Mr. Abdoo’s extensive knowledge of the energy and energy services industries, and his extensive experience serving on the boards of directors of other companies qualify him to serve as a member of our Board of Directors.
Manfred E. Birnbaum
has served on the Board of Directors since 2007 and has been an independent management consultant in the energy and power industries since 1994. Mr. Birnbaum’s consulting services include assistance on divestitures, contract dispute resolution, technology licensing, and developing marketing strategies. From 1982 to 1985, Mr. Birnbaum was chief executive officer of English Electric Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of General Electric Company of England. Prior to that, Mr. Birnbaum held various senior management positions at Westinghouse Electric Corporation between 1958 and 1982. Mr. Birnbaum serves as a director of STW Resources Holding Corp. (OTC: STWS), a water reclamation services company. Mr. Birnbaum earned a B.A. in mechanical engineering from Polytechnic Institute of the City University of New York and a Master of Science degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Pennsylvania.
Mr. Birnbaum’s longstanding quality service as a member of our Board of Directors, as well as his significant experience serving as chief executive officer of English Electric Corp., gives him an understanding of the role of the board of directors and management. He also brings to the Board of Directors expertise and leadership skills he has acquired as an executive and consultant in the energy and power industries.
Eric C. Apfelbach
has served as our Vice Chairman of the Board since July 2015. Mr. Apfelbach service as our Chief Executive Officer from January 2010 to July 2015. From December 2008 until September 2009, Mr. Apfelbach served as President and CEO of M2E Power, Inc., a start-up technology company. From August 2003 until November 2008, Mr. Apfelbach served as President, CEO and a member of the board of directors, including Chairman from 2004 to 2008, of Virent Energy Systems, Inc., a catalytic biofuel company. Before Virent, Mr. Apfelbach co-founded Alfalight, Inc. where, as President and CEO, he helped grow the high power diode laser company to 85 employees in two years and led the company through multiple financings. Prior to Alfalight, Mr. Apfelbach was Vice President of Global Sales and Marketing at Planar Systems, Inc. (Nasdaq: PLNR), a flat-panel display designer and manufacturer, and held operating responsibility for the LCD division. He began his career working as an engineer in the semiconductor industry, rising to senior management at Applied Materials, one of the world’s largest semiconductor equipment companies. He is a director of Xolve, Inc. and National Electrostatics Corporation (NEC). In 2006, he was elected to the Board of the Wisconsin Technology Council. Mr. Apfelbach received a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1984.
Mr. Apfelbach brings extensive business and leadership experience to the Board of Directors. With his significant knowledge of and breadth of experience in the high technology industry in general and the alternative energy industry in particular, he provides the Board of Directors with a vital understanding of our business.
Paul F. Koeppe
has served as our Chairman since September 2010. Mr. Koeppe was President, CEO and founder of Superconductivity, Inc., a manufacturer of superconducting magnetic energy storage systems, from 1988 to 1997 when it was acquired by American Superconductor Corp. (Nasdaq: AMSC), an electricity solutions company. He then served as Executive Vice President of Strategic Planning for American Superconductor until his retirement in 2001. From 1993 to 1995, Mr. Koeppe was acting CEO and chairman of the executive committee of the board of directors of Best Power, Inc., a supplier of uninterruptible power supply equipment. Mr. Koeppe also serves as a director of InContact, Inc. (Nasdaq: SAAS), a developer of contact center software. Mr. Koeppe also served as a director of Distributed Energy Systems Corp., from 2003 to 2010 and also as a member of the Board of Directors at Northern Power Systems from 1998 until 2003 when Northern was acquired by Distributed Energy Systems Corp. Prior to founding Superconductivity, Inc. Mr. Koeppe worked for Wisconsin Power and Light Company for 15 years in a variety of functions. He has earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in Business Administration from Lakeland College and Associate Degrees in Materials Management and Electrical Power Technology.
Mr. Koeppe’s extensive executive, managerial and leadership experience, including many years in the energy services industry, positions him well to serve as a member of our Board of Directors. His business acumen and experience on the boards of directors of numerous companies make him a valuable addition to our Board of Directors.
Theodore Stern
has served in several executive positions in the energy and software industries over his career. He currently serves as Chairman of the Board of Directors of InContact, Inc. (Nasdaq: SAAS), a rapidly growing software-as-a-service company in Salt Lake City, UT. Mr. Stern also was a Senior Executive Vice President and member of the Board of Directors of Westinghouse Electric Corporation until his retirement. In his last position at Westinghouse Electric, Mr. Stern was responsible for multiple business units, including Power Generation, Energy Systems and Governmental and Environmental Affairs. The businesses reporting to Mr. Stern totaled more than $3 billion in annual revenue and 50,000 employees. Mr. Stern served as Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of Superconductivity, Inc. of Madison, WI, a small technology company, until it was acquired in April 1997. Mr. Stern also served on the board of directors of Copperweld Corporation of Pittsburgh, PA, a privately-owned steel and cable manufacturer, until its acquisition by LTV. Mr. Stern also served on the board of directors of Northern Power Systems of Waitsfield, VT, a privately-owned manufacturer of renewable and distributed generation systems until it was acquired by Distributed Energy Systems Incorporated (DESC). Mr. Stern also served on the board of directors of DESC. Mr. Stern holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from the Pratt Institute and a Master of Arts degree in Theoretical Mathematics from New York University. He is a fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers and a member of the National Academy of Engineering. He is the author of a number of technical papers on nuclear power technology.
Mr. Stern brings his over 20-years of experience serving as a director with public companies to our Board of Directors. This experience, which includes service as chairman and as a member of audit, compensation and governance committees, provides our Board of Directors with a valuable perspective regarding public company governance, corporate management and strategy, and board practices.
Hoong Khoeng Cheong
has more than 20 years of engineering and operation experience in solar and electronics industries. He has served in various management positions at LDK Solar Co., Ltd. from 2011 to 2014, and was appointed as the Chairman of the Management Board and Chief Executive Officer of Sunways AG, a publicly-listed company in Germany. In October 2014, LDK Solar Co., Ltd. and its U.S. subsidiaries filed for Chapter 15 bankruptcy protection in Wilmington, Delaware. Mr. Cheong previously served as the General Manager of Solar Power, Inc. from 2007 to 2011 and was responsible for PV (Solar) system design and development, as well as the manufacturing of key components for solar modules and racking systems before joining LDK Solar Co., Ltd. Prior to joining the solar industry in 2007, Mr. Cheong spent 16 years in the electronics industry responsible for engineering development and manufacturing of liquid crystal display products, and he served as the Vice President of Engineering of an affiliate of Flextronics.
Mr. Cheong’s extensive executive, managerial and leadership experience, including many years in the solar industry, positions him well to serve as a member of our Board of Directors.
Pursuant to the Governance Agreement, dated as of July 13, 2015, between the Company and Solar Power, Inc. (the “Governance Agreement”), Solar Power, Inc. is currently entitled to nominate one director to our Board of Directors. Mr. Cheong has been nominated by Solar Power, Inc. in accordance with the Governance Agreement.
Bradley L. Hansen
has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since July 2015. Mr. Hansen served as our President and Chief Operating Officer from May 2014 to July 2015. Since December 2011, Mr. Hansen has also served as the Chief Executive Officer of Anhui Meineng Energy, our China joint venture company, where he has led Meineng’s organization and development. In 2010, Mr. Hansen founded and continues to serve as Managing Partner of PowerSav Inc., a boutique private equity fund targeting China government policy supported markets. Mr. Hansen has extensive expertise in the international renewable energy and semi-conductor industries, having held various executive positions with Applied Materials, Inc. (Nasdaq: AMAT) from 1989 to 2010. While at Applied Materials, Mr. Hansen led global sales and site operation organizations for its solar product line, an important growth driver for the company. Prior to this role, Mr. Hansen directed the acquisition and integration activities for Applied Materials strategic Applied Film Corporation (formerly Nasdaq: AFCO). Mr. Hansen also held a number of key product development and operations roles at Applied Materials, including Vice President and General Manager of the Chemical Mechanical Planarization Product Business Group. Prior to Applied Materials, Mr. Hansen worked as an Engineer and Program Manager for the Boeing Electronics Company Division of The Boeing Company (NYSE: BA). Mr. Hansen holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Manufacturing Engineering from Brigham Young University and an MBA from Seattle University.
Mr. Hansen brings to the Board of Directors deep knowledge of the Company’s industry and markets and broad management and business experience, including extensive experience doing business in China.
James H. Ozanne
has served in executive and director positions in the financial services industries since 1972. During this time he has held the positions of Chief Financial Officer, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of several leasing, rental, and consumer finance businesses ranging from full service railcar leasing to general equipment finance and grocery pallet rental. He was President and Chief Executive Officer of Nation Financial Holdings and its predecessor, US WEST Capital. Prior to that, he served as Executive Vice President of GE Capital responsible for the Consumer Finance and Operating Lease/Asset Management business units. Mr. Ozanne was a director of United Rentals, Inc. (NYSE: URI), the largest equipment rental company in the world, and is a director of the Bank of Maine and NMI Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: NMIH) Previously, Mr. Ozanne was Lead Independent Director of RSC Holdings Inc., a director of Financial Security Assurance Holdings Ltd. and Distributed Energy Systems Corp., Vice Chairman and director of Fairbanks Capital Corp. and Chairman of Source One Mortgage Corporation. Mr. Ozanne received a Bachelor of Science degree from DePaul University.
Mr. Ozanne brings financial and management expertise to our Board of Directors acquired through his experience as a chief financial officer and as an operating executive. He also possesses valuable director experience from having served on the boards of directors of numerous companies, including in the roles of chairman and lead independent director.
Information Concerning Executive Officers
Set forth below is background information relating to our executive officers:
Bradley L. Hansen
is discussed above under
Information Concerning Directors and Nominees for Director
.
Daniel A. Nordloh
joined the Company as Vice President of Sales, Marketing and Business Development in April 2010 and was appointed Executive Vice President of Global Business Development in November 2011. From August 2007 to April 2010 Mr. Nordloh served as Principle of Synapse Junction, LLC a boutique advisory practice founded to assist early stage and established companies with effective growth planning and execution initiatives. In his role at Synapse, Mr. Nordloh served in numerous leadership roles, including interim President and CEO of a technology company on behalf of a private equity group. From August 2005 to August 2007 Mr. Nordloh served as President and CEO of Naviant, Inc. (formerly MTM International), a consulting and technology firm. Mr. Nordloh presently serves on the Board of Directors of Meineng Energy China and the Board of Directors of Standard Imaging Inc. Mr. Nordloh previously served as President of the Board of the not-for-profit Family Support & Resource Center of Dane County, WI. He earned an MBA from the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and a BS degree in Behavioral Sciences from Eastern Kentucky University.
Kevin A. Dennis
joined the Company as Vice President of Marketing and Sales in January 2008 and was appointed Vice President of Engineering and Product Development in 2010. Mr. Dennis has extensive expertise in the utility and renewable energy markets having held various engineering, sales and senior management roles with ABB (NYSE:ABB), a power and automation technologies company, most recently as Director, Advanced Power Electronics – North America. He also spent four years as both the sales and engineering manager for Omnion Power Engineering Corporation, a manufacturer of power electronics systems for advanced energy systems. His early career also includes five years as a design engineer with American Electric Power Service Corporation (AEP). He holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Technological University, is a registered professional engineer in the States of Wisconsin and California and is a member of the IEEE (Power Electronics Group). He participated as an industry representative in the working group for the development of Underwriters Laboratory standard, UL 741, for utility grid connected power converters. He also participates in various renewable energy and energy storage organizations.
Anthony J. Siebert
joined the Company as Vice President of Sales and Product Marketing in August 2012 and was appointed Vice President of Product Management in September 2014. Mr. Siebert has more than 20 years of experience in sales and engineering in the utility and industrial industries. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Siebert held several positions at American Superconductor Corporation (NASD: AMSC), an electricity solutions company, including from 2004 through August 2012, Managing Director of Grid Sales. From 1990 to 2004, Mr. Siebert held several engineering and sales positions with ABB, Ltd. (NYSE:ABB), a power and automation technologies company. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical Engineering Technology from Milwaukee School of Engineering and is a member of the IEEE (Power Electronics Group) and CIGRE.
