UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-KSB
(Mark One)
x ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
or
o TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Transition Period from to
Commission File No. 001-32919
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.
(Name of small business issuer in its charter)
Delaware |
|
20-3672603 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) |
|
Identification No.) |
8120 Shaffer Parkway |
|
|
Littleton, CO |
|
80127 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
Issuers telephone number including area code: 303-285-9885
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class |
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered |
Common Stock, $0.0001 par value per share |
|
NASDAQ Capital Market |
Class A Warrants |
|
Boston Stock Exchange |
Class B Warrants |
|
|
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Act:
Check whether the issuer is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes x No o
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such report(s), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B contained in this form and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
The issuers revenues for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 were $0.
As of March 15, 2007, the aggregate market value of the issuers common stock held by non-affiliates was $44,506,996, based upon the last reported sale price of the issuers common stock on that date as reported by NASDAQ.
At March 15, 2007, 6,963,760 shares of the registrants Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, were outstanding.
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format: Yes o No x
Document Incorporated By Reference
Part III of this Form 10-KSB is incorporated by reference to the issuers proxy statement for its 2007 annual meeting of shareholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of December 31, 2006.
ASCENT SOLAR
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Form 10-KSB Annual Report
2
Certain statements made in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) regarding the plans and objectives of management for future operations and market trends and expectations. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Some significant risks and uncertainties are as follows:
· Failure to build, implement or operate our 1.5MW production line successfully would aversely impact our business and financial condition.
· Failure to build, implement, or operate our planned 25MW production plant successfully would aversely impact our ability to sell into the terrestrial market and would affect our business and financial condition.
· Many of the applications for which we intend to compete will require further technological development, which we cannot guarantee.
· Our reliance on small business innovative (SBIR) contracts with the government to partially fund our research and development programs could impair our ability to develop and incorporate new technologies into our products and could decrease our revenue.
· We have no contracts for PV products and have recorded no sales of such products; we expect that significant PV product sales will not occur for some time.
· Our products may not gain market acceptance, in which case we would be able to sell our products or achieve profitability.
The forward-looking statements included herein are based on current expectations that involve numerous risks and uncertainties. Our plans and objectives are based, in part, on assumptions involving the continued expansion of our business. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control. Although we believe that our assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could prove inaccurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, particularly in view of our early stage operations, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that our objectives and plans will be achieved. The terms we, our, us, Ascent Solar, or any derivative thereof, as used herein shall mean Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
3
Item 1. Description of Business
Our Company
Ascent Solar is a development stage company that was formed in October 2005 to commercialize certain photovoltaic (PV) technology developed by ITN Energy Systems, Inc. (ITN) for extraterrestrial, terrestrial, and near-space applications. Ascent Solar intends to be the first company to manufacture large, roll format, PV modules in commercial quantities that use a highly efficient thin-film Copper-Indium-Gallium-diSelenide (CIGS) absorbing layer on a flexible high-temperature plastic substrate. We have produced and tested small-scale demonstration samples of our CIGS PV products at the laboratory level, but we have not yet produced any products in commercial quantities, nor have we yet received any revenues from the proposed products that we intend to commercialize as our principal business activity. We are presently applying the majority of the $14 million in net proceeds received from our initial public offering in July 2006 to establish a 500kW/yr per shift (1.5MW) pilot-scale production line. The production line is currently in development and on schedule to begin operations in the first quarter of 2008. Successful performance of the pilot production line should prove out the manufacturing processes, products, and market acceptance to enable us to transition into large full-scale, commercial manufacturing of our CIGS PV products.
When used on space satellites and near-space aircraft, PV devices convert sunlight into the electricity needed to reliably power instruments, communications systems and the like. Currently, most PV devices used for space and near-space applications are rigid, bulky and relatively heavy, posing significant challenges to scientists and designers wishing to minimize volume and weight in order to maximize payload and reduce deployment costs. In addition to these shortcomings, PV devices traditionally used for such applications are expensive to manufacture and require the time-consuming and labor-intensive task of connecting individual solar cells together to create a complete PV module. For terrestrial applications such as residential or commercial buildings, the primary driving market factor is cost. Historically, the market has been, and continues to be, dominated by crystalline silicon technology. Emerging thin film technologies on rigid glass substrates and flexible substrates offer significant cost advantages over silicon and, as a result, these newer technologies are beginning to capture a greater share of the market. Whether thin film or silicon based, rigid photovoltaic modules are very restrictive when it comes to deployment and integration into buildings and systems.
The Ascent Solar thin film technology platform addresses many of the current silicon and thin film limitations by offering a flexible, lightweight PV product suitable for terrestrial, space and near-space applications. By employing a proprietary monolithic integration fabrication process, we intend to manufacture our PV devices on the module level, rather than the cell level, thereby avoiding the time-consuming and cost-additive cell-to-cell interconnect procedures utilized by silicon and other thin film PV device manufacturers. We believe that our choice of substrate materials and proprietary monolithic integration fabrication processes should permit us to achieve cost, volume and weight performance advantages over competitors including terrestrial. As a result, we believe that we will be well-positioned to capture opportunities in markets that require or desire low cost, highly efficient, lightweight and flexible PV power sources. In addition, our thin film, monolithically integrated modules will enable direct integration into building and construction materials and electronics packaging that should enable us to offer greater value and new product formats at the building integrated and electronics integrated system level.
4
Corporate History
ITN, a private company incorporated in 1994, is an incubator dedicated to the development of cutting-edge thin-film, PV, battery and fuel cell technologies. Through its work on research and development contracts for private and government entities, ITN developed proprietary processing and manufacturing know-how applicable to PV products generally, and to CIGS PV products in particular. ITN formed Ascent Solar to commercialize this investment in CIGS PV technologies. In January 2006, ITN assigned to us key CIGS PV technologies and trade secrets and granted to us an exclusive, worldwide license to use certain of ITNs proprietary process, control and design technologies in the production of CIGS PV solar modules for our target markets. Upon receipt of the necessary government approvals in January 2007, ITN subsequently assigned approximately $3.5 million in government funded research and development contracts to Ascent Solar and the key personnel assigned to the contracts also transferred to Ascent Solar. Today, ITN still provides to us, at cost, a variety of administrative services such as facilities management, equipment maintenance, human resources, procurement, information technology services and accounting.
In the last decade, ITN has performed approximately 35 contracts for private and government entities in advanced PV technologies. Government sponsors of these contracts include the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory, the National Science Foundation, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the Missile Defense Agency and NASA. Through its work on these contracts, ITN has developed useful and proprietary processing and manufacturing know-how applicable to PV products generally and CIGS PV products in particular, including the creation and adoption of key intelligent, sensor based control processing technologies and the development of a monolithic integration fabrication process.
We believe that our use of CIGS on a flexible high-temperature plastic substrate will offer the best combination of efficiency and product versatility among competing technologies in our target markets. Furthermore, we believe that our proprietary fabrication processwhich, among other things, incorporates monolithic, cell-to-cell integration techniqueswill allow us to manufacture our planned products with significant cost savings compared with our competitors.
As with any new product, the markets acceptance of our planned products is at this time uncertain. Although system developers are in search of efficient, lightweight, flexible and less-expensive PV products, we will be attempting to introduce a new technology quickly into a field dominated by large, established companies that may be reluctant to quickly adopt our newer technologies over traditional silicon based products.
One significant factor working to our advantage is the anticipated continued growth of the PV industry. The industry has grown at approximately 40% annually since 1999, and a number of industry forecasts have projected continued growth of 43% to 50% per year through 2010. As a result, there is a large undersupply of product in the market to meet current demand. Large silicon producers are experiencing shortages in silicon supply, and there are 2 3 year backlogs in orders. We believe the market is primed to accept new thin film technologies. First Solar, Inc. produces a thin film rigid module on glass and is a prime example of this new trend by offering a slightly less efficient product into the market than silicon, but at significantly lower cost points. First Solar, Inc. has reported costs of $1.42/watt as compared with the reported industry average of $2.50 - $2.75 per watt. Ultimately, we believe costs of $1.00/watt are achievable with the various thin film technology platforms entering the market.
Although we believe our projected lower cost structure will provide an advantage in the commodity-based module market, we also believe our flexible substrate will open up new and potentially higher value
5
markets in Building Integrated PV (BIPV) and Electronics Integrated PV (EIPV) where the majority of our current competitors are unable to compete. The flexibility of our product, both in terms of its physical nature, as well as its freedom from rigid design constraints, allows for photovoltaics to be directly incorporated into products for these industries. In particular, these industries utilize large-volume commodity components, such as roofing shingles, panels, and membranes, for BIPV, and batteries, hard drives, microprocessors for EIPV, and by incorporating our components into these markets will thereby provide us rapid, large volume acceptance compared to our rigid, constrained competitors.
Because we are currently developing our initial production plant and therefore without product, we are focusing our marketing efforts on developing select BIPV and EIPV strategic relationships with customers. We currently have the ability to produce product samples and prototypes in limited quantities to evaluate form, fit, and functional parameters for eventual product applications. Our objective throughout 2007 will be to develop several product platforms through these relationships that will support the production volumes we anticipate in 2008 once our initial production line is operational.
We expect the space satellite market and the near-space market to evolve more gradually than the terrestrial market principally due to the higher degree of product qualifications and flight testing that will be required. Although we believe that our planned products will offer cost and performance advantages over others available on the market, we will first be challenged to find customers willing to use our planned products on their platforms, each of which is likely to have different product requirements. Although we intend to manufacture and package our planned products in such a way that they can easily be integrated in a variety of diverse platforms, we believe the space market is more uncertain than the near-space market in terms of gaining customer confidence and acceptance principally because the near-space high altitude airship platforms do not presently have an alternative. In addition to these challenges, we also need to adopt and undertake quality control processes, procedures and tests to qualify and validate our planned products for use in the harsh environmental conditions of space and near-space. We currently envision that our pathway to market will be through development of small mini-modules for experimental space qualification tests and then actual flight experiments with government customers, followed by full scale flight arrays on operational systems once the technology and arrays have been fully space qualified.
