UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
Commission File No. 1-11083

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
(Exact Name Of Company As Specified In Its Charter)

DELAWARE
04-2695240
(State of Incorporation)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

ONE BOSTON SCIENTIFIC PLACE, NATICK, MASSACHUSETTS 01760-1537
(Address Of Principal Executive Offices)

(508) 650-8000
(Company’s Telephone Number)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

COMMON STOCK, $.01 PAR VALUE PER SHARE
NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE
(Title Of Class)
(Name of Exchange on Which Registered)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
NONE
________________
 
Indicate by check mark if the Company is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes: R       No £

Indicate by check mark if the Company is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes: £       No R

Indicate by check mark whether the Company (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Company was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes: R       No £

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Company’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. £

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Yes: R       No £

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes: £       No R

The aggregate market value of the Company’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the Company was approximately $21.8 billion based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on June 30, 2006, the last business day of the Company’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

The number of shares outstanding of the Company’s common stock as of January 31, 2007, was 1,480,340,219.
 


 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
 
24 
 
34 
 
34 
 
34 
 
34 
34 
 
34 
 
35 
 
36 
 
65 
 
66 
 
132 
 
132 
 
132 
132 
 
132 
 
141 
 
141 
 
141 
 
141 
141 
 
141 
151 
 
EX-10.2 FORM OF OMNIBUS AMENDMENT
EX-10.16 FORM OF DEFERRED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT
EX-10.21 FIFTH AMENDMENT TO 401(K) RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN
EX-10.23 2006 GLOBAL EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN
EX-10.24 FIRST AMENDMENT TO 2006 GLOBAL EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN
EX-10.46 GUIDANT CORPORATION 1994 STOCK PLAN, AS AMENDED
EX-10.47 GUIDANT CORPORATION 1996 NONEMPLOYEE DIRECTOR STOCK PLAN, AS AMENDED
EX-10.48 GUIDANT CORPORATION 1998 STOCK PLAN, AS AMENDED
EX-10.49 FORM OF GUIDANT CORPORATION OPTION GRANT
EX-10.50 FORM OF GUIDANT CORPORATION RESTRICTED STOCK GRANT
EX-10.51 GUIDANT CORPORATION EMPLOYEE SAVINGS AND STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN
EX-10.52 FIRST AMENDMENT TO GUIDANT CORPORATION EMPLOYEE SAVINGS AND STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN
EX-10.53 SECOND AMENDMENT TO GUIDANT CORPORATION EMPLOYEE SAVINGS AND STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN
EX-10.54 THIRD AMENDMENT TO GUIDANT CORPORATION EMPLOYEE SAVINGS AND STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN
EX-10.55 FOURTH AMENDMENT TO GUIDANT CORPORATION EMPLOYEE SAVINGS AND STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN
EX-10.56 FIFTH AMENDMENT TO GUIDANT CORPORATION EMPLOYEE SAVINGS AND STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN
EX-12 STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
EX-21 LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES AS OF 2/28/2007
EX-23 CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG, LLP
EX-31.1 SECTION 302 CEO CERTIFICATION
EX-31.2 SECTION 302 CFO CERTIFICATION
EX-32.1 SECTION 906 CEO CERTIFICATION
EX-32.2 SECTION 906 CFO CERTIFICATION
 
 
PART I
 
 
The Company
 
Boston Scientific Corporation is a worldwide developer, manufacturer and marketer of medical devices that are used in a broad range of interventional medical specialties including interventional cardiology, cardiac rhythm management, peripheral interventions, cardiac surgery, vascular surgery, electrophysiology, neurovascular intervention, oncology, endoscopy, urology, gynecology and neuromodulation. When used in this report, the terms we, “us,” “our” and the “Company” mean Boston Scientific Corporation and its divisions and subsidiaries.
 
Since we were formed in 1979, we have advanced the practice of less-invasive medicine by helping physicians and other medical professionals treat a variety of diseases and improve patients quality of life by providing alternatives to surgery and other medical procedures that are typically traumatic to the body. Some of our medical products are used for enlarging narrowed blood vessels to prevent heart attack and stroke; clearing passages blocked by plaque to restore blood flow; detecting and managing fast, slow or irregular heart rhythms; mapping electrical problems in the heart; opening obstructions and bringing relief to patients suffering from various forms of cancer; performing biopsies and intravascular ultrasounds; placing filters to prevent blood clots from reaching the lungs, heart or brain; treating urological, gynecological, renal, pulmonary, neurovascular and gastrointestinal diseases; and modulating nerve activity to treat deafness and chronic pain.
 
Our history began in the late 1960s when our co-founder, John Abele, acquired an equity interest in Medi-tech, Inc., a research and development company focused on developing alternatives to surgery. Medi-tech’s initial products, a family of steerable catheters, were introduced in 1969 and were used in some of the first less-invasive procedures performed. In 1979, John Abele joined with Pete Nicholas to form Boston Scientific Corporation, which indirectly acquired Medi-tech. This acquisition began a period of active and focused marketing, new product development and organizational growth. Since then, our net sales have increased substantially, growing from $1.8 million in 1979 to approximately $7.8 billion in 2006.
 
Our growth has been fueled in part by strategic acquisitions and alliances designed to improve our ability to take advantage of growth opportunities in the medical device industry. In 2006, we experienced a transforming event with our acquisition of Guidant Corporation, a world leader in the treatment of cardiac disease. This acquisition enabled us to become a major provider in the more than $9 billion global Cardiac Rhythm Management (CRM) business,  enhancing our overall competitive position and long-term growth potential and further diversifying our product portfolio. With this acquisition, we have become one of the world’s largest cardiovascular device companies and a global leader in microelectronic therapies. This and other acquisitions have helped us add promising new technologies to our pipeline and to offer one of the broadest product portfolios in the world for use in less-invasive procedures. We believe that the depth and breadth of our product portfolio has also enabled us to compete more effectively in, and better absorb the pressures of, the current healthcare environment of cost containment, managed care, large buying groups and hospital consolidation.
 
 
The Drug-Eluting Stent Opportunity
 
Our broad, innovative product offerings have enabled us to become a leader in the interventional cardiology market. This leadership is in large part due to our coronary stent product offerings. Coronary stents are tiny, mesh tubes used in the treatment of coronary artery disease and implanted in patients to prop open arteries and facilitate blood flow from the heart. We have further enhanced the outcomes associated with the use of coronary stents, particularly the processes that lead to restenosis (the growth of neointimal tissue within an artery after angioplasty and stenting), through dedicated internal and external product development and scientific research of drug-eluting stent systems.
 
Use of our products in the United States and abroad has demonstrated that drug-eluting stents reduce the need for repeat procedures—or more expensive surgical procedures—and reduce healthcare costs, as well as overall patient risk, trauma, procedure time and the need for aftercare. Since its U.S. launch in March 2004 and its launch in our Europe and Inter-Continental markets in 2003, our proprietary polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent technology for reducing coronary restenosis, the TAXUS® Express 2 ™ paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent system, has become the worldwide leader in the drug-eluting coronary stent market. In 2006, approximately 30 percent of our net sales were derived from sales of our TAXUS stent system.
 
We are continuing to enhance our product offerings in the coronary drug-eluting stent market. We recently launched our next-generation coronary stent, the TAXUS® Liberté™ paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent system, in our Europe and Inter-Continental markets, and we expect to launch the product in the U.S., subject to regulatory approval. The Liberté™ coronary stent is designed to further enhance deliverability and conformability, particularly in challenging lesions. Also, prior to our acquisition of Guidant, Abbott Laboratories acquired Guidant’s vascular intervention and endovascular solutions businesses and shares the drug-eluting technology it acquired from Guidant with us. This arrangement gives us access to a second drug-eluting stent program which complements our existing TAXUS coronary stent program. In the fourth quarter of 2006, we launched our PROMUS™ everolimus-eluting stent system in certain European countries and expect to launch the PROMUS stent system in certain other European markets in the first quarter of 2007, certain Inter-Continental markets in the second quarter of 2007 and in the U.S. in 2008, subject to regulatory approval.
 
Our U.S. TAXUS stent system sales decreased in 2006 relative to 2005, due in part to a decline in the U.S. market size due to recent uncertainty regarding the risk of late stent thrombosis following the use of drug-eluting stents. Late stent thrombosis is the formation of a clot, or thrombus, within the stented area one year or more after implantation of the stent. In the fourth quarter of 2006, the FDA held a special advisory panel meeting to discuss drug-eluting stents. Members of the panel concluded that drug-eluting stents remain safe and effective when used as indicated, and that the benefits outweigh the risks.
 
The Cardiac Rhythm Management Opportunity
 
As a result of our acquisition of Guidant in April 2006, we now develop, manufacture and market products that focus on the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias and heart failure. Natural electrical impulses stimulate the heart’s chambers to pump blood. In healthy individuals, the electrical current causes the heart to beat at an appropriate rate and in synchrony. We make a variety of implantable devices that can monitor the heart and deliver electricity to treat cardiac abnormalities, including:

·  
Implantable defibrillator systems used to detect and treat abnormally fast heart rhythms (tachycardia) that could result in sudden cardiac death, including implantable cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator systems used to treat heart failure; and
·  
Implantable pacemaker systems used to manage slow or irregular heart rhythms (bradycardia), including implantable cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker systems used to treat heart failure.
 
Tachycardia (abnormally fast or chaotic heart rhythms) can prevent the heart from pumping blood efficiently and can lead to sudden cardiac death. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator systems (defibrillators, leads, programmers, our LATITUDE® Patient Management System and accessories) monitor the heart and can deliver electrical energy, restoring a normal rhythm. Our defibrillators can deliver tiered therapy—a staged progression from lower intensity pacing pulses designed to correct the abnormal rhythm to more aggressive shocks to restore a heartbeat.

Heart failure (the heart’s inability to pump effectively) is a debilitating, progressive condition, with symptoms including shortness of breath and extreme fatigue. After a person is diagnosed with heart failure, the one-year mortality rate is high, with one in five people dying. Moreover, once diagnosed, sudden cardiac death occurs at six to nine times the rate of the general population. The condition is pervasive, with approximately five million people in the U.S. affected.

Bradycardia (slow or irregular heart rhythms) often results in a heart rate insufficient to provide adequate blood flow throughout the body, creating symptoms such as fatigue, dizziness and fainting. Cardiac pacemaker systems (pulse generators, leads, programmers and accessories) deliver electrical energy to stimulate the heart to beat more frequently and regularly. Pacemakers range from conventional single-chamber devices to more sophisticated adaptive-rate, dual-chamber devices.
 
Our remote monitoring system, the LATITUDE® Patient Management System, can be placed in a patient’s home (at their bedside) and reads implantable device information at times specified by the patient’s physician. The communicator can then transmit the data to a secure Internet server where the physician (or other third party) can access this medical information anytime, anywhere. In addition to automatic device data uploads, the communicator enables a daily confirmation of the patient’s device status, providing assurance the device is operating properly. Available as an optional component to the system is the LATITUDE Weight Scale and Blood Pressure Monitor. Weight and blood pressure data is captured by the communicator and sent to the secure server for review by the patient’s physician (or other technician). In addition, this weight and blood information is immediately available to patients in their home to assist their compliance with the day-to-day and home-based heart failure instructions prescribed by their physician.
 
Business Strategy
 
Our mission is to improve the quality of patient care and the productivity of healthcare delivery through the development and advocacy of less-invasive medical devices and procedures. We believe that the pursuit of this mission will likewise enhance shareholder value.
 
We intend to accomplish our mission through the continuing refinement of existing products and procedures and the investigation and development of new technologies that can reduce risk, trauma, cost, procedure time and the need for aftercare. Our approach to innovation combines internally developed products and technologies with those we obtained externally through strategic acquisitions and alliances. Building relationships with development-stage companies and inventors allows us to deepen our current franchises as well as expand into complementary businesses.
 
Key elements of our overall business strategy include the following:
 
Product Quality
 
Our commitment to quality and the success of our quality objectives are designed to build customer trust and loyalty. This commitment to provide quality products to our customers runs throughout our organization and is one of our most critical business objectives. During 2005, in order to strengthen our quality controls, we established Project Horizon, a cross-functional initiative to further improve and harmonize our overall quality processes and systems. Under Project Horizon, we have made an overarching effort to elevate quality thinking in all that we do. To that end, in 2006, we have made significant improvements to our quality systems, including in the areas of field action decision-making, corrective and preventative actions, management controls, process validations and complaint management systems. In 2006, our Board of Directors created a Compliance and Quality Committee to monitor our compliance and quality initiatives. Our quality policy, applicable to all employees, is “I improve the quality of patient care and all things Boston Scientific.”
 
Innovation
 
We are committed to harnessing technological innovation through a mixture of tactical and strategic initiatives that are designed to offer sustainable growth in the near and long term. Combining internally developed products and technologies with those obtained through acquisitions and alliances allows us to focus on and deliver products currently in our own research and development pipeline as well as to strengthen our technology portfolio by accessing third-party technologies.
 
Clinical Excellence
 
Our commitment to innovation is further demonstrated by our clinical capabilities. Our clinical groups focus on driving innovative therapies that can transform the practice of medicine. Our clinical teams are organized by therapeutic specialty to better support our research and development pipeline and marketing and sales efforts. During 2006, our clinical organizations planned, initiated and conducted an expanding series of focused clinical trials that support regulatory and reimbursement requirements and demonstrate the safe and effective clinical performance of critical products and technologies. In October, we announced positive results from our TAXUS OLYMPIA registry, supporting the safety and efficacy of our TAXUS Liberté stent system in real-world patient subsets considered high risk for bare-metal stenting, including diabetics, small vessels and long lesions. We are currently enrolling patients in our SYNTAX clinical trial, which will compare the performance of drug-eluting stents with cardiac surgery in the most complex subsets: those with coronary artery disease in all three coronary arteries, in the left main coronary artery, or both.
 
Product Diversity
 
We offer products in numerous product categories, which are used by physicians throughout the world in a broad range of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. The
 
breadth and diversity of our product lines permit medical specialists and purchasing organizations to satisfy many of their less-invasive medical device requirements from a single source.
 
Operational Excellence
 
We are focused on continuously improving our supply chain effectiveness, strengthening our manufacturing processes and optimizing our plant network in order to increase operational efficiencies within our organization. By shifting global manufacturing along product lines, we are able to leverage our existing resources and concentrate on new product development, including the enhancement of existing products and their commercial launch. We are committing additional resources to support our growth and implementing new systems designed to provide improved quality and reliability, service, greater efficiency and lower supply chain costs. We have substantially increased our focus on process controls and validations, supplier controls, distribution controls and providing our operations teams with the training and tools necessary to drive continuous improvement in product quality. In 2007, we are also focused on examining our operations and general business activities to identify cost-improvement opportunities in order to enhance our operational effectiveness.
 
Focused Marketing
 
We consistently strive to understand and exceed the expectations of our customers. Each of our business groups maintains dedicated sales forces and marketing teams focusing on physicians who specialize in the diagnosis and treatment of different medical conditions. We believe that this focused disease state management enables us to develop highly knowledgeable and dedicated sales representatives and to foster close professional relationships with physicians. In recent years, we have expanded our direct sales presence worldwide so as to be in a position to take advantage of expanding market opportunities.
 
Active Participation in the Medical Community
 
We believe that we have excellent working relationships with physicians and others in the medical industry, which enable us to gain a detailed understanding of new therapeutic and diagnostic alternatives and to respond quickly to the changing needs of physicians and patients. Active participation in the medical community contributes to physician understanding and adoption of less-invasive techniques and the expansion of these techniques into new therapeutic and diagnostic areas.
 
Corporate Culture
 
We believe that success and leadership evolve from a motivating corporate culture that rewards achievement, respects and values individual employees and customers, and focuses on quality, patient care, integrity, technology and service. This high performance culture has embraced an intense increase in quality focus, and now places quality at the top of its priorities. We believe that our success is attributable in large part to the high caliber of our employees and our commitment to respecting the values on which our success has been based.
 
Research and Development
 
Our investment in research and development is critical to drive our future growth. We have directed our development efforts toward regulatory compliance and innovative technologies designed to expand current markets or enter new markets. Enhancements to existing products that are typically originated and developed within our research and development, manufacturing and marketing operations contribute to each year’s sales growth. We believe that streamlining,
 
prioritizing and coordinating our technology pipeline and new product development activities are essential to our ability to stimulate growth and maintain leadership positions in our markets. Our approach to new product design and development is through focused, cross-functional teams. We believe that our formal process for technology and product development aids in our ability to offer innovative and manufacturable products in a consistent and timely manner. Involvement of the research and development, clinical, quality, regulatory, manufacturing and marketing teams early in the process is the cornerstone of our product development cycle. This collaboration allows these teams to concentrate resources on the most viable and game-changing new products and technologies and get them to market in a timely manner. In addition to internal development, we work with hundreds of leading research institutions, universities and clinicians around the world to develop, evaluate and clinically test our products.
 
We believe our future success will depend upon the strength of these development efforts. In 2006, we expended over $1.0 billion on research and development, representing approximately 13 percent of our 2006 net sales. Our investment in research and development reflects:
 
·  
spending on new product development programs;
 
·  
regulatory compliance and clinical research, particularly relating to our next-generation stent and CRM platforms and other development programs acquired in connection with our business combinations; and
 
·  
sustaining engineering efforts which factor customer (or “post market”) feedback into continuous improvement efforts for currently marketed products.
 
Strategic Initiatives
 
Since 1995, we have undertaken a strategic acquisition program to assemble the lines of business necessary to achieve the critical mass that allows us to continue to be a leader in the medical device industry. In 2006, in addition to our acquisition of Guidant, we invested approximately $500   million in approximately 25 new and existing strategic alliances and acquisitions. These initiatives are intended to further expand our product offerings by adding new or complementary technologies to our already diverse technology portfolio.
 
Many of our alliances involve complex arrangements with third parties and include, in many instances, the option to purchase these companies at pre-established future dates, generally upon the attainment of performance, regulatory and/or revenue milestones. These arrangements allow us to evaluate new technologies prior to acquiring them.
 
We expect that we will continue to focus selectively on strategic acquisitions and alliances in order to provide new products and technology platforms to our customers, including making additional investments in several of our existing strategic relationships.
 
Products
 
Our products are principally offered for sale by three dedicated business groups—Cardiovascular (which includes our interventional cardiology, cardiac rhythm management and cardiovascular divisions), Endosurgery (which includes our oncology, endoscopy and urology/gynecology divisions) and Neuromodulation (which includes our cochlear and pain management divisions). Our Cardiovascular organization focuses on products and technologies for use in interventional cardiology, cardiac rhythm management, peripheral interventions, cardiac surgery, vascular surgery, electrophysiology and neurovascular procedures. Our Endosurgery organization focuses
 
on products and technologies for use in oncology, endoscopy, urology and gynecology procedures. Our Neuromodulation organization currently focuses on the treatment of auditory disorders and chronic pain. During 2006, approximately 80 percent of our net sales were derived from our Cardiovascular business groups, approximately 17 percent from our Endosurgery business groups and approximately 3 percent from our Neuromodulation business group.
 
The following section describes some of our Cardiovascular, Endosurgery and Neuromodulation offerings:
 
Cardiovascular
 
Coronary Stent Business
 
Drug-Eluting Stents
 
We market our TAXUS Express 2 paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent system principally in the U.S., and we expect to launch the TAXUS Express 2 stent system in Japan during the second half of 2007, subject to regulatory approval. In January 2007, the FDA approved extending the shelf life of our TAXUS coronary stent system in the U.S. from 12 to 18 months. We also market our second-generation coronary stent, the TAXUS® Liberté™ coronary stent system, in our European and Inter-Continental markets. We also expect to launch the TAXUS Liberté coronary stent system in the U.S., subject to regulatory approval.
 
During the fourth quarter of 2006, we launched our PROMUS everolimus-eluting coronary stent system in certain European countries, expanding our drug-eluting stent portfolio to include two distinct drug platforms. We expect to launch the PROMUS stent system in certain Inter-Continental countries during the second quarter of 2007 and in the U.S. in 2008, subject to regulatory approval. We also expect to launch an internally manufactured next-generation everolimus-based stent system in Europe in 2010 and in the U.S. in 2011. In addition, we have commenced regulatory filings to begin clinical trials for our next-generation paclitaxel-eluting stent beyond TAXUS Liberté stent system, the TAXUS® Element™ coronary stent system, which we expect to launch in Europe in 2009 and in the U.S. in 2010, subject to regulatory approval.
 
Bare-Metal Stents
 
We offer our Liberté coronary stent system globally. The Liberté coronary stent system serves as the platform for our second-generation paclitaxel-eluting stent system, the TAXUS Liberté coronary stent system. The Liberté bare-metal coronary stent is designed to enhance deliverability and conformability, particularly in challenging lesions.
 
Cardiac Surgery
 
Our acquisition of Guidant also enabled us to enter the cardiac surgery business. Cardiac surgery devices are used to perform endoscopic vessel harvesting, cardiac surgical ablation and less-invasive coronary artery by-pass surgery.
 
Coronary Revascularization
 
We market a broad line of products used to treat patients with atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis, a principal cause of coronary artery obstructive disease, is characterized by a thickening of the walls of the coronary arteries and a narrowing of arterial lumens (openings) caused by the progressive development of deposits of plaque. The majority of our products in this market are used in percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and include bare-metal and drug-
 
eluting stents, such as the TAXUS® paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent systems, PTCA balloon catheters, such as the Maverick® balloon catheter, the Cutting Balloon® microsurgical dilatation device, rotational atherectomy systems, guide wires, guide catheters and diagnostic catheters. We also market a broad line of fluid delivery sets, pressure monitoring systems, custom kits and accessories that enable the injection of contrast and saline or otherwise facilitate cardiovascular procedures.
 
Intraluminal Ultrasound Imaging
 
We market a family of intraluminal catheter-directed ultrasound imaging catheters and systems for use in coronary arteries and heart chambers as well as certain peripheral systems. In July 2006, we launched the new iLab Ultrasound Imaging System in the U.S. This new system enhances the diagnosis and treatment of blocked vessels and heart disorders.
 
Embolic Protection
 
 
Peripheral Interventions
 
We also sell various products designed to treat patients with peripheral disease (disease which appears in blood vessels other than in the heart and in biliary strictures), including a broad line of medical devices used in percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and peripheral vascular stenting. Our peripheral product line includes vascular access products, balloon catheters, stents and peripheral vascular catheters, wires and accessories. We also market the PolarCath peripheral dilatation system used in CryoPlasty ® Therapy®, an innovative approach to the treatment of peripheral artery disease in the lower extremities. We launched in June 2006 the Sterling™ Balloon dilatation catheter, a dilatation catheter with several differentiating features, including the only pre- and post-stent dilatation indication for carotid artery stenting.
 
In January 2007, we completed the acquisition of EndoTex Interventional Systems, Inc., a development stage medical device company, and now market the NexStent® Carotid Stent System, a laser-cut, nitinol stent with a rolled sheet design that enables one stent size to adapt to multiple diameters in tapered or non-tapered vessel configurations.
 
Neurovascular Intervention
 
We market a line of coils (coated and uncoated), micro-delivery stents, micro-guidewires, micro-catheters, guiding catheters and embolics to neuroradiologists and neurosurgeons to treat diseases of the neurovascular system. We market the GDC® Coils (Guglielmi Detachable Coil) and Matrix® systems to treat brain aneurysms. We also offer the Wingspan™ Stent System with Gateway™ PTA Balloon Catheter under a Humanitarian Device Exemption (HDE) approval granted by the FDA. The Wingspan Stent System is designed to treat atherosclerotic lesions or accumulated plaque in brain arteries. Designed for the brain’s fragile vessels, the Wingspan Stent System is a self-expanding, nitinol stent sheathed in a delivery system that enables it to
 
reach and open narrowed arteries in the brain. The Wingspan Stent System is currently the only device available in the U.S. for the treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) and is indicated for improving cerebral artery lumen diameter in patients with ICAD who are unresponsive to medical therapy.
 
Vascular Surgery
 
We design abdominal, thoracic and peripheral vascular grafts for the treatment of aortic aneurysms and dissections, peripheral vascular occlusive diseases and dialysis access. Our grafts and fabrics are used for peripheral vascular and cardiovascular indications.
 
Electrophysiology
 
We offer medical devices for the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac conditions called arrhythmias (abnormal heartbeats). Included in our product offerings are RF generators, mapping systems, intracardiac ultrasound and steerable ablation catheters, as well as a line of diagnostic catheters and associated accessories. We also market the Chilli II™ cooled ablation catheter, the first bidirectional cooled-tip catheter available in the U.S. In 2006, we launched our next-generation line of RF generators, the MAESTRO 3000 ® Cardiac Ablation System.
 
Cardiac Rhythm Management
 
Through our acquisition of Guidant, we now offer a variety of implantable devices that can monitor the heart and deliver electricity to treat cardiac rhythm abnormalities, including tachycardia (abnormally fast or chaotic heart rhythms), heart failure and bradycardia (slow or irregular heart rhythms).
 
Our product offerings include:
 
·  
the VITALITY® family of defibrillators which provide a broad range of atrial (upper chambers of the heart) and ventricular (lower chambers) therapies to serve patients’ various needs;
 
·  
cardiac resynchronization therapy devices, like those in our CONTAK RENEWAL® family of devices, which can help reduce mortality and hospitalization;
 
·  
the INSIGNIA® family of pacemakers which offer proprietary blended sensor technology designed to measure patient workload through respiration and motion, providing rate response based on the patient’s activity; and
 
·  
the LATITUDE® Patient Management System, comprised of the LATITUDE Communicator, LATITUDE Website, CONTAK RENEWAL 3RF CRT-D and ZOOM® LATITUDE Programmer, which enables a physician or technician to monitor a patient’s device status and health data from home.
 
In October 2006, the FDA approved our LATITUDE® Patient Management System to be used for remote monitoring in certain existing ICD systems and cardiac resynchronization defibrillators. We are in the process of making this technology available to many of our current CRM patients.
 
The Frontier CRM technology is our next-generation CRM pulse generator platform that will incorporate new components and software and will be leveraged across all CRM product lines to
 
treat electrical dysfunction in the heart. We expect to launch various products based on the Frontier  CRM technology in the U.S. over the next 36 months, subject to regulatory approval.
 
Endosurgery
 
Esophageal, Gastric and Duodenal (Small Intestine) Intervention
 
We market a broad range of products to diagnose, treat and palliate a variety of gastrointestinal diseases and conditions, including those affecting the esophagus, stomach and colon. Common disease states include esophagitis, portal hypertension, peptic ulcers and esophageal cancer. Our products in this area include disposable single and multiple biopsy forceps, balloon dilatation catheters, hemostasis catheters and enteral feeding devices. We also market a family of esophageal stents designed to offer improved dilatation force and greater resistance to tumor in-growth. We launched the Radial Jaw® 4 Single-Use Biopsy Forceps, the newest version of our Radial Jaw Single-Use Biopsy Forceps, in July 2006. The Radial Jaw 4 biopsy forceps are designed to enable collection of large high-quality tissue specimens without the need to use large channel therapeutic endoscopes.
 
Colorectal Intervention
 
We market a line of hemostatic catheters, polypectomy snares, biopsy forceps, enteral stents and dilatation catheters for the diagnosis and treatment of polyps, inflammatory bowel disease, diverticulitis and colon cancer.
 
Pancreatico-Biliary Intervention
 
We sell a variety of products to diagnose, treat and palliate benign and malignant strictures of the pancreatico-biliary system (the gall bladder, common bile duct, hepatic duct, pancreatic duct and the pancreas) and to remove stones found in the common bile duct. Our products include diagnostic catheters used with contrast media, balloon dilatation catheters and sphincterotomes. We also market self-expanding metal and temporary biliary stents for palliation and drainage of the common bile duct.   In 2006, we introduced the Spyglass™ Direct Visualization System for direct imaging of the bile duct system.  This is the first single operator cholangioscopy device that offers clinicians a direct visualization of the bile duct system and includes supporting devices for tissue acquisition, stone retrieval and lithotripsy.
 
Pulmonary Intervention
 
We market devices to diagnose, treat and palliate diseases of the pulmonary system. The major devices include pulmonary biopsy forceps, transbronchial aspiration needles, cytology brushes and tracheobronchial stents used to dilate strictures or for tumor management.
 
Urinary Tract Intervention and Bladder Disease
 
We sell a variety of products designed primarily to treat patients with urinary stone disease, including ureteral dilatation balloons used to dilate strictures or openings for scope access; stone baskets used to manipulate or remove the stone; intracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy devices and holmium laser systems used to disintegrate stones; ureteral stents implanted temporarily in the urinary tract to provide short-term or long-term drainage; and a wide variety of guidewires used to gain access to a specific site. We have also developed other devices to diagnose and treat bladder cancer and bladder obstruction.
 
Prostate Intervention
 
For the treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH), we currently market electro-surgical resection devices designed to resect large diseased tissue sites. We also market disposable needle biopsy devices, designed to take core prostate biopsy samples. In addition, we distribute and market the Prolieve thermodilatation system, a transurethral microwave thermotherapy system, and the DuoTome™ SideLite™ holmium laser treatment system for treatment of symptoms associated with BPH.
 
Pelvic Floor Reconstruction and Urinary Incontinence
 
We market a line of less-invasive devices to treat female pelvic floor conditions in the area of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. These devices include a full line of mid-urethral sling products, sling materials, graft materials, suturing devices and injectables. In May 2006, we were granted exclusive U.S. distribution rights to the Coaptite® Injectable Implant, a next-generation bulking agent, for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.    
 
Gynecology
 
We also market other products in the area of women’s health. Our Hydro ThermAblator® System (HTA® system) offers a less-invasive technology for the treatment of excessive uterine bleeding by ablating the lining of the uterus, the tissue responsible for menstrual bleeding.
 
Oncology
 
We market a broad line of products designed to treat, diagnose and palliate various forms of benign and malignant tumors. Our current suite of products includes microcatheters, embolic agents and coils designed to restrict blood supply to targeted sites. In addition, we market radiofrequency-based therapeutic devices for the ablation of various forms of soft tissue lesions (tumors). Also included in the oncology portfolio is a complete line of venous access products which are marketed for infusion therapy.
 
Neuromodulation
 
Cochlear Implants
 
We develop and market in the U.S., Europe and Japan the HiResolution® 90K Cochlear Implant System to restore hearing to the profoundly deaf. The technology consists of an external sound processor, which captures and processes sound information from the environment and transmits the digital information through the skin to the implant. The implant delivers digital pulses of electrical current to precise locations on the auditory nerve, which the brain perceives as sound. In September 2006, our next-generation cochlear implant technology, the Harmony HiResolution Bionic Ear System was approved by the FDA. We commercially launched this product on a limited basis in late 2006 and anticipate a full launch in early 2007.
 
Pain Management
 
We market the Precision® Spinal Cord Stimulation System for the treatment of chronic pain of the lower back and legs. This system delivers advanced pain management by applying a small electrical signal to mask pain signals traveling from the spinal cord to the brain. The Precision System utilizes a rechargeable battery and features a patient-directed fitting system for fast and effective programming. The Precision System is also being assessed for use in treating migraine pain.
 
 
Dedicated sales forces of approximately 2,400 individuals in approximately 45 countries internationally and over 3,400 individuals in the U.S. marketed our products worldwide as of December 31, 2006. Sales in countries where we have direct sales organizations accounted for approximately 94 percent of our net sales during 2006. A network of distributors and dealers who offer our products in more than 50 countries worldwide accounts for our remaining sales. We also have a dedicated corporate sales organization in the U.S. focused principally on selling to major buying groups and integrated healthcare networks.
 
In 2006, we sold our products to over 10,000 hospitals, clinics, out-patient facilities and medical offices. We are not dependent on any single institution and no single institution accounted for more than 10 percent of our net sales in 2006. Large group purchasing organizations, hospital networks and other buying groups have, however, become increasingly important to our business and represent a substantial portion of our U.S. net sales.
 
We also distribute certain products for third parties, including an introducer sheath and certain guidewires, as well as BPH devices, various graft materials, and pneumatic and laser lithotripters for use in connection with urology and gynecology procedures. Our agreement to distribute certain guidewire and sheath products expired during the first quarter of 2006. While we have identified replacements for these products, the sales level associated with the replacement products has been, as expected, less than that of our previously distributed products. Together, these distributed products represented less than two percent of our 2006 net sales. Leveraging our sales and marketing strength, we expect to continue to seek new opportunities for distributing complementary products as well as new technologies.
 
International Operations
 
Internationally, through 2006, we operated through three business units divided among the geographic regions of Europe, Japan and Inter-Continental. Maintaining and expanding our international presence is an important component of our long-term growth plan. Through our international presence, we seek to increase net sales and market share, leverage relationships with leading physicians and their clinical research programs, accelerate the time to bring new products to market and gain access to worldwide technological developments that may be implemented across our product lines. After our acquisition of Guidant, we integrated Guidant’s international sales operations into our geographic regions. Consistent with our geographic focus, the Guidant CRM business became a business unit within each country organization across Europe, Japan and Inter-Continental. In the first quarter of 2007, we began operating through four international business units: Europe, Asia Pacific/Japan, Inter-Continental and Distributor Management.
 
International sales accounted for approximately 38 percent of our net sales in 2006. Net sales and operating income attributable to significant geographic areas are presented in Note N—Segment Reporting to our 2006 consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
 
In recent years, we have expanded our direct sales presence worldwide so as to be in a position to take advantage of expanding market opportunities. As of December 31, 2006, we had direct marketing and sales operations in approximately 45 countries internationally. We believe that we will continue to leverage our infrastructure in markets where commercially appropriate and to use third parties in those markets where it is not economical or strategic to establish a direct presence.
 
We have five international manufacturing facilities in Ireland, one in Costa Rica and one in Puerto Rico. Presently, approximately 33 percent of our products sold worldwide are manufactured at these facilities. We also maintain an international research and development
 
facility in Ireland, a training facility in Tokyo, Japan, and a training and research and development center in Miyazaki, Japan. We currently share a training facility in Brussels, Belgium with Abbott.
 
Manufacturing and Raw Materials
 
We design and manufacture the majority of our products in technology centers around the world. Many components used in the manufacture of our products are readily fabricated from commonly available raw materials or off-the-shelf items available from multiple supply sources. Certain items are custom made for us to meet our specifications. We believe that in most cases, redundant capacity exists at our suppliers and that alternative sources of supply are available or could be developed within a reasonable period of time. We also have an ongoing program to identify single-source components and to develop alternative back-up supplies. However, in certain cases, we may not be able to quickly establish additional or replacement suppliers for specific components or materials, largely due to the regulatory approval system and the complex nature of the manufacturing processes employed by us and many suppliers. A reduction or interruption in supply, an inability to develop and validate alternative sources if required, or a significant increase in the price of raw materials or components could adversely affect our operations and financial condition, particularly materials or components related to our TAXUS® and PROMUS™ drug-eluting coronary stent systems and our CRM products.
 
Quality Assurance
 
On January 26, 2006, legacy Boston Scientific received a corporate warning letter from the FDA notifying us of serious regulatory problems at three of our facilities and advising us that our corporate-wide corrective action plan relating to three site-specific warning letters issued to us in 2005 was inadequate. As stated in this FDA warning letter, the FDA may not grant our requests for exportation certificates to foreign governments or approve pre-market approval (PMA) applications for class III devices to which the quality control or current good manufacturing practices deficiencies described in the letter are reasonably related until the deficiencies have been corrected. During 2005, in order to strengthen our corporate-wide quality controls, we established Project Horizon a corporate-wide cross-functional initiative to improve and harmonize our overall quality processes and systems. As part of Project Horizon, we have made modifications to our process validation and complaint management systems. Project Horizon resulted in the reallocation of significant internal engineering and management resources to quality initiatives, as well as incremental spending, which has resulted in adjustments to product launch schedules of certain products and the decision to discontinue certain other product lines over time.

In 2006, our Board of Directors created a Compliance and Quality Committee to monitor our compliance and quality initiatives. We believe we have identified solutions to the quality issues cited by the FDA, and we continue to make progress in transitioning our organization to implement those solutions. We communicate frequently and meet regularly with the FDA to apprise them of our progress. The FDA has communicated the need for us to complete substantially our remediation efforts before they will re-inspect our facilities. We have engaged a third party to audit our enhanced quality systems in order to assess our Company-wide compliance prior to re-inspection by the FDA. We believe we will be ready for third-party audit in the second quarter of 2007.

On December 23, 2005, Guidant received an FDA warning letter citing certain deficiencies with respect to its manufacturing quality systems and record keeping procedures in its CRM facility in St. Paul, Minnesota. This FDA warning letter followed an inspection by the FDA that was completed on September 1, 2005 and cited a number of observations. Guidant received a follow-up letter from the FDA dated January 5, 2006. As stated in this follow-up letter, until we have corrected the
 
identified deficiencies, the FDA may not grant requests for exportation certificates to foreign governments or approve PMA applications for class III devices to which the deficiencies described are reasonably related. The FDA conducted a further inspection of the CRM facility between December 15, 2005 and February 9, 2006 and made one additional inspectional observation.  The FDA has concluded its reinspection of our CRM facilities. While we believe this reinspection went well, we may be required to take additional actions in order to comply with any FDA observations that we may receive.
 
We are committed to providing high quality products to our customers. To meet this commitment, we are implementing updated quality systems and concepts throughout our organization. Our quality system starts with the initial product specification and continues through the design of the product, component specification process and the manufacturing, sales and servicing of the product. Our quality system is designed to build in quality and process control and to utilize continuous improvement concepts throughout the product life. These systems are designed to enable us to satisfy the quality system regulations of the FDA with respect to products sold in the U.S. Many of our operations are certified under ISO 9001, ISO 9002, ISO 13485, ISO 13488, EN 46001 and EN 46002 international quality system standards. ISO 9002 requires, among other items, an implemented quality system that applies to component quality, supplier control and manufacturing operations. In addition, ISO 9001 and EN 46001 require an implemented quality system that applies to product design. These certifications can be obtained only after a complete audit of a company’s quality system by an independent outside auditor. Maintenance of these certifications requires that these facilities undergo periodic re-examination.
 
We maintain an ongoing initiative to seek ISO 14001 certification at our plants around the world. ISO 14001, the environmental management system standard in the ISO 14000 series, provides a voluntary framework to identify key environmental aspects associated with our businesses. We engage in continuous environmental performance improvement around these aspects. At present, nine of our manufacturing and distribution facilities have attained ISO 14001 certification. This initiative is expected to continue until each of our manufacturing facilities, including those we acquire, becomes certified.
 
Competition
 
We encounter significant competition across our product lines and in each market in which our products are sold from various companies, some of which may have greater financial and marketing resources than we do. Our primary competitors have historically included Johnson & Johnson (including its subsidiary, Cordis Corporation) and Medtronic, Inc. (including its subsidiary, Medtronic AVE, Inc.), as well as a wide range of companies which sell a single or limited number of competitive products or participate only in a specific market segment. Since we acquired Guidant, Abbott Laboratories has become a competitor of ours in the interventional cardiology market and St. Jude Medical, Inc. has become a competitor of ours in the CRM market, in addition to the Neuromodulation market. We also face competition from non-medical device companies, such as pharmaceutical companies, which may offer alternative therapies for disease states intended to be treated using our products.
 
We believe that our products compete primarily on the basis of their ability to safely and effectively perform diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in a less-invasive manner, including ease of use, reliability and physician familiarity. In the current environment of managed care, economically motivated buyers, consolidation among healthcare providers, increased competition and declining reimbursement rates, we have also increasingly been required to compete on the basis of price, value, reliability and efficiency. We believe that our continued competitive success will depend upon our ability to create or acquire scientifically advanced technology, apply our
 
technology cost-effectively and with superior quality across product lines and markets, develop or acquire proprietary products, attract and retain skilled development personnel, obtain patent or other protection for our products, obtain required regulatory and reimbursement approvals, continually enhance our quality systems, manufacture and successfully market our products either directly or through outside parties and supply sufficient inventory to meet customer demand.
 
 
The medical devices that we manufacture and market are subject to regulation by numerous regulatory bodies, including the FDA and comparable international regulatory agencies. These agencies require manufacturers of medical devices to comply with applicable laws and regulations governing the development, testing, manufacturing, labeling, marketing and distribution of medical devices. Devices are generally subject to varying levels of regulatory control, the most comprehensive of which requires that a clinical evaluation program be conducted before a device receives approval for commercial distribution.
 
In the U.S., permission to distribute a new device generally can be met in one of two ways. The first process requires that a pre-market notification (a 510(k) Submission) be made to the FDA to demonstrate that the device is as safe and effective as, or substantially equivalent to, a legally marketed device that is not subject to pre-market approval (PMA) (i.e., the “predicate” device). An appropriate predicate device for a pre-market notification is one that (i) was legally marketed prior to May 28, 1976, (ii) was approved under a PMA but then subsequently reclassified from class III to class II or I, or (iii) has been found to be substantially equivalent and cleared for commercial distribution under a 510(k) Submission. Applicants must submit descriptive data and, when necessary, performance data to establish that the device is substantially equivalent to a predicate device. In some instances, data from human clinical trials must also be submitted in support of a 510(k) Submission. If so, these data must be collected in a manner that conforms to the applicable Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) regulations. The FDA must issue an order finding substantial equivalence before commercial distribution can occur. Changes to existing devices covered by a 510(k) Submission which do not raise new questions of safety or effectiveness can generally be made by us without additional 510(k) Submissions. More significant changes, such as new designs or materials, may require a separate 510(k) with data to support that the modified device remains substantially equivalent.
 
The second process requires that an application for PMA be made to the FDA to demonstrate that the device is safe and effective for its intended use as manufactured. This approval process applies to certain class III devices. In this case, two steps of FDA approval are generally required before marketing in the U.S. can begin. First, we must comply with the applicable IDE regulations in connection with any human clinical investigation of the device in the U.S. Second, the FDA must review our PMA application which contains, among other things, clinical information acquired under the IDE. The FDA will approve the PMA application if it finds that there is a reasonable assurance that the device is safe and effective for its intended purpose.
 
The FDA can ban certain medical devices; detain or seize adulterated or misbranded medical devices; order repair, replacement or refund of these devices; and require notification of health professionals and others with regard to medical devices that present unreasonable risks of substantial harm to the public health. The FDA may also enjoin and restrain certain violations of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the Safe Medical Devices Act pertaining to medical devices, or initiate action for criminal prosecution of such violations. International sales of medical devices manufactured in the U.S. that are not approved by the FDA for use in the U.S., or are banned or deviate from lawful performance standards, are subject to FDA export
 
requirements. Exported devices are subject to the regulatory requirements of each country to which the device is exported. Some countries do not have medical device regulations, but in most foreign countries medical devices are regulated. Frequently, regulatory approval may first be obtained in a foreign country prior to application in the U.S. to take advantage of differing regulatory requirements. Most countries outside of the United States require that product approvals be recertified on a regular basis, generally every five years. The recertification process requires that we evaluate any device changes and any new regulations or standards relevant to the device and conduct appropriate testing to document continued compliance. Where recertification applications are required, they must be approved in order to continue to sell our products in those countries.
 
In the European Union, we are required to comply with the Medical Devices Directive and obtain CE Mark certification in order to market medical devices. The CE Mark certification, granted following approval from an independent Notified Body, is an international symbol of adherence to quality assurance standards and compliance with applicable European Medical Devices Directives. We also comply with all other foreign regulations such as the requirement that we obtain Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare approval before we can launch new products in Japan, including our TAXUS® Express 2 coronary stent system. The time required to obtain these foreign approvals to market our products may be longer or shorter than that required in the U.S., and requirements for such approval may differ from those required by the FDA.
 
We are also subject to various environmental laws, directives and regulations both in the U.S. and abroad. Our operations, like those of other medical device companies, involve the use of substances regulated under environmental laws, primarily in manufacturing and sterilization processes. We believe that compliance with environmental laws will not have a material impact on our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position. Given the scope and nature of these laws, however, there can be no assurance that environmental laws will not have a material impact on our results of operations. We assess potential environmental contingent liabilities on a quarterly basis. At present, we are not aware of any such liabilities which would have a material impact on our business. We are also certified with respect to the enhanced environmental FTSE4Good criteria and are a constituent member of the London Stock Exchange s FTSE4Good Index, which recognizes companies that meet certain corporate responsibility standards.
 
Third-Party Coverage and Reimbursement
 
Our products are purchased by hospitals, doctors and other healthcare providers who are reimbursed by third-party payors, such as governmental programs (e.g., Medicare and Medicaid), private insurance plans and managed care programs, for the healthcare services provided to their patients. Third-party payors may provide or deny coverage for certain technologies and associated procedures based on assessment criteria as determined by the third-party payor. Reimbursement by third-party payors for these services is based on a wide range of methodologies that may reflect the services’ assessed resource costs, clinical outcomes and economic value. These reimbursement methodologies confer different, and often conflicting, levels of financial risk and incentives to healthcare providers and patients, and these methodologies are subject to frequent refinements. Third-party payors are also increasingly adjusting reimbursement rates and challenging the prices charged for medical products and services. There can be no assurance that our products will be automatically covered by third-party payors, that reimbursement will be available or, if available, that the third-party payors’ coverage policies will not adversely affect our ability to sell our products profitably.
 
Initiatives to limit the growth of healthcare costs, including price regulation, are also underway in many countries in which we do business. Implementation of cost containment initiatives and healthcare reforms in significant markets such as Japan, Europe and other international markets may limit the
 
price of, or the level at which reimbursement is provided for, our products and may influence a physician’s selection of products used to treat patients.
 
Proprietary Rights and Patent Litigation
 
We rely on a combination of patents, trademarks, trade secrets and non-disclosure agreements to protect our intellectual property. We generally file patent applications in the U.S. and foreign countries where patent protection for our technology is appropriate and available. We hold approximately 6,000 U.S. patents (many of which have foreign counterparts) and have more than 8,600 patent applications pending worldwide that cover various aspects of our technology. In addition, we hold exclusive and non-exclusive licenses to a variety of third-party technologies covered by patents and patent applications. There can be no assurance that pending patent applications will result in issued patents, that patents issued to or licensed by us will not be challenged or circumvented by competitors, or that such patents will be found to be valid or sufficiently broad to protect our technology or to provide us with a competitive advantage.
 
We rely on non-disclosure and non-competition agreements with employees, consultants and other parties to protect, in part, trade secrets and other proprietary technology. There can be no assurance that these agreements will not be breached, that we will have adequate remedies for any breach, that others will not independently develop equivalent proprietary information or that third parties will not otherwise gain access to our trade secrets and proprietary knowledge.
 
There has been substantial litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property rights in the medical device industry, particularly in the areas in which we compete. We have defended, and will continue to defend, ourself against claims and legal actions alleging infringement of the patent rights of others. Adverse determinations in any patent litigation could subject us to significant liabilities to third parties, require us to seek licenses from third parties, and, if licenses are not available, prevent us from manufacturing, selling or using certain of our products, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
 
Additionally, we may find it necessary to initiate litigation to enforce our patent rights, to protect our trade secrets or know-how and to determine the scope and validity of the proprietary rights of others. Patent litigation can be costly and time-consuming, and there can be no assurance that our litigation expenses will not be significant in the future or that the outcome of litigation will be favorable to us. Accordingly, we may seek to settle some or all of our pending litigation. Settlement may include cross-licensing of the patents which are the subject of the litigation as well as our other intellectual property and may involve monetary payments to or from third parties.
 
 
Risk Management
 
The testing, marketing and sale of human healthcare products entails an inherent risk of product liability claims. We are involved in various lawsuits arising in the normal course of business from product liability and securities claims. We are substantially self-insured with respect to general, product liability and securities claims. As a result of the economic factors currently impacting the insurance industry, meaningful liability insurance coverage became unavailable due to its economically prohibitive cost.

In connection with our acquisition of Guidant, the number of product liability claims and other legal proceedings filed against us, including private securities litigation and shareholder derivative suits, significantly increased. Product liability and securities claims against us may be asserted in the future related to unknown events at the present time. The absence of significant third-party insurance coverage increases our potential exposure to unanticipated claims or adverse decisions. Product liability claims, product recalls, securities litigation and other litigation in the future, regardless of their outcome, could have a material adverse effect on our business. We believe that our risk management practices, including limited insurance coverage, are reasonably adequate to protect against anticipated general, product liability and securities litigation losses. However, unanticipated catastrophic losses could have a material adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations and liquidity.
 
Employees
 
As of December 31, 2006, we had approximately 28,600 employees, including approximately 14,300 in operations, 2,000 in administration, 4,600 in clinical, regulatory and research and development and 7,700 in selling, marketing, distribution and related administrative support. Of these employees, approximately 14,500 were employed outside the U.S., approximately 6,200 of which are included in the Operations function. We believe that the continued success of our business will depend, in part, on our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel.
 
Seasonality
 
Our worldwide sales do not reflect any significant degree of seasonality; however, customer purchases have been lighter in the third quarter of prior years than in other quarters. This reflects, among other factors, lower demand during summer months, particularly in European countries.
 
Available Information
 
Copies of our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are available free of charge on our website (www.bostonscientific.com) as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file the material with or furnish it to the SEC. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Conduct, which applies to all of our directors, officers and employees, including our Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Controller, are also available on our website (along with any amendments to those documents). Any amendments to or waivers for executive officers or directors of our Code of Conduct will be disclosed on our website promptly after the date of any such amendment or waiver. Printed copies of these posted materials are also available free of charge to shareholders who request them in writing from Investor Relations, One Boston Scientific Place, Natick, MA 01760-1537. Information on our website or connected to our website is not incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K.
 
Cautionary Statement for Purposes of the Safe Harbor Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
 
Certain statements that we may make from time to time, including statements contained in this report and information incorporated by reference into this report, constitute “forward-looking statements.” Forward-looking statements may be identified by words like “anticipate,” “expect,” “project,” “believe,” “plan,” “estimate,” “intend” and similar words used in connection with, among other things, discussions of our financial performance, growth strategy, regulatory
 
approvals, product development or new product launches, market position, sales efforts, intellectual property matters or acquisitions and divestitures. These forward-looking statements are based on our beliefs, assumptions and estimates using information available to us at the time and are not intended to be guarantees of future events or performance. If our underlying assumptions turn out to be incorrect, or if certain risks or uncertainties materialize, actual results could vary materially from the expectations and projections expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements. As a result, investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any of our forward-looking statements.
 
We do not intend to update the forward-looking statements below or the risk factors described in Item 1A under the heading “Risk Factors” even if new information becomes available or other events occur in the future. We have identified these forward-looking statements below and the risk factors described in Item 1A under the heading “Risk Factors” in order to take advantage of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Certain factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements are contained below and in the risk factors described in Item 1A under the heading “Risk Factors.”
 
CRM Business
 
·  
The recovery of the CRM market to historical growth rates and our ability to regain CRM market share and increase CRM net sales;
 
·  
The overall performance of and referring physician, implanting physician and patient confidence in our and other CRM products and technologies, including our LATITUDE® Patient Management System and Frontier CRM technology;
 
·  
The results of CRM clinical trials undertaken by us, our competitors or other third parties;
 
·  
Our ability to launch various products utilizing the Frontier CRM technology, our next generation CRM pulse generator platform, in the U.S. over the next 36 months and to expand our CRM market position through reinvestment in our CRM products and technologies;
 
·  
Our ability to retain our CRM sales force and other key personnel;
 
·  
Competitive offerings in the CRM market and the timing of receipt of regulatory approvals to market existing and anticipated CRM products and technologies; and
 
   ·  
Our ability to avoid disruption in the supply of certain components or materials or to quickly secure additional or replacement components or materials on a timely basis.
 
Coronary Stent Business
 
 
   ·
Volatility in the coronary stent market, competitive offerings and the timing of receipt of regulatory approvals to market existing and anticipated drug-eluting stent technology and other coronary and peripheral stent platforms;

 
   ·
Our ability to launch our TAXUS® Express 2 coronary stent system in Japan during the second half of 2007, and to launch our next-generation drug-eluting stent system, the TAXUS® Liberté™ coronary stent system, in the U.S., subject to regulatory approval, and to maintain or expand our worldwide market leadership positions through reinvestment in our drug-eluting stent program;

 
   ·  
The continued availability of our TAXUS stent system in sufficient quantities and mix, our ability to prevent disruptions to our TAXUS stent system manufacturing processes and to maintain or replenish inventory levels consistent with forecasted demand around the world as we transition to next-generation stent products;

     ·
The impact of concerns relating to late stent thrombosis on the size of the coronary stent market, distribution of share within the coronary stent market in the U.S. and around the world, the average number of stents used per procedure and average selling prices;

 
   ·  
The overall performance of and continued physician confidence in our and other drug-eluting stents, our ability to adequately address concerns regarding the risk of late stent thrombosis, and the results of drug-eluting stent clinical trials undertaken by us, our competitors or other third parties;

 
   ·  
Our ability to sustain or increase the penetration rate of drug-eluting stent technology in the U.S. and our European and Inter-Continental markets;

·   
Our ability to take advantage of our position as one of two early entrants in the U.S. drug-eluting stent market, to anticipate competitor products as they enter the market and to respond to the challenges presented as additional competitors enter the U.S. drug-eluting stent market;

 
   ·
Our ability to manage inventory levels, accounts receivable, gross margins and operating expenses relating to our drug-eluting stent systems and other product franchises and to react effectively to worldwide economic and political conditions;

·   
Our ability to manage the launch of our PROMUS™ everolimus-eluting stent system and the supply of this stent system in sufficient quantities and mix; and

·   
Our ability to manage the mix of our PROMUS stent system revenue relative to our total drug-eluting stent revenue and maintain our overall profitability as a percentage of revenue.
 
Litigation and Regulatory Compliance
 
 
   ·  
Any conditions imposed in resolving, or any inability to resolve, our outstanding warning letters or other FDA matters, as well as risks generally associated with our regulatory compliance quality systems and complaint handling;

·   
The effect of our litigation, risk management practices, including self-insurance, and compliance activities on our loss contingency, legal provision and cash flow;

 
    · 
The impact of our stockholder derivative and class action, patent, product liability, contract and other litigation and other legal proceedings;

 
   · 
The ongoing, inherent risk of potential physician communications or field actions related to medical devices;

·   
Costs associated with our incremental compliance and quality initiatives, including Project Horizon; and

·   
The availability and rate of third-party reimbursement for our products and procedures.
 
Innovation
 
 
   · 
Our ability to complete planned clinical trials successfully, to obtain regulatory approvals and to develop and launch products on a timely basis within cost estimates, including the successful completion of in-process projects from purchased research and development;

 
   ·
Our ability to manage research and development and other operating expenses consistent with our expected revenue growth;

 
   · 
Our ability to fund and achieve benefits from our focus on internal research and development and external alliances as well as our ability to capitalize on opportunities across our businesses;

 
   · 
Our ability to develop products and technologies successfully in addition to our drug-eluting stent and cardiac rhythm management technologies;

 
   · 
Our ability to develop next-generation products and technologies within our drug-eluting stent and cardiac rhythm management business;
 
 
   · 
Our failure to succeed at, or our decision to discontinue, any of our growth initiatives;

 
    · 
Our ability to integrate the acquisitions and other strategic alliances we have consummated, including Guidant;

 
   · 
Our decision to exercise, or not to exercise, options to purchase certain companies party to our strategic alliances and our ability to fund with cash or common stock these and other acquisitions, or to fund contingent payments associated with these alliances;

 
   · 
The timing, size and nature of strategic initiatives, market opportunities and research and development platforms available to us and the ultimate cost and success of these initiatives; and

 
   · 
Our ability to successfully identify, develop and market new products or the ability of others to develop products or technologies that render our products or technologies noncompetitive or obsolete.
 
International Markets
 
 
   · 
Dependency on international net sales to achieve growth;

 
   · 
Risks associated with international operations, including compliance with local legal and regulatory requirements as well as reimbursement practices and policies; and
 
 
   ·    
The potential effect of foreign currency fluctuations and interest rate fluctuations on our net sales, expenses and resulting margins.
 
Liquidity
 
 
   ·   
Our ability to generate sufficient cash flow to fund operations and capital expenditures, as well as our strategic investments over the next twelve months and to maintain borrowing flexibility beyond the next twelve months;

 
   ·
Our ability to access the public capital markets and to issue debt or equity securities on terms reasonably acceptable to us;

 
   ·  
Our ability to achieve a 21 percent effective tax rate, excluding certain charges, during 2007 and to recover substantially all of our deferred tax assets;

·   
Our ability to maintain investment-grade credit ratings and satisfy our financial covenants;

·   
Our ability to generate sufficient cash flow to effectively manage our debt levels and minimize the impact of interest rate fluctuations on our floating-rate debt; and

 
   ·  
Our ability to better align expenses with future expected revenue levels and reallocate resources to support our future growth.
 
Other
 
 
   ·   
Risks associated with significant changes made or to be made to our organizational structure or to the membership of our executive committee; and

 
   ·   
Risks associated with our acquisition of Guidant Corporation, including, among other things, the indebtedness we have incurred and the integration costs and challenges we will continue to face.
 
Several important factors, in addition to the specific factors discussed in connection with each forward-looking statement individually and the risk factors described in Item 1A under the heading “Risk Factors,” could affect our future results and growth rates and could cause those results and rates to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements and the risk factors contained in this report. These additional factors include, among other things, future economic, competitive, reimbursement and regulatory conditions, new product introductions, demographic trends, intellectual property, financial market conditions and future business decisions made by us and our competitors, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control. Therefore, we wish to caution each reader of this report to consider carefully these factors as well as the specific factors discussed with each forward-looking statement and risk factor in this report and as disclosed in our filings with the SEC. These factors, in some cases, have affected and in the future (together with other factors) could affect our ability to implement our business strategy and may cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the statements expressed in this report.
 
 
In addition to the other information contained in this Form 10-K and the exhibits hereto, the following risk factors should be considered carefully in evaluating our business. Our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected by any of these risks. This section contains forward-looking statements. You should refer to the explanation of the qualifications and limitations on forward-looking statements set forth at the end of Item 1 of this Form 10-K. Additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
 
We derive a significant portion of our revenue from the sale of drug-eluting coronary stent systems and a decline in market size or our market share of drug-eluting stents may adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.
 
Drug-eluting coronary stent revenues represented approximately 30 percent of our consolidated net sales during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. Our U.S. TAXUS sales declined in 2006 relative to 2005, due in part to a decline in the U.S. market size attributable to recent uncertainty regarding the risk of late stent thrombosis following the use of drug-eluting stents. Late stent thrombosis is the formation of a clot, or thrombus, within the stented area one year or more after implantation of the stent. In the fourth quarter of 2006, the FDA held a special ad visory panel meeting to discuss drug-eluting stents. If concerns about the risk of late stent thrombosis persist, there can be no assurance that the market will return to previous levels.  

In addition, lower device utilization per procedure and a decline in the overall percutaneous coronary intervention market contributed to the decline in our TAXUS stent system sales in 2006. There can be no assurance that these concerns will be alleviated in the near term or that drug-eluting stent penetration rates will return to previous levels. Our TAXUS® coronary stent system and Johnson & Johnson’s CYPHER® drug-eluting stent system are currently the only two drug-eluting stents available in the U.S. market. We expect our share of the drug-eluting stent market, as well as unit prices, to continue to be adversely affected as additional significant competitors enter the drug-eluting stent market, which began during the third quarter of 2005 internationally and is expected to continue to occur as early as the second half of 2007 in the U.S. In July 2005, Medtronic, Inc. received approval from European regulators to begin commercial sales of its Endeavor® drug-eluting stent system in the European market. As a result of Abbott’s acquisition of Guidant’s drug-eluting stent portfolio, Abbott sells its XIENCE™ V everolimus-eluting stent system in competition with us in certain international markets. In addition, Conor Medsystems, Inc., which was recently acquired by Johnson & Johnson, sells its CoStar® paclitaxel-eluting stent system in competition with us in certain international markets.
 
The manufacture of our TAXUS® coronary stent system involves the integration of multiple technologies, critical components, raw materials and complex processes. Significant favorable or unfavorable changes in forecasted demand, as well as disruptions associated with our TAXUS® stent manufacturing process, may impact our inventory levels. Variability in expected demand or the timing of the launch of next-generation products may result in excess or expired inventory positions and future inventory charges, which may adversely impact our results from operations. We share with Abbott rights to Guidant’s XIENCE™ V everolimus-eluting stent program. As a result, delays in receipt of regulatory approvals for the XIENCE™ V everolimus-eluting stent system, receipt of insufficient quantities of the PROMUS everolimus-eluting stent from Abbott or material nonacceptance of these stents in the marketplace could adversely affect our results from operations, as well as our ability to effectively differentiate ourselves from our competitors in the drug-eluting stent market as the leading company with two drug-eluting stent programs.
 
The worldwide CRM market growth rates declined during 2006 and if the CRM market does not recover, our results of operation and financial condition may be adversely impacted.
 
During 2005 and 2006, the operating and financial performance of our CRM business has been adversely impacted by various implantable defibrillator and pacemaker system field actions in the industry and a corresponding reduction in CRM market growth rates. We believe that field actions in the industry contributed to our CRM division having a lower market share for implantable defibrillator and pacemaker systems for 2006 as compared to 2005. The worldwide CRM market growth rate, including the U.S. defibrillator market growth rate, declined during the first three quarters of 2006; these growth levels are below those experienced in recent years. The U.S. defibrillator market represents approximately half of the worldwide CRM market. There can be no assurance that the CRM market will return to its historical growth rate
 
or that we will be able to regain CRM market share or increase net sales in a timely manner, if at all.
 
Because we derive a significant amount of our revenues from our cardiovascular business, changes in market or regulatory conditions that impact that business or our inability to develop non-cardiovascular products, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operation.
 
During 2006, approximately 80 percent of our net sales were derived from our cardiovascular business, which includes our interventional cardiology, cardiac rhythm management and cardiovascular divisions. As a result, our sales growth and profitability from our cardiovascular business may be limited by risks and uncertainties related to market or regulatory conditions that impact that business.  For example, if the worldwide CRM market and the U.S. ICD market do not return to their historical growth rates or we are unable to regain CRM market share or increase CRM net sales, it may adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operation.  Coronary stent revenue represented approximately 32 percent of our consolidated net sales for 2006.  If the decline in U.S. drug-eluting stent market penetration attributable to concerns regarding the risk of late stent thrombosis following the use of drug-eluting stents or the declines in device utilization per procedure and overall percutaneous coronary intervention volumes continue, there can be no assurance that the drug-eluting stent market will recover to previous levels which may have a material adverse effect on our business.  Similarly, our inability to develop products and technologies successfully in addition to our drug-eluting stent and cardiac rhythm management technologies could further expose us to fluctuations and uncertainties in these markets.
 
We may be unable to resolve issues related to our warning letters in a timely manner, which could delay the production and sale of our products and have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operation.
 
We are currently taking remedial action in response to certain deficiencies of our quality systems as cited by the FDA in its warning letters to us. For example, on January 26, 2006, we received a corporate warning letter from the FDA notifying us of serious regulatory problems at three of our facilities and advising us that our corrective action plan relating to three site-specific warning letters issued to us in 2005 was inadequate. As stated in this FDA warning letter, the FDA may not grant our requests for exportation certificates to foreign governments or approve pre-market approval (PMA) applications for our class III devices to which the quality control or current good manufacturing practices deficiencies described in the letter are reasonably related until the deficiencies have been corrected. If we are unable to resolve the issues raised by the FDA in its warning letters to the satisfaction of the FDA on a timely basis, we may not be able to launch our new class III devices as planned, including our Taxus® Liberté™ drug-eluting stent system in the United States, which may weaken our competitive position in the markets in which we participate.
 
In addition, in December 2005, Guidant received an FDA warning letter citing certain deficiencies with respect to its manufacturing quality systems and record keeping procedures in its CRM facility in St. Paul, Minnesota. This FDA warning letter followed an inspection by the FDA that was completed on September 1, 2005 and cited a number of observations. Guidant received a follow-up letter from the FDA dated January 5, 2006. As stated in this follow-up letter, until the identified deficiencies have been corrected, the FDA may not grant requests for exportation certificates to foreign governments or approve PMA applications for class III devices to which the deficiencies described are reasonably related. The FDA conducted a further inspection of the CRM facility between December 15, 2005 and February 9, 2006 and made one additional inspectional observation. The FDA has concluded its reinspection of our CRM facilities. We may be required to take additional actions in order to comply with any FDA observations that we may receive.
 
We may face enforcement actions in connection with these FDA warning letters, including injunctive relief, consent decrees or civil fines. While we are working with the FDA to resolve these issues, this work has required and will continue to require the dedication of significant incremental internal and external resources and has resulted in adjustments to the product launch schedules of certain products and the decision to discontinue certain other product lines over time. There can be no assurances regarding the length of time or cost it will take us to resolve these issues to the satisfaction of the FDA. In addition, if our remedial actions are not satisfactory to the FDA, we may have to devote additional financial and human resources to our efforts and the FDA may take further regulatory actions against us including, but not limited to, seizing our product inventory, obtaining a court injunction against further marketing of our products, assessing civil monetary penalties or imposing a consent decree on us, which could result in further regulatory constraints, including the governance of our quality system by a third party. If we or our manufacturers fail to adhere to QSR or ISO requirements, this could delay production of our products and lead to fines, difficulties in obtaining regulatory clearances, recalls or other consequences, which could in turn have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
 
We are subject to extensive medical device regulation which may impede or hinder the approval process for our products and, in some cases, may not ultimately result in approval or may result in the recall or seizure of previously approved products.
 
Our products, development activities and manufacturing processes are subject to extensive and rigorous regulation by the FDA pursuant to the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FDC Act), by comparable agencies in foreign countries, and by other regulatory agencies and governing bodies. Under the FDC Act, medical devices must receive FDA clearance or approval before they can be commercially marketed in the U.S. In addition, most major markets for medical devices outside the U.S. require clearance, approval or compliance with certain standards before a product can be commercially marketed. The process of obtaining marketing approval or clearance from the FDA for new products, or with respect to enhancements or modifications to existing products, could:
 
• take a significant period of time;
• require the expenditure of substantial resources;
• involve rigorous pre-clinical and clinical testing;
• require changes to the products; and
• result in limitations on the indicated uses of the products.

Countries around the world have recently adopted more stringent regulatory requirements that are expected to add to the delays and uncertainties associated with new product releases, as well as the clinical and regulatory costs of supporting those releases. Even after products have received marketing approval or clearance, product approvals and clearances by the FDA can be withdrawn due to failure to comply with regulatory standards or the occurrence of unforeseen problems following initial approval. There can be no assurance that we will receive the required clearances from the FDA for new products or modifications to existing products on a timely basis or that any FDA approval will not be subsequently withdrawn.

In addition, regulations regarding the development, manufacture and sale of medical devices are subject to future change. We cannot predict what impact, if any, those changes might have on our business. Failure to comply with regulatory requirements could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product or manufacturer could result in fines, delays or suspensions of regulatory clearances, seizures or recalls of products, operating restrictions and/or criminal prosecution. The failure to receive product approval clearance on a timely basis, suspensions of regulatory clearances, seizures or recalls of products or the withdrawal of product approval by the FDA could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
 
 
As a device manufacturer, we are required to register with the FDA and are subject to periodic inspection by the FDA for compliance with the FDA’s Quality System Regulation (QSR) requirements, which require manufacturers of medical devices to adhere to certain regulations, including testing, quality control and documentation procedures. In addition, the federal Medical Device Reporting regulations require us to provide information to the FDA whenever there is evidence that reasonably suggests that a device may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or, if a malfunction were to occur, could cause or contribute to a death or serious injury. Compliance with applicable regulatory requirements is subject to continual review and is
 
rigorously monitored through periodic inspections by the FDA. In the European Community, we are required to maintain certain ISO certifications in order to sell our products and must undergo periodic inspections by notified bodies to obtain and maintain these certifications.
 
Pending and future intellectual property litigation could be costly and disruptive to us.
 
We operate in an industry that is susceptible to significant intellectual property litigation and, in recent years, it has been common for companies in the medical device field to aggressively challenge the patent rights of other companies in order to prevent the marketing of new devices. We are currently the subject of various patent litigation proceedings and other proceedings described in more detail under Item 3. Legal Proceedings. Intellectual property litigation is expensive, complex and lengthy and its outcome is difficult to predict. Pending or future patent litigation may result in significant royalty or other payments or injunctions that can prevent the sale of products and may significantly divert the attention of our technical and management personnel. In the event that our right to market any of our products is successfully challenged, and if we fail to obtain a required license or are unable to design around a patent, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
 
We may not effectively be able to protect our intellectual property rights which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
 
The medical device market in which we primarily participate is in large part technology driven. Physician customers, particularly in interventional cardiology, move quickly to new products and new technologies. As a result, intellectual property rights, particularly patents and trade secrets, play a significant role in product development and differentiation. However, intellectual property litigation to defend or create market advantage is inherently complex and unpredictable. Furthermore, appellate courts frequently overturn lower court patent decisions.
 
In addition, competing parties frequently file multiple suits to leverage patent portfolios across product lines, technologies and geographies and to balance risk and exposure between the parties. In some cases, several competitors are parties in the same proceeding, or in a series of related proceedings, or litigate multiple features of a single class of devices. These forces frequently drive settlement not only of individual cases, but also of a series of pending and potentially related and unrelated cases. In addition, although monetary and injunctive relief is typically sought, remedies and restitution are generally not determined until the conclusion of the proceedings and are frequently modified on appeal. Accordingly, the outcomes of individual cases are difficult to time, predict or quantify and are often dependent upon the outcomes of other cases in other geographies.
 
Several third parties have asserted that our current and former stent systems or other products infringe patents owned or licensed by them. Adverse outcomes in one or more of these proceedings against us could limit our ability to sell certain stent products in certain jurisdictions, or reduce our operating margin on the sale of these products. In addition, damage awards related to historical sales could be material. We have similarly asserted that stent systems or other products sold by these companies infringe patents owned or licensed by us.
 
Patents and other proprietary rights are and will be essential to our business, and our ability to compete effectively with other companies will be dependent upon the proprietary nature of our technologies. We rely upon trade secrets, know-how, continuing technological innovations, strategic alliances and licensing opportunities to develop, maintain and strengthen our competitive position. We pursue a policy of generally obtaining patent protection in both the U.S. and abroad for patentable subject matter in our proprietary devices and also attempt to review
 
third-party patents and patent applications to the extent publicly available to develop an effective patent strategy, avoid infringement of third-party patents, identify licensing opportunities and monitor the patent claims of others. We currently own numerous U.S. and foreign patents and have numerous patent applications pending. We also are party to various license agreements pursuant to which patent rights have been obtained or granted in consideration for cash, cross-licensing rights or royalty payments. No assurance can be made that any pending or future patent applications will result in issued patents, that any current or future patents issued to, or licensed by, us will not be challenged or circumvented by our competitors, or that our patents will not be found invalid.
 
In addition, we may have to take legal action in the future to protect our patents, trade secrets or know-how or to assert them against claimed infringement by others. Any legal action of that type could be costly and time consuming to us and no assurances can be made that any lawsuit will be successful. We are generally involved as both a plaintiff and a defendant in a number of patent infringement and other intellectual property-related actions. We are involved in numerous patent-related claims with our competitors, including Johnson & Johnson.
 
The invalidation of key patents or proprietary rights that we own, or an unsuccessful outcome in lawsuits to protect our intellectual property, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results of operations.
 
Pending and future product liability claims and other litigation, including private securities litigation, shareholder derivative suits and contract litigation, may adversely affect our business, reputation and ability to attract and retain customers.
 
The design, manufacture and marketing of medical devices of the types that we produce entail an inherent risk of product liability claims. Many of the medical devices that we manufacture and sell are designed to be implanted in the human body for long periods of time or indefinitely. A number of factors could result in an unsafe condition or injury to, or death of, a patient with respect to these or other products that we manufacture or sell, including component failures, manufacturing flaws, design defects or inadequate disclosure of product-related risks or product-related information. These factors could result in product liability claims, a recall of one or more of our products or a safety alert relating to one or more of our products. Product liability claims may be brought by individuals or by groups seeking to represent a class.
 
We are currently the subject of numerous product liability claims and other litigation, including private securities litigation and shareholder derivative suits including, but not limited to, the claims and litigation described under Item 3. Legal Proceedings . In connection with our acquisition of Guidant, the number of product liability claims and other legal proceedings filed against us, including private securities litigation and shareholder derivative suits, significantly increased. We are currently involved in litigation involving a contract dispute with certain former shareholders of Advanced Bionics Corporation, one of our subsidiaries. The outcome of this litigation could prevent us from operating the Advanced Bionics business in the manner that we expected at the time of acquisition.
 
The outcome of litigation, particularly class action lawsuits, is difficult to assess or quantify. Plaintiffs in these types of lawsuits often seek recovery of very large or indeterminate amounts, including not only actual damages, but also punitive damages. The magnitude of the potential loss relating to these lawsuits may remain unknown for substantial periods of time. In addition, the cost to defend against any future litigation may be significant. Further, we are substantially self-insured with respect to general, product liability claims and securities litigation. As a result of economic factors currently impacting the insurance industry, meaningful product liability and
 
securities litigation insurance coverage has become unavailable due to its economically prohibitive cost. The absence of significant third-party insurance coverage increases our potential exposure to unanticipated claims and adverse decisions. Product liability claims, product recalls, securities litigation and other litigation in the future, regardless of their outcome, could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
 
We may not be successful in our strategic acquisitions of, investments in or alliances with, other companies and businesses, which have been a significant source of historical growth for us.
 
Our strategic acquisitions, investments and alliances are intended to further expand our ability to offer customers effective, high quality medical devices that satisfy their interventional needs. Many of these alliances involve equity investments and often give us the option to acquire the other company or assets of the other company in the future. If we are unsuccessful in our acquisitions, investments and alliances, we may be unable to continue to grow our business significantly or may record asset impairment charges in the future. These acquisitions, investments and alliances have been significant sources of growth for us. The success of any acquisition, investment or alliance that we may undertake will depend on a number of factors, including:
 
  our ability to identify suitable opportunities for acquisition, investment or alliance, if at all;

  our ability to finance any future acquisition, investment or alliance on terms acceptable to us, if at all;

  whether we are able to establish an acquisition, investment or alliance on terms that are satisfactory to us, if at all;

  the strength of the other companies’ underlying technology and ability to execute;

•    intellectual property and litigation related to these technologies; and

  our ability to successfully integrate the acquired company or business with our existing business, including the ability to adequately fund acquired in-process research and development projects.
 
If we are unsuccessful in our acquisitions, investments and alliances, we may be unable to continue to grow our business significantly or may record asset impairment charges in the future.
 
We incurred substantial indebtedness in connection with our acquisition of Guidant and if we are unable to manage our debt levels and maintain our investment-grade credit ratings, it could have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
 
We had outstanding borrowings of $8.9 billion at December 31, 2006, attributable in large part to our acquisition of Guidant. We will be required to use a significant portion of our operating cash flow to reduce our outstanding debt obligations over the next several years. We are examining all of our operations in order to identify cost improvement measures that will better align operating expenses with expected revenue levels and cash flow, and may decide to sell certain non-strategic assets or implement other strategic initiatives to generate proceeds that would be available for debt repayment. Certain of our debt agreements contain financial covenants that require us to maintain specified financial ratios. If we are unable to maintain these ratios, we may be required to obtain waivers from our lenders and no assurance can be made that our lenders
 
would grant such waivers on favorable terms or at all. While our credit ratings are currently investment grade, our Moody’s and S&P ratings outlooks are currently negative. Our inability to maintain our investment grade credit ratings could make it more expensive for us to borrow funds or issue debt securities in the public capital markets on terms reasonably acceptable to us.
 
Our future growth is dependent upon the development of new products, which requires significant research and development, clinical trials and regulatory approvals, all of which are very expensive and time-consuming and may not result in a commercially viable product.
 
In order to develop new products and improve current product offerings, we focus our research and development programs largely on the development of next-generation and novel technology offerings across multiple programs and divisions, particularly in our drug-eluting stent and CRM programs. We expect to launch our TAXUS® Liberté™ coronary stent system in the U.S., subject to regulatory approval. In addition, we expect to continue to invest in our CRM technologies, including our LATITUDE® Patient Management System and the Frontier CRM technology. If we are unable to develop and launch these and other products as anticipated, our ability to maintain or expand our market position in the drug-eluting stent and CRM markets may be adversely impacted.
 
Further, we expect to invest selectively in areas outside of drug-eluting stent and CRM technologies. There can be no assurance that these or other technologies will achieve technological feasibility, obtain regulatory approval or gain market acceptance. A delay in the development or approval of these technologies or our decision to reduce funding of these projects may adversely impact the contribution of these technologies to our future growth.
 
As a part of the regulatory process of obtaining marketing clearance from the FDA for new products, we conduct and participate in numerous clinical trials with a variety of study designs, patient populations and trial endpoints. Unfavorable or inconsistent clinical data from existing or future clinical trials conducted by us, by our competitors or by third parties, or the market’s perception of this clinical data, may adversely impact our ability to obtain product approvals from the FDA, our position in, and share of, the markets in which we participate and our business, financial condition, results of operations or future prospects.
 
We face intense competition and may not be able to keep pace with the rapid technological changes in the medical devices industry, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
 
The medical device market is highly competitive. We encounter significant competition across our product lines and in each market in which our products are sold from various medical device companies, some of which may have greater financial and marketing resources than we do. Our primary competitors have historically included Johnson & Johnson (including its subsidiary, Cordis Corporation) and Medtronic, Inc. (including its subsidiary, Medtronic AVE, Inc.). Through our acquisition of Guidant, Abbott has become a primary competitor of ours in the interventional cardiology market and St. Jude Medical, Inc. has become a competitor of ours in the CRM market and in the Neuromodulation market. In addition, we face competition from a wide range of companies that sell a single or a limited number of competitive products or which participate only in a specific market segment, as well as from non-medical device companies, including pharmaceutical companies, which may offer alternative therapies for disease states intended to be treated using our products.
 
Additionally, the medical device market is characterized by extensive research and development, and rapid technological change. Developments by other companies of new or improved products,
 
processes or technologies, in particular in the drug-eluting stent and CRM markets, may make our products or proposed products obsolete or less competitive and may negatively impact our revenues. We are required to devote continued efforts and financial resources to develop or acquire scientifically advanced technologies and products, apply our technologies cost-effectively across product lines and markets, attract and retain skilled development personnel, obtain patent and other protection for our technologies and products, obtain required regulatory and reimbursement approvals and successfully manufacture and market our products consistent with our quality standards. If we fail to develop new products or enhance existing products, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
 
Because we derive a significant amount of our revenues from international operations and a significant percentage of our future growth is expected to come from international operations, changes in international economic or regulatory conditions could have a material impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
 
Sales outside the U.S. accounted for approximately 38 percent of our net sales in 2006. Additionally, a significant percentage of our future growth is expected to come from international operations. As a result, our sales growth and profitability from our international operations may be limited by risks and uncertainties related to economic conditions in these regions, foreign currency fluctuations, exchange rate fluctuations, regulatory and reimbursement approvals, competitive offerings, infrastructure development, rights to intellectual property and our ability to implement our overall business strategy. Further, international markets are also being affected by economic pressure to contain reimbursement levels and healthcare costs. The trend in countries around the world, including Japan, toward more stringent regulatory requirements for product clearance, changing reimbursement models and more rigorous inspection and enforcement activities has generally caused or may cause medical device manufacturers to experience more uncertainty, delay, risk and expense. In addition, we are required to renew regulatory approvals and obtain exportation certificates to foreign governments in order to market our products in certain international jurisdictions, which may require additional testing and documentation. These approvals and certificates have been impacted by the FDA warning letters we have received. If sufficient resources are not available to renew these approvals or these approvals are not timely renewed, our ability to market our full line of existing products within these jurisdictions may be limited. Any significant changes in the competitive, political, legal, regulatory, reimbursement or economic environment where we conduct international operations may have a material impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
 
 
Our products are purchased principally by hospitals or physicians, which typically bill various third-party payors, including governmental programs (e.g., Medicare and Medicaid), private insurance plans and managed care plans, for the healthcare services provided to their patients. The ability of customers to obtain appropriate reimbursement for their products and services from private and governmental third-party payors is critical to the success of medical technology companies. The availability of reimbursement affects which products customers purchase and the prices they are willing to pay. Reimbursement varies from country to country and can significantly impact the acceptance of new products and services. After we develop a promising new product, we may find limited demand for the product unless reimbursement approval is obtained from private and governmental third-party payors. Further legislative or administrative
 
reforms to the U.S. or international reimbursement systems in a manner that significantly reduces reimbursement for procedures using our medical devices or denies coverage for those procedures could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
 
Major third-party payors for hospital services in the U.S. and abroad continue to work to contain healthcare costs. The introduction of cost containment incentives, combined with closer scrutiny of healthcare expenditures by both private health insurers and employers, has resulted in increased discounts and contractual adjustments to hospital charges for services performed and has shifted services between inpatient and outpatient settings. Initiatives to limit the increase of healthcare costs, including price regulation, are also underway in several countries in which we do business. Hospitals or physicians may respond to these cost-containment pressures by substituting lower cost products or other therapies for our products. In light of the Guidant product recalls, third-party payors may seek claims and further recourse against us for the recalled defibrillator and pacemaker systems for which Guidant had previously received reimbursement.
 
Consolidation in the healthcare industry could lead to demands for price concessions or the exclusion of some suppliers from certain of our significant market segments, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
 
The cost of healthcare has risen significantly over the past decade and numerous initiatives and reforms initiated by legislators, regulators and third-party payors to curb these costs have resulted in a consolidation trend in the healthcare industry, including hospitals. This in turn has resulted in greater pricing pressures and the exclusion of certain suppliers from important market segments as group purchasing organizations, independent delivery networks and large single accounts continue to consolidate purchasing decisions for some of our hospital customers. We expect that market demand, government regulation, third-party reimbursement policies and societal pressures will continue to change the worldwide healthcare industry, resulting in further business consolidations and alliances among our customers and competitors, which may reduce competition, exert further downward pressure on the prices of our products and may adversely impact our business, financial condition or results of operations.
 
 
We vertically integrate operations where integration provides significant cost, supply or quality benefits. However, we purchase many of the materials and components used in manufacturing our products, some of which are custom made. Certain supplies are purchased from single-sources due to quality considerations, costs or constraints resulting from regulatory requirements. We may not be able to establish additional or replacement suppliers for certain components or materials in a timely manner largely due to the complex nature of our and many of our suppliers’ manufacturing processes. Production issues, including capacity constraint; quality issues affecting us or our suppliers; an inability to develop and validate alternative sources if required; or a significant increase in the price of materials or components could adversely affect our operations and financial condition.
 
 
There are no material unresolved written comments that were received from the SEC staff 180 days or more before the end of our fiscal year relating to our periodic or current reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
 
 
Our world headquarters are located in Natick, Massachusetts. We have regional headquarters located in Tokyo, Japan and Paris, France. As of December 31, 2006, our manufacturing, research, distribution and other key facilities totaled more than 8,242,344 million square feet, of which more than 5,838,787 million square feet was owned by us and the balance is leased. As of December 31, 2006, our principal manufacturing and technology centers were located in Massachusetts, Indiana, Minnesota, New Jersey, Florida, California, New York, Utah, Washington, Puerto Rico, Ireland, Costa Rica and Japan, and our principal distribution centers were located in Massachusetts, The Netherlands and Japan. As of December 31, 2006, we maintained 37 manufacturing, distribution and technology centers, 25 in the U.S., one in Puerto Rico, five in Ireland, one in Costa Rica, two in The Netherlands and two in Japan. We also share a training facility in Brussels, Belgium with Abbott. Many of these facilities produce and manufacture products for more than one of our divisions and include research facilities.

             
(in square feet)
 
Total Space
 
Owned
 
Leased
Domestic
 
6,255,900
 
4,353,965
 
1,901,935
Foreign
 
1,986,444
 
1,484,822
 
   501,622
Total
 
8,242,344
 
5,838,787
 
2,403,557
             
 
 
See Note J—Commitments and Contingencies to our 2006 consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
 
 
None.
 
PART II
 
 
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol BSX. Our annual CEO certification for the previous year has been submitted to the NYSE.
 
The following table shows the market range for our common stock for each of the last eight quarters based on reported sales prices on the New York Stock Exchange.

2006
 
High
 
Low
 
First Quarter
 
$
26.48
 
$
20.90
 
Second Quarter
   
23.30
   
16.65
 
Third Quarter
   
17.75
   
14.77
 
Fourth Quarter
   
17.18
   
14.65
 
2005
             
First Quarter
 
$
35.19
 
$
28.67
 
Second Quarter
   
30.80
   
27.00
 
Third Quarter
   
28.95
   
23.05
 
Fourth Quarter
   
27.33
   
22.95
 
 
We have not paid a cash dividend during the past two years. We currently do not intend to pay dividends, and intend to retain all of our earnings to repay indebtedness and invest in the continued growth of our business. We may consider declaring and paying a dividend in the future; however, there can be no assurance that we will do so.
 
At February 23, 2007, there were 13,832 record holders of our common stock.
 
The closing price of our common stock on February 23, 2007 was $17.12.
 
There were no shares repurchased under our share repurchase program in 2006. There are approximately 37 million shares available for repurchase under our share repurchase program.
 
Stock Performance Graph

The graph below compares the five-year total return to stockholders on our common stock with the return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index and the Standard & Poor’s Healthcare Equipment Index. The graph assumes $100 was invested in our common stock and in each of the named indices on January 1, 2002, and that all dividends were reinvested.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
 
(in millions, except per share data)
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
2006
 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
 
2002
 
                       
Operating Data
                         
Net sales
 
$
7,821
 
$
6,283
 
$
5,624
 
$
3,476
 
$
2,919
 
Gross profit
   
5,614
   
4,897
   
4,332
   
2,515
   
2,049
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses
   
2,675
   
1,814
   
1,742
   
1,171
   
1,002
 
Research and development expenses
   
1,008
   
680
   
569
   
452
   
343
 
Royalty expense
   
231
   
227
   
195
   
54
   
36
 
Amortization expense
   
530
   
152
   
112
   
89
   
72
 
Litigation-related charges (credits), net
         
780
   
75
   
15
   
(99
)
Purchased research and development
   
4,119
   
276
   
65
   
37
   
85
 
Total operating expenses
   
8,563
   
3,929
   
2,758
   
1,818
   
1,439
 
Operating (loss) income
   
(2,949
)
 
968
   
1,574
   
697
   
610
 
Loss (income) before income taxes
   
(3,535
)
 
891
   
1,494
   
643
   
549
 
Net (loss) income
   
(3,577
)
 
628
   
1,062
   
472
   
373
 
 
                               
Net (loss) income per common share — basic
 
$
(2.81
)
$
0.76
 
$
1.27
 
$
0.57
 
$
0.46
 
Net (loss) income per common share — assuming dilution
 
$
(2.81
)
$
0.75
 
$
1.24
 
$
0.56
 
$
0.45
 
 
                               
Weighted average shares outstanding — assuming dilution
   
1,273.7
   
837.6
   
857.7
   
845.4
   
830.0
 


As of December 31,
 
2006
 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
 
2002
 
                       
Balance Sheet Data
                         
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities
 
$
1,668
 
$
848
 
$
1,640
 
$
752
 
$
260
 
Working capital
   
2,271
   
1,152
   
684
   
487
   
285
 
Total assets
   
31,096
   
8,196
   
8,170
   
5,699
   
4,450
 
Borrowings (long-term and short-term)
   
8,902
   
2,020
   
2,367
   
1,725
   
935
 
Stockholders’ equity
   
15,298
   
4,282
   
4,025
   
2,862
   
2,467
 
Book value per common share
 
$
10.37
 
$
5.22
 
$
4.82
 
$
3.46
 
$
3.00
 
 
On April 21, 2006, we consummated our acquisition of Guidant.  We consolidated Guidant’s operating results with those of Boston Scientific beginning on the date of acquisition.  See Note D - Business Combinations for further details regarding the transaction.
 
We paid a two-for-one stock split that was effected in the form of a 100 percent stock dividend on November 5, 2003. We have restated all historical amounts above to reflect the stock split.
 
See also the notes to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 below.
ITEM 7.       MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
Overview
 
Boston Scientific Corporation is a worldwide developer, manufacturer and marketer of medical devices that are used in a broad range of interventional medical specialties. Our mission is to improve the quality of patient care and the productivity of healthcare delivery through the development and advocacy of less-invasive medical devices and procedures. This mission is accomplished through the continuing refinement of existing products and procedures and the investigation and development of new technologies that can reduce risk, trauma, cost, procedure time and the need for aftercare. Our approach to innovation combines internally developed products and technologies with those we obtain externally through our strategic acquisitions and alliances. Our quality policy, applicable to all employees, is “I improve the quality of patient care and all things Boston Scientific.”
 
Our management’s discussion and analysis (MD&A) begins with an overview of the Guidant acquisition, which represents a transforming event for Boston Scientific. It then provides an executive summary that outlines our financial highlights during 2006 and identifies some key trends that impacted operating results during the year. We supplement this summary with an in-depth look at the major issues we believe are most relevant to our current and future prospects. Next is an examination of the material changes in our operating results for 2006 as compared to 2005 and our operating results for 2005 as compared to 2004. The discussion then provides an examination of liquidity, focusing primarily on material changes in our operating, investing and financing cash flows, as depicted in our consolidated statements of cash flows, and the trends underlying these changes. Finally, the MD&A provides information on our critical accounting policies.
 
Guidant Acquisition and Abbott Transaction

On April 21, 2006, we consummated our acquisition of Guidant Corporation for an aggregate purchase price of $28.4 billion, which represented a combination of cash, common stock and fully vested stock options . The purchase price net of cash acquired was approximately $21.7 billion. In conjunction with the acquisition, we acquired approximately $6.7 billion of cash, including $4.1 billion in connection with Guidant’s prior sale of its vascular intervention and endovascular solutions businesses to Abbott Laboratories. With this acquisition, we have become a major provider in the more than $9 billion global Cardiac Rhythm Management (CRM) business, enhancing our overall competitive position and long-term growth potential and further diversifying our product portfolio. The acquisition has established us as one of the world’s largest cardiovascular device companies and a global leader in microelectronic therapeutics.

Guidant makes a variety of implantable devices that can monitor the heart and deliver electricity to treat cardiac abnormalities, including tachycardia, heart failure and bradycardia. These devices include implantable cardioverter defibrillator systems (ICDs) and pacemaker systems. In addition, Guidant also makes cardiac surgery systems to perform cardiac surgical ablation, endoscopic vessel harvesting and clampless beating-heart bypass surgery.

Prior to our acquisition of Guidant, Abbott acquired Guidant’s vascular intervention and endovascular solutions businesses and agreed to share the drug-eluting technology it acquired from Guidant with Boston Scientific. This agreement gives us access to a second drug-eluting stent program, which will complement our existing TAXUS ®  stent system program. See Note D - Business Combinations to our
 
2006 consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further details on the transaction.

We consolidated Guidant’s operating results with those of Boston Scientific beginning on the date of the acquisition, April 21, 2006. Since we have not restated our results retroactively to reflect the historical financial position or results of operations of Guidant, fluctuations in our operating results for 2006 are due primarily to the acquisition of Guidant. However, we have included supplemental pro forma financial information in Note D - Business Combinations to our 2006 consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K to give effect to the acquisition as though it had occurred at the beginning of 2006 and 2005.
 
Executive Summary
 
Our net sales in 2006 increased to $7.821 billion from $6.283 billion in 2005. Our reported net loss for 2006 was $3.577 billion, or $2.81 per diluted share, on approximately 1.274 billion weighted average shares outstanding as compared to net income of $628 million, or $0.75 per diluted share, on approximately 838 million weighted average shares outstanding in 2005. Our reported results included net after-tax charges primarily related to the acquisition of Guidant of $4.537 billion, or $3.55 per diluted share, in 2006 as compared to net after-tax charges of $894 million, or $1.07 per diluted share, in 2005. 1   In addition, our cash provided by operating activities was $1.845 billion in 2006 as compared to $903 million in 2005.
 
The growth in net sales resulted largely from our acquisition of Guidant, which accounted for sales of $1.503 billion. The geographic mix of Guidant sales included $1.025 billion of U.S. and $478 million of international sales. The business mix of Guidant sales consisted of $1.371 billion of CRM net sales and $132 million of Cardiac Surgery net sales. Our CRM net sales were comprised of $988 million of ICDs and $383 million of pacemaker systems. On a pro forma basis, assuming a full year of results, CRM sales were $2.026 billion in 2006 as compared to $2.28 billion in 2005. The decline, on a pro forma basis, was a result of lower average market shares for the Guidant devices in 2006 relative to 2005. We believe the lower market share, as well as reduced market growth rates, was due primarily to previous field actions in the industry. However, during the fourth quarter of 2006, we experienced a 10 percent sequential increase in net sales from our CRM business and a 13 percent increase for U.S. ICD sales, which we believe is a sign that our market share has increased and the CRM market is stabilizing and will return to growth. We remain focused on our share recovery.
 
