PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

4

5

SWEEGEN, INC.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2017

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Throughout this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the terms “SWEE”, “Registrant,” “we,” “us,” “our,” and “the Company” refer to SweeGen, Inc., a Nevada corporation that was formerly known as Aceway Corp. prior to its name change in December 2014. The term “Business Commencement” refers to the date the Company commenced business operations (December 5, 2014).

The Company is a development stage business-to-business company dedicated to the development, production and distribution of nature-based, non-caloric sweeteners for the food, flavor and beverage industries. The Company’s robust product pipeline, intellectual property portfolio, and manufacturing resources in Asia provide the Company with its foundation for innovation and delivery of high-quality sweeteners. In response to increasing global sugar reduction demand, the Company intends to seek, develop and acquire, completely or a substantial interest in, companies or assets that would benefit from or that can be developed using the knowledge and expertise of the Company’s management resources.

The Company’s most significant recent business development is the commercialization of high purity stevia sweetener products known as Rebaudioside M and Rebaudioside D (the “Products”). Major achievements include:

 January 2017: a customer of the Company began using the Rebaudioside M Product in a bottled beverage trial.  

 February 2017: the U.S. FDA issued a GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe) No Objection Letter for the Company’s Rebaudioside M Product.  

 July 2017: the Company’s Rebaudioside D Product obtained self-confirmed GRAS status.  

 July 2017: the Company’s Rebaudioside M Product received regulatory approval in Canada. 

 August 2017: the Company’s Rebaudioside M Product received Non-GMO Project Verification.  

 October 2017: the U.S. FDA issued a GRAS No Objection Letter for the Company’s Rebaudioside D Product. 

 October 2017: the Company’s Rebaudioside M Product received regulatory approval in Mexico. 

On April 17, 2016, the Company received a $2,000,000 earnest money deposit from Ingredion Incorporated (“Ingredion”) in connection with the parties’ discussions of potential business initiatives and developments. In addition, the Company issued two warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share. Each warrant provided Ingredion the right to acquire 0.33% of the Company’s total outstanding common stock on the exercise date, for a total of 0.66% of the total outstanding common stock on the exercise date, equal to 167,219 shares of common stock. The Company recorded a $2,000,000 liability as of June 30, 2016 for this earnest money deposit.

On November 28, 2016, the Ingredion business relationship agreements were finalized with the execution of a 5-year distribution agreement (the “Distribution Agreement”), in which Ingredion will serve as the Company’s global distributor for the Products. Pursuant to the terms of the Distribution Agreement, Ingredion will serve as the exclusive distributor of the Products other than to the Company’s intended in-house accounts (the “House Accounts”) and other than within the People’s Republic of China (the “PRC”). Ingredion will serve as a non-exclusive distributor of the Products in the PRC.

On November 29, 2016, Ingredion exercised the warrants to purchase 167,219 shares of the Company’s $.001 par value common stock. As such, the $2,000,000 earnest money deposit liability was eliminated and a deferred revenue liability was established in the amount of $1,999,833, to be recorded as revenue over the 5-year term of the Distribution Agreement. The remaining $167.00 was used as consideration for the exercise of the warrants and recorded to common stock for the par value of the 167,219 shares of common stock that Ingredion purchased. As discussed in the Company’s 10-K dated June 30, 2017 (Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements), in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2017 the Company corrected the accounting treatment to record the $2,000,000 as a sale of equity. As such, the Deferred Revenue Liability of $1,865,050 as of March 31, 2017, Revenue amounts of $36,161 recorded in the second quarter of 2017 and $98,622 recorded in the third quarter of 2017 were reclassified to Additional Paid In Capital in the total amount of $1,999,833.

On April 21, 2017, the Company’s majority shareholder (the “Majority Shareholder”) transferred 850,115 shares of common stock to Amyris, Inc. in satisfaction of a $10,000,000 debt that one of the Majority Shareholder’s wholly owned companies owed to Amyris.

On August 11, 2017, the Company completed a private placement sale of 140,127 shares of its common stock, $0.001 par value per share, generating proceeds of $1,648,318.

