Washington, D.C. 20549



Amendment No. 1





(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



(State or jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)


(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number)


(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)


501 West Broadway, Suite 800, San Diego, CA 92101/ Phone (619) 301-4200

(Address and telephone number of principal executive offices)


Stephen Thomas, Chief Executive Officer

501 West Broadway, Suite 800, San Diego, CA 92101/ Phone (619) 301-4200

(Name, address and telephone number of agent for service)



Michael A. Littman, Attorney at Law

P.O. Box 1839, Arvada, CO 80001 / phone (720) 530-6184


Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as possible after this Registration Statement becomes effective.


If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box. [X]


If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [ ]


If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [ ]


If this Form is a post effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [ ]


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer [___]   Accelerated filer [___]

Non-accelerated filer

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

[___]   Smaller reporting company [_X_]




Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933. [ ]


If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act. [_]







Title of Each Class of Securities To Be Registered Amount To Be Registered Proposed Maximum Offering Price Per Share Proposed Maximum Aggregate Offering Price (1) Amount of Registration Fee
Common Stock by Selling Shareholders 36,953,025 $0. 15 $ 5,542,953.75 $ 690.10(2)


(1) Estimated solely for the purpose of computing the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act of 1933 ("the Securities Act") based on the average of the 5-day average of the closing price of the common stock on February 16, 2018 as reported on the OTC Market QB.
(2) $763.68 was paid with original S-1 filing.


The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

















(Subject to Completion)





36,953,025 shares of common stock of selling shareholders


We are registering securities listed for sale on behalf of selling shareholders: 36,953,025 shares of common stock.


We will not receive any proceeds from sales of shares by selling shareholders.


Our selling shareholders plan to sell common shares at $0.10 as a fixed price for so long as our Company is quoted on OTCLINK “Pink” and upon achievement of quotation of our Company upon the OTCQB shareholders may sell market prices for the securities as the market may dictate from time to time. There is a limited market price for the common stock, which is trad ing on the OTC LINK “Pink” , (“TPTG”) in the range of $0. 15 in the past 5 days.


Title Price Per Share
Common Stock $ $0. 15 *


*Five-day average market price


Our security holders may sell their securities at $0.10 as a fixed price for so long as our Company is quoted on OTCLINK “Pink” and upon achievement of quotation of our Company upon the OTCQB at market prices or at any price in privately negotiated transactions.


This offering involves a high degree of risk; see "RISK FACTORS" beginning on page 6 to read about factors you should consider before buying shares of the common stock.


These securities have not been approved or disapproved by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) or any state or provincial securities commission, nor has the SEC or any state or provincial securities commission passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.



This offering will be on a delayed and continuous basis only for sales of selling shareholders shares. The selling shareholders are not paying any of the offering expenses and we will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of the shares by the selling shareholders. (See “Description of Securities – Shares”).


The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the date that the registration statement relating to these securities, which has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, becomes effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.


The date of this Prospectus is February 22, 2018 .

Table of Contents  



ITEM 1. Front of Registration Statement and Outside Front Cover Page of Prospectus  
ITEM 2. Prospectus Cover Page  
ITEM 3. Prospectus Summary Information, Risk Factors and Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges 3
ITEM 4. Use of Proceeds 2 5
ITEM 5. Determination of Offering Price 2 5
ITEM 6. Dilution 2 7
ITEM 7. Selling Security Holders 2 7
ITEM 8. Plan of Distribution 33
ITEM 9. Description of Securities 33
ITEM 10. Interest of Named Experts and Counsel 3 5
ITEM 11. Information with Respect to the Registrant 3 5
  a. Description of Business 3 5
  b. Description of Property 63
  c. Legal Proceedings 63
  d. Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters 64
  e. Financial Statements      65
  f. Selected Financial Data 66
  g. Supplementary Financial Information 66
  h. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 66
  i. Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 72
  j. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 72
  k. Directors and Executive Officers 72
  l. Executive and Directors Compensation 75
  m. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management 79
  n. Certain Relationships, Related Transactions, Promoters And Control Persons 81
ITEM 11 A. Material Changes 83
ITEM 12. Incorporation of Certain Information by Reference 83
ITEM 12 A. Disclosure of Commission Position on Indemnification for Securities Act Liabilities 84
ITEM 13. Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution 85
ITEM 14. Indemnification of Directors and Officers 85
ITEM 15. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities 86
ITEM 16. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 87
ITEM 17. Undertakings 89
  Signatures 90



Table of Contents  



Our Company


TPT Global Tech, Inc. (“We”, “us”, “our” “TPT” or “TPT Global”), is incorporated in the State of Florida with operations located in San Diego, California, providing complete, communication and data services and products to small to mid-sized organizations (“SMB”).






We were originally incorporated in 1988 in the state of Florida. TPT Global, Inc., a Nevada corporation formed in June 2014, merged with Ally Pharma US, Inc., a Florida corporation, (“Ally Pharma”, formerly known as Gold Royalty Corporation) in a “reverse merger” wherein Ally Pharma issued 110,000,000 shares of Common Stock, or 80% ownership, to the owners of TPT Global, Inc. and Ally Pharma changed its name to TPT Global Tech, Inc. In 2014, we acquired all the assets of K Telecom and Wireless LLC (“K Telecom”) and Global Telecom International, LLC (“Global Telecom”). Effective January 31, 2015, we completed our acquisition of 100% of the outstanding stock of Copperhead Digital Holdings, Inc. (“Copperhead Digital”) and Subsidiaries, TruCom, LLC (“TruCom”), Nevada Utilities, Inc. (“Nevada Utilities”) and CityNet Arizona, LLC (“CityNet”). In October 2015, we acquired the assets of both Port2Port, Inc. (“Port2Port”) and Digithrive, Inc. (“Digithrive”). Effective September 30, 2016, we acquired 100% ownership in San Diego Media, Inc. (“SDM”). In December 2016, we acquired the Lion Phone technology. In October and November 2017, we entered into agreements to acquire Blue Collar, Inc. (“Blue Collar”), Hollywood Riviera, LLC (“HRS”), and certain assets of Matrixsites, Inc. (“Matrixsites”). The agreements to acquire Blue Collar and HRS include terms and conditions that, until seller financing is paid off restricts on TPT’s control of the assets and ownership interests, among other restrictions.


We are based in San Diego, California, and operate as a Media Content Hub for Domestic and International syndication Technology/Telecommunications company operating on our own proprietary Global Digital Media TV and Telecommunications infrastructure platform and also provides technology solutions to businesses domestically and worldwide. We offer Software as a Service (SaaS), Technology Platform as a Service (PAAS), Cloud-based Unified Communication as a Service (UCaaS) and carrier-grade performance and support for businesses over our private IP MPLS fiber and wireless network in the United States. Our cloud-based UCaaS services allow businesses of any size to enjoy all the latest voice, data, media and collaboration features in today's global technology markets. We also operate as a Master Distributor for Nationwide Mobile Virtual network Operators (MVNO) and Independent Sales Organization (ISO) as a Master Distributor for Pre-Paid Cellphone services, Mobile phones, Cellphone Accessories and Global Roaming Cellphones.


Our executive offices are located at 501 West Broadway, Suite 800, San Diego, CA 92101 and the telephone number is (619) 400-4996. We maintain a website at www.tptglobaltech.com, and such website is not incorporated into or a part of this filing.


Implications of Being an Emerging Growth Company


As a company with less than $1.0 billion of revenue during our last fiscal year, we qualify as an emerging growth company as defined in the JOBS Act, and we may remain an emerging growth company for up to five years from the date of the first sale in this offering. However, if certain events occur prior to the end of such five-year period, including if we become a large accelerated filer, our annual gross revenue exceeds $1.0 billion, or we issue more than $1.0 billion of non-convertible debt in any three-year period, we will cease to be an emerging growth company prior to the end of such five-year period. For so long as we remain an emerging growth company, we are permitted and intend to rely on exemptions from certain disclosure and other requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies. In particular, in this prospectus, we have provided only two years of audited financial statements and have not included all of the executive compensation related information that would be required if we were not an emerging growth company. Accordingly, the information contained herein may be different than the information you receive from other public companies in which you hold equity interests. However, we have irrevocably elected not to avail ourselves of the extended transition period for complying with

Table of Contents  

new or revised accounting standards, and, therefore, we will be subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that are not emerging growth companies.


Summary of Financial Information


The following tables set forth, for the periods and as of the dates indicated, our summary financial data. The statements of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2017, and the balance sheet data as of September 30, 2017 are derived from our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. The unaudited financial statements include, in the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, that management considers necessary for the fair presentation of the financial information set forth in those statements. You should read the following information together with the more detailed information contained in “Selected Financial Data,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. Our historical results are not indicative of the results to be expected in the future and results of interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the entire year. The statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, and balance sheet data as of December 31, 2016, are derived from our audited financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. You should read the following information together with the more detailed information contained in “Selected Financial Data,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. Our historical results are not indicative of the results to be expected in the future.


  September 30, December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
Total Assets $5,037,221 $6,081,222 $4,976,670
Current Liabilities $6,652,689 $5,609,676 $4,137,705
Long-term Liabilities $261,872 $257,088 $12,519
Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) ($1,877,340) $214,458 $826,447


  Nine Months Ended Three Months Ended Years Ended

September 30, 2017


September 30, 2017


December 31, 2016 (Audited)

December 31, 2015


Revenues $1,782,722 $477,184 $2,766,730 $3,204,423
Net Loss ($2,130,562) ($653,497) ($4,463,199) ($4,963,858)


At September 30, 2017, the accumulated deficit was $11,748,600. At December 31, 2016, the accumulated deficit was $9,618,038. At December 31, 2015, the accumulated deficit was $5,154,839. We anticipate that we will operate in a deficit position and continue to sustain net losses for the foreseeable future.



Table of Contents  






(1) Acquisition agreements executed November 2017 and amended February 2018.


The Offering


We are registering 36,953,025 shares for sale on behalf of selling shareholders.


Our common stock, only, will be transferable immediately upon the effectiveness of the Registration Statement. (See “Description of Securities”)


Common shares outstanding before this offering 136,953,904
Maximum common shares being offered by our existing selling shareholders 36,953,025
Maximum common shares outstanding after this offering 136,953,904


We are authorized to issue 1,000,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001 and 100,000,000 shares of preferred stock. Our current shareholders, officers and directors collectively own 136,953,904 shares of restricted common stock as of this date. Our shares being registered were issued in the following amounts and at the following prices:


Number of Shares Original Consideration Issue Price Per Share
2,000,000 Founders Services $0.001
10,821,250 Asset Acquisition $0.10 to $0.81
2,983,380 Conversion of Convertible Promissory Notes $0.20 to $0.80
4,278,496 Private Placement $0.10 to $0.50
8,876,649 Services $0.10 to $0.30
4,005,217 Prior Ally Pharma $0.001
3,9 88,033 Gifts to Family $0.001



Currently there is a limited public trading market for our stock on OTC LINK “ Pink ” under the symbol “TPTG.”

Table of Contents  

Forward Looking Statements


This prospectus contains various forward-looking statements that are based on our beliefs as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to us. When used in this prospectus, the words "believe", "expect", "anticipate", "estimate" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements may include statements regarding seeking business opportunities, payment of operating expenses, and the like, and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions which could cause actual results to differ materially from projections or estimates. Factors which could cause actual results to differ materially are discussed at length under the heading "Risk Factors". Should one or more of the enumerated risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or projected. Investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, all of which speak only as of the date made.




Many of our competitors are better established and have resources significantly greater than we have, which may make it difficult to attract and retain subscribers.


We will compete with other providers of telephony service, many of which have substantially greater financial, technical and marketing resources, larger customer bases, longer operating histories, greater name recognition and more established relationships in the industry. In addition, a number of these competitors may combine or form strategic partnerships. As a result, our competitors may be able to offer, or bring to market earlier, products and services that are superior to our own in terms of features, quality, pricing or other factors. Our failure to compete successfully with any of these companies would have a material adverse effect on our business and the trading price of our common stock.


The market for broadband and VoIP services is highly competitive, and we compete with several other companies within a single market:

  cable operators offering high-speed Internet connectivity services and voice communications;
  incumbent and competitive local exchange carriers providing DSL services over their existing wide, metropolitan and local area networks;
  3G cellular, PCS and other wireless providers offering wireless broadband services and capabilities, including developments in existing cellular and PCS technology that may increase network speeds or have other advantages over our services;
  internet service providers offering dial-up Internet connectivity;
  municipalities and other entities operating free or subsidized WiFi networks;
  providers of VoIP telephony services;
  wireless Internet service providers using licensed or unlicensed spectrum;
  satellite and fixed wireless service providers offering or developing broadband Internet connectivity and VoIP telephony;
  electric utilities and other providers offering or planning to offer broadband Internet connectivity over power lines; and
  resellers providing wireless Internet service by “piggy-backing” on DSL or WiFi networks operated by others.


Moreover, we expect other existing and prospective competitors, particularly if our services are successful; to adopt technologies or business plans similar to ours, or seek other means to develop a product competitive with our services. Many of our competitors are well-established and have larger and better developed networks and systems, longer-standing relationships with customers and suppliers, greater name recognition and greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we have. These competitors can often subsidize competing services with revenues from other sources, such as advertising, and thus may offer their products and services at lower prices than ours. These or other competitors may also reduce the prices of their services significantly or may offer broadband

Table of Contents  

connectivity packaged with other products or services. We may not be able to reduce our prices or otherwise alter our services correspondingly, which would make it more difficult to attract and retain subscribers.


Our Acquisitions could result in operating difficulties, dilution and distractions from our core business.


We have evaluated, and expect to continue to evaluate, potential strategic transactions, including larger acquisitions. The process of acquiring and integrating a company, business or technology is risky, may require a disproportionate amount of our management or financial resources and may create unforeseen operating difficulties or expenditures, including:

  difficulties in integrating acquired technologies and operations into our business while maintaining uniform standards, controls, policies and procedures;
  increasing cost and complexity of assuring the implementation and maintenance of adequate internal control and disclosure controls and procedures, and of obtaining the reports and attestations that are required of a company filing reports under the Securities Exchange Act;
  difficulties in consolidating and preparing our financial statements due to poor accounting records, weak financial controls and, in some cases, procedures at acquired entities based on accounting principles not generally accepted in the United States, particularly those entities in which we lack control; and
  the inability to predict or anticipate market developments and capital commitments relating to the acquired company, business or technology.


Acquisitions of and joint ventures with companies organized outside the United States often involve additional risks, including:

  difficulties, as a result of distance, language or culture differences, in developing, staffing and managing foreign operations;
  lack of control over our joint ventures and other business relationships;
  currency exchange rate fluctuations;
  longer payment cycles;
  credit risk and higher levels of payment fraud;
  foreign exchange controls that might limit our control over, or prevent us from repatriating, cash generated outside the United States;
  potentially adverse tax consequences;
  expropriation or nationalization of assets;
  differences in regulatory requirements that may make it difficult to offer all of our services;
  unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;
  trade barriers and import and export restrictions; and
  political or social unrest and economic instability.


The anticipated benefit of any of our acquisitions or investments may never materialize. Future investments, acquisitions or dispositions could result in potentially dilutive issuances of our equity securities, the incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities or amortization expenses, or write-offs of goodwill, any of which could harm our financial condition. Future investments and acquisitions may require us to obtain additional equity or debt financing, which may not be available on favorable terms, or at all.


Our substantial indebtedness and our current default status and any restrictive debt covenants could limit our financing options and liquidity position and may limit our ability to grow our business.


Our indebtedness could have important consequences to the holders of our common stock, such as:

  we may not be able to obtain additional financing to fund working capital, operating losses, capital expenditures or acquisitions on terms acceptable to us or at all;
  we may be unable to refinance our indebtedness on terms acceptable to us or at all;
  if substantial indebtedness continues it could make us more vulnerable to economic downturns and limit our ability to withstand competitive pressures; and
Table of Contents  


  cash flows from operations are currently negative and may continue to be so, and our remaining cash, if any, may be insufficient to operate our business.
  paying dividends to our stockholders;
  incurring, or cause certain of our subsidiaries to incur, additional indebtedness;
  permitting liens on or conduct sales of any assets pledged as collateral;
  selling all or substantially all of our assets or consolidate or merge with or into other companies;
  repaying existing indebtedness; and
  engaging in transactions with affiliates.


Currently, we have no debt in default. As of September 30, 2017, the total debt or financing arrangements was $3,856,744. As of September 30, 2017, however, capital leases in the amount of $101,348, or 1.5% of total current liabilities, are in default. Our inability to renegotiate our indebtedness may cause lien holders to obtain possession of a good portion of our assets which would significantly alter our ability to generate revenues and obtain any additional financing.


We may experience difficulties in constructing, upgrading and maintaining our network, which could adversely affect customer satisfaction, increase subscriber turnover and reduce our revenues.


Our success depends on developing and providing products and services that give subscribers a high quality Internet connectivity and VoIP experience. If the number of subscribers using our network and the complexity of our products and services increase, we will require more infrastructure and network resources to maintain the quality of our services. Consequently, we expect to make substantial investments to construct and improve our facilities and equipment and to upgrade our technology and network infrastructure. If we do not implement these developments successfully, or if we experience inefficiencies, operational failures or unforeseen costs during implementation, the quality of our products and services could decline.


We may experience quality deficiencies, cost overruns and delays on construction, maintenance and upgrade projects, including the portions of those projects not within our control or the control of our contractors. The construction of our network requires the receipt of permits and approvals from numerous governmental bodies, including municipalities and zoning boards. Such bodies often limit the expansion of transmission towers and other construction necessary for our business. Failure to receive approvals in a timely fashion can delay system rollouts and raise the cost of completing construction projects. In addition, we typically are required to obtain rights from land, building and tower owners to install our antennas and other equipment to provide service to our subscribers. We may not be able to obtain, on terms acceptable to us, or at all, the rights necessary to construct our network and expand our services.


We also face challenges in managing and operating our network. These challenges include operating, maintaining and upgrading network and customer premises equipment to accommodate increased traffic or technological advances, and managing the sales, advertising, customer support, billing and collection functions of our business while providing reliable network service at expected speeds and VoIP telephony at expected levels of quality. Our failure in any of these areas could adversely affect customer satisfaction, increase subscriber turnover, increase our costs, decrease our revenues and otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.


If we do not obtain and maintain rights to use licensed spectrum in one or more markets, we may be unable to operate in these markets, which could adversely affect our ability to execute our business strategy.


Even though we have established license agreements, growth requires that we plan to provide our services obtaining additional licensed spectrum both in the United States and internationally, we depend on our ability to acquire and maintain sufficient rights to use licensed spectrum by obtaining our own licenses or long-term spectrum leases, in each of the markets in which we operate or intend to operate. Licensing is the short-term solution to obtaining the necessary spectrum as building out spectrum is a long and difficult process that can be costly and require a disproportionate amount of our management resources. We may not be able to acquire, lease or maintain the spectrum necessary to execute our business strategy.       


Using licensed spectrum, whether owned or leased, poses additional risks to us, including:

Table of Contents  


  inability to satisfy build-out or service deployment requirements upon which our spectrum licenses or leases are, or may be, conditioned;
  increases in spectrum acquisition costs;
  adverse changes to regulations governing our spectrum rights;
  the risk that spectrum we have acquired or leased will not be commercially usable or free of harmful interference from licensed or unlicensed operators in our or adjacent bands;
  with respect to spectrum we will lease in the United States, contractual disputes with or the bankruptcy or other reorganization of the license holders, which could adversely affect our control over the spectrum subject to such license;
  failure of the FCC or other regulators to renew our spectrum licenses as they expire; and
  invalidation of our authorization to use all or a significant portion of our spectrum, resulting in, among other things, impairment charges related to assets recorded for such spectrum.


If we fail to establish and maintain an effective system of internal control, we may not be able to report our financial results accurately or to prevent fraud. Any inability to report and file our financial results accurately and timely could harm our business and adversely impact the trading price of our common stock.


Effective internal control is necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and prevent fraud. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, we may not be able to manage our business as effectively as we would if an effective control environment existed, and our business, brand and reputation with investors may be harmed.


In addition, reporting a material weakness may negatively impact investors’ perception of us. We have allocated, and will continue to allocate, significant additional resources to remedy any deficiencies in our internal control. There can be no assurances that our remedial measures will be successful in curing the any material weakness or that other significant deficiencies or material weaknesses will not arise in the future.


Interruption or failure of our information technology and communications systems could impair our ability to provide our products and services, which could damage our reputation and harm our operating results.


We have experienced service interruptions in some markets in the past and may experience service interruptions or system failures in the future. Any unscheduled service interruption adversely affects our ability to operate our business and could result in an immediate loss of revenues. If we experience frequent or persistent system or network failures, our reputation and brand could be permanently harmed. We may make significant capital expenditures to increase the reliability of our systems, but these capital expenditures may not achieve the results we expect.


Our products and services depend on the continuing operation of our information technology and communications systems. Any damage to or failure of our systems could result in interruptions in our service. Interruptions in our service could reduce our revenues and profits, and our brand could be damaged if people believe our network is unreliable. Our systems are vulnerable to damage or interruption from earthquakes, terrorist attacks, floods, fires, power loss, telecommunications failures, computer viruses, computer denial of service attacks or other attempts to harm our systems, and similar events. Some of our systems are not fully redundant, and our disaster recovery planning may not be adequate. The occurrence of a natural disaster or unanticipated problems at our network centers could result in lengthy interruptions in our service and adversely affect our operating results.


The industries in which we operate are continually evolving, which makes it difficult to evaluate our future prospects and increases the risk of your investment. Our products and services may become obsolete, and we may not be able to develop competitive products or services on a timely basis or at all.


