SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-KSB

x    

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006

OR

¨     

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                to                

Commission File Number 000-501191


 UREX ENERGY CORP.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)


Nevada


98-0201259

(State or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)

(IRS Employer
Identification Number)

10580 N. McCarran Blvd., Building 115-208

Reno, Nevada


 89503

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(Zip Code)


(775) 747-0667

(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class

Name of each Exchange on which registered

None

None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:  

Title of Each Class

Name of each Exchange on which registered

Common Shares

OTC Bulletin Board

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports); and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for the past 90 days:    Yes     x     No     ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-B is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB:    / /

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).       Yes    ¨      No   x    

State issuer’s revenues for its most recent fiscal year.   Nil

Aggregate market value of outstanding Common Stock held by non-affiliates:  As of July 10, 2006, the aggregate market value of outstanding Common Stock of the registrant held by non-affiliates was approximately $44,782,800.

Outstanding Common Stock: As of March 31, 2006, the Company had 39,212,800 shares of Common Stock outstanding.  As of July 10, 2006, the Company had 94,425,600 shares of Common Stock outstanding after taking into account the forward stock split on a basis of two new shares for each one old share, which was effective July 3, 2006.  

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one): Yes ¨ No x



ii






TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

Page

USE OF NAMES

 

1

CURRENCY

 

1

METRIC CONVERSION TABLE

 

1

UNCERTAINTY OF FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

1

PART I

   

ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND RISK FACTORS

 

1

ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY

 

8

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

13

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

 

13

PART II

   

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED

 STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

 

13

ITEM 6. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATIONS

 

14

ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

19

ITEM 8. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

 

20

ITEM 8A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

20

ITEM 8B. OTHER INFORMATION

 

20

PART III

   

ITEM 9. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

 

21

ITEM 10. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

23

ITEM 11. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

 

24

ITEM 12. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

 

25

ITEM 13. EXHIBITS

 

26

PART IV

   

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

 

27




2






USE OF NAMES

In this report, the terms “Urex” and “Company”, unless the context otherwise requires, mean Urex Energy Corp. and its subsidiaries.

CURRENCY

Unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts in this report are expressed in United States dollars.

METRIC CONVERSION TABLE

To Convert Imperial Measurement Units

 

To Metric Measurement Units

 

Multiply by

Acres

 

Hectares

 

0.4047

Feet

 

Meters

 

0.3048

Miles

 

Kilometers

 

1.6093

Tons (short)

 

Tonnes

 

0.9071

Gallons

 

Liters

 

3.7850

Ounces (troy)

 

Grams

 

31.103

Ounces (troy) per ton (short)

 

Grams per tonne

 

34.286

UNCERTAINTY OF FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This document, including any documents that are incorporated by reference, contains forward-looking statements concerning, among other things, mineralized material, proven or probable reserves and cash operating costs. Such statements are typically punctuated by words or phrases such as “anticipates”, “estimates”, “projects”, “foresees”, “management believes”, “believes” and words or phrases of similar import. Such statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties or assumptions. If one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or if underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or projected. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in such forward-looking statements are identified in this document under “Part I—Item 1. Description of the Business and Risk Factors”. The Company assumes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions, or changes in other factors affecting such statements.

PART I

ITEM 1.  DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND RISK FACTORS

General Overview

Urex Energy Corp. (the “ Company ” or “ Lakefield ” or “ Urex ”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on February 6, 2002 under the name Lakefield Ventures Inc.  Subsequently, on June 8, 2006, Lakefield established a wholly owned subsidiary, Urex Energy Corp., a company incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada.  Also on June 8, 2006, Urex and Lakefield entered into an agreement and plan of merger (the “ Merger Agreement ”), whereby Urex and Lakefield agreed for Urex to be merged with and into Lakefield, with Lakefield remaining as the surviving company under the name “Urex Energy Corp.” (the “ Merger ”).  The Merger became effective as of July 3, 2006. The Merger Agreement was completed in accordance with the laws of the State of Nevada.


Since inception, Urex has not been in bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceedings.  Other than as disclosed above, the Company has one majority-owned subsidiary, United Energy Metals S.A., an Argentina company, of which the Company owns 99.8% of the issued and outstanding capital stock, and the Company has not had any material reclassification, merger, consolidation, purchase or sale of a significant amount of assets not in the ordinary course of its business.  The Company’s year end is March 31.

The Company’s Articles of Incorporation currently provide that the Company is authorized to issue 310,000,000 shares of which 300,000,000 are shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share (“ shares ”) and 10,000,000 preferred stock, par value $0.001.  As at July 10, 2006, there were 94,425,600 shares outstanding and nil preferred stock outstanding, after giving effect to the forward stock split of two shares for each one old share.  The Company’s shares began trading on the OTC Bulletin Board (the “ OTCBB ”) under the name “Lakefield Ventures, Inc.” and under the symbol “LKVN”.  On June 2, 2005, the Company’s authorized common stock was increased from 50,000,000 shares, par value $0.001 per share, to 150,000,000 shares, par value $0.001 per share, and the issued and outstanding common stock was forward split on a basis of 11.14 new shares for each one (1) old share.  On June 3, 2005, the Company’s shares traded under the symbol “LKFV”.  Effective July 3, 2006, the Company trades on the OTCBB under the symbol “URXE”.

The Company’s principle offices are located at 10580 N. McCarran Blvd., Building 115-208, Reno, Nevada  89503; the Company’s telephone number is (775) 747-0667 and its facsimile number is (702) 938-8619.

The Company is also registered as a foreign company in Argentina, and its fixed legal address in Argentina is 1052 San Martin Avenue, 3 rd Floor, Office 17, Cuidad Mendoza, Province of Mendoza, Argentina.

Since its inception, the Company has been primarily engaged in the acquisition and exploration of uranium mining properties, and has not yet realized any revenues from its planned operations.  The Company’s current property portfolio consists of two uranium prospects, located in the United States and Argentina.  

The Company does not have defined mineral resources or reserves on any of its exploration properties.    Discovering new mineral deposits is dependent on a number of factors including the experience of exploration personnel involved,   the location of the property, and most important - stable funding of exploration programs.  The commercial viability of a mineral deposit once discovered is also dependent on a number of factors including country of location, size, grade, and proximity to infrastructure, as well as metal prices. The prices of most metals, including uranium, have increased significantly over the past year, improving the probability of successful that a new discovery will be economic, as well as the improving the access to capital to finance on-going activities.


Material Agreements


On September 22, 2005, the Company entered into an assignment agreement (the “ Assignment Agreement ”) with International Mineral Resources Ltd. (“ IMR ”), a company organized under the laws of the Turks & Caicos Islands, whereby IMR agreed to assign its right, title and interest in and to an option agreement (the “ Option Agreement ”) entered into between IMR and United Energy Metals S.A (“ UEM ”) to the Company.  The Option Agreement allows for the holder of the option (the “ Option ”) to acquire 99.8% of the equity in UEM, an Argentina company, which in turn holds a 100% interest in a commanding property position of 170,000 hectares adjacent to the Cerro Solo Uranium deposit (such property is known as the “ Rio Chubut Property ”).  On December 7, 2005, IMR exercised the Option to acquire 99.8% of the equity in UEM.  As consideration for the assignment of the Option from IMR to the Company, the Company was required to issue 8,000,000 shares of the Company to IMR and pay $50,000.00 to IMR, with IMR retaining a 5% net smelter royalty in respect of the Rio Chubut Property.  As of June 8, 2006, the Company and IMR have completed the Assignment Agreement, and therefore, the Company acquired 99.8% of the equity in UEM.


On April 15, 2002, the Company entered into a mineral property option agreement (the “ Mineral Property Option Agreement ”) with Peter Hawley, of Val D’Or, Quebec, Canada, whereby the Company could acquire a 90% interest in 6 mineral claims (the “Kayla Property”).  The Kayla Property is located in Val D’Or Mining District, in the Levy Township of Quebec, Canada, and is comprised of 95.70 hectares.  Under the terms of the Mineral Property Option Agreement, the Company was required to incur exploration expenditures totaling $150,000 of which $15,000 (phase 1) was required to be expended by December 31, 2004 and $135,000 (phase 2) was required to be expended by December 31, 2005.  During December 2004, $15,000 was expensed in accordance with the requirements of phase 1.  Subsequent to the completion of phase 1, the Company has opted not to continue with phase 2 of the exploration program on the Kayla Property.

Employees

As of July 10, 2006, the Company had 0 full-time employees (over and above its directors, officers and consultants.

Other Property Interests and Mining Claims

While the Company is actively seeking new prospects, it currently only has interests in the properties discussed below in “Item 2 – Description of Properties.”

Government Regulation

Mining operations and exploration activities are subject to various national, state, provincial and local laws and regulations in Canada, United States and Argentina, as well as other jurisdictions, which govern prospecting, development, mining, production, exports, taxes, labor standards, occupational health, waste disposal, protection of the environment, mine safety, hazardous substances and other matters.

The Company has obtained applications for those licenses, permits and other authorizations currently required to conduct its explorations in Argentina.  In Argentina, business licenses for companies, and the acquisition and transfer of exploration and mining permits are all acquired subject to government approval.  Such approval may involve many levels of government (i.e. Federal, Provincial, County and/or City approval), and the Company cannot guarantee that all such approvals will be successfully obtained even where its Option has been successfully exercised.  Moreover, even where business licenses are issued, there can be no guarantee that the transfer and/or acquisition of exploration and/or mining permits will be approved, nor can the Company guarantee that such approvals will be obtained from all levels of government required for such approval.  

The Company believes that it is and will continue to be in compliance in all material respects with applicable statutes and the regulations passed in Argentina.  There are no current orders or directions relating to the Company with respect to the foregoing laws and regulations.

Environmental Regulation

The Company's exploration projects are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations governing protection of the environment, in Canada, the United States and in Argentina. These laws are continually changing and, as a general matter, are becoming more restrictive. The Company's policy is to conduct business in a way that safeguards public health and the environment. The Company believes that its operations are conducted in material compliance with applicable laws and regulations.

Changes to current local, state or federal laws and regulations in the jurisdictions where the Company operates or may operate in the future could require additional capital expenditures and increased operating costs. Although the Company is unable to predict what additional legislation, if any, might be proposed or enacted, additional regulatory requirements could impact the economics of its projects.

In the preceding year, there were no material environmental incidents or non-compliance with any applicable environmental regulations. The Company estimates that it will not incur material capital expenditures for environmental control facilities during the current fiscal year.

Competition

The Company competes with other mining companies in connection with the acquisition of prospective properties. There is competition for the limited number of opportunities, some of which is with other companies having substantially greater financial resources than the Company. As a result, the Company may have difficulty acquiring attractive projects at reasonable prices.

The Company believes no single company has sufficient market power to affect the price or supply of minerals in the world market.

Risk Factors

The following risk factors should be considered in connection with an evaluation of the business of the Company:

THE COMPANY'S LIMITED OPERATING HISTORY MAKES IT DIFFICULT FOR YOU TO JUDGE ITS PROSPECTS.

The Company has a limited operating history upon which an evaluation of the Company, its current business and its prospects can be based. You should consider any purchase of the Company's shares in light of the risks, expenses and problems frequently encountered by all companies in the early stages of its corporate development.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES ARE UNCERTAIN.

For the year ended March 31, 2006, the Company had an operating loss of $155,183.  At March 31, 2006, the Company had working capital deficiency of ($227,507).  The Company may need to raise additional capital by way of an offering of equity securities, an offering of debt securities, or by obtaining financing through a bank or other entity.  The Company has not established a limit as to the amount of debt it may incur nor has it adopted a ratio of its equity to debt allowance.  If the Company needs to obtain additional financing, there is no assurance that financing will be available from any source, that it will be available on terms acceptable to us, or that any future offering of securities will be successful.  If additional funds are raised through the issuance of equity securities, there may be a significant dilution in the value of the Company’s outstanding common stock.  The Company could suffer adverse consequences if it is unable to obtain additional capital which would cast substantial doubt on its ability to continue its operations and growth.

THE VALUE AND TRANSFERABILITY OF THE COMPANY'S SHARES MAY BE ADVERSELY IMPACTED BY THE LIMITED TRADING MARKET FOR ITS SHARES AND THE PENNY STOCK RULES.

There is only a limited trading market for the Company's shares. The Company's common stock is traded on the over-the-counter market and "bid" and "asked" quotations regularly appear on the OTCBB under the symbol "URXE". There can be no assurance that the Company's common stock will trade at prices at or above its present level, and an inactive or illiquid trading market may have an adverse impact on the market price. In addition, holders of the Company's common stock may experience substantial difficulty in selling their securities as a result of the "penny stock rules," which restrict the ability of brokers to sell certain securities of companies whose assets or revenues fall below the thresholds established by those rules.

FUTURE SALES OF SHARES MAY ADVERSELY IMPACT THE VALUE OF THE COMPANY'S STOCK.

If required, the Company may seek to raise additional capital through the sale of common stock. Future sales of shares by the Company or its stockholders could cause the market price of its common stock to decline.

MINERAL EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES ARE SPECULATIVE IN NATURE.

Resource exploration and development is a speculative business, characterized by a number of significant risks including, among other things, unprofitable efforts resulting not only from the failure to discover mineral deposits but from finding mineral deposits which, though present, are insufficient in quantity and quality to return a profit from production. The marketability of minerals acquired or discovered by the Company may be affected by numerous factors which are beyond the control of the Company and which cannot be accurately predicted, such as market fluctuations, the proximity and capacity of milling facilities, mineral markets and processing equipment and such other factors as government regulations, including regulations relating to royalties, allowable production, importing and exporting of minerals and environmental protection, the combination of which factors may result in the Company not receiving an adequate return of investment capital.

The mining and exploration business relies upon the accuracy of determinations as to whether a given deposit has significant mineral reserves and resources. This reliance is important in that reported mineral reserves and resources are only estimates and do not represent with certainty that estimated mineral reserves and resources will be recovered or that they will be recovered at the rates estimated. Mineral reserve and resource estimates are based on limited sampling, and inherently carry the uncertainty that samples may not be representative. Mineral reserve and resource estimates may require revision (either upward or downward) based on actual production experience. Market fluctuations in the price of metals, as well as increased production costs or reduced recovery rates, may render certain mineral resources uneconomic. Inaccurate estimates may result in a misallocation of resources such that an excess amount could be allocated to a less than economic deposit or, conversely, failure to develop a significant deposit.


THE COMPANY WILL BE SUBJECT TO OPERATING HAZARDS AND RISKS WHICH MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT THE COMPANY'S FINANCIAL CONDITION.

Mineral exploration involves many risks, which even a combination of experience, knowledge and careful evaluation may not be able to overcome. The Company's operations will be subject to all the hazards and risks normally incidental to exploration, development and production of metals, such as unusual or unexpected formations, cave-ins or pollution, all of which could result in work stoppages, damage to property and possible environmental damage. The Company does not have general liability insurance covering its operations and does not presently intend to obtain liability insurance as to such hazards and liabilities. Payment of any liabilities as a result could have a materially adverse effect upon the Company's financial condition

THE COMPANY'S ACTIVITIES WILL BE SUBJECT TO ENVIRONMENTAL AND OTHER INDUSTRY REGULATIONS WHICH COULD HAVE AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE FINANCIAL CONDITION OF THE COMPANY.

The Company's activities are subject to environmental regulations promulgated by government agencies from time to time. Environmental legislation generally provides for restrictions and prohibitions on spills, releases or emissions of various substances produced in association with certain mining industry operations, such as seepage from tailing disposal areas, which would result in environmental pollution. A breach of such legislation may result in imposition of fines and penalties. In addition, certain types of operations require the submission and approval of environmental impact assessments. Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner which means stricter standards and enforcement, fines and penalties for non-compliance are more stringent. Environmental assessments of proposed projects carry a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and directors, officers and employees. The cost of compliance with changes in governmental regulations could have an adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company.

The operations of the Company including exploration and development activities and commencement of production on its properties, require permits from various federal, state, provincial and local governmental authorities and such operations are and will be governed by laws and regulations governing prospecting, development, mining, production, exports, taxes, labor standards, occupational health, waste disposal, toxic substances, land use, environmental protection, mine safety and other matters. Companies engaged in the development and operation of mines and related facilities generally experience increased costs and delays in production and other schedules as a result of the need to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permits.

Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations, and permitting requirements may result in enforcement actions thereunder, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities causing operations to cease or be curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment, or remedial actions. Parties engaged in mining operations may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of the mining activities and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of applicable laws or regulations and, in particular, environmental laws.

THE COMPANY IS SUBJECT TO A VARIETY OF JURISDICTIONAL RISKS

Several of the known but undeveloped deposits lie in jurisdictions with embryonic mineral or company laws. The region may also rank poorly on corruption indices, or even be subject to civil unrest. These risks would be burdens over and above the potential infrastructure development costs mentioned earlier, and certainly need to be accounted for in the true cost of uranium production. While often difficult to quantify, blanket burdens represented as a percentage of overall cost may provide a proxy, and in some cases can be based on previous experiences in the region.

COMPETITION MAY HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE COMPANY'S ABILITY TO ACQUIRE ATTRACTIVE MINERAL PROPERTIES, WHICH MAY HAVE AN ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE COMPANY'S OPERATIONS.

Significant and increasing competition exists for the limited number of mineral acquisition opportunities available. As a result of this competition, some of which is with large established mining companies with substantial capabilities and greater financial and technical resources than the Company, the Company may be unable to acquire attractive mineral properties on terms it considers acceptable. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that any exploration program intended by the Company on properties it intends to acquire will yield any reserves or result in any commercial mining operation.

DOWNWARD FLUCTUATIONS IN METAL PRICES MAY SEVERELY REDUCE THE VALUE OF THE COMPANY.

The Company has no control over the fluctuations in the prices of the metals that it is exploring for. A significant decline in such prices would severely reduce the value of the Company.

THE COMPANY CURRENTLY RELIES ON CERTAIN KEY INDIVIDUALS AND THE LOSS OF ONE OF THESE CERTAIN KEY INDIVIDUALS COULD HAVE AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE COMPANY.

The Company's success depends to a certain degree upon certain key members of the management. These individuals are a significant factor in the Company's growth and success. The loss of the service of members of the management and certain key employees could have a material adverse effect on the Company. In particular, the success of the Company is highly dependant upon the efforts of the President and director of the Company, Mr. Richard Bachman, the loss of whose services would have a material adverse effect on the success and development of the Company.  

THE COMPANY DOES NOT MAINTAIN KEY MAN INSURANCE TO COMPENSATE THE COMPANY FOR THE LOSS OF CERTAIN KEY INDIVIDUALS.

The Company does not anticipate having key man insurance in place in respect of any of its senior officers or personnel.


WE ARE AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY, AND THERE IS NO ASSURANCE THAT A COMMERCIALLY VIABLE DEPOSIT OR "RESERVE" EXISTS ON ANY PROPERTIES FOR WHICH THE COMPANY HAS, OR MIGHT OBTAIN, AN INTEREST.


The Company is an exploration stage company and cannot give assurance that a commercially viable deposit, or “reserve,” exists on any properties for which the Company currently has (through a joint venture agreement) or may have (through potential future joint venture agreements or acquisitions) an interest. Therefore, determination of the existence of a reserve depends on appropriate and sufficient exploration work and the evaluation of legal, economic, and environmental factors. If the Company fails to find a commercially viable deposit on any of its properties, its financial condition and results of operations will be materially adversely affected.


WE REQUIRE SUBSTANTIAL FUNDS MERELY TO DETERMINE WHETHER COMMERCIAL MINERAL DEPOSITS EXIST ON OUR PROPERTIES.


Any potential development and production of the Company’s exploration properties depends upon the results of exploration programs and/or feasibility studies and the recommendations of duly qualified engineers and geologists. Such programs require substantial additional funds. Any decision to further expand the Company’s operations on these exploration properties is anticipated to involve consideration and evaluation of several significant factors including, but not limited to:


·

Costs of bringing each property into production, including exploration work, preparation of production feasibility studies, and construction of production facilities;

·

Availability and costs of financing;

·

Ongoing costs of production;

·

Market prices for the minerals to be produced;

·

Environmental compliance regulations and restraints; and

·

Political climate and/or governmental regulation and control.




3






GENERAL MINING RISKS  


Factors beyond the control of the Company may affect the marketability of any substances discovered from any resource properties the Company may acquire.    Government regulations relating to price, royalties, allowable production and importing and exporting of minerals can adversely affect the Company.  There can be no certainty that the Company will be able to obtain all necessary licenses and permits that may be required to carry out exploration, development and operations on any projects it may acquire and environmental concerns about mining in general continue to be a significant challenge for all mining companies.

ITEM 2.    DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTIES.

1.

La Jara Mesa Extension Property


In December 2005, the Company acquired a 100% interest in the La Jara Mesa Extension uranium property consisting of 137 unpatented mining claims (approximately 2,740 acres) in Grants Mining District, Cibola County, New Mexico. The La Jara Mesa Extension property lies adjacent to Laramide Resources Ltd.—La Jara Mesa and Melrich uranium deposits. Between 1950 and 1978, the Grants Mining District produced 135,891 tons of U3O8, which ranks it as one of the most prolific uranium districts in the United States.  The Company acquired the La Jara Mesa Extension mining claims through staking.


Property Description


The La Jara Mesa deposit lies on the southwest boundary of the Company’s claim block and contains five separate areas which have a combined mineral inventory (drill indicated and inferred) of 1,133,310 tons at 0.30% eU3O8 containing 7,133,310 pounds of U3O8 utilizing a 15% diluted thickness/grade cutoff of 6 feet at 0.16% eU3O8 as defined by Homestake Mining Company in 1982. Investors are cautioned that mineral deposits on adjacent properties are not necessarily indicative of mineral deposits on the Company’s properties.


The Melrich ore body, lies on the northeast boundary of the Company’s claim block and is a north-south trending tabular unit containing an Indicated/Inferred/Potential resource of 1,045,500 tons at an undiluted grade of 0.154% eU3O8 for a total of 3,217,000 pounds of U3O8 when using a 0.08% eU3O8 cutoff per Homestake Mining Company. The ore body is approximately 2,600 feet in length, 500 feet in width, and has an average thickness of 11.8 feet.