The increase in our sales as a result of the acquisition of Guidant was partially offset by a decrease in TAXUS stent system sales to $2.358 billion in 2006 from $2.556 billion in 2005. The geographic mix of TAXUS stent system sales in 2006 included $1.561 billion of U.S. and $797 million of international sales. In 2005, we had $1.763 billion of U.S. and $793 million of international sales. The decline in TAXUS sales during 2006 was attributable to a decrease in the U.S. market size due to recent uncertainty regarding the risk of late stent thrombosis following the use of drug-eluting stents and a decline in
_________________________
1    The 2006 net after-tax charges consisted of: $4.477 billion in expenses resulting from purchase accounting associated primarily with purchased research and development obtained as part of the Guidant acquisition and the step-up value of acquired Guidant inventory sold; $143 million in acquisition-related costs, including the fair value adjustment related to the sharing of proceeds feature of the Abbott stock purchase, a CRM technology offering charge and other business integration costs; a $31 million credit resulting primarily from the reversal of accrued contingent payments due to the cancellation of the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) program that we obtained as part of the TriVascular, Inc. acquisition; $81 million in write-downs attributable to our investment portfolio; and a $133 million one-time tax benefit for the reversal of tax accruals previously established for offshore unremitted earnings. The 2005 net after-tax charges consisted of a $598 million litigation settlement with Medinol Ltd. and $267 million in purchased research and development attributable primarily to our 2005 acquisitions.
 
average market shares in 2006 relative to 2005. Late stent thrombosis is the formation of a clot, or thrombus, within the stented area one year or more after implantation of the stent. Exiting 2005, the percentage of drug-eluting stents used in U.S. interventional procedures were in the high 80 percent range, as compared to U.S. drug-eluting stent market penetration rates in the low 70 percent range exiting 2006. Our U.S. drug-eluting stent market share declined throughout the first three quarters of 2005, but has been stable during 2006 and we have maintained our market leadership position. W e expect to launch our TAXUS Express 2 stent system in the Japan market, which we believe exceeds $500 million, in the second half of 2007 and our TAXUS Liberté stent system in the U.S., subject to regulatory approvals.
 
During 2006, our worldwide Endosurgery group sales increased to $1.346 billion from $1.228 billion in 2005, an increase of 10 percent. Further, our Neuromodulation division, formed following the June 2004 acquisition of Advanced Bionics Corporation, generated $234 million in net sales during 2006 as compared to $148 million in 2005, an increase of 58 percent.
 
Our gross profit, as a percentage of net sales, declined from 77.9 percent in 2005 to 71.8 percent in 2006 largely as a result of certain one-time purchase accounting adjustments associated with the Guidant acquisition. In addition, our gross profit declined by approximately 2.0 percentage points due to period expenses, including costs associated with Project Horizon, a corporate-wide cross-functional initiative to improve and harmonize our overall quality processes and systems. Our gross profit also declined by 0.8 percentage points due to shifts in our product sales mix toward lower margin products, including CRM products and lower sales of TAXUS stents in the U.S.
 
Our operating expenses, excluding purchased research and development and litigation-related charges, increased $1.571 billion to $4.444 billion in 2006 from $2.873 billion in 2005. Of this increase, $1.299 billion related to operating expenses associated with the Guidant business. In the second half of 2006, we maintained existing spending levels given our expectation that the CRM market and the drug-eluting stent market will recover over time and this infrastructure will be necessary to support future growth. In addition, we announced our plan to reallocate certain CRM resources, including those in the research and development and sales and marketing functions; to increase innovation, productivity and competitiveness; and to enhance our ability to deliver new products to physicians and their patients. This plan resulted in a reduction of our CRM workforce by approximately 500 to 600 employees during the first quarter of 2007. We intend to reinvest the bulk of the savings from the plan back into the CRM business to create a strong, competitive pipeline that will help grow revenue that, combined with expense controls, should lead to increased profitability. The reinvestment will include additional hiring within the research and development function where there were shortages of desired skills.
 
We continue to be focused on examining our operations in order to identify cost improvement measures and reallocate resources to support growth initiatives.
 
At December 31, 2006, we had total outstanding debt of $8.902 billion, related primarily to the Guidant acquisition, cash of $1.668 billion and working capital of $2.271 billion. We continued to generate strong operating cash flow during 2006. W e expect to use a portion of our operating cash flow to reduce our outstanding debt obligations over the next several years; our first upcoming debt maturity is in April 2008 for $650 million.    
 
FDA Warning Letters

On January 26, 2006, legacy Boston Scientific received a corporate warning letter from the FDA, notifying us of serious regulatory problems at three facilities and advising us that our corrective action plan relating to three site-specific warning letters issued to us in 2005 was inadequate. As stated in this FDA warning letter, the FDA may not grant our requests for exportation certificates to foreign governments or approve pre-market approval (PMA) applications for class III devices to which the quality control or current good manufacturing practices deficiencies described in the letter are reasonably related until the deficiencies have been corrected. During 2005, in order to strengthen our corporate-wide quality controls, we launched Project Horizon , a corporate-wide cross-functional initiative to improve and harmonize our overall quality processes and systems. As part of Project Horizon, we have made   modifications to our process validation and complaint management systems. Pr oject Horizon has resulted in the reallocation of significant internal engineering and management resources to quality initiatives, as well as incremental spending. It also has resulted in adjustments to product launch schedules of certain products and the decision to discontinue certain other product lines over time.
 
In 2006, our Board of Directors created a Compliance and Quality Committee to monitor our compliance and quality initiatives. We believe we have identified solutions to the quality issues cited by the FDA, and we continue to make progress in transitioning our organization to implement those solutions. We communicate frequently and meet regularly with the FDA to apprise them of our progress. The FDA has communicated the need for us to complete substantially all remediation efforts before they will reinspect our facilities. We have engaged a third party to audit our enhanced quality systems in order to assess our corporate-wide compliance prior to reinspection by the FDA. We believe we will be ready for the third-party audit in the second quarter of 2007.

On December 23, 2005, Guidant received an FDA warning letter citing certain deficiencies with respect to its manufacturing quality systems and record-keeping procedures in its CRM facility in St. Paul, Minnesota. This FDA warning letter followed an inspection by the FDA that was completed on September 1, 2005 and cited a number of observations. Guidant received a follow-up letter from the FDA dated January 5, 2006. As stated in this follow-up letter, until we have corrected the identified deficiencies, the FDA may not grant requests for exportation certificates to foreign governments or approve PMA applications for class III devices to which the deficiencies described are reasonably related. The FDA conducted a further inspection of the CRM facility between December 15, 2005 and February 9, 2006 and made one additional inspectional observation. The FDA has concluded its reinspection of our CRM facilities. While we believe this reinspection went well, we may be required to take additional actions in order to comply with any FDA observations that we may receive.

Outlook

Guidant Acquisition

On April 21, 2006, we consummated our acquisition of Guidant. With t his acquisition, we have become a major provider in the more than $9 billion global CRM business, enhancing our overall competitive position and long-term growth potential and further diversifying our product portfolio. The acquisition has established us as one of the world’s largest cardiovascular device companies and a global leader in microelectronic therapeutics.

The integration of Guidant’s operations and product lines with Boston Scientific’s is complex and time-consuming, and the separation of the Guidant businesses required by the Abbott transaction adds complexity to the transition process. We have entered transition services agreements with Abbott, under which Abbott and Boston Scientific provide or make available to each other certain services, rights, properties and assets for a temporary period. Many of these transition services agreements expire during 2007. The failure to integrate Boston Scientific and Guidant successfully and to manage the challenges presented by the transition process effectively, including the retention of key Guidant personnel and the
 
timely execution of activities under the transition services agreement, may reduce the anticipated potential benefits of the acquisition.

During 2007, we will continue to incur integration and restructuring costs as we integrate certain operations of Guidant. In January 2007, we announced our plan to reallocate certain CRM resources, including those in research and development as well as sales and marketing functions, to increase innovation, productivity and competitiveness, and to enhance our ability to deliver new products to physicians and their patients. This plan resulted in a reduction of our CRM workforce by approximately 500 to 600 employees during the first quarter of 2007. There can be no assurances that we will realize efficiencies related to the integration of the businesses sufficient to offset incremental transaction, acquisition-related, integration and restructuring costs over time.

Net sales from our CRM and Cardiac Surgery businesses were $1.503 billion for 2006, including $1.371 billion of CRM sales and $132 million of Cardiac Surgery sales. On a pro forma basis, assuming a full year of results, CRM sales were $2.026 billion in 2006 as compared to $2.28 billion in 2005. The decline, on a pro forma basis, was a result of lower average market shares for the Guidant devices in 2006 relative to 2005. We believe the lower market share, as well as reduced market growth rates, was due primarily to previous field actions in the industry. These field actions included Guidant’s decision announced on June 24, 2005 to stop selling Guidant’s leading defibrillator systems temporarily, which were returned to the market beginning on August 2, 2005. In addition, on June 26, 2006, we announced that we were retrieving a specific subset of pacemakers, cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers and ICDs due to a supplier’s low-voltage capacitor not performing consistently. We believe that these field actions contributed to our CRM division having a lower market share for ICDs and pacemaker systems for 2006 as compared to 2005.
 
The worldwide CRM market growth rates, including the U.S. defibrillator market, declined during the first three quarters of 2006; these growth levels are below those experienced in recent years. The U.S. defibrillator market represents approximately half of the worldwide CRM market. During the fourth quarter of 2006, we experienced a 10 percent sequential increase in net sales from our CRM business and a 13 percent increase for U.S. ICD sales, which we believe is a sign that our market share has increased and the CRM market is stabilizing and will return to growth. We expect that growth rates in the worldwide CRM market, and the U.S. ICD market, will recover over several years. However, there can be no assurance that these markets will return to their historical growth rates or that we will be able to regain CRM market share or increase net sales in a timely manner, if at all. The most significant variables that may impact the size of the CRM market and our position within this market include:
  • future product recalls or new physician advisories by us or our competitors;
  • our ability to resolve the issues identified in the CRM warning letter to the satisfaction of the FDA;
  • variations in clinical results, reliability or product performance of our and our competitors’ products;
  • our ability to retain our sales force and other key personnel;
  • our ability to reestablish the trust and confidence of the implanting community, the referring community and prospective patients in our technology;
  • delayed or limited regulatory approvals;
 
40

  • our ability to launch next-generation products and technology features in a timely manner, if at all;
  • international economic and regulatory conditions;
  • new competitive launches;
  • unfavorable reimbursement policies;
  • declines in average selling prices;
  • the overall number of procedures performed; and
  • the outcome of legal proceedings related to our CRM business.
We remain focused on our market share recovery and intend to accelerate recovery by regaining the trust and confidence of the implanting community, the referring community and prospective patients; continuing to improve our quality systems; investing in new technologies and clinical trials; retaining our sales force and other key personnel; continuing research and development productivity; and improving physician and patient communication. However, if these efforts are not successful, and the CRM market does not recover according to our expectations, or we are unable to regain market share and net sales on a timely basis, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Coronary Stent Business

Coronary stent revenue represented approximately 32 percent of our consolidated net sales for 2006, as compared to 43 percent in 2005, primarily as a result of the Guidant acquisition. We estimate that the worldwide coronary stent market approximated $6 billion in 2006, and estimate that drug-eluting stents represented approximately 90 percent of the dollar value of the worldwide coronary stent market in 2006. The U.S. drug-eluting stent market for 2006 approximated $3 billion. Our U.S. TAXUS sales declined to $1.561 billion for 2006 as compared to $1.763 billion for 2005 . Recent uncertainty regarding the risk of late stent thrombosis following the use of drug-eluting stents contributed to a decline in the U.S. stent market size. In addition to the decline in U.S. drug-eluting stent market penetration, device utilization per procedure and overall percutaneous coronary intervention volume has decreased likely due to market conservatism. We believe this conservatism is a temporary circumstance that, if alleviated, may lead to an increase in future procedural volume and usage of drug-eluting stents. In the fourth quarter of 2006, the FDA held a special ad visory panel meeting to discuss drug-eluting stents. Members of the panel concluded that drug-eluting stents remain safe and effective when used as indicated, and that the benefits outweigh the risks. We believe that percutaneous coronary interventions, device utilization per procedure and drug-eluting stent penetration rates will increase in the future, and result in a market recovery; however, there can be no assurance that this will happen or that the market will recover to previous levels. We expect that our U.S. drug-eluting stent sales in 2007 may be below those experienced in 2006.

During 2006, our international TAXUS stent system net sales remained consistent with 2005. Drug-eluting stent penetration rates increased during the first half of 2006, and remained relatively flat throughout the second half of 2006 and exiting 2006, the effect of which offset declines in our market share associated with several competitive launches of new drug-eluting stent products in our Europe and Inter-Continental markets. We expect competitive launches in these geographies to continue to put pressure on our market share and average selling prices in 2007. In addition, we expect that drug-eluting stent penetration rates will remain relatively consistent in our Europe and Inter-Continental markets during 2007 due primarily to concerns regarding the risk of late stent thrombosis. Subject to regulatory
 
approval, we expect to launch our TAXUS Express 2 stent system in Japan during the second half of 2007, where we estimate a drug-eluting stent market size exceeding $500 million.

Historically, the worldwide coronary stent market has been dynamic and highly competitive with significant market share volatility. In addition, in the ordinary course of our business, we conduct and participate in numerous clinical trials with a variety of study designs, patient populations and trial end points. Unfavorable or inconsistent clinical data from existing or future clinical trials conducted by us, by our competitors or by third parties, or the market’s perception of this clinical data, may adversely impact our position in and share of the drug-eluting stent market and may contribute to increased volatility in the market.
 
However, we believe that we can maintain a leadership position within the drug-eluting stent markets in which we compete for a variety of reasons, including:
  • the results of our TAXUS clinical trials;
  • the performance benefits of our current technology;
  • the strength of our pipeline of drug-eluting stent products and the planned launch sequence of these products;
  • our overall market leadership in interventional medicine and our sizeable interventional cardiology sales force;
  • our significant investments in our sales, clinical, marketing and manufacturing capabilities; and
  • our second drug-eluting stent platform obtained as a result of our Guidant acquisition.
However, a material decline in our drug-eluting stent revenue would have a significant adverse impact on our future operating results. The most significant variables that may impact the size of the drug-eluting coronary stent market and our position within this market include:
  • continued concerns regarding the risk of late stent thrombosis;
  • the entry of additional competitors in international markets and the U.S.;
  • continued physician and patient confidence in our technology and attitudes toward drug-eluting stents;
  • our ability to resolve the issues identified in the current legacy Boston Scientific corporate warning letter to the satisfaction of the FDA;
  • declines in the average selling prices of drug-eluting stent systems;
  • variations in clinical results or product performance of our and our competitors’ products;
  • delayed or limited regulatory approvals;
  • the overall number of procedures performed;
  • unfavorable reimbursement policies;
42

  • intellectual property litigation;
  • the average number of stents used per procedure;
  • our ability to maintain and expand indications for use;
  • our ability to launch next-generation products and technology features;
  • the international adoption rate of drug-eluting stent technology;
  • international economic and regulatory conditions; and
  • the level of supply of our drug-eluting stent systems and competitive stent systems.
The TAXUS drug-eluting stent system is currently one of only two drug-eluting products in the U.S. market. Our share of the drug-eluting stent market, as well as unit prices, may be adversely impacted as additional significant competitors enter the drug-eluting stent market, which could occur as early as the second half of 2007 in the U.S.

Prior to our acquisition of Guidant, Abbott acquired Guidant’s vascular intervention and endovascular solutions businesses and agreed to share the drug-eluting technology it acquired from Guidant with Boston Scientific, including the XIENCE™ V everolimus-eluting coronary stent system. In October of 2006, we received CE mark approval to begin marketing the PROMUS™ stent system, which is a private-labeled XIENCE V drug-eluting coronary stent system supplied to us by Abbott. During the fourth quarter of 2006, we initiated a limited launch of the PROMUS stent system in certain European countries. We expect to launch the PROMUS stent system in certain Inter-Continental countries in the second quarter of 2007 and in the U.S. in 2008, subject to regulatory approval. Under the terms of our supply arrangement with Abbott, the profit margin of a PROMUS stent system will be significantly lower than our TAXUS drug-eluting stent. Therefore, the mix of PROMUS stent system revenue relative to our total drug-eluting stent revenue could have a negative impact on our overall profitability as a percentage of revenue. In addition, we will incur incremental costs and expend incremental resources in order to develop and commercialize products utilizing the Guidant drug-eluting stent system technology and to support the launch of our internally manufactured everolimus-eluting stent system in the future, which we expect will have profit margins more comparable to our TAXUS stent system.

Regulatory Compliance

In January 2006, legacy Boston Scientific received a corporate warning letter from the FDA, notifying us of serious regulatory problems at three facilities. During 2005, in order to strengthen our corporate-wide quality controls, we launched Project Horizon, which has resulted in the reallocation of significant internal engineering and management resources to quality initiatives, as well as incremental spending. It also has resulted in adjustments to product launch schedules of certain products and the decision to discontinue certain other product lines over time. See the FDA Warning Letters section above for further information regarding the FDA warning letters.

There can be no assurances regarding the length of time or cost it will take us to resolve these issues to the satisfaction of the FDA. Our inability to resolve these issues in a timely manner may further delay product launch schedules, including the U.S. launch of our TAXUS Liberté stent, which may weaken our competitive position in the markets in which we participate. If our remedial actions are not satisfactory to the FDA, we may have to devote additional financial and human resources to our efforts, and the FDA may take further regulatory actions against us, including, but not limited to, seizing our product inventory,
 
obtaining a court injunction against further marketing of our products, issuing a consent decree or assessing civil monetary penalties.

Intellectual Property Litigation 

There continues to be significant intellectual property litigation in the coronary stent market. We are currently involved in a number of legal proceedings with our existing competitors, including Johnson & Johnson and Medtronic, Inc. There can be no assurance that an adverse outcome in one or more of these proceedings would not impact our ability to meet our objectives in the market. See Note J - Commitments and Contingencies   to our 2006 consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for a description of these legal proceedings.

Innovation

Our approach to innovation combines internally developed products and technologies with those we obtain externally through our strategic acquisitions and alliances. Our research and development program is largely focused on the development of next-generation and novel technology offerings across multiple programs and divisions. As a result of our agreement with Abbott, we now have access to a second drug-eluting stent program, which will complement our existing TAXUS   stent system program. We expect to continue to invest in our paclitaxel drug-eluting stent program, along with our internally manufactured everolimus-eluting stent program, to continue to sustain our worldwide drug-eluting stent market leadership position. During 2007, we expect to incur incremental capital expenditures and research and development expenses as a result of our dual drug-eluting stent program. We successfully launched our next-generation drug-eluting stent product, the TAXUS Liberté stent system, during 2005 in our Europe and Inter-Continental markets. We expect to launch our TAXUS Liberté stent system in the U.S., subject to regulatory approval. In addition, we expect to continue to invest in our CRM technologies, including our LATITUDE ® Patient Management System, which is technology that enables physicians to monitor device performance remotely while patients remain in their homes, and the Frontier CRM technology, our next-generation pulse generator platform . In October 2006, the FDA approved expansion of our LATITUDE System to be used for remote monitoring in certain existing ICDs and cardiac resynchronization defibrillators. We also expect to invest selectively in areas outside of drug-eluting stent and CRM technologies. There can be no assurance that these technologies will achieve technological feasibility, obtain regulatory approval or gain market acceptance. A delay in the development or approval of these technologies may adversely impact our future growth.

Our acquisitions and alliances are intended to expand further our ability to offer our customers effective, high-quality medical devices that satisfy their interventional needs. Management believes it has developed a sound plan to integrate acquired businesses. However, our failure to integrate these businesses successfully could impair our ability to realize the strategic and financial objectives of these transactions. Potential future acquisitions, including companies with whom we currently have strategic alliances or options to purchase, or the fulfillment of our contingent consideration obligations may be dilutive to our earnings and may require additional debt or equity financing, depending on their size and nature. Further, in connection with these acquisitions and other strategic alliances, we have acquired numerous in-process research and development projects. As we continue to undertake strategic growth initiatives, it is reasonable to assume that we will acquire additional in-process research and development projects.

In addition, we have entered a significant number of strategic alliances with privately held and publicly traded companies. Many of these alliances involve equity investments and often give us the option to acquire the other company or assets of the other company in the future. We enter these strategic alliances to broaden our product technology portfolio and to strengthen and expand our reach into existing and new markets. The success of these alliances is an element of our growth strategy and we will continue to seek
 
market opportunities and growth through selective strategic alliances and acquisitions. However, the full benefit of these alliances is often dependent on the strength of the other companies’ underlying technology and ability to execute. An inability to achieve regulatory approvals and launch competitive product offerings, or litigation related to these technologies, among other factors, may prevent us from realizing the benefit of these alliances.

Even though we believe that the drug-eluting stent market and CRM market will recover above existing levels, there can be no assurance to the timing or extent of this recovery. In 2007, we will continue to reprioritize our internal research and development project portfolio and our external investment portfolio primarily based on expectations of future market growth. This reprioritization may result in our decision to sell, discontinue, write-down, or otherwise reduce the funding of certain projects, operations, investments or assets. Any proceeds from sales, or any increases in operating cash flows, resulting from such management actions may be used to reduce debt or may be reinvested in other research and development projects or other operational initiatives. 

Reimbursement and Funding

Our products are purchased by hospitals, doctors and other healthcare providers who are reimbursed by third-party payors, such as governmental programs (e.g., Medicare and Medicaid), private insurance plans and managed-care programs, for the healthcare services provided to their patients. Third-party payors may provide or deny coverage for certain technologies and associated procedures based on assessment criteria as determined by the third-party payor. Reimbursement by third-party payors for these services is based on a wide range of methodologies that may reflect the services’ assessed resource costs, clinical outcomes and economic value. These reimbursement methodologies confer different, and often conflicting, levels of financial risk and incentives to healthcare providers and patients, and these methodologies are subject to frequent refinements. There is no way of predicting the outcome of reimbursement decisions, or their impact on our operating results. Third-party payors are also increasingly adjusting reimbursement rates and challenging the prices charged for medical products and services. There can be no assurance that our products will be automatically covered by third-party payors, that reimbursement will be available or, if available, that the third-party payors’ coverage policies will not adversely affect our ability to sell our products profitably.  

International Markets

International markets are also being affected by economic pressure to contain reimbursement levels and healthcare costs. Our sales growth and profitability from our international operations may be limited by risks and uncertainties related to economic conditions in these regions, currency fluctuations, regulatory and reimbursement approvals, competitive offerings, infrastructure development, rights to intellectual property and our ability to implement our overall business strategy. Any significant changes in the competitive, political, regulatory, reimbursement or economic environment where we conduct international operations may have a material impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
 
In addition, we are required to receive or renew regulatory approvals and obtain exportation certificates to foreign governments in order to market our products in certain international jurisdictions. These approvals and certificates could be impacted by the FDA warning letters we have received. If these approvals and certificates are not renewed or obtained on a timely basis, our ability to market our full line of existing products within these jurisdictions may be limited, which could have a material adverse impact on our business.
 
Results of Operations
 
Net Sales
 
The following table provides our net sales by region and the relative change on an as reported and constant currency basis:
               
2006 versus 2005
 
2005 versus 2004
 
(in millions)
 
2006
 
2005
 
2004
 
As Reported
Currency
Basis
 
Constant
Currency
Basis
 
As Reported
Currency
Basis
 
Constant
Currency
Basis
 
                               
United States
 
$
4,840
 
$
3,852
 
$
3,502
   
26
%
 
26
%
 
10
%
 
10
%
                                             
Europe
   
1,574
   
1,161
   
994
   
36
%
 
34
%
 
17
%
 
17
%
Japan
   
594
   
579
   
613
   
3
%
 
8
%
 
(6
%)
 
(4
%)
Inter-Continental
   
813
   
691
   
515
   
18
%
 
16
%
 
34
%
 
28
%
International
   
2,981
   
2,431
   
2,122
   
23
%
 
22
%
 
15
%
 
13
%
                                             
Worldwide
 
$
7,821
 
$
6,283
 
$
5,624
   
24
%
 
24
%
 
12
%
 
11
%
 
 
The following table provides our worldwide net sales by division and the relative change on an as reported basis:
(in millions)
 
2006
 
2005
 
2004
 
2006 versus 2005
 
2005 versus 2004
 
                       
Interventional Cardiology
 
$
3,612
 
$
3,783
 
$
3,451
   
(5
%)
 
10
%
Peripheral Interventions/ Vascular Surgery
   
666
   
715
   
656
   
(7
%)
 
9
%
Electrophysiology
   
134
   
132
   
130
   
2
%
 
2
%
Neurovascular
   
326
   
277
   
253
   
18
%
 
9
%
Cardiac Surgery
   
132
   
N/A
   
N/A
   
N/A
   
N/A
 
Cardiac Rhythm Management
   
1,371
   
N/A
   
N/A
   
N/A
   
N/A
 
Cardiovascular
   
6,241
   
4,907
   
4,490
   
27
%
 
9
%
                                 
Oncology
   
221
   
207
   
186
   
7
%
 
11
%
Endoscopy
   
754
   
697
   
641
   
8
%
 
9
%
Urology
   
371
   
324
   
261
   
15
%
 
24
%
Endosurgery
   
1,346
   
1,228
   
1,088
   
10
%
 
13
%
                                 
Neuromodulation
   
234
   
148
   
46
   
58
%
 
222
%
                                 
Worldwide
 
$
7,821
 
$
6,283
 
$
5,624
   
24
%
 
12
%
 
We manage our international operating regions and divisions on a constant currency basis, while market risk from currency exchange rate changes is managed at the corporate level. The relative change on a constant currency basis by division approximated the change on an as reported basis. To calculate regional and divisional revenue growth rates that exclude the impact of currency exchange, we convert actual current-period net sales from local currency to U.S. dollars using constant currency exchange rates.
 
 
U.S. Net Sales
 
In 2006, our U.S. net sales increased by $988 million, or 26 percent, as compared to 2005. The increase is related primarily to the inclusion of $1.025 billion of U.S. net sales from our new CRM and Cardiac Surgery divisions. In addition, we experienced increases in our U.S. net sales related to sales growth of $83 million from our Endosurgery group and $75 million from our Neuromodulation division. Offsetting this increase were declines in our U.S. net sales of TAXUS coronary stent systems to $1.561 billion for 2006 as compared to $1.763 billion for 2005 and sales decreases of approximately $70 million in 2006 as compared to 2005 due to the expiration during the first quarter of 2006 of our agreement to distribute certain third-party guidewire and sheath products. The decline in TAXUS sales was due principally to a decrease in the U.S. drug-eluting stent market size and a decline in average TAXUS market share in 2006 relative to 2005. The drug-eluting stent market decline was due to recent uncertainty regarding the risk of late stent thrombosis following the use of drug-eluting stents, which resulted in conservative usage by physicians. The overall size of the U.S. drug-eluting stent market is driven primarily by the number of percutaneous coronary interventional procedures performed; the number of devices used per procedure; the drug-eluting stent penetration rate or mix between bare metal and drug-eluting stents across procedures; and average drug-eluting stent selling prices. The primary reason for the decline in the U.S. drug-eluting stent market size was lower penetration rates in 2006 relative to 2005. Exiting 2005, the percentage of drug-eluting stents used in U.S. interventional procedures were in the high 80 percent range, as compared to U.S. drug-eluting stent market penetration rates in the low 70 percent range exiting 2006. The drug-eluting stent market also declined due to decreases in the number of devices used per procedure and slight reductions in average selling prices. Our drug-eluting stent market share declined throughout the first three quarters of 2005, but has been stable during 2006. See the Outlook section for a more detailed discussion of the drug-eluting stent market and our position within that market.
 
In 2005, our U.S. net sales increased by $350 million, or 10 percent, as compared to 2004. The increase resulted largely from a full year of TAXUS stent system sales, which we launched in March 2004. U.S. TAXUS stent system sales for 2005 were $1.763 billion as compared to $1.57 billion for 2004, offset by a reduction in market share compared to the prior year. The remainder of the increase in our U.S. net sales related to sales growth of $83 million from our Endosurgery group and $75 million from our Neuromodulation division.
 
International Net Sales
 
In 2006, our international net sales increased by $550 million, or 23 percent, as compared to 2005. The increase related primarily to the inclusion of $478 million of international net sales from our new CRM and Cardiac Surgery divisions. The remainder of the increase in our revenue in these markets was due to growth in various product franchises, including $35 million in net sales from our Endosurgery group and $27 million in sales growth from our Neurovascular division. TAXUS stent system sales in our Europe and Inter-Continental markets were $797 million in 2006 as compared to $793 million in 2005. TAXUS stent system sales were favorably impacted by drug-eluting stent penetration rates in these markets. The drug-eluting stent penetration rates increased during the first half of 2006, and remained relatively flat throughout the second half of 2006 and exiting 2006. Market share declines associated with several competitors having launched new drug-eluting stent products in these markets offset the favorable impact of increased penetration rates.
 
In 2006, our legacy Boston Scientific net sales in Japan, excluding the impact of currency fluctuations, were relatively consistent with the prior year. Due to the timing of regulatory approval for our TAXUS stent system and government-mandated pricing reductions for other products, we do not expect significant revenue growth in our legacy Japan business until we launch our TAXUS Express 2 stent system in Japan,
 
which we expect to occur during the second half of 2007. Japan net sales for 2006 included $62 million from CRM and Cardiac Surgery products.
 
In 2005, our international net sales increased by $309 million, or 15 percent, as compared to 2004. The increase related primarily to sales growth of our TAXUS stent system by $220 million, or 38 percent, in our Europe and Inter-Continental markets. This increase in TAXUS stent system sales in these markets was primarily the result of increased market penetration rates, as well as the successful launch of our TAXUS Liberté stent system during 2005. The remainder of the increase in our revenue in these markets was due to growth in various product franchises, including $57 million in incremental sales from our Endosurgery group and $27 million in sales growth from our Neuromodulation division.
 
Gross Profit
 
The following table provides a summary of our gross profit:
 
   
2006
 
2005
 
2004
 
(in millions)
 
$
 
% of Net Sales
 
$
 
% of Net Sales
 
$
 
% of Net Sales
 
Gross profit
   
5,614
   
71.8
   
4,897
   
77.9
   
4,332
   
77.0
 
 
In 2006, our gross profit, as a percentage of net sales, decreased by 6.1 percentage points as compared to 2005. Our gross profit for 2006 decreased as a percentage of net sales by 3.8 percentage points as compared to 2005 due to costs associated with Guidant, including $267 million in step-up value of acquired Guidant inventory sold during the period and a $31 million charge associated with making our LATITUDE Patient Management System available to many of our existing CRM patients without additional charge. In connection with the accounting for the Guidant acquisition, we wrote up inventory acquired from manufacturing cost to fair value. As of December 31, 2006, we had no inventory step-up value remaining in inventory. In addition, our gross profit for 2006 decreased as a percentage of net sales by approximately 2.0 percentage points as compared to 2005 due to period expenses, including costs associated with Project Horizon and certain inventory charges. Shifts in our product sales mix toward lower margin products, including CRM products and lower sales of TAXUS stents in the U.S., decreased our gross profit as a percentage of net sales by 0.8 percentage points. These decreases were offset by a 0.8 percentage point increase due to the favorable change in currency exchange rates on our gross profit.
 
In 2005, our gross profit, as a percentage of net sales, increased by 0.9 percentage points as compared to 2004. Our 2004 gross profit decreased by approximately 1.0 percentage points due to $57 million in inventory write-downs, including a $43 million write-down attributable to recalls of certain of our coronary stent systems and a $14 million write-down of TAXUS stent inventory due to shelf-life dating. In addition, shifts in our product sales mix toward higher margin products, primarily TAXUS stents, increased our gross profit as a percentage of net sales by 0.6 percentage points. Our gross profit for 2005 was reduced as a percentage of net sales by 0.9 percentage points related to period expenses, including manufacturing start-up costs primarily associated with our TAXUS Liberté stent system and increased investment in quality initiatives. The remaining fluctuation in gross profit as a percentage of net sales primarily related to the favorable change in currency exchange rates.
 
Operating Expenses
 
Our operating expenses, excluding purchased research and development and litigation-related charges, increased $1.571 billion to $4.444 billion in 2006 from $2.873 billion in 2005. Of this increase, $1.299 billion related to operating expenses associated with the Guidant business. The significant increase in
 
each of our operating expense categories is primarily a result of Guidant operating expenses. The following table provides a summary of our operating expenses, excluding purchased research and development and litigation-related charges:
   
2006
 
2005
 
2004
 
(in millions)
 
$
 
% of Net Sales
 
$
 
% of Net Sales
 
$
 
% of Net Sales
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses
   
2,675
   
34.2
   
1,814
   
28.9
   
1,742
   
31.0
 
Research and development expenses
   
1,008
   
12.9
   
680
   
10.8
   
569
   
10.1
 
Royalty expense
   
231
   
3.0
   
227
   
3.6
   
195
   
3.5
 
Amortization expense
   
530
   
6.8
   
152
   
2.4
   
112
   
2.0
 
 
Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A) Expenses
 
In 2006, our SG&A expenses increased by $861 million, or 47 percent, as compared to 2005. As a percentage of our net sales, SG&A expenses increased to 34.2 percent in 2006 from 28.9 percent for the same period in the prior year. The increase in our SG&A expenses related primarily to: $670 million in expenditures associated with Guidant; $65 million of acquisition-related costs associated primarily with certain Guidant integration and retention programs; increases of $63 million due primarily to increased headcount attributable to the expansion of our sales force within our international regions and Neuromodulation division; and $55 million in incremental stock-based compensation expense associated with the adoption of Statement No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment . See the Critical Accounting Policies section and Note L - Stock Ownership Plans for a more detailed discussion of Statement No. 123(R). SG&A expenses for 2005 included $21 million in costs related to certain business optimization initiatives and $17 million in costs related to certain retirement benefits.

In 2005, our SG&A expenses increased by $72 million, or four percent, as compared to 2004. The increase primarily related to: approximately $100 million in increased headcount and higher compensation expense mainly attributable to the expansion of the sales force within our Interventional Cardiology business unit and Endosurgery group and costs related to market development initiatives; $75 million in incremental operating expenses associated with our 2004 and 2005 acquisitions, primarily Advanced Bionics; $21 million in costs related to certain business optimization initiatives; $19 million in stock-based compensation expense associated primarily with the issuance of deferred stock units in 2005; and $17 million in costs related to certain retirement benefits. Certain charges incurred in 2004 partially offset these increases, including a $110 million enhancement to our 401(k) Plan, and a $90 million non-cash charge resulting from certain modifications to our stock option plans. As a percentage of our net sales, SG&A expenses decreased to 28.9 percent in 2005 from 31.0 percent in 2004 primarily due to the increase in our net sales in 2005.
 
Research and Development (R&D) Expenses
 
Our investment in R&D reflects spending on regulatory compliance and clinical research as well as new product development programs. In 2006, our R&D expenses increased by $328 million, or 48 percent, as compared to 2005. As a percentage of our net sales, R&D expenses increased to 12.9 percent in 2006 from 10.8 percent in 2005. The increase primarily related to: the inclusion of $270 million in expenditures associated with Guidant; approximately $30 million in costs related to the cancellation of the TriVascular AAA program; $24 million of stock-based compensation expense associated with the adoption of Statement No. 123(R); and $13 million of acquisition-related costs associated with certain Guidant
 
integration and retention programs. See the Purchased Research and Development section for further discussion regarding the cancellation of our TriVascular AAA stent-graft program.
 
In 2005, our R&D expenses increased by $111 million, or 20 percent, as compared to 2004. As a percentage of net sales, R&D expenses increased to 10.8 percent in 2005 from 10.1 percent in 2004. The increase related primarily to an increased investment of approximately $60 million in incremental R&D expense attributable to our 2004 and 2005 acquisitions, primarily Advanced Bionics and TriVascular. In addition, we increased spending on internal R&D projects within our Endosurgery group by $25 million.
 
Royalty Expense
 
In 2006, our royalty expense increased by $4 million, or 2 percent, as compared to 2005. The increase was due to $25 million of royalty expense associated with the CRM and Cardiac Surgery products that we acquired as part of the Guidant acquisition. This increase was offset by a decrease in royalty expense attributable to sales of our TAXUS stent system by $20 million to $153 million for 2006 as compared to the prior year due primarily to lower sales volume. As a percentage of net sales, royalty expense decreased to 3.0 percent in 2006 from 3.6 percent in 2005. This decrease was primarily a result of the inclusion of net sales from our new CRM and Cardiac Surgery products, which on average have a lower royalty cost relative to legacy Boston Scientific net sales.
 
In 2005, our royalty expense increased by $32 million, or 16 percent, as compared to 2004. As a percentage of net sales, royalty expense increased to 3.6 percent in 2005 from 3.5 percent in 2004. The increase in our royalty expense related to sales growth of royalty-bearing products, primarily sales of our TAXUS stent system. Royalty expense attributable to sales of our TAXUS stent system increased by $27 million to $174 million for 2005 as compared to 2004.
 
Amortization Expense
 
In 2006, our amortization expense increased by $378 million, or 249 percent, as compared to 2005. As a percentage of our net sales, amortization expense increased to 6.8 percent in 2006 from 2.4 percent in 2005. The increase in our amortization expense related primarily to: $334 million of amortization of intangible assets obtained as part of the Guidant acquisition; $23 million for the write-off of intangible assets due to the cancellation of the TriVascular AAA program; $21 million for the write-off of the intangible assets associated with developed technology obtained as part of our 2005 acquisition of Rubicon Medical Corporation; and $12 million for the write-off of the intangible assets associated with our Real-time Position Management System (RPM) technology, a discontinued technology platform obtained as part of our acquisition of Cardiac Pathways Corporation. The write-off of the RPM intangible assets resulted from our decision to cease investment in the technology. The write-off of the Rubicon developed technology resulted from our decision to redesign the first generation of the technology and concentrate resources on the development and commercialization of the next-generation product. We do not expect these program cancellations and related write-offs to impact our future operations or cash flows materially. Amortization expense for 2005 included a $10 million write-off of intangible assets related to our Enteryx ® Liquid Polymer Technology, a discontinued technology platform obtained as a part of our acquisition of Enteric Medical Technologies, Inc.. The write-off resulted from our decision during 2005 to cease selling the Enteryx product.
 
In 2005, our amortization expense increased by $40 million, or 36 percent, as compared to 2004. As a percentage of our net sales, amortization expense increased to 2.4 percent in 2005 from 2.0 percent in 2004. The increase in our amortization expense was due primarily to $25 million in incremental amortization expense from the intangible assets obtained in conjunction with our 2004 and 2005
 
acquisitions, primarily Advanced Bionics. In addition, amortization expense included a $10 million write-off of intangible assets related to Enteryx.
 
Interest Expense
 
Our interest expense increased to $435 million in 2006 as compared to $90 million in 2005. The increase in our interest expense related primarily to an increase in our average debt levels used to finance the Guidant acquisition, as well as an increase in our weighted-average borrowing cost. Our average debt levels for 2006 increased to approximately $7.2 billion as compared to approximately $2.4 billion for 2005. Our weighted-average borrowing cost for 2006 increased to 6.1 percent from 3.8 percent for 2005. At December 31, 2006, $5.886 billion, or 81 percent, of our approximately $7.234 billion in outstanding net debt is at fixed interest rates.
 
Our interest expense increased to $90 million in 2005 from $64 million in 2004. The increase in 2005 as compared to 2004 related primarily to an increase in average market interest rates on our borrowings.
 
Fair Value Adjustment

During 2006, we recorded net expense of $95 million to reflect the change in fair value related to the sharing of proceeds feature of the Abbott stock purchase, which is discussed in further detail at Note D- Business Combinations to our 2006 consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K . This sharing of proceeds feature is being marked-to-market through earnings based upon changes in our stock price, among other factors.
 
Other, net
 
Our other, net reflected expense of $56 million in 2006, income of $13 million in 2005 and expense of $16 million in 2004. Our other, net included investment write-downs of $121 million in 2006, $17 million in 2005 and $58 million in 2004, in each case attributable to an other-than-temporary decline in fair value of certain strategic alliances. These write-downs were partially offset by realized gains on investments of $9 million in 2006, $4 million in 2005 and $36 million in 2004. Our write-downs during 2006 included charges of $34 million associated with investment write-downs due primarily to the termination of a gene therapy trial being conducted by one of our portfolio companies. In addition, we recorded $27 million of investment write-downs related to one of our vascular sealing portfolio companies due to continued delays in its technology development and the resulting deterioration in its financial condition. The remaining investment write-downs were not individually significant. We do not expect these write-downs to impact our future operations or cash flows materially. In addition, our other, net included interest income of $67 million in 2006, $36 million in 2005 and $20 million in 2004. Our interest income increased in 2006 as compared to 2005 due primarily to increases in our cash and cash equivalents balances and increases in average market interest rates. Our interest income in 2005 increased as compared to 2004 due to increases in average market interest rates.
 
Tax Rate
 
The following table provides a summary of our reported tax rate:
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
Percentage Point
Increase (Decrease)
 
 
 
2006
 
2005
 
2004
 
2006 versus 2005
 
2005 versus 2004
 
Reported tax rate
   
1.2%
 
 
29.5%
 
 
28.9%
 
 
(28.3)
 
 
0.6
 
Impact of certain charges
   
(20.2 %)
 
5.5%
 
 
4.9%
 
 
(25.7)
 
 
0.6
 
 
In 2006, the decrease in our reported tax rate as compared to 2005 related primarily to the impact of certain charges during 2006 that are taxed at different rates than our effective tax rate. These charges include: purchased research and development; asset write-downs; reversal of taxes associated with unremitted earnings; and tax gain on the sale of intangible assets.
 
As of December 31, 2005, we had recorded a $133 million deferred tax liability for unremitted earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries that we had anticipated repatriating in the foreseeable future. During 2006, we made a significant acquisition that, when combined with certain changes in business conditions subsequent to the acquisition, resulted in a reevaluation of this liability. We have determined that we will not repatriate these earnings in the foreseeable future and, instead, we will indefinitely reinvest these earnings in foreign operations to repay debt obligations associated with the acquisition. As a result, we reversed the deferred tax liability and reduced income tax expense by $133 million in 2006.
 
We currently estimate that our 2007 effective tax rate, excluding certain charges, will be approximately 21 percent due primarily to our intention to reinvest offshore substantially all of our offshore earnings. However, acquisitions or dispositions in 2007 and geographic changes in the manufacture of our products may positively or negatively impact our effective tax rate.
 
In 2005, the increase in our reported tax rate as compared to 2004 related primarily to the impact of certain charges during 2005 that are taxed at different rates than our effective tax rate. These charges include: certain litigation-related charges; purchased research and development; asset write-downs and employee-related costs that resulted from certain business optimization initiatives; costs related to certain retirement benefits; and a tax adjustment associated with a technical correction made to the American Jobs Creation Act.
 
Litigation-Related Charges
 
In 2005, we recorded a $780 million pre-tax charge associated with the Medinol litigation settlement. On September 21, 2005, we reached a settlement with Medinol resolving certain contract and patent infringement litigation. In conjunction with the settlement agreement, we paid $750 million in cash and cancelled our equity investment in Medinol.
 
In 2004, we recorded a $75 million provision for certain legal and regulatory matters, which included a civil settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice, which we paid in 2005.
 
See further discussion of our material legal proceedings in Item 3. Legal Proceedings above and Note J — Commitments and Contingencies to our 2006 consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
 
Purchased Research and Development
 
During 2006, we recorded $4.119 billion of purchased research and development. This amount included a charge of approximately $4.169 billion associated with the purchased research and development obtained
 
in conjunction with the Guidant acquisition; a credit of approximately $67 million resulting primarily from the reversal of accrued contingent payments due to the cancellation of the TriVascular AAA program; and an expense of approximately $17 million resulting primarily from the application of equity method accounting for our investment in EndoTex Interventional Systems.

The $4.169 billion of purchased research and development associated with the Guidant acquisition consists primarily of approximately $3.26 billion for acquired CRM-related products and approximately $540 million for drug-eluting stent technology shared with Abbott. The purchased research and development value associated with the Guidant acquisition also includes approximately $369 million that represents the estimated fair value of the potential milestone payments of up to $500 million that we may receive from Abbott upon receipt of certain regulatory approvals by the vascular intervention and endovascular solutions businesses it acquired from Guidant. We recorded the amounts as purchased research and development at the acquisition date because the receipt of the payments is dependent on future research and development activity and regulatory approvals, and the asset has no alternative future use as of the acquisition date.

The most significant purchased research and development projects acquired from Guidant include the Frontier CRM technology  and rights to the everolimus-eluting stent technology that we share with Abbott. The Frontier CRM technology represents Guidant’s next-generation pulse generator platform that will incorporate new components and software while leveraging certain existing intellectual property, technology, manufacturing know-how and institutional knowledge of Guidant. We expect to leverage this platform across all CRM product lines to treat electrical dysfunction in the heart. We expect to launch various Frontier-based products commercially in the U.S. over the next 36 months, subject to regulatory approval. As of December 31, 2006, we estimate that the total costs to complete the Frontier CRM technology is between $150 million and $200 million. We expect material cash inflows from Frontier-based products to commence in 2008.

The $540 million attributable to the everolimus-eluting stent technology represents the estimated fair value of the rights to Guidant’s everolimus-based drug-eluting stent technology we share with Abbott. In December 2006, we launched PROMUS, our first-generation everolimus-based stent, supplied by Abbott, in limited quantities in Europe. We expect to launch a first-generation everolimus-eluting stent, supplied by Abbott, in the U.S. in 2008, subject to regulatory approval. We expect to launch an internally manufactured next-generation everolimus-based stent in Europe in 2010 and in the U.S. in 2011. We expect that material net cash inflows (net of operating costs, including research and development costs to complete) from our internally manufactured everolimus-based drug-eluting stent will commence in 2010 or 2011, following its approval in Europe and in the U.S. As of December 31, 2006, we estimate that the cost to complete the next-generation everolimus-eluting stent technology project is between $200 million and $250 million. The in-process projects acquired in conjunction with the Guidant acquisition are generally progressing in line with our estimates as of the acquisition date.

In 2005, we recorded $276 million of purchased research and development. Our 2005 purchased research and development consisted of: $130 million relating to our acquisition of TriVascular; $73 million relating to our acquisition of Advanced Stent Technologies, Inc. (AST); $45 million relating to our acquisition of Rubicon; and $3 million relating to our acquisition of CryoVascular Systems, Inc. In addition, we recorded $25 million of purchased research and development in conjunction with obtaining distribution rights for new brain monitoring technology that Aspect Medical Systems, one of our strategic partners, is currently developing. This technology is designed to aid the diagnosis and treatment of depression, Alzheimer’s disease and other neurological conditions.

The most significant 2005 purchased research and development projects included TriVascular’s AAA stent-graft and AST’s Petal™ bifurcation stent, which collectively represented 73 percent of our 2005
 
purchased research and development. During the second quarter of 2006, management cancelled the TriVascular AAA stent-graft program. The program cancellation was due principally to forecasted increases in time and costs to complete the development of the stent-graft and to receive regulatory approval. We do not expect the program cancellation and related write-downs to impact our future operations or cash flows materially. The cancellation of the TriVascular AAA program resulted in the shutdown of our facility in Santa Rosa, California and the displacement of approximately 300 employees. During 2006, we recorded a charge to research and development expenses of approximately $20 million associated primarily with write-downs of fixed assets and a charge to research and development expenses of approximately $10 million associated with severance and related costs incurred in connection with the cancellation of the TriVascular AAA program. In addition, we recorded an impairment charge related to the remaining TriVascular intangible assets and reversed our accrual for contingent payments recorded in the initial purchase accounting. The effect of the write-off of these assets and liabilities was a $23 million charge to amortization expense and a $67 million credit to purchased research and development during the second quarter of 2006. We completed substantially the shutdown activities during the third quarter of 2006.
 
AST’s Petal bifurcation stent is designed to expand into the side vessel where a single vessel branches into two vessels, permitting blood to flow into both branches of the bifurcation and providing support at the junction. We estimate the remaining cost to complete the Petal bifurcation stent to be between $100 million and $125 million. We expect material net cash inflows from the Petal bifurcation stent to begin in 2011, which is when we expect the stent to be commercially available in the U.S. in a drug-eluting configuration. The AST Petal bifurcation stent in-process project is generally progressing in line with our estimates as of the acquisition date.
 
In 2004, we recorded $65 million of purchased research and development. Our 2004 purchased research and development consisted primarily of $50 million relating to our acquisitions of Advanced Bionics and $14 million relating to our acquisition of Precision Vascular Systems, Inc. The most significant in-process projects acquired in connection with our 2004 acquisitions included Advanced Bionics’ bion ® microstimulator and drug delivery pump, which collectively represented 77 percent of our 2004 acquired in-process projects’ value. The bion microstimulator is an implantable neurostimulation device designed to treat a variety of neurological conditions. We estimate the remaining cost to complete the bion microstimulator for migraine headaches to be approximately $35 million. We expect material net cash inflows from the bion microstimulator to commence in 2011, following its approval in the U.S., which we expect to occur in 2010. The Advanced Bionics drug delivery pump is an implanted programmable device designed to treat chronic pain. We estimate the remaining cost to complete the drug delivery pump to be between $50 million and $60 million. We continue to assess the pace and risk of development of the drug delivery pump, as well as general market opportunities for the pump, which may result in a delay in the timing of regulatory approval or lower potential market value. We currently expect material net cash inflows from the drug delivery pump to commence in 2012, following its approval in the U.S., which we expect to occur in 2011 or 2012. The estimated timing and costs to complete the bion microstimulator and the drug delivery pump have increased relative to what we estimated as of the acquisition date; however, we do not believe these increases will have a material impact on our results of operations or financial condition.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
The following tables provide a summary of key performance indicators that we use to assess our liquidity and operating performance:
 
 
(in millions)
 
2006
 
2005
 
2004
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
1,668
 
$
689
 
$
1,296
 
Short-term marketable securities
         
159
   
344
 
Cash provided by operating activities
   
1,845
   
903
   
1,804
 
Cash used for investing activities
   
9,312
   
551
   
1,622
 
Cash provided by (used for) financing activities
   
8,439
   
(954
)
 
439
 
EBITDA 2
   
(2,273
)
 
1,278
   
1,904
 

(in millions)
 
2006
 
2005
   
Short-term debt
 
$
7
 
$
156
   
Long-term debt
   
8,895
   
1,864
   
Gross debt
   
8,902
   
2,020
   
Less: cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities
   
1,668
   
848
   
Net debt
 
$
7,234
 
$
1,172
   
 
Management uses EBITDA to assess operating performance and believes that it may assist users of our financial statements in analyzing the underlying trends in our business over time. Users of our financial statements should consider this non-GAAP financial information in addition to, not as a substitute for, or as superior to, financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP. Our EBITDA included pre-tax charges of $4.715 billion in 2006, $1.112 billion in 2005 and $340 million in 2004; see the Executive Summary section for a description of these charges.
 
Operating Activities
 
Cash generated by our operating activities continues to be a major source of funds for servicing our outstanding debt obligations and investing in our growth. The increase in cash generated by our operating activities in 2006 as compared to 2005 is attributable primarily to significant one-time payments made during 2005, consisting of: an approximate $75 million settlement payment made to the Department of Justice; a one-time $110 million 401(k) contribution; a cash settlement with Medinol of $750 million; and tax payments, including those associated with the American Jobs Creation Act. Cash paid for income taxes and interest was $423 million in 2006 and $437 million in 2005. We expect to make approximately $400 million in tax payments during the first quarter of 2007 associated primarily with the gain on the sale of Guidant’s vascular intervention and endovascular solutions businesses to Abbott.
_____________________________
2     The following represents a reconciliation between EBITDA and net (loss) income:
 
(in millions)
 
2006
 
2005
 
2004
 
EBITDA
 
$
(2,273
)
$
1,278
 
$
1,904
 
Interest income
   
67
   
36
   
20
 
Interest expense
   
(435
)
 
(90
)
 
(64
)
Income taxes
   
(42
)
 
(263
)
 
(432
)
Stock-based compensation expense
   
(113
)
 
(19
)
 
(91
)
Depreciation and amortization
   
(781
)
 
(314
)
 
(275
)
Net (loss) income
 
$
(3,577
)
$
628
 
$
1,062
 
 
Investing Activities
 
We made capital expenditures of $341 million in 2006 and 2005. Capital expenditures in 2006 included $107 million associated with our CRM and Cardiac Surgery divisions. Legacy Boston Scientific capital expenditures declined in 2006 compared to 2005 due to significant capital expenditures incurred in the prior year to enhance our manufacturing and distribution capabilities. We expect to incur capital expenditures of approximately $450 million during 2007, which includes a full year of capital expenditures for our CRM and Cardiac Surgery divisions; and capital expenditures to further upgrade our quality systems, to enhance our manufacturing capabilities in order to support a second drug-eluting stent platform, to facilitate the integration of Guidant and to support continuous growth in our business units, including our Neuromodulation division.
 
Our investing activities during 2006 included: $15.4 billion of cash payments for our acquisition of Guidant, including approximately $100 million associated with the buyout of options of certain former Guidant vascular intervention and endovascular solutions employees in connection with the sale of these businesses to Abbott, and approximately $800 million of direct acquisition costs; $6.7 billion of cash acquired from Guidant, including proceeds of $4.1 billion from Guidant’s sale of its vascular intervention and endovascular solutions businesses to Abbott; $397 million in contingent payments associated primarily with Advanced Bionics, CryoVascular and Smart Therapeutics, Inc.; and $65 million of net payments for strategic alliances with both privately held and publicly traded entities.

In January 2007, we acquired EndoTex, a developer of stents used in the treatment of stenotic lesions in the carotid arteries. In conjunction with the acquisition of EndoTex, we paid approximately $100 million, which included approximately five million shares of our common stock valued at approximately $90 million and cash of $10 million, in addition to our previous investments and notes issued of approximately $40 million, plus future consideration that is contingent upon EndoTex achieving certain performance-related milestones. We do not expect significant purchased research and development charges associated with this acquisition because EndoTex obtained FDA approval of its carotid stent system prior to acquisition.
 
Financing Activities
 
Our cash flows from financing activities reflect issuances and repayments of debt, payments for share repurchases and proceeds from stock issuances related to our equity incentive programs.
 
We had outstanding borrowings of $8.902 billion at December 31, 2006 at a weighted average interest rate of 6.03 percent as compared to outstanding borrowings of $2.02 billion at December 31, 2005 at a weighted average interest rate of 4.8 percent. During 2006, we received net proceeds from borrowings of $6.888 billion, which we used primarily to finance the cash portion of the Guidant acquisition. There were no amounts outstanding against our available credit lines of $2.35 billion at December 31, 2006.  See Note F - Borrowings and Credit Arrangements to our 2006 consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for specific details regarding our 2006 and 2005 debt transactions.

The debt maturity schedule for the significant components of our long-term debt as of December 31, 2006, is as follows:
 
   
Payments Due by Period
     
(in millions)
 
2008
 
2009
 
2010
 
2011
 
Thereafter
 
Total
 
Term loan
 
$
650
 
$
650
 
$
1,700
 
$
2,000
       
$
5,000
 
Abbott loan
                     
900
         
900
 
Senior notes
                     
850
 
$
2,200
   
3,050
 
   
$
650
 
$
650
 
$
1,700
 
$
3,750
 
$
2,200
 
$
8,950
 
 
We expect to use a portion of our operating cash flow to reduce our outstanding debt obligations over the next several years. We will continue to examine all of our operations in order to identify cost improvement measures that will better align operating expenses with expected revenue levels and reallocate resources to better support growth initiatives. In addition, we have the flexibility to sell certain non-strategic assets and implement other strategic initiatives, which may generate proceeds that would be available for debt repayment.

As of December 31, 2006, our credit ratings were BBB from Fitch Ratings; Baa3 from Moody’s Investor Service; and BBB from Standard & Poor’s Rating Services (S&P). These credit ratings are investment grade. The Moody’s and S&P ratings outlook is currently negative.
 
Our revolving credit facility and term loan agreement requires that we maintain a ratio of debt to pro forma EBITDA, as defined by the agreement, of less than or equal to 4.5 to 1.0 through December 31, 2007 and 3.5 to 1.0 thereafter. The agreement also requires that we maintain a ratio of pro forma EBITDA, as defined by the agreement, to interest expense of greater than or equal to 3.0 to 1.0. As of December 31, 2006, we were in compliance with both of these debt covenants. Exiting 2006, our ratio of debt to pro forma EBITDA was 3.6 to 1.0 and the ratio of pro forma EBITDA to interest expense was 5.6 to 1.0. Any breach of these covenants would require that we obtain waivers from our lenders and there can be no assurance that our lenders would grant such waivers. Our inability to obtain any necessary waivers, or to obtain them on reasonable terms, could have a material adverse impact on our operations.
 
Equity
 
In March 2006, we filed a new public registration statement with the SEC. During the first quarter of 2006, we increased our authorized common stock from 1.2 billion shares to 2.0 billion shares in anticipation of our acquisition of Guidant, and issued approximately 577 million shares to former Guidant shareholders in conjunction with the acquisition. In April 2006, we issued approximately 65 million shares of our common stock under this registration statement to Abbott for $1.4 billion. See Note D- Business Combinations   to our 2006 consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further details on the Guidant acquisition and Abbott transaction.
 
During 2006, we received $145 million in proceeds from stock issuances related to our stock option and employee stock purchase plans as compared to $94 million in 2005. Proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options and employee stock purchases vary from period to period based upon, among other factors, fluctuations in the exercise and stock purchase patterns of employees.
 
We did not repurchase any of our common stock during 2006. We repurchased approximately 25 million shares of our common stock at an aggregate cost of $734 million in 2005, and 10 million shares of our common stock at an aggregate cost of $360 million in 2004. Since 1992, we have repurchased approximately 132 million shares of our common stock and we have approximately 12 million shares of our common stock held in treasury at year-end. Approximately 37 million shares remain under our previous share repurchase authorizations.
 
Contractual Obligations and Commitments

The following table provides a summary of certain information concerning our obligations and commitments to make future payments, which is in addition to our outstanding principal debt obligations as presented in the previous table. See Note D - Business Combinations, Note F - Borrowings and Credit Arrangements  and Note H - Leases to our 2006 consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information
 
regarding our business combinations, debt obligations and lease arrangements. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, our consolidated balance sheets do not reflect the obligations below that relate to expenses incurred in future periods.
 

   
Payments Due by Period
     
(in millions)
 
2007
 
2008
 
2009
 
2010
 
2011
 
Thereafter
 
Total
 
Operating leases
 
$
61
 
$
47
 
$
24
 
$
11
 
$
5
 
$
36
 
$
184
 
Purchase obligations
   
182
   
1
   
1
   
1
               
185
 
Minimum royalty obligations
   
3
   
3
   
3
   
1
   
1
   
6
   
17
 
Interest payments ††
   
521
   
497
   
457
   
371
   
214
   
1,013
   
3,073
 
 
 
$
767
 
$
548
 
$
485
 
$
384
 
$
220
 
$
1,055
 
$
3,459
 
 
These obligations related primarily to inventory commitments and capital expenditures entered in the normal course of business.
††
Interest payment amounts related to the $5.0 billion five-year term loan are projected using market interest rates as of December 31, 2006. Future interest payments may differ from these projections based on changes in the market interest rates.
 
Certain of our business combinations involve the payment of contingent consideration. See Note D - Business Combinations to our 2006 consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for the estimated maximum potential amount of future contingent consideration we could be required to pay associated with our business combinations. Since it is not possible to estimate when, or even if, the acquired companies will reach their performance milestones or the amount of contingent consideration payable based on future revenues, the maximum contingent consideration has not been included in the table above. Additionally, we may consider satisfying these commitments by issuing our stock or refinancing the commitments with cash, including cash obtained through the sale of our stock.
 
Certain of our equity investments give us the option to acquire the company in the future or may require us to make payments that are contingent upon the company achieving certain product development targets or obtaining regulatory approvals. Since it is not possible to estimate when, or even if, we will exercise our option to acquire these companies or be required to make these contingent payments, we have not included future potential payments relating to these equity investments in the table above.
 
At December 31, 2006, we had outstanding letters of credit and bank guarantees of approximately $90 million, which primarily consisted of financial lines of credit provided by banks and collateral for workers’ compensation programs. We enter these letters of credit and bank guarantees in the normal course of business. As of December 31, 2006, we have not drawn upon the letters of credit or guarantees. At this time, we do not believe we will be required to fund any amounts from the guarantees or letters of credit and, accordingly, we have not recognized a related liability in our financial statements as of December 31, 2006. Our letters of credit and bank guarantees were immaterial at December 31, 2005.
 
Critical Accounting Policies
 
We have adopted accounting policies to prepare our consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP. We describe these accounting polices in Note A—Significant Accounting Policies to our 2006 consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
 
To prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, management makes estimates and assumptions that may affect the reported amounts of our assets and liabilities, the disclosure
 
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements and the reported amounts of our revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Our actual results may differ from these estimates.
 
We consider estimates to be critical (1) if we are required to make assumptions about material matters that are uncertain at the time of estimation or (2) if materially different, estimates could have been made or it is reasonably likely that the accounting estimate will change from period to period. The following are areas that we consider critical:
 
Revenue Recognition
 
Our revenue consists primarily of the sale of single-use medical devices. We consider revenue to be realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement exists; delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; the price is fixed or determinable; and collectibility is reasonably assured. We generally meet these criteria at the time of shipment when the risk of loss and title passes to the customer or distributor, unless a consignment arrangement exists. We recognize revenue from consignment arrangements based on product usage, or implant, which indicates that the sale is complete. For all other transactions, we recognize revenue when title to the goods and risk of loss transfer to customers, provided there are no remaining substantive performance obligations required of us or any matters requiring customer acceptance. For multiple-element arrangements, whereby the sale of devices is combined with future service obligations, we defer revenue on the undelivered elements based on verifiable objective evidence of fair value.
 
We generally allow our customers to return defective, damaged and, in certain cases, expired products for credit. In addition, we may allow customers to return previously purchased products for next-generation product offerings. We establish a reserve for sales returns when the initial product is sold. We base our estimate for sales returns upon contractual commitments and historical trends and recorded such amount as a reduction to revenue.
 
We offer sales rebates and discounts to certain customers. We treat sales rebates and discounts as a reduction of revenue and classify the corresponding liability as current. We estimate rebates for products where there is sufficient historical information available to predict the volume of expected future rebates. If we are unable to estimate the expected rebates reasonably, we record a liability for the maximum rebate percentage offered.
 
Inventory Reserves
 
We base our provisions for excess, obsolete or expired inventory primarily on our estimates of forecasted net sales levels. A significant change in the timing or level of demand for our products as compared to forecasted amounts may result in recording additional provisions for excess or expired inventory in the future. The industry in which we participate is characterized by rapid product development and frequent new product introductions. Uncertain timing of next-generation product approvals, variability in product launch strategies, product recalls and variation in product utilization all impact the estimates related to excess and obsolete inventory.
 
Valuation of Business Combinations
 
We allocate the amounts we pay for each acquisition to the assets we acquire and liabilities we assume based on their fair values at the dates of acquisition. We then allocate the purchase price in excess of net tangible assets acquired to identifiable intangible assets, including purchased research and development.
 
We base the fair value of identifiable intangible assets on detailed valuations that use information and assumptions provided by management. We allocate any excess purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired to goodwill. The use of alternative valuation assumptions, including estimated cash flows and discount rates, and alternative estimated useful life assumptions could result in different purchase price allocations, purchased research and development charges, and intangible asset amortization expense in current and future periods.
 
The valuation of purchased research and development represents the estimated fair value at the dates of acquisition related to in-process projects. Our purchased research and development represents the value of in-process projects that have not yet reached technological feasibility and have no alternative future uses as of the date of acquisition. The primary basis for determining the technological feasibility of these projects is obtaining regulatory approval to market the underlying products in an applicable geographic region. We expense the value attributable to these in-process projects at the time of the acquisition. If the projects are not successful or completed in a timely manner, we may not realize the financial benefits expected for these projects or for the acquisitions as a whole. In addition, we record certain costs associated with our strategic alliances as purchased research and development.
 
We use the income approach to determine the fair values of our purchased research and development. This approach determines fair value by estimating the after-tax cash flows attributable to an in-process project over its useful life and then discounting these after-tax cash flows back to a present value. We base our revenue assumptions on estimates of relevant market sizes, expected market growth rates, expected trends in technology and expected product introductions by competitors. In arriving at the value of the in-process projects, we consider, among other factors: the in-process projects’ stage of completion; the complexity of the work completed as of the acquisition date; the costs already incurred; the projected costs to complete; the contribution of core technologies and other acquired assets; the expected introduction date; and the estimated useful life of the technology. We base the discount rate used to arrive at a present value as of the date of acquisition on the time value of money and medical technology investment risk factors. For the in-process projects we acquired in connection with our recent acquisitions, we used the following ranges of risk-adjusted discount rates to discount our projected cash flows: 13 percent to 17 percent in 2006, 18 percent to 27 percent in 2005, and 18 percent to 27 percent in 2004. We believe that the estimated purchased research and development amounts so determined represent the fair value at the date of acquisition and do not exceed the amount a third party would pay for the projects.
 
Impairment of Intangible Assets
 
We review our intangible assets quarterly to determine if any adverse conditions exist or a change in circumstances has occurred that would indicate impairment or a change in their remaining useful life. In addition, we review our indefinite-lived intangible assets at least annually for impairment and reassess their classification as indefinite-lived assets. To test for impairment, we calculate the fair value of our indefinite-lived intangible assets and compare the calculated fair values to the respective carrying values.
 
We test our March 31 goodwill balances during the second quarter of each year for impairment, or more frequently if certain indicators are present or changes in circumstances suggest that impairment may exist. In performing the test, we calculate the fair value of our reporting units as the present value of estimated future cash flows using a risk-adjusted discount rate. The selection and use of an appropriate discount rate requires significant management judgment with respect to revenue and expense growth rates. We have not recorded impairment of goodwill in any of the years included in our consolidated statements of operations.
 
Investments in Strategic Alliances
 
We account for investments in companies over which we have the ability to exercise significant influence under the equity method if we hold 50 percent or less of the voting stock. We account for investments in companies over which we do not have the ability to exercise significant influence under the cost method. Our determination of whether we have the ability to exercise significant influence over an investment requires judgment. Factors that we consider in determining whether we have the ability to exercise significant influence include, but are not limited to:
 
• our level of representation on the Board of Directors;
• our participation in the investee’s policy-making processes;
• transactions with the investee in the ordinary course of business;
• interchange of managerial personnel;
• the investee’s financial or technological dependency on us; and
• our ownership in relation to the concentration of other shareholders.
 
We regularly review our strategic alliance investments for impairment indicators.  If we determine that impairment exists and it is other-than-temporary, we recognize an impairment loss equal to the difference between an investment’s carrying value and its fair value. Our exposure to loss related to our strategic alliances is generally limited to our equity investments and notes receivable associated with these alliances.
 
See Note A - Significant Accounting Policies and Note C - Investments in Strategic Alliances to our 2006 consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for a detailed analysis of our investments and our accounting treatment for our investment portfolio.
 
Income Taxes
 
We utilize the asset and liability method for accounting for income taxes. Under this method, we determine deferred tax assets and liabilities based on differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of our assets and liabilities. We measure deferred tax assets and liabilities using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when we expect the differences to reverse.
 
We recognized net deferred tax liabilities of $2.201 billion at December 31, 2006 and $110 million at December 31, 2005. The liabilities relate primarily to deferred taxes associated with our acquisitions. The assets relate primarily to the establishment of inventory and product-related reserves, litigation and product liability reserves, purchased research and development, net operating loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards. In light of our historical financial performance, we believe we will substantially recover these assets.
 
We reduce our deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance if, based upon the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that we will not realize some portion or all of the deferred tax assets. We consider relevant evidence, both positive and negative, to determine the need for a valuation allowance. Information evaluated includes our financial position and results of operations for the current and preceding years, as well as an evaluation of currently available information about future years.
 
We do not provide income taxes on unremitted earnings of our foreign subsidiaries where we have indefinitely reinvested such earnings in our foreign operations. It is not practical to estimate the amount of income taxes payable on the earnings that are indefinitely reinvested in foreign operations. Unremitted earnings of our foreign subsidiaries that we have indefinitely reinvested offshore are $7.186 billion at December 31, 2006 and $2.106 billion at December 31, 2005.
 
We provide for potential amounts due in various tax jurisdictions. In the ordinary course of conducting business in multiple countries and tax jurisdictions, there are many transactions and calculations where
 
the ultimate tax outcome is uncertain. Judgment is required in determining our worldwide income tax provision. In our opinion, we have made adequate provisions for income taxes for all years subject to audit. Although we believe our estimates are reasonable, we can make no assurance that the final tax outcome of these matters will not be different from that which we have reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals. Such differences could have a material impact on our income tax provision and operating results in the period in which we make such determination.
 
See Note I — Income Taxes to our 2006 consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for a detailed analysis of our income tax accounting.
 
Legal, Product Liability Costs and Securities Claims
 
We are involved in various legal and regulatory proceedings, including intellectual property, breach of contract, securities litigation and product liability suits. In some cases, the claimants seek damages, as well as other relief, which if granted, could require significant expenditures or impact our ability to sell our products. We are substantially self-insured with respect to general, product liability and securities claims and record losses for claims in excess of the limits of purchased insurance in earnings at the time and to the extent they are probable and estimable. In accordance with FASB Statement No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies , we accrue anticipated costs of settlement, damages, loss for general product liability claims and, under certain conditions, costs of defense based on historical experience or to the extent specific losses are probable and estimable. Otherwise, we expense these costs as incurred. If the estimate of a probable loss is a range and no amount within the range is more likely, we accrue the minimum amount of the range. Our accrual for legal matters that are probable and estimable was $485 million at December 31, 2006 and $35 million at December 31, 2005. In connection with our acquisition of Guidant, the number of product liability claims and other legal proceedings filed against us, including private securities litigation and shareholder derivative suits, significantly increased. The amounts accrued at December 31, 2006 represent primarily accrued legal defense costs related to assumed Guidant litigation and product liability claims recorded as part of the purchase price. In connection with the acquisition of Guidant, we are still assessing certain assumed litigation and product liability claims to determine the amounts that management believes will be paid as a result of such claims and litigation and, therefore, additional losses may be accrued in the future. See further discussion of our material legal proceedings in Item 3. Legal Proceedings above and Note J — Commitments and Contingencies to our 2006 consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
 
Stock-Based Compensation
 
On January 1, 2006, we adopted FASB Statement No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment , which requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the consolidated statements of operations based on their fair values. We adopted Statement No. 123(R) using the “modified-prospective method” and have not restated prior period results of operations and financial position to reflect the impact of stock-based compensation expense under Statement No. 123(R). We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of our stock options. We value restricted stock awards and deferred stock units based on the closing trading value of our shares on the date of grant. The following represents the assumptions used in calculating our stock-based compensation expense that require significant judgment by management:

Expected Volatility - We have considered a number of factors in estimating volatility. For options granted prior to 2006, we used our historical volatility as a basis to estimate expected volatility in our valuation of stock options. We changed our method of estimating volatility upon the adoption of Statement No. 123(R). We now consider historical volatility, trends in volatility within our industry/peer group and implied volatility.

Expected Term - We estimate the expected term of our options using historical exercise and forfeiture data. We believe that this historical data is currently the best estimate of the expected term of our new option grants.

Estimated Forfeiture Rate -We have applied, based on an analysis of our historical forfeitures, an annual forfeiture rate of eight percent to all unvested stock awards as of December 31, 2006, which represents the portion that we expect will be forfeited each year over the vesting period. We will reevaluate this analysis periodically and adjust the forfeiture rate as necessary. Ultimately, we will only recognize expense for those shares that vest.

See Note L - Stock Ownership Plans to our 2006 consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further discussion regarding our adoption of Statement No. 123(R).
 
New Accounting Standard
 
In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes , to create a single model to address accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. Interpretation No. 48 requires the use of a two-step approach for recognizing and measuring tax benefits taken or expected to be taken in a tax return and disclosures regarding uncertainties in income tax positions, including a roll forward of tax benefits taken that do not qualify for financial statement recognition. We will record the cumulative effect of initially adopting Interpretation No. 48 as an adjustment to opening retained earnings in the year of adjustment and present such adjustment separately. Only tax positions that we are more likely than not to realize at the effective date may be recognized upon adoption of Interpretation No. 48. We are required to adopt Interpretation No. 48 effective for our first quarter of 2007. We are currently in the process of assessing the impact of the new standard.
 
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
As the management of Boston Scientific Corporation, we are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. We designed our internal control system to provide reasonable assurance to management and the Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of our financial statements.
 
We assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control—Integrated Framework. Based on our assessment, we believe that, as of December 31, 2006, our internal control over financial reporting is effective at a reasonable assurance level based on these criteria.
 
Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an audit report on management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting and on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. This report in which they expressed an unqualified opinion is included below.
 

       
/s/ James R. Tobin
 
/s/ Lawrence C. Best
 
President and Chief Executive Officer
 
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Boston Scientific Corporation
 
        We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that Boston Scientific Corporation maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Boston Scientific Corporation’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
 
        We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
        A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
 
        Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
 
        In our opinion, management’s assessment that Boston Scientific Corporation maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, Boston Scientific Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on the COSO criteria.
 
        We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Boston Scientific Corporation as of December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006 of Boston Scientific Corporation and our report dated February 26, 2007, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
 
 
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
 
Boston, Massachusetts
February 26, 2007  
ITEM 7A.       QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
 
We develop, manufacture and sell medical devices globally and our earnings and cash flow are exposed to market risk from changes in currency exchange rates and interest rates. We address these risks through a risk management program that includes the use of derivative financial instruments. We operate the program pursuant to documented corporate risk management policies. We do not enter derivative transactions for speculative purposes. Gains and losses on derivative financial instruments substantially offset losses and gains on underlying hedged exposures. Furthermore, we manage our exposure to counterparty nonperformance on derivative instruments by entering into contracts with a diversified group of major financial institutions and by monitoring outstanding positions.
 
Our currency risk consists primarily of foreign currency denominated firm commitments, forecasted foreign currency denominated intercompany and third-party transactions and net investments in certain subsidiaries. We use both nonderivative (primarily European manufacturing operations) and derivative instruments to manage our earnings and cash flow exposure to changes in currency exchange rates. We had currency derivative instruments outstanding in the contract amount of $3.413 billion at December 31, 2006 and $3.593 billion at December 31, 2005. We recorded $71 million of other assets and $27 million of other liabilities to recognize the fair value of these derivative instruments at December 31, 2006 as compared to $176 million of other assets and $55 million of other liabilities recorded at December 31, 2005. A 10 percent appreciation in the U.S. dollar’s value relative to the hedged currencies would increase the derivative instruments’ fair value by $112 million at December 31, 2006 and by $129 million at December 31, 2005. A 10 percent depreciation in the U.S. dollar’s value relative to the hedged currencies would decrease the derivative instruments’ fair value by $134 million at December 31, 2006 and $157 million at December 31, 2005. Any increase or decrease in the fair value of our currency exchange rate sensitive derivative instruments would be substantially offset by a corresponding decrease or increase in the fair value of the hedged underlying asset, liability or forecasted transaction.
 
Our interest rate risk relates primarily to U.S. dollar borrowings partially offset by U.S. dollar cash investments. We use interest rate derivative instruments to manage the risk of interest rate changes either by converting floating-rate borrowings into fixed-rate borrowings or fixed-rate borrowings into floating-rate borrowings. We had interest rate derivative instruments outstanding in the notional amount of $2.0 billion at December 31, 2006 and $1.1 billion at December 31, 2005. The increase in the notional amount is due to $2.0 billion of hedge contracts related to our $5.0 billion five-year term loan, offset by our termination of $1.1 billion in hedge contracts related to certain of our existing senior notes. We recorded $11 million of other liabilities to recognize the fair value of our interest rate derivative instruments at December 31, 2006 as compared to $21 million of other assets and $7 million of other liabilities recorded at December 31, 2005. A one percentage point increase in interest rates would increase the derivative instruments’ fair value by $26 million at December 31, 2006 as compared to a decrease of $74 million at December 31, 2005. A one percentage point decrease in interest rates would decrease the derivative instruments’ fair value by $26 million at December 31, 2006 as compared to an increase of $80 million at December 31, 2005. Any increase or decrease in the fair value of our interest rate derivative instruments would be substantially offset by a corresponding decrease or increase in the fair value of the hedged interest payments related to the hedged term loan. At December 31, 2006, $5.886 billion, or 81 percent, of our approximately $7.234 billion in outstanding net debt is at fixed interest rates.  
 
See Note G - Financial Instruments to our 2006 consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for detailed information regarding our derivative financial instruments.
 
 
 
ITEM 8.       FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (in millions, except per share data)
               
Year Ended December 31,
 
2006
 
2005
 
2004
 
               
Net sales
 
$
7,821
 
$
6,283
 
$
5,624
 
Cost of products sold
   
2,207
   
1,386
   
1,292
 
Gross profit
   
5,614
   
4,897
   
4,332
 
                     
Selling, general and administrative expenses
   
2,675
   
1,814
   
1,742
 
Research and development expenses
   
1,008
   
680
   
569
 
Royalty expense
   
231
   
227
   
195
 
Amortization expense
   
530
   
152
   
112
 
Litigation-related charges
         
780
   
75
 
Purchased research and development
   
4,119
   
276
   
65
 
Total operating expenses
   
8,563
   
3,929
   
2,758
 
Operating (loss) income
   
(2,949
)
 
968
   
1,574
 
                     
Other income (expense):
                   
Interest expense
   
(435
)
 
(90
)
 
(64
)
Fair value adjustment for sharing of proceeds feature of Abbott stock purchase
   
(95
)
           
Other, net
   
(56
)
 
13
   
(16
)
(Loss) income before income taxes
   
(3,535
)
 
891
   
1,494
 
 
Income taxes
   
42
   
263
   
432
 
 
Net (loss) income
 
$
(3,577
)
$
628
 
$
1,062
 
 
Net (loss) income per common share — basic
 
$
(2.81
)
$
0.76
 
$
1.27
 
 
Net (loss) income per common share — assuming dilution
 
$
(2.81
)
$
0.75
 
$
1.24
 

(See notes to the consolidated financial statements)
 
 

 
 
 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (in millions)
           
As of December 31,
 
2006
 
2005
 
 
Assets
         
Current assets
         
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
1,668
 
$
689
 
Marketable securities
         
159
 
Trade accounts receivable, net
   
1,424
   
932
 
Inventories
   
749
   
418
 
Deferred income taxes
   
583
   
152
 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
   
477
   
281
 
Total current assets
 
$
4,901
 
$
2,631
 
               
Property, plant and equipment, net
   
1,726
   
1,011
 
Investments
   
596
   
594
 
Other assets
   
237
   
225
 
Intangible assets
             
Goodwill
   
14,628
   
1,938
 
Technology — core, net
   
6,973
   
1,099
 
Technology — developed, net
   
897
   
209
 
Patents, net
   
339
   
338
 
Other intangible assets, net
   
799
   
151
 
Total intangible assets
   
23,636
   
3,735
 
               
 
 
$
31,096
 
$
8,196
 

(See notes to the consolidated financial statements)


 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (in millions, except share data)
           
As of December 31,
 
2006
 
2005
 
 
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
         
Current liabilities
         
Commercial paper
       
$
149
 
Current debt obligations
 
$
7
   
7
 
Accounts payable
   
222
   
105
 
Accrued expenses
   
1,845
   
1,124
 
Income taxes payable
   
413
   
17
 
Other current liabilities
   
143
   
77
 
Total current liabilities
 
$
2,630
 
$
1,479
 
               
Long-term debt
   
8,895
   
1,864
 
Deferred income taxes
   
2,784
   
262
 
Other long-term liabilities
   
1,489
   
309
 
Commitments and contingencies
             
               
Stockholders’ equity
             
Preferred stock, $ .01 par value — authorized 50,000,000 shares, none issued and outstanding
             
Common stock, $ .01 par value — authorized 2,000,000,000 shares and issued 1,486,403,445 shares at December 31, 2006; authorized 1,200,000,000 shares and issued 844,565,292 shares at December 31, 2005
   
15
   
8
 
Additional paid-in capital
   
15,792
   
1,658
 
Deferred cost, ESOP
   
(58
)
     
Deferred compensation
         
(98
)
Treasury stock, at cost — 11,728,643   shares at December 31, 2006 and 24,215,559 shares at December 31, 2005
   
(334
)
 
(717
)
Retained (deficit) earnings
   
(174
)
 
3,410
 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
             
Foreign currency translation adjustment
   
16
   
(71
)
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net
   
16
   
26
 
Unrealized gain on derivative financial instruments, net
   
32
   
67
 
Unrealized costs associated with certain retirement plans
   
(7
)
 
(1
)
 
Total stockholders’ equity
   
15,298
   
4,282
 
 
 
 
$
31,096
 
$
8,196
 
 
(See notes to the consolidated financial statements)


 
 
 

 
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (in millions, except share data)
                                   
   
Common Stock
         
Deferred Cost, ESOP
                 
   
Shares Issued
 
Par Value
 
Additional Paid-In Capital
 
Deferred Compensation
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
Treasury Stock
 
Retained Earnings
 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
 
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
 
Balance at December 31, 2003
   
829,764,826
 
$
8
 
$
1,225
                   
$
(111
)
$
1,789
 
$
(49
)
     
Comprehensive income
                                                             
Net income
                                             
1,062
       
$
1,062
 
Other comprehensive income (expense), net of tax
                                                             
Foreign currency translation adjustment
                                                   
16
   
16
 
Net change in equity investments
                                                   
(48
)
 
(48
)
Net change in derivative financial instruments
                                                   
(3
)
 
(3
)
Issuance of common stock
   
14,800,466
         
132
                     
149
   
(56
)
           
Issuance of restricted stock, net of cancellations
               
1
 
$
(3
)
             
2
                   
Repurchases of common stock
                                       
(360
)
                 
Tax benefit related to stock options
               
185
                                           
Step-up accounting adjustment for certain investments
                                             
(5
)
           
Stock-based compensation expense for certain modifications
               
90
                                           
Amortization of deferred compensation
                     
1
                                     
Balance at December 31, 2004
   
844,565,292
   
8
   
1,633
   
(2
)
             
(320
)
 
2,790
   
(84
)
$
1,027
 
Comprehensive income
                                                             
Net income
                                             
628
       
$
628
 
Other comprehensive income (expense), net of tax
                                                             
Foreign currency translation adjustment
                                                   
(37
)
 
(37
)
Net change in equity investments
                                                   
24
   
24
 
Net change in derivative financial instruments
                                                   
118
   
118
 
Issuance of common stock
               
(113
)
                   
207
                   
Common stock issued for acquisitions
               
(5
)
                   
129
                   
Issuance of restricted stock, net of cancellations
               
114
   
(115
)
             
1
                   
Repurchases of common stock
                                       
(734
)
                 
Tax benefit related to stock options
               
28
                                           
Step-up accounting adjustment for certain investments
                                             
(8
)
           
Amortization of deferred compensation
               
1
   
19
                                     
Balance at December 31, 2005
   
844,565,292
   
8
   
1,658
   
(98
)
             
(717
)
 
3,410
   
21
 
$
733
 
Comprehensive income
                                                             
Net loss
                                             
(3,577
)
     
$
(3,577
)
Other comprehensive income (expense), net of tax
                                                             
Foreign currency translation adjustment
                                                   
87
   
87
 
Net change in equity investments
                                                   
(10
)
 
(10
)
Net change in derivative financial instruments
                                                   
(35
)
 
(35
)
Net change in certain retirement amounts
                                                   
(6
)
 
(6
)
Issuance of shares of common stock for Guidant acquisition
   
577,206,996
   
6
   
12,508
                                           
Conversion of outstanding Guidant stock options
               
450
                                           
Issuance of shares of common stock to Abbott
   
64,631,157
   
1
   
1,399
                                           
Issuance of common stock
               
(238
)
                   
383
                   
Tax benefit related to stock options
               
7
                                           
Reversal of deferred compensation in accordance with SFAS 123(R)
               
(98
)
 
98
                                     
Stock-based compensation expense, including amounts capitalized to inventory
               
115
                                           
Step-up accounting adjustment for certain investments
                                             
(7
)
           
Acquired 401(k) ESOP for legacy Guidant employees
                           
3,794,965
 
$
(86
)
                       
401 (k) ESOP transactions
               
(9
)
       
(1,237,662
)
 
28
                         
Balance at December 31, 2006
   
1,486,403,445
 
$
15
 
$
15,792
         
2,557,303
 
$
(58
)
$
(334
)
$
(174
)
$
57
 
$
(3,541
)
 
(See notes to the consolidated financial statements)
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (in millions)
       
Year Ended December 31,
 
2006
 
2005
 
2004
 
 
Operating Activities
             
Net (loss) income
 
$
(3,577
)
$
628
 
$
1,062
 
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to cash provided by operating activities:
                   
Gain on sale of equity investments
   
(9
)
 
(4
)
 
(36
)
Write-downs of investments
   
121
   
41
   
58
 
Depreciation and amortization
   
781
   
314
   
275
 
Step-up value of acquired inventory sold
   
267
             
Deferred income taxes
   
(420
)
 
4
   
30
 
Fair-value adjustment for sharing of proceeds feature of Abbott stock purchase
   
95
             
Purchased research and development
   
4,119
   
276
   
65
 
Tax benefit relating to stock options
         
28
   
185
 
Stock-based compensation expense
   
113
   
19
   
91
 
Increase (decrease) in cash flows from operating assets and liabilities, excluding the effect of acquisitions:
                   
Trade accounts receivable
   
64
   
(24
)
 
(317
)
Inventories
   
(53
)
 
(77
)
 
(57
)
Prepaid expenses and other assets
   
79
   
(100
)
 
(73
)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
   
(1
)
 
(162
)
 
362
 
Income taxes payable and other liabilities
   
234
   
(51
)
 
171
 
Other, net
   
32
   
11
   
(12
)
Cash provided by operating activities
   
1,845
   
903
   
1,804
 
Investing Activities
                   
Property, plant and equipment
                   
Purchases
   
(341
)
 
(341
)
 
(274
)
Proceeds on disposals
   
18
   
19
       
Marketable securities
                   
Purchases
         
(56
)
 
(660
)
Proceeds from maturities
   
159
   
241
   
397
 
Acquisitions
                   
Payments for the acquisition of Guidant
   
(15,394
)
           
Cash acquired in the acquisition of Guidant, including proceeds from Guidant’s sale of its vascular intervention and endovascular solutions businesses
   
6,708
             
Payments for acquisitions of other businesses, net of cash acquired
         
(178
)
 
(804
)
Payments relating to prior year acquisitions
   
(397
)
 
(33
)
 
(107
)
Strategic alliances
                   
Purchases of publicly traded equity securities
         
(52
)
 
(23
)
Payments for investments in privately held companies and acquisitions of certain technologies
   
(98
)
 
(156
)
 
(249
)
Proceeds from sales of privately held and publicly traded equity securities
   
33
   
5
   
98
 
Cash used for investing activities
   
(9,312
)
 
(551
)
 
(1,622
)
Financing Activities
                   
Debt
                   
Net payments on commercial paper
   
(149
)
 
(131
)
 
(723
)
Payments on notes payable, capital leases and long-term borrowings
   
(1,510
)
 
(508
)
 
(17
)
Proceeds from notes payable and long-term borrowings, net of debt issuance costs
   
8,544
   
739
   
1,092
 
Net proceeds from (payments on) borrowings on revolving credit facilities
   
3
   
(413
)
 
225
 
Equity
                   
Repurchases of common stock
         
(734
)
 
(360
)
Proceeds from issuance of shares of common stock to Abbott
   
1,400
             
Proceeds from issuances of shares of common stock
   
145
   
94
   
225
 
Tax benefit relating to stock options
   
7
             
Other, net
   
(1
)
 
(1
)
 
(3
)
Cash provided by (used for) financing activities
   
8,439
   
(954
)
 
439
 
Effect of foreign exchange rates on cash
   
7
   
(5
)
 
4
 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
   
979
   
(607
)
 
625
 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
   
689
   
1,296
   
671
 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
 
$
1,668
 
$
689
 
$
1,296
 
                     
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION - Cash paid during the year for:
                   
Income taxes
 
$
40
 
$
350
 
$
72
 
Interest
   
383
   
87
   
61
 
 
(See notes to the consolidated financial statements)


Principles of Consolidation
 
Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Boston Scientific Corporation and our subsidiaries, substantially all of which we wholly own. We consider the principles of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities and Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidation of Financial Statements , when determining whether an entity is subject to consolidation. We account for investments in companies over which we have the ability to exercise significant influence under the equity method if we hold 50 percent or less of the voting stock.

On April 21, 2006, we consummated our acquisition of Guidant Corporation. Prior to our acquisition of Guidant, Abbott Laboratories acquired Guidant’s vascular intervention and endovascular solutions businesses and agreed to share the drug-eluting technology it acquired from Guidant with us. We consolidated Guidant’s operating results with those of Boston Scientific beginning on the date of the acquisition, April 21, 2006. See Note D - Business Combinations for further details regarding the transaction.

Accounting Estimates

To prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, management makes estimates and assumptions that may affect the reported amounts of our assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements and the reported amounts of our revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Our actual results could differ from these estimates.

Cash, Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities

We record cash and cash equivalents in our consolidated balance sheets at cost, which approximates fair value. We consider all highly liquid investments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

We invest excess cash in high-quality marketable securities consisting primarily of bank time deposits. We record available-for-sale investments at fair value. We exclude unrealized gains and temporary losses on available-for-sale securities from earnings and report such gains and losses, net of tax, as a separate component of stockholders’ equity until realized. We compute realized gains and losses on sales of available-for-sale securities based upon initial cost adjusted for any other-than-temporary declines in fair value. We record held-to-maturity securities at amortized cost and adjust for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. We classify investments in debt securities or equity securities that have a readily determinable fair value that we purchase and hold principally for selling them in the near term as trading securities. All of our cash investments at December 31, 2006 had maturity dates at date of purchase of less than three months and, accordingly, we have classified them as cash and cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2005, we classified our cash investments with maturities greater than 90 days but less than one year as available-for-sale. We do not consider any of our investments to be held-to-maturity or trading securities at December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005.

Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities at December 31 consist of the following:


(in millions)
 
2006
 
2005
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
1,668
 
$
689
 
Marketable securities
             
Available-for-sale
         
159
 
   
$
1,668
 
$
848
 
 
The amortized cost of marketable securities approximated their fair value at December 31, 2005.
 
Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, derivative financial instrument contracts and accounts receivable. Our investment policy limits exposure to concentrations of credit risk and changes in market conditions. Counterparties to financial instruments expose us to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance. We transact our financial instruments with a diversified group of major financial institutions and monitor outstanding positions to limit our credit exposure.

We provide credit, in the normal course of business, to hospitals, healthcare agencies, clinics, doctors’ offices and other private and governmental institutions. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and maintain allowances for potential credit losses.

Revenue Recognition

Our revenue consists primarily of the sale of single-use medical devices. We consider revenue to be realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement exists; delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; the price is fixed or determinable; and collectibility is reasonably assured. We generally meet these criteria at the time of shipment when the risk of loss and title passes to the customer or distributor, unless a consignment arrangement exists. We recognize revenue from consignment arrangements based on product usage, or implant, which indicates that the sale is complete. For all other transactions, we recognize revenue when title to the goods and risk of loss transfer to the customer, provided there are no substantive remaining performance obligations required of us or any matters requiring customer acceptance. For multiple-element arrangements, whereby the sale of devices is combined with future service obligations, we defer revenue on the undelivered elements based on verifiable objective evidence of fair value.

We generally allow our customers to return defective, damaged and, in certain cases, expired products for credit. In addition, we may allow customers to return previously purchased products for next-generation product offerings. We establish a reserve for sales returns when the initial product is sold. We base our estimate for sales returns upon contractual commitments and historical trends and record such amount as a reduction to revenue.

We offer sales rebates and discounts to certain customers. We treat sales rebates and discounts as a reduction of revenue and classify the corresponding liability as current. We estimate rebates for products where there is sufficient historical information available to predict the volume of expected future rebates. If we are unable to estimate the expected rebates reasonably, we record a liability for the maximum rebate percentage offered.

We have entered certain agreements with group purchasing organizations to sell our products to participating hospitals at pre-negotiated prices. We recognize revenue generated from these agreements following the same revenue recognition criteria discussed above.