Ascent Solar Business Strategy
Manufacturing
Our overall manufacturing strategy is to incrementally build and expand production capacity by demonstrating manufacturing processes initially in a smaller scale pilot plant and then grow capacity to larger scale once the manufacturing processes and tools prove capable of meeting desired performance metrics. Our current focus is the development and construction of a modest production plant with a planned capacity of 1.5MW per year of annual PV module production. The plant is scheduled for completion in 2007 with operations to commence in the 1 st quarter of 2008.
The 1.5MW plant will be used initially to prove our manufacturing processes and should help us to develop the products, customers, and markets that will support our growth plans to 100MW production levels and beyond. As our production capacity grows through the development of new plants, we envision that the 1.5MW plant will continue to serve as a rapid product prototyping plant.
We currently envision developing and completing the build-out of a 100MW plant by the end of 2009. The exact timing will depend upon a number of factors including our level of confidence based upon the performance demonstrated in our 1.5MW pilot plant, product development, market development and our ability to access capital. Although we ultimately envision a 100MW facility of approximately 250,000 ft², we plan to keep with our incremental approach and expect to install only the first 25MW line initially into the 100MW plant. The entire 250,000 sq. ft. plant would accommodate four 25MW production lines. At this scale, our current cost estimates project that it will require approximately $1.00 of capital for the requisite
6
plant and equipment in order to achieve 1 watt of installed production capacity. We believe that our incremental approach to expansion will allow us to build product confidence with our customers and achieve the financial performance that will enable us to meet our capital needs.
In scaling from the 1.5MW pilot plant to 25MW, we plan to migrate from a twelve inch ( 1 ¤ 3 meter) substrate to a wider substrate. Our goal is to ultimately achieve a substrate width of approximately 1 meter , but it may be necessary to initially increase substrate width in incremental steps beyond twelve inches that are not currently defined. The wider polyimide substrate material is readily available from our current suppliers in these wider widths today. In parallel with the development of the 1.5MW pilot plant, we are investigating the wider CIGS deposition sources, process controls, and equipment challenges that will need to be addressed to accommodate the wider substrates.
Products and Markets
Our overall product and market strategy is focused on leveraging the competitive advantages of our unique thin film and flexible format as much as possible. Generally, the terrestrial market is a commodity market of cell manufacturers and module manufacturers who sell to customers one level up the value chain. Although we believe we can compete effectively in the commodity market with a lower cost alternative than silicon, our preferred approach is to move up the value chain through strategic relationships using our unique product characteristics. We envision relationships involving BIPV or EIPV products or System Integration solutions that directly affect the economics and versatility of PV systems and products deployed in the market. Our goal is to integrate our PV modules within the building materials and products themselves rather than adding the modules to the building or product as an afterthought as typically is the case with silicon and other rigid modules in the market today.
Ascent Solar is currently developing product concepts and is evaluating BIPV and EIPV opportunities. Our objective is to develop several strategic relationships during 2007 in anticipation of product production in 2008.
In addressing the space and near-space markets, we envision that our product offerings will evolve initially out of direct government-funded R&D projects or joint programs that we will work directly with prime space system developers or near-space system developers. Our current government-funded R&D programs and our proposed relationship with Lockheed Martin on the High Altitude Airship (HAA) project are typical examples. It is through these types of projects and relationships that our products can be developed, tested, and deployed.
We are aware of delays associated with the Lockheed Martins HAA project. We have not been advised as to whether we will receive funding pursuant to this project. Initial indications are that the Missile Defense Agency, the Department of Defense agency currently in charge of the HAA project, has not included funding for the project in the Fiscal Year 2008 budget; we have not, however, been told as to whether the project will be shifted to another agency or that our original proposal has been removed from consideration. As a result of the delays, we are currently not planning on receiving funding in 2007 under the Lockheed Martin project. We are, however, continuing to develop the technology platform for HAA and spacecraft applications through several R&D programs funded by the Air Force Research Laboratory and the Missile Defense Agency, including the recent $607,365 increase in funding by the Air Force to our high temperature substrate contract.
Ascents Technical Advantages Over Competitors
Most PV companies employing thin-film techniques in commercial production currently use amorphous silicon (a-Si) or cadmium telluride (CdTe) as an absorbing layer. Instead we have chosen CIGS because it offers inherent performance and physical advantages over the a-Si and CdTe technologies.
7
CIGS displays the highest efficiency of the three thin-film technologies, with a demonstrated cell efficiency of 19.5% by NREL in a terrestrial laboratory environment (compared with 12.9% demonstrated cell efficiency for a-Si under similar conditions). Although we have achieved small area efficiencies over 15% in the laboratory, we anticipate that the non-uniformities associated with large area, high volume manufacturing will initially limit module efficiencies to between 8% and 11%. Unlike CIGS, a-Si exhibits inherent inefficiencies and measurable degradation when exposed to ultraviolet light, including ultraviolet light present in natural sunlight. To mitigate these effects, manufacturers using a-Si are forced to employ steps that add cost and complexity to the manufacturing process. By using CIGS, we avoid these issues. While CdTe has demonstrated efficiencies approaching that of CIGS, CdTe currently requires use of a rigid, transparent substrate, which virtually disqualifies it as a candidate for a multitude of applications in BIPV and EIPV. We believe that our choice of CIGS on flexible substrates therefore will provide us a significant technical advantage over competitors who use the alternative technologies of a-Si and CdTe.
We also believe that we will hold a technical and cost advantage over our competitors through our choice of high-temperature plastic as a substrate material. This flexible plastic is among the lightest materials currently available for PV modules and enables the monolithic integration of cells directly into the material. Stainless steel or other metal substrates are unable to employ monolithic integration techniques and must resort to manufacturing discrete cells that must then be mechanically connected to form a module , which adds significant cost in the process.
Our planned use of a roll-to-roll manufacturing process (which enables us to fabricate our flexible PV modules in large roll formats or continuous operations), together with our use of proprietary monolithic, cell-to-cell integration techniques (which allows us to avoid the time-consuming, weight-additive and labor-intensive step of manually connecting individual solar cells), also should afford us technical and cost advantages over our competitors. Since 1994, ITN has developed proprietary sensor-based controls and intelligent process controls for use in the roll-to-roll production of thin-film CIGS PV modules, and we are now a beneficiary of that expertise.
In sum, the technical and cost advantages that we believe will distinguish us from our competitors include:
· Our use of CIGS, which we believe will offer the highest efficiencies of the three candidate thin-film technologies and which can be deposited on variety of flexible substrates;
· Our use of high-temperature plastic as a substrate material, which not only is flexible, lightweight and versatile for BIPV and EIPV, but also provides us the ability to achieve the challenging specific power and power density requirements for space and near-space programs;
· Our experience with, and ITNs demonstrated ability to implement, roll-to-roll manufacturing in the context of thin-film CIGS PV modules; and
· Our use of proprietary monolithic integration techniques, which eliminates an entire back-end cell-to-cell processing step in the assembly of a PV module, and that should save us time, labor and cost relative to our competitors while also potentially offering measurable performance and weight advantages.
Although we believe that we will hold technical advantages over our competitors in the aspects described above, we still face a number of technical challenges if we are to meet our planned 2008 production deadline with products that satisfy the technical specifications demanded by prospective customers. These challenges are detailed in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
8
Key Competitors
Today approximately 90% of the terrestrial market is served by large silicon cell and silicon module manufacturers. The largest manufacturers include Sharp (Japan), Q-cells (Germany), Kyocera (Japan), BP Solar (USA), and RWE Schott (Germany). In all there are over 20 manufacturers with annual production capacities in excess of 25MW. We anticipate that these market leaders will continue to dominate the market with the silicon-based technology for the next three to five years at which time we envision that thin film manufacturers will begin to capture an increasing market share.
The thin film component of the industry is largely made up of a broad mix of technology platforms at various stages of development and involving approximately 20 companies. The a-Si technology is the dominant platform in the thin film sector due to its long history dating back to the late 1970s. Production capacities across this sector range from 0.5MW up to 75MW. The largest producer of rigid thin film modules is First Solar, Inc. (USA), and, the largest producer of modules is United Solar Ovonic LLC (USA). The thin film sector is growing at an even faster rate than silicon principally driven by First Solar for rigid modules and United Solar Ovonic for flexible modules. The cost and manufacturing advantages over silicon that have been demonstrated by First Solar in 2006 have brought significantly more awareness to the prospects of thin film technology platforms. As a result, we believe that there will be a number of new start-ups and growing competition within the thin film sector.
First Solar manufactures PV modules by depositing thin films onto rigid glass plates and uses monolithic integration techniques similar to ours to form the cells within the thin film layers to create modules. Similar to silicon modules, thin film glass modules are heavy and rigid and comparable to silicon modules in form and function. First Solar primarily serves the commodity markets for PV modules that include large scale, grid connected solar power projects. In 2006, First Solar reported shipments of 50MW.
United Solar Ovonic manufactures thin film flexible cells on metal foil and then individually assembles the cells together into modules. The module integration technique is similar to the way silicon cells are individually assembled together in series and parallel to form an integrated module. Flexible modules have the added benefit of being integrated into building and other materials, something that is not possible with rigid thin film glass modules or silicon modules. In 2006, United Solar reported less than expected shipments that we estimate between 25MW and 50MW.
Competition in the near-space market currently is limited to other flexible thin-film PV device manufacturers, while competition in the space market also includes rigid PV device manufacturers. We believe that our primary competitors in the near-space markets include United Solar Ovonic, a subsidiary of Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. (Uni-Solar), Global Solar Energy, Inc., (GSE), and DayStar Technologies, Inc. (DayStar). Uni-Solar, which employs a-Si technology, is an established participant in terrestrial market for solar power. Despite Uni-Solars commercial success in the terrestrial market, we believe that our flexible CIGS on high-temperature plastic PV modules will prove technically superior in weight and conversion efficiency to Uni-Solars devices when used on operational vehicles in space and near-space applications. First Solar, and other thin film PV manufacturers on rigid glass substrates, are not appropriate for space in that they are too heavy (weight is extremely critical) and far too bulky (excessive stowage volume), both of which can add significant launch costs to the mission.
