SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
ý |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2006 |
||
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE |
|
|
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For the transition period from to |
||
|
|
|
Commission File Number 1-8036 |
WEST PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Pennsylvania |
|
23-1210010 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
incorporation or organization) |
|
|
|
|
|
101 Gordon Drive, PO Box 645, |
|
|
Lionville, PA |
|
19341-0645 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: 610-594-2900
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filed. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ý |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o |
Indicated by check mark whether the registrant
is a shell company (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
o
No
ý
As of March 31, 2006, there were 32,302,249 shares of the Registrants common stock outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
CAUTIONARY FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS
(Cautionary Statements Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995)
Our disclosure and analysis in this Form 10-Q contains some forward-looking statements that set forth anticipated results based on managements plans and assumptions. Such statements give our current expectations or forecasts of future events they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. In particular, these include statements concerning future actions, future performance or results of current and anticipated products, sales efforts, expenses, the outcome of contingencies such as legal proceedings and financial results. We have tried, wherever possible, to identify such statements by using words such as estimate, expect, intend, believe, plan, anticipate and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance or condition.
We cannot guarantee that any forward-looking statement will be realized. If known or unknown risks or uncertainties materialize, or if underlying assumptions are inaccurate, actual results could differ materially from past results and those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statement. You should bear this in mind as you consider forward-looking statements. We cannot predict or identify all such risks and uncertainties, but factors that could cause the actual results to differ materially from expected and historical results include the following: sales demand; timing and commercial success of customers products incorporating our products and services, including specifically, the Exubera® Inhalation-Powder insulin device; customers changes to inventory requirements and manufacturing plans that alter existing orders or ordering patterns for our products; our ability to pass raw-material cost increases on to customers through price increases; maintaining or improving production efficiencies and overhead absorption; physical limits on manufacturing capacity that may limit our ability to satisfy anticipated demand; the availability of labor to meet increased demand; competition from other providers; the successful integration of acquired businesses; average profitability, or mix, of products sold in a reporting period; financial performance of unconsolidated affiliates; strength of the U.S. dollar in relation to other currencies, particularly the Euro, UK Pound, Danish Krone, Japanese Yen and Singapore Dollar; interruptions or weaknesses in our supply chain, which could cause delivery delays or restrict the availability of raw materials and key bought-in components; raw-material price escalation, particularly petroleum-based raw materials, and energy costs; and availability and pricing of materials that may be affected by vendor concerns with exposure to product-related liability.
We undertake no obligation to publicly update forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
All trademarks and registered trademarks used in this report are property of West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., unless noted otherwise.
3
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
||
Net sales |
|
$ |
222,800 |
|
$ |
149,500 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
155,900 |
|
103,100 |
|
||
Gross profit |
|
66,900 |
|
46,400 |
|
||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
38,000 |
|
25,200 |
|
||
Other expense, net |
|
700 |
|
1,100 |
|
||
Operating profit |
|
28,200 |
|
20,100 |
|
||
Loss on debt extinguishment |
|
5,900 |
|
|
|
||
Interest expense, net |
|
3,000 |
|
2,000 |
|
||
Income before income taxes and minority interests |
|
19,300 |
|
18,100 |
|
||
Provision for income taxes |
|
5,400 |
|
5,700 |
|
||
Minority interests |
|
100 |
|
|
|
||
Income from consolidated operations |
|
13,800 |
|
12,400 |
|
||
Equity in net income of affiliated companies |
|
500 |
|
600 |
|
||
Income from continuing operations |
|
14,300 |
|
13,000 |
|
||
Discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
3,800 |
|
300 |
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
18,100 |
|
$ |
13,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
0.12 |
|
0.01 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Assuming dilution: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
0.12 |
|
0.01 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Average common shares outstanding |
|
31,754 |
|
30,645 |
|
||
Average shares assuming dilution |
|
33,125 |
|
31,775 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(in thousands) |
|
March 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash, including cash equivalents |
|
$ |
31,300 |
|
$ |
48,800 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
124,200 |
|
107,400 |
|
||
Inventories |
|
86,300 |
|
71,100 |
|
||
Income tax refundable |
|
2,400 |
|
3,100 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
2,400 |
|
2,400 |
|
||
Other current assets |
|
16,600 |
|
14,300 |
|
||
Total current assets |
|
263,200 |
|
247,100 |
|
||
Property, plant and equipment |
|
662,300 |
|
647,200 |
|
||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
331,800 |
|
319,200 |
|
||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
330,500 |
|
328,000 |
|
||
Investments in and advances to affiliated companies |
|
27,500 |
|
27,700 |
|
||
Goodwill |
|
89,900 |
|
89,500 |
|
||
Pension asset |
|
45,700 |
|
47,100 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
8,500 |
|
8,300 |
|
||
Intangible assets, net |
|
68,500 |
|
69,700 |
|
||
Restricted cash |
|
7,200 |
|
7,100 |
|
||
Other assets |
|
10,500 |
|
9,000 |
|
||
Total Assets |
|
$ |
851,500 |
|
$ |
833,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Notes payable and other current debt |
|
$ |
400 |
|
$ |
300 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
47,400 |
|
46,300 |
|
||
Accrued expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Salaries, wages and benefits |
|
24,800 |
|
25,700 |
|
||
Income taxes payable |
|
17,700 |
|
15,900 |
|
||
Restructuring costs |
|
- |
|
200 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
8,200 |
|
8,300 |
|
||
Other |
|
34,900 |
|
31,600 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
133,400 |
|
128,300 |
|
||
Long-term debt |
|
270,600 |
|
280,700 |
|
||
Deferred income taxes |
|
29,900 |
|
31,900 |
|
||
Other long-term liabilities |
|
51,700 |
|
48,600 |
|
||
Total Liabilities |
|
485,600 |
|
489,500 |
|
||
Minority interests |
|
4,100 |
|
4,100 |
|
||
Shareholders equity |
|
361,800 |
|
339,900 |
|
||
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
$ |
851,500 |
|
$ |
833,500 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY (UNAUDITED)
West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
|
||||||||||
(in thousands) |
|
Number
|
|
Common
|
|
Capital in
|
|
Retained
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
Number of shares |
|
Treasury
|
|
Total |
|
||||||
Balance, December 31, 2005 As Previously Reported |
|
34,330 |
|
$ |
8,600 |
|
$ |
39,300 |
|
$ |
318,600 |
|
$ |
8,900 |
|
(2,558 |
) |
$ |
(41,900 |
) |
$ |
333,500 |
|
Effect of change in method of accounting for inventories (See Note 2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,400 |
|
||||||
Balance, December 31, 2005 As Adjusted |
|
34,330 |
|
8,600 |
|
39,300 |
|
325,000 |
|
8,900 |
|
(2,558 |
) |
(41,900 |
) |
339,900 |
|
||||||
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,100 |
|
||||||
Shares issued under stock plans |
|
|
|
|
|
(1,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
547 |
|
5,700 |
|
4,200 |
|
||||||
Shares repurchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
(500 |
) |
(500 |
) |
||||||
Cash dividends declared ($.12 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,100 |
) |
||||||
Changes other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,200 |
|
||||||
Balance, March 31, 2006 |
|
34,330 |
|
$ |
8,600 |
|
$ |
37,800 |
|
$ |
339,000 |
|
$ |
13,100 |
|
(2,028 |
) |
$ |
(36,700 |
) |
$ |
361,800 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
||
Cash flows provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
18,100 |
|
$ |
13,300 |
|
Gain from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
(3,800 |
) |
(300 |
) |
||
Depreciation |
|
11,600 |
|
8,900 |
|
||
Amortization |
|
1,200 |
|
1,100 |
|
||
Loss on debt extinguishment |
|
5,900 |
|
|
|
||
Other non-cash items, net |
|
3,500 |
|
2,600 |
|
||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
|
(27,600 |
) |
(23,900 |
) |
||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
8,900 |
|
1,700 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Property, plant and equipment acquired |
|
(11,400 |
) |
(8,100 |
) |
||
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
(3,400 |
) |
||
Repayment of affiliate loan |
|
200 |
|
|
|
||
Other |
|
|
|
100 |
|
||
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
(11,200 |
) |
(11,400 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash flows used in financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Prepayment of senior notes |
|
(105,900 |
) |
|
|
||
Issuance of senior unsecured notes |
|
100,100 |
|
|
|
||
Net borrowings (repayments) under other debt agreements |
|
(10,500 |
) |
2,600 |
|
||
Repayment of other short-term debt |
|
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
||
Dividend payments |
|
(3,800 |
) |
(3,300 |
) |
||
Issuance of common stock |
|
4,200 |
|
3,000 |
|
||
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
(15,900 |
) |
(7,700 |
) |
||
Cash flows used in operating activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
(2,500 |
) |
||
Cash flows provided by investing activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
7,100 |
|
||
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations |
|
|
|
4,600 |
|
||
Effect of exchange rates on cash |
|
700 |
|
(2,000 |
) |
||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(17,500 |
) |
(14,800 |
) |
||
Cash, including cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
48,800 |
|
68,800 |
|
||
Cash, including cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
31,300 |
|
$ |
54,000 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The interim consolidated financial statements for the three-month period ended March 31, 2006 should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. (which may be referred to as West, the Company, we, us or our), appearing in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The year-end condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles.
Interim Period Accounting Policy
In the opinion of management, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, contain all adjustments, consisting mainly of normal recurring accruals and adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position as of March 31, 2006, the results of operations and cash flows for the periods ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 and the change in shareholders equity for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year.
Income Taxes
The tax rate used for interim periods is the estimated annual effective consolidated tax rate, based on the current estimate of full year results, except that taxes related to specific events, if any, are recorded in the interim period in which they occur.
In the first quarter of 2006 we recognized a $0.4 million, or $0.01 per diluted share, tax benefit in continuing operations relating to the resolution of a claim for a tax refund associated with the disposition of our former plastic molding facility in Puerto Rico. This benefit is accounted for as a discrete item in the period in which it occurs and is excluded from the annual effective tax rate calculation.
Note 2: Change in Accounting Principle
During the first quarter of 2006, we changed our method of inventory costing from last-in-first-out (LIFO) to first-in-first-out (FIFO) for inventory located in the United States, which accounts for approximately 30% of our total consolidated inventory. The majority (70%) of our inventory had already been accounted for on, primarily, the FIFO method. The change was made to facilitate a comparison of our financial results with those of our principal competitors and customers on such measures as inventory levels and turnover, gross margin, and operating earnings. We also believe that using the FIFO method provides a better matching of expenses and revenues and provides a more consistent inventory costing method within our operating segments, thus, the change in accounting is considered preferable.
FASB Statement 154 Accounting Changes and Error Corrections requires retrospective application of the new accounting principle to all periods presented. The change has been applied retrospectively and the financial statements have been adjusted for all prior periods presented. The change from the LIFO method to the FIFO method had no impact on the results of operations for either period presented. The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2005 has been adjusted to reflect an increase in retained earnings of $6,400, an increase in inventories of $9,900 and an increase in the current deferred income tax liability of $3,500.
Note 3: Debt Extinguishment
On February 27, 2006, we prepaid $100,000 of 6.81% senior notes maturing April 8, 2009. As required by the note purchase agreement, we incurred costs of approximately $5,900 ($0.12 per diluted share) in connection with the prepayment.