Dilek Wagner
is the Company’s Vice President of Finance and Secretary. Ms. Wagner joined the Company in August 2011 as a Financial Reporting Analyst and was promoted to Director of Financial Reporting in January 2013 before being promoted to Vice President of Finance and Secretary in February 2014. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Wagner worked as a tax consultant and auditor at the public accounting firms of Ernst & Young LLP and Deloitte & Touche LLP. Ms. Wagner holds a Bachelor of Arts in Economics and a Master of Science in Management from the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Corporate Governance Principles and Board Matters
The Board of Directors has determined that each of James H. Ozanne, Richard A. Abdoo, Manfred E. Birnbaum, Paul F. Koeppe and Theodore Stern is an independent director within the meaning of the director independence standards of the NYSE MKT (“NYSE MKT”). Furthermore, the Board of Directors has determined that all of the members of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating/Governance Committee are independent within the meaning of the director independence standards of NYSE MKT and the rules of the SEC applicable to each such committee.
|
Board Leadership Structure
|
The Board of Directors has an independent chairman, meaning that the positions of chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer are not held by a single individual. The Board of Directors believes that having an independent chairman ensures that management is subject to independent and objective oversight and the independent directors have an active voice in the governance of the Company.
|
Executive Sessions of Independent Directors
|
Executive sessions of our independent directors are generally held following each regularly scheduled in-person meeting of the Board of Directors. Executive sessions do not include any non-independent directors and are led by the chairman of the Board of Directors, who is independent. The independent directors of the Board of Directors met in executive session 5 times in fiscal 2015.
|
Policies Regarding Director Nominations
|
The Nominating/Governance Committee is responsible for identifying the appropriate qualifications, skills and characteristics desired of members of the Board of Directors in the context of the needs of the business and the current composition and needs of the Board of Directors.
Director candidates are considered based upon a variety of criteria, including demonstrated business and professional skills and experiences relevant to our business and strategic direction, concern for long-term shareholder interests, personal integrity and sound business judgment. The Board of Directors seeks men and women from diverse professional backgrounds who combine a broad spectrum of relevant industry and strategic experience and expertise that, in concert, offer us and our shareholders diversity of opinion and insight in the areas most important to us and our corporate mission. In addition, nominees for director are selected to have complementary, rather than overlapping, skill sets. However, the Nominating/Governance Committee does not have a formal policy concerning the diversity of the Board of Directors. All candidates for director nominee must have time available to devote to the activities of the Board of Directors. The Nominating/Governance Committee also considers the independence of candidates for director nominee, including the appearance of any conflict in serving as a director. Candidates for director nominees who do not meet all of these criteria may still be considered for nomination to the Board of Directors, if the Nominating/Governance Committee believes that the candidate will make an exceptional contribution to us and our shareholders.
|
Process for Identifying and Evaluating Director Nominees
|
The Board of Directors is responsible for selecting its own members. The Board of Directors delegates the selection process to the Nominating/Governance Committee, with the expectation that other members of the Board of Directors, and of management, may be requested to take part in the process as appropriate. Generally, the Nominating/Governance Committee identifies candidates for director nominees in consultation with management, through the recommendations submitted by other directors or shareholders or through such other methods as the Nominating/Governance Committee deems appropriate. Once candidates have been identified, the Nominating/Governance Committee confirms that the candidates meet the qualifications for director nominees established by the Nominating/Governance Committee. The Nominating/Governance Committee may gather information about the candidates through interviews, detailed questionnaires, comprehensive background checks, or any other means that the Nominating/Governance Committee deems to be helpful in the evaluation process. The Nominating/Governance Committee then meets as a group to discuss and evaluate the qualities and skills of each candidate, both on an individual basis and taking into account the overall composition and needs of the Board of Directors. Based on the results of the evaluation process, the Nominating/Governance Committee recommends candidates for the Board of Directors’ approval as director nominees for election to the Board of Directors.
|
Policy for Recommendation of Director Nominees by Shareholders
|
The policy of the Nominating/Governance Committee is to consider properly submitted shareholder recommendations for director candidates in accordance with our Policies Regarding Recommendation of Director Candidates. Under our policy, recommendations for director candidates other than those made by the Board of Directors or the Nominating/Governance Committee must be made pursuant to timely notice in proper written form to the secretary of EnSync. To be timely, a shareholder’s recommendation of a candidate for election to the board at an annual meeting of shareholders, together with the written consent of such person to serve as a director, must be received by the secretary of EnSync not more than 120 days before the date our proxy statement was released to shareholders in connection with the previous year’s annual meeting. To be in proper written form, the notice must contain certain information concerning the nominee and the shareholder submitting the nomination and include:
·
|
the name and address of the shareholder submitting the recommendation, the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the recommendation is made and the director candidate;
|
·
|
the class and number of shares of our stock that are owned beneficially and of record by the shareholder and, if applicable, the beneficial owner, including the holding period for such shares as of the date of the recommendation;
|
·
|
full biographical information concerning the director candidate, including a statement about the director’s qualifications;
|
·
|
all other information regarding each director candidate proposed by such shareholder as would be required to be included in a proxy statement filed pursuant to the proxy rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission;
|
·
|
description of all arrangements or understandings among the shareholder and the candidate and any other person or persons pursuant to which the recommendation is being made;
|
·
|
description of all relationships between the candidate and any of our competitors, customers, suppliers, labor unions or other persons with special interests regarding us; and
|
·
|
a written consent of the candidate to be named in our proxy statement and stand for election if nominated by the Board of Directors and to serve if elected by the shareholders.
|
Recommendations must be sent to the Chairman of the Nominating/Governance Committee c/o the Secretary, EnSync, Inc., N93 W14475 Whittaker Way, Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin 53051. Once the Nominating/Governance Committee receives a recommendation for a director candidate, such candidate will be evaluated in the same manner as other candidates and a recommendation with respect to such candidate will be delivered to the Board of Directors. The submission of a recommendation by a shareholder in compliance with these procedures will not guarantee the selection of the shareholder’s candidate or the inclusion of the candidate in the proxy statement for the annual meeting. A shareholder wishing to formally nominate a candidate (as opposed to recommending a candidate for nomination by the Board as described above) must do so by following the procedures set forth in our Amended and Restated By-laws (“Bylaws”).
|
Policy Governing Director Attendance at Annual Meetings of Shareholders
|
Our policy is to schedule a regular meeting of the Board of Directors on the same date as our annual meeting of shareholders and, accordingly, directors are encouraged to be present at such shareholder meetings. All of our then-current board members attended the 2014 annual meeting of shareholders.
Our Board of Directors adopted a Code of Business Conduct. The Code of Business Conduct, in accordance with Section 406 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 and Item 406 of Regulation S-K, constitutes our Code of Ethics. The Code of Business Conduct codifies the business and ethical principles that govern our business.
The Code of Business Conduct is designed, among other things, to deter wrongdoing and to promote:
·
|
Honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;
|
·
|
Compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;
|
·
|
The prompt internal reporting violations of the ethics code to an appropriate person or persons identified in the code of ethics; and
|
·
|
Accountability for adherence to the Code.
|
Our Code of Business Conduct has historically been posted and is available on our website at
www.ensync.com
. Additionally, this Code of Business Conduct is provided to all directors, officers and all other personnel upon joining the Company, and thereafter from time-to-time to any person, upon request, and without charge. A copy may also be obtained, free of charge, from us upon a request directed to EnSync, Inc., N93 W14475 Whittaker Way, Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin 53051, attention: Investor Relations. We intend to disclose any amendments to or waivers of a provision of the code of ethics by posting such information on our website available at
www.ensync.com
or in our public filings with the SEC.
For more corporate governance information, you are invited to access the Corporate Governance section of our website available at
www.ensync.com
.
The Board of Directors and Its Committees
Our Bylaws state that the number of directors constituting the entire Board of Directors shall be determined by resolution of the Board and that the Board has the authority to increase the number of directors, fill any vacancies on the Board and to decrease the number of directors to eliminate any vacancies. The number of directors currently fixed by our Board of Directors is eight.
The Board of Directors has standing audit, compensation, and nominating/governance committees. The Board of Directors held 9 regular and special meetings during fiscal 2015. Each director attended at least 75% of the full board meetings and meetings of committees on which he served during fiscal 2015 except for Mr. Abdoo, who was unable to attend a number of meetings due to health reasons.
The Board of Directors and each standing committee retains the authority to engage its own advisors and consultants. Each standing committee has a charter that has been approved by the Board of Directors. A copy of each committee charter is available at
www.ensync.com
. Each committee reviews the appropriateness of its charter annually or at such other intervals as each committee determines.
The following table sets forth the current members of each standing committee of the Board:
Audit: James H. Ozanne (Chairman)
Richard A. Abdoo
Manfred E. Birnbaum
Paul F. Koeppe
Theodore Stern
Compensation: Manfred E. Birnbaum (Chairman)
Richard A. Abdoo
Paul F. Koeppe
James H. Ozanne
Theodore Stern
Nominating/Governance: Richard A. Abdoo (Chairman)
Manfred E. Birnbaum
Paul F. Koeppe
James H. Ozanne
Theodore Stern
The Audit Committee (1) reviews, monitors and reports to the Board of Directors on the adequacy of the Company’s financial reporting process and system of internal controls over financial reporting, (2) has the ultimate authority to select, evaluate and replace the independent auditor and is the ultimate authority to which the independent auditors are accountable, (3) provides the audit committee report for inclusion in our proxy statement for our annual meeting of shareholders and (4) establishes procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints relating to accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters and the receipt of confidential, anonymous submissions by employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. The Audit Committee is required at all times to be composed exclusively of directors who, in the opinion of our Board of Directors, are free from any relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment as a committee member and who possess an understanding of financial statements and generally accepted accounting principles. We believe that all the members of the Audit Committee are independent directors as required by the listing requirements for the NYSE MKT. Our Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Koeppe qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined under Item 407(d) of Regulation S-K. The Audit Committee met 4 times during fiscal 2015.
The Compensation Committee (1) discharges the responsibilities of the Board of Directors relating to the compensation of our directors and executive officers, including approving individual executive officer compensation, (2) review and recommend to the Board of Directors compensation plans, policies and programs, (3) administers and implements the Company’s incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans, and (4) provides the compensation committee report for inclusion in our proxy statement for our annual meeting of shareholders. The Compensation Committee met 5 times during fiscal 2015.
The Nominating/Governance Committee (1) recommends to the Board of Directors persons to serve as members of the Board of Directors and as members of and chairpersons for the committees of the Board of Directors, (2) considers the recommendation of candidates to serve as directors submitted the shareholders of the Company, (3) assists the Board of Directors in evaluating the performance of the Board of Directors and the Board committees, (4) advises the Board of Directors regarding the appropriate board leadership structure for the Company, (5) reviews and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors on corporate governance and (6) reviews the size and composition of the Board of Directors and recommends to the Board of Directors any changes it deems advisable. The composition of the Board of Directors should encompass a broad range of skills, expertise, industry knowledge and diversity of opinion. The Nominating/Governance Committee met twice during fiscal 2015.
|
Shareholder Communications with the Board
|
Shareholders wishing to communicate with members of the Board of Directors may direct correspondence to such individuals c/o Dilek Wagner, Secretary, N93 W14475 Whittaker Way, Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin 53051.
All communications received in accordance with these procedures will be reviewed by the Secretary of the Company and forwarded to the appropriate director or directors unless such communications are considered, in the reasonable judgment of the Secretary, to be improper for submission to the intended recipient. Examples of shareholder communications that would be considered improper for submission include, without limitation, communications that:
·
|
do not relate to the business or affairs of the Corporation or the functioning or constitution of the Board of Directors or any of its committees;
|
·
|
relate to routine or insignificant matters that do not warrant the attention of the Board of Directors;
|
·
|
are advertisements or other commercial solicitations;
|
·
|
are frivolous or offensive; or
|
·
|
are otherwise not appropriate for delivery to directors.
|
|
Role of the Board of Directors in Risk Oversight
|
The Board of Directors administers its risk oversight function directly and through the Audit Committee. The Board of Directors and the Audit Committee regularly discuss with management the Company’s major risk exposures, their potential financial impact on the Company, and the steps taken to monitor and control those risks.
