SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS
PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
ý |
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
For the fiscal year ended January 31, 2005. |
|
|
|
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
For the transition period from to . |
|
|
|
Commission File No. 1-7062 |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class |
|
Name of Exchange on Which Registered |
Shares of
Beneficial Interest,
|
|
American Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ý
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes o No ý
Aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of July 31, 2004: $2,248,349
Number of shares of voting stock outstanding as of April 22, 2005: 8,906,429.
PART I
Item 1. BUSINESS
INTRODUCTION TO OUR BUSINESS
InnSuites Hospitality Trust (the Trust) is headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona and is an unincorporated Ohio real estate investment trust. The Trust, with its affiliates RRF Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership (the Partnership), and InnSuites Hotels, Inc., an Arizona corporation (InnSuites Hotels), owns and operates six hotels, provides management services for ten hotels, and provides trademark license services for 11 hotels. On January 31, 2005, the Trust owned a 64.75% sole general partner interest in the Partnership, which owned five InnSuites® hotels located in Arizona, New Mexico and southern California. The Trust also owned one InnSuites® hotel located in Yuma, Arizona (all six InnSuites® hotels are hereinafter referred to as the Hotels). InnSuites Hotels, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Trust, provides management services for the Hotels, three hotels owned by affiliates of James F. Wirth, the Trusts Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, and one unrelated hotel property. InnSuites Hotels also provides trademark and licensing services to the Hotels, three hotels owned by affiliates of Mr. Wirth and two unrelated hotel properties. The Trust has 488 employees.
The Hotels have an aggregate of 947 hotel suites and operate as moderate and full-service hotels, which apply a value studio and two-room suite operating philosophy formulated in 1980 by Mr. Wirth. The Trust owns and operates hotels as studio and two-room suite hotels that offer services such as free hot breakfast buffets and complementary afternoon social hours plus amenities, such as microwave ovens, refrigerators, free high speed internet access and coffee makers in each studio or two-room suite.
The Trust believes that the greatest opportunities for revenue growth and profitability will arise from the skillful management and repositioning of the Trusts Hotels and acquired or managed hotel properties. The Trusts primary business objectives are to maximize returns to its shareholders through increases in asset value and cash flow available for distribution and to increase long-term total returns to shareholders. The Trust seeks to achieve these objectives through participation in increased revenues from the Hotels as a result of intensive management and marketing and selective acquisitions and expansion of the InnSuites® hotels in the southwestern region of the United States. At this time, the Trust does not plan to acquire any additional hotels.
The Trust has a single class of Shares of Beneficial Interest, without par value, that are traded on the American Stock Exchange under the symbol IHT. The Partnership has two outstanding classes of limited partnership interests, Class A and Class B, which are identical in all respects. Each Class A limited partnership unit is convertible, at the option of the Class A holder, into one newly-issued Share of Beneficial Interest of the Trust and each Class B limited partnership unit is convertible, upon approval of the Board of Trustees of the Trust, into one newly-issued Share of Beneficial Interest of the Trust. The Partnership Agreement of the Partnership subjects both general and limited partner units to certain restrictions on transfer.
Until February 1, 2004, the Trust elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (REIT), as that term is defined and used in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and the regulations thereunder (all as amended, the Code). Effective February 1, 2004, the Trust relinquished its REIT tax status and will be taxed as a C corporation under the Code.
ACQUISITION OF INNSUITES HOTELS BY THE TRUST
Effective February 1, 2001, the Trust acquired all of the issued and outstanding common and preferred equity stock of InnSuites Hotels for $11,531 in cash and the assumption of approximately $1.6 million of net liabilities. Prior to the acquisition, InnSuites Hotels was owned 23% by Marc E. Berg, Executive Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer and Trustee of the Trust, 9.8% by InnSuites Innternational Hotels, Inc., a wholly owned affiliate of Mr. Wirth and his spouse, and 67.2% by unrelated parties.
The acquisition of InnSuites Hotels by the Trust resulted in the following benefits: (1) a more direct relationship between the Hotels and the Trust, (2) the inclusion of InnSuites Hotels revenues in excess of required rent payments in the Trusts consolidated financial reports, (3) the elimination of potential conflicts of interest and (4) the reduction of certain administrative costs relative to the operation of the Hotels.
2
MANAGEMENT AND LICENSING CONTRACTS
As a REIT, through January 31, 2004, the Trust was prohibited from operating its properties other than through an independent management company or a taxable REIT subsidiary. Following the acquisition of InnSuites Hotels by the Trust effective February 1, 2001, InnSuites Hotels operated and managed the Hotels with the assistance of Suite Hospitality Management, Inc. (the Management Company), an entity in which Mr. Wirth, until July 1, 2003, held a 9.8% ownership interest, pursuant to management agreements that provided for an annual management fee of 2.5% of gross revenues. On December 31, 2003, the Trust agreed to extend the current management agreements through January 31, 2008 in exchange for the Management Company forgiving $183,248 of accrued but unpaid fees. The Trust incurred management fee expenses related to these contracts of $177,742, $440,530 and $369,896 for the twelve months ended January 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Due to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46R (FIN 46R), which resulted in the consolidation of the Management Company with the Trust, these expenses have been eliminated in the consolidation for the twelve months ended January 31, 2005.
Prior to June 8, 2004, InnSuites Hotels paid InnSuites Licensing Corp. (the Licensing Corp.), an entity owned by Mr. Wirth and his spouse until February 2, 2004, an annual licensing fee of 2.0% of gross room revenues (1.0% for those hotel properties which also carried a third-party franchise, such as Best Western® or Holiday Inn®) for trademark and licensing services relating to the use of the InnSuites® name and marks. On December 31, 2003, the Trust agreed to extend the trademark and licensing services agreements for the next two fiscal years through January 31, 2007 in exchange for the Licensing Corp. forgiving $347,473 of accrued but unpaid fees. The Management Company purchased the Licensing Corp. from Mr. and Mrs. Wirth on February 2, 2004. The Trust incurred licensing fees of $94,703, $301,007 and $445,942 for the twelve months ended January 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Due to the adoption of FIN 46R, which resulted in the consolidation of the Licensing Corp. with the Trust, these expenses have been eliminated in the consolidation for the twelve months ended January 31, 2005.
In connection with the Trusts relinquishment of its REIT status, the Trust no longer required the services of a separate management company. The Trust determined it was in its best interest to buy out the management contracts and licensing agreements and directly manage the Hotels through the Trusts wholly owned subsidiary, InnSuites Hotels. The Trust believes the management process of the Hotels will be simplified and that it will benefit from increased revenues by offering additional management and licensing services. As a result of this buy out, the Management Company (which was the Trusts variable interest entity under FIN 46R) was no longer consolidated in the second quarter of fiscal year 2005.
Effective June 8, 2004, InnSuites Hotels acquired the management agreements under which the Management Company provided management services to the Hotels. In consideration of the acquisition, the stockholder of the Management Company received $20,000 and 90,000 Shares of Beneficial Interest of the Trust, reflecting a transaction value of approximately $159,500 in the aggregate. Following the acquisition, InnSuites Hotels now self-manages the Hotels. InnSuites Hotels also manages one unrelated hotel in San Diego, California and three hotels owned by affiliates of Mr. Wirth.
Under the management agreements, InnSuites Hotels provides the personnel at the hotels, the expenses of which are reimbursed at cost, and manages the hotels daily operations. All such expenses and reimbursements between InnSuites Hotels and the Partnership have been eliminated in consolidation. InnSuites Hotels received 2% of room revenue from the Hotels owned by the Partnership and the Trust in exchange for management services during fiscal year 2005. Effective February 1, 2005, InnSuites Hotels receives 2.5% of total revenues from these Hotels. These agreements expire on January 31, 2008. InnSuites Hotels received 1% (or more depending on results) of room revenue from the three hotels owned by affiliates of Mr. Wirth in exchange for management services during fiscal year 2005. These agreements require these three hotels to pay 2% of room revenue, unless these hotels fail to reach 80% of their budgeted profit, at which point the fees are reduced to 1% of room revenue. These agreements expire on February 1, 2007 and may be cancelled by either party with 90-days written notice, or 30-days written notice in the event the property changes ownership. InnSuites Hotels received 5% of total revenue for managing the unrelated hotel in San Diego, California during fiscal year 2005. This agreement expires on March 31, 2007, and may be cancelled by either party with 90-days written notice or 30-days written notice in the event the property changes ownership.
Effective June 8, 2004, InnSuites Hotels acquired the license agreements under which Licensing Corp. provided licensing services to the Hotels, and the related registered and unregistered InnSuites trademarks and tradenames. In consideration of the acquisitions, the Management Company (as the sole stockholder of Licensing Corp.) received $60,000 and 10,000 Shares of Beneficial Interest of the Trust and InnSuites Hotels satisfied Licensing Corp.s line of credit in the amount of $459,000, reflecting a transaction value of approximately $534,500 in the aggregate. The Shares of Beneficial Interest issued by the Trust for both the management contracts and the licensing agreements were valued at $155,000, which amount was recorded as an expense. Following the acquisition,
3
the Trust provides licensing services to the Hotels and two unrelated hotels in San Diego and Buena Park, California and three hotels owned by affiliates of Mr. Wirth.
InnSuites hotels received 1.0% (2.0% for the hotel which does not carry a third-party franchise) of room revenue from the Hotels owned by the Partnership and the Trust in exchange for use of the InnSuites trademark during fiscal year 2005. The revenue and expenses related to these contracts have been eliminated in consolidation. Effective February 1, 2005, InnSuites Hotels receives 1.25% (2.5% for the hotel which does not carry a third-party franchise) of total revenues from these Hotels. These agreements expire on January 31, 2008. InnSuites Hotels received 1% (or more depending on results) of room revenue from the three hotels owned by affiliates of Mr. Wirth in exchange for use of the InnSuites trademark during fiscal year 2005. These agreements require that these hotels pay 2% of room revenue, unless these hotels fail to reach 80% of their budgeted profit, at which point the fees are reduced to 1% of room revenue. These agreements have no expiration date and may be cancelled by either party with 12-months written notice, or 90-days written notice in the event the property changes ownership. InnSuites Hotels received 2% of total revenue from the unrelated hotel in San Diego, California in exchange for licensing services during fiscal year 2005. This agreement may be cancelled by either party with 90-days written notice. InnSuites Hotels received 0.5% of room revenue from the unrelated hotel in Buena Park, California in exchange for licensing services during fiscal year 2005. This agreement has no expiration date and may be cancelled by either party with 30-days written notice.
FRANCHISE AGREEMENTS
InnSuites Hotels has entered into franchise arrangements with certain third parties with respect to five of the Hotels, with four Best Western hotels and one Holiday Inn hotel as of January 31, 2005. In exchange for use of the Best Western name, trademark and reservation system, the participating Hotels pay fees to Best Western International based on reservations received through the use of the Best Western reservation system and the number of available suites at the participating Hotels. The agreements with Best Western have no specific expiration terms and are cancelable at the option of either party. Best Western requires that the participating Hotels meet certain requirements for room quality, and such Hotels are subject to removal from its reservation system if these requirements are not met. In exchange for use of the Holiday Inn name, trademark and reservation system, the participating Hotels pay fees based on gross room revenue. Subsequent to January 31, 2005, the Trust ended its franchise agreement with Holiday Inn and entered into a franchise agreement with Best Western International for the Trusts Ontario, California property. The Hotels with third-party franchise agreements received significant reservations through the Best Western and Holiday Inn reservation systems. The Trust incurred $553,833, $628,521 and $656,375 in total fees related to these agreements for the twelve months ended January 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
SALE OF HOTEL PROPERTIES
On March 21, 2003, the Trust sold its Scottsdale, Arizona property to Eldorado Resort, L.L.C. (Eldorado), an affiliate of Mr. Wirth, for its appraised and carrying value of $3.1 million. During fiscal year 2003, the Trust recorded a loss on impairment of $590,000 on the property. The propertys decrease in value was due to changes in the economic condition, and decreased prospects for future development, in its immediate area. Eldorado paid for the hotel by assuming $1.1 million of the Trusts notes payable to Rare Earth Financial, L.L.C. (Rare Earth Financial), an affiliate of Mr. Wirth, assuming $500,000 of the Partnerships notes payable to Capital Resource Lenders-I, L.L.C., an affiliate of Mr. Wirth, and paying the Trusts term loan of $1,500,000 to the lender in full.
On August 21, 2003, the Trust sold its Flagstaff, Arizona property to Flagstaff Grand Canyon Resort, LLC (Flagstaff Resort), an affiliate of Mr. Wirth, for a cash payment equal to its appraised value of $2,775,000. The Trust used the proceeds to fully satisfy its $1.5 million bank line of credit and to reduce its notes payable to Rare Earth Financial by $1,275,000. As of August 21, 2003, the Trusts bank line of credit and bank term loan were fully satisfied. The purchase price exceeded the carrying value of the property by $377,330, which was recorded as a capital contribution to the Partnership, and which resulted in a net increase in shareholder equity in the amount of $192,080, net of minority interest.
On October 16, 2003, the Trust sold its Buena Park, California property to CVTI, LLC, an unrelated third party (CVTI), for $6.5 million. The purchase price was satisfied with $6.3 million in cash and a $200,000 promissory note issued by CVTI to the Trust. The Trust subsequently assigned the $200,000 promissory note to Rare Earth Financial to satisfy $200,000 of a certain note payable held by Rare Earth Financial. The Trust used the cash proceeds to fully satisfy the bank mortgage note on the property in the amount of $3,082,574, to reduce certain notes payable to Mr. Wirth and his affiliates and Steven S. Robson, a Trustee of the Trust, in the aggregate amount of $1.5 million and to reduce trade accounts payable. In connection with this sale, the Trust recorded a loss of $29,000. During the second quarter of fiscal year 2004, the Trust recorded a loss on impairment of $328,976 related to the Buena Park property. The loss was recorded to reduce the
4
assets carrying value to the sales price. The decrease in value was due to a slowdown in leisure travel to the southern California area caused by global terror concerns and an overall sluggish economic environment.
On March 25, 2004, the Trust sold its Tempe, Arizona hotel to Tempe/Phoenix Airport Resort LLC (Tempe Resort), an affiliate of Mr. Wirth, for its appraised value of $6.8 million, which was also its carrying value. The purchase price was satisfied by Tempe Resort assuming the Trusts mortgage note payable on the property of $1.7 million and assuming notes payable to Mr. Wirth and his affiliates of $5.1 million.
On April 1, 2004, the Trust sold its San Diego, California hotel to an unrelated third party for $9.7 million, which the Trust received in cash. The Trust used $4.8 million of the proceeds to satisfy its mortgage note payable on the property, $1.4 million to satisfy notes and interest payable to related parties, and retained the remaining proceeds to reduce trade payables and to fund future operations and capital improvements.
HOTEL PROPERTY HELD FOR SALE
On January 4, 2005, the Board of Trustees approved the sale of the Phoenix, Arizona hotel to Phoenix Northern Resort LLC, an affiliate of Mr. Wirth, for its appraised value of $5.1 million. The propertys carrying value is $3.1 million. On January 15, 2005, Rare Earth Financial, another affiliate of Mr. Wirth, converted its $700,000 loan receivable into a non-interest bearing deposit for the purchase of the hotel. The Trust expects to complete the sale during the second quarter of fiscal year 2006. Any gain or loss recognized on the transaction will be recorded as a contribution or distribution because the purchaser is a related party. The Trust does not expect to incur a loss on the sale of the property.
COMPETITION IN THE HOTEL INDUSTRY
The hotel industry is highly competitive and competition has intensified over the past three years due to the sluggish economy and a general slow down in the travel and hospitality industries primarily due to the negative impact of the threat of terrorism and the war with Iraq. Each of the Hotels experiences competition primarily from other mid-market hotels located in its immediate vicinity, but also competes with hotel properties located in other geographic markets. While none of the Hotels competitors dominate any of the Trusts geographic markets, some of those competitors have greater marketing and financial resources than the Trust.
A number of additional hotel property developments have been announced or have recently been completed by competitors in a number of the Hotels markets, and additional hotel property developments may be built in the future. Such hotel developments have had, and could continue to have, an adverse effect on the revenue of the Hotels in their respective markets.
The Trust has chosen to focus its hotel investments in the southwest region of the United States. The Trust has a concentration of assets in the metropolitan Phoenix and Tucson, Arizona markets. In the Phoenix and Tucson, Arizona and the Albuquerque, New Mexico markets, the supply of hotel rooms has been increasing faster than the rate of demand. Supply rates also generally increased faster than demand rates in the Yuma, Arizona market. The southern California market continues to support balanced supply and demand rates.
The Trust may also compete for investment opportunities with other entities that have greater financial resources. These entities also may generally accept more risk than the Trust can prudently manage. Competition may generally reduce the number of suitable future investment opportunities available to the Trust and increase the bargaining power of owners seeking to sell their properties.
SEASONALITY OF THE HOTEL BUSINESS
The Hotels operations historically have been seasonal. The four southern Arizona hotels experience their highest occupancy in the first fiscal quarter and, to a lesser extent, the fourth fiscal quarter. The second fiscal quarter tends to be the lowest occupancy period at those four southern Arizona hotels. This seasonality pattern can be expected to cause fluctuations in the Trusts quarterly revenues. The two hotels located in California and New Mexico historically experience their most profitable periods during the second and third fiscal quarters (the summer season), providing some balance to the general seasonality of the hotel business. To the extent that cash flows from operations is insufficient during any quarter, due to temporary or seasonal fluctuations in lease revenue, the Trust may utilize other cash on hand or borrowings to make distributions to its shareholders. No assurance can be given that the Trust will make distributions in the future.
5
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
See Item 6 - Selected Financial Data herein for information regarding the Trusts revenues, net income and losses, dividends, total assets, notes and advances payable to banks and others and notes and advances payable to related parties.
OTHER AVAILABLE INFORMATION
We also make available, free of charge, on our Internet website at
www.innsuitestrust.com, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly
reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and
amendments to reports filed or furnished pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as
reasonably practicable after we file such material with, or furnish it to, the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission). The public may read and copy any materials
that we file with the Commission at the Commissions Public Reference Room at
450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549 and may obtain information on
the Public Reference Room by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. The Commission maintains an Internet site
that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information
regarding issuers that file electronically with the Commission
(http://www.sec.gov).
Item 2. PROPERTIES
The Trust maintains its administrative offices at the InnSuites Hotels Centre in Phoenix, Arizona. On January 31, 2005, the Partnership owned five Hotels and the Trust owned one Hotel. All of the Hotels are operated as InnSuites® Hotels, while four are also marketed as Best Western® Hotels and one is also marketed as a Holiday Inn® Hotel and Suites. All of the Hotels operate in the following locations:
PROPERTY |
|
NUMBER
|
|
YEAR OF
|
|
MOST RECENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
InnSuites Hotel and Suites Airport Albuquerque Best Western |
|
101 |
|
1975/1985 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
InnSuites Hotel and Suites Phoenix Best Western |
|
104 |
|
1980 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
InnSuites Hotel and Suites Tucson, Catalina Foothills Best Western |
|
159 |
|
1981/1983 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
InnSuites Hotels and Suites Yuma |
|
166 |
|
1982/1984 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holiday Inn Airport Hotel and Suites/Ontario (an InnSuites Hotel)(2) |
|
150 |
|
1990 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
InnSuites Hotels and Suites Tucson St. Marys |
|
267 |
|
1960/1971 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total suites |
|
947 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) The Trust defines a renovation as the remodeling of more than 10% of a propertys available suites.
(2) Subsequent to January 31, 2005, the Trust ended its franchise agreement with Holiday Inn and entered into a franchise agreement with Best Western International for this property.
See Item 7 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations General herein for a discussion of occupancy rates at the Hotels.
See Note 5 to the Trusts Consolidated Financial Statements Mortgage Notes Payable herein for a discussion of mortgages encumbering the Hotels.
6
Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Trust is not a party to, nor are any of its properties subject to, any material litigation or environmental regulatory proceedings.
Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
The Trust held its 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on December 10, 2004. The nominees listed below were elected as Trustees of the Trust to hold office for a term expiring at the 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. Tabulated below is the number of Shares of Beneficial Interest cast for and withheld with respect to the election of the Trustee nominees:
Name |
|
For |
|
Withhold |
|
James F. Wirth |
|
2,117,824 |
|
13,280 |
|
Peter A. Thoma |
|
2,117,859 |
|
13,245 |
|
In addition to the election of Trustees, the security holders voted on the following matters at the Annual Meeting:
The issuance of 6,577,732 Shares of Beneficial Interest in exchange for the cancellation of indebtedness owed by the Trust to the Partnership.
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
1,419,501 |
|
22,955 |
|
7,647 |
|
The issuance of 4,969,712 Shares of Beneficial Interest in consideration of the Trusts acquisition of all general partner interests of Yuma Hospitality Properties, Ltd. which were held by the Partnership.
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
1,417,001 |
|
24,809 |
|
7,524 |
|
The issuance of 457,645 Shares of Beneficial Interest in exchange for the cancellation of indebtedness owed by the Trust to certain affiliates of Mr. Wirth.
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
1,411,238 |
|
31,341 |
|
7,524 |
|
The issuance of 1,000,000 Shares of Beneficial Interest upon the conversion of 1,000,000 Class B limited partnership units in the Partnership into Shares of Beneficial Interest by Mr. Wirth and certain of his affiliates.
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
1,410,991 |
|
31,312 |
|
7,800 |
|
PART II
Item 5. MARKET FOR THE TRUSTS SHARES AND RELATED SECURITY HOLDER MATTERS
The Trusts Shares of Beneficial Interest are traded on the American Stock Exchange under the symbol IHT. On April 22, 2005, the Trust had 8,906,429 shares outstanding and 525 holders of record.
7
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices of the Trusts Shares of Beneficial Interest, as quoted by the American Stock Exchange, as well as dividends declared thereon:
Fiscal Year 2005 |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Dividends |
|
First Quarter |
|
2.25 |
|
1.60 |
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
2.25 |
|
1.48 |
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
1.63 |
|
1.49 |
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
1.95 |
|
1.12 |
|
.01 |
|
Fiscal Year 2004 |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Dividends |
|
First Quarter |
|
1.80 |
|
1.30 |
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
1.40 |
|
1.20 |
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
1.70 |
|
1.15 |
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
2.25 |
|
1.05 |
|
.02 |
|
The Trust intends to maintain a conservative dividend policy to facilitate the reduction of debt and internal growth. In fiscal years 2005 and 2004, the Trust paid dividends of $0.01 and $0.02 per share, respectively, in the fourth quarter of each year.
On January 2, 2001, the Board of Trustees approved a share repurchase program under Rule 10b18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the purchase of up to 250,000 limited partnership units in the Partnership and/or Shares of Beneficial Interest in open market or privately negotiated transactions. Additionally, on September 10, 2002, the Board of Trustees approved the purchase of up to 350,000 additional limited partnership units in the Partnership and/or Shares of Beneficial Interest in open market or privately negotiated transactions. Acquired Shares of Beneficial Interest will be held in treasury and will be available for future acquisitions and financings and/or for awards granted under the InnSuites Hospitality Trust 1997 Stock Incentive and Option Plan. During the three months ended January 31, 2005, the Trust acquired 32,300 Shares of Beneficial Interest in open market transactions at an average price of $1.56 per share. The Trust intends to continue repurchasing Shares of Beneficial Interest in compliance with applicable legal and American Stock Exchange requirements. The Trust remains authorized to repurchase an additional 47,765 limited partnership units and/or Shares of Beneficial Interest pursuant to the share repurchase program, which has no expiration date.
|
|
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
|
|||||||
Period |
|
Total Number
|
|
Average Price
|
|
Total Number of Shares
|
|
Maximum Number of
|
|
|
November 1 November 30, 2004 |
|
200 |
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
200 |
|
79,865 |
|
December 1 December 31, 2004 |
|
22,900 |
|
$ |
1.61 |
|
22,900 |
|
56,965 |
|
January 1 January 31, 2005 |
|
9,200 |
|
$ |
1.45 |
|
9,200 |
|
47,765 |
|
See Part III, Item 12 for a description of our equity compensation plans.
Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected financial data of the Trust as of and for the five fiscal years ended January 31, 2005, has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of the Trust. The consolidated financial statements of the Trust as of and for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2005 were audited by Epstein, Weber & Conover, P.L.C., independent public accountants. The consolidated financial statements of the Trust as of and for the two fiscal years ended January 31, 2004 and 2003 were audited by McGladrey & Pullen, LLP, independent public accountants. The consolidated financial statements of the Trust as of and for the two fiscal years ended January 31, 2002 and 2001 were audited by KPMG, LLP, independent public accountants.
See Item 1 Business herein for a discussion of the change in the nature of the business of the Trust over the course of the years presented above. As a result, the information presented above is not comparative from year to year.
8
Item 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
The Trust is engaged in the ownership and operation of hotel properties. At January 31, 2005, the InnSuites system included six moderate and full-service hotels with 947 hotel suites. Certain of our Hotels are branded through franchise agreements, which include four Best Western hotels and one Holiday Inn hotel. Subsequent to January 31, 2005, the Trust ended its franchise agreement with Holiday Inn and entered into a franchise agreement with Best Western International for the Trusts Ontario, California property. All six Hotels are trademarked as InnSuites Hotels. We are also involved in various operations incidental to the operation of hotels, such as the operation of restaurants and meeting/banquet room rentals.
Our operations consist of one reportable segment, hotel ownership, which derives its revenue from the operation of the Hotels. In addition, we receive management fees and trademark license fees.
Our results are significantly affected by occupancy and room rates at the Hotels, our ability to manage costs, and changes in the number of available suites caused by acquisition and disposition activities. Results are also impacted by overall economic conditions and conditions in the travel industry. Unfavorable changes in these factors could negatively impact hotel room demand and pricing which would reduce our profit margins on rented suites. Additionally, our ability to manage costs could be adversely impacted by significant increases in operating expenses, resulting in lower operating margins.
We anticipate that the improved economic conditions, combined with the disposition of previously underperforming properties, will create opportunities for the Trust in fiscal year 2006. Better overall economic conditions are expected to result in increased business and leisure travel and support higher room rates, and therefore higher operating margins. Challenges in fiscal year 2006 are expected to include continued competition for group business in the markets in which we operate and the Trusts ability to increase room rates while maintaining market share. We will continue to focus on managing our costs, achieving increased daily rates in the markets where we operate and building occupancy. We believe that our focus on customer service, adding more two-room suites and leveraging technology will enable us to remain competitive.
Effective February 1, 2004, the Trust relinquished its REIT status. As of that date, any distributions to its shareholders are not deductible for purposes of computing the Trusts taxable income and the Trust will be subject to income tax, including any applicable alternative minimum tax, on its taxable income at regular corporate rates, without offset for distributions of such income to its shareholders.
GENERAL
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Trusts consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.
The accounting policies that we believe are most critical and involve the most subjective judgments include our estimates and assumptions of future revenue and expenditures used to project property cash flows. Future cash flows are used in the valuation calculation of our hotel properties to determine the recoverability (or impairment) of the carrying amounts in the event management is required to test the asset for recoverability of its carrying value under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the estimated future cash flows over its estimated remaining life, the Trust recognizes an impairment expense to reduce the assets carrying value to its fair value. Fair value is determined by either the most current third-party property appraisal, if available, or the present value of future cash flows over the remaining life of the asset. Our evaluation of future cash flows is based on our historical experience and other factors, including certain economic conditions and committed future bookings. See - Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates below.
At January 31, 2005, the Trust owned a 64.8% interest in five of the Hotels through its sole general partners interest in the Partnership and owned a 99.9% interest in one Hotel. The Trust purchased 532,077, 57,509 and 257,101 Partnership units during the years ended January 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Prior to May 1, 2004, the Partnership leased its hotel properties to InnSuites Hotels. The corresponding rent expense for InnSuites Hotels and rent revenue for the Partnership, as well as the resulting rent receivable and payable, eliminate in consolidation. On May 1, 2004, the percentage lease agreements between the Partnership and InnSuites Hotels were terminated. During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2004, the Partnership agreed to waive InnSuites Hotels accrued but
9
unpaid rent in exchange for InnSuites Hotels extending its lease agreements one year. The total amount waived was $3,134,130. This transaction had a net effect of increasing the Trusts stockholders equity by $1,518,834.
The expenses of the Trust consist primarily of property taxes, insurance, corporate overhead, interest on mortgage debt, professional fees, depreciation of the Hotels, management and trademark fees to affiliates and hotel operating expenses. Under the terms of its Partnership Agreement, the Partnership is required to reimburse the Trust for all such expenses. Accordingly, management believes that a review of the historical performance of the operations of the Hotels, particularly with respect to occupancy, average daily rate (ADR), calculated as total room revenue divided by number of rooms sold, and revenue per available room (REVPAR), calculated as total room revenue divided by number of rooms available, is appropriate for understanding revenue from the Hotels. ADR increased by $4.56 to $70.83 in fiscal year 2005 from $66.27 in fiscal year 2004. Occupancy increased 5.76% to 68.55% in fiscal year 2005 from 62.79% in fiscal year 2004 primarily as a result of the disposition of lower-occupancy properties. These dispositions also resulted in an increase in REVPAR of $6.94 to $48.55 in fiscal year 2005 from $41.61 in fiscal year 2004.
The following table shows certain historical financial and other information for the periods indicated:
|
|
For the Year Ended January 31, |
|
|||||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Occupancy |
|
68.55 |
% |
62.79 |
% |
60.46 |
% |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Average Daily Rate (ADR) |
|
$ |
70.83 |
|
$ |
66.27 |
|
$ |
66.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Revenue Per Available Room (REVPAR) |
|
$ |
48.55 |
|
$ |
41.61 |
|
$ |
40.26 |
|
No assurance can be given that the trends reflected in this data will continue or that occupancy, ADR and REVPAR will not decrease as a result of changes in national or local economic or hospitality industry conditions.
The Trust enters into transactions with certain related parties from time to time. For information relating to such related party transactions see the following:
For a discussion of management and licensing agreements with certain related parties, see Item 1 Business Acquisition of Management and Licensing Contracts.
For a discussion of acquisitions involving certain related parties, see Item 1 Business Acquisition of InnSuites Hotels by the Trust.
For a discussion of the sales of the Trusts Scottsdale, Flagstaff and Tempe, Arizona hotels to a related party during fiscal years 2004 and 2005, see Item 1 Business Sale of Hotel Properties and Note 19 to the Trusts Consolidated Financial Statements Hotel Properties Held for Sale and Sale of Hotel Properties.
For a discussion of guarantees of the Trusts mortgage notes payable by certain related parties, see Note 5 to the Trusts Consolidated Financial Statements Mortgage Notes Payable.
For a discussion of notes and advances payable by the Trust to certain related parties, see Note 7 to the Trusts Consolidated Financial Statements Notes and Advances Payable to Related Parties.
For a discussion of the Trusts employment agreement with Mr. Wirth, see Note 12 to the Trusts Consolidated Financial Statements Advisory Agreement/Employment Agreements.
10
Results of Operations of the Trust for the year ended January 31, 2005 compared to the year ended January 31, 2004.
Overview
A summary of operating results for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2005 and 2004 is:
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Change |
|
% Change |
|
|||
Revenue |
|
$ |
22,875,187 |
|
$ |
24,211,328 |
|
$ |
(1,336,141 |
) |
(5.5 |
)% |
Operating Loss |
|
$ |
(221,647 |
) |
$ |
(272,479 |
) |
$ |
50,832 |
|
18.7 |
% |
Net Income (Loss) |
|
$ |
240,442 |
|
$ |
(2,594,317 |
) |
$ |
2,834,759 |
|
>100.0 |
% |
Income (Loss) Per Share Basic and Diluted |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
$ |
(1.27 |
) |
$ |
1.37 |
|
>100.0 |
% |
The Trusts overall results in 2005 were positively affected by the disposition of certain of its underperforming properties, the impact of which was partially offset by expenses related to its acquisition of the management and licensing contracts from the Management Company, which will eliminate those expenses in future years.
For the twelve months ended January 31, 2005, the Trust had total revenue of $22.9 million compared to $24.2 million for the twelve months ended January 31, 2004, a decrease of approximately $1.3 million. This decrease in total revenue is primarily due to the sale of the Tempe, Arizona and San Diego, California properties in the first quarter of fiscal year 2005. Total expenses of $25.3 million for the twelve months ended January 31, 2005 reflect a decrease of approximately $2.5 million compared to total expenses of $27.9 million for the twelve months ended January 31, 2004. The decrease is primarily due to the sales of the Tempe, Arizona and San Diego, California properties in the first quarter of fiscal year 2005 and an impairment charge of $458,000 related to the Buena Park, California and Tempe, Arizona properties in fiscal year 2004.
Loss on impairment of hotel property was approximately $458,000 for the twelve months ended January 31, 2004. This loss resulted from write-downs for impairments of the Buena Park, California and Tempe, Arizona hotel properties. During fiscal year 2004, the Trust entered into purchase agreements related to both properties at amounts below their carrying values. The Buena Park, California property was written down by $329,000 to its fair value of $6.5 million, which was its subsequent sales price. The Tempe, Arizona property was written down by $129,000 to its fair value of $6.8 million, which was its subsequent sales price. See Note 19 to the Trusts Consolidated Financial Statements - Hotels Held for Sale and Sale of Hotel Properties. No such loss was recorded for the twelve months ended January 31, 2005.
General and administrative expenses include overhead charges for management, accounting, shareholder and legal services for the Trust. In comparing general and administrative expenses for the twelve months ended January 31, 2005 and 2004, these expenses decreased $258,000, or 5.5%, to $4.4 million in fiscal year 2005, from $4.7 million in fiscal year 2004. This decrease was primarily due to elimination of management and franchise fees paid by the Trust due to the consolidation of the Management Company and Licensing Corp. and subsequent purchase of those contracts, offset by the increased expenses to effect those transactions.
Total operating expenses for the twelve months ended January 31, 2005 were $23.1 million, a decrease of approximately $1.4 million, or 5.7%, from $24.5 million in the twelve months ended January 31, 2004. The decrease was primarily due to the sales of the Tempe, Arizona and San Diego, California properties during the first quarter of fiscal year 2005 and impairment charges of $458,000 recognized during fiscal year 2004.
Total interest expense for the twelve months ended January 31, 2005 was $2.3 million, a decrease of $1.1 million, or 33.0%, from $3.4 million in the twelve months ended January 31, 2004. Interest on mortgage notes payable for the twelve months ended January 31, 2005 was $2.1 million, a decrease of $675,000, or 24.4%, from $2.8 million in the twelve months ended January 31, 2004. The decrease is primarily due to the satisfaction of the mortgage notes payable secured by the Tempe, Arizona and San Diego, California properties in connection with the disposition of those properties. Interest on notes payable to banks for the twelve months ended January 31, 2005 was $24,000, a decrease of $30,000, or 56.2%, from $54,000 in the prior fiscal year, due to the Trust satisfying in full its term loan in March 2003 and its line of credit in full in August 2003. Interest on notes payable to related parties decreased 77.0%, or $419,000, to $125,000 from $544,000 during the years ended January 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The decrease is primarily due to payments totaling $6.2 million on notes due to affiliates of Mr. Wirth in connection with the sales of the Tempe, Arizona and San Diego, California properties during the first quarter of fiscal year 2005.
Real estate and personal property taxes, insurance and ground rent decreased $340,000, or 20.4%, to $1.3 million from $1.7 million in comparing the twelve months ended January 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Real estate and personal
11
property taxes and property insurance decreased due to the sales of the Tempe, Arizona and San Diego, California properties during the first quarter of fiscal year 2005 and the sale of the Buena Park, California property during the third quarter of fiscal year 2004.
Hotel property depreciation for the twelve months ended January 31, 2005 compared to 2004 decreased approximately $222,000, or 7.5%, to $2.8 million from $3.0 million, respectively. The decrease was primarily due to the sale of certain hotel properties.
The Trust had income before minority interest, income taxes and cumulative effect of adoption of accounting principle of $2.6 million for the twelve months ended January 31, 2005, compared to a loss before minority interest of $3.6 million in the prior year. After deducting the income allocated to the minority interest of $1.4 million, taxes of $160,000 and the cumulative effect of adoption of accounting principle of $854,402, the Trust had net income attributable to Shares of Beneficial Interest of approximately $240,000. This represented an increase of approximately $2.7 million attributable to Shares of Beneficial Interest comparing the twelve months ended January 31, 2005 and 2004. Basic and diluted net income per share was $0.10 for the twelve months ended January 31, 2005, compared to a loss of $1.27 for 2004.
Results of Operations of the Trust for the year ended January 31, 2004 compared to the year ended January 31, 2003.
Overview
A summary of operating results for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2004 and 2003 is:
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
Change |
|
% Change |
|
|||
Revenue |
|
$ |
24,211,328 |
|
$ |
26,940,473 |
|
$ |
(2,729,145 |
) |
(10.1 |
)% |
Operating Loss |
|
$ |
(272,479 |
) |
$ |
(1,080,639 |
) |
$ |
808,160 |
|
74.8 |
% |
Net Loss |
|
$ |
(2,594,317 |
) |
$ |
(3,445,948 |
) |
$ |
851,631 |
|
24.7 |
% |
Loss Per Share Basic and Diluted |
|
$ |
(1.27 |
) |
$ |
(1.67 |
) |
$ |
0.40 |
|
24.0 |
% |
The Trusts overall results in both 2004 and 2003 were adversely affected by the sluggish economic environment and reduced travel due to the war in Iraq and other terror concerns. Decreased demand in both the leisure travel, particularly in southern California, and business travel markets resulted in declining revenues during fiscal year 2004.
For the twelve months ended January 31, 2004, the Trust had total revenue of $24.2 million compared to $26.9 million for the twelve months ended January 31, 2003, a decrease of approximately $2.7 million. This decrease in total revenue is primarily due to fewer occupied rooms and the absence of revenue from the Scottsdale, Arizona property due to its sale in the first quarter of fiscal year 2004, and from the Flagstaff, Arizona and Buena Park, California properties, which were sold in the third quarter of fiscal year 2004. Total expenses of $27.9 million for the twelve months ended January 31, 2004 reflect a decrease of approximately $4.0 million compared to total expenses of $31.9 million for the twelve months ended January 31, 2003. The decrease is primarily due to the impairment charge of $590,000 related to the Scottsdale property in fiscal year 2003, reduced hotel expenses as a result of reduced occupied rooms and the absence of expenses from the Scottsdale, Flagstaff and Buena Park properties due to their sale in fiscal year 2004.
Loss on impairment of hotel property was approximately $458,000 for the twelve months ended January 31, 2004. This loss resulted from the write-downs for impairments of the Buena Park, California and Tempe, Arizona hotel properties. During fiscal year 2004, the Trust entered into purchase agreements related to both properties at amounts below their carrying values. The Buena Park, California property was written down by $329,000 to its fair value of $6.5 million, which was its subsequent sales price. The Tempe, Arizona property was written down by $129,000 to its fair value of $6.8 million, which was its subsequent sales price. See Note 19 to the Trusts Consolidated Financial Statements Hotels Held for Sale and Sale of Hotel Properties. Loss on impairment of hotel property was approximately $590,000 for the twelve months ended January 31, 2003. This loss resulted from the write-down for an impairment of the Scottsdale, Arizona hotel property. The operating performance of the Scottsdale property during that period indicated that it significantly decreased in value, which required management to test the property for recoverability of book value under SFAS No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of. Based on an appraisal of the propertys fair value, the hotel propertys carrying value was determined not to be recoverable. The hotel property, including land, buildings and improvements and furniture, fixtures and equipment, was written down by $590,000 to its fair value and new basis of $3.1 million. The amount of impairment allocated to Shares of Beneficial Interest was $294,000 and the amount allocated to minority interest was $296,000. The hotel propertys decrease in value was due to changes in the economic conditions, and decreased prospects for future development, in its immediate area. During fiscal year 2004, the impaired property was sold to Scottsdale Eldorado Resort, LLC, an affiliate of Mr. Wirth, for $3.1 million.
12
General and administrative expenses include overhead charges for management, accounting, shareholder and legal services for the Trust. In comparing general and administrative expenses for the twelve months ended January 31, 2004 and 2003, these expenses decreased $1.1 million, or 19.0%, to $4.7 million in fiscal year 2004, from $5.8 million in fiscal year 2003. This decrease was primarily due to $91,000 of expense related to the refinancing of the Tucson St. Marys and San Diego properties in fiscal year 2003, a decrease of $242,000 in trademark and management fees in fiscal year 2004 due to amendments to the related contracts, and the absence of such expenses from the Scottsdale, Buena Park and Flagstaff properties due to their sale during the first quarter of fiscal year 2004.
Total operating expenses for the twelve months ended January 31, 2004 were $24.5 million, a decrease of approximately $3.5 million, or 12.6%, from $28.0 million in the twelve months ended January 31, 2003. The decrease was primarily due to the impairment charge of $590,000 related to the Scottsdale property in fiscal year 2003, reduced hotel expenses as a result of reduced revenue and the absence of expenses from the Scottsdale, Buena Park and Flagstaff properties due to their sale in the first quarter of fiscal year 2004.
Total interest expense for the twelve months ended January 31, 2004 was $3.4 million, a decrease of $424,000, or 11.2%, from $3.8 million in the twelve months ended January 31, 2003. Interest on mortgage notes payable for the twelve months ended January 31, 2004 was $2.8 million, a decrease of $165,000, or 5.6%, from $2.9 million in the twelve months ended January 31, 2003. Interest on notes payable to banks for the twelve months ended January 31, 2004 was $54,000, a decrease of $111,000, or 67.4%, from $165,000 in the prior fiscal year, due to the Trust satisfying in full its term loan in March 2003 and its line of credit in full in August 2003. Interest on notes payable to related parties decreased 21.4%, or $148,000, to $544,000 from $692,000 due to a decrease of $2.9 million in net borrowings from Mr. Wirth and his affiliates.
Real estate and personal property taxes, insurance and ground rent decreased $219,000, or 11.6%, to $1.7 million from $1.9 million in comparing the twelve months ended January 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Real estate and personal property taxes and property insurance decreased due to the sale of the Scottsdale property in the first quarter of fiscal year 2004 and decreased property tax assessments at certain hotels.
Hotel property depreciation for the twelve months ended January 31, 2004 compared to 2003 decreased approximately $418,000, or 12.3%, to $3.0 million from $3.4 million, respectively. The decrease was primarily due to the sale of certain hotel properties and the cessation of depreciation on hotel properties classified as held for sale.
The Trust had a loss before minority interest of $3.6 million for the twelve months ended January 31, 2004, compared to a loss before minority interest of $4.9 million in the prior year. After deducting the loss allocated to the minority interest of $1.0 million, the Trust had a net loss attributable to Shares of Beneficial Interest of approximately $2.6 million. This represented a decrease in total net loss of approximately $852,000 attributable to Shares of Beneficial Interest comparing the twelve months ended January 31, 2004 and 2003. Basic and diluted net loss per share was $1.27 for the twelve months ended January 31, 2004, compared to $1.67 for 2003.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview
Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $660,000, $88,000, and $1.1 million for the years ended January 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase in 2005 as compared to 2004 was primarily due to better operating results. The decrease in 2004 as compared to 2003 was primarily due to the Trusts efforts to reduce its liabilities, especially trade payables.
Net cash provided by or used in investing activities totaled $8.0 million, $10.2 million, and $(1.6) million for the years ended January 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The decrease in 2005 as compared to 2004 was primarily due to fewer dispositions in fiscal year 2005. The increase in 2004 as compared to 2003 was primarily due to the sale of certain Hotels during fiscal year 2004.
Net cash provided by or used in financing activities totaled $(8.6) million, $(10.4) million, and $513,000 for the years ended January 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase in 2005 as compared to 2004 was primarily due to reduced net payments on notes payable to Mr. Wirth and his affiliates during fiscal year 2005. The decrease in 2004 as compared to 2003 was primarily due to the sale of certain Hotels in fiscal year 2004, the proceeds of which the Trust used to reduce its debt balances to related parties and satisfy its mortgage notes on these properties.
13
The Trust received $9.4 million in proceeds for the sales of hotel properties in fiscal year 2005. The Trust used $4.8 million of these proceeds to satisfy a mortgage note payable, $1.4 million to satisfy related party notes and interest payable, and retained the remaining proceeds to reduce trade payables and to fund future operations and capital improvements.
The Trust received $12.2 million in proceeds for the sales of hotel properties in fiscal year 2004. The Trust used $3.0 million of these proceeds to satisfy a mortgage note payable, $4.4 million to satisfy related party notes payable, $3.0 million to satisfy bank notes payable and the remaining proceeds to fund operations.
The Trusts principal source of cash to meet its cash requirements, including distributions to its shareholders, is its share of the Partnerships cash flow and, as of January 31, 2005, its direct ownership of the Yuma, Arizona property. The Partnerships principal source of revenue after May 1, 2004 is hotel operations for the five properties it owns. The Trusts liquidity, including its ability to make distributions to its shareholders, will depend upon the ability of itself and the Partnership to generate sufficient cash flow from hotel operations.
Historically, as a REIT, the Trust was required to distribute to its shareholders at least 90% of its taxable income, excluding net capital gains. The termination of the Trusts status as a REIT, effective February 1, 2004, eliminated this requirement. However, by relinquishing its status as a REIT, the Trust will become subject to the payment of income taxes.
As of January 31, 2004, the Trust has no commitments for capital expenditures beyond a 4% reserve for refurbishment and replacements that is set aside annually, as described below.
The Trust is obligated under loan agreements relating to five of its hotels to deposit 4% of the individual hotels room revenue into an escrow account to be used for capital expenditures. These accounts are restricted by the mortgage lenders. As of January 31, 2005, $250,642 was held in these accounts and is reported on the Trusts Consolidated Balance Sheet as Restricted Cash. The accounts are required to be used for capital improvements to the Hotels and refurbishment and replacement of furniture, fixtures and equipment. During the twelve months ended January 31, 2005 and 2004, the Hotels spent approximately $1.3 million and $1.8 million, respectively, for capital expenditures. The Trust considers the majority of these improvements to be revenue producing. Therefore, these amounts have been capitalized and are being depreciated over their estimated useful lives. The Trust plans to spend approximately $691,000 for capital expenditures in fiscal year 2006. The Hotels also spent approximately $1.4 million and $1.8 million during fiscal years 2005 and 2004, respectively, on repairs and maintenance and these amounts have been charged to expense as incurred.
The Trust has minimum debt payments of $1.7 million and $1.2 million due during fiscal years 2006 and 2007, respectively. The Trust plans to renew its bank line of credit when it matures during fiscal year 2006. The Trust believes it can satisfy its remaining obligations during fiscal years 2006 and 2007 using revenue generated by the Hotels operations.
Management believes that cash on hand, future cash receipts from operations, proceeds from hotel sales and borrowings from affiliates in fiscal year 2006 will be sufficient to meet the Trusts obligations as they become due for the next twelve months.
The Trust may seek to negotiate additional credit facilities or issue debt instruments. Any debt incurred or issued by the Trust may be secured or unsecured, long-term, medium-term or short-term, bear interest at a fixed or variable rate and be subject to such other terms as the Trust considers prudent.
