granting of the Stock Options, provided that no Stock Option shall have a term exceeding five years and, unless the Board at any time makes a specific determination otherwise, a Stock Option and all rights to purchase Common Shares pursuant thereto shall expire and terminate immediately upon the Eligible Optionee who holds such Stock Option ceasing to be at least one of a Director, Employee, Management Company Employee or Consultant of the Corporation or a subsidiary of the Corporation. 

(b) Unless otherwise determined by the Board at the time of the granting of the Stock Options pursuant to clause 6(c)(iii) below, 1/4 of the Stock Options granted pursuant hereto will vest on each of the 6 month, 12 month, 18 month and 24 month anniversaries of the date of the grant of the Stock Options (the "Grant Date").  For greater clarity, unless otherwise determined pursuant to the terms hereof, all Stock Options granted to an Eligible Optionee will be available to exercise and purchase Common Shares on the 24 month anniversary of the Grant Date.

(c) By way of example, without limiting the generality of the foregoing or the discretion of the Board, the Board may, at the time of the granting of the Stock Option, determine:

(i) that a Stock Option is exercisable only while the Eligible Optionee remains at least one of a Director, Employee, Management Company Employee or Consultant and for a limited period of time ("Additional Period") after the Eligible Optionee ceases to be at least one of a Director, Employee, Management Company Employee or Consultant (which Additional Period may not exceed 90 days or, in the case of an Eligible Optionee engaged in Investor Relations Activities, 30 days);


(ii) that a Stock Option can be exercisable for an Additional Period or for its remaining term (which Additional Period or remaining term may not exceed one year) after the death, disability or incapacity of an Eligible Optionee;

(iii) that a Stock Option has a different vesting schedule than that specified in subsection 6(b) above; or

(iv) that a Stock Option may provide for early exercise and/or termination or other adjustment in the event of a death of a person and in other circumstances, such as if the Corporation shall resolve to sell all or substantially all of its assets, to liquidate or dissolve, or to merge, amalgamate, consolidate or be absorbed with or into any other corporation, if a take-over bid is made for Common Shares of the Corporation, or if any change of control of the Corporation occurs.

7. Non-Assignability

Other than a limited right of assignment, subject to the terms upon which the Stock Option is granted, in the event of the death of an Eligible Optionee to allow the exercise of Stock Options by the Eligible Optionee's legal representative, Stock Options shall not be assignable or transferable by the Eligible Optionees.

8. Payment of Exercise Price

All shares issued pursuant to the exercise of a Stock Option shall be paid for in full in Canadian funds at the time of exercise of the Stock Option and prior to the issue of the shares.  All Common Shares issued in accordance with the foregoing shall be issued as fully paid and non-assessable Common Shares.

9. Non-Exercise

 If any Stock Option granted pursuant to the Plan is not exercised for any reason whatsoever, upon the expiry of the Stock Options pursuant to the terms of its grant or the terms hereof, the shares reserved and authorized for issuance pursuant to such Stock Option shall revert to the Plan and shall be available for other Stock Options.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, at no time shall there be outstanding Stock Options exceeding, in the aggregate, the number of Common Shares reserved for issuance pursuant to Stock Options under this Plan.

10. Adjustment in Certain Circumstances

 In the event:

(a) of any change in the Common Shares through subdivision, consolidation, reclassification, amalgamation, merger or otherwise; or

(b) of any stock dividend to holders of Common Shares (other than such stock dividends issued at the option of shareholders of the Corporation in lieu of substantially equivalent cash dividends); or

(c) that any rights are granted to holders of Common Shares to purchase Common Shares at prices substantially below fair market value; or


(d) that as a result of any recapitalization, merger, consolidation or otherwise the Common Shares are converted into or exchangeable for any other shares;

then in any such case the Board may make such adjustment in the Plan and in the Stock Options granted under the Plan as the Board may in its sole discretion deem appropriate to prevent substantial dilution or enlargement of the rights granted to, or available for, holders of Stock Options, and such adjustments may be included in the Stock Options.

11. Expenses

 All expenses in connection with the Plan shall be borne by the Corporation.

12. Compliance with Laws

 The Corporation shall not be obliged to issue any shares upon exercise of Stock Options if the issue would violate any law or regulation or any rule of any governmental authority or stock exchange. The Corporation shall not be required to issue, register or qualify for resale any shares issuable upon exercise of Stock Options pursuant to the provisions of a prospectus or similar document, provided that the Corporation shall notify the TSX Venture Exchange or any other stock exchange on which the shares of the Corporation are listed and any other appropriate regulatory bodies in Canada of the existence of the Plan and the issuance and exercise of Stock Options.

 In addition to any resale restrictions that may be applicable under applicable securities laws, all Stock Options and any shares issued on the exercise of Stock Options shall be legended with a four month hold period from the date the Stock Options are granted, as required by the rules of the TSX Venture Exchange.

13. Disinterested Shareholder Approval

 Disinterested shareholder approval shall be obtained by the Corporation prior to any reduction in the Exercise Price if the Optionee is an Insider of the Corporation at the time of a proposed reduction of the Exercise Price.

14. Form of Stock Option Agreement

 All Stock Options shall be issued by the Corporation in a form which meets the general requirements and conditions set forth in this Plan and the requirements of the TSX Venture Exchange or such other exchange on which the shares of the Corporation are listed from time to time.

15. Amendments and Termination

 The Corporation shall retain the right to (a) amend from time to time the terms of the Plan or to terminate the Plan by resolution of the Board, and (b) amend from time to time the terms of outstanding Stock Options by resolution of the Board.  Any such amendments or termination shall be subject to the consent of any applicable regulatory body, including any stock exchange on which the Corporation's shares are listed (to the extent such consent is required).  Any amendment to the terms of outstanding Stock Options shall be subject to the consent of the Eligible Optionee holding such Stock Options.  Any amendment to the terms of the Plan shall take effect only with respect to Stock Options granted thereafter, provided that such amendment may apply to any Stock Options previously granted with the consent of the Eligible Optionees holding such Stock Options.


16. Delegation of Administration of the Plan

 Subject to the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) or any other legislation governing the Corporation, the Board may delegate to one or more directors of the Corporation, on such terms as it considers appropriate, all or any part of the powers, duties and functions relating to the granting of Stock Options and the administration of the Plan.

17. Applicable Law

              This Plan shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws in force in the Province of Ontario.

18. Stock Exchange

 To the extent applicable, the issuance of any shares of the Corporation pursuant to Stock Options issued pursuant to this Plan is subject to approval of the Plan and the issuance of the Stock Options by the TSX Venture Exchange or other stock exchange upon which the Common Shares are listed, and the Plan shall be subject to the ongoing requirements of such exchange.

19. Administration

 This Plan shall be administered by the Board.  The Board shall have full and final discretion to interpret the provisions of this Plan and to prescribe, amend, rescind and waive rules and regulations to govern the administration and operation of this Plan.  All decisions and interpretations made by the Board shall be binding and conclusive upon the Corporation and on all persons eligible to participate in this Plan, subject to shareholder approval if required by any stock exchange on which the Corporation's shares are listed.

20. Limitation on Shares Issuable to Insiders

(a) The total number of Common Shares issued to "insiders" (as such term is defined in Part 1 of the TSX Company Manual) of the Corporation, within any one year period, under all "security based compensation arrangements" (within the meaning of the rules of the Toronto Stock Exchange) of the Corporation shall not exceed 10% of the total number of outstanding Common Shares. 

(b) The total number of Common Shares issuable to "insiders" (as such term is defined in Part 1 of the TSX Company Manual) of the Corporation, at any time, under all "security based compensation arrangements" (within the meaning of the rules of the Toronto Stock Exchange) of the Corporation shall not exceed 10% of the total number of outstanding Common Shares. 



EXHIBIT 8.1

List of subsidiaries of the Company

Name of Subsidiary Place of Incorporation Proportion of
Ownership
Interest
Direct/Indirect
Loncor Resources Congo SARL Democratic Republic of the Congo 100% Direct
Devon Resources SARL Democratic Republic of the Congo 100% Indirect
Navarro Resources SARL Democratic Republic of the Congo 100% Indirect
Loncor Kilo Inc. Ontario, Canada 100% Direct
Adumbi Mining S.A. Democratic Republic of the Congo 84.68% Indirect
KGL Isiro Atlantic Ltd British Virgin Islands 100% Indirect
Isiro (Jersey) Limited Jersey 100% Indirect
KGL Isiro SARL Democratic Republic of the Congo 100% Indirect
Nevada Bob's Franchising, Inc. (this subsidiary is dormant) Delaware, USA 100% Direct



CERTIFICATION

I, John Barker, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Loncor Gold Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:

 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

 

Date:  May 2, 2022

By:

/s/ John Barker

    John Barker
Chief Executive Officer



CERTIFICATION

I, Donat K. Madilo, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Loncor Gold Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:

 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

 

Date:  May 2, 2022

By:

/s/ Donat K. Madilo

    Donat K. Madilo
Chief Financial Officer



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Loncor Gold Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Barker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

May 2, 2022 /s/ John Barker                                
  John Barker
  Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Loncor Gold Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Donat K. Madilo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

May 2, 2022 /s/ Donat K. Madilo                                              
  Donat K. Madilo
  Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS FOR THE YEAR ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2021

The following management's discussion and analysis ("MD&A"), which is dated as of March 31, 2022, provides a review of the activities, results of operations and financial condition of Loncor Gold Inc. (the "Company" or "Loncor") as at and for the financial year of the Company ended December 31, 2021 ("fiscal 2021") in comparison with those as at and for the financial year of the Company ended December 31, 2020 ("fiscal 2020"), as well as future prospects of the Company. This MD&A should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company for fiscal 2021 and fiscal 2020 (the "Annual Financial Statements").  As the Company's consolidated financial statements are prepared in United States dollars, all dollar amounts in this MD&A are expressed in United States dollars unless otherwise specified. Additional information relating to the Company, including the Company's annual information form dated March 31, 2022, is available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.

Forward-Looking Statements

The following MD&A contains forward-looking statements. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, that address activities, events or developments that the Company believes, expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future (including, without limitation, statements regarding mineral resource estimates, potential mineral resource increases, exploration results, future drilling and other future exploration, potential mineral resources, results of the Adumbi deposit Preliminary Economic Assessment ("PEA"), potential underground mineral resources, potential mineralization and future plans and objectives of the Company) are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements reflect the current expectations or beliefs of the Company based on information currently available to the Company. Forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that may cause the actual results of the Company to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements, and even if such actual results are realized or substantially realized, there can be no assurance that they will have the expected consequences to, or effects on the Company. Factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from current expectations include, among other things, the possibility that actual circumstances will differ from the estimates and assumptions used in the Adumbi PEA, possibility that drilling or development programs will be delayed, risks related to the exploration stage of the Company's mineral properties, uncertainties relating to the availability and costs of financing needed in the future, activities of the Company may be adversely impacted by the continued spread of COVID-19, the possibility that future exploration (including drilling) or development results will not be consistent with the Company's expectations, changes in equity markets, changes in gold prices, failure to establish estimated mineral resources (the Company's mineral resource figures are estimates and no assurances can be given that the indicated levels of gold will be produced), fluctuations in currency exchange rates, inflation, political developments in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (the "DRC"), changes to regulations affecting the Company's activities, delays in obtaining or failure to obtain required project approvals, the uncertainties involved in interpreting geological data, and the other risks involved in the mineral exploration business. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made and, except as may be required by applicable securities laws, the Company disclaims any intent or obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or results or otherwise. Although the Company believes that the assumptions inherent in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and accordingly undue reliance should not be placed on such statements due to the inherent uncertainty therein.


Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors

National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101") is a rule of the Canadian Securities Administrators which establishes standards for all public disclosure an issuer makes of scientific and technical information concerning mineral projects.  Unless otherwise indicated, all resource estimates contained in this MD&A have been prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 and the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum Classification System.  These standards differ from the requirements of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, and resource information contained in this MD&A may not be comparable to similar information disclosed by U.S. companies. 

General

Loncor is a Canadian gold exploration company focussed on the Ngayu Greenstone Gold Belt in the northeast of the DRC.  The Loncor team has over two decades of experience of operating in the DRC.  Loncor's growing resource base in the Ngayu Belt currently comprises the Imbo and Makapela Projects.  At the Imbo Project, the Adumbi deposit holds an indicated mineral resource of 1.88 million ounces of gold (28.185 million tonnes grading 2.08 g/t gold), and the Adumbi deposit and two neighbouring deposits hold an inferred mineral resource of 2.090 million ounces of gold (22.508 million tonnes grading 2.89 g/t Au), with 84.68% of these resources being attributable to Loncor via its 84.68% interest in the Imbo Project.  Following a drilling program carried out by the Company at the Adumbi deposit in 2020-2021, the Company completed a Preliminary Economic Assessment ("PEA") of the Adumbi deposit and announced the results of the PEA in December 2021. The Makapela Project (which is 100%-owned by Loncor and is located approximately 50 kilometres from the Imbo Project) has an indicated mineral resource of 614,200 ounces of gold (2.20 million tonnes grading 8.66 g/t Au) and an inferred mineral resource of 549,600 ounces of gold (3.22 million tonnes grading 5.30 g/t Au). 

The Company also has, through a DRC subsidiary or under option from third parties, 46 mineral exploration permits with respect to properties in North Kivu province of the DRC. All of the 46 North Kivu exploration permits are currently under force majeure due to the poor security situation in North Kivu province.

In February 2022, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement of 5,650,000 units of the Company (the "C-Units") at a price of Cdn$0.55 per C-Unit for gross proceeds of Cdn$3,107,500. Each C-Unit consists of one common share of the Company and one-half of one common share purchase warrant (each whole common share purchase warrant, a "C-Warrant") of the Company, with each C-Warrant entitling the holder thereof to acquire one common share of the Company at an exercise price of Cdn$0.75 for a period of 24 months following the issuance of the C-Units. The Company intends to use the proceeds from this financing for continued development of the Company's Adumbi and Makapela gold deposits and for general corporate purposes.


In January 2022, the Company filed on SEDAR a National Instrument 43-101 technical report relating to the Preliminary Economic Assessment ("PEA") of the Company's Adumbi gold deposit. Reference is made to the Company's December 15, 2021 and January 31, 2022 press releases for the results of the PEA. Based on the positive results of the PEA, further work is warranted at Adumbi to advance the project up the value curve by completing follow up feasibility studies on the project.

In November 2021, the Company announced an increase and upgrade in mineral resources at its Adumbi deposit.  Compared to the inferred mineral resource of 3.15 million ounces of gold (41.316 million tonnes grading 2.37 g/t Au) outlined in April 2021, the additional drilling information and the increased gold price used contributed significantly to the increased mineral resources of the Adumbi deposit with improved confidence to 1.88 million ounces of gold (28.185 million tonnes grading 2.08 g/t gold) in the indicated category and 1.78 million ounces of gold (20.828 million tonnes grading 2.65 g/t gold) in the inferred category.  84.68% of these mineral resources are attributable to Loncor via its 84.68% interest in the Imbo Project. 

From November 2020 to November 2021, the Company announced assay results from its drilling program at its Adumbi deposit. Reference is made to the Company's November 11, 2021, October 21, 2021, October 12, 2021, September 14, 2021, August 20, 2021, July 12, 2021, May 25, 2021, March 25, 2021, March 4, 2021, February 18, 2021, January 5, 2021, December 22, 2020 and November 30, 2020 press releases for details of drilling results reported.

In a press release dated September 21, 2021, the Company announced the appointment of Mr. John Barker as Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") of Loncor. Mr. Barker, who was Vice President of Business Development of Loncor prior to his appointment as CEO, has 17 years' experience as a leading mining equity analyst including a period as Chairman of The Association of UK Mining Analysts. Arnold Kondrat ("Mr. Kondrat"), Founder of Loncor and previous CEO, has been appointed as the Company's Executive Chairman of the Board.

In July 2021, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement of 7,850,000 units of the Company (the "B-Units") at a price of Cdn$0.70 per B-Unit for gross proceeds of Cdn$5,495,000. Each B-Unit consists of one common share of the Company and one-half of one common share purchase warrant (each whole common share purchase warrant, a "B-Warrant") of the Company, with each B-Warrant entitling the holder thereof to acquire one common share of the Company at an exercise price of Cdn$0.95 for a period of 12 months following the closing date of the issuance of the B-Units. The uses of proceeds from this financing were for continued exploration and development of the Company's Imbo Project, including additional drilling and funding of the PEA, and for general corporate purposes.

In a press release dated June 17, 2021, the Company announced that it had awarded the PEA to SENET and Minecon Resources and Services Limited.

On June 11, 2021, the Company filed on SEDAR an updated National Instrument 43-101 technical report relating to the Company's Imbo Project, in particular, the increased gold mineral resource estimate for the Adumbi deposit found within the Imbo Project reported in the Company's April 27, 2021 press release. This technical report, which was prepared by Minecon Resource and Services Limited, has an effective date April 27, 2021 and is entitled "Updated Resource Statement and Independent National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report, Imbo Project, Ituri Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo".


In June 2021, the Company changed its name from Loncor Resources Inc. to Loncor Gold Inc. to better brand Loncor's business as a gold exploration company. Loncor's common shares commenced trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange ("TSX") under the new name at the opening of trading on Thursday, June 10, 2021. The Company's trading symbol on the TSX remained "LN".

In May 2021, the Company announced that Barrick Gold informed Loncor that it will not be continuing exploration on the Loncor/Barrick joint venture ground (which ground covered approximately 2,000 square kilometers of the Ngayu greenstone belt). Loncor is assessing the results of the Barrick joint venture program to determine whether further exploration by Loncor on the joint venture ground is warranted. In particular, the Mongaliema target, which is only seven kilometres from Loncor's Makapela deposit, is planned to be further investigated by Loncor especially as this promising target has not been drilled by Barrick. Mongaliema will be evaluated to determine whether it has the resource potential to be combined with the nearby Makapela deposit. The high grade of the Makapela deposit also affords the potential for this resource to be transported to a central processing facility at Adumbi.

In April 2021, the Company announced a 44% increase in mineral resources at its Adumbi deposit. Compared to the inferred mineral resource of 2.19 million ounces of gold (28.97 million tonnes grading 2.35 g/t Au) outlined in April 2020 (see Company press release dated April 17, 2020), further drilling increased the Adumbi inferred mineral resource by 44% to 3.15 million ounces of gold (41.316 million tonnes grading 2.37 g/t Au), constrained within a US$1,500 open pit shell. This mineral resource assessment was undertaken by the Company's independent geological consultants Minecon Resources and Services Limited.  The updated estimate for Adumbi was based on the additional drilling and a review of the Adumbi deposit including remodeling, grade and considering the CIM requirement for mineral resources to have "reasonable prospects for economic extraction".

In a press release dated February 24, 2021, the Company announced that soil geochemical results have outlined four significant, undrilled mineralised trends at its 84.68%-owned Imbo Project. The focus of greenfields exploration by Loncor is at Imbo East, along trend to the southeast from the Adumbi, Kitenge and Manzako deposits previously delineated in the northwest of the 122 square kilometre project area. Analytical results were received for all soil samples from the completed 5.4 kilometre by 2.3 kilometre grid, east of the Imbo River where soil samples were collected every 40 metres on lines 160 metres apart. Geological mapping, soil geochemical, rock chips and channel sampling of old colonial trenches and artisanal workings have outlined four significant mineralised trends - Esio Wapi, Museveni, Mungo Iko and Paradis - approximately 8 to 10 kilometres southeast of the Adumbi deposit. Additional infill soil sampling, augering and channel sampling will be undertaken at Esio Wapi, Paradis, Museveni and Mungo Iko to better define these mineralised trends prior to outlining drill targets.

In February 2021, the Company closed a non-brokered private placement financing, involving the issue of 11,500,000 units of the Company (the "A-Units") at a price of Cdn$0.50 per A-Unit for gross proceeds of Cdn$5,750,000. Each A-Unit consists of one common share of the Company and one-half of one common share purchase warrant (each whole common share purchase warrant, an "A-Warrant") of the Company, with each A-Warrant entitling the holder thereof to acquire one common share of the Company at an exercise price of Cdn$0.75 for a period of 12 months following the closing date of the issuance of the A-Units. A total of 1,400,000 of the A-Units were purchased by certain insiders of the Company. The uses of proceeds from this financing were for continued exploration and development of the Company's Imbo Project and for general corporate purposes.


In November 2020, the Company announced that it had entered into two new agreements with its then joint venture partner Barrick Gold (DRC) Limited relating to the Loncor/Barrick joint venture in the Ngayu greenstone belt.

In October 2020, the Company announced that it commenced drilling on its 84.68% owned Imbo Project.             

In September 2020, the Company announced that recent exploration results have outlined a number of significant, undrilled mineralised trends at its 84.68%-owned Imbo Project. Reference is made to the Company's September 21, 2020 press release for details of sampling results reported at the Esio Wapi, Paradis and Museveni prospects located in the eastern part of the Imbo Project.

Also in September 2020, the Company reported that its subsidiary, Adumbi Mining, was restructured as per the requirements of the OHADA (Organization for the Harmonization of Business Law in Africa) Uniform Act relating to commercial companies.  OHADA Uniform Acts provide for a system of common business laws which have been adopted by seventeen West and Central African countries, including the DRC.  The restructuring resulted in Loncor increasing its interest in Adumbi Mining to 84.68%, minority shareholders holding 5.32% and the DRC 10%.  The DRC was allocated 10% in accordance with the requirements of the new DRC Mining Code enacted in 2018.  Also, as a result of the restructuring, Adumbi Mining now operates as "Adumbi Mining S.A." rather than Adumbi Mining SARL.

In a press release dated September 2, 2020, the Company reported that its common shares are now quoted on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange under the trading symbol LO51.

In August 2020, the Company completed a private placement of 10,000,000 common shares of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.50 per share for gross proceeds of Cdn$5,000,000.  A total of 3,390,000 of these shares were purchased by certain insiders of the Company. The uses of proceeds from this financing were for the drill program on the Adumbi deposit at the Company's Imbo Project and for general corporate purposes. 

In a press release dated June 24, 2020, the Company announced that its subsidiary, Adumbi Mining, had entered into a joint venture agreement with Barrick for two exploitation permits held by Adumbi Mining covering ground contiguous to the Company's Imva area within the Ngayu greenstone belt in the northeast of the DRC.

Also in June 2020, the Company announced that Barrick had commenced its core drilling program on several priority gold targets within the Ngayu greenstone belt pursuant to the then Loncor/Barrick joint venture. Since entering into the first JV agreement with Loncor in January 2016, Barrick had conducted various exploratory programs to define drill targets, targets that offered the early potential of attaining "Tier 1" status.

The Company also provided an update in June 2020 of exploration activities by Loncor at Loncor's Imbo Project. 


In a press release dated June 10, 2020, the Company announced that it filed on SEDAR an independent National Instrument 43-101 technical report relating to the Company's Imbo Project, in particular, the updated gold mineral resource estimates for the Imbo Project reported in the Company's April 17, 2020 press release (which update resulted in a 49% increase in mineral resources at the Imbo Project).  The technical report, which was prepared by Minecon Resources and Services Limited, has an effective date of April 17, 2020 and is entitled "Independent National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report on the Imbo Project, Ituri Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo".

In March 2020, the Company announced that it had acquired an additional 5.04% of its subsidiary Adumbi Mining pursuant to a private transaction with one of the former minority shareholders of Adumbi Mining.  This acquisition increased the Company's interest in Adumbi Mining from 71.25% to 76.29% (this interest was subsequently increased to 84.68% as set out above). 

In February 2020, the Company completed a private placement of 6,000,000 common shares of the Company at a price of Cdn$0.40 per share for gross proceeds of Cdn$2,400,000. The use of proceeds from this financing was general corporate purposes. A total of 1,790,000 of the said shares were purchased by certain insiders of the Company, including Mr. Kondrat, who purchased 1,440,000 of the said shares.

Qualified Person

Peter N. Cowley, a director and President of the Company and a "qualified person" as such term is defined in National Instrument 43-101, has reviewed and approved the technical information in this MD&A.

Technical Reports

Additional information with respect to the Company's Adumbi deposit (and other properties of the Company within its Imbo Project) is contained in the technical report of New SENET (Pty) Ltd and Minecon Resources and Services Limited dated December 15, 2021 and entitled "NI 43-101 Preliminary Economic Assessment of the Adumbi Deposit in the Democratic Republic of the Congo".  A copy of the said report can be obtained from SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov.

Additional information with respect to the Company's Makapela Project, and certain other properties of the Company in the Ngayu gold belt, is contained in the technical report of Venmyn Rand (Pty) Ltd dated May 29, 2012 and entitled "Updated National Instrument 43-101 Independent Technical Report on the Ngayu Gold Project, Orientale Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo". A copy of the said report can be obtained from SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov.

Selected Annual Information

The following financial data is derived from the Company's consolidated financial statements for each of the three most recently completed financial years. This financial data has been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.


    2021     2020     2019  
Net loss $ (3,723,784 ) $ (2,243,560 ) $ (1,650,745 )
Net loss per share $ (0.03 ) $ (0.02 ) $ (0.02 )
Total assets $ 40,325,580   $ 32,670,862   $ 29,674,857  
Total liabilities $ 1,990,756   $ 1,792,560   $ 2,387,821  
Total non-current liabilities $ 27,602   $ 186,375   $ 418,823  

For fiscal 2021, the Company had a net loss of $3,723,784, a significant increase from the prior year loss of $2,243,560. Employee benefits expense increased to $1,097,977 (2020 - $555,150) as a result of an increase in employees and their related costs at head office during 2021. Share-based payments also increased from $289,665 during fiscal 2020 to $782,815 during fiscal 2021. In addition, office expenses increased to $232,011 in 2021 from $128,323 in fiscal 2020 as a result of increased filing and other financing associated fees during 2021.

For fiscal 2020, the Company had a net loss of $2,243,560, a significant increase from the prior year loss of $1,650,745. Consulting, management and professional fees in fiscal 2020 increased to $898,831 (2019 - $794,481), mainly due to the Company's higher general corporate activities during fiscal 2020. Employee benefits expense increased to $555,150 (2019 - $358,794) as a result of an increase in employees and their related costs at head office during 2020. Share-based payments also increased from $154,789 during fiscal 2019 to $289,665 during fiscal 2020. In addition, travel and promotion expenses increased to $240,320 in 2020 from $111,965 in fiscal 2019 as a result of increased promotional activities.

Results of Operations

For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company reported a net loss of $3,723,784 as compared to a net loss of $2,243,560 for the year ended December 31, 2020. Expenses capitalized to mineral properties are discussed under the "Exploration and Evaluation Expenditures" section below. Significant changes occurred during the year ended December 31, 2021 in the expense categories described below as compared to the year ended December 31, 2020:

Consulting, management and professional fees

Consulting, management and professional fees were $887,058 during the year ended December 31, 2021 as compared to $898,831 incurred during fiscal 2020. Consulting fees of $587,559 incurred during fiscal 2021 (compared to $586,973 during fiscal 2020), also included share-based compensation payments of $279,364 year ended December 31, 2021, compared to $135,876 for the year ended December 31, 2020. Management fees were mainly in relation to directors' fees of $69,724 incurred in fiscal 2021 compared to $68,291 in fiscal 2020. Professional fees, which were mainly legal fees and audit fees, amounted to $229,775 in fiscal 2021 compared to $243,567 during fiscal 2020.

Employee benefits

The Company's employee benefits expense increased to $1,097,977 for the year ended December 31, 2021 as compared to $555,150 incurred during the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase in costs was mainly due to an increase in employees and their related costs and bonus payments at head office during the fiscal 2021, compared to fiscal 2020. 


Office and sundry

For the year ended December 31, 2021, office and sundry expenses increased to $232,011 compared to $128,323 for the year ended December 31, 2020, mainly due to an increase in filing and other financing associated fees over the comparative period.

Share-based payments

Share-based payment expenses were $782,815 during the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to $289,665 incurred during the comparative year in 2020. The overall increase in 2021 in share-based payments was related to new stock options issued to employees, directors and officers of the Company in fiscal 2021

Impairment of exploration and evaluation assets

In accordance with IFRS 6, the Company assessed its exploration and evaluation assets for indications of impairment. As a result of the Company's decision not to renew the Devon and Navarro exploration permits, an impairment loss of $452,250 was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2021 (2020 - $nil). The Company also recorded $1 impairment on intangible assets (2020 - $nil).

Foreign exchange gain (loss)

The Company recorded a foreign exchange gain of $44,084 for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to a foreign exchange loss of $49,927 for fiscal 2020. This change was due to fluctuations in the value of the United States dollar relative to the Canadian dollar.

Interest and other income

The Company recognized other income of $168,354 for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to $100,084 for fiscal in 2020. This increase in 2021 was primarily due to the 2021 recognition of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries of $111,535 during the second quarter of 2021, corresponding to previous years' purchases. Interest and other income also included the sub-lease income of $52,668 (2020 - $53,623) being recorded on the right-of-use lease asset. As well, during fiscal of 2020, as a result of COVID-19, the Company qualified for an amount of $22,328 under the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy (CEWS) program, which was recorded as other income in the year end condensed consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss.

Summary of Quarterly Results

The following table sets out certain unaudited consolidated financial information of the Company for each of the last eight quarters, beginning with the fourth quarter of 2021. This financial information has been prepared using accounting policies consistent with International Accounting Standards ("IAS") 34 Interim Financial Reporting issued by the International Accounting Standards Board ("IASB"). The Company's presentation and functional currency is the United States dollar.


  2021 2021 2021 2021
  4th Quarter 3rd Quarter  2nd Quarter 1st Quarter
         
Net loss ($1,642,786) ($540,793) ($708,017) ($832,188)
Net loss per share  $          (0.01)  $          (0.00)  $          (0.01)  $          (0.01)
         
  2020 2020 2020 2020
  4th Quarter 3rd Quarter  2nd Quarter 1st Quarter
         
Net loss ($524,089) ($617,079) ($437,698) ($664,694)
Net loss per share   $          (0.00)  $          (0.01)  $          (0.00)  $          (0.01)

The Company's net loss for the fourth quarter of 2021 increased to $1,642,786 compared to the net loss of $540,793 incurred during the third quarter of 2021. The increase in the net loss was mainly impacted by an increase of $209,910 in consulting, management and professional fees; an increase $337,389 in share-based payment, an increase in foreign exchange gain of $10,225, as well as an increase of $80,997 in travel and promotions during the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to the third quarter of 2021. The Company also recorded an impairment charge of $452,251 on its Devon and Navarro properties and intangible assets during the fourth quarter of 2021. This was slightly offset by a decrease of $22,846 employee benefits in the fourth quarter. The third quarter 2021 net loss was also impacted by a reduction in interest and other income of $10,225 during the fourth quarter of 2021 compared to the third quarter of 2021.

The Company's net loss for the third quarter of 2021 decreased to $540,793 compared to the net loss of $708,017 incurred during the second quarter of 2021. The decrease in the net loss was mainly due to a decrease of $324,777 in share-based payments and a decrease of $41,987 in employee benefits. This was offset by an increase of $52,061 in consulting, management and professional fees, an increase in foreign exchange loss of $27,074, as well as an increase of $20,115 in travel and promotions during the third quarter of 2021 compared to the second quarter of 2021. The third quarter 2021 net loss was also impacted by a reduction in interest and other income of $112,907 during the third quarter of 2021 compared to the second quarter of 2021.

The Company's net loss for the second quarter of 2021 decreased to $708,017 compared to the net loss of $832,188 incurred during the first quarter of 2021. The decrease in the net loss was mainly due to a decrease of $200,219 in employee benefits, a decrease of $43,555 in office and sundry, and an increase in interest and other income of $112,590. This was offset by an increase of $215,364 in share-based payments, an increase of $21,630 in consulting, management and professional fees as well as an increase of $20,115 in travel and promotions during the second quarter of 2021 compared to the first quarter of 2021.

The Company's net loss for the first quarter of 2021 increased to $832,188 compared to the net loss of $524,089 incurred during the fourth quarter of 2020. The increase in the net loss was mainly due to an increase of $286,799 in employee benefits, an increase of $80,056 in share- based payments and an increase of $77,183 in office and sundry, offset by a decrease of $125,993 in consulting, management and professional fees as well as by a gain of $30,480 on derivative financial instruments during the first quarter of 2021 compared to the fourth quarter of 2020.

The Company's net loss for the fourth quarter of 2020 decreased to $524,089 compared to a net loss of $617,079 during the third quarter. The decrease in net loss was mainly due to a decrease of $33,124 in consulting, management and professional fees, a decrease of $61,866 in travel and promotion as well as a decrease of $23,122 in office and sundry expenses during the fourth quarter of 2020 compared to the third quarter of 2020.


The Company's net loss for the third quarter of 2020 increased to $617,079 compared to a net loss of $437,698 during the second quarter of 2020. The increase in loss was mainly due to an increase of $106,444 in consulting fees and an increase of $72,281 in shareholder information and promotion costs.

The Company's net loss for the second quarter of 2020 decreased to $437,698 compared to a net loss of $664,694 during the first quarter of 2020. The decrease in net loss was mainly due to a decrease of $109,174 in travel and promotion and $214,557 in share-based payments, which was offset by an increase of $67,669 in foreign exchange loss and the gain of $31,888 on derivative financial instruments during the during the first quarter of 2020 as compared to the second quarter of 2020.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company historically relies primarily on equity financings to fund its activities. Although the Company has been successful in completing equity financings in the past, there is no assurance that the Company will secure the necessary financings in the future. The volatility in the gold price has made it more difficult to secure equity financing for many exploration companies.

As at December 31, 2021, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $154,154 and working deficit of $1,178,733 compared to cash and cash equivalents of $256,624 and a working capital deficit of $1,086,420 as at December 31, 2020.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company incurred exploration expenditures of $9,075,945, (year ended December 31, 2020 - $7,138,915) of which $1,975,162 was funded by Barrick for the year ended December 31, 2021, under the then joint venture between Barrick and the Company (year ended December 31, 2020 - $4,267,816 respectively). A breakdown of the exploration expenditures is presented below under "Exploration and Evaluation Expenditures".

See the discussion under "General" above with respect to the private placement financings completed by the Company during fiscal 2021 and in February 2022.

During fiscal 2021, stock options to purchase 1,125,000 common shares of the Company were exercised for total gross proceeds of $141,249 (Cdn$178,500). During fiscal 2021, warrants to purchase 2,400,000 common shares of the Company were exercised for total gross proceeds of $1,418,198 (Cdn$1,800,000) 

As the Company's business is the exploration of mineral properties, the Company has to operate with limited financial resources and control costs to ensure that funds are available to fund its operations. As is typical for an exploration company, the Company will need to raise additional funds to continue its activities. The Company expects to raise such additional funds through offerings of its shares. However, if the Company raises additional funds by issuing additional shares, the ownership percentages of existing shareholders will be reduced and the securities that the Company may issue in the future may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of the current holders of the Company's common shares. Such securities may also be issued at a discount to the market price of the Company's common shares, resulting in possible further dilution to the book value per share of common shares. If the Company is unable to raise sufficient funds through equity offerings, it may need to sell an interest in its properties. There can be no assurance the Company would be successful in selling any such interest.


Contractual Obligations

The Company's contractual obligations as at December 31, 2021 are described in the following table:

Contractual obligations  Total Payments due
in less than 1
year
Payments due
in 1 to 3 years
       
Lease  $           138,684  $          138,684  $                       -
Loans  $             27,602  $                      -  $             27,602
       
Total  $           166,286  $          138,684  $             27,602

Exploration and Evaluation Expenditures

The following tables provide breakdowns of exploration and evaluation expenditures incurred during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively:

    North Kivu Project     Ngayu Projects     Imbo Project     Total  
Balance 12/31/2020 $ 10,771,366   $ 17,918,921   $ 2,932,905   $ 31,623,192  
                         
Field camps   -     -     734,006     734,006  
Geochemestry   -     19,316     245,486     264,802  
Geology   -     437,145     1,666,908     2,104,053  
Drilling   -     452,158     1,830,945     2,283,103  
Feasibility studies   -     -     282,051     282,051  
Helicopter   -     -     147,000     147,000  
Travel   -     126,063     87,918     213,981  
Professional fees   -     151,467     376,409     527,876  
Office and sundry   -     501,761     299,649     801,410  
Interest and bank charges   -     3,548     40,975     44,523  
Salaries   -     508,512     418,803     927,315  
Amortization   -     843     27,602     28,445  
Impairment charges   -     (452,250 )   -     -  
Other   -     15,225     702,154     717,379  
Expenditures for the period   -     1,763,788     6,859,907     8,623,695  
Funding from Barrick   -     (1,975,162 )   -     (1,975,162 )
Balance 12/31/2021 $ 10,771,366   $ 17,707,547   $ 9,792,812   $ 38,271,725  

 


    North Kivu Project     Ngayu Projects     Imbo Project     Total  
Balance 12/31/2019 $ 10,590,729   $ 17,907,081   $ 254,283   $ 28,752,093  
                         
Mineral properties   -     -     140,000     140,000  
Field camps   -     -     404,238     404,238  
Geophysics   -     29,897     -     29,897  
Geochemistry   -     63,533     76,404     139,937  
Geology   -     570,047     720,671     1,290,718  
Drilling   -     910,993     424,770     1,335,763  
Helicopter   -     132,618     -     132,618  
Travel   200     632,849     41,394     674,443  
Professional fees   170,568     76,686     194,935     442,189  
Office and sundry   9,000     684,114     127,046     820,160  
Interest and bank charges   -     5,543     22,706     28,249  
Salaries   -     1,057,311     159,134     1,216,445  
Amortization   869     -     15,902     16,771  
Other   -     116,065     351,421     467,486  
Expenditures for the period   180,637     4,279,656     2,678,622     7,138,915  
Funding from Barrick   -     (4,267,816 )   -     (4,267,816 )
Balance 12/31/2020 $ 10,771,366   $ 17,918,921   $ 2,932,905   $ 31,623,192  

Outstanding Share Data

The authorized share capital of the Company consists of an unlimited number of common shares and an unlimited number of preference shares, issuable in series. As at March 31, 2022 the Company had outstanding 140,824,174 common shares, 10,476,000 stock options to purchase common shares and 7,301,981 common share purchase warrants.

Related Party Transactions

a) Key Management Personnel

Key management includes directors (executive and non-executive), the Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"), the Chief Financial Officer, and senior executives reporting directly to the CEO. The remuneration of the key management of the Company as defined above, during years ended December 31, 2021, December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 was as follows:

b) Other Related Parties

As at December 31, 2021, an amount of $67,477 relating to advances provided by the Company was due from Mr. Kondrat, the Executive Chairman and a director of the Company (December 31, 2020 the amount due to Mr. Kondrat - $279,154 related to salary and advances to the Company). Total amounts paid to Mr. Kondrat for the year ended December 31, 2021 were $500,000 (December 31, 2020 - $242,497).


As at December 31, 2021, an amount of $216,148 was due from Gentor Resources Inc. (a company with common directors) related to common expenses (December 31, 2020 - $26,474).

As at December 31, 2021, an amount of $68,926 was due from KGL Resources Ltd. (a company with a common officer) related to common expenses (December 31, 2020 - $5,766 was due to KGL Resources Ltd.).

The amounts included in due to or from related party are unsecured, non-interest bearing and are payable on demand.

New Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted

IAS 1 - Presentation of Financial Statements

On January 23, 2020, the IASB issued an amendment to IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements providing a more general approach to the classification of liabilities. The amendment clarifies that the classification of liabilities as current or noncurrent depends on the rights existing at the end of the reporting period as opposed to the expectations of exercising the right for settlement of the liability. The amendments further clarify that settlement refers to the transfer of cash, equity instruments, other assets, or services to the counterparty. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2023 and are to be applied retrospectively, with early adoption permitted. The Company is assessing the financial impact of the amendment on its consolidated financial statements.

IAS 16 - Property, Plant and Equipment

On May 14, 2020, the IASB issued an amendment to IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment to prohibit deducting from the cost of an item of property, plant and equipment, any proceeds from selling items produced while bringing the asset to the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management. The proceeds from selling such items, and the cost of producing those items are to be recognized in profit and loss. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2022 with early adoption permitted. The amendment is to be applied retrospectively only to items of property, plant and equipment that are brought to the location and condition necessary for them to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management on or after the earliest period presented in the financial statements in the year in which the amendments are first applied. The Company is assessing the financial impact of the amendment on its consolidated financial statements.

IAS 37 - Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets

On May 14, 2020, the IASB issued an amendment to IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets to specify which costs an entity includes in determining the cost of fulfilling a contract for the purpose of assessing whether the contract is onerous. The amendment specifies that the cost of fulfilling a contract comprises the costs that relate directly to the contract. Costs that relate directly to the contract can either be incremental costs of fulfilling the contract or an allocation of other costs that relate directly to fulfilling contracts. The amendments are effective for contracts for which the Company has not yet fulfilled all its obligations on or after January 1, 2022 with early adoption permitted. The Company is assessing the financial impact of the amendment on its consolidated financial statements.


IFRS 9 - Financial Instruments

On May 14, 2020, the IASB issued an amendment to IFRS 9 Financial Instruments clarifying which fees to include in the test in assessing whether to derecognize a financial liability. Only those fees paid or received between the borrower and the lender, including fees paid or received by either the entity or the lender on the other's behalf are included. The amendment is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2022 with early adoption permitted. The Company is assessing the financial impact of the amendment on its consolidated financial statements.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The preparation of the Company's consolidated financial statements in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates. Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Information about critical judgments in applying accounting policies and estimates that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements included the following:

Estimates:

Impairment

Assets, including property, plant and equipment and exploration and evaluation assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts exceed their recoverable amounts. The assessment of the fair value often requires estimates and assumptions such as discount rates, exchange rates, commodity prices, rehabilitation and restoration costs, future capital requirements and future operating performance. Changes in such estimates could impact recoverable values of these assets.  Estimates are reviewed regularly by management.

Share-based payment transactions

The Company measures the cost of equity-settled transactions with employees by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments at the date at which they are granted. Estimating fair value for share-based payment transactions requires determining the most appropriate valuation model, which is dependent on the terms and conditions of the grant. This estimate also requires determining the most appropriate inputs to the valuation model including the expected life of the stock option, volatility and dividend yield and making assumptions about them. See Note 15 of the Annual Financial Statements.

For warrant-based derivative financial instruments, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate fair value of the derivative instruments. The assumptions and models used for estimating fair value of warrant-based derivative financial instruments are disclosed in Note 14(c) of the Annual Financial Statements.


Judgments:

Provisions and contingencies

The amount recognized as provision, including legal, contractual and other exposures or obligations, is the best estimate of the consideration required to settle the related liability, including any related interest charges, taking into account the risks and uncertainties surrounding the obligation. In addition, contingencies will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. Therefore, assessment of contingencies inherently involves the exercise of significant judgment and estimates of the outcome of future events. The Company assesses its liabilities and contingencies based upon the best information available, relevant tax laws and other appropriate requirements.

Title to mineral property interests

Although the Company has taken steps to verify title to mineral properties in which it has an interest, these procedures do not guarantee the Company's title. Such properties may be subject to prior agreements or transfers and title may be affected by undetected defects.

Exploration and evaluation expenditure

The application of the Company's accounting policy for exploration and evaluation expenditure requires significant judgment in determining whether it is likely that future economic benefits will flow to the Company, which may be based on assumptions about future events or circumstances. Estimates and assumptions made may change if new information becomes available. There are key circumstances that would indicate a test for impairment is required, which include: the expiry of the right to explore, substantive expenditure on further exploration is not planned, exploration for and evaluation of the mineral resources in the area have not led to discovery of commercially viable quantities, and/or sufficient data exists to show that the carrying amount of the asset is unlikely to be recovered in full from successful development or by sale. If information becomes available suggesting impairment, the amount capitalized is written off in the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss during the period the new information becomes available.

Significant judgements have been made with regards to the potential for indicators of impairment. This includes judgements related to the ability to carry out the desired exploration activities as a result of various permits currently being under force majeure due to the poor security situation at the North Kivu property and the need to allocate resources amongst different projects based on the availability of capital and funding. 

Functional and presentation currency

Judgment is required to determine the functional currency of the Company and its subsidiaries. These judgments are continuously evaluated and are based on management's experience and knowledge of the relevant facts and circumstances.


Financial Risk Management

Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities

The consolidated statements of financial position carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents, advances receivable and prepaid expenses, balances due to/from related parties, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and the employee retention allowance approximate fair value due to their short-term nature. Due to the use of subjective judgments and uncertainties in the determination of fair values these values should not be interpreted as being realizable in an immediate settlement of the financial instruments.

Fair value hierarchy

The following provides an analysis of financial instruments that are measured subsequent to initial recognition at fair value, grouped into Levels 1 to 3 based on the degree to which the fair value is observable:

There were no transfers between Level 1, 2 and 3 during the reporting period. Cash and cash equivalents are ranked Level 1 as the market value is readily observable. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value, as maturities are less than three months.

Foreign Currency Risk

Foreign exchange risk is the risk that a variation in exchange rates between the United States dollar and Canadian dollar or other foreign currencies will affect the Company's operations and financial results.  A portion of the Company's transactions is denominated in Canadian dollars.  Significant foreign exchange gains or losses are reflected as a separate component of the consolidated statement of loss and comprehensive loss. The Company does not use derivatives instruments to reduce its exposure to foreign currency risk. See Note 17(c) of the Annual Financial Statements for additional details. 

Credit Risk


Financial instruments which are potentially subject to credit risk for the Company consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and advances receivable and prepaid expenses. Cash and cash equivalents are maintained with several financial institutions of reputable credit and may be redeemed upon demand.  It is therefore the Company's opinion that such credit risk is subject to normal industry risks and is considered minimal.  See Note 17(d) of the Annual Financial Statements for additional details. 


Liquidity Risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they become due. The Company attempts to ensure that there is sufficient cash to meet its liabilities when they are due and manages this risk by regularly evaluating its liquid financial resources to fund current and long-term obligations and to meet its capital commitments in a cost-effective manner.  If future cash flows are fairly uncertain, the liquidity risk increases. The Company's liquidity requirements are met through a variety of sources, including cash and cash equivalents, and equity capital markets.

Mineral Property Risk

The Company's operations in the DRC are exposed to various levels of political risk and uncertainties, including political and economic instability, government regulations relating to exploration and mining, military repression and civil disorder, all or any of which may have a material adverse impact on the Company's activities or may result in impairment or loss of part or all of the Company's assets.

Risks and Uncertainties

The Company is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could significantly impact its operations and future prospects. The following discussion pertains to certain principal risks and uncertainties but is not, by its nature, all inclusive.

In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus ("COVID-19") emerged in Wuhan, China. Since then, it has spread worldwide and infections have been reported around the world. Canada confirmed its first case of COVID-19 on January 25, 2020 and its first death related to COVID-19 on March 9, 2020. On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of COVID-19 a global pandemic. In response to the outbreak, governmental authorities in Canada and internationally have introduced various recommendations and measures to try to limit the pandemic, including travel restrictions, border closures, non-essential business closures, quarantines, self-isolations, shelters-in-place and social distancing. The COVID-19 outbreak and the response of governmental authorities to try to limit it are having a significant impact on the private sector and individuals, including unprecedented business, employment and economic disruptions. The continued spread of COVID-19 nationally and globally could have an adverse impact on the Company's business, operations and financial results, as well as result in a further deterioration of general economic conditions including a possible national or global recession. Due to the speed with which the COVID-19 situation has developed and is developing and the uncertainty of its magnitude, outcome and duration, it is not possible to estimate its impact on the Company's business, operations or financial results; however, the impact could be material.

All of the Company's projects are located in the DRC. The assets and operations of the Company are therefore subject to various political, economic and other uncertainties, including, among other things, the risks of war and civil unrest, hostage taking, military repression, labor unrest, illegal mining, expropriation, nationalization, renegotiation or nullification of existing licenses, permits, approvals and contracts, taxation policies, foreign exchange and repatriation restrictions, changing political conditions, international monetary fluctuations, currency controls and foreign governmental regulations that favor or require the awarding of contracts to local contractors or require foreign contractors to employ citizens of, or purchase supplies from, a particular jurisdiction. Changes, if any, in mining or investment policies or shifts in political attitude in the DRC may adversely affect the Company's operations. Operations may be affected in varying degrees by government regulations with respect to, but not limited to, restrictions on production, price controls, export controls, currency remittance, income taxes, foreign investment, maintenance of claims, environmental legislation, land use, land claims of local people, water use and mine safety. Failure to comply strictly with applicable laws, regulations and local practices relating to mineral rights could result in loss, reduction or expropriation of entitlements. In addition, in the event of a dispute arising from operations in the DRC, the Company may be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of foreign courts or may not be successful in subjecting foreign persons to the jurisdiction of courts in Canada. The Company also may be hindered or prevented from enforcing its rights with respect to a governmental instrumentality because of the doctrine of sovereign immunity. It is not possible for the Company to accurately predict such developments or changes in laws or policy or to what extent any such developments or changes may have a material adverse effect on the Company's operations.


The DRC is a developing nation emerging from a period of civil war and conflict. Physical and institutional infrastructure throughout the DRC is in a debilitated condition. The DRC is in transition from a largely state controlled economy to one based on free market principles, and from a non-democratic political system with a centralized ethnic power base, to one based on more democratic principles. There can be no assurance that these changes will be affected or that the achievement of these objectives will not have material adverse consequences for the Company and its operations. The DRC continues to experience instability in parts of the country due to certain militia and criminal elements. While the government and United Nations forces are working to support the extension of central government authority throughout the country, there can be no assurance that such efforts will be successful.   

The only sources of future funds for further exploration programs which are presently available to the Company are the sale of equity capital, or the offering by the Company of an interest in its properties to be earned by another party carrying out further exploration. There is no assurance that such sources of financing will be available on acceptable terms, if at all. In the event that commercial quantities of minerals are found on the Company's properties, the Company does not have the financial resources at this time to bring a mine into production.

All of the Company's properties are in the exploration stage only and none of the properties contain a known body of commercial ore. The Company currently operates at a loss and does not generate any revenue from its mineral properties. The exploration and development of mineral deposits involve significant financial risks over a significant period of time, which even a combination of careful evaluation, experience and knowledge may not eliminate. Few properties which are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. Major expenditures may be required to establish reserves by drilling and to construct mining and processing facilities at a site. It is impossible to ensure that the Company's exploration programs will result in a profitable commercial mining operation. 

The Company's mineral resources are estimates and no assurances can be given that the indicated levels of gold will be produced.  Such estimates are expressions of judgment based on knowledge, mining experience, analysis of drilling results and industry practices. Valid estimates made at a given time may significantly change when new information becomes available. While the Company believes that its resource estimates are well established, by their nature resource estimates are imprecise and depend, to a certain extent, upon statistical inferences, which may ultimately prove unreliable. If such estimates are inaccurate or are reduced in the future, this could have a material adverse impact on the Company. In addition, there can be no assurance that gold recoveries or other metal recoveries in small-scale laboratory tests will be duplicated in larger scale tests under on-site conditions or during production. 


The Company's exploration and, if such exploration is successful, development of its properties is subject to all of the hazards and risks normally incident to mineral exploration and development, any of which could result in damage to life or property, environmental damage and possible legal liability for any or all damage. 

The price of gold has fluctuated widely. The future direction of the price of gold will depend on numerous factors beyond the Company's control including international, economic and political trends, expectations of inflation, currency exchange fluctuations, interest rates, global or regional consumption patterns, speculative activities and increased production due to new extraction developments and improved extraction and production methods. The effect of these factors on the price of gold, and therefore on the economic viability of the Company's properties, cannot accurately be predicted. As the Company is only at the exploration stage, it is not yet possible for the Company to adopt specific strategies for controlling the impact of fluctuations in the price of gold. 

The Company uses the United States dollar as its functional currency. Fluctuations in the value of the United States dollar relative to the Canadian dollar could have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements by creating gains or losses. The Company recorded a foreign exchange gain of $44,084 during the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to a foreign exchange loss of $49,927 during the year ended December 31, 2020, due to the variation in the value of the United States dollar relative to the Canadian dollar. No currency hedge policies are in place or are presently contemplated.

The natural resource industry is intensely competitive in all of its phases, and the Company competes with many companies possessing greater financial resources and technical facilities than itself. 

Reference is made to the Company's annual information form dated March 31, 2022 for additional risk factor disclosure (a copy of such document can be obtained from SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov). 

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls over disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers' Annual and Interim Filings of the Canadian Securities Administrators and Rules 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) under the United States Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that all relevant information is gathered and reported to senior management, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, on a timely basis so that appropriate decisions can be made regarding public disclosure. As at December 31, 2021, management of the Company, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as required by Canadian securities laws. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2021, the disclosure controls and procedures were adequately designed and effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the Company it files or submits under Canadian securities laws is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by those laws and that material information is accumulated and communicated to management of the Company, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.


Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Internal controls have been designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of the Company's financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with IFRS. As at December 31, 2021, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer evaluated or caused to be evaluated under their supervision the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control - Integrated Framework of 2013. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2021, the Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of the Company's financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with IFRS.

The Company is required under Canadian securities laws to disclose herein any change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent period that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting. There were no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting during the year ended December 31, 2021, that management believes have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

It should be noted that a control system, including the Company's disclosure controls and procedures system and internal control over financial reporting system, no matter how well conceived can provide only reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the objective of the control system will be met and it should not be expected that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures system and internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all reporting deficiencies whether caused by either error or fraud.

 



CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON

In connection with the Loncor Gold Inc. Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2021 and any amendments or supplements and/or exhibits thereto (collectively, the "Form 20-F"), the undersigned consents to:

(i)  the filing and use of the technical report summary dated November 17, 2021 and titled "Technical Report Summary on the Mineral Resources of the Imbo Project in the Democratic Republic of the Congo" (the "TRS"), as an exhibit to and referenced in the Form 20-F;

(ii)  the use of and references to my name, including my status as an expert or "qualified person" (as defined in Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission), in connection with the TRS and Form 20-F; and

(iii)  any extracts or summaries of the TRS included or incorporated by reference in the Form 20-F, and the use of any information derived, summarized, quoted or referenced from the TRS, or portions thereof, that was prepared by my, that I supervised the preparation of, and/or that was reviewed and approved by me, that is included or incorporated by reference in the Form 20-F.

 

Dated: April 29, 2022.

 

(signed) "Daniel Bansah"
__________________________________________
Daniel Bansah
MSc (MinEx), MAusIMM (CP), FWAIMM, MGhIG
Chairman and Managing Director
Minecon Resources and Services Limited



CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON

In connection with the Loncor Gold Inc. Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2021 and any amendments or supplements and/or exhibits thereto (collectively, the "Form 20-F"), the undersigned consents to:

(i)  the filing and use of the technical report summary dated November 17, 2021 and titled "Technical Report Summary on the Mineral Resources of the Imbo Project in the Democratic Republic of the Congo" (the "TRS"), as an exhibit to and referenced in the Form 20-F;

(ii)  the use of and references to my name, including my status as an expert or "qualified person" (as defined in Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission), in connection with the TRS and Form 20-F; and

(iii)  any extracts or summaries of the TRS included or incorporated by reference in the Form 20-F, and the use of any information derived, summarized, quoted or referenced from the TRS, or portions thereof, that was prepared by my, that I supervised the preparation of, and/or that was reviewed and approved by me, that is included or incorporated by reference in the Form 20-F.

 

Dated: April 29, 2022.

 

(signed) "Christian Bawah"
____________________________________________
Christian Bawah
BSc (Hons) Geology, MBA (Finance), MAusIMM (CP), MMCC, FWAIMM, MGhIG
Director, Geology and Mineral Exploration
Minecon Resources and Services Limited



 


CAUTIONARY NOTES

This report contains forward-looking information which addresses activities, events or developments that are believed, expected or anticipated will or may occur in the future (including, without limitation, statements regarding upside potential at Adumbi, mineral resource estimates, potential underground mineral resources, potential mineralisation, potential gold discoveries, drill targets, potential mineral resource increases, estimated exploration costs, exploration results, and future exploration and development plans) are forward-looking information. This forward-looking information reflects current expectations or beliefs based on information currently available and is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that may cause the actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking information. Even if such actual results are realised or substantially realised, there can be no assurance that they will have the expected consequences to, or effects. Factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from current expectations include, among other things, the possibility that future exploration (including drilling) or development results will not be consistent with the expectations of Loncor Gold Inc. ("Loncor" or the "Company"), the possibility that drilling or development programmes will be delayed, activities of the Company may be adversely impacted by the continued spread of the widespread outbreak of respiratory illness caused by a novel strain of the coronavirus (COVID-19), including the ability of the Company to secure additional financing, risks related to the exploration stage of the Company's properties, uncertainties relating to the availability and costs of financing needed in the future, failure to establish estimated mineral resources (the Company's mineral resource figures are estimates and no assurances can be given that the indicated levels of gold will be produced), changes in world gold markets or equity markets, political developments in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, gold recoveries being less than those indicated by the metallurgical test work carried out to date (there can be no assurance that gold recoveries in small-scale laboratory tests will be duplicated in large tests under on-site conditions or during production), fluctuations in currency exchange rates, inflation, changes to regulations affecting the Company's activities, delays in obtaining or failure to obtain required project approvals, the uncertainties involved in interpreting drilling results and other geological data and the other risks disclosed under the heading "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in the Company's annual report on Form 20-F dated April 29, 2022,  filed on EDGAR at www.sec.gov. Forward-looking information speaks only as of the date on which it is provided and, except as may be required by applicable securities laws, any intent or obligation to update any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or results or otherwise, is hereby disclaimed. Although the Company believes that the assumptions inherent in the forward-looking information are reasonable, forward-looking information is not a guarantee of future performance and accordingly undue reliance should not be put on such information due to the inherent uncertainty therein.

The mineral resource figures referred to in this report are estimates and no assurances can be given that the indicated levels of gold will be produced. Such estimates are expressions of judgment based on knowledge, mining experience, analysis of drilling results and industry practices. Valid estimates made at a given time may significantly change when new information becomes available. While it is believed that the mineral resource estimates included in this report are well established, by their nature mineral resource estimates are imprecise and depend, to a certain extent, upon statistical inferences which may ultimately prove unreliable. If such estimates are inaccurate or are reduced in the future, this could have a material adverse impact on the Company.

 


Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that mineral resources can be upgraded to mineral reserves through continued exploration.