Location


The La Jara Mesa deposit is located 18 kilometers northeast of Grants within the San Mateo Mountains in the Southern part of New Mexico, and has a near arid environment (10 inches annual rainfall). The mesa where the deposit occurs is 2440 meters to 2530 meters above sea level.


Local Geology


The uranium mineralization in the area occurs as tabular units within the Brushy Basin member of the Jurassic Morrison formation. The host sandstone is equivalent to the production zone at the Jackpile Mine operated by Anaconda to the east of the project area. The formation is near horizontal and is dry. The Jurassic Morrison formation's Brushy Basin host rock extends under the Company’s claim block with drilled uranium reserves on the boundaries.


La Jara Mesa is sandstone hosted roll front type deposit that has been extensively explored by Homestake and others including Pathfinder and Power Resources. Since the early 1980's approximately 500 rotary holes and 18 diamond drill holes were drilled on the property; preliminary metallurgical test work and initial mine planning has also been completed. The Company intends to immediately commission an independent engineering report in compliance with the Canadian securities laws National Instrument 43-101 format. This report will validate and update the existing resource as well as provide recommendations for further exploration and development work.


New Mexico Uranium Districts

New Mexico ranks 2nd in uranium reserves in the U. S., which amounts to 15 million tons ore at 0.277% U3O8 (84 million lbs U3O8) at $30/lb (Energy Information Administration, 2000). The most important uranium deposit in the state is sandstone within the Morrison Formation (Jurassic) in the Grants and Shiprock uranium districts, San Juan Basin. More than 340 million lbs of U3O8 have been produced from these uranium deposits from 1948 through 2000, accounting for 97% of the total uranium production in New Mexico and more than 30% of the total uranium production in the United States. Figure 1 illustrates the key towns and uranium mining in the surrounding area.


Figure 1: New Mexico—Uranium Districts

[F10KSB002.GIF]

Figure courtesy of Brugge & Goble, 2002, The History of Uranium Mining and the Navajo People


Only one company in New Mexico, Quivira Mining Co. owned by Rio Algom Ltd. (successor to Kerr McGee Corporation), produced uranium in 1984-2000 from waters recovered from inactive underground operations at Ambrosia Lake, Grants (mine-water recovery)3.


The Grants Uranium Belt, started production in the late 1940s. The boom years in the Belt were 1953-1980, when approximately 350 million pounds of yellow cake were produced. Uranium recovery operations declined dramatically after 1980, when the liquidation of large government Cold War military stockpiles depressed the uranium market. New Mexico ranks second behind Wyoming in uranium reserves. All uranium recovery in the state ceased in December 2002 and operations in the state now are focused on reclamation.


As the price of uranium rises, then the quantity of an economic resource increases. At $30/pound, the U.S. Energy Information Administrated reported the state of New Mexico held 84 million pounds of uranium oxide, grading 0.28/ton, as of Dec 31, 2004. However, at $50/pound uranium, that quantity would jump to 341 million pounds. The spread on the gross value of the uranium assets between those price levels is nearly $15 billion! As the spot price escalates, the economic reserves grow.


2.

Rio Chubut Property


The Company’s Rio Chubut Property is comprised of 170,000 hectares, located adjacent to the Cerro Solo Uranium deposit.  This Uranium deposit is located in the Chubut Province of Patagonia, Southern Argentina. The exploration block is approximately 160 km x 195 km, and borders the Cerro Solo uranium deposit to both the North and South.


Property Acquisition


On September 22, 2005, the Company entered into the Assignment Agreement with International Mineral Resources Ltd. (“ IMR ”), a company organized under the laws of the Turks & Caicos Islands, whereby IMR agreed to assign its right, title and interest in and to the Option Agreement entered into between IMR and United Energy Metals S.A (“ UEM ”) to the Company.  The Option Agreement allows for the holder of the option (the “ Option ”) to acquire 99.8% of the equity in UEM, an Argentina company, which in turn holds a 100% interest in a commanding property position of 170,000 hectares adjacent to the Cerro Solo Uranium deposit (such property is known as the “ Rio Chubut Property ”).  On December 7, 2005, IMR exercised the Option to acquire 99.8% of the equity in UEM.  As consideration for the assignment of the Option from IMR to the Company, the Company was required to issue 8,000,000 shares of the Company to IMR and pay $50,000.00 to IMR, with IMR retaining a 5% net smelter royalty in respect of the Rio Chubut Property.  As of June 8, 2006, the Company and IMR have completed the Assignment Agreement, and therefore, the Company acquired 99.8% of the equity in UEM.


Independent Review


The Company commissioned a review of the Rio Chubut Uranium Project, to evaluate the properties’ mineral potential for uranium, and prepare an independent appraisal report. The study, which was prepared by Brian Cole, P.Geo and dated September 23, 2005, is a combined historical document and data review as well as a report on direct observations made during a two-day field visit in June 2005.  A copy of such report is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.2.


Property Description and Location


The Rio Chubut Property in Chubut Province, Argentina is centered at:


Property Group

Latitude

Centeroid

Longitude

Centeroid

Aggregate Area

(hectares)

Rio Chubut Project

43˚ 45’ S

68˚ 00’ W

170,000


The Rio Chubut Property exploration permit (“ cateo ”) particulars are listed in Table 1 below:




4






Table 1:

 

Chubut Uranium Project

List of Cateos

Cerro Solo Group

Eastern Cateos

UE No

Cateo No

Recording

Area

UE No

Cateo No

Recording

Area

   

Date

(ha)

   

Date

(ha)

1

14.548

April 12, 2005

7,889

29

14.601

May 5, 2005

9,981

2

14.549

April 12, 2005

9,982

30

14.602

May 5, 2005

9,979

3

14.550

April 12, 2005

7,893

33

14.603

May 5, 2005

9,979

4

14.551

April 12, 2005

9,614

37

14.604

May 5, 2005

9,976

27

14.552

April 12, 2005

7,086

34

14.605

May 5, 2005

9,979

28

14.553

April 12, 2005

9,961

       

5

14.594

May 5, 2005

9,123

       

7

14.595

May 5, 2005

10,106

       

10

14.596

May 5, 2005

9,982

       

13

14.597

May 5, 2005

9,931

       

14

14.598

May 5, 2005

8,732

       

16

14.599

May 5, 2005

9,982

       

18

14.600

May 5, 2005

9,981

       

Total Area

120,263

 

49,893


The project locale encompasses a rectangular area approximately 160 km by 195 km.  On the west side lays a contiguous block of 13 exploration permits (“ cateos ”) covering an aggregate area of approximately 120,000ha.  The long axis of the grouping trends north-northeast (“NNE”) and is 74 km long by and average 20km wide.  The centra embayment plunging into the group from the east that almost bisects the property block is occupied by the Cerro Solo deposit property controlled by Comision Nacional de Energia Atomica (“ CNEA ”).  The old Los Adobes Mine is located 4 km NNE of the Cerro Solo deposit.  A 72 ha rectangular reservation surrounds the mine.  Cateo No. 14.550 (United Energy No. 3) envelops this reservation, which is also bisected by the main road.  Five additional widely separated cateos lie on the east side of the project area.  These are nearly 10,000ha in size each.


According to the Argentine Mining Act, the level of cateo filing fees and extent of tenure are contingent upon permit size.  Cateos have multi-year tenures before attracting additional governmental maintenance costs.  For instance, a 10,000ha cateo attracts no further maintenance fees for 1,100 days (3 years).  At that point in time, the property size must be reduced by at least one half and a mining license applied for.  Further exploration, feasibility work, and eventually exploitation, pending regulatory approval, can be carried out under a mining license.


The cateos are “paper staked” with no signifying demarcation monuments being erected.  Hence, cateo boundaries have not been surveyed.


Access, Infrastructure, Physiography and Climate


The centre of the project area lays 270km west of the provincial capital of Rawson (population 30,000), a small port city at the mouth of the Rio Chubut.  The regional airport serving Rawson is located in the nearby town of Trelew.  National Road 25 (“ NR 25 ”), a paved road in sound condition, extends west from Rawson and bisects the project area.  A network of aggregate and dirt roads in good condition branch off NR 25 and either cut or touch upon any particular cateo, facilitating reasonable access in most cases.  The towns of Paso de Los Indios (population around 1,000) and Las Plumas (population around 500), located along NR 25 bracket the project area to the west and east, respectively.  A small hotel and restaurant exists in Paso de Los Indios.


Relief in the project area is low with elevation ranging between 200m and 650m above sea level.  Vegetation consists of low shrubs and related brush and grasses.  Climate is semi-arid and average annual temperature varies from 6˚C to 14˚C whereas minimum and maximum temperatures may range from -20˚C to 40˚C.  Although heavy snowfalls can occur, roads stay open most of the year.


The large contiguous Cerro Solo cateo grouping is cut by the Rio Chubut at its southern end.  Although the Rio Chubut is wide (>50m) in the project area, it is generally shallow.  The Rio Chubut flows east and eventually spills into the Atlantic Ocean at Rawson.


A seasonal dirt airstrip of approximately 800m in length is located 1.7km north of the Cerro Solo deposit and remains clear of vegetation.  Minimal work would be required to reactivate the strip.


Local Geology


Volcanic tuffs of the Cretaceous Cerro Barcino formation underlie most of the project area.  These tuffs tend to thinly cover much of the underlying fluvial derived rocks deposited in broad braided channel environments.  On average, individual braided streams have a propensity to form sandstone bodies.


To date the better uranium deposits have been discovered in sedimentary rocks deposited by braided, high-energy fluvial processes.  This includes the Los Adobes Formation in the Cerro Solo area, and the Arroyo del Pajarito member in particular.  This member is up to 150m thick within the Cerro Solo deposit.  Mineralization can also occur in volcanic tuffs of the Cerro Barcino formation and in surface soils with a caliche association.  Caliche is desert soil formed by the near surface crystallization of calcite and/or other soluble minerals by upward-moving solutions.


Faulting at Cerro Solo predominantly strikes northwest and dips eastwards.  Most displacement is lateral with a lesser vertical component.  However, interaction with the northeast trending conjugate member of the fault set produces a shearing effect.



Office Space

The Company currently has two administrative offices with one in Argentina and one in Reno, Nevada.  These office spaces are described in the table below:



5






Address

Approximate Size

Lease Term

Approximate monthly cost

San Martin 1052

3th Piso Of. 17

Ciudad Mendoza, Mendoza

Argentina

750 sq. ft.

No Lease

US$1000

10580 N. McCarran Blvd.

Building 115-208

Reno, NV  89503

500 sq. ft.

No Lease

US$500

ITEM 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

Management is not aware of any legal proceedings contemplated by any governmental authority or any other party involving the Company or its properties.  None of the Company’s directors, officer or affiliates are (i) a party adverse to the Company in any legal proceedings, or (ii) has an adverse interest to the Company in any legal proceedings.  Management is not aware of any other legal proceedings pending or that have been threatened against the Company or its properties.

ITEM 4.    SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

No matters were submitted to a vote of shareholders of the Company during the final quarter of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006.

PART II

ITEM 5.    MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

Market Information

The Common Shares of the Company are listed and posted for trading on the OTCBB under the symbol “URXE”. The market for the Company’s common stock is limited, volatile and sporadic.  The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices relating to the Company’s common stock for the last two fiscal years it was listed and posted for trading on the OTCBB.  These quotations reflect inter-dealer prices without retail mark-up, mark-down, or commissions, and may not reflect actual transactions.  .

Quarter Ended

   
     

2004

High Trade (1)

Low Trade (1)

June 31, 2004

$0.55

$0.55

September 30, 2004

$0.55

$0.55

December 31, 2004

$0.55

$0.55

March 31, 2005

$0.55

$0.55

     

2005

   

June 31, 2005

$0.55

$0.55

September 30, 2005

$0.45

$0.45

December 31, 2005

$0.35

$0.35

March 31, 2006

$0.76

$0.60

     


(1)

These prices do not reflect the forward stock split of two new shares for each one old share, which was effective July 3, 2006.


Holders


As of June 30, 2006, the Company had at least 41 shareholders of record.

Dividends

The Company has never paid dividends. While any future dividends will be determined by the directors of the Company after consideration of the earnings, financial condition and other relevant factors, it is currently expected that available cash resources will be utilized in connection with the ongoing acquisition, exploration and development programs of the Company.

Section 15(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

The Company’s shares are covered by Section 15(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended that imposes additional sales practice requirements on broker/dealers who sell such securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors (generally institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouses). For transactions covered by this Section 15(g), the broker/dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchase and have received the purchaser's written agreement to the transaction prior to the sale. Consequently, Section 15(g) may affect the ability of broker/dealers to sell the Company’s securities and also may affect your ability to sell your shares in the secondary market.


Section 15(g) also imposes additional sales practice requirements on broker/dealers who sell penny securities. These rules require a one page summary of certain essential items. The items include the risk of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and secondary marketing; terms important to an understanding of the function of the penny stock market, such as "bid" and "offer" quotes, a dealers "spread" and broker/dealer compensation; the broker/dealer compensation, the broker/dealers duties to its customers, including the disclosures required by any other penny stock disclosure rules; the customers rights and remedies in causes of fraud in penny stock transactions; and, the NASD's toll free telephone number and the central number of the North American Administrators Association, for information on the disciplinary history of broker/dealers and their associated persons.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

On June 8, 2006, the Company issued 8,000,000 shares to IMR in connection with an Assignment Agreement entered into between the Company and IMR, dated September 22, 2005.  The Company believes that such issuance is exempt from registration under Regulation S promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as the securities were issued to IMR through an offshore transaction which was negotiated outside of the United States and consummated outside of the United States.



ITEM 6.  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated audited financial statements and the related notes for the period ended March 31, 2006 that appear elsewhere in this annual report.  The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect the Company’s plans, estimates and beliefs.  The Company’s actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward looking statements.  Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed below and elsewhere in this registration statement, particularly in the section entitled "Risk Factors" beginning on page 7 of this annual report.

The Company’s consolidated audited financial statements are stated in United States Dollars and are prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

Overview

Urex is a Nevada corporation incorporated on February 6, 2002.  Urex is currently in the development stage and is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of uranium properties in Argentina and the United States.  To this end, the Company, has acquired a 100% interest in the La Jara Mesa Extension uranium property consisting of 137 unpatented claims (approximately 2,740 acres) in the Grants Mining District, Cibola County, New Mexico, through staking.  In addition, the Company has recently completed an Assignment Agreement with International Mineral Resources Inc., whereby the Company now owns 99.8% of United Energy Metals S.A., which in turn holds a 100% interest in the Rio Chubut Property comprised of 170,000 hectares located in the Chubut Province of Patagonia, Southern Argentina.  

Outlook


The mining industry continues to recharge as secular commodities market have reached the highest values in decades, led by gold, copper, oil and uranium.  High prices for precious and base metals are fueling new exploration and projects around the world and generating opportunities for exceptional profit taking and broad based asset diversification.


The Company expects uranium prices to remain strong, due to depleting uranium inventories, reconsideration of nuclear energy by developed nations and the rising energy demand from developing nations.  Many developed countries (European Union in particular) are now actively reconsidering the nuclear option.  Reasons include the difficulty of meeting Kyoto Protocol targets without a nuclear option and the significantly increased costs associated with producing electricity using traditional fossil fuels.  The development of new simplified reactor designs and the improvement in efficiencies of currently operating reactors have also dramatically improved the economics of nuclear power, contributing to increased uranium demand.

PLAN OF OPERATIONS AND CASH REQUIREMENTS


Cash Requirements


For the next 6 months the Company plans to complete a Phase 1 initial exploration programs on the La Jara Mesa Extension and the Rio Chubut Property.  The Company anticipates that this program will cost $1.1 million as detailed in Tables 1 and 2 below.  


In addition, the Company anticipates spending over the next year $60,000 on professional fees, $60,000 on salaries and wages, $30,000 on travel costs, $50,000 on promotional expenses, $60,000 on other administrative expenses and an additional $630,000 in surface work and drilling.  Total expenditures over the next 12 months are therefore expected to be $2,000,000.

Therefore, the Company will require additional funds to implement its intended exploration activities on these properties.  These funds may be raised through equity financing, debt financing, or other sources, which may result in further dilution in the equity ownership of the Company’s shares.  There is still no assurance that the Company will be able to maintain operations at a level sufficient for an investor to obtain a return on his investment in the Company’s common stock.  Further, the Company does not currently generate operating cash flows and may continue to be unprofitable.


During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, the Company received cash from financing activities of $201,575.  These funds were obtained from three separate loans by Financia Dacorey S.A. (“ Financia ”) to the Company, whereby the Company issued a promissory note in Financia’s favor for each loan.  Each promissory note is due on demand by Financia and is subject to simple interest from the date of advance, and payable at maturity, at a rate of 5% per annum.  These proceeds have been and will be used for general working capital and exploration activities.  


Over the next 6 months the Company’s expected Phase 1 funding requirements to expand on the exploration and development of the Company’s properties are as follows:


Table : La Jara Mesa Extension: Proposed Exploration Expenditures ($USD)

Salaries & Wages

$40,000

Consulting and Technical Services

$50,000

Surface work

$265,000

Environmental

$10,000

Property Costs

$24,000

Administrative & General

$34,000

Machinery expense

$24,000

TOTAL

$447,000


Table : Rio Chubut: Proposed Exploration Expenditures ($USD)

Salaries & Wages

$40,000

Consulting and Technical Services

$170,000

Surface work

$360,000

Environmental

$10,000

Property Costs

$15,000

Administrative & General

$34,000

Machinery expense

$24,000

TOTAL

$663,000


As at March 31, 2006, the Company had $277,215 in current liabilities.  The Company’s financial statements report a net loss of $219,507 for the cumulative period from February 6, 2002 (date of inception) to March 31, 2006 compared to a net loss of $155,183 for the period from April 1, 2005 to March 31, 2006.  The Company’s losses increased in part as a result of an overall increase in all expense categories during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 as the Company was more actively involved in the process of acquiring exploration properties, as compared to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005.


Our total liabilities as of March 31, 2006 were $277,215, as compared to total liabilities of $22,916 as at March 31, 2005.  The increase was due to the increase in account payable (from $416 as at March 31, 2005 to $50,138 as at March 31, 2006) and increase in notes payable (from $22,500 as at March 31, 2005 to $227,077 as at March 31, 2006).  


During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 the Company spent $39,276 on exploration of the Company’s uranium properties as compared to $16,000 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005.

The Company has suffered recurring losses from operations.  The continuation of the Company is dependent upon the Company attaining and maintaining profitable operations and raising additional capital.  In this regard, the Company intends to raise additional capital through equity financing, debt financing, or other sources.


The continuation of the Company’s business is dependent upon obtaining further financing, a successful program of acquisition and exploration, and, finally, achieving a profitable level of operations.  The issuance of additional equity securities by the Company could result in a significant dilution in the equity interests of the Company’s current stockholders.  Obtaining commercial loans, assuming those loans would be available, will increase the Company’s liabilities and future cash commitments.


There are no assurances that the Company will be able to obtain further funds required for its continued operations.  As noted herein, the Company intends to pursue various financing alternatives to meet its immediate and long-term financial requirements.  There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available to the Company when needed or, if available, that it can be obtained on commercially reasonable terms.  If the Company is not able to obtain the additional financing on a timely basis, it will be unable to conduct its operations as planned, and it will not be able to meet its other obligations as they become due.  In such event, the Company will be forced to scale down or perhaps even cease its operations.




6






Exploration Programs


La Jara Mesa Extension


The Company intends to apply for a permit to complete an exploration program consisting of approximately 3200 metres (10,000 feet) of drilling planned (33 holes) for the second half of 2006.  The drill program is designed test for the extension of uranium mineralization defined at Laramide Resources’ La Jara Meza Deposit located on the south-western corner of the property.   A National Instrument 43-101 independent technical report is expected to be completed before the start of this testing.  Depending on the results from the initial round of drilling, a second phase drilling program would follow in early 2007.


Rio Chubut Property


The Company’s proposed budget is also expected to support a 15,000 foot drill program (50 drill holes), which is designed to test for new Uranium ore bodies in the central Chubut Province, Argentina adjacent to the Cerro Solo uranium deposit.


Purchase of Significant Equipment

The Company does not intend to purchase any significant equipment (excluding uranium exploration activities) over the twelve months ending March 31, 2007.

Employees

In addition to our directors and officers we also have no employees as of March 31, 2006.  The Company does not expect any material changes in the number of employees over the next 12 month period.  The Company does and will continue to outsource contract employment as needed.  However, if the Company is successful in its initial and any subsequent drilling programs it may retain additional employees.  

Going Concern

The Company has suffered recurring losses from operations.  The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon it attaining and maintaining profitable operations and raising additional capital.  

Due to the uncertainty of the Company’s ability to meet its current operating expenses and the capital expenses noted above, in their report on the annual financial statements for the period ended March 31, 2006, the Company’s independent auditors included an explanatory paragraph regarding concerns about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The continuation of the Company’s business is dependent upon it raising additional financial support.  The issuance of additional equity securities by the Company could result in a significant dilution in the equity interests of the Company’s current stockholders.  Obtaining commercial loans, assuming those loans would be available, will increase the Company’s liabilities and future cash commitments.