The Trust will acquire or develop additional hotels only as suitable opportunities arise, and the Trust will not undertake acquisition or redevelopment of properties unless adequate sources of financing are available. Funds for future acquisitions or development of hotels are expected to be derived, in whole or in part, from borrowings or from the proceeds of additional issuances of Shares of Beneficial Interest or other securities. However, there can be no assurance that the Trust will successfully acquire or develop additional hotels or that proceeds from borrowings or issuances of Shares of Beneficial Interest will be available or in amounts and on terms sufficient to allow such transactions.
CONTINUED LISTING WITH THE AMERICAN STOCK EXCHANGE
On June 13, 2003, the Trust received notice from the American Stock Exchange (Amex) indicating that the Trust failed to meet certain of Amexs continued listing standards as set forth under Section 1003(a) of the Amex Company Guide. The Trust became non-compliant with Amexs continued listing standards due to losses incurred by the Trust in its most recent fiscal years. These losses were exacerbated by the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, the war in Iraq during the spring of 2003, as well as the general slowdown in the economy and travel.
14
In response to this notice, the Trust was given the opportunity to submit a plan to Amex to regain compliance with the continued listing standards. On August 26, 2003, Amex notified the Trust that it had accepted the Trusts plan and granted the Trust the opportunity to regain compliance with Amexs continued listing standards.
On December 10, 2004, the shareholders of the Trust approved several proposals relating to the Trusts plan to return to compliance with Amexs continued listing standards. On January 4, 2005, the Board of Trustees approved the implementation of the proposals. The proposals were consummated on January 31, 2005, and resulted in:
The Trust issuing 6,577,732 Shares of Beneficial Interest in the Trust to the Partnership to satisfy advances and interest payable to the Partnership totaling approximately $8.6 million. The Partnership concurrently distributed the Shares of Beneficial Interest to its unit holders. Of the 6,577,732 Shares of Beneficial Interest distributed by the Partnership, 3,761,071 were returned to the Trust and became treasury shares. The remaining 2,816,661 Shares of Beneficial Interest remained outstanding.
The Trust issuing 4,969,712 Shares of Beneficial Interest in the Trust, with a fair value of approximately $6.5 million, to the Partnership to acquire its ownership interest in Yuma Hospitality Properties, Ltd., which owns and operates the Yuma, Arizona hotel property. The Partnership concurrently distributed the Shares of Beneficial Interest to its unit holders. Of the 4,969,712 Shares of Beneficial Interest distributed by the Partnership, 2,841,624 were returned to the Trust and became treasury shares. The remaining 2,128,088 Shares of Beneficial Interest remained outstanding. The fair value was determined using the carrying values of assets and liabilities, except for fixed assets, which were valued using appraised value. The portion of the excess of fair value over book value that relates to the minority interest in the Partnership totals $1.2 million, and has been recorded as an increase in the basis of those fixed assets.
The Trust issuing 457,645 Shares of Beneficial Interest in the Trust to satisfy $594,938 of notes and interest payable to affiliates of Mr. Wirth. All of those Shares of Beneficial Interest remained outstanding.
The Trust issuing 1,000,000 Shares of Beneficial Interest in the Trust to Mr. Wirth and his affiliates upon conversion of 1,000,000 Class B limited partnership units in the Partnership, which increased the Trusts ownership interest in the Partnership by 7.6%. All of those Shares of Beneficial Interest remained outstanding.
In total, the Trust issued 13,005,089 Shares of Beneficial Interest in the Trust, of which 6,602,695 returned to the Trust as treasury shares and 6,402,394 remained outstanding. Mr. Wirth and his affiliates, through these transactions, received 5,182,186 Shares of Beneficial Interest in the Trust.
As of January 31, 2005, the Trust has total shareholders equity of $6.3 million, which exceeds the minimum amount of $6.0 million required to regain compliance with Amexs continued listing standards.
SHARE REPURCHASE PROGRAM
On January 2, 2001, the Board of Trustees of the Trust approved a share repurchase program under Rule 10b-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for the purchase of up to 250,000 limited partnership units in the Partnership and/or Shares of Beneficial Interest in open market or privately negotiated transactions. Additionally, on September 10, 2002, the Board of Trustees approved the purchase of up to 350,000 additional limited partnership units in the Partnership and/or Shares of Beneficial Interest in open market or privately negotiated transactions. Acquired Shares of Beneficial Interest are held in treasury and are available for future acquisitions and financings and/or for awards granted under the Trusts 1997 Stock Incentive and Option Plan. During fiscal year 2005, the Trust acquired 130,717 Shares of Beneficial Interest in open market and privately negotiated transactions at an average price of $1.73 per share, and 532,077 limited partnership units in privately negotiated transactions at an average price of $2.17 per unit. The Trust intends to continue repurchasing Shares of Beneficial Interest in compliance with applicable legal and Amex requirements. The Trust is authorized to repurchase an additional 40,133 limited partnership units and/or Shares of Beneficial Interest pursuant to the share repurchase program.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET FINANCINGS AND LIABILITIES
Other than lease commitments, legal contingencies incurred in the normal course of business and employment contracts for key employees, the Trust does not have any off-balance sheet financing arrangements or liabilities. The Trust does not have any majority-owned subsidiaries that are not included in the consolidated financial statements. See Item 7 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Accounting Matters below for a discussion of new accounting interpretations with respect to variable interest entities and the impact of such interpretations on
15
the Trust. See also Note 2 to the Trusts Consolidated Financial Statements Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Application of New Accounting Standards.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The following summarizes our contractual obligations at January 31, 2005, and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods:
|
|
PAYMENTS DUE BY PERIOD |
|
|||||||||||||
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS |
|
TOTAL |
|
LESS
|
|
1-3
|
|
3-5
|
|
THEREAFTER |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Mortgage notes payable, notes payable to banks, other notes payable and notes and advances payable to related parties |
|
$ |
24,849,370 |
|
$ |
1,673,537 |
|
$ |
2,564,700 |
|
$ |
6,643,302 |
|
$ |
13,967,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Operating leases |
|
7,128,793 |
|
196,186 |
|
392,372 |
|
392,372 |
|
6,147,863 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
TOTAL |
|
$ |
31,978,163 |
|
$ |
1,869,723 |
|
$ |
2,957,072 |
|
$ |
7,035,674 |
|
$ |
20,115,694 |
|
InnSuites Hotels has entered into franchise arrangements with certain third parties for five of the hotel properties, with four Best Western hotels and one Holiday Inn hotel. Subsequent to January 31, 2005, the Trust ended its franchise agreement with Holiday Inn and entered into a franchise agreement with Best Western International for the Trusts Ontario, California property. These agreements provide for fees to be paid by InnSuites Hotels based on revenue and reservations received, and contain no minimum payment provisions.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The Trust believes that the policies it follows for the valuation of its hotel properties, which constitute the majority of Trust assets, are its most critical policies. The Trust applies SFAS No. 144 to determine when it is necessary to test an asset for recoverability. On an events and circumstances basis, the Trust reviews the carrying value of its hotel properties both held for use and held for sale. The Trust will record an impairment loss and reduce the carrying value of a property when anticipated undiscounted future cash flows and/or a current appraisal of the property do not support its carrying value. In cases where the Trust does not expect to recover the carrying cost of hotel properties held for use, it will reduce the carrying value to the fair value of the hotel, as determined by a current appraisal. In cases where the Trust does not expect to recover the carrying cost of hotel properties held for sale, it will reduce the carrying value to the sales price less costs to sell. The Trust did not recognize impairment expense in fiscal year 2005. For the twelve months ended January 31, 2004 and 2003, the Trust recorded impairment losses of $458,000 and $590,000, respectively. As of January 31, 2005, the Trust management does not believe that the carrying values of any of its hotel properties are impaired.
ACCOUNTING MATTERS
In December 2004, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004) was issued. This Statement is a revision of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation, and supercedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. This Statement establishes standards for accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity securities for goods and services. The Trust is required to adopt this Statement as of August 31, 2005. The Trust believes that the adoption of this Statement will not affect future financial results, as all options granted by the Trust are fully vested.
In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, (SFAS No. 153), which is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. SFAS No. 153 replaces APB Opinion No. 29s exceptions to recording these transfers at fair value. SFAS No. 153 is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys financial statements or results of operations.
In February 2004, the Trust adopted FIN 46R, which amended FIN 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements. FIN 46R requires an existing unconsolidated variable interest entity to be consolidated by its primary beneficiary if the entity does not effectively
16
disperse risk among all parties involved or if other parties do not have significant capital to finance activities without subordinated financial support from the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary is the party that absorbs a majority of the entitys expected losses, receives a majority of its expected residual returns, or both, as a result of holding variable interests, which are the ownership, contractual or other pecuniary interests in an entity.
As of February 1, 2004, the Trust recorded a charge for the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle resulting from its recognition of the $854,000 net stockholders deficit of the Management Company, which was the Trusts variable interest entity under FIN 46R. The $854,000 charge represented the net effect of the Trust reporting $160,000 in net assets (consisting primarily of receivables) and $1,014,000 in net liabilities (consisting primarily of debt) upon consolidating the financial results of the Management Company.
All revenue and expense items for the Management Company and Licensing Corp. relating to services provided to the Hotels were eliminated when their financial results were consolidated with the Trusts results. Revenues and expenses relating to services provided by the Management Company and Licensing Corp. to hotels not owned by the Trust, however, were not eliminated. Payroll reimbursements shown in the current period represent amounts received from hotels not owned by the Trust.
The effect of consolidating the financial results of the Management Company and Licensing Corp. was accounted for as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. As a result of consolidating the financial results of the Management Company with its results, as of February 1, 2004, the Trusts financial results include a $854,402 charge for the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle on the Statements of Operations resulting in a reduction in its Stockholders Equity which represents the aggregate stockholders deficit reported by the Management Company as of February 1, 2004.
After June 8, 2004, consolidation of the financial results of the Management Company and Licensing Corp. is no longer required by FIN 46R since InnSuites Hotels acquired the management contracts and licensing agreements from the Management Company on that date. See Note 20 to the Trusts Consolidated Financial Statements Purchase of Management and Licensing Contracts.
INFLATION
The Trusts revenue is based on the underlying Hotel revenue. Therefore, the Trust relies entirely on the performance of the Hotels and InnSuites Hotels ability to increase revenue to keep pace with inflation. Operators of hotels in general, and InnSuites Hotels in particular, can change room rates quickly, but competitive pressures may limit InnSuites Hotels ability to raise rates faster than inflation.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements in this Form 10-K, including statements containing the phrases believes, intends, expects, anticipates, predicted, will be, should be, looking ahead or similar words, constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Trust intends that such forward-looking statements be subject to the safe harbors created by such Acts. These forward-looking statements include statements regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of the Trust, its Trustees or its officers in respect of (i) the declaration or payment of dividends; (ii) the leasing, management or operation of the Hotels; (iii) the adequacy of reserves for renovation and refurbishment; (iv) the Trusts financing plans; (v) the Trusts position regarding investments, acquisitions, developments, financings, conflicts of interest and other matters; (vi) the Trusts continued listing on Amex; and (vii) trends affecting the Trusts or any Hotels financial condition or results of operations.
These forward-looking statements reflect the Trusts current views in respect of future events and financial performance, but are subject to many uncertainties and factors relating to the operations and business environment of the Hotels which may cause the actual results of the Trust to differ materially from any future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Examples of such uncertainties include, but are not limited to:
fluctuations in hotel occupancy rates;
changes in room rental rates which may be charged by InnSuites Hotels in response to market rental rate changes or otherwise;
interest rate fluctuations;
changes in federal income tax laws and regulations;
17
competition;
any changes in the Trusts financial condition or operating results due to acquisitions or dispositions of hotel properties;
real estate and hospitality market conditions;
hospitality industry factors;
terrorist attacks or other acts of war;
outbreaks of communicable diseases;
natural disasters;
local or national economic and business conditions, including, without limitation, conditions which may affect public securities markets generally, the hospitality industry or the markets in which the Trust operates or will operate; and
uncertainties the Trust might encounter in changing from a REIT to a tax-paying entity.
The Trust does not undertake any obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Pursuant to Section 21E(b)(2)(E) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the qualifications set forth hereinabove are inapplicable to any forward-looking statements in this Form 10-K relating to the operations of the Partnership.
Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Trust is exposed to interest rate risk primarily as a result of its mortgage notes payable, notes payable to banks, other notes payable and notes and advances payable to related parties. The proceeds from these loans were used to maintain liquidity, fund capital expenditures and expand the Trusts real estate investment portfolio and operations. The Trusts interest rate risk management objective is to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flow and to lower its overall borrowing costs. To achieve its objectives, the Trust borrows using fixed rate debt, when possible. The Trust could enter into derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps, caps and treasury locks in order to mitigate its interest rate risk on a related financial instrument. To date, the Trust has not entered into any such derivative transactions.
The Trusts interest rate risk is monitored using a variety of techniques. The table below presents the principal amounts, weighted average interest rates, fair value and other terms required, by year of expected maturity, in order to evaluate the expected cash flow and sensitivity to interest rate changes.
|
|
Fiscal |
|
|||||||||||||||
Debt Type |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate debt (1) |
|
$ |
1,079,440 |
|
1,132,126 |
|
1,224,769 |
|
1,283,189 |
|
1,376,512 |
|
13,967,829 |
|
20,063,865 |
|
21,711,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest rate |
|
8.34 |
% |
8.34 |
% |
8.33 |
% |
8.33 |
% |
8.32 |
% |
8.30 |
% |
8.32 |
% |
7.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable rate debt (1) |
|
$ |
594,098 |
|
100,490 |
|
107,316 |
|
113,842 |
|
3,869,759 |
|
|
|
4,785,505 |
|
4,815,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate available on January 31, 2005 |
|
6.50 |
% |
6.50 |
% |
6.50 |
% |
6.50 |
% |
6.50 |
% |
6.50 |
% |
6.50 |
% |
6.50 |
% |
(1) The fair value of fixed rate debt and variable rate debt were determined based on current rates offered for fixed rate debt and variable rate LIBOR debt with similar risks and maturities.
The table incorporates only those exposures that exist as of January 31, 2005 and does not consider those exposures or positions, which would arise after that date. Moreover, because firm commitments are not represented in the table above, the information presented therein has limited predictive value. As a result, the Trusts interest rate fluctuations will depend on the exposures that arise during any particular period and future interest rates.
18
Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INNSUITES HOSPITALITY TRUST
LIST OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES
The following consolidated financial statements of InnSuites Hospitality Trust are included in Item 8:
The following financial statement schedules of InnSuites Hospitality Trust are included in Item 8:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other schedules are omitted, as the information is not required or is otherwise furnished.
19
REPO RT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of |
|
|
InnSuites Hospitality Trust |
|
|
Phoenix, Arizona: |
|
|
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of InnSuites Hospitality Trust and subsidiaries as of January 31, 2005 and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity/deficit and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion of these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of InnSuites Hospitality Trust and subsidiaries as of January 31, 2005 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/EPSTEIN, WEBER & CONOVER, PLC |
|
|
|
Scottsdale, Arizona |
|
May 5, 2005 |
20
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
InnSuites Hospitality Trust |
Phoenix, Arizona: |
Our audit was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole. The consolidated supplemental schedule III is presented for purposes of complying with the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and is not a part of the basic consolidated financial statements. This schedule has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in our audits of the basic consolidated financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/EPSTEIN, WEBER & CONOVER, PLC |
|
|
|
Scottsdale, Arizona |
|
May 5, 2005 |
21
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees
InnSuites Hospitality Trust and Subsidiaries
Phoenix, Arizona
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of InnSuites Hospitality Trust (the Trust) and Subsidiaries as of January 31, 2004 and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders (deficit) equity and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended January 31, 2004. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Trusts management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of InnSuites Hospitality Trust and Subsidiaries as of January 31, 2004 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended January 31, 2004 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP |
|
|
|
Phoenix, Arizona |
|
March 12, 2004 |
22
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees
InnSuites Hospitality Trust and Subsidiaries
Phoenix, Arizona
Our audits on the 2004 and 2003 financial statements were conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole. The related consolidated supplemental schedules III and IV are presented for purposes of complying with the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and are not a part of the basic consolidated financial statements. The schedules have been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in our audits of the basic consolidated financial statements and, in our opinion, are fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP |
|
|
|
Phoenix, Arizona |
|
March 12, 2004 |
23
INNSUITES HOSPITALITY TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
24
INNSUITES HOSPITALITY TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
YEARS ENDED JANUARY 31, |
|
|||||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|||
REVENUE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Room |
|
$ |
17,729,550 |
|
$ |
22,026,498 |
|
$ |
24,434,186 |
|
Food and Beverage |
|
1,238,808 |
|
1,363,216 |
|
1,514,896 |
|
|||
Telecommunications |
|
99,894 |
|
154,231 |
|
186,936 |
|
|||
Other |
|
736,873 |
|
667,383 |
|
804,455 |
|
|||
Management and Trademark Fees, including $115,105, $0 and $0 from related parties for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively |
|
278,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Payroll Reimbursements, including $2,191,474, $0 and $0 from related parties for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively |
|
2,791,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
TOTAL REVENUE |
|
22,875,187 |
|
24,211,328 |
|
26,940,473 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
OPERATING EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Room |
|
5,010,738 |
|
6,019,634 |
|
6,737,985 |
|
|||
Food and Beverage |
|
1,226,074 |
|
1,323,480 |
|
1,563,778 |
|
|||
Telecommunications |
|
226,559 |
|
311,408 |
|
310,682 |
|
|||
General and Administrative (includes $0, $741,537 and $584,734 of management and licensing fees to related parties for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively) |
|
4,445,613 |
|
4,703,160 |
|
5,809,698 |
|
|||
Sales and Marketing |
|
1,642,232 |
|
2,109,528 |
|
2,215,749 |
|
|||
Repairs and Maintenance |
|
1,387,407 |
|
1,797,719 |
|
1,893,859 |
|
|||
Hospitality |
|
827,166 |
|
1,066,854 |
|
1,237,379 |
|
|||
Utilities |
|
1,232,940 |
|
1,686,040 |
|
1,929,179 |
|
|||
Hotel Property Depreciation |
|
2,755,499 |
|
2,977,583 |
|
3,395,844 |
|
|||
Real Estate and Personal Property Taxes, Insurance and Ground Rent |
|
1,329,463 |
|
1,669,510 |
|
1,888,821 |
|
|||
Other |
|
221,969 |
|
360,490 |
|
448,451 |
|
|||
Payroll Costs Related to Management Contracts |
|
2,791,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Loss on Impairment of Hotel Property |
|
|
|
458,401 |
|
589,687 |
|
|||
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES (includes $0, $7,389,988 and $8,756,842 in contract labor expense to related party for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively) |
|
23,096,834 |
|
24,483,807 |
|
28,021,112 |
|
|||
OPERATING LOSS |
|
(221,647 |
) |
(272,479 |
) |
(1,080,639 |
) |
|||
Interest Income |
|
7,517 |
|
981 |
|
1,453 |
|
|||
Gain on Disposition of Hotels |
|
5,113,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
TOTAL OTHER INCOME |
|
5,121,057 |
|
981 |
|
1,453 |
|
|||
Interest on Mortgage Notes Payable |
|
2,089,708 |
|
2,764,876 |
|
2,930,253 |
|
|||
Interest on Notes Payable to Banks |
|
23,659 |
|
53,984 |
|
165,362 |
|
|||
Interest on Notes Payable and Advances Payable to Related Parties |
|
125,336 |
|
544,069 |
|
691,978 |
|
|||
Interest on Other Notes Payable |
|
20,878 |
|
10,290 |
|
9,549 |
|
|||
TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE |
|
2,259,581 |
|
3,373,219 |
|
3,797,142 |
|
|||
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE MINORITY INTEREST, INCOME TAXES AND CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF ADOPTION OF ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE |
|
2,639,829 |
|
(3,644,717 |
) |
(4,876,328 |
) |
|||
LESS MINORITY INTEREST |
|
1,384,985 |
|
(1,050,400 |
) |
(1,430,380 |
) |
|||
Income Tax Provision |
|
(160,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|||
INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST BEFORE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF ADOPTION OF ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE |
|
1,094,844 |
|
(2,594,317 |
) |
(3,445,948 |
) |
|||
CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF ADOPTION OF ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE |
|
(854,402 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|||
INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST |
|
$ |
240,442 |
|
$ |
(2,594,317 |
) |
$ |
(3,445,948 |
) |
INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE BEFORE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF ADOPTION OF ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE Basic and Diluted |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
$ |
(1.27 |
) |
$ |
(1.67 |
) |
NET LOSS FROM CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF ADOPTION OF ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE Basic and Diluted |
|
(0.35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|||
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE Basic and Diluted |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
$ |
(1.27 |
) |
$ |
(1.67 |
) |
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING Basic and Diluted |
|
2,424,837 |
|
2,035,200 |
|
2,068,508 |
|
|||
CASH DIVIDENDS PER SHARE |
|
$ |
.01 |
|
$ |
.02 |
|
$ |
.01 |
|
See accompanying notes to
consolidated financial statements
25
INNSUITES
HOSPITALITY TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
SHAREHOLDERS
(DEFICIT) EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2005, 2004 AND 2003
BALANCE, JANUARY 31, 2002 |
|
$ |
1,526,816 |
|
Net Loss Attributable to Shares of Beneficial Interest |
|
(3,445,948 |
) |
|
Dividends |
|
(20,010 |
) |
|
Purchase of Treasury Stock |
|
(382,135 |
) |
|
Issuance of Shares of Beneficial Interest for Compensation |
|
80,858 |
|
|
Related Party Fees Forgiven |
|
534,599 |
|
|
Related Party Debt Forgiven |
|
529,046 |
|
|
Reallocation of Minority Interest |
|
(73,408 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, JANUARY 31, 2003 |
|
(1,250,182 |
) |
|
Net Loss Attributable to Shares of Beneficial Interest |
|
(2,594,317 |
) |
|
Dividends |
|
(40,986 |
) |
|
Purchase of Treasury Stock |
|
(29,095 |
) |
|
Issuance of Shares of Beneficial Interest |
|
99,680 |
|
|
Related Party Fees Forgiven |
|
530,721 |
|
|
Accrued Rent Forgiven by the Partnership |
|
1,518,834 |
|
|
Proceeds from Sale of Hotel Property to Related Party in Excess of Carrying Value |
|
192,910 |
|
|
Distribution to Minority Interest Holders |
|
(128,049 |
) |
|
Reallocation of Minority Interest |
|
126,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, JANUARY 31, 2004 |
|
(1,573,599 |
) |
|
Net Income Attributable to Shares of Beneficial Interest |
|
240,442 |
|
|
Dividends |
|
(23,220 |
) |
|
Purchase of Treasury Stock |
|
(225,917 |
) |
|
Shares of Beneficial Interest issued for Services Received |
|
49,280 |
|
|
Shares of Beneficial Interest issued to Satisfy Notes Payable to Related Parties |
|
690,820 |
|
|
Shares of Beneficial Interest issued to Purchase Management and Licensing Contracts |
|
155,000 |
|
|
Shares of Beneficial Interest issued to Satisfy Advances Payable to the Partnership |
|
3,661,659 |
|
|
Shares of Beneficial Interest issued to Purchase Yuma Hospitality Minority Interest |
|
2,766,515 |
|
|
Purchase of Yuma Hospitality Minority Interest Above Carrying Value |
|
1,177,425 |
|
|
Purchase of Partnership Units Above Carrying Value |
|
98,684 |
|
|
Reallocation of Minority Interest |
|
(752,455 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, JANUARY 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
6,264,634 |
|
See accompanying notes to
consolidated financial statements
26
INNSUITES
HOSPITALITY TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
CASH FLOW
|
|
YEARS ENDED JANUARY 31, |
|
|||||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|||
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Shares of Beneficial Interest |
|
$ |
240,442 |
|
$ |
(2,594,317 |
) |
$ |
(3,445,948 |
) |
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Shares of Beneficial Interest to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Cumulative Effect of Adoption of Accounting Principle |
|
854,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net Income from Variable Interest Entities |
|
352,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Issuance of Shares for Management and Licensing Contracts |
|
155,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Impairment of Hotel Property |
|
|
|
458,401 |
|
589,687 |
|
|||
Provision for Uncollectible Receivables |
|
377,465 |
|
198,448 |
|
375,209 |
|
|||
Minority Interest |
|
1,032,103 |
|
(1,050,400 |
) |
(1,430,380 |
) |
|||
Hotel Property Depreciation |
|
2,755,499 |
|
2,977,583 |
|
3,395,844 |
|
|||
(Gain) Loss on Disposal Sale of Hotel Property |
|
(4,999,797 |
) |
124,310 |
|
66,401 |
|
|||
Amortization of Deferred Loan Fees |
|
38,312 |
|
49,036 |
|
54,209 |
|
|||
Capital Contribution from Waived Management and Licensing Fee Expense |
|
|
|
530,721 |
|
534,599 |
|
|||
Changes in Assets and Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Decrease (Increase) in Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets |
|
141,781 |
|
126,318 |
|
(61,844 |
) |
|||
(Increase) in Accounts Receivable |
|
(439,814 |
) |
(507,907 |
) |
(5,999 |
) |
|||
Increase in Purchase Deposit from Related Party |
|
700,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
(Decrease) Increase in Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses |
|
(547,850 |
) |
(224,509 |
) |
1,058,596 |
|
|||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
660,425 |
|
87,684 |
|
1,130,374 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
CASH FLOW FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Sale of Hotel Properties |
|
9,377,138 |
|
12,150,503 |
|
|
|
|||
Improvements and Additions to Hotel Properties |
|
(1,308,008 |
) |
(1,863,893 |
) |
(1,684,244 |
) |
|||
Change in Restricted Cash |
|
(113,852 |
) |
(91,003 |
) |
129,193 |
|
|||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
7,955,278 |
|
10,195,607 |
|
(1,555,051 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Principal Payments on Mortgage Notes Payable |
|
(6,087,771 |
) |
(4,306,890 |
) |
(1,226,308 |
) |
|||
Refinancing of Mortgage Notes Payable |
|
|
|
|
|
2,136,844 |
|
|||
Payments on Notes Payable to Banks |
|
(720,000 |
) |
(3,087,250 |
) |
(677,750 |
) |
|||
Borrowings on Notes Payable to Banks |
|
500,000 |
|
440,000 |
|
|
|
|||
Repurchase of Partnership Units |
|
(453,223 |
) |
(337 |
) |
(2,788 |
) |
|||
Repurchase of Treasury Stock |
|
(113,517 |
) |
(29,095 |
) |
(73,066 |
) |
|||
Payment of Dividends |
|
(23,220 |
) |
(40,986 |
) |
(20,010 |
) |
|||
Distributions to Minority Interest Holders |
|
(85,683 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|||
Payments on Notes and Advances Payable to Related Parties |
|
(1,740,299 |
) |
(4,773,927 |
) |
(227,068 |
) |
|||
Borrowings on Notes and Advances Payable to Related Parties |
|
198,000 |
|
1,507,750 |
|
668,826 |
|
|||
Payments on Other Notes Payable |
|
(88,647 |
) |
(81,075 |
) |
(65,484 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
(8,614,360 |
) |
(10,371,810 |
) |
513,196 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
1,343 |
|
(88,519 |
) |
88,519 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR |
|
|
|
88,519 |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR |
|
$ |
1,343 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
88,519 |
|
See accompanying notes to
consolidated financial statements
27
INNSUITES
HOSPITALITY TRUST AND SUBSIDIARIES
AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2005, 2004 AND 2003
InnSuites Hospitality Trust (the Trust) owns, as of January 31, 2005, directly and through a partnership interest, six hotels with an aggregate of 947 suites in Arizona, southern California and New Mexico (the Hotels). The Hotels operate as InnSuites Hotels.
