UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 __________________________________________________
FORM 10-Q
   __________________________________________________ 
(Mark One)
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011
OR
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     
Commission file number: 001-14901
  __________________________________________________
CONSOL Energy Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
 
51-0337383
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
1000 CONSOL Energy Drive
Canonsburg, PA 15317-6506
(724) 485-4000
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)
 __________________________________________________ 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes   x     No   o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes   x     No   o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer   x     Accelerated filer   o     Non-accelerated filer   o     Smaller Reporting Company   o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes   o     No   x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date.
Class
 
Shares outstanding as of October 19, 2011
Common stock, $0.01 par value
 
226,821,506
 



TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
 
Page
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
 
 
 
ITEM 1.
Condensed Financial Statements
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ITEM 2.
 
 
 
ITEM 3.
 
 
 
ITEM 4.
 
 
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
 
 
 
 
ITEM 1.
 
 
 
Risk Factors
 
 
 
ITEM 5.
 
 
 
ITEM 6.



PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
ITEM 1.
CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONSOL ENERGY INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
September 30,
 
September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
Sales—Outside
$
1,421,689

 
$
1,260,499

 
$
4,293,167

 
$
3,650,129

Sales—Gas Royalty Interests
17,083

 
18,131

 
52,191

 
46,621

Sales—Purchased Gas
1,155

 
3,524

 
3,297

 
8,280

Freight—Outside
59,871

 
37,269

 
156,311

 
96,544

Other Income
21,931

 
29,870

 
70,068

 
77,126

Total Revenue and Other Income
1,521,729

 
1,349,293

 
4,575,034

 
3,878,700

Cost of Goods Sold and Other Operating Charges (exclusive of depreciation, depletion and amortization shown below)
879,268

 
850,819

 
2,620,376

 
2,436,452

Transaction and Financing Fees
14,907

 
337

 
14,907

 
64,415

Loss on Debt Extinguishment

 

 
16,090

 

Gas Royalty Interests Costs
15,409

 
16,408

 
46,582

 
40,133

Purchased Gas Costs
398

 
3,333

 
2,850

 
6,980

Freight Expense
59,871

 
37,269

 
156,122

 
96,544

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
46,692

 
38,722

 
130,311

 
107,897

Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
159,750

 
161,429

 
466,612

 
413,379

Abandonment of Long-Lived Assets
338

 

 
115,817

 

Interest Expense
58,884

 
66,430

 
189,963

 
139,613

Taxes Other Than Income
85,790

 
83,406

 
265,121

 
243,831

Total Costs
1,321,307

 
1,258,153

 
4,024,751

 
3,549,244

Earnings Before Income Taxes
200,422

 
91,140

 
550,283

 
329,456

Income Taxes
33,093

 
15,757

 
113,421

 
75,291

Net Income
167,329

 
75,383

 
436,862

 
254,165

Less: Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest

 

 

 
(11,845
)
Net Income Attributable to CONSOL Energy Inc. Shareholders
$
167,329

 
$
75,383

 
$
436,862

 
$
242,320

Earnings Per Share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
$
0.74

 
$
0.33

 
$
1.93

 
$
1.15

Dilutive
$
0.73

 
$
0.33

 
$
1.91

 
$
1.13

Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
226,744,011

 
225,781,539

 
226,582,226

 
211,235,893

Dilutive
229,163,537

 
228,092,299

 
229,002,863

 
213,638,176

Dividends Paid Per Share
$
0.10

 
$
0.10

 
$
0.30

 
$
0.30

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


3



CONSOL ENERGY INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands)
 
 
(Unaudited)
 
 
 
September 30,
2011
 
December 31,
2010
ASSETS
 
 
 
Current Assets:
 
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
$
472,523

 
$
32,794

Accounts and Notes Receivable:
 
 
 
Trade
503,076

 
252,530

Other Receivables
331,614

 
21,589

Accounts Receivable—Securitized

 
200,000

Inventories
241,691

 
258,538

Deferred Income Taxes
157,247

 
174,171

Recoverable Income Taxes
11,504

 
32,528

Prepaid Expenses
184,263

 
142,856

Total Current Assets
1,901,918

 
1,115,006

Property, Plant and Equipment:
 
 
 
Property, Plant and Equipment
13,837,263

 
14,951,358

Less—Accumulated Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
4,766,163

 
4,822,107

Total Property, Plant and Equipment—Net
9,071,100

 
10,129,251

Other Assets:
 
 
 
Deferred Income Taxes
458,858

 
484,846

Restricted Cash
20,291

 
20,291

Investment in Affiliates
175,818

 
93,509

Other
535,063

 
227,707

Total Other Assets
1,190,030

 
826,353

TOTAL ASSETS
$
12,163,048

 
$
12,070,610
























The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


4



CONSOL ENERGY INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
 
 
(Unaudited)
 
 
 
September 30,
2011
 
December 31,
2010
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
 
 
 
Current Liabilities:
 
 
 
Accounts Payable
$
448,667

 
$
354,011

Short-Term Notes Payable

 
284,000

Current Portion of Long-Term Debt
20,306

 
24,783

Borrowings Under Securitization Facility

 
200,000

Other Accrued Liabilities
833,939

 
801,991

Total Current Liabilities
1,302,912

 
1,664,785

Long-Term Debt:
 
 
 
Long-Term Debt
3,123,434

 
3,128,736

Capital Lease Obligations
55,298

 
57,402

Total Long-Term Debt
3,178,732

 
3,186,138

Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities:
 
 
 
Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions
3,094,164

 
3,077,390

Pneumoconiosis Benefits
177,162

 
173,616

Mine Closing
401,049

 
393,754

Gas Well Closing
118,525

 
130,978

Workers’ Compensation
149,827

 
148,314

Salary Retirement
114,543

 
161,173

Reclamation
39,513

 
53,839

Other
159,878

 
144,610

Total Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities
4,254,661

 
4,283,674

TOTAL LIABILITIES
8,736,305

 
9,134,597

Stockholders’ Equity:
 
 
 
Common Stock, $.01 Par Value; 500,000,000 Shares Authorized, 227,289,426 Issued and 226,781,351 Outstanding at September 30, 2011; 227,289,426 Issued and 226,162,133 Outstanding at December 31, 2010
2,273

 
2,273

Capital in Excess of Par Value
2,219,783

 
2,178,604

Preferred Stock, 15,000,000 shares authorized, None issued and outstanding

 

Retained Earnings
2,025,794

 
1,680,597

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
(800,896
)
 
(874,338
)
Common Stock in Treasury, at Cost—508,075 Shares at September 30, 2011 and 1,127,293 Shares at December 31, 2010
(20,211
)
 
(42,659
)
Total CONSOL Energy Inc. Stockholders’ Equity
3,426,743

 
2,944,477

Noncontrolling Interest

 
(8,464
)
TOTAL EQUITY
3,426,743

 
2,936,013

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
$
12,163,048

 
$
12,070,610

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


5



CONSOL ENERGY INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
 
 
Common
Stock
 
Capital in
Excess
of Par
Value
 
Retained
Earnings
(Deficit)
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
(Loss)
 
Common
Stock in
Treasury
 
Total
CONSOL
Energy Inc.
Stockholders’
Equity
 
Non-
Controlling
Interest
 
Total
Equity
Balance at December 31, 2010
$
2,273

 
$
2,178,604

 
$
1,680,597

 
$
(874,338
)
 
$
(42,659
)
 
$
2,944,477

 
$
(8,464
)
 
$
2,936,013

(Unaudited)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net Income

 

 
436,862

 

 

 
436,862

 

 
436,862

Treasury Rate Lock (Net of $59 Tax)

 

 

 
(96
)
 

 
(96
)
 

 
(96
)
Gas Cash Flow Hedge (Net of $22,767 Tax)

 

 

 
35,702

 

 
35,702

 

 
35,702

Actuarially Determined Long-Term Liability Adjustments (Net of $23,547 Tax)

 

 

 
37,836

 

 
37,836

 

 
37,836

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

 
436,862

 
73,442

 

 
510,304

 

 
510,304

Issuance of Treasury Stock

 

 
(23,693
)
 

 
22,448

 
(1,245
)
 

 
(1,245
)
Tax Benefit From Stock-Based Compensation

 
4,096

 

 

 

 
4,096

 

 
4,096

Amortization of Stock-Based Compensation Awards

 
37,083

 

 

 

 
37,083

 

 
37,083

Net Change in Noncontrolling Interest

 

 

 

 

 

 
8,464

 
8,464

Dividends ($0.30 per share)

 

 
(67,972
)
 

 

 
(67,972
)
 

 
(67,972
)
Balance at September 30, 2011
$
2,273

 
$
2,219,783

 
$
2,025,794

 
$
(800,896
)
 
$
(20,211
)
 
$
3,426,743

 
$

 
$
3,426,743




























The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


6



CONSOL ENERGY INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
 
Nine Months Ended
 
September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
Operating Activities:
 
 
 
Net Income
$
436,862

 
$
254,165

Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities:
 
 
 
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
466,612

 
413,379

Abandonment of Long-Lived Assets
115,817

 

Stock-Based Compensation
37,083

 
33,580

Loss (Gain) on Sale of Assets
9,993

 
(8,475
)
Loss on Debt Extinguishment
16,090

 

Amortization of Mineral Leases
4,149

 
3,890

Deferred Income Taxes
120

 
3,372

Equity in Earnings of Affiliates
(19,989
)
 
(15,595
)
Changes in Operating Assets:
 
 
 
Accounts and Notes Receivable
(50,212
)
 
(66,840
)
Inventories
16,264

 
45,126

Prepaid Expenses
(611
)
 
(26,216
)
Changes in Other Assets
16,446

 
23,764

Changes in Operating Liabilities:
 
 
 
Accounts Payable
98,320

 
63,168

Other Operating Liabilities
66,589

 
109,371

Changes in Other Liabilities
29,432

 
14,051

Other
9,439

 
32,190

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
1,252,404

 
878,930

Investing Activities:
 
 
 
Capital Expenditures
(997,463
)
 
(821,908
)
Acquisition of Dominion Exploration and Production Business

 
(3,474,199
)
Purchase of CNX Gas Noncontrolling Interest

 
(991,034
)
Proceeds from Sales of Assets
695,291

 
24,944

Distributions from Equity Affiliates
70,860

 
6,867

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
(231,312
)
 
(5,255,330
)
Financing Activities:
 
 
 
Payments on Short-Term Borrowings
(284,000
)
 
(258,950
)
Payments on Miscellaneous Borrowings
(9,320
)
 
(8,564
)
(Payments on) Proceeds from Securitization Facility
(200,000
)
 
150,000

Payments on Long-Term Notes, Including Redemption Premium
(265,785
)
 

Proceeds from Issuance of Long-Term Notes
250,000

 
2,750,000

Tax Benefit from Stock-Based Compensation
5,034

 
9,926

Dividends Paid
(67,972
)
 
(63,276
)
Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock

 
1,828,862

Issuance of Treasury Stock
6,219

 
2,601

Debt Issuance and Financing Fees
(15,539
)
 
(84,224
)
Net Cash (Used In) Provided By Financing Activities
(581,363
)
 
4,326,375

Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
439,729

 
(50,025
)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period
32,794

 
65,607

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period
$
472,523

 
$
15,582

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


7



CONSOL ENERGY INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

NOTE 1—BASIS OF PRESENTATION:
The accompanying Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for future periods.
The balance sheet at December 31, 2010 has been derived from the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements at that date but does not include all the notes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. For further information, refer to the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes for the year ended December 31, 2010 included in CONSOL Energy Inc.'s Form 10-K.
Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted average shares outstanding during the reporting period. Dilutive earnings per share are computed similarly to basic earnings per share except that the weighted average shares outstanding are increased to include additional shares from the assumed exercise of stock options and performance stock options and the assumed vesting of restricted and performance stock units, if dilutive. The number of additional shares is calculated by assuming that outstanding stock options and performance share options were exercised, that outstanding restricted and performance share units were released, and that the proceeds from such activities were used to acquire shares of common stock at the average market price during the reporting period. CONSOL Energy Inc. (CONSOL Energy or Company) includes the impact of pro forma deferred tax assets in determining potential windfalls and shortfalls for purposes of calculating assumed proceeds under the treasury stock method. The table below sets forth the share-based awards that have been excluded from the computation of the diluted earnings per share because their effect would be anti-dilutive:
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
September 30,
 
September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
Anti-Dilutive Options
1,154,051

 
819,189

 
1,154,051

 
819,189

Anti-Dilutive Restricted Stock Units

 

 

 
1,960

Anti-Dilutive Performance Share Units
21,675

 

 

 

 
1,175,726

 
819,189

 
1,154,051

 
821,149


The table below sets forth the share-based awards that have been exercised or released:
 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
September 30,
 
September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
Options
72,254

 
23,562

 
311,003

 
146,555

Restricted Stock Units
20,589

 
35,355

 
424,958

 
340,699

Performance Share Units

 

 
40,752

 
109,955

 
92,843

 
58,917

 
776,713

 
597,209


The weighted average exercise price per share of the options exercised during the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $ 16.69 and $ 16.01 , respectively. The weighted average exercise price per share of the options exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $20.00 and $ 17.69 , respectively.


8



The computations for basic and dilutive earnings per share are as follows:
 
 
Three Month Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
September 30,
 
September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
Net income attributable to CONSOL Energy Inc. shareholders
$
167,329

 
$
75,383

 
$
436,862

 
$
242,320

Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
226,744,011

 
225,781,539

 
226,582,226

 
211,235,893

Effect of stock-based compensation awards
2,419,526

 
2,310,760

 
2,420,637

 
2,402,283

Dilutive
229,163,537

 
228,092,299

 
229,002,863

 
213,638,176

Earnings per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
$
0.74

 
$
0.33

 
$
1.93

 
$
1.15

Dilutive
$
0.73

 
$
0.33

 
$
1.91

 
$
1.13


NOTE 2—ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS:
    On September 30, 2011, CNX Gas Company (CNX Gas) completed a sale to Noble Energy, Inc. (Noble) of 50% of the Company's undivided interest in certain Marcellus Shale oil and gas properties in West Virginia and Pennsylvania covering approximately 628 thousand acres and 50% of the Company's undivided interest in certain of its existing Marcellus Shale wells and related leases. On September 30, 2011, cash proceeds of $ 519,188 were received from Noble. In addition to the cash proceeds, a one year note receivable due on September 30, 2012 in the amount of $ 311,754 and a two year note receivable due on September 30, 2013 in the amount of $ 296,343 have been recorded. These short and long-term notes receivable are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as Accounts and Notes Receivables—Other Receivables and Other Assets—Other, respectively. A loss of $ 64,429 on the transaction was recorded and is included in Other Income on the Consolidated Statements of Income. As part of the transaction, CONSOL Energy also received a commitment from Noble Energy to pay one-third of the Company's working interest share of certain drilling and completion costs, up to approximately $ 2,100,000 with certain restrictions.

The following unaudited pro forma combined financial statements are based on CONSOL Energy's historical consolidated financial statements and adjusted to give effect to the September 30, 2011 sale of a 50% interest in certain Marcellus Shale assets. The unaudited pro forma results for the periods presented below are prepared as if the transaction occurred as of January 1, 2010.
 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
September 30,
 
September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
Total Revenue and Other Income
$
1,502,660

 
$
1,341,784

 
$
4,531,696

 
$
3,862,000

Earnings Before Income Taxes
$
195,882

 
$
89,936

 
$
538,152

 
$
327,324

Net Income Attributable to CONSOL Energy Inc. Shareholders
$
163,822

 
$
74,458

 
$
427,491

 
$
240,683

Basic Earnings Per Share
$
0.72

 
$
0.33

 
$
1.89

 
$
1.14

Dilutive Earnings Per Share
$
0.71

 
$
0.33

 
$
1.87

 
$
1.12

The pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of what actually would have occurred if the transaction had been completed as of January 1, 2010, nor are they necessarily indicative of future consolidated results.

On September 30 2011, CNX Gas and Noble formed CONE Gathering LLC (CONE), a joint venture established to develop and operate each company's gas gathering system needs in the Marcellus Shale play. CNX Gas' 50% ownership interest in CONE is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. CNX Gas contributed its existing Marcellus Shale gathering infrastructure which had a net book value of $ 133,181 and Noble contributed cash of approximately $ 73,492 . On September 30, 2011, CONE made a cash distribution to CNX Gas in the amount of $ 73,492 . The cash proceeds have been recorded as cash inflows of $ 66,590 and $ 6,902 in Distributions from Equity Affiliates and Proceeds from the Sale of Assets, respectively, on the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. Additionally, a gain of $ 6,388 has been included in Other Income in the Consolidated Statements of Income.


9



On September 21, 2011 CONSOL Energy entered into an agreement with Antero Resources Appalachian Corp. (Antero), pursuant to which CONSOL Energy assigned to Antero overriding royalty interests (ORRI) of approximately 7% in 115,647 net acres of Marcellus Shale located in nine counties in southwestern Pennsylvania and north central West Virginia, in exchange for $ 193,000 . The net gain of $41,208 is included in Other Income in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
In September 2010, CONSOL Energy completed a sale-leaseback of longwall shields for Enlow Fork. Cash proceeds from the sale were $14,551 , which was the same as our basis in the equipment. Accordingly, no gain or loss was recognized on the transaction. The lease has been accounted for as an operating lease. The lease term is five years.
In June 2010, CONSOL Energy paid Yukon Pocahontas Coal Company $30,000 cash to acquire certain coal reserves and $20,000 cash in advanced royalty payments recoupable against future production. Both payments were made per a settlement agreement in regards to the depositing of untreated water from the Buchanan Mine, a mine operated by one of our subsidiaries, into the void spaces of the nearby mines of one of our other subsidiaries, Island Creek Coal Company.
On June 1, 2010, CONSOL Energy completed the acquisition of CNX Gas Corporation (CNX Gas) outstanding common stock for a cash payment of $966,811 pursuant to a tender offer followed by a short-form merger in which CNX Gas became a wholly owned subsidiary of CONSOL Energy (CNX Gas Acquisition). All of the shares of CNX Gas that were not already owned by CONSOL Energy were acquired at a price of $38.25 per share. CONSOL Energy previously owned approximately 83.3% of the approximately 151  million shares of CNX Gas common stock outstanding. An additional $24,223 cash payment was made to cancel previously vested but unexercised CNX Gas stock options. CONSOL Energy financed the acquisition of CNX Gas shares by means of internally generated funds, borrowings under its credit facilities and proceeds from its offering of common stock.
On April 30, 2010 , CONSOL Energy completed the acquisition of the Appalachian oil and gas exploration and production business of Dominion Resources, Inc. (Dominion Acquisition) for a cash payment as of September 30, 2010 of $3,474,199 which was principally allocated to oil & gas properties, wells and well-related equipment. The acquisition, which was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting, includes approximately 1 trillion cubic feet equivalents (Tcfe) of net proved reserves and 1.46 million net acres of oil and gas rights within the Appalachian Basin. Included in the acreage holdings are approximately 500   thousand prospective net Marcellus Shale acres located predominantly in southwestern Pennsylvania and northern West Virginia. Dominion is a producer and transporter of natural gas as well as a provider of electricity and related services. The acquisition enhanced CONSOL Energy’s position in the strategic Marcellus Shale fairway by increasing its development assets.
    
The unaudited pro forma results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 , assuming the acquisition had occurred at January 1, 2010, are presented below. Pro forma adjustments include estimated operating results, transaction and financing fees incurred, additional interest related to the $ 2.75 billion of senior unsecured notes and 44,275,000 shares of common stock issued in connection with the transaction.
 
 
Three Months
 
Nine Months
 
Ended
 
Ended
 
September 30,
 
September 30,
 
2010
 
2010
Total Revenue and Other Income
$
1,349,293

 
$
3,945,687

Earnings Before Income Taxes
$
91,140

 
$
275,748

Net Income Attributable to CONSOL Energy Inc. Shareholders
$
75,383

 
$
210,299

Basic Earnings Per Share
$
0.33

 
$
0.93

Dilutive Earnings Per Share
$
0.33

 
$
0.92


The pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of what actually would have occurred if the Dominion Acquisition had been completed as of January 1, 2010, nor are they necessarily indicative of future consolidated results.
CONSOL Energy incurred $337 and $64,415 of acquisition-related costs as a direct result of the Dominion Acquisition and CNX Gas Acquisition for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 , respectively. These expenses have been included within Transaction and Financing Fees on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the period ended September 30, 2010 .


10



In March 2010, CONSOL Energy completed the sale of the Jones Fork Mining Complex as part of a litigation settlement with Kentucky Fuel Corporation. No cash proceeds were received and $10,482 of litigation settlement expense was recorded in Cost of Goods Sold and Other Operating Charges. The loss recorded was net of $8,700 related to the fair value of estimated amounts to be collected related to an overriding royalty on future mineable and merchantable coal extracted and sold from the property.

NOTE 3—COMPONENTS OF PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS NET PERIODIC BENEFIT COSTS:
Components of net periodic costs for the three and nine months ended September 30 are as follows:
 
 
Pension Benefits
 
Other Postretirement Benefits
 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
September 30,
 
September 30,
 
September 30,
 
September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
Service cost
$
4,364

 
$
3,644

 
$
13,093

 
$
10,857

 
$
3,419

 
$
3,303

 
$
10,258

 
$
9,843

Interest cost
9,436

 
9,311

 
28,308

 
27,908

 
44,935

 
40,725

 
134,804

 
122,091

Expected return on plan assets
(9,631
)
 
(9,262
)
 
(28,892
)
 
(27,786
)
 

 

 

 

Amortization of prior service cost (credits)
(167
)
 
(184
)
 
(500
)
 
(551
)
 
(11,599
)
 
(11,604
)
 
(34,798
)
 
(34,811
)
Recognized net actuarial loss
9,526

 
7,968

 
28,577

 
23,903

 
26,341

 
17,537

 
79,023

 
52,609

Net periodic benefit cost
$
13,528

 
$
11,477

 
$
40,586

 
$
34,331

 
$
63,096

 
$
49,961

 
$
189,287

 
$
149,732


For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 , $ 57,713 in contributions were paid to the pension trust for pension benefits from operating cash flows. CONSOL Energy expects to contribute to the pension trust using prudent funding methods. Currently, depending on asset values and asset returns held in the trust, we expect to contribute $ 71,700 to the pension trust in 2011 .
CONSOL Energy does not expect to contribute to the other postemployment benefit plan in 2011 . We intend to pay benefit claims as they become due. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 , $123,185 of other postemployment benefits have been paid.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 , $ 7,781 of proceeds were received under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act related to reimbursements from the Federal government for retiree health spending. The proceeds were recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. There is no guarantee that additional proceeds will be received under this program.


11




NOTE 4—COMPONENTS OF COAL WORKERS’ PNEUMOCONIOSIS (CWP) AND WORKERS’ COMPENSATION NET PERIODIC BENEFIT COSTS:
Components of net periodic costs (benefits) for the three and nine months ended September 30 are as follows:
 
 
CWP
 
Workers’ Compensation
 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
September 30,
 
September 30,
 
September 30,
 
September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
Service cost
$
1,155

 
$
1,040

 
$
3,465

 
$
4,027

 
$
4,468

 
$
6,754

 
$
13,404

 
$
20,262

Interest cost
2,332

 
2,681

 
6,997

 
8,108

 
2,059

 
2,289

 
6,178

 
6,867

Amortization of actuarial gain
(5,477
)
 
(5,777
)
 
(16,432
)
 
(16,536
)
 
(977
)
 
(768
)
 
(2,930
)
 
(2,304
)
State administrative fees and insurance bond premiums

 

 

 

 
1,459

 
2,020

 
4,667

 
6,238

Legal and administrative costs
750

 
750

 
2,250

 
2,250

 
719

 
785

 
2,156

 
2,354

Net periodic (benefit) cost
$
(1,240
)
 
$
(1,306
)
 
$
(3,720
)
 
$
(2,151
)
 
$
7,728

 
$
11,080

 
$
23,475

 
$
33,417


CONSOL Energy does not expect to contribute to the CWP plan in 2011. We intend to pay benefit claims as they become due. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 , $ 8,833 of CWP benefit claims have been paid.
CONSOL Energy does not expect to contribute to the workers’ compensation plan in 2011. We intend to pay benefit claims as they become due. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 , $ 23,314 of workers’ compensation benefits, state administrative fees and surety bond premiums have been paid.

NOTE 5—INCOME TAXES:
The following is a reconciliation, stated in dollars and as a percentage of pretax income, of the U.S. statutory federal income tax rate to CONSOL Energy’s effective tax rate:
 
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Amount
 
Percent
 
Amount
 
Percent
Statutory U.S. federal income tax rate
$
192,599

 
35.0
 %
 
$
115,310

 
35.0
 %
Excess tax depletion
(76,561
)
 
(13.9
)
 
(49,852
)
 
(15.1
)
Effect of domestic production activities
(10,038
)
 
(1.8
)
 
(4,916
)
 
(1.5
)
Effect of federal tax accrual to tax return
(10,249
)
 
(1.9
)
 
3,163

 
1.0

IRS and state tax examination settlements
(5,187
)
 
(0.9
)
 

 

Net effect of state income taxes
16,088

 
2.9

 
9,220

 
2.8

Other
6,769

 
1.2

 
2,366

 
0.7

Income Tax Expense / Effective Rate
$
113,421

 
20.6
 %
 
$
75,291

 
22.9
 %

The effective rates for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were calculated using the annual effective rate projection on recurring earnings and include tax liabilities related to certain discrete transactions which are described below.

CONSOL Energy and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal, various state and Canadian tax jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2008. The Internal Revenue Service has issued its audit report relating to the examination of CONSOL Energy's 2006 and 2007 U.S. income tax returns during the three months ended September 30, 2011. As a result of these findings, CONSOL Energy paid federal and state income tax deficiencies of $ 10,765 and $ 1,523 , respectively. The federal and state income tax deficiencies paid were related of the IRS' examination of the Company's 2006 and 2007 tax returns and were the result of changes in the timing of certain tax deductions. The change in timing of certain tax deductions increased the tax benefit of percentage depletion by $ 2,594 and $ 908 in tax years 2006 and 2007, respectively. The


12



Company also realized a tax benefit of $ 981 on state income taxes related to the the federal percentage depletion increases.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, CONSOL Energy recognized certain tax benefits as a result of changes in estimates related to a prior-year tax provision. Due to the results of the IRS' audit of tax years 2006 and 2007 resulted in a tax position that increased the deduction for percentage depletion on the 2010 tax return compared to the 2010 tax accrual. The result of these changes was a tax reduction of $ 7,310 . Additionally, the Company concluded, based on subsequent-year developments, that claiming a Foreign Tax Credit was more tax efficient than deducting foreign income taxes paid. This change resulted in a $ 3,331 reduction in tax expense. The actualization of various other estimates resulted in a tax increase of $ 392 .

CONSOL Energy was advised by the Canadian Revenue Agency and various provinces that its appeal of tax deficiencies paid as a result of the Agency's audit of the Canadian tax returns filed for years 1997 through 2003 had been successfully resolved. As a result of the audit settlement, the Company reflected $3,424 as a discrete reduction to foreign income tax expense in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. As a result of the foreign income tax reduction, the Company reflected an additional $1,445 as discrete federal income tax expense. This discrete transaction was reflected in the Other line of the rate reconciliation in 2010.
As a result of the Dominion Acquisition, CONSOL Energy recognized a discrete state income tax expense of $ 1,782 due to the impact of the acquisition on existing deferred tax assets and liabilities in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Accordingly, a discrete reduction to federal income tax expense of $ 624 was also recognized related to this transaction. This discrete transaction was reflected in the Net effect of state income taxes line of the rate reconciliation in 2010.
CONSOL Energy was notified by the state of Ohio that the state had completed its audit of the Company's net operating loss (NOL) carryovers. In 2010, Ohio completed a transition from an income and franchise tax to a Commercial Activities Tax (CAT). The state's audit concluded that CONSOL Energy is entitled to a credit for unused NOLs against future CAT liabilities. These NOLs were previously fully reserved. In the nine months ended September 30, 2010, CONSOL Energy recognized a discrete reduction to state income tax expense of $ 2,068 related to the reversal of the previously recognized NOL allowance based on the audit settlement. This discrete transaction was reflected in the Net effect of state income taxes line of the rate reconciliation in 2010.
The total amounts of uncertain tax positions at September 30, 2011 and 2010 were $ 42,932 and $ 56,916 , respectively. If these uncertain tax positions were recognized, approximately $ 16,802 and $ 15,502 , respectively, would affect CONSOL Energy’s effective tax rate. There were no additions to the liability for unrecognized tax benefits during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. The reduction in unrecognized tax benefits in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, is a result of the completion of the Internal Revenue Service audit of the tax years 2006 and 2007 discussed above.
CONSOL Energy recognizes interest accrued related to uncertain tax positions in its interest expense. As of September 30, 2011 and 2010 , the Company reported an accrued interest liability relating to uncertain tax positions of $ 7,309 and $ 10,578 , respectively. The accrued interest liability includes $ 1,160 of interest income and $ 2,240 of interest expense that is reflected in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 , respectively. The reduction in accrued interest related to unrecognized tax benefits in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, was the result of the completion of the Internal Revenue Service audit. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, CONSOL Energy paid interest of $ 2,305 on federal income tax deficiencies previously recognized in interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits.
CONSOL Energy recognizes penalties accrued related to uncertain tax positions in its income tax expense. As of September 30, 2011 and 2010 , CONSOL Energy had no accrued liability for tax penalties.





13



NOTE 6—INVENTORIES:
Inventory components consist of the following:
 
 
September 30,
2011
 
December 31,
2010
Coal
$
90,914

 
$
108,694

Merchandise for resale
42,140

 
50,120

Supplies
108,637

 
99,724

Total Inventories
$
241,691

 
$
258,538


Merchandise for resale is valued using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) cost method. The excess of replacement cost of merchandise for resale inventories over carrying LIFO value was $ 24,094 and $ 19,624 at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 , respectively.

NOTE 7—ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE SECURITIZATION:
CONSOL Energy and certain of our U.S. subsidiaries are party to a trade accounts receivable facility with financial institutions for the sale on a continuous basis of eligible trade accounts receivable. The facility allows CONSOL Energy to receive on a revolving basis up to $200,000 . The facility also allows for the issuance of letters of credit against the $200,000 capacity. At September 30, 2011 , there were no letters of credit outstanding against the facility.
CNX Funding Corporation, a wholly owned, special purpose, bankruptcy-remote subsidiary, buys and sells eligible trade receivables generated by certain subsidiaries of CONSOL Energy. Under the receivables facility, CONSOL Energy and certain subsidiaries, irrevocably and without recourse, sell all of their eligible trade accounts receivable to CNX Funding Corporation, who in turn sells these receivables to financial institutions and their affiliates, while maintaining a subordinated interest in a portion of the pool of trade receivables. This retained interest, which is included in Accounts and Notes Receivable Trade in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, is recorded at fair value. Due to a short average collection cycle for such receivables, our collection experience history and the composition of the designated pool of trade accounts receivable that are part of this program, the fair value of our retained interest approximates the total amount of the designated pool of accounts receivable. CONSOL Energy will continue to service the sold trade receivables for the financial institutions for a fee based upon market rates for similar services.
The cost of funds under this facility is based upon commercial paper rates, plus a charge for administrative services paid to the financial institutions. Costs associated with the receivables facility totaled $ 386 and $ 1,683 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 , respectively. Costs associated with the receivables facility totaled $ 863 and $ 1,868 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. These costs have been recorded as financing fees which are included in Cost of Goods Sold and Other Operating Charges in the Consolidated Statements of Income. No servicing asset or liability has been recorded. The receivables facility expires in April 2012 .
At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 , eligible accounts receivable totaled $ 200,000 . There was subordinated retained interest of $200,000 at September 30, 2011 and there was no subordinated retained interest at December 31, 2010 . There was no borrowings under the Securitization Facility recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2011. At December 31, 2010 , $ 200,000 was recorded as Accounts Receivable – Securitization and Borrowings under the Securitization Facility on the Consolidated Balance Sheet based upon the borrowings outstanding at that date. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the respective $200,000 decrease and $ 150,000 increase in the accounts receivable securitization program were reflected in Net Cash (Used in) provided by Financing Activities in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. In accordance with the facility agreement, the Company is able to receive proceeds based upon the eligible accounts receivable at the previous month end.




14



NOTE 8—PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT:
 
 
September 30,
2011
 
December 31,
2010
Coal & other plant and equipment
$
5,094,572

 
$
5,100,085

Proven gas properties
1,507,682

 
1,662,605

Coal properties and surface lands
1,307,829

 
1,292,701

Unproven gas properties
1,280,354

 
2,206,399

Intangible drilling cost
1,234,529

 
1,116,884

Gas gathering equipment
925,668

 
941,772

Airshafts
660,324

 
662,315

Leased coal lands
540,051

 
536,603

Mine development
437,385

 
587,518

Coal advance mining royalties
395,362

 
389,379

Gas wells and related equipment
374,571

 
367,448

Other gas assets
74,981

 
84,571

Gas advance royalties
3,955

 
3,078

Total property, plant and equipment
13,837,263

 
14,951,358

Less Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization
4,766,163

 
4,822,107

Total Net Property, Plant and Equipment
$
9,071,100

 
$
10,129,251


Long-Lived Asset Abandonment
In June 2011, CONSOL Energy decided to permanently close its Mine 84 mining operation located near Washington, PA. This decision was part of CONSOL Energy's ongoing effort to reallocate resources into more profitable coal operations and Marcellus Shale drilling operations. The closure decision resulted in the recognition of an abandonment expense of $ 338 and $ 115,817 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. The abandonment expense resulted from the removal of the June 30, 2011 carrying value of the following Mine 84 related assets from the Consolidated Balance Sheets: Mine development - $ 92,136 , Airshafts - $ 15,352 , Coal equipment - $ 2,080 , Inventories - $ 757 , and Prepaid Expenses - $ 385 . Additionally, the Mine 84 abandonment expense also includes the recognition of a Mine Closing expense of $ 5,107 . The effect on net income of the Mine 84 abandonment was $ 220 and $ 75,281 of expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. There was no impact to basic and dilutive earnings per share for the three months ended September 30, 2011. The impact to basic and dilutive earnings per share was $ 0.33 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

NOTE 9—SHORT-TERM NOTES PAYABLE:
On April 12, 2011, CONSOL Energy amended and extended its $ 1,500,000 Senior Secured Credit Agreement through April 12, 2016. The previous facility was set to expire on May 7, 2014. The amendment provides more favorable pricing and the facility continues to be secured by substantially all of the assets of CONSOL Energy and certain of its subsidiaries. CONSOL Energy's credit facility allows for up to $1,500,000 of borrowings and letters of credit. CONSOL Energy can request an additional $ 250,000 increase in the aggregate borrowing limit amount. Fees and interest rate spreads are based on a ratio of financial covenant debt to twelve-month trailing earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization (EBITDA), measured quarterly. The facility includes a minimum interest coverage ratio covenant of no less than 2.50 to 1.00, measured quarterly. The interest coverage ratio was 5.56 to 1.00 at September 30, 2011 . The facility includes a maximum leverage ratio covenant of not more than 4.75 to 1.00, measured quarterly. The leverage ratio was 2.17 to 1.00 at September 30, 2011 . The facility also includes a senior secured leverage ratio covenant of not more than 2.00 to 1.00, measured quarterly. The senior secured leverage ratio was 0.19 to 1.00 at September 30, 2011 . Affirmative and negative covenants in the facility limit our ability to dispose of assets, make investments, purchase or redeem CONSOL Energy common stock, pay dividends, merge with another corporation and amend, modify or restate the senior unsecured notes. At September 30, 2011 , the $1,500,000 facility had no borrowings outstanding and $ 265,173 of letters of credit outstanding, leaving $ 1,234,827 of capacity available for borrowings and the issuance of letters of credit. The average interest rate for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011 was 4.15% and 4.07% , respectively. Accrued interest of $ 44 and $ 249 is included in Other Accrued Liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 , respectively.



15



On April 12, 2011, CNX Gas entered into a $ 1,000,000 Senior Secured Credit Agreement which extends until April 12, 2016. It replaced the $ 700,000 Senior Secured Credit Facility which was set to expire on May 6, 2014. The replacement facility provides more favorable pricing and the facility continues to be secured by substantially all of the assets of CNX Gas and its subsidiaries. CNX Gas' credit facility allows for up to $1,000,000 for borrowings and letters of credit. CNX Gas can request an additional $ 250,000 increase in the aggregate borrowing limit amount. The facility was increased to meet the asset development needs of the company. Fees and interest rate spreads are based on the percentage of facility utilization, measured quarterly. Covenants in the facility limit CNX Gas’ ability to dispose of assets, make investments, pay dividends and merge with another corporation. The facility includes a maximum leverage ratio covenant of not more than 3.50 to 1.00, measured quarterly. The leverage ratio was 0.00 to 1.00 at September 30, 2011 . The facility also includes a minimum interest coverage ratio covenant of no less than 3.00 to 1.00, measured quarterly. This ratio was 35.60 to 1.00 at September 30, 2011 . At September 30, 2011 , the $ 1,000,000 facility had no borrowings outstanding and $ 70,203 of letters of credit outstanding, leaving $ 929,797 of capacity available for borrowings and the issuance of letters of credit. The average interest rate for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011 was 1.89% and 2.08% , respectively. Accrued interest of $ 112 and $ 98 is included in Other Accrued Liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 , respectively.

NOTE 10—LONG-TERM DEBT:
 
 
September 30,
2011
 
December 31,
2010
Debt:
 
 
 
Senior notes due April 2017 at 8.00%, issued at par value
$
1,500,000

 
$
1,500,000

Senior notes due April 2020 at 8.25%, issued at par value
1,250,000

 
1,250,000

Senior notes due March 2021 at 6.375%, issued at par value
250,000

 

Senior secured notes due March 2012 at 7.875% (par value of $250,000 less unamortized discount of $242 at December 31, 2010)

 
249,758

Baltimore Port Facility revenue bonds in series due September 2025 at 5.75%
102,865

 
102,865

Advance royalty commitments (7.56% weighted average interest rate for September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010)
32,211

 
32,211

Note Due December 2012 at 4.28%

 
10,438

Other long-term notes maturing at various dates through 2031
76

 
93

 
3,135,152

 
3,145,365

Less amounts due in one year
11,718

 
16,629

Long-Term Debt
$
3,123,434

 
$
3,128,736


On March 9, 2011 CONSOL Energy closed the offering of $250,000 of 6.375% senior notes which mature on March 1, 2021 . The notes are guaranteed by substantially all of our existing wholly owned domestic subsidiaries.
On April 11, 2011 , CONSOL Energy redeemed all of its outstanding $ 250,000 , 7.875% senior secured notes due March 1, 2012 in accordance with the terms of the indenture governing these notes. The redemption price included principal of $ 250,000 , a make-whole premium of $ 15,785 and accrued interest of $ 2,188 for a total redemption cost of $ 267,973 . The loss on extinguishment of debt was $ 16,090 , which primarily represents the interest that would have been paid on these notes if held to maturity.
In August 2011, CONSOL Energy paid the remaining principal balance on the 4.28% Notes due December 2012. The early debt retirement was completed as a condition of a drilling services contract termination.
Transaction and financing fees of $14,907 were incurred in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 related to the solicitation of consents from the holders of CONSOL Energy's outstanding 8.00% Senior Notes due 2017, 8.25% Senior Notes due 2020 and 6.375% Senior Notes due 2021. The consents allowed an amendment of the indentures for each of those notes, clarifying that the transactions contemplated by the August 2011 Asset Acquisition Agreements with Noble Energy and Hess Ohio Developments, LLC were permissible under those indentures. See Note 2—Acquisitions and Dispositions and Note 18—Subsequent Events for additional information.
Accrued interest related to Long-Term Debt of $ 113,575 and $ 64,009 was included in Other Accrued Liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 , respectively.


16




NOTE 11—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:
CONSOL Energy and its subsidiaries are subject to various lawsuits and claims with respect to such matters as personal injury, wrongful death, damage to property, exposure to hazardous substances, governmental regulations including environmental remediation, employment and contract disputes and other claims and actions arising out of the normal course of business. We accrue the estimated loss for these lawsuits and claims when the loss is probable and can be estimated. Our current estimated accruals related to these pending claims, individually and in the aggregate, are immaterial to the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of CONSOL Energy. It is possible that the aggregate loss in the future with respect to these lawsuits and claims could ultimately be material to the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of CONSOL Energy; however, such amount cannot be reasonably estimated. The amount claimed against CONSOL Energy is disclosed below when an amount is expressly stated in the lawsuit or claim, which is not often the case. The maximum aggregate amount claimed in those lawsuits and claims, regardless of probability, where a claim is expressly stated or can be estimated exceeds the aggregate amounts accrued for all lawsuits and claims by approximately $ 230,000 .
The following lawsuits and claims include those for which a loss is probable and an accrual has been recognized.

American Electric Corp: On August 8, 2011, the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV, sent Consolidation Coal Company a General Notice and Offer to Negotiate regarding the Ellis Road/American Electric Corp. Superfund Site in Jacksonville, Florida. The General Notice was sent to approximately 180 former customers of American Electric Corp. CONSOL Energy has confirmed that it did business with American Electric Corp. in 1983‑84. The General Notice indicates that the EPA has determined that PCBs and other contaminants in the soils and sediments at and near the site require a removal action to address those areas. The Offer to Negotiate invites the potentially responsible parties (PRPs) to enter into an Administrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent to provide for conducting the removal action under the EPA oversight and to reimburse the EPA for its past costs, in the amount of $ 384 and for its future costs. CONSOL Energy has responded to the EPA indicating its willingness to participate in such negotiations, and CONSOL Energy is participating in the formation of a group of potentially responsible parties to consider conducting the removal action. The actual scope of the work has yet to be determined, and, therefore, CONSOL Energy is not able currently to estimate the total costs of the removal action or CONSOL Energy's likely share of such costs. However, given the available site background information and our experience in similar litigation, CONSOL Energy has estimated a range of potential liability and has established an initial accrual at the low end of the range. The liability is immaterial and is included in Other Accrued Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Ward Transformer Superfund Site: CONSOL Energy was notified in November 2004 by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that it is a potentially responsible party (PRP) under the Superfund program established by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (CERCLA), with respect to the Ward Transformer site in Wake County, North Carolina. At that time, the EPA also identified 38 other PRPs for the Ward Transformer site. The EPA, CONSOL Energy and two other PRPs entered into an administrative Settlement Agreement and Order of Consent, requiring those PRPs to undertake and complete a PCB soil removal action, at and in the vicinity of the Ward Transformer property. Another party joined the participating PRPs and reduced CONSOL Energy's interim allocation share from 46% to 32% . In June 2008, while conducting the PCB soil excavation on the Ward property, it was determined that PCBs have migrated onto adjacent properties. The current estimated cost of remedial action for the area CONSOL Energy was originally named a PRP, including payment of the EPA's past and future cost, is approximately $ 65,000 . The current estimated cost of the most likely remediation plan for the additional areas discovered is approximately $ 11,000 . Also, in September 2008, the EPA notified CONSOL Energy and sixty other PRPs that there were additional areas of potential contamination allegedly related to the Ward Transformer Site. Current estimates of the cost or potential range of cost for this area are not yet available. There was no expense recognized in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 related to this matter. There was $ 2,880 of expense recognized in Cost of Goods Sold and Other Operating Charges in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 related to this matter. CONSOL Energy funded $ 250 in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to an independent trust established for this remediation. CONSOL Energy funded $ 1,209 in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to the trust. As of September 30, 2011, CONSOL Energy and the other participating PRPs had asserted CERCLA cost recovery and contribution claims against approximately 225 nonparticipating PRPs to recover a share of the costs incurred and to be incurred to conduct the removal actions at the Ward Site. CONSOL Energy's portion of recoveries from settled claims is $ 4,432 . Accordingly, the liability reflected in Other Accrued Liabilities was reduced by these settled claims. The remaining net liability at September 30, 2011 is $ 3,528 .

Asbestos-Related Litigation: One of our subsidiaries, Fairmont Supply Company (Fairmont), which distributes industrial supplies, currently is named as a defendant in approximately 7,500 asbestos-related claims in state courts in Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia, Maryland, New Jersey, Texas and Illinois. This number has been reduced from the 22,500 pending claims


17



that were previously reported after a review of the dockets where these cases are pending found that approximately 15,000 cases had been dismissed by administrative order, without the payment of any damages or settlement amounts. Because a very small percentage of products manufactured by third parties and supplied by Fairmont in the past may have contained asbestos and many of the pending claims are part of mass complaints filed by hundreds of plaintiffs against a hundred or more defendants, it has been difficult for Fairmont to determine how many of the cases actually involve valid claims or plaintiffs who were actually exposed to asbestos-containing products supplied by Fairmont. In addition, while Fairmont may be entitled to indemnity or contribution in certain jurisdictions from manufacturers of identified products, the availability of such indemnity or contribution is unclear at this time, and in recent years, some of the manufacturers named as defendants in these actions have sought protection from these claims under bankruptcy laws. Fairmont has no insurance coverage with respect to these asbestos cases. Based on over 15 years of experience with this litigation, we have established an accrual to cover our estimated liability for these cases. This accrual is immaterial and is included in Other Accrued Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Past payments by Fairmont with respect to asbestos cases have not been material; however, the aggregate amount claimed is not known at this time and the potential loss cannot be reasonably estimated because of the nature of the mass complaints, discovery is typically not permitted until shortly before the trial, and information regarding the identity and number of defendants for individual claims is not available until shortly before trial.
Severance Tax Litigation: In December 2010, Tazewell County, Virginia asserted a claim for the tax year 2007, although the County has not filed a lawsuit against CNX Gas Company LLC. The complaint alleged that CNX Gas' calculation of the license tax on the basis of the wellhead value (sales price less post production costs) rather than the sales price is improper. We continued to pay Tazewell County taxes based on our method of calculating the taxes. CONSOL Energy is evaluating the merits of that claim. The difference between the amount of tax that Tazewell County is claiming using its methodology for calculating the tax and the amount of tax as paid by CNX Gas Company is approximately $ 1,970 for January 1, 2007 through September 30, 2011. The related accrual is included in Other Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Northern Appalachia Water Issues: In the Fall of 2009, a fish kill occurred in Dunkard Creek, which is a creek with segments in both Pennsylvania and West Virginia. The fish kill was caused by the growth of golden algae in the creek, which appears to be an invasive species. Our subsidiary, CCC, discharges treated mine water into Dunkard Creek from its Blacksville No. 2 Mine and from its Loveridge Mine. The discharges have levels of chlorides that cause Dunkard Creek to exceed West Virginia in-stream water quality standards. Prior to the fish kill and continuing thereafter, CCC was subject to an Agreed Order with the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (WVDEP) that set forth a schedule for compliance with these in-stream chloride limits. On December 18, 2009, the WVDEP issued a Unilateral Order that imposed additional conditions on CCC's discharges into Dunkard Creek and required CCC to develop a plan for long-term treatment of those and other high-chloride discharges. Pursuant to the Unilateral Order as well as a subsequent Unilateral Order issued by the WVDEP, CCC submitted a plan and schedule to WVDEP which provides for construction of a centralized advanced technology mine water treatment plant by May 31, 2013 to achieve compliance with chloride effluent limits and in-stream chloride water quality standards. The cost of the treatment plant and related facilities may reach or exceed $200,000 . CCC negotiated a joint Consent Decree with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the WVDEP that includes a compliance plan and schedule. The Consent Decree, which was finalized in the three months ended December 31, 2010, included a civil penalty of $5,500 , which was accrued at that time, to settle alleged past violations related to chlorides, without any admission of liability. CCC also negotiated a settlement with the WVDEP and the West Virginia Department of Natural Resources settling state claims for natural resource damages for $500 (which was accrued in the three months ended March 31, 2011), without any admission of liability. The civil penalty and the natural resource damage claim were paid in the nine months ended September 30, 2011. No additional penalties or damage claim remain related to this matter at September 30, 2011.
Decker/Gillingham Litigation: Two contractor employees-Messrs. Decker and Gillingham-were injured when a stairway affixed to the exterior of a building collapsed at CONSOL Energy's Research and Development facility in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania in 2007. Mr. Decker sustained a broken hip and leg. Mr. Gillingham sustained a torn rotator cuff. Both men have recovered and are working, although both claim that the accident has limited their ability to perform their jobs. Messrs. Decker and Gillingham sued CONSOL Energy on June 4, 2008 and June 20, 2008, respectively, in Allegheny County Common Pleas Court, alleging, among other things, that CONSOL Energy was negligent in the maintenance of the stairway. The cases were consolidated. In late November, 2010, after a jury trial, the jury found that CONSOL Energy was negligent in maintaining the stairway and the jury awarded Mr. Decker and his spouse $ 5,000 and Mr. Gillingham and his spouse $ 2,800 . These amounts included compensatory damages, as well as damages for pain and suffering, embarrassment and humiliation, and loss of ability to enjoy the pleasures of life. We have appealed the verdict. We have accrued $ 7,800 which was included in Other Accrued Liabilities for this claim. CONSOL Energy maintains insurance for damages in excess of $ 5,000 and has recognized a receivable of $ 2,826 in Other Receivables on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Royalty Owners Group Litigation: These five separate but related cases, filed on February 13, 2006 in the Circuit Court of Buchanan County, Virginia, involve claims by several of CNX Gas's lessors in southwest Virginia that certain improper deductions have been made on their royalty payments by CNX Gas with respect to the period from 1999 to the present. The


18



deductions at issue primarily relate to post production expenses of gathering, compression and transportation. Specifically, the plaintiffs allege that (i) CNX Gas' gathering system in its Virginia field is over built, (ii) CNX Gas is not entitled to deductions for certain compression costs, because that is a production activity, not a post-production activity, and (iii) CNX Gas is not entitled to a deduction for firm transportation expense, because that is a marketing activity, not a post-production cost. The litigation has settled in the three months ended September 30, 2011, with the Company paying the lessors $ 1,000 , which was previously accrued, and the Company will take a fixed deduction from royalties going forward.
The following lawsuits and claims include those for which a loss is possible, but not probable, and accordingly no accrual has been recognized.
Ryerson Dam Litigation: In 2008, the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (the Commonwealth) filed a six-count Complaint in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, claiming that the Company's underground longwall mining activities at its Bailey Mine caused cracks and seepage damage to the Ryerson Park Dam. The Commonwealth subsequently altered the dam, thereby eliminating the Ryerson Park Lake. The Commonwealth claimed that the Company is liable for dam reconstruction costs, lake restoration costs and natural resource damages totaling $58,000. The Court stayed the proceedings in the state court, holding that the Commonwealth should pursue administrative agency review of the claim. Furthermore, the Court found that the Commonwealth could not recover natural resource damages under applicable law. The Commonwealth then filed a subsidence-damage claim with the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and the DEP reviewed the issue of whether the dam was damaged by subsidence. On February 16, 2010, the DEP issued its interim report, concluding that the alleged damage was subsidence related. In the next phase of the DEP proceeding, which was the damage phase, the DEP determined that the Company must repair the dam. The DEP estimated the cost of repair to be approximately $ 20,000 . The Company has appealed the DEP's findings to the Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board (PEHB), which will consider the case de novo, meaning without regard to the DEP's decision, as to any finding of causation of damage and/or the amount of damages. In order to perfect its appeal to the PEHB under the applicable statute, the Company deposited $ 20,291 into escrow as security for the DEP's estimated cost of repair. This amount is reflected as restricted cash on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The Company is seeking to substitute an appeal bond for the cash deposit. Either party may appeal the decision of the PEHB to the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court, and then, as may be allowed, to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. On March 31, 2011, the DEP informed the parties that it was withdrawing its Order requiring the Company to repair the dam because of additional movements of the dam site, well after mining had ceased; therefore, that movement would preclude repair of the dam as a remedy. On May 18, 2011, the DEP attempted to reinstate its order requiring repair of the dam. The Company filed a motion to vacate that order, arguing that the DEP cannot reinstate an order which was withdrawn in the manner in which the DEP attempted to do so. The PEHB ruled that DEP could reinstate its November 3, 2010 order and issued a scheduling order. The discovery period runs until October 16, 2012, with summary judgment motions due in January 2013. A hearing on the merits will not occur until sometime in the spring or summer of 2013. As to the underlying claim, the Company believes it is not responsible for the damage to the dam and that numerous grounds exist upon which to attack the propriety of the claims. For that reason, we have not accrued a liability for this claim; however, if the Company is ultimately found to be liable for damages to the dam, we believe the range of loss would be between $ 9,000 and $ 30,000 .

South Carolina Gas & Electric Company Arbitration: South Carolina Electric & Gas Company (SCE&G), a utility, has demanded arbitration, seeking $36,000 in damages against CONSOL of Kentucky and CONSOL Energy Sales Company. SCE&G claims it suffered damages in obtaining cover coal to replace coal which was not delivered in 2008 under a coal sales agreement.   The Company counterclaimed against SCE&G for $9,400 for terminating coal shipments under the sales agreement which SCE&G had agreed could be made up in 2009.  A hearing on the claims is scheduled for October 2011. The named CONSOL Energy defendants deny all liability and intend to vigorously defend the action filed against them. For that reason, we have not accrued a liability for this claim. If the named CONSOL Energy defendants prevail, the range of recovery would be between $ 5,100 and $ 6,800 . If liability is ultimately imposed on the named CONSOL Energy defendants, we believe the range of loss would be between $ 16,000 and $ 27,000 .
CNX Gas Shareholders Litigation: CONSOL Energy has been named as a defendant in five putative class actions brought by alleged shareholders of CNX Gas challenging the tender offer by CONSOL Energy to acquire all of the shares of CNX Gas common stock that CONSOL Energy did not already own for $38.25 per share. The two cases filed in Pennsylvania Common Pleas Court have been stayed and the three cases filed in the Delaware Chancery Court have been consolidated under the caption In Re CNX Gas Shareholders Litigation (C.A. No. 5377-VCL). With one exception, these cases also name CNX Gas and certain officers and directors of CONSOL Energy and CNX Gas as defendants.  All five actions generally allege that CONSOL Energy breached and/or aided and abetted in the breach of fiduciary duties purportedly owed to CNX Gas public shareholders, essentially alleging that the $38.25 per share price that CONSOL Energy paid to CNX Gas shareholders in the tender offer and subsequent short-form merger was unfair. Among other things, the actions sought a permanent injunction against or rescission of the tender offer, damages, and attorneys' fees and expenses.  The Delaware Court of Chancery denied an


19



injunction against the tender offer and CONSOL Energy completed the acquisition of the outstanding shares of CNX Gas on June 1, 2010. The Delaware Court of Chancery certified to the Delaware Supreme Court the question of what legal standard should be applied to the tender offer, which would effectively determine whether the shareholders can proceed with a damage claim. The Delaware Supreme Court declined to accept the appeal pending a final judgment. Therefore, the lawsuit will likely go to trial, possibly later in 2011. There may be mediation prior to any trial. CONSOL Energy believes that these actions are without merit and intends to defend them vigorously. For that reason, we have not accrued a liability for this claim; however, if liability is ultimately imposed, based on the expert reports that have been exchanged by the parties, we believe the range of loss would be up to $ 221,000 .

Rasnake Litigation: On August 28, 2006, plaintiffs filed a complaint in Russell County Circuit Court of Lebanon, Virginia, involving the CBM located on four separate tracts of land located in Russell and Buchanan Counties, Virginia (the “Subject Property”). Plaintiffs allege that CNX Gas is trespassing upon the Subject Property by producing CBM therefrom without authorization. Plaintiffs also allege that CNX Gas has committed slander on plaintiffs' title by failing to properly recognize their ownership interest in the Subject Property when submitting pooling applications to the Virginia Gas and Oil Board. The plaintiffs seek trespass damages in an amount equal to the total revenue from the wells. We believe that their trespass claim is without merit because we produced the gas pursuant to a force pooling order from the Virginia Gas and Oil Board and we believe total revenue is not the proper remedy for trespass damages. CONSOL Energy believes that the case is without merit and intends to defend it vigorously. For that reason, we have not accrued a liability for this claim, however, if liability is ultimately imposed, we believe the range of loss would be between $ 500 and $ 2,000 .

The following royalty and land right lawsuits and claims include those for which a loss is possible, but not probable, and accordingly, no accrual has been recognized. These claims are influenced by many factors which prevent the estimation of a range of potential loss. These factors include, but are not limited to, generalized allegations of unspecified damages (such as improper deductions), discovery having not commenced or not having been completed, unavailability of expert reports on damages and non-monetary issues are being tried. For example, in instances where a gas lease termination is sought, damages would depend on speculation as to if and when the gas production would otherwise have occurred, how many wells would have been drilled on the lease premises, what their production would be, what the cost of production would be, and what the price of gas would be during the production period. An estimate is calculated, if applicable, when sufficient information becomes available.

C. L. Ritter: On March 1, 2011, the Company was served with a complaint instituted by C. L. Ritter Lumber Company Incorporated against Consolidation Coal Company (CCC), Island Creek Coal Company, (ICCC), CNX Gas Company LLC, subsidiaries of CONSOL Energy Inc., as well as CONSOL Energy itself in the Circuit Court of Buchanan County, Virginia, seeking damages and injunctive relief in connection with the deposit of untreated water from mining activities at CCC's Buchanan Mine into nearby void spaces at one of the mines of ICCC. The suit alleges damages of up to $ 300,000 for alleged damage to coal and coalbed methane, as well as breach of contract damages. We have removed the case to federal court and filed a motion to dismiss, largely predicated on the statute of limitations bar. The Magistrate Judge recommended denying the motion to dismiss largely based on the plaintiff's failure to plead when the water depositing was discovered and because the plaintiff was claiming under CERCLA. We filed objections to those Recommendations. The trial judge ruled that the issue of the applicability of the statute of limitations bar can only be addressed after discovery. Three similar lawsuits were filed recently in the same court by other plaintiffs; the Company intends to file motions to dismiss those suits as well. CCC believes that it had, and continues to have, the right to store water in these void areas. CCC and the other named CONSOL Energy defendants deny all liability and intend to vigorously defend the action filed against them in connection with the removal and deposit of water from the Buchanan Mine. Consequently, we have not recognized any liability related to these actions.

Hale Litigation: A purported class action lawsuit was filed on September 23, 2010 in U.S. District Court in Abingdon, Virginia styled Hale v. CNX Gas Company LLC et. al. The lawsuit alleges that the plaintiff class consists of oil and gas owners, that the Virginia Supreme Court has decided that coalbed methane (CBM) belongs to the owner of the oil and gas estate, that the Virginia Gas and Oil Act of 1990 unconstitutionally allows force pooling of CBM, that the Act unconstitutionally provides only a 1/8 royalty to CBM owners for gas produced under the force pooling orders, and that the Company only relied upon control of the coal estate in force pooling the CBM notwithstanding the Virginia Supreme Court decision holding that if only the coal estate is controlled, the CBM is not thereby controlled. The lawsuit seeks a judicial declaration of ownership of the CBM and that the entire net proceeds of CBM production (that is, the 1/8 royalty and the 7/8 of net revenues since production began) be distributed to the class members. The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation in which she recommended that the District Judge decide that the deemed lease provision of the Gas and Oil Act is constitutional as is the 1/8 royalty, and that CNX Gas need not distribute the net proceeds to class members. The Magistrate Judge recommended against the dismissal of certain other claims, none of which are believed to have any significance. Both parties objected to the portions of the Recommendations which adversely affected their interests. The District Judge affirmed the Magistrate Judge's Recommendations in their entirety. The plaintiffs and CNX Gas have agreed to


20



stay this litigation. CONSOL Energy believes that the case is without merit and intends to defend it vigorously. Consequently, we have not recognized any liability related to these actions.