8
We financed the prepayment by issuing 81,500 (approximately $100,000) of new senior unsecured notes. 20,400 of the notes have a maturity of 7 years with an interest rate of 4.215% while the remaining 61,100 of the notes have a maturity of 10 years and an interest rate of 4.38%. The lower-interest notes are expected to reduce annual pre-tax financing costs by approximately $2,500. We will account for the Euro-denominated debt as a hedge of our investment in our European operations.
In addition, we have amended the terms of the revolving credit agreement, including an extension of the maturity date to February 2011 and a reduction of the interest rate spreads applicable to amounts borrowed under the agreement.
Note 4: Acquisitions
During 2005, we completed the acquisitions of Medimop Medical Projects, Ltd. and its affiliated company Medimop USA LLC (Medimop), the Tech Group Inc. (TGI) and Monarch Analytical Laboratories, Inc. (Monarch). The following unaudited pro forma summary combines our results with the results of operations of Medimop and TGI as if the acquisitions had occurred at January 1, 2005. The results of operations of Monarch would not have had a material impact on reported sales or net income and have, therefore, been excluded from this summary. These pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and do not purport to be indicative of what would have occurred had the acquisitions been made at the beginning of the period, or of results which may occur in the future.
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
3/31/05 |
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
191,500 |
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
13,100 |
|
Income from continuing operations per diluted share |
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
13,400 |
|
Net income per diluted share |
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
Note 5: Stock-Based Compensation
In the first quarter of 2006, we granted 250,700 stock options and 24,400 stock appreciation rights (SAR) to key employees under the 2004 Stock-Based Compensation Plan. These awards vest in annual quarterly increments over 4 years of continuous service and have 10-year contractual terms. Upon exercise of stock options, shares are issued from treasury stock in exchange for the exercise price of the options. Upon exercise of a SAR, the employee receives cash for the difference between the grant price and the fair market value of the Companys stock on the date of exercise. As a result, SAR awards must be recognized as an other long-term liability. The fair value of each option and SAR award was estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option valuation model that uses the following assumptions: average risk-free interest rate of 4.6%, average expected life of 6 years, estimated volatility based on history of 29.3% and dividend yield of 1.5%. The grant date fair value of options and SARs granted during the three months ended March 31, 2006 was $10.54. The fair value of each SAR is adjusted to reflect changes in assumptions between the date of grant and the end of the period with the resulting change reflected in expense in each period. For both of the three-month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2006, we recorded pretax compensation expense associated with stock option and SAR awards of $500. Total compensation cost related to nonvested option and SAR awards not yet recognized was $5,400 at March 31, 2006 This compensation cost will be recognized over an average weighted life of 2.1 years.
In addition to stock options and SAR awards, we issue performance vesting restricted shares (PVR shares) and performance based share unit awards (PBS units) under the 2004 Stock-Based Compensation Plan. Recipients of PVR shares have the right to receive shares of common stock dependent on the achievement of certain performance targets involving annual growth rates on revenue and return on invested capital for specified performance periods. Recipients of PBS units have the right to receive a payment in cash per unit based on the fair market value of the Companys common stock at the end of the performance period dependent on the achievement of the same performance targets. As a result, PBS units must be recognized as an other long-term liability. During the first quarter of 2006, we awarded 85,700 PVR shares and 8,300 PBS units to key employees covering a three-year performance period ending
9
December 31, 2008. Recipients will receive no shares or units if results for the performance period are less than 70% of the targeted performance. Achievement of between 70% and 100% of the performance targets would result in a vesting of between 50% and 100% of the PVR shares and PBS units. Achievement of between 101% and 150% of the performance targets would result in the award of up to 94,000 additional, unrestricted awards, depending on the level of achievement. The fair value of PVR shares is determined at the grant date fair market value and is recognized as an expense over the vesting period. The fair value of PBS units is determined at the grant date fair market value and then revalued at the end of each quarter for changes in the Companys stock price. During the first quarter of 2005 and 2006, pretax compensation expense for PVR shares and PBS units of $700 and $900, respectively, was recorded. Total compensation cost related to nonvested PVR share and PBS unit awards not yet recognized was $6,700 at March 31, 2006. This compensation cost will be recognized over an average weighted life of 2.1 years.
Note 6: Inventories
Inventories at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 were as follows:
|
|
3/31/06 |
|
12/31/05 |
|
||
Finished goods |
|
$ |
35,400 |
|
$ |
26,300 |
|
Work in process |
|
12,700 |
|
10,300 |
|
||
Raw materials |
|
38,200 |
|
34,500 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
86,300 |
|
$ |
71,100 |
|
Note 7: Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 was as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
3/31/06 |
|
3/31/05 |
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
18,100 |
|
$ |
13,300 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
3,000 |
|
(9,100 |
) |
||
Minimum pension liability translation adjustments, net of tax |
|
|
|
100 |
|
||
Unrealized gains on derivatives, net of tax |
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
||
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
22,300 |
|
$ |
4,300 |
|
Note 8: Segment Information
Net sales and operating profit by reporting segment for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 were as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
Net Sales |
|
3/31/06 |
|
3/31/05 |
|
||
Pharmaceutical Systems |
|
$ |
160,000 |
|
$ |
135,000 |
|
Tech Group |
|
65,700 |
|
16,700 |
|
||
Eliminations |
|
(2,900 |
) |
(2,200 |
) |
||
Consolidated total |
|
$ |
222,800 |
|
$ |
149,500 |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
Operating Profit |
|
3/31/06 |
|
3/31/05 |
|
||
Pharmaceutical Systems |
|
$ |
35,800 |
|
$ |
26,400 |
|
Tech Group |
|
4,900 |
|
1,100 |
|
||
Corporate costs |
|
(10,200 |
) |
(6,100 |
) |
||
Domestic pension expense |
|
(2,300 |
) |
(1,300 |
) |
||
Operating profit |
|
28,200 |
|
20,100 |
|
||
Loss on debt extinguishment |
|
5,900 |
|
|
|
||
Interest expense, net |
|
3,000 |
|
2,000 |
|
||
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
19,300 |
|
$ |
18,100 |
|
10
On August 2, 2005, we acquired a 90% interest in Medimop and on February 11, 2005, we acquired Monarch. The results of the Medimop and Monarch businesses are included within the Pharmaceutical Systems Segment. Medimop contributed $4,500 to net sales and $1,100 to operating profit for the three months ended March 31, 2006. Monarch contributed $1,100 and $400 to net sales and $400 and $200 to operating profit for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
On May 20, 2005, we completed the acquisition of TGI. TGI net sales and operating profit are included in the results under the Tech Group segment for the three-month period ended March 31, 2006. During that period, TGI contributed $47,300 to sales and $2,900 to operating profit.
Note 9: Capital Stock
Common stock issued at March 31, 2006 was 34,330,282 shares, of which 2,028,033 shares were held in treasury. Dividends of $.12 per common share were paid in the first quarter of 2006 and a dividend of $.12 per share payable May 3, 2006 to holders of record on April 19, 2006 was declared on February 28, 2006.
Note 10: Net Income Per Share
Below are the calculations of earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005. Options to purchase 260,249 shares of common stock that were outstanding during the quarter ended March 31, 2006, were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share since the options were antidilutive. There were 245,600 antidilutive options outstanding during the quarter ended March 31, 2005.
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
3/31/06 |
|
3/31/05 |
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
18,100 |
|
$ |
13,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Average common shares outstanding |
|
31,754 |
|
30,645 |
|
||
Add: Dilutive stock options and restricted shares |
|
1,371 |
|
1,130 |
|
||
Average shares assuming dilution |
|
33,125 |
|
31,775 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic net income per share |
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
Diluted net income per share |
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
Note 11: Environmental Compliance
We have accrued the estimated cost of environmental compliance expenses related to soil or ground water contamination at current and former manufacturing facilities. We believe the accrued liability of $1,900 at March 31, 2006 is sufficient to cover the future costs of these remedial actions. Although we cannot be certain, we expect that remediation activities at all facilities will be completed in 2006.
Note 12: Goodwill and Intangibles
Goodwill by reportable segment as of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 was as follows:
|
|
Pharmaceutical
|
|
Tech
|
|
Total |
|
|||
Balance, December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
63,600 |
|
$ |
25,900 |
|
$ |
89,500 |
|
Additions |
|
|
|
300 |
|
300 |
|
|||
Foreign currency translation |
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|||
Balance, March 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
63,700 |
|
$ |
26,200 |
|
$ |
89,900 |
|
11
Intangible assets and accumulated amortization as of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 were as follows:
|
|
3/31/06 |
|
12/31/05 |
|
||||||||
|
|
Cost |
|
Accumulated
|
|
Cost |
|
Accumulated
|
|
||||
Patents |
|
$ |
5,900 |
|
$ |
(1,400 |
) |
$ |
6,000 |
|
$ |
(1,300 |
) |
Trademarks |
|
11,100 |
|
(100 |
) |
11,200 |
|
|
|
||||
Customer relationships |
|
29,100 |
|
(1,300 |
) |
29,200 |
|
(900 |
) |
||||
Customer contracts |
|
22,600 |
|
(900 |
) |
22,600 |
|
(700 |
) |
||||
Non-compete agreements |
|
3,900 |
|
(400 |
) |
3,800 |
|
(200 |
) |
||||
|
|
$ |
72,600 |
|
$ |
(4,100 |
) |
$ |
72,800 |
|
$ |
(3,100 |
) |
The cost basis of intangible assets includes the effects of foreign currency translation adjustments. Amortization expense for the period ended March 31, 2006 was $1,000. Trademarks with a carrying amount of $10,000 were determined to have indefinite lives and therefore do not require amortization.
In addition to the amortization expense recorded for intangible assets, we also record amortization expense for tooling, molds and dies included in other noncurrent assets. For the periods ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, we recorded $200 and $1,100 of amortization expense, respectively.
Note 13: Other Expense
Other expense for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 was as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
3/31/2006 |
|
3/31/2005 |
|
||
Foreign exchange transaction (gains) losses |
|
$ |
(200 |
) |
$ |
400 |
|
Loss on sales of equipment and other assets |
|
400 |
|
100 |
|
||
Other |
|
500 |
|
600 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
700 |
|
$ |
1,100 |
|
Included in the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 was a $500 impairment of an investment in a company that had been developing genomics analysis technology, following that companys unsuccessful efforts in finding a commercial sponsor.