The markets in which we and our customers compete are characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards and communications protocols, and continuous improvements in products and services. Our future success depends on our ability to enhance current products and to develop and introduce in a timely manner new products that keep pace with technological developments, industry standards and communications protocols, compete effectively on the basis of price, performance and quality, adequately address end-user customer

Table of Contents  

requirements and achieve market acceptance. There can be no assurance that the deployment of wireless networks will not be delayed or that our products will achieve widespread market acceptance or be capable of providing service at competitive prices in sufficient volumes. In the event that our products are not timely and economically developed or do not gain widespread market acceptance, our business, results of operations and financial condition would be materially adversely affected. There can also be no assurance that our products will not be rendered obsolete by the introduction and acceptance of new communications protocols.


The broadband services industry is characterized by rapid technological change, competitive pricing, frequent new service introductions and evolving industry standards and regulatory requirements. We believe that our success depends on our ability to anticipate and adapt to these challenges and to offer competitive services on a timely basis. We face a number of difficulties and uncertainties associated with our reliance on technological development, such as:

  competition from service providers using more traditional and commercially proven means to deliver similar or alternative services;
  competition from new service providers using more efficient, less expensive technologies, including products not yet invented or developed;
  uncertain consumer acceptance;
  realizing economies of scale;
  responding successfully to advances in competing technologies in a timely and cost-effective manner;
  migration toward standards-based technology, requiring substantial capital expenditures; and
  existing, proposed or undeveloped technologies that may render our wireless broadband and VoIP telephony services less profitable or obsolete.


As the products and services offered by us and our competitors develop, businesses and consumers may not accept our services as a commercially viable alternative to other means of delivering wireless broadband and VoIP telephony services.


If we are unable to successfully develop and market additional services and/or new generations of our services offerings or market our services and product offerings to a broad number of customers, we may not remain competitive.


Our future success and our ability to increase net revenue and earnings depend, in part, on our ability to develop and market new additional services and/or new generations of our current services offerings and market our existing services offerings to a broad number of customers. However, we may not be able to, among other things:


· successfully develop or market new services or product offerings or enhance existing services offerings;
· educate third-party sales organizations adequately for them to promote and sell our services offerings;
· develop, market and distribute existing and future services offerings in a cost-effective manner; or
· operate the facilities needed to provide our services offerings.


If we fail to develop new service offerings, or if we incur unexpected expenses or delays in product development or integration, we may lose our competitive position and incur substantial additional expenses or may be required to curtail or terminate all or part of our present planned business operations.


Our failure to do any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, if any of our current or future services offerings contain undetected errors or design defects or do not work as expected for our customers, our ability to market these services offerings could be substantially impeded, resulting in lost sales, potential reputation damage and delays in obtaining market acceptance of these services offerings. We cannot assure you that we will continue to successfully develop and market new or enhanced applications for our services offerings. If we do not continue to expand our services offerings portfolio on a timely basis or if those products and applications do not receive market acceptance, become regulatory restricted, or become obsolete, we will not grow our business as currently expected.

Table of Contents  


We operate in a very competitive environment.


There are three types of competitors for our service offerings.


(1) The value-added resellers and other vendors of hardware and software for on-site installation do not typically have an offering similar to our cloud-based services. However, they are the primary historic service suppliers to our targeted customers and will actively work to defend their customer base.


(2) There are a number of providers offering services, but they typically offer only one or two applications of their choosing instead of our offering which bundles customer’s chosen services.


(3) There are a few providers that offer more than two applications from the cloud. However currently, these providers typically offer only those applications they have chosen.


Our industry is characterized by rapid change resulting from technological advances and new services offerings. Certain competitors have substantially greater capital resources, larger customer bases, larger sales forces, greater marketing and management resources, larger research and development staffs and larger facilities than our and have more established reputations with our target customers, as well as distribution channels that are entrenched and may be more effective than ours. Competitors may develop and offer technologies and products that are more effective, have better features, are easier to use, are less expensive and/or are more readily accepted by the marketplace than our offerings. Their products could make our technology and service offerings obsolete or noncompetitive. Competitors may also be able to achieve more efficient operations and distribution than ours may be able to and may offer lower prices than we could offer profitably. We may decide to alter or discontinue aspects of our business and may adopt different strategies due to business or competitive factors or factors currently unforeseen, such as the introduction by competitors of new products or services technologies that would make part or all of our service offerings obsolete or uncompetitive.


In addition, the industry could experience some consolidation. There is also a risk that larger companies will enter our markets.


If we fail to maintain effective relationships with our major vendors, our services offerings and profitability could suffer.


We use third party providers for services. In addition, we purchase hardware, software and services from external suppliers. Accordingly, we must maintain effective relationships with our vendor base to source our needs, maintain continuity of supply, and achieve reasonable costs. If we fail to maintain effective relationships with our vendor base, this may adversely affect our ability to deliver the best products and services to our customers and our profitability could suffer.


Any failure of the physical or electronic security that resulted in unauthorized parties gaining access to customer data could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.


We use commercial data networks to service customers cloud based services and the associated customer data. Any data is subject to the risk of physical or electronic intrusion by unauthorized parties. We have a multi-homed firewalls and Intrusion Detection / Prevention systems to protect against electronic intrusion and two physical security levels in our networks. Our policy is to close all external ports as a default. Robust anti-virus software runs on all client servers. Systems have automated monitoring and alerting for unusual activity. We also have a Security Officer who monitors these systems. We have better security systems and expertise than our clients can afford separately but any failure of these systems could adversely affect our business growth and financial condition.


Table of Contents  

Demand for our service offerings may decrease if new government regulations substantially increase costs, limit delivery or change the use of Internet access and other products on which our service offerings depend.


We are dependent on Internet access to deliver our service offerings. If new regulations are imposed that limit the use of the Internet or impose significant taxes on services delivered via the Internet it could change our cost structure and/or affect our business model. The significant changes in regulatory costs or new limitations on Internet use could impact our ability to operate as we anticipate, could damage our reputation with our customers, disrupt our business or result in, among other things, decreased net revenue and increased overhead costs. As a result, any such failure could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.


Our securities, as offered hereby, are highly speculative and should be purchased only by persons who can afford to lose their entire investment in us. Each prospective investor should carefully consider the following risk factors, as well as all other information set forth elsewhere in this prospectus, before purchasing any of the shares of our common stock.



Increasing regulation of our Internet-based products and services could adversely affect our ability to provide new products and services.


On February 26, 2015, the FCC adopted a new "network neutrality" or Open Internet order (the "2015 Order") that: (1) reclassified broadband Internet access service as a Title II common carrier service, (2) applied certain existing Title II provisions and associated regulations; (3) forbore from applying a range of other existing Title II provisions and associated regulations, but to varying degrees indicated that this forbearance may be only temporary and (4) issued new rules expanding disclosure requirements and prohibiting blocking, throttling, paid prioritization and unreasonable interference with the ability of end users and edge providers to reach each other. The 2015 Order also subjected broadband providers' Internet traffic exchange rates and practices to potential FCC oversight and created a mechanism for third parties to file complaints regarding these matters. The 2015 Order could limit our ability to efficiently manage our cable systems and respond to operational and competitive challenges. In December 2017, the FCC adopted an order (the "2017 Order") that in large part reverses the 2015 Order. The 2017 Order has not yet gone into effect, however, and the 2015 Order will remain binding until the 2017 Order takes effect. The 2017 Order is expected to be subject to legal challenge that may delay its effect or overturn it. Additionally, Congress and some states are considering legislation that may codify "network neutrality" rules.


Offering telephone services may subject us to additional regulatory burdens, causing us to incur additional costs.


We offer telephone services over our broadband network and continue to develop and deploy interconnected VoIP services. The FCC has ruled that competitive telephone companies that support VoIP services, such as those that we offer to our customers, are entitled to interconnect with incumbent providers of traditional telecommunications services, which ensures that our VoIP services can operate in the market. However, the scope of these interconnection rights are being reviewed in a current FCC proceeding, which may affect our ability to compete in the provision of telephony services or result in additional costs. It remains unclear precisely to what extent federal and state regulators will subject VoIP services to traditional telephone service regulation. Expanding our offering of these services may require us to obtain certain authorizations, including federal and state licenses. We may not be able to obtain such authorizations in a timely manner, or conditions could be imposed upon such licenses or authorizations that may not be favorable to us. The FCC has already extended certain traditional telecommunications requirements, such as E911 capabilities, Universal Service Fund contribution, Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act ("CALEA"), measures to protect Customer Proprietary Network Information, customer privacy, disability access, number porting, battery back-up, network outage reporting, rural call completion reporting and other regulatory requirements to many VoIP providers such as us. If additional telecommunications regulations are applied to our VoIP service, it could cause us to incur additional costs and may otherwise materially adversely impact our operations. In 2011, the FCC released an order significantly changing the rules governing intercarrier compensation for the origination and termination of telephone traffic between interconnected carriers. These rules have resulted in a substantial decrease in interstate compensation payments over a multi-year period. The FCC is currently considering additional reforms that could further reduce interstate compensation payments. Further, although the FCC recently declined to impose additional regulatory burdens on certain point to point transport

Table of Contents  

("special access") services provided by cable companies, that FCC decision has been appealed by multiple parties. If those appeals are successfully, there could be additional regulatory burdens and additional costs placed on these services.


We may engage in acquisitions and other strategic transactions and the integration of such acquisitions and other strategic transactions could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.


Our business has grown significantly as a result of acquisitions, including the Acquisitions, which entail numerous risks including:


•distraction of our management team in identifying potential acquisition targets, conducting due diligence and negotiating acquisition agreements; 

•difficulties in integrating the operations, personnel, products, technologies and systems of acquired businesses; 

•difficulties in enhancing our customer support resources to adequately service our existing customers and the customers of acquired businesses; 

•the potential loss of key employees or customers of the acquired businesses; 

•unanticipated liabilities or contingencies of acquired businesses; 

•unbudgeted costs which we may incur in connection with pursuing potential acquisitions which are not consummated; 

•failure to achieve projected cost savings or cash flow from acquired businesses, which are based on projections that are inherently uncertain; 

•fluctuations in our operating results caused by incurring considerable expenses to acquire and integrate businesses before receiving the anticipated revenues expected to result from the acquisitions; and 

•difficulties in obtaining regulatory approvals required to consummate acquisitions.


We also participate in competitive bidding processes, some of which may involve significant cable systems. If we are the winning bidder in any such process involving significant cable systems or we otherwise engage in acquisitions or other strategic transactions in the future, we may incur additional debt, contingent liabilities and amortization expenses, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We could also issue substantial additional equity which could dilute existing stockholders.


If our acquisitions, including the Acquisitions and the integration of the Optimum and Suddenlink businesses, do not result in the anticipated operating efficiencies, are not effectively integrated, or result in costs which exceed our expectations, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.


Significant unanticipated increases in the use of bandwidth-intensive Internet-based services could increase our costs.


The rising popularity of bandwidth-intensive Internet-based services poses risks for our broadband services. Examples of such services include peer-to-peer file sharing services, gaming services and the delivery of video via streaming technology and by download. If heavy usage of bandwidth-intensive broadband services grows beyond our current expectations, we may need to incur more expenses than currently anticipated to expand the bandwidth capacity of our systems or our customers could have a suboptimal experience when using our broadband service. In order to continue to provide quality service at attractive prices, we need the continued flexibility to develop and refine business models that respond to changing consumer uses and demands and to manage bandwidth usage efficiently. Our ability to undertake such actions could be restricted by regulatory and legislative efforts to impose so-called "net neutrality" requirements on broadband communication providers like us that provide broadband services. For more information, see "Regulation—Broadband."


We operate in a highly competitive business environment which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.


We operate in a highly competitive, consumer-driven industry and we compete against a variety of broadband, pay television and telephony providers and delivery systems, including broadband communications companies, wireless data and telephony providers, satellite-delivered video signals, Internet-delivered video content and broadcast

Table of Contents  

television signals available to residential and business customers in our service areas. Some of our competitors include AT&T and its DirecTV subsidiary, CenturyLink, DISH Network, Frontier and Verizon. In addition, our pay television services compete with all other sources of leisure, news, information and entertainment, including movies, sporting or other live events, radio broadcasts, home-video services, console games, print media and the Internet.


In some instances, our competitors have fewer regulatory burdens, easier access to financing, greater resources, greater operating capabilities and efficiencies of scale, stronger brand-name recognition, longstanding relationships with regulatory authorities and customers, more subscribers, more flexibility to offer promotional packages at prices lower than ours and greater access to programming or other services. This competition creates pressure on our pricing and has adversely affected, and may continue to affect, our ability to add and retain customers, which in turn adversely affects our business, financial condition and results of operations. The effects of competition may also adversely affect our liquidity and ability to service our debt. For example, we face intense competition from Verizon and AT&T, which have network infrastructure throughout our service areas. We estimate that competitors are currently able to sell a fiber-based triple play, including broadband, pay television and telephony services, and may expand these and other service offerings to our potential customers.


Our competitive risks are heightened by the rapid technological change inherent in our business, evolving consumer preferences and the need to acquire, develop and adopt new technology to differentiate our products and services from those of our competitors, and to meet consumer demand. We may need to anticipate far in advance which technology we should use for the development of new products and services or the enhancement of existing products and services. The failure to accurately anticipate such changes may adversely affect our ability to attract and retain customers, which in turn could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Consolidation and cooperation in our industry may allow our competitors to acquire service capabilities or offer products that are not available to us or offer similar products and services at prices lower than ours. For example, Comcast and Charter Communications have agreed to jointly explore operational efficiencies to speed their respective entries into the wireless market, including in the areas of creating common operating platforms and emerging wireless technology platforms. In addition, changes in the regulatory and legislative environments may result in changes to the competitive landscape.


In addition, certain of our competitors own directly or are affiliated with companies that own programming content or have exclusive arrangements with content providers that may enable them to obtain lower programming costs or offer exclusive programming that may be attractive to prospective subscribers. For example, DirecTV has exclusive arrangements with the National Football League that give it access to programming we cannot offer. AT&T also has an agreement to acquire Time Warner, which owns a number of cable networks, including TBS, CNN and HBO, as well as Warner Bros. Entertainment, which produces television, film and home-video content. AT&T's and DirecTV's potential access to Time Warner programming could allow AT&T and DirecTV to offer competitive and promotional packages that could negatively affect our ability to maintain or increase our existing customers and revenues. DBS operators such as DISH Network and DirecTV also have marketing arrangements with certain phone companies in which the DBS provider's pay television services are sold together with the phone company's broadband and mobile and traditional phone services.


Most broadband communications companies, which already have wired networks, an existing customer base and other operational functions in place (such as billing and service personnel), offer DSL services. We believe DSL service competes with our broadband service and is often offered at prices lower than our Internet services. However, DSL is often offered at speeds lower than the speeds we offer. In addition, DSL providers may currently be in a better position to offer Internet services to businesses since their networks tend to be more complete in commercial areas. They may also increasingly have the ability to combine video services with telephone and Internet services offered to their customers, particularly as broadband communications companies enter into co-marketing agreements with other service providers. In addition, current and future fixed and wireless Internet services, such as 3G, 4G and 5G fixed and wireless broadband services and Wi-Fi networks, and devices such as wireless data cards, tablets and smartphones, and mobile wireless routers that connect to such devices, may compete with our broadband services.


Our telephony services compete directly with established broadband communications companies and other carriers, including wireless providers, as increasing numbers of homes are replacing their traditional telephone service with wireless telephone service. We also compete against VoIP providers like Vonage, Skype, GoogleTalk, Facetime,

Table of Contents  

WhatsApp and magicJack that do not own networks but can provide service to any person with a broadband connection, in some cases free of charge. In addition, we compete against ILECs, other CLECs and long-distance voice-service companies for large commercial and enterprise customers. While we compete with the ILECs, we also enter into interconnection agreements with ILECs so that our customers can make and receive calls to and from customers served by the ILECs and other telecommunications providers. Federal and state law and regulations require ILECs to enter into such agreements and provide facilities and services necessary for connection, at prices subject to regulation. The specific price, terms and conditions of each agreement, however, depend on the outcome of negotiations between us and each ILEC. Interconnection agreements are also subject to approval by the state regulatory commissions, which may arbitrate negotiation impasses. These agreements, like all interconnection agreements, are for limited terms and upon expiration are subject to renegotiation, potential arbitration and approval under the laws in effect at that time.


We also face competition for our advertising sales from traditional and non-traditional media outlets, including television and radio stations, traditional print media and the Internet.


We face significant risks as a result of rapid changes in technology, consumer expectations and behavior.


The broadband communications industry has undergone significant technological development over time and these changes continue to affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Such changes have had, and will continue to have, a profound impact on consumer expectations and behavior. Our video business faces technological change risks as a result of the continuing development of new and changing methods for delivery of programming content such as Internet-based delivery of movies, shows and other content which can be viewed on televisions, wireless devices and other developing mobile devices. Consumers' video consumption patterns are also evolving, for example, with more content being downloaded for time-shifted consumption. A proliferation of delivery systems for video content can adversely affect our ability to attract and retain subscribers and the demand for our services and it can also decrease advertising demand on our delivery systems. Our broadband business faces technological challenges from rapidly evolving wireless Internet solutions. Our telephony service offerings face technological developments in the proliferation of telephony delivery systems including those based on Internet and wireless delivery. If we do not develop or acquire and successfully implement new technologies, we will limit our ability to compete effectively for subscribers, content and advertising. We cannot provide any assurance that we will realize, in full or in part, the anticipated benefits we expect from the introduction of our home communications hub, Altice One, or that it will be rolled out across our footprint in the timeframe we anticipate. In addition, we may be required to make material capital and other investments to anticipate and to keep up with technological change. These challenges could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.




Table of Contents  

Our revenues and growth may be constrained due to demand exceeding capacity of our systems or our inability to develop solutions.


We anticipate generating revenues in the future from broadband connectivity, other Internet services, and broadband and in the cloud services. Demand and market acceptance for these recently introduced services and products delivered over the Internet is uncertain. Critical issues concerning the use of the Internet, such as ease of access, security, reliability, cost and quality of service, exist and may affect the growth of Internet use or the attractiveness of conducting commerce online. In addition, the Internet and online services may not be accepted as viable for a number of reasons, including potentially inadequate development of the necessary network infrastructure or delayed development of enabling technologies and performance improvements. To the extent that the Internet and online services continue to experience significant growth, there can be no assurance that the infrastructure of the Internet and online services will prove adequate to support increased user demands. In addition, the Internet or online services could lose their viability due to delays in the development or adoption of new standards and protocols required to handle increased levels of Internet or online service activity. Changes in, or insufficient availability of, telecommunications services to support the Internet or online services also could result in slower response times and adversely affect usage of the Internet and online services generally and us in particular. If use of the Internet and online services does not continue to grow or grows more slowly than expected, if the infrastructure for the Internet and online services does not effectively support growth that may occur, or if the Internet and online services do not become a viable commercial marketplace, our business could be adversely affected.


Certain aspects of our VoIP telephony services differ from traditional telephone service. The factors that may have this effect include:

  our subscribers may experience lower call quality than they experience with traditional wireline telephone companies, including static, echoes and transmission delays;
  our subscribers may experience higher dropped-call rates than they experience with traditional wireline telephone companies; and
  a power loss or Internet access interruption causes our service to be interrupted.


Additionally, our VoIP emergency calling service is significantly more limited than the emergency calling services offered by traditional telephone companies. Our VoIP emergency calling service can only transmit to a dispatcher at a public safety answering point, or PSAP, the location information that the subscriber has registered with us, which may at times be different from the actual location at the time of the call. As a result, our emergency calling systems may not assure that the appropriate PSAP is reached and may cause significant delays, or even failures, in callers’ receipt of emergency assistance. Our failure to develop or operate an adequate emergency calling service could subject us to substantial liabilities and may result in delays in subscriber adoption of our VoIP telephony services or all of our services, abandonment of our services by subscribers, and litigation costs, damage awards and negative publicity, any of which could harm our business, prospects, financial condition or results of operations.


If our subscribers do not accept the differences between our VoIP telephony services and traditional telephone service, they may not adopt or keep our VoIP telephony services or our other services, or may choose to retain or return to service provided by traditional telephone companies. Because VoIP telephony services represent an important aspect of our business strategy, failure to achieve subscribers’ acceptance of our VoIP telephony services may adversely affect our prospects, results of operations and the trading price of our shares.


We rely on contract manufacturers and a limited number of third party suppliers to produce our network equipment and to maintain our network sites. If these companies fail to perform, we may have a shortage of components and may be required to suspend our network deployment and our product and service introduction .


We depend on contract manufacturers, to produce and deliver acceptable, high quality products on a timely basis. We also depend on a limited number of third parties to maintain our network facilities. If our contract manufacturer or other providers do not satisfy our requirements, or if we lose our contract manufacturers or any other significant provider, we may have an insufficient network services for delivery to subscribers, we may be forced to suspend portions of our wireless broadband network, enrollment of new subscribers, and product sales and our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results may be harmed.


Table of Contents  

We rely on highly skilled executives and other personnel. If we cannot retain and motivate key personnel, we may be unable to implement our business strategy .  


We will be highly dependent on the scientific, technical, and managerial skills of certain key employees, including technical, research and development, sales, marketing, financial and executive personnel, and on our ability to identify, hire and retain additional personnel. To accommodate our current size and manage our anticipated growth, we must expand our employee base. Competition for key personnel, particularly persons having technical expertise, is intense, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to retain existing personnel or to identify or hire additional personnel. The need for such personnel is particularly important given the strains on our existing infrastructure and the need to anticipate the demands of future growth. In particular, we are highly dependent on the continued services of our senior management team, which currently is composed of a small number of individuals. We do not maintain key-man life insurance on the life of any employee. The inability of us to attract, hire or retain the necessary technical, sales, marketing, financial and executive personnel, or the loss of the services of any member of our senior management team, could have a material adverse effect on us.