Addison Litigation: A purported class action lawsuit was filed on April 28, 2010 in Federal court in Virginia styled Addison v. CNX Gas Company LLC. The case involves two primary claims: (i) the plaintiff and similarly situated CNX Gas lessors identified as conflicting claimants during the force pooling process before the Virginia Gas and Oil Board are the owners of the CBM and, accordingly, the owners of the escrowed royalty payments being held by the Commonwealth of Virginia; and (ii) CNX Gas failed to either pay royalties due these conflicting claimant lessors or paid them less than required because of the alleged practice of improper below market sales and/or taking alleged improper post-production deductions. Plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment regarding ownership and compensatory and punitive damages for breach of contract; conversion; negligence (voluntary undertaking), for force pooling coal owners after the Ratliff decision declared coal owners did not own the CBM; negligent breach of duties as an operator; breach of fiduciary duties; and unjust enrichment. We filed a Motion to Dismiss in this case, and the Magistrate Judge recommended dismissing some claims and allowing others to proceed. Both parties objected to the portions of the Recommendations which adversely affected their interests. Oral argument on the objections occurred on August 2, 2011 before the District Judge, who affirmed the Magistrate Judge's Recommendations in their entirety. The plaintiffs and CNX Gas have agreed to stay this litigation. CONSOL Energy believes that the case is without merit and intends to defend it vigorously. Consequently, we have not recognized any liability related to these actions.

Hall Litigation: A purported class action lawsuit was filed on December 23, 2010 styled Hall v. CONSOL Gas Company in Allegheny County Pennsylvania Common Pleas Court.  The named plaintiff is Earl D. Hall.  The purported class plaintiffs are all Pennsylvania oil and gas lessors to Dominion Exploration and Production Company, whose leases were acquired by CONSOL Energy.  The complaint alleges more than 1,000 similarly situated lessors.  The lawsuit alleges that CONSOL Energy incorrectly calculated royalties by (i) calculating line loss on the basis of allocated volumes rather than on a well-by-well basis, (ii) possibly calculating the royalty on the basis of an incorrect price, (iii) possibly taking unreasonable deductions for post-production costs and costs that were not arms-length, (iv) not paying royalties on gas lost or used before the point of sale, and (v) not paying royalties on oil production. The complaint also alleges that royalty statements were false and misleading.  The complaint seeks damages, interest and an accounting on a well-by-well basis. The plaintiff amended the complaint and we have filed preliminary objections. In response to our preliminary objections, the Court dismissed the plaintiffs' claims for underpayment of royalties on gas lost or used before the point of sale and allowed the plaintiffs to amend their complaint to specifically state their claim on oil production. CONSOL Energy believes that the case is without merit and intends to defend it vigorously. Consequently, we have not recognized any liability related to these actions.

Kennedy Litigation: The Company is a party to a case filed on March 26, 2008 captioned Earl Kennedy (and others) v. CNX Gas and CONSOL Energy in the Court of Common Pleas of Greene County, Pennsylvania. The lawsuit alleges that CNX Gas and CONSOL Energy trespassed and converted gas and other minerals allegedly belonging to the plaintiffs in connection with wells drilled by CNX Gas. The complaint, as amended, seeks injunctive relief, including removing CNX Gas from the property, and compensatory damages of $20,000. The suit also sought to overturn existing law as to the ownership of coalbed methane in Pennsylvania, but that claim was dismissed by the court; the plaintiffs are seeking to appeal that dismissal. The suit also seeks a determination that the Pittsburgh 8 coal seam does not include the “roof/rider” coal. The court denied the plaintiff's summary judgment motion on that issue. The court will hold a bench trial on the “roof/rider” coal issue in November 2011. CNX Gas and CONSOL Energy believe this lawsuit to be without merit and intend to vigorously defend it. Consequently, we have not recognized any liability related to these actions.

Rowland Litigation: Rowland Land Company filed a complaint in May 2011 against CONSOL Energy, CNX Gas, Dominion Resources, and EQT Production Company (EQT) in Raleigh County Circuit Court, West Virginia. Rowland is the lessor on a 33,000 acre oil and gas lease in southern West Virginia. EQT was the original lessee, but they farmed out the development of the lease to Dominion, in exchange for an overriding royalty. Dominion sold the indirect subsidiary that held the lease to a subsidiary of CONSOL Energy on April 30, 2010. Subsequent to that acquisition, the subsidiary that held the lease was merged into CNX Gas as part of an internal reorganization. Rowland alleges that (i) Dominion's sale of the subsidiary to CONSOL Energy was a change in control that required its consent under the terms of the farmout agreement and lease, and (ii) the subsequent merger of the subsidiary into CNX Gas was an assignment that required its consent under the lease. Rowland alleges that the failure to obtain the required consent constitutes a breach of the lease and it seeks damages and a forfeiture of the lease. CONSOL Energy and CNX Gas have filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, arguing among other things, that Dominion's sale of the indirect subsidiary was not a change in control; that even if the sale constituted a change in control, the purchase agreement between Dominion and CONSOL Energy did not give effect to the transfer so the transfer never occurred; that the mergers did not require consent; and that Rowland did not provide timely notice of breach of the lease in accordance with its terms. Rowland is amending its complaint to include allegations that CONSOL Energy and Dominion Resources are liable for their subsidiaries' actions. We will file a motion to dismiss in response. CONSOL Energy believes that the case is without merit and intends to defend it vigorously. Consequently, we have not recognized any liability related to


21



these actions.

Majorsville Storage Field Declaratory Judgment: On March 3, 2011, an attorney sent a letter to CNX Gas regarding certain leases that CNX Gas obtained from Columbia Gas in Greene County, Pennsylvania involving the Majorsville Storage Field. The letter was written on behalf of three lessors alleging that the leases totaling 525 acres are invalid, and had expired by their terms. The plaintiffs' theory is that the rights of storage and production are severable under the leases. Ignoring the fact that the leases have been used for gas storage, they claim that since there has been no production or development of production, the right to produce gas expired at the end of the primary terms. On June 16, 2011 in the Court of Common Pleas of Greene County, Pennsylvania, the Company filed a declaratory judgment action, seeking to have a court confirm the validity of the leases. We believe that we will prevail in this litigation based on the language of the leases and the current status of the law. Consequently, we have not recognized any liability related to these actions.

The following lawsuit and claims include those for which a loss is remote and accordingly, no accrual has been recognized, although if a non favorable verdict were received the impact could be material

Comer Litigation: In 2005, plaintiffs Ned Comer and others filed a purported class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi against a number of companies in energy, fossil fuels and chemical industries, including CONSOL Energy styled, Comer, et al. v. Murphy Oil, et al. The plaintiffs, residents and owners of property along the Mississippi Gulf coast, alleged that the defendants caused the emission of greenhouse gases that contributed to global warming, which in turn caused a rise in sea levels and added to the ferocity of Hurricane Katrina, which combined to destroy the plaintiffs' property. The District Court dismissed the case and the plaintiffs appealed. The Circuit Court panel reversed and the defendants sought a rehearing before the entire court. A rehearing before the entire court was granted, which had the effect of vacating the panel's reversal, but before the case could be heard on the merits, a number of judges recused themselves and there was no longer a quorum. As a result, the District Court's dismissal was effectively reinstated. The plaintiffs asked the U.S. Supreme Court to require the Circuit Court to address the merits of their appeal. On January 11, 2011, the Supreme Court denied that request. Although that should have resulted in the dismissal being a finality, the plaintiffs filed a lawsuit on May 27, 2011, in the same jurisdiction against essentially the same defendants making nearly identical allegations as in the original lawsuit. The defendants intend to seek an early dismissal of the case.






 





         


22



At September 30, 2011 , CONSOL Energy has provided the following financial guarantees, unconditional purchase obligations and letters of credit to certain third parties, as described by major category in the following table. These amounts represent the maximum potential total of future payments that we could be required to make under these instruments. These amounts have not been reduced for potential recoveries under recourse or collateralization provisions. Generally, recoveries under reclamation bonds would be limited to the extent of the work performed at the time of the default. No amounts related to these financial guarantees and letters of credit are recorded as liabilities on the financial statements. CONSOL Energy management believes that these guarantees will expire without being funded, and therefore the commitments will not have a material adverse effect on financial condition.
 
 
Amount of Commitment
Expiration Per Period
 
Total
Amounts
Committed
 
Less Than
1  Year
 
1-3 Years
 
3-5 Years
 
Beyond
5  Years
Letters of Credit:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Employee-Related
$
197,947

 
$
90,573

 
$
107,374

 
$

 
$

Environmental
56,994

 
55,266

 
1,728

 

 

Gas
70,213

 
14,913

 
55,300

 

 

Other
10,305

 
164

 
10,141

 

 

Total Letters of Credit
335,459

 
160,916

 
174,543

 

 

Surety Bonds:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Employee-Related
204,895

 
204,895

 

 

 

Environmental
434,621

 
434,251

 
370

 

 

Gas
9,872

 
9,806

 
65

 

 
1

Other
17,456

 
17,456

 

 

 

Total Surety Bonds
666,844

 
666,408

 
435

 

 
1

Guarantees:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Coal
73,462

 
44,994

 
22,968

 
1,000

 
4,500

Gas
105,346

 
52,239

 
22,485

 

 
30,622

Other
374,311

 
72,335

 
120,230

 
72,514

 
109,232

Total Guarantees
553,119

 
169,568

 
165,683

 
73,514

 
144,354

Total Commitments
$
1,555,422

 
$
996,892

 
$
340,661

 
$
73,514

 
$
144,355


Employee-related financial guarantees have primarily been provided to support the United Mine Workers’ of America’s 1992 Benefit Plan and various state workers’ compensation self-insurance programs. Environmental financial guarantees have primarily been provided to support various performance bonds related to reclamation and other environmental issues. Gas financial guarantees have primarily been provided to support various performance bonds related to land usage and restorative issues. Other guarantees have been extended to support insurance policies, legal matters and various other items necessary in the normal course of business. Other guarantees have also been provided to promise the full and timely payments to lessors of mining equipment and support various other items necessary in the normal course of business.
CONSOL Energy and CNX Gas enter into long-term unconditional purchase obligations to procure major equipment purchases, natural gas firm transportation, gas drilling services and other operating goods and services. These purchase obligations are not recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. As of September 30, 2011 , the purchase obligations for each of the next five years and beyond were as follows:
 
Obligations Due
Amount
Less than 1 year
$
228,316

1 - 3 years
343,911

3 - 5 years
388,838

More than 5 years
1,855,746

Total Purchase Obligations
$
2,816,811




23



Costs related to these purchase obligations include:
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
September 30,
 
September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
Major equipment purchases
$
12,889

 
$
10,687

 
$
30,066

 
$
37,835

Firm transportation expense
15,225

 
9,021

 
43,359

 
25,124

Gas drilling obligations
24,423

 
5,934

 
74,587

 
6,564

Other
65

 
265

 
256

 
597

Total costs related to purchase obligations
$
52,602

 
$
25,907

 
$
148,268

 
$
70,120


NOTE 12—DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS:
CONSOL Energy enters into financial derivative instruments to manage our exposure to commodity price volatility. We measure each derivative instrument at fair value and record it on the balance sheet as either an asset or liability. Changes in the fair value of the derivatives are recorded currently in earnings unless special hedge accounting criteria are met. For derivatives designated as fair value hedges, the changes in fair value of both the derivative instrument and the hedged item are recorded in earnings. For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portions of changes in fair value of the derivative are reported in Other Comprehensive Income or Loss (OCI) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods which the forecasted transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portions of hedges are recognized in earnings in the current period. CONSOL Energy currently utilizes only cash flow hedges that are considered highly effective.
CONSOL Energy formally assesses both at inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis whether each derivative is highly effective in offsetting changes in the fair values or the cash flows of the hedged item. If it is determined that a derivative is not highly effective as a hedge or if a derivative ceases to be a highly effective hedge, CONSOL Energy will discontinue hedge accounting prospectively.
CONSOL Energy is exposed to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by counterparties. The creditworthiness of counterparties is subject to continuing review. The Company has not experienced any issues of non-performance by derivative counterparties.
CONSOL Energy has entered into swap contracts for natural gas to manage the price risk associated with the forecasted natural gas revenues. The objective of these hedges is to reduce the variability of the cash flows associated with the forecasted revenues from the underlying commodity. As of September 30, 2011 , the total notional amount of the Company’s outstanding natural gas swap contracts was 177.5 billion cubic feet. These swap contracts are forecasted to settle through December 31, 2014 and meet the criteria for cash flow hedge accounting. During the next twelve months, $ 56,720 of unrealized gain is expected to be reclassified from Other Comprehensive Income and into earnings, as a result of the settlement of cash flow hedges. No gains or losses have been reclassified into earnings as a result of the discontinuance of cash flow hedges.
The fair value at September 30, 2011 of CONSOL Energy's derivative instruments, which were all natural gas swaps and qualify as cash flow hedges, was an asset of $ 136,006 and a liability of $ 1,002 . The total asset is comprised of $ 93,243 and $ 42,763 which were included in Prepaid Expense and Other Assets, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The total liability is included in Other Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The effect of derivative instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended September 30, 2011 is as follows:
 
Derivative in Cash Flow Hedging Relationship
Amount of
Gain
Recognized
in OCI on
Derivative
2011
 
Location of
Gain
Reclassified
from
Accumulated
OCI into
Income
 
Amount of
Gain
Reclassified
from
Accumulated
OCI into
Income
2011
 
Location of
Gain
Recognized in
Income on
Derivative
 
Amount of
Gain Recognized
in Income on
Derivative
2011
Natural Gas Price Swaps
$
59,953

 
Outside Sales
 
$
20,974

 
Outside Sales
 
$
333

Total
$
59,953

 
 
 
$
20,974

 
 
 
$
333




24



The effect of derivative instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 is as follows:
Derivative in Cash Flow Hedging Relationship
Amount of
Gain
Recognized
in OCI on
Derivative
2011
 
Location of
Gain
Reclassified
from
Accumulated
OCI into
Income
 
Amount of
Gain
Reclassified
from
Accumulated
OCI into
Income
2011
 
Location of
Gain
Recognized in
Income on
Derivative
 
Amount of
Gain
Recognized
in Income on
Derivative
2011
Natural Gas Price Swaps
$
92,718

 
Outside Sales
 
$
56,719

 
Outside Sales
 
$
297

Total
$
92,718

 
 
 
$
56,719

 
 
 
$
297



The fair value at December 31, 2010 of CONSOL Energy's derivative instruments, which were all natural gas swaps and qualify as cash flow hedges, was an asset of $ 79,960 and a liability of $ 3,720 . The total asset is comprised of $ 52,022 and $ 27,938 which were included in Prepaid Expense and Other Assets, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The total liability is comprised of $ 3,191 and $ 529 which were included in Other Accrued Liabilities and Other Liabilities, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The effect of derivative instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended September 30, 2010 is as follows:
 
Derivative in Cash Flow Hedging Relationship
Amount of
Gain
Recognized
in OCI on
Derivative
2010
 
Location of
Gain
Reclassified
from
Accumulated
OCI into
Income
 
Amount of
Gain
Reclassified
from
Accumulated
OCI into
Income
2010
 
Location of
(Loss) Recognized
in Income on
Derivative
 
Amount of
(Loss) Recognized
in Income on
Derivative
2010
Natural Gas Price Swaps
$
43,367

 
Outside Sales
 
$
40,711

 
Outside Sales
 
$
(98
)
Total
$
43,367

 
 
 
$
40,711

 
 
 
$
(98
)

The effect of derivative instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 is as follows:
Derivative in Cash Flow Hedging Relationship
Amount of
Gain
Recognized
in OCI on
Derivative
2010
 
Location of
Gain
Reclassified
from
Accumulated
OCI into
Income
 
Amount of
Gain
Reclassified
from
Accumulated
OCI into
Income
2010
 
Location of
Gain
Recognized in
Income on
Derivative
 
Amount of
Gain
Recognized
in Income on
Derivative
2010
Natural Gas Price Swaps
$
132,895

 
Outside Sales
 
$
138,645

 
Outside Sales
 
$
50

Total
$
132,895

 
 
 
$
138,645

 
 
 
$
50





25



NOTE 13—OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS:
Total comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 is as follows:
 
 
Treasury
Rate
Lock
 
Change in
Fair Value
of Cash Flow
Hedges
 
Adjustments
for Actuarially
Determined
Liabilities
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
Balance at December 31, 2010
$
96

 
$
46,087

 
$
(920,521
)
 
$
(874,338
)
Net increase in value of cash flow hedge

 
92,718

 

 
92,718

Reclassification of cash flow hedges from other comprehensive income to earnings

 
(57,016
)
 

 
(57,016
)
Current period change
(96
)
 

 
37,836

 
37,740

Balance at September 30, 2011
$

 
$
81,789

 
$
(882,685
)
 
$
(800,896
)

NOTE 14—FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:
The financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:
 
 
Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2011
 
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2010
Description
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Liabilities
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Liabilities
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Gas Cash Flow Hedges
$

 
$
135,004

 
$

 
$

 
$
76,240

 
$


The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value for which the fair value option was not elected:
Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amount reported in the balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents approximates its fair value due to the short-term maturity of these instruments.
Restricted cash: The carrying amount reported in the balance sheets for restricted cash approximates its fair value due to the short-term maturity of these instruments.
Short-term notes payable: The carrying amount reported in the balance sheets for short-term notes payable approximates its fair value due to the short-term maturity of these instruments.
Borrowings under Securitization Facility : The carrying amount reported in the balance sheets for borrowings under the securitization facility approximates its fair value due to the short-term maturity of these instruments.
Long-term debt: The fair value of long-term debt is measured using unadjusted quoted market prices or estimated using discounted cash flow analyses. The discounted cash flow analyses are based on current market rates for instruments with similar cash flows.
The carrying amounts and fair values of financial instruments for which the fair value option was not elected are as follows:
 
 
September 30, 2011
 
December 31, 2010
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
Cash and cash equivalents
$
472,523

 
$
472,523

 
$
32,794

 
$
32,794

Restricted cash
$
20,291

 
$
20,291

 
$
20,291

 
$
20,291

Short-term notes payable
$

 
$

 
$
(284,000
)
 
$
(284,000
)
Borrowings under Securitization Facility
$

 
$

 
$
(200,000
)
 
$
(200,000
)
Long-term debt
$
(3,135,152
)
 
$
(3,282,549
)
 
$
(3,145,365
)
 
$
(3,341,406
)



26



NOTE 15—SEGMENT INFORMATION:
CONSOL Energy has two principal business divisions: Coal and Gas. The principal activities of the Coal division are mining, preparation and marketing of steam coal, sold primarily to power generators, and metallurgical coal, sold to metal and coke producers. The Coal division includes four reportable segments. These reportable segments are Steam, Low Volatile Metallurgical, High Volatile Metallurgical and Other Coal. Each of these reportable segments includes a number of operating segments (mines or type of coal sold). For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 , the Steam aggregated segment includes the following mines: Bailey, Blacksville #2, Enlow Fork, Fola Complex, Loveridge, McElroy, Miller Creek Complex, Robinson Run and Shoemaker. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 , the Low Volatile Metallurgical aggregated segment includes the Buchanan Mine. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 , the High Volatile Metallurgical aggregated segment includes: Bailey, Blacksville #2, Enlow Fork, Fola Complex, Loveridge, Miller Creek Complex and Robinson Run coal sales. The Other Coal segment includes our purchased coal activities, idled mine activities, as well as various other activities assigned to the Coal division but not allocated to each individual mine. The principal activity of the Gas division is to produce pipeline quality natural gas for sale primarily to gas wholesalers. The Gas division includes four reportable segments. These reportable segments are Coalbed Methane, Marcellus, Conventional and Other Gas. The Other Gas segment includes our purchased gas activities as well as various other activities assigned to the Gas division but not allocated to each individual well type. CONSOL Energy’s All Other segment includes terminal services, river and dock services, industrial supply services and other business activities. Intersegment sales have been recorded at amounts approximating market. Operating profit for each segment is based on sales less identifiable operating and non-operating expenses.




27



Industry segment results for three months ended September 30, 2011 are:
 
 
Steam
 
Low Volatile
Metallurgical
 
High Volatile
Metallurgical
 
Other
Coal
 
Total Coal
 
Coalbed
Methane
 
Marcellus
Shale
 
Conventional
Gas
 
Other
Gas
 
Total
Gas
 
All
Other
 
Corporate,
Adjustments
&
Eliminations
 
Consolidated
 
Sales—outside
$
732,135

 
$
307,969

 
$
83,065

 
$
12,593

 
$
1,135,762

 
$
116,954

 
$
39,036

 
$
38,974

 
$
3,410

 
$
198,374

 
$
87,553

 
$

 
$
1,421,689

 
Sales—purchased gas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
1,155

 
1,155

 

 

 
1,155

  
Sales—gas royalty interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
17,083

 
17,083

 

 

 
17,083

  
Freight—outside

 

 

 
59,871

 
59,871

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
59,871

  
Intersegment transfers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
726

 
726

 
49,668

 
(50,394
)
 

  
Total Sales and Freight
$
732,135

 
$
307,969

 
$
83,065

 
$
72,464

 
$
1,195,633

 
$
116,954

 
$
39,036

 
$
38,974

 
$
22,374

 
$
217,338

 
$
137,221

 
$
(50,394
)
 
$
1,499,798

  
Earnings (Loss) Before Income Taxes
$
83,505

 
$
200,742

 
$
24,091

 
$
(40,061
)
 
$
268,277

 
$
39,522

 
$
11,723

 
$
(8,602
)
 
$
(42,074
)
 
$
569

 
$
9,561

 
$
(77,985
)
 
$
200,422

(A)
Segment assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
5,131,432

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
5,959,480

 
$
329,207

 
$
742,929

 
$
12,163,048

(B)
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
96,797

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
58,131

 
$
4,822

 
$

 
$
159,750

  
Capital expenditures
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
182,588

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
215,830

 
$
13,604

 
$

 
$
412,022

  
 
(A)
Includes equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates of $ 4,842 , $ 693 and $ 3,142 for Coal, Gas and All Other, respectively.
(B)
Includes investments in unconsolidated equity affiliates of $ 33,037 , $ 91,853 and $ 50,928 for Coal, Gas and All Other, respectively.


28



Industry segment results for three months ended September 30, 2010 are:
 
 
Steam
 
Low Volatile
Metallurgical
 
High Volatile
Metallurgical
 
Other
Coal
 
Total
Coal
 
Coalbed
Methane
 
Marcellus
Shale
 
Conventional
Gas
 
Other
Gas
 
Total Gas
 
All
Other
 
Corporate,
Adjustments
&
Eliminations
 
Consolidated
 
Sales—outside
$
740,612

 
$
215,394

 
$
22,208

 
$
3,337

 
$
981,551

 
$
140,801

 
$
15,572

 
$
45,254

 
$
1,975

 
$
203,602

 
$
75,346

 
$

 
$
1,260,499

 
Sales—purchased gas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
3,524

 
3,524

 

 

 
3,524

  
Sales—gas royalty interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
18,131

 
18,131

 

 

 
18,131

  
Freight—outside

 

 

 
37,269

 
37,269

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
37,269

  
Intersegment transfers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
852

 
852

 
42,359

 
(43,211
)
 

  
Total Sales and Freight
$
740,612

 
$
215,394

 
$
22,208

 
$
40,606

 
$
1,018,820

 
$
140,801

 
$
15,572

 
$
45,254

 
$
24,482

 
$
226,109

 
$
117,705

 
$
(43,211
)
 
$
1,319,423

  
Earnings (Loss) Before Income Taxes
$
68,497

 
$
135,171

 
$
11,599

 
$
(96,684
)
 
$
118,583

 
$
59,259

 
$
2,591

 
$
(2,389
)
 
$
(23,938
)
 
$
35,523

 
$
8,853

 
$
(71,819
)
 
$
91,140

(C)
Segment assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
4,948,966

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
5,868,941

 
$
324,638

 
$
579,213

 
$
11,721,758

(D)
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
98,101

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
58,909

 
$
4,419

 
$

 
$
161,429

  
Capital expenditures
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
132,847

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
102,235

 
$
7,735

 
$

 
$
242,817

  
 
(C)
Includes equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates of $ 4,142 , $785 and $ 1,976 for Coal, Gas and All Other, respectively.
(D)
Includes investments in unconsolidated equity affiliates of $ 20,472 , $ 24,651 and $ 47,138 for Coal, Gas and All Other, respectively.
























29



Industry segment results for nine months ended September 30, 2011 are:


 
Steam
 
Low Volatile
Metallurgical
 
High Volatile
Metallurgical
 
Other
Coal
 
Total Coal
 
Coalbed
Methane
 
Marcellus
Shale
 
Conventional
Gas
 
Other
Gas
 
Total
Gas
 
All
Other
 
Corporate,
Adjustments
&
Eliminations
 
Consolidated
 
Sales—outside
$
2,315,467

 
$
824,035

 
$
278,986

 
$
59,465

 
$
3,477,953

 
$
346,713

 
$
88,316

 
$
119,899

 
$
8,696

 
$
563,624

 
$
251,590

 
$

 
$
4,293,167

 
Sales—purchased gas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
3,297

 
3,297

 

 

 
3,297

  
Sales—gas royalty interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
52,191

 
52,191

 

 

 
52,191

  
Freight—outside

 

 

 
156,311

 
156,311

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
156,311

  
Intersegment transfers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
2,648

 
2,648

 
158,307

 
(160,955
)
 

  
Total Sales and Freight
$
2,315,467

 
$
824,035

 
$
278,986

 
$
215,776

 
$
3,634,264

 
$
346,713

 
$
88,316

 
$
119,899

 
$
66,832

 
$
621,760

 
$
409,897

 
$
(160,955
)
 
$
4,504,966

  
Earnings (Loss) Before Income Taxes
$
372,653

 
$
524,855

 
$
111,012

 
$
(289,401
)
 
$
719,119

 
$
119,092

 
$
24,605

 
$
(14,434
)
 
$
(76,272
)
 
$
52,991

 
$
12,134

 
$
(233,961
)
 
$
550,283

(E)
Segment assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
5,131,432

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
5,959,480

 
$
329,207

 
$
742,929

 
$
12,163,048

(F)
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
293,793

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
159,109

 
$
13,710

 
$

 
$
466,612

  
Capital expenditures
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
435,818

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
535,067

 
$
26,578

 
$

 
$
997,463

  

(E) Includes equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates of $13,544 , $1,694 and $4,751 for Coal, Gas and All Other, respectively.
(F)
Includes investments in unconsolidated equity affiliates of $33,037 , $91,853 and $50,928 for Coal, Gas and All Other, respectively.





30



Industry segment results for nine months ended September 30, 2010 are:

 
Steam
 
Low Volatile
Metallurgical
 
High Volatile
Metallurgical
 
Other
Coal
 
Total Coal
 
Coalbed
Methane
 
Marcellus
Shale
 
Conventional
Gas
 
Other
Gas
 
Total
Gas
 
All
Other
 
Corporate,
Adjustments
&
Eliminations
 
Consolidated
 
Sales—outside
$
2,202,931

 
$
490,996

 
$
135,230

 
$
32,498

 
$
2,861,655

 
$
451,149

 
$
33,956

 
$
78,005

 
$
5,068

 
$
568,178

 
$
220,296

 
$

 
$
3,650,129

 
Sales—purchased gas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
8,280

 
8,280

 

 

 
8,280

  
Sales—gas royalty interests

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
46,621

 
46,621

 

 

 
46,621

  
Freight—outside

 

 

 
96,544

 
96,544

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
96,544

  
Intersegment transfers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
2,413

 
2,413

 
129,529

 
(131,942
)
 

  
Total Sales and Freight
$
2,202,931

 
$
490,996

 
$
135,230

 
$
129,042

 
$
2,958,199

 
$
451,149

 
$
33,956

 
$
78,005

 
$
62,382

 
$
625,492

 
$
349,825

 
$
(131,942
)
 
$
3,801,574

  
Earnings (Loss) Before Income Taxes
$
316,228

 
$
268,547

 
$
70,563

 
$
(306,170
)
 
$
349,168

 
$
211,179

 
$
4,953

 
$
998

 
$
(53,729
)
 
$
163,401

 
$
18,477

 
$
(201,590
)
 
$
329,456

(G)
Segment assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
4,948,966

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
5,868,941

 
$
324,638

 
$
579,213

 
$
11,721,758

(H)
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
259,849

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
139,954

 
$
13,576

 
$

 
$
413,379

  
Capital expenditures
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
517,515

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
3,766,694

 
$
11,898

 
$

 
$
4,296,107

  

(G) Includes equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates of $10,570 , $61 and $4,964 for Coal, Gas and All Other, respectively.
(H)
Includes investments in unconsolidated equity affiliates of $20,472 , $24,651 and $47,138 for Coal, Gas and All Other, respectively.



31




Reconciliation of Segment Information to Consolidated Amounts:
Earnings Before Income Taxes:
 
 
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
Segment Earnings Before Income Taxes for total reportable business segments
$
268,846

 
$
154,106

 
$
772,110

 
$
512,569

Segment Earnings Before Income Taxes for all other businesses
9,561

 
8,853

 
12,134

 
18,477

Interest income (expense), net and other non-operating activity (I)
(61,167
)
 
(69,819
)
 
(197,792
)
 
(139,092
)
Transaction and Financing Fees (I)
(14,907
)
 
(334
)
 
(14,907
)
 
(61,084
)
Evaluation fees for non-core asset dispositions (I)
(1,911
)
 
(1,788
)
 
(5,172
)
 
(1,788
)
Loss on debt extinguishment

 

 
(16,090
)
 

Operating lease cease-use

 
122

 

 
374

Earnings Before Income Taxes
$
200,422

 
$
91,140

 
$
550,283

 
$
329,456

 
Total Assets:
September 30,
2011
 
2010
Segment assets for total reportable business segments
$
11,090,912

 
$
10,817,907

Segment assets for all other businesses
329,207

 
324,638

Items excluded from segment assets:
 
 
 
Cash and other investments (I)
64,436

 
14,996

Recoverable income taxes
11,504

 
27,907

Deferred tax assets
616,105

 
482,836

Bond issuance costs
50,884

 
53,474

Total Consolidated Assets
$
12,163,048

 
$
11,721,758

_________________________ 
(I) Excludes amounts specifically related to the gas segment.

NOTE 16—GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
The payment obligations under the $1,500,000 , 8.000% per annum notes due April 1, 2017 , the $1,250,000 , 8.250% per annum notes due April 1, 2020 , and the $250,000 , 6.375%  per annum notes due March 1, 2021 issued by CONSOL Energy are jointly and severally, and also fully and unconditionally guaranteed by substantially all subsidiaries of CONSOL Energy. In accordance with positions established by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the following financial information sets forth separate financial information with respect to the parent, CNX Gas, a guarantor subsidiary, the remaining guarantor subsidiaries and the non-guarantor subsidiaries. The principal elimination entries include investments in subsidiaries and certain intercompany balances and transactions. CONSOL Energy, the parent, and a guarantor subsidiary manage several assets and liabilities of all other wholly owned subsidiaries. These include, for example, deferred tax assets, cash and other post-employment liabilities. These assets and liabilities are reflected as parent company or guarantor company amounts for purposes of this presentation.



32



Income Statement for the three months ended September 30, 2011 (unaudited):
 
 
Parent
Issuer
 
CNX Gas
Guarantor
 
Other
Subsidiary
Guarantors
 
Non-
Guarantors
 
Elimination
 
Consolidated
Sales—Outside
$

 
$
199,100

 
$
1,163,339

 
$
60,873

 
$
(1,623
)
 
$
1,421,689

Sales—Purchased Gas

 
1,155

 

 

 

 
1,155

Sales—Gas Royalty Interests

 
17,083

 

 

 

 
17,083

Freight—Outside

 

 
59,871

 

 

 
59,871

Other Income (including equity earnings)
232,472

 
(13,788
)
 
33,414

 
1,412

 
(231,579
)
 
21,931

Total Revenue and Other Income
232,472

 
203,550

 
1,256,624

 
62,285

 
(233,202
)
 
1,521,729

Cost of Goods Sold and Other Operating Charges
23,375

 
91,376

 
682,055

 
58,401

 
24,061

 
879,268

Purchased Gas Costs

 
398

 

 

 

 
398

Transaction and Financing Fees
14,907

 

 

 

 

 
14,907

Gas Royalty Interests’ Costs

 
15,420

 

 

 
(11
)
 
15,409

Related Party Activity
2,653

 

 
(8,346
)
 
478

 
5,215

 

Freight Expense

 

 
59,871

 

 

 
59,871

Selling, General and Administrative Expense

 
28,266

 
43,627

 
472

 
(25,673
)
 
46,692

Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
3,301

 
58,131

 
97,745

 
573

 

 
159,750

Abandonment of Long- Lived Assets

 

 
338

 

 

 
338

Interest Expense
58,421

 
2,332

 
(1,784
)
 
13

 
(98
)
 
58,884

Taxes Other Than Income
1,805

 
7,154

 
76,137

 
694

 

 
85,790

Total Costs
104,462

 
203,077

 
949,643

 
60,631

 
3,494

 
1,321,307

Earnings (Loss) Before Income Taxes
128,010

 
473

 
306,981

 
1,654

 
(236,696
)
 
200,422

Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
(39,319
)
 
(2,440
)
 
74,226

 
626

 

 
33,093

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to CONSOL Energy Inc. Shareholders
$
167,329

 
$
2,913

 
$
232,755

 
$
1,028

 
$
(236,696
)
 
$
167,329




33



Balance Sheet at September 30, 2011 (unaudited):
 
 
Parent
Issuer
 
CNX Gas
Guarantor
 
Other
Subsidiary
Guarantors
 
Non-
Guarantors
 
Elimination
 
Consolidated
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
$
61,738

 
$
408,723

 
$
1,700

 
$
362

 
$

 
$
472,523

Accounts and Notes Receivable:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trade

 
62,629

 
609

 
439,838

 

 
503,076

Securitized

 

 

 

 

 

Other
4,209

 
313,695

 
10,162

 
3,548

 

 
331,614

Inventories

 
6,481

 
193,071

 
42,139

 

 
241,691

Recoverable Income Taxes
(9,031
)
 
40,451

 
(19,916
)
 

 

 
11,504

Deferred Income Taxes
173,522

 
(16,275
)
 

 

 

 
157,247

Prepaid Expenses
21,128

 
98,802

 
61,562

 
2,771

 

 
184,263

Total Current Assets
251,566

 
914,506

 
247,188

 
488,658

 

 
1,901,918

Property, Plant and Equipment:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property, Plant and Equipment
191,015

 
5,355,103

 
8,266,417

 
24,728

 

 
13,837,263

Less-Accumulated Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
106,605

 
731,781

 
3,910,824

 
16,953

 

 
4,766,163

Property, Plant and Equipment-Net
84,410

 
4,623,322

 
4,355,593

 
7,775

 

 
9,071,100

Other Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deferred Income Taxes
907,287

 
(448,429
)
 

 

 

 
458,858

Investment in Affiliates
8,718,375

 
91,853

 
890,705

 

 
(9,525,115
)
 
175,818

Restricted Cash
20,291

 

 

 

 

 
20,291

Other
136,489

 
353,794

 
34,487

 
10,293

 

 
535,063

Total Other Assets
9,782,442

 
(2,782
)
 
925,192

 
10,293

 
(9,525,115
)
 
1,190,030

Total Assets
$
10,118,418

 
$
5,535,046

 
$
5,527,973

 
$
506,726

 
$
(9,525,115
)
 
$
12,163,048

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accounts Payable
$
120,557

 
$
184,771

 
$
132,130

 
$
11,209

 
$

 
$
448,667

Accounts Payable (Recoverable)—Related Parties
2,800,011

 
4,255

 
(3,164,631
)
 
360,365

 

 

Current Portion Long-Term Debt
779

 
5,244

 
13,514

 
769

 

 
20,306

Other Accrued Liabilities
534,450

 
54,223

 
233,440

 
11,826

 

 
833,939

Total Current Liabilities
3,455,797

 
248,493

 
(2,785,547
)
 
384,169

 

 
1,302,912

Long-Term Debt:
3,000,932

 
50,565

 
125,835

 
1,400

 

 
3,178,732

Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions

 

 
3,094,164

 

 

 
3,094,164

Pneumoconiosis Benefits

 

 
177,162

 

 

 
177,162

Mine Closing

 

 
401,049

 

 

 
401,049

Gas Well Closing

 
63,094

 
55,431

 

 

 
118,525

Workers’ Compensation

 

 
149,651

 
176

 

 
149,827

Salary Retirement
114,543

 

 

 

 

 
114,543

Reclamation

 

 
39,513

 

 

 
39,513

Other
120,403

 
22,984

 
16,487

 
4

 

 
159,878

Total Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities
234,946

 
86,078

 
3,933,457

 
180

 

 
4,254,661

Total CONSOL Energy Inc. Stockholders’ Equity
3,426,743

 
5,149,910

 
4,254,228

 
120,977

 
(9,525,115
)
 
3,426,743

Noncontrolling Interest

 

 

 

 

 

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
$
10,118,418

 
$
5,535,046

 
$
5,527,973

 
$
506,726

 
$
(9,525,115
)
 
$
12,163,048




34



Income Statement for the three months ended September 30, 2010 (unaudited):
 
 
Parent
Issuer
 
CNX Gas
Guarantor
 
Other
Subsidiary
Guarantors
 
Non-
Guarantors
 
Elimination
 
Consolidated
Sales—Outside
$

 
$
204,454

 
$
1,010,530

 
$
47,981

 
$
(2,466
)
 
$
1,260,499

Sales—Purchased Gas

 
3,524

 

 

 

 
3,524

Sales—Gas Royalty Interests

 
18,131

 

 

 

 
18,131

Freight—Outside

 

 
37,269

 

 

 
37,269

Other Income (including equity earnings)
121,067

 
1,642

 
18,548

 
8,455

 
(119,842
)
 
29,870

Total Revenue and Other Income
121,067

 
227,751

 
1,066,347

 
56,436

 
(122,308
)
 
1,349,293

Cost of Goods Sold and Other Operating Charges
25,292

 
76,093

 
685,015

 
47,339

 
17,080

 
850,819

Purchased Gas Costs

 
3,333

 

 

 

 
3,333

Transaction and Financing Fees
333

 
2

 
2

 

 

 
337

Gas Royalty Interests’ Costs

 
16,424

 

 

 
(16
)
 
16,408

Related Party Activity
(11,119
)
 

 
(5,428
)
 
490

 
16,057

 

Freight Expense

 

 
37,269

 

 

 
37,269

Selling, General and Administrative Expense

 
25,375

 
34,230

 
342

 
(21,225
)
 
38,722

Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
2,548

 
58,909

 
99,310

 
662

 

 
161,429

Interest Expense
61,789

 
2,154

 
2,574

 
6

 
(93
)
 
66,430

Taxes Other Than Income
2,352

 
10,031

 
70,366

 
657

 

 
83,406

Total Costs
81,195

 
192,321

 
923,338

 
49,496

 
11,803

 
1,258,153

Earnings (Loss) Before Income Taxes
39,872

 
35,430

 
143,009

 
6,940

 
(134,111
)
 
91,140

Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
(35,511
)
 
14,097

 
34,545

 
2,626

 

 
15,757

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to CONSOL Energy Inc. Shareholders
$
75,383

 
$
21,333

 
$
108,464

 
$
4,314

 
$
(134,111
)
 
$
75,383



35



Balance Sheet at December 31, 2010 :
 
 
Parent
Issuer
 
CNX Gas
Guarantor
 
Other
Subsidiary
Guarantors
 
Non-
Guarantors
 
Elimination
 
Consolidated
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
$
11,382

 
$
16,559

 
$
3,235

 
$
1,618

 
$

 
$
32,794

Accounts and Notes Receivable:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trade

 
65,197

 
646

 
186,687

 

 
252,530

Securitized
200,000

 

 

 

 

 
200,000

Other
4,635

 
3,361

 
10,915

 
2,678

 

 
21,589

Inventories

 
4,456

 
203,962

 
50,120

 

 
258,538

Recoverable Income Taxes
(3,189
)
 
35,717

 

 

 

 
32,528

Deferred Income Taxes
173,211

 
960

 

 

 

 
174,171

Prepaid Expenses
35,297

 
57,907

 
39,309

 
10,343

 

 
142,856

Total Current Assets
421,336

 
184,157

 
258,067

 
251,446

 

 
1,115,006

Property, Plant and Equipment:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Property, Plant and Equipment
166,884

 
6,336,121

 
8,422,235

 
26,118

 

 
14,951,358

Less-Accumulated Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
91,952

 
628,506

 
4,083,693

 
17,956

 

 
4,822,107

Property, Plant and Equipment-Net
74,932

 
5,707,615

 
4,338,542

 
8,162

 

 
10,129,251

Other Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deferred Income Taxes
902,188

 
(417,342
)
 

 

 

 
484,846

Investment in Affiliates
7,833,948

 
23,569

 
943,674

 
11,087

 
(8,718,769
)
 
93,509

Restricted Cash
20,291

 

 

 

 

 
20,291

Other
118,149

 
37,268

 
61,532

 
10,758

 

 
227,707

Total Other Assets
8,874,576

 
(356,505
)
 
1,005,206

 
21,845

 
(8,718,769
)
 
826,353

Total Assets
$
9,370,844

 
$
5,535,267

 
$
5,601,815

 
$
281,453

 
$
(8,718,769
)
 
$
12,070,610

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accounts Payable
$
130,063

 
$
101,944

 
$
113,036

 
$
8,968

 
$

 
$
354,011

Accounts Payable (Recoverable)-Related Parties
2,363,108

 
30,302

 
(2,543,991
)
 
150,581

 

 

Short-Term Notes Payable
155,000

 
129,000

 

 

 

 
284,000

Current Portion of Long-Term Debt
758

 
9,851

 
13,589

 
585

 

 
24,783

Borrowings under Securitization Facility
200,000

 

 

 

 

 
200,000

Other Accrued Liabilities
302,788

 
59,960

 
425,735

 
13,508

 

 
801,991

Total Current Liabilities
3,151,717

 
331,057

 
(1,991,631
)
 
173,642

 

 
1,664,785

Long-Term Debt:
3,000,702

 
58,905

 
125,627

 
904

 

 
3,186,138

Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions

 

 
3,077,390

 

 

 
3,077,390

Pneumoconiosis Benefits

 

 
173,616

 

 

 
173,616

Mine Closing

 

 
393,754

 

 

 
393,754

Gas Well Closing

 
60,027

 
70,951

 

 

 
130,978

Workers’ Compensation

 

 
148,265

 
49

 

 
148,314

Salary Retirement
161,173

 

 

 

 

 
161,173

Reclamation

 

 
53,839

 

 

 
53,839

Other
112,775

 
25,483

 
6,352

 

 

 
144,610

Total Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities
273,948

 
85,510

 
3,924,167

 
49

 

 
4,283,674

Total CONSOL Energy Inc. Stockholders’ Equity
2,944,477

 
5,068,259

 
3,543,652

 
106,858

 
(8,718,769
)
 
2,944,477

Noncontrolling Interest

 
(8,464
)
 

 

 

 
(8,464
)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
$
9,370,844

 
$
5,535,267

 
$
5,601,815

 
$
281,453

 
$
(8,718,769
)
 
$
12,070,610



36



Income Statement for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 (unaudited):

 
Parent
Issuer
 
CNX Gas
Guarantor
 
Other
Subsidiary
Guarantors
 
Non-
Guarantors
 
Elimination
 
Consolidated
Sales—Outside
$

 
$
566,272

 
$
3,559,954

 
$
171,027

 
$
(4,086
)
 
$
4,293,167

Sales—Purchased Gas

 
3,297

 

 

 

 
3,297

Sales—Gas Royalty Interests

 
52,191

 

 

 

 
52,191

Freight—Outside

 

 
156,311

 

 

 
156,311

Other Income (including equity earnings)
629,116

 
(9,473
)
 
55,051

 
20,008

 
(624,634
)
 
70,068

Total Revenue and Other Income
629,116

 
612,287

 
3,771,316

 
191,035

 
(628,720
)
 
4,575,034

Cost of Goods Sold and Other Operating Charges
86,775

 
238,158

 
2,059,011

 
166,106

 
70,326

 
2,620,376

Purchased Gas Costs

 
2,850

 

 

 

 
2,850

Transaction and Financing Fees
14,907

 

 

 

 

 
14,907

Loss on Debt Extinguishment
16,090

 

 

 

 

 
16,090

Gas Royalty Interests’ Costs

 
46,620

 

 

 
(38
)
 
46,582

Related Party Activity
117

 

 
(21,083
)
 
1,479

 
19,487

 

Freight Expense

 

 
156,122

 

 

 
156,122

Selling, General and Administrative Expense

 
82,053

 
121,562

 
1,072

 
(74,376
)
 
130,311

Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
8,665

 
159,109

 
297,017

 
1,821

 

 
466,612

Abandonment of Long-Lived Assets

 

 
115,817

 

 

 
115,817

Interest Expense
178,849

 
7,564

 
3,799

 
40

 
(289
)
 
189,963

Taxes Other Than Income
5,191

 
23,230

 
234,411

 
2,289

 

 
265,121

Total Costs
310,594

 
559,584

 
2,966,656

 
172,807

 
15,110

 
4,024,751

Earnings (Loss) Before Income Taxes
318,522

 
52,703

 
804,660

 
18,228

 
(643,830
)
 
550,283

Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
(118,340
)
 
18,029

 
206,837

 
6,895

 

 
113,421

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to CONSOL Energy Inc. Shareholders
$
436,862

 
$
34,674

 
$
597,823

 
$
11,333

 
$
(643,830
)
 
$
436,862





37



Income Statement for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 (unaudited):

 
Parent
Issuer
 
CNX Gas
Guarantor
 
Other
Subsidiary
Guarantors
 
Non-
Guarantors
 
Elimination
 
Consolidated
Sales—Outside
$

 
$
570,591

 
$
2,939,338

 
$
145,151

 
$
(4,951
)
 
$
3,650,129

Sales—Purchased Gas

 
8,280

 

 

 

 
8,280

Sales—Gas Royalty Interests

 
46,621

 

 

 

 
46,621

Freight—Outside

 

 
96,544

 

 

 
96,544

Other Income (including equity earnings)
399,464

 
3,066

 
41,033

 
22,704

 
(389,141
)
 
77,126

Total Revenue and Other Income
399,464

 
628,558

 
3,076,915

 
167,855

 
(394,092
)
 
3,878,700

Cost of Goods Sold and Other Operating Charges
68,014

 
184,209

 
1,998,686

 
138,730

 
46,813

 
2,436,452

Purchased Gas Costs

 
6,980

 

 

 

 
6,980

Transaction and Financing Fees
61,083

 
3,330

 
2

 

 

 
64,415

Gas Royalty Interests’ Costs

 
40,182

 

 

 
(49
)
 
40,133

Related Party Activity
(12,357
)
 

 
(10,293
)
 
1,458

 
21,192

 

Freight Expense

 

 
96,544

 

 

 
96,544

Selling, General and Administrative Expense

 
63,067

 
95,595

 
982

 
(51,747
)
 
107,897

Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
8,377

 
139,954

 
263,046

 
2,002

 

 
413,379

Interest Expense
125,787

 
6,177

 
7,909

 
16

 
(276
)
 
139,613

Taxes Other Than Income
7,755

 
21,534

 
212,404

 
2,138

 

 
243,831

Total Costs
258,659

 
465,433

 
2,663,893

 
145,326

 
15,933

 
3,549,244

Earnings (Loss) Before Income Taxes
140,805

 
163,125

 
413,022

 
22,529

 
(410,025
)
 
329,456

Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
(101,515
)
 
62,672

 
105,611

 
8,523

 

 
75,291

Net Income (Loss)
$
242,320

 
$
100,453

 
$
307,411

 
$
14,006

 
$
(410,025
)
 
$
254,165

Less: Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest

 

 

 

 
(11,845
)
 
(11,845
)
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to CONSOL Energy Inc. Shareholders
$
242,320

 
$
100,453

 
$
307,411

 
$
14,006

 
$
(421,870
)
 
$
242,320




38



Cash Flow for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 (unaudited):
 
 
Parent
 
CNX Gas
Guarantor
 
Other Subsidiary Guarantors
 
Non-
Guarantors
 
Elimination
 
Consolidated
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities
$
515,622

 
$
313,221

 
$
425,702

 
$
(2,141
)
 
$

 
$
1,252,404

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Capital Expenditures
$
(26,578
)
 
$
(535,068
)
 
$
(435,817
)
 
$

 
$

 
$
(997,463
)
Distributions from Equity Affiliates

 
66,590

 
4,270

 

 

 
70,860

Other Investing Activities
10

 
688,505

 
5,304

 
1,472

 

 
695,291

Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities
$
(26,568
)
 
$
220,027

 
$
(426,243
)
 
$
1,472

 
$

 
$
(231,312
)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dividends Paid
$
(67,972
)
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
(67,972
)
Payments on Short-Term Borrowings
(155,000
)
 
(129,000
)
 

 

 

 
(284,000
)
Payments on Securitization Facility
(200,000
)
 

 

 

 

 
(200,000
)
Payments on Long-Term Notes, including redemption premium
(265,785
)
 

 

 

 

 
(265,785
)
Proceeds from Long-Term Notes
250,000

 

 

 

 

 
250,000

Debt Issuance and Financing Fees
(10,499
)
 
(5,040
)
 

 

 

 
(15,539
)
Other Financing Activities
10,559

 
(7,044
)
 
(994
)
 
(588
)
 

 
1,933

Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities
$
(438,697
)
 
$
(141,084
)
 
$
(994
)
 
$
(588
)
 
$

 
$
(581,363
)

Cash Flow for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 (unaudited):
 
 
Parent
 
CNX Gas
Guarantor
 
Other Subsidiary Guarantors
 
Non-
Guarantors
 
Elimination
 
Consolidated
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Operating Activities
$
(3,373,370
)
 
$
267,894

 
$
3,983,670

 
$
736

 
$

 
$
878,930

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Capital Expenditures
$

 
$
(292,495
)
 
$
(529,413
)
 
$

 
$

 
$
(821,908
)
Distributions from Equity Affiliates

 

 
6,867

 

 

 
6,867

Acquisition of Dominion Exploration and Production Business

 

 
(3,474,199
)
 

 

 
(3,474,199
)
Purchase of CNX Gas Noncontrolling Interest
(991,034
)
 

 

 

 

 
(991,034
)
Other Investing Activities

 
48

 
24,896

 

 

 
24,944

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
$
(991,034
)
 
$
(292,447
)
 
$
(3,971,849
)
 
$

 
$

 
$
(5,255,330
)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dividends Paid
$
(63,276
)
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
(63,276
)
(Payments on) Proceeds from Short-Term Borrowings
(279,000
)
 
20,050

 

 

 

 
(258,950
)
Proceeds from Securitization Facility
150,000

 

 

 

 

 
150,000

Proceeds from Long-Term Notes
2,750,000

 

 

 

 

 
2,750,000

Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock
1,828,862

 

 

 

 

 
1,828,862

Debt Issuance and Financing Fees
(92,998
)
 
8,774

 

 

 

 
(84,224
)
Other Financing Activities
12,051

 
4,524

 
(12,230
)
 
(382
)
 

 
3,963

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities
$
4,305,639

 
$
33,348

 
$
(12,230
)
 
$
(382
)
 
$

 
$
4,326,375



39




NOTE 17-RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS:

In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued an update to the Compensation-Retirement Benefits-Multiemployer Plans Subtopic 715-80 of the Accounting Standards Codification which is intended to provide financial statement users with more information to assess the potential future cash flow implications relating to an employer's participation in multiemployer pension plans. The required additional disclosures will also indicate the financial health of all of the significant plans in which the employer participates and assist a financial statement user to access additional information that is available outside the financial statements. The effective date of this update is December 15, 2011 with early adoption permitted. We believe adoption of this new guidance will not have a material impact on CONSOL Energy's financial statements as this update has an impact on presentation only.

In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued an update to the Comprehensive Income Topic of the Accounting Standards Codification intended to improve the comparability, consistency, and transparency of financial reporting and to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income. This update eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity, requires consecutive presentation of the statement of net income and other comprehensive income, and requires an entity to present reclassification adjustments on the face of the financial statements from other comprehensive income (OCI) to net income. The effective date of this update is December 15, 2011 with early adoption permitted. We believe adoption of this new guidance will not have a material impact on CONSOL Energy's financial statements as these updates have an impact on presentation only.


NOTE 18—SUBSEQUENT EVENTS:
On October 21, 2011, CONSOL Energy, through its subsidiary, CNX Gas Company LLC, completed a sale to Hess Ohio Developments, LLC (Hess) of 50% of its nearly 200,000 Utica Shale acres in Ohio for consideration of approximately $594,000 , of which $59,818 was paid at closing. Additionally, CONSOL Energy and Hess entered into a joint development agreement pursuant to which Hess agreed to pay approximately $534,000 in the form of a 50% drilling carry of certain CONSOL Energy working interest obligations as the acreage is developed. The estimated gain on the transaction is $52,737 and will be recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income as Other Income during the three months ended December 31, 2011. CONSOL Energy and Hess anticipate commencing initial drilling operations in the three months ended December 31, 2011.


40






41




ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
General
Third quarter demand for U.S. thermal and metallurgical coal continued at the strong pace set in the second quarter. Demand from domestic electric generators increased slightly over last year's record demand, but low natural gas prices have limited growth for coal producers. Continued international demand for U.S. coals, both thermal and metallurgical, has also been strong. Total U.S. coal exports are likely to exceed 100 million tons for 2011 - a level that has not been reached in nearly thirty years.

International demand for U.S. thermal coal was also strong in the third quarter as demonstrated by high market pricing. Prices for spot coal delivered into Europe had little volatility during the third quarter with prices trading within a $5.00 band. Trade to Europe has been limited to available port space along the U.S. east coast and has been increasingly turning to the U.S. Gulf coast as a departure point. Space at east coast terminals has been predominately claimed by higher value metallurgical coals, but port operators are optimizing capacities and rehabilitating facilities to take advantage of strong export markets. Demand growth has been spurred by traditional coal suppliers to Europe, Colombia and South Africa's entrance into new markets. Long-term exports to Europe are expected to remain strong as older nuclear units are retired and subsidized mining in Europe is phased-out.

Domestically, September coal inventories at electric generators were 19 to 22 million tons below last year's level. U.S. electric demand during the third quarter of 2011 was estimated to be comparable to 2010 levels - which were unusually high due to record cooling days across much of the country. Similarly, coal inventories at electric utilities in CONSOL Energy's traditional markets are at the lowest levels in six years as consecutive high cooling load summers, coupled with record deliveries to export facilities, have reduced stockpiles at generators.

CONSOL Energy's thermal coal continues to be sold out for 2011. During the three months ended September 30, 2011, CONSOL Energy priced 17 million tons of thermal coal for 2012 at an average price of $64.10, which raised our average realized price for 2012 to $62.37 per ton. CONSOL Energy is already approximately 84% sold out of this category for 2012. If tightening regulations are deferred allowing older coal fired plants to continue running, generators may be in need of additional coal supplies. Current customer inventories in our sales area are very low. Export thermal demand continues to grow with an additional 250 thousand tons sold in the three months ended September 30, 2011 for 2012 deliveries to European utility customers at prices higher than domestic thermal sales and nearly equal to our high volatile metallurgical coal sales. The Company expects total export thermal sales for 2011 to be 2.3 million tons.

Metallurgical coal demand continued the strong pace set earlier this year as world blast furnace output increased 6.4% during the first nine months of 2011 compared to the same period of 2010. China continues to provide the bulk of world iron production with almost 59% of world production and a 8.5% year-to-date increase compared to the same period in 2010. Although European steelmakers have shown signs of a slowdown, global production remains strong in Asia. In particular, Japanese industry has been increasing production, indicating a recovery from this year's earthquake and tsunami.

Supply of metallurgical coal continues to remain tight due to the continued rapid increase in demand as well as lingering problems associated with bringing Australian mines back into full production after spring flooding. The strong global demand for steel combined with tight supply has created a very strong market for metallurgical coal. CONSOL Energy is well positioned to take advantage of this market with its low cost Buchanan low-vol operation, low cost Northern Appalachia high-vol operations and mid-vol operations set to open in early 2012.

High demand continues for CONSOL Energy's Buchanan Mine low volatile metallurgical coal and supply remains constrained by global weather and labor issues. In 2012, excluding legacy contracts for 221 thousand tons, CONSOL Energy has already sold 0.9 million tons of Buchanan coal priced at $213 per short ton, FOB mine. High volatile metallurgical coal continues to benefit from increased market penetration into Asia as well as sales into new markets for testing purposes. As a result of a prior test, CONSOL Energy has signed a new sales order with a U.S. customer for 700 thousand tons in 2012, at prices within expectations. Two additional tests with European steel makers continues. Demand for CONSOL Energy's high volatile metallurgical coal will continue to be dependent on our ability to increase market penetration. CONSOL Energy has 3.7 million tons unpriced for 2012.



42



COAL DIVISION GUIDANCE
(Tons in millions)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4Q 2011
 
2011
 
2012
 
2013
Estimated Coal Sales
 
14.7-15.3

 
62.0-62.6

 
59.5-61.5

 
60.5-62.5

   Estimated Low-Vol Met Sales
 
1.0-1.2

 
5.3-5.5

 
4.5-5.0

 
4.5-5.0

     Tonnage - Firm
 
0.7

 
5.0

 
1.1

 
0.2

     Tonnage - Open
 
0.3-0.5

 
0.3-0.5

 
3.4-3.9

 
4.3-4.8

     Average Price - Sold (firm)
 
$199.72
 
$192.92
 
$185.48
 
$91.74
     Price - Estimated (for open tonnage)
 
$210-$220

 
$210-$220

 
$180-$190

 
N/A

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   Estimated High-Vol Met Sales
 
1.5

 
5.1

 
5.0

 
5.0

     Tonnage - Firm
 
1.2

 
4.8

 
1.2

 
0.2

     Tonnage - Open
 
0.3

 
0.3

 
3.8

 
4.8

     Average Price - Sold (firm)
 
$75.01
 
$79.40
 
$81.96
 
$90.20
     Price - Estimated (for open tonnage)
 
$74-$80

 
$74-$80

 
$70-$75

 
N/A

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   Estimated Thermal Sales
 
approx. 12.4

 
approx. 52.0

 
approx. 50.5

 
approx. 51.0

     Tonnage - Firm
 
12.4

 
52.0

 
41.9

 
21.3

     Tonnage - Open
 

 

 
N/A

 
N/A

     Average Price - Sold (firm)
 
$58.47
 
$58.77
 
$62.37
 
$61.87
     Price - Estimated (for open tonnage)
 
N/A

 
N/A

 
N/A

 
N/A

Note: N/A means not available or not forecasted. In the thermal sales category, the open tonnage includes 4.7 million collared tons in 2013, with a ceiling of $59.78 per ton and a floor of $51.63 per ton. Total estimated coal sales for 2012 and 2013 include 0.4 and 0.6 million tons, respectively, from the Amonate complex. The Amonate complex tons are not included in the category breakdowns. None of the Amonate complex tons have been sold.

Natural gas markets enjoyed record third quarter demand as the second consecutive year of very high cooling degree days caused record demand for gas from electric generators. Supply however, has continued to grow at strong rates due to the prolific nature of new shale resources. This supply / demand imbalance is being brought back into balance in the short term by decreased imports from liquefied natural gas (LNG) and Western Canadian pipeline imports as well as increased exports to Eastern Canada and Mexico. CONSOL Energy believes longer-term rebalancing will be aided by declining conventional production and the shift in drilling towards oil and “liquids rich” gas plays.

Longer-term prospects for natural gas markets remain appealing as the U.S. continues to build more high-efficiency gas electric power plants and gas consumption increases in the petrochemical industry and developing sources of demand such as more wide-scale use of natural gas vehicles. CONSOL Energy continues to believe that natural gas will enhance the value of its portfolio of long-lived energy resources.

CONSOL Energy expects its net gas production to be between 150-152 Bcf for the year ended December 31, 2011. Gas production for the three months ended December 31, 2011 is expected to be approximately 36-38 Bcf, net to CONSOL Energy.

A return to normal weather patterns could have a negative short-term impact on CONSOL Energy's natural gas and domestic thermal coal demand. Additionally, there is uncertainty in the short-term economic outlook driven by the European sovereign debt crisis, high U.S. unemployment rates and instability in the Middle East oil-producing region. This uncertainty makes a slowing of global economic expansion more possible. However, the fundamental long-term drivers of CONSOL Energy's business remain unchanged as global demand for low-cost, reliable sources of energy and metallurgical coal remain strong in both the developed and developing world.