Inventories

We state inventories at the lower of first-in, first-out cost or market. We base our provisions for excess, obsolete or expired inventory primarily on our estimates of forecasted net sales levels. A significant change in the timing or level of demand for our products as compared to forecasted amounts may result in recording additional provisions for excess or expired inventory in the future. The industry in which we participate is characterized by rapid product development and frequent new product introductions. Uncertain timing of next-generation product approvals, variability in product launch strategies, product recalls and variation in product utilization all impact the estimates related to excess and obsolete inventory. We record provisions for inventory located in our manufacturing and distribution facilities as cost of sales. We charge consignment inventory write-downs to selling, general and administrative expense. These write-downs approximated $24 million in 2006, $15 million in 2005, and $10 million in 2004.

Property, Plant and Equipment

We state property, plant, equipment, and leasehold improvements at historical cost, except for property, plant and equipment acquired in a business combination, which we state at fair value. We charge expenditures for maintenance and repairs to expense and capitalize additions and improvements. We generally provide for depreciation using the straight-line method at rates that approximate the estimated useful lives of the assets. We depreciate buildings and improvements over a 20 to 40 year life; equipment, furniture and fixtures over a three to seven year life; and leasehold improvements over the shorter of the useful life of the improvement or the term of the lease.

Valuation of Business Combinations

We record intangible assets acquired in recent business combinations under the purchase method of accounting. We allocate the amounts we pay for each acquisition to the assets we acquire and liabilities we assume based on their fair values at the dates of acquisition. We then allocate the purchase price in excess of net tangible assets acquired to identifiable intangible assets, including purchased research and development. We base the fair value of identifiable intangible assets on detailed valuations that use information and assumptions provided by management. We allocate any excess purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired to goodwill.

Purchased Research and Development

Our purchased research and development represents the value of in-process projects that have not yet reached technological feasibility and have no alternative future uses as of the date of acquisition. The primary basis for determining the technological feasibility of these projects is obtaining regulatory approval to market the underlying products in an applicable geographic region. We expense the value attributable to these in-process projects at the time of the acquisition. If the projects are not successful or completed in a timely manner, we may not realize the financial benefits expected for these projects or for the acquisitions as a whole. In addition, we record certain costs associated with our strategic alliances as purchased research and development.

We use the income approach to determine the fair values of our purchased research and development. This approach calculates fair value by estimating the after-tax cash flows attributable to an in-process project over its useful life and then discounting these after-tax cash flows back to a present value. We base our revenue assumptions on estimates of relevant market sizes, expected market growth rates, expected trends in technology and expected product introductions by competitors. In arriving at the value of the in-process projects, we consider, among other factors: the in-process projects’ stage of completion; the complexity of the work completed as of the acquisition date; the costs already incurred; the projected costs to complete; the contribution of core technologies and other acquired assets; the expected introduction date and the estimated useful life of the technology. We base the discount rate used to arrive at a present value as of the date of acquisition on the time value of money and medical technology investment risk factors. For the in-process projects we acquired in connection with our recent acquisitions, we used the following ranges of risk-adjusted discount rates to discount our projected cash flows: 13 percent to 17 percent in 2006, 18 percent to 27 percent in 2005, and 18 percent to 27 percent in 2004. We believe that the estimated purchased research and development amounts so determined represent the fair value at the date of acquisition and do not exceed the amount a third party would pay for the projects.

Amortization and Impairment of Intangible Assets

We record intangible assets at historical cost. We amortize our intangible assets using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, as follows: patents and licenses, two to 20 years; definite-lived core and developed technology, five to 25 years; customer relationships, five to 25 years; other intangible assets, various. We review intangible assets subject to amortization quarterly to determine if any adverse conditions exist or a change in circumstances has occurred that would indicate impairment or a change in the remaining useful life. Conditions that would indicate impairment and trigger a more frequent impairment assessment include, but are not limited to, a significant adverse change in legal factors or business climate that could affect the value of an asset, or an adverse action or assessment by a regulator. If the carrying value of an asset exceeds its undiscounted cash flows, we write-down the carrying value of the intangible asset to its fair value in the period identified.

We generally calculate fair value as the present value of estimated future cash flows we expect to generate from the asset using a risk-adjusted discount rate. If the estimate of an intangible asset’s remaining useful life is changed, we amortize the remaining carrying value of the intangible asset prospectively over the revised remaining useful life. In addition, we review our indefinite-lived intangible assets at least annually for impairment and reassess their classification as indefinite-lived assets. To test for impairment, we calculate the fair value of our indefinite-lived intangible assets and compare the calculated fair values to the respective carrying values. We record impairments of intangible assets as amortization expense in our consolidated statements of operations.

We test our March 31 goodwill balances during the second quarter of each year for impairment, or more frequently if certain indicators are present or changes in circumstances suggest that impairment may exist. In performing the test, we utilize the two-step approach prescribed under FASB Statement No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets . The first step requires a comparison of the carrying value of the reporting units, as defined, to the fair value of these units. As of December 31, 2006, we identified our 10 domestic divisions, which in aggregate make up the U.S. reportable segment, and our three international operating segments as our reporting units for purposes of the goodwill impairment test. To derive the carrying value of our reporting units
 
at the time of acquisition, we assign goodwill to the reporting units that we expect to benefit from the respective business combination. In addition, assets and liabilities, including corporate assets, which relate to a reporting unit’s operations and would be considered in determining fair value, are allocated to the individual reporting units. We allocate assets and liabilities not directly related to a specific reporting unit, but from which the reporting unit benefits, based primarily on the respective revenue contribution of each reporting unit. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, we will perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill to its carrying value. Since the adoption of Statement No. 142, we have not performed the second step of the impairment test because the fair value of each reporting unit has exceeded its respective carrying value.

Investments in Strategic Alliances

We account for our publicly traded investments as available-for-sale securities based on the quoted market price at the end of the reporting period. We compute realized gains and losses on sales of available-for-sale securities based on the average cost method, adjusted for any other-than-temporary declines in fair value. We account for our investments for which fair value is not readily determinable in accordance with APB Opinion No. 18, The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock , Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) No. 02-14, Whether an Investor Should Apply the Equity Method of Accounting to Investments other than Common Stock and FASB Staff Position Nos. 115-1 and 124-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments.

We account for investments in companies over which we have the ability to exercise significant influence under the equity method if we hold 50 percent or less of the voting stock. We account for investments in companies over which we do not have the ability to exercise significant influence under the cost method. Our determination of whether we have the ability to exercise significant influence over an investment requires judgment. Factors that we consider in determining whether we have the ability to exercise significant influence include, but are not limited to:

• our level of representation on the Board of Directors;
• our participation in the investee’s policy-making processes;
• transactions with the investee in the ordinary course of business;
• interchange of managerial personnel;
• the investee’s financial or technological dependency on us; and
• our ownership in relation to the concentration of other shareholders.

For investments accounted for under the equity method, we initially record the investment at cost, and adjust the carrying amount to reflect our share of the earnings or losses of the investee, including all adjustments similar to those made in preparing consolidated financial statements.

Each reporting period, we evaluate our investments to determine if there are any events or circumstances that are likely to have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investment. Examples of such impairment indicators include, but are not limited to: a significant deterioration in earnings performance; a significant adverse change in the regulatory, economic or technological environment of an investee; or a significant doubt about an investee’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we identify an impairment indicator, we will estimate the fair value of the investment and compare it to its carrying value. If the fair value of the investment is less than its carrying value, the investment is impaired and we make a determination as to
 
whether the impairment is other-than-temporary. We deem impairment to be other-than-temporary unless we have the ability and intent to hold an investment for a period sufficient for a market recovery up to the carrying value of the investment. Further, evidence must indicate that the carrying value of the investment is recoverable within a reasonable period. For other-than-temporary impairments, we recognize an impairment loss equal to the difference between an investment’s carrying value and its fair value. Impairment losses on these investments are included in other, net in our consolidated statements of operations.

Income Taxes
 
We utilize the asset and liability method for accounting for income taxes. Under this method, we determine deferred tax assets and liabilities based on differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of our assets and liabilities. We measure deferred tax assets and liabilities using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when we expect the differences to reverse.
 
We recognized net deferred tax liabilities of $2.201 billion at December 31, 2006 and $110 million at December 31, 2005. The liabilities relate primarily to deferred taxes associated with our acquisitions. The assets relate primarily to the establishment of inventory and product-related reserves, litigation and product liability reserves, purchased research and development, net operating loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards. In light of our historical financial performance, we believe we will substantially recover these assets. See Note I—Income Taxes for a detailed analysis of our deferred tax positions.
 
We reduce our deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance if, based upon the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that we will not realize some portion or all of the deferred tax assets. We consider relevant evidence, both positive and negative, to determine the need for a valuation allowance. Information evaluated includes our financial position and results of operations for the current and preceding years, as well as an evaluation of currently available information about future years.
 
We provide for potential amounts due in various tax jurisdictions. In the ordinary course of conducting business in multiple countries and tax jurisdictions, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax outcome is uncertain. Judgment is required in determining our worldwide income tax provision. In our opinion, we have made adequate provisions for income taxes for all years subject to audit. Although we believe our estimates are reasonable, we can make no assurance that the final tax outcome of these matters will not be different from that which we have reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals. Such differences could have a material impact on our income tax provision and operating results in the period in which we make such determination.

Legal, Product Liability Costs and Securities Claims

We are involved in various legal and regulatory proceedings, including intellectual property, breach of contract, securities litigation and product liability suits. In some cases, the claimants seek damages, as well as other relief, which, if granted, could require significant expenditures or impact our ability to sell our products. We are substantially self-insured with respect to general, product liability and securities claims and record losses for claims in excess of purchased insurance in earnings at the time and to the extent they are probable and estimable. In accordance with FASB Statement No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies , we accrue anticipated costs of settlement, damages, loss for product liability claims and, under certain
 
conditions, costs of defense based on historical experience or to the extent specific losses are probable and estimable. Otherwise, we expense these costs as incurred. If the estimate of a probable loss is a range and no amount within the range is more likely, we accrue the minimum amount of the range. Our accrual for legal matters that are probable and estimable was $485 million at December 31, 2006 and $35 million at December 31, 2005. The amounts accrued at December 31, 2006 represent primarily accrued legal defense costs related to assumed Guidant litigation and product liability claims recorded as part of the purchase price. In connection with the acquisition of Guidant, we are still assessing certain assumed litigation and product liability claims to determine the amounts that management believes will be paid as a result of such claims and litigation and, therefore, additional losses may be accrued in the future. See Note J - Commitments and Contingencies for further discussion of our individual material legal proceedings.

Warranty Obligations

We estimate the costs that we may incur under our warranty programs based on historical experience and record a liability at the time product is sold. Factors that affect our warranty liability include the number of units sold, the historical and anticipated rates of warranty claims and the cost per claim. We regularly assess the adequacy of our recorded warranty liabilities and adjust the amounts as necessary. We record a reserve equal to the costs to repair or otherwise satisfy the claim. Expense attributable to warranties was not material to our consolidated statements of operations for 2006, 2005 and 2004.

Costs Associated with Exit Activities

We record employee termination costs in accordance with FASB Statement No. 112, Employer’s Accounting for Postemployment Benefits , if we pay the benefits as part of an ongoing benefit arrangement, which includes benefits provided as part of our domestic severance policy or that we provide in accordance with international statutory requirements. We accrue employee termination costs associated with an ongoing benefit arrangement if the obligation is attributable to prior services rendered, the rights to the benefits have vested and the payment is probable and we can reasonably estimate the liability. We account for employee termination benefits that represent a one-time benefit in accordance with FASB Statement No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. We generally record such costs into expense over the future service period, if any. In addition, in conjunction with an exit activity, we may offer voluntary termination benefits to employees. These benefits are recorded when the employee accepts the termination benefits and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Other costs associated with exit activities may include costs related to leased facilities to be abandoned or subleased and long-lived asset impairments. In addition, we account for costs to exit an activity of an acquired company  and involuntary employee termination benefits and relocation costs associated with acquired businesses in accordance with EITF No. 95-3, Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination .   We include exit costs in the purchase price allocation of the acquired business if a plan to exit an activity of an acquired company exists and those costs have no future economic benefit to us and will be incurred as a direct result of the exit plan, or the exit costs represent amounts to be incurred by us under a contractual obligation of the acquired entity that existed prior to the acquisition date.  We recognize involuntary employee termination benefits and relocation costs as liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date when management approves and commits to a plan of termination, and communicates the termination arrangement to the employees.    

Translation of Foreign Currency

We translate all assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries at the year-end exchange rate and translate sales and expenses at the average exchange rates in effect during the year. We show the net effect of these translation adjustments in the accompanying consolidated financial statements as a component of stockholders’ equity. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included in other, net in our consolidated statements of operations. These gains and losses were not material to our consolidated statements of operations for 2006, 2005, and 2004.

Financial Instruments

We recognize all derivative financial instruments in our consolidated financial statements at fair value, regardless of the purpose or intent for holding the instrument, in accordance with FASB Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities . We record changes in the fair value of derivative instruments in earnings unless we meet hedge accounting criteria. For derivative instruments designated as fair value hedges, we record the changes in fair value of both the derivative instrument and the hedged item in earnings. For derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, we record the effective portions of changes in fair value, net of tax, in other comprehensive income. For derivative instruments designated as net investment hedges, we record the effective portions of changes in fair value in other comprehensive income as part of the cumulative translation adjustment. We recognize any ineffective portion of our hedges in earnings.

The carrying amounts of commercial paper and credit facility borrowings approximate their fair values at December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005. We base the fair value of our fixed-rate long-term debt on market prices. Carrying amounts of floating-rate long-term debt approximate their fair value.

Shipping and Handling Costs

We do not generally bill customers for shipping and handling of our products. Shipping and handling costs of $108 million in 2006, $92 million in 2005 and $72 million in 2004 are included in selling, general and administrative expenses.

Research and Development

We expense research and development costs, including new product development programs, regulatory compliance and clinical research as incurred.

Post-Retirement Benefit Plans

We maintain retirement plans covering our executives, divisional presidents and international employees. The assets, liabilities and costs associated with these plans were not material in 2006, 2005 and 2004.

In connection with our acquisition of Guidant, we sponsor the Guidant Retirement Plan, a frozen noncontributory defined benefit plan, covering a select group of current and former employees. The funding policy for the plan is consistent with U.S. employee benefit and tax-funding regulations. Plan assets, which we maintain in a trust, consist primarily of equity and fixed-income instruments. We also sponsor the Guidant Excess Benefit Plan, a frozen nonqualified plan for certain former officers and employees of Guidant. The Guidant Excess Benefit Plan was funded through a Rabbi Trust that contains segregated company assets used to pay the benefit obligations related to the plan.

In addition, certain former U.S. and Puerto Rico employees of Guidant were eligible to receive Company-paid healthcare retirement benefits.  As part of the Guidant integration and the effort to develop a more scalable, consistent benefit plan Company-wide, these benefits were frozen. Former Guidant employees that met certain criteria as of December 31, 2006 and retired within two years thereafter are eligible to receive the benefits under the plan. 

We use a December 31 measurement date for these plans. The outstanding obligation as of December 31, 2006 is as follows:

( in millions)  
 
Guidant
Retirement
Plan
 
Guidant
Excess
Benefit Plan
 
Healthcare
Retirement
Benefit Plan
 
Projected benefit obligation
 
$
90
 
$
30
 
$
30
 
Fair value of plan assets
   
82
             
Net amount recognized in consolidated balance sheet
 
$
8
 
$
30
 
$
30
 


The weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at December 31, 2006 are as follows:

   
Guidant
Retirement
Plan
 
Guidant
Excess
Benefit Plan
 
Healthcare
Retirement
Benefit Plan
 
Discount rate
   
5.75
%
 
5.75
%
 
5.50
%
Expected return on plan assets
   
7.75
%
           
Healthcare cost trend rate
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
5.00
%
Rate of compensation increase     
4.50
%  
    4.50
%  
     

Net (Loss) Income per Common Share

We base net (loss) income per common share upon the weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding each year. Potential common stock equivalents are determined using the treasury method. We exclude stock options whose effect would be anti-dilutive from the calculation.

New Accounting Standards

In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment , which is a revision of Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation . Statement No. 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and amends Statement No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows . See Note L - Stock Ownership Plans for discussion of our adoption of the standard and its impact on our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006.

In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes , an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes , to create a single model to address accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. Interpretation No. 48 requires the use of a two-step approach for recognizing and measuring tax benefits taken or expected to be taken in a tax return and disclosures regarding uncertainties in income tax positions, including a roll forward of tax benefits taken that do not qualify for financial statement recognition. We will record the cumulative effect of initially adopting Interpretation No. 48 as an adjustment to opening retained earnings in the year of adoption and will present such adjustment separately. Only tax positions that we are more likely than not to realize at the effective date may be recognized upon adoption of Interpretation No. 48. We are required to adopt Interpretation No. 48
 
effective for our first quarter of 2007. We are currently in the process of assessing the impact of the new standard.

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements . Statement No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Statement No. 157 does not require any new fair value measurements; rather, it applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. We are required to apply the provisions of Statement No. 157 prospectively as of January 1, 2008, and recognize any transition adjustment as a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. We are in the process of determining the effect of adoption of Statement No. 157, but we do not believe such adoption will materially impact our future results of operations or financial position.

In September 2006, the SEC released Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements . Bulletin No. 108 expresses the SEC staff’s views regarding the process of quantifying financial statement misstatements. Bulletin No. 108 requires that, in addition to considering the amount of the error originating in the current year statement of operations, the misstatement existing at each balance sheet date should also be considered, irrespective of the period of origin of the error (rollover approach versus iron curtain approach). The registrant must then evaluate whether either approach results in quantifying a misstatement that, when all relevant quantitative and qualitative factors are considered, is material. We adopted Bulletin No. 108 for the year ended December 31, 2006. Our adoption of Bulletin No. 108 did not result in the recording of a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings or any revisions to prior reporting periods since we had previously evaluated misstatements using both the rollover approach and the iron curtain approach, and did not have any material misstatements under either methodology.

Reclassifications

We have reclassified certain prior year amounts to conform to the current year’s presentation, including amounts for prior years included in Note B - Other Balance Sheet Information for accrued expenses and other long-term liabilities ,   Note N - Segment Reporting for reportable segment results , and the operating section of our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows .


Note B—Other Balance Sheet Information

Components of selected captions in our consolidated balance sheets at December 31 are as follows:
 
80


(in millions)
 
2006
 
2005
 
Trade accounts receivable
         
Accounts receivable
 
$
1,561
 
$
1,015
 
Less: allowances
   
137
   
83
 
 
 
$
1,424
 
$
932
 
 
             
Inventories
             
Finished goods
 
$
447
 
$
286
 
Work-in-process
   
145
   
64
 
Raw materials
   
157
   
68
 
 
 
$
749
 
$
418
 
 
             
Property, plant and equipment
             
Land
 
$
115
 
$
76
 
Buildings and improvements
   
827
   
625
 
Equipment, furniture and fixtures
   
1,775
   
1,152
 
 
   
2,717
   
1,853
 
Less: accumulated depreciation
   
991
   
842
 
 
 
$
1,726
 
$
1,011
 
 
             
Accrued expenses
             
Acquisition-related obligations
 
$
428
 
$
369
 
Legal reserves
   
268
   
35
 
Payroll and related liabilities
   
466
   
294
 
Other
   
683
   
426
 
 
 
$
1,845
 
$
1,124
 
               
Other long-term liabilities
             
Legal reserves
 
$
217
       
Other accrued income taxes
   
1,041
 
$
267
 
Other
   
231
   
42
 
   
$
1,489
 
$
309
 

See Note E - Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets for details on our intangible assets.

Note C—Investments in Strategic Alliances

We have entered a significant number of strategic alliances with privately held and publicly traded companies. Many of these alliances involve equity investments in privately held equity securities or investments where an observable quoted market value does not exist. We enter these strategic alliances to broaden our product technology portfolio and to strengthen and expand our reach into existing and new markets. Many of these companies are in the developmental stage and have not yet commenced their principal operations. Our exposure to loss related to our strategic alliances is generally limited to our equity investments and notes receivable associated with these alliances.

Equity investments in strategic alliances at December 31 consist of the following:
 
 

   
2006
 
2005
 
(in millions)
     
Number of Strategic Investments
     
Number of Strategic Investments
 
Available-for-sale investments
                 
Amortized cost
 
$
120
       
$
103
       
Gross unrealized gains
   
36
         
44
       
Gross unrealized losses
   
(10
)
       
(4
)
     
Fair value
 
$
146
   
9
 
$
143
   
5
 
                           
Equity method investments
                         
Cost
 
$
123
       
$
94
       
Equity in losses
   
(28
)
       
(9
)
     
Carrying value
 
$
95
   
4
 
$
85
   
3
 
                           
Cost method investments
                         
Carrying value
 
$
355
   
68
 
$
366
   
58
 
                           
   
$
596
   
81
 
$
594
   
66
 
 
As of December 31, 2006, we held investments totaling $95 million in four companies that we accounted for under the equity method. Our ownership percentages in these companies range from approximately 21 percent to 28 percent. The aggregate value of our equity method investments for which a quoted market price is available is approximately $125 million, for which the associated carrying value is approximately $77 million. The aggregate difference between the carrying value of the investments and the value of our share in the net assets of the investee at the time that we determined that the investments qualified for equity method accounting was approximately $117 million. This difference was attributable primarily to goodwill, which is not being amortized; purchased research and development, which was written-off at the time of application of the equity method of accounting; and intangible assets, which are being amortized over their estimated useful lives ranging from five to 20 years.

As of December 31, 2005, we held investments totaling $85 million in three companies that we accounted for under the equity method. Our ownership percentages in these companies ranged from approximately 21 percent to 28 percent. The aggregate value of our equity method investments for which a quoted market price was available was approximately $207 million, for which the associated carrying value was approximately $63 million. The aggregate difference between the carrying value of the investments and the value of our share in the net assets of the investee at the time that we determined that the investments qualified for equity method accounting was approximately $70 million. This difference is attributable primarily to goodwill, and intangible assets, which are being amortized over their estimated useful lives ranging from five to 20 years.

We regularly review our strategic investments for impairment indicators. Based on this review, we recorded other-than-temporary impairments of approximately $78 million in 2006 related to cost method investments, the most significant impairment related to the termination of a gene therapy trial being conducted by one of our portfolio companies. This trial was suspended in March 2006 and patient enrollment was terminated in April 2006. The remaining carrying value of these cost method investments at December 31, 2006 was $49 million. We determined there was no impairment on the remaining $306 million of our cost method investments. As of December 31, 2006, we recorded other-than-temporary impairments of $4 million associated with
 
certain of our available-for-sale investments. As of December 31, 2006, we had six available-for-sale investments in an unrealized loss position. The duration of the unrealized loss was less than 12 months for each investment. The aggregate carrying value of the investments was $87 million and the aggregate unrealized loss was $10 million. We do not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2006 due to the duration of the unrealized loss position and our ability and intent to hold the investments for a reasonable period sufficient for a recovery of the unrealized loss.

We recorded other-than-temporary impairments of $10 million in 2005 associated with certain cost method investments. The remaining carrying value of these investments at December 31, 2005 was $16 million. We determined there were no impairment indicators present for the remaining $350 million of our cost method investments. We recorded other-than-temporary impairments of $3 million associated with certain of our available-for-sale investments. As of December 31, 2005, we had two available-for-sale investments with an aggregate carrying value of $10 million and unrealized loss position of $4 million. The duration of the unrealized loss position was less than 12 months. We did not consider this investment to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2005 due to the duration of the impairment and our ability and intent to hold the investment for a reasonable period sufficient for a forecasted recovery of the unrealized loss. In addition, during 2005, we wrote-off our $24 million investment in Medinol, Ltd. We canceled our equity investment in conjunction with the litigation settlement with Medinol. The write-down of the Medinol investment is included in litigation-related charges in our consolidated statements of operations.

We had notes receivable of approximately $113 million at December 31, 2006 and $112 million at December 31, 2005 due from privately held and publicly traded companies. We recorded write-downs of notes receivable of $39 million in 2006, related primarily to technological delays and financial deterioration of certain of our vascular sealing and gene therapy portfolio companies. We recorded write-downs of notes receivable of $4 million in 2005.

Over time, we will continue to reprioritize our internal research and development project portfolio and our external investment portfolio. This reprioritization may result in the decision to sell, discontinue, write-down, or otherwise reduce the funding of certain projects, operations, investments or assets. Any proceeds from sales, or any increases in operating cash flows, resulting from subsequent reviews may be used to reduce debt incurred to fund the Guidant acquisition, or may be reinvested in other research and development projects or other operational initiatives. 
 
Note D—Business Combinations
 
During 2006, we paid $28.4 billion to acquire Guidant through a combination of cash, common stock, and fully vested stock options. During 2005, we paid $178 million in cash to acquire TriVascular, Inc., CryoVascular Systems, Inc. and Rubicon Medical Corporation and paid $120 million in shares of our common stock to acquire Advanced Stent Technologies, Inc. (AST). During 2004, we paid $804 million in cash to acquire Advanced Bionics Corporation and Precision Vascular Systems, Inc. (PVS). These acquisitions were intended to strengthen our leadership position in interventional medicine. Our consolidated financial statements include the operating results for each acquired entity from its respective date of acquisition. Given the materiality of the transaction, we have included supplemental pro forma financial information to give effect to the Guidant acquisition as though it had occurred at the beginning of 2006 and 2005 below. Pro forma information is not presented for our other acquisitions given the immateriality of their results to our consolidated financial statements.
 
2006 Business Combinations
 
On April 21, 2006, we acquired 100 percent of the fully diluted equity of Guidant Corporation. Guidant is a world leader in the treatment of cardiac and vascular disease. With this acquisition, we have become a major provider in the more than $9 billion global Cardiac Rhythm Management (CRM) business, enhancing our overall competitive position and long-term growth potential and further diversifying our product portfolio. This acquisition has established us as one of the world’s largest cardiovascular device companies and a global leader in microelectronic therapeutics.

The aggregate purchase price of $28.4 billion included: $14.5 billion in cash; 577 million shares of our common stock at an estimated fair value of $12.5 billion; approximately 40 million of our fully vested stock options granted to Guidant employees at an estimated fair value of approximately $450 million; approximately $100 million associated with the buyout of options of certain former vascular intervention and endovascular solutions Guidant employees; and approximately $800 million of direct acquisition costs, including a $705 million payment made to Johnson & Johnson in connection with the termination of its merger agreement with Guidant. The purchase price net of cash acquired was approximately $21.7 billion. In conjunction with the acquisition, and partially offsetting the purchase price, we acquired approximately $6.7 billion of cash, including $4.1 billion in connection with Guidant’s prior sale of its vascular intervention and endovascular solutions businesses to Abbott. The remaining cash relates to cash on hand at the time of closing. There is no potential contingent consideration payable to the former Guidant shareholders.

Upon the closing of the acquisition, each share of Guidant common stock (other than shares owned by Guidant and Boston Scientific) was converted into (i) $42.00 in cash, (ii) 1.6799 shares of Boston Scientific common stock, and (iii) $0.0132 in cash per share for each day beginning on April 1 through the closing date of April 21, representing an additional $0.28 per share. The number of Boston Scientific shares issued for each Guidant share was based on an exchange ratio determined by dividing $38.00 by the average closing price of Boston Scientific common stock during the 20 consecutive trading day period ending three days prior to the closing date, so long as the average closing price during that period was between $22.62 and $28.86. If the average closing price during that period was below $22.62, the merger agreement specified a fixed exchange ratio of 1.6799 shares of Boston Scientific common stock for each share of Guidant common stock. Because the average closing price of Boston Scientific common stock during that period was less than $22.62, Guidant shareholders received 1.6799 Boston Scientific shares for each share of Guidant common stock.

We measured the fair value of the 577 million shares of our common stock issued as consideration in conjunction with our acquisition of Guidant under Statement No. 141 and EITF No. 99-12, Determination of the Measurement Date for the Market Price of Acquirer Securities Issued in a Purchase Business Combination . We determined the measurement date to be April 17, 2006, the first date on which the average 20-day closing price fell below $22.62 and the number of Boston Scientific shares to be issued according to the exchange ratio became fixed without subsequent revision. We valued the securities based on average market prices a few days before and after the measurement date (beginning on April 12 and ending on April 19), which did not include any dates after the April 21 closing date of the acquisition. The weighted average stock price so determined was $21.68.

To finance the cash portion of the Guidant acquisition, we borrowed $6.6 billion consisting of a $5.0 billion five-year term loan and a $700 million 364-day interim credit facility loan from a syndicate of commercial and investment banks, as well as a $900 million subordinated loan from Abbott. See Note F - Borrowings and Credit Arrangements for further details regarding the debt issued to finance the cash portion of the Guidant acquisition.

We made our offer to acquire Guidant after the execution of a merger agreement between Guidant and Johnson & Johnson. On January 25, 2006, Guidant terminated the Johnson & Johnson merger agreement and, in connection with the termination, Guidant paid Johnson & Johnson a termination fee of $705 million. We then reimbursed Guidant for the full amount of the termination fee paid to Johnson & Johnson.

We continue to incur integration and restructuring costs as we integrate certain operations of Guidant.

Abbott Transaction
 
On April 21, 2006, before the closing of the Boston Scientific-Guidant transaction, Abbott acquired Guidant’s vascular intervention and endovascular solutions businesses for:
 
·  
an initial payment of $4.1 billion in cash at the Abbott transaction closing;
 
·  
a milestone payment of $250 million upon receipt of an approval from the U.S. FDA within ten years after the Abbott transaction closing to market and sell an everolimus-eluting stent in the U.S.; and
 
·  
a milestone payment of $250 million upon receipt of an approval from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare within ten years after the Abbott transaction closing to market and sell an everolimus-eluting stent in Japan.
 
In addition, Abbott loaned us $900 million on a subordinated basis. See Note F - Borrowings and Credit Arrangements for further details regarding the Abbott loan.

Further, Abbott purchased from us approximately 65 million shares of our common stock for $1.4 billion, or $21.66 per share. Abbott agreed not to sell any of these shares of common stock for six months following the transaction closing unless the average price per share of our common stock over any consecutive 20-day trading period during that six-month period exceeded $30.00. In addition, during the 18-month period following the transaction closing, Abbott will not, in any one-month period, sell more than 8.33 percent of these shares of our common stock. Abbott must sell all of these shares of our common stock no later than 30 months following April 21, 2006 and must apply a portion of the net proceeds from its sale of these shares of our common stock in excess of specified amounts, if any, to reduce the principal amount of the loan from Abbott to Boston Scientific (sharing of proceeds feature).

We determined the fair value of the sharing of proceeds feature of the Abbott stock purchase as of April 21, 2006 to be $103 million and recorded this amount as an asset received in connection with the sale of the Guidant vascular intervention and endovascular solutions business to Abbott. We revalue this instrument each reporting period, and recorded net expense of approximately $95 million during 2006 to reflect the change in fair value. We will record fair value adjustments on this feature until all of the underlying shares are sold by Abbott. As of December 31, 2006, we
 
have an asset of approximately $8 million remaining, which reflects the estimated fair value of this feature as of December 31, 2006.

We used a Monte Carlo simulation methodology in determining the value of the sharing of proceeds feature. We estimated the fair values on December 31, 2006 and April 21, 2006 using the following assumptions:

   
December 31,
2006
 
April 21,
2006
 
BSX stock price
 
$
17.18
 
$
22.49
 
Expected volatility
   
30.00
%
 
30.00
%
Risk-free interest rate
   
4.79
%
 
4.90
%
Credit spread
   
0.35
%
 
0.35
%
Expected dividend yield
   
0.00
%
 
0.00
%
Contractual term to expiration
   
1.8 years
   
2.5 years
 
Notional shares
   
64,635,272
   
64,635,272
 

Approximately 18 months following the Abbott transaction closing, we will issue to Abbott additional shares of our common stock having an aggregate value of up to $60 million (based on the average closing price of our common stock during the 20 consecutive trading day period ending five trading days prior to the date of issuance of those shares) to reimburse Abbott for the cost of borrowing $1.4 billion to purchase the shares of our common stock. We have recorded the $60 million of stock to be issued as a liability assumed in connection with the sale of Guidant’s vascular intervention and endovascular solutions businesses to Abbott.

Prior to the Abbott transaction closing, Boston Scientific and Abbott entered into transition services agreements under which (i) we will provide or make available to the Guidant vascular and endovascular solutions businesses acquired by Abbott those services, rights, properties and assets of Guidant that were not included in the assets purchased by Abbott and that are reasonably required by Abbott to enable them to conduct the Guidant vascular and endovascular solutions businesses substantially as conducted at the time of the Abbott transaction closing; and (ii) Abbott will provide or make available to us those services, rights, properties and assets reasonably required by Boston Scientific to enable it to conduct the business conducted by Guidant, other than the Guidant vascular and endovascular solutions businesses, in substantially the same manner as conducted as of the Abbott transaction closing, to the extent those services, rights, properties and assets were included in the assets purchased by Abbott. These transition services are available at prices based on costs incurred in performing the services. Many of these transition services agreements expire during 2007.

Purchase Price

We have accounted for the acquisition of Guidant as a purchase under U.S. GAAP. Under the purchase method of accounting, we recorded the assets and liabilities of Guidant as of the acquisition date, at their respective fair values, and consolidated them with those of legacy Boston Scientific. The purchase price is based upon preliminary estimates of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. We are in the process of gathering information to finalize our valuation of certain assets and liabilities, primarily the determination of amounts that may be paid as a result of assumed product liability claims. We will finalize the purchase price allocation once we have the necessary information to complete our estimate, but generally no later than one year from the acquisition date. The preparation of the valuation required the use of significant assumptions and estimates. Critical estimates included, but were not limited to, future expected
 
cash flows and the applicable discount rates as of the date of the acquisition. We based these estimates on assumptions that we believed to be reasonable as of the date of the acquisition. However, actual results may differ from these estimates. 

The preliminary purchase price is as follows (in millions):

Consideration to Guidant
     
Cash portion of consideration
 
$
14,527
 
Fair value of Boston Scientific common stock
   
12,514
 
Fair value of Boston Scientific options exchanged for Guidant stock options
   
450
 
Buyout of options for certain former employees
   
97
 
     
27,588
 
Other acquisition-related costs
       
Johnson & Johnson termination fee
   
705
 
Other direct acquisition costs
   
65
 
   
$
28,358
 
 
The fair value of the Boston Scientific stock options exchanged for Guidant options was included in the purchase price due to the fact that the options were fully vested. We estimated the fair value of these options using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. We estimated the fair value of the stock options assuming no expected dividends and the following weighted-average assumptions:

Expected term (in years)
   
2.4
 
Expected volatility
   
30
%
Risk-free interest rate
   
4.92
%
Stock price on date of grant
 
$
22.49
 
Weighted-average exercise price
 
$
13.11
 

Preliminary Purchase Price Allocation

The following chart summarizes the Guidant preliminary purchase price allocation (in millions) :

Cash
 
$
6,708
 
Intangible assets subject to amortization
   
7,719
 
Goodwill
   
12,354
 
Other assets
   
2,255
 
Purchased research and development
   
4,169
 
Current liabilities
   
(1,803
)
Net deferred income taxes
   
(2,549
)
Other long-term liabilities
   
(495
)
   
$
28,358
 

The deferred tax liabilities relate primarily to the tax impact of future amortization associated with the identified intangible assets acquired, which are not deductible for tax purposes.

We allocated the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net tangible assets acquired to specific intangible asset categories as follows:
 
   
Amount
Assigned
(in millions)
 
Weighted Average Amortization Period
(in years)
 
Risk-Adjusted Discount Rates used in Purchase Price Allocation
 
Amortizable intangible assets
                   
Technology - core
 
$
6,142
   
25
   
10%-16 %
 
Technology - developed
   
885
   
6
   
10%
 
Customer relationships
   
688
   
15
   
10%-13%
 
Other
   
4
   
10
   
10%
 
   
$
7,719
   
22
       
                     
Goodwill
 
$
12,354
             
Purchased research and development
   
4,169
         
13%-17%
 
 
We believe that the estimated intangible assets and purchased research and development so determined represent the fair value at the date of acquisition and do not exceed the amount a third party would pay for the assets. We used the income approach to determine the fair value of the amortizable intangible assets and purchased research and development. We valued and accounted for the identified intangible assets and purchased research and development in accordance with our policy as described in Note A - Significant Accounting Policies .

Various factors contributed to the establishment of goodwill, including: the strategic benefit of entering the CRM market and diversifying our product portfolio; the value of Guidant’s highly trained assembled workforce as of the acquisition date; the expected revenue growth over time that is attributable to expanded indications and increased market penetration from future products and customers; the incremental value to our existing interventional cardiology franchise from having two drug-eluting stent platforms; and the synergies expected to result from combining infrastructures, reducing combined operational spend and program reprioritization. The goodwill acquired in the Guidant acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes. We have allocated the goodwill to our reportable segments as follows: $7.642 billion to the U.S., $3.7 billion to Europe, $625 million to Inter-Continental and $387 million to Japan. We allocated goodwill by business segment based on the relative enterprise fair value of each segment at the date of acquisition.

The core technology consists of technical processes, intellectual property, and institutional understanding with respect to products or processes that have been developed by Guidant and that will be leveraged in future products or processes. Core technology represents know-how, patented and unpatented technology, testing methodologies and hardware that will be carried forward from one product generation to the next. Over 90 percent of the value assigned to core technology is associated with Guidant’s CRM products and includes battery and capacitor technology, lead technology, software algorithms, and interfacing for shocking and pacing.

The developed technology acquired from Guidant represents the value associated with currently marketed products that have received FDA approval as of the acquisition date. Guidant’s currently marketed products include:
 
·  
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator systems used to detect and treat abnormally fast heart rhythms (tachycardia) that could result in sudden cardiac death, including implantable cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator systems used to treat heart failure;
 
·  
Implantable pacemaker systems used to manage slow or irregular heart rhythms (bradycardia), including implantable cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker systems used to treat heart failure; and
 
·  
Cardiac surgery systems used to perform cardiac surgical ablation, endoscopic vein harvesting and clampless beating-heart bypass surgery.

The currently marketed products include products primarily within the Insignia, Prizm, Vitality, Contak TR and Contak Renewal CRM product families, the VASOVIEW ® Endoscopic Vein Harvesting System, FLEX Microwave Systems and the ACROBAT™ System.

Customer relationships represent the estimated fair value of the non-contractual customer relationships Guidant had with physician customers as of the acquisition date. The primary physician users of Guidant’s largest selling products include electrophysiologists, implanting cardiologists, cardiovascular surgeons, and cardiac surgeons. These relationships were valued separately from goodwill as Guidant (i) has information about and has regular contact with its physician customers and (ii) the physician customers have the ability to make direct contact with Guidant. We used the income approach to estimate the fair value of customer relationships as of the acquisition date.

Pro Forma Results of Operations
 
Our consolidated financial statements include Guidant’s operating results from the date of acquisition, April 21, 2006. The following unaudited pro forma information presents a summary of consolidated results of our operations and Guidant, as if the acquisition, the Abbott transaction and the financing for the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of each of the periods presented. We have adjusted the historical consolidated financial information to give effect to pro forma events that are (i) directly attributable to the acquisition and (ii) factually supportable. We present the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information for informational purposes only. The pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of what the financial position or results of operations actually would have been had the acquisition, the sale of the Guidant vascular and endovascular solutions businesses to Abbott and the financing transactions with Abbott and other lenders been completed at the dates indicated. In addition, the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information does not purport to project the future financial position or operating results of the combined Company after completion of the acquisition. Pro forma adjustments are tax-effected at our effective tax rate.


   
 
 
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
(in millions, except per share data)
 
2006
 
2005
 
   
Unaudited
 
           
Net sales
 
$
8,533
 
$
8,739
 
Net loss
   
(3,916
)
 
(4,287
)
               
Net loss per share - basic
 
$
(2.66
)
$
(2.92
)
Net loss per share - assuming dilution
 
$
(2.66
)
$
(2.92
)
 
The pro forma net loss includes amortization expense associated with intangible assets obtained in conjunction with the Guidant acquisition of $480 million for 2006 and 2005. The unaudited pro forma financial information for each period presented also includes the following non-recurring charges: purchased research and development of $4.169 billion obtained as part of the Guidant acquisition; $267 million in expense associated with the step-up value of acquired inventory sold; a tax charge for the drug-eluting stent license right obtained from Abbott; and $95 million for the fair value adjustment related to the sharing of proceeds feature of the Abbott stock purchase. In connection with the accounting for the acquisition of Guidant, we wrote-up inventory acquired from manufacturing cost to fair value. As of December 31, 2006, we had no inventory step-up value remaining in inventory.
 
Costs Associated with Exit Activities
 
As of December 31, 2006, we included in the Guidant purchase price allocation an accrual for $198 million in acquisition-related costs that included: approximately $173 million for involuntary terminations, change-in-control payments, relocation and related costs; and approximately $25 million of estimated costs to cancel contractual commitments.
 
As of the acquisition date, management began to assess and formulate plans to exit certain Guidant activities. As a result of these exit plans, we will make severance, relocation and change-in-control payments. The majority of the exit cost accrual relates to our plan to reduce the acquired CRM workforce by approximately 500 to 600 employees during the first quarter of 2007. The affected workforce included primarily research and development employees, although employees within sales and marketing and certain other functions were also impacted. We also plan to make smaller workforce reductions internationally across multiple functions in order to eliminate duplicate facilities and rationalize our distribution network in certain countries. We are in the process of gathering information to finalize these integration activities.

The components of our accrual for Guidant-related exit and other costs are as follows:
 
(in millions)
 
Purchase Price Adjustments
 
Charges Utilized in 2006
 
Balance at December 31, 2006
 
Workforce reductions
 
$
190
 
$
(27
)
$
163
 
Relocation costs
   
15
   
(5
)
 
10
 
Contractual commitments
   
30
   
(5
)
 
25
 
   
$
235
 
$
(37
)
$
198
 

2 005 Business Combinations
 
In March 2005, we acquired 100 percent of the fully diluted equity of AST for approximately 3.6 million shares of our common stock, which was valued at approximately $120 million on the date of acquisition. We may also be required to make earn-out payments in the future that are contingent upon AST achieving certain regulatory and performance-related milestones. AST is a developer of stent delivery systems that are designed to address coronary artery disease in bifurcated vessels. The acquisition was intended to provide us with an expanded stent technology and intellectual property portfolio.
 
In April 2005, we acquired 100 percent of the fully diluted equity of TriVascular for approximately $65 million in addition to our previous investments and notes issued of approximately $45 million. TriVascular is a developer of medical devices and procedures used for treating abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). The acquisition was intended to expand our vascular surgery technology portfolio. During the second quarter of 2006, management cancelled the TriVascular AAA stent-graft program. The program cancellation was due principally to forecasted increases in time and costs to complete the development of the stent-graft and to receive regulatory approval. The cancellation of the TriVascular AAA program resulted in the shutdown of our facility in Santa Rosa, California and the displacement of approximately 300 employees. During the second quarter of 2006, we recorded a charge to research and development expenses of approximately $20 million associated primarily with write-downs of fixed assets and a charge to research and development expenses of approximately $10 million associated with severance and related costs incurred in connection with the cancellation of the TriVascular AAA program. In addition, we recorded an impairment charge related to the remaining TriVascular intangible assets and reversed our accrual for contingent payments recorded in the initial purchase accounting. The effect of the write-off of these assets and liabilities was a $23 million charge to amortization expense and a $67 million credit to purchased research and development during the second quarter of 2006. We substantially completed the shutdown activities during the third quarter of 2006.
 
In April 2005, we acquired 100 percent of the fully diluted equity of CryoVascular for approximately $50 million in addition to our previous investments of approximately $10 million. We may also be required to make earn-out payments in the future that are contingent upon CryoVascular achieving certain performance related-milestones. CryoVascular is a developer and manufacturer of a proprietary angioplasty device to treat atherosclerotic disease of the legs and other peripheral arteries, which we previously distributed. The acquisition was intended to expand our peripheral vascular technology portfolio.
 
In June 2005, we completed our acquisition of 100 percent of the fully diluted equity of Rubicon for approximately $70 million in addition to our previous investments of approximately $20 million. We may also be required to make earn-out payments in the future that are contingent upon Rubicon achieving certain regulatory and performance related-milestones. Rubicon is a developer of embolic protection filters for use in interventional cardiovascular procedures. The acquisition was intended to strengthen our leadership position in interventional cardiovascular procedures. In 2006, we wrote off $21 million of the intangible assets to amortization expense associated with developed technology obtained as part of the acquisition. The write-off of the Rubicon developed technology resulted from a management decision to redesign the first generation of the technology and concentrate resources on the commercialization of the second-generation product.
 
2004 Business Combinations
 
On June 1, 2004, we completed our acquisition of 100 percent of the fully diluted equity of Advanced Bionics for an initial payment of approximately $740 million in cash, plus possible future earn-out payments. Advanced Bionics develops implantable microelectronic technologies for treating numerous neurological disorders. Its neuromodulation technology includes a range of neurostimulators (or implantable pulse generators), programmable drug pumps and cochlear implants. The Advanced Bionics acquisition was intended to expand our technology portfolio into the implantable microelectronic device market.
 
The Advanced Bionics acquisition was structured to include earn-out payments that are contingent primarily on the achievement of future performance milestones. The performance milestones are segmented by Advanced Bionics’ four principal technology platforms (cochlear implants, implantable pulse generators, drug pumps and bion microstimulators) and each milestone has a specific earn-out period, which generally commences on the date of the related product launch. Base earn-out payments on these performance milestones approximate two-and-a-quarter times incremental sales for each annual period. There are also bonus earn-out payments available based on the attainment of certain aggregate sales performance targets and a certain gross margin level. The milestones associated with the contingent consideration must be reached in certain periods through 2013. The estimated potential amount of future contingent consideration (undiscounted) that we could be required to make associated with our acquisition of Advanced Bionics is approximately $3 billion. The estimated cumulative revenue level (undiscounted) to be generated by Advanced Bionics during the remaining earnout period is approximately $7 billion. We will allocate these payments, if made, to goodwill.
 
On April 2, 2004, we completed our acquisition of the remaining outstanding shares of PVS for an initial payment of approximately $75 million in cash. We may also be required to make earn-out payments in the future that are contingent upon PVS achieving certain performance-related milestones. PVS develops and manufactures guidewires and microcatheter technology for use in accessing the brain, the heart and other areas of the anatomy. The acquisition of PVS was intended to provide us with additional vascular access technology.
 
Contingent Consideration
 
Certain of our business combinations involve the payment of contingent consideration. In accordance with Statement No. 142, we establish a contingent consideration liability at the acquisition date if the sum of the fair value assigned to assets acquired (including purchased research and development) and liabilities assumed exceed the initial cost of the acquired entity. The liability established equals the lesser of the maximum amount of the potential contingent consideration or the excess fair value. Payment of the additional consideration is generally contingent upon the acquired companies’ reaching certain performance milestones, including attaining specified revenue levels, achieving product development targets or obtaining regulatory approvals.
 
During 2006, we paid $397 million for acquisition-related payments associated primarily with Advanced Bionics, CryoVascular and Smart Therapeutics, Inc. As of December 31, 2006, we had accrued approximately $220 million for acquisition-related payments, of which we paid approximately $200 million to the former shareholders of Advanced Bionics during the first quarter of 2007. During 2005, we paid $33 million for acquisition-related payments associated primarily with Catheter Innovations, Inc., Smart and Embolic Protection, Inc. (EPI). As of December 31, 2005, we had accrued $268 million for acquisition-related payments. In addition, as of December 31, 2005, we had recorded a liability of $89 million to account for the excess of
 
the fair value of the assets acquired over the initial purchase price for certain of our acquisitions. During 2004, we paid $107 million for acquisition-related payments associated primarily with EPI, Smart and InFlow Dynamics, Inc.
 
Certain earn-out payments are based on multiples of the acquired company’s revenue during the earn-out period and, consequently, we cannot currently determine the total payments. However, we have developed an estimate of the maximum potential contingent consideration for each of our acquisitions with an outstanding earn-out obligation. At December 31, 2006, the estimated maximum potential amount of future contingent consideration (undiscounted) that we could be required to make associated with our business combinations is approximately $4 billion, some of which may be payable in common stock, and which includes approximately $3 billion of estimated payments to Advanced Bionics. The milestones associated with the contingent consideration must be reached in certain future periods ranging from 2007 through 2016. The estimated cumulative specified revenue level associated with these maximum future contingent payments is approximately $10 billion, which includes approximately $7 billion for Advanced Bionics.
 
During the first quarter of 2007, we acquired EndoTex Interventional Systems, Inc., a developer of stents used in the treatment of stenotic lesions in the carotid arteries. We issued approximately five million shares valued at approximately $90 million and approximately $10 million in cash to acquire the remaining interests of EndoTex and may be required to pay future consideration that is contingent upon EndoTex achieving certain performance-related milestones.
 
Purchased Research and Development
 
During 2006, we recorded $4.119 billion of purchased research and development. This amount included a charge of approximately $4.169 billion associated with the purchased research and development obtained in conjunction with the Guidant acquisition; a credit of approximately $67 million resulting primarily from the reversal of accrued contingent payments due to the cancellation of the TriVascular AAA program; and an expense of approximately $17 million resulting primarily from the application of equity method accounting for our investment in EndoTex.

The $4.169 billion of purchased research and development associated with the Guidant acquisition consists primarily of approximately $3.26 billion for acquired CRM-related products and approximately $540 million for drug-eluting stent technology shared with Abbott. The purchased research and development value associated with the Guidant acquisition also includes approximately $369 million that represents the estimated fair value of the potential milestone payments of up to $500 million that we may receive from Abbott upon receipt of certain regulatory approvals by the vascular intervention and endovascular solutions businesses it acquired from Guidant. We recorded the amounts as purchased research and development at the acquisition date because the receipt of the payments is dependent on future research and development activity and regulatory approvals, and the asset has no alternative future use as of the acquisition date. We will recognize the milestone payments, if received, as a gain in our financial statements at the time of receipt.

The most significant purchased research and development projects acquired from Guidant include the Frontier CRM technology and rights to the everolimus-eluting stent technology that we share with Abbott. The Frontier CRM technology represents Guidant’s next-generation pulse generator platform that will incorporate new components and software while leveraging
 
certain existing intellectual property, technology, manufacturing know-how and institutional knowledge of Guidant. We expect to leverage this platform across all CRM product lines to treat electrical dysfunction in the heart. We expect to launch various Frontier-based products commercially in the U.S. over the next 36 months, subject to regulatory approval. As of December 31, 2006, we estimate that the total cost to complete the Frontier CRM technology is between $150 million and $200 million. We expect material cash flows from Frontier-based products to commence in 2008.

The $540 million attributable to the everolimus-eluting stent technology represents the estimated fair value of the rights to Guidant’s everolimus-based drug-eluting stent technology we share with Abbott. In December 2006, we launched PROMUS , our first-generation everolimus-based stent, supplied by Abbott, in limited quantities in Europe. We expect to launch a first-generation everolimus-based stent, supplied by Abbott, in the U.S. in 2008, subject to regulatory approval. We expect to launch an internally manufactured next-generation everolimus-based stent in Europe in 2010 and in the U.S. in 2011. We expect that material net cash inflows (net of operating costs, including research and development costs to complete) from our internally manufactured everolimus-based drug-eluting stent will commence in 2010 or 2011, following its approval in Europe and in the U.S. As of December 31, 2006, we estimate that the cost to complete our next-generation everolimus-eluting stent technology project is between $200 million and $250 million. The in-process projects acquired in conjunction with the Guidant acquisition are generally progressing in line with our estimates as of the acquisition date.

In 2005, we recorded $276 million of purchased research and development. Our 2005 purchased research and development consisted of: $130 million relating to our acquisition of TriVascular; $73 million relating to our acquisition of AST; $45 million relating to our acquisition of Rubicon; and $3 million relating to our acquisition of CryoVascular. In addition, we recorded $25 million of purchased research and development in conjunction with obtaining distribution rights for new brain monitoring technology that Aspect Medical Systems, one of our strategic partners, is currently developing. This technology is designed to aid the diagnosis and treatment of depression, Alzheimer’s disease and other neurological conditions.

The most significant 2005 purchased research and development projects included TriVascular’s AAA stent-graft and AST’s Petal™ bifurcation stent, which collectively represented 73 percent of our 2005 purchased research and development. During the second quarter of 2006, management cancelled the TriVascular AAA stent-graft program. AST’s Petal bifurcation stent is designed to expand into the side vessel where a single vessel branches into two vessels, permitting blood to flow into both branches of the bifurcation and providing support at the junction. We estimate the remaining cost to complete the Petal bifurcation stent to be between $100 million and $125 million. We expect material net cash inflows from the Petal bifurcation stent to begin in 2011, which is when we expect the stent to be commercially available in the U.S. in a drug-eluting configuration. The AST Petal bifurcation stent in-process project is generally progressing in line with our estimates as of the acquisition date.
 
In 2004, we recorded $65 million of purchased research and development. Our 2004 purchased research and development consisted primarily of $50 million relating to our acquisitions of Advanced Bionics and $14 million relating to our acquisition of PVS. The most significant in-process projects acquired in connection with our 2004 acquisitions included Advanced Bionics’ bion® microstimulator and drug delivery pump, which collectively represented 77 percent of our
 
2004 acquired in-process projects’ value. The bion microstimulator is an implantable neurostimulation device designed to treat a variety of neurological conditions. We estimate the remaining cost to complete the bion microstimulator for migraine headaches to be approximately $35 million. We expect material cash flows from the bion microstimulator to commence in 2011, following its approval in the U.S., which we expect to occur in 2010. The Advanced Bionics drug delivery pump is an implanted programmable device designed to treat chronic pain. We estimate the remaining cost to complete the drug delivery pump to be between $50 million and $60 million. We continue to assess the pace and risk of development of the drug delivery pump, as well as general market opportunities for the pump, which may result in a delay in the timing of regulatory approval or lower potential market value. We currently expect material net cash inflows from the drug delivery pump to commence in 2012, following its approval in the U.S., which we expect to occur in 2011 or 2012. The estimated timing and costs to complete the bion microstimulator and the drug delivery pump have increased relative to what we estimated as of the acquisition date; however, we do not believe these increases will have a material impact on our results of operations or financial condition.
 
Note E—Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
 
The gross carrying amount of goodwill and intangible assets and the related accumulated amortization for intangible assets subject to amortization at December 31 are as follows:

   
2006
 
2005
 
(in millions)
 
Gross Carrying Amount
 
Accumulated Amortization
 
Gross Carrying Amount
 
Accumulated Amortization
 
Amortizable intangible assets
                 
Technology - core
 
$
6,909
 
$
292
 
$
829
 
$
86
 
Technology - developed
   
1,338
   
441
   
453
   
244
 
Patents
   
583
   
244
   
547
   
209
 
Customer relationships
   
765
   
58
   
73
   
22
 
Other intangible assets
   
214
   
122
   
208
   
108
 
   
$
9,809
 
$
1,157
 
$
2,110
 
$
669
 
                         
Goodwill
 
$
14,628
       
$
1,938
       
Technology - core
   
356
         
356
       
   
$
14,984
       
$
2,294
       
 
Our core technology that is not subject to amortization represents technical processes, intellectual property and/or institutional understanding acquired through business combinations that is fundamental to the ongoing operation of our business and has no limit to its useful life. Our core technology that is not subject to amortization is comprised primarily of certain purchased stent and balloon technology, which is foundational to our continuing operation within the interventional cardiology market and other markets within interventional medicine. We amortize all other core technology over its estimated useful life.

Estimated amortization expense for each of the five succeeding fiscal years based upon our intangible asset portfolio at December 31, 2006 is as follows:


 
 
Estimated
Amortization
Expense
  (in millions)
 
2007
 
$
608
 
2008
   
566
 
2009
   
545
 
2010
   
533
 
2011
   
439
 
 
Goodwill as of December 31 as allocated by our reportable segments is as follows:
(in millions)
 
United States
 
Europe
 
Japan
 
Inter-Continental
 
Balance as of December 31, 2004
 
$
1,440
 
$
160
 
$
55
 
$
57
 
Purchase price adjustments
   
(35
)
 
(4
)
 
(1
)
 
(2
)
Goodwill acquired
   
19
   
3
   
3
   
9
 
Contingent consideration
   
189
   
26
   
5
   
14
 
Balance as of December 31, 2005
 
$
1,613
 
$
185
 
$
62
 
$
78
 
Purchase price adjustments
   
(4
)
                 
Goodwill acquired
   
7,642
   
3,700
   
387
   
625
 
Contingent consideration
   
278
   
40
   
5
   
17
 
Balance as of December 31, 2006
 
$
9,529
 
$
3,925
 
$
454
 
$
720
 
 
The 2006 and 2005 purchase price adjustments relate primarily to adjustments to reflect the fair value of deferred tax assets and liabilities acquired in connection with current year and prior year acquisitions properly.

Note F—Borrowings and Credit Arrangements

We had outstanding borrowings of $8.902 billion at December 31, 2006 at a weighted average interest rate of 6.03 percent as compared to outstanding borrowings of $2.02 billion at December 31, 2005 at a weighted average interest rate of 4.8 percent. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, our borrowings consisted of the following:
 
 

(in millions)
 
2006
 
2005
 
Commercial paper
     
$ 149
 
Other current debt obligations
 
$
7
   
7
 
     
7
   
156
 
               
Term loan
   
5,000
       
Abbott loan
   
900
       
Senior notes
   
3,050
   
1,850
 
Fair value adjustment *
   
(12
)
 
14
 
Discounts
   
(52
)
 
(7
)
Other
   
9
   
7
 
     
8,895
   
1,864
 
               
   
$
8,902
 
$
2,020
 

*
Represents unamortized (losses) gains on interest rate swaps used to hedge the fair value of certain of our senior notes. See Note G - Financial Instruments for further discussion regarding the treatment of our interest rate swaps.

The debt maturity schedule for our term loan, Abbott loan, and senior notes as of December 31, 2006 is as follows:

   
Payments Due by Period  
     
(in millions)
 
2008
 
2009
 
2010
 
2011
 
Thereafter
 
Total
 
Term loan
 
$
650
 
$
650
 
$
1,700
 
$
2,000
       
$
5,000
 
Abbott loan
                     
900
         
900
 
Senior notes
                     
850
 
$
2,200
   
3,050
 
   
$
650
 
$
650
 
$
1,700
 
$
3,750
 
$
2,200
 
$
8,950
 
 
Guidant Financing

In April 2006, to finance the cash portion of the Guidant acquisition, we borrowed $6.6 billion, consisting of a $5.0 billion five-year term loan and a $700 million 364-day interim credit facility loan from a syndicate of commercial and investment banks, as well as a $900 million subordinated loan from Abbott. In addition, we terminated our existing revolving credit facilities and established a new $2.0 billion revolving credit facility. In May 2006, we repaid and terminated the $700 million 364-day interim credit facility loan. We are permitted to prepay the term loan and Abbott loan prior to maturity with no penalty or premium.

The term loan and revolving credit facility bear interest at LIBOR plus an interest margin of 0.725 percent. The interest margin is based on the highest two out of three of our long-term, senior unsecured, corporate credit ratings from Fitch Ratings, Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. and Standard & Poor’s Rating Services (S&P). As of December 31, 2006, our credit ratings were BBB from Fitch; Baa3 from Moody’s; and BBB from S&P. These credit ratings are investment grade. The Moody’s and S&P ratings outlook is currently negative.

The $900 million loan from Abbott bears interest at a fixed 4.0 percent, payable semi-annually. We determined that an appropriate fair market interest rate on the loan from Abbott is 5.25
 
percent per annum. We recorded the loan at a discount of approximately $50 million and will record interest at an imputed rate of 5.25 percent over the term of the loan. 

Additionally, in June 2006, under our shelf registration previously filed with the SEC, we issued $1.2 billion of publicly registered senior notes. See the Senior Notes section of this note for the terms of this issuance.

Our revolving credit facility and term loan agreement requires that we maintain a ratio of debt to pro forma EBITDA, as defined by the agreement, of less than or equal to 4.5 to 1.0 through December 31, 2007 and 3.5 to 1.0 thereafter. The agreement also requires that we maintain a ratio of pro forma EBITDA, as defined by the agreement, to interest expense of greater than or equal to 3.0 to 1.0. As of December 31, 2006, we were in compliance with both of these debt covenants. Exiting 2006, our ratio of debt to pro forma EBITDA was 3.6 to 1.0 and the ratio of pro forma EBITDA to interest expense was 5.6 to 1.0. Any breach of these covenants would require that we obtain waivers from our lenders and there can be no assurance that our lenders would grant such waivers.

Credit Facilities

At December 31, 2006 and 2005, our revolving credit facilities totaled approximately $2.0 billion. Use of the borrowings is unrestricted and the borrowings are unsecured. Our credit facilities provide borrowing capacity and support our commercial paper program. In March 2006, we repaid $149 million in commercial paper borrowings that were outstanding at December 31, 2005 at a weighted average interest rate of 4.11 percent. In September 2005, we repaid 45 billion Japanese yen (approximately $400 million) in credit facility borrowings outstanding at a weighted average interest rate of 0.37 percent.

We maintain a credit and security facility secured by our U.S. trade receivables that terminates in 2007. During the first quarter of 2006, we increased this facility from $100 million to $350 million. Borrowing availability under this facility changes based upon the amount of eligible receivables, concentration of eligible receivables and other factors. Certain significant changes in the quality of our receivables may require us to repay borrowings immediately under the facility. The credit agreement required us to create a wholly owned entity, which we consolidate. This entity purchases our U.S. trade accounts receivable and then borrows from two third-party financial institutions using these receivables as collateral. The receivables and related borrowings remain on our consolidated balance sheets because we have the right to prepay any borrowings outstanding and effectively retain control over the receivables. Accordingly, pledged receivables are included as trade accounts receivable, net, while the corresponding borrowings are included as debt on our consolidated balance sheets.

There were no amounts outstanding against our available credit lines of $2.35 billion at December 31, 2006.

In addition, we have uncommitted credit facilities with two commercial Japanese banks that provide for borrowings and promissory notes discounting of up to 15 billion Japanese yen (translated to approximately $127 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005). We discounted $103 million of notes receivable as of December 31, 2006 and $109 million as of December 31, 2005 at an average interest rate of 0.75 percent.

At December 31, 2006, we had outstanding letters of credit and bank guarantees of approximately $90 million, which consisted primarily of financial lines of credit provided by banks and
 
collateral for workers’ compensation programs. We enter these letters of credit and bank guarantees in the normal course of business. As of December 31, 2006, we had not drawn any amounts on the letters of credit or guarantees. At this time, we do not believe we will be required to fund or draw any amounts from the guarantees or letters of credit and, accordingly, we have not recognized a related liability in our financial statements as of December 31, 2006. Our letters of credit and bank guarantees were immaterial at December 31, 2005.
 
Senior Notes

We had senior notes of $3.05 billion outstanding at December 31, 2006 and $1.85 billion outstanding at December 31, 2005. These notes are publicly registered securities, which are redeemable prior to maturity and are not subject to any sinking fund requirements. Our senior notes are unsecured, unsubord in ated obligations and rank on a parity with each other. These notes rank junior to our secured debt, which include our $5.0 billion five-year term loan, and have senior priority to our subordinated indebtedness, which includes our $900 million note from Abbott. Our senior notes at December 31, 2006 consist of the following:
 
   
Amount
(in millions)
 
Issuance
Date
 
Maturity Date
 
Semi-annual
Coupon Rate
 
                   
January 2011 Notes
 
$
250
   
November 2004
   
January 2011
   
4.25%
 
June 2011 Notes  
   
600
   
June 2006
   
June 2011
   
6.0%
 
June 2014 Notes
   
600
   
June 2004
   
June 2014
   
5.45%
 
November 2015 Notes
   
400
   
November 2005
   
November 2015
   
5.5%
 
June 2016 Notes
   
600
   
June 2006
   
June 2016
   
6.4%
 
January 2017 Notes
   
250
   
November 2004
   
January 2017
   
5.125%
 
November 2035 Notes
   
350
   
November 2005
   
November 2035
   
6.25%
 
                           
 
In April 2006, we increased the interest rate payable on our November 2015 and November 2035 notes by 0.75 percent in connection with the downgrading of our credit ratings as a result of the Guidant acquisition. Subsequent rating improvements may result in a decrease in the adjusted interest rate. The interest rate on the date these senior notes were originally issued will be permanently reinstated if and when the lowest credit ratings assigned to these senior notes is either A- or A3 or higher.

Note G—Financial Instruments

Carrying amounts and fair values of our financial instruments at December 31 are as follows:
 
   
2006
 
2005
 
(in millions)
 
Carrying Amount
 
Fair Value
 
Carrying Amount
 
Fair Value
 
Assets
                 
Foreign exchange contracts
 
$
71
 
$
71
 
$
176
 
$
176
 
Interest rate swap contracts
               
21
   
21
 
Liabilities
                         
Long-term debt
 
$
8,895
 
$
8,862
 
$
1,862
 
$
1,859
 
Foreign exchange contracts
   
27
   
27
   
55
   
55
 
Interest rate swap contracts
   
11
   
11
   
7
   
7
 

Considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop estimates of fair value. Estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that we could realize in a current market exchange due to changes in market rates since the reporting date.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

We develop, manufacture and sell medical devices globally and our earnings and cash flows are exposed to market risk from changes in currency exchange rates and interest rates. We address these risks through a risk management program that includes the use of derivative financial instruments. We operate the program pursuant to documented corporate risk management policies. We do not enter into derivative transactions for speculative purposes.

We estimate the fair value of derivative financial instruments based on the amount that we would receive or pay to terminate the agreements at the reporting date. We had currency derivative instruments outstanding in the contract amounts of $3.413 billion at December 31, 2006 and $3.593 billion at December 31, 2005. In addition, we had interest rate swap contracts outstanding in the notional amounts of $2.0 billion at December 31, 2006 and $1.1 billion at December 31, 2005. The increase in the notional amount of our interest rate swaps is due to entering into $2.0 billion of hedge contracts related to our $5.0 billion five-year term loan during 2006, offset by our termination of $1.1 billion in hedge contracts related to certain of our existing senior notes.

Currency Transaction Hedging

We manage our currency transaction exposures on a consolidated basis to take advantage of offsetting transactions. We use foreign currency denominated borrowings and currency forward contracts to manage the majority of the remaining transaction exposure. These currency forward contracts are not designated as cash flow, fair value or net investment hedges under Statement No. 133; are marked-to-market with changes in fair value recorded to earnings; and are entered into for periods consistent with currency transaction exposures, generally one to six months. These derivative instruments do not subject our earnings or cash flows to material risk since gains and losses on these derivatives generally offset losses and gains on the assets and liabilities being hedged. Changes in currency exchange rates related to any unhedged transactions may impact our earnings and cash flows.

Currency Translation Hedging

We use currency forward and option contracts to reduce the risk that our earnings and cash flows, associated with forecasted foreign currency denominated intercompany and third-party transactions, will be affected by currency exchange rate changes. Changes in currency exchange rates related to any unhedged transactions may impact our earnings and cash flows. The success of the hedging program depends, in part, on forecasts of transaction activity in various currencies (primarily Japanese yen, Euro, British pound sterling, Australian dollar and Canadian dollar). We may experience unanticipated currency exchange gains or losses to the extent that there are timing or permanent differences between forecasted and actual activity during periods of currency volatility. We record the effective portion of any change in the fair value of the derivative instruments, designated as cash flow hedges, in other comprehensive income until the related third-party transaction occurs. Once the related third-party transaction occurs, we reclassify the effective portion of any related gain or loss on the cash flow hedge from other comprehensive income to earnings. In the event the hedged forecasted transaction does not occur, or it becomes probable that it will not occur, we would reclassify the effective portion of any gain or loss on the
 
related cash flow hedge from other comprehensive income to earnings at that time. Gains and losses from hedge ineffectiveness were immaterial in 2006, 2005 and 2004. We recognized a net gain of $38 million during 2006, a net loss of $12 million during 2005, and a net loss of $51 million during 2004 on hedge contracts that matured in accordance with our currency translation risk management program. All cash flow hedges outstanding at December 31, 2006 mature within the subsequent 36-month period. As of December 31, 2006, $28 million of net unrealized gains are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, to recognize the effective portion of the fair value of any derivative instruments that are, or previously were, designated as foreign currency cash flow hedges as compared to $67 million of net unrealized gains at December 31, 2005. At December 31, 2006, there are $22 million of net gains, net of tax, which we may reclassify to earnings within the next twelve months to mitigate foreign exchange risk.

Interest Rate Hedging

We use interest rate derivative instruments to manage our exposure to interest rate movements and to reduce borrowing costs by converting floating-rate debt into fixed-rate debt or fixed-rate debt into floating-rate debt. We designate these derivative instruments as either fair value or cash flow hedges under Statement No. 133. We record changes in the fair value of fair value hedges in other income and expense, which is offset by changes in the fair value of the hedged debt obligation to the extent the hedge is effective. Interest expense includes interest payments made or received under interest rate derivative instruments. We record the effective portion of any change in the fair value of cash flow hedges as other comprehensive income, net of tax, and reclassify the gains or losses to interest expense during the hedged interest payment period.

Prior to 2006, we entered into fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps indexed to six-month LIBOR to hedge against potential changes in the fair value of certain of our senior notes. We designated these interest rate swaps as fair value hedges under Statement No. 133 with changes in fair value recorded to earnings offset by changes in the fair value of our hedged senior notes. We terminated these hedges during 2006 and realized a net loss of $14 million, which we recorded to the carrying amount of certain of our senior notes. As of December 31, 2006, the carrying amount of certain of our senior notes included $4 million of unamortized gains and $16 million of unamortized losses. As of December 31, 2005, the carrying amount of certain of our senior notes included $21 million of unrealized gains that we recorded as other long-term assets and $7 million of unrealized losses recorded as other long-term liabilities to recognize the fair value of the interest rate swaps.

During 2006 and 2005, we entered into floating-to-fixed treasury locks to hedge against potential changes in future cash flows of certain senior note issuances. The objective of these hedges was to protect against variability of interest payments on the forecasted senior notes issuance. We designated these agreements as cash flow hedges under Statement No. 133. Upon termination of the treasury locks, we realized net gains of $21 million during 2006. We recorded approximately $11 million, net of tax, as other comprehensive income during 2006, which we will amortize into earnings over the life of the hedged debt. During 2006, gains to earnings for ineffectiveness were immaterial. At December 31, 2006, we recorded $12 million of unamortized gain, net of tax, related to these treasury locks. Amounts recorded in 2005 associated with treasury locks were immaterial.

During the year ended December 31, 2006, we entered into floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps indexed to three-month LIBOR to hedge against variability in interest payments on $2.0 billion of our $5.0 billion five-year term loan. Three-month LIBOR approximated 5.36 percent at
 
December 31, 2006. We designated these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges under Statement No. 133 and, as such, we recorded the unrealized gains or losses as other comprehensive income, net of tax, until the hedged cash flow takes place. At December 31, 2006, we recorded a loss of $7 million, net of tax, in other comprehensive income to recognize the fair value of these swaps.

We recognized $2 million of net interest expense reductions related to interest rate derivative contracts in 2006 as compared to $9 million in 2005 and $16 million in 2004.
 
Note H—Leases

Rent expense amounted to $80 million in 2006, $63 million in 2005, and $50 million in 2004.

Future minimum rental commitments at December 31, 2006 under noncancelable operating lease agreements are as follows:

(in millions)
 
 
 
2007
 
$
61
 
2008
   
47
 
2009
   
24
 
2010
   
11
 
2011
   
5
 
Thereafter
   
36
 
   
$
184
 
 
In 2005, we entered a lease agreement with an entity affiliated with a co-chief executive officer of our Neuromodulation division to construct a new manufacturing facility for that business. We were reimbursed for the first $12 million in construction costs and are responsible for all additional costs to complete and prepare the facility for occupancy. We estimate costs to complete the project to be approximately $45 million. Future lease payments over the remaining 14-year lease term are approximately $35 million. In addition, we have the option to purchase the facility after the first lease year.

Our obligations under noncancelable capital leases were immaterial as of December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005.

Note I—Income Taxes
 
Income before income taxes consists of the following:

(in millions)
 
2006
 
2005
 
2004
 
Domestic
 
$
(4,535
)
$
(126
)
$
353
 
Foreign
   
1,000
   
1,017
   
1,141
 
   
$
(3,535
)
$
891
 
$
1,494
 
 
The related provision for income taxes consists of the following:
 

(in millions)
 
2006
 
2005
 
2004
 
Current
             
Federal
 
$
251
 
$
136
 
$
233
 
State
   
53
   
37
   
20
 
Foreign
   
158
   
86
   
149
 
   
$
462
 
$
259
 
$
402
 
Deferred
                   
Federal
 
$
(421
)
$
(25
)
$
73
 
State
   
(24
)
 
(1
)
 
4
 
Foreign
   
25
   
30
   
(47
)
     
(420
)
 
4
   
30
 
   
$
42
 
$
263
 
$
432
 
 
The reconciliation of income taxes at the federal statutory rate to the actual provision for income taxes is as follows:

 
2006
2005
2004
U.S. federal statutory income tax rate
(35.0%)
35.0%
35.0%
State income taxes, net of federal benefit
0.5%
3.0%
1.1%
Effect of foreign taxes
(6.1%)
(31.9%)
(12.4%)
Non-deductible acquisition expenses
40.8%
9.9%
1.5%
Research credit
(0.6%)
(1.6%)
(1.4%)
Valuation allowance
2.2%
(0.7%)
(0.6%)
Tax liability release on unremitted earnings
(3.8%)
   
Legal settlement
 
10.2%
1.8%
Extraordinary dividend from subsidiaries
 
(0.7%)
4.1%
Sale of intangible assets
3.3%
5.9%
 
Other, net
(0.1%)
0.4%
(0.2%)
 
1.2%
29.5%
28.9%
 
Significant components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31 are as follows:
 
 
 
 
 

(in millions)
 
2006
 
2005
 
Deferred tax assets
         
Inventory costs, intercompany profit and related reserves
 
$
241
 
$
142
 
Tax benefit of net operating loss, capital loss and tax credits
   
188
   
154
 
Reserves and accruals
   
291
   
125
 
Restructuring and acquisition-related charges, including purchased research and development
   
108
   
144
 
Litigation and product liability reserves
   
114
       
Investment write-down
   
78
       
Stock-based compensation expense
   
57
       
Other
   
5
   
53
 
     
1,082
   
618
 
Less: valuation allowance on deferred tax assets
   
97
   
17
 
   
$
985
 
$
601
 
Deferred tax liabilities
             
Property, plant and equipment
 
$
76
 
$
10
 
Intangible assets
   
3,053
   
453
 
Unremitted earnings of subsidiaries
         
133
 
Litigation settlement
   
24
   
24
 
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities
   
10
   
14
 
Unrealized gains on derivative financial instruments
   
19
   
39
 
Other
   
4
   
38
 
     
3,186
   
711
 
   
$
(2,201
)
$
(110
)
 
At December 31, 2006, we had U.S. tax net operating loss, capital loss and tax credit carryforwards, the tax effect of which was $88 million. In addition, we had foreign tax net operating loss and capital loss carryforwards, the tax effect of which was $100 million. These carryforwards will expire periodically beginning in 2007. We established a valuation allowance of $97 million against these carryforwards due to our determination, after consideration of all evidence, both positive and negative, that it is more likely than not that the carryforwards will not be realized. The increase in the valuation allowance from 2005 to 2006 is attributable primarily to foreign net operating losses generated during the year.
 
The income tax impact of the unrealized gain or loss component of other comprehensive income was a benefit of $27 million in 2006, a provision of $82 million in 2005 and a benefit of $30 million in 2004.
 
We do not provide income taxes on unremitted earnings of our foreign subsidiaries where we have indefinitely reinvested such earnings in our foreign operations. It is not practical to estimate the amount of income taxes payable on the earnings that are indefinitely reinvested in foreign operations. Unremitted earnings of our foreign subsidiaries that we have indefinitely reinvested offshore are $7.186 billion at December 31, 2006 and $2.106 billion at December 31, 2005.
 
As of December 31, 2005, we had recorded a $133 million deferred tax liability for unremitted earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries that we had anticipated repatriating in the foreseeable future. During 2006, we made a significant acquisition that, when combined with certain changes in business conditions subsequent to the acquisition, resulted in a reevaluation of this liability. We have determined that we will not repatriate these earnings in the foreseeable future and, instead, will indefinitely reinvest these earnings in foreign operations in order to repay debt obligations associated with the acquisition. As a result, we reversed the deferred tax liability and reduced income tax expense by $133 million in 2006.

During the first quarter of 2005, we repatriated $1.046 billion in extraordinary dividends, as defined in the American Jobs Creation Act, from our non-U.S. operations. The American Jobs Creation Act, enacted in October 2004, created a temporary incentive for U.S. corporations to repatriate accumulated income earned abroad by providing an 85 percent dividends-received deduction for certain dividends from controlled foreign operations. In 2005, we repatriated earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries for which we had previously accrued tax liabilities. The resulting tax liabilities associated with this repatriation were $127 million.

Note J—Commitments and Contingencies

The medical device market in which we primarily participate is in large part technology driven. Physician customers, particularly in interventional cardiology, move quickly to new products and new technologies. As a result, intellectual property rights, particularly patents and trade secrets, play a significant role in product development and differentiation. However, intellectual property litigation to defend or create market advantage is inherently complex and unpredictable. Furthermore, appellate courts frequently overturn lower court patent decisions.

In addition, competing parties frequently file multiple suits to leverage patent portfolios across product lines, technologies and geographies and to balance risk and exposure between the parties. In some cases, several competitors are parties in the same proceeding, or in a series of related proceedings, or litigate multiple features of a single class of devices. These forces frequently drive settlement not only of individual cases, but also of a series of pending and potentially related and unrelated cases. In addition, although monetary and injunctive relief is typically sought, remedies and restitution are generally not determined until the conclusion of the proceedings and are frequently modified on appeal. Accordingly, the outcomes of individual cases are difficult to time, predict or quantify and are often dependent upon the outcomes of other cases in other geographies.

Several third parties have asserted that our current and former stent systems infringe patents owned or licensed by them. We have similarly asserted that stent systems or other products sold by these companies infringe patents owned or licensed by us. Adverse outcomes in one or more of the proceedings against us could limit our ability to sell certain stent products in certain jurisdictions, or reduce our operating margin on the sale of these products.

We are substantially self-insured with respect to general, product liability and securities claims. In the normal course of business, product liability and securities claims are asserted against us. In connection with the acquisition of Guidant, the number of product liability claims and other legal proceedings filed against us, including private securities litigation and shareholder derivative suits, significantly increased. Product liability and securities claims against us may be asserted in the future related to events not known to management at the present time. The absence of significant third-party insurance coverage increases our potential exposure to unanticipated claims or adverse decisions. Product liability claims, product recalls,
 
securities litigation and other litigation in the future, regardless of their outcome, could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Our accrual for legal matters that are probable and estimable was $485 million at December 31, 2006 and $35 million at December 31, 2005. The amounts accrued at December 31, 2006 represent primarily accrued legal defense costs related to assumed Guidant litigation and product liability claims recorded as part of the purchase price. In connection with the acquisition of Guidant, we are still assessing certain assumed litigation and product liability claims to determine the amounts that management believes will be paid as a result of such claims and litigation and, therefore, additional losses may be accrued in the future. See Note A - Significant Accounting Policies for further discussion on our policy for accounting for legal, product liability and security claims.

In management’s opinion, we are not currently involved in any legal proceedings other than those specifically identified below, which, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material effect on our financial condition, operations and/or cash flows. Unless included in our accrual as of December 31, 2006 or otherwise indicated below, a range of loss associated with any individual material legal proceeding can not be estimated.  

In connection with Abbott’s acquisition of Guidant’s vascular intervention and endovascular solutions businesses, it assumed all liabilities of Guidant and its affiliates to the extent relating to these businesses and agreed to indemnify Guidant and its affiliates from any losses arising out of or relating to the businesses and the assumed liabilities. As a result, certain legal proceedings related to the businesses to which Guidant and/or its affiliates are a party have been assumed by and are the responsibility of Abbott. These proceedings are not expected to have a material impact on us and are not described herein.

Litigation with Johnson & Johnson

On October 22, 1997, Cordis Corporation, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, filed a suit for patent infringement against us and SCIMED Life Systems, Inc., our wholly owned subsidiary, alleging that the importation and use of the NIR® stent infringes two patents owned by Cordis. On April 13, 1998, Cordis filed a suit for patent infringement against us and SCIMED alleging that our NIR® stent infringes two additional patents owned by Cordis. The suits were filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware seeking monetary damages, injunctive relief and that the patents be adjudged valid, enforceable and infringed. A trial on both actions was held in late 2000. A jury found that the NIR® stent does not infringe three Cordis patents, but does infringe one claim of one Cordis patent and awarded damages of approximately $324 million to Cordis. On March 28, 2002, the Court set aside the damage award, but upheld the remainder of the verdict, and held that two of the four patents had been obtained through inequitable conduct in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. On May 27, 2005, Cordis filed an appeal on those two patents and an appeal hearing was held on May 3, 2006.  The Court of Appeals remanded the case back to the trial court for further briefing and fact-finding by the Court.  On May 16, 2002, the Court also set aside the verdict of infringement, requiring a new trial. On March 24, 2005, in a second trial, a jury found that a single claim of the Cordis patent was valid and infringed. The jury determined liability only; any monetary damages will be determined at a later trial. On March 27, 2006, the judge entered judgment in favor of Cordis, and on April 26, 2006, we filed an appeal. A hearing on the appeal has not yet been scheduled.  Even though it is reasonably possible that the we may incur a liability associated with this case, we do not believe that a loss is probable or estimable. Therefore, we have not accrued for any losses associated with this case.

 
On April 2, 1997, Ethicon and other Johnson & Johnson subsidiaries filed a cross-border proceeding in The Netherlands alleging that the NIR® stent infringes a European patent licensed to Ethicon. In this action, the Johnson & Johnson entities requested relief, including provisional relief (a preliminary injunction). In October 1997, Johnson & Johnson’s request for provisional cross-border relief on the patent was denied by the Dutch Court, on the ground that it is “very likely” that the NIR® stent will be found not to infringe the patent. Johnson & Johnson’s appeal of this decision was denied. In January 1999, Johnson & Johnson amended the claims of the patent and changed the action from a cross-border case to a Dutch national action. On June 23, 1999, the Dutch Court affirmed that there were no remaining infringement claims with respect to the patent and also asked the Dutch Patent Office for technical advice about the validity of the amended patent. In late 1999, Johnson & Johnson appealed this decision. On March 11, 2004, the Court of Appeals nullified the Dutch Court’s June 23, 1999 decision and the proceedings have been returned to the Dutch Court. In accordance with its 1999 decision, the Dutch Court asked the Dutch Patent Office for technical advice on the validity of the amended patent. On August 31, 2005, the Dutch Patent Office issued its technical advice that the amended patent was valid but left certain legal issues for the Dutch Court to resolve. At this time, no further proceedings have occurred in the Dutch Court.

On August 22, 1997, Johnson & Johnson filed a suit for patent infringement against Boston Scientific alleging that the sale of the NIR® stent infringes certain Canadian patents owned by Johnson & Johnson. Suit was filed in the federal court of Canada seeking a declaration of infringement, monetary damages and injunctive relief. On December 2, 2004, the Court dismissed the case, finding all patents to be invalid. On December 6, 2004, Johnson & Johnson appealed the Court’s decision, and in May 2006, the Court reinstated the patent. In August 2006, we appealed the Court’s decision to the Supreme Court. On January 18, 2007, the Supreme Court denied review. A trial has not yet been scheduled.

On February 14, 2002, we, and certain of our subsidiaries, filed suit for patent infringement against Johnson & Johnson and Cordis alleging that certain balloon catheters and stent delivery systems sold by Johnson & Johnson and Cordis infringe five U.S. patents owned by Boston Scientific. The complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California seeking monetary and injunctive relief. On October 15, 2002, Cordis filed a counterclaim alleging that certain balloon catheters and stent delivery systems sold by Boston Scientific infringe three U.S. patents owned by Cordis and seeking monetary and injunctive relief. On December 6, 2002, we filed an amended complaint alleging that two additional patents owned by us are infringed by the Cordis products. A bench trial on interfering patent issues was held December 5, 2005 and on September 19, 2006, the Court found there to be no interference. Trial is scheduled to begin on October 9, 2007.

On March 26, 2002, we and Target Therapeutics, Inc., our wholly owned subsidiary, filed suit for patent infringement against Cordis alleging that certain detachable coil delivery systems and /or pushable coil vascular occlusion systems (coil delivery systems) infringe three U.S. patents, owned by or exclusively licensed to Target. The complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California seeking monetary and injunctive relief. In 2004, the Court granted summary judgement in our favor finding infringement of one of the patents.  On November 14, 2005, the Court denied Cordis’ summary judgment motions with respect to the validity of the
 
patent. Cordis filed a motion for reconsideration and a hearing was held on October 26, 2006. The Court ruled on Cordis’ motion for reconsideration by modifying its claim construction order. On February 9, 2007, Cordis filed a motion for summary judgment of non-infringement with respect to one of the patents and a hearing on Cordis’ motion is scheduled for March 22, 2007. A trial has not yet been scheduled.

On January 13, 2003, Cordis filed suit for patent infringement against Boston Scientific and SCIMED alleging that our Express 2 ™ coronary stent infringes a U.S. patent owned by Cordis. The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware seeking monetary and injunctive relief. We answered the complaint, denying the allegations and filed a counterclaim alleging that certain Cordis products infringe a patent owned by us. On August 4, 2004, the Court granted a Cordis motion to add our Liberté™ coronary stent and two additional patents to the complaint. On June 21, 2005, a jury found that our TAXUS® Express 2 ™, Express 2 , Express™ Biliary, and Liberté stents infringe a Johnson & Johnson patent and that the Liberté stent infringes a second Johnson & Johnson patent. The juries only determined liability; monetary damages will be determined at a later trial. We filed a motion to set aside the verdict and enter judgment in its favor as a matter of law. On May 11, 2006, our motion was denied. With respect to our counterclaim, a jury found on July 1, 2005, that Johnson & Johnson’s Cypher®, Bx Velocity®, Bx Sonic™ and Genesis™ stents infringe our patent. Johnson & Johnson filed a motion to set aside the verdict and enter judgment in its favor as a matter of law. On May 11, 2006, the Court denied Johnson & Johnson’s motion. Johnson & Johnson has moved for reconsideration of the Court’s decision. Even though it is reasonably possible that we will incur a liability associated with this case, we do not believe that a loss is probable or estimable. Therefore, we have not accrued for any losses associated with this case.

On March 13, 2003, we, and Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc., filed suit for patent infringement against Johnson & Johnson and Cordis, alleging that its Cypher drug-eluting stent infringes one of our patents. The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware seeking monetary and injunctive relief. Cordis answered the complaint, denying the allegations, and filed a counterclaim against us alleging that the patent is not valid and is unenforceable. We subsequently filed amended and new complaints in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware alleging that the Cypher drug-eluting stent infringes four of our additional patents (“Additional Patents”). Following the announcement on February 23, 2004 by Guidant Corporation of an agreement with Johnson & Johnson and Cordis to sell the Cypher drug-eluting stent, we amended our complaint to include Guidant and certain of its subsidiaries as co-defendants as to certain patents in suit.  We may replace Abbott for Guidant as a party in the suit as a result of Abbott’s purchase of Guidant’s vascular interventions and endovascular solutions businesses.  In March 2005, we filed a stipulated dismissal as to three of the four Additional Patents. On July 1, 2005, a jury found that Johnson & Johnson’s Cypher drug-eluting stent infringes one of our patents and upheld the validity of the patent. The jury determined liability only; any monetary damages will be determined at a later trial. Johnson & Johnson filed a motion to set aside the verdict and enter judgment in its favor as a matter of law. On June 15, 2006, the Court denied Johnson & Johnson’s motion. Johnson & Johnson has moved for reconsideration of the Court’s decision. A summary judgment hearing as to the remaining patent was held on June 14, 2006. A trial regarding infringement and validity of the remaining patent has not yet been scheduled.
 
On December 24, 2003, we (through our subsidiary Schneider Europe GmbH) filed suit against the Belgian subsidiaries of Johnson & Johnson, Cordis and Janssen Pharmaceutica alleging that Cordis’ Bx Velocity stent, Bx Sonic® stent, Cypher stent, Cypher Select stent, Aqua T3™ balloon and U-Pass balloon infringe one of our European patents. The suit was filed in the
 
District Court of Brussels, Belgium seeking preliminary cross-border, injunctive and monetary relief and sought an expedited review of the claims by the Court. A separate suit was filed in the District Court of Brussels, Belgium against nine additional Johnson & Johnson subsidiaries. The Belgium Court linked all Johnson & Johnson entities into a single action but dismissed the case for failure to satisfy the requirements for expedited review without commenting on the merits of the claims. On August 5, 2004, we refiled the suit on the merits against the same Johnson & Johnson subsidiaries in the District Court of Brussels, Belgium seeking cross-border, injunctive and monetary relief for infringement of the same European patent. A hearing has not yet been scheduled. In December 2005, the Johnson & Johnson subsidiaries filed a nullity action in France and, in January 2006, the same Johnson & Johnson subsidiaries filed nullity actions in Italy and Germany. We have filed a counterclaim infringement action in Italy.

On May 12, 2004, we filed suit against two of Johnson & Johnson’s Dutch subsidiaries, alleging that Cordis’ Bx Velocity stent, Bx Sonic stent, Cypher stent, Cypher Select stent, and Aqua T3 balloon delivery systems for those stents, and U-Pass angioplasty balloon catheters infringe one of our European patents. The suit was filed in the District Court of The Hague in The Netherlands seeking injunctive and monetary relief. On June 8, 2005, the Court found the Johnson & Johnson products infringe our patent and granted injunctive relief. On June 23, 2005, the District Court in Assen. The Netherlands stayed enforcement of the injunction. On October 12, 2005, a Dutch Court of Appeals overturned the Assen court’s ruling and reinstated the injunction against the manufacture, use and sale of the Cordis products in The Netherlands. Damages for Cordis’ infringing acts in The Netherlands will be determined at a later date. Cordis’ appeal of the validity and infringement ruling by The Hague Court remains pending. A hearing on this appeal was held on November 2, 2006 and a decision is expected on March 15, 2007.
 
On September 27, 2004, our wholly owned subsidiary, Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc., filed suit against a German subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson alleging the Cypher drug-eluting stent infringes one of our European patents. The suit was filed in Mannheim, Germany seeking monetary and injunctive relief. A hearing was held on April 1, 2005 and on July 15, 2005, the Court indicated that it would appoint a technical expert. The expert’s opinion was submitted to the Court on September 19, 2006. A final hearing has not yet been scheduled.

On October 15, 2004, our wholly owned subsidiary, Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc., filed suit against a German subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson alleging the Cypher drug-eluting stent infringes one of our German utility models. The suit was filed in Mannheim, Germany seeking monetary and injunctive relief. A hearing was held on April 1, 2005 and on July 15, 2005, the Court indicated that it would appoint a technical expert. The expert’s opinion was submitted to the Court on September 19, 2006. A final hearing has not yet been scheduled.

On December 30, 2004, our wholly owned subsidiary, Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc., filed suit against a German subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson alleging the Cypher drug-eluting stent infringes one of our German utility models. The suit was filed in Dusseldorf, Germany seeking monetary and injunctive relief. A hearing was held on December 1, 2005. In January 2006, the judge rendered a decision of non-infringement. On January 29, 2006, Scimed appealed the judge’s decision. On February 15, 2007, the Court decided to appoint a technical expert. A hearing date has not yet been scheduled.

On September 25, 2006, Johnson & Johnson filed a lawsuit against us, Guidant and Abbott in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleges that Guidant breached certain provisions of the amended merger agreement between Johnson & Johnson and Guidant (Merger Agreement) as well as the implied duty of good faith and fair
 
dealing. The complaint further alleges that we and Abbott tortiously interfered with the Merger Agreement by inducing Guidant’s breach. The complaint seeks certain factual findings, damages in an amount no less than $5.5 billion and attorneys’ fees and costs. We and Guidant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on November 15, 2006. Johnson & Johnson filed its opposition to the motion on January 9, 2007, and defendants filed their reply on January 31, 2007. A hearing on the motion to dismiss was held on February 28, 2007. The judge took the matter under advisement, and stayed discovery pending his decision on the motion.

On February 1, 2005, we and Angiotech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. filed suit against Conor Medsystems, Inc., a subsidiary of Johnson and Johnson, in The Hague, The Netherlands seeking a declaration that Conor’s drug-eluting stent products infringe patents owned by Angiotech and licensed to us. A hearing was held on October 27, 2006, and a decision was rendered on January 17, 2007 in favor of Angiotech and us.