Audit Committee Report
The Audit Committee of the Company has:
·
|
reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 with management;
|
·
|
discussed with Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP, our independent auditors (“Baker Tilly”), the matters required to be discussed by the Auditing Standard No. 16, “Communications with Audit Committees,” as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States);
|
·
|
received the written disclosures and the letter from Baker Tilly required by Independent Standards Board Standard No. 1,
Independence Discussions with Audit Committees
; and
|
·
|
discussed with Baker Tilly the auditors’ independence.
|
Based on these reviews and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that that the audited financial statements be included in the annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015.
Respectfully submitted by the Audit Committee.
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE:
James H. Ozanne, Chairman
Richard A. Abdoo
Manfred E. Birnbaum
Paul F. Koeppe
Theodore Stern
EXECUTIVE AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Our compensation philosophy is to offer our executive officers compensation and benefits that are competitive and meet our goals of attracting, retaining and motivating highly skilled management, which is necessary to achieve our financial and strategic objectives and create long-term value for our shareholders. We believe the levels of compensation we provide should be competitive, reasonable and appropriate for our business needs and circumstances. The principal elements of our executive compensation program have to date included base salary, and long-term equity compensation in the form of restricted stock or stock options. We believe successful long term Company performance is more critical to enhancing shareholder value than short term results. For this reason and to conserve cash and better align the interests of management and our shareholders, we emphasize long-term performance-based equity compensation over base annual salaries.
Summary Compensation Table For 2015
The following table represents summary information regarding the compensation of each of Bradley L. Hansen, our President and Chief Executive Officer, Daniel A. Nordloh, our Executive Vice President of Global Business Development, and Eric C. Apfelbach, our former Chief Executive Officer (the “named executive officers”), for fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014.
Name and Principal Position
|
Year
|
|
Salary ($)
|
|
|
Bonus ($)
|
|
|
Stock Awards ($)(1)
|
|
|
Option Awards ($)(2)
|
|
|
All Other Compensation ($)(3)
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
Bradley L. Hansen
(4)
|
2015
|
|
|
245,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
608,400
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
58,877
|
|
|
|
912,277
|
|
President and Chief
|
2014
|
|
|
29,212
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
452,539
|
|
|
|
4,318
|
|
|
|
486,069
|
|
Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel A. Nordloh
|
2015
|
|
|
190,115
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
85,221
|
|
|
|
17,754
|
|
|
|
293,090
|
|
Executive Vice President of
|
2014
|
|
|
180,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10,490
|
|
|
|
18,277
|
|
|
|
208,767
|
|
Global Business Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eric C. Apfelbach
|
2015
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
34,400
|
|
|
|
334,400
|
|
Former Chief Executive Officer
|
2014
|
|
|
250,961
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
820,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
35,500
|
|
|
|
1,106,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The amounts shown in this column indicate the full grant date fair value of restricted stock unit awards (“RSUs”) computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“FASB ASC Topic 718”), excluding the effect of the forfeitures. For additional information regarding the assumptions made in calculating these amounts, see the Notes to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. These amounts reflect our accounting expense for these awards and do not correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by the named executive officers.
|
(2)
|
The amounts shown in this column indicate the full grant date fair value of option awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Generally, the full grant date fair value is the amount that we would expense in our financial statements over the award’s vesting schedule. For additional information regarding the assumptions made in calculating these amounts, see the Notes to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. These amounts reflect our accounting expense for these awards and do not correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by the named executive officers.
|
(3)
|
The amounts set forth in this column consisted of (i) disability insurance reimbursement, (ii) health insurance payments, (iii) matching contributions to our 401(k) Plan, (iv) car allowance and commuting expense reimbursement, and (v) apartment lease reimbursement as follows:
|
|
Year
|
|
Disability
Insurance ($)
|
|
Health
Insurance ($)
|
|
Matching Contribution
to 401(k) Plan ($)
|
|
Commuting Expense
Reimbursement ($)
|
|
Apartment Lease
Reimbursement ($)
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
Bradley Hansen
|
2015
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
28,057
|
|
|
30,820
|
|
|
58,877
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
4,318
|
|
|
4,318
|
|
Daniel A. Nordloh
|
2015
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
7,605
|
|
|
10,149
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
17,754
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
7,158
|
|
|
11,119
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
18,277
|
|
Eric C. Apfelbach
|
2015
|
|
|
6,768
|
|
|
3,641
|
|
|
7,392
|
|
|
16,599
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
34,400
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
8,243
|
|
|
2,952
|
|
|
15,008
|
|
|
9,298
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
35,500
|
|
(4)
|
Mr. Hansen joined the Company in May 2014.
|
Outstanding Equity Awards at June 30, 2015
The following table presents information about unexercised options that were held by the named executive officers as of June 30, 2015.
|
Options Awards
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
Name
|
Number of Securities Underlying
Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable
|
Number of Securities Underlying
Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable
|
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)
|
Option Exercise Price ($)
|
Option Expiration Date
|
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights that Have Not Vested (#)
|
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(1)
|
Bradley L. Hansen
|
120,000
|
240,000
|
(2)
|
-
|
|
1.72
|
07/03/20
|
90,000
|
72,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel A. Nordloh
|
-
|
-
|
|
120,000
|
|
1.02
|
09/16/22
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
-
|
|
14,000
|
|
0.78
|
11/05/21
|
|
|
|
2,667
|
1,333
|
|
-
|
|
1.90
|
09/06/20
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
3.80
|
01/11/20
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
4.55
|
08/29/19
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
3.75
|
04/29/18
|
|
|
Eric C. Apfelbach
|
20,000
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
4.35
|
08/09/19
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
2.45
|
06/30/18
|
|
|
|
80,000
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
6.65
|
01/07/18
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
6.65
|
12/31/15
|
|
|
__________
(1)
|
The market value of shares of restricted stock units is based on the closing price of our common stock on June 30, 2015 ($0.80).
|
(2)
|
Reflects the unvested portion of an option grant which vests in two equal annual installments beginning July 3, 2016.
|
Employment Agreements
On May 19, 2014, Bradley L. Hansen entered into an employment agreement with us as our President and Chief Operating Officer and as a member of our Board of Directors which provides for a minimum base salary of $245,000. Pursuant to the employment agreement, in May 2014 Mr. Hansen was awarded an inducement option grant to purchase 360,000 shares of common stock that vests in three annual installments beginning on May 19, 2015 and in July 2014 he was awarded 360,000 restricted stock units that vest subject to the satisfaction of certain performance-based vesting requirements. The per share exercise price of the options is $1.72 which was the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE MKT on May 19, 2014.
Mr. Hansen’s employment agreement was amended on July 13, 2015 in connection with his appointment as Chief Executive Officer to increase his annual salary to $300,000 per year and extend the initial term until June 30, 2019. Additionally, the July 13, 2015 amendment provides that, subject to receipt of shareholder approval for any required increase in authorized shares under the Company’s articles of incorporation and/or equity plans, Mr. Hansen will receive a restricted stock unit award covering 1,500,000 shares of our common stock. The restricted stock units will vest in full upon the completion of 40 megawatts worth of Projects (as defined in the Supply Agreement between the Company and Solar Power, Inc.); provided that upon Mr. Hansen’s termination without Cause, for Good Reason, Disability (each, as defined in Mr. Hansen’s employment agreement), or for death on or before June 30, 2019, a portion of the restricted stock units shall vest equal to the portion of the series C convertible preferred stock that have become convertible on or before such termination.
If we terminate Mr. Hansen’s employment agreement for any reason other than for Cause or Disability (each as defined in the employment agreement) or Mr. Hansen terminates his employment for Good Reason (as defined in the employment agreement), or he dies, we must pay him a severance payment in an amount equal to the greater of (i) six months of his annual base salary as then in effect and (ii) payment of his base salary as then in effect for the remainder of the Term (as defined in the employment agreement), and he is entitled to certain benefits under COBRA. Additionally, if we terminate Mr. Hansen’s employment agreement for any reason other than for Cause (as defined in the employment agreement) or Mr. Hansen terminates his employment for Good Reason or Disability (each as defined in the employment agreement), or he dies, and such termination occurs before June 30, 2019, Mr. Hansen’s July 2015 1,500,000 restricted stock unit award that is subject to performance-based vesting conditions will vest as follows: the number of restricted stock units earned shall equal the product of (A) 1,500,000 and (B) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of shares of shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company that have become eligible for conversion prior to such termination, and the denominator of which is 28,048. If his employment agreement is terminated for Disability, Mr. Hansen will be entitled to a severance payment in an amount equal to six months of his annual base salary as then in effect. Furthermore, Mr. Hansen will forfeit any options that have not vested at the time of termination for any reason, except that (i) upon a change of control, the options shall become immediately exercisable and fully vested and (ii) upon termination without Cause or due to Disability or upon resignation for Good Reason (as defined in the employment agreement), an additional 60,000 shares will become fully vested and exercisable.
On September 30, 2014, Eric C. Apfelbach entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with us to act as our Chief Executive Officer, which provided for a minimum base salary of $250,000. Pursuant to his original employment agreement dated January 7, 2010, Mr. Apfelbach was awarded an inducement option grant to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock that vested over the two year period ending December 31, 2012. The per share exercise price of the options is $6.65 which was the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE MKT on January 7, 2010. On July 13, 2015, Mr. Apfelbach’s employment agreement was terminated and he was appointed Vice Chairman. In connection with his appointment as Vice Chairman, Mr. Apfelbach was granted a stock option grant covering 75,000 shares of common stock that vests in three equal annual installments and he entered into a Professional Services Agreement with the Company pursuant to which he will provide certain consulting services to the Company and will be paid at an hourly rate commensurate with the salary he was receiving under his employment agreement.
On September 30, 2014, Daniel A. Nordloh entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with us to act as our Executive Vice President of Global Business Development which provides for a minimum base salary of $190,000. Pursuant to his original letter agreement dated April 29, 2010, Mr. Nordloh was awarded an option grant to purchase 20,000 shares of common stock that vested over the three-year period ending April 29, 2013. The per share exercise price is $3.75 which was the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE MKT on April 29, 2010.
If we terminate Mr. Nordloh’s employment agreement for any reason other than Cause or Disability (each as defined in the employment agreement) or Mr. Nordloh terminates his employment for Good Reason (as defined in the employment agreement) or Mr. Nordloh dies, we must pay him a severance payment in an amount equal to three months of his annual base salary as then in effect, and he is entitled to certain benefits under COBRA. If we terminate Mr. Nordloh’s employment agreement for Disability, we must pay him a severance payment in an amount equal to three months of his base salary as then in effect, and he is entitled to certain benefits under COBRA.
As a condition of these employment agreements, Mr. Apfelbach, Mr. Hansen and Mr. Nordloh each entered into a restrictive covenant agreement with the Company. Each restrictive covenant agreement contains, among other terms, covenants prohibiting the officer from competing with the Company during his employment and at any time during the 24 months following termination for any reason and a requirement for him to keep all confidential information of the Company strictly confidential during his employment and for a period of 24 months after termination of employment.
Director Compensation
|
2015 Compensation Policy for Non-Employee Directors
|
On November 6, 2013
the Board of Directors adopted the following compensation policy for members of the Board of Directors who are not officers or employees of the Company (“non-employee directors”):
·
|
An annual retainer in the amount of $72,000, payable as follows. The annual retainer for a non-employee director for a year will be awarded as of the date of the annual meeting of shareholders of the Company (the “Annual Meeting”) in the form of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) under the Company’s 2012 Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation Plan (or any successor plan thereto) (the “Stock Plan”). The RSUs will have the following terms and conditions: (A) the number of RSUs will be determined by dividing the dollar amount of the award by the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the first business day preceding the Annual Meeting, rounded up to the next whole share; (B) 25% of the RSUs will vest on the date of grant, and the remaining RSUs will vest 25% each on March 31, June 30 and September 30 following the Annual Meeting, provided the non-employee director remains in continuous service with the Board through the applicable vesting date; (C) the RSUs will vest earlier in the event of a “Change in Control” of the Company (as defined in the Stock Plan); (D) except in the case of Mr. Birnbaum’s RSUs, vested RSUs will be payable upon the earlier of (x) the date that is six months after the non-employee director “separates from service” with the Board (within the meaning of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code) or (y) the date of a Change in Control (provided that the Change in Control is a permissible “change in control” payment event within the meaning of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code); (E) Mr. Birnbaum’s vested RSUs will be payable on vesting; (F) vested RSUs will be payable in the form of one share of common stock of the Company for each vested RSU then payable; and (G) the RSUs will otherwise be subject to the terms of the Stock Plan and will be evidenced by an appropriate RSU award agreement.
|
·
|
In addition, an annual Chairman’s retainer in the following amounts, payable in cash quarterly in arrears: $30,000 for the Chairman of the Board; $12,000 for the Chairman of the Audit Committee and for the Chairman of the Compensation Committee; and $8,000 for the Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee.
|
·
|
In addition, an annual committee membership fee in the amount of $6,000 for each committee of the Board on which the non-employee director serves, payable in cash quarterly in arrears, provided the non-employee director remains in continuous service with the Board through each applicable payment date.
|
An employee of the Company who serves as a director receives no additional compensation for such service.