Note 14: Benefit Plans
The components of net pension expense for domestic and international plans for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 were as follows:
|
|
Pension benefits |
|
Other retirement benefits |
|
||||||||
|
|
3/31/06 |
|
3/31/05 |
|
3/31/06 |
|
3/31/05 |
|
||||
Service cost |
|
$ |
1,300 |
|
$ |
1,400 |
|
$ |
300 |
|
$ |
200 |
|
Interest cost |
|
3,300 |
|
3,000 |
|
200 |
|
100 |
|
||||
Expected return on assets |
|
(3,700 |
) |
(3,800 |
) |
|
|
|
|
||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
200 |
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Recognized actuarial losses |
|
1,000 |
|
800 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Pension expense |
|
$ |
2,100 |
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
$ |
500 |
|
$ |
300 |
|
|
|
Pension benefits |
|
Other retirement
|
|
Total |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
3/31/06 |
|
3/31/05 |
|
3/31/06 |
|
3/31/05 |
|
3/31/06 |
|
3/31/05 |
|
||||||
Domestic plans |
|
$ |
1,800 |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
$ |
500 |
|
$ |
300 |
|
$ |
2,300 |
|
$ |
1,300 |
|
International plans |
|
300 |
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
|
500 |
|
||||||
|
|
$ |
2,100 |
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
$ |
500 |
|
$ |
300 |
|
$ |
2,600 |
|
$ |
1,800 |
|
12
Note 15: Legal Proceedings
On February 2, 2006, we settled a lawsuit filed in connection with the January 2003 explosion and related fire at our Kinston, N.C. plant. Our monetary contribution was limited to the balance of our deductibles under applicable insurance policies, all of which has been previously recorded in our financial statements. We continue to be a party, but not a defendant, in a lawsuit brought by injured workers against a number of third-party suppliers to the Kinston plant. We believe exposure in that case should be limited to amounts we and our workers compensation insurance carrier would otherwise be entitled to receive by way of subrogation from the plaintiffs.
By letter dated September 27, 2005, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico notified us that we are potentially responsible for damages to natural resources, including groundwater and soils, resulting from alleged releases of hazardous substances at our former facility at an industrial park in Vega Alta, Puerto Rico. The notice stated that Puerto Rico, assisted by a private attorney, intends to bring suit within 60 days against the Company and other potentially responsible parties (PRPs) pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (CERCLA) and other applicable laws. Other PRPs that were industrial park tenants include Caribe GE International Controls Corp., together with alleged successors General Electric Company and NBC-Rainbow Holdings, Inc., Unisys, Harmon Automotive, Inc., and Motorola Electronica de Puerto Rico, Inc. All parties have executed a series of tolling agreements to continue discussions before litigation, the latest version of which expires on May 15, 2006, unless extended. If the litigation is pursued, however, we intend to vigorously defend such litigation.
Note 16: Discontinued Operations
In April 2006, we were advised that our claim for certain tax benefits associated with the 2001 disposition of our former contract manufacturing and packaging business was confirmed. Accordingly, we are reporting in the first quarter of 2006 the $3.8 million net effect of that resolution as income from discontinued operations.
During 2005, we completed the divestitures of our drug delivery and clinical services businesses, which formerly comprised the Drug Delivery Systems segment. All prior periods have been adjusted to present the results of the former Drug Delivery Systems segment as a discontinued operation.
Net sales and income from discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 were as follows:
|
|
3/31/06 |
|
3/31/05 |
|
||
Net sales |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2,900 |
|
Pretax income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
400 |
|
||
Income tax benefit |
|
3,800 |
|
(100 |
) |
||
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
3,800 |
|
$ |
300 |
|
The income in 2005 primarily reflects the results of the clinical services unit which was sold in August 2005.
Discontinued operations had no impact on cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2006 since the refund from the allowable claims had not been received as of the end of the period.
Note 17: New Accounting Standards
In February 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS 123(R)-4, Classification of Options and Similar Instruments Issued as Employee Compensation That Allow for Cash Settlement upon the Occurrence of a Contingent Event, which amends SFAS No. 123(R) to require that options issued with a cash settlement feature that can be exercised upon the occurrence of a contingent event that is outside the employees control should not be classified as a liability until it becomes probable that the event will occur. For companies that adopted SFAS No. 123(R) prior to the issuance of the FSP, application is required in the first reporting period beginning after the issue date of February 3, 2006. Currently, we have no awards outstanding with contingent cash settlement features, and as a result, the FSP will not have an impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements.
13
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
Managements discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes.
COMPANY OVERVIEW
We are a global pharmaceutical technology company that applies proprietary materials science, formulation research and manufacturing innovation to the quality, therapeutic value, development speed and rapid market availability of pharmaceuticals, biologics, vaccines and consumer products. We have manufacturing locations in North and South America, Europe and Asia, with partners in Mexico and Japan. We have two reportable segments: Pharmaceutical Systems and Tech Group.
Our Pharmaceutical Systems segment focuses on primary packaging components and systems for injectable drug delivery, including stoppers and seals for vials, and closures and disposable components used in syringe, intravenous and blood collection systems. The Pharmaceutical Systems segment has two operating segments that sell a similar range of products, manufactured from elastomer and metal components, in their respective geographic regions: the Americas and Europe/Asia. The Pharmaceutical Systems segment includes the results of Medimop, a company acquired in August 2005 that specializes in reconstitution, mixing and fluid transfer technologies for injectable drugs in vials, bags, ampoules and syringes.
The Tech Group segment was created following the May 2005 acquisition of substantially all of the American and European assets of The Tech Group, Inc. (TGI). This segment is composed of our previously existing Device Group operating unit and the acquired TGI business. As a combined unit, our Tech Group segment is a global leader in plastic injection molding, offering custom contract-manufacturing solutions for the healthcare and consumer industries. Products and projects include the design and manufacture of unique components and assemblies for surgical, ophthalmic, diagnostic and drug delivery systems, such as contact lens storage kits, pill dispensers, safety needle and pen-based injection systems, diagnostic sample containers and components and systems associated with drug inhalation devices. The segment also provides molds and assembles consumer product components, including printer cartridges, resealable closures for juice and dairy products, writing pens and markers, and so-called smart cards, which incorporate electronic read/write capability into plastic cards.
In January 2006, the United States Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) granted marketing approval for Exubera® Inhalation Powder, a pulmonary insulin product developed by our customer Nektar that will be marketed by Pfizer, Inc. Our Tech Group is one of two contract-manufacturers for Nektars inhalation delivery device. Although the product faces significant challenges in gaining acceptance among physicians and diabetic patients, current expectations for the product are positive.
In addition to supporting the targeted mid-year launch of Exubera®, West management will continue to place emphasis on developing innovative drug delivery solutions, achieving production and operational efficiencies and implementing strategies to mitigate the impact of rising material and fuel costs. We continue to evaluate opportunities to expand our production capacity by acquiring or constructing an additional facility in Asia.
Our financial statements include the results of the acquired businesses for periods subsequent to their acquisition date. For the purpose of aiding the comparison of our year-to-year results, reference is made in managements discussion and analysis to results excluding the impact of acquisitions and the effects of changes in foreign exchange rates. Those re-measured period results are not in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and are non-GAAP financial measures. The non-GAAP financial measures are intended to explain or aid in the use of, not as a substitute for, the related GAAP financial measures.
14
NET SALES
The following table summarizes net sales by reportable segment:
Net sales by reportable segment |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
($in millions) |
|
3/31/06 |
|
3/31/05 |
|
||
Pharmaceutical Systems Segment |
|
$ |
160.0 |
|
$ |
135.0 |
|
Tech Group Segment |
|
65.7 |
|
16.7 |
|
||
Intersegment Sales |
|
(2.9 |
) |
(2.2 |
) |
||
Total Net Sales |
|
$ |
222.8 |
|
$ |
149.5 |
|
Consolidated 2006 first quarter net sales were $222.8 million, an increase of $73.3 million (49.1%) above those achieved in the first quarter of 2005. Net sales of businesses acquired during 2005 totaled $52.9 million in 2006 compared to $0.4 million in 2005 and accounted for $52.5 million, or 35.1 percentage points, of the 2006 first quarter sales increase. Our financial statements include the results of acquired businesses for periods subsequent to their acquisition date, and therefore the first quarter 2005 results do not include any results for the TGI or Medimop units as these acquisitions took place later in 2005. Foreign currency translation rates had a $6.5 million, or 4.3 percentage points, unfavorable impact on sales growth. On a like-to-like basis, excluding the impact of acquired businesses and foreign currency rates, consolidated 2006 first quarter net sales were 18.3% favorable to the prior year quarter.
In the Pharmaceutical Systems segment, first quarter 2006 net sales were $25 million or 18.5% favorable to those achieved in the prior year quarter. Incremental sales resulting from acquired businesses contributed $5.2 million or 3.8 percentage points of the total sales increase. 2006 foreign currency translation had a $6.5 million, or 4.8 percentage points, unfavorable impact on the Pharmaceutical Systems segment compared to the 2005 first quarter. Excluding the timing effect of acquisitions and foreign currency rates, first quarter 2006 Pharmaceutical System segment sales were $26.3 million, or 19.5% favorable to the prior year quarter. Price increases accounted for approximately 3 percentage points of the quarter to quarter sales increase, with the remainder attributed to volume increases, most notably in Europe. The increased sales levels were driven by strong demand for pharmaceutical packaging components used in pre-filled syringe systems, serum stoppers and Flip-Off ® seals. Approximately $5.0 million of the 2006 first quarter sales increase is attributed to our customers increased inventory levels in anticipation of new product launches and for a production line change at a customer facility later in the year.
Tech Group segment 2006 first quarter net sales were $49.0 million above those recorded in 2005 with the acquired TGI business accounting for $47.3 million of the increase. The remaining $1.7 million net sales increase is attributed to increases in our previously existing plastic molding operations with $1.1 million associated with increased sales of components used to seal beverage containers, and the remainder principally due to inter-segment sales of plastic components used in the production of Flip-Off ® seals. Tech Group segment first quarter 2006 results include net sales of $3.3 million of a pulmonary drug delivery device for the recently FDA-approved inhalable insulin product Exubera ® inhalation powder, licensed by Pfizer Inc. and developed by our customer, Nektar Inc. First quarter 2006 net sales of healthcare devices, led by component parts for surgical devices and insulin pens, accounted for 52% of total Tech Group segment sales. Net sales of consumer products including non pharmaceutical closures and dispensers and industrial products such as ink jet cartridges contributed 32% of total Tech Group segment first quarter 2006 net sales. Revenues from tooling and development projects accounted for the remaining 16% of Tech Group segment 2006 first quarter net sales.
15
GROSS PROFIT
The following table summarizes our gross profit and related gross margins by reportable segment for the three month periods ending March 31, 2006 and 2005:
Gross profit and gross margin by segment: |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
($ in millions) |
|
3/31/06 |
|
3/31/05 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Pharmaceutical Systems Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Gross Profit |
|
$ |
56.6 |
|
$ |
43.9 |
|
Gross Margin |
|
35.4 |
% |
32.6 |
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Tech Group Segment |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Gross Profit |
|
10.3 |
|
2.5 |
|
||
Gross Margin |
|
15.7 |
% |
14.7 |
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Consolidated Gross Profit |
|
$ |
66.9 |
|
$ |
46.4 |
|
Consolidated Gross Margin |
|
30.0 |
% |
31.1 |
% |
First quarter 2006 consolidated gross profit improved to $66.9 million, a $20.5 million increase over the 2005 first quarter. The timing of the 2005 acquisitions accounts for $9.0 million of the increase in gross profit, $6.8 million of which occurred within the Tech Group segment. Despite higher gross margin levels in both reportable segments, the first quarter 2006 consolidated gross margin declined by 1.1% versus the prior period as the lower margin Tech Group segment now represents a higher proportion of total gross profit following the acquisition of TGI in May 2005.