43



CONSOL Energy engaged in several business and financing transactions in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the related subsequent event period. These transactions include the following:
On October 27, 2011, CONSOL Energy's Board of Directors increased the regular annual dividend by 25%, or $0.10 per share, to $0.50 per share.

On October 21, 2011, CONSOL Energy, through its subsidiary, CNX Gas Company LLC, completed a sale to Hess Ohio Developments, LLC (Hess) of 50% of its nearly 200,000 Utica Shale acres in Ohio for consideration of approximately $594 million, of which $60 million was paid at closing. Additionally, CONSOL Energy and Hess entered into a joint development agreement pursuant to which Hess agreed to pay approximately $534 million in the form of a 50% drilling carry of certain CONSOL Energy working interest obligations as the acreage is developed. CONSOL Energy and Hess anticipate commencing initial drilling operations in the fourth quarter of 2011.

On September 30, 2011, CNX Gas Company LLC (CNX Gas) completed a sale to Noble Energy, Inc. (Noble) of 50% of the Company's undivided interest in certain Marcellus Shale oil and gas properties in West Virginia and Pennsylvania covering approximately 628,000 acres and 50% of the Company's undivided interest in certain of its existing Marcellus Shale wells and related leases. On September 30, 2011, cash proceeds of $519 million were received from Noble. In addition to the cash proceeds, a one year note receivable due on September 30, 2012 in the amount of $312 million and a two year note receivable due on September 30, 2013 in the amount of $296 million have been recorded. As part of the transaction, CONSOL Energy also received a commitment from Noble to pay one-third of the Company's working interest share of certain drilling and completion costs, up to approximately $2.1 billion with certain restrictions.
    
On September 30 2011, CNX Gas and Noble formed CONE Gathering LLC (CONE), a joint venture established to develop and operate each company's gas gathering system needs in the Marcellus Shale play. CONSOL Energy contributed its existing Marcellus Shale gathering infrastructure which had a net book value of $133 million and Noble contributed cash of approximately $73 million. On September 30, 2011, CONE made a cash distribution to CONSOL Energy in the amount of $73 million.

On September 21, 2011, CONSOL Energy entered into an agreement with Antero Resources Appalachian Corp. (Antero), pursuant to which CONSOL Energy assigned to Antero overriding royalty interests (ORRI) of approximately 7% in 115,647 net acres of Marcellus Shale located in nine counties in southwestern Pennsylvania and north central West Virginia, in exchange for $193 million. The transaction became effective as of July 1, 2011.

CONSOL Energy incurred costs of approximately $15 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 related to the solicitation of consents from the holders of CONSOL's outstanding 8.00% Senior Notes due 2017, 8.25% Senior Notes due 2020 and 6.375% Senior Notes due 2021. The consents allowed an amendment of the indentures for each of those notes, clarifying that the transactions contemplated by the August 2011 Asset Acquisition Agreements with Noble Energy and Hess Energy were permissible under those indentures.
In June 2011, the Bituminous Coal Operators Association (BCOA) and the United Mine Workers of America (UMWA) reached a new collective bargaining agreement which will run from July 1, 2011 to December 31, 2016. That agreement, National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement of 2011 (2011 NBCWA) covers approximately 2,900 employees of CONSOL Energy subsidiaries. The 2011 NBCWA is the successor agreement to the 2007 NBCWA that was set to expire on December 31, 2011. Key elements of the new agreement include the following items:
a.
A wage increase of $1.00 per hour effective July 1, 2011, and an additional $1.00 per hour increase each January 1 st throughout the contract term.
b.
Contributions to the 1974 Pension Plan, a multi-employer plan, will continue at the current rate of $5.50 per hour throughout the contract term. New inexperienced miners hired after December 31, 2011 will not participate in the 1974 Pension Plan, but will receive a $1.00 per hour contribution (increasing to $1.50 per hour in 2014-2016) to the UMWA Cash Deferred Savings Plan (CDSP), which is a 401(k) Plan. UMWA represented employees with over 20 years of experience will receive a $1.00 per hour contribution (increasing to $1.50 per hour in 2014-2016) to the CDSP beginning January 1, 2012. All current UMWA represented employees will be given the opportunity to opt-out of future participation in the 1974 Pension Plan and instead participate in the CDSP.
c.
A $1.50 per hour contribution starting January 1, 2012 to a new defined contribution plan to provide retiree bonus payments to eligible retirees in 2014, 2015 and 2016.


44



d.
An increased contribution from $0.50 per hour to $1.10 per hour effective January 1, 2012 to the 1993 Benefit Plan, which is a defined contribution plan providing health benefits to certain retirees.
e.
Various other changes related to absenteeism, contribution to various UMWA benefit funds, eligibility for various vacation days and sick days.

The total incremental cost of the revised terms of the contract over 2010 operating costs at CONSOL Energy's represented operations is projected to average approximately 3.5% per ton, per year over the term of the contract. CONSOL Energy expects a similar increase to impact all of CONSOL Energy's tons due to cost inflation that typically occurs at CONSOL Energy's non-represented mines.

On October 24, 2011, certain subsidiaries of CONSOL Energy received notice from the trustees of the UMWA 1974 Pension Plan ("the Plan") stating that the Plan is considered to be in “seriously endangered” status for the plan year beginning July 1, 2011.  The status of the plan is due to the funded percentage and projected funding deficiency.  As a result, the Pension Protection Act requires the Plan to adopt a funding improvement plan no later than May 25, 2012, to improve the funded status of the Plan, which may include increased contributions to the Plan from employers in the future.  Because CONSOL Energy's subsidiaries are parties to the NBCWA which establishes their contribution obligations through December 31, 2016, such subsidiaries' contributions to the Plan will not increase as a consequence of any funding improvement plan adopted by the Plan to address the Plan's seriously endangered status.

In June 2011, CONSOL Energy management decided to permanently idle its Mine 84 underground facility. This facility had been on idle status since March 2009. Various options for the facility were explored, such as selling and operating with continuous miners, but management decided it was in the best interest of the Company to abandon the underground workings of this facility and reallocate resources into more profitable coal operations and Marcellus Shale drilling operations. The Company redeployed all of the movable equipment from the mine that could be used at other locations. The abandonment of this underground facility resulted in a $115 million charge to pre-tax earnings in June 2011. See Note 8—Property, Plant and Equipment in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for additional disclosure. The Company expects the closure of Mine 84 to result in pre-tax cash savings of $18 million per year.

In April 2011, CNX Gas entered into an amendment of its senior secured credit agreement which increases the availability under the agreement from $700 million to $1.0 billion, decreases the interest rate and extends the term from May 6, 2014 to April 12, 2016. The amended credit agreement continues to be secured by substantially all of the assets of CNX Gas and its subsidiaries.

In April 2011, CONSOL Energy amended and extended its existing $1.5 billion senior secured credit agreement, which decreases the interest rate and extends the term from May 7, 2014 to April 12, 2016. The amended agreement continues to be secured by substantially all of the assets of CONSOL Energy and certain of its subsidiaries.

On March 9, 2011, CONSOL Energy issued $250 million of 6.375% senior notes due March 2021. The Notes are guaranteed by substantially all of the Company's existing and future wholly owned domestic restricted subsidiaries. The Company issued the Notes with the intention of using the net proceeds to repay its outstanding 7.875% senior secured notes due March 1, 2012, on or before their maturity. On April 11, 2011, CONSOL Energy redeemed all of its outstanding $250 million, 7.875% senior secured notes due March 1, 2012 in accordance with the terms of the indenture governing the notes. By using the proceeds of the $250 million, 6.375% senior notes due March 2021 to affect this redemption, the Company effectively extended the maturity of the $250 million of long-term indebtedness nine years at a lower interest rate. The redemption price included principal of $250 million, a make-whole premium of $16 million and accrued interest of $2 million, for a total redemption cost of approximately $268 million. The loss on extinguishment of debt was approximately $16 million, which primarily represents the interest that would have been paid on these notes if they had been held to maturity.

CONSOL Energy is managing several significant matters that may affect our business and impact our financial results in the future including the following:

Challenges in the overall environment in which we operate create increased risks that we must continuously monitor and manage. These risks include (i) increased prices for commodities such as diesel fuel and synthetic rubber that we use in our operations and (ii) continued scrutiny of existing safety regulations and the development of new safety regulations.

Federal and state environmental regulators are reviewing our operations more closely and more strictly interpreting


45



and enforcing existing environmental laws and regulations, resulting in increased costs and delays. For example, we entered into a consent decree with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection pursuant to which we agreed to construct an advanced technology mine water treatment plant and related facilities to reduce high levels of total dissolved solids in water discharges from certain of our mines in Northern West Virginia, at a total estimated cost of approximately $200 million; in 2011 we plan to complete construction of pipelines to convey mine water from our Shoemaker Mine and the closed Windsor Mine to approved mixing zones in the Ohio River.

Federal and state regulators have proposed regulations which, if adopted, would adversely impact our business. These proposed regulations could require significant changes in the manner in which we operate and/or would increase the cost of our operations. For example, the Department of Interior, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM) is currently preparing an environmental impact statement relating to OSM's consideration of five alternatives for amending its coal mining stream protection rules. All of the alternatives, except the no action alternative, could make it more costly to mine our coal and/or could eliminate the ability to mine some of our coal. Further, other regulations would make it more expensive for our customers to operate their businesses, possibly inducing them to move to alternative fuel sources. For example, the EPA has issued a proposed rule that would regulate coal combustion residuals from coal fired electric generating facilities under the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) as either a hazardous waste under Subtitle C of RCRA or as a non-hazardous waste under Subtitle D of RCRA. If final rules are adopted consistent with either of the proposed alternatives, the cost of handling and disposal of coal combustion residuals could increase making it more expensive to generate electricity from coal. Another example is the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) that was finalized by the EPA on July 6, 2011. CSAPR replaces the Clean Air Interstate Rule and regulates the amount of SO 2 and NO x that power plants in 23 eastern states can emit in order to meet clean air requirements in downwind states. Some older coal fired power plants may be retired or have operation time reduced rather than install additional expensive emission controls which could reduce the amount of coal consumed.

On April 19, 2011, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection announced its intent to not renew permits for publicly owned treatment works (POTW) that treat municipal wastewater to accept wastewater from Marcellus Shale operators. They called on operators to cease delivering wastewater to the POTWs by May 19, 2011. CONSOL Energy has implemented a re-cycle and re-use process of its Marcellus derived water for fracing operations, and will only safely dispose of Marcellus wastewater in regulated, underground injection control wells.

CONSOL Energy continues to explore potential sales of non-core assets.


Results of Operations
Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 Compared with Three Months Ended September 30, 2010

Net Income Attributable to CONSOL Energy Shareholders
CONSOL Energy reported net income attributable to CONSOL Energy shareholders of $167 million, or $0.73 per diluted share, for the three months ended September 30, 2011 . Net income attributable to CONSOL Energy shareholders was $75 million, or $0.33 per diluted share, for the three months ended September 30, 2010 .
The coal division includes steam coal, high volatile metallurgical coal, low volatile metallurgical coal and other coal. The total coal division contributed $268 million of earnings before income tax for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $118 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 . The coal division sold 14.8 million tons of coal produced from CONSOL Energy mines, excluding our portion of tons sold from equity affiliates, for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to 15.4 million tons for the three months ended September 30, 2010 .
The average sales price and average costs per ton for all active coal operations were as follows:
 
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
Percent
Change
Average Sales Price per ton sold
$
76.60

 
$
63.71

 
$
12.89

 
20.2
%
Average Costs per ton sold
55.91

 
49.98

 
5.93

 
11.9
%
Margin
$
20.69

 
$
13.73

 
$
6.96

 
50.7
%


46




The higher average sales price per ton sold reflects continued gains that were achieved mainly by another strong quarter of our premium low volatile metallurgical coal, sustained demand for our high volatile metallurgical coal, and the continued benefit from higher negotiated prices for steam coal. Also, 2.5 million tons were sold on the export market at an average sales price of $139.58 per ton for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to 1.9 million tons at an average price of $110.83 per ton for the three months ended September 30, 2010.

Average costs per ton sold have increased in the period-to-period comparison due primarily to increased labor and labor related charges as a result of additional employees, increased overtime hours worked and the impact of the $1.50 per hour worked UMWA contract wage increases, $1.00 per hour worked related to the new UMWA contract and $0.50 per hour worked related to the prior UMWA contract, higher operating supplies and maintenance costs due to additional maintenance and equipment overhaul costs, additional roof control costs and higher costs associated with the sales price of coal sold, such as royalties and production related taxes. Also, depreciation, depletion and amortization costs increased due to additional assets placed in service after the 2010 period and increased expenses related to other post employment benefits (OPEB) and pension benefits. OPEB and pension expense increased due to employees retiring sooner than originally anticipated and average claim costs being higher than originally anticipated.

The total gas division includes coalbed methane (CBM), conventional, Marcellus and other gas. The total gas division did not significantly impact earnings before income tax for the three months ended September 30, 2011 when compared to $35 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 . Total gas production was 40.4 billion cubic feet for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to 35.8 billion cubic feet for the three months ended September 30, 2010 .
The average sales price and average costs for all active gas operations were as follows: 
 
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
Percent
Change
Average Sales Price per thousand cubic feet sold
$
4.92

 
$
5.72

 
$
(0.80
)
 
(14.0
)%
Average Costs per thousand cubic feet sold
3.93

 
4.08

 
(0.15
)
 
(3.7
)%
Margin
$
0.99

 
$
1.64

 
$
(0.65
)
 
(39.6
)%

Total gas division outside sales revenue was $199 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $205 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 . The decrease was primarily due to the 14.0% reduction in average sales price, offset, in part, by the 12.8% increase in volumes sold. The decrease in average sales price is the result of various gas swap transactions maturing in each period and lower average market prices. The gas swap transactions qualify as financial cash flow hedges that exist parallel to the underlying physical transactions. These financial hedges represented approximately 23.9 billion cubic feet of our produced gas sales volumes for the three months ended September 30, 2011 at an average price of $5.12 per thousand cubic feet. These financial hedges represented 13.6 billion cubic feet of our produced gas sales volumes for the three months ended September 30, 2010 at an average price of $7.39 per thousand cubic feet.
Total gas division costs decreased for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010 primarily due to lower depreciation, depletion and amortization and lower gathering and compression costs partially offset by higher lifting costs. Lower depreciation, depletion and amortization rates were the result of the higher gas reserves at December 31, 2010 reducing unit rates. Lower gathering and compression costs were the result of the increase in volumes sold as actual dollars remained consistent in the period-to-period comparison. Lifting costs increased in the period-to-period comparison due to increased road maintenance and increased well service costs.
The other segment includes industrial supplies activity, terminal, river and dock service activity, income taxes and other business activities not assigned to the coal or gas segment.
Included in both coal and gas unit costs are Selling, General and Administrative Expenses and total Company long-term liabilities, such as other post employment benefits (OPEB), the salary retirement plan, workers' compensation and long-term disability. A detailed analysis of these total Company expenses are as follows:
 


47



Total Company Selling, General and Administrative Expenses are allocated to various segments primarily based on revenue and capital expenditure projections between coal and gas as a percent of total. Total Company Selling, General and Administrative Expenses were made up of the following items:
 
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
Percent
Change
Employee wages and related expenses
$
21

 
$
19

 
$
2

 
10.5
%
Advertising and promotion
3

 
1

 
2

 
200.0
%
Contributions
3

 
1

 
2

 
200.0
%
Consulting and professional services
7

 
6

 
1

 
16.7
%
Miscellaneous
13

 
12

 
1

 
8.3
%
Total Company Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
$
47

 
$
39

 
$
8

 
20.5
%

Total Company Selling, General and Administrative Expenses increased due to the following:
Employee wages and related expenses increased $2 million which was primarily attributable to additional hiring of support staff in the period-to-period comparison.

Advertising and promotion expense increased $2 million in the period-to-period comparison due to additional campaigns initiated in the 2011 period.

Contributions expense increased $2 million due to various transactions that occurred throughout both periods, none of which were individually material.
Consulting and professional services increased $1 million due to various corporate projects that occurred throughout both periods, none of which were individually material.
Miscellaneous selling, general and administrative expenses increased $1 million primarily due to various corporate projects that occurred throughout both periods, none of which were individually material.
Total Company long-term liabilities, such as other post employment benefits (OPEB), the salary retirement plan, workers' compensation and long-term disability are actuarially calculated for the Company as a whole. The expenses are then allocated to operational units based on active employee counts or active salary dollars. Total CONSOL Energy expense related to our actuarial calculated liabilities was $83 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $70 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase of $13 million for total CONSOL Energy expense was due primarily to OPEB and salary pension expense. The higher OPEB and salary pension expense related to employees retiring sooner than originally anticipated and average claim costs being higher than previously anticipated. Also, higher long-term liability expenses in the period-to-period comparison were due to changes in the discount rates used at the measurement date, which is December 31. See Note 3—Components of Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans Net Periodic Benefit Costs and Note 4—Components of Coal Workers' Pneumoconiosis (CWP) and Workers' Compensation Net Periodic Benefit Costs in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for additional detail of total Company expense increases.



48




TOTAL COAL SEGMENT ANALYSIS for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010 :
The coal segment contributed $268 million of earnings before income tax for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $118 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 . Variances by the individual coal segments are discussed below.
 
 
For the Three Months Ended
 
Difference to Three Months Ended
 
September 30, 2011
 
September 30, 2010
 
Steam
Coal
 
High
Vol
Met
Coal
 
Low
Vol
Met
Coal
 
Other
Coal
 
Total
Coal
 
Steam
Coal
 
High
Vol
Met
Coal
 
Low
Vol
Met
Coal
 
Other
Coal
 
Total
Coal
Sales:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Produced Coal
$
732

 
$
82

 
$
308

 
$
9

 
$
1,131

 
$
(9
)
 
$
60

 
$
93

 
$
6

 
$
150

Purchased Coal

 

 

 
5

 
5

 

 

 

 
3

 
3

Total Outside Sales
732

 
82

 
308

 
14

 
1,136

 
(9
)
 
60

 
93

 
9

 
153

Freight Revenue

 

 

 
60

 
60

 

 

 

 
22

 
22

Other Income
2

 
3

 

 
24

 
29

 
1

 

 

 
8

 
9

Total Revenue and Other Income
734

 
85

 
308

 
98

 
1,225

 
(8
)
 
60

 
93

 
39

 
184

Costs and Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total operating costs
478

 
43

 
81

 
47

 
649

 
(40
)
 
33

 
20

 
12

 
25

Total provisions
54

 
6

 
9

 
11

 
80

 
3

 
5

 
2

 
(27
)
 
(17
)
Total administrative & other costs
43

 
5

 
8

 
17

 
73

 
8

 
4

 
3

 
(7
)
 
8

Depreciation, depletion and amortization
75

 
7

 
9

 
4

 
95

 
5

 
5

 
3

 
(17
)
 
(4
)
Total Costs and Expenses
650

 
61

 
107

 
79

 
897

 
(24
)
 
47

 
28

 
(39
)
 
12

Freight Expense

 

 

 
60

 
60

 

 

 

 
22

 
22

Total Costs
650

 
61

 
107

 
139

 
957

 
(24
)
 
47

 
28

 
(17
)
 
34

Earnings (Loss) Before Income Taxes
$
84

 
$
24

 
$
201

 
$
(41
)
 
$
268

 
$
16

 
$
13

 
$
65

 
$
56

 
$
150






49



STEAM COAL SEGMENT
The steam coal segment contributed $84 million to total Company earnings before income tax for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $68 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 . The steam coal revenue and cost components on a per unit basis for these periods were as follows:
 
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
Percent
Change
Produced Steam Tons Sold (in millions)
12.2

 
13.7

 
(1.5
)
 
(10.9
)%
Average Sales Price Per Steam Ton Sold
$
60.18

 
$
54.02

 
$
6.16

 
11.4
 %
Average Operating Costs Per Steam Ton Sold
$
39.21

 
$
37.82

 
$
1.39

 
3.7
 %
Average Provision Costs Per Steam Ton Sold
$
4.49

 
$
3.74

 
$
0.75

 
20.1
 %
Average Selling, Administrative and Other Costs Per Steam Ton Sold
$
3.52

 
$
2.51

 
$
1.01

 
40.2
 %
Average Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization Costs Per Steam Ton Sold
$
6.21

 
$
5.07

 
$
1.14

 
22.5
 %
     Total Average Costs Per Steam Ton Sold
$
53.43

 
$
49.14

 
$
4.29

 
8.7
 %
     Margin Per Steam Ton Sold
$
6.75

 
$
4.88

 
$
1.87

 
38.3
 %

Steam coal revenue was $732 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $741 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 . The $9 million decrease was attributable to the 1.5 million ton reduction in steam tons sold partially offset by the $6.16 per ton higher average sales price. The sales ton decrease was primarily due to a roof fall at the McElroy Mine and the 0.7 million tons of steam coal sold on the high volatile metallurgical coal market for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010. The higher average steam coal sales price in the 2011 period was the result of successful re-negotiation of several domestic steam contracts whose pricing took effect on January 1, 2011. Produced steam coal inventory was 1.6 million tons at September 30, 2011 compared to 2.1 million tons at September 30, 2010.

Other income attributable to the steam coal segment represents earnings from our equity affiliates that operate steam coal mines. The equity in earnings of affiliates is insignificant to the total segment activity.

Operating costs are comprised of labor, supplies, maintenance, subsidence, taxes other than income and preparation plant charges related to the extraction and sale of coal. These costs are reviewed regularly by management and are considered to be the direct responsibility of mine management. Operating costs related to the steam coal segment were $478 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $518 million in the three months ended September 30, 2010. Operating costs related to the steam coal segment have decreased primarily due to the additional steam coal sold on the high volatile metallurgical coal market.
Changes in the average operating costs per ton for steam coal sold were primarily related to the following items:

Average operating costs per steam ton sold increased due to fewer tons sold. Fixed costs are allocated over less tons, resulting in higher unit costs.
Labor and related benefits average costs per ton sold were impaired, although total dollars expensed for these items were improved slightly. Average costs per ton sold were impacted by the 1.5 million ton reduction in sales tons. Labor benefit costs were impacted by the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006 authorizing general fund revenues and expanding transfers of interest from the Abandoned Mine Land trust fund to cover orphan retirees which remain in the Combined Fund, the 1992 Benefit Plan and the 1993 Plan. The additional federal funding eliminated the 2011 funding of orphan retirees by participating active employers of the plans, resulting in lower expense in the period-to-period comparison. The additional federal funding does not impact the amount of contributions required to be paid for our assigned retirees. Also, we may be required to make additional payments in the future to these plans in the event that the federal contributions are not sufficient to cover the benefits. This improvement was offset by higher contributions made to the 1974 Pension Trust (the Trust), which is a multi-employer pension plan. Contributions to the Trust were negotiated under the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement. Contributions are based on a rate per hour worked by members of the United Mine Workers of America (UMWA). The contribution rate has increased $0.50 per hour worked in the 2011 period compared to the 2010 period. Reductions were also offset, in part, by additional employees and the impact of the wage increases of $1.50 per hour worked, $0.50 per hour worked effective January 1, 2011 under the previous collective bargaining agreement and $1.00 per hour worked effective July 1, 2011 related to the new collective bargaining agreement, in the period-to-period comparison.


50



Average operating supplies & maintenance cost per ton sold increased due to higher fuel costs, additional roof control costs, additional maintenance and equipment overhaul costs. Additional roof control costs resulted from changes in roof support strategy, such as using longer roof bolts and additional types of roof support, in order to improve the safety of our mines and to provide a more reliable source of production for our customers. Roof control costs also increased due to higher steel prices in the period-to-period comparison. Additional maintenance and equipment overhaul costs were related to additional equipment being serviced in the current period.
Production taxes average cost per ton sold increased due to the $6.16 per ton higher average sales price.
Subsidence costs per ton sold increased due to more structures and higher costs related to these structures that were impacted by longwall mining in the period-to-period comparison. Subsidence costs have also increased due to an increase in the length of streams that were impacted by longwall mining in the period-to-period comparison.
These increases in average operating costs per ton for steam coal were offset, in part, by lower contract mining fees. Fewer contractors were retained to mine our reserves in the period-to-period comparison without a corresponding reduction in total steam coal sold which has resulted in lower average unit costs per ton sold.

Provision costs are comprised of the expenses related to the Company's long-term liabilities, such as other post employment benefits (OPEB), the salary retirement plan, workers' compensation, long-term disability and accretion on mine closing and related liabilities. With the exception of accretion expense on mine closing and related liabilities, these liabilities are actuarially calculated for the Company as a whole. The expenses are then allocated to operational units based on active employee counts or active salary dollars. Accretion is calculated on a mine-by-mine basis. The average provision costs attributable to the steam coal segment were $54 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $51 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in the steam coal provision expense was attributable to the total company increased long-term liability expense as discussed in the total Company results of operations section. The 1.5 million ton reduction in sales volumes also contributed to the higher average unit costs per ton sold.

Selling, administrative and other costs attributable to the steam coal segment include selling, general and administrative expenses and direct administrative costs. Selling, general and administrative costs, excluding commission expense, are allocated to various segments based on a combination of estimated time worked by various support groups and operating costs incurred at the mine. Commission expense, which is a component of selling, is charged directly to the mine incurring the cost. Direct administrative costs are associated directly with the coal segment of the business and are allocated to various mines based on a combination of estimated time worked and production. Selling, administrative and other costs related to the steam coal segment were $43 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $35 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The cost increases attributable to the steam coal segment were attributable to higher selling, general and administrative expenses as discussed in the total Company results of operations section and higher direct administrative costs. Higher direct administrative costs were primarily due to additional support staff in the period-to-period comparison. Higher average unit costs were also related to lower volumes of coal sold. Costs were allocated over less tons, resulting in higher unit costs.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization for the steam coal segment was $75 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $70 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase was primarily due to additional equipment and infrastructure placed into service after the 2010 period that is depreciated on a straight-line basis. The increase was also due to higher units-of-production rates for steam coal mines due to additional air shafts being placed into service after the 2010 period which had higher unit rates than historical shafts put into service. These higher expenses coupled with fewer tons sold resulted in a $1.14 increase in average depreciation, depletion and amortization costs per ton sold.




51



HIGH VOL METALLURGICAL COAL SEGMENT
The high volatile metallurgical coal segment contributed $24 million to total Company earnings before income tax for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $11 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The high volatile metallurgical coal revenue and cost components on a per unit basis for these periods were as follows:
 
 
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
Percent
Change
Produced High Vol Met Tons Sold (in millions)
1.0

 
0.3

 
0.7

 
233.3
%
Average Sales Price Per High Vol Met Ton Sold
$
82.21

 
$
65.38

 
$
16.83

 
25.7
%
Average Operating Costs Per High Vol Met Ton Sold
$
45.02

 
$
30.02

 
$
15.00

 
50.0
%
Average Provision Costs Per High Vol Met Ton Sold
$
5.34

 
$
2.75

 
$
2.59

 
94.2
%
Average Selling, Administrative and Other Costs Per High Vol Met Ton Sold
$
4.39

 
$
1.94

 
$
2.45

 
126.3
%
Average Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization Costs Per High Vol Met Ton Sold
$
7.22

 
$
4.72

 
$
2.50

 
53.0
%
     Total Average Costs Per High Vol Met Ton Sold
$
61.97

 
$
39.43

 
$
22.54

 
57.2
%
     Margin Per High Vol Met Ton Sold
$
20.24

 
$
25.95

 
$
(5.71
)
 
(22.0
%)
High volatile metallurgical coal revenue was $82 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $22 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. Strength in the metallurgical coal market has continued to allow the export of Northern Appalachian coal, historically sold domestically on the steam coal market, to crossover to the Brazilian and Asian metallurgical coal markets. Average sales prices for high volatile metallurgical coal have increased due to growing the base of end user customers. CONSOL Energy sold 0.8 million tons of high volatile metallurgical coal in the export market at an average sales price of $80.65 per ton for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to 0.3 million tons at an average price of $65.38 for the three months ended September 30, 2010.
Other income attributed to the high volatile metallurgical coal segment represents earnings from our equity affiliates that operate high volatile metallurgical coal mines. The equity in earnings of affiliates is insignificant to the total segment activity.
Operating costs related to the high volatile metallurgical coal segment were $43 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $10 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. Operating costs related to the high volatile metallurgical coal segment have increased primarily due to higher volumes sold and higher average costs per ton sold.
Changes in average operating costs per ton for high volatile metallurgical coal sold were primarily related to the following items:

Average operating costs per unit primarily changed due to the mix of mines shipping high volatile metallurgical coal. The increased cost structure of high volatile metallurgical coal is due to more Central Appalachian mines shipping high vol tons. Central Appalachian mines shipping high volatile metallurgical tons have higher cost structures than the Northern Appalachian mines included in the prior period.
Labor and related benefits increased due to higher employee counts, higher non-union benefit rates and higher contributions per hour worked to the 1974 Pension Trust (Trust). Higher non-union benefit rates for active employees were related to the continued increase in healthcare costs. Higher contributions made to the Trust were discussed in the steam coal segment. These increases were offset by lower overall contributions to certain multiemployer benefit plans such as the 1992 Fund, the 1993 Fund and the Combined Fund, which were also discussed in the steam coal segment. Labor and related benefits also increased due to the impact of the wage increase of $1.50 per hour worked, $0.50 per hour worked effective January 1, 2011 under the previous collective bargaining agreement and $1.00 per hour worked effective July 1, 2011 related to the new collective bargaining agreement, in the period-to-period comparison. Increased labor and related benefit costs per unit sold were offset, in part, by additional volumes of high volatile metallurgical tons sold in the period-to-period comparison.
Average operating supplies & maintenance costs per ton sold increased due to additional maintenance and equipment overhaul costs and additional roof control costs. Additional maintenance and equipment overhaul costs were related to additional equipment being serviced in the current period. Additional roof control costs resulted from changes in roof support strategy, such as using longer roof bolts and additional types of roof support, in order to improve the safety of our mines and to provide a more reliable source of production for our customers. Roof control costs also increased


52



due to higher steel prices in the period-to-period comparison.
Production taxes average cost per ton sold increased due to the $16.83 per ton higher average sales price.
In-transit charges average cost per ton sold increased primarily due to the increased cost of moving coal from the mine to the preparation plant for processing. This increase is primarily related to the Central Appalachian mines now shipping high volatile metallurgical coal.
Subsidence costs per ton sold increased due to more structures and higher costs related to these structures that were impacted by longwall mining in the period-to-period comparison. Subsidence costs also increased due to an increase in the length of streams that were impacted by longwall mining in the period-to-period comparison.
Average preparation plant costs per ton sold increased due to additional maintenance projects completed at our preparation plants in the period-to-period comparison.
Average royalty costs per ton sold were lower in the period-to-period comparison due to fewer tons being mined from coal tracts that have a royalty, offset, in part, by higher average sales prices.

The provision expense attributable to the high volatile metallurgical coal segment was $6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in the high volatile metallurgical coal provision expense was attributable to the total Company increase in long-term liability expense discussed in the total Company results of operations section. The per unit impairment was offset, in part, by additional tons sold in the period-to-period comparison. Also, high volatile metallurgical coal accretion expense related to mine closing and related liabilities remained consistent in the period-to-period comparison which contributed to lower costs per ton sold.

Selling, administrative and other costs attributable to the high volatile metallurgical coal segment include selling, general and administrative expenses and direct administrative costs. Selling, general and administrative expenses, excluding commission expense, are allocated to various segments on a combination of estimated time worked by various support groups and operating costs incurred at the mine. Commission expense, which is a component of selling, is charged directly to the mine incurring the cost. Direct administrative costs are associated directly with the coal segment of the business and are allocated to various mines based on a combination of estimated time worked and production. Selling, administrative and other costs related to the high volatile metallurgical coal segment were $5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The cost increase attributable to the high volatile metallurgical coal segment is attributable to higher total Company selling, general and administrative expenses as discussed in the total Company results of operations section and higher direct administrative costs. Higher direct administrative costs were primarily due to additional support staff in the period-to-period comparison. These increases in expense resulted in higher costs per ton sold and were offset, in part, by additional volumes of high volatile metallurgical coal sold.
 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization for the high volatile metallurgical coal segment was $7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase was primarily due to additional equipment and infrastructure placed into service after the 2010 period that is depreciated on a straight-line basis. The increase was also due to higher units-of-production rates for high volatile metallurgical coal mines related to additional air shafts being placed into service after the 2010 period which had a higher unit rate than historical shafts put into service. These increases in unit costs per ton sold were offset, in part, by additional high volatile metallurgical tons sold which lowered the unit cost per ton impact.

The high volatile metallurgical coal segment increased the margin on our coal production that would have otherwise been sold in the domestic steam coal market.




53



LOW VOL METALLURGICAL COAL SEGMENT
The low volatile metallurgical coal segment contributed $201 million to total Company earnings before income tax for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $136 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The low volatile metallurgical coal revenue and cost components on a per ton basis for these periods are as follows:
 
 
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
Percent
Change
Produced Low Vol Met Tons Sold (in millions)
1.5

 
1.3

 
0.2

 
15.4
%
Average Sales Price Per Low Vol Met Ton Sold
$
207.21

 
$
165.22

 
$
41.99

 
25.4
%
Average Operating Costs Per Low Vol Met Ton Sold
$
54.12

 
$
47.99

 
$
6.13

 
12.8
%
Average Provision Costs Per Low Vol Met Ton Sold
$
6.69

 
$
5.29

 
$
1.40

 
26.5
%
Average Selling, Administrative and Other Costs Per Low Vol Met Ton Sold
$
5.05

 
$
3.61

 
$
1.44

 
39.9
%
Average Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization Costs Per Low Vol Met Ton Sold
$
6.28

 
$
4.65

 
$
1.63

 
35.1
%
     Total Average Costs Per Low Vol Met Ton Sold
$
72.14

 
$
61.54

 
$
10.60

 
17.2
%
     Margin Per Low Vol Met Ton Sold
$
135.07

 
$
103.68

 
$
31.39

 
30.3
%

Low volatile metallurgical coal revenue was $308 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $215 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The $93 million increase was attributable to a $41.99 per ton higher average sales price due to the continued strengthening of the low volatile metallurgical coal market, both domestic and foreign. The continued strength of these markets is related to continued worldwide demand for premium low volatile metallurgical coal. CONSOL Energy sold 1.2 million tons of low volatile metallurgical coal in the export market at an average sales price of $214.74 per ton for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to 1.0 million tons at an average price of $165.01 per ton for the three months ended September 30, 2010. Produced low volatile metallurgical coal inventory was 0.1 million tons at September 30, 2011 and 2010.
Operating costs are made up of labor, supplies, maintenance, subsidence, taxes other than income and preparation plant charges related to the extraction and sale of coal. These costs are reviewed regularly by management and are considered to be the direct responsibility of mine management. Operating costs related to the low volatile metallurgical coal segment were $81 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $61 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. Operating costs related to the low volatile metallurgical coal segment increased primarily due to higher average operating costs per ton sold and higher volumes sold.
 
  Changes in average operating costs per ton sold of low volatile metallurgical coal were primarily related to the following items:
Costs associated with the sales price of coal sold, such as royalties and production related taxes, increased due to the higher average sales prices received for low volatile metallurgical coal in the period-to-period comparison.
Average preparation plant costs per ton sold increased due to additional maintenance projects completed and increased fuel costs at our preparation plant in the period-to-period comparison.
Labor and related benefits increased in the period-to-period comparison due to additional employees, increased hours worked and increased non-union benefit rates for active employees which were related to the continued increase in healthcare costs. 
The provision expense attributable to the low volatile metallurgical coal segment was $9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in the low volatile metallurgical coal provision expense was attributable to the total Company increased long-term liability expense discussed in the total Company results of operations section. The per unit impairment was offset, in part, by additional tons sold in the period-to-period comparison. Also, low volatile metallurgical coal accretion expense related to mine closing and related liabilities remained consistent in the period-to-period comparison which contributed to lower costs per ton sold.
 
Selling, administrative and other costs attributable to the low volatile metallurgical coal segment include selling, general and administrative expenses, direct administrative costs and water treatment expenses generated from the reverse osmosis plant. Selling, general and administrative expenses, excluding commission expense and water treatment expense, are allocated to various segments on a combination of estimated time worked by various support groups and operating costs incurred at the mine. Commission expense, which is a component of selling, is charged directly to the mine incurring the cost.


54



Direct administrative costs are associated directly with the coal segment of the business and are allocated to various mines based on a combination of estimated time worked and production. Selling, administrative and other costs related to the low volatile metallurgical coal segment were $8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The cost increase attributable to the low volatile metallurgical coal segment is attributable to higher total Company selling, general and administrative expenses as discussed in the total Company results of operations section and higher direct administrative costs. Also, a reverse osmosis plant was completed and placed into service near the Buchanan Mine. Active mine water discharge is being treated by this facility and the costs of the services are charged to the mine based on gallons of water treated. Currently, the Buchanan Mine is the only facility using the plant. Construction of the plant was completed and the plant was placed into service earlier in 2011.
 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization for the low volatile metallurgical coal segment was $9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase was primarily due to additional equipment, infrastructure, and the reverse osmosis plant placed into service after the 2010 period that is depreciated on a straight-line basis. The increases in unit costs per ton sold were offset, in part, by additional low volatile metallurgical tons sold which lowered the unit cost per ton impact.

OTHER COAL SEGMENT
The other coal segment had a loss before income tax of $41 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to a loss before income tax of $97 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The other coal segment includes purchased coal activities, idle mine activities, as well as various activities assigned to the coal division but not allocated to each individual mine.
Other coal segment produced coal sales include revenue from the sale of 0.1 million tons of coal which was recovered during the reclamation process at idled facilities for the three months ended September 30, 2011. Tons sold were insignificant in the three months ended September 30, 2010. The primary focus of the activity at these locations is reclaiming disturbed land in accordance with the mining permit requirements after final mining has occurred. The tons sold are incidental to total Company production or sales.
Purchased coal sales consist of revenues from processing third-party coal in our preparation plants for blending purposes to meet customer coal specifications, coal purchased from third parties and sold directly to our customers and revenues from processing third-party coal in our preparation plants. The revenues were $5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase was primarily due to purchasing additional tons to supply a coal sales agreement.
Freight revenue is the amount billed to customers for transportation costs incurred. This revenue is based on weight of coal shipped, negotiated freight rates and method of transportation (i.e. rail, barge, truck, etc.) used by the customers to which CONSOL Energy contractually provides transportation services. Freight revenue is offset in freight expense. Freight revenue was $60 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $38 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in freight revenue was primarily due to the 0.6 million ton increase in export tons in the period-to-period comparison.
Miscellaneous other income was $24 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $16 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase of $8 million was primarily related to issuing pipeline right-of-ways to a third party which generated a gain of $10 million. This improvement was partially offset by various transactions that occurred throughout both periods, none of which were individually material.


55



Other coal segment total costs were $139 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $156 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The decrease of $17 million was due to the following items:
 
 
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
Closed and idle mine cost
 
$
23

 
$
71

 
$
(48
)
Litigation expense
 
2

 
3

 
(1
)
Freight expense
 
60

 
38

 
22

Purchased coal
 
11

 
2

 
9

Other
 
43

 
42

 
1

   Total other coal segment costs
 
$
139

 
$
156

 
$
(17
)

Closed and idle mine costs decreased approximately $48 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010. The decrease was the result of a $29 million increase in the Fola reclamation liability in the 2010 period as a result of market conditions, permitting issues, new regulatory requirements and resulting changes in mining plans. Also, closed and idle mine costs decreased $14 million as the result of the change in mine plan at Mine 84 in the 2010 period. Due to the mine plan change, a portion of the previously developed area of the mine was abandoned. Closed and idle mine costs decreased $5 million due to other changes in the operational status of various other mines, between idled and operating, throughout both periods, none of which were individually material.
Litigation expense decreased $1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010 related to various legal settlements, none of which were individually material.
Freight expense is based on weight of coal shipped, negotiated freight rates and method of transportation (i.e. rail, barge, truck, etc.) used for the customers to which CONSOL Energy contractually provides transportation services. Freight revenue is the amount billed to customers for transportation costs incurred. Freight expense is offset in freight revenue. Freight expense increased $22 million primarily due to the 0.6 million ton increase in export tons in the period-to-period comparison.
Purchased coal costs increased approximately $9 million in the period-to-period comparison primarily due to the increased volumes of coal purchased to supply various coal sales contracts.
Other expenses related to the coal segment increased $1 million in the period-to-period comparison due to various miscellaneous transactions, none of which were individually material.




56



TOTAL GAS SEGMENT ANALYSIS for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010 :
The gas segment did not significantly contribute to earnings before income tax for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to income of $35 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 .
 
 
For the Three Months Ended
 
Difference to Three Months Ended
 
September 30, 2011
 
September 30, 2010
 
CBM
 
Conven-
tional
 
Marcellus
 
Other
Gas
 
Total
Gas
 
CBM
 
Conven-
tional
 
Marcellus
 
Other
Gas
 
Total
Gas
Sales:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Produced
$
116

 
$
39

 
$
39

 
$
3

 
$
197

 
$
(24
)
 
$
(6
)
 
$
23

 
$
2

 
$
(5
)
Related Party
2

 

 

 

 
2

 
(1
)
 

 

 

 
(1
)
Total Outside Sales
118

 
39

 
39

 
3

 
199

 
(25
)
 
(6
)
 
23

 
2

 
(6
)
Gas Royalty Interest

 

 

 
17

 
17

 

 

 

 
(2
)
 
(2
)
Purchased Gas

 

 

 
1

 
1

 

 

 

 
(2
)
 
(2
)
Other Income

 

 

 
(14
)
 
(14
)
 

 

 

 
(16
)
 
(16
)
Total Revenue and Other Income
118

 
39

 
39

 
7

 
203

 
(25
)
 
(6
)
 
23

 
(18
)
 
(26
)
Lifting
13

 
17

 
6

 
1

 
37

 
(1
)
 
4

 
5

 

 
8

Gathering
25

 
8

 
3

 

 
36

 
1

 
3

 
(1
)
 
(1
)
 
2

General & Administration
15

 
8

 
4

 
1

 
28

 
(2
)
 
1

 
1

 
4

 
4

Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
26

 
15

 
15

 
2

 
58

 
(3
)
 
(8
)
 
10

 
(1
)
 
(2
)
Gas Royalty Interest

 

 

 
16

 
16

 

 

 

 
(1
)
 
(1
)
Purchased Gas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(3
)
 
(3
)
Exploration and Other Costs

 

 

 
6

 
6

 

 

 

 
(6
)
 
(6
)
Other Corporate Expenses

 

 

 
20

 
20

 

 

 

 
7

 
7

Interest Expense

 

 

 
2

 
2

 

 

 

 

 

Total Cost
79

 
48

 
28

 
48

 
203

 
(5
)
 

 
15

 
(1
)
 
9

Earnings Before Noncontrolling Interest and Income Tax
39

 
(9
)
 
11

 
(41
)
 

 
(20
)
 
(6
)
 
8

 
(17
)
 
(35
)
Noncontrolling Interest

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings Before Income Tax
$
39

 
$
(9
)
 
$
11

 
$
(41
)
 
$

 
$
(20
)
 
$
(6
)
 
$
8

 
$
(17
)
 
$
(35
)




57



COALBED METHANE (CBM) GAS SEGMENT
The CBM segment contributed $39 million to the total Company earnings before income tax for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $59 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 .
 
 
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
Percent
Change
Produced gas CBM sales volumes (in billion cubic feet)
23.3

 
23.0

 
0.3

 
1.3
 %
Average CBM sales price per thousand cubic feet sold
$
5.04

 
$
6.16

 
$
(1.12
)
 
(18.2
)%
Average CBM lifting costs per thousand cubic feet sold
$
0.54

 
$
0.59

 
$
(0.05
)
 
(8.5
)%
Average CBM gathering costs per thousand cubic feet sold
$
1.06

 
$
1.06

 
$

 
 %
Average CBM general & administrative costs per thousand cubic feet sold
$
0.66

 
$
0.70

 
$
(0.04
)
 
(5.7
)%
Average CBM depreciation, depletion and amortization costs per thousand cubic feet sold
$
1.10

 
$
1.23

 
$
(0.13
)
 
(10.6
)%
   Total Average CBM costs per thousand cubic feet sold
$
3.36

 
$
3.58

 
$
(0.22
)
 
(6.1
)%
   Average Margin for CBM
$
1.68

 
$
2.58

 
$
(0.90
)
 
(34.9
)%


CBM sales revenues were $118 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $143 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 . The $25 million decrease was primarily due to a 18.2% decrease in average sales price per thousand cubic feet sold, offset, in part, by a 1.3% increase in average volumes sold. The decrease in CBM average sales price is the result of various gas swap transactions maturing in each period. The gas swap transactions qualify as financial cash flow hedges that exist parallel to the underlying physical transactions. These financial hedges represented approximately 16.6 billion cubic feet of our produced CBM gas sales volumes for the three months ended September 30, 2011 at an average price of $5.27 per thousand cubic feet. In the three months ended September 30, 2010, these financial hedges represented 13.1 billion cubic feet at an average price of $7.47 per thousand cubic feet. CBM sales volumes increased 0.3 billion cubic feet primarily due to additional wells coming on-line from our on-going drilling program.
Total costs for the CBM segment were $79 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $84 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 . Lower costs in the period-to-period comparison were primarily related to lower unit costs offset, in part, by increased volumes sold.
 
CBM lifting costs were $13 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $14 million in the three months ended September 30, 2010 . Lower average CBM lifting unit costs were related to reduced idle rig costs due to a contract buyout and reduced contract services primarily due to lower electrical contract labor. These improvements were partially offset by increased road and equipment maintenance costs.
CBM gathering costs were $25 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $24 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 . The $1 million increase was due to various activities that occurred throughout both periods, none of which were individually material.
General and administrative costs attributable to the total gas division were $28 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $24 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 . The $4 million increase was attributable to additional corporate service charges from CONSOL Energy and additional staffing. The corporate service charge allocations are primarily based on revenue and capital expenditure projections between coal and gas as a percent of total. The additional staffing was primarily due to additional support staffing requirements.
General and administrative costs for the CBM segment were $15 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $17 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 . General and administrative costs attributable to the total gas segment are allocated to the individual gas segments based on a combination of production and employee counts. Unit costs were reduced in the period-to-period comparison primarily due to CBM being a lower percentage of total gas volumes primarily due to increased Marcellus volumes.


58



Depreciation, depletion and amortization attributable to the CBM segment was $26 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $29 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. There was approximately $18 million, or $0.77 per unit-of-production, of depreciation, depletion and amortization related to CBM gas and related well equipment that was reflected on a units-of-production method of depreciation for the three months ended September 30, 2011. The production portion of depreciation, depletion and amortization was $22 million, or $0.95 per unit-of-production for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The CBM unit-of-production rate decreased due to revised rates which are generally calculated using the net book value of assets divided by either proved or proved developed reserve additions. There was approximately $8 million, or $0.33 average per unit cost of depreciation, depletion and amortization related to gathering and other equipment that is reflected on a straight line basis in the three months ended September 30, 2011. The non-production related depreciation, depletion and amortization was $7 million, or $0.28 per thousand cubic feet for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase was related to additional gathering assets placed in service after the 2010 period.

CONVENTIONAL GAS SEGMENT
The conventional segment had a loss before income tax of $9 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to a loss before income tax of $3 million in the three months ended September 30, 2010.
 
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
Percent
Change
Produced gas Conventional sales volumes (in billion cubic feet)
7.8

 
9.1

 
(1.3
)
 
(14.3
)%
Average Conventional sales price per thousand cubic feet sold
$
4.98

 
$
5.00

 
$
(0.02
)
 
(0.4
)%
Average Conventional lifting costs per thousand cubic feet sold
$
2.19

 
$
1.37

 
$
0.82

 
59.9
 %
Average Conventional gathering costs per thousand cubic feet sold
$
1.00

 
$
0.60

 
$
0.40

 
66.7
 %
Average Conventional general & administrative costs per thousand cubic feet sold
$
0.93

 
$
0.80

 
$
0.13

 
16.3
 %
Average Conventional depreciation, depletion and amortization costs per thousand cubic feet sold
$
1.96

 
$
2.49

 
$
(0.53
)
 
(21.3
)%
   Total Average Conventional costs per thousand cubic feet sold
$
6.08

 
$
5.26

 
$
0.82

 
15.6
 %
   Average Margin for Conventional
$
(1.10
)
 
$
(0.26
)
 
$
(0.84
)
 
323.1
 %

Conventional sales revenues were $39 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $45 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The $6 million decrease was primarily due to the 14.3% decrease in volumes sold. Conventional sales volumes decreased 1.3 billion cubic feet for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the 2010 period primarily due to normal well declines without a corresponding increase in wells drilled, as the focus of the gas division is to develop the Marcellus acreage. Average sales price decreased primarily due to lower general market prices of natural gas and oil in the period-to-period comparison. This decrease was partially offset by the result of various gas swap transactions that matured in the three months ended September 30, 2011. These gas swap transactions qualify as financial cash flow hedges that exist parallel to the underlying physical transactions. These financial hedges represented approximately 3.9 billion cubic feet of our produced conventional gas sales volumes for the three months ended September 30, 2011 at an average price of $4.94 per thousand cubic feet. There were no conventional gas swap transactions that occurred in the three months ended September 30, 2010.
Total costs for the conventional segment were $48 million for both the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. When combined with the decrease in volumes sold, this resulted in an increase in total average conventional costs per thousand cubic feet sold.
Conventional lifting costs were $17 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $13 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. Lifting costs per unit increased due to increased road maintenance costs, increased well tending charges, as a result of additional wells turned in line, increased slip repairs on various well pads, increased non-operated well costs and increased in swabbing charges to mitigate production issues.
Conventional gathering costs were $8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. Gathering costs per unit increased primarily due to increased third party transportation costs and increased pipeline maintenance charges.


59



General and administrative costs related to the Conventional gas segment were $8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. General and administrative costs attributable to the total gas segment are allocated to the individual gas segments based on a combination of production and employee counts. The total general and administrative costs increases which were discussed in the CBM segment, combined with the decreased volumes sold contributed to the increased general and administrative costs allocated to the conventional gas segment.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization costs were $15 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $23 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. There was approximately $14 million, or $1.74 per unit-of production, of depreciation, depletion and amortization related to conventional gas and related well equipment that was reflected on a units-of-production method of depreciation for the three months ended September 30, 2011. There was approximately $21 million, or $2.28 per unit-of-production, of depreciation, depletion and amortization related to conventional gas and related well equipment that was reflected on a units-of-production method of depreciation for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The rate is calculated by taking the net book value of the related assets divided by either proved or proved developed reserves, generally at the previous year end. The decrease in the unit-of-production rate is primarily the result of various acquisition adjustments that were reflected after the 2010 period. There was approximately $1 million, or $0.22 per thousand cubic feet, of depreciation, depletion and amortization related to gathering and other equipment that is reflected on a straight-line basis for the three months ended September 30, 2011. There was $2 million, or $0.21 per thousand cubic feet, of depreciation, depletion and amortization related to gathering and other equipment that is reflected on a straight-line basis for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The decrease is related to various acquisition adjustments and additional infrastructure and equipment placed in service after the 2010 period.

MARCELLUS GAS SEGMENT
The Marcellus segment contributed $11 million to the total Company earnings before income tax for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010.

 
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
Percent
Change
Produced gas Marcellus sales volumes (in billion cubic feet)
8.7

 
3.3

 
5.4

 
163.6
 %
Average Marcellus sales price per thousand cubic feet sold
$
4.48

 
$
4.66

 
$
(0.18
)
 
(3.9
)%
Average Marcellus lifting costs per thousand cubic feet sold
$
0.70

 
$
0.41

 
$
0.29

 
70.7
 %
Average Marcellus gathering costs per thousand cubic feet sold
$
0.29

 
$
1.03

 
$
(0.74
)
 
(71.8
)%
Average Marcellus general & administrative costs per thousand cubic feet sold
$
0.53

 
$
0.73

 
$
(0.20
)
 
(27.4
)%
Average Marcellus depreciation, depletion and amortization costs per thousand cubic feet sold
$
1.73

 
$
1.71

 
$
0.02

 
1.2
 %
   Total Average Marcellus costs per thousand cubic feet sold
$
3.25

 
$
3.88

 
$
(0.63
)
 
(16.2
)%
   Average Margin for Marcellus
$
1.23

 
$
0.78

 
$
0.45

 
57.7
 %

The Marcellus segment sales revenues were $39 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $16 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The decrease in Marcellus average sales price was the result of lower general market prices combined with various gas swap transactions that matured in the three months ended September 30, 2011. These gas swap transactions qualify as financial cash flow hedges that exist parallel to the underlying physical transactions. These financial hedges represented approximately 3.4 billion cubic feet of our produced Marcellus gas sales volumes for the three months ended September 30, 2011 at an average price of $4.61 per thousand cubic feet. These financial hedges represented 0.4 billion cubic feet of our produced Marcellus gas sales volumes for the three months ended September 30, 2010 at an average price of $5.05 per thousand cubic feet. The increased sales volumes are primarily due to additional wells coming on-line from our on-going drilling program. At September 30, 2011, there were 89 Marcellus Shale wells in production. At September 30, 2010, there were 45 Marcellus Shale wells in production.


60



Marcellus lifting costs were $6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. Lifting costs per unit increased $0.29 per thousand cubic feet sold due to increased fishing services and mechanical scale removal services completed to improve well performance, increased activity on non-operated wells and additional well tending costs as a result of the increased number of wells and an escalation in rates. These increases were partially offset by lower repairs and maintenance costs primarily due to the increased sales volumes.
Marcellus gathering costs were $3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. Average gathering costs decreased $0.74 per unit primarily due to the 5.4 billion cubic feet of additional volumes sold.
General and administrative costs on the Marcellus gas segment were $4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. General and administrative costs attributable to the total gas division are allocated to the individual gas segments based on a combination of production and employee counts. The total general and administrative costs increases which were discussed in the CBM segment combined with higher volumes of Marcellus gas sold contributed to the increase. General and administrative costs were $0.53 per thousand cubic feet sold for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $0.73 per thousand cubic feet sold for the three months ended September 30, 2010.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization costs were $15 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. There was approximately $10 million, or $1.13 per unit-of-production, of depreciation, depletion and amortization related to Marcellus gas and related well equipment that was reflected on a units-of-production method of depreciation for the three months ended September 30, 2011. There was approximately $5 million, or $1.50 per unit-of-production, of depreciation, depletion and amortization related to Marcellus gas and related well equipment that was reflected on a units-of-production method of depreciation for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The rate is calculated by taking the net book value of the related assets divided by either proved or proved developed reserves, generally at the previous year end. There was approximately $5 million, or $0.60 per thousand cubic feet, of depreciation, depletion and amortization related to gathering and other equipment that was reflected on a straight line basis in the three months ended September 30, 2011. There was less than $1 million, or $0.21 per thousand cubic feet, of depreciation, depletion and amortization related to gathering and other equipment that was reflected on a straight line basis in the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase is related to additional infrastructure and equipment placed in service after the 2010 period.

OTHER GAS SEGMENT
The other gas segment includes activity not assigned to the CBM, conventional or Marcellus gas segments. This segment includes purchased gas activity, gas royalty interest activity, exploration and other costs, other corporate expenses, and miscellaneous operational activity not assigned to a specific gas segment.
Other gas sales volumes are primarily related to production from the Chattanooga Shale in Tennessee. Revenue from this operation was approximately $3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and $1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. Total costs related to these other sales were $4 million in the 2011 period and were $2 million in the 2010 period. The increase in costs in the period-to-period comparison was primarily attributable to additional general and administrative costs, which are discussed in the CBM segment. A per unit analysis of the other operating costs in the Chattanooga shale is not meaningful due to the low volumes produced in the period-to-period analysis.
Royalty interest gas sales represent the revenues related to the portion of production belonging to royalty interest owners sold by the CONSOL Energy gas segment. Royalty interest gas sales revenue was $17 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $19 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The changes in market prices, contractual differences among leases, and the mix of average and index prices used in calculating royalties contributed to the period-to-period change.
 
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
Percent
Change
Gas Royalty Interest Sales Volumes (in billion cubic feet)
3.9

 
4.1

 
(0.2
)
 
(4.9
)%
Average Sales Price Per thousand cubic feet
$
4.34

 
$
4.43

 
$
(0.09
)
 
(2.0
)%



61



Purchased gas sales volumes represent volumes of gas we sold at market prices that were purchased from third-party producers. Purchased gas sales revenues were $1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010.
 
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
Percent
Change
Purchased Gas Sales Volumes (in billion cubic feet)
0.3

 
0.6

 
(0.3
)
 
(50.0
)%
Average Sales Price Per thousand cubic feet
$
4.43

 
$
5.54

 
$
(1.11
)
 
(20.0
)%

Other income was a loss of $14 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to income of $2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The decrease was primarily due to the loss on the Noble transaction of $58 million. This loss was partially offset by a gain on the sale of the Antero overriding royalty interest of $41 million and $1 million due to various transactions that occurred throughout both periods, none of which were individually material.
Royalty interest gas costs represent the costs related to the portion of production belonging to royalty interest owners sold by the CONSOL Energy gas segment. Royalty interest gas costs were $16 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $17 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The changes in market prices, contractual differences among leases, and the mix of average and index prices used in calculating royalties contributed to the period-to-period change.
 
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
Percent
Change
Gas Royalty Interest Sales Volumes (in billion cubic feet)
3.9

 
4.1

 
(0.2
)
 
(4.9
)%
Average Cost Per thousand cubic feet sold
$
3.92

 
$
4.01

 
$
(0.09
)
 
(2.2
)%

Purchased gas volumes represent volumes of gas purchased from third-party producers that we sell. Purchased gas volumes also reflect the impact of pipeline imbalances. The lower average cost per thousand cubic feet is due to overall price changes and contractual differences among customers in the period-to-period comparison. Purchased gas costs were less than $1 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 and $3 million in the three months ended September 30, 2010.
 
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
Percent
Change
Purchased Gas Volumes (in billion cubic feet)
0.2

 
0.6

 
(0.4
)
 
(66.7
)%
Average Cost Per thousand cubic feet sold
$
1.62

 
$
5.49

 
$
(3.87
)
 
(70.5
)%
Exploration and other costs were $6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $12 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The $6 million decrease is primarily related to increased lease surrenders and additional dry wells in the 2010 period. Costs included in the exploration and other cost line are detailed as follows:
 
 
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
Percent
Change
Dry Hole and Lease Expiration Costs
$
6

 
$
12

 
$
(6
)
 
(50.0
)%
Exploration

 

 

 
 %
Total Exploration and Other Costs
$
6

 
$
12

 
$
(6
)
 
(50.0
)%



62



Other corporate expenses were $20 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $13 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The $7 million increase in the period-to-period comparison was made up of the following items:  
 
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
Percent
Change
Short-term incentive compensation
$
6

 
$
2

 
$
4

 
200.0
 %
Unutilized firm transportation
5

 
1

 
4

 
400.0
 %
Contract buyout
3

 

 
3

 
100.0
 %
Stock-based compensation
4

 
4

 

 
 %
Other
2

 
6

 
(4
)
 
(66.7
)%
Total Other Corporate Expenses
$
20

 
$
13

 
$
7

 
53.8
 %

The short-term incentive compensation program is designed to increase compensation to eligible employees when CNX Gas reaches predetermined targets for safety, production and unit costs. Short-term incentive compensation increased in the period-to-period comparison as the result of exceeding the targets in the 2011 period and an increased allocation of expense from CONSOL Energy as the result of exceeding corporate targets.

Unutilized firm transportation represents excess pipeline transportation capacity that the gas division obtained to enable gas production to flow on an uninterrupted basis as the gas operations continue to increase sales volumes.

Contract buyout represents the cancellation of a drilling arrangement with a third-party well driller.

Stock-based compensation expense remained consistent in the period-to-period comparison.

Other corporate related expense decreased $4 million in the period-to-period comparison due to various transactions that occurred throughout both periods, none of which were individually material.