On May 4, 2006, we filed suit against Conor Medsystems Ireland Ltd. alleging that its Costar ® paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent system infringes our balloon catheter patent. The suit was filed in Ireland seeking monetary and injunctive relief.  On May 24, 2006, Conor responded, denying the allegations and filed a counterclaim against us alleging that the patent is not valid and is unenforceable.

On November 8, 2005, we and Scimed filed suit against Conor alleging that certain of Conor’s stent and drug-coated stent products infringe a patent owned by us. The complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware seeking monetary and injunctive relief. On December 30, 2005, Conor answered the complaint, denying the allegations. Trial is expected to begin on October 15, 2007.

Litigation with Medtronic, Inc.
 
On March 1, 2006, Medtronic Vascular filed suit against us and SCIMED alleging that our balloon products infringe four U.S. patents owned by Medtronic Vascular. The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas seeking monetary and injunctive relief.
 
 
 
On April 25, 2006, we answered and filed a counterclaim seeking a declaratory judgment of invalidity and non-infringement. Trial is scheduled to begin on May 5, 2008.

Litigation Relating to St. Jude Medical, Inc.  
 
On February 2, 2004, Guidant, Guidant Sales Corp. (GSC), Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. (CPI) and Mirowski Family Ventures LLC filed a declaratory judgment action in the District Court for Delaware against St. Jude Medical and Pacesetter Inc., a subsidiary of St. Jude Medical, alleging that their Epic HF, Atlas HF and Frontier 3x2 devices infringe a patent exclusively licensed to Guidant. Pursuant to a Settlement Agreement dated July 29, 2006 between us and St. Jude Medical, the parties have agreed to limit the scope and available remedies of this case. Trial is scheduled to begin on August 20, 2007.

GSC, CPI and Mirowski are plaintiffs in a patent infringement suit originally filed against St. Jude Medical and its affiliates in November 1996 in the District Court in Indianapolis. In July 2001, a jury found that a patent licensed to CPI and expired in December 2003, was valid but not infringed by certain of St. Jude Medical’s defibrillator products. In February 2002, the District Court reversed the jury’s finding of validity. In August 2004, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, among other things, reinstated the jury verdict of validity and remanded the matter for a new trial on infringement and damages. The case was sent back to the District Court for further proceedings. Pursuant to a Settlement Agreement dated July 29, 2006 between us and St. Jude Medical, the parties agreed to limit the scope and available remedies of this case. Trial is scheduled to begin on April 30, 2007.
 
Litigation with Medinol Ltd.
 
On February 20, 2006, Medinol submitted a request for arbitration against us, and our wholly owned subsidiaries Boston Scientific Ltd. and Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc., under the Arbitration Rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization pursuant to a settlement agreement between Medinol and us dated September 21, 2005. The request for arbitration alleges that the Company’s Liberté coronary stent system infringes two U.S. patents and one European patent owned by Medinol. Medinol is seeking to have the patents declared valid and enforceable and a reasonable royalty. The September 2005 settlement agreement provides, among other things, that Medinol may only seek reasonable royalties and is specifically precluded from seeking injunctive relief. As a result, we do not expect the outcome of this proceeding to have a material impact on the continued sale of the Liberté™ stent system internationally or in the United States, the continued sale of the TAXUS® Liberté™ stent system internationally or the launch of the TAXUS® Liberté™ stent system in the United States. We plan to defend against Medinol’s claims vigorously. The arbitration hearing is scheduled to begin on September 17, 2007.
 
On September 25, 2002, we filed suit against Medinol alleging Medinol’s NIRFlex™ and NIRFlex™ Royal products infringe a patent owned by us. The suit was filed in the District Court of The Hague, The Netherlands seeking cross-border, monetary and injunctive relief. On September 10, 2003, the Dutch Court ruled that the patent was invalid. We appealed the Court’s decision in December 2003. A hearing on the appeal was held on August 17, 2006. On December 14, 2006, a decision was rendered upholding the trial court ruling.
 
On February 26, 2007, Medinol filed a Vindication Action against us in the German District Court of Munich, Germany. The complaint alleges, and seeks a ruling, that Medinol be deemed the owner of one of our patents covering coronary stent designs. We are in the process of evaluating this matter.
Other Patent Litigation
 
On September 12, 2002, ev3 Inc. filed suit against The Regents of the University of California and a subsidiary of ours in the District Court of The Hague, The Netherlands, seeking a declaration that ev3’s EDC II and VDS embolic coil products do not infringe three patents licensed to us from The Regents. On October 22, 2003, the Court ruled that the ev3 products infringe three patents licensed to us. On December 18, 2003, ev3 appealed the Court’s ruling. A hearing on the appeal has not yet been scheduled. A damages hearing is scheduled for June 15, 2007.

On March 29, 2005, we and our wholly owned subsidiary, Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc., filed suit against ev3 for patent infringement, alleging that ev3’s SpideRX™ embolic protection device infringes four U.S. patents owned by us. The complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota seeking monetary and injunctive relief. On May 9, 2005, ev3 answered the complaint, denying the allegations, and filed a counterclaim seeking a declaratory judgment of invalidity and unenforceability, and noninfringement of our patents in the suit. On October 28, 2005, ev3 filed its first amended answer and counterclaim alleging that certain of our embolic protection devices infringe a patent owned by ev3. On June 20, 2006, we filed an amended complaint adding a claim of trade secret misappropriation and claiming infringement of two additional U.S. patents owned by us. On June 30, 2006, ev3 filed an amended answer and counterclaim alleging infringement of two additional U.S. patents owned by ev3. A trial has not yet been scheduled.

On December 16, 2003, The Regents of the University of California filed suit against Micro Therapeutics, Inc., a subsidiary of ev3, and Dendron GmbH alleging that Micro Therapeutics’ Sapphire™ detachable coil delivery systems infringe twelve patents licensed to us and owned by The Regents. The complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California seeking monetary and injunctive relief. On January 8, 2004, Micro Therapeutics and Dendron filed a third-party complaint to include us and Target as third-party defendants seeking a declaratory judgment of invalidity and noninfringement with respect to the patents and antitrust violations. On February 17, 2004, we, as a third-party defendant, filed a motion to dismiss us from the case. On July 9, 2004, the Court granted our motion in part and dismissed us and Target from the claims relating only to patent infringement, while denying dismissal of an antitrust claim. On April 7, 2006, the Court denied Micro Therapeutics’ motion seeking unenforceability of The Regents’ patent and denied The Regents’ cross-motion for summary judgment of unenforceability. A trial has been scheduled for June 5, 2007.
 
On September 27, 2004, we and a subsidiary filed suit for patent infringement against Micrus Corporation alleging that certain detachable embolic coil devices infringe two U.S. patents exclusively licensed to the subsidiary. The complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California seeking monetary and injunctive relief. On November 16, 2004, Micrus answered and filed counterclaims seeking a declaration of invalidity, unenforceability and noninfringement and included allegations of infringement against us relating to three U.S. patents owned by Micrus, and antitrust violations. On January 10, 2005, we filed a motion to dismiss certain of Micrus’ counterclaims, and on February 23, 2005, the Court granted a request to stay the proceedings pending a reexamination of our patents by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. On February 23, 2006, the stay was lifted. Subsequently, Micrus provided a covenant not to sue us with respect to one of the Micrus patents. A trial date has not yet been set.
 
On November 26, 2005, we and Angiotech filed suit against Occam International, BV in The Hague, The Netherlands seeking a preliminary injunction against Occam’s drug-eluting stent
 
products based on infringement of patents owned by Angiotech and licensed to us. A hearing was held January 13, 2006, and on January 27, 2006, the Court denied our request for a preliminary injunction. We and Angiotech have appealed the Court’s decision, and the parties plan to pursue normal infringement proceedings against Occam in The Netherlands. 

On April 4, 2005, we and Angiotech filed suit against Sahajanand Medical Technologies Pvt. Ltd. in The Hague, The Netherlands seeking a declaration that Sahajanand’s drug-eluting stent products infringe patents owned by Angiotech and licensed to us. On May 3, 2006, the Court found that the asserted claims were infringed and valid, and provided for injunctive and monetary relief. On July 13, 2006, Sahajanand appealed the Court’s decision. A hearing on the appeal has not been scheduled.
 
On May 19, 2005, G. David Jang, M.D. filed suit against us alleging breach of contract relating to certain patent rights assigned to our covering stent technology. The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court, Central District of California seeking monetary damages and rescission of the contract. On June 24, 2005, we answered, denying the allegations, and filed a counterclaim. After a Markman ruling relating to the Jang patent rights, Dr. Jang stipulated to the dismissal of certain claims alleged in the complaint with a right to appeal. In February 2007, the parties agreed to settle the other claims of the case.

On December 16, 2005, Bruce N. Saffran, M.D., Ph.D. filed suit against us alleging that our TAXUS® Express coronary stent system infringes a patent owned by Dr. Saffran. The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas and seeks monetary and injunctive relief. On February 8, 2006, we filed an answer, denying the allegations of the complaint. Trial is expected to begin on January 3, 2008.

Other Proceedings
 
On January 10, 2002 and January 15, 2002, Alan Schuster and Antoinette Loeffler, respectively, putatively initiated shareholder derivative lawsuits for and on our behalf in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against the Company’s then current directors and us as nominal defendant. Both complaints allege, among other things, that with regard to our relationship with Medinol, the defendants breached their fiduciary duties to us and our shareholders in our management and affairs, and in the use and preservation of our assets. The suits seek a declaration of the directors’ alleged breach, damages sustained by us as a result of the alleged breach and monetary and injunctive relief. On October 18, 2002, the plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint naming two senior officials as defendants and us as nominal defendant. The action was stayed in February 2003 pending resolution of a separate lawsuit brought by Medinol against us. After the resolution of the Medinol lawsuit, plaintiffs, on May 1, 2006, were permitted to file an amended complaint to supplement the allegations in the prior consolidated amended complaint based mainly on events that occurred subsequent to the parties’ agreement to stay the action. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on or about June 30, 2006. The motion was denied without prejudice at a hearing on October 20, 2006, and the Court ordered that the amended complaint be deemed a demand for our Board of Directors to consider taking action in connection with the allegations of the amended complaint. The Court stayed the litigation until March 9, 2007.
 
On September 8, 2005, the Laborers Local 100 and 397 Pension Fund initiated a putative shareholder derivative lawsuit for and on behalf of Boston Scientific in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Superior Court Department for Middlesex County against our directors, certain of our current and former officers and Boston Scientific as nominal defendant. The complaint alleged, among other things, that with regard to certain matters of regulatory compliance, the defendants breached their fiduciary duties to Boston Scientific and its shareholders in the management and affairs of our business and in the use and preservation of our assets. The complaint also alleged that as a result of the alleged misconduct and the purported failure to publicly disclose material information, certain directors and officers sold our stock at inflated prices in violation of their fiduciary duties and were unjustly enriched. The suits sought a declaration of the directors’ and officers’ alleged breaches, unspecified damages sustained by us as a result of the alleged breaches and other unspecified equitable and injunctive relief. On September 15, 2005, Benjamin Roussey also initiated a putative shareholder derivative lawsuit in the same Court alleging similar misconduct and seeking similar relief. Following consolidation of the cases, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated derivative complaint. Our motion to dismiss was granted without leave to amend on September 11, 2006. On September 21, 2006, plaintiff Laborers Local 100 and 397 Pension Fund filed a motion to alter or amend judgment and for leave to file an amended complaint which was denied on October 19, 2006. On February 17, 2007, the Board of Directors received two letters from the Laborers Local 100 and 397 Pension Fund demanding that the Board of Directors investigate and commence action against the defendants named in the original complaint in connection with the matters alleged in the original complaint. The second letter made a demand for an inspection of certain books and records for the purpose of, among other things, the investigation of possible breaches of fiduciary duty, misappropriation of information, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, waste of corporate assets and unjust enrichment. The Board of Directors and the Company are considering what actions should be taken in response to the letters.
 
On September 23, 2005, Srinivasan Shankar, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, filed a purported securities class action suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts on behalf of those who purchased or otherwise acquired our securities during the period March 31, 2003 through August 23, 2005, alleging that we and certain of our officers
 
violated certain sections of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. On September 28, 2005, October 27, 2005, November 2, 2005 and November 3, 2005, Jack Yopp, Robert L. Garber, Betty C. Meyer and John Ryan, respectively, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, filed additional purported securities class action suits in the same Court on behalf of the same purported class. On February 15, 2006, the Court ordered that the five class actions be consolidated and appointed the Mississippi Public Employee Retirement System Group as lead plaintiff. A consolidated amended complaint was filed on April 17, 2006. The consolidated amended complaint alleges that we made material misstatements and omissions by failing to disclose the supposed merit of the Medinol litigation and DOJ investigation relating to the 1998 NIR ON® Ranger with Sox stent recall, problems with the TAXUS® drug-eluting coronary stent systems that led to product recalls, and our ability to satisfy FDA regulations concerning medical device quality. The consolidated amended complaint seeks unspecified damages, interest, and attorneys’ fees. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint on June 8, 2006. A hearing on the motion was held on January 30, 2007.

On January 19, 2006, George Larson, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, filed a purported class action complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts on behalf of participants and beneficiaries of our 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan (401(k) Plan) and GESOP (together the Plans) alleging that we and certain of our officers and employees violated certain provisions under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA) and Department of Labor Regulations. On January 26, 2006, February 8, 2006, February 14, 2006, February 23, 2006 and March 3, 2006, Robert Hochstadt, Jeff Klunke, Kirk Harvey, Michael Lowe and Douglas Fletcher, respectively, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, filed purported class action complaints in the same Court on behalf of the participants and beneficiaries in our Plans alleging similar misconduct and seeking similar relief as in the Larson lawsuit. On April 3, 2006, the Court issued an order consolidating the actions and appointing Jeffrey Klunke and Michael Lowe as interim lead plaintiffs. On August 23, 2006, plaintiffs filed a consolidated complaint that purports to bring a class action on behalf of all participants and beneficiaries of our 401(k) Plan during the period May 7, 2004 through January 26, 2006 alleging that we, our 401(k) Administrative and Investment Committee (the Committee), members of the Committee, and certain directors violated certain provisions of ERISA. The complaint alleges, among other things, that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the 401(k) Plan’s participants. The complaint seeks equitable and monetary relief. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss on October 10, 2006. Plaintiffs filed their opposition memorandum on December 15, 2006, and defendants filed their reply on January 16, 2007. A hearing has not yet been scheduled.

On January 26, 2006, Donald Wright filed a purported class action complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota against us and Guidant on behalf of himself and all other senior citizens and handicapped persons similarly situated seeking a permanent injunction to prohibit us from completing its acquisition of Guidant, alleging violations of the Minnesota Fraudulent Transfers Act and Consumer Fraud Act. The complaint seeks restitution on behalf of those persons who suffered injury related to Guidant’s cardiac pacemakers and/or defibrillators. The complaint also seeks monetary damages and injunctive relief. Mr. Wright filed an amended complaint on February 21, 2006, dropping his claim for monetary damages.
 
We are a defendant in two lawsuits involving the TAXUS Express 2 paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent system in which the plaintiffs are seeking class certification. On November 16, 2006, Michael Seaburn and Beatriz Seaburn filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida on behalf of themselves and a purported class of plaintiffs resident in the United States. On January 23, 2007, Ronald E. and Tammy Coterill filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho on behalf of themselves and a purported class of plaintiffs resident in the state of Idaho or any contiguous state. Both complaints seek certification of class status and also seek compensatory damages for personal injury, restitution of the purchase price, disgorgement of our profits associated with the sale of TAXUS stent systems, and, in the Idaho case, injunctive relief in the form of medical monitoring. We have answered both complaints and intend to vigorously defend against each of their allegations.

On June 12, 2003, Guidant announced that its subsidiary, EndoVascular Technologies, Inc. (EVT), had entered into a plea agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice relating to a previously disclosed investigation regarding the ANCURE ENDOGRAFT System for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. At the time of the EVT plea, Guidant had outstanding fourteen suits alleging product liability related causes of action relating to the ANCURE System.
 
Subsequent to the EVT plea, Guidant was notified of additional claims and served with additional complaints. From time to time, Guidant has settled certain of the individual claims and suits for amounts that were not material to Guidant. Currently, Guidant has approximately 18 suits outstanding, and more suits may be filed. Additionally, Guidant has been notified of over 150 unfiled claims that are pending. The cases generally allege the plaintiffs suffered injuries, and in certain cases died, as a result of purported defects in the device or the accompanying warnings and labeling. The complaints seek damages, including punitive damages.

While insurance may reduce Guidant’s exposure with respect to ANCURE claims, one of Guidant’s carriers, Allianz Insurance Company (Allianz), filed suit in the Circuit Court, State of Illinois, County of DuPage, seeking to rescind or otherwise deny coverage and alleging fraud. Additional carriers have intervened in the case and Guidant affiliates, including EVT, are also named as defendants. Guidant and its affiliates also have initiated suit against certain of its carriers, including Allianz, in the Superior Court, State of Indiana, County of Marion, in order to preserve Guidant’s rights to coverage. The lawsuits are virtually identical and proceeding in both state courts. A trial has not yet been scheduled in the Illinois case. A trial is expected to begin in late 2007 or early 2008 in the Indiana case.

Shareholder derivative suits relating to the ANCURE System are currently pending in the Southern District of Indiana and in the Superior Court of the State of Indiana, County of Marion. The suits, purportedly filed on behalf of Guidant, initially alleged that Guidant’s directors breached their fiduciary duties by taking improper steps or failing to take steps to prevent the ANCURE and EVT related matters described above. The complaints seek damages and other equitable relief. The state court derivative suits have been stayed in favor of the federal derivative action. Guidant moved to dismiss the federal derivative action. The plaintiff in the federal derivative case filed an amended complaint in December 2005, adding allegations regarding defibrillator and pacemaker products and Guidant’s proposed merger with Johnson & Johnson. On January 23, 2006, Guidant and its directors moved to dismiss the amended complaint. On March 1, 2006, a second amended complaint in the federal derivative case was filed. On May 1, 2006, the defendants moved to dismiss the second amended complaint. This motion remains pending.

In July 2005, a purported class action complaint was filed on behalf of participants in Guidant’s employee pension benefit plans. This action was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana against Guidant and its directors. The complaint alleges breaches of fiduciary duty under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1132.  Specifically, the complaint alleges that Guidant fiduciaries concealed adverse information about Guidant’s defibrillators and imprudently made contributions to Guidant’s 401(k) plan and employee stock ownership plan in the form of Guidant stock. The complaint seeks class certification, declaratory and injunctive relief, monetary damages, the imposition of a constructive trust, and costs and attorneys’ fees. A second, similar complaint was filed and consolidated with the initial complaint. A consolidated, amended complaint was filed on February 8, 2006. The defendants moved to dismiss the consolidated complaint, and on September 15, 2006, the Court dismissed the complaint for lack of jurisdiction. In October 2006, the Plaintiffs appealed the Court’s decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. This appeal remains pending.
 
Approximately 75 product liability class action lawsuits and more than 1,100 individual lawsuits are pending in various state and federal jurisdictions against Guidant alleging personal injuries associated with defibrillators or pacemakers involved in the 2005 and 2006 product communications. The majority of the cases in the United States are pending in federal court but
 
approximately 83 cases are currently pending in state courts. On November 7, 2005, the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation established MDL-1708 (MDL) in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota and appointed a single judge to preside over all the cases in the MDL. The MDL Court scheduled the first federal court trial for July 16, 2007. An additional nine lawsuits are pending in Canada. Of these nine suits in Canada, six are putative class actions and three are individual lawsuits. On June 13, 2006, the Minnesota Supreme Court appointed a single judge to preside over all Minnesota state court lawsuits involving cases arising from the recent product communications. The first state court trial has been scheduled in Minnesota for January 28, 2008.

In April 2006, the personal injury plaintiffs and certain third-party payors served a Master Complaint in the MDL asserting claims for class action certification, alleging claims of strict liability, negligence, fraud, breach of warranty and other common law and/or statutory claims and seeking punitive damages. The majority of claimants allege no physical injury, but are suing for medical monitoring and anxiety. Pursuant to an agreement between the parties, the cases originally scheduled to be tried in Texas state court in September 2006 are no longer set for trial.  Earlier this year, the FDA’s Office of Criminal Investigations has issued a subpoena to the plaintiffs’ attorneys involved in this trial asking plaintiffs’ counsel to turn over documents they have received from Guidant as part of the civil litigation discovery process. To date, Guidant has also been informed of over 4,500 claims of individuals that may or may not mature into filed suits.

Guidant has received requests for information in the form of Civil Investigative Demands (CID) from the attorneys general of Arizona, California, Oregon, Illinois, Vermont and Louisiana. These attorneys general advise that approximately thirty other states and the District of Columbia are cooperating in these CID demands. The CIDs pertain to whether Guidant violated any applicable state laws, primarily state consumer protection laws, in connection with the sale and promotion of certain of its implantable defibrillators. Guidant is cooperating with these investigations.

On November 2, 2005, the Attorney General of the State of New York filed a civil complaint against Guidant pursuant to the New York’s Consumer Protection Law (N.Y. Executive Law § 63(12)). In the complaint, the Attorney General alleges that Guidant concealed from physicians and patients a design flaw in its PRIZM 1861 defibrillator from approximately February of 2002 until May 23, 2005. The complaint further alleges that due to Guidant’s concealment of this information, Guidant has engaged in repeated and persistent fraudulent conduct in violation of N.Y. Executive Law § 63(12). The Attorney General is seeking permanent injunctive relief, restitution for patients in whom a PRIZM 1861 defibrillator manufactured before April 2002 was implanted, disgorgement of profits, and all other proper relief. This case is currently pending in the MDL in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.
 
Approximately seventy former employees have filed charges against Guidant with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Most of the charges were filed in the Minneapolis Area Office. The charges allege that Guidant discriminated against the former employees on the basis of their age when Guidant terminated their employment in August 2004 in conjunction with Guidant’s reduction in force. In September 2006, the EEOC found probable cause to support the allegations in the charges pending before it. Separately, in April 2006, approximately sixty of these former employees also sued Guidant in federal district court for the District of Minnesota, alleging that Guidant discriminated against the former employees on the basis of their age when Guidant terminated their employment in August 2004 in conjunction with a reduction in force. The parties each filed summary judgment motions. All but one of the
 
plaintiffs in the federal court action signed a full and complete release of claims that included any claim based on age discrimination, shortly after their employments ended in 2004. The parties conducted discovery in the fall of 2006 regarding the issue of the validity of those releases and have since filed cross motions for summary judgment on this issue. A hearing on the summary judgment motions was held on February 21, 2007, and a decision has not yet been rendered.
 
Guidant is a defendant in two separate complaints in which plaintiffs allege a right of recovery under the Medicare secondary payer (or MSP) private right of action, as well as related claims. Plaintiffs claim as damages double the amount paid by Medicare in connection with devices that were the subject of recent voluntary field actions. Both of these cases are now pending in the MDL in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. We have moved to dismiss one of the suits and the plaintiff filed an opposition to this motion. A hearing on the motion is expected to be scheduled early in the second quarter of 2007. The Court has stayed the response time for the other action.
 
Guidant or its affiliates are defendants in four separate actions brought by private third-party providers of health benefits or health insurance (TPPs). In these cases, plaintiffs allege various theories of recovery, including derivative tort claims, subrogation, violation of consumer protection statutes and unjust enrichment, for the cost of healthcare benefits they allegedly paid for in connection with the devices that have been the subject of Guidant’s voluntary field actions.

Two of these actions are pending in the multi-district litigation in the federal district court in Minnesota (MDL) as part of a single ‘master complaint,’ filed on April 24, 2006, which also includes other types of claims by other plaintiffs. The two named TPP plaintiffs in the master complaint claim to represent a putative nationwide class of TPPs.  These two TPP plaintiffs had previously filed separate complaints against Guidant. Guidant has moved to dismiss the MDL TPP claims in the master complaint for failure to state a claim. A hearing on the motion is expected to be scheduled before the end of the second quarter of 2007.

The other two TPP actions are pending in state court in Minnesota, and are part of the coordinated state court proceeding ordered by the Minnesota Supreme Court. The plaintiffs in one of these cases are a number of Blue Cross & Blue Shield plans, while the plaintiffs in the other case are a national health insurer and its affiliates. The complaints in these cases were served on Guidant on May 18 and June 25, 2006, respectively. Guidant has moved to dismiss both cases. Hearings on the motions have not yet been scheduled.
 
In January 2006, Guidant was served with a civil False Claims Act qui tam lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee in September 2003 by Robert Fry, a former employee alleged to have worked for Guidant from 1981 to 1997. The civil lawsuit claims that Guidant violated federal law and the laws of the States of Tennessee, Florida and California, by allegedly concealing limited warranties related to some upgraded or replaced medical devices, thereby allegedly causing hospitals to allegedly file reimbursement claims with federal and state healthcare programs for amounts that did not reflect available warranty credits. To date, none of these states have formally intervened in this case. On April 25, 2006, the Court denied Guidant’s motion to dismiss the complaint and ordered the plaintiff to file a second amended complaint. On May 4, 2006, the plaintiff filed a second amended complaint. On May 24, 2006, Guidant moved to dismiss that complaint, which was denied by the Court on September 13, 2006. On October 16, 2006, the United States filed a motion to intervene in this action, which was approved by the Court on November 2, 2006.

The Securities and Exchange Commission has begun a formal inquiry into issues related to certain of Guidant’s product disclosures and trading in Guidant stock. Guidant is cooperating with the inquiry.

On November 3, 2005, a securities class action complaint was filed on behalf of Guidant shareholders in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, against Guidant and several of its officers. The complaint alleges that the defendants concealed adverse information about Guidant’s defibrillators and pacemakers and sold stock in violation of federal securities laws. The complaint seeks a declaration that the lawsuit can be maintained as a class action, monetary damages, and injunctive relief. Several additional, related securities class actions were filed in November 2005 and January 2006, and were consolidated with the initial complaint filed on November 3, 2005. The Court issued an order consolidating the complaints and appointed the Iron Workers of Western Pennsylvania Pension Plan and David Fannon as lead plaintiffs. Lead plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint. In August 2006, the defendants moved to dismiss the complaint. A hearing has not yet been scheduled.

In October 2005, Guidant received administrative subpoenas from the U.S. Department of Justice U.S. Attorney’s offices in Boston and Minneapolis, issued under the Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act of 1996. The subpoena from the U.S. Attorney’s office in Boston requests documents concerning marketing practices for pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, leads and related products. The subpoena from the U.S. Attorney’s office in Minneapolis requests documents relating to Guidant’s VENTAK PRIZM 2 and CONTAK RENEWAL and CONTAK RENEWAL 2 devices. Guidant is cooperating in these matters.
 
On May 3, 2006, Emergency Care Research Institute (ECRI) filed a complaint against Guidant in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania generally seeking a declaration that ECRI may publish confidential pricing information about Guidant’s medical devices. The complaint seeks, on constitutional and other grounds, a declaration that confidentiality clauses contained in contracts between Guidant and its customers are not binding and that ECRI does not tortiously interfere with Guidant’s contractual relations by obtaining and publishing Guidant pricing information. Guidant’s motion to transfer the matter to Minnesota was denied and discovery is proceeding in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. A trial is expected to be scheduled in late 2007 or early 2008.
 
In February 2003, Boston Scientific completed its acquisition of Inflow Dynamics, Inc. pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated December 2, 2002, among Boston Scientific, Inflow Dynamics, the stockholders of Inflow Dynamics and Eckard Alt, Donald Green and Jerry Griffin, acting in each case solely as members of the Stockholder Representative Committee (the “Merger Agreement”). On September 21, 2006, the Stockholder Representative Committee made a demand for arbitration pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement seeking contingent payments with respect to the sales of our Liberte stent system and TAXUS Liberte stent system. A hearing is scheduled before a panel of arbitrators on June 28 and 29, 2007.
 
On July 17, 2006, Carla Woods and Jeffrey Goldberg, as Trustees of the Bionics Trust and Stockholders’ Representative, filed a lawsuit against us in the U. S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleges that we breached the Agreement and Plan of Merger among Boston Scientific Corporation, Advanced Bionics Corporation, the Bionics Trust, Alfred E. Mann, Jeffrey H. Greiner, and David MacCallum, collectively in their capacity as Stockholders’ Representative, and others dated May 28, 2004 (“the Merger Agreement”) or, alternatively, the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The complaint seeks injunctive and other relief. On February 20, 2007, the Court entered a preliminary injunction prohibiting Boston Scientific from taking certain actions until it completes specific actions described in the Merger Agreement. On February 22, 2007, the plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to amend their complaint to add rescission of the Merger Agreement as an additional possible remedy. That motion has not yet been briefed. No scheduling order has been entered by the court, and no trial date has been set.
 
On January 16, 2007, the French Conseil de la Concurrence (one of the bodies responsible for the enforcement of antitrust/competition law in France) issued a Statement of Objections alleging that Guidant had agreed with the four other main suppliers of ICDs in France to collectively refrain from responding to a 2001 tender for ICDs conducted by a group of 17 University Hospital Centers in France. This alleged collusion is said to be contrary to the French Commercial Code and Article 81 of the European Community Treaty. We are in the process of evaluating this matter.
 
FDA Warning Letters
 
On December 23, 2005, Guidant received an FDA warning letter citing certain deficiencies with respect to its manufacturing quality systems and record-keeping procedures in its CRM facility in St. Paul, Minnesota. This FDA warning letter followed an inspection completed by the FDA on September 1, 2005 and cited a number of observations. Guidant received a follow-up letter from the FDA dated January 5, 2006. As stated in this follow-up letter, until we have corrected the identified deficiencies, the FDA may not grant requests for exportation certificates to foreign governments or approve PMA applications for class III devices to which the deficiencies described are reasonably related. The FDA conducted a further inspection of the CRM facility between December 15, 2005 and February 9, 2006 and made one additional inspectional observation. The FDA has concluded its reinspection of our CRM facilities.

On January 26, 2006, legacy Boston Scientific received a corporate warning letter from the FDA, notifying us of serious regulatory problems at three facilities and advising us that our corrective action plan relating to three site-specific warning letters issued to us in 2005 was inadequate. As
 
also stated in this FDA warning letter, the FDA may not grant our requests for exportation certificates to foreign governments or approve PMA applications for class III devices to which the quality control or current good manufacturing practices deficiencies described in the letter are reasonably related until the deficiencies have been corrected.
 
Litigation-Related Charges
 
In 2005, we recorded a $780 million pre-tax charge associated with the Medinol litigation settlement. On September 21, 2005, we reached a settlement with Medinol resolving certain contract and patent infringement litigation. In conjunction with the settlement agreement, we paid $750 million in cash and cancelled our equity investment in Medinol.
 
In 2004, we recorded a $75 million provision for certain legal and regulatory matters, which included a civil settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice, which we paid in 2005.
 
Note K—Stockholders’ Equity

Preferred Stock

We are authorized to issue 50 million shares of preferred stock in one or more series and to fix the powers, designations, preferences and relative participating, option or other rights thereof, including dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, redemption terms, liquidation preferences and the number of shares constituting any series, without any further vote or action by our stockholders. At December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, we had no shares of preferred stock issued or outstanding.

Common Stock
 
We are authorized to issue 2.0 billion shares of common stock, $.01 par value per share. During the first quarter of 2006, we increased our authorized common stock from 1.2 billion shares to 2.0 billion shares in anticipation of the Guidant acquisition. Holders of common stock are entitled to one vote per share. Holders of common stock are entitled to receive dividends, if and when declared by the Board of Directors, and to share ratably in our assets legally available for distribution to our stockholders in the event of liquidation. Holders of common stock have no preemptive, subscription, redemption, or conversion rights. The holders of common stock do not have cumulative voting rights. The holders of a majority of the shares of common stock can elect all of the directors and can control our management and affairs.

During 2004, we modified certain of our stock option plans, principally for options granted prior to May 2001, to change the definition of retirement to conform to the definition generally used in our stock option plans subsequent to May 2001. As a result of these modifications, we recorded a $90 million charge ($60 million after-tax) in 2004. The key assumptions in estimating the charge were the anticipated retirement age and the expected exercise patterns for the individuals whose options we modified.

We did not repurchase any shares of our common stock during 2006. We repurchased approximately 25 million shares of our common stock at an aggregate cost of $734 million in 2005, and 10 million shares of our common stock at an aggregate cost of $360 million in 2004. Since 1992, we have repurchased approximately 132 million shares of our common stock and have approximately 12 million shares of common stock held in treasury at year-end.
 
Approximately 37 million shares remain under previous share repurchase authorizations. Repurchased shares are available for reissuance under our equity incentive plans and for general corporate purposes, including strategic alliances and acquisitions.

Note L—Stock Ownership Plans

Employee and Director Stock Incentive Plans

Our 2000 and 2003 Long-Term Incentive Plans (Plans) provide for the issuance of up to 90 million shares of common stock. Together, the Plans cover officers, directors, employees and consultants and provide for the grant of various incentives, including qualified and nonqualified options, deferred stock units, stock grants, share appreciation rights, performance-based awards and market-based awards. The Executive Compensation and Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors, consisting of independent, non-employee directors, may authorize the issuance of common stock and authorized cash awards under the plans in recognition of the achievement of long-term performance objectives established by the Committee.
 
Nonqualified options issued to employees generally are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of our stock on the grant date, generally vest over a four-year service period, and have a 10-year contractual life. In the case of qualified options, if the recipient owns more than 10 percent of the voting power of all classes of stock, the option granted will be at an exercise price of 110 percent of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant and will expire over a period not to exceed five years. Non-vested stock awards (awards other than options) issued to employees generally are granted with an exercise price of zero and t ypically vest in four to five equal annual installments beginning with the second anniversary of the date of grant. These awards represent our commitment to issue shares to recipients after a vesting period. The slightly longer vesting period for non-vested stock awards reflects the fact that they have immediate value compared to options, which only have value if our stock price increases. Upon each vesting date, such awards are no longer subject to risk of forfeiture and we issue shares of our common stock to the recipient. We generally issue shares for option exercises and non-vested stock from our treasury, if available.

During 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment , which is a revision of Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation . Statement No. 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and amends Statement No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows . In general, Statement No. 123(R) contains similar accounting concepts as those described in Statement No. 123. However, Statement No. 123(R) requires that we recognize all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, in our consolidated statements of operations based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative.

We adopted Statement No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006 using the “modified-prospective method,” which is a method in which compensation cost is recognized beginning with the effective date (i) based on the requirements of Statement No. 123(R) for all share-based payments granted after the effective date and (ii) based on the requirements of Statement No. 123 for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date of Statement No. 123(R) that remain unvested on the effective date. In accordance with this method of adoption, we have not restated prior period results of operations and financial position to reflect the impact of stock-based compensation expense. Prior to the adoption of Statement No. 123(R), we accounted for options using the intrinsic value method under the guidance of APB Opinion No. 25, and provided pro forma disclosure as allowed by Statement No. 123.

The following presents the impact on our consolidated statement of operations of stock-based compensation expense recognized for the year ended December 31, 2006 for options and restricted stock awards:

(in millions)
     
Cost of products sold
 
$
15
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses
   
74
 
Research and development expenses
   
24
 
Loss before income taxes
   
113
 
Income tax benefit
   
32
 
Net loss
 
$
81
 
         
Net loss per common share - basic
 
$
0.06
 
Net loss per common share - assuming dilution
 
$
0.06
 

For the year ended December 31, 2006, as a result of adopting Statement No. 123(R), our loss before income taxes was $68 million lower and our net loss was $48 million lower than if we had continued to account for share-based compensation under APB Opinion No. 25. Basic and diluted loss per share was $0.04 lower than if we had continued to account for share-based compensation under APB Opinion No. 25.

If we had elected to recognize compensation expense for the granting of options under stock option plans based on the fair values at the grant date consistent with the methodology prescribed by Statement No. 123, we would have reported net income and net income per share as the following pro forma amounts:
 
 
 

 

   
Year Ended December 31,  
 
(in millions, except per share data)  
 
2005
 
2004
 
 
         
Net income, as reported
 
$  
628
 
$  
1,062
 
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in net income, net of related tax effects
   
13
   
62
 
Less: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax benefits
   
(74
)
 
(67
)
               
Pro forma net income
 
$
567
 
$
1,057
 
               
Net income per common share
             
Basic
             
Reported
 
$
0.76
 
$
1.27
 
Pro forma
 
$  
0.69
 
$  
1.26
 
Assuming dilution
             
Reported
 
$  
0.75
 
$  
1.24
 
Pro forma
 
$  
0.68
 
$  
1.24
 

Stock Options

Option Valuation
 
We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of our stock options. In conjunction with the Guidant acquisition, we converted certain outstanding Guidant options into approximately 40 million fully vested Boston Scientific options. See Note D - Business Combinations for further details regarding the fair value and valuation assumptions related to those awards. The fair value for all other options granted during 2006, 2005 and 2004 was calculated using the following estimated weighted average assumptions:

   
Year Ended December 31,
 
   
2006
 
2005
 
2004
 
Options granted (in thousands)
   
5,438
   
7,983
   
2,101
 
Weighted-average exercise price
 
$
21.48
 
$
30.12
 
$
39.72
 
Weighted-average grant-date fair value
 
$
7.61
 
$
12.18
 
$
14.36
 
                     
Black-Scholes Assumptions
                   
Expected volatility
   
30
%
 
37
%
 
47
%
Expected term (in years)
   
5
   
5
   
5
 
Risk-free interest rate
   
4.26% - 5.18
%
 
3.37% - 4.47
%
 
2.24% - 4.05
%
 
Expected Volatility

We have considered a number of factors in estimating volatility. For options granted prior to 2006, we used our historical volatility as a basis to estimate expected volatility in our valuation of
 
stock options. We changed our method of estimating volatility upon the adoption of Statement No. 123(R). We now consider historical volatility, trends in volatility within our industry/peer group, and implied volatility.

Expected Term

We estimate the expected term of our options using historical exercise and forfeiture data. We believe that this historical data is currently the best estimate of the expected term of our new option grants.

Risk-Free Interest Rate

We use yield rates on U.S. Treasury securities for a period approximating the expected term of the award to estimate the risk-free interest rate in our grant-date fair value assessment.

Expected Dividend Yield

We have not historically paid cash dividends to our shareholders. We currently do not intend to pay dividends, and intend to retain all of our earnings to repay indebtedness and invest in the continued growth of our business. Therefore, we have assumed an expected dividend yield of zero in our grant-date fair value assessment.

 
Information related to stock options at December 31, 2006 under stock incentive plans is as follows:
 
   
Options
(in thousands)
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (in years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(in millions)
 
Outstanding at January 1, 2004
   
66,103
 
$
15
             
Granted
   
2,101
   
40
             
Exercised
   
(18,296
)
 
11
             
Cancelled/forfeited
   
(880
)
 
18
             
Outstanding at December 31, 2004
   
49,028
 
$
18
             
Granted
   
7,983
   
30
             
Exercised
   
(5,105
)
 
12
             
Cancelled/forfeited
   
(1,621
)
 
28
             
Outstanding at December 31, 2005
   
50,285
 
$
20
             
Guidant converted options
   
39,649
   
13
             
Granted
   
5,438
   
21
             
Exercised
   
(10,548
)
 
11
             
Cancelled/forfeited
   
(1,793
)
 
25
             
Outstanding at December 31, 2006
   
83,031
 
$
18
   
5
 
$
233
 
Exercisable at December 31, 2006
   
68,718
 
$
16
   
4
 
$
231
 
Expected to vest as of December 31, 2006
   
80,802
 
$
18
   
5
 
$
232
 
 
The total intrinsic value of options exercised in 2006 was $102 million as compared to $88 million in 2005.
 
Non-Vested Stock

Award Valuation
 
We value restricted stock awards and deferred stock units based on the closing trading value of our shares on the date of grant.

Award Activity
 
Information related to non-vested stock awards during 2006 is as follows:
 
   
Non-Vested
Stock Award Units
(in thousands)
 
Weighted Average
Grant- Date
Fair Value
 
Balance at January 1, 2006
   
3,834
 
$
30
 
Granted
   
6,580
   
23
 
Vested
   
(52
)
 
32
 
Forfeited
   
(487
)
 
28
 
Balance at December 31, 2006
   
9,875
 
$
26
 

CEO Award

During the first quarter of 2006, we granted a special market-based award of 2 million deferred stock units to our chief executive officer. The attainment of this award is based on the individual’s continued employment and our stock reaching certain specified prices as of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2009. We determined the fair value of the award to be approximately $15 million based on a Monte Carlo simulation, using the following assumptions:

Stock price on date of grant
 
$
24.42
 
Expected volatility
   
30
%
Expected term (in years)
   
3.84
 
Risk-free rate
   
4.64
%
 
We will recognize the expense in our consolidated statement of operations using an accelerated attribution method through 2009.

Expense Attribution
 
We generally recognize compensation expense for our stock awards issued subsequent to the adoption of Statement No. 123(R) using a straight-line method over the substantive vesting period. Prior to the adoption of Statement No. 123(R), we allocated the pro forma compensation expense for stock option awards over the vesting period using an accelerated attribution method. We will continue to amortize compensation expense related to stock option awards granted prior to the adoption of Statement No. 123(R) using an accelerated attribution method. Prior to the adoption of Statement No. 123(R), we recognized compensation expense for non-vested stock awards over the vesting period using a straight-line method. We will continue to amortize
 
compensation expense related to non-vested stock awards granted prior to the adoption of Statement No. 123(R) using a straight-line method.

We recognize stock-based compensation for the value of the portion of awards that are ultimately expected to vest. Statement No. 123(R) requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The term “forfeitures” is distinct from “cancellations” or “expirations” and represents only the unvested portion of the surrendered option. We have applied, based on an analysis of our historical forfeitures, an annual forfeiture rate of eight percent to all unvested stock awards as of December 31, 2006, which represents the portion that we expect will be forfeited each year over the vesting period. We will re-evaluate this analysis periodically and adjust the forfeiture rate as necessary. Ultimately, we will only recognize expense for those shares that vest.
 
Most of our stock awards provide for immediate vesting upon retirement, death or disability of the participant. We have traditionally accounted for the pro forma compensation expense related to stock-based awards made to retirement eligible individuals using the stated vesting period of the award. This approach results in the recognition of compensation expense over the vesting period except in the instance of the participant’s actual retirement. Statement No. 123(R) clarified the accounting for stock-based awards made to retirement eligible individuals, which explicitly provides that the vesting period for a grant made to a retirement eligible employee is considered non-substantive and should be ignored when determining the period over which the award should be expensed. Upon adoption of Statement No. 123(R), we are required to expense stock-based awards over the period between grant date and retirement eligibility or immediately if the employee is retirement eligible at the date of grant. If we had historically accounted for stock-based awards made to retirement eligible individuals under these requirements, the pro forma expense disclosed in the table above for 2005 and 2004 would not have been materially impacted.

Unrecognized Compensation Cost

Under the provisions of Statement No. 123(R), we expect to recognize the following future expense for awards granted as of December 31, 2006:
 
   
Unrecognized
Compensation
Cost
(in millions)*
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Vesting Period
(in years)
 
Stock options
 
$
63
       
Non-vested stock awards
   
131
       
   
$
194
   
3.3
 

 *Amounts presented represent compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures.

Tax Impact of Stock-Based Compensation

Prior to the adoption of Statement No. 123(R), we reported the benefit of tax deductions in excess of recognized share-based compensation expense on our consolidated statement of cash flows as
 
operating cash flows. Under Statement No. 123(R), such excess tax benefits must be reported as financing cash flows. Although total cash flows under Statement No. 123(R) remain unchanged from what we would have reported under prior accounting standards, our net operating cash flows are reduced and our net financing cash flows are increased due to the adoption of Statement No. 123(R). There were excess tax benefits of $7 million for 2006, which we have classified as financing cash flows. There were excess tax benefits of $28 million for 2005 and $185 million for 2004, which we have classified as operating cash flows.

Shares reserved for future issuance under our stock incentive plans totaled approximately 88 million at December 31, 2006.
 
Employee Stock Purchase Plans

In 2006, our stockholders approved and adopted a new global employee stock purchase plan that provides for the granting of options to purchase up to 20 million shares of our common stock to all eligible employees. The terms and conditions of the 2006 employee stock purchase plan are substantially similar to the previous employee stock purchase plan, which expires by its terms in 2007. Under the employee stock purchase plan, we grant each eligible employee, at the beginning of each six-month offering period, an option to purchase shares of our common stock equal to not more than 10 percent of the employee’s eligible compensation or the statutory limit under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Such options may be exercised generally only to the extent of accumulated payroll deductions at the end of the offering period, at a purchase price equal to 85 percent of the fair market value of our common stock at the beginning or end of each offering period, whichever is less. For the offering period beginning July 1, 2007, the employee stock purchase plan was amended to reduce the employee discount for purchasing stock through the program from 15 percent to 10 percent. At December 31, 2006, there were approximately 21 million shares available for future issuance under the employee stock purchase plan.

Information related to the shares issued under the employee stock purchase plan and the range of purchase prices is as follows:
 
   
2006
 
2005
 
2004
 
Shares issued
   
2,765,000
   
1,445,000
   
1,004,000
 
Range of purchase prices
 
 
$14.20 - $14.31
 
 
$20.82 - $22.95
 
$30.22 - $30.81
 

We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to calculate the grant-date fair value of shares issued under the employee stock purchase plan. We recognize expense related to shares purchased through the employee stock purchase plan ratably over the offering period. During 2006, we recognized $12 million in expense associated with our employee stock purchase plan.

In connection with our acquisition of Guidant, we assumed Guidant’s employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) which matches employee 401(k) contributions in the form of stock. Common shares held by the ESOP are allocated among participants’ accounts on a periodic basis until these shares are exhausted. At December 31, 2006, the ESOP held approximately 6.4 million shares allocated to employee accounts and approximately 2.6 million unallocated shares. We report the cost of shares held by the ESOP and not yet allocated to employees as a reduction of stockholders’ equity. Allocated shares of the ESOP are charged to expense based on the fair value of the shares transferred and are treated as outstanding in the computation of earnings per share. As part of the Guidant purchase accounting, we recognized deferred costs of $86 million for the fair value of the shares that were unallocated on the date of acquisition. Since the acquisition date,
 
we have recognized compensation expense of $19 million related to the plan. The fair value of the unallocated shares at December 31, 2006 was $44 million.

Note M—Earnings per Share

The computation of basic and diluted earnings per share is as follows:
 
(in millions, except per share data)
 
2006
 
2005
 
2004
 
Basic
             
Net (loss) income
 
$
(3,577
)
$
628
 
$
1,062
 
Weighted average shares outstanding
   
1,273.7
   
825.8
   
838.2
 
Net (loss) income per common share
 
$
(2.81
)
$
0.76
 
$
1.27
 
                     
Assuming dilution
                   
Net (loss) income
 
$
(3,577
)
$
628
 
$
1,062
 
Weighted average shares outstanding
   
1,273.7
   
825.8
   
838.2
 
Net effect of common stock equivalents
         
11.8
   
19.5
 
Total
   
1,273.7
   
837.6
   
857.7
 
Net (loss) income per common share
 
$
(2.81
)
$
0.75
 
$
1.24
 

The calculation of net (loss) income per common share, assuming dilution, above excludes the net effect of common stock equivalents of 15.6 million for 2006 due to our net loss position for the year ended December 31, 2006.

The net effect of common stock equivalents excludes the impact of 30 million stock options for 2006, 12 million for 2005, and 1 million for 2004 due to the exercise prices of these stock options being greater than the average fair market value of our common stock during the year. 

Note N—Segment Reporting

We have four reportable operating segments based on geographic regions: the United States, Europe, Japan and Inter-Continental. Each of our reportable segments generates revenues from the sale of less-invasive medical devices. The reportable segments represent an aggregate of all operating divisions within each segment. We measure and evaluate our reportable segments based on segment income. This segment income excludes certain corporate and manufacturing expenses associated with divisions that do not meet the definition of a segment, as defined by FASB Statement No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. In addition, certain transactions or adjustments that our chief operating decision maker considers to be non-recurring and/or non-operational, as well as stock-based compensation and amortization expense are excluded from segment income. Although we exclude these amounts from segment income, they are included in reported consolidated net (loss) income and are included in the reconciliation below.

Sales and operating results of reportable segments are based on internally derived standard foreign exchange rates, which may differ from year to year and do not include intersegment profits. We have restated the segment information for 2005 and 2004 net sales and operating results based on our standard foreign exchange rates used for 2006. Because of the interdependence of the reportable segments, the operating profit as presented may not be representative of the geographic distribution that would occur if the segments were not
 
interdependent. We base enterprise-wide information on actual foreign exchange rates used in our consolidated financial statements.
 
( in millions)
 
United
States
 
Europe
 
Japan
 
Inter-
Continental
 
Total
 
2006
                     
Net sales
 
$
4,840
 
$
1,529
 
$
630
 
$
783
 
$
7,782
 
Depreciation
   
70
   
12
   
4
   
6
   
92
 
Segment income
   
2,273
   
767
   
337
   
382
   
3,759
 
2005
                               
Net sales
 
$
3,852
 
$
1,152
 
$
579
 
$
675
 
$
6,258
 
Depreciation
   
18
   
5
   
3
   
4
   
30
 
Segment income
   
1,815
   
644
   
308
   
332
   
3,099
 
2004
                               
Net sales
 
$
3,502
 
$
982
 
$
602
 
$
497
 
$
5,583
 
Depreciation
   
10
   
5
   
3
   
3
   
21
 
Segment income
   
1,753
   
557
   
343
   
232
   
2,885
 

A reconciliation of the totals reported for the reportable segments to the applicable line items in our consolidated financial statements is as follows:
 
(in millions)
 
2006
 
2005
 
2004
 
Net sales
             
Total net sales allocated to reportable segments
 
$
7,782
 
$
6,258
 
$
5,583
 
Foreign exchange
   
39
   
25
   
41
 
   
$
7,821
 
$
6,283
 
$
5,624
 
                     
Depreciation
                   
Total depreciation allocated to reportable segments
 
$
92
 
$
30
 
$
21
 
Manufacturing operations
   
76
   
89
   
113
 
Depreciation included in special charges
   
17
             
Corporate expenses and foreign exchange
   
66
   
43
   
29
 
   
$
251
 
$
162
 
$
163
 
                     
(Loss) income before income taxes
                   
Total operating income allocated to reportable segments
 
$
3,759
 
$
3,099
 
$
2,885
 
Manufacturing operations
   
(617
)
 
(449
)
 
(396
)
Corporate expenses and foreign exchange
   
(920
)
 
(409
)
 
(462
)
Purchase accounting adjustments
   
(4,453
)
 
(276
)
 
(65
)
Acquisition-related and other costs
                   
Integration costs
   
(61
)
           
CRM technology offering charge
   
(31
)
           
Certain retirement benefits
         
(17
)
 
(110
)
Business optimization charges
   
(19
)
 
(39
)
     
TriVascular AAA program cancellation costs, including amortization expense
   
13
             
Litigation-related charges
         
(780
)
 
(75
)
Amortization and stock-based compensation expense
   
(620
)
 
(161
)
 
(203
)
     
(2,949
)
 
968
   
1,574
 
Other income (expense)
   
(586
)
 
(77
)
 
(80
)
   
$
(3,535
)
$
891
 
$
1,494
 

 
Enterprise-Wide Information

(in millions)
 
2006
 
2005
 
2004
 
               
Net sales
             
               
Interventional Cardiology
 
$
3,612
 
$
3,783
 
$
3,451
 
Cardiac Rhythm Management
   
1,371
   
N/A
   
N/A
 
Other
   
1,258
   
1,124
   
1,039
 
Cardiovascular
   
6,241
   
4,907
   
4,490
 
                     
Endosurgery
   
1,346
   
1,228
   
1,088
 
                     
Neuromodulation
   
234
   
148
   
46
 
                     
Worldwide
 
$
7,821
 
$
6,283
 
$
5,624
 
                     
                     
Long-lived assets
                   
United States
 
$
1,343
 
$
795
 
$
660
 
Ireland
   
199
   
140
   
149
 
Other foreign countries
   
184
   
76
   
61
 
   
$
1,726
 
$
1,011
 
$
870
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Consolidated Financial Statements
 
 
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Boston Scientific Corporation
 
        We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Boston Scientific Corporation as of December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
 
        We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
        In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Boston Scientific Corporation at December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
 
As discussed in Notes A and L to the consolidated financial statements, on January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment .
 
        We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Boston Scientific Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 26, 2007, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
 
 
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
 
Boston, Massachusetts
February 26, 2007
 
QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(in millions, except per share data)
(unaudited)
 
Three Months Ended
 
March 31,
 
June 30,
 
Sept 30,
 
Dec 31,
 
                   
2006
                 
Net sales
 
$
1,620
 
$
2,110
 
$
2,026
 
$
2,065
 
Gross profit
   
1,246
   
1,433
   
1,396
   
1,539
 
Operating income (loss)
   
497
   
(3,925
)
 
195
   
284
 
Net income (loss)
   
332
   
(4,262
)
 
76
   
277
 
Net income (loss) per common share - basic
 
$
0.40
 
$
(3.21
)
$
0.05
 
$
0.19
 
Net income (loss) per common share - assuming dilution
 
$
0.40
 
$
(3.21
)
$
0.05
 
$
0.19
 
                           
2005
                         
Net sales
 
$  
1,615
 
$  
1,617
 
$  
1,511
 
$  
1,540
 
Gross profit
   
1,271
   
1,260
   
1,168
   
1,198
 
Operating income (loss)
   
513
   
326
   
(336
)
 
465
 
Net income (loss)
   
358
   
205
   
(269
)
 
334
 
Net income (loss) per common share - basic
 
$
0.43
 
$
0.25
 
$
(0.33
)
$
0.41
 
Net income (loss) per common share - assuming dilution
 
$
0.42
 
$
0.24
 
$
(0.33
)
$
0.40
 
 
 
During 2006, we recorded net after-tax charges of $29 million in the first quarter, $4.541 billion in the second quarter, $77 million in the third quarter and net credits of $127 million in the fourth quarter. The net charges for the year consisted of: a non-cash charge for purchased in-process research and development costs related to the Guidant acquisition; a charge resulting from a purchase accounting associated with the step-up value of acquired Guidant inventory sold; other charges related primarily to the Guidant acquisition, including the fair value adjustment related to the sharing of proceeds feature of the Abbott stock purchase; and a credit associated with the reversal of tax accruals previously established for offshore unremitted earnings. In 2006, amortization expense, net of tax, was $398 million and stock-based compensation expense, net of tax, was $89 million.
 
During 2005, we recorded after-tax charges of $73 million in the first quarter, $199 million in the second quarter, $616 million in the third quarter and $6 million in the fourth quarter. The net charges for the year consisted of: a litigation settlement with Medinol, Ltd.; purchased research and development; expenses related to certain retirement benefits; asset write-downs and employee-related costs that resulted from certain business optimization initiatives; and a benefit for a tax adjustment associated with a technical correction made to the American Jobs Creation Act. In 2005, amortization expense, net of tax, was $108 million and stock-based compensation expense, net of tax, was $14 million.
 

None.

 
 
Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President—Finance & Administration and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2006 pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that material information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms and ensure that such material information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on their evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of December 31, 2006, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management's report on our internal control over financial reporting is contained in Item 7 above.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The report of Ernst & Young LLP on our internal control over financial reporting is contained in Item 7 above.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During the quarter ended December 31, 2006, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


None.
 
 
 
Our directors and executive officers as of December 31, 2006, were as follows:
 
DIRECTORS
   
John E. Abele
69
Director, Founder
Ursula M. Burns
48
Director, President, Business Group Operations and Corporate Senior Vice President, Xerox Corporation
Nancy-Ann DeParle
50
Director, Managing Director, CCMP Capital Advisors, LLC
Joel L. Fleishman
72
Director, Professor of Law and Public Policy, Duke University
Marye Anne Fox, Ph.D.
59
Director, Chancellor of the University of California, San Diego
Ray J. Groves
71
Director, Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Ernst & Young
Kristina M. Johnson
49
Director, Dean of the Pratt School of Engineering, Duke University
Ernest Mario, Ph.D.
68
Director, Chairman, Reliant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
N.J. Nicholas, Jr.
67
Director, Private Investor
Pete M. Nicholas
65
Director, Founder, Chairman of the Board
John E. Pepper
68
Director, Chief Executive Officer, National Underground Railroad Freedom Center
Uwe E. Reinhardt, Ph.D.
69
Director, Professor of Political Economy and Economics and Public Affairs, Princeton University
Senator Warren B. Rudman
76
Director, Former U.S. Senator, Of Counsel, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton, & Garrison LLP
James R. Tobin
62
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
     
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
   
Donald Baim, M.D.
57
Senior Vice President, Chief Medical and Scientific Officer
Mark Bartell
46
Senior Vice President, Global Sales & Marketing for CRM
Lawrence C. Best
57
Executive Vice President-Finance & Administration and Chief Financial Officer
 
Brian R. Burns
42
Senior Vice President, Quality
Fredericus A. Colen
54
Executive Vice President, Operations and Technology, CRM and Chief Technology Officer
Paul Donovan
51
Senior Vice President, Corporate Communications
Jim Gilbert
49
Group President, Cardiovascular
Jeffrey H. Goodman
59
Executive Vice President, International
William H. (Hank) Kucheman
57
Senior Vice President and Group President of Interventional Cardiology
Paul A. LaViolette
49
Chief Operating Officer
William McConnell
57
Senior Vice President, Administration, CRM
Stephen F. Moreci
55
Senior Vice President and Group President, Endosurgery
Kenneth J. Pucel
40
Executive Vice President, Operations
Lucia L. Quinn
53
Executive Vice President, Human Resources
Paul W. Sandman
59
Executive Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel
 
 
John E. Abele, our co-founder, has been a director of Boston Scientific since 1979. Mr. Abele was our Treasurer from 1979 to 1992, our Co-Chairman from 1979 to 1995 and our Vice Chairman and Founder, Office of the Chairman from February 1995 to March 1996. Mr. Abele is also the owner of The Kingbridge Centre and Institute, a 120-room conference center in Ontario that provides special services and research to businesses, academia and government. He was President of Medi-tech, Inc. from 1970 to 1983, and prior to that served in sales, technical and general management positions for Advanced Instruments, Inc. Mr. Abele serves on the board of directors of Color Kinetics, is the Chairman of the Board of the FIRST (For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology) Foundation and is also a member of numerous not-for-profit boards. Mr. Abele received a B.A. degree from Amherst College.
 
Donald S. Baim, M.D. joined Boston Scientific in July 2006 and is our Senior Vice President, Chief Medical and Scientific Officer. Prior to joining Boston Scientific, Dr. Baim was a Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School, Senior Physician at the Brigham and Women’s Hospital. He has served as a member of the Interventional Cardiology Test Committee of the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM). In 1981, Dr. Baim was recruited to establish an Interventional Cardiology program at Boston’s Beth Israel Hospital to establish an interventional cardiology program. In 2000, he joined the Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, where in addition to his clinical responsibilities, he directed the hospital’s participation in the Center for the Integration of Medicine and Innovative Technology (CIMIT). Since 2005, Dr. Baim has also served as Chief Academic Officer of the Harvard Clinical Research Institute (HCRI), a not-for-profit organization that designs, conducts, and analyzes pilot and pivotal trials of new medical devices to support their approval by the FDA. Dr. Baim completed his undergraduate training in Physics at the University of Chicago, and then received a M.D. from Yale University School of Medicine.
Mark C. Bartell joined Boston Scientific in April 2006 following our acquisition of Guidant and is our Senior Vice President, Global Sales & Marketing for CRM. Prior to joining Boston Scientific, Mr. Bartell served as President of the United States Sales Operations at Guidant Corporation. Prior to that role, he served as Vice President, Marketing for Guidant’s Cardiac Rhythm Management group and Vice President and General Manager of the guide wire business unit at Guidant’s Vascular Intervention group. Mr. Bartell joined Cardiac Pacemakers Inc., which became part of Guidant’s CRM group, in 1985 as a Financial Analyst. He held positions in new product planning, product management and as a Sales Representative. Mr. Bartell earned his B.S. degree from the University of Florida, and a Master of Business Administration from the University of Michigan.
 
Lawrence C. Best joined Boston Scientific in 1992 and is our Executive Vice President-Finance & Administration and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to joining Boston Scientific, Mr. Best was a partner in the accounting firm of Ernst & Young, where he specialized in serving multinational companies in the high technology and life sciences fields. He served a two-year fellowship at the SEC from 1979 to 1981 and a one-year term as a White House-appointed Presidential Exchange Executive in Washington, D.C. He serves on the boards of directors of Biogen-Idec, Inc. and Haemonetics Corp. and is a founding director of the President’s Council at Massachusetts General Hospital. Mr. Best received a B.B.A. degree from Kent State University.
 
Brian R. Burns has been our Senior Vice President of Quality since December 2004. Previously, Mr. Burns was our Vice President of Global Quality Assurance from January 2003 to December 2004, our Vice President of Cardiology Quality Assurance from January 2002 to January 2003 and our Director of Quality Assurance from April 2000 to January 2002. Prior to joining Boston Scientific, Mr. Burns held various positions with Cardinal Healthcare, Allegiance Healthcare and Baxter Healthcare. Mr. Burns received his B.S. degree in chemical engineering from the University of Arkansas.
 
Ursula M. Burns has been a Director of Boston Scientific since 2002. Ms. Burns is President of Business Group Operations and Corporate Senior Vice President of Xerox Corporation. Ms. Burns joined Xerox in 1980, subsequently advancing through several engineering and management positions. Ms. Burns served as Vice President and General Manager, Departmental Business Unit from 1997 to 1999, Senior Vice President, Worldwide Manufacturing and Supply Chain Services from 1999 to 2000, Senior Vice President, Corporate Strategic Services from 2000 to October 2001 and President of Document Systems and Solutions Group until her most recent appointment in January 2003. She serves on the boards of directors of American Express Corporation, the National Association of Manufacturers, the F.I.R.S.T. Foundation and the Rochester Business Alliance and is a Trustee of the University of Rochester. Ms. Burns earned a B.S. degree from Polytechnic Institute of New York and an M.S. degree in mechanical engineering from Columbia University.
 
Fredericus A. Colen is our Executive Vice President, Operations and Technology, CRM and Chief Technology Officer. Mr. Colen joined Boston Scientific in 1999 as Vice President of Research and Development of Scimed and, in February 2001, he was promoted to Senior Vice President, Cardiovascular Technology of Scimed. Before joining Boston Scientific, he worked for several medical device companies, including Guidant Corporation, where he launched the Delta TDDD Pacemaker platform, and St. Jude Medical, where he served as Managing Director for the European subsidiary of
 
the Cardiac Rhythm Management Division and as Executive Vice President, responsible for worldwide R&D for implantable pacemaker systems. Mr. Colen was educated in The Netherlands and Germany and holds the U.S. equivalent of a Master’s Degree in Electrical Engineering with a focus on medical technology from the Technical University in Aachen, Germany. He was the Vice President of the International Association of Prosthesis Manufacturers (IAPM) in Brussels from 1995 to 1997.
 
Nancy-Ann DeParle has been a Director of Boston Scientific since our acquisition of Guidant in April 2006. Since August 2006, Ms. DeParle has been a Managing Director of CCMP Capital Advisors, LLC.  She was a Senior Advisor for JP Morgan Partners from 2000 to 2006, and prior to that she served as the Administrator of the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) (now the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) from 1997 to 2000.  Prior to her role at HCFA, she was the Associate Director for Health and Personnel at the White House Office of Management and Budget and served as commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Human Services.  Ms. DeParle is a director of Cerner Corporation, DaVita Inc. and Triad Hospitals, Inc.  She is also a trustee of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and serves on the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission.  Ms. DeParle received a B.A. degree from the University of Tennessee, a J.D. from Harvard Law School, and B.A. and M.A. degrees in Politics and Economics from Balliol College of Oxford University, where she was a Rhodes Scholar.
 
Paul Donovan joined Boston Scientific in March 2000 and is our Senior Vice President, Corporate Communications. Prior to joining Boston Scientific, Mr. Donovan was the Executive Director of External Affairs at Georgetown University Medical Center, where he directed media, government and community relations as well as employee communications from 1998 to 2000. From 1997 to 1998, Mr. Donovan was Chief of Staff at the United States Department of Commerce. From 1993 to 1997, Mr. Donovan served as Chief of Staff to Senator Edward M. Kennedy and from 1989 to 1993 as Press Secretary to Senator Kennedy. Mr. Donovan is a director of the Massachusetts High Technology Council and Secretary of the Massachusetts Medical Device Industry Council. Mr. Donovan received a B.A. degree from Dartmouth College.
 
Joel L. Fleishman has been a Director of Boston Scientific since October 1992. He is also Professor of Law and Public Policy at Duke University where he has served in various administrative positions, including First Senior Vice President, since 1971. Mr. Fleishman is a founding member of the governing board of the Duke Center for Health Policy Research and Education and was the founding director from 1971 to 1983 of Duke University’s Terry Sanford Institute of Public Policy. He is the director of the Samuel and Ronnie Heyman Center for Ethics, Public Policy and the Professions and the director of the Duke University Philanthropic Research Program. From 1993 to 2001, Mr. Fleishman took a part-time leave from Duke University to serve as President of the Atlantic Philanthropic Service Company, the U.S. program staff of Atlantic Philanthropies. Mr. Fleishman also serves as a member of the Board of Trustees of The John and Mary Markle Foundation, Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Urban Institute, Chairman of The Visiting Committee of the Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, and as a director of Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation and the James River Insurance Group. Mr. Fleishman received A.B., M.A. and J.D. degrees from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and an LL.M. degree from Yale University.
 
Marye Anne Fox has been a Director of Boston Scientific since October 2001. Dr. Fox has also been Chancellor of the University of California, San Diego and Distinguished Professor of Chemistry since August 2004. Prior to that, she served as Chancellor of North Carolina State University and Distinguished University Professor of Chemistry from 1998 to 2004. From 1976 to 1998, she was a member of the faculty at the University of Texas, where she taught chemistry and held the Waggoner Regents Chair in Chemistry from 1991 to 1998. She served as the University’s Vice President for Research from 1994 to 1998. Dr. Fox is the Co-Chair of the National Academy of Sciences’ Government-University-Industry Research Roundtable and serves on President Bush’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. She has served as the Vice Chair of the National Science Board. She also serves on the boards of a number of other scientific, technological and civic organizations, and is a member of the boards of directors of Red Hat Corp., Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc., Burroughs-Wellcome Trust and the Camille and Henry Dreyfus Foundation. Dr. Fox also serves on the board of directors of W.R. Grace Co., a specialty chemical company that filed a petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Federal Bankruptcy Code in April 2001. She has been honored by a wide range of educational and professional organizations, and she has authored more than 350 publications, including five books. Dr. Fox holds a B.S. in Chemistry from Notre Dame College, an M.S. in Organic Chemistry from Cleveland State University, and a Ph.D. in Organic Chemistry from Dartmouth College.
 
James Gilbert joined Boston Scientific in 2004 and is our Group President, Cardiovascular and oversees our Cardiovascular Group, which includes our Peripheral Interventions, Vascular Surgery, Neurovascular, Electrophysiology and Cardiac Surgery businesses. Mr. Gilbert also oversees our Marketing Science, E-Marketing, and Health Economics and Reimbursement functions. Previously, he was a Senior Vice President and prior to that worked on a contractor basis as our Assistant to the President from January 2004 to December 2004. Prior to joining Boston Scientific, Mr. Gilbert spent 23 years with Bain & Company, where he served as a partner and director and was the managing partner of Bain’s Global Healthcare Practice. Mr. Gilbert received his B.S. degree in industrial engineering and operations research from Cornell University and his M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.
 
Jeffrey H. Goodman is our Executive Vice President, International. Previously, he was our Senior Vice President, International and prior to that, Mr. Goodman was our President, Intercontinental from 1999 to December 2004. Prior to joining Boston Scientific, Mr. Goodman held a variety of positions over 25 years with Baxter International, including General Manager of Sales, Area Manager Director and President of Biotech North America. Mr. Goodman is on the board of directors of Lionbridge Technologies, Inc. Mr. Goodman received his B.S. in Accounting from Gymea College, Sydney, Australia.
 
Ray J. Groves has been a Director of Boston Scientific since 1999. From 2001 to 2005 he served in various roles at Marsh Inc., including President, Chairman and Senior Advisor, and is a former member of the board of directors of its parent company, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. He served as Chairman of Legg Mason Merchant Banking, Inc. from 1995 to 2001. Mr. Groves served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Ernst & Young for 17 years until his retirement in 1994. Mr. Groves currently serves as a member of the boards of directors of Electronic Data Systems Corporation, Overstock.com and the Colorado Physicians Insurance Company.
 
Mr. Groves is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. He is a former member of the Board of Governors of the American Stock Exchange and the National Association of Securities Dealers. Mr. Groves is former Chairman of the board of directors of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. He is a member and former Chair of the board of directors of The Ohio State University Foundation and a member of the Dean’s Advisory Council of the Fisher College of Business. He is a former member of the Board of Overseers of The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and served as the Chairman of its Center for the Study of the Service Sector. Mr. Groves is a managing director of the Metropolitan Opera Association and a division of the Collegiate Chorale. Mr. Groves received a B.S. degree from The Ohio State University.
 
Kristina M. Johnson has been a Director of Boston Scientific since our acquisition of Guidant in April 2006. Dr. Johnson is the Dean of the Pratt School of Engineering at Duke University, a position she has held since 1999. Previously, she served as a professor in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of Colorado and director of the National Science Foundation Engineering Research Center for Optoelectronics Computing Systems at the University of Colorado, Boulder.  Dr. Johnson is a co-founder of the Colorado Advanced Technology Institute Center of Excellence in Optoelectronics and serves as a director of Minerals Technologies, Inc., AES Corporation and Nortel Corporation. Dr. Johnson also serves on the board of directors of The International Society for Optical Engineering and Duke Children’s Classic to benefit Duke Children’s Hospital.  Dr. Johnson was a Fulbright Faculty Scholar in the Department of Electrical Engineering at the University of Edinburgh, Scotland, and a NATO Post-Doctoral Fellow at Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.  Dr. Johnson received B.S., M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from Stanford University. 
 
William H. Kucheman joined Boston Scientific in 1995 as a result of the merger between Boston Scientific and SCIMED Life Systems, Inc. and is our Senior Vice President and Group President of the Interventional Cardiology Group. Previously, Mr. Kucheman served as our Senior Vice President of Marketing. Prior to joining Boston Scientific, he held a variety of management positions in sales and marketing for SCIMED Life Systems, Inc., Charter Medical Corporation, and Control Data Corporation. He began his career at the United States Air Force Academy Hospital and later was Healthcare Planner, Office of the Surgeon General, for the United States Air Force Medical Service. Mr. Kucheman has served on several industry boards including the board of directors of the Global Health Exchange, the Committee on Payment and Policy, and AdvaMed. He has also served on the Board of Advisors to MillenniumDoctor.com and the Board of Advisors to the College of Business, Center for Services Marketing and Management, Arizona State University. Mr. Kucheman earned a B.S. and a M.B.A. from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.  
 
Paul A. LaViolette joined Boston Scientific in January 1994 and is our Chief Operating Officer. Previously, Mr. LaViolette was President, Boston Scientific International, and Vice President-International from January 1994 to February 1995. In February 1995, Mr. LaViolette was elected to the position of Senior Vice President and Group President-Nonvascular Businesses. In October 1998, Mr. LaViolette was appointed President, Boston Scientific International, and in February 2000 assumed responsibility for the Boston Scientific’s Scimed, EPT and Target businesses as Senior Vice President and Group President, Cardiovascular. In March 2001, he also assumed the position of President, Scimed. Prior to joining Boston Scientific, he was employed by C.R.
 
Bard, Inc. in various capacities, including President, U.S.C.I. Division, from July 1993 to November 1993, President, U.S.C.I. Angioplasty Division, from January 1993 to July 1993, Vice President and General Manager, U.S.C.I. Angioplasty Division, from August 1991 to January 1993, and Vice President U.S.C.I. Division, from January 1990 to August 1991. Mr. LaViolette received his B.A. degree from Fairfield University and an M.B.A. degree from Boston College.
 
Ernest Mario has been a Director of Boston Scientific since October 2001. He is currently the Chairman of Reliant Pharmaceuticals and also served as its Chief Executive Officer until January 2007. Prior to joining Reliant Pharmaceuticals in April 2003, he was the Chairman of IntraBiotics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from April 2002 to April 2003. Dr. Mario also served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Apothogen, Inc., a pharmaceutical company, from January 2002 to April 2002 when Apothogen was acquired by IntraBiotics. Dr. Mario served as the Chief Executive of Glaxo Holdings plc from 1989 until March 1993 and as Deputy Chairman and Chief Executive from January 1992 until March 1993. From 1993 to 1997, Dr. Mario served as Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ALZA Corporation, a research-based pharmaceutical company with leading drug-delivery technologies, and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from 1997 to 2001. Dr. Mario presently serves on the boards of directors of Maxygen, Inc., Alexza Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. He is also a Trustee of Duke University and Chairman of the Board of the Duke University Health System. He is a past Chairman of the American Foundation for Pharmaceutical Education and serves as an advisor to the pharmacy schools at the University of Maryland, the University of Rhode Island and The Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy at Rutgers University. Dr. Mario holds a B.S. in Pharmacy from Rutgers, and an M.S. and a Ph.D. in Physical Sciences from the University of Rhode Island.
 
William F. McConnell, Jr. joined Boston Scientific in April 2006 following our acquisition of Guidant and is our Senior Vice President, Administration, CRM. Prior to joining Boston Scientific, Mr. McConnell was Vice President and Chief Information Officer for Guidant Corporation, which he joined in 1998. Previously, he was Managing Partner — Business Consulting in the Indianapolis office of Arthur Andersen LLP. Mr. McConnell serves as a board member of the Global Healthcare Exchange, Vesalius Ventures, and Board of Governors of the National American Red Cross. He is the Chairman of the Board of Trustees for the Trustee Leadership Development and Honorary Trustee of the Children’s Museum of Indianapolis. He is also a board member of the Information Technology Committee of Community Hospitals of Indianapolis, Inc., the Indiana University Information Technology Advancement Council, and ex officio member of the Board of Directors for the American Red Cross of Greater Indianapolis. Mr. McConnell received a B.S. degree from Miami University in Oxford, Ohio and is a Certified Public Accountant.
 
Stephen F. Moreci has been our Senior Vice President and Group President, Endosurgery since December 2000. Mr. Moreci joined Boston Scientific in 1989 as Vice President and General Manager for our Cardiac Assist business. In 1991, he was appointed Vice President and General Manager for our Endoscopy business. In 1994, Mr. Moreci was promoted to Group Vice President for our Urology and Gynecology businesses. In 1997, he assumed the role of President of our Endoscopy business. In 1999, he was named President of our Vascular business, which included peripheral interventions, vascular surgery and oncology. In 2001, he assumed the role of Group President, Endosurgery, responsible for our Urology/Gynecology, Oncology,
 
Endoscopy and Endovations businesses. Prior to joining Boston Scientific, Mr. Moreci had a 13-year career in medical devices, including nine years with Johnson & Johnson and four years with DermaCare. Mr. Moreci received a B.S. degree from Pennsylvania State University.
 
N.J. Nicholas, Jr. has been a Director of Boston Scientific since October 1994 and is a private investor. Previously, he served as President of Time, Inc. from September 1986 to May 1990 and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Time Warner, Inc. from May 1990 until February 1992. Mr. Nicholas is a director of Xerox Corporation and Time Warner Cable, Inc. He has served as a director of Turner Broadcasting and a member of the President’s Advisory Committee for Trade Policy and Negotiations and the President’s Commission on Environmental Quality. Mr. Nicholas is Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Environmental Defense and a member of the Council of Foreign Relations. Mr. Nicholas received an A.B. degree from Princeton University and an M.B.A. degree from Harvard Business School. He is also the brother of Pete M. Nicholas, Chairman of the Board.
 
Peter M. Nicholas, a co-founder of Boston Scientific, has been Chairman of the Board since 1995. He has been a Director since 1979 and served as our Chief Executive Officer from 1979 to March 1999 and Co-Chairman of the Board from 1979 to 1995. Prior to joining Boston Scientific, he was corporate director of marketing and general manager of the Medical Products Division at Millipore Corporation, a medical device company, and served in various sales, marketing and general management positions at Eli Lilly and Company. He is currently Chairman Emeritus of the Board of Trustees of Duke University. Mr. Nicholas is also a Fellow of the National Academy of Arts and Sciences and a member of the Trust for that organization. He has also served on several for profit and not-for-profit boards. Mr. Nicholas is also a member of the Massachusetts Business Roundtable, Massachusetts Business High Technology Council, CEOs for Fundamental Change in Education and the Boys and Girls Club of Boston. After college, Mr. Nicholas served as an officer in the U.S. Navy, resigning his commission as lieutenant in 1966. Mr. Nicholas received a B.A. degree from Duke University, and an M.B.A. degree from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. He is also the brother of N.J. Nicholas, Jr., one of our directors.
 
John E. Pepper has been a Director of Boston Scientific since 2003 and he previously served as a director of Boston Scientific from November 1999 to May 2001. Mr. Pepper is the Chief Executive Officer and director of the National Underground Railroad Freedom Center. Previously he served as Vice President for Finance and Administration of Yale University from January 2004 to December 2005. Prior to that, he served as Chairman of the executive committee of the board of directors of The Procter & Gamble Company until December 2003. Since 1963, he has served in various positions at Procter & Gamble, including Chairman of the Board from 2000 to 2002, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman from 1995 to 1999, President from 1986 to 1995 and director since 1984. Mr. Pepper is chairman of the board of directors of The Walt Disney Company, and is a member of the executive committee of the Cincinnati Youth Collaborative. Mr. Pepper graduated from Yale University in 1960 and holds honorary doctoral degrees from Yale University, The Ohio State University, Xavier University, Mount St. Joseph College and St. Petersburg University (Russia).
 
Kenneth J. Pucel is our Executive Vice President of Operations. Previously, he was our Senior Vice President, Operations and prior to that, Mr. Pucel was our Vice President and General Manager, Operations from September 2002 to December 2004
 
and our Vice President of Operations from June 2001 to September 2002 and before that he held various positions in our Cardiovascular Group, including Manufacturing Engineer, Process Development Engineer, Operations Manager, Production Manager and Director of Operations. Mr. Pucel received a Bachelor of Science Degree in Mechanical Engineering with a focus on Biomedical Engineering from the University of Minnesota.
 
Lucia L. Quinn joined Boston Scientific in January 2005 and is our Executive Vice-President—Human Resources. Prior to that, she was our Senior Vice President and Assistant to the President. Prior to joining Boston Scientific, Ms. Quinn was the Senior Vice President, Advanced Diagnostics and Business Development for Quest Diagnostics from 2001 to 2004. In this role, Ms. Quinn was responsible for developing multiple multi-million dollar businesses, including evaluating and developing strategic and operational direction. Prior to this, Ms. Quinn was Vice President, Corporate Strategic Marketing for Honeywell International from 1999 to 2001 and before that she held various positions with Digital Equipment Corporation from 1989 to 1998, including Corporate Vice President, Worldwide Brand Strategy & Management. She is also on the board of directors of QMed, Inc. Ms. Quinn received her B.A. in Management from Simmons College.
 
Uwe E. Reinhardt has been a Director of Boston Scientific since 2002. Dr. Reinhardt is the James Madison Professor of Political Economy and Professor of Economics and Public Affairs at Princeton University, where he has taught since 1968. Dr. Reinhardt is a senior associate of the University of Cambridge, England and serves as a Trustee of Duke University and the Duke University Health System, H&Q Healthcare Investors, H&Q Life Sciences Investors and Hambrecht & Quist Capital Management LLC. He is also the Commissioner of the Kaiser Family Foundation Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured and a member of the boards of directors of Amerigroup Corporation and Triad Hospital, Inc. Dr. Reinhardt is also a member of the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences. Dr. Reinhardt received a Bachelor of Commerce degree from the University of Saskatchewan, Canada and a Ph.D. in economics from Yale University.
 
Senator Warren B. Rudman has been a Director of Boston Scientific since October 1999. Senator Rudman has been Of Counsel to the international law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton, and Garrison LLP since January 2003. Previously, he was a partner of the firm since 1992. Prior to joining the firm, he served two terms as a U.S. Senator from New Hampshire from 1980 to 1992. He serves on the boards of directors of Collins & Aikman Corporation and several funds managed by the Dreyfus Corporation. He is the founding co-chairman of the Concord Coalition. Senator Rudman received a B.S. from Syracuse University and an LL.B. from Boston College Law School and served in the U.S. Army during the Korean War.
 
Paul W. Sandman joined Boston Scientific in May 1993 and since December 2004, has been our Executive Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel. Previously, Mr. Sandman served as our Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel. From March 1992 through April 1993, he was Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Wang Laboratories, Inc., where he was responsible for legal affairs. From 1984 to 1992, Mr. Sandman was Vice President and Corporate Counsel of Wang Laboratories, Inc., where he was responsible for corporate and international legal affairs. Mr. Sandman received his A.B. from Boston College and his J.D. from Harvard Law School.
 
James R. Tobin is our President and Chief Executive Officer and also serves as a Director. Prior to joining Boston Scientific in March 1999, Mr. Tobin served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Biogen, Inc. from 1997 to 1998 and Chief Operating Officer of Biogen from 1994 to 1997. From 1972 to 1994, Mr. Tobin served in a variety of executive positions with Baxter International, including President and Chief Operating Officer from 1992 to 1994. Previously, he served at Baxter as Managing Director in Japan, Managing Director in Spain, President of Baxter’s I.V. Systems Group and Executive Vice President. Mr. Tobin currently serves on the boards of directors of Curis, Inc. and Applera Corporation. Mr. Tobin holds an A.B. from Harvard College and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School. Mr. Tobin also served in the U.S. Navy from 1968 to 1972 where he achieved the rank of lieutenant.
 
 
The information required by this Item and set forth in our Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC on or about March 21, 2007, is incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K by reference.
 
 
The information required by this Item and set forth in our Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC on or about March 21, 2007, is incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K by reference.
 
 
The information required by this Item and set forth in our Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC on or about March 21, 2007, is incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K by reference.
 
 
The information required by this Item and set forth in our Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC on or about March 21, 2007, is incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K by reference.
 
 
 
 
(a)(1)    Financial Statements.
 
The response to this portion of Item 15 is set forth under Item 8 above.
 
(a)(2)    Financial Schedules.
 
The response to this portion of Item 15 (Schedule II) follows the signature page to this report. All other financial statement schedules are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and therefore have been omitted.
 
(a)(3)    Exhibits (* documents filed with this report)
 
EXHIBIT
NO.
 
TITLE
 
 
 
       
2.1
 
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 25, 2006, among Boston Scientific Corporation, Galaxy Merger Sub, Inc. and Guidant Corporation (Exhibit 2.1, Current Report on Form 8-K, dated January 25,2006, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
3.1
 
 
Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as amended (Exhibit 3.1, Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993, Exhibit 3.2, Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, Exhibit 3.3, Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, and Exhibit 3.4, Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
3.2
 
Restated By-laws of the Company (Exhibit 3.2, Registration No. 33-46980).
 
       
3.4
 
Certificate of Amendment of the Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation (Exhibit 3.1, Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
4.1
 
Specimen Certificate for shares of the Company s Common Stock (Exhibit 4.1, Registration No. 33-46980).
 
       
4.2
 
Description of Capital Stock contained in Exhibits 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3.
 
       
4.3
 
Indenture dated as of June 25, 2004 between the Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank (formerly The Chase Manhattan Bank) (Exhibit 4.1, Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 25, 2004, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
4.4
 
Indenture dated as of November 18, 2004 between the Company and J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association, as Trustee (Exhibit 4.1, Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 18, 2004, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
4.5
 
Form of First Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 21, 2006 (Exhibit 99.4, Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 21, 2006, File No. 1-11083).
 
 
       
4.6
 
Form of Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 21, 2006 (Exhibit 99.6, Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 21, 2006, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
4.7
 
5.45% Note due June 15, 2014 in the aggregate principal amount of $500,000,000 (Exhibit 4.2, Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 25, 2004, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
4.8
 
5.45% Note due June 15, 2014 in the aggregate principal amount of $100,000,000 (Exhibit 4.3, Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 25, 2004, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
4.9
 
Form of Global Security for the 5.125% Notes due 2017 (Exhibit 4.3, Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 18, 2004, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
4.10
 
Form of Global Security for the 4.250% Notes due 2011 (Exhibit 4.2, Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 18, 2004, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
4.11
 
Form of Global Security for the 5.50% Notes due 2015, and form of Notice to the holders thereof (Exhibit 4.1, Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 17, 2005 and Exhibit 99.5, Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 21, 2006, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
4.12
 
Form of Global Security for the 6.25% Notes due 2035, and form of Notice to holders thereof (Exhibit 4.2, Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 17, 2005 and Exhibit 99.7, Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 21, 2006, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
4.13
 
Indenture dated as of June 1, 2006 between the Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Trustee (Exhibit 4.1, Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 9, 2006, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
4.14
 
Form of Global Security for the 6.00% Notes due 2011 (Exhibit 4.2, Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 9, 2006, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
4.15
 
Form of Global Security for the 6.40% Notes due 2016 (Exhibit 4.3, Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 9, 2006, File No. 1-11083).
 
 
       
10.1
 
 
Form of Credit and Security Agreement dated as of August 16, 2002 among Boston Scientific Funding Corporation, the Company, Blue Ridge Asset Funding Corporation, Victory Receivables Corporation The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi Ltd., New York Branch and Wachovia Bank, N.A., as amended (Exhibit 10.1, Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, Exhibit 10.1, Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for quarter ended March 31, 2003, Exhibit 10.01, Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for quarter ended September 30, 2003, Exhibit 10.1, Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, Exhibit 10.1, Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, and Exhibit 10.1, Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, Exhibit 10.1, Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 12, 2005, Exhibit 10.7, Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 20, 2006, Exhibit 10.1, Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for quarter ended June 30, 2006, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
*10.2
 
Form of Omnibus Amendment dated as of December 21, 2006 among the Company, Boston Scientific Funding Corporation, Variable Funding Capital Company LLC, Victory Receivables Corporation and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., New York Branch  (Amendment No. 1 to Receivable Sale Agreement and Amendment No. 9 to Credit and Security Agreement).
 
       
10.3
 
Form of Receivables Sale Agreement dated as of August 16, 2002 between the Company and each of its Direct or Indirect Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries that Hereafter Becomes a Seller Hereunder, as the Sellers, and Boston Scientific Funding Corporation, as the Buyer (Exhibit 10.2, Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
10.4
 
 
Form of Credit Agreement dated as of April 21, 2006 among the Company, BSC International Holding Limited, Merrill Lynch Capital Corporation, Bear Stearns Corporate Lending Inc., Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Wachovia Bank, National Association, Bank of America, N.A., Banc of America Securities LLC, Merrill Lynch & Co. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (Exhibit 99.1, Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 21, 2006, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
10.5
 
License Agreement among Angiotech Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cook Incorporated and the Company dated July 9, 1997, and related Agreement dated December 13, 1999 (Exhibit 10.6, Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
10.6
 
Amendment between Angiotech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and the Company dated November 23, 2004 modifying July 9, 1997 License Agreement among Angiotech Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cook Incorporated and the Company (Exhibit 10.1, Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 23, 2004, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
10.7
 
Form of Offer Letter between Boston Scientific and Donald S. Baim, M.D. (Exhibit 10.1, Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 27, 2006, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
10.8
 
Form of Stock Option Agreement dated as of July 25, 2006 between Boston Scientific and Donald S. Baim, M.D. (Exhibit 10.2, Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 27, 2006, File No. 1-11083).
 
 
       
10.9
 
Form of Deferred Stock Unit Agreement dated as of July 25, 2006 between Boston Scientific and Donald S. Baim, M.D. (Exhibit 10.3, Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 27, 200, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
10.10
 
Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and certain Directors and Officers (Exhibit 10.16, Registration No. 33-46980).
 
       
10.11
 
Form of Retention Agreement between the Company and certain Executive Officers, as amended (Exhibit 10.1, Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 20, 2007, File No. 1-11083 ).
 
     
10.12
 
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (vesting over three years) (Exhibit 10.1, Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 10, 2004, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
10.13
 
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (vesting over four years) (Exhibit 10.2, Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 10, 2004, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
10.14
 
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Exhibit 10.3, Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 10, 2004, File 1-11083).
 
       
10.15
 
Form of Deferred Stock Unit Award Agreement (Exhibit 10.4, Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 10, 2004, File 1-11083).
 
       
*10.16
 
Form of Deferred Stock Unit Award Agreement (vesting over four years).
 
       
10.17
 
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (Non-employee Directors) (Exhibit 10.5, Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 10, 2004, File 1-11083).
 
       
10.18
 
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement (Non-Employee Directors) (Exhibit 10.6, Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 10, 2004,File 1-11083).
 
       
10.19
 
Form of Deferred Stock Unit Award Agreement (Non-Employee Directors) (Exhibit 10.7, Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 10, 2004, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
 
       
10.20
 
 
Boston Scientific Corporation 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan, as Amended and Restated, Effective January 1, 2001, and amended (Exhibit 10, 12, Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, Exhibit 10.12, Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, Exhibit 10.1, Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 24, 2004 and Exhibit 10.52, Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2005, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
*10.21
 
Form of Fifth Amendment to Boston Scientific Corporation 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan, effective as of January 1, 2006.
 
       
10.22
 
 
Boston Scientific Corporation Global Employee Stock Ownership Plan, as Amended and Restated (Exhibit 10.18, Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, Exhibit 10.21, Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, Exhibit 10.22, Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000 and Exhibit 10.14, Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
*10.23
 
Boston Scientific Corporation 2006 Global Employee Stock Ownership Plan.
 
       
*10.24
 
First Amendment of the Boston Scientific Corporation 2006 Global Employee Stock Ownership Plan.
 
       
10.25
 
Boston Scientific Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan, Effective January 1, 1996 (Exhibit 10.17, Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
10.26
 
 
Boston Scientific Corporation 1992 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan, as amended (Exhibit 10.2, Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996, Exhibit 10.3, Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000 and Exhibit 10.1, Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 31, 2004, File No.1-11083).
 
       
10.27
 
 
Boston Scientific Corporation 2003 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended (Exhibit 10.17, Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 and Exhibit 10.3, Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 9, 2005, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
10.28
 
 
Boston Scientific Corporation 2000 Long Term Incentive Plan, as amended (Exhibit 10.20, Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999, Exhibit 10.18, Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, Exhibit 10.1, Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 22, 2004 and Exhibit 10.3, Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 9, 2005, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
10.29
 
Boston Scientific Corporation 1995 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended (Exhibit 10.1, Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
 
       
 
       
    ended December 31, 1996, Exhibit 10.5, Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, Exhibit 10.1, Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 22, 2004 and Exhibit 10.3, Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 9, 2005, File No. 1-11083).   
       
10.30
 
Boston Scientific Corporation 1992 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended (Exhibit 10.1, Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996, Exhibit 10.2, Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, Exhibit 10.1, Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 22, 2004 and Exhibit 10.3, Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 9, 2005, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
10.31
 
Form of Deferred Stock Unit Agreement between Lucia L. Quinn and Boston Scientific Corporation dated May 31, 2005 (Exhibit 10.1, Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 31, 2005, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
10.32
 
Form of Boston Scientific Corporation Excess Benefit Plan (Exhibit 10.1, Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 29, 2005, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
10.33
 
Form of Trust Under the Boston Scientific Corporation Excess Benefit Plan (Exhibit 10.2, Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 29, 2005, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
10.34
 
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement dated July 1, 2005 (Exhibit 10.1, Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 1, 2005, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
10.35
 
Form of Deferred Stock Unit Award Agreement dated July 1, 2005 (Exhibit 10.2, Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 1, 2005, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
10.36
 
Form of 2006 Performance Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.1, Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 30, 2006, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
10.37
 
Form of 2007 Performance Incentive Plan, as amended (Exhibit 10.2, Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 20, 2007, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
10.38
 
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (Executive) (Exhibit 10.1, Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 12, 2006, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
10.39
 
Form of Deferred Stock Unit Award Agreement (Executive) (Exhibit 10.2, Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 12, 2006, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
10.40
 
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (Special) (Exhibit 10.3, Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 12, 2006, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
10.41
 
Form of Deferred Stock Unit Award Agreement (Special) (Exhibit 10.4, Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 12, 2006, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
 
       
10.42
 
Target Therapeutics, Inc. 1988 Stock Option Plan, as amended (Exhibit 10.2, Quarterly Report of Target Therapeutics, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1996, File No. 0-19801 and Exhibit 10.1, Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 31, 2004, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
10.43
 
Embolic Protection Incorporated 1999 Stock Plan, as amended (Exhibit 10.1, Registration Statement on Form S-8, Registration No. 333-61060 and Exhibit 10.1, Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 31, 2004, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
10.44
 
Quanam Medical Corporation 1996 Stock Plan, as amended (Exhibit 10.3, Registration Statement on Form S-8, Registration No. 333-61060 and Exhibit 10.1, Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 31, 2004, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
10.45
 
RadioTherapeutics Corporation 1994 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (Exhibit 10.1, Registration Statement on Form S-8, Registration No. 333-76380 and Exhibit 10.1, Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 31, 2004, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
*10.46
 
Guidant Corporation 1994 Stock Plan, as amended.
 