Due to the uncertainty that may be attached to inferred mineral resources, it cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will be upgraded to an indicated or measured mineral resource as a result of continued exploration. Confidence in the estimate is insufficient to allow meaningful application of the technical and economic parameters to enable an evaluation of economic viability worthy of public disclosure (except in certain limited circumstances). Inferred mineral resources are excluded from estimates forming the basis of a feasibility study.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAUTIONARY NOTES 3
LIST OF UNITS 47
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 49
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 56
1.1 Introduction 56
1.2 Property Description and Location 56
1.3 Mineral Rights and Land Ownership 57
1.4 Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Physiography and Infrastructure 57
1.5 Exploration History 58
1.6 Geological Setting and Gold Mineralisation 59
1.7 Deposit Types 60
1.8 Exploration 61
1.9 Drilling 61
1.10 Sample Preparation, Analyses and Security 62
1.11 Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing 62
1.12 Mineral Resources 63
1.13 Mineral Inventory 66
1.14 Adjacent Properties 66
1.15 Interpretation and Conclusions 67
1.15.1 Introduction 67
1.15.2 Geology and Mineralisation 67
1.15.3 Exploration, Drilling and Analytical Data Collection in Support of Mineral Resource Estimation 68
1.15.4 Mineral Resource Methodology and Estimation 68
1.15.5 Open-Pit Optimisation and Mineral Inventory 68
1.16 Recommendations 68
2 INTRODUCTION 70
2.1 Qualifications of Qualified Persons 70
2.2 Terms of Reference and Purpose 71
2.3 Sources of Information 72
2.4 Scope of the Opinion 72
2.5 Qualified persons Declaration and Statement of Independence 72
2.6 Personal Inspection 73
3 RELIANCE ON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY LONCOR 73
4 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 75
4.1 Location 76
4.2 Property Ownership 79
4.3 Land Tenure 79
4.4 Imbo Exploitation Permit 79
4.5 Permits 81
4.6 Environmental Liabilities and Permitting 81
4.7 Surface Usage/Land Lease 81
5 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY 82
5.1 Accessibility 82


5.2 Climate 83
5.3 Local Resources 83
5.4 Physiography 85
6 HISTORY 86
6.1 Prior Ownership 86
6.2 Exploration History 86
6.3 Development and Production History 88
6.4 Historical Resource Estimates 89
7 GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND MINERALISATION 94
7.1 Regional Geology 94
7.2 Local Geology 96
7.3 Property Geology 98
7.3.1 Adumbi 98
7.3.2 Kitenge 102
7.3.3 Manzako 104
7.4 Mineralisation 105
7.4.1 2020 to 2021 Drill Assay Results 107
7.4.2 Relationship Between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold Grades 110
7.4.3 Range of Classifications 126
7.4.4 Visible Gold (VG) 126
7.5 Structures 128
7.5.1 Imbo Project Structural Data Analysis 128
7.5.2 Structural Interpretation from 2020 to 2021 Drilling Programme at Adumbi 139
8 DEPOSIT TYPES 143
9 EXPLORATION 144
9.1 Summary of Pre-2014 Exploration 144
9.1.1 Soil Sampling 144
9.1.2 Geological Mapping 145
9.1.3 Trenching 145
9.1.4 Underground Exploration 146
9.1.5 Airborne Geophysical Survey 146
9.2 Post-2014 to 2020 Exploration 147
9.2.1 Soil Sampling 147
9.2.2 Regional BLEG Survey 147
9.2.3 Geological Mapping 154
9.2.4 Trenching 156
9.2.5 Pitting 157
9.2.6 Topographical Survey 158
9.2.7 Underground Exploration 162
9.2.8 Airborne Geophysics Survey 162
9.2.9 Induced Polarisation (IP) Surveys 162
9.2.10 Gradient Array Data 166
9.2.11 LiDAR Survey 172
9.2.12 Relative Density (RD) Measurements 173
9.3 2020 To 2021 Exploration 178
10 DRILLING 181


10.1 Pre-2014 Drilling 181
10.1.1 Collar Surveys 186
10.1.2 Drillhole Downhole Survey 186
10.1.3 Drillhole Database 187
10.2 2014 to 2017 Drilling 187
10.2.1 Planning 187
10.2.2 Drilling 189
10.2.3 Core Logging 189
10.2.4 Sampling and Assaying 189
10.2.5 Core Re-Logging of All Core 190
10.2.6 Analytical Results 191
10.3 2020 to 2021 Drilling 193
10.3.1 Drillhole Nomenclature 194
10.3.2 Downhole Survey 194
10.3.3 Core Orientation and Structural measurements 195
10.3.4 Rig Monitoring, Core Recovery and RQD Measurements 196
10.3.5 Drillhole Collar Survey 197
10.3.6 Core Logging 199
10.3.7 Core Photography 218
10.3.8 Geotechnical Logging 219
10.3.9 Core Cutting and Sampling 222
10.4 2020 to 2021 Drilling - Mambo Bado 223
11 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY 227
11.1 Sample Preparation and Analyses 227
11.1.1 Sample Preparation Procedure 227
11.1.2 Sample Analysis 229
11.1.3 BLEG Samples 229
11.1.4 Stream Sediments 229
11.2 Quality Assurance and Quality Control 229
11.2.1 QA/QC Programme 230
11.2.2 Accepting or Rejecting Assay Data using Standard Results 232
11.2.3 Blanks 233
11.3 2014 to 2017 QA/QC ProgramME 235
11.3.1 Adumbi Deposit Standards Performance 240
11.3.2 Blanks 246
11.3.3 Duplicates 248
11.3.4 Inter-Laboratory Checks 249
11.3.5 Review of External Laboratory Internal QA/QC Programme 249
11.4 Security OF SAMPLES 250
11.5 2020 to 2021 QA/QC Programme 250
11.5.1 Adumbi Deposit Standards Performance 255
11.5.2 Blanks 259
11.5.3 Duplicates 262
11.5.4 Inter-Laboratory Checks 263
11.5.5 Sample Preparation Laboratory External Independent Audit 264
11.5.6 Review of External Laboratory Internal QA/QC Programme 265
11.6 Recommendations 265


12 DATA VERIFICATION 266
12.1 Site Visit 266
12.2 DrillHole, Trench and Adit Data 267
12.3 Independent Audit and Witness Sampling 268
12.4 Discussion 268
12.5 Recommendations 268
13 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING 270
13.1 Introduction 270
13.2 Summary 270
14 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES 275
14.1 Approach 275
14.2 Resource Database 276
14.3 Bulk Density 280
14.4 Wireframe and 3D Modelling 280
14.4.1 Geological Wireframe and Modelling 280
14.4.2 Digital Terrain Model 284
14.4.3 Redox Surfaces and Modelling 284
14.5 Assay Capping 284
14.6 Assay Interval Compositing 288
14.7 Mineralisation Continuity and Variography 290
14.8 Block Models 292
14.9 Interpolation Search Parameters and Grade Interpolation 292
14.10 Historical and Artisanal Mining Depletion 293
14.11 Resource Classification 294
14.12 Cut-off Grade Parameters 295
14.13 Model Validation 299
14.14 Mineral Resource Reporting 304
14.15 Discussion 306
14.16 Recommendations for Further Work 307
15 MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATES 309
16 ADJACENT PROPERTIES 317
16.1 Ngayu Belt Exploration (2010 to 2016) 317
16.2 Ngayu Exploration (2016 to 2021) 319
17 OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION 322
17.1 DRC Political and Economic Climate 322
17.2 DRC Community and Social Aspects 323
17.3 Status of the DRC Minerals Industry 324
17.4 DRC Minerals Industry Policies 325
17.4.1 Available Mining Rights 325
17.4.2 Royalties and Taxes 325
17.4.3 Contracting Requirements 326
17.4.4 Other Notable Amendments 326
17.5 DRC Political Risk 326
18 INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS 328
18.1 Introduction 328
18.2 Geology and Mineralisation 328


18.3 Exploration, Drilling and Analytical Data Collection in Support of Mineral Resource Estimation 328
18.4 Mineral Resource Methodology and Estimation 328
18.5 Metallurgical Test Work 329
18.6 Open-Pit Optimisation and Mineral Inventory 329
18.7 Possible Risks and Uncertainties to the Future Development of Adumbi 329
19 RECOMMENDATIONS 330
20 REFERENCES 333
DATE AND SIGNATURE PAGE 336
CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON - DANIEL BANSAH 337
CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON - CHRISTIAN BAWAH 339

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1.1: Adumbi Metallurgical Test Work Results 31
Table 1.2: Flotation Results 32
Table 1.3: Adumbi Deposit Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources (Effective Date: November 17, 2021) 33
Table 1.4: Adumbi Mineral Resources by Material Type (Effective Date: November 17, 2021) 33
Table 2.1: Summary of the Qualifications and Responsibilities of the QPs 39
Table 4.1: Coordinates of the Imbo Exploitation Permit (PE9691) 46
Table 6.1: Summary of Imbo Project Historical Alluvial Gold Production (1927 to 1951) 55
Table 6.2: Summary of Kitenge-Maiepunji Mines Historical Gold Production (1938 to 1955) 56
Table 6.3: Summary of Adumbi Mine Historical Gold Production (1952 to 1959) 56
Table 6.4: Adumbi Historical Mineral Resources (1988) 57
Table 6.5: Adumbi Historical Mineral Resources (April 2012) 57
Table 6.6: Mineral Resource Estimate of Adumbi, Kitenge and Manzako Deposits (Effective Date: December 31, 2013) 58
Table 6.7: Inferred Mineral Resource of the Adumbi Deposit (Effective Date: April 17, 2020) 58
Table 6.8: Inferred Mineral Resources for the Imbo Project (Effective Date: April 17, 2020) 58
Table 6.9: Adumbi Deposit Inferred Mineral Resource by Material Type (Effective Date: April 27, 2021) 59
Table 6.10: Inferred Mineral Resource for the Imbo Project (Effective Date: April 27, 2021) 59
Table 7.1: Significant Mineralised Intercepts from Completed Drillholes. 74
Table 7.2: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold Grades in LADD001 77
Table 7.3: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold Grades in LADD003 79
Table 7.4: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold Grades in LADD004 81
Table 7.5: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold Grades in LADD006 82
Table 7.6: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold Grades in LADD007 85
Table 7.7: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold Grades in LADD008 87
Table 7.8: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold Grades in LADD009 88
Table 7.9: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold Grades in LADD012 90
Table 7.10: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold Grades in LADD013 91


Table 7.11: Range of Classification of Sulphides, Silicification and Gold Grades 93
Table 9.1: Summary of Soil Sampling by Kilo on the Imbo Project 111
Table 9.2: Summary of Significant Trench Intercepts at Adumbi, Kitenge and Manzako 112
Table 9.3: Significant Underground Sample Results at Adumbi 113
Table 9.4: Summary of Sample Types and Analytical Methods, Phases 1 and 2 118
Table 9.5: Association of Elements in the Phase 1 and 2 BLEG Survey Areas 120
Table 9.6: Summary of Mapping and Pitting Programmes in the Adumbi and Adumbi West Areas 122
Table 9.7: Adumbi Prospect Survey Control Points 125
Table 9.8: LiDAR Classification Values 140
Table 9.9: Summary of all RD Measurements on Adumbi Core 142
Table 9.10: Summary of RD Measurements in Mineralised and Unmineralised Rock 142
Table 9.11: Average RDs for the Different Lithologies at Adumbi 144
Table 9.12: Average RD Measurements for Mineralised Zones 1, 2, 3 and 4  (RP Zone not yet separated) 145
Table 9.13: Summary of Previous and Reviewed Mineralised Average RD Measurements 145
Table 9.14: Summary of Imbo East Exploration Statistics (2020 to 2021) 146
Table 10.1: 2010 to 2013 Drill Programme Summary of Imbo Project 148
Table 10.2: Significant Drill Intercepts from the Adumbi Deposit 149
Table 10.3: Significant Drill Intercepts from the Kitenge Deposit 151
Table 10.4: Significant Drill Intercepts from the Manzako Deposit 152
Table 10.5: Summary of Significant Drill Intercepts from the 2017 Adumbi Deep Hole Drilling 159
Table 10.6: Initial Planned Adumbi Diamond Drillholes with Sequence of Drilling 160
Table 10.7: Adumbi Deposit Survey Control Coordinate Points in UTM 164
Table 10.8: Drill Collars of Adumbi Completed Boreholes 166
Table 10.9: Summary of the Lithological Units Intercepted within the Mineralised Package of LADD025 and Composition of the Alteration Mineral Assemblage 175
Table 10.10: Summary of Geotechnical Log of Drillhole LADD001 along Depth 187
Table 10.11: Hardness of Lithological Units 187
Table 10.12: RMR Report for LADD001 188
Table 10.13: Mambo Bado Planned Drillholes 192
Table 10.14: Drill Collars of Mambo Bado Completed Boreholes 193
Table 10.15: Significant Mineralised Intercepts from Drillhole LBDD002 193
Table 11.1: Summary of RPA 2014 QA/QC Review of the Database 197
Table 11.2: Summary of Drill Core Samples, Standards and Blanks Submitted for Assay from the Adumbi, Kitenge and Manzako Deposits 198
Table 11.3: Standards Submitted with Kilo Drill Core Samples 198
Table 11.4: Summary of the Samples in the 2014 to 2017 Exploration Period 202
Table 11.5: Summary of Drilling Undertaken in 2016 to 2017 203
Table 11.6: Summary of Performance of QA/QC Materials Inserted in 2014 to 2017 203
Table 11.7: Source, Type, and Grade of Various Standards used in 2014 to 2017 203
Table 11.8: Distribution of Standards Across the Imbo Project 204
Table 11.9: Summary of Overall Performance of Standards Used 204
Table 11.10: Summary of Overall Performance of Standards by Prospects 204


Table 11.11: Basic Statistics of Blanks Submitted as Part of 2014 to 2017 QA/QC Programme 207
Table 11.12: Summary of Standards used in QA/QC Programme for Adumbi Deposit 208
Table 11.13: Summarised Performance of Standards Used in QA/QC Programme for Adumbi Deposit 208
Table 11.14: Results for Batch Testing of Blanks 213
Table 11.15: Results of Failed Blanks 214
Table 11.16: Summary of Samples sent to the Sample Preparation Laboratory for Processing 217
Table 11.17: Summary of Drilling Undertaken in 2020 to 2021 218
Table 11.18: Summary of Performance of QA/QC Materials Inserted in 2020 to 2021 218
Table 11.19: Source, Type, and Grade of Various Standards used in 2020 to 2021 218
Table 11.20: Distribution of Standards Across the Imbo Project 219
Table 11.21: Summary of Overall Performance of Standards Used 219
Table 11.22: Basic Statistics of Blanks Submitted as Part of 2020 to 2021 QA/QC Programme 222
Table 11.23: Summary of Standards used in QA/QC Programme for Adumbi Deposit 222
Table 11.24: Summarised Performance of Standards Used in QA/QC Programme for Adumbi Deposit 222
Table 11.25: Results for Batch Testing of Blanks 226
Table 11.26: Results of Failed Blanks 228
Table 11.27: Inter-Laboratory Comparison: SGS Mwanza vs ALS Chemex, RSA 231
Table 11.28: QC Materials Inserted by SGS in Samples Analysed for Loncor in 2020 to 2021 232
Table 13.1: Summary of the Test Work Results 238
Table 14.1: Significant Intercepts from Drillholes Drilled in 2020 to 2021 241
Table 14.2: Basic Statistics of All Adumbi Samples and Selected Samples within Wireframe Model 244
Table 14.3: Distribution of Mineral Intercepts over Various Lithologies at Adumbi 245
Table 14.4: Relative Density used for Minecon Resource Estimation 245
Table 14.5: Descriptive Statistics of Selected and 2 m Composite and Capped Samples within Mineralised Zones 253
Table 14.6: Descriptive Statistics of Selected Samples within Mineralised Zones from Wireframes 254
Table 14.7: Variogram Model Parameters 257
Table 14.8: Adumbi Block Model Origin and Block Size 257
Table 14.9: Adumbi Model Limits 257
Table 14.10: Ellipsoidal Search Parameters 257
Table 14.11: Adumbi Block Model Prototype 258
Table 14.12: Adumbi Mineral Resource Sensitivity by Cut-Off Grade 263
Table 14.13: Statistical Comparison of Block Model and Selected Samples within Wireframe 267
Table 14.14: Model vs Ore Wireframe Extent Comparison 268
Table 14.15: Adumbi Deposit Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources  (Effective Date: November 17, 2021) 269
Table 14.16: Adumbi Mineral Resources by Material Type (Effective Date: November 17, 2021) 270


Table 14.17: Inferred Mineral Resource for the Imbo Project (Effective Date: November 17, 2021) 270
Table 26.1: Proposed Budget for Follow-Up Work on the Adumbi Deposit and Imbo Project  288

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1.1: Location of the Imbo Project in East Africa 24
Figure 4.1: Locality Map of the Imbo Project in Africa 42
Figure 4.2: Location of Imbo Project within the DRC 43
Figure 4.3: Locality Map of Imbo Project 44
Figure 4.4: Imbo Project Simplified Geology 46
Figure 5.1: Accessibility and Locality Map 49
Figure 7.1: Main Gold Projects and Prospects within the Ngayu Greenstone Belt 62
Figure 7.2: Imbo Project - Simplified Geology 63
Figure 7.3: Adumbi Deposit - Geological Map 65
Figure 7.4: Adumbi Deposit - Geological Cross Section 65
Figure 7.5: Adumbi Deposit - Interpretation of BIF Package 67
Figure 7.6: Kitenge Deposit - Surface Geological Map 68
Figure 7.7: Manzako Deposit - Geological Map 70
Figure 7.8: Kitenge Deposit - Cross Section through Drillholes SKDD0002 and SKDD0025 72
Figure 7.9: Manzako Deposit - Cross Section through Drillholes SMDD0017 and SNDD0038 73
Figure 7.10: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold in Drillhole LADD001 77
Figure 7.11: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold in Drillhole LADD003 79
Figure 7.12: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold in Drillhole LADD004 81
Figure 7.13: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold in Drillhole LADD006 83
Figure 7.14: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold in Drillhole LADD007 85
Figure 7.15: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold in Drillhole LADD008 87
Figure 7.16: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold in Drillhole LADD009 88
Figure 7.17: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold in Drillhole LADD012 90
Figure 7.18: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold in Drillhole LADD013 91
Figure 7.19: Visible Gold in Unsplit Core and Split Core 93
Figure 7.20: Visible Gold in Drillhole LADD026 93
Figure 7.21: Imbo Project - Bedding, Foliation and Quartz Veins with Stereonet Plots 95


Figure 7.22: Adumbi Deposit - Geology from Underground Mapping Bedding Planes (Insert of Stereonet Plot for Bedding) 97
Figure 7.23: Adumbi Deposit - Geology from Underground Mapping Bedding Planes (Insert of Stereonet Plot for Foliation) 98
Figure 7.24: Adumbi Deposit - Geology from Underground Mapping, Quartz Veins (Insert of Stereonet Plot for Quartz Veins) 99
Figure 7.25: Adumbi Deposit - Geology from Underground Mapping (Inserts of Stereonet Plots for Selected Domains (Blocks 1 to 4)) 100
Figure 7.26: Adumbi Deposit - Geology Foliations (Inserts of Stereonet Plots for Foliations at Senegal, Kitenge and Senegal-Kitenge Area) 102
Figure 7.27: Manzako Deposit - Geology, Foliations, Quartz Veins (Inserts of Stereonet Plot for Foliations and Quartz Veins) 104
Figure 7.28: Stereonet Plot for Bedding Planes from Completed 2020 to 2021 Drillholes 105
Figure 7.29: Stereonet Plot for Foliation Planes from Completed 2020 to 2021 Drillholes 106
Figure 7.30: Stereonet Plot for Quartz Veins from Completed 2020 to 2021 Drillholes 107
Figure 7.31: Stereonet Plot for Intersection Lineation of Bedding and Foliation from Completed 2020 to 2021 Drillholes 107
Figure 7.32: Stereonet Plot for Intersection Lineation of Foliation and Quartz Veins from Completed 2020 to 2021 Drillholes 108
Figure 9.1: Location of BLEG Catchment Areas and Sampling Sites on the Imbo Project 114
Figure 9.2: Imbo Project - Location of BLEG Catchment Areas, Sampling Points and Drainage Channels on the 5 m Image 115
Figure 9.3: Phase 1 and 2 BLEG Results for Au showing Catchments Recommended for Follow-Up 118
Figure 9.4: Geological Map of Adumbi and Adumbi West Areas showing Artisanal Activities 122
Figure 9.5: Adumbi West Prospect - Trench Mapping and Sampling 123
Figure 9.6: Adumbi Deposit - Survey of Drillhole Collars 125
Figure 9.7: Comparison of Drillhole Collar Locations using Old and New Survey 126
Figure 9.8: Adumbi Deposit - Adit Locations Map 127
Figure 9.9: Adumbi Deposit - Adit Surveying 128
Figure 9.10: Pole-Dipole Voxels for Adumbi and Adumbi West 131
Figure 9.11: Pole-Dipole Results and the Adumbi, Mabele Mokonzi and Adumbi West Areas, Overlain on the Magnetics (Reduced-to-Pole) 132
Figure 9.12: Gradient Array IP Layout 133
Figure 9.13: IP Coverage on the Imbo Project 134
Figure 9.14: Gradient Array IP Maps for the Adumbi-Kitenge Area 135
Figure 9.15: Gradient Array Anomalies Superimposed on the PDP at the 500 m RL 137
Figure 9.16: Imbo Project - Locality Map 138
Figure 9.17: Comparison of Relative Densities from Laboratories for Drillhole SADD0019 140
Figure 9.18: Comparison of the RPA Oxidation Levels with the Current Study 142
Figure 9.19: Soil Geochemical Trends with Colonial/Artisanal Workings and Channel Samples 146
Figure 10.1: Location of Drill Targets on the Imbo Project (Adumbi South, Adumbi West and Kitenge Extension) 154
Figure 10.2: Plan of the Interpreted Mineralised Zones 157


Figure 10.3: Longitudinal Section of Adumbi Showing the Down Dip/Plunge, Potential and Proposed Drillholes 158
Figure 10.4: Sandvik DE 710 Rig, Drilling LADD001 160
Figure 10.5: Atlas Copco CS 14 Rig, Drilling LADD004 160
Figure 10.6: Bedding in BIF Unit of LADD001, from 153.20 m to 153.45 m 161
Figure 10.7: Foliation in QCS Unit of LADD003, from 100.80 m to 101.02 m 161
Figure 10.8: Quartz Veining in QCS Unit of LADD001, from 340.67 m to 340.87 m 161
Figure 10.9: Use of a Kenometer to Measure Alpha (α) and Beta (β) Angles of an Oriented Core 162
Figure 10.10: Core Tray showing BOHL, Metre Marks and Driller's Metre Blocks 163
Figure 10.11: Trimble R10 GNSS Survey Control Points and Rover Receiver Surveying Drillhole Collar 163
Figure 10.12: Adumbi Planned and Completed Drillholes with Access Roads 164
Figure 10.13: Senior Geologists Logging Core from LADD001 166
Figure 10.14: Strater Log for LADD023 - Page 1 167
Figure 10.15: Strater Log for LADD023 - Page 2 168
Figure 10.16: Strater Log for LADD023 - Page 3 169
Figure 10.17: Strater Log for LADD023 - Page 4 170
Figure 10.18: Strater Log for LADD023 - Page 5 171
Figure 10.19: Strater Log for LADD023 - Page 6 172
Figure 10.20: Strater Log for LADD023 - Page 7 173
Figure 10.21: Quartz-Carbonate Schist, LADD014, 153.75 m to 154.00 m 178
Figure 10.22: Carbonaceous Schist, LADD012, 767.07 m to 767.27 m 179
Figure 10.23: Banded Iron Formation, LADD013, 378.67 m to 378.87 m 179
Figure 10.24: Dolerite, LADD012, from 939.20 m to 939.31 m 179
Figure 10.25: Distal Alteration: Ankerite Replacement of Magnetite, LADD013, 430.97 m to 431.12 m 180
Figure 10.26: Magnetite Bands Totally Replaced by Sulphides and Quartz, LADD013, 426.18 m to 426.33 m 180
Figure 10.27: Proximal Alteration resulting in Complete Recrystallisation and Replacement of the BIF, LADD013, 425.07 m to 425.23 m 181
Figure 10.28: Adumbi Surface Geology Showing Section Lines through LADD009, LADD012 and LADD025 181
Figure 10.29: Cross Section through Drillhole LADD009 182
Figure 10.30: Cross Section through Drillhole LADD012 183
Figure 10.31: Cross Section through Drillhole LADD025 184
Figure 10.32: Improvised Fixed Environment for Core Photography 185
Figure 10.33: Marked Line in Red along which Core cutting is Done 188
Figure 10.34: Adumbi Mining Staff cutting Core from LADD001 188
Figure 10.35: Senior Geologist Sampling Core from LADD001 189
Figure 10.36: Mambo Bado Plan Map showing Location of Planned Drillholes, Channel and Bedrock Workings 190
Figure 11.1: Standard Control Sheet Showing Assay Values, Mean and Control Limits for Standard OxN49 198
Figure 11.2: Assay and Re-Assay Results Sheets 199
Figure 11.3: Standard Control Performance Chart for Oxi96, Imbo Project 204
Figure 11.4: Standard Control Performance Chart for SK62, Imbo Project 205


Figure 11.5: Standard Control Performance Chart for HiSilP1, Imbo Project 205
Figure 11.6: Standard Control Performance Chart for OxP91, Imbo Project 206
Figure 11.7: Standard Control Performance Chart for OxG98, Adumbi Deposit Only 208
Figure 11.8: Standard Control Performance Chart for Oxi96, Adumbi Deposit Only 208
Figure 11.9: Standard Control Performance Chart for HiSilK2, Adumbi Deposit Only 209
Figure 11.10: Standard Control Performance Chart for SK62, Adumbi Deposit Only 209
Figure 11.11: Standard Control Performance Chart for HiSilP1, Adumbi Deposit Only 210
Figure 11.12: Standard Control Performance Chart for OxP91, Adumbi Deposit Only 210
Figure 11.13: Standard Control Performance Chart for SQ48, Adumbi Deposit Only 211
Figure 11.14: Performance Chart of all Blanks Inserted in the 2014 to 2017 Programme 214
Figure 11.15: Standard Control Performance Chart for HiSilK2, Imbo Project 219
Figure 11.16: Standard Control Performance Chart for SK62, Imbo Project 219
Figure 11.17: Standard Control Performance Chart for HiSilP1, Imbo Project 220
Figure 11.18: Standard Control Performance Chart for SQ48, Imbo Project 220
Figure 11.19: Standard Control Performance Chart for HiSilK2, Adumbi Deposit Only 222
Figure 11.20: Standard Control Performance Chart for SK62, Adumbi Deposit Only 223
Figure 11.21: Standard Control Performance Chart for HiSilP1, Adumbi Deposit Only 223
Figure 11.22: Standard Control Performance Chart for SQ48, Adumbi Deposit Only 224
Figure 11.23: Performance Chart for All Blanks Inserted in the 2020 to 2021 Programme 227
Figure 11.24: Original Versus Duplicate Assay Plots for Duplicates Inserted in the 2020 to 2021 Programme 229
Figure 11.25: 2021 Inter-Laboratory Assay Comparison: SGS_MWZ vs ALS 230
Figure 14.1: Adumbi Deposit - 3D of Lithological Model 245
Figure 14.2: Sections through SADD0005, 0049, 0053, LADD0015, 001, 004 and 009 showing 2020-21 Interpreted Mineralised Outlines 246
Figure 14.3: Flitch at RL560 showing Interpreted 2021 Ore Outline 247
Figure 14.4: 3D View of Adumbi Mineralisation Wireframe 247
Figure 14.5: Sections through Adumbi Model showing Relative Location of Redox Surfaces used by Minecon in April 2021 vs November 2021 248
Figure 14.6: Plot of Adumbi Selected Sample Grades vs Sample Lengths 249
Figure 14.7: Histogram of Selected Au Distribution 250
Figure 14.8: Frequency vs Log Grade Plot of Selected Samples 250
Figure 14.9: Probability Plot of all the Selected Gold Assays 251
Figure 14.10: Select Sample Length vs Count 253
Figure 14.11: Histogram of the resulting 2 m Composite Lengths at MODE=1 254
Figure 14.12: Adumbi Variograms and Models in Different Directions 255
Figure 14.13: Section through Model Coloured on KEF Values and Classified as Indicated and Inferred Resource 259
Figure 14.14: Adumbi Model Section showing the US$1,500/oz April 2021 Inferred Resource Pit Shell and the US$1,600/oz November 2021 Pit Shell 260
Figure 14.15: Adumbi Section showing Resource Model with Holes coloured on Grade and the US$1,500/oz April 2021 Pit Shell and the US$1,600/oz November Pit Shell 261
Figure 14.16: Adumbi Block Model coloured by Material Type: Oxide, Transition and Fresh 261
Figure 14.17: 3D Grade Model showing the April 2021 US$1,500/oz and November 2021 US$1,600/oz Pit Shell 262
Figure 14.18: Grade-Tonnage Curve for Adumbi Mineral Resource 263


Figure 14.19: Adumbi Deposit Model Flitch at RL560 Coloured on Grade US$1,500/oz April 2021 Pit Shell and US$1,600/oz November 2021 Pit Shell 264
Figure 14.20: Adumbi Model Section showing the US$1,500/oz April 2021 Inferred Resource Pit Shell and the US$1,600/oz November 2021 Pit Shell 265
Figure 14.21: Adumbi Section showing Resource Model with Holes Coloured on Grade and the US$1,500/oz April 2021 Pit Shell and the US$1,600/oz November Pit Shell 266
Figure 14.22: Cross-Validation Graph 267
Figure 14.23: Search Ellipsoid Orientation for Grade Interpolation 268
Figure 14.24: Adumbi Deposit Long Section with Existing and Recommended Drillholes 272
Figure 23.1: Main Gold Projects and Prospects within the Ngayu Greenstone Belt 273

LIST OF UNITS

Unit

Description

°

degree

'

minutes

%

percentage

% m/m

percentage mass by mass

% w/v

percentage weight by volume

% w/w

percentage weight by weight

μg

microgram

μm

micrometre (micron)

μS

microsiemens

°C

degree Celsius

a

annum

bbl

barrels

cal

calorie

cfm

cubic feet per minute

cm

centimetre

cm2

square centimetre

C$

Canadian dollar

d

day

dB

decibel

dia.

diameter

dmt

dry metric tonne

dwt

deadweight tonne

°F

degree Fahrenheit

g

gram

G

giga (billion)

g/cm3

gram per cubic centimetre

g/L

gram per litre

g/t

gram per metric tonne

Ga

billion years (109 years)

h

hour

ha

hectare

k

kilo (thousand)

kg

kilogram

km

kilometre

km2

square kilometre

koz

thousand troy ounces




Unit

Description

kt

thousand metric tonnes

kt/a

thousand metric tonnes per annum

L

litre

L/s

litre per second

lb

pound

m

metre

m2

square metre

m3

cubic metre

m/s

Metre per second

MASL

metre above sea level

min

minute

mm

millimetre

Mm3

million cubic metres

Moz

million troy ounces

MPa

megapascal

Mt

million metric tonnes

N

newton

Nm

newton metre

oz

troy ounce

Pa

pascal

Pa s

pascal second

ppb

part per billion

ppm

part per million

RL

relative elevation

s

second

s-1

reciprocal second

t

metric tonne

t/a

metric tonne per annum

t/m3

metric tonne per cubic metre

US$

United States dollar

wmt

wet metric tonne

wt%

weight percentage

It is noted that, throughout the report, table columns might not add up due to rounding.


LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

Abbreviation

Description

AA

Atomic Absorption

AARL

Anglo American Research Laboratory

AACE

Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering

AAS

Atomic absorption spectroscopy

ABA

Acid-base accounting

ACSA

Albite-Carbonate-Silica Alteration

Ai

Abrasion index

ALS

ALS Laboratories

AMTEC 

AMTEC Laboratories

ANSUL

Fire Suppression Supply Company

ARD

Acid rock drainage

ASM

Artisanal and small-scale mining

AusIMM

Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy

BBWi

Bond ball work index

BESS

Battery energy storage system

BFA

Bench face angle

BHID

Borehole identification

BIF

Banded Iron Formation

BLEG

Bulk leach extractable gold

BM

Block model

BMP

Biodiversity Management Plan

BOCO

Base of complete oxidation

BOQ

Bill of quantities

BRGM

French Geological Survey

BRWi

Bond rod work index

BRT

Bottle roll test

C&I

Control and instrumentation

CA

Confidentiality Agreement

CAGR

Compound annual growth rate

CAMI

Cadastre Minier

CBS

Carbonaceous schist

CCTV

Closed-circuit television

CDF

Co-disposal facility

CHK

Central Hospital Kibali

CIL

Carbon in leach




Abbreviation

Description

CIM

Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum

CIP

Carbon in pulp

CMT

Constant money terms

COS

Coarse ore stockpile

CP

Competent Person

CPE

Standing Committee of Evaluation

CRM

Certified reference material

CSR

Community Social Relations

CSS

Closed side setting

CTSF

Cyanide tailings storage facility

COV

Coefficient of variation

CWi

Crushability work index

DC

Direct Current

DCF

Discounted cash flow

DD/DDH

Diamond drillhole

DFS

Definitive Feasibility Study

DMR

South African Department of Mineral Resources

DRC

Democratic Republic of the Congo

DTM

Digital terrain model

DTP

DTP Company, subsidiary of Bouygues

EC

European Commission

ECSA

Engineering Council of South Africa

EDA

Estimation Data Analysis

EGRG

Extended gravity recoverable gold

EM

Electromagnetic

EOH

End of hole

EOM

End of month

EOY

End of year

EP

Equator Principle

EU

European Union

EW

Electrowinning

FA

Fire assay

FGO

Full grade ore

FoS

Factor of safety

FR

Fresh rock

FRM

Société Internationale Forestière et Minière du Congo

FS

Feasibility Study




Abbreviation

Description

G&A

General and administration

GA

General arrangement

GC

Grade control

GDP

Gross domestic product

GHG

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

GIIP

Good international industry practice

GIS

Geographic information system

GISTM

Global Industry Standard on Tailings Management

GPS

Global positioning system

GT

Grade tonnage

HAS

High arsenic

HAZOP

Hazard and operability

HDPE

High-density polyethylene

HQ

Core size (63.3 mm)

HR

High recovery

HR

Human resources

HW

Hanging wall

HY

High yield

I/O

Input/output

IBC

Intermediate bulk container

ICMC

International Cyanide Management Code

ICP

Inductively coupled plasma

ICP-AES

Inductively coupled plasma - atomic emission spectroscopy

ICP-MS

Inductively coupled plasma - mass spectrometry

ID

Inverse distance

IEC

International Electrotechnical Commission

IFC

International Finance Corporation

ILR

Intensive leach reactor

IP

Induced polarisation

IRR

Internal rate of return

ISO

International Organization for Standardization

IT

Information technology

IUCN

International Union for Conservation of Nature

JORC

Joint Ore Reserves Committee (of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Australian Institute of Geoscientists and the Minerals Council of Australia)

JV

Joint Venture




Abbreviation

Description

KCD

Karagba Chauffeur Durba Orebody

KE

Kriging Efficiency

Kilo

Kilo Goldmines Ltd

KMS

Kibali Mining Services

KZ

KZ Structure

LAN

Local area network

LAS

Low arsenic

LBMA

London Bullion Market Association

LCT

Locked cycle test

LiDAR

Light detection and ranging

LIMS

Laboratory Information Management System

LME

London Metal Exchange

Loncor

Loncor Gold Inc.

LR

Low recovery

LV

Low voltage

MAS

Medium arsenic

MBA

Master of Business Administration

MCC

Motor control centre

MCE

Maximum Considered Earthquake

MCF

Mine Call Factor

MCP

Meta-Conglomerate Package

MG

Medium grade

MIA

Mining industrial area

MIBC

Methyl isobutyl carbinol

MIMMM

Member of the Institute of Materials, Minerals and Mining

Minecon

Minecon Resources and Services Limited

MO

Marginal Ore

MRMM

Mining Rock Mass Model

MRP

Mitigation and Rehabilitation Plan

MSI 3D

Mine Surveying International Limited

MSS

Metasediments

MTO

Material take-off

NAG

Net acid generating

NGL

Natural ground level

NGO

Non-Governmental Organisation

NI 43-101

Canadian Securities Administrators' National Instrument (NI) 43-101

NQ

Core size (47.6 mm)




Abbreviation

Description

ODBC

Open database connectivity

OFS

Optimised Feasibility Study

OK

Ordinary Kriging

OKIMO

DRC Governmental Entity

OMC

Orway Mineral Consultants

OP

Open Pit

OREAS

Ore Research and Exploration Pty Ltd (CRM Manufacturer)

ORP

Operational Readiness Plan

P&G

Preliminary and general

PAG

Potentially acid generating

PAS

Process automation system

PAX

Potassium amyl xanthate

PFS

Pre-Feasibility Study

PGA

Peak ground acceleration

PLC

Programmable logic controller

PM

Particulate matter

PQ

Core size (85.0 mm)

PSA

Pressure swing adsorption

PSD

Particle size distribution

PV

Photovoltaic

Q-Q

Quantile-quantile

QA

Quality assurance

QC

Quality control

QCS

Quartz carbonate schist

QG

QG Australia Pty Ltd

QP

Qualified Person

R&R

Rest and relaxation

RAB

Rotary air blasted

RC

Reverse circulation

RD

Relative density

RED

Reducing

RES

Resource domain

RMCA

Royal Museum for Central Africa

RMR/MRMR

Rock mass rating/mining rock mass rating

ROM

Run of mine

RP

Replaced rock

RPA

Roscoe Postle Associates Inc.




Abbreviation

Description

RQD

Rock quality designation

RWD

Return water dam

SAG

Semi-autogenous grinding

SAIMM

Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy

SAMREC

South African Code for the Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves

SAP

Saprolite or German Company

SCADA

Supervisory control and data acquisition

SCH

Schist

SEC

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

SEDAR

System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval

SG

Specific gravity

SGS

SGS laboratories

SHE

Safety Health Environmental

S-K 1300

SEC's Modernized Property Disclosure Requirements for Mining Registrants as described in Subpart 229.1300 of Regulation S-K, Disclosure by Registrants Engaged in Mining Operations (including Item 601 (b)(96) Technical Report Summary)

SLTO

Social Licence to Operate

SMBS

Sodium metabisulphite

SMC

SAG Mill Comminution

SMPP

Structural, mechanical, plate work and piping

SOKIMO

Société Minière de Kilo-Moto

SOP

Standard operating procedure

SOX

Sarbanes Oxley Act

SQL

Structured Query Language Database

SR

Slope of Regression

SRK

Steffen Roberts and Kirsten, Engineering Company

STD/StdDev

Standard deviation

SWATH

One-dimensional analysis graph in a specific direction of interest

TDS

Total dissolved solids

TOFR

Top of fresh rock

TSS

Total suspended solids

TSX

Toronto Stock Exchange

UC

Uniform conditioning

UCS

Uniaxial compressive strength

UPS

Uninterruptible power supply

UTM

Universal Transverse Mercator




Abbreviation

Description

VG

Visible gold

WAD

Weak acid dissociable (cyanide)

WAIMM

West African Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum

WHO

World Health Organisation

XRF

X-ray fluorescence



1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 INTRODUCTION

Minecon Resources and Services Limited (Minecon) was engaged by Loncor Gold Inc. (Loncor) to prepare an independent Technical Report Summary (TRS) with respect to Loncor's Imbo Project in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) The purpose of this TRS is to support the inclusion of the Imbo Project's Mineral Resource estimates in Loncor's Form 20-F annual report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).  This TRS conforms to the SEC's Modernized Property Disclosure Requirements for Mining Registrants as described in Subpart 229.1300 of Regulation S-K, Disclosure by Registrants Engaged in Mining Operations (S-K 1300) (including Item 601 (b)(96) Technical Report Summary).

1.2 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION

Loncor's Imbo Project is located in the Mambasa District of the Ituri Province, in the northeastern region of the DRC, 260 km west of Bunia, the capital of the Ituri Province, and 225 km northwest of the city of Beni. The Adumbi base camp within the Imbo exploitation permit area is located at latitude 1º 43' 58.76" N and longitude 27º 52' 4.01" E or 596,522 m E and 191,570 m N (WGS 84 UTM Zone 35N) (see Figure 1.1).

Figure 1.1: Location of the Imbo Project in East Africa

The Imbo Project covers Exploitation Permit Number 9691, has a total area of 122 km2 and encompasses the known gold mineral deposits of Adumbi, Kitenge and Manzako and several prospects including Canal, Bagbaie, Adumbi West, Amuango, Monde Arabe, Vatican and Imbo East. Adumbi is located approximately 220 km by air southwest from the large operating gold mine of Kibali, operated by Barrick Gold, which in 2020 produced 808,134 oz.


1.3 MINERAL RIGHTS AND LAND OWNERSHIP

Loncor is a publicly listed Canadian gold exploration company and holds 84.68 % interest in the Imbo Project through its subsidiary Adumbi Mining S.A., with the minority shareholders holding 15.32 % (including the 10 % free-carried interest held by the Government of the DRC). The Imbo exploitation permit is valid until February 2039.

Minecon relied on a letter on land tenure, licences, and permits dated June 8, 2020, from MBM-Conseil, one of the leading firms practising mining law in the DRC. The Imbo Project comprises a Permis d'Exploitation (PE 9691) or Exploitation Licence held by Adumbi Mining S.A., granted for the period February 23, 2009, to February 22, 2039 (and renewable for an additional 15 years), for gold and diamonds and covering a total of 122 km2.

Under an agreement signed in April 2010 with the minority partners of Adumbi Mining S.A., Loncor agreed to finance all the activities of Adumbi Mining S.A., until the filing of a bankable feasibility study, by way of loans which bear interest at a rate of 5 % per annum. Within thirty days of the receipt of a bankable feasibility study, the minority partners may collectively elect to exchange their equity participation for either a 2 % net smelter royalty or a 1 % net smelter royalty plus an amount equal to €2/oz of Proven Ore Reserves.

The DRC 2018 Mining Code imposes a royalty tax payable to the State on the sale of minerals, at a rate of 3.5 % for precious metals.

1.4 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, PHYSIOGRAPHY AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Located approximately 225 km by air southeast of the Adumbi deposit, Beni is the nearest major population centre to the Imbo Project and has a population of approximately 230,000. Loncor maintains an administrative office in Beni. The city has a lateritic airstrip with scheduled internal flights to other towns in DRC such as Goma, Bunia, Isiro, Kisangani and Kinshasa. The Isiro airstrip is approximately 200 km by lateritic road to the Imbo Project. From Beni, the Imbo Project is accessible via 322 km of lateritic road to Nia-Nia (where there is a lateritic airstrip), then to Village 47 (47 km north of Nia-Nia) and then via 7 km of lateritic roads to the Adumbi base camp.

The nearest international airport is located at Entebbe in western Uganda and linked by 440 km of paved road to the Kasindi Uganda-DRC border, followed by 80 km of unpaved lateritic roads to Beni. Entebbe has international scheduled flights to South Africa, Europe and Asia and is also linked to other African countries as well as the in-country towns of Kinshasa and Lubumbashi via Nairobi (Kenya).

The climate in the Imbo area is typically tropical and is characterised by a long wet season and short dry season of up to three months from mid-December to mid-March. The average annual rainfall is approximately 2,000 mm to 2,500 mm, with the highest rainfall generally occurring in October. Temperatures are uniformly high throughout the year, and there is little diurnal variability, varying between 19 °C and 23 °C, with daily lows and highs of 16 °C and 33 °C, respectively. Humidity is high throughout the year (75 % to 99 %).


The Imbo Project is located in the Ituri tropical rainforest within the upper reaches of the Congo River Basin. The project area topographically consists of an undulating terrain that varies from approximately 600 m above sea level to 800 m above sea level. Most of the surface area is covered with dense evergreen forests with a closed canopy; however, the hills tend to have relatively steep slopes, and the valley floors within the areas of the linear hills are relatively narrow.

The Imbo Project is drained by numerous creeks and streams, which flow into the Upper Ituri river and its main tributaries: the Epulu, Nepoko, Nduye, Lenda, Ebiena, and Ngayu rivers, which form part of the upper reaches of the Congo River Basin. The closest hydroelectric power station is situated near Kisangani together with the hydroelectric stations supplying power to Barrick Gold/AngloGold Ashanti's Kibali Gold Mine. The towns of Isiro and Beni are potential sources of skilled manpower, and there is sufficient local unskilled manpower in the surroundings of Adumbi.

Given its exploration stage of development, there is limited infrastructure currently available at Adumbi. Presently, infrastructure is composed of an exploration camp (the Adumbi base camp) with associated helicopter landing pad, administration building, accommodation buildings and facilities, field office, core logging and storage facilities, diesel generators and solar power generation, and a sample preparation laboratory.

1.5 EXPLORATION HISTORY

Belgian prospectors were the first to discover gold on the Imbo Project in the early 1900s, with gold production focusing on alluvial deposits until the late 1930s. Primary gold mineralisation was later discovered in the bedrock of the alluvial zones and was exploited in shallow pits and trenches. This was later followed by mining from deep trenches and underground galleries. From the mid-1970s to mid-1980s, the French Geological Survey (BRGM) undertook geological investigations of the Imbo Project area.

The mining rights for the mineral concessions in the Imbo Project area were initially held by Société Internationale Forestière et Minière du Congo (FORMINIÈRE or FRM) from the 1920s to the late 1950s. The Belgian colonial state was co-owner of a 50 % stake in FRM, with the remainder held by American interests. The Société Minière de la Tele (SMT), a subsidiary of FRM, oversaw development and exploitation. Following political independence in 1960, ownership has changed hands multiple times.

Highlights of the reported historical exploration include the following:


1.6 GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND GOLD MINERALISATION

The Adumbi gold deposit is found within the Ngayu Archean greenstone belt, one of a number of Archean-aged, granite-greenstone belts that extend from northern Tanzania into northeastern DRC and then into the Central African Republic. The greenstone belt terrain in northeastern DRC has a number of major gold belts including Moto (Kibali), Kilo, Mambasa, Ngayu and Isiro.

The majority of the gold occurrences within the Ngayu belt are located close to the contact of the Banded Ironstone Formation (BIF). Historically, only two deposits were exploited on any significant scale, namely Yindi and Adumbi. Styles of gold mineralisation within the Ngayu belt include shears within the BIF or on the BIF contacts, disseminated mineralisation, and shears within basalts and schists, resulting in discrete auriferous gold veins. Artisanal mining of weathered gold mineralisation preserved as elluvial or colluvial material is widespread throughout the belt.

Within the Imbo Project area, there is a strong association between gold mineralisation and the presence of the BIF, with the BIF constituting the host rock (e.g., Adumbi) or forming a significant part of the local stratigraphy in the Imbo Project area. The BIF forms both physical and chemical traps for mineralising hydrothermal fluids. The iron-rich BIF is a chemically reactive rock, the main interaction with hydrothermal fluids involving the reduction of magnetite to pyrite, resulting in the precipitation of gold. Mineralisation on the Imbo Project (PE9691) is known to occur at Bagbaie (referred to as Adumbi North), Adumbi, Kitenge, Manzako, Monde Arabe, Maiepunji and Vatican.


Adumbi is currently the most explored deposit within the Imbo Project. Adumbi forms a topographic high (Adumbi Hill) and incorporates the Canal prospect, which is the southeastern continuation of Adumbi. Based on examined drillholes, the rocks at Adumbi mainly comprise a subvertical sequence of metamorphosed clastic sediments (pelites, siltstones and greywacke) interbedded with units of BIF of varying width. The grade of metamorphism is probably lower greenschist facies, and the clastic units are petrographically classified as schists. Foliation is usually clearly defined in hand specimens although sedimentary features such as bedding are frequently preserved.

The Adumbi deposit displays five distinct geological domains with the BIF unit attaining a thickness of up to 130 m in the central part. There is a higher-grade zone of gold mineralisation termed the "replaced rock zone" (RP zone) associated with alteration and structural deformation that has completely destroyed the primary host lithological fabric. The RP zone occurs in the lower part of the Upper BIF package and in the Lower BIF package, and transgresses the Carbonaceous Marker, located between the Upper and Lower BIF packages, both along strike and down dip. The geological interpretation from the Loncor drill intersections demonstrates that the mineralised BIF increases in thickness with depth and thus confirms the existence of significant underground potential at Adumbi below the mineral resources within the open-pit shell.

The detailed logging of the mineralised cores indicated a direct relationship between gold values and the percentage of sulphide mineralisation and intensity of silicification. In general, pyrite is the dominant sulphide followed by pyrrhotite, then arsenopyrite. When pyrite and pyrrhotite are associated with arsenopyrite, the gold values are very significant, compared to when pyrite is associated with pyrrhotite only. Silica is associated with the highest degree of hydrothermal alteration within the zones and serves as a marker of mineralisation; however, without sulphides, the gold values are insignificant. Specks of visible gold are occasionally found, generally within fractures and are present in white to grey, glassy, weak to moderately brecciated quartz veins.

1.7 DEPOSIT TYPES

Gold deposits within the Imbo Project are associated with the globally important Neo-Archean orogenic gold deposits, examples of which are found in most Neo-Archean cratons around the world. Gold mineralisation is associated with the epigenetic mesothermal style of mineralisation. This style of mineralisation is typical of gold deposits in Neo-Archean greenstone terranes and is generally associated with regionally metamorphosed rocks that have experienced a long history of thermal and deformational events. These deposits are invariably structurally controlled.

Mineralisation in this environment is commonly of the fracture and vein type in brittle fracture to ductile dislocation zones. At the Adumbi deposit, the gold mineralisation is generally associated with quartz and quartz-carbonate-pyrite ± pyrrhotite ± arsenopyrite veins in a BIF horizon.


Examples of similar type BIF hosted gold deposits to Adumbi include Geita in Tanzania, Kibali in northeastern DRC, Tasiast in Mauritania, Homestake (U.S.A.), Lupin (Canada) and Moro Velho in Brazil.

1.8 EXPLORATION

The Imbo Project has been explored since the early 1900s by Belgian prospectors and more recently by Kilo and then Loncor. During the period 2010 to 2012, 44 trenches totalling 4,753 m were excavated over the Adumbi, Kitenge and Manzako targets. Accessible adits and underground workings were also geologically mapped and sampled at Adumbi; however, those at Kitenge and Manzako were not accessible. In all, a total of 907 m was sampled.

By November 2013, Kilo had completed 167 diamond drillholes totalling 35,400 m on the Imbo Project. Kilo outsourced sample preparation and analysis to independent assayers ALS Geochemistry (ALS). Drill core sample preparation was conducted at ALS Mwanza (Tanzania) from 2010 to August 2011, and then at an on-site purpose-built container facility supplied and managed by ALS Minerals. Analyses were undertaken by ALS Johannesburg (South Africa) and ALS Vancouver (Canada).

In February 2014, independent consultants RPA completed an independent NI 43-101 technical report on the Imbo Project and estimated 1.675 Moz (20.78 Mt grading 2.5 g/t Au) of Inferred Mineral Resources on the three separate deposits of Adumbi, Kitenge and Manzako.

RPA made several recommendations on Adumbi, which were addressed in subsequent exploration programmes. In September 2020, Loncor signed a management service agreement with Minecon to manage the infill and extension drilling programme on the Adumbi deposit.

1.9 DRILLING

The more recent drilling on the Imbo Project has been carried out by Kilo and then Loncor using contract drilling companies. The drilling programmes have been carried out in phases:

As of November 15, 2013, Kilo had completed 167 diamond drillholes totalling 35,400 m on the Imbo Project. During the 2014 to 2017 drilling programme, 63 drillholes totalling 8,900 m were drilled.

The 2020 to 2021 drilling campaign was carried out by Orezone Drilling and a total of 24 holes totalling 10,071.44 m were drilled at Adumbi. The drill core was systematically logged and photographed before cutting and sampling. Reflex Act II orientation survey equipment was used for core orientation at every run of 3 m in competent material to aid in structural measurements. Structural measurements taken during the routine logging were from bedding, foliation, and quartz veins whereas structural measurements from lithological contacts, joints and shears were captured in detail under a separate geotechnical logging programme.


1.10 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY

During the 2014 to 2017 exploration activity, sample preparation and analyses were outsourced to the SGS laboratory in Mwanza, Tanzania (which is independent of Loncor). The SGS laboratory operates a quality system that is accredited in accordance with ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and SANAS (South African National Accreditation System). The SGS laboratory acted as an umpire laboratory even while ALS Chemex was the principal laboratory; hence, correlational studies between the two laboratories have been undertaken.

As part of the 2020 to 2021 drilling programme, Loncor started using the on-site sample preparation laboratory. This has helped with the enforcement of stricter QA/QC policing on the analytical laboratory. Laboratory procedures have been documented and reviewed by Minecon senior management, and internal quality control measures have been taken. Based on the documentation and discussions with the laboratory management, Minecon's senior management does not have any concerns regarding the sample preparation for all Loncor samples.

Sample pulps are sent for analyses to SGS Mwanza, which serves as the primary laboratory. SGS is internationally accredited and utilises conventional sample preparation, sample analysis and associated quality control protocols. Once the samples are received at the SGS laboratory, the samples go through checking and reconciliation procedures, followed by the SGS sample preparation procedure (SGS Code PRP87).

Drill core, trench, adit, pit, rock chip and channel samples were analysed for gold at the SGS Mwanza laboratory using fire assay (FA) with flame atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) to measure the gold (SGS Code FAA505), and the analyses were carried out on 50 g aliquots. The effective range for FAA505 is 0.01 ppm Au to 100 ppm Au. In addition, check assays were carried out by the screen fire assay method to verify higher-grade sample assays obtained by fire assay. Internationally recognised standards and blanks were inserted at the Adumbi sample preparation laboratory as part of internal QA/QC analytical procedures.

1.11 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING

Metallurgical test work (comminution and gold recovery) was performed by Maelgwyn Mineral Services Laboratory in Johannesburg on the Adumbi mineralised samples to evaluate the process route required to obtain the highest gold recoveries that can be achieved.

Table 1.1 shows a summary of the Adumbi metallurgical test work results.

Table 1.1: Adumbi Metallurgical Test Work Results

Parameters

Unit

Oxide

Transition

Fresh

Bond Rod Work Index

kWh/t

12.7

13.6

14.6

Bond Ball Work Index

kWh/t

11.8

13.7

14.2

Abrasion Index

 

0.19

0.25

0.34

Diagnostic Leach Carbon in Leach (CIL) Recovery

%

90.76

87.53

89.9



The average diagnostic leach recovery for the fresh (sulphide) material was the weighted mean of the RP and BIF lithologies relative to the volume of their occurrence (20 % RP:80 % BIF) in the fresh material. Diagnostic leach recoveries of 80.10 % for RP and 92.37 % for BIF were realised for the fresh (sulphide) material.

Comminution results indicated that both the oxide and transition material are medium hard while the fresh material indicated that it is slightly hard.

In order to optimise the gold recovery, further test work was conducted on the fresh and transition material whereby gravity was followed by flotation on the gravity tails. The results showed that most of the gold can be floated into float concentrates as summarised in Table 1.2.

Table 1.2: Flotation Results

Sample ID

Rougher Concentrate

Gold

Sulphur

Grade (g/t)

Recovery (%)

Grade (%)

Recovery (%)

Fresh - RP

9.57

95.06

25.07

93.03

Fresh - BIF

8.30

87.16

17.90

85.13

Transition

11.82

81.31

15.80

95.52

The concentrate samples that were generated were not sufficient to enable further processing routes such as the following:

These recovery processes will be investigated during the next phase of the project to optimise the gold recovery in the transition and fresh ore types.

1.12 MINERAL RESOURCES

During Q3 of 2021, Loncor commissioned Minecon to re-evaluate and quantify the exploration work including drilling undertaken during the period 2020 to 2021. This has resulted in Minecon updating the Mineral Resource estimate of Adumbi. This follows a previous mineral resource estimate undertaken by Minecon in April 2021.

Compared to the Inferred Mineral Resource of 3.15 Moz of gold (41.316 Mt grading 2.37 g/t Au) outlined in April 2021 (see Loncor press release dated April 27, 2021), the additional drilling information and the increased gold price have contributed significantly to the increased mineral resources of the Adumbi deposit with improved confidence to 1.88 Moz (28.185 Mt grading 2.08 g/t Au) of gold in the Indicated category and 1.78 Moz (20.828 Mt grading 2.65 g/t Au) of gold in the Inferred category.


Table 1.3 summarises the Adumbi Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources based on an in-situ block cut-off grade at a 0.52 g/t Au for oxide, 0.57 g/t Au for transition and 0.63 g/t Au for fresh material, and constrained within a US$1,600/oz optimised pit shell. A total of 84.68 % of the Adumbi mineral resources are attributable to Loncor via its 84.68 % interest in the Imbo Project.

Table 1.3: Adumbi Deposit Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources
(Effective Date: November 17, 2021)

Mineral Resource Category

Tonnage

(t)

Grade

(g/t Au)

Contained Gold

(oz)

Indicated

28,185,000

2.08

1,883,000

Inferred

20,828,000

2.65

1,777,000

NOTES:

1. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.

2. Numbers might not add up due to rounding.

Table 1.4 summarises the Adumbi Indicated and Inferred category mineral resources in terms of material type.

Table 1.4: Adumbi Mineral Resources by Material Type
(Effective Date: November 17, 2021)

Material Type

Indicated Mineral Resource

Inferred Mineral Resource

Tonnage

(t)

Grade

(g/t Au)

Contained
Gold

(oz)

Tonnage

(t)

Grade

(g/t Au)

Contained
Gold

(oz)

Oxide

3,169,000

2.05

208,000

458,000

3.39

49,000

Transition

3,401,000

2.51

274,000

280,000

2.74

24,000

Fresh (Sulphide)

21,614,000

2.02

1,400,000

20,089,000

2.64

1,703,000

TOTAL

28,185,000

2.08

1,883,000

20,828,000

2.65

1,777,000

NOTES: 

1. Mineral resources were estimated at a block cut-off grade of 0.52 g/t Au for oxide, 0.57 g/t Au for transition and 0.63 g/t Au for fresh
      material constrained by a Whittle pit. 

2. Mineral Resources for Adumbi were estimated using a long-term gold price of US$1,600/oz.

3. A minimum mining width of 32 m horizontal was used.

4. A maximum of 4 m internal waste was used.

5. Adumbi bulk densities of 2.45 for oxide, 2.82 for transition and 3.05 for fresh rock were used.

6. High gold assays were capped at 18 g/t Au for Adumbi, prior to compositing at 2 m intervals.

7. Numbers might not add up due to rounding.

The Imbo Project Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resource for the combined Adumbi, Manzako and Kitenge deposits now respectively totals 1.88 Moz of gold (28.19 Mt grading 2.08 g/t Au) and 2.09 Moz of gold (22.50 Mt grading 2.89 g/t Au). The total Inferred Resource is summarised in Table 1.5.


Table 1.5: Inferred Mineral Resource for the Imbo Project
(Effective Date: November 17, 2021)

Deposit Tonnage
(t)
Grade
(g/t Au)
Contained Gold
(oz)
Adumbi 20,828,000 2.65 1,777,000
Kitenge 910,000 6.60 191,000
Manzako 770,000 5.00 122,000
TOTAL 22,508,000 2.89 2,090,000
NOTES:
1. Mineral resources were estimated at a block cut-off grade of 0.52 g/t Au for oxide, 0.57 g/t Au for transition and 0.63 g/t Au for
      fresh material constrained by a Whittle pit. 
2. Mineral Resources for Adumbi were estimated using a long-term gold price of US$1,600/oz.
3. A minimum mining width of 32 m horizontal was used.
4. A maximum of 4 m internal waste was used.
5. Adumbi bulk densities of 2.45 for oxide, 2.82 for transition and 3.05 for fresh rock were used. For Kitenge and Manzako,
      reference is made to the RPA Technical Report, where bulk densities of 1.7 for oxide, 2.2 for  transition and 2.7 for
      sulphide material were used.
6. High gold assays were capped at 18 g/t Au for Adumbi, prior to compositing at 2 m intervals. For Kitenge and
      Manzako, reference is made to the RPA Technical Report where assays were capped at 50 g/t Au, prior to compositing at
      2 m intervals.
7. Estimated historical mining has been removed.
8. Numbers might not add up due to rounding.

A total of 84.68% of the Imbo Project mineral resources are attributable to Loncor via its 84.68% interest in the Imbo Project.


1.13 MINERAL INVENTORY

The Mineral Inventory Statement is reported in accordance with the SEC's S-K 1300 requirements as well as NI 43-101 requirements.

Table 1.4 shows a summary of the Adumbi Mineral Inventory for the various material types (oxide, transition and fresh) contained within the Adumbi practical pit designs.

The following summarises the pit optimisation assumptions and parameters used to constrain the depth extent of the geological model to generate the mineral inventory of the open pit for the Adumbi deposit:

The results from the Adumbi Whittle pit optimisation for the gold price of US$1,600/oz allowed for the selection of the optimised final pit shell (Pit Shell 40) based on the maximum undiscounted cash flow for the practical pit design. The practical pit designs were prepared using the optimised pit shells as templates. The relevant Whittle pit shells were exported from the GEMS to Surpac software, where the practical pit designs were prepared. The practical pit design incorporates the ramps together with the appropriate inter-ramp slope angles. No practical pit design was prepared for the Final Pit; hence, the optimised pit shell (Pit 40) was used to define Cut 3 for the blocks to be scheduled.

The Qualified Person (QP) has performed an independent verification of the block model tonnage and grade, and in the QP's opinion, the process has been carried out to industry standards.

1.14 ADJACENT PROPERTIES

In addition to the Imbo Project, there have been other mineral exploration activities in the Ngayu Greenstone Belt in recent times, and mineral resources have been defined within the belt. Since 2010, Loncor has been the largest permit holder in the Ngayu belt and has been exploring a number of prospects on its own since 2010 or in joint venture with Barrick Gold Congo SARL (formerly Randgold Resources Congo SARL) (Barrick Gold) from 2016 to 2021.

Loncor undertook exploration over priority target areas at Yindi, Makapela, Itali, Matete, Nagasa, Mondarabe, Anguluku and Adumbi West prospects with airborne magnetic and radiometric surveys, geological mapping, stream sediment sampling, soil and rock sampling, trenching, augering and ground geophysical surveys. During the period 2010 to 2013, Loncor undertook drilling programmes on a number of prospects in Ngayu and outlined mineral resources at Makapela in the west of the belt. At Makapela, a total of 56 core holes (18,091 m) were completed in the vicinity of the Main and North pits, and 15 holes (3,594 m) were drilled at nearby Sele Sele. In April 2013, Loncor announced mineral resource estimates for Makapela with an Indicated Mineral Resource of 0.61 Moz of gold (2.20 Mt grading at 8.66 g/t Au) and an Inferred Mineral Resource of 0.55 Moz of gold (3.22 Mt grading at 5.30 g/t Au). The deposit at Makapela is open down plunge and along strike. 


Besides Makapela, Loncor drilled other prospects, and significant intersections were obtained at Yindi (21.3 m grading 3.3 g/t Au, 24.0 m grading 1.5 g/t Au and 10.3 m grading 4.1 g/t Au) and at Itali (38.82 m at 2.66 g/t Au, 14.70 m at 1.68 g/t Au and 3.95 m at 19.5 g/t Au). Further exploration including drilling is warranted on other prospects within the Ngayu belt including Yambenda, Mokepa and Mongaliema.