Our future success depends largely on the expertise and reputation of our founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Stephen J. Thomas, Richard Eberhardt, and the other members of our senior management team. In addition, we intend to hire additional highly skilled individuals to staff our operations. Loss of any of our key personnel or the inability to recruit and retain qualified individuals could adversely affect our ability to implement our business strategy and operate our business.


We are currently managed by a small number of key management and operating personnel. Our future success depends, in part, on our ability to recruit and retain qualified personnel. Failure to do so likely would have an adverse impact on our business and the trading price of our common stock.


If our data security measures are breached, subscribers may perceive our network and services as not secure .


Our network security and the authentication of the subscriber’s credentials are designed to protect unauthorized access to data on our network. Because techniques used to obtain unauthorized access to or to sabotage networks change frequently and may not be recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate or implement adequate preventive measures against unauthorized access or sabotage. Consequently, unauthorized parties may overcome our encryption and security systems and obtain access to data on our network, including on a device connected to our network. In addition, because we operate and control our network and our subscribers’ Internet connectivity, unauthorized access or sabotage of our network could result in damage to our network and to the computers or other devices used by our subscribers. An actual or perceived breach of network security, regardless of whether the breach is our fault, could harm public perception of the effectiveness of our security measures, adversely affect our ability to attract and retain subscribers, expose us to significant liability and adversely affect our business prospects.


Our activities outside the United States could disrupt our operations .


We intend to invest in various international companies and spectrum opportunities through acquisitions and strategic alliances as these opportunities arise. Our activities outside the United States operate in environments different from the one we face in the United States, particularly with respect to competition and regulation. Due to these differences, our activities outside the United States may require a disproportionate amount of our management and financial resources, which could disrupt our U.S. operations and adversely affect our business.


In a number of international markets, we face substantial competition from local service providers that offer or may offer their own wireless broadband or VoIP telephony services and from other companies that provide Internet connectivity services. We may face heightened challenges in gaining market share, particularly in certain European countries, where a large portion of the population already has broadband Internet connectivity and incumbent companies already have a dominant market share in their service areas. Furthermore, foreign providers of competing services may have a substantial advantage over us in attracting subscribers due to a more established brand, greater knowledge of local subscribers’ preferences and access to significant financial or strategic resources.


Table of Contents  

In addition, foreign regulatory authorities frequently own or control the incumbent telecommunications companies operating under their jurisdiction. Established relationships between government-owned or government-controlled telecommunications companies and their traditional local providers of telecommunications services often limit access of third parties to these markets. The successful expansion of our international operations in some markets will depend on our ability to locate, form and maintain strong relationships with established local communication services and equipment providers. Failure to establish these relationships or to market or sell our products and services successfully could limit our ability to attract subscribers to our services.


We may be unable to protect our intellectual property, which could reduce the value of our services and our brand .


Our ability to compete effectively depends on our ability to protect our proprietary technologies, system designs and manufacturing processes. We may not be able to safeguard and maintain our proprietary rights. We rely on patents, trademarks and policies and procedures related to confidentiality to protect our intellectual property. Some of our intellectual property, however, is not covered by any of these protections.


We could be subject to claims that we have infringed on the proprietary rights of others, which claims would likely be costly to defend, could require us to pay damages and could limit our ability to use necessary technologies in the future .


Our competitors may independently develop or patent technologies or processes that are substantially equivalent or superior to ours. These competitors may claim that our services and products infringe on these patents or other proprietary rights. Defending against infringement claims, even merit less ones, would be time consuming, distracting and costly. If we are found to be infringing proprietary rights of a third party, we could be enjoined from using such third party’s rights and be required to pay substantial royalties and damages, and may no longer be able to use the intellectual property on acceptable terms or at all. Failure to obtain licenses to intellectual property could delay or prevent the development, manufacture or sale of our products or services and could cause us to expend significant resources to develop or acquire non-infringing intellectual property.


Our business depends on our brand, and if we do not maintain and enhance our brand, our ability to attract and retain subscribers may be impaired and our business and operating results harmed .


We believe that our brand is a critical part of our business. Maintaining and enhancing our brand may require us to make substantial investments with no assurance that these investments will be successful. If we fail to promote and maintain our brands , or if we incur significant expenses in this effort, our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition may be harmed. We anticipate that maintaining and enhancing our brand will become increasingly important, difficult and expensive.


We are subject to extensive regulation.


Our acquisition, lease, maintenance and use of spectrum licenses are extensively regulated by federal, state, local, and foreign governmental entities. A number of other federal, state, local and foreign privacy, security and consumer laws also apply to our business. These regulations and their application are subject to continual change as new legislation, regulations or amendments to existing regulations are adopted from time to time by governmental or regulatory authorities, including as a result of judicial interpretations of such laws and regulations. Current regulations directly affect the breadth of services we are able to offer and may impact the rates, terms and conditions of our services. Regulation of companies that offer competing services, such as cable and DSL providers and incumbent telecommunications carriers, also affects our business indirectly.


We are also subject to regulation because we provide VoIP telephony services. As an “interconnected” VoIP provider, we are required under FCC rules, to comply with the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, or CALEA, which requires service providers to build certain capabilities into their networks and to accommodate wiretap requests from law enforcement agencies.


In addition, the FCC or other regulatory authorities may in the future restrict our ability to manage subscribers’ use of our network, thereby limiting our ability to prevent or address subscribers’ excessive bandwidth demands. To maintain the quality of our network and user experience, we manage the bandwidth used by our subscribers’

Table of Contents  

applications, in part by restricting the types of applications that may be used over our network. Some providers and users of these applications have objected to this practice. If the FCC or other regulatory authorities were to adopt regulations that constrain our ability to employ bandwidth management practices, excessive use of bandwidth-intensive applications would likely reduce the quality of our services for all subscribers. Such decline in the quality of our services could harm our business.


In certain of our international markets, the services provided by our business may require receipt of a license from national, provincial or local regulatory authorities. Where required, regulatory authorities may have significant discretion in granting the licenses and in the term of the licenses, and are often under no obligation to renew the licenses when they expire.


The breach of a license or applicable law, even if inadvertent, can result in the revocation, suspension, cancellation or reduction in the term of a license or the imposition of fines. In addition, regulatory authorities may grant new licenses to third parties, resulting in greater competition in territories where we already have rights to licensed spectrum. In order to promote competition, licenses may also require that third parties be granted access to our bandwidth, frequency capacity, facilities or services. We may not be able to obtain or retain any required license, and we may not be able to renew a license on favorable terms, or at all.


Our wireless broadband and VoIP telephony services may become subject to greater state or federal regulation in the future. The scope of the regulations that may apply to VoIP telephony services providers and the impact of such regulations on providers’ competitive position are presently unknown.


Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is also our largest stockholder, and as a result he can exert control over us and has actual or potential interests that may diverge from yours.


Mr. Thomas may have interests that diverge from those of other holders of our common stock and he owns our super majority voting Series A stock. As a result, Mr. Thomas may vote the shares he owns or otherwise cause us to take actions that may conflict with your best interests as a stockholder, which could adversely affect our results of operations and the trading price of our common stock.


Through his control, Mr. Thomas can control our management, affairs and all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the approval of significant corporate transactions, a sale of our company, decisions about our capital structure and, the composition of our board of directors.




We can give no assurance of success or profitability to our investors.


We incurred losses for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 of $4,463,199 and $4,963,858, respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 of $2,130,562. Our cash flows from operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were negative $538,187 and $244,159, respectively. In order for us to continue as a going concern, we will need to obtain additional debt or equity financing, and look for companies with cash flow positive operations that we can acquire. There can be no assurance that we will be able to secure additional debt or equity financing, that we will be able to acquire cash flow positive operations, or that, if we are successful in any of those actions, those actions will produce adequate cash flow to enable us to meet all our future obligations. Most of our existing financing arrangements are short-term. If we are unable to obtain additional debt or equity financing, we may be required to significantly reduce or cease operations.


Our sources of capital are loans and sales of equity from common or preferred stock. We have no commitments for loans or equity sales at this date.


We may in the future issue more shares which could cause a loss of control by our present management and current stockholders.


We may issue further shares as consideration for the cash or assets or services out of our authorized but unissued common stock that would, upon issuance, represent a majority of the voting power and equity of our Company. The

Table of Contents  

result of such an issuance would be those new stockholders and management would control our Company, and persons unknown could replace our management at this time. Such an occurrence would result in a greatly reduced percentage of ownership of our Company by our current shareholders, which could present significant risks to investors.


We have options issued and outstanding which are convertible into our common stock. A conversion of such equity instruments could have a dilutive effect to existing shareholders.


At September 30, 2017, we had options issued and outstanding exercisable into 53,600 shares of our common stock at ranges from $0.046 to $0.22 per share. The options are all exercisable. The exercise of the options into shares of our common stock could have a dilutive effect to the holdings of our existing shareholders. There are no warrants outstanding.


Our officers and directors may have conflicts of interests as to corporate opportunities which we may not be able or allowed to participate in .


Presently there is no requirement contained in our Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws, or minutes which requires officers and directors of our business to disclose to us business opportunities which come to their attention. Our officers and directors do, however, have a fiduciary duty of loyalty to us to disclose to us any business opportunities which come to their attention, in their capacity as an officer and/or director or otherwise. Excluded from this duty would be opportunities which the person learns about through his involvement as an officer and director of another company. We have no intention of merging with or acquiring business opportunity from any affiliate or officer or director. (See “Conflicts of Interest” at page 75 )


We have agreed to indemnification of officers and directors as is provided by Florida Statutes.


Florida Statutes provide for the indemnification of our directors, officers, employees, and agents, under certain circumstances, against attorney’s fees and other expenses incurred by them in any litigation to which they become a party arising from their association with or activities our behalf. We will also bear the expenses of such litigation for any of our directors, officers, employees, or agents, upon such person’s promise to repay us therefore if it is ultimately determined that any such person shall not have been entitled to indemnification. This indemnification policy could result in substantial expenditures by us that we will be unable to recoup.


Our directors’ liability to us and shareholders is limited.


Florida Statutes exclude personal liability of our directors and our stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty except in certain specified circumstances. Accordingly, we will have a much more limited right of action against our directors that otherwise would be the case. This provision does not affect the liability of any director under federal or applicable state securities laws.


Our Stock prices in the Market may be volatile.


The value of our Common stock following this offering may be highly volatile and could be subject to fluctuations in price in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control. These factors include:

  quarterly variations in our results of operations or those of our competitors;
  announcements by us or our competitors of acquisitions, new products, significant contracts, commercial relationships or capital commitments;
  disruption to our operations or those of other sources critical to our network operations;
  the emergence of new competitors or new technologies;
  our ability to develop and market new and enhanced products on a timely basis;
  seasonal or other variations in our subscriber base;
  commencement of, or our involvement in, litigation;
  availability of additional spectrum;
  dilutive issuances of our stock or the stock of our subsidiaries, or the incurrence of additional debt;
Table of Contents  


  changes in our board or management;
  adoption of new or different accounting standards;
  changes in governmental regulations or in the status of our regulatory approvals;
  changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by securities analysts;
  announcements regarding WiMAX and other technical standards; and
  general economic conditions and slow or negative growth of related markets.


In addition, the stock market in general, and the market for shares of technology companies in particular, has experienced price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. We expect the value of our common stock will be subject to such fluctuations.


We may not be able to successfully implement our business strategy without substantial additional capital. Any such failure may adversely affect the business and results of operations.


Unless we can generate revenues sufficient to implement our Business Plan, we will need to obtain additional financing through debt or bank financing, or through the sale of shareholder interests to execute our Business Plan. We expect to need $34,000,000 in the next twelve months in capital or loans to complete our plans and operations. We may not be able to obtain this financing at all. We have not sought commitments for this financing, and we have no terms for either debt or equity financing, and we realize that it may be difficult to obtain on favorable terms. Moreover, if we issue additional equity securities to support our operations, Investor holdings may be diluted. Our business plans are at risk if we cannot continually achieve additional capital raising to complete our plans.


We are reliant, in part, on third party sales organizations, which may not perform as we expect.


We, from time to time rely on the sales force of third-party sales organizations with support from our own selling resources. The third-party relationships and internal organization are not fully developed at this time and must be developed. We may not be able to hire effective inside sales people to help our third-party sales organizations close sales. There is no assurance that any approaches will improve sales. Further, using only a direct sales force would be less cost-effective than our plan to use third-party sales organizations. In addition, a direct sales model may be ineffective if we were unable to hire and retain qualified salespeople and if the sales force fails to complete sales. Moreover, even if we successfully implement our business strategy, we may not have positive operating results. We may decide to alter or discontinue aspects of our business strategy and may adopt different strategies due to business or competitive factors.


Our growth may be affected adversely if our sales of products and services are negatively affected by competition or other factors.


The growth of our business is dependent, in large part, upon the development of sales for our services and product offerings. Market opportunities that we expect to exist may not develop as expected, or at all. For example, a substantial percentage of our service offerings is oriented around data access. If lower cost alternatives are developed, our sales would decrease and our operating results would be negatively affected. Moreover, even if market opportunities develop as expected, new technologies and services offerings introduced by competitors may significantly limit our ability to capitalize on any such market opportunity. Our failure to capitalize on expected market opportunities would adversely affect revenue growth.


The lack of operating history and the rapidly changing nature of the market in which we compete make it difficult to accurately forecast revenues and operating results. We anticipate that revenues and operating results might fluctuate in the future due to a number of factors including the following:


· the timing of sales for current services and products offerings
· the timing of new product implementations
· unexpected delays in introducing new services and products offerings
· increased expense related to sales and marketing, product development or administration
Table of Contents  
· the mix of products and our services offerings
· costs related to possible acquisitions of technology or business.
· costs of providing services


We may be unable to compete with larger, more established competitors.


The market for providing network delivered service solutions is competitive. We expect competition to intensify in the future. Many of our potential competitors have longer operating histories, larger customer bases, greater recognition and significantly greater resources. As a result, competitors may be able to respond more quickly to emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements than we can. The continuous and timely introduction of competitively priced services offerings into the market is critical to our success, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to introduce such services offerings. We may not be able to compete successfully against competitors, and the competitive pressures we face may have an adverse effect on our business.




We may not be able to protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights.


There can be no assurances that we will be able to obtain intellectual property protection that will effectively prevent any competitors from developing or marketing the same or a competing technology. In addition, we cannot predict whether we will be subject to intellectual property litigation the outcome of which is subject to uncertainty and which can be very costly to pursue or defend. We will attempt to continue to protect our proprietary designs and to avoid infringing on the intellectual property of third parties. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to protect our intellectual property or avoid suits by third parties claiming intellectual property infringement.


If our patents and other intellectual property rights do not adequately protect our service offering, we may lose market share to competitors and be unable to operate our business profitably.


Patents and other proprietary rights are anticipated to be of value to our future business, and our ability to compete effectively with other companies depends on the proprietary nature of our current or future technologies. We also rely upon trade secrets, know-how, continuing technological innovations and licensing opportunities to develop, maintain, and strengthen our competitive position. We cannot assure you that any future patent applications will result in issued patents, that any patents issued or licensed to us will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented or that the rights granted there under will provide a competitive advantage to us or prevent competitors from entering markets which we currently serve. Any required license may not be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all or may become invalid if the licensee’s right to such technology become challenged and/or revoked. In addition, some licenses may be non-exclusive, and therefore competitors may have access to the same technologies as we do. Furthermore, we may have to take legal action in the future to protect our trade secrets or know-how, or to defend them against claimed infringement of the rights of others. Any legal action of that type could be costly and time-consuming to us, and we cannot assure you that such actions will be successful. The invalidation of key patents or proprietary rights which we own or unsuccessful outcomes in lawsuits to protect our intellectual property may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.


We may in the future become subject to claims that some, or the entire service offering violates the patent or intellectual property rights of others, which could be costly and disruptive to us.


We operate in an industry that is susceptible to patent litigation. As a result, we or the parties we license technology from may become subject to patent infringement claims or litigation. Further, one or more of our future patents or applications may become subject to interference proceedings declared by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, (“USPTO”) or the foreign equivalents thereof to determine the priority of claims to inventions. The defense of intellectual property suits, USPTO interference proceedings or the foreign equivalents thereof, as well as related legal and administrative proceedings, are both costly and time consuming and may divert management's attention from other business concerns. An adverse determination in litigation or interference proceedings to which we may become a party could, among other things:



Any of these outcomes could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.


Our stock will in all likelihood be thinly traded and as a result you may be unable to sell at or near ask prices or at all if you need to liquidate your shares.


The shares of our common stock may be thinly-traded on the OTC Market, meaning that the number of persons interested in purchasing our common shares at or near ask prices at any given time may be relatively small or non-existent. This situation is attributable to a number of factors, including the fact that we are a small company which is relatively unknown to stock analysts, stock brokers, institutional investors and others in the investment community that generate or influence sales volume, and that even if we came to the attention of such persons, they tend to be risk-averse and would be reluctant to follow an unproven, early stage company such as ours or purchase or recommend the purchase of any of our Securities until such time as we became more seasoned and viable. As a consequence, there may be periods of several days or more when trading activity in our Securities is minimal or non-existent, as compared to a seasoned issuer which has a large and steady volume of trading activity that will generally support continuous sales without an adverse effect on Securities price. We cannot give you any assurance that a broader or more active public trading market for our common Securities will develop or be sustained, or that any trading levels will be sustained. Due to these conditions, we can give investors no assurance that they will be able to sell their shares at or near ask prices or at all if they need money or otherwise desire to liquidate their securities of our Company.


The regulation of penny stocks by SEC and FINRA may discourage the tradability of our securities.


We are a “penny stock” company. None of our securities currently trade in any market and, if ever available for trading, will be subject to a Securities and Exchange Commission rule that imposes special sales practice requirements upon broker-dealers who sell such securities to persons other than established customers or accredited investors. For purposes of the rule, the phrase “accredited investors” means, in general terms, institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000, or individuals having a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or having an annual income that exceeds $200,000 (or that, when combined with a spouse’s income, exceeds $300,000). For transactions covered by the rule, the broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction prior to the sale. Effectively, this discourages broker-dealers from executing trades in penny stocks. Consequently, the rule will affect the ability of purchasers in this offering to sell their securities in any market that might develop therefore because it imposes additional regulatory burdens on penny stock transactions.


In addition, the Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted a number of rules to regulate “penny stocks". Such rules include Rules 3a51-1, 15g-1, 15g-2, 15g-3, 15g-4, 15g-5, 15g-6, 15g-7, and 15g-9 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Because our securities constitute “penny stocks” within the meaning of the rules, the rules would apply to us and to our securities. The rules will further affect the ability of owners of shares to sell our securities in any market that might develop for them because it imposes additional regulatory burdens on penny stock transactions.


Shareholders should be aware that, according to Securities and Exchange Commission, the market for penny stocks has suffered in recent years from patterns of fraud and abuse. Such patterns include (i) control of the market for the security by one or a few broker-dealers that are often related to the promoter or issuer; (ii) manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of purchases and sales and false and misleading press releases; (iii) “boiler room” practices involving high-pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price projections by inexperienced sales persons; (iv) excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differentials and markups by selling broker-dealers; and (v) the wholesale dumping of the same securities by promoters and broker-dealers after prices have been manipulated to a desired consequent investor losses. Our management is aware of the abuses that have occurred historically in the penny stock market. Although we do not expect to be in a position to dictate the behavior of the market or of broker-

Table of Contents  

dealers who participate in the market, management will strive within the confines of practical limitations to prevent the described patterns from being established with respect to our securities.


Inventory in penny stocks have limited remedies in the event of violations of penny stock rules. While the courts are always available to seek remedies for fraud against us, most, if not all, brokerages require their customers to sign mandatory arbitration agreements in conjunctions with opening trading accounts. Such arbitration may be through an independent arbiter. Investors may file a complaint with FINRA against the broker allegedly at fault, and FINRA may be the arbiter, under FINRA rules. Arbitration rules generally limit discovery and provide more expedient adjudication, but also provide limited remedies in damages usually only the actual economic loss in the account. Investors should understand that if a fraud case is filed against a company in the courts it may be vigorously defended and may take years and great legal expenses and costs to pursue, which may not be economically feasible for small investors.


That absent arbitration agreements, specific legal remedies available to investors of penny stocks include the following:


If a penny stock is sold to the investor in violation of the requirements listed above, or other federal or states securities laws, the investor may be able to cancel the purchase and receive a refund of the investment.


If a penny stock is sold to the investor in a fraudulent manner, the investor may be able to sue the persons and firms that committed the fraud for damages.


The fact that we are a penny stock company will cause many brokers to refuse to handle transactions in the stocks, and may discourage trading activity and volume, or result in wide disparities between bid and ask prices. These may cause investors significant illiquidity of the stock at a price at which they may wish to sell or in the opportunity to complete a sale. Investors will have no effective legal remedies for these illiquidity issues.


We will pay no dividends in the foreseeable future .


We have not paid dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate paying such dividends in the foreseeable future.


Rule 144 sales in the future may have a depressive effect on our stock price.