       
*10.47
 
Guidant Corporation 1996 Nonemployee Director Stock Plan, as amended.
 
       
*10.48
 
Guidant Corporation 1998 Stock Plan, as amended.
 
       
*10.49
 
Form of Guidant Corporation Option Grant.
 
       
*10.50
 
Form of Guidant Corporation Restricted Stock Grant.
 
       
*10.51
 
The Guidant Corporation Employee Savings and Stock Ownership Plan.
 
       
*10.52
 
First Amendment of the Guidant Corporation Employee Savings and Stock Ownership Plan.
 
       
*10.53
 
Second Amendment of the Guidant Corporation Employee Savings and Stock Ownership Plan.
 
       
*10.54
 
Third Amendment of the Guidant Corporation Employee Savings and Stock Ownership Plan.
 
       
 
       
*10.55
 
Fourth Amendment of the Guidant Corporation Employee Savings and Stock Ownership Plan.
 
       
*10.56
 
Fifth Amendment of the Guidant Corporation Employee Savings and Stock Ownership Plan.
 
       
10.57
 
Settlement Agreement effective September 21, 2005 among Medinol Ltd., Jacob Richter and Judith Richter and Boston Scientific Corporation, Boston Scientific Limited and Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. (Exhibit 10.1, Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 21, 2005, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
10.58
 
Transaction Agreement, dated as of January 8, 2006, as amended, between Boston Scientific Corporation and Abbott Laboratories (Exhibit 10.47, Exhibit 10.48, Exhibit 10.49 and Exhibit 10.50, Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2005, Exhibit 10.1, Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 7, 2006, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
10.59
 
Purchase Agreement between Guidant Corporation and Abbott Laboratories dated April 21, 2006, as amended (Exhibit 10.2 and Exhibit 10.3, Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, File No. 1-11083)
 
       
10.60
 
Promissory Note between BSC International Holding Limited (“Borrower”) and Abbott Laboratories (“Lender”) dated April 21, 2006 (Exhibit 10.4, Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, File No. 1-11083)
 
       
10.61
 
 
Subscription and Stockholder Agreement between Boston Scientific Corporation and Abbott Laboratories dated April 21, 2006, as amended (Exhibit 10.5 and Exhibit 10.6, Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, File No. 1-11083)
 
       
10.62
 
 
Decision and Order of the Federal Trade Commission in the matter of Boston Scientific Corporation and Guidant Corporation finalized August 3, 2006 (Exhibit 10.5, Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, File No. 1-11083)
 
       
 
10.63
 
Boston Scientific Executive Allowance Plan (Exhibit 10.53, Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2005, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
10.64
 
Boston Scientific Executive Retirement Plan (Exhibit 10.54, Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2005, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
10.65
 
Form of Deferred Stock Unit Agreement between James R. Tobin and the Company dated February 28, 2006 (2003 Long-Term Incentive Plan) (Exhibit 10.56, Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2005, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
10.66
 
Form of Deferred Stock Unit Agreement between James R. Tobin and the Company dated February 28, 2006 (2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan) (Exhibit 10.57, Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2005, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
11
 
Statement regarding computation of per share earnings (included in Note M to the Company's 2006 consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006 included in Item 8).
 
       
*12
 
Statement regarding computation of ratios of earnings to fixed charges.
 
       
14
 
Code of Conduct (Exhibit 14, Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, File No. 1-11083).
 
       
*21
 
List of the Company s subsidiaries as of February 28, 2007.
 
       
*23
 
Consent of Independent Auditors, Ernst & Young, LLP.
 
       
*31.1
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
       
*31.2
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
       
*32.1
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
       
*32.2
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Boston Scientific Corporation duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
     
 
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dated: March 1, 2007
By:   /s/  LAWRENCE C. BEST
 
Lawrence C. Best
 
Chief Financial Officer
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of Boston Scientific Corporation and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Dated: March 1, 2007
 
 
 
      
/s/ JOHN E. ABELE
John E. Abele
Director, Founder

Dated: March 1, 2007
 
 
 
      
/s/ LAWRENCE C. BEST

Lawrence C. Best
Executive Vice President, Finance and
Administration and Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Financial
And Accounting Officer)

Dated: March 1, 2007
 
 
 
      
/s/ URSULA M. BURNS

Ursula M. Burns
Director




Dated: March 1, 2007
 
 
 
      
/s/ NANCY-ANN DePARLE

Nancy-Ann DeParle
Director


Dated: March 1, 2007
 
 
 
      
/s/ JOEL L. FLEISHMAN

Joel L. Fleishman
Director

Dated: March 1, 2007
 
 
 
      
/s/ MARYE ANNE FOX

Marye Anne Fox, Ph.D.
Director

Dated: March 1, 2007
 
 
 
      
/s/ RAY J. GROVES

Ray J. Groves
Director

Dated: March 1, 2007
 
 
 
      
/s/ KRISTINA M. JOHNSON

Kristina M. Johnson
Director


Dated: March 1, 2007
 
 
 
      
/s/ ERNEST MARIO

Ernest Mario, Ph.D.
Director
 
 
 




 
 
 
      
/s/ N.J. NICHOLAS, JR.

N.J. Nicholas, Jr.
Director

Dated: March 1, 2007
 
 
 
      
/s/ PETE M. NICHOLAS

Pete M. Nicholas
Director, Founder, Chairman of the Board

Dated: March 1, 2007
 
 
 
      
/s/ JOHN E. PEPPER

John E. Pepper
Director

Dated: March 1, 2007
 
 
 
      
/s/ UWE E. REINHARDT

Uwe E. Reinhardt, Ph.D.
Director

Dated: March 1, 2007
 
 
 
      
/s/ WARREN B. RUDMAN

Warren B. Rudman
Director

Dated: March 1, 2007
 
 
 
      
/s/ JAMES R. TOBIN

James R. Tobin
Director, President and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

 
 


 
SCHEDULE II
 
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(in millions)

Year Ended December 31,
 
Balance at
Beginning
of Year
 
Balance Assumed from Guidant
 
Charges to Costs and Expenses
 
Deductions to Allowances for Uncollectible Amounts (a)
 
Charges to Other Accounts (b)
 
Balance at
End of Year
 
                           
Allowances for uncollectible
                         
amounts and sales returns:
                         
2006
 
$
83
   
15
   
12
   
(7
)    
19
 
$
122
 
2005
 
$
80
         
9
   
(8
)    
2
 
$
83
 
2004
 
$
61
         
14
   
(4
)    
9
 
$
80
 
 
(a) Uncollectible accounts written off.

(b) Primarily charges for sales returns and allowances, net of actual sales returns.
 



154

 
EXHIBIT 10.2
OMNIBUS AMENDMENT
[Amendment No. 1 to Receivables Sale Agreement and
Amendment No. 9 to Credit and Security Agreement]


THIS OMNIBUS AMENDMENT (this “Amendment” ) is entered into as of December 21, 2006 by and among by and among Boston Scientific Funding Corporation, a Delaware corporation ( “BSFC” ) which on the date hereof will convert into a Delaware limited liability company known as Boston Scientific Funding LLC ( “BSF-LLC” ), Boston Scientific Corporation, a Delaware corporation ( “BSX” ), as a Seller and initial Servicer, Variable Funding Capital Company LLC, a Delaware limited liability company as assignee of Blue Ridge Asset Funding Corporation ( “VFCC” ), Victory Receivables Corporation, a Delaware corporation ( “Victory” ), The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., New York Branch (formerly known as The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd., New York Branch), individually as a Liquidity Bank and as Victory Agent and Wachovia Bank, National Association, individually as a Liquidity Bank, as VFCC Agent and as Administrative Agent, as amended from time to time and pertains to (i) that certain Receivables Sale Agreement, dated as of August 16, 2002, by and between BSX and BSFC (the “RSA” ) and (ii) that certain Credit and Security Agreement,   dated as of August 16, 2002, by and among the parties hereto , as amended from time to time (the “CSA” and, together with the RSA, the “Agreements” ). Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein are used with the meanings attributed thereto in the RSA or the CSA, as applicable.
 
W I T N E S S E T H :
 
WHEREAS, the parties wish to modify the Agreements as hereinafter set forth;
 
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual agreements herein contained, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:
 
1.       Amendment .
 
(a)       Effective as of the date hereof, all references in the Agreements to “Boston Scientific Funding Corporation” are hereby replaced with “Boston Scientific Funding LLC”, and all references to such Person’s existence as a Delaware corporation are hereby replaced with references to it as a Delaware limited liability company.
 
(b)       The Administrative Agent is hereby authorized to file amendments to all existing financing statements filed in connection with the Agreements to give effect to the foregoing amendment to BSCF’s identity and legal form, as well as a Delaware UCC-1 financing statement naming BSF-LLC, as debtor, and the Administrative Agent, as secured party.
 
2.       Condition Precedent to Effectiveness . The effectiveness of this Amendment is subject to the conditions precedent that the Agents shall have received counterparts hereof duly executed by each of the parties hereto.
 
3.       Scope of Amendment . Except as expressly amended hereby, each of the Agreements remains in full force and effect in accordance with its terms and this Amendment shall not by implication or otherwise alter, modify, amend or in any way affect any of the other
 

terms, conditions, obligations, covenants or agreements contained in either of the Agreements, all of which are ratified and affirmed in all respects and shall continue in full force and effect.
 
4.       Governing Law . This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.
 
5.       Counterparts . This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and each of such counterparts shall for all purposes be deemed an original, and all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument.
 
<Signature pages follow>


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be duly executed and delivered as of the date first above written.
 
 
 
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC FUNDING CORPORATION
 

 

         
 

 

 

Name:
Title:
 
 
 

 
 
 
 

 

         
Name :
Title :
 

 
 
 
 
By:

Name:
Title:
 

 



 


 
 
 
VICTORY RECEIVABLES CORPORATION
 
 
By :

         
Name :
Title :
 

 
 
 
 
By:

Name:
Title:
 
 
THE BANK OF TOKYO -MITSUBISHI UFJ, LTD., NEW YORK BRANCH, as Victory Agent
 
 
By:

Name:
Title:
 
 
 

 
EXHIBIT 10.16
 





Boston Scientific Corporation

2003 Long-Term Incentive Plan

Deferred Stock Unit Award Agreement

February 13, 2007





Employee’s Name


 
 
 

 

 

 
 
 
 



BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION

INTENT TO GRANT

DEFERRED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT


This Agreement, dated as of the 13 th day of February, 2007 (the Grant Date ), is between Boston Scientific Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and the “Participant”, an employee of the Company or any of its affiliates or subsidiaries. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in the Company’s Long-Term Incentive Plan set forth on the Signature Page of this Agreement (the “Plan”).

1.       Grant and Acceptance of Award . The Company hereby indicates its intent to award to the Participant that number of Deferred Stock Units set forth on the Signature Page of this Agreement (the “Unit”), each Unit representing the Company’s commitment to issue to Participant one share of the Company’s common stock, par value $.01 per share (the “Stock”), subject to certain eligibility and other conditions set forth herein. The award is intended to be granted pursuant to and is subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the provisions of the Plan.

2.       Eligibility Conditions upon Award of Units . Participant hereby acknowledges the intent of the Company to award Units subject to certain eligibility and other conditions set forth herein.

3.       Satisfaction of Conditions . Except as otherwise provided in Section 5 hereof (relating to death of the Participant), Section 6 hereof (relating to Retirement or Disability of the Participant) and Section 8 hereof (relating to Change in Control of the Company), the Company intends to award shares of Stock hereunder subject to the eligibility conditions described in Section 7 hereof in approximately equal annual installments on each of five anniversaries of the date first set forth above, beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant. No shares of Stock shall otherwise be issued to Participant prior to the date on which the Units vest.

4.       Participant’s Rights in Stock . The shares of Stock if and when issued hereunder shall be registered in the name of the Participant and evidenced in the manner as the Company may determine. During the period prior to the issuance of Stock, the Participant will have no rights of a stockholder of the Company with respect to the Stock, including no right to receive dividends or vote the shares of Stock.

5.       Death . Upon the death of the Participant while employed by the Company and its affiliates or subsidiaries, the Company will issue to the Participant or beneficiary
 

of the Participant as set forth under the provisions of the Company’s program of life insurance for employees, any shares of Stock to Participant to be awarded hereunder that remain subject to eligibility conditions.

6.       Retirement or Disability . In the event of the Participant’s Retirement or Disability, the Company will issue to Participant any shares of Stock to be awarded hereunder that remain subject to eligibility conditions.

7.       Other Termination of Employment -- Eligibility Conditions . If the employment of the Participant with the Company and its affiliates or subsidiaries is terminated or Participant separates from the Company and its affiliates or subsidiaries for any reason other than death, Retirement or Disability, any Units that remain subject to eligibility conditions shall be void and no Stock shall be issued. Eligibility to be issued shares of Stock is conditioned on Participant’s continuous employment with the Company through and on the applicable anniversary of the date as set forth in Section 3 above.

8.       Change in Control of the Company . In the event of a Change in Control of the Company, the Company will issue to Participant any shares of Stock to be awarded hereunder that remain subject to eligibility conditions.

9.       Consideration for Stock . The shares of Stock are intended to be issued for no cash consideration.

10.       Delivery of Stock . The Company shall not be obligated to deliver any shares of Stock to be awarded hereunder until (i) all federal and state laws and regulations as the Company may deem applicable have been complied with; (ii) the shares have been listed or authorized for listing upon official notice to the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. or have otherwise been accorded trading privileges; and (iii) all other legal matters in connection with the issuance and delivery of the shares have been approved by the Company’s legal department.

11.       Tax Withholding . The Participant shall be responsible for the payment of any taxes of any kind required by any national or local law to be paid with respect to the Units or the shares of Stock to be awarded hereunder, including, without limitation, the payment of any applicable withholding, income, social and similar taxes or obligations. Except as otherwise provided in this Section, upon the issuance of Stock or the satisfaction of any eligibility condition   with respect to the Stock to be issued hereunder, the Company shall hold back from the total number of shares of Stock to be delivered to the Participant, and shall cause to be transferred to the Company, whole shares of Stock having a Fair Market Value on the date the shares are subject to issuance an amount as nearly as possible equal to (rounded to the next whole share) the Company’s withholding, income, social and similar tax   obligations with respect to the Stock. To the extent of the Fair Market Value of the withheld shares, Participant shall be deemed to have satisfied Participant’s responsibility under this Section 11 to pay these obligations. The Participant
 

shall satisfy Participant’s responsibility to pay any other withholding, income, social or similar tax obligations with respect to the Stock, and (subject to such rules as the Committee may prescribe) may satisfy Participant’s responsibility to pay the tax obligations described in the immediately preceding sentence, by so indicating to the Company in writing at least thirty (30) days prior to the date the shares of Stock are subject to issuance and paying the amount of these tax obligations in cash to the Company within ten (10) business days following the date the Units vest or by making other arrangements satisfactory to the Committee for payment of these obligations. In no event shall whole shares be withheld by or delivered to the Company in satisfaction of tax withholding requirements in excess of the maximum statutory tax withholding required by law. The Participant agrees to indemnify the Company against any and all liabilities, damages, costs and expenses that the Company may hereafter incur, suffer or be required to pay with respect to the payment or withholding of any taxes. The obligations of the Company under this Agreement and the Plan shall be conditional upon such payment or arrangements, and the Company shall, to the extent permitted by law, have the right to deduct any such taxes from any payment of any kind otherwise due to the Participant.
 
12.       Investment Intent . The Participant acknowledges that the acquisition of the Stock to be issued hereunder is for investment purposes without a view to distribution thereof.

13.       Limits on Transferability . Until the eligibility conditions of this award have been satisfied and shares of Stock have been issued in accordance with the terms of this Agreement or by action of the Committee, the Units awarded hereunder are not transferable and shall not be sold, transferred, assigned, pledged, gifted, hypothecated or otherwise disposed of or encumbered by the Participant. Transfers of shares of Stock by the Participant are subject to the Company’s Stock Trading Policy.

14.       Award Subject to the Plan . The award to be made pursuant to this Agreement is made subject to the Plan. The terms and provisions of the Plan as it may be amended from time to time are hereby incorporated herein by reference. In the event of a conflict between any term or provision contained in this Agreement and a term or provision of the Plan, the applicable terms and conditions of the Plan will govern and prevail. However, no amendment of the Plan after the date hereof may adversely alter or impair the issuance of the Stock to be made pursuant to this Agreement.

15.       No Rights to Continued Employment . The Company’s intent to grant the shares of Stock hereunder shall not confer upon the Participant any right to continued employment or other association with the Company or any of its affiliates or subsidiaries; and this Agreement shall not be construed in any way to limit the right of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates to terminate the employment or other association of the Participant with the Company or to change the terms of such employment or association at any time.


16.       Legal Notices . Any legal notice necessary under this Agreement shall be addressed to the Company in care of its General Counsel at the principle executive offices of the Company and to the Participant at the address appearing in the personnel records of the Company for such Participant or to either party at such other address as either party may designate in writing to the other. Any such notice shall be deemed effective upon receipt thereof by the addressee.

17.       Governing Law . The interpretation, performance and enforcement of this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of The Commonwealth of Massachusetts (without regard to the conflict of laws principles thereof) and applicable federal laws.

18.       Headings . The headings contained in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall not affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.

19.       Counterparts . This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and all of which together shall be deemed to the one and the same instrument.




[remainder of page intentionally left blank]



 


SIGNATURE PAGE

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company, by its duly authorized officer, and the Participant have executed and delivered this Agreement as a sealed instrument as of the date and year first above written.



PLAN: 2003 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

Number of Deferred Stock Units:

Issuance Schedule
20%     February 13, 2008
20%     February 13, 2009
20%     February 13, 2010
20%     February 13, 2011
20%     February 13, 2012




 
PARTICIPANT:


Signature _____________________________
<<Employee Name>>
 




 
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
 
 
 
James R. Tobin
President and Chief Executive Officer  



APPENDIX A

Nature of Grant . In accepting the grant, I acknowledge that:

(1)       the Plan is established voluntarily by the Corporation, is discretionary in nature and may be modified, amended, suspended or terminated by the Corporation at any time;

(2)       this Award is does not create any contractual or other right to receive future awards, or other benefits in lieu of an award, even if awards have been given repeatedly in the past, and all decisions with respect to future awards, if any, will be at the sole discretion of the Corporation;

(3)       this Award is not part of normal or expected compensation or salary for any purposes, including, but not limited to, calculating any severance, termination, bonuses, retirement benefits or similar payments;

(4)       the future value of the Stock is unknown and cannot be predicted with certainty; and

(5)       in consideration of the Award, no claim or entitlement to compensation or damages shall arise from termination of the Award resulting from termination of my employment by the Corporation (for any reason whatsoever and whether or not in breach of local labor laws) and I irrevocably release the Corporation from any such claim that may arise; if, notwithstanding the foregoing, any such claim is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to have arisen, then, by accepting this Award, I shall be deemed irrevocably to have waived my entitlement to pursue such claim.
 
Data Privacy .  I hereby explicitly and unambiguously consent to the collection, use and transfer, in electronic or other form, of my personal data as described herein by and among, as applicable, the Corporation and its subsidiaries and affiliates for the exclusive purpose of implementing, administering and managing my participation in the Plan.

I understand that the Corporation holds certain personal information about me, including, but not limited to, my name, home address and telephone number, date of birth, social insurance number or other identification number, salary, nationality, job title, any shares of stock or directorships held in the Corporation, details of all options or any other entitlement to shares of stock awarded, canceled, exercised, vested, unvested or outstanding in my favor, for the purpose of implementing, administering and managing the Plan (“Data”). I understand that Data may be transferred to any third parties assisting in the implementation, administration and management of the Plan, that these recipients may be located in my country or elsewhere, and that the recipient’s country may have different data privacy laws and protections than my country. I understand that I may request a list with the names and addresses of any potential recipients of the Data by contacting my local human resources representative. I authorize the recipients to receive, possess, use, retain and transfer the Data, in electronic or other form, for the purposes of implementing, administering and managing my participation in the Plan, including any requisite transfer of such Data as may be required to a broker or other third party with whom I may elect to deposit any shares of stock acquired upon exercise of the option. I understand that Data will be held only as long as is necessary to implement, administer and manage my participation in the Plan. I understand that I may, at any time, view Data, request additional information about the storage and processing of Data, require any necessary amendments to Data or refuse or withdraw the consents herein, in any case without cost, by contacting in writing my local human resources representative. I understand, however, that refusing or withdrawing my consent may affect my ability to participate in the Plan. For more information on the consequences of my refusal to consent or withdrawal of consent, I understand that I may contact my local human resources representative.

Electronic Delivery of Documents . The Corporation may, in its sole discretion, decide to deliver any documents related to the option granted under and participation in the Plan or future options that may be granted under the Plan by electronic means or to request my consent to participate in the Plan by electronic means. I hereby consent to receive such documents by electronic delivery and, if requested, to agree to participate in the Plan through an on-line or electronic system established and maintained by the Corporation or another third party designated by the Corporation.


 
 
EXHIBIT 10.21
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
401(k) RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN

FIFTH AMENDMENT

Pursuant to Section 10.1 of the Boston Scientific Corporation 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2001, and as further amended from time to time (the “Plan”), Boston Scientific Corporation hereby amends the Plan as follows:

1.    Effective January 1, 2007, a new subsection (e) is hereby added to Section 2.1, which subsection reads in its entirety as follows:
 
“(e)   Notwithstanding the foregoing, an Eligible Employee who first completes an Hour of Service with a Participating Employer on or after January 1, 2007 and who would become a Participant in accordance with subsection (b) but for the failure to enter into a compensation reduction authorization will become a Participant on the first Entry Date on which an automatic compensation reduction authorization is in effect with respect to such Eligible Employee pursuant to Section 3.2(b).”
 
2.    Effective January 1, 2007, Section 3.2 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
 
“3.2.   Form and Manner of Affirmative and Automatic Elections .
 
(a)   A "compensation reduction authorization" is an authorization from an Eligible Employee to a Participating Employer which satisfies the requirements of this Section 3.2. A compensation reduction authorization may be either an “affirmative compensation reduction authorization” or an “automatic compensation reduction authorization”. Each affirmative compensation reduction authorization shall be in a form prescribed or approved by the Committee, and may be entered into as of any Entry Date upon such prior notice as the Committee may prescribe. A compensation reduction authorization may be changed by the Participant, with such prior notice as the Committee may prescribe, as of the first day of any payroll period. A compensation reduction authorization shall be effective with respect to Compensation payable on and after the applicable Entry Date. A compensation reduction authorization may be revoked by the Participant at any time, upon such prior notice as the Committee may prescribe. A Participant who revokes a compensation reduction authorization may enter into a new affirmative compensation reduction authorization only as of a subsequent Entry Date.
 
(b)   An Eligible Employee who first completes an Hour of Service with a Participating Employer on or after January 1, 2007 will be deemed to enter into an “automatic compensation reduction authorization” pursuant to which his or her Compensation will be automatically reduced by the amount described in (c) below, beginning on the Entry Date determined by the Committee, and the amount of such reduction will be contributed to the Trust as a pre-tax Elective Contribution under Section 3.1, subject to the following terms and conditions:
 
(1)   An Eligible Employee whose Compensation has been automatically reduced under this Section 3.2(b) may elect at any time either to (i)
 
 
 

 
cancel such automatic compensation reduction authorization, thereby ceasing Elective Contributions to the Plan on his or her behalf, or (ii) replace such automatic compensation reduction authorization with an affirmative compensation reduction authorization, thereby changing the amount of Elective Contributions to the Plan on his or her behalf and/or converting such Elective Contributions to Roth elective deferrals made pursuant to Article 3A. Any election under this Section 3.2(b)(1) shall be in a form or manner prescribed or approved by the Committee and shall be effective with respect to Compensation payable on and after the date of such election, subject to such notice as the Committee may prescribe or require.
 
(2)       Prior to the Entry Date on which an automatic compensation reduction authorization takes effect with respect to an Eligible Employee, the Eligible Employee will receive a notice explaining his or her right to elect to terminate or change the amount of his or her Elective Contributions to the Plan and how such Elective Contributions will be invested in the absence of any investment election by the Eligible Employee. An Eligible Employee will have a reasonable period of time after receipt of such notice to cancel the automatic compensation reduction authorization or replace it with an affirmative compensation reduction authorization, and to make an affirmative investment election, before the automatic compensation reduction authorization takes effect. Such notice or a similar notice will be provided to such Eligible Employee within a reasonable period of time before each Plan Year thereafter for so long as an automatic compensation reduction authorization remains in effect with respect to such Eligible Employee under this Section 3.2(b).
 
(c)   The amount of the reduction in an Eligible Employee's Compensation under an automatic compensation reduction authorization pursuant to Section 3.2(b) shall be as follows:
 
First Plan Year in which the automatic compensation reduction authorization is in effect:
2% of Compensation
   
Second Plan Year in which the automatic compensation reduction authorization is in effect:
3% of Compensation
   
Third Plan Year in which the automatic compensation reduction authorization is in effect:
4% of Compensation
   
Fourth Plan Year in which the automatic compensation reduction authorization is in effect:
5% of Compensation
   
Fifth Plan Year and future Plan Years in which the automatic compensation reduction authorization is in effect:
6% of Compensation"
 
 
-2-

 
3.    Effective January 1, 2007, a new Article 3A is hereby added to the Plan immediately following Article 3, to read in its entirety as follows:
 
“ARTICLE 3A.   ROTH ELECTIVE DEFERRALS.
 
3A.1.   General Application .
 
(a)   As of January 1, 2007, the Plan will accept Roth elective deferrals made on behalf of Participants. A Participant’s Roth elective deferrals will be allocated to a separate account maintained for such deferrals as described in Section 3A.2.
 
(b)   Unless specifically stated otherwise, Roth elective deferrals will be treated as Elective Contributions for all purposes under the plan.
 
3A.2.   Separate Accounting .
 
(a)   Contributions and withdrawals of Roth elective deferrals will be credited and debited to the Roth elective deferral account maintained for each Participant.
 
(b)   The Plan will maintain a record of the amount of Roth elective deferrals in each Participant’s Account.
 
(c)   Gains, losses, and other credits or charges must be separately allocated on a reasonable and consistent basis to each Participant’s Roth elective deferral account and the Participant’s other Accounts under the Plan.
 
(d)   No contributions other than Roth elective deferrals and properly attributable earnings will be credited to each Participant’s Roth elective deferral account.
 
3A.3.   Direct Rollovers .
 
(a)   Notwithstanding Section 8.6, a direct rollover of a distribution from a Roth elective deferral account under the Plan will only be made to another Roth elective deferral account under an applicable retirement plan described in section 402A(e)(1) of the Code or to a Roth IRA described in section 408A of the Code, and only to the extent the rollover is permitted under the rules of section 402(c) of the Code.
 
(b)   Notwithstanding Section 3.6, the Plan will accept a Rollover Contribution to a Roth elective deferral account only if it is a direct rollover from another Roth elective deferral account under an applicable retirement plan described in section 402A(e)(1) of the Code and only to the extent the rollover is permitted under the rules of section 402(c) of the Code.
 
(c)   Eligible rollover distributions from a Participant’s Roth elective deferral account are taken into account in determining whether the total amount of the Participant’s account balances under the Plan exceeds $1,000 for purposes of mandatory distributions from the Plan.
 
 
-3-

 
3A.4.   Correction of Excess Contributions .
 
(a)   In the case of a distribution of excess contributions under Section 11.4, a Highly Compensated Employee may not designate the extent to which the excess amount is composed of pre-tax elective deferrals and Roth elective deferrals.
 
3A.5.   Definition.
 
(a)   Roth Elective Deferrals. A “Roth elective deferral” is an Elective Contribution that is:
 
(1)   Designated irrevocably by the Participant at the time of the compensation reduction authorization as a Roth elective deferral that is being made in lieu of all or a portion of the pre-tax Elective Contributions the Participant is otherwise eligible to make under the Plan; and
 
(2)   Treated by the Participating Employer as includible in the Participant’s taxable income at the time the Participant would have received that amount in cash if the Participant had not entered into a compensation reduction authorization.
 
(b)   Roth elective deferral account. A “Roth elective deferral account” means an Account to which a Participant’s Roth elective deferrals are allocated.”
 
4.    Effective January 1, 2007, a new Section 8.10 is hereby added to the Plan, which Section reads in its entirety as follows:
 
8.10.   Non-Spousal Rollovers . Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, an eligible rollover distribution (as defined in Section 8.6) to a Beneficiary who is not the surviving spouse of a Participant may be directed in a direct trustee-to-trustee transfer to an individual retirement account described in Code section 408(a) or an individual retirement annuity described in Code section 408(b) in accordance with Section 402(c)(11) of the Code.”
 
5.    Effective January 1, 2006, subsection (a) of Section 6.1 is hereby amended by changing the last sentence to read as follows: “Effective January 1, 2007, a Participant may request no more than one withdrawal under this Section 6.1 in any single Plan Year.”
 
6.    Effective January 1, 2007, subsection (b) of Section 11.3 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
 
“(b) Distribution of excess deferrals .  In the event that an amount is included in a Participant's gross income for a taxable year as a result of an excess deferral under Code section 402(g), and the Participant notifies the Committee on or before the March 1 following the taxable year that all or a specified part of an Elective Contribution made for his or her benefit represents an excess deferral, the Committee shall make every reasonable effort to cause such excess deferral, adjusted for allocable income, to be distributed to the Participant no later than the April 15 following the calendar year in which such excess deferral was made. The income allocable to excess deferrals is equal to the allocable gain or loss for the taxable year of the individual, plus, in the case of a
 
 
-4-

 
distribution in a taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 2007, the allocable gain or loss for the period between the end of the taxable year and the date of distribution (the "gap period"). For distributions in taxable years beginning prior to January 1, 2007, income allocable to excess deferrals for the taxable year shall be determined by multiplying the gain or loss attributable to the Participant's Elective Contribution Account for the taxable year by a fraction, the numerator of which is the Participant's excess deferrals for the taxable year, and the denominator of which is the sum of the Participant's Elective Contribution Account balance as of the beginning of the taxable year plus the Participant's Elective Contributions for the taxable year. For distributions in taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2007, income allocable to excess deferrals for the aggregate of the taxable year and the gap period shall be determined in accordance with the alternative method set forth in proposed Regulation section 1.402(g)-1(e)(5)(iii). No distribution of an excess deferral shall be made during the taxable year of a Participant in which the excess deferral was made unless the correcting distribution is made after the date on which the Plan received the excess deferral and both the Participant and the Plan designate the distribution as a distribution of an excess deferral. The amount of any excess deferrals that may be distributed to a Participant for a taxable year shall be reduced by the amount of Elective Contributions that were excess contributions and were previously distributed to the Participant for the Plan Year beginning with or within such taxable year.”
 
7.    Effective January 1, 2006, subsection (b)(iv) of Section 11.4 is hereby amended by deleting the reference to “Regulation section 1.401(k)-1(b)(5)” at the end thereof and inserting in its place the following: “Regulation section 1.401(k)-1(a)(6)”.
 
8.    Effective January 1, 2006, subsection (b)(vii) of Section 11.4 is hereby amended by deleting the reference to “Regulation sections 1.401(m)-1(b)(5)” at the end thereof and inserting in its place the following: “Regulation section 1.401(m)-2(a)(6)”.
 
9.    Effective January 1, 2006, subsection (g) of Section 11.4 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
 
“(g)   Distribution of excess contributions . A Participant's excess contributions, adjusted for income, will be designated by the Participating Employer as a distribution of excess contributions and distributed to the Participant. The income allocable to excess contributions is equal to the allocable gain or loss for the Plan Year, plus, for the Plan Years commencing on January 1, 2006 and January 1, 2007, the allocable gain or loss for the period between the end of the Plan Year and the date of distribution (the "gap period"). Income allocable to excess contributions for the Plan Year shall be determined by multiplying the gain or loss attributable to the Participant's Elective Contribution Account and QNEC Account balances by a fraction, the numerator of which is the excess contributions for the Participant for the Plan Year, and the denominator of which is the sum of the Participant's Elective Contribution Account and QNEC Account balances as of the beginning of the Plan Year plus the Participant's Elective Contributions and Qualified Nonelective Contributions for the Plan Year. Income allocable to excess contributions for the gap period (for the 2006 and 2007 Plan Years) shall be determined in accordance with the safe harbor method set forth in Regulation section 1.401(k)-2(b)(2)(iv)(D). Distribution of excess contributions will be made after the close of the Plan Year to which the contributions relate, but within 12 months after the close of such Plan Year. Excess
 
 
-5-

 
contributions shall be treated as annual additions under the Plan, even if distributed under this paragraph.”
 
10.    Effective January 1, 2006, subsection (b)(iv) of Section 11.5 is hereby amended by deleting the reference to “Regulation section 1.401(m)-1(b)(5)” at the end thereof and inserting in its place the following: “Regulation section 1.401(m)-2(a)(6)”.
 
11.    Effective January 1, 2007, Section 14.13 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
 
14.13.       Elective Contribution Account”
 
12.    means an Account to which Elective Contributions (but not Roth elective deferrals) are allocated.”
 
13.    Effective January 1, 2006, Section 14.31 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
 
14.31.     “Qualified Nonelective Contribution means a contribution made in the discretion of the Plan Sponsor which is designated by the Plan Sponsor as a Qualified Nonelective Contribution and which falls within the definition of a “qualified nonelective contribution” under Regulation section 1.401(k)-6”.
 

 
* * * * *
 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Boston Scientific Corporation has caused this amendment to be executed in its name and on its behalf effective as of the dates set forth herein by an officer or a duly authorized delegate.


 
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION



By:   ___________________________


Title:   ___________________________


Date:   ___________________________
 
 
 
 
-6-

 
 
EXHIBIT 10.23
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
 
2006 GLOBAL EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN
 
(U.S. PLAN DOCUMENT)
 
1.     Purpose . The purpose of the Boston Scientific Corporation 2006 Global Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the “Plan”) is to encourage ownership of common stock by employees of Boston Scientific Corporation and its Related Corporations and to provide additional incentives for such employees to promote the success of the business of the Company and its Related Corporations. The Plan is intended to be an “employee stock purchase plan” within the meaning of Section 423(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
 
2.     Definitions . As used in this Plan, the following terms shall have the meanings set forth below:
 
(a)    “Beneficiary” means the person designated as beneficiary in the Optionee’s Enrollment Agreement or, if no such beneficiary is named or no such Enrollment Agreement is in effect at the Optionee’s death, his or her beneficiary as determined under the provisions of the Company’s program of life insurance for employees.
 
(b)   “Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.
 
(c)    “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or any statute successor thereto, and any regulations issued from time to time thereunder.
 
(d)   “Committee” means a committee of the Board appointed to administer the Plan in accordance with Section 4, consisting of not less than two directors of the Company who are not employees of the Company or any Related Corporation, each appointed by the Board from time to time to serve at its pleasure for the purpose of carrying out the responsibilities of the Committee under the Plan, and such officers or employees of the Company or a Participating Employee designated by the Committee to administer the operation of the Plan. For any period during which no Committee is in existence, all authority and responsibility assigned the Committee under this Plan shall be exercised, if at all, by the Board.
 
(e)    “Company” means Boston Scientific Corporation, a Delaware corporation (or any successor corporation).
 
(f)    “Compensation” means the total salary or wages or other taxable compensation (such as bonus payments, commissions, short-term disability payments and wage or salary substitution payments) paid by a Participating Employer to the Optionee during active employment (including approved paid leaves of absences) as of a particular pay date, exclusive of expense reimbursement, relocation allowances, tuition reimbursement, adoption assistance benefits, earnings related to stock options or other equity incentives, and post-employment payments that may be computed from eligible compensation, such as severance benefits, salary continuation after termination of Service, redundancy pay, or termination indemnities.
 
(g)    “Effective Date” means the first business day that the Employees of a Participating Employer may participate in the Plan, as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.
 
(h)   “Eligible Employee” means an Employee who is eligible under the provisions of Section 7 to be granted an Option as of the first day of an Offering Period.
 
(i)    “Employee” means an individual who is regularly scheduled to perform services for a Participating Employer for a continuous, indefinite period of time.
 
(j)     “Entry Date” means, with respect to an Eligible Employee working for a Participating Employer, (1) the Effective Date for that Employee, (2) following the Effective Date, the first business day of each first and third calendar quarter of a calendar year, or (3) such other date as the Committee may determine. For an Eligible Employee of any affiliate of the Company who transfers to the permanent employment of a Participating Employer, the “Entry Date” means the start of the first practicable business day following the transfer, as determined by the Committee, in accordance with the policies and procedures of the Participating Employer.
 
 
 

 
(k)   “Fair Market Value” means, with respect to Stock on a given date, the closing price of the Stock as reported in The Wall Street Journal for such date.
 
(l)    “Investment Date” means, with respect to an Offering Period, (1) the next following business day after the Offering Termination Date, (2) the last business day of the next following calendar month, if Stock is in fact purchased on the New York Stock Exchange, or (3) such other date designated by the Committee.
 
(m)  “Enrollment Agreement” means an agreement described in Section 8.2, in such form as may be approved by the Committee from time to time, whereby an Optionee authorizes a Participating Employer to withhold payroll deductions from his or her Compensation.
 
(n)   “Offering Period” means the period beginning, as determined by the Committee, on (1) the first business day coincident with or next following an Entry Date or (2) the first business day of the first and third calendar quarters of a calendar year (the “Offering Commencement Date”) and ending on the last business day of the second and fourth calendar quarters of a calendar year (the “Offering Termination Date”) or other six (6) month periods established by the Committee.
 
(o)   “Option” means an option to purchase shares of Stock granted under the Plan.
 
(p)   “Optionee” means an Eligible Employee to whom an Option is granted.
 
(q)   “Option Shares” means shares of Stock subject to an Option.
 
(r)    “Participating Employer” means the Company or any Related Corporation designated by the Committee to participate in the Plan as of an Entry Date.
 
(s)    “Plan” means this Boston Scientific Corporation 2006 Global Employee Stock Ownership Plan as set forth herein and as it may be amended from time to time.
 
(t)    “Related Corporation” means the Company and every U.S. corporation which is:  (i) a direct or indirect eighty percent (80%) or more-owned subsidiary of the Company; or (ii) a direct or indirect fifty percent (50%) or more-owned subsidiary of the Company designated by the Committee.
 
(u)   “Service” means, as determined by the Participating Employer, continuous regular employment by an individual with the Company or one of the Related Corporations, including any approved leaves of absence.
 
(v)    “Stock” means the common stock, $.01 par value per share, of the Company.
 
3.     Term of the Plan . After its adoption by the Board, the Plan shall become effective on July 1, 2006; provided , however , that the Plan shall be null and void if the Company’s shareholders do not approve the Plan within twelve (12) months before or after the date on which the Board adopts the Plan. No Option shall be granted under the Plan on or after July 1, 2016, but Options theretofore granted may extend beyond that date.
 
4.     Administration . The Plan shall be administered by the Committee, which shall have the authority and discretion to interpret the Plan, to prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to the Plan, to resolve all disputes arising under the Plan, to determine which Related Corporations shall become Participating Employers and as of what dates, to determine the terms of Options granted under the Plan, and to make all other determinations necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan. Any determination of the Committee shall be final and binding upon all persons having or claiming any interest under the Plan or under any Option granted pursuant to the Plan. The Committee shall have the express authority to delegate certain administrative responsibilities to other parties. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, the Committee may use telephonic media, electronic media, or other technology, including the Company’s website and the internet, in administering the Plan to the extent not prohibited by applicable law.
 
5.     Amendment and Termination . The Board may terminate or amend the Plan at any time and from time to time; provided , however , that the Board may not, without approval of the shareholders of the Company in a manner satisfying the requirements of Section 423 of the Code, increase the maximum number of shares of Stock available for purchase under the Plan. No termination of or amendment of the Plan may adversely affect the rights of an Optionee in the reasonable discretion of the Committee with
 
 
 

 
respect to any Option held by the Optionee as of the date of such termination or amendment without the Optionee’s consent.
 
6.     Shares of Stock Subject to the Plan . No more than an aggregate of 20 million shares of Stock may be issued or delivered pursuant to the exercise of Options granted under the Plan. Shares to be delivered upon the exercise of Options may be either shares of Stock which are authorized but unissued or shares of Stock held by the Company in its treasury or shares of Stock purchased on the open market by the Company for issuance under this Plan. If an Option expires or terminates for any reason without having been exercised in full, the unpurchased shares subject to the Option shall become available for other Options granted under the Plan. The Company shall, at all times during which Options are outstanding, reserve and keep available shares of Stock sufficient to satisfy such Options, and shall pay all fees and expenses incurred by the Company in connection therewith. In the event of any capital change in the outstanding Stock as contemplated by Section 8.9, the number and kind of shares of Stock reserved and kept available by the Company shall be appropriately adjusted.
 
7.     Eligibility . Each Employee of a Participating Employer shall be granted an Option on the first day of each Offering Period coincident with or next following the date on which such Employee meets all of the following requirements:
 
(a)    The Employee is customarily employed by a Participating Employer for twenty (20) hours or more per week;
 
(b)   The Employee will not, after grant of the Option, own stock possessing five (5) or more percent of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of stock of the Company or of any Related Corporation. For purposes of this paragraph (b), the rules of Section 424(d) of the Code shall apply in determining the stock ownership of the Employee, and stock which the Employee may purchase under outstanding options shall be treated as stock owned by the Employee; and
 
(c)    The Employee has properly completed an Enrollment Agreement electing to participate in the Plan as described in Section 8.2.
 
An Employee who meets all of the foregoing requirements is referred to as an “Eligible Employee.”
 
8.     Terms and Conditions of Options.
 
8.1   General . All Options granted to Eligible Employees shall comply with the terms and conditions set forth in Sections 8.1 through 8.10. Subject to Sections 8.2(d) and 8.8, each such Option shall entitle the Optionee to purchase that number of whole shares calculated in accordance with Sections 8.1 through 8.10 or such lesser number or value of shares established by the Committee as an additional limitation on the maximum number of Option Shares available under an Option.
 
8.2   Enrollment Agreement/Payroll Deductions.
 
(a)    An Eligible Employee may elect to purchase shares of Stock under his or her Option during an Offering Period by completing and submitting an Enrollment Agreement, in accordance with such procedures as set forth by the Committee, no later than ten (10) business days prior to the first day of an Offering Period. The Enrollment Agreement shall indicate the percentage of the Eligible Employee’s Compensation (from 1% through 10%, in multiples of 1%) that the Eligible Employee elects to be withheld on pay dates occurring during the Offering Period.
 
(b)   After the commencement of the Offering Period, no Eligible Employee shall be permitted to change the percentage of Compensation elected to be withheld during that Offering Period. However, the Eligible Employee may elect to discontinue his or her payroll deductions at any time during an Offering Period and withdraw them by submitting a request, in accordance with such procedures as set forth by the Committee, no later than ten (10) business days prior to the last day of the Offering Period. The change will be effective as of the first pay date occurring as soon as practicable after the Eligible Employee’s request has been received. As soon as practicable following receipt of the Eligible Employee’s request, the Eligible Employee shall receive a distribution of the accumulated payroll deductions, without interest.
 
(c)    Any Enrollment Agreement in effect for an Offering Period shall remain in effect as to any subsequent Offering Period unless revoked by the submission of a request to discontinue payroll
 
 
 

 
deductions for that Offering Period or modified by submission of a new Enrollment Agreement, or until the Optionee’s termination of Service for any reason.
 
(d)   Notwithstanding the provisions of this Section 8, an Eligible Employee may not be granted an Option if the Eligible Employee’s rights to purchase Stock under all employee stock purchase plans (as defined in Section 423(b) of the Code) of the Company and its Related Corporations accrue at a rate which exceeds $25,000 of Fair Market Value of the Stock (determined at the time such option is granted) for each calendar year in which such option is outstanding at any time. The accrual of rights to purchase Stock shall be determined in accordance with Section 423(b)(8) of the Code.
 
(e)    An Optionee may purchase Stock under the Plan only by payroll deduction. An Optionee may not make payroll deductions under the Plan for any period or periods after his or her termination of Service, even if he or she is then being paid salary continuation, severance benefits or other similar forms of compensation.
 
8.3   Purchase Price . The purchase price of Option Shares shall be the lesser of:  (a) eighty-five percent (85%) of the Fair Market Value of the Stock on the Offering Commencement Date; or (b) (whichever is applicable) eighty-five percent (85%) of the Fair Market Value of the Stock on the Offering Termination Date, if the Stock is acquired from the Company; or (2) eighty-five percent (85%) of the actual purchase price for such Stock on the Investment Date, if the Stock is, in fact, purchased on the New York Stock Exchange.
 
8.4   Exercise of Options . To the extent practicable, all of the Optionee’s payroll deductions accumulated during the Offering Period will be applied to purchase Option Shares on the Investment Date. On such date, and provided the Optionee is in-Service on the last day of the Offering Period, the Optionee shall purchase the number of whole shares purchasable by his or her accumulated payroll deductions during the Offering Period, or, if less, the maximum number of shares subject to the Option as provided in Section 8.1, provided that if the total number of shares which all Optionees elect to purchase, together with any shares already purchased under the Plan, exceeds the total number of shares which may be purchased under the Plan pursuant to Section 6, the number of shares which each Optionee is permitted to purchase shall be decreased pro rata based on the Optionee’s accumulated payroll deductions in relation to all accumulated payroll deductions currently being withheld under the Plan.
 
Accumulated payroll deductions, to the extent in excess of the aggregate purchase price of the shares purchased by the Optionee on an Investment Date or in excess of the $25,000 limit described in Section 8.2(d), shall be applied for the next Offering Period. At the request of the Optionee, following an Employee’s withdrawal from the Plan, an Employee’s termination of Service or as may be required by law, the excess payroll deductions shall be refunded to the Optionee, without interest, as soon as practicable.
 
8.5   Delivery of Stock.
 
(a)    Except as provided below, as soon as administratively practicable after the Investment Date, the Company shall deliver or cause to be delivered to the Optionee a certificate or certificates for the number of whole shares purchased by the Optionee for that Offering Period. A Stock certificate representing the number of shares purchased will be issued in the Optionee’s name only, or if the Optionee so requests in writing, not later than the last day of the Offering Period, in the name of the Optionee and another person of legal age as joint tenants with rights of survivorship. If any law or applicable regulation of the Securities Exchange Commission or other body having jurisdiction shall require that the Company or the Optionee take any action in connection with the shares being purchased under the Option, delivery of the certificate or certificates for such shares shall be postponed until the necessary action shall have been completed, which action shall be taken by the Company at its own expense, without unreasonable delay.
 
(b)   Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that shares are subject to a transferability restriction established by the Committee, as provided in Section 8.6(b), the Company may elect to hold for the benefit of the Optionee any shares otherwise to be delivered to the Optionee pursuant to this Section 8.5, or to deliver the same to such agents, trustees and fiduciaries for the benefit of the Optionee as the Company may elect, for the period transfer of such shares is limited by this Plan, if any, (and thereafter, until the Optionee requests delivery of such stock in writing). In that event, the Optionee shall have all of the rights of a shareholder in the shares so held by the Company or its agent,
 
 
 

 
except as limited by the restriction on transferability, from and after the issuance of the same and the Company or its agent, except as limited by the restriction on transferability, if any, from and after the issuance of the same and the Company or its agent shall adopt reasonable procedures to enable the Optionee to exercise such rights. In the event of the Optionee’s death while any shares are so held, such shares shall be delivered to the Optionee’s Beneficiary promptly following the Committee’s receipt of evidence satisfactory to the Committee of the Optionee’s death.
 
(c)    In lieu of issuing Stock certificates, the Committee may establish electronic book entry procedures (such as DWAC) to record an Optionee’s Stock acquired under the Plan. Notwithstanding, the Optionee shall always have the right to request issuance of a Stock certificate to evidence all or any number of whole shares of Stock he or she has purchased under the Plan. The Optionee shall pay all costs associated with issuing the Stock certificate or certificates described in this Section 8.5.
 
8.6   Restrictions on Transfer.
 
(a)    Options may not be assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise disposed of. An Option may not be exercised by anyone other than the Optionee during the lifetime of the Optionee.
 
(b)   Except as otherwise determined by the Committee, Stock acquired by exercise of an Option hereunder may not be assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise disposed of, except by will or under the laws of descent and distribution, until the date which is three (3) months after the last day of the Offering Period as of which such shares were acquired (or the date of the death of the Optionee, if earlier), but thereafter may be sold or otherwise transferred without restriction. The Optionee shall agree in the Enrollment Agreement to notify the Company of any transfer of the Option Shares within two (2) years of the first day of the Offering Period of those Option Shares. The Company shall have the right to place a legend on all stock certificates instructing the transfer agent to notify the Company of any transfer of the Option Shares. The Company shall also have the right to place a legend on certificates setting forth the restriction on transferability, if any, of such Option Shares.
 
8.7   Expiration . Each Option shall expire at the close of business on the Investment Date or on such earlier date as may result from the operation of Section 8.
 
8.8   Termination of Employment of Optionee . If an Optionee ceases for any reason to be in-Service, whether due to death, retirement, voluntary severance, involuntary severance, transfer, or disaffiliation of a Related Corporation with the Company, his or her Option shall immediately expire, and the Optionee’s accumulated payroll deductions shall be returned, without interest, as soon as practicable, to the Optionee or his or her Beneficiary, as the case may be, by the Participating Employer. For purposes of this Section 8.8, an Optionee shall be deemed to be in-Service throughout any leave of absence for military service, illness or other bona fide purpose which does not exceed the longer of ninety days or the period during which the Optionee’s reemployment rights are guaranteed by statute or by contract. If the Optionee does not return to Service prior to the termination of such period, his or her Service shall be deemed to have ended on the one-hundred eightieth (180 th ) day of such leave of absence. Distributions upon death will be made as soon as administratively practicable after the Optionee’s death upon presentation of satisfactory proof of death to the Participating Employer.
 
8.9   Capital Changes Affecting the Stock . In the event that, during an Offering Period, a stock dividend is paid or becomes payable in respect of the Stock or there occurs a split-up or contraction in the number of shares of Stock, the number of shares for which the Option may thereafter be exercised and the price to be paid for each such share shall be proportionately adjusted. In the event that, after the commencement of the Offering Period, there occurs a reclassification or change of outstanding shares of Stock or a consolidation or merger of the Company with or into another corporation or a sale or conveyance, substantially as a whole, of the property of the Company, the Optionee shall be entitled on the last day of the Offering Period to receive shares of stock or other securities equivalent in kind and value to the shares of Stock he or she would have held if he or she had exercised the Option in full immediately prior to such reclassification, change, consolidation, merger, sale or conveyance and had continued to hold such shares (together with all other shares and securities thereafter issued in respect thereof) until the last day of the Offering Period. In the event that there is to occur a recapitalization involving an increase in the par value of the Stock which would result in a par value exceeding the exercise price under an outstanding Option, the Company shall notify the Optionee of such proposed recapitalization immediately upon its
 
 
 

 
being recommended by the Board of the Company’s shareholders, after which the Optionee shall have the right to exercise his or her Option prior to such recapitalization; if the Optionee fails to exercise the Option prior to recapitalization, the exercise price under the Option shall be appropriately adjusted. In the event that, after the commencement of the Offering Period, there occurs a dissolution or liquidation of the Company, except pursuant to a transaction to which Section 424(a) of the Code applies, each Option shall terminate, but the Optionee shall have the right to exercise his or her Option prior to such dissolution or liquidation.
 
8.10   Return of Accumulated Payroll Deductions . In the event that the Optionee or his or her Beneficiary is entitled to the return of accumulated payroll deductions, whether by reason of an election to discontinue and withdraw payroll deductions, termination of employment, retirement, death, or, in the event that accumulated payroll deductions exceed the price of shares purchased or exceed the $25,000 limit described in Section 8.2(d), such amount shall be returned by the Participating Employer to the Optionee or the Beneficiary, as the case may be, as soon as practicable. Accumulated payroll deductions held by the Participating Employer shall not bear interest nor shall the Participating Employer be obligated to segregate the same from any of its other assets.
 
9.     No Enlargement of Employment Rights . Neither the establishment or continuation of the Plan, nor the grant of any Option hereunder, shall be deemed to give any employee the right to be retained in the employ of the Participating Employer, or any successor to either, or to interfere with the right of the Participating Employer or successor to discharge the employee at any time.
 
10.   Tax Withholding . If, at any time, a Participating Employer is required, under applicable laws and regulations, to withhold, or to make any deduction of, any taxes or take any other action in connection any exercise of an Option or transfer of shares of Stock, the Participating Employer shall have the right to deduct from all amounts paid in cash (including, but not limited to, base salary/wages and bonus/incentive compensation) any taxes required by law to be withheld therefrom, and in the case of shares of Stock, the Optionee or his or her estate or Beneficiary shall be required to pay the Participating Employer the amount of taxes required to be withheld, or, in lieu thereof, the Participating Employer shall have the right to retain, or sell without notice, a sufficient number of shares of Stock to cover the amount required to be withheld, or to make other arrangements with respect to withholding as it shall deem appropriate.
 
11.   Participating Employer with Non-U.S. Residents . With respect to any Participating Employer which employs Eligible Employees who reside outside of the United States, and notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Committee may in its sole discretion amend the terms of the Plan, or an Option granted under the Plan, in order to reflect the impact of local law and may, where appropriate, establish one or more sub-plans to reflect such amended provisions applicable to such Eligible Employees.
 
12.   Governing Law . The Plan and all Options and actions taken thereunder shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, without regard to the conflict of laws principles thereof.
 

 
 

 
 
EXHIBIT 10.24
FIRST AMENDMENT OF THE BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
2006 GLOBAL EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN
(U.S. PLAN DOCUMENT)


WHEREAS, Boston Scientific Corporation (the “Company”) has established and maintains the 2006 Boston Scientific Corporation Global Employee Stock Ownership Plan (U.S. Plan Document) (the “Plan”); and
 
WHEREAS, it is now considered desirable to amend the Plan;
 
NOW, THEREFORE, by virtue and in exercise of the power reserved to the Company by Section 5 of the Plan, and pursuant to the authority delegated to the undersigned officer of the Company by resolution of its Board of Directors, the Plan be and it is hereby amended, effective for the Offering Period beginning July 1, 2007, by substituting for Section 8.3 of the Plan the following:
 
“The purchase price of Option Shares shall be the lesser of: (a) ninety percent (90%) of the Fair Market Value of the Stock on the Offering Commencement Date; or (b) (whichever is applicable) (1) ninety percent (90%) of the Fair Market Value of the Stock on the Offering Termination Date, if the Stock is acquired from the Company; or (2) ninety percent (90%) of the actual purchase price for such Stock on the Investment Date, if the Stock is, in fact, purchased on the New York Stock Exchange.”

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officers, this ______ day of December, 2006.
 

 
 
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
By:

Its:

ATTEST:
 
By:

 
Its:

 
 
 

EXHIBIT 10.46

As Amended 10/96

GUIDANT CORPORATION 1994 STOCK PLAN

The Guidant Corporation 1994 Stock Plan ("1994 Plan") authorizes the Compensation Committee ("Committee") of the Board of Directors of Guidant Corporation to provide employees and consultants of Guidant Corporation and its subsidiaries with certain rights to acquire shares of Guidant Corporation common stock ("Guidant Stock"). The Company believes that this incentive program will benefit the Company's shareholders by allowing the Company to attract, motivate, and retain employees and consultants and by causing employees and consultants, through stock-based incentives, to contribute materially to the growth and success of the Company. For purposes of the 1994 Plan, the term "Company" shall mean Guidant Corporation and its subsidiaries, unless the context requires otherwise.

1. Administration.

The 1994 Plan shall be administered and interpreted by the Committee consisting of not less than three persons appointed by the Board of Directors of the Company from among its members. A person may serve on the Committee only if he or she (i) is a nonemployee director as defined in Rule 16b-3(b)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and (ii) satisfies the requirements of an "outside director" for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). The Committee shall determine the fair market value of Guidant Stock for purposes of the 1994 Plan. The Committee may, subject to the provisions of the 1994 Plan, from time to time establish such rules and regulations as it deems appropriate for the proper administration of the Plan. The Committee's decisions shall be final, conclusive, and binding with respect to the interpretation and administration of the 1994 Plan and any Grant made under it. Except to the extent expressly prohibited by the 1994 Plan or applicable law, the Committee may delegate to one or more of its members, or to one or more agents, such responsibility or duties as it deems desirable.

2. Grants.

Incentives under the 1994 Plan shall consist of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, performance awards, and restricted stock grants (collectively, "Grants"). All Grants shall be subject to the terms and conditions set out herein and to such other terms and conditions which are not inconsistent with the 1994 Plan as the Committee deems appropriate. The Committee shall approve the form and provisions of each Grant. Grants under a particular section of the 1994 Plan need not be uniform and Grants under two or more sections may be combined in one instrument.

3. Eligibility for Grants.

Grants may be made to any employee (including any officer) or consultant of the Company ("Eligible Person"). The Committee shall select the persons to receive Grants ("Grantees") from among the Eligible Persons and determine the number of shares subject to any particular Grant.

4. Shares Available for Grant.

(a) Shares Subject to Issuance or Transfer. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4(b), the aggregate number of shares of Guidant Stock that may be issued or transferred under the 1994 Plan is 7,000,000. The shares may be authorized but unissued shares or treasury shares. The number of shares available for Grants at any given time shall be 7,000,000, reduced by the aggregate of all shares previously issued or transferred and of shares which may become subject to issuance or transfer under then-outstanding Grants. Payment in cash in lieu of shares shall be deemed to be an issuance of the shares for purposes of determining the number of shares available for Grants under the 1994 Plan as a whole or to any individual Grantee.

(b) Adjustment Provisions. If any subdivision or combination of shares of Guidant Stock or any stock dividend, reorganization, recapitalization, or consolidation or merger with Guidant Corporation as the surviving corporation occurs, or if additional shares or new or different shares or other securities of the Company or any other issuer are distributed with respect to the shares of Guidant Stock through a spin-off, exchange offer, or other extraordinary distribution, the Committee shall make such adjustments as it determines appropriate in the number of shares of Guidant Stock that may be issued or transferred in the future under Sections 4(a) and 5(f). The Committee shall also adjust as it determines appropriate the number of shares and Option Price in outstanding Grants made before the event.

5. Stock Options.

The Committee may grant options qualifying as incentive stock options under the Code ("Incentive Stock Options"), and nonqualified options (collectively, "Stock Options"). The following provisions are applicable to Stock Options:

(a) Option Price. The Committee shall determine the price at which Guidant Stock may be purchased by the Grantee under a Stock Option ("Option Price") which, except in the case of substitute grants as described in Section 10(b), shall be not less than the fair market value of Guidant Stock on the date the Stock Option is granted (the "Grant Date"). In the Committee's discretion, the Grant Date of a Stock Option may be established as the date on which Committee action approving the Stock Option is taken or any later date specified by the Committee.

(b) Option Exercise Period. The Committee shall determine the option exercise period of each Stock Option. The period shall not exceed ten years from the Grant Date.

(c) Exercise of Option. A Grantee may exercise a Stock Option by delivering a notice of exercise to the Company or its representative as designated by the Committee, either with or without accompanying payment of the Option Price. The notice of exercise, once delivered, shall be irrevocable.

(d) Satisfaction of Option Price. The Grantee shall pay or cause to be paid the Option Price in cash, or with the Committee's permission, by delivering shares of Guidant Stock already owned by the Grantee and having a fair market value on the date of exercise equal to the Option Price, or a combination of cash and shares. In addition, the Committee may permit the exercise of an option by delivery of written notice, subject to the Company's receipt of a third-party payment in full in cash for the Option Price prior to the issuance of shares of Guidant Stock, in the manner and subject to the procedures as may be established by the Committee. Unless the Committee establishes a shorter period which is set forth in the Stock Option, the Grantee shall pay the Option Price not later than 30 days after the date of a statement from the Company following exercise setting forth the Option Price, fair market value of Guidant Stock on the exercise date, the number of shares of Guidant Stock that may be delivered in payment of the Option Price, and the amount of withholding tax due, if any. If the Grantee fails to pay the Option Price within the specified period, the Committee shall have the right to take whatever action it deems appropriate, including voiding the option exercise. The Company shall not issue or transfer shares of Guidant Stock upon exercise of a Stock Option until the Option Price and any required withholding tax are fully paid.

(e) Share Withholding. With respect to any nonqualified option, the Committee may, in its discretion and subject to such rules as the Committee may adopt, permit or require the Grantee to satisfy, in whole or in part, any withholding tax obligation which may arise in connection with the exercise of the nonqualified option by having the Company withhold shares of Guidant Stock having a fair market value equal to the amount of the withholding tax.

(f) Limits on Individual Grants. No individual Grantee may be granted Stock Options under the 1994 Plan for more than 700,000 shares of Guidant Stock during any three consecutive calendar years.

(g) Limits on Incentive Stock Options. The aggregate fair market value of the stock covered by Incentive Stock Options granted under the 1994 Plan or any other stock option plan of the Company or any subsidiary or parent of the Company that become exercisable for the first time by any employee in any calendar year shall not exceed $100,000. The aggregate fair market value will be determined at the Grant Date. An Incentive Stock Option shall not be granted to any Eligible Person who, on the Grant Date, owns stock possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or any subsidiary or parent of the Company.

6. Performance Awards.

The Committee may grant Performance Awards which shall be denominated at the time of grant either in shares of Guidant Stock ("Stock Performance Awards") or in dollar amounts ("Dollar Performance Awards"). Payment under a Stock Performance Award or a Dollar Performance Award shall be made, at the discretion of the Committee, in shares of Guidant Stock ("Performance Shares"), or in cash or in any combination thereof, if the financial performance of the Company or any subsidiary, division, or other unit of the Company ("Business Unit") selected by the Committee for the Award Period (as defined below). The following provisions are applicable to Performance Awards:

(a) Award Period. The Committee shall determine and include in the Grant the period of time (which shall be four or more consecutive fiscal quarters) for which a Performance Award is made ("Award Period"). Grants of Performance Awards need not be uniform with respect to the length of the Award Period. Award Periods for different Grants may overlap. A Performance Award may not be granted for a given Award Period after one half (1/2) or more of such period has elapsed.

(b) Performance Goals and Payment. Before a Grant is made, the Committee shall establish objectives ("Performance Goals") that must be met by the Business Unit during the Award Period as a condition to payment being made under the Performance Award. The Performance Goals, which must be set out in the Grant, may include earnings per share, return on assets, return on shareholders' equity, divisional income, net income, or any other financial measurement established by the Committee. The Committee shall also set forth in the Grant the number of Performance Shares or the amount of payment to be made under a Performance Award if the Performance Goals are met or exceeded, including the fixing of a maximum payment.

(c) Computation of Payment. After an Award Period, the financial performance of the Business Unit during the period shall be measured against the Performance Goals. If the Performance Goals are not met, no payment shall be made under a Performance Award. If the Performance Goals are met or exceeded, the Committee shall determine the number of Performance Shares or the amount of payment to be made under a Performance Award in accordance with the grant for each Grantee. The Committee, in its sole discretion, may elect to pay part or all of the Performance Award in cash in lieu of issuing or transferring Performance Shares. The cash payment shall be based on the fair market value of Guidant Stock on the date of payment. The Company shall promptly notify each Grantee of the number of Performance Shares and the amount of cash, if any, he or she is to receive.

(d) Revisions for Significant Events. At any time before payment is made, the Committee may revise the Performance Goals and the computation of payment if unforeseen events occur during an Award Period which have a substantial effect on the Performance Goals and which in the sole discretion of the Committee make the application of the Performance Goals unfair unless a revision is made.

(e) Requirement of Employment. To be entitled to receive payment under a Performance Award, a Grantee who is an employee of the Company must remain in the employment of the Company to the end of the Award Period, except that the Committee may provide for partial or complete exceptions to this requirement as it deems equitable in its sole discretion.

7. Restricted Stock Grants.

The Committee may issue or transfer shares of Guidant Stock to a Grantee under a Restricted Stock Grant. Upon the issuance or transfer, the Grantee shall be entitled to vote the shares and to receive any dividends paid. The following provisions are applicable to Restricted Stock Grants:

(a) Requirement of Employment. If the employment of a Grantee who is an employee of the Company terminates during the period designated in the Grant as the "Restriction Period," the Restricted Stock Grant terminates and the shares of Guidant Stock must be returned immediately to the Company. However, the Committee may provide for partial or complete exceptions to this requirement as it deems equitable.

(b) Restrictions on Transfer and Legend on Stock Certificate. During the Restriction Period, a Grantee may not sell, assign, transfer, pledge, or otherwise dispose of the shares of Guidant Stock except to a Successor Grantee under
Section 10(a). Each certificate for shares issued or transferred under a Restricted Stock Grant shall contain a restricted legend or be held in escrow by the Company until the expiration of the Restriction Period.

(c) Lapse of Restrictions. All restrictions imposed under the Restricted Stock Grant shall lapse (i) upon the expiration of the Restriction Period if all conditions, including those stated in Sections 7(a) and (b) have been met or (ii) as provided under
Section 9(a)(ii). The Grantee shall then be entitled to delivery of the certificate.

8. Amendment and Termination of the 1994 Plan.

(a) Amendment. The Company's Board of Directors may amend or terminate the 1994 Plan, subject to shareholder approval to the extent necessary for the continued applicability of Rule 16b- 3 under the Exchange Act, but no amendment shall withdraw from the Committee the right to select Grantees under Section 3.

(b) Termination of 1994 Plan. The 1994 Plan shall terminate on May 31, 2000, unless terminated earlier by the Board or unless extended by the Board.

(c) Termination and Amendment of Outstanding Grants. A termination or amendment of the 1994 Plan that occurs after a Grant is made shall not result in the termination or amendment of the Grant unless the Grantee consents or unless the Committee acts under Section 11(e). The termination of the 1994 Plan shall not impair the power and authority of the Committee with respect to outstanding Grants. Whether or not the 1994 Plan has terminated, an outstanding Grant may be terminated or amended under Section 11(e) or may be amended (i) by agreement of the Company and the Grantee consistent with the 1994 Plan or (ii) by action of the Committee provided that the amendment is consistent with the 1994 Plan and is found by the Committee not to materially impair the rights of the Grantee under the Grant.

9. Change of Control.

(a) Effect on Grants. Unless the Committee shall otherwise expressly provide in the agreement relating to a Grant, upon the occurrence of a Change of Control (as defined below):

(i) In the case of Stock Options, (A) each outstanding Stock Option that is not then fully exercisable shall automatically become fully exercisable until the termination of the option exercise period of the Stock Option (as modified by subsection
(i)(B) that follows, and (B) in the event the Grantee's employment is terminated within two years after a Change of Control, his or her outstanding Stock Options at that date of termination shall be immediately exercisable for a period of three months following such termination, provided, however, that, to the extent the Stock Option by its terms otherwise permits a longer option exercise period after such termination, such longer period shall govern, and provided further that in no event shall a Stock Option be exercisable more than 10 years after the Grant Date;

(ii) The Restriction Period on all outstanding Restricted Stock Grants shall automatically expire and all restrictions imposed under such Restricted Stock Grants shall immediately lapse; and

(iii) Each Grantee of a Performance Award for an Award Period that has not been completed at the time of the Change of Control shall be deemed to have earned a minimum Performance Award equal to the product of (A) such Grantee's maximum award opportunity for such Performance Award and (B) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of full and partial months that have elapsed since the beginning of such Award Period to the date on which the Change of Control occurs, and the denominator of which is the total number of months in such Award Period.

(b) Change of Control. For purposes of the 1994 Plan, a Change of Control shall mean the happening of any of the following events:

(i) The acquisition by any "person," as that term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act (other than (A) the Company, (B) any subsidiary of the Company, (C) any employee or directors' benefit plan or stock plan of the Company or a subsidiary of the Company, or any trustee or fiduciary with respect to any such plan when acting in that capacity, or (D) any person who acquires such shares pursuant to a transaction or series of transactions approved prior to such transaction(s) by the Board of Directors of the Company) of "beneficial ownership" as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act, directly or indirectly, of 20% or more of the shares of the Company's capital stock the holders of which have general voting power under ordinary circumstances to elect at least a majority of the Board of Directors of the Company (or which would have such voting power but for the application of the Indiana Control Share Statute) ("Voting Stock");

(ii) the first day on which less than two-thirds of the total membership of the Board of Directors of the Company shall be Continuing Directors (as that term is defined in Article 6(f) of the Company's Articles of Incorporation;

(iii) approval by the shareholders of the Company of a merger, share exchange, or consolidation of the Company (a "Transaction"), other than a Transaction which would result in the Voting Stock of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity) more than 50% of the Voting Stock of the Company or such surviving entity immediately after such Transaction; or

(iv) approval by the shareholders of the Company of a complete liquidation of the Company or a sale or disposition of all or substantially all the assets of the Company.

10. Eligible Persons Resident Outside the United States.

The following provisions shall apply to each Eligible Person who is resident outside the United States:

(a) Determination of Eligible Locations. The Committee shall determine whether it is feasible or desirable under local law, custom and practice to make Grants at each location outside the United States. In making this determination as of any Grant Date, the Committee may differentiate among classes of individuals (including expatriates, third country nationals or international assignees) and locations within a particular country.

(b) Special Terms Applicable to Grants. In order to facilitate the making of Grants under this Section 10, the Committee may provide for such special terms for Grants to Grantees who are foreign nationals or who are employed outside the United States as the Committee may consider necessary or desirable to accommodate differences in local law, policy or custom, or to take advantage of special tax or social insurance regimes applicable in a particular jurisdiction. The Committee may approve such supplements, restatements or alternate versions of the Plan as it may consider necessary or desirable for such purposes, without thereby affecting the terms of the Plan as in effect for any other purpose. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Committee may adopt special sub-plans applicable to individuals in particular jurisdictions (e.g., French or U.K. qualified plans), may provide for accelerated vesting with restrictions on the shares received under a Grant, and may condition Grants on acknowledgments or agreements by Grantees tailored to local law.

(c) No Acquired Rights. Nothing in the 1994 Plan or in this Section 10 shall confer upon any individual in any country the right to receive (or to continue to receive) any Grant, any form of Grant or to receive any benefit in lieu of a Grant hereunder, nor to have any special tax treatment apply to any Grant.

11. General Provisions.

(a) Transfer of Grants. Only a Grantee or his or her authorized legal representative or valid transferee may exercise rights under a Grant. Such persons may not transfer those rights. Except as set forth below, the rights under a Grant may not be disposed of by transfer, alienation, pledge, encumbrance, assignment, or any other means, whether voluntary, involuntary, or by operation of law, and any such attempted disposition shall be void. Notwithstanding the foregoing and solely to the extent permitted by the Committee in an agreement relating to a Grant, rights under a Grant (other than pursuant to an Incentive Stock Option) may be transferred to members of a Grantee's immediate family, charitable institutions, or trusts or partnerships whose beneficiaries are any of the foregoing, or to such other persons or entities as may be approved by the Committee, in each case subject to the condition that the Committee be satisfied that such transfer is being made for estate or tax planning purposes or for donative purposes without consideration being received therefor. In addition, when a Grantee dies, the personal representative or other person entitled to succeed to the rights of the Grantee may exercise the rights. A successor to the rights under a Grant pursuant to the foregoing ("Successor Grantee") must furnish proof satisfactory to the Company of his or her right to receive the Grant, whether as a result of a transfer from the Grantee, under the Grantee's will or under the applicable laws of descent and distribution.

(b) Substitute Grants. The Committee may make a Grant to an employee of another corporation who becomes an Eligible Person by reason of a corporate merger, consolidation, acquisition of stock or property, reorganization or liquidation involving the Company in substitution for a stock option, performance award, or restricted stock grant granted by such other corporation ("Substituted Stock Incentive"). The terms and conditions of the substitute Grant may vary from the terms and conditions required by the 1994 Plan and from those of the Substituted Stock Incentives. The Committee shall prescribe the exact provisions of the substitute Grants, preserving to the extent the Committee deems practical the provisions of the Substituted Stock Incentives. The Committee shall also determine the number of shares of Guidant Stock to be taken into account under Section 4.

(c) Subsidiaries. The term "subsidiary" means a corporation of which Guidant owns directly or indirectly 50% or more of the voting power.

(d) Fractional Shares. Fractional shares shall not be issued or transferred under a Grant, but the Committee may pay cash in lieu of a fraction or round the fraction.

(e) Compliance with Law. The 1994 Plan, the exercise of Grants, and the obligations of the Company to issue or transfer shares of Guidant Stock under Grants shall be subject to all applicable laws and regulations and to approvals by any governmental or regulatory agency as may be required. The Committee may revoke any Grant if it is contrary to law or modify a Grant to bring it into compliance with any valid and mandatory law or governmental regulation. The Committee may also adopt rules regarding the withholding of taxes on payment to Grantees.

(f) Ownership of Stock. A Grantee or Successor Grantee shall have no rights as a stockholder of the Company with respect to any shares of Guidant Stock covered by a Grant until the shares are issued or transferred to the Grantee or Successor Grantee on the Company's books.

(g) No Right to Employment. The 1994 Plan and the Grants under it shall not confer upon any Grantee the right to continue in the employment of the Company or affect in any way the right of the Company to terminate the employment of a Grantee at any time, with or without notice or cause.

(h) Foreign Jurisdictions. The Committee may adopt, amend, and terminate such arrangements, not inconsistent with the intent of the 1994 Plan, as it may deem necessary or desirable to make available tax or other benefits of the laws of foreign jurisdictions to Grantees who are subject to such laws.

(i) Governing Law. The 1994 Plan and all Grants made under it shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Indiana, regardless of the laws that might otherwise govern under applicable Indiana conflict-of-laws principles.

(j) Effective Date of the 1994 Plan. The 1994 Plan shall become effective on October 17, 1994.

***


EXHIBIT 10.47

GUIDANT CORPORATION

1996 NONEMPLOYEE DIRECTORS STOCK PLAN, AS AMENDED

ARTICLE I

PURPOSE

1.1 This Guidant Corporation 1996 Nonemployee Directors Stock Plan is intended to advance the interests of Guidant Corporation and its shareholders by attracting, retaining and motivating the performance of nonemployee directors of Guidant Corporation and to encourage and enable such directors to acquire and retain a proprietary interest in Guidant Corporation by ownership of its stock.

ARTICLE II

DEFINITIONS

2.1 "Board" means the Board of Directors of the Company.

2.2 "Code" means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

2.3 "Common Stock" means the Company's common stock.

2.4 "Company" means Guidant Corporation.

2.5 "Date of Grant" means the date on which an option is granted in accordance with Section 3.3 or Section 5.1 hereof or a Restricted Stock Award is granted in accordance with Section 6.1 hereof.

2.6 "Disability" means a permanent and total disability within the meaning of Section 22(e)(3) of the Code.

2.7 "Exchange Act" means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

2.8 "Fair Market Value" means the average of the highest and lowest sale prices of a share of Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on the date as of which fair market value is to be determined or, in the absence of any reported sales of Common Stock on such date, on the first preceding date on which any such sale shall have been reported. If Common Stock is not listed on the NYSE on the date as of which fair market value is to be determined, the Board shall determine in good faith the fair market value in whatever manner it considers appropriate.


2.9 "Grant" means the Options and Restricted Stock Awards granted to a Grantee under the Plan.

2.10 "Grantee" means a person to whom an Option or a Restricted Stock Award has been granted under the Plan.

2.11 "Nonemployee Director" means any member of the Board who is not an employee of the Company.

2.12 "Option" means a stock option granted under the Plan.

2.13 "Option Price" means the price at which each share of Common Stock subject to an Option may be purchased, determined in accordance with Section 3.3 or Section 5.2 hereof.

2.14 "Plan" means this Guidant Corporation 1996 Nonemployee Directors Stock Plan, as amended.

2.15 "Restricted Stock Award" means an award of Common Stock granted under the Plan and subject to the restrictions set forth herein.

2.16 "Restricted Stock Notice" means a notification by the Company to a Grantee pursuant to which Common Stock will be issued or transferred to a Grantee under the Plan.

2.17 "Rule 16b-3" means Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

2.18 "Stock Option Notice" means a notification by the Company to a Grantee pursuant to which a Grantee may purchase Common Stock under the Plan.

ARTICLE III

ADMINISTRATION; GRANTS

3.1 Board Authority. Subject to the express provisions of the Plan, the Board shall have discretionary authority to interpret the Plan, to prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to it, to determine the details and provisions of each Stock Option Notice and Restricted Stock Notice, and to make all the determinations necessary or advisable in the administration of the Plan. All such actions and determinations by the Board shall be conclusively binding for all purposes and upon all persons. The Board shall not be liable for any action or determination made in good faith with respect to the Plan, any Option or Restricted Stock Award or any Stock Option Notice or Restricted Stock Notice entered into hereunder.

3.2 Annual Retainer Grants. Commencing with the 2003 annual meeting of the Company's shareholders and on the date of each annual meeting thereafter, each Nonemployee Director who is a member of the Board immediately following each such

2

annual meeting shall receive, as determined by the Board, a grant of (i) an Option to purchase shares of Common Stock in accordance with the provisions of Article V hereof and (ii) a Restricted Stock Award in accordance with the provisions of Article VI hereof.

3.3 Discretionary Option Grants. The Board may make discretionary Grants of Options to any Nonemployee Director in accordance with the provisions of this Section 3.3. The Board shall select the persons who will receive Options under this Section 3.3 from among the Nonemployee Directors and determine the number of shares subject to any particular Option. The Option Price of each share of Common Stock subject to an Option under this Section 3.3 shall be 100 percent of the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the Date of Grant. The Board shall determine the exercise period of each Option granted under this Section 3.3, which shall not exceed ten years from the Date of Grant. Such exercise period shall be set forth in the related Stock Option Notice which shall be prepared and delivered as provided in the last sentence of Section 5.1 hereof. A Grantee may exercise an Option granted under this Section 3.3 in the manner and in accordance with the provisions set forth in Section 5.5 hereof.

ARTICLE IV

SHARES OF STOCK SUBJECT TO PLAN

4.1 Number of Shares. Subject to adjustment pursuant to the provisions of this Article IV, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock which may be issued and sold hereunder shall be 250,000(1) shares. Shares of Common Stock issued and sold under the Plan may be either authorized but unissued shares or shares held in the Company's treasury. Shares of Common Stock covered by an Option that shall have been exercised shall not again be available for grant. If an Option shall terminate for any reason without being wholly exercised, the number of shares to which such Option termination relates shall again be available for grant hereunder. Shares of Common Stock covered by a Restricted Stock Award for which the restrictions have lapsed shall not again be available for grant. If a Restricted Stock Award shall terminate for any reason prior to the time its restrictions shall have lapsed, the number of shares to which such Restricted Stock Award relates shall again be available for grant hereunder.

4.2 Antidilution. If any subdivision or combination of shares of Common Stock or any stock dividend, reorganization, recapitalization, or consolidation or merger with the Company as the surviving corporation occurs, or if additional shares or new or different shares or other securities of the Company or any other issuer are distributed with respect to the shares of Common Stock through a spin-off, exchange offer, or other extraordinary distribution, the Board shall make such adjustments as it determines appropriate in the number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued or transferred in the future under Articles III, V and VI. The Board shall also adjust as it determines appropriate the number of shares and Option Price in outstanding Grants made before the event.


(1) This is the original number of shares authorized for the Plan in 1996. It does not reflect subsequent stock splits.

3

ARTICLE V

ANNUAL RETAINER OPTIONS

5.1 Grant of Option. Commencing with the 2003 annual meeting of the Company's shareholders and on the date of each annual meeting thereafter, each Nonemployee Director who is a member of the Board immediately following each such annual meeting shall receive a grant of an Option to purchase Common Stock as determined in accordance with Section 3.2 hereof. The Company shall deliver to the Grantee a Stock Option Notice which shall set forth such terms and conditions of the Option as may be determined by the Board to be consistent with the Plan, and which may include additional provisions and restrictions that are not inconsistent with the Plan.

5.2 Option Price. The Option Price of each share of Common Stock subject to an Option shall be 100 percent of the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the Date of Grant.

5.3 Vesting; Term of Option. An Option granted under Section 5.1 hereof shall vest and become fully exercisable on the first date following the Date of Grant on which is held the annual meeting of the shareholders of the Company, provided that the Grantee is a member of the Board immediately preceding such annual meeting. In the event of the Grantee's death or Disability, an Option shall become fully vested and immediately exercisable. The period during which a vested Option may be exercised shall be ten years from the Date of Grant, subject to Section 5.4 hereof.

5.4 Termination of Option. A vested Option granted under Section 5.1 hereof may be exercised prior to the Termination Date. The Termination Date shall be the earliest to occur of (i) ten years from the Date of Grant; (ii) the day of resignation or removal from the Board, except by reason of (a) death, (b) retirement from the Board, or (c) Disability; (iii) the corresponding calendar day in the sixtieth month following (a) the date the Grantee retires from the Board or (b) the day on which the Grantee's seat on the Board is terminated by reason of Disability, or on the last day of that sixtieth month if there is no corresponding day in that month; or (iv) the corresponding calendar day in the sixtieth month following the date of death of the Grantee while an active member of the Board or on the last day of that sixtieth month if there is no corresponding day in that month.

5.5 Option Exercise. A Grantee may exercise an Option by delivering notice of exercise to the Company or its representative as designated by the Board, either with or without accompanying payment of the Option Price. The notice of exercise, once delivered, shall be irrevocable. The Grantee shall pay or cause to be paid the Option Price in cash, or with the Board's permission, by delivering shares of Common Stock already owned by the Grantee and having a fair market value on the date of exercise equal to the Option Price, or a combination of cash and shares. In addition, the Board may permit the exercise of an Option by delivery of written notice, subject to the Company's receipt of a third-party payment in full in cash for the Option Price prior to the issuance of Common Stock, in the manner and subject to the procedures as may be established by the Board. Unless the Board establishes a

4

shorter period which is set forth in the Stock Option Notice, the Grantee shall pay the Option Price not later than 30 days after the date of a statement from the Company following exercise setting forth the Option Price, fair market value of Common Stock on the exercise date, the number of shares of Common Stock that may be delivered in payment of the Option Price, and the amount of withholding tax due, if any. If the Grantee fails to pay the Option Price within the specified period, the Board shall have the right to take whatever action it deems appropriate, including voiding the Option exercise. The Company shall not issue or transfer shares of Common Stock upon exercise of an Option until the Option Price is fully paid.

ARTICLE VI

RESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS

6.1 Restricted Stock Award. Commencing with the 2003 annual meeting of the Company's shareholders and on the date of each annual meeting thereafter, each Nonemployee Director who is a member of the Board immediately following each such annual meeting shall receive a grant of a Restricted Stock Award determined in accordance with Section 3.2 hereof. The Company shall deliver to the Grantee a Restricted Stock Notice which shall set forth such terms and conditions of the Restricted Stock Award as may be determined by the Board to be consistent with the Plan, and which may include additional provisions and restrictions that are not inconsistent with the Plan. Upon the issuance or transfer of a Restricted Stock Award, the Grantee shall be entitled to vote the shares and to receive any dividends paid thereon.

6.2 Restriction Period. The rights of a Grantee in respect of a Restricted Stock Award shall be subject to a "Restriction Period" (after which restrictions shall lapse), which shall mean a period commencing on the Date of Grant and ending on the first date following the Date of Grant on which is held the annual meeting of the shareholders of the Company, provided that the Grantee is a member of the Board immediately preceding such annual meeting.

6.3 Requirement of Service. If the Grantee's service as a member of the Board is terminated for any reason during the Restriction Period, the Restricted Stock Award shall terminate and the shares of Common Stock must be returned immediately to the Company; provided, however, the Restriction Period for any Restricted Stock Award shall expire and all restrictions shall lapse upon the Grantee's death or Disability.

6.4 Restrictions on Transfer and Legend on Stock Certificate. During the Restriction Period, a Grantee may not sell, assign, transfer, pledge, or otherwise dispose of the shares of Common Stock except in accordance with
Section 9.1 hereof. Each certificate for shares issued or transferred under a Restricted Stock Award shall be held in escrow by the Company until the expiration of the Restriction Period.

6.5 Lapse of Restrictions. All restrictions imposed under the Restricted Stock Award shall lapse (i) upon the expiration of the Restriction Period if all conditions stated in

5

Sections 6.3 and 6.4 have been met or (ii) as provided under Section 7.1(b). The Grantee shall then be entitled to delivery of the certificate.

ARTICLE VII

CHANGE OF CONTROL

7.1 Effect of Grants. Unless the Board shall otherwise expressly provide in the agreement relating to a Grant, upon the occurrence of a Change of Control (as defined below):

(a) Each outstanding Option that is not then fully exercisable shall automatically become immediately and fully exercisable and shall remain exercisable until the termination of the Option exercise period applicable to the Option under Section 3.3 or Article V as the case may be; and

(b) The Restriction Period on an outstanding Restricted Stock Award shall automatically expire and all restrictions imposed under such Restricted Stock Award shall immediately lapse.

7.2 Change of Control. For purposes of the Plan, a Change of Control shall mean the happening of any of the following events:

(a) The acquisition by any "person," as that term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act (other than (i) the Company, (ii) any subsidiary of the Company, (iii) any employee or directors' benefit plan or stock plan of the Company or a subsidiary of the Company, or any trustee or fiduciary with respect to any such plan when acting in that capacity, or (iv) any person who acquires such shares pursuant to a transaction or series of transactions approved prior to such transaction(s) by the Board) of "beneficial ownership," as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act, directly or indirectly, of 20% or more of the shares of the Company's capital stock, the holders of which have general voting power under ordinary circumstances to elect at least a majority of the Board (or which would have such voting power but for the application of the Indiana Control Share Statute) ("Voting Stock");

(b) the first day on which less than two-thirds of the total membership of the Board shall be Continuing Directors (as that term is defined in Article 6(f) of the Company's Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation);

(c) approval by the shareholders of the Company of a merger, share exchange, or consolidation of the Company (a "Transaction"), other than a Transaction which would result in the Voting Stock of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity) more than 50% of the Voting Stock of the Company or such surviving entity immediately after such Transaction; or

6

(d) approval by the shareholders of the Company of a complete liquidation of the Company or a sale or disposition of all or substantially all the assets of the Company.

For purposes hereof, the term "subsidiary" means a corporation of which the Company owns directly or indirectly 50% or more of the voting power.

ARTICLE VIII

EFFECTIVE DATE, TERMINATION AND AMENDMENT

8.1 Effective Date. The Plan shall become effective after its adoption by the Board and on the date of its approval by the affirmative votes of the shareholders of the Company present, or represented, and entitled to vote at a meeting duly held in accordance with applicable state law and the Articles of Incorporation and By-laws of the Company.

8.2 Termination. The Plan shall terminate on the date following the date of the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company. The Board may, in its sole discretion and at any earlier date, terminate the Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no termination of the Plan shall in any manner affect any Grant theretofore granted without the consent of the Grantee or the permitted transferee of the Grant.

8.3 Amendment. The Board may at any time and from time to time and in any respect, amend or modify the Plan; provided, however, that, solely to the extent necessary to comply with Rule 16b-3 (i) the Board may not act more than once every six months to amend the provisions of the Plan relating to the determination of the amount, price or timing of any Grant under the Plan; and
(ii) the approval of the Company's shareholders will be required for any amendment that (a) changes the class of persons eligible for the Grants, (b) increases (other than as described in Section 4.2 hereof) the maximum number of shares of Common Stock subject to grant under the Plan, as specified in Section 4.1 hereof, or (c) materially increases the benefits accruing to Grantees under the Plan, within the meaning of Rule 16b-3. Any such approval shall be by the affirmative votes of the shareholders of the Company present, or represented, and entitled to vote at a meeting duly held in accordance with applicable state law and the Articles of Incorporation and By-laws of the Company. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no amendment or modification of the Plan shall in any manner affect any Grant theretofore granted without the consent of the Grantee or the permitted transferee of the Grant.

ARTICLE IX

MISCELLANEOUS

9.1 Nontransferability of Grant. No Grant shall be transferred by a Grantee other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution. No transfer of a Grant by the Grantee by will or by laws of descent and distribution shall be effective to bind the Company unless the Company shall have been furnished with written notice thereof and an authenticated copy of

7

the will and/or such other evidence as the Board may deem necessary to establish the validity of the transfer. During the lifetime of the Grantee, the Grant shall be exercisable only by such Grantee, except that, in the case of a Grantee who is legally incapacitated, the Grant shall be exercisable by the Grantee's guardian or legal representative.

9.2 Rights as Shareholder. A Grantee or the permitted transferee of a Grant shall have no rights as a shareholder with respect to any shares subject to such Grant prior to the purchase of such shares by exercise of an Option, or with respect to a Restricted Stock Award prior to the lapse of the restrictions, except as provided herein or in the applicable Stock Option Notice or Restricted Stock Notice. Nothing contained herein, or in the Stock Option Notice or Restricted Stock Notice relating to any Grant shall create an obligation on the part of the Company to repurchase any shares of Common Stock purchased hereunder.

9.3 Service on Board. Nothing in the Plan, in the grant of any Option or Restricted Stock Award or in any Stock Option Notice or Restricted Stock Notice shall confer upon any Nonemployee Director the right to continue service as a member of the Board.

9.4 Compliance with Law. The Plan, the exercise of Grants, and the obligations of the Company to issue or transfer shares of Common Stock under Grants shall be subject to all applicable laws and regulations and to approvals by any governmental or regulatory agency as may be required. The Board may revoke any Grant if it is contrary to law or modify a Grant to bring it into compliance with any valid and mandatory law or government regulation.

9.5 Section 83(b) Election. If a Grantee shall make an election pursuant to Section 83(b) of the Code with respect to a Restricted Stock Award, the Grantee shall, within 30 days following the Date of Grant, furnish to the Company a copy of such election.

9.6 Plan Binding on Successors. The Plan shall be binding upon the Company, its successors and assigns, and the Grantee, the Grantee's executor, administrator and permitted transferee.

9.7 Construction and Interpretation. Whenever used herein, nouns in the singular shall include the plural, and the masculine pronoun shall include the feminine gender. Headings of Articles and Sections hereof are inserted for convenience and reference and constitute no part of the Plan.

9.8 Severability. If any provision of the Plan or any Stock Option Notice or Restricted Stock Notice shall be determined to be illegal or unenforceable by any court of law in any jurisdiction, the remaining provisions hereof and thereof shall be severable and enforceable in accordance with their terms, and all provisions shall remain enforceable in any other jurisdiction.

8

9.9 Governing Law. The validity and construction of this Plan and of any Stock Option Notice or Restricted Stock Notice shall be governed by the laws of the State of Indiana.

9

EXHIBIT 10.48

GUIDANT CORPORATION

1998 STOCK PLAN, AS AMENDED

The Guidant Corporation 1998 Stock Plan, as amended, ("1998 Plan") authorizes the Management Development and Compensation Committee ("Committee") of the Board of Directors of Guidant Corporation to provide employees and consultants of Guidant Corporation and its subsidiaries with certain rights to acquire shares of Guidant Corporation common stock ("Guidant Stock"). The Company believes that this incentive program will benefit the Company's shareholders by allowing the Company to attract, motivate, and retain employees and consultants and by causing employees and consultants, through stock-based incentives, to contribute materially to the growth and success of the Company. For purposes of the 1998 Plan, the term "Company" shall mean Guidant Corporation and its subsidiaries, unless the context requires otherwise.

1. ADMINISTRATION.

The 1998 Plan shall be administered and interpreted by the Committee consisting of not less than three persons appointed by the Board of Directors of the Company from among its members. A person may serve on the Committee only if he or she (i) is a nonemployee director as defined in Rule 16b-3(b)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and (ii) satisfies the requirements of an "outside director" for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). The Committee shall determine the fair market value of Guidant Stock for purposes of the 1998 Plan. The Committee may, subject to the provisions of the 1998 Plan, from time to time establish such rules and regulations as it deems appropriate for the proper administration of the Plan. The Committee's decisions shall be final, conclusive, and binding with respect to the interpretation and administration of the 1998 Plan and any Grant made under it. Except to the extent expressly prohibited by the 1998 Plan or applicable law, the Committee may delegate to one or more of its members, or to one or more agents, such responsibility or duties as it deems desirable.