Non-Employee Director Compensation in 2015
The following table provides compensation information for the one-year period ended June 30, 2015 for each non-employee member of our Board of Directors.
Name
|
|
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash ($)
|
|
|
Stock Awards
($)(1)(2)
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
Richard A. Abdoo
|
|
|
26,000
|
|
|
|
72,000
|
|
|
|
98,000
|
|
Manfred E. Birnbaum
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
72,000
|
|
|
|
102,000
|
|
Paul F. Koeppe
|
|
|
48,000
|
|
|
|
72,000
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
James H. Ozanne
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
72,000
|
|
|
|
102,000
|
|
Theodore Stern
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
72,000
|
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
Name
|
|
Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised Options
|
|
|
Number of Securities Underlying
Restricted Stock Unit Awards
|
|
Richard A. Abdoo
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
319,684
|
|
Manfred E. Birnbaum
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
149,230
|
|
Paul F. Koeppe
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
358,098
|
|
James H. Ozanne
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
266,552
|
|
Theodore Stern
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
203,640
|
|
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
We maintain the following equity compensation plan under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance to our employees and/or directors: the 2010 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan; and the 2012 Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation Plan. We also maintain the following three equity compensation plans, which are frozen and under which no new grants will be made: the 2002 Stock Option Plan, the Employee Stock Option Scheme, and the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan. Each of the foregoing equity compensation plans was approved by our shareholders. The following table presents information about these plans as of June 30, 2015.
Plan Category
|
|
Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of outstanding
options, warrants and rights
|
|
|
Weighted average exercise
price of outstanding options,
warrants and rights
|
|
|
Number of securities
remaining available for future issuance
under equity compensation plans
(excluding securities outstanding)
|
|
Equity compensation plans
approved by security holders
|
|
|
2,816,813
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
2.29
|
(2)
|
|
|
1,704,933
|
(3)
|
Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders
|
|
|
882,000
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
2.83
|
|
|
None
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,698,813
|
|
|
$
|
2.42
|
|
|
|
1,704,933
|
|
(1)
|
Includes 1,936,035 outstanding restricted stock units under plans approved by our security holders.
|
(2)
|
Does not reflect restricted stock units included in the first column that do not have an exercise price.
|
(3)
|
Represents shares available for issuance under our 2010 Omnibus Long-term Incentive Plan and 2012 Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation Plan.
|
(4)
|
Consists of inducement option grants awarded to Mr. Apfelbach in connection with his hiring in January 2010, members of management of Tier Electronics LLC in connection with its acquisition in January 2011, Mr. Siebert in connection with his hiring in August 2012 and Mr. Hansen in connection with his hiring in May 2014. The material terms of Mr. Apfelbach’s inducement option grants are described above under
EXECUTIVE AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION – EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS
. In connection with our acquisition of Tier Electronics LLC in January 2011 we issued inducement option grants to purchase a total of 150,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $5.75 of which 122,000 remained outstanding at June 30, 2015. In connection with his hiring, we awarded Mr. Siebert an inducement option grant to purchase 30,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.90 that provided for vesting as follows: one-third on August 24, 2013 and the balance in 24 monthly installments beginning on September 24, 2013 and ending on August 24, 2015. The material terms of Mr. Hansen’s inducement option grants are described above under EXECUTIVE AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION – EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS.
|
PROPOSAL 2 – ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Proposal
We are providing our shareholders with the opportunity to express their views on our named executive officers’ compensation by casting their vote on this Proposal 2. This non-binding, advisory vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers as described in this proxy statement.
At our annual meeting of shareholders for 2014, 89% of the votes cast on the non-binding, advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers were voted in favor of the proposal. The compensation committee believes this affirms the shareholders’ support of our approach to executive compensation.
Our executive compensation program, which is described in detail in the “Executive and Director Compensation” section beginning on page 15, is intended to offer our executive officers compensation and benefits that are competitive and meet our goals of attracting, retaining and motivating highly skilled management, which is necessary to achieve our financial and strategic objectives and create long-term value for our shareholders. We believe that our executive compensation program accomplishes these goals in a way that is consistent with our purpose and core values and the long-term interests of the Company and its shareholders.
Although the vote on this Proposal 2 regarding the compensation of our named executive officers is not binding, we value the opinions of our shareholders and will consider the result of the vote when determining future executive compensation arrangements.
If this proposal is approved, our shareholders will be approving the following resolution:
RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K in the Company’s proxy statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, is hereby approved.
Vote Required for Approval
The affirmative vote of a majority of the total votes cast on the foregoing resolution by the holders of our common stock and series B convertible preferred stock, voting together on a combined basis, is required to approve, on an advisory basis, such resolution. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the proposal.
Board Recommendation
The Board recommends a vote “
FOR
” this Proposal 2.
PROPOSAL 3—APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, AS AMENDED
TO DATE, TO INCREASE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES OF COMMON STOCK
General
Our Board is seeking shareholder approval of an amendment to our Articles of Incorporation which would increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 150,000,000 to 300,000,000. The proposed amendment to the Articles of Incorporation (the “Articles of Amendment”) is attached hereto as Appendix A.
The newly authorized shares of common stock would have the same rights as the currently outstanding shares of our common stock. As of September 30, 2015, 47,157,459 shares of our common stock were issued and outstanding, 1,936,034 shares were reserved for issuance pursuant to outstanding restricted stock unit awards, 1,655,778 shares were reserved for issuance pursuant to outstanding stock option awards, 1,067,287 shares were reserved for future issuance under our equity compensation plans, 52,927,952 shares were reserved for issuance upon the exercise of outstanding stock purchase warrants, 42,000,600 shares were reserved for issuance upon the conversion of outstanding series C convertible preferred stock and 3,254,890 shares were reserved for issuance upon the conversion of outstanding series B convertible preferred stock. Accordingly, all 150,000,000 authorized shares of our common stock are currently issued or reserved and none remain available for future issuance.
Reasons for the Increase in Authorized Shares
The Board believes that the increase in authorized shares would be beneficial for the following reasons:
|
·
|
Ensure that an adequate number of shares are available for potential future corporate purposes.
An increase in the number of authorized shares of our common stock enables us to have a sufficient number of shares available for a variety of possible future corporate purposes, including but not limited to raising additional capital through future equity transactions and issuance of stock under the Omnibus Plan and 2012 Director Equity Plan including, specifically,(i) the awards anticipated to be issued under the Omnibus Plan as described below in “
Anticipated Awards if the Omnibus Plan Amendment is Approved
” in Proposal 4 of this Proxy Statement and (ii) the awards anticipated to be issued under the 2012 Director Equity Plan as described below in “
New Plan Benefits
” in Proposal 5 of this Proxy Statement if this Proposal 3, Proposal 4 and Proposal 5 are approved by the Company’s shareholders. However, other than issuance of stock under the Omnibus Plan and 2012 Director Equity Plan, we have no plans, arrangements or understandings to issue any of the newly authorized shares for any purpose at this time.
|
|
·
|
Enable equity transactions to raise additional capital.
The availability of additional shares of our common stock will permit us to raise capital through equity transactions. Any such additional capital may be used for a variety of purposes including general corporate and working capital purposes. However, we have no plans, arrangements or understandings for any equity transactions at this time.
|
Potential Anti-Takeover Effect
An increase in the number of authorized shares of common stock could have the effect of making it more difficult for a third-party to engage in a merger, tender offer or proxy contest or assume control of a large voting block of our common stock. The authorized but unissued shares of common stock could be used by our Board of Directors to discourage, delay or make more difficult a change in the control of the Company. For example, our Board of Directors could implement a rights plan or similar arrangement pursuant to which shares of common stock would be issued to other stockholders on highly-dilutive terms if the party seeking to acquire control of the Company has purchased a substantial amount of common stock, or such additional shares could be privately placed with purchasers who might align themselves with our Board of Directors in opposing a hostile takeover bid. At present, neither the Company’s Articles of Incorporation nor Bylaws contain provisions having an anti-takeover effect, the Company does not have plans or proposals to adopt other provisions or enter into other arrangements that may have material anti-takeover consequences, and the Board of Directors did not adopt the Articles of Amendment with the intent that it be utilized as a type of anti-takeover device.
Implementation of the Authorized Share Increase
Following shareholder approval of this proposal, the authorized share increase would be implemented by our filing the Articles of Amendment with the Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions. However, at any time prior to the effectiveness of the filing of the Articles of Amendment with the Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions, the Board of Directors reserves the right to abandon this proposal and to not file the Articles of Amendment, even if approved by the shareholders of the Company, if the Board of Directors, in its discretion, determines that such amendment is no longer in the best interests of the Company or its shareholders.
Vote Required for Approval
The following votes of our shareholders are required for approval of this proposal: (1) the affirmative vote of at least three quarters of the votes cast by the common shareholders, (2) the affirmative vote of at least three quarters of the votes cast by the holders of our common stock and series B convertible preferred stock voting together on a combined basis and (3) the affirmative vote of at least three quarters of the votes cast by the holders of our common stock and series C convertible preferred stock voting together on a combined basis. Abstentions will not be counted as voting and, therefore, will have no impact on the approval of the proposal. Broker non-votes are not expected not occur in connection with this proposal.
Board Recommendation
The Board recommends that the shareholders vote
FOR
the approval of the amendment to the Articles of Incorporation.
PROPOSAL 4—APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO
ENSYNC, INC. 2010 OMNIBUS LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
(FORMERLY THE ZBB ENERGY CORPORATION 2010 OMNIBUS LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN);
APPROVAL OF CODE SECTION 162(m) LIMITS AND CRITERIA
General
On August 26, 2010, our Board of Directors originally adopted the 2010 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended by that certain Amendment No. 1 approved by the Company’s shareholders at its 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on November 7, 2012 and Amendment No. 2 approved by the Company’s shareholders at its 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on November 18, 2014 (the “Omnibus Plan”). As of September 30, 2015, approximately 684,001 shares remained available for issuance under the Omnibus Plan. Our Board of Directors has determined that this remaining amount is insufficient to meet the Company’s equity compensation requirements.
On
September 17, 2015, our Board of Directors approved Amendment No. 3 to the Omnibus Plan described in this proposal (the “Omnibus Plan Amendment”), subject to shareholder approval. If approved by the shareholders, the Omnibus Plan Amendment will increase the number of shares of the Company’s common stock available for issuance under the Omnibus Plan by 5,000,000 shares. Notwithstanding shareholder approval of this Proposal 4, if Proposal 3 (the Authorized Share Increase Proposal) discussed above is not approved by the Company’s shareholders, the Board of Directors may elect not to implement the Omnibus Plan Amendment until a sufficient number of shares of the Company’s common stock have been authorized under the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to allow the Company to issue the shares reserved under the Omnibus Plan as amended by the Omnibus Plan Amendment.
We are also asking shareholders to approve increased individual award limits, and to re-approve business criteria that can be used in establishing performance goals for performance awards granted under the Omnibus Plan, in each case as described in this Proposal 4, for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).
A copy of the Omnibus Plan Amendment is attached as Appendix B to this Proxy Statement. The material terms of the Omnibus Plan, assuming the approval of the Omnibus Plan Amendment, are summarized below under the heading “Material Features of the Omnibus Plan.” This summary of the Omnibus Plan is not intended to be a complete description of the Omnibus Plan and is qualified in its entirety by the actual text of the Omnibus Plan, which is attached as Appendix A to the Company’s proxy statement for the Company’s 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, filed with the SEC on September 24, 2010; Appendix A to the Company’s proxy statement for the 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, filed with the SEC on September 25, 2012; and Appendix A to the Company’s proxy statement for the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, filed with the SEC on October 9, 2014.