Interest expense related to the other gas segment remained consistent at $2 million for both the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. Interest was incurred by the other gas segment on the CNX Gas revolving credit facility, a capital lease and debt held by a variable interest entity.

Noncontrolling interest represents 100% of the earnings impact of a third party which has been determined to be a variable interest entity, in which CONSOL Energy holds no ownership interest, but is the primary beneficiary. The CONSOL Energy gas division has been determined to be the primary beneficiary due to guarantees of the third party's bank debt related to their purchase of drilling rigs. The third-party entity provides drilling services primarily to the CONSOL Energy gas division. CONSOL Energy consolidates the entity and then reflects 100% of the impact as noncontrolling interest. The consolidation does not significantly impact any amounts reflected in the gas division income statement. The variance in the noncontrolling amounts reflects the third party's variance in earnings in the period-to-period comparison. In the three months ended September 30, 2011, the drilling services contract was bought out. Subsequent to this transaction, the non-controlling interest was de-consolidated.




63



OTHER SEGMENT ANALYSIS for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010 :
The other segment includes activity from the sales of industrial supplies, the transportation operations and various other corporate activities that are not allocated to the coal or gas segment. The other segment had a loss before income tax of $68 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to a loss before income tax of $63 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 . The other segment also included total company income tax expense of $33 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $16 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 .
 
 
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
Percent
Change
Sales—Outside
$
88

 
$
75

 
$
13

 
17.3
 %
Other Income
7

 
5

 
2

 
40.0
 %
Total Revenue
95

 
80

 
15

 
18.8
 %
Cost of Goods Sold and Other Charges
98

 
72

 
26

 
36.1
 %
Depreciation, Depletion & Amortization
5

 
4

 
1

 
25.0
 %
Taxes Other Than Income Tax
3

 
3

 

 
 %
Interest Expense
57

 
64

 
(7
)
 
(10.9
)%
Total Costs
163

 
143

 
20

 
14.0
 %
Loss Before Income Tax
(68
)
 
(63
)
 
(5
)
 
(7.9
)%
Income Tax
33

 
16

 
17

 
106.3
 %
Net Loss
$
(101
)
 
$
(79
)
 
$
(22
)
 
(27.8
)%

Industrial supplies:
Total revenue from industrial supplies was $63 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $48 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 . The increase was primarily related to higher sales volumes.
Total costs related to industrial supply sales were $59 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $46 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 . The increase of $13 million was primarily related to higher sales volumes.
Transportation operations:
Total revenue from transportation operations was $29 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $30 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 . The decrease of $1 million was primarily attributable to less through-put tons at the Baltimore terminal in the period-to-period comparison.
Total costs related to the transportation operations were $22 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $21 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 . The increase of $1 million was primarily related to repairs and maintenance costs to maintain the Baltimore terminal facilities, none of which were individually material.
Miscellaneous other:
Additional other income of $3 million was recognized for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 . The $1 million decrease was primarily due to lower equity in earnings of affiliates in the current period compared to the prior year period and various transactions that occurred throughout both periods, none of which were individually material.


64



Other corporate costs in the other segment include interest expense, acquisition and financing costs and various other miscellaneous corporate charges. Total other costs were $82 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $76 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 . Other corporate costs increased due to the following items:
 
 
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
Transaction and financing fees
 
$
15

 
$

 
$
15

Interest expense
 
57

 
64

 
(7
)
Bank fees
 
6

 
7

 
(1
)
Evaluation fees for non-core asset dispositions
 
2

 
2

 

Other
 
2

 
3

 
(1
)
 
 
$
82

 
$
76

 
$
6

Transaction and financing fees of $15 million incurred in the three months ended September 30, 2011 related to the solicitation of consents of the long-term bonds needed in order to clarify the indentures that relate to joint arrangements with respect to CONSOL Energy's oil and gas properties.
Interest expense decreased $7 million in the period-to-period comparison primarily due to uncertain tax position adjustments related to the closure of federal income tax audits and lower borrowings on the revolving credit facility.
Bank fees decreased $1 million due to less borrowings on the revolving credit facility in the period-to-period comparison.
Evaluation fees for non-core asset dispositions remained consistent in the period-to-period comparison.
Other corporate items decreased $1 million due to various transactions that occurred throughout both periods, none of which were individually material.


Income Taxes:
The effective income tax rate was 16.5% in the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to 17.3% in the three months ended September 30, 2010 . The effective income tax rate was impacted by several discrete transactions that occurred in both the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. The discrete items in 2011 included the results from the 2006 and 2007 Internal Revenue Service Revenue Agent's Report and related impacts on the 2010 accrual. The adjustments were primarily due to capital versus expense items and the related percentage depletion impacts. The relationship between pre-tax earnings and percentage depletion also impacts the effective tax rate. See Note 5—Income Taxes of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for additional information. 
 
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
Percent
Change
Total Company Earnings Before Income Tax
$
200

 
$
91

 
$
109

 
119.8
%
Income Tax Expense
$
33

 
$
16

 
$
17

 
106.3
%
Effective Income Tax Rate
16.5
%
 
17.3
%
 
(0.8
)%
 
 



65



Results of Operations
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 Compared with Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010


Net Income Attributable to CONSOL Energy Shareholders
CONSOL Energy reported net income attributable to CONSOL Energy shareholders of $437 million, or $1.91 per diluted share, for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 . Net income attributable to CONSOL Energy shareholders was $242 million, or $1.13 per diluted share, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 .
The coal division includes steam coal, high volatile metallurgical coal, low volatile metallurgical coal and other coal. The total coal division contributed $719 million of earnings before income tax for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $349 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 . The total coal division sold 47.5 million tons of coal produced from CONSOL Energy mines, excluding our portion of tons sold from equity affiliates, for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to 46.2 million tons for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 .
The average sales price and average costs per ton for all active coal operations were as follows:
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
Percent
Change
Average Sales Price per ton sold
$
72.48

 
$
61.42

 
$
11.06

 
18.0
%
Average Costs per ton sold
51.39

 
47.44

 
3.95

 
8.3
%
Margin
$
21.09

 
$
13.98

 
$
7.11

 
50.9
%
The higher average sales price per ton sold reflects successful re-negotiation of several domestic steam contracts whose pricing took effect January 1, 2011, another strong quarter of high volatile metallurgical coal sales and continued demand for our premium low volatile metallurgical coal. Also, 8.6 million tons were sold on the export market at an average sales price of $124.54 per ton for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to 5.9 million tons at an average price of $97.46 per ton for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

Average costs per ton sold increased in the period-to-period comparison due primarily to the following:
Depreciation, depletion and amortization increased due to additional assets placed into service after the 2010 period,
Operating supplies and maintenance costs per ton sold were higher due to additional roof control costs, additional maintenance costs and equipment overhaul costs,
Higher costs associated with the increased sales price of coal sold, such as royalties and production related taxes,
Increased actuarial expenses related to other post employment benefits and pension related to employees retiring sooner than originally anticipated and average claim costs being higher than originally anticipated, and
Increased labor and labor related charges as a result of additional employees, increased overtime hours worked and the impact of the $1.50 per hour worked UMWA contract wage increases, $0.50 per hour worked related to the prior UMWA contract and $1.00 per hour worked related to the new UMWA contract.

The total gas division includes coalbed methane (CBM), conventional, Marcellus and other gas. The total gas division contributed $53 million of earnings before income tax for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $163 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 . Total gas production was 113.8 billion cubic feet for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to 91.7 billion cubic feet for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 .
The average sales price and average costs for all active gas operations were as follows: 
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
Percent
Change
Average Sales Price per thousand cubic feet sold
$
4.97

 
$
6.22

 
$
(1.25
)
 
(20.1
)%
Average Costs per thousand cubic feet sold
3.86

 
3.88

 
(0.02
)
 
(0.5
)%
Margin
$
1.11

 
$
2.34

 
$
(1.23
)
 
(52.6
)%



66



Total gas division outside sales revenues were $566 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $571 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 . The decrease was primarily due to the 20.1% reduction in average price per thousand cubic feet sold partially offset by the 24.1% increase in volumes sold. The decrease in average sales price is the result of various gas swap transactions that occurred throughout both periods and lower average market prices. The gas swap transactions qualify as financial cash flow hedges that exist parallel to the underlying physical transactions. These financial hedges represented approximately 60.1 billion cubic feet of our produced gas sales volumes for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 at an average price of $5.23 per thousand cubic feet. These financial hedges represented 40.1 billion cubic feet of our produced gas sales volumes for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 at an average price of $8.09 per thousand cubic feet.
Total gas unit costs decreased slightly for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010 primarily due to lower depreciation, depletion and amortization and lower gathering costs partially offset by increased lifting costs. The wells purchased in the Dominion Acquisition, which closed on April 30, 2011, increased total operating costs by $0.43 per thousand cubic feet due to higher costs and lower volumes produced related to the age of these wells compared to the legacy CONSOL Energy wells. Excluding the impact of these purchased wells, unit costs improved $0.45 per thousand cubic feet primarily due to the additional volumes produced, improved depreciation, depletion and amortization and lower gathering charges. Volumes increased in the period-to-period comparison due to the on-going drilling program and the additional volumes from the wells purchased in the Dominion Acquisition, which occurred on April 30, 2010. Lower depreciation, depletion and amortization rates were the result of additional gas reserves recognized at December 31, 2010. Gathering and compression charges were improved primarily due to unutilized firm transportation charges now being reflected in other corporate expenses. Lifting costs increased in the period-to-period comparison due to additional well services related to the increased number of wells and escalation in rates.
The other segment includes industrial supplies activity, terminal, river and dock service activity, income taxes and other business activities not assigned to the coal or gas segment.
Included in both coal and gas unit costs are Selling, General and Administrative Expenses and total Company long-term liabilities, such as other post employment benefits (OPEB), the salary retirement plan, workers' compensation and long-term disability. A detailed analysis of these total Company expenses are as follows:
Total Company Selling, General and Administrative Expenses are allocated to various segments primarily based on revenue and capital expenditure projections between coal and gas as a percent of total. Total Company Selling, General and Administrative Expenses were made up of the following items:
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
Percent
Change
Employee wages and related expenses
$
60

 
$
52

 
$
8

 
15.4
%
Advertising and promotion
7

 
2

 
5

 
250.0
%
Contributions
5

 
3

 
2

 
66.7
%
Commissions
11

 
10

 
1

 
10.0
%
Consulting and professional services
20

 
19

 
1

 
5.3
%
Miscellaneous
27

 
22

 
5

 
22.7
%
Total Company Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
$
130

 
$
108

 
$
22

 
20.4
%

Total Company selling, general and administrative expenses increased due to the following:
Employee wages and related expenses increased $8 million which was primarily attributable to the support staff retained in the Dominion Acquisition and additional hiring of support staff in the period-to-period comparison.
Advertising and promotion expense increased $5 million in the period-to-period comparison due to additional campaigns initiated in the 2011 period.
Contributions expense increased $2 million due to various transactions that occurred throughout both periods, none of which were individually material.
Commission expense increased $1 million due to the increase in average sales price and additional tons sold for which a third party was owed a commission in the period-to-period comparison.
Consulting and professional services increased $1 million due to various transactions that occurred throughout both


67



periods, none of which were individually material.
Miscellaneous selling, general and administrative expenses increased $5 million due to various transactions that occurred throughout both periods, none of which were individually material.
Total Company long-term liabilities, such as other post employment benefits (OPEB), the salary retirement plan, workers' compensation and long-term disability are actuarially calculated for the Company as a whole. The expenses are then allocated to operational units based on active employee counts or active salary dollars. Total CONSOL Energy expense related to our actuarial calculated liabilities was $249 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $216 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase of $33 million was due primarily to OPEB and salary pension expense. The additional OPEB and salary pension expense related to employees retiring sooner than originally anticipated and average claim costs being higher than originally anticipated. Also, higher provision expenses in the period-to-period comparison were due to changes in the discount rates used at the measurement date, which is December 31. See Note 3—Components of Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans Net Periodic Benefit Costs and Note 4—Components of Coal Workers' Pneumoconiosis (CWP) and Workers' Compensation Net Periodic Benefit Costs in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for additional detail of total Company expense increases.

TOTAL COAL SEGMENT ANALYSIS for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010 :
The coal segment contributed $719 million of earnings before income tax in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $349 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 . Variances by the individual coal segments are discussed below.

 
For the Nine Months Ended
 
Difference to Nine Months Ended
 
September 30, 2011
 
September 30, 2010
 
Steam
Coal
 
High
Vol
Met
Coal
 
Low
Vol
Met
Coal
 
Other
Coal
 
Total
Coal
 
Steam
Coal
 
High
Vol
Met
Coal
 
Low
Vol
Met
Coal
 
Other
Coal
 
Total
Coal
Sales:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Produced Coal
$
2,315

 
$
278

 
$
824

 
$
23

 
$
3,440

 
$
112

 
$
143

 
$
333

 
$
16

 
$
604

Purchased Coal

 

 

 
38

 
38

 

 

 

 
12

 
12

Total Outside Sales
2,315

 
278

 
824

 
61

 
3,478

 
112

 
143

 
333

 
28

 
616

Freight Revenue

 

 

 
156

 
156

 

 

 

 
59

 
59

Other Income
5

 
9

 

 
52

 
66

 

 
3

 

 
11

 
14

Total Revenue and Other Income
2,320

 
287

 
824

 
269

 
3,700

 
112

 
146

 
333

 
98

 
689

Costs and Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total operating costs
1,429

 
126

 
223

 
170

 
1,948

 
(8
)
 
73

 
50

 
10

 
125

Total provisions
165

 
15

 
28

 
44

 
252

 
16

 
9

 
8

 
(69
)
 
(36
)
Total administrative & other costs
127

 
13

 
21

 
63

 
224

 
19

 
9

 
7

 
(6
)
 
29

Depreciation, depletion and amortization
226

 
22

 
27

 
126

 
401

 
28

 
14

 
12

 
88

 
142

Total Costs and Expenses
1,947

 
176

 
299

 
403

 
2,825

 
55

 
105

 
77

 
23

 
260

Freight Expense

 

 

 
156

 
156

 

 

 

 
59

 
59

Total Costs
1,947

 
176

 
299

 
559

 
2,981

 
55

 
105

 
77

 
82

 
319

Earnings (Loss) Before Income Taxes
$
373

 
$
111

 
$
525

 
$
(290
)
 
$
719

 
$
57

 
$
41

 
$
256

 
$
16

 
$
370





68



STEAM COAL SEGMENT
The steam coal segment contributed $373 million to total Company earnings before income tax for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $316 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 . The steam coal revenue and cost components on a per unit basis for these periods are as follows:
 
For the Nine Months Ended June 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
Percent
Change
Produced Steam Tons Sold (in millions)
39.3

 
40.7

 
(1.4
)
 
(3.4
)%
Average Sales Price Per Steam Ton Sold
$
58.88

 
$
54.09

 
$
4.79

 
8.9
 %
Average Operating Costs Per Steam Ton Sold
$
36.33

 
$
35.29

 
$
1.04

 
2.9
 %
Average Provision Costs Per Steam Ton Sold
$
4.21

 
$
3.66

 
$
0.55

 
15.0
 %
Average Selling, Administrative and Other Costs Per Steam Ton Sold
$
3.23

 
$
2.65

 
$
0.58

 
21.9
 %
Average Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization Costs Per Steam Ton Sold
$
5.76

 
$
4.85

 
$
0.91

 
18.8
 %
     Total Average Costs Per Steam Ton Sold
$
49.53

 
$
46.45

 
$
3.08

 
6.6
 %
     Margin Per Steam Ton Sold
$
9.35

 
$
7.64

 
$
1.71

 
22.4
 %

Steam coal revenue was $2,315 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $2,203 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The $112 million increase was attributable to a $4.79 per ton higher average sales price partially offset by 1.4 million fewer tons sold. The higher average steam coal sales price in the 2011 period was the result of successful re-negotiation of several domestic steam contracts whose pricing took effect on January 1, 2011. Also, 1.8 million tons of steam coal was sold on the export market at an average sales price of $68.15 per ton for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to 1.5 million tons at an average price of $55.31 per ton for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The steam coal segment was also impacted by 3.5 million tons of steam coal sold on the high volatile metallurgical coal market for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, which increased 1.7 million tons compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

Other income attributable to the steam coal segment represents earnings from our equity affiliates that operate steam coal mines. The equity in earnings of affiliates is insignificant to the total segment activity.
Operating costs are comprised of labor, supplies, maintenance, subsidence, taxes other than income and preparation plant charges related to the extraction and sale of coal. These costs are reviewed regularly by management and are considered to be the direct responsibility of mine management. Operating costs related to the steam coal segment were $1,429 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $1,437 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Operating costs related to the steam coal segment decreased primarily due to higher average costs per ton sold partially offset by lower volumes sold.
Changes in the average operating costs per ton for steam coal sold were primarily related to the following items:

Average operating supplies & maintenance costs per ton sold increased due to additional maintenance and equipment overhaul costs and additional roof control costs. Additional maintenance and equipment overhaul costs are related to additional equipment being serviced in the current period. Additional roof control costs resulted from changes in roof support strategy, such as using longer roof bolts and additional types of roof support, in order to improve the safety of our mines and to provide a more reliable source of production for our customers.
Average preparation costs per ton sold increased due to additional maintenance projects completed at our preparation plants in the period-to-period comparison.
Labor and related benefits were impaired on a cost per ton sold basis due to higher costs and lower volumes sold. Higher benefit costs were due primarily to contributions made to the 1974 Pension Trust (the Trust), which is a multiemployer pension plan. Contributions to the Trust were negotiated under the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement. Contributions are based on a rate per hour worked by members of the United Mine Workers of America (UMWA). The contribution rate increased $0.50 per hour worked in the 2011 period compared to the 2010 period. Additional employees in the period-to-period comparison also contributed to higher labor costs. Non-union benefit rates for active employees also increased as a result of continued increases in healthcare costs. Labor and related benefits also increased due to additional employees and the impact of the wage increases of $1.50 per hour worked, $0.50 per hour worked effective January 1, 2011 under the previous collective bargaining agreement and $1.00 per hour worked effective July 1, 2011 related to the new collective bargaining agreement, in the period-to-period comparison. These increases were offset, in part, as a result of the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006 authorizing


69



general fund revenues and expanding transfers of interest from the Abandoned Mine Land trust fund to cover orphan retirees which remain in the Combined Fund, the 1992 Benefit Plan and the 1993 Plan. The additional federal funding eliminated the 2011 funding of orphan retirees by participating active employers of the plans, resulting in lower expense in the period-to-period comparison. The additional federal funding does not impact the amount of contributions required to be paid for our assigned retirees. Also, we may be required to make additional payments in the future to these plans in the event the federal contributions are not sufficient to cover the benefits.
Production taxes average cost per ton sold increased primarily due to the $4.79 per ton higher average sales price.
Average operating costs per steam ton sold increased due to lower tons sold as fixed costs were allocated over less tons; therefore, unit cost increased.
Provision costs are made up of the expenses related to the Company's long-term liabilities, such as other post employment benefits (OPEB), the salary retirement plan, workers' compensation, long-term disability and accretion on mine closing and related liabilities. With the exception of accretion expense on mine closing and related liabilities, these liabilities are actuarially calculated for the Company as a whole. The expenses are then allocated to operational units based on active employee counts or active salary dollars. Accretion is calculated on a mine-by-mine basis. Provision costs attributable to the steam coal segment were $165 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $149 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increased steam coal provision expense was attributable to the total Company increase in long-term liability expense discussed in the total Company results of operations section. Steam coal accretion expense related to mine closing and related liabilities remained consistent in the period-to-period comparison.

Selling, administrative and other costs attributable to the steam coal segment include selling, general and administrative expenses and direct administrative costs. Selling, general and administrative costs, excluding commission expense, are allocated to various segments based on a combination of estimated time worked by various support groups and operating costs incurred at the mine. Commission expense, which is a component of selling, is charged directly to the mine incurring the cost. Direct administrative costs are associated directly with the coal segment of the business and are allocated to various mines based on a combination of estimated time worked and production. Selling, administrative and other costs related to the steam coal segment were $127 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $108 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The cost increases attributable to the steam coal segment were attributable to higher selling, general and administrative expenses as discussed in the total Company results of operations section and higher direct administrative costs. Higher direct administrative costs were primarily due to additional safety reward expense in the period-to-period comparison. These higher costs and lower sales volumes resulted in a $0.58 per ton increase in average cost per ton sold.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization for the steam coal segment was $226 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $198 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase was primarily due to additional equipment and infrastructure placed into service after the 2010 period that is depreciated on a straight-line basis. The increase was also due to higher units-of-production rates for steam coal mines due to additional air shafts being placed into service after the 2010 period which had higher unit rates than historical shafts put into service. These higher expenses and lower sales tons, resulted in a $0.91 increase in average costs per ton sold.





70



HIGH VOL METALLURGICAL COAL SEGMENT
The high volatile metallurgical coal segment contributed $111 million to total Company earnings before income tax for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $70 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 . The high volatile metallurgical coal revenue and cost components on a per unit basis for these periods are as follows:

 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
Percent
Change
Produced High Vol Met Tons Sold (in millions)
3.5

 
1.8

 
1.7

 
94.4
%
Average Sales Price Per High Vol Met Ton Sold
$
78.75

 
$
73.65

 
$
5.10

 
6.9
%
Average Operating Costs Per High Vol Met Ton Sold
$
35.98

 
$
28.89

 
$
7.09

 
24.5
%
Average Provision Costs Per High Vol Met Ton Sold
$
4.15

 
$
3.08

 
$
1.07

 
34.7
%
Average Selling, Administrative and Other Costs Per High Vol Met Ton Sold
$
3.63

 
$
2.26

 
$
1.37

 
60.6
%
Average Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization Costs Per High Vol Met Ton Sold
$
6.25

 
$
4.24

 
$
2.01

 
47.4
%
     Total Average Costs Per High Vol Met Ton Sold
$
50.01

 
$
38.47

 
$
11.54

 
30.0
%
     Margin Per High Vol Met Ton Sold
$
28.74

 
$
35.18

 
$
(6.44
)
 
(18.3
%)

High volatile metallurgical coal revenue was $278 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $135 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Strength in the metallurgical coal market has continued to allow the export of Northern Appalachian coal, historically sold domestically on the steam coal market, to crossover to the Brazilian and Asian metallurgical coal markets. As a result average sales prices for high volatile metallurgical coal have increased due to growing the base of end user customers.
Other income attributed to the high volatile metallurgical coal segment represents earnings from our equity affiliates that operate high volatile metallurgical coal mines. The equity in earnings of affiliates is insignificant to the total segment activity.
Operating costs related to the high volatile metallurgical coal segment were $126 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $53 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Operating costs related to the high volatile metallurgical coal segment increased primarily due to higher average costs per ton sold and higher volumes sold.
Changes in average operating costs per ton for high volatile metallurgical coal sold were primarily related to the following items:
Average operating costs per ton sold increased due to the mix of mines selling coal on the high volatile metallurgical coal market. As higher cost structure mines sell coal in the high volatile metallurgical market, average operating costs per ton sold increase. Previously, this segment only included lower cost structure mines.
Labor and related benefits increased due to higher employee counts, higher non-union benefit rates and higher contributions per hour worked to the 1974 Pension Trust (Trust). Labor and related benefits increased due to additional employees in the period-to-period comparison. Higher labor and related costs were also due to higher non-union benefit rates for active employees related to the continued increase in healthcare costs. Higher contributions made to the Trust were discussed in the steam coal segment. Labor and related benefits also increased due to additional employees and the impact of the wage increases of $1.50 per hour worked, $0.50 per hour worked effective January 1, 2011 under the previous collective bargaining agreement and $1.00 per hour worked effective July 1, 2011 related to the new collective bargaining agreement, in the period-to-period comparison. These increases were offset by lower overall contributions to certain multiemployer benefit plans such as the 1992 Fund, the 1993 Fund and the Combined Fund, which were also discussed in the steam coal segment. Increased labor and related benefit costs per unit sold were also offset, in part, by additional volumes of high volatile metallurgical tons sold in the period-to-period comparison.
Average operating supplies & maintenance costs per ton sold increased due to additional maintenance and equipment overhaul costs and additional roof control costs. Additional maintenance and equipment overhaul costs were related to additional equipment being serviced in the current period. Additional roof control costs resulted from changes in roof support strategy, such as using longer roof bolts and additional types of roof support, in order to improve the safety of our mines and to provide a more reliable source of production for our customers. Roof control costs also increased due to higher steel prices in the period-to-period comparison.
Average coal preparation costs per ton sold increased due to additional maintenance projects that have been completed


71



at our preparation plants in the period-to-period comparison.
Production taxes average cost per ton sold increased due to the $5.10 per ton higher average sales price.
In-transit charges average cost per ton sold increased primarily due to the increased cost of moving coal from the mine to the preparation plant for processing. This increase is primarily related to the mix of mines now shipping high volatile metallurgical coal.
Subsidence costs per ton sold increased due to more structures and higher costs related to these structures that were impacted by longwall mining in the period-to-period comparison. Subsidence costs also increased due to an increase in the length of streams that were impacted by longwall mining in the period-to-period comparison.
Average operating costs per ton sold decreased due to higher tons sold. Therefore, fixed costs were allocated over more tons; therefore, unit costs decreased. 

The provision expense attributable to the high volatile metallurgical coal segment was $15 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in the high volatile metallurgical coal provision expense was attributable to the total Company increased long-term liability expense discussed in the total Company results of operations section. The per unit impairment was offset, in part, by additional tons sold in the period-to-period comparison. Also, high volatile metallurgical coal accretion expense related to mine closing and related liabilities remained consistent in the period-to-period comparison which contributed to lower costs per ton sold.
Selling, administrative and other costs attributable to the high volatile metallurgical coal segment include selling, general and administrative expenses and direct administrative costs. Selling, general and administrative expenses, excluding commission expense, are allocated to various segments based on a combination of estimated time worked by various support groups and operating costs incurred at the mine. Commission expense, which is a component of selling, is charged directly to the mine incurring the cost. Direct administrative costs are associated directly with the coal segment of the business and are allocated to various mines based on a combination of estimated time worked and production. Selling, administrative and other costs related to the high volatile metallurgical coal segment were $13 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The cost increase attributable to the high volatile metallurgical coal segment is attributable to higher total Company selling, general and administrative expenses as discussed in the total Company results of operations section and higher direct administrative costs. Higher direct administrative costs are primarily due to additional safety reward expense in the period-to-period comparison. These increases in expense increased unit costs per ton sold and were offset, in part, by higher volumes of high volatile metallurgical coal sold.

Depreciation, depletion and amortization for the high volatile metallurgical coal segment was $22 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase was primarily due to additional equipment and infrastructure placed into service after the 2010 period that is depreciated on a straight-line basis. The increase was also due to higher units-of-production rates for high volatile metallurgical coal mines related to additional air shafts being placed into service after the 2010 period which had higher unit rates than historical shafts put into service. These increases in unit costs per ton sold were offset, in part, by additional high volatile metallurgical tons sold which lowered the unit cost per ton impact.
 
The high volatile metallurgical coal segment increased the margin on our coal production that would have otherwise been sold in the domestic steam coal market.


72




LOW VOL METALLURGICAL COAL SEGMENT
The low volatile metallurgical coal segment contributed $525 million to total Company earnings before income tax in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $269 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The low volatile metallurgical coal revenue and cost components on a per ton basis for these periods are as follows:

 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
Percent
Change
Produced Low Vol Met Tons Sold (in millions)
4.3

 
3.5

 
0.8

 
22.9
%
Average Sales Price Per Low Vol Met Ton Sold
$
191.84

 
$
140.27

 
$
51.57

 
36.8
%
Average Operating Costs Per Low Vol Met Ton Sold
$
51.84

 
$
49.44

 
$
2.40

 
4.9
%
Average Provision Costs Per Low Vol Met Ton Sold
$
6.63

 
$
5.80

 
$
0.83

 
14.3
%
Average Selling, Administrative and Other Costs Per Low Vol Met Ton Sold
$
4.88

 
$
3.96

 
$
0.92

 
23.2
%
Average Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization Costs Per Low Vol Met Ton Sold
$
6.30

 
$
4.35

 
$
1.95

 
44.8
%
     Total Average Costs Per Low Vol Met Ton Sold
$
69.65

 
$
63.55

 
$
6.10

 
9.6
%
     Margin Per Low Vol Met Ton Sold
$
122.19

 
$
76.72

 
$
45.47

 
59.3
%

Low volatile metallurgical coal revenue was $824 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $491 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The $333 million increase was attributable to a $51.57 per ton higher average sales price due to the continued strengthening of the low volatile metallurgical market, both domestic and foreign. The continued strength of these markets is related to continued worldwide demand for premium low volatile metallurgical coal. For the 2011 period, 3.6 million tons of low volatile metallurgical coal was sold on the export market at an average price of $195.38 per ton compared to 2.6 million tons at an average price of $138.41 per ton for the 2010 period.

Operating costs are made up of labor, supplies, maintenance, subsidence, taxes other than income and preparation plant charges related to the extraction and sale of coal. These costs are reviewed regularly by management and are considered to be the direct responsibility of mine management. Operating costs related to the low volatile metallurgical coal segment were $223 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $173 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Operating costs related to the low volatile metallurgical coal segment increased primarily due to higher volumes sold.
 
  Changes in the average operating costs per ton for low volatile metallurgical coal sold were primarily related to the following items:
Average operating supplies and maintenance costs per ton sold increased due to additional roof control costs, additional ventilation costs of coalbed methane gas and additional equipment overhaul costs. Additional roof control costs resulted from changes in roof support strategy, such as types of roof support used and quantity of support put into place. The roof control strategy was changed to improve the safety of the mine and to provide a more reliable source of production for our customers. Roof control costs also increased due to higher steel prices in the period-to-period comparison. Additional costs were incurred in the 2011 period to increase the number of bore holes that were placed ahead of mining to ventilate the coalbed methane gas from the mine. Additional maintenance and equipment overhaul costs are related to additional equipment being serviced in the current period.
Costs associated with the sales price of coal sold, such as royalties and production related taxes, increased due to the higher average sales prices received for low volatile metallurgical coal in the period-to-period comparison.
 
The provision expense attributable to the low volatile metallurgical coal segment was $28 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $20 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increased low volatile metallurgical coal provision expense per ton sold was attributable to the total Company's increased long-term liability expense discussed in the total Company results of operations section, offset, in part, by higher volumes of low volatile metallurgical coal sold. Low volatile metallurgical coal accretion expense related to mine closing and related liabilities decreased approximately $1 million in the period-to-period comparison as a result of the annual engineering surveys which contributed to lower average costs per ton sold.



73



Selling, administrative and other costs attributable to the low volatile metallurgical coal segment include selling, general and administrative expenses, direct administrative costs and water treatment expenses generated from the reverse osmosis plant. Selling, general and administrative costs, excluding commission expense and water treatment expense, are allocated to various segments on a combination of estimated time worked by various support groups and operating costs incurred at the mine. Commission expense, which is a component of selling, is charged directly to the mine incurring the cost. Direct administrative costs are associated directly with the coal segment of the business and are allocated to various mines based on a combination of estimated time worked and production. Selling, administrative and other costs related to the low volatile metallurgical coal segment were $21 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $14 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The cost increase related to the low volatile metallurgical coal segment was attributable to higher selling, general and administrative expenses as discussed in the total Company results of operations section. Also, a reverse osmosis plant was completed and placed into service near the Buchanan Mine. Active mine water discharge is being treated by this facility and the costs of these services are charged to the mine based on gallons of water treated. Currently, the Buchanan Mine is the only facility using the plant. Construction of the plant was completed and the plant was placed into service in January 2011. These increases in expense were offset, in part, by higher volumes of low volatile metallurgical coal sold.
 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization for the low volatile metallurgical coal segment was $27 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $15 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase was primarily due to additional equipment, infrastructure and the reverse osmosis plant placed into service after the 2010 period that is depreciated on a straight-line basis. The increase was also due to higher units-of-production rates due to additional air shafts being placed into service during the 2010 period which had higher unit rates than historical shafts put into service. These increases in average costs per ton sold were offset, in part, by higher low volatile metallurgical tons sold which lowered the unit cost per ton impact. 


OTHER COAL SEGMENT
The other coal segment had a loss before income tax of $290 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to a loss before income tax of $306 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The other coal segment includes purchased coal activities, idle mine activities, as well as various activities assigned to the coal segment but not allocated to each individual mine.
Other coal segment produced coal sales includes revenue from the sale of 0.3 million tons of coal which was recovered during the reclamation process at idled facilities for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 0.1 million tons for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The primary focus of the activity at these locations is reclaiming disturbed land in accordance with the mining permit requirements after final mining has occurred. The tons sold are incidental to total Company production or sales.
Purchased coal sales consist of revenues from processing third-party coal in our preparation plants for blending purposes to meet customer coal specifications, coal purchased from third parties and sold directly to our customers and revenues from processing third-party coal in our preparation plants. The revenues were $38 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $26 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase was primarily due to increased volumes sold.
Freight revenue is the amount billed to customers for transportation costs incurred. This revenue is based on weight of coal shipped, negotiated freight rates and method of transportation (i.e. rail, barge, truck, etc.) used by the customers to which CONSOL Energy contractually provides transportation services. Freight revenue is offset in freight expense. Freight revenue was $156 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $97 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in freight revenue was primarily due to the 2.7 million ton increase in export tons in the period-to-period comparison.
Miscellaneous other income was $52 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $41 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase of $11 million was primarily related to issuing pipeline right-of-ways to a third party which resulted in a gain of $10 million and $1 million of various other transactions that occurred throughout both periods, none of which were individually material.


74



Other coal segment total costs were $559 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $477 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase of $82 million was due to the following items:
 
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
Abandonment of long-lived assets
 
$
116

 
$

 
$
116

Freight expense
 
156

 
97

 
59

Purchased Coal
 
59

 
30

 
29

Coal contract buyout
 
5

 

 
5

Closed and idle mines
 
80

 
184

 
(104
)
Litigation expense
 

 
35

 
(35
)
Other
 
143

 
131

 
12

   Total other coal segment costs
 
$
559

 
$
477

 
$
82


Abandonment of long-lived assets was $116 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 as a result of the decision to permanently idle Mine 84.
Freight expense is based on weight of coal shipped, negotiated freight rates and method of transportation (i.e. rail, barge, truck, etc.) used by the customers to which CONSOL Energy contractually provides transportation services. Freight revenue is the amount billed to customers for transportation costs incurred. Freight expense is offset in freight revenue. The increase was primarily due to the 2.7 million ton increase in export tons in the period-to-period comparison.
Purchased coal costs increased approximately $29 million in the period-to-period comparison primarily due to differences in the quality of coal purchased, increases in the market price of coal purchased, and an increase in the volumes of coal purchased in the period-to-period comparison.
Coal contract buyout costs increased $5 million as a result of a lower priced coal sales contract being bought out in order to sell the tons on a higher priced contract in a future period.
Closed and idle mine costs decreased approximately $104 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010. In the 2010 period, as a result of market conditions, permitting issues, new regulatory requirements and resulting changes in mining plans, the reclamation liability associated with the Fola mining operations in West Virginia was increased $82 million. Also in the 2010 period, closed and idle mine costs increased approximately $14 million as the result of the change in mine plan at Mine 84. As a result of the mine plan change, a portion of the previously developed area of the mine was abandoned. In addition, $8 million of reduced expenses were recognized in closed and idle mine costs for various changes in the operational status of other mines, between idled and operating, throughout both periods, none of which were individually material
Litigation expense of $25 million was recognized in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 related to an anticipated legal settlement related to water discharge from our Buchanan Mine being stored in mine voids of adjacent properties which were leased by CONSOL Energy subsidiaries. Litigation expense was also recognized in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 related to a settlement that included the sale of Jones Fork which resulted in a loss of $10 million.
Other expenses related to the coal segment were $12 million higher for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase was related to a $5 million charge for an additional liability due to Pennsylvania stream remediation and $7 million of the increase was related to various transactions that occurred throughout both periods, none of which were individually material.


75




TOTAL GAS SEGMENT ANALYSIS for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010 :
The gas segment contributed $53 million to earnings before income tax in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $163 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 .

 
For the Nine Months Ended
 
Difference to Nine Months Ended
 
September 30, 2011
 
September 30, 2010
 
CBM
 
Conven-
tional
 
Marcellus
 
Other
Gas
 
Total
Gas
 
CBM
 
Conven-
tional
 
Marcellus
 
Other
Gas
 
Total
Gas
Sales:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Produced
$
345

 
$
120

 
$
88

 
$
9

 
$
562

 
$
(104
)
 
$
42

 
$
54

 
$
4

 
$
(4
)
Related Party
4

 

 

 

 
4

 
(1
)
 

 

 

 
(1
)
Total Outside Sales
349

 
120

 
88

 
9

 
566

 
(105
)
 
42

 
54

 
4

 
(5
)
Gas Royalty Interest

 

 

 
52

 
52

 

 

 

 
5

 
5

Purchased Gas

 

 

 
3

 
3

 

 

 

 
(5
)
 
(5
)
Other Income

 

 

 
(9
)
 
(9
)
 

 

 

 
(12
)
 
(12
)
Total Revenue and Other Income
349

 
120

 
88

 
55

 
612

 
(105
)
 
42

 
54

 
(8
)
 
(17
)
Lifting
38

 
43

 
12

 
2

 
95

 
(1
)
 
25

 
9

 
1

 
34

Gathering
71

 
20

 
10

 
2

 
103

 
(3
)
 
12

 
2

 

 
11

General & Administration
46

 
23

 
12

 
1

 
82

 
(1
)
 
11

 
7

 
2

 
19

Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
75

 
48

 
29

 
7

 
159

 
(8
)
 
9

 
16

 
2

 
19

Gas Royalty Interest

 

 

 
47

 
47

 

 

 

 
6

 
6

Purchased Gas

 

 

 
3

 
3

 

 

 

 
(4
)
 
(4
)
Exploration and Other Costs

 

 

 
10

 
10

 

 

 

 
(11
)
 
(11
)
Other Corporate Expenses

 

 

 
49

 
49

 

 

 

 
9

 
9

Interest Expense

 

 

 
7

 
7

 

 

 

 
1

 
1

Total Cost
230

 
134

 
63

 
128

 
555

 
(13
)
 
57

 
34

 
6

 
84

Earnings Before Noncontrolling Interest and Income Tax
119

 
(14
)
 
25

 
(73
)
 
57

 
(92
)
 
(15
)
 
20

 
(14
)
 
(101
)
Noncontrolling Interest

 

 

 
4

 
4

 

 

 

 
9

 
9

Earnings Before Income Tax
$
119

 
$
(14
)
 
$
25

 
$
(77
)
 
$
53

 
$
(92
)
 
$
(15
)
 
$
20

 
$
(23
)
 
$
(110
)




76



COALBED METHANE (CBM) GAS SEGMENT
The CBM segment contributed $119 million to the total Company earnings before income tax for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $211 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 .
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
Percent
Change
Produced gas CBM sales volumes (in billion cubic feet)
68.6

 
67.7

 
0.9

 
1.3
 %
Average CBM sales price per thousand cubic feet sold
$
5.09

 
$
6.70

 
$
(1.61
)
 
(24.0
)%
Average CBM lifting costs per thousand cubic feet sold
$
0.56

 
$
0.57

 
$
(0.01
)
 
(1.8
)%
Average CBM gathering costs per thousand cubic feet sold
$
1.04

 
$
1.09

 
$
(0.05
)
 
(4.6
)%
Average CBM general & administrative costs per thousand cubic feet sold
$
0.67

 
$
0.69

 
$
(0.02
)
 
(2.9
)%
Average CBM depreciation, depletion and amortization costs per thousand cubic feet sold
$
1.09

 
$
1.23

 
$
(0.14
)
 
(11.4
)%
   Total Average CBM costs per thousand cubic feet sold
$
3.36

 
$
3.58

 
$
(0.22
)
 
(6.1
)%
   Average Margin for CBM
$
1.73

 
$
3.12

 
$
(1.39
)
 
(44.6
)%

CBM sales revenues were $349 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $454 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The $105 million decrease was primarily due to a 24.0% decrease in average sales price per thousand cubic feet sold, offset, in part, by a 1.3% increase in average volumes sold. The decrease in CBM average sales price is the result of various gas swap transactions that matured in each period and lower average market prices. The gas swap transactions qualify as financial cash flow hedges that exist parallel to the underlying physical transactions. These financial hedges represented approximately 45.1 billion cubic feet of our produced CBM gas sales volumes for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 at an average price of $5.37 per thousand cubic feet. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, these financial hedges represented 39.7 billion cubic feet at an average price of $8.12 per thousand cubic feet. CBM sales volumes increased 0.9 billion cubic feet primarily due to additional wells coming on-line from our on-going drilling program.
Total costs for the CBM segment were $230 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $243 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Lower costs in the period-to-period comparison are primarily related to increased volumes sold offset, in part, by lower unit costs.
 
CBM lifting costs were $38 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $39 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Lifting costs decreased slightly in the period-to-period comparison due primarily to the increased volumes sold.
CBM gathering costs were $71 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $74 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Lower average CBM gathering unit costs are related to lower fuel surcharges and unutilized firm transportation being reported in other corporate expenses in the 2011 period.
General and administrative costs attributable to the total gas division were $82 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $63 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The $19 million increase was attributable to additional corporate service charges from CONSOL Energy and additional staffing. Corporate service charge allocations are primarily based on revenue and capital expenditure projections between coal and gas as a percent of total. The additional staffing is primarily due to the majority of the operational support staff being retained from the Dominion Acquisition which closed on April 30, 2010.
General and administrative costs for the CBM segment were $46 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $47 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. General and administrative costs attributable to the total gas segment are allocated to the individual gas segments based on a combination of production and employee counts. The consistent general and administrative costs attributable to the CBM segment coupled with higher volumes of CBM sold resulted in lower unit costs in the period-to-period comparison.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization attributable to the CBM segment was $75 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $83 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. There was approximately $53 million, or $0.77 per unit-of-production, of depreciation, depletion and amortization related to CBM gas and related well equipment that was reflected on a units-of-production method of depreciation in the nine months ended September 30, 2011.


77



The production portion of depreciation, depletion and amortization was $64 million, or $0.95 per unit-of-production in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The CBM unit-of-production rate decreased due to revised rates which are generally calculated using the net book value of assets divided by either proved or proved developed reserve additions. There was approximately $22 million, or $0.32 average per unit cost of depreciation, depletion and amortization relating to gathering and other equipment reflected on a straight line basis for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The non-production related depreciation, depletion and amortization was $19 million, or $0.28 per thousand cubic feet for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase was related to additional gathering assets placed in service after the 2010 period.

CONVENTIONAL GAS SEGMENT
The conventional segment had a loss before income tax of $14 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $1 million of earnings before income tax for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
Percent
Change
Produced gas Conventional sales volumes (in billion cubic feet)
24.0

 
15.9

 
8.1

 
50.9
 %
Average Conventional sales price per thousand cubic feet sold
$
5.00

 
$
4.91

 
$
0.09

 
1.8
 %
Average Conventional lifting costs per thousand cubic feet sold
$
1.79

 
$
1.12

 
$
0.67

 
59.8
 %
Average Conventional gathering costs per thousand cubic feet sold
$
0.84

 
$
0.54

 
$
0.30

 
55.6
 %
Average Conventional general & administrative costs per thousand cubic feet sold
$
0.97

 
$
0.74

 
$
0.23

 
31.1
 %
Average Conventional depreciation, depletion and amortization costs per thousand cubic feet sold
$
2.00

 
$
2.45

 
$
(0.45
)
 
(18.4
)%
   Total Average Conventional costs per thousand cubic feet sold
$
5.60

 
$
4.85

 
$
0.75

 
15.5
 %
   Average Margin for Conventional
$
(0.60
)
 
$
0.06

 
$
(0.66
)
 
(1,100.0
)%
Conventional sales revenues were $120 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $78 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The $42 million increase was primarily due to the 50.9% increase in volumes sold as well as the 1.8% increase in average sales price. Conventional sales volumes increased 8.1 billion cubic feet in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the 2010 period primarily due to the Dominion Acquisition, which closed on April 30, 2010. Approximately 95% of the acquired producing wells were conventional type wells. Average sales price increased primarily due to quality of natural gas and increased oil prices in the period-to-period comparison. The increase in conventional sales price was also the result of various gas swap transactions that matured in the nine months ended September 30, 2011. These gas swap transactions qualify as financial cash flow hedges that exist parallel to the underlying physical transactions. These financial hedges represented approximately 8.0 billion cubic feet of our produced conventional gas sales volumes for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 at an average price of $4.97 per thousand cubic feet. There were no conventional gas swap transactions that occurred in the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Total costs for the conventional segment were $134 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $77 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase is attributable to increased variable costs associated with the additional sales volumes and higher average unit costs. A detailed analysis of cost categories is not meaningful due to the significant change in this segment related to the Dominion Acquisition.  


78




MARCELLUS GAS SEGMENT
The Marcellus segment contributed $25 million to the total Company earnings before income tax for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 .
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
Percent
Change
Produced gas Marcellus sales volumes (in billion cubic feet)
19.7

 
7.1

 
12.6

 
177.5
 %
Average Marcellus sales price per thousand cubic feet sold
$
4.48

 
$
4.79

 
$
(0.31
)
 
(6.5
)%
Average Marcellus lifting costs per thousand cubic feet sold
$
0.63

 
$
0.47

 
$
0.16

 
34.0
 %
Average Marcellus gathering costs per thousand cubic feet sold
$
0.49

 
$
1.07

 
$
(0.58
)
 
(54.2
)%
Average Marcellus general & administrative costs per thousand cubic feet sold
$
0.63

 
$
0.67

 
$
(0.04
)
 
(6.0
)%
Average Marcellus depreciation, depletion and amortization costs per thousand cubic feet sold
$
1.48

 
$
1.88

 
$
(0.40
)
 
(21.3
)%
   Total Average Marcellus costs per thousand cubic feet sold
$
3.23

 
$
4.09

 
$
(0.86
)
 
(21.0
)%
   Average Margin for Marcellus
$
1.25

 
$
0.70

 
$
0.55

 
78.6
 %
The Marcellus segment sales revenues were $88 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $34 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The $54 million increase was primarily due to a 177.5% increase in average volumes sold, offset, in part, by a 6.5% decrease in average sales price per thousand cubic feet sold. The decrease in Marcellus average sales price was the result of the decline in general market prices. These decreases were offset, in part, by various gas swap transactions that matured in the nine months ended September 30, 2011. These gas swap transactions qualify as financial cash flow hedges that exist parallel to the underlying physical transactions. These financial hedges represented approximately 6.8 billion cubic feet of our produced Marcellus gas sales volumes for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 at an average price of $4.60 per thousand cubic feet. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, these financial hedges represented 0.4 billion cubic feet at an average price of $5.05 per thousand cubic feet. The increase in sales volumes is primarily due to additional wells coming on-line from our on-going drilling program. At September 30, 2011, there were 89 Marcellus Shale wells in production. At September 30, 2010, there were 45 Marcellus Shale wells in production.
Marcellus lifting costs were $12 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Lifting costs per unit increased $0.16 per thousand cubic feet sold primarily due to increased expenses for fishing services and mechanical scale removal performed to improve production, increased non-operated well costs, and increased well tending due to an increased number of wells and escalation of rates. These improvements were partially offset by lower salt water disposition costs due to re-utilizing water produced for hydraulic fracing and improved repairs and maintenance primarily as a result of increased sales volumes.
Marcellus gathering costs were $10 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Average gathering costs decreased $0.58 per unit primarily due to the 12.6 billion cubic feet of additional volumes sold.
General and administrative costs for the Marcellus gas segment were $12 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. General and administrative costs attributable to the total gas segment are allocated to the individual gas segments based on a combination of production and employee counts. The total general and administrative costs increases which were discussed in the CBM segment and higher volumes of Marcellus gas sold contributed to the increase in the Marcellus gas segment. General and administrative costs were $0.63 per thousand cubic feet sold for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $0.67 per thousand cubic feet sold for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization costs were $29 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $13 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. There was approximately $22 million, or $1.08 per unit-of-production, of depreciation, depletion and amortization related to Marcellus gas and related well equipment that was reflected on a units-of-production method of depreciation in the nine months ended September 30, 2011. There was approximately $12 million, or $1.70 per unit-of-production, of depreciation, depletion and amortization related to Marcellus gas and related well equipment that was reflected on a units-of-production method of depreciation for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The rate was calculated by taking the net book value of the related assets divided by either proved or proved developed reserves, generally at the previous year end. There was approximately $7 million, or $0.40 per thousand cubic feet, of


79



depreciation, depletion and amortization related to gathering and other equipment that was reflected on a straight line basis for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. There was $1 million, or $0.18 per thousand cubic feet, of depreciation, depletion and amortization related to gathering and other equipment reflected on a straight line basis for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase was related to additional infrastructure and equipment placed in service after the 2010 period.
OTHER GAS SEGMENT
The other gas segment includes activity not assigned to the CBM, conventional or Marcellus gas segments. This segment includes purchased gas activity, gas royalty interest activity, exploration and other costs, other corporate expenses, and miscellaneous operational activity not assigned to a specific gas segment.
Other gas sales volumes are primarily related to production from the Chattanooga Shale in Tennessee. Revenue from this operation was approximately $9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and $5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Total costs related to these other sales were $12 million for the 2011 period and were $7 million for the 2010 period. The increase in costs in the period-to-period comparison were primarily attributable to depreciation, depletion and amortization and increased lifting and gathering costs. Higher depreciation, depletion and amortization was due to higher volumes produced and higher unit of production rates. Increased lifting costs were primarily attributable to increased non-operated shale wells in the period-to-period comparison. Increased gathering costs were attributable to the increased sales volumes. A per unit analysis of the other operating costs in the Chattanooga shale is not meaningful due to the low volumes produced in the period-to-period analysis.
Royalty interest gas sales represent the revenues related to the portion of production belonging to royalty interest owners sold by the CONSOL Energy gas segment. Royalty interest gas sales revenue was $52 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $47 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The changes in market prices, contractual differences among leases, and the mix of average and index prices used in calculating royalties contributed to the period-to-period change.
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
Percent
Change
Gas Royalty Interest Sales Volumes (in billion cubic feet)
12.2


9.9

 
2.3

 
23.2
 %
Average Sales Price Per thousand cubic feet
$
4.27


$
4.69

 
$
(0.42
)
 
(9.0
)%

Purchased gas sales volumes represent volumes of gas sold at market prices that were purchased from third-party producers. Purchased gas sales revenues were $3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
Percent
Change
Purchased Gas Sales Volumes (in billion cubic feet)
0.7


1.5

 
(0.8
)
 
(53.3
)%
Average Sales Price Per thousand cubic feet
$
4.50


$
5.65

 
$
(1.15
)
 
(20.4
)%

Other income was a loss of $9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to income of $3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The $12 million decrease was primarily due to a loss on the Noble transaction of $58 million. This loss was partially offset by a gain on the sale of the Antero overriding royalty interest of $41 million, $2 million due to increased earnings from equity affiliates and $3 million due to various transactions that occurred throughout both periods, none of which were individually material.


80



Royalty interest gas costs represent the costs related to the portion of production belonging to royalty interest owners sold by the CONSOL Energy gas segment. Royalty interest gas costs were $47 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $41 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The changes in market prices, contractual differences among leases, and the mix of average and index prices used in calculating royalties contributed to the period-to-period change.
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
Percent
Change
Gas Royalty Interest Sales Volumes (in billion cubic feet)
12.2


9.9

 
2.3

 
23.2
 %
Average Cost Per thousand cubic feet sold
$
3.81


$
4.05

 
$
(0.24
)
 
(5.9
)%

Purchased gas volumes represent volumes of gas purchased from third-party producers that we sell. Purchased gas volumes also reflect the impact of pipeline imbalances. The lower average cost per thousand cubic feet is due to overall price changes and contractual differences among customers in the period-to-period comparison. Purchased gas costs were $3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
Percent
Change
Purchased Gas Volumes (in billion cubic feet)
0.9


1.3

 
(0.4
)
 
(30.8
)%
Average Cost Per thousand cubic feet sold
$
3.11


$
5.44

 
$
(2.33
)
 
(42.8
)%
Exploration and other costs were $10 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $21 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The $11 million decrease in costs is primarily related to a favorable settlement involving defective pipe which reduced expense in the 2011 period and lower dry hole and lease surrender costs in the 2011 period. Costs included in the exploration and other cost line are detailed as follows:
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
Percent
Change
Dry Hole and Lease Expiration Costs (including settlement)
$
7

 
$
18

 
$
(11
)
 
(61.1
)%
Exploration
3

 
3

 

 
 %
Total Exploration and Other Costs
$
10

 
$
21

 
$
(11
)
 
(52.4
)%
Other corporate expenses were $49 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $40 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The $9 million increase in the period-to-period comparison was made up of the following items:
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
Percent
Change
Unutilized firm transportation
$
11

 
$
1

 
$
10

 
1,000.0
 %
Short-term incentive compensation
19

 
14

 
5

 
35.7
 %
Contract buyout
3

 

 
3

 
100.0
 %
Stock-based compensation
13

 
11

 
2

 
18.2
 %
Bank fees
5

 
3

 
2

 
66.7
 %
Variable interest earnings
(4
)
 
4

 
(8
)
 
(200.0
)%
Legal fees

 
3

 
(3
)
 
(100.0
)%
Other
2

 
4

 
(2
)
 
(50.0
)%
Total Other Corporate Expenses
$
49

 
$
40

 
$
9

 
22.5
 %

Unutilized firm transportation represents pipeline transportation capacity that the gas segment has obtained to enable gas production to flow uninterrupted as the gas operations continue to increase sales volumes.
The short-term incentive compensation program is designed to increase compensation to eligible employees when


81



CNX Gas reaches predetermined targets for safety, production and unit costs. Short-term incentive compensation increased in the period-to-period comparison as the result of exceeding the targets in the 2011 period, increased number of employees, and an increased allocation of expense from CONSOL Energy as the result of exceeding corporate targets.
Contract buyout represents the cancellation of a drilling arrangement with a third party well driller.
Stock-based compensation was higher in the period-to-period comparison primarily due to the increased allocation from CONSOL Energy as a result of the Dominion Acquisition as well as an increase in total CONSOL Energy stock-based compensation expense. Stock-based compensation costs are allocated to the gas segment based on revenue and capital expenditure projections between coal and gas.

Bank fees were higher in the period-to-period comparison due to amending and extending the revolving credit facility related to the gas segment. In April 2011, the facility was amended to allow $1 billion of borrowings and was extended to April 12, 2016.

Variable interest earnings are related to various adjustments a third party entity has reflected in its financial statements. CONSOL Energy holds no ownership interest and during the 2011 period de-consolidated the impact of this third party due to the cancellation of the drilling arrangement. Based on analysis, during the time CONSOL Energy guaranteed the bank loans the entity held, it was determined that CONOL Energy was the primary beneficiary. Therefore, the entity was fully consolidated and the earnings impact is fully reversed in the non-controlling interest line discussed below.

Legal fees for the 2010 period were related to the special committee formed during the CNX Gas take-in transaction and also represent legal fees related to the shareholder litigation related to this transaction.

Other corporate related expense decreased $2 million in the period-to-period comparison due to various transactions that occurred throughout both periods, none of which were individually material.
Interest expense related to the other gas segment was $7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Interest was incurred by the other gas segment on the CNX Gas revolving credit facility, a capital lease and debt held by a variable interest entity. The $1 million increase was primarily due to higher levels of borrowings on the revolving credit facility in the period-to-period comparison.

Noncontrolling interest represents 100% of the earnings impact of a third party which has been determined to be a variable interest entity, in which CONSOL Energy holds no ownership interest, but is the primary beneficiary. The CONSOL Energy gas division has been determined to be the primary beneficiary due to guarantees of the third party's bank debt related to their purchase of drilling rigs. The third-party entity provides drilling services primarily to the CONSOL Energy gas division. CONSOL Energy consolidates the entity and then reflects 100% of the impact as noncontrolling interest. The consolidation does not significantly impact any amounts reflected in the gas division income statement. The variance in the noncontrolling amounts reflects the third party's variance in earnings in the period-to-period comparison. In the three months ended September 30, 2011, the drilling services contract was bought out. Subsequent to this transaction, the noncontrolling interest was de-consolidated.


82




OTHER SEGMENT ANALYSIS for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010 :
The other segment includes activity from the sales of industrial supplies, the transportation operations and various other corporate activities that are not allocated to the coal or gas segment. The other segment had a loss before income tax of $222 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to a loss before income tax of $ 184 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 . The other segment also includes total company income tax expense of $113 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $75 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 .

 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
Percent
Change
Sales—Outside
$
252

 
$
220

 
$
32

 
14.5
 %
Other Income
14

 
22

 
(8
)
 
(36.4
)%
Total Revenue
266

 
242

 
24

 
9.9
 %
Cost of Goods Sold and Other Charges
282

 
269

 
13

 
4.8
 %
Depreciation, Depletion & Amortization
14

 
14

 

 
 %
Taxes Other Than Income Tax
9

 
9

 

 
 %
Interest Expense
183

 
134

 
49

 
36.6
 %
Total Costs
488

 
426

 
62

 
14.6
 %
Loss Before Income Tax
(222
)
 
(184
)
 
(38
)
 
(20.7
)%
Income Tax
113

 
75

 
38

 
50.7
 %
Net Loss
$
(335
)
 
$
(259
)
 
$
(76
)
 
(29.3
)%

Industrial supplies:
Total revenue from industrial supplies was $172 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $145 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 . The increase was related to higher sales volumes.
Total costs related to industrial supply sales were $173 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $145 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 . The increase of $28 million was primarily related to higher sales volumes and last-in, first-out inventory valuations.
Transportation operations:
Total revenue from transportation operations was $88 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $84 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 . The increase of $4 million was primarily attributable to additional through-put tons at the Baltimore terminal in the period-to-period comparison.
Total costs related to the transportation operations were $66 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $60 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 . The increase of $6 million was related to the additional through-put tons handled by the operations and repairs and maintenance costs to maintain the Baltimore terminal facilities, none of which were individually material.
Miscellaneous other:
Additional other income of $6 million was recognized for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $13 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 . The $7 million decrease was primarily due to the 2010 successful resolution of an outstanding tax issue with the Canadian Revenue Authority for the years 1997 through 2003 in which CONSOL Energy was entitled to interest on a tax refund, lower equity in earnings of affiliates in the current period compared to the prior year period and various transactions that have occurred throughout both periods, none of which were individually material.


83



Other corporate costs in the other segment include interest expense, transaction and financing fees and various other miscellaneous corporate charges. Total other costs were $249 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $221 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 . Other corporate costs increased due to the following items:

 
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
Interest expense
 
$
183

 
$
134

 
$
49

Loss on extinguishment of debt
 
16

 

 
16

Evaluation fees for non-core asset dispositions
 
5

 
2

 
3

Transaction and financing fees
 
15

 
61

 
(46
)
Bank fees
 
16

 
13

 
3

Other
 
14

 
11

 
3

 
 
$
249

 
$
221

 
$
28

Interest expense increased $49 million primarily due to interest expense on the long-term bonds that were issued in conjunction with the Dominion Acquisition in April 2010.
On April 11, 2011, CONSOL Energy redeemed all of its outstanding $250 million, 7.875% senior secured notes due March 1, 2012 in accordance with the terms of the indenture governing these notes. The redemption price included principal of $250 million, a make-whole premium of $16 million and accrued interest of $2 million for a total redemption cost of $268 million. The loss on extinguishment of debt was $16 million, which primarily represented the interest that would have been paid on these notes if held to maturity.
Evaluation fees for non-core asset dispositions increased $3 million in the period-to-period comparison due to various corporate initiatives that began in the 2010 period.
Transaction and financing fees of $61 million incurred in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 primarily related to the Dominion Acquisition, as well as the equity and debt issuance that raised approximately $4.6 billion. Transaction and financing fees of $15 million incurred in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 related to the solicitation of consents of the long-term bonds needed in order to clarify the indentures that relate to joint arrangements with respect to its oil and gas properties.
Bank fees increased $3 million in the period-to-period comparison due to the refinancing and extension of the previous $1.0 billion credit facility to $1.5 billion on May 7, 2010.
Other corporate items increased $3 million due to various transactions that occurred throughout both periods, none of which were individually material.