In terms of producing gold mines, the Kibali Gold Mine, approximately 220 km northeast by air from the Imbo Project, is located within the Archean-aged Moto greenstone belt and commenced gold production in September 2013. The mine is owned by Kibali Goldmines SA (Kibali), which is a joint venture company with 45 % owned by Barrick Gold, 45 % by AngloGold Ashanti, and 10 % by Société Minière de Kilo-Moto (SOKIMO). Barrick Gold is the operator and in 2020, Kibali produced 808,134 oz of gold at an AISC of US$778/oz of gold. Kibali had Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources of 15.5 Moz of gold, Inferred Mineral Resources of 1.5 Moz and Proven and Probable ore reserves at the end of 2020 of 9.33 Moz (from Barrick Gold 2020 Annual Report). Kibali is Africa's largest producing gold mine.

1.15 INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS

1.15.1 Introduction

The Qualified Persons (QPs) note the following interpretations and conclusions based on the review of the information available for this technical report.

1.15.2 Geology and Mineralisation

The Imbo Project is found within the Ngayu Archean greenstone belt, one of a number of Archean-aged, granite-greenstone belts that extend from northern Tanzania, into northeastern DRC and then into the Central African Republic. These gold belts contain a number of major gold mines including Kibali (DRC) and Geita, North Mara and Bulyanhulu (Tanzania). Gold deposits within these belts are associated with the globally important Neo-Archean orogenic gold deposits, examples of which are found in most Neo-Archean cratons around the world.

At the Adumbi deposit, the gold mineralisation is generally associated with quartz and quartz-carbonate-pyrite ± pyrrhotite ± arsenopyrite veins in a BIF unit. Examples of similar type BIF hosted gold deposits to Adumbi include the major Geita mine in Tanzania and Kibali mine in northeastern DRC.


1.15.3 Exploration, Drilling and Analytical Data Collection in Support of Mineral Resource Estimation

Systematic exploration has been conducted on the Adumbi deposit and Imbo Project area, including airborne LiDAR (light detection and ranging) and geophysical surveys, gridding, geological mapping, soil, trench, adit and auger sampling together with a number of core drilling programmes. Sampling, sample storage, security, sample preparation and geochemical analyses and verification are considered appropriate for the resource estimate at Adumbi.

1.15.4 Mineral Resource Methodology and Estimation

The Mineral Inventory Statement is reported in accordance with the SEC's S-K 1300 requirements as well as NI 43-101 requirements. The Adumbi Mineral Inventory for the various material types (oxide, transition and fresh) contained within the Adumbi practical pit designs consists of 1.883 Moz (28.185 Mt grading 2.08 g/t Au) of Indicated mineral resources and 1.777 Moz (20.828 Mt grading 2.65 g/t Au) of Inferred mineral resources. The data used for the resource estimate and methods employed are considered reasonable for the level of study by the QP.

1.15.5 Open-Pit Optimisation and Mineral Inventory

Pit optimisation assumptions and parameters used to constrain the depth extent of the geological model to generate the mineral inventory of the open pit for the Adumbi deposit are considered appropriate for its location and infrastructural setting with appropriate metallurgical recoveries used from the test work and a gold price of US$1,600/oz, which is below current levels.

In the QP's opinion, the parameters used in the Mineral Resource to Mineral Inventory conversion process are reasonable.

1.16 RECOMMENDATIONS

Further work is warranted at Adumbi to advance the project up the value curve. A number of opportunities have been identified to increase the mineral resources at Adumbi. It is recommended that Loncor follow up on these opportunities, which include the following:

There is excellent exploration potential to further increase the mineral resources at Adumbi and within the Imbo Project. At Adumbi, the mineralised BIF host sequence increases in thickness below the open-pit shell, and wide-spaced drilling has already intersected grades and thicknesses amenable to underground mining. Further drilling is required to initially outline a significant underground Inferred Mineral Resource which can then be combined with the open-pit mineral resource so that studies can be undertaken for a combined open-pit and underground mining scenario at Adumbi. It is also recommended that infill drilling be undertaken in the deeper part of the open-pit shell to upgrade the current Inferred resources into the Indicated category. Besides increasing the resource base, a combined open-pit/underground project could increase grade throughput and reduce strip ratios with the higher grade, deeper mineral resources being mined more economically by underground mining methods, which could increase annual gold production and drive down operating costs. Minecon also recommends that further studies should be undertaken to assist in estimating historical depletions and depletions by recent artisanal mining.


Additional deposits and prospects occur close to Adumbi and have the potential to add mineral resources and feed to the Adumbi operation. Along trend from Adumbi, the Manzako and Kitenge deposits have Inferred Mineral Resources of 313,000 oz of gold (1.68 Mt grading 5.80 g/t Au) and remain open along strike and at depth. Further drilling is warranted on these two deposits

Additional feed for the Adumbi processing plant could also come from Loncor's 100 % owned high-grade Makapela deposit, where Indicated Mineral Resources of 2.20 Mt grading 8.66 g/t Au (614,200 oz of gold) and Inferred Mineral Resources of 3.22 Mt grading 5.30 g/t Au (549,600 oz of gold) have been outlined to date with the high-grade material being able to be transported economically to Adumbi.

Additional geotechnical investigations including drilling are recommended to optimise and potentially steepen pit slopes especially for the competent fresh BIF host rock which could reduce the strip ratio and thereby lower mining costs at Adumbi.

Additional metallurgical test work, including additional flotation and petrographic studies, is recommended to confirm recoveries and reagent consumptions, and to optimise the flowsheet design.


2 INTRODUCTION

Minecon Resources and Services Limited (Minecon) was engaged by Loncor Gold Inc. (Loncor) to prepare an independent Technical Report Summary (TRS) with respect to Loncor's Imbo Project in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).  The purpose of this TRS is to support the inclusion of the Imbo Project's Mineral Resource estimates in Loncor's Form 20-F annual report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 being filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).  This TRS conforms to the SEC's Modernized Property Disclosure Requirements for Mining Registrants as described in Subpart 229.1300 of Regulation S-K, Disclosure by Registrants Engaged in Mining Operations (S-K 1300) (including Item 601 (b)(96) Technical Report Summary).

2.1 QUALIFICATIONS OF QUALIFIED PERSONS

The relevant sections of this Technical Report were compiled by the Qualified Persons, as this term is defined in SK-1300 and in NI 43-101. The certificates of the Qualified Persons (QPs) are set out after the Date and Signature Page at the end of the report. A summary of their qualifications and responsible sections is given in Table 2.2.

Table 2.2: Summary of the Qualifications and Responsibilities of the QPs

QP

Qualification

Company

Site
Visit

Responsibility
(Section of Report)

Daniel Bansah

MSc (MinEx), MAusIMM (CP), FWAIMM, MGhIG

Minecon

Yes

Sections 1 to 5, and Sections 11 to 20

Christian Bawah

BSc (Hons) Geology, MBA (Finance) MAusIMM (CP), MMCC, FWAIMM, MGhIG

Minecon

Yes

Sections  6 to 10

Minecon used the additional drilling data from the drilling completed since the previous resource estimates of April 2021 to update the mineral resources on the Adumbi deposit.

Loncor is a Canadian gold exploration company with a substantial footprint in the DRC. Loncor's shares trade on the Toronto Stock Exchange. This report will be publicly filed by Loncor and may also be filed on Loncor's website.

2.2 TERMS OF REFERENCE AND PURPOSE

This technical report describes the Adumbi deposit (as well as other properties within the Imbo Project) in terms of its historical and recent exploration (infill and extension drilling), and summarises the results of the updated mineral resources completed on the Adumbi deposit. The resource modelling and estimations were restricted to the Adumbi deposit due to the significant implications of the drilling work carried out on the mineral resources of Adumbi.

Loncor is a Canadian gold exploration company focused on the Ngayu Greenstone Belt in the DRC. The Loncor team has over two decades of experience of operating in the DRC. Ngayu has numerous positive indicators based on the geology, artisanal activity, encouraging drill results and an existing gold resource base. The area is 220 km southwest of the Kibali Gold Mine, which is operated by Barrick Gold (Congo) SARL (Barrick). In 2020, Kibali produced 808,134 oz of gold at all-in sustaining costs of US$778/oz. 


Resolute Mining Limited (ASX/LSE: RSG) owns 23 % of the outstanding shares of Loncor and holds a pre-emptive right to maintain its pro rata equity ownership interest in Loncor following the completion by Loncor of any proposed equity offering.

The Imbo Project, in which the Adumbi and the two neighbouring deposits of Kitenge and Manzako are situated, is located within the Mambasa District of the Ituri Province in the northeastern region of the DRC, 250 km west of Bunia, the capital of the Ituri Province, and 225 km northwest of the city of Beni. The Adumbi base camp is located at latitude 1° 43' 58.76" N and longitude 27° 52' 4.01" E or 596,522 m E and 191,570 m N (WGS 84 UTM Zone 35N). Loncor holds an 84.68 % interest in the Imbo Project, and the balance is held by minority shareholders, including a 10 % free-carried interest owned by the DRC Government.

2.3 SOURCES OF INFORMATION

Minecon relied upon various reports and information provided by Loncor and other experts. The document references are summarised in Section 27 and include internal documents compiled by Loncor and the previous owner of the Imbo Project, Kilo Goldmines Ltd (Kilo) . Minecon particularly relied on the Roscoe Postle Associates Inc. (RPA) NI 43-101 Technical report of February 28, 2014, including its recommendations as well as technical information provided by Loncor on all the work carried out between 2014 to date by Loncor and previously by Kilo. In particular, the results of Loncor's 2020 to 2021 drilling programme have been utilised in developing the new estimates. Additionally, digital maps and information available in the public domain, such as company websites and public library documents, have been utilised.

Loncor openly provided a hard drive containing all material information which, to the best of its knowledge and understanding, is complete, accurate and true, having made due enquiry. Neither Minecon nor SENET is aware of any current or pending litigation or liabilities attached to the Imbo Project.

2.4 SCOPE OF THE OPINION

This report has been compiled to incorporate all currently available and material information that will enable the reader to make a reasoned and balanced judgement regarding the updated mineral resources of the Adumbi deposit.

The Qualified Persons involved in the preparation of this report are members in good standing with their respective professional institutions.

This work has been based upon technical information which has been supplied by Loncor and its contractors, and Minecon carried out independent due diligence on the information, where possible.

Minecon confirms that, to the best of their knowledge and having taken all reasonable care to ensure that such is the case, the information contained in this report is in accordance with the facts and contains no omission likely to affect its import.


The Mineral Resource estimates on Kitenge and Manzako were prepared by RPA in 2014. These estimates have not been updated.

2.5 QUALIFIED PERSONS DECLARATION AND STATEMENT OF INDEPENDENCE

This report has been compiled by Minecon. Minecon has extensive experience in preparing technical, competent/qualified persons', technical and valuation reports for mining and exploration companies. The information in this report is based on information compiled by the Qualified Persons: Daniel Bansah and Christian Bawah. The Qualified Persons' certificates are set out after the Date and Signature Page at the end of the report. The Qualified Persons have sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which they are undertaking to qualify as a Qualified Person, as defined in S-K 1300 and in NI 43-101.

Neither Minecon nor its staff and consulting engineers have, or have had, any interest in any of Loncor's projects capable of affecting their ability to give an unbiased opinion and have not received, and will not receive, any pecuniary or other benefits in connection with this assignment, other than normal geological, mining and environmental consulting fees. Neither Minecon nor its personnel involved in the preparation of this report have any material interest in Loncor or in any of the properties described herein.

Minecon was remunerated a fixed fee amount for the preparation of this report, with no part of their fees contingent on the conclusions reached or the content of this report. Except for these fees, Minecon has not received, and nor will they receive, any pecuniary or other benefit whether direct or indirect for or in connection with the preparation of this report.

2.6 PERSONAL INSPECTION

A site visit was carried out by Daniel Bansah, Chairman and Managing Director of Minecon, in September 2021, together with Minecon's environmental and social scientists. During the visit, Daniel spent time reviewing all the field geological activities undertaken on the Adumbi deposit, the geological logging and the sampling procedures, including the sampling preparation protocols carried out in the sample preparation laboratory. Christian Bawah was also on site for a period of 8 weeks from October to November 2020. Christian was accompanied by Peter Kersi, Minecon's Mineral Resources Manager, and a contributing engineer to this report. The following Minecon geologists and technical personnel: Bel Mapendo, chief geologist, Patient Zamakulu and Jean-Alain Chish, both senior geologists, and three of Minecon's laboratory technical and operational staff were on site for a period of 16 weeks, providing technical supervision and management of the 2020 to 2021 drilling programme and the management of the on-site sample preparation facility.

Tasks undertaken during the visit included a technical inspection of the site (proposed waste dump and other infrastructural sites including but not limited to six artisanal villages that could be impacted by the mine infrastructure), an inspection of the old drill core and a review of all the technical work carried out. In addition, the team reviewed the sampling and drill site protocols and security including QA/QC issues, and the on-site sample preparation facility.


Gordon France, Minecon's Database, GIS and IT Manager visited the Adumbi site for seven weeks from June to July 2021. The scope of work during the visit was to ensure that the Adumbi database was migrated onto a centralised data repository (the Century Database System).

The Minecon team worked in collaboration with Fabrice Matheys, Loncor's General Manager and geologist with +25 years of experience in the DRC and the African region.

3 RELIANCE ON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY LONCOR

Minecon has prepared this technical report and, in so doing, have utilised information provided by Loncor and its contractors as to its operational methods, conclusions, opinions, estimates and forecasts. Where possible, this information has been reviewed by independent sources with due enquiry in terms of all material issues that are a prerequisite to comply with S-K 1300 and NI 43-101.

The authors of this report are not qualified to provide extensive commentary on legal matters associated with Loncor's right to the Imbo Project. The authors have therefore relied on the legal opinion of MBM-Conseil of Kinshasa Gombe, DRC, dated June 8, 2020, which has provided certain information in preparing this report which, to the best of Loncor's knowledge and understanding, is complete, accurate and true, and Loncor acknowledges that Minecon has relied on such information, in preparing this report. No warranty or guarantee, be it express or implied, is made by the authors with respect to the completeness or accuracy of the said legal matters.

Except as provided under applicable Canadian and US securities laws, any use of this report by any third party is at that party's sole risk.


4 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION

4.1 LOCATION

The 122 km2 Imbo Project is located within the Mambasa Territory in the Ituri Province in the northeastern region of the DRC, 325 km northeast of the main cities of Kisangani and 225 km northwest of Beni (see Figure 4.1). The Imbo Project is found within Imbo Exploitation Permit PE 9691, which is valid until February 2039.

Bunia is the provincial capital of the Ituri Province and is situated approximately 260 km east by air from the Imbo Project. The village of Nia-Nia is approximately halfway between Beni and Kisangani and situated approximately 45 km south, by road, of the Adumbi base camp. The Adumbi base camp is located at latitude 1° 43' 58.76" N and longitude 27° 52' 4 01" E or 596,522 m E and 191,570 m N in WGS 84 UTM Zone 35N (see Figure 4.2 and Figure 4.3).


Figure 4.1: Locality Map of the Imbo Project in Africa


 

Figure 4.2: Location of Imbo Project within the DRC


Figure 4.3: Locality Map of Imbo Project


4.2 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP

Loncor is a publicly listed Canadian company which owns 84.68 % of the Imbo Exploitation Permit through its subsidiary Adumbi Mining S.A. (Adumbi Holdco). The minority shareholders hold 15.32 % (including the 10 % free-carried interest owned by the DRC Government).

4.3 LAND TENURE

In accordance with the Mining Regulations of the DRC, the surface area of an exploitation permit is measured in a unit known as a "carré" (in English, a square), which is defined as an area that measures 30 s on each side. The sides must be oriented north-south and east-west. A square carré has an area of 84.955 ha or 0.84955 km2. The word "quadrangle" is used as the unofficial English translation of the word carré.

4.4 IMBO EXPLOITATION PERMIT

Minecon has relied on a letter on land tenure, licences and permits dated June 8, 2020, from MBM-Conseil, one of the leading firms practising mining law in the DRC.

The Imbo Exploitation Licence (PE 9691) lies between X 594500 and 596000 and Y 191500 and 193100 (WGS 84 Zone 35N UTM coordinates). Table 4.1 lists the carré corners for the Imbo Exploitation Permit in longitude and latitude.

Table 4.1: Coordinates of the Imbo Exploitation Permit (PE9691)

Corner

Longitude

Latitude

1

27º 50' 00"

01º 41' 00"

2

27º 50' 00"

01º 47' 00"

3

27º 53' 00"

01º 47' 00"

4

27º 53' 00"

01º 44' 30"

5

27º 56' 00"

01º 44' 30"

6

27º 56' 00"

01º 44' 00"

7

27º 59' 00"

01º 44' 00"

8

27º 59' 00"

01º 41' 00"

The Imbo Licence covers a total area of 122 km2 (12,234 ha) and consists of 144 carrés.

The deposits and prospects on the Imbo Exploitation Permit, from northwest to southeast as shown in Figure 4.4, include the following:


Adumbi is currently the most explored deposit within the Imbo Permit. The Kitenge deposit is located approximately 4 km southeast from Adumbi. The Senegal prospect has been incorporated into the Kitenge deposit as it is the probable fault-offset northwest continuation along strike of Kitenge.

Manzako is located 1.5 km northeast of Kitenge. The previously named Lion prospect is now considered to be the southeastern portion of Manzako which incorporates a series of sub parallel shear structures.

The Monde Arabe and Vatican prospects are located east of Adumbi. Amuango is situated west of Adumbi, and the Imbo East prospects are located approximately 5 km southeast of Manzako.

Figure 4.4: Imbo Project Simplified Geology


4.5 PERMITS

Adumbi Holdco does not have a work permit précis; however, they have provided Minecon with a copy of a DRC "attestation de travail", which is a document confirming that the Imbo Exploitation Permit is in order.

4.6 ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITIES AND PERMITTING

DRC law imposes environmental obligations on an exploitation permit holder which must be performed during the exploitation of the mine. Pursuant to its decision dated April 2, 2013, the Directorate of Environment has approved the Environmental Impact Study (EIS) and Environmental Management Plan of the Project (EMPP). Furthermore, the Mitigation and Rehabilitation Plan (MRP) was approved on April 2, 2013.

4.7 SURFACE USAGE/LAND LEASE

Article 64 of the DRC 2002 Mining Code provides that the exploitation permit entitles its holder to the exclusive right to carry out, within the perimeter over which it has been granted, and during its term of validity, exploration, development, construction and exploitation works in connection with the mineral substances for which the permit has been granted, and associated substances if the holder has applied for an extension. According to Article 280 of the Mining Code, the holder or lessee must compensate for the damages caused by the works it carries out in connection with its mining activities, even if they are authorised.

In order to maintain the validity of the permit, the holder must pay the annual surface fees per quadrangle for each subsequent year before the end of the first quarter of the calendar year. The surface annual fees for the Imbo Permit have been paid for the year 2021.

Minecon is not aware of any environmental liabilities on the property. Loncor has all the required licences and permits to conduct the proposed work on the property. Minecon is not aware of any other significant factors, other than potential political and related safety risks described in Section 24 that may affect access, title, or the right or ability to perform the proposed work programme on the property.


5 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY

5.1 ACCESSIBILITY

The Imbo Project is located within the Mambasa Territory in the Ituri Province of the DRC. Bunia is the provincial capital of the Ituri Province and is situated approximately 260 km east by air from the Imbo Project. Located approximately 225 km by air southeast of the property, Beni is the nearest major population centre to the Imbo Project and has a population of approximately 230,000. Loncor maintains an administrative office in Beni. The city is a United Nations MONUSCO base and has a lateritic airstrip with scheduled internal flights to other towns such as Goma, Bunia, Isiro, Kisangani and Kinshasa. The Isiro airstrip is approximately 200 km by lateritic road to the Imbo Project. From Beni, the Imbo Project is accessible via 322 km of lateritic road to Nia-Nia, then to Village 47 (47 km north of Nia-Nia) and then 7 km via lateritic roads to the Adumbi base camp. On the property, access is via trails using Mine Mule utility and four-wheel drive vehicles in addition to motorcycles. Away from areas of habitation and artisanal activity, access is on foot through the dense forest growth.

The nearest international airport is located at Entebbe in western Uganda and linked by 440 km of paved road to the Kasindi Uganda-DRC border, followed by 80 km of unpaved lateritic roads to Beni. Entebbe has international scheduled flights to South Africa, Europe and Asia and is also linked to other African countries as well as the in-country towns of Kinshasa and Lubumbashi via Nairobi (Kenya). Ethiopian airlines have direct flights between Addis-Ababa and Goma. In addition, Entebbe is linked to the DRC border points of Arua, Mahagi and Kasindi by paved highway from the deep seaport of Mombasa (Kenya). Due to security issues and the poorly maintained roads in the DRC, the preferred road from Kampala to access the property is via Arua/Aru to Doko (Kibali Mine) to Faradje to Dungu and Isiro. Rail links between Mombasa and Kasese (Uganda) are being upgraded to standard gauge.

At Nia-Nia, 52 km southwest of the Imbo Project, there is a 1,200 m long grass-covered, laterite base airstrip which can accommodate propeller-driven, charter aircraft including medium-sized cargo planes.

The large operating gold mine of Kibali is located approximately 220 km by air northeast of the Imbo Project (see Figure 5.1).


Figure 5.1: Accessibility and Locality Map

5.2 CLIMATE

The climate is typically tropical and is characterised by a long, wet season and a short dry season of up to three months from mid-December to mid-March. The average annual rainfall is approximately 2,000 mm to 2,500 mm, with the highest rainfall generally occurring in October. Even in the driest months, rainfall totals more than 50 mm. Temperatures are also uniformly high throughout the year, and there is little diurnal variability, varying between 19 °C and 23 °C, with daily lows and highs of 16 °C and 33 °C, respectively. Humidity is high throughout the year (75 % to 99 %).

The climate facilitates exploration and mining activities all year round although exploration is more challenging during the wettest months as roads can deteriorate as they are poorly maintained. Torrential downpours of rain are experienced; however, they are not generally long lasting. The prevailing wind direction is from the southeast, with the maximum wind velocity and average daily wind velocities being relatively low, approximately 12 m/s and 0.5 m/s, respectively. Notwithstanding, the area can be hit with severe storms. Climatic conditions have generally not affected exploration activities.

5.3 LOCAL RESOURCES

The land around the Imbo Project is mainly equatorial rainforest, with very tall trees and grass. A few small villages exist around the project area. Some wild animals exist in and around the project area, but most have been hunted out by the local population. Natural water sources are abundant. Recent water wells drilled in the community and inside the Adumbi base camp have produced high yields, confirming the groundwater potential in the project area. The closest hydroelectric power station is situated near Kisangani, together with hydroelectric stations supplying power to Barrick/AngloGold Ashanti's Kibali mine. Isiro and Beni are potential sources of skilled manpower, but there is sufficient local unskilled manpower in the surroundings of Adumbi.


Regional migration from the colonial period has resulted in an amalgam of people from different ethnic Bantu groups, along with indigenous populations of pygmies, residing in areas immediately adjacent to and along key transit routes to the Imbo Project.

Within the immediate area of the property, there are several small villages that generally consist of fewer than 300 residents. The estimated total population within 10 km of the surrounding area is approximately 8,500 who rely on subsistence farming, organised artisanal mining, and harvesting of wood. These villages are accessed by motorcycle, bicycle and on foot via unmaintained roads and trails. The nearest community to the Adumbi base camp is the Adumbi village. In general, the project enjoys the support of local communities.

Exploration supplies are generally sourced within the country or further afield in Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania or South Africa. Wherever possible, food and consumables are locally sourced. Manpower at the Adumbi base camp is sourced from the local area. Technical manpower consists of senior staff expatriates supplied by Minecon in addition to Congolese staff. Security is maintained by a private security agency as well as contracted posted DRC police officers.

There is a significant local labour pool available for training and recruitment for any envisioned mining operation. The local area would however not be capable of supplying sufficient materials other than timber to support any potential mine-site infrastructure. Although some main roads dissect the area, upgraded and additional access roads, including bridges, will be required for any potential large-scale mining operations.

There is no electrical distribution system within the local area, and diesel generators and solar power are relied upon. There are a number of potential locations for hydroelectric development located within the Imbo Project area. In September 2021, Knight Piésold carried out an orientation visit to the sites, and based on a positive outlook, they have recommended detailed site investigation studies.

At the time of Minecon's site visit in September 2021, infrastructure at the Adumbi base camp included the following:


The power supply at the site is provided by diesel generators with solar power also used for lighting. Water is taken from a natural spring located just outside the camp boundary. For any future development activities, it will be necessary to build all-weather access roads and bridges as well as infrastructure for sufficient power and water supplies. The Imbo Project surface rights allow sufficient areas for potential processing plant sites, tailings storage areas, and waste disposal areas.

5.4 PHYSIOGRAPHY

The Imbo Project is located in the Ituri tropical rainforest within the upper reaches of the Congo River Basin. The project area topographically consists of an undulating terrain that varies from approximately 600 m above sea level to approximately 800 m above sea level. Most of the landscape is covered with dense evergreen forests with a closed canopy; however, the hills tend to have relatively steep slopes, and the valley floors within the areas of the linear hills are relatively narrow. In most places, the overburden (in general less than 1 m to approximately 50 m in thickness) is oxidised sandy clay or sandy clay loam, ranging in colour from reddish brown through ochre to yellowish brown. The soils are acidic in nature, and the layer of humus is thin.

The property is drained by numerous creeks and streams. Almost all the landscape belongs to the Congo Basin and is covered with a dense network of permanent watercourses which flow into the Upper Ituri and its main tributaries: the Epulu, Nepoko, Nduye, Lenda, Ebiena, and Ngayu rivers.

The Adumbi deposit is well situated for potential mining development as it is located on a topographical high amenable to low strip ratios for initial mining access. The Kitenge and Manzako deposits are located in areas of less relief.


6 HISTORY

This section summarises the work completed on the Imbo licence area and in particular the drilling activities completed on the Adumbi deposit since the last update. The history of past exploration activity on the Imbo Project was originally summarised in the RPA NI 43-101 technical report entitled "Technical Report on the Somituri Project, Imbo Licence, Democratic Republic of the Congo" and dated February 28, 2014 (available from SEDAR at www.sedar.com).

Kilo contracted the Royal Museum for Central Africa (RMCA) in December 2006 to carry out a compilation of the RMCA archives on gold in the region of the Adumbi Project in the DRC. The historical exploration and historical gold production on the Imbo Project area outlined below is therefore based on the 2007 RMCA compiled report (RMCA, 2007). Most of the data available to the RMCA was from prior to the 1960 independence of the DRC.

6.1 PRIOR OWNERSHIP

The mining rights for the mineral concessions in the Imbo Project area were held by the Société Internationale Forestière et Minière du Congo (FORMINIÈRE or FRM) from the 1920s to the late 1950s. The colonial state was co-owner of a 50 % stake in FRM, with the remainder held by American interests. The Société Minière de la Tele (SMT), a subsidiary of FRM, oversaw development and exploitation. Following political independence in 1960, ownership changed hands multiple times. A Zairian company, Zafrimines, held the property licences from April 17, 1987. In 1997, Rhodes Mining NL of Australia entered a joint venture agreement with Busico of Uganda (20 %) and the DRC (20 %) and held the property licences from May 17, 1997, until August 2, 1998, when Kilo acquired the property.

6.2 EXPLORATION HISTORY

Belgian prospectors were the first to discover gold on the Imbo Project in the early 1900s, with gold production focusing on alluvial deposits until the late 1930s. Primary gold mineralisation was later discovered in the bedrock of the alluvial zones and was exploited in shallow pits and trenches. This was later followed by mining from deep trenches and underground galleries. From the mid-1970s to mid-1980s, the French Geological Survey (BRGM) undertook geological investigations of the Imbo Project area. Artisanal miners in organised groups in recent years have been exploiting alluvial and eluvial deposits, as well as oxidised mineralisation from deep trenches (up to 10 m), and the underground sill drifts and pillars at Adumbi.

Highlights of the reported historical exploration include the following:



6.3 DEVELOPMENT AND PRODUCTION HISTORY

The first gold discoveries by Belgian prospectors on the Imbo Project occurred in the early 1900s, and early gold production was focused on alluvial deposits until the late 1930s. Gold was discovered in the bedrock of the alluvial zones, and these eluvial deposits were exploited in shallow pits and trenches. Primary gold deposits were later mined in deep trenches and underground galleries.

Kilo, via its agreement with Somituri SPRL, was granted the exploration licences for the project area in February 2009, and in September 2019, Loncor acquired Kilo.

Commercial alluvial gold production on the Imbo Project was undertaken from 1927 to 1951 on the Amuango River. The Amuango River covers the drainage basin from the west side of Adumbi to the area of Bagbaie, located north of Adumbi. Eluvial gold was also exploited over Adumbi Hill, and Kilo believes that this was also considered part of Amuango. The alluvial M'Boro-Adumbi and Amuango exploitations were made in the hydrographical system on the slopes of a ridge of which Adumbi Hill is the summit. A total of 83,000 oz (2.581 t) of gold were exploited during the period (see Table 6.1).

Table 6.1: Summary of Imbo Project Historical Alluvial Gold Production (1927 to 1951)

Deposit

Contained Gold
(t)

Contained Gold
(oz)

M'Boro-Adumbi

1.334

42,800

Amuango

0.846

27,200

Amuango

0.059

2,000

Maiepunji

0.342

11,000

Total

2.581

83,000

NOTES:

1. Sourced from the Royal Museum for Central Africa (RMCA, 2007).

2. This estimate is considered to be historical in nature and should not be relied upon; however, it does give an
      indication of the mineralisation on the property.

3. Numbers might not add up due to rounding.

From 1938 to 1955, surface and underground mining was also carried out on the Kitenge-Maiepunji and Adumbi mines. When underground mining began in 1943, a processing facility was built, "Usine de Kitenge", and commissioned in 1944. By the early 1950s, production had declined rapidly at Kitenge-Maiepunji due to the lack of defined mineral reserves. By 1955, production had declined at the Adumbi mine due to metallurgical challenges, the depth of the mine coupled with lack of energy for milling operations, and poor recovery in the amalgamation mills resulting in exorbitant processing costs. It is reported that a total of 86,400 oz (2.688 t) of gold was exploited at the Kitenge-Maiepunji mines between 1938 and 1955 (see Table 6.2). In addition, 177,500 oz (5.520 t) of gold was exploited from the surface and underground workings of the Adumbi mine between 1952 and 1959 (see Table 6.3). It is reported that Adumbi-Bagbaie closed in 1959, prior to the political independence. Recent exploitation has been carried out by artisanal mining operations, which have mined and recovered gold from most of the easily accessible processable gold.


Table 6.2: Summary of Kitenge-Maiepunji Mines Historical Gold Production
(1938 to 1955)

Type

Mined
(t)

Gold Grade
(g/t)

Contained Gold
(t)

Contained Gold
(oz)

Surface and Underground

297

9.05

2.688

86,400

Total

297

9.05

2.688

86,400

NOTES:

1. Sourced from the Royal Museum for Central Africa (RMCA, 2007).

2. This estimate is considered to be historical in nature and should not be relied upon; however, it does give an             
      indication of the mineralisation on the property.

3. Numbers might not add up due to rounding.

Table 6.3: Summary of Adumbi Mine Historical Gold Production (1952 to 1959)

Ore Type

Mined
(t)

Gold Grade
(g/t)

Contained Gold
(t)

Contained Gold
(oz)

Underground Quartz Veins

445

11.37

5.058

162,600

Surface Eluvial and Quarry

161

2.87

0.462

14,900

Total

606

9.11

5.520

177,500

NOTES:

1. Sourced from the Royal Museum for Central Africa (RMCA, 2007).

2. This estimate is considered to be historical in nature and should not be relied upon; however, it does give an
      indication of the mineralisation on the property.

3. Numbers might not add up due to rounding.

It is noted in historical documentation that there was a significant drop in production from 1955 as a result of processing only veins coupled with metallurgical challenges (non-amalgamable gold in less altered rocks). BRGM also reported that the refractory gold content in tailings increased with the mining depth, which corresponds with the reported increasing tailings grade (from 2.3 g/t Au in 1954 to 5.7 g/t Au in 1957). BRGM reported that Adumbi-Bagbaie closed in 1959, just prior to political independence, due to lack of energy for milling operations, exorbitant processing costs, and poor recovery in the amalgamation mills.

The old Belgian workings at Manzako were extended to 2.2 km following field activities. Thus, the northern continuation of the workings was extended by 600 m to the northwest of Drillhole SMDD0002. The old workings indicate the presence of multiple parallel mineralised zones, which were exploited by the Belgians and more recently by artisanal miners. In the southeast of the deposit, the mineralised zones are between 80 m and 150 m apart; however, in the northwest (based on the evidence of the old workings), they appear to be only 20 m apart.

The Kitenge old workings focused on shear zone hosted auriferous quartz vein(s) approximately 1 m to 2 m wide.


6.4 HISTORICAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES

In a 1984 study, BRGM estimated the Adumbi deposit potential to be 1.9 Mt at 19 g/t Au, equivalent to approximately 20 t or 643,000 oz of gold. This estimate was based on an extension of the main 5 m wide vein in a strike length of 900 m (700 m exploited on Adumbi Hill and 200 m to the north towards Bagbaie), in addition to a vertical extension of approximately 200 m below the water table. Minecon notes that this estimate pre-dates the 2014 NI 43-101, cannot be relied upon, and is quoted for historical purposes only.

In 1988, Bugeco concluded that the remaining mineral resources in the Adumbi "main zone", after mine closure in 1959, were approximately 929,880 oz of gold. Bugeco further concluded that an additional 5 t of gold (approximately 160,750 oz) could be hosted outside the main zone within the remaining alluvium and other adjacent mineralised horizons at Adumbi. The total Bugeco mineral resource was estimated at 1,090,630 oz of gold as presented in Table 6.4. Minecon notes that this estimate pre-dates the 2014 NI 43-101, cannot be relied upon, and is quoted for historical purposes only.

Table 6.4: Adumbi Historical Mineral Resources (1988)

Zone

Type

Tonnage
(t)

Grade
(Au g/t)

Contained Gold
(oz)

Main

Oxide

1,000,000

9.8

315,050

 

Sulphide

2,225,000

8.5

614,830

Main Subtotal

 

 

929,880

Outside

 

 

 

160,750

Total

 

 

 

1,090,630

NOTES:

1. Sourced from the Royal Museum for Central Africa (RMCA, 2007) and the Bugeco Report 1988 Mission (Bugeco, 1988).

2. Minecon notes that this estimate pre-dates the 2014 NI 43-101, cannot be relied upon, and is quoted for historical purposes only.

3. A qualified person has not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves.

4. Minecon is not treating the historical estimate as current mineral resources or mineral reserves.

5. Numbers might not add up due to rounding.

It is assumed that recent artisanal mining operations have recovered most of the easily processable gold.

In April 2012, The Mineral Corporation (TMC) (which had been engaged by Kilo to carry out geological modelling and updated resource estimates of the Adumbi deposit) completed an independent NI 43-101 technical report on the Adumbi deposit. At a cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t Au, TMC outlined an Inferred Resource of 1.87 Moz (35.66 Mt grading 1.63 g/t Au) (see Table 6.5).


Table 6.5: Adumbi Historical Mineral Resources (April 2012)

Material Type

Tonnage
(t)

Grade
(g/t Au)

Contained Au
(Moz)

Oxide

12,310,549

1.61

0.64

Transition

4,763,163

1.66

0.25

Sulphide

18,581,569

1.63

0.98

Total

35,655,280

1.63

1.87

In February 2014, independent consultants RPA completed for Kilo an independent NI 43-101 technical report on the Imbo Project and estimated 1.675 Moz (20.78 Mt grading 2.5 g/t Au) of Inferred Mineral Resources on the three separate deposits of Adumbi, Kitenge and Manzako (see Table 6.6).

Table 6.6: Mineral Resource Estimate of Adumbi, Kitenge and Manzako Deposits
(Effective Date: December 31, 2013)

Deposit

Tonnage
(Mt)

Gold Grade
(g/t Au)

Contained Gold
(Moz)

Adumbi

19.11

2.20

1.362

Kitenge

0.91

6.60

0.191

Manzako

0.77

5.00

0.122

Total

20.78

2.50

1.675

An assessment of the 2017 drilling and the results of various technical reviews by Minecon (which had been engaged by Loncor) resulted in Minecon outlining 2.19 Moz (28.97 Mt at 2.35 g/t Au) of Inferred Mineral Resources constrained within a US$1,500/oz pit shell at Adumbi (see Table 6.7). To allow Minecon to compare its estimates with those of the RPA 2014 model, a block cut-off of 0.9 g/t Au was applied to the model.

Table 6.7: Inferred Mineral Resource of the Adumbi Deposit
(Effective Date: April 17, 2020)

Material Type Tonnage
(t)
Grade
(g/t Au)
Contained Gold
(oz)
Oxide 3,820,000 2.44 300,000
Transitional 3,320,000 2.69 290,000
Sulphide 21,820,000 2.28 1,600,000
TOTAL 28,970,000 2.35 2,190,000
NOTE: Numbers might not add up due to rounding.

The Inferred Mineral Resources for the Adumbi, Manzako and Kitenge deposits (Imbo Project) as at April 17, 2020, totalled 2,503,000 oz of gold (30,650,000 t grading 2.54 g/t Au) and are summarised in Table 6.8. For the purposes of this report, no modelling work was carried out on the Kitenge and Manzako deposits by Minecon. Reference was therefore made to the RPA 2014 technical report on the estimates reported for Kitenge and Manzako.


Table 6.8: Inferred Mineral Resources for the Imbo Project
(Effective Date: April 17, 2020)

Deposit

Tonnage
(t)

Grade
(g/t Au)

Contained Gold
(oz)

Adumbi

28,970,000

2.35

2,190,000

Kitenge

910,000

6.60

191,000

Manzako

770,000

5.00

122,000

TOTAL

30,650,000

2.54

2,503,000

NOTE: Numbers might not add up due to rounding.

By April 2021, six additional core holes totalling 2,557.25 m had been drilled, with the initial focus in areas within the pit shell where insufficient drilling had been undertaken. The significant intersections obtained from this drilling programme on the Adumbi deposit resulted in the open-pit Inferred Mineral Resources increasing by 44 % to 3.15 Moz of gold as of April 27, 2021.

Table 6.9 summarises this Adumbi Inferred Mineral Resource based on an in-situ block cut-off at 0.68 g/t Au for oxide and transition materials and 0.72 g/t Au for fresh material, and constrained within a US$1,500/oz optimised pit shell.

Table 6.9: Adumbi Deposit Inferred Mineral Resource by Material Type
(Effective Date: April 27, 2021)

Material Type

Tonnage
(t)

Grade
(g/t Au)

Contained Gold
(oz)

Oxide

4,623,000

2.24

333,000

Transition

3,674,000

2.53

299,000

Fresh

33,019,000

2.38

2,521,000

TOTAL

41,316,000

2.37

3,153,000

NOTE: Numbers might not add up due to rounding.

This mineral resource assessment was undertaken by Loncor's independent geological consultants Minecon. The updated estimate for Adumbi was based on the additional drilling and a review of the Adumbi deposit including remodelling, grade estimation, and considering the CIM requirement for mineral resources to have "reasonable prospects for economic extraction".

As a result of the increased mineral resource at Adumbi, the total Inferred Mineral Resource of the Imbo Project as of April 27, 2021, stood at 3.466 Moz of gold (42.996 Mt grading 2.51 g/t Au) and is summarised in Table 6.10.


Table 6.10: Inferred Mineral Resource for the Imbo Project
(Effective Date: April 27, 2021)

Deposit

Tonnage
(t)

Grade
(g/t Au)

Contained Gold
(oz)

Adumbi

41,316,000

2.37

3,153,000

Kitenge

910,000

6.60

191,000

Manzako

770,000

5.00

122,000

TOTAL

42,996,000

2.51

3,466,000

NOTE: Numbers might not add up due to rounding.



7 GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND MINERALISATION

7.1 REGIONAL GEOLOGY

Most of the northeastern corner of the DRC is underlain by an Archean Basement, called the Upper-Congo Granitoid Complex or Bomu Craton, formerly known as the Upper-Zaïre Granitoid Massif. This basement is covered by Lower and Upper Kibalian rocks, Neo-Archean in age, that consist of volcano-sedimentary formations with intercalations of quartzites and itabirites (banded iron formation (BIF)). The Kibalian rocks have been metamorphosed to greenschist facies and, in the project area, constitute the greenstone belt. The Neoproterozoic Lindian Supergroup occurs to the south of the area and consists of a sedimentary sequence with a thickness of more than 2,500 m. The rock types in the sequence are mainly arkoses, sandstones, quartzites, shales and conglomerates (see Figure 7.1).

The Upper Congo Granitoid Complex constitutes, together with associated metasediments and volcanics, the western part of the Nyanza-Kibali granite-greenstone terrain, which extends from northern Tanzania into the Central African Republic. The greenstone terrain is hosted within the Kibalian series, which outcrops in numerous zones surrounded by granitoids, the most important (i.e. Moto, Kilo, Mambasa, Ngayu and Isiro) are more than 100 km in strike length. They can be distinguished both by their shape and their lithological composition. Some of these zones constitute narrow belts (less than 10 km wide, 30 km to 60 km in length) made up of units which are isoclinally folded along subvertical axial planes and sub-horizontal fold axes. Others are more or less isometric and show a synclinorial tectonic style. The isoclinally folded unit possesses a metavolcanic to metasediment volumetric ratio (v:s) of approximately 1, that of the isometric exceeds three (up to 10).

An Upper Kibalian (v:s of approximately 1) overlies a Lower Kibalian (high v:s) in the belts of Moto and Ngayu. By extrapolating this relationship to other zones, it can be concluded that two generations of greenstones exist; the one forming narrow bands, rich in sedimentary rocks, belongs to the younger of the two generations. This distinction is also supported by geochronology. The Lower Kibalian of Ngayu and Moto is intruded by 2.8 Ga old tonalities and the Upper Kibalian by 2.45 Ga old granites. Most volcanics of the Lower Kibalian are akin to oceanic tholeiites while those from the upper division contain distinct andesitic members together with less typical tholeiites. Nowhere has the Lower Kibalian series been observed to be associated with high-grade gneissic rocks likely to represent their basement. The Upper Kibalian series, on the other hand, is typically associated both with the tonalite-Lower Kibalian association and with the gneissic series (i.e. the West-Nile Gneissic Complex), suggesting a different geodynamic setting for the two series.

The Ruwenzori tectonic episode (ca 2 Ga) strongly affected the southern flank of the Upper Congo Granitoid Complex, which resulted in the formation of shear belts cutting through the Kibalian zones, and in the cataclasis of the associated granitoids.

In the region bordering the Western Rift, NNE-SSW trending shear belts, ca 950 Ma, strongly reactivated parts of the West-Nile gneissic Complex. Parallel trending belts cutting through the Kibalian zone of the Kilo belt are probably linked to the same event. The tectonic episodes of ca 790 Ma and 700 Ma affected the northern flank of the Upper Congo Granitoid Complex and consequently the Kibalian zone of Moto. By reactivating the late-Archean suture between the West-Nile Complex and the Congo Granitoid Complex, these episodes contributed to the present shape of the Moto zone.


Gold is the only commodity to have been extracted commercially in the Ngayu belt. Several years ago, Rio Tinto assessed the BIF as a potential source of iron ore, but although haematite-rich zones of good grade were reportedly drilled, tonnage was below the economic requirement. Diamonds are recovered by artisanal miners from the Ngayu River; the source of the stones is unknown but is probably outside the area under discussion. No other mineral occurrences of potential significance are known.

The majority of the gold occurrences within the Ngayu belt are located close to the contact of the BIF. Historically, only two deposits were exploited on a large scale by previous owners, namely Yindi and Adumbi.

Several styles of gold mineralisation have been identified in the Ngayu belt and are summarised below:

Sulphidation of the BIF by fluids utilising nearby cross-cutting and parallel structures, such as thrusts and shears e.g., Yindi BIF-hosted mineralisation and Nagasa Anomaly 1. This style of mineralisation has the potential to form deposits of very large size, e.g., Geita in Tanzania.

Shear zones resulting in auriferous sheeted quartz veins and veinlets developing mainly parallel to the foliation and forming packages over widths of up to 40 m, often with disseminated mineralisation between the veins, e.g., Itali, Mondarabe.

Artisanal mining of weathered gold mineralisation preserved as elluvial or colluvial material is widespread throughout the belt, particularly in the Imva Fold area and Anguluku.


Figure 7.1: Main Gold Projects and Prospects within the Ngayu Greenstone Belt

7.2 LOCAL GEOLOGY

The Imbo Project is located within the Upper Kibalian represented by the greenstone belt made up of metasediments and metavolcanics of greenschist facies, including the prominent BIF, which forms prominent ridges throughout the Ngayu Greenstone Belt.

Intruding all the basement formations are intrusive rocks consisting of possibly Late Proterozoic dolerite/diabase and doleritic gabbro and diorite. Quartz veins are predominantly associated with the Upper Kibalian. The Proterozoic Lindian metasedimentary rocks unconformably overlie the Kibalian rocks. Palaeozoic, Cenozoic, and Quaternary metasediments and alluvial sediments are locally present within the project area. The Karoo Formation comprises black shales, eluvial and alluvial deposits. Post-Karoo rocks are essentially represented by lateritic cuirasse. The simplified geology of the Imbo area is illustrated in Figure 7.2.

Gold is associated with sulphide mineralisation within the Archean Kibalian Formation of the Ngayu Greenstone Belt. Gold generally occurs with quartz veins; host rocks to the quartz veins include BIF, metasedimentary, and tuffaceous rocks.

Within the Imbo Project area, there is a strong association between gold mineralisation and the presence of the BIF, the BIF either constituting the host rock (e.g., Adumbi) or forming a significant part of the local stratigraphy in the Imbo Project area.


The BIF forms both physical and chemical traps for mineralising hydrothermal fluids as follows:

When interlayered with incompetent lithologies such as the metasedimentary schists and volcaniclastics, the BIF constitutes relatively hard rock, more likely to develop brittle fracturing than the more ductile surrounding rocks. Also, shearing may preferentially take place in the schists, on the contact with the BIF. These fractures and shears can act as channel ways, focusing hydrothermal fluids into the chemically reactive BIF.

When interlayered with competent rocks such as massive basalts, the BIF units (especially if relatively thin like those at Makapela) may act as zones of weakness, along which shear and faults may propagate. Again, the tectonic fabric within the BIF can facilitate the flow of hydrothermal fluids.

The iron-rich BIF is a chemically reactive rock, the main interaction with hydrothermal fluids involving the reduction of magnetite to pyrite, resulting in the precipitation of gold.

Mineralisation on the Imbo Project (PE9691) is known to occur at Bagbaie (referred to as Adumbi North), Adumbi, Kitenge, Manzako, Monde Arabe, Maipinji and Vatican (see Figure 7.2)

Figure 7.2: Imbo Project - Simplified Geology


7.3 PROPERTY GEOLOGY

Gold occurrences on the Imbo Project are hosted within quartz veins in the sheared Upper Kibalian Formation, which consist of chemical metasedimentary units including the BIF, clastic metasedimentary rocks assigned the field name "greywacke", and mafic volcanic flows. Adumbi, Kitenge and Manzako are the three main deposits within the Imbo Project with mineral resources and are separately discussed below.

7.3.1 Adumbi

Adumbi is currently the most explored deposit within the Imbo Project. Adumbi forms a topographic high (Adumbi Hill) and incorporates the Canal prospect, which is the southeastern continuation of Adumbi.

The published geological map and historical reports indicate that the Adumbi deposit is underlain by Upper Kibalian rocks with the dominant lithologies including a well bedded BIF unit, tuffaceous metasedimentary rocks (referred to as greywacke), black shale, and a mafic intrusion.

Based on examined drillholes, the rocks at Adumbi mainly comprise a subvertical sequence of metamorphosed clastic sediments (pelites, siltstones and greywacke) interbedded with units of BIF of varying width. The grade of metamorphism is probably lower greenschist facies, and the clastic units are petrographically classified as schists. Foliation is usually clearly defined in hand specimens although sedimentary features such as bedding are frequently preserved.

7.3.1.1 Lithological Units

Recent drilling and re-logging of the core at the Adumbi deposit display five distinct geological domains with the BIF unit attaining a thickness of up to 130 m in the central part (see Figure 7.3 and Figure 7.4). From northeast to southwest, these are as follows:

1. Hanging Wall Schists: dominantly quartz carbonate schist, with interbedded carbonaceous schist.

2. Upper BIF Sequence: an interbedded sequence of BIF and chlorite schist, 45 m to 130 m in thickness.

3. Carbonaceous Marker: a distinctive 3 m to 17 m thick unit of black carbonaceous schist with pale argillaceous bands.

4. Lower BIF Sequence: BIF interbedded with quartz carbonate, carbonaceous and/or chlorite schist in a zone 4 m to 30 m in thickness.

5. Footwall Schists: similar to the hanging wall schist sequence.

There is a higher-grade zone of gold mineralisation termed the "replaced rock zone" (RP zone) associated with alteration and structural deformation that has completely destroyed the primary host lithological fabric. The RP zone occurs in the lower part of the Upper BIF package and in the Lower BIF package, and transgresses the Carbonaceous Marker, located between the Upper and Lower BIF packages, both along strike and down dip (see Figure 7.4).


Figure 7.3: Adumbi Deposit - Geological Map

Figure 7.4: Adumbi Deposit - Geological Cross Section


Further details on the individual rock types are as follows:

7.3.1.1.1 Quartz Carbonate Schist

Fine- to medium-grained, pale grey to pale greenish grey schist, comprising subrounded, dark grey quartz grains up to 1.5 mm (probably remnant clastic grains) in a finer-grained matrix of quartz, white mica and carbonate (possibly ankerite). The carbonate forms irregular, elongated grains orientated parallel to the foliation. It is the most abundant rock in the Adumbi sequence.

Pyrite often occurs as irregularly distributed subhedral to anhedral crystals up to 10 mm across. In the core observed to date, the lack of associated hydrothermal alteration and the absence of pressure shadows and evidence of rotation indicate that the pyrite formed as porphyroblasts after the main deformation event. However, the technical report prepared by RPA refers to pressure shadows and rotated grains, so the possibility of earlier (possibly diagenetic) pyrite formation cannot be ruled out.

It is interpreted that the rock was probably originally a poorly sorted, calcareous, muddy, fine-grained arenite, possibly a greywacke.

7.3.1.1.2 Carbonaceous Schist

Very fine-grained, dark grey to black schist, consisting of carbonaceous material and (according to petrographic data) varying amounts of white mica. Quartz is rare. Banding due to variations in the proportion of white mica reflects the bedding in the original sediment. The nature of the carbonaceous material was not determined petrographically but based on samples of similar material from elsewhere in the Ngayu belt, it is probably amorphous carbon rather than graphite. The rock was probably originally a black shale formed in a deep marine environment. Pyrite porphyroblasts similar to those in the quartz carbonate schist, are irregularly distributed. Pyrite also occurs locally as very finely disseminated grains. The carbonaceous schist occurs as robust units up to several metres in width, but more frequently as thinner units interbanded with quartz-sericite schist. The carbonaceous schist however also occurs (a) with white to pale grey siliceous bands, which probably represent recrystallised chert, and (b) interbanded with whitish, soft, very fine-grained argillaceous material, which could possibly represent thin layers of volcanic ash.

7.3.1.1.3 Banded Iron Formation (BIF)

The BIF consists of black, fine-grained magnetite-rich bands alternating with white to pale buff chert. The width of the magnetite bands is variable, ranging from laminae only a few millimetres wide, to bands up to about 10 cm across.

The BIF at Adumbi is distinctly different to that seen elsewhere in the Ngayu belt, which comprises either (a) a thinly bedded rock, with magnetite laminae separated by quartz-rich bands of similar width, or (b) a more massive magnetite-rich rock with poorly defined banding.


7.3.1.1.4 Chlorite Schist

A fine-grained rock, superficially similar to the carbonaceous schist in hand specimens, but with a dark greenish tinge and a lack of bedding, that occurs interbanded with the BIF in the central part of the deposit, rarely forming units greater than 3 m in thickness. It forms more massive units up to 14 m in width, but is locally finely interbedded with quartz carbonate schist, indicating a sedimentary rather than volcanic origin. In places the chlorite schist is distinctly magnetic, probably due to the presence of finely disseminated magnetite.

7.3.1.1.5 Banded Chert

This rock type is not widespread, occurring in the Canal zone in the SE of the prospect, in units up to 4 m in width. It superficially resembles the BIF, but the dark bands comprise fine-grained clastic sedimentary material instead of chemically precipitated magnetite.

7.3.1.1.6 Dolerite

Mafic intrusive rock, massive (not deformed), dark greenish in colour, fine- to medium-grained with localised irregular veins and veinlets of quartz carbonate.

7.3.1.2 Interpretation of the Adumbi BIF Package

The gold mineralisation at Adumbi is directly related to the chemical and physical properties of the BIF package. The geological interpretation from the drill intersections demonstrates that the mineralised BIF increases in thickness with depth (see Figure 7.5). The above thus confirms the existence of significant underground potential at Adumbi. Further drilling is recommended to unearth this potential.

Figure 7.5: Adumbi Deposit - Interpretation of BIF Package


7.3.2 Kitenge

The Kitenge deposit is situated approximately 4 km southeast of the Adumbi deposit, and it may be a strike extension of the shear zone structure that hosts the Adumbi deposit but left laterally fault offset approximately 500 m to the northeast (see Figure 7.2). The Senegal prospect has been incorporated into the Kitenge deposit as it is the probable fault offset northwest continuation along strike of Kitenge.

7.3.2.1 Lithological Units

Lithological units within the Kitenge deposit area have been classified into three principal lithological packages (see Figure 7.6) as follows:

Figure 7.6: Kitenge Deposit - Surface Geological Map


The main rock type at the Kitenge deposit is quartz carbonate schist, identical to that at Adumbi. Bands of carbonaceous schist up to a few metres in width occur in places.

A summary of the rock types occurring in the re-logged Kitenge holes is as follows:

Except for the quartz porphyry, the rest are as described under the Adumbi lithologies (see 7.3.1.1).

Quartz porphyry is a greenish grey, medium-grained intrusive igneous rock composed mainly of quartz phenocrysts embedded in a fine siliceous matrix. This unit is not widespread and was only intersected in one hole (SKDD0028) located in the SE of the central part of the drilled area in the Kitenge deposit. The quartz porphyry occurs as a narrow unit with an approximate width of 40 cm. A well-defined fine-grained chill margin is developed at the quartz porphyry contacts with the country rock and below it is extensive ankerite alteration, bleaching and quartz veining in association with strong shearing and isolated low-grade mineralisation. Although it has not been established to have associations with gold mineralisation at Kitenge, its presence in association with shearing and the aforementioned alteration might be of geological importance as elsewhere, intrusive rocks have been recorded to be a source of hydrothermal fluids associated with gold mineralisation.

7.3.2.2 Hydrothermal Alteration

Hydrothermal alteration at Kitenge is associated with the shear zones. The alteration comprises pervasive bleaching, with chlorite preferentially developed along the shear planes. Quartz veins are also present and are usually developed parallel to the shear fabric. They are typically white or grey, glassy, and vary from veinlets to robust veins up to 1.90 m in width. Disseminated euhedral crystals of dolomite are also present in the alteration zones, usually associated with quartz veins.

Sulphides are irregularly distributed as stringers and disseminated grains, and consist of pyrite, arsenopyrite and rare pyrrhotite. The sulphides occur in variable proportions and constitute up to 20 % of the rock.

The main styles of hydrothermal alteration at the Kitenge deposit are associated with clearly defined zones of shearing and comprise the following:


7.3.3 Manzako

The Manzako deposit is located approximately 1.5 km northeast of Kitenge (see Figure 7.2). This includes the previously named Lion prospect, which is now considered to be the southeastern portion of Manzako and incorporates a series of subparallel shear structures.

7.3.3.1 Lithological Units

The main lithological unit within the Manzako deposit is basalt, with some dolerite intrusive (see Figure 7.7).

Figure 7.7: Manzako Deposit - Geological Map

7.3.3.1.1 Basalt

Two categories of the basalt unit identified are as follows:


7.3.3.1.2 Dolerite

The dolerite is dark green, fine to medium grained, and is locally weakly magnetic. In places, the dolerite has sharp contacts with the basalt, but elsewhere the contacts are gradational. Where the contacts are gradational, the dolerite probably represents the more slowly cooled, central parts of thicker basalt flows, rather than intrusive bodies. This is a common feature at the basalt-hosted Makapela deposit in the north of the Ngayu belt. The main occurrence of dolerite is in the SE of the deposit where it appears to be intrusive with a general N-S orientation and is traceable for approximately 200 m along strike (see Figure 7.6). The average width of the dolerite is approximately 25 m.

The Manzako mineralised structures appear to be fairly uniform in strike and dip and are subparallel to the controlling structures at Adumbi and Kitenge, i.e. approximately parallel to the lithological strike. The detailed work on the RP zone at Adumbi has, however, shown that the main structure does undulate and cross-cut strike at acute angles.

7.3.3.2 Hydrothermal Alteration

The main styles of hydrothermal alteration noted in the re-logged drillholes at Manzako are associated with clearly defined zones of shearing and comprise the following:

7.4 MINERALISATION

Gold mineralisation at Adumbi is generally associated with quartz and quartz-carbonate pyrite ± pyrrhotite ± arsenopyrite veins in a BIF horizon.

In the central part of the Adumbi deposit, three main zones of gold mineralisation are present (see Figure 7.3 and Figure 7.4):

1. Within the Lower BIF Sequence

2. In the lower part of the Upper BIF Sequence (Zones 1 and 2 are separated by the Carbonaceous Marker, which is essentially unmineralised)

3. A weaker zone in the upper part of the Upper BIF Sequence

Gold mineralisation at Kitenge is associated with zones of shearing with strong quartz veining, higher grades being associated with relatively abundant sulphides and particularly the presence of arsenopyrite (see Figure 7.8).


Figure 7.8: Kitenge Deposit - Cross Section through Drillholes SKDD0002 and SKDD0025

Gold mineralisation at Manzako is associated with quartz veining within shear zones, with associated sulphides especially arsenopyrite, and pervasive haematite. The continuity of mineralisation along strike and down dip is erratic; the best developed zones (see Figure 7.9) are the following:


Figure 7.9: Manzako Deposit - Cross Section through Drillholes SMDD0017 and SNDD0038

7.4.1 2020 to 2021 Drill Assay Results

The significant mineralised intercepts from LADD001, LADD003, LADD004, LADD006, LADD007, LADD008, LADD009, LADD012, LADD013, LADD014, LADD015, LADD016, LADD017, LADD018, LADD019, LADD021, LADD022, LADD023, LADD024 and LADD025 are presented in Table 7.1.

Table 7.1: Significant Mineralised Intercepts from Completed Drillholes.

Borehole
Identification (BHID)

From
(m)

To
(m)

Intercept Width
(m)

Grade
(g/t Au)

LADD001

202.58

223.35

20.77

1.72

LADD001

231.27

237.17

5.9

1.89

LADD001

251.27

258.6

7.33

5.8

LADD001

295.25

298.7

3.45

2.1

LADD001

301.62

321.95

20.33

2.47

LADD001

Including 317.11

321.95

4.84

5.4

LADD003

224.55

235

10.45

3.88

LADD003

253.5

286.8

33.3

3.25




Borehole
Identification (BHID)

From
(m)

To
(m)

Intercept Width
(m)

Grade
(g/t Au)

LADD003

Including 253.50

259.2

5.7

7

LADD003

Including 277.73

286.8

9.07

5.11

LADD004

429

457

28

3.26

LADD004

Including 432.00

436.9

4.90

6.96

LADD004

Including 450.62

454.15

3.53

8.3

LADD004

473.8

478.4

4.60

2.07

LADD004

505.85

526.15

20.3

2.83

LADD004

Including 506.85

513.4

6.55

4.64

LADD004

Including 523.85

526.15

2.30

7.25

LADD006

299.37

302.25

2.88

2.64

LADD006

308

309

1

21.2

LADD006

322.1

337.3

15.2

1.67

LADD006

353.35

357.85

4.5

3.25

LADD007

99.95

107.8

7.85

1.45

LADD007

540.62

596.05

55.43

2.76

LADD007

Including 583.60

596.05

12.45

8.11

LADD007

607.9

611.27

3.37

4.61

LADD008

235.05

278.15

43.1

1.68

LADD008

291.8

298.9

7.1

1.34

LADD008

305.15

305.93

0.78

21.8

LADD008

323.8

338.78

14.98

3.62

LADD008

Including 335.75

338.78

3.09

13.28

LADD009

559.76

564.76

5

3.17

LADD009

581.9

614.05

32.15

6.17

LADD009

Including 599.05

600.51

1.46

94.77

LADD009

629.56

644.92

15.36

3.73

LADD009

Including 632

637.89

5.89

6.56

LADD009

650.5

657.95

7.45

1.48

LADD012

784.35

797.8

13.45

3.63

LADD012

Including 784.35

786.35

2

9.56

LADD012

806.3

810.35

4.05

4.73

LADD013

394.06

401.1

7.04

2.68

LADD013

418.65

438.65

20

4.21

LADD013

Including 419.75

430.75

11

6.91

LADD013

452.3

469.6

17.3

2.48

LADD013

Including 457.35

465.55

8.2

4.71

LADD014

670

681.8

11.8

2.97

LADD014

Including 670

673.53

3.53

6.44

LADD015

24.43

31.5

6.07

1.77

LADD016

672.85

680.94

8.09

1.9




Borehole
Identification (BHID)

From
(m)

To
(m)

Intercept Width
(m)

Grade
(g/t Au)

LADD016

731.51

757.1

25.59

2.39

LADD016

Including 737.18

743.27

6.09

4.78

LADD016

Including 749.67

752.56

2.89

4.98

LADD016

672.85

680.94

8.09

1.9

LADD017

45.55

62.7

17.15

1.9

LADD017

92.68

118.45

25.77

6.24

LADD017

Including 100.76

110.05

9.29

9.68

LADD017

Including 112.95

118.45

5.5

9.75

LADD018

93.34

113.7

20.36

0.93

LADD018

152.48

178.2

25.72

2.26

LADD019

4.57

11.6

7.03

2.13

LADD021

75.21

88.17

12.96

2.09

LADD021

99.74

106

6.26

1.09

LADD021

144.78

160.51

15.73

5.28

LADD021

Including 144.78

149.78

5

13.7

LADD022

20.5

42

21.5

2.23

LADD022

Including 25.5

34

8.5

4.23

LADD023

227.1

261.73

34.63

3.12

LADD023

Including 231.65

237.4

5.75

7.23

LADD023

Including 248.1

255.25

7.15

5.55

LADD023

270.43

300.25

29.82

1.77

LADD024

216.15

227.65

11.5

3.47

LADD024

Including 224.1

227.65

3.55

7.79

LADD024

235.97

253.75

17.78

3.2

LADD025

258.38

266

7.62

1.16

LADD025

279.5

286.35

6.85

3.44

LADD025

301.1

311.57

10.47

1.74

LADD025

321.6

336.2

14.6

2.11

LADD025

342.65

361.75

19.1

4.11

LADD025

Including 349

357.75

8.75

5.4

NOTES:

1. It is estimated that the true widths of the mineralised sections for the drillholes are as follows:
LADD001 (82 %), LADD003 (80 %), LADD004 (81 %), LADD006 (95 %), LADD007 (89 %), LADD008 (62 %), LADD009 (82 %), LADD012 (86 %), LADD013 (85 %), LADD014 (78 %), LADD015 (65 %), LADD016 (69 %), LADD017 (71 %), LADD018 (75 %), LADD019 (65 %), LADD021 (73 %), LADD022 (58 %), LADD023 (76 %), LADD024 (77 %), and LADD025 (78 %) of the intercepted widths given in this table.