Reasons for the Amendment
The purpose of the Omnibus Plan Amendment is to provide the Company with sufficient flexibility to continue to use the Omnibus Plan to further the Company’s compensation philosophy and programs. Our Board of Directors believes that the interests of the Company and its shareholders will be advanced if we can continue to offer our officers, non-employee directors, key employees, consultants and advisors the opportunity to acquire or increase a direct ownership interest in the operations and future success of the Company. In addition, the ability to obtain and retain new quality personnel by offering competitive compensation is of great importance to the success of the Company. However, our Board of Directors has determined that the current number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the Omnibus Plan is insufficient for the stated objectives of the Omnibus Plan. The Omnibus Plan Amendment will increase the number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the Omnibus Plan by 5,000,000 shares.
Material Features of the Omnibus Plan
|
Administration of the Plan
|
Our Board of Directors has such powers and authorities related to the administration of the Omnibus Plan as are consistent with our corporate governance documents and applicable law. Pursuant to its charter, the Omnibus Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee (the “Administrator”).
The following types of awards are available for grant under the Omnibus Plan: Incentive Stock Options (“ISOs”), Non-qualified Stock Options (“NSOs”), Stock Appreciation Rights (“SARs”), Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, cash- or stock-based Performance awards (each as defined in the Omnibus Plan) and other stock-based awards.
|
Number of Authorized Shares
|
If shareholders approve the Omnibus Plan Amendment, subject to adjustment (in connection with certain changes in capitalization), the total number of shares of our common stock that will be reserved for issuance under the Omnibus Plan will be 5,789,001, all of which will be available for issuance under ISOs.
If shareholders approve the Omnibus Plan Amendment, the maximum number of each type of award (other than cash-based Performance awards (as defined in the Omnibus Plan)) intended to constitute “performance-based compensation” under Code Section 162(m) (“Section 162(m)”) granted to any grantee in any 36-month period may not exceed the following:
|
·
|
Restricted Stock—3,000,000;
|
|
·
|
Restricted Stock Units—3,000,000; and
|
|
·
|
Other Stock-based Performance awards—3,000,000.
|
Shareholders are being asked to approve the foregoing increased limits (which currently are each 2,225,000) for purposes of Section 162(m) under this Proposal 4.
We currently do not anticipate issuing awards in amounts that will cause us to use more than approximately one-third of the remaining available shares in any fiscal year. As a result we anticipate that the number of shares reserved for awards under the Omnibus Plan will be sufficient to cover our equity awards for at least fiscal 2016, 2017 and 2018.
Shares of our Common Stock underlying any outstanding stock Option or other awards granted under our 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (formerly known as the ZBB Energy Corporation 2007 Equity Incentive Plan) or any other predecessor employee Omnibus Plan of the Company that are forfeited, terminated or cancelled for any reason without issuance of such shares shall be available for the grant of new awards under the Omnibus Plan. If any award under the Omnibus Plan expires, or is terminated, surrendered or forfeited, in whole or in part, or the shares of Common Stock are not delivered because the award is settled in cash or used to satisfy the applicable tax withholding obligations, the unissued shares of our Common Stock covered by such award shall again be available for the grant of awards under the Omnibus Plan. If shares of our Common Stock issued pursuant to the Omnibus Plan are repurchased by, or are surrendered or forfeited to the Company at no more than cost, such shares of our Common Stock shall again be available for the grant of awards under the Omnibus Plan. In addition, in the case of any Substitute award (as defined in the Omnibus Plan), such Substitute award shall not be counted against the number of shares reserved under the Omnibus Plan.
|
Eligibility and Participation
|
Eligibility to participate in the Omnibus Plan is limited to such employees, officers, non-employee directors, consultants and advisors of the Company, or of any affiliate, as the Administrator may determine and designate from time to time. As of September 30, 2015, approximately 59 employees, five executive officers, seven non-employee directors and one consultant would have been eligible to receive awards under the Omnibus Plan.
New Plan Benefits.
We cannot currently determine the total benefits or number of shares subject to awards that may be granted in the future under the Omnibus Plan. However, in accordance with Mr. Hansen’s July 2015 employment agreement amendment, if the Omnibus Plan Amendment is approved by the shareholders, Bradley L. Hansen, our President and Chief Executive Officer, will receive a restricted stock unit award covering 1,500,000 shares of our common stock. In addition, pursuant to an employment agreement entered into with a non-executive officer in August 2015, if the Omnibus Plan Amendment is approved by the shareholders, this employee will receive a restricted stock unit award covering 340,000 shares of our common stock and an option award covering 360,000 shares of our common stock. The following table sets forth information concerning these anticipated awards under the Omnibus Plan:
Name and Position
|
Number of RSUs
(#)
|
Number of Options
(#)
|
Bradley L. Hanson, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
1,500,000 (1)
|
-
|
Executive Group
|
1,500,000 (1)
|
-
|
Non-Executive Officer Employee Group
|
340,000 (2)
|
360,000 (3)
|
__________
(1)
|
Comprises a restricted stock unit award expected to be granted to Mr. Hansen.
These restricted stock units will vest in full upon the completion of 40 megawatts worth of Projects (as defined in the Supply Agreement between the Company and Solar Power, Inc.); provided that upon Mr. Hansen’s termination without Cause, for Good Reason, Disability (each, as defined in Mr. Hansen’s employment agreement), or for death on or before June 30, 2019, a portion of the restricted stock units shall vest equal to the portion of the series C convertible preferred stock that have become convertible on or before such termination.
|
(2)
|
These RSUs will vest in full on the fourth anniversary of the employment start date, subject to continued employment on the applicable vesting date.
|
(3)
|
These options will vest in three equal annual installments, subject to continued employment on the applicable vesting date.
|
Grant of Options and SARs.
The Administrator may award ISOs, NSOs (each, an “Option”, and together, “Options”), and SARs to grantees under the Omnibus Plan. SARs may be awarded either in tandem with or as a component of other awards or alone.
Exercise Price of Options and SARs.
The exercise price per share of an Option will be at least 100% of the fair market value per share of our stock underlying the award on the grant date. A SAR will confer on the grantee a right to receive, upon exercise, a payment of the excess of (1) the fair market value of one share of our stock on the date of exercise over (2) the grant price of the SAR as determined by the Administrator. The grant price will be fixed at the fair market value of a share of stock on the date of grant. SARs granted in tandem with an outstanding Option following the grant date of such Option will have a grant price that is equal to the Option’s exercise price; provided, however, that the SAR’s grant price may not be less than the fair market value of a share of stock on the grant date of the SAR.
Vesting of Options and SARs.
The Administrator will determine the terms and conditions (including any performance requirements) under which an Option or SAR will become exercisable and will include such information in the award agreement.
Special Limitations on ISOs.
In the case of a grant of an Option intended to qualify as an ISO to a grantee that owns more than ten percent of the total combined voting power of all classes of our outstanding stock (a “Ten Percent Shareholder”), the exercise price of the Option will not be less than 110% of the fair market value of a share of our stock on the grant date. Additionally, an Option will constitute an ISO only (1) if the grantee is an employee of the Company or a subsidiary of the Company, (2) to the extent such Option is specifically designated as an ISO in the related award agreement, and (3) to the extent that the aggregate fair market value (determined at the time the Option is granted) of the shares of stock with respect to which all ISOs held by such grantee become exercisable for the first time during any calendar year (under the Omnibus Plan and all other plans of the grantee’s employer and its affiliates) does not exceed $100,000.
Exercise of Options and SARs.
An Option may be exercised by the delivery to us of written notice of exercise and payment in full of the exercise price (plus the amount of any taxes which we may be required to withhold). The Administrator has the discretion to determine the method or methods by which a SAR may be exercised.
Expiration of Options and SARs.
Options and SARs will expire at such times as the Administrator determines; provided, however, that no Option may be exercised more than 10 years from the date of grant, or in the case of an ISO held by a Ten Percent Shareholder, not more than five years from the date of grant.
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units
Restricted Stock.
At the time a grant of Restricted Stock is made, the Administrator may establish the applicable “restricted period” and prescribe restrictions in addition to or other than the expiration of the restricted period, including the satisfaction of corporate or individual performance objectives. Unless the Administrator otherwise provides in an award agreement, holders of Restricted Stock will have the right to vote such stock and the right to receive any dividends declared or paid with respect to such stock. The Administrator may provide that any such dividends paid must be reinvested in shares of stock, which may or may not be subject to the same vesting conditions and restrictions applicable to such Restricted Stock. All distributions, if any, received by a grantee with respect to Restricted Stock as a result of any stock split, stock dividend, combination of shares, or other similar transaction will be subject to the restrictions applicable to the original grant.
The grantee will be required, to the extent required by applicable law, to purchase the Restricted Stock at a price equal to the greater of (1) the aggregate par value of the shares of stock represented by such Restricted Stock or (2) the price, if any, specified in the award agreement relating to such Restricted Stock. If specified in the award agreement, the price may be deemed paid by services already rendered.
Restricted Stock Units.
A Restricted Stock Unit is a bookkeeping entry representing the equivalent of shares of stock awarded to a grantee. At the time a grant of Restricted Stock Units is made, the Administrator may establish the applicable “restricted period” and prescribe restrictions in addition to or other than the expiration of the restricted period, including the satisfaction of corporate or individual performance objectives. Restricted Stock Units will not confer shareholder rights to grantees. The Administrator may provide that the holder of Restricted Stock Units will be entitled to receive dividend equivalent rights, which may be deemed reinvested in additional Restricted Stock Units.
Cash- and Stock-Based Performance Awards
Under the Omnibus Plan the Administrator may grant performance awards under which the grantee’s ability to exercise or receive a grant or settlement of any award, and the timing thereof, may be subject to such performance conditions as may be specified by the Administrator. The Administrator may use such business criteria and other measures of performance as it may deem appropriate in establishing any performance conditions, and may, subject to certain limitations in the case of a Performance award intended to qualify under Section 162(m), exercise its discretion to reduce the amounts payable under any award subject to performance conditions.
We intend that performance awards granted to persons who are designated by the Administrator as likely to be “Covered Employees” within the meaning of Section 162(m) and regulations thereunder will, if so designated by the Administrator, constitute “qualified performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Section 162(m) and regulations thereunder. The grant, exercise and/or settlement of such Performance awards will be contingent upon achievement of pre-established performance goals which will consist of one or more business criteria and a targeted level or levels of performance with respect to each of such criterion. Performance goals will be objective and will otherwise meet the requirements of Section 162(m) and regulations thereunder.
In addition, the maximum amount of each cash-based Performance award intended to constitute “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) granted to a grantee in any 12-month period will not exceed $2,000,000.
Shareholders are being asked to re-approve this $2,000,000 limit for purposes of Section 162(m) under this Proposal 4.
One or more of the following business criteria for the Company will be used exclusively by the Administrator in establishing performance goals for such awards:
|
·
|
revenue growth or product revenue growth;
|
|
·
|
operating income (before or after taxes);
|
|
·
|
pre- or after-tax income (before or after allocation of corporate overhead and bonuses);
|
|
·
|
net income (before or after taxes);
|
|
·
|
total shareholder return;
|
|
·
|
return on assets or net assets;
|
|
·
|
appreciation in and/or maintenance of, share price;
|
|
·
|
earnings (including earnings before taxes, earnings before interest and taxes or earnings before interest, taxes depreciation and amortization);
|
|
·
|
economic value-added models or equivalent metrics;
|
|
·
|
comparisons with various stock market indices;
|
|
·
|
cash flows or cash flows per share (before or after dividends);
|
|
·
|
return on capital (including return on total capital or return on invested capital);
|
|
·
|
cash flow return on investment;
|
|
·
|
improvement in or attainment of expense levels or working capital levels;
|
|
·
|
gross margins or cash margin;
|
|
·
|
implementation, completion or attainment of measurable objectives with respect to research, development, products or projects and recruiting and maintaining personnel; and
|
|
·
|
to the extent permitted by applicable law, any other business criteria as determined by the Administrator.
|
Shareholders are being asked to re-approve the foregoing business criteria on which performance goals may be based for purposes of Section 162(m) in this Proposal 4.
The Administrator may, in its discretion, grant other stock-based awards, consisting of stock units or other awards, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based upon, our Common Stock. The terms of such other stock-based awards will be set forth in the applicable award agreements.