Prior to February 1, 2004, the Trust operated as a self-managed and self-administered umbrella partnership real estate investment trust (REIT), with operations through an operating partnership, RRF Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership (the Partnership). Effective February 1, 2004, the Trust terminated its election to be taxed as a REIT. The Trust is the sole general partner of the Partnership and owned 64.75% and 51.54% of the Partnership as of January 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The Trusts weighted average ownership for the years ended January 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003 was 57.00%, 51.12% and 49.80%, respectively. The Partnership owns five of the hotel properties and incurs the related expenses. The Trust owns and operates the Yuma, Arizona hotel property directly, which it acquired from the Partnership on January 31, 2005. See Note 21 -Execution of the Plan to Regain Compliance with the American Stock Exchange Continued Listing Standards. Prior to May 1, 2004, the Hotels were leased to InnSuites Hotels, Inc. (InnSuites Hotels), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Trust. Subsequent to May 1, 2004, the Trust and the Partnership operate the Hotels owned by each of them. Prior to June 8, 2004, InnSuites Hotels held the franchise agreement for each Hotel and contracted with Suite Hospitality Management, Inc. (the Management Company) for certain property management services and employment services. Until July 2, 2003, the Management Company was owned 9.8% by the James F. Wirth (Mr. Wirth), Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Trust. On June 8, 2004, the Trust purchased the InnSuites trademarks and tradenames and related licensing agreements and acquired the management agreements with the Management Company. See Note 20 Purchase of Management and Licensing Contracts.
After June 8, 2004, InnSuites Hotels provides hotel management services to the Hotels, as well as three hotels featuring 440 suites owned by affiliates of Mr. Wirth and one unrelated hotel property featuring 129 suites. Under the management agreements, InnSuites Hotels provides the personnel at the hotels, the expenses of which are reimbursed at cost, and manages the hotels daily operations. All such expenses and reimbursements between InnSuites Hotels and the Partnership have been eliminated in consolidation. InnSuites Hotels received 2% of room revenue from the Hotels owned by the Partnership and the Trust in exchange for management services during fiscal year 2005. Effective February 1, 2005, InnSuites Hotels receives 2.5% of total revenues from these Hotels. These agreements expire on January 31, 2008. InnSuites Hotels received 1% (or more depending on results) of room revenue from the Hotels owned by affiliates of Mr. Wirth in exchange for management services during fiscal year 2005. These agreements require that these hotels pay 2% of room revenue, unless these hotels fail to reach 80% of their budgeted profit, at which point the fees are reduced to 1% of room revenue. These agreements expire on February 1, 2007 and may be cancelled by either party with 90-days notice or 30-days notice in the event the property changes ownership. InnSuites Hotels received 5% of total revenue from the unrelated hotel in San Diego, California in exchange for management services during fiscal year 2005. This agreement expires on March 31, 2007, and may be cancelled by either party with 90-days notice or 30-days notice in the event the property changes ownership.
After June 8, 2004, InnSuites Hotels owns the InnSuites trademark and holds trademark agreements with the Hotels, as well as three hotels featuring 440 suites owned by affiliates of Mr. Wirth and two unrelated hotel properties featuring 305 suites. InnSuites Hotels received 1.0% (2.0% for the hotel which does not carry a third-party franchise) of room revenue from the Hotels owned by the Partnership and the Trust in exchange for use of the InnSuites trademark during fiscal year 2005. The revenue and expenses related to these contracts have been eliminated in consolidation. Effective February 1, 2005, the InnSuites Hotels receives 1.25% (2.5% for the hotel which does not carry a third-party franchise) of total revenues from these Hotels. These agreements expire on January 31, 2008. InnSuites Hotels received 1% (or more depending on results) of room revenue from the Hotels owned by affiliates of Mr. Wirth in exchange for use of the InnSuites trademark during fiscal year 2005. These agreements require that these hotels pay 2% of room revenue, unless these hotels fail to reach 80% of their budgeted profit, at which point the fees are reduced to 1% of room revenue. These agreements have no expiration date and may be cancelled by either party with 12-months notice or 90-days notice in the event the property changes ownership. InnSuites Hotels received 2% of total revenue from the unrelated hotel in San Diego, California in exchange for trademark licensing services during fiscal year 2005. This agreement expires on March 31, 2005, and may be cancelled by either party with 90-days notice . InnSuites Hotels received 0.5% of room revenue from the unrelated hotel in Buena Park, California in exchange for trademark licensing services during fiscal year 2005. This agreement has no expiration date and may be cancelled by either party with 30-days notice.
28
As a REIT, through January 31, 2004, the Trust was prohibited from operating its properties other than through an independent management company or a taxable REIT subsidiary. Prior to February 1, 2001, InnSuites Hotels operated and managed all of the Hotels, with the assistance of InnSuites Innternational Hotels, Inc. (InnSuites Innternational), an entity owned by Mr. Wirth. Pursuant to management contracts, InnSuites Hotels paid InnSuites Innternational an annual management fee of 2.5% of gross revenues for property management services. Following the acquisition of InnSuites Hotels by the Trust effective February 1, 2001, InnSuites Hotels operated and managed the Hotels with the assistance of the Management Company, an entity in which Mr. Wirth previously had a 9.8% ownership interest, pursuant to substantially the same terms as the InnSuites Innternational management agreements. There were no termination fees charged in connection with the cancellation of the old management agreements. In exchange for its assumption of the management agreements, the Management Company agreed to pay $911,320 to InnSuites Innternational in order for InnSuites Innternational to satisfy its liabilities. On June 8, 2004, the management agreements of the Management Company were purchased by the Trust and the Trust began managing the Hotels, certain hotels owned by Mr. Wirth and an unrelated hotel. See Note 20 Purchase of Management and Licensing Contracts.
PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The Partnership Agreement of the Partnership provides for the issuance of two classes of limited partnership units, Class A and Class B. Class A and Class B limited partnership units are identical in all respects, except that each Class A limited partnership unit shall be convertible into one newly-issued Share of Beneficial Interest of the Trust, at any time at the option of the particular limited partner. The Class B limited partnership units may only become convertible with the approval of the Board of Trustees, in its sole discretion. As of January 31, 2005, 1,189,386 Class A limited partnership units were issued and outstanding representing 9.0% of the total partnership units. Additionally, as of January 31, 2005, 3,467,938 Class B limited partnership units were outstanding to Mr. Wirth and his affiliates, in lieu of the issuance of Class A limited partnership units representing 26.2% of the total partnership units. If all of the Class A and B limited partnership units were converted, the limited partners in the Partnership would receive 4,657,324 Shares of Beneficial Interest of the Trust. As of January 31, 2005, the Trust owns 8,554,193 general partner units in the Partnership, representing 64.8% of the total partnership units.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
As sole general partner of the Partnership, the Trust exercises unilateral control over the Partnership, and the Trust owns all of the issued and outstanding classes of shares of InnSuites Hotels. Therefore, the financial statements of the Partnership and InnSuites Hotels are consolidated with the Trust, and all significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The Trusts operations are affected by numerous factors, including the economy, competition in the hotel industry and the effect of the economy on the travel and hospitality industries. The Trust cannot predict if any of the above items will have a significant impact in the future, nor can it predict what impact, if any, the occurrence of these or other events might have on the Trusts operations and cash flows. Significant estimates and assumptions made by management are used for, but not limited to, the estimated useful lives of long-lived assets and estimates of future cash flows used to test a long-lived asset for recoverability, the fair values of the long-lived assets and the realization of net operating losses.
HOTEL PROPERTIES
Hotel properties are stated at cost and are depreciated using the straight-line method over estimated lives ranging from 5 to 40 years for buildings and improvements and 3 to 15 years for furniture and equipment.
The Trust adopted SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, in accounting for its hotel properties effective the beginning of fiscal year 2003 and previously applied SFAS No. 121 in
29
accounting for its hotel properties in fiscal year 2002. Properties held for sale at the beginning of fiscal year 2003 continued to be accounted for under SFAS No. 121. The adoption of SFAS No. 144 had no significant effect on the financial statements.
Management applies SFAS No. 144 to determine when it is required to test an asset for recoverability of its carrying value. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the estimated undiscounted future cash flows over its estimated remaining life, the Trust recognizes an impairment expense to reduce the assets carrying value to its fair value. The estimated future cash flows are based upon, among other things, assumptions about expected future operating performance, and may differ from actual cash flows. Long-lived assets evaluated for impairment are analyzed on a property-specific basis independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets. If the sum of the projected undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest) is less than the carrying value of the assets, the assets will be written down to the estimated fair value in the period in which the determination is made. The Trust determines the estimated useful lives of its assets based on the expected future economic benefit of the asset and its ability to hold such assets. Fair value is determined by the most current third-party property appraisal, if available. Evaluation of future cash flows is based on historical experience and other factors, including certain economic conditions and committed future bookings. Management has determined that no additional impairment of long-lived assets currently exists beyond the amounts recognized.
During fiscal year 2005, events and circumstances indicated that one of the Trusts properties held in use should be evaluated for impairment. However, the Trust obtained an updated third-party appraisal of the property, which indicated that the value of the property exceeded its carrying value. However, it is possible that future changes in the economic climate or real estate markets may adversely impact the fair values of the hotel properties, resulting in the need for the Trust to recognize an impairment expense to adjust the carrying value of those properties to their fair values.
Gains and losses on sales of properties are recognized at the time of sale or deferred to the extent required by GAAP.
The Trust will classify a hotel property as held for sale in the period (generally not to exceed one year) in which (1) it has made the decision to actively seek a buyer of the property and/or (2) a binding agreement to purchase the property has been signed under which the buyer has committed a significant amount of refundable cash and no significant financing contingencies exist which could cause the transaction not to be completed in a timely manner. If these criteria are met, the Trust will record an impairment loss if the fair value less the costs to sell is lower than the carrying amount of the hotel and will cease recording depreciation.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
The Trust considers all highly liquid short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
Room, food and beverage, telecommunications, management and licensing fees, and other revenue are recognized as earned as services are provided and items are sold. Payroll reimbursements are recorded as personnel are provided and are not netted with the corresponding payroll expense.
RECEIVABLES
Accounts receivable are carried at original amounts less an estimate made for doubtful receivables based on a review of outstanding amounts on a quarterly basis. Management records an allowance for doubtful accounts for 50% of the balances over 90 days and 100% of the balances over 120 days. Accounts receivables are written off when deemed uncollectible. Recoveries, if any, of receivables previously written off are recorded when received. The Trust does not charge interest on accounts receivable balances.
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Trust applies the provisions of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and provides pro forma net income (loss) disclosures for employee stock option grants as if the fair-value-based method defined in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, had been applied. In accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, compensation expense is recorded over the vesting period only if the current estimated market price on the underlying stock on the date an option is granted exceeds the exercise price.
30
No compensation cost has been recognized for options granted to employees for the years ended January 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003. The following pro forma information presents pro forma net loss information as if compensation expense had been recognized for stock options as determined under the fair-value-based method prescribed by SFAS No. 123 using the Black-Scholes options pricing model:
|
|
Years ended January 31 |
|
|||||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|||
Net income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
As reported |
|
$ |
240,442 |
|
$ |
(2,594,317 |
) |
$ |
(3,445,948 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Pro forma stock compensation expense |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
(175 |
) |
$ |
(14,024 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Pro forma |
|
$ |
240,442 |
|
$ |
(2,594,492 |
) |
$ |
(3,459,972 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net income (loss) per share basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
As reported |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
$ |
(1.27 |
) |
$ |
(1.67 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Pro forma |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
$ |
(1.27 |
) |
$ |
(1.67 |
) |
No stock options were issued during the fiscal years ended January 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003.
INCOME TAXES
Prior to February 1, 2004, the Trust elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code (the Code). To qualify as a REIT, the Trust was required to meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that it currently distribute at least 90% of its adjusted taxable income to its shareholders. As a REIT, the Trust was not subject to federal corporate income tax on that portion of its net income that was distributed to shareholders.
Prior to February 1, 2004, the Trust accounted for deferred taxes utilizing a liability method whereby deferred tax assets were recognized for deductible temporary differences and deferred tax liabilities were recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences were the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets were reduced by a valuation allowance when it was determined to be more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets would not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities were adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.
Effective February 1, 2004, the Trust relinquished its REIT status. As of that date, any distributions to its shareholders are not deductible for purposes of computing the Trusts taxable income and the Trust will be subject to income tax, including any applicable alternative minimum tax, on its taxable income at regular corporate rates, without offset for distributions of such income to its shareholders.
DIVIDENDS AND DISTRIBUTIONS
The Trust expects to pay dividends. The Trusts ability to pay dividends is largely dependent upon its receipt of distributions from the Partnership.
MINORITY INTEREST
The Trust accounts for minority interest in accordance with EITF Issue No. 94-2 Treatment of Minority Interests in Certain Real Estate Investments and EITF Issue No. 95-7 Implementation Issues Related to the Treatment of Minority Interest in Certain Real Estate Investment Trusts.
31
Minority interest in the Partnership represents the limited partners proportionate share of the capital and earnings of the Partnership. Income or loss is allocated to the minority interest based on its weighted average ownership percentage in the Partnership throughout the period, and capital is allocated based on its ownership percentage at year-end. Any difference is recorded as a reallocation of minority interest as a component of shareholders equity.
INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
Basic and diluted income (loss) per Share of Beneficial Interest have been computed based on the weighted-average number of Shares of Beneficial Interest and potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the periods.
For the twelve months ended January 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, there were Class A and Class B limited partnership units outstanding, which are convertible into Shares of Beneficial Interest of the Trust. Assuming conversion at the beginning of each period, the aggregate weighted-average of these Shares of Beneficial Interest would have been 5,680,962, 6,457,165 and 6,673,808 in addition to the basic shares outstanding for fiscal year 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. These Shares of Beneficial Interest issuable upon conversion of the Class A and Class B limited partnership units are anti-dilutive due to the fact that the conversion of these units would result in increased earnings per share. Therefore, they have not been included in the number of issued and outstanding Shares of Beneficial Interest used in the calculation of diluted earnings per share.
For the twelve months ended January 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, 232,600, 246,000 and 253,200 stock options, respectively, are not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share as their inclusion would have an antidilutive effect because of the fact that the option exercise prices are greater than the average market price of the Trusts Shares of Beneficial Interest.
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
For disclosure purposes, fair value is determined by using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. Due to their short maturities, cash and cash equivalents are carried at cost, which reasonably approximates fair value.
The fair value of mortgage notes payable, notes payable to banks and notes and advances payable to related parties is estimated by using the current rates which would be available for similar loans having the same remaining maturities. The carrying value of accounts payable and accrued expenses and other notes payable approximates fair value, due to their short-term nature. See Note 14 Fair Value of Financial Instruments.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In December 2004, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004) was issued. This Statement is a revision of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation, and supercedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. This Statement establishes standards for accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity securities for goods and services. The Trust is required to adopt this Statement as of August 31, 2005. The Trust believes that the adoption of this Statement will not affect future financial results, as all options granted by the Trust are fully vested.
SEGMENT REPORTING
The Trust views its operations as one operating business segment, a hospitality company that owns six hotel properties with an aggregate of 947 suites in Arizona, southern California and New Mexico.
ADVERTISING COSTS
Amounts incurred for advertising costs with third parties are expensed as incurred. Advertising expense totaled approximately $1,642,000, $2,110,000 and $2,216,000 for the years ended January 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively.
As of January 31 of the respective years, hotel properties, and hotel properties held for sale, consisted of the following:
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Land |
|
$ |
2,824,520 |
|
$ |
3,182,368 |
|
Building and improvements |
|
32,958,443 |
|
34,274,136 |
|
||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
|
6,913,030 |
|
6,748,816 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total hotel properties |
|
42,695,993 |
|
44,205,320 |
|
||
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
11,505,854 |
|
10,120,000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Hotel properties, net |
|
$ |
31,190,139 |
|
$ |
34,085,320 |
|
Hotel properties, held for sale |
|
$ |
3,121,235 |
|
$ |
11,733,371 |
|
32
In December 2000, InnSuites Hotels and the Trust established independent review groups to consider altering the current structure of the management and operations of the Hotels pursuant to the provisions of the REIT Modernization Act. Effective February 1, 2001, the Trust acquired all of the issued and outstanding common and preferred equity stock of InnSuites Hotels for $11,531 in cash consideration and the assumption of approximately $1.6 million of net liabilities. Prior to the acquisition, InnSuites Hotels was owned 23% by Marc E. Berg, Executive Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer and Trustee of the Trust, 9.8% by InnSuites Innternational Hotels, Inc., a wholly-owned affiliate of Mr. Wirth and his spouse, and 67.2% by unrelated parties.
Following the acquisition, the management contracts relating to the Hotels between InnSuites Hotels and InnSuites Innternational Hotels, Inc. were terminated effective January 31, 2001 and new management contracts were entered into on substantially similar terms with the Management Company, 9.8% of which was owned by Mr. Wirth prior to July 1, 2003, when Mr. Wirth sold his interest to the majority stockholder. There were no termination fees charged in connection with the cancellation of the old management contracts. In exchange for its assumption of the management agreements, the Management Company agreed to pay $911,320 to InnSuites Innternational in order for InnSuites Innternational to satisfy its liabilities. The acquisition of InnSuites Hotels by the Trust resulted in the following benefits: (1) a more direct relationship between the Hotels and the Trust, (2) the inclusion of InnSuites Hotels revenues in excess of required rent payments in the Trusts consolidated financial reports, (3) the elimination of potential conflicts of interest and (4) the reduction of certain administrative costs relative to the operation of the Hotels.
At January 31, 2005, the Trust had mortgage notes payable outstanding with respect to each of the Hotels. The mortgage notes payable have various repayment terms and have scheduled maturity dates ranging from July 29, 2009 to May 1, 2016. Weighted average interest rates on the mortgage notes payable for the years ended January 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 were 8.03%, 7.72% and 8.33%, respectively.
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Mortgage note payable, due in variable monthly installments, including interest at prime rate plus 1.0% per year, through July 29, 2009, secured by the Tucson St. Marys property with a carrying value of $9.6 million at January 31, 2005. |
|
$ |
4,285,505 |
|
$ |
4,374,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Mortgage note payable, due in monthly installments of $48,738, including interest at 8% per year, through May 1, 2016, secured by the Tucson Oracle property with a carrying value of $5.3 million at January 31, 2005. |
|
4,349,266 |
|
4,576,229 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Mortgage note payable, due in monthly installments of $71,141, including interest at 8.28% per year, through May 11, 2011, secured by the Ontario property with a carrying value of $7.3 million at January 31, 2005. |
|
8,586,467 |
|
8,711,653 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Mortgage note payable, due in monthly installments of $15,858, including interest at 8.875% per year, through September 1, 2015, secured by the Albuquerque property with a carrying value of $1.9 million at January 31, 2005. |
|
1,309,249 |
|
1,379,904 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Mortgage note payable, due in monthly installments of $42,886, including interest at 8.25% per year, through April 1, 2014, secured by the Northern Phoenix property with a carrying value of $3.1 million at January 31, 2005. |
|
3,290,859 |
|
3,523,469 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Mortgage note payable, due in monthly installments of $41,168, including interest at 9.25% per year, through August 1, 2011, secured by the Yuma property with a carrying value of $6.7 million at January 31, 2005. |
|
2,186,099 |
|
2,685,306 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Mortgage note payable, paid in full in fiscal year 2005 in connection with the sale of the San Diego property. |
|
|
|
4,813,525 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Mortgage note payable, paid in full in fiscal year 2005 in connection with the sale of the Tempe property. |
|
|
|
1,741,087 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Totals |
|
$ |
24,007,445 |
|
$ |
31,805,715 |
|
33
Mr. Wirth and certain of his affiliates have guaranteed $3,738,479 and $5,845,475 of the mortgage notes payable as of January 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The net book value of the properties securing these mortgage notes payable at January 31, 2005 and 2004 was $19,441,000 and $45,747,000, respectively. See Note 9 Minimum Debt Payments for scheduled minimum payments.