2. Drillholes LADD002, LADD005, LADD008, LADD010, and LADD011 were discontinued before intersecting the mineralised zone.



7.4.2 Relationship Between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold Grades

An exercise was undertaken to establish the relationship between gold values and sulphides (pyrite, pyrrhotite and arsenopyrite)/silicification. This was done for Drillholes LADD001 (from 130.80 m to 360.30 m), LADD003 (from 107.00 m to 309.20 m), LADD004 (from 418.50 m to 566.30 m), LADD006 (from 252.00 m to 395.35 m), LADD007 (from 490.20 m to 647.75 m), LDD008 (from 224.00 m to 365.35 m), LADD009 (from 552.76 m to 689.30 m), LADD012 (740.00 m to 948.30 m) and LADD013 (360.75 m to 485.80 m) as presented below.

Table 7.2 presents varying intensities of sulphide types in combinations with various degrees of silicification within the mineralised zones in LADD001, and the corresponding gold grades.

Table 7.2: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold Grades in LADD001

Composition

Observation

Typical Gold
Grades

Sample No.

Pyrite only:

 

 

 

High % of pyrite + moderate silicification

Weak gold values

0.63 g/t

62861

Pyrite + Pyrrhotite:

 

 

 

High % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + strong silicification

High gold values

10.40 g/t

62859

Low % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + strong silicification

Low gold values

0.19 g/t

62841

Pyrite + Arsenopyrite:

 

 

 

High % of pyrite + arsenopyrite + strong silicification

High gold values

10.50 g/t

62808

Low % of pyrite + arsenopyrite + strong silicification

Low gold values

0.10 g/t

62761

Pyrite + Pyrrhotite + Arsenopyrite:

 

 

 

High % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + arsenopyrite + strong silicification

High gold values

14.70 g/t

62919

Medium % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + arsenopyrite + strong silicification

Medium gold values

3.52 g/t

62931

Low % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + arsenopyrite + strong silicification

Low gold values

0.43 g/t

62946

Figure 7.10 displays the relationship between sulphides ± silicification and gold grades in Drillhole LADD001.


Figure 7.10: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold in Drillhole LADD001


Table 7.3 presents varying intensities of sulphide types in combinations with various degrees of silicification within the mineralised zones in LADD003, and the corresponding gold grades.

Table 7.3: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold Grades in LADD003

Composition

Observation

Typical Gold Grades

Sample No.

Silicification only

 

 

 

Moderate silicification

Low gold values

0.04 g/t

63112

Pyrite only:

 

 

 

Low % of pyrite + moderate silicification

Low gold values

0.09 g/t

63084

Medium % of pyrite + weak silicification

Low gold values

0.98 g/t

63096

Medium % of pyrite + moderate silicification

Medium gold values

1.27 g/t

63010

Pyrite + Pyrrhotite:

 

 

 

Low % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + weak silicification

Low gold values

0.02 g/t

63136

Medium % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + weak silicification

High gold values

4.71 g/t

63194

Pyrite + Arsenopyrite:

 

8.07 g/t

63119

High % of pyrite + arsenopyrite + strong silicification

High gold values

8.07 g/t

63119

Pyrite + Pyrrhotite + Arsenopyrite

 

 

 

Moderate % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + arsenopyrite + moderate silicification

Medium gold values

2.72 g/t

63127

High % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + arsenopyrite + strong silicification

High gold values

5.78 g/t

63121

Figure 7.11 displays the relationship between sulphides ± silicification and gold grades in Drillhole LADD003.


Figure 7.11: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold in Drillhole LADD003


Table 7.4 presents varying intensities of sulphide types in combinations with various degrees of silicification within the mineralised zones in LADD004, and the corresponding gold grades.

Table 7.4: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold Grades in LADD004

Composition Observation Typical Gold
Grades
Sample No.
Silicification only      
Weak silicification Low gold values 0.24 g/t 63315
Pyrite only:      
Low % of pyrite + weak silicification Low gold values 0.03 g/t 63322
Low % of pyrite + moderate silicification Low gold values 0.15 g/t 63303
Pyrite + Pyrrhotite:      
Low % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + moderate silicification Low gold values 0.34 g/t 63271
Medium % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + weak silicification Medium gold values 1.41 g/t 63247
Medium % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + moderate silicification Medium gold values 1.37 g/t 63326
Medium % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + strong silicification Medium gold values 2.14 g/t 63286
High % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + weak silicification High gold values 6.79 g/t 63301
Pyrite + Pyrrhotite + Arsenopyrite      
Medium % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + arsenopyrite + moderate silicification High gold values 3.36 g/t 63335
High % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + arsenopyrite + weak silicification High gold values 4.73 g/t 63332
High % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + arsenopyrite + moderate silicification High gold values 5.86 g/t 63354
High % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + arsenopyrite + strong silicification High gold values 8.52 g/t 63334

Figure 7.12 displays the relationship between sulphides ± silicification and gold grades in Drillhole LADD004.


Figure 7.12: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold in Drillhole LADD004

Table 7.5 presents varying intensities of sulphide types in combinations with various degrees of silicification within the mineralised zones in LADD006, and the corresponding gold grades.

Table 7.5: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold Grades in LADD006

Composition Observation Typical Gold
Grades
Sample No.
Silicification only:      
Weak silicification Low gold values 0.07 g/t 63437
Moderate silicification Low gold values 0.11 g/t 63431
Pyrite only:      
Low % of pyrite + weak silicification Low gold values 0.18 g/t 63490
Low % of pyrite + moderate silicification Low gold values 0.32 g/t 63485
Medium % of pyrite + moderate silicification Low gold values 0.69 g/t 63420
Pyrrhotite only:      
Low % of pyrrhotite + weak silicification Low gold values 0.27 g/t 63495



Composition Observation Typical Gold
Grades
Sample No.

Pyrite + Pyrrhotite:

 

 

 

Low % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + weak silicification

Low gold values

0.45 g/t

63422

Low % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + strong silicification

Low gold values

0.12 g/t

63498

Medium % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + moderate silicification

Medium gold values

1.34 g/t

63492

Medium % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + moderate silicification

High gold values

6.57 g/t

63489

Medium % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + strong silicification

Low gold values

0.79 g/t

63415

Pyrite + Arsenopyrite:

 

 

 

Medium % of pyrite + arsenopyrite + strong silicification

Medium gold values

2.45 g/t

63556

High % of pyrite+ arsenopyrite + strong silicification

High gold values

4.73 g/t

63354

Pyrite + Pyrrhotite + Arsenopyrite:

 

 

 

High % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + arsenopyrite + strong silicification

Medium gold values

2.12 g/t

63418

High % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + arsenopyrite + strong silicification

High gold values

4.92 g/t

63519

Figure 7.13 displays the relationship between sulphides ± silicification and gold grades in Drillhole LADD006.


Figure 7.13: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold in Drillhole LADD006

Table 7.6 presents varying intensities of sulphide types in combinations with various degrees of silicification within the mineralised zones in LADD007, and the corresponding gold grades.


Table 7.6: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold Grades in LADD007

Composition Observation Typical Gold
Grades
Sample No.
Silicification only:      
Weak silicification Low gold values 0.02 g/t 63661
Moderate silicification Low gold values 0.98 g/t 63704
Strong silicification Low gold values 0.08 g/t 63709
Pyrite only:      
Low % of pyrite + weak silicification Low gold values 0.01 g/t 63648
Low % of pyrite + moderate silicification Low gold values 0.22 g/t 63703
Medium % of pyrite + moderate silicification Medium gold values 2.80 g/t 63705
High % of pyrite + moderate silicification Medium gold values 1.56 g/t 63726
Pyrrhotite only:      
Low % of pyrrhotite + weak silicification Low gold values 0.14 g/t 63682
Pyrite + Pyrrhotite:      
Low % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + weak silicification Low gold values 0.01 g/t 63648
Medium % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + moderate silicification Medium gold values 2.20 g/t 63659
High % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + moderate silicification Medium gold values 1.56 g/t 63726
Pyrite + Arsenopyrite:      
Low % of pyrite + arsenopyrite + weak silicification Low gold values 0.54 g/t 63758
High % of pyrite + arsenopyrite + strong silicification High gold values 6.17 g/t 63710
Pyrite + Pyrrhotite + Arsenopyrite:      
Medium % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + arsenopyrite + weak silicification High gold values 3.96 g/t 63759
Medium % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + arsenopyrite + moderate silicification Medium gold values 2.04 g/t 63660
High % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + arsenopyrite + strong silicification High gold values 8.63 g/t 63767

Figure 7.14 displays the relationship between sulphides ± silicification and gold grades in Drillhole LADD007.


Figure 7.14: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold in Drillhole LADD007

Table 7.7 presents varying intensities of sulphide types in combinations with various degrees of silicification within the mineralised zones in LADD008, and the corresponding gold grades.


Table 7.7: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold Grades in LADD008

Composition Observation Typical Gold
Grades
Sample No.
Silicification only:      
Weak silicification Low gold values < 0.01 g/t 63884
Pyrite only:      
Low % of pyrite + weak silicification Low gold values 0.02 g/t 63953
Low % of pyrite + moderate silicification Low gold values 0.02 g/t 63918
Medium % of pyrite + weak silicification Low gold values 0.41 g/t 63894
Medium % of pyrite + moderate silicification Low gold values 0.36 g/t 63898
Medium % of pyrite + strong silicification Low gold values 0.96 g/t 63897
Pyrite + Pyrrhotite:      
Low % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + strong silicification Medium gold values 1.19 g/t 63908
Medium % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + weak silicification Low gold values 0.02 g/t 63893
Medium % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + moderate silicification Medium gold values 1.06 g/t 63921
High % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + strong silicification High gold values 3.33 g/t 63899
Pyrite + Arsenopyrite:      
Medium % of pyrite + arsenopyrite + moderate silicification Medium gold values 1.04 g/t 63886
Pyrrhotite + Arsenopyrite:      
Low % of pyrite + arsenopyrite + strong silicification Medium gold values 1.30 g/t 64012
Pyrite + Pyrrhotite + Arsenopyrite:      
Low % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + arsenopyrite + weak silicification Low gold values 0.16 g/t 63906
Low % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + arsenopyrite + moderate silicification Low gold values 0.78 g/t 63997
Low % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + arsenopyrite + strong silicification Low gold values 0.38 g/t 64024
Medium % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + arsenopyrite + weak silicification Medium gold values 1.76 g/t 63944
High % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + arsenopyrite + moderate silicification Medium gold values 1.52 g/t 63925
Medium % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + arsenopyrite + strong silicification Medium gold values 2.56 g/t 63976
High % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + arsenopyrite + strong silicification High gold values 6.28 g/t 63914

Figure 7.15 displays the relationship between sulphides ± silicification and gold grades in Drillhole LADD008.


Figure 7.15: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold in Drillhole LADD008

Table 7.8 presents varying intensities of sulphide types in combinations with various degrees of silicification within the mineralised zones in LADD009, and the corresponding gold grades.

Table 7.8: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold Grades in LADD009

Composition Observation Typical Gold
Grades
Sample No.
Silicification only:      
Weak silicification Low gold values 0.04 g/t 64174
Moderate silicification Low gold values ˂ 0.01 g/t 64048
Pyrite only:      
Low % of pyrite + weak silicification Low gold values 0.08 g/t 64064
Medium % of pyrite + weak silicification Medium gold values 1.50 g/t 64077
Medium % of pyrite + moderate silicification Medium gold values 2.62 g/t 64113
Pyrrhotite only:      
Low % of pyrrhotite + weak silicification Low gold values 0.06 g/t 64080



Composition Observation Typical Gold
Grades
Sample No.

Pyrite + Pyrrhotite:

 

 

 

Low % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + weak silicification

Low gold values

0.03 g/t

64051

Medium % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + weak silicification

Low gold values

0.48 g/t

64059

Medium % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + strong silicification

High gold values

5.06 g/t

64116

Pyrite + Pyrrhotite + Arsenopyrite:

 

 

 

Medium % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + arsenopyrite + weak silicification

High gold values

3.12 g/t

64084

Medium % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + arsenopyrite + moderate silicification

High gold values

9.13 g/t

64170

High % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + arsenopyrite + moderate silicification

High gold values

4.18 g/t

64055

High % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + arsenopyrite + strong silicification

High gold values

17.5 g/t

64153

Figure 7.16 displays the relationship between sulphides ± silicification and gold grades in Drillhole LADD009.

Figure 7.16: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold in Drillhole LADD009


Table 7.9 presents varying intensities of sulphide types in combinations with various degrees of silicification within the mineralised zones in LADD012, and the corresponding gold grades.

Table 7.9: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold Grades in LADD012

Composition

Observation

Typical Gold
Grades

Sample No.

Silicification only:

 

 

 

Weak silicification

Low gold values

0.07 g/t

64386

Moderate silicification

Low gold values

0.02 g/t

64603

Strong silicification

Low gold values

0.02 g/t

64576

Pyrite only:

 

 

 

Low % of pyrite + weak silicification

Low gold values

˂ 0.01 g/t

64357

Low % of pyrite + moderate silicification

Low gold values

˂ 0.01 g/t

64352

Low % of pyrite + strong silicification

Low gold values

0.19 g/t

64594

Pyrrhotite only:

 

 

 

Low % of pyrrhotite + moderate silicification

Low gold values

0.22 g/t

64672

Pyrite + Pyrrhotite:

 

 

 

Low % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + weak silicification

Low gold values

0.04 g/t

64332

Low % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + moderate silicification

Low gold values

0.14 g/t

64573

Medium % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + weak silicification

Low gold values

0.04 g/t

64116

Medium % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + strong silicification

Low gold values

0.02 g/t

64350

High % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + moderate silicification

Low gold values

0.04 g/t

64617

Pyrite + Arsenopyrite:

 

 

 

Low % of pyrite + arsenopyrite + weak silicification

Low gold values

0.05 g/t

64381

Medium % of pyrite + arsenopyrite + moderate silicification

Low gold values

0.69 g/t

64390

Pyrrhotite + Arsenopyrite:

 

 

 

Low % of pyrrhotite + arsenopyrite + moderate silicification

Low gold values

0.28 g/t

64674

Pyrite + Pyrrhotite + Arsenopyrite:

 

 

 

Medium % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + arsenopyrite + weak silicification

Low gold values

0.84 g/t

64355

Medium % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + arsenopyrite + moderate silicification

Low gold values

0.03 g/t

64346

High % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + arsenopyrite + moderate silicification

High gold values

16 g/t

64370

High % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + arsenopyrite + strong silicification

High gold values

10 g/t

64397

Figure 7.17 displays the relationship between sulphides ± silicification and gold grades in Drillhole LADD012.


Figure 7.17: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold in Drillhole LADD012

Table 7.10 presents varying intensities of sulphide types in combinations with various degrees of silicification within the mineralised zones in LADD013, and the corresponding gold grades.

Table 7.10: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold Grades in LADD013

Composition

Observation

Typical Gold
Grades

Sample No.

Silicification only:

 

 

 

Weak silicification

Low gold values

0.33 g/t

64508

Strong silicification

Low gold values

0.06 g/t

64472

Pyrite only:

 

 

 

Low % of pyrite + weak silicification

Low gold values

< 0.01 g/t

64415

Low % of pyrite + moderate silicification

Low gold values

0.04 g/t

64417

Low % of pyrite + strong silicification

Low gold values

0.09 g/t

64466

Medium % of pyrite + moderate silicification

Low gold values

0.40 g/t

64533

Pyrite + Pyrrhotite:

 

 

 

Low % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + weak silicification

Low gold values

0.03 g/t

64469




Composition

Observation

Typical Gold
Grades

Sample No.

Low % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + moderate silicification

Low gold values

0.03 g/t

64427

Medium % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + moderate silicification

Medium gold values

1.22 g/t

64506

Medium % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + weak silicification

Low gold values

0.67 g/t

64522

High % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + strong silicification

Low gold values

0.8 g/t

64471

Pyrite + Arsenopyrite

 

 

 

Low % of pyrite + arsenopyrite + weak silicification

Low gold values

0.12 g/t

64447

Medium % of pyrite + arsenopyrite + moderate silicification

Medium gold values

2.13 g/t

64487

Pyrite + Pyrrhotite + Arsenopyrite:

 

 

 

Medium % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + arsenopyrite + moderate silicification

Medium gold values

1.33 g/t

64457

High % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + arsenopyrite + moderate silicification

High gold values

4.46 g/t

64509

High % of pyrite + pyrrhotite + arsenopyrite + strong silicification

High gold values

6.09 g/t

64461

Figure 7.18 displays the relationship between sulphides ± silicification and gold grades in Drillhole LADD013.

Figure 7.18: Relationship between Sulphides ± Silicification and Gold in Drillhole LADD013


7.4.3 Range of Classifications

The range of classifications used are shown in Table 7.11.

Table 7.11: Range of Classification of Sulphides, Silicification and Gold Grades

Sulphides

Silicification

Gold Values

≤ 1 %: low percentage

Weak

Au ≤ 1.0 g/t: low gold value

> 1 % to ≤ 5 %: medium percentage

Moderate

1.0 g/t < Au ≤ 3 g/t: medium gold value

> 5 %: high percentage

Strong

Au > 3.0 g/t: high gold value

As evidenced from the above, a direct relationship exists between gold values and the percentage of sulphide mineralisation and the intensity of silicification. Some of the composition assemblages are absent within the sampled zones, for instance a high percentage of pyrite only + strong silicification etc. Pyrite is associated with all the assemblages; hence, it is difficult to have only a pyrrhotite + arsenopyrite + silicification composition.

In general, pyrite is the dominant sulphide followed by pyrrhotite, then arsenopyrite. When pyrite and pyrrhotite are associated with arsenopyrite, the gold values are very significant, compared to when pyrite is associated with pyrrhotite only. Silica is associated with the highest degree of hydrothermal alteration within the zones and serves as a marker of mineralisation; however, without sulphides, the gold values are insignificant.

Specks of visible gold, generally within fractures, are present in white to grey, glassy, weak to moderately brecciated quartz veins (with variable widths from a few centimetres up to 1 m), with low percentages of sulphide, mainly localised within the RP zone in some drillholes. Thus, a low percentage of py + ap + str qv = high gold values (21.20 g/t gold in sample No. 63500 in LADD006).

7.4.4 Visible Gold (VG)

Visible gold was logged in Drillhole LADD001 in a 5.6 m RP zone (highly silicified with 1.5 % pyrite, 1 % arsenopyrite, and 0.5 % pyrrhotite) logged from 251.30 m. In the unsplit core, four spots of visible gold were identified at 255.60 m, and between 256.2 m and 256.3 m (see Figure 7.19 a and b). Upon splitting the core, three specks of visible gold were identified from 256.10 m to 256.13 m and at 256.54 m (see Figure 7.19 c and d).



 a) VG at 255.60 m in unsplit core

 b) VG between 256.2 m and 256.3 m in unsplit core

 c) VG between 256.10 m and 256.13 m in split core

 d) VG at 256.54 m in split core

Figure 7.19: Visible Gold in Unsplit Core and Split Core

Four specks of visible gold were also logged in Drillhole LADD026 within the interval 593.26 m to 594.84 m (see Figure 7.20 a and b).

a) VG in quartz vein within RP zone at 593.26 m

b) VG in quartz vein within RP zone at 594.71 m

Figure 7.20: Visible Gold in Drillhole LADD026


7.5 STRUCTURES

Gold mineralisation within the Adumbi deposit is related to the northwest trending shear zones, which dip steeply towards the northeast and which, in some parts of the area, seem to utilise the competency contrast between two lithologies, namely the BIF-chert and the tuffaceous-greywacke metasedimentary rocks.

This mineralisation occurs over a strike length of 2 km in a zone approximately 100 m wide to a depth of approximately 560 m. The continuity of the mineralisation appears to be oriented vertically close to the wall rocks of the BIF. The strike orientation of the BIF is northwest-southeast, which is parallel to the trend of the Upper Kibalian rocks. The BIF is interpreted to have a steep, near-vertical dip. A series of north-northwest striking faults appear to dislocate the BIF, and it is interpreted that these faults have a strike-slip component, resulting in an apparent thickening of the BIF in the central part of Adumbi.

Structural logging for the Kitenge holes is limited due to the lack of orientated core. However, some observed structural features include zones of strong shearing associated with extensive ankerite alteration, bleaching, quartz veining and isolated low-grade gold mineralisation in Drillhole SKDD0028. These zones are very important as gold mineralisation in Kitenge is mostly associated with these zones especially when there is a relative high content of sulphides and, in particular, the presence of arsenopyrite

Structural logging for the Manzako holes is limited due to the lack of orientated core. Quartz veining within the shear zones control the mineralisation.

7.5.1 Imbo Project Structural Data Analysis

Structural data compilation and interpretation for the Imbo Permit was undertaken to collate all the available data from recent and previous mapping programmes, domain the data sets, and plot and interpret the data using Dips software. The objectives were to

  • Interpret the structural framework of the Imbo Permit on a regional and prospect scale, and to determine the regional and local structural controls on the distribution of gold mineralisation.
  • Use this in conjunction with geophysical and geochemical data to
  • Prioritise new prospect areas for follow-up.
  • Investigate potential extensions in the vicinity of known mineralisation.

Data was collated from the following sources:

  • Structural readings taken since March 2014, which are recorded in database format and plotted in plan
  • Integration of the underground mapping data gathered by N. Hewson from Adumbi
  • Earlier structural data extracted from maps

Once all the future drill cores are oriented, it would be possible for structural measurements to be taken and integrated with the structural data from other sources.


A total of 1,046 measurements (bedding, foliations and quartz veins) covering the Adumbi West, Adumbi, Canal, Senegal, Kitenge and Manzako deposits were compiled from the above-mentioned sources. These measurements were taken using a strike (right)/dip convention. Plans showing foliation, bedding and quartz veins with inserts of respective stereonet plots are presented in Figure 7.21.

In general, the stereonet plots for the available data on the Imbo Project show that quartz veins are generally subparallel to the foliation and bedding with average orientations of 311°/78°, 315°/81° and 316°/80°, respectively. This conforms well to the regional trend that is well defined in the geophysical data of the Imbo Project. It can also be noted that stereonet plots for bedding show two major planes which define a fold oriented 317°/07°, a possible regional fold representing an early folding event of the Imbo Project.

NOTE: Geology, stereonet plot for bedding (A), foliation (B), quartz veins (C), drillhole traces and location of targets/prospects.

Figure 7.21: Imbo Project - Bedding, Foliation and Quartz Veins with Stereonet Plots

A further analysis of the structural data involved domaining the data on the basis of deposits/targets and its association with the known mineralisation within the deposit/ target. This was done with the aim of assisting in a detailed structural interpretation on a deposit/target scale. Details for Adumbi, Kitenge-Senegal and Manzako are provided below.


7.5.1.1 Adumbi Deposit

Most of the existing structural data for Adumbi is from underground mapping with some additional data from regional mapping that commenced in March 2014. Figure 7.22 to Figure 7.24 show bedding, foliations and quartz veins plotted on plans with the inserts of the respective stereonet plots.

Stereonet plots for bedding show two major planes oriented 315°/81° and 137°/84° defining a shallow northwesterly plunging fold (316°/07°), see Figure 7.22. The geometry of this fold does not conform to the architectural behaviour of the Adumbi mineralisation described in this section due to the fact that this fold possibly represents an earlier folding event that has been mostly over-printed by the later shear-related folding. This is further emphasised by the fact that most of the bedding measurements were taken in the areas that are not in the strongly folded and deformed zones.

It is observed that foliations are generally parallel to bedding (see Figure 7.23), with average orientations of 314°/79° and 315°/81°, respectively, while the quartz veins have a general relatively less northerly orientation of 309°/79°.

Figure 7.24 also shows the stereonet plot for the Adumbi quartz veins, which have two major planes oriented 309°/79° and 125°/83° defining a linear structure that is shallowly plunging to the southeast. It is not known if the intersection of these quartz vein major planes is associated with the mineralising event, but it is doubtful as it is known from previous interpretation that mineralisation at Adumbi is characterised by steep plunging shoots.


Figure 7.22: Adumbi Deposit - Geology from Underground Mapping Bedding Planes (Insert of Stereonet Plot for Bedding)


Figure 7.23: Adumbi Deposit - Geology from Underground Mapping Bedding Planes (Insert of Stereonet Plot for Foliation)


Figure 7.24: Adumbi Deposit - Geology from Underground Mapping, Quartz Veins (Insert of Stereonet Plot for Quartz Veins)


For a better understanding of the structural behaviour along strike and across the Adumbi mineralisation, the structural data was domained, and stereonet plots for bedding in selected domains (blocks labelled 1 to 4) were inserted as shown in Figure 7.25.

The stereonet plot for bedding in Domain 1 shows two major planes oriented 316°/82° and 137°/82° that define a northwesterly shallow plunging fold (316°/04°), possibly representing the earlier folding event of the Imbo Project.

Bedding in Domain 2 shows two major planes oriented 317°/79° and 351°/76°, defining a northeasterly, steeply plunging fold (087°/76°).

Bedding in Domain 3 shows three major planes oriented 318°/79°, 162°/81° and 013°/81°, defining folds that are trending 063°/78°, 330°/51° and 177°/58°.

Bedding in Domain 4, which covers the area of no shearing or deformation, shows a major plane oriented 319°/83°, representing a regional trend of the Imbo Project.

Folds defined in Domains 2 and 3 are possibly shear-related folds and are probably minor folds that represent a major fold which is partially exposed in Adumbi. Underground mapping suggests that the fold axes of these minor folds are parallel to the Adumbi shear zone and that the shear zone possibly represents the axial plane of a major fold.

Figure 7.25: Adumbi Deposit - Geology from Underground Mapping (Inserts of Stereonet Plots for Selected Domains (Blocks 1 to 4))

7.5.1.2 Kitenge and Senegal


The Kitenge and Senegal deposit is located southeast of the Canal area. Gold mineralisation is hosted in quartz veins within sheared and altered metasediments, mainly quartz carbonate schist, and the structure is interpreted as a faulted structure of Adumbi.

The stereonet plot for foliation attitudes indicates an average orientation of 318°/79° (see Figure 7.26, Insert 3), which is generally similar to the regional trend. Due to a lack of quartz and bedding measurements, no stereonet plots were produced.


Figure 7.26: Adumbi Deposit - Geology Foliations (Inserts of Stereonet Plots for Foliations at Senegal, Kitenge and Senegal-Kitenge Area)


7.5.1.3 Manzako

The current interpretation shows that the mineralised structure in Manzako is different from the Adumbi-Canal-Senegal-Kitenge structure.

Gold mineralisation in the Manzako deposit is hosted in quartz veins emplaced within sheared basalt.

It is observed that Manzako has two distinct foliation trends orienting at 316°/78° and 148°/76°, respectively. The intersection lineation plunges shallowly to the northwest (see Figure 7.27, Insert 1). There are few quartz measurements; the available data suggests quartz veins cross cuts foliations at 302°/81° (see Figure 7.27, Insert 2).


Figure 7.27: Manzako Deposit - Geology, Foliations, Quartz Veins (Inserts of Stereonet Plot for Foliations and Quartz Veins)


In summary, the following are observations derived from the structural analysis of the Imbo Project:

  • Presence of regional fold (Imbo fold), which plunges shallowly to the northwest (07°/316°).
  • Regionally, foliations are subparallel to beddings.
  • Possible presence of shear-related tight fold at Adumbi area, indicated by steeply plunging folds adjacent to mineralised structure.
  • Presence of two structures which intersect at Adumbi and split in the NW and SE of Adumbi in the Mabele Mokonzi-Mambo Bado and Canal areas, respectively.
  • Foliations and mineralised quartz vein trends at Vatican have generally fewer northerly orientations in comparison to those at Adumbi.

7.5.2 Structural Interpretation from 2020 to 2021 Drilling Programme at Adumbi

The structural interpretation to date from the drillholes completed during the 2020 to 2021 drilling programme at Adumbi is presented below.

7.5.2.1 Bedding

The stereonet plot for bedding for 2,820 poles from LADD001, LADD003, LADD004, LADD006, LADD007, LADD008, LADD009, LADD012, LADD013, LADD014, LADD015, LADD016, LADD017, LCDD001, LADD018, LADD019, LADD020, LADD021, LADD022, LADD023, LADD024, LADD025 and LADD026 shows a plane oriented at 314°/88° dipping NE (see Figure 7.28), which confirms the general trend of the Adumbi formation which is NW-SE and dips to the NE.

Other poles, however, plot 134°/89°, dipping to the SW, thus representing folding.

Figure 7.28: Stereonet Plot for Bedding Planes from Completed 2020 to 2021 Drillholes


7.5.2.2 Foliation

It is observed that foliations for 3,245 poles from LADD001, LADD003, LADD004, LADD006, LADD07, LADD008, LADD009, LADD012, LADD013, LADD014, LADD015, LADD016, LADD017, LCDD001, LADD018, LADD019, LADD020, LADD021, LADD022, LADD023, LADD024, LADD025 and LADD026 are generally parallel to bedding with an average orientation of 314°/87° (see Figure 7.29). Like bedding, other foliation poles plot 135°/89°, with a subvertical limb dipping to the SW, representing folding.

Figure 7.29: Stereonet Plot for Foliation Planes from Completed 2020 to 2021 Drillholes

7.5.2.3 Quartz Veins

The stereonet plot for 1,827 poles of quartz veins from LADD001, LADD003, LADD004, LADD006, LADD007, LADD008, LADD009, LADD012, LADD013, LADD014, LADD015, LADD016, LADD017, LCDD001, LADD018, LADD019, LADD020, LADD021, LADD022, LADD023, LADD024, LADD025 and LADD026 is generally oriented 313°/85°, which is almost parallel to the bedding/foliation (see Figure 7.30). However, the plot of quartz veins has a relatively less northerly orientation. A few post-mineralisation quartz veins are observed cutting across both bedding and foliation, and in some cases, they are suspected to have displaced the mineralisation.


Figure 7.30: Stereonet Plot for Quartz Veins from Completed 2020 to 2021 Drillholes

7.5.2.4 Bedding/Foliation Intersection Lineation

The bedding/foliation intersection lineation is 00° at 133° (see Figure 7.31). If the foliation is axial planar, then this intersection lineation approximates a fold axis.

Figure 7.31: Stereonet Plot for Intersection Lineation of Bedding and Foliation from Completed 2020 to 2021 Drillholes

7.5.2.5 Foliation/Quartz Vein Intersection Lineation

The foliation/quartz vein intersection lineation is 26° at 315° (see Figure 7.32).


Figure 7.32: Stereonet Plot for Intersection Lineation of Foliation and Quartz Veins from Completed 2020 to 2021 Drillholes

The structural interpretation from the recent drilling programme thus supports the general Adumbi formation.



8 DEPOSIT TYPES

Gold deposits within the Imbo Project are associated with the globally important Neo-Archean orogenic gold deposits, examples of which are found in most Neo-Archean cratons around the world. Gold mineralisation is associated with the epigenetic mesothermal style of mineralisation. This style of mineralisation is typical of gold deposits in Neo-Archean greenstone terranes and is generally associated with regionally metamorphosed rocks that have experienced a long history of thermal and deformational events. These deposits are invariably structurally controlled.

Mineralisation in this environment is commonly of the fracture and vein type in brittle fracture to ductile dislocation zones. At the Adumbi deposit, the gold mineralisation is generally associated with quartz and quartz-carbonate-pyrite ± pyrrhotite ± arsenopyrite veins in a BIF horizon.

Examples of similar type gold deposits to Adumbi include Geita in Tanzania, Kibali in northeastern DRC, Tasiast in Mauritania, Homestake (U.S.A.), Lupin (Canada) and Moro Velho in Brazil.


9 EXPLORATION

This section includes a summary of the exploration work completed within the Imbo licence area during the 2020/21 exploration phase. The past exploration activity on the Imbo Project was originally summarised in the RPA NI 43-101 technical report entitled "Technical Report on the Somituri Project, Imbo Licence, Democratic Republic of the Congo" and dated February 28, 2014 (available from SEDAR at www.sedar.com).

9.1 SUMMARY OF PRE-2014 EXPLORATION

Kilo's main objectives for conducting exploration on the Imbo Project were to

  • Enhance the understanding of the extent and style of the mineralisation in order to successfully conduct diamond drilling, leading to Mineral Resource estimates for Adumbi, Manzako, and Kitenge.
  • Optimise the deposit models and exploration strategies to be applied in delineating other potential deposits within the Imbo Project.

Initial exploration in the Imbo Project in 2010 concentrated on the Adumbi deposit. The exploration techniques employed included soil sampling, geological mapping, and sampling of existing adits, trenching, and diamond drilling. Localities of historical and active artisanal mining operations provided guidance for the initial exploration activities.

9.1.1 Soil Sampling

A total of 9,246 soil samples (including quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) samples) were collected over an area of 63 km², covering the Kitenge, Manzako, Canal, Vatican, Monde Arabe, and Adumbi deposits and prospects (see Table 9.1). Sample spacing over the Manzako deposit was 20 m × 80 m, and elsewhere it was 320 m × 20 m, with some infills at 160 m × 20 m. All soil samples were collected at a vertical depth of 1 m.

Table 9.1: Summary of Soil Sampling by Kilo on the Imbo Project

Year

No. of Soil Samples

2010

1,230

2011

3,282

2012

4,206

2013

528

Total

9,246

Analytical Solutions Ltd (ASL) compiled a report on the soil geochemistry of the Imbo Project in October 2013 and concluded as follows:

  • Multi-element data mirrors the lithological interpretation based on the airborne magnetic and radiometric survey.
  • There is limited mechanical or chemical dispersion of the medium sampled.
  • Six gold anomalous areas were delineated underlain by metavolcanic rocks and void of historical or artisanal exploitation.

  • Two gold anomalous areas were delineated underlain by metasedimentary rocks (and possibly some iron formation rocks) that warrant follow-up exploration.
  • Elements usually considered "immobile" are reasonably well digested by aqua regia in deeply weathered soils allowing reliable lithological interpretation.

9.1.2 Geological Mapping

Geological mapping in 2010 was focused on areas of historical gold exploitation and active artisanal mining activities. Approximately 8.4 km² covering the Adumbi, Kitenge, Manzako, Adumbi North and the Vatican Prospects was mapped.

Lithological contacts and shear zones within the metasediments at Adumbi, as well as exposure of weathered or oxidised BIF and chert units on the top of Adumbi Hill, were mapped.

There was limited outcrop at Kitenge; nonetheless, multiple quartz veins within the Kitenge shear zone were mapped.

Mapping at Manzako identified a northwest-southeast trending shear zone (over 2 km strike length) hosting a number of existing adits and narrow open pits trending parallel to the strike direction of the shear zone.

Mapping at Bagbaie, Vatican and Monde Arabe identified a northwest-southeast trending quartz vein hosted shear zone with artisanal workings.

9.1.3 Trenching

Trenching was undertaken in order to evaluate near-surface gold mineralisation and to provide lithological information to determine the strike extent of the mineralisation and gold-bearing host rocks.

In all, 44 trenches totalling 4,753 m were excavated over the Adumbi, Kitenge and Manzako deposits from 2010 through to 2012. This comprised 23 trenches for 2,745 m at Adumbi, 6 trenches for 878 m at Kitenge and 15 trenches for 1,130 m at Manzako. Table 9.2 summarises some significant trench intercepts at Adumbi, Kitenge and Manzako.

Table 9.2: Summary of Significant Trench Intercepts at Adumbi, Kitenge and Manzako

Trench ID

From
(m)

To
(m)

Intercept Width
(m)

Grade
(g/t Au)

SATR002

23.95

24.95

1

1.50

SATR004

0

13.5

13.5

1.18

 

15

20.3

5.3

1.64

SATR005

73.3

79.2

5.9

2.06

SATR006

0

3

3

1.18

4.9

15.8

10.9

0.96

29.1

43.5

14.4

2.17

SATR007

3.3

8.8

5.5

5.15

SATR008

0

7.5

7.5

1.87




Trench ID

From
(m)

To
(m)

Intercept Width
(m)

Grade
(g/t Au)

 

59.5

63.5

4

1.38

SATR009

25.6

29

3.4

0.91

SATR010

7.7

12.7

5

1.03

21.4

30.2

8.8

1.86

SATR013

26.1

38

11.9

1.64

SATR014

64.3

66.9

2.6

1.59

SATR015

21.8

25.8

4

1.48

SATR017

40.6

45

4.4

1.65

SATR018

10.4

13.1

2.7

4.02

63.3

68.7

5.4

0.98

9.1.4 Underground Exploration

Accessible adits and underground workings were geologically mapped and sampled at Adumbi; however, those at Kitenge and Manzako were not readily accessible.

In 2010, Kilo geologists sampled four historical adits at Adumbi totalling 609 m and generated 549 horizontal channel samples (including QA/QC samples).

In 2012, a Kilo contract geologist mapped and sampled three additional adits and two crosscuts at Adumbi. He also mapped the four adits sampled in 2010 and other mine workings where accessible.

In all, a total of 907 m was sampled to generate 843 channel samples. Significant underground sample results at Adumbi are presented in Table 9.3. None of the other historical underground mine workings on the Imbo Project were geologically mapped or sampled by Kilo.

Table 9.3: Significant Underground Sample Results at Adumbi

Adit ID

From
(m)

To
(m)

Intercept Width
(m)

Grade
(g/t Au)

SAAD001

101

109

8

2.63

113

154

41

1.31

SAAD002

97.5

107.5

10

2.06

SAAD003

155.5

159.5

4

1.66

SAAD006

29

31

2

2.12

111

114

3

2.37

119

123

4

2.47



9.1.5 Airborne Geophysical Survey

Kilo contracted New Resolution Geophysics (NRG) from South Africa to complete a high-resolution, helicopter-mounted, XPlorer magnetic and radiometric survey for the Imbo Project. The survey was conducted from April 12 to 15, 2012, over 1,416 km at a line spacing of 100 m by 1,000 m orientated at 040° to 220°. NRG produced plots of the following:

  • Total field gradient enhanced magnetics
  • First vertical derivative magnetics
  • Reduced to pole magnetics
  • Analytic signal
  • Four-channel normalised singular value deviation (NASVD) processed radiometric data (total count, potassium, uranium and thorium)
  • Calculated digital terrain

The magnetic survey delineated a number of linear anomalies characterised by demagnetisation. In addition, a BIF was delineated over a strike length of 2 km from the demarcated northwestern limit of the Adumbi-Canal gold deposit. The total field and radiometric data was utilised by Kilo in the compilation of the structural and lithological interpretation for the Imbo Project.

9.2 POST-2014 TO 2020 EXPLORATION

Following the Inferred Mineral Resource of 1.675 Moz of gold outlined in February 2014 by RPA on three separate deposits, Adumbi, Kitenge and Manzako (see Figure 7.2), RPA made a number of recommendations on Adumbi, which were subsequently undertaken during the period 2014 to 2018. The following subsections outline the work carried out during the period.

9.2.1 Soil Sampling

In 2017, a soil sampling programme (area of 1.5 km × 5 km, on a 40 m × 160 m grid) was planned east of the Imbo River with the objective of further investigating the bulk leach extractable gold (BLEG) and rock chip anomalies identified in 2015. This however was not carried out as planned due to security concerns in the area.

In April 2020, soil sampling commenced in the Imbo East Prospect.

9.2.2 Regional BLEG Survey

A BLEG survey was carried out over the Imbo Project between March and June 2015. BLEG sampling is a regional geochemical technique involving the analysis of stream sediments with the objective of defining areas of gold anomalism for more detailed follow-up. It has the advantage of reliably assessing large tracts of ground relatively quickly and cost effectively.

The main objective of the programme by Kilo was to assess the parts of the Imbo Project not covered by grid mapping and soil geochemistry, in particular the area to the east of the Imbo River where no groundwork has been carried out. However, in order to compare results in these areas with zones of known mineralisation, the whole of the licence area was covered (see Figure 9.1).


The survey was conducted in two stages, Phases 1 and 2, covering the areas to the west and east of the Imbo River, respectively.

Figure 9.1: Location of BLEG Catchment Areas and Sampling Sites on the Imbo Project

9.2.2.1 Sample Selection

The drainages, catchment boundaries and sampling sites were delineated in Target® using a 5 m colour elevation image and hydrography vector map produced from Landsat data by Photosat in Toronto (see Figure 9.2). A 2 m topographic contour map, also generated by Photosat, was used where necessary (see Figure 9.2, insert).

A total of 166 drainage catchments were defined with a total area of 113 km², resulting in an average catchment size of 0.68 km². Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates for the selected sample sites were derived from Target® and transferred to the hand-held GPS instruments used by the sampling teams.


NOTE: Insert shows detail and 2 m contours.

Figure 9.2: Imbo Project - Location of BLEG Catchment Areas, Sampling Points and Drainage Channels on the 5 m Image

9.2.2.2 Sampling Procedure and Sample Preparation

Phases 1 and 2 were carried out by two sampling teams, each consisting of a geologist accompanied by a field assistant and four labourers. The Phase 1 sampling sites were all accessed from the Adumbi base camp while four fly camps were established east of the Imbo River to facilitate Phase 2.

BLEG samples were collected according to the protocol detailed below:

  • The sampling teams navigated to each site by handheld GPS.
  • At the sampling site, the geologist recorded the characteristics of the stream and alluvial material, any sources of contamination such as artisanal workings and settlements, and mapped/sampled any outcrop in the vicinity. All the data was transferred to an electronic database in the base camp.
  • Using plastic scoops, approximately 200 g of the finest sediment fraction (mud) was collected from the top of the stream bed, at about 15 places along the stream, within 20 m of the planned site.

  • The material collected was transferred into a single plastic bucket, the bucket was filled with water, and the contents were swirled and allowed to stand for 15 s.
  • The mud suspension was then passed through a 1 mm nylon mesh into a second plastic bucket to remove organic debris, leaving any sand and silt as a residue in the bottom of the first bucket.
  • Pre-prepared Magnafloc® solution was then gradually added to the mud suspension until flocculation of the mud could be seen.
  • After allowing the flocculated mud to stand for several minutes, excess water was decanted from it.
  • The flocculated mud slurry was then poured into a pre-marked calico bag, allowing most of the remaining water to drain through the bag.
  • As and when necessary, the calico bag was gently squeezed to further reduce the water content.
  • The weight of the wet sample was recorded; a minimum of 3 kg is required to provide 1 kg of dry sample.
  • Field duplicates were collected at every fifth sampling site. The 33 field duplicate samples were collected in exactly the same way as the original samples, from the same stretch of stream, and given independent sample numbers.
  • Back at the camp, the samples were air dried for several days, with frequent agitation by hand to prevent caking.
  • Final drying to remove any remaining moisture was done by placing samples in the laboratory oven for 12 h at 80 °C.
  • Final disaggregation of the clay particles was carried out by gently rolling with a bottle.
  • 1 kg of each sample was weighed and transferred into marked geochemical sample packets and sealed in plastic bags for despatch. Standards (1 per 50 samples) and blanks (2 per 50 samples), gaps for which had been left in the sampling sequence, were inserted at this stage.

At these localities, standard stream sediment samples were also taken, for comparison with the BLEG data. A total of 166 BLEG samples were collected for both Phases 1 and 2, in addition to 33 field duplicate samples. In addition, 33 stream sediments plus 33 field duplicates were collected during the exercise.

The original and duplicate BLEG samples were assayed as follows:

  • No additional sample preparation was required.
  • Au, Ag, Cu and Pd by cyanide leach bottle roll on 1 kg, with reporting limits for Au of 1 ppb to 10,000 ppb (Method Au-CN12).
  • A suite of 53 elements by aqua regia digestion of the 0.5 g of sample, and analysis by ICP-MS and ICP-AES (Method ME-MS41L).

The original and duplicate stream sediment samples were dried and disaggregated at the camp, and were submitted to the laboratory for analysis as follows:

  • Sieve to −180 micron (80 mesh).
  • Conduct a fire assay of the − 180 micron (80 mesh) fraction for Au, using a 50 g charge (Method Au-AA24).

  • Conduct a test for a suite of 53 elements by aqua regia digestion of the 0.5 g of sample, and analysis by ICP-MS and ICP-AES (Method ME-MS41L).

A summary of the sample types, number of samples, and analytical methods is given in Table 9.4.

Table 9.4: Summary of Sample Types and Analytical Methods, Phases 1 and 2

Sample Type No. of Samples Analytical Methods
Phase 1 Phase 2 Total
BLEG 76 90 166 Bottle Roll (Au)
Multi-Element ICP
BLEG - Field Duplicate 15 18 33 Bottle Roll (Au)
Multi-Element ICP
Stream Sediment 15 18 33 Sieve to −80 mm mesh
Fire Assay (Au)
Multi-Element ICP
Stream Sediment - Field Duplicate 15 18 33 Sieve to −80 mesh
Fire Assay (Au)
Multi-Element ICP

9.2.2.3 BLEG Sampling Results

All the BLEG sample results (Au bottle roll) are as plotted in Figure 9.3. The map illustrates the spatial distribution of the individual gold values.


Figure 9.3: Phase 1 and 2 BLEG Results for Au showing Catchments Recommended for Follow-Up

9.2.2.3.1 Gold

The gold values for all the catchment areas are shown in Figure 9.3, which highlights the annotation of the anomalies. The following observations could be made:

  • A close spatial relationship exists between the catchments with higher gold values and the known mineralisation at the Adumbi, Kitenge, Manzako and Monde Arabe prospects. It should be noted, however, that mining during colonial times, followed by intense artisanal activity over several decades, has probably increased the amount of gold released into the associated drainages. It should not be assumed, therefore, that lower-order anomalies elsewhere are not significant in terms of mineralisation potential.
  • In the Phase 1 area, anomalous values of 62 ppb Au and 108 ppb Au were returned for Catchments 21 and 13, respectively. These catchments are not completely covered by the current soil sampling grid and are recommended for follow-up work.
  • Catchment 48 returned a value of 324 ppb Au, significantly higher than the sample from the catchment upstream (185 ppb Au), which probably represents downstream distribution of gold from the Canal and Vatican prospects. Additional work in Catchment 48 is recommended.

  • Other catchments in the Phase 1 area, to the north and south of the current soil sampling grid, have a low gold mineralisation potential, and no further work is recommended in these areas.
  • In the Phase 2 area, the gold data clearly indicates a southeastern extension of the Adumbi/Kitenge/Manzako mineralised zone, over a strike of at least 7 km. Anomalous values in this area range from 51 ppb Au to 719 ppb Au, the highest value occurring in a catchment in the Esio area immediately northwest of several colonial adits.
  • Catchments in the northern part of the Phase 2 area generally returned background gold values, although weakly anomalous values of 12 ppb Au to 18 ppb Au occurred in some areas associated with alluvial diggings and a rock chip sample of BIF grading 1.69 g/t Au. Mineralisation in this area seems to be less well developed and more sporadic than in the zone to the south, and it is recommended that follow-up work should be concentrated in the southern zone at this stage.

A comparison of the BLEG and stream sediment samples indicates that, for samples with > 50 ppb Au, both methods provide similar results. However, for samples with < 50 ppb Au, the BLEG samples provide more consistent data, with less analytical scatter. The multi-element ICP data for original and field duplicates shows good correlations for both methods. However, correlation coefficients are slightly higher for the BLEG samples, indicating a lower nugget effect. It is therefore recommended that, for future regional surveys, BLEG sampling should be employed with gold analysis by bottle roll, rather than stream sediment sampling with gold analysis by fire assay.

The analytical results of the standards, blanks and field duplicates conclude that (a) the sampling method successfully produced representative samples with a low nugget effect and very good repeatability, and (b) the laboratory produced accurate and precise results, with no significant analytical error or bias.

9.2.2.3.2 Multi-Elements

In all, 52 elements were analysed in addition to gold and can be classified into the following groups: (a) elements associated with gold mineralisation, (b) elements preferentially associated with the metasedimentary terrain, (c) elements preferentially associated with the metavolcanic terrain, and (d) elements with no apparent association. This grouping is summarised in Table 9.5.

Table 9.5: Association of Elements in the Phase 1 and 2 BLEG Survey Areas

Association

Elements

Gold Mineralisation

Ag, As, Bi (weak), Hf (weak), Hg, Pb (weak), Th (weak), W (weak), Zr (weak)

Metasedimentary Terrain

Ce, Cs, K, La, Mo, Rb, Se, Sr, Ti, U

Metavolcanic Terrain

Al, Ca, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Ga, In, Li, Mg, Mn, Ni, P, Sb, Sc, Ti, V, Y, Zn

No Apparent Association

Ba, Be, Cd, Ge, Na, Nb, Pd, S, Sn, Te

9.2.2.4 Conclusion


To the west of the Imbo River, outside the known mineralisation in the Adumbi, Kitenge and Manzako areas, the most significant Au anomalies are as follows:

  • Catchment 13 (108 ppb Au, 346 ppm As) located 3 km NW of Adumbi
  • Catchment 21 (62 ppb Au, 790 ppm As) located 2 km NE of Adumbi
  • Catchment 48 (324 ppb Au, 234 ppm As) located 3.5 km S of Adumbi

To the east of the Imbo River, anomalous Au values occur in a zone trending NW-SE over a strike of 7 km, which appears to be the strike extension of the Adumbi/Kitenge/Manzako mineralised trend. Maximum Au and As values for the BLEG samples are 719 ppb and 140 ppm, respectively. The anomalous zone covers an area of colonial and artisanal mining activity, with rock chip samples taken during the BLEG survey grading up to 15.1 g/t.

The current survey has enabled the Imbo Project to be geochemically sampled reliably, quickly, and cost effectively. It has been of particular importance in assessing the mineralisation potential of areas not previously explored on the ground, i.e. outside the soil grid to the west of the Imbo River, and the whole area east of the Imbo River.

The data quality and effectiveness of the BLEG technique are supported by the multi-element results, which correlate well with the distribution of metavolcanic and metasedimentary rocks, interpreted from the geophysical data.

9.2.2.5 Recommendation

It is recommended that

  • Follow-up exploration should be prioritised in the zone of anomalous BLEG samples in the southern part of the Phase 2 block, commencing in the central part near the Esio workings, and extending along strike to the NW and SE.
  • Second priority follow-up work should incorporate the three anomalous catchments to the west of the Imbo River, which lie outside the current soil grid. The As value for Catchment 21 is very high at 790 ppm and should be the initial focus.
  • Work on the above anomalies should initially comprise soil sampling in areas of residual overburden (or auger drilling where the overburden is suspected to be transported) initially on 160 m spaced lines.
  • Similar drainage sampling surveys should be carried out on Adumbi Holdco's other licences in the Ngayu belt. Sampling should be done by the BLEG method with Au analysis by bottle roll, rather than on non-flocculated samples by fire assay.

9.2.3 Geological Mapping

Mapping and channel sampling of workings in the Adumbi, Adumbi West and Adumbi Hill areas were undertaken, and a summary of the work completed is shown in Table 9.6 and Figure 9.4. Mapping was carried out on 50 m spaced lines, and in addition to lithological and structural data, various physical features such as old and active workings, tracks, streams and settlements were captured.


Part of the objective of mapping Adumbi Hill was to be able to correlate the surface geology, workings, adits and other surface information with that known from the drilling and other existing data including recently surveyed adits and workings.

Mapping in the area to the west of Adumbi Hill exposed several abandoned and active workings including trenches, artisanal pits, adits and some outcrops found along cross lines. These features are concentrated around the Mabele Mokonzi area located in the eastern part of the Mambo Bado artisanal camps, the western part of Adumbi Hill, Kananga located to the northeast of the grid, and a small part of Adumbi East Hill. A large riverine swamp being drained by the Adumbi River is the locus of moderate alluvial activity by artisanal miners.

Three zones of BIF were inferred based on a rare outcrop and float, and occur within a sequence of quartz carbonate, carbonaceous and chlorite schists. Quartz veins up to 45 cm wide occur within the schist and are being exploited by artisanal miners. In the vicinity of these veins, the host rocks contain weak to moderate foliation parallel quartz veinlets, patches of limonite, and may also display disseminated crystals of pyrite and boxworks.

Rock chip sampling was also carried out in tandem with the geological mapping exercise. A total of 267 samples were collected for assay.

Table 9.6: Summary of Mapping and Pitting Programmes in the Adumbi and Adumbi West Areas

Month

Activity

Number of Samples

Gridding

Trench

Pit

Other Channels

Number

Metres

Number

Metres

Number

Metres

Rocks

Trench

Regolith
Pit

Other
Channels

Mar 2014

0.00

0

0.00

0

0.00

0

0.00

0

0

0

0

Apr 2014

0.00

0

0.00

0

0.00

0

0.00

0

0

0

0

May 2014

0.00

0

0.00

0

0.00

0

0.00

0

0

0

0

Jun 2014

16.00

0

0.00

4

10.10

0

0.00

56

0

14

0

Jul 2014

39.64

0

0.00

0

0.00

0

0.00

55

0

0

0

Aug 2014

6.64

1

206.00

0

0.00

0

0.00

8

32

0

0

Sep 2014

21.20

0

70.60

0

0.00

0

0.00

44

34

0

0

Oct 2014

24.00

0

103.40

0

0.00

0

0.00

56

8

0

0

Nov 2014

24.00

0

0.00

0

12.90

0

0.00

5

0

0

0

Dec 2014

13.00

1

0.00

5

0.00

0

0.00

4

0

20

0

Total 2014

144.48

0

380.00

9

23.00

0

0.00

228

74

34

0

Jan 2015

7.00

0

0.00

0

0.00

19

143.10

8

0

0

140

Feb 2015

0.00

0

0.00

17

57.45

13

66.30

7

0

73

71

Mar 2015

0.00

0

0.00

26

67.60

4

19.55

14

0

91

26

Apr 2015

0.00

0

0.00

0

0.00

16

86.60

10

0

0

109

Total 2015

7.00

0

0.00

43

125.05

52

315.55

39

0

164

346

Total 2014 to 2015

151.48

1

380

52

148.05

52

315.55

267

74

198

346



Figure 9.4: Geological Map of Adumbi and Adumbi West Areas showing Artisanal Activities

9.2.4 Trenching

Re-excavation of an 850 m long colonial trench was commenced in August 2014, aimed at exposing lithologies for lithostructural mapping purposes. Selective sampling was also carried out in places where a significant alteration was observed (see Figure 9.5). Trenching was however suspended in September 2014 due to continued sidewall collapse and repeated cleaning and clearing efforts required after heavy rainfalls.

A total 301 m was cleaned/reopened, and 74 samples were collected. Sampling was not carried out where no significant alteration was observed, or where the trench was deemed unsafe.

The main lithologies observed are quartz carbonate schist and chlorite schist, totally oxidised with weak foliation parallel veins of quartz ranging from 0.5 cm to 25 cm wide. The BIF unit targeted was not intersected, and no major altered or sheared zones were encountered prior to suspending the programme. The foliation and quartz veins have an average strike of 310° and dip mostly at approximately 70° to the NE.


Figure 9.5: Adumbi West Prospect - Trench Mapping and Sampling


9.2.5 Pitting

A total of 52 pits on selected induced polarisation (IP) lines at 80 m intervals were dug in the Adumbi West, Adumbi South, Vatican and Senegal areas. The pits were designed to assist with the interpretation of responses from the underlying soil geochemistry and IP signatures, and to further the understanding of regolith patterns and distribution in these areas and the wider Imbo Project area. All the pits were vertically channelled, with the different regolith horizons and saprolite sampled separately.

The pit logging showed that many of the previous soil samples would have been taken within the transported horizon, despite being sampled at a depth of 1 m. Although the current programme suggests that some of the transported material may be proximal, this is not always the case. The possibility therefore exists that the soil results are locally (a) giving false anomalies, or (b) not detecting the underlying mineralisation.

The pitting programme demonstrated the complexity of the regolith in the Adumbi area and supports the conclusion from the radiometric and ICP data that a large proportion of the area is overlain by transported soil.

9.2.6 Topographical Survey

All the Adumbi drillhole collars, trenches and accessible adits and adit portals were accurately surveyed, and the data appropriately georeferenced. In addition, all the accessible underground excavations and workings were accurately surveyed.

Survey work commenced in late July 2014. Coordinates were based on the existing reference control points, which were corrected and re-fixed by a consulting surveyor from Map Africa, RSA. The three control beacons are located inside the Adumbi base camp and have the final adopted coordinate system as shown in Table 9.7, UTM (Zone 35 North) based on WGS 84.

Table 9.7: Adumbi Prospect Survey Control Points

PID

East-UTM

North-UTM

Elevation

Code

14MRSCM

596523.35

191570.88

649.6

10IPIC

14SCM1

596620.47

191457.32

644.39

10IPIC

14SCM2

596669.84

191500.62

646.41

10IPIC

9.2.6.1 Drill Collar Survey

The drillholes were surveyed by measuring the collar position on the concreted surface as shown in Figure 9.6. All the Adumbi and Canal drillholes (with the exception of abandoned holes) were surveyed, and all the data was saved in Loncor's survey computer.


Figure 9.6: Adumbi Deposit - Survey of Drillhole Collars

The old and new drill collar positions are shown in plan view in Figure 9.7. The following maximum differences are seen between the data sets: X = 11.20 m, Y = 10.90 m, and Z = 52.55 m.


Figure 9.7: Comparison of Drillhole Collar Locations using Old and New Survey

9.2.6.2 Adit Survey

All the known adits in the Adumbi deposit were surveyed by DGPS R10 and total station S3 DR. These included the seven adits which were sampled and used for resource calculations (see Figure 9.8).


Figure 9.8: Adumbi Deposit - Adit Locations Map

The survey measurements were taken by fixing the entrance (portal) of the adits, followed by surveys inside the adits of the floor, roof, and side walls wherever possible (see Figure 9.9). Intersection points in the adits of crosscuts, reef drives, etc. were also surveyed, in order to aid the georeferencing of the existing underground geological maps.


Figure 9.9: Adumbi Deposit - Adit Surveying

All the final survey coordinates for the Adumbi adits were saved in Loncor's survey computer.

Following the accurate surveying of the 10 historical adits and appropriate georeferencing, the 796 adit samples (1,121 m in total), when applied, should have positive implications on the data spacing and classification of any future mineral resources.

9.2.6.3 Trench Survey

Surveys were carried out by locating the outlines and elevation in order to determine the shape and the original ground surface along the excavated trench. Some trenches however were damaged, either by backfilling or artisanal activities, and therefore made it difficult to accurately determine the original positions.

With the Adumbi drillhole collars, trenches, and accessible adits/portals as well as accessible underground excavations and workings now accurately surveyed and the data appropriately georeferenced, the new and improved quality of the exploration data will have positive implications on potential future classifications of the mineral resources.

9.2.7 Underground Exploration

The only underground exploration activity undertaken during the post-2014 exploration campaign was the surveying and georeferencing of the adits.