GSE was established in 1996 as a venture between ITN and Tucson Electric Power Company, which was later acquired by UniSource Energy Corporation. GSE and DayStar are, to our knowledge, the only other companies actively exploring the production of a CIGS-based product on a flexible substrate for the space and near-space markets. Both DayStar and GSEs baseline products use a metal foil substrate for space and HAA applications. Given comparable efficiencies, our CIGS on high-temperature plastic substrate cells will have a higher specific power than a CIGS product on metallic foil due to our choice of lightweight material. Furthermore, CIGS on a metallic foil must be interconnected, either by hand or by
9
automation equipment, resulting in added weight and complexity. Our use of a high-temperature plastic substrate and monolithically interconnected devices avoids these issues.
Intellectual Property
In January 2006, ITN assigned to us its key CIGS PV technologies, including a pending U.S. patent application titled Apparatus and Method of Production of Thin Film Photovoltaic Cell, filed on July 19, 2002 (Serial No. 10/197,813), certain unpublished invention disclosures relating to the design and fabrication of CIGS PV solar cells, and trade secrets relating to proprietary manufacture, process and control steps in the CIGS PV field. ITN also granted to us a perpetual, exclusive, worldwide license to use certain of ITNs proprietary process, control and design technologies that, although non-specific to CIGS PV, we believe will be useful in our production of solar modules for our target markets.
In October 2006, we filed two provisional patent applications with regard to our very large module concepts for BIPV applications that fully exploit the advantages of a monolithically-integrated thin-film PV product by a roll-to-roll process.
In April 2006, we entered into a non-exclusive patent license agreement with Midwest Research Institute (MRI). MRI manages and serves as operating contractor for NREL under a prime contract with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). Pursuant to the prime contract, MRI acquired the rights to license certain inventions developed at NREL. We have acquired a world-wide, non-exclusive commercial license to the following U.S. patents and their foreign counterparts: U.S. Patent Nos. 5,356,839, 5,441,897 and 5,436,204; European Patent No. EP0694209 and European patent application Serial No. 95929367.1 (for the EU, Belgium, France, United Kingdom, Germany and Netherlands); and Japanese Patent Nos. 3130943 and 3258667 and Japanese patent application serial no. 8-508088. The license is effective so long as any claim of the licensed inventions is enforceable. In November 2006, we entered into a non-exclusive license with UD Technology Corporation (UD). UD is a non-profit corporation which holds intellectual property created at the University of Delawares Institute of Energy Conversion (IEC). We have acquired a world-wide, non-exclusive commercial license to the following patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 6,310,281, 6,372,538, 6,537,845 and 6,562,405, as well as U.S. patent application Serial No. 60/620,352. These patents and patent applications relate to the fabrication of CIGS on flexible plastic substrates, the use of laser patterning and thin-film deposition during the fabrication of flexible monolithically-integrated CIGS PV devices and certain process steps that we intend to use during the manufacturing process.
Employees
As of March 15, 2007, we had 18 full-time employees and one part-time employee, including five executive officers, nine scientists and engineers, two process technicians, and two marketing and accounting personnel. The number of employees should grow significantly as we install manufacturing capacity. Once the production line has been installed, we intend to hire technicians, product technical engineers and quality control engineers to staff the facility.
ITN provides us with general and administrative support services, at cost, such as human resources, facility management, information technology support and payroll processing. This should permit us to avoid the cost of hiring individual employees and related infrastructure expenses in the near-term.
During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, we expended approximately $319,085 and $0 in research and development activities, respectively. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2005
10
and 2004, ITN incurred approximately $3,100,000 and $3,300,000, respectively, related to PV research and development activities.
Item 2. Description of Property
Our facilities are located in Littleton, Colorado. As of January 1, 2007, we increased our sublease to include approximately 14,200 square feet of office and manufacturing space at cost from ITN, which occupies space adjacent to ours. The sublease expires in June 2010. In 2007, we will pay $17,211 per month of rent through June 30, 2007 and $18,991 per month thereafter, plus pass-through expenses such as taxes, insurance, water and utilities.
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
11
Item 5. Market for Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Small Business Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information
Our Common Stock is traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol ASTI and on the Boston Stock Exchange under the symbol AKC. The following table sets forth the high and low sales price information per share for our Common Stock since its initial public offering in July 2006.
|
|
Trade Price |
|
||||||
Quarters Ended: |
|
|
|
High |
|
Low |
|
||
September 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
3.50 |
|
$ |
2.01 |
|
||
December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
3.95 |
|
$ |
2.09 |
|
||
Holders
As of March 15, 2007, the number of record holders of Common Stock was 62, and there were no holders of Preferred Stock. The vast majority of our publicly-traded shares are held in street name, and we believe that the number of beneficial owners of our stock is approximately 1,300 as of March 15, 2007.
Dividends
The holders of Common Stock are entitled to receive such dividends as may be declared by our Board of Directors. During the years ended 2006 and 2005, we did not pay any dividends, and the Company does not expect to declare or pay any dividends in the foreseeable future. Payment of future dividends will be within the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on, among other factors, retained earnings, capital requirements, and the operating and financial condition of Ascent Solar.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table summarizes as of December 31, 2006 (i) the options granted under our 2005 stock option plan and (ii) all other securities subject to contracts, options, warrants and rights or authorized for future issuance outside the plan.
|
|
Equity Compensation Plan Table |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Number of securities to
|
|
Weighted-average
|
|
Number of securities
|
|
|||||||
|
|
(a) |
|
(b) |
|
(c) |
|
|||||||
Equity Compensation Plans Approved By Security Holders (the 2005 Stock Option Plan) |
|
|
637,800 |
|
|
|
$ |
1.83 |
|
|
|
81,000 |
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved By Security Holders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
637,800 |
|
|
|
$ |
1.83 |
|
|
|
81,000 |
|
|
12
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
In the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, we issued 31,200 shares of Common Stock upon exercise of stock options by its employees, directors, consultants and other service providers. The options were granted pursuant to our 2005 Stock Option Plan pursuant to exemptions available under Rule 701. The exercise price of the options exercised was $0.10 per share.
Use of Proceeds
Our initial public offering of units, each unit consisting of one share of common stock, $0.0001 par value, one Class A redeemable public warrant and two Class B non-redeemable public warrants, was effected through a Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (File No. 333-131216) that was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 10, 2006. The Registration Statement covered the offer and sale of 3,000,000 units for an aggregate offering price of $16,500,000. Our initial public offering resulted in aggregate net proceeds to us of approximately $14 million, net of underwriting discounts, commissions and offering expenses. As of December 31, 2006, we had applied the net proceeds from the initial public offering as follows:
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Design, building and testing of production line and other non-recurring engineering costs |
|
$ |
902,000 |
|
Repayment of bridge loans |
|
1,681,000 |
|
|
Business development and product qualifications |
|
582,000 |
|
|
Research and technology development |
|
196,000 |
|
|
General corporate purposes, net of interest income |
|
344,000 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
3,705,000 |
|
The balance of the proceeds was invested in insured, interest-bearing accounts or short-term investment-grade securities as of December 31, 2006.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Small Business Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
None.
13
Item 6. Managements Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes to those financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-KSB. This discussion and analysis contains statements of a forward-looking nature relating to future events or our future financial performance. As a result of many factors, such as those set forth under Forward Looking Statements and elsewhere in this Form 10-KSB, our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.
Ascent Solar is a development stage company that was formed in October 2005 to commercialize certain photovoltaic PV technology developed by ITN for extraterrestrial, terrestrial, and near-space applications. Ascent Solar intends to be the first company to manufacture large, monolithically integrated roll format PV modules in commercial quantities that use a highly efficient thin-film Copper-Indium-Gallium-diSelenide CIGS absorbing layer on a flexible high-temperature plastic substrate. We have produced and tested small-scale demonstration samples of our CIGS PV products at the laboratory level, but we have not yet produced any products in commercial quantities nor have we yet received any revenues from the proposed products that we intend to commercialize as our principal business activity. We are presently applying the majority of the $14 million in net proceeds received from an IPO in July 2006 to establish a 500kW/yr per shift (1.5MW) pilot-scale production line. The production line is currently in development and on schedule to begin operations in the first quarter of 2008. Performance on the pilot production line will prove out the manufacturing processes, products, and market acceptance to enable us to transition into large full-scale, commercial manufacturing of our CIGS PV products.
Since our IPO in July 2006, management has principally focused on the following two main areas that are critical to our success:
1. Successful development of our initial 1.5MW production facility; and
2. Management of capital expenditures and infusion of new capital.
The majority of the net proceeds from the IPO, or approximately $10 million, are expected to be expended on the capital equipment that will make up the 1.5MW production facility. Managing this capital investment and maintaining the 2007 schedule for completing the production facility represent the companys most significant financial and operational risks. In order to manage our financial exposure, the company has entered into strategic relationships with established equipment manufacturers, and the company has placed firm-fixed-price purchase orders for delivery, installation, and check-out of all the major processing equipment. The modifications to the building to accommodate the new equipment are scheduled for completion in June 2007, and the processing equipment is scheduled for delivery beginning in August 2007 with the final delivery scheduled for November 2007. A critical piece of equipment will be the CIGS deposition and source box that is internal to the CIGS deposition system and is used to deliver the CIGS materials in the proper quantities and at the desired rates onto the moving web substrate. Ascent Solar and ITN are jointly developing this element, and by doing so, the company is able to retain its intellectual property and trade secrets regarding CIGS deposition and intelligent processing. However, as an in-house development, we are unable to fix the costs as we have with our external equipment suppliers and currently estimate that the cost of this element will be approximately $1.5 million.