All of the outstanding shares of common stock held by our present officers, directors, and affiliate stockholders are “restricted securities” within the meaning of Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. As restricted Shares, these shares may be resold only pursuant to an effective registration statement or under the requirements of Rule 144 or other applicable exemptions from registration under the Act and as required under applicable state securities laws. Rule 144 provides in essence that a person who has held restricted securities for six months, under certain conditions, sell every three months, in brokerage transactions, a number of shares that does not exceed the greater of 1.0% of a company’s outstanding common stock or the average weekly trading volume during the four calendar weeks prior to the sale. There is no limit on the amount of restricted securities that may be sold by a non-affiliate after the owner has held the restricted securities for a period of six month. A sale under Rule 144 or under any other exemption from the Act, if available, or pursuant to subsequent registration of shares of common stock of present stockholders, may have a depressive effect upon the price of the common stock in any market that may develop.


Any sales of our common stock, if in significant amounts, are likely to depress the future market price of our securities.


Assuming all of the shares of common stock held by the selling security holders registered hereby are sold, we would have 36,953,025 new shares that are freely tradable and therefor available for sale, in market or private transactions.


Unrestricted sales of 36,953,025 shares of stock by our selling stockholders could have a huge negative impact on our share price, and the market for our shares.

Table of Contents  


Any new potential investors will suffer a disproportionate risk and there will be immediate dilution of existing investor’s investments.


Our present shareholders have acquired their securities at a cost significantly less than that which the investors purchasing pursuant to shares will pay for their stock holdings or at which future purchasers in the market may pay. Therefore, any new potential investors will bear most of the risk of loss.


We can issue shares of preferred stock without shareholder approval, which could adversely affect the rights of common shareholders.


Our Articles of Incorporation permit our Board of Directors to establish the rights, privileges, preferences and restrictions, including voting rights, of future series of stock and to issue such stock without approval from our shareholders. The rights of holders of common stock may suffer as a result of the rights granted to holders of preferred stock that may be issued in the future. In addition, we could issue preferred stock to prevent a change in control of our Company, depriving common shareholders of an opportunity to sell their stock at a price in excess of the prevailing market price.


We will become a reporting company upon the effectiveness of this registration statement.


We will become subject to the reporting requirements under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, Section 13a, after the effectiveness of this offering, pursuant to Section 15d of the Securities Act and we intend to be registered under Section 12(g). As a result, shareholders will have access to the information required to be reported by publicly held companies under the Exchange Act and the regulations thereunder. As a result, we will be subject to legal and accounting expenses that private companies are not subject to and this could affect our ability to generate operating income.




We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares being registered on behalf of our selling shareholders.


We may raise additional funds through a placement of shares of our common stock. At this time, there is no committed source for such funds and we cannot give any assurances of being able to raise such funds. We will require additional funds to carry out our business plan. The availability and terms of any future financing will depend on market and other conditions.


The monies we have raised thus far from private placements to our current Shareholders is anticipated to be sufficient to pay all expenses of this registration statement, which is estimated to be $175,000.




We have a limited established market for our common stock in OTC Pink Sheets under the symbol “TPTG.”


Our selling shareholders plan to sell shares at market prices, at such prices as the market may dictate from time to time or in private transactions.


Title Per Share
Common Stock $0. 15


* 5 day average closing price preceding filing of this Registration Statement


As of September 30, 2017, there were 136,953,904 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.


The market share price likely bears no relationship to any criteria of goodwill value, asset value, market price or any other measure of value.


Table of Contents  



The following table sets forth with respect to existing shares being offered and under this registration, the number of our shares of common stock offered by shareholders, the percentage ownership of such shares, the total consideration paid, the percentage of total consideration paid and the average price per share. All percentages are computed based upon cumulative shares and consideration assuming sale of all shares in the line item as compared to maximum in each previous line.


  Shares Purchased and being offered for resale  
  Number Percent (1) Price/Share
Existing Shareholders whose shares are being registered 36,953,025 26.98 % $0. 15
(1) Percentage relates to total percentage of shares to be registered for existing shareholders.
(2) Percentage relates to total percentage of capital raised post offering.


“Net tangible book value” is the amount that results from subtracting the total liabilities and intangible assets from the total assets of an entity. Dilution occurs because we determined the offering price based on factors other than those used in computing book value of our stock. Dilution exists because the book value of shares held by existing stockholders is lower than the offering price offered to new investors.


As at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the net tangible book value of our stock was ($0.014) and $0.002 per share, respectively.




The selling shareholders obtained their shares of our stock in the following transactions:


Number of Shares Original Consideration Issue Price Per Share
2,000,000 Founders Services $0.001
10,821,250 Asset Acquisition $0.10 to $0.81
2,983,380 Conversion of Convertible Promissory Notes $0.20 to $0.80
4,278,496 Private Placement $0.10 to $0.50
8,876,649 Services $0.10 to $0.30
4,005,217 Prior Ally Pharma $0.001
3,9 88,033 Gifts to Family $0.001


Other than the stock transactions discussed above, we have not entered into any transaction nor are there any proposed transactions in which any founder, director, executive officer, significant shareholder of our company or any member of the immediate family of any of the foregoing had or is to have a direct or indirect material interest.


No person who may, in the future, be considered a promoter of this offering, will receive or expect to receive assets, services or other considerations from us except those persons who are our salaried employees or directors. No assets will be, nor expected to be, acquired from any promoter on behalf of us. We have not entered into any agreements that require disclosure to the shareholders.

Table of Contents  


(a) All of the securities listed below are being registered in this Registration Statement.



  Common Shares Held Common Shares % Owned Shares Owned % Owned
  By Each Shareholder To Be Before After After
Name Before Offering Registered Offering Offering Offering
ANDY NEAL                                            180                                180 0.00%                             -    0.00%
ARTHUR BRANDING                                         1,000                            1,000 0.00%                             -    0.00%
BERNIE KARNS                                       12,500                          12,500 0.01%                             -    0.00%
BERTRAM E. CUTLER                                               19                                  19 0.00%                             -    0.00%
BREANNE ROJESKI                                            200                                200 0.00%                             -    0.00%
CAROLS ADAMICK MENDOZA                                    100,000                        100,000 0.07%                             -    0.00%
CASH CUTLER                                                 4                                    4 0.00%                             -    0.00%
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS                                         5,200                            5,200 0.00%                             -    0.00%
DALE FINCK                                         1,000                            1,000 0.00%                             -    0.00%
DANIEL WROBLESKI                                            800                                800 0.00%                             -    0.00%
FREDERICK EBERHARDT (5)                                    615,000                        615,000 0.45%                             -    0.00%
GUADALUPE SILVA                                         9,350                            9,350 0.01%                             -    0.00%
HAYDEN F. BELLAMY                                       10,000                          10,000 0.01%                             -    0.00%
J WINSTON MICHAEL TRAVIS OLSON                                         1,000                            1,000 0.00%                             -    0.00%
JAMES D. AND KAREN G. SCHINDLER JTWROS                                         1,000                            1,000 0.00%                             -    0.00%
JEFF OLSEN                                    339,166                        339,166 0.25%                             -    0.00%
JOHN BENDLE                                         2,000                            2,000 0.00%                             -    0.00%
KATHI OLSON                                       10,000                          10,000 0.01%                             -    0.00%
KRISTEN REDETTE OLSON                                         1,000                            1,000 0.00%                             -    0.00%
LOUIS ELLIOTT                                         1,000                            1,000 0.00%                             -    0.00%
MARISOL SCHLEMMER                                       21,000                          21,000 0.02%                             -    0.00%
MICHAEL EMMERS                                    135,000                        135,000 0.10%                             -    0.00%
ROBERT A PUTT                                         2,000                            2,000 0.00%                             -    0.00%
ROBERT ANDREWS                                         1,000                            1,000 0.00%                             -    0.00%
SHERRY ORSBORN                                         7,500                            7,500 0.01%                             -    0.00%
SUSAN ELLSWORTH                                            400                                400 0.00%                             -    0.00%
SUSAN ROLL REVOCABLE TRUST                                    500,000                        500,000 0.37%                             -    0.00%
THOMAS B. SEITER                                         1,000                            1,000 0.00%                             -    0.00%
TONI GIGLIOTTI                                            200                                200 0.00%                             -    0.00%
Table of Contents  


BRIAN POWERS                                    500,000                        500,000 0.37%                             -    0.00%
KN SOLOMON MBAGWU                                 2,000,000                    2,000,000 1.46%                             -    0.00%
EDDIE BAKER                                                 4                                    4 0.00%                             -    0.00%
JUAN C. FERNANDEZ                                       12,500                          12,500 0.01%                             -    0.00%
KHALID S. DAOUD                                         5,000                            5,000 0.00%                             -    0.00%
KOKI NAGASHIMA                                       18,544                          18,544 0.01%                             -    0.00%
LUI CHI HO RONALD                                            174                                174 0.00%                             -    0.00%
MANUEL FERNANDEZ                                            550                                550 0.00%                             -    0.00%
SHINICHRO GOTO                                                 6                                    6 0.00%                             -    0.00%
MATTHEW MCCRIMMON                                    715,000                        715,000 0.52%                             -    0.00%
PRAISE DIRECT HOLDINGS LIMITED                                         1,000                            1,000 0.00%                             -    0.00%
SHEN TIAOJUAN                                            200                                200 0.00%                             -    0.00%
THOMAS MCCRIMMON IV                                 1,565,454                                   -    1.14%              1,565,454 1.14%
ARLENA FARINAS                                            300                                300 0.00%                             -    0.00%
CHIUWAI SITU                                            400                                400 0.00%                             -    0.00%
DAVID PINTO                                            200                                200 0.00%                             -    0.00%
FRANCES MCCRIMMON                                 3,294,805                    2,000,000 2.41%              1,294,805 0.95%
SCOTT THOMAS                                                 4                                    4 0.00%                             -    0.00%
MARK ROWAN                                 6,500,000                    2,000,000 4.75%              4,500,000 3.29%
TODD WIGINGTON                                       16,492                          16,492 0.01%                             -    0.00%
RICHARD EBERHARDT (2)(4)                               19,000,000                    2,000,000 13.87%           17,000,000 12.41%
GARY COOK (2)(4)                                 6,500,000                    2,000,000 4.75%              4,500,000 3.29%
RUSSELL WILLIAMS                                 7,500,000                    2,000,000 5.48%              5,500,000 4.02%
STACIE STRICKER (2)(4)                                    500,000                        500,000 0.37%                             -    0.00%
STEPHEN J. THOMAS, III (2)(4)                               42,493,073                    2,000,000 31.03%           40,493,073 29.57%
SCOTT GOODWIN                                       50,000                          50,000 0.04%                             -    0.00%
ERIK VERDUZCO                                       75,954                          75,954 0.06%                             -    0.00%
GABRIEL BARBARENA                                       75,954                          75,954 0.06%                             -    0.00%
KAROL AND FAYAD PALOS                                    151,907                        151,907 0.11%                             -    0.00%
SUE BERRY                                       50,000                          50,000 0.04%                             -    0.00%
CHAD EUMURA                                       50,000                          50,000 0.04%                             -    0.00%
LOUIE SAENZ                                       75,954                          75,954 0.06%                             -    0.00%
MARIA DOLORES NICHOLS                                    151,907                        151,907 0.11%                             -    0.00%
MIGUEL MEDINA                                    151,907                        151,907 0.11%                             -    0.00%
Table of Contents  


OFELIA DE LA TORRE                                    197,480                        197,480 0.14%                             -    0.00%
PAUL JULIEN                                       75,954                          75,954 0.06%                             -    0.00%
RAMSES ACOSTA                                    151,907                        151,907 0.11%                             -    0.00%
ROLANDO NICHOLS                                 1,729,224                    1,729,224 1.26%                             -    0.00%
JAMIE HERNANDEZ                                    100,000                        100,000 0.07%                             -    0.00%
LINDA KELLY                                 1,000,000                    1,000,000 0.73%                             -    0.00%
QUYNTWAN HENRY                                    100,000                        100,000 0.07%                             -    0.00%
DUANE JACKSON                                    500,000                        500,000 0.37%                             -    0.00%
ENOCH BRANDE                                    500,000                        500,000 0.37%                             -    0.00%
CANE INDUSTRIES LLC                                       50,000                          50,000 0.04%                             -    0.00%
PENNY PROS LLC                                       50,000                          50,000 0.04%                             -    0.00%
SEO STRADEGY GROUP                                    450,000                        450,000 0.33%                             -    0.00%
JOYCE EARLY                                         5,000                            5,000 0.00%                             -    0.00%
NATALIE WASHCO                                         5,000                            5,000 0.00%                             -    0.00%
BRIAN KENT                                    265,950                        265,950 0.19%                             -    0.00%
KAREN KENT                                    243,225                        243,225 0.18%                             -    0.00%
MARIO PENA                                 2,000,000                        750,000 1.46%              1,250,000 0.91%
CARLOS ANDRES CASTRO                                         5,000                            5,000 0.00%                             -    0.00%
CONRAD CALDERON                                       10,000                          10,000 0.01%                             -    0.00%
DELIA DEOQUINO                                       10,000                          10,000 0.01%                             -    0.00%
LIZETTE CALDERON                                    150,000                        150,000 0.11%                             -    0.00%
SHARON DARRAH                                       20,000                          20,000 0.01%                             -    0.00%
ANDY DOUGHTY                                       60,000                          60,000 0.04%                             -    0.00%
BRUNO BARBARAI                                       50,000                          50,000 0.04%                             -    0.00%
CARLETON GREGORY SOLLOWAY                                    250,000                        250,000 0.18%                             -    0.00%
CAROL JOANNE BOOTH                                    100,000                        100,000 0.07%                             -    0.00%
CECIL JONES                                       32,000                          32,000 0.02%                             -    0.00%
CELESTE JANET FITZPATRICK                                       21,000                          21,000 0.02%                             -    0.00%
CRAIG FULLER                                    150,000                        150,000 0.11%                             -    0.00%
CRAIG HILL                                    100,000                        100,000 0.07%                             -    0.00%
DAVID WARD                                       75,000                          75,000 0.05%                             -    0.00%
DEBORAH MILLER                                         2,000                            2,000 0.00%                             -    0.00%
DENNI GRIFFITH                                         5,000                            5,000 0.00%                             -    0.00%
EMILIANO BONANNO                                    155,000                        155,000 0.11%                             -    0.00%
FEIVEL INVESTMENT LLC                                       30,000                          30,000 0.02%                             -    0.00%
Table of Contents  


GARY STEWART                                       20,000                          20,000 0.01%                             -    0.00%
GRANT HENRY                                       10,000                          10,000 0.01%                             -    0.00%
HOLLY MEAD                                       55,000                          55,000 0.04%                             -    0.00%
JEBB DYKSRA                                       75,000                          75,000 0.05%                             -    0.00%
JOE OBEZO                                         5,000                            5,000 0.00%                             -    0.00%
KONSTANTIN SHAPOVALOV                                       10,000                          10,000 0.01%                             -    0.00%
KRISSY BARLOW TAYLOR                                       50,000                          50,000 0.04%                             -    0.00%
LAURIE L POWER                                       10,000                          10,000 0.01%                             -    0.00%
LUIS ALBERTO SANZ                                 1,765,742                        0 1.29%              1, 7 65,742 1.29 %
MARIO SCADE GARCIA                                       25,000                          25,000 0.02%                             -    0.00%
MARLA ELLERMAN                                       50,000                          50,000 0.04%                             -    0.00%
NORMAN BRANDER                                                 5                                    5 0.00%                             -    0.00%
PANTHEON PARTNERS                                    200,000                        200,000 0.15%                             -    0.00%
PATRICK TAYLOR                                       10,000                          10,000 0.01%                             -    0.00%
REGGIE THOMAS (6)                                    165,000                        165,000 0.12%                             -    0.00%
CHARLES GREGORY THOMAS (6)                                                 8                                    8 0.00%                             -    0.00%
CHARLES R. THOMAS (6)                                                 6                                    6 0.00%                             -    0.00%
WIE FAMILY TRUST                                                 5                                    5 0.00%                             -    0.00%
RIGO FLORES                                       10,000                          10,000 0.01%                             -    0.00%
ROBERT GOOLD                                    100,000                        100,000 0.07%                             -    0.00%
RUDOLF EDUARD BOHLI                                    500,000                        500,000 0.37%                             -    0.00%
SANFORD LEAVENWORTH                                         8,000                            8,000 0.01%                             -    0.00%
SHIGETOMI KOMATSU                                                 9                                    9 0.00%                             -    0.00%
SHANNON JOHNSON                                    350,000                        350,000 0.26%                             -    0.00%
STEPHANIE KRAUSE                                       88,000                          88,000 0.06%                             -    0.00%
THOMAS J. POWERS                                       12,000                          12,000 0.01%                             -    0.00%
TOM SHAEFFER                                    300,000                        300,000 0.22%                             -    0.00%
WARREN WINFIELD GIBSON III                                    100,000                        100,000 0.07%                             -    0.00%
YU CHUNG CHO                                    500,000                        500,000 0.37%                             -    0.00%
BRIAN MICHAEL FIELDING                                       15,035                          15,035 0.01%                             -    0.00%
ANDY ELLISON                                    100,000                        100,000 0.07%                             -    0.00%
SHELLY FULTON                                    250,000                        250,000 0.18%                             -    0.00%
BRADEN SCHUSTER                                    100,000                        100,000 0.07%                             -    0.00%
AARON D CLARK                                    282,459                        282,459 0.21%                             -    0.00%
BENJAMIN AMMONS                                         8,764                            8,764 0.01%                             -    0.00%
Table of Contents  


BROWN LIVING TRUST                                       16,492                          16,492 0.01%                             -    0.00%
CAPITAL-PLUS PARTNERS                                    333,422                        333,422 0.24%                             -    0.00%
CHRISTIAN A. MASSETTI                                       32,500                          32,500 0.02%                             -    0.00%
CHRISTOPHER J. GAVIGAN                                       20,330                          20,330 0.01%                             -    0.00%
CHRISTOPHER SHIPPY G CANTON                                       65,967                          65,967 0.05%                             -    0.00%
CINDY ARMSTRONG                                    125,000                        125,000 0.09%                             -    0.00%
CLEAR VIEW COMMUNICATIONS                                       40,000                          40,000 0.03%                             -    0.00%
CONEXUS TELECOM                                    125,000                        125,000 0.09%                             -    0.00%
CRITICAL SYSTEMS & SUPPORT LTD                                       13,476                          13,476 0.01%                             -    0.00%
DAVID CLARK                                         8,246                            8,246 0.01%                             -    0.00%
DON & BRENDA MORRIS JT TEN                                         3,298                            3,298 0.00%                             -    0.00%
DOUGLAS R PETERLIN                                         9,616                            9,616 0.01%                             -    0.00%
EDWARD DAVIS                                       30,000                          30,000 0.02%                             -    0.00%
EQUITY TRUST COMPANY, CUSTODIAN FBO KARL M CRISS IRA                                         4,383                            4,383 0.00%                             -    0.00%
FORESIGHT GROUP LLC                                    150,000                        150,000 0.11%                             -    0.00%
FRED T DAVIS, JR.                                       20,000                          20,000 0.01%                             -    0.00%
GARY AND JAMIE GORDON JT                                         7,499                            7,499 0.01%                             -    0.00%
GAYLE SETZER                                       50,025                          50,025 0.04%                             -    0.00%
GRANT EVANS                                         3,298                            3,298 0.00%                             -    0.00%
GREG DREW                                         3,298                            3,298 0.00%                             -    0.00%
GREGG MASSETTI                                       10,231                          10,231 0.01%                             -    0.00%
HAL CLARK                                       21,116                          21,116 0.02%                             -    0.00%
IRA HUGHES                                       16,492                          16,492 0.01%                             -    0.00%
JASON DUNCAN                                       16,492                          16,492 0.01%                             -    0.00%
JIM RICHARDS                                       14,500                          14,500 0.01%                             -    0.00%
JOELLE CLARK                                    167,541                        167,541 0.12%                             -    0.00%
JOHN DREW                                    111,649                        111,649 0.08%                             -    0.00%
JOHN P. WARD                                       36,803                          36,803 0.03%                             -    0.00%
JOSEPH LAWRENCE HAGER                                       20,330                          20,330 0.01%                             -    0.00%
JOSH HITT                                         9,525                            9,525 0.01%                             -    0.00%
KIM KELLAR                                         4,123                            4,123 0.00%                             -    0.00%
LISA & DOUG COOPER JT                                       10,956                          10,956 0.01%                             -    0.00%
M-CUBE CORPORATION                                                 6                                    6 0.00%                             -    0.00%
MARK CLARK                                         3,298                            3,298 0.00%                             -    0.00%
MARK MONTANO                                    251,649                        251,649 0.18%                             -    0.00%
Table of Contents  


MARK PALUSO                                    100,000                        100,000 0.07%                             -    0.00%
MICHAEL FLEMING (3)                                    181,953                        181,953 0.13%                             -    0.00%
MICHAEL P MURPHY                                 1,541,949                    1,541,949 1.13%                             -    0.00%
NICK MULHOLLAND                                       75,000                          75,000 0.05%                             -    0.00%
NICOLE & ERIC CARTER JT TEN                                         3,298                            3,298 0.00%                             -    0.00%
PAUL E. KNAG                                       15,035                          15,035 0.01%                             -    0.00%
PLANET ONE COMMUNICATIONS INC.                                    150,000                        150,000 0.11%                             -    0.00%
ROBERT RICCI                                       11,108                          11,108 0.01%                             -    0.00%
ROBERT SCHUSTER                                    100,000                        100,000 0.07%                             -    0.00%
ROBERT SETZER (3)                                    126,120                        126,120 0.09%                             -    0.00%
RON A. LEVENE                                       82,767                          82,767 0.06%                             -    0.00%
TERRY BRODKIN                                    110,000                        110,000 0.08%                             -    0.00%
THE MANGIA FAMILY TRUST U/A DTD 01/12/16                                         3,298                            3,298 0.00%                             -    0.00%
TRAVIS CLARK                                         4,123                            4,123 0.00%                             -    0.00%
STEVE CAUDLE                                 4,000,000                    2,000,000 2.92%              2,000,000 1.46%
CHRIS COPELAND                                       12,675                          12,675 0.01%                             -    0.00%
DAVID I NEWMAN REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST                                 1,000,000                    1,000,000 0.73%                             -    0.00%
INVESTMENT REAL ESTATE                                         2,500                            2,500 0.00%                             -    0.00%
KERRY J. NEAL                                         5,000                            5,000 0.00%                             -    0.00%
MITSUNOBU AMAZAKI                                                 6                                    6 0.00%                             -    0.00%
PATRICK GUIANT                                       55,200                          55,200 0.04%                             -    0.00%
ROB JENKS                                       38,025                          38,025 0.03%                             -    0.00%
ROBERT JAMES SHUBERT                                         2,500                            2,500 0.00%                             -    0.00%
RON MONARK                                    125,400                        125,400 0.09%                             -    0.00%
EDWARD WILLIS LEVERT JR.                                    250,000                        250,000 0.18%                             -    0.00%
XROADS LLC                                       10,000                          10,000 0.01%                             -    0.00%
    36,953,025   100,100,634  



(1) Based upon 136,953,904 shares of common stock issued and outstanding at December 1, 2017. Certain shareholders not included in total above due to small amounts.
(2) Officer and/or director of our Company.
(3) The individuals have voting control for the entities noted in the list below (b).
(4) We are registering a total of 6,500,000 shares in which our officers/directors are considered to have beneficial ownership.
(5) Are the family members of Richard Eberhardt, officer and a Director of our Company, but not dependents and he disclaims any ownership or control of such shares.
(6) Are the family members of Stephen J. Thomas, III, officer and a Director of our Company, but not dependents and he disclaims any ownership or control of such shares.
Table of Contents  


Other than the material relationships, discussed above, the listed selling security holders have not had a material relationship with the registrant.