9.2.8 Airborne Geophysics Survey

IP and LiDAR (light detection and ranging) were the only geophysical surveys conducted during the post-2014 exploration campaign.


9.2.9 Induced Polarisation (IP) Surveys

An initial pole-dipole (PDP) orientation survey was undertaken over the known mineralisation, the results of which warranted a systematic PDP survey of sections in other prospective areas in order to generate drilling targets, in particular the Adumbi West prospect.

The IP equipment and operators, who were on loan from another company for three months, arrived on site on October 17, 2015, to commence the programme, which was completed on June 16, 2016.

9.2.9.1 Pole-Dipole Methodology

Unlike gradient array surveys, which measure near-surface resistivity and chargeability responses, the PDP method delivers greater depth penetration and cross-sectional data.

The PDP array is conceptually straight forward and works by applying an electric current to the earth using two electrode pots: the moving electrode pot, located 50 m from the starting point, and the infinity pot, which remains stationary and is located 2 km south of the starting point (transmitter). The moving electrode pot moves along the survey line, keeping a distance of 50 m from the infinity pot, and readings at the receiver are taken at 50 m intervals.

The receiver is connected to a series of eleven electrode pots via a multi-conductor electrical cable along the survey line. The transmitter and generator are fixed permanently at a convenient location in the centre of the survey lines. The electrical wires are connected to the transmitter and transmit current to the ground when connected to the electrode pot. The receiver simultaneously records the primary voltage, resistivity, and chargeability of the underlying rock formations.

9.2.9.2 Pole-Dipole Survey

Three lines were selected for survey at Adumbi (AWL02, AEL02, and AEL06). This array covered the central part of the main Adumbi deposit and is considered to be the most representative of the Adumbi styles of mineralisation. In each case, lines were extended to the southwest beyond the known subsurface geology, to cover a broad untested geochemical anomaly striking parallel to the regional trend of approximately 310° to 315°.

9.2.9.3 Pole-Dipole Results

The chargeability and resistivity data is presented in 3D in Figure 9.10). A high-chargeability structure is present in the Adumbi area, and is coincident with the mineralised zone. However, in the Canal and Mabele Mokonzi areas, the mineralisation appears to follow a different structure which is situated in the footwall and hanging wall of the high-chargeability structure, respectively.


Significant observations from the new data are summarised in Figure 9.11, and include the following:

  • The Adumbi mineralised structure is again associated with a resistivity low, a feature noted on all the other lines to the southeast, to the end of the Canal zone.
  • There are elevated chargeability values in the interpreted position of the high-chargeability structure, similar in tenor to the other lines from Adumbi to Canal.
  • A high-chargeability anomaly is present on Lines AWL13 and AWL 17, which is coincident with the Adumbi South magnetic lineament, interpreted to be a continuation of the Kitenge structure. There is a coincident resistivity high on Line AWL17.
  • Extremely high chargeability values occur towards the SW end of Line AWL17. However, there is no trace of elevated chargeability values on strike to the SE on Line AWL13, and the cause of the anomaly is unknown.
  • Lines AWL59 to AWL67 confirm the earlier observations that the metabasalt terrain is characterised by lower chargeability and resistivity values than the metasediments.

A Chargeability

B Resistivity

Green Mineralised Zone 2

Purple Mineralised Zone 3

Black Carbonaceous Marker

Figure 9.10: Pole-Dipole Voxels for Adumbi and Adumbi West


A Chargeability

B Resistivity

Figure 9.11: Pole-Dipole Results and the Adumbi, Mabele Mokonzi and Adumbi West Areas, Overlain on the Magnetics (Reduced-to-Pole)

9.2.10 Gradient Array Data

Given the fact that the sectional PDP IP data proved to be very useful in the structural interpretation of the Adumbi area, a gradient array IP was planned in order to provide chargeability and resistivity data in plan view. The gradient array surveys were carried out on 1 km × 1 km blocks, with a 50 m line spacing and a station spacing of 25 m along the lines. The layout of the gradient array grid, transmitter, injection points, receiver and electrodes (pots) is shown in Figure 9.12.


Figure 9.12: Gradient Array IP Layout

The gradient array (GA) survey was completed, and processed data was received from Spectral Geophysics (see Figure 9.13).


NOTE: Drillhole collars in blue

Figure 9.13: IP Coverage on the Imbo Project

Chargeability and resistivity maps of the GA data are shown in Figure 9.14A and Figure 9.14B, respectively. The chargeability map shows a prominent high associated with the Adumbi and Canal mineralisation, stretching from the Mambo Bado fault in Block 4 to the Vatican fault in Block 1. The continuity of the chargeability high into Block 2 is disrupted by the Vatican fault and its associated splays but is clearly defined in Block 3 in the hanging wall of the Kitenge mineralisation.


A Chargeability

B Resistivity

Figure 9.14: Gradient Array IP Maps for the Adumbi-Kitenge Area


The resistivity map shows a low associated with the best-developed section of the Adumbi mineralisation, but unlike the PDP resistivity data, this does not continue southeastwards into Canal. The other patchy resistivity lows (see Figure 9.15B) are not associated with known mineralisation and are probably lithological in origin. A linear resistivity high is present immediately southwest of the Adumbi low, which appears to extend to Canal and continue up to the Vatican fault. If this represents the same continuous zone, it supports the hypothesis that Canal does not represent the direct strike extension of Adumbi. The Kitenge prospect is associated with a GA resistivity high and is possibly the faulted equivalent of the Canal zone.

The main GA chargeability and resistivity features are overlain on the PDP data in Figure 9.15A and Figure 9.15B, respectively. Although there is a broad correlation between the two data sets, there are clear discrepancies. For example, in the Canal area, the chargeability high from the GA diverges from the high defined by the PDP sections, and in the northwest of Block 4, there is a clear displacement between the GA and PDP chargeability highs. For the resistivity data, the most obvious discrepancy is in the Canal area, where the mineralisation is represented by a well-defined low in the PDP sections, but as a relative high on the GA map.

The differences between the two data sets are principally due to the fact that the GA layout measures the IP properties of the rocks at relatively shallow depths below surface (approximately 40 m to 70 m) whereas the PDP array provides a profile of the IP response to a depth of approximately 200 m. In areas of relatively deep weathering, the GA will respond to the shallower saprolite, compared to the deeper parts of the PDP profile where minerals such as sulphides are unoxidised. It is therefore concluded that in moderately to deeply weathered areas with poor exposure, the GA is a useful tool for generating a basic map to assist with the early stages of exploration. The PDP array is more suitable for locating chargeability and resistivity anomalies for drill testing and assisting with the more detailed structural interpretation of the area.

It is recommended that, in future, all IP data be assessed by a geophysical consultant to confirm and expand upon the current in-house interpretations.


A Chargeability

B Resistivity

Figure 9.15: Gradient Array Anomalies Superimposed on the PDP at the 500 m RL


9.2.11 LiDAR Survey

Per RPA's recommendation, a LiDAR survey was completed over Adumbi by Southern Mapping of South Africa. The survey was carried out from January 17 to January 24, 2020, as part of a large programme covering the Ngayu Kibali areas encompassing the Imbo Project area (see Figure 9.16).

NOTE: The surveyed project areas are approximately 48.749 ha.

Figure 9.16: Imbo Project - Locality Map

The topographical survey was undertaken to produce rectified colour images and a digital terrain model (DTM) of the surveyed project area. The survey was carried out using an aircraft-mounted LiDAR system that scanned the ground below with a 125 kHz laser frequency rate, resulting in a dense DTM of the ground surface and objects above the ground. Digital colour images were also taken from the aircraft and rectified to produce colour orthophotos of the surveyed project area. The survey was flown at a height of approximately 750 m and ortho images with a 7 cm pixel resolution were produced.

The following equipment was used:

  • Aircraft:  Cessna F406 (ZS-SSY)

  • LiDAR Scanner: Optech Orion M300 (12SEN306)
  • Camera: iXU RS-1000 Phase One

Ground control points were placed and surveyed by Loncor, and their coordinate values were used for the vertical and horizontal checks on the full aerial LiDAR survey. The coordinate system is in WGS 84 UTM 35N.

The following information was supplied to Loncor following completion of the survey:

  • CAD design files in Microstation DGN, DWG and DXF format showing the following:
  • Orthophoto tiles (1,400 m × 1,400 m) and LiDAR point block (1,500 m × 1,500 m) layout
  • Contours at 0.5 m, 1 m and 2 m intervals
  • The surveyed project area with boundaries
  • The contours have been smoothed and are merely an aesthetic representation of the ground shape.
  • Ortho-rectified aerial images in ECW (enhanced compression wavelet) format with a 7 cm pixel resolution
  • Full LiDAR points in LAS1.4 format with the feature classes shown in Table 9.8
  • The LiDAR survey report by Southern Mapping of South Africa

Table 9.8: LiDAR Classification Values

Classification Value

Meaning

1

Unclassified

2

Ground

3

Low Vegetation (0.5 m to 2 m)

4

Medium Vegetation (2 m to 5 m)

5

High Vegetation (> 5 m)

All the above data is in the WGS 84 UTM35N coordinate system, with orthometric heights as calculated in TerraScan using the EGM1996 and EGM2008 geoidal models.

The LiDAR data will be interpreted to aid in structural and regolith mapping.

9.2.12 Relative Density (RD) Measurements

RD measurements on the Adumbi drill core were previously determined by ALS Chemex in Johannesburg and by an analytical laboratory in Vancouver as shown in Figure 9.17; however, major discrepancies existed between the two data sets, and in many cases the reported RD values were very different from what was expected from the drilled lithologies. RPA questioned the reliability of one or both data sets and advised a comprehensive review of the results.


Figure 9.17: Comparison of Relative Densities from Laboratories for Drillhole SADD0019

Given the critical role reliable RD values play in resource estimation and mine planning, it was deemed necessary to carry out systematic measurements on all the Adumbi drill core. All RD measurements were undertaken on site following the summarised procedure below:

  • Measure the RD at 1 m intervals in the mineralised zones.
  • Measure the RD at 2 m intervals outside the mineralised zones.
  • To avoid sampling bias, take the first piece of core after the metre mark weighing > 200 g.
  • Dry all the samples completely in an oven, before coating with varnish to prevent water absorption during weighing.
  • Take the measurements using an Archimedes balance, using the sample weights in air and water.
  • QC procedures involve re-weighing after water immersion to ensure that the varnish coating has been effective, and that no significant absorption of water has taken place. Disregard any measurements where > 1 % water has been absorbed, and repeat the procedure using the next piece of core in the core tray.

A total of 5,385 samples were collected, 25 of which failed the QC criteria due to the fact that they were highly friable and could not be properly sealed with varnish.


The RD programme was thus completed, with a total of 5,360 measurements taken. The average RDs for all the oxide, transition and sulphide zone samples are shown in Table 9.9, and the measurements for mineralised (≥ 0.5 g/t Au) and unmineralised (< 0.5 g/t Au) rock are compared in Table 9.10. The average oxide, transition and sulphide zone RDs for mineralised rock are 2.45, 2.82 and 3.05, respectively.

Table 9.9: Summary of all RD Measurements on Adumbi Core

Type

Total

Pass

Fail

% Fail

RD All

RD Pass

RD Fail

Oxide

1,406

1,384

22

1.56

2.26

2.26

2.38

Transition

829

826

3

0.36

2.59

2.59

2.34

Sulphide

3,150

3,150

0

0

2.91

2.91

-

Total

5,385

5,360

25

0.46

2.69

2.69

2.38

Table 9.10: Summary of RD Measurements in Mineralised and Unmineralised Rock

Type

Mineralised

Unmineralised

No. of Samples*

RD

No. of Samples*

RD

Oxide

297

2.45

882

2.26

Transition

178

2.82

601

2.54

Sulphide

796

3.05

1,953

2.83

* Excludes samples which were not assayed

The RD figures used by RPA for their 2014 NI 43-101 report were 1.8, 2.2, and 3.0 for the oxide, transition and sulphide zones, respectively. These were based on readings taken by Kilo staff using a water immersion method (no details provided), but only seven readings were taken in the oxide zone. It is also apparent from the re-logging exercise that the previous determinations of the oxide, transition and sulphide zone boundaries were very inaccurate. As a result, the base of complete oxidation (BOCO) used by RPA is up to 75 m too shallow (see Figure 9.18), which has resulted in an insignificant oxide resource in RPA's estimate for Adumbi (29,000 oz Au).


Figure 9.18: Comparison of the RPA Oxidation Levels with the Current Study

The average RD values for mineralised rock are 2.45, 2.82, and 3.05 for the oxide, transition and fresh material, respectively. The large differences between these figures and those used by RPA (i.e. 1.8, 2.2, and 3.0) are mainly due to the fact that (a) only seven oxide samples were previously used to derive the average RD for the oxide zone, and (b) the previous logging of the oxide and fresh rock boundaries were very inaccurate.

The values of 2.45 and 2.90 are relatively high compared to saprolite and saprock in general (see Table 9.11). However, the mineralisation at Adumbi is mostly in the BIF, which when oxidised consists of iron oxides interbanded with unweathered chert, rather than the leached, clay-rich assemblage of typical saprolite.


Table 9.11: Average RDs for the Different Lithologies at Adumbi

Lithology

Logging
Code

Oxide RD

Transition RD

Sulphide RD

No.

RD
Mineralised

RD
Unmineralised

No.

RD
Mineralised

RD
Unmineralised

No.

RD
Mineralised

RD
Unmineralised

Banded Chert

BCH

2

2.35

2.40

28

2.86

2.93

27

3.11

3.04

Banded Iron Formation

BIF

508

2.45

2.54

226

2.88

2.83

775

3.12

3.10

Carbonaceous Schist

CBS

76

2.32

2.20

51

2.47

2.52

261

2.94

2.89

Carbonaceous Marker

CBS-AS

7

2.52

2.48

20

2.81

2.53

70

3.03

2.89

Chlorite Schist

CS

28

2.22

2.62

65

2.88

2.91

231

3.08

3.01

Interbedded Carbonate Schist and Quartz Carbonate Schist

IQCS and ICQS

131

2.34

2.11

97

2.53

2.40

445

2.94

2.78

Quartz Carbonate Schist

QCS

549

2.49

2.04

278

2.48

2.31

1,078

2.92

2.77

Quartz Vein

QV

55

2.55

2.54

40

2.66

2.58

137

2.84

2.79

Replaced Rock

RP

49

2.38

-

25

2.89

3.00

95

3.08

3.02



The increase in the sample population, coupled with the application of a more rigid RD determination procedure based on recommendations from the RPA 2014 NI 43-101, indicates that the new RD measurements from both mineralised and unmineralised material and from the various material types and lithological units have improved the confidence in the RD determination to be applied to any resource estimates (see Table 9.12). Table 9.13 indicates a positive variance between the previous model RD and the reviewed work for the oxide and transition materials.

Table 9.12: Average RD Measurements for Mineralised Zones 1, 2, 3 and 4
(RP Zone not yet separated)

Type

Average RD

Zone 1

Zone 2

Zone 3

Zone 4

Oxide

2.48

2.41

2.57

2.48

Transition

3.01

2.90

2.80

2.71

Sulphide

3.08

3.09

3.00

3.04

Table 9.13: Summary of Previous and Reviewed Mineralised Average RD Measurements

Material Type

RD used in Previous RPA
Model

Additional RD
Determinations

RD Variance
(%)

Oxide

1.80

2.45

36.1

Transition

2.20

2.82

28.2

Sulphide

3.00

3.05

1.7

9.3 2020 TO 2021 EXPLORATION

During the period 2020 to 2021, exploration activities planned for the Imbo Project covered Imbo East.

The programme focused on soil sampling in tandem with geological mapping and sampling of rock chips from outcrops and floats, trenching and channel sampling. A total of 245 rock chip samples, 2,157 soil samples (including field duplicates) from 77.50 km, 126 trench samples from 421.90 m, and 134 channel samples from 175.10 m were collected (see Table 9.14).


Table 9.14: Summary of Imbo East Exploration Statistics (2020 to 2021)

Month

Activity

Number of Samples

Gridding

(km)

Trench

Adit

Other Channels

Soil

Rocks

Trench

Adit

Other
Channels

Number

Metres

Number

Metres

Number

Metres

Jan 2020

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

13

0

0

0

Feb 2020

0

0

0

0

0

9

71

0

39

0

0

73

Mar 2020

31.64

0

0

0

0

4

12.6

634

39

0

0

13

Apr 2020

39.44

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,269

122

0

0

0

May 2020

0

2

225

0

0

6

44.80

0

2

56

0

24

Jun 2020

0.96

5

196.90

0

0

8

46.70

26

19

70

0

24

July 2020

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Aug 2020

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Sept 2020

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Oct 2020

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Nov 2020

2.60

0

0

0

0

0

0

71

8

0

0

0

Dec 2020

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Total 2020

74.64

7

421.90

0

0

27

175.10

2,000

242

126

0

134

2021

2.86

0

0

0

0

0

0

157

3

0

0

0

Total

77.50

7

421.90

0

0

27

175.10

2,157

245

126

0

134

Analytical results have been received for all soil samples from the completed 5.4 km × 2.3 km grid, east of the Imbo River where soil samples were collected every 40 m on lines 160 m apart. Geological mapping, soil geochemical, rock chips and channel sampling of old colonial trenches and artisanal workings have outlined four significant mineralised trends - Esio Wapi, Museveni, Mungu Iko and Paradis - approximately 8 km to 10 km southeast of the Adumbi deposit (see Figure 7.2 and Figure 9.19).

At Esio Wapi, the soil geochemical results have outlined a number of +130 ppb Au in soil anomalies with a maximum value of 2,230 ppb Au over a 1.9 km long mineralised trend (see Figure 9.19). Channel sample results from old colonial workings included 19.80 m grading 1.58 g/t Au (open to the northeast), 8 m grading 1.11 g/t Au, and 5.0 m grading 1.65 g/t Au in brecciated BIF and metasediment. Individual rock sample values included 15.10 g/t and 7.88 g/t Au in the quartz veins, 6.39 g/t and 3.08 g/t Au in the BIF, and 9.06 g/t, 7.91 g/t and 3.24 g/t Au in the metasediments.

On the Paradis trend, the soil sample results have outlined a broad 1.0 km trend (+130 ppb Au) with a maximum value of 1,070 ppb Au. Significant channel samples along the Paradis trend include 6.8 m grading 5.44 g/t Au (open to the southwest) in metasediments with quartz veins. Individual rock sample values included 22.40 g/t, 5.84 g/t, and 2.31 g/t Au in the quartz veins.

On the Museveni mineralised trend, anomalous soil samples and artisanal workings occur over a strike of 3.2 km with a maximum value of 5,850 ppb Au in the soils. Channel samples from the artisanal workings include 6.0 m grading 4.37 g/t Au and 1.40 m grading 62.10 g/t Au and represent high-grade quartz veins in the metasediment. Individual rock sample values included 53.90 g/t, 32.80 g/t, and 32.60 g/t Au in the quartz veins and 18.10 g/t Au in the metasediment.


On the Mungu Iko trend, soil samples have outlined a 3.1 km long mineralised trend (+130 ppb Au) with a maximum value of 1,540 ppb Au. Individual rock sample values include 12.30 g/t and 3.50 g/t Au in the brecciated BIF, 14.20 g/t, 4.81 g/t, and 3.68 g/t Au in the metasediments, and 1.97 g/t Au in the quartz veins. Further mapping is required to determine whether the eastern part of the Mungu Iko trend represents a faulted extension of the Esio Wapi trend.

Situated approximately 9 km from the key deposit of Adumbi on the eastern part of the Imbo Project, additional infill soil sampling, augering and channel sampling will be undertaken at Esio Wapi, Paradis, Museveni and Mungu Iko to better define these mineralised trends prior to outlining drill targets.

Figure 9.19: Soil Geochemical Trends with Colonial/Artisanal Workings and Channel Samples


10 DRILLING

10.1 PRE-2014 DRILLING

Historical work on the Imbo Project included three diamond drillholes completed by BRGM in 1980. Neither this drilling nor any historical trenching or underground sampling by Belgian explorers and operators has been included in the Kilo drillhole databases.

As of November 15, 2013, Kilo had completed 167 diamond drillholes totalling 35,400 m on the Imbo Project (see Table 10.1).

Table 10.1: 2010 to 2013 Drill Programme Summary of Imbo Project

Year

Prospect or Deposit

No. of Holes Drilled

Metres Drilled

2010

Adumbi

31

6,301

2010

Canal

1

304

2010

Kitenge

5

1,716

2010

Manzako

3

1,016

2010

Monde Arabe

1

302

2010 Subtotal

41

9,639

2011

Adumbi

18

2,859

2011

Canal

4

470

2011

Kitenge

4

789

2011

Vatican

3

843

2011

Manzako

2

276

2011 Subtotal

31

5,237

2012

Canal

3

387

2012

Kitenge

28

6,101

2012

Senegal

2

420

2012

Manzako

18

3,641

2012

Lion

1

204

2012 Subtotal

52

10,753

2013

Kitenge

20

5,581

2013

Senegal

4

772

2013

Manzako

19

3,420

2013 Subtotal

33

9773

Prospect or Deposit

Subtotal:

 

 

 

Adumbi (including Canal)

57

10,321

Kitenge (including Senegal)

63

15,379

Manzako (including Lion)

43

8,555

Monde Arabe

1

302

Vatican

3

843

TOTAL

 

167

35,400

NOTES:
1. Excludes 63.4 m in SADD0023A as deflection to SADD0023
2. Numbers might not add up due to rounding.



The 2010 and 2011 drilling campaigns were carried out under contract with Senex SPRL, a DRC subsidiary of the drilling company Geosearch, utilising two helicopter-portable Longyear 38 diamond drill rigs. Drilling commenced with PQ-sized drill rods (to produce an 85 mm diameter core). Once the upper weathered zone and fractured formations had been drilled, the drill rod was reduced to HQ-sized core (63 mm diameter core) through the transition zone from highly weathered and/or oxidised units to fresh unweathered competent rocks. The fresh rock was drilled with NQ-sized drill rods, producing a 48 mm diameter core. The drill site preparation was generally completed manually, although a bulldozer was used on accessible sites. Rehabilitation of the sites was carried out by Senex SPRL. Concrete markers were erected on all the drillhole collars.

From 2012, drilling was performed by Congo Core ETS, a DRC based drilling company, utilising two Zinex A-5 drill rigs (Kilo's bulldozer was used for all rig movements). Drilling commenced with HQ-sized drill rods and was reduced to NQ-sized drill rods in the fresh rock. The drill site preparation was generally completed by bulldozer. Rehabilitation of the drill sites was carried out by Kilo and Congo Core ETS. Concrete markers were erected on all the drillhole collars.

Core recovery was generally exceptionally good (> 95 %) in the mineralised sections and unweathered rock while recovery in the saprolite dropped to approximately 50 %.

Table 10.2 summarises the significant drill intercepts for the Adumbi deposit.

Table 10.2: Significant Drill Intercepts from the Adumbi Deposit

BHID From
(m)
To
(m)
Intercept Width
(m)
True Width
(m)
Grade
(g/t Au)
SADD0001 151.6 155.6 4 3.9 2.34
166.6 173.5 6.9 5.27 3.67
200 227.6 27.6 20.37 2.56
SADD0003 124.75 159.55 34.8 22.23 3.05
169.75 176.75 7 5.03 2.78
245.75 259.25 13.5 10.11 2.89
SADD0004 145.2 152.77 7.57 4.89 3.35
162.6 180.1 17.5 13.65 6.42
267.75 271.15 3.4 2.67 4.08
SADD0005 116.3 126.8 10.5 6.62 2.99
130.5 162.5 32 29.11 2.45
177.55 193.88 16.33 11.49 1.44
SADD0008 178.8 183.1 4.3 3.24 3.07
SADD0011 18.6 25.8 7.2 4.54 2.33
SADD0015 30.3 38.5 8.2 7.07 1.35
125.75 135.73 9.98 7.48 1.38
148.86 169.7 20.84 16.4 4.95
SADD0016 0.5 61.6 61.1 21.19 2.09
86.95 136.8 49.85 25.51 4.29
SADD0017 165.2 174.15 8.95 6.3 1.33



BHID From
(m)
To
(m)
Intercept Width
(m)
True Width
(m)
Grade
(g/t Au)

 

266.7

309.6

42.9

34.2

3.78

316.44

329.19

12.75

10.07

2.05

SADD0019

87.4

93.6

6.2

4.94

2.26

174.58

183.78

9.2

8.46

1.54

189.1

244.1

55

34.7

1.11

251.94

257.13

5.19

3.91

3.67

SADD0021

9.5

16.7

7.2

5.61

2.58

45.33

55.46

10.13

7.1

1.76

62.9

76.4

13.5

9.81

2.52

SADD0022

140.72

145.55

4.83

2.7

1.42

157.1

163.04

5.94

3.97

1.28

198.46

220.7

22.24

14.85

1.31

242.8

272.5

29.7

21.62

3.50

SADD0024

8.2

15.3

7.1

4.51

2.37

SADD0025

30

48.85

18.85

13.34

2.59

SADD0026

155.34

186

30.66

20.7

5.52

203.5

208.1

4.6

3.61

5.87

SADD0027

113.9

120.8

6.9

4.99

1.12

140.5

151.35

10.85

7.68

1.31

161.3

181.7

20.4

14.9

1.26

191

224.09

33.09

24.64

1.81

236.9

239.7

2.8

2.06

2.86

SADD0028

146.35

174.7

28.35

19.39

1.49

222

251.22

29.22

21.84

2.22

SADD0029

22.23

42.3

20.07

16

1.40

SADD0030

101.7

112.83

11.13

7.66

1.81

123.17

142.3

19.13

14.16

2.12

205.06

214.01

8.95

6.3

11.55

SADD0031

19.4

39.5

20.1

13.41

1.42

57.3

60.3

3

2.28

31.40

SADD0034

107.7

126

18.3

12.29

6.26

138.4

142

3.6

2.12

4.23

SADD0035

24.4

41.9

17.5

11.75

2.16

SADD0037

89

99.15

10.15

6.39

1.34

SADD0038

71.8

80.4

8.6

5.52

5.70

SADD0039

104.9

116.9

12

8.65

3.93

147.9

152.8

4.9

3.88

3.87

SADD0041

21.9

25

3.1

2.21

3.34

159.88

165.68

5.8

3.61

4.23

SADD0042

247.9

249.9

2

1.87

2.48

SADD0043

33.3

53.45

20.15

12.67

1.66

SADD0044

93.16

103.9

10.74

7.4

7.23




BHID From
(m)
To
(m)
Intercept Width
(m)
True Width
(m)
Grade
(g/t Au)

 

108

132.64

24.64

17.31

1.83

SADD0045

124.45

127.1

2.65

1.92

2.55

SADD0047

56.46

59.7

3.24

2.36

3.05

102.95

105.5

2.55

1.68

11.81

SADD0049

64.2

84.21

20.01

8.35

4.22

89.83

94.37

4.54

1.89

3.78

109.11

139.53

30.42

13.82

1.29

227.37

231

3.63

2.06

3.47

SCDD0001

33.4

46

12.6

7.97

7.71

SCDD0002

120.9

123

2.1

1.52

2.54

SCDD0003

51.75

54.75

3

1.79

3.71

61.6

63.8

2.2

1.48

3.05

SCDD0004

59

65.35

6.35

4.61

4.08

SCDD0006

78.1

83.6

5.5

3.83

2.47

86.25

97.7

11.45

6.93

3.26

Table 10.3 and Table 10.4 show the significant intercepts for the Kitenge and Manzako deposits, respectively.

Table 10.3: Significant Drill Intercepts from the Kitenge Deposit

Hole ID

From
(m)

To
(m)

Intercept Width
(m)

Grade
(g/t Au)

SKDD0001

30.00

36.00

6.00

2.46

SKDD0003

133.50

136.80

3.30

6.71

SKDD0004

116.95

119.05

2.10

3.94

SKDD0017

100.15

105.84

5.69

1.62

SKDD0018

70.85

72.72

1.87

28.08

SKDD0019

46.19

48.65

2.46

3.42

SKDD0021

78.20

84.00

5.80

42.24

SKDD0022

71.35

74.30

2.95

9.19

SKDD0024

189.92

192.00

2.08

1.97

SKDD0027

149.65

150.95

1.30

3.31

SKDD0029

112.24

116.88

4.64

1.09

SKDD0030

152.70

160.50

7.80

11.47

SKDD0031

114.07

116.55

2.48

4.23

SKDD0035

167.70

168.55

0.85

118.09

SKDD0045

219.20

221.60

2.40

2.75

SKDD0051

245.62

247.60

1.98

10.00

SKDD0053

258.81

261.00

2.19

17.24

SKDD0054

103.54

109.36

5.82

2.21




Hole ID

From
(m)

To
(m)

Intercept Width
(m)

Grade
(g/t Au)

SKDD0057

178.10

179.25

1.15

31.48

SSDD0001

14.50

17.80

3.30

2.49

SSDD0005

92.45

93.15

0.70

48.75

NOTE: Interval thickness can be taken as indicative of the true thickness as the deposit is vertical to subvertical.

Table 10.4: Significant Drill Intercepts from the Manzako Deposit

Hole ID

From
(m)

To
(m)

Intercept Width
(m)

Grade
(g/t Au)

SMDD0002

25.15

25.9

0.75

7.93

94.6

99

4.4

10.08

SMDD0003

147.5

149.8

2.3

2.71

217.43

218.8

1.37

5.49

236.8

243.36

6.56

6.25

282.43

284.05

1.62

5.84

SMDD0004

19.3

30.5

11.2

4.96

SMDD0005

114.68

115.8

1.12

1.26

118.3

128.34

10.04

1.24

SMDD0008

74.85

77.85

3.8

168.2

SMDD0009

83.55

87.85

4.3

43.04

SMDD0014

54.25

57.95

3.7

2.29

100.2

102.1

1.9

7.34

179.15

180.3

1.15

12.46

SMDD0016

180.8

182.3

1.5

5.12

SMDD0017

81

83.7

2.7

6.68

103.75

112.9

9.55

2.72

SMDD0018

126.83

129.4

4.07

17.25

 

142.35

143

0.65

6.72

SMDD0019

183.3

184.45

1.15

8.54

SMDD0020

53.81

56.7

2.89

2.69

100.15

102.15

2

23.46

SMDD0021

45.55

47.35

1.8

2.1

SMDD0022

109.55

111.7

2.15

3.34

SMDD0023

65.3

72

6.7

3.99

 

38.45

41.5

3.05

3.39

SMDD0024

43

43.8

0.8

3.42

73.05

73.45

0.4

11.4

SMDD0025

68.1

70.9

2.8

3.77

SMDD0026

83.5

86.25

2.75

6.52

SMDD0027

164.12

166.2

2.08

7.15




Hole ID

From
(m)

To
(m)

Intercept Width
(m)

Grade
(g/t Au)

SMDD0028

65.05

66.55

1.5

1.54

91.16

94.75

3.59

5.99

SMDD0029

16.34

19.3

2.96

3.54

25.95

26.9

0.95

2.38

34.95

37.95

3

3.19

58.11

58.61

0.5

6.1

67.55

68.1

0.55

67.5

SMDD0034

67.05

67.75

0.7

3.98

149.6

150.15

0.55

9.98

172.6

173.23

0.63

355.24

SMDD0035

87.17

88.2

1.03

15.24

58.2

64.34

6.14

2.56

SMDD0039

189.8

193.1

3.3

6.54

10.1.1 Collar Surveys

Drillhole collar locations were determined in the field with a handheld Garmin 60CSx GPS (WGS 84 UTM Zone 35N coordinates) by Kilo geologists. A compass was used to establish a line oriented with respect to magnetic north to indicate the drillhole azimuth. Once the drill rig was moved onto the drill pad and set up, the orientation of the drillhole was verified with a clinometer and compass by a geologist.

Drillhole, trench, and adit portal elevations at Adumbi were derived from a satellite DTM as handheld GPS elevations were notoriously inaccurate due to the thick jungle canopy.

In the summer of 2013, Young, Stuart & Associates (YSA) of South Africa was appointed by Kilo to establish survey control points at the Adumbi base camp and conduct a tachometric survey of drillholes, section lines, baselines and trenches in the Imbo Project area.

10.1.2 Drillhole Downhole Survey

During the 2010 and 2011 drilling campaigns, downhole survey data was collected at 15 m intervals using a FlexIT survey tool with a digital readout. Since 2012, downhole survey data has been collected at 15 m intervals using a Reflex EZ TRAC survey tool with a digital readout. The data was digitally stored and downloaded by Kilo geologists to a Kilo computer.


10.1.3 Drillhole Database

RPA received and conducted an extensive review and validation of the drillhole database, which was in an MS Excel format, and concluded the following:

  • Adumbi Drillhole Database:
  • Contains 87 records consisting of 57 diamond drillholes, 20 surface trenches, and 10 underground channel sample lines (represented as drillholes in the database), totalling 12,616 m. Drilling accounts for 82 % of the total length.
  • Contains 9,672 samples encompassing 12,495 m for 7,812 assays above the detection limit.
  • Kitenge Drillhole Database:
  • Contains 69 records consisting of 63 diamond drillholes, 5 surface trenches, and 1 road cutting (represented as drillholes in the database), for a total of 16,268 m. Kilo drilling accounts for 95 % of the total length.
  • Contains 12,140 samples encompassing 14,557 m for 9,356 assays above the detection limit.
  • Manzako Drillhole Database:
  • Contains 58 records consisting of 43 diamond drillholes, and 15 surface trenches, for a total of 9,698 m. Drilling accounts for 88 % of the total length.
  • Contains 7,154 samples encompassing 9,000.84 m for 4,143 assays above the detection limit.

10.2 2014 TO 2017 DRILLING

10.2.1 Planning

A drilling programme was planned to test the gold-in-soil and magnetic anomalies at the Adumbi South, Adumbi West and Kitenge Extension targets, the locations of which are shown in Figure 10.1. The planned programme comprised 63 drillholes totalling approximately 8,900 m and was carried out by Orezone Drilling SARL based in Watsa in the DRC.

The programme employed one track-mounted rig (commencing at Adumbi South) and one man-portable rig (commencing at Kitenge Extension). Drilling was initially on a single-shift basis for approximately one week, and then changed to double shifts.

Drillhole collar coordinates were determined using Target software, and the sites were pegged in the field using a handheld GPS (± 5 m accuracy).

The holes were planned to be drilled to an average downhole depth of 140 m (maximum of 167 m) and are inclined at −50°. All cores were orientated to facilitate structural interpretation, and half-core sampling was done based on geological features with a maximum sample length of 1 m. Samples were submitted for fire assay to SGS Mwanza, with whom a new contract was negotiated in August 2016.


Figure 10.1: Location of Drill Targets on the Imbo Project (Adumbi South, Adumbi West and Kitenge Extension)

10.2.1.1 Adumbi South Target

The planned programme comprised 20 drillholes totalling 3,085 m, on 7 traverses at a spacing of 160 m along strike. The target lies 480 m to the south the Adumbi deposit and is defined by a 1.4 km long magnetic anomaly that appears to be demagnetised in places, and a > 200 ppb gold-in-soil anomaly. This target had similar geomorphological features to those of Adumbi West in that it occurs in a topographical low and is variably covered by transported soil with little to no lithological exposure. The nature of the gold-in-soil anomaly and the associated magnetic feature at Adumbi South was very similar to that associated with the Canal zone, which is thought to be the southeastern extension of the Adumbi mineralisation.

10.2.1.2 Adumbi West Target

The programme comprised 26 drillholes totalling 3,367 m, on 10 traverses at a spacing of 160 m along strike. This target lies to the west of the Adumbi deposit and is believed to be the faulted extension of Adumbi. It occurs in a topographical low, and for the most part is covered by transported material varying in depth from 30 cm to > 3 m. The target is defined by a 1.7 km long linear magnetic anomaly and a coincident and linear gold-in-soil anomaly with values of 50 ppb to 1,000 ppb. This magnetic feature is like that which defines the BIF at the Adumbi deposit.


10.2.1.3 Kitenge Extension Target

The programme comprised 17 drillholes totalling 2,435 m, on 7 traverses at a spacing of 320 m along strike. The target lies to the northwest of the Kitenge deposit and is defined by an approximately 2 km long magnetic feature with a coincident gold-in-soil anomaly with values from 50 ppb to 450 ppb. The magnetic feature has similar characteristics to that at the Canal and Adumbi South targets.

10.2.2 Drilling

The standard procedure required drill rig personnel to place the recovered drill core into metal core trays labelled at the drill site with the drillhole number. End-of-run markers were placed in the core tray between the end and start of each recovered drill run. Information on core recovery, depth of the run, stickup length, and ground conditions were recorded for each run and inspected by the rig geologists. The core was transported from the drill site by vehicle or helicopter to the core yard facility at the Adumbi base camp.

Prior to logging and sampling, the drill core was digitally photographed in order to maintain a permanent record. All the drill core photographs were downloaded into the project database, retained in company computers on site and at the corporate office in Toronto, Canada.

A total of 5,132 m from 34 holes were drilled.

10.2.3 Core Logging

Logging procedures included an initial visual assessment of the core with zones of good and poor mineralisation noted. This was then followed by geological logging of the lithology, alteration, structure, oxidation, mineralisation, general rock description, and magnetic susceptibility. The rock description recorded colour and approximate mineral assemblage. The drill data was summarised in cross section and also displayed in Strater log software.

10.2.4 Sampling and Assaying

One-metre sample lengths (adjusted for lithology) were marked on the core in the mineralised horizons during logging. The sample depths for each sample were entered into a sample ticket book, which contained removable duplicate sample ticket tags. The core sample numbers and sample intervals were written onto pre-printed diamond drill log forms. Each marked sample was split along its length by trained staff using a dedicated drill core diamond saw. The core was broken at the sample position marks using a geological pick. The sampling lengths were reduced, when necessary (e.g. where lithological contacts or core size changes were encountered), with the bottom/top end of the sample being approximately 2 cm from the contact. One half of the core was replaced in the core tray, and the remaining half was placed in a plastic sample bag, in which the sample number was folded in along the open end of the bag, which was then closed using a stapler. Sample tags were placed in the core tray at the position of the bottom end where samples had been obtained. A brick was sawn ("brick cleaning") after each sample had been split to ensure that no cross-contamination took place between samples.

All the core samples were sent to the SGS Laboratory in Mwanza for assaying. The core samples were then crushed down to −2 mm and split with one half of the sample pulverised down to 90 % passing 75 µm. Gold analyses were carried out on 50 g aliquots by fire assay. In addition, checks assays were also carried out by the screen fire assay method to verify high-grade sample assays obtained by fire assay. Internationally recognised standards and blanks were inserted as part of Loncor's internal QA/QC analytical procedures.


10.2.5 Core Re-Logging of All Core

Per RPA's recommendations in 2014, re-logging of all the core by Loncor in Q1 2020 identified major differences between the depths of the base of complete oxidation (BOCO) and the top of fresh rock (TOFR) and the depths used by RPA in the 2014 model. In the RPA model, the BOCO was negligible and the TOFR corresponded approximately to the re-logged BOCO. The deeper levels of oxidation that were observed during the re-logging exercise has had positive implications for the Adumbi project with respect to ore type classification and associated metallurgical recoveries and mining and processing cost estimates.

The re-logging exercise defined the presence of five distinct geological domains in the central part of the Adumbi deposit where the BIF unit attains a thickness of up to 130 m. From northeast to southwest, these are as follows:

1. Hanging Wall Schists: dominantly quartz carbonate schist, with interbedded carbonaceous schist.

2. Upper BIF Sequence: an interbedded sequence of BIF and chlorite schist, 45 m to 130 m in thickness.

3. Carbonaceous Marker: a distinctive 3 m to 17 m thick unit of black carbonaceous schist with pale argillaceous bands.

4. Lower BIF Sequence: BIF interbedded with quartz carbonate, carbonaceous and/or chlorite schist in a zone 4 m to 30 m wide.

5. Footwall Schists: similar to the hanging wall schist sequence.

In the central part of Adumbi, three main zones of gold mineralisation are present (see Figure 10.2):

  • Within the Lower BIF Sequence
  • In the lower part of the Upper BIF Sequence (Zones 1 and 2 are separated by the Carbonaceous Marker, which is essentially unmineralised)
  • A weaker zone in the upper part of the Upper BIF Sequence

Figure 10.2: Plan of the Interpreted Mineralised Zones

10.2.6 Analytical Results

Sample results for the drilling at Adumbi South, Adumbi West and Kitenge Extension demonstrate that the gold mineralisation was confined to narrow and/or low-grade zones. The most significant intersections from the programme were as follows:

  • Adumbi South:
  • 1.00 m at 3.85 g/t in ASDD003
  • Adumbi West:
  • 1.45 m at 8.53 g/t in AWDD002
  • Kitenge Extension:
  • 2.90 m at 1.05 g/t in SKDD0060
  • 1.60 m at 10.52 g/t in SKDD0063
  • 1.00 m at 3.08 g/t in SKDD0065
  • 7.36 m at 1.31 g/t in SKDD0070
  • 0.80 m at 23.90 g/t in SKDD0065

The results indicated little economic potential at Adumbi South, Adumbi West or Kitenge Extension and hence no further drilling was planned.

RPA recommended additional drilling at Adumbi to test the down dip/plunge extent of the mineralisation. In 2017, four deeper core holes were drilled below the previously outlined RPA Inferred Resource over a strike length of 400 m and to a maximum depth of 450 m below surface. All four holes intersected significant gold mineralisation in terms of widths and grade and are summarised Table 10.5.

Table 10.5: Summary of Significant Drill Intercepts from the 2017 Adumbi Deep Hole Drilling

Borehole

From
(m)

To
(m)

Intercept Width
(m)

True Width
(m)

Grade
(g/t Au)

SADD0050

434.73

447.42

12.69

10.67

5.51

SADD0051

393.43

402.72

9.29

6.54

4.09

SADD0052

389.72

401.87

12.15

7.01

3.24

419.15

428.75

9.60

5.54

5.04

SADD0053

346.36

355.63

9.27

5.70

3.71

391.72

415.17

23.45

14.43

6.08

The above drilling results, which are shown on the longitudinal section (see Figure 10.3), indicate that the gold mineralisation is open along strike and at depth.

Figure 10.3: Longitudinal Section of Adumbi Showing the Down Dip/Plunge, Potential and Proposed Drillholes


10.3 2020 TO 2021 DRILLING

This section summarises the drilling activities completed on the Adumbi deposit during the Loncor 2020 to 2021 drilling programme.

Following Minecon's review of the Imbo Project, accompanied by an Independent NI 43-101 Technical Report dated April 17, 2020, a recommendation was made to drill 12 diamond core holes totalling 6,250 m at the Adumbi deposit (see Figure 10.3). This was aimed at outlining additional mineral resources to the reported 2.5 Moz at the Imbo Project (Inferred Mineral Resources of 30.65 Mt grading 2.54 g/t Au).

The drillholes were planned on the 220° azimuth with varying inclinations, and to a maximum depth of 710 m. These holes were subsequently reviewed and prioritised to establish a preferred sequence of drilling as shown in Table 10.6.

Table 10.6: Initial Planned Adumbi Diamond Drillholes with Sequence of Drilling

BHID

UTM-Easting

UTM-Northing

End of Hole
(EOH)
(m)

Planned
PQ
(m)

Planned
HQ
(m)

Planned
NQ
(m)

Sequence
of Drilling

ADDP001

595128

192925

350

100

200

50

5

ADDP002

595165

192971

470

100

200

170

8

ADDP003

595206

193028

600

100

200

300

7

ADDP004

595173

192790

360

100

200

60

1

ADDP005

595270

192910

600

100

200

300

3

ADDP006

595275

192715

350

100

200

50

2

ADDP007

595413

192888

670

100

200

370

4

ADDP008

595522

192765

600

100

200

300

10

ADDP009

595566

192819

710

100

200

410

9

ADDP010

595500

192483

350

100

200

50

6

ADDP011

595581

192580

540

100

200

240

12

ADDP012

595620

192632

650

100

200

350

11

TOTAL

 

 

6,250

1,200

2,400

2,650

 

The drilling contract was awarded to Orezone Drilling, following a tendering process. Orezone Drilling had previously drilled the four deep holes on the Adumbi deposit in 2017.

Drilling commenced in October 2020 with a Sandvik DE 710 rig (see Figure 10.4), initially drilling a 12 h day shift and later switched to a 12 h double shift. A second rig, an Atlas Copco CS14, was mobilised to site and commenced drilling on November 10, 2020, on the double shift (see Figure 10.5).


Figure 10.4: Sandvik DE 710 Rig, Drilling LADD001

Figure 10.5: Atlas Copco CS 14 Rig, Drilling LADD004

10.3.1 Drillhole Nomenclature

A new drillhole nomenclature (LADD00X) was adopted as part of this drilling campaign. Thus, the Borehole ID LADD00X refers to Loncor Adumbi Diamond Drillhole 00X, where 00X is the hole number.

10.3.2 Downhole Survey

The downhole survey was initially done with Reflex EZ Trac equipment at every 30 m, and reports were submitted to the rig geologist at the end of every survey. These were plotted progressively to determine any hole deflections and their possible impact on the objectives of the drilling programme. However, following a few discrepancies that were noticed in the survey readings, a recommendation was made to replace the Reflex EZ Trac survey equipment with a Gyro unit to avoid any possible effects of the magnetic properties of the BIF unit on the readings. Subsequently, a Sprint-IQ gyro was used for the subsequent drillholes.


10.3.3 Core Orientation and Structural measurements

Reflex Act ll orientation survey equipment was used for core orientation at every run of 3 m in competent material to aid in structural measurements. The surveys were verified by the rig geologist at the end of each run and marked as either reliable or unreliable.

Structural measurements taken during the routine logging were from bedding, foliation, and quartz veins (see Figure 10.6, Figure 10.7 and Figure 10.8) whereas structural measurements from the lithological contacts, joints and shears have been captured in detail under a separate geotechnical logging programme.

Figure 10.6: Bedding in BIF Unit of LADD001, from 153.20 m to 153.45 m

Figure 10.7: Foliation in QCS Unit of LADD003, from 100.80 m to 101.02 m

Figure 10.8: Quartz Veining in QCS Unit of LADD001, from 340.67 m to 340.87 m


All the structural measurements were taken using a kenometer, which measures alpha (α) and beta (β) angles using the bottom of hole line (BOHL as reference (see Figure 10.9).

Figure 10.9: Use of a Kenometer to Measure Alpha (α) and Beta (β) Angles of an Oriented Core

These readings were then converted to the "strike/dip right" convention using the Dips Software. The converted combined structural measurements for LADD001, LADD003, LADD004, LADD006, LADD007, LADD008, LADD009, LADD012, LADD013, LADD014, LADD015, LADD016, LADD017, LCDD001, LADD018, LADD019, LADD020, LADD021, LADD022, LADD023, LADD024, LADD025 and LADD026 were plotted on a stereographic net to aid in interpretation. The structural interpretation for the above completed drillholes is presented in Section 7.5.

10.3.4 Rig Monitoring, Core Recovery and RQD Measurements

The rig geologist monitors the daily drilling activities to ensure that the quality of the core is not compromised. Once the core is placed on the angle iron by the driller, the geologist checks the orientation survey and marks the appropriate BOHL on the core, indicating whether the survey is reliable, unreliable or no survey at all. A solid black line is used to mark a reliable survey, a broken line to indicate an unreliable survey, and a dotted line to indicate where no survey was conducted. All these lines are marked with an arrow pointing to the downhole of the core. The BOHL is marked with a black permanent marker. After transferring the core from the angle iron into the appropriately labelled core tray (either PQ, HQ or NQ), the driller's metres are indicated with yellow labelled plastic blocks (see Figure 10.10). Any core losses are recorded, and the location marked with a labelled wooden block. The percentage core recovery is measured as well as the rock quality designation (RQD). Quick lithological logging is done at the rig site and any alterations/mineralisation recorded. All the core recovered during the shift, except for the last half-filled box, is transported to the camp core shed during the day.


Figure 10.10: Core Tray showing BOHL, Metre Marks and Driller's Metre Blocks

10.3.5 Drillhole Collar Survey

All completed drillholes were surveyed using the global navigation satellite system (GNSS) Trimble R10. The survey data was derived from reference control points (see Table 10.7) located within the Adumbi base camp (established since 2014) as survey control points with UTM (Zone 35 North) based on the Datum WGS 84 coordinate system (see Figure 10.11).

Table 10.7: Adumbi Deposit Survey Control Coordinate Points in UTM

Point ID

Easting

Northing

Elevation

Code

14MRSCM

596523.35

191570.88

649.6

10IPIC

14SCM1

596620.47

191457.32

644.39

10IPIC

14SCM2

596669.84

191500.62

646.41

10IPIC

Figure 10.11: Trimble R10 GNSS Survey Control Points and Rover Receiver Surveying Drillhole Collar


Figure 10.12 presents the planned and completed drillholes and access roads for the 2020 to 2021 drilling programme.

Figure 10.12: Adumbi Planned and Completed Drillholes with Access Roads


The 24 completed holes (totalling 10,071.44 m) drilled at Adumbi during 2020 to 2021 and covered by this report are detailed in Table 10.8.

Table 10.8: Drill Collars of Adumbi Completed Boreholes

BHID

Prospect

Easting
(m)

Northing
(m)

RL
(m)

Azimuth
(°)

Inclination
(°)

End Depth (m)

LADD001

Adumbi

595172

192791

685.20

220

−65

360.30

LADD003

Adumbi

595273

192712

704.97

220

−57

309.20

LADD004

Adumbi

595271

192911

660.28

220

−70

566.30

LADD006

Adumbi

595127

192924

678.64

218

−58

395.35

LADD007

Adumbi

595413

192882

680.21

218

−68

647.75

LADD008

Adumbi

595496

192483

689.75

218

−65

365.35

LADD009

Adumbi

595306

192945

667.60

218

−75

689.30

LADD012

Adumbi

595565

192814

714.58

217

−75

948.30

LADD013

Adumbi

595160

192971

667.25

218

−72

485.80

LADD014

Adumbi

595523

192764

718.22

217

−72

772.93

LADD015

Adumbi

595112

192722

717.83

220

−49

168.50

LADD016

Adumbi

595232

193063

659.07

217

−75

867.95

LADD017

Adumbi

595158

192699

716.96

219

−46

147.40

LCDD001

Canal

595539

192065

640.44

40

−51

196.10

LCDD002

Canal

595796

191955

656.61

220

−50

163.50

LADD018

Adumbi

595186

192735

710.00

219

−45

204.66

LADD019

Adumbi

595476

192350

711.86

221.7

−50

151.40

LADD020

Adumbi

595422

192770

698.94

221

−45

433.80

LADD021

Adumbi

595413

192499

728.00

219.28

−49

219.10

LADD022

Adumbi

595378

192429

748.00

220

−56

149.50

LADD023

Adumbi

595256

192808

677.00

221

−50

377.55

LADD024

Adumbi

595574

192452

670.75

222

−49

352.80

LADD025

Adumbi

595499

192606

690.50

219

−48

393.60

LADD026

Adumbi

595206

193028

658.00

217

−72

705.00

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,071.44

10.3.6 Core Logging

Upon receipt of the core at the camp core shed, the senior geologist proceeds with systematic core logging (see Figure 10.13). The logging procedures include an initial visual assessment of the core with zones of good and poor mineralisation noted. This is then followed by geological logging with separate log sheets capturing lithology, alteration, structure, geotechnical, oxidation, mineralisation, general rock description and magnetic susceptibility. The rock description records colour and approximate mineral assemblage. The drill data is then summarised in cross section and displayed in Strater log software. A typical Strater log for LADD023 is displayed in Figure 10.14 to Figure 10.20.

The BOCO and the TOFR for each drillhole are measured and recorded. Those for LADD001 were measured at 59.70 m (BOCO) and 71.03 m (TOFR).


Figure 10.13: Senior Geologists Logging Core from LADD001


Figure 10.14: Strater Log for LADD023 - Page 1


Figure 10.15: Strater Log for LADD023 - Page 2


Figure 10.16: Strater Log for LADD023 - Page 3


Figure 10.17: Strater Log for LADD023 - Page 4


Figure 10.18: Strater Log for LADD023 - Page 5


Figure 10.19: Strater Log for LADD023 - Page 6


Figure 10.20: Strater Log for LADD023 - Page 7


A summary of the lithological units intercepted within the mineralised package and the composition of the alteration mineral assemblage of each drillhole is captured as presented in Table 10.9 for LADD025.

Table 10.9: Summary of the Lithological Units Intercepted within the Mineralised Package of LADD025 and Composition of the Alteration Mineral Assemblage

BHID

Lithology

Alteration and Mineralisation

Sampling

From
(m)

To
(m)

Code

From

To

No. of Samples

LADD025

146.35

158.65

CBS/QCS

Weakly pervasive silica, moderate irregular veins of quartz-carbonate, moderate patchy chlorite, weak patchy dolerite, 0.5 % disseminated pyrite, 0.25 % disseminated pyrrhotite

71364

71372

71370

71377

13

LADD025

158.65

171.00

QCS/CBS/BIF

Moderately pervasive silica, weak irregular veins of quartz-carbonate, weak patchy chlorite, 0.25 % disseminated pyrite, 0.25 % disseminated pyrrhotite

71379

71387

71394

71385

71392

14

LADD025

171.00

174.00

QCS

Moderately pervasive silica, weak patchy dolomite and chlorite

71395

71397

3

LADD025

174.00

177.9

QCS

Moderately pervasive silica, patchy chlorite, patchy ankerite, patchy dolomite, irregular veins of quartz, 0.5 % disseminated pyrite, 1 % disseminated pyrrhotite

71399

71520

71400

71521

4

LADD025

177.90

179.20

QCS

Moderately pervasive silica, strong irregular veins of quartz, weak patchy ankerite, 2.5 % disseminated pyrite

71523

71524

2

LADD025

179.20

180.80

QCS

Weakly pervasive silica, weak irregular veins of quartz-carbonate, weak patchy ankerite, 0.25 % disseminated pyrite

71525

71526

2

LADD025

180.80

190.52

QCS/CBS/BIF

Moderately pervasive silica, moderate irregular veins of quartz-carbonate, weak patchy chlorite, 1 % disseminated pyrite, 0.25 % disseminated pyrrhotite, traces of arsenopyrite

71527

71533

71531

71538

11

LADD025

201.55

205.17

QCS/CBS-AS

Moderate foliation parallel veins of quartz-carbonate, 1 % disseminated pyrite, 0.25 % disseminated pyrrhotite

71539

71541

71544

5




BHID

Lithology

Alteration and Mineralisation

Sampling

From
(m)

To
(m)

Code

From

To

No. of Samples

LADD025

211.52

215.75

QCS/BIF

Weakly pervasive silica, moderate irregular veins of quartz-carbonate, weak patchy ankerite and chlorite, 0.5 % disseminated pyrite, 0.25 % disseminated pyrrhotite

71545

71547

-

71550

5

LADD025

215.75

221.62

QCS/BIF

Weakly pervasive silica, weak irregular veins of quartz, moderate patchy chlorite, traces of pyrite and pyrrhotite

71551

71557

71555

-

6

LADD025

221.62

230.10

BIF/QCS

Moderately pervasive silica, moderate irregular veins of quartz-carbonate, weak patchy chlorite, 1 % disseminated pyrite, 1 % disseminated pyrrhotite, 0.25 % disseminated arsenopyrite

71558

71566

71564

71569

11

LADD025

230.10

236.42

IQCS/ BIF

Moderately pervasive silica, weak foliation parallel veins of quartz-carbonate, weak patchy chlorite

71570

71574

71572

71577

7

LADD025

236.42

252.30

BIF/QCS

Weakly pervasive silica, weak patchy dolomite, weak patchy chlorite, 0.75 % disseminated pyrite, 1 % disseminated pyrrhotite, traces of arsenopyrite

71578

71583

71593

71597

71581

71591

71595

71599

19

LADD025

252.30

254.05

IQCS

Weakly pervasive silica, moderate patchy dolomite, moderate patchy chlorite,

71600

71601

2

LADD025

254.05

263.50

QCS/BIF

Moderately pervasive silica, moderate irregular veins of quartz, weak patchy ankerite, dolomite and chlorite, 1.5 % disseminated pyrite, 2 % disseminated pyrrhotite, 0.5 % disseminated arsenopyrite

71603

71614

71612

71615

12

LADD025

263.50

266.00

RP

Strongly pervasive silica, weak patchy dolomite, weak patchy chlorite, 6 % disseminated pyrite, 4 % disseminated pyrrhotite, 3 % disseminated arsenopyrite

71617

71619

3

LADD025

266.00

277.57

QCS/CBS/BIF

Weakly pervasive silica, weak patchy dolomite, weak patchy chlorite, 0.25 % disseminated pyrite, 0.5 % disseminated pyrrhotite

71620

71630

71628

71634

14

LADD025

277.57

279.50

IQCS

Moderately pervasive silica, weak patchy dolomite, weak patchy chlorite, 0.5 % disseminated pyrite, 0.5 % disseminated pyrrhotite

71635

71636

2




BHID

Lithology

Alteration and Mineralisation

Sampling

From
(m)

To
(m)

Code

From

To

No. of Samples

LADD025

279.50

284.50

IQCS/CBS-AS/QCS

Moderately pervasive silica, weak patchy dolomite, weak patchy chlorite, weak irregular veins of quartz, 2 % disseminated pyrite, 1.25 % disseminated pyrrhotite,

71638

71643

6

LADD025

284.50

286.35

RP

Strongly pervasive silica, 3 % disseminated pyrite, 4 % disseminated pyrrhotite, 3 % disseminated arsenopyrite

71644

71646

 

2

LADD025

286.35

299.40

QCS/CBS/BIF

Moderately pervasive silica, weak patchy carbonate, weak patchy chlorite, weak irregular veins of quartz, 0.75 % disseminated pyrite, 1 % disseminated pyrrhotite

71647

71657

71665

71655

71663

 

17

LADD025

299.40

304.85

QCS/BIF/RP

Moderately pervasive silica, weak patchy carbonate, weak patchy chlorite, weak irregular veins of quartz, 2 % disseminated pyrite, 2 % disseminated pyrrhotite, 1.5 % disseminated arsenopyrite

71666

71672

71670

71673

7

LADD025

304.85

305.95

RP

Strongly pervasive silica, 5 % disseminated pyrite, 10 % disseminated pyrrhotite, 5 % disseminated arsenopyrite

71674

 

1

LADD025

305.95

310.95

QCS

Strongly pervasive silica, weak patchy carbonate, weak patchy chlorite, weak irregular veins of quartz, 1.5 % disseminated pyrite, 3 % disseminated pyrrhotite, 1 % disseminated arsenopyrite

71675

71680

71678

71681

6

LADD025

310.95

321.60

QCS/CBS-AS

Weak irregular veins of quartz-carbonate, weak patchy carbonate and dolomite, weak patchy chlorite, 1 % disseminated pyrite, 1 % disseminated pyrrhotite

71682

71690

71688

71693

11

LADD025

321.60

325.00

CBS-AS/RP

Strongly pervasive silica, 7 % disseminated pyrite, 4 % disseminated pyrrhotite, 5 % disseminated arsenopyrite

71695

71698

4

LADD025

325.00

333.95

QCS/CBS/BIF

Moderately pervasive silica, weak patchy dolomite, weak patchy chlorite, 1 % disseminated pyrite, 2.5 % disseminated pyrrhotite, 5 % disseminated arsenopyrite

71699

71703

71710

71701

71708

 

10

LADD025

333.95

336.20

RP

Strongly pervasive silica, weak patchy chlorite, 5 % disseminated pyrite, 10 % disseminated pyrrhotite, 2 % disseminated arsenopyrite

71711

71713

3




BHID

Lithology

Alteration and Mineralisation

Sampling

From
(m)

To
(m)

Code

From

To

No. of Samples

LADD025

336.20

342.65

CBS-AS/ICQS

Weakly pervasive silica, weak patchy dolomite, weak patchy chlorite, weak foliation parallel veins of quartz-carbonate, 1 % disseminated pyrite, 1.5 % disseminated pyrrhotite, 0.25 % disseminated arsenopyrite

71714

71720

71718

71722

8

LADD025

342.65

345.10

BIF/RP

Strongly pervasive silica, 2 % disseminated pyrite, 3.5 % disseminated pyrrhotite, 1.5 % disseminated arsenopyrite

71723

71725

3

LADD025

345.10

348.20

QCS/CBS

Weakly pervasive silica, weak patchy chlorite, weak foliation parallel veins of quartz, 0.25 % disseminated pyrite, 0.25 % disseminated pyrrhotite

71726

71729

4

LADD025

348.20

351.18

RP

Strongly pervasive silica, weak patchy dolomite, 7.5 % disseminated pyrite, 7.5 % disseminated pyrrhotite, 3.5 % disseminated arsenopyrite

71731

71734

71732

 

3

LADD025

351.18

355.20

BIF

Moderately pervasive silica, weak patchy chlorite, weak patchy dolomite, 3.5 % disseminated pyrite, 1.5 % disseminated pyrrhotite, 2 % disseminated arsenopyrite

71735

71739

5

LADD025

355.20

356.70

BIF

Weakly pervasive silica, 0.25 % disseminated pyrite, 0.5 % disseminated pyrrhotite

71740

71741

2

LADD025

356.70

359.90

QCS/BIF

Strongly pervasive silica, 3 % disseminated pyrite, 3 % disseminated pyrrhotite, 2 % disseminated arsenopyrite

71742

71745

4

LADD025

359.90

361.75

ICQS

Moderately pervasive silica, weak patchy chlorite, weak patchy dolomite, 0.25 % disseminated pyrite, 1 % disseminated pyrrhotite

71746

71748

 

2

LADD025

361.75

367.00

QCS/CBS

Weakly pervasive silica, weak irregular veins of quartz, weak patchy carbonate

71749

71754

6

Lithological units intersected in the completed 2020 to 2021 drillholes are mainly quartz carbonate schist (QCS) intercalated carbonaceous schist (CBS), banded iron formation (BIF) with or without QCS intercalations, and the RP zone. Sulphide mineralisation comprising pyrite, pyrrhotite and arsenopyrite in varying proportions within the mineralised zones is the main alteration mineral assemblage. Strong silicification and seldom weak chlorite are present. Massive dolerite was intersected in the footwall of the mineralisation in Drillhole LADD012.