On July 21, 2004, the Trust obtained a bank line of credit secured by a security agreement, business loan agreement and commercial guaranty of the Partnership all dated July 21, 2004. The line of credit is secured by the assets of the Trust alone, which is comprised mainly of its investment in the subsidiaries. Under the terms of the line of credit, the Trust can draw up to $500,000, bearing interest at prime plus 1.0% (6.25% as of January 31, 2005) per annum, and is required to make monthly interest-only payments. The line of credit matures on July 20, 2005. As of January 31, 2004, the Trust had drawn the entire $500,000 available under the line of credit.
Notes and advances payable to related parties consist of funds provided by Mr. Wirth, certain of his affiliates and other related parties to permit the Trust to repurchase additional general partnership units in the Partnership and to fund working capital and capital improvement needs. The aggregate amounts outstanding to related parties were approximately $94,000 and $6.9 million as of January 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The notes and advances payable to related parties are as follows as of January 31 of the respective years:
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Note payable to The Anderson Charitable Remainder Unitrust, an affiliate of Mason Anderson, Trustee of the Trust, bearing interest at 7% per annum, and secured by Shares of Beneficial Interest in the Trust. Due in monthly principal and interest payments of $2,408 through September 2005. |
|
$ |
18,771 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Note payable to Wayne Anderson, son of Mason Anderson, Trustee of the Trust, bearing interest at 7% per annum, and secured by Shares of Beneficial Interest in the Trust. Due in monthly principal and interest payments of $574 through June 2009. |
|
26,114 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Note payable to Karen Anderson, daughter of Mason Anderson, Trustee of the Trust, bearing interest at 7% per annum, and secured by Shares of Beneficial Interest in the Trust. Due in monthly principal and interest payments of $574 through June 2009. |
|
26,115 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Note payable to Kathy Anderson, daughter of Mason Anderson, Trustee of the Trust, bearing interest at 7% per annum, and secured by Shares of Beneficial Interest in the Trust. Due in monthly principal and interest payments of $495 through June 2009. |
|
22,512 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Note payable to Steve Robson, Trustee of the Trust, paid in full during fiscal year 2005 with Shares of Beneficial Interest in the Trust. |
|
|
|
239,667 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Unsecured notes payable to Rare Earth Financial, L.L.C., an affiliate of Mr. Wirth, paid in full during fiscal year 2005. |
|
|
|
514,500 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Unsecured note payable to Rare Earth Financial, L.L.C., an affiliate of Mr. Wirth, paid in full during fiscal year 2005 in connection with the sale of the Tempe property. |
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Note payable to Rare Earth Financial, L.L.C., an affiliate of Mr. Wirth, bearing interest at 7% per annum, paid in full during fiscal year 2005 in connection with the sale of the Tempe property. |
|
|
|
2,072,893 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Note payable to Rare Earth Financial, L.L.C., an affiliate of Mr. Wirth, paid in full during fiscal year 2005 in connection with the sale of the Tempe property |
|
|
|
1,379,646 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Note payable to Hulsey Hotels Corporation, an affiliate of Mr. Wirth, paid in full during fiscal year 2005. |
|
|
|
356,550 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Note payable to Mr. Wirth, bearing interest at 7% per annum, paid in full during fiscal year 2005 |
|
|
|
187,230 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Unsecured note payable to Mr. Wirth, paid in full during fiscal year 2005. |
|
|
|
101,755 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Totals |
|
$ |
93,512 |
|
$ |
6,852,241 |
|
34
During the second and third quarters of fiscal year 2004, the Trust issued five promissory notes in the amount of $208,000, $75,000, $200,000, $110,000 and $60,000 to Rare Earth Development Company, an affiliate of Mr. Wirth, all of which were paid in full in the third quarter of fiscal year 2004 utilizing a portion of the cash proceeds from the sale of the Buena Park property.
During the second quarter of fiscal year 2004, the Trust issued a promissory note in the amount of $225,000 to Rare Earth Financial, L.L.C., an affiliate of Mr. Wirth, which was paid in full in the third quarter of fiscal year 2004 utilizing a portion of the cash proceeds from the sale of the Buena Park property.
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2005, the Trust repurchased 433,036 Class B limited partnership units in the Partnership from affiliates of Mr. Wirth, issuing promissory notes in the aggregate amount of $974,331. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2005, the Trust repaid $449,500 of these notes. During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005, the Trust repaid the remaining balance of these notes with Shares of Beneficial Interest with an aggregate value of $467,552. Additionally, Mr. Wirth converted 100,000 Class B limited partnership units in the Partnership into 100,000 Shares of Beneficial Interest.
As of February 2, 2004, J. R. Chase, the sole stockholder of the Management Company, agreed to transfer 32,363 Shares of Beneficial Interest in the Trust to the Management Company in order to facilitate the Management Companys acquisition of Licensing Corp. from Mr. Wirth. In consideration of the transfer of those Shares, the Management Company agreed to pay Mr. Chase $72,817. The Management Company fully satisfied this obligation during June 2004. See Note 20, Purchase of Management and Licensing Contracts.
During the second quarter of fiscal year 2005, the Trust issued promissory notes totaling $83,000 to affiliates of Mason Anderson, who subsequently became a Trustee of the Trust, in exchange for 47,084 Shares of Beneficial Interest in the Trust.
During the second quarter of fiscal year 2005, the Trust issued 55,423 Shares of Beneficial Interest to satisfy unpaid principal and interest totaling $95,882 to Mr. Robson, a Trustee of the Trust.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005, the Partnership reclassified $700,000 of advances payable to Rare Earth Financial, L.L.C., an affiliate of Mr. Wirth, to a deposit for the purchase of the Phoenix, Arizona hotel property by another affiliate of Mr. Wirth.
The Trust paid interest on related party notes to Mr. Wirth and his affiliates in the amounts of $443,959, $205,101 and $28,373 for the twelve months ended January 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The Trust incurred interest expense on related party notes to Mr. Wirth and his affiliates in the amounts of $122,314, $515,214 and $623,522 for the twelve months ended January 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
As of January 31, 2005, the Trust had $248,413 in secured promissory notes outstanding to unrelated third parties arising from the repurchase of 188,261 Class A limited partnership units in the Partnership and the repurchase of 18,233 Shares of Beneficial Interest in privately negotiated transactions. The promissory notes bear interest at 7% per year and are due in varying monthly payments through March 2011. The repurchased Class A limited partnership units and Shares of Beneficial Interest secure the notes. As of January 31, 2004, the Trust had outstanding $169,277 in secured promissory notes to unrelated third parties arising from the repurchase of certain limited partnership units and Shares of Beneficial Interest.
35
Scheduled minimum payments of debt as of January 31, 2005 are as follows in the respective fiscal years indicated:
FISCAL YEAR ENDED |
|
AMOUNT |
|
|
2006 |
|
$ |
1,673,537 |
|
2007 |
|
1,232,615 |
|
|
2008 |
|
1,332,085 |
|
|
2009 |
|
1,397,031 |
|
|
2010 |
|
5,246,271 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
13,967,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
24,849,370 |
|
Holders of the Trusts Shares of Beneficial Interest are entitled to receive dividends when and if declared by the Board of Trustees of the Trust out of funds legally available therefor. The holders of Shares of Beneficial Interest, upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding-down of the Trust, are entitled to share ratably in any assets remaining after payment in full of all liabilities of the Trust. The Shares of Beneficial Interest possess ordinary voting rights, each share entitling the holder thereof to one vote. Holders of Shares of Beneficial Interest do not have cumulative voting rights in the election of Trustees and do not have preemptive rights.
On January 2, 2001, the Board of Trustees approved a share repurchase program under Rule 10b-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for the purchase of up to 250,000 limited partnership units in the Partnership and/or Shares of Beneficial Interest in open market or privately negotiated transactions. Additionally, on September 10, 2002, the Board of Trustees approved the purchase of up to 350,000 additional limited partnership units in the Partnership and/or Shares of Beneficial Interest in open market or privately negotiated transactions. Acquired Shares of Beneficial Interest are held in treasury and are available for future acquisitions and financings and/or for awards granted under the Trusts 1997 Stock Incentive and Option Plan. During fiscal year 2005, the Trust acquired 130,717 Shares of Beneficial Interest in open market and privately negotiated transactions at an average price of $1.73 per share and 532,077 limited partnership units in privately negotiated transactions at an average price of $2.17 per unit. The Trust intends to continue repurchasing Shares of Beneficial Interest in compliance with applicable legal and American Stock Exchange requirements. The Trust is authorized to repurchase an additional 40,133 limited partnership units and/or Shares of Beneficial Interest pursuant to the share repurchase program.
For the years ended January 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, the Trust repurchased 130,717, 22,500 and 191,343 Shares of Beneficial Interest at an average price of $1.73, $1.29 and $2.00 per share, respectively. Repurchased Shares of Beneficial Interest are accounted for as treasury stock in the Trusts Consolidated Statements of Shareholders (Deficit) Equity.
The Trust has an income tax net operating loss carryforward of approximately $15.2 million at January 31, 2005. The quarterly allocation of cash dividends paid per Share of Beneficial Interest and the characterization of dividends as either ordinary income or return of capital for an individual shareholders income tax purposes were as follows:
|
|
CALENDAR 2004 |
|
CALENDAR 2003 |
|
CALENDAR 2002 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Month
|
|
Ordinary
|
|
Return of
|
|
Total
|
|
Ordinary
|
|
Return of
|
|
Total
|
|
Ordinary
|
|
Return of
|
|
Total
|
|
||||||
January |
|
|
|
$ |
.02 |
|
$ |
.02 |
|
|
|
$ |
.01 |
|
$ |
.01 |
|
|
|
$ |
.01 |
|
$ |
.01 |
|
May |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
July |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
October |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
.02 |
|
$ |
.02 |
|
|
|
$ |
.01 |
|
$ |
.01 |
|
|
|
$ |
.01 |
|
$ |
.01 |
|
The tax status of distributions to shareholders in calendar 2005 will be dependent on the level of the Trusts earnings in that year. If certain changes in the Trusts ownership should occur, there could be an annual limitation on the amount of carryforwards that can be utilized, which could potentially impair the ability to utilize the full amount of the carryforwards.
36
The total dividends per Share of Beneficial Interest applicable to operating results for the years ended January 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, amounted to $0.01 per share, $0.02 per share and $0.01 per share, respectively.
The Trust has federal and state net operating loss carryforwards which are estimated to expire as follows:
Total and net deferred income tax assets at January 31, 2005 consist of:
Net operating loss carryforwards |
|
$ |
6,722,000 |
|
Book/Tax differences in operating assets |
|
94,000 |
|
|
Total deferred income tax assets |
|
6,816,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax liability associated with book/tax differences in hotel properties |
|
(3,425,000 |
) |
|
Net deferred income tax asset |
|
3,391,000 |
|
|
Valuation allowance |
|
(3,221,000 |
) |
|
Net deferred income tax asset |
|
$ |
170,000 |
|
Income taxes for the year ended January 31, 2005 are:
Current income tax provision |
|
$ |
330,000 |
|
Deferred income tax benefit |
|
(170,000 |
) |
|
Net income tax provision |
|
$ |
160,000 |
|
Mr. Wirth has an employment agreement with the Trust that expires in December 2007. The employment agreement provides that Mr. Wirth received no compensation from the Trust as long as a previously enforceable advisory agreement was in effect. However, pursuant to the terms of the employment agreement, since the Advisor (as defined in the advisory agreement) no longer provides services to the Partnership or the Trust, Mr. Wirth is to be compensated at an amount up to the same annual basis as the Advisor would have been compensated under the terms of the advisory agreement had it remained in effect. Mr. Wirth is currently being compensated, however, at a lesser rate of $130,000 a year.
The Partnership is responsible for all expenses incurred by the Trust in accordance with the Partnership Agreement.
The Initial Hotels were acquired by the Partnership from entities in which Mr. Wirth and his affiliates had substantial ownership interests. Mr. Wirth and his affiliates received 4,017,361 Class B limited partnership units and 647,231 Shares of Beneficial Interest in the Trust in exchange for their interests in the Initial Hotels. As of January 31, 2005 and 2004, Mr. Wirth and his affiliates held 3,467,938 and 5,000,974 Class B limited partnership units, respectively, which represented 26.3% and 37.9% of the total outstanding partnership units. As of January 31, 2005 and 2004, Mr. Wirth and his affiliates held 5,817,869 and 455,000 Shares of Beneficial Interest in the Trust, respectively, which represented 66.8% and 22.2% of the total issued and outstanding Shares of Beneficial Interest.
37
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2004, the Partnership forgave $3,134,130 of rent accrued but unpaid by InnSuites Hotels, which had a net effect of increasing the Trusts Shareholders Equity by $1,518,834.
At January 31, 2005 and 2004, the Trust owned a 64.75% interest and 51.54% interest, respectively, in the Hotels through its sole general partners interest in the Partnership.
The carrying amounts and fair values of the Trusts significant financial instruments at January 31, 2005 and 2004 are as follows:
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||||||||
|
|
CARRYING
|
|
FAIR
|
|
CARRYING
|
|
FAIR
|
|
||||
Mortgage notes payable |
|
$ |
24,007,445 |
|
$ |
25,675,971 |
|
$ |
31,805,715 |
|
$ |
33,747,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Notes payable to banks |
|
500,000 |
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Notes and advances payable to related parties |
|
93,512 |
|
94,713 |
|
6,852,241 |
|
6,644,000 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Other notes payable |
|
248,413 |
|
252,911 |
|
169,277 |
|
170,000 |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|||
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
2,514,975 |
|
$ |
3,030,616 |
|
$ |
3,069,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Promissory notes issued by the Trust to acquire Class A limited partnership units |
|
179,500 |
|
87,800 |
|
79,000 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Promissory notes issued by the Trust to acquire Shares of Beneficial Interest |
|
112,400 |
|
|
|
433,000 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Promissory notes issued by the Trust to acquire Class B limited partnership units |
|
971,831 |
|
|
|
438,000 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Shares issued to Trustees and Officers in exchange for services |
|
49,280 |
|
43,680 |
|
80,858 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Shares issued to affiliates to satisfy notes payable |
|
690,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Mortgage notes payable refinanced |
|
|
|
|
|
7,263,156 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Accrued interest forgiven by related party |
|
|
|
|
|
670,629 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Accrued interest reclassified to principal due on notes payable to related parties |
|
|
|
417,264 |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Promissory notes assigned to satisfy notes payable to related parties |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|||
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2005, the Trust reduced the principal balance of its note payable to Hulsey Hotels Corporation, an affiliate of Mr. Wirth, by $119,427 to offset receivables in the same amount that were owed to the Trust by other entities affiliated with Mr. Wirth.
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2005, J. R. Chase, the sole stockholder of the Management Company, agreed to transfer 32,363 Shares of Beneficial Interest in the Trust to the Management Company in order to facilitate the Management Companys acquisition of Licensing Corp. from Mr. Wirth. In consideration of the transfer of those Shares, the Management Company agreed to pay Mr. Chase $72,817. The Management Company fully satisfied this obligation during June 2004.
During the second quarter of fiscal year 2005, Rare Earth Financial, an affiliate of Mr.Wirth, assumed from the Management Company a note payable with a principal balance of $23,303.
The Trust issued 113,048, 40,000 and 16,610 Shares of Beneficial Interest during the years ended January 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, in exchange for Class A limited partnership units. The issued Shares of Beneficial Interest were valued at $205,747, $56,000 and $23,254, respectively.
Two of the Hotels are subject to non-cancelable ground leases expiring in 2050 and 2033. Total expense associated with the non-cancelable ground leases for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 was $190,378, $188,290 and $186,850, respectively, plus a variable component based on gross revenues of each property that totaled approximately $80,000, $74,000 and $82,000, respectively.
38
Future minimum lease payments under these non-cancelable ground leases are as follows:
Fiscal Year Ending |
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
$ |
196,186 |
|
2006 |
|
196,186 |
|
|
2007 |
|
196,186 |
|
|
2008 |
|
196,186 |
|
|
2009 |
|
196,186 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
6,147,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,128,793 |
|
The Trust is obligated under loan agreements relating to five of its hotels to deposit 4% of the individual hotels room revenue into an escrow account to be used for capital expenditures. The escrow funds applicable to the five hotel properties for which a mortgage lender escrow exists are reported on the Trusts Consolidated Balance Sheet as Restricted Cash.
InnSuites Hotels has entered into franchise arrangements with certain third parties for five of the hotel properties, with four Best Western hotels and one Holiday Inn hotel. These agreements provide for fees to be paid by the Hotels based on revenue and reservations received, and contain no minimum payment provisions.
The nature of the operations of the Hotels exposes them to risks of claims and litigation in the normal course of their business. Although the outcome of these matters cannot be determined, management does not expect that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity of the Trust.
The Trust is involved from time to time in various other claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Trusts consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
During fiscal year 1999, the shareholders of the Trust adopted the 1997 Stock Incentive and Option Plan (the Plan). Pursuant to the Plan, the Compensation Committee may grant options to the Trustees, officers, other key employees, consultants, advisors and similar employees of the Trust and certain of its subsidiaries and affiliates. The number of options that may be granted in a year is limited to 10% of the total Shares of Beneficial Interest and limited partnership units in the Partnership (Class A and Class B) outstanding as of the first day of such year.
Generally, granted options expire 10 years from the date of grant, are exercisable during the optionees lifetime only by the recipient and are non-transferable. Unexercised options held by employees of the Trust generally terminate on the date the individual ceases to be an employee of the Trust.
There were no options granted in fiscal year 2005, 2004 or 2003. All outstanding options vested in July 2003. The Plan currently has 506,800 options available to grant.
The Plan also permits the Trust to award stock appreciation rights, none of which, as of January 31, 2005, have been issued.
39
The following table summarizes the stock option activity during fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003, and provides information about the stock options outstanding at January 31, 2005:
|
|
Number of Options |
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Stock Option Activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, January 31, 2002 |
|
272,300 |
|
$ |
2.50 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
(19,100 |
) |
2.50 |
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, January 31, 2003 |
|
253,200 |
|
$ |
2.50 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
(7,200 |
) |
2.50 |
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, January 31, 2004 |
|
246,000 |
|
$ |
2.50 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
(13,400 |
) |
2.50 |
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, January 31, 2005 |
|
232,600 |
|
$ |
2.50 |
|
Stock Option Information |
|
January 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable |
|
232,600 |
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|
$ |
2.50 |
|
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life |
|
3.65 |
|
|
For stock options granted to non-employees of the Trust, compensation was recognized over the respective vesting period based upon the fair value of the options as calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model. During the year ended January 31, 2000, the Trust granted 28,200 stock options to non-employees. The Trust did not grant any stock options to non-employees during fiscal years 2005, 2004, 2003, 2002, or 2001. There was no equity-related compensation expense recorded during the years ended January 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003.
The following is a summary of the results of operations, by quarter, for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2005 and 2004. Management believes that all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of such interim results have been included. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of those for the entire fiscal year.
FISCAL 2005 |
|
APRIL 30 |
|
JULY 31 |
|
OCTOBER 31 |
|
JANUARY 31 |
|
FISCAL 2005 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total revenue |
|
$ |
7,358,640 |
|
$ |
4,922,554 |
|
$ |
5,062,591 |
|
$ |
5,531,402 |
|
$ |
22,875,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total revenue less interest expense on mortgage loans and operating expenses |
|
$ |
421,304 |
|
(1,230,942 |
) |
(780,262 |
) |
(721,455 |
) |
$ |
(2,311,355 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
2,028,243 |
|
(934,548 |
) |
(340,502 |
) |
(475,916 |
) |
$ |
240,442 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income (loss) per share basic |
|
$ |
.94 |
|
(.40 |
) |
(.14 |
) |
(0.17 |
) |
$ |
0.10 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income (loss) per share diluted |
|
$ |
.56 |
|
(.40 |
) |
(.14 |
) |
(0.17 |
) |
$ |
0.10 |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Dividends declared per share |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
.01 |
|
$ |
.01 |
|
|||
FISCAL 2004 |
|
APRIL 30 |
|
JULY 31 |
|
OCTOBER 31 |
|
JANUARY 31 |
|
FISCAL 2004 |
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total revenue |
|
$ |
7,626,138 |
|
$ |
5,763,954 |
|
$ |
5,412,679 |
|
$ |
5,408,557 |
|
$ |
24,211,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total revenue less interest expense on mortgage loans and operating expenses |
|
$ |
120,434 |
|
(1,466,219 |
) |
(837,767 |
) |
(853,803 |
) |
$ |
(3,037,355 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
147,099 |
|
(1,004,921 |
) |
(950,622 |
) |
(782,470 |
) |
$ |
(2,594,317 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income (loss) per share basic |
|
$ |
.07 |
|
(.50 |
) |
(.46 |
) |
(.38 |
) |
$ |
(1.27 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income (loss) per share diluted |
|
$ |
(.01 |
) |
(.50 |
) |
(.46 |
) |
(.38 |
) |
$ |
(1.27 |
) |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Dividends declared per share |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
.02 |
|
$ |
.02 |
|
|||
40
On March 25, 2004, the Trust sold its Tempe, Arizona hotel to Tempe/Phoenix Airport Resort LLC (Tempe Resort), an affiliate of Wirth, for its appraised value of $6.8 million, which was also its carrying value. The purchase price was satisfied by Tempe Resort assuming the Trusts mortgage note payable on the property of $1.7 million and assuming notes payable to Mr. Wirth and affiliates of $5.1 million.
On April 1, 2004, the Trust sold its San Diego, California hotel to an unrelated third party for $9.7 million, which the Trust received in cash. The Trust used $4.8 million of the proceeds to satisfy its mortgage note payable on the property, $1.4 million to satisfy notes and interest payable to related parties, and retained the remaining proceeds to reduce trade payables and to fund future operations and capital improvements. The net gain realized on both sales was $5,113,540, of which approximately $2,217,000 was applicable to the minority interest.
On January 4, 2005, the Board of Trustees approved the sale of the Phoenix, Arizona hotel to Phoenix Northern Resort LLC, an affiliate of Mr. Wirth, for its appraised value of $5.1 million. The propertys carrying value is $3.1 million. On January 15, 2005, Rare Earth Financial, another affiliate of Mr. Wirth, converted its $700,000 loan receivable into a non-interest bearing deposit for the purchase of the hotel. The Trust expects to complete the sale during the second quarter of fiscal year 2006. Any gain or loss recognized on the transaction will be recorded as a contribution or distribution because the purchaser is a related party. The Trust does not expect to incur a loss on the sale of the property.
In February 2004, the Trust adopted FIN 46R, which amended FIN 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements. FIN 46R requires an existing unconsolidated variable interest entity to be consolidated by its primary beneficiary if the entity does not effectively disperse risk among all parties involved or if other parties do not have significant capital to finance activities without subordinated financial support from the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary is the party that absorbs a majority of the entitys expected losses, receives a majority of its expected residual returns, or both, as a result of holding variable interests, which are the ownership, contractual or other pecuniary interests in an entity.
As of February 1, 2004, the Trust recorded a charge for the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle resulting from its recognition of the $854,000 net stockholders deficit of the Management Company, which was the Trusts variable interest entity under FIN 46R. The $854,000 charge represented the net effect of the Trust reporting $160,000 in net assets (consisting primarily of receivables) and $1,014,000 in net liabilities (consisting primarily of debt) upon consolidating the financial results of the Management Company.
The effect of consolidating the financial results of the Management Company and Licensing Corp. was accounted for as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. As a result of consolidating the financial results of the Management Company with its results, as of February 1, 2004, the Trusts financial results include a $854,402 charge for the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle on the Statements of Operations resulting in a reduction in its Stockholders Equity which represents the aggregate stockholders deficit reported by the Management Company as of February 1, 2004.