Within the Pharmaceutical Systems segment, first quarter 2006 gross margins improved to 35.4%, a 2.8 percentage point improvement over that achieved in the first quarter of 2005. Higher sales volumes and related efficiency variances contributed 2.1 percentage points of the Pharmaceutical Systems segment margin increase, while a favorable sales mix led by the proportionately stronger growth in sales of pre-filled syringe components over non-filled syringe components yielded an additional 0.9 percentage point improvement. These favorable gross margin variances were partially offset by a net 0.2 percentage point unfavorable variance resulting from higher raw material prices, utility costs and compensation increases which more than offset related sales price increases.
In the Tech Group segment, gross margins improved by 1.0 percentage point largely due to favorable volume and overhead absorption variances associated with increased demand for custom plastic parts used in juice containers.
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Consolidated selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses were $38.0 million in the first quarter of 2006 and were $12.8 million higher than those recorded in the first quarter of 2005. SG&A costs within the acquired business units accounted for $4.7 million of the increase. The following table reports selling, general and administrative costs by reportable segment including corporate and unallocated costs for the three-month periods ending March 31, 2006 and 2005:
16
Selling, General and Administrative Costs (SG&A): |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
($ in millions) |
|
3/31/06 |
|
3/31/05 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Pharmaceutical Systems SG&A costs |
|
$ |
20.1 |
|
$ |
16.8 |
|
Pharmaceutical Systems SG&A as a % of segment net sales |
|
12.6 |
% |
12.4 |
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Tech Group SG&A costs |
|
5.4 |
|
1.3 |
|
||
Tech Group SG&A as a % of segment net sales |
|
8.2 |
% |
7.8 |
% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Corporate costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
General corporate costs |
|
8.8 |
|
4.6 |
|
||
Restricted stock and share unit awards |
|
0.9 |
|
0.7 |
|
||
Stock options, stock appreciation rights & employee stock purchase plan |
|
0.5 |
|
0.5 |
|
||
U.S. pension plan expense |
|
2.3 |
|
1.3 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total Selling, General & Administrative costs |
|
$ |
38.0 |
|
$ |
25.2 |
|
Total SG&A as a % of total net sales |
|
17.1 |
% |
16.9 |
% |
In the Pharmaceutical Systems segment first quarter 2006 SG&A costs increased by $3.3 million over the prior year first quarter. SG&A costs within the acquired Medimop business accounted for $0.8 million of the increase. The remaining $2.5 million increase consists of higher compensation costs of $1.6 million, increased professional services costs of $0.4 million, increased travel and training costs of $0.3 million and higher international pension costs of $.2 million. The increase in compensation cost includes the impact of additional selling and production support personnel in Europe and an increase in staff associated with the development of reconstitution products.
First quarter 2006 SG&A costs in the Tech Group segment were $4.1 million above first quarter 2005 costs, with the acquired TGI business accounting for $3.9 million of the increase. The remaining increase of $0.2 million is mostly attributed to annual compensation increases.
General corporate SG&A costs include executive officer costs, Board of Directors compensation, legal, compliance, finance and communication expenses. The $4.2 million increase in first quarter 2006 over 2005 general corporate costs is due primarily to a $3.0 million increase in West stock-price indexed deferred compensation program costs for our Board of Directors and a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for executive management. During the first quarter of 2006, Wests stock price increased $9.63 per share; during the first quarter of 2005, West stock price decreased $1.13 per share. The net $10.76 differential on stock price on the approximately 300,000 stock equivalent units outstanding on these plans accounts for the majority of the $3.0 million increase in deferred compensation plan costs. The remaining $1.2 million increase in first quarter 2006 corporate costs consists of $0.5 million in severance costs, a $0.4 million increase in incentive compensation costs and $0.3 million in higher compensation, tax consulting services and travel costs.
U.S. pension plan expenses were $2.3 million and $1.3 million for the three month periods ending March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The increase in U.S. pension costs is primarily due to higher benefit obligations generated by changes in actuarial mortality assumptions. We expect full year 2006 U.S. pension expense to be approximately $9.2 million.
OTHER EXPENSE, NET
The following table presents the components of other expense (income) for the three month periods ending March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Other expense (income): |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
($ in millions) |
|
3/31/06 |
|
3/31/05 |
|
||
Foreign currency transaction (gains) losses |
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
$ |
0.4 |
|
Loss on sales of equipment and other assets |
|
0.4 |
|
0.1 |
|
||
Other |
|
0.5 |
|
0.6 |
|
||
Total Other Expense |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
17
OPERATING PROFIT
Operating profit (loss) by reportable segment, corporate and other unallocated costs were as follows:
Operating profit (loss) by reportable segment: |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
($ in millions) |
|
3/31/06 |
|
3/31/05 |
|
||
Pharmaceutical Systems |
|
$ |
35.8 |
|
$ |
26.4 |
|
Tech Group |
|
4.9 |
|
1.1 |
|
||
Corporate costs |
|
(8.8 |
) |
(4.9 |
) |
||
Restricted stock and share unit awards |
|
(0.9 |
) |
(0.7 |
) |
||
Stock options, stock appreciation rights & employee stock purchase plan |
|
(0.5 |
) |
(0.5 |
) |
||
Domestic pension expense |
|
(2.3 |
) |
(1.3 |
) |
||
Consolidated operating profit |
|
$ |
28.2 |
|
$ |
20.1 |
|
The businesses acquired during 2005 contributed $1.5 million in operating profit to first quarter 2006 Pharmaceutical Systems segment, compared to $0.2 million (reflecting the results of Monarch Laboratories acquired in February 2005) in the first quarter of 2005. In the Tech Group segment, the acquired TGI business generated operating profit of $2.9 million in the first quarter of 2006. No TGI results are included in the 2005 first quarter as TGI was not acquired until May 2005.
LOSS ON DEBT EXTINGUISHMENT
On February 27, 2006 we prepaid $100 million in senior notes carrying a 6.81% interest rate and a maturity date of April 8, 2009. Under the terms of the original note purchase agreement dated April 8, 1999, the prepayment of the notes entitled note holders to a make whole amount of $5.9 million in order to compensate them for interest rate differentials between the 6.81% yield on the notes and current market rates for the remaining term of the note.
The prepayment was financed by issuing 81.5 million (approximately $100 million) of new senior unsecured notes having a weighted average maturity of just over nine years at a weighted average interest rate of 4.34%, before costs. The lower-interest notes are expected to reduce annual pre-tax financing costs by approximately $2.5 million.
INTEREST EXPENSE, NET
First quarter 2006 net interest costs were $1.0 million higher than the same quarter of 2005 due to higher average borrowing levels associated with business acquisitions which occurred in the second and third quarters of 2005. Total debt outstanding was $271.0 million at March 31, 2006 compared to $152.7 million at March 31, 2005.
Interest expense (income) |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
($ in millions) |
|
3/31/06 |
|
3/31/05 |
|
||
Interest expense |
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
Capitalized interest |
|
(0.1 |
) |
(0.2 |
) |
||
Interest income |
|
(0.7 |
) |
(0.4 |
) |
||
Interest expense (net) |
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
18
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
The estimated annual effective tax rate, which is used in the determination of quarterly income tax expense, was 30.3% for the first quarter ended March 31, 2006 compared to 31.6% in the prior year quarter. The decrease in the effective tax rate reflects the change in the expected geographic mix of earnings. The favorable geographic mix of earnings includes the impact of our 2005 acquisitions.
In the first quarter of 2006 we recognized a $0.4 million, or $0.01 per diluted share, tax benefit in continuing operations relating to the resolution of a claim for a tax refund associated with the disposition of our former plastic molding facility in Puerto Rico. This benefit is accounted for as a discrete item in the period in which it occurs and is excluded from the annual effective tax rate calculation.
EQUITY IN NET INCOME OF AFFILIATED COMPANIES
Earnings in net income of affiliated companies were $0.5 million and $0.6 million for the three month periods ended March 31, 2006 and March 31, 2005 respectively. Our first quarter 2006 equity earnings were generated principally through the results of Daikyo Seiko, Ltd., a Japanese company in which we have a 25% ownership interest reflecting an improvement of $0.2 million over the prior year quarter. Results from our 49% owned affiliates in Mexico declined by $0.3 million due to a decline in sales volumes resulting in a break-even performance for Mexico in the current quarter.
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
Our first quarter 2006 net income from continuing operations was $14.3 million, or $0.43 per diluted share compared to $13.0 million, or $0.41 per diluted share, in the first quarter of 2005. Results for the first quarter of 2006 include a $5.9 million loss ($4.1 million, or $0.12 per diluted share, net of tax) associated with the extinguishment of our senior notes and a $0.6 million tax benefit including interest ($0.01 per diluted share) resulting from the resolution of a claim for a refund.
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
On April 11, 2006 we received notice that the Joint Committee on Taxation of the Department of Treasury had approved our claim for tax benefits relating to the 2001 sale of our former contract manufacturing and packaging business. Accordingly, we have adjusted our tax contingency reserves to reflect this favorable change in assessment resulting in the recognition of a $3.8 million tax benefit in discontinued operations.
During 2005, we completed the divestitures of our drug delivery and the clinical services businesses, which formerly comprised the Drug Delivery Systems segment. All prior periods have been restated to present the former Drug Delivery Systems segment as a discontinued operation. Discontinued operations for the first quarter of 2005 contributed net income of $0.3 million primarily reflecting the results of the clinical services unit which was sold in August 2005.
FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Working capital at March 31, 2006 was $129.8 million compared with $118.8 million at December 31, 2005. The ratio of current assets to current liabilities at March 31, 2006 was 2.0 to 1.0. Accounts receivable increased significantly since year end, mostly due to the increase in March 2006 sales levels versus December 2005 sales. The days-sales-outstanding ratio was 45.5 days, consistent with 45.9 days at December 2005. March 31, 2006 inventory levels have increased $15.2 million from December 31, 2005, with $8.5 million associated with increased Tech Group inventories, principally in support of the pending Exubera® product launch. The remaining $6.7 million inventory increase is in support of a sales order backlog that increased to $216.4 million at March 31, 2006 from $182.5 million at December 31, 2005 due to a combination of strong demand for insulin and biotech products, advance orders due to customer lead time concerns and customer inventory builds to support new product launches and provide safety stock ahead of planned plant maintenance procedures later in the year.
19
Cash flows provided by operations were $8.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 compared to $1.7 million in the prior year quarter. Increased operating results for the current quarter were partially offset by higher working capital requirements (accounts receivable and inventories).
2006 first quarter cash flows used in investing activities includes capital spending totaling $11.4 million. Approximately 25% of the first quarter capital spending was invested in new product and expansion activities, with the remainder primarily consisting of our normal equipment replacement and upgrade activity. Capital spending by segment consisted of $6.9 million in Pharmaceutical Systems, $4.4 million in the Tech Group and $0.1 million in corporate projects. We now anticipate full year 2006 capital spending of approximately $80 million, an increase of $12 million above prior expectations as we seek to add needed manufacturing capacity to support the growing demand for our products.
Cash flows used in financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2006 include the prepayment of $100.0 million of 6.81% senior notes due February 27, 2006 as well as the early payment penalty of $5.9 million. We financed the prepayment by issuing 81.5 million of new senior unsecured notes with a USD value of approximately $100.0 million. 20.4 million of the notes have a maturity of 7 years with an interest rate of 4.215% while the remaining 61.1 million of the notes have a maturity of 10 years and an interest rate of 4.38%.