2. GRANTS.

Incentives under the 1998 Plan shall consist of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, performance awards, and restricted stock grants (collectively, "Grants"). All Grants shall be subject to the terms and conditions set out herein and to such other terms and conditions which are not inconsistent with the 1998 Plan as the Committee deems appropriate. The Committee shall approve the form and provisions of each Grant. Grants under a particular section of the 1998 Plan need not be uniform and Grants under two or more sections may be combined in one instrument.

3. ELIGIBILITY FOR GRANTS.

Grants may be made to any employee (including any officer) or consultant of the Company ("Eligible Person"). The Committee shall select the persons to receive Grants ("Grantees") from among the Eligible Persons and determine the number of shares subject to any particular Grant.

4. SHARES AVAILABLE FOR GRANT.

(a) Shares Subject to Issuance or Transfer. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4(b), the aggregate number of shares of Guidant Stock that may be issued or transferred under the 1998 Plan is


22,500,000(1); provided, however, that the aggregate number of such shares that may be issued or transferred as Restricted Stock Grants under the 1998 Plan is 5,000,000. The shares may be authorized but unissued shares or treasury shares. The number of shares available for Grants at any given time shall be 22,500,000 (5,000,000 in the case of Restricted Stock Grants), reduced by the aggregate of all shares previously issued or transferred and of shares which may become subject to issuance or transfer under then-outstanding Grants. Payment in cash in lieu of shares shall be deemed to be an issuance of the shares for purposes of determining the number of shares available for Grants under the 1998 Plan as a whole or to any individual Grantee.

(b) Adjustment Provisions. If any subdivision or combination of shares of Guidant Stock or any stock dividend, reorganization, recapitalization, or consolidation or merger with Guidant Corporation as the surviving corporation occurs, or if additional shares or new or different shares or other securities of the Company or any other issuer are distributed with respect to the shares of Guidant Stock through a spin-off, exchange offer, or other extraordinary distribution, the Committee shall make such adjustments as it determines appropriate in the number of shares of Guidant Stock that may be issued or transferred in the future under Sections 4(a), 5(f) and 6(f). The Committee shall also adjust as it determines appropriate the number of shares and Option Price in outstanding Grants made before the event.

5. STOCK OPTIONS.

The Committee may grant options qualifying as incentive stock options under the Code ("Incentive Stock Options"), and nonqualified options (collectively, "Stock Options"). The following provisions are applicable to Stock Options:

(a) Option Price. The Committee shall determine the price at which Guidant Stock may be purchased by the Grantee under a Stock Option ("Option Price") which, except in the case of substitute grants as described in Section 11(b), shall be not less than the fair market value of Guidant Stock on the date the Stock Option is granted (the "Grant Date"). In the Committee's discretion, the Grant Date of a Stock Option may be established as the date on which Committee action approving the Stock Option is taken or any later date specified by the Committee.

(b) Option Exercise Period. The Committee shall determine the option exercise period of each Stock Option. The period shall not exceed ten years from the Grant Date.

(c) Exercise of Option. A Grantee may exercise a Stock Option by delivering a notice of exercise to the Company or its representative as designated by the Committee, either with or without accompanying payment of the Option Price. The notice of exercise, once delivered, shall be irrevocable.

(d) Satisfaction of Option Price. The Grantee shall pay or cause to be paid the Option Price in cash, or with the Committee's permission, by delivering shares of Guidant Stock already owned by the Grantee and having a fair market value on the date of exercise equal to the Option Price, or a combination of cash and shares. In addition, the Committee may permit the exercise of an option by delivery of written notice, subject to the Company's receipt of a third-party payment in full in cash for the Option Price prior to the issuance of shares of Guidant Stock, in the manner and subject to the procedures as may be established by the Committee. Unless the Committee establishes a shorter period which is set forth in the Stock Option, the Grantee shall pay the Option Price not later than 30 days after the date of a statement from the Company following


(1) Numbers presented are as originally authorized and do not reflect the subsequent adjustments made pursuant to Section 4(b) for stock splits and similar events.

2

exercise setting forth the Option Price, fair market value of Guidant Stock on the exercise date, the number of shares of Guidant Stock that may be delivered in payment of the Option Price, and the amount of withholding tax due, if any. If the Grantee fails to pay the Option Price within the specified period, the Committee shall have the right to take whatever action it deems appropriate, including voiding the option exercise. The Company shall not issue or transfer shares of Guidant Stock upon exercise of a Stock Option until the Option Price and any required withholding tax are fully paid.

(e) Share Withholding. With respect to any nonqualified option, the Committee may, in its discretion and subject to such rules as the Committee may adopt, permit or require the Grantee to satisfy, in whole or in part, any withholding tax obligation which may arise in connection with the exercise of the nonqualified option by having the Company withhold shares of Guidant Stock having a fair market value equal to the amount of the withholding tax.

(f) Limits on Individual Grants. No individual Grantee may be granted Stock Options under the 1998 Plan for more than 700,000 shares of Guidant Stock during any one calendar year.

(g) Limits on Incentive Stock Options. The aggregate fair market value of the stock covered by Incentive Stock Options granted under the 1998 Plan or any other stock option plan of the Company or any subsidiary or parent of the Company that become exercisable for the first time by any employee in any calendar year shall not exceed $100,000. The aggregate fair market value will be determined at the Grant Date. An Incentive Stock Option shall not be granted to any Eligible Person who, on the Grant Date, owns stock possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or any subsidiary or parent of the Company.

6. PERFORMANCE AWARDS.

The Committee may grant Performance Awards which shall be denominated at the time of grant either in shares of Guidant Stock ("Stock Performance Awards") or in dollar amounts ("Dollar Performance Awards"). Payment under a Stock Performance Award or a Dollar Performance Award shall be made, at the discretion of the Committee, in shares of Guidant Stock ("Performance Shares"), or in cash or in any combination thereof, if the financial performance of the Company or any subsidiary, division, or other unit of the Company ("Business Unit") selected by the Committee meets certain financial goals established by the Committee for the Award Period (as defined below). Performance Awards may be granted by the Committee in a manner designed to qualify for exemption under
Section 162(m) of the Code ("Section 162(m) Awards") or in a manner that is not intended to so qualify. The following provisions are applicable to Performance Awards:

(a) Award Period. The Committee shall determine and include in the Grant the period of time (which shall be four or more consecutive fiscal quarters) for which a Performance Award is made ("Award Period"). Grants of Performance Awards need not be uniform with respect to the length of the Award Period. Award Periods for different Grants may overlap. A Performance Award may not be granted for a given Award Period after one half (1/2) or more of such period has elapsed, except as provided in Section 6(g).

(b) Performance Criteria and Payment. Before a Grant is made, the Committee shall establish objectives with respect to designated business performance criteria ("Performance Criteria") that must be met by the Business Unit during the Award Period as a condition to payment being made under the Performance Award. The Performance Criteria and the applicable goals with respect to such criteria shall be set out in the Grant. In the case of Section 162(m) Awards, the Performance

3

Criteria shall be limited to earnings per share, return on assets, return on shareholders' equity, divisional income, net income, total shareholder return, stock price goals, cash flow, operating earnings, return on capital, or economic value added, in each case as may be applied on an absolute or relative to peer group basis. In the case of non-Section 162(m) Awards, the Performance Criteria may include any of the foregoing or any other financial measurement established by the Committee. The Committee shall also set forth in the Grant the number of Performance Shares or the amount of payment to be made under a Performance Award if the Performance Criteria are met or exceeded, including the fixing of a maximum payment, subject to Section 6(f).

(c) Computation of Payment. After an Award Period, the financial performance of the Business Unit during the period shall be measured against the Performance Criteria. If the Performance Criteria are not met, no payment shall be made under a Performance Award. If the Performance Criteria are met or exceeded, the Committee shall certify that fact in writing prior to payment of the Performance Award and shall determine the number of Performance Shares or the amount of payment to be made under a Performance Award in accordance with the Grant for each Grantee. The Committee, in its sole discretion, may elect to pay part or all of the Performance Award in cash in lieu of issuing or transferring Performance Shares. The cash payment shall be based on the fair market value of Guidant Stock on the date of payment. The Company shall promptly notify each Grantee of the number of Performance Shares and the amount of cash, if any, he or she is to receive.

(d) Revisions for Significant Events. At any time before payment is made, the Committee may revise the Performance Criteria and the computation of payment if unforeseen events occur during an Award Period which have a substantial effect on the Performance Criteria and which in the sole discretion of the Committee make the application of the Performance Criteria unfair unless a revision is made; provided, however, that any such revision that would result in an increase in the amount payable under Section 162(m) Awards shall be made only on a non-discretionary basis upon the occurrence of objective events specified in the Grant.

(e) Requirement of Employment. To be entitled to receive payment under a Performance Award, a Grantee who is an employee of the Company must remain in the employment of the Company through the date of the award payment, except that the Committee may provide for partial or complete exceptions to this requirement as it deems equitable in its sole discretion.

(f) Maximum Payment. In case of a Performance Award that is designated as a Section 162(m) Award, no individual may receive Performance Award payments in respect of Stock Performance Awards in excess of 30,000 shares of Guidant Stock in any calendar year or payments in respect of Dollar Performance Awards in excess of $2,000,000 in any calendar year. For purposes of determining the maximum payment under this subsection, payment in cash of all or part of a Stock Performance Award will be deemed an issuance of the number of shares with respect to which such cash payment is made. No individual may receive both a Stock Performance Award and a Dollar Performance Award for the same Award Period.

(g) Section 162(m) Requirements. In the case of a Performance Award that is designated as a Section 162(m) Award, the Committee shall make all determinations necessary to establish the Performance Award within 90 days of the beginning of the Award Period, including, without limitation, the designation of the Participants to whom Performance Awards are made, the Performance Criteria applicable to the Grant and the performance goals that relate to such criteria, and the dollar amounts or number of shares of Guidant Stock payable upon achieving the applicable performance goals. As and to the extent required by Section 162(m) of the Code, the

4

terms of a Section 162(m) Award must state, in terms of an objective formula or standard, the method of computing the amount of compensation payable under the Performance Award and must preclude discretion to increase the amount of compensation payable under the Performance Award.

7. RESTRICTED STOCK GRANTS.

The Committee may issue or transfer shares of Guidant Stock to a Grantee under a Restricted Stock Grant. Upon the issuance or transfer, the Grantee shall be entitled to vote the shares and to receive any dividends paid. The following provisions are applicable to Restricted Stock Grants:

(a) Requirement of Employment. If the employment of a Grantee who is an employee of the Company terminates during the period designated in the Grant as the "Restriction Period," the Restricted Stock Grant terminates and the shares of Guidant Stock must be returned immediately to the Company. However, the Committee may provide for partial or complete exceptions to this requirement as it deems equitable.

(b) Restrictions on Transfer and Legend on Stock Certificate. During the Restriction Period, a Grantee may not sell, assign, transfer, pledge, or otherwise dispose of the shares of Guidant Stock except to a Successor Grantee under Section 11(a). Each certificate for shares issued or transferred under a Restricted Stock Grant shall contain a restricted legend or be held in escrow by the Company until the expiration of the Restriction Period.

(c) Lapse of Restrictions. All restrictions imposed under the Restricted Stock Grant shall lapse (i) upon the expiration of the Restriction Period if all conditions, including those stated in Sections 7(a) and (b) have been met or (ii) as provided under Section
9(a)(ii). The Grantee shall then be entitled to delivery of the certificate.

8. AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION OF THE 1998 PLAN.

(a) Amendment. The Board may at any time and from time to time and in any respect, amend or modify the Plan; provided, however, that no amendment or modification of the 1998 Plan shall be effective without the consent of the Company's shareholders that would: (i) change the class of Eligible Persons under the 1998 Plan, (ii) increase the number of shares of Guidant Stock available for Grants or for Restricted Stock Grants, as provided in Section
4(a), (iii) allow the grant of Stock Options at an exercise price below fair market value, or (iv) allow the re-pricing of Stock Options. In addition, the Board may seek the approval of any amendment or modification by the Company's shareholders to the extent it deems necessary or advisable in its sole discretion for purposes of compliance with Section 162(m) or Section 422 of the Code, the listing requirements of the New York Stock Exchange or for any other purpose. No amendment or modification of the 1998 Plan shall in any manner affect any outstanding Grant without the consent of the Grantee or the permitted transferee of the Grant.

(b) Termination of 1998 Plan. The 1998 Plan shall terminate on May 31, 2007, unless terminated earlier by the Board or unless extended by the Board.

(c) Termination and Amendment of Outstanding Grants. A termination or amendment of the 1998 Plan that occurs after a Grant is made shall not result in the termination or amendment of the Grant unless the Grantee consents or unless the Committee acts under Section 11(e). The termination of the 1998 Plan shall not impair the power and authority of the Committee with respect to outstanding Grants. Whether or not the 1998 Plan has terminated, an outstanding Grant may be terminated or amended under Section 11(e) or may be amended (i) by agreement of the Company and the Grantee consistent with the

5

1998 Plan or (ii) by action of the Committee provided that the amendment is consistent with the 1998 Plan and is found by the Committee not to materially impair the rights of the Grantee under the Grant.

9. CHANGE OF CONTROL.

(a) Effect on Grants. Unless the Committee shall otherwise expressly provide in the agreement relating to a Grant, upon the occurrence of a Change of Control (as defined below):

(i) In the case of Stock Options, each outstanding Stock Option that is not then fully exercisable shall automatically become fully exercisable;

(ii) The Restriction Period on all outstanding Restricted Stock Grants shall automatically expire and all restrictions imposed under such Restricted Stock Grants shall immediately lapse; and

(iii) Each Grantee of a Performance Award for an Award Period that has not been completed at the time of the Change of Control shall be deemed to have earned a Performance Award equal to such Grantee's maximum award opportunity during such Award Period for such Performance Award.

(b) Change of Control. For purposes of the 1998 Plan, a Change of Control shall mean the happening of any of the following events:

(i) The acquisition by any "person," as that term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act (other than (A) the Company, (B) any subsidiary of the Company, (C) any employee or directors' benefit plan or stock plan of the Company or a subsidiary of the Company, or any trustee or fiduciary with respect to any such plan when acting in that capacity, or (D) any person who acquires such shares pursuant to a transaction or series of transactions approved prior to such transaction(s) by the Board of Directors of the Company) of "beneficial ownership" as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act, directly or indirectly, of 20% or more of the shares of the Company's capital stock the holders of which have general voting power under ordinary circumstances to elect at least a majority of the Board of Directors of the Company (or which would have such voting power but for the application of the Indiana Control Share Statute) (Voting Stock);

(ii) the first day on which less than two-thirds of the total membership of the Board of Directors of the Company shall be Continuing Directors (as that term is defined in Article 6(f) of the Company's Articles of Incorporation;

(iii) approval by the shareholders of the Company of a merger, share exchange, or consolidation of the Company (a "Transaction"), other than a Transaction which would result in the Voting Stock of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity) more than 50% of the Voting Stock of the Company or such surviving entity immediately after such Transaction; or

(iv) approval by the shareholders of the Company of a complete liquidation of the Company or a sale or disposition of all or substantially all the assets of the Company.

6

10. ELIGIBLE PERSONS RESIDENT OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES.

The following provisions shall apply to each Eligible Person who is resident outside the United States:

(a) Determination of Eligible Locations. The Committee shall determine whether it is feasible or desirable under local law, custom and practice to make Grants at each location outside the United States. In making this determination as of any Grant Date, the Committee may differentiate among classes of individuals (including expatriates, third country nationals or international assignees) and locations within a particular country.

(b) Special Terms Applicable to Grants. In order to facilitate the making of Grants under this Section 10, the Committee may provide for such special terms for Grants to Grantees who are foreign nationals or who are employed outside the United States as the Committee may consider necessary or desirable to accommodate differences in local law, policy or custom, or to take advantage of special tax or social insurance regimes applicable in a particular jurisdiction. The Committee may approve such supplements, restatements or alternate versions of the Plan as it may consider necessary or desirable for such purposes, without thereby affecting the terms of the Plan as in effect for any other purpose. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Committee may adopt special sub-plans applicable to individuals in particular jurisdictions (e.g., French or U.K. qualified plans), may provide for accelerated vesting with restrictions on the shares received under a Grant, and may condition Grants on acknowledgments or agreements by Grantees tailored to local law.

(c) No Acquired Rights. Nothing in the 1998 Plan or in this Section 10 shall confer upon any individual in any country the right to receive (or to continue to receive) any Grant, any form of Grant or to receive any benefit in lieu of a Grant hereunder, nor to have any special tax treatment apply to any Grant.

11. GENERAL PROVISIONS.

(a) Transfer of Grants. Only a Grantee or his or her authorized legal representative or valid transferee may exercise rights under a Grant. Such persons may not transfer those rights. Except as set forth below, the rights under a Grant may not be disposed of by transfer, alienation, pledge, encumbrance, assignment, or any other means, whether voluntary, involuntary, or by operation of law, and any such attempted disposition shall be void. Notwithstanding the foregoing and solely to the extent permitted by the Committee in an agreement relating to a Grant, rights under a Grant (other than pursuant to an Incentive Stock Option) may be transferred to members of a Grantee's immediate family, charitable institutions, or trusts or partnership whose beneficiaries are any of the foregoing, or to such other persons or entities as may be approved by the Committee, in each case subject to the condition that the Committee be satisfied that such transfer is being made for estate or tax planning purposes or for donative purposes without consideration being received therefor. In addition, when a Grantee dies, the personal representative or other person entitled to succeed to the rights of the Grantee may exercise the rights. A successor to the rights under a Grant pursuant to the foregoing ("Successor Grantee") must furnish proof satisfactory to the Company of his or her right to receive the Grant, whether as a result of a transfer from the Grantee, under the Grantees will or under the applicable laws of descent and distribution.

(b) Substitute Grants. The Committee may make a Grant to an employee of another corporation who becomes an Eligible Person by reason of a corporate merger, consolidation, acquisition of stock or property, reorganization or liquidation involving the Company in substitution for a stock option, performance award, or restricted stock grant granted by such other corporation ("Substituted Stock

7

Incentive"). The terms and conditions of the substitute Grant may vary from the terms and conditions required by the 1998 Plan and from those of the Substituted Stock Incentives. The Committee shall prescribe the exact provisions of the substitute Grants, preserving to the extent the Committee deems practical the provisions of the Substituted Stock Incentives. The Committee shall also determine the number of shares of Guidant Stock to be taken into account under
Section 4.

(c) Subsidiaries. The term "subsidiary" means a corporation of which Guidant owns directly or indirectly 50% or more of the voting power.

(d) Fractional Shares. Fractional shares shall not be issued or transferred under a Grant, but the Committee may pay cash in lieu of a fraction or round the fraction.

(e) Compliance with Law. The 1998 Plan, the exercise of Grants, and the obligations of the Company to issue or transfer shares of Guidant Stock under Grants shall be subject to all applicable laws and regulations and to approvals by any governmental or regulatory agency as may be required. The Committee may revoke any Grant if it is contrary to law or modify a Grant to bring it into compliance with any valid and mandatory law or governmental regulation. The Committee may also adopt rules regarding the withholding of taxes on payment to Grantees.

(f) Ownership of Stock. A Grantee or Successor Grantee shall have no rights as a stockholder of the Company with respect to any shares of Guidant Stock covered by a Grant until the shares are issued or transferred to the Grantee or Successor Grantee on the Company's books.

(g) No Right to Employment. The 1998 Plan and the Grants under it shall not confer upon any Grantee the right to continue in the employment of the Company or affect in any way the right of the Company to terminate the employment of a Grantee at any time, with or without notice or cause.

(h) Foreign Jurisdictions. The Committee may adopt, amend, and terminate such arrangements, not inconsistent with the intent of the 1998 Plan, as it may deem necessary or desirable to make available tax or other benefits of the laws of foreign jurisdictions to Grantees who are subject to such laws.

(i) Governing Law. The 1998 Plan and all Grants made under it shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Indiana, regardless of the laws that might otherwise govern under applicable Indiana conflict-of-laws principles.

(j) Effective Date of the 1998 Plan. The 1998 Plan shall become effective upon approval by the Company's shareholders.

8

EXHIBIT 10.49

GUIDANT CORPORATION

NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION

This Nonqualified Stock Option ("Stock Option") has been granted on ___ (the "Grant Date") by Guidant Corporation, an Indiana corporation (the "Company"), with its principal offices in Indianapolis, Indiana, to


("Grantee").

RECITALS

Under the Guidant Corporation 1998 Stock Plan ("1998 Plan"), the Management Development and Compensation Committee of the Company's Board of Directors (the "Committee") has determined the form of this Stock Option and selected the Grantee, an Eligible Person, to receive this Stock Option under the 1998 Plan. The applicable terms of the 1998 Plan are incorporated in this Stock Option by reference, including the definition of terms contained in the 1998 Plan. In this Stock Option, the term "Company" means Guidant Corporation and its subsidiaries, unless the context requires otherwise.

OPTION

Pursuant to the terms of the 1998 Plan, the Company grants to the Grantee the right to purchase shares of Guidant Stock from the Company by one or more exercises of this Stock Option under the following terms and conditions:

SECTION 1. Number of Shares. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 3, the Grantee may purchase a total of ______ shares of Guidant Stock. This Stock Option is a nonqualified stock option and is not intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code.

SECTION 2. Option Price. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 3, the Option Price shall be $_____ per share of Guidant Stock, which has been determined by the Committee to be the Fair Market Value of Guidant Stock on the Grant Date.

SECTION 3. Adjustments to Number of Shares and Option Price. If any subdivision or combination of shares of Guidant Stock, or any stock dividend, capital reorganization, recapitalization, or consolidation or merger with the Company as the surviving corporation occurs, or if additional shares or new or different shares or other securities of the Company or

-1-

EXHIBIT 10.49

any other issuer are distributed with respect to shares of Guidant Stock through a spin-off, exchange offer, or other extraordinary distribution, the Committee shall make those adjustments it determines appropriate in its discretion, in the number of shares still subject to purchase under this Stock Option or to the Option Price or both. If an adjustment would result in a fractional share, then upon exercise of this Stock Option and payment of the Option Price the Committee may in its discretion either pay cash for the fractional right or round the fraction.

SECTION 4. Option Exercise Period. This Stock Option may be exercised from the Commencement Date to and including the Termination Date ("Option Exercise Period").

The Commencement Date shall be the Grant Date.

The Termination Date shall be the earliest to occur of a., b., c. or d below:

a. ___________,

b. the day of Termination of Employment (as defined below), except by reason of (i) death, (ii) retirement from the Company as a Retired Employee, or (iii) Disability,

c. the corresponding calendar day in the sixtieth month following the day on which the Grantee becomes a Retired Employee, or on which the Grantee's employment is terminated by reason of Disability, or on the last day of that sixtieth month if there is no corresponding day in that month, or

d. the corresponding calendar day in the sixtieth month following the date of death of the Grantee while in the active service of the Company, or on the last day of that sixtieth month if there is no corresponding day in that month.

"Termination of Employment" means the cessation, for any reason, of the relation of employer and employee between the Grantee and the Company. The Committee's determination whether the Grantee's employment has been terminated by reason of Disability or whether a leave of absence constitutes a Termination of Employment shall be final and binding on the Grantee. This Stock Option shall not confer upon the Grantee the right to continue in the employment of the Company or affect in any way the right of the Company to terminate the employment of the Grantee at any time, with or without notice or cause.

A Retired Employee shall be a person whose employment with the Company has terminated upon or after the earliest of (i) the day upon which the person's age plus years of service with the Company, including any predecessor company of the Company, equals 80, and the person is eligible to receive transition benefits under The Guidant Retirement Plan, (ii) the day the person has attained at least 55 years of age and has at least 10 years of service with the Company, including any predecessor company of the Company, (iii) the day the person attains 65 years of age, or (iv) as the Committee otherwise determines.

-2-

EXHIBIT 10.49

SECTION 5. Limitations on Right to Exercise Stock Option. The right to exercise this Stock Option during the Option Exercise Period shall be subject to the following limitations:

a. During the lifetime of the Grantee, only the Grantee or a guardian or legal representative acting for the Grantee under judicial authority may exercise this Stock Option.

b. After the death of the Grantee, this Stock Option may be exercised only by a successor grantee who has become entitled to exercise by will or the laws of descent and distribution and who has furnished proof satisfactory to the Company of his or her right to exercise. The term "Grantee" includes a successor grantee where applicable.

c. The Grantee may not exercise this Stock Option with respect to a fractional share or with respect to less than twenty-five (25) shares of Guidant Stock unless the exercise covers the entire balance of the shares of Guidant Stock subject to purchase. This number is not subject to an adjustment under Section 3.

d. The Grantee's right to exercise this Stock Option and the Company's obligation to issue or transfer shares are subject to all stock exchange requirements, to all applicable laws, and to approvals by any governmental or regulatory agency as may be required.

SECTION 6. Non-Transfer of Stock Option. Neither this Stock Option nor any right under it is transferable except by will or applicable laws of descent and distribution.

SECTION 7. Exercise of Stock Option. The Grantee may exercise this Stock Option by delivering a notice of exercise to the Company's stock option processor, as designated from time to time. The notice of exercise, once delivered, shall be irrevocable. The Option Price shall be paid on or about the time of the notice of exercise, as shall be directed by the Company's stock option processor. The notice of exercise must specify the number of shares of Guidant Stock covered by the exercise and state the number of shares of Guidant stock, if any, being tendered in exchange. Upon receipt of the notice of exercise, the stock option processor shall send to the Grantee a statement of the Option Price, the fair market value of Guidant Stock on the exercise date, the number of shares of Guidant Stock that may be delivered in payment of the Option Price, and the amount of withholding tax due, if any. Shares will be issued or transferred only to the Grantee or the Grantee and another as joint tenants with right of survivorship.

SECTION 8. Ownership of Guidant Stock and Delivery of Certificate. The Committee may, from time to time, establish alternative procedures for paying the Option Price. The Company will not issue or transfer shares of Guidant Stock upon exercise of this Stock Option until the Option Price is fully paid and the Grantee shall have no rights as a shareholder as to shares covered by an exercise until the shares are issued or transferred on the Company's books. At the time the Grantee becomes the owner of the shares covered by the exercise, he or she shall cease to be the owner of any shares tendered in payment of the Option Price.

-3-

EXHIBIT 10.49

SECTION 9. Withholding Tax. Before delivering a certificate for shares of Guidant Stock issued or transferred under this Stock Option, the Company may, by notice to the Grantee, require that the Grantee pay to the Company the amount of federal, state, or local taxes, if any, required by law to be withheld.

SECTION 10. Notices and Payments. Any notices to be given by the Grantee under this Stock Option shall be in writing, and any notice or payment shall be deemed to have been given or made only upon receipt by the Company or the Company's stock option processor at such address as may be communicated in writing to the Grantee from time to time. Any notice or communication by the Company under this Stock Option shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given if mailed or delivered to the Grantee at the address listed in the records of the Company or at such address as specified in writing to the Company by the Grantee.

SECTION 11. Waiver. The waiver by the Company of any provision of this Stock Option shall not operate as, or be construed to be, a waiver of the same or any other provision of this Stock Option at any subsequent time for any other purpose.

SECTION 12. Revocation or Modification of Stock Option. This Stock Option shall be irrevocable except that the Company shall have the right under Section 11(e) of the 1998 Plan to revoke this Stock Option at any time if it is contrary to law or to modify this Stock Option to bring it into compliance with any valid and mandatory law or government regulation.

SECTION 13. Section Headings. The section headings in this Stock Option are for convenience of reference only and shall not be deemed a part of, or germane to, the interpretation or construction of this Stock Option.

SECTION 14. Determinations by Committee. Determinations by the Committee shall be final and conclusive with respect to the interpretation of the 1998 Plan and this Stock Option.

SECTION 15. Change of Control. The provisions of Section 9(a)(i) of the 1998 Plan apply to this Stock Option.

SECTION 16. Rights as a Shareholder. The Grantee or the permitted transferee of this Stock Option shall have no rights as a shareholder with respect to any shares subject to this Stock Option prior to the purchase of such shares by exercise of this Stock Option, except as provided in the 1998 Plan. Nothing in the 1998 Plan or this Stock Option shall create an obligation on the part of the Company to repurchase any shares of Guidant stock purchased hereunder.

SECTION 17. Effective Date. The effective date of this Stock Option shall be the Grant Date.

SECTION 18. Governing Law. The validity and construction of this Stock Option shall be governed by the laws of the State of Indiana.

-4-

EXHIBIT 10.49

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Stock Option to be executed and granted in Indianapolis, Indiana.

GUIDANT CORPORATION

By:

-5-

EXHIBIT 10.50

GUIDANT CORPORATION

RESTRICTED STOCK GRANT

This Restricted Stock Grant ("Restricted Stock Grant") has been granted effective ___ (the "Date of Grant"), by Guidant Corporation, an Indiana corporation, with its principal offices in Indianapolis, Indiana (the "Company"), to


("Grantee")

Upon the Date of Grant, the fair market value of a share of Common Stock of the Company was _______.

RECITALS

Under the Guidant Corporation 1998 Stock Plan ("1998 Plan"), the Company's Management Development and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Committee") has determined the form of this Restricted Stock Grant and selected the Grantee, an Eligible Person, to receive this Restricted Stock Grant and the shares of Common Stock that are subject hereto. The applicable terms of the 1998 Plan are incorporated in this Restricted Stock Grant by reference, including the definition of terms contained in the 1998 Plan.

RESTRICTED STOCK GRANT

In accordance with the terms of the 1998 Plan, the Committee has made this Restricted Stock Grant and concurrently has issued or transferred to the Grantee shares of Common Stock upon the following terms and conditions:

SECTION 1. Number of Shares. The number of shares of Common Stock issued or transferred under this Restricted Stock Grant is _______________.

SECTION 2. Rights of the Grantee as Shareholder. The Grantee, as the owner of the shares of Common Stock issued or transferred pursuant to this Restricted Stock Grant, is entitled to all the rights of a shareholder of the Company, including the right to vote, the right to receive dividends payable either in stock or in cash, and the right to receive shares in any recapitalization of the Company, subject, however, to the restrictions stated in this Restricted Stock Grant. If the Grantee receives any additional shares by reason of being the holder of the shares of Common Stock issued or transferred under this Restricted Stock Grant or of the additional shares previously distributed to the Grantee, all of the additional shares shall be subject to the provisions of this Restricted Stock Grant. Initially, the shares of Common Stock will be held in an account maintained with the processor under the 1998 Plan (the "Account"). At the discretion of the Company, the Company may provide the Grantee with a certificate for the shares, which would bear a legend as described in Section 7.


SECTION 3. Restriction Period. The period of restriction ("Restriction Period") for the shares of Common Stock issued under this Restricted Stock Grant shall commence on the Date of Grant and expire on ____; [provided that the Restriction Period may expire earlier with respect to all or part of the shares if Performance Vesting Criteria as follows are satisfied: _______________. ] In addition, the Restriction Period shall expire earlier as to all shares of Common Stock issued under this Restricted Stock Grant upon the earliest of (i) the date of death of the Grantee, (ii) the date of qualifying disability of the Grantee,
(iii) the date on which the Grantee becomes a Retired Employee (as defined below), or (iv) upon the occurrence of a Change of Control of the Company, as set forth in Section 9 of the 1998 Plan.

A Retired Employee shall be a person whose employment with the Company has terminated upon or after the earlier of (i) the day upon which the person's age plus years of service with the Company, including any predecessor company, equals 80, (ii) the day the person has attained at least 55 years of age and has at least 10 years of service with the Company, including any predecessor company, (iii) the day the person attained 65 years of age or (iv) as the Committee otherwise shall determine.

SECTION 4. Conditions During Restriction Period. During the entire Restriction Period the following conditions must continue to be satisfied:

a. the employment of the Grantee with the Company must not terminate for any reason.

b. the Grantee must not, voluntarily or involuntarily, sell, assign, transfer, pledge, or otherwise dispose of the shares of Common Stock issued or transferred pursuant to this Restricted Stock Grant; and

c. the Grantee must not exercise any appraisal rights with respect to the shares of Common Stock issued or transferred pursuant to this Restricted Stock Grant that are otherwise available under any provisions of the Indiana Business Corporation Law.

For purposes of this Restricted Stock Grant, the Company will determine when employment terminates. A Grantee's employment will not be deemed to have terminated if the Grantee goes on military leave, medical leave or other bona fide leave of absence, if the leave was approved by the Company in writing and if continued crediting of employment is required by applicable law, the Company's policies or the terms of Grantee's leave; provided that vesting dates may be adjusted in accordance with the Company's policies or the terms of Grantee's leave.

SECTION 5. Consequences of Failure to Satisfy Conditions. The following shall be the consequences of Grantee's failure to satisfy the conditions in
Section 4 during the Restriction Period:

a. If the condition in Section 4.a is not satisfied, either by act of the Grantee or otherwise, (i) the Grantee will forfeit the shares of Common Stock

-2-

issued or transferred pursuant to this Restricted Stock Grant, (ii) the Grantee will assign, transfer, and deliver the certificates or any other evidence of ownership of such shares to the Company, (iii) all interest of the Grantee in such shares shall terminate and (iv) the Grantee shall cease to be a shareholder with respect to such shares.

b. Any attempted sale, assignment, transfer, pledge or other disposition of the shares of Common Stock issued or transferred pursuant to this Restricted Stock Grant in violation of the condition in Section 4.b, whether voluntary or involuntary, shall be ineffective and the Company (i) shall not be required to transfer the shares, (ii) may impound any certificates for the shares or otherwise restrict Grantee's account and (iii) hold the certificates until the expiration of the Restriction Period.

c. Any attempted exercise of appraisal rights in violation of the condition in Section 4.c shall be ineffective and the Company may disregard any purported notice of exercise of appraisal rights by the Grantee during the Restriction Period with respect to the shares of Common Stock issued or transferred pursuant to this Restricted Stock Grant.

SECTION 6. Lapse of Restrictions. At the end of the Restriction Period, if the condition specified in Section 4.a has been satisfied during the Restriction Period, all restrictions shall terminate on the related shares, and the Grantee shall be entitled to transfer the shares from the Account or receive certificates without the legend prescribed in Section 7. However, in the event of an attempted violation of the condition specified in Section 4.b, the Company shall be entitled to delay transfers or withhold delivery of any of the certificates if, and for so long as, in the judgment of the Company's counsel, the Company would incur a risk of liability to any party to whom such shares were purported to be sold, transferred, pledged or otherwise disposed.

SECTION 7. Legend on Certificates. Any certificate evidencing ownership of shares of Common Stock issued or transferred pursuant to this Restricted Stock Grant that is delivered during the Restriction Period shall bear the following legend on the back side of the certificate:

These shares have been issued or transferred subject to a Restricted Stock Grant and are subject to substantial restrictions, including but not limited to, a prohibition against transfer, either voluntary or involuntary, a waiver of any appraisal rights, and a provision requiring transfer of these shares to Guidant Corporation (the "Company") without any payment in the event of termination of the employment of the registered owner, all as more particularly set forth in a Restricted Stock Grant, a copy of which is on file with the Company.

At the discretion of the Company, the Company may hold the shares of Common Stock issued or transferred pursuant to this Restricted Stock Grant in an Account as described in Section 2, otherwise hold them in escrow during the Restriction Period, or issue a certificate to the Grantee bearing the legend set forth above.

-3-

SECTION 8. Specific Performance of the Grantee's Covenants. By accepting this Restricted Stock Grant and the issuance and delivery of the shares of Common Stock pursuant to this Restricted Stock Grant, the Grantee acknowledges that the Company does not have an adequate remedy in damages for the breach by the Grantee of the conditions and covenants set forth in this Restricted Stock Grant and agrees that the Company is entitled to and may obtain an order or a decree of specific performance against the Grantee issued by any court having jurisdiction.

SECTION 9. Employment with the Company. Nothing in this Restricted Stock Grant or in the 1998 Plan shall confer upon the Grantee the right to continued employment with the Company.

SECTION 10. Section 83(b) Election. If the Grantee makes an election pursuant to Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code, the Grantee shall promptly (but in no event after thirty (30) days from grant) file a copy of such election with the Company, and cash payment for taxes shall be made at the time of such election.

SECTION 11. Withholding Tax. Before the Company removes restrictions on transfer from the Account or delivers a certificate for shares of Common Stock issued or transferred pursuant to this Restricted Stock Grant that bears no legend or otherwise delivering shares free from restriction, the Grantee shall be required to pay to the Company the amount of federal, state or local taxes, if any, required by law to be withheld ("Withholding Obligation"). Subject to any subsequent Committee determination, the Company will withhold the number of shares required to satisfy any Withholding Obligation, and provide to Grantee a net balance of shares ("Net Shares") unless the Company receives notice not less than five (5) days before any Withholding Obligation arises that Grantee intends to deliver funds necessary to satisfy the Withholding Obligation in such manner as the Company may establish or permit. Notwithstanding any such notice, if Grantee has not delivered funds within fifteen (15) days of after the Withholding Obligation arises, the Company may elect to deliver Net Shares.

SECTION 12. Notices and Payments. Any notice to be given by the Grantee under this Restricted Stock Grant shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given only upon receipt by the Treasurer of the Company at 111 Monument Circle, 29th Floor, Indianapolis, IN 46204, or at such address as may be communicated in writing to the Grantee from time to time. Any notice or communication by the Company to the Grantee under this Restricted Stock Grant shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given if mailed or delivered to the Grantee at the address listed in the records of the Company or at such address as specified in writing to the Company by the Grantee.

SECTION 13. Waiver. The waiver by the Company of any provision of this Restricted Stock Grant shall not operate as, or be construed to be, a waiver of the same or any other provision of this Restricted Stock Grant at any subsequent time for any other purpose.

SECTION 14. Termination or Modification of Restricted Stock Grant. This Restricted Stock Grant shall be irrevocable except that the Company shall have the right under Section 11(e) of the 1998 Plan to revoke this Restricted Stock Grant at any time during the

-4-

Restriction Period if it is contrary to law or modify this Restricted Stock Grant to bring it into compliance with any valid and mandatory law or government regulation. Upon request in writing by the Company, the Grantee will tender any certificates for amendment of the legend or for change in the number of shares of Common Stock issued or transferred as the Company deems necessary in light of the amendment of this Restricted Stock Grant. In the event of revocation of this Restricted Stock Grant pursuant to the foregoing, the Company may give notice to the Grantee that the shares of Common Stock are to be assigned, transferred and delivered to the Company as though the Grantee's employment with the Company terminated on the date of the notice.

SECTION 15. Section Headings. The section headings in this Restricted Stock Grant are for convenience of reference only and shall not be deemed a part of, or germane to, the interpretation or construction of this Restricted Stock Grant.

SECTION 16. Determinations by Committee. Determinations by the Committee shall be final and conclusive with respect to the interpretation of the 1998 Plan and this Restricted Stock Grant.

SECTION 17. Governing Law. The validity and construction of this Restricted Stock Grant shall be governed by the laws of the State of Indiana.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Restricted Stock Grant to be executed and granted in Indianapolis, Indiana.

GUIDANT CORPORATION

By:

-5-

EXHIBIT 10.51

THE GUIDANT EMPLOYEE SAVINGS
AND STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN

January 1, 2003 Restatement


TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                            Page


ESTABLISHMENT AND PURPOSE......................................................1

ARTICLE I.   DEFINITIONS.......................................................2
      1.01.  Definitions.......................................................2

ARTICLE II.  ELIGIBILITY......................................................13
      2.01.  General..........................................................13
      2.02.  Special Status Employees.........................................13
      2.03.  Year of Eligibility Service......................................13
      2.04.  Hour of Service..................................................13
      2.05.  Special Rules for Crediting Hours of Service.....................14
      2.06.  Reemployment.....................................................15

ARTICLE III. NON-ESOP CONTRIBUTIONS...........................................15
      3.01.  Salary Reduction Contributions...................................15
      3.02.  Election of Salary Reduction Contributions.......................15
      3.03.  Limitations on Salary Reduction Contributions....................16
      3.04.  Return of Excess Deferrals and Excess Salary Reduction
             Contributions....................................................18
      3.05.  Nonforfeitability of Contributions...............................20
      3.06.  Employer Contributions...........................................20
      3.07.  Contributions Not Recoverable by Employer........................24
      3.08.  Return of Employer Contributions.................................24
      3.09.  Rollover Contributions...........................................24
      3.10.  Hardship Distributions Under Other Plans.........................25

ARTICLE IV.  LIMITATIONS ON ANNUAL ADDITIONS..................................25
      4.01.  Basic Limitation.................................................25
      4.02.  Definitions......................................................26
      4.03.  Preclusion of Excess Annual Additions............................27
      4.04.  Disposal of Excess Annual Additions..............................27
      4.05.  Other Defined Contribution Plans.................................27

ARTICLE V.   INVESTMENT PROVISIONS............................................27
      5.01.  Investment Options--Salary Reduction Contributions and Rollover
             Contributions....................................................27
      5.02.  Change of Investment Directions..................................28
      5.03.  Failure to Make Investment Direction.............................28
      5.04.  Direction To Invest in Two or More Funds.........................28
      5.05.  Transfers Between Funds..........................................29
      5.06.  Company Stock Fund...............................................29
      5.07.  Trustee's Investment Discretion..................................29
      5.08.  Transferred Participant Loans....................................30

ARTICLE VI.  PARTICIPANTS' ACCOUNTS...........................................30

      6.01.  Separate Accounts................................................30
      6.02.  Accounting for Units Under Investment Funds......................31
      6.03.  Value of Units...................................................32
      6.04.  Units Credited To Participant Accounts...........................32

ARTICLE VII. HARDSHIP WITHDRAWALS FROM SALARY REDUCTION CONTRIBUTIONS
             ACCOUNTS.........................................................32
      7.01.  Withdrawals......................................................32

ARTICLE VIII. WITHDRAWALS FROM NON-SALARY REDUCTION CONTRIBUTION
              ACCOUNTS........................................................34
      8.01.  Voluntary Withdrawals............................................34
      8.02.  Categories of Contributions......................................34
      8.03.  Restrictions Applicable to Participants with Less Than Five
             Years of Service.................................................35
      8.04.  General Provisions Applicable to Withdrawals.....................36

ARTICLE IX.  RESTRICTIONS ON WITHDRAWALS......................................36
      9.01.  Restrictions Upon Number of Withdrawals..........................36
      9.02.  Notice Requirements for Withdrawals..............................36

ARTICLE X.   PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT..........................37
      10.01. Terms of Payment.................................................37
      10.02. Beneficiary and Payment Upon Death...............................44
      10.03. Inability To Locate Payee........................................46
      10.04. Qualified Domestic Relations Orders..............................46

ARTICLE XI. METHODS OF PAYING WITHDRAWALS AND PAYMENTS........................46
      11.01. Payment from Company Stock Fund..................................46
      11.02. Optional Direct Rollover.........................................47

ARTICLE XII. ADMINISTRATION...................................................47
      12.01. Administrative Committee.........................................47
      12.02. Appointment, Resignation, and Organization of Committees.........47
      12.03. Powers and Duties of the Employee Benefits Committee.............49

ARTICLE XIII. TITLE TO ASSETS AND MANAGEMENT OF FUNDS.........................51
      13.01. Fund Advisory Committee..........................................51
      13.02. Trustee..........................................................51

ARTICLE XIV. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.........................................52
      14.01. Nonalienation....................................................52
      14.02. Spendthrift Provision............................................53
      14.03. Nonguarantee.....................................................53
      14.04. Indemnification of Certain Fiduciaries...........................53
      14.05. Payments from the end............................................54
      14.06. Employment Rights................................................55
      14.07. Voting Rights....................................................55
      14.08. Tender Offers....................................................55


                                      -ii-

      14.09. Governing Law....................................................57
      14.10. Merger or Consolidation..........................................57
      14.11. Transfer from Affiliate..........................................57
      14.12. Reorganization...................................................58
      14.13. Loans to Participants............................................58
      14.14. Transfer From Sulzer Medica USA Retirement Plan..................59
      14.15. Transfer From EVT Plan...........................................60
      14.16. Transfer From InControl Plan.....................................61
      14.17. Transfer From CTS Plan...........................................61
      14.18. Transfer From DVI Plan...........................................61

ARTICLE XV.  AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION.........................................61
      15.01. Internal Revenue Approval, ERISA Compliance......................61
      15.02. Modification and Termination.....................................61
      15.03. Termination of Participation by Subsidiaries and Affiliate.......62
      15.04. Distribution on Termination......................................63

ARTICLE XVI. AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS.....................................63

ARTICLE XVII. TOP HEAVY PLAN..................................................63
      17.01. General Rule.....................................................63
      17.02. Top-Heavy Plan...................................................63
      17.03. Definitions......................................................64
      17.04. Requirements Applicable if Plan is Top-Heavy.....................66

ARTICLE XVIII. PAYSOP ACCOUNT.................................................67
      18.01. Transfer of Assets...............................................67
      18.02. Investment In the Company Stock Fund.............................67
      18.03. Withdrawal of PAYSOP Accounts....................................67
      18.04. Distribution of PAYSOP Accounts..................................67
      18.05. Qualified Domestic Relations Orders..............................68

ARTICLE XIX. ESOP PROVISIONS..................................................68
      19.01. Introduction.....................................................68
      19.02. Definitions......................................................69
      19.03. Eligibility......................................................69
      19.04. Employer Contributions...........................................69
      19.05. Payment to Trustee...............................................74
      19.06. Limits on Annual Additions.......................................75
      19.07. Limits on Employer Contributions.................................76
      19.08. Vesting and Forfeitures..........................................77
      19.09. ESOP Accounts....................................................77
      19.10. Payment of Dividends.............................................77
      19.11. ESOP Shares Fund.................................................78
      19.12. Exempt Loan Provisions...........................................79
      19.13. Distribution of ESOP Accounts....................................84
      19.14. Withdrawal and Diversification Rights............................84


                                      -iii-

      19.15. Voting and Tendering of Company Securities.......................85
      19.16. Election Regarding Dividends.....................................85

ARTICLE XX. AMENDMENT OF THE PLAN FOR EGTRRA..................................86
      20.01. Adoption and Effective Date of Amendment.........................86
      20.02. Supersession of Inconsistent Provisions..........................86
      20.03. Limitation on Contributions......................................86
      20.04. Increase In Compensation Limit...................................87
      20.05. Modification of Top-Heavy Rules..................................87
      20.06. Direct Rollovers of Plan Distributions...........................89
      20.07. Rollovers Disregarded in Involuntary Cash-Outs...................89
      20.08. Repeal of Multiple Use Test......................................90
      20.09. Elective Deferrals:  Contribution Limitation.....................90
      20.10. Catch-Up Contributions...........................................90
      20.11. Suspension Period Following Hardship Distribution................90

ARTICLE XXI. MINIMUM DISTRIBUTION REQUIREMENTS................................90
      21.01. General Rules....................................................90
      21.02. Time and Manner of Distribution..................................91
      21.03. Required Minimum Distributions During Participant's Lifetime.....92
      21.04. Required Minimum Distributions After Participant's Death.........92
      21.05. Election of Five Year Rule.......................................94
      21.06. Definitions......................................................94

-iv-

THE GUIDANT EMPLOYEE SAVINGS AND STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN
(2003 Restatement)

ESTABLISHMENT AND PURPOSE

Guidant Corporation (the "Company") hereby amends and restates The Guidant Employee Savings and Stock Ownership Plan ("Plan"), which was originally effective as of January 1, 1995. Except as otherwise specified in the Plan, the effective date of this amendment and restatement is January 1, 2003. The purpose of the Plan is to help the Company's eligible employees, and the eligible employees of its subsidiary and affiliated companies that adopt the Plan, to provide additional security for their retirement by (1) affording those employees the means of making regular savings and (2) providing Employer Contributions invested in stock of Guidant Corporation as an incentive to enhance their individual performance and the performance of Guidant Corporation.

The Plan contains an employee stock ownership plan (the "ESOP"), which is designed to invest exclusively in qualifying employer securities. The non-ESOP portion of the Plan (the "Profit-Sharing Plan") is intended to be a profit-sharing plan that is qualified under Code section 401(a), with a cash or deferred arrangement qualified under Code section 401(k). The ESOP is intended to be a stock bonus plan and an employee stock ownership plan qualified under Code sections 401(a) and 4975(e)(7) and described in ERISA section 407(d)(6). The Profit-Sharing Plan and the ESOP together are designed to constitute a single plan under Treasury Regulation ss. 1.414(1)-l(b)(1). The Plan is also designed to satisfy the requirements of ERISA. The Trust Fund maintained under the Plan is intended to be tax-exempt under Code section 501(a).

Guidant Corporation was previously a wholly-owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly and Company. All of the stock of Guidant Corporation was distributed to the shareholders of Eli Lilly and Company in a tax-free reorganization within the meaning of Code section 368(a)(1)(D). Following adoption of this Plan, employees of Guidant Corporation and its affiliates who were participating in The Lilly Employee Savings Plan had their ESOP and PAYSOP accounts in The Lilly Employee Savings Plan transferred to this Plan. In addition, the Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Employee Savings Plan, the Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. Employee Savings Plan, and the Origin Medsystems, Inc. Employee Savings Plan were merged into this Plan, and all employees who were participating in those plans now participate in this Plan. The Employees' 401(k) Plan of Devices for Vascular Intervention, Inc. will be merged into this Plan as soon as practicable after March 31, 2003. To the extent the accounts of employees who were participating in The Lilly Employee Savings Plan or an affiliate plan were transferred to or merged into this Plan, any beneficiary designation or any other applicable agreement, elections, or consents that participants, spouses, or beneficiaries validly executed under those plans shall be honored by this Plan, to the extent not inconsistent with this Plan and unless otherwise required by law.

The Plan, as amended from time to time, shall be known as "The Guidant Employee Savings and Stock Ownership Plan." The rights to benefits of any employee whose employment terminated prior to the effective date of this restatement or any subsequent


amendment shall be determined solely by the provisions of the Plan in effect at the time of termination of employment, unless the Plan expressly provides otherwise.

ARTICLE I. DEFINITIONS

1.01. Definitions.

(a) The following words and phrases shall have the following meanings unless a different meaning is plainly required by the context:

(1) Base Earnings. The term "Base Earnings" means base pay on, or converted to, a monthly basis, provided that in no event shall base earnings include amounts paid as commissions or sales bonuses. Base earnings shall include base pay that would have been paid to the Participant during the Plan Year in the absence of a salary reduction agreement but are excluded from gross income pursuant to Code section 125, 132(f) or 402(g). For a Participant's initial year of participation in the Plan, Base Earnings will be recognized for the entire Plan Year.

Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, except for purposes of Section 3.01, the Base Earnings of each Participant taken into account under the Plan in any Plan Year shall not exceed $150,000, as adjusted for increases in the limitation pursuant to Code section 401 (a)(17)(B).

(2) Base Earnings Plus Commissions. The term "Base Earnings Plus Commissions" means, with respect to a Participant for a period, the sum of the Participant's Base Earnings for the period plus any amounts paid to the Participant as sales commissions during the period. For this purpose, "sales commissions" means sales commissions (whether revenue based, unity based, or otherwise) and sales bonuses (whether quarterly, monthly, annual, percentage to revenue, unit, or otherwise) to which a Participant is entitled due to the sale of an Employer's products by the Participant. Base Earnings Plus Commissions shall include any Base Earnings or sales commissions that would have been paid to a Participant during a Plan Year in the absence of a salary reduction agreement but are excluded from gross income pursuant to Code section 125, 132(f) or 402(g). For a Participant's initial year of participation in the Plan, Base Earnings Plus Commissions will be recognized for the entire Plan Year.

Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, except for purposes of Section 3.01, the Base Earnings Plus Commissions of each Participant taken into account under the Plan in any Plan Year shall not exceed $150,000, as adjusted for increases in the limitation pursuant to Code section
401(a)(17)(B).

-2-

(3) Board of Directors. The term "Board of Directors" means the Board of Directors of the Company.

(4) Code. The term "Code" means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time, and interpretive rules and regulations.

(5) Company. The term "Company" means Guidant Corporation.

(6) Disabled Employee. The term "Disabled Employee" means an Employee who is unable to perform the material duties of his regular occupation with the Employer in the same salary grade that is commensurate with the Employee's education, training, and experience; provided that the inability results from an injury or illness that requires the Employee to be under the care of a licensed physician; and provided further that the inability is not attributable to intentionally self-inflicted injuries (whether sane or insane), or to active participation in a riot. The term "Disability" means the condition that causes the Employee to become a Disabled Employee.

(7) Employee. The term "Employee" means a person

(A) Who

(i) is a citizen of the United States, but not a resident of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, employed by an Employer, or

(ii) is a citizen or resident of the United States, designated by the Company as an international service employee, employed by a Qualified Subsidiary and as to whom no contributions under a funded plan of deferred compensation are being provided by any person other than the Company with respect to the remuneration paid to such person by the Qualified Subsidiary; and

(B) who receives regular compensation from an Employer or Qualified Subsidiary that the Employer or Qualified Subsidiary initially reports on a federal wage and tax statement (Form W-2); and

(C) who is not a member of a recognized collective-bargaining unit, unless there is a collective-bargaining agreement making the Plan applicable to members of that unit.

(D) The term "Employee" also means a person, who, in addition to meeting the requirement of Section 1.01(a)(7)(C),

-3-

(i) is not a citizen of the United States;

(ii) is not a resident of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico;

(iii) is employed by an Employer or an affiliate (as defined in Section 1.01(a)(26)(A)(ii)); and

(iv) has been selected for participation in the Plan by the Salary Committee of the Company or its designee.

(E) The term "Employee" also means a Leased Employee who is an employee of Eli Lilly and Company providing services to the Company, but does not include any other Leased Employees.

(F) The term "Employee" also means a person who, in addition to meeting the requirement of Section 1.01(a)(7)(C),

(i) is a resident of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico;

(ii) is employed by an Employer and classified as a global service employee; and

(iii) receives regular compensation from the Employer through a payroll in the United States.

(G) The term "Employee" also means a person who, in addition to meeting the requirement of Section 1.01(a)(7)(C),

(i) is not a citizen or permanent resident of the United States;

(ii) is eligible to participate in one or more employee benefit plans maintained by an Employer or Qualified Subsidiary (other than the Plan); and

(iii) receives regular compensation from an Employer or Qualified Subsidiary through a payroll in the United States for services performed in the United States, that the Employer or Qualified Subsidiary initially reports on a federal wage and tax statement (Form W-2).

A person who meets the requirements of Section 1.01(a)
(7)(A)(ii), (B), and (C), or a person who meets the requirements of Section

-4-

1.01(a)(7)(D) and is not employed by an Employer, shall be deemed to be an Employee of the Company for purposes of the Plan.

(8) Employee Benefits Committee. The term "Employee Benefits Committee" means the committee established pursuant to
Section 12.01 to administer the Plan.

(9) Employer. The term "Employer" means the Company and any subsidiary and affiliated company specifically designated by the Board of Directors as such for the purposes of this Plan, provided that the subsidiary or affiliated company adopts this Plan by resolution of its own board of directors. A subsidiary or affiliated company shall cease to be an Employer as of the date on which the subsidiary or affiliated company ceases to be a member of the controlled group (within the meaning of Code section 414(b) or 414(c)) of which the Company is a member.

(10) Employer Contribution. The term "Employer Contribution" means the Minimum Matching Contributions, Additional Matching Contributions, and Basic Contributions that an Employer makes to the Profit-Sharing Plan pursuant to Section 3.06 or to the ESOP pursuant to Section 19.04, any forfeitures that are allocated to Participants' Accounts pursuant to Section 3.06 or 19.04, and any employer contributions made under a Prior Savings Plan that are transferred to or merged into this Plan.

(11) ERISA. The term "ERISA" means the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended from time to time, and interpretive rules and regulations.

(12) Excess Salary Reduction Contribution. The term "Excess Salary Reduction Contribution" means, with respect to any Participant, that portion of the amount that he has elected to have contributed to the Profit-Sharing Plan as a Salary Reduction Contribution pursuant to Section 3.02 but that exceeds the actual deferral percentage limitations described in Section 3.03(a).

(13) Fund Advisory Committee. The term "Fund Advisory Committee" means the committee established pursuant to Section 13.01.

(14) Leased Employee. The term "Leased Employee" means any person who is not an employee of the Company (including, for purposes of this paragraph, an affiliate of the Company) and who provides services to the Company, provided that (i) the services are provided pursuant to an agreement between the Company and any other person ("leasing organization"); (ii) the person has performed the services for the Company on a substantially full-time basis for a period of at least 1 year; and (iii) the services are performed under the primary direction and

-5-

control of the Company; provided that, an individual shall not be considered a Leased Employee of the Company if (i) the employee is covered by a money purchase plan maintained by the leasing organization providing: (1) a nonintegrated employer contribution rate of at least 10 percent of compensation, as defined in Code section 415(c)(3), but including amounts contributed pursuant to a salary reduction agreement which are excludable from the employee's gross income under Code section 125, 132(f),
402(a)(8), 402(h) or 403(b), (2) immediate participation, and (3) full and immediate vesting; and (ii) leased employees do not constitute more than 20 percent of the Company's non-highly compensated workforce.

(15) Normal Retirement Age. The term "Normal Retirement Age" means age 65.

(16) Participant. The term "Participant" means an Employee who has satisfied the requirements of Article IL

(17) Participant's Account. The term "Participant's Account" means the sum of the amounts credited to the Participant at the time of reference in each of the categories listed in Section 6.01.

(A) The portion of a Participant's Account that is attributable to contributions made under the Profit- Sharing Plan, including a Participant's Profit-Sharing Account (or similar account) in a Prior Savings Plan that is transferred to or merged into this Plan, and earnings thereon, shall be referred to as the Participant's "Profit-Sharing Account."

(B) The portion of a Participant's Account that reflects a Participant's interest in the ESOP, including a Participant's ESOP Account (or similar account) in a Prior Savings Plan that is transferred to or merged into this Plan, shall be referred to as the Participant's "ESOP Account."

(C) The portion of a Participant's Account that represents amounts from a Participant's PAYSOP Account (or similar account) in a Prior Savings Plan transferred to or merged into this Plan, and earnings thereon, shall be referred to as the Participant's "PAYSOP Account."

(18) Plan. The term "Plan" means the Guidant Employee Savings and Stock Ownership Plan as modified or amended from time to time as herein provided. The Plan shall comprise both a profit-sharing plan described in Code section 401(a) with a cash or deferred arrangement described in Code section 401(k) (the "Profit-Sharing Plan") and a stock bonus plan and employee stock ownership plan described in Code sections

-6-

401(a) and 4975(e)(7) and section 407(d)(6) of ERISA (the "ESOP"). The ESOP shall be known as the "Guidant Corporation Common Stock Fund."

(19) Plan Fiduciary. The term "Plan Fiduciary" means the following:

(A) The Board of Directors, but only to the extent that the Board of Directors appoints Plan Fiduciaries or performs other functions with respect to the Plan that are identified in ERISA as fiduciary functions. The Board of Directors shall not be a "Plan Fiduciary" to the extent that it makes decisions regarding the design of the Plan or performs other settlor functions with respect to the Plan.

(B) Any Investment Manager appointed pursuant to
Section 13.02(d).

(C) The Employee Benefits Committee and the Fund Advisory Committee.

(D) Any Trustee.

A person or entity shall be a Plan Fiduciary only with respect to the duties allocated to him or it under the terms of the Plan and only to the extent that those duties are identified by ERISA as fiduciary functions.

(20) Plan Year. The term "Plan Year" means the calendar year.

(21) Prior Savings Plan. The term "Prior Savings Plan" shall mean the Lilly Employee Savings Plan, the Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. Employee Savings Plan, the Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. Employees Savings Plan, the Origin Medsystems, Inc. Employees Savings Plan, or the Employees' 401(k) Plan of Devices for Vascular Intervention, Inc., as amended from time to time.

(22) Qualified Subsidiary. The term "Qualified Subsidiary" means a corporation other than an Employer that is either

(A) A foreign corporation not less than ten percent (10%) of the voting stock of which is owned, directly or through one or more subsidiaries, by the Company, but only if the Company has entered into an agreement under Code section 3121(l) or the corresponding provisions of any subsequent revenue law that applies to the foreign corporation and that agreement remains in effect, or,

(B) A domestic corporation not less than 80 percent of the voting stock of which is owned by the Company, 95 percent or

-7-

more of the gross income of which, for the three-year period immediately preceding the close of the taxable year (or for such part of such period during which the corporation was in existence), was derived from sources without the United States, and 90 percent or more of the gross income of which for such period (or such part) was derived from the active conduct of a trade or business.

(23) Retirement. The term "Retirement" or "Retire" means a Participant's termination of employment with the Employer after:

(A) The Participant has attained Normal Retirement Age;

(B) The Participant has attained age 55 and completed ten years of Service; or

(C) With respect to a Participant who is eligible for transition benefits under The Guidant Retirement Plan, the sum of the Participant's full years of age and years of Service equals or exceeds 80.

(24) Rollover Contribution. The term "Rollover Contribution" means a contribution made to the Profit-Sharing Plan pursuant to
Section 3.09.

(25) Salary Reduction Contribution. The term "Salary Reduction Contribution" means a contribution made by an Employer (or, in the case of a Leased Employee treated as an Employee under Section 1.01(a)(7)(E), the contribution made by Eli Lilly and Company) on behalf of an Employee pursuant to Section 3.01 and any salary reduction contributions made under a Prior Savings Plan on behalf of a Participant that are transferred to this Plan.

(26) Service. The term "Service" means employment that is credited under the Plan in accordance with the following rules:

(A) Employers for Whom Service Is Credited. Service means periods of employment with:

(i) an Employer;

(ii) any member of a controlled group of corporations (within the meaning of Code section
414(b), (c), (m), or (o) of which an Employer is a member (hereinafter referred to as an "affiliate");

(iii) a Qualified Subsidiary;

-8-

(iv) any corporation that is a predecessor corporation of an Employer, or a corporation merged, consolidated, or liquidated into an Employer or a predecessor of an Employer, or a corporation, substantially all of the assets of which have been acquired by an Employer, if the Employer maintains a plan of such a predecessor corporation. If the Employer does not maintain a plan maintained by such a predecessor, periods of employment with the predecessor shall be credited as Service only to the extent required under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to Code section
414(a)(2); and

(v) for Participants who began participation in the Plan before January 1, 1996, periods of employment that are counted as Service under a Prior Savings Plan.

(vi) for Participants who began participation in the Plan on January 1, 1998 and who, as of December 31, 1997, were employees of Endovascular Technologies, Inc., periods of employment that counted as service under the 401(k) Savings Plan For Employees of Endovascular Technologies, Inc.

(vii) for Participants who began participation in the Plan on January 1, 1999, and who, as of December 31, 1998, were employees of InControl, Inc., periods of employment that counted as service under the InControl
401(k) Plan.

(viii) for Participants who began participation in the Plan on May 1, 1999, and who, as of April 30, 1999, were employees of Intermedics, Inc., periods of employment that counted as service under the Sulzer Medica USA Retirement Plan.

(ix) for Participants who began participation in the Plan on January 1, 2000, and who, as of December 31, 1999, were employees of CardioThoracic Systems, periods of employment that counted as service under the CardioThoracic Systems 401(K) Savings Plan.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, an Employee may receive credit for periods of employment with an affiliate or predecessor corporation in addition to that which is required under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to Code section 414(a)(2), or for periods of employment with prior employers, provided that the Employee

-9-

Benefits Committee specifically so determines and records its decision in writing.

(B) Periods Credited. An Employee shall receive credit for Service under the Plan from the date he is first credited with an hour of Service to the date his employment is severed. In no event shall an Employee receive credit more than once for the same period of Service. Except as otherwise provided in Section 1.01(a) (26)(F) with regard to leaves of absence, an Employee's employment shall be severed on the earlier of the date on which he Retires, is discharged, resigns, or dies, or the first anniversary of his first date of absence for any reason other than retirement, discharge, resignation, or death. A Disabled Employee's employment shall be severed on the first anniversary of the date on which he becomes disabled.

An Employee shall receive credit for Service, and shall not be deemed to have severed from employment, during, by way of illustration but not by way of limitation, the following:

(i) any period of unpaid leave for military service in the armed forces of the United States required to be credited by law; provided, however, that the Employee returns to employment within the period his reemployment rights are protected by law;

(ii) any period of unpaid family or medical leave required to be credited by law; provided, however, that the Employee returns to employment at the expiration of the leave;

(iii) any unpaid absence from work during which no duties are performed due to the pregnancy of the Employee, the birth of a child of the Employee, the placement of a child with the Employee in connection with the adoption of the child by the Employee or the caring for a child for a period immediately following birth or placement, but only to the extent required by law;

(iv) any other period as specified by the Employee Benefits Committee in writing or as required by law.

(C) Reemployment Within 12 Months. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that an Employee's Service is severed but he is reemployed within the 12 consecutive

-10-

month period commencing on the date of severance, the period of severance shall constitute Service.

(D) Measurement of Service. Service shall be measured in years and days. A period of 365 days of Service shall constitute one Year of Service. All periods of service shall be aggregated for purposes of this Section.

(E) One Year Period of Severance. A one year period of severance shall occur if employment is severed and the Employee is not reemployed within the 12 consecutive month period commencing on the date of severance.

(F) Leaves of Absence. An Employee shall receive credit for Service for all purposes under the Plan during a leave of absence in accordance with the provisions of
Section 1.01(a)(26)(B) and the following rules:

(i) Unpaid Leaves. An Employee shall receive credit for Service under the Plan during the period of an unpaid leave, other than a Special Educational Leave as provided in Section 1.01(a)(26)(F)(iii), only in accordance with Section 1.01(a)(26)(B). The employment of an Employee who fails to return to employment shall be deemed severed, and credit for Service shall cease, as of the first anniversary of the Employee's first date of absence for the leave, unless employment is earlier severed by reason of the Employee's Retirement, discharge, resignation, or death. Where such an Employee's period of leave is authorized to extend beyond the period for which Service is credited under Section 1.01(a)(26)(B), the Employee shall not be deemed to have terminated employment for purposes of payments upon termination of employment under Article X until the date upon which the authorized leave period expires and the Employee fails to return to employment.

(ii) Paid Leaves. An Employee shall receive credit for Service under the Plan during the period of any paid leave of absence. The employment of an Employee who fails to return to employment as of the date specified for the termination of the paid leave shall be severed, and credit for Service shall cease, as of the first anniversary of the date specified for the termination of the leave, unless employment is earlier severed by reason of the Employee's retirement, discharge, resignation, or death. Such an Employee shall be deemed to have terminated employment

-11-

for purposes of payments upon termination of employment under Article X as of the date credit for Service ceases.

(iii) Special Educational Leaves. An Employee who does not return to employment as of the date specified for the termination of the Special Educational Leave shall be governed by the provisions for unpaid leave in
Section 1.01(a)(26)(F)(i). An Employee who returns to employment as of the date specified for the termination of the Special Educational Leave shall receive credit for Service under the Plan for the entire period of the Special Educational Leave.

(G) Crediting of Service for Leased Employees. An individual who is a Leased Employee shall receive credit for Service under the Plan during any period in which the individual is a Leased Employee.

(27) Shares. The term "Shares" means shares of Guidant Corporation common stock.

(28) Split. The term "Split" means September 25, 1995, the date as of which Guidant Corporation ceased to be a member of the controlled group of corporations that includes Eli Lilly and Company.

(29) Trust. The term "Trust" means a trust created by and under any Trust Agreement.

(30) Trust Agreement. The term "Trust Agreement" means an agreement provided for in Article XIII, as that agreement may be modified from time to time.

(31) Trustee. The term "Trustee" means the trustee or the co-trustees under a Trust Agreement and any successor trustee or co-trustees hereafter designated under the terms of any Trust Agreement.

(32) Unit of Participation or Unit. The term "Unit of Participation" or "Unit" means the unit of measure of a Participant's proportionate interest in one of the unsegregated funds described in Article V.

(33) Value Determination Date. The term "Value Determination Date" means the date as of which the value of each Unit in each Fund shall be determined.

(b) Gender. Words used in the masculine gender shall be construed to include the feminine gender, where appropriate, and vice versa.

-12-

ARTICLE II. ELIGIBILITY

2.01. General.

An Employee shall be eligible to participate in the Plan for all purposes upon commencement of employment with an Employer.

2.02. Special Status Employees.

Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 2.01, an Employee who is classified as a special status Employee shall not be eligible to participate in the Plan and to have Salary Reduction Contributions contributed to the Profit-Sharing Plan on his behalf until the first day of the month following his completion of one year of eligibility service. An Employee shall be considered a special status Employee if his employment status is temporary or seasonal, he is a part-time Employee regularly scheduled to work fewer than 20 hours per week, or his employment status is otherwise inconsistent with regular employment status.

2.03. Year of Eligibility Service.

A special status Employee shall be credited with a year of eligibility service at the end of an eligibility computation period if he completes 1,000 hours of service in that eligibility computation period. An eligibility computation period shall be the 12 consecutive month period beginning on the first date on which a special status Employee is employed and completes one hour of service and each 12 consecutive month period thereafter; provided, however, that if the Employee's employment is terminated and during such 12 consecutive month period he does not complete more than 500 hours of service, but he is subsequently reemployed, subsequent eligibility computation periods shall be measured by reference to his date of reemployment.

2.04. Hour of Service.

A special status Employee shall receive credit for 1 hour of service for each hour:

(a) for which the Employee is directly or indirectly compensated by, or entitled to compensation from, any employer described in
Section 1.01(a)(26)(A);

(b) for which back pay, irrespective of mitigation of damages, has been awarded or agreed to by such an employer;

(c) for which he is paid or entitled to payment by such an employer, but during which no duties are performed due to vacation, holiday, illness, incapacity (including Disability), layoff, jury duty or leave of absence; provided, however, that no credit shall be given for periods for which payment is made solely to comply with worker's compensation, unemployment compensation, or disability insurance laws or for payments that solely reimburse an Employee for medical or medically-related expenses incurred by the Employee; and

-13-

(d) during which the Employee is absent from work and during which no duties are performed due to the pregnancy of the Employee, the birth of a child of the Employee, the placement of a child with the Employee in connection with the adoption of the child by the Employee, or the caring for a child for the period immediately following birth or placement.

2.05. Special Rules for Crediting Hours of Service.

Credit for hours of service under Section 2.04 will be provided in accordance with the following special rules:

(a) The number of hours with which an Employee is credited for reasons described in Section 2.04(c) (or the number of hours to which an award of, or agreement to pay, back pay for a period described under that Section applies) shall be determined in accordance with Department of Labor regulations ss. 2530.200b-2; provided, however, that in no event shall more than 501 hours of service be credited for any single continuous period during which the Employee performs no duties but for which he is entitled to credit under Section 2.04(c).

The number of hours with which an Employee is credited for reasons described in Section 2.04(d) shall be the number of hours that normally would have been credited to the Employee but for the absence or, if the Employee Benefits Committee is unable to determine the number of these hours, 8 hours per day of such absence; provided, however, that in no event shall more than 501 hours of service be credited for any single continuous period during which the Employee performs no duties but for which he is entitled to credit under
Section 2.04(d).

(b) Hours of service described in Section 2.04(a) shall be credited to the eligibility computation period in which the duties are performed. The eligibility computation period to which hours of service described in Section 2.04(b) or (c) are credited shall be determined in accordance with Department of Labor regulations ss. 2530.200b-2.

Hours of service described in Section 2.04(d) shall be credited to the eligibility computation period in which an absence described in
Section 2.04(d) begins if, as of the date the absence begins, the Employee has completed less than 501 hours of service; in any other case, those hours shall be credited to the next eligibility computation period.

(c) In addition to credit for hours described in Section 2.04(a), (b), (c), and (d), an Employee shall receive credit for hours of service for any period of military service in the Armed Forces of the United States, and for any period of family or medical leave, required to be credited by law.

(d) during which the Employee is absent from work and during which no duties are performed due to the pregnancy of the Employee, the birth of a child of the Employee, the placement of a child with the Employee in connection with

-14-

the adoption of the child by the Employee, or the caring for a child for the period immediately following birth or placement.

2.06. Reemployment.

A former Participant who is reemployed by an Employer shall be eligible to participate in the Plan again upon the date of his reemployment.

ARTICLE III. NON-ESOP CONTRIBUTIONS

3.01. Salary Reduction Contributions.

(a) Each Participant hired before October 1, 2000, may elect that his Employer shall contribute to the Profit-Sharing Plan on his behalf a Salary Reduction Contribution in an amount equal to a stated whole percentage of his Base Earnings Plus Commissions.

(b) Each Participant hired or rehired on or after October 1, 2000, shall have 3% of his Base Earnings Plus Commissions contributed on his behalf to the Profit-Sharing Plan as Salary Reduction Contributions until and unless he elects, in accordance with the procedures within the time period prescribed by the Employee Benefits Committee, to have a different percentage, or 0%, contributed on his behalf to the Profit-Sharing Plan as a Salary Reduction Contribution. The automatic Salary Reduction Contributions will begin with the first payroll of the first month that begins at least 60 days after the Participant becomes a Participant.

(c) If the Participant is eligible to make a deferral election under The Guidant Excess Benefit Plan-Savings for a Plan Year, the Participant's Salary Reduction Contribution for the Plan Year shall not be more than 16 percent of the Participant's Base Earnings Plus Commissions for the Plan Year. If a Participant is not eligible to participate in The Guidant Excess Benefit Plan--Savings for a Plan Year, the Participant's Salary Reduction Contribution for the Plan Year shall not be more than 75 percent of Base Earnings Plus Commissions for the Plan Year.

(d) Each Participant's Salary Reduction Contributions shall be paid by the Employer to the Trustee no less frequently than monthly, and the Participant's Base Earnings Plus Commissions for that month shall be reduced by an identical amount.

(e) A Participant shall be required to have Salary Reduction Contributions made on his behalf in a Plan Year in order to receive an allocation of Matching Contributions or Additional Matching Contributions.

3.02. Election of Salary Reduction Contributions.

(a) Each Participant electing to have his Employer contribute a Salary Reduction Contribution on his behalf with respect to a Plan Year shall designate

-15-

(at such time and in such manner as prescribed by the Employee Benefits Committee) the percentage of his Base Earnings Plus Commissions (within the limits stated in Section 3.01) to be contributed and authorize the Employer to reduce his Base Earnings Plus Commissions by that amount, to take effect as soon as administratively practicable. A Participant who elects not to have any Salary Reduction Contributions made to the Profit-Sharing Plan on his behalf or who wishes to change the amount of Salary Reduction Contributions made to the Profit-Sharing Plan on his behalf may change his election at any time in accordance with procedures prescribed by the Employee Benefits Committee, to take effect as soon as administratively practicable.

(b) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Plan, a Participant who is credited with Service because of a period of service in the uniformed services of the United States may elect, before or after the period of service, to contribute to the Profit Sharing PIan the Salary Reduction Contributions that would have been made on the Participant's behalf pursuant to Section 3.01 had he remained actively working for an Employer throughout that period of military service ("make-up contributions"). The amount of make-up contributions shall be determined based on the Participant's Base Earnings Plus Commissions immediately prior to the period of military service and the terms of the Plan in effect at that time. Any make-up contributions shall be limited as provided in Section 3.03 with respect to the Plan Year to which the contributions relate rather than the Plan Year in which the make-up contributions are made. Any make-up contributions pursuant to this Section shall be made during the period beginning on the date of reemployment, the duration of which is the lesser of three times the period of absence or 5 years. Investment earnings and losses on make-up contributions shall be credited commencing with the date the contribution is made. Make-up contributions shall be treated as "annual additions" for purposes of Article IV with respect to the Plan Year to which the contributions relate rather than the Plan Year in which they are paid to the trust.

3.03. Limitations on Salary Reduction Contributions.

(a) For Plan Years beginning on or after January 1, 1997, notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, in no event may the Salary Reduction Contributions made on behalf of all eligible highly compensated Employees with respect to any Plan Year result in an actual deferral percentage for that group of Employees that exceeds the greater of (1) or (2) below, where:

(1) is an amount equal to 125 percent of the actual deferral percentage for the Plan Year being tested for all Employees eligible to participate in the Plan other than eligible highly compensated Employees; and

(2) is an amount equal to the lesser of (1) the sum of the actual deferral percentage for the Plan Year being tested for all Employees eligible to participate in the Plan other than eligible highly compensated

-16-

Employees and 2 percent, or (2) 200 percent of the actual deferral percentage for the Year being tested for all Employees eligible to participate in the Plan other than eligible highly compensated Employees.

By the foregoing provision, the Employee Benefits Committee has elected to use the actual deferral percentage for Employees other than highly compensated Employees for the Plan Year being tested rather than the preceding Plan Year, recognizing that the election may not be changed for Plan Years after 1997 except as provided by the Secretary of the Treasury. In determining the actual deferral percentage for a group for a Plan Year, all "eligible Employees" shall be taken into account. For this purpose, "eligible Employee" for a Plan Year is any Employee who is directly or indirectly eligible to make a Salary Reduction Contribution for all or a portion of the Plan Year and includes an Employee who would be eligible to make a Salary Reduction Contribution but did not make any because he failed to make an election pursuant to Section 3.01, his contributions were suspended on account of a withdrawal pursuant to Section 3.10 or 7.01, or because the Salary Reduction Contribution would cause the limitation of Article IV to be exceeded.

(b) For purposes of this Article III, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

(1) "Highly compensated Employee" shall mean, with respect to any Plan Year:

(A) An Employee who performs service for the Company or an affiliate during the Plan Year and is described in one or both of the following groups:

(i) An Employee who is a 5 percent owner, as defined in Code section 416(i)(l)(B), at any time during the Plan Year or the preceding Plan Year; or

(ii) An Employee who received compensation in excess of $80,000 (as adjusted pursuant to Code section
415(d)) during the preceding Plan Year.

(B) For purposes of this definition of highly compensated Employee, the term "compensation" means compensation within the meaning of Code section 415(c)(3), including elective or salary reduction contributions to a cafeteria plan, cash or deferred arrangement, simplified employee pension, or tax-sheltered annuity.

(2) "Actual deferral percentage" with respect to any specified group of Employees for a Plan Year shall mean the average of the actual deferral ratios (calculated separately for each Employee in the group) of

-17-

(A) the amount of Salary Reduction Contributions paid to the Profit-Sharing Plan on behalf of each such Employee for the Plan Year, to

(B) the Employee's compensation, determined using a definition of compensation that is nondiscriminatory within the meaning of Code section 414(s), for the Plan Year or such other period as is permitted under Treasury Regulations ss. 1.401(k)-1(g)(2)(i) (provided that the section 414(s) definition of compensation used and the period over which compensation is determined is applied uniformly to all Employees for the Plan Year).

If any highly compensated Employee is a Participant under two (2) or more qualified cash or deferred arrangements (as defined in Code section 401(k)) of the Employer or an affiliate, for purposes of determining the actual deferral percentage for any such Employee, all such qualified cash or deferred arrangements shall be treated as a single qualified cash or deferred arrangement.

(c) In the event that it is determined prior to the first day of any Plan Year or during the course of any Plan Year that the amount of Salary Reduction Contributions elected by the highly compensated Employees to be contributed to the Profit-Sharing Plan would cause the actual deferral percentage limitations described in Section 3.03(a) to be exceeded, then the Salary Reduction Contribution elected by each highly compensated Employee shall be reduced to the extent necessary to meet such limitations in such manner as the Employee Benefits Committee, in its sole discretion, determines.

(d) Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, a Participant's Salary Reduction Contribution to the Profit-Sharing Plan for any calendar year may not exceed the limitation imposed by Code section 402(g)(1) (as adjusted pursuant to Code section 402(g)(5)), reduced to the extent required by Section 7.01(b)(2)(D).

(e) Notwithstanding the foregoing, the actual deferral percentage limitations described in Section 3.03(a) may be satisfied by combining the Salary Reduction Contributions under the Profit-Sharing Plan with the salary reduction contributions under any other plan maintained by a member of a controlled group of corporations (as defined in Section 1.01(a)(26)(A)(ii)) of which an Employer is a member, to the extent required or permitted under Code section 401(k).

3.04. Return of Excess Deferrals and Excess Salary Reduction Contributions.

(a) If a Participant's elective deferrals (as defined in Code section 402(g)(3)) for the Participant's taxable year under this Profit-Sharing Plan or under any other plan in which the Participant has participated during the taxable

-18-

year exceed the limit imposed by Code section 402(g), the following rules shall apply to such excess deferrals:

(1) Not later than the first February 1 following the close of the taxable year, the Participant may allocate to the Profit-Sharing Plan all or any portion of the Participant's excess deferrals for the taxable year (provided that the amount of the excess deferrals allocated to the Profit-Sharing Plan shall not exceed the amount of the Participant's Salary Reduction Contributions to the Profit-Sharing Plan for the Plan Year ending in the taxable year that have not been withdrawn or distributed), and may notify the Employee Benefits Committee, in writing, of the amount allocated to the Profit-Sharing Plan.

(2) As soon as practicable, but in no event later than the first April 15 following the close of the taxable year, the Profit-Sharing Plan shall distribute to the Participant any excess deferrals allocated to the Profit-Sharing Plan and any income attributable to that amount. The distribution described in this Section 3.04(a)(2) shall be made notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan.

(b) After any excess deferrals (and income attributable thereto) have been allocated to the Profit-Sharing Plan and distributed in accordance with Section 3.04(a), if the actual deferral percentage for the Plan Year of those Participants who are highly compensated Employees exceeds the applicable limit imposed by Section 3.03(a), the amount of the Excess Salary Reduction Contributions (determined in accordance with Code section 401(k)(8)(B)), and any income attributable to those contributions, shall be distributed before the end of the following Plan Year to Participants who are highly compensated Employees, on the basis of the respective portions of the Excess Salary Reduction Contributions allocated to each Participant as described in this Section 3.04(b). The distribution described in this
Section 3.04(b) shall be made notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan. The amount of the Excess Salary Reduction Contributions to be distributed under this Section 3.04(b) for a Plan Year with respect to a Participant shall be reduced by any excess deferrals previously distributed from the Plan to the Participant for the Plan Year.

The amount of Excess Salary Reduction Contributions shall be determined, allocated, and distributed as follows:

(1) First, the actual deferral ratio of the highly compensated Employee with the highest actual deferral ratio shall be reduced to the extent necessary to satisfy the actual deferral percentage test or cause the ratio to equal the actual deferral ratio of the highly compensated Employee with the next highest ratio. Second, this process shall be repeated until the actual deferral percentage ratio test is satisfied.

-19-

(2) The total dollar amount of Excess Salary Reduction Contributions determined under Section 3.04(b)(1) shall be allocated among highly compensated Employees by reducing the Salary Reduction Contributions of the highly compensated Employee with the highest dollar amount of Salary Reduction Contributions until (A) the total amount of the Excess Salary Reduction Contributions have been allocated or (B) his remaining Salary Reduction Contributions are equal in dollar amount to the Salary Reduction Contributions of the highly compensated Employee with the next highest dollar amount. This process shall be repeated until all Excess Salary Reduction Contributions are allocated. The Excess Salary Reduction Contributions allocated to a highly compensated Employee, together with all income attributable to them, shall be distributed to him within one year after the end of the Plan Year for which the contributions were made.

(c) Amounts distributed under Sections 3.04(a) and (b) shall be deemed to have been made from that portion of the Participant's Salary Reduction Contributions not eligible for a Minimum Matching Contribution or for an Additional Matching Contribution, to the extent that the Participant has unmatched Salary Reduction Contributions for the Plan Year. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 3.06(a), in the event that a distribution of matched Salary Reduction Contributions is required, the Minimum Matching Contribution or Additional Matching Contribution amount related to the distributed Salary Reduction Contribution amount shall be forfeited.

3.05. Nonforfeitability of Contributions.

A Participant shall be fully vested at all times in his Salary Reduction Contributions and any accumulated earnings thereon.

3.06. Employer Contributions.

(a) Matching Contributions.

(1) Minimum Matching Contributions. Except as otherwise provided in this Section 3.06, an Employer shall contribute to the Profit-Sharing Plan on behalf of its Employees for each month an amount equal to 50 percent of its Employees' Salary Reduction Contributions for that month; provided, however, that in no event shall Minimum Matching Contributions be made with respect to (1) Salary Reduction Contributions that exceed 6 percent of an Employee's Base Earnings Plus Commissions for the month, (2) Salary Reduction Contributions that exceed the limit set forth in
Section 3.03(d); (3) Excess Salary Reduction Contributions; or
(4) Salary Reduction Contributions attributable to Catch-Up Contributions under Section 20.10. If an Employee's Salary Reduction Contributions stop before the end of a Plan Year because they reached the dollar limitation applicable to the Employee under federal tax law, then his

-20-

Employer shall make a true-up Minimum Matching Contribution on behalf of the Employee for the month in which his Salary Reduction Contributions stop and for each month after that month through the last month of the Plan Year. The true-up Minimum Matching Contribution made for a month shall be equal to the difference, if any, between (A) 50 percent of the Employee's total Salary Reduction Contributions (other than those attributable to Catch-Up Contributions under Section 20.10) for the Plan Year to date that are not in excess of 6 percent of the Employee's Base Earnings Plus Commissions for the Plan Year to date, and (B) the Minimum Matching Contributions previously made for the Participant for the Plan Year (including any true-up Minimum Matching Contributions).

Notwithstanding any of the foregoing, in no event shall Minimum Matching Contributions be made to the extent that those contributions would cause the contribution percentage limit set forth in Section 3.06(d) to be exceeded. An Employer shall make its Minimum Matching Contributions on a monthly basis. The Minimum Matching Contributions made by an Employer on behalf of an Employee participating in the Plan shall be allocated to the Employee's Profit-Sharing Account.

(2) Additional Matching Contributions. In the discretion of the Board of Directors, and except as otherwise provided in this
Section 3.06, each Employer shall make an Additional Matching Contribution to the Profit-Sharing Plan for the Plan Year in an amount, as is determined by the Board of Directors, in proportion to the Salary Reduction Contributions made for the Plan Year on behalf of, or by, their respective Employees who are participating in the Plan as of the first day of the last month of the Plan Year, who Retire during the Plan Year, or who die during the Plan Year while actively employed and participating in the Plan provided, however, that in no event shall Additional Matching Contributions be made with respect to (1) Salary Reduction Contributions that exceed 6 percent of a Participant's Base Earnings Plus Commissions, (2) Salary Reduction Contributions that exceed the limit set forth in Section 3.03(d), above, or (3) Excess Salary Reduction Contributions; (4) Salary Reduction Contributions attributable to Catch-Up Contributions under Section 20.10; and provided further that in no event shall Additional Matching Contributions be made to the extent that such contributions would cause the contribution percentage limit set forth in Section 3.06(d) to be exceeded. An Employer's Additional Matching Contributions for any Plan Year shall become due for payment to the Trustee of the Company Stock Fund on the last day of the Plan Year and shall be paid to the Trustee by the Employer within the period of time prescribed by law to permit a federal income tax deduction with respect to the Plan Year for such contributions. The Additional Matching Contributions made by an Employer on behalf of an Employee participating in the Plan shall be allocated to the Employee's Profit-Sharing Account.

-21-

(b) Basic Contributions. In the discretion of the Board of Directors, and except as otherwise provided in this Section 3.06, an Employer shall contribute to the Profit-Sharing Plan on behalf of each of its Employees participating in the Plan an amount equal to a percentage, determined annually by the Board of Directors prior to the end of each Plan Year, of each Employee's Base Earnings. An Employer shall make its Basic Contributions on a monthly basis. The Basic Contribution made by an Employer on behalf of an Employee participating in the Plan shall be allocated to the Employee's Profit-Sharing Account.

(c) Forfeitures. Forfeitures attributable to Matching Contributions that arise under the Plan shall be allocated to Participants' Profit-Sharing Accounts on the basis of their Salary Reduction Contributions for any Plan Year in which the Employers have elected to make Minimum Matching Contributions and Additional Matching Contributions to the Profit-Sharing Plan rather than to the ESOP. Forfeitures attributable to Basic Contributions shall be allocated to Participants' Profit-Sharing Accounts on the basis of their Base Earnings for any Plan Year in which the Employers have elected to make Basic Contributions to the Profit-Sharing Plan rather than to the ESOP. Forfeitures allocated in this manner shall be treated as Minimurh Matching Contributions, Additional Matching Contributions, or Basic Contributions, whichever is applicable, and shall be allocated to Participants' Profit-Sharing Accounts in the manner described in
Section 3.06(a) or (b), above. The forfeiture allocations described in this Section 3.06(c) shall reduce, dollar for dollar, the amount of the Minimum Matching Contributions, Additional Matching Contributions, or Basic Contributions that otherwise would be allocated to the Participant pursuant to Section 3.06(a) or (b).

(d) Limits on Employer Contributions.

(1) Minimum Matching and Additional Matching Contributions to the Profit-Sharing Plan for any Plan Year shall satisfy the contribution percentage test in Code section 401(m)(2) and the regulations thereunder, including Treasury Regulations ss. 1.401(m)-l(b) or any successor provision. Minimum Matching Contributions and Additional Matching Contributions forfeited by a Participant under Section 3.04(c), above, with respect to a Plan Year shall not be taken into account in determining whether Employer Contributions for that Participant satisfy the contribution percentage test for that Plan Year. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Article III, if the contribution percentage of those Participants who are highly compensated Employees (as defined in Section 3.03) exceeds the limit imposed by Code section 401(m), the following rules shall apply:

(A) The amount of the excess aggregate contributions
(determined in accordance with Code section 401(m)(6)(B))
for the Plan Year, and any income attributable to those contributions, shall

-22-

be distributed (or, if forfeitable, shall be forfeited) before the end of the following Plan Year.

(B) Any distribution in accordance with Section 3.06(d)(1)(A), shall be made to Participants who are highly compensated Employees on the basis of the respective portions of the excess aggregate contributions allocated to each Participant. The total dollar amount of excess aggregate contributions shall be allocated to some or all highly compensated Employees by reducing first the contributions of the highly compensated Participant with the highest dollar amount of contributions until (i) the total amount of excess aggregate contributions has been allocated or (ii) his remaining contributions are equal in dollar amount to the contributions of the highly compensated Employee with the next highest dollar amount. This process shall be repeated until all excess aggregate contributions are allocated.

(2) The determination of the amount of excess aggregate contributions under Section 3.06(d)(1) for any Plan Year shall be made after first determining the excess deferrals under Section 3.04(a), and then determining the Excess Salary Reduction Contributions under Section 3.04(b).

(e) Contributions of Shares. The Employers may, at their election, make all or any part of any mum Matching Contribution, Additional Matching Contribution, or Basic Contribution to the Profit-Sharing Plan in Shares rather than in cash. The Shares so contributed shall have a fair market value equal to the amount of such Minimum Matching Contribution, Additional Matching Contribution, or Basic Contribution (or portion thereof). The fair market value of a Share shall be the mean between the highest and lowest quoted selling price per share for a 100 Share lot on the composite tape of New York Stock Exchange issues on the date of payment to the Trustee.

(f) Contributions to the ESOP. The Employers may, at their election, make a Minimum Matching Contribution, Additional Matching Contribution, or Basic Contribution to the ESOP pursuant to Section 19.04 in lieu of all or a portion of the Minimum Matching Contribution, Additional Matching Contribution, or Basic Contribution otherwise required under this Section 3.06. The amount of the Minimum Matching Contribution, Additional Matching Contribution, or Basic Contribution otherwise required to be made pursuant to this Section 3.06(a) or (b) with respect to a Participant shall be reduced, dollar for dollar, by the value of any Shares (or the amount of any cash) allocated to the Participant's ESOP Account by reason of a Minimum Matching Contribution, Additional Matching Contribution, or Basic Contribution to the ESOP for the Plan Year. The value of the Shares that are allocated to a Member's ESOP Account for any Plan Year shall be determined in accordance with Sections 19.04 and 19.13.

-23-

(g) Deductibility. All Minimum Matching Contributions, Additional Matching Contributions, and Basic Contributions to the Profit-Sharing Plan are conditioned on the deductibility of the contributions under Code section 404 for the taxable year with respect to which the contributions were made.

(h) Qualified Nonelective Contributions. Any Employer who was required to make, but did not make, a Catch-Up Contribution on behalf of an eligible Employee pursuant to Section 20.10 for the 2002 Plan Year, shall make a qualified nonelective contribution ("QNEC") to the Plan on behalf of the Employee by December 31, 2003. The amount of the QNEC shall be equal to the amount of the Catch-Up Contribution that was required to be made, but was not made, plus any positive earnings that would have accrued on the Catch-Up Contribution from the date it was required to be made through the date the QNEC is made to the Plan. The QNEC made on behalf of an Employee shall be allocated to the Employee's Participant's Account and shall be considered a Catch-Up Contribution for all Plan purposes, except that an Employee may not withdraw it solely on account of a hardship.

3.07. Contributions Not Recoverable by Employer. The Trustee shall hold the contributions received by it under Section 3.06 for the respective Participants subject to the provisions of the Plan. No such contribution shall be recoverable by the Employers, except as provided in Section 3.08.