Subject to the requirements and limitations of Section 409A if applicable, the Administrator may provide for any one or more of the following in connection with a Change in Control (as defined in the Omnibus Plan):
·
|
The Administrator may, in its discretion, provide in any award agreement or, in the event of a Change in Control, may take such actions as it deems appropriate to provide for the acceleration of the exercisability, vesting and/or settlement in connection with such Change in Control of each or any outstanding award or portion thereof and shares acquired pursuant thereto upon such conditions, including termination of the grantee’s Service (as defined in the Omnibus Plan) prior to, upon, or following such Change in Control, to such extent as the Administrator shall determine
.
|
·
|
In the event of a Change in Control, the surviving, continuing, successor, or purchasing corporation or other business entity or parent thereof, as the case may be (the “Acquiror”), may, without the consent of any grantee, either assume or continue the Company’s rights and obligations under each or any award or portion thereof outstanding immediately prior to the Change in Control or substitute for each or any such outstanding award or portion thereof a substantially equivalent award with respect to the Acquiror’s stock, as applicable; provided, however, that if so determined by the Administrator, in its discretion, an award denominated in shares of stock shall be deemed assumed if, following the Change in Control, the award confers the right to receive, subject to the terms and conditions of the Omnibus Plan and the applicable award agreement, for each share of stock subject to the award immediately prior to the Change in Control, the consideration (whether stock, cash, other securities or property or a combination thereof) to which a holder of a share of stock on the effective date of the Change in Control was entitled; provided, further, that if such consideration is not solely common stock of the Acquiror, the Administrator may, with the consent of the Acquiror, provide for the consideration to be received upon the exercise or settlement of the award, for each share of stock subject to the award, to consist solely of common stock of the Acquiror equal in Fair Market Value (as defined in the Omnibus Plan) to the per share consideration received by holders of stock pursuant to the Change in Control and if any portion of such consideration may be received by holders of stock pursuant to the Change in Control on a contingent or delayed basis, the Administrator may, in its sole discretion, determine such Fair Market Value per share as of the time of the Change in Control on the basis of the Administrator’s good faith estimate of the present value of the probable future payment of such consideration; provided, further, that any award or portion thereof which is neither assumed or continued by the Acquiror in connection with the Change in Control nor exercised or settled as of the time of consummation of the Change in Control shall terminate and cease to be outstanding effective as of the time of consummation of the Change in Control
.
|
·
|
The Administrator may, in its discretion and without the consent of any grantee, determine that, upon the occurrence of a Change in Control, each or any award or a portion thereof outstanding immediately prior to the Change in Control and not previously exercised or settled shall be canceled in exchange for a payment with respect to each vested share (and each unvested share, if so determined by the Administrator) of stock subject to such canceled award in (i) cash, (ii) stock of the Company or of a corporation or other business entity a party to the Change in Control, or (iii) other property which, in any such case, shall be in an amount having a Fair Market Value equal to the Fair Market Value of the consideration to be paid per share of stock in the Change in Control, reduced by the exercise or purchase price per share, if any, under such award; provided, however, that if any portion of such consideration may be received by holders of stock pursuant to the Change in Control on a contingent or delayed basis, the Administrator may, in its sole discretion, determine such Fair Market Value per share as of the time of the Change in Control on the basis of the Administrator’s good faith estimate of the present value of the probable future payment of such consideration and, in the event such determination is made by the Administrator, the amount of such payment (reduced by applicable withholding taxes, if any) shall be paid to grantees in respect of the vested portions of their canceled awards as soon as practicable following the date of the Change in Control and in respect of the unvested portions of their canceled awards in accordance with the vesting schedules applicable to such awards
.
|
The Administrator may permit or require the deferral of any award payment into a deferred compensation arrangement
.
|
Nontransferability of Awards
|
Generally, during the lifetime of a grantee, only the grantee may exercise rights under the Omnibus Plan and no award will be assignable or transferable other than by will or laws of descent and distribution. If authorized in the award agreement, a grantee may transfer, not for value, all or part of an award (other than an ISO) to certain family members (including trusts and foundations for the benefit thereof). Neither Restricted Stock nor Restricted Stock Units may be sold, transferred, assigned, pledged or otherwise encumbered or disposed of during the restricted period or prior to the satisfaction of any other restrictions prescribed by the Administrator
.
The Administrator may provide in the applicable award agreements for actions that will be taken upon a grantee’s Separation from Service (as defined in the Omnibus Plan) from the Company, including but not limited to, accelerated vesting or termination of awards
.
|
Tax Withholding and Tax Offset Payments
|
We will have the right to deduct from payments of any kind otherwise due to a grantee any federal, state, or local taxes of any kind required by law to be withheld with respect to the vesting of or other lapse of restrictions applicable to an award or upon the issuance of any shares of stock upon the exercise of an Option or pursuant to an award
.
The authority to make grants under the Omnibus Plan will terminate on November 10, 2020
.
|
Amendment and Termination
|
The Administrator may, at any time and from time to time, amend, suspend, or terminate the Omnibus Plan as to any shares of stock as to which awards have not been made. An amendment will be contingent on approval of our shareholders to the extent stated by our Administrator, required by applicable law or required by applicable stock exchange listing requirements. No awards will be made after termination of the Omnibus Plan. No amendment, suspension, or termination of the Omnibus Plan will, without the consent of the grantee, impair rights or obligations under any award theretofore awarded under the Omnibus Plan.
If any of the Company’s financial statements are required to be restated, the Company may recover all or a portion of any award made under the Omnibus Plan with respect to any fiscal year of the Company the financial results of which are negatively affected by the restatement. The amount to be recovered will be the amount by which the affected award exceeds the amount that would have been payable had the financial statements been initially filed as restated. In no event will the amount to be recovered by the Company be less than the amount required to be repaid or recovered as a matter of law.
|
Federal Income Tax Consequences
|
The following is a summary of the general federal income tax consequences to the Company and to U.S. taxpayers of awards granted under the Omnibus Plan. Tax consequences for any particular individual or under state or non-U.S. tax laws may be different
.
NSOs and SARs.
No taxable income is reportable when a NSO or SAR is granted. Upon exercise, generally, the grantee will have ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the underlying shares of stock on the exercise date minus the exercise price. Any gain or loss upon the disposition of the stock received upon exercise will be capital gain or loss to the grantee if the appropriate holding period under federal tax law is met for such treatment
.
ISOs.
No taxable income is reportable when an ISO is granted or exercised (except for grantees who are subject to the alternative minimum tax, who may be required to recognize income in the year in which the ISO is exercised). If the grantee exercises the ISO and then sells the underlying shares of stock more than two years after the grant date and more than one year after the exercise date, the excess of the sale price over the exercise price will be taxed as long-term capital gain or loss. If the grantee exercises the ISO and sells the shares before the end of the two- or one-year holding periods, he or she generally will have ordinary income at the time of the sale equal to the fair market value of the shares on the exercise date (or the sale price, if less) minus the exercise price of the ISO
.
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units.
A grantee of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units will not have taxable income upon the grant unless, in the case of Restricted Stock, he or she elects to be taxed at that time. Instead, he or she will have ordinary income at the time of vesting equal to the fair market value on the vesting date of the shares (or cash) received minus any amount paid for the shares.
Cash- and Stock-Based Performance Awards and Other Stock-Based Awards.
Typically, a grantee will not have taxable income upon the grant of cash or stock-based Performance awards or other stock-based awards. Subsequently, when the conditions and requirements for the grants have been satisfied and the payment determined, any cash received and the fair market value of any common stock received will constitute ordinary income to the grantee.
Tax Effect for the Company.
We generally will receive a tax deduction for any ordinary income recognized by a grantee in respect of an award under the Omnibus Plan (for example, upon the exercise of a NSO). In the case of ISOs that meet the holding period requirements described above, the grantee will not recognize ordinary income; therefore, we will not receive a deduction.
Because we are a public company, special rules limit the deductibility of compensation paid to our CEO and to each of our three most highly compensated executive officers other than our CEO whose compensation is required to be reported annually in our proxy statement. Under Section 162(m), the annual compensation paid to each of these executives may not be deductible to the extent that it exceeds $1 million. The limitation on deductions does not apply, however, to qualified “performance-based compensation.” Certain awards under the Omnibus Plan, including Options, SARs and cash- and stock-based Performance awards, may constitute qualified performance-based compensation and, as such, would be exempt from the $1 million limitation on deductible compensation.
Vote Required for Approval
The affirmative vote of a majority of the total votes cast on the foregoing resolution by the holders of our common stock and series B convertible preferred stock, voting together on a combined basis, is required to approve the Omnibus Plan Amendment and to approve the increased individual award limits and re-approve the business criteria that can be used in establishing performance goals for performance awards granted under the Omnibus Plan for the purposes of Section 162(m).. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as voting and, therefore, will have no impact on the approval of the proposal.
Board Recommendation
The Board recommends that the shareholders vote “
FOR
” approval of the Omnibus Plan Amendment and approval of the increased individual award limits and re-approval of business criteria that can be used in establishing performance goals for performance awards granted under the Omnibus Plan for the purposes of Section 162(m).
PROPOSAL 5—APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO
ENSYNC, INC. 2012 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN
(FORMERLY THE ZBB ENERGY CORPORATION 2012 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN)
General
On September 6, 2012, our Board of Directors adopted the 2012 Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation Plan, as approved by the Company’s shareholders at its 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on November 7, 2012, as amended by that certain Amendment No. 1 approved by the Company’s shareholders at its 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on November 18, 2014 (the “2012 Director Equity Plan). As of September 30, 2015, approximately 456,804 shares remained available for issuance under the 2012 Director Equity Plan. Our Board of Directors has determined that this remaining amount is insufficient to meet the Company’s equity compensation requirements
.
On September 17, 2015, our Board of Directors approved the amendment to the 2012 Director Equity Plan described in this proposal (the “Director Plan Amendment”), subject to shareholder approval. If approved by the shareholders, the Director Plan Amendment will increase the number of shares of the Company’s common stock available for issuance under the Director Plan by 1,500,000 shares. Notwithstanding shareholder approval of this Proposal 5, if Proposal 3 (the Authorized Share Increase Proposal) discussed above is not approved by the Company’s shareholders, the Board of Directors may elect not to implement the Director Plan Amendment until a sufficient number of shares of the Company’s common stock have been authorized under the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to allow the Company to issue the shares reserved under the 2012 Director Plan as amended by the Director Plan Amendment.
A copy of the Director Plan Amendment is attached as Appendix C to this Proxy Statement. The material terms of the 2012 Director Equity Plan, assuming the approval of the Director Plan Amendment, are summarized below under the heading “Material Features of the 2012 Director Equity Plan.” This summary of the 2012 Director Equity Plan is not intended to be a complete description of the 2012 Director Equity Plan and is qualified in its entirety by the actual text of the 2012 Director Equity Plan, which is attached as Appendix B to the Company’s proxy statement for the Company’s 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, filed with the SEC on September 25, 2012.
Reasons for the Amendment
The purpose of the Director Plan Amendment is to provide the Company with sufficient flexibility to continue to use the 2012 Director Equity Plan to further the Company’s compensation philosophy and programs. Our Board of Directors believes that the interests of the Company and its shareholders will be advanced if we can continue to offer our non-employee directors restricted stock unit awards and the other types of awards as discussed below to help align the interests of our non-employee directors with those of our shareholders. However, our Board of Directors has determined that the current number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the 2012 Director Equity Plan is insufficient for the stated objectives of the 2012 Director Equity Plan. The Director Plan Amendment will increase the number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2012 Director Equity Plan by 1,500,000 shares.
Material Features of the 2012 Director Equity Plan
Administration of the Plan.
Our Board of Directors has such powers and authorities related to the administration of the 2012 Director Equity Plan as are consistent with our corporate governance documents and applicable law. The Board of Directors has the full power and authority to take all actions and to make all determinations required or provided for under the 2012 Director Equity Plan, any award or any award agreement, and has the full power and authority to take all such other actions and make all such other determinations not inconsistent with the specific terms and provisions of the 2012 Director Equity Plan that the Board of Directors deems to be necessary or appropriate to the administration of the plan.
Type of awards.
Any type of award provided for in the Omnibus Plan is available for grant under the 2012 Director Equity Plan. For information concerning the types of awards that may be made under the 2012 Director Equity Plan, see the section entitled “Material Features of the Omnibus Plan” under Proposal 4 above.
Number of Authorized Shares.