(b) The table below shows the person with voting control for the entities listed in (a) above.




Cane Industries, LLC

Chris Cane 50,000 No
Capital-Plus Partners Robert Setzer 333,422 No
Clear View Communications William Maloney 40,000 No
Conexus Telecom Jonathan Fink 125,000 No
Critical Systems & Support Ltd. Michael Fleming 13,476 No
Feivel Investment, LLC Ethan Luu 30,000 No
Foresight Group, LLC Robert Fabrizio 150,000 No
Investment Real Estate Unknown 2,500 No
M-Cube Corporation Unknown 6 No
Pantheon Partners Renee Morentine 200,000 No
Penny Pros, LLC Sean Ryan 50,000 No
Planet One Communications, Inc. Ted Schuman 150,000 No
Praise Direct Holdings Limited Unknown 1,000 No
SEO Stradegy Group Jay Scorakaw 450,000 No
XROADS, LLC Unknown 10,000 No




Upon effectiveness of this amendment to the registration statement, of which this prospectus is a part, our existing selling shareholders may sell their securities at market prices or at any price in privately negotiated transactions.


Our selling shareholders may be deemed underwriters in this offering.


The selling shareholders are not paying any of the offering expenses and we will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of the shares by the selling shareholders.




The securities being registered and/or offered by this Prospectus are common shares.


Common Stock


We are presently authorized to issue one billion (1,000,000,000) shares of our $0.001 par value common stock. A total of One Hundred Thirty Six Million, Nine Hundred Fifty Three Thousand, Nine Hundred Four (136,953,904) common shares are issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2017.


Common Shares


All common shares are equal to each other with respect to voting, liquidation, and dividend rights. Special shareholders' meetings may be called by the officers or director, or upon the request of holders of at least one-tenth (1/10th) of the outstanding shares. Holders of shares are entitled to one vote at any shareholders' meeting for each share they own as of the record date fixed by the board of directors. There is no quorum requirement for

Table of Contents  

shareholders' meetings. Therefore, a vote of the majority of the shares represented at a meeting will govern even if this is substantially less than a majority of the shares outstanding. Holders of shares are entitled to receive such dividends as may be declared by the board of directors out of funds legally available therefore, and upon liquidation are entitled to participate pro rata in a distribution of assets available for such a distribution to shareholders. There are no conversion, pre-emptive or other subscription rights or privileges with respect to any shares. Reference is made to our Articles of Incorporation and our By-Laws as well as to the applicable statutes of the State of Florida for a more complete description of the rights and liabilities of holders of shares. It should be noted that the board of directors without notice to the shareholders may amend the By-Laws. Our shares do not have cumulative voting rights, which means that the holders of more than fifty percent (50%) of the shares voting for election of directors may elect all the directors if they choose to do so. In such event, the holders of the remaining shares aggregating less than fifty percent (50%) of the shares voting for election of directors may not be able to elect any director.


Preferred shares


As of September 30, 2017, we had authorized one hundred million (100,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock, of which certain shares had been designated as Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock.


Series A Convertible Preferred Stock


In February 2015, we designated 1,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock as Series A Preferred Stock.


The Series A Preferred Stock was designated in February 2015, has a par value of $.001, is senior to any other class or series of outstanding Preferred Stock or Common Stock and does not bear dividends. The Series A Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference immediately after any Senior Securities, as defined, and of an amount equal to $100 per share. Holders of the Series A Preferred Stock shall, collectively have the right to convert all of their Series A Preferred Stock when conversion is elected into that number of shares of Common Stock of our Company, determined by the following formula: 60% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares as computed immediately after the transaction for conversion. For further clarification, the 60% of the issued and outstanding common shares includes what the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock may already hold in common shares at the time of conversion. The Series A Preferred Stock, collectively, shall have the right to vote as if converted prior to the vote to an amount of shares equal to 60% of the outstanding Common Stock of our Company.


In February 2015, the Board of Directors authorized the issuance of 1,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock to Stephen J. Thomas, III, Chairman, CEO and President of our Company, valued at $3,117,000 for compensation expense.


Series B Convertible Preferred Stock


In February 2015, we designated 3,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock as Series B Preferred Stock.


The Series B Preferred Stock was designated in February 2015, has a par value of $.001, is senior to any other class or series of outstanding Preferred Stock, except the Series A Preferred Stock, or Common Stock and does not bear dividends. The Series B Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference immediately after any Senior Securities, as defined and currently the Series A Preferred Stock, and of an amount equal to $2.00 per share. Holders of the Series B Preferred Stock have a right to convert all or any part of the Series B Preferred Shares and will receive and equal amount of common shares at the conversion price of $2.00 per share. The Series B Preferred Stock holders have a right to vote on any matter with holders of Common Stock and shall have a number of votes equal to that number of Common Shares on a one to one basis. There are 2,588,693 Series B Preferred Stock shares issued and outstanding.


Options & Warrants


Effective October 14, 2017, we adopted the 2017 TPT Global Tech, Inc. Stock Option and Award Incentive Plan (the "Plan"). The Plan provides for grants of nonqualified stock options and other stock awards, including warrants, to designated employees, officers, directors, advisors and independent contractors. A maximum of 20,000,000

Table of Contents  

shares of our common stock were reserved for options and other stock awards under the Plan. We have the ability to issue either options or warrants under the Plan.


As of September 30, 2017, we had options issued and outstanding outside of the Plan exercisable into 53,600 shares of our common stock at ranges from $0.046 to $0.22 per share. The options do not have a vesting period and are 100% exercisable.


There are no warrants outstanding as of September 30, 2017.


Transfer Agent


The transfer agent for our securities is Clear Trust, with offices at 16540 Pointe Village Dr., Suite 210, Lutz, Florida 33558, Phone (813) 235-4490.




We have not hired or retained any experts or counsel on a contingent basis, who would receive a direct or indirect interest in us, or who is, or was, our promoter, underwriter, voting trustee, director, officer or employee.








This prospectus contains various forward-looking statements that are based on our beliefs as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to us. When used in this prospectus, the words "believe", "expect", "anticipate", "estimate" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements may include statements regarding seeking business opportunities, payment of operating expenses, and the like, and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions which could cause actual results to differ materially from projections or estimates. Factors which could cause actual results to differ materially are discussed at length under the heading "Risk Factors". Should one or more of the enumerated risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or projected. Investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, all of which speak only as of the date made.


In this prospectus, unless the context requires otherwise, references to “we,” “our,” or “us” refer to TPT Global Tech, Inc. and our consolidated subsidiaries.


Company Overview


Through key acquisitions, in 2015 we launched wholesale and retail operations in the United States and Internationally. These first acquisitions with their customer bases, Distribution Channels and Technology are the base for our organic growth strategy opportunities to cross pollinate or sell our planned New Generation, New Media Technology products and services, Domestically and Internationally.


We, and our related companies and acquisitions, are seeking to be an innovative Telecom/CUBS (Cloud Unified Businesses Services) as one of the first to combine recurring Telecom, Mobile Banking, Media and Data/Cloud Services revenue under one roof, and then bring all relevant data from those services into a proprietary information matrix platform capable of delivering a “Daily and Intelligent Dashboard” to our Domestic and International customers. Such a cohesive combination of services and information from a single provider has been heretofore nonexistent. We intend to pioneer an integrated communication services and information technology suite, to empower companies with vital communications services technology, and highly relevant diagnostic information.


Table of Contents  

To date we have generated revenues primarily through operating as a Competitive Local Exchange Carrier (“CLEC”) in Arizona. Our primary revenues in 2016 and 2017 are primarily from telecommunications services and products.


Our operating divisions historically have been those that sell telecommunications services and those that sale telecommunications products. Cloud based services assets were acquired in 2016 and are intended to be more of a contributing factor to revenues in 2017 and forward.


Our Key Divisions: K Telecom and Global Telecom- GSM Distribution


K Telecom and Global Telecom are located in the Northwest of the United States and sell and distribute GSM Cell Phone and Prepaid GSM Services for MVNO’s (Mobile Virtual Network Operators) through approximately 100 brick and mortar retail store-front locations in Washington and Oregon.


Our TruCom, LLC– CLEC–Phoenix, Arizona


Our TruCom division, a subsidiary of Copperhead Digital Holdings, LLC, is a Facilities Based Competitive Local Exchange Carrier (CLEC) headquartered in Phoenix, AZ. Founded in 2006 (as Copperhead Digital Carrier) for the purpose of operating a state-of-the-art Fiber Optic Network constructed by and acquired from Adelphia Communications, TruCom now operates its own carrier class Fiber Optic Network, state-of-the-art Wireless Point-to-Point network, and Patent Pending proprietary “Bulletproof” technology seamlessly integrating the two.


TruCom offers Phone, Internet, Fiber Optic, Wireless, Hosted PBX, Wi-Fi, Wi-Max, Engineering, Cabling, Wiring and Cloud services. With a penchant for pushing the envelope, TruCom has pioneered innovative, hosted firewall and managed MPLS service technologies (SuperCore MPLS™) and was the Industry first to engineer patent-pending failover services utilizing our own fiber optic and wireless networks to guarantee business continuity and service uptime. Located in multiple Local Serving Offices and Points of Presence (POP’s) in the primary Data Centers in the market, TruCom’s extensive Fiber Optic Network runs through the heart of the most densely populated corridors of the Greater Phoenix Metro Area. Their Wireless Point to Point and Point to Multipoint Network is fed by the infinitely scalable capacity of the Fiber Optic Network and consists of more than 16 Major Access Points. This footprint not only provides coverage throughout the metro area, but also spans into outlying Cities, often providing the only carrier grade solution available in the region. TruCom’s substantial Network Assets, Innovative Service Offerings, and Dedicated Customer Service have driven a substantial increase in revenue each year over the past several years. With Clients like Arizona’s largest Hospitals, Multiple Universities, Government Municipalities, and Business leaders, TruCom has established itself as a Telecommunications Network Operator and Service Provider in the State of Arizona, operating since 2007.


Our Port2Port Division


We acquired assets that relate to reseller call termination both domestically and internationally in Dallas Texas of Port2Port. These assets provide approximately 100 Domestic and international customers and vendors terminating wholesale calls domestically and internationally.


Our San Diego Media Division


San Diego Media, Inc. (“SDM”)( www.sandiegomedia.com) is an established Southern California based software engineering and Internet e-commerce marketing services company that provides enterprise-class integrated solutions for manufacturers, retailers, and distributors focused on developing solutions for companies seeking online growth and profitability.


Founded in 1999, historically the primary market offering has been MaxEXP®, a proven stable, productivity-enabling proprietary eCommerce platform, built on open-standards technology that empowers companies to deploy and manage eCommerce offerings at lower cost and at less time than required to deploy more conventional high-end solutions — and, we believe, all without sacrificing the essential merchandising functionality, customizability, extensibility, scalability, security, and performance that much more expensive solutions provide. MaxEXP supports

Table of Contents  

both B2B and B2C functionality simultaneously which few other eCommerce solution will provide successfully out-of-the-box.


These early engagements have enabled SDM to solidify and refine the core SDM technology architecture and to enhance the platform with market-driven merchandising features and functionality. SDM has made significant R&D investments in operational infrastructure including sophisticated monitoring systems, comprehensive security, time-tracking, client management tools, and continuous compliance with the demanding payment card industry (PCI) standards.


SDM has complemented these systems with a full range of automated and enterprise-class capabilities for fully integrating with customer’s legacy systems, call centers, fulfillment houses, and other critical business process applications.


SDM has complimented its technologies with a wider range of professional internet and marketing services that enables client success, to create successful business relationships over long-term.


As the market has changed through the years SDM has continued to innovate and expand it strategic and technology development partnerships; these include, MIndTouch, BigCommerce, Avalara, CPC Strategies, eBridge, Imperva Incapsula, Chris Chase Design. SDM’s newest client is based in Singapore and it represents its most innovative use of technologies to date.


Technology Company Overview


Our Company was formed as the successor of two US Corporations, Ally Pharma US, a Pharmaceutical technology research company (OTCBB:TPTW) founded in 1988 and TPT Global Inc. a worldwide, Media Content, Voice and Data, Interconnect and International gateway provider. TPT Global Tech is headquartered in San Diego, California and operates as a holding company for its Media, Smartphone, Network, Content and SaaS (Software as a Services) domestic and international businesses.


Historically and through key acquisitions we launched Telecommunications wholesale and retail operations in the United States and Internationally. These first acquisitions with their Customer Bases, Distribution Channels and Technology are the base for our organic growth strategy, and provide opportunities to cross sell our platforms and New Media Technology products and services Domestically and Internationally.


We operate as a Media Content Hub for Domestic and International syndication, Technology/Telecommunications company using on our own proprietary Global Digital Media TV and Telecommunications infrastructure platform and we also provides technology solutions to businesses worldwide. We offer Software as a Service (SaaS), Technology Platform as a Service (PAAS), Cloud-based Unified Communication as a Service (UCaaS) and carrier-grade performance and support for businesses over our private IP MPLS fiber and wireless network in the United States. Our cloud-based UCaaS services allow businesses of any size to enjoy all the latest voice, data, media and collaboration features in today's global technology markets. We also operate as a Master Distributor for Nationwide Mobile Virtual network Operators (MVNO) and Independent Sales Organization (ISO) as a Master Distributor for Pre-Paid Cellphone services, Mobile phones, Cellphone Accessories and Global Roaming Cellphones.


Our technologies “Gathers Big Data” to predict our customers’ viewing and spending habits. We then deliver Products and Services to support that estimated demand and share advertising revenues with our Content, Digital Media and Linear Broadcast Partners worldwide.


Each of our four divisions contributes to the launch of our global Content delivery platform “Viewme Live” and creates cross pollinating revenue opportunities and a closed Global E-commerce Eco environment which we believe will help us execute our short and long term corporate objectives. Our Content Division which consist of Blue Collar Productions (our TV and Film content Production company) and (Hollywood Riviera Studios our TV and film Production Facility) together create original content and in some cases third party content. Once Content has been produced we will then broadcast and delivered that content over our proprietary Mobile TV Platform on our proprietary Trucom Telecommunication Network infrastructure domestically and internationally.


Table of Contents  

Our corporate goal is to work within our four in house divisions (Smartphone, Network, Content and SaaS) to launch hardware sales and build a viewer subscriber base domestically and internationally. This edge device deployment would deliver free Content, free Linear Broadcast feeds and Social Media features on our Free proprietary Mobile app platform with the anticipation to aggregate and showcase our original and third party Content, Digital Media and Linear broadcast feeds from and too the four corners of the Globe.


All of the back technology or features for Viewme Live have been developed and we anticipate spending additional $500,000 USD to complete the front end features which believe will take approximately 120 days from our funding event.


We have generated revenues in 2016 and 2017 primarily through operating as a Facilities Based Telecommunications Competitive Local Exchange Carrier (“CLEC”) in Arizona. The company currently operates an approximate 58 miles Fiber optic ring throughout the greater Phoenix valley offering such services as Basic Residential Phone service, Basic Business phone service, POT’s lines, Basic Fiber Broadband Internet services, Wireless Internet Services, Toll Free 800 services, EFax, Erate, Dedicated T-1 Services, Auto Attendant, SIP Trunks, Mobile and Voip services. These services will continue for the forseeable future weighted heavily towards offering more Wireless Internet services and the Fiber Ring will be transformed into a Private Test facility to be offered for rent to businesses needing a private network to test new products for proof of concept purposes.


We, and our related acquired companies are seeking to be an innovative Media-Telecom/CUBS (Cloud Unified Businesses Services) company and one of the first to combine recurring Telecom, Media and Data/Cloud Services revenue under one roof, then bring all relevant data from those services into a proprietary telecom infrastructure and information matrix platform capable of delivering a “Daily and Intelligent Dashboard” to our Domestic and International customers. Such a planned cohesive combination of services and information from a single provider has been heretofore nonexistent. We intend to pioneer an integrate communication services and information technology suites to empower individuals and companies with vital communications, Smartphone, Network, Content, SaaS (Software as A Service), New Media Technology products and services, and valuable relevant diagnostic information both Domestically and Internationally. 


We are currently able to deliver a live Global TV Broadcast and Social Media Platform utilizing a Mobile App technology on our proprietary Content Delivery Network. We plan to expand our Cloud Unified Business Services (CUBS) technology based business services unifying multiple services from the cloud.


CUBS (Cloud Unified Business Services) - We are a CUBS provider, acquiring customers and then cross selling additional products and services through our proprietary Wrap Around Relationship Marketing (WARM) system, intending to make the customers very sticky.


Planned Activities


Big Data & Predictive Analytics - Our capability to utilize our proprietary aggregation platform to gather data from our hardware and software edge device (End Users) deployments positions the Company to be a leader in predictive analytics.


Table of Contents  


Cross-Sales – Our growth strategy through complimentary acquisitions may create opportunities to cross and sell its New Generation, New Media technology products and services to a growing customer base across multiple distribution channels, both domestically and internationally.



Market Launch - Thru our acquisition of View-me Live from Matrix, we have acquired the live backend broadcast Network technology for our Global Mobile TV and Social Media platform. Subject to raising capital ($500,000) from our fund raising activities we believe we are approximately 120 days from completing the frontend development component to launch its “View-me Live” Mobile APP delivery platform at an estimated cost of $500,000 USD.



    /---------------4th Qtr 2017 Agreements -----------/ Proposed      
  SaaS /---------------Content-----------/ /--------------Network-------------/ Phone General  
Initial Uses of Funds:       Proposed        
  San Diego Media HRS Blue Collar  Viewme Live Proposed Acquistion Lion Phone 4K Units General 2018 Acq Totals
Est. Build-Out Costs-Complex  $               -         $              2,000,000        $    2,000,000
 Studio  Equip    $    1,000,000    $              2,500,000        $    3,500,000
2nd Used Broadcast Truck     $       600,000            $       600,000
Hardware Manufacturing            $      500,000    $       500,000
Viewme Live Completion         $                 500,000        $       500,000
Initial Capx  $               -     $    1,600,000  $                    -     $              5,000,000  $                    -     $      500,000  $               -     $    7,100,000
 Down Payment Cash for Acquisitions         5750000  $      400,000    $    6,150,000
Seller Note Retirement   $     250,000  $    1,965,000  $        1,600,000  $              4,000,000  $       4,250,000      $  12,065,000
Marketing  Budget         $              1,000,000 250000       1,000,000          250,000  $    2,500,000
General Working Capital  $     100,000            $   1,000,000  $    1,100,000
Real Estate Acquisiton        $              5,000,000        $    5,000,000
Total Project  Cost    $     350,000  $    3,565,000  $        1,600,000  $            15,000,000  $     10,250,000  $   1,900,000  $   1,250,000  $  33,915,000


Table of Contents  


Quarter by Quarter Analysis   SaaS   /---------------Content-----------/   /--------------Network-------------/   Phone   General
Capital :                            
  1 st                           $ 500,000     $ 5,750,000     $ 500,000             $6,750,000
  2 nd   $ 250,000     $ 3,565,000     $ 1,600,000     $ 4,000,000             $ 400,000             $9,815,000
  3 rd                           $ 9,500,000                             $9,500,000
  4 th                                   $ 4,250,000                     $4,250,000
  Working Capital:                                                             $0
  1 st   $ 100,000                                             $ 250,000     $350,000
  2 nd                           $ 100,000     $ 100,000     $ 350,000     $ 350,000     $900,000
  3 rd                           $ 450,000     $ 100,000     $ 350,000     $ 350,000     $1,250,000
  4 th                           $ 450,000     $ 50,000     $ 300,000     $ 300,000     $1,100,000
        $ 350,000     $ 3,565,000     $ 1,600,000     $ 15,000,000     $ 10,250,000     $ 1,900,000     $ 1,250,000     $33,915,000



    Projected Capital Phases
Private Placement   3/31/2018   $ 10,000,000  
Capital or Loan Proceeds   6/30/2018   $ 11,000,000  
Subsequent Capital Raise   12/31/2018   $ 13,000,000  
        $ 34,000,000  



  1st Qtr   2nd Qtr   3rd Qtr   4th Qtr   Total
  $ 6,750,000                             $6,750,000
          $ 9,815,000                     $9,815,000
                  $ 9,500,000             $9,500,000
                          $ 4,250,000     $4,250,000
  $ 350,000                             $350,000
          $ 900,000                     $900,000
                  $ 1,250,000             $1,250,000
                          $ 1,100,000     $1,100,000
  $ 7,100,000     $ 10,715,000     $ 10,750,000     $ 5,350,000     $33,915,000



    1st Qtr   2nd Qtr   3rd Qtr   4th Qtr   Total
 SaaS   $ 0     $ 250,000                     $ 250,000  
 Working Capital   $ 100,000     $ 0             $ 0     $ 100,000  
 Content           $ 5,165,000     $ 0             $ 5,165,000  
 Working Capital                                   $ 0  
 Network   $ 6,250,000     $ 4,000,000     $ 9,500,000     $ 4,250,000     $ 24,000,000  
 Working Capital   $ 0     $ 200,000     $ 550,000     $ 500,000     $ 1,250,000  
 Phone   $ 500,000     $ 400,000                     $ 900,000  
 Working Capital   $ 0     $ 350,000     $ 350,000     $ 300,000     $ 1,000,000  
 General   $ 250,000     $ 350,000     $ 350,000     $ 300,000     $ 1,250,000  
    $ 7,100,000     $ 10,715,000     $ 10,750,000     $ 5,350,000     $ 33,915,000  



Table of Contents  



In November of 2017, we entered into agreements to acquire the following new business subsidiaries: The agreements to acquire these entities include terms and conditions that, until seller financing is paid off restricts our control of the assets and ownership interests, among other restrictions.