We paid cash dividends totaling $3.8 million ($0.12 per share) during the three-month period ended March 31, 2006 and received $4.2 million in proceeds from employee stock option exercises and employee stock purchase plan contributions which are also included in cash flows from financing activities.
The following table updates our contractual obligations under debt agreements since December 31, 2005, and the effect the obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods. No other material changes to contractual obligations occurred during the first quarter of 2006.
|
|
|
|
Payments Due By Period |
|
|||||||||||
($ in millions) |
|
Less
|
|
1 to 3
|
|
4 to 5
|
|
More than
|
|
Total |
|
|||||
Debt agreements |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
$ |
95.9 |
|
$ |
173.4 |
|
$ |
271.0 |
|
Debt as a percentage of total invested capital at March 31, 2006 was 42.5% compared to 45.0% at December 31, 2005. Debt was $271.0 million at March 31, 2006, versus $281.0 million at December 31, 2005. Total shareholders equity was $361.8 million at March 31, 2006 compared to $339.9 million at December 31, 2005.
We believe that our financial condition, capitalization structure and expected income from operations will be sufficient to meet our future cash requirements.
MARKET RISK
We are exposed to various market risk factors such as fluctuating interest rates and foreign currency rate fluctuations. These risk factors can impact results of operations, cash flows and financial position. From time to time we manage these risks using derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps and forward exchange contracts. Derivatives used by us are highly effective as all of the critical terms of the derivative instruments match the hedged item. Effectiveness is measured on a quarterly basis. In accordance with Company policy, derivative financial instruments are not used for speculation or trading purposes.
As of March 31, 2006 we have two interest-rate swap agreements outstanding which are designed to protect against volatility in variable interest rates payable on a $50.0 million note maturing on July 28, 2012 (Series A Note) and a $25.0 million note maturing July 28, 2015 (Series B Note). The first interest rate swap agreement has a notional amount of $50.0 million and corresponds to the maturity date of the Series A Note and the second interest rate swap agreement has a notional amount $25.0 million and corresponds with the maturity date of the Series B Note. Under each of the swap agreements we will recei ve variable interest rate payments based on three-month LIBOR in return for making quarterly fixed payments. Including the applicable margin, the interest-rate swap agreements effectively fix the interest rates payable
20
on Series A and B notes payable at 5.32% and 5.51%, respectively. At March 31, 2006, the interest rate swap agreements had a fair value of $3.1 million.
We periodically use forward contracts to hedge certain transactions or to neutralize month-end balance sheet exposures on cross currency intercompany loans. We have a number of forward contracts with fair values totaling less than $0.1 million as of March 31, 2006 to purchase various currencies in Europe and Asia. In addition, we have designated our 81.5 million Euro-denominated debt as a hedge of our investment in the net assets of our European operations. A $1.7 million cumulative foreign exchange translation gain on the 81.5 Euro-denominated debt is recorded within accumulated other comprehensive income as of March 31, 2006. We also have a 1.7 billion Yen-denominated note payable which has been designated as a hedge of our investment in a Japanese affiliate. At March 31, 2006, a $0.2 million foreign exchange translation loss on the yen denominated debt is included within accumulated other comprehensive income.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET AGREEMENTS
At March 31, 2006, the Company had no off-balance sheet financing arrangements other than operating leases and unconditional purchase obligations incurred in the ordinary course of business and outstanding letters of credit related to various insurance programs and equipment lease guarantees as noted in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In February 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS 123(R)-4, Classification of Options and Similar Instruments Issued as Employee Compensation That Allow for Cash Settlement upon the Occurrence of a Contingent Event, which amends SFAS No. 123(R) to require that options issued with a cash settlement feature that can be exercised upon the occurrence of a contingent event that is outside the employees control should not be classified as a liability until it becomes probable that the event will occur. For companies that adopted SFAS No. 123(R) prior to the issuance of the FSP, application is required in the first reporting period beginning after the issue date of February 3, 2006. Currently, we have no awards outstanding with contingent cash settlement features, and as a result, the FSP will not have an impact on the condensed consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK.
The information called for by this item is included in the text under the caption Market Risk in Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and should be read in conjunction with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
ITEM 4 . CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company has established disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under SEC Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) that are designed to, among other things, ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Companys periodic reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely basis and that such information is made known to the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
The Companys management, under the supervision and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, and based on such evaluation, has concluded that such disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Changes in Internal Controls
During the period covered by this report, there has been no change to the Companys internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
21
On February 2, 2006, we settled a lawsuit filed in connection with the January 2003 explosion and related fire at our Kinston, N.C. plant. Our monetary contribution was limited to the balance of our deductibles under applicable insurance policies, all of which has been previously recorded in our financial statements. We continue to be a party, but not a defendant, in a lawsuit brought by injured workers against a number of third-party suppliers to the Kinston plant. We believe exposure in that case should be limited to amounts we and our workers compensation insurance carrier would otherwise be entitled to receive by way of subrogation from the plaintiffs.
By letter dated September 27, 2005, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico notified us that we are potentially responsible for damages to natural resources, including groundwater and soils, resulting from alleged releases of hazardous substances at our former facility at an industrial park in Vega Alta, Puerto Rico. The notice stated that Puerto Rico, assisted by a private attorney, intends to bring suit within 60 days against the Company and other potentially responsible parties (PRPs) pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (CERCLA) and other applicable laws. Other PRPs that were industrial park tenants include Caribe GE International Controls Corp., together with alleged successors General Electric Company and NBC-Rainbow Holdings, Inc., Unisys, Harmon Automotive, Inc., and Motorola Electronica de Puerto Rico, Inc. All parties have executed a series of tolling agreements to continue discussions before litigation, the latest version of which expires on May 15, 2006, unless extended. If the litigation is pursued, however, we intend to vigorously defend such litigation.
Our sales and profitability depend to a large extent on the sale of drug products delivered by injection. If the products developed by our customers in the future use another delivery system, our sales and profitability could suffer.
Our business depends to a substantial extent on customers continued sales and development of products that are delivered by injection. Our customers also develop products that use other delivery means, including oral and trans-mucosal. If our customers fail to continue to sell, develop and deploy new injectable products or we are unable to develop new products that assist in the delivery of drugs by alternative methods, our sales and profitability may suffer.
If we are unable to provide comparative value advantages, timely fulfillment of customer orders, or resist pricing pressure, we will have to reduce our prices, which may negatively impact our profit margins.
We compete with several companies across our major product lines. Because of the special nature of these products, competition is based primarily on product design and performance, although total cost is becoming increasingly important as pharmaceutical companies continue with aggressive cost control programs across their entire operations. Competitors often compete on the basis of price. We differentiate ourselves from our competition as a full-service value-added supplier that is able to provide pre-sale compatibility studies and other services and sophisticated post-sale technical support on a global basis. However, we face continued pricing pressure from our customers and competitors. If we are unable to resist or to offset the effects of continued pricing pressure through our value-added services, improved operating efficiencies and reduced expenditures, or if we have to reduce our prices, our sales and profitability may suffer.
22
We have significant indebtedness and debt service payments which could negatively impact our liquidity.
We owe substantial debts and have to commit significant cash flow to debt service requirements. The level of our indebtedness, among other things, could:
make it difficult for us to obtain any necessary future financing for working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements or other purposes;
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to changes in, our business; and
make our financial results and share value more vulnerable in the event of a downturn in our business.
Our ability to meet our debt service obligations and to reduce our total indebtedness depends on the results of our product development efforts, our future operating performance, our ability to generate cash flow from the sale of our products and on general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors affecting our operations. Many of these factors are beyond our control and our future operating performance could be adversely affected by some or all of these factors.
If we incur new indebtedness in the future, the related risks that we now face could intensify. Whether we are able to make required payments on our outstanding indebtedness and to satisfy any other future debt obligations will depend on our future operating performance and our ability to obtain additional debt or equity financing.
We may experience difficulties integrating the recently acquired operations of TGI and Medimop and we may incur costs relating to acquisitions that are not anticipated.
Our success in integrating the newly acquired TGI and Medimop businesses will depend upon our ability to retain key personnel, avoid diversion of managements attention from operational matters, integrate general and administrative services and key information processing systems and, where necessary, re-qualify on customer programs. Integration of the acquired operations may take longer, or be more costly or disruptive to our business, than originally anticipated.
The sellers of these businesses have agreed to indemnify us against certain liabilities connected with the business that may arise in the future. Because these indemnities are limited in scope and time, we may incur liabilities that are not reimbursable under the indemnities.
We are subject to regulation by governments around the world, and if these regulations are not complied with, existing and future operations may be curtailed, and could be subject to liability.
The design, development, manufacturing, marketing and labeling of certain of our products and our customers products that incorporate our products are subject to regulation by governmental authorities in the United States, Europe and other countries, including the FDA and the European Medicines Agency. The regulatory process can result in required modification or withdrawal of existing products and a substantial delay in the introduction of new products. Also, it is possible that regulatory approval may not be obtained for a new product. In addition, our analytical laboratory performs certain contract services for drug manufacturers and is subject to the FDAs current good manufacturing practices regulations. We must also register as a contract laboratory with the FDA and are subject to periodic inspections by the FDA. The
23
Drug Enforcement Administration has licensed our contract analytical laboratories to handle and store controlled substances.
Failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements can result in actions that could adversely affect our business and financial performance.
Our business may be adversely affected by changes in the regulation of drug products and devices.
An effect of the governmental regulation of our customers drug products, devices, and manufacturing processes is that compliance with regulations makes it costly and time consuming for customers to substitute or replace components and devices produced by one supplier with those from another. In general terms, regulation of our customers products that incorporate our components and devices has increased over time. However, if the applicable regulations were to be modified in a way that reduced the cost and time involved for customers to substitute one suppliers components or devices for those made by another, it is likely that the competitive pressure on us would increase and adversely affect our sales and profitability.
Our business may be adversely affected by risks typically encountered in international operations and fluctuations in currency exchange rates.
We conduct business in most of the major pharmaceutical markets in the world. Although the general business process is similar to the domestic business, international operations are exposed to additional risks, including the following: fluctuations in currency exchange rates; transportation delays and interruptions; political and economic instability and disruptions, especially in Latin and South America and Israel; the imposition of duties and tariffs; import and export controls; the risks of divergent business expectations or cultural incompatibility inherent in establishing and maintaining operations in foreign countries; difficulties in staffing and managing multi-national operations; limitations on our ability to enforce legal rights and remedies; and potentially adverse tax consequences.
Any of these events could have an adverse effect on our international operations in the future by reducing the demand for our products, decreasing the prices at which we can sell our products or otherwise have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, we may not be able to operate in compliance with foreign laws and regulations, or comply with applicable customs, currency exchange control regulations, transfer pricing regulations or any other laws or regulations to which we may be subject, in the event that these laws or regulations change.
Raw material prices have a significant impact on our profitability. If raw material prices increase, and we cannot pass those price increases on to our customers, our profitability and financial condition may suffer.