14
In order to effect a quick transition from development to manufacturing once the production facility is completed, the company initiated a rapid prototyping capability in 2007 to emulate the eventual manufacturing processes, material flow, and statistical process controls. The prototyping efforts are utilizing our existing six-inch wide roll-to-roll development equipment in the laboratory to optimize our manufacturing processes in advance of commencing full scale production on the 1.5MW line. We anticipate that this effort should help to identify potential problems areas early in order to accelerate the ramp-up of production once the 1.5MW equipment is in place. The preliminary results of the prototyping activities which were only begun in February 2007 are encouraging, although there is clearly optimization that is needed to achieve the desired consistency of the thin-film properties, manufacturing processes and performance. We are initially prototyping small, monolithically integrated mini-modules, and we are currently concentrating on repeatability issues and optimization of all processes including the molybdenum processes, CIGS compositions, transparent conducting oxide, and laser patterning methods in order to consistently produce 8% to 9% efficient mini-modules and baseline the end-to-end manufacturing processes with full documentation by the 4 th quarter of 2007.
Although product development will not begin in earnest until we can produce ample amounts of material on the 1.5MW line, we have begun some initial product prototyping for evaluation and test in order to develop a select customer base in 2007 with the intent of beginning product manufacturing in 2008. Although the performance is not yet optimized, the prototyping activities have produced monolithically integrated mini-module product samples for both terrestrial and extraterrestrial customer applications.
In January 2007, the company transferred approximately $3.5 million in government-funded research and development contracts from ITN to Ascent Solar including the transfer of key personnel. The contracts represent a current backlog of approximately $1.6 million, and we anticipate that we will be able to sustain on average between $1 million and $3 million of externally funded research and development.
In the last quarter of 2006, our quarterly operational burn rate was approximately $900,000 with an additional $370,000 expended in capital for our manufacturing line. As of December 31, 2006, our cash position was approximately $10.7 million on hand; however, most of this cash is committed toward progress payments to our equipment suppliers and to maintain the development schedule and ensure delivery of our production tools in the third and fourth quarters of 2007. In order to more effectively manage our projected needs in 2007 and 2008, we completed a private placement of securities with Norsk Hydro Produksjon AS (Norsk Hydro) in March 2007. Norsk Hydro is a subsidiary of Norsk Hydro ASA, one of the worlds leading suppliers of energy and aluminum, with approximately 33,000 employees in nearly 40 countries. Norsk Hydro purchased 1,600,000 shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $9,236,000. We expect that this infusion of capital, together with our other resources, will be sufficient to sustain our operations through 2007 and 2008. In connection with the private placement, Norsk Hydro was granted options to purchase additional shares and warrants, which it may exercise if and after shareholder approval is obtained. Norsk Hyrdo is a leading supplier of BIPV products, and its investment in the company sets the stage for a strategic relationship to develop integrated building solutions.
In March 2007, we received approximately $1.2 million as a result of the exercise of approximately 184,000 Class A warrants at $6.60 per warrant. If our stock continues to trade above $6.60 per share, we anticipate additional Class A warrants will be exercised.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of our financial statements will require us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the related disclosures. A summary of accounting policies that have been applied to the financial statements presented can be found
15
in the notes thereto. We consider certain of these accounting policies to be critical as they are both important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require judgments on the part of management about matters that are uncertain. We have identified the following accounting policies that are important to the presentation of the financial information:
Basis of Presentation: The Companys activities to date have substantially consisted of raising capital and research and development. Accordingly, the company is considered to be in the development stage, as defined in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 7 (SFAS No. 7), Accounting and Reporting by Development Stage Enterprises.
Short-Term Investments: The Companys short-term investments, which are classified as available-for-sale securities, are invested in high-grade variable rate demand notes, which have a final maturity date of up to 30 years but whose interest rate is reset at varying intervals typically between 1 and 7 days. Variable rate demand notes can be readily liquidated at any interest rate reset date, either by putting them back to the original issuer or by putting them to a third-party remarketer as generally provided in the original prospectus. To date, the Company has always been able to redeem its holdings of these securities in accordance with their terms, and the Company believes that the risk of non-redemption is minimal. Consequently, these securities are available for use to support the current cash needs of our operations, and in accordance with Accounting Research Bulletin 43, they are classified as short-term investments.
Cash Equivalents: The Company considers all highly liquid debt securities purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Revenue Recognition: Revenue from cost-type contracts is recognized as costs are incurred on the basis of direct costs plus allowable indirect costs and an allocable portion of the fixed fee. Revenue from fixed price-type contracts is recognized under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting, with costs and estimated profits included in contract revenue as work is performed. If actual and estimated costs to complete a contract indicate a loss, provision is made currently for the loss anticipated on the contract. Revenue from time and materials contracts is recognized as costs are incurred at amounts represented by the agreed-upon billing amounts.
Patents: To the extent the Company obtains or is awarded patents, patent costs will be amortized on a straight line basis over the legal life, or, over their estimated useful lives, whichever is shorter.
Deferred Financing Costs: Costs incurred in connection with obtaining debt are capitalized as deferred financing costs and are amortized to interest expense over the life of the related debt.
Deferred Offering Costs: The Company capitalizes costs associated with the issuance of stock as they are incurred. Upon issuance of the stock, such issue costs are treated as a reduction of the offering proceeds and accordingly charged to additional paid in capital.
Property and Equipment: Property and equipment are recorded at the original cost to the Company. Assets are being depreciated over estimated useful lives of one to seven years using the straight-line method.
Income Taxes: Current income tax expense is the amount of income taxes expected to be payable for the current year. Deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year end based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable earnings. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount more likely than not to be related.
Risks and uncertainties: The Companys operations are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including those associated with: the ability to meet obligations; continuing losses; fluctuation in operating results; funding expansions; strategic alliances; financing arrangement terms that may restrict operations;
16
regulatory issues; and competition. Additionally, U.S. government contracts may be terminated prior to completion of full funding by the U.S. government.
Use of estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net loss per common share: Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, Earnings Per Share, provides for the calculation of Basic and Diluted earnings per share. A Basic earnings per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential of securities that could share in the earnings of the Company, similar to fully diluted earnings per share.
Research and development costs: Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
Recent accounting pronouncements: In February 2006, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments (SFAS 155), which amends SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities . SFAS 155 simplifies the accounting for certain derivatives embedded in other financial instruments by allowing them to be accounted for as a whole if the holder elects to account for the whole instrument on a fair value basis. The statement also clarifies and amends certain other provisions of SFAS No. 133 and SFAS No. 140. SFAS 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired, issued, or subject to a remeasurement event occurring in fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS 155 to have an impact on our results of operations or financial condition.
In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assetsan amendment to FASB Statement No. 140 (SFAS 156). SFAS 156 requires that all separately recognized servicing rights be initially measured at fair value, if practicable. In addition, this statement permits an entity to choose between two measurement methods (amortization method or fair value measurement method) for each class of separately recognized servicing assets and liabilities. This new accounting standard is effective January 1, 2007. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS 156 to have an impact on our results of operations or financial condition.
In June 2006, the FASB ratified the consensus reached by the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) on EITF Issue No. 05-01, Accounting for the Conversion of an Instrument That Becomes Convertible Upon the Issuers Exercise of a Call Option (EITF 05-01). The EITF consensus applies to the issuance of equity securities to settle a debt instrument that was not otherwise currently convertible but became convertible upon the issuers exercise of call option when the issuance of equity securities is pursuant to the instruments original conversion terms. The adoption of EITF 05-01 is not expected to have an impact on our results of operations or financial condition.
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes . FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 also prescribes a recognition and threshold and measurement standard for the financial statement recognition and measurement of an income tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. In addition, FIN 48 provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The Company presently recognizes income tax positions based on managements estimate of whether it is reasonably possible that a liability has been incurred for unrecognized income tax benefits by applying FASB Statement No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies. The
17
provisions of FIN 48 will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2007 and are to be applied to all tax positions upon initial application of this standard. Only tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold at the effective date may be recognized or continue to be recognized upon adoption. The cumulative effect of applying the provisions of FIN 48 will be reported as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings for the fiscal year of adoption. The Company believes that the opening balance of retained earnings will not be affected due to the adoption of FIN 48.
In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157). SFAS No. 157 provides enhanced guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 157 clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing the assets or liabilities and establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. SFAS No. 157 applies whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 157 on our results of operations and financial condition.
In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans (SFAS No. 158). SFAS No. 158 requires an employer to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit pension plan and other postretirement plans as an asset or liability on its balance sheet and recognize changes in its funded status in the year in which the change occurs through accumulated other nonnowner changes in equity. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS 158 to have an impact on our results of operations or financial condition.
In February 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS 159). SFAS 159 allows the company to choose to measure many financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Therefore, the Company is required to adopt SFAS 159 by the first quarter of 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the requirements of SFAS 159 and the potential impact on the Companys financial statements.
We have reviewed all other recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting pronouncements and do not believe any such pronouncements will have a material impact on our financial statements.
The Companys activities to date have substantially consisted of raising capital, research and manufacturing development. The Companys total general & administrative expenses can be summarized as follows:
|
|
For the Year
|
|
For the Period
|
|
||||||
Business development & product qualification |
|
|
$ |
859,164 |
|
|
|
$ |
54,291 |
|
|
Manufacturing development |
|
|
676,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
General corporate purposes |
|
|
1,520,439 |
|
|
|
1,150,203 |
|
|
||
General & administrative expenses |
|
|
$ |
3,056,219 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,204,494 |
|
|
Business development and product qualification costs for the year ended December 31, 2006 and for the period from inception (October 18, 2005) through December 31, 2005 are associated with efforts related to identifying and bidding on government contracts, identifying and developing commercial customers and strategic partnerships and investor relations activity. If the government contracts or
18
commercial customer partnerships are successful, these activities will be utilized to help further define our product for space and near space applications and the terrestrial market. Manufacturing development costs for the year ended December 31, 2006 consist of coordinating with equipment manufacturers and equipment component suppliers in order to provide the manufacturing equipment required for our plant. Additional manufacturing development costs consist of coordinating design requirements and prototype activity for the manufacturing equipment. General corporate purpose expenses relate to facility costs and administrative support costs along with other normal operating expenses. Included in general corporate purpose costs is a non-cash transaction for stock-based compensation related to the issuance of the Companys stock and stock options at fair value. Stock-based compensation for the year ended December 31, 2006 and for the period from inception (October 18, 2005) through December 31, 2005 was $348,944 and $959,124, respectively.