Further descriptions of the individual rock types intersected in these drillholes are given below.

10.3.6.1 Quartz-Carbonate Schist (QCS)

Fine- to medium-grained, pale grey to pale greenish grey schist, comprising subrounded, dark grey quartz grains up to 1.5 mm (probably remnant clastic grains) in a finer-grained matrix of quartz, white mica, and carbonate (ankerite). The carbonate forms irregular, elongated grains orientated parallel to the foliation. It is the most abundant rock in the Adumbi sequence (see Figure 10.21).

It is interpreted that the rock was probably originally a poorly sorted, calcareous, muddy, fine- grained arenite, possibly a greywacke.

Figure 10.21: Quartz-Carbonate Schist, LADD014, 153.75 m to 154.00 m

10.3.6.2 Carbonaceous Schist (CBS)

Very fine-grained, dark grey to black schist, consisting of carbonaceous material and (according to petrographic data) varying amounts of white mica (see Figure 10.22). Quartz is rare. Banding due to variations in the proportion of white mica reflects the bedding in the original sediment. The nature of the carbonaceous material was not determined petrographically but based on samples of similar material from elsewhere in the Ngayu belt. It is probably amorphous carbon rather than graphite.

The rock was probably originally a black shale formed in a deep marine environment.


Figure 10.22: Carbonaceous Schist, LADD012, 767.07 m to 767.27 m

10.3.6.3 Banded Iron Formation (BIF)

The BIF consists of black, fine-grained magnetite-rich bands alternating with white to pale buff chert. The width of the magnetite bands is variable, ranging from laminae only a few millimetres wide, to bands up to approximately 10 cm across (see Figure 10.23).

Figure 10.23: Banded Iron Formation, LADD013, 378.67 m to 378.87 m

10.3.6.4 Dolerite

Mafic intrusive rock, massive (not deformed), dark greenish in colour, medium-grained with localised irregular veins and veinlets of quartz-carbonate, intersected in the footwall of the mineralisation in Drillhole LADD012 (see Figure 10.24).

Figure 10.24: Dolerite, LADD012, from 939.20 m to 939.31 m


10.3.6.5 Replaced Rock (RP)

The RP zone is believed to have resulted from a highly intense hydrothermal alteration. As observed in other drillholes at Adumbi, the main hydrothermally altered zones are associated with the BIF. The alteration assemblages vary in style and intensity, progressing from the distal to the proximal. These have been intercepted in Drillhole LADD013 as shown in Figure 10.25, Figure 10.26 and Figure 10.27. The three stages of hydrothermal alteration in the BIF unit in increasing order of intensity are described below.

Stage 1

Carbonate (ankerite) replaces the magnetite bands in the BIF. The bands assume a pale brownish orange colour and become weakly to non-magnetic (see Figure 10.25).

Figure 10.25: Distal Alteration: Ankerite Replacement of Magnetite, LADD013, 430.97 m to 431.12 m

Stage 2

Pyrite ± pyrrhotite ± arsenopyrite aggregates largely replace the magnetite bands, together with quartz ± ankerite (see Figure 10.26). The proportions of the sulphides vary significantly, often over short distances of a few centimetres; pyrite is usually present but may be subordinate to any pyrrhotite and arsenopyrite present. The chert bands appear to have undergone some recrystallisation and show patchy ankerite alteration; sulphides may be present locally although in much smaller amounts than in the replaced magnetite bands. The original banding of the BIF can still be discerned.

Figure 10.26: Magnetite Bands Totally Replaced by Sulphides and Quartz, LADD013, 426.18 m to 426.33 m


Stage 3

Total recrystallisation and replacement of the BIF form an assemblage of sulphides and quartz (see Figure 10.27). Banding in the BIF is destroyed, and the original rock is unrecognisable. The proportion of sulphide varies, but averages approximately 26 %. The sulphide species are pyrite, pyrrhotite and arsenopyrite, although the ratios vary significantly. This proximal assemblage is logged separately as the RP Zone, and it is generally associated with higher gold grades.

Figure 10.27: Proximal Alteration resulting in Complete Recrystallisation and Replacement of the BIF, LADD013, 425.07 m to 425.23 m

Figure 10.28 is a surface geological map showing traces of the cross-section lines through Drillholes LADD009 (AıA), LADD012 (BıB) and LADD025 CıC).

Figure 10.28: Adumbi Surface Geology Showing Section Lines through LADD009, LADD012 and LADD025


Typical drillhole cross sections through LAD009, LADD012 and LADD025 are shown in Figure 10.29, Figure 10.30 and Figure 10.31, respectively.

Figure 10.29: Cross Section through Drillhole LADD009


Figure 10.30: Cross Section through Drillhole LADD012


Figure 10.31: Cross Section through Drillhole LADD025

10.3.7 Core Photography

After logging, the core is photographed before cutting and sampling. An improvised fixed environment (see Figure 10.32) has been fabricated to facilitate core photography. This comprises a wooden box (1.2 m high) designed with the length and width being a few centimetres longer and wider than the size of the core tray, painted all white inside and fitted with fluorescent lights to the roof. A small hole (the size of the lens of a digital camera) is created at the top of the box and fitted with a digital camera at 1 m height from the base where the core tray slots in.

Prior to photographing, the entire core is made wet to enhance the picture quality. Once the core tray is slotted into the box, the door is closed and the light switched on. The pre-set digital camera is switched on from the top and the photograph taken. This is done so that all the core photographs are taken under the same conditions and from a fixed height to enhance standard quality and merging for future digital logging.


Figure 10.32: Improvised Fixed Environment for Core Photography

Each photograph covers one box of core, and the core is oriented in such a way that the metre marks and the BOHL are displayed.

Each photograph is saved on computer using the borehole number, tray, and from-to depths as the file name, e.g., LADD001-20-72-77 m.

10.3.8 Geotechnical Logging

Following Minecon's recommendation, geotechnical logging of the current drill core was undertaken by a dedicated senior geotechnical geologist. It is worth stating that all previous oriented core, including the four deep holes of 2017, was not logged geotechnically. However, it is appropriate to carry out geotechnical logging on the core before it is cut and sampled as such information is crucial for the current study and future feasibility studies, in particular, when it comes to the determination of pit slopes and other engineering studies.

The geotechnical logging was carried out according to the system employed by Steffen Robertson and Kirsten (SRK) UK. The data is stored on an MS Access database designed by SRK, which enables calculations such as rock mass rating (RMR) to be easily made. All the completed 2020 to 2021 drillholes were geotechnically logged.

Table 10.10 and Table 10.11 summarise the geotechnical information captured from LADD001.


Table 10.10: Summary of Geotechnical Log of Drillhole LADD001 along Depth

BHID

From (m)

To (m)

Description by Crossing Depth

LADD001

0.00

1.00

Very moist, moderate brown soft intact, fine-grained hill wash material; transported

LADD001

1.00

25.90

Slightly moist, light grey, firm dense, fine- to medium-grained showing texture of bed rock, but highly weathered and completely oxidised with soil properties

LADD001

25.90

59.67

Light to dark grey, fine-grained units, moderately weathered, highly discoloured, medium-hard rock units with hardness of approximately 50 MPa and moderately fractured

LADD001

59.67

69.55

Dark grey units, fine-grained, slightly weathered and fractured, but showing difference from the fresh rock strength with hardness of approximately 100 MPa

LADD001

69.55

360.30

Unweathered intact rock units, very slightly fractured, no sign of staining, hard rock units generally above 150 MPa

Table 10.11: Hardness of Lithological Units

Code

Unit

Hardness Description of major Lithological Unit

QCS

Quartz Carbonate Schist

Strong and hard unit in original condition, estimated hardness approximately 200 MPa

BIF

Banded Iron Formation

Very strong when it is silicified and less fractured, hardness approximately 150 MPa

CBS

Carbonaceous Schist

Not very hard unless it has undergone strong silicification, which is usually observed in the area (hardness above 100 MPa) on fresh unit

QV

Quartz Vein

Strong small unit rarely banded with other units, hardness above 200 MPa when it is not fractured

CS

Chlorite Schist

The unit is strong when silicified, estimated hardness approximately 150 MPa

IQCS

Intercalation QCS and CBS

The unit is bedded with intercalation of two units (QCS and CBS), also hard when silicified, hardness approximately 200 MPa

RP

Replaced Rock

Hard unit and commonly highly silicified, estimated hardness above 200 MPa when not fractured

The rock units are slightly fractured (jointed), and most of the joints are cemented in the fresh zones, which makes the RMR value higher in unweathered zones.

The values of the hardness presented in Table 10.11 are based on field estimations by using a penknife, carbide scribe pen, and a geological hammer. Therefore, a uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) test will be useful for the standardisation of hardness of the rock units. As the geotechnical logging progresses, representative samples will be collected and recommended for the UCS test.

Table 10.12 is the automatically generated summary of the RMR report for LADD001. It is worth noting that the mining rock mass rating (MRMR) system and the mining adjustments highlighted in the table are the parameters applied in mining and depend on complex adjustments that cannot be defined based on only core logging.


Table 10.12: RMR Report for LADD001

Lithology

Development MRMR

Downhole

Mining Adjustments

Weathering

Min.

Average

Max.

Min.

Average

Max.

m

Downhole
(m)

Weathering
(%)

Orientation
(%)

Stress
(%)

Blasting
(%)

Water
(%)

Adjustment
(%)

Banded Iron Formation

UW

52

67

100

0

0

0

58.67

16.0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Carbonaceous Schist

MW

23

29

37

0

0

0

22.25

6.1

0

0

0

0

0

0

Carbonaceous Schist

SW

30

32

39

0

0

0

3.23

0.9

0

0

0

0

0

0

Carbonaceous Schist

UW

39

59

100

0

0

0

25.14

6.9

0

0

0

0

0

0

Chlorite Schist

UW

60

60

60

0

0

0

1.71

0.5

0

0

0

0

0

0

Interbedded QCS and CBS

MW

30

33

43

0

0

0

4.90

1.3

0

0

0

0

0

0

Interbedded QCS and CBS

SW

30

32

33

0

0

0

4.50

1.2

0

0

0

0

0

0

Interbedded QCS and CBS

UW

37

55

70

0

0

0

41.80

11.4

0

0

0

0

0

0

Quartz Carbonate Schist

MW

27

32

37

0

0

0

7.93

2.2

0

0

0

0

0

0

Quartz Carbonate Schist

SW

27

27

27

0

0

0

2.15

0.6

0

0

0

0

0

0

Quartz Carbonate Schist

UW

40

63

100

0

0

0

149.99

40.9

0

0

0

0

0

0

Quartz Vein

UW

96

99

100

0

0

0

2.88

0.8

0

0

0

0

0

0

Replaced Rock

UW

56

71

100

0

0

0

17.02

4.6

0

0

0

0

0

0

MW Moderately Weathered
SW Strongly Weathered
UW Unweathered



10.3.9 Core Cutting and Sampling

After logging, the geologist marks a line with a chinagraph pencil approximately 3 mm to the left of the BOHL in the downhole direction along which core cutting is done (see Figure 10.33). One-metre sample lengths (adjusted for lithology) are marked on the core in the mineralised horizons during logging. In homogeneous rock, the maximum sample interval is 1 m. The minimum sample interval is 0.3 m. The sample depths for each sample are entered into a sample ticket book, which contains removable duplicate sample ticket tags. The core sample numbers and sample intervals are written onto pre-printed diamond drill log forms. Each marked sample is split along its length by trained staff using a dedicated drill core diamond saw (see Figure 10.34). The core is broken at the sample position marks using a geological pick. The sampling lengths are reduced, when necessary (e.g. where lithological contacts or core size changes are encountered), with the bottom/top end of the sample being approximately 2 cm from the contact.

Figure 10.33: Marked Line in Red along which Core cutting is Done

Figure 10.34: Adumbi Mining Staff cutting Core from LADD001


One half of the core is replaced in the core tray, and the remaining half is placed in a plastic sample bag, in which the sample number is folded in along the open end of the bag, which is then closed using a stapler (see Figure 10.35). Sample tags are placed in the core tray at the position of the bottom end where the sample is obtained. A brick is sawn ("brick cleaning") after each sample has been split to ensure that no cross-contamination takes place between samples.

Figure 10.35: Senior Geologist Sampling Core from LADD001

All the core samples collected are sent to the on-site sample preparation laboratory for pre-assay, after which 150 g of the pulverised material are placed in sample packets and shipped to the SGS Laboratory in Mwanza for wet chemistry assaying.

10.4 2020 TO 2021 DRILLING - MAMBO BADO

Mambo Bado 1 is located approximately at 1.5 km NW of the Adumbi deposit. Rock chip/channel samples collected from quartz veins and sheared metasediments returned very encouraging results as displayed in the surface map in Figure 10.36.


Figure 10.36: Mambo Bado Plan Map showing Location of Planned Drillholes, Channel and Bedrock Workings

A preliminary interpretation based on the surface information seemed to point to a series of parallel NW-SE mineralised zones with variable widths. It was envisaged that drilling to test these mineralised trends would aid in understanding the subsurface geology as well as ascertain the mineralisation potential of this prospect area.

Based on the above encouraging results and the surface structural interpretation, a shallow diamond drilling programme on four sections was proposed to test the subsurface mineralisation (see Table 10.13).


Table 10.13: Mambo Bado Planned Drillholes

Section

BHID

Easting

Northing

Azimuth
(°)

Inclination
(°)

Vertical
Distance (m)
to

Mineralisation

EOH
(m)

Targeted Mineralisation

Comments

Section 1

MDDP001

594463

193740

220

−55

55

130

8.40 m at 2.06 g/t in IWCH006

Open ended to both sides (NE and SW) along the main artisanal workings

1.00 m at 1.00 g/t in ADWC010

Projected along the main artisanal workings

MDDP003

594570

193869

220

−55

58

110

3.50 m at 0.96 g/t, including 2.20 m at 1.46 g/t in ADWC017

Open to the NE

3.00 m at 1.78 g/t, including 2.00 m at 2.61 g/t in AWC018

Open to the SW

Section 2

MDDP004

594367

193785

220

−55

58

130

6.00 m at 3.62 g/t, including 1.00 m at 9.10 g/t in ADWC012

Open ended to both sides (NE and SW). Localised at 100 m NW of Section 1

Section 3

MDDP002

594296

193836

220

−55

60

95

1.80 m at 3.57 g/t in ADWC008

Open to the SW. Localised at 90 m NW of Section 2

Soil anomaly up to 216 ppb

 

MDDP005

594215

193761

220

−55

79

115

6.00 m at 1.98 g/t, including 2.00 m at 3.5 g/t and 2.00 m at 2.32 g/t in ADWC002

Open to both sides (NE and SW)

Rock chips grading 6.96 g/t and 4.46 g/t

 

Soil anomaly up to 103 ppb

 

Section 4

MDDP006

594109

193805

220

−55

62

100

3.40 m at 2.11 g/t in ADWC005

Open to both sides (NE and SW)

4.60 m at 4.05 g/t, including 1.60 m at 9.24 g/t and 0.70 m at 5.20 g/t in ADWC001

 

Rock chips grading 69.5 g/t, 24.70 g/t and 4.82 g/t

 

Soil anomaly up to 124 ppb

 



Drilling was planned to initially test two sections (± 200 m apart on the NE-SW trend) by drilling holes MDDP001 and MDDP002. An orientation survey was planned to be conducted on competent cores to aid in the structural interpretation of the subsurface geology.

While the drilling contractor Orezone Drilling was awaiting additional HQ rods to continue drilling the deeper core holes at Adumbi, the Atlas Copco rig (CS14 Rig 2) was moved to drill the first two shallow holes at Mambo Bado. Table 10.14 presents the collars of the completed drillholes.

Two main lithological units were intersected: a greenish metavolcanic rock (possibly basalt), and metasedimentary rock (QCS). The holes started in a reddish, fine-grained, massive to weakly foliated undifferentiated saprolite (possibly after metavolcanic rock), containing weak irregular veinlets and veins of quartz, weakly patchy limonite-silica, and 0.25 % boxworks. Artisanal miners are busy exploiting the quartz veinlets within this saprolite.

Table 10.14: Drill Collars of Mambo Bado Completed Boreholes

BHID

Prospect

Easting
(m)

Northing
(m)

RL
(m)

Azimuth
(°)

Inclination
(°)

End Depth
(m)

LBDD001

Mambo Bado

594463

193740

671

220

−55

218.7 0

LBDD002

Mambo Bado

594296

193836

678

220

−55

143.50

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

362.20

Assay results from drillholes LBDD001 and LBDD002 did not return encouraging results. The significant results from LBDD002 are presented in Table 10.15.

Table 10.15: Significant Mineralised Intercepts from Drillhole LBDD002

Borehole
Number

From
(m)

To
(m)

Intersected Width
(m)

Grade
(g/t Au)

LBDD002

23.70

24.70

1.00

4.10

LBDD002

111.90

113.90

2.00

1.61

Based on these initial drilling results, Mambo Bado has been downgraded, and no further drilling is planned.


11 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY

11.1 SAMPLE PREPARATION AND ANALYSES

The sample preparation and analyses for samples from 2010 to 2013, which were undertaken by the ALS Chemex laboratory, have been outlined in the RPA 2014 NI 43-101 Technical Report.

During the 2014 to 2017 exploration activity, sample preparation and analyses were outsourced to the SGS laboratory in Mwanza, Tanzania (which is independent of Loncor). The SGS laboratory operates a quality system that is accredited in accordance with ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and SANAS (South African National Accreditation System). The SGS laboratory acted as an umpire laboratory even while ALS Chemex was the principal laboratory; hence, correlational studies between the two laboratories have been undertaken.

For the 2020 to 2021 drilling programme carried out by Loncor, the ALS Chemex sample preparation facility on site was recommissioned by Minecon's laboratory technical team and used for sample preparation. A full description of the laboratory has been outlined in the RPA 2014 NI 43-101 Technical Report.

Minecon's laboratory management personnel have been on site to render training to Loncor's laboratory staff and provide management services to the laboratory facility, and have continued to manage the facility from the recommission date in October 2020 to date. The laboratory is running efficiently and according to standard guidelines. Laboratory procedures have been documented and reviewed by Minecon senior management, and internal quality control measures have been taken. Based on the documentation and discussions with the laboratory management, Minecon's senior management does not have any concerns regarding the sample preparation for all Loncor samples.

Sample pulps are sent for analyses to SGS Mwanza, which serves as the primary laboratory. SGS is internationally accredited and utilises conventional sample preparation, sample analysis and associated quality control protocols.

11.1.1 Sample Preparation Procedure

Following from the Minecon April 17, 2020, NI 43-101 Technical Report, Minecon made some recommendations. One such recommendation was that "The Company should consider re-using the on-site sample preparation laboratory, which has been lying idle for some years since it will help with enforcing stricter QA/QC policing on the analytical laboratory, standards and ordinary samples will be in the same matrix thus making it more difficult for an external laboratory to detect it. Issues of duplicates will be better handled with a sample preparation laboratory. Some concerns about shortage of samples for other important studies could as well be managed as both coarse and pulp rejects in addition to the half or quarter cores will be available for use."

In managing the 2020 to 2021 exploration programme, Loncor agreed to recommission the on-site sample preparation laboratory. A full description of the on-site sample preparation laboratory has been outlined in the RPA 2014 NI 43-101 Technical Report.

 


The key objective of the sample preparation laboratory is to ensure the prompt operation of a laboratory that processes samples to international standards using the best-known procedures and protocols and to ensure that adequate controls are in place for the effective and efficient operation of the facility.

The sample preparation laboratory is equipped with the necessary key sample preparation equipment, which together with the right procedures produce quality pulverised samples. Personnel with sample preparation experience have been recruited to operate the sample preparation laboratory. The pulps are dispatched to the SGS analytical laboratory in Mwanza for analysis. Producing pulps with a good turnaround time coupled with the reduction in cost of transporting whole samples, ensuring better QA/QC policing of the analytical laboratory, have all significantly impacted the efficiency of the exploration programme positively.

The SGS laboratory in Mwanza has sample preparation and analysis sections, which utilise the SGS standard procedures and control. SGS uses a laboratory information management system (LIMS) and has a QLAB system that is directly connected to the SGS laboratory network via the SGS laboratory information management system (SLIMS), which is used by SGS laboratories globally to generate client-specific reports and is the backbone of the SGS laboratory management and quality management systems. Typical samples sent to the SGS laboratory are accompanied by a sample submission form, which contains at least the following information:

  • Company name and complete address
  • Contact name
  • Details for distribution of reports and invoices
  • Method codes
  • Instructions on sample preparation
  • List or range of sample numbers

Once the samples are received at the SGS laboratory, the samples go through checking and reconciliation procedures, as listed below, followed by the SGS sample preparation procedure (SGS Code PRP87). The complete process includes the following:

  • Checking samples
  • Preparing sample reconciliation forms, which are sent to Loncor to confirm the quantities of samples received
  • Weighing samples
  • Drying field samples
  • Crushing samples to 75 % passing 2 mm
  • Splitting 1.5 kg by riffle splitter
  • Pulverising 1.5 kg of 2 mm material to 90 % passing 75 µm in a ring and puck pulveriser
  • Returning coarse and pulp rejects to Loncor upon request

Half of the drill core from Adumbi was sent to the SGS Mwanza laboratory while the other half core was stored at Loncor's core storage facility on site.


11.1.2 Sample Analysis

Drill core, trench, adit, pit, rock chip and channel samples were analysed for gold at the SGS Mwanza laboratory using fire assay (FA) with flame atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) to measure the gold (SGS Code FAA505), and the analyses were carried out on 50 g aliquots. The effective range for FAA505 is 0.01 ppm Au to 100 ppm Au. In addition, check assays were carried out by the screen fire assay method to verify higher-grade sample assays obtained by fire assay. Internationally recognised standards and blanks were inserted at the Adumbi sample preparation laboratory as part of internal QA/QC analytical procedures.

The pre-2014 sample analysis procedure by ALS Chemex Laboratory was described in the RPA 2014 NI 43-101 Technical Report.

11.1.3 BLEG Samples

All BLEG samples were sent to ALS Minerals in Ireland for analysis. The original and duplicate BLEG samples were assayed as follows:

  • No additional sample preparation was required.
  • Au, Ag, Cu and Pd were assayed by conducting a cyanide leach bottle roll test on up to 1 kg, with reporting limits for Au of 0.0001 ppm to 10 ppm (ALS Method: Au-CN12).
  • A suite of 53 elements was assayed by aqua regia digestion of 0.5 g of the sample, and analysed by ICP-MS and ICP-AES (ALS Method: ME-MS41L).

11.1.4 Stream Sediments

The original and duplicate samples were dried and disaggregated at the camp, and were submitted to the laboratory for analysis as follows:

  • Sieve to −180 micron (80 mesh).
  • Conduct a fire assay of the −180 micron (80 mesh) fraction for Au, using a 50 g charge (ALS Method: Au-AA24).
  • Conduct a test for a suite of 53 elements by aqua regia digestion of 0.5 g of the sample, and analysis by ICP-MS and ICP-AES (ALS Method: ME-MS41L).

11.2 QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL

Quality assurance (QA) consists of evidence to demonstrate that the assay data has precision and accuracy within generally accepted limits for the sampling and analytical method(s) used to have confidence in the resource estimations. Quality control (QC) consists of procedures used to ensure that an adequate level of quality is maintained in the process of sampling, preparing and assaying exploration samples.

In general, QA/QC programmes are designed to prevent or detect contamination and allow analytical precision and accuracy to be quantified. In addition, a QA/QC programme can identify the overall sampling and assaying variability of the sampling method itself. The programme can also determine the reporting accuracy for clerical and data transfer errors.

Accuracy is assessed by reviewing assays of commercially available certified reference material (CRM) or in-house standards where available, and by check assaying at external alternative accredited laboratories (referee, umpire, or check samples). Precision or repeatability is assessed by processing duplicate samples from each stage of the analytical process from the primary stage of sample splitting, through the sample preparation stages of crushing/splitting, pulverising/splitting, and assaying. Control samples can also help identify possible mix-ups or mislabels during sample preparation.


11.2.1 QA/QC Programme

Minecon has reviewed the QA/QC results for the Imbo Project, which includes the Adumbi, Kitenge and Manzako deposits. Kilo followed an industry-standard QA/QC programme with the regular submission of blanks and CRMs (standards) into the sample stream. However, there were no records of duplicates.

RPA, in their study in 2014, reviewed the QA/QC of the project data from 2010 to 2013, involving 33,230 field samples made up of adit, trench and drillhole samples, and provided a comprehensive report in their 2014 NI 43-101 Technical Report. The database included a total of 163 drillholes totalling 34.32 km of drilling. A summary of the QA/QC as provided by RPA is shown in Table 11.1.

Table 11.1: Summary of RPA 2014 QA/QC Review of the Database

Blanks

Field Duplicates

CRMs
(Standards)

Referee Samples

Number

Number or Percentage
of Failures

Number

Number

Number or Percentage
of Failures

Number

1,107

5 or 0.5 %

139

858

82 or 10 %

296

RPA made the following comments in their 2014 NI 43-101 Technical Report:

"RPA considers an overall CRM (Commercial Reference Material or Standard) failure rate of 2% to be acceptable. The Kilo inserted CRMs have a 10% failure rate which raises serious concerns with regard to precision at the assay laboratory and/or inadequate homogenization of the commercial standard. The CRM failures have not been re-assayed. RPA recommends that if a batch of samples has a CRM failure rate of over 2%, it should be re-assayed as a whole. In addition, RPA recommends that greater care be taken when naming a standard and sufficient material is supplied for assay."

Kilo, as part of the 2014 exploration programme, followed up on RPA's recommendations.

The standards and blanks results were interrogated with a view to identifying analytical batches or parts of batches that had failed the QC criteria and warranted re-assay. The failed samples from Adumbi were then prioritised, and re-assays were carried out at the SGS Mwanza laboratory.

This section of the report describes the QC criteria adopted by the exploration team and presents the re-assay results for Adumbi and discusses its implications. Table 11.2 provides a summary of the drill core samples, standards and blanks submitted for assay from the Adumbi, Kitenge and Manzako deposits in the pre-2013 drilling programme. Table 11.3 shows the standards submitted with the Kilo drill core samples.


Table 11.2: Summary of Drill Core Samples, Standards and Blanks Submitted for Assay from the Adumbi, Kitenge and Manzako Deposits

Deposit

Samples

Standards

Blanks

No.

%

No.

%

Adumbi

9,121

221

2.4

338

3.7

Kitenge

12,141

402

3.3

495

4.1

Manzako

7,176

230

3.2

265

3.7

Total

28,438

853

3.0

1,098

3.9

Table 11.3: Standards Submitted with Kilo Drill Core Samples

Standard

Au Grade (ppm)

Deposit

OxE101

0.607

Adumbi, Kitenge, Manzako

OxE74

0.651

Adumbi, Kitenge, Manzako

OxJ95

2.337

Kitenge, Manzako

OxJ64

2.366

Adumbi, Kitenge, Manzako

SJ39

2.641

Kitenge, Manzako

OxL93

5.841

Adumbi, Kitenge, Manzako

OxL63

5.865

Adumbi, Kitenge, Manzako

OxN49

7.635

Adumbi

To determine whether an analytical result for a particular standard lies within acceptable limits, data was inserted into an MS Excel spreadsheet dedicated to that standard. A standard control sheet, unique for each standard, generates charts based on control limits defined on the same general basis. The control limits are defined as 3 × SD (med mr) above and below the mean. The "SD (med mr)" is the standard deviation based on the median moving range and provides a more robust estimate than other straight standard deviation calculations.

Every laboratory-reported grade for an inserted standard is plotted on the standard control sheet that corresponds to the specific standard.

The standard control sheet shows the standard assay results and control limits in graph format, as shown in Figure 11.1. Standards that fall outside the defined tolerance are considered to have failed. In this performance chart, the last two samples can be seen to plot outside the control limits indicated by the red lines.


Figure 11.1: Standard Control Sheet Showing Assay Values, Mean and Control Limits for Standard OxN49

To ensure that the extent of failure is properly determined, samples that fall between the passing standard before the failed standard and the passing standard after the failed standard are selected for investigation.

The laboratory is then instructed to re-assay the samples between the first accepted standard above the failure to the first accepted standard below the failure, together with the three standards. The re-assay results for the standards are then assessed by means of the standard control sheet, and if accepted, the sample results are also accepted and entered into the project database. If any of the re-assayed standards are rejected, the procedure is repeated.

11.2.2 Accepting or Rejecting Assay Data using Standard Results

After using the standard control sheet to determine whether to accept or reject the assay result for a standard, the information is used to annotate the laboratory assay spreadsheet. As shown in the example in Figure 11.2, the accepted standard assays are highlighted in green, and the rejected standard assays are highlighted in red. This assists the process of selecting which samples are re-assayed by the laboratory as outlined in Section 11.2.1.


              

 

Annotated assay results sheet showing the samples selected for re-assay based on a rejected standard

 

Results sheet with re-assay results, showing that all
the results can be accepted

Figure 11.2: Assay and Re-Assay Results Sheets

11.2.3 Blanks


Theoretically, a blank will have a gold content below the analytical detection limit, which at most laboratories is 0.01 g/t (10 ppb) for a standard fire assay with a 50 g charge. However, instrumental and analytical errors may occur, and accidental contamination by gold-bearing material is possible, any of which may give a result above the detection limit.

For the current exercise, an upper limit of 0.03 g/t (30 ppb) Au was used for blanks, i.e., results > 0.03 g/t were rejected. The failed blank and associated samples were re-assayed, using the same principles as for failed standards.

The review resulted in the need for up to 3,820 samples representing 13.4 % of the entire drilling database for Adumbi, Kitenge and Manzako to go through another QC process. Of this total number of samples, 1,014 were from the Adumbi deposit and represented 11.1 % of the entire Adumbi database. The preferred samples to be selected for the resubmissions were pulp rejects from the original samples submitted. However, efforts made at Kilo's storage facility at Beni to retrieve the 1,014 samples as pulps yielded only 616 (61 %) pulps. For the rest of the samples, 382 (38 %) quarter cores were taken from the remaining half cores that were in Kilo's storage facility. The remaining 16 (1 %) samples could not be obtained as the hole (SADD0017) from which they were from had already been quartered for metallurgical studies.

The Adumbi samples were renumbered for resubmission to an umpire laboratory other than SGS for analysis. Emphasis was put on using similar analytical methods (50 g fire assay charge with AAS finish) as for the original samples by ALS. The samples were submitted with an insertion of 12 % of quality control material, made up of 8 % international standards and 4 % blanks.

Once the re-assayed results were received, the Kilo team undertook assessment of both the standards and blanks using the same criteria outline above.

Once all the checks were done and the new re-assayed values were determined as passed, they were compared to the earlier assays for the samples in the earlier database. The comparison in terms of correlational studies was made differently for samples submitted as pulps and those submitted as quarter cores on different grade ranges. In conclusion, the results of the pulps correlated very well with those for the original samples whereas those for the quarter cores showed some variation. The lesser correlation between the results comparing results from quarter cores with those from pulps of an earlier half core was expected as it is a known function of volume variance as well as nugget effect.

On the basis of these observations, the Kilo team assessed the impact of substituting the new re-assayed results on the mineralisation intercepts affected in terms of both widths and overall composited intercept grades, and they concluded that it was not worth replacing the old results in the database with the new ones, as they would not have any significant impact on the overall intercept widths and grades.

Minecon is of the opinion that as the re-assays all passed the QA/QC test, they should be used to replace the old results, and the process should not have ended with the correlation exercise. The resubmitted samples, even for the quarter cores, were submitted with an entire set of samples, including pulp splits from the original half core which went through QA/QC checks and passed; hence, they should have replaced the old sample results. The re-assaying exercise affected at least seven holes, namely SADD0001, SADD0004, SADD0005, SADD0010, SADD0011, SADD0012 and SADD0017, which went through the mineralised zones and impacted the interpretation; hence, replacing the old results with the new ones was necessary.


11.3 2014 TO 2017 QA/QC PROGRAMME

During the 2014 to 2017 exploration programme, the team continued with more stringent QA/QC protocols of inserting 8 standards and 4 blanks in every 100 samples submitted, i.e. 12 % QA/QC samples. It is worth noting that between 2010 and early 2011, Kilo submitted CRMs at a rate of 4 CRMs in a sample batch of 200.

The QA/QC database for the period 2014 to 2017 includes quality control samples inserted into samples collected from diverse sampling methods. Samples included BLEG, rock chip, pit, trench, channel and diamond drillhole samples. A total of 5,973 samples were submitted to the analytical laboratory for assaying. Table 11.4 provides a summary of the samples submitted during the period. A total of 525 standards and 289 blanks were inserted during the period, and the summarised performance of these QA/QC materials is as shown in Table 11.5 to Table 11.12.

Table 11.4: Summary of the Samples in the 2014 to 2017 Exploration Period

Number of Samples

Total

BLEG

Rock Chip

Pit

Trench Channels

Other Channels

DD

216

419

198

74

355

4,531

5,793

Colonial adits that had earlier been sampled were resurveyed but not resampled.

Of the 380 m of colonial trenches re-opened, 72.2 m of portions with good alteration known to be associated with mineralisation were sampled, yielding 74 samples.

The drilling data count included 998 samples from the pre-2014 drilling programme, which were sent for re-assay.

The quality control material introduced with these samples included 525 standards and 289 blanks. The rate of standards and blanks usage per the number of samples submitted was 9.1 % and 4.9 %, respectively. During the 2014 to 2015 period, 171 standards were inserted, and in the 2016 to 2017 period, 354 standards were inserted. Diamond drilling of a total of 38 holes (6,907.64 m) was undertaken during the 2016 to 2017 period on several prospects under the Imbo Licence, including Adumbi West, Kitenge Extension, Adumbi South and the four Adumbi deep holes. Table 11.5 summarises the drilling undertaken during the period.


Table 11.5: Summary of Drilling Undertaken in 2016 to 2017

Prospect

Number of Holes Drilled

Metres

Adumbi West

11

1,555.45

Kitenge Extension

14

2,169.60

Adumbi South

9

1,406.64

Adumbi Deep

4

1,775.95

TOTAL

38

6,907.64

A summary of the performance of the QA/QC materials inserted in all the exploration activities undertaken from 2014 to 2017 is shown in Table 11.6.

Table 11.6: Summary of Performance of QA/QC Materials Inserted in 2014 to 2017

Blanks

CRMs (Standards)

Number

Number or Percentage
of Failures

Number

Number or Percentage
of Failures

289

7 or 2.4 %

525

30 or 5.7 %

The source, type and other properties of the standards used are shown in Table 11.7.

Table 11.7: Source, Type, and Grade of Various Standards used in 2014 to 2017

CRM ID

Source

Material Type

Expected Grade
(ppm)

95 % Confidence Interval

OxA89

Rocklabs

Oxide

0.084

0.0025

OxE106

Rocklabs

Oxide

0.606

0.004

OxG99

Rocklabs

Oxide

0.932

0.006

OxG98

Rocklabs

Oxide

1.017

0.006

Oxi96

Rocklabs

Oxide

1.802

0.012

HiSilK2

Rocklabs

Sulphide

3.474

0.034

SK62

Rocklabs

Sulphide

4.075

0.045

HiSilP1

Rocklabs

Sulphide

12.05

0.130

OxP91

Rocklabs

Oxide

14.82

0.100

SQ48

Rocklabs

Sulphide

30.25

0.170

The standards used by Kilo considered both a broad grade range and different material types, oxides and sulphides, which Minecon considers good practice. The distribution of the standards across the various prospects is shown in Table 11.8.


Table 11.8: Distribution of Standards Across the Imbo Project

Prospect

HiSilK2

HiSilP1

OxG98

Oxi96

OxP91

SK62

SQ48

OxA89

OxE106

OxG99

Total

Adumbi Deep

14

11

12

15

11

12

11

 

 

 

86

Adumbi (2014 DD
Re-Assays)

19

 

 

19

 

 

18

18

19

 

93

Adumbi West
(2014 to 2015)

14

 

 

12

 

4

13

11

13

 

67

Adumbi West (2017)

6

9

12

12

11

10

9

 

 

 

69

Adumbi South

6

13

19

13

11

10

13

 

 

 

85

Kitenge Extension

1

8

7

15

11

15

12

 

 

 

69

Imbo West (BLEG)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

3

2

8

Ngazi (PE9692)

4

4

4

3

3

4

5

 

 

 

27

Dhahabu (PE9595)

1

1

2

1

 

1

 

 

 

 

6

Nane (PE140)

 

 

1

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

Gambi (PE137)

 

1

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

2

Vatican

1

 

 

2

 

 

1

 

 

 

4

Kitenge Senegal

1

 

 

1

 

1

2

 

2

 

7

TOTAL

67

47

57

94

48

57

84

32

37

2

525

A total of 4.9 % (30) of standards and 2.4 % (7) of blanks failed at the first submission. The overall performance of the standards is summarised in Table 11.9. Table 11.10 shows the summary of the performance of the standards across the prospects.

Table 11.9: Summary of Overall Performance of Standards Used

CRM Performance

CRM ID

TOTAL

HiSilK2

HiSilP1

OxG98

Oxi96

OxP91

SK62

SQ48

OxA89

OxE106

OxG99

Number of Times Used

67

47

57

94

48

57

84

32

37

2

525

Number of Passes

61

45

52

89

46

55

81

30

34

2

495

Number of Failures

6

2

5

5

2

2

3

2

3

0

30

Percentage Failure

9.0

4.3

8.8

5.3

4.2

3.5

3.6

6.3

8.1

-

5.7

Table 11.10: Summary of Overall Performance of Standards by Prospects

Prospect

CRM Performance

Number of Times Used

Number of Passes

Number of
Failures

Percentage
Failure

Adumbi Deep

86

82

4

4.7

Adumbi (2014 DD Re-Assays)

93

83

10

10.8

Adumbi West (2014 to 2015)

69

66

3

4.3

Adumbi West (2017)

67

67

0

-




Prospect

CRM Performance

Number of Times Used

Number of Passes

Number of
Failures

Percentage
Failure

Adumbi South

85

81

4

4.7

Kitenge Extension

69

65

4

5.8

Imbo West (BLEG)

8

8

0

-

Ngazi (PE9692)

27

23

4

14.8

Dhahabu (PE9595)

6

5

1

16.7

Nane (PE140)

2

2

0

-

Gambi (PE137)

2

2

0

-

Vatican

4

4

0

-

Kitenge Senegal

7

7

0

-

TOTAL

525

495

30

5.7

Figure 11.3 to Figure 11.6 are standard control charts plotted for QA/QC analyses of the various standards used in the Imbo Project.

Figure 11.3: Standard Control Performance Chart for Oxi96, Imbo Project


Figure 11.4: Standard Control Performance Chart for SK62, Imbo Project

Figure 11.5: Standard Control Performance Chart for HiSilP1, Imbo Project


Figure 11.6: Standard Control Performance Chart for OxP91, Imbo Project

The basic statistics of the blanks submitted as part of the QA/QC process are summarised in Table 11.11.

Table 11.11: Basic Statistics of Blanks Submitted as Part of 2014 to 2017 QA/QC Programme

Field

No. of Samples

Minimum
(ppm)

Maximum
(ppm)

Range

Mean
(ppm)

Variance

Standard Deviation

Au

288

0.005

0.09

0.090

0.014

0.000

0.011

11.3.1 Adumbi Deposit Standards Performance

Of the 525 standards inserted, 86 were inserted into the Adumbi drillhole samples submitted, which formed the core of the resource database for the Adumbi deposit.

The 86 standards represent 8 % of the 1,073 drillhole samples assayed. The summary of the standards used in the Adumbi deposit is given in Table 11.12. Table 11.13 provides a summary of the performance of the standards used for the Adumbi deposit.


Table 11.12: Summary of Standards used in QA/QC Programme for Adumbi Deposit

CRM ID

Certified Grade (ppm)

No. of Samples

Minimum
(ppm)

Maximum
(ppm)

Range

Mean
(ppm)

Variance

Standard
Deviation

(Std)

3Std

HiSilK2

3.474

14

3.44

3.60

0.16

3.503

0.002

0.040

0.120

HiSilP1

12.05

11

11.70

12.90

1.20

12.491

0.119

0.345

1.035

OxG98

1.017

12

0.98

1.19

0.21

1.033

0.003

0.050

0.150

Oxi96

1.802

15

1.75

1.85

0.10

1.813

0.001

0.025

0.074

OxP91

14.82

11

14.80

16.00

1.20

15.427

0.113

0.336

1.008

SK62

4.075

12

3.52

4.19

0.67

4.012

0.026

0.160

0.480

SQ48

30.25

11

29.40

32.40

3.00

30.873

0.893

0.945

2.835

Table 11.13: Summarised Performance of Standards Used in QA/QC Programme for Adumbi Deposit

CRM ID

Count

Certified Grade
(ppm)

Number Passed

Number Failed

Comment

HiSilK2

14

3.474

13

1

No re-assay submitted

HiSilP1

11

12.05

11

0

 

OxG98

12

1.017

10

2

1 failed re-assayed other not re-assayed

Oxi96

15

1.802

15

0

 

OxP91

11

14.82

11

0

 

SK62

12

4.075

11

1

No re-assay submitted

SQ48

11

30.25

11

0

 

Total

86

 

82

4

 

Figure 11.7 to Figure 11.13 are standard control charts plotted for QA/QC analyses of the various standards used in the Adumbi deposit only.


Figure 11.7: Standard Control Performance Chart for OxG98, Adumbi Deposit Only

Figure 11.8: Standard Control Performance Chart for Oxi96, Adumbi Deposit Only


Figure 11.9: Standard Control Performance Chart for HiSilK2, Adumbi Deposit Only

Figure 11.10: Standard Control Performance Chart for SK62, Adumbi Deposit Only


Figure 11.11: Standard Control Performance Chart for HiSilP1, Adumbi Deposit Only

Figure 11.12: Standard Control Performance Chart for OxP91, Adumbi Deposit Only


Figure 11.13: Standard Control Performance Chart for SQ48, Adumbi Deposit Only

There was a re-assay request for one of the four Adumbi standards that failed: Sample Number 61775 (OxG98) failed, and the re-assay results passed the QC check so the re-assayed result was used in the database. There were however no re-assay requests for the other three samples that failed (62207 (SK62), 62174 (OxG98) and 61325 (HiSilK2)). For 62174 (OxG98) and 61325 (HiSilK2), the Kilo team were of the view that they had passed when considered within the range of the entire standards of their kind submitted for the entire Imbo Project, hence re-assaying was not necessary. Minecon is however of the opinion that, the domain to determine the passing of the standards should have been Adumbi specific and not the entire project samples. The failure of 3 standards out of the 86 standards submitted represents a 3.5 % failure, which, in Minecon's opinion, is not fatal, but the team should have requested re-assays. In the absence of the re-assayed result, Minecon carried out visual checks on the adjacent samples to the failed standards to determine the possible impact of the failure on these nearby samples. Though no clear related impact could easily be seen, Minecon recommended that these samples be retrieved and submitted for re-assay.

The overall performance of the standards does not exhibit any bias. The frequency of the insertion of QC materials is adequate to enable the data to be used for geological modelling and resource estimation.


11.3.2 Blanks

Kilo, as part of their QA/QC programme, inserted blanks at a rate of 4 blank samples in every batch of 100 samples. The blanks sourced from Humac Laboratories Tanzania are stored at Adumbi in 50 × 20 L storage bins in a secured place.

As a way of checking the integrity of the stored blanks, the Kilo team collected blanks from 20 different bins, labelled them as normal samples, and submitted them to the SGS Mwanza laboratory for assaying. The results of the assays received are as shown in Table 11.14. All but one sample (Number 51255 from Bucket 18) returned results less or equal to 0.02 g/t, which is the accepted upper limit of a blank. The failed bucket was isolated, investigated, and not used as a blank.

Table 11.14: Results for Batch Testing of Blanks

Sample Number

Assay Result
(ppm)

SGS Job No.

Kilo Batch No.

Description

51237

< 0.01

MW141778

Batch 005

Bucket No. 1

51238

< 0.01

MW141778

Batch 005

Bucket No. 2

51239

< 0.01

MW141778

Batch 005

Bucket No. 3

51240

< 0.01

MW141778

Batch 005

Bucket No. 4

51241

< 0.01

MW141778

Batch 005

Bucket No. 5

51242

< 0.01

MW141778

Batch 005

Bucket No. 6

51243

< 0.01

MW141778

Batch 005

Bucket No. 7

51244

< 0.01

MW141778

Batch 005

Bucket No. 8

51245

< 0.01

MW141778

Batch 005

Bucket No. 9

51246

< 0.01

MW141778

Batch 005

Bucket No. 10

51247

< 0.01

MW141778

Batch 005

Bucket No. 11

51248

0.01

MW141778

Batch 005

Bucket No. 12

51249

< 0.01

MW141778

Batch 005

Bucket No. 13

51250

< 0.01

MW141778

Batch 005

Bucket No. 14

51251

< 0.01

MW141778

Batch 005

Bucket No. 15

51252

0.02

MW141778

Batch 005

Bucket No. 16

51253

< 0.01

MW141778

Batch 005

Bucket No. 17

51254

0.09

MW141778

Batch 005

Bucket No. 18

51255

< 0.01

MW141778

Batch 005

Bucket No. 19

51256

< 0.01

MW141778

Batch 005

Bucket No. 20

Of the 289 blanks inserted, 7 returned grades above 0.03 g/t, which is Kilo's accepted upper limit for blanks grade. These 7 samples are indicated in blue in Table 11.15. The blanks reported minimum and maximum grades of 0.005 g/t and 1.19 g/t, respectively. One failed blank reported a grade of 1.19 g/t, which is not a typical grade for a blank. This was discarded after checking the grade of adjacent samples in the same batch (Batch 70, SGS Job Number MW141774), which reported lower grades than it or even blank grades. The sample before it reported a grade of 1.06 g/t, and the one after it was < 0.01 g/t. Minecon suspects that this could have been due to sample swapping and not contamination. Therefore, although it has been included in the list of failed blanks, it has been discarded in any calculations or plots. Kilo made re-assay requests for some of the other failed blanks. The failure of 7 blanks represents a 2.4 % failure, which Minecon considers satisfactory. Table 11.15 displays the results of the failed blanks. Figure 11.14 shows a performance chart of all the blanks inserted in the 2014 to 2017 programme.


Table 11.15: Results of Failed Blanks

Sample Number

Assay Result
(ppm)

SGS Job No.

Kilo Batch No.

Prospect

61540

0.03

MW170761

Batch 076

Adumbi Deep

61990

0.03

MW171154

Batch 081

Adumbi Deep

56309

0.03

MW142179

Batch 009

Adumbi Pre-2014 Cores Re-Assays

56334

0.03

MW142179

Batch 009

Adumbi Pre-2014 Cores Re-Assays

56709

0.04

MW142183

Batch 013

Adumbi Pre-2014 Cores Re-Assays

57034

0.04

MW142186

Batch 016

Adumbi Pre-2014 Cores Re-Assays

56687

0.08

MW142182

Batch 012

Adumbi Pre-2014 Cores Re-Assays

57087

0.09

MW142192

Batch 019

Adumbi Pre-2014 Cores Re-Assays

57298

0.03

MW162448

Batch 041

Adumbi South

57824

0.03

MW162451

Batch 044

Adumbi South

59248

0.03

MW170400

Batch 059

Adumbi West

59374

0.03

MW170401

Batch 060

Adumbi West

59398

0.03

MW170401

Batch 060

Adumbi West

59916

0.03

MW170595

Batch 069

Adumbi West

61166

0.03

MW170597

Batch 071

Adumbi West

51982

0.07

MW150667

Batch 033

Adumbi West

51254

0.09

MW141778

Batch 005

Adumbi West

51162

1.19

MW141774

Batch 001

Adumbi West

66890

0.03

MW171641

Batch 092

Ngazi

NOTE: The values in blue indicate failed blanks.



Figure 11.14: Performance Chart of all Blanks Inserted in the 2014 to 2017 Programme

It was however noted that a further 12 samples returned with a grade of 0.03 g/t (see Table 11.15), this could have sent the percentage of failed blanks to 6.6 %. Minecon considers an upper limit of 0.02 g/t as tolerable for blanks. Minecon therefore recommended that any blank reporting a grade of greater than 0.02 g/t be flagged as failed and a re-assay request made for the sample and three adjacent samples before and after the failing blank. This recommendation was implemented during the 2020 to 2021 drilling programme. After checking the neighbouring samples of the failing blanks, Minecon does not think that there was any significant cross-contamination of the samples during the sample preparation process.

Minecon also recommended that re-assay requests be sent for all failed blanks. Upon receipt of re-assayed results, a decision could be made on whether to replace the results of adjacent samples in the database. Minecon noted that there were approximately 12 extra blanks listed as inserted, for which there were no results provided in the database. These blanks were investigated with respect to their adjacent samples.

11.3.3 Duplicates

The Kilo QA/QC programme did not include the submission of any duplicates. For drill cores, half cores were sent to the SGS Mwanza laboratory for preparation and assaying, and Kilo decided to keep the other half for further studies including metallurgical studies.


Duplicates are vital in QA/QC programmes as they assist in determining the repeatability or variability even at the local stage (nugget effect) inherent with sampling the same interval and detecting sample number mix-ups and even sample swapping.

Minecon recommended that Loncor incorporate the use of duplicates in the QA/QC programme. The recommendation was implemented during the 2020 to 2021 drilling programme. Duplicates were inserted at a rate of 1 in any 50 samples submitted. In the same way that standards of variable grade ranges are used to monitor the laboratory precision in various grade ranges, the duplicates selected were within the potential mineralised zones with varying grade ranges, to test the repeatability of grades in a wider range of grades. Duplicate samples were labelled in a disguised manner so that the analytical laboratory could not detect that they were duplicates. Duplicate samples were field (core, trench or underground), coarse (crushed reject), or pulp (pulverised reject) duplicates.

11.3.4 Inter-Laboratory Checks

For the period 2014 to 2017, Kilo did not submit any samples for inter-laboratory or refereeing checks. Inter-laboratory checks are essential in comparing the repeatability of grades of different splits of the sample by different laboratories. In the pre-2014 exploration programme period, Kilo sent approximately 296 Kitenge and Manzako pulps to the SGS Johannesburg laboratory for referee or umpire checks.

Now that Loncor is using the SGS Mwanza laboratory as the main laboratory, ALS Chemex was selected as the umpire laboratory. The umpire laboratory uses the same analytical method that the principal laboratory employed to facilitate comparison of the results obtained from the two different laboratories.

11.3.5 Review of External Laboratory Internal QA/QC Programme

The SGS Mwanza laboratory uses standards, blanks, duplicates and replicates as part of their internal QA/QC checks. The frequency of the QC materials usage is as follows:

  • 2 standards samples inserted in a batch of 50 samples
  • 1 preparation blank (prep process blank) inserted in a batch of 50 samples
  • 1 reagent blank inserted in a batch of 50 samples
  • 1 weighed replicate in every 50 samples
  • 1 preparation duplicate (re-split) in every 50 samples

Minecon has reviewed the internal QC reports submitted by the SGS laboratory during the period that they processed Kilo's samples and finds them all in order. Hence, there is no evidence of contamination or lack of precision in the laboratory processes.

A diverse grade range of standards from low-grade through medium to the higher-grade standards was used, and they all passed the QA/QC protocol. In addition, all the blanks inserted by SGS during the period passed, and no grade above 0.02 g/t was reported.

Duplicate correlation graphs showed high repeatability of results with a high correlation co-efficient in the 0.999 ranges.

Replicates also confirmed good repeatability.


11.4 SECURITY OF SAMPLES

For the period 2014 to 2017, the Kilo exploration team submitted all the samples to the SGS Mwanza laboratory for both sample preparation and chemical analysis. No employee, officer, director, or associate of Kilo carried out any sample preparation on samples from the Imbo exploration programme.

The drill core was transported from the drill site, by a Kilo vehicle or helicopter, to the secure core yard facility at the Adumbi base camp. Initially, all the samples collected for assaying were retained in a locked secure shed until they were dispatched by a Kilo vehicle to the administrative office in Beni. A commercial freight-forwarding agent then transported the samples from Beni to the SGS Mwanza Laboratory for sample preparation and analysis.

Dispatch forms accompany the samples from the field to the laboratory for analysis to verify each step of the process and to ensure that all samples are accounted for. The SGS laboratory sends sample reconciliation forms upon receipt of any batch of samples sent by Kilo through the forwarding agents to be sure that no sample losses or reduction occurs. All the half core was indexed and stored at the secured core storage facility at the Adumbi base camp.

11.5 2020 TO 2021 QA/QC PROGRAMME

During the 2020 to 2021 exploration programme, Loncor initiated enhanced QA/QC protocols. In a batch of 100 samples, 8 standards, 2 blanks and 2 duplicates were inserted, equivalent to 12 % of control samples. These control materials were inserted into all types of samples that were collected and processed during the period, prior to being dispatched to the SGS Mwanza laboratory for analysis.

All the analytical results received from SGS were subjected to Loncor's internal QA/QC checks. These included checking their performance with respect to the inserted control materials, made up of international CRMs, blanks, and duplicates. Batches that passed the checks were released to the database geologist for further verification and capturing into the validated master assay database. Per practice, batches that fail the internal QA/QC checks are subject to either partial or full re-assay requests, depending on the cause and extent of the failure. The re-assayed results are re-subjected to the same internal QA/QC checks. Only results that pass the QA/QC checks are entered into the master database.

By mid-October 2021, 7,675 samples had been received for processing at the sample preparation laboratory. A total of 8,020 samples were processed by the sample preparation laboratory. The processed samples included control samples such as blanks and other laboratory efficiency monitoring samples. A total of 8,743 samples of various forms, including QA/QC resubmissions, were dispatched to the SGS Mwanza laboratory for analysis during the period. These included 1,042 control samples, 708 standards, 205 blanks and 129 duplicates. The shortfall in duplicates was as a result of the delay in starting the introduction of the collection of duplicates. This represents an overall QA/QC percentage of 11.9 % with respect to the samples processed by the sample preparation laboratory by mid-October 2021.


Table 11.16: Summary of Samples sent to the Sample Preparation Laboratory for Processing

Number of Samples

Total

DD

Soils

Others

4,748

2,586

341

7,675

At the time of compiling this report, 26 core holes totalling 10,433.64 m had been drilled since the start of the 2020 to 2021 drilling campaign. Twenty-four holes were drilled at Adumbi-Canal and two holes were drilled at Mambo Bado (see Table 11.17).

Table 11.17: Summary of Drilling Undertaken in 2020 to 2021

Prospect

Number of Holes Drilled

Metres

Adumbi

22

9,711.84

Canal

2

359.60

Mambo Bado

2

362.20

TOTAL

26

10,433.64

The performance of the QA/QC materials, based on the results received to date for the 2020 to 2021 exploration programme, is summarised in Table 11.18.

Table 11.18: Summary of Performance of QA/QC Materials Inserted in 2020 to 2021

Blanks

CRMs (Standards)

Number

Number or Percentage
of Failures

Number

Number or Percentage
of Failures

205

3 or 1.5 %

708

14 or 2.0 %

The source, type and other properties of the standards inserted are shown in Table 11.19.

Table 11.19: Source, Type, and Grade of Various Standards used in 2020 to 2021

CRM ID

Source

Material Type

Expected Grade (ppm)

95 % Confidence Interval

OxA89

Rocklabs

Oxide

0.084

0.0025

OxE106

Rocklabs

Oxide

0.606

0.004

OxG99

Rocklabs

Oxide

0.932

0.006

HiSilK2

Rocklabs

Sulphide

3.474

0.034

SK62

Rocklabs

Sulphide

4.075

0.045

HiSilP1

Rocklabs

Sulphide

12.05

0.13

SQ48

Rocklabs

Sulphide

30.25

0.17

OXC109

Rocklabs

Oxide

0.201

0.002

SE44

Rocklabs

Sulphide

0.606

0.006




CRM ID

Source

Material Type

Expected Grade (ppm)

95 % Confidence Interval

SE114

Rocklabs

Sulphide

0.634

0.005

SG115

Rocklabs

Sulphide

1.017

0.005

SJ111

Rocklabs

Sulphide

2.812

0.021

The standards used by Loncor considered both a broad gold grade range and various material types: oxide and sulphide. The grade range is generally selected to match the sample types submitted, which Minecon considers good practice. The distribution of the standards across the various prospects is shown in Table 11.20.

Table 11.20: Distribution of Standards Across the Imbo Project

Project/Area

HiSilK2

HiSilP1

OXE106

OXG99

SE114

SE44

SG 115

SJ111

SK62

SQ48

OXA89

OXC109

Adumbi

86

72

1

7

56

11

52

55

87

32

 

 

Imbo East

 

 

40

35

 

 

 

 

 

 

42

41

Imbo West

 

 

13

12

 

 

 

 

 

 

14

11

Mambo Bado

5

3

 

 

 

4

 

 

6

1

 

 

Laboratory

 

 

7

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

4

TOTAL

91

75

61

59

56

15

52

55

93

33

62

56

A total of 2.0 % (14) of standards and 1.5 % (3) of blanks failed at the first submission. The overall performance of the standards is summarised in Table 11.21.

Table 11.21: Summary of Overall Performance of Standards Used

CRM Performance

CRM ID

HiSilK2

HiSilP1

OXE106

OXG99

SE114

SE44

SG 115

SJ111

SK62

SQ48

OXA89

OXC109

Number of Times Used

91

75

61

59

56

15

52

55

93

33

62

56

Number of Passes

90

75

60

57

56

15

50

51

91

33

61

55

Number of Failures

1

0

1

2

0

0

2

4

2

0

1

1

Percentage Failure

1.10

-

1.64

3.39

-

-

3.85

7.27

2.15

-

1.61

1.79

Figure 11.15 to Figure 11.18 are standard control charts plotted for QA/QC analyses of the various standards used in the Imbo Project.


Figure 11.15: Standard Control Performance Chart for HiSilK2, Imbo Project

Figure 11.16: Standard Control Performance Chart for SK62, Imbo Project


Figure 11.17: Standard Control Performance Chart for HiSilP1, Imbo Project

Figure 11.18: Standard Control Performance Chart for SQ48, Imbo Project


The basic statistics of the blanks submitted as part of the QA/QC process are summarised in Table 11.22.

Table 11.22: Basic Statistics of Blanks Submitted as Part of 2020 to 2021 QA/QC Programme

Field

No. of Samples

Minimum
(ppm)

Maximum
(ppm)

Range

Mean
(ppm)

Variance

Standard Deviation

Au

205

0.005

0.07

0.065

0.01

0

0.007

11.5.1 Adumbi Deposit Standards Performance

Of the 708 standards inserted, 459 were inserted into the Adumbi drillhole samples submitted, which formed the core of the resource database for the Adumbi deposit.

The 459 standards represent 9.6 % of the 4,746 samples assayed in relation to the Adumbi drillhole samples assayed. The summary of the standards used in the Adumbi deposit is given in Table 11.23. Table 11.24 provides a summary of the performance of some of the standards used for the Adumbi deposit.