In connection with the Trusts relinquishment of its REIT status, the Trust no longer required the services of a separate management company. The Trust determined it was in its best interest to buy out the management contracts and licensing agreements and directly manage the Hotels through the Trusts wholly owned subsidiary, InnSuites Hotels. The Trust believes the management process of the Hotels will be simplified and that it will benefit from increased revenues by offering additional management and licensing services. As a result of this buy out, the Management Company (which was the Trusts variable interest entity under FIN 46R) was no longer consolidated in the second quarter. As of June 8, 2004, all of the Trusts obligations were satisfied, and the Management Company is in the process of being liquidated.
Effective June 8, 2004, InnSuites Hotels acquired the management agreements under which the Management Company provided management services to the Hotels. In consideration of the acquisition, the stockholder of the Management Company received $20,000 and 90,000 Shares of Beneficial Interest of the Trust, reflecting a transaction value of approximately $159,500 in the aggregate. Following the acquisition, InnSuites Hotels will self-manage the Hotels. The Trust also manages one unrelated hotel in San Diego, California and three hotels owned by Mr. Wirth.
Effective June 8, 2004, InnSuites Hotels acquired the license agreements under which Licensing Corp. provided licensing services to the Hotels, and the related registered and unregistered InnSuites trademarks and tradenames. In consideration of the acquisitions, the Management Company (as the sole stockholder of Licensing Corp.) received $60,000 and 10,000 Shares of Beneficial Interest of the Trust and InnSuites Hotels satisfied Licensing Corp.s line of credit in the amount of $459,000, reflecting a transaction value of approximately $534,500 in the aggregate. Following the acquisition, InnSuites Hotels will self-manage the Hotels. The Trust also provides licensing services to two unrelated hotels in San Diego and Buena Park, California and three hotels owned by Mr. Wirth. The Trust paid $459,000 in cash to satisfy the Management Companys line of credit. The additional $80,000 was paid to the Management Company to satisfy the Trusts obligation for the net liabilities of approximately the same amount. The Shares of Beneficial Interest issued by the Trust for both the management contracts and licensing agreements were valued at $155,000, which amount was recorded as an expense.
21. EXECUTION OF THE PLAN TO REGAIN COMPLIANCE WITH THE AMERICAN STOCK EXCHANGE CONTINUED LISTING STANDARDS
On December 10, 2004, the shareholders of the Trust approved several proposals relating to the Trusts plan to return to compliance with the American Stock Exchange (AMEX) continued listing standards. On January 4, 2005, the Board of Trustees approved the implementation of the proposals. The proposals were consummated on January 31, 2005, and resulted in:
41
A) The Trust issuing 6,577,732 Shares of Beneficial Interest in the Trust to the Partnership to satisfy advances and interest payable to the Partnership totaling approximately $8.6 million. The Partnership concurrently distributed the shares to its unit holders. Of the 6,577,732 Shares of Beneficial Interest distributed by the Partnership, 3,761,071 were returned to the Trust and became treasury stock. The remaining 2,816,661 Shares of Beneficial Interest remain outstanding.
B) The Trust issuing 4,969,712 Shares of Beneficial Interest in the Trust, with a fair value of approximately $6.5 million, to the Partnership to acquire its ownership interest in Yuma Hospitality Properties, Ltd., which owns and operates the Yuma, Arizona hotel property. The Partnership concurrently distributed the shares to its unit holders. Of the 4,969,712 Shares of Beneficial Interest distributed by the Partnership, 2,841,624 were returned to the Trust and became treasury stock. The remaining 2,128,088 Shares of Beneficial Interest remain outstanding. The fair value was determined using the carrying values of assets and liabilities, except for fixed assets, which were valued using appraised value. The portion of the excess of fair value over book value that relates to the minority interest partnership totals $1.2 million, and has been recorded as an increase in the basis of those fixed assets.
C) The Trust issuing 457,645 Shares of Beneficial Interest in the Trust to satisfy $594,938 of notes and interest payable to affiliates of Mr. Wirth. The entire balance of shares issued remains outstanding.
D) The Trust issuing 1,000,000 Shares of Beneficial Interest in the Trust to Mr. Wirth and his affiliates in exchange for 1,000,000 Class B limited partnership units in the Partnership, which increased the Trusts ownership interest in the Partnership 7.6%. The entire balance of shares issued remains outstanding.
In total, the Trust issued 13,005,089 Shares of Beneficial Interest in the Trust, of which 6,602,695 returned to the Trust as treasury stock and 6,402,394 remain outstanding. The transactions were valued at the closing price of a Trust Share of Beneficial Interest on January 24, 2005, which was $1.30. The Trust did not record a gain or loss, and did not increase the basis of consolidated assets as a result of the transactions, except for the acquisition of the minority interest ownership in Yuma Hospitality Properties. Mr. Wirth and his affiliates, through these transactions, received 5,182,186 Shares of Beneficial Interest in the Trust.
As of January 31, 2005, the Trust has total shareholders equity of $6.3 million, which exceeds the minimum amount of $6.0 million required to regain compliance with AMEX continued listing standards.
42
INNSUITES HOSPITALITY TRUST AND SUBSIDIARY
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
AS OF JANUARY 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
Initial
|
|
Cost
|
|
Gross
Amounts at
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
Encumbrances |
|
Land |
|
Building
and
|
|
Land |
|
Building
and
|
|
Land |
|
Building
and
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
InnSuites Hotel and Suites |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Phoenix Best Western |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Phoenix, Arizona |
|
$ |
3,290,859 |
|
$ |
418,219 |
|
$ |
2,922,884 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
71,430 |
|
$ |
418,219 |
|
$ |
2,994,314 |
|
InnSuites Hotel and Suites |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Tucson, Catalina Foothills Best Western |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Tucson, Arizona |
|
4,349,266 |
|
|
|
4,220,820 |
|
|
|
2,126,397 |
|
|
|
6,347,217 |
|
|||||||
InnSuites Hotels and Suites |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Yuma |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Yuma, Arizona |
|
2,186,099 |
|
251,649 |
|
4,983,292 |
|
53,366 |
|
2,335,094 |
|
305,015 |
|
7,318,386 |
|
|||||||
Holiday Inn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Airport Ontario Hotel and Suites |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Ontario, California |
|
8,586,467 |
|
1,633,064 |
|
5,450,872 |
|
|
|
1,599,785 |
|
1,633,064 |
|
7,050,657 |
|
|||||||
InnSuites Hotels and Suites |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Tucson St. Marys |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Tucson, Arizona |
|
4,285,505 |
|
900,000 |
|
9,166,549 |
|
(20,564 |
) |
803,009 |
|
879,436 |
|
9,969,558 |
|
|||||||
InnSuites Hotels and Suites |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Albuquerque Airport Best Western |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Albuquerque, New Mexico |
|
1,309,249 |
|
|
|
1,903,970 |
|
|
|
292,993 |
|
|
|
2,196,963 |
|
|||||||
InnSuites Hospitality Trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Phoenix, Arizona |
|
|
|
7,005 |
|
75,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
7,005 |
|
75,662 |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
$ |
24,007,445 |
|
$ |
3,209,937 |
|
$ |
28,724,049 |
|
$ |
32,802 |
|
$ |
7,228,708 |
|
$ |
3,242,739 |
|
$ |
35,952,757 |
|
43
|
|
Gross Land
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
Net
|
|
Date of
|
|
Date of
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
InnSuites Hotel and Suites |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Phoenix Best Western |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Phoenix, Arizona |
|
$ |
3,412,533 |
|
$ |
638,074 |
|
$ |
2,774,459 |
|
1980 |
|
1998 |
|
5-40 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
InnSuites Hotel and Suites |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Tucson, Catalina Foothills Best Western |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Tucson, Arizona |
|
6,347,217 |
|
1,226,620 |
|
5,120,597 |
|
1981 |
|
1998 |
|
5-40 years |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
InnSuites Hotels and Suites |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Yuma |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Yuma, Arizona |
|
7,623,401 |
|
1,281,642 |
|
6,341,759 |
|
1982 |
|
1998 |
|
5-40 years |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Holiday Inn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Airport Ontario Hotel and Suites |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Ontario, California |
|
8,683,721 |
|
1,742,115 |
|
6,941,606 |
|
1990 |
|
1998 |
|
5-40 years |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
InnSuites Hotels and Suites |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Tucson St. Marys |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Tucson, Arizona |
|
10,848,994 |
|
1,801,351 |
|
9,047,643 |
|
1960 |
|
1998 |
|
5-40 years |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
InnSuites Hotels and Suites |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Albuquerque Airport Best Western |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Albuquerque, New Mexico |
|
2,196,963 |
|
486,386 |
|
1,710,577 |
|
1975 |
|
2000 |
|
5-40 years |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
InnSuites Hospitality Trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Phoenix, Arizona |
|
82,667 |
|
|
|
82,667 |
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
$ |
39,195,496 |
|
$ |
7,176,188 |
|
$ |
32,019,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See accompanying independent auditors report.)
44
(A) Aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes at January 31, 2005 and 2004 are as follows:
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
2,275,007 |
|
3,542,733 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
21,750,426 |
|
25,999,097 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
24,025,433 |
|
29,541,830 |
|
Reconciliation of Real Estate:
Balance at January 31, 2003 |
|
$ |
61,750,782 |
|
Impairment of Hotel Property |
|
(2,827,457 |
) |
|
Sale of Hotel Properties |
|
(10,986,348 |
) |
|
Improvement to Hotel Properties |
|
888,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 31, 2004 |
|
$ |
48,825,009 |
|
Sale of Hotel Properties |
|
(11,368,505 |
) |
|
Write-up of Assets |
|
1,192,230 |
|
|
Improvement to Hotel Properties |
|
546,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
39,195,496 |
|
45
MORTGAGES LOANS ON REAL ESTATE
Description |
|
Interest Rate |
|
Maturity Date |
|
Periodic Payment Term |
|
Face Amount of Mortgages |
|
1/31/05 Carrying Amount |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Mortgage Note Secured by Albuquerque, NM property |
|
8.875 |
% |
9/1/2015 |
|
180 monthly installments |
|
$ |
1,575,000 |
|
$ |
1,309,248 |
|
Mortgage Note Secured by Phoenix, AZ property |
|
8.250 |
% |
4/1/2014 |
|
180 monthly installments |
|
$ |
4,850,000 |
|
$ |
3,290,859 |
|
Mortgage Note Secured by Ontario, CA property |
|
8.280 |
% |
5/11/2011 |
|
120 monthly installments, with balloon payment of $7,498,458 due at maturity |
|
$ |
9,000,000 |
|
$ |
8,586,468 |
|
Mortgage Note Secured by Yuma, AZ property |
|
9.250 |
% |
8/1/2011 |
|
180 monthly installments |
|
$ |
4,000,000 |
|
$ |
2,186,099 |
|
Mortgage Note Secured by Tucson St. Marys, AZ property |
|
Prime rate plus 1% (6.5% as of 1/31/05) |
|
7/29/2009 |
|
83 monthly installments, with balloon payment of $3,819,007 due at maturity |
|
$ |
4,500,000 |
|
$ |
4,285,505 |
|
Mortgage Note Secured by Tucson Oracle, AZ property |
|
8.000 |
% |
5/1/2016 |
|
180 monthly installments |
|
$ |
5,100,000 |
|
$ |
4,349,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
29,025,000 |
|
$ |
24,007,445 |
|
Mortgage Note Reconciliation
Balance at January 31, 2003 |
|
$ |
36,112,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deductions during period: |
|
|
|
||
|
Principal payments |
|
(4,306,890 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Balance at January 31, 2004 |
|
31,805,715 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
Deductions during period: |
|
|
|
||
|
Assumed by buyer of Tempe, AZ hotel |
|
(1,710,499 |
) |
|
|
Principal payments |
|
(6,087,771 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Balance at January 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
24,007,445 |
|
46
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE .
On January 20, 2005, the Trust received written notice, dated January 17, 2005, from McGladrey & Pullen, LLP (McGladrey) that McGladrey had resigned as the Trusts principal independent accountant to audit the Trusts financial statements. Anthony Waters, the Trusts Chief Financial Officer, spoke with representatives of McGladrey on January 17, 2005 regarding the Trusts relationship with McGladrey, however, Mr. Waters did not believe that McGladrey had resigned on that date.
The reports of McGladrey on the Trusts financial statements for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2004 and 2003 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. In connection with the audits of the Trusts financial statements for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2004 and 2003, and in the subsequent interim periods through January 20, 2005, there were no disagreements with McGladrey on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope and procedure which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of McGladrey, would have caused McGladrey to make reference to the matter in its report.
In connection with the audits of the Trusts financial statements for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2004 and 2003, and in the subsequent interim periods through January 20, 2005, there were no reportable events as that term is described in Item 304(a)(l)(v) of Regulation S-K, except that, on January 7, 2005, McGladrey provided a letter to the Audit Committee and management of the Trust noting two reportable conditions under standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants that McGladrey believed to be material weaknesses. McGladrey has advised the Trust that it believes that these two reportable conditions constitute reportable events.
The first reportable condition involves the lack of sufficient segregation of duties and responsibilities with respect to the recording and approval of financial information that occurred due to the departure of the Trusts Controller. Effective January 31, 2005, the Trust rehired its former Controller who will oversee the recording of financial information while the Trusts Chief Financial Officer will continue in his prior role of approving financial information. The second reportable condition involves the need for numerous adjusting journal entries and significant financial statement presentation changes, which resulted in McGladrey concluding that the Trusts monthly internal financial statements may not be reliable. The Trust has hired additional accounting staff and is considering additional measures that will better ensure the reliability of the Trusts internal financial statements.
On December 10, 2004, the Audit Committee discussed the conditions described above with McGladrey, but did not receive the letter identifying those conditions as reportable conditions and material weaknesses until January 7, 2005. Management of the Trust subsequently discussed the letter received on January 7, 2005 with McGladrey. The Trust has authorized McGladrey to respond fully to the inquiries of any successor accountant concerning the subject matter of the reportable conditions described above.
On April 4, 2005, the Trust engaged Epstein, Weber & Conover, P.L.C. (EWC) to act as the Trusts principal independent accountant to audit the Trusts financial statements. The decision to engage the new accountants was recommended and approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Trustees of the Trust.
During the fiscal years ended January 31, 2005 and 2004, and during all subsequent interim periods through April 4, 2005, the Trust did not consult with EWC regarding the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Trusts financial statements or any of the matters described in the preceding paragraphs of this Item 9.
47
Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Trust conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the Trusts disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on this evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded, except as described below, that the Trusts disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Trust in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commissions rules and forms. Except as described below, there was no change in the Trusts internal control over financial reporting during the Trusts most recently completed fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Trusts internal control over financial reporting.
The Trust did not timely file this Annual Report on Form 10K due to the resignation of McGladrey as the Trust's principal independent accountants on January 20, 2005 and the subsequent engagement of EWC on April 4, 2005, less than a month prior to the due date of this Form 10-K, and the need to resolve certain accounting issues and prepare and file its amended Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004, which filing was made on May 4, 2005. The Trust believes that these events are non-recurring and believes that it has sufficient staff and resources to timely file its reports with the Commission in the future.
On January 7, 2005, McGladrey, the Trusts former independent accountants, provided a letter to the Audit Committee and management of the Trust noting two reportable conditions under standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants that McGladrey believed to be material weaknesses.
The first reportable condition involved the lack of sufficient segregation of duties and responsibilities with respect to the recording and approval of financial information that occurred due to the departure of the Trusts Controller. Effective January 31, 2005, the Trust rehired its former Controller who will oversee the recording of financial information while the Trusts Chief Financial Officer will continue in his prior role of approving financial information. The second reportable condition involved the need for numerous adjusting journal entries and significant financial statement presentation changes, which resulted in McGladrey concluding that the Trusts monthly internal financial statements may not be reliable. The Trust has hired additional accounting staff and is considering additional measures that will better ensure the reliability of the Trusts internal financial statements.
On May 4, 2005, the Trust filed its Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004 in order to properly apply SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" and reclassify as continuing operations the results for the Hotels previously reported in discontinued operations for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 due to significant continuing involvement by the Trust in the operations of those Hotels and since the Trust continues to receive cash flows from those Hotels. In connection with that restatement, the Trust re-evaluated its disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting with respect to the proper application of financial accounting standards.
PART III
ITEM 10. TRUSTEES AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE TRUST
Nominees, Trustees and Executive Officers
The information concerning the Trustees and executive officers of the Trust set forth in the following table is based in part on information received from the respective Trustees and executive officers and in part on the Trusts records. The following table sets forth the name, age, term of office and principal business experience for each Trustee, nominee for Trustee and executive officer of the Trust, as applicable.
48
Name |
|
Principal
Occupations
|
|
Trustee
|
Nominees For Terms
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mason E. Anderson(1),(2),(3),(4) |
|
Self-employed as a private investor, including as an investor in real estate in the southwestern United States. Age 75. |
|
January 4, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
Steven S. Robson(2),(3),(4) |
|
President of Robson Communities, Inc. and Scott Homes and Scott Multifamily, Inc., residential real estate developers, since 1979. Age: 49. |
|
June 16, 1998 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trustee Whose Term
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marc E. Berg(1) |
|
Executive Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer of the Trust since February 10, 1999. Vice President Acquisitions of the Trust from December 16, 1998 to February 10, 1999. Consultant to InnSuites Hotels since 1989. Self-employed as a Registered Investment Advisor since 1985. Age: 52. |
|
January 30, 1998 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trustees Whose Terms
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James F. Wirth(1) |
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Trust since January 30, 1998. President and owner of Suite Hotels LLC and affiliated entities, owners and operators of hotels, since 1980. President of Rare Earth Development Company, a real estate investment company owned by Mr. Wirth, since 1973. Age: 59. |
|
January 30, 1998 |
|
|
|
|
|
Peter A. Thoma(2),(3),(4) |
|
Owner and operator of A&T Verleih, Hamburg, Germany, a hospitality service and rental company, since 1997. Owner and operator of Thoma Zeltsysteme, Hamburg, Germany, an import and sales company, since 1997. Age: 38. |
|
April 13, 1999 |
(1) Member of the Executive Committee.
(2) Member of the Audit Committee.
(3) Member of the Compensation Committee.
(4) Member of the Governance and Nominating Committee.
Other Executive Officers
Anthony B. Waters |
|
Chief Financial Officer of the Trust since February 29, 2000. Controller of the Trust from June 17, 1999 to February 29, 2000. Accountant and auditor with Michael Maastricht, CPA from June 16, 1998 to June 15, 1999, performing audits for InnSuites Hotels, Inc. Self-employed, concentrating in computerized accounting and information systems, from 1990 to June 1998. Age: 58. |
The Board of Trustees of the Trust has determined that Mr. Robson, a member of the Trusts Audit Committee, qualifies as a financial expert under applicable Commission rules, and that Messrs. Thoma, Robson and Anderson are independent, as such term is defined by Commission rules and Amex listing standards.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Based on Trust records and information, and upon representations from the reporting persons, the Trust believes that all Commission filing requirements applicable to Trustees, executive officers and beneficial owners of more than 10% of a registered class of equity securities of the Trust under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2005, were complied with .
Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers
The Trust has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and principal accounting officer and persons performing similar functions. The Trust has posted its Code of Ethics on its website at www.innsuitestrust.com. The Trust intends to satisfy all Commission and Amex disclosure requirements regarding any amendment to, or waiver of, the Code of Ethics relating to its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and principal accounting officer, and persons performing similar functions, by posting such information on its website and making any necessary filings with the Commission. In addition, the Trust has adopted a Code of Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of its employees, officers and Trustees. It is also available on the Trusts website at www.innsuitestrust.com.
49
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
During fiscal year 2005, the Trust issued 9,600 Shares to each Trustee, other than Messrs. Wirth and Berg, as compensation for services rendered as a Trustee of the Trust during fiscal year 2004. During fiscal year 2006, the Trust issued 9,600 Shares to Trustees Robson and Thoma, 3,200 Shares to Trustee Anderson and 5,600 Shares to former Trustee McConnell, as compensation for services rendered during fiscal year 2005; no Shares were issued to Messrs. Wirth and Berg. During fiscal year 2007, the Trust intends to issue 9,600 Shares to each Trustee, other than Messrs. Wirth and Berg, as compensation for services rendered during fiscal year 2006.
Summary Compensation Table
The table below shows individual compensation information for the Trusts Chief Executive Officer and any other executive officer whose total annual salary and bonus for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2005 exceeded $100,000.
Name and Principal Position |
|
Fiscal Year |
|
Annual Salary |
|
Restricted
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
James F. Wirth |
|
2005 |
|
$ |
130,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
President and Chief |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
95,231 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Officer (1) |
|
2003 |
|
$ |
95,936 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Anthony B. Waters |
|
2005 |
|
$ |
126,400 |
|
|
$ |
3,200 |
(4) |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
126,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,240 |
(5) |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
$ |
129,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The terms of Mr. Wirths Employment Agreement are summarized below. See Item 13 - Certain Relationships and Related Transactions - Employment Agreement with Mr. Wirth. |
(2) |
|
Although Mr. Wirths annual salary for fiscal year 2004 was set at $130,000, Mr. Wirth agreed to a salary reduction that resulted in an annual salary of $95,231 for fiscal year 2004. |
(3) |
|
Although Mr. Wirths annual salary for fiscal year 2003 was set at $126,000, Mr. Wirth agreed to a salary reduction that resulted in an annual salary of $95,936 for fiscal year 2003. |
(4) |
|
Represents the fair market value on the date of grant of 2,000 Shares issued to Mr. Waters as a bonus on March 26, 2004. |
(5) |
|
Represents the fair market value on the date of grant of 4,800 Shares issued to Mr. Waters as a bonus on June 30, 2003. |
Aggregated Option Exercises In Fiscal Year 2005 and Fiscal Year-End Option Values
Name |
|
Shares
|
|
Value
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
Value of Unexercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James F. Wirth |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
50,000/0 |
|
N/A |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anthony B. Waters |
|
N/A |
|
N/A |
|
20,000/0 |
|
N/A |
* |
*As of April 22, 2005, none of the options held by such individuals were in-the-money.
50
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table provides information about the Trusts equity compensation plans (other than qualified employee benefits plans and plans available to shareholders on a pro rata basis) as of January 31, 2005:
Equity Compensation Plan Information
Plan Category |
|
Number of Securities to
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
|
232,600 |
|
$ |
2.50 |
|
506,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
|
None |
|
None |
|
None |
|
|
The following table sets forth information as of April 22, 2005 in respect of any persons known to the Trust to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Shares (of which there were none, other than Mr. Wirth) and the number of Shares owned beneficially by each Trustee, nominee and executive officer, and the Trustees, nominees and executive officers as a group.
Five Percent Beneficial Owners and
Beneficial Ownership of Trustees, Nominees and Executive Officers
Name |
|
Shares
|
|
Percentage of Outstanding Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trustees, Nominees and Executive Officers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James F. Wirth (1) |
|
5,867,869 |
|
65.52 |
% |
Marc E. Berg (2) |
|
86,225 |
|
|
* |
Mason E. Anderson (3) |
|
221,806 |
|
2.49 |
% |
Steven S. Robson (4) |
|
213,523 |
|
2.39 |
% |
Peter A. Thoma (5) |
|
58,700 |
|
|
* |
Anthony B. Waters (6) |
|
31,400 |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trustees, Nominees and Executive Officers
as a group (six
|
|
6,479,523 |
|
71.63 |
% |
( 1 ) Consists of 50,000 Shares that may be acquired within 60 days of June 21, 2005 pursuant to the exercise of stock options and 5,817,869 Shares. These Shares are owned jointly by Mr. Wirth and his spouse. Mr. Wirth and his spouse also own all 3,467,938 issued and outstanding Class B limited partnership units in the Partnership, the conversion of which is restricted and permitted only at the discretion of the Board of Trustees of the Trust. Mr. Wirths address is 1615 E. Northern Avenue, Suite 102, Phoenix, Arizona 85020.