There are no assurances that the Company will be able to obtain further funds required for its continued operations.  As noted herein, the Company intends to pursue various financing alternatives to meet its immediate and long-term financial requirements.  There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available to the Company when needed or, if available, that it can be obtained on commercially reasonable terms.  If the Company is not able to obtain the additional financing on a timely basis, it will be unable to conduct its operations as planned, and it will not be able to meet its other obligations as they become due.  In such event, the Company will be forced to scale down or perhaps even cease its operations.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

There are no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs—an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4”, which is the result of the FASB’s project to reduce differences between U.S. and international accounting standards. SFAS No. 151 requires idle facility costs, abnormal freight, handling costs, and amounts of wasted materials (spoilage) be treated as current-period costs.  Under this concept, if the costs associated with the actual level of spoilage or production defects are greater than the costs associated with the range of normal spoilage or defects, the difference would be charged to current-period expense, not included in inventory costs.  SFAS No. 151 will be effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005.  The adoption of SFAS No. 151 does not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In December 2004, FASB issued Statement No. 153, “Exchange of Nonmonetary Assets”. This statement addresses the measurement of exchanges of nonmonetary assets and eliminates the exception from fair value measurement for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with an exception for exchanges that do not have commercial substance.  A nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange.  This Statement is effective for periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of this new accounting pronouncement does have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements, as we do not have any exchanges of nonmonetary assets.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation".  SFAS 123(R) establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services.  This Statement focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions.  SFAS 123(R) requires that the fair value of such equity instruments be recognized as expense in the historical financial statements as services are performed.  Prior to SFAS 123(R), only certain pro-forma disclosures of fair value were required.  SFAS 123(R) shall be effective for us as of the beginning of the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after December 15, 2005. The adoption of this new accounting pronouncement does not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2005, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143 (“FIN 47”). FIN 47 requires the recognition of a liability for the fair value of a legally-required conditional asset retirement obligation when incurred, if the liability’s fair value can be reasonably estimated. FIN 47 also clarifies when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. FIN 47 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. The Company’s adoption of FIN 47 did not have an impact on its financial statements.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies

The Company’s audited financial statements and accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles used in the United States.  Preparing financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are affected by management's application of accounting policies.  The Company believes that understanding the basis and nature of the estimates and assumptions involved with the following aspects of its consolidated financial statements is critical to an understanding of its financials.


Mining Properties


Mineral property acquisition, exploration and development costs are expensed as incurred until such time as economic reserves are quantified.  From that time forward, the Company will capitalize all costs to the extent that future cash flows from mineral reserves equal or exceed the costs deferred.  The deferred costs will be amortized over the recoverable reserves when a property reaches commercial production.  Costs related to site restoration programs will be accrued over the life of the project.  To date, the Company has not established any proven reserves on its mineral properties.


As at March 31, 2006, the Company does not have any proven reserves.


Long-Lived Assets


Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable, in accordance with the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 (SFAS 144), Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets .  An impairment loss would be recognized when the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition.  The amount of the impairment loss to be recorded is calculated by the excess of the asset’s carrying value over its fair value.  Fair value is generally determined using a discounted cash flow analysis.


Going Concern


The Company’s annual financial statements have been prepared on the going concern basis, which assumes the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of operations.  The financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern.  However, certain conditions exist which raise doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.  The Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and have accumulated losses of $219,507 since inception through March 31, 2006.



Loans


On November 15, 2005, the Company obtained a monetary advance in the sum of $82,775.00 (the “ November Advance ”) from Financia Dacorey S.A. (“ Financia ”) in exchange for a promissory note (the “ November Promissory Note ”) by the Company in Financia’s favour. Based on the terms of the November Promissory Note, the November Advance is subject to a simple interest from the date of advance, and payable at maturity, equal to 5% per annum until actual payment is made.  The November Advance is due on demand by Financia.


On December 1, 2005, the Company obtained a monetary advance in the sum of $18,800.00 (the “ December Advance ”) from Financia in exchange for a promissory note (the “ December Promissory Note ”) by the Company in Financia’s favour. The terms of the December Promissory Note are the same as the terms of the November Promissory Note.


On January 6, 2006, the Company obtained a monetary advance in the sum of $100,000.00 (the “ January Advance ”) from Financia in exchange for a promissory note (the “ January Promissory Note ”) by the Company in Financia’s favour. The terms of the January Promissory Note are the same as the terms of the November and December Promissory Notes.

ITEM 7.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The information required under Item 310(a) of Regulation S-B is included in this report as set forth in the "Index to Financial Statement".


Index to Financial Statements


Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated

July 7, 2006

Consolidated Balance Sheets

Consolidated Statements of Operations

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity (Deficiency)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements





F-2


2







UREX ENERGY CORP.

(f/k/a LAKEFIELD VENTURES, INC.)

(An Exploration Stage Company)


FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


For the years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005






CONTENTS





 

Page

   

Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants

F-2

   

Balance Sheets

F-3

   

Statements of Operations

F-4

   

Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity (Deficiency)

F-5

   

Statements of Cash Flows

F-6

   

Notes to Financial Statements

    F-7-12









3







REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




To the Board of Directors and Shareholders

Urex Energy Corp., f/k/a Lakefield Ventures, Inc.


We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Urex Energy Corp., f/k/a Lakefield Ventures, Inc. (Company)  as of March 31, 2006 and 2005 and the related statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 and for the period from February 6, 2002 (inception) to March 31, 2006.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.


We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.


In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Urex Energy Corp, f/k/a Lakefield Ventures, Inc. as of March 31, 2006 and 2005 the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended and the period from February 6, 2002 (inception) to March 31, 2006 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern.  As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company incurred a net loss of $219,507 since inception, has not attained profitable operations and is dependent upon obtaining adequate financing to fulfill its exploration activities.  These factors raise substantial doubt that the Company will be able to continue as a going concern.  Management's plans in regard to these matters are also discussed in Note 1.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.


JEWETT, SCHWARTZ & ASSOCIATES

Hollywood, Florida

July 7, 2006



4








UREX ENERGY CORP

(f/k/a LAKEFIELD VENTURES INC.)


(An Exploration Stage Company)

REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


March 31, 2006 and 2005








5





UREX ENERGY CORP.

(f/k/a LAKEFIELD VENTURES, INC.)

(An Exploration Stage Company)

BALANCE SHEETS

March 31, 2006 and 2005



ASSETS

2006

2005

     

Current

   

Cash

$

34,572

$

492

Prepaids

                    136

                      -

     Account receivables

                15,000

                       -

 

               49,708

                  492

     

Other assets, net

-

                 100


Advance on assignment agreement

               50,000

                       -

 



     

TOTAL  ASSETS

$

99,708

$

592

     

LIABILITIES

     

Current

   

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

$

50,138

$

416

     Note payable to related party

               22,500

             22,500

     Note payables

             204,577

                       -

 

             277,215

             22,916

     

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

   

STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY

 



 



Capital stock

   

Authorized:

     

150,000,000

common shares with a par value of $0.001

   

Issued and outstanding:

   

39,212,800

common shares (2006 and 2005 )

39,213

39,213

Additional paid-in capital

2,787

2,787

Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage

(219,507 )

(64,324 )

     

Total stockholders' deficiency

 (177,507)

(22,324)

     

Total liabilities and stockholders' deficiency

$

99,708

$

592

     






6





UREX ENERGY CORP.

(f/k/a LAKEFIELD VENTURES, INC.)

(An Exploration Stage Company)

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 and

For the period February 6, 2002 (date of Inception) to March 31, 2006




     

February 6, 2002

     

(Date of Inception)

   

to March 31,

 

2006

2005

2006

       

Revenues

$

-

$

-

$

-

       

Expenses

     

Management fees

 60,000

                      -

 60,000

Professional fees

 34,794

               9,500

 63,529

Exploration costs

 39,276

             16,000

 55,276

     Interest on loans

                 3,002

                      -

                  3,002

General and administrative costs

               18,111

             10,189

 28,700

       
 

 155,183

             35,689

 219,507

       

Net loss for the period

$ (155,183)

$ (35,689 )

$ (219,507 )

       

Basic and diluted loss per share

$ (0.00 )

$             (0.00 )

 
       

Weighted average number of shares

 outstanding - basic and diluted


 39,212,800


 39,463,450

 
       









7





UREX ENERGY CORP.

(f/k/a LAKEFIELD VENTURES, INC.)

(An Exploration Stage Company)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the years ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 and

For the period February 6, 2002 (Date of Inception) to March 31, 2006




     

February 6, 2002

     

(Date of Inception)

     

to March 31,

 

2006

2005

2006

       

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

     

Net loss for the period

$ (155,183)

$ (35,689)

$ (219,507)

          Amortization

                    100

                   800

                 2,500

Adjustments to reconcile loss to cash used by

 operating activities:

     

Accounts receivable

 (15,000)

 -

 (15,000)

Prepaids

                  (136)

 -

 (136)

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 49,722

                   416

 50,138

       

Net cash used in operating activities

 (120,497)

 (34,473)

 (182,005)

       

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

     

     Option agreement

                        -

                      -

               (2,500)

Assignment agreement advance

               (50,000)

                      -

 (50,000)

       

Net cash used in investing activities

              (50,000)

                       -

              (52,500)

       

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

     

 Shares issued for cash

 -

 -

   42,000

      Notes payable

             204,577

                       -

             204,577

      Notes payable to related party

                         -

              22,500

                22,500

       

Net cash provided by financing activities

 204,577

 22,500

  269,077

       
       

Increase (decrease) in cash during the period

 34,080

 (11,973)

 34,572

       

Cash, beginning of the period

 492

 12,465

 -

       

Cash, end of the period

$ 34,572

$ 492

$ 34,572

       






8





UREX ENERGY CORP.

(f/k/a LAKEFIELD VENTURES, INC.)

(An Exploration Stage Company)

STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)

For the period February 6, 2002 (Date of Inception) to March 31, 2006



     

Deficit

 
 

Common Stock

   

Accumulated

 
     

Share

Additional

During the

 
 

Number of

 

Subscriptions

Paid-in

Exploration

 
 

Shares

Amount

Received

Capital

Stage

Total

             

Balance, February 2, 2002

                  -

  $               -

   $                -

   $              -

    $             -

   $             -

             

Shares issued at $0.001

 16,710,000

 16,710

                   -

     (15,210)

                  -

  1,500

Shares issued at $0.01

 17,267,000

       17,267

                  -

      (1,767)

                 -

        15,500

Net loss for the period

                 -

                -

                   -

                -

                  -

                  -

Balance, March 31, 2002

 33,977,000

$     33,977

 $               -

  $ (16,977)

   $           -

  $    17,000

             

Shares issued at $0.05

  2,729,300

         2,729

                  -

        9,521

                -

        12,250

Net loss for the period

                -

                -

                  -

               -

      (25,559)

        (25,559)

Balance, March 31, 2003

36,706,300

$    36,706

 $               -

  $  (7,456)              -

   $ (25,559)

  $      3,691

             

Shares issued at $0.05

  2,840,700

        2,841

                  -

        9,909

                -

        12,750

Net loss for the period

                -

                -

                   -

               -

       (3,076)

        (3,076)

Balance, March 31, 2004

39,547,000

$    39,547

 $               -

  $   2,453

   $ (28,635)

  $    13,365

             

Cancellation of stock

   (334,200)

         (334)

                  -

          334

                -

                 -

Net loss for the period

              -

               -

                  -

               -

      (35,689)

      (35,689)

Balance, March 31, 2005

 39,212,800

$    39,213

 $               -

  $   2,787

   $ (64,324)

  $  (22,324)

             

Net loss for the period

               -

               -

                  -

               -

   (155,183)

    (155,183)

Balance, March 31, 2006

 39,212,800

$    39,213

 $               -

  $   2,787

 $(219,507)

 $ (177,507)

             






9





UREX ENERGY CORP.

(f/k/a LAKEFIELD VENTURES, INC.)

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2006



Note 1

Nature and Continuance of Operations

              ------------------------------------

            Urex Energy Corp, f/k/a Lakefield Ventures, Inc. (Company) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on February 6, 2002 and changed its fiscal year end from September 30 to March 31. The Company has been in the exploration stage since its formation and has not realized any revenues from its planned operations.  The Company is primarily engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mining properties.  Upon location of a commercial minable reserve, the Company expects to actively prepare the site for its extraction and enter into a development stage.


Going Concern

-------------------------------------

These financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as an going concern.  The  Company  has  accumulated  a  deficit  of $219,507  since inception,  has yet to achieve  profitable  operations and further losses are anticipated in the development of its business, raising substantial  doubt  about the  Company's  ability to continue as a going  concern.  At March 31, 2006, the Company had a working capital deficit of $277,507.  Its  ability to  continue  as a going  concern is dependent  upon the ability of the Company to generate  profitable operations in the future and/or to obtain the necessary  financing to meet its  obligations  and repay its  liabilities  arising from normal  business  operations  when they come due. These  financial statements  do not  include  any  adjustments  to the  amounts and classification  of assets and  liabilities  that may be  necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going  concern.  The Company anticipates that additional funding will be in the form of equity financing from the sale of common stock and/or commercial borrowing.  There can be no assurance that capital will be available, it will be on terms acceptable to the Company.  The issuances of additional equity securities by the Company would result in a dilution in the equity interests of its current stockholders. The Company may also seek to obtain short-term loans from the directors of the Company.  There are no current arrangements in place for equity funding or short-term loans.


Note 2

 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

              ------------------------------------------

             The financial statements have, in management's opinion, been properly prepared within


the framework of the significant accounting policies summarized below:


Basis of Presentation

             ---------------------

             The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with   accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  



                                


UREX ENERGY CORP.

(f/k/a LAKEFIELD VENTURES, INC.)

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2006 - Page 2



Note 2   Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (cont'd)

              ------------------------------------------


             Exploration Stage Company

              -----------------------------

             The Company is an exploration stage company as defined in the Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 7. It is primarily engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mining properties.  All losses accumulated since inception, have been considered as part of the Company’s exploration stage activities.


Use of Estimates

--------------------

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.


             Mineral Property Costs

              ----------------------

Mineral property acquisition, exploration and development costs are expensed as incurred until such time as economic reserves are quantified.  From that time forward, the Company will capitalize all costs to the extent that future cash flows from mineral reserves equal or exceed the costs deferred.  The deferred costs will be amortized over the recoverable reserves when a property reaches commercial production.  Costs related to site restoration programs will be accrued over the life of the project.  To date, the Company has not established any proven reserves on its mineral properties.


             Financial Instruments

              ---------------------

             Fair value estimates of financial instruments are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant information about financial markets and specific financial instruments.  As these estimates are subjective in nature, involving uncertainties and matters of significant judgement, they cannot be determined with precision.  Changes in assumptions can significantly affect estimated fair value.  For the purpose of this disclosure, the fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced sale of liquidation.


The carrying values of cash, accounts payable and loan payable approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of these instruments.  Management is of the opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest or credit risks arising from these financial instruments.  



UREX ENERGY CORP.

(f/k/a LAKEFIELD VENTURES, INC.)

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2006 - Page 3



Note 2   Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (cont'd)

              ------------------------------------------

 

Environmental Costs

              -------------------

             Environmental expenditures that relate to current operations are expensed or capitalized as appropriate.  Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations, and which do not contribute to current or future revenue generation, are               expensed.  Liabilities are recorded when environmental assessments and/or  remedial  efforts  are  probable,  and  the  cost  can  be reasonably  estimated.  Generally, the timing of these accruals coincides with the earlier of completion of a feasibility study or               the Company's commitments to plan of action based on the then known facts.


              Income Taxes

              ------------

             The Company uses the assets and liability method of accounting for income taxes pursuant to SFAS No. 109 "Accounting for Income Taxes".   Under the assets and liability method of SFAS No. 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  A deferred tax asset will be recorded when it is more likely than not that it will be realized.   Since the Company is in the exploration stage and has had continuous losses, no deferred tax asset or income taxes have been recorded in the financial statements.


             Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share

              --------------------------------

             The Company reports basic loss per share in accordance with the SFAS No.  128, "Earnings Per Share".  Basic loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share has not been provided as it would be anti-dilutive.


Recent Accounting Pronouncements

              ------------------------

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 123(R), “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”.  SFAS 123(R) establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services.  This Statement focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions.  SFAS 123(R) requires that the fair value of such equity instruments be recognized as expense in the historical financial statements as services are performed.  Prior to SFAS 123(R), only certain pro-forma disclosures of fair value were required.  SFAS 123(R) shall be effective for the Company as of the beginning of the first interim

UREX ENERGY CORP.

LAKEFIELD VENTURES INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2006 - Page 4



Note 2   Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (cont'd)


Recent Accounting Pronouncements

              ------------------------


or annual reporting period that begins April 1, 2006.  The adoption of FASB No. 123(R), will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In March 2005, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143 (“FIN 47”). FIN 47 requires the recognition of a liability for the fair value of a legally-required conditional asset retirement obligation when incurred, if the liability’s fair value can be reasonably estimated. FIN 47 also clarifies when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. FIN 47 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. The Company’s adoption of FIN 47 did not have an impact on its financial statements.


Note 3   Mineral Properties

              ----------------

 On April 15, 2002, the Company entered into an Option Agreement to acquire 90% interest in a total of six mineral claims located in the Levy Township in Quebec, Canada.  In order to earn its interests, the Company made a cash payment totaling $2,500 upon consummating the agreement.  Under the terms of the agreement the Company is required to incur exploration expenditures totaling $150,000 of which $15,000 was required to be expended by December 31, 2004 and $135,000 was required to be expended by December 31, 2005.  The properties are subject to 1% net smelter return royalty fees.  During December 2004, $15,000 was expensed in accordance with the requirements of the option agreement.  The Company has abandoned its interest on this option agreement.


On September 22, 2005, the Company entered into an Assignment Agreement with International Mineral Resources Ltd. (“IMR”), whereby IMR assigned its right, title and interest in the Option Agreement entered between IMR and United Energy Metals, SA (“UEM”) to the Company.  The Option Agreement allows for the holder of the option to acquire 99.8% of UEM, an Argentina company which in turn holds a 100% interest in a commanding property position of 170,000 hectares adjacent to the Cerro Solo Uranium deposit known as the “Rio Chubut” property.   As consideration for the assignment of the Option from IMR to the Company, the Company is required to issue to IMR 8,000,000 common shares of the Company and pay IMR $50,000.  Furthermore, IMR will retain a 5% net smelter royalty.  The Company paid IMR $50,000 in January 2006 and subsequent to its year end, the Company issued 8,000,000 common shares of the Company to IMR in June 2006.




10






UREX ENERGY CORP.

(f/k/a LAKEFIELD VENTURES, INC.)

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2006 - Page 5



Note 3   Mineral Properties (cont’d)

              ----------------


In December 2005, the Company acquired 100% interest in the La Jara Mesa Extension uranium property consisting of 137 unpatented mining claims of approximately 2,740 acres through staking, in the Grants Mining District of Cibola County in New Mexico, USA.  The Company plans to commence a drilling exploration program as soon as financing is arranged.


Note 4

Related Party Transactions

--------------------------------

On December 10, 2004, the Company issued a note payable in the amount of  $25,000 to the former President of the Company for the purpose of funding exploration activities.  The note bears no interest and is due and payable on demand.  As at March 31, 2006, the balance of the loan is $22,500.


Effective October 1, 2005, the Company began paying a management consulting agreement with Minera Teles Pires Inc., a company controlled by the President and director of the Company.  The agreement provides a fixed fee of $10,000 per month of which $5,000 is paid and the other $5,000 deferred until financing is obtained by the Company.  As at year end, $30,000 in management fee has been paid to Minera Teles Pires Inc. and $30,000 has been accrued.


Note 6

Promissory Notes Payable

-----------------------------


The promissory notes payable are unsecured and bear interest at 5% per annum.  They are due on demand.


November 15, 2005

$   84,317

 

December 01, 2005

     19,109

 

January 06, 2006

   101,151

 
     
 

$ 204,577

 
     




Note 7

Shareholder’s Equity

------------------------

On June 2, 2005, the Company affected a forward stock split of 11.14 common shares for each 1 share issued and outstanding.  At the same time, the Company’s authorized capital was increased from 50,000,000 common shares to 150,000,000 common shares.


UREX ENERGY CORP.

(f/k/a LAKEFIELD VENTURES, INC.)

(An Exploration Stage Company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2006 - Page 6





Note 8

Subsequent Events

----------------------

Subsequent to March 31, 2006, the Company has consummated its Assignment Agreement with International Mineral Resources Ltd.


The Company established a wholly owned subsidiary in the State of Nevada named Urex Energy Corp. (“Urex”) on June 8, 2006.  Concurrently, the Company and Urex entered into an agreement and plan of merger whereby Urex and Lakefield agreed to be merged with and into Lakefield, with Lakefield remaining as the surviving company under the name "Urex Energy Corp."  


The Company’s authorized capital was increased due to the merger from 150,000,000 common shares to 300,000,000 common shares, and included an additional authorized 10,000,000 preferred shares with par value of $0.001 per share.


The Company also affected a forward stock split of 2 common shares for each 1 share issued and outstanding.  The merger and forward stock split became effective as of July 3, 2006.  The total issued and outstanding shares post-split is 94,425,600 common shares.





21






ITEM 8.    CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

Currently, the Company’s independent accountants are Jewett, Schwartz & Associates, of 2514 Hollywood Blvd., Suite 508, Hollywood, FL  33020.  The Company had no disagreements with its accountants during the year ended March 31, 2006.

ITEM 8A.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls


Disclosure controls and procedures means controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq. ) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.


Conclusions


Based upon their evaluation of our controls, the chief executive officer and principal accounting officer have concluded that, disclosure controls are effective providing reasonable assurance that material information relating to us is made known to management on a timely basis during the period when our reports are being prepared.  There were no changes in our internal controls that occurred during the quarter covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls.



ITEM 8B.    OTHER INFORMATION.


Not Applicable.


PART III

ITEM 9.    DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT.

Current Directors and Executive Officers


As of the date of this Annual Report, the Company’s directors and executive officers are as follows:


NAME

AGE

OFFICE HELD

Richard Bachman (1)

51

President and Director

Luis Goyzueta (2)

31

Director

Michael Iverson (3)

53

Director


Notes:

(1)

Mr. Bachman was appointed a Director and President of the Company on September 28, 2005.

(2)

Mr. Goyzueta was appointed a Director of the Company on August 31, 2005.

(3)

Mr. Iverson was appointed a Director of the Company on March 1, 2002.  Mr. Iverson resigned as President of the Company on September 28, 2005.


The Directors hold their positions until the next annual general meeting of the Company’s shareholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified.  The Company’s executive officers serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors.


The backgrounds of our directors and executive officers are as follows:


RICHARD BACHMAN : Mr. Bachman has been the President and a director of the Company since September 28, 2005.  Mr. Bachman’s work experience includes 22 years working with Homestake Mining Company in various capacities ranging from exploration to mine operations. From 1995 to 1998, he was the Regional Geologist for Brazil where he directed a staff of 46 and was responsible for a $2.5 million annual exploration budget. He conducted a countrywide assessment that resulted in the acquisition of a one million hectare property in a 20 million ounce gold district in the Amazon.