Table 11.23: Summary of Standards used in QA/QC Programme for Adumbi Deposit

CRM ID

Certified Grade

(ppm)

No. of Samples

Minimum

(ppm)

Maximum

(ppm)

Range

Mean

(ppm)

Variance

Std

3Std

HiSilK2

3.474

86

0.01

4.04

4.03

3.394

0.168

0.410

1.229

HiSilP1

12.05

72

0.02

13.2

13.18

11.829

2.257

1.502

4.507

OXG99

0.932

7

0.91

0.96

0.05

0.933

0.000

0.019

0.057

SK62

4.075

87

2.08

4.95

2.87

3.981

0.115

0.339

1.018

SQ48

30.25

32

28.6

32.1

3.5

30.713

0.808

0.899

2.697

OXE106

0.606

1

0.59

0.59

0

0.590

-

-

-

SE44

0.606

11

0.59

0.63

0.04

0.615

0.000

0.010

0.030

SE114

0.634

56

0.5

0.75

0.25

0.624

0.002

0.042

0.125

SG 115

1.017

52

0.82

1.17

0.35

0.988

0.004

0.059

0.178

SJ 111

2.812

55

2.4

3.33

0.93

2.789

0.028

0.168

0.504

Table 11.24: Summarised Performance of Standards Used in QA/QC Programme for Adumbi Deposit

CRM ID

CRM Grade (ppm)

Count

Number Passed

Number Failed

Comment

HiSilK2

3.474

91

90

1

Re-assay returned 0.01 g/t, re-submitted Sample 82428 in Batch 191AD returned 3.45 g/t

HiSilP1

12.05

75

75

0

 

OXE106

0.606

61

60

1

Initial failure reporting 0.41 g/t passed upon re-assay

OXG99

0.932

59

57

2

1 swap between standard and sample resolved after re-assay in Batch 142LB




CRM ID

CRM Grade (ppm)

Count

Number Passed

Number Failed

Comment

 

 

 

 

 

Other failed standard in Batch 140IW passed on re-assay

SE114

0.634

56

56

0

 

SE44

0.606

15

15

0

 

SG 115

1.017

52

50

2

Initial failures reporting 0.82 g/t passed upon re-assay

SJ111

2.812

55

51

4

All initial failures resolved via re-assay in their batches

SK62

4.075

93

91

2

Initial failure returned slightly higher than 2SD but within 3SD, result used

 

 

 

 

 

Failed sample passed using acceptable AuR (gold assay replicate from SLIMS) value after inspecting adjacent samples

SQ48

30.25

33

33

0

 

Figure 11.19 to Figure 11.22 are standard control charts plotted for QA/QC analyses of the various standards used in the Adumbi deposit only.

Figure 11.19: Standard Control Performance Chart for HiSilK2, Adumbi Deposit Only


Figure 11.20: Standard Control Performance Chart for SK62, Adumbi Deposit Only

Figure 11.21: Standard Control Performance Chart for HiSilP1, Adumbi Deposit Only


Figure 11.22: Standard Control Performance Chart for SQ48, Adumbi Deposit Only

Though the results for some batches originally sent by SGS showed failure of some of the standards as per Loncor's internal QA/QC protocols, re-assay requests were promptly sent to SGS selecting the failed standards together with samples on either side of the failed sample up to the passing standards before and after the samples for re-assaying. In almost all the cases, the re-assayed results returned grades within the accepted tolerance. In such cases, the results that accompanied the passed standard were used in the database.

For batch number 137AD, the initial results issued by SGS for sample numbers 63020 and 63021 were as follows: 63020, a standard HiSilP1 (with a certified grade of 12.05 g/t), was assigned a grade of 0.02 g/t; and 63021, a normal field sample, was assigned a grade of 12.1 g/t. This suggests a swap of the two samples, possibly during the assaying process. A re-assay request was sent to SGS, and the re-assayed result confirmed the swap. The standard was now assigned the new grade of 11.9 g/t and the normal sample a grade of 0.01 g/t. There was also a re-assay request sent for the failed standard HiSilK2 (certified grade 3.474 g/t), submitted as Sample Number 62843 in batch 128AD together with other samples initially considered failed standards to the next passing standard above and below the standard. The re-assayed result still reported a grade of 3.71 g/t, which is within tolerable limits with the accumulated standards submission. For Sample Number 71008, a standard HiSilK2 (certified grade 3.474 g/t) inserted in Batch 191AD, SGS initially reported a grade of 0.01 g/t, but upon a re-assay request they reported 3.45 g/t, which is within the acceptable range.

In the absence of the re-assayed result, Minecon carried out visual checks on the adjacent samples to the failed standards to determine the possible impact of the failure on these nearby samples. Though no clear related impact could easily be seen, Minecon recommended that these samples be retrieved and submitted for assaying as part of the inter-laboratory checks, and most of these samples were accordingly included in the samples selected for inter-laboratory checks.


The overall performance of the standards does not exhibit any bias. The frequency of the insertion of QC materials is adequate to enable the data to be used for geological modelling and resource estimation.

11.5.2 Blanks

Loncor, as part of its QA/QC programme, inserted blanks at a rate of 4 blanks in every batch of 100 samples. This was reviewed to 2 blanks in every 100 samples with the introduction of duplicates in the QA/QC protocols.

The blanks sourced from Humac Laboratories Tanzania are stored at Adumbi in 50 × 20 L storage bins in a secured place.

As a way of checking the integrity of the stored blanks, the Loncor team collected blanks from 20 different bins, labelled them as normal samples, and submitted them to the SGS Mwanza laboratory for assaying. Routinely, the integrity of the blanks was tested by fetching representative samples from each bucket and submitting them for assaying to ensure that they were reporting blank grades, which Loncor has fixed at less or equal to 0.02 g/t.

An attempt has also been made to acquire some blanks from nearer sources like Beni for use as barren material for testing.

During the 2020 to 2021 period, representative samples from some of the purchased blanks were fetched from buckets and prepared by the sample preparation laboratory, and pulps of these were submitted to SGS for analysis.

The results of the assays received are as shown in Table 11.25.

From the results in Table 11.25, 31 out of the 46 buckets tested returned grades of less than or equal to 0.02 g/t. These were considered potentially useful for barren granites and were separated from the rest, which were discarded.

Table 11.25: Results for Batch Testing of Blanks

Sample Number

Assay Result
(ppm)

MW Batch

Loncor Batch No.

Description

81201

0.05

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B3

81202

0.04

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B8

81203

0.03

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B9

81205

0.03

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B12

81206

0.02

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B13

81207

0.02

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B14

81208

0.03

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B15

81209

0.02

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B16

81210

0.04

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B17




Sample Number

Assay Result
(ppm)

MW Batch

Loncor Batch No.

Description

81211

0.02

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B18

81212

0.02

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B19

81213

0.01

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B20

81214

0.02

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B21

81215

0.02

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B22

81216

0.01

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B23

81217

0.02

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B24

81218

< 0.01

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B25

81219

0.02

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B26

81220

0.02

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B27

81221

0.02

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B28

81222

0.02

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B29

81223

0.02

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B30

81224

0.02

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B31

81225

0.02

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B32

81226

0.02

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B33

81227

< 0.01

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B34

81228

0.02

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B35

81229

0.05

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B36

81231

0.03

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B37

81232

0.03

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B38

81233

0.03

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B39

81234

0.03

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B40

81235

0.02

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B41

81236

0.02

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B42

81237

0.03

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B43

81238

0.02

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B44

81239

0.04

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B45

81240

0.02

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B46

81242

0.03

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B47

81243

0.01

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B48

81244

0.03

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B49

81245

0.02

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B50

81246

0.02

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B51

81247

0.02

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B52

81248

0.02

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B53

81249

< 0.01

MW202297

BATCH 132IE

B54

For the 2020 to 2021 exploration QA/QC programme, out of the 205 blanks inserted, 3 returned grades above 0.02 g/t, which is Minecon's recommended ceiling for blanks. The blanks reported a minimum of 0.005 g/t and a maximum of 0.07 g/t.

It is worth noting that at the sample preparation laboratory, blanks are introduced into the sample processing process like any ordinary sample and thus go through the entire sample processing process that any other sample goes through. This ensures, in a way, that there is a check for cross-contamination within the sample preparation process.


The 3 blanks that failed out of 205 blanks represent 1.5 % of the blanks, which is considered satisfactory by Minecon.

Though the initial assay results that SGS reported had 14 sample grades above 0.02 g/t Au, a request for re-assay of the failed blanks and three adjacent samples on each side of the blank was made. The re-assay results that SGS reported showed that 11 of the samples passed as blanks leaving only 3 samples as true failures. Thus, the additional assaying beyond the initial report did not introduce further blank failures.

Of the three blanks that failed (sample numbers 67966 (0.03 g/t), 66598 (0.09 g/t) and 63369 (0.03 g/t) from batches 127IW, 139IW and 145AD, respectively), two of the samples failed again. Inspection of the results of the adjacent samples around Sample Number 63369 showed a grade lower than 0.03 g/t thus ruling out any possible cross-contamination. For Sample Number 66598, the samples around it reported relatively higher grades than it did, so cross-contamination cannot be completely ruled out.

Figure 11.23 shows the performance chart of all the blanks inserted for QC purposes in the 2020 to 2021 programme. Table 11.26 shows the results of the failed blanks.

Figure 11.23: Performance Chart for All Blanks Inserted in the 2020 to 2021 Programme

Table 11.26: Results of Failed Blanks




Sample Number

Assay Result
(ppm)

SGS Job No.

Loncor Batch No.

Prospect

66598

0.09

MW202438

139IW

Imbo West

66598

0.07

MW202438

139IW Re-assay

Imbo West

67966

0.03

MW202292

127IW

Imbo West

63369

0.03

MW210120

145AD

Adumbi

63369

0.03

MW210121

145AD Re-assay

Adumbi

11.5.3 Duplicates

Following from Minecon's recommendations in the April 17, 2020, NI 43-101 Technical Report on the need for duplicates to be included in Loncor's QA/QC programme, collection of duplicates was introduced into the process at the sample preparation phase in the sample preparation laboratory.

Duplicates are vital in QA/QC programmes as they assist in determining the repeatability or variability even at the local stage (nugget effect) inherent with sampling the same interval and detecting sample number mix-ups and even sample swapping. Duplicates are collected and inserted at a rate of 1 in every 50 samples.

Duplicates, like standards, are used to monitor the laboratory precision in various grade ranges; the duplicates selected should be within the potential mineralised zones with varying grade ranges to test the repeatability of grades in a wider range of grades. Duplicate samples can be field (core, trench or underground), coarse (crushed reject), or pulp (pulverised reject) duplicates.

The duplicates used in the QAQC report are second pulp splits collected at predetermined points during the sample preparation process. They are given different numbers from the original samples and submitted within the same batch to the assay laboratory for analysis.

Figure 11.24 shows the original versus duplicate sample assay plots inserted for QC in the 2020 to 2021 programme.


Figure 11.24: Original Versus Duplicate Assay Plots for Duplicates Inserted in the 2020 to 2021 Programme

The chart shows a good correlation between the original samples and their duplicates. This indicates a high repeatability of results with a high correlation co-efficient in the 0.98 region.

11.5.4 Inter-Laboratory Checks

Loncor submitted samples for inter-laboratory checks on a routine basis to ALS Chemex, RSA, which is independent of the company, which acts as the umpire laboratory to the primary laboratory, SGS Mwanza. Duplicate pulp samples covering the entire grade range were selected and dispatched to ALS. Loncor dispatched two batches of 200 samples each, including quality control materials for the same analytical method, for the first half of 2021, and another two batches were sent for the second half of 2021 later.

The initial results obtained have been checked and compared with the results obtained from SGS Mwanza. A comparison was done for the entire sample grade range and plotted as a chart (see Figure 11.25). The chart shows a generally good correlation between the assay results provided by the two analytical laboratories. To determine any potential bias in the higher-grade results (ore), the data was subsequently divided into less than 1.0 g/t and greater than 1.0 g/t. The mean absolute relative difference (MARD) has been calculated for the separated data. Table 11.27 shows the inter-laboratory comparison: SGS Mwanza vs ALS Chemex, RSA.


Figure 11.25: 2021 Inter-Laboratory Assay Comparison: SGS_MWZ vs ALS

Table 11.27: Inter-Laboratory Comparison: SGS Mwanza vs ALS Chemex, RSA

Au < 1.0 g/t

SGS MWZ

ALS_RSA

Au >1.0 g/t

SGS MWZ

ALS_RSA

Count

99

99

Count

88

88

Minimum (g/t)

0.005

0.005

Minimum (g/t)

1.05

1

Maximum (g/t)

0.93

1

Maximum (g/t)

70.20

67.00

Mean (g/t)

0.19

0.18

Mean (g/t)

6.46

6.23

Standard Deviation

0.23

0.24

Standard Deviation

8.99

8.70

MARD %

3.51

 

MARD %

3.55

 

The results obtained do not show any significant differences or bias between the results reported by the two analytical laboratories even though for the period covered by the results, SGS appears to be reporting slightly higher grades than ALS. Upon receipt and analysis of subsequent results, further studies will be conducted to determine periodic trends.

11.5.5 Sample Preparation Laboratory External Independent Audit

The Adumbi on-site sample preparation laboratory was successfully audited by SGS in September 2021.


11.5.6 Review of External Laboratory Internal QA/QC Programme

The SGS Mwanza laboratory uses standards, blanks, duplicates and replicates as part of its internal QA/QC checks. The results of the standards and blanks used are reported below the results of the samples submitted by Loncor in their respective batches.

The frequency of the QC materials usage is as follows:

  • 2 standards in a batch of 50 samples
  • 1 preparation blank (prep process blank) in every 50 samples
  • 1 reagent blank in every 50 samples
  • 1 weighed replicate in every 50 samples
  • 1 preparation duplicate (re-split) in every 50 samples

Minecon has reviewed the batch-by-batch results submitted by SGS and also the internal QC reports that SGS submitted during the period that they processed the Loncor samples. All the QA/QC materials performances are in order. Hence, there is no evidence of contamination or lack of precision in the laboratory processes.

A diverse grade range of standards from a broad grade range of 0.19 g/t Au to 16.2 g/t Au and standards of different material matrices were used by SGS Mwanza during the period under review. All except one of the standards passed their three standard deviation tolerance from the mean limit (SGS internal QA/QC protocol). In addition, all 231 blanks inserted by SGS during the period passed, reporting no grade above 0.02 g/t. Table 11.28 is a summary of the QC materials used by SGS Mwanza and the grade ranges reported.

Table 11.28: QC Materials Inserted by SGS in Samples Analysed for Loncor in 2020 to 2021

QC Material Type

Count

Minimum (g/t)

Maximum (g/t)

Blank

231

< 0.01

0.02

Standard

453

0.19

16.2

Replicates also confirmed good repeatability.

The umpire laboratory ALS Chemex RSA, used for inter-laboratory analysis, also used their internal QC material with the Loncor samples that they analysed and provided results which showed that all the materials passed their internal QA/QC protocols.

11.6 RECOMMENDATIONS

Minecon recommends the following:

  • Loncor should continue with the process of umpire check on the SGS results. Although the process has commenced, more routine (quarterly) inter-laboratory check will be required to enhance the quality control process.
  • Loncor should continue with the routine independent audit of the sample preparation laboratory by external auditors to maintain standards and adopt new ideas.

12 DATA VERIFICATION

Additional information regarding the Imbo Project with respect to data verification is set out in Minecon's technical report dated April 17, 2020, entitled "Independent NI 43-101 Technical Report, on the Imbo Project, Ituri Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo" (available from SEDAR at www.sedar.com).

The information in this section relates to Loncor's current exploration programme at Adumbi.

12.1 SITE VISIT

A site visit was carried out by Daniel Bansah, Chairman and Managing Director of Minecon, from February 12 to 20, 2020. Christian Bawah was also on site for a period of eight weeks from October to November 2020. Mr Bawah was accompanied by Peter Kersi, a contributing engineer to this report. Also on the trip were the following Minecon geologists and other technical personnel: Bel Mapendo, chief geologist, Patient Zamakulu, senior geologist, and three of Minecon's laboratory technical and operational staff.

Tasks undertaken during the visit included a technical inspection of the site, an inspection of the old drill core, a review of all the technical work carried out from 2014, including work carried out following RPA's 2014 recommendations but not limited to the sampling and drill site protocols and security, as well as QA/QC issues and the ALS Minerals on-site sample preparation facility.

Gordon France, Minecon's Database, GIS and IT Manager, visited the Adumbi site for seven weeks from June to July 2021. The scope of work during the visit was to ensure that the Adumbi database was migrated onto a centralised data repository (the Century Database System).

In September 2021, Mr Bansah undertook another visit to the Adumbi site. During the visit, he spent time reviewing all the field geological activities undertaken on the Adumbi deposit, the geological logging and sampling procedures, including the sampling preparation protocols carried out in the sample preparation laboratory. Mr Bansah also reviewed the geological interpretation work carried out by Minecon's site team.

The Minecon team worked in collaboration with Fabrice Matheys, Loncor's General Manager and geologist with +25 years of experience in the DRC and the African region.

The following list summarises Minecon's site visit comments with reference to the CIM Exploration Best Practices Guidelines:

  • Qualified Person - Loncor's General Manager, Fabrice Matheys, is a very experienced geologist with many years of DRC exploration experience, particularly on the Ngayu Greenstone Belt.
  • Geological Concept - Loncor has developed a robust geological deposit and structural model that will guide future exploration from target generation, drilling and evaluation. A review of the results of the holes drilled in Adumbi in 2020 to 2021 confirms the down-plunge extension of the mineralisation.
  • On-Site Sample Preparation and QA/QC Controls - The on-site sample preparation laboratory was originally set up and managed by ALS Minerals with the requisite standards but was not operational for the 2013 to 2017 exploration programme. Minecon provided the needed technical skills and management to provide guidelines to recommission the on-site sample preparation laboratory and provided the needed skills to improve the QA/QC procedures to align with Industry Standards. An analysis was carried out by the SGS Mwanza analytical laboratory in Tanzania. As part of the audit trail, SGS Mwanza carried out an independent audit of the sample preparation laboratory in September 2021.

  • Data Capturing and Standard Operating Procedure - In Minecon's opinion, Loncor has a comprehensive procedural manual SOP for all data capture. Minecon has worked with Loncor, and all the Loncor data is currently being migrated into a centralised database management system (FUSION), which is more secure than the storage of data in MS Excel format.
  • Core Photographs - Minecon has developed a modified platform that allows core photographs to be taken from a fixed location with a stationary camera with enhanced and consistent resolution.
  • Sampling - Sampling procedures are appropriate to the deposit style. Samples are collected under the supervision of key technical personnel who are trained by the QP. Key personnel understand why they employ the various sampling methods. Duplicate sampling has been introduced to raise the QA/QC measures to best industry standards.
  • Drilling - Drilling procedures are appropriate to the deposit style. Core recovery in the weathered profile (oxide) is poor. For the extension and deep drilling programme, the mineralised zones were intersected at a depth which has competent rocks, and excellent recoveries were achieved. For future infill drilling, an appropriate RC rig will be secured to manage the shallow infill holes.
  • Sample Security - Sample storage and sample security procedures are found to be robust and appropriate.
  • Database Management Audit - Minecon identified some minor issues with the MS Excel database that was used for the previous modelling and resource estimation. The migration of the database into a more secured platform and the training and mentoring of the database administrator have improved the security of the database. Periodic independent database audits by external technical consultants are recommended to ensure that the database is in good order and that minor data issues can be identified and fixed. Following the external audit of the database, a compliance certificate can be issued.
  • Health, Safety, Environment and Community (SHEC) - SHEC procedures currently in place on site need improvements, and site-based protocols and reporting should be better structured. The personal protective equipment (PPE) is adequate for this level of exploration programme on site. Steps should be taken to systematically backfill all the open trenches. Minecon also recommends a structured and a more routine engagement with the community and other stakeholders including government structures even though community relations at local, district, provincial and central government level appear good.

12.2 DRILLHOLE, TRENCH AND ADIT DATA

Currently, all the forms of project data that were stored in MS Excel and other data formats are being migrated into a secured industry standard database system, FUSION.

The Datamine Studio RM version 1.6.8.7.0. (Datamine) software has been applied by Minecon on the modelling data for verification, validation and manipulation of the Adumbi drillholes, adit and trench data using the inherent verification, validation and manipulation protocols within the Datamine software.

Prior to the mineral resource updates, Minecon's technical personnel consistently carried out verification and validation exercises, including "from and to intervals" and "end of hole depths". The lithological description of two of the zones on one hole was reviewed with site geologists and was modified to conform to the lithology of that section from the drill core.

Statistical manipulation of the uploaded assay data from the submitted databases showed that several samples reported Au grades of 0. Further checks need to be done to verify these as analytical laboratories do not report 0 g/t Au.

12.3 INDEPENDENT AUDIT AND WITNESS SAMPLING

Minecon independently reviewed and audited the Adumbi database. During the audit, Minecon identified that the majority of the resource database was stored on MS Excel data sheets and was in good order, and only minor data issues were identified. All the data that was flagged as having minor issues was isolated and corrected before being released and added to the database. Minecon is currently assisting Loncor to migrate the cleaned-up data into a centralised database repository system, FUSION.

No independent witness sampling was carried out on the six new holes as Minecon technical personnel were involved in the sampling process. On the previous samples, Minecon also did not carry out any independent witness sampling. For this, Minecon has relied on the previous independent witness samples collected and analysed during RPA's site visit of 2013 and concurs with the conclusions of that study.

12.4 DISCUSSION

Minecon is currently supporting Loncor to migrate all the cleaned-up data sets into an industry standard secured centralised database repository and management system. This will ensure data security and will minimise potential data errors.

A full-time database administrator has been employed by Loncor at the Adumbi site to manage the database. Minecon's database manager is helping to train the database administrator using a customised front-end application that has been designed for data entry, reporting, and viewing via open database connectivity (ODBC), which utilises the data validation procedures from the central database. All the other geological software databases on site will be linked to retrieve information from a centralised repository.

Validated assay data from the assay certificates will be imported directly from the laboratory. This task can be undertaken only by fully trained and authorised network users.


12.5 RECOMMENDATIONS

Minecon is happy with the speed of the migration of the database into the industry-standard secured centralised database repository and management system but recommends that the implementation and training process be expanded to other Loncor technical personnel and not just the database administrator.


13 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING

13.1 INTRODUCTION

The recent (2021) metallurgical test work on the Adumbi deposit was carried out at Maelgwyn Mineral Services Africa (MSA) in South Africa. The test work programme was developed for Loncor by SENET.

Previous metallurgical test work was conducted on oxide and sulphide ore at the Wardell Armstrong International (WAI) laboratory, and the test work findings are in the following reports/documents:

  • WAI, August 2011, "Characterization Testwork on Samples of Gold Ore from Adumbi Deposit, Democratic Republic of Congo", Report Number MM584.
  • WAI, October 2011, "Optimization Testwork on Samples of Gold Ore from Adumbi Deposit, Democratic Republic of Congo", Report Number MM601.
  • WAI, December 2011, "Flotation and Leach Optimization Testwork on Samples of Gold Sulphide Ore from Adumbi Deposit, Democratic Republic of Congo", Report Number MM626.
  • RPA, February 2014, "Technical Report on the Somituri Project Imbo Licence, Democratic Republic of the Congo - NI 43-101".

13.2 SUMMARY

Historical metallurgical test work conducted in 2011 on oxide and fresh ore indicated the following:

  • Comminution Bond ball work index (BBWi) test work indicated that the oxide and fresh ores are medium hard with BBWi values of 10.46 kWh/t and 11.76 kWh/t, respectively.
  • Both the oxide and fresh ores respond well to gravity concentration.
  • The oxide ore is free milling.
  • The fresh ore contains both refractory and non-refractory gold.
  • Further metallurgical test work was performed on the refractory fresh sample to try to improve gold recovery. The results were as follows:
  • The ore responded well to flotation, giving 96 % gold recovery to a rougher concentrate.
  • Fine milling the flotation concentrate to 80 % passing 10 µm with oxygen sparging gave a low gold extraction of 18.4 %.
  • Use of kerosene and lead nitrate did not improve gold extraction.
  • Roasting (an aggressive oxidation process) was not effective and increased gold extraction on the flotation concentrate to 63.2 % only.

The most recent test work was conducted in 2021 on oxide, transition and fresh samples. Table 13.1 shows a summary of the test work results.


Table 13.1: Summary of the Test Work Results

Parameter

Oxide

Transition

Fresh

Fresh RP

Fresh BIF

Ore Characterisation

Specific Gravity (SG) - SENET

2.85

3.07

3.09

3.17

SG - OMC

2.70

2.80

2.90

As (ppm)

2,133

4,443

12,877

7,008

Ag (g/t)

0.87

1.10

0.07

0.08

Bulk Density

1.80

-

3.00

Au (g/t)

1.34

3.25

-

-

Comminution

BBWi (kWh/t) - SENET

11.58

13.6

14.6

BBWi (kWh/t) - OMC

11.8

13.7

14.2

Bond Rod Work Index (BRWi)

-

-

-

Uniaxial Compressive Strength (UCS)

-

-

-

Crushability Work Index (CWi)

-

-

-

Abrasion Index (Ai) (g) - SENET

0.1899

0.2519

0.3560

Ai (g) - OMC

0.19

0.25

0.34

Gold Recovery

Proposed Process Route

Gravity + CIL

Gravity + CIL

Gravity + CIL

Gravity + CIL

Gravity Recovery (%)

36.82

31.58

29.61

31.66

Intensive Leach Reactor (ILR) (%)

96.25

94.61

83.53

85.19

CIL on Gravity Middlings and Tailings (G M&T) (%)

89.05

88.23

75.34

63.25

Overall Recovery - Gravity + Leach (%)

91.70

90.24

77.77

70.20

Gold Recovery (used for Mining and Process Design) (%)

90.76

87.53

80.10

89.83

Cyanide Consumption (kg/t)

0.87

1.19

1.45

0.91

Lime Consumption (kg/t)

3.09

4.85

2.00

4.11

Rougher Flotation Recovery (% Au)

-

95.52

93.03

85.13

Rougher Mass Pull (% w/w)

-

16.83

26.59

21.76

Rougher Flotation Recovery (% S)

-

95.52

93.03

85.13

As-is Leach on Float Concentrate - Oxygen Sparging (%)

-

90.32

61.42

65.81

Ultrafine Grinding (UFG) (12 µm) Leach on Float Concentrate - Oxygen Sparging (%)

-

91.27

75.53

66.74

As-is Leach on Float Tailings - Oxygen Sparging (%)

-

86.89

73.19

66.36

Overall Gold Recovery - Gravity - Flotation - Cyanidation (%)

-

91.77

77.73

72.57

The Adumbi ore responded well to gravity. Gravity followed by cyanidation on the oxide and transition ores gave good overall gold recoveries of 91.70 % and 90.24 %, respectively. However, the fresh RP and BIF gave lower gold recoveries of 77.77 % and 70.20 %, respectively. Due to the low recoveries on the fresh RP and BIF, flotation was investigated to try and improve gold recoveries. Flotation on the transition, fresh RP and BIF showed rougher flotation recoveries of 95.52 %, 93.03 % and 85.13 %, respectively.


The flotation concentrate samples generated were not sufficient to enable further processing routes such as

  • Fine milling followed by leaching with oxygen addition
  • Fine milling followed by partial oxidation using high shear reactors and leaching
  • Albion process
  • Pressure oxidation
  • Bio leaching
  • Roasting

These recovery processes will be investigated during the next phase of the project to optimise the gold recovery in the transition and fresh ore types


14 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES

14.1 APPROACH

The Adumbi three-dimensional updated model was constructed by Minecon in collaboration with on-site geologists using cross-sectional and horizontal flitch plans of the geology and mineralisation to assist in constraining the 3D geological model. The mineralisation model was constrained within a wireframe at a 0.5 g/t Au cut-off grade. Grade interpolation was undertaken using the following:

  • 2 m sample composites capped at 18 g/t Au to improve the reliability of the block grade estimates. Capping affected approximately 1 % of the samples.
  • Ordinary Kriging to interpolate grades into the block model.
  • Relative densities of 2.45 for oxide, 2.82 for transition and 3.05 for fresh rock applied to the block model for tonnage estimation.

After grade interpolation, Minecon used visual inspection in sections and plan views, together with other validation methods, to ensure that the resultant model reflected the drilling database used.

To constrain the depth extent of the geological model and any mineral resources, an open pit was constructed for the Adumbi deposit based on the following pit optimisation parameters:

  • A gold price of US$1,600/oz
  • A block size of 16 m × 16 m × 8 m
  • A 32 m minimum mining width and a maximum of 4 m of internal waste was applied
  • A mining dilution of 100 % of the tonnes at 95 % of the grade
  • An ultimate pit slope angle of 45°
  • Metallurgical recoveries of 91 % for oxide, 88 % for transition and 90 % for sulphide (based on diagnostic metallurgical test work as part of the study)
  • An average reference mining cost of US$3.29/t mined
  • An average processing cost of US$14.63/t for oxide, US$16.30/t for transition and US$18.43/t for sulphide
  • An average general and administration cost of US$4.20/t
  • Mineral resources were estimated at a block cut-off grade of 0.52 g/t Au for oxide, 0.57 g/t Au for transition and 0.63 g/t Au for fresh material, constrained by a US$1,600/oz optimised pit shell
  • Transport of gold and refining costs equivalent to 4.5 % of the gold price
  • No additional studies on depletion by artisanal activity have been undertaken since the RPA 2014 study, and the same total amount of material was used by Minecon

All the blocks with grades above the cut-off grade within the Whittle open-pit shell truncated at the surface by the topography were reported as open-pit mineral inventory. Historical mining based on estimates used in the RPA 2014 NI 43-101 technical report was depleted from the final resource estimates as there have been no further studies undertaken on depletion by artisanal mining since the RPA 2014 NI 43-101 technical report.

 


The definitions for Mineral Resource categories used in this estimate are consistent with those set out in S-K 1300 and in the CIM 2014 Definition Standards as incorporated in NI 43-101.

14.2 RESOURCE DATABASE

A total of 73 diamond drillholes made up of 46 re-logged, 4 holes drilled in 2017, and the 23 newly drilled holes in the 2020 to 2021 drilling programme were used in the updated mineral resource estimate. These holes totalled 20,806.97 m and provided 12,415 assays, which were used in the Adumbi mineralisation and geological interpretation, and resource model creation. A 24th hole, LADD0026, was also drilled up to 705 m. Hole LADD0026 had very good intercepts when the results were received. Assays for Hole LADD0026 were not used in the resource modelling due to the delay in receiving the results for this hole. However, the geological data captured for this hole, coupled with the team's understanding of the mineralisation controls at Adumbi, assisted in defining the geometry of the orebody and lithological model in the vicinity of the hole. The holes drilled in the 2020 to 2021 programme were drilled with the initial focus in areas within the pit shell where insufficient drilling had been undertaken to outline mineral resources. The upper parts were infilled at closer spacing in order to upgrade portions of the mineral resources into a higher confidence category. Later drilling has been and is being undertaken at depth below the open-pit shell to outline potential underground mineral resources. The ongoing exploration programme intersected significant grades that supported the down-dip/plunge extension of the mineralisation.

Table 14.1 shows some of the significant intercepts from the holes drilled in 2020 to 2021 which have been incorporated into the current model.

Table 14.1: Significant Intercepts from Drillholes Drilled in 2020 to 2021

Borehole From
(m)
To
(m)
Intercept Width
(m)
Grade
(g/t Au)
LADD001 202.58 223.35 20.77 1.72
LADD001 231.27 237.17 5.9 1.89
LADD001 251.27 258.6 7.33 5.8
LADD001 295.25 298.7 3.45 2.1
LADD001 301.62 321.95 20.33 2.47
LADD001 Including 317.11 321.95 4.84 5.4
         
LADD003 224.55 235 10.45 3.88
LADD003 253.5 286.8 33.3 3.25
LADD003 Including 253.50 259.2 5.7 7
LADD003 Including 277.73 286.8 9.07 5.11
         
LADD004 429 457 28 3.26
LADD004 Including 432.00 436.9 4.90 6.96
LADD004 Including 450.62 454.15 3.53 8.3
LADD004 473.8 478.4 4.60 2.07
LADD004 505.85 526.15 20.3 2.83



Borehole From
(m)
To
(m)
Intercept Width
(m)
Grade
(g/t Au)

LADD004

Including 506.85

513.4

6.55

4.64

LADD004

Including 523.85

526.15

2.30

7.25

 

 

 

 

 

LADD006

299.37

302.25

2.88

2.64

LADD006

308

309

1

21.2

LADD006

322.1

337.3

15.2

1.67

LADD006

353.35

357.85

4.5

3.25

 

 

 

 

 

LADD007

99.95

107.8

7.85

1.45

LADD007

540.62

596.05

55.43

2.76

LADD007

Including 583.60

596.05

12.45

8.11

LADD007

607.9

611.27

3.37

4.61

 

 

 

 

 

LADD008

235.05

278.15

43.1

1.68

LADD008

291.8

298.9

7.1

1.34

LADD008

305.15

305.93

0.78

21.8

LADD008

323.8

338.78

14.98

3.62

LADD008

Including 335.75

338.78

3.09

13.28

 

 

 

 

 

LADD009

559.76

564.76

5

3.17

LADD009

581.9

614.05

32.15

6.17

LADD009

Including 599.05

600.51

1.46

94.77

LADD009

629.56

644.92

15.36

3.73

LADD009

Including 632

637.89

5.89

6.56

LADD009

650.5

657.95

7.45

1.48

 

 

 

 

 

LADD012

784.35

797.8

13.45

3.63

LADD012

Including 784.35

786.35

2

9.56

LADD012

806.3

810.35

4.05

4.73

 

 

 

 

 

LADD013

394.06

401.1

7.04

2.68

LADD013

418.65

438.65

20

4.21

LADD013

Including 419.75

430.75

11

6.91

LADD013

452.3

469.6

17.3

2.48

LADD013

Including 457.35

465.55

8.2

4.71

 

 

 

 

 

LADD014

670

681.8

11.8

2.97

LADD014

Including 670

673.53

3.53

6.44

 

 

 

 

 

LADD015

24.43

31.5

6.07

1.77




Borehole From
(m)
To
(m)
Intercept Width
(m)
Grade
(g/t Au)

LADD016

672.85

680.94

8.09

1.9

LADD016

731.51

757.1

25.59

2.39

LADD016

Including 737.18

743.27

6.09

4.78

LADD016

Including 749.67

752.56

2.89

4.98

LADD016

672.85

680.94

8.09

1.9

 

 

 

 

 

LADD017

45.55

62.7

17.15

1.9

LADD017

92.68

118.45

25.77

6.24

LADD017

Including 100.76

110.05

9.29

9.68

LADD017

Including 112.95

118.45

5.5

9.75

 

 

 

 

 

LADD018

93.34

113.7

20.36

0.93

LADD018

152.48

178.2

25.72

2.26

 

 

 

 

 

LADD019

4.57

11.6

7.03

2.13

 

 

 

 

 

LADD021

75.21

88.17

12.96

2.09

LADD021

99.74

106

6.26

1.09

LADD021

144.78

160.51

15.73

5.28

LADD021

Including 144.78

149.78

5

13.7

 

 

 

 

 

LADD022

20.5

42

21.5

2.23

LADD022

Including 25.5

34

8.5

4.23

 

 

 

 

 

LADD023

227.1

261.73

34.63

3.12

LADD023

Including 231.65

237.4

5.75

7.23

LADD023

Including 248.1

255.25

7.15

5.55

LADD023

270.43

300.25

29.82

1.77

 

 

 

 

 

LADD024

216.15

227.65

11.5

3.47

LADD024

Including 224.1

227.65

3.55

7.79

LADD024

235.97

253.75

17.78

3.2

 

 

 

 

 

LADD025

258.38

266

7.62

1.16

LADD025

279.5

286.35

6.85

3.44

LADD025

301.1

311.57

10.47

1.74

LADD025

321.6

336.2

14.6

2.11

LADD025

342.65

361.75

19.1

4.11

LADD025

Including 349

357.75

8.75

5.4




Borehole From
(m)
To
(m)
Intercept Width
(m)
Grade
(g/t Au)

NOTES:
1. Core holes LADD002 and LADD005 were discontinued before intersecting the mineralised zone.
2. Core hole LADD026, which reported 22.03 m grading 5.11 g/t Au (including 14.70 m grading 7.19 g/t Au) and
     11.20 m grading 4.93 g/t Au, was not included in the current mineral resource update due to timing.
3. It is estimated that the true widths of the mineralised sections for the drillholes are as follows:
 LADD001 (82 %), LADD003 (80 %), LADD004 (81 %), LADD006 (95 %), LADD007 (89 %),
 LADD008 (62 %), LADD009 (82 %), LADD012 (86 %), LADD013 (85 %), LADD014 (78 %),
 LADD015 (65 %), LADD016 (69 %), LADD017 (71 %), LADD018 (75 %), LADD019 (65 %),
 LADD021 (73 %), LADD022 (58 %), LADD023 (76 %), LADD024 (77 %) and LADD025 (78 %) of the
      intercepted widths given in this table.

The database included nine resurveyed adits with a total length of 1,121 m yielding 868 assayed samples. Trench and adit data has been used to support the geological and mineralisation interpretation and in the grade interpolation process. All 73 drillholes intersected the interpreted mineralisation, within which 4,740 samples (38.2 % of all drillhole assays) were selected by the mineralisation wireframe.

Table 14.2 shows some basic statistics of the number of samples in the database that informed the interpretation, and the number of each type of sample that has been captured in the mineralisation wireframe.

Table 14.3 shows a simple count of the distribution of mineral intercepts over the various lithologies at Adumbi.

Table 14.2: Basic Statistics of All Adumbi Samples and Selected Samples within Wireframe Model

Field No. of
Samples
Min.
(g/t)
Max.
(g/t)
Mean
(g/t)
Variance Logvar Cov Description
Au 14,403 0.01 170 0.84 13 4.45 4.3 All Adumbi DD log samples
Au 4,740 0.01 170 2.17 31 2.97 2.56 Selected Adumbi DD samples within ore wireframe
Au 1,731 0.01 90 2.11 18 2.32 2.01 Selected Adumbi DD samples, composited 2 m uncapped
Au 1,731 0.01 18 1.97 7.35 2.29 1.38 Selected Adumbi DD samples, composited 2 m capped at 18 g/t
Au 868 0 12.4 0.29 0.7 3.57 2.87 All Adumbi resurveyed adit log samples
Au 1,010 0 12.8 0.37 0.82 2.04 2.42 All Adumbi trench log samples
Au 264 0.02 12.8 0.98 2.43 1.7 1.58 Selected Adumbi trench samples within ore wireframe
Au 130 0 12.4 0.79 2.39 2.49 1.97 Selected Adumbi resurveyed adit samples within ore wireframe


Table 14.3: Distribution of Mineral Intercepts over Various Lithologies at Adumbi

Description

Lithology

BIF

QCS

RP

CBS

CS

QV

IQCS

CBS-AS

ICQS

BCH

Intercept Count

1,851

772

592

412

394

207

181

160

135

42

14.3 BULK DENSITY

Minecon applied the revised relative densities of 2.45 for oxide, 2.82 for transition, and 3.05 for fresh rock to the block model for tonnage estimation.

Additional information regarding the Imbo Project with respect to the determination and application of bulk density is set out in Minecon's technical report dated April 17, 2020, and entitled "Independent National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report on the Imbo Project, Ituri Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo" (available from SEDAR at www.sedar.com).

Table 14.4 shows the relative density measurements used for the Minecon resource estimation.

Table 14.4: Relative Density used for Minecon Resource Estimation

Type

Mineralised

Unmineralised

No. of Samples*

Relative Density

No. of Samples*

Relative Density

Oxide

297

2.45

882

2.26

Transition

178

2.82

601

2.54

Sulphide

796

3.05

1953

2.83

* Excludes samples which were not assayed

14.4 WIREFRAME AND 3D MODELLING

Wireframe models of the geological domains aided in the interpretation and modelling of the mineralisation and grade continuity studies as well as to constrain the block model interpolation. A joint team of Minecon resource evaluation personnel and on-site geologists undertook the interpretation of the various zones, which aided the creation of the Adumbi model. The software used to build the model was Datamine. The mineralisation is structurally controlled. Other models, including the redox surfaces and the digital terrain, were modelled using the triangulation tools available in Datamine.

14.4.1 Geological Wireframe and Modelling

A lithological model was created and used to guide the mineralisation modelling. In creating the lithological model, drillhole logging data for Hole LADD0026 (for which assay data was not available at the time of the modelling process) was used to assist in defining the geometry within the vicinity of the hole. Figure 14.1 is a 3D view of the Adumbi deposit lithological model.


Figure 14.1: Adumbi Deposit - 3D of Lithological Model

It is worth noting that, all the major lithologies contained some level of mineralisation but with variable average grades, some of which were below the mineralisation cut-off grade.

The primary Adumbi database was made up of a combination of drillholes and trenches, and the resurveyed adits were desurveyed in the Datamine software and plotted. Geological and mineralisation interpretation was undertaken in both sections and flitches by Minecon's combined technical team.

Interpretation of the Adumbi mineralisation was developed using a 0.5 g/t Au sample cut-off. Cross sections were generated on a 040 bearing along a mineralisation trending 130°. Section lines were on drill fences spaced between 60 m and 95 m, with an average spacing of 75 m. The interpretations were digitised in Datamine software, and strings were snapped to drillholes. Where necessary, a simplification of the mineralised outlines was undertaken using assay values lower than the cut-off grade of the material to ensure geological continuity, tolerating up to 4 m of internal waste. Three main mineralised zones (Zones 1, 2 and 3) were observed in the Adumbi central area (counting the zones from the footwall). Whilst digitising the ore perimeter strings, Zone 2 was split into two zones named 2U and 2L, thus making a total of four zones. This split was necessary to avoid the inclusion of wider than 4 m internal low-grade bands. Zones 1 and 2 are separated by the carbonaceous marker, which is essentially unmineralised. Generally, Zone 1 is within the Lower BIF sequence, Zone 2 is in the lower part of the Upper BIF Sequence, and Zone 3 is a weaker zone in the upper part of the Upper BIF Sequence. Figure 14.2 is a section through Boreholes SADD0005, 0049, 0053, LADD0015, 001, 004 and 009 showing the 2020 to 2021 interpreted ore outlines.


Towards the southeastern end around the Canal prospect, there is another footwall-mineralised zone thus making five main zones. Figure 14.3 is a flitch at RL560 showing the ore outline interpretation.

The trench and adit information was used to assist with the up-dip continuity of the interpretation where drillhole information was lacking but trench or adit data indicated the continuity of the mineralisation. Down-dip extrapolations beyond the limits of drilling were done to ensure consistency in shape and orientation with due consideration to available geological knowledge. In such instances, up to 100 m extensions were done on some sections, and to ensure continuity along strike extrapolations were 40 m. All the digitised strings were linked to create the 3D mineralised wireframe. The strike length of the mineralised wireframe is 2.3 km. Figure 14.4 is a 3D view of the Adumbi mineralisation wireframe.

Figure 14.2: Sections through SADD0005, 0049, 0053, LADD0015, 001, 004 and 009 showing 2020-21 Interpreted Mineralised Outlines


Figure 14.3: Flitch at RL560 showing Interpreted 2021 Ore Outline

Figure 14.4: 3D View of Adumbi Mineralisation Wireframe


14.4.2 Digital Terrain Model

At Adumbi, Minecon used 10 m interval contours to generate a DTM in Datamine software.

This DTM model was used for the geological modelling and model depletion for the estimation of resources.

14.4.3 Redox Surfaces and Modelling

The BOCO and TOFR surface models were created from each of the 73 drillholes by digitising them in cross sections and wireframing to create models for each surface. The previous surface models were refined by the new information from the extra 18 holes drilled in the 2020 to 2021 programme. There were minor modifications as a result of the newly drilled holes but no significant impact. The digitised surface interpretation strings from each of the sections were linked to create wireframe surfaces in Datamine.

Figure 14.5 shows a typical section of the location of redox surfaces used by Minecon in the April 2021 model compared with the updated November 2021 redox surfaces.

Figure 14.5: Sections through Adumbi Model showing Relative Location of Redox Surfaces used by Minecon in April 2021 vs November 2021

14.5 ASSAY CAPPING

To avoid undue influence of random anomalous high grades on the resource determination, Minecon prepared histograms, probability plots and other graphs and used these to study the various grade distributions of the selected samples. Selected samples within the Adumbi mineralisation wireframe were composited to 2 m. The assay grades appear reasonably independent of sample length (see Figure 14.6) and thus allow for capping based on grades. A suitable capping of 18 g/t Au of the selected samples was applied after studying the distribution from the histogram (see Figure 14.7), frequency log grade graph (see Figure 14.8) and probability plot (see Figure 14.9) to improve the reliability of the block grade estimates.


Figure 14.6: Plot of Adumbi Selected Sample Grades vs Sample Lengths


Figure 14.7: Histogram of Selected Au Distribution

Figure 14.8: Frequency vs Log Grade Plot of Selected Samples


Figure 14.9: Probability Plot of all the Selected Gold Assays

The application of the capping significantly reduced the noise in the assay grade database as seen in the significant drop of both the variance and co-efficient of variation (see Table 14.5). The 18 g/t Au capping affected 18 samples (1 %) of the composited samples. Most of the samples affected by capping were in Zone 2 (BIF mineralised zone), though their concentration in Zone 2 suggests that they could be real and not discrete such that capping was utilised as a conservative control. It is worth noting also that the Adumbi gold grades do not show any direct correlation with the sample length, so capping is permissible. Minecon did further reviews on the impact of using a lower cap on the resource but decided to use the 18 g/t Au cap as lower capped grades affected a greater number of samples and thus impacted the overall resource.


Table 14.5: Descriptive Statistics of Selected and 2 m Composite and Capped Samples within Mineralised Zones

Field No. of Samples Min.
(g/t)
Max.
(g/t)
Mean
(g/t)
Variance Logvar Cov Description
Au 4,740 0.01 170 2.17 30.96 2.97 2.56 Selected Adumbi DD samples within ore wireframe
Au 1,731 0.01 90 2.11 17.98 2.32 2.01 Selected Adumbi DD samples, composited 2 m uncapped
Au 1,731 0.01 18 1.97 7.35 2.29 1.38 Selected Adumbi DD samples, composited 2 m capped at 18 g/t
Au 868 0 12.4 0.29 0.70 3.57 2.87 All Adumbi resurveyed adit log samples
Au 130 0 12.4 0.79 2.39 2.49 1.97 Selected Adumbi resurveyed adit samples within ore wireframe
Au 264 0.02 12.8 0.98 2.43 1.70 1.58 Selected Adumbi trench samples within ore wireframe
Au 92 0.01 24.1 2.21 10.11 3.29 1.44 All Zone 5 2 m composite samples
Au 442 0.01 23.8 2.61 12.21 3.65 1.34 All Zone 1 2 m composite samples
Au 636 0.01 62.4 2.20 22.19 2.18 2.15 All Zone 2L 2 m composite samples
Au 351 0.01 90 1.83 28.26 2.27 2.9 All Zone 2U 2 m composite samples
Au 135 0.01 7.59 1.21 1.85 2.60 1.13 All Zone 3 2 m composite samples
Au 92 0.01 18 2.15 7.58 3.27 1.28 All Zone 5 2 m composite capped at 18 g/t samples
Au 442 0.01 18 2.55 10.10 2.24 1.25 All Zone 1 2 m composite capped at18 g/t samples
Au 636 0.01 18 1.98 8.06 2.13 1.43 All Zone 2L 2 m composite capped at 18 g/t samples
Au 351 0.01 18 1.59 4.67 2.22 1.36 All Zone 2U 2 m composite capped at 18 g/t samples
Au 135 0.01 7.59 1.21 1.85 2.60 1.13 All Zone 3 2 m composite capped at 18 g/t samples

14.6 ASSAY INTERVAL COMPOSITING

The dominant sample length in the Adumbi drillhole database is 1 m. Figure 14.10 shows the select sample length versus count. The mean sample length is 0.75 m. Approximately 70 % of the selected samples had sample lengths in the range 0.5 m to 1.5 m. Minecon applied 2 m down-the-hole sample compositing to reduce the variability of the data for samples selected within the mineralised wireframe. Compositing of the selected samples was restricted to the individual zones within the wireframe. The restrictions ensured that the geological and mineralisation definition was maintained. The minimum composite length was set to 1 m. The Datamine compositing parameter (MODE) was set to Value 1 to ensure that every sample fitted into one of the composites. The descriptive statistics of the samples selected within the mineralisation prior to compositing and after compositing are shown in Table 14.6. A histogram of the resulting 2 m composite lengths at MODE=1 is illustrated in Figure 14.11.


Figure 14.10: Select Sample Length vs Count

Table 14.6: Descriptive Statistics of Selected Samples within Mineralised Zones from Wireframes

Field

No. of samples

Min.

(g/t)

Max.

(g/t)

Mean

(g/t)

Variance

Logvar

Cov

Description

Au

222

0.01

26.80

2.64

20.02

3.51

1.69

All Zone 5 samples

Au

1,242

0.01

80.20

2.76

24.36

2.99

1.79

All Zone 1 samples

Au

1,779

0.01

170.00

2.15

44.24

3.07

3.09

All Zone 2L samples

Au

939

0.01

117.00

1.80

31.95

2.67

3.15

All Zone 2U samples

Au

350

0.01

13.30

1.28

2.85

2.11

1.32

All Zone 3 samples

Au

92

0.01

24.14

2.21

10.11

3.29

1.44

All Zone 5 2 m composite samples

Au

442

0.01

23.76

2.61

12.21

3.65

1.34

All Zone 1 2 m composite samples

Au

636

0.01

62.43

2.20

22.19

2.18

2.15

All Zone 2L 2 m composite samples

Au

351

0.01

90.01

1.83

28.26

2.27

2.90

All Zone 2U 2 m composite samples

Au

135

0.01

7.59

1.21

1.85

2.60

1.13

All Zone 3 2 m composite samples



Figure 14.11: Histogram of the resulting 2 m Composite Lengths at MODE=1

14.7 MINERALISATION CONTINUITY AND VARIOGRAPHY

For the variography analysis, Minecon used the selected samples within the mineralisation wireframe, composited into 2 m and capped at 18 g/t Au as input data into Datamine to generate and study the variograms in several directions: downhole, along strike, down-dip and cross structure. The capping was to aid in getting smoother variograms.

Variograms were re-modelled for mineralised zones with sufficient samples to support meaningful variograms, and the parameters obtained were applied to all the mineralisation. The nugget value derived from the downhole variogram was fixed at 0.17. A typical example of the variograms, the along strike variogram, is shown in Figure 14.12. Variograms will be reviewed as and when more drilling data becomes available in future.


Figure 14.12: Adumbi Variograms and Models in Different Directions

The parameters used in the volume model parameter file are as listed in Table 14.7.


Table 14.7: Variogram Model Parameters

VREFNUM

VANGLE1

VANGLE2

VANGLE3

VAXIS1

VAXIS2

VAXIS3

NUGGET

ST1

1

225

89

0

3

1

0

0.17

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ST1PAR1

ST1PAR2

ST1PAR3

ST1PAR4

ST2

ST2PAR1

ST2PAR2

ST2PAR3

ST2PAR4

180

120

55

0.38

1

227

151

72

0.45

14.8 BLOCK MODELS

The Adumbi block model origin and block size are outlined in Table 14.8.

Table 14.8: Adumbi Block Model Origin and Block Size

Parameter

Easting

Northing

RL

Model Origin

594,200

191,200

−300

Parent Block Sizes (m)

4

4

4

Subcells

2

2

2

The model limits are in Table 14.9.

Table 14.9: Adumbi Model Limits

Field

Minimum

Maximum

Range

Easting

594,584

596,101

1,516

Northing

191,432

193,196

1,763

RL

−101

780

881

The orientation of the model is 135° along the strike of the mineralisation. The number of blocks in the various dimensions as per the above model limits are Easting (380), Northing (440) and vertical (220). The along strike length of the model is 2,300 m.

14.9 INTERPOLATION SEARCH PARAMETERS AND GRADE INTERPOLATION

The Adumbi deposit mineral resource was estimated by Minecon using Ordinary Kriging with the ellipsoidal search parameters as listed in Table 14.10.

Table 14.10: Ellipsoidal Search Parameters

DIST1

SDIST2

SDIST3

SANGLE1

SANGLE2

SANGLE3

SAXIS1

SAXIS2

SAXIS3

180

120

55

225

89

0

3

1

0

The search ellipsoid was aligned along the strike of the mineralisation with a long axis search range along the strike of 180 m, a down-dip search range of 120 m, and a cross-structure search range of 55 m based on the average ranges obtained from the principal direction through variography. The dip of the mineralisation is almost vertical and hence set to 89°.


A minimum of 2 samples and maximum of 24 samples were used to effect the grade interpolation. Zonal restriction was applied. A two times expansion of the search volume was utilised by setting the SVOLFAC to 2 to ensure that most blocks had grades interpolations into them.

A block model prototype (see Table 14.11) was prepared and used to fill the Adumbi closed-volume geological wireframe with cells.

Table 14.11: Adumbi Block Model Prototype

Parameter

Easting

Northing

RL

Model Origin

594,200

191,200

−300

Parent Block Sizes (m)

4

4

4

Number of Blocks in Different Directions

575

575

280

The surface topography DTM was used to trim the upper part of the model. Subcell splitting was used along other surfaces, including BOCO and TOFR, to preserve the shape of the mineralisation. Each cell of the prototype was uniquely assigned one of the three oxidation states. The wireframe interpretation of the various mineralised zones, though continuous, shows considerable variability in the local strike directions. The estimation process used the Dynamic Anisotropy optional feature of Datamine. True dip and dip azimuths were calculated from the wireframe triangles. These were then angle-estimated into the blocks using inverse distance squared interpolation (with adaption for circular data). Appropriate constraints were applied to avoid inappropriate angles from the edges of truncated wireframes. Block grades were estimated using Ordinary Kriging, which used the local orientation of the search ellipsoid. Grades were estimated into parent cells. Two passes were made for grade interpolation. Restrictions were employed so that only grades within particular zones influenced that zone grade interpolation. The BOCO and TOFR model surfaces were used to control the assignment of relative densities to the various material types in the model: oxide (2.45), transition (2.82) and fresh (3.05).

14.10 HISTORICAL AND ARTISANAL MINING DEPLETION

No additional studies on depletion by artisanal activity have been undertaken since the RPA study. Minecon has therefore subtracted the same amount of material reported as depletion by RPA in the 2014 studies from the final estimates, assuming that all the material is oxide. A total of 19,361 oz of gold, 457,000 t at a grade of 1.32 g/t was subtracted as depletion due to historical mining. Minecon was unable to verify depletion due to historical and artisanal mining activities.

It is important that further works be undertaken to help better estimate depletion due to historical and recent artisanal mining.


14.11 RESOURCE CLASSIFICATION

As per the requirements of S-K 1300 and NI 43-101:

A Mineral Resource is a concentration or occurrence of natural, solid, inorganic material, or natural solid fossilised organic material including base and precious metals, coal, and industrial minerals in or on the Earth's crust in such form and quantity and of such a grade or quality that it has "reasonable prospects for economic extraction."

Mineral Resources are classified into Measured, Indicated and Inferred categories (within the meaning of S-K 1300  and NI 43-101) based upon increasing geological confidence. In addition, resource classification within mineralisation envelopes are generally based on drillhole spacing, grade continuity, and overall geological continuity. The distance to the nearest composite, amount of extrapolation from last drillhole, number of samples used to interpolate grades into blocks, and the number of drillholes are also considered in the classification.

There is increased understanding of the geology and mineralisation controls of the Adumbi deposit following the technical works undertaken between 2010 and 2021.

The Adumbi Mineral Resource has been classified into Indicated and Inferred Resources. This was informed by improved confidence in the geological knowledge of the Adumbi deposit, well established mineralisation and geological continuity, increased drilling data density and increased reliability of the database, amongst other considerations.

In portions of the model where drilling data spacing consistency reaches 80 m, block cells estimated from sampling within a one-variogram range search ellipsoid, supported by positive Kriging efficiency (KEF), were identified and confined using sectional digitised strings. The strings were linked to form a wireframe surface which was used to select and flag confidence levels into the orebody. Cells falling within this wireframe surface were classified as Indicated and those falling within a two-variogram range, supported by adequate number of samples for valid local estimates and lying within the US$1,600/oz optimised pit shell, were classified as Inferred. Figure 14.13 shows a section through the model coloured on the KEF values and classified as Indicated and Inferred.


Figure 14.13: Section through Model Coloured on KEF Values and Classified as Indicated and Inferred Resource

14.12 CUT-OFF GRADE PARAMETERS

Minecon, in consultation with Loncor Management, employed a gold price of US$1,600/oz for in-pit optimisations to limit and constrain the Adumbi deposit in-pit resources.

Pit Optimisation Parameters

To constrain the depth extent of the geological model and any mineral resources, an open pit was constructed for the Adumbi deposit based on the following pit optimisation parameters:

  • A gold price of US$1,600/oz
  • A block size of 16 m × 16 m × 8 m
  • A 32 m minimum mining width and a maximum of 4 m of internal waste was applied
  • A mining dilution of 100 % of the tonnes at 95 % of the grade
  • An ultimate pit slope angle of 45°
  • An average mining cost of US$3.29/t mined
  • Metallurgical recoveries of 91 % for oxide, 88 % for transition and 90 % for sulphide
  • An average general and administration cost of US$4.20/t
  • Mineral resources were estimated at a block cut-off grade of 0.52 g/t Au for oxide, 0.57 g/t Au for transition and 0.63 g/t Au for fresh material, constrained by a US$1,600/oz optimised pit shell
  • Transport of gold and refining costs equivalent to 4.5 % of the gold price
  • No additional studies on depletion by artisanal activity have been undertaken since the RPA 2014 study, and the same total amount of material was used by Minecon

The preliminary open-pit shell provided a constraint for the reported open-pit resources based on the S-K 1300 and NI 43-101 requirement for Mineral Resources to have "reasonable prospects for economic extraction".

All the model blocks with grades above the block cut-off grade of 0.52 g/t Au for oxide, 0.57 g/t for transition and 0.63 g/t Au for fresh material within the US$1,600/oz pit shell and truncated at the surface by the topography were reported as a mineral resource for Adumbi (see Figure 14.14).


Figure 14.14: Adumbi Model Section showing the US$1,500/oz April 2021 Inferred Resource Pit Shell and the US$1,600/oz November 2021 Pit Shell

The results of the Adumbi pit optimisation (see Figure 14.15) resulted in 1.88 Moz of gold (28.19 Mt grading 2.08 g/t Au) for the Indicated Mineral Resource and 1.78 Moz of gold (20.83 Mt grading 2.65 g/t Au) for the Inferred Mineral Resource constrained within the US$1,600/oz pit shell. Figure 14.16 shows the Adumbi model coloured by material type.


Figure 14.15: Adumbi Section showing Resource Model with Holes coloured on Grade and the US$1,500/oz April 2021 Pit Shell and the US$1,600/oz November Pit Shell

Figure 14.16: Adumbi Block Model coloured by Material Type: Oxide, Transition and Fresh


Figure 14.17 shows the 3D grade model illustrating the previous Minecon US$1,500/oz pit shell (April 2021) and the current US$1,600/oz pit shell (November 2021).

Figure 14.17: 3D Grade Model showing the April 2021 US$1,500/oz and
November 2021 US$1,600/oz Pit Shell

The grade-tonnage curves for the Adumbi mineral resources at various gold cut-offs are summarised in Table 14.12 and shown in Figure 14.18.

Table 14.12: Adumbi Mineral Resource Sensitivity by Cut-Off Grade

Block Cut-Off

Tonnage

Grade

Contained Gold

g/t Au

Mt

g/t Au

Moz

0.0

51.60

2.23

3.70

0.5

50.10

2.29

3.68

1.0

41.15

2.61

3.45

1.5

29.07

3.17

2.97

2.0

21.76

3.66

2.56

2.5

16.06

4.17

2.15

3.0

12.12

4.63

1.80



Figure 14.18: Grade-Tonnage Curve for Adumbi Mineral Resource

14.13 MODEL VALIDATION

Minecon carried out various block modelling validation procedures to check the robustness of the model. These included the following:

  • Visual comparison of the block grades versus the composited grades used to interpolate the grades into the block in section and plan
  • Statistical comparison
  • Comparison of individual blocks and composite grades
  • Model extent comparison
  • Cross validation
  • Check conducted on search ellipsoid orientations

A visual comparison of the block model grades with the adjacent composite drillhole grades that were used to interpolate grades into them showed a good correlation. Figure 14.19 to Figure 14.21 show Minecon's block model with the US$1,500/oz April 2021 Inferred Resource pit shell outline and the current November US$1,600/oz pit shell outline.

A statistical comparison of the mean grade of the block model with the mean composited grades of the selected samples within the mineralised wireframe showed a good correlation, suggesting that there was not much bias in the estimation process (see Table 14.13).

The model and wireframe extents compared well (see Table 14.14).

The overall volumes of the mineralised wireframe and the block model compared very well.


The cross-validation graph that was generated also showed that there was a good correlation between the means of the actual grades and the estimate grades, thus also supporting the estimation parameters used (see Figure 14.22).

All the blocks within the block model were checked to ensure that they have been assigned a reasonable grade, the appropriate density, and material type classification based on inputs used.

Checks were conducted on search ellipsoid orientations to ensure that it followed expected orientations during grade interpolation (see Figure 14.23).