We use three basic categories of raw materials in the manufacture of our products: elastomers (which includes synthetic and natural material), aluminum and plastic. If we are unable to pass along increased raw material prices to our customers, our profitability, and thus our financial condition, may be adversely affected. The cost of these raw materials has a significant impact on our profitability. The prices of many of these raw materials are cyclical and volatile. For example, the prices of certain commodities, particularly petroleum-based raw materials, have rapidly increased in the recent past, increasing the cost of synthetic elastomers and plastic. Supply and demand factors, which are beyond our control, generally affect the price of our raw materials. While we generally attempt to pass along increased raw material prices to our customers in the form of price increases, historically there has been a time delay between increased raw material prices and our ability to increase the prices of our products. Additionally, we may not be able to increase the prices of our products due to pricing pressure and other factors.
24
Disruptions in the supply of key raw materials and difficulties in the supplier qualification process, could adversely impact our operations.
We utilize a supply chain management strategy in our reporting segments, which involves purchasing from integrated suppliers that control their own sources of supply. This strategy has reduced the number of raw material suppliers used by us. In most cases, we purchase raw materials from a single source to assure quality and reduce costs. Due to regulatory control over our production processes, and the cost and time involved in qualifying suppliers, we rely on single source suppliers for many critical raw materials. This strategy increases the risks that our supply lines may be interrupted in the event of a supplier production problem. These risks are managed, where possible, by selecting suppliers with multiple manufacturing sites, rigid quality control systems, surplus inventory levels and other methods of maintaining supply in the case of interruption in production.
However, should one of our suppliers be unable to supply materials needed for our products or should our strategies for managing these risks be unsuccessful, we may be unable to complete the process of qualifying new replacement materials for some programs to be qualified in time to meet future production needs.
Prolonged disruptions in the supply of any of our key raw materials, difficulty completing qualification of new sources of supply, implementing use of replacement materials or new sources of supply could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, financial condition or cash flows.
A loss of key personnel or highly skilled employees could disrupt our operations.
Our executive officers are critical to the management and direction of our businesses. Our future success depends, in large part, on our ability to retain these officers and other capable management personnel. With the exception of our Chief Executive Officer, in general, we do not enter into employment agreements with our executive officers. We have entered into severance agreements with several of our officers that allow those officers to terminate their employment under particular circumstances, such as a change of control affecting our company. Although we believe that we will be able to attract and retain talented personnel and replace key personnel should the need arise, our inability to do so could disrupt the operations of the unit affected or our overall operations. In addition, because of the complex nature of many of our products and programs, we are generally dependent on an educated and highly skilled engineering staff and workforce. Our operations could be disrupted by a shortage of available skilled employees.
25
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
The following table shows information with respect to purchases of our common stock made during the three months ended March 31, 2006 by us or any of our affiliated purchasers as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Exchange Act:
Period |
|
Total number of
|
|
Average price
|
|
Total number of shares
|
|
Maximum number of
|
|
|
January 1, 2006 January 31, 2006 |
|
21,683 |
|
$ |
30.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 1, 2006 February 28, 2006 |
|
46,288 |
|
$ |
31.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2006 March 31, 2006 |
|
115,879 |
|
$ |
32.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
183,850 |
|
$ |
32.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Includes 17,302 shares purchased on behalf of employees enrolled in the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan for Designated Officers (Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2004). Under the plan, Company matching contributions are delivered to the plans investment administrator, who upon receipt of the contributions, purchases shares in the open market and credits the shares to individual plan accounts.
(2) Includes 166,548 shares of common stock acquired from employees who tender already-owned shares to satisfy the exercise price on option exercises as part of the Companys 2004 Stock-Based Compensation Plan.
See Index to Exhibits on pages F-1 and F-2 of this Report.
26
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
WEST PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES, INC. |
||
(Registrant) |
||
|
||
|
||
By: |
/s/ William J. Federici |
|
William J. Federici |
||
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
May 9, 2006
27
Exhibit
|
|
Description |
|
|
|
2 |
|
None. |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation through January 4, 1999 are incorporated by reference from our 1998 10-K report. |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Our Bylaws, as amended through March 6, 2004 are incorporated by reference from our 10-Q report for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Form of stock certificate for common stock is incorporated by reference from our 1998 10-K report. |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Article 5, 6, 8(c) and 9 of our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation are incorporated by reference from our 1998 10-K report. |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
Article I and V of our Bylaws, as amended through March 6, 2004 are incorporated by reference from our 10-Q report for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
Instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt securities of West and its subsidiaries have been omitted.(1) |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
Form of 2006 Bonus and Incentive Share Award, issued pursuant to the 2004 Stock-Based Compensation Plan. |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
Form of 2006 Non-Qualified Stock Option Award, issued pursuant to the 2004 Stock-Based Compensation Plan. |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
Form of 2006 Performance-Vesting Restricted (PVR) Share Award, issued pursuant to the 2004 Stock-Based Compensation Plan. |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
Third Amendment, dated as of February 28, 2006, among West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. (the Company), certain direct and indirect subsidiaries of the Company listed on the signature pages thereto, the several banks and other financial institutions parties to the Credit Agreement (as defined therein), and PNC Bank, National Association, as Agent for the Banks, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, dated March 3, 2006. |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
Multi-Currency Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement, dated as of February 27, 2006, between West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. and The Prudential Insurance Company of America, Prudential Retirement Insurance and Annuity Company, Pruco Life Insurance Company, Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey, American Skandia Life Assurance Corporation and Prudential Investment Management, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, dated March 3, 2006. |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
Summary of 2006 Management Annual Incentive Bonus Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, dated February 17, 2006. |
|
|
|
11. |
|
Non applicable. |
|
|
|
15. |
|
None. |
(1) We agree to furnish to the SEC, upon request, a copy of each instrument with respect to issuances of long-term debt of the Company and its subsidiaries.
F-1
Exhibit
|
|
Description |
18. |
|
Letter regarding change in accounting principle. |
19. |
|
None. |
22. |
|
None. |
23. |
|
Non applicable. |
24. |
|
None. |
31.1 |
|
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2 |
|
Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1 |
|
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.2 |
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
99. |
|
None. |
100. |
|
Non applicable. |
F-2
Exhibit 10.1
March 2, 2006
2006 Bonus and Incentive Share Award For:
«Name»
Grant Date: |
|
February 24, 2006 |
|
Restricted Shares Vesting Date: |
|
February 24, 2010 |
|
Unrestricted Shares Awarded: |
|
«Bonus_Shares» (Bonus Shares) |
|
Restricted Shares Awarded: |
|
«Incentive_Shares» (Incentive Shares) |
|
I am pleased to confirm the award made to you on February 24, 2006 by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of «Bonus_Shares» Bonus Shares and «Incentive_Shares» Incentive Shares of the Companys common stock.
The grant of Incentive Shares awarded to you is subject to four-year cliff-vesting if you retain all of your Bonus Shares during that time. The entire award of Bonus and Incentive Shares are subject to the other terms and conditions specified in the West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. 2004 Stock-Based Compensation Plan. Attached with this award letter are a summary of important Terms and Conditions and a Participant Information Statement. Both documents should be reviewed carefully.
This Award is governed by all of the terms and conditions contained in this award letter and the Plan. In the event of a conflict between this award letter and the Plan, the provisions of the Plan shall control for any and all purposes. If you wish to sell or withdraw any of the shares in your account, you should contact the Companys stock plan administrator, Computershare Trust Company at (732)-491-0437. A Sale or Withdrawal of Shares form is enclosed for your convenience.
Please review the attached documentation carefully. I would be happy to answer any questions about the terms and conditions of your awards.
|
Very truly yours, |
|
|
|
/s/ Richard D. Luzzi |
|
Richard D. Luzzi |
|
Vice President Human Resources |
RDL/rmm
Attachments
Terms
and Conditions for
Employee Bonus and Incentive Stock Awards
1. Bonus Shares are shares of Company stock awarded to you and are considered Bonus Stock under the Companys 2004 Stock-Based Compensation Plan. Incentive Shares are shares of stock that are subject to risk of forfeiture as explained below and are considered Restricted Stock under the Plan.
2. Upon grant, the number of Bonus and Incentive shares shown on the accompanying grant letter will be held in an account on your behalf. Recipients will be permitted to indirectly vote their allocated shares through the plan administrator and to receive dividends and other distributions with respect thereto, except that: dividends on Bonus and Incentive shares will be reinvested in additional shares of stock. If the Incentive Shares are forfeited, recipient shall have no right to receive shares purchased through dividends paid on the restricted shares.
3. All of the Incentive shares will vest 100% on the fourth anniversary of the grant date, subject to the following circumstances:
Event |
|
|
|
Effect on Incentive Shares |
|
|
|
|
Before the vesting date |
|
. |
|
|
||||
. . . recipient sells, assigns, exchanges, pledges, hypothecates or otherwise encumbers any of the Bonus Shares |
|
. . . all of the Incentive Shares are immediately forfeited. |
|
|
||||
, . . . recipient tenders Bonus Shares as full or partial payment of the exercise price of a stock option granted under a Company plan |
|
. . . the Incentive Shares continue to vest according to the original schedule |
|
|
||||
. . . recipient tenders Bonus Shares to satisfy applicable tax withholding requirements as permitted by the Plan |
|
. . . . the Incentive Shares continue to vest according to the original schedule |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Termination of Employment |
|
|
|
|
||||
. . . due to death, disability or retirement under a qualified pension plan maintained by the Company |
|
. . . the following percentage of the Incentive Shares will vest: |
|
|
||||
|
|
(i) 25%, if at least 1
but less than 2 years has elapsed
|
|
|
||||
|
|
(ii) 50%, if at least 2 but less than 3
years has elapsed
|
|
|
||||
|
|
(iii) 75%, if at
least 3 years has elapsed since the Grant
|
|
|
||||
. . . for any reason other than death, disability or retirement |
|
. . . . all of the Incentive Shares are immediately forfeited. |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Change in Control of the Company . . . |
|
. . . all Incentive Shares vest in full as of the date of the change in control. |
|
|
4. This Award granted hereunder is subject to the applicable terms and conditions of the Plan, which are incorporated herein by reference, and in the event of any contradiction, distinction or differences between this award letter and its summary and the terms of the Plan, the terms of the Plan will control.
5. If recipient has elected to defer some or all of the Bonus and Incentive shares under the Companys Deferred Compensation Plan, additional restrictions apply to these shares.
6. The Company may condition delivery of certificates for shares upon the prior receipt from Employee of any undertakings which it may determine are required to assure that the certificates are being issued in compliance with federal and state securities laws.
Exhibit 10.2
CORRECTED VERSION
March 9, 2006
2006 Non-Qualified Stock Option Award for:
This will confirm that on February 24, 2006, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors granted you a non-qualified stock option to buy «Option_Shares» of the Companys common stock at $32.585 per share as outlined below:
Grant Type |
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
Date First Exercisable |
|
Expiration Date |
Non-Qualified |
|
«Option_Shares» |
|
February 24, 2007 |
|
February 24, 2016 |
Attached are the following documents:
1. The Plan Information Statement, which describes the terms and conditions of the Plan, tax consequences of grants and awards under the Plan and other relevant information.
2. An Information Sheet about Computershare, the Companys stock plan administrator. This contains important information about how to exercise your stock options. Review it carefully!