Research and technology development costs for the year ended December 31, 2006 and for the period from inception (October 18, 2005) through December 31, 2005 consist of activities related to process and product development of our thin film PV technology.
|
|
For the Year
|
|
For the Period
|
|
||||||
Research and technology development |
|
|
$ |
319,085 |
|
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
Other income (expense) for the year ended December 31, 2006 and for the period from inception (October 18, 2005) through December 31, 2005 consists of interest expense on financing activities and interest income of $275,083 from investment of our IPO proceeds. The Companys interest expense is comprised of the following:
|
|
For the Year
|
|
For the Period
|
|
||||||
Interest Expense-Note |
|
|
$ |
1,445 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,740 |
|
|
Interest Expense-Bridge Loan |
|
|
80,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest Expense-Bridge Loan Rights |
|
|
800,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest Expense-Financing Costs |
|
|
198,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Other Income/Expense (Interest-Expense) |
|
|
$ |
1,080,691 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,740 |
|
|
Interest Expense-Note for the year ended December 31, 2006 and for the period from inception (October 18, 2005) through December 31, 2005 consists of interest expense on the $200,000 short term note from Paulson Investment Company, Inc. This note was paid in full on February 1, 2006. Interest Expense-Bridge Loan is the 10% interest computed on the $1,600,000 Bridge Loan completed on January 18, 2006. The Bridge Loan principal and interest was paid in full in July 2006 upon the closing of our IPO. Interest Expense-Bridge Loan Rights of $800,000 represents the value of the bridge rights issued to Bridge Loan lenders. Interest Expense-Financing Costs represents direct costs associated with obtaining the Bridge Loan financing, including $160,000 in commissions to Paulson. The Bridge Loan repayment and issuance of the Bridge Rights were made to the investors in July 2006 after the closing of the IPO.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Since inception, we have funded our operations from Bridge Loan proceeds of $1,600,000 and the initial capital contribution of approximately $39,000 from our founders. On July 10, 2006, the SEC declared effective the Companys Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (Reg. No. 333-131216), and we
19
completed our IPO of 3,000,000 units on July 14, 2006. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock, one redeemable Class A public warrant and two non-redeemable Class B public warrants. The managing underwriter of our IPO was Paulson Investment Company, Inc. The IPO price was $5.50 per unit. The gross proceeds of the offering were $16,500,000. Our net proceeds from the offering, after deducting the underwriters discount of $1,097,250 and other fees and expenses, aggregated approximately $14,000,000.
We are currently incurring approximately $350,000 a month in operational expenses for pre-manufacturing activities, research and technology development, business development and general corporate expenses. The $350,000 monthly operational expense is net of projected research and development revenues from our government contracts of approximately $100,000 and interest income of approximately $40,000 a month. These monthly operational costs are higher than previously anticipated due to the acceleration of our plans to scale up manufacturing for the broader terrestrial market opportunities and include: (i) the development and production of product prototypes utilizing existing research and development process tools which should allow us to solidify process techniques and qualify product performance in advance of the build out of the manufacturing production line; and (ii) the incurring of additional costs for investor relations, business development and marketing communications support to strengthen our investor relations, support for our anticipated government program activities, and support for implementing our terrestrial market strategies. We anticipate that this level of operational expenditures will continue through the remainder of 2007.
We currently do not have manufacturing capabilities or other means to generate revenues or cash. The net proceeds from the IPO and the Norsk Hydro private placement of March 2007 are being used to build our operational infrastructure and to develop the manufacturing capacity necessary to produce PV products for sale into our target markets. We expect to acquire the remainder of our required capital equipment in 2007 (a calendar of our projected capital outlays appears below). With our 2007 expected capital expenditure requirement of approximately $9.6 million and an additional $350,000 in monthly operational costs, we anticipate that the IPO funds, the $9.3 million in proceeds recently received from the Norsk Hydro private placement, and proceeds from the conversion of Class A warrants (which through March 27, totaled $1.2 million), will be sufficient to cover our operational expenditures through 2008. Even after we begin production, it is unlikely that our initial sales revenue will be sufficient to immediately support all of our operations and cash requirements.
Our principal business will be to manufacture and sell CIGS PV modules into the terrestrial, extraterrestrial space and near-space markets. We plan to begin with initial development of higher value building integrated and electronics integrated terrestrial market opportunities while continuing our development of space and near-space applications. To realize this objective, we intend to use the majority of the net proceeds from the offering to construct a 500 kW per shift (1.5MW) annual capacity production line to fabricate rolls and sheets of thin-film PV modules suitable for these markets and applications. The cost for this production line consists of the design, building, and testing of our production line, including related non-recurring engineering costs, according to the following development calendar.
20
The capital outlays shown in this calendar represent estimated and actual costs in connection with our production line.
Stage of Development |
|
|
|
Completion
|
|
Estimated
|
|
Actual
|
|
||||
Completion of engineering specifications |
|
3 rd QTR 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
220,000 |
|
|||
Facility and equipment construction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Progress payments |
|
4 th QTR 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
370,000 |
|
|||
Progress payments |
|
1 st QTR 2007 |
|
|
$ |
2,600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|||
Progress payments |
|
2 nd QTR 2007 |
|
|
$ |
2,400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|||
Progress payments |
|
3 rd QTR 2007 |
|
|
$ |
3,400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|||
Final payments |
|
4 th QTR 2007 |
|
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|||
Plant commissioning |
|
4 th QTR 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Production readiness, qualification |
|
1 st QTR 2008 |
|
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|||
Commencement of production |
|
2 nd QTR 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total |
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,600,000 |
|
|
$ |
590,000 |
|
Please refer to our Financial Statements below, beginning on page F-1, which are incorporated herein by reference.
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
There has been no change of accountants nor any disagreement with accountants on any matter of accounting principles or practices or financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure required to be reported under this Item.
Item 8A. Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys President and Chief Accounting Officer, the Companys management has evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report as defined in Rule 13a-15(b) or Rule 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation, the President and Chief Accounting Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective and ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Companys Exchange Act reports is (1) recorded, processed, summarized and reported in a timely manner, and (2) accumulated and communicated to management, including the President and our Chief Accounting Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting, as of the end of the period covered by this report, that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
None
21
Item 9. Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters, Control Persons and Corporate Governance; Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the definitive proxy statement for our 2007 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of our 2006 fiscal year. This proxy statement is referred to in this report as the 2007 Proxy Statement.
Item 10. Executive Compensation
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the 2007 Proxy Statement.
Item 11. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the 2007 Proxy Statement.
Item 12. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the 2007 Proxy Statement.
a. The following exhibits are filed as part of, or are incorporated by reference into, this report:
Exhibit No. |
|
|
|
Description |
3.1 |
|
Registrants Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed July 10, 2006 (Reg. No. 333-131216), as amended) |
||
3.2 |
|
Registrants Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed July 10, 2006 (Reg. No. 333-131216), as amended) |
||
3.3 |
|
Registrants Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed July 10, 2006 (Reg. No 333-131216), as amended) |
||
4.1 |
|
Form of Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed July 10, 2006 (Reg. No. 333-131216), as amended) |
||
4.2 |
|
Form of Class A Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed July 10, 2006 (Reg. No.333-131216), as amended) |
||
4.3 |
|
Form of Class B Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed July 10, 2006 (Reg. No. 333-131216), as amended) |
||
4.4 |
|
Form of Unit Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed July 10, 2006 (Reg. No. 333-131216), as amended) |
||
4.5 |
|
Form of Warrant Agreement Between the Registrant and Computershare Trust Company, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed July 10, 2006(Reg. No. 333-131216), as amended) |
||
4.6 |
|
Form of Representatives Purchase Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed July 10, 2006 (Reg. No 333-131216), as amended) |
22
Exhibit No. |
|
|
|
Description |
10.1 |
|
Employment Agreement with Matthew Foster (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed July 10, 2006 (Reg. No. 333-131216), as amended) |
||
10.2 |
|
Employment Agreement with Dr. Joseph Armstrong (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed July 10, 2006 (Reg. No. 333-131216), as amended) |
||
10.3 |
|
Employment Agreement with Janet Casteel (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed July 10, 2006 (Reg. No. 333-131216), as amended) |
||
10.4 |
|
Employment Agreement with Dr. Prem Nath* |
||
10.5 |
|
Employment Agreement with Joseph McCabe* |
||
10.6 |
|
Securities Purchase Agreement by and between the Registrant and ITN Energy Systems, Inc. CTR (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed July 10, 2006 (Reg. No. 333-131216), as amended) |
||
10.7 |
|
Invention and Trade Secret Assignment Agreement and between the Registrant and ITN Energy Systems, Inc. CTR (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed July 10, 2006 (Reg. No. 333-131216), as amended) |
||
10.8 |
|
Patent Application Assignment Agreement by and between the Registrant and ITN Energy Systems, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed July 10, 2006 (Reg. No. 333-131216), as amended) |
||
10.9 |
|
License Agreement by and between the Registrant and ITN Energy Systems, Inc. CTR (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed July 10, 2006 (Reg. No. 333-131216), as amended) |
||
10.10 |
|
Sublease Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed July 10, 2006 (Reg. No. 333-131216), as amended) |
||
10.11 |
|
Service Center Agreement by and between the Registrant and ITN Energy Systems, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed July 10, 2006 (Reg. No. 333-131216), as amended) |
||
10.12 |
|
Manufacturing Line Agreement by and between the Registrant and ITN Energy Systems, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed July 10, 2006 (Reg. No. 333-131216), as amended) |
||
10.13 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to Manufacturing Line Agreement between the Registrant and ITN Energy Systems, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7A to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed July 10, 2006 (Reg. No. 333-131216), as amended) |
||
10.14 |
|
Administrative Services Agreement by and between the Registrant and ITN Energy Systems, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed July 10, 2006 (Reg. No. 333-131216), as amended) |
||
10.15 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to Administrative Services Agreement between the Registrant and ITN Energy Systems, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8A to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed July 10, 2006 (Reg. No. 333-131216), as amended) |
||
10.16 |
|
2005 Stock Option Plan and Form of Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed July 10, 2006 (Reg. No. 333-131216), as amended) |
||
10.17 |
|
Bridge Unit Purchase and Investor Subscription agreement with forms of promissory note and bridge right (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed July 10, 2006 (Reg. No. 333-131216), as amended) |
23
10.18 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to Bridge Unit Purchase and Investor Subscription Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed July 10, 2006 (Reg. No. 333-131216), as amended) |
10.19 |
|
Amendment to Annex B to Bridge to Bridge Unit Purchase and Investor Subscription Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13A to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed July 10, 2006 (Reg. No. 333-131216), as amended) |
10.20 |
|
Non-Exclusive Patent License Agreement with Midwest Research Institute (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed July 10, 2006 (Reg. No. 333-131216), as amended) |
10.21 |
|
Letter Agreement with the University of Delaware (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed July 10, 2006 (Reg. No. 333-131216), as amended) |
10.22 |
|
License Agreement between UD Technology Corporation and Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our current report on Form 8K filed November 29, 2007) CTR |
10.23 |
|
Novation Agreement with ITN Energy Systems, Inc. and the United States Government* |
10.24 |
|
Amendment to Service Center Agreement with ITN Energy Systems, Inc.* |
10.25 |
|
Amendment to Sublease Agreement with ITN Energy Systems, Inc.* |
10.26 |
|
Securities Purchase Agreement with Norsk Hydro Produksjon AS (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to our current report on form 8K filed March 13, 2007) |
10.27 |
|
Stockholders Agreement with Norsk Hydro Produksjon AS (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to our current report on form 8K filed March 13, 2007) |
10.28 |
|
Registration Rights Agreement with Norsk Hydro Produksjon AS (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to our current report on form 8K filed March 13, 2007) |
10.29 |
|
Voting Agreement with Norsk Hydro Produksjon AS (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 to our current report on form 8K filed March 13, 2007) |
10.30 |
|
Consulting Agreement with Ashutosh Misra* |
14.1 |
|
Code of Ethics* |
31.1 |
|
Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* |
31.2 |
|
Chief Accounting Officer Certification pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* |
32.1 |
|
Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* |
32.2 |
|
Chief Accounting Officer Certification pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* |
* Filed herewith
CTR Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the 2007 Proxy Statement.