6

On August 16, 2017, the Company entered into a Stevia Sweetener Business Separation Binding Term Sheet (the “Term Sheet”) with Phyto Tech Corp. d/b/a Blue California (“Blue California”), a corporation controlled by the Company’s Majority Shareholder. Pursuant to the Term Sheet, the parties agreed to certain transfers and licenses to consolidate substantially all Rebaudioside A, Rebaudioside M, and potentially Rebaudioside D related tangible and intangible assets and manufacturing resources in the Company. The Company and Blue California intend to enter into one or more additional agreements to more fully set forth the terms and conditions of the transactions (the “Closing Documents”), which will supersede the Term Sheet, but intend that the Term Sheet be binding. The Closing Documents shall contain such terms and conditions as the parties may mutually agree, including standard representations, warranties and covenants. All pricing in the Closing Documents shall be based upon a valuation performed by an independent third-party valuation firm mutually selected by the parties, and the valuation firm shall determine the outcome of any pricing disputes not resolved by the 65th day following the date of the Term Sheet, which the Company and Blue California later agreed to extend beyond the originally agreed 65th day following the date of the Term Sheet. In addition, the Company agrees to include in the Closing Documents a grant to its affiliate manufacturer in Asia of a non-exclusive, non-transferable and non-sublicensable sub-license to use all the existing know-how, patent registrations, patent applications and other proprietary technologies for the purpose of manufacturing of the Products in the territory of such manufacturer’s domicile of entity organization only for sale to the Company or the Company’s designated customers.

On August 16, 2017, the Company and another company owned by the Majority Shareholder (“Conagen”) entered into a First Amendment to Inter-Company Patent License Agreement dated November 28, 2016 (the “Amendment”). The Amendment expands the field of use from flavoring for foods and beverages to use as flavors or sweeteners in food and beverages. The Amendment also altered the royalty structure, eliminating the annual $2,000,000 minimum royalty requirement and adding an annual $15,000,000 maximum royalty limitation. The royalty calculation also changed from a tiered system of royalty percentages that decline annually to a flat 5% royalty on net sales. Royalty payments were also revised from semi-annual payments due within 60 days of the end of each royalty period to annual payments based upon the Company’s fiscal year due within 90 days of the end of each royalty period.

In July, 2017 the Company commenced shipping products for revenues. Based on available customer consent, and in connection with the closing of definitive documents of the contemplated Term Sheet, certain purchase orders were placed with the Company. As further described in Note 6, Related Party Transactions, most of the inventory associated with such purchase orders was purchased from Blue California and subsequently shipped to customers. In the future the Company intends to purchase this material directly from the manufacturer for purchase order fulfillment.

Revenue

The Company recognizes operating revenues at the time title to the goods and all risks of ownership transfer to the customer. This transfer is considered complete when a sales agreement is in place, delivery has occurred, pricing is fixed or determinable and collection is reasonably assured.

Cost of Goods Sold

Cost of Goods Sold includes cost of materials provided by external manufacturers. As discussed in Note 6 – Related Party Transactions, these materials are purchased from companies owned by the Majority Shareholder.

The Company has entered into royalty agreements with a third party and with Conagen (see Note 1, the Amendment). Royalty expenses related to these agreements are included in Cost of Goods Sold.

Inventories

Inventory is carried at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is computed using the average cost method which approximates the first-in, first-out method.

Basic net loss per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share include additional dilution from common stock equivalents, such as stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of stock options and warrants. The Company did not have any potentially dilutive securities, such as options or warrants, issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2017. Common stock equivalents totaling 167,220 (warrants issued to Ingredion Inc. on April 17, 2016 and outstanding on September 30, 2016) were not included in the diluted earnings per share in the September 2016 consolidated statement of operations due to the fact that the Company reported a net loss in fiscal year 2017 and to do so would be anti-dilutive for that period.

Share-based Expenses

Share-based payment transactions include incurring liabilities or issuing or offering to issue shares, options or other equity instruments such as employee stock ownership plans and stock appreciation rights. Share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, are recognized as compensation expense in the consolidated financial statements based on their fair values. That expense is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award, known as the requisite service period (usually the vesting period).

There were no share-based expenses for the period from Business Commencement to September 30, 2017.

8

Deferred Income Taxes and Valuation Allowance

Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the consolidated financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period the enactment occurs. A valuation allowance is provided for certain deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize tax assets through future operations. No net deferred tax assets or liabilities were recognized as of September 30, 2017 and June 30, 2017.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

The Company's financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk primarily consist of its cash and cash equivalents and related party payables it will likely incur in the near future. The Company places its cash with financial institutions of high credit worthiness. At times, its cash with a particular financial institution may exceed any applicable government insurance limits. The Company's management plans to assess the financial strength and credit worthiness of any parties to which it extends funds, and as such, it believes that any associated credit risk exposures are limited.