3. Additional information about the terms and conditions of the Award.
This Award is to be governed by all of the terms and conditions contained in this award letter and the Plan. In the event of a conflict between this award letter and the Plan, the provisions of the Plan shall control for any and all purposes.
Please review the attached documentation carefully. I would be happy to answer any questions about the terms and conditions of your awards.
|
|
Very truly yours, |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard D. Luzzi |
|
|
Richard D. Luzzi |
|
|
Vice President Human Resources |
RDL/rmm
Attachments
Terms and Conditions of the Non-Qualified Stock Option Awards
The Company grants to you, as of the Grant Date, the right to purchase (the Option) any or all of the Option Shares at the Exercise Price, on the terms and conditions set forth herein and in the 2004 Stock-Based Compensation Plan (the Plan). The Option granted is a non-qualified stock option.
One-fourth of the Option shall become exercisable on the first anniversary of the Grant Date, and an additional one-fourth of the Option shall become exercisable on each subsequent anniversary until the Option is fully exercisable on the fourth anniversary of the Grant Date.
After becoming exercisable, the Option will remain exercisable until February 24, 2016, (the Expiration Date) when it will expire, including in the case of your Retirement or termination due to Disability prior to the Expiration Date, except as set forth below:
· if you die, the Option will expire on the earlier of the Expiration Date or the one-year anniversary of your date of death; or
· if your employment with the Company terminates for any reason other than Retirement, Disability, death or removal for Cause, the Option will expire on the earlier of the Expiration Date or the 90-day anniversary of the date of such termination; or
· if you are terminated for Cause, the Option will expire on the earlier of the Expiration Date or the commencement of business on the date of your termination date.
You may exercise this Option by following the exercise procedures established from time to time by the Company. In addition, all option exercise transactions by officers of the Company who are subject to Section 16 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 are subject to prior review by and written pre-approval of the Companys General Counsel.
The option price for the Option Shares shall be paid within three days of the date of exercise in (i) cash, or (ii) with the consent of the Compensation Committee (the Committee), in whole or in part, in shares of Common Stock held by you for at least six months and valued at their Fair Market Value (as that term is defined in the Plan) on the date of exercise.
Notwithstanding any provision of this Award to the contrary, if at any time within (i) the term of this Option or (ii) within 3 months following termination of employment or (iii) within 3 months after you exercise any portion of this Option, whichever is the latest, you directly or indirectly engage in conduct deemed to be any activity in competition with any activity of the Company, or inimical, contrary or harmful to, or not in the best interests of, the Company or if you fail to comply with any of the terms and conditions of the Plan or this Award, unless such failure is remedied within ten days after having been notified of such failure, then any and all rights to exercise this Option shall terminate and any option gain realized by you from exercising all or any portion of this Option shall be paid by you to the Company. By accepting this Option, you consent to a deduction from any amounts the Company
owes to you, including amounts owed as wages or other compensation, fringe benefits, or vacation paid, to the extent of the amount owed under this heading. Whether or not the Company elects to make any set-off in whole or in part, if the Company does not recover by means of set-off the full amount you owe, calculated as set forth above, you agree to pay immediately the unpaid balance to the Company.
For purposes of this section, conduct deemed to be harmful to, or not in the best interests of, the Company shall include without limitation:
· conduct related to your employment for which either criminal or civil penalties against you may be sought;
· acquisition of a direct or indirect interest or an option to acquire such an interest in any person or entity engaged in competition with, the Companys business (other than an interest of not more than 5 percent of the outstanding stock of any publicly traded company);
· accepting employment with or serving as a director, officer, employee or consultant of, or furnishing information to, or otherwise facilitating the efforts of, any person or entity engaged in competition with the Companys business;
· soliciting, employing, interfering with, or attempting to entice away from the Company any employee who has been employed by the Company in an executive or supervisory capacity, within one year prior to such solicitation, employment, interference or enticement;
· violation of Company policies, including the Companys insider-trading policy; and
· using for your own or others benefit, or disclosing to others, any confidential or proprietary information of the Company in contravention of any Company policy or agreement.
The Company has the right to require you to remit to the Company an amount sufficient to satisfy any Federal, state or local withholding tax requirements prior to the delivery of any certificate for such shares, or in the discretion of the Committee, the Company may withhold from the shares to be delivered shares sufficient to satisfy all or a portion of such tax withholding requirements.
No Right to Continued Employment
Nothing in this Award gives you the right to continued employment with the Company or interferes in any way with the right of the Company to terminate your employment at any time.
This Award and the option granted hereunder is subject to the applicable terms and conditions of the Plan, which are incorporated herein by reference, and in the event of any contradiction, distinction or differences between this Award and its summary and the terms of the Plan, the terms of the Plan will control. All capitalized terms used herein, not otherwise defined herein, shall have the meanings set forth in the Plan.
Exhibit 10.3
February 28, 2006
2006 Performance-Vesting Restricted (PVR) Share Award
Dear Plan Participant:
This letter confirms the award made to you by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors under the Performance-Vesting Restricted Share Award program. The PVR share program is designed to compensate key executives based on the Companys achievement of corporate performance goals, pay for performance and promote the retention of key employees. The PVR share program emphasizes long-term compensation value and encourages stock retention among the Companys key executives.
Participants in the program can earn shares of West stock based on the Companys return-on-invested capital (ROIC) and revenue growth over the next three-year period (i.e., 2006-2008) as compared to ROIC and revenue growth targets established by the Compensation Committee.
The ROIC Target is: |
|
10% |
The Revenue Growth Target is: |
|
10% |
Your Target Award amount is |
|
«PVRS» shares |
If the Company achieves 100% of the ROIC and Revenue Growth targets, you will receive 100% of your Target Award in shares of West common stock. A higher performance versus the targets could result in a greater number of shares being awarded, and fewer shares will be awarded if Company performance falls short of the targets. Please refer to the attached Long Term Incentive Plan with 2006 Revisions Plan Summary to determine how your award will vest. Also attached is additional information about the terms and conditions of your PVR share award.
This Award shall be governed by all of the terms and conditions contained in this award letter and the West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. 2004 Stock-Based Compensation Plan (the Plan). In the event of a conflict between this award letter and the Plan, the provisions of the Plan shall control for any and all purposes.
I am pleased that you are a participant in this long-term incentive compensation program and trust that your participation will be beneficial to both you and the Company.
Please review the attached documentation carefully.
|
Sincerely, |
|
/s/ Richard D. Luzzi |
|
Richard D. Luzzi |
|
Vice President Human Resources |
RDL/rmm
Attachments
Terms and Conditions of the Performance-Vesting Share Awards
Performance Measures and Performance Period
The primary feature of the Performance-Vesting Restricted (PVR) Share Award program is that the participant receives shares of West common stock contingent upon corporate performance over a designated period of time.
The measures of corporate performance are Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) and Revenue Growth.
a. ROIC means the average of the Companys net operating profit (without regard to taxes) divided by the average outstanding equity plus debt.
b. Revenue Growth means the compound annual growth rate in net sales for the Company.
The performance period of this grant is three years. Details regarding the vesting of your award, including the applicable performance formula targets, for the performance period are shown in the attached Long Term Incentive Plan with 2006 Revisions Plan Summary.
After the end of the performance period, West's performance will be calculated on both measures. The results are then tabulated to determine the actual number of shares, if any, to be awarded.
Target Award and Dividends
Your Target Award is an amount of PVR shares that would be paid to you if the Company hits 100% of the ROIC and Revenue Growth performance targets. Additional PVR shares will be awarded if actual performance exceeds the performance targets, and fewer PVR shares will be awarded if actual performance falls short of the performance targets. No PVR shares will be awarded if actual performance falls below the minimum acceptable level.
During the performance period, your account will be credited with additional PVR shares as if the Target Award was achieved and reinvested in dividends on West common stock. At the end of the performance period, you will receive additional shares of common stock equal to the amount of PVR shares purchased through this dividend-reinvestment feature.
Any shares awarded will be transferred to you in approximately the first quarter of the year following the last day of a performance period.
Delivery of the shares may be deferred in accordance with the deferral feature of the Companys Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan for participants in certain countries as determined by the Committee. Details of the deferral opportunity will be provided to participants in that plan prior to the end of each performance period.
Any shares paid under this program will be considered taxable income and subject to tax pursuant to the laws of the country in which you work/live. For U.S. tax purposes, withholding taxes are due upon delivery of the shares and will be withheld from any payment. Additional information about the U.S. tax consequences of your award are contained in the latest plan information statement.
A Change in Control of the Company (as defined under the West 2004 Stock-Based Compensation Plan) prior to the end of a designated performance period will result in an immediate vesting of the full amount of your Target Award. These shares will be distributed to you as soon as practical after the event.
All unvested PVR shares will be forfeited under the following circumstances:
1. Your employment terminates for any reason prior to the end of the performance period; or
2. If at any time during your employment or within 3 months following termination of your employment, you directly or indirectly engage in activity harmful to, or not in the best interest of, the Company. Such activity includes, without limitation:
· conduct related to your employment for which either criminal or civil penalties against you may be sought;
· acquisition of a direct or indirect interest or an option to acquire such an interest in any person or entity engaged in competition with the Companys business (other than an interest of not more than 5 percent of the outstanding stock of any publicly traded company);
· accepting employment with or serving as a director, officer, employee or consultant of, or furnishing information to, or otherwise facilitating the efforts of, any person or entity engaged in competition with the Companys business;
· soliciting, employing, interfering with, or attempting to entice away from the Company any employee who has been employed by the Company in an executive or supervisory capacity within one year prior to such solicitation, employment, interference or enticement;
· violation of Company policies, including the Companys insider-trading policy; or
· using for your or others, or disclosing to others, any confidential or proprietary information of the Company in contravention of any Company policy or agreement.
Long
Term Incentive Plan
with 2006 Revisions
Plan Summary
Background and Basic Plan Design
The Long Term Incentive Plan is designed to implement a balanced approach to the achievement of multiple long term strategic objectives. Awards in the long term plan are comprised of two forms of equity, Stock Options which vest over time, and Performance Restricted Shares which vest upon achievement of performance goals. Targeted awards will consist of equal value amounts of Stock Options and Performance Restricted Shares. This 50% - 50% mix utilizes Performance Restricted Shares to drive focus on two key long term performance objectives, Revenue Growth and Return on Invested Capital, while Stock Options provide the opportunity to share in the overall long term success of West.
50% of the targeted long term award opportunity will be in Stock Options. The number of options will be determined by dividing the expected value of one option (as determined by the compensation consultant and approved by the Compensation Committee) into 50% of the participants long term award opportunity.
Stock Options. Stock options will have the following terms:
· Stock options are granted at fair market value on the date of grant.
· Vesting will occur over the first 4 years of the grant at the rate of 25% per year.
· Options will have a 10 year exercise period.
· Options are not subject to the performance criteria established for Performance Restricted Shares (described below).
Performance Restricted Shares (PRSs)
50% of the long term award opportunity will be in Performance Restricted Shares. The number of shares will be determined by dividing the value per share of West stock (as determined by the compensation consultant and approved by the Compensation Committee) into 50% of the participants long term award opportunity. The PRSs will vest upon the achievement of two performance goals Revenue Growth and Return on Invested Capital - discussed more fully below.