From 1999 to 2000 Mr. Bachman was the Regional Geologist for Peru where he directed a staff of 10 and refocused Homestake’s existing exploration program, which resulted in the evaluation of 83 properties in 24 months and yielded one new discovery. From 2001 to 2002, he was Homestake’s Regional Geologist, International Special Projects, where he designed and successfully implemented reconnaissance programs in southern Argentina that resulted in the evaluation of 63 properties with five advancing and the coordination and field review of 22 properties.


From 2002 until now, Mr. Bachman has acted as President and Consulting Professional Geologist for Minera Teles Pires Inc., a Reno, Nevada company. Mr. Bachman holds a Bachelors of Science degree in Geological Engineering from the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology and is a Certified Professional Geologist with the American Institute of Professional Geologists.


LUIS HUMBERTO GOYZUETA : Mr. Goyzueta has been a director of the Company since August 31, 2005.  Mr. Goyzueta has an impressive track record spanning over seven years working as an executive with natural resource companies in Peru.  He is General Manager and serves on the Board of Directors of Interpacific Oil, Peru´s only biodiesel company.  He also serves on the Board of Directors of Oiltec, Gulf Oil International's partner in Peru.  Furthermore, he is President of two Peruvian mining companies, Compania Minera Moria and Minera Inka Sol.  In addition to his Peruvian natural resource expertise, Mr. Goyzueta holds a degree in Economics and Finance from Bentley College in Boston, and has a large network of high level contacts throughout Latin America.  Mr. Goyuzeta is also a director of Andresmin Gold Corp.


MICHAEL IVERSON: Mr. Michael Iverson has been a director of the Company since March 1, 2002 and served as the President of the Company until September 28, 2005.  Mr. Iverson has spent the last 12 years managing and administrating public companies in the exploration and mining sector.  From 1992 to 2000 Mr. Iverson served as a director and president of Sasha Ventures (now eShippers Management Ltd.) a TSX listed company that maintains a web based application service, Inter Shipper, which delivers shipping information for all shipping rate tables.  From 1998 to present Mr. Iverson is a director and recently become the President of Niogold Corporation, a TSX listed mining and exploration company.  From 1998 to present Mr. Iverson has served as a director and CEO of Fortuna Ventures Inc., a TSX listed mining and exploration company. Even though Mr. Iverson lacks the professional, and technical credentials he has a vast amount of hands on experience and knowledge in the exploration and mining sector, where his duties have included administrating and managing the day to operations of a public mining exploration company as well as hiring, coordinating and overseeing exploration crews.  


Significant Employees /Consultants

Mr. Richard Bachman provides his services to the Company through a consulting agreement entered into between the Company and Minera Teles Pires Inc., dated September 27, 2005.  

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

To our knowledge, during the past five years, no present or former director or executive officer of the Company: (1) filed a petition under the federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law, nor had a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer appointed by a court for the business or present of such a person, or any partnership in which he was a general partner at or within two yeas before the time of such filing, or any corporation or business association of which he was an executive officer within two years before the time of such filing; (2) was convicted in a criminal proceeding or named subject of a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses); (3) was the subject of any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining him from or otherwise limiting the following activities: (i) acting as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage transaction merchant, associated person of any of the foregoing, or as an investment advisor, underwriter, broker or dealer in securities, or as an affiliated person, director of any investment company, or engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with such activity; (ii) engaging in any type of business practice; (iii) engaging in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or commodity or in connection with any violation of federal or state securities laws or federal commodity laws; (4) was the subject of any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any federal or state authority barring, suspending or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days the right of such person to engage in any activity described above under this Item, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity; (5) was found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Securities and Exchange Commission to have violated any federal or state securities law and the judgment in subsequently reversed, suspended or vacate; (6) was found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated any federal commodities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated.



22






Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, as amended, requires our executive officers, directors and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of our shares of common stock to file reports of their beneficial ownership and changes in ownership (Forms 3, 4 and 5, and any amendment thereto) with the SEC.  Executive officers, directors, and greater-than-ten percent holders are required to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

Based solely upon a review of the Forms 3, 4, and 5 furnished to us for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, we have determined that our directors, officers, and greater than 10% beneficial owners complied with all applicable Section 16 filing requirements, except as described below.

Mr. Michael Iverson failed to timely file his initial Form 3 relating to his appointment as a director and executive officer of the Company when the Company first became a reporting issuer.  Mr. Iverson has been informed of such, and is in the process of filing his Form 3.

Mr. Luis Goyzueta failed to timely file his initial Form 3 relating to his appointment as a director of the Company on August 31, 2005.  Mr. Goyzueta has been informed of such, and is in the process of filing his Form 3.

Mr. Richard Bachman has failed to timely file his initial Form 3 relating to his appointment as a director and executive officer of the Company on September 28, 2005.  However, Mr. Bachman filed his Form 3 on July 13, 2006.  In addition, Mr. Bachman failed to file his Form 4 within two days of June 8, 2006, the date on which International Mineral Resources Ltd. (“IMR”), a company wholly owned by Mr. Bachman, was issued 8,000,000 (pre-split) shares in accordance with the Assignment Agreement discussed above.  However, Mr. Bachman filed his Form 4 on July 13, 2006.

IMR has failed to timely file its initial Form 3 relating to the issuance of 8,000,000 (pre-split) shares in accordance with the Assignment Agreement discussed above.  IMR has been informed of such, and is in the process of obtaining EDGAR codes in order to file its Form 3.

Information concerning the Company's audit committee, including designation of the "Audit Committee Financial Expert" under applicable Securities and Exchange Commission rules

At the present time, the Company does not have an audit committee, nor does it employ a financial expert.  We currently rely on our book-keeper, our accountant, and our auditor to prepare and audit our financial statements, and, of these, only our book-keeper is a full time employee of the Company.  The Company intends to appoint an audit committee in the near future.

Code of Ethics

At the present time, the Company has not adopted a code of ethics as it is still in the early stages of developing its business.  The Company intends to adopt a code of ethics in the future.

ITEM 10.    EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

The following table sets forth information with respect to compensation paid by the Company to the Chief Executive Officer during the three most recent fiscal years.  The Company did not have any other highly compensated executive officers with annual salary and bonus in excess of $100,000 per year.




23






Name and principal position



(a)

Year




(b)

Annual compensation

Long-term compensation

Salary
($)


(c)

Bonus
($)


(d)

Other annual compensation
($)


(e)

Awards

Payouts

All other
compensation
($)


(i)

Restricted
stock
award(s)
($)

(f)

Securities
underlying
options/
SARs
(#)

(g)

LTIP
payouts
($)

(h)

Richard Bachman (1)


President, & Director

2006

60,000

(3)

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Michael Iverson (2)


Director

2006

2005

2004

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

Notes:

(1)

Mr. Bachman was appointed the President of the Company on September 28, 2005.

(2)

Mr. Iverson resigned as the Company’s President on September 28, 2005.

(3)

Effective October 1, 2005, the Company began paying under a management consulting agreement with Minera Teles Pires Inc., a company controlled by Mr. Bachman.  The agreement provides a fixed fee of $10,000 per month of which $5,000 is paid and the other $5,000 deferred until financing is obtained by the Company.  As at yearend, $30,000 in management fee has been paid to Minera Teles Pires Inc. and $30,000 has been accrued.


ITEM 11.    SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS


The following table sets forth information as of the date of this Annual Report, with respect to the Company’s directors, named executive officers, and each person who is known by the Company to own beneficially, more than five percent (5%) of the Company’s common stock, and with respect to shares owned beneficially by all of the Company’s directors and executive officers as a group.  Common Stock not outstanding but deemed beneficially owned by virtue of the right of an individual to acquire shares within 60 days is treated as outstanding only when determining the amount and percentage of Common Stock owned by such individual.  Except as noted, each person or entity has sole voting and sole investment power with respect to the shares shown.


As of the date of this Annual Report, there are 94,425,600 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.


Name and Address of Beneficial Owner


Position

Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership

Percent of

Common Stock (1)

Michael Iverson

24549 – 53rd Ave.

Langley, B.C.

Canada  V2Z 1H6

Director

33,420,000 shares

(Direct ownership)

35.39%

Richard Bachman

c/o 10580 N. McCarran Blvd., Building 115-208

Reno, NV  89503

President and Director

16,000,000 (2)

(Indirect ownership)

16.94%



24






Luis Goyzueta

Calle Alonso de Molina

332 Monterrico, Surco

Lima, Peru

Director

Nil

Nil

International Mineral Resources Ltd. (3)

c/o No. 1 Caribbean Place

P.O. Box 97

Leeward Highway

Providenciales

Turks & Caicos Islands

BWI

Shareholder

16,000,000 (4)

(Direct ownership)

16.94%

All Directors and Officers as a group (3 persons)

 

49,420,000 (5)

52.33%


(1)

Beneficial ownership of common stock has been determined for this purpose in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act, under which a person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of securities if such person has or shares voting power or investment power with respect to such securities, has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days or acquires such securities with the purpose or effect of changing or influencing the control of the Company.

(2)

This figure includes 16,000,000 (post-split shares on a basis of two new for each one old share effective July 3, 2006) held by International Mineral Resources Ltd. (“IMR”), of which Mr. Richard Bachman has sole voting and dispositive power of the 16,000,000 shares held by IMR.

(3)

Mr. Richard Bachman is the beneficial owner of IMR.

(4)

IMR is a corporation organized under the laws of the Turks & Caicos Islands, BWI, and Mr. Bachman has sole voting and dispositive power of the 16,000,000 shares held by IMR.

(5)

This figure includes 33,420,000 shares held directly by Michael Iverson and 16,000,000 shares indirectly owned by Richard Bachman through IMR, of which Mr. Bachman has sole voting and dispositive power.

ITEM 12.    CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.

None of our directors or officers, nor any proposed nominee for election as a director, nor any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, shares carrying more than 10% of the voting rights attached to all of our outstanding shares, nor any promoter, nor any relative or spouse of any of the foregoing persons has any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction since our incorporation or in any presently proposed transaction which, in either case, has or will materially affect us, other than as described below.


Mr. Bachman, the President and a Director of the Company, is the sole shareholder of IMR.  


Mr. Bachman was the sole shareholder of IMR during the time the Company entered into its Assignment Agreement with IMR, dated September 22, 2005, however, Mr. Bachman did not hold any positions with the Company as at that time.  

On September 27, 2005, the Company entered into a Consulting Agreement with Minera Teles Pires Inc. (“ Minera ”), a Nevada corporation, whereby Mr. Richard Bachman on behalf of Minera will provide administrative and technical consulting services in North America or other locations as requested by the Company, which includes, but is not limited to: (i) acting as President and Director of the Company; (ii) managing and advising on procedures and protocols related to the exploration programs related to the Rio Chubut Uranium Project in Southern Argentina; and (iii) directing the Company’s acquisition program by providing leadership in negotiations on third party mineral properties.  As compensation to Minera for the services to be provided by Mr. Bachman, the Company agreed to pay a monthly consulting fee of $10,000, however, until sufficient financing is obtained the Company will pay one half of the $10,000 monthly fee ($5,000) with the remaining $5,000 to be deferred until financing is obtained.  In addition, the Company agreed to pay all out-of-pocket expenses, including, but not limited to: (i) transportation and reasonable living expenses to, from and whole located at the job site – air fare by coach class; (ii) car rental charges including insurance coverage, in the event a rental car is required to commute to, from, and while operating at the job site; and (iii) long distance telephone charges, photocopy, drafting and plotting services if not provided at the Company’s location.

Our management is involved in other business activities and may, in the future become involved in other business opportunities. If a specific business opportunity becomes available, such persons may face a conflict in selecting between our business and their other business interests.  In the event that a conflict of interest arises at a meeting of our directors, a director who has such a conflict will disclose his interest in a proposed transaction and will abstain from voting for or against the approval of such transaction.

ITEM 13.    EXHIBITS

The following exhibits are filed as part of this Annual Report:

Exhibit #

 

3.1 *

Articles and Bylaws

3.2

Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation filed June 2, 2005

3.3

Certificate of Change filed June 2, 2005

3.4

Articles of Incorporation of Urex Energy Corp. filed June 7, 2006

3.5 (1)

Articles of Merger filed on June 8, 2006 and which is effective June 21, 2006

3.6 (2)

Certificate of Change filed June 8, 2006 and which is effective June 21, 2006

3.7 (3)

Certificate of Correction filed June 23, 2006 with respect to the Certificate of Change

3.8 (4)

Certificate of Correction filed June 23, 2006 with respect to the Articles of Merger

10.1

Assignment Agreement between the Company and International Mineral Resources Inc., dated September 22, 2005

10.2

Option Agreement between International Mineral Resources Inc. and United Energy Metals S.A., dated September 21, 2005

10.3

Agreement and Plan of Merger between Urex Energy Corp. and Lakefield Ventures Inc., dated June 8, 2006

23.1

Consent of Brian Cole, P.Geo., Geologist (included in Exhibit 99.2)

31.1

Certificate pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)

31.2

Certificate pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)

32.1

Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

32.2

Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

99.1

Consulting Agreement between the Company and Minera Teles Pires Inc., dated September 27, 2005

99.2

Independent Review of the Rio Chubut Uranium Project prepared by Brian Cole, P.Geo., dated September 23, 2005


(*)   Previously filed as an exhibit to our registration statement on Form 10-SB filed on February 27, 2003 and incorporated by reference

(1)   Previously filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K filed on July 5, 2006 and incorporated by reference

(2)   Previously filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 8-K filed on July 5, 2006 and incorporated by reference

(3)   Previously filed as Exhibit 99.3 to the Form 8-K filed on July 5, 2006 and incorporated by reference

(4)   Previously filed as Exhibit 99.4 to the Form 8-K filed on July 5, 2006 and incorporated by reference




25






ITEM 14.    PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

(1) Audit Fees


Our current principal accountants, Jewett, Schwartz & Associates, and our former principal accountants, Morgan and Company billed the following fees for the services indicated.


2006 - $12,300

2005 – $10,000

2004 - $3,000


(2) Audit - Related Fees


The aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for assurance and related services by the principal accountants that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements and are not reported in the preceding paragraph:


2006 - Nil

2005 - Nil

2004 – Nil



(3) Tax Fees


The aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning was:


2006 - Nil

2005 – Nil

2004 – Nil


(4) All Other Fees


The aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for the products and services provided by the principal accountant, other than the services reported in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) was:

 

2006 - Nil

2005 – Nil

2004 – Nil


Audit fees consist of fees related to professional services rendered in connection with the audit of our annual financial statements, the review of the financial statements included in each of our quarterly reports on Form 10-QSB.


Our board of directors’ policy is to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services performed by the independent accountants.  These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services.  Under our board of directors’ policy, pre-approval is generally provided for particular services or categories of services, including planned services, project based services and routine consultations.  In addition, our board of directors may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis.  Our board of directors approved all services that our independent accountants provided to us in the past two fiscal years.




26






SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on this 13 th day of July, 2006.

 

UREX ENERGY CORP.

(Registrant)

 

By: /s/ Richard Bachman

 

 

 

Richard Bachman

 

 President and Director

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

Signature

 

Title

 

Date

/s/ Richard Bachman


Richard Bachman

 

President and Director

 

July 13, 2006


/s/ Luis Goyzueta


Luis Goyzueta


 


Director


 

July 13, 2006


/s/ Michael Iverson


Michael Iverson


 


Director


 

July 13, 2006
























__________









ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT




Among :



INTERNATIONAL MINERAL RESOURCES LTD.



And :



LAKEFIELD VENTURES, INC.


























__________






ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT





THIS ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT is dated and made for reference effective as fully executed on this 22 nd day of September, 2005.



BETWEEN :


INTERNATIONAL MINERAL RESOURCES LTD. , a company duly incorporated under the laws of the Turks and Caicos Islands and having an office address located at No. 1 Caribbean Place, P.O. Box 97, Leeward Highway, Providenciales, Turks and Caicos Islands;



(the “ Assignor ”);

OF THE FIRST PART


AND :


LAKEFIELD VENTURES, INC. , a company duly incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada and having an address for notice and delivery located at 10580 N. McCarran Blvd., Building 115-208, Reno, Nevada, 89503;



(the “ Assignee ”);

OF THE SECOND PART



(the Assignor and the Assignee being hereinafter singularly also referred to as a “ Party ” and collectively referred to as the “ Parties ” as the context so requires).



WHEREAS :


A.

The Assignor is a body corporate subsisting under and registered pursuant to the laws of the Turks and Caicos Islands;


B.

The Assignor is a creditor of United Energy Metals S.A., a company incorporated under the laws of Argentina, in the amount of US$70,300, which is owing from United Energy Metals S.A. to the Assignor (the “Debt”);


C.

The Assignor is the owner of an option (the “Option”) to acquire 499 shares in the capital stock of United Energy Metals S.A. pursuant to an Option Agreement entered into between the Assignor and United Energy Metals S.A., dated September 21, 2005 (the “Option Agreement”).  


D.

United Energy Metals S.A. is in the business of acquiring, exploring and developing mineral properties in Argentina and is the legal and beneficial owner of certain permits and applications for uranium exploration and exploitation in the Province of Chubut, Argentina;


E.

The Assignor desires to assign and transfer the Debt and the Option it holds to acquire 499 shares of capital stock of United Energy Metals S.A. to the Assignee in exchange for certain consideration in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement;


F.

The Assignee is prepared to accept the assignment and transfer of the Debt and the Option;


G.

The Parties hereto have agreed to enter into this Assignment Agreement (the “ Assignment Agreement ”) which formalizes, in its entirety, the Assignment Agreement, as contemplated, and which clarifies their respective duties and obligations in connection with the assignment by the Assignor to the Assignee of the Debt and the Option;



NOW THEREFORE THIS ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT WITNESSETH that in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and agreements herein contained, THE PARTIES HERETO COVENANT AND AGREE WITH EACH OTHER as follows:


Article 1

SCHEDULES AND INTERPRETATIONS


1.1

Schedules .    For the purposes of this Assignment Agreement, except as otherwise expressly provided or unless the context otherwise requires, the following shall represent the Schedules which are attached to this Assignment Agreement and which form a material part hereof:


     Schedule

    Description


Schedule “A”:

Acknowledgement of Representations, Warranties and Covenants by United Energy Metals S.A.; and

Schedule “B”:

Net Smelter Return Royalty.


1.2

Interpretation .    For the purposes of this Assignment Agreement, except as otherwise expressly provided or unless the context otherwise requires:


(a)

the words “herein”, “hereof” and “hereunder” and other words of similar import refer to this Assignment Agreement as a whole and not to any particular Article, section or other subdivision of this Assignment Agreement;


(b)

any reference to an entity shall include and shall be deemed to be a reference to any entity that is a permitted successor to such entity; and


(c)

words in the singular include the plural and words in the masculine gender include the feminine and neuter genders, and vice versa .



Article 2

ASSIGNMENT AND TRANSFER OF THE DEBT AND THE OPTION HELD BY THE ASSIGNOR IN UNITED ENERGY METALS S.A. TO THE ASSIGNEE


2.1

Assignment of the Debt and the Option .   Subject to the terms and conditions hereof and based upon the representations and warranties contained in Articles “3” and “4” hereinbelow and prior satisfaction of the conditions precedent which are set forth in Article “5” hereinbelow, the Assignor hereby agrees, to assign and transfer at the Closing Date (as hereinafter determined) all of its respective rights, entitlement and interest in and to the Debt and the Option to the Assignee and the Assignee hereby agrees to accept the assignment and transfer of the Debt and the Option from the Assignor on the terms and subject to the conditions contained in this Assignment Agreement.



2.2

Consideration for Assignment of the Debt and the Option .   The total consideration to be paid by the Assignee to the Assignor on the Closing Date for the assignment of the Debt and the Option to the Assignee will be as follows:


(a)

US$50,000 by way of a bank draft or certified cheque;


(b)

issue to the Assignor 8,000,000 shares of the Assignee (the “Purchase Price Common Shares”), subject to applicable resale restrictions;


(c)

pay to the Assignor the Royalty as per Article 7 below; and


(d)

On or before ten (10) business days after the execution of this Assignment Agreement, the Assignee shall pay US$30,000 to the Assignor with the balance of US$20,000 to be paid on the Closing Date.  Such US$30,000 to be paid on or before 10 business days after execution of this Assignment Agreement shall be refundable if it is determined prior to the Closing Date that any shares which may be issued under the Option Agreement are not allowed to be registered to the Assignee due to any applicable Argentina laws.