( 2 ) Consists of 30,000 Shares that may be acquired within 60 days of June 21, 2005 pursuant to the exercise of stock options and 56,225 Shares.
( 3 ) Consists of 170,000 Shares held by the Anderson Trust dated August 27, 1980 and 48,606 Shares held by the Anderson Charitable Remainder UniTrust. Mr. Anderson and his spouse are co-trustees and income beneficiaries of both Trusts. Mr. Anderson also holds 3,200 Shares directly. Mr. Andersons address is 3024 West Sahuaro Drive, Phoenix, Arizona 85029.
51
( 4 ) Consists of 20,000 Shares that may be acquired within 60 days of June 21, 2005 pursuant to the exercise of stock options and 193,523 Shares.
( 5 ) Consists of 20,000 Shares that may be acquired within 60 days of June 21, 2005 pursuant to the exercise of stock options and 38,700 Shares.
( 6 ) Consists of 20,000 Shares that may be acquired within 60 days of June 21, 2005 pursuant to the exercise of stock options and 11,400 Shares.
* Less than one percent (1.0%).
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Employment Agreement with Mr. Wirth
James F. Wirth, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Trust, has an Employment Agreement with the Trust expiring in December 2007. Pursuant to the terms of the Employment Agreement, upon the termination of the Advisory Agreement with Mid-America ReaFund Advisors, Inc. (MARA), a company owned by Mr. Wirth and his spouse, which termination occurred effective January 1, 1999, Mr. Wirth is to receive, each year through 2007, up to the amount MARA would have received for advisory and management services under the Advisory Agreement, but in no event will his compensation exceed $160,000 per year. Based upon a review of the performance of the Trust and upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, during fiscal year 2005, Mr. Wirth was paid an annual salary equal to $130,000, which is less than he is entitled to receive under the terms of his Employment Agreement. Mr. Wirths annual salary for fiscal year 2006 has been set at $130,000. The Compensation Committee does not rely on any particular set of financial or non-financial factors, measures or criteria when determining the compensation offered to Mr. Wirth.
Purchase of Class B Limited Partnership Units from Mr. Wirth
On February 2, 2004, the Trust purchased 433,036 Class B limited partnership units in the Partnership from Mr. Wirth and his affiliates for the closing price of the Trusts Shares of Beneficial Interest on that day, which was $2.25 per Share. The Trust made a down-payment totaling $2,500 and issued five promissory notes totaling $971,831, which will be paid in monthly installments of principal and interest over 84 months. The Trust repurchased these Class B limited partnership units to increase its sole general partner interest in the Partnership, and thereby receive a larger allocation of the Partnerships equity.
Acquisition of InnSuites Licensing Corp. by Suite Hospitality Management, Inc.
Effective February 2, 2004, the Management Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Licensing Corp., an entity then owned by Mr. Wirth and his spouse. In exchange for the stock of the Licensing Corp., Mr. Wirth and his spouse received 55,563 Shares of Beneficial Interest that were held by the Management Company. The Licensing Corp. became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Management Company. Agreements for the provision of trademark and license services by Licensing Corp. to InnSuites Hotels continued after this transfer, as described below in Item 13 - Certain Relationships and Related Transactions - Management of Hotel Properties and Licensing Agreements.
Effective on June 8, 2004, the Trust acquired the management agreements of the Management Company and the license agreements and related registered and unregistered InnSuites trademarks and tradenames of the Licensing Corp. See Item 1 Business Management and Licensing Contracts.
Management of Hotel Properties and Licensing Agreements
Mr. Wirth has derived benefits from the license agreements with the Licensing Corp., an entity formerly owned by Mr. Wirth and his spouse during fiscal year 2005. See Item 13 - Certain Relationships and Related Transactions - Acquisition of InnSuites Licensing Corp. by Suite Hospitality Management, Inc. above.
See Item 1 Business Management and Licensing Contracts, for a discussion of the former and current terms of the management and licensing agreements and a discussion of Mr. Wirths interest in those agreements.
52
Sale of Tempe, Arizona Property
Related Party Loans and Advances to the Trust
Notes and advances payable to related parties consist of funds provided by Mr. Wirth, certain of his affiliates and other related parties to permit the Trust to repurchase additional general partnership units in the Partnership and to fund working capital and capital improvement needs. The aggregate amounts outstanding to related parties were approximately $94,000 and $6.9 million as of January 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
The notes and advances payable to related parties are as follows as of January 31 of the respective years:
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
Note payable to the Anderson Charitable Remainder Unitrust, an affiliate of Mason Anderson, Trustee of the Trust, bearing interest at 7% per annum, and secured by Shares of Beneficial Interest in the Trust. Due in monthly principal and interest payments of $2,408 through September 2005. |
|
$ |
18,771 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Note payable to Wayne Anderson, son of Mason Anderson, Trustee of the Trust, bearing interest at 7% per annum, and secured by Shares of Beneficial Interest in the Trust. Due in monthly principal and interest payments of $574 through June 2009. |
|
26,114 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Note payable to Karen Anderson, daughter of Mason Anderson, Trustee of the Trust, bearing interest at 7% per annum, and secured by Shares of Beneficial Interest in the Trust. Due in monthly principal and interest payments of $574 through June 2009. |
|
26,115 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Note payable to The Kathy Anderson, daughter of Mason Anderson, Trustee of the Trust, bearing interest at 7% per annum, and secured by Shares of Beneficial Interest in the Trust. Due in monthly principal and interest payments of $495 through June 2009. |
|
22,512 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Note payable to Steve Robson, Trustee of the Trust, paid in full during fiscal year 2005 with Shares of Beneficial Interest in the Trust. |
|
|
|
239,667 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Unsecured notes payable to Rare Earth Financial, L.L.C., an affiliate of Mr. Wirth, paid in full during fiscal year 2005. |
|
|
|
514,500 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Unsecured note payable to Rare Earth Financial, L.L.C., an affiliate of Mr. Wirth, paid in full during fiscal year 2005 in connection with the sale of the Tempe property. |
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Note payable to Rare Earth Financial, L.L.C., an affiliate of Mr. Wirth, bearing interest at 7% per annum, paid in full during fiscal year 2005 in connection with the sale of the Tempe property. |
|
|
|
2,072,893 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Note payable to Rare Earth Financial, L.L.C., an affiliate of Mr. Wirth, paid in full during fiscal year 2005 in connection with the sale of the Tempe property |
|
|
|
1,379,646 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Note payable to Hulsey Hotels Corporation, an affiliate of Mr. Wirth, paid in full during fiscal year 2005. |
|
|
|
356,550 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Note payable to Mr. Wirth, bearing interest at 7% per annum, paid in full during fiscal year 2005 |
|
|
|
187,230 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Unsecured note payable to Mr. Wirth, paid in full during fiscal year 2005. |
|
|
|
101,755 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Totals |
|
$ |
93,512 |
|
$ |
6,852,241 |
|
53
During the second and third quarters of fiscal year 2004, the Trust issued five promissory notes in the amount of $208,000, $75,000, $200,000, $110,000 and $60,000 to Rare Earth Development Company, an affiliate of Mr. Wirth, all of which were paid in full in the third quarter of fiscal year 2004 utilizing a portion of the cash proceeds from the sale of the Buena Park property.
During the second quarter of fiscal year 2004, the Trust issued a promissory note in the amount of $225,000 to Rare Earth Financial, L.L.C., an affiliate of Mr. Wirth, which was paid in full in the third quarter of fiscal year 2004 utilizing a portion of the cash proceeds from the sale of the Buena Park property.
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2005, the Trust repurchased 433,036 Class B limited partnership units in the Partnership from affiliates of Mr. Wirth, issuing promissory notes in the aggregate amount of $974,331. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2005, the Trust repaid $449,500 of these notes. During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005, the Trust repaid the remaining balance of these notes with Shares of Beneficial Interest with an aggregate value of $467,552. Additionally, Mr. Wirth converted 100,000 Class B limited partnership units in the Partnership into 100,000 Shares of Beneficial Interest.
As of February 2, 2004, J. R. Chase, the sole stockholder of the Management Company, agreed to transfer 32,363 Shares of Beneficial Interest in the Trust to the Management Company in order to facilitate the Management Companys acquisition of Licensing Corp. from Mr. Wirth. In consideration of the transfer of those Shares, the Management Company agreed to pay Mr. Chase $72,817. The Management Company fully satisfied this obligation during June 2004. See Note 20, Purchase of Management and Licensing Contracts.
During the second quarter of fiscal year 2005, the Trust issued promissory notes totaling $83,000 to affiliates of Mason Anderson, who subsequently became a Trustee of the Trust, in exchange for 47,084 Shares of Beneficial Interest in the Trust.
During the second quarter of fiscal year 2005, the Trust issued 55,423 Shares of Beneficial Interest to satisfy unpaid principal and interest totaling $95,882 to Mr. Robson, a Trustee of the Trust.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005, the Partnership reclassified $700,000 of advances payable to Rare Earth Financial, L.L.C., an affiliate of Mr. Wirth, to a deposit for the purchase of the Phoenix, Arizona hotel property by another affiliate of Mr. Wirth.
The Trust paid interest on related party notes to Mr. Wirth and his affiliates in the amounts of $439,294, $205,101 and $28,373 for the twelve months ended January 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The Trust incurred interest expense on related party notes to Mr. Wirth and his affiliates in the amounts of $117,500, $515,214 and $623,522 for the twelve months ended January 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Continued Listing with the American Stock Exchange
See Item 7 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Continued Listing with the American Stock Exchange, for a discussion of the interests of Mr. Wirth and his affiliates in the transactions that implemented the Trusts plan to regain compliance with Amexs continued listing standards. All of these transactions were approved by the shareholders and the independent Trustees of the Trust.
All related party transactions are subject to appropriate review and oversight by the Audit Committee of the Board of Trustees.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Audit Fees
The aggregate fees for professional services rendered by EWC for the audit of the Trusts annual financial statements for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2005 were $61,000. The aggregate fees for professional services rendered by McGladrey for the audit of the Trusts annual financial statements for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2005 and January 31, 2004 were $78,130 and $134,463, respectively. The aggregate fees for professional services rendered by McGladrey for reviewing the interim financial statements included in the Trusts quarterly reports on Form 10-Q filed during the fiscal years ended January 31, 2005 and January 31, 2004 were $60,220 and $27,000, respectively.
54
Audit-Related Fees
The aggregate fees for EWC audit-related services, such as consents and assistance with and review of documents filed with the Commission, were $0 for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2005. The aggregate fees for McGladrey audit-related services, such as comfort letters, consents and assistance with and review of documents filed with the Commission, were $0 and $7,081 for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2005 and January 31, 2004, respectively. The Audit Committee pre-approved all audit-related fees billed for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2005.
Tax Fees
The aggregate fees for EWC tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2005 were $25,000. The aggregate fees for McGladrey tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2005 and January 31, 2004 were $2,935 and $78,640, respectively. The Audit Committee pre-approved all tax fees billed for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2005.
All Other Fees
The aggregate fees for all other services rendered by EWC during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2005 were $0. The aggregate fees for all other services rendered by McGladrey during the fiscal years ended January 31, 2005 and January 31, 2004 were $0 and $750, respectively. These fees represent amounts paid for the issuance of consents. The Audit Committee pre-approved all other fees billed for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2005.
The Audit Committee of the Trust has considered whether the provision of these services, other than the audit of the Trusts annual financial statements, is compatible with EWC and McGladrey maintaining their respective independence from the Trust.
The Audit Committee pre-approves all fees for services performed by EWC, including audit and non-audit services. Unless a type of service EWC provided received general pre-approval, it will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee. Any proposed services exceeding pre-approved cost levels will require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee. The term of any pre-approval is 12 months from the date of pre-approval, unless the Audit Committee specifically provides for a different period.
Since May 6, 2003, the effective date of Commission rules requiring Audit Committee pre-approval of audit and non-audit services performed by the Trusts independent auditors, all of the services provided by EWC and McGladrey were approved in accordance with the policies and procedures described above.
55
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)(1) and (2) Financial Statements and Schedules
|
Financial Statements/Schedules of InnSuites Hospitality Trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Reports of Independent Certified Public Accountants |
|
|
|
||
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended January 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended January 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended January 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
(a)(3) |
|
Exhibit List |
Exhibit No. |
|
Exhibit |
3.1 |
|
Second Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of InnSuites Hospitality Trust dated June 16, 1998, as further amended on July 12, 1999. |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of RRF Limited Partnership dated January 31, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-2, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 8, 1998). |
|
|
|
10.2* |
|
Employment Agreement dated as of January 31, 1998, between InnSuites Hospitality Trust and James F. Wirth. |
|
|
|
10.3* |
|
Indemnity Agreement dated February 3, 2004 between InnSuites Hospitality Trust and each of James F. Wirth, Marc E. Berg, Steven S. Robson, Peter A. Thoma, and Anthony B. Waters (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 30, 2004). |
|
|
|
10.4* |
|
Indemnification Agreement dated January 4, 2005 between InnSuites Hospitality Trust and Mason E. Anderson (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 7, 2005). |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
Debt Exchange Agreement effective January 31, 2005 between InnSuites Hospitality Trust and RRF Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 4, 2005). |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
Yuma Acquisition Agreement effective January 31, 2005 between InnSuites Hospitality Trust and RRF Limited Partnership (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 4, 2005). |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
Note Exchange Agreement effective January 31, 2005 between InnSuites Hospitality Trust and Hulsey Hotels Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 4, 2005). |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
Note Exchange Agreement effective January 31, 2005 between InnSuites Hospitality Trust and the note holders named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 4, 2005). |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
Class B Units Conversion Agreement effective January 31, 2005 between InnSuites Hospitality Trust and the Class B Unit holders named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 4, 2005). |
|
|
|
10.10 |
|
Promissory Note dated July 26, 2002 by InnSuites Hospitality Trust in favor of The Anderson Charitable Remainder Unitrust. |
56
14 |
|
Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14 of the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 30, 2004). |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant. |
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
Consent of Epstein, Weber & Conover, P.L.C., Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. |
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
Consent of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
57
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Trust has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
INNSUITES HOSPITALITY TRUST |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: May 16, 2005 |
By: |
/s/ James F. Wirth |
|
|
James F. Wirth, Chairman,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: May 16, 2005 |
By: |
/s/ Anthony B. Waters |
|
|
Anthony B. Waters, Chief Financial Officer
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Trust and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Dated: May 16, 2005 |
By: |
/s/ James F. Wirth |
|
|
James F. Wirth, Chairman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: May 16, 2005 |
By: |
/s/ Anthony B. Waters |
|
|
Anthony B. Waters, Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: May 16, 2005 |
By: |
/s/ Marc E. Berg |
|
|
Marc E. Berg, Trustee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: May 16, 2005 |
By: |
/s/ Steven S. Robson |
|
|
Steven S. Robson, Trustee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: May 16, 2005 |
By: |
/s/ Peter A. Thoma |
|
|
Peter A. Thoma, Trustee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: May 16, 2005 |
By: |
/s/ Mason E. Anderson |
|
|
Mason E. Anderson, Trustee |
58
Exhibit 3.1
SECOND AMENDED
AND RESTATED
DECLARATION OF TRUST
OF
INNSUITES HOSPITALITY TRUST
Adopted June 16, 1998
Amended July 12, 1999
SECOND AMENDED
AND RESTATED
DECLARATION OF TRUST
OF
INNSUITES HOSPITALITY TRUST
This Second Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust made as of this day of June, 1998 by James F. Wirth, Marc E. Berg, Steve Robson, Gregory D. Bruhn, Lee J. Flory and Edward G. Hill (such persons, so long as they shall continue in office in accordance with the terms of this Declaration of Trust, and all other persons who at the time in question have been duly elected or appointed as trustees in accordance with the provisions of this Declaration of Trust and are then in office, are hereinafter together called the Trustees),
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, this instrument amends and restates that certain First Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust made June 11, 1971 by James H. Berick, Chester F. Collier, Glenn Golenberg, Sidney S. Hein, Alvin M. Kendis, Frank L. Kennard, Alan M. Krause, Alfred Lerner, Maurice Saltzman, A. A. Sommer Sr. and Irving I. Shore (the Original Trustees), which Declaration of Trust is hereby amended and restated in its entirety pursuant to Section 13.1 thereof to read as hereinafter provided; and
WHEREAS, the Original Trustees formed an unincorporated association in the form of a business trust, formerly known as Realty ReFund Trust, which trust has qualified as a real estate investment trust under the REIT Provisions of the Internal Revenue Code;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Trustees hereby declare that they will hold all property of every type and description which they are acquiring or may hereafter acquire as such Trustees, together with the proceeds, rents and income thereof and therefrom, in trust, to manage and dispose of the same for the benefit of the holders of record from time to time of the certificates for Shares issued and to be issued hereunder and in the manner and subject to the provisions hereof, to wit:
Adviser shall mean any Person appointed, employed or contracted with by the Trustees under the provisions of Section 3.1 hereof.
Affiliate shall mean in respect of any Person (the First Person), any other Person (a) who directly or indirectly controls, is controlled by or is under common control with the First Person, or (b) who is a director, officer, employee, partner or trustee of the First Person, or of which the First Person is a director, officer, employee, partner or trustee, or (c) who directly or indirectly beneficially owns, controls or holds with power to vote one percent (1%) or more of the outstanding voting securities of the First Person, or of which the First Person directly or indirectly beneficially owns, controls or holds with power to vote one percent (1%) or more of the outstanding voting securities.
Appraisal shall mean a determination of the fair market value, as of the date of the Appraisal, of Real Property in its existing state or in a state to be created, by any bank, insurance company or other Person which makes appraisals in connection with its lending, investment, syndication, brokerage or servicing activities (whether or not an Affiliate of the Adviser), or by a disinterested Person having no economic interest in the Real Property provided any such Person is, in the sole judgment of the Trustees, properly qualified to make such a determination.
Certificates of Deposit shall mean evidences of deposits in, or obligations of, banking institutions and savings institutions which are members of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or of the Federal Home Loan Bank System.
Commercial Paper shall mean indebtedness of the Trust evidenced by unsecured promissory notes maturing not more than 270 days after the date of issue.
Declaration of Trust shall mean this Second Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust as amended, restated or modified from time to time. References in this Declaration of Trust to Declaration, hereof, herein and hereunder shall be deemed to refer to the Declaration
2
of Trust and shall not be limited to the particular text, article or section in which such words appear.
Equity Investments in Real Property shall mean investments in the ownership of, or participations in the ownership of, Real Property including the development thereof and any interest therein other than Mortgage Loans, or of any type of interest in any corporate or other entity principally involved in owning, developing, improving, financing, operating or managing Real Property.
Government Securities shall mean Securities which are obligations of, or guaranteed by, the United States Government, any State or Territory of the United States of America, or any agency or political subdivision thereof, including, without limitation, all Government Securities from time to time constituting qualified real estate investment trust assets under the Internal Revenue Code.
Mortgage Loans shall mean loans evidenced by notes, debentures, bonds and other evidences of indebtedness or obligations, which are negotiable or non-negotiable and which are secured or collateralized by Mortgages.
Mortgages shall mean mortgages, deeds of trust or other security interests in Real Property or on rights or interests, including leasehold interests, in Real Property.
Net Assets shall mean the Total Assets of the Trust after deducting therefrom any liabilities of the Trust except that depreciable assets shall be included therein at the fair market value of such assets in the judgment of the Trustees.
Non-Recourse Indebtedness shall mean indebtedness of the Trust incurred in connection with the acquisition of any asset wherein the liability of the Trust is limited to the asset acquired and income and proceeds attributable thereto or derived therefrom and which does not represent a general obligation of the Trust.
Person shall mean and include individuals, corporations, limited partnerships, limited liability companies, general partnerships, joint stock companies or associations, joint ventures, associations, companies, trusts, banks, trust companies, land trusts, business trusts, or other entities whether or not legal entities and governments and agencies and political subdivisions thereof.
Real Property shall mean land, rights in land, interests (including, without limitation, air rights and leasehold interests as lessee or lessor), and buildings, structures, improvements, furniture and fixtures located on or used in connection with land and rights in land, or interests therein, but not including Mortgages, Mortgage Loans or interests therein.
REIT Provisions of the Internal Revenue Code shall mean the statutory provisions presently contained in Part II, Subchapter M of Chapter 1, Sections 856 through 858 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as now enacted or hereafter amended, or successor statutes and regulations and rulings promulgated thereunder; provided, however, that any such statute, regulation or ruling enacted or promulgated after the date hereof which is by its terms applicable to real estate investment trusts in existence on the date hereof only upon the election of, or failure
3
to elect otherwise by, such trust, shall be applicable to this Trust only if this Trust shall so elect or fail to elect otherwise in accordance with the terms thereof.
Securities shall mean any stock, shares, voting trust certificates, bonds, debentures, notes, or other evidences of indebtedness, secured or unsecured, convertible, subordinated or otherwise or in general any instruments commonly known as securities or any certificates of interest, shares or participations in temporary or interim certificates for, guarantees of or any right to subscribe to, purchase or acquire any of the foregoing.
Securities of the Trust shall mean any Securities issued by the Trust.
Shareholders shall mean as of any particular time all holders of record of outstanding Shares at such time.
Shares shall mean the shares of beneficial interest of the Trust as described in Section 6.1.
Short-Term in relation to loans shall mean loans other than Long-Term or Intermediate-Term loans.
Total Assets of the Trust shall mean the aggregate appraised value of all of the assets included in the Trust Property, without deduction for mortgage loans or other security interests to which such assets are subject or subordinate and before provision for depreciation, depletion and amortization but after provision for bad debt loss and similar reserves.
Trust Property shall mean as of any particular time any and all property, real, personal or otherwise, tangible or intangible, which is transferred, conveyed or paid to the Trust or Trustees and all rents, income, profits and gains therefrom and which at such time is owned or held by, or for the account of, the Trust or the Trustees.
4
In the exercise of their powers, the Trustees shall not be limited to investing in obligations maturing before the possible termination of the Trust, nor shall the Trustees be limited by any law now or hereafter in effect limiting the investments which may be held or retained by trustees or other fiduciaries, but they shall have full authority and power to make any and all investments within the limitations of this Declaration of Trust, that they, in their absolute discretion, shall determine, and without liability for loss, even though such investments shall be of a character or an amount not considered proper for the investment of trust funds or which do not or may not produce income.
The right, title and interest of the Trustees in and to the Trust Property shall vest automatically in all persons who may hereafter become Trustees upon their due election and qualification without any further act. Upon the resignation, removal or death of a Trustee he (and in the event of his death, his estate) shall automatically cease to have any right, title or interest in or to any of the Trust Property as a Trustee, and such right, title and interest of such Trustee in and to the Trust Property shall vest automatically in the remaining Trustees without any further act. Such vesting and cessation of title shall be effective whether or not conveyancing documents have been executed and delivered.