· Performance restricted shares are a grant of Company stock that is subject to the performance vesting provisions of the Long Term Incentive Plan.
· Vesting of the shares as well as the number of shares that vest is contingent upon meeting the performance criteria established for each of the key long term measures: Compound Annual Revenue Growth and Average Return on Invested Capital.
· Dividends accrue on the restricted shares and will be paid to the participant based on the percentage of shares that vest. Dividends may be settled in cash or in stock at the Compensation Committees discretion.
· The actual value of the shares may either rise or fall during the performance period; however, the number of shares subject to vesting will not change.
To minimize short-term volatility, the basic design of the performance plan is to measure performance over a three year Performance Period. At the end of the three years, performance against the two goals is measured and the vesting of the Performance Restricted Shares awarded at the beginning of that Performance Period is determined. Each year a new three year Performance Period is begun and Performance Restricted Shares are awarded. This means there are three overlapping Performance Periods at any given time the one started three years ago, the one started two years ago, and the one started in the current year. Vesting of the Performance Restricted Shares granted at the beginning of a three year Performance Period occurs at the end of that three year period when the performance is measured. Obviously, performance in any given year contributes to the three year Performance Periods which contain that year. This three year rolling mechanism is designed to smooth out short term fluctuation and therefore reward long term performance.
Note that there will be a phase in period during the first two years. The first Performance Period (PP) will cover only 2004. The measurements will be based on 2004 only and the vesting of one-third of the shares awarded at the beginning of 2004 will be determined from that at the end of 2004. The second PP will consist of 2004 and 2005. The vesting of one-third the shares awarded at the beginning of 2004 will be based on the measurements of 2004 & 2005 and will occur at the end of 2005. The third PP will include 2004, 2005, and 2006. The vesting of the final one-third of the shares awarded at the beginning of 2004 will be determined at the end of 2006. The fourth performance period will include 2005, 2006 and 2007. The vesting of the shares awarded in 2005 will occur at the end of 2007. The fifth performance period will include 2006, 2007 and 2008. The vesting of shares awarded in 2006 will occur at the end of 2008.
Plan Performance Targets, Definitions and Weights
The Plan performance targets are established with the consent of the Compensation Committee of the Board. The Committee retains the authority to change or revise the targets as it deems appropriate. In the event of acquisitions or divestitures the Committee will on a case by case basis determine the necessity to change or revise the performance targets.
1. Revenue Growth. Weight 50%.
1. Definition: The three year Compound Annual Growth Rate in Net Sales.
2. Performance Target for Performance Periods beginning in 2004, which include Performance Periods I, II, and III: 5% Compound Annual Growth Rate.
3. Performance Target for Performance Period IV beginning in 2005: 9.0% Compound Annual Growth Rate (revised).
4. Performance Target for Performance Period V beginning in 2006:10.0% Compound Annual Growth Rate
5. Criteria for Performance Periods
i. Performance Period I: 2004. Measured as the 2004 growth rate in net sales over 2003.
ii. Performance Period II: 2004 and 2005. The average of the 2004 and 2005 growth rates in net sales.
iii. Performance Period III: 2004, 2005 and 2006. The Compound Annual Growth Rate in Net Sales over the 2004, 2005 and 2006 performance period.
iv. Performance Period IV: 2005, 2006 and 2007. The Compound Annual Growth Rate in Net Sales over 2005, 2006 and 2007 performance period.
v. Performance Period V: 2006, 2007 and 2008. The Compound Annual Growth Rate in Net Sales over 2006, 2007 and 2008.
2. Average Return on Invested Capital. Weight 50%.
1. Definition: Net Operating Profit after taxes divided by the average Equity plus Debt for each year, averaged over the three (3) year performance period.
2. Performance Target for Performance Periods beginning in 2004 and 2005: 8.5% Average Return on Invested Capital.
3. Performance Target for Performance Period IV beginning in 2005 : 9.5% Average Return on Capital (revised)
4. Performance Target for Performance Period V beginning in 2006: 10% Compound Annual Growth Rate
5. Criteria for Initial Performance Periods
i. Performance Period I: 2004. The Return on Capital for 2004
ii. Performance Period II: 2004 and 2005. The average of the Returns on Capital for 2004 and 2005.
iii. Performance Period III: 2004, 2005 and 2006. The average of the Returns on Capital over the 2004, 2005 and 2006 Performance Period.
iv. Performance Period IV: 2005, 2006 and 2007. The average of the Returns on Capital over the 2005, 2006 and 2007 Performance Period.
v. Performance Period V: 2006, 2007 and 2008. The average of the Returns on Capital over the 2006, 2007 and 2008 Performance Period
Performance Payout Relationship
For 50% of the shares, targeted levels of performance for Compound Annual Revenue Growth are established for each performance period. A threshold of 70% of target has been established, below which no Performance Restricted Shares will vest. (Vesting means that the ownership restrictions are lifted.) At 70% of target, 50% of the Performance Restricted Shares will vest. At 100% of target, 100% of the Performance Restricted Shares will vest. At 150% of target and above, all Restricted Shares will vest and an additional equal number of shares will be awarded without restrictions at that time.
For the remaining 50% of the shares, targeted levels of performance for Average Return on Invested Capital are established for each performance period. A threshold of 70% of target has been established, below which no Performance Restricted Shares will vest. (Vesting means that the ownership restrictions are lifted.) At 70% of target, 50% of the Performance Restricted Shares will vest. At 100% of target, 100% of the Performance Restricted Shares will vest. At 150% of target and above, all Restricted Shares will vest and an additional equal number of shares will be awarded without restrictions at that time.
Payout for performance between 70%-100% and 100%-150% will be determined by linear interpolation between the appropriate points.
The plan is designed to measure performance over a three year performance period. As the plan is implemented the first two years will cover fewer years. To guard against unintended windfalls, payouts will be capped at 100% for the first performance period ending in 2004, and 150% for the second performance period ending in 2005.
Following are matrices reflecting the approved performance targets and corresponding payout opportunities for Performance Periods III, IV and V.
Long
Term Incentive Plan
Performance Payout Matrix
Performance Period III: 2004, 2005 and 2006
|
|
|
|
Compound Annual Growth Rate Revenue |
|
Average Return on Invested Capital |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Performance Range |
|
|
Performance |
|
Payout |
|
Performance |
|
Payout |
|
|||||||||||||
Maximum: |
|
150 |
% |
7.50 |
% |
200 |
% |
12.75 |
% |
200 |
% |
|||||||||||||
|
|
125 |
% |
6.25 |
% |
150 |
% |
10.63 |
% |
150 |
% |
|||||||||||||
|
|
110 |
% |
5.50 |
% |
120 |
% |
9.35 |
% |
120 |
% |
|||||||||||||
Target: |
|
100 |
% |
5.00 |
% |
100 |
% |
8.50 |
% |
100 |
% |
|||||||||||||
|
|
85 |
% |
4.25 |
% |
75 |
% |
7.23 |
% |
75 |
% |
|||||||||||||
Threshold: |
|
70 |
% |
3.50 |
% |
50 |
% |
5.95 |
% |
50 |
% |
|||||||||||||
Performance Period IV: 2005, 2006 and 2007
|
|
|
|
Compound Annual Growth Rate Revenue |
|
Average Return on Invested Capital |
||||||
|
Performance Range |
|
|
Performance |
|
Payout |
|
Performance |
|
Payout |
||
Maximum: |
|
150% |
|
13.50% |
|
200% |
|
14.25% |
|
200% |
||
|
|
125% |
|
11.25% |
|
150% |
|
11.88% |
|
150% |
||
|
|
110% |
|
9.90% |
|
120% |
|
10.45% |
|
120% |
||
Target: |
|
100% |
|
9.00% |
|
100% |
|
9.50% |
|
100% |
||
|
|
85% |
|
7.65% |
|
75% |
|
8.08% |
|
75% |
||
Threshold: |
|
70% |
|
6.30% |
|
50% |
|
6.65% |
|
50% |
||
Performance Period V: 2006, 2007 and 2008
|
|
|
|
Compound Annual Growth Rate Revenue |
|
Average Return on Invested Capital |
||||||||||
|
Performance Range |
|
|
Performance |
|
Payout |
|
Performance |
|
Payout |
||||||
Maximum: |
|
150% |
|
15.0% |
|
200% |
|
15.0% |
|
200% |
||||||
|
|
125% |
|
12.5% |
|
150% |
|
12.5% |
|
150% |
||||||
|
|
110% |
|
11.0% |
|
120% |
|
11.0% |
|
120% |
||||||
Target: |
|
100% |
|
10.0% |
|
100% |
|
10.0% |
|
100% |
||||||
|
|
85% |
|
8.5% |
|
75% |
|
8.5% |
|
75% |
||||||
Threshold: |
|
70% |
|
6.30% |
|
50% |
|
7.0% |
|
50% |
||||||
Target Award Values
Our outside compensation consultants periodically conduct a comparative study of total compensation levels including long term incentive award values for management positions in companies similar to West Pharmaceutical Services. Using this market data, Target Long Term Award values were set for each management position participating in the Long Term Incentive Plan.
The Compensation Committee may change the percentage or type of equity used to fund the long term awards at its discretion.
Plan administration is subject to the provisions of West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. 2004 Stock-Based Compensation Plan, as approved by the Shareholders on May 4, 2004. Participation in the Long Term Incentive Plan is subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee of the Board. The amount and type of awards under this plan are at the discretion of management subject to Committee approval and are not guaranteed under any circumstances.
Exhibit 18
May 7, 2006
Board of Directors
West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We are providing this letter to you for inclusion as an exhibit to your Form 10-Q filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.
We have been provided a copy of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006. Note 2 therein describes a change in accounting principle from the LIFO method of inventory costing to the FIFO method. It should be understood that the preferability of one acceptable method of accounting over another for inventory costing has not been addressed in any authoritative accounting literature, and in expressing our concurrence below we have relied on managements determination that this change in accounting principle is preferable. Based on our reading of managements stated reasons and justification for this change in accounting principle in the Form 10-Q, and our discussions with management as to their judgment about the relevant business planning factors relating to the change, we concur with management that such change represents, in the Companys circumstances, the adoption of a preferable accounting principle in conformity with FASB 154: Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.
We have not audited any financial statements of the Company as of any date or for any period subsequent to December 31, 2005. Accordingly, our comments are subject to change upon completion of an audit of the financial statements covering the period of the accounting change.
Very truly yours,
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
Exhibit 31.1
I, Donald E. Morel, Jr., Ph.D., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ Donald E. Morel, Jr., Ph.D. |
Donald E Morel, Jr., Ph.D. |
Chairman of the Board |
and Chief Executive Officer |
Date: May 9, 2006
Exhibit 31.2
I, William J.Federici, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ William J.Federici |
William J.Federici |
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Date: May 9, 2006
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald E. Morel, Jr., Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.
/s/ Donald E. Morel, Jr., Ph.D. |
Donald E. Morel, Jr., Ph.D. |
Chairman of the Board |
and Chief Executive Officer |
May 9, 2006
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William, J. Federici, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.
/s/ William J. Federici |
William J. Federici |
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
May 9, 2006