If shareholders approve the Director Plan Amendment, subject to adjustment (in connection with certain changes in capitalization), the total number of shares of our common stock that will be reserved for issuance under the 2012 Director Equity Plan will be 2,097,429.
We currently do not anticipate issuing awards in amounts that will cause us to use more than approximately one third of the remaining available shares in any fiscal year. As a result we anticipate that the number of shares reserved for awards under the 2012 Director Equity Plan will be sufficient to cover our equity awards to our non-employee directors for the current fiscal year and the next one to two fiscal years thereafter.
Share Counting.
If any award under the 2012 Director Equity Plan expires, or is terminated, surrendered or forfeited, in whole or in part, or the shares of Common Stock are not delivered because the award is settled in cash or used to satisfy the applicable tax withholding obligations, the unissued shares of our Common Stock covered by such award shall again be available for the grant of awards under the 2012 Director Equity Plan. If shares of our Common Stock issued pursuant to the 2012 Director Equity Plan are repurchased by, or are surrendered or forfeited to the Company at no more than cost, such shares of our Common Stock shall again be available for the grant of awards under the 2012 Director Equity Plan.
Eligibility and Participation.
Eligibility to participate in the 2012 Director Equity Plan is limited to those members of the Board of Directors who are not current employees of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. As of September 30, 2015, five
directors were eligible to receive awards under the 2012 Director Equity Plan.
New Plan Benefits.
We cannot currently determine the total benefits or number of shares subject to awards that may be granted in the future under the 2012 Director Equity Plan. However, as discussed above under “Non-employee Director Compensation” and in accordance with our Director Compensation Policy, if the Director Plan Amendment is approved by the shareholders we anticipate that on the date of the annual meeting our non-employee directors will receive restricted stock units as indicated in the following table:
New Plan Benefits
|
Dollar Value
|
Number of Units
|
$360,000
|
626,443 (1)
|
(1)
|
Based on an assumed price of common stock equal to $0.5747 per share, which was the volume weighted average closing price of our common stock for the 20-closing day period ending September 30, 2015.
|
Federal Income Tax Consequences.
For information concerning the federal income tax consequences associated with awards that may be made under the 2012 Director Equity Plan, see the section entitled “Federal Income Tax Consequences” under Proposal 4 above.
Change in Control.
Subject to the requirements and limitations of Section 409A if applicable, the Board of Directors may provide for any one or more of the following in connection with a Change in Control (as defined in the Omnibus Plan):
·
|
The Board of Directors may, in its discretion, provide in any award agreement or, in the event of a Change in Control, may take such actions as it deems appropriate to provide for the acceleration of the exercisability, vesting and/or settlement in connection with such Change in Control of each or any outstanding award or portion thereof and shares acquired pursuant thereto upon such conditions, including termination of the grantee’s Service (as defined in the Omnibus Plan) prior to, upon, or following such Change in Control, to such extent as the Board of Directors shall determine
.
|
·
|
In the event of a Change in Control, the surviving, continuing, successor, or purchasing corporation or other business entity or parent thereof, as the case may be (the “Acquiror”), may, without the consent of any grantee, either assume or continue the Company’s rights and obligations under each or any award or portion thereof outstanding immediately prior to the Change in Control or substitute for each or any such outstanding award or portion thereof a substantially equivalent award with respect to the Acquiror’s stock, as applicable; provided, however, that if so determined by the Board of Directors, in its discretion, an award denominated in shares of stock shall be deemed assumed if, following the Change in Control, the award confers the right to receive, subject to the terms and conditions of the 2012 Director Equity Plan and the applicable award agreement, for each share of stock subject to the award immediately prior to the Change in Control, the consideration (whether stock, cash, other securities or property or a combination thereof) to which a holder of a share of stock on the effective date of the Change in Control was entitled; provided, further, that if such consideration is not solely common stock of the Acquiror, the Board of Directors may, with the consent of the Acquiror, provide for the consideration to be received upon the exercise or settlement of the award, for each share of stock subject to the award, to consist solely of common stock of the Acquiror equal in Fair Market Value (as defined in the Omnibus Plan) to the per share consideration received by holders of stock pursuant to the Change in Control and if any portion of such consideration may be received by holders of stock pursuant to the Change in Control on a contingent or delayed basis, the Board of Directors may, in its sole discretion, determine such Fair Market Value per share as of the time of the Change in Control on the basis of the Board of Directors’ good faith estimate of the present value of the probable future payment of such consideration; provided, further, that any award or portion thereof which is neither assumed or continued by the Acquiror in connection with the Change in Control nor exercised or settled as of the time of consummation of the Change in Control shall terminate and cease to be outstanding effective as of the time of consummation of the Change in Control
.
|
·
|
The Board of Directors may, in its discretion and without the consent of any grantee, determine that, upon the occurrence of a Change in Control, each or any award or a portion thereof outstanding immediately prior to the Change in Control and not previously exercised or settled shall be canceled in exchange for a payment with respect to each vested share (and each unvested share, if so determined by the Board of Directors) of stock subject to such canceled award in (i) cash, (ii) stock of the Company or of a corporation or other business entity a party to the Change in Control, or (iii) other property which, in any such case, shall be in an amount having a Fair Market Value equal to the Fair Market Value of the consideration to be paid per share of stock in the Change in Control, reduced by the exercise or purchase price per share, if any, under such award; provided, however, that if any portion of such consideration may be received by holders of stock pursuant to the Change in Control on a contingent or delayed basis, the Board of Directors may, in its sole discretion, determine such Fair Market Value per share as of the time of the Change in Control on the basis of the Board of Directors’ good faith estimate of the present value of the probable future payment of such consideration and, in the event such determination is made by the Board of Directors, the amount of such payment (reduced by applicable withholding taxes, if any) shall be paid to grantees in respect of the vested portions of their canceled awards as soon as practicable following the date of the Change in Control and in respect of the unvested portions of their canceled awards in accordance with the vesting schedules applicable to such awards
.
|
Deferral Arrangements.
The Board of Directors may permit or require the deferral of any award payment into a deferred compensation arrangement
.
Nontransferability of Awards.
Generally, during the lifetime of a grantee, only the grantee may exercise rights under the 2012 Director Equity Plan and no award will be assignable or transferable other than by will or laws of descent and distribution. If authorized in the award agreement, a grantee may transfer, not for value, all or part of an award (other than an ISO) to certain family members (including trusts and foundations for the benefit thereof). Neither Restricted Stock nor Restricted Stock Units may be sold, transferred, assigned, pledged or otherwise encumbered or disposed of during the restricted period or prior to the satisfaction of any other restrictions prescribed by the Board of Directors.
Separation from Service.
The Board of Directors may provide in the applicable award agreements for actions that will be taken upon a grantee’s Separation from Service (as defined in the Omnibus Plan) from the Company, including but not limited to, accelerated vesting or termination of awards.
Tax Withholding and Tax Offset Payments.
We will have the right to deduct from payments of any kind otherwise due to a grantee any federal, state, or local taxes of any kind required by law to be withheld with respect to the vesting of or other lapse of restrictions applicable to an award or upon the issuance of any shares of stock upon the exercise of an Option or pursuant to an award.
Term of Plan.
The authority to make grants under the 2012 Director Equity Plan will terminate on November 7, 2022.
Vote Required for Approval
The affirmative vote of a majority of the total votes cast on the foregoing resolution by the holders of our common stock and series B convertible preferred stock, voting together on a combined basis, is required to approve the Director Plan Amendment. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as voting and, therefore, will have no impact on the approval of the proposal
.
Board Recommendation
The Board of Directors recommends that the shareholders vote “
FOR
” approval of the Director Plan Amendment
.
PROPOSAL 6 —RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Proposal
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has appointed Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP (“Baker Tilly”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2016. We are presenting this selection to our shareholders for ratification at the annual meeting.
A representative of Baker Tilly is expected to be present at the annual meeting. In addition to having the opportunity to make a statement, Baker Tilly’s representative will be available to respond to any appropriate questions.
If the shareholders do not ratify the appointment of Baker Tilly, the Audit Committee will take such action into account in reconsidering the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2016.
Vote Required for Approval
The affirmative vote of a majority of the total votes cast on this proposal by the holders of our common stock and series B convertible preferred stock, voting together on a combined basis, shall constitute ratification of the selection of Baker Tilly as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2016. Abstentions will not be counted as voting and, therefore, will have no impact on the approval of the proposal. Broker non-votes are not expected not occur in connection with this proposal.
Board Recommendation
The Board of Directors recommends that the shareholders vote “
FOR
” ratification of the appointment of Baker Tilly as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2016.
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed or expected to be billed by Baker Tilly for fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014, for audit and non-audit services, including “out-of-pocket” expenses incurred in rendering these services. The nature of the services provided for each category is described in the following the tables.
Fee Category
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Audit Fees (1)
|
|
|
149,500
|
|
|
|
140,195
|
|
Audit-Related Fees (2)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
51,500
|
|
Tax Fees
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
All Other Fees
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
|
149,500
|
|
|
|
191,695
|
|
(1)
|
Audit fees include fees for professional services and expenses associated with the audits of our consolidated annual statements, reviews of our consolidated financial statements included in our Form 10-Qs, consents and assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC.
|
(2)
|
Audit-related fees include fees for professional services and expenses associated with the preparation of comfort letters and statutory audit required by a lender.
|
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
The Audit Committee has adopted a policy that requires all services to be provided by the Company’s independent public accounting firm, including audit services and permitted non-audit services, to be pre-approved by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee approved all audit and permitted non-audit services provided by Baker Tilly during fiscal years 2014 and 2015.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
September 2013 Private Placement Transaction
On September 26, 2013, we entered into Securities Purchase Agreements with certain investors providing for the sale of shares of our series B Convertible Preferred Stock at a price per share equal to $1,000. Shares of Preferred Stock were sold for $1000 per share (the “Stated Value”) and accrue dividends on the Stated Value at an annual rate of 10%. The Preferred Stock is convertible into shares of common stock of the Company (“Common Stock”) at a conversion price equal to $0.95 (the “Conversion Price”). In connection with the purchase of the Preferred Stock, each investor received a warrant to purchase a number of shares of Common Stock equal to 100% times such investor’s investment in the Preferred Stock divided by the Conversion Price, at an exercise price equal to the Conversion Price. Officers and directors purchased, directly or indirectly, a total of $1,500,000 of shares of Preferred Stock and received warrants to purchase common stock as follows:
Name
|
Relation
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Purchase Price
|
|
|
Number of
Warrant Shares
|
|
Paul F. Koeppe
|
Director
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
$
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
1,315,789
|
|
Richard A. Abdoo
|
Director
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
$
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
1,315,789
|
|
Theodore Stern (1)
|
Director
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
5,263,158
|
|
|
(1) Shares are owned directly by Bomoseen Associates LP. Mr. Stern shares voting and dispositive power over the shares.
|
HOUSEHOLDING OF ANNUAL MEETING MATERIALS
Some banks, brokers and other nominee record holders may be participating in the practice of “householding.” This means that only one copy of our annual report and proxy statement will be sent to shareholders who share the same last name and address. Householding is designed to reduce duplicate mailings and save significant printing and postage costs.
If you receive a household mailing this year and would like to receive additional copies of our annual report and/or proxy statement, please submit your request in writing to: EnSync, Inc., N93 W14475 Whittaker Way, Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin 53051, Attention: Secretary or by calling the Company at (262) 253-9800. Any shareholder who wants to receive separate copies of the proxy statement in the future, or who is currently receiving multiple copies and would like to receive only one copy for his or her household, should contact his or her bank, broker, or other nominee record holder.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
In accordance with our Bylaws, nominations, other than by or at the direction of the Board of Directors, of candidates for election as directors at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must be received by us no earlier than June 20, 2016 and no later than August 19, 2016. Such nominations must also satisfy the other requirements for shareholders nominations set forth in our bylaws.
To be considered for inclusion in the proxy statement solicited by the Board of Directors, shareholder proposals for consideration at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, pursuant to Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Exchange Act by the SEC, must be received by us at our principal executive offices by June 9, 2016. Such proposals must also satisfy the procedures set forth in Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act. Our Bylaws require shareholders who wish to make a proposal at the next annual meeting of our shareholders—other than one that will be included in our proxy statement—to notify us no later than August 19, 2016. Such proposals must also satisfy the other requirements for shareholders proposals set forth in our Bylaws.