Hollywood Riviera Studios


Hollywood Riviera Studios (“HRS”) offers a state-of-the-art, high-end production facility for commercials, TV production and short videos. HRS offers technical and creative direction with the ability to interface with clients at any stage of production.


HRS offers Stage Rentals, Green Screens, Edit Bays + Productions Offices for live TV Shows, Reality Shows, Commercials, Web-episodes, Corporate Videos and Mobile On-Location services for live sporting events, award shows, concerts and any other type of media production. Hollywood Riviera Studios offers services to major networks and clients to contract use of any party of our 13,000 Sq. Ft. Divisible Studio. HRS offers large storage capabilities, parking for over 200 vehicles, kitchen, bathrooms with showers, outdoor eating area, and green rooms.


HRS also has an equipment rental division. HRS offers a wide variety of equipment for rent, from cameras to lighting, grip, production trucks, and accessories. Just about anything else a production requires. In addition , HRS also offers our existing standing pre-lit sets.


HRS owns 40% of HRS Mobile accounted for as equity investment. HRS Mobile Production Truck service is a technical resource that can provide the exact needs for off-site production. Our total service capability for turnkey mobile service includes: Mobile Production Trucks Rental, Crewing, Mobile Satellite Trucks and Technical Management.


Our partial list of clients and services provided:


CNN Turner Broadcasting/Hero Broadcasting


HRS produced for 2 years a daily 1hr. live TV news magazine show. HRS provided all the technical needs including full HD control room, stage rental, lighting and full technical crewing Time Warner Cable Sports and TWC Deportes: HRS was the production company for 29 MLS Games in 2012 for the Los Angeles Galaxy. Each job required a dual feed in English and Spanish. HRS provided Post-Production Services such as dubbing, translating, voice over recording and editing of various projects for TWC. We have produced several live and tape delay High School Football, Soccer, Softball and Basketball Games since 2012.




Production Company for Rose Parade since 2010 handling crewing, mobile unit, satellite truck, staging, lighting and all the engineering logistics involved with a production of such magnitude.


“Mananitas a la Virgen” since 2010 providing full production services for the network.


Several Town Halls for “Despierta America” and KMEX-34 where HRS provided all the technical elements for a pre-taped shows in the Los Angeles area.


“Fiestas Patrias”- Mobile Unit, Satellite Transmission, Crewing, Staging, and Lighting


“Desfile de la Independencia” - Mobile Unit, Satellite Transmission, Crewing, Staging and Lighting.


Table of Contents  



For 2 years HRS Studios was home to 2 daily local shows that aired on Channel 22 in Los Angeles. “Con Chile y Limon” was an entertainment daily show and “Contacto Deportivo” was a 1hr. sports show.


HRS provided studio space, control room, stage, crewing and transmission via fiber.


HRS also provided all the production for in-house commercial production and support for their promotions department.




HRS provides post-production services for the network’s segment “La Academia”.


HRS has produced 2 live specials for MundoFox. One with former president of Mexico V. Fox and another one with former Sec. of State Condolesa Rice. We provided staging, lighting, HD Mobile Truck and crewing services for Fiesta Broadway Festival.


Televisa Network:


HRS has provided all production needs for Telethon Mexico. HD Truck, Staging, Lighting, Logistics and Crewing Services.




HRS is the production company for all local soccer games for Galaxy II, a development team for the LA Galaxy. The games are being streamed lived on YouTube. HRS is in charge of all the technical logistics and crewing for those games.


Chivas USA:


HRS is the production company for most of Chivas USA local games in Los Angeles. We provide, HD Truck, Transmission, Crewing and Engineering Services.


Blue Collar Production Division


Our production division, Blue Collar Productions, creates original live action and animated content productions and has produced hundreds of hours of material for the television, theatrical, home entertainment and new media markets. Mr. Rowen, our CEO of Blue Collar, works closely with major television networks, cable channels and film studios to produce home entertainment products. Blue Collar creates original live action and animated content and has produced hundreds of hours of material for the television, theatrical, home entertainment and new media markets.

The Documentary film group at Blue Collar recently completed a film on the cultural impact of Goodfellas : 20 Years Later that featured Martin Scorsese, Robert DeNiro, Lorraine Bracco, Leonardo DiCaprio and many others. They have also produced a series of film anthologies for Turner Classic Movies. Blue Collar is currently in production on Built To Fail, which is a look at the history of street wear. The film features Tommy Hilfiger, Russell Simmons and a host of notable street wear designers. They are also in pre-production on The 29 Club , a look at notable musicians who all tragically died at age 29; Memories in Music , which is an in-depth study of the impact of memory through music on Alzheimer’s patients and Faces of Vegas , an exploration into the culture of Las Vegas, Nevada.

Table of Contents  

Blue Collar Productions currently has the feature film Looking For Alaska , based on the John Green novel, producing for Paramount Pictures. The company produced for a pilot for MTV for a possible series, “My Jam” aired in the Fall of 2016. Blue Collar has also produced two seasons of “Caribbean’s Next Top Model Season.”

Blue Collar Productions designs branding and marketing campaigns and has had contracts with some of the world’s largest companies including PepsiCo, Intel, HP, WalMart and many other Fortune 500 companies. Additionally, they create motion picture, television and home entertainment marketing campaigns for studios including Sony, DreamWorks, Twentieth Century Fox, Universal Studios, Paramount Studios, and Warner Brothers.

The CEO of this division, Mr. Rowen, has worked with filmmakers including Steven Spielberg, Ron Howard, Brett Ratner and James Cameron. Mr. Rowen also has very close working relationships with actors including Tom Hanks, Brad Pitt, Julia Roberts, Robert Downey, Jr., Denzel Washington, Ryan Gosling, Sofia Vergara, Mariska Hargitay and many others.

Prior to starting Blue Collar Productions, Mr. Rowen functioned as the head of home entertainment production for DreamWorks SKG from 1997 to 2000. He also serves as the President of Long Leash Entertainment, an aggregator of entertainment based intellectual property and creator of high end entertainment content.

Our Business Methods


Centralized Platform and New Generation Network


We are now operating a next-generation broadband network reselling other companies’ networks on a wholesale arbitrage basis (buying and reselling other companies’ capacity) on our centralized VIVO Platform. We are interconnected to U.S. and International carriers to date. Once funded, we intend to deploy our own in-country networks in the targeted emerging markets. This will enable us to be able to provide better quality termination and increase our operating margins. We believe our platform will produce substantial operational cost savings. Because of our pricing advantage, we are able to offer our clients products and services at an attractive pricing structure, creating a strong competitive advantage. Based on our low network operating costs and low-cost infrastructure, we believe we may penetrate emerging markets with little network build-out and at a reasonable price. Management believes that our service offerings will be well received in emerging markets based on existing relationships and pricing structure, which will enable us to set the industry standard with little competition.


Once we establish in-country networks, we will be able to market Phones, Networks, Content and SaaS products targeted to specific subgroups that coincide with the country/region where we have a network in place or a strategic partnership network in place.


Use of Incumbent Networks


Under formal agreements we can privately brand and resell incumbent carriers’ underlying broadband networks, while deploying our own Wimax/Wi-Fi/GSM service plans and mobile handsets.


As a true value add, our VIVO billing platform allows us to manage the billing and routing, offering our customers a seamless, branded network from anywhere we maintain a relationship. By way of incumbent operator networks, we can sell and market to retail and wholesale customers without the high infrastructure costs associated with deploying our own network. If and when the revenues justify the cost of constructing our own network, we plan to investigate adding a wireless Broadband/ GSM network, and transfer our customer base in a final step to reduce costs of goods sold long-term.


Wholesale Termination


Wholesale termination is the reselling of excess network capacity on a reciprocal basis to other telecom carriers both domestically and internationally. Due to the large number of carrier relationships we have in the US and abroad, we believe we can immediately increase our wholesale termination in each country in which we have a license to

Table of Contents  

operate. This wholesale activity generates additional cash flow immediately if successfully implemented. Wholesale termination is a low risk, low margin business.


Service Description


Our next-generation wireless Broadband/GSM network relies on non-line-of-sight technology. This will provide a level of performance comparable to that delivered by evolving Worldwide Interoperability of Microwave Access (WiMAX) standards. The cost advantage equates to substantial reductions of fixed costs as compared to building traditional, legacy, and switched networks.


Our products and marketing strategy unifies the various features available in today’s telecommunication environment including:

· Significant international broadband capacity
· High quality VoIP communication
· Cellular/GSM and Wi-Fi wireless convergence
· IPTV, Content Applications and Financial Services Products
· Remote network management
· Sophisticated Prepaid, Wholesale and Retail billing
· CRM management; and Intranet Build-out, back office management and reporting.


Our Business Segments


Our business segment consists generally of providing strategic, legacy and data integration products and services to small, medium and enterprise business, wholesale and governmental customers, including other communication providers. Our strategic products and services offered to these customers include our collocation, hosting, broadband, VoIP, information technology and other ancillary services. Our services offered to these customers primarily include local and long-distance voice, inducing the sale of unbundled network elements (“UNEs”), switched access and other ancillary services. Our product offerings include the sale of telecommunications equipment located on customers’ premises and related products and professional services, all of which are described further below.


Our products and services include local and long-distance voice, broadband, Ethernet, collocation, hosting (including cloud hosting and managed hosting), data integration, video, network, public access, VoIP, information technology and other ancillary services.


We offer our customers the ability to bundle together several products and services. For example, we offer integrated and unlimited local and long0distance3 voice services. Our customers can also bundle two or more services such as broadband, video (including through our strategic partnerships), voice services. We believe our customers value the convenience and price discounts associated with receiving multiple services through a single company.


Most of our products and services are provided using our telecommunications network, which consists of voice and data switches, copper cables, fiber-optic cables and other equipment.


Described in greater detail below are our key products and services.


Table of Contents  





(1) Acquisition agreements executed November 2017 and amended February 2018.








Our corporate strategy in expanding our operations and potential product and service streams is as follows.



Establish our brand as a competitive service and product provider in the communications industry.



To create top of mind brand awareness and emotional relevance resulting: TPT Global Tech, Inc. being the preferred and requested product line of products in the industry.



Our distributor will use direct selling efforts. Their efforts will be supported with our marketing, advertising, and merchandising programs. The primary task will be to increase the sales through retail channels.


Table of Contents  



The first marketing objective must be to refine our brand and secure our place in the minds of the consumers. This will be accomplished through the execution of an integrated branding, identity and services marketing programs. The goals for this segment will be an enhanced brand identity, a brand applications and a digital assets suite.




Our plan includes a direct sales program targeting businesses, small business and home office users of communications. The direct sales efforts will be supported with third party marketing integration. To further enhance the sales process, we will offer an offering program including services and product sheets, coupons, point of sale materials (banners, shelf talkers, and end cap displays and danglers) and internet marketing programs.


Based on the above benefit scenarios, we plan to seize the following opportunities:



The purpose of our marketing efforts is to move the product sales from their current position into the rapid growing “popularity” stage. Our strategy includes the following marketing programs: Branding; Merchandising; Direct; Display Advertising; Media; Public Relations; Publicity; Events; Investor Relations; Metrics Dashboard; and, Personal Sales. Our objective is to gain the sales momentum required to reach the “brand preference” stage of product growth as soon as possible. This is the stage where we plan sales grow at a steady and stabilized pace.




A complete direct marketing program including direct mail, blast email and URLs may be used to introduce the products to new customers and secure leads for the sales team. We plan to employ the services of a database marketing company to leverage techniques to target prospective clients and reinforce product messages throughout the selling process. This process will commence with the modeling of our existing customer data and the analysis of the results using sophisticated analytic tools. Cross-channel marketing will be utilized in conjunction with the direct marketing including social marketing. Our focus of this marketing medium will be relevance and timing, which only this medium can provide full control over and the ability to fully quantify the results.




We intend to test several media options to determine which, if any, effectively drive sales and sales leads. The mediums being consider include outdoor advertising, both static and mobile, magazine ads, and radio spots. Other media to be explored are direct mail post cards and emails to opt in viewers.




We plan to employ the services of a public relations firm to build a corporate profile to keep the name and the services and products in front of consumers. A third-party PR firm will be responsible for writing and publishing press releases, coordinating event marketing and managing investor relations.


We employ marketing, sales and customer service personnel on an as needed basis for specific events to build brand awareness. We use a range of marketing strategies and tactics to build our brand and increase sales, including point-

Table of Contents  

of-sale materials, event sponsorship, in-store and on premise promotions, public relations, and a variety of other traditional and non-traditional marketing techniques to support the sales of all of our products.


We believe that a marketing mix of event promotions, social media, print advertising in local media and internet advertising providing information and samples of our products at social events is a strategy that may help increase sales.




We plan to profile our existing customers and create a sophisticated data model to mathematically and statistically identify our “ideal” customer. Further the model will be used to learn exactly how the target customer wishes to be communicated with and marketed to.




We plan to market our product internationally. Many of the current products offered by us have features for the international community. This will be a secondary but strong focus by our marketing team.




Our senior management team has over 30 years of experience in the various consumer product industries, and has a proven track record of creating value both organically and through strategic acquisitions. Our management intends to utilize the best available and fit-for-purpose technology and experienced contractors to improve production and expand distribution.




Our Goals


Our primary goal is to continue to grow our business by improving value to our current customers and vendors. In providing a high quality network we intend to continue to grow our business. Additionally, we intend to purchase established telecommunications and technology companies that will immediately generate and increase traffic (revenue) to our Company’s retail and wholesale network. Companies that we are strategically aligned with have in their core business synergistic retail products and services that include, but are not limited to, Telecom Cloud Services Media, Merchant Services/Mobile Banking, Cloud Services and Media (e.g. credit/debit card processing, check/ACH payment processing, ecommerce/merchant processing, web hosting, voice, data, GSM/Wi-Fi Mobile, Mobile Money Transfers, IPTV, VOD and Live Mobile Broadcasting, Prepaid Calling Card and PIN-less Prepaid services). If we acquire a strategic partner as a subsidiary, we believe we will have the ability to aggregate their analogous technology platforms onto our proprietary Software Access System operating platform for integration and efficiency.


We intend to work our media to accelerate cohesively in the mobile technology sectors: LIVE Broadcast, Video on Demand (VOD) Apps, and Digital Video Magazine (DVM) Apps. While “white labeling” our technologies as SaaS, our primary focus is what we believe is the first Global Cyber LIVE Mobile TV broadcast network, Viewme Live. The Viewme Live Network™ is a 24-hour LIVE worldwide mobile TV network, delivered via iOS and Android apps. The Viewme Live Network™ presents a diversity of Linear Broadcast Channels (Domestically and International), coupled with Social Media Platforms with combined functions that compete with some of the largest and most powerful Digital Media platforms, to connected audiences who live a mobile-centric life.




Table of Contents  




Network Services

Domestic and Global Telecommunications offerings include: Mobile TV, Phone, Internet, Fiber Optic, Wireless, Hosted PBX, Wi-Fi, Wi-Max, Engineering, Cabling, Wiring and Cloud services. Our telecommunications division has pioneered innovative, hosted firewall and managed MPLS service technologies (SuperCore MPLS) and was the Industry first to engineer patent-pending Bulletproof™ failover services utilizing our own fiber optic and wireless networks to guarantee business continuity and service uptime.


As a retail and business media and telecommunications provider operating a high -speed Fiber Optic Network and Wireless Network in the USA at a cost competitive rate for new technologies, we are growing our operations through sales of our core voice & data connectivity products to small and midsized business clients. We have a growth strategy through acquisitions in order to increase regional operations and deploy more technologies to niche & underserved markets. Unified Cloud Services, Unified Communications (UC) or Unified Communications/Collaboration (UCC) has been a topic of interest to users looking to evolve from a disorderly combination of media, voice, email and message communications to something more structured. Our goal is to target existing and new small and medium businesses (“SMBs”) to transition their older voice system businesses, expand their software collaboration offerings, and most recently build cloud service offerings. Cloud solution gives our customers the flexibility to support a myriad of mobile devices as part of their hardware strategy, whether it's launching a bring-your-own-device initiative, implementing a one-to-one program or equipping SMBs with mobile computing carts full of tablets, netbooks, or notebooks in a secured environment.


Scalability and Cost Efficiency


Our proprietary Software Access System platform currently runs our global operations. In short, it does this by connecting our customer base with the most profitable vendor route while calculating least cost routing, analyzing route quality, and respecting “dipping” protocols. Based on the demand, we have the ability to scale to meet the needs of our customers. Comparable “off the shelf” software systems in the marketplace can cost in the hundreds of thousands of dollars just to purchase, not to mention expensive service contracts, which may continue in perpetuity after the original purchase. Our proprietary platform, in which we have invested and have developed over several years, we are able to operate a global network with better efficiency which we believe differentiates us from other competitors in the marketplace.


We believe our competitive advantages are:


· Our products and services are 90% ready to launch globally
· We offer 3-15 seconds latency Cellular – 1-5 on Wi-Fi
· We offer Proprietary Optimizing / Stabilizing software
· We offer Multi-Channel LIVE and Video on Demand worldwide
Table of Contents  
· We offer Patent Pending real time dynamic failover solution called Bulletproof™
· We have 57 route miles of fiber optic network meshed with a microwave canopy in Phoenix, Arizona
· We offer our own proprietary voice switching and management platform running least cost routing and real time financial analytics
· We have over 175 existing USA and International Telephone companies already interconnected to our telecom switches. These customers and vendors are ready made strategic technology distribution partners for our Telecom, Media, and Cloud Services products
· We offer Patent Pending Full HD Naked Eye 3D Smartphone

Our Strategy


Our business, marketing, and sales strategy is structured around:


· Pursuing selective, strategic, distribution relationships combined with cash positive acquisitions to build immediate revenue streams and increase our Company’s network footprint.


· Utilize the expanded network to offer our Company’s service thereby increasing marginal revenues through the low risk offering of wholesale termination and prepaid services through existing distribution channels, retail stores and E-Commerce both domestically and internationally.


· Pursuing markets within countries where there is a lower concentration of communications services that will result in initial higher pricing and potential for gross profit.


· Providing low cost, pricing leading VoIP/GSM value added services through our Company’s next-generation centralized software platform and network.


· Partnering and developing joint ventures with incumbent networks or government agencies to penetrate local emerging markets in order to build and operate Intranet Network Infrastructures that would move data over a secured network servicing government buildings and agencies, including police, military, hospitals and schools.


Our Intended Marketing Plan and Product Roll Out for 4th Quarter 2017


· Satellite radio syndication simulcast with over 25 million domestic U.S. listeners
· Connected TV partner with over 18 million viewers worldwide.
· Airline entertainment partnership with over 12 million international viewers.
· Supported by an international public relations firm.
· Comprehensive social media marketing campaign involving popular bloggers and podcasters


Our sales and marketing approach to our business and consumer customers emphasizes customer-oriented sales, marketing and service. Our marketing plans include marketing our products and services primarily through direct sales representatives, inbound call centers, local retail stores, telemarketing and third parties, including retailers, satellite television providers, door to door sales agents and digital marketing firms. We support our distribution with digital marketing, direct mail, bill inserts, newspaper and television advertising, website promotions, public relations activities and sponsorship of community events and sports venues.


Similarly, our sales and marketing approach to our business customers includes a commitment to provide comprehensive communications and IT solutions for business, wholesale and governmental customers of all sizes, ranging from small offices to select enterprise customers. We strive to offer our business customers stable, reliable, secure and trusted solutions. Our marketing plans include marketing our products and services primarily through digital advertising, direct sales representatives, inbound call centers, telemarketing and third parties, including

Table of Contents  

telecommunications agents, system integrators, value-added resellers and other telecommunications firms. We support our distribution through digital advertising, events, television advertising, website promotions and public relations.