Figure 14.19: Adumbi Deposit Model Flitch at RL560 Coloured on Grade US$1,500/oz April 2021 Pit Shell and US$1,600/oz November 2021 Pit Shell


Figure 14.20: Adumbi Model Section showing the US$1,500/oz April 2021 Inferred Resource Pit Shell and the US$1,600/oz November 2021 Pit Shell


Figure 14.21: Adumbi Section showing Resource Model with Holes Coloured on Grade and the US$1,500/oz April 2021 Pit Shell and the US$1,600/oz November Pit Shell

Table 14.13: Statistical Comparison of Block Model and Selected Samples within Wireframe

Field

No. of Samples

Min. (g/t)

Max. (g/t)

Mean (g/t)

Variance

Logvar

Cov

Description

Au

4,742

0.01

170

2.18

30.95

2.96

2.56

Selected Adumbi DD samples within ore wireframe

Au

1,731

0.01

90.01

2.11

17.98

2.32

2.01

Selected Adumbi DD samples, composited 2 m uncapped

Au

1,731

0.01

18

1.97

7.35

2.29

1.38

Selected Adumbi DD samples, composited 2 m capped at 18 g/t

Au

5,391,813

0.01

15.16

2.09

2.45

0.76

0.75

Block model samples



Table 14.14: Model vs Ore Wireframe Extent Comparison

Field

Block Model

Ore Wireframe

Difference

% Difference

 

Minimum

Minimum

 

 

X

594,584

594,584

0.1

0.0

Y

191,433

191,429

3.0

0.0

Z

(101)

(101)

0.4

(0.4)

 

Maximum

Maximum

 

 

X

596,101

596,102

−0.9

(0.0)

Y

193,196

193,198

−2.0

(0.0)

Z

780

780

0.0

(0.0)

Figure 14.22: Cross-Validation Graph


Figure 14.23: Search Ellipsoid Orientation for Grade Interpolation

14.14 MINERAL RESOURCE REPORTING

Minecon has prepared this Mineral Resource estimate for the Adumbi deposit, with a drillhole database cut-off date of October 10, 2021.

The Adumbi Mineral Resource estimate has an effective date of November 17, 2021. The resource is made up of the resources contained in the US$1,600/oz optimised pit with a block cut-off grade of 0.52 g/t Au for oxide, 0.57 g/t Au for transition and 0.63 g/t Au for fresh material. Table 14.15 summarises the Adumbi Mineral Resources. A total of 84.68 % of the Adumbi mineral resources are attributable to Loncor via its 84.68 % interest in the Imbo Project.

Table 14.15: Adumbi Deposit Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources
(Effective Date: November 17, 2021)

Mineral Resource Category Tonnage
(t)
Grade
(g/t Au)
Contained Gold
(oz)
Indicated 28,185,000 2.08 1,883,000
Inferred 20,828,000 2.65 1,777,000
NOTES:
1. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.
2. Numbers might not add up due to rounding.


Table 14.16 summarises the Adumbi Indicated and Inferred category mineral resources in terms of material type.

Table 14.16: Adumbi Mineral Resources by Material Type
(Effective Date: November 17, 2021)

Material Type

Indicated Mineral Resource

Inferred Mineral Resource

Tonnage

(t)

Grade

(g/t Au)

Contained Gold

(oz)

Tonnage

(t)

Grade

(g/t Au)

Contained Gold

(oz)

Oxide

3,169,000

2.05

208,000

458,000

3.39

49,000

Transition

3,401,000

2.51

274,000

280,000

2.74

24,000

Fresh (Sulphide)

21,614,000

2.02

1,400,000

20,089,000

2.64

1,703,000

TOTAL

28,185,000

2.08

1,883,000

20,828,000

2.65

1,777,000

NOTES:

1. Mineral resources were estimated at a block cut-off grade of 0.52 g/t Au for oxide, 0.57 g/t Au for transition and 0.63 g/t Au
      for fresh material constrained by a Whittle pit. 

2. Mineral Resources for Adumbi were estimated using a long-term gold price of US$1,600/oz.

3. A minimum mining width of 32 m horizontal was used.

4. A maximum of 4 m internal waste was used.

5. Adumbi bulk densities of 2.45 for oxide, 2.82 for transition and 3.05 for fresh rock were used.

6. High gold assays were capped at 18 g/t Au for Adumbi, prior to compositing at 2 m intervals.

7. Numbers might not add up due to rounding.

The Imbo Project Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resource for the combined Adumbi, Manzako and Kitenge deposits now respectively totals 1.88 Moz of gold (28.19 Mt grading 2.08 g/t Au) and 2.09 Moz of gold (22.50 Mt grading 2.89 g/t Au). The total Inferred Resource is summarised in Table 14.17.

Table 14.17: Inferred Mineral Resource for the Imbo Project
(Effective Date: November 17, 2021)

Deposit

Tonnage

(t)

Grade

(g/t Au)

Contained Gold

(oz)

Adumbi

20,828,000

2.65

1,777,000

Kitenge

910,000

6.60

191,000

Manzako

770,000

5.00

122,000

TOTAL

22,508,000

2.89

2,090,000

NOTES:

1. Mineral resources were estimated at a block cut-off grade of 0.52 g/t Au for oxide, 0.57 g/t Au for transition
      and 0.63 g/t Au for fresh material constrained by a Whittle pit. 

2. Mineral Resources for Adumbi were estimated using a long-term gold price of US$1,600/oz.

3. A minimum mining width of 32 m horizontal was used.

4. A maximum of 4 m internal waste was used.

5. Adumbi bulk densities of 2.45 for oxide, 2.82 for transition and 3.05 for fresh rock were used. For Kitenge and Manzako,
      reference is made to the RPA Technical Report, where bulk densities of 1.7 for oxide, 2.2 for transition and 2.7 for
      sulphide material were used.

6. High gold assays were capped at 18 g/t Au for Adumbi, prior to compositing at 2 m intervals. For Kitenge and
      Manzako, reference is made to the RPA Technical Report where assays were capped at 50 g/t Au, prior to compositing at 2 m intervals.

7. Estimated historical mining has been removed.
8. Numbers might not add up due to rounding.



A total of 84.68% of the Imbo Project mineral resources are attributable to Loncor via its 84.68% interest in the Imbo Project. The resource estimates at Kitenge and Manzako, which were undertaken by RPA in its February 2014 NI 43-101 technical report, have not been reviewed in this study but are based on underground mining scenarios and at a cut-off grade of 2.70 g/t Au. Reference is made to the estimates reported for Kitenge and Manzako in the RPA February 2014 NI 43-101 technical report.

14.15 DISCUSSION

The 17 additional new holes that were completed before the start of the modelling targeted the following:

  • Inferred Resources within the then US$1,500/oz limiting pit shell
  • Plunge and depth extension of the mineralisation
  • Confirming the geometry of the mineralised bodies at depth with increased confidence

Minecon's updated model for this estimate is deeper than the previous model, incorporating additional lower-grade material because of the improved modifying factors and lower breakeven grade and therefore producing a slightly lower grade block cut-off than the previous model. Minecon has completed a full review of the modifying factors used in developing the current estimates and updated them as appropriate based on the new drilling information. It is Minecon's view that the changes in the cost inputs to the modifying factors have limited influence on the estimation of block grades due to the fact that the lower breakeven grade (0.52 g/t Au for oxide, 0.57 g/t Au for transition and 0.63 g/t Au for fresh material), constrained within a US$1,600/oz optimised pit shell, impacted only volume estimation as more lower-grade blocks were captured in this evaluation than in the previous model.

The latest Mineral Resource for the Adumbi deposit represents an increase of 15 %, with increased confidence in the resource as the limiting economic pit shell pushes significantly deeper in the fresh rock. The increased Mineral Resource at Adumbi is mostly in the fresh rock material. Reconciliation work between the previous Minecon model and the current estimate shows that the significant increase in the resources is due to the additional drilling programme intersecting certain additional higher-grade intersections at depth, which has resulted in material being transferred from the unclassified categories within the previous pit into the Inferred Mineral Resource category as well as bringing in material from the down plunge extension to the mineralisation.

In summary, for the Imbo Project, the mineral resources for the Adumbi, Manzako and Kitenge deposits now total 1,883,000 oz of gold (28,185,000 t grading 2.08 g/t Au) in the Indicated category and 2,090,000 oz of gold (22,508,000 t grading 2.89 g/t Au) in the Inferred category, a 15 % increase in the contained gold on the previous resource outlined by Minecon on April, 27, 2021, as well as a conversion of approximately 51.4 % of the Adumbi deposit resource into the higher confidence Indicated Resource category. A total of 84.68 % of the Imbo Project mineral resources are attributable to Loncor via its 84.68 % interest in the Imbo Project. The resource estimates at Kitenge and Manzako, which were undertaken by RPA in its February 2014 NI 43-101 technical report, have not been reviewed in this study and are based on underground mining scenarios and at a cut-off grade of 2.70 g/t Au. Reference is made to the estimates reported for Kitenge and Manzako in the RPA 2014 NI 43-101 technical report.


14.16 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER WORK

There is significant additional resource potential at depth and along the strike extension to the southwest (Canal area) within the Adumbi deposit. Minecon recommends that an expanded drilling programme encompassing over 20 km of the planned infill and deep drilling be undertaken at Adumbi to unearth the full potential of the deposit and to advance the project up the value curve. The main recommendations include but are not limited to the following:

  • At the Adumbi deposit, the gold mineralisation is still open at depth and along strike to the southwest. Minecon proposes that the deep drilling programme be expanded to delineate additional resources to the southwest (Canal area) of the deposit. Furthermore, infill drilling is required to increase the confidence of the Inferred Mineral Resources reported at this deposit into the Indicated and Measured categories.
  • Along trend from Adumbi, the Manzako and Kitenge deposits have Inferred Mineral Resources of 313,000 oz of gold (1.68 Mt grading 5.80 g/t Au) and remain open along strike and at depth. An infill drilling programme of 5,000 m is proposed by Minecon.
  • At a distance of 8 km to 13 km along the structural trend to the southeast across the Imbo river and within the Imbo Project, four prospects (Esio Wapi, Paradis, Museveni and Mungo Iko) have been outlined with soil, rock and trench geochemical sampling with similar host lithologies to those at Adumbi. An initial programme of 2,000 m of scout drilling is recommended on these four prospects to determine their mineral resource potential.
  • Following from the above drilling programmes and with increased confidence in the mineral resources, Minecon recommends that a pre-feasibility study (PFS) be undertaken at Adumbi and other prospects within the Imbo Project. This would include undertaking
  • Further metallurgical test work
  • Open-pit and potential underground mining studies
  • Improved metallurgical plant processing design
  • Power studies
  • Infrastructural studies
  • Economic and financial studies
  • Environmental and social impact study (ESIS)
  • The additional drilling may include close spaced drilling clusters or crosses in three or four parts of the Adumbi deposit to confirm short-scale continuity of the mineralisation and to allow a conditional simulation to be completed if necessary. A total of 24,000 m of drilling (including 7,600 m reverse circulation (RC) drilling and 16,400 m of coring in the mineralised zone) is recommended by Minecon. This would include infill, deep and extension drilling, and further drilling for metallurgical and geotechnical studies.
  • The proposed drilling programme should be undertaken in sequential phases: Priority 1 and 2. All the shallow holes will be undertaken using RC drilling. The deep holes (Priority 1) will be pre-collared with RC drilling and drilled off using core drilling. The Priority 2 holes will include slightly deep and shallow holes. The slightly deep holes will also be pre-collared with RC drilling and tailed off using core drilling while the shallow holes will be drilled by RC.

  • Further studies should be undertaken to assist proper estimations of historical depletions and depletions by recent artisanal mining. This will allow for increased confidence in the estimates of the open cavities. 
  • Compilation of the geological and sampling database into a secure central repository database system and a move away from the storage of files in Microsoft Excel are also recommended. The creation of a central repository will ensure that the data has passed QA/QC validation and has replaced the old data set in the database with the appropriate paper trail to support any changes made.

The recommended infill, extension and deep drilling programme has the potential to significantly increase the Adumbi mineral resource with increased confidence for both open-pit and underground mining scenarios (see Figure 14.24).

Figure 14.24: Adumbi Deposit Long Section with Existing and Recommended Drillholes


15 MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATES

No Mineral Reserves have been estimated for the Imbo Project.

16 ADJACENT PROPERTIES

In addition to the Imbo Project, there have been other mineral exploration activities in the Ngayu Greenstone Belt in recent times, and mineral resources have been defined within the belt. Since 2010, Loncor has been the largest permit holder in the Ngayu belt and has been exploring a number of prospects on its own since 2010 or in joint venture with Barrick Gold Congo SARL (formerly Randgold Resources Congo SARL) (Barrick) from 2016 to 2021 (see Figure 23.1). Rio Tinto had agreements with Loncor and Kilo Goldmines for iron ore in the Ngayu belt since 2010 and undertook initial exploration and some drilling, but terminated these agreements in 2015 due to limited exploration success.

Figure 23.1: Main Gold Projects and Prospects within the Ngayu Greenstone Belt

16.1 NGAYU BELT EXPLORATION (2010 TO 2016)

Loncor commenced its exploration activities in early 2010, and a base camp was established at Yindi. Due to its large landholdings for gold of 4,500 km2 at that time, it was decided to divide the exploration into two concurrent programmes:

  • Assessment of areas of known gold mineralisation (Yindi and Makapela) with the potential to rapidly reach the drilling stage and provide a mineral resource. Soil sampling, augering, rock chip and channel sampling were carried out prior to diamond drilling.

  • Regional programmes aimed at assessing the remainder of the large land package as quickly and cost effectively as possible, in order to identify and prioritise mineralised target areas for follow-up, and enable less-prospective ground to be relinquished with confidence. This programme mainly entailed a regional BLEG survey and detailed interpretation of regional aeromagnetic data, which were carried out under a technology consultation services agreement between Loncor and Newmont (a shareholder in Loncor), which was entered into in February 2011 (but is no longer in place).

During 2012, Loncor undertook more detailed aeromagnetic and radiometric surveys over priority target areas (i.e., Imva Fold area). Grids were established at the Yindi, Makapela, Itali, Matete, Nagasa, Mondarabe, Anguluku and Adumbi West prospects with airborne magnetic and radiometric surveys, geological mapping, stream sediment sampling, soil and rock sampling, trenching, augering, ground geophysical surveys (induced polarisation) and core drilling being undertaken. During the period of 2010 to 2013, Loncor undertook drilling programmes on a number of prospects in the Ngayu belt and outlined mineral resources at Makapela in the west of the belt.

Loncor holds 100 % of the Makapela project. After undertaking soil and channel sampling, a core drilling programme at Makapela was commenced in November 2010 with the objective of testing along strike and at depth the subvertical vein mineralised system being exploited by the artisanal miners at the Main, North and Sele Sele pits, which returned significant results from soil and channel sampling. Drill results at Makapela were announced by Loncor via a number of press releases in 2011 and 2012. Significant drill intersections included 7.19 m grading 64 g/t Au, 4.28 m at 32.6 g/t Au, 3.47 m grading 24.9 g/t Au, 4.09 m at 21.7 g/t Au and 4.35 m grading 17.5 g/t Au.

After conducting preliminary metallurgical test work in May 2012, Loncor announced a maiden mineral resource estimate for Loncor's Makapela prospect of 4.10 Mt grading 7.59 g/t Au (using a 2.75 g/t Au cut-off) for an Inferred Mineral Resource of 1.0 Moz of gold to a maximum vertical depth of 500 m below surface with gold mineralisation open at depth. The resource was updated in April 2013 when Loncor announced updated mineral resource estimates for Loncor's Makapela prospect of an Indicated Mineral Resource of 0.61 Moz of gold (2.20 Mt grading at 8.66 g/t Au) and an Inferred Mineral Resource of 0.55 Moz of gold (3.22 Mt grading at 5.30 g/t Au).

A total of 56 core holes (18,091 m) were completed in the vicinity of the Main and North pits, and 15 holes (3,594 m) were drilled at Sele Sele. In addition to the above resource drilling programme, a total of 12 holes (1,560 m) were drilled to locate potential extensions to the known reefs and new mineralised structures indicated by soil, rock chip and auger sampling. Several units of BIF are interlayered within basalts and range up to 13 m in thickness, although the width is generally less than 6 m. Quartz porphyry and quartz-feldspar porphyry dykes and sills are also present. In the vicinity of the mineralised zones, the intrusive units are generally no more than a few metres in width.


Three styles of gold mineralisation are present at Makapela:

  • The first style contains quartz veins emplaced into shear zones within the basalt sequence. The best developed and economically significant vein (Reef 1) is exploited in the Main pit and consists of white quartz with irregularly distributed pyrite. Visible gold is quite common, occurring in 28 % of the intersections as isolated specks and small aggregates up to 2 mm across. Reef 1 has been intersected over a strike length of 480 m and to a vertical depth of 480 m, and dips to the WNW at 80° to 90°. It has an average true width of 2.15 m grading at 11.15 g/t Au. A characteristic of Reef 1 is the good geological continuity between drill sections. Although the width and grade are variable, the vein was present in almost all the holes, approximately in the expected position. The basalt-hosting Reef 1 shows intense hydrothermal alteration for several metres into the hanging wall and footwall.
  • A second style contains strike-parallel mineralisation up to 6 m in width, which is closely associated with shearing within and on the margins of narrow BIF units. The most important zone (Reef 2) is exploited in the North pit. Visible gold is much less common than in Reef 1, occurring in 5 % of the intersections. Mineralisation in the Sele Sele pit, 2 km NNE of the North pit, has similar characteristics to those of Reef 2, and is interpreted to be on the same BIF unit. However, the Sele Sele zone is generally wider and of a lower grade than the North pit area, with the best intersection drilled being 15.68 m at 5.35 g/t Au. The mineralisation plunges to the SSE at approximately 40°.
  • A third area of the Reef 2 style mineralisation occurs in the Bamako area where channel sampling returned an intersection of 4.60 m at 11.42 g/t Au. The mineralisation is associated with a 2 km long soil anomaly, and although the best intersection from preliminary drilling was of relatively low grade (3.60 m at 4.43 g/t Au), further work is warranted.

The deposit at Makapela is open down plunge, creating the prospect of drilling to below the current 500 m depth to extend the resources as well as potentially exploring for additional resources between the main target areas delineated and further along the regional structure. Loncor also considers it unlikely that all the mineralised bodies are outcropping, and a good potential exists for locating blind mineralised shoots along well-defined structures with an aggregate strike of over 5 km. Loncor is currently undertaking a feasibility study at Makapela as part of converting Makapela's exploration permit into an exploitation permit.

Besides Makapela, Loncor drilled other prospects during this period, and significant intersections were obtained at Yindi (21.3 m grading 3.3 g/t Au, 24.0 m grading 1.5 g/t Au and 10.3 m grading 4.1 g/t Au) and at Itali (38.82 m at 2.66 g/t Au, 14.70 m at 1.68 g/t Au and 3.95 m at 19.5 g/t Au)

At the end of 2013, due to a significant drop in the gold price, exploration was reduced, and no further drilling was undertaken at Ngayu.

16.2 NGAYU EXPLORATION (2016 TO 2021)

In January 2016, Loncor entered into a joint venture agreement with Barrick. This agreement provided for a joint venture (Joint Venture) between Loncor and Barrick with respect to exploration permits held by Loncor now covering 1,894 km2 of ground in the Ngayu belt and excluding certain parcels of land surrounding and including the Makapela and Yindi projects, which were retained by Loncor and did not form part of the Joint Venture (the Imbo Project is also not part of the Joint Venture). Under the joint venture agreement, Barrick managed and funded all exploration of the permit areas until the completion of a pre-feasibility study on any gold discovery meeting Barrick's investment criteria. Once the Joint Venture determined to move ahead with a full feasibility study, a special purpose vehicle (SPV) would be created to hold the specific discovery areas. Subject to the DRC's free carried interest requirements, Barrick would retain 65 % of the SPV with Loncor holding the balance of 35 %. Loncor would be required, from that point forward, to fund its pro-rata share of the SPV in order to maintain its 35 % interest or be diluted.


In January 2017, Loncor announced preliminary results of the geophysical airborne survey undertaken by Randgold as part of its Joint Venture with Loncor (it is noted that Randgold and Barrick merged under Barrick's name in early 2019). A 10,013 line-kilometre helicopter-borne electromagnetic VTEM (versatile time domain electromagnetic) survey (JV Survey) was completed over the Ngayu belt. The JV Survey provided a valuable additional layer of geological information through mapping the conductivity nature of the belt. The new data assisted with resolving the lithological nature of the belt as well as assisting in identifying major structures and areas of structural complexity.

During 2020, the Barrick-Loncor joint venture ground increased to approximately 2,000 km2 with additional exploration permits and exploitation licences controlled by Loncor, as well as certain exploration permits held by Barrick, ceded into the Joint Venture.

By June 2020, several priority targets had been outlined by Barrick, including Anguluku, Bakpau, Medere (Itali), Mokepa and Yambenda, and two portable core rigs commenced scout drilling on these targets (see Figure 23.1). By May 2021, Barrick had completed 27 core holes (3,844 m) on several targets in the Ngayu belt, including Anguluku, Medere (Itali), Medere, Mokepa and Yambenda (see Figure 23.1). At Yambenda, four drill sections tested a 3.6 km portion of the 9.5 km long anomalous soil corridor. All the holes intersected mineralisation associated with WNW shear structures developed as a contact zone between BIF and volcano-sediments, including conglomerates (similar host rock assemblage found at Kibali mine). The best drill intercepts included 14 m grading 0.85 g/t Au in YBDD0001, 49 m grading 0.52 g/t Au and 14.5 m grading 1.38 g/t Au in YBDD0002, and 35.05 m at 0.60 g/t Au in YBDD0006. At Mokepa, six scout holes were drilled, with the best holes assaying 19 m grading 1.04 g/t Au in borehole ADDD0001 and 46.7 m grading 1.32 g/t Au in hole ADDD0002.

In May 2021, Barrick informed Loncor that it would not be continuing exploration on the Joint Venture ground. Loncor is assessing the results of the Joint Venture programme. In particular, the Mongaliema and Mokepa prospects, which are close to Makapela, are planned to be further investigated by Loncor. At Mongaliema, the target area is a west-northwest trending shear zone hosted within altered metasediments with cherty units near the contact of a dolerite intrusive. Pitting has demonstrated that much of the area is covered by thick transported cover which hinders near-surface exploration. Pitting was undertaken to the southwest of the trench, which graded 32 m at 1.37 g/t Au. Results from pits in excess of 5 m deep confirmed the southwestern extension beneath thick transported alluvial material, with an average high grade of 18.13 g/t Au from 11 samples. Further work is warranted from the results received to date at Mongaliema. Mongaliema will be evaluated to determine whether it has the resource potential to be combined with the nearby Makapela deposit. 


In terms of producing gold mines, the Kibali Gold Mine, approximately 220 km northeast by air from the Imbo Project, is located within the Archean aged Moto greenstone belt and commenced gold production in September 2013. The mine is owned by Kibali Goldmines SA (Kibali), which is a joint venture company with 45 % owned by Barrick Gold, 45 % by AngloGold Ashanti, and 10 % by Société Minière de Kilo-Moto (SOKIMO). Barrick is the operator and in 2020, Kibali produced 808,134 oz of gold at an AISC of US$778/oz of gold. The mine is an open-pit and underground operation, and in 2020, 7.62 Mt of ore was processed at an average grade of 3.6 g/t gold and a metallurgical recovery of 90 %. Kibali had Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources of 15.5 Moz of gold, Inferred Mineral Resources of 1.5 Moz and Proven and Probable ore reserves at the end of 2020 of 9.33 Moz (from Barrick Gold 2020 Annual Report).


17 OTHER RELEVANT DATA AND INFORMATION

The DRC covers 2,344,858 km2 of land in the centre of Africa, making it the twelfth largest country in the world, approximately two-thirds the size of Western Europe. With an estimated population of 89.50 million (2020), DRC is the fourth most populous country in Africa. Approximately 45 % of the population lives in cities, and the capital Kinshasa is by far the largest, with approximately 15 million inhabitants (2020). DRC has approximately 200 ethnic identities with approximately 45 % of the population belonging to the Kongo, Luba, Mongo and Mangbetu-Azande groups.

17.1 DRC POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC CLIMATE

The Belgian Congo gained independence from Belgium in June 1960. In 1971, the country was renamed Zaire. Following a rebellion started in mid-1996, President Mobutu Sese Seko was toppled in May 1997 by Laurent Désiré Kabila after 32 years of power and Zaire was renamed the Democratic Republic of the Congo. In 1998, a civil war broke out with the east and north of the country controlled by rebel factions allegedly supported by Rwanda and Uganda. In January 2001, Laurent Kabila was assassinated and succeeded by his son, Joseph Kabila. Whereas Laurent Kabila had a conflicted relationship with the international community, Joseph Kabila re-established various engagements and commenced overtures for peace. In June 2003, a formal peace agreement was signed and the country reunited through a transition government. In 2006, the first multi-party elections in 40 years were held, with Joseph Kabila winning the second voting round. Elections were held again in 2011 won by Joseph Kabila and in 2018 where Joseph Kabila was replaced by Felix Antoine Tshisekedi Tshilombo in a contested election.

The country is divided into 26 provinces, each with a governor and provincial parliament. The national parliament consists of a lower house where representatives are directly elected from the provinces, and a senate with members voted by provincial parliaments. The country is by and large unified and at peace. The east remains troubled by local ethnic rebellions which have little popular support. The main rebel group, the 23rd of March Movement (M23), consisted of army defectors grouped around leaders from the Kivu region bordering Rwanda, accused by the international community of supporting this group. The goals of M23 were unclear but were ostensibly motivated by control of natural resources in the area they occupy. In early November 2013, the M23 rebels were defeated by the Congolese army with support of a United Nations brigade consisting of soldiers from Tanzania and South Africa. The rebel group thereafter dissolved itself and said it was ready to disarm, demobilise and integrate into the Congolese army. Since the 1990s, the Allied Democratic Forces (ADF), an Islamic rebel group from Uganda, has operated in northeastern DRC and has been blamed for numerous civilian massacres and attacks against DRC security forces, triggering flights of refugees inside the DRC and across the border into neighbouring countries. Other smaller rebel groups are also present in the east, but have no popular support, and appear to have only guiding control of trade and commerce in areas they are established. Due to the country's lack of infrastructure, these groups remain fairly isolated. In April 2021, the government of the DRC declared a state of siege over the provinces of North Kivu and Ituri in an effort to end insecurity and restore peace in Eastern DRC. Lieutenant General Johnny N'Kashama Luboya was appointed governor of Ituri to oversee these operations.


Following the peace accords of 2003, the international community embarked on significant economic investment programmes via various bilateral and multilateral agreements, such as with the World Bank, the European Union (EU), and various other international institutions and individual countries. China in particular has committed significant funds and has undertaken various large infrastructure projects mostly focused on rehabilitation of the road network.

Since 2003, the United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the DRC (MONUSCO) has been addressing the threat posed by armed groups and advancing peace and stability in the DRC. The UN Security Council resolution 2502 (December 2019) authorised a troop ceiling of 14,000 military personnel to be stationed throughout the country, mostly in the east. Although its mandate is mostly for monitoring the stability of the country, MONUSCO was authorised by the UN Security Council in June 2013 to be reinforced by a brigade with a mandate under Chapter Seven to actively neutralise rebel groups. This brigade was mainly constituted of troops from Tanzania and South Africa. A major UN base is located in the city of Beni (North Kivu province).

With the installation of a transitional government in 2003 after peace accords, economic conditions slowly began to improve as the government reopened relations with international financial institutions and international donors, and the DRC government began implementing reforms. The country's GDP growth averaged 6 % from 2005 to 2017 while the inflation rate has averaged 17 % for the same period with a remarkable inflation rate of 1 % between 2012 and 2015. After reaching 5.8 % in 2018, economic growth slowed to 4.4 % in 2019, owing to the decline in commodity prices, particularly for cobalt and copper, which account for over 80 % of the country's exports. In 2020, the DRC experienced its first recession in 18 years as a result of the adverse impacts of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) across the world. The DRC's real GDP contracted by 1.7 % in 2020 after increasing by 4.4 % in 2019, stemming from mobility restriction, constrained government spending, and weaker exports caused by the global economic downturn.

The banking sector has been reinforced over the past 15 years with a host of international banks, mostly of African origin, having established operations. There are currently 18 commercial banks in the DRC. The official currency is the Congolese franc, although approximately 90 % of banking deposits and lending are in US dollars, and the prices of some goods, services and financial activities are indexed to the US dollar. More progress is needed in developing banking payment systems and in facilitating the use of financial activities.

Communications have vastly improved, with several major multinational networks having established themselves in the DRC, and growth in the international aviation network attests to growing investment in the country. Mining, agriculture, telecommunications, and manufacturing are steadily growing and developing.

17.2 DRC COMMUNITY AND SOCIAL ASPECTS

Socio-economic conditions in the DRC are still profoundly affected by the years of conflict in the country. Much of the DRC's population continues to live on a subsistence basis, primarily from cultivation of crops such as cassava, or fishing and hunting. Health and education services are poor or non-existent in many areas, although steady investment and assistance through various international organisations and non-government organisations (NGOs) are slowly improving the situation in some areas. Although much of the country is still agrarian, various urban centres are being revitalised via domestic and foreign investments and offer professional opportunities. A growing number of the Congolese Diaspora are returning to the DRC to pursue opportunities deemed to be more lucrative than in their adopted countries.


17.3 STATUS OF THE DRC MINERALS INDUSTRY

The DRC has historically been a significant minerals producer, mostly of gold, diamonds, copper, cobalt, and tin. The industry was started by private investments during the colonial period from 1885 to 1960, resulting in some very large industrial mining complexes which established entire towns through the country such as Mbjui Mayi, Lubumbashi, Kolwezi, Likasi, and others.

After independence, many of the large mining operations were nationalised and suffered from mismanagement and lack of reinvestment, such has been the case of Gecamines (focused on copper and cobalt in the Haut Katanga and Lualaba provinces), Okimo (focused on gold in Ituri, Haut Uélé and Tshopo Provinces), Sakima (focused on tin in South Kivu, North Kivu and Maniema provinces), and others. Production in these parastatal mining corporations collapsed and by the late 1990s was virtually non-existent.

In 2002, the DRC adopted a new mining law (the "2002 Mining Code"), whose redaction was sponsored by the World Bank. In March 2018, the 2002 Mining Code was amended and a new mining law was enacted (the "2018 Mining Code"). Along with the 2003 peace agreement, the 2002 Mining Code became a catalyst for a massive influx of mining and exploration capital into the country, with an estimated eight billion dollars having been invested since 2004. Much of this capital was focused on joint ventures with Gecamines in the Katanga region, but other provinces also saw significant investments. In 2019, the DRC became the world's fourth largest copper producer, on a par with the United States of America and behind China, Peru and Chile. The world's highest-grade copper deposit, Kamoa-Kakula, achieved full production in 2021 by Ivanhoe Mines and Zijin Mining Group in the Katanga province. The DRC is also by far the world's largest producer of cobalt, accounting for roughly 60 % of global production. The DRC is also now a significant tin producer with the world's highest-grade tin mine at Mpama North in North Kivu Province being brought into production by Alphamin Resources in 2020.

In the Haut Uélé province, the Kibali deposit, discovered in 2003 and having achieved first production in September 2013, has since been developed into one of the world's largest gold mines and a significant catalyst for further exploration and development in the province. In 2019 and 2020, the Kibali mine (managed by Barrick Gold Corporation) produced a record 814,027 oz and 808,134 oz of gold, respectively, demonstrating the ability to successfully develop and operate a modern top-tier gold mine in one of the world's most remote and infrastructurally under-endowed regions. The Kibali mine, which is approximately 220 km from Loncor's Adumbi deposit, is now Africa's largest gold producer.


17.4 DRC MINERALS INDUSTRY POLICIES

Approximately 10 years after the DRC 2002 Mining Code was originally adopted, a revision process, which started in 2012, led to a bill that was finally approved by both houses in January 2018 and signed into law in March 2018.

A summary of the key changes introduced by the 2018 Mining Code is given below.

17.4.1 Available Mining Rights

Mining rights available under the 2018 Mining Code include the following:

  • An exploration permit (PR), standardised to all minerals and granted for five years, renewable once for the same term
  • A mining permit (PE), granted for 25 years, renewable for periods of up to 15 years

These mining rights can now only be granted to legal entities and not to natural persons.

17.4.2 Royalties and Taxes

An increase in royalties and taxes was among the principal innovations of the 2018 Mining Code, which include the following:

  • Royalty rates increased from 2 % to 3.5 % for non-ferrous and base metals and from 2.5 % to 3.5 % for precious metals, while precious stones royalties increased from 4 % to 6 % and are calculated on the gross market value of the products.
  • A special 10 % royalty was created on minerals deemed by the State to be "strategic substances", defined as minerals which, on the basis of the State's opinion of the prevailing economic environment, were of special interest given the critical nature of such mineral and the geo-strategical context. It is anticipated that the list would include cobalt, coltan, lithium and germanium, which have become leading mining commodities with the increased demand for electric vehicles and grid storage technology. DRC is a major global producer of these substances.
  • While corporate income tax remained at a reduced rate of 30 % for mining companies, a new "super profits" tax of 50 % was created on excess profits, defined as profits made when a commodity exceeds by 25 % the price used in the bankable feasibility study.
  • The holder of a PE (or a PR) in the DRC is subject to a tax on the surface area of the PE (PR) payable in Congolese francs at a rate equivalent to US$0.40/ha for the first year (US$0.20/ha for PRs); US$0.60/ha for the second year (US$0.30/ha for PRs); US$0.70/ha for the third year (US$0.35/ha for PRs); and US$0.80/ha for each subsequent year (US$0.40/ha for PRs).
  • In addition to the surface area tax, the holders of a PE are subject to an annual area rights tax of the equivalent in Congolese francs of US$588.96/m2.The annual area rights tax for the holder of a PR is as follows: US$3.53/ha for the first two years; US$36.52/ha for each year following the first two years, and US$60.04/ha for every year of renewal of the PR.

17.4.3 Contracting Requirements

The 2018 Mining Code requires mining companies to comply with Local Law 17/001 of February 2017, requiring contractors to be Congolese and contracting companies to be owned by Congolese shareholders. While unclear, it is generally accepted that this means the Congolese contractor's company must be majority owned by Congolese shareholders. Furthermore, in concluding services contracts for mining activities (not including contracts for the sale of goods), priority must also be given to Congolese companies. In this regard, any services contracts concluded with a foreign company are subject to a 14 % tax on amounts paid under such contract.

17.4.4 Other Notable Amendments

Other notable amendments are as follows:

  • The State's free-carried shareholding in the mining company was increased from 5 % to 10 %, increased by 5 % each time the permit is renewed. Furthermore, at least 10 % of the capital must be owned by Congolese citizens, which is a development that has attracted industry concern.
  • The exportation of raw minerals was forbidden, and mining permit holders must now present a plan for the refinement of their minerals to the mining authorities. A one-year derogation may be obtained if a company shows that it is impossible to transform the minerals locally.
  • The requirements relating to State approvals for transfers, farm-outs and option contracts were expanded, including a new requirement that changes of control (including certain share transfers) in companies holding a mining permit are subject to State approval.
  • Access to a documented state-studied deposit, secured by tender, will be subject to the payment to the State of an entry fee amounting to 1 % of the price paid for the tendered deposit.
  • The stability period during which taxes and customs cannot be modified was reduced from 10 to 5 years. While existing mining rights are subject to the provisions of the new law, it is unclear to what extent existing mining agreements with stabilisation provisions will be affected.
  • Companies must now establish a provision of 0.5 % of turnover for mine rehabilitation.

17.5 DRC POLITICAL RISK

The following is taken from Loncor's 2020 Annual Report on Form 20-F publicly filed by Loncor on SEDAR and EDGAR.

Loncor's projects are located in the DRC. Loncor's assets and operations are therefore subject to various political, economic and other uncertainties, including, among other things, the risks of war and civil unrest, hostage taking, expropriation, nationalisation, renegotiation or nullification of existing licences, permits, approvals and contracts, taxation policies, foreign exchange and repatriation restrictions, changing political conditions, international monetary fluctuations, currency controls and foreign governmental regulations that favour or require the awarding of contracts to local contractors or require foreign contractors to employ citizens of, or purchase supplies from, a particular jurisdiction. Changes, if any, in mining or investment policies or shifts in political climate in the DRC may adversely affect Loncor's operations or profitability. Operations may be affected in varying degrees by government regulations with respect to, but not limited to, restrictions on production, price controls, export controls, currency remittance, income taxes, foreign investment, maintenance of claims, environmental legislation, land use, land claims of local people, water use and mine safety. Failure to comply strictly with applicable laws, regulations and local practices relating to mineral rights could result in loss, reduction or expropriation of entitlements. In addition, in the event of a dispute arising from operations in the DRC, Loncor may be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of foreign courts or may not be successful in subjecting foreign persons to the jurisdiction of courts in Canada. Loncor also may be hindered or prevented from enforcing its rights with respect to a governmental instrumentality because of the doctrine of sovereign immunity. It is not possible for Loncor to accurately predict such developments or changes in laws or policy or to what extent any such developments or changes may have a material adverse effect on Loncor's operations. Should Loncor's rights or its titles not be honoured or become unenforceable for any reason, or if any material term of these agreements is arbitrarily changed by the government of the DRC, Loncor's business, financial condition and prospects will be materially adversely affected.


Some or all of Loncor's properties are located in regions where political instability and violence are ongoing. Some or all of Loncor's properties are inhabited by artisanal miners. These conditions may interfere with work on Loncor's properties and present a potential security threat to Loncor's employees. There is a risk that activities at Loncor's properties may be delayed or interfered with, due to the conditions of political instability, violence, hostage taking or the inhabitation of the properties by artisanal miners. Loncor uses its best efforts to maintain good relations with the local communities in order to minimise such risks.

The DRC is a developing nation emerging from a period of civil war and conflict. Physical and institutional infrastructure throughout the DRC is in a debilitated condition. The DRC is in transition from a largely state-controlled economy to one based on free market principles, and from a non-democratic political system with a centralised ethnic power base, to one based on more democratic principles. There can be no assurance that these changes will be effected or that the achievement of these objectives will not have material adverse consequences for Loncor and its operations. The DRC continues to experience instability in parts of the country due to certain militia and criminal elements. While the government and United Nations forces are working to support the extension of central government authority throughout the country, there can be no assurance that such efforts will be successful.

No assurance can be given that Loncor will be able to maintain effective security in connection with its assets or personnel in the DRC where civil war and conflict have disrupted exploration and mining activities in the past and may affect Loncor's operations or plans in the future.

HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases represent a serious threat to maintaining a skilled workforce in the mining industry in the DRC. HIV/AIDS is a major healthcare challenge faced by Loncor's operations in the country. There can be no assurance that Loncor will not lose members of its workforce or workforce man-hours or incur increased medical costs, which may have a material adverse effect on Loncor's operations.

The DRC has historically experienced relatively high rates of inflation.


18 INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS

18.1 INTRODUCTION

The Qualified Persons (QPs) note the following interpretations and conclusions based on the review of the information available for this technical report.

18.2 GEOLOGY AND MINERALISATION

The Imbo Project is found within the Ngayu Archean greenstone belt, one of a number of Archean-aged, granite-greenstone belts that extend from northern Tanzania, into northeastern DRC and then into the Central African Republic. These gold belts contain a number of major gold mines including Kibali (DRC) and Geita, North Mara and Bulyanhulu (Tanzania). Gold deposits within these belts are associated with the globally important Neo-Archean orogenic gold deposits, examples of which are found in most Neo-Archean cratons around the world.

Gold mineralisation in these greenstone belts is commonly of the fracture and vein type in brittle fracture to ductile dislocation zones. At the Adumbi deposit, the gold mineralisation is generally associated with quartz and quartz-carbonate-pyrite ± pyrrhotite ± arsenopyrite veins in a BIF unit. Examples of similar type BIF hosted gold deposits to Adumbi include the major Geita mine in Tanzania and Kibali mine in northeastern DRC.

Most of the gold occurrences within the Ngayu belt are located within or close to the contact of the BIF. Historically, only two deposits were exploited on any significant scale, Yindi and Adumbi, where gold mineralisation is found within the BIF units. Artisanal mining of weathered gold mineralisation preserved as alluvial, eluvial or colluvial material is widespread throughout the Ngayu belt. Within the Imbo Project area in the eastern part of the Ngayu belt, there is a strong association between gold mineralisation and the presence of the BIF, the BIF either constituting the host rock (e.g., Adumbi and Yindi) or forming a significant part of the local stratigraphy. The BIF forms favourable physical and chemical traps for mineralising hydrothermal fluids. Besides Adumbi, there are a number of smaller gold deposits (Kitenge and Manzako) and prospects within the Imbo Project.

18.3 EXPLORATION, DRILLING AND ANALYTICAL DATA COLLECTION IN SUPPORT OF MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATION

Systematic exploration has been conducted on the Adumbi deposit and Imbo Project area, including airborne LiDAR and geophysical surveys, gridding, geological mapping, soil, trench, adit and auger sampling together with a number of core drilling programmes. Sampling, sample storage, security, sample preparation and geochemical analyses and verification are considered appropriate for the resource estimate at Adumbi.

18.4 MINERAL RESOURCE METHODOLOGY AND ESTIMATION

The mineral resource estimate for Adumbi has been undertaken according to the requirements of S-K 1300 and NI 43-101. The data used for the resource estimate and methods employed are considered reasonable for the level of study for this Technical Report.


18.5 METALLURGICAL TEST WORK

For the Adumbi deposit, representative core sample composites were selected for metallurgical test work from a range of depths and along strike and for the various mineralised host lithologies and styles of mineralisation. These representative samples were then submitted to an independent metallurgical laboratory for diagnostic test work to determine metallurgical recovery estimates using appropriate processing routes. The metallurgical test work undertaken is considered appropriate for the level of this study.

18.6 OPEN-PIT OPTIMISATION AND MINERAL INVENTORY

The Mineral Inventory Statement undertaken on the Adumbi deposit is reported in accordance with S-K 1300 and NI 43-101 requirements. The Adumbi Mineral Inventory for the various material types (oxide, transition and fresh) contained within the Adumbi practical pit designs consists of 1.883 Moz (28.185 Mt grading 2.08 g/t Au) of Indicated mineral resources and 1.777 Moz (20.828 Mt grading 2.65 g/t Au) of Inferred mineral resources.

Pit optimisation assumptions and parameters used to constrain the depth extent of the geological model to generate the mineral inventory of the open pit for the Adumbi deposit are considered appropriate for its location and infrastructural setting with appropriate metallurgical recoveries used from the test work and a gold price of US$1,600/oz, which is below current levels.

In the QP's opinion, the parameters used in the Mineral Resource to Mineral Inventory conversion process are reasonable.

18.7 POSSIBLE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES TO THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF ADUMBI

Considering Adumbi is at an early stage of development, with PFS and FS required before the project can advance to the development stage, a number of risks have been outlined below:

  • Risks to the resource estimate resulting from future drilling
  • Risks related to the interpretations of mineralisation geometry and continuity in the mineralised zones
  • Future metallurgical test work yielding results that vary from the current test work undertaken with lower metallurgical recoveries
  • Delays in progressing the project due to security problems

The future economic study will aim to reduce the risks and uncertainties associated with future development of Adumbi.


19 RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the positive results of the updated Mineral Resource, further work is warranted at Adumbi to advance the project up the value curve by completing follow-up work on the project. A number of opportunities have been identified to increase the mineral resources and enhance and increase the economics and financial returns at Adumbi. It is recommended that Loncor follow up on these opportunities, which include the following:

  • Increasing and Upgrading Mineral Resources at Adumbi and within the Imbo Project

There is excellent exploration potential to further increase the mineral resources at Adumbi and within the Imbo Project. At Adumbi, the mineralised BIF host sequence increases in thickness below the open-pit shell, and wide-spaced drilling has already intersected grades and thicknesses amenable to underground mining. Further drilling is required to initially outline a significant underground Inferred Mineral Resource which can then be combined with the open-pit mineral resource so that studies can be undertaken for a combined open-pit and underground mining scenario at Adumbi. It is also recommended that infill drilling be undertaken in the deeper part of the open-pit shell to upgrade the current Inferred resources into the Indicated category.

Minecon recommends that any deep boreholes at Adumbi be initially drilled and cased by a reverse circulation (RC) rig and followed up in the mineralised zone with a core rig. This drilling procedure should reduce the metreage unit costs and time to complete the drilling at Adumbi.

Besides increasing the resource base, a combined open pit/underground project could increase grade throughput and reduce strip ratios with the higher grade, deeper mineral resources being mined more economically by underground mining methods, which could increase annual gold production and drive down operating costs. Minecon also recommends that further studies should be undertaken to assist in estimating historical depletions and depletions by recent artisanal mining.

Additional deposits and prospects occur close to Adumbi and have the potential to add mineral resources and feed to the Adumbi operation. Along trend from Adumbi, the Manzako and Kitenge deposits have Inferred Mineral Resources of 303,000 oz of gold (1.68 Mt grading 5.80 g/t Au) and remain open along strike and at depth. Further drilling is warranted on these two deposits.

Along the structural trend, 8 km to 13 km to the southeast across the Imbo River and within the Imbo Project, four prospects (Esio Wapi, Paradis, Museveni and Mungo Iko) with similar host lithologies to Adumbi have been outlined with soil, rock and trench geochemical sampling. An initial shallow scout drilling programme should be undertaken on these four prospects to determine their mineral resource potential.

A total of 24,000 m of drilling (including 7,600 m RC drilling and 16,400 m of coring in the mineralised zone) is recommended by Minecon. This would include infill, deep and extension drilling. The proposed drilling programme should be undertaken in two sequential phases:


  • Phase 1: Deep holes outside the pit outline will be pre-collared with RC drilling and completed in the mineralised zone using core drilling.
  • Phase 2. Infill, moderately deep and shallow holes within the pit outline will be drilled, with the deeper holes pre-collared with RC drilling and tailed off using core drilling while the shallow holes are drilled by RC.
  • Additional Mineral Resources within the Ngayu Greenstone Belt

Additional feed for the Adumbi processing plant could also come from Loncor's 100 % owned high-grade Makapela deposit, where Indicated Mineral Resources of 2.20 Mt grading 8.66 g/t Au (614,200 oz of gold) and Inferred Mineral Resources of 3.22 Mt grading 5.30 g/t Au (549,600 oz of gold) have been outlined to date, with the high-grade material being able to be transported economically to Adumbi.

  • Additional geotechnical investigations:
  • Additional geotechnical investigations including drilling are recommended to optimise and potentially steepen pit slopes especially for the competent fresh BIF host rock which could reduce the strip ratio and thereby lower mining costs at Adumbi.
  • An in-depth analysis of the waste rock should be conducted to ascertain whether it can be utilised for construction of the TSF embankment.
  • Further metallurgical test work:
  • Additional metallurgical test work, including additional flotation and petrographic studies, is recommended to confirm recoveries

Minecon estimates that the recommended drilling and other studies will cost approximately US$17.551 million and take 12 months to complete. As part of this work plan, it is recommended that a PFS be undertaken to outline updated mineral resources and ore reserves. The recommended scope and budget are detailed in Table 26.1.

Table 26.1: Proposed Budget for Follow-Up Work on the Adumbi Deposit and Imbo Project

Description

Amount (US$)

Adumbi drilling to outline Inferred Resources below pit shell (10 boreholes totalling 7,400 m DD and 2,600 m RC)

2,716,000

Adumbi drilling within pit shell to upgrade Inferred Resources into the Indicated category (51 drillholes totalling 6,600 m DD and 6,400 m RC)

3,972,000

Imbo East scout drilling on four prospects (1,600 m - 12 boreholes)

360,000

Sample preparation and geochemical analysis

740,000

Metallurgical test work and petrographic studies

510,000

Monitoring of water levels at Ngayu and Imbo rivers

180 000

Modelling Mineral Resource/Reserve Estimation

175,000




Description

Amount (US$)

Geotechnical drilling

100,000

Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) - PFS Level

390,000

Independent engineering Studies -PFS

500,000

Salaries and wages

2,404,000

Management fees

360,000

Camp support (security, travel, camp, communications, vehicle, etc.)

3,378,000

Capital equipment

171,000

Subtotal

15,956,000

Contingency (10 %)

1,595,000

Total

17,551,000



20 REFERENCES

Analytical Solutions Ltd, 2013. Imbo Project, DRC Soil Geochemistry, Prepared on behalf of Kilo Goldmines Ltd., October 2013.

AngloGold Ashanti Limited, 2013. 2012 Annual Integrated Report, March 19, 2013.

Arizi, Dr N., Smith, Dr A. L. and Prof Muya Wa Bitanko, D., 2010. Mongbwalu Cultural Heritage Specialist Study. Report Prepared for Ashanti Goldfields Kilo S.A.R.L. September 2010.

Banro Corporation, 2013. Twangiza Project, available at http://www.banro.com/s/Twangiza.
asp?ReportID=307249, accessed October 28, 2013.

BHP-UTAH Minerals International, 1989. Report on Kitenge-Adumbi and Yindi. Internal unpublished report, January 1989.

BRGM, 1982. Report on Kitenge-Adumbi 1982 Mission, Republic of Zaire, Report of the Bureau of Geological and Mineral Research. No. 81 KIN 002, 1982.

Browne S.E.; Fairhead J.D. ,1983. Gravity Study of the Central African Rift System: A Model of Continental Disruption: 1. The Ngaoundere and ABU Gabra Rifts In: P. Morgan and B.H. Baker (Editors), Processes of Continental Rifting. Tectonophysics, 94: 187-203.

Bugeco, 1988. Gold potential in the Ngayu Mining District Haut Zaire; the Adumbi and Yindi Old Mines. Unpublished report prepared for ZAFRIMINES, August 1988.

Deblond, A., and Tack, L., 2000. Updated Geological Framework of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) in Central Africa. Unpublished draft of the Royal Museum for Central Africa (Tevuren) Brussels, 2000.

Hewson, N., March 2012. Adumbi Underground Mapping Report (internal Kilo report) dated March 2012.

Kilo Goldmines, 2013. Geographical Background Data, Internal Reports, November 2013.

Kilo Goldmines, 2013- 2017. Internal Monthly Reports, from 2014 to 2017.

Minecon Resources and Services Limited, 2020. Independent NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Imbo Project, Ituri Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Effective Date: April 17, 2020.

Minecon Resources and Services Limited, 2021. Updated Resource Statement and Independent NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Imbo Project, Ituri Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Effective Date: April 27, 2021.

Mwana Africa, 2013. Press Release October 2, 2013 Zani-Kodo Project. Retrieved from: http://www.mwanaafrica.com/investors-and-media/latest-news.

Randgold Resources Limited, 2011. Randgold BMO February 2011 Presentation, http://www.randgoldresources.com/randgold/action/media/downloadFile?media_fileid- 6939.


Randgold Resources Limited, 2018. Technical Report on the Kibali Gold Mine, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Report for NI 43-101, Effective Date: December 31, 2017.

Roscoe Postle Associates Inc. February 28, 2014. Technical Report on the Somituri Project Imbo Licence, Democratic Republic of the Congo; NI 43-101 Report. Effective Date: December 31, 2013.

Royal Museum for Central Africa (RMCA), 2007. Contribution to Adumbi - Kitenge Project (République Démocratic du Congo). Unpublished report prepared for Kilo Goldmines Ltd by The Royal Museum for Central Africa, Department of Geology and Mineralogy, Leuvensesteenweg, 13, B-3080-

SENET, 2009. Twangiza Gold Project: Updated Feasibility Study, NI 43-101 Technical Report. South Kivu Province, Democratic Republic of Congo. Report produced for Banro Corporation. July 2009.

SRK, 2011. Mongbwalu Project: Final Environmental Impact Study and Management Plan of the Project. Volume 1: EIS and EMPP Report. Report produced for Ashanti Goldfields Kilo S.A.R.L. December 2011.

SRK, 2012. Namoya Gold Project: Resettlement Action Plan. Maneima Province, Democratic Republic of Congo. Report produced for Banro Corporation. November 2012.

Tervuren, March 2007. Schlüter, T, 2006. Geological Atlas of Africa - Second Edition. Springer Berlin, January 2008.

The Mineral Corporation, 2012. Updated Mineral Resource Estimate of the Adumbi Prospect, Orientale Province, Democratic Republic of Congo, No C-KIL-ADU-1071-775, filed on SEDAR/available at www.sedar.com April 2012 as amended 8 February 8, 2013.

Vancouver Petrographics Ltd, 2013. Report No. 120669, Prepared for Kilo Goldmines Ltd, September 2013.

Venmyn Rand, 2012. Updated National Instrument 43-101 Independent Technical Report on the Ngayu Gold Project, Orientale Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Report prepared for Loncor Resources Inc. by Venmyn Rand (Pty) Ltd. May 2012.

Wardell Armstrong International (WAI), August 2011. Characterization Testwork on Samples of Gold Ore from Adumbi Deposit, Democratic Republic of Congo, Report Number MM584.

Wardell Armstrong International (WAI), October 2011. Optimization Testwork on Samples of Gold Ore from Adumbi Deposit, Democratic Republic of Congo, Report Number MM601.

Young, Stuart & Associates Inc., 2013. KGL Somituri Project, Survey Report.


DATE AND SIGNATURE PAGE

This report was prepared for Loncor Gold Inc. by Minecon Resources and Services Limited. This report, the effective date of which is November 17, 2021, is compliant with S-K 1300 and NI 43-101. The qualified persons (within the meaning of S-K 1300 and NI 43-101) for the purposes of this report are Daniel Bansah and Christian Bawah who have signed below. 

Signed on April 29, 2022 

(signed) "Daniel Bansah"

 

(signed) "Christian Bawah" 

Daniel Bansah

 

Christian Bawah

MSc (MinEx), MAusIMM (CP), FWAIMM, MGhIG

 

BSc (Hons) Geology, MBA (Finance), MAusIMM (CP), MMCC, FWAIMM, MGhIG

Chairman and Managing Director

 

Director, Geology and Mineral Exploration

Minecon Resources and Services Limited

 

Minecon Resources and Services Limited

Accra, Ghana

 

Accra, Ghana



CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON - DANIEL BANSAH

I, Daniel Bansah, do hereby certify that

1. I reside at No. 8, Kweku Mensah Street, Adjiringanor, Accra, Ghana. Box CT 4096 Cantonments, Accra, Ghana.

2. I am a graduate with a Master of Science with Distinction in Mineral Exploration gained from the University of Leicester, UK, in 1998, and I have practised my profession continuously since July 1988.

3. I am a Fellow of the West African Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (Membership Number 074), a chartered professional member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (Membership Number 208213), and a professional member of the Ghana Institute of Geoscientists (Membership Number 188).

4. I am the Chairman and Managing Director of Minecon Resources and Services Limited, a firm of consulting geology, mining and petroleum engineers.

5. I have experience with precious metal deposits and resource estimation techniques. I have worked as a geologist for over 30 years since my graduation. My relevant experience for the purposes of the technical report to which this certificate is attached (the "Technical Report") is as follows:

  • Reviewed various reports as a consultant on numerous exploration and mining projects in Ghana and the African region for due diligence studies.
  • Head of Projects and Operations (from 2013 to 2018) with a Canadian gold mining company exploring and developing world-class gold assets in northeastern DRC and responsible for the management of two operating gold mines, two advanced exploration projects, and an extensive regional exploration portfolio with over 16 prospective targets.
  • Vice President - Exploration (2007 to 2013) with a Canadian gold exploration and development company, exploring and developing world-class gold assets in northeastern DRC and responsible for the management of two development gold projects, two advanced exploration projects and an extensive regional exploration portfolio with over 16 prospective targets.
  • Group Mineral Resources Manager (from 2004 to 2007) with a Canadian gold exploration company exploring world-class gold assets in northeastern DRC and responsible for mineral resource development and management.
  • Group Mineral Resources Manager (from 1998 to 2004) with a Ghanaian gold mining, development and exploration company, with 7 world-class operations and an extensive development and exploration portfolio in 17 African countries, and responsible for mineral resource and mineral reserve development, auditing, management and training.
  • Senior Mineral Resources/Senior Geologist Exploration/Project Geologist/Geologist (from 1989 to 1998) with a Ghanaian gold mining, development and exploration company, with 7 world-class operations and an extensive development and exploration portfolio in 17 African countries, and responsible for the mineral resource modelling and grade estimation and mineral exploration project management.

6. I have read the definition of "qualified person" set out in S-K 1300 and NI 43-101 and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional organization and past relevant work experience I fulfil the requirements to be a "qualified person" for the purposes of S-K 1300 and NI 43-101.

7. I am responsible for Sections 1 to 5 and Sections 11 to 20 of the Technical Report.

8. I have visited the Imbo Project including the Adumbi deposit, many times, with the most recent visit being in September 2021.

9. I am independent of Loncor Gold Inc. as described in Section 1.5 of NI 43-101.


10. I have not had any prior involvement with the property which is the subject of the Technical Report.

11. I have read S-K 1300 and NI 43-101, and the Technical Report has been prepared in compliance with S-K 1300 and NI 43-101, and in conformity with generally accepted international mining industry practices.

12. At the effective date of the Technical Report, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Technical Report contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading.

Dated the 29th day of April, 2022.

(Signed) "Daniel Bansah"

____________________________

DANIEL BANSAH

MSc (MinEx), MAusIMM (CP), FWAIMM, MGhIG

Chairman and Managing Director

Minecon Resources and Services Limited


CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON - CHRISTIAN BAWAH

I, Christian Bawah, do hereby certify that

1. I reside at K506 Nii Obaayoo Street, Adjiringanor, East Legon, Accra, Ghana. Box YK 431 Kanda, Accra, Ghana.

2. I am a graduate with a Master of Business Administration with Merit in Finance gained from the University of Leicester Business School, UK, in 2013, a holder of a Mine Managers Certificate of Competency from the Inspectorate Division of the Minerals Commission of Ghana in 2012, and a Bachelor of Science (Honours) in Geology with Physics from the University of Ghana in 1994. I have practised my profession as a geologist continuously since August 1994.

3. I am a chartered professional member (in Geology) of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (Membership Number 227522), a Fellow of the West African Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (Membership Number 1377), and a professional member of the Ghana Institution of Geoscientists (Membership Number 189).

4. I am the Executive Director, Geology and Mineral Exploration of Minecon Resources and Services Limited, a firm of consulting geology, mining and petroleum engineers.

5. I have considerable experience in gold exploration techniques in Africa, as well as mining project development and operations. I have worked in the mining industry for over 26 years since my graduation. My relevant experience for the purposes of the technical report to which this certificate is attached (the "Technical Report") is as follows:

  • Have been involved with geological consultancy work and have reviewed various reports on numerous exploration and mining projects in Ghana and the African region for due diligence studies.
  • General Manager (from 2013 to 2018) with a Canadian gold mining, exploration and development company exploring, developing and operating world-class gold assets in northeastern DRC and responsible for overseeing the redesign and completion of project development, commissioning, and running the operations.
  • Deputy General Manager (2012 to 2013) with a Canadian gold mining, exploration, and development company, exploring, developing, and operating world-class gold assets in northeastern DRC and responsible for mining operations, mining geology and near mine exploration.
  • Mineral Resources Manager (from 2011 to 2013) with a Canadian gold mining, and exploration and development company exploring, developing, and operating world-class gold assets in northeastern DRC and responsible for mineral resource development and management, mining production geology, mine to mill reconciliation, and near mine exploration.
  • Chief Geologist (from 2007 to 2011) with a Canadian gold mining and exploration and development company exploring world-class gold assets in northeastern DRC and responsible for exploration from grass roots through scoping, pre-feasibility and full-feasibility studies. Was part of the project development team during the mine construction.
  • Senior Project Geologist (from 2004 to 2007) with a Canadian gold exploration company exploring world-class gold assets in northeastern DRC and responsible for setting up and running two of the company's key exploration projects.
  • Exploration Geologist (from 1996 to 2004) with a Ghanaian gold mining, development and exploration company, with 7 world-class operations and an extensive development and exploration portfolio in 17 African countries and supervised exploration projects in Ghana, Mali Côte d'Ivoire, and Guinea.
  • Geologist (from 1995 to 1996) with a Ghanaian gold mining and exploration company, a global multinational precious metal producer presently the largest gold producer in Ghana. Was involved with near mine exploration activities.

  • Teaching/Research Assistant (from 1994 to 1995) with the Geology Department of the University of Ghana, and was responsible for students' tutorials and practical lessons, filing of mapping exercises, and assisting lectures with research work.

6. I have read the definition of "qualified person" set out in S-K 1300 and NI 43-101 and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional organization and past relevant work experience I fulfil the requirements to be a "qualified person" for the purposes of S-K 1300 and NI 43-101.

7. I am responsible for Sections 6 to 10 of the Technical Report.

8. I visited the Imbo Project including the Adumbi deposit, from October 8 to November 27, 2020.

9. I remotely managed and reviewed drilling activities on site from November 28, 2020, to end November 2021.

10. I am independent of Loncor Gold Inc. as described in Section 1.5 of NI 43-101.

11. I have not had any prior involvement with the property which is the subject of the Technical Report.

12. I have read S-K 1300 and NI 43-101, and the part of the Technical Report that I am responsible for has been prepared in compliance with S-K 1300 and NI 43-101, and in conformity with generally accepted international mining industry practices.

13. At the effective date of the Technical Report, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the part of the Technical Report that I am responsible for contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading.

Dated the 29th day of April, 2022.

(Signed) "Christian Bawah"

____________________________

CHRISTIAN BAWAH

BSc (Hons) Geology, MBA (Finance), MAusIMM (CP), MMCC, FWAIMM, MGhIG

Director, Geology and Mineral Exploration

Minecon Resources and Services Limited