24
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(a) of the Exchange Act, the Registrant has caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on the 30 th day of March, 2007.
|
ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES |
|
|
By: |
/s/ M ATTHEW B. FOSTER |
|
|
Matthew B. Foster |
|
|
President & Chief Executive Officer |
In accordance with the Exchange Act, this Report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
Signature |
|
|
|
Capacities |
|
|
|
Date |
|
/s/ M ATTHEW B. FOSTER |
|
President & Chief Executive Officer |
|
March 30, 2007 |
||||||
Matthew B. Foster |
|
|
|
|
||||||
/s/ J ANET CASTEEL |
|
Chief Accounting Officer |
|
March 30, 2007 |
||||||
Janet Casteel |
|
|
|
|
||||||
/s/ MOHAN S. M ISRA |
|
Director |
|
March 30, 2007 |
||||||
Mohan S. Misra |
|
|
|
|
||||||
/s/ A SHUTOSH MISRA |
|
Director |
|
March 30, 2007 |
||||||
Ashutosh Misra |
|
|
|
|
||||||
/s/ F RASER RUSSELL |
|
Director |
|
March 30, 2007 |
||||||
Fraser Russell |
|
|
|
|
||||||
/s/ S TAN GALLERY |
|
Director |
|
March 30, 2007 |
||||||
Stan Gallery |
|
|
|
|
||||||
/s/ R ICHARD J . SWANSON |
|
Director |
|
March 30, 2007 |
||||||
Richard J. Swanson |
|
|
|
|
25
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
Page |
Financial Statements |
|
|
|
F-3 |
|
|
F-4 |
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
F-6 |
|
|
F-7 |
F- 1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms
To the Board of Directors
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.
Littleton, Colorado
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. (a Development Stage Company as defined by SFAS No. 7) as of December 31, 2006, and the related statements of operations, changes in stockholders equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2005 and for the periods from inception (October 18, 2005) through December 31, 2005 and 2006. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. as of December 31, 2006, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2006 and for the periods from inception (October 18, 2005) through December 31, 2005 and 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
HEIN & ASSOCIATES LLP |
Denver, Colorado |
March 29, 2007 |
F- 2
ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(A Development Stage Company as Defined by SFAS No. 7)
BALANCE SHEET
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
786,357 |
|
Short term investments |
|
9,885,000 |
|
|
Related party receivable |
|
4,440 |
|
|
Other current assets |
|
115,222 |
|
|
Total current assets |
|
10,791,019 |
|
|
Property & Equipment at Cost: |
|
103,643 |
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
(12,635 |
) |
|
|
|
91,008 |
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
Deposits on manufacturing equipment |
|
370,000 |
|
|
Patents |
|
37,568 |
|
|
|
|
407,568 |
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
11,289,595 |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
73,043 |
|
Related party payable |
|
183,954 |
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
121,636 |
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
378,633 |
|
|
Deferred Rent |
|
9,912 |
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 10) |
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock, $0.0001 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized, no shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, $0.0001 par value, 75,000,000 shares Authorized; 5,322,094 shares outstanding |
|
532 |
|
|
Additional Paid in Capital |
|
16,288,664 |
|
|
Deficit accumulated during the development stage |
|
(5,388,146 |
) |
|
Total Stockholders equity |
|
10,901,050 |
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
11,289,595 |
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-3
ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(A Development Stage Company as Defined by SFAS No. 7)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
For the Year Ended
|
|
For the Period
|
|
For the Period
|
|
|||||||||
General & Administrative Expenses |
|
|
$ |
3,056,219 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,204,494 |
|
|
|
4,260,713 |
|
|
|
Research & Development Expenses |
|
|
319,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
319,085 |
|
|
|||
Loss from Operations |
|
|
$ |
(3,375,304 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(1,204,494 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(4,579,798 |
) |
|
Other Income/(Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Interest expense |
|
|
(1,080,691 |
) |
|
|
(2,740 |
) |
|
|
(1,083,431 |
) |
|
|||
Interest income |
|
|
275,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
275,083 |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
(805,608 |
) |
|
|
(2,740 |
) |
|
|
(808,348 |
) |
|
|||
Net Loss |
|
|
$ |
(4,180,912 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(1,207,234 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(5,388,146 |
) |
|
Net Loss Per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
(Basic and diluted) |
|
|
$ |
(1.45 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(1.58 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
(Basic and diluted) |
|
|
2,881,639 |
|
|
|
761,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-4
ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Development Stage Company as Defined by SFAS No. 7)
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
For the Period from inception (October 18, 2005) through December 31,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
Total |
|
||||||||
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Preferred Stock |
|
Paid-In |
|
Accumulated |
|
Stockholders |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Capital |
|
Deficit |
|
Equity |
|
||||||||
Balance at inception, October 18, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Proceeds from sale of common stock
|
|
972,000 |
|
$ |
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
38,783 |
|
|
|
$ |
38,880 |
|
|
Stock Based Compensation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Founders Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
933,120 |
|
|
|
933,120 |
|
||||
Stock Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,004 |
|
|
|
26,004 |
|
||||
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,207,234 |
) |
(1,207,234 |
) |
||||
Balance, December 31, 2005 |
|
972,000 |
|
$ |
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
997,907 |
|
$ |
(1,207,234 |
) |
$ |
(209,230 |
) |
Transfer of assets at historical cost (1/06 @ $.03 per share) |
|
1,028,000 |
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,097 |
|
|
|
31,200 |
|
||||
Proceeds From IPO (7/06 @ $5.50 per unit) |
|
3,000,000 |
|
300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,499,700 |
|
|
|
16,500,000 |
|
||||
IPO Costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,392,071 |
) |
|
|
(2,392,071 |
) |
||||
Stock issued to Bridge Loan Lenders (7/06 @ $2.75 per share) |
|
290,894 |
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
799,971 |
|
|
|
800,000 |
|
||||
Exercise of Stock Options (9/06 & 12/06 @ $0.10 per share) |
|
31,200 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,117 |
|
|
|
3,120 |
|
||||
Stock Based CompensationStock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
348,943 |
|
|
|
348,943 |
|
||||
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,180,912 |
) |
$ |
(4,180,912 |
) |
|||
Balance, December 31, 2006 |
|
5,322,094 |
|
$ |
532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,288,664 |
|
$ |
(5,388,146 |
) |
$ |
10,901,050 |
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-5
ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(A Development Stage Company as Defined by SFAS No. 7)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
For the Year
|
|
For the Period
|
|
For the Period
|
|
|||||||
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Net loss |
|
$ |
(4,180,912 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,207,234 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(5,388,146 |
) |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
12,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,635 |
|
|
|||
Stock based compensation |
|
348,943 |
|
|
959,124 |
|
|
|
1,308,067 |
|
|
|||
Charge off of deferred financing costs to interest expense |
|
198,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
198,565 |
|
|
|||
Charge off of Bridge Loan discount to interest expense |
|
800,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
800,000 |
|
|
|||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Related party receivables |
|
(4,440 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(4,440 |
) |
|
|||
Current assets |
|
(115,222 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(115,222 |
) |
|
|||
Accounts payable |
|
30,070 |
|
|
42,974 |
|
|
|
73,044 |
|
|
|||
Related party payable |
|
135,076 |
|
|
48,878 |
|
|
|
183,954 |
|
|
|||
Deferred Rent |
|
9,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,912 |
|
|
|||
Accrued expenses |
|
8,026 |
|
|
113,609 |
|
|
|
121,635 |
|
|
|||
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
(2,757,347 |
) |
|
(42,649 |
) |
|
|
(2,799,996 |
) |
|
|||
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Purchases of available-for-sale-securities |
|
(46,244,450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(46,244,450 |
) |
|
|||
Maturities and sales of available for-sale securities |
|
36,359,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,359,450 |
|
|
|||
Purchase of equipment |
|
(97,399 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(97,399 |
) |
|
|||
Deposits on Manufacturing Equipment |
|
(370,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(370,000 |
) |
|
|||
Patent activity costs |
|
(12,611 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(12,611 |
) |
|
|||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(10,365,010 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(10,365,010 |
) |
|
|||
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Proceeds from Bridge Loan financing |
|
1,600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,600,000 |
|
|
|||
Repayment of Bridge Loan financing |
|
(1,600,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(1,600,000 |
) |
|
|||
Payment of financing costs |
|
(171,401 |
) |
|
(27,165 |
) |
|
|
(198,566 |
) |
|
|||
Payment of offering costs |
|
(2,251,064 |
) |
|
(141,007 |
) |
|
|
(2,392,071 |
) |
|
|||
Proceeds from note |
|
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|||
Repayment of note |
|
(200,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(200,000 |
) |
|
|||
Proceeds from sale of stock |
|
16,503,120 |
|
|
38,880 |
|
|
|
16,542,000 |
|
|
|||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
13,880,655 |
|
|
70,708 |
|
|
|
13,951,363 |
|
|
|||
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
758,298 |
|
|
28,059 |
|
|
|
786,357 |
|
|
|||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
|
28,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
|
$ |
786,357 |
|
|
$ |
28,059 |
|
|
|
$ |
786,357 |
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
84,819 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
84,819 |
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Non-Cash Transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
ITN initial contribution of assets for equity |
|
$ |
31,200 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,200 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
F- 6
ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(A Development Stage Company as Defined by SFAS No. 7)