Marketing Designs


We have designed our services and products offered to be:


· Portable. We offer the ability to access our network from anywhere within our coverage area without being restricted to a specific location.
· Simple. Our services are easy to install. After connecting our modem to an ATA or computer and a power source, our wireless broadband service is immediately available and requires no software installation.
· Fast. We offer speeds that typically exceed legacy cellular networks and are competitive with fixed broadband offerings.
· A Good Value. We generally price our services competitively because our costs to build and operate our network are significantly lower than the networks operated by many of our competitors.

With the popularity of social media, people are demanding fast broadband connectivity on an increasingly mobile basis. We believe that our services meet this demand, and will market this in our efforts to increase our subscriber growth rate.




We believe the following competitive strengths enable us to meet the demand for simple, reliable and portable wireless broadband connectivity:


Table of Contents  


·          First mover. We are the first company we are aware of to launch a Global Cyber Mobile TV and Social Media Network that incorporates functional feature of the largest Digital Media companies in the world.

·          High barriers to entry. Our issued and pending patents, as well as our proprietary Media platforms and Naked Eye 3D technology trade secrets give, us a strong intellectual property position that we believe creates a significant barrier to entry for potential competitors.

·          Broad range of applications for our platform. This allows us to build a deep new product pipeline that creates multiple paths to build a large and profitable business.


·          Multi-billion-dollar addressable market. “Mobile advertising accounted for more than half (51%) of the record-breaking $72.5 billion spent by advertisers last year, according to the latest IAB Internet Advertising Revenue Report, released today by the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB), and prepared by PwC US. The total represents a 22 percent increase, up from $59.6 billion in 2015. Mobile experienced a 77 percent upswing from $20.7 billion the previous year, hitting

$36.6 billion in 2016.” http://www.thenewbase.com/home/media-news-events/news-detail/?no_cache=1&newsid=134110&title=mobile-captures-



·          Diverse revenue streams including Digital Media partnerships. We anticipate generating significant revenue from our Digital Media platforms. Our Linear Broadcast partners will play a large part in generating revenues from the sale of mobile and social media advertising. ​


·          Strong senior leadership team. Our founders and senior leaders have experience in building, and operating several companies in our business areas. We have phone, network, content, SaaS, product development, and commercialization experience that has enabled us to establish market leadership positions for the companies where we previously were employed.


·          Differentiated Services. We believe our service is unique because of our combination of our Worldwide Operational Platform, Worldwide Affiliates, Cutting Edge Technology, Portability, Simplicity and Speed to Market with a competitive domestic and International Price Structure. We believe this combination of factors differentiates our subscriber’s experience when compared to broadband services provided by DSL, cable modem, wireless third-generation or 3G, networks.


·          Strong Spectrum Position. We use unlicensed and licensed spectrum (in Arizona), which avoids radio frequency interference that hinders competitors using non-licensed spectrum, such as WiFi network operators. Access to spectrum is a fundamental barrier to entry for the delivery of high quality wireless communications. Through our partnerships, we believe that we have access to the second largest spectrum position in our band within the United States.


·          Advanced, Scalable Technology . Because we intend to design our own software and equipment, we can refine our product development roadmap to meet our subscriber’s needs. We believe our NLOS, IP-based Ethernet architecture and compression technology confers competitive advantages since it simplifies both network deployment and customer use while supporting a broad range of potential premium services.


·          Efficient Economic Model. We believe our individual market economic model is characterized by low fixed capital and operating expenditures relative to other wireless and wire line broadband service providers. We believe our individual market model is highly scalable and replicable across our markets. As our capabilities evolve, we expect to generate incremental revenue streams from our subscriber base by developing and offering premium products and services.


·          Experienced Management Team. Stephen J. Thomas, our Founder, Chairman, and Chief Executive Officer, has been an active entrepreneur, operator and investor in the industry for more than 17 years in VoIP and wireless communications industry. He previously served as Director of Network Optimization / Validation for WorldxChange, Inc. and CEO and President of New Orbit Communications, Inc., which focused on International Operator Services in United States, Mexico, El Salvador and Guatemala.




Lion Smart Phone Product


We are currently seeking a manufacturer for our Lion Smart Phone. Our Management believes our patent pending Lion smart phone is the first Full HD Naked Eye 3D smart phone ever launched in the United States. Lion Universe’s mobile 3D technology is patent pending. The smart phone will be distributed through our wholly-owned subsidiary K-TEL, in their existing brick and mortar distribution channel in the Northwest expanding into other areas. It is anticipated that a national and international roll out will soon follow. TPTW is building industry leading personal cellular phones designed for a wide appeal. With a business model built on innovation and progress starting with the Lion Phone technology, we intend to produce high-quality and easy-to-use cellular phones. Our Lion Phone was designed for consumers looking for portable and affordable cutting-edge technology. Our first-generation phones come equipped with full high definition resolution screen for better viewing. We believe this Full HD Naked Eye 3D smart Phone is perfect for watching movies, playing games, even editing photos or videos.


Whether that is looking at photos, playing music, emailing or surfing the web, our management believes consumers want more from their phones. We believe our Lion Phone raises the bar for cellular phones. For the first time ever, cellular users can enjoy quality 3D viewing with the naked eyes no glasses required enjoying full high definition video with smooth playback.


Our Management believes consumers have been waiting for a way to watch their favorite movies in 3D, with the convenience of their phone and Gamers can have the leisure of playing their games without taking all head gear with

Table of Contents  

them. Our Lion Universe Technology strives to give customers the best possible experience with our Full HD Naked Eye 3D smart phone in the US and Global markets.”


We intend to market this phone in 2018.


Mobile Device Viewer Market Expansion


In general, viewers are consuming more content via mobile TV distribution, while rapidly abandoning expensive subscriptions from standard satellite TV and cable networks. The rise of high quality content on low--cost platforms, such as mobile devices, continues to negatively impact the standard TV industry. The media business is being forced to evolve and adjust to massive disruptions in content distribution methods. Traditional media models are functionally broken and will continue to be disrupted by technology, which is driven by the needs of the younger generation. The future of media is dependent on new technology platforms. These platform models (e.g. smart TV, connected TV boxes, mobile TV devices) are the future of content distribution. Google, through YouTube, has changed the face of video content distribution. Amazon continues to disrupt the book industry. Apple has redefined music and application distribution. And Microsoft is continuing to change the engagement model and distribution of content through its Xbox TV game console.


For the first time in history, in 3Q 2014, the average time spent (per day) on mobile devices exceeded the time spent watching television – 177 minutes versus 168 minutes (source: Flurry Analytics). Because of the meaningful decrease in costs associated with capturing (and processing) video, and due to significant expansions in bandwidth and increases in Wi-Fi, Internet/cloud TV disrupted the traditional television industry. In 2012--2013, cord--cutting, or the process of canceling a cable TV or satellite subscription and watching television over the Internet, began to accelerate. Today, mobile television is becoming even more disruptive as the average mobile user reaches for his or her mobile phone 150 times a day. By June 2017, more than 180 million mobile apps had already been downloaded. (source: Apple 2016.)


We believe mobile delivery has a growing appeal to advertisers and subscribers. Mobile advertising revenue is expected to grow to $40 billion this year (source research firm BIA/Kelsey). In July 2013, Americans viewed 19.6 billion video ads and reached 55.4% of the total U.S. population. Mobile video ad-spend is projected to exceed $6 billion by the end of 2017, meaning 2017 will be a prime moment for mobile marketing to capture its share of resulting media allocations. Pre--roll ads (short commercials that proceed a video) are considered to be 2.5 times more effective than banner ads. And, for brand recall, video advertising has a 3.5 times higher recall pattern than banner advertising across all devices.

Content Mining Plan

Once our planned SaaS media applications, smart phones and tablets are launched into the domestic and international markets, content analytics or marketing data will be gathered from these devices. The data generated from these applications and devices will give us an advantage insight into our subscribers viewing and buying habits. Once data has been scrubbed of personally identifying information, we plan to be able to create original or lease content from broadcast partners to service what our analytics are telling us to produce (or license), with the intent on moving us closer towards predictive analytics. Predictive analytics is being able to predict what our customer likes based on their viewing habits and then produce that content targeted to our subscriber and then “push” that new (or licensed) content to them.


Our Viewme Live Technology Plan


We offer VML technology for which we plan to expand marketing. We believe SaaS Viewme Live (VML) could become a leading Digital Media Mobile TV technology platform in the business-to-business and business-to-consumer markets. Our proprietary software platform can reach a worldwide audience of approximately one billion mobile viewers. VML addresses global mobile distribution of LIVE and Video on Demand (“VOD”) content as a white label Software as a Service (“SaaS”).


VML OTT live streaming technology is similar to what you see with satellite TV such as Dish Network and DirecTV, as well as cable companies. Almost all currently existing live streaming cannot do live broadcast

Table of Contents  

streaming at this level and usually has anywhere from 1 minute to 10 minute delays or continuous buffering, never loading the video. With VML, there is the ability to have “worldwide” access for a live streaming event equal to standard television broadcasting with tens of millions of simultaneous users. We believe that VML is the first technology to be able to achieve this level of live streaming. In emerging countries that do not have fiber, cable and satellite TV, access to VML is simple and cost effective, as long as there is a cellular connection on a 3G network or higher (regardless of provider) [1] . VML aims to provide uninterrupted live streaming on mobile devices without buffering, crashes, pixilation, or audio and video syncing issues. One practical application of this technology is that a viewer can move from a Wi--Fi connection to a 3G connection without interruption. VML has a unique user interface with multi--channel access and built-in social media, and we believe it is unlike anything currently on the market. VML also has the capability to do a Live Linear Broadcast with VOD.VML’s technology has the potential to reduce web content pirating since high quality TV broadcast is now easily accessed worldwide on mobile devices.


Currently, we believe we are the only company that does all the above in the industry and we believe VML has the potential to expand our technologies and applications even further.


The hottest technology in the over the top (“OTT”) market and the biggest challenge in the OTT market is “Live Linear Channel Broadcasting” and “Live Event Broadcasting” to equal standard television broadcasting on cable and satellite TV. This type of technology is superior to video on demand (VOD) streaming technology in both acquisition and delivery. The growth of OTT video delivery has been significant. In the past year alone, OTT has grown to $35 billion in global revenue, with $17 billion coming from emerging markets source Digital TV Research. Viewme Live (“VML”) has many technology advantages including: Artificial Intelligence (“AI”); the ability to simultaneously access millions of users simultaneously with virtually no latency equivalent to standard television broadcasting; global distribution (without interruption) on cellular and Wi--Fi; and a fully interactive menu user interface and worldwide advertising brokers in place.


VML’s content delivery network (“CDN”) can potentially reach tens of millions of mobile devices (tablets and smartphones) and has the potential to scale to one billion video streams globally. It loads content within seconds, not only for Wi-Fi, but also more importantly, on cellular networks that are 3G and higher. VML’s core technology is fully developed and is able to support clients on a turnkey native mobile app in less than 60 days. We have already achieved major milestones as the world’s largest private conduit build out for global deployment of LIVE and VOD streaming content. Our OTT live streaming technology is unique and proprietary. Here are some highlights on how VML can help from telecommunication companies to TV station broadcasters to digital film libraries.


VML has the ability to create a “Master Network Mobile App” that can allow for a multiple channel build out, each with its own unique Pay Per View charge (optional). This means a company can have a live event channel per country with a different price per user based on the economics of that country. VML has unlimited channel build out (e.g. a company could have 50 channels or 1000 channels). Any telecommunications company can have professional looking displays and user interfaces for mobile with VML, similar to what the large telecommunications companies provide. A Master Network App also allows a network to expand into other categories by country (e.g. additional sports categories for various sports by country). Expansion can focus on audience aggregation for sports and other forms of entertainment categories. Pay-Per View is an option for these expanded categories as well. We have built-in worldwide ad brokers for pre---roll commercial ads so that revenue can be generated as soon as possible. There is also potential to upsell to existing advertisers and sponsors and it can be brand specific by country.


Our differentiation from webstreaming


We are not a website based video streaming technology. VML is strictly a native mobile app focused on video streaming technology for mobile platforms. We are not a dashboard based video content company where users upload content; we are a complete turnkey SaaS application. A survey released in May 2015, sponsored by Level 3 Communications, stated, “Offering both VOD and Live Linear channels will be critical for OTT providers to entice new prospects and gain market share. This trend is a critical one. For existing OTT providers, offering a VOD service may not be enough to maintain, much less grow, market share.” The trend towards adding live linear channel content has the potential to become “table stakes” in the OTT game over the next several years, with both breaking


[1] Subject to the laws and regulations of each country.

Table of Contents  

news and live sports content leading the way in terms of interest for OTT service providers adding live linear channels.


SaaS White Label


We plan to white label our suite of SaaS technologies for yearly licensing and monthly maintenance fees. The prospective user base for the SaaS White Label Suite is extensive as there are more than 200,000 TV broadcasters worldwide alone, and many of them are seeking to migrate to the vast mobile video streaming market space. The sizeable population of potential SaaS clients includes standard television broadcasters in every country, direct marketing companies, low-powered antenna broadcasters (such as universities and churches), IPTV broadcasters, and large content (film and TV) providers that are seeking to further monetize their properties for worldwide syndication.


The SaaS suite includes full app development on Apple iOS, Google Android and Roku connected boxes, user interface (menu system), advertising broker network for pre---roll commercial ads (from date of launch), 24/7 LIVE monitoring of inbound and outbound signals, data analytics, seamless updating to all platforms, Amazon web service (AWS) blade servers, and coverage up to the first 20 million streams. The white label product is offered to stand--alone.

User Interface

In a preprogrammed live linear broadcast application, viewers have free access via a p laylist b y cat e g o ry a n d have the ability to “catc h -- up w ith wh at t h ey m ay h ave m iss e d in t h e LI V E b r oad cast, regar d l e ss o f its o riginal air d ate. Th e vide o - on - d e m a n d ( VOD ) feature provides the opportunity to access a dd iti on al vi ewe rs a n d m on etiz e past content. After several years in development, we believe that VML has a significant first to market advantage and that no other companies currently have a comparable commercialized offering.


VML has also been developed and customized for the mobile streaming technology of Viki, a Korean Pop TV content provider. Ten months post--launch, Viki reached 50 million installed apps for mobile devices and attracted 22 million users in approximately 200 countries. This rapid scalability was one factor in Viki’s acquisition by Rakuten for $200 million.





Our Plan for Strategic Partnering with Telecommunication & Media Companies


Currently in the world, viewers usually need to have a contract with a cable provider (e.g. AT&T, Cox, Xfinity, Spectrum, or Cablevision in the U.S.) or satellite TV provider (e.g. DirecTV and D ISH N et wo rk in the U.S.) a n d b e in ra n ge o f a r e si den tial o r bu si ne ss W i-Fi to b e a b le to w atch o v e r t h e t o p ( OT T) content on a connected TV device, website or mobile access. VML is capable of offering a nearly unlimited number of channels to mobile users virtually anywhere and everywhere, with global reach, far exceeding two U.S. satellite companies (DirecTV and DISH Network), which have 500+ channels each and are only available in the U.S.

Table of Contents  


We believe VML will immediately appeal to any channel that is currently on DirecTV and DISH Network for global mobile linear broadcast participation, simply because these platforms are only available in the U.S. market.


VML can p r o vi d e lo w -- powe r e d TV st a ti on s (after f oun d in c hu rc he s a n d un iv e rsiti e s), al on g w ith h igh-- powe r e d stations, the ability to reach the entire global market. Other potential users are owners of libraries of digitized content, and LIVE event venues such as music concerts, sporting events, festivals, beauty pageants, summer and winter Olympic Games, award shows, red carpet events, trade shows and conventions. Enthusiasts can produce their own show in any area and could launch their own channels for travel, food, spirits, sports, outdoor recreation, retro TV shows, children, cartoons, comedy, drama, reality, education, automobiles, health, corporations, shopping, soap opera, game shows, dating, religion, etc., providing extensive possibilities for media expansion. Content providers will not be limited by the major TV networks and film studios for distribution rights.


We have targeted Telecommunication and Media Company Opportunities to offer:

· Turn key mobile app for telecommunication and media companies for immediate distribution of TV broadcasts on terrestrial, cable and satellite for free or as subscription.
· Turn key mobile app for free or pay per view live events.
· Turn key mobile app for digital libraries of content providers.
· Reseller program with territorial rights.
· Worldwide analytics on mobile TV content provided to help with target marketing for products and services.
· Transitions to the automotive industry car play systems.
· Option to p re---load M aster N et wo rk Ap p o n tel e c o mm un icati o n c o m p a ny’s m o bile de v ices s u ch as s m art phones and tablets.
· P re-load t h e SaaS wh ite la b el clie n ts o n tel e c o mm un icati o n c o m p a n y m o bile d evices.



Geo Fencing Available (The ability to offer broadcast territories by region or regional Networks)

Our Plan to Act as a Reseller with Territorial Rights

· Value Added Reseller (VAR) to telecommunication and media companies.
· Exclusive rights for a country or region for reselling the white label opportunity.
· Offer to Telecommunication and media companies OTT digital content as a channel or network.
· Offer 1 to 1000 channels by territory.
· Approach emerging markets as capital resources permit.




Table of Contents  


Our business is subject to a number of risks of which you should be aware before making an investment decision. These risks are discussed more fully in the “Risk Factors” section of this prospectus immediately following this the summary.


Our Corporate Information


We are a Florida corporation. Our principal executive offices are located at 501 W. Broadway, Suite 800, San Diego, CA 92101, and our telephone number is (619) 400-4996. Our website address is http://www.tptglobaltech.com. Information on or accessed through our website is not incorporated into this prospectus and is not a part of this prospectus.


Our Capital Budget for the next 12 months


    /---------------4th Qtr 2017 Agreements -------------/ Proposed      
  SaaS /---------------Content-----------/ /--------------Network-------------/ Phone General  
Initial Uses of Funds:       Proposed        
  San Diego Media HRS Blue Collar  Viewme Live Proposed Acquistion Lion Phone 4K Units General 2018 Acq Totals
Est. Build-Out Costs-Complex  $               -         $              2,000,000        $    2,000,000
 Studio  Equip    $    1,000,000    $              2,500,000        $    3,500,000
2nd Used Broadcast Truck     $       600,000            $       600,000
Hardware Manufacturing            $      500,000    $       500,000
Viewme Live Completion         $                 500,000        $       500,000
Initial Capx  $               -     $    1,600,000  $                    -     $              5,000,000  $                    -     $      500,000  $               -     $    7,100,000
 Down Payment Cash for Acquisitions         5750000  $      400,000    $    6,150,000
Seller Note Retirement   $     250,000  $    1,965,000  $        1,600,000  $              4,000,000  $       4,250,000      $  12,065,000
Marketing  Budget         $              1,000,000 250000       1,000,000          250,000  $    2,500,000
General Working Capital  $     100,000            $   1,000,000  $    1,100,000
Real Estate Acquisiton        $              5,000,000        $    5,000,000
Total Project  Cost    $     350,000  $    3,565,000  $        1,600,000  $            15,000,000  $     10,250,000  $   1,900,000  $   1,250,000  $  33,915,000





Like other large telecommunications companies, we are a constant target of cyber-attacks of varying degrees, which has caused us to spend increasingly more time and money to deal with increasingly sophisticated attacks. Some of the attacks may result in security breaches, and we periodically notify our customers, our employees or the public of these breaches when necessary or appropriate. None of these resulting security breaches to date have materially adversely affected our business, results of operations or financial condition.


We rely on several other communications companies to provide services or products for our offerings. We may lease a significant portion of our core fiber network from our competitors and other third parties. Many of these leases will lapse in future years. Our future ability to provide services on the terms of our current offerings will depend in part upon our ability to renew or replace these leases, agreements and arrangements on terms substantially similar to those currently in effect.


For additional information regarding our systems, network, cyber risks, capital expenditure requirements and reliance upon third parties, see "Risk Factors."


Table of Contents  







We compete in a rapidly evolving and highly competitive market, and we expect intense competition to continue. In addition to competition from larger national telecommunications providers, we are facing increasing competition from several other sources, including cable and satellite companies, wireless providers, technology companies, cloud companies, broadband providers, device providers, resellers, sales agents and facilities-based providers using their own networks as well as those leasing parts of our network. Technological advances and regulatory and legislative changes have increased opportunities for a wide range of alternative communications service providers, which in turn have increased competitive pressures on our business. These alternate providers often face fewer regulations and have lower cost structures than we do. In addition, the communications industry has, in recent years, experienced substantial consolidation, and some of our competitors in one or more lines of our business are generally larger, have stronger brand names, have more financial and business resources and have broader service offerings than we currently do.


Wireless telephone services are a significant source of competition with our legacy carrier services. It is increasingly common for customers to completely forego use of traditional wireline phone service and instead rely solely on wireless service for voice services. We anticipate this trend will continue, particularly as our older customers are replaced over time with younger customers who are less accustomed to using traditional wireline voice services. Technological and regulatory developments in wireless services, Wi-Fi, and other wired and wireless technologies have contributed to the development of alternatives to traditional landline voice services. Moreover, the growing prevalence of electronic mail, text messaging, social networking and similar digital non-voice communications services continues to reduce the demand for traditional landline voice services. These factors have led to a long-term systemic decline in the number of our wireline voice service customers.