Income Taxes:
The effective income tax rate was 20.6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to 22.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 . The decrease in the effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was primarily attributable to various discrete transactions that occurred in both periods. The discrete transactions included an Internal Revenue Service audit settlement for 2006 and 2007 and the corresponding impacts to the 2010 accrued tax position which resulted in higher percentage depletion deductions. See Note 5—Income Taxes of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q for additional information. 

 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Variance
 
Percent
Change
Total Company Earnings Before Income Tax
$
550

 
$
329

 
$
221

 
67.2
%
Income Tax Expense
$
113

 
$
75

 
$
38

 
50.7
%
Effective Income Tax Rate
20.6
%
 
22.9
%
 
(2.3
)%
 
 


84





Liquidity and Capital Resources
CONSOL Energy generally has satisfied its working capital requirements and funded its capital expenditures and debt service obligations with cash generated from operations and proceeds from borrowings. On April 12, 2011, CONSOL Energy amended and extended its $1.5 billion Senior Secured Credit Agreement through April 12, 2016. The previous facility was set to expire on May 7, 2014. The amendment provides more favorable pricing and the facility continues to be secured by substantially all of the assets of CONSOL Energy and certain of its subsidiaries. CONSOL Energy's credit facility allows for up to $1.5 billion for borrowings and letters of credit. CONSOL Energy can request an additional $250 million increase in the aggregate borrowing limit amount. Fees and interest rate spreads are based on a ratio of financial covenant debt to twelve-month trailing earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization (EBITDA), measured quarterly. The facility includes a minimum interest coverage ratio covenant of no less than 2.50 to 1.00, measured quarterly. The minimum interest coverage ratio covenant is calculated as the ratio of EBITDA to cash interest expense of CONSOL Energy and certain of its subsidiaries. The interest coverage ratio was 5.56 to 1.00 at September 30, 2011 . The facility includes a maximum leverage ratio covenant of no more than 4.75 to 1.00 through March 2013, and no more than 4.50 to 1.00 thereafter, measured quarterly. The maximum leverage ratio covenant is calculated as the ratio of financial covenant debt to twelve-month trailing EBITDA for CONSOL Energy and certain subsidiaries. Financial covenant debt is comprised of the outstanding indebtedness and specific letters of credit, less cash on hand, of CONSOL Energy and certain of its subsidiaries. EBITDA, as used in the covenant calculation, excludes non-cash compensation expenses, non-recurring transaction expenses, uncommon gains and losses, gains and losses on discontinued operations and includes cash distributions received from affiliates plus pro-rata earnings from material acquisitions. The leverage ratio was 2.17 to 1.00 at September 30, 2011 . The facility also includes a senior secured leverage ratio covenant of no more than 2.00 to 1.00, measured quarterly. The senior secured leverage ratio covenant is calculated as the ratio of secured debt to EBITDA. Secured debt is defined as the outstanding borrowings and letters of credit on the revolving credit facility. The senior secured leverage ratio was 0.19 to 1.00 at September 30, 2011 . Covenants in the facility limit our ability to dispose of assets, make investments, purchase or redeem CONSOL Energy common stock, pay dividends, merge with another company and amend, modify or restate, in any material way, the senior unsecured notes. At September 30, 2011 , the facility had no outstanding borrowings and $ 265,173 of letters of credit outstanding, leaving $ 1,234,827 of unused capacity. From time to time, CONSOL Energy is required to post financial assurances to satisfy contractual and other requirements generated in the normal course of business. Some of these assurances are posted to comply with federal, state or other government agencies statutes and regulations. We sometimes use letters of credit to satisfy these requirements and these letters of credit reduce our borrowing facility capacity.
CONSOL Energy also has an accounts receivable securitization facility. This facility allows the Company to receive, on a revolving basis, up to $200 million of short-term funding and letters of credit. The accounts receivable facility supports sales, on a continuous basis to financial institutions, of eligible trade accounts receivable. CONSOL Energy has agreed to continue servicing the sold receivables for the financial institutions for a fee based upon market rates for similar services. The cost of funds is based on commercial paper rates plus a charge for administrative services paid to financial institutions. At September 30, 2011 , eligible accounts receivable totaled approximately $200 million and there were no outstanding borrowings or letters of credit outstanding against the facility.
On April 11, 2011, CONSOL Energy redeemed all of its outstanding $250 million, 7.875% Notes due March 1, 2012 in accordance with the terms of the indenture governing the Notes. The redemption price included principal of $250 million, a make-whole premium of $16 million and accrued interest of $2 million for a total redemption cost of $268 million. CONSOL Energy's loss on extinguishment of debt was $16 million, which primarily represents the interest that would have been paid on these notes if held to maturity.

On April 12, 2011, CNX Gas entered into a $1.0 billion Senior Secured Credit Agreement which extends until April 12, 2016. It replaced the $700 million senior secured credit facility which was set to expire on May 6, 2014. The replacement facility provides more favorable pricing and the facility continues to be secured by substantially all of the assets of CNX Gas and its subsidiaries. CNX Gas' credit facility allows for up to $1.0 billion for borrowings and letters of credit. CNX Gas can request an additional $250 million increase in the aggregate borrowing limit amount. Fees and interest rate spreads are based on the percentage of facility utilization, measured quarterly. The facility includes a minimum interest coverage ratio covenant of no less than 3.00 to 1.00, measured quarterly. The minimum interest coverage ratio covenant is calculated as the ratio of EBITDA to cash interest expense for CNX Gas and its subsidiaries. The interest coverage ratio was 35.60 to 1.00 at September 30, 2011 . The facility also includes a maximum leverage ratio covenant of no more than 3.50 to 1.00, measured quarterly. The maximum leverage ratio covenant is calculated as the ratio of financial covenant debt to twelve-month trailing EBITDA for CNX Gas and its subsidiaries. Financial covenant debt is comprised of the outstanding indebtedness and letters of credit, less cash on hand, of CNX Gas and its subsidiaries. EBITDA, as used in the covenant calculation, excludes non-cash compensation expenses, non-recurring transaction expenses, gains and losses on the sale of assets, uncommon gains and losses,


85



gains and losses on discontinued operations and includes cash distributions received from affiliates plus pro-rata earnings from material acquisitions. The leverage ratio was 0.00 to 1.00 at September 30, 2011 . Covenants in the facility limit our ability to dispose of assets, make investments, pay dividends and merge with another company. At September 30, 2011 , the facility had no amounts drawn and $ 70,203 of letters of credit outstanding, leaving $ 929,797 of unused capacity.

Uncertainty in the financial markets brings additional potential risks to CONSOL Energy. The risks include declines in our stock price, less availability and higher costs of additional credit, potential counterparty defaults, and commercial bank failures. Financial market disruptions may impact our collection of trade receivables. As a result, CONSOL Energy constantly monitors the creditworthiness of our customers. We believe that our current group of customers are financially sound and represent no abnormal business risk.

CONSOL Energy believes that cash generated from operations and our borrowing capacity will be sufficient to meet our working capital requirements, anticipated capital expenditures (other than major acquisitions), scheduled debt payments, anticipated dividend payments and to provide required letters of credit. Nevertheless, the ability of CONSOL Energy to satisfy its working capital requirements, to service its debt obligations, to fund planned capital expenditures or to pay dividends will depend upon future operating performance, which will be affected by prevailing economic conditions in the coal and gas industries and other financial and business factors, some of which are beyond CONSOL Energy’s control.
In order to manage the market risk exposure of volatile natural gas prices in the future, CONSOL Energy enters into various physical gas supply transactions with both gas marketers and end users for terms varying in length. CONSOL Energy has also entered into various gas swap transactions that qualify as financial cash flow hedges, which exist parallel to the underlying physical transactions. The fair value of these contracts was a net asset of $ 135 million at September 30, 2011 . The ineffective portion of these contracts was insignificant to earnings in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 . No issues related to our hedge agreements have been encountered to date.
CONSOL Energy frequently evaluates potential acquisitions. CONSOL Energy has funded acquisitions with cash generated from operations and a variety of other sources, depending on the size of the transaction, including debt and equity financing. There can be no assurance that additional capital resources, including debt and equity financing, will be available to CONSOL Energy on terms which CONSOL Energy finds acceptable, or at all.

Cash Flows (in millions)
 
 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
Change
Cash flows from operating activities
$
1,252

 
$
879

 
$
373

Cash used in investing activities
$
(231
)
 
$
(5,255
)
 
$
5,024

Cash (used in) provided by financing activities
$
(581
)
 
$
4,326

 
$
(4,907
)

Cash flows provided by operating activities changed in the period-to-period comparison primarily due to the following items:
Operating cash flow increased $183 million in 2011 due to higher net income attributable to CONSOL Energy shareholders in the period-to-period comparison. The 2011 net income included an approximately $75 million reduction due to the abandonment of Mine 84 which is discussed further in Note 8—Property, Plant and Equipment, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-Q. This reduction did not have a corresponding reduction to cash flows from operating activities because it was primarily related to the write-down of assets remaining at Mine 84 at the time of the abandonment, not cash obligations.
Operating cash flows increased $35 million in 2011 compared to the prior year due to differences in accrued income tax liabilities. The decrease in accrued income taxes in 2011 was $4 million compared to a decrease in accrued income taxes in the 2010 period of $39 million.
Operating cash flows increased due to various other changes in operating assets, operating liabilities, other assets and other liabilities which occurred throughout both years, none of which were individually material.



86



Net cash used in investing activities changed in the period-to-period comparison primarily due to the following items:

On April 30, 2010, CONSOL Energy paid $3.474 billion for the Dominion Acquisition. See Note 2—Acquisitions and Dispositions, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-Q for additional details.

On May 28, 2010, CONSOL Energy paid $991 million to acquire the shares of CNX Gas common stock and vested stock options which it did not previously own.

On September 30, 2011, CONSOL Energy received net proceeds of $519 million related to the Noble transaction. See Note 2—Acquisitions and Dispositions, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-Q for additional details.

On September 30, 2011, CONSOL Energy received a $67 million cash distribution from CONE Gathering LLC. See Note 2—Acquisitions and Dispositions, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-Q for additional details.

Total capital expenditures increased $176 million to $997 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $822 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Capital expenditures for the gas segment increased $243 million due to the additional drilling in the period-to-period comparison. The increased gas segment capital was primarily due to the increased Marcellus Shale drilling. Capital expenditures for coal and other activities decreased $67 million in the period-to-period comparison. Face extension projects at various locations were lower by $83 million as a result of the majority of these projects being completed during the 2010 period, $13 million was incurred in the 2010 period as a result of a longwall shield lease buyout, and the 2011 period was lower by approximately $29 million related to the Buchanan Reverse Osmosis (RO) system which was primarily completed before January 1, 2011 and an approximate $18 million decrease in 2011 related to various other equipment expenditures throughout both periods. These reductions in coal and other capital were offset, in part by an approximate $61 million increase in expenditures related primarily to the ongoing development of the BMX Mine which is scheduled to go on-line in 2014, and a $15 million increase in 2011 related to the construction of the Northern West Virginia RO system.

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities changed in the period-to-period comparison primarily due to the following items:
Proceeds of $2.75 billion were received on April 1, 2010 in connection with the issuance of $1.5 billion of 8.00% senior unsecured notes due in 2017 and $1.25 billion of 8.25% senior unsecured notes due in 2020.
In 2010, proceeds of $1.83 billion were received in connection with the issuance of 44.3 million shares of common stock which was completed on March 31, 2010.
In 2011, CONSOL Energy repaid $200 million of borrowings under the accounts receivable securitization facility. In 2010, CONSOL Energy received proceeds of $150 million under this facility.
In 2011, CONSOL Energy paid $266 million, including a make-whole provision, to redeem the 7.875% notes that were due in March 2012.
In 2011, CONSOL Energy paid $15 million related to the solicitation of consents from the holders of CONSOL Energy's outstanding 8.00% Senior Notes due 2017, 8.25% Senior Notes due 2020, and 6.375% Senior Notes due 2021. See Note 10—Long-Term Debt, in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-Q for additional details.
In 2011, CONSOL Energy paid outstanding borrowings of $155 million under the revolving credit facility. In 2010, CONSOL Energy paid $279 million under this facility.
Dividends of $68 million were paid in 2011 compared to $63 million in 2010. The increase was due to the 44.3 million additional shares issued on March 31, 2010.
In 2011, proceeds of $250 million were received in connection with the issuance of $250 million of 6.375% senior unsecured notes due in March 2021.
In 2011, CNX Gas, a wholly-owned subsidiary, paid outstanding borrowings of $129 million under its revolving credit facility compared to receiving $20 million in 2010.




87



The following is a summary of our significant contractual obligations at September 30, 2011 (in thousands):
 
 
Payments due by Year
 
Less Than
1 Year
 
1-3 Years
 
3-5 Years
 
More Than
5 Years
 
Total
Purchase Order Firm Commitments
$
174,979

 
$
129,553

 
$
7,094

 
$

 
$
311,626

Gas Firm Transportation
49,937

 
136,358

 
130,444

 
466,646

 
783,385

CONE Gathering Commitments
3,400

 
78,000

 
251,300

 
1,389,100

 
1,721,800

Long-Term Debt
11,718

 
6,517

 
5,173

 
3,111,744

 
3,135,152

Interest on Long-Term Debt
244,977

 
490,743

 
491,730

 
667,328

 
1,894,778

Capital (Finance) Lease Obligations
8,588

 
13,845

 
10,226

 
31,227

 
63,886

Interest on Capital (Finance) Lease Obligations
4,275

 
6,925

 
5,374

 
6,279

 
22,853

Operating Lease Obligations
89,379

 
143,291

 
102,069

 
130,724

 
465,463

Long-Term Liabilities—Employee Related (a)
230,132

 
484,762

 
521,037

 
2,444,423

 
3,680,354

Other Long-Term Liabilities (b)
393,548

 
137,498

 
73,573

 
410,486

 
1,015,105

Total Contractual Obligations (c)
$
1,210,933

 
$
1,627,492

 
$
1,598,020

 
$
8,657,957

 
$
13,094,402

 _________________________
(a)
Long-term liabilities—employee related include other post-employment benefits, work-related injuries and illnesses. Estimated salaried retirement contributions required to meet minimum funding standards under ERISA are excluded from the pay-out table due to the uncertainty regarding amounts to be contributed. Estimated 2011 contributions are expected to approximate $ 71.7 million.

(b)
Other long-term liabilities include mine reclamation and closure and other long-term liability costs.
(c)
The significant obligation table does not include obligations to taxing authorities due to the uncertainty surrounding the ultimate settlement of amounts and timing of these obligations.

Debt
At September 30, 2011 , CONSOL Energy had total long-term debt of $3.199 billion outstanding, including the current portion of long-term debt of $20 million. This long-term debt consisted of:
An aggregate principal amount of $ 1.5 billion of 8.00% senior unsecured notes due in April 2017. Interest on the notes is payable April 1 and October 1 of each year. Payment of the principal and interest on the notes are guaranteed by most of CONSOL Energy’s subsidiaries.
An aggregate principal amount of $ 1.25 billion of 8.25% senior unsecured notes due in April 2020. Interest on the notes is payable April 1 and October 1 of each year. Payment of the principal and interest on the notes are guaranteed by most of CONSOL Energy’s subsidiaries.
An aggregate principal amount of $ 250 million of 6.375% notes due in March 2021. Interest on the notes is payable March 1 and September 1 of each year. Payment of the principal and interest on the notes are guaranteed by most of CONSOL Energy's subsidiaries.
An aggregate principal amount of $ 103 million of industrial revenue bonds which were issued to finance the Baltimore port facility and bear interest at 5.75% per annum and mature in September 2025. Interest on the industrial revenue bonds is payable March 1 and September 1 of each year.
$ 32 million in advance royalty commitments with an average interest rate of 7.56%  per annum.
An aggregate principal amount of $ 64 million of capital leases with a weighted average interest rate of 6.46%  per annum.
At September 30, 2011 , CONSOL Energy also had no outstanding borrowings and had approximately $ 265,173 of letters of credit outstanding under the $1.5 billion senior secured revolving credit facility.
At September 30, 2011 , CONSOL Energy had no outstanding borrowings under the accounts receivable securitization facility.


88



At September 30, 2011 , CNX Gas, a wholly owned subsidiary, had no outstanding borrowings and approximately $ 70,203 of letters of credit outstanding under its $1.0 billion secured revolving credit facility.
Total Equity and Dividends
CONSOL Energy had total equity of $ 3.4 billion at September 30, 2011 and $ 2.9 billion at December 31, 2010 . Total equity increased primarily due to net income attributable to CONSOL Energy shareholders, proceeds received under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges and the amortization of stock-based compensation awards. Approximately $7.8 million of proceeds were received under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act related to reimbursements from the Federal government for retiree health spending which are reflected in Other Comprehensive Income. There is no guarantee that additional proceeds will be received under this program. These increases were offset, in part, by the declaration of dividends and the issuance of treasury stock. See the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q for additional details.
Dividend information for the current year to date were as follows:
 
Declaration Date
 
Amount Per Share
 
Record Date
 
Payment Date
October 27, 2011
 
$
0.125

 
November 11, 2011
 
November 25, 2011
July 29, 2011
 
$
0.100

 
August 10, 2011
 
August 22, 2011
April 29, 2011
 
$
0.100

 
May 13, 2011
 
May 24, 2011
January 28, 2011
 
$
0.100

 
February 8, 2011
 
February 18, 2011

On October 27, 2011, CONSOL Energy's Board of Directors increased the regular annual dividend by 25%, or $0.10 per share, to $0.50 per share, effective immediately.
The declaration and payment of dividends by CONSOL Energy is subject to the discretion of CONSOL Energy’s Board of Directors, and no assurance can be given that CONSOL Energy will pay dividends in the future. CONSOL Energy’s Board of Directors determines whether dividends will be paid quarterly. The determination to pay dividends will depend upon, among other things, general business conditions, CONSOL Energy’s financial results, contractual and legal restrictions regarding the payment of dividends by CONSOL Energy, planned investments by CONSOL Energy and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant. Our credit facility limits our ability to pay dividends in excess of an annual rate of $0.40 per share when our leverage ratio exceeds 4.50 to 1.00 or our availability is less than or equal to $100 million. The leverage ratio was 2.17 to 1.00 and our availability was approximately $ 1.2 billion at September 30, 2011 . The credit facility does not permit dividend payments in the event of default. The indentures to the 2017, 2020 and 2021 notes limit dividends to $0.40 per share annually unless several conditions are met. Conditions include no defaults, ability to incur additional debt and other payment limitations under the indentures. There were no defaults in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 .
Off-Balance Sheet Transactions
CONSOL Energy does not maintain off-balance sheet transactions, arrangements, obligations or other relationships with unconsolidated entities or others that are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on CONSOL Energy’s financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources which are not disclosed in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements. CONSOL Energy participates in various multi-employer benefit plans such as the United Mine Workers’ of America (UMWA) 1974 Pension Plan, the UMWA Combined Benefit Fund and the UMWA 1993 Benefit Plan which generally accepted accounting principles recognize on a pay as you go basis. These benefit arrangements may result in additional liabilities that are not recognized on the balance sheet at September 30, 2011 . The various multi-employer benefit plans are discussed in Note 17—Other Employee Benefit Plans in the Notes to the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of the December 31, 2010 Form 10-K. CONSOL Energy also uses a combination of surety bonds, corporate guarantees and letters of credit to secure our financial obligations for employee-related, environmental, performance and various other items which are not reflected on the balance sheet at September 30, 2011 . Management believes these items will expire without being funded. See Note 11—Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q for additional details of the various financial guarantees that have been issued by CONSOL Energy.


89





Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued an update to the Compensation-Retirement Benefits-Multiemployer Plans Subtopic 715-80 of the Accounting Standards Codification which is intended to provide financial statement users with more information to assess the potential future cash flow implications relating to an employer's participation in multiemployer pension plans. The required additional disclosures will also indicate the financial health of all of the significant plans in which the employer participates and assist a financial statement user to access additional information that is available outside the financial statements. The effective date of this update is December 15, 2011 with early adoption permitted. We believe adoption of this new guidance will not have a material impact on CONSOL Energy's financial statements as this update has an impact on presentation only.

In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued an update to the Comprehensive Income Topic of the Accounting Standards Codification intended to improve the comparability, consistency, and transparency of financial reporting and to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income. This update eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity, requires consecutive presentation of the statement of net income and other comprehensive income, and requires an entity to present reclassification adjustments on the face of the financial statements from other comprehensive income (OCI) to net income. The effective date of this update is December 15, 2011 with early adoption permitted. We believe adoption of this new guidance will not have a material impact on CONSOL's financial statements as these updates have an impact on presentation only.

Forward-Looking Statements
We are including the following cautionary statement in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to make applicable and take advantage of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 for any forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf, of us. With the exception of historical matters, the matters discussed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements (as defined in Section 21E of the Exchange Act) that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from projected results. Accordingly, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results. The forward-looking statements may include projections and estimates concerning the timing and success of specific projects and our future production, revenues, income and capital spending. When we use the words “believe,” “intend,” “expect,” “may,” “should,” “anticipate,” “could,” “estimate,” “plan,” “predict,” “project,” or their negatives, or other similar expressions, the statements which include those words are usually forward-looking statements. When we describe strategy that involves risks or uncertainties, we are making forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q; we disclaim any obligation to update these statements unless required by securities law, and we caution you not to rely on them unduly. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and assumptions about future events. While our management considers these expectations and assumptions to be reasonable, they are inherently subject to significant business, economic, competitive, regulatory and other risks, contingencies and uncertainties, most of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control. These risks, contingencies and uncertainties relate to, among other matters, the following:
deterioration in economic conditions in any of the industries in which our customers operate, or sustained uncertainty in financial markets cause conditions we cannot predict;
an extended decline in prices we receive for our coal and gas affecting our operating results and cash flows;
our customers extending existing contracts or entering into new long-term contracts for coal;
our reliance on major customers;
our inability to collect payments from customers if their creditworthiness declines;
the disruption of rail, barge, gathering, processing and transportation facilities and other systems that deliver our coal and gas to market;
a loss of our competitive position because of the competitive nature of the coal and gas industries, or a loss of our competitive position because of overcapacity in these industries impairing our profitability;
our inability to maintain satisfactory labor relations;


90



coal users switching to other fuels in order to comply with various environmental standards related to coal combustion emissions;
the impact of potential, as well as any adopted regulations relating to greenhouse gas emissions on the demand for coal and natural gas, as well as the impact of any adopted regulations on our coal mining operations due to the venting of coalbed methane which occurs during mining;
foreign currency fluctuations could adversely affect the competitiveness of our coal abroad;
the risks inherent in coal and gas operations being subject to unexpected disruptions, including geological conditions, equipment failure, timing of completion of significant construction or repair of equipment, fires, explosions, accidents and weather conditions which could impact financial results;
our focus on new gas development projects and exploration for gas in areas where we have little or no proven gas reserves;
decreases in the availability of, or increases in, the price of commodities and services used in our mining and gas operations, as well as our exposure under “take or pay” contracts we entered into with well service providers to obtain services which if not used could impact our cost of production;
obtaining and renewing governmental permits and approvals for our coal and gas operations;
the effects of government regulation on the discharge into the water or air, and the disposal and clean-up of, hazardous substances and wastes generated during our coal and gas operations;
the effects of stringent federal and state employee health and safety regulations, including the ability of regulators to shut down a mine or well;
the potential for liabilities arising from environmental contamination or alleged environmental contamination in connection with our past or current coal and gas operations;
the effects of mine closing, reclamation, gas well closing and certain other liabilities;
uncertainties in estimating our economically recoverable coal and gas reserves;
costs associated with perfecting title for coal or gas rights on some of our properties;
the outcomes of various legal proceedings, which are more fully described in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
the impacts of various asbestos litigation claims;
increased exposure to employee related long-term liabilities;
increased exposure to multi-employer pension plan liabilities;
minimum funding requirements by the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (the Pension Act) coupled with the significant investment and plan asset losses suffered during the recent economic decline has exposed us to making additional required cash contributions to fund the pension benefit plans which we sponsor and the multi-employer pension benefit plans in which we participate;
lump sum payments made to retiring salaried employees pursuant to our defined benefit pension plan exceeding total service and interest cost in a plan year;
acquisitions and joint ventures that we recently have completed or entered into or may make in the future including the accuracy of our assessment of the acquired businesses and their risks, achieving any anticipated synergies or other benefits (including joint venture partners paying carry obligations), integrating the acquisitions and unanticipated changes that could affect assumptions we may have made and divestitures we anticipate may not occur or produce anticipated proceeds;
the anti-takeover effects of our rights plan could prevent a change of control;
increased exposure on our financial performance due to the degree we are leveraged;
replacing our natural gas reserves, which if not replaced, will cause our gas reserves and gas production to decline;
our ability to acquire water supplies needed for gas drilling, or our ability to dispose of water used or removed from strata


91



in connection with our gas operations at a reasonable cost and within applicable environmental rules;
our hedging activities may prevent us from benefiting from price increases and may expose us to other risks;
other factors discussed in our 2010 Form 10-K under “Risk Factors,” as updated by any subsequent Form 10-Qs, which are on file at the Securities and Exchange Commission.

ITEM 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
In addition to the risks inherent in operations, CONSOL Energy is exposed to financial, market, political and economic risks. The following discussion provides additional detail regarding CONSOL Energy's exposure to the risks of changing commodity prices, interest rates and foreign exchange rates.
CONSOL Energy is exposed to market price risk in the normal course of selling natural gas production and to a lesser extent in the sale of coal. CONSOL Energy sells coal under both short-term and long-term contracts with fixed price and/or indexed price contracts that reflect market value. CONSOL Energy uses fixed-price contracts, collar-price contracts and derivative commodity instruments that qualify as cash-flow hedges under the Derivatives and Hedging Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification to minimize exposure to market price volatility in the sale of natural gas. Our risk management policy prohibits the use of derivatives for speculative purposes.
CONSOL Energy has established risk management policies and procedures to strengthen the internal control environment of the marketing of commodities produced from its asset base. All of the derivative instruments without other risk assessment procedures are held for purposes other than trading. They are used primarily to mitigate uncertainty, volatility and cover underlying exposures. CONSOL Energy's market risk strategy incorporates fundamental risk management tools to assess market price risk and establish a framework in which management can maintain a portfolio of transactions within pre-defined risk parameters.
CONSOL Energy believes that the use of derivative instruments, along with our risk assessment procedures and internal controls, mitigates our exposure to material risks. However, the use of derivative instruments without other risk assessment procedures could materially affect CONSOL Energy's results of operations depending on market prices. Nevertheless, we believe that use of these instruments will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position or liquidity.
For a summary of accounting policies related to derivative instruments, see Note 1—Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of CONSOL Energy's 2010 Form 10-K.
A sensitivity analysis has been performed to determine the incremental effect on future earnings, related to open derivative instruments at September 30, 2011 . A hypothetical 10 percent decrease in future natural gas prices would increase future earnings related to derivatives by $48.5 million. Similarly, a hypothetical 10 percent increase in future natural gas prices would decrease future earnings related to derivatives by $48.5 million.
CONSOL Energy’s interest expense is sensitive to changes in the general level of interest rates in the United States. At September 30, 2011 , CONSOL Energy had $3,199 million aggregate principal amount of debt outstanding under fixed-rate instruments and no debt outstanding under variable-rate instruments. CONSOL Energy’s primary exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates to our revolving credit facility, under which there were no borrowings outstanding at September 30, 2011 . CONSOL Energy’s revolving credit facility bore interest at a weighted average rate of 4.07% per annum during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 . A 100 basis-point increase in the average rate for CONSOL Energy’s revolving credit facility would not have significantly decreased net income for the period. CNX Gas, also had borrowings during the period under its revolving credit facility which bears interest at a variable rate. CNX Gas’ facility had no outstanding borrowings at September 30, 2011 and bore interest at a weighted average rate of 2.08% per annum during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 . Due to the level of borrowings against this facility and the low weighted average interest rate in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 , a 100 basis-point increase in the average rate for CNX Gas’ revolving credit facility would not have significantly decreased net income for the period.
Almost all of CONSOL Energy’s transactions are denominated in U.S. dollars, and, as a result, it does not have material exposure to currency exchange-rate risks.



92



Hedging Volumes
As of October 24, 2011 our hedged volumes for the periods indicated are as follows:
 
 
For the Three Months Ended
 
 
 
March 31,
 
June 30,
 
September 30,
 
December 31,
 
Total Year
2011 Fixed Price Volumes
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hedged Mcf
13,035,790

 
23,069,925

 
23,948,795

 
23,948,795

 
84,003,305

Weighted Average Hedge Price/Mcf
$
5.56

 
$
5.14

 
$
5.12

 
$
5.18

 
$
5.21

2012 Fixed Price Volumes
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hedged Mcf
19,108,632

 
19,108,632

 
19,318,617

 
19,318,617

 
76,854,498

Weighted Average Hedge Price/Mcf
$
5.25

 
$
5.25

 
$
5.25

 
$
5.25

 
$
5.25

2013 Fixed Price Volumes
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hedged Mcf
11,585,912

 
11,714,644

 
11,843,376

 
11,843,376

 
46,987,308

Weighted Average Hedge Price/Mcf
$
5.19

 
$
5.19

 
$
5.19

 
$
5.19

 
$
5.19

2014 Fixed Price Volumes
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hedged Mcf
9,921,990

 
10,032,234

 
10,142,478

 
10,142,478

 
40,239,180

Weighted Average Hedge Price/Mcf
$
5.34

 
$
5.34

 
$
5.34

 
$
5.34

 
$
5.34


ITEM 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure controls and procedures. CONSOL Energy, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including CONSOL Energy’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on that evaluation, CONSOL Energy’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of September 30, 2011 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by CONSOL Energy in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and includes controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by CONSOL Energy in such reports is accumulated and communicated to CONSOL Energy’s management, including CONSOL Energy’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in internal controls over financial reporting . There were no changes in the Company's internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.



93



PART II
OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The first through the twenty-fourth paragraphs of Note 11—Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q are incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS
The following risk factors are updated from our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Our coal mining and gas operations are subject to operating risks, which could increase our operating expenses and decrease our production levels which could adversely affect our results of operations. Our coal and gas operations are also subject to hazards and any losses or liabilities we suffer from hazards which occur in our operations may not be fully covered by our insurance policies.

Our coal mining operations are predominantly underground mines. These mines are subject to a number of operating risks that could disrupt operations, decrease production and increase the cost of mining at particular mines for varying lengths of time thereby adversely affecting our operating results. In addition, if coal production declines, we may not be able to produce sufficient amounts of coal to deliver under our long-term coal contracts. CONSOL Energy's inability to satisfy contractual obligations could result in our customers initiating claims against us. The operating risks that may have a significant impact on our coal operations include:
variations in thickness of the layer, or seam, of coal;
amounts of rock and other natural materials intruding into the coal seam and other geological conditions that could affect the stability of the roof and the side walls of the mine;
equipment failures or repairs;
fires, explosions or other accidents;
weather conditions; and
security breaches or terroristic acts.

Our exploration for and production of natural gas also involves numerous operating risks. The cost of drilling, completing and operating wells for coalbed methane (CBM) or other gas is often uncertain, and a number of factors can delay or prevent drilling operations, decrease production and/or increase the cost of our gas operations at particular sites for varying lengths of time thereby adversely affecting our operating results. The operating risks that may have a significant impact on our gas operations include:
unexpected drilling conditions;
title problems;
pressure or irregularities in geologic formations;
equipment failures or repairs;
fires, explosions or other accidents;
adverse weather conditions;
reductions in natural gas prices;
security breaches or terroristic acts;
pipeline ruptures;
surface spillage of, or contamination of groundwater by, fracturing fluids used in hydraulic fracturing operations; and
unavailability or high cost of drilling rigs, other field services and equipment.

Although we maintain insurance for a number of hazards, we may not be insured or fully insured against the losses or liabilities that could arise from a significant accident in our coal or gas operations.


94



Existing and future government laws, regulations and other legal requirements relating to protection of the environment, health and safety matters and others that govern our business have increased our costs of doing business for both coal and gas, and may restrict both our coal and gas operations.

We are subject to laws, regulations and other legal requirements enacted or adopted by federal, state and local, as well as foreign authorities relating to protection of the environment and health and safety matters. These include those legal requirements that govern discharges of substances into the air and water, the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, the cleanup of contaminated sites, groundwater quality and availability, plant and wildlife protection, reclamation and restoration of mining or drilling properties after mining or drilling is completed, the installation of various safety equipment in our mines, control of surface subsidence from underground mining and work practices related to employee health and safety. Complying with these requirements, including the terms of our permits, has had, and will continue to have, a significant effect on our costs of operations and competitive position. For example, we have agreed to commence operation by May 30, 2013 of a new advanced waste water treatment plant to treat the discharge of mine water from our Blacksville #2, Loveridge and Robinson Run mines at a total estimated cost of approximately $200 million. In addition, we could incur substantial costs as a result of violations under environmental and health and safety laws. Any additional laws, regulations and other legal requirements enacted or adopted by federal, state and local, as well as foreign authorities or new interpretations of existing legal requirements by regulatory bodies relating to the protection of the environment and health and safety matters could further affect our costs of operations and competitive position.

For example, the federal Clean Water Act and corresponding state laws affect coal mining and gas operations by imposing restrictions on discharges into regulated surface waters. Permits requiring regular monitoring and compliance with effluent limitations and reporting requirements govern the discharge of pollutants into regulated waters. The Clean Water Act and corresponding state laws (including those relating to protection of "impaired waters" (not meeting state water quality standards) through the use of effluent limitations established so that all discharges to the "impaired" stream do not exceed Total Maximum Daily Load ("TMDL") levels of the pollutants causing the impairment; anti-degradation regulations which protect state designated "high quality/exceptional use" streams by restricting or prohibiting "discharges" which result in degradation; and requirements to treat discharges from coal mining properties for non-traditional pollutants requiring expensive treatment technologies, such as total dissolved solids, chlorides and selenium; and "protecting" streams, wetlands, other regulated water sources and associated riparian lands from the surface impacts of underground mining) may cause CONSOL Energy to incur additional costs that could adversely affect our operating results, financial condition and cash flows or may prevent us from being able to mine portions of our reserves. The Clean Water Act is being used by opponents of mountain top removal mining as a means to challenge permits. Also, beginning in early 2009, the EPA has relied upon the Clean Water Act to become more actively involved in the permitting of mountain top removal mining operations and other coal mining operations requiring permits to place fill material in streams. In addition, CONSOL Energy incurs and will continue to incur costs associated with the investigation and remediation of environmental contamination under the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (Superfund) and similar state statutes and has been named as a potentially responsible party at Superfund sites in the past.

State and local authorities regulate various aspects of gas drilling and production activities, including the drilling of wells (through permit and bonding requirements), the spacing of wells, the unitization or pooling of gas properties, environmental matters, safety standards, market sharing and well site restoration. If we fail to comply with statutes and regulations, we may be subject to penalties, which would decrease our profitability.

Additionally, regulations applicable to the gas industry are under constant review for amendment or expansion. Any future changes may affect, among other things, the pricing or marketing of gas production. For example, hydraulic fracturing is an important and common practice that is used to stimulate production of hydrocarbons, particularly natural gas, from tight formations such as Marcellus shale. The process involves the injection of water, sand and chemicals under pressure into formations to fracture the surrounding rock and stimulate production. The process is typically regulated by state oil and gas commissions. The EPA has commenced a study of the potential environmental impacts of hydraulic fracturing activities, with results of the study anticipated to be available by late 2012. Other federal agencies are also examining hydraulic fracturing, including the U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”), the U.S. Government Accountability Office and the White House Council for Environmental Quality. The U.S. Department of the Interior is also considering regulation of hydraulic fracturing activities on public lands. In addition, legislation has been introduced in Congress to provide for federal regulation of hydraulic fracturing and to require disclosure of the chemicals used in the fracturing process. Also, some states have adopted, and other states are considering adopting, regulations that could restrict or impose additional requirements relating to hydraulic fracturing in certain circumstances. For example, on June 17, 2011, Texas enacted a law that requires the disclosure of information regarding the substances used in the hydraulic fracturing process to the Railroad Commission of Texas (the entity that regulates


95



oil and natural gas production) and the public. Such federal or state legislation could require the disclosure of chemical constituents used in the fracturing process to state or federal regulatory authorities who could then make such information publicly available. Disclosure of chemicals used in the fracturing process could make it easier for third parties opposing hydraulic fracturing to initiate legal proceedings against producers and service providers based on allegations that specific chemicals used in the fracturing process could adversely affect groundwater. In addition, if hydraulic fracturing is regulated at the federal level, our fracturing activities could become subject to additional permit requirements or operational restrictions and also to associated permitting delays and potential increases in costs. Further, some state and local governments in the Marcellus Shale region in Pennsylvania and New York have considered or imposed temporary moratorium on drilling operations using hydraulic fracturing until further study of the potential for environmental and human health impacts by the EPA or the relevant agencies are completed. No assurance can be given as to whether or not similar measures might be considered or implemented in other jurisdictions in which our gas properties are located. If new laws or regulations that significantly restrict or otherwise impact hydraulic fracturing are passed by Congress or adopted in states in which we operate, such legal requirements could make it more difficult or costly for us to perform hydraulic fracturing activities and thereby could affect the determination of whether a well is commercially viable. In addition, restrictions on hydraulic fracturing could reduce the amount of oil and natural gas that we ultimately are able to produce in commercially paying quantities from our gas properties.
We may incur additional costs and delays to produce coal and gas because we have to acquire additional property rights to perfect our title to coal or gas rights.
While chain of title for our coal estate generally has been established, there may be defects in it that we do not realize until we have committed to developing those properties or coal reserves. As such, the title to the coal estate that we intend to mine may contain defects. In order to conduct our mining operations on properties where these defects exist, we may incur unanticipated costs perfecting title.
Some of the gas rights we believe we control are in areas where we have not yet done any exploratory or production drilling. Many of these properties were acquired primarily for the coal rights, and, in many cases were acquired years ago. While chain of title work for the coal estate was generally established, in some cases, the gas estate title work is less developed. Our practice is to perform a thorough title examination of the gas estate before we commence drilling activities and to acquire any additional rights needed to perfect our ownership of the gas estate for development and production purposes. We may incur substantial costs to acquire these additional property rights and the acquisition of the necessary rights may not be feasible in some cases. Our inability to obtain these rights may adversely impact our ability to develop those properties. Some states permit us to produce the gas without perfected ownership under an administrative process known as “pooling,” which require us to give notice to all potential claimants and pay royalties into escrow until the undetermined rights are resolved. As a result, we may have to pay royalties to produce gas on acreage that we control and these costs may be material. Further, the pooling process is time-consuming and may delay our drilling program in the affected areas.
In confirming title to the gas estate in Pennsylvania, we rely upon long standing Pennsylvania Supreme Court decisions. A recent decision by the intermediate appellate court in Pennsylvania in a case captioned Butler v. Powers (Pa. Superior Ct., No. 1795 MDA 2010) did not change the law of Pennsylvania, but in remanding the case to the trial court for further proceedings, it called into question the applicability of a long-standing presumption known as the Dunham Rule to gas in the Marcellus Shale. The Dunham Rule is a presumption that a reservation or conveyance of minerals does not transfer the ownership of oil and gas absent an express reference to oil and gas. While we believe that the Pennsylvania courts will ultimately confirm that the Dunham Rule applies to Marcellus Shale gas, if the Pennsylvania courts were to hold otherwise, we could be exposed to lawsuits challenging our rights to Marcellus Shale gas in some of our Pennsylvania properties where our rights derive from persons who did not also own the mineral rights and we may have to incur substantial additional costs to perfect our gas title in those Pennsylvania properties.

Acquisitions that we have completed, acquisitions that we may undertake in the future, as well as expanding existing company mines, involve a number of risks, any of which could cause us not to realize the anticipated benefits and to the extent we engage in divestitures or joint ventures, we do not control the timing of these and they may not provide anticipated benefits.

On April 30, 2010 we completed the Dominion Acquisition for approximately $3.5 billion. We could encounter difficulties with the Dominion Acquisition, such as the need to revisit assumptions about gas reserves, future gas production, revenues, capital expenditures and operating costs, including realizing anticipated synergies, the loss of key employees or commercial relationships or the need to address unanticipated liabilities. If we cannot successfully integrate our business, we may fail to realize the expected benefits of the acquisition. We also continually seek to grow our business by adding and developing coal and gas reserves through acquisitions and by expanding the production at existing mines and existing gas operations. If we are unable to successfully integrate the companies, businesses or properties we acquire, our profitability may


96



decline and we could experience an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations. Mine expansion, gas operation expansion and acquisition transactions involve various inherent risks, including:

uncertainties in assessing the value, strengths, and potential profitability of, and identifying the extent of all weaknesses, risks, contingent and other liabilities (including environmental liabilities) of expansion and acquisition opportunities;
the potential loss of key customers, management and employees of an acquired business;
the ability to achieve identified operating and financial synergies anticipated to result from an expansion or an acquisition opportunity;
problems that could arise from the integration of the acquired business;
unanticipated changes in business, industry or general economic conditions that affect the assumptions underlying our rationale for pursuing the expansion of the acquisition opportunity; and
we may have to assume cleanup or reclamation obligations or other unanticipated liabilities in connection with these acquisitions.

From time to time part of our business and financing plans include entering into joint venture arrangements and the divestiture of certain assets. However, we do not control the timing of divestitures or joint venture arrangements and delays in entering into divestitures or joint venture arrangements may reduce the benefits from them. In addition, the terms of divestitures and joint venture arrangements may make a substantial portion of the benefits we anticipate receiving from these to be subject to future matters that we do not control. For example, we sold a 50% undivided interest in certain Marcellus shale acreage to Noble Energy Corporation and entered into a joint development agreement with it regarding the development of this acreage. Of the approximately $3.3 billion we anticipate receiving, approximately $2.1 billion depends upon Noble Energy paying during a specified period of time a portion of our share of drilling and development costs for new wells, which we call “carried costs”. In addition, Noble Energy's obligation to pay carried costs is suspended if average natural gas prices fall and remain below $4.00 per million British thermal units or “MMBtu” in any three consecutive month period and will remain suspended until average natural gas prices are above $4.00/MMBtu for three consecutive months. We entered into a similar transaction with Hess Corporation in which approximately $534 million of the total anticipated consideration of $593 million is dependent upon Hess paying carried costs. If for any reason the number of new wells drilled during the relevant term under one of these arrangements is significantly less than we anticipate, or the obligation to pay carried costs is suspended for a significant period of time in the case of the Noble Energy arrangement, the amount of carried costs paid by the other party would be less than we anticipate and we would not realize the expected economic benefit from these arrangements.


97






ITEM 5.
OTHER INFORMATION
Mine Safety and Health Administration Safety Data
We believe that CONSOL Energy is one of the safest mining companies in the world. The Company has in place health and safety programs that include extensive employee training, accident prevention, workplace inspection, emergency response, accident investigation, regulatory compliance and program auditing. The objectives of our health and safety programs are to eliminate workplace incidents, comply with all mining-related regulations and provide support for both regulators and the industry to improve mine safety.
The operation of our mines is subject to regulation by the federal Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine Act). MSHA inspects our mines on a regular basis and issues various citations and orders when it believes a violation has occurred under the Mine Act. We present information below regarding certain mining safety and health citations which MSHA has issued with respect to our coal mining operations. In evaluating this information, consideration should be given to factors such as: (i) the number of citations and orders will vary depending on the size of the coal mine, (ii) the number of citations issued will vary from inspector to inspector and mine to mine, and (iii) citations and orders can be contested and appealed, and in that process, are often reduced in severity and amount, and are sometimes dismissed.
During the three months ended September 30, 2011 , neither CONSOL Energy’s mining complexes nor its closed and/or idled mines: (i) were assessed any Mine Act section 110(b)(2) penalties for failure to correct the subject matter of a Mine Act section 104(a) citation within the specified time period, which failure was deemed flagrant (i.e., a reckless or repeated failure to make reasonable efforts to eliminate a known violation that substantially and proximately caused, or reasonably could have been expected to cause, death or serious bodily injury) or (ii) received any MSHA written notices under Mine Act section 104(e) of a pattern of violation of mandatory health or safety standards or of the potential to have such a pattern. There was one Mine Act section 107(a) imminent danger orders to immediately remove miners. There was one pending legal action before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (excluding actions pending before Administrative Law Judges). There were no fatalities during the three months ended September 30, 2011 .
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 , neither CONSOL Energy’s mining complexes nor its closed and/or idled mines: (i) were assessed any Mine Act section 110(b)(2) penalties for failure to correct the subject matter of a Mine Act section 104(a) citation within the specified time period, which failure was deemed flagrant (i.e., a reckless or repeated failure to make reasonable efforts to eliminate a known violation that substantially and proximately caused, or reasonably could have been expected to cause, death or serious bodily injury) or (ii) received any MSHA written notices under Mine Act section 104(e) of a pattern of violation of mandatory health or safety standards or of the potential to have such a pattern. There were two Mine Act section 107(a) imminent danger orders to immediately remove miners. There was one pending legal action before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (excluding actions pending before Administrative Law Judges). There were no fatalities during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 .



98



The table below sets forth by mining complex the total number of citations and/or orders issued by MSHA to CONSOL Energy and its subsidiaries under the indicated provisions of the Mine Act, together with the total dollar value of proposed MSHA assessments, received during the three months ended September 30, 2011 and legal actions pending before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, together with the Administrative Law Judges thereof, for each of our mining complexes.
 
Name of Mine or Mining Complex(1)(2)
Mine Act
Section 104
Significant &
Substantial
Citations(3)
 
Mine Act
Section
104(b)
Orders(4)
 
Mine Act
Section
104(d)
Citations &
Orders(5)
 
Total Dollar
Value of
Proposed
MSHA
Assessments(6)
(in thousands)
 
Number of
Legal Actions
Pending Before
the Federal
Mine Safety and
Health Review
Commission(7)
Amvest - Fola Complex
19

 

 

 
$
20

 
16

Bailey
8

 

 

 
$
28

 
9

Blacksville #2
56

 

 
1

 
$
226

 
11

Buchanan
47

 

 

 
$
720

 
23

Enlow Fork
9

 

 

 
$
33

 
5

Loveridge
77

 
2

 
2

 
$
459

 
7

McElroy
83

 

 
4

 
$
436

 
16

Miller Creek Complex
34

 

 

 
$
30

 
4

Robinson Run
26

 

 

 
$
175

 
15

Shoemaker
72

 

 

 
$
172

 
9

Other (Keystone Plant)

 

 

 
$

 

 __________________________
(1)
MSHA assigns an identification number to each coal mine and may or may not assign separate identification numbers to related facilities such as preparation plants. We are providing the information in the table by mining complex rather than MSHA identification number because that is how we manage and operate our coal mining business.
(2)
We have not included currently closed or idled mines in the above table. Our closed and/or idled mines received one Mine Act section 104 Significant & Substantial citations in the three months ended September 30, 2011 . Total proposed assessments were $102 in the three months ending September 30, 2011 . There were 13 legal actions in total pending before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission as of September 30, 2011 for our closed and/or idle mines. These actions may have been initiated in prior quarters.
(3)
Mine Act section 104(a) significant and substantial citations are for alleged violations of a mining safety standard or regulation where there exists a reasonable likelihood that the hazard contributed to or will result in an injury or illness of a reasonably serious nature.
(4)
Mine Act section 104(b) orders are for alleged failure to totally abate the subject matter of a Mine Act section 104(a) citation within the period specified in the citation.
(5)
Mine Act section 104(d) citations and orders are for an alleged unwarrantable failure (i.e. aggravated conduct constituting more than ordinary negligence) to comply with a mining safety standard or regulation.
(6)
Includes proposed MSHA assessments received during the three months ended September 30, 2011 for all alleged violations. MSHA assessments are not necessarily made in the same period as the citation occurs.
(7)
Includes all legal actions pending before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, together with the Administrative Law Judges thereof, for each of our mining complexes. These actions may have been initiated in prior quarters. All of the legal actions were initiated by us to contest citations, orders, or proposed assessments issued by MSHA, and if we are successful, may result in the reduction or dismissal of those citations, orders or assessments.



99



The table below sets forth by mining complex the total number of citations and/or orders issued by MSHA to CONSOL Energy and its subsidiaries under the indicated provisions of the Mine Act, together with the total dollar value of proposed MSHA assessments, received during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and legal actions pending before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, together with the Administrative Law Judges thereof, for each of our mining complexes.

Name of Mine or Mining Complex(1)(2)
Mine Act
Section 104
Significant &
Substantial
Citations(3)
 
Mine Act
Section
104(b)
Orders(4)
 
Mine Act
Section
104(d)
Citations &
Orders(5)
 
Total Dollar
Value of
Proposed
MSHA
Assessments(6)
(in thousands)
 
Number of
Legal Actions
Pending Before
the Federal
Mine Safety and
Health Review
Commission(7)
Amvest - Fola Complex
50

 

 
1

 
$
83

 
16

Bailey
34

 

 

 
$
216

 
9

Blacksville #2
155

 

 
4

 
$
705

 
11

Buchanan
118

 

 

 
$
1,029

 
23

Enlow Fork
32

 

 

 
$
59

 
5

Loveridge
220

 
3

 
10

 
$
1,007

 
7

McElroy
232

 

 
7

 
$
871

 
16

Miller Creek Complex
88

 

 

 
$
72

 
4

Robinson Run
110

 

 
2

 
$
778

 
15

Shoemaker
178

 

 
2

 
$
517

 
9

Other (Keystone Plant)
1

 

 

 
$
5

 

 __________________________
(1)
MSHA assigns an identification number to each coal mine and may or may not assign separate identification numbers to related facilities such as preparation plants. We are providing the information in the table by mining complex rather than MSHA identification number because that is how we manage and operate our coal mining business.
(2)
We have not included currently closed or idled mines in the above table. Our closed and/or idled mines received six Mine Act section 104 Significant & Substantial citations in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 . Total proposed assessments were $136 in the nine months ending September 30, 2011 . There were 13 legal actions in total pending before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission as of September 30, 2011 for our closed and/or idle mines. These actions may have been initiated in prior quarters.
(3)
Mine Act section 104(a) significant and substantial citations are for alleged violations of a mining safety standard or regulation where there exists a reasonable likelihood that the hazard contributed to or will result in an injury or illness of a reasonably serious nature.
(4)
Mine Act section 104(b) orders are for alleged failure to totally abate the subject matter of a Mine Act section 104(a) citation within the period specified in the citation.
(5)
Mine Act section 104(d) citations and orders are for an alleged unwarrantable failure (i.e. aggravated conduct constituting more than ordinary negligence) to comply with a mining safety standard or regulation.
(6)
Includes proposed MSHA assessments received during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 for all alleged violations. MSHA assessments are not necessarily made in the same period as the citation occurs.
(7)
Includes all legal actions pending before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, together with the Administrative Law Judges thereof, for each of our mining complexes. These actions may have been initiated in prior quarters. All of the legal actions were initiated by us to contest citations, orders, or proposed assessments issued by MSHA, and if we are successful, may result in the reduction or dismissal of those citations, orders or assessments.


100





ITEM 6.
EXHIBITS
2.1

 
Asset Acquisition Agreement dated August 17, 2011 between CNX Gas Company LLC and Noble Energy, Inc. (including Annex I (Definitions) thereto), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K filed on August 18, 2011. Schedules and Exhibits to the Asset Acquisition Agreement identified in the Table of Contents to the Asset Acquisition Agreement are not being filed but will be furnished supplementally to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
2.2

 
Joint Development Agreement by and among CNX Gas Company LLC and Noble Energy, Inc. dated as of September 30, 2011. Schedules and Exhibits to the Joint Development Agreement identified in the Table of Contents to the Joint Development Agreement are not being filed but will be furnished supplementally to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
4.1

 
Supplemental Indenture No. 3 dated as of August 24, 2011 to Indenture dated as of April 1, 2010 among CONSOL Energy Inc., certain subsidiaries of CONSOL Energy Inc. and The Bank of Nova Scotia Trust Company of New York, as trustee, with respect to the 8.00% Senior Notes due 2017, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on August 29, 2011.*
4.2

 
Supplemental Indenture No. 3 dated as of August 24, 2011 to Indenture dated as of April 1, 2010 among CONSOL Energy Inc., certain subsidiaries of CONSOL Energy Inc. and The Bank of Nova Scotia Trust Company of New York, as trustee, with respect to the 8.250% Senior Notes due 2020, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K filed on August 29, 2011.
4.3

 
Supplemental Indenture No. 1 dated as of August 24, 2011 to Indenture dated as of March 9, 2011 among CONSOL Energy Inc., certain subsidiaries of CONSOL Energy Inc. and The Bank of Nova Scotia Trust Company of New York, as trustee, with respect to the 6.375% Senior Notes due 2021, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed on August 29, 2011.
10.2

 
Closing Agreement by and between CNX Gas Company LLC and Noble Energy, Inc. dated as of September 30, 2011.
10.3

 
Amendment to CONSOL Energy Inc. Supplemental Retirement Plan dated October 17, 2011.
31.1

  
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2

  
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1

  
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2

  
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101

  
Interactive Data File (Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011 furnished in XBRL)
In accordance with SEC Release 33-8238, Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 are being furnished and not filed.

* The Asset Acquisition Agreement and Joint Development Agreement are not intended to be sources of financial, business or operational information about CONSOL Energy or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates or their assets. The representations, warranties and covenants contained in the these agreements are made solely for purposes of the respective agreement and are made as of their respective date; are solely for the benefit of the parties; may be subject to qualifications and limitations agreed upon by the parties in connection with negotiating the terms of these agreements, including being made for the purpose of allocating contractual risk between the parties instead of establishing matters as facts; and may be subject to standards of materiality applicable to the contracting parties that differ from those applicable to investors or security holders. Investors and security holders should not rely on the representations, warranties and covenants or any description thereof as characterizations of the actual state of facts or condition of CONSOL Energy or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates or their assets. Moreover, information concerning the subject matter of the representations, warranties and covenants may change after the date of these agreements, which subsequent information may or may not be fully reflected in public disclosures.



101



SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: October 31, 2011
 
 
CONSOL ENERGY INC.
 
 
 
 
 
By: 
 
/ S /    J. B RETT  H ARVEY        
 
 
 
J. Brett Harvey
 
 
 
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Executive Officer)
 
 
 
 
 
By: 
 
/ S /    W ILLIAM  J. L YONS        
 
 
 
William J. Lyons
 
 
 
Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President
(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
 


102
Exhibit 2.2









JOINT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BY AND AMONG



CNX GAS COMPANY LLC,
and
NOBLE ENERGY, INC.


DATED September 30, 2011













TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION..................................................................1
1.1
Defined Terms......................................................................................................1
1.2
References and Rules of Construction.................................................................      1
ARTICLE II SCOPE; PARTICIPATING INTERESTS; OPERATIONS........................................
2
2.1
Scope...................................................................................................................      2
2.2
Participating Interests..........................................................................................    2
2.3
Operations; Development Area...........................................................................    2
2.4
Operating Agreements.........................................................................................    3
2.5
Operator...............................................................................................................    5
2.6
Liability of Operator............................................................................................    6
2.7
Rentals, Shut-in Well Payments and Royalties...................................................    7
2.8
Insurance.............................................................................................................    7
2.9
Reports................................................................................................................    8
2.10
Marketing..........................................................................................................    9
2.11
Development Services; Overhead Rates; and Marketing Fees.........................    13
2.12
Contracts; Use of Affiliates...............................................................................    13
2.13
Non-Solicitation................................................................................................    14
2.14
Conflict of Interest Policy..................................................................................    14
2.15
Secondment.......................................................................................................    14
ARTICLE III JOINT DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE; DEVELOPMENT PLAN; ANNUAL PLANS AND BUDGETS................................................................      14
3.1
Joint Development Committee..........................................................................    14
3.2
Development Plan.............................................................................................    17
3.3
Annual Plan and Budgets..................................................................................    18
3.4
AFEs..................................................................................................................    22
3.5
Non-Consent Years............................................................................................    22
ARTICLE IV TRANSFER RESTRICTIONS...............................................................................
24
4.1
Restrictions on Transfer.....................................................................................    24
4.2
Documentation for Transfers.............................................................................    25
4.3
Maintenance of Uniform Interest......................................................................    26
4.4
Right of First Offer............................................................................................    26
ARTICLE V AREA OF MUTUAL INTEREST............................................................................
27
5.1
Creation of Area of Mutual Interest..................................................................    27
5.2
Acquisition of Fill-In Interests for Drilling Units in the Development Area....    27
5.3
Acquisition of Option Interests in the Development Area................................    28
5.4
Exceptions.........................................................................................................    29






ARTICLE VI TAXES....................................................................................................................
31
6.1
Tax Partnership..................................................................................................    31
6.2
Tax Information.................................................................................................    31
6.3
Responsibility for Taxes....................................................................................    31
ARTICLE VII CERTAIN PAYMENT OBLIGATIONS................................................................
32
7.1
Payment of Development Costs and Carried Costs..........................................    32
7.2
Payment Procedures..........................................................................................    32
7.3
Carried Costs Balance Payment........................................................................    33
7.4
Post Closing Cash Payments.............................................................................    33
7.5
Certain Order of Payments................................................................................    33
7.6
Total Cost Sharing Payments............................................................................    34
ARTICLE VIII DEFAULTS..........................................................................................................
34
8.1
Defaults.............................................................................................................    34
8.2
Certain Automatic Remedies for a Default.......................................................    35
8.3
Certain Other Remedies for a Default...............................................................    36
8.4
Cumulative and Additional Remedies...............................................................    36
ARTICLE IX LAND AND GEOSCIENCE DATA; DISCLAIMERS..........................................
37
9.1
Land and Geoscience Data................................................................................    37
9.2
Disclaimers........................................................................................................    37
ARTICLE X TERM.......................................................................................................................
38
10.1
Termination.......................................................................................................    38
10.2
Effect of Termination........................................................................................    38
ARTICLE XI MISCELLANEOUS...............................................................................................
38
11.1
Relationship of the Parties.................................................................................    38
11.2
Notices...............................................................................................................    39
11.3
Expenses............................................................................................................    41
11.4
Waivers; Rights Cumulative..............................................................................    41
11.5
Entire Agreement; Conflicts..............................................................................    41
11.6
Amendment.......................................................................................................    42
11.7
Governing Law; Disputes..................................................................................    42
11.8
Publicity.............................................................................................................43
11.9
Parties in Interest...............................................................................................    43
11.10
Successors and Permitted Assigns.....................................................................    43
11.11
Preparation of Agreement..................................................................................    43
11.12
Severability........................................................................................................    44
11.13
Counterparts......................................................................................................    44
11.14
Excluded Assets.................................................................................................    44





LIST OF APPENDICES AND EXHIBITS
Appendices
Appendix I      ¯      Definitions
Exhibits
Exhibit A-1      ¯      Development Area and Area of Mutual Interest
Exhibit A-2      ¯      CNX Operated Area
Exhibit A-3    ¯    NBL Operated Area
Exhibit B-1    ¯    Master JOA
Exhibit B-2    ¯    Noble Master JOA Memorandum
Exhibit B-3    ¯    CONSOL Master JOA Memorandum
Exhibit C    ¯    Insurance
Exhibit D-1    ¯    Unit JOA
Exhibit D-2    ¯    Noble Unit JOA Memorandum
Exhibit D-3    ¯    CONSOL Unit JOA Memorandum
Exhibit E    ¯    Development Plan
Exhibit F    ¯    Annual Plan and Budget
Exhibit G    ¯    Tax Partnership Agreement
Exhibit H    ¯    Marcellus Formation

Schedule
Schedule 2.3(c)    ¯    Expansion Counties
Schedule 2.10    ¯    Downstream Contracts and Hydrocarbon Sales Contract


    







JOINT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
THIS JOINT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT is made this 30th day of September, 2011 (the “ Closing Date ”) by and among CNX Gas Company LLC, a Virginia limited liability company (“ CONSOL ”), and Noble Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“ Noble ”). CONSOL and Noble shall sometimes be referred to herein together as the “ Parties ”, and individually as a “ Party ”.
Recitals
Pursuant to that certain Acquisition Agreement (as hereafter defined), CONSOL is transferring to Noble, and Noble is acquiring from CONSOL, certain undivided interests in the Oil and Gas Assets (as hereinafter defined) described therein;
The Parties desire to set forth their agreements for the joint exploration, development and operation of the Subject Assets (as hereinafter defined) in a coordinated manner using CONSOL Operator (as hereinafter defined) as operator of the CNX Operated Area (as hereinafter defined) and using Noble Operator (as hereinafter defined) as operator of the NBL Operated Area (as hereinafter defined);
This Agreement, the Acquisition Agreement and the Associated Agreements are parts of a single, integrated transaction; and
The Parties desire to set forth their respective rights and obligations with respect to all such arrangements.
NOW THEREFORE , in consideration of the mutual agreements contained herein, the benefits to be derived by each Party, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION

1.1     Defined Terms . Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings given such terms in Appendix I .

1.2     References and Rules of Construction . All references in this Agreement to Exhibits, Appendices, Articles, Sections, subsections and other subdivisions refer to the corresponding Exhibits, Appendices, Articles, Sections, subsections and other subdivisions of or to this Agreement unless expressly provided otherwise. Titles appearing at the beginning of any Articles, Sections, subsections and other subdivisions of this Agreement are for convenience only, do not constitute any part of this Agreement, and shall be disregarded in construing the language hereof. The words “this Agreement,” “herein,” “hereby,” “hereunder” and “hereof,” and words of similar import, refer to this Agreement as a whole and not to any particular Article, Section, subsection or other subdivision unless expressly so limited. The word “including” (in its various forms) means “including without limitation.” All references to “$” or “dollars” shall be deemed references to United States dollars. Each accounting term not defined herein will have the meaning given to it under generally accepted accounting principles. Pronouns in masculine, feminine or neuter genders shall be construed to state and include any other gender, and words, terms and titles (including terms defined herein) in the singular form shall be construed to include the plural and vice versa, unless the context otherwise requires. References to any Law or agreement means such Law or agreement as it may be amended from time to time.