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. (Ascent or the Company) was incorporated on October 18, 2005 to commercialize certain PV technologies developed by ITN Energy Systems, Inc. (ITN), a Colorado corporation dedicated to the development of thin-film, photovoltaic (PV), battery and fuel cell technologies. ITN had invested considerable resources in the research and development of Copper-Indium-Gallium-Diselenide (CIGS) PV technology. ITN formed Ascent to commercialize this CIGS PV technology, initially for the space and near-space markets and ultimately for the terrestrial market. In January 2006, in exchange for 1,028,000 shares of common stock of Ascent (bringing to 2,000,000 the total number of outstanding shares in the Company), ITN: (i) assigned its CIGS PV technologies and trade secrets (Transferred Assets) to Ascent; (ii) licensed certain proprietary process, control and design technologies to Ascent; (iii) assigned or agreed to seek permission to assign certain contract rights relating to its CIGS PV business to Ascent; (iv) transferred certain key personnel to Ascent; (v) agreed to assist in the design and build of Ascents initial production line, which will utilize ITNs proprietary roll-to-roll processing tools, real-time intelligent processing controls and thin-film processing technologies; and (vi) agreed to provide administrative services such as facilities management, equipment maintenance, human resources and accounting.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation: The Companys activities to date have substantially consisted of raising capital and research and development. Accordingly, the Company is considered to be in the development stage, as defined in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 7 (SFAS No. 7), Accounting and Reporting by Development Stage Enterprises.
Short-Term Investments: The Companys short-term investments, which are classified as available-for-sale securities, are invested in high-grade variable rate demand notes, which have a final maturity date of up to 30 years but whose interest rate is reset at varying intervals typically between 1 and 7 days. Variable rate demand notes can be readily liquidated at any interest rate reset date, either by putting them back to the original issuer or by putting them to a third-party remarketer as generally provided in the original prospectus. To date, the Company has always been able to redeem its holdings of these securities in accordance with their terms, and the Company believes that the risk of non-redemption is minimal. Consequently, these securities are available for use to support the current cash needs of our operations, and in accordance with Accounting Research Bulletin 43, they are classified as short-term investments.
Cash Equivalents: The Company considers all highly liquid debt securities purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Revenue Recognition: Revenue from cost-type contracts is recognized as costs are incurred on the basis of direct costs plus allowable indirect costs and an allocable portion of the fixed fee. Revenue from fixed price-type contracts is recognized under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting, with costs and estimated profits included in contract revenue as work is performed. If actual and estimated costs to complete a contract indicate a loss, provision is made currently for the loss anticipated on the contract. Revenue from time and materials contracts is recognized as costs are incurred at amounts represented by the agreed-upon billing amounts.
F- 7
ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(A Development Stage Company as Defined by SFAS No. 7)
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Patents: To the extent the Company obtains or is awarded patents, patent costs will be amortized on a straight line basis over the legal life, or, over their estimated useful lives, whichever is shorter.
Deferred Financing Costs: Costs incurred in connection with obtaining debt are capitalized as deferred financing costs and are amortized to interest expense over the life of the related debt.
Deferred Offering Costs: The Company capitalizes costs associated with the issuance of stock as they are incurred. Upon issuance of the stock, such issue costs are treated as a reduction of the offering proceeds and accordingly charged to additional paid in capital.
Property and Equipment: Property and equipment are recorded at the original cost to the Company. Assets are being depreciated over estimated useful lives of one to seven years using the straight-line method.
Income Taxes: Current income tax expense is the amount of income taxes expected to be payable for the current year. Deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year end based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable earnings. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount more likely than not to be related.
Risks and uncertainties: The Companys operations are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including those associated with: the ability to meet obligations; continuing losses; fluctuation in operating results; funding expansions; strategic alliances; financing arrangement terms that may restrict operations; regulatory issues; and competition. Additionally, U.S. government contracts may be terminated prior to completion of full funding by the U.S. government.
Use of estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Net loss per common share: Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, Earnings Per Share, provides for the calculation of Basic and Diluted earnings per share. Basic earnings per share include no dilution and are computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential of securities that could share in the earnings of the Company, similar to fully diluted earnings per share.
Research and development costs: Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
Recent accounting pronouncements: In February 2006, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments (SFAS 155), which amends SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities . SFAS 155 simplifies the accounting for certain derivatives embedded in other financial instruments by allowing them
F- 8
ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(A Development Stage Company as Defined by SFAS No. 7)
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
to be accounted for as a whole if the holder elects to account for the whole instrument on a fair value basis. The statement also clarifies and amends certain other provisions of SFAS No. 133 and SFAS No. 140. SFAS 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired, issued, or subject to a remeasurement event occurring in fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS 155 to have an impact on our results of operations or financial condition.
In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assetsan amendment to FASB Statement No. 140 (SFAS 156). SFAS 156 requires that all separately recognized servicing rights be initially measured at fair value, if practicable. In addition, this statement permits an entity to choose between two measurement methods (amortization method or fair value measurement method) for each class of separately recognized servicing assets and liabilities. This new accounting standard is effective January 1, 2007. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS 156 to have an impact on our results of operations or financial condition.
In June 2006, the FASB ratified the consensus reached by the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) on EITF Issue No. 05-01, Accounting for the Conversion of an Instrument That Becomes Convertible Upon the Issuers Exercise of a Call Option (EITF 05-01). The EITF consensus applies to the issuance of equity securities to settle a debt instrument that was not otherwise currently convertible but became convertible upon the issuers exercise of call option when the issuance of equity securities is pursuant to the instruments original conversion terms. The adoption of EITF 05-01 is not expected to have an impact on our results of operations or financial condition.
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes . FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 also prescribes a recognition and threshold and measurement standard for the financial statement recognition and measurement of an income tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. In addition, FIN 48 provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The Company presently recognizes income tax positions based on managements estimate of whether it is reasonably possible that a liability has been incurred for unrecognized income tax benefits by applying FASB Statement No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies. The provisions of FIN 48 will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2007 and are to be applied to all tax positions upon initial application of this standard. Only tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold at the effective date may be recognized or continue to be recognized upon adoption. The cumulative effect of applying the provisions of FIN 48 will be reported as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings for the fiscal year of adoption. The Company believes that the opening balance of retained earnings will not be affected due to the adoption of FIN 48.
In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157). SFAS No. 157 provides enhanced guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 157 clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing the assets or liabilities and establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. SFAS No. 157 applies whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial
F- 9
ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(A Development Stage Company as Defined by SFAS No. 7)
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 157 on our results of operations and financial condition.
In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans (SFAS No. 158). SFAS No. 158 requires an employer to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit pension plan and other postretirement plans as an asset or liability on its balance sheet and recognize changes in its funded status in the year in which the change occurs through accumulated other nonnowner changes in equity. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS 158 to have an impact on our results of operations or financial condition.
In February 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS 159). SFAS 159 allows the Company to choose to measure many financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Therefore, the Company is required to adopt SFAS 159 by the first quarter of 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the requirements of SFAS 159 and the potential impact on the Companys financial statements.
We have reviewed all other recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting pronouncements and do not believe any such pronouncements will have a material impact on our financial statements.
NOTE 3: LIQUIDITY AND CONTINUED OPERATIONS
As discussed in Note 1, the Company is in the development stage and is currently incurring significant losses from operations. The Company currently does not have manufacturing capabilities or other means to generate revenues or cash. The net proceeds from the IPO are being used to build our operational infrastructure and to develop the manufacturing capacity necessary to produce PV products for sale into our target markets. With our 2007 expected capital expenditure requirement of approximately $9.6 million and an additional $350,000 in monthly operational costs, the IPO funds alone will not be sufficient to cover our operations. As a result, there were concerns about the liquidity of the Company as of December 31, 2006.
In March 2007, the Company completed a private placement of 1,600,000 shares of our common stock with Norsk Hydro, at a purchase price of $9,236,000 (Note 12). The Company does believe that the proceeds from this investment will enable it to continue as a going concern through December 31, 2007.