Such nominations or proposals must be submitted to EnSync, Inc., N93 W14475 Whittaker Way, Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin 53051, Attention: Secretary. To avoid disputes as to the date of receipt, it is suggested that any shareholder proposal be submitted by certified mail, return receipt requested.
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our officers and directors, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of our outstanding common stock, to file initial reports of ownership with respect to our equity securities and reports of changes in such ownership with the SEC. Such persons are required by SEC rules to furnish us with all copies of Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms received by us, we believe that during the year ended June 30, 2015, all filing requirements were timely satisfied, except for Mr. Abdoo who filed one late Form 4 on October 8, 2014 for a transaction that occurred on October 3, 2014 and Ms. Wagner and Mr. Dennis who each filed one late Form 4 on November 20, 2014 for transactions that occurred on November 5, 2014
EXPENSES AND SOLICITATION
The cost of solicitation of proxies will be borne by us, and in addition to soliciting shareholders by mail, our directors, officers and other employees may, without receiving additional compensation, solicit proxies personally or by telephone. Solicitation by our directors, officers and other employees may also be made of some of our shareholders in person or by mail, telephone or telegraph following the original solicitation. We may request banks, brokers and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward proxy soliciting materials to the owners of our stock held in their names and, if so, will reimburse such banks, brokers and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonable out-of-pocket costs incurred in connection with the distribution of such proxy materials. We may also retain an independent proxy solicitation firm to assist in the solicitation of proxies.
OTHER BUSINESS
The Board of Directors knows of no business that will be presented for consideration at the annual meeting other than those items stated above. If any other business should come before the annual meeting, votes may be cast pursuant to proxies in respect to any such business in the best judgment of the person or persons acting under the proxies.
Appendix A
ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
TO ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
OF ENSYNC, INC.
Pursuant to Section 180.1003
of the Wisconsin Business Corporation Law
Pursuant to resolutions of the Board of Directors adopted September 17, 2015 and the approval of the shareholders of EnSync, Inc., a Wisconsin corporation (the
"Corporation"
), on November 17, 2015, and in accordance with the provisions of Section 180.1003 of Wisconsin Business Corporation Law, the following resolution was duly adopted:
RESOLVED, that the Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation be, and they hereby are, amended by deleting Article IV thereof and inserting in its place the following:
ARTICLE IV
The aggregate number of shares which the Corporation shall have the authority to issue, the designation of each class of shares, the authorized number of shares of each class and the par value thereof per share shall be as follows:
Class
|
Number of Shares Authorized
|
Par Value Per Share
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
Three Hundred Million (300,000,000)
|
One Cent ($.01)
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
Ten Million (10,000,000)
|
One Cent ($.01)
|
The preferences, limitations and relative rights of shares of each class and the authority of the Board of Directors of the Corporation to create and to designate series of Preferred Stock and to determine the preferences, limitations and relative rights as between series shall be as follows:
A.
Common Stock
.
1.
Voting
. Except as otherwise provided by law and except as may be determined by the Board of Directors of the Corporation with respect to shares of Preferred Stock as provided in Section B, below, only the holders of shares of Common Stock shall be entitled to vote for the election of directors of the Corporation and for all other corporate purposes. Except as otherwise provided by law, upon any such vote, each holder of Common Stock shall be entitled to one vote for each share of Common Stock held of record by such shareholder.
2.
Dividends
. Subject to the provisions of paragraph (2) of Section B, below, the holders of Common Stock shall be entitled to receive such dividends as may be declared thereon from time to time by the Board of Directors of the Corporation, in its discretion, out of any funds of the Corporation at the time legally available for payment of dividends.
3.
Liquidation
. In the event of the voluntary or involuntary dissolution, liquidation or winding up of the Corporation, after there have been paid to or set aside for the holders of shares of Preferred Stock the full preferential amounts, if any, to which they are entitled as provided in paragraph (3) of Section B, below, the holders of outstanding shares of Common Stock shall be entitled to share ratably, according to the number of shares held by each, in the remaining assets of the Corporation available for distribution.
B.
Preferred Stock
.
1.
Series and Variations Between Series
. The Board of Directors of the Corporation is authorized, to the fullest extent permitted under the Wisconsin Business Corporation Law and the provisions of this Section B, to provide for the issuance of the Preferred Stock in one or more series, each of such series to be distinctively designated, and to have such voting rights, redemption or conversion rights, dividend or distribution rights, preferences with respect to dividends or distributions, or other preferences, limitations or relative rights as shall be provided by the Board of Directors of the Corporation consistent with the provisions of this Article IV. The Board of Directors of the Corporation, unless otherwise provided when the series is established, may increase or decrease the number of shares of any series, provided that the number of shares of any series shall not be reduced below the number of shares then outstanding.
2.
Dividends
. Before any dividends (other than a dividend payable solely in Common Stock) shall be paid or set apart for payment upon shares of Common Stock, the holders of each series of Preferred Stock shall be entitled to receive dividends at the rate (which may be fixed or variable) and at such times as specified in the particular series, if any. The holders of shares of Preferred Stock shall have no rights to participate with the holders of shares of Common Stock in any dividends in excess of the preferential dividends, if any, fixed for such Preferred Stock.
3.
Liquidation
. In the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up (whether voluntary or involuntary) of the Corporation, the holders of shares of Preferred Stock shall be entitled to be paid the full amount payable on such shares upon the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation fixed by the Board of Directors with respect to such shares, if any, before any amount shall be paid to the holders of the Common Stock.
This Amendment shall be effective as of 12:01 a.m. central time the [___] day of [__________], 2015.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this instrument as of the [___] day of [__________], 2015.
|
|
ENSYNC, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
|
(Signature)
|
|
|
Name: Dilek Wagner
|
|
|
Title: Vice President of Finance
|
This instrument was drafted by:
Mark R. Busch
K&L Gates LLP
214 North Tryon Street, 47th Floor
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
Appendix B
Amendment No. 3
of the
EnSync, Inc. 2010 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan
(formerly the ZBB Energy Corporation 2010 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan)
This Amendment No. 3 (the “Amendment”), dated [__________], 2015, of the 2010 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Existing Plan”; as amended hereby, the “Plan”), of EnSync, Inc., a Wisconsin corporation (the “Company”), is made and adopted by the Company, subject to approval of the shareholders of the Company.
Statement of Purpose
The Existing Plan was originally approved by the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) on August 26, 2010, and by its shareholders on November 10, 2010, and became effective on such date. The Existing Plan was previously amended pursuant to that certain Amendment No. 1, effective upon shareholder approval on November 7, 2012, and that certain Amendment No. 2, effective upon shareholder approval on September 17, 2014. The Board may amend the Existing Plan at any time, pursuant to and subject to Section 5.2 of the Existing Plan, contingent on approval by the shareholders of the Company, if shareholder approval is required by applicable securities exchange rules or applicable law. The Board has determined that it is advisable and in the best interest of the Company to amend the Existing Plan to increase the number of shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01, authorized for issuance under the Existing Plan by 5,000,000 shares.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Existing Plan is hereby amended as follows, subject to approval by the shareholders of the Company:
1.
Capitalized Terms
. All capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings given thereto in the Existing Plan.
2.
Amendment to Existing Plan
. Section 4.1
of the Existing Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
“4.1.
Authorized Number of Shares
Subject to adjustment under Section 15, the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued pursuant to the Plan is the sum of (i) 2,950,000 plus (ii) effective upon [___________], 2015 (subject to shareholder approval), 5,000,000 shares. All of the shares of Common Stock available for issuance under the Plan shall be available for issuance under Incentive Stock Options. Shares issued under the Plan may consist in whole or in part of authorized but unissued shares, treasury shares, or shares purchased on the open market or otherwise, all as determined by the Company from time to time. The maximum number of each type of Award (other than cash-based Performance Awards) intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Code Section 162(m) granted to any Grantee in any thirty-six (36)-month period shall not exceed the following: Options: 3,000,000; SARs: 3,000,000; Restricted Stock: 3,000,000; Restricted Stock Units: 3,000,000; and Other Stock-based Performance Awards: 3,000,000.”
3.
Reference to and Effect on the Plan
. The Plan, as amended hereby, and all other documents, instruments, and agreements executed and/or delivered in connection therewith, shall remain in full force and effect, and are hereby ratified and confirmed.
4.
Governing Law
. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Wisconsin.
* * *
Effective this [__] day of [________], 2015.
Appendix C
Amendment No. 2
of the
EnSync, Inc. 2012 Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation Plan
(formerly the ZBB Energy Corporation 2012 Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation Plan)
This Amendment No. 2 (the “Amendment”), dated [____________], 2015, of the 2012 Non-Employee Director Equity Compensation Plan (the “Existing Plan”; as amended hereby, the “Plan”), of EnSync, Inc., a Wisconsin corporation (the “Company”), is made and adopted by the Company, subject to approval of the shareholders of the Company.
Statement of Purpose
The Existing Plan was originally approved by the Company’s Board of Directors on September 6, 2012, and by its shareholders on November 7, 2012, and became effective on such date. The Existing Plan was previously amended pursuant to that certain Amendment No. 1, effective upon shareholder approval on September 17, 2014. The Board may amend the Existing Plan at any time, pursuant to and subject to Section 5.2 of the Existing Plan, contingent on approval by the shareholders of the Company, if shareholder approval is required by applicable securities exchange rules or applicable law. The Board has determined that it is advisable and in the best interest of the Company to amend the Existing Plan to increase the number of shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01, authorized for issuance under the Existing Plan by 1,500,000 shares.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Existing Plan is hereby amended as follows, subject to approval by the shareholders of the Company:
1.
Capitalized Terms
. All capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings given thereto in the Existing Plan.
2.
Amendment to Existing Plan
. Section 4.1 of the Existing Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
“4.1.
Authorized Number of Shares
Subject to adjustment under Section 9, the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued pursuant to the Plan is the sum of (i) 1,700,000 shares plus (ii) effective upon [____________], 2015 (subject to shareholder approval), 1,500,000 shares.”
3.
Reference to and Effect on the Plan
. The Plan, as amended hereby, and all other documents, instruments, and agreements executed and/or delivered in connection therewith, shall remain in full force and effect, and are hereby ratified and confirmed.
4.
Governing Law
. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Wisconsin.
* * *
Effective this [__] day of [________], 2015.
Using a
black ink
pen, mark your votes with an
X
as shown in
this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.
X
0269CA
1 U PX
+
Annual Meeting Proxy Card
.
C Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below
Please sign exactly as name appears hereon. When shares are held by joint tenants, both should sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee, or guardian, please give full
title as such. If a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by president or other authorized officer. If a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.
Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. +
B Non-Voting Items
A Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR all the nominees listed and FOR Proposals 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.
Change of Address
— Please print new address below.
Comments
— Please print your comments below.
IMPORTANT ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION
For Against Abstain
2. Approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to the
named executive officers of EnSync, Inc.
4. Approve the 2010 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive
Plan Amendment.
For Against Abstain
3. Approve an amendment to our Articles of Incorporation, as
amended, increasing the number of authorized shares of
common stock from 150,000,000 shares to 300,000,000 shares.
5. Approve the 2012 Non-Employee Director Equity
Compensation Plan Amendment.
6. Ratify the selection of Baker Tilly as independent registered
public accounting firm for fiscal 2016.
7. In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may
properly come before the meeting.
01 - Richard A. Abdoo 02 - Manfred E. Birnbaum
1. Election of Directors:
For Withhold For Withhold
1234 5678 9012 345
2 5 0 9 1 1 1
MR A SAMPLE (THIS AREA IS SET UP TO ACCOMMODATE
140 CHARACTERS) MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND
MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND
MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND
C 1234567890 J N T
000000000.000000 ext
000000000.000000 ext
000000000.000000 ext
000000000.000000 ext
000000000.000000 ext
000000000.000000 ext
000004
MR A SAMPLE
DESIGNATION (IF ANY)
ADD 1
ADD 2
ADD 3
ADD 4
ADD 5
ADD 6
ENDORSEMENT_LINE______________ SACKPACK_____________
C123456789
q
IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
q
Electronic Voting Instructions
Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!
Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the voting
methods outlined below to vote your proxy.
VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.
Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by
1:00 a.m., Central Time, on November 17, 2015.
Vote by Internet
• Go to
www.envisionreports.com/ESNC
• Or scan the QR code with your smartphone
• Follow the steps outlined on the secure website
Vote by telephone
• Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories &
Canada on a touch tone telephone
• Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message