1



ARTICLE II
SCOPE; PARTICIPATING INTERESTS; OPERATIONS

2.1     Scope . This Agreement shall govern the respective rights and obligations of the Parties with respect to the funding, exploration, development and operation of the Subject Assets, and the marketing and sale of Hydrocarbons produced therefrom.

2.2     Participating Interests .  

(a)     As of the Closing Date, the Participating Interests of the Parties are as follows:
Party
Participating Interest
CONSOL
50%
Noble
50%

(b)     If a Party Transfers all or any undivided percentage of its Joint Development Interest pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement, the Participating Interests of the Parties shall be revised accordingly.

2.3     Operations; Development Area .
  
(a)     Subject to Sections 2.3(c), 2.3(d), 2.5 and 2.6 and the other terms of this Agreement, CONSOL Operator shall manage and control the participation of the Parties in all Development Operations and Area-Wide Operations relating to the portion of the Development Area described on Exhibit A-2 (as adjusted pursuant to Section 2.3(c) , the “ CNX Operated Area ”) in accordance with the Development Plan and applicable Annual Plan and Budget and such other operating guidelines as the Joint Development Committee may establish, including proposing all Development Operations on behalf of the Parties under any Applicable Operating Agreement relating to such area, making all elections on behalf of the Parties under any Applicable Operating Agreement (other than elections with respect to operations proposed by a Third Party Operator or other Third Party under an Applicable Operating Agreement) relating to such area, and conducting all Area-Wide Operations on behalf of the Parties relating to such area. In addition, subject to Sections 2.5 and 2.6 , CONSOL Operator shall have such other powers and responsibilities as are set forth in this Agreement or as granted to it by the Joint Development Committee.

(b)     Subject to Sections 2.3(c), 2.3(d), 2.5 and 2.6 and the other terms of this Agreement, Noble Operator shall manage and control the participation of the Parties in all Development Operations and Area-Wide Operations relating to the portion of the Development Area described on Exhibit A-3 (as adjusted pursuant to Section 2.3(c) , the “ NBL Operated Area ”) in accordance with the Development Plan and applicable Annual Plan and Budget and such other operating guidelines as the Joint Development Committee may establish, including proposing all Development Operations on behalf of the Parties under any Applicable Operating Agreement relating to such area, making all elections on behalf of the Parties under any Applicable Operating Agreement (other than elections with respect to operations proposed by a Third Party Operator or other Third Party under an Applicable Operating Agreement) relating to such area, and conducting all Area-Wide Operations on behalf of the Parties relating to such area. In addition, subject to Sections 2.5 and 2.6 , Noble Operator shall have such other powers and responsibilities as are set forth in this Agreement or as granted to it by the Joint Development Committee.

(c)     CONSOL and Noble may adjust the allocation of the Operated Areas between the Party Operators by written agreement; provided that, at any time that Drilling Units have been designated covering at least 60% of the net acreage included in the Subject Assets within the NBL Operated Area and such Subject

2



Assets covered by such Drilling Units have become or, within the following 24-months months are reasonably expected to become, Developed Assets or P&A/Condemned Assets, then upon written request from Noble to CONSOL (an “ Expansion Request ”), Noble and CONSOL shall meet (which meeting shall occur within 15 days of such request being received by CONSOL) and use their commercially reasonable efforts to agree upon expanding the NBL Operated Area (and, if applicable, reducing the CNX Operated Area) so that Noble Operator can continue conducting drilling and completion Development Operations to the same extent and at the same pace that it was conducting drilling and completion Development Operations prior to the Expansion Request. If Noble and CONSOL are unable to so mutually agree upon an expansion of the NBL Operated Area within 45 days of CONSOL receiving an Expansion Request, then the NBL Operated Area shall automatically be expanded by one county (each, an “ Expansion County ”), which Expansion County shall be selected by Noble by choosing one of the counties listed on Schedule 2.3(c) that is not then a part of the NBL Operated Area (and, if applicable, the CNX Operated Area shall be reduced by excluding from such area such Expansion County, provided that, notwithstanding the foregoing, from and after the date of such expansion, the CNX Operated Area shall continue to include (and the NBL Operated Area shall not include) any Drilling Units within the Expansion County that were designated by CONSOL Operator prior to such expansion and on which any drilling and completion operations had been commenced or are reasonably expected to be commenced within six months following such expansion (the “ Excluded Units ”). Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, an Excluded Unit shall cease to be an Excluded Unit and operatorship of such Excluded Unit shall be transferred to Noble Operator promptly after all drilling and completion operations that caused such Drilling Unit to be an Excluded Unit have been concluded by CONSOL Operator. Unless otherwise mutually agreed, the right to expand the NBL Operated Area shall automatically terminate at the time that all counties listed on Schedule 2.3(c) have become part of the NBL Operated Area (excluding any Excluded Units).

(d)     Notwithstanding anything in the Agreement to the contrary, beginning on the Closing Date and ending on the date that is 90 days following the date on which CONSOL Operator receives written notice from Noble Operator that it is electing to assume operatorship of the NBL Operated Area, or such earlier date as CONSOL Operator and Noble Operator may mutually agree (the “ Operatorship Transition Period ”), the NBL Operated Area shall be deemed to be a part of the CNX Operated Area and CONSOL Operator shall serve as Party Operator of such Operated Area; provided that in the event that Noble Operator does not provide such notice to CONSOL Operator on or before December 31, 2012, then the Operatorship Transition Period shall terminate, the NBL Operated Area thereafter shall be deemed to cover none of the Development Area, the CONSOL Operated Area shall be deemed to cover both the area initially defined as the NBL Operated Area and the area initially defined as the CONSOL Operated Area and the provisions of Section 2.3(c) shall no longer be applicable. During the Operatorship Transition Period, prior to commencing any Development Operation in the Operated Area that is described on Exhibit A-3 , CONSOL Operator shall provide a copy of any AFE and any related drilling and completion plan for such Development Operation to Noble Operator and thereafter meet with Noble Operator to discuss and review such AFE and/or related drilling and completion plan. At the end of the Operatorship Transition Period, CONSOL Operator shall use its commercially reasonable efforts to assist Noble Operator in taking over as operator in the NBL Operated Area.

2.4     Operating Agreements .
  
(a)     Except for any Unit JOAs that are executed and delivered by the Parties on the Closing Date, all Leases and related assets in the Development Area: (i) in which only the Parties hold interests as of the Closing Date, or (ii) in which the Parties hereafter both acquire interests, shall be deemed to be subject to and governed by an operating agreement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B-1 (the “ Master JOA ”); provided that with respect to those Subject Assets that are subject to any Third Party Operating Agreement,

3



only the lien provisions of the Master JOA shall be applicable to such Subject Assets. On the Closing Date, the Master JOA shall be executed by the Parties and shall cover all such Subject Assets (including those Subject Assets that are subject to a Third Party Operating Agreement), excluding, however, those Subject Assets that are covered by a Unit JOA. All Leases and related assets in the Development Area in which the Parties hereafter both acquire interests that are not subject to a Third Party Operating Agreement, shall automatically become subject to the Master JOA and, within 30 days following the end of each calendar quarter, the Parties shall supplement and/or amend each applicable Master JOA Agreement to reflect the addition of such Leases and related assets; provided that to the extent that such Leases and related assets are Developed Assets and not subject to a Third Party Operating Agreement at the time of acquisition, then such Leases and related assets shall become subject to a Unit JOA to be executed by the Parties at the time of the acquisition of such Leases and related assets. For those Subject Assets that are subject to a Third Party Operating Agreement, such Third Party Operating Agreement shall govern the operations thereon; provided that if such Subject Assets as of the Closing Date are not Developed Assets, then the lien provisions of the Master JOA shall be applicable to such Subject Assets.

(b)     On the Closing Date, the Parties shall execute and file a separate Memorandum of Operating Agreement, Lien and Financing Statement, in the case of Noble, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B-2 (the “ Noble Master JOA Memorandum ”), and, in the case of CONSOL, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B-3 (the " CONSOL Master JOA Memorandum " and, together with the Noble Master JOA Memorandum, the " Master JOA Memoranda ") and related financing statements for the Master JOA and, within 30 days of the Closing Date, the Parties will file such Master JOA Memoranda in the real property records of each county in which the Subject Assets that are covered by the Master JOA are located and such financing statements in the proper office under the Uniform Commercial Code in the states in which such Subject Assets are located.

(c)     From and after the Closing Date, if a Drilling Unit is designated by CONSOL Operator or Noble Operator to cover a specified portion of the Subject Assets covered by the Master JOA that is not also covered by a Third Party Operating Agreement and such portion of the Subject Assets covered by such Drilling Unit become Developed Assets, then the Master JOA shall automatically be deemed to not cover such portion of the Subject Assets and a separate operating agreement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit D-1 (each, a “ Unit JOA ”), with CONSOL Operator or Noble Operator serving as operator (as applicable pursuant to Section 2.3 ) shall be deemed to cover such portion of the Subject Assets with respect to such Drilling Unit. Further, from and after the Closing Date, if any portion of the Subject Assets that are subject to a Third Party Operating Agreement become Developed Assets, then the Master JOA shall automatically be deemed to not cover such portion of the Subject Assets and only such Third Party Operating Agreement shall cover such portion of the Subject Assets.

(d)     Within 30 days following the end of each calendar quarter, the Parties shall (i) modify or amend the Master JOA and each Master JOA Memoranda and related financing statements (including making any filings necessary to reflect such modifications or amendments in the applicable real property and other public records) to reflect any Subject Assets that have become subject to, or removed from, the Master JOA during the previous calendar quarter, (ii) execute and deliver separate Unit JOAs to cover any Subject Assets that have been deemed to have become subject to a Unit JOA during the previous calendar quarter and (iii) execute and file a separate Memorandum of Operating Agreement, Lien and Financing Statement, in the case of Noble, in the form attached hereto in Exhibit D-2 (the “ Noble Unit JOA Memorandum ”), and, in the case of CONSOL, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit D-3 (the “ CONSOL Unit JOA Memorandum ” and, together with the Noble Unit JOA Memorandum, the “ Unit JOA Memoranda ”) and related financing statements for each Unit JOA that is being executed and delivered pursuant to clause (ii) above and file such Unit JOA Memoranda in the real property records of each county in which the Subject Assets that are covered

4



by the applicable Unit JOA are located and in the proper office under the Uniform Commercial Code in the states in which such Subject Assets are located.

(e)     In addition, subject to Section 2.4(a) , the Parties agree to use their respective commercially reasonable efforts to have the form of the Unit JOA adopted as the operative operating agreement by all Working Interest owners for any Drilling Unit in the Development Area in which Persons other than the Parties hold Working Interests.

(f)     As between the Parties, each Applicable Operating Agreement shall be subject to the provisions of the Tax Partnership Agreement unless and until the applicability of such provisions to the Subject Assets subject to each such Applicable Operating Agreement terminates in accordance with the terms of the Tax Partnership Agreement.

2.5     Operator .
  
(a)      CONSOL Operator .

(i)     CONSOL Operator is hereby designated and agrees to serve as operator under each Joint Development Operating Agreement relating to the CNX Operated Area. In addition, to the extent requested by CONSOL Operator, the Parties agree to use their respective commercially reasonable efforts to support CONSOL Operator in any vote with respect to becoming or remaining as operator under each other Applicable Operating Agreement relating to the CNX Operated Area.

(ii)     CONSOL Operator (1) may be removed or resign as operator under an Applicable Operating Agreement pursuant to the relevant provisions of such Applicable Operating Agreement or (2) may be removed as operator under all Applicable Operating Agreements pursuant to Section 8.3(c)(ii) . In the event that CONSOL Operator is removed or resigns as operator under an Applicable Operating Agreement relating to the CNX Operated Area or is removed as CONSOL Operator pursuant to Section 8.3(c)(ii) , Noble shall have the right, which shall be exercisable by written notice to CONSOL Operator within 15 days following such removal or resignation, to have Noble Operator named as operator of the CNX Operated Area to the extent it relates to such removal or resignation with respect to any Joint Development Operating Agreement or have CONSOL vote its interest under any Third Party Operating Agreement for Noble Operator to be named the operator under any such Third Party Operating Agreement (and if so exercised, such area shall be removed from the CNX Operated Area and added to the NBL Operated Area).

(b)      Noble Operator .

(i)     Noble Operator is hereby designated and agrees to serve as operator under each Joint Development Operating Agreement relating to the NBL Operated Area. In addition, to the extent requested by Noble Operator, the Parties agree to use their respective commercially reasonable efforts to support Noble Operator in any vote with respect to becoming or remaining as operator under each other Applicable Operating Agreement relating to the NBL Operated Area.

(ii)     Noble Operator (1) may be removed or resign as operator under an Applicable Operating Agreement pursuant to the relevant provisions of such Applicable Operating Agreement or (2) may be removed as operator under all Applicable Operating Agreements pursuant to Section 8.3(c)(i). In the event that Noble Operator is removed or resigns as operator under an Applicable Operating Agreement relating to the NBL Operated Area or is removed as Noble Operator pursuant to Section 8.3(c)(i), CONSOL shall have the right, which shall be exercisable by written notice to Noble Operator within 15 days following

5



such removal or resignation, to have CONSOL Operator named as operator of the NBL Operated Area to the extent it relates to such removal or resignation with respect to any Joint Development Operating Agreement or have Noble vote its interest under any Third Party Operating Agreement for CONSOL Operator to be named the operator under any such Third Party Operating Agreement (and if so exercised, such area shall be removed from the NBL Operated Area and added to the CNX Operated Area).

(c)      HSE Standards .

(i)     Each Party Operator shall be required to maintain health, safety and environmental policies and programs covering Development Operations and Area-Wide Operations conducted by such Party Operator in its Operated Area (as amended and modified from time to time, an “ HSE Program ”). Each Party Operator shall conduct (i) regular audits and reviews of its HSE Program and (ii) an annual review of its HSE Program. Prior to conducting an annual review of its HSE Program, each Party Operator shall give each other Party reasonable advance notice of such annual review and an opportunity to reasonably participate in such annual review.

(ii)     Each Party Operator shall submit to the HSE Committee, promptly after such annual review is completed, a written description describing in reasonable detail the results and findings of such annual review. Each Party Operator shall meet at least quarterly with the HSE Committee to review and discuss such Party Operator's HSE Program and its compliance therewith.

2.6     Liability of Operator .
  
(a)     Subject to the rights of a Party to remove any Party acting as operator under any Applicable Operating Agreement in accordance with the terms hereof or thereof, in no event shall any Party serving as a Party Operator have any liability as a Party Operator to another Party or its Affiliates under this Agreement, under any Applicable Operating Agreement or Law or common law (including on account of its marketing of any Party's production pursuant to this Agreement) for any claim, damage, loss or liability sustained or incurred in connection with its operations with respect to any Development Operation or Area-Wide Operation (including its activities to market any Party's production pursuant to Section 2.10) or any breach of any provision regarding the standard of performance of an operator in performing operations under any Applicable Operating Agreement, EVEN IF SUCH CLAIM, DAMAGE, LOSS OR LIABILITY AROSE IN WHOLE OR IN PART FROM THE ACTIVE, PASSIVE, SOLE OR CONCURRENT NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY OR OTHER FAULT OF SUCH PARTY, ANY OF ITS AFFILIATES OR ANY OFFICER, PARTNER, MEMBER, DIRECTOR, AGENT OR EMPLOYEE OF SUCH PARTY, OTHER THAN IF SUCH CLAIM, DAMAGE, LOSS OR LIABILITY AROSE FROM THE GROSS NEGLIGENCE OR WILLFUL MISCONDUCT OF SUCH PARTY, ANY OF ITS AFFILIATES OR ANY OFFICER, PARTNER, MEMBER, DIRECTOR OR EMPLOYEE OF SUCH PARTY; provided that no Party Operator shall be released and/or exonerated from liability for a material breach of any financial, administrative or procedural (such as providing notices and voting) obligation of such Person under this Agreement or (if a Party Operator) under any Applicable Operating Agreement; and provided further that each Party acknowledges that any such claim, damage, loss or liability (other than that caused by the gross negligence or willful misconduct of a Party, its Affiliates or any officer, partner, member, director, agent or employee of a Party or any of its Affiliates or the material breach of any financial, administrative or procedural (such as providing notices and voting) obligation of a Party Operator), shall be borne severally by the Parties (including such operator) in proportion to their interests in the operations or activities giving rise to such claim, damage, loss or liability.

(b)     Any Party serving as a Party Operator shall bear sole liability on behalf of the Parties for any claim, damage, loss or liability sustained or incurred in connection with any Development Operation or Area-

6



Wide Operation or any other operation or activity prescribed hereunder or any breach of any provision regarding the standard of performance of an operator in performing operations under any Applicable Operating Agreement to the extent such claim, damage, loss or liability arose in whole or in part from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of such Party or any of its Affiliates or any officer, partner, member, director, agent or employee of such Party or Affiliate of such Party.

(c)     Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein or in any Applicable Operating Agreement, no Party Operator shall be liable for the gross negligence or willful misconduct of a secondee of another Party, nor shall the gross negligence or willful misconduct of any such secondee be grounds for removal of a Party Operator pursuant to Section 2.5 .

2.7     Rentals, Shut-in Well Payments and Royalties . Each Party Operator shall be responsible for paying, on behalf of each Party, such Party's share of (a) all rentals, shut-in well payments and minimum royalties required to be paid to lessors under the Leases included in the Subject Assets in such Party Operator's Operated Area and (b) all valid and subsisting royalties, overriding royalties and other burdens required to be paid to lessors and holders of overriding royalties and other burdens on the Leases included in the Subject Assets in such Party Operator's Operated Area; provided that, subject to this Section 2.7 , a Party Operator may determine, in its reasonable discretion as a reasonable prudent operator (after consulting with Noble, in the case that CONSOL is the Party Operator, or CONSOL, in the case that Noble is the Party Operator), not to renew, maintain or extend any such Lease in its Operated Area. A Party Operator shall be entitled to contract with Third Parties to provide the foregoing services (including in the case of Noble Operator, contracting with CONSOL and its Affiliates in accordance with and subject to the terms of the Services Agreement (as defined in the Acquisition Agreement) during the term thereof). If a Party Operator (after consulting with the applicable Party) determines not to renew, maintain or extend any of the Leases included in the Subject Assets in its Operated Area, such Party Operator will provide each other Party with no less than 30 days (to the extent reasonably possible) notice of such determination in writing prior to the expiration of such portion of such Lease, and each other Party will have the right (in the proportion that the participating Party's undivided interest in such Lease bears to all other participating Parties' undivided interest in such Lease) to pay the rental, shut-in well payment, minimum royalty, lease renewal or other payment and receive an assignment from the non-participating Parties of their respective interests in such Lease (in the proportion that the participating Party's undivided interest in such Lease bears to all other participating Parties' undivided interest in such Lease). Thereafter, notwithstanding anything contained in this Agreement to the contrary, such Lease shall be deemed to be excluded from the terms and conditions of this Agreement. A Party Operator may invoice the other Parties up to 30 days prior to the date any rental, shut-in payment, minimum royalty or any other lease renewal or maintenance payment shall become due, and each Party shall pay such invoice in accordance with Section 7.2 . No Party Operator will be liable to any Party for any negligence, act, error, mistake or omission pertaining to the performance of its obligations under this Section 2.7 or any loss resulting from such negligence (whether active, passive, Sole or concurrent) act, error, mistake or omission unless such negligence, act, error, mistake or omission constitutes gross negligence or willful misconduct by such Party Operator.

2.8     Insurance .
  
(a)     Each Party Operator shall use its commercially reasonable efforts to carry insurance for the benefit of the joint account of the Parties as outlined in Exhibit C (or at such other insurance level as the Joint Development Committee may approve) for those Subject Assets for which it serves as operator. Each Party Operator shall provide copies of such policies to the Parties covered by such policies upon request, and shall notify all Parties to be covered by such policies if it has been unable to obtain or maintain any of such policies. Except for worker's compensation policies, each Party Operator shall use its commercially

7



reasonable efforts to arrange for each of the Parties, according to their respective interests, to be named as additional insureds on the relevant policies, with waivers of subrogation in favor of all Parties with respect to their interests under this Agreement or such Applicable Operating Agreement where such Party Operator is the operator, as applicable. Each Party Operator shall use commercially reasonable efforts to duly file any relevant claims and to collect for the account of the relevant Parties any proceeds under such policies.

(b)     Notwithstanding the foregoing, any Party may obtain such insurance as it deems advisable for its own account at its own expense. Such insurance shall, in so far as it relates to Development Operations or Area-Wide Operations, contain a waiver of subrogation by the insurers in favor of each of the other Parties. Each Party Operator shall reasonably cooperate and assist such insurers in the investigation of insurance claims made by a Party in connection with the operations performed hereunder.

2.9     Reports .
  
(a)     Unless otherwise prohibited by the terms of an Applicable Operating Agreement or (subject to Section 2.9(d) below) confidentiality obligation under any other applicable contract or agreement or by applicable Law, each Party Operator shall provide the following data and reports, as they are produced or compiled after the date hereof (unless otherwise provided below), for each Development Operation for which it serves as operator and each Area-Wide Operation in its Operated Area to the other Parties that participate in such Development Operation or Area-Wide Operation:

(i) copies of all logs or surveys, including in digitally recorded format if such exists;

(ii) daily drilling and production reports;

(iii) copies of all tests and core data and analysis reports;

(iv) final well recap reports, including well bore diagrams;

(v) copies of all plugging reports;

(vi)
as requested by a Party, copies of current geological and geophysical maps, seismic sections and shot point location maps;

(vii) development schedules and annual progress reports on development projects;

(viii) field and well performance reports;

(ix)
copies of written notices provided by any Third Party regarding violations or potential violations of applicable Law (including any applicable health, safety or environmental Laws);

(x) copies of all material reports provided to any Governmental Authority;

(xi)
as requested by a Party, copies of any material correspondence between such operator and any Governmental Authority;

(xii)
copies of all title opinions, including drill site title opinions and division order title opinions;

8




(xiii) copies of all post-fracing flowback reports;

(xiv) such other information as may be reasonably requested by a Party; and

(xv) such other reports as may be directed by the Joint Development Committee.

(b)     Notwithstanding the foregoing, but without limiting the information required to be provided by a Party Operator pursuant to an Applicable Operating Agreement, a Party Operator will not be obligated to provide to any Party copies of: (i) any of its own independent reserve reports or evaluations or reservoir studies; or (ii) any data or report to the extent such data or report is generated, assembled or prepared by a Third Party and the Party requesting such data or report has not paid its Share of Development Costs relating to such data or report.

(c)     To the extent that a Party is responsible for any portion of the liability associated therewith, each Party Operator shall promptly notify such Party of any Third Party written claim or suit arising from Development Operations or Area-Wide Operations in its Operated Area of which such Party Operator becomes aware that exceeds (or is reasonably expected to exceed) $50,000, and, upon request of such Party from time to time, shall further provide, in a timely manner, the then current information in its possession regarding the progress and status of any such claims or suits.

(d)     Each Party Operator shall use its commercially reasonable efforts obtain a waiver of any confidentiality obligation under an applicable contract or agreement that prevents such Party Operator from providing to the other Parties the data and reports required by Section 2.9(a) .

2.10     Marketing .

(a)      Production . Each Party retains and reserves the right to take-in-kind all of its Production in the CNX Operated Area and the Noble Operated Area subject to the terms of this Section 2.10.

(b)      Gas Production .

(i)     For the Interim Marketing Period, Noble hereby designates CONSOL Operator as marketer of Noble's Gas Production (“ Marketer ”), in the CNX Operated Area and in the Noble Operated Area, produced during the Interim Marketing Period in accordance with and subject to the following terms of this Section 2.10 . During the Interim Marketing Period and subject to the remaining provisions of this Section 2.10 , Marketer shall have authority and responsibility to market and sell such Gas Production (but not hedge such Gas Production) and to enter into sales, transportation, gathering and treatment agreements with respect to such Gas Production on behalf of the Party that owns the same (a “ Marketing Transaction ”); provided that Marketer shall not enter into a Marketing Transaction that (i) has a noncompetition provision, area of mutual interest restriction, preferential purchase right, or dedication of properties or (ii) a term that extends beyond March 31, 2013, in each case, that is binding upon a Party without the prior written consent of such Party. For each Marketing Transaction, Noble's Gas Production in an Operated Area shall be marketed on terms at least as favorable as terms received by Marketer for its share of Gas Production during the Interim Marketing Period and Marketer will market all Gas Production on market-based terms as reasonably determined in good faith by Marketer. Unless Noble otherwise consents to the same in writing, none of Noble's Gas Production may be marketed to Marketer itself or any Affiliate of Marketer. During the Interim Marketing Period, title to Noble's Gas Production will pass to (A) with respect to all processed natural gas liquids, condensate or other processed products from such Gas Production (“ Processed Gas Production ”),

9



to the processor at the point at which title is required to be transferred to such processor under the applicable processing agreement and (B) with respect to all other such Gas Production (“ Residual Gas Production ”), to Marketer at the first delivery point location into an interstate natural gas pipeline system. During the Interim Marketing Period, all Residual Gas Production shall be sold under the NAESB Agreement and the related transaction confirmations. Furthermore, during the Interim Marketing Period, title to Noble's Gas Production shall at all times remain with Noble until such time as title is passed to another Person as described above, such that all products, both volume and value, sold on behalf of Noble or directly by Noble is to be reported as production volume, sales and revenue, by Noble. During the Interim Marketing Period, the Parties will cause their Gas Production to be delivered pursuant to the Processing Agreements, as required.

(ii)     During the Interim Marketing Period, Marketer will make all nominations that are required under the terms of any of its Marketing Transactions. As requested by Marketer from time to time, Noble will reasonably cooperate and coordinate with Marketer in order to permit Marketer to perform under the terms of each of its Marketing Transaction with respect to Noble's Gas Production and Noble shall indemnify, defend and hold Marketer harmless from any breach of any Marketing Transaction to the extent arising from Noble's failure to so reasonably cooperate and coordinate.

(iii)     Subject to Section 8.3(a) , during the Interim Marketing Period Marketer shall remit to Noble all amounts due to Noble under the NAESB Agreement as and when due under the NAESB Agreement.

( iv)    At the end of the Interim Marketing Period, each Party will take-in-kind any and all of its Gas Production in the CNX Operated Area and the Noble Operated Area and provide its own full marketing services.

(c)      Transportation and Processing .

(i)     After the Interim Marketing Period, subject to Section 2.10(c) , each Party shall be responsible for obtaining their own gathering, processing and transportation agreements with respect to their Gas Production. Prior to the end of the Interim Marketing Period and, if and to the extent required by Schedule 2.10(a) , thereafter, each Party will comply with the terms of Schedule 2.10(a) with respect to the Downstream Contracts and the Peoples Contract.

(ii)     During the Interim Marketing Period and for so long thereafter as CONSOL holds any of the Downstream Contracts for the benefit of Noble pursuant to Schedule 2.10(a) , Noble shall be responsible for, and shall pay in accordance with Section 7.2 , all demand charges and tariffs required to be paid by CONSOL with respect to such Downstream Contracts to the extent applicable to the Assigned FT Interests. During the Interim Marketing Period, Noble shall be responsible for, and shall pay in accordance with Section 7.2 , in addition to any other amounts set forth herein, in the NAESB Agreement or any related transaction confirmations, a daily reservation fee of $2,700. During the Interim Marketing Period, with respect to that amount of Noble's and its Affiliates' Gas Production that is delivered to the Texas Eastern Transmission interstate pipeline in Marshall, West Virginia, Green, Pennsylvania, Fayette, Pennsylvania, Westmoreland, Pennsylvania, or Indiana, Pennsylvania, that is in excess of 54,000 MMBtu per day but less than 104,001 MMBtu per day (the “ Excess Gas Production ”), CONSOL shall purchase such Excess Gas Production under the terms of the NAESB Agreement and the related transaction confirmations at the inlet meter of the Texas Eastern Transmission interstate pipeline and, notwithstanding anything in this Section 2.10 , the NAESB Agreement or any related transaction confirmation to the contrary, pay Noble and its Affiliates in respect of such Excess Gas Production as and when required under the terms of the NAESB Agreement an amount equal to (x) the first of the month Platts Inside F.E.R.C's Gas Market Report, “Price of Spot Gas

10



Delivered to Pipelines,” for deliveries at Appalachian Lebanon Hub for the calendar month in which such Excess Gas Production is so delivered multiplied by (y) the amount of Excess Gas Production delivered during such calendar month.

(iii)     For purposes of flow assurance for each Party's share of Gas Production, it is the intent of the Parties to participate equally in any future processing agreements for Gas Production obtained by either Party after the Closing Date. If either Party desires to acquire additional processing capacity, then prior to entering into negotiations for a new processing agreement, such Party shall provide written notice to the Joint Development Committee, which shall include, the general deal parameters and the portion or portions of the Subject Assets within the Development Area that would be affected by such new processing agreement (a “ Proposed Processing Agreement ”). At the next meeting of the Joint Development Committee following such submission, the Joint Development Committee shall vote to authorize or not authorize a Party (the “ Negotiating Party ”) to negotiate the Proposed Processing Agreement on behalf of the Parties. Any members of the Joint Development Committee appointed by the Party (or its Affiliates) that submits a proposal for a Proposed Processing Agreement shall be deemed to have voted to authorize a Negotiating Party to negotiate the terms of a Proposed Processing Agreement on behalf of the Parties in accordance with this Section 2.10(b)(iii) . If the Joint Development Committee fails to authorize a Negotiating Party to negotiate a Proposed Processing Agreement on behalf of the Parties, then the Party making the proposal to acquire additional processing capacity may enter into a processing agreement covering the subject matter of the proposal for the Proposed Processing Agreement (with such revisions as are necessary to account for only such Party's Gas Production being subject to such agreement). If the Joint Development Committee authorizes a Negotiating Party to negotiate the Proposed Processing Agreement on behalf of the Parties, then, for a period of 90 days following the date of such authorization, such Negotiating Party shall have the exclusive right to negotiate such Proposed Processing Agreement on behalf of the Parties and no other Party shall negotiate or enter into any processing agreement relating to the subject matter of such Proposed Processing Agreement; provided that if such Negotiating Party fails to negotiate such Proposed Processing Agreement within such 90-day period, then such Negotiating Party will no longer have the right to negotiate such Proposed Processing Agreement (and until it resubmits a written notice to the Joint Development Committee to obtain the Joint Development Committee's authorization of another Proposed Processing Agreement in accordance with the provisions of this Section 2.10(b)(iii) ). In negotiating any Proposed Processing Agreement, the Negotiating Party shall use its commercially reasonable efforts to negotiate any processing agreement or agreements on market based terms and to negotiate separate processing agreements for each Party (with the same terms and other than revisions necessary to account for each Party's separate Gas Production). Upon completion of such negotiations, if applicable, the Negotiating Party shall submit the final Proposed Processing Agreement or agreements to the Joint Development Committee. At the next meeting of the Joint Development Committee following such submission, the Joint Development Committee shall vote to approve or disapprove such agreement or agreements. If the Joint Development Committee approves such agreement or agreements, then each Party shall promptly execute and deliver such agreement or, if applicable, its respective agreement. If the Joint Development Committee fails to approve a Proposed Processing Agreement or Proposed Processing Agreements after such agreement(s) has been negotiated by the Negotiating Party, then the Party whose members of the Joint Development Committee voted to approve such final Proposed Processing Agreements or agreements may enter into a processing agreement covering the subject matter of the Proposed Processing Agreement (with such revisions as are necessary to account for only such Negotiating Party's Gas Production being subject to such agreement).

(iv)     Upon mutual agreement of the Parties, the Parties shall have the right, prior to September 25, 2011, to unwind the production dedication under the Processing Agreements in accordance with the terms of the Processing Agreements.


11



(d)     Hedging . Each Party will be responsible for conducting (for its own account) any hedging activities with respect to its Production from the Subject Assets.

(e )     Administrative Services and Reporting . Each Party or Party Operator conducting marketing activities under this Section 2.10 on behalf of another Party shall also be responsible for providing any accounts receivable, collection, revenue accounting, system balancing and other back office marketing services necessary to market such Production. Each Party or Party Operator conducting marketing activities under this Section 2.10 on behalf of another Party shall provide to such other Party the following reports and information as such data and reports are produced or compiled (unless otherwise provided below) relating to the Production being marketed hereunder on behalf of such other Party:

(i)     counterparty credit exposure reports, as amended from time to time, which reports shall include a list of counterparties with to which the Parties have credit exposure, the maximum amount of potential credit exposure to each such counterparty for a 60-day period (regardless of any outstanding credit extensions to such counterparty at the time of such report) and any outstanding credit extensions to such counterparty at the time of such report;

(ii)     prior to the first day of each calendar month, a listing on anticipated sales and volumes by counterparty for the production of such Party being sold during such relevant calendar month;

(iii)     copies of all transaction confirmations entered into under any NAESB agreement or similar agreement to which such Party or Party Operator is a party; and

(iv)     any other data or information that a Party whose production is being marketed hereunder may reasonably request relating to its Production.

(f)     Wellhead Condensate Production . From and after the Closing Date, each Party Operator shall have exclusive authority and responsibility to market and sell all of the Wellhead Condensate Production of the Parties in the Operated Area in which it operates (but not hedge such Wellhead Condensate Production), and to enter into any necessary marketing agreements for such Wellhead Condensate Production. A Party Operator shall not enter into any marketing agreement that has a noncompetition provision, area of mutual interest restriction, preferential purchase right or dedication of properties that is binding upon a Party without the prior written consent of such Party. Each Party's Wellhead Condensate Production in an Operated Area shall be marketed by the applicable Party Operator on market-based terms at least as favorable as terms received by the applicable Party Operator for its share of Wellhead Condensate Production and the applicable Party Operator will market all Wellhead Condensate Production on market-based terms as reasonably determined in good faith by the applicable Party Operator. Unless a Party otherwise consents to the same in writing, none of such Party's Wellhead Condensate Production may be marketed to the Party Operator marketing such Wellhead Condensate Production or any Affiliate of such Party Operator. Title to a Party's Wellhead Condensate Production will remain in such Party until such time as title to such Wellhead Condensate Production is required to be transferred to the purchasing counterparty under the terms of the applicable sales contract. As requested by a Party Operator from time to time, each Party will reasonably cooperate and coordinate with such Party Operator in order to permit such Party Operator to market such Party's Wellhead Condensate Production. All net proceeds from a Party's Wellhead Condensate Production received by a Party Operator shall be held for the account of such Party and delivered by such Party Operator no later than the 25th day of the calendar month following receipt thereof by such Party Operator to an account designated by the applicable Party.

(g)     Drip Condensate Production . From and after the Closing Date, each Party's Drip Condensate

12



Production will be handled by the gatherer of any applicable gathering agreement. Title to a Party's Drip Condensate Production will remain in such Party until such time as title to such Drip Condensate Production is required to be transferred to the gatherer under the terms of the applicable gathering agreement.

2.11     Development Services; Overhead Rates; and Marketing Fees .
  
(a)     Development Services .

(i)     Each Party Operator shall be entitled to perform Development Services required in connection with Development Operations and Area-Wide Operations conducted by such Party Operator.

(ii)     Subject to Section 2.11(d) , with respect to Development Services performed by a Party Operator hereunder, each Party shall pay to the applicable Party Operator its Participating Interest share of (A) those Services Costs incurred by such Party Operator in performing such Development Services and (B) all Third Party expenses incurred by such Party Operator in performing such Development Services (except to the extent such expenses are paid pursuant to and under an Applicable Operating Agreement), in each case, in accordance with Section 7.2 .

(b)     Overhead Rates . With respect to Development Operations conducted by a Party Operator under an Applicable Operating Agreement, each Party shall pay to such Party Operator such Party's Working Interest share of the producing well and/or drilling well overhead rates specified in such Applicable Operating Agreement in accordance with Section 7.2 for such Development Operations with respect to which it participates.

(c)     Marketing Fee . Subject to Section 2.11(d) , during the Interim Gas Marketing Period, Noble shall pay or reimburse CONSOL Operator a monthly marketing fee equal to $0.02 for each MMBtu of Noble's Gas Production that is purchased by CONSOL Operator from Noble pursuant to the NAESB Agreement (the “ Marketing Fee ”), in accordance with Section 7.2 .

(d)     Periodic Review . On or before August 31 in the calendar year immediately preceding the relevant calendar year, the Joint Development Committee shall review the calculation of Services Costs being charged by each Party Operator pursuant to the then current Annual Plan and Budget and the amount of the Marketing Fees chargeable by CONSOL and vote to approve the calculation of such Services Costs and the amount of such Marketing Fee for the following year (each of which may be modified by the Joint Development Committee). If the Joint Development Committee fails to approve the calculation of such Services Costs or the amount of such Marketing Fee (with any modifications that the Joint Development Committee may approve) for such following year, then any Party may submit such matter to an expert in accordance with Section 11.7(b) and such expert shall adjust such calculation and/or fees so that the amount of Services Costs and/or Marketing Fees chargeable to the Parties under this Section 2.11 equals in such expert's opinion a market rate for fees being charged for similar services by other Persons in the Development Area at the time of such adjustment.

2.12     Contracts; Use of Affiliates .
  
(a)     Except as provided in Section 2.12(c) , each Party Operator may enter into contracts and other agreements on customary terms and conditions in connection with any Development Operations or any Area-Wide Operations conducted by or at the direction of such Party Operator.


13



(b)     Except as provided in Section 2.12(c) , each Party Operator may contract with its Affiliates and related parties to provide services and materials in connection with Development Operations or Area-Wide Operations. All services performed and materials supplied by any such Affiliates or related parties shall be performed or supplied at arm's length and on competitive rates, pursuant to written agreements, and in accordance with customs and standards prevailing in the industry.

(c)     Notwithstanding Sections 2.12(a) or 2.12(b) or any Applicable Operating Agreement to the contrary, unless either (i) such contract has been approved by the Joint Development Committee or (ii) such contract is expressly contemplated by an Annual Plan and Budget, a Party Operator shall not enter into an Affiliate Contract or a contract or agreement that contains a confidentiality obligation that would prevent such Party Operator from providing to the other Parties the data and reports required by Section 2.9(a) .

2.13     Non-Solicitation .
  
(a)     During the term of this Agreement and for a period of 12 calendar months thereafter, Noble and its Affiliates may not solicit or hire any officer or employee of CONSOL or its Affiliates without first obtaining the prior written consent of CONSOL; provided that this prohibition shall not apply to offers of employment made by Noble or its Affiliates pursuant to a general solicitation of employment to the public or the industry.

(b)     During the term of this Agreement and for a period of 12 calendar months thereafter, CONSOL and its Affiliates may not solicit or hire any officer or employee of Noble or its Affiliates without first obtaining the prior written consent of Noble; provided that this prohibition shall not apply to offers of employment made by CONSOL or its Affiliates pursuant to a general solicitation of employment to the public or the industry.

2.14     Conflict of Interest Policy . CONSOL Operator and Noble Operator shall develop and implement a policy regarding required disclosure of conflicts of interest that any officer, director or key employee of that Party or Affiliate of that Party may have with the interest of any of the Parties in connection with the conduct of Development Operations.

2.15     Secondment .  From time to time after the Closing Date, each of CONSOL or Noble may second certain of their (or their Affiliates') employees into the organization of the other Party pursuant to the terms of the CONSOL Secondment Agreement or the Noble Secondment Agreement, as applicable. From time to time the Joint Development Committee may increase or decrease the number of secondees and change or modify their positions in the other Party's organization.

ARTICLE III
JOINT DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE;
DEVELOPMENT PLAN; ANNUAL PLANS AND BUDGETS

3.1     Joint Development Committee .
  
(a)     To facilitate the creation, approval and amendment of the Development Plan and each Annual Plan and Budget, to approve or disapprove the other matters set forth in





14



Section 3.1(h) and to provide (directly or through a subcommittee) advice and recommendations for the conduct of Development Operations and Area-Wide Operations, there is hereby established a joint development committee composed of representatives of CONSOL and Noble (the “ Joint Development Committee ”). CONSOL shall be entitled to appoint three representatives to the Joint Development Committee and Noble shall be entitled to appoint three representatives to the Joint Development Committee. The initial representatives to the Joint Development Committee for CONSOL shall be Randall M. Albert, M. Charles Hardoby and Stephen W. Johnson and the initial representatives to the Joint Development Committee for Noble shall be Barry Shelden , John Lewis and Aaron Carlson. Each Party shall have the right to change its representatives at any time by giving notice of such change to the other Parties.

(b)     The Joint Development Committee shall have only the powers and duties expressly ascribed to it in this Agreement.

(c)     The representatives of a Party shall be authorized to represent and bind such Party with respect to any matter that is within the powers of the Joint Development Committee hereunder and is properly brought before the Joint Development Committee. On all matters coming before the Joint Development Committee, the representatives of each of CONSOL and Noble shall have an aggregate vote equal to the Participating Interest of the Person (and its Affiliates) that appointed such representatives divided by the aggregate Participating Interests of all Persons (and their Affiliates) with representatives on the Joint Development Committee. Any representative of a Party that is present or otherwise available to vote or consent on an action of the Joint Development Committee shall have the authority to cast all of the votes or consents allocated to all of the representatives of such Party. In addition to the representatives, each Party may also send such advisors as it may deem appropriate to any Joint Development Committee meetings.

(d)     Unless otherwise agreed to by the members of the Joint Development Committee, the Joint Development Committee shall meet once (and no more than once unless otherwise mutually agreed) per calendar month to review and discuss reports concerning the Development Plan, Annual Plan and Budget and the drilling schedule, relevant geoscience and other data relating to Subject Assets and such other matters as may be reasonably proposed by a Party Operator or members of the Joint Development Committee. Meetings of the Joint Development Committee may be called by either CONSOL Operator or NBL Operator by giving notice to the members of the Joint Development Committee at least 5 days in advance of such meeting, along with a proposed agenda for such meeting (which shall include any items that a member of the Joint Development Committee or a Party Operator may request to have included on such agenda). All meetings shall be held during normal business hours at a time and place agreed to by CONSOL Operator and NBL Operator, or failing to reach such agreement, meetings occurring in even numbered months shall be held in a location selected by NBL Operator and meetings held in odd numbered months shall be held in a location selected by CONSOL Operator; provided that members of the Joint Development Committee shall be allowed to participate telephonically (or, to the extent available, by video conference) in any such meeting.

(e)     All decisions, approvals and other actions of the Joint Development Committee shall be decided by the affirmative vote of members of the Joint Development Committee holding collectively at least two-thirds of the votes eligible to vote on such proposals (which eligible votes, for the avoidance of doubt, shall not include any votes by the representatives of any Defaulting Party in accordance with Section 8.2(a) ). The Joint Development Committee shall keep a written record of all meetings and actions taken by the Joint Development Committee or any of its subcommittees. To the fullest extent permitted by Law and notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement or any Associated Agreement to the contrary, no member of the Joint Development Committee, in his or her capacity as a member of the Joint Development Committee, shall have any duty, fiduciary or otherwise, to the Parties that did not appoint such member in connection with any act or omission by such member under this Agreement or any Associated Agreement. Each Party

15



agrees and acknowledges that each member of the Joint Development Committee shall be entitled to determine whether or not to take any action under this Agreement or any Associated Agreement by only considering the interests of the Party that designated such member to the Joint Development Committee and not the interests of the other Party.

(f)     In lieu of a meeting, any Party Operator may submit any proposal that is within the Joint Development Committee's powers to approve or disapprove (including any amendment to the then existing Development Plan or Annual Plan and Budget) to the Joint Development Committee for a vote by written notice. Such Party Operator shall provide a copy of any such proposal by written notice to the members of the Joint Development Committee. The members of the Joint Development Committee shall communicate their votes on the proposal by written notice to the submitting Party Operator within 14 days after receipt of the proposal from such Party Operator. If none of the representatives of a Party communicates their collective votes in a timely manner to such Party Operator, such representatives shall be deemed to have voted against such proposal. Promptly following the expiration of the relevant time period, the submitting Party Operator shall give each member of the Joint Development Committee a confirmation notice stating the tabulation and results of the vote on such proposal.

(g)     The Joint Development Committee may establish such subcommittees as it may deem appropriate, including a technical committee (whose purpose would be to advise the Party Operators with respect to the development of the Subject Assets, the coordination of Development Services, the selection of Third Party contractors, the terms of contracts for Development Operations and such other matters as the Joint Development Committee may direct). The functions of such subcommittees shall be to serve in an advisory capacity only. CONSOL and Noble shall each have the right to appoint an equal number of representatives to each subcommittee. The Joint Development Committee is hereby deemed to have established a HSE Committee (the “ HSE Committee ”) whose purpose shall be to (A) review violations of applicable health, safety and environmental Law by a Party Operator and (B) collaborate with each Party Operator to develop additional health, safety and environmental policies and programs in its Operated Area.

(h)     Notwithstanding anything else to the contrary in this Agreement, each of the following actions shall require the approval of the Joint Development Committee:

(i)     any amendment, modification or supplement to the Development Plan as provided in Section 3.2 ;

(ii)     the adoption of any Annual Plan and Budget and any amendment, modification or supplement to any Annual Plan and Budget as provided in Section 3.3 ;

(iii)     any allocation of, and any amendment, modification or supplement to the allocation of, Development Services to be provided by the Party Operators as provided in Section 2.11 ;

(iv)     any Affiliate Contract or a contract or agreement that contains a confidentiality obligation that would prevent such Party Operator from providing to the other Parties the data and reports required by Section 2.9(a) , in each case, to be entered into by a Party Operator as provided in Section 2.12(c) ;

(v)     subject to Section 2.11(d) , approval or modification to the calculation of Services Costs or the amount of the Marketing Fee as provided in Section 2.11(d) ;

(vi)     formation or dissolution of any subcommittee of the Joint Development Committee;

16




(vii)     approval of, and any amendment, modification or supplement to any previously approved, operating guidelines to be followed by the Party Operators in conducting Development Operations or Area-Wide Operations;

(viii)     any amendment, modification or supplement to the insurance standards required to be maintained by each of the Party Operators as provided in Section 2.8 or the reports to be provided by each of the Party Operators as provided in Section 2.9 ; and

(ix)     any modification to the number of secondees or the positions of such secondees under either the CONSOL Secondment Agreement or the Noble Secondment Agreement as applicable.

(i)     Each Party will designate a representative (the “ Party Representative ”) who will be the primary, but not exclusive, day-to-day point of contact for the other Party with respect to safety, operational, technical, production, financial, land, permitting, marketing and other matters under this Agreement and any Applicable Operating Agreement. Each Party Representative shall meet with the Party Representatives of the other Parties on a regular basis in person or by telephone to (i) discuss the status of such matters, (ii) identify and seek to resolve any issues that may arise with respect to such matters, and (iii) seek to enhance the safety, compliance, continuous improvement, production and costs of operations under this Agreement and any Applicable Operating Agreement. The initial Party Representative of CONSOL shall be J. Michael Onifer and the initial Party Representative of Noble shall be Barry Shelden, each of whose contact information is set forth in Section 11.2 ; provided that any Party may change its Party Representative or the contact information for its Party Representative by giving notice to the other Parties in accordance with Section 11.2 .

3.2     Development Plan .  

(a)     Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a multi-year development plan for Development Operations and Area-Wide Operations which the Parties currently anticipate to be conducted by the Party Operators through calendar year 2020 (as hereafter amended, modified or supplemented, the “ Development Plan ”). The Joint Development Committee shall have the sole right to amend, modify and supplement the Development Plan.

(b)     Each Development Plan shall, to the extent possible, include:

(i)
a forecast of the number of active rigs, the drilling days from spud to rig release including the expected time from rig release to first production, including estimates for stimulation/completion days and a forecast of all relevant capital and operational costs related to the foregoing;

(ii)     the sequence of development of the applicable Operated Area, to the extent known;

(iii)
a forecast of future production in four categories: (A) wells already on stream, (B) wells stimulated but not on stream, (C) wells drilled but not stimulated, and (D) wells to be drilled (wells on stream shall be forecasted on an individual performance basis (individual decline analysis) and all other wells shall be forecasted on an area basis based on expected performance for the relevant locations (pro-forma curves)).

(c)     Commencing in 2017 or earlier if the Parties mutually agree, on or before August 31 of each calendar year, each Party Operator shall, with respect to its Operated Area, prepare and submit to the Joint

17



Development Committee an amendment to the portion of the then existing Development Plan covering such Operated Area, which amendment sets forth the Development Operations and Area-Wide Operations reasonably expected to be carried out during the following three calendar years in such Operated Area. Following distribution of all amendments to the Development Plan from each of the Party Operators, the representatives of the Joint Development Committee shall have 30 days to furnish to the other members of the Joint Development Committee any proposed revisions they desire to make to the proposed amendments to the Development Plan. Promptly following the Joint Development Committee's 30-day review process, the Joint Development Committee shall meet to consider the amendments to the Development Plan and any recommendations made with respect thereto by any member of the Joint Development Committee and approve or reject such amendments to the Development Plan and such recommendations. In addition, the Joint Development Committee shall annually review the Development Plan in connection with its annual review and approval of the Annual Plan and Budget for the following calendar year and may from time to time amend or modify the Development Plan.

(d)     For the avoidance of doubt, any reference in this Agreement to the Development Plan shall mean the Development Plan attached hereto as Exhibit E , as such Development Plan may be amended from time to time by the Joint Development Committee pursuant to the terms hereof.

3.3     Annual Plan and Budgets .
  
(a) Attached hereto as Exhibit F is an annual development plan and budget for Development Operations and Area-Wide Operations which the Parties currently anticipate to be conducted by the Party Operators through calendar year 2012 (as hereafter amended, modified or supplemented, the “ Annual Plan and Budget ”). Each Party Operator shall, with respect to its Operated Area, be responsible for conducting the Development Operations and Area-Wide Operations that are contemplated by, and in accordance with, the then applicable Annual Plan and Budget covering such Operated Area. The Joint Development Committee shall have the sole right to amend, modify and supplement any Annual Plan and Budget.

(b) Other than with respect to calendar year 2011, on or before August 31 in the calendar year immediately preceding the relevant calendar year, each Party Operator shall, with respect to its Operated Area, prepare and submit to the Joint Development Committee that portion of a proposed Annual Plan and Budget for such relevant calendar year that pertains to such Operated Area. In preparing such portion of such proposed Annual Plan and Budget, each Party Operator shall prepare such Annual Plan and Budget in a manner consistent with the then current Development Plan for such relevant calendar year. Each such portion of such proposed Annual Plan and Budget submitted by a Party Operator shall contain at least the following with respect to the Operated Area of such Party Operator:

(i) all Development Operations and Area-Wide Operations that are expected to be conducted by such Party Operator in its Operated Area during such calendar year;

(ii) all lease maintenance costs and expenditures required under the terms of existing Leases or existing Third Party contracts held by a Party Operator for the benefit of Development Operations and Area-Wide Operations (including each Party's share thereof);

(iii) itemized estimates of the Development Costs (including each Party's share thereof including Carried Costs, separately stated, in the case of Noble) for Development Operations and Area-Wide Operations covered by the proposed Annual Plan and Budget by budget category containing sufficient detail, if available, to afford the ready identification of the nature, scope and duration of the activity in question;


18



(iv) the number of wells proposed to be drilled as part of the Development Operations and Area-Wide Operations during such calendar year, the areas for drilling groups of wells and proposed locations of such wells (to the extent reasonably ascertainable at the time such Annual Plan and Budget is proposed), and the estimated Development Costs (including each Party's share thereof) associated therewith;

(v) estimates of the schedule pursuant to which the Parties' Share of Development Costs for Development Operations and Area-Wide Operations included in the Annual Plan and Budget are anticipated to be incurred by the Parties;

(vi) estimated production for the applicable calendar year; and

(vii) any other information that a member of the Joint Development Committee reasonably requests to have included in such portion of such proposed Annual Plan and Budget.

Each Party Operator shall also provide to the Joint Development Committee any technical and interpretive data to support its proposed portion of the Annual Plan and Budget that any member of the Joint Development Committee may reasonably request.
(c) Following distribution of the applicable portion of the proposed Annual Plan and Budget from each of the Party Operators, the representatives of the Joint Development Committee shall have 30 days to furnish to the other members of the Joint Development Committee any proposed revisions they desire to make to such proposed Annual Plan and Budget. Promptly following the Joint Development Committee's 30-day review process, the Joint Development Committee shall meet to consider the proposed Annual Plan and Budget and any recommendations made with respect thereto by any member of the Joint Development Committee and approve or reject the proposed Annual Plan and Budget and such recommendations. In addition to annually submitting an Annual Plan and Budget to the Joint Development Committee, commencing in 2012, on or prior to June 30 of each calendar year, each Party Operator shall meet with the Joint Development Committee to review the then current Annual Plan and Budget to discuss any potential amendments or modifications to such Annual Plan and Budget for the remaining portion of such calendar year that may be proposed by the members of the Joint Development Committee or such Party Operator.

(d) Inclusion of an operation in an approved Annual Plan and Budget shall (unless and until such operation is removed from such Annual Plan and Budget pursuant to an amendment thereof): (i) bind all Parties to participate in such operation, and no Party shall have the right to make any nonconsent election under an Applicable Operating Agreement with respect to such operation; and (ii) subject to an occurrence of a Force Majeure Event affecting such operation, authorize the applicable Party Operator to propose and conduct such operation for the account of all of the Parties under the relevant Applicable Operating Agreement (provided that, to the extent any Third Party is a party to such Applicable Operating Agreement, a Party Operator shall propose such operation to such Third Party in accordance with the terms of such Applicable Operating Agreement, though, for the avoidance of doubt, such Party Operator need not re-propose such operation to the Parties but the Party Operator shall provide any AFEs required by the terms of the Applicable Operating Agreement to such Party, which shall be for informational purposes only) or under this Agreement in the case of an Area-Wide Operation.

(e) Subject to a Force Majeure Event that affects such Development Operations, each Party Operator shall be responsible for proposing, and shall conduct, Development Operations relating to its Operated Area that are contemplated in an Annual Plan and Budget under the Applicable Operating Agreement; provided that, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, no Party Operator shall have any liability for failing to commence operations to drill all of the wells set forth in the applicable

19



Annual Plan and Budget for any year for its Operated Area so long as such Party Operator proposes and commences the drilling of at least 95% of the wells contemplated to be drilled in an Annual Plan and Budget for its Operated Area for such year. Other than as provided in the preceding sentence or as provided in Section 3.3(g) , no Party or its Affiliates (including any Party Operator) shall propose Development Operations under any Applicable Operating Agreement. Other than with respect to Development Operations proposed by a Third Party Operator or a Third Party under an Applicable Operating Agreement, each Party hereby authorizes each Party Operator on its behalf to provide such notices, make such elections and take such actions as may reasonably be required under any Applicable Operating Agreement or any other Associated Agreement to implement the operations and activities contemplated by an approved Annual Plan and Budget in such Party Operator's Operated Area. In the event that an operation that is included in an approved Annual Plan and Budget is proposed by a Party Operator under an Applicable Operating Agreement and a Third Party to such Applicable Operating Agreement non-consents such proposal, then (i) if the Working Interest of the non-consenting Third Party with respect to such proposed operation is less than 50%, each Party shall be required to participate for its full Working Interest share of the Working Interest of such non-consenting Third Party and the applicable Party Operator shall make such elections, on behalf of each Party, as is necessary to implement the same and (ii) if the Working Interest of the non-consenting Third Party with respect to such proposed operation is 50% or more, each Party shall have the right to elect to participate for its full Working Interest share of the Working Interest of such non-consenting Third Party in accordance with the terms of the Applicable Operating Agreement; provided that if any Party elects not to participate for its full Working Interest share of the Working Interest of such non-consenting Third Party, the Party Operator shall have the option to withdraw its proposal for such Development Operation (and if the Party Operator withdraws such proposal, such Development Operation shall be deemed to have been removed from the Annual Plan and Budget).

(f) Each Party shall have the right to elect to participate or not to participate in any Development Operations proposed by a Third Party Operator or other Third Party pursuant to an Applicable Operating Agreement. Any such Development Operation in which less than all of such Parties elect to participate as permitted hereunder may be conducted by the Parties electing to participate in such Development Operation under the terms of the relevant Applicable Operating Agreement. Except as provided in Section 3.5 with respect to a Non-Consent Year, Noble's obligation to pay the Carried Costs on behalf of CONSOL in accordance with Section 7.1 shall not apply to Development Operations proposed by a Third Party Operator or other Third Parties pursuant to an Applicable Operating Agreement unless Noble is a participating party in such Development Operation.

(g) In the event that the Joint Development Committee fails to approve an Annual Plan and Budget for a particular calendar year on or prior to December 15 of the year preceding such particular calendar year (for purposes of this Section 3.3(g) , such particular year for which the Joint Development Committee fails to approve an Annual Plan and Budget, the “ relevant calendar year ”), the Joint Development Committee shall be deemed to have approved an Annual Plan and Budget for such relevant calendar year that includes the following: (i) all Development Operations and Area-Wide Operations that were previously commenced pursuant to an approved Annual Plan and Budget in a prior calendar year and not completed in such prior calendar year; (ii) the wells scheduled to be drilled during the relevant calendar year as set forth in the Development Plan, if any, and the associated Development Costs reasonably expected to be required to implement such Development Operations (regardless of estimated amounts set forth in the Development Plan); (iii) all actual Operating Expenses relating to the subject assets and incurred during the relevant calendar year; (iv) Services Costs and overhead rates and Marketing Fees (and related Third Party expenses) in accordance with Section 2.11 (provided that if the Services Costs or Marketing Fee (as applicable) are not then approved by the Joint Development Committee or determined by an expert pursuant to Section 2.11(d) , then until so approved or determined, such cost or fee shall be equal to the Services Costs or Marketing Fee

20



(as applicable) for the preceding calendar year); (v) existing payment commitments to Third Parties under Leases and binding contracts with respect to the Subject Assets; and (vi) taxes payable with respect to the Subject Assets by a Party Operator under the terms of any Applicable Operating Agreement. In the event that any Development Operation scheduled to be performed during any calendar year is not commenced during such calendar year, then the Development Plan shall automatically be amended to add such Development Operation to the Development Plan to be conducted in the year following the year in which the Development Plan would have otherwise expired and the Development Plan shall be automatically extended for such period of time as is reasonably necessary for the applicable Party Operator to conduct such Development Operation.