ARTICLE 3

REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES AND COVENANTS

BY THE ASSIGNOR


3.1

Representations, Warranties and Covenants by the Assignor .   In order to induce the Assignee to enter into and consummate this Assignment Agreement, the Assignor hereby represents to, warrants to and covenants with the Assignee, with the intent that the Assignee will rely thereon in entering into this Assignment Agreement and in concluding the transactions contemplated herein, that, to the best of the knowledge, information and belief of the Assignor, after having made due inquiry:


(a)

it is duly incorporated under the laws of its respective jurisdiction of incorporation and is validly existing and in good standing with respect to all statutory filings required by the applicable corporate laws;


(b)

it is qualified to do business in those jurisdictions where it is necessary to fulfill its obligations under this Assignment Agreement and it has the full power and authority to enter into this Assignment Agreement and any agreement or instrument referred to or contemplated by this Assignment Agreement;


(c)

it has the requisite power, authority and capacity to own and use all of its respective business assets and to carry on its respective business as presently conducted by it and to fulfill its respective obligations under this Assignment Agreement;


(d)

the execution and delivery of this Assignment Agreement and the agreements contemplated hereby have been duly authorized by all necessary action, corporate or otherwise, on its respective part;


(e)

the Option is valid, subsisting and in good standing and the Assignor is not in default or breach of the Option and, to the knowledge of the Assignor, no proceeding is pending or threatened to revoke the Option;


(f)

the Debt and the Option are owned beneficially by the Assignor with good and marketable title thereto, free and clear of all encumbrances;


(g)

there are no other consents, approvals or conditions precedent to the performance of this Assignment Agreement which have not been obtained;


(h)

this Assignment Agreement constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of it enforceable against it in accordance with its terms, except as enforcement may be limited by laws of general application affecting the rights of creditors;


(i)

no proceedings are pending for, and it is unaware of, any basis for the institution of any proceedings leading to its respective dissolution or winding up, or the placing of it in bankruptcy or subject to any other laws governing the affairs of insolvent companies or persons;


(j)

the making of this Assignment Agreement and the completion of the transactions contemplated hereby and the performance of and compliance with the terms hereof does not and will not:


(i)

conflict with or result in a breach of or violate any of the terms, conditions or provisions of its respective constating documents;


(ii)

conflict with or result in a breach of or violate any of the terms, conditions or provisions of any law, judgment, order, injunction, decree, regulation or ruling of any Court or governmental authority, domestic or foreign, to which it is subject, or constitute or result in a default under any agreement, contract or commitment to which it is a party;


(iii)

give to any party the right of termination, cancellation or acceleration in or with respect to any agreement, contract or commitment to which it is a party;


(iv)

give to any government or governmental authority, or any municipality or any subdivision thereof, including any governmental department, commission, bureau, board or administration agency, any right of termination, cancellation or suspension of, or constitute a breach of or result in a default under, any permit, license, control or authority issued to it which is necessary or desirable in connection with the conduct and operations of its respective business and the ownership or leasing of its respective business assets; or


(v)

constitute a default by it, or any event which, with the giving of notice or lapse of time or both, might constitute an event of default, under any agreement, contract, indenture or other instrument relating to any indebtedness of it which would give any party to that agreement, contract, indenture or other instrument the right to accelerate the maturity for the payment of any amount payable under that agreement, contract, indenture or other instrument; and


(k)

neither this Assignment Agreement nor any other document, certificate or statement furnished to the Assignee by or on behalf of the Assignor in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby knowingly or negligently contains any untrue or incomplete statement of material fact or omits to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements therein not misleading which would likely affect the decision of the Assignee to enter into this Assignment Agreement.


3.2

Representations, Warranties and Covenants by the Assignor respecting the Purchase Price Common Shares .   In order to induce the Assignee to enter into and consummate this Agreement, the Assignor hereby represents to, warrants to and covenants with the Assignee, with the intent that the Assignee will also rely thereon in entering into this Agreement and in concluding the transactions contemplated herein, that, to the best of the knowledge, information and belief of the Assignor, after having made due inquiry:


(a)

the Assignor acknowledges that the Purchase Price Common Shares will be issued under certain exemptions from the registration and prospectus filing requirements otherwise applicable under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and that, as a result, the Assignor may be restricted from using most of the remedies that would otherwise be available to the Assignor, the Assignor will not receive information that would otherwise be required to be provided to the Assignor and the Assignee is relieved from certain obligations that would otherwise apply to the Assignee, in either case, under applicable securities legislation;


(b)

the Assignor has not received, nor has the Assignor requested nor does the Assignor require to receive, any offering memorandum or a similar document describing the business and affairs of the Assignee in order to assist the Assignor in entering into this Assignment Agreement and in consummating the transactions contemplated herein;


(c)

the Assignor acknowledges and agrees that the Purchase Price Common Shares have not been and will not be qualified or registered under the securities laws of the United States or any other jurisdiction and, as such, the Assignor may be restricted from selling or transferring such Purchase Price Common Shares under applicable law;


3.3

Survival of the Representations, Warranties and Covenants by the Assignor .   To the extent they have not been fully performed at or prior to the time of Closing, each representation and warranty of the Assignor contained in this Assignment Agreement or in any document, instrument, certificate or undertaking given pursuant hereto shall:


(a)

be true and correct on and as of the Closing Date (as hereinafter defined) with the same force and effect as though made or given on the Closing Date;


(b)

remain in full force an effect notwithstanding any investigations conducted by or on behalf of the Assignee, and


(c)

survive the completion of the transactions contemplated by this Assignment Agreement until the second anniversary of the Closing Date (as hereinafter defined) and shall continue in full force and effect for the benefit of the Assignee during that period, except that a claim for any breach of any of the representations and warranties contained in this Assignment Agreement or in any agreement, instrument, certificate or other document executed or delivered pursuant hereto involving fraud or fraudulent misrepresentation may be made at any time following the Closing Date, subject only to applicable limitation periods imposed by law.



Article 4

WARRANTIES, REPRESENTATIONS AND COVENANTS BY THE ASSIGNEE


4.1

Warranties, Representations and Covenants by the Assignee .   In order to induce the Assignor to enter into and consummate this Assignment Agreement, the Assignee hereby warrants to, represents to and covenants with the Assignor, with the intent that the Assignor will rely thereon in entering into this Assignment Agreement and in concluding the transactions contemplated herein, that, to the best of the knowledge, information and belief of the Assignee, after having made due inquiry:


Corporate Status of the Assignee


(a)

the Assignee is a company with limited liability duly and properly incorporated, organized and validly subsisting under the laws of the State of Nevada being the only jurisdiction where it is required to be registered for the purpose of enabling it to carry on its business and own its property as presently carried on and owned;


(b)

the Assignee has good and sufficient power, authority and right to own or lease its property, to enter into this Assignment Agreement and to perform its obligations hereunder;


Authorization


(c)

this Agreement has been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the Assignee and is a legal, valid and binding obligation of the Assignee, enforceable against the Assignee, as the case may be, by the Assignor in accordance with its terms, except as enforcement may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency and other laws affecting the rights of creditors generally and except that equitable remedies may be granted only in the discretion of a court of competent jurisdiction;


Share Capital


(d)

the authorized capital of the Assignee consists of 150,000,000 shares of common stock of which 39,547,000 shares of common stock of the Assignee have been duly issued and are outstanding as fully paid and non-assessable, and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock of which no shares of preferred stock are issued and outstanding;


(e)

all of the issued and outstanding shares of the Assignee are listed and posted for trading on the NASD Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (the “OTCBB”);


(f)

the Assignee will allot and issue the Purchase Price Common Shares on the Closing Date as fully paid and non-assessable in the capital of the Assignee, free and clear of all actual or threatened liens, charges, security interests, options, encumbrances, voting agreements, voting trusts, demands, limitations and restrictions of any nature whatsoever, other than hold periods or other restrictions imposed under applicable securities legislation or by securities regulatory authorities;


Options


(g)

no person has any agreement or option or any right or privilege (whether by law, pre-emptive or contractual) capable of becoming an agreement, including convertible securities, warrants or convertible obligations of any nature, for the purchase, subscription, allotment or issuance of any unissued shares or other securities of the Assignee;


No Subsidiaries


(g)

except for the transactions contemplated in this Assignment Agreement, the Assignee does not own and does not have any agreements of any nature to acquire, directly or indirectly, any shares in the capital of or other securities, equity or proprietary interests in any person, and the Assignee does not have any agreements to acquire or lease any other business, property, assets or operations;


No Violation


(i)

the execution and delivery of this Assignment Agreement by the Assignee and the consummation of the transactions herein provided for will not result in:


(i)

the breach or violation of any of the provisions of, or constitute a default under, or conflict with or cause the acceleration of any obligation of the Assignee under:


(A)

any contract to which the Assignee is a party or by which it is bound;


(B)

any provision of the constating documents or by-laws or resolutions of the board of directors (or any committee thereof) of the Assignee;


(C)

any judgment, decree, order or award of any court, governmental body or arbitrator having jurisdiction over the Assignee;


(D)

any licence, permit, approval consent or authorization held by the Assignee which is necessary to the operation of the Assignee’s business; or


(E)

any applicable law, statute, ordinance, regulation or rule;


Financial Statements


(j)

the Assignee’s financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applied on a basis consistent with prior periods, are correct and complete and present fairly the assets, liabilities (whether accrued, absolute, contingent or otherwise) and financial condition of the Assignee as at the respective dates of and for the respective periods covered by the Assignee’s financial statements;


(k)

for any period up to the time of Closing the Assignee will not have any debts or liabilities whatsoever (whether accrued, absolute or contingent or otherwise), including any liabilities for federal, state, sales, income, corporate or any other taxes of the Assignee except for;


(i)

the debts and liabilities disclosed on, provided for or included in the balance sheet forming a part of the most recent of the Assignee’s financial statements;


(ii)

debts or liabilities disclosed in this Assignment Agreement or any Schedule hereto; and


(iii)

liabilities incurred by the Assignee in the ordinary course of the Assignee’s business subsequent to the date of the balance sheet referred to in subparagraph (k)(i) above;


Tax Matters


(l)

the Assignee has duly and timely filed all returns, elections and designations required to be filed by it with any taxation authority or if not filed on a timely basis, all fees, penalties, interest and other amounts payable as a result thereof have been paid and no such returns, elections or designations contain any misstatement or omit any statements that should have been included and each return, election and designation, including accompanying schedules and statements is true, correct and complete;


(m)

the Assignee has paid in full all amounts (including but not limited to sales, use and consumption taxes and taxes measured on income and all instalments of taxes) owing to all federal, state, territorial and municipal taxation authorities due and payable by it up to the date hereof;


(n)

adequate provision has been made by the Assignee for taxes payable for the current period for which tax returns are not yet required to be filed;


(o)

there are no agreements, waivers or other arrangements providing for any extension of time with respect to the filing of any tax return by the Assignee; or with respect to the payment of any tax or any governmental charge, penalty, interest or fine by the Assignee; or with respect to the issuance of any tax assessment or reassessment;


(p)

there are no actions, suits, proceedings, investigations or claims now threatened by any governmental authority or pending against the Assignee as initiated by any governmental authority in respect of any amounts, including but not limited to taxes, governmental charges or assessments;


(q)

there are no matters under discussion with any governmental authority relating to any amounts, including but not limited to taxes, governmental charges or assessments asserted or to be asserted by such authority;


(r)

the Assignee is not aware of any circumstances that might result in any threatened, proposed or actual assessment or reassessment against the Assignee;


Dividends and Distributions


(s)

since the date of incorporation, the Assignee has not:


(i)

declared or paid any dividends;


(ii)

declared or made any other distributions on any of its issued shares, except for the recent forward stock split on a basis of 11.14 new shares for each one (1) old share, which was effective June 6, 2005; or


(iii)

directly or indirectly, redeemed, purchased or otherwise acquired any of its issued shares or agreed, or is obligated, so to do;


Legal Proceedings


(t)

there are no actions, suits, proceedings or outstanding claims or demands instituted before any federal, state, municipal or other governmental department, court, commission, board, bureau, agency or instrumentality, domestic or foreign, or by or before an arbitrator or arbitration board or pending or threatened against or affecting the Assignee or its property or the Assignee’s business, nor is there any basis for any such action, suit, proceeding or claim;


(u)

there are no orders, decrees, injunctions or judgments of any court or of any federal, provincial, territorial or municipal department, agency, commission, board, bureau or instrumentality, domestic or foreign, instituted, pending, threatened or obtained against or affecting the Assignee or its property or the Assignee’s business; nor is there any basis for any such order, decree, injunction or judgment;


(v)

there is no legal impediment to the continued operation, in the ordinary course, of the property and the Assignee’s business;


(w)

the Assignee has not violated nor is it violating any federal, state, territorial or municipal statute, regulation, ordinance, rule or order applicable to the Assignee’s business or to any of its property or its ownership thereof;


(x)

the Assignee has complied with all applicable federal, state, territorial and municipal statutes, regulations, ordinances, rules and orders;


Directors and Officers


(y)

the present directors and officers of the Assignee are as follows:


Name

Position


Michael Iverson

President, Secretary, Treasurer and

Director

Luis Goyzueta

Director


Full Disclosure


(z)

the Assignee has no information or knowledge of any fact not communicated to the Assignor and relating to the Assignee or to the Assignee’s business or to its issued and outstanding securities which, if known to the Assignor, might reasonably be expected to deter the Assignor from entering into this Assignment Agreement or from completing the transactions contemplated by this Assignment Agreement.


4.2

Survival of the Representations, Warranties and Covenants by the Assignee .   To the extent they have not been fully performed at or prior to the time of Closing, each representation and warranty of the Assignee contained in this Assignment Agreement or in any document, instrument, certificate or undertaking given pursuant hereto shall:


(a)

be true and correct on and as of the Closing Date (as hereinafter defined) with the same force and effect as though made or given on the Closing Date;


(b)

remain in full force an effect notwithstanding any investigations conducted by or on behalf of the Assignor, and


(c)

survive the completion of the transactions contemplated by this Assignment Agreement until the second anniversary of the Closing Date (as hereinafter defined) and shall continue in full force and effect for the benefit of the Assignor during that period, except that a claim for any breach of any of the representations and warranties contained in this Assignment Agreement or in any agreement, instrument, certificate or other document executed or delivered pursuant hereto involving fraud or fraudulent misrepresentation may be made at any time following the Closing Date, subject only to applicable limitation periods imposed by law.



Article 5

CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO CLOSING


5.1

The Assignor’s Conditions Precedent .   The assignment and transfer of the Option to the Assignee is subject to the following terms and conditions for the exclusive benefit of the Assignor, to be fulfilled or performed at or prior to the Closing Date (as herein after defined):


(a)

the representations and warranties of the Assignee contained in this Assignment Agreement shall be true and correct [in all material respects] at the Closing Date, with the same force and effect as if such representations and warranties were made at and as of such time;


(b)

all of the terms, covenants and conditions of this Assignment Agreement to be complied with or performed by the Assignee at or before the Closing Date shall have been complied with or performed;


(c)

no legal action or proceeding shall be pending or threatened by any person to enjoin, restrict or prohibit the assignment and transfer of the Option contemplated hereby.


If any of the conditions contained in this section 5.1 shall not be performed or fulfilled at or prior to the Closing Date to the satisfaction of the Assignor, acting reasonably, the Assignor may, by notice to the Assignee, terminate this Assignment Agreement and the obligations of the Assignor under this Assignment Agreement shall be terminated.  Any such condition may be waived in whole or in part by the Assignor in writing without prejudice to any claims it may have for breach of covenant, representation or warranty.


5.2

Assignee’s Conditions Precedent .   The assignment and transfer of the Option from the Assignor to the Assignee is subject to the following terms and conditions for the exclusive benefit of the Assignee, to be fulfilled or performed at or prior to the Closing Date (as hereinafter defined):


(a)

the representations and warranties of the Assignor contained in this Assignment Agreement shall be true and correct at the Closing Date, with the same force and effect as if such representations and warranties were made at and as of such time;


(b)

all of the terms, covenants and conditions of this Assignment Agreement to be complied with or performed by the Assignor at or before the Closing Date shall have been complied with or performed;


(c)

no legal action or proceeding shall be pending or threatened by any person to enjoin, restrict or prohibit the assignment and transfer of the Option contemplated hereby; and


(d)

United Energy Metals S.A. shall have executed the acknowledgement attached hereto as Schedule “A”, which confirms that all of the representations, warranties and covenants of United Energy Metals S.A. made in the Option Agreement are true and correct at and as of the Closing Date of this Assignment Agreement.


If any of the conditions contained in this section 5.2 shall not be performed or fulfilled at or prior to the Closing Date to the satisfaction of the Assignee, acting reasonably, the Assignee may, by notice to the Assignor, terminate this Assignment Agreement and the obligations of the Assignee under this Assignment Agreement shall be terminated.  Any such condition may be waived in whole or in part by the Assignee in writing without prejudice to any claims it may have for breach of covenant, representation or warranty.



Article 6

CLOSING AND EVENTS OF CLOSING


6.1

Closing and Closing Date .   The closing (the “ Closing ”) of the within assignment and transfer of the Debt and the Option as contemplated in the manner as set forth in Article “2” hereinabove, together with all of the transactions contemplated by this Assignment Agreement and the satisfaction of all of the conditions precedent which are set out in Article “5” hereinabove, shall occur on the later of November 1, 2005, and the date that the Assignee becomes registered as a foreign company in Argentina (the “ Closing Date ”), or on such earlier or later Closing Date as may be agreed to in advance and in writing by each of the Parties hereto, and will be closed at the offices of the Assignee’s counsel, Devlin Jensen, located at 2550 – 555 W. Hastings St., Vancouver, B.C., Canada  V6B 4N5 at 10:00 a.m. (Pacific time) on the Closing Date.


6.2

Latest Closing Date .   If the Closing Date has not occurred by December 15, 2005, subject to an extension as may be mutually agreed to by the Parties for a maximum of 14 days per extension, then the Assignee and the Assignor shall each have the option to terminate this Assignment Agreement by delivery of written notice to the other Party.  Upon delivery of such notice, this Assignment Agreement shall cease to be of any force and effect except for Section 12 hereinbelow, which shall remain in full force and effect notwithstanding the termination of this Agreement.


6.3

Documents to be delivered by the Assignor no later than the Closing Date .   No later than the Closing Date, and in addition to the documentation which is required by the agreements and conditions precedent which are set forth hereinabove, the Assignor shall also execute and deliver or cause to be delivered to the Assignee all such other documents, resolutions and instruments as may be necessary to complete all of the transactions contemplated by this Assignment Agreement and including, without limitation, the necessary assignment and transfer of the Debt and the Option to the Assignee free and clear of all liens, security interests, charges and encumbrances, and in particular including, but not being limited to, the following materials:


(a)

a certified copy of the resolutions of the directors, and shareholders if necessary, of the Assignor authorizing the assignment and transfer of the Debt and the Option to the Assignee;


(b)

a certificate of an officer of the Assignor, dated as of the Closing Date, certifying that the warranties, representations, covenants and agreements of the Assignor contained in this Assignment Agreement are true and correct in all respects and will be true and correct as of the Closing Date;


(c)

a certified copy of the executed Schedule “A” by the President of United Energy Metals S.A., dated as of the Closing Date, which is the acknowledgement and confirmation by United Energy Metals S.A. that all of the representations, warranties and covenants of United Energy Metals S.A. made in the Option Agreement are true and correct at and as of the Closing Date of this Assignment Agreement; and


(d)

all such other documents and instruments as the Assignee’s solicitors may reasonably require.


6.4

Documents to be delivered by the Assignee .   No later than the Closing Date, and in addition to the documentation which is required by the agreements and conditions precedent which are set forth hereinabove, the Assignee shall also execute and deliver or cause to be delivered to the Assignor, all such other documents, resolutions and instruments that may be necessary for the Assignor to complete all of the transactions contemplated by this Assignment Agreement and including, without limitation, the necessary assignment and transfer of the Debt and the Option to the Assignee free and clear of all liens, security interests, charges and encumbrances, and in particular including, but not being limited to, the following materials:


(a)

a certified copy of the resolutions of the directors of the Assignee providing for the approval of all of the transactions contemplated hereby;


(b)

an executed treasury order of the Assignee providing for the due issuance of all of the Purchase Price Common Shares to the order and direction of the Assignor in accordance with Section 2.2 hereinabove;


(c)

a certified cheque or bank draft payable to the Assignor for that part of the Purchase Price contemplated to be paid at the time of Closing to be paid in cash;


(d)

a certificate of an officer of the Assignee, dated as of the Closing Date, acceptable in form to the Assignor, or its legal counsel if applicable, acting reasonably, certifying that the warranties, representations, covenants and agreements of the Assignee contained in this Assignment Agreement are true and correct and will be true and correct as of the Closing Date as if made by the Assignee on the Closing Date; and


(e)

all such other documents and instruments as the Assignor’s solicitors may reasonably require.



Article 7

ROYALTY


7.1

The Assignee shall pay to the Assignor a 5% Net Smelter Return Royalty (“NSR”) on all uranium production, on the terms and conditions set out in Schedule “B” hereto and a 5% Net Smelter Return Royalty (“NSR”) on all other minerals, on the terms and conditions set out in Schedule “B”.  The 5% NSR royalty noted above is subject to a “buy out” provision that allows the Assignee at any time, to purchase a 2% NSR royalty for US $4,000,000 (US 4 million dollars).


7.2

Royalty payments shall be accompanied by a complete statement showing the computation of amounts due and the Assignee shall ensure that United Energy Metals S.A. shall keep full, true and accurate records, files and books of account, according to Argentina general accepted accounting principles, at its principal place of business containing all particulars that may be required for the full computation and verification of the Royalty payable to the Assignor.


7.3

The Assignor may request that an independent auditing firm verify the accuracy of the Royalty payments made by the Assignee.  The fees for such independent auditing firm shall be borne by the Assignor, unless the independent auditing firm finds a material discrepancy (5% or more) in the Royalty payments.


7.4

In the event that the Assignee fails to pay the Royalty payment set forth herein, then the Assignor shall have the right to collect the amount due, plus a non-compensatory fine equivalent to 12% (twelve percent) of the GORR outstanding amount, per year.



Article 8

INDEMNIFICATION AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS


8.1

Indemnification .   The Parties hereto agree to indemnify and save harmless the other Parties hereto and including, where applicable, their respective affiliates, directors, officers, employees and agents (each such party being an “ Indemnified Party ”) harmless from and against and agree to be liable for any and all losses, claims, actions, suits, proceedings, damages, liabilities or expenses of whatever nature or kind, including any investigation expenses incurred by any Indemnified Party, to which an Indemnified Party may become subject by reason of the terms and conditions of this Agreement.


8.2

No Indemnification .   This indemnity will not apply in respect of an Indemnified Party in the event and to the extent that a court of competent jurisdiction in a final judgment shall determine that the Indemnified Party was grossly negligent or guilty of wilful misconduct.


8.3

Claim of Indemnification .   The Parties hereto agree to waive any right they might have of first requiring the Indemnified Party to proceed against or enforce any other right, power, remedy, security or claim payment from any other person before claiming this indemnity.


8.4

Notice of Claim .   In case any action is brought against an Indemnified Party in respect of which indemnity may be sought against any of the Parties hereto, the Indemnified Party will give the relevant Party hereto prompt written notice of any such action of which the Indemnified Party has knowledge and such Party will undertake the investigation and defense thereof on behalf of the Indemnified Party, including the prompt consulting of counsel acceptable to the Indemnified Party affected and the payment of all expenses.  Failure by the Indemnified Party to so notify shall not relieve any Party hereto of such Party’s obligation of indemnification hereunder unless (and only to the extent that) such failure results in a forfeiture by any Party hereto of substantive rights or defenses.