The Telecommunications Act of 1996, which obligates carriers to permit competitors to interconnect their facilities to the carrier's network and to take various other steps that are designed to promote competition, imposes several duties on a carrier if it receives a specific request from another entity which seeks to connect with or provide services using the carrier's network. In addition, each carrier is obligated to (i) negotiate interconnection agreements in good faith, (ii) provide nondiscriminatory "unbundled" access to all aspects of the carrier's network, (iii) offer resale of its telecommunications services at wholesale rates and (iv) permit competitors, on terms and conditions (including rates) that are just, reasonable and nondiscriminatory, to colocate their physical plant on the carrier's property, or provide virtual colocation if physical colocation is not practicable. Current FCC rules require carriers to lease a network element only in those situations where competing carriers genuinely would be impaired without access to such network elements, and where the unbundling would not interfere with the development of facilities-based competition.


As a result of these regulatory, consumer and technological developments, carriers also face competition from competitive local exchange carriers, or CLECs, particularly in densely populated areas. CLECs provide competing services through reselling a carrier’s local services, through use of a carrier's unbundled network elements or through their own facilities.


Technological developments have led to the development of new products and services that have reduced the demand for our traditional services, as noted above, or that compete with traditional carrier services. Technological improvements have enabled cable television companies to provide traditional circuit-switched telephone service over their cable networks, and several national cable companies have aggressively marketed these services. Similarly, companies providing VoIP services provide voice communication services over the Internet which compete with our traditional telephone service and our own VoIP services. In addition, demand for our broadband services could be adversely affected by advanced wireless data transmission technologies being deployed by wireless providers and by certain technologies permitting cable companies and other competitors to deliver faster average broadband transmission speeds than ours.


Table of Contents  

Similar to us, many cable, technology or other communications companies that previously offered a limited range of services are now offering diversified bundles of services, either through their own networks, reselling arrangements or joint ventures. As such, a growing number of companies are competing to serve the communications needs of the same customer base. Such activities will continue to place downward pressure on the demand for and pricing of our services.


As customers increasingly demand high-speed connections for entertainment, communications and productivity, we expect the demands on our network will continue to increase over the next several years. To succeed, we must continue to invest in our networks or engage partners to ensure that they can deliver competitive services that meet these increasing bandwidth and speed requirements. In addition, network reliability and security are increasingly important competitive factors in our business.


Additional information about competitive pressures is located under the heading “Risk Factors.”




In connection with providing strategic services to our business customers, which includes our small, medium and enterprise business, wholesale and governmental customers, we compete against other telecommunication providers, as well as other regional and national carriers, other data transport providers, cable companies, CLECs and other enterprises, some of whom are substantially larger than us. Competition is based on price, bandwidth, quality and speed of service, promotions and bundled offerings. In providing broadband services, we compete primarily with cable companies, wireless providers, technology companies and other broadband service providers. We face competition in Ethernet based services in the wholesale market from cable companies and fiber based providers.


Our competitors for providing integrated data, broadband, voice services and other data services to our business customers range from small to mid-sized businesses. Due to the size of some of these companies, our competitors may be able to offer more inexpensive solutions to our customers. To compete, we focus on providing sophisticated, secure and performance-driven services to our business customers through our infrastructure.


The number of companies providing business services has grown and increased competition for these services, particularly with respect to smaller business customers. Many of our competitors for strategic services are not subject to the same regulatory requirements as we are and therefore they are able to avoid significant regulatory costs and obligations.


Government Regulation




As discussed further below, our operations are subject to significant local, state, federal and foreign laws and regulations.


We are subject to the significant regulations by the FCC, which regulates interstate communications, and state utility commissions, which regulate intrastate communications. These agencies (i) issue rules to protect consumers and promote competition, (ii) set the rates that telecommunication companies charge each other for exchanging traffic, and (iii) have traditionally developed and administered support programs designed to subsidize the provision of services to high-cost rural areas. In most states, local voice service, switched and special access services and interconnection services are subject to price regulation, although the extent of regulation varies by type of service and geographic region. In addition, we are required to maintain licenses with the FCC and with state utility commissions. Laws and regulations in many states restrict the manner in which a licensed entity can interact with affiliates, transfer assets, issue debt and engage in other business activities. Many acquisitions and divestitures may require approval by the FCC and some state commissions. These agencies typically have the authority to withhold their approval, or to request or impose substantial conditions upon the transacting parties in connection with granting their approvals.


Table of Contents  

The following description discusses some of the major industry regulations that may affect our traditional operations, but numerous other regulations not discussed below could also impact us. Some legislation and regulations are currently the subject of judicial, legislative and administrative proceedings which could substantially change the manner in which the telecommunications industry operates and the amount of revenues we receive for our services. Neither the outcome of these proceedings, nor their potential impact on us, can be predicted at this time. For additional information, see "Risk Factors."


The laws and regulations governing our affairs are quite complex and occasionally in conflict with each other. From time to time, we are fined for failing to meet applicable regulations or service requirements.


Federal Regulation




We are required to comply with the Communications Act of 1934. Among other things, this law requires our local exchange carriers to offer various of our legacy services at just and reasonable rates and on non-discriminatory terms. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 materially amended the Communications Act of 1934, primarily to promote competition.


The FCC regulates interstate services we provide, including the special access charges we bill for wholesale network transmission and the interstate access charges that we bill to long-distance companies and other communications companies in connection with the origination and termination of interstate phone calls. Additionally, the FCC regulates a number of aspects of our business related to privacy, homeland security and network infrastructure, including our access to and use of local telephone numbers and our provision of emergency 911 services. The FCC has responsibility for maintaining and administering support programs designed to expand nationwide access to communications services (which are described further below), as well as other programs supporting service to low-income households, schools and libraries, and rural health care providers. Changes in the composition of the five members of the FCC or its Chairman can have significant impacts on the regulation of our business.


In recent years, our operations and those of other telecommunications carriers have been further impacted by legislation and regulation imposing additional obligations on us, particularly with regards to providing voice and broadband service, bolstering homeland security, increasing disaster recovery requirements, minimizing environmental impacts and enhancing privacy. These laws include the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, and laws governing local telephone number portability and customer proprietary network information requirements. In addition, the FCC has heightened its focus on the reliability of emergency 911 services. The FCC has imposed fines on us and other companies for 911 outages and has adopted new compliance requirements for providing 911 service. We are incurring capital and operating expenses designed to comply with the FCC's new requirements and minimize future outages. All of these laws and regulations may cause us to incur additional costs and could impact our ability to compete effectively against companies not subject to the same regulations.


Over the past several years, the FCC has taken various actions and initiated certain proceedings designed to comprehensively evaluate the proper regulation of the provisions of data services to businesses. As part of its evaluation, the FCC has reviewed the rates, terms and conditions under which these services are provided. The FCC's proceedings remain pending, and their ultimate impact on us is currently unknown.


Table of Contents  

Telephony Services


We operate traditional telecommunications services in our Arizona subsidiary, and those services are largely governed under rules established for CLECs under the Communications Act. The Communications Act entitles our CLEC subsidiary to certain rights, but as telecommunications carriers, it also subjects them to regulation by the FCC and the states. Their designation as telecommunications carriers also results in other regulations that may affect them and the services they offer.


Interconnection and Intercarrier Compensation 


The Communications Act requires telecommunications carriers to interconnect directly or indirectly with other telecommunications carriers. Under the FCC's intercarrier compensation rules, we are entitled, in some cases, to compensation from carriers when they use our network to terminate or originate calls and in other cases are required to compensate another carrier for using its network to originate or terminate traffic. The FCC and state regulatory commissions, including those in the states in which we operate, have adopted limits on the amounts of compensation that may be charged for certain types of traffic. As noted above, the FCC has determined that intercarrier compensation for all terminating traffic will be phased down over several years to a "bill-and-keep" regime, with no compensation between carriers for most terminating traffic by 2018, and is considering further reform that could reduce or eliminate compensation for originating traffic as well.


Universal Service


Our CLEC subsidiary is required to contribute to the USF. The amount of universal service contribution required of us is based on a percentage of revenues earned from interstate and international services provided to end users. We allocate our end user revenues and remit payments to the universal service fund in accordance with FCC rules. The FCC has ruled that states may impose state universal service fees on CLEC telecommunications services


State Regulation


Our CLEC subsidiary telecommunications services are subject to regulation by state commissions in each state where we provide services. In order to provide our services, we must seek approval from the state regulatory commission or be registered to provide services in each state where we operate and may at times require local approval to construct facilities. Regulatory obligations vary from state to state and include some or all of the following requirements: filing tariffs (rates, terms and conditions); filing operational, financial, and customer service reports; seeking approval to transfer the assets or capital stock of the broadband communications company; seeking approval to issue stocks, bonds and other forms of indebtedness of the broadband communications company; reporting customer service and quality of service requirements; outage reporting; making contributions to state universal service support programs; paying regulatory and state Telecommunications Relay Service and E911 fees; geographic build-out; and other matters relating to competition.


Other Regulations 


Our CLEC subsidiary telecommunications services are subject to other FCC requirements, including protecting the use and disclosure of customer proprietary network information; meeting certain notice requirements in the event of service termination; compliance with disabilities access requirements; compliance with CALEA standards; outage reporting; and the payment of fees to fund local number portability administration and the North American Numbering Plan. As noted above, the FCC and states are examining whether new requirements are necessary to improve the resiliency of communications networks. Communications with our customers are also subject to FCC, FTC and state regulations on telemarketing and the sending of unsolicited commercial e-mail and fax messages, as well as additional privacy and data security requirements.




        Regulatory Classification.     Broadband Internet access services were traditionally classified by the FCC as "information services" for regulatory purposes, a type of service that is subject to a lesser degree of regulation than

Table of Contents  

"telecommunications services." In 2015, the FCC reversed this determination and classified broadband Internet access services as "telecommunications services." This reclassification has subjected our broadband Internet access service to greater regulation, although the FCC did not apply all telecommunications service obligations to broadband Internet access service. The 2015 Order could have a material adverse impact on our business as it may justify additional FCC regulation or support efforts by States to justify additional regulation of broadband Internet access services. In December 2017, the FCC adopted an order that in large part reverses the 2015 Order and reestablishes the "information service" classification for broadband Internet access service. The 2017 Order has not yet gone into effect, however, and the 2015 Order will remain binding until the 2017 Order takes effect. The 2017 Order is expected to be subject to legal challenge that may delay its effect or overturn it.


        Net Neutrality.     The 2015 Order also established a new "Open Internet" framework that expanded disclosure requirements on Internet service providers ("ISPs") such as cable companies, prohibited blocking, throttling, and paid prioritization of Internet traffic on the basis of the content, and imposed a "general conduct standard" that prohibits unreasonable interference with the ability of end users and edge providers to reach each other. The FCC's 2017 Order eliminates these rules except for certain disclosure requirements. As noted above, however, we cannot be certain when or if the 2017 Order will take effect. Additionally, Congress and some states are considering legislation that may codify "network neutrality" rules.


        Access for Persons with Disabilities.     The FCC's rules require us to ensure that persons with disabilities have access to "advanced communications services" ("ACS"), such as electronic messaging and interoperable video conferencing. They also require that certain pay television programming delivered via Internet Protocol include closed captioning and require entities distributing such programming to end users to pass through such captions and identify programming that should be captioned.


        Other Regulation.     The 2015 Order also subjected broadband providers' Internet traffic exchange rates and practices to potential FCC oversight and created a mechanism for third parties to file complaints regarding these matters. In addition, our provision of Internet services also subjects us to the limitations on use and disclosure of user communications and records contained in the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986. Broadband Internet access service is also subject to other federal and state privacy laws applicable to electronic communications.


        Additionally, providers of broadband Internet access services must comply with CALEA, which requires providers to make their services and facilities accessible for law enforcement intercept requests. Various other federal and state laws apply to providers of services that are accessible through broadband Internet access service, including copyright laws, telemarketing laws, prohibitions on obscenity, and a ban on unsolicited commercial e-mail, and privacy and data security laws. Online content we provide is also subject to some of these laws.


        Other forms of regulation of broadband Internet access service currently being considered by the FCC, Congress or state legislatures include consumer protection requirements, cyber security requirements, consumer service standards, requirements to contribute to universal service programs and requirements to protect personally identifiable customer data from theft. Pending and future legislation in this area could adversely affect our operations as an Internet service provider and our relationship with our Internet customers.


        Additionally, from time to time the FCC and Congress have considered whether to subject broadband Internet access services to the federal Universal Service Fund ("USF") contribution requirements. Any contribution requirements adopted for Internet access services would impose significant new costs on our broadband Internet service. At the same time, the FCC is changing the manner in which Universal Service funds are distributed. By focusing on broadband and wireless deployment, rather than traditional telephone service, the changes could assist some of our competitors in more effectively competing with our service offerings.


Table of Contents  

VoIP Services


        We provide telephony services using VoIP technology ("interconnected VoIP"). The FCC has adopted several regulations for interconnected VoIP services, as have several states, especially as it relates to core customer and safety issues such as e911, local number portability, disability access, outage reporting, universal service contributions, and regulatory reporting requirements. The FCC has not, however, formally classified interconnected VoIP services as either information services or telecommunications services. In this vacuum, some states have asserted more expansive rights to regulate interconnected VoIP services, while others have adopted laws that bar the state commission from regulating VoIP service.


        Universal Service.     Interconnected VoIP services must contribute to the USF used to subsidize communication services provided to low income households, to customers in rural and high cost areas, and to schools, libraries, and rural health care providers. The amount of universal service contribution required of interconnected VoIP service providers is based on a percentage of revenues earned from interstate and international services provided to end users. We allocate our end user revenues and remit payments to the universal service fund in accordance with FCC rules. The FCC has ruled that states may impose state universal service fees on interconnected VoIP providers.


        Local Number Portability.     The FCC requires interconnected VoIP service providers and their "numbering partners" to ensure that their customers have the ability to port their telephone numbers when changing providers. We also contribute to federal funds to meet the shared costs of local number portability and the costs of North American Numbering Plan Administration.


        Intercarrier Compensation.     In an October 2011 reform order and subsequent clarifying orders, the FCC revised the regime governing payments among providers of telephony services for the exchange of calls between and among different networks ("intercarrier compensation") to, among other things, explicitly include interconnected VoIP. In that Order, the FCC determined that intercarrier compensation for all terminating traffic, including VoIP traffic exchanged in TDM format, will be phased down over several years to a "bill-and-keep" regime, with no compensation between carriers for

most terminating traffic by 2018. The FCC is considering further reform in this area, which could reduce or eliminate compensation for originating traffic as well.


        Other Regulation.     Interconnected VoIP service providers are required to provide enhanced 911 emergency services to their customers; protect customer proprietary network information from unauthorized disclosure to third parties; report to the FCC on service outages; comply with telemarketing regulations and other privacy and data security requirements; comply with disabilities access requirements and service discontinuance obligations; comply with call signaling requirements; and comply with CALEA standards. In August 2015, the FCC adopted new rules to improve the resiliency of the communications network. Under the new rules, providers of telephony services, including interconnected VoIP service providers, must make available eight hours of standby backup power for consumers to purchase at the point of sale. The rules also require that providers inform new and current customers about service limitations during power outages and steps that consumers can take to address those risks.



For additional information about these matters, see “Risk Factors.”




Arizona CLEC license in Phoenix area. License #20090393 which expires 2023 and is renewable every seven years.






Table of Contents  



We currently have no backlogs of orders for sales, at this time.




We have no government contracts.




We are not conducting any research.




We have 37 employees who work approximately 45 hours per week. All officers and directors work approximately 60 hours per week as directors.







(a) Real Estate. None.
(b) Title to properties. None.
(c) Patents, Trade Names, Trademarks and Copyrights See below.



Our executive offices are located in San Diego, California. We do not own any real property, but lease and office space consisting of approximately 27,000 sq. ft. among all of our corporate and subsidiary locations. We believe that substantially all of our property and equipment is in good condition, subject to normal wear and tear, and that our facilities have sufficient capacity to meet the current needs of our business.




Either directly or through our subsidiaries, we have rights in various patents, trade names, trademarks, copyrights and other intellectual property necessary to conduct our business. Our services often use the intellectual property of others, including licensed software. We also occasionally license our intellectual property to others as we deem appropriate. Please see Patent Assignment attached as Exhibit 99.2 to this Registration Statement.


We periodically receive offers from third parties to purchase or obtain licenses for patents and other intellectual property rights in exchange for royalties or other payments. We also periodically receive notices, or are named in lawsuits, alleging that our products or services infringe on patents or other intellectual property rights of third parties. In certain instances, these matters can potentially adversely impact our operations, operating results or financial position. For additional information, see “Risk Factors”.




We may be subject to various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business from time to time. We believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters, whether individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.


Table of Contents  

At this time, the Company has been named in a lawsuit, Robert Serrett vs. TruCom, Inc., by a former employee who was terminated by management in 2016. The employee was working under an employment agreement but was terminated for breach of the agreement. The former employee is suing for breach of contract and is seeking around $75,000 in back pay and benefits. Management believes it has good and meritorious defenses and does not belief the outcome of the lawsuit will have any material effect on the financial position of the Company.


At the end of December 2017, the Company learned that the new equipment lease identified in Note 7 for $101,348 was included in a default judgement in a non-jurisdictional state of Pennsylvania for $169,474 from a lawsuit by the lessor. Management is working with the lessor to settle this matter including a proposal for the equipment to be returned to the lessor and then a negotiated amount for any deficiency between the value given for the retired equipment and the $101,348. When concluded, management does not believe the results will be significantly different than the liability of $101,348 recorded as of September 30, 2017.


As of the date of this filing, the Company has collected $338,725 from one customer in excess of amounts due from that customer in accordance with the customer’s understanding of the appropriate billings activity. The customer has filed a written demand for repayment by the Company of these amounts. Management believes that the customer agreement allows them to keep the amounts under dispute. Given the dispute, the Company has reflected the amounts in dispute as a customer liability on the consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 and does not believe the outcome of the dispute will have a material effect on the financial position of the Company.




Market Information


Currently there is a limited public trading market for our stock on the OTC Pink Sheets under the symbol TPTG.


Rules Governing Low-price Stocks That May Affect Our Shareholders' Ability to Resell Shares of Our Common Stock


Our stock currently is traded on the OTC Pink Sheets under the symbol TPTG.


Quotations on the OTC Pink Sheets reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown or commission and may not reflect actual transactions. Our common stock will be subject to certain rules adopted by the SEC that regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in “penny stocks.” Penny stocks generally are securities with a price of less than $5.00, other than securities registered on certain national exchanges or quoted on the NASDAQ system, provided that the exchange or system provides current price and volume information with respect to transaction in such securities. The additional sales practice and disclosure requirements imposed upon broker-dealers are and may discourage broker-dealers from effecting transactions in our shares which could severely limit the market liquidity of the shares and impede the sale of shares in the secondary market.


The penny stock rules require broker-dealers, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to make a special suitability determination for the purchaser to receive the purchaser’s written consent to the transaction prior to sale, to deliver standardized risk disclosure documents prepared by the SEC that provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer must also provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock. In addition, the penny stock regulations require the broker-dealer to deliver, prior to any transaction involving a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prepared by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, unless the broker-dealer or the transaction is otherwise exempt. A broker-dealer is also required to disclose commissions payable to the broker-dealer and the registered representative and current quotations for the securities. Finally, a broker-dealer is required to send monthly statements disclosing recent price information with respect to the penny stock held in a customer's account and information with respect to the limited market in penny stocks.

Table of Contents  



As of the filing of this prospectus, we have 410 shareholders of record of our common stock. Sales under Rule 144 are also subject to manner of sale provisions and notice requirements and to the availability of current public information about us. Under Rule 144, a person who has not been an affiliate at any time during the three months preceding a sale, and who has beneficially owned the shares proposed to be sold for at least 6 months, is entitled to sell shares without complying with the manner of sale, volume limitation or notice provisions of Rule 144.


As of the date of this prospectus, our shareholders hold 136,953,904 shares, 36,953,025 of which may be sold pursuant to this Registration Statement.




As of the filing of this prospectus, we have not paid any dividends to shareholders. There are no restrictions which would limit our ability to pay dividends on common equity or that are likely to do so in the future. The Florida Revised Statutes, however, do prohibit us from declaring dividends where, after giving effect to the distribution of the dividend; we would not be able to pay our debts as they become due in the usual course of business; or our total assets would be less than the sum of the total liabilities plus the amount that would be needed to satisfy the rights of shareholders who have preferential rights superior to those receiving the distribution.




The following is a complete list of the financial statements filed as a part of this Report.

Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2016 and 2015
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm F- 2
Consolidated Balance F- 3 -F- 4
Consolidated Statement of Operations F- 5
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) F- 6 -F- 7
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows F- 8-F-9
Notes to the Financial Statements F- 10 -F-2 7


Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of September 30, 2017


Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets F- 29 -F- 30
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations F-3 1
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows F- 32
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements F- 33 -F- 45





Table of Contents  

TPT Global Tech, Inc. and Subsidiaries


Consolidated Financial Statements


As of


December 31, 2016 and 2015




Table of Contents  

TPT Global Tech, Inc. and Subsidiaries


Consolidated Financial Statements


As of


December 31, 2016 and 2015



  Table of Contents





Consolidated Financial Statements




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




Consolidated Balance Sheets


F-3 - F-4


Consolidated Statements of Operations




Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity


F-5 - F-6


Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows


F-8 - F-9


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

























F- 1  
Table of Contents  






To the Board of Directors and Management of TPT Global Tech, Inc.


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of TPT Global Tech, Inc. (“the Company”) as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two year period ended December 31, 2016. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of TPT Global Tech, Inc. as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two year period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has recorded net losses during recent years and does not have sufficient cash flows from operations to supporting working capital needs. These factors raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 3. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.