The Company’s current sales are primarily concentrated with our global distributor, Ingredion. Sales to Ingredion represent 98% of the total sales for the three months ended September 30, 2017, and include shipments to the U.S. and other international locations. Ingredion also represents 98% of the Company’s Accounts Receivable balance at September 30, 2017.

The Company evaluates customer credit quality on a case-by-case basis, and if warranted, intends to establish an allowance for amounts for which collection is considered doubtful. For the three months ended September 30, 2017, most of the shipment activity is with Ingredion, the Company’s global distributor, and therefore deemed a low credit risk. No allowance for doubtful accounts has been established as of September 30, 2017.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. U.S. GAAP establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied that requires the use of fair value measurements, which establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements.

U.S. GAAP defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Additionally, ASC 820 requires the use of valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. These inputs are prioritized below:

The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities approximate their estimated fair market value based on the short-term maturity of this instrument.

Related Parties

The Company maintains procedures for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions. As discussed in Note 6 – Related Party Transactions, the Company has business relationships with companies owned by the Majority Shareholder, and the Company will occasionally record short-term liabilities resulting from these business transactions. All amounts loaned to the Company are non-interest bearing and due upon demand. On September 30, 2017 and June 30, 2017, the Company owed $416,952 and $186,514, respectively, to companies owned by the Majority Shareholder.

Commitments and Contingencies

Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment can be reasonably estimated. There were no commitments or contingencies as of September 30, 2017.

9

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” The revenue recognition standard affects all entities that have contracts with customers, except for certain items. The new revenue recognition standard eliminates the transaction-and industry-specific revenue recognition guidance under current U.S. GAAP and replaces it with a principle-based approach for determining revenue recognition. As amended, public entities are required to adopt the revenue recognition standard for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim reporting periods thereafter. Early adoption is not permitted for public entities. As such, the Company will first implement this standard effective July 1, 2018. As the Company has only recently begun to generate revenue, management has not yet evaluated the effect of implementing this new guidance.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases”. The new standard establishes a right-of-use (“ROU”) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. Although the Company is not currently engaged in any lease agreement, management will evaluate the potential impact of the adoption of this standard prior to July 1, 2019, as applicable to any potential lease arrangement the Company considers.

Subsequent Events

The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date of issuance of this filing.

NOTE 3 - GOING CONCERN

The Company's consolidated financial statements are prepared using U.S. GAAP applicable to a going concern, which contemplate the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company had an accumulated deficit of $2,700,615 as of September 30, 2017 and has working capital of $940,998 as of September 30, 2017. The Company has not established an ongoing source of revenues sufficient to cover its operating costs and requires additional capital to proceed with its operating plan. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company obtaining adequate capital to fund operating losses until it becomes profitable. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate capital, it could be forced to cease operations. These factors raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.

In order to continue as a going concern, the Company will need, among other things, additional capital resources. Management's plan to obtain such resources for the Company may include: product sales; sales of equity instruments; traditional financing, such as loans; and obtaining capital from management and significant stockholders sufficient to meet its operating expenses. For example, the Company began to ship products to customers this period, and on August 11, 2017, the Company completed a private placement sale of its common stock, generating proceeds of $1,648,318 (see Note 1). However, management cannot provide any assurance that the Company will be successful in accomplishing all of its plans.

There is no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain sufficient additional funds when needed or that such funds, if available, will be obtainable on terms satisfactory to the Company. The obtainment of financing, the successful development of the Company’s contemplated plan of operations, or its transition, ultimately, to the attainment of profitable operations are necessary for the Company to continue operations. The ability to successfully resolve these factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements of the Company do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of these aforementioned uncertainties.

10

NOTE 4 - EQUITY

Authorized Stock

The Company’s Articles of Incorporation authorize 75,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001 per share. Each share of common stock entitles the holder to one vote, in person or proxy, on any matter on which action of the stockholders of the Company is sought.