5
The Trustees shall have power to issue any type of Securities of the Trust, without vote of or other action by the Shareholders, to such Persons for such cash, property, services, expenses or other consideration (including Securities issued or created by, or interests in, any Person) at such time or times and in such amounts and in such manner and on such terms as the Trustees may deem advisable and to list any of the foregoing Securities of the Trust or any depositary receipts representing such Securities on any securities exchange and to purchase or otherwise acquire, hold, cancel, reissue, sell and transfer any such Securities of the Trust or any depositary receipts representing such Securities. The Trustees may authorize the use of facsimile signatures and/or a facsimile seal of the Trust on Securities of the Trust or any depositary receipts representing such Securities, provided that where facsimile signatures are so used, one of the authorized signatures be manual or the Securities or any such depositary receipts be manually countersigned or authenticated (except in respect of any type of Security in respect of which then current commercial practice does not require manual countersignature or manual authentication) by a transfer agent or registrar or by an authenticating agent or trustee or similar Person. In case any Person who shall have signed (or whose facsimile signature shall appear on) Securities of the Trust or any such depositary receipts shall have ceased to occupy the office or perform the
6
function in respect of which such signature was authorized before such Securities or any such depositary receipts shall have been actually issued, such S ecurities or any such depositary receipts may nevertheless be issued with the same effect as though such Person had not ceased to occupy such office or perform such function.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
The Trust shall indemnify each of its Trustees, officers, employees and agents (including those who serve at its request as directors, officers, partners, trustees or the like of another Person in which it has any interest as a shareholder, creditor or otherwise), against all liabilities and expenses, including amounts paid in satisfaction of judgments, in compromise or as fines and penalties, and counsel fees, reasonably incurred by him in connection with the defense or disposition of any action, suit or other proceeding by the Trust or any other Person, whether civil or criminal, in which he may be involved or with which he may be threatened, while in office or thereafter, by reason of his being or having been such a Trustee, officer, employee or agent, except in respect of any matter as to which he shall have been adjudicated to have acted in bad faith or with willful misconduct or reckless disregard of his duties or gross negligence or not to have acted in good faith in the reasonable belief that his action was in the best interests of the Trust; provided, however, that as to any matter disposed of by a compromise payment by such Trustee, officer, employee or agent, pursuant to a consent decree or otherwise, no indemnification either for said payment or for any other expenses shall be provided unless the Trust shall have received a written opinion from counsel approved by the Trustees to the effect that if the foregoing matters had been adjudicated, they would likely have been adjudicated in favor of such Trustee, officer, employee or agent or unless a meeting of the Trustees at which a quorum consisting of Trustees who are not parties to or threatened with such action, suit or other proceeding shall make such a determination. The rights accruing to any Trustee, officer, employee or agent under these provisions shall not exclude any other right to which he may be lawfully entitled; provided, however, that no Trustee, officer, employee or agent may satisfy any right of indemnity or reimbursement granted herein or to which he may be otherwise entitled except out of the Trust Property, and no Shareholder shall be personally liable to any Person in respect of any claim for indemnity or reimbursement or otherwise. The Trustees may make advance payments in connection with indemnification under this Section 5.3, provided that the indemnified Trustee, officer, employee or agent shall have given a written undertaking to
16
reimburse the Trust in the event it is subsequently determined that he is not entitled to such indemnification.
Any action taken by or conduct on the part of the Adviser, a Trustee, officer, employee or agent of the Trust in conformity with or in good faith reliance upon the provisions of Section 2.17 or Section 3.4 shall not, for the purposes of this Trust (including, without limitation, Sections 5.1 and 5.2 hereof and this Section 5.3) constitute bad faith, willful misconduct, gross negligence or reckless disregard of his duties, or failure to act in good faith in the reasonable belief that his action was in the best interests of the Trust.
17
18
19
Unless otherwise provided in any such resolution or resolutions, the number of Shares of the class or series authorized by such resolution or resolutions may be increased or decreased, but not below the number of Shares of such class or series then outstanding, by a certificate, setting forth a resolution or resolutions of the Trustees authorizing such increase or decrease, signed and acknowledged by the Chairman, a Vice Chairman, the President, if any, the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary of the Trust and filed in accordance with the requirements of Ohio law for filing amendments to this Declaration of Trust. Unless otherwise provided in such resolution or resolutions, any amendment to such resolution or resolutions may be effected by a certificate, setting forth a resolution of the Trustees authorizing such amendment and certifying that such amendment has been approved by such votes, if any, as may be required pursuant to Section 13.1, signed and acknowledged by the Chairman, a Vice Chairman, the President, if any, the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary of the Trust and filed in accordance with the requirements of Ohio law for filing amendments to this Declaration of Trust. Any such amendment may, without limitation, cancel or otherwise affect the right of the holder of the Shares of such class or series to receive dividends which have accrued but have not been declared. Holders of Common Shares shall not be entitled to vote on such amendments to any such resolutions.
20
In furtherance of the provisions of Section 8.5 hereof, each certificate evidencing Shares shall contain a legend imprinted thereon to the following effect, or such other legend as the Trustees may from time to time adopt.
Provisions Relating to Redemption and Prohibition of Transfer of Shares.
If necessary to effect compliance by the Trust with certain requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, the shares represented by this certificate are subject to redemption by the Trustees of the Trust and the transfer thereof may be prohibited upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Declaration of Trust. The Trust will furnish a copy of such terms and conditions to the registered holder of this certificate upon request and without charge.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Nothing contained in this Section 8.7 shall limit the authority of the Trust to take such other action as it deems necessary or advisable to protect the Trust and the interests of its shareholders by preservation of the Trusts status as a REIT and to ensure compliance with the Ownership Limit.
In the case of any ambiguity in the application of any provision of Sections 8.5 to 8.7, including any definition contained herein, the Board of Trustees shall have the power to determine the application of that provision.
Each certificate for Equity Shares shall bear the following legend:
The Common Shares or Preferred Shares represented by this certificate are subject to restrictions on transfer for the purpose of the Trusts maintenance of its status as a real estate investment trust under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code). No Person may (i) Beneficially Own or Constructively Own Common Shares in excess of 4.9% of the number of outstanding Common Shares, (ii) Beneficially Own or Constructively Own shares of any class or series of Preferred Shares in excess of 9% of the number of outstanding shares of that class or series of Preferred Shares, (iii) beneficially own Equity Shares that would result in the Equity Shares being beneficially owned by fewer than 100 Persons (determined without reference to any rules of attribution), (iv) Beneficially Own Equity Shares that would result in the Trust being closely held under Section 856(h) of the Code, or (v) Constructively Own Equity Shares that would cause the Trust to Constructively Own 10% or more of the ownership interests in a tenant of the Trusts or of a Subsidiarys real property, within the meaning of Section 856(d)(2)(B) of the Code. Each holder of Equity Shares is required to furnish the Trust such information as the Trust may request pursuant to Section 6 of the Trusts Second Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust. Any Person who attempts to Beneficially Own or Constructively Own Equity Shares in excess of the above limitations must immediately notify the Trust in
33
writing. If those restrictions are violated, the Equity Shares represented hereby in excess of those limitations will be transferred automatically by operation of the Trusts Second Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust to a Trust and will be designated Shares-in-Trust. All capitalized terms in this legend have the meanings defined in the Trusts Second Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, as they may be amended from time to time, a copy of which, including the restrictions on transfer, will be sent without charge to each shareholder who so requests.
Each provision of Sections 8.5 to 8.9 shall be several, and an adverse determination as to any such provision shall in no way affect the validity of any other provision.
34
35
36
37
Any Investment Committee may act with or without a meeting. A quorum for all meetings of any such Committee shall be a majority of members thereof in office. Unless specifically provided otherwise in this Declaration of Trust, any action of any Investment Committee may be taken at a meeting by vote of a majority of the members present (a quorum being present) or without a meeting by written consents of a majority of the members.
In respect of actions of the Trustees and any Investment Committee, Trustees who are affiliated within the meaning of Section 2.17 hereof or otherwise interested in any action to be taken may be counted for quorum purposes under this Section 10.5 and shall be entitled to vote.
All or any one or more Trustees may participate in a meeting of the Trustees or any committee thereof by means of conference telephone or similar communications equipment by means of which all persons participating in the meeting can hear each other and participation in a meeting pursuant to such communications shall constitute presence in person at such meeting. The minutes of any meeting of Trustees held by telephone shall be prepared in the same manner as a meeting of Trustees held in person.
38
39
Upon termination of the Trust and distribution to the Shareholders as herein provided, a majority of the Trustees shall execute and lodge among the records of the Trust an instrument in writing setting forth the fact of such termination, and the Trustees shall thereupon be discharged
40
from all further liabilities and duties hereunder, and the right, title and interest of all Shareholders shall cease and be cancelled and discharged.
41
Michael G. Berick |
Randolph D. Lerner |
14518 Shaker Boulevard |
18020 South Woodland |
Shaker Heights, Ohio |
Shaker Heights, Ohio |
Born: January 1, 1960 |
Born: February 21, 1962 |
|
|
Daniel G. Berick |
Marc B. Insul |
14518 Shaker Boulevard |
21810 Halburton |
Shaker Heights, Ohio |
Beachwood, Ohio |
Born: June 25, 1962 |
Born: July 4, 1968 |
|
|
Robert G. Berick |
Linda S. Pearlman |
14518 Shaker Boulevard |
22659 Fairmont Boulevard |
Shaker Heights, Ohio |
Shaker Heights, Ohio |
Born: September 19, 1966 |
Born: August 9, 1966 |
|
|
Joshua J. G. Berick |
Caren E. Pearlman |
14518 Shaker Boulevard |
22659 Fairmont Boulevard |
Shaker Heights, Ohio |
Shaker Heights, Ohio |
Born: November 20, 1969 |
Born: April 18, 1969 |
42
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed these presents on the day and year first above written.
Signed and acknowledged
in the presence of:
/s/ J. R. Chase |
|
/s/ James F. Wirth |
|
|
|
James F. Wirth |
|
/s/ Barbara E. Rudolph |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Marc E. Berg |
|
/s/ Kevin W. Fell |
|
Marc E. Berg |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Vonnie Cayeaux |
|
/s/ Steve Robson |
|
|
|
Steve Robson |
|
Signature illegible |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Gregory D. Bruhn |
|
Signature illegible |
|
Gregory D. Bruhn |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James B. Aronoff |
|
/s/ Lee J. Flory |
|
|
|
Lee J. Flory |
|
/s/ Jeremy L. Trahan |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Edward G. Hill |
|
Signature illegible |
|
Edward G. Hill |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Gloria J. Sinclair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Linda A. Kilcoi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Edward A. Kast |
|
|
43
Exhibit 10.2
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into as of the 31 st day of January, 1998, by and between REALTY ReFUND TRUST, an unincorporated association in the form of a business trust organized under the laws of the State of Ohio having its principal business address at 1750 Huntington Building, 925 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44114 (the Trust), and JAMES F. WIRTH, c/o InnSuites Hotels LLC, 1615 East Northern Avenue, Suite 105, Phoenix, Arizona 85020-3998 (Employee).
RECITALS :
The Trust has been engaged since 1971 in the business of refinancing existing income-producing commercial, industrial and multi-unit residential real property by supplementing or replacing existing financing and is currently redirecting its business to developing and owning lodging properties. The Trust is party to an Advisory Agreement, dated as of June 15, 1971, as the same has been extended and amended (the Advisory Agreement), with Mid-America ReaFund Advisors, Inc. (The Adviser), assignee of ReaFund Advisors, Inc. Under the terms of the Advisory Agreement, the Adviser has agreed to furnish advice and recommendations in respect of all aspects of the business and affairs of the Trust and to furnish day-to-day administration for the Trust.
The Employee is Chairman, President and Director of the Adviser. He has, effective on the date hereof, also been elected Chairman and President of the Trust. The Trustees determined that it was desirable to provide for continuity and to assure the Trust that the services presently being furnished to it by the Adviser would be furnished by the Employee without any cost or expense to the Trust in excess of that called for under the terms of the Advisory Agreement in the event of any termination of the Advisory Agreement.
AGREEMENTS :
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and their mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows:
1. Employment
The Trust hereby employs Employee as the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Trust, and Employee hereby accepts such employment upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth.
2. Term
Subject to the provisions for earlier termination as hereinafter provided, this Agreement shall commence upon the execution hereof and shall continue through and including the 31st day of December, 2007.
1
3. Duties
(A) Employee shall devote such business time, attention and energies to the business of the Trust as he shall deem necessary to perform for the Trust all of the duties and services required of him hereunder and shall serve both diligently and to the best of his ability. Employee further shall perform such other duties as he shall deem to be normally incident to the positions of Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Trust. In addition to his duties as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, Employee shall perform or provide for the performance of all of the duties and services set forth in Section 1 of the Advisory Agreement; provided, however, that so long as the Advisory Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, the Advisor shall perform the Advisory duties thereunder.
(B) If the Trustees of the Trust request the Employee to engage in other activities which complement the Trusts investments, Employee may receive compensation or commissions therefor from the Trust or such other persons.
4. Compensation
During the term of this Agreement, so long as the Adviser is performing
its services and duties under the terms of the Advisory Agreement and being
paid compensation in respect thereof, the Trust shall not pay to the Employee
any monetary consideration. In the event that at any time during the term
hereof the Adviser shall cease to serve the Trust as its Adviser under the
terms of the Advisory Agreement and to receive compensation therefor
(regardless of the reason for such cessation), then and thereafter during the
remaining term of this Agreement the Employee shall receive as compensation in
full for all of his services hereunder an amount equal to one hundred percent
(100%) of the Regular Compensation and the Incentive Compensation that would
have been paid to the Adviser in respect of such period pursuant to Sections 9,
10 and
11(a) of the Advisory Agreement; and bear all expenses and pay all costs and
charges of the kind or nature that would have been paid or borne by the Adviser
prior to the termination of the Advisory Agreement.
In the event of cessation of the Advisory Agreement, the Employees compensation shall be subject to adjustment by the Trust in accordance with, and upon completion of, the annual audit of the Trusts financial statements, and subject to the same limitations on the compensation of Adviser as contained in Section 15 of the Advisory Agreement.
Employee shall, in addition to the foregoing, participate in any employee benefit programs established by the Trust, including, but not limited to, health and accident insurance, group life insurance, stock option plans, pension plans and profit sharing plans.
2
5. Termination
At the option of the Trust, this Agreement may be terminated immediately upon written notice of termination from the Trust to Employee if any of the following events shall occur:
(i) If Employee materially shall violate any provision of this Agreement and, after written notice of such violation, shall not cure such default within thirty (30) days (provided, however, that if Employee shall not be reasonably able to cure such default within such thirty (30) day period, if Employee shall not have commenced promptly to cure such default and diligently pursued the same to completion); or
(ii) If Employee shall die; or
(iii) If Employee shall become disabled for a period of twelve (12) consecutive months. As used herein, disabled shall mean such physical or mental impairment of Employee as shall result in his being unable to perform his full duties hereunder; or
(iv) If Employee shall so consent.
6. Covenant Against Competition
(A) During the period commencing with the date hereof and continuing until the latter of the expiration of the term of this Agreement or until December 31, 2008 if this Agreement shall be terminated for the reasons specified in Section 5(A)(i) hereof, Employee agrees that, except as an employee of the Adviser while the Adviser is serving as adviser to the Trust pursuant to the terms of the Advisory Agreement, Employee shall not, without the prior approval of the Trustees, directly or indirectly:
(i) Act as the investment advisor for any other person or entity (person) or enter into an investment advisory contract therewith or contract to perform other services with any other real estate investment trust or other person the investment policy of which is substantially similar to that of the Trust at that time. However, Employee may act as an investment advisor and perform other services for persons other than the Trust in situations in which such persons are participating in investments with the Trust or which have investment policies substantially dissimilar to that of the Trust.
(ii) Either as an individual for Employees own account or as an investor, or other participant in, or as an employee, agent or representative of, any other business enterprise:
3
(a) solicit, divert, entice, take away or interfere with, or attempt to solicit, divert, entice or take away or interfere with, any of the Trusts business, patronage, borrowers or investment opportunities except as permitted pursuant to Subparagraph (i) hereof; or
(b) engage or participate in or finance, aid or be connected with, any commercial enterprise which competes with any of the business activities which the Trust is conducting at such time.
The foregoing, however, shall not be deemed to prohibit the investment without a role in management by Employee in the equity or debt securities of any company otherwise within the ambit of this covenant and registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.
(B) If it shall be judicially determined that Employee has violated any of the covenants or agreements to be performed and/or observed by Employee pursuant to the provisions of this Section 6, then the period applicable to such of said covenants or agreements as shall have been so determined to have been violated by Employee shall automatically be extended by that period of time which shall be co-extensive with the period during which said violations have occurred.
(C) Subject only to the rules and procedures set forth in the Second Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, Employee can continue to engage in all facets of the real estate business and business affairs generally. Furthermore, subject to the foregoing, Employee, or any entity in which he is an officer, director, shareholder, employee, partner (general or limited) or otherwise interested, may borrow from the Trust or purchase properties on which the Trust is a lender.
Employee acknowledges that the covenants contained in this Section 6 are of the essence of this Agreement; said covenants shall be construed as independent of any other provisions of this Agreement; and the existence of any claim or cause of action by Employee against the Trust, whether predicated on this Agreement or otherwise, shall not constitute a defense to the enforcement by the Trust of these covenants.
Recognizing the irreparable nature of the injury that could result from Employees violation of any of the covenants and agreements to be performed and/or observed by Employee pursuant to the provisions of this Section 6, and that damages would be inadequate compensation, it is agreed that any violation by Employee of the provisions of this Section 6 shall be the proper subject for immediate injunctive and other equitable relief to the Trust. Employee further agrees to communicate the contents of this Section 6 to any prospective employer or associate of Employee which has an investment policy which is substantially similar to that of the Trust.
4
7. Governing Law
The laws of the State of Arizona shall govern the validity, performance and enforcement of this Agreement. If any of the terms or provisions of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement or the application of such term or provision to persons or circumstances other than those to which it is held invalid or unenforceable shall not be affected thereby, and each term and provision of this Agreement shall be valid and be enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law. If the invalidity or unenforceablitiy of any covenant or restriction herein is due to the unreasonableness of the time or the fact that no geographical area is specified for the coverage of any said covenant or restriction, the said covenant or restriction shall nevertheless be effective for such period of time and for such geographical area as may be determined by a court of competent jurisdiction.
8. Assignment
This Agreement shall not be assignable by the Trust without the written consent of Employee.
9. The Entire Agreement
The foregoing is the entire agreement of the parties hereto in respect of the subject matter hereof, and no waiver, amendment or modification hereof shall be valid unless in writing and signed by both parties.
10. Counterparts
This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
11. Notices
All notices hereunder shall be in writing and delivered or mailed by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the parties at the addresses listed below or to such other address as the Trust or Employee may hereafter designate in writing to the other. A copy of any such notice shall also be telecopied at the time of its mailing to the number listed below for the relevant party.
5
12. The Trust
The name Realty ReFund Trust is the designation of the Trustees under a Declaration of Trust dated April 28, 1971, as amended, and all persons dealing with Realty ReFund Trust must look solely to the Trust property for the enforcement of any claims against Realty ReFund Trust as neither the Trustees, officers, agents nor security holders assume any personal liabilities for covenants or obligations entered into on behalf of Realty ReFund Trust and their respective properties shall not be subject to any claims of any other person in respect of such liability.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written, the Trust pursuant to the authorization of its Trustees.
|
REALTY ReFUND TRUST |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
By: |
/s/ Gregory D. Bruhn |
|
|
Gregory D. Bruhn |
||
|
Executive Vice President |
||
|
1750 Huntington Building |
||
|
925 Euclid Avenue |
||
|
Cleveland, Ohio 44114 |
||
|
Phone: (216) 622-0046 |
||
|
Fax: (216) 622-1477 |
||
|
|
||
|
THE TRUST |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
/s/ James F. Wirth |
|
|
|
James F. Wirth |
||
|
1615 E. Northern Avenue |
||
|
Suite 105 |
||
|
Phoenix, Arizona 85020 |
||
|
Phone: (602) 944-1500 |
||
|
Fax: (602) 678-0281 |
||
|
|
||
|
EMPLOYEE |
6
Exhibit 10.10
PROMISSORY NOTE
$78,000 |
|
July 26, 2002 |
FOR VALUED RECEIVED, and legally bound hereby, INNSUITES HOSPITALITY TRUST (Maker), an Ohio real estate investment trust, having an office at 1615 East Northern Avenue, Suite 102, Phoenix, Arizona 85020 hereby promises to pay to The Anderson Charitable Remainder Unitrust (Note Holder) or order and address as specified below the principal sum of SEVENTY EIGHT THOUSAND 00/100 DOLLARS ($78,000), with interest on the unpaid principal balance thereon from time to time outstanding, at the rate of seven percent (7.00%) per annum, computed on a three hundred sixty (360)-day year, to be due and payable in installments of principal and interest as follows:
(A) $78,000 amortized over 36 months at 7% interest ($2,408.41/month). This Note is non-recourse secured by 40,500 InnSuites Hospitality Trust shares. Monthly installments of principal and interest to begin 30 days after the delivery of the shares.
(B) Payments to be made payable to:
The Anderson Charitable Remainder Unitrust
3024 W/ Sahuaro Dr.
Phoenix, AZ 85029
The 40,500 InnSuites Hospitality Trust shares will remain as security for the unpaid balance on the Note.
At the option of the Note Holder, late charges upon written notice are assessed as follows:
10 days late, $50 penalty
35 days late, $150 penalty
Over 35 days late, Note Holder could declare the note in default and call the entire amount due.
Should default be declared, units proportionate to unpaid balance will be returned to Note Holder.
Principal and interest payable in lawful money of the United States.
If legal proceedings are entered into to recover on this Note, the undersigned agree(s) to pay such sum as the Court may fix as attorneys fees.
The Makers and endorsers hereof severally waive diligence, demand, presentment for payment and protest, and consent to the extension or time of payment of this Note without notice.
|
INNSUITES HOSPITALITY
TRUST,
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
By: |
/s/ Marc E. Berg |
|
||
|
|
Name: |
Marc E. Berg |
|||
|
|
Title: |
Secretary Treasurer |
|||
1
Exhibit 21
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
1. RRF Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership.
2. Yuma Hospitality Properties, Ltd., an Arizona limited partnership.
3. Northern Phoenix Investment Limited Partnership, an Arizona limited partnership.
4. Tucscon Hospitality Properties, Ltd, an Arizona limited partnership.
5. Ontario Hospitality Properties Limited Partnership, an Arizona limited partnership.
6. Tucson St. Marys Suite Hospitality LLC, an Arizona limited liability company.
7. Albuquerque Suite Hospitality LLC, an Arizona limited liability company.
8. InnSuites Hotels, Inc., an Arizona corporation.
Exhibit 23.1
Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No. 333-46030) on Form S-8 of InnSuites Hospitality Trust and subsidiaries of our report dated May 5, 2005, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K as of January 31, 2005 and for the year then ended.
|
/s/ EPSTEIN, WEBER & CONOVER, P.L.C. |
|
Scottsdale, Arizona |
||
May 5, 2005 |
Exhibit 23.2
Independent Auditors Consent
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-46030 of InnSuites Hospitality Trust on Form S-8 of our report, dated March 12, 2004, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of InnSuites Hospitality Trust for the years ended January 31, 2004 and 2003.
/s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP |
|
Phoenix, Arizona |
|
May 13, 2005 |
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, James F. Wirth, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of InnSuites Hospitality Trust;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 16, 2005 |
By: |
/s/ James F. Wirth |
|
|
|
Name: James F. Wirth |
|
|
|
Title: Chief Executive Officer |
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Anthony B. Waters, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of InnSuites Hospitality Trust;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 16, 2005 |
By: |
/s/ Anthony B. Waters |
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Anthony B. Waters |
|
|
|
Title: |
Chief Financial Officer |
|
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, James F. Wirth, Chief Executive Officer of InnSuites Hospitality Trust (the Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended January 31, 2005 (the Annual Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: May 16, 2005 |
By: |
/s/ James F. Wirth |
|
|
|
Name: James F. Wirth |
|
|
|
Title: Chief Executive Officer |
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Anthony B. Waters, Chief Financial Officer of InnSuites Hospitality Trust (the Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended January 31, 2005 (the Annual Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: May 16, 2005 |
By: |
/s/ Anthony B. Waters |
|
|
|
Name: Anthony B. Waters |
|
|
|
Title: Chief Financial Officer |