3.08. Return of Employer Contributions.

In the event that an Employer Contribution made pursuant to Section 3.06

(a) is made under a mistake of fact, or

(b) is disallowed as a deduction under Code section 404 for the taxable year with respect to which it was made, the contribution shall, at the option of the Employer, be returned to the Employer within 1 year after the payment of the contribution or the disallowance of the deduction (to the extent disallowed), whichever is applicable. The amount returned shall not be increased to reflect any investment earnings, but shall be decreased to reflect any losses. If the amount returned to the Employer would cause the balance of any Participant's Account to be less than the balance would have been had the returned contribution never been made, the amount to be returned shall be limited to prevent the loss.

3.09. Rollover Contributions.

Subject to the approval of the Employee Benefits Committee and any administrative procedures that the Employee Benefits Committee may prescribe, Rollover Contributions to the Profit-Sharing Plan will be accepted from or on behalf of an Employee that constitute:

(a) all or part of an "Eligible Rollover Distribution" (as defined in Code section 402(c)) from a qualified plan; or

-24-

(b) a distribution from an individual retirement account or annuity described in Code section 408(d)(3)(A)(ii).

Rollover Contributions will not be accepted in a form other than cash. All Rollover Contributions made to the Profit-Sharing Plan on behalf of an Employee shall be allocated to the Rollover Contributions portion of the Employee's Profit-Sharing Account. For purposes of Section 8.02(a), that portion of a Participant's Account attributable to amounts transferred to this Plan from the CardioThoracic Systems 401(K) Savings Plan, that are attributable to that plan, are considered Rollover Contributions.

3.10. Hardship Distributions Under Other Plans.

Notwithstanding anything in this Plan to the contrary, the following provisions shall apply with regard to any Participant who receives a hardship distribution under the Employees' 401(k) Plan of Devices For Vascular Intervention, Inc., the 401(k) Savings Plan For Employees of Endovascular Technologies, the InControl 401(k) Plan, or the CardioThoracic Systems 401(K) Savings Plan:

(a) A Participant's right to elect to have his Employer contribute Salary Reduction Contributions on his behalf to the Profit-Sharing Plan shall be suspended for a period of 12 months after the Participant's receipt of a hardship distribution under the Employees' 401(k) Plan of Devices For Vascular Intervention, Inc., the
401(k) Savings Plan For Employees of Endovascular Technologies, the InControl 401(k) Plan, or the CardioThoracic Systems 401(K) Savings Plan; and

(b) For the Participant's taxable year immediately following the taxable year of the Participant's receipt of a hardship distribution under the Employees' 401(k) Plan of Devices For Vascular Intervention, Inc., the 401(k) Savings Plan For Employees of Endovascular Technologies, the InControl 401(k) Plan, or the CardioThoracic Systems 401(K) Savings Plan, a Participant may not elect to have his Employer contribute Salary Reduction Contributions on his behalf to the Profit-Sharing Plan in excess of the applicable limit under Code section 402(g) for such taxable year less the amount of the Participant's Salary Reduction Contributions in the taxable year of the hardship distribution.

ARTICLE IV. LIMITATIONS ON ANNUAL ADDITIONS

4.01. Basic Limitation.

Subject to the adjustments set forth in this Article IV, the maximum aggregate annual addition to a Participant's Profit-Sharing Account in any limitation year shall in no event exceed the lesser of:

(a) $30,000 (as adjusted to reflect increases in that limitation pursuant to Code section 415(d)); or

-25-

(b) 25 percent of the amount of a Participant's compensation for the limitation year.

4.02. Definitions.

(a) For purposes of Article IV, the term "annual addition" shall mean the sum for any limitation year of the following amounts:

(1) Salary Reduction Contributions;

(2) Employer Contributions to the Profit-Sharing Plan;

(3) Forfeitures if allocated to the Participants' Profit-Sharing Accounts;

(4) Contributions allocated to an individual medical account (within the meaning of Code section 415(1)) that is part of a pension or annuity plan, provided that this Section 4.02(a)(4) shall not be taken into account in applying Sections 4.01(b) and 19.06(a)(2); and

(5) Contributions attributable to post-retirement medical benefits that are allocated to the separate account of a Key Employee (within the meaning of Code section 419A(d)(3)), under a welfare benefit fund (within the meaning of Code section 419(e)) maintained by an Employer; provided that this Section 4.02(a)(5) shall not be taken into account in applying Sections 4.01(b) and 19.06(a)(2).

Amounts allocated to a Participant's ESOP Account shall be treated as annual additions, and shall be subject to the limits on annual additions, to the extent provided in Section 19.06. A Participant's Excess Salary Reduction Contributions (distributed under
Section 3.04(b)) and excess aggregate contributions (distributed or forfeited in accordance with Section 3.06(d)) shall be treated as annual additions; a Participant's excess deferral amounts (distributed in accordance with Section 3.04(a)) shall not be treated as annual additions. A Participant's Rollover Contributions made pursuant to
Section 3.09 shall not be treated as annual additions.

(b) For purposes of this Article IV, the term "compensation" shall mean the Participant's wages within the meaning of Code section 3401 (without regard to any rule under Code section 3401 that limits amounts included in wages based on the nature or location of the employment) and all other payments for which the Employer is required to furnish the Participant with a written statement under Code sections 6041(d) and 6051(a)(3). "Compensation" also includes amounts that would have been paid to the Employee during the Plan Year in the absence of a salary redirection agreement but are excluded from gross income pursuant to Code section 125, 132(f), 457, or 402(g).

-26-

(c) For purposes of this Article IV, the term "limitation year" or "year" means the calendar year.

4.03. Preclusion of Excess Annual Additions.

The Employee Benefits Committee may establish those procedures that it deems necessary and appropriate to monitor compliance with Article IV during a limitation year. If, during the course of a limitation year, the Employee Benefits Committee determines, with respect to a Participant, that no additional contributions may be made and credited to the Participant's Account during the year without exceeding the limitations prescribed in Article IV for the year, then no further contributions shall be made or credited to the Participant's Account during the year.

4.04. Disposal of Excess Annual Additions.

In the event that the limitations with respect to annual additions prescribed in this Section are exceeded with respect to any Participant, the following rules shall apply. If the excess arises as a consequence of the crediting of forfeitures to the Participant's Account, or a reasonable error in estimating the Participant's compensation, the excess shall be held in a suspense account and reallocated among all the Participants' Profit-Sharing Accounts in the limitation year succeeding the year in which the excess arose. If such excess arises as a consequence of a reasonable error in determining the amount of Salary Reduction Contributions that may be made with respect to the Participant, that excess shall be distributed. Distributed excess Salary Reduction Contribution amounts shall be deemed to be unmatched to the extent that the Participant has unmatched Salary Reduction Contributions for the Plan Year; excess Salary Reduction Contributions eligible for a Minimum Matching Contribution or an Additional Matching Contribution shall be distributed only to the extent permitted under the nondiscrimination rules of Code section 401(a)(4).

4.05. Other Defined Contribution Plans.

All defined contribution plans (including voluntary employee contribution accounts in a defined benefit plan and key employee accounts under a welfare benefit plan described in Code section 419, as well as Employer contributions allocated to an IRA) of the Employer (including, for purposes of this Section, an affiliate of the Employer), whether or not terminated, will be treated as one defined contribution plan for purposes of the limitations under Code section 415(c).

ARTICLE V. INVESTMENT PROVISIONS

5.01. Investment Options--Salary Reduction Contributions and Rollover Contributions.

A Participant may at any time or from time to time, by direction to, and in a manner prescribed by, the Employee Benefits Committee, direct that any or all of his Salary Reduction Contributions and Rollover Contributions made after his election becomes effective shall be invested, subject to Section 5.04, in one or more of the investment fund options ("Funds") that the Fund Advisory Committee may designate from time to time by written

-27-

addendum to this Plan. The respective assets of each Fund will be accounted for separately from those of each other Fund and will be invested in the manner prescribed in the Addendum. A Participant may make an investment election with respect to his Rollover Contributions that is separate and different from his investment election with respect to his Salary Redirection Contributions.

The Employee Benefits Committee shall implement a Participant's investment directions in accordance with the terms of this Article V, except that the Committee may decline to implement any investment direction to the extent that the investment direction would, if implemented, result in a transaction (a) that is expressly excluded from protection under ERISA section
404(c), (b) that is a prohibited transaction under ERISA section 406 or Code section 4975, (c) that would generate income that would be taxable to the Plan, or (d) that would otherwise violate applicable federal law.

The Fund Advisory Committee, in its discretion, may change or terminate the existing investment Funds or establish additional investment Funds at any time by amending the written addendum to the Plan. However, any investment Fund that is not an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 shall be managed by an Investment Manager (within the meaning of ERISA section 3(38)) appointed by the Fund Advisory Committee. The selection of investment Fund choices and the administration of Plan investments are intended to comply with the requirements of ERISA section
404(c). To the extent the requirements of ERISA section 404(c) are satisfied, neither the Employee Benefits Committee, the Fund Advisory Committee, the Trustee, nor any other Plan Fiduciary, shall be responsible for any losses resulting from a Participant's individual selection of investment Fund choices.

5.02. Change of Investment Directions.

Subject to such rules as the Employee Benefits Committee from time to time may establish, a Participant may change his direction for the investment of his Salary Reduction Contributions at any time. Any direction by a Participant for the investment of such funds shall be deemed to be a continuing direction until changed by the Participant.

5.03. Failure to Make Investment Direction.

If a Participant fails to give directions to the Employee Benefits Committee for investment of his Rollover Contributions, they shall be invested in the same manner as his Salary Reduction Contributions. If a Participant fails to give directions to the Employee Benefits Committee for investment of his Salary Reduction Contributions, they shall be invested in the Near Term Horizon Portfolio.

5.04. Direction To Invest in Two or More Funds.

If a Participant directs the investment of his Salary Reduction Contributions in more than one of the Funds described in Section 5.01, the amount of the contributions invested monthly in any one Fund shall be not less than 1 percent of his total monthly Salary Reduction Contributions (rounded to the nearest penny).

-28-

5.05. Transfers Between Funds.

Subject to such rules as the Employee Benefits Committee from time to time may establish, a Participant may direct that all or any part of his Units in any one or more of the Funds described in Section 5.01 be converted to Units in one or more of the other of such Funds.

5.06. Company Stock Fund.

(a) Employer Contributions to the Plan shall be invested in a Fund held in Trust and consisting of Shares (commonly known as "the Company Stock Fund"). Except as provided in Sections 5.06(b) and (c), below, a Participant shall not be entitled to have the Employer Contributions that are credited to his Participant's Account and any earnings attributable thereto invested in any Fund other than the Company Stock Fund. The Trustee shall purchase Shares for the Company Stock Fund in the open market or by private purchase, including purchase from the Company. Any such purchase from the Company shall be at a price per share not in excess of the mean between the highest and lowest quoted selling price per share for a 100 Share lot on the composite tape of New York Stock Exchange issues on the date of purchase by the Trustee.

(b) A Participant who has retired shall be entitled to transfer all or a portion of his Participant's Account invested in the Company Stock Fund to one or more of the Funds described in Section 5.01. Similarly, a Beneficiary of a Deceased Participant shall be entitled to transfer all or a portion of the Participant's Account invested in the Company Stock Fund to one or more of the Funds described in
Section 5.01. An election to transfer amounts from the Company Stock Fund to another Fund or Funds shall be made in accordance with Section
5.05. An amount transferred from the Company Stock Fund to another Fund or Funds pursuant to this Section 5.06 shall subsequently be subject to the same rules governing reinvestment as the rules that apply under this Article V to the reinvestment of Salary Reduction Contributions.

(c) A Participant who has attained age 50 and has completed at least 10 Years of Service may diversify his ESOP Account in accordance with Section 19.14(b) of this Plan.

(d) Valuations of Shares that are not readily tradable on an established market will be made by an independent appraiser who meets requirements similar to the requirements of the regulations prescribed under Code section 170(a)(1).

5.07. Trustee's Investment Discretion.

Except for the ESOP Shares Fund under the Company Stock Fund, any Trustee in its sole discretion may, to the extent that it is prudent to do so, maintain all or a part of the assets of any fund in cash or short term government or corporate obligations (other than obligations of an Employer or a Qualified Subsidiary). The Trustee shall not be liable for interest on the part of the assets of any fund that it is authorized to hold in cash pursuant to the authority granted herein.

-29-

The Trustee may maintain the assets of the ESOP Shares Fund in cash only to the extent provided in Article XIX.

Income from investments in each fund shall be reinvested in the same fund.

5.08. Transferred Participant Loans.

To the extent that outstanding Participant loans under a Prior Savings Plan or the Endovascular Technologies, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan, the InControl
401(k) Plan, the Sulzer Medica USA Retirement Plan, or the CardioThoracic Systems 401(K) Savings Plan are transferred to or merged into this Plan, those loans shall be treated as investments of the Profit-Sharing Accounts of the Participant to whom they relate, subject to the terms and conditions of the plan under which they were made. Participant loan repayments shall be invested in accordance with the Participant's investment election currently in effect for Salary Reduction Contributions.

ARTICLE VI. PARTICIPANTS' ACCOUNTS

6.01. Separate Accounts.

The Employee Benefits Committee shall maintain a separate Participant's Account for each Participant, showing separately the following:

(a) Salary Reduction Contributions. The Participant's Salary Reduction Contributions to the Plan, including amounts attributable to salary reduction contributions under a Prior Savings Plan or the Endovascular Technologies, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan, the InControl
401(k) Plan, the Sulzer Medica USA Retirement Plan, or the CardioThoracic Systems 401(K) Savings Plan transferred to or merged into this Plan, and the earnings thereon;

(b) Employee Contributions. The Participant's after-tax employee contributions under a Prior Savings Plan or another qualified retirement plan that are transferred to or merged into this Plan, and any earnings thereon;

(c) Employer Contributions. The Employer Contributions to the Profit-Sharing Plan on behalf of the Participant, including amounts attributable to employer contributions under a Prior Savings Plan or another qualified retirement plan that are transferred to or merged into this Plan, and the earnings thereon;

(d) Rollover Contributions. The Participant's Rollover Contributions to the Plan, including amounts attributable to rollover contributions under a Prior Savings Plan or another qualified retirement plan that are transferred to or merged into this Plan, and the earnings thereon;

(e) ESOP Pre-Split Matching Account. The Participant's ESOP Account under a Prior Savings Plan that is transferred or merged into this Plan, and the earnings thereon;

-30-

(f) Company Matching Account (formerly the ESOP Post-Split Matching Account). The amounts allocated to the Participant by reason of Employer Minimum Matching Contributions and Additional Matching Contributions and Exempt Loan payments under the ESOP, and the earnings thereon;

(g) Retirement ESOP Account (formerly the ESOP Basic Contribution Account). The amounts allocated to the Participant by reason of Employer Basic Contributions and Exempt Loan payments under the ESOP, and the earnings thereon; and

(h) PAYSOP Account. The amounts transferred from the Participant's PAYSOP Account in a Prior Savings Plan that is transferred to or merged into this Plan, and the earnings thereon.

(i) Intermedics Matching Account. The amounts (including both contributions and attributable earnings) transferred from the Participant's Matching Contribution Account in the Sulzer Medica USA Retirement Plan and merged into this Plan.

(j) EVT Qualified Matching Account. The amounts (including both contributions and attributable earnings) transferred from the Participant's qualified matching contribution account in the Endovascular Technologies, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan and merged into this Plan.

A Participant's Profit-Sharing Account shall comprise the amounts described in Section 6.01(a) through (d), above.

A Participant's ESOP Account shall comprise the amounts described in
Section 6.01(e) through (g), above.

A Participant's ESOP Pre-Split Matching Account, Intermedics Matching Account and EVT Qualified Matching Account comprise his Prior Company Account.

6.02. Accounting for Units Under Investment Funds.

In addition to the separate accounting required by Section 6.01, the Employee Benefits Committee shall maintain a separate account for each Participant that shows his proportionate interest in the funds described in Article V. A Participant's proportionate interest in each Fund shall be represented by "Units of Participation," also called "Units." The Employee Benefits Committee shall assign Units of Participation in the Company Stock Fund to any Suspense Account (as defined in Section 19.02(e)) maintained pursuant to
Section 19.12, based on the Suspense Account's proportionate interest in the Company Stock Fund at the time of the determination.

-31-

6.03. Value of Units.

Subject to reasonable materiality standards adopted by the Employee Benefits Committee, the Employee Benefits Committee shall determine the value of a Unit in each Fund on a daily basis. That value will be determined by dividing the sum of uninvested cash and the fair market value of securities (redemption value in the case of United States Savings Bonds and principal plus accrued interest in the case of investment contracts) as determined by the Employee Benefits Committee, by the total number of Units of the Fund.

6.04. Units Credited To Participant Accounts.

The number of Units credited to a Participant under any Fund in each month shall be calculated by dividing the sum of his Salary Reduction Contributions or the Employer Contributions allocated to him under the Fund by the value of the Unit on the last Value Determination Date prior to the date on which the Trustee receives payment of the contributions.

ARTICLE VII. HARDSHIP WITHDRAWALS FROM
SALARY REDUCTION CONTRIBUTIONS ACCOUNTS

7.01. Withdrawals.

A Participant may withdraw a portion of monies accruing from his Salary Reduction Contributions and, if applicable, his salary redirection contributions under the Endovascular Technologies, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan, the InControl 401(k) Plan, the Sulzer Medica USA Retirement Plan or the CardioThoracic Systems 401(K) Savings Plan transferred to this Plan, in accordance with the following rules:

(a) An application for withdrawal shall be made in accordance with procedures prescribed for that purpose by the Employee Benefits Committee.

(b) Hardship withdrawals shall be approved only in those cases where the requirements of Sections 7.01(b)(1) and (b)(2), below, are satisfied.

(1) Hardship withdrawals shall be approved only if needed on account of one of the following:

(A) medical expenses described in Code section 213(d)
incurred by, or amounts necessary to obtain such medical care for, the Participant, the Participant's spouse, or any dependent of the Participant (as defined in Code section 152);

(B) Purchase (excluding mortgage payments) of a principal residence for the Participant;

(C) Payment of tuition, related educational fees, and room and board expenses for the next 12 months of post-secondary education for the Participant or his spouse, children, or dependents (as defined in Code section 152);

-32-

(D) The need to prevent the eviction of the Participant from his principal residence or foreclosure on the mortgage of the Participant's principal residence; or

(E) Payment of funeral expenses incurred by the Participant, the Participant's spouse, or any dependent of the Participant (as defined in Code section 152), provided that the Employee Benefits Committee determines, on a case-by-case basis and in view of all relevant facts and circumstances, that these expenses create an immediate and heavy financial need.

The Employee Benefits Committee may require any and all documentation that it deems necessary, and any such documentation shall be provided by the Participant in a timely fashion. The decision of the Employee Benefits Committee shall be final in all cases.

(2) A hardship withdrawal that satisfies Section 7.01(b)(1) shall be approved only if all of the following requirements also are satisfied:

(A) The withdrawal is not in excess of the amount necessary to discharge the expense (or expenses) listed in
Section 7.01(b)(1) above (plus the reasonably anticipated amount of any tax attributable to the amount of the withdrawal);

(B) The Participant has obtained all distributions, other than hardship distributions, and all nontaxable loans currently available under all plans maintained by the controlled group (as defined in Section 1.01(a)(26)(A)(ii)) of which the Employer is a member;

(C) The Participant's contributions, elective or otherwise, under this Plan and any other plan maintained by the controlled group (as defined in Section 1.01(a)(26)(A)(ii)) of which the Employer is a member, and the Participant's right to make further hardship withdrawals under this Section or withdrawals under Article VIII, shall be suspended for the 12-period following receipt of the withdrawal; and

(D) For the Participant's taxable year immediately following the taxable year of the withdrawal, the limitation set forth in Code section 402(g) shall be reduced for this Plan and all other plans maintained by the controlled group (as defined in Section 1.01(a)(26)(A)(ii)) of which the Employer is a member by the amount of the Participant's elective contributions made under such plans in the taxable year of the withdrawal.

-33-

(3) The amount of the withdrawal shall be deducted from the Participant's Account, and the remaining portion of the Account shall then become the total value of the Participant's Account.

(4) Withdrawals shall be made in cash only. Withdrawals shall be made on a pro rata basis from all the investment Funds described in Section 5.01 in which the Participant's Salary Reduction Contributions are then invested.

(5) In no event shall the amount of the withdrawal exceed 100 percent of (i) the Participant's Salary Reduction Contributions and (ii) any earnings on those contributions accrued prior to January 1, 1989 (less any amount described in this sentence that have been previously withdrawn from the Participant's Account).

(c) A Participant may withdraw monies accruing from his Salary Reduction Contributions Account only after he has withdrawn all amounts that he is eligible to withdraw pursuant to Article VIII.

ARTICLE VIII. WITHDRAWALS FROM NON-SALARY
REDUCTION CONTRIBUTION ACCOUNTS

8.01. Voluntary Withdrawals.

A Participant may, by request in accordance with the procedures prescribed by the Employee Benefits Committee, make withdrawals of his interest under the Plan, other than hardship withdrawals governed by Article VII, upon the conditions specified in this Article VIII.

8.02. Categories of Contributions.

Subject to such rules as the Employee Benefits Committee may from time to time prescribe, a Participant may make a withdrawal in any amount, and such amount may include all or any portion of any of the following categories of contributions; provided, however, that withdrawals shall be deemed to be made in the following order:

(a) First, a Participant may withdraw the portion of his Profit-Sharing Account attributable to Employee Contributions and Rollover Contributions, and earnings thereon, as described in Sections 6.01(b) and 6.01(d);

(b) Second, a Participant may withdraw his vested interest in his PAYSOP Account, and the earnings thereon, as described in Section 6.01(h), to the extent that those amounts accrued prior to June 1, 1998;

(c) Third, a Participant may withdraw his vested interest (determined in accordance with Section 10.01) in the portion of his ESOP Pre-Split Matching Account that is attributable to Employer Contributions, and earnings thereon, as described in Section 6.01(e), to the extent that those amounts accrued prior to June 1, 1998;

-34-

(d) Fourth, a Participant may withdraw his vested interest (determined in accordance with Section 10.01) in the portion of his Company Matching Account that is attributable to Employer Contributions, and earnings thereon, as described in Section 6.01(f), to the extent that those amounts accrued prior to June 1, 1998;

(e) Fifth, a Participant may withdraw amounts from his Intermedics Matching Account, as described in Section 6.01(i), to the extent that those amounts accrued prior to May 1, 1999;

(f) Sixth, a Participant who has attained age 59 1/2 may withdraw his vested interest (determined in accordance with Section 10.01) in the portion of his PAYSOP Account, and the earnings thereon, as described in Section 6.01(h); his vested interest (determined in accordance with Section 10.01) in the portion of his Profit Sharing Account that is attributable to Employer Contributions, other than Basic Contributions made under this Plan, and earnings thereon, as described in Section 6.01(c); his vested interest (determined in accordance with Section 10.01) in the portion of his ESOP Pre-Split Matching Account that is attributable to Employer Contributions, and earnings thereon, as described in Section 6.01(e); and his vested interest (determined in accordance with Section 10.01) and the portion of his Company Matching Account that is attributable to Employer Contributions, and earnings thereon, as described in Section 6.01(f); to the extent that those amounts accrued after May 31, 1998;

(g) Seventh, a Participant who has attained age 59 1/2 may withdraw his vested interest in his Salary Reduction Contributions Account, as described in Section 6.01(a), without regard to hardship; and

(h) Eighth, a Participant who has attained age 59 1/2 may withdraw his vested interest (determined in accordance with Section 10.01) in the portion of his Profit-Sharing Account that is attributable to Basic Contributions made under this Plan, and his Retirement ESOP Account that is attributable to Basic Contributions made under this Plan, as described in Sections 3.06(b) and 3.06(f).

8.03. Restrictions Applicable to Participants with Less Than Five Years of Service.

(a) In no event shall the amount of a withdrawal pursuant to Section 8.01 by any Participant who has completed less than 5 years of Service as of the date of withdrawal include any matching contributions that have not been held in the Trust for at least the 24 month period prior to the date of the withdrawal.

(b) In the event of a withdrawal by a Participant who has completed less than 5 years of Service of the portion of his Participant's Account that is attributable to Employer Contributions, pursuant to Section 8.02(b) or 8.02(c) and prior to 5 consecutive One Year Periods of Severance, the portion of those Employer Contributions that are not withdrawn shall be accounted for separately

-35-

until the Participant incurs 5 consecutive One Year Periods of Severance. The Participant's vested interest in those Employer Contributions at any time shall be the Participant's vested percentage times the sum of the remaining Employer Contributions and all prior distributions of Employer Contributions, minus all prior distributions of Employer Contributions.

8.04. General Provisions Applicable to Withdrawals.

(a) The date on which the Employee Benefits Committee receives a Participant's request for payment shall be the applicable Value Determination Date for the amount that is withdrawn under any paragraph of Section 8.02.

(b) The amount of a withdrawal shall be deducted from the Participant's Account and the remaining portion of that account shall then become the total value of the Participant's Account.

(c) Withdrawals shall be made in cash only, except for withdrawals from the Company Stock Fund under Section 11.01. The withdrawals shall be made on a pro rata basis from all of the investment Funds in which the amounts withdrawn are then invested.

ARTICLE IX. RESTRICTIONS ON WITHDRAWALS

9.01. Restrictions Upon Number of Withdrawals.

(a) Subject to such rules as the Employee Benefits Committee may from time to time prescribe, a Participant may make no more than one (1) withdrawal pursuant to either Article VII or Article VIII in any Plan Year.

(b) If a Participant has a hardship as defined in Section 7.01(b), and the amount available for the Participant to withdraw under Article VIII is insufficient to satisfy the hardship, then for purposes of Section 9.01(a), the Participant shall be treated as taking one withdrawal if he simultaneously requests to withdraw (1) pursuant to Article VIII, the maximum amount available for him to withdraw under that Article; and (2) pursuant to Article VII, the remaining amount required to satisfy the hardship.

9.02. Notice Requirements for Withdrawals.

With respect to withdrawals under Article VII and Article VIII, no less than 30 days and no more than 90 days before the date as of which the withdrawal occurs (or within any other period permissible under applicable law), the Employee Benefits Committee shall furnish the Participant with a general written explanation of the form in which the withdrawal will be made, the effect on his Participant's Account of the Participant's taking such a withdrawal, and any other information the Employee Benefits Committee deems material to the Participant's request. No request for a withdrawal shall be valid unless it is made after receipt of the written explanation. The Participant may waive the requirement that the withdrawal occur at least 30 days after receipt of the written explanation. The Participant's written request for a withdrawal

-36-

shall be deemed to be the Participant's consent to the distribution of the withdrawn amounts and, if applicable, a waiver of the 30 day notice requirement. Distribution of the withdrawal shall be made as soon as practicable after the expiration of the 30-day period following the Participant's receipt of the written explanation or, if applicable, as soon as practicable after the Participant waives the 30-day period.

ARTICLE X. PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT

10.01. Terms of Payment.

(a) General. Upon termination of employment, a Participant, or, in a proper case, his designated beneficiary or legal representative, shall be entitled to payment from his Participant's Account in accordance with the following terms and conditions:

(1) Resignation or Dismissal. Upon resignation or dismissal, a Participant shall be entitled to payment from his Participant's Account as follows:

(A) Amount of Payment. A Participant who resigns or is dismissed from employment and who has completed 5 years of Service as of such date shall be entitled to the entire value of his Participant's Account. A Participant shall always be 100 percent vested in his Rollover Contributions Account. A Participant who has completed less than 5 years of Service shall be entitled to the value of his Salary Reduction Contributions and Employee Contributions to the Plan, plus the value of his salary reduction contributions and qualified matching contributions made under the Endovascular Technologies, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan transferred to this Plan, plus the value of any amounts transferred from the CardioThoracic Systems 401(K) Savings Plan to the Plan, plus his vested interest in the value of the Employer Contributions credited to his Participant's Account. Such vested interest shall be determined by a percentage equal to 20 percent for each full year of Service.

(B) Time and Method of Payment. Subject to Section 10.01(b)(1) and Section 10.01(d), payment shall be made in a lump sum as soon as practicable following the Participant's resignation or dismissal. Notwithstanding Section 8.03(b), any amount in which the Participant is not vested shall be forfeited immediately. Forfeitures arising under the preceding sentence shall be used to reduce Employer Contributions as provided in Section 3.06 or 19.04, or shall be used to reduce administrative expenses as provided in
Section 12.02(n). If a Participant who is less than 100 percent vested is reemployed before the earlier of (i) the date on which he incurs 5 consecutive One Year Periods of Severance, or

-37-

(ii) 5 years after the date of his reemployment, the balance of his Participant's Account as of the date of distribution, unadjusted for any subsequent gains and losses, shall be restored to him. If the present value of any Participant's vested accrued benefit exceeds $5,000, and the Participant does not consent to the distribution, then forfeiture of the Participant's non-vested interest in the value of the Employer Contributions credited to his Participant's Account shall be postponed until the Participant incurs 5 consecutive One Year Periods of Severance.

(C) Valuation of the Participant's Account. The value of a Participant's Account shall be determined as of the date on which the Employee Benefits Committee (or its designee) receives the Participant's request for payment.

(D) Payment Not Treated as Withdrawal. Payment upon termination of employment shall not be treated as a withdrawal for purposes of Articles VII and VIII.

(2) Retirement and Disability. Except as otherwise provided in Section 10.01(b)(1)(B), if the value of a Participant's vested accrued benefit exceeds $5,000, then, upon Retirement or upon becoming a Disabled Employee, the Participant, or his legal representative may elect payment under options (A), (B), or (C) of Section 10.01(a)(3) below, with respect to any portion of his benefit under the Plan that has accrued under this Plan, a Prior Savings Plan, or another qualified retirement plan that has merged into this Plan. The Participant's election of one or more payment options shall be made pursuant to procedures prescribed by the Employee Benefits Committee. Upon becoming a Disabled Employee, Retirement, or death while employed by an Employer, a Participant shall be fully vested in the value of his entire Participant's Account regardless of the number of years of Service he has completed.

(3) Payment Options. Payment upon Retirement or Disability shall be made under one of the following options:

(A) Lump Sum. Payment of the entire Participant's Account with the value of the Participant's Account to be calculated as of the date on which the Employee Benefits Committee (or its designee) receives a Participant's request for payment. Payment under this option (A) may be made at any time not later than the late date of payment permitted by Section 10.01(b)(1).

(B) Installment Payments of All or Part of the Account.

-38-

(i) Substantially equal annual, semi-annual, quarterly, or monthly payments of the value of a specified proportion of Units held at the date of Retirement or Disability, the proportion to be not less than 10 percent per year of the Units held at the date of Retirement or Disability. The value of the specified proportion of the Participant's Account to be paid to the Participant shall be calculated as of the date of each payment.

(ii) Lump-sum payment of any part or all of the value of the Participant's Account, with any balance of the Participant's Account to be paid at later dates. For the purpose of making the initial lump-sum payment under this Section 10.01(a)(3)(B)(ii), the value of the Participant's Account shall be calculated as of the date on which the Employee Benefits Committee (or its designee) receives the Participant's request for payment. For the purpose of making any subsequent payments under this Section 10.01(a)(3)(B)(ii), the value of the Participant's Account shall be calculated as of the date of each payment.

(iii) A Participant who has elected payment under
Section 10.01(a)(3)(B)(i) or (ii), above, may request any number of additional payments during a Plan Year in amounts specified by the Participant. In addition, a Participant who has elected payment under this Section 10.01(a)(3)(B) may elect at any time to accelerate the payment of all remaining payments into a single lump-sum payment. For purposes of making additional or accelerated payments, the value of the Participant's Account shall be calculated as of the date on which the Employee Benefits Committee receives the Participant's request for payment.

(C) Fixed Amount Installment Payments. Substantially equal annual, semi-annual, quarterly, or monthly payments of an amount specified by the Participant, with payments continuing until the Participant's Account is exhausted. A Participant who has elected payment under this Section 10.01(a)(3)(C) may request any number of additional payments during a Plan Year in amounts specified by the Participant. In addition, a Participant who has elected payment under this Section 10.01(a)(3)(C) may elect at any time to accelerate the payment of all remaining payments into a single lump-sum payment. For purposes of making additional or accelerated payments, the value of the Participant's Account shall be calculated as of the date on which the Employee Benefits Committee receives the Participant's request for payment.

-39-

(4) Information Relevant to Payment Options.

(A) Notice. No less than 30 days and no more than 90 days before the date benefits are to commence, the Employee Benefits Committee shall furnish to each Participant who is eligible to receive a distribution under Section 10.01(a)(1) information as applicable regarding: the Participant's right to defer receipt of the distribution, the material features and relative values of the optional forms of benefits under the Plan, and the Participant's right to make (and the effect of) an election to receive benefits in a particular form.

(B) Waiver of Notice. If the distribution is one to which Code sections 401(a)(11) and 417 do not apply, such distribution may commence less than 30 days after the notice required under Treasury Regulation ss. 1.411(a)-11(c) is given, provided that all of the following requirements are satisfied:

(i) The Employee Benefits Committee or its designee clearly informs the Participant that the Participant has a right to a period of at least 30 days after receiving the notice to consider the decision of whether or not to elect a distribution (and, if applicable, a particular distribution option);

(ii) the Participant, after receiving the notice, affirmatively elects the distribution.

(5) Living Trust. A Participant who Retires or who becomes a Disabled Employee as described in Section 10.01(a)(2), may elect that distributions to be made to the Participant shall instead be made directly to a revocable grantor trust (a "living trust"), provided that such election is revocable and is in accordance with such other rules as may be prescribed by the Employee Benefits Committee, and provided that the trustee of the living trust files a written acknowledgment with the Employee Benefits Committee that the living trust has no enforceable right in, or to, any benefit payment that has not yet been made.

(b) Time and Form of Payment.

(1) Time of Payment.

(A) General. Upon termination of a Participant's Service, payment shall be made, or in the case of a payment option requiring periodic payment, payment shall commence, as soon thereafter as practicable; provided, however, that if the present value of any Participant's vested accrued benefit exceeds $5,000, no immediate distribution shall be made without the consent of the

-40-

Participant. Except as provided below, in no event shall payment be made or payments commence later than the "required beginning date."

(i) For purposes of this Section, "required beginning date" means, with respect to a Participant who is not a 5 percent owner as described in Code section 416 and who did not reach 70 1/2 before January 1, 1997, April 1 of the calendar year following the later of (a) the calendar year in which the Participant attains age 70 1/2 or (b) the calendar year in which the Participant retires. With respect to a Participant who is a 5 percent owner as described in Code section 416 or any Participant who reaches age 70 1/2 before January 1, 1997, "required beginning date" means April 1 of the calendar year following the calendar year in which the Participant reaches age 70 1/2.

(ii) Notwithstanding the provisions of this Section, "required beginning date" means, with respect to a Participant's accrued benefit under the Endovascular Technologies, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan transferred to this Plan ("EVT Plan Benefits") or under the Employees' 401(k) Plan of Devices for Vascular Intervention, Inc. transferred to this Plan ("DVI Plan Benefits") with respect to a Participant who is not a 5 percent owner as described in Code section 416 and who did not reach age 70 1/2 before January 1, 2000, April 1 of the calendar year following the later of (a) the calendar year in which the Participant attains age 70 1/2 or (b) the calendar year in which the Participant retires. With respect to a Participant who reaches age 70 1/2 on or after January 1, 1997, but before January 1, 2000, the Participant's "required beginning date" means April 1 of the calendar year following the calendar year in which the Participant reaches age 70 1/2 unless the Participant elects with his spouse's consent to defer commencement of his EVT Plan benefits or his DVI Plan Benefits, whichever is applicable, until a date no later than April 1 of the calendar year following the calendar year in which he retires. With respect to a Participant who is a 5 percent owner as described in Code section 416 or any Participant who reached age 70 1/2 before January 1, 1997, "required beginning date" means April 1 of the calendar year following the calendar year in which the Participant reaches age 70 1/2.

(iii) Further, also notwithstanding the provisions of this Section, "required beginning date" means, with

-41-

respect to a Participant's accrued benefit under the CardioThoracic Systems 401(K) Savings Plan transferred to this Plan ("CTS Plan Benefits"), with respect to a Participant who is not a 5 percent owner as described in Code section 416 and who did no reach age 70 1/2 before January 1, 2002, April I of the calendar year following the later of (a) the calendar year in which the Participant attains age 70 1/2 or (b) the calendar year in which the Participant retires. With respect to a Participant who is a 5 percent owner as described in Code section 416 or any Participant who reaches age 70 1/2 before January 1, 2002, "required beginning date" means April 1 of the calendar year in which the Participant reaches age 70 1/2.

(B) Retirement and Disability. If a Participant's Service terminates as a result of his Retirement or permanent Disability, the Participant may defer payment or the commencement of payments until any day thereafter; provided, that if the Participant wishes to defer payment or commencement of payment beyond his required beginning date as specified in Section 10.01(b)(1)(A), above, the Participant shall withdraw, pursuant to Section 10.01(b)(3), at least an amount sufficient to satisfy the required distribution rules of Code section 401(a)(9) with respect to each year for which such a distribution is required. For purposes of the preceding sentence, a Participant who does not make an affirmative election to commence distribution will be deemed to have elected to defer distribution. Notwithstanding all of the foregoing, if the present value of the Participant's vested accrued benefit does not exceed $5,000, the Participant's vested accrued benefit will be distributed in a lump sum as soon as practicable after termination of Service.

(2) Restriction Relating to Form of Payment. In no event shall any form of payment hereunder provide (i) for payment of benefits over a period longer than the life of the Participant, the lives of the Participant and his beneficiary, the life expectancy of the Participant, or the joint life expectancies of the Participant and his beneficiary, or (ii) for payment of benefits pursuant to any schedule under the Plan unless the schedule satisfies the incidental benefit requirement at Code section 401(a)(9)(G). For purposes of Section 10.01(b)(1)(B)(2)(i), the Participant may elect whether or not his life expectancy and/or the life expectancy of his spouse (but not of any other beneficiary) will be recalculated annually. Notwithstanding any other provisions of the Plan, distributions under the Plan should be made in accordance with Code section 401(a)(9) and the regulations thereunder, including the minimum distribution incidental benefit requirement of proposed Treasury Regulation ss. 1.401(a)(9)-2. With respect to distributions under the Plan made for calendar years

-42-

beginning on or after January 1, 2002, the Plan will apply the minimum distribution requirements of Code section 401(a)(9) in accordance with the regulations under Code section 401(a)(9) that were proposed on January 17, 2001, notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary. This provision shall continue in effect until the end of the last calendar year beginning before the effective date of final regulations under Code section 401(a)(9) or such other date as may be specified in guidance published by the Internal Revenue Service.

(3) Withdrawals Prior to Commencement of Distribution. If a Participant has Retired or become a Disabled Employee and has elected to defer commencement of the distribution of his Participant's Account, the Participant shall be entitled to make withdrawals from time to time from his Participant's Account before the distribution of his Participant's Account commences. For purposes of the preceding sentence, a Participant who has not affirmatively elected to commence distribution will be deemed to have elected to defer distribution. If the beneficiary of a Participant who died while actively employed, or of a Participant who died after Retiring or becoming a Disabled Employee, has elected to defer commencement of the distribution of the vested portion of the Participant's Account pursuant to Section 10.02(a), the beneficiary shall also be entitled to make periodic withdrawals from the vested portion of the Participant's Account before the distribution of the vested portion of the Participant's Account commences. Any withdrawal under this
Section 10.01(b)(3) shall be subject to the rules prescribed in Articles VIII and IX of the Plan; provided, however, that a Participant's withdrawal under this Section 10.01(b)(3) may include Salary Reduction Contributions and earnings thereon, and provided further that neither Section 8.03(b) nor 9.01 shall apply to a withdrawal under this Section 10.01(b)(3). Any withdrawal under this Section 10.01(b)(3) on or after January 1, 2004 may be made during the 60-day period beginning on the date the Participant Retired, became a Disabled Employee or died, whichever is applicable, only if the amount remaining in the Participant's or beneficiary's Plan accounts after the withdrawal is at least $5,000.

(c) Transfer to Affiliate. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 10.01, if a Participant's employment with an Employer is terminated, but he is transferred from employment with an Employer to employment with any affiliate designated by the Employee Benefits Committee, the Participant may elect, in accordance with uniform rules prescribed by the Committee, that his Participant's Account under the Plan shall be transferred by the Trustee to the trust under the savings plan maintained by the affiliate, provided that the affiliate's plan is a plan intended to meet the requirements for qualification under Code section 401(a) and that the trust is a trust intended to be exempt from tax under Code section 501(a).

-20-

(d) Distribution of Benefits to Certain Particinants in Case of Sale or other Disposition of Assets or Stock. A Participant who,

(1) as a result of a sale or other disposition of assets or stock, terminates employment with an Employer or Qualified Subsidiary and immediately becomes employed by, and performs the same or substantially the same duties for, a successor employer (hereinafter, the "Successor Employer") that is not a member of the controlled group of corporations (within the meaning of Code section 414(b), (c), (m), or (o)) that includes the Employer (hereinafter, the "controlled group"), and

(2) is not reemployed by a member of the controlled group upon his termination of employment with the Successor Employer, shall be eligible to receive a benefit pursuant to this Section 10.01, subject to the following rules:

(A) If the Employee has not attained Normal Retirement Age at the time he becomes employed by the Successor Employer, he shall receive any benefit for which he is eligible pursuant to Section 10.01(a)(1) in a lump sum as soon as practicable following his termination of employment with the Successor Employer.

(B) If the Employee has attained Normal Retirement Age at the time he becomes employed by the Successor Employer, he shall receive a benefit pursuant to this Section 10.01; provided that, solely for purposes of determining the time of payment, his termination of employment with an Employer or Qualified Subsidiary shall not be deemed to occur until the date of his termination of employment with the Successor Employer.

10.02. Beneficiary and Payment Upon Death.

(a) Beneficiary. Upon the death of a Participant while actively employed or upon his death after his Retirement, his becoming a Disabled Employee, his resignation, or his discharge, but prior to the receipt of any benefits under the Plan, the vested portion of the Participant's Account, determined as of the date of his death, shall be distributed to his beneficiary. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, if the beneficiary of a deceased Participant is the Participant's spouse, as specified below, such spousal beneficiary, upon filing a written election with the Employee Benefits Committee, may have payment made or payments commence at any date not later than December 31 of the calendar year in which the Participant would have attained age 70 1/2 (or December 31 of the calendar year following the calendar year in which the Participant died, if that is later). All other beneficiaries, upon filing a written election with the Employee Benefits Committee, (1) may have payment made on a date not later than December 31 of the calendar year containing the fifth anniversary of the date of the Participant's death or (2) if the beneficiary is a designated beneficiary as that

-44-

term is described in Code section 401(a)(9)(E), may have payment made or payments commence at any date not later than December 31 of the calendar year following the calendar year in which the Participant died. The value of the Participant's Account shall be determined in such cases as of the date payment is made or payments commence. The sole beneficiary of a Participant who is married on the date of his death shall be the spouse to whom he is then married unless the Participant and his spouse have given their written notarized consent, in accordance with rules prescribed by the Employee Benefits Committee, to the designation of another beneficiary or beneficiaries. The beneficiary or beneficiaries of any other Participant shall be the person or persons designated by the Participant in a written notice filed with the Employee Benefits Committee, in accordance with rules prescribed by the Committee, designating a beneficiary or beneficiaries. A beneficiary may designate his own beneficiary by filing with the Employee Benefits Committee a written notice designating, in accordance with rules prescribed by the Committee, a beneficiary. If a beneficiary who survives the Participant dies before having received all benefits due under the Plan, and the beneficiary has not designated his own beneficiary, then any remaining benefits shall be paid to the estate of the deceased beneficiary. A Participant, but not a beneficiary, may designate a trust as his beneficiary by filing with the Employee Benefits Committee a written notice designating, in accordance with rules prescribed by the Committee, such trust beneficiary; provided, however, that a married Participant may designate a trust as his beneficiary only if the Participant and his spouse have given their written, notarized consent to the designation as specified above.

(b) Change of Beneficiary; Receipt. A Participant may from time to time change or cancel any beneficiary designation; provided, however, that any change or cancellation that diminishes the rights of the person who is the Participant's spouse as of the date that the change or cancellation is purported to be effective shall not be effective without the written consent of the Participant's spouse. No designation or change or cancellation of a designation of beneficiaries shall be effective unless received by the Employee Benefits Committee, in a form satisfactory to it, and in no event shall it be effective before the day of such receipt.

(c) Effect of Designation. The designation of a beneficiary under the Plan, including the deemed designation of a Participant's spouse as his sole beneficiary pursuant to Section 10.02(a), shall be controlling over any testamentary or other disposition. In case of doubt as to the right of any person claiming to be a beneficiary, distribution shall be made to the Participant's surviving spouse; provided, however, that if it is established to the satisfaction of the Employee Benefits Committee that there is no surviving spouse, payment shall be made to the Participant's estate. Any distribution pursuant to the preceding sentence shall discharge the Employee Benefits Committee, the Trustees, the Company, and the Employers from any further liability with respect to distribution of the Participant's Account.

-45-

(d) Form of Payment. If the Participant dies before distribution of his benefits begins, distribution to a beneficiary pursuant to
Section 10.02(a) shall be made in the form elected by the beneficiary from among the options described in Section 10.01(a)(3). Effective December 1, 2003, notwithstanding the preceding sentence, if the value of a Participants vested Account on the Participant's death does not exceed $5,000, distribution to the beneficiary pursuant to Section 10.02(a) shall be made in a single lump sum payment as soon as administratively practicable after the death of the Participant. If the Participant dies after distribution of his benefits has begun, distribution to a beneficiary pursuant to Section 10.02(a) hereof shall be made in the form in which the Participant is receiving distribution at the time of his death or, at the election of the beneficiary, in a lump sum.

10.03. Inability To Locate Payee.

If reasonable efforts have been made during a 12 month period to locate a Participant or beneficiary to whom a distribution is due, and if the Participant or beneficiary cannot be located in spite of these efforts, the Employee Benefits Committee, after the expiration of the 12 month period, may direct that the balance remaining in the Participant's Account be forfeited and allocated to all of the other Participants' Accounts in the manner described in
Section 3.06(c). If the Participant or beneficiary whose Participant's Account is forfeited in accordance with the preceding sentence subsequently makes a valid claim for the Participant's Account, the Participant's Employer shall restore the Participant's Account. The amount restored shall be the value of the Participant's Account as of the date of forfeiture, exclusive of any earnings after that date.

10.04. Qualified Domestic Relations Orders.

Notwithstanding any other provisions of the Plan, in the event that a qualified domestic relations order, as defined in Code section 414(p), is received by the Employee Benefits Committee, benefits shall be payable in accordance with that order and with Code section 414(p). Payment may be made at any time specified in the order, irrespective of whether the Participant has reached the "earliest retirement age" as defined in Code section 414(p).

ARTICLE XI. METHODS OF PAYING WITHDRAWALS AND PAYMENTS

11.01. Payment from Company Stock Fund.

Upon written request made at any time prior to payment, a Participant or former Participant, or, in a proper case, a designated beneficiary or legal representative, may receive payment in cash, or in Shares, or in a combination of any of these, provided that he shall not be entitled to receive in Shares any amount greater in value than the value represented by the Units that are being withdrawn by the Participant from the Company Stock Fund. The value of the Participant's Units in the Company Stock Fund shall be calculated as of the date on which the Employee Benefits Committee receives the Participant's request for payment from the Fund. The Employee Benefits Committee shall direct the Trustee to fulfill any such request, but the Committee may not direct the issuance of partial Shares upon any request.

-46-

This Section 11.01 shall apply to withdrawals under Article VIII and
Section 19.14 and to distributions under Article X and Section 19.13.

11.02. Optional Direct Rollover.

A Participant, a beneficiary who is a surviving spouse of a Participant, or an alternate payee who is a spouse or a former spouse of a Participant, may elect to have any portion of a payment or withdrawal that is an "Eligible Rollover Distribution" as defined in Code section 402(c)(4) paid to an "Eligible Retirement Plan" as defined in Code section 402(c)(8)(B) in a direct rollover; provided that with respect to a beneficiary who is a surviving spouse, an "Eligible Retirement Plan" shall be as defined in regulations issued by the Internal Revenue Service under Code section 402. An election under this Section shall be made in the form and at the time prescribed by the Employee Benefits Committee, shall specify the eligible retirement plan to which the withdrawal amount is to be paid, and shall be subject to such rules as the Employee Benefits Committee may establish.

This Section 11.02 shall apply to withdrawals under Article VII, Article VIII, and Section 19.14 of the Plan, and to distributions under Article X and Section 19.13 of the Plan.

ARTICLE XII. ADMINISTRATION

12.01. Administrative Committee.

The Plan shall be administered by an Employee Benefits Committee that shall consist of not less than 5 nor more than 15 members appointed by the Board of Directors or its designee. The Employee Benefits Committee shall be the "Plan Administrator" for purposes of ERISA.

12.02. Appointment, Resignation, and Organization of Committees.

(a) Employee Benefits and Fund Advisory Committees. The provisions of this Section 12.02 apply to the Employee Benefits Committee established pursuant to Section 12.01 and the Fund Advisory Committee established pursuant to Section 13.01.

(b) Appointed by Board of Directors. The exact number of members of each of the committees, the members thereof, and their respective terms of office shall be designated from time to time by the Board of Directors or its designee.

(c) Acceptance and Resignation. Upon becoming a member of one of the respective committees, the member shall file an acceptance of his appointment in writing with the Board of Directors or its designee and with the Secretary of the committee. Any member of either of such committees may resign by submitting a written resignation to the Board of Directors or its designee and the Secretary of the applicable committee, effective upon the date specified in the instrument of resignation.

-47-

(d) Officers. The Board of Directors or its designee shall appoint for each committee one of its members as Chairman and one of its members as Secretary and may also appoint such other officers as it deems necessary.

(e) Notice to Trustee. The Secretary or an Assistant Secretary of the Company shall, from time to time, notify the Trustee of the appointment of members of the respective committees and of any other person or persons authorized and designated to act on behalf of the respective committees, together with specimens of the signature of each of such persons, and for all purposes hereunder the Trustee shall be conclusively entitled to rely upon the identity and authority of the Secretary or Assistant Secretary and the members constituting the respective committees and of such other person or persons as disclosed by such certificate.

(f) No Compensation. No member of either committee shall receive any compensation for his services as a member.

(g) Manner of Acting. A majority of the members of each committee shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business, and all resolutions or other actions of the committee at any meeting shall be by vote of a majority of those present at the meeting, provided, however, that any action required or permitted to be taken at any meeting of the committee may be taken without a meeting, if prior to the action a written consent thereto is signed by a majority of the members of the committee and the written consent is filed with the minutes of the committee.

(h) Meetings. Each committee shall hold meetings at such time, places, and upon such notice as its members may from time to time determine. Each committee shall maintain accurate records of actions taken at its meetings.

(i) Delegations of Authority by Committee. Either committee may, in its discretion, delegate authority to any other person or persons to act on behalf of the committee, including, without limitation, the right to make any determination or to sign checks, warrants, and other instruments incidental to the operation of the Plan or to the making of any payment specified therein.

(j) Employment of Counsel. Each committee is authorized to employ counsel and such actuarial or clerical services as it may require in carrying out the provisions of the Plan.

(k) Allocation of Responsibilities Between Committees. The committees, by mutual agreement, in writing, may allocate to either of the committees any duty or responsibility that is not expressly assigned to either of the committees by the provisions of the Plan. Any allocation so made shall be fully effective to assign the duty or responsibility to the designated committee as though the allocation had been made expressly by provisions of the Plan.

-48-

(l) Records and Reports. Each committee shall maintain adequate records for accounting valuation purposes and shall deliver to the Company or to all Employers making contributions under the Plan an annual report showing the status of the Fund established pursuant to the Plan.

(m) Standard of Conduct. The members of each committee shall discharge their duties with the care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing that a prudent man acting in a like capacity and familiar with such matters would use in the conduct of an enterprise of a like character and with like aims.

(n) Costs and Expenses. The costs and expenses of administering the Plan, including, but not limited to, legal fees, accountant's fees, reasonable compensation for any Investment Manager and the Trustee, and the expenses of the Fund Advisory Committee and the Employee Benefits Committee in the performance of their duties relating to the operation of the Plan, shall be paid for by the Plan, except to the extent their are paid by the Company. The Fund Advisory Committee may establish guidelines for the allocation of any such administrative costs and expenses to the Fund. Forfeitures that are not allocated to Participants' Accounts or used to repay an Exempt Loan in accordance with other provisions of the Plan shall be used to pay administrative expenses for which the Plan is liable.

12.03. Powers and Duties of the Employee Benefits Committee.

(a) Rules and Rights. Subject to the provisions of the Plan and to such restrictions as the Board of Directors or its designee may adopt, the Employee Benefits Committee may establish rules for the transaction of its business and the administration of the Plan. Subject to such provisions and restrictions, the Employee Benefits Committee shall have the authority to determine, in its complete discretion, all questions relating to the interpretation of the terms and provisions of the Plan and all other questions arising under the Plan or in connection with the administration of the Plan, including without limitation the right to remedy possible ambiguities, inconsistencies, or omissions by general rule or particular decision. All rules, interpretations, determinations, and decisions of the Committee or of the Board of Directors or its designee in respect to any matter or question under the Plan shall be final, conclusive, and binding upon all persons having or claiming to have any interest in or under the Plan including, but not by way of limitation, all Employees, retired Employees, deferred benefit employees, contingent beneficiaries, spouses, dependent children, alternate payees, and any other person. The Committee shall determine Base Earnings, Base Earnings Plus Commissions, years of Service, and years of participation and make any finding of fact necessary for the determination of any right or any benefit payable under the Plan.

-49-

(b) Checking Account. To facilitate payments to Participants who are making withdrawals, the Employee Benefits Committee may establish and maintain one or more checking accounts in the name of the Plan.

(c) Claims Procedures. Each Participant or his beneficiary must claim any benefit to which he believes he is entitled under this Plan in accordance with procedures established by the Employee Benefits Committee.

The Employee Benefits Committee will decide a claim within 90 days of the date on which the claim is filed, unless special circumstances require a longer period for adjudication and the claimant is notified in writing, prior to the expiration of the 90-day period, of the reasons for an extension of time; provided, however, that no extensions will be permitted beyond 90 days after the expiration of the initial 90-day period. If the Employee Benefits Committee fails to notify the claimant of its decision to grant or deny a claim within the time specified by this paragraph, the claim will be deemed to have been denied and the review procedure described below will become available to the claimant.

If a claim is denied, the claimant must receive a written notice stating:

(1) The specific reason for the denial

(2) A specific reference to the Plan provision on which the denial is based;

(3) A description of additional information necessary for the claimant to perfect his claim, and an explanation of why such material is necessary; and

(4) An explanation of the Plan's claim review procedures. The claimant will have 60 days to request in writing a review of the denial of his claim by the Employee Benefits Committee, which shall provide a full and fair review. The claimant may review pertinent documents, and he may submit issues and comments in writing. The decision by the Employee Benefit Committee with respect to the review will be given within 60 days after receipt of the request, unless special circumstances require an extension. In no event will the decision be delayed beyond 120 days after receipt of the request for review. The decision will be written in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant, and it will include specific reasons on which the decision is based and refer to the specific Plan provisions on which the denial is based.

The Employee Benefits Committee shall promulgate such additional rules and procedures for processing claims as it deems advisable or as may be required by regulations issued pursuant to ERISA.

-50-

ARTICLE XIII. TITLE TO ASSETS AND MANAGEMENT OF FUNDS

13.01. Fund Advisory Committee.

A Fund Advisory Committee consisting of not less than 3 nor more than 12 members shall be appointed by the Board of Directors or its designee. In addition to the other responsibilities assigned to it in the Plan, the Fund Advisory Committee shall advise the respective Trustee of the investment objectives of the Trust and of any changes or modifications therein. The foregoing shall not relieve the Trustee from the sole responsibility for the Investment of the Trust Fund under its control. The Fund Advisory Committee shall be responsible for providing investment-related information to Participants and beneficiaries. The Fund Advisory Committee shall be subject to the procedures and rules set forth in Section 12.02.

13.02. Trustee.

(a) Appointment of Trustees. The Fund Advisory Committee shall appoint one or more individuals, banks, or trust companies as Trustees to hold, pursuant to one or more Trusts, all contributions made pursuant to the Plan and all other assets of the Plan. Each Trustee shall serve at the pleasure of the Fund Advisory Committee and shall have such rights, powers, and duties as are contained in the Trust Agreement by which it or he is appointed, and as the same may be amended.

Execution of the Trust Agreement by the Trustee shall be evidence of the Trustee's acceptance of its fiduciary capacity with respect to the Fund created by the applicable Trust Agreement to the allocation of fiduciary responsibilities, obligations, and duties contained in the Plan and the applicable Trust Agreement.

(b) Management of Assets. All assets of the Plan shall be held in trust by the Trustee for use in providing the benefits of the Plan. Each Trustee shall have the sole responsibility, subject to Section 13.02(d), for the investment of the funds held pursuant to the applicable Trust. In the event that a contribution by an Employer is made under circumstances described in Section 3.08, the Employer shall be entitled to have the contribution returned on the conditions stated in the Section. In addition, the proceeds of an Exempt Loan (or Financed Shares purchased with such proceeds), and earnings thereon, may be used to repay an Exempt Loan under the circumstances described in Article X1X. Except as provided in the preceding two sentences, no part of the corpus or income of any Trust shall be used for or diverted to purposes other than the exclusive benefit of Participants, retired Participants, and spouses and other beneficiaries of the Participants under the Plan.

(c) Investment Standards. All contributions made under this Plan shall be delivered to the Trustee and shall be held, invested, and reinvested as hereinafter set forth and in accordance with the provisions of the Trust Agreement. Investments shall consist only of those in which a prudent man familiar with the objectives of the Plan and using care, skill, prudence, and

-51-

diligence would invest in the conduct of an enterprise of a like character and with like aims, diversifying the investments so as to minimize the risk of market losses; provided, however, that investment in the Company Stock Fund as provided by the Plan may be made without any limitation on the percentage of the total fair market value of the trust fund or any Participant's Account that is so invested.

(d) Investment Responsibility. Each Trustee shall have sole responsibility for investment of the applicable Trust unless the Fund Advisory Committee appoints an Investment Manager and allocates control and management of all or any portion of the assets held in the Trust to the Investment Manager. The Investment Manager shall be an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, a bank as defined in that Act, or an insurance company that is qualified to manage the assets of employee benefit plans under the laws of more than one state. An Investment Manager shall acknowledge in writing its appointment as a fiduciary of the Plan and shall serve until a proper resignation is receivell by the Fund Advisory Committee, or until it is removed or replaced by the Fund Advisory Committee.

(e) Responsibility of Investment Manager. An Investment Manager shall have sole investment responsibility for that portion of the assets of the Plan that it has been appointed to manage, and no other Plan Fiduciary or any Trustee shall have any responsibility for the investment of any of the assets, the management of which has been delegated to an Investment Manager, or liability for any loss to, or diminution in value of, the assets of the Plan resulting from any action directed, taken, or omitted by an Investment Manager. The Board of Directors, the committees, and the Trustee shall be under no duty to question the direction or lack of direction of any Investment Manager, but shall act, and shall be fully protected in acting, in accordance with each such direction. The investment responsibility of an Investment Manager shall not include responsibility for lending securities held in one or more of the Funds.

(f) Securities Lending. The right to lend securities, if any, in each of the Funds is expressly reserved to the Trustee that is the custodian of the Fund or portion thereof. The Trustee may, with the consent of the Fund Advisory Committee, lend securities held in one or more of the Funds.

ARTICLE XIV. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

14.01. Nonalienation.

No Employee, retired Employee, or other person shall have any right or power, by draft, assignment, or otherwise, to mortgage, pledge, or otherwise encumber in advance any interest in or portion of the assets held pursuant to any Trust or to give any order in advance upon any Trustee therefore and every attempted draft, assignment, or other disposition thereof shall be absolutely void except to the extent permitted under Code section 401(a)(13) and the regulations thereunder.

-52-

14.02. Spendthrift Provision.

Except as otherwise provided in this Section, the funds held pursuant to any Trust shall not be liable in any way, whether by process of law or otherwise, for the debts or other obligations of any Employee, retired Employee, or other person. Unless expressly permitted by this Section benefits payable under this Plan shall not be subject, in any manner, to anticipation, alienation, sale, transfer, or assignment by the Employee, and any attempt to do so shall be void. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Plan Fiduciaries are expressly authorized to comply with a qualified domestic relations order pursuant to Section 10.04; to permit the use of Participant's Account as security for a loan pursuant to Section 14.13; and to off-set a Participant's Accounts against an amount that the Participant is ordered or required to pay to the Plan pursuant to Code section 401(a)(13)(C).

14.03. Nonguarantee.

Plan Fiduciaries; Employers; and employees, officers, and directors of the Employers and the Plan Fiduciaries, shall not be held or deemed in any manner to guarantee the Plan against loss or depreciation.

14.04. Indemnification of Certain Fiduciaries.

(a) Persons Entitled to Indemnification. Any person who is a member of the Employee Benefits Committee, the Fund Advisory Committee, the Board of Directors, and any employee of the Company or of any subsidiary or affiliated company who acts in a fiduciary capacity or any other capacity pursuant to the terms of the Plan, shall be indemnified by the Company against any and all liability and reasonable expense that may be incurred by either of them in connection with, or resulting from, any claim, action, suit, or proceeding (whether actual or threatened; civil, criminal, administrative, or investigative; or in connection with any appeal relating thereto) in which any of such persons may become involved as a party or otherwise by reason of acting in a fiduciary capacity or by reason of any action taken or not taken in such capacity whether or not such person continued to be a fiduciary at the time such liability or expense is incurred; provided such person acted in good faith, in what he reasonably believed to have been in the best interest of the Plan or the Employers, as the case may be, and, in addition, in any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was unlawful.

(b) Definition. As used in this Section 14.04, the terms "liability" and "expense" shall include, but shall not be limited to, attorneys' fees and disbursements, and amounts of judgments, fines, or penalties against, and amounts paid in settlement by, such persons.

(c) Effect of Termination of Proceeding. The termination of any claim, action, suit, or proceeding, civil or criminal, by judgment, settlement (whether with or without court approval), or conviction, or upon a plea of guilty

-53-

or of nolo contendere, or its equivalent, shall not create a presumption that the person did not meet the standards of conduct set forth in Section 14.04(a).

(d) Persons Successful on the Merits. Any person described in
Section 14.04(a), who has been wholly successful, on the merits or otherwise, with respect to any claim, action, suit, or proceeding of the character described therein shall be entitled to indemnification as of right.

(e) Persons Not Successful on the Merits. Except as provided in
Section 14.04(d), any indemnification hereunder shall be made at the discretion of the Company, but only if (i) the Board of Directors, acting by a quorum consisting of directors who are not parties to, or who have been wholly successful with respect to, such claim, action, suit, or proceeding, shall find that the director, officer, or employee has met the standards of conduct set forth in Section 14.04(a) or (ii) independent legal counsel (who may be regular counsel of the Company) shall deliver to it their written opinion that the person has met those standards.

(f) Indemnification on Less Than All Claims or Issues. If several claims, issues, or matters of action are involved, any such person may be entitled to indemnification as to some matters even though he is not so entitled as to others.

(g) Advance of Costs. The Company may advance expenses to, or where appropriate may, at its expense, undertake the defense of, any such person upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of the person to repay the expenses if it should ultimately be determined that he is not entitled to indemnification under this Section 14.04.

(h) Application of Indemnification Provisions. The provisions of this Section 14.04 shall be applicable to claims, actions, suits, or proceedings made or commenced after December 31, 1975, whether arising from acts or omissions to act occurring before or after such date.

(i) Indemnification Not Exclusive. The rights of indemnification provided hereunder shall be in addition to any rights to which any person concerned may otherwise be entitled by contract or as a matter of law, and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, and administrators of any such person.

14.05. Payments from the end.

All payments of benefits as provided in this Plan shall be made solely out of, and to the extent of, the assets held in Trust, and no Employer shall be liable, directly or indirectly, for the payment of any benefits provided in this Plan, nor shall any Employer be liable for any deficiency existing at any time in any Trust.

-54-

14.06. Employment Rights.

The establishment or continuance of the Plan shall not be construed as conferring any legal rights upon any Employee or any person for a continuation of employment, nor shall it interfere with the right of an Employer to discharge any Employee or deal with him without regard to the existence of the Plan.

14.07. Voting Rights.

(a) The Company Stock Fund. Before each annual or special meeting of the stockholders of the Company, the Employee Benefits Committee shall cause to be sent to each Participant, and to the beneficiary of each deceased Participant, a form requesting confidential instructions to the Trustee of the Company Stock Fund on how to vote the number of Shares represented by the Units in the Company Stock Fund credited to each such Participant or beneficiary. Upon receipt of such instructions the Trustee shall vote the Shares as instructed. Instructions received from individual Participants and beneficiaries by the Trustee shall be held in the strictest confidence and shall not be divulged or released to any person, including officers or employees of the Company. The Fund Advisory Committee shall review the sufficiency of procedures established to safeguard the confidentiality of Participants and beneficiaries and shall monitor compliance with those procedures. For the purpose of voting Shares allocated to their Participants' Accounts, Participants and beneficiaries shall be "named fiduciaries" within the meaning of ERISA section 403(a)(1).

(b) Unvoted and Unallocated Shares. The Trustee shall have the right to vote, in person or by proxy, at its discretion, any Shares for which voting instructions shall not have been received. This
Section 14.07(b) shall apply to Shares held unallocated in a Suspense Account under the ESOP as well as to Shares that are allocated to Participants' Accounts.

(c) Other Funds. Voting rights, if any, with respect to securities in each of the funds other than the Company Stock Fund are delegated to the Trustee or the Investment Manager that has the investment responsibility with respect to each such Fund or portion thereof, unless the Fund Advisory Committee has expressly reserved such voting rights to the Trustee that is the custodian of the Fund or portion thereof for which the Investment Manager has the investment responsibility.

14.08. Tender Offers.

(a) General Rule. In the event of a tender offer by any party other than the Company for Shares, or in the event of any similar attempt to effect a change in control of the Company (as hereinafter defined) by sale or exchange of Shares, the Trustee of the Company Stock Fund shall cause to be sent to each Participant, and to the beneficiary of each deceased Participant, a form requesting confidential instructions to it as to whether the Shares represented by the Units in

-55-

the Company Stock Fund credited to each such Participant or beneficiary should be tendered pursuant to the offer or sold or exchanged pursuant to any similar attempt to effect a change in control. A Participant shall have the right to instruct the Trustee with respect to all Units credited to him, whether or not he is 100 percent vested. At or prior to the time the Trustee causes a request for instructions to be sent to each Participant and the beneficiary of each deceased Participant, it shall distribute or cause to be distributed to each such Participant and beneficiary copies of any materials required to be distributed by the Securities and Exchange Commission or by any other appropriate regulatory body in connection with the tender offer or similar attempt to effect a change in control. Upon receipt of instructions from a Participant or beneficiary, the Trustee shall tender or retain the Shares as instructed. Instructions received from individual Participants and beneficiaries by the Trustee shall be held in the strictest confidence and shall not be divulged or released to any person, including officers or employees of the Company. The Board of Directors shall appoint an independent fiduciary to review the sufficiency of procedures established to safeguard the confidentiality of Participants and beneficiaries and to monitor compliance with those procedures. For the purpose of tendering Shares allocated to their Participants' Accounts, Participants and beneficiaries shall be "named fiduciaries" within the meaning of ERISA section 403.

(b) Undirected and Unallocated Shares. The Trustee shall tender or take other action pursuant to Section 14.08(a) only pursuant to a Participant's or beneficiary's written instructions and shall not be entitled to assume that failure to receive written instructions from a Participant or beneficiary indicates a particular instruction from the Participant or beneficiary. Accordingly, in the case of any Shares with respect to which the Trustee has not received instructions, after its due diligence to do so, the Trustee shall act in such manner as it, in its sole discretion, determines. This Section 14.08(b) shall apply to Shares held unallocated in a Suspense Account under the ESOP as well as to Shares that are allocated to Participants' Accounts.

(c) Change in Control. For purposes of this Section 14.08, a change in control of the Company shall mean the accumulation by any individual, firm, corporation, or other entity (other than the Company or any subsidiary thereof or by any employee benefit plan maintained by the Company or such a subsidiary), singly or in combination with any associates or affiliates, of the beneficial ownership of more than 20 percent of the outstanding shares of capital stock of the Company authorized to be issued from time to time under the Company's certificate of incorporation.

(d) Tender Offer Proceeds Fund. Any proceeds from the sale of Shares pursuant to Section 14.08(a) shall be held in a Tender Offer Proceeds Fund. Pending instructions from the Fund Advisory Committee, that Fund shall be invested in such manner as the Trustee of the Company Stock Fund, in its sole discretion, determines.

-56-

14.09. Governing Law.

The Plan shall be administered and construed under ERISA and the internal laws of the State of Indiana (to the extent not preempted by federal law) and ERISA.

14.10. Merger or Consolidation.

In case of any merger or consolidation of this Plan or the assets of the Plan with, or transfer of the assets or liabilities of the Plan to, any other Plan, the terms of the merger, consolidation, or transfer shall be such that each Participant would (if the Plan then terminated) receive a benefit immediately after the merger, consolidation or transfer that is equal to or greater than the benefit he would have been entitled to receive immediately before the merger, consolidation, or transfer (if the Plan had then terminated).

14.11. Transfer from Affiliate.

In the case of a Participant who was transferred to employment with an Employer from employment with

(a) Any affiliate designated by the Employee Benefits Committee;

(b) Eli Lilly and Company, Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., Origin Medsystems, Inc., or Devices for Vascular Intervention, Inc. (the "Prior Employers"); or

(c) Any other company designated by the Employee Benefits Committee, the Trust shall accept a transfer of such Participant's account under the savings plan maintained by such affiliate, Prior Employer, or by such other company (as the case may be); provided that such savings plan is a plan intended to meet the requirements for qualification under Code section 401(a) and that the trust maintained pursuant thereto is a trust intended to be exempt from tax under Code section 501(a). In the case of a Participant whose account under a Prior Savings Plan is transferred to the Trust, the following rules shall apply:

(1) Any optional form of benefit (within the meaning of Code section 411(d)(6)) that is available under a Prior Savings Plan with respect to the transferred amount immediately before the transfer shall be available under the Plan with respect to such amount following the transfer.

(2) To the extent required by applicable law, the amount transferred, and the earnings accrued thereon following the transfer, shall be separately accounted for under the Plan and allocated to the Participant's Account pursuant to Section 6.01.

(3) To the extent required by Code sections 401(a)(11) and 417, any requirements imposed by Code sections 401(a)(11) and 417 with respect to the transferred amount immediately before the transfer shall

-57-

continue to apply to such amount (and the earnings thereon) following the transfer.

14.12. Reorganization.

The voting provisions of Sections 14.07 and 14.08 shall have no application with respect to any offer to exchange stock of Guidant Corporation for shares of Eli Lilly and Company held hereunder. Pursuant to Section 19.11(a), the Trustee shall accept any such offer and shall have no discretion to hold any shares of Eli Lilly and Company after the exchange is completed.

14.13. Loans to Participants.

A Participant may obtain a loan from the Plan as provided in this Section.

(a) To obtain a loan, a Participant must apply to the Employee Benefits Committee or its designee for the loan. The Employee Benefits Committee or its designee will have the sole responsibility for determining whether or not to grant a Plan loan. The Employee Benefits Committee will establish written guidelines with respect to application procedures, minimum amounts of loans, frequency of loans, and other conditions, limitations, and procedures.

(b) The amount of a loan to a Participant may not be less than $1,000 and may not exceed the least of the following:

(1) $50,000, reduced by the excess, if any, of

(A) the highest outstanding balance of loans from the Plan to the Participant during the one-year period ending on the day before the date on which the loan is made, over

(B) the outstanding balance of loans from the Plan to the Participant on the date on which the loan is made; or

(2) one-half of the value of that portion of the Participant's vested Accounts not invested in the Company Stock Fund.

For purposes of the limitations imposed by this Section, loans from any other plan of the Employer or a Related Employer will be treated as a loan from the Plan.

(c) Each loan will provide for a definite term and repayment schedule. The maximum period of repayment will not exceed 5 years.

(d) The outstanding balance of a loan must be repaid by level payments through payroll deduction, by a single payment of the entire balance, or according to other procedures established by the Employee Benefits Committee in

-58-

written guidelines. Except as otherwise permitted by the Secretary of the Treasury, the written guidelines will require that a loan must be repaid no less frequently than in substantially equal quarterly payments over the term of the loan. Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this Section and in accordance with Code section 414(u), an individual's loan repayments may be suspended for any period during which the individual is performing service in the uniformed services.

(e) A Plan loan will be in default upon the failure by the Participant to repay the loan in accordance with the provisions of Sections 14.13(c) and (d). If default occurs, the Employee Benefits Committee will foreclose on, sell, or otherwise dispose of the security for the loan at the time and in the manner determined by the Employee Benefits Committee.

(f) A loan will be evidenced by a promissory note and will bear interest at a reasonable rate determined by the Employee Benefits Committee. The rate will be commensurate with the prevailing interest rate charged on similar commercial loans under similar circumstances.

(g) A loan will be secured by a security interest in up to 50 percent of the value of the Participant's vested Participant's Account.

(h) The Employee Benefits Committee will make its determinations under this Section such that (1) loans are available to all Participants on a reasonably equivalent basis; and (2) the loan program does not discriminate in favor of Participants who are highly compensated Employees (as defined in Section 3.03).

(i) For purposes of crediting earnings to Participant's Accounts, a loan will be deemed a distribution from a Participant's Account and from particular Funds within a Participant's Account, as established by the Employee Benefits Committee in its written guidelines. That Participant's Account will share in applicable Fund earnings at a proportionately reduced rate and will be credited with accrued interest and principal repayments on the loan.

(j) If a Participant is married, his vested Account exceeds $5,000, and any portion of his vested Account includes amounts that must be paid in the form of a joint and survivor annuity absent his spouse's consent, the Participant's spouse must consent to the use of the Participant's vested Account as security for the loan. The consent must be obtained no earlier than the beginning of the 90-day period that ends on the date on which the loan is so secured, be in writing, be irrevocable, acknowledge the effect of the loan, and be witnessed by a Plan representative or notary public.

14.14. Transfer From Sulzer Medica USA Retirement Plan. As soon as practicable after May 1, 1999, the Trust shall accept a transfer from the trust for the Sulzer Medica USA Retirement Plan ("Sulzer Plan") of amounts representing the account balances in

-59-

the Sulzer Plan of those individuals who, as of the date of the transfer, are Employees. In the case of an Employee whose account balance under the Sulzer Plan is transferred to the Trust pursuant to the preceding sentence, the following rules shall apply:

(a) Any optional form of benefit (within the meaning of Code section 411(d)(6)) that is available under the Sulzer Plan with respect to the transferred amount immediately before the transfer shall be available under the plan with respect to that amount following the transfer.

(b) To the extent required by applicable law, the amount transferred with respect to a Participant, and the earning accrued thereon following the transfer, shall be separately accounted for under the Plan and allocated to the Participant's Account under this Plan.

(c) To the extent required by Code sections 401(a)(11) and 417, any requirements imposed by those Code sections with respect to the transferred amounts shall continue to apply to those amounts (and the earnings thereon) following the transfer.

14.15. Transfer From EVT Plan. As of June 1, 2000, the Trust shall accept a transfer from the trust for the Endovascular Technologies, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan ("EVT Plan") of amounts representing the account balances in the EVT Plan of those individuals who, as of the date of the transfer, are Employees. In the case of an Employee whose account balance under the EVT Plan is transferred to the Trust pursuant to the preceding sentence, the following rules apply:

(a) Any optional form of benefit (within the meaning of Code section 411(d)(6)) that is available under the EVT Plan with respect to the transferred amount immediately before the transfer shall be available under the Plan with respect to that amount following the transfer.

(b) To the extent required by applicable law, the amount transferred with respect to a Participant, and the earnings accrued thereon following the transfer, shall be separately accounted for under the Plan and allocated to the Participant's Account under this Plan.

(c) To the extent required by Code sections 401(a)(11) and 417, any requirements imposed by those Code sections with respect to the transferred amounts shall continue to apply to those amounts (and the earnings thereon) following the transfer.

-60-

14.16. Transfer From InControl Plan. As of August 1, 2002, the Trust shall accept a transfer from the trust for the InControl, Inc. 401(k) Plan (the "InControl Plan") of amounts representing all of the assets of the InControl Plan. Amounts credited to the accounts of an individual under the InControl Plan shall be credited to a corresponding Participant's Account for that individual under the Plan. To the extent required by applicable law, an amount transferred with respect to an individual, and the earnings accrued thereon following the transfer will be separately accounted for under the Plan.

14.17. Transfer From CTS Plan. As soon as practicable after September 30, 2002, the Trust shall accept a transfer from the trust for CardioThoracic Systems 401(K) Savings Plan ("CTS Plan") of amounts representing all of the assets of the CTS Plan. Amounts credited to the accounts of an individual under the DVI Plan shall be credited to a corresponding Participant Account for that individual under the Plan. To the extent required by applicable law, an amount transferred with respect to an individual, and the earnings accrued thereon following the transfer, will be separately accounted for under the Plan. Amounts transferred from the CTS Plan to this Plan as described in this Section are fully vested at all times.

14.18. Transfer From DVI Plan. As soon as practicable after March 31, 2003, the Trust shall accept a transfer from the trust for the Employees 401(k) Plan of Devices for Vascular Intervention, Inc. (the "DVI Plan") of amounts representing all of the assets of the DVI Plan. Amounts credited to the accounts of an individual under the DVI Plan shall be credited to a corresponding Participant's Account for that individual under the Plan. To the extent required by applicable law, an amount transferred, with respect to an individual, and the earnings accrued thereon following the transfer, will be separately accounted for under the Plan.

ARTICLE XV. AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION

15.01. Internal Revenue Approval, ERISA Compliance.

The Plan is designed to qualify under Code section 401(a) and other applicable provisions of the Code and to comply with ERISA. The Company through action of its Board of Directors may make any modifications or amendments to the Plan that are necessary or appropriate to qualify or maintain the Plan as a plan meeting the requirements of Section 401(a) or any other applicable provisions of the Code, ERISA, or other laws, regulations, or rulings.

15.02. Modification and Termination.

(a) By Board of Directors. It is the Company's expectation that the Plan will continue indefinitely, but the Company, by resolution of the Board of Directors, reserves the right to amend or modify the Plan in any respect or to terminate it in whole or in part. Any such termination or modification shall be effective at such date as the Company, by resolution of the Board of Directors, may determine. A modification that affects the rights or duties of any Trustee may be made only with the consent of that Trustee. Upon such an amendment, the affected Trustee shall be furnished with a certified copy thereof. The Plan may be amended retroactively, in the discretion of the Board of Directors. Notwithstanding the above, the accrued benefit of a Participant shall not be

-61-

decreased by an amendment to the Plan, other than an amendment described in Code section 412(c)(8) or in ERISA section 4281.

(b) Delegation of Amending Authority. The Board of Directors delegates to the Employee Benefits Committee the power to amend the Plan, pursuant to a written instrument filed with the important papers of the Company, for the limited purposes specified in Sections 1.01(a)(26)(A), 1.01(a)(26)(B)(iv), and 3.01. When acting in accordance with the delegation of authority provided in this Section 15.02(b), the Employee Benefits Committee shall be acting in a settlor capacity, and not as a fiduciary of the Plan.

(c) Effect of Termination or Modification on Employers. Any action taken by the Board of Directors or its designee under Section 15.02(a) above in terminating or modifying the Plan, or any decision made by the Company to discontinue further contributions that results in a termination of the Plan, shall be effective similarly to terminate or modify the Plan as to all subsidiary and affiliated companies that, at the effective date of such action, are included within the definition of "Employer" as set out in Article I.

15.03. Termination of Participation by Subsidiaries and Affiliate

(1) Right To Terminate. There is hereby separately reserved to each subsidiary or affiliated company of the Company that has been designated by the Company and that has adopted this Plan by resolution of its own board of directors (and which company by reason of such action is included within the definition of "Employer" under Article I), the right to terminate its participation in this Plan by action of its board of directors.

(2) Effect on Participants in Event of Termination. Upon the effective date of any termination by any Employer, all Employees of that Employer who are not, or do not thereupon become, Employees of another Employer shall cease thereafter to be Employees or Participants under the Plan, but all such employees who have been Participants in the Plan and who cease to be Employees or Participants under the Plan as above provided shall be treated as though they had a minimum of 5 years of Service under the Plan and shall be entitled to such rights of payment of Participants' Accounts as are available under Article X to Participants having at least 5 years of Service.

(3) Effect on Participants Where Plan Continued After Termination. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a subsidiary or affiliated company shall terminate its participation as an Employer in the Plan but shall continue the Plan, with appropriate amendments, or adopt a substantially similar plan, the withdrawal from the Plan by that Employer shall not be regarded as a termination of the Plan so far as such Employer and its Employees are concerned. In that event the rights of those Employees and their beneficiaries shall be governed in accordance with

-62-

the provisions of the Plan, as appropriately amended, and continued, or of the substantially similar plan so adopted by that company as if no withdrawal from the Plan had taken place, provided, however, that if an employee of the subsidiary or affiliated company is not eligible to continue participation in the Plan as so continued by that company but continues to meet the definition of "Employee" contained in Sections 1.01(a)(7)(A)(ii), (B), (C), and (D), his participation hereunder shall not be interrupted by the withdrawal of that company, and his rights and the rights of his beneficiaries shall continue to be governed in accordance with the provisions of this Plan.

(b) When Employer Is a "Qualified Subsidiary" upon Effective Date of Termination. Termination of, or withdrawal from, this Plan by an Employer shall not constitute a termination of this Plan if on the effective date of the termination or withdrawal the Employer is a Qualified Subsidiary as defined in Article I and all of the Employees of that Employer who are then participating in this Plan meet the definition of "Employee" contained in Sections 1.01(a)(7)(A)(ii), (B), (C), and (D). In that event, the rights of the Employees of the Employer and the rights of their beneficiaries shall continue to be governed in accordance with the provisions of this Plan, and the participation of those Employees in this Plan shall not be interrupted.

15.04. Distribution on Termination.

In the event of the complete or partial termination of the Plan or the complete discontinuance of contributions thereto, the assets then held in the Trust on behalf of affected Participants, after provision for payment of expenses of liquidation, shall be fully vested and distributable in accordance with the provisions of Section 10.01; provided, however, that, in the event the Employer has established or maintains another defined contribution plan (other than an employee ownership plan as defined in Code section 4975(e)(7)), the Salary Reduction Contributions (and the earnings thereon) in a Participant's Account shall not be distributed unless the Participant has met the withdrawal requirements in Section 7.01 or 8.01.

ARTICLE XVI. AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS

The agent for the service of legal process is the Secretary of the Company.

ARTICLE XVII. TOP HEAVY PLAN

17.01. General Rule.

The Plan shall meet the requirements of this Article XVII in the event that the Plan is or becomes a Top-Heavy Plan.

17.02. Top-Heavy Plan.

(a) Subject to the aggregation rules set forth in Section 17.02(b), the Plan shall be considered a Top-Heavy Plan pursuant to Code section 416(g) in

-63-

any Plan Year if, as of the Determination Date, the present value of the cumulative accounts of all Key Employees exceeds 60 percent of the value of the cumulative accounts of all of the Employees as of that Determination Date, excluding former Key Employees and excluding any Employee who has not performed services for the Employer during the 5 consecutive Plan Year period ending on the Determination Date, but taking into account in computing the ratio any distributions made during the 5 consecutive Plan Year period ending on the Determination Date. For purposes of the above ratio, the account of a Key Employee shall be counted only once each Plan Year, notwithstanding the fact that an individual may be considered a Key Employee for more than one reason in any Plan Year.

(b) Aggregation and Coordination with Other Plans. For purposes of determining whether the Plan is a Top-Heavy Plan and for purposes of meeting the requirements of this Article XVII, the Plan shall be aggregated and coordinated with other qualified plans in a Required Aggregation Group and may be aggregated or coordinated with other qualified plans in a Permissive Aggregation Group. If a Required Aggregation Group that includes the Plan is Top-Heavy, this Plan shall be considered a Top-Heavy Plan. If a Permissive Aggregation Group that includes the Plan is not Top-Heavy, this Plan shall not be a Top-Heavy Plan.

17.03. Definitions.

For the purpose of determining whether the Plan is Top-Heavy, the following definitions shall apply:

(a) Determination Date and Valuation Dates. The term "Determination Date" shall mean, in the case of any Plan Year, the last day of the preceding Plan Year. The value of an individual's account shall be determined as of the Valuation Date and shall include any contribution actually made after the Valuation Date but on or before the Determination Date. The term "Valuation Date" means the most recent Value Determination Date defined in Section 1.01(a)(33) occurring within a twelve (12) month period ending on the Determination Date.

(b) Key Employee. An individual shall be considered a Key Employee if he is an Employee or former Employee who at any time during the current Plan Year or any of the 4 preceding Plan Years:

(1) was an officer of the Employer who has annual compensation from the Employer in the applicable Plan Year in an amount greater than 50 percent of the amount in effect under Code section 415(b)(1)(A) for the Plan Year; provided, however, that the number of individuals treated as Key Employees by reason of being officers shall not exceed the lesser of 50 or 10 percent of all Employees, and provided further that, for purposes of determining the number of officers,

-64-

individuals disregarded under Code section 414(q)(8) may be disregarded here, and provided further, that if the number of individuals treated as officers is limited to 50, the individuals treated as Key Employees shall be those who, while officers, received the greatest annual Compensation in the applicable Plan Year and any of the 4 preceding Plan Years (without regard to the limitation set forth in Code section 401(a)(17)); or

(2) was one of the 10 Employees owning or considered as owning the largest interests in the Employer who has annual Compensation from the Employer in the applicable Plan Year in excess of the dollar limitation under Code section 415(c)(1)(A) as increased under Code section 415(d); or

(3) was a more than 5 percent owner of the Employer; or

(4) was a more than 1 percent owner of the Employer whose annual Compensation from the Employer in the applicable Plan Year exceeded $150,000.

For purposes of determining who is a Key Employee, ownership shall mean ownership of the outstanding stock of the Employer or of the total combined voting power of all stock of the Employer, taking into account the constructive ownership rules of Code section 318, as modified by Code section 416(i)(1).

For purposes of Section 17.03(b)(1) but not for purposes of 17.03(b)
(2), (3) and (4)--except for purposes of determining Compensation under Section 17.03(b)(4)--the term "Employer" shall include any entity aggregated with an Employer pursuant to Code section 414(b), (c) or (m).

For purposes of Section 17.03(b)(2), an Employee (or former Employee) who has some ownership interest is considered to be one of the top 10 owners unless at least 10 other Employees (or former Employees) own a greater interest than that Employee (or former Employee); provided that if an Employee has the same ownership interest as another Employee, the Employee having greater annual Compensation from the Employer is considered to have the larger ownership interest.

(c) Non-Key Employee. The term "Non-Key Employee" shall mean any Employee who is a Participant and who is not a Key Employee.

(d) Beneficiary. Whenever the term "Key Employee," "former Key Employee," or "Non-Key Employee" is used in this Article XVII, it includes the beneficiary or beneficiaries of that individual. If an individual is a Key Employee by reason of the foregoing sentence as well as a Key Employee in his own right, both the value of his inherited benefit and the value of his own account will be considered his Participant's Account for purposes of determining whether the Plan is a Top-Heavy Plan.

-65-

(e) Compensation and Compensation Limitation. For purposes of this Article XVII except as otherwise specifically provided, the term "Compensation" has the same meaning as in Section 4.02(b).

(f) Required Aggregation Group. The term "Required Aggregation Group" shall mean all other qualified defined benefit and defined contribution plans maintained by the Employer in which a Key Employee participates, and each other plan of the Employer that enables any plan in which a Key Employee participates to meet the requirements of Code section 401(a)(4) or 410(b).

(g) Permissive Aggregation Group. The term "Permissive Aggregation Group" shall mean all other qualified defined benefit and defined contribution plans maintained by the Employer that meet the requirements of Code sections 401(a)(4) and 410(b) when considered with a Required Aggregation Group.

17.04. Requirements Applicable if Plan is Top-Heavy.

In the event the Plan is determined to be Top-Heavy for any Plan Year, the following requirements shall apply:

(a) Minimum Allocation.

(1) In the case of a Non-Key Employee who is covered under this Plan but does not participate in any qualified defined benefit plan maintained by the Employer, the Minimum Allocation of contributions plus forfeitures allocated to the Participant's Account of each such Non-Key Employee who has not separated from service at the end of a Plan Year in which the Plan is Top-Heavy shall equal the lesser of 3 percent of Compensation for the Plan Year or the largest percentage of Compensation (including Salary Reduction Contributions) provided on behalf of any Key Employee for the Plan Year. The minimum Allocation provided hereunder may not be suspended or forfeited under Code section 411(a)(3)(B) or
411(a)(3)(D). The Minimum Allocation shall be made for a Non-Key Employee for each Plan Year in which the Plan is Top-Heavy, even if he has not completed a year of Service in the Plan Year or if he has declined to elect to have Salary Reduction Contributions made on his behalf.

(2) A Non-Key Employee who is covered under this Plan and under a qualified defined benefit plan maintained by the Employer shall be entitled to the Minimum Allocation under this Plan.

(3) No amount of a Non-Key Employee's Salary Reduction Contributions, Minimum Matching Contributions, or Additional Matching Contributions shall be treated as part of the Non-Key Employee's Minimum Allocation.

-66-

(b) Ton-Heavy Vesting Schedule. The nonforfeitable percentage of a Participant's interest shall be determined in accordance with the vesting schedule provided under Section 10.01(a)(1)(A).

ARTICLE XVIII. PAYSOP ACCOUNT

18.01. Transfer of Assets.

(a) Any PAYSOP Accounts maintained under the Prior Savings Plans on behalf of Participants who participated in those Prior Savings Plans shall be transferred to this Plan. The assets transferred from a PAYSOP Account with respect to a Participant shall be allocated to the Participant's PAYSOP Account in this Plan pursuant to Section 6.01. Accounting for amounts in a Participant's PAYSOP Account, including the earnings thereon, shall be separate from amounts attributable to Salary Reduction Contributions, Employer Contributions, and Employee Contributions to the Plan.

(b) A Participant shall be fully vested at all times in his PAYSOP Account and any accumulated earnings thereon.

(c) The transfer of a Participant's PAYSOP Account to the Plan shall not be treated as an annual addition for purposes of Article IV of the Plan.

18.02. Investment In the Company Stock Fund.

Each Participant's PAYSOP Account shall be invested in the Company Stock Fund. A Participant shall not be entitled to have his PAYSOP Account and any earnings attributable thereto invested in any Fund other than the Company Stock Fund, except as provided in Sections 5.06(b) and (c).

18.03. Withdrawal of PAYSOP Accounts.

Except as provided in Section 8.02, a Participant may not withdraw any portion of his PAYSOP Account, or the earnings attributable thereto, prior to his retirement, death, Disability, or other termination of employment with the Company and its affiliates.

18.04. Distribution of PAYSOP Accounts.

(a) Upon a Participant's Retirement, death, Disability, or other termination of employment with the Company and its affiliates, the Participant (or, if applicable, the Participant's beneficiary) shall be entitled to receive a distribution of his PAYSOP Account at the same time and in the same manner as he receives a distribution of the other portions of his Participant's Account under Article X; provided, however, that for purposes of Article X, a Participant's entire PAYSOP Account shall be deemed to be part of the Participant's "post-1986 account." A Participant shall not be entitled to elect a time or method of distribution, or to designate a beneficiary, with respect to his PAYSOP Account

-67-

that is different from the time and method of distribution and beneficiary that are applicable to the other portions of his post-1986 account.

(b) For purposes of determining, pursuant to Article X, whether a Participant's vested accrued benefit exceeds $5,000, the Participant's PAYSOP Account shall not be considered separately, but shall be included with the other portions of his Participant's Account.

(c) A Participant or beneficiary may elect, pursuant to Article XI, to receive the distribution of the Participant's PAYSOP Account in Shares rather than in cash; provided, however, that the Trustee shall distribute fractional Shares in cash rather than in common stock.

(d) A retired Participant who has elected to defer commencement of the distribution of his Participant's Account may make periodic withdrawals from his PAYSOP Account pursuant to Section 10.01(b)(3).