(h) Subject to Section 7.1 and subject to the applicable Annual Plan and Budget (as modified by Section 3.3(i) ), each Party shall be responsible for such Party's Share of Development Costs, including its Share of Development Costs for operations conducted by a Party Operator in accordance with Section 3.3(j). Subject to Section 7.1 , each Party shall pay or advance its Share of Development Costs in accordance with Section 7.2 . For the avoidance of doubt, no Party shall be obligated to participate in acquisitions of Leases included in an Annual Plan and Budget (other than Fill-In Interests), if any, but instead shall have the right but not the obligation to participate in such acquisitions pursuant to ARTICLE V .

(i) Approval by the Joint Development Committee of an Annual Plan and Budget shall constitute the Joint Development Committee's deemed approval for any Party Operator to expend up to 20% in excess of the authorized amount applicable to its operations in its Operated Area within each Annual Plan and Budget category, not to exceed in the aggregate 10% of the aggregate amount applicable to such operations in such Annual Plan and Budget. Each Party Operator shall promptly notify the Joint Development Committee of any expenditure made by it in the exercise of its rights pursuant to this Section 3.3(i) . The deemed approval levels set forth in this Section 3.3(i) shall be calculated with respect to the original amount of an Annual Plan and Budget or, once amended, the amended amount of the Annual Plan and Budget, provided that no expenditures incurred pursuant to Section 3.3(j) shall be deemed to be included in an approved Annual Plan and Budget for purposes of calculating the deemed approval levels pursuant to this Section 3.3(i) , nor shall any such expenditures be considered to be amounts expended in excess of the authorized amount of any Annual Plan and Budget for purposes of calculating the deemed approval levels set forth in this Section 3.3(i) .

(j) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, each Party Operator is expressly authorized to make expenditures and incur liabilities when it reasonably determines that such expenditures or incurrences are necessary or advisable to deal with emergencies, including well blowouts, fires, oil spills, or any other similar event, which may endanger property, lives, or the environment. Each Party Operator shall as soon as practicable report to the Parties the nature of any such emergency which arises, the measures it intends to take or has taken in respect of such emergency and the estimated related expenditures.

(k) To the extent reasonably within the control of any Party Operator conducting any Development Operation and subject to any Force Majeure Event affecting such Development Operation, each Development Operation shall be conducted at approximately the time prescribed in the applicable Annual Plan and Budget.

(l) For the avoidance of doubt, any reference in this Agreement to an Annual Plan and Budget in connection with any operations, rights or obligations shall mean an Annual Plan and Budget that is approved or deemed to have been approved by the Joint Development Committee, including all amendments to such Annual Plan and Budgets that are approved (or deemed approved) by the Joint Development Committee pursuant to the terms hereof.


21



3.4     AFEs . Prior to any Party Operator (a) spudding any well included in the Annual Plan and Budget, or (b) making any expenditure that is included in the Annual Plan and Budget and that is estimated to cost in excess of $500,000, such Party Operator shall submit an AFE to the Parties covering such well or expenditure for information purposes only.

3.5     Non-Consent Years . Notwithstanding any other provision in this Agreement to the contrary, subject and pursuant to the terms and provisions of this Section 3.5 , each of Noble and CONSOL shall have the right (the “ Non-Consent Right ”) to elect to non-consent all (but not less than all) wells to be drilled in the Development Area under the Annual Plan and Budget deemed approved pursuant to Section 3.3(g) during a Non-Consent Year in the event that the Joint Development Committee fails to approve an Annual Plan and Budget for such Non-Consent Year.

(a)     Non-Consent Right .

(i) Commencing in calendar year 2013, on or prior to December 20 of any calendar year, either Noble or CONSOL may exercise its Non-Consent Right with respect to the following calendar year (such following calendar year, the “ Non-Consent Year ”) by giving written notice of the same to all other Parties. For clarity, no calendar year prior to 2014 can be a Non-Consent Year. For clarity, a Party electing to exercise the Non-Consent Right shall be entitled to elect to participate in any wells that are not included in the Annual Plan and Budget for the Non-Consent Year (being the Annual Plan and Budget deemed approved pursuant to Section 3.3(g) ) proposed to be drilled by a Third Party Operator or Third Party under any Applicable Operating Agreement in the Non-Consent Year on a well-by-well basis.

(ii) If either Noble or CONSOL (the “ Non-Consenting Party ”) exercises its Non-Consent Right for a Non-Consent Year, then (A) such Non-Consenting Party shall not be entitled or obligated to conduct, propose or otherwise participate in any wells included in the Annual Plan and Budget for the Non-Consent Year (being the Annual Plan and Budget deemed approved pursuant to Section 3.3(g) ) for which drilling operations are commenced in the Development Area during the Non-Consent Year and (B) the other Party (the “ Electing Party ”) shall have the right (but not the obligation, notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary) to propose and drill each of the wells scheduled pursuant to the Development Plan to be drilled during such Non-Consent Year (such wells proposed where drilling operations are commenced, the “ Non-Consent Wells ”). For clarity, the Electing Party shall not be required to drill any or all of the Non-Consent Wells and it can choose which Non-Consent Well(s) to drill during such Non-Consent Year and when such Non-Consent Wells should be drilled.

(iii) The Electing Party will have the right to become operator with respect to any Non-Consent Wells commenced during the Non-Consent Year (including becoming operator with respect to any Non-Consent Wells commenced in the Non-Consenting Party's Operated Area). The Non-Consenting Party will use commercially reasonable efforts to assist the Electing Party to become operator with respect to such Non-Consent Wells. The Non-Consenting Party will also serve as a contract operator for the Electing Party, if the Electing Party is unable to takeover as operator with respect to any Non-Consent Well where the Non-Consenting Party is already designated as operator. The Non-Consenting Party will transfer to the Electing Party those agreements that the Electing Party needs to operate such Non-Consent Wells or, if such agreements are not transferable, hold such agreements for the benefit of the Electing Party.

(iv) With respect to each Non-Consent Well that is commenced during the Non-Consent Year, the non-consent penalties set forth in the Applicable Operating Agreement for such Non-Consent Well shall be applicable to the Non-Consenting Party.


22



(v) The Non-Consenting Party shall be solely responsible for any payment requirements (the “ Non-Terminable Contract Obligations ”) resulting from the Parties not satisfying their obligations under any non-terminable (without fee payment) contract relating to the Subject Assets during the Non-Consent Year (the “ Non-Terminable Contracts ”); provided that if in connection with its Development Operations during the Non-Consent Year the Electing Party does not actually incur at least an amount equal to 67% of the actual costs and expenses relating to drilling and completing wells that such Electing Party was projected to incur (after taking into account Noble's obligation to pay the Carried Costs for such wells) pursuant to the Annual Plan and Budget for such Non-Consent Year (being the Annual Plan and Budget deemed approved pursuant to Section 3.3(g) ), then, within 15 days following the end of such Non-Consent Year, the Electing Party shall reimburse the Non-Consent Party for its Participating Interest share of all actual amounts paid by the Non-Consenting Party with respect to the Non-Terminable Contract Obligations and shall thereafter be responsible for paying its Participating Interest share of all Non-Terminable Contract Obligations. During a Non-Consent Year, the Parties shall each use their commercially reasonable efforts to mitigate any payment requirements under any Non-Terminable Contracts at the sole cost and expense of the Non-Consent Party; provided that the Electing Party shall not be required to conduct any Development Operations to satisfy its obligations to mitigate such payment requirements.

(vi) In the event that any wells scheduled pursuant to the Development Plan for such Non-Consent Year are not Non-Consent Wells, then the Development Plan shall automatically be amended to add such wells that are not Non-Consent Wells to the Development Plan to be conducted in the year following the year in which the Development Plan would have otherwise expired and the Development Plan shall be automatically extended for such period of time as is reasonably necessary for the applicable Party Operator to conduct such Development Operation.

(b)     Carried Costs . If Noble is the Non-Consenting Party, then:

(i) On or prior to January 1 of the Non-Consent Year, Noble must advance to the Tax Partnership Account designated and controlled (subject to the obligation of CONSOL to withdraw such funds only to pay for specific costs of the Non-Consent Year's drilling program) by CONSOL (the “ Non-Consent Account ”) the total amount of the Carried Costs that are contemplated by the Development Plan for the Non-Consent Year (the “ Carried Costs Amount ”), which funds may thereafter be solely utilized for the purposes described in Section 3.5(b)(ii) or 3.5(c)(ii) . The Parties acknowledge that such funds in the Non-Consent Account discharge Noble's obligations to pay Carried Costs during such Non-Consent Year. Notwithstanding the fact that Noble has no right to the return of such funds once they are paid into such Non-Consent Account, interest in such funds shall be allocated and distributed 50% to CONSOL and 50% to Noble. Except for payment under this Section 3.5(b) of the Carried Costs Amount, Noble shall have no other obligation to pay any Carried Costs during the Non-Consent Year.

(ii) With respect to any Non-Consent Well or any other well proposed by a Third Party under an Applicable Operating Agreement that is actually spudded during the Non-Consent Year in which CONSOL participates, notwithstanding anything in Section 7.1(b) to the contrary, CONSOL shall pay out of the Non-Consent Account (until expended) two-thirds of CONSOL's Working Interest share of all Drilling and Completion Costs with respect to such wells (and all such Drilling and Completion Costs that are funded pursuant to this Section 3.5(b)(ii) shall be deemed to be Carried Costs for all purposes hereunder).

(iii) The provisions of Section 7.1(d) shall not be applicable during any Non-Consent Year.

(c)     Following a Non-Consent Year .


23



(i) To the extent that any Non-Consent Wells were commenced by the Electing Party in the Operated Area of the Non-Consenting Party, then the Non-Consenting Party will take over as operator with respect to each such Non-Consent Well as promptly as practicable following the later to occur of (A) the end of such Non-Consent Year and (B) the date upon which all drilling and completion operations with respect to such Non-Consent Well have been completed, and the Electing Party will use commercially reasonable efforts to assist the Non-Consenting Party to become operator with respect to each such Non-Consent Well.

(ii) If any portion of the Carried Costs Amount is not fully used to pay the costs set forth in Section 3.5(b) during the Non-Consent Year, then following such Non-Consent Year the funds remaining in the Non-Consent Account shall be used to satisfy Noble's obligation to pay Carried Costs and Noble shall not have any obligation to pay any additional amounts in respect of the Carried Costs incurred in following years until all such funds have been so expended.

(d)     Limited Right . Neither Noble nor CONSOL may exercise its Non-Consent Right if such Party also exercised its Non-Consent Right with respect to the calendar year immediately preceding the Non-Consent Year. A Party shall only be permitted to exercise the Non-Consent Right twice during the term of this Agreement.

ARTICLE IV
TRANSFER RESTRICTIONS

4.1 Restrictions on Transfer .
  
(a) Transfers by CONSOL and its Affiliates .

(i) Subject to Sections 4.1(c) through (f), 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4 , prior to the thirty-month anniversary of the Closing Date, CONSOL shall not, and shall cause any of its Affiliates holding any Joint Development Interest not to, Transfer all or any portion of their Joint Development Interests (other than a Transfer of an Immaterial Interest) or undergo a Change in Control without the prior written consent of Noble (which may be granted or withheld in Noble's sole discretion).

(ii) Subject to Sections 4.1(c) through (f), 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4 , from and after the thirty-month anniversary of the Closing Date, CONSOL and its Affiliates holding any Joint Development Interest shall be permitted to Transfer all or any undivided portion of their Joint Development Interests to any Person that as of the date of such Transfer has the financial ability to perform the future payment obligations hereunder and under the Associated Agreements with respect thereto, or undergo a Change in Control; provided that upon a Transfer where CONSOL intends that the transferee will become CONSOL Operator or upon such a Change in Control, Noble Operator shall be entitled to take over as CONSOL Operator under this Agreement and each Applicable Operating Agreement unless such transferee establishes to Noble's reasonable satisfaction that it has the technical ability and experience to serve as CONSOL Operator.

(b) Transfers by Noble and its Affiliates .

(i) Subject to Sections 4.1(c) through (f), 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4 , prior to the later to occur of: (A) the thirty-month anniversary of the Closing Date and (B) the Carry Termination Event Noble shall not, and shall cause any of its Affiliates holding any Joint Development Interest not to, Transfer all or any portion of their Joint Development Interests (other than a Transfer of an Immaterial Interest) and Noble shall not permit any of its Affiliates holding any Joint Development Interest to undergo a Change in Control unless

24



the prior written consent of CONSOL to such otherwise prohibited Transfer or Change in Control (which may be granted or withheld in CONSOL's sole discretion) is first obtained.

(ii) Subject to Sections 4.1(c) through (f), 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4 , from and after the later to occur of: (A) the thirty-month anniversary of the Closing Date and (B) the Carry Termination Event, Noble and its Affiliates holding any Joint Development Interest shall be permitted to Transfer all or any undivided portion of their Joint Development Interests to any Person that as of the date of such Transfer has the financial ability to perform the future payment obligations hereunder and under the Associated Agreements with respect thereto, or undergo a Change in Control; provided that upon a Transfer where Noble intends that the transferee will become Noble Operator or upon such a Change in Control, CONSOL Operator shall be entitled to take over as Noble Operator under this Agreement and each Applicable Operating Agreement unless such transferee establishes to CONSOL's reasonable satisfaction that it has the technical ability and experience to serve as Noble Operator.

(c) Permitted Transfers . Notwithstanding the restrictions on Transfer set forth in Sections 4.1(a) or 4.1(b) , but subject to the requirements of Sections 4.1(e) and 4.2 , (i) any Party and its Affiliates may Transfer all or an undivided portion of their Joint Development Interests (including the Tax Partnership) to any Affiliate of any Party (provided such Affiliate will be bound by all the provisions hereof as if it was the original party hereto), (ii) CONSOL and its Affiliates may encumber all or a portion of their Joint Development Interests solely for financing purposes and (iii) Noble and its Affiliates may encumber all or a portion of their Joint Development Interests that have become Developed Assets solely for financing purposes; provided, however, that no such Transfer of any Joint Development Interests as permitted under this Section 4.1(c) shall relieve such transferring Person of any of its or its Affiliates' obligations under this Agreement or, unless specifically provided otherwise, any Associated Agreement (whether accruing prior to or after the date of such Transfer). Notwithstanding Sections 4.1(a) , 4.1(b) or 4.1(d) to the contrary, any Transfer by a Party to an Affiliate of such Party shall be deemed pursuant to and subject to this Section 4.1(c) .

(d) Liability of Transferor/Transferee . No Transfer of any Joint Development Interests as permitted under Section 4.1(a) or 4.1(b) shall relieve the transferring Person of any of its or its Affiliates' obligations under this Agreement or any Associated Agreement except to the extent of obligations incurred from and after such Transfer under this Agreement and all Associated Agreements to the extent related to the interests transferred to such Person, which obligations such transferring Person shall be released from to the extent assumed by such transferee unless, in the case of the Associated Agreements, otherwise specifically provided therein.

(e) Transfers by Defaulting Parties . No Defaulting Party may, and any Defaulting Party shall cause its Affiliates not to, Transfer all or any part of its Joint Development Interest or undergo a Change in Control unless and until the Total Amount in Default is paid by such Defaulting Party or its transferee or any other Person on behalf of such Defaulting Party and then further subject to compliance with the other provisions of this ARTICLE IV .

(f) Transfers in Violation of this ARTICLE IV . Any Transfer or attempted Transfer or Change in Control in violation of this ARTICLE IV shall be, and is hereby declared, null and void ab initio.

4.2 Documentation for Transfers . Any Transfer (other than a Transfer of an Immaterial Interest or a Transfer permitted under Section 4.1(c)(i) ) by any Party that is otherwise permitted pursuant to Section 4.1 shall not be effective unless and until the other Parties have received a document executed by both the transferring Party (or its legal representative) and the permitted transferee (or its legal representative) that includes: (a) the notice address of the permitted transferee; (b) such permitted transferee's express agreement

25



in writing to (i) be bound by all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement and any applicable Associated Agreement and (ii) assume an undivided interest (in an amount equal to the Participating Interest being Transferred to the permitted transferee) of all of the liabilities and obligations of the transferring Party under this Agreement and any applicable Associated Agreements (which may be limited to the liabilities and obligations arising from and after the effective time of the assignment); (c) a description of the Participating Interests in the Subject Assets being Transferred by the transferring Party and the permitted transferee immediately following the Transfer; and (d) representations and warranties to the other Parties from both the transferring Party and the permitted transferee that the Transfer was made in accordance with applicable Law (including state and federal securities Law) and the terms and conditions of this Agreement and any applicable Associated Agreements. Each permitted Transfer shall be effective against the other Parties as of the first Business Day of the calendar month immediately following the other Parties' receipt of the document required by this Section 4.2 .

4.3 Maintenance of Uniform Interest . For the purpose of maintaining uniformity of ownership in the Development Area as among the Parties, from and after the Closing Date during the term of this Agreement, no Party shall Transfer any portion of its Joint Development Interest (other than a Transfer of an Immaterial Interest or a Transfer permitted under Section 4.1(c)(i) ) unless such Transfer covers the entirety of such Party's Joint Development Interest, or an undivided percentage thereof. Any Transfer of an undivided portion of a Party's Joint Development Interest shall also include a proportionate share of the transferring Party's rights and obligations in and under this Agreement and any applicable Associated Agreement.

4.4 Right of First Offer .

(a) Subject to Section 4.1 , if a Party or any of its Affiliates (each such Person, a “ Transferor ”) desires to Transfer to a Third Party (either directly or indirectly through a Change in Control but excluding Transfers of the types described in Section 4.1(c) and a Transfer of an Immaterial Interest) all or any portion of the Transferor's Joint Development Interest, the Transferor shall give to the other Parties (the “ ROFO Parties ”) written notice (“ ROFO Notice ”) stating the Transferor's desire to effect such Transfer, the Joint Development Interest to be Transferred (the “ Offered Interest ”) and the terms and conditions on which the Transferor proposes to Transfer the Offered Interest; provided, however, that if the consideration set forth in such ROFO Notice contemplates any non-cash consideration, the ROFO Parties shall be entitled to pay in lieu of such non-cash consideration, cash in an amount equal to the Fair Market Value of such non-cash consideration unless the ROFO Parties and Transferor agree to some other form of consideration. The ROFO Parties shall have the right but not the obligation to elect to acquire such Offered Interest on the terms and conditions set forth in the ROFO Notice. The ROFO Notice shall constitute a binding offer (the “ ROFO Offer ”) by the Transferor to Transfer to the ROFO Parties the Offered Interest at the price and upon the terms specified in the ROFO Notice and such offer shall be irrevocable for 30 days following receipt by the ROFO Parties. Any ROFO Party may accept such ROFO Offer and acquire all but not less than all of the Offered Interest by giving written notice of the same to the Transferor within such 30-day period; provided that if more than one ROFO Party accepts such ROFO Offer then, unless such ROFO Parties otherwise agree, each ROFO Party shall acquire a pro rata portion of the Offered Interest based on the relative Participating Interests of each accepting ROFO Party. The failure by any ROFO Party to so notify the Transferor within such 30-day period shall be deemed an election by such ROFO Party not to accept such ROFO Offer.

(b) If one or more ROFO Parties accepts the ROFO Offer, then the Transferor and such accepting ROFO Parties shall cooperate together to consummate the Transfer of the Offered Interest to the ROFO Parties as promptly as practicable following such acceptance.

(c) If none of the ROFO Parties accepts the ROFO Offer, then the Transferor may Transfer all

26



but not less than all of the Offered Interest at any time within 180 days following the end of the 30-day period that the ROFO Parties had to accept the ROFO Offer. Any such Transfer shall be at a price not less than the price set forth in the ROFO Notice and on such other terms and conditions not more favorable in any material respect to the acquiring party than those specified in the ROFO Notice. If the Transferor does not affect such Transfer within such 180-day period, the Transfer of the Offered Interest shall again become subject to the right of first offer set forth in this Section 4.4 .


ARTICLE V
AREA OF MUTUAL INTEREST

5.1 Creation of Area of Mutual Interest . Subject to Section 10.2(5) , the Parties agree that for a period beginning on the Closing Date and ending on the 25th anniversary thereof, the Development Area shall be an area of mutual interest as described in Exhibit A-1 . For clarity, in general this Agreement only applies to Subject Assets covering depths within the Marcellus Formation, but with respect to any Fill-In Interest or Option Interest to be acquired pursuant to this ARTICLE V , such Fill-In Interest and/or Option Interest shall include all depths that have been or are being acquired by the acquiring Party or Acquiring Party, as applicable. In the event a Fill-In Interest or an Option Interest is acquired pursuant to this ARTICLE V , only the portion of such Fill-In Interest or Option Interest that covers depths within the Marcellus Formation shall thereafter be subject to the terms and provisions of this Agreement and the depths outside the Marcellus Formation shall not be subject to the terms of this Agreement. Further for clarity, if a Party or any of its Affiliates, directly or indirectly, acquires a Lease or related asset in the Development Area that does not cover any depths within the Marcellus Formation, then such acquisition shall not be subject to the terms of this ARTICLE V or the other terms of this Agreement.

5.2 Acquisition of Fill-In Interests for Drilling Units in the Development Area . Although it is anticipated that only a Party Operator will acquire Fill-In Interests in such Party Operator's Operated Area, if, after the date hereof, any Party or any of its Affiliates, directly or indirectly (including by merger, acquisition of equity or otherwise), acquires any additional Leases and related assets within the Development Area covering at least depths within the Marcellus Formation that completes or increases their Working Interest in a Drilling Unit covering existing Subject Assets (a “ Fill-In Interest ”), then such Party will promptly provide written notice to the other Parties of such acquisition, including the material terms and conditions of such acquisition (excluding any terms dealing solely with assets not within the Development Area). Within 30 days after such notice is delivered to the other Parties, such other Parties shall purchase their individual Participating Interest share of such Fill-In Interests from such acquiring Party or its Affiliate. At the closing of such purchase, (a) each purchasing Party will be required to (i) except for obligations assumed pursuant to clause (ii) below, pay in cash to the acquiring Party (or its Affiliate) its Participating Interest share of the Acquisition Costs that the acquiring Party (or its Affiliate) incurred in acquiring such Fill-In Interest, together with interest thereon at the Agreed Rate from the date on which the acquiring Party (or its Affiliate) acquired the Fill-In Interest to the date of such payment and (ii) if the Fill-In Interest is acquired pursuant to a farmout agreement or similar agreement requiring the drilling of a well or the performance of other similar obligations, subject to Section 7.1 , assume its Participating Interest share of all obligations required to be performed by the applicable acquiring Party or its Affiliates to earn such Fill-In Interest and (b) the acquiring Party (or its Affiliate) shall deliver to such other Parties their respective individual Participating Interest share of the Fill-In Interests on the same terms and conditions as the acquiring Party (or its Affiliate) acquired the Fill-In Interests (with such changes as may be necessitated by the differences in the parties, the transfer of only the Fill-In Interests and, if applicable, the payment of the Fair Market Value in lieu of other consideration or the apportionment of rights from a Package Sale); provided that, except for a special warranty of title covering the acquiring Party's (or its Affiliate's) period of ownership, the acquiring Party shall in no event have any

27



liability to the other Parties for representations, warranties or indemnities with respect to the Fill-In Interest in excess of the Parties' Participating Interest shares of amounts that the acquiring Party (or its Affiliate) actually recovers from the Person from whom it acquired the Fill-In Interest. The costs of recording the assignment of each Party's interest in Fill-In Interests in the real property records of the appropriate county or township as applicable shall be chargeable to the joint account under the Applicable Operating Agreement.

5.3 Acquisition of Option Interests in the Development Area .  

(a) If, after the date hereof, a Party or any of its Affiliates, directly or indirectly (including by merger, acquisition of equity or otherwise), acquires or seeks to acquire any additional Leases and related assets within the Development Area covering at least depths within the Marcellus Formation (other than any Fill-In Interest) (such Person, the “ Acquiring Party ”), then the Acquiring Party (i) will in the case of any acquisition that has already taken place and (ii) may in the case of any proposed acquisition promptly provide written notice (the “ Acquisition Notice ”) to the other Parties (the “ Non-Acquiring Parties ”) of such acquisition or proposed acquisition, as applicable, including the material terms and conditions (excluding any terms dealing solely with assets not within the Development Area) of such acquisition and a description of the Leases and related assets that are being or has been acquired (the “ Option Interests ”). Within 30 days after such Acquisition Notice is delivered to the Non-Acquiring Parties (the “ Election Period ”), the Non-Acquiring Parties will have the option to acquire (i) all, but not less than all, of their Participating Interest share of such Option Interests and (ii) all, but not less than all, of their Participating Interest share of any portion of the Option Interests that any Non-Acquiring Parties elect not to acquire in accordance with this Section 5.3(a) , in each case, on the same terms and conditions on which the Acquiring Party acquired or will acquire the Option Interests by providing written notice of such election to the Acquiring Party. If a Non-Acquiring Party fails to exercise its option within such 30-day period, such Non-Acquiring Party shall be deemed to have made an election not to participate.

(b) If any of the Non-Acquiring Parties elect to participate in accordance with Section 5.3(a) , such Non-Acquiring Parties shall purchase their share of the Option Interests from the Acquiring Party within 30 days of its election in the case of any acquisition that has already taken place, or in the case of a proposed acquisition, at the closing of such acquisition (or as promptly as practicable thereafter as the Acquiring Party may reasonably determine) (such date, the “ Payment Date ”). At the closing of such purchase (an “ AMI Purchase Date ”), (i) such Non-Acquiring Parties will be required to (A) except for obligations assumed pursuant to clause (B) below, pay to the Acquiring Party (or to such other Person as the Acquiring Party may designate) its share of the Acquisition Costs in proportion to the interest in the Option Interests it is acquiring in cash, together with interest thereon at the Agreed Rate from the date on which the Acquiring Party acquired the Option Interests (if earlier than the Payment Date) to the Payment Date and (B) if the Option Interest is acquired pursuant to a farmout agreement or similar agreement requiring the drilling of a well or the performance of other similar obligations, subject to Section 7.1 , assume its share of all obligations required to be performed by the Acquiring Party or its Affiliates to earn such Option Interest and (ii) the Acquiring Party shall deliver to such Non-Acquiring Parties their respective interests in the Option Interests on the same terms and conditions as such Acquiring Party is or has acquired its interest in the Option Interests (with such changes as may be necessitated by the differences in the parties, the transfer of only the Option Interests and, if applicable, the payment of the Fair Market Value in lieu of other consideration or the apportionment of rights from a Package Sale); provided that, except for a special warranty of title covering the Acquiring Party's period of ownership, the Acquiring Party shall in no event have any liability to the Non-Acquiring Parties for representations, warranties or indemnities with respect to the Option Interest in excess of the Non-Acquiring Parties' Participating Interest shares of amounts that the Acquiring Party actually recovers from the Person from whom it acquired the Option Interest. Each Non-Acquiring Party will be responsible for and will pay the costs of recording the assignment of its interest in the Option Interests in the real property

28



records of the appropriate county or township as applicable.

(c) If all of the Non-Acquiring Parties elect not to participate in accordance with Section 5.3(a) , the Acquiring Party will retain 100% of the Option Interests and such Option Interests will be excluded from the Development Area and will not be governed by the terms of this Agreement or any Applicable Operating Agreement.

(d) If an Acquiring Party acquires or seeks to acquire any Lease that lies partially within and partially outside of the Development Area, then the entirety of such Lease shall be deemed to be an Option Interest and if one or more Non-Acquiring Parties elects to acquire an interest in such Lease, the Development Area (and the applicable Operated Area to which such Lease relates) shall automatically be amended to include the entirety of such Lease. The Parties shall memorialize in writing any such amendment to the Development Area and any Operated Area.

(e) For avoidance of doubt, the Additional Interests shall be treated as “Fill-In Interests” or “Option Interests,” as applicable, for purposes of this Agreement in accordance with the Acquisition Agreement, and CONSOL shall offer the Additional Interests to Noble within 15 days following the Closing Date in accordance with the terms of this Section 5.3 .

(f) Each Party shall cause its Affiliates to comply with the terms of this ARTICLE V.

5.4 Exceptions .
  
(a) Notwithstanding anything in this ARTICLE V to the contrary, the provisions of this ARTICLE V shall not apply to (i) any acquisition of a Lease or related asset by CONSOL or its Affiliates for the purpose of curing a title defect in accordance with the Acquisition Agreement or (ii) any indirect acquisition by a Party or its Affiliates of any Lease and related assets by the acquisition of an entity having at least 75% (by Fair Market Value) of its assets outside of the Development Area; provided that such indirect acquisition of such Lease(s) and related assets is not made with the intention of circumventing the provisions of this Article V .

(b) Notwithstanding anything in this ARTICLE V to the contrary, in the event that, during the period in which the provisions of this ARTICLE V are applicable to the Parties, a Party or its Affiliates acquires more than $50,000,000 (by Fair Market Value) of Option Interests, in a single transaction or series of related transactions, in exchange for cash or assets and the Acquiring Party specifies in its Acquisition Notice that such Acquiring Party is acquiring such Option Interest through a like kind exchange (as provided for under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and the regulations thereto), then the following provisions of this Section 5.4(b) shall also apply to such acquisition (and to the extent of any conflict between Section 3.5 and this Section 5.4(b) , this Section 5.4(b) shall control):

(i) The Election Period shall not begin until the Acquiring Party provides the Non-Acquiring Parties with written notice in accordance with this Section 5.4(b)(i) , which the Acquiring Party shall be required to provide to the Non-Acquiring Parties within 5 Business Days following the end of the 3-month anniversary of the date on which such Party and/or Affiliate completes such like kind exchange. Such notice from the Acquiring Party to the Non-Acquiring Parties shall include (A) the material terms and conditions (excluding any terms dealing solely with assets not within the Development Area) of such acquisition, (B) a description of the Option Interests, (C) a description of all drilling, completing, deepening, sidetracking, reworking and plugging and abandoning operations that have been conducted with respect to the Option Interests since the Acquiring Party acquired such Option Interests or are contemplated to be

29



completed through the end of the Election Period, (D) copies of all written notices of claims made by or against the Acquiring Party relating to the Option Interests, (E) copies of all environmental assessment in the possession of or under the control of the Acquiring Party relating to the Option Interests and (F) an estimated preliminary settlement statement reflecting the Acquisition Costs of the Option Interests (as adjusted pursuant to Section 5.4(b)(ii) .

(ii) If the Non-Acquiring Parties elect to participate in accordance with Section 5.3(a) , then on the AMI Purchase Date, (A) such Non-Acquiring Parties will be required to pay to the Acquiring Party (or to such other Person as the Acquiring Party may designate) its share of the Acquisition Costs in proportion to the interest in such Option Interests it is acquiring in cash (with such adjustments to such Acquisition Costs (including capital expenditures and lease operating expenses) as may be necessitated by the fact that development and other operations may have occurred with respect to such Option Interests since the date such Option Interests were acquired by the Acquiring Party) and (B) the Acquiring Party shall deliver to such Non-Acquiring Parties their respective interests in such Option Interests with special warranty of title by, through and under the Acquiring Party and otherwise on the same terms and conditions as such Acquiring Party is or has acquired its interest in such Option Interests (with such changes as may be necessitated by the differences in the parties, the fact that operations have occurred with respect to such Option Interests, the transfer of only such Option Interests and, if applicable, the payment of the Fair Market Value in lieu of other consideration or the apportionment of rights from a Package Sale).

(iii) The Non-Acquiring Parties shall not be charged any interest on the Acquisition Costs.

(iv) Beginning on the date that such Option Interests are acquired by the Acquiring Party until the earlier of (A) the AMI Purchase Date and (B) the date upon which the Non-Acquiring Party elects (or is deemed to have elected) not to participate (the “ Restricted Period ”), each Non-Acquiring Party shall be entitled to receive the same reports and information relating to, and shall have the same access to, such Option Interests as if such Option Interests were Subject Assets hereunder and such Non-Acquiring Party held an interest therein (including all AFEs required by Section 3.4 ).

(v) During the Restricted Period, except as permitted under this ARTICLE V , the Acquiring Party shall not, and shall cause its Affiliates not to, Transfer all or any portion of the Option Interests to any Person.

(vi) During the Restricted Period, the Acquiring Party shall, and shall cause its Affiliates to, consult with the Non-Acquiring Party prior to conducting any drilling operations on the Option Interests (other than drilling operations that have been commenced prior to the Acquiring Party's acquisition of the Option Interests).

(vii) For clarity, the “Option Interests” as used in this Section 5.4(b) shall include any improvements made to, or equipment or other property acquired by, such Acquiring Party in connection with any operations conducted upon the Leases included in the Option Interests after the date the original Option Interests are acquired by such Acquiring Party.

(viii) Unless and until the AMI Purchase Date occurs, only the Acquiring Party (and not the Non-Acquiring Parties) shall be entitled to the benefits and burdens of the Option Interests.



30



ARTICLE VI
TAXES

6.1 Tax Partnership . The Parties intend and expect that the transactions contemplated by the Acquisition Agreement, this Agreement and the Associated Agreements, taken together, will be treated, for purposes of federal income taxation and for purposes of certain state income tax laws that incorporate or follow federal income tax principles (“ Tax Purposes ”), as resulting in the creation of a partnership (the “ Tax Partnership ”) in which Noble and CONSOL are treated as partners. Accordingly, for Tax Purposes, (a) the Tax Partnership will be treated as (i) holding (A) the Parties' interests in Oil and Gas Assets, (B) any other Subject Assets and (C) any cash held in any account identified or otherwise treated as being an asset of the Tax Partnership resulting from production or contribution pursuant to the Asset Acquisition Agreement or this Agreement and (ii) engaging in all activities of the Parties with respect to the Subject Assets, (b) CONSOL will be treated as contributing to the Tax Partnership at Closing of the Oil and Gas Assets and its undertaking to fund, when due, the costs and expenses allocable to it under this Agreement in exchange for an interest in the Tax Partnership; (c) Noble will be treated as contributing to the Tax Partnership at Closing (by deposit into the Cost Reconciliation Account) the Closing Cash Payment (as adjusted), its undertaking to fund, when due, the Post Closing Cash Payments and the costs and expenses allocable to it under this Agreement (including the Carried Costs, any Carried Costs Amount and any Carried Costs Balance Payments) in exchange for an interest in the Tax Partnership; (d) upon any withdrawal by CONSOL (as and to the extent permitted under Section 7.6 hereof) of the Total Cost Sharing Payments from the Cost Reconciliation Account, CONSOL will be treated as receiving distributions from the Tax Partnership of the withdrawn amounts (i) as a reimbursement of CONSOL's preformation expenditures with respect to the Oil and Gas Assets within the meaning of Treasury Regulations Section 1.707-4(d) to the extent applicable and (ii) in a transaction subject to treatment under Section 707(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and its implementing Treasury Regulations as in part a sale, and in part a contribution, of the Oil and Gas Assets to the Tax Partnership to the extent that Treasury Regulations Section 1.707-4(d) is inapplicable, and (e) from and after its commencement, the Tax Partnership will be treated as realizing all items of income or gain and incurring all items of cost or expense attributable to the ownership, operation or disposition of the Subject Assets, notwithstanding that such items are realized, paid or incurred by the Parties individually. The governing terms and conditions of the Tax Partnership are set forth in Exhibit G hereto.

6.2 Tax Information . Each Party Operator shall provide the TRP (as defined in the Tax Partnership Agreement) or each Party, as applicable, in a timely manner and at each Party's sole expense, with information with respect to Development Operations and Area-Wide Operations conducted by such Party Operator as the TRP or such Party may reasonably request for preparation of its tax returns, responding to any audit or tax proceeding with respect to Asset Taxes or complying with the reporting obligations in the Tax Partnership Agreement.

6.3 Responsibility for Taxes . Each Party shall be responsible for reporting and discharging its own tax measured by the income of the Party and the satisfaction of such Party's share of all contract obligations under this Agreement, the Associated Agreements and the Tax Partnership Agreement. Each Party shall protect, defend, and indemnify each other Party from and against any and all losses, costs, and liabilities arising from the indemnifying Party's failure or refusal to report and discharge such taxes or satisfy such obligations.


31



ARTICLE VII
CERTAIN PAYMENT OBLIGATIONS

7.1 Payment of Development Costs and Carried Costs .

(a) Subject to the other terms of this Agreement including Section 7.1(b) and subject to the applicable Annual Plan and Budget, (i) Noble shall pay its Share of Development Costs and (ii) CONSOL shall pay its Share of Development Costs.

(b) In addition to paying for its Share of Development Costs, unless the following obligation is temporarily suspended pursuant to Section 7.1(d) , during the Carry Period (notwithstanding the terms of any Applicable Operating Agreement to the contrary) Noble shall pay, on behalf of CONSOL and its Affiliates, one-third of all Drilling and Completion Costs that CONSOL would otherwise be required to pay as its Share of Development Costs under Section 7.1(a) (all such Drilling and Completion Costs that Noble is obligated to pay pursuant to this Section 7.1(b) and subject to Section 3.5 , the “ Carried Costs ”). For clarity, the Parties intend that Noble shall pay its Share of Development Costs plus all Carried Costs until the Carry Termination Event, and that CONSOL shall pay its Share of Development Costs less all Carried Costs until the Carry Termination Event.

(c) Until the Carry Termination Event, all Carried Costs shall be paid by Noble in the same manner and at the same time it pays or advances its Share of Development Costs pursuant to Section 7.2 .

(d) Unless otherwise agreed by Noble in writing and except as provided in Section 3.5(b)(iii), Noble's obligation to pay, on behalf of CONSOL and its Affiliates, the Carried Costs shall be temporarily suspended (i) during any period beginning on the first date in any calendar year that the Carried Costs paid by Noble for Drilling and Completion Costs incurred in such calendar year exceeds $400,000,000 and ending on the last day of such calendar year and (ii) during any period (A) beginning on the first day of the month following the month in which the average midpoint price per MMBtu of natural gas (as reported by Platts Gas Daily for natural gas delivered at Henry Hub for each such day) for a calendar month and the preceding two calendar months before such month is less than $4.00/MMBtu and (B) ending on the first day of the month following the month in which the average midpoint price per MMBtu of natural gas (as reported by Platts Gas Daily for natural gas delivered at Henry Hub for each such day) for a calendar month and the preceding two calendar months before such month equals or exceeds $4.00/MMBtu.

(e) Under no circumstance shall Noble be permitted to offset any amounts owed by CONSOL to Noble against Noble's obligation to pay the Carried Costs or the Post Closing Cash Payments.

7.2 Payment Procedures .
  
(a) Each Party Operator, at its option, may issue statements and invoices to any Party for such Party's Share of Development Costs (after giving effect to Section 7.1(b) ) and, in the case of Noble, the Carried Costs that such Party Operator incurs in connection with Development Operations or may issue a request to any Party to advance such Party's Share of Development Costs and, in the case of Noble, the Carried Costs that such Party Operator reasonably anticipates to be incurred in the future in connection with Development Operations; provided that no Party shall be obligated to advance any monies hereunder to such Party Operator for costs more than 30 days before such Development Costs are reasonably anticipated to be incurred by such Party Operator.

(b) Subject to the proviso in Section 7.2(a) , in response to each statement or invoice for

32



Development Costs issued by a Party Operator pursuant to Section 7.2(a) , each Party shall pay or advance its Share of Development Costs and, in the case of Noble, the Carried Costs within 15 days of receiving such statement or invoice.

(c) In response to each statement or invoice for Development Costs issued by a Third Party Operator under an Applicable Operating Agreement (to the extent a Party Operator has not previously issued a statement or invoice for such Development Costs), subject to the applicable Annual Plan and Budget, each Party shall pay its Share of Development Costs (after giving effect to Section 7.1(b) ). In the event that a Party Operator has issued a statement or invoice for Development Costs and a Third Party Operator under an Applicable Operating Agreement issues a statement or invoice for the same Development Costs, (i) subject to the applicable Annual Plan and Budget (as modified by Section 3.3(i) ), each Party shall pay or advance its Share of Development Costs (after giving effect to Section 7.1(b) ) by the earlier of (x) the date such amounts are required to be paid or advanced pursuant to such Party Operator's statement or invoice and (y) one Business Day prior to the date such amounts are required to be paid or advanced pursuant to such Third Party Operator's statement or invoice and (ii) upon receipt of such payment or advance, such Party Operator shall pay, on behalf of each Party, such operator for such Development Costs.

(d) Each Party shall have the right to audit each Party Operator's and its Affiliates' accounts with respect to Development Operations and Area-Wide Operations in which it participates on the same basis as is provided in Exhibit “C” to the Master JOA.

7.3 Carried Costs Balance Payment . At any time from and after the thirty-month anniversary of the Closing Date until the Carry Termination Event, Noble, upon five Business Days written notice to CONSOL (the “ Balance Election Notice ”), shall have the right (but not the obligation) to elect to pay the Carried Costs Balance as a lump sum payment, as applicable (such payment, the “ Carried Costs Balance Payment ”). Promptly following the delivery of the Balance Election Notice by Noble, but in any event within five Business Days following such delivery, Noble shall pay the Carried Costs Balance Payment by wire transfer of immediately available funds to the Carried Cost Balance Account designated and controlled (subject to the obligations of CONSOL to withdraw such funds solely for the purpose hereafter described) by CONSOL promptly following CONSOL's receipt of the Balance Election Notice. Upon CONSOL's receipt of the Carried Costs Balance Payment, Noble's and its Affiliates' obligation to pay Carried Costs shall be deemed to be fully satisfied, the Carry Termination Event shall be deemed to have occurred and Noble shall have no right to the return of the Carried Cost Balance. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, any funds held in the Carried Costs Balance Account (exclusive of interest, which notwithstanding the fact that the payment of the requisite funds into the Carried Costs Balance Account, shall be allocated and distributed 100% to Noble) shall, prior to the termination of the Tax Partnership pursuant to Section 7.1 of the Tax Partnership Agreement, be used solely to pay Drilling and Completion Costs of CONSOL incurred pursuant to Development Operations and Area-Wide Operations in the same amount and manner as the funds provided by Noble to pay Carried Costs in accordance with Section 7.1(b) would have been used pursuant to this Agreement had the Carried Costs Balance Payment not been made and the Carry Termination Event not occurred.

7.4 Post Closing Cash Payments . Noble shall pay to CONSOL the Post Closing Cash Payments as and when required under the Acquisition Agreement.

7.5 Certain Order of Payments . Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, each Party hereby agrees that with respect to any outstanding payment obligation of Noble, all monies received by CONSOL and all recoveries realized in connection with any of the remedies hereunder for a default by Noble shall first be applied towards any portion of the Post Closing Cash Payments that are then due and

33



payable by Noble to CONSOL, second, be applied towards any Carried Costs that are then due and payable by Noble, and third, be applied pro rata amongst the Parties towards any other payment obligations of Noble.

7.6 Total Cost Sharing Payments . Noble shall pay the Total Cost Sharing Payments into the Cost Reconciliation Account designated and controlled (subject to the obligations of CONSOL to withdraw such funds solely for the purposes specified in this Section 7.6) by CONSOL as and when required under the Acquisition Agreement. The funds (other than interest accruing thereon) held from time to time in the Cost Reconciliation Account shall not be withdrawn or applied for the benefit of either Party for 30 days after the date on which such funds are deposited into the Cost Reconciliation Account (with respect to such funds, the “Lockup Termination Date”), provided that CONSOL shall be entitled to borrow any portion of the principal balance of the Cost Reconciliation Account prior to the relevant Lockup Termination Date applicable to the funds at an arm's-length interest rate and on other commercially reasonable terms for similar loans. The Parties acknowledge that the funds in the Cost Reconciliation Account discharge Noble's obligation to make Total Cost Sharing Payments dollar for dollar. Notwithstanding the fact that Noble has no right to the return of the Total Cost Sharing Payments paid into the Cost Reconciliation Account, any interest earned on the Cost Reconciliation Account (or loans made therefrom) shall be allocated and distributed to the Parties based on their respective Participating Interests periodically. Following the relevant Lockup Termination Date, the principal balance of the Cost Reconciliation Account shall be withdrawn by, and transferred to, CONSOL as reimbursement of costs funded by CONSOL in respect of the Oil and Gas Assets prior to the Closing Date (and not theretofore reimbursed from the Total Cost Sharing Payments).

ARTICLE VIII
DEFAULTS

8.1 Defaults .  

(a) In the event that any Party fails to pay any of its Share of Development Costs (other than with respect to operational expenses, excluding Carried Costs, that are being disputed by a Party in good faith in an aggregate amount not to exceed $1,000,000) or Noble fails to pay any Carried Costs, in each case, on or before the Initial Default Date, or Noble fails to make any payment in respect of the Post Closing Cash Payments as and when required by Section 7.4 and under the Acquisition Agreement (such Party, a “ Defaulting Party ” and each such failure, a “ Payment Default ”), then (i) the other Parties (the “ Non-Defaulting Parties ”) shall provide written notice of such Payment Default (a “ Default Notice ”) to such Defaulting Party within 10 days after the Initial Default Date (provided any failure by the Non-Defaulting Parties to give such notice within such time period shall not affect any rights or remedies of the Non-Defaulting Parties in this Agreement, the Acquisition Agreement or any Associated Agreement, but shall be a covenant for the benefit of the Defaulting Party solely for the purpose of allowing the Defaulting Party to assert a claim in the event the Defaulting Party incurs damages caused by the Non-Defaulting Party's failure to give any such notice within such period) and (ii) in addition to (A) the remedies available to any Non-Defaulting Party under any Associated Agreements, (B) those remedies that occur automatically pursuant to Section 8.2 , (C) in the case Noble is the Defaulting Party with respect to its payment obligations for the Post Closing Cash Payments, the remedies available to CONSOL under the Acquisition Agreement, and (D) any and all other rights and remedies under this Agreement or at Law or in equity, the applicable Non-Defaulting Parties shall be entitled to exercise, in their sole discretion, any one or more of the remedies set forth in Section 8.3 during the period of time beginning on the Initial Default Date until the date upon which the Total Amount in Default has been fully cured (the “ Default Period ”).

(b) All amounts in default and not paid when due under this Agreement shall bear interest at the Agreed Rate from the due date to the date of payment.

34




8.2 Certain Automatic Remedies for a Default .  

(a) General Remedies . Unless a majority of the Non-Defaulting Parties (based on their relative Participating Interests) elect in writing to waive or extend the time period for any or all of the following, then, for a period (1) beginning on the earlier of (x) the 10 th day after the date on which the Defaulting Party receives the Default Notice and (y) 20 days after the Initial Default Date and (2) ending upon the expiration of the Default Period, the Defaulting Party shall automatically not be entitled to:

(i) make or elect to participate in any proposal under this Agreement or any Applicable Operating Agreement;

(ii) vote on any matter with respect to which approval is required under the express terms of this Agreement or any Associated Agreement (excluding any amendment or waiver of the terms of any such agreement and any amendment or modification to the Development Plan);

(iii) call any Joint Development Committee meeting;

(iv) send its representatives or advisors to any meeting of the Joint Development Committee (and such members shall not be eligible to vote on any matters brought before the Joint Development Committee);

(v) access any data or information relating to any operation conducted under this Agreement or any Associated Agreement (except to the extent that the Defaulting Party is a Party Operator, in which case such Defaulting Party shall be entitled to such data and information as may be necessary to perform its responsibilities in such capacity);

(vi) Transfer all or any part of its Joint Development Interest or any other Subject Asset, undergo a Change in Control or encumber all or any part of its Joint Development Interest or any other Subject Assets, except in a case of a Transfer of a Joint Development Interest to, or a Change in Control with, a Person or encumbrance in favor of a Person who simultaneously with such Transfer, Change in Control or encumbrance satisfies in full the Total Amount in Default;

(vii) elect to acquire any Offered Interest pursuant to Section 4.4 ; or

(viii) elect to acquire any Option Interests pursuant to Section 5.3 .

(b) Certain Remedies . If Noble is a Defaulting Party with respect to the Total Amount (a “ NBL Payment Default ”), then unless CONSOL elects in writing to waive or extend the time period for the following, as of the earlier to occur of (x) the 110 th  day after the date on which Noble, as the Defaulting Party, receives the Default Notice for such NBL Payment Default and (y) 120 days after the Initial Default Date for such NBL Payment Default (the “ NBL Acceleration Trigger ”), Noble shall be required to pay the NBL Balance as a lump sum payment, as applicable (such payment, the “ NBL Balance Payment ”). Promptly following the NBL Acceleration Trigger, but in any event within five Business Days following the date of such NBL Acceleration Trigger, Noble shall pay to CONSOL the NBL Balance Payment by wire transfer of immediately available funds as follows: (i) the amount of the Carried Costs Balance shall be paid to the Carried Costs Balance Account specified by CONSOL in writing to Noble promptly following the NBL Acceleration Trigger and (ii) the amount of the Post Closing Cash Payments Balance shall be paid to a Tax Partnership Account specified by CONSOL in writing to Noble promptly following the NBL Acceleration

35



Trigger. Upon CONSOL's receipt of the NBL Balance Payment, (a) Noble and its Affiliates shall be deemed to no longer be in default of the obligation to pay the Total Amount in accordance with this Agreement and the Acquisition Agreement, (b) such obligation to pay Total Amount shall be deemed to be fully satisfied, and (c) the Carry Termination Event shall be deemed to have occurred. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, any funds held in the Carried Costs Balance Account (exclusive of interest, which shall be allocated and distributed 50% to CONSOL and 50% to Noble) shall, prior to the termination of the Tax Partnership pursuant to Section 7.1 of the Tax Partnership Agreement, be used solely to pay Drilling and Completion Costs incurred pursuant to Development Operations and Area-Wide Operations in the same amount and manner as the funds provided by Noble to pay Carried Costs would have been used pursuant to this Agreement had the NBL Balance Payment not been made and the Carry Termination Event not occurred.

8.3 Certain Other Remedies for a Default .
  
(a) Right to Entitlements . From and after the 30 th  day after the Initial Default Date, a Defaulting Party shall have no right to receive its Entitlement from the Subject Assets and the Non-Defaulting Parties shall have the right to collect such Entitlement; provided that, in the case that (i) Noble is the Defaulting Party, the proceeds from all such Entitlements shall be used to pay the Total Amount in Default and shall be deemed, first, to apply to the portion of the Total Amount in Default that relates to any portion of the Post Closing Cash Payments that are then due and payable by Noble to CONSOL, second, and only to the extent that all Payment Defaults have been cured with respect to the Post Closing Cash Payments, to apply to the portion of the Total Amount in Default that relates to any Carried Costs and, third, and only to the extent that all Payment Defaults have been cured with respect to the Post Closing Cash Payments and the Carried Costs, proportionately to the remainder of the Total Amount in Default and (ii) CONSOL is the Defaulting Party, the proceeds from all such Entitlements shall be used to pay the Total Amount in Default and shall be deemed to apply proportionately to the Total Amount in Default.

(b) Specific Performance . Any Non-Defaulting Party shall be entitled to seek specific performance of any of the Defaulting Party's obligations under this Agreement or any Associated Agreement.

(c) Removal of Party Operator .

(i) In addition to the other remedies available hereunder to CONSOL, if Noble Operator or any of its Affiliates is a Defaulting Party, from and after the 30 th  day after the Initial Default Date, then, and so long as Noble Operator or any of its Affiliates is in a Payment Default, CONSOL may deliver to Noble Operator a notice that it is electing to remove Noble Operator as operator of the NBL Operated Area, effective as of the date of such notice (or such later date as CONSOL shall specify in such notice), and Noble Operator shall be replaced in accordance with Section 2.5(b)(ii) .

(ii) In addition to the other remedies available hereunder to Noble, if CONSOL Operator or any of its Affiliates is a Defaulting Party, from and after the 30 th  day after the Initial Default Date, then, and so long as CONSOL Operator or any of its Affiliates is in a Payment Default, Noble may deliver to CONSOL Operator a notice that it is electing to remove CONSOL Operator as operator of the CNX Operated Area, effective as of the date of such notice (or such later date as Noble shall specify in such notice), and CONSOL Operator shall be replaced in accordance with Section 2.5(a)(ii) .

(d) Offset . Except as provided in Section 7.1(e) , any Non-Defaulting Party and its Affiliates shall be permitted to offset any amounts owed to it by a Defaulting Party or its Affiliates.

8.4 Cumulative and Additional Remedies . The rights and remedies granted to Non-Defaulting

36



Parties in this ARTICLE VIII shall be cumulative, not exclusive, and shall be in addition to any other rights and remedies that may be available to the Non-Defaulting Parties, at Law, in equity or otherwise. Each right and remedy available to a Non-Defaulting Party may be exercised from time to time and so often and in such order as may be considered expedient by a Non-Defaulting Party in its sole discretion.

ARTICLE IX
LAND AND GEOSCIENCE DATA; DISCLAIMERS

9.1 Land and Geoscience Data . To the extent that a Party is neither prohibited nor required to make payment of a fee pursuant to any Third Party agreement or applicable Law, each Party will make available to any other Party, upon request, (a) all existing leasehold documentation developed or obtained by such Party in connection with the acquisition of Subject Assets within the Development Area, including all lease, land, title and division order files (including any available abstracts of title, title opinions and reports, and title curative documents), contracts, accounting records, correspondence, permitting, engineering, production, and well files (including any well logs) and (b) all seismic and geological data and other similar information, including drainage data, seismic surveys, information regarding fracing of wells and related information regarding the development and operation of the Subject Assets, in each case, that such Party may possess. The Party holding such data and information, as the case may be, will use its commercially reasonable efforts to obtain the consent of the applicable party to disclose any such data to such other Parties (to the extent applicable to such Parties' interest in the Subject Assets at such time) if such disclosure is otherwise prohibited without such consent. Other than with respect to amounts required to be paid to obtain any necessary consent to share any information that was held by CONSOL Operator prior to the Closing Date and amounts being paid by Noble to CONSOL pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement, the costs of acquiring, transferring or sharing any such data and information (including any fee amounts required to be paid to obtain any necessary consents) for any Subject Assets will be Development Costs to be borne and paid by the Parties in relation to their Participating Interests. With respect to amounts required to be paid to obtain any necessary consent to share any information that was held by CONSOL Operator prior to the Closing Date, such amount shall be paid by the Party requesting the sharing of such information.

9.2 Disclaimers . EACH PARTY MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, STATUTORY OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS OF MATERIALS, DOCUMENTS AND OTHER INFORMATION MADE AVAILABLE BY SUCH PARTY IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT AND SUCH PARTY EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL LIABILITY AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY REPRESENTATION, WARRANTY, STATEMENT OR INFORMATION MADE OR COMMUNICATED (ORALLY OR IN WRITING) TO EACH OTHER PARTY OR ANY OF ITS AFFILIATES, EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, CONSULTANTS OR REPRESENTATIVES (INCLUDING ANY OPINION, INFORMATION, PROJECTION OR ADVICE THAT MAY HAVE BEEN PROVIDED TO SUCH OTHER PARTIES, INCLUDING PURSUANT TO SECTION 9.1 ). EACH PARTY EXPRESSLY AGREES THAT ANY RELIANCE UPON OR CONCLUSIONS DRAWN FROM ANY MATERIALS, DOCUMENTS AND OTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED BY ANOTHER PARTY SHALL BE AT ITS OWN RISK TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW AND SHALL NOT GIVE RISE TO ANY LIABILITY OF OR AGAINST THE PROVIDING PARTY. EACH PARTY HEREBY WAIVES AND RELEASES ANY CLAIMS ARISING UNDER THIS AGREEMENT, COMMON LAW OR ANY STATUTE ARISING OUT OF ANY MATERIALS, DOCUMENTS OR INFORMATION PROVIDED BY ANOTHER PARTY TO SUCH PARTY. EACH PARTY agreeS that, to the extent required by applicable Law to be effective, the disclaimers of certain representations and warranties contained in this Section 9.2 are “conspicuous” disclaimers for the purpose of any applicable Law.

37




ARTICLE X
TERM

10.1 Termination . This Agreement shall terminate upon the earlier to occur of (“ Termination Date ”):

(a) the date that is 60 days after the occurrence of the Carry Termination Event; or

(b) the mutual agreement of CONSOL and Noble.

10.2 Effect of Termination . Upon the Termination Date, (a) this Agreement shall forthwith become void and the Parties shall have no liability or obligation hereunder and (b) to the extent not previously completed, (i) CONSOL Operator and Noble Operator shall each, as promptly as practicable, designate Drilling Units for any portion of the Subject Assets that are not already included in a Drilling Unit or covered by a Third Party Operating Agreement, (ii) execute and deliver separate Unit JOAs to cover any such Drilling Unit and (iii) execute and file separate Unit JOA Memoranda and related financing statements for each such Unit JOA and file such Unit JOA Memoranda in the real property records of each county in which the Subject Assets that are covered by the applicable Unit JOA are located and such financing statements in the proper office under the Uniform Commercial Code in the states in which such Subject Assets are located. Upon completion of the requirements set forth in the preceding sentence, the Master JOA shall automatically be deemed to have terminated and the Parties shall take all action as is necessary to reflect such termination, including filing a release of each Master JOA Memoranda that is on file in the real property records and a termination of all related financing statements. Notwithstanding the foregoing, (1) the termination of this Agreement or any provision thereof shall not relieve any Party from any expense, liability or other obligation or remedy therefor which has accrued or attached prior to the date of such termination, (2) as among the Parties (but not as to any successor or assign of such Party following the termination of this Agreement), the provisions of Section 6.1 and Exhibit G shall survive such termination and remain in full force and effect until the Tax Partnership is terminated in accordance with the terms of the Tax Partnership Agreement, (3) the provisions of Section 2.6 and ARTICLE XI (other than Section 11.8 ) shall survive such termination and remain in full force and effect indefinitely, (4) the provisions of Section 2.13 shall survive such termination and remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms, and (5) the provisions of ARTICLE V and this clause (5) shall survive the termination of this Agreement until the 25th anniversary of the Closing Date; provided that with respect to this clause (5) , from and after the termination of this Agreement, (x)  Section 5.2 shall terminate and any Fill-In Interests acquired by any Party shall be deemed to be an Option Interest subject to Section 5.3 , (y) either Party can terminate the provisions of ARTICLE V with respect to all or any portion of the Development Area prior to the 25th anniversary of the Closing Date by giving 6 months prior written notice of the same to the other Parties and (z) upon the sale of any Lease and/or well by any Party to a Third Party, the provisions of ARTICLE V with respect to such Lease and/or well and all related assets with respect thereto shall terminate.

ARTICLE XI
MISCELLANEOUS

11.1 Relationship of the Parties . The rights, duties, obligations and liabilities of the Parties under this Agreement shall be individual, not joint or collective. It is not the intention of the Parties to create, nor shall this Agreement be deemed or construed to create, a mining or other partnership (other than the Tax Partnership created pursuant to Section 6.1 for federal and state income tax purposes only), joint venture or association or a trust. This Agreement shall not be deemed or construed to authorize any Party to act as an

38



agent, servant or employee for any other Party for any purpose whatsoever except as explicitly set forth in this Agreement. In their relations with each other under this Agreement, the Parties shall not be considered fiduciaries.