8.5

Settlement .   No admission of liability and no settlement of any action shall be made without the consent of each of the Parties hereto and the consent of the Indemnified Party affected, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld.


8.6

Legal Proceedings .   Notwithstanding that the relevant Party hereto will undertake the investigation and defense of any action, an Indemnified Party will have the right to employ separate counsel in any such action and participate in the defense thereof, but the fees and expenses of such counsel will be at the expense of the Indemnified Party unless:


(a)

such counsel has been authorized by the relevant Party hereto;


(b)

the relevant Party hereto has not assumed the defense of the action within a reasonable period of time after receiving notice of the action;


(c)

the named parties to any such action include that any Party hereto and the Indemnified Party shall have been advised by counsel that there may be a conflict of interest between any Party hereto and the Indemnified Party; or


(d)

there are one or more legal defenses available to the Indemnified Party which are different from or in addition to those available to any Party hereto.


8.7

Contribution .   If for any reason other than the gross negligence or bad faith of the Indemnified Party being the primary cause of the loss claim, damage, liability, cost or expense, the foregoing indemnification is unavailable to the Indemnified Party or insufficient to hold them harmless, the relevant Party hereto shall contribute to the amount paid or payable by the Indemnified Party as a result of any and all such losses, claim, damages or liabilities in such proportion as is appropriate to reflect not only the relative benefits received by any Party hereto on the one hand and the Indemnified Party on the other, but also the relative fault of the Parties and other equitable considerations which may be relevant.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, the relevant Party hereto shall in any event contribute to the amount paid or payable by the Indemnified Party, as a result of the loss, claim, damage, liability, cost or expense (other than a loss, claim, damage, liability, cost or expenses, the primary cause of which is the gross negligence or bad faith of the Indemnified Party), any excess of such amount over the amount of the fees actually received by the Indemnified Party hereunder.



Article 9

NON-DISCLOSURE


9.1

Public Announcements and Disclosure to Regulatory Authorities .   All information relating to the Assignment Agreement and the transaction contemplated therein shall be treated as confidential and no public disclosure shall be made by any Party without the prior approval of the Assignor and the Assignee.  Notwithstanding the provisions of this Article, the Parties hereto agree to make such public announcements and disclosure to the Regulatory Authorities of this Assignment Agreement promptly upon its execution all in accordance with the requirements of applicable securities legislation and regulations.



Article 10

TRANSFERS


10.1

Transfer of Interest in the Option .   After the Closing, the Assignee may sell, assign, transfer or dispose of its interest in the Option without restriction from the Assignor, provided that the third party acquiring such Assignee’s interest shall irrevocably and expressly assume the obligation to (i) make the Royalty payments to the Assignor, and (ii) perform any and all obligations contemplated in this Assignment Agreement that shall survive its termination or the Closing.



Article 11

ASSIGNMENT


11.1

Assignment .   Save and except as provided herein, no Party hereto may sell, assign, pledge or mortgage or otherwise encumber all or any part of its respective interest herein without the prior written consent of the other Party hereto, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld.



Article 12

FORCE MAJEURE


12.1

Events .   If any Party hereto is at any time prevented or delayed in complying with any provisions of this Agreement by reason of strikes, walk-outs, labour shortages, power shortages, fires, wars, acts of God, earthquakes, storms, floods, explosions, accidents, protests or demonstrations by environmental lobbyists or native rights groups, delays in transportation, breakdown of machinery, inability to obtain necessary materials in the open market, unavailability of equipment, governmental regulations restricting normal operations, shipping delays or any other reason or reasons beyond the control of that Party, then the time limited for the performance by that Party of its respective obligations hereunder shall be extended by a period of time equal in length to the period of each such prevention or delay.


12.2

Notice .   A Party shall, within seven calendar days, give notice to the other Party of each event of force majeure under subsection 12.1 hereinabove, and upon cessation of such event shall furnish the other Party with notice of that event together with particulars of the number of days by which the obligations of that Party hereunder have been extended by virtue of such event of force majeure and all preceding events of force majeure .



Article 13

NOTICE


13.1

Notice .   Each notice, demand or other communication required or permitted to be given under this Assignment Agreement shall be in writing and shall be sent by prepaid registered mail deposited in a post office addressed to the Party entitled to receive the same, or delivered to such Party, at the address for such Party specified above.  The date of receipt of such notice, demand or other communication shall be the date of delivery thereof if delivered, or, if given by registered mail as aforesaid, shall be deemed conclusively to be the third calendar day after the same shall have been so mailed, except in the case of interruption of postal services for any reason whatsoever, in which case the date of receipt shall be the date on which the notice, demand or other communication is actually received by the addressee.


13.2

Change of Address .   Either Party may at any time and from time to time notify the other Party in writing of a change of address and the new address to which notice shall be given to it thereafter until further change.





3





Article 14

GENERAL PROVISIONS


14.1

Entire Agreement .   This Assignment Agreement constitutes the entire agreement to date between the Parties hereto and supersedes every previous agreement, communication, expectation, negotiation, representation or understanding, whether oral or written, express or implied, statutory or otherwise, between the Parties with respect to the subject matter of this Assignment Agreement.


14.2

Enurement .   This Assignment Agreement will enure to the benefit of and will be binding upon the Parties hereto, their respective heirs, executors, administrators and assigns.


14.3

Schedules .   The Schedules to this Assignment Agreement are hereby incorporated by reference into this Assignment Agreement in its entirety.


14.4

Time of the Essence .   Time will be of the essence of this Assignment Agreement.


14.5

Applicable Law .   The situs of this Assignment Agreement is Reno, Nevada, and for all purposes this Assignment Agreement will be governed exclusively by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws and Courts prevailing in the State of Nevada.


14.6

Further Assurances .   The Parties hereto hereby, jointly and severally, covenant and agree to forthwith, upon request, execute and deliver, or cause to be executed and delivered, such further and other deeds, documents, assurances and instructions as may be required by the Parties hereto in order to carry out the true nature and intent of this Assignment Agreement.


14.7

Severability and Construction .   Each Article, section, paragraph, term and provision of this Assignment Agreement, and any portion thereof, shall be considered severable, and if, for any reason, any portion of this Assignment Agreement is determined to be invalid, contrary to or in conflict with any applicable present or future law, rule or regulation in a final unappealable ruling issued by any court, agency or tribunal with valid jurisdiction in a proceeding to any of the Parties hereto is a party, that ruling shall not impair the operation of, or have any other effect upon, such other portions of this Assignment Agreement as may remain otherwise intelligible (all of which shall remain binding on the Parties and continue to be given full force and agreement as of the date upon which the ruling becomes final).


14.8

Captions .   The captions, section numbers, Article numbers and Schedule numbers appearing in this Assignment Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall in no way define, limit, construe or describe the scope or intent of this Assignment Agreement nor in any way affect this Assignment Agreement.


14.9

Currency .   Unless otherwise stipulated, all references to money amounts herein shall be in lawful money of the United States.


14.10

Counterparts .   This Assignment Agreement may be signed by the Parties hereto in as many counterparts as may be necessary, and via facsimile if necessary, each of which so signed being deemed to be an original and such counterparts together constituting one and the same instrument and, notwithstanding the date of execution, being deemed to bear the effective Execution Date as set forth on the front page of this Assignment Agreement.


14.11

No Partnership or Agency .   The Parties hereto have not created a partnership and nothing contained in this Assignment Agreement shall in any manner whatsoever constitute any Party the partner, agent or legal representative of any other Party, nor create any fiduciary relationship between them for any purpose whatsoever.  No Party shall have any authority to act for, or to assume any obligations or responsibility on behalf of, any other party except as may be, from time to time, agreed upon in writing between the Parties or as otherwise expressly provided.


14.12

Consents and Waivers .   No consent or waiver expressed or implied by either Party hereto in respect of any breach or default by any other Party in the performance by such other of its obligations hereunder shall:


(a)

be valid unless it is in writing and stated to be a consent or waiver pursuant to this section;


(b)

be relied upon as a consent to or waiver of any other breach or default of the same or any other obligation;


(c)

constitute a general waiver under this Assignment Agreement; or


(d)

eliminate or modify the need for a specific consent or waiver pursuant to this section in any other or subsequent instance.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF each of the Parties hereto has hereunto set its seal by the hand of its duly authorized signatory as of the Execution Date as set forth on the front page of this Assignment Agreement.



INTERNATIONAL MINERAL RESOURCES LTD.



Per:

/s/ T. Barry Dempsey


Authorized Signatory


T. Barry Dempsey for: Cockburn Directors, Ltd.

Authorized representative for

International Mineral Resources Ltd.


(print name and title)



LAKEFIELD VENTURES, INC.



Per:

/s/ Luis Goyzueta


Authorized Signatory


Luis Goyzueta, Director


(print name and title)




SCHEDULE “A”


This is Schedule “A” to that certain Assignment Agreement among International Mineral Resources Ltd. and Lakefield Ventures, Inc., dated September 22, 2005




OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE OF UNITED ENERGY METALS S.A.




I, JULIO CÉSAR PULISICH , the President and a Director of UNITED ENERGY METALS S.A. (the “ Company ”), do hereby certify that the representations, warranties and covenants of the Company provided in the Option Agreement entered into between the Company and International Mineral Resources Ltd., dated September 21, 2005 are true and correct at and as of the Closing Date of this Assignment Agreement.



WITNESS my hand at Ciudad Mendoza, Mendoza, Argentina, on this

 day of

, 2005.




 /s/ Julio Pulisich

Julio César Pulisich

President and a Director

__________





4





SCHEDULE “B”


This is Schedule “B” to that certain Assignment Agreement among International Mineral Resources Ltd. and Lakefield Ventures, Inc., dated September 22, 2005




1.

For the purposes of this Agreement, the term “Net Smelter Returns” shall mean the net proceeds actually paid to the Company from the sale by the Company of minerals mined and removed from the Property, after deduction of the following:

(a)

smelting costs, treatment charges and penalties including, but not being limited to, metal losses, penalties for impurities and charges for refining, selling and handling by the smelter, refinery or other purchaser; provided, however, in the case of leaching operations or other solution mining or beneficiation techniques, where the metal being treated is precipitated or otherwise directly derived from such leach solution, all processing and recovery costs incurred by the Company, beyond the point at which the metal being treated is in solution, shall be considered as treatment charges;

(b)

costs of handling, transporting and insuring ores, minerals and other materials or concentrates from the Property or from a concentrator, whether situated on or off the Property, to a smelter, refinery or other place of treatment; and

(c)

ad valorem taxes and taxes based upon production, but not income taxes.

In the event the Company commingles minerals from the Property with minerals from other properties, the Company shall establish procedures, in accordance with sound mining and metallurgical techniques, for determining the proportional amount of the total recoverable metal content in the commingled minerals attributable to the input from each of the properties by calculating the same on a metallurgical basis, in accordance with sampling schedules and mining efficiency experience, so that production royalties applicable to minerals produced from the Property may reasonably be determined.






OPTION AGREEMENT


THIS AGREEMENT is made effective as of September 21, 2005 (the “Effective Date”).


BETWEEN:


UNITED ENERGY METALS S.A. , a corporation incorporated pursuant to the laws of Argentina and having an office address located at 1052 San Martín Avenue, 3rd floor, Office 17, Ciudad Mendoza, Province of Mendoza, Argentina;

(the “Optionor”)


AND:


INTERNATIONAL MINERAL RESOURCES LTD. , a corporation being organized pursuant to the laws of the Turks and Caicos Islands and having an office address located at No. 1 Caribbean Place, P.O. Box 97, Leeward Highway, Providenciales, Turks and Caicos Islands;

(the “Optionee”)


WHEREAS:


(A)

The Optionor is in the business of acquiring, exploring and developing mineral properties in Argentina (the “Business”)


(B)

The Optionor is the legal and beneficial owner of certain permits and applications for uranium exploration and exploitation in the Province of Chubut, Argentina, which permits and cateos are more particularly described in Schedule A attached hereto;


(C)

The Optionor acknowledges that it is indebted to the Optionee in the amount of US$70,300 (the “Debt”);


(D)

The Optionor desires to grant the Optionee with an option (the “Option”) whereby the Optionee can pay US$70,300 to the Optionor or convert the Debt in order to acquire 499 shares of the Optionor (also called “Minera Argentina” or “UEM”) in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement so that upon exercise of the Option, the Optionee will own 99.8% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Optionor, and, if the Optionee decides to convert the Debt, then the Debt will be extinguished.



NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSES that in consideration of the $10.00 now paid by the Optionee to the Optionor and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereto agree as follows:



1.

Definitions


1.1

In this Agreement, the following expressions shall, where the context so admits, bear the meaning respectively set opposite them:


(a)

Agreement ” means this Agreement, as the same may be amended, supplemented or modified from time to time.


(b)

Material Contracts ” means those contracts described in Schedule E.


(c)

Parties ” means the parties to this Agreement, which are the Optionor and the Optionee.


(d)

Property ” Those permits and cateos for uranium exploration and exploitation in the province of Chubut, Argentina, which permits and cateos are more particularly described in Schedule A together with all mining leases and all other mining interests derived from any such claims.



2.

Schedules


The following schedules are attached to and incorporated in this Agreement by reference and deemed to be part of this Agreement:


Schedule A

Description of Mineral Titles

Schedule B

Bank Accounts and Authorized Signatories

Schedule C

Constating Documents

Schedule D

Financial Statements of the Optionor

Schedule E

Material Contracts

Schedule F

Permits

Schedule G

Exercise Notice


3.

Option to Acquire Shares in Optionor


3.1

The Optionor, subject to the terms hereof and based on the representations and warranties contained herein, hereby grants to the Optionee the option (the “Option”) to acquire 499 shares of common stock of the Optionor (the “Option Shares”), which Option Shares shall upon issuance be fully paid and non-assessable and free from any and all liens and encumbrances, in exchange for either the Optionee paying to the Optionor US$70,300, or extinguishing the Debt owing from the Optionor to the Optionee.


3.2

The Parties acknowledge that if the Optionee decides to convert the Debt, then the exercise of the Option by the Optionee will extinguish the Debt owing from the Optionor to the Optionee.


3.3

The Parties acknowledge that the 499 Option Shares when issued to the Optionee upon exercise of the Option will represent 99.8% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of the Optionor.  


3.4

The Optionee may exercise the Option to acquire the Option Shares at any time up to the later of: (i) the time during which the Debt remains outstanding, or (ii) September __, 2010, or (iii) until such time as agreed to by the Parties in writing (the “Option Period”).  To exercise the Option to purchase, the Optionee shall tender to the Optionor a notice of exercise of the Option (the “Exercise Notice”) at the address of the Optionor listed above.


3.5

Upon receipt of the Exercise Notice by the Optionor, the Optionor shall deliver to the Optionee a share certificate or share certificates representing the Option Shares acquired, within ten business days of receiving the Exercise Notice, which is attached hereto as Schedule G.

3.6

The Optionee hereby acknowledges and agrees that the Option Shares shall be subject to any applicable resale or other restriction affecting the transfer of the Option Shares under the applicable securities laws of Argentina.


4.

Representations, Warranties and Covenants by the Optionor


4.1

General Representations, Warranties and Covenants by the Optionor .   In order to induce the Optionee to enter into and consummate this Agreement, the Optionor represents to, warrants to and covenants with the Optionee, with the intent that the Optionee will rely thereon in entering into this Agreement and in concluding the transactions contemplated herein, that, to the best of the knowledge, information and belief of the Optionor, after having made due inquiry:


(a)

it is duly organized under the laws of its respective jurisdiction of incorporation and is validly existing and in good standing with respect to all statutory filings required by the applicable corporate laws;


(b)

it is qualified to do business in those jurisdictions where it is necessary to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement and it has the full power and authority to enter into this Agreement and any agreement or instrument referred to or contemplated by this Agreement;


(c)

it has the requisite power, authority and capacity to own and use all of its respective business assets and to carry on its respective business as presently conducted by it and to fulfill its respective obligations under this Agreement;


(d)

the execution and delivery of this Agreement and the agreements contemplated hereby have been duly authorized by all necessary action, corporate or otherwise, on its respective part;


(e)

there are no other consents, approvals or conditions precedent to the performance of this Agreement which have not been obtained;


(f)

this Agreement constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of it enforceable against it in accordance with its terms, except as enforcement may be limited by laws of general application affecting the rights of creditors;


(g)

no proceedings are pending for, and it is unaware of, any basis for the institution of any proceedings leading to its respective dissolution or winding up, or the placing of it in bankruptcy or subject to any other laws governing the affairs of insolvent companies or persons;


(h)

the making of this Agreement and the completion of the transactions contemplated hereby and the performance of and compliance with the terms hereof does not and will not:


(i)

conflict with or result in a breach of or violate any of the terms, conditions or provisions of its respective constating documents;


(ii)

conflict with or result in a breach of or violate any of the terms, conditions or provisions of any law, judgment, order, injunction, decree, regulation or ruling of any Court or governmental authority, domestic or foreign, to which it is subject, or constitute or result in a default under any agreement, contract or commitment to which it is a party;


(iii)

give to any party the right of termination, cancellation or acceleration in or with respect to any agreement, contract or commitment to which it is a party;


(iv)

give to any government or governmental authority, or any municipality or any subdivision thereof, including any governmental department, commission, bureau, board or administration agency, any right of termination, cancellation or suspension of, or constitute a breach of or result in a default under, any permit, license, control or authority issued to it which is necessary or desirable in connection with the conduct and operations of its respective business and the ownership or leasing of its respective business assets; or


(v)

constitute a default by it, or any event which, with the giving of notice or lapse of time or both, might constitute an event of default, under any agreement, contract, indenture or other instrument relating to any indebtedness of it which would give any party to that agreement, contract, indenture or other instrument the right to accelerate the maturity for the payment of any amount payable under that agreement, contract, indenture or other instrument; and


(i)

neither this Agreement nor any other document, certificate or statement furnished to the Optionee by or on behalf of the Optionor in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby knowingly or negligently contains any untrue or incomplete statement of material fact or omits to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements therein not misleading which would likely affect the decision of the Optionee to enter into this Agreement.


4.2

Representations, Warranties and Covenants by the Optionor respecting the Option Shares .   In order to induce the Optionee to enter into and consummate this Agreement, the Optionor hereby represents to, warrants to and covenants with the Optionee, with the intent that the Optionee will also rely thereon in entering into this Agreement and in concluding the transactions contemplated herein, that, to the best of the knowledge, information and belief of the Optionor, after having made due inquiry:


(a)

the Option Shares when issued from the Optionor’s treasury upon exercise of the Option by the Optionee will be fully paid and non-assessable and will be free and clear of liens, charges, encumbrances, pledges, mortgages, hypothecations, security interests and adverse claims of any and all nature whatsoever and including, without limitation, options, pre-emptive rights and other rights of acquisition in favour of any person, whether conditional or absolute;


(b)

the Optionor has the power and capacity to issue the Option Shares, and the Option Shares will not be subject to any voting or similar arrangement;


(c)

there are no actions, suits, proceedings or investigations (whether or not purportedly against or on behalf of the Optionor), pending or threatened, which may affect, without limitation, the rights of the Optionor to issue the Option Shares to the Optionee at law or in equity, or before or by any federal, state, provincial, municipal or other governmental department, commission, board, bureau, agency or instrumentality, domestic or foreign, and, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, there are no claims or potential claims under any relevant family relations legislation or other equivalent legislation affecting the issuance of the Option Shares.  In addition, the Optionor is not now aware of any existing ground on which any such action, suit or proceeding might be commenced with any reasonable likelihood of success;


(d)

no other person, firm or corporation has any agreement, option or right capable of becoming an agreement for the purchase of any of the Option Shares;


(e)

the Optionor is resident in the jurisdiction as set forth under the Optionor’s address listed above, and that all negotiations and other acts in furtherance of the execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Optionor in connection with the transactions contemplated herein have taken place and will take place solely in such jurisdiction;


(f)

the Option Shares if and when issued will be issued in accordance with all applicable securities and corporate legislation and policies; and


(g)

the Optionor is not aware of any fact or circumstance which has not been disclosed to the Optionee which should be disclosed in order to prevent the representations and warranties contained in this section from being misleading or which would likely affect the decision of the Optionee to enter into this Agreement.