Common Shares

On August 11, 2017, the Company completed a private placement sale of 140,127 shares of its common stock. In fiscal year 2017, the Company issued 167,219 shares of its common stock in connection with the Ingredion transaction (Note 1). The Company effectively had 25,643,580 and 25,503,453 common shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2017 and June 30, 2017, respectively. The Company currently has no warrants outstanding.

Preferred shares

No preferred shares have been authorized or issued.

Stock Options

The Company has no outstanding stock options and does not have any outstanding rights to acquire securities.

NOTE 5 - PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES

The Company is subject to taxation in the United States and certain state jurisdictions. The Company has not taken any uncertain tax positions, but has open tax years subject to audit by the Internal Revenue Services for the years beginning in 2013.

Due to the change in ownership provisions of the income tax laws of United States of America, net operating loss carry forwards for federal income tax reporting purposes are subject to annual limitations. When a change in ownership occurs, net operating loss carry forwards may be limited as to use in future years.

The provision for income taxes differs from the amounts that would be provided by applying the statutory federal income tax rate of 34% to the net loss before provision for income taxes due primarily to changes in the valuation allowance to fully reserve net deferred tax assets. Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon sufficient future taxable income during the period that deductible temporary differences and carry-forwards are expected to be available to reduce taxable income. As the achievement of required future taxable income is uncertain, the Company recorded a valuation allowance. The Company has not recorded a provision for income taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 since the Company has had net operating losses since Business Commencement.

Due to uncertainties surrounding the Company's ability to generate future taxable income to realize deferred income tax assets arising as a result of net operating losses carried forward, the Company has not recorded any deferred income tax asset as of September 30, 2017 and 2016. The Company has an operating loss of $2,699,110 since Business Commencement. The net operating loss carryforwards will begin to expire in varying amounts from year 2033, subject to its eligibility as determined by respective tax regulating authorities.

11

Net deferred tax assets consist of the following components as of:

NOTE 6 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On August 16, 2017, the Company entered into a Stevia Sweetener Business Separation Binding Term Sheet (the “Term Sheet”) with Phyto Tech Corp. d/b/a Blue California (“Blue California”), a corporation majority owned by the Company’s Majority Shareholder. Pursuant to the Term Sheet, the parties agreed to certain transfers and licenses to consolidate substantially all Rebaudioside A, Rebaudioside M, and potentially Rebaudioside D related tangible and intangible assets and manufacturing resources in the Company. The Company and Blue California intend to enter into one or more additional agreements to more fully set forth the terms and conditions of the transactions (the “Closing Documents”), which will supersede the Term Sheet, but intend that the Term Sheet be binding. The Closing Documents shall contain such terms and conditions as the parties may mutually agree, including standard representations, warranties and covenants. All pricing in the Closing Documents shall be based upon a valuation performed by an independent third-party valuation firm mutually selected by the parties, and the valuation firm shall determine the outcome of any pricing disputes not resolved by the 65th day following the date of the Term Sheet, which the Company and Blue California later agreed to extend beyond the originally agreed65th day following the date of the Term Sheet. In addition, the Company agrees to include in the Closing Documents a grant to its affiliate manufacturer in Asia of a non-exclusive, non-transferable and non-sublicensable sub-license to use all the existing know-how, patent registrations, patent applications and other proprietary technologies for the purpose of manufacturing of the Stevia Products in the territory of such manufacturer’s domicile of entity organization only for sale to the Company or the Company’s designated customers.

On August 16, 2017, the Company and another company owned by the Majority Shareholder (“Conagen”) entered into a First Amendment (the “Amendment”) to Inter-Company Patent License Agreement between the Company and Conagen dated November 28, 2016 (the “License Agreement”) Pursuant to the terms of the License Agreement, Conagen granted to the Company an exclusive, perpetual and sub-licensable license to development, production, distribution and commercialization of compounds, substances, products and services related to the stevia plant for use in the field of food and beverage flavoring, and the Company must pay a minimum royalty to Conagen of $2 million per year beginning in the year in which there is a first commercial sale (“FCS”) of the Products, as follows: (i) 10% of the Company’s Product net sales for the year of FCS (pro-rated, if necessary); (ii) 9% of Product net sales for the first year after FCS; (iii) 8% of Product net sales for the second year after FCS; (iv) 7% of Product net sales for the third year after FCS; (v) 6% of Product net sales for the fourth year after FCS; and (vi) 5% of Product net sales for all following years after FCS. The Amendment expands the field of use from flavoring for foods and beverages to use as flavors or sweeteners in food and beverages. The Amendment also altered the royalty structure, eliminating the annual $2,000,000 minimum royalty requirement and adding an annual $15,000,000 maximum royalty limitation. The royalty calculation also changed from a tiered system of royalty percentages that decline annually to a flat 5% royalty on net sales. Royalty payments were also revised from semi-annual payments due within 60 days of the end of each royalty period to annual payments based upon the Company’s fiscal year due within 90 days of the end of each royalty period.