18.05. Qualified Domestic Relations Orders.

If any portion of a Participant's PAYSOP Account is subject to a qualified domestic relations order, that amount shall be paid in accordance with
Section 10.04. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 18.03 and Code section
409(d), payments may be made from a Participant's PAYSOP Account to an alternate payee under a qualified domestic relations order even if the Participant has not terminated his employment with the Company and its affiliates, and even if part or all of the Shares in the Participant's PAYSOP Account has not become eligible for distribution to the Participant under Code section 409(d). Except to the extent otherwise provided in the qualified domestic relations order, any distribution to an alternate payee under this Section 18.05 shall be derived from Shares in the order in which such Shares were allocated to the Participant's PAYSOP Account, beginning with the Shares that were most recently allocated to the Participant's PAYSOP Account.

ARTICLE XIX. ESOP PROVISIONS

19.01. Introduction.

This Article XIX shall be known as the "ESOP". The ESOP permits the Trustee to borrow amounts to finance the purchase of Shares, and provides for the investment of Employer Contributions, and the earnings thereon, in Shares, so that Participants will have an opportunity to become shareholders of the Company. The effective date of the ESOP shall be January 1, 1995.

The Company intends that the Profit-Sharing Plan and the ESOP together shall constitute a single plan under Treasury Regulation ss. 1.414(1)-l(b)(l). Accordingly, the provisions set forth in the other sections of the Plan shall apply to the ESOP in the same manner as those provisions apply to the Profit-Sharing Plan, except to the extent that those provisions are by their terms inapplicable to the ESOP, or to the extent that they are inconsistent with the specific provisions set forth below in this Article XIX.

-68-

19.02. Definitions.

The following words and phrases, as used in this Section XIX, shall have the following meanings unless a different meaning is plainly required by the context:

(a) "ESOP Account" shall mean the portion of a Participant's Account that reflects a Participant's or beneficiary's interest in the ESOP.

(b) "ESOP Shares Fund" shall mean the portion of the Company Stock Fund that is maintained for the investment of the ESOP assets. The ESOP Shares Fund shall include both ESOP assets that are allocated to Participants' and beneficiaries' ESOP Accounts and ESOP assets that are held unallocated in a Suspense Account.

(c) "Exempt Loan" shall mean a loan, loan guarantee, or other extension of credit to the ESOP from an individual or entity that is a "party in interest" within the meaning of ERISA section 3(14) or a "disqualified person" within the meaning of Code section 4975(e)(2), provided that the proceeds of the extension of credit are used by the Trustee to finance the purchase of Shares or to repay an Exempt Loan in accordance with Section 19.12.

(d) "Financed Shares" shall mean Shares purchased with the proceeds of an Exempt Loan and held in a Suspense Account. The term shall not include Shares that have been released from a Suspense Account and allocated to the ESOP Accounts of Participants or beneficiaries in accordance with Section 19.12.

(e) "Suspense Account" shall mean an account to which Shares purchased with the proceeds of an Exempt Loan (and earnings attributable to those Shares) shall be allocated until the Shares and earnings are released from suspense and allocated to the ESOP Accounts of Participants or beneficiaries in accordance with Section 19.12.

19.03. Eligibility.

An Employee shall become a Participant in the ESOP on the effective date of the ESOP, provided that such Employee is a Participant in the Plan on that date. Any other Employee shall become a Participant in the ESOP as of the date on which the Employee becomes a Participant in the Plan.

19.04. Employer Contributions.

(a) Matching Contributions.

(1) Minimum Matching Contributions. Except as otherwise provided in this Section 19.04, an Employer shall contribute to the ESOP on behalf of its Employees for each month an amount sufficient to provide each Employee with an allocation of Shares equal to 50 percent of the Employee's Salary Reduction Contributions for that month; provided,

-69-

however, that in no event shall Minimum Matching Contributions be made with respect to (1) Salary Reduction Contributions that exceed 6 percent of a Participant's Base Earnings Plus Commissions for the month; (2) Salary Reduction Contributions that exceed the limit set forth in Section 3.03(d); (3) Excess Salary Reduction Contributions; or (4) Salary Reduction Contributions attributable to Catch-Up Contributions under
Section 20.10. If an Employee's Salary Reduction Contributions stop before the end of a Plan Year because they reach the dollar limitation applicable to the Employee under federal tax law, then his Employer shall make a true-up Minimum Matching Contribution on behalf of the Employee for the month in which his Salary Reductions stop and for each month after that month through the last month of the Plan Year. The true-up Minimum Matching Contribution shall be sufficient to provide the Employee with an allocation of Shares equal to the difference, if any, between (A) 50 percent of the Employee's total Salary Reduction Contributions (other than those attributable to Catch-Up Contributions under
Section 20.10) for the Plan Year to date that are not in excess of 6 percent of the Employee's Base Earnings Plus Commissions for the Plan Year to date, and (b) the Minimum Matching Contributions previously made for the Employee for the Plan Year (including any true-up Minimum Matching Contributions).

Notwithstanding any of the foregoing, in no event shall Minimum Matching Contributions be made to the extent that those contributions would cause the contribution percentage limit set forth in Section 19.07 to be exceeded. An Employer shall make its Minimum Matching Contributions on a monthly basis. The Minimum Matching Contributions made by an Employer on behalf of an Employee participating in the Plan shall be allocated to the Employee's ESOP Account.

(2) Additional Matching Contributions. In the discretion of the Board of Directors or its designee, and except as otherwise provided in this Section 19.04, each Employer shall make an Additional Matching Contribution to the ESOP for a Plan Year in such amount as is determined by the Board of Directors or its designee, but not in excess of an amount sufficient to provide its Employees with an allocation of Shares equal to 50 percent of the Employee's Salary Reduction Contributions, including Salary Reduction Contributions made under an Employer Savings Plan, made for the Plan Year. An Additional Matching Contribution shall be made only on behalf of Employees who are participating in the Plan as of the first day of the last month of the Plan Year, who Retired during the Plan Year, or who died during the Plan Year while actively employed and participating in the Plan; provided, however, that in no event shall Additional Matching Contributions be made with respect to (1) Salary Reduction Contributions that exceed 6 percent of a Participant's Base Earnings Plus Commissions; (2) Salary Reduction Contributions that exceed the limit set forth in Section 3.03(d); (3) Excess Salary Reduction

-70-

Contributions; or (4) Salary Reduction Contributions attributable to Catch-Up Contributions under Section 20.10; and provided further that in no event shall Additional Matching Contributions be made to the extent that such contributions would cause the contribution percentage limit set forth in Section 19.07 to be exceeded. An Employer's Additional Matching Contributions for any Plan Year shall become due for payment to the Trustee of the Company Stock Fund on the last day of the Plan Year and shall be paid to the Trustee by the Employer within the period of time prescribed by law to permit a federal income tax deduction with respect to the Plan Year for those contributions. The Additional Matching Contributions made by an Employer on behalf of an Employee participating in the Plan shall be allocated to the Employee's ESOP Account.

(b) Basic Contributions. In the discretion of the Board of Directors or its designee, and except as otherwise provided in this
Section 19.04, an Employer shall contribute to the ESOP on behalf of each of its Employees participating in the Plan an amount sufficient to provide each Employee with an allocation of Shares equal to a percentage, determined annually by the Board of Directors or its designee prior to the beginning of each Plan Year, of each Employee's Base Earnings. An Employer shall make its Basic Contributions on a monthly basis. The Basic Contribution made by an Employer on behalf of an Employee participating in the Plan shall be allocated to the Employee's ESOP Account.

(c) Forfeitures. Except as otherwise provided in Section 19.04(d)(3), below, forfeitures attributable to Matching Contributions that arise under the Plan shall be allocated to Participants' ESOP Accounts on the basis of their Salary Reduction Contributions for any Plan Year in which the Employers have elected to make Minimum Matching Contributions and Additional Matching Contributions to the ESOP rather than to the Profit-Sharing Plan. Forfeitures attributable to Basic Contributions shall be allocated to Participants' ESOP Accounts on the basis of their Base Earnings for any Plan Year in which the Employers have elected to make Basic Contributions to the ESOP rather than to the Profit-Sharing Plan. Forfeitures allocated in this manner shall be treated as Minimum Matching Contributions, Additional Matching Contributions, or Basic Contributions, whichever is applicable, and shall be allocated to Participants' ESOP Accounts in the manner described in Section 19.04(a) or (b), above. The forfeiture allocations described in this Section 19.04(c)(3) shall reduce, dollar for dollar, the amount of the Minimum Matching Contributions, Additional Matching Contributions, or Basic Contributions, that otherwise would be allocated to the Participant pursuant to Section 19.04(a) or (b).

(d) Exempt Loan Contributions.

(1) Contribution Requirements. For each Plan Year (or portion thereof) during which there are Financed Shares in a Suspense Account, the Employer Contributions to the ESOP shall not be less than an amount

-71-

that is sufficient, when aggregated with dividend payments described in Section 19.10(a), to pay any currently maturing obligations under any Exempt Loan. The Employer Contributions under this Section 19.04(d) shall be paid in cash to the extent necessary to provide the ESOP with cash sufficient to pay any currently maturing obligations under any Exempt Loan, and shall be paid in two or more installments during the Plan Year to the extent necessary to permit the Trustee to meet the payment schedule for any Exempt Loan. The Employer Contributions described in this Section 19.04(d) shall be made without regard to whether the Employer Contributions exceed the current or accumulated earnings and profits of the Employers.

(2) Allocations. The value of the Shares released from a Suspense Account and allocated to a Participant's ESOP Account by reason of an Exempt Loan payment made pursuant to this Section 19.04(d) for any Plan Year (including the portion of the Exempt Loan payment that is attributable to dividends as described in
Section 19.10(a)) shall determine whether the Minimum Matching Contributions, Additional Matching Contributions, and Basic Contributions for the Plan Year are sufficient to provide eligible Participants with allocations whose value is at least as great as the amounts determined under Sections 19.04(a) and (b).

(3) Forfeitures. Forfeitures shall not be used to repay an Exempt Loan. For each Plan Year (or portion thereof) during which there are Financed Shares in a Suspense Account, forfeitures shall be applied in the manner described in Section 19.12 to replace dividends that are used to repay an Exempt Loan or to provide additional allocations to Participants. To the extent that forfeitures are not required to be used for either of the foregoing purposes under the provisions of Section 19.12, they shall be used to pay administrative expenses in accordance with
Section 12.02(n).

(e) Contributions of Shares. Except as provided in Section 19.04(d)(1), the Employers may, at their election, make all or any part of any Minimum Matching Contribution, Additional Matching Contribution, or Basic Contributions to the ESOP in Shares rather than in cash. The Shares so contributed shall have a fair market value equal to the amount of the Minimum Matching Contribution, Additional Matching Contribution, or Basic Contribution (or portion thereof). The fair market value of a Share shall be the mean between the highest and lowest quoted selling price per share for a 100 Share lot on the composite tape of New York Stock Exchange issues on the date of payment to the Trustee.

(f) Contributions to the Profit-Sharing Plan. The Employers may, at their election, make a Minimum Matching Contribution, Additional Matching Contribution, or Basic Contribution to the Profit-Sharing Plan pursuant to Section 3.06 in lieu of all or a portion of the Minimum Matching Contribution, Additional

-72-

Matching Contribution, or Basic Contribution otherwise required under this Section 19.04; provided that the Employers may not make a Minimum Matching Contribution, Additional Matching Contribution, or Basic Contribution to the Profit-Sharing Plan in lieu of any Minimum Matching Contribution, or Additional Matching Contribution, or Basic Contribution that is required to repay an Exempt Loan as described in
Section 19.04(d). The amount of the Minimum Matching Contribution, Additional Matching Contribution, or Basic Contribution otherwise required to be made pursuant to Section 19.04(a) or (b) with respect to a Participant shall be reduced, dollar for dollar, by the amount of any Minimum Matching Contribution, Additional Matching Contribution, or Basic Contribution that is allocated to the Participant's Profit-Sharing Account for the Plan Year.

(g) Deductibility. All Minimum Matching Contributions, Additional Matching Contributions, and Basic Contributions to the ESOP are conditioned on the deductibility of the contributions under Code section 404 for the taxable year with respect to which the contributions were made.

(h) Transfer of Shares from Profit-Sharing Accounts or PAYSOP

Accounts.

(1) Transfers at Election of Committee. The Fund Advisory Committee may, at its election, direct the Trustee to transfer from the Profit-Sharing Plan to the ESOP any portion of the Company Stock Fund that is attributable to Employer Contributions, and earnings thereon, credited to Participants` Profit-Sharing Accounts prior to the date of the transfer, or any portion of the Company Stock Fund that is credited to Participants' PAYSOP Accounts prior to the date of the transfer. Any Shares transferred in accordance with this Section 19.04(h) shall be held in the ESOP Shares Fund and shall be credited to the ESOP Accounts of those Participants and beneficiaries from whose Profit-Sharing Accounts or PAYSOP Accounts the Shares were transferred. Any shares transferred from a Participant's or beneficiary's PAYSOP Account to his ESOP Account shall continue to be accounted for separately after the transfer, and shall remain subject to the special rules set forth in Article XVIII.

(2) Effect of Transfers. Any Shares transferred in accordance with this Section 19.04(h) shall not be considered "annual additions" under Section 19.06, and shall not be taken into account in determining the contribution percentage of any Participant under Section 19.07.

(i) Contributions Not Recoverable by Employer. The Trustee shall hold the contributions received by it under this Section 19.04 for the respective Participants subject to the provisions of the Plan. No such contribution shall be recoverable by the Employers, except as provided in Section 19.04(j).

(j) Return of Employer Contributions. In the event that an Employer Contribution made pursuant to this Section 19.04

-73-

(1) is made under a mistake of fact, or

(2) is disallowed as a deduction under Code section 404 for the taxable year with respect to which it was made, the contribution shall, at the option of the Employer, be returned to the Employer within 1 year after the payment of the contribution or the disallowance of the deduction (to the extent disallowed), whichever is applicable; provided, however, that an Employer may not recover from the Plan any contribution that has been used to repay an Exempt Loan. The amount returned shall not be increased to reflect any investment earnings, but shall be decreased to reflect any losses. If the amount returned to an Employer would cause the balance of any Participant's Account to be less than the balance would have been had the returned contribution never been made, the amount to be returned shall be limited to prevent the loss.

19.05. Payment to Trustee.

(a) Matching Contributions.

(1) Minimum Matching Contributions. Except as provided in
Section 19.05(c), an Employer's Minimum Matching Contributions shall become due for payment to the Trustee of the Company Stock Fund at the end of each month during the Plan Year.

(2) Additional Matching Contributions. Except as provided in Section 19.05(c), an Employer's Additional Matching Contributions for any Plan Year shall become due for payment to the Trustee of the Company Stock Fund on the last day of the Plan Year and shall be paid to the Trustee by the Employer within the period of time prescribed by law to permit a Federal income tax deduction with respect to that Plan Year for those contributions.

(b) Basic Contributions. Except as provided in Section 19.05(c), an Employer's Basic Contributions shall become due for payment to the Trustee of the Company Stock Fund at the end of each month during the Plan Year.

(c) Exempt Loan Payments. Any Minimum Matching Contribution, Additional Matching Contribution, or Basic Contribution made pursuant to Section 19.04(d) shall be paid to the Trustee of the Company Stock Fund in time to permit the Trustee to satisfy any currently maturing obligation under any Exempt Loan. The Employers may, at their election, make all or any portion of such Minimum Matching Contribution, Additional Matching Contribution, or Basic Contribution (or direct the Trustee to use all or any portion of the dividends described in Section 19.10(a)) in time to permit the Trustee to pre-pay all or a portion of any obligation under an Exempt Loan, to the extent that such prepayment may be made without penalty to the ESOP.

-74-

19.06. Limits on Annual Additions.

(a) Limits on Additions to ESOP Accounts. The annual addition to a Participant's ESOP Account in any limitation year, when combined with the annual addition to a Participant's account under the Profit-Sharing Plan and under all other defined contribution plans described in Section 4.05, may not exceed the lesser of:

(1) $30,000 (as adjusted for increases in the limitation pursuant to Code section 415(d)); or

(2) 25 percent of a Participant's compensation (as defined in Section 4.02(b)) for the limitation year.

(b) Annual Additions.

(1) The term "annual addition" as used in Section 19.06(a) means Employer Contributions allocated to the Participant's ESOP Account during a limitation year. Except as provided in Section 19.06(c), the term "annual addition" also includes any Employer Contributions of principal and interest used to repay an Exempt Loan for the limitation year. For purposes of the immediately preceding sentence, the amount of the annual addition shall be determined by reference to the amount of the Employer Contribution used to repay an Exempt Loan rather than by reference to the value of the Shares released from a Suspense Account and allocated to a Participant's ESOP Account for the limitation year.

(2) The term "annual addition" shall not include any dividend paid with respect to Shares that are held in a Suspense Account or allocated to a Participant's ESOP Account. The term "annual addition" also shall not include the value of any Shares that are allocated to a Participant's ESOP Account in accordance with Section 19.12, below, in order to replace any dividends that are used to make payments on an Exempt Loan.

(c) Special Rules for Exempt Loan Payments. If no more than one-third of the Employer Contributions for a limitation year that are deductible under Code section 404(a)(9) are allocated to Participants who are highly compensated Employees (within the meaning of Code section 414(q)), the limitation imposed by this Section 19.06 shall not apply to:

(1) Forfeitures of Shares that were acquired with the proceeds of an Exempt Loan as described in Code section
404(a)(9)(A), or

(2) Employer Contributions that are deductible under Code section 404(a)(9)(B) and that are charged against a Participant's Account.

-75-

(d) Applicability of General Rules. Except to the extent otherwise provided above, the provisions of Article IV shall apply for purposes of determining the limits on annual additions under this
Section 19.06.

19.07. Limits on Employer Contributions.

(a) Contribution Limits. Minimum Matching and Additional Matching Contributions to the ESOP for any Plan Year shall satisfy the contribution percentage test in Code section 401(m)(2), including the rules of Treasury Regulations ss. 1.401(m)-1(b) or any successor provision. Minimum Matching Contributions and Additional Matching Contributions forfeited by a Participant under Section 3.04(c), with respect to a Plan Year shall not be taken into account in determining whether Employer Contributions to the ESOP for that Participant satisfy the contribution percentage test for that Plan Year. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Article XIX, if the contribution percentage of those Participants who are highly compensated Employees (as defined in Section 3.03) exceeds the limit imposed by Code section 401(m), the following rules shall apply:

(1) The amount of the excess aggregate contributions (determined in accordance with Code section 4.01(m)(6)(B) for the Plan Year, and any income attributable to those contributions, shall be distributed (or, if forfeitable, shall be forfeited) before the end of the following Plan Year.

(2) Any distribution in accordance with Section 19.07(a)
(1), above, shall be made to Participants who are highly compensated Employees on the basis of the respective portions of the excess aggregate contributions allocated to each such Participant. Effective for Plan Years beginning on or after January 1, 1997, the total dollar amount of excess aggregate contributions shall be allocated to some or all highly compensated Employees by reducing first the contributions of the highly compensated Participant with the highest dollar amount of contributions until (A) the total amount of excess aggregate contributions has been allocated, or (B) his remaining contributions are equal in dollar amount to the contributions of the highly compensated Employee with the next highest dollar amount. This process shall be repeated until all excess aggregate contributions have been allocated.

(3) Distributions required under this Section 19.07(a) shall be made notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan.

(b) Treatment of Exempt Loan Payments. To the extent that an Employer Contribution is used to repay an Exempt Loan as described in
Section 19.04(d), a Participant's contribution ratio for a Plan Year shall be determined by reference to the amount of the Employer Contribution that is made with respect to the Participant rather than by reference to the value of the Shares that are released

-76-

from a Suspense Account and allocated to the Participant's ESOP Account by reason of the Employer Contribution.

(c) Separate Testing. The determination of the amount of excess aggregate contributions under Section 19.07(a), for any Plan Year shall be made without regard to any Employer Contributions allocated to a Participant's Profit-Sharing Account for the Plan Year.

19.08. Vesting and Forfeitures.

(a) Vested Percentage. A Participant's vested interest in the Employer Contributions and earnings thereon allocated to his ESOP Account shall be determined in accordance with Section 10.01.

(b) Forfeitures. A Participant who is not 100 percent vested in all amounts allocated to his ESOP Account shall forfeit the nonvested portion of his ESOP Account in accordance with the rules prescribed by
Section 10.01(a). Shares that were allocated to the Participant's ESOP Account from a Suspense Account as provided in Section 19.12 shall be forfeited only after all other assets allocated to the Participant's ESOP Account have been forfeited. If the Participant subsequently returns to employment with the Company or an affiliate before he incurs five consecutive One Year Periods of Severance, his ESOP Account shall be restored if he satisfies the requirements of Section 10.01(a).

19.09. ESOP Accounts.

A separate account shall be established for each Participant, known individually as the ESOP Account and collectively as the ESOP Accounts. A Participant's ESOP Account shall be comprised of his ESOP Pre-Split Matching Account, his Company Match Account (formerly the ESOP Post-Split Matching Account), and his Retirement ESOP Account (formerly the ESOP Basic Contributions Account), maintained in accordance with the rules set forth in Article VI.

19.10. Payment of Dividends.

(a) Exempt Loan Payments. The Fund Advisory Committee may direct the Trustee to use any cash dividend, except cash dividends with respect to shares held in Participants' ESOP Pre-Split Matching Accounts, to make payments on an Exempt Loan, provided that the cash dividend is paid with respect to Shares that are held by the ESOP on the record date for the dividend. This Section 19.10(a) shall apply both to dividends paid with respect to Shares that are allocated to a Participant's or beneficiary's ESOP Account and to dividends paid with respect to Shares that are held in a Suspense Account. In addition, to the extent allowed by law, and as directed by the Fund Advisory Committee, this Section 19.10(a) shall apply to dividends paid with respect to Shares in Participants' ESOP Pre-Split Matching Contribution Accounts.

-77-

(b) Replacement of Dividends on Allocated Shares. To the extent that any dividend is paid with respect to Shares that are allocated to an ESOP Account, and the dividend is used to make a payment on an Exempt Loan in accordance with Section 19.10(a), Shares with a fair market value not less than the amount of the dividend shall be allocated to the ESOP Account for the Plan Year for which the dividend would have been allocated to the ESOP Account.

(c) Other Dividends. To the extent that any cash dividend is paid with respect to Shares that are allocated to a Participant's or beneficiary's ESOP Account on the record date for the dividend, and the dividend is not used to make a payment on an Exempt Loan in accordance with Section 19.10(a), the dividend shall be taken into account in determining the value of a Unit of Participation in the Company Stock Fund as described in Article VI except as otherwise provided in Section 19.16.

19.11. ESOP Shares Fund.

(a) Investment in Shares. Employer Contributions allocated to a Participant's or beneficiary's ESOP Account shall be credited entirely to the ESOP Shares Fund. The ESOP is designed to invest exclusively in qualifying employer securities, as defined in Code section 4975(e)(8). Accordingly, the ESOP Shares Fund shall consist solely of Shares except as provided in Section 19.11(c). The Trustee shall purchase such Shares required as a result of dividends and other distributions received with respect to Shares (other than dividends used to repay an Exempt Loan in accordance with Section 19.10) or distributed in accordance with Section 19.16 in the open market or by private purchase, including purchase from the Company.

(b) Purchase From the Company. Any purchase of Shares from the Company shall be at a price per share not in excess of the mean between the highest and lowest quoted selling price per share for a 100 Share lot on the composite tape of New York Stock Exchange issues on the date of purchase by the Trustee. Dividends and other distributions received with respect to Shares (other than dividends used to repay an Exempt Loan in accordance with Section 19.10) or distributed in accordance with Section 19.16 and Employer Contributions made in cash shall be invested in Shares as soon as practicable, except as otherwise provided in this Article XIX.

(c) Short-Term Investments. Nothing in this Section 19.11 or in
Section 19.12 shall be construed to prevent the Trustee from retaining in cash or cash equivalents or other short-term investments (i) the proceeds of any Exempt Loan, until such proceeds are used to acquire Shares, or to repay all or any portion of an Exempt Loan; (ii) cash dividends received on Shares held in the ESOP Shares Fund, until such dividends are applied to repay an Exempt Loan, invested in Shares, or distributed in accordance with Section 19.16; and (iii) such other amounts as may be required for the proper administration of the Trust.

-78-

19.12. Exempt Loan Provisions.

(a) Authority To Obtain or Modify an Exempt Loan. The Trustee, acting in accordance with a resolution of the Board of Directors, at the direction of the Fund Advisory Committee, or at the direction of corporate officers authorized by the Board of Directors, may obtain an Exempt Loan from time to time to finance the acquisition of Shares or to refinance a prior Exempt Loan. An Exempt Loan shall be primarily for the benefit of Participants of the ESOP and their beneficiaries and shall satisfy the conditions set forth in this Section 19.12. The Trustee, acting in accordance with a resolution of the Board of Directors, at the direction of the Fund Advisory Committee, or at the direction of corporate officers authorized by the Board of Directors, may extend or renew an Exempt Loan, or may otherwise modify the terms of the Exempt Loan, provided that the Exempt Loan, as extended, renewed, or otherwise modified, continues to satisfy the conditions set forth in this Section 19.12.

(b) Terms of the Exempt Loan. An Exempt Loan shall bear a reasonable rate of interest, shall be for specific term, and shall not be payable on demand except in the event of default. Any collateral pledged to the lender by the Trustee shall consist only of the Financed Shares purchased with the proceeds of the Exempt Loan, or Financed Shares purchased with the proceeds of a prior Exempt Loan that is being refinanced; provided that this sentence shall not be construed to prevent the Company from guaranteeing repayment of the Exempt Loan. Any pledge of Financed Shares shall provide for the release of the Shares so pledged as the Trustee makes payments on the Exempt Loan and allocates the Shares to Participants' ESOP Accounts. Under the terms of the Exempt Loan, the lender shall have no recourse against assets of the ESOP except with respect to (i) the Financed Shares pledged to secure the Exempt Loan, (ii) Employer Contributions (other than contributions of Shares) that are made to the ESOP to meet its obligations under the Exempt Loan, and (iii) earnings attributable to the Financed Shares or to the investment of the Employer Contributions.

(c) Use of Loan Proceeds. The Trustee shall use the proceeds of an Exempt Loan, within a reasonable time after their receipt by the ESOP, only for one or more of the following purposes: (i) to acquire Shares; (ii) to repay the Exempt Loan; or (iii) to repay a prior Exempt Loan. Until the proceeds of an Exempt Loan are used as described in the preceding sentence, the Trustee may invest such proceeds in cash or cash equivalents or other short-term investments in accordance with Section 19.11(c). The Trustee shall pay no more than "adequate consideration" (within the meaning of ERISA section 3(18)) for any Shares acquired with the proceeds of an Exempt Loan.

(d) Suspense Account. Financed Shares acquired by the ESOP with the proceeds of an Exempt Loan shall be allocated to a Suspense Account. The Financed Shares shall be released from the Suspense Account only as the Trustee makes payments on the Exempt Loan and shall be allocated to the ESOP Accounts of Participants or beneficiaries who are eligible under Section 19.04 to

-79-

receive an allocation of Employer Contributions or who are eligible under Section 19.10 to receive an allocation to replace dividends that were used to repay the Exempt Loan. The number of Financed Shares to be released from the Suspense Account in each Plan Year for allocation to ESOP Accounts shall be determined according to the method set forth in Section 19.12(d)(1), unless the Fund Advisory Committee expressly provides that the method set forth in Section 19.12(d)(2) shall apply with respect to a particular Exempt Loan.

(1) General Rule. The number of Financed Shares held in the Suspense Account immediately before the release for the current Plan Year shall be multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the amount of principal and interest paid on the Exempt Loan for that Plan Year, and the denominator of which is the sum of the numerator plus the total payments of principal and interest on the Exempt Loan projected to be made for all future Plan Years. The number of future Plan Years under the Exempt Loan shall be determined without regard to possible extensions or renewal periods, and the interest to be paid in future Plan Years shall be computed by using the interest rate in effect as of the end of the current Plan Year.

(2) Special Rule. The Fund Advisory Committee, acting in accordance with a resolution of the Board of Directors, may direct at the time the Exempt Loan is obtained (or the terms of the Exempt Loan may provide) that Financed Shares will be released from the Suspense Account based solely on the ratio that the payments of principal for each Plan Year bear to the total principal amount of the Exempt Loan. This method may be used only to the extent that the following conditions are satisfied: (i) the Exempt Loan provides for annual payments of principal and interest at a cumulative rate that is not less rapid at any time than level annual payments of such amounts for 10 years; (ii) interest included in any payment on the Exempt Loan is disregarded only to the extent that it would be determined to be interest under standard loan amortization tables; and (iii) the entire duration of the Exempt Loan repayment period does not exceed 10 years, even in the event of a renewal, extension, or refinancing of the Exempt Loan.

(e) Repayment of Exempt Loan. The payments of principal and interest on an Exempt Loan (other than payments made pursuant to
Section 19.12(g), by reason of a default) shall be made by the Trustee (as directed by the Fund Advisory Committee) only from Employer Contributions to the ESOP (other than contributions of Shares), from earnings attributable to such Employer Contributions, and from any dividends received by the Trust on the Shares held by the ESOP (including earnings on such dividends), except for dividends received on Shares held in Participants' ESOP Pre-Split Matching Accounts. The Trustee shall account separately for such Employer Contributions, earnings, and dividends until the Exempt Loan is repaid. To the extent that dividends on Shares are used to repay the Exempt Loan in accordance with Section 19.10, such

-80-

dividends shall be used first to repay the principal amount of the Exempt Loan; dividends shall be used to pay interest on the Exempt Loan only to the extent that the aggregate amount of the dividends used to repay the Exempt Loan in any Plan Year exceeds the amount of the principal payment due on the Exempt Loan for that Plan Year.

(f) Allocations to ESOP Accounts. The Shares that are released from a Suspense Account in any Plan Year shall be allocated to Participants' and beneficiaries' ESOP Accounts as follows:

(1) Each Participant's or beneficiary's ESOP Account shall be credited with

(A) Shares whose fair market value (determined as of the date of allocation to the ESOP Account, based upon the mean between the highest and lowest quoted selling price per share for a 100-Share lot on the composite tape of New York Stock Exchange issues) equals the value of the cash dividends used to repay an Exempt Loan, to the extent that the dividends were paid with respect to the Shares allocated to the Participant's or beneficiary's ESOP Account for the Plan Year; and

(B) Shares whose fair market value (determined as of the date of allocation to the ESOP Account, based upon the mean between the highest and lowest quoted selling price per share for a 100-Share lot on the composite tape of New York Stock Exchange issues) equals the value of the Employer Contribution that the Participant is eligible to receive under the ESOP for the Plan Year (reduced by the amount of any Employer Contribution that the Participant has received or is entitled to receive under the Profit-Sharing Plan for the Plan Year, and by the amount of any Employer Contribution that is allocated directly to the Participant's ESOP Account for the Plan Year).

The order of allocation of Shares pursuant to this Section 19.12(f)(1) shall be determined by the Board of Directors or its designee or the Fund Advisory Committee.

(2) Any Shares remaining after the allocations described in
Section 19.12(f)(1) shall be used to provide an additional Employer Contribution for the Plan Year, calculated by increasing the Additional Matching Contribution percentage under Section 19.04(a)(2) to the extent necessary to provide for the allocation of such Shares to Participants' ESOP Accounts.

Except as provided in the following paragraph, the Shares released from a Suspense Account for any Plan Year shall be allocated to Participants' and beneficiaries' ESOP

-81-

Accounts on (or as soon as practicable after) the allocation date for the Minimum Matching Contribution, Additional Matching Contribution, Basic Contribution, or dividend to which the released Shares are attributable. In no event shall Shares released from a Suspense Account be allocated as of a date later than the end of the Plan Year in which the Exempt Loan payment is made.

If the Trustee uses an Employer Contribution to make a payment on an Exempt Loan after the end of a Plan Year but on or before the time prescribed in Code section 404(a)(6), the Fund Advisory Committee may direct that some or all of the Shares released from a Suspense Account by reason of the payment shall be applied to satisfy the Employer Contribution obligation for the Plan Year preceding the Plan Year in which the payment is made, and that the Shares so applied shall be allocated to Participants' ESOP Accounts as of the end of that preceding Plan Year.

If the Shares released from a Suspense Account in any Plan Year are not sufficient to provide the allocations described in Section 19.12(F)(1)(A) or (B), the Employers shall make an additional contribution to the ESOP in an amount sufficient to complete such allocations. The total amount of any forfeitures arising pursuant to Section 10.01(a) for a Plan Year, to the extent that those forfeitures have not previously been allocated to a Participant's or beneficiary's account or used to repay an Exempt Loan, shall be treated as part of the additional contribution described in the preceding sentence. An additional contribution made in order to provide the allocation described in
Section 19.12(f)(1)(A), shall be treated as a dividend; an additional contribution made in order to provide the allocation described in Section 19.12(f)(1)(B), shall be treated as an Employer Contribution, in accordance with
Section 19.04(d).

(g) Requirements in the Event of Default. In the event of default on the Exempt Loan, the value of the ESOP assets transferred in satisfaction of the Exempt Loan shall not exceed the amount of the default. If the lender is a party in interest (as defined in ERISA section 3(14)) or a disqualified person (as defined in Code section 4975(e)(2)), the Exempt Loan shall provide for a transfer of ESOP assets on default only upon and to the extent of the failure of the ESOP to meet the payment schedule of the Exempt Loan; provided that a party in interest or disqualified person shall not be considered a "lender" for the purposes of this sentence solely because such party in interest or disqualified person guaranteed the Exempt Loan.

(h) Put Options. Except as provided in this Section 19.12(h), no employer security acquired with the proceeds of an Exempt Loan shall be subject to a put, call, or other option, or to a buy-sell or similar arrangement, while it is held by and when it is distributed from the ESOP. If an employer security acquired with the proceeds of an Exempt Loan is not publicly traded when distributed, or if it is subject to a trading limitation when distributed, the security shall be subject to a put option that permits the Participant or beneficiary to resell the security to the Company during the 15-month period following the distribution of the security. The provisions of this
Section 19.12(h) shall apply

-82-

whether or not the ESOP is an employee stock ownership plan at the time the security is held or distributed.

(i) Multiple Exempt Loans.

(1) Amortization and Share Release. If there is more than one Exempt Loan outstanding, the Fund Advisory Committee shall direct the Trustee either (A) to amortize each Exempt Loan separately, or (B) to aggregate the principal and interest payments calculated separately with respect to two or more outstanding Exempt Loans and to amortize the Exempt Loans so aggregated as if they were a single Exempt Loan. If the Fund Advisory Committee elects to amortize two or more outstanding Exempt Loans as if they were a single Exempt Loan, the Fund Advisory Committee shall aggregate the Financed Shares purchased with the proceeds of each Exempt Loan to determine the number of Shares released from the Suspense Account and allocated to Participants' and beneficiaries' ESOP Accounts for any year with respect to the aggregated Exempt Loans.

(2) Share Allocation. The Fund Advisory Committee may allocate the Shares purchased with each Exempt Loan in proportion to the payments of principal and interest made with respect to that Exempt Loan, or the Fund Advisory Committee may direct the Trustee to allocate the Shares purchased with one Exempt Loan more rapidly than the Shares purchased with another Exempt Loan; provided, however, that the Fund Advisory Committee's method of attributing the Shares allocated for a given year to a particular Exempt Loan shall not affect the number of Shares released from the Suspense Account and allocated for that year, which number shall be determined in accordance with Section 19.12(d), and as provided in Section 19.12(i)(1).

(3) Eligible Collateral. To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Fund Advisory Committee may, from time to time, determine the number of Financed Shares remaining in the Suspense Account that are pledged (or that are eligible to be pledged) as collateral for a particular Exempt Loan; provided, however, that the number of Financed Shares that are pledged (or eligible to be pledged) as collateral for a particular Exempt Loan shall not exceed the number of Financed Shares that would be pledged (or eligible to be pledged) if the Fund Advisory Committee had allocated the Shares purchased with each Exempt Loan in proportion to the payments of principal and interest made with respect to the Exempt Loan. When the Fund Advisory Committee makes a determination described in this Section 19.12(i)(3), the Fund Advisory Committee shall communicate the number of Financed Shares pledged (or eligible to be pledged) as collateral for a particular Exempt Loan to the Trustee, and the Trustee may rely on such communications.

-83-

19.13. Distribution of ESOP Accounts.

(a) General Rule. Upon a Participant's Retirement, death, Disability, or other termination of employment with the Company and its affiliates, the Participant (or, if applicable, the Participant's beneficiary) shall be entitled to receive a distribution of the vested portion of his ESOP Account at the same time and in the same manner as he receives a distribution of the other portions of his Participant's Account under Article X. A Participant shall not be entitled to elect a time or method of distribution, or to designate a beneficiary, with respect to his ESOP Account that is different from the time and method of distribution and beneficiary that are applicable to the other portions of his Participant's Account.

(b) Cash-Outs. For purposes of determining, pursuant to Article X, whether a Participant's vested accrued benefit exceeds $5,000, the Participant's ESOP Account shall not be considered separately, but shall be included with the other portions of his Participant's Account.

(c) Distributions in Shares. A Participant or beneficiary may elect, pursuant to Article XI, to receive the distribution of the Participant's ESOP Account in Shares rather than in cash; provided that the Trustee shall distribute fractional shares in cash rather than in Shares.

(d) Post-Retirement Withdrawals. A Retired Participant who has elected to defer commencement of the distribution of his Participant's Account may make periodic withdrawals from his ESOP Account pursuant to Section 10.01(b)(3).

19.14. Withdrawal and Diversification Rights.

(a) Withdrawals. A Participant may withdraw his Employer Contributions (and earnings thereon) from his ESOP Account subject to the same rules as apply to withdrawals of Employer Contributions (and earnings thereon) from the Participant's Account under Article VIII. A Participant may elect to receive any withdrawal described in this
Section 19.14(a) in the form of Shares rather than in cash.

(b) Diversification. In accordance with procedures established by the Employee Benefits Committee, a Participant who,has attained 50 years of age and has 10 or more Years of Service may elect at any time during a Plan Year to diversify his ESOP Account by investing his ESOP Account and the earnings thereon in the investment funds established pursuant to Section 5.01 under the following schedule: (a) a Participant aged 50-54 may diversify a cumulative total of 25 percent of the value of his ESOP Account; (b) a Participant aged 55-59 may diversify a cumulative total of 50 percent of the value of his ESOP Account; (c) a Participant aged 60 or older may diversify a cumulative total of 75 percent of the value of his ESOP Account.

-84-

19.15. Voting and Tendering of Company Securities.

A Participant shall be entitled to vote or tender the Shares allocated to his ESOP Account in accordance with the rules set forth in Sections 14.07 and 14.08.

19.16. Election Regarding Dividends.

Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, effective June 1, 2003, to the extent that any cash dividend is paid with respect to Shares that are allocated to a Participant's or beneficiary's ESOP Account on the ex-date for the dividend (as defined in Section 19.16(c)(8)), and the dividend is not used to make a payment on an Exempt Loan, the dividend shall be subject to the election described in this Section.

(a) Election to Receive or Reinvest Dividend. The Participant or beneficiary to whose ESOP account the Shares are allocated as of the dividend ex-date may elect to have 100% of the cash dividend with respect to those Shares either (1) distributed from the Plan and paid to him, or (2) retained by the Plan and invested as provided in
Section 19.11. A Participant or beneficiary may make or change an election at any time in the manner prescribed by the Employee Benefits Committee, and any election made will remain in effect until the Participant or beneficiary changes it. The election in effect on the ex-date for a dividend will apply to that dividend. If no election is in effect on the ex-date for a dividend, the Participant or beneficiary will be deemed to have elected to have the dividend retained by the Plan and invested as provided in Section 19.11.

(b) Receipt of Dividends. If a Participant or beneficiary elects to have a cash dividend distributed from the Plan and paid to him, a check in the amount of the dividend will be mailed to him by United States mail as soon as administratively feasible after the payable date for the dividend.

(c) Dividends 100% Vested. A Participant or beneficiary is 100% vested in any cash dividend that is subject to the election described in this Section.

(d) Treatment of Dividends. Cash dividends subject to the election described in this Section are treated as follows:

(1) Spousal Consent not Required. A Participant or beneficiary need not obtain his spouse's consent to an election described in this Section.

(2) No Offset Against Required Distributions. Dividends distributed from the Plan and paid to a Participant or beneficiary pursuant to an election under this Section shall not reduce the amount of any distribution required to be paid under Code section 401(a)(9).

(3) No Rollovers. Dividends distributed from the Plan and paid to a Participant or

-85-

beneficiary pursuant to the Participant's or beneficiary's election under this Section are not considered eligible rollover distributions under Code section 402(f)(2)(A).

(4) Offset Against Hardship Withdrawals. Dividends distributed from the Plan and paid to a Participant pursuant to the Participant's election under this Section shall reduce the amount of any withdrawal paid under Article VII between the dividend ex-date and the payable date for the dividend.

(5) Consideration of Dividends. Dividends subject to the elections described in this Section shall not be considered annual additions, Salary Reduction Contributions, or elective deferrals.

(6) Deceased Participants. A Participant's election will be deemed to be an election to have all cash dividends retained by the Plan and invested as provided in Section 19.11 beginning on the date of his death and ending on the date'his beneficiary changes it.

(7) Compliance With Code Section 404(k). The provisions of this Section comply with Code section 404(k), and the provisions shall be construed accordingly.

(8) Dividend Ex-Date. The dividend ex-date with respect to a dividend is the date that is two business days prior to the record date for the dividend.

ARTICLE XX. AMENDMENT OF THE PLAN FOR EGTRRA

20.01. Adoption and Effective Date of Amendment.

This Article XX is adopted to reflect certain provisions of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 ("EGTRRA"). This Article is intended as good faith compliance with the requirements of EGTRRA and is to be construed in accordance with EGTRRA and guidance issued thereunder. Except as otherwise provided, this Article shall be effective as of the first day of the first Plan Year beginning after December 31, 2001.

20.02. Supersession of Inconsistent Provisions.

This Section shall supersede the provisions of the Plan to the extent those provisions are inconsistent with the provisions of this Article.

20.03. Limitation on Contributions.

(a) Effective Date. This Section shall be effective for limitation years beginning after December 31, 2001.

(b) Maximum Annual Addition. Except to the extent permitted under Section 20.10 and Code section 414(v), if applicable, the annual addition that may

-86-

be contributed or allocated to a Participant's account under the Plan for any limitation year shall not exceed the lesser of:

(1) $40,000, as adjusted for increases in the cost-of-living under Code section 415(d), or

(2) 100 percent of the Participant's compensation, within the meaning of Code section 415(c)(3), for the limitation year. For purposes of this Article XX, the term "compensation" shall mean the Participant's wages within the meaning of Code section 3401 (without regard to any rule under Code section 3401 that limits amounts included in wages based on the nature or location of the employment) and all other payments for which the Employer is required to furnish the Participant with a written statement under Code sections 6041(d) and 6051(a)(3). "Compensation" also includes amounts that would have been paid to the Employee during the Plan Year in the absence of a salary redirection agreement but are excluded from gross income pursuant to Code section 125,
132(f), 457, or 402(g).

The compensation limit referred to in this paragraph shall not apply to any contribution for medical benefits after separation from service (within the meaning of Code sections 401(h) or 419A(f)(2)), which is otherwise treated as an annual addition.

20.04. Increase In Compensation Limit.

The annual compensation of each Participant taken into account in determining allocations for any Plan Year beginning after December 31, 2001, shall not exceed $200,000, as adjusted for cost-of-living increases in accordance with Code section 401(a)(17)(B). Annual compensation means compensation during the Plan Year or such other consecutive 12-month period over which compensation is otherwise determined under the Plan (the determination period). The cost-of-living adjustment in effect for a calendar year applies to annual compensation for the determination period that begins with or within such calendar year.

20.05. Modification of Top-Heavy Rules.

(a) Effective Date. This Section shall apply for purposes of determining whether the Plan is a top-heavy Plan under Code section 416(g) for Plan Years beginning after December 31, 2001, and whether the Plan satisfies the minimum benefits requirements of Code section 416(c) for those years. This Section 20.05 amends Article XVII of the Plan.

(b) Determination of Top-Heavy Status.

(1) Key Employee. "Key employee" means any Employee or former Employee (including any deceased Employee) who at any time during the Plan Year that includes the determination date was an officer of the Employer having annual compensation greater than $130,000 (as

-87-

adjusted under Code section 416(i)(1) for Plan Years beginning after December 31, 2002), a 5-percent owner of the Employer, or a 1-percent owner of the Employer having annual compensation of more than $150,000. For this purpose, annual compensation means compensation within the meaning of Code section 415(c)(3). The determination of who is a key employee will be made in accordance with Code section 416(i)(1) and the applicable regulations and other guidance of general applicability issued thereunder.

(2) Determination of Present Values and Amounts. This
Section 20.05(b)(2) shall apply for purposes of determining the present values of accrued benefits and the amounts of account balances of Employees as of the determination date.

(A) Distributions During Year Ending on the Determination Date. The present values of accrued benefits and the amounts of account balances of an Employee as of the determination date shall be increased by the distributions made with respect to the Employee under the Plan and any plan aggregated with the Plan under Code section 416(g)(2) during the 1-year period ending on the determination date. The preceding sentence shall also apply to distributions under a terminated plan which, had it not been terminated, would have been aggregated with the Plan under Code section
416(g)(2)(A)(i). In the case of a distribution made for a reason other than separation from service, death, or disability, this provision shall be applied by substituting 5-year period for 1-year period.

(B) Employees Not Performing Services During Year Ending on the Determination Date. The accrued benefits and accounts of any individual who has not performed services for the Employer during the l-year period ending on the determination date shall not be taken into account.

(3) Minimum Benefits.

(A) Matching Contributions. Employer matching contributions shall be taken into account for purposes of satisfying the minimum contribution requirements of Code section 416(c)(2) and the Plan. The preceding sentence shall apply with respect to matching contributions under the Plan or, if the Plan provides that the minimum contribution requirement shall be met in another plan, such other plan. Employer matching contributions that are used to satisfy the minimum contribution requirements shall be treated as matching contributions for purposes of the actual contribution percentage test and other requirements of Code section 401(m).

-88-

(B) Contributions Under Other Plans. Non-key Employees who participate in the Guidant Retirement Plan ("Retirement Plan") will receive the product of the Employee's Compensation (as defined in the Retirement Plan) for the Testing Period and the lesser of 2 percent per Year of Minimum Benefit Service (as defined in the Retirement Plan) or 20 percent. For purposes of this Section, "Compensation", "Testing Period" and "Year of Minimum Benefit Service" will have the meaning assigned to them in the Retirement Plan.

20.06. Direct Rollovers of Plan Distributions.

(a) Effective Date. This Section 20.06 shall apply to distributions made after December 31, 2001.

(b) Modification of Definition of Eligible Retirement Plan. For purposes of the direct rollover provisions in Section 11.02, an "eligible retirement plan" shall also mean an annuity contract described in Code section 403(b) and an eligible plan under Code section 457(b), which is maintained by a state, political subdivision of a state, or any agency or instrumentality of a state or political subdivision of a state and which agrees to separately account for amounts transferred into such plan from this Plan. The definition of "eligible retirement plan" shall also apply in the case of a distribution to a surviving spouse, or to a spouse or former spouse who is the alternate payee under a qualified domestic relation order, as defined in Code section 414(p).

(c) Modification of Definition of Eligible Rollover Distribution to Exclude Hardship Distributions. For purposes of the direct rollover provisions in Section 11.02, any amount that is distributed on account of hardship shall not be an eligible rollover distribution and the distributee may not elect to have any portion of such a distribution paid directly to an eligible retirement plan.

20.07. Rollovers Disregarded in Involuntary Cash-Outs.

(a) Applicability and Effective Date. This Section 20.07 shall apply to distributions made after December 31, 2001, regardless of when the Participant separated from service.

(b) Rollovers Disregarded in Determining Value of Account Balance for Involuntary Distributions. For purposes of Section 10.01(b), the value of a Participant's nonforfeitable account balance shall be determined without regard to that portion of the account balance that is attributable to rollover contributions (and earnings allocable thereto) within the meaning of Code sections 402(c),
403(a)(4), 403(b)(8), 408(d)(3)(A)(ii), and 457(e)(16). If the value of the Participant's nonforfeitable account balance as so determined is $5,000 or less, the Plan shall immediately distribute the Participant's entire nonforfeitable account balance.

-89-

20.08. Repeal of Multiple Use Test.

The multiple use test described in Treasury Regulation ss. 1.401(m)-2 shall not apply for Plan Years beginning after December 31, 2001.

20.09. Elective Deferrals: Contribution Limitation.

No Participant shall be permitted to have elective deferrals made under this Plan, or any other qualified plan maintained by the employer during any taxable year, in excess of the dollar limitation contained in Code section 402(g) in effect for that taxable year, except to the extent permitted under
Section 20.10 and Code section 414(v), if applicable.

20.10. Catch-Up Contributions.

All Employees who are eligible to make elective deferrals under this Plan and who have attained age 50 before the close of the Plan Year shall be eligible to make catch-up contributions in accordance with, and subject to thin limitations of, Code section 414(v). Catch-up contributions shall not be taken into account for purposes of the provisions of the Plan implementing the required limitations of Code sections 402(g) and 415. The Plan shall not be treated as failing to satisfy the provisions of the Plan implementing the requirements of Code section 401(k)(3), 401(k)(11), 401(k)(12), 410(b), or 416, as applicable, by reason of the making of such catch-up contributions. Catch-up contributions shall apply to contributions after December 31, 2001.

20.11. Suspension Period Following Hardship Distribution.

A Participant who receives a distribution of elective deferrals after December 31, 2001, on account of hardship shall be prohibited from making elective deferrals and employee contributions under this and all other plans of the Employer for 6 months after receipt of the distribution.

A Participant who receives a distribution of elective deferrals in calendar year 2001 on account of hardship shall be prohibited from making elective deferrals and employee contributions under this and all other plans of the employer for the period specified in the provisions of the Plan relating to suspension of elective deferrals that were in effect prior to this amendment.

ARTICLE XXI. MINIMUM DISTRIBUTION REQUIREMENTS

21.01. General Rules.

(a) Effective Date. The provisions of this Article will apply for purposes of determining required minimum distributions for calendar years beginning with the 2003 calendar year.

(b) Precedence. The requirements of this Article will take precedence over any inconsistent provisions of the Plan.

-90-

(c) Requirements of Treasury Regulations Incorporated. All distributions required under this Section will be determined and made in accordance with the Treasury Regulations under Code section 401(a)(9).

21.02. Time and Manner of Distribution.

(a) Required Beginning Date. The Participant's entire interest will be distributed, or begin to be distributed, to the Participant no later than the Participant's required beginning date.

(b) Death of Participant Before Distributions Begin. Unless a Participant or Beneficiary elects to apply the Five-Year Rule pursuant to Section 21.05, if the Participant dies before distributions begin, the Participant's entire interest will be distributed, or begin to be distributed, no later than as follows:

(1) If the Participant's surviving spouse is the Participant's sole designated beneficiary, then distributions to the surviving spouse will begin by December 31 of the calendar year immediately following the calendar year in which the Participant died, or by December 31 of the calendar year in which the Participant would have attained age 70 1/2, if later.

(2) If the Participant's surviving spouse is not the Participant's sole designated beneficiary, then distributions to the beneficiary will begin by December 31 of the calendar year immediately following the calendar year in which the Participant died.

(3) If there is no designated beneficiary as of September 30 of the year following the year of the Participant's death, the Participant's entire interest will be distributed by December 31 of the calendar year containing the fifth anniversary of the Participant's death.

(4) If the Participant's surviving spouse is the Participant's sole designated beneficiary and the surviving spouse dies after the Participant but before distributions to the surviving spouse begin, this Section 21.02(b), other than Section 21.02(b)(l), will apply as if the surviving spouse were the Participant.

For purposes of this Section 21.02(b) and Section 21.04, unless
Section 21.02(b)(4) applies, distributions are considered to begin on the Participant's required beginning date. If Section 21.02(b)(4) applies, distributions are considered to begin on the date distributions are required to begin to the surviving spouse under Section 21.02(b)(1). If distributions under an annuity purchased from an insurance company irrevocably commence to the Participant before the Participant's required beginning date (or to the Participant's surviving spouse before the date distributions are required to begin to the surviving spouse under Section 21.02(b)(1), the date distributions are considered to begin is the date distributions actually commence.

-91-

(c) Form of Distribution. Unless the Participant's interest is distributed in the form of an annuity purchased from an insurance company or in a single sum on or before the required beginning date, as of the first distribution calendar year, distributions will be made in accordance with Sections 21.03 and 21.04. If the Participant's interest is distributed in the form of an annuity purchased from an insurance company, distributions thereunder will be made in accordance with the requirements of Code section 401(a)(9) and the Treasury Regulations.

21.03. Required Minimum Distributions During Participant's Lifetime.

(a) Amount of Required Minimum Distribution For Each Distribution Calendar Year. During the Participant's lifetime, the minimum amount that will be distributed for each distribution calendar year is the lesser of:

(1) The quotient obtained by dividing the Participant's Account balance by the distribution period in the Uniform Lifetime Table set forth in ss. 1.401(a)(9)-9 of the Treasury Regulations, using the Participant's age as of the Participant's birthday in the distribution calendar year; or

(2) If the Participant's sole designated beneficiary for the distribution calendar year is the Participant's spouse, the quotient obtained by dividing the Participant's Account balance by the number in the Joint and Last Survivor Table set forth in ss. 1.401(a)(9)-9 of the Treasury Regulations, using the Participant's and spouse's attained ages as of the Participant's and spouse's birthdays in the distribution calendar year.

(b) Lifetime Required Minimum Distributions Continue Through Year of Participant's Death. Required minimum distributions will be determined under this Section 21.03 beginning with the first distribution calendar year and up to and including the distribution calendar year that includes the Participant's date of death.

21.04. Required Minimum Distributions After Participant's Death.

(a) Death On or After Date Distributions Begin.

(1) Participant Survived by Designated Beneficiary. If the Participant dies on or after the date distributions begin and there is a designated beneficiary, the minimum amount that will be distributed for each distribution calendar year after the year of the Participant's death is the quotient obtained by dividing the Participant's Account balance by the longer of the remaining life expectancy of the Participant or the remaining life expectancy of the Participant's designated Beneficiary, determined as follows:

-92-

(A) The Participant's remaining life expectancy is calculated using the age of the Participant in the year of death, reduced by one for each subsequent year.

(B) If the Participant's surviving spouse is the Participant's designated sole beneficiary, the remaining life expectancy of the surviving spouse is calculated for each distribution calendar year after the year of the Participant's death using the surviving spouse's age as of the spouse's birthday in that year. For distribution calendar years after the year of the surviving spouse's death, the remaining life expectancy of the surviving spouse is calculated using the age of the surviving spouse as of the spouse's birthday in the calendar year of the spouse's death, reduced by one for each subsequent calendar year.

(C) If the Participant's surviving spouse is not the Participant's sole designated beneficiary, the designated beneficiary's remaining life expectancy is calculated using the age of the beneficiary in the year following the year of the Participant's death, reduced by one for each subsequent year.

(2) No Designated Beneficiary. If the Participant dies on or after the date distributions begin and there is no designated beneficiary as of September 30 of the year after the year of the Participant's death, the minimum amount that will be distributed for each distribution calendar year after the year of the Participant's death is the quotient obtained by dividing the Participant's Account balance by the Participant's remaining life expectancy calculated using the age of the Participant in the year of death, reduced by one for each subsequent year. (b) Death Before Date Distributions Begin.

Unless a Participant or beneficiary elects to apply the Five-Year Rule pursuant to Section 21.05, the Participant's interest will be distributed as follows:

(1) Participant Survived by Designated Beneficiary. If the Participant dies before the date distributions begin and there is a designated beneficiary, the minimum amount that will be distributed for each distribution calendar year after the year of the Participant's death is the quotient obtained by dividing the Participant's Account balance by the remaining life expectancy of the Participant's designated beneficiary, determined as provided in Section 21.04(a).

(2) No Designated Beneficiary. If the Participant dies before the date distributions begin and there is no designated beneficiary as of September 30 of the year following the year of the Participant's death, distribution of the Participant's entire interest will be completed by

-93-

December 31 of the calendar year containing the fifth anniversary of the Participant's death.

(c) Death of Surviving Spouse Before Distributions to Surviving Spouse Are Required to Begin. If the Participant dies before the date distributions begin, the Participant's surviving spouse is the Participant's sole designated beneficiary, and the surviving spouse dies before distributions are required to begin to the surviving spouse under Section 21.02(b)(1), this Section 21.04(b) will apply as if the surviving spouse were the Participant.

21.05. Election of Five Year Rule.

A Participant or beneficiary may elect to apply the Five-Year Rule instead of the life expectancy rule of Section 21.02(b) or 21.04(b). The Participant or Beneficiary's election must be made no later than the earlier of September 30 of the calendar year in which distribution would be required to begin under Section 21.02(b); or by September 30 of the calendar year which contains the fifth anniversary of the Participant's (or, if applicable, surviving spouse's) death.

21.06. Definitions.

(a) Designated Beneficiary. A "designated beneficiary" is an individual who is designated as the beneficiary under Section 10.02 and is the designated beneficiary under Code section 401(a)(9) and ss. 1.401(a)(9)-1, Q&A-4, of the Treasury Regulations.

(b) Distribution Calendar Year. A "distribution calendar year" is the calendar year for which a minimum distribution is required. For distributions beginning before the Participant's death, the first distribution calendar year is the calendar year immediately preceding the calendar year which contains the Participant's required beginning date. For distributions beginning after the Participant's death, the first distribution calendar year is the calendar year in which distributions are required to begin under Section 21.02(b). The required minimum distribution for the Participant's first distribution calendar year will be made on or before the Participant's required beginning date. The required minimum distribution for other distribution calendar years, including the required minimum distribution for the distribution calendar year in which the Participant's required beginning date occurs, will be made on or before December 31 of that distribution calendar year.

(c) Five-Year Rule. The "Five-Year Rule" requires that a Participant's entire interest be distributed by December 31 of the calendar year containing the fifth anniversary of the Participant's death.

(d) Life Expectancy. "Life expectancy" is the life expectancy computed by use of the Single Life Table in ss. 1.401(a)(9)-9 of the Treasury Regulations.

-94-

(e) Participant's Account Balance. A Participant's "Account balance" is the Account balance as of the last valuation date in the calendar year immediately preceding the distribution calendar year (valuation calendar year) increased by the amount of any contributions made and allocated or forfeitures allocated to the Account balance as of dates in the valuation calendar year after the valuation date and decreased by distributions made in the valuation calendar year after the valuation date. The Account balance for the valuation calendar year includes any amounts rolled over or transferred to the Plan either in the valuation calendar y ear or in the distribution calendar year if distributed or transferred in the valuation calendar year.

(f) Required Beginning Date. The date specified in Section 10.01(b).

EXECUTION

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Guidant Corporation has caused this restated Plan document to be executed and adopted, effective January 1, 2003, except as otherwise provided in the Plan, on this day of , 2003.

GUIDANT CORPORATION

By:

Date:

-95-

ADDENDUM

Pursuant to Section 5.01 of the Plan, the Fund Advisory Committee has designated the following investment Fund options to be available for the investment of Participant's Salary Reduction Contributions.

The Stable Value Fund. The investment objective of the Stable Value Fund is to preserve principle while seeking a high level of current income. The Fund is designed to provide Participants with a higher return than typically offered by money markets while maintaining liquidity and safety of principle. The Fund generally invests in investment contracts issued by insurance companies, banks, and other financial institutions and will be diversified among many different institutions.

Large Company Value. The investment objective of the Large Company Value Fund is to outperform the Russell 1000 Value Index while maintaining below average volatility. The fund is a large company stock fund that seeks long-term growth and income by investing in a diversified portfolio of stocks that are thought to be under valued relative to their dividend income, the value of the underlying assets of the issuing corporation, and potential future return.

The S&P 500 Index Fund. The investment objective of the S&P 500 Index Fund is to match the investment performance of the U.S. stock market. The Fund invests in the securities that make up the S&P 500 Index, which includes 500 established companies of different sizes and sectors of the U.S. economy, resulting in a broadly diversified, mostly large company U.S. stock fund.

The Large Conwanv Growth Fund. The investment objective of The Large Company Stock Fund is to outperform the S&P 500 Index over a long term. The Fund seeks the highest possible level of consistent, sustainable growth by buying stocks of fundamentally strong, quality companies at prices below their estimated economic or intrinsic value. The strategy is to enhance and protect the fund by combining growth and value disciplines. The Fund is comprised of a select group of both U.S. and international stocks.

The International Stock Fund. The investment objective of The International Stock Fund is to seek long-term growth of capital and future income by investing primarily in the stocks of companies based outside the United States. The Fund normally invests in foreign and U.S./registered securities, as well as companies that target markets outside the United States. The Fund generally emphasizes strong, well-managed companies in Europe, Canada, Australia and the Far East.

Small Company Value Fund. The investment objective of the Small Company Value Fund is to provide superior long-term appreciation through the selection of under valued stocks. The Fund invests primarily in equity securities of small capitalization companies based in the United States. Its strategy is to create a portfolio of undervalued stocks that reflect the characteristics of the Russell 2000 Index.

The Real Estate Fund. The investment objective of The Real Estate Fund is to seek total return with equal emphasis on capital appreciation and current income. The Fund invests primarily in equity securities of real estate companies. Some of the securities include

-96-

common stocks, convertible securities, and preferred stocks. The Fund may invest, with limitations, the securities of foreign real estate companies.

Small Company Growth Fund. The investment objective of the Small Company Growth Fund is to provide 100% appreciation over 36 months. It seeks to meet this objective by investing in stocks of small and mid-cap companies that have records of high earnings growth and above average prospects for future earnings growth.

Horizon Portfolio Alternatives. The Horizon Portfolios are four pre-mixed balanced funds, each of which invests in the eight investment Funds described above, but with an asset allocation formula designed to suit a particular time horizon. Horizon Portfolio (A) will have a time horizon of 3 to 6 years; Horizon Portfolio (B) will have a time horizon of 6 to 12 years; Horizon Portfolio (C) will have a time horizon of 12 to 20 years; and Horizon Portfolio (D) will have a time horizon of 20 years. Each Horizon Portfolio will be diversified across and within asset classes. Each Horizon Portfolio will he periodically and automatically rebalanced to the target asset allocations determined by professional investment advisors. Horizon Portfolios are offered as an alternative to individual investment direction among the eight funds. A Participant or Beneficiary who invests in a Horizon Portfolio will not be permitted to invest in any of the eight investment Funds while invested in a Horizon Portfolio. In addition, a Participant or Beneficiary may not invest in more than one Horizon Portfolio at a time.

-97-

EXHIBIT 10.52

FIRST AMENDMENT OF THE GUIDANT
EMPLOYEE SAVINGS AND STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN
 
This First Amendment of The Guidant Employee Savings and Stock Ownership Plan (the “Plan”) is adopted by Guidant Corporation (the “Company”).

Background

A.           
The Company adopted the Plan, originally effective January 1, 1995, and most recently restated it in its entirety effective January 1, 2003.
B.           
The Company now wishes to amend the Plan.

Amendment

THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as of the dates set forth below:

1.            
Effective February 9, 2004, Section 1.01(a)(26)(x) is added to read as follows:

(x)   for Participants who began participation in the plan on February 9, 2004 and who, as of February 9, 2004, were employees of AFx, Inc., periods of employment that counted as service under the AFx 401(k) Plan.

2.            
Effective October 1, 2004, Section 5.08 is amended to read as follows:

5.08
Transferred Participant Loans .

To the extent that outstanding Participant loans under a Prior Savings Plan or the Endovascular Technologies, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan, the InControl 401(k) Plan, the Sulzer Medica USA Retirement Plan, the CardioThoracic Systems 401(K) Savings Plan or the AFx 401(k) Plan are transferred to or merged into this Plan, those loans shall be treated as investments of the Profit-Sharing Accounts of the Participant to whom they relate, subject to the terms and conditions of the plan under which they were made. Participant loan repayments shall be invested in accordance with the Participant’s investment election currently in effect for Salary Reduction Contributions.

3.            
Effective October 1, 2004, Section 6.01(a) is amended to read as follows:

(a)           
Salary Reduction Contributions . The Participant’s Salary Reduction Contributions to the Plan, including amounts attributable to salary reduction contributions under a Prior Savings Plan or the Endovascular Technologies, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan, the InControl 401(k) Plan, the Sulzer Medica USA Retirement Plan, the CardioThoracic Systems 401(K) Savings Plan or the AFx 401(k) Plan transferred to or merged into this Plan, and the earnings thereon:
 

 
 
 

 
4.            
Effective October 1, 2004, the first paragraph of Section 7.01 is amended to read as follows:

A Participant may withdraw a portion of monies accruing from his Salary Reduction Contributions and, if applicable, his salary redirection contributions under the Endovascular Technologies, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan, the InControl 401(k) Plan, the Sulzer Medica USA Retirement Plan, the CardioThoracic Systems 401(K) Savings Plan or the AFx 401(k) Plan transferred to this Plan, in accordance with the following rules:

5.            
Effective October 1, 2004, Section 9.01(a) is amended to read as follows:

(a)
Subject to such rules as the Employee Benefits Committee may from time to time prescribe, a Participant may make no more than one (1) withdrawal pursuant to either Article VII or Article VIII in any Plan Year. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, a Participant may make unlimited withdrawals pursuant to Article VII and Section 8.02(g) from the portion of his Profit-Sharing Account that is attributable to salary redirection contributions transferred from the AFx 401(k) Plan to the Plan.

6.            
Effective October 1, 2004, Section 10.01(a)(1)(A) is amended to read as follows:

A.                           
Amount of Payment . A Participant who resigned or is dismissed from employment and who has completed 5 years of Service as of such date shall be entitled to the entire value of his Participant’s Account. A Participant shall always be 100 percent vested in his Rollover Contributions Account. A Participant who has completed less than 5 years of Service shall be entitled to the value of his Salary Reduction Contributions and Employee Contributions to the Plan, plus the value of his salary reduction contributions and qualified matching contributions made under the Endovascular Technologies, Inc. 401(K) Savings Plan transferred to this Plan, plus the value of any amounts transferred from the CardioThoracic Systems 401(K) Savings Plan or the AFx 401(k) Plan to the Plan, plus his vested interest in the value of the Employer Contributions credited to his Participant’s Account. Such vested interest shall be determined by a percentage equal to 20 percent for each full year of Service.
 
 
 
 

 
7.            
Effective October 1, 2004, a new Section 14.19 is added to the Plan to read as follows:

14.19       
Transfer From AFx Plan . As soon as practicable on or after October 1, 2004, the Trust shall accept a transfer from the trust for the AFx 401(k) Plan (the “AFx Plan”) of amounts representing all of the assets of the AFx Plan. Amounts credited to the accounts of an individual under the AFx Plan shall be credited to a corresponding Participant Account for that individual under the Plan. To the extent required by applicable law, an amount transferred with respect to an individual, and the earnings accrued thereon following the transfer, will be separately accounted for under the Plan. Amounts transferred from the AFx Plan to this Plan as described in this Section are fully vested at all times.

8.            
Effective October 1, 2004, Section 14.20 is added to read as follows:

14.20       
Blackout Periods . If the Trust accepts a transfer of assets from the trust of another plan, the transfer may result in a period of time during which a Participant may not obtain a distribution or a loan of the transferred assets or direct the investment of the transferred assets (“blackout period”). During the blackout period, the transferred assets will be invested in the funds designated by the Employee Benefits Committee. The designated funds, as well as the date the blackout period is expected to end, shall be communicated to affected Participants in advance of the commencement of the period as required by ERISA. After the blackout period ends, the transferred assets will be invested in accordance with Article V.

This First Amendment of The Guidant Employee Savings and Stock Ownership Plan is signed by the duly authorized officer of Guidant Corporation on this 24 th day of September , 2004.


THE GUIDANT EMPLOYEES SAVINGS
AND STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN

/s/ Roger Marchetti                                    
Signature

Roger Marchetti                                         
Printed

VP, Human Resources                               
Title
EXHIBIT 10.53

SECOND AMENDMENT OF THE GUIDANT
EMPLOYEE SAVINGS AND STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN

This Second Amendment of The Guidant Employee Savings and Stock Ownership Plan (the “Plan”) is adopted by Guidant Corporation (the “Company”).

Background

A.           
The Company adopted the Plan, originally effective January 1, 1995, and most recently restated it in its entirety effective January 1, 2003.
B.           
The Plan has been amended by a First Amendment.
C.           
The Company wishes to amend the Plan further.

Amendment
 
THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as of July 22, 2004.

1.            
Section 10.01(a)(1)(A) is amended to read as follows:

(A)   Amount of Payment. A Participant who resigns or is dismissed from employment and who has completed 5 years of Service as of such date shall be entitled to the entire value of his Participant’s Account. A Participant shall always be 100 percent vested in his Rollover Contributions Account. A Participant who has completed less than 5 years of Service shall be entitled to the value of his Salary Reduction Contributions and Employee Contributions to the Plan, plus the value of his salary reduction contributions and qualified matching contributions made under the Endovascular Technologies, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan transferred to this Plan, plus the value of any amounts transferred from the CardioThoracic Systems 401(K) Savings Plan or the AFx 401(k) Plan to the Plan, plus his vested interest in the value of the Employer Contributions credited to his Participant’s Account. Such vested interest shall be determined by a percentage equal to 20 percent for each full year of Service. Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this paragraph, a Participant who is dismissed from employment as part of the “2004 reduction in force” shall be entitled to the entire value of his Participant’s Account, as though he had completed at least 5 years of Service at the time he is dismissed. For this purpose, a dismissal from employment is part of the 2004 reduction in force if it (1) is part of the reduction in the Company’s workforce undertaken in connection with the restructuring announced on July 22, 2004 and with respect to which affected Employees received termination notices issued during the period July 27, 2004 through August 13, 2004; or (2) occurs after July 22, 2004 in connection with the termination of the Company’s Houston radiation business.
 
This Second Amendment of The Guidant Employee Savings and Stock Ownership Plan is signed by the duly authorized officer of Guidant Corporation on this 20 th day of October , 2004.


                                                                                                GUIDANT CORPORATION

/s/ Roger Marchetti                            
Signature

Roger Marchetti                                
Printed

Vice President, Human Resources 
Title





EXHIBIT 10.54

THIRD AMENDMENT OF
THE GUIDANT EMPLOYEE SAVINGS AND STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN

This Third Amendment of The Guidant Employee Savings and Stock Ownership Plan (the “Plan”) is adopted by Guidant Corporation (the “Company”).

Background

A.           
The Company adopted the Plan, originally effective January 1, 1995, and most recently restated it in its entirety effective January 1, 2003.
 B.           
The Plan has been amended by a First Amendment and a Second Amendment.
C.           
The Company wishes to amend the Plan further.

Amendment
THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows:

1.            
Effective July 1, 2005, Section 1.01(a)(27) is amended to read as follows:

(27)   Shares. The term “shares” means shares of common stock of (A) Guidant Corporation, (B) a corporate successor to Guidant Corporation that, by operation of a merger, share exchange, or other corporate transaction, becomes the Participants’ employer, or (C) a member of the controlled group, within the meaning of Code section 414(b) or 414(c), of which such corporate successor is a member.

2.            
Effective January 1, 2005, Section 5.06(d) is redesignated as Section 5.06(e), and a new Section 5.06(d) is added to read as follows:

In accordance with procedures established by the Employee Benefits Committee, a Participant who has attained 50 years of age or has five or more Years of Service may elect at any time during a Plan Year to diversify up to 100% of that portion of his ESOP Account attributable to Matching Contributions (and attributable earnings) by investing that portion in the investment funds established pursuant to Section 5.01.

3.            
Effective March 28, 2005, a new Section 10.05 is added to read as follows:

10.05. Mandatory Cashout Threshold Lowered. Notwithstanding any other provisions of the Plan to the contrary, no amount exceeding $1,000 will be distributed to a Participant who has not reached Normal Retirement Age without the Participant’s written consent.
 
Guidant Corporation has caused this Third Amendment of The Guidant Employee Savings and Stock Ownership Plan to be executed by its duly authorized officer on this 27 th day of September , 2005.
 
GUIDANT CORPORATION

/s/ Roger Marchetti                                
Signature

Roger Marchetti                                      
Printed

Vice President, Human Resources        
Title
EXHIBIT 10.55
 
FOURTH AMENDMENT OF
THE GUIDANT EMPLOYEE SAVINGS AND STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN
 
This Fourth Amendment of The Guidant Employee Savings and Stock Ownership Plan ( Plan”) is adopted by Guidant Corporation (“Company”).
 

Background
 
A.
The Company adopted the Plan, which was originally effective January 1, 1995, and most recently restated it in its entirety effective January 1, 2003.
 
B.
The Company amended the Plan by a First Amendment, a Second Amendment, and a Third Amendment.
 
C.
The Company now wishes to amend the Plan further, effective March 18, 2006.

Amendment

1.       Section 1.01(a)(17)(A) is amended to read as follows:

The portion of a Participant s Account that is attributable to contributions made under the Profit-Sharing Plan including a Participant’s Profit-Sharing Account (or similar account) in a Prior Savings Plan that is transferred to or merged into this Plan, amounts transferred from the ESOP to the Profit-Sharing Plan pursuant to Section 5.06(b) or 19.14(b), and earnings thereon, shall be referred to as the Participant’s “Profit-Sharing Account.”
 
2.       Section 1.01(a)(27) is amended to read as follows:
 
Shares . The term “Shares” means shares of common stock of Guidant Corporation, except that, following the close of the merger pursuant to which Boston Scientific Corporation becomes sole shareholder (directly or indirectly) of Guidant Corporation, “Shares” shall mean shares of common stock of Boston Scientific Corporation or any successor.

3.       Section 5.06 (a) is amended to read as follows:
 
Subject to the provisions of Sections 5.06(b) and 19.14(b), Employer Contributions to the Plan shall be invested in a Fund held in Trust and consisting of Shares (commonly known as “the Company Stock Fund”).
 

While Employer Contributions will initially be invested in the Company Stock Fund, each Participant will have the diversification rights described in Section 5.06(b) and Section 19.14(b). The Trustee shall purchase Shares for the Company Stock Fund in the open market or by private purchase, including purchase from the Company. Any such purchase from the Company shall be at a price per Share not in excess of the mean between the highest and lowest quoted selling price per Share for a 100 Share lot on the composite tape of New York Stock Exchange issues on the date of purchase by the Trustee.
 
4.        Sections 5.06(c) and (d) are deleted, Section 5.06 (e) is re-designated as Section 5.06(c), and Section 5.06(b) is amended to read as follows:
 
In accordance with procedures established by the Employee Benefits Committee, each Participant, and each Beneficiary of a deceased Participant, shall be entitled to transfer all or any portion of his Participant’s Account invested in the Company Stock Fund to one or more of the Funds established pursuant to Section 5.01. In the event the Participant makes such a diversification election with respect to any portion of his ESOP Account, that election will have the effect of permanently transferring the Participant’s Units that are subject to the election from the ESOP to the Profit-Sharing Plan, and the Units (i) will thereafter be assets exclusively of the Profit-Sharing Plan, and (ii) cannot, under any circumstances, be transferred from the Profit-Sharing Plan back to the ESOP. An amount transferred from the Company Stock Fund to another Fund or Funds pursuant to this Section 5.06 shall subsequently be subject to the rules that apply under this Article V to the reinvestment of Salary Reduction Contributions.
 
5.       The second to last and third to last paragraphs of Section 6.01 are amended to read as follows:
 
A Participant’s Profit-sharing Account shall comprise the amounts described in Section 6.01(a) through (d) above, plus any amounts transferred from the Participant’s ESOP Account to his Profit- Sharing Account pursuant to Sections 19.14 (b) or 5.06(b). A Participant’s ESOP Account shall comprise the amounts described in Section 6.01(e) through (g) above, reduced by any amounts transferred from the Participant’s ESOP Account to his Profit Sharing Account pursuant to Sections 19.14(b) or 5.06(b).

6.       Section 10.01(d) is deleted.

7.       The second paragraph of Section 11.02 is amended to read as follows:


This Section 11.02 shall apply to withdrawals under Article VIII and Section 19.14 of the Plan and to distributions under Article X (including a distribution of the portion of a Participant’s Account invested in a Plan loan and the promissory note evidencing the loan) and Section 19.13 of the Plan.

8.       The heading of Section 18.02 is re-designated as “ Investment of  PAYSOP Account ,” and the text of that section is amended to read as follows:
 
Each Participant’s PAYSOP Account shall be invested in the Company Stock Fund, but with respect to his PAYSOP Account the Participant shall have the diversification rights described in Section 5.06(b). Any diversification election a Participant makes with respect to his PAYSOP Account pursuant to Section 5.06(b) will have the effect of permanently transferring the Participant’s Units that are subject to the election to the Profit-Sharing Plan, and the Units will thereafter be assets exclusively of the Profit-Sharing Plan.
 
9.       Section 19.14(b) is amended to read as follows:
 
Diversification . With respect to his ESOP Account, each Participant shall have the diversification rights described in Section 5.06(b). Any diversification election a Participant makes pursuant to Section 5.06(b) shall have the effect of permanently transferring the Participant’s Units that are subject to the election from the ESOP to the Profit-Sharing Plan, and the Units will thereafter be assets exclusively of the Profit-Sharing Plan, and cannot, under any circumstances, be transferred from the Profit-Sharing Plan back to the ESOP.
 



Guidant Corporation has caused this Fourth Amendment of The Guidant Employee Savings and Stock Ownership Plan to be executed by its duly authorized officer on this 24th day of March, 2006.
 

 
 
GUIDANT CORPORATION
 
By:

 
 

Printed Name
 

Title
 
EXHIBIT 10.56

 
FIFTH AMENDMENT OF
 
THE GUIDANT EMPLOYEE SAVINGS AND STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN
 
This Fifth Amendment of The Guidant Employee Savings and Stock Ownership Plan ( Plan ) is adopted by Guidant Corporation (“Company”).
 
Background
 
A.    The Company established the Plan effective January 1, 1995, and most recently restated the Plan in its entirety effective January 1, 2003.
 
B.    The Company has amended the January 1, 2003 restatement of the Plan by a First, Second, Third and Fourth Amendment.
 
C.    The Company now wishes to amend the Plan further to make a top-paid group election under Code section 414(q)(1)(B)(ii), provide for the contribution of qualified nonelection contributions to satisfy Code section 401(k)(3), and to reflect the changes identified in IRS Notice 2005-101, including the final regulations under Code sections 401(k) and 401(m).
 
Amendment
 
Therefore, effective January 1, 2006 except as otherwise provided, the Plan is amended as follows:
 
1.    Section 3.03(b)(1)(A)(ii) is amended to read as follows:
 
 
(ii)
An Employee who received compensation in excess of $80,000 (as adjusted pursuant to Code section 415(d)) during the preceding Plan Year and was in the top-paid group of employees for the preceding Plan Year.
 
2.    The last paragraph of Section 3.03(b) is amended to read as follows:
 
If any highly compensated Employee is a Participant under two (2) or more qualified cash or deferred arrangements (as defined in Code section 401(k)) of the Employer or an affiliate, for purposes of determining the actual deferral percentage for any such Employee for a Plan Year, all salary reduction contributions under all such qualified cash
 
 
 

 
or deferred arrangements in the same Plan Year shall be taken into account.
 
3.    Section 3.06 is amended by adding a new subsection (i) to read as follows:
 
 
(i)
Qualified Nonelective Contributions to Correct Excess Salary Reduction Contributions . In lieu of, or in combination with, the distribution of Excess Salary Reduction Contributions under Section 3.04(b) to satisfy the limitation described at Section 3.03(a), any Employer may make a qualified nonelective contribution (“QNEC”) to the Plan on behalf of one or more Employees who are not highly compensated Employees (as defined in Section 3.03) to cause the limitation to be satisfied. The QNEC made on behalf of an Employee shall be allocated to the Employee’s Participant’s Account and shall be considered a Salary Reduction Contribution for all Plan purposes, except that an Employee may not withdraw it solely on account of a hardship.
 
4.    Section 7.01(b)(1) is amended to read as follows:
 
 
(1)
Hardship withdrawals shall be approved, on a case-by-case basis and in view of all relevant facts and circumstances, only if needed to satisfy an immediate and heavy financial need that is on account of one of the following:
 
 
(A)
Expenses for (or necessary to obtain) medical care that would be deductible under Code section 213(d) (determined without regard to whether the expenses exceed 7.5% of adjusted gross income);

 
(B)
Costs directly related to the purchase of a principal residence for the Participant (excluding mortgage payments);

 
(C)
Payment of tuition, related educational fees, and room and board expenses, for up to the next 12 months of post-secondary education for the Participant, or the Participant s spouse, children or dependents (as defined in Code section 152 and, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2005, without regard to Code sections 152(b)(1), (b)(2) and (d)(1)(B));

 
(D)
Payments necessary to prevent the eviction of the Participant from the Participant’s principal residence or foreclosure on the mortgage on that residence;

 
(E)
Payments for burial or funeral expenses for the Participant’s deceased parent, spouse, children or dependents (as defined in
 
 
-2-

 
 
 
Code section 152 and, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2005, without regard to Code section 152(d)(1)(B)); or
 
 
(F)
Expenses for the repair of damage to the Participant’s principal residence that would qualify for the casualty deduction under Code section 165 (determined without regard to whether the loss exceeds 10% of adjusted gross income).

Guidant Corporation has caused this Fifth Amendment of The Guidant Employee Savings and Stock Ownership Plan to be executed by its duly authorized officer on this __________ day of ___________________, 2006.
 
 
 
GUIDANT CORPORATION



By:


 
Printed Name
 
 
Title  


 
 
 
-3-

 
EXHIBIT 12
 
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(unaudited)
 
                   
 
 
 
                     
 
                     
 
                     
                       
(in millions)
 
2006
 
2005
 
2004
 
2003
 
2002
 
Fixed charges
                     
Interest expense and debt issuance costs
 
 
435
   
90
   
64
   
46
   
43
 
Interest portion of rental expense
   
16
   
13
   
10
   
10
   
11
 
Total fixed charges
   
451
   
103
   
74
   
56
   
54
 
                                 
Earnings
                               
(Loss) income before income taxes
   
(3,535
)
 
891
   
1,494
   
643
   
549
 
Fixed charges per above
   
451
   
103
   
74
   
56
   
54
 
Equity in losses of equity investees
   
28
   
9
   
3
             
Total (deficit) earnings, adjusted
   
(3,056
)
 
1,003
   
1,571
   
699
   
603
 
                                 
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (a)
          
9.74
   
21.23
   
12.48
   
11.17
 
 
 
(a) For 2006, the ratio was less than 1.0 and was deficient by approximately $3.1 billion.
 
The calculation above relates to the $3.05 billion of registered debt securities that we have outstanding at December 31, 2006. See Note F - Borrowings and Credit Arrangements to our 2006 consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further information regarding the debt securities.
 
EXHIBIT 21
List of world-wide subsidiaries for Boston Scientific


Advanced Bionics Corporation (Delaware)
Advanced Bionics GmbH (Germany)
Advanced Bionics Japan Company Ltd. (Japan)
Advanced Bionics NV (Belgium)
Advanced Bionics SARL (France)
Advanced Bionics SL (Spain)
Advanced Bionics UK Ltd. (England)
Advanced Stent Technologies, Inc. (Delaware)
AFx, Inc. (California)
AMS Medinvent S.A. (Switzerland)
Arter Re Insurance Company, Ltd. (Bermuda)
B.I.C. Insurance Company of Vermont, Inc. (Vermont)
BSC Capital S.à r.l. (Luxembourg)
BSC International Holding Limited (Ireland)
BSC International Medical Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (China)
BSM Tip Gerecleri Limited Sirketi (Turkey)
Boston Scientific (2001) Ltd. (Israel)
Boston Scientific (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. (Malaysia)
Boston Scientific (South Africa) (Proprietary) Limited (South Africa)
Boston Scientific (Thailand) Ltd. (Thailand)
Boston Scientific (UK) Limited (England)
Boston Scientific (Zurich) GmbH (Switzerland)
Boston Scientific AG (Switzerland)
Boston Scientific Alajuela BSCA, S.R.L. (Costa Rica)
Boston Scientific Argentina S.A. (Argentina)
Boston Scientific Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. (Singapore)
Boston Scientific B.V. (The Netherlands)
Boston Scientific Benelux B.V. (The Netherlands)
Boston Scientific Benelux NV (Belgium)
Boston Scientific Bulgaria EOOD (Bulgaria)
Boston Scientific Capital(UK) (England)
 
 
 

 
Boston Scientific Capital Japan Nin-I Kumiai (Japan)
Boston Scientific Ceska repulika s.r.o. (Czech Republic)
Boston Scientific Colombia Limitada (Colombia)
Boston Scientific Cork Limited (Ireland)
Boston Scientific Corporation Northwest Technology Center, Inc. (Washington)
Boston Scientific Danmark ApS (Denmark)
Boston Scientific del Caribe, Inc. (Puerto Rico)
Boston Scientific Distribution Company (Ireland)
Boston Scientific Distribution Ireland Limited (Ireland)
Boston Scientific Eastern Europe B.V. (The Netherlands)
Boston Scientific Europe S.P.R.L. (Belgium)
Boston Scientific Far East B.V. (The Netherlands)
Boston Scientific Foundation, Inc. (Massachusetts)
Boston Scientific Funding LLC (Delaware)
Boston Scientific Ges.m.b.H. (Austria)
Boston Scientific Glens Falls Corp. (Delaware)
Boston Scientific Hellas S.A. - Minimally Invasive Medical Instruments (Greece)
Boston Scientific Holland B.V. (The Netherlands)
Boston Scientific Hong Kong Limited (Hong Kong)
Boston Scientific Hungary Trading Limited Liability Company (Hungary)
Boston Scientific Iberica, S.A. (Spain)
Boston Scientific International B.V. (The Netherlands)
Boston Scientific International Distribution Limited (Ireland)
Boston Scientific International Finance Limited (Ireland)
Boston Scientific International Holding B.V. (The Netherlands)
Boston Scientific International Holding Limited (Ireland)
Boston Scientific International S.A. (France)
Boston Scientific Ireland Limited (Ireland)
Boston Scientific Israel Limited (Israel)
Boston Scientific Japan K.K. (Japan)
Boston Scientific Korea Co., Ltd. (Korea)
Boston Scientific Latin America B.V. (The Netherlands)
Boston Scientific Latin America B.V. (Chile) Limitada (Chile)
Boston Scientific Lebanon SAL (Lebanon)
 
 
 

 
Boston Scientific Limited (England)
Boston Scientific Limited (Ireland)
Boston Scientific Ltd. (Canada)
Boston Scientific Medizintechnik GmbH (Germany)
Boston Scientific Miami Corporation (Florida)
Boston Scientific Middle East SAL (Offshore) (Lebanon)
Boston Scientific Mountain View Corp. (Delaware)
Boston Scientific New Zealand Limited (New Zealand)
Boston Scientific Norge AS (Norway)
Boston Scientific Sverige AB (Sweden)
Boston Scientific Panama S.A. (Panama)
Boston Scientific Philippines, Inc. (Philippines)
Boston Scientific Polska Sp. z o.o. (Poland)
Boston Scientific Pty. Ltd. (Australia)
Boston Scientific S.A. (France)
Boston Scientific S.p.A. (Italy)
Boston Scientific S.à r.l. (Luxembourg)
Boston Scientific Santa Rosa Corp. (California)
Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. (Minnesota)
Boston Scientific Suomi Oy (Finland)
Boston Scientific Technologie Zentrum GmbH (Germany)
Boston Scientific TIP Gerecleri Limited Sirketi (Turkey)
Boston Scientific Tullamore Limited (Ireland)
Boston Scientific Uruguay S.A. (Uruguay)
Boston Scientific Wayne Corporation (New Jersey)
Boston Scientific de Costa Rica S.R.L. (Costa Rica)
Boston Scientific de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)
Boston Scientific de Venezuela, C.A. (Venezuela)
Boston Scientific do Brasil Ltda. (Brazil)
Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. (Minnesota)
CardioThoracic Systems, Inc. (Delaware)
Catheter Innovations, Inc. (Delaware)
Corvita Corporation (Florida)
 
 
 

 
Corvita Europe S.A. (Belgium)
CryoVascular Systems, Inc. (Delaware)
EndoTex Interventional Systems, Inc. (Delaware)
EndoVascular Technologies, Inc., (Delaware)
Enteric Medical Technologies, Inc. (Delaware)
EP Technologies, Inc. (Delaware)
Forwich Limited (Ireland)
Guidant (Thailand) Ltd. (Thailand)
Guidant AG (Switzerland)
Guidant Aparelhos Medicos, Lda. (Portugal)
Guidant Australia Pty. Ltd. (Australia)
Guidant Belgium NV (Belgium)
Guidant Canada Corporation (Canada)
Guidant Corporation (Indiana)
Guidant CR s.r.o. (Czech Republic)
Guidant Denmark A/S (Denmark)
Guidant Europe NV (Belgium)
Guidant Foundation (Indiana)
Guidant France S.A.S. (France)
Guidant GmbH (Germany)
Guidant Group B.V. (Netherlands)
Guidant Holdings, Inc. (Indiana)
Guidant Holdings B.V. (Netherlands)
Guidant Holdings C.V. (Netherlands)
Guidant Hong Kong Limited. (Hong Kong)
Guidant India Private Limited (India)
Guidant International B.V. (Netherlands)
Guidant Intercontinental Corporation (Indiana)
Guidant Investment Corporation (California)
Guidant Italia S.r.l. (Italy)
Guidant Japan K.K. (Japan)
Guidant Limited (England)
 
 
 

 
Guidant Luxembourg S.a r.l. (Luxembourg)
Guidant Nederland B.V. (Netherlands)
Guidant Norway AS (Norway)
Guidant Österreich G.m.b.H. (Austria)
Guidant Puerto Rico B.V. (Netherlands)
Guidant Puerto Rico Sales Corporation (Texas)
Guidant, S.A. (Spain)
Guidant Sales Corporation (Indiana)
Guidant Singapore Pte. Ltd. (Singapore)
Guidant Sweden AB (Sweden)
Guidant do Brasil Ltda.(in dormancy) (Brazil)
InControl Europe NV (in liquidation) (Belgium)
Intermedics, Inc. (Delaware)
Intermedics Electromedicina, S.A. (Spain)
InterVentional Technologies Europe Limited (Ireland)
Interventional Technologies, LLC (Delaware)
Medical Research Products A (California)
Nilo Holding SA (Switzerland)
Norse Ventures B.V. (The Netherlands)
Origin Medsystems, Inc. (Delaware )
Precision Vascular Systems, Inc. (Utah)
Rubicon Medical Corporation (Delaware)
Rubicon Medical, Inc. (Utah)
Schneider (Europe) GmbH (Switzerland)
Schneider Belgium N.V. (Belgium)
Schneider Puerto Rico (Delaware)
Smart Therapeutics, Inc. (Delaware)
Stream Enterprises LLC (Delaware)
Target Therapeutics, Inc. (Delaware)

Structure of ownership and control:
Boston Scientific wholly owns or has a majority interest in all of the aforementioned entities.
 
 
 

 
EXHIBIT 23

 
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-111047, 333-98755, 333-76380, 333-61056, 333-61060, 33-57242, 33-89772, 33-93790, 333-25033, 333-25037, 333-36636, 333-134932, 333-133569, and 333-131608; Form S-3 Nos. 333-76346, 333-61994, 333-37255, 333-64887, 333-64991, 333-119412 and 333-132626; and Form S-4 Nos. 333-131608 and 333-22581) of Boston Scientific Corporation and in the related Prospectuses of our reports dated February 26, 2007, with respect to consolidated financial statements and schedule of Boston Scientific Corporation, Boston Scientific Corporation management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Boston Scientific Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006.




/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
 
Boston, Massachusetts
February 26, 2007
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, James R. Tobin, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Boston Scientific Corporation;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The registrant s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)     Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)       Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)      All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 1, 2007
 
 
/s/ James R. Tobin                                  
James R. Tobin
President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Lawrence C. Best, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Boston Scientific Corporation;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The registrant s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)      Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)       Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.      The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 1, 2007
 
 
/s/ Lawrence C. Best                         
Lawrence C. Best
Executive Vice President—Finance & Administration and Chief Financial Officer

 
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Boston Scientific Corporation (the Company ) for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report ), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on his knowledge:

(1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Boston Scientific Corporation.
 
By:
 
 
/s/ James R. Tobin                         
 
 
 
 
James R. Tobin
President and Chief Executive Officer
 
 

 
 
 
 
March 1, 2007
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Boston Scientific Corporation (the Company ) for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report ), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on his knowledge:

(1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Boston Scientific Corporation.
 
By:
 
 
/s/ Lawrence C. Best                                
 
 
 
 
Lawrence C. Best
Executive Vice President—Finance & Administration
and Chief Financial Officer
 
 

 
 
 
March 1, 2007