4.3

Representations, Warranties and Covenants by the Optionor respecting the Optionor .   In order to induce the Optionee to enter into and consummate this Agreement, the Optionor hereby represents to, warrants to and covenants with the Optionee, with the intent that the Optionee will also rely thereon in entering into this Agreement and in concluding the transactions contemplated herein, that, to the best of the knowledge, information and belief of the Optionor, after having made due inquiry:






Corporate Status of the Optionor


(a)

the Optionor is a company with limited liability duly and properly organized and validly subsisting under the laws of Argentina being the only jurisdiction where it is required to be registered for the purpose of enabling it to carry on its business and own its property as presently carried on and owned;


(b)

the Optionor has good and sufficient power, authority and right to own or lease its property, to enter into this Agreement and to perform its obligations hereunder;


Authorization


(c)

this Agreement has been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the Optionee and is a legal, valid and binding obligation of the Optionor, enforceable against the Optionor, as the case may be, by the Optionee in accordance with its terms, except as enforcement may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency and other laws affecting the rights of creditors generally and except that equitable remedies may be granted only in the discretion of a court of competent jurisdiction;


No Other Agreements to Purchase


(d)

no person other than the Optionee has any written or oral agreement or option or any right or privilege (whether by law, pre-emptive or contractual) capable of becoming an agreement, or option for the purchase or acquisition from the Optionor of any of the Option Shares;


Share Capital


(e)

the authorized capital of the Optionor consists of 500 common shares with a par value of 100 Argentinean pesos, of which one (1) common share is outstanding and fully paid and non-assessable, and no preferred shares;


Options


(f)

no person has any agreement or option or any right or privilege (whether by law, pre-emptive or contractual) capable of becoming an agreement, including convertible securities, warrants or convertible obligations of any nature, for the purchase, subscription, allotment or issuance of any unissued shares or other securities of the Optionor;


Title to Shares


(g)

upon exercise of the Option and completion of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, all of the Option Shares will be owned by the Optionee as the beneficial owner of record, with good and marketable title thereto (except for such encumbrances as may have been granted by the Optionee);


No Subsidiaries


(h)

the Optionor does not own and does not have any agreements of any nature to acquire, directly or indirectly, any shares in the capital of or other securities, equity or proprietary interests in any person, and the Optionor does not have any agreements to acquire or lease any other business, property, assets or operations;


Business of the Optionor


(i)

the Optionor’s Business, is and will be the only business presently carried on by the Optionor as set forth in the Recitals to this Agreement, and the property and assets of the Optionor are sufficient to carry on the Optionor’s Business;


Location of Property and Assets


(j)

all of the property and assets of the Optionor are situated at one of the locations set out in Schedule A;


Title to Personal Property and Other Property


(k)

the property and assets of the Optionor are and will be owned beneficially by the Optionor with a good and marketable title thereto, free and clear of all encumbrances save as previously disclosed to the Optionee;


Financial Statements


(l)

the Optionor’s financial statements dated September 1, 2005, have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, as applied on a basis consistent with prior periods, are correct and complete and present fairly the assets, liabilities (whether accrued, absolute, contingent or otherwise) and financial condition of the Optionor as at the respective dates of and for the respective periods covered by the Optionor’s financial statements;


(m)

the Optionor does not have any debts or liabilities whatsoever (whether accrued, absolute, contingent or otherwise), including any liabilities for federal, provincial, sales, excise, income, corporate or any other taxes of the Optionor except for:


(i)

the debts and liabilities disclosed on, provided for or included in the balance sheet forming a part of the most recent of the Optionor’s financial statements;


(ii)

debts or liabilities disclosed in this Agreement or any Schedule hereto; and


(iii)

liabilities incurred by the Optionor in the ordinary course of the Optionor’s Business subsequent to the date of the balance sheet referred to in the Optionor’s financial statements;


Books and Records


(n)

the books and records of the Optionor fairly and correctly set out and disclose, in all material respects, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, consistently applied, the financial condition of the Optionor as of the date of this Agreement and all material financial transactions of the Optionor have been accurately recorded in such books and records;


Tax Matters


(p)

the Optionor has duly and timely filed all returns, elections and designations required to be filed by it with any taxation authority or if not filed on a timely basis, all fees, penalties, interest and other amounts payable as a result thereof have been paid and no such returns, elections or designations contain any misstatement or omit any statements that should have been included and each return, election and designation, including accompanying schedules and statements is true, correct and complete;


(q)

the Optionor has paid in full all amounts (including but not limited to sales, use and consumption taxes and taxes measured on income and all instalments of taxes) owing to all federal, provincial, territorial and municipal taxation authorities due and payable by it up to the date hereof;


(r)

adequate provision has been made by the Optionor for taxes payable for the current period for which tax returns are not yet required to be filed;


(s)

there are no agreements, waivers or other arrangements providing for any extension of time with respect to the filing of any tax return by the Optionor; or with respect to the payment of any tax or any governmental charge, penalty, interest or fine by the Optionor; or with respect to the issuance of any tax assessment or reassessment;


(t)

there are no actions, suits, proceedings, investigations or claims now threatened by any governmental authority or pending against the Optionor as initiated by any governmental authority in respect of any amounts, including but not limited to taxes, governmental charges or assessments;


(u)

there are no matters under discussion with any governmental authority relating to any amounts, including but not limited to taxes, governmental charges or assessments asserted or to be asserted by such authority;


(v)

the Optionor is not aware of any circumstances that might result in any threatened, proposed or actual assessment or reassessment against the Optionor;


(w)

the Optionor has withheld and remitted all amounts required to be withheld by it (including without limitation, income tax, Pension Plan contributions and Employment Insurance premiums) and has paid such amounts including any penalties or interest due to the appropriate authority on a timely basis and in the form required under the appropriate legislation and will continue to do so;


(x)

since the date of its incorporation, the Optionor has fully complied, in a timely manner, with any and all applicable tax laws, including the collection and remission of all taxes payable by or for which the Optionor is responsible to collect and remit, in respect of the supply of goods and services by the Optionor and the Optionor will continue to so comply;


(y)

the tax accounts of the Optionor, for the purposes of the applicable tax laws are true and complete in all material respects;


Corporate Records


(z)

the Corporate records and minute books of the Optionor contain complete and accurate minutes, (duly signed by the chairman and/or secretary of the appropriate meeting) of all meetings of the directors and shareholders of the Optionor since its date of incorporation;


(aa)

the share certificate records, the securities register, the register of disclosures , the register of directors and officers for the Optionor are contained in the corporate minute book and are complete and accurate in all respects;


Directors and Officers


(ab)

the present directors and officers of the Optionor are as follows:


Name

Position


Julio César Pulisich

President

Antonio Torre

Deputy Director


Legal Proceedings


(ac)

there are no actions, suits, proceedings or outstanding claims or demands instituted before any federal, provincial, municipal or other governmental department, court, commission, board, bureau, agency or instrumentality, domestic or foreign, or by or before an arbitrator or arbitration board or pending or threatened against or affecting the Optionor or its property, the Optionor’s assets or the Optionor’s Business, nor is there any basis for any such action, suit, proceeding or claim;


(ad)

there are no orders, decrees, injunctions or judgments of any court or of any federal, provincial, territorial or municipal department, agency, commission, board, bureau or instrumentality, domestic or foreign, instituted, pending, threatened or obtained against or affecting the Optionor or its property, the Optionor’s assets or the Optionor’s Business; nor is there any basis for any such order, decree, injunction or judgment;


(ae)

there is no legal impediment to the continued operation, in the ordinary course, of the property, the Optionor’s assets and the Optionor’s Business;


(af)

the Optionor has not violated nor is it violating any federal, provincial, territorial or municipal statute, regulation, ordinance, rule or order applicable to the Optionor’s Business, the Optionor’s assets or to any of its properties or to its ownership thereof;


(ag)

the Optionor has complied with all applicable federal, provincial, territorial and municipal statutes, regulations, ordinances, rules and orders;


Bank Accounts and Attorneys


(ah)

Schedule B sets forth a true and complete list showing:


(i)

the name of each bank, trust company or similar institution in which the Optionor has accounts or safe deposit boxes, the number or designation of each such account and safe deposit box and the names of all persons authorized to draw thereon or to have access thereto; and


(ii)

the name of each person, firm, corporation or business organization holding a general or special power of attorney from the Optionor and a summary of the terms thereof.


Accuracy of Warranties


(ai)

neither this Agreement nor any document, schedule, list, certificate, declaration under oath or written statement now or hereafter furnished by Optionor to the Optionee in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement contains or will contain any untrue statement or misrepresentation of a material fact on the part of the Optionor, or omits or will omit on behalf of the Optionor to state a material fact necessary to make any such statement or representation therein or herein contained not misleading; and


Full Disclosure


(aj)

the Optionor has no information or knowledge of any fact not communicated to the Purchaser and relating to the Optionor or to the Optionor’s Business or to the Option Shares which, if known to the Optionee, might reasonably be expected to deter the Optionee from entering into this Agreement or from completing the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.


4.4

Additional Covenants by Optionor.    In order to induce the Optionee to enter into and consummate this Agreement, the Optionor hereby also covenants with the Optionee, with the intent that the Optionee will also rely thereon in entering into this Agreement and in concluding the transactions contemplated herein, as follows:


(a)

the Optionor will allow the Optionee to have access to all books, records, book accounts, lists of suppliers and customers of the Optionor and all other documents, files, records and other data, financial or otherwise, relating to the Optionor’s Business and the assets of the Optionor.

(b)

the Optionor will permit the Optionee, and its auditors, solicitors and other authorized persons, to make such investigation of the assets of the Optionor and of its financial and legal condition as the Purchaser deems necessary or advisable to familiarize itself with such assets and other matters and to have full access to the business premises and to all records, documents and other information related to the business and the Optionor, including all working papers (internal and external) and details of accounts and inventories prepared, obtained or used in connection with the preparation of the Optionor’s financial statements.

(c)

the Optionor will cause the Company to:

(i)

carry on the Business in the ordinary course, in a prudent, businesslike and efficient manner and substantially in accordance with the procedures and practices currently in effect; and

(ii)

endeavour all reasonable efforts to preserve and maintain the goodwill of the Business.

(d)

the Optionor will not permit the Optionor, without the prior consent in writing of the Optionee to:

(i)

purchase or sell, consume or otherwise dispose of any of its assets except in the ordinary course of business;

(ii)

enter into any contract or assume or incur any liability except in the ordinary course of business and which is not material; and

(iii)

waive or surrender any material right.


4.5

Survival of the Representations, Warranties and Covenants by the Optionor .   Each and every representation and warranty of the Optionor contained in this Agreement and any agreement, instrument, certificate or other document executed or delivered pursuant to this Agreement shall:


(a)

be true and correct on and as of the date of exercise of the Option with the same force and effect as though made or given on the date of exercise of the Option;


(b)

remain in full force and effect notwithstanding any investigations conducted by or on behalf of the Optionee;


(c)

survive the completion of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement until the second anniversary of the date of exercise of the Option and shall continue in full force and effect for the benefit of the Optionee during that period, except that:


(i)

the representations and warranties set out in section 4.2(a) to and including 4.2(g) above shall survive and continue in full force and effect without limitation of time; and


(ii)

a claim for any breach of any of the representations and warranties contained in this Agreement or in any agreement, instrument, certificate or other document executed or delivered pursuant hereto involving fraud or fraudulent misrepresentation may be made at any time following the date of exercise of the Option, subject only to applicable limitation periods imposed by law.


5.

Representations, Warranties and Covenants by the Optionee


5.1

Warranties, Representations and Covenants by the Optionee .   In order to induce the Optionor to enter into and consummate this Agreement, the Optionee hereby warrants to, represents to and covenants with the Optionor, with the intent that the Optionor will rely thereon in entering into this Agreement and in concluding the transactions contemplated herein, that, to the best of the knowledge, information and belief of the Optionee, after having made due inquiry:


(a)

the Optionee is a company with limited liability duly and properly organized and validly subsisting under the laws of the British Virgin Islands being the only jurisdiction where it is required to be registered for the purpose of enabling it to carry on its business and own its property as presently carried on and owned;


(b)

the Optionee has good and sufficient power, authority and right to own or lease its property, to enter into this Agreement and to perform its obligations hereunder;


(c)

upon the exercise of the Option by the Optionee, if the Optionee decided to convert the Debt owed by the Optionor to the Optionee as payment for the Option, then such Debt shall be extinguished and all rights and obligations owing to the Optionee under the Debt and related to the Debt shall cease to exist;


(d)

the Optionee is not aware of any fact or circumstance which has not been disclosed to the Optionor which should be disclosed in order to prevent the representations and warranties contained in this section from being misleading or which would likely affect the decision of the Optionor to enter into this Agreement or to exercise its Option; and


(e)

the Optionee shall execute and deliver such further instruments and documents and perform such further acts as may be necessary to implement and carry out the intent of this Agreement.


5.2

Survival of the Representations, Warranties and Covenants by the Optionee .   Each representation and warranty of the Optionee contained in this Agreement or in any document, instrument, certificate or undertaking given pursuant hereto shall:


(a)

be true and correct on and as of the date of exercise of the Option with the same force and effect as though made or given on the date of exercise of the Option;


(b)

remain in full force and effect notwithstanding any investigations conducted by or on behalf of the Optionee; and


(c)

survive the completion of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement until the second anniversary of the date of exercise of the Option and shall continue in full force and effect for the benefit of the Optionor during that period, except that a claim for any breach of any of the representations and warranties contained in this Agreement or in any agreement, instrument, certificate or other document executed or delivered pursuant hereto involving fraud or fraudulent misrepresentation may be made at any time following the date of exercise of the Option, subject only to applicable limitation periods imposed by law.


6.

Right of Entry


6.1

Throughout the Option Period the directors and officers of the Optionee and its servants, agents and independent contractors, shall have the right in respect of the Property to enter thereon during business hours, with the prior and written authorization of the Optionor in order to make further analysis and studies.


7.

Obligations of the Optionor during the Option Period


7.1

During the Option Period, the Optionor shall:

(a)

maintain the Property in good standing by the doing and filing of assessment work or the making of payments in lieu thereof, by the payment of taxes and rentals, and the performance of all other actions which may be necessary in that regard and in order to keep the Property free and clear of all liens and other charges arising from the Optionor’s activities thereon; and

(b)

permit the Optionee, its employees, agents and designated consultants, at their own risk and upon prior and written authorization by the Optionor, access to the Property at all reasonable times, provided that the Optionor agrees to indemnify the Optionor from and against and to hold it harmless from all costs, claims, liabilities and expenses that the Optionee may incur or suffer as a result of any injury (including injury causing death) to any employee, agent or designated consultant of the Optionee while on the Property.


8.

Assignment


8.1

The Optionee may sell, assign, pledge or mortgage or otherwise encumber all or any part of its respective interest herein without the prior written consent of the Optionor.


9.

Surrender and Acquisition of Property Interests Prior to Termination of the Option Period


9.1

The Optionor may not, during the Option Period, abandon any one or more of the mineral claims comprised in the Property.


10

Notice


10.1

Each notice, demand or other communication required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be sent by prepaid registered mail deposited in a post office in Canada or the United States addressed to the party entitled to receive the same, or delivered to such party, at the address for such party specified above. The date of receipt of such notice, demand or other communication shall be the date of delivery thereof if delivered, or, if given by registered mail as aforesaid, shall be deemed conclusively to be the fifth day after the same shall have been so mailed, except in the case of interruption of postal services for any reason whatsoever, in which case the date of receipt shall be the date on which the notice, demand or other communication is actually received by the addressee.

10.2

Either party may at any time and from time to time notify the other party in writing of a change of address and the new address to which notice shall be given to it thereafter until further change.


11.

General


11.1

Time is expressly declared to be of the essence of this Agreement and each of its terms.

11.2

The Parties shall promptly execute or cause to be executed all documents, deeds, conveyances and other instruments of further assurance which may be reasonably necessary or advisable to carry out fully the intent of this Agreement or to record wherever appropriate the respective interests from time to time of the Parties in the Property.

11.3

No consent or waiver expressed or implied by either Party in respect of any breach or default by the other in the performance by such other of its obligations hereunder shall be deemed or construed to be a consent to or a waiver of any other breach or default.

11.4

The Agreement supersedes and replaces any other agreement or arrangement, whether oral or written, heretofore existing between the Parties in respect of the subject matter of this Agreement.

11.5

This Agreement shall be construed and enforces in accordance with the laws and courts prevailing in the State of Nevada and the Parties consent to the jurisdiction of the State of Nevada in any action, suit or proceeding relating to this Agreement.  

11.6

This Agreement shall enure to the benefit of and be binding upon the Parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and permitted assigns.

11.7

This Agreement may be signed by the Parties hereto in as many counterparts as may be necessary, and via facsimile if necessary, each of which so signed being deemed to be an original and such counterparts together constituting one and the same instrument and, notwithstanding the date of execution, being deemed to bear the effective execution date as set forth on the front page of this Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF each of the Parties hereto has hereunto executed this Agreement as of the execution date as set forth on the front page of this Agreement


UNITED ENERGY METALS S.A.



Per:

/s/ Julio Pulisich


Authorized Signatory


Julio Pulisich, President


             (print name and title)

INTERNATIONAL MINERAL RESOURCES LTD.



Per:

/s/ T. Barry Dempsey


Authorized Signatory


T. Barry Dempsey for: Cockburn Directors, Ltd.

Authorized representative for

International Mineral Resources Ltd.

(print name and title)






SCHEDULE A

THIS IS SCHEDULE A to the Option Agreement made as of September 21, 2005

Description of Mineral Titles


Table 1:

 
 

Chubut Uranium Project

 

List of Cateos

Cerro Solo Group

Eastern Cateos

UE No

Cateo No

Recording

Area

UE No

Cateo No

Recording

Area

   

Date

(ha)

   

Date

(ha)

1

14.548

April 12, 2005

7,889

29

14.601

May 5, 2005

9,981

2

14.549

April 12, 2005

9,982

30

14.602

May 5, 2005

9,979

3

14.550

April 12, 2005

7,893

33

14.603

May 5, 2005

9,979

4

14.551

April 12, 2005

9,614

37

14.604

May 5, 2005

9,976

27

14.552

April 12, 2005

7,086

34

14.605

May 5, 2005

9,979

28

14.553

April 12, 2005

9,961

       

5

14.594

May 5, 2005

9,123

       

7

14.595

May 5, 2005

10,106

       

10

14.596

May 5, 2005

9,982

       

13

14.597

May 5, 2005

9,931

       

14

14.598

May 5, 2005

8,732

       

16

14.599

May 5, 2005

9,982

       

18

14.600

May 5, 2005

9,981

       

Total Area

120,263

 

49,893







SCHEDULE B – Current Bank Accounts for United Energy Metals S.A


THIS IS SCHEDULE B to the Option Agreement made as of September 21, 2005


Banco Itau Buen Ayre - Account Nº 406293 – 100/3. The signing authorities are: Julio César Pulisich and Antonio Torre - United Energy Metals S.A







SCHEDULE C

THIS IS SCHEDULE C to the Option Agreement made as of September 21, 2005

Constating Documents


Please refer to the materials attached hereto







SCHEDULE D

THIS IS SCHEDULE D to the Option Agreement made as of September 21, 2005

Financial Statements of the Company


Please refer to the materials attached hereto







SCHEDULE E

THIS IS SCHEDULE E to the Option Agreement made as of September 21, 2005

Material Contracts







SCHEDULE F

THIS IS SCHEDULE F to the Option Agreement made as of September 21, 2005

Permits






SCHEDULE G

THIS IS SCHEDULE G to the Option Agreement made as of September 21, 2005


TO UNITED ENERGY METALS S.A.



NOTICE AND AGREEMENT OF EXERCISE OF OPTION




The Optionee hereby exercises its Option to acquire 499 shares (each an “ Option Share ”) in the capital of United Energy Metals S.A. (up to 99.8% ownership interest), dated September __, 2005.


The Optionee has decided to make payment for the Option Shares in the following manner:


Please check one:


(i)

Payment of US$70,300 to the Optionor

______


(ii)

Conversion of the Debt into 499 Option Shares

______



The Optionee, and the Optionee’s designate if applicable, understands that no Option Shares will be issued unless and until, in the opinion of United Energy Metals S.A. (the “ Company ”), any applicable registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 , as amended (the “ Securities Act ”) and any other requirements of law or any regulatory bodies having jurisdiction over such issuance and delivery, shall have been fully complied with.  The Optionee, and the Optionee’s designate if applicable, hereby acknowledges, represents, warrants and agrees that Option Shares are being acquired for investment purposes and not with a view to distribution, and the warranties and representations and other provisions of the Option Agreement continue to pertain to the Optionee and the Optionee continues to comply with the same.


The Optionee, and the Optionee’s designate if applicable, will assist the Company in the filing of and will timely file all reports that the Optionee, or the Optionee’s designate if applicable, may be required to file under the federal securities laws. The Optionee, and the Optionee’s designate if applicable, agrees that the Company may, without liability for its good faith actions, place legend restrictions upon the Option Shares in compliance with applicable securities laws.







The 499 Option Shares specified above are to be issued in the following registration manner as directed by the Optionee and, if applicable, to the Optionee’s designate as set forth hereinbelow:


Registration respecting the Optionee (must be completed by the Optionee) :




        (Print Optionee’s name)

(Optionee’s signature)



(Address for Optionee)





Registration respecting the Optionee’s designate (complete if applicable only) :




  (Print Optionee’s designate’s name)

  (Optionee’s designate’s signature)



(Address for Optionee’s designate)

























CERTIFICATION UNDER RULE 13A-14(A)


I, Richard Bachman, certify that:


1.

I have reviewed this 10-KSB of Urex Energy Corp.;


2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4.

The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:


a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;


c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;


d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and


5.

The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):


a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal controls over financial reporting.


Date: July 12, 2006

/s/ Richard Bachman


Richard Bachman, President and Director (Principal Executive Officer)







CERTIFICATION UNDER RULE 13A-14(A)


I, Richard Bachman, certify that:


1.

I have reviewed this 10-KSB of Urex Energy Corp.;


2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4.

The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:


a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;


c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;


d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and


5.

The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):


a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal controls over financial reporting.


Date: July 12, 2006

/s/ Richard Bachman


Richard Bachman, President and Director (Principal Financial Officer)







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 of Urex Energy Corp., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, Richard Bachman, President and a director of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


1.

The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


2.

The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  



Dated: July 12, 2006

/s/ Richard Bachman


Richard Bachman, President and Director (Principal Executive Officer)








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 of Urex Energy Corp., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, Richard Bachman, President and a director of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


1.

The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


2.

The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  



Dated: July 12, 2006

/s/ Richard Bachman


Richard Bachman, President and Director (Principal Financial Officer)
















I NDEPENDENT R EVIEW

OF THE

R IO C HUBUT U RANIUM P ROJECT C HUBUT P ROVINCE , A RGENTINA

FOR

L AKEFIELD V ENTURES , I NC .