The Company does not own any real property. As discussed in Part II – Other Information, Item 5(a), Blue California charged the Company a flat fee allocation in the amount of $250,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 to pay for shared resources which are currently borne by Blue California.  These shared resources include general and administrative support personnel and facility expenses such as rent, utilities, and maintenance.

Blue California periodically loans the Company funds for short-term working capital needs. The Company also purchases inventory for resale from Blue California, and the Company records a liability to its Balance Sheet for royalty payments due to Conagen (see Note 1, the Amendment). On September 30, 2017 and June 30, 2017, the Company owed $416,952 and $186,514, respectively, to companies owned by the Majority Shareholder.

During the three months ended September 30, 2017, Blue California loaned the Company $57,596 to pay for professional fees and other general and administrative expenses. The Company repaid $173,918 during the three months ended September 30, 2017, and including the beginning balance of $186,514, the Company owed $70,192 at the end of the current period for these expenses.

12

During the three months ended September 30, 2017, the Company purchased $1,365,124 of inventory from both Blue California and an affiliate of the Majority Shareholder (the “Manufacturing Company”). This inventory was mostly immediately shipped to customers. The Company repaid $1,274,420 for inventory receipts, and including the beginning balance of $0, the Company owed $90,704 at the end of the current period for inventory.

During the three months ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded a liability of $6,056 in recognition of royalty payments due to Conagen based on Product shipments (see Note 1, the Amendment). The royalty fee structure has been agreed to by both parties and accruals have been recorded pursuant to the terms of the Amendment. Payment is due to Conagen within 90 days after the end of the Company’s fiscal year ending on June 30, 2018.

Total amount owed to companies owned by the Majority Shareholder due to expenses ($250,000 allocation and $70,192 general), inventory ($90,704) and royalties ($6,056) at the end of September 30, 2017 is $416,952. All amounts loaned to the Company were non-interest bearing and due on demand.

The amounts and terms of the above transactions may not necessarily be indicative of the amounts and terms that would have been incurred had comparable transactions been entered into with independent third parties.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e)) under the Exchange Act) that is designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time specified in the Commission's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer's management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act, the Company carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the quarter ended September 30, 2017. Based upon that evaluation, the Company's Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of September 30, 2017 due to the Company’s limited size, limited internal resources, and lack of ability to have multiple levels of transaction review.

A material weakness in internal control over financial reporting is a control deficiency (within the meaning of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) Auditing Standard No. 2), or a combination of control deficiencies, that result in there being more than a remote likelihood of material misstatement in the annual or interim financial statements would not be prevented or detected.

The matters involving internal controls and procedures that our management considered to be material weaknesses were: (1) lack of a functioning audit committee, (2) lack of a majority of outside directors on our Board of Directors, resulting in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures; (3) inadequate segregation of duties consistent with control objectives; (4) management dominated by a single individual without adequate compensating controls; and (5) inadequate internal resources for accounting and reporting matters. The aforementioned material weaknesses were identified by our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer in connection with the review of our consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2017.

17

Management believes that the material weaknesses set forth above did not have an effect on our financial results. However, management believes that the lack of a functioning audit committee and the lack of a majority of outside directors on our Board of Directors results in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures, which could result in a material misstatement in our consolidated financial statements in future periods.

Management is in the process of determining how best to change our current system and implement a more effective system to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports that must be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission has been recorded, processed, summarized and reported accurately. Our management acknowledges the existence of this problem and intends to develop procedures to address this problem to the extent possible given limitations in financial and manpower resources. While management is working on a plan, no assurance can be made at this point that the implementation of such controls and procedures will be completed in a timely manner or that they will be adequate once implemented.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

In August, 2017, the Company hired a Controller as part of its efforts to address internal accounting personnel deficiencies.

18