11.2 Notices .
  
(a) Generally . Subject to Section 11.2(b) , all notices and communications required or permitted to be given hereunder, shall be sufficient in all respects if given in writing and delivered personally, or sent by bonded overnight courier, or mailed by U.S. Express Mail or by certified or registered United States Mail with all postage fully prepaid, or sent by facsimile transmission (provided any such facsimile transmission is confirmed either orally or by written confirmation) or (only with respect to purposes set forth in Section 11.2(b) ) by electronic mail with a PDF of the notice or other communication attached (provided that any such electronic mail is confirmed either by written confirmation, facsimile transmission or U.S. Express Mail), in each case, addressed to the appropriate Person at the address for such Person shown below:

If to CONSOL, its representatives on the Joint Development Committee or CONSOL Operator:
CNX Gas Company LLC
2481 John Nash Blvd
Bluefield, WV 24701
Attention: Randall M. Albert
Telephone: 304-323-6501
Fax: 304-323-6615
Email: RandyAlbert@cnxgas.com

CNX Gas Company LLC
CNX Center
1000 CONSOL Energy Drive
Canonsburg, PA 15317
Attention: Charles Hardoby
Telephone: (724) 485-4166
Fax: (724) 485-4836
Email: ChuckHardoby@consolenergy.com
CNX Gas Company LLC
CNX Center
1000 CONSOL Energy Drive
Canonsburg, PA 15317
Attention: Stephen W. Johnson
Telephone: (724) 485-4163
Fax: (724) 485-4836
Email: SteveJohnson@consolenergy.com

39



If to CONSOL's Party Representative:
CNX Gas Company LLC
2481 John Nash Blvd
Bluefield, WV 24701
Attention: Michael Onifer
Telephone: (304) 323-6502
Fax: (304) 323-6549
Email: MikeOnifer@cnxgas.com
In each case, with a copy to:
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
51 West 52 nd Street
New York, NY 10019-6150
Attention: David A. Katz
Telephone: (212) 403-1309
Email: dakatz@wlrk.com


If to Noble or its representatives on the Joint Development Committee or Noble Operator:
Noble Energy, Inc.
100 Glenborough Drive, Suite 100
Houston, Texas 77067
Attention: Barry Shelden
Telephone:      281-872-3100
Fax:          281-872-3111
Email: bshelden@nobleenergyinc.com
Noble Energy, Inc.
100 Glenborough Drive, Suite 100
Houston, Texas 77067
Attention: John Lewis
Telephone:      281-872-3100
Fax:          281-872-3111
Email: jlewis@nobleenergyinc.com
Noble Energy, Inc.
100 Glenborough Drive, Suite 100
Houston, Texas 77067
Attention: Aaron Carlson
Telephone:      281-872-3100
Fax:          281-872-3111
Email:

40



If to Noble's Party Representative:
Noble Energy, Inc.
100 Glenborough Drive, Suite 100
Houston, Texas 77067
Attention: Barry Shelden
Telephone:      281-872-3100
Fax:          281-872-3111
Email: bshelden@nobleenergyinc.com
Any notice given in accordance herewith shall be deemed to have been given when (i) delivered to the addressee in person or by courier, (ii) transmitted by facsimile transmission or electronic communications during normal business hours, or if transmitted after normal business hours, on the next Business Day, or (iii) upon actual receipt by the addressee after such notice has either been delivered to an overnight courier or deposited in the United States Mail if received during normal business hours, or if not received during normal business hours, then on the next Business Day, as the case may be.
(b) Notices . With respect to any notices and communications required or permitted to be given pursuant to ARTICLE II , ARTICLE III , ARTICLE VII , or ARTICLE IX , such notices and communications shall be sufficient in all respects if given in accordance with Section 11.2(a) or if such notice is delivered by email to the address specified for a Person in Section 11.2(a) ; provided that, in each case, copies of such notices and communications shall not be required to be given to any law firm representing such Party. Any notice given by email shall be deemed to have been given on the Business Day such email was sent, if sent during normal business hours, and on the Business Day following such email being sent, if sent at a time other than normal business hours.

(c) Any Person may change their contact information for notice by giving written notice to the other Parties in the manner provided in Section 11.2(a) .

11.3 Expenses . Except as otherwise specifically provided, all fees, costs and expenses incurred by the Parties in negotiating this Agreement shall be paid by the Party incurring the same, including legal and accounting fees, costs and expenses.

11.4 Waivers; Rights Cumulative . Any of the terms, covenants, or conditions hereof may be waived only by a written instrument executed by or on behalf of the Party waiving compliance. No course of dealing on the part of any Party, or their respective officers, employees, agents, or representatives, nor any failure by a Party to exercise any of its rights under this Agreement shall operate as a waiver thereof or affect in any way the right of such Party at a later time to enforce the performance of such provision. No waiver by any Party of any condition, or any breach of any term or covenant contained in this Agreement, in any one or more instances, shall be deemed to be or construed as a further or continuing waiver of any such condition or breach or a waiver of any other condition or of any breach of any other term or covenant. The rights of the Parties under this Agreement shall be cumulative, and the exercise or partial exercise of any such right shall not preclude the exercise of any other right.

11.5 Entire Agreement; Conflicts . THIS AGREEMENT, THE EXHIBITS HERETO, THE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT (INCLUDING ALL TRANSACTION DOCUMENTS) AND THE ASSOCIATED AGREEMENTS COLLECTIVELY CONSTITUTE THE ENTIRE AGREEMENT AMONG THE PARTIES PERTAINING TO THE SUBJECT MATTER HEREOF AND SUPERSEDE ALL PRIOR AGREEMENTS, UNDERSTANDINGS, NEGOTIATIONS, AND DISCUSSIONS, WHETHER

41



ORAL OR WRITTEN, OF THE PARTIES PERTAINING TO THE SUBJECT MATTER HEREOF. THERE ARE NO WARRANTIES, REPRESENTATIONS, OR OTHER AGREEMENTS AMONG THE PARTIES RELATING TO THE SUBJECT MATTER HEREOF EXCEPT AS SPECIFICALLY SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT, THE EXHIBITS HERETO, THE ACQUISITION AGREEMENT (INCLUDING ALL TRANSACTION DOCUMENTS) AND THE ASSOCIATED AGREEMENTS, AND NO PARTY SHALL BE BOUND BY OR LIABLE FOR ANY ALLEGED REPRESENTATION, PROMISE, INDUCEMENT, OR STATEMENTS OF INTENTION NOT SO SET FORTH. IN THE EVENT OF A CONFLICT BETWEEN: (A) THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF ANY EXHIBIT HERETO (OTHER THAN THE TAX PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT); OR (B) THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF ANY ASSOCIATED AGREEMENT (INCLUDING ANY THIRD PARTY JOINT OPERATING AGREEMENT, BUT EXCLUDING THE TAX PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT), THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT SHALL GOVERN AND CONTROL , PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT THE INCLUSION IN ANY OF THE EXHIBITS HERETO OR ANY ASSOCIATED AGREEMENT OF TERMS AND PROVISIONS NOT ADDRESSED IN THIS AGREEMENT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED A CONFLICT, AND ALL SUCH ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS SHALL BE GIVEN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT, SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION 11.5 .

11.6 Amendment . This Agreement may be amended only by an instrument in writing executed by CONSOL and Noble and expressly identified as an amendment or modification.

11.7 Governing Law; Disputes .  

(a) GENERALLY . THIS AGREEMENT AND THE LEGAL RELATIONS AMONG THE PARTIES SHALL BE GOVERNED AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, EXCLUDING ANY CONFLICTS OF LAW RULE OR PRINCIPLE THAT MIGHT REFER CONSTRUCTION OF SUCH PROVISIONS TO THE LAWS OF ANOTHER JURISDICTION. ALL OF THE PARTIES HERETO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION IN PERSONAM BY THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL DISTRICT COURTS LOCATED IN THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA FOR ANY ACTION ARISING OUT OF THIS AGREEMENT, THE ASSOCIATED AGREEMENTS OR ANY TRANSACTION CONTEMPLATED HEREBY OR THEREBY. ALL ACTIONS OR PROCEEDINGS WITH RESPECT TO, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY IN CONNECTION WITH, OUT OF, RELATED TO, OR FROM THIS AGREEMENT, THE ASSOCIATED AGREEMENTS OR ANY TRANSACTION CONTEMPLATED HEREBY OR THEREBY SHALL BE EXCLUSIVELY LITIGATED IN THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL DISTRICT COURTS HAVING SITES IN PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA (AND ALL APPELLATE COURTS HAVING JURISDICTION THEREOVER). EACH PARTY HERETO WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, ANY RIGHT IT MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN RESPECT OF ANY ACTION, SUIT OR PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT, THE ASSOCIATED AGREEMENTS OR ANY TRANSACTION CONTEMPLATED HEREBY OR THEREBY.

(b) Expert Proceedings . For any decision referred to an expert under this Agreement as expressly provided herein, the Parties hereby agree that such decision shall be conducted expeditiously by an expert (who shall have at least 10 years of oil and gas exploration and development experience in the Development Area and with respect to the subject matter giving rise to the underlying dispute) selected unanimously by the Parties to such dispute. The expert is not an arbitrator of the dispute and shall not be deemed to be acting in an arbitral capacity. The Party desiring an expert determination shall give the other Party written notice of the request for such determination. If the Parties are unable to agree upon an expert within 10 days after receipt of the notice of request for an expert determination, then, upon the request of any of the Parties, the

42



Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania office of the American Arbitration Association shall appoint such expert. The expert, once appointed, shall have no ex parte communications with the Parties concerning the expert determination or the underlying dispute. All communications between any Party and the expert shall be conducted in writing, with copies sent simultaneously to the other Party in the same manner, or at a meeting to which all Parties have been invited and of which such Parties have been provided at least 5 Business Days notice. Within 30 days after the expert's acceptance of its appointment, the Parties shall provide the expert with a report containing their proposal for the resolution of the matter and the reasons therefor, accompanied by all relevant supporting information and data. Within 60 days of receipt of the above-described materials and after receipt of additional information or data as may be required by the expert, the expert shall select the proposal which it finds more consistent with the terms of this Agreement. The expert may not propose alternate positions or award damages, interest or penalties to any Party with respect to any matter. The expert's decision shall be final and binding on the Parties. Any Party that fails or refuses to honor the decision of an expert shall be in default under this Agreement.

(c) Damages . None of the Parties shall be entitled to recover from any other Party, or such Parties respective Affiliates, any indirect, consequential, punitive or exemplary damages or damages for lost profits of any kind arising under or in connection with this Agreement, the Associated Agreements or the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby, except to the extent any such Party suffers such damages (including costs of defense and reasonable attorney's fees incurred in connection with defending of such damages) to a Third Party, which damages (including costs of defense and reasonable attorney's fees incurred in connection with defending against such damages) shall not be excluded by this provision as to recovery hereunder. Subject to the preceding sentence, each Party, on behalf of itself and each of its Affiliates, waive any right to recover punitive, special, exemplary and consequential damages, including damages for lost profits, arising in connection with or with respect to this Agreement, the Associated Agreements or the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby.

11.8 Publicity .
(a) No Party will issue any Press Release with respect to this Agreement, the Associated Agreements or the activities contemplated hereby or thereby without providing the text of such Press Release to the other Party at least 24 hours prior to release, except where such releasing Party in good faith determines that such Press Release is required to be released immediately by Law or under the rules and regulations of a recognized stock exchange on which shares of such Party or any of its Affiliates are listed in which case the releasing Party shall promptly thereafter provide each Party with a copy of such Press Release.

(b) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Section 11.8(a) , in the event of any emergency endangering property, lives or the environment, Party Operator may issue such Press Releases or other public announcements as it deems necessary in light of the circumstances and shall promptly thereafter provide each Party with a copy of any such Press Release or other public statement.

11.9 Parties in Interest . Nothing in this Agreement shall entitle any Person other than the Parties to any claim, cause of action, remedy or right of any kind.

11.10 Successors and Permitted Assigns . This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties and their successors and permitted transferees and assigns.

11.11 Preparation of Agreement . Both CONSOL and Noble and their respective counsel participated in the preparation of this Agreement. In the event of any ambiguity in this Agreement, no presumption shall arise based on the identity of the draftsman of this Agreement.


43



11.12 Severability . If any term or other provision of this Agreement is invalid, illegal, or incapable of being enforced by any rule of Law or public policy, all other conditions and provisions of this Agreement shall nevertheless remain in full force and effect so long as the economic or legal substance of the transactions contemplated hereby is not affected in any adverse manner to any Party. Upon such determination that any term or other provision is invalid, illegal, or incapable of being enforced, the Parties shall negotiate in good faith to modify this Agreement so as to effect the original intent of the Parties as closely as possible in an acceptable manner to the end that the transactions contemplated hereby are fulfilled to the extent possible.

11.13 Counterparts . This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, and each such counterpart hereof shall be deemed to be an original instrument, but all of such counterparts shall constitute for all purposes one agreement. Any signature hereto delivered by a Party by facsimile transmission shall be deemed an original signature hereto.

11.14 Excluded Assets . For the avoidance of doubt and notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, no Excluded Asset shall be subject to the terms of this Agreement or any Associated Agreement.


[ Remainder of page intentionally left blank. Signature page follows. ]
















44



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement by their duly authorized representatives on and as of the Closing Date.
CNX GAS COMPANY LLC


By:      /s/ Stephen W. Johnson     
Name: Stephen W. Johnson
Title:      Vice President     



NOBLE ENERGY, INC.

By:      /s/ Shawn E. Conner     
Name: Shawn E. Conner     
Title:      Vice President     




















[SIGNATURE PAGE TO JOINT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT]

45



APPENDIX I
DEFINITIONS
Acquiring Party ” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.3(a) .
Acquisition Agreement ” means that certain Asset Acquisition Agreement by and between CONSOL and Noble, dated August 17, 2011, as amended in writing from time to time.
Acquisition Costs ” means the actual acquisition costs and Third Party expenses, including lease bonuses, broker fees, abstract costs, title opinion costs and all other Third Party costs of due diligence, including reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred by the applicable Party in acquiring any Fill-In Interests or Option Interests along with any adjustments required by Section 5.4(b)(ii) ; provided, however, that (a) if Fill-In Interests or Option Interests were acquired by the Party Operator or an Acquiring Party, as applicable, as part of a Package Sale or as part of an acquisition of an entity with assets and properties that are not within the Development Area, then the amount of the Acquisition Costs for such Fill-In Interests or Option Interests shall be deemed to be the lesser of (1) the value allocated to such Fill-In Interests or Option Interests in the transaction in which the Party Operator or Acquiring Party, as applicable, acquired such interests or (2) the Fair Market Value of the Fill-In Interests or Option Interests and (b) if the consideration paid by such Party Operator or such Acquiring Party, as applicable, includes any non-cash consideration, then the value of such non-cash consideration shall be deemed to be the lesser of (x) the value allocated to such non-cash consideration in the transaction in which the Party Operator or Acquiring Party, as applicable, acquired such interests or (y) the Fair Market Value of such non-cash consideration.
Acquisition Notice ” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.3(a) .
Active Rig ” means a drilling rig capable of drilling a horizontal well to a depth within the Marcellus Formation with a minimum lateral of 4,500 feet.
Additional Interests ” has the meaning set forth in the Acquisition Agreement.
AFE ” means authority for expenditure.
Affiliate ” means, with respect to any Person, any other Person that directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with, such Person.
Affiliate Contract ” means any contract or other agreement entered into by a Party Operator, on the one hand, and any of its Affiliates, on the other, in connection with any Development Operations or any Area-Wide Operations that would reasonably be expected to involve aggregate payments by such Party Operator that, taken in the aggregate with all payments under all other contracts or agreements between the Party Operator and its Affiliates for similar goods and services, would be in excess of $500,000 in any 12-month period; provided that the Surface Use Agreement and the Water Use Agreement (each as defined in the Acquisition Agreement) shall not be deemed to be Affiliate Contracts.






46



Agreed Rate ” means the Prime Rate (as published in the “Money Rates” table of The Wall Street Journal , eastern edition) plus an additional two percentage points applicable on the first Business Day prior to the due date of payment and thereafter on the first Business Day of each succeeding calendar month (or, if such rate is contrary to any applicable usury Law, the maximum rate permitted by such applicable Law).
Agreement ” means this Joint Development Agreement, as amended in writing from time to time.
AMI Purchase Date ” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.3(b) .
Annual Plan and Budget ” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.3(a) .
Applicable Operating Agreements ” means, collectively, the Joint Development Operating Agreements and all Third Party Operating Agreements, and “ Applicable Operating Agreement ” means any of them.
Area-Wide Operation ” means a seismic or other geophysical data acquisition operation, or other similar operation, including geophysical surveys, microseismic monitoring and core sampling and analysis conducted by the Parties in accordance with this Agreement with respect to the Development Area and covering areas subject to more than one Applicable Operating Agreement.
Asset Taxes ” means ad valorem, property, excise, severance, production or similar taxes (including any interest, fine, penalty or additions to tax imposed by Governmental Authorities in connection with such taxes) based upon operation or ownership of the Subject Assets or the production of hydrocarbons therefrom, but excluding, for the avoidance of doubt, income, capital gains and franchise taxes.
Assigned FT Interests ” has the meaning set forth in Schedule 2.10(a) .
Associated Agreements ” means, collectively, the Applicable Operating Agreements and any other agreements entered into by a Party and any third parties in furtherance of the conduct of Development Operations or Area-Wide Operations (including the Surface Use Agreement, the Noble Secondment Agreement, the CONSOL Secondment Agreement, the Services Agreement and the Water Use Agreement (each as defined in the Acquisition Agreement)), and “ Associated Agreement ” means any of them.
Balance Election Notice ” has the meaning set forth in Section 7.3 .
Business Day ” means a day (other than a Saturday or Sunday) on which commercial banks in Pennsylvania and Houston are generally open for business.
Carried Cost Obligation ” means $ 2,133,776,252, as may be adjusted pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement.
Carried Costs ” has the meaning set forth in Section 7.1(b) .
Carried Costs Balance ” means, as of any time, the difference between the Carried Costs Obligation and the aggregate amount of Carried Costs actually paid by Noble or funded into a Tax Partnership Account by Noble, in each case, in accordance with the terms hereof, Noble as of such time.
Carried Costs Balance Account ” means the Tax Partnership Account to which the Carried Costs Balance Payment is made pursuant to Section 7.3 or Section 8.2(b) .
Carried Costs Balance Payment ” has the meaning set forth in Section 7.3 .

47



Carried Costs Amount ” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.5(b)(i) .
Carry Period ” means the period beginning on the Closing Date and ending at the Carry Termination Event.
Carry Termination Event ” means the time at which (a) the aggregate amount of Carried Costs actually paid by Noble or funded into a Tax Partnership Account by Noble, in each case, in accordance with the terms hereof equals (b) the Carried Cost Obligation.
Change in Control ” means any direct or indirect change in control of a Person (whether through merger, sale of shares or other equity interests, or otherwise), through a single transaction or series of related transactions, from one or more transferors to one or more transferees; provided, however, that for purposes hereof, a “Change in Control” shall not include a change in control of a Party (a) resulting in ongoing control by an Affiliate that is wholly-owned by the ultimate parent company of such Party, (b) created by a change in control of CONSOL Energy Inc. (or its successor) or Noble Energy, Inc. (or its successor) or (c) solely with respect to Section 4.4 , created by a change in control of any entity directly or indirectly holding all of CONSOL's and its Affiliates' Joint Development Interest and all or substantially all of CONSOL's and its Affiliates' other oil and gas assets (other than coalbed methane assets) that is effected through (i) the distribution of the equity interests in such entity to the public stockholders of CONSOL Energy Inc. (or its successor) in proportion to the respective stock ownership of CONSOL Energy Inc. (or its successor), (ii) an initial public offering of equity ownership interests in such entity, in either case as a result of which such entity becomes a publicly-held company subject to the reporting requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and would qualify for initial listing and quotation on the New York Stock Exchange or any other national securities exchange in the United States, or (iii) a Transfer of the equity interests in such entity in a transaction having the purpose of separating CONSOL Energy Inc.'s (or its successor) coal business from its oil and gas exploration and development business.
Closing Cash Payment ” has the meaning set forth in the Acquisition Agreement.
Closing Date ” has the meaning set forth in the Preamble.
CNX Operated Area ” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.3(a) , subject to the provisions of Section 2.3(c) , Section 2.3(d) and Section 5.3(d) .
CONSOL ” has the meaning set forth in the Preamble.
CONSOL Master JOA Memorandum ” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.4(b) .
CONSOL Operator ” means CONSOL or any Affiliate of CONSOL designated by CONSOL or, to the extent permitted by Section 4.1(a)(ii) , any transferee that upon consummation of such Transfer will hold at least a 25% Participating Interest.
CONSOL Secondment Agreement ” has the meaning set forth in the Acquisition Agreement.
CONSOL Unit JOA Memorandum ” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.4(d) .
control ” (including the terms “ controlling ,” “ controlled by ” and “ under common control with ”) means the possession, direct or indirect, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of a Person, whether through the ownership of voting shares, by contract, or otherwise.
Cost Reconciliation Account ” has the meaning set forth in the Acquisition Agreement.

48



Defaulting Party ” has the meaning set forth in Section 8.1(a) .
Default Notice ” has the meaning set forth in Section 8.1(a) .
Default Period ” has the meaning set forth in Section 8.1(a) .
Developed Assets ” means all Subject Assets included within a Drilling Unit in which at least one well in which the Parties hold an economic interest has been spudded.
Development Area ” means the area described on Exhibit A-1 , as may be expanded pursuant to Section 5.3(d) , and includes the CNX Operated Area and the NBL Operated Area, provided that the Development Area shall not include any Lease or other property (or portion thereof) to the extent that it is an Excluded Asset or that is otherwise excluded from this Agreement pursuant to ARTICLE V .
Development Costs ” means costs and expenses incurred in the conduct of Development Operations or Area-Wide Operations, and all other fees, costs and expenses chargeable to the Parties under this Agreement or any Associated Agreement, including the fees, costs and expenses chargeable under Section 2.11 .
Development Operation ” means any operation with respect to the Subject Assets or lands pooled thereunder conducted pursuant to any Applicable Operating Agreement.
Development Plan ” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.2(a) .
Development Services ” means the services described in the introductory paragraphs of Section III of Exhibit “C” to the Master JOA; provided, however, Development Services shall not include those services specifically covered by the fixed rates as set forth in Exhibit “C” to the Master JOA.
Drilling and Completion Costs ” means all of CONSOL's and its Affiliates' Share of Development Costs, attributable to (a) examining title and preparing locations for wells, (b)  the drilling, testing, completing, deepening, recompleting, sidetracking, reworking and plugging back of wells, (c) the plugging and abandoning of dry holes or wells no longer capable of producing in paying quantities, (d) the equipping of wells for production (including costs of mobilizing and demobilizing drilling and workover rigs to and from the well-site) and construction of infrastructure and facilities in order to transport the Hydrocarbons produced from any wells part of the Subject Assets to the lease tank or gathering system, (e) permitting, (f)  reclamation and related costs and (g) drilling overhead chargeable under the Applicable Operating Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, Drilling and Completion Costs shall not include (i) the costs of construction and operation of gathering and transportation systems, central delivery facilities or pipelines, (ii) any remedial operations (including sidetracking, deepening, reworking or plugging back operations) that are taken with respect to a well after the well has been drilled and initially completed, (iii) lease operating expenses, or (iv) costs of acquiring Fill-In Interests or Option Interests.
Drilling Unit ” means the area fixed for the drilling of one well by order or rule of any applicable Governmental Authority. If a Drilling Unit is not fixed by any such rule or order, then a “ Drilling Unit ” shall be the drilling unit as reasonably established by the pattern of drilling in the applicable Operated Area unless otherwise agreed by the Parties.
Drip Condensate Production ” means, with respect to a Party, such Party's and its Affiliates' respective share of condensate collected from its Production by a gatherer in or from such gatherer's gathering system.
Electing Party ” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.5(a)(ii).

49



Election Period ” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.3(a) .
Entitlement ” means that quantity of Hydrocarbons produced from the Subject Assets for which a Party has the right to take delivery pursuant to the terms of any Applicable Operating Agreement, any other applicable agreement or applicable Law.
Excess Gas Production ” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.10(c)(ii) .
Excluded Asset ” has the meaning set forth in the Acquisition Agreement.
Excluded Units ” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.3(c) .
Expansion County ” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.3(c) .
Expansion Request ” has the meaning in Section 2.3(c).
Fair Market Value ” means the fair market value (expressed in U.S. dollars) of all or a portion of the assets and properties subject to such determination that a willing buyer would pay a willing seller in an arm's length transaction. Fair Market Value shall be agreed upon in good faith by the Parties to whom such determination relates; provided that if the Parties are unable to agree upon a determination of Fair Market Value, any such Party may have such matter determined by an expert in accordance with Section 11.7(b) .
Fill-In Interest ” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.2 .
Force Majeure Event ” means any (i) act of God, (ii) change in Law (or administrative action or inaction in respect of Law), or (iii) with respect to a given Party, a breach of an Associated Agreement by another Party or its Affiliates (other than a Third Party), that in any such case prevents a Party from complying with its respective obligations (other than obligations relating to the payment of monies when due), but only insofar as and only for so long as such event prevents such compliance.
Gas Production ” means, with respect to a Party, such Party's and its Affiliates' respective share of Production (other than Wellhead Condensate Production and Drip Condensate Production).
Governmental Authority ” means any federal, state, local, municipal, tribal or other government; any governmental, regulatory or administrative agency, commission, body or other authority exercising or entitle to exercise any administrative, executive, judicial, legislative, belief, regulatory or taxing authority or power; and any court or governmental tribunal, including any tribal authority having or asserting jurisdiction.
HSE Committee ” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.1(g) .
HSE Program ” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.5(c)(i) .
Hydrocarbons ” means oil and gas and other hydrocarbons (including condensate) produced or processed in association therewith (whether or not such item is in liquid or gaseous form), or any combination thereof, and any minerals produced in association therewith.
Immaterial Interest ” means, with respect to any Party, any overriding royalty interest, production payment, net profits interest or similar interest that is carved out of such Party's interests in the Subject Assets, the Transfer of which interest would not convey a material portion of the value of the Party's interest in the Subject Assets.

50



Initial Default Date ” means the date on which a Party is obligated to pay or advance its Share of Development Costs or, in the case of Noble, the Carried Costs pursuant to Section 7.2 or the Post Closing Cash Payments as provided in Section 7.4 .
Interim Marketing Period ” means the period beginning on the date hereof and ending on (a) if Noble in its sole discretion gives CONSOL Operator written notice on or prior to January 30, 2012 that it is terminating the Interim Gas Marketing Period, then March 31, 2012, (b) if Noble in its sole discretion gives CONSOL Operator written notice on or prior to August 31, 2012 that it is terminating the Interim Gas Marketing Period, then October 31, 2012, and (c) in all other situations, March 31, 2013.
Joint Development Committee ” means the committee created pursuant to Section 3.1(a) .
Joint Development Interest ” means, with respect to a Party, all of such Party's leasehold, working and mineral fee interest and obligations with respect to Subject Assets within the Development Area.
Joint Development Operating Agreement ” each of the Master JOA and each Unit JOA.
Law ” means any applicable statute, law, rule, regulation, ordinance, order, code, ruling, writ, injunction, decree or other official act of or by any Governmental Authority.
Lease ” means any oil, gas and mineral lease or sublease, royalty in oil and gas, overriding royalty in oil and gas, production payment in oil and gas, oil and gas mineral fee interest or other right to oil and gas in place. For clarity, the term “ Lease ” shall not include any rights or interests in coal or coalbed methane.
Lockup Termination Date ” has the meaning set forth in Section 7.6 .
Marcellus Formation ” means, (a) in central Pennsylvania, specifically from the top of the Burkett in the DeArmitt #1 (API 37-129-27246) and 7000'MD through to the top of the Onondaga at 7530'MD and illustrated in the log attached on Exhibit H ; (b) in southwest Pennsylvania, specifically from the top of the Burkett in the GH-10C-CV (API 37-059-25397) at 7600'MD through to the top of the Onondaga at 7900'MD and illustrated in the log attached on Exhibit H ; and (c) in West Virginia, specifically from the top of the Burkett in the DEPI #14815 (API 47-001-02850) at 7350'MD through to the top of the Onondaga at 7710'MD and illustrated in the log attached on Exhibit H .
Marketer ” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.10(b)(i) .
Marketing Fee ” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.11(c) .
Marketing Transaction ” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.10(b)(i) .
MarkWest ” has the meaning set forth in the Acquisition Agreement.
Master JOA ” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.4(a) .
Master JOA Memoranda ” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.4(b) .
MMBtu ” means one million British thermal units.
NAESB Agreement ” has the meaning set forth in the Acquisition Agreement.
NBL Acceleration Trigger ” has the meaning set forth in Section 8.2(b) .
NBL Balance ” means the sum of the Carried Costs Balance and the Post Closing Cash Payments

51



Balance.
NBL Balance Payment ” has the meaning set forth in Section 8.2(b) .
NBL Operated Area ” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.3(b) , subject to the provisions of Section 2.3(c) , Section 2.3(d) and Section 5.3(d) .
NBL Payment Default ” has the meaning set forth in Section 8.2(b) .
Negotiating Party ” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.10(c)(iii).
Noble ” has the meaning set forth in the Preamble.
Noble Master JOA Memorandum ” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.4(b) .
Noble Operator ” means Noble or any Affiliate of Noble designated by Noble or, to the extent permitted by Section 4.1(b)(ii), any transferee that upon consummation of such Transfer will hold at least a 25% Participating Interest.
Noble Secondment Agreement ” has the meaning set forth in the Acquisition Agreement.
Noble Unit JOA Memorandum ” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.4(d) .
Non-Acquiring Parties ” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.3(a) .
“Non-Consent Account ” means the Tax Partnership Account to which the Carried Costs Amount is made pursuant to Section 3.5(b)(i).
Non-Consent Right ” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.5 .
Non-Consent Wells ” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.5(a)(ii) .
Non-Consent Year ” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.5(a)(i) .
Non-Consenting Party ” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.5(a)(ii) .
Non-Defaulting Parties ” has the meaning set forth in Section 8.1(a) .
Non-Terminable Contracts ” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.5(a)(v).
Non-Terminable Contract Obligations ” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.5(a)(v).
Offered Interest ” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.4(a) .
Oil and Gas Assets ” has the meaning set forth in the Acquisition Agreement.
Operated Area ” means the CNX Operated Area when used in reference to CONSOL Operator and the NBL Operated Area when used in reference to Noble Operator.
Operating Expenses ” means costs and expenses reasonably necessary to continue operating, maintaining and producing wells and related surface equipment included in the Subject Assets in a manner consistent with past practices, industry standards and applicable Law.

52



Operatorship Transition Period ” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.3(d) .
Option Interests ” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.3(a) .
P&A/Condemned Assets ” means all Subject Assets (i) included within a Drilling Unit in which at least one well in which the Parties hold an economic interest has been drilled and plugged and abandoned or (ii) that have been condemned for drilling by agreement of the Parties or the Joint Development Committee.
Package Sale ” means an acquisition covering assets within the Development Area together with other assets outside of the Development Area as part of a wider transaction.
Participating Interest ” means the percentage set forth next to such Party's name in Section 2.2(a) , as adjusted pursuant to Section 2.2(b) to reflect each Party's undivided share of the aggregate rights and obligations of the Parties under the terms of (a) this Agreement and (b) each Applicable Operating Agreement.
“Party” or “Parties” has the meaning set forth in the Preamble.
Party Operator ” means CONSOL Operator and/or Noble Operator, as appropriate.
Party Representative ” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.1(i) .
Payment Date ” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.3(b) .
Payment Default ” has the meaning set forth in Section 8.1(a) .
Peoples Contract ” means that Base Contract for the Sale and Purchase of Natural Gas - Market Area, between Dominion Exploration & Production (as Seller) and The Peoples Natural Gas Company (as Buyer), dated May 9, 2001.
Person ” means any individual, corporation, company, partnership, limited partnership, limited liability company, trust, estate, Governmental Authority or any other entity.
Post Closing Cash Payments ” has the meaning set forth in the Acquisition Agreement.
Post Closing Cash Payments Balance ” means, as of any time, the difference between the Post Closing Cash Payments and that portion of the Post Closing Cash Payments (including the Closing Cash Payment) previously paid by Noble as of such time.
Press Release ” means any press release or other public statement that is released by a Party on PR Newswire, Business Wire or another similar national media distribution outlet, other than (x) any press release or other public statement that contains non-public financial information concerning the issuing Party not related to the activities contemplated hereby or (y) any press release or other public statement relating to an earnings release.
Processed Gas Production ” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.10(b)(i) .
Processing Agreements ” has the meaning set forth in the Acquisition Agreement.
Production ” means, with respect to a Party, such Party's and its Affiliates' respective share of Hydrocarbon production from any of their interests in the Subject Assets.
Proposed Processing Agreement ” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.10(c)(iii).

53



Residual Gas Production ” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.10(b)(i) .
Restricted Period ” has the meaning set forth in Section 5.4(b)(iv) .
ROFO Notice ” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.4(a) .
ROFO Offer ” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.4(a) .
ROFO Parties ” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.4(a) .
Services Costs ” means the costs attributable to Development Services provided by each Party Operator as set forth in the Annual Plan and Budget or as determined pursuant to Section 2.11(d) .
Share of Development Costs ” means, with respect to any Party, (i) such Party's Working Interest share of Development Costs to the extent such Development Costs relate to such Party's Working Interest in any Subject Asset and (ii) such Party's Participating Interest share of Development Costs in all other cases.
Subject Assets ” means all right, title and interest of the Parties within the Development Area in and to the Oil and Gas Assets and any Leases and related assets acquired under ARTICLE  V , insofar and only insofar as such Leases and related assets cover or relate to depths within the Marcellus Formation, in each case, in which two or more non-Affiliated Parties hold an interest. For clarity, except as expressly provided in ARTICLE V , all Leases and related assets owned by one or more Parties within the Development Area that cover depths outside the Marcellus Formation shall not be Subject Assets or subject to this Agreement.
Tax Partnership ” has the meaning set forth in Section 6.1 .
Tax Partnership Account ” has the meaning set forth in the Acquisition Agreement.
Tax Partnership Agreement ” has the meaning set forth in the Acquisition Agreement.
Tax Purposes ” has the meaning set forth in Section 6.1 .
Termination Date ” has the meaning set forth in Section 10.1 .
Third Party ” or “ Third Parties ” means any Person not a Party or an Affiliate of a Party.
Third Party Operating Agreement ” means an operating agreement to which there are Persons other than (or in addition to) the Parties and a Party Operator that are parties and that burden certain of the Subject Assets within the Development Area.
Third Party Operator ” means a Third Party under a Third Party Operating Agreement that is not a Party Operator.
Total Amount ” has the meaning set forth in the Acquisition Agreement.
Total Amount in Default ” means, as of any time, the following amounts: (a) the amounts that the Defaulting Party has failed to pay under the terms of this Agreement (including, in the case of Noble, any amounts relating to a failure to pay the Total Amount) and the Associated Agreements as of such time; (b) all reasonable attorneys' fees and other reasonable costs sustained in the collection of amounts owed by the Defaulting Party and (c) any interest at the Agreed Rate accrued on the amounts set forth in clauses (a) and (b).

54



Total Cost Sharing Payments ” means the sum of the Closing Cash Payment and the amounts described in Sections 3.1(b)(ii) and 3.1(b)(iii) of the Acquisition Agreement.
Transfer(s) ” or “ Transferred ” means any sale, assignment, pledge, encumbrance or other disposition by a Party of all or any part of its Joint Development Interest or the granting of any overriding royalty interest, production payment, net profits interest or other similar interest covering all or any part of a Party's interest in the Subject Assets.
Transferor ” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.4(a) .
Treasury Regulations ” means the regulations promulgated by the United States Department of the Treasury pursuant to and in respect of provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. All references herein to sections of the Treasury Regulations shall include any corresponding provision or provisions of succeeding, similar, substitute, proposed or final Treasury Regulations.
Unit JOA ” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.4(c) .
Unit JOA Memoranda ” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.4(d) .
Wellhead Condensate Production ” means, with respect to a Party, such Party's and its Affiliates' respective share of wellhead condensate produced and separated from any of their interests in the Subject Assets at the wellhead.
Working Interest ” means, with respect to any unit, well or lease, the interest that is burdened with the obligation to bear and pay costs and expenses of maintenance, development and operations on or in connection with such unit, well or lease, but without regard to the effect of any royalties, overriding royalties, production payments, net profits interests and other similar burdens upon, measured by, or payable out of production therefrom.



55
Exhibit 10.2

CLOSING AGREEMENT

This Closing Agreement (this “ Agreement ”) is made and entered into this 30 th day of September, 2011, by and between CNX Gas Company LLC (“ CONSOL ”) and Noble Energy, Inc. (“ Noble ”). CONSOL and Noble are sometimes referred to herein as a “ Party ” and collectively as “ Parties ”. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Agreement will have the meanings given to such terms in the Acquisition Agreement (defined below).

RECITALS

The Parties entered into that certain Asset Acquisition Agreement, dated August 17, 2011 (as amended from time to time, the “ Acquisition Agreement ”).

The Parties desire to memorialize certain mutual agreements relating to the Closing of the transactions contemplated by the Acquisition Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE , for and in consideration of the mutual agreements herein contained, the benefits to be derived by each Party, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows:

1.
McDowell Wells . The wells in McDowell county, West Virginia, that are more particularly described on Annex I (the “ McDowell Wells ”) shall be deemed to be deleted from Exhibit B to the Acquisition Agreement and shall be deemed to be Excluded Assets for purposes of the Acquisition Agreement. Further, in respect of the McDowell Wells, the amount of the Producing Properties Cash Payment shall be reduced by the amount set forth on Schedule I .

2.
Adjustments to Closing Cash Payments . The Parties agree that Section 3.2(b)(vi) of the Acquisition Agreement shall be replaced with the following:
“(vi)      [Intentionally Omitted]; and”
3.
Additional Wells; Additional Well Costs . The Parties acknowledge (a) that, in addition to the Wells listed on Exhibit B to the Acquisition Agreement, Noble will be acquiring an interest in certain additional wells that have been drilled and completed, such wells being set forth on Annex II , and wells that have been spudded but not completed (the “ Additional Wells ”) and (b) that CONSOL has incurred prior to the Effective Time and paid certain Property Expenses and other costs and expenses attributable to the interest that Noble is acquiring in such Additional Wells (the “ Additional Well Costs ”). The Parties hereby agree that, in respect of the Additional Wells and the Additional Well Costs, a new Section 3.2(a)(vi) shall be added to the Acquisition Agreement, which shall read as follows:
“(vi)      an amount equal to all Additional Well Costs (as defined in that certain Closing Agreement, dated as of the Closing Date, between CONSOL and Noble (the “ Closing Agreement ”)) incurred prior to the Effective Time and paid by or on behalf of CONSOL that are attributable to the interest that Noble will acquire in the Additional Wells (as defined in the Closing Agreement).”
4.
Additional and Excluded Leases and Fee Interests . The Leases listed on Annex III-1 as “Additional Unscheduled Leases” (the “ Additional Unscheduled Leases ”) shall be deemed to be added to Part 1 (Non-Producing Leases) of Exhibit A to the Acquisition Agreement and

1

shall be deemed to be Leases for purposes of the Acquisition Agreement. The Leases listed on Annex III-2 as “Additional Producing Leases” (the “ Additional Producing Leases ”) shall be deemed to be added to Part 2 (Producing Leases) of Exhibit A to the Acquisition Agreement and shall be deemed to be Leases for purposes of the Acquisition Agreement. The Leases listed on Annex III-3 as “Excluded Leases” (the “ Excluded Leases ”) shall be deemed to be deleted from Exhibit A to the Acquisition Agreement and shall be deemed to be Excluded Assets for purposes of the Acquisition Agreement. Further, (a) in respect of the Additional Unscheduled Leases, the First Cash Payment, the Second Cash Payment, the Third Cash Payment and the Carried Cost Obligation shall each be increased by the amounts set forth on Schedule I and (b) in respect of the Excluded Leases, the First Cash Payment, the Second Cash Payment, the Third Cash Payment and the Carried Cost Obligation shall each be decreased by the amounts set forth on Schedule I .

5.
Net Acres and Leases . With respect to each of the Leases listed on Annex IV (the “ Revised Scheduled Leases ”), the Conveyed Interests may only contain the Net Acres set forth for such Lease on Annex IV (which is less than the Net Acres set forth for such Lease on Exhibit A and Schedule 1.1 to the Acquisition Agreement). For purposes of Closing, CONSOL agrees to assume that each Revised Scheduled Lease contains only the Net Acres set forth for such Revised Scheduled Lease on Annex IV and, as a result of such assumption, the Parties agree that (a) Net Acres for each Revised Scheduled Lease as listed on Exhibit A and Schedule 1.1 to the Acquisition Agreement shall be deemed to be replaced with the corresponding Net Acres set forth on Annex IV , (b) Allocated Value for each Revised Scheduled Lease as listed on Schedule 1.1 to the Acquisition Agreement shall be deemed to be replaced with the corresponding Allocated Value set forth on Annex IV , and (c) the First Cash Payment, the Second Cash Payment, the Third Cash Payment and the Carried Cost Obligation shall each be decreased by the amounts set forth on Schedule I . Notwithstanding the foregoing, following the Closing and prior to the Title Defect Claim Date, if CONSOL is able to establish (either pursuant to the Parties mutual agreement or pursuant to the title dispute resolution procedures set forth in Section 5.3(j) of the Acquisition Agreement, which shall apply mutatis mutandis ) that any Revised Scheduled Lease contains a greater number of Net Acres than the Net Acres set forth for such Revised Scheduled Lease on Annex IV , then with respect to any such Revised Schedule Lease, the Parties agree that, in lieu of treating such additional Net Acres as a Title Benefit under the terms of the Acquisition Agreement, the Parties will increase (a) the amount of each of the First Cash Payment, the Second Cash Payment, the Third Cash Payment by one-third of one-half of the Allocated Value associated with the additional Net Acres attributable to such Revised Scheduled Lease (provided that if Noble made any of the foregoing cash payments prior to the date that CONSOL is able to establish that any Revised Scheduled Lease contains a greater number of Net Acres than the Net Acres set forth for such Revised Scheduled Lease on Annex IV , then within 5 Business Days after such Net Acres amount is established Noble shall pay to the applicable Cost Reconciliation Account the amount it would have been required to pay in connection with the payment of such prior cash payment(s) if such greater Net Acres had been established prior to the date of such payments(s)) and (b) the Carried Cost Obligation by one-half of the Allocated Value associated with the additional Net Acres attributable to such Revised Scheduled Lease.

6.
Duplicate Leases . With respect to each of the Leases listed on Annex V (the “ Duplicate Leases ”), the Parties agree that (a) each Duplicative Lease is reflected more than once on Exhibit A to the Acquisition Agreement, (b) all references on Exhibit A and Schedule 1.1 to the Acquisition Agreement to the Duplicate Leases shall be deemed to be deleted and the

2

references to the Duplicate Leases on Annex V shall be deemed to be added to Exhibit A and Schedule 1.1 to the Acquisition Agreement, and (c) the First Cash Payment shall be decreased by the amount set forth on Schedule I .

7.
Minimum Net Acres . The Parties agree that, in respect of the Additional Unscheduled Leases, the Additional Production Leases, the Excluded Leases, the Duplicate Leases, the Revised Scheduled Leases, the Hard Consent Assets and the Preferential Purchase Right Assets, Schedule 1.2 to the Acquisition Agreement shall be replaced Schedule 1.2 attached hereto as Annex VI .

8.
Conveyed Interests . The Parties agree that Section 2.1(a)(i) of the Acquisition Agreement shall be replaced with the following:
“(i)      the oil, gas and/or mineral leases and oil and gas and mineral fee interests more particularly described in Exhibit A , insofar and only insofar as such leases and oil and gas and mineral fee interests cover depths within the Marcellus Formation (such 50% of CONSOL's interest in such leases and oil and gas and mineral fee interests as so limited, collectively, the “ Leases ”), including all working interests, overriding royalty interests, net profits interests, carried interests or similar rights or interest in the Leases, and together with all rights, privileges, benefits and powers conferred upon the holder of such oil, gas and/or mineral leases with respect to the use and occupation of the surface of the lands covered thereby that may be necessary, convenient or incidental to the possession and enjoyment of such oil, gas and/or mineral leases;”
9.
Retained Interests . The Parties agree that the definition of “Retained Interests” that is used in the Acquisition Agreement shall be replaced with the following definition:
“' Retained Interest ' means (a) all of CONSOL's rights in and to the oil, gas and/or mineral leases and oil and gas and mineral fee interests described in Exhibit A , insofar and only insofar as such leases and oil and gas and mineral fee interests cover depths and formations outside of the Marcellus Formation, and (b) a non-exclusive right to use the surface and install pipelines and gathering systems in connection with the ownership or operation of such leases and interests with respect to such depths and formations, and all wells to the extent associated therewith.”
10.
Additional Interests . The term “Additional Interests” as defined in the Acquisition Agreement and the Development Agreement shall be deemed to exclude any Leases in the Development Area that have been acquired since April 29, 2011 by CONSOL from any of its Affiliates.

11.
Indemnity Provisions . The Parties agree that Section 13.12 of the Acquisition Agreement shall be removed from the Acquisition Agreement and given no force or effect.

12.
Well No. 015903 . The Parties acknowledge that the Lease referenced in Exhibit B to the Acquisition Agreement for Well No. 015903 (API # 3712927880) is “MAWC TR 25 BOWMAN #4” (and not “MAWC TR 7 BOWMAN #4”) and that such reference will be corrected in the Assignment that is executed at Closing.

13.
Environmental Defects . The Parties acknowledge that Noble did not deliver an Environmental Defect Notice on or prior to the Environmental Defect Claim Date and, at Closing, no adjustments will be made to the Closing Cash Payment in respect of any alleged Environmental Defects.

3


14.
Pre-Closing Title Defects . The Parties acknowledge that Noble did not deliver a Title Defect Notice on or prior to Closing and, at Closing, no adjustments will be made to the Closing Cash Payment in respect of any alleged Title Defects.

15.
Consent Schedule . The following Consents shall be deemed to be added to Schedule 7.4 of the Acquisition Agreement:
Lease Consents :
Lease Number / Reference
Agreement Name
Agreement Date
County
State
LW-1334
Lease
2/1/1935
Greene
PA
L208654
Oil and Gas Lease
10/22/2008
Westmoreland
PA
L210136
Paid-Up Lease
6/2/2010
Westmoreland
PA

Agreements :
Reference Number
Agreement Name
Parties
Agreement Date
County
State
 
Oil & Gas Sublease Agreement (as amended)
NiSource Energy Ventures, LLC, Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC and CONSOL
7/27/2009
Greene (PA), Washington (PA) and Marshall (WV)
PA
WV

The following Consents shall be deemed to be removed from Schedule 7.4 of the Acquisition Agreement:
Operating Agreement Consents:

Lease Number / Reference
Agreement Name
Agreement Date
County
State
3,032
Operating Agreement
6/19/2009
Washington
PA
316,374
Operating Agreement
8/3/1982
Upshur
WV

Farmout Consents:

Lease Number / Reference
Agreement Name
Agreement Date
County
State
311,776
Farmout Agreement
7/14/2003
Braxton
WV

16.
Material Contracts Schedule . The following Contracts shall be deemed to be added to Schedule 7.8 of the Acquisition Agreement:

4


Agreements :
Reference Number
Agreement Name
Parties
Agreement Date
County
State
 
Oil & Gas Sublease Agreement (as amended)
NiSource Energy Ventures, LLC, Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC and CONSOL
7/27/2009
Greene (PA), Washington (PA) and Marshall (WV)
PA
WV

17.
Preferential Purchase Right Schedule . The following Preferential Purchase Right shall be deemed to be removed from Schedule 7.10 of the Acquisition Agreement:
Operating Agreements:

Number / Reference
Agreement Name
Agreement Date
County
State
3,032
Operating Agreement
6/19/2009
Washington
PA
316,374
Operating Agreement
8/3/1982
Upshur
WV

Deeds:

Number / Reference
Agreement Name
Agreement Date
County
State
72,666
Deed
8/7/2008
Washington
PA
268,021
General Warranty Deed
2/24/1994
Washington
PA
623,235
Deed
4/9/1968
Marshall
WV
623,236
Deed
4/10/1968
Marshall
WV
623,237
Deed
8/3/1968
Marshall
WV
625,272
General Warranty Deed
11/17/2004
Marshall
WV
702,057
Deed
3/31/1951
Ohio
WV

Options:

Number / Reference
Agreement Name
Agreement Date
County
State
625,388
Option to Purchase
7/10/2008
Marshall
WV

Farmouts:

Number / Reference
Agreement Name
Agreement Date
County
State
311,776
Farmout Agreement
7/14/2003
Braxton
WV


5

Agreements:

Number / Reference
Agreement Name
Agreement Date
County
State
OPAG094
Basic Agreement
4/1/1977
Allegheny, Bedford, Blair, Cambria, Centre, Clinton, Fayette, Greene, Somerset, Washington & Westmoreland
PA

18.
Hard/Soft Consents . CONSOL has not obtained those Consents set forth on Annex VII . The Consents listed on Annex VII that are marked with a “” in the column entitled “Hard Consent” are referred to herein as the “ Hard Consents , ” and the remaining Consents listed on Annex VII are referred to herein as the “ Soft Consents.
With respect to the Soft Consents, in accordance with Section 5.5(b)(ii) of the Acquisition Agreement, (a) the Conveyed Interests subject to the Soft Consents shall be assigned to Noble by CONSOL at Closing as part of the Conveyed Interests and (b) any Liability that arises due to the failure to obtain any Soft Consent shall be borne 50% by CONSOL and 50% by Noble. With respect to the Hard Consents, in accordance with Section 5.5(b)(i) of the Acquisition Agreement, (i) the Conveyed Interests affected by the Hard Consents (the “ Hard Consent Assets ”) shall be excluded from the Conveyed Interests assigned to Noble by CONSOL at Closing and (ii) the Closing Cash Payment shall be reduced by the Allocated Value of the Hard Consent Assets, which Hard Consent Assets and their associated Allocated Values are as set forth on Annex VII .

Section 5.5(b)(i) of the Acquisition Agreement shall continue to apply to the Parties with respect to the Hard Consents and the associated Hard Consent Assets from and after the Closing.

19.
Preferential Purchase Rights . The Preferential Purchase Rights listed on Annex VIII have either (a) not been waived by the appropriate party and the period for exercising such Preferential Purchase Right has not lapsed (the “ Outstanding Preferential Purchase Rights ”) or (b) been exercised by the appropriate party (the “ Exercised Preferential Purchase Rights ”). The Exercised Preferential Purchase Rights are marked with a “” in the column entitled “Exercised” on Annex VIII .
In accordance with Section 5.5(a)(i) of the Acquisition Agreement, (a) the Conveyed Interests subject to Outstanding Preferential Purchase Rights and the Exercised Preferential Purchase Rights (the “ Preferential Purchase Right Assets ”) shall be excluded from the Conveyed Interests to be assigned to Noble by CONSOL at Closing and (b) the Closing Cash Payment shall be reduced by the Allocated Value of the Preferential Purchase Right Assets, which Preferential Purchase Right Assets and their associated Allocated Values are as set forth on Annex VIII .
The Parties further acknowledge that Section 5.5(a)(i) of the Acquisition Agreement shall continue to apply to the Parties with respect to the Outstanding Preferential Purchase Rights and the Exercised Preferential Purchase Rights and the associated Preferential Purchase Right Assets from and after the Closing.
20.
Sublease Agreement . With respect to that certain Oil & Gas Sublease Agreement, dated July

6

27, 2009, between NiSource Energy Ventures, LLC, Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC and CONSOL (as amended, the “ Sublease Agreement ”), (a) the Sublease Agreement shall be deemed to be an Applicable Contract and Noble shall acquire an interest therein at Closing in accordance with the Acquisition Agreement, (b) for purposes of Sections 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3 of the Acquisition Agreement, CONSOL shall be treated as if, as of the Closing Date, it had earned and had record title to an interest in the Leases subject to the Sublease Agreement, which Leases are set forth on Annex IX (the “ NiSource/Columbia Leases ”), as contemplated by the Sublease Agreement (c) solely for purposes of determining which Leases are actually assigned to Noble by CONSOL at Closing, the NiSource/Columbia Leases shall be deemed to be removed from Exhibit A to the Acquisition Agreement and from Exhibit A to the New Assignment (defined below), and (d) the term Permitted Encumbrances shall be deemed to include the terms and conditions of the Sublease Agreement so long as the net cumulative effect of the Sublease Agreement (which net cumulative effect will be determined assuming the conditions applicable to earning the NiSource/Columbia Leases under the Sublease Agreement have been satisfied and that CONSOL had actually received an assignment of the NiSource/Columbia Leases as of the Closing Date) does not (i) operate to reduce the Net Revenue Interest of CONSOL with respect to any NiSource/Columbia Lease to an amount less than the Net Revenue Interest set forth in Exhibit A to the Acquisition Agreement for such NiSource/Columbia Lease, and (ii) reduce the Net Acres in any Area to less than the Minimum Net Acres for such Area. The Parties further acknowledge that the Sublease Agreement requires the Parties to conduct certain drilling operations in order to earn the NiSource/Columbia Leases and that any future assignment of any NiSource/Columbia Lease to either CONSOL or Noble in accordance with the terms of the Sublease Agreement shall not be subject to the terms of Article V of the Development Agreement.

21.
Gathering Contracts . With respect to the Gathering Contracts, certain agreements of the Parties are set forth on Schedule II .

22.
Rights-of-Way . The rights-of-way exhibit that is attached as Exhibit C to the Acquisition Agreement shall be replaced with the rights-of-way exhibits attached to the counterparts of the New Assignment .

23.
Excluded Assets . The Parties agree that the definition of “Excluded Assets” shall include all SCADA and similar control equipment and network communication towers and Federal Communication Commission licenses.

24.
Assignment and Bill of Sale . At Closing, in lieu of executing the form of Assignment attached to the Acquisition Agreement, the Parties shall execute the form of Assignment and Bill of Sale and form of Mineral Interest Deed attached hereto as Annex X-1 and Annex X-2 (collectively, the “ New Assignment ”) and all references in the Acquisition Agreement to the “Assignment” shall hereafter be deemed to refer to the New Assignment.

25.
Development Agreement . At Closing, in lieu of executing the form of Development Agreement (including Exhibits) attached to the Acquisition Agreement, the Parties shall execute the form of Development Agreement (including Exhibits) attached hereto as Annex XI (collectively, the “ New Development Agreement ”) and all references in the Acquisition Agreement to the “Development Agreement” shall hereafter be deemed to refer to the New Development Agreement.


7

26.
Development Plan and Annual Plan and Budget . The Parties agree to, and to cause their representatives on the Joint Development Committee (as defined in the New Development Agreement) use their commercially reasonable efforts to mutually agree upon a more detailed Development Plan (as such term is defined in the New Development Agreement) and Annual Plan and Budget (as such term is defined in the New Development Agreement) for calendar year 2012, in each case, prior to December 15, 2011. If the Parties are able to reach such agreement, such agreed upon Development Plan and/or Annual Plan and Budget, as applicable, will replace the Development Plan attached to the New Development Agreement as Exhibit E and/or the Annual Plan and Budget attached to the New Development Agreement as Exhibit F , as applicable; provided that if the Parties are unable to reach such agreement, the Development Plan attached as of the date hereof to the New Development Agreement as Exhibit E and/or the Annual Plan and Budget attached as of the date hereof to the New Development Agreement as Exhibit F , as applicable, shall remain in effect.

27.
Tax Partnership Agreement . With respect to the Tax Partnership Agreement, certain agreements of the Parties are set forth on Schedule III .

28.
NAESB Agreement . At Closing, in lieu of executing the form of NAESB Agreement attached to the Acquisition Agreement, the Parties shall execute the form of NAESB Agreement attached hereto as Annex XII (the “ New NAESB Agreement ”) and all references in the Acquisition Agreement to the “NAESB Agreement” shall hereafter be deemed to refer to the New NAESB Agreement.

29.
Recordings . The Parties agree that the Assignments and Bills of Sale (including any associated affidavits of tax value), Deeds and Mineral Interest Deeds being executed by the Parties, as a result of, inter alia, acreage additions or deletions, may include allocated tax values for the Conveyed Interests that are different than the Allocated Values attributable to such Conveyed Interests under the Acquisition Agreement and this Agreement. Accordingly, the Parties agree that they shall cooperate with each other prior to the recording of such Assignments and Bills of Sale, Deeds and Mineral Interest Deeds to ensure that the allocated tax values for the Conveyed Interests are consistent with the Allocated Values attributable to such Conveyed Interests under the Acquisition Agreement and this Agreement.
Further, the Parties agree that at Closing they will execute and deliver counterparts of the Master JOA Memoranda (as defined in the New Development Agreement) for each county in which each Master JOA Memorandum is to be recorded but that Exhibit A to each county counterpart of the Master JOA Memorandum will not be completed. The Parties agree that they shall cooperate with each other prior to the recording of each Master JOA Memorandum to complete and attach the applicable Exhibit A to each such county counterpart of the Master JOA Memorandum (and the Parties agree that each such Exhibit A shall be consistent with the relevant county portion of Exhibit A that is attached to the Master JOA (as defined in the New Development Agreement)).
30.
Ratification . The Parties hereby ratify and confirm the terms and provisions of the Acquisition Agreement, to the extent modified hereby, for all purposes.

[SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW]

8

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed and delivered this Closing Agreement as of the date first set forth above.

 
CONSOL:
CNX GAS COMPANY LLC

By: /s/ Stephen W. Johnson
Name: Stephen W. Johnson
Title: Vice President and Secretary

 
NOBLE:

NOBLE ENERGY, INC.

By: /s/ Shawn E. Conner
Name: Shawn E. Conner
Title: Vice President




9


Exhibit 10.3
AMENDMENT TO
CONSOL ENERGY INC.
SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN

Pursuant to the authority granted to the Company in Section 7.6 of the Consol Energy Inc. Supplemental Retirement Plan (the "Plan"), the Plan is amended as follows:
1. Section 1.4 is amended by adding a new subsection (e) to read as follows:

(e)      Effective December 31, 2011, this Plan will be frozen for all current and future employees except the following employees (the “Excepted Employees): (x) the five employees whose names are listed in the Summary Compensation Table for the Company's Proxy Statement dated March 24, 2011 (the “2011 Summary Compensation Table”) and (y) the three additional employees whose names would have been listed in the 2011 Summary Compensation Table assuming that Participants were executive officers of the Company on and after January 1, 2010 and that the 2011 Summary Compensation Table were expanded to include the six most highly compensated executive officers of the Company in addition to the Company's principal executive officer and principal financial officer. The Company shall no later than 30 days after the date of this Amendment make the determination (which determination shall be final and binding upon all Participants) under clause (y) of the foregoing sentence of the three additional employees whose names would have been listed in the 2011 Summary Compensation Table and provide those names to the Retirement Board. In accordance with the freezing of the Plan, and notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, the following will apply:
(i)      No employee can become a new Participant after December 31, 2011. For avoidance of doubt, this prohibition includes any employee who is not an Excepted Employee and who succeeds to a position held by an Excepted Employee.
(ii)      All Participants as of December 31, 2011 who are not Excepted Employees ("Frozen Participants") will have their benefit calculated and frozen as of such date using Annual Compensation, Final Average Compensation and Years of Service determined on December 31, 2011. No benefits will accrue after December 31, 2011.
(iii)      For said Frozen Participants, the Reduction for the Participant's Qualified Plan benefit in Section 2.2 of the Plan will also be calculated and frozen as of December 31, 2011.
(iv)      Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Frozen Participant's Years of Service will continue to accrue solely for vesting purposes only under Section 2.3, but will not count for any other purpose including calculation of the Service Fraction.
2. In all other respects, the Plan is unchanged.





Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, J. Brett Harvey, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of CONSOL Energy Inc.;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
Date:
October 31, 2011
 
 
 
 
/s/ J. Brett Harvey
 
J. Brett Harvey
 
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
 
(Principal Executive Officer)
 





Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS
 
I, William J. Lyons, certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of CONSOL Energy Inc.;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;

(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
Date:
October 31, 2011
 
 
 
 
/s/ William J. Lyons
 
William J. Lyons
 
Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 





Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I, J. Brett Harvey, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of CONSOL Energy Inc. (the “Registrant”), certify that to my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011, of the Registrant (the “Report”):
 
(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 
Date:
October 31, 2011
 
 
 
 
/s/ J. Brett Harvey
 
J. Brett Harvey
 
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
 






Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I, William J. Lyons, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of CONSOL Energy Inc. (the “Registrant”), certify that to my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011, of the Registrant (the “Report”):
 
(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date:
October 31, 2011
 
 
 
 
/s/ William J. Lyons
 
William J. Lyons
 
Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President