Reno, Nevada, USA

September 23, 2005


            T ABLE OF C ONTENTS      
1     O VERVIEW     1  
2     I NTRODUCTION     2  
3     D ISCLAIMER     3  
4     P ROPERTY AND L OCATION     3  
    4.1         PROPERTY D ESCRIPTION     3  
    4.2         TERMS OF A CQUISITION     5  
    4.2.1     International – United Energy Agreement     5  
    4.2.2     Lakefield Ventures - International Share Purchase Agreement     5  
5     A CCESS , I NFRASTRUCTURE , P HYSIOGRAPHY , AND C LIMATE     5  
6     P ROPERTY AND A REA H ISTORY     6  
7     G EOLOGICAL S ETTING     6  
    7.1         REGIONAL G EOLOGY     6  
    7.2         LOCAL G EOLOGY     8  
8     D EPOSIT M ODEL     8  
9     M INERALIZATION     9  
10         E XPLORATION     10  
11         D RILLING     10  
12         S AMPLING M ETHOD AND A PPROACH     10  
13         S AMPLING P REPARATION , A NALYSIS , AND S ECURITY     10  
14         D ATA V ERIFICATION     11  
15         A DJACENT P ROPERTY     11  
16         M INERAL P ROCESSING AND M ETALLURGICAL T ESTING     12  
17         M INERAL R ESOURCE E STIMATES     12  


    L AKEFIELD V ENTURES , I NC .     R IO C HUBUT U RANIUM P ROJECT , C HUBUT P ROVINCE , A RGENTINA  
 
18         C ONCLUSIONS         12  
19         R ECOMMENDATIONS         12  
20         R EFERENCES         14  
21         C ERTIFICATE OF Q UALIFICATIONS AND D ECLARATION     15  
 
                L IST OF T ABLES      
    Table 1     List of Cateos (Exploration Permits)      
    Table 2     Table of Formations      
    Table 3     Rio Chubut Uranium Project Budget      
 
                L IST OF F IGURES      
    Figure     1     Project Location, Chubut Province, Argentina      
    Figure     2     Location of Cateos (Exploration Permits)      
    Figure     3     Regional Geology          
    Figure     4     Simplified Regional Geology      
    Figure     5     Geological Cross-Section of Cerro Solo Uranium Deposit      




The Cerro Solo deposit is a sandstone-type U-Mo deposit with mineralized layers distributed in fluvial conglomeratic sandstone of the Cretaceous Chubut Group lying 50 to 130 metres (“m”) below surface.

Fluvial channel ways within the Chubut Group rocks have been recognized as particularly favourable hosts for uranium mineralization from which some small-scale production has been derived. Uranium occurrences also occur in volcaniclastic tuffs of the Chubut Group. CNEA estimates that the Chubut Group rocks are distributed over an area of 170,000 square kilometres (“km 2 ”) with airborne radiometric data identifying over 2,300 uranium anomalies within them (CNEA, 1997). Due to excessive focusing on the evaluation of the Cerro Solo deposit, ensuing financial constraints, and a morbid global uranium market, CNEA has assessed few of these airborne anomalies.

International, by way of an agreement with the Argentine mineral resource company United Energy Metals S.A. (“United Energy”), has acquired a strategic property position adjacent to and along strike of both ends of the fluvial channel which hosts the Cerro Solo deposit as well as two past producing uranium mines. Several other smaller exploration properties have also been acquired to secure selected targets of interest.

The property grouping warrants exploration and the recommended work program includes:

 Acquisition and interpretation of existing airborne radiometric and magnetic data.

 Validate anomalies on the Properties and/or target additional anomalies for acquisition based upon the interpretation of the geophysical airborne data.

 Verify locations of known and interpreted radiometric anomalies and evaluate by mapping, geophysical surveying, trenching, and drilling with gamma logging.

The estimated cost to undertake the recommended work program is US$300,000.

Note: All currency values in this report are quoted in US dollars unless otherwise indicated .

2 I NTRODUCTION

The Company commissioned the author to undertake a review of the Rio Chubut Uranium Project, consisting of several exploration permits (the “Properties”), located in central Chubut Province in southern Argentina, evaluate the Properties’ mineral potential for uranium, and prepare an independent appraisal report.

The study is a combined historical document and data review as well as a report on direct observations made during a two-day field visit in June 2005. The Company has performed no exploration on the Properties.

The author has depended heavily upon historical reports, maps, and compiled digital data furnished by International, government issued literature, and third party documents in the public domain in the preparation of this report. Those sources utilized are cited within Section 20 as well as within the body of this report.


3     D ISCLAIMER                              
    The author has vetted neither the legal standing of the Properties described herein nor their  
    ownership status.                              
 
4     P ROPERTY AND L OCATION                          
 
4.1         Property Description                          
    Figure 1 depicts the location of the Rio Chubut Uranium Project in Chubut Province,  
    Argentina with the project group being centred at:              



 
            Property Group     Latitude     Longitude     Aggregate Area      
                Centeroid     Centeroid     (hectares)      





        Rio Chubut Project     43 45’ S       68 00’ W         170,000      





 
    International Mineral Resources, Ltd., a company domiciled in the Turk and Caicos  
    Islands, has acquired the Properties by way of an agreement with United Energy Metals  
    S.A., an Argentine company domiciled in Ciudad Mendoza, Province of Mendoza,  
    Argentina. International is passing a 99.8% stake in United Energy to the Company by  
    share purchase agreement.     Terms of the agreement between the Company and  
    International as well as the agreement between International and United Energy are  
    outlined in Section 4.2 below.                      







      Table 1:                              
Rio Chubut Uranium Project
List of Cateos

        Cerro Solo Group             Eastern Cateos      







      UE No Cateo No     Recording     Area     UE No Cateo No Recording       Area  
            Date               (ha)             Date       (ha)  










    1         14.548     April 12, 2005     7,889           29     14.601     May 5, 2005     9,981  
    2         14.549     April 12, 2005     9,982           30     14.602     May 5, 2005     9,979  
    3         14.550     April 12, 2005     7,893           33     14.603     May 5, 2005     9,979  
    4         14.551     April 12, 2005     9,614           37     14.604     May 5, 2005     9,976  
    27         14.552     April 12, 2005     7,086           34     14.605     May 5, 2005     9,979  
    28         14.553     April 12, 2005     9,961                  
    5         14.594     May 5, 2005     9,123                  
    7         14.595     May 5, 2005     10,106                  
    10         14.596     May 5, 2005     9,982                  
    13         14.597     May 5, 2005     9,931                  
    14         14.598     May 5, 2005     8,732                  
    16         14.599     May 5, 2005     9,982                  
    18         14.600     May 5, 2005     9,981                  









            Total Area     120,263                 49,893  















Exploration permit (“cateo”) distribution is illustrated in Figure 2 and cateo particulars  
are listed in Table 1. The project locale encompasses a rectangular area approximately  
160km by 195km. On the west side lays a contiguous block of 13 cateos covering an  
aggregate area of approximately 120,000ha. The long axis of the grouping trends north-  
northeast (“NNE”) and is 74km long by an average 20km wide. The central embayment  
plunging into the group from the east that almost bisects the property block is occupied  
by the Cerro Solo deposit property controlled by CNEA. The old Los Adobes Mine is  
located 4km NNE of the Cerro Solo deposit. A 72ha rectangular reservation surrounds  
the mine. Cateo No. 14.500 (United Energy No. 3) envelops this reservation, which is  
also bisected by the main road. Five additional widely separated cateos lie on the east  
side of the project area. These are nearly 10,000ha in size each.      
According to the Argentine Mining Act, the level of cateo filing fees and extent of tenure  
are contingent upon permit size. Cateos have multi-year tenures before attracting  
additional governmental maintenance costs. For instance, a 10,000ha cateo attracts no  
further maintenance fees for 1,100 days (3 years). At that point in time, the property size  
must be reduced by at least one half and a mining licence applied for. Further  
exploration, feasibility work, and eventually exploitation, pending regulatory approval,  
can be carried out under a mining licence.              
The cateos are “paper staked” with no signifying demarcation monuments being  
erected. Hence, cateo boundaries have not been surveyed.          
There are no known environmental liabilities inherent to the Properties although a  
decommissioned uranium processing facility is located within the southern portion of  
Cateo No. 14.599 (United Energy No. 16), near the intersection of the main road and the  
Rio Chubut (Figure 2).                  
Permitting prior to the commencement of exploration activities must be obtained from  
the governing entity responsible for the environment. Upon the cessation of exploration  
activities, remedial action is required to reduce the effects of any physical disturbance  
made during the course of the work program. The Company will be applying for these  
permits.                      
Mineral rights supercede surface rights in Argentina although mineral explorers must  
obtain ingress approval from surface owners prior to performing any work and pay  
compensation for any damage. A dispute resolution system is in place under the  
Argentine Mining Act.                  
According     to     Argentina’s     Investor’s     Guide     website  
( http://www.hvra.com.ar/enminoil.htm ), foreign investments in Argentina are welcome in  
the mining business, including the nuclear minerals. Ratification by Congress of the  
legislation to lift the state-owned company monopoly of nuclear resources is  
forthcoming. CNEA, formerly the only entity vested with the power to explore and  
exploit nuclear minerals, has been earmarked for privatization. The Argentine  


government offers various tax and tariff incentives to attract foreign mining investment. Minimal royalties are payable to the Provincial Government. Environmental impact study requirements are of international standards. Rigorous environment controls have been put in place for the safe handling of radioactive materials (Section M, 2003) over which the Autoridad Regulatoria Nuclear (“ARN”) has jurisdiction.

4.2 Terms of Acquisition

4.2.1 International – United Energy Agreement

International has gained control of the Properties by acquiring a 99.8% interest in United Energy. In exchange for the interest, International has waived a debt owed to it by United Energy.

4.2.2 Lakefield Ventures - International Share Purchase Agreement

The Company has entered into a share purchase agreement with International whereby it will acquire a 99.8% share interest in United Energy in exchange for a cash disbursement of US$50,000 and 8 million shares of the Company being paid and issued to International respectively. International will also retain a 5% Net Smelter Returns (“NSR”) royalty interest in uranium and all other minerals. The Company has the option of purchasing a 2% NSR royalty interest for US$4 million at any time.

5 A CCESS , I NFRASTRUCTURE , P HYSIOGRAPHY , AND C LIMATE

The centre of the project area lays 270km west of the provincial capital of Rawson (population 30,000), a small port city at the mouth of the Rio Chubut (Figure 1). The regional airport serving Rawson is located in the nearby town of Trelew. National Road 25 (“NR 25”), a paved road in sound condition, extends west from Rawson and bisects the project area. A network of aggregate and dirt roads in good condition branch off NR 25 and either cut or touch upon any particular cateo, facilitating reasonable access in most cases (Figure 2). The towns of Paso de Los Indios (population ~1,000) and Las Plumas (population ~500), located along NR 25, bracket the project area to the west and east respectively. A small hotel and restaurant exists in Paso de Los Indios.

Relief in the project area is low with elevation ranging between 200m and 650m above sea level. Vegetation consists of low shrubs and related brush and grasses. Climate is semi-arid and average annual temperature varies from 6 C to 14 C whereas absolute minimum and maximum temperatures range from –20 C to 40 C respectively (Fernández and Busso, 199?). Although heavy snowfalls can occur, roads stay open most of the year.

The large contiguous Cerro Solo cateo grouping is cut by the Rio Chubut at its southern end. Although the Rio Chubut is wide (>50m) in the project area, it is generally shallow. The Rio Chubut flows east and eventually spills into the Atlantic Ocean at Rawson.


The primary industry of the area is sheep ranching with related textile production based in Trelew and Rawson. The ranches (estancias) cover sweeping tracts of ground and are very thinly inhabited by caretakers.

A seasonal dirt airstrip of approximately 800m length is located 1.7km north of the Cerro Solo deposit and remains clear of vegetation. Minimal work would be required to reactivate the strip.

The Properties are large enough to support mining and milling operations.

6 P ROPERTY AND A REA H ISTORY

All work in the past has been conducted under the auspices of governmental agencies. The project area has undergone cursory prospecting.

The general area has been recognized for uranium potential since the 1960’s, with two small producers, the Los Adobes and the Cerro Cóndor mines, being worked in the 1970’s. The Cerro Solo deposit was discovered by CNEA in 1979 while searching for blind extensions of the outcropping mineralization at the Los Adobes Mine (CNEA, 1997). See Section 15 for a more detailed description of the Cerro Solo deposit.

An airborne radiometric and magnetic survey was flown over the San Jorge Basin in the late 1970’s. A total of 2,372 uranium anomalies were detected within a 170,00 0 km 2 survey area (CNEA, 1997).

Little is known of any past exploration work on the actual catoes that form this property assemblage.

7 G EOLOGICAL S ETTING

The following account is summarized primarily from CNEA (1997):

7.1 Regional Geology

Regional Geology is depicted in Figure 3. A Table of Formations is presented in Table 2. The San Jorge Gulf Basin dominates the central and northeast portions of the Provinces of Chubut and Santa Cruz respectively. The basin is predominantly comprised of rocks of the Chubut Group. These are Cretaceous Period fluvial and pyroclastic sediments overlying a Jurassic Period basement composed of basalt and andesite volcanic rocks with lesser volcaniclastic and sedimentary rocks (Lonco Trapial Formation). The source of the Cretaceous Chubut Group is Jurassic rhyolitic volcanic rocks of the Marifil Formation that cover the eastern portions of Chubut and Rio Negro Provinces. These acid rocks are the probable uranium source for deposits in the Chubut Group rocks (CNEA, 1997). Pockets of Triassic Period mafic volcanics overlie the Jurassic and Cretaceous rocks.


Quaternary alluvials and Pliocence glacial deposits can overlie all rock types.

Some large-scale Cretaceous Period granitic intrusives occur along the western edge of Chubut Province and border with Chile.







Mapped and interpreted faults occur principally in Jurassic through Tertiary age rocks. A single conjugate fault set is recognizable, trending northeast-southwest and northwest-southeast. The effect of folding was minimal so most strata are flat lying to sub-horizontal.

7.2 Local Geology

Volcanic tuffs of the Cretaceous Cerro Barcino formation underlie most of the project area (Figure 4). These tuffs tend to thinly cover much of the underlying fluvial derived rocks deposited in broad braided channel environments. The two fluvial areas depicted on Figure 4 describe the overall extent braided channels have been found to occur. On average, individual braided streams have a propensity to form sandstone bodies that are metres thick and tens to hundreds of metres across (Bridge et al., 2000). To date the better uranium deposits have been discovered in sedimentary rocks deposited by braided, high-energy fluvial processes. This includes the Los Adobes Formation in the Cerro Solo area, and the Arroyo del Pajarito member in particular. This member is up to 150m thick within the Cerro Solo deposit. Mineralization can also occur in volcanic tuffs of the Cerro Barcino formation and in surface soils with a caliche association. Caliche is desert soil formed by the near surface crystallization of calcite and/or other soluble minerals by upward-moving solutions.

The occurrence of outcroppings within the cateos visited was sparse during the course of the site visit.

Faulting at Cerro Solo predominantly strikes northwest and dips eastwards. Most displacement is lateral with a lesser vertical component. However, interaction with the northeast trending conjugate member of the fault set produces a shearing effect.

8 D EPOSIT M ODEL

The following model description is summarized after Tilsley (1988):

The applicable model for the project area is the channel-type variation of the broader sandstone-hosted category. Sandstone-hosted ores are the most important source of

uranium in the Untied States, over 300,000 tonnes of U 3 O 8 . Significant deposits of this type

are also known to occur in Japan, Australia, Africa, and of course Argentina. The geometry of these deposits is variable depending on the amount of sedimentary and hydrological controls. In the channel-type variation, uranium concentrations are hosted within paleo-channels filled by more permeable sandstone and/or conglomerate deposited by high-energy fluvial regimes.

Most of the uranium now concentrated in sandstones probably originated in source areas topographically higher than the sediments at the time of ore formation. Uranium is potentially derived by weathering from acid igneous rocks, pyroclastic rocks, and lavas


from this higher ground. In many situations, tuffaceous components of the host rocks are believed to have provided much of the metal.

After release by weathering, metal is carried in solution in surface and ground waters into and within the sediments along aquifers that may extend to great depth below the erosion surface.

The concentration mechanism is the same in all cases. Oxidizing solutions carrying dissolved uranium as the uranyl (U 6+ ) carbonate complex enters a reducing environment

where U 4+ ion is the dominant and uraninite (UO 2 ) is precipitated. Deposition of uraninite

occurs at the so-called oxidation/reduction (“redox”) front. The most visibly obvious redox front is that of iron, since the reduced minerals are grey-green and the oxidized minerals are reddish-brown. The uranyl complex is reduced and precipitated from solution at an Eh close to that of the Fe 2+ /Fe 3+ boundary, so it is visibly associated with the iron redox front. Other elements, such as vanadium, selenium, and molybdenum, that may be associated with the uranium, form minerals that have redox boundaries slightly displaced from those of uranium and iron, either in front or behind.

The redox boundaries migrate within the sandstone at a velocity which is a function of the rate at which free oxygen is supplied to the system by ground water and the oxygen-demand of the sediments through which the ground water flows. Organic carbon and ferrous iron are the primary oxygen demanding agents in the system, whose presence would slow migration. The rate at which redox fronts move in sediments is relatively slow, but in terms of geologic time, these fronts are transient (~1m per 10,000 years).

9 M INERALIZATION

Although some of the properties were acquired on the basis of uranium occurrence locations plotted on a CNEA map, the type and quality of this mineralization are not known. However mineralization at the Cerro Solo deposit is associated with fluvial member rocks of 90m to 150m thicknesses. Here mineralization occurs within the Arroyo del Pajarito member of the Los Adobes formation in two sections: a basal mesosilicious section and an overlying acid section. Dacitic and trachitic porphyritic volcanics and tuffs comprise the lower mesosilicious section while the overlying acid section is composed of rhyolitic volcanic clasts (tuffs, ignimbrites, and porphyritic volcanics) (Figure 5).

Mineralization is hosted in stratabound, horizontal to sub-horizontal, tabular bodies. Faulting has caused minor displacements.

Uranium mineralization is hosted in the base of the acid section only. The mesosilicious section is generally barren. Rocks hosting uranium mineralization exist in a reduced chemical environment with abundant organic material, exhibit generally higher paleo-permeability, contain sulphide minerals, as well as contain relatively higher abundances of carbonates occurring as fracture-filling cement.



Uranium minerals in order of abundance are uraninite and coffinite. Molybdenum occurs in the form of jordisite and ilsemannite in close association with uranium and organic material. Some anomalous val u es of renium also occur in association with molybdenum.

10 E XPLORATION

The Company has performed no exploration on the Properties. The Properties were selected and acquired either on the basis of being along strike of the Cerro Solo and other deposits or hosting a known uranium occurrence plotted on a map within the public domain (CNEA, 1997).

11 D RILLING

None of the Properties have known to be drill tested.

12 S AMPLING M ETHOD AND A PPROACH

No known samples have been taken from the Properties.

13 S AMPLING P REPARATION , A NALYSIS , AND S ECURITY

No known samples have been taken from the Properties.



15 A DJACENT P ROPERTY

The following account is summarized primarily from CNEA (1997):

The past producing uranium mines of Los Adobes and the Cerro Cóndor are situated north and southwest of the Cerro Solo deposit respectively. As previously mentioned, the Cerro Solo deposit was discovered by CNEA in 1979 while searching for blind extensions of the outcropping mineralization at the Los Adobes Mine.

At Cerro Solo, uranium mineralization has been found to occur over approximately 320ha, but only 90ha were selected for economic feasibility evaluation. A total of 410 holes were drilled on a combination of 50m x 50m, 50m x 25m, and 25m x 25m grids. An additional 200 holes were drilled on a wider grid to test for outlier mineralization. A total of 72,300m have been drilled on the property, with 47,800m of that being drilled to evaluate the Cerro Solo deposit.

Nuclear Assurance Corporation International (USA) carried out a preliminary feasibility study in 1997. Estimated resources are restricted to two primary sectors covering 86ha. Eight mineralized bodies have been identified within these two sectors, with one body hosting 50% of the resource at 70m of depth. Average tenor of all bodies is 0.3% to 0.5% U


and 0.2% Mo. A “recoverable resource” of 4,600 tonnes (2,600 Indicated and 2,000 Inferred) has been estimated. Uranium tenor was primarily determined by the gamma logging method. Extent of the chemical analysis for both U and Mo is not known. Both open pit and underground mining methods were envisioned along with a minimum mining width of 2.5m. Limited metallurgical testing indicated greater than 95% and 55% recovery for U and Mo by conventional treatment methods respectively.

As previously indicated, the terminology of this resource is not fully defined so it cannot be relied upon. Also, the occurrence of this resource at Cerro Solo does not conclusively infer equal or better resources will be found elsewhere, although the project area does exhibit an attractive foundation upon which to base further exploration.

16 M INERAL P ROCESSING AND M ETALLURGICAL T ESTING

No known metallurgical testing has been performed on samples from the Properties.

17 M INERAL R ESOURCE E STIMATES

No known mineral resources have been determined for the Properties.

18 C ONCLUSIONS

This independent review has achieved its objects and established that:

1. The historical data, albeit limited, forms a reasonable foundation upon which to base additional exploration. The entire project area appears to be under explored.

2. The geological environment present is conducive to channel-type sandstone hosted uranium deposits.

3. The property position along strike of the Cerro Solo deposit is particularly commanding.

19 R ECOMMENDATIONS

Recommended work includes the following:

1. Acquisition and interpretation of existing airborne radiometric and magnetic data.

2. Validate anomalies on the Properties and/or target additional anomalies for acquisition based upon the interpretation of the geophysical airborne data.

3. Verify ground locations of known and interpreted radiometric anomalies and evaluate by mapping, geophysical surveying, trenching, and reverse circulation drilling with gamma logging as an initial phase of a regional exploration program with the potential for a multi-year life span.

Work to accomplish the above recommendations for a period of one year is estimated to cost approximately US$300,000. The particulars of the budget are outlined in Table 3 below.




20 R EFERENCES

Bridge, JS, Jalfin, GA, and Georgieff, SM (2000)

Geometry, Lithofacies, and Spatial Distribution of Cretaceous Fluvial Sandstone Bodies, Argentina: Outcrop Analog for the Hydro-Bearing Chubut Group; in Journal of Sedimentary Research; March 2000; v. 70; no. 2; p. 341-359.

CNEA (1997)

Cerro Solo, Paso de Los Indios, Provincia del Chubut, República Agentina, An Uranium Exploration – Production Project in Patagonia: a report prepared by the Comisión National de Energía Atómica of Argentina. 17p.

Fernández, OV and Busso, CA (199?)

Arid and Semi-Arid Rangelands: Two Thirds of Argentina; RALA Report No. 200, CERZOS and Departamento de Argentina, Universidad Nacional del Sur, 8000 Bahia Blanca, Argentina. 20p.

Section M (2003)

Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management; National Report, Section M, Republic of Argentina. 36p.

Tilsley, JE (1988)

Genetic Considerations Relating to Some Uranium Ore Deposits; in Ore Deposit Models, Geoscience Canada, Reprint Series 3: ed. RG Roberts and PA Sheahan, p. 91-102.

World Energy Council (2001)

Survey of Energy Resources 2001; paper by the World Energy Council. 25p.