F- 10
ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(A Development Stage Company as Defined by SFAS No. 7)
NOTE 4: PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment consisted of the following at December 31, 2006:
Computer equipment |
|
$ |
47,771 |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
2,716 |
|
|
Construction in process: |
|
|
|
|
R&D equipment in process |
|
53,156 |
|
|
|
|
103,643 |
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
|
12,635 |
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
$ |
91,008 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2006 and for the period from inception (October 18, 2005) through December 31, 2005 was $12,635 and $0, respectively.
NOTE 5: DEBT
In January 2006 , the Company completed a $1.6 million bridge loan (Bridge Financing) from lenders (Bridge Noteholders) to help meet the Companys working capital needs. The loans (Bridge Loans) accrued interest at an annual rate of 10% and were due and payable on the earlier of January 2007 or the completion of Ascents public offering of equity securities with gross proceeds of at least $5,000,000 (Qualified Public Offering). In July 2006, with the proceeds from a Qualified Public Offering (i.e., the Companys initial public offering or IPO), the Company repaid the Bridge Loans with accrued interest.
In connection with the Bridge Loans, the Company issued rights (Bridge Rights) to the Bridge Noteholders. One Bridge Right was issued for every $25,000 loaned. In July 2006, upon completion of the IPO, the holders of Bridge Rights received restricted units. The holder of each Bridge Right received that number of units equal to $25,000 divided by the IPO price of the units of $5.50 for a total of 290,894 units. The units are identical to those offered in Ascents IPO and consisted of one share of common stock, one redeemable Class A public warrant and two non-redeemable Class B public warrants. In September 2006, the SEC declared effective the Companys Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (Reg. No. 333-137008) for the shares and warrants underlying the 290,894 units issued in connection with the Bridge Rights.
Paulson Investment Company, Inc. acted as the placement agent for the Bridge Financing. The Company paid Paulson Investment Company, Inc. a commission equal to 10% of the gross proceeds from the Bridge Financing, plus reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. The Bridge Loans and the Bridge Rights were allocated for accounting purposes based on the relative fair values of the Bridge Loans without the Bridge Rights and the Bridge Rights themselves at the time of issuance. The actual value of the Bridge Loans and the Bridge Rights was computed at $1,600,000 each for a total value of $3,200,000. Since they were each of equal value, the $1,600,000 of proceeds was allocated 50% to the Bridge Loans and 50% to the Bridge Rights (i.e. $800,000 each). The Bridge Rights of $800,000 were accounted for as paid-in capital.
The discount for the commission ($160,000) and the Bridge Rights ($800,000) were amortized into interest expense over the life of the loans. In July 2006 with the repayment of the Bridge Loans, the
F- 11
ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(A Development Stage Company as Defined by SFAS No. 7)
NOTE 5: DEBT (Continued)
remaining unamortized balance of the discount for commission and Bridge Rights was recognized as interest expense in the statement of operations. For the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company recorded $960,000 in interest expense related to these discounts.
NOTE 6: STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
The Companys authorized capital stock consists of 75,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.0001 par value, and 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.0001 par value. In November 2005, the Company issued 972,000 shares of common stock at a price of $0.04 per share. The Company has recorded for financial statement purposes the 972,000 shares at a fair value of $1.00 per share. The statement of stockholders equity reflects compensation expense of $933,120 related to the recording of this stock transaction. In January 2006, in consideration of certain asset transfers, licenses and service agreements (see Note 1), the Company issued 1,028,000 shares of common stock to ITN Energy Systems, Inc.
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value per share, may be issued in classes or series. Designations, powers, preferences, rights, qualifications, limitations and restrictions are determined by the Companys Board of Directors.
On July 10, 2006, the SEC declared effective the Companys Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (Reg. No. 333-131216), and we completed our IPO of 3,000,000 units on July 14, 2006. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock, one redeemable Class A public warrant and two non-redeemable Class B public warrants. The managing underwriter of our initial public offering was Paulson Investment Company, Inc. The initial public offering price was $5.50 per unit. The gross proceeds of the offering were $16,500,000. Our net proceeds from the offering, after deducting the underwriters discount of $1,097,250 and other fees and expenses, aggregated approximately $14,000,000.
The common stock and Class A and Class B public warrants traded only as a unit through August 9, 2006, after which the common stock, the Class A public warrants and the Class B public warrants began trading separately.
Class A public warrants The Class A public warrants included in the units became exercisable on August 10, 2006. The exercise price of a Class A public warrant is $6.60. The Class A public warrants expire on July 10, 2011, the fifth anniversary of the closing of the IPO.
The Company has the right to redeem the Class A public warrants at a redemption price of $0.25 per warrant beginning January 6, 2007. The redemption right arises if the last reported sale price of the Companys common stock equals or exceeds $9.35 for five consecutive trading days ending prior to the date of the notice of redemption. The Company is required to provide 30 days prior written notice to the Class A public warrant holders of the Companys intention to redeem the warrants. As of December 31, 2006, 3,290,894 Class A public warrants were outstanding.
Class B public warrants The Class B warrants included in the units became exercisable on August 10, 2006. The exercise price of a Class B public warrant is $11.00. The Class B public warrants expire on July 10, 2011, the fifth anniversary of the closing of the IPO. The Company does not have the right to redeem the Class B public warrants. As of December 31, 2006, 6,581,788 Class B public warrants were outstanding.
F- 12
ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(A Development Stage Company as Defined by SFAS No. 7)
NOTE 6: STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (Continued)
Representative Warrants Representative warrants were issued to underwriters of the Companys initial public offering in July 2006. As of December 31, 2006, 300,000 Representative warrants remained outstanding to purchase units at $6.60. A unit consists of one share of common stock, one Class A redeemable public warrant and two Class B non-redeemable public warrants. The warrants become exercisable after the closing date of the IPO. The warrants expire on July 10, 2011, the fifth anniversary of the closing of the IPO.
As of December 31, 2006, the Company had 5,322,094 shares of common stock and no shares of preferred stock outstanding.
NOTE 7: STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
The Companys 2005 Stock Option Plan (the Option Plan), as amended, provides for the grant of incentive or non-statutory stock options to the Companys employees, directors and consultants. A total of 750,000 shares of common stock are reserved for issuance under the Option Plan. The Board of Directors and the Companys stockholders approved the plan in October and November 2005, respectively.
The Option Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, which determines the terms of the options, including the exercise price, expiration date, vesting schedule and number of shares. The term of any incentive stock option granted under the Option Plan may not exceed ten years, or five years for options granted to an optionee owning more than 10% of the Companys voting stock. The exercise price of an incentive stock option granted under the Option Plan must be equal to or greater than the fair market value of the shares of the Companys common stock on the date the option is granted. An incentive stock option granted to an optionee owning more than 10% of the Companys voting stock must have an exercise price equal to or grater than 110% of the fair market value of the Companys common stock on the date the option is granted. The exercise price of a non-statutory option granted under the Option Plan must be equal to or greater than 85% of the fair market value of the shares of the Companys common stock on the date the option is granted.
In November 2005, the Company granted options to purchase 408,000 shares of common stock under the Option Plan, all at an exercise price of $0.10 per share. For the year ended December 31, 2006 , an additional 336,000 options were granted, 75,000 options were cancelled and 31,200 options were exercised. As of December 31, 2006, there were outstanding options to purchase 637,800 shares of common stock under the Option Plan. As of December 31, 2006, 81,000 shares remained available for future grants under the Option Plan.
The Company accounts for share-based payments under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, (SFAS 123(R)) which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors including employee stock options based on estimated fair values.
F- 13
ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(A Development Stage Company as Defined by SFAS No. 7)
NOTE 7: STOCK BASED COMPENSATION (Continued)
SFAS 123(R) requires companies to estimate the fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the requisite service period in our Statement of Operations. Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2006 and for the period from inception (October 18, 2005) through December 31, 2005 based on awards ultimately expected to vest and it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. SFAS 123(R) requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.
For purposes of determining estimated fair value of share-based payment awards on the date of grant under SFAS 123(R), we used the Black-Scholes option-pricing model (Black-Scholes Model). The Black-Scholes Model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions. Because our employee stock options may have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in managements opinion, the existing models may not provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options. In addition, Management will continue to assess the assumptions and methodologies used to calculate estimated fair value of share-based compensation. Circumstances may change and additional data may become available over time, which result in changes to these assumptions and methodologies, which could materially impact our fair value determination.
The weighted average estimated fair value of employee stock options granted for the year ended December 31, 2006 and for the period from inception (October 18, 2005) through December 31, 2005 was $2.07 and $1.94 per share, respectively, using the Black-Scholes Model with the following weighted average assumptions:
|
|
For the Year
|
|
For the Period
|
|
||||
Expected volatility |
|
|
90.2 |
% |
|
|
81.1 |
% |
|
Risk free interest rate |
|
|
4.62 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
Expected dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected life (in years) |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
We based our estimate of expected volatility, risk free interest rate and expected term on disclosures made by peers. Forfeitures were estimated, based on historical employee retention experience among staff of similar position to those granted options in our plan.
Stock based compensation recognized under SFAS 123(R) for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $348,943 of which $159,098 related to options granted to officers and directors and $189,845 to outside providers. Stock-based compensation recognized under SFAS 123(R) for the period from inception (October 18, 2005) through December 31, 2005 was $26,004, of which $12,704 related to options granted to officers and directors and $13,300 to outside providers. Stock-based compensation expense is calculated on a straight-line basis over the vesting periods of the related options. In future periods, the compensation
F- 14
ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(A Development Stage Company as Defined by SFAS No. 7)
NOTE 7: STOCK BASED COMPENSATION (Continued)
expense that we record under SFAS 123(R) may differ significantly from what we have recorded in the current period, as we build company-specific performance history.
As of December 31, 2006, we have approximately $811,000 of total compensation cost ($466,000 to officers and directors and $345,000 to outside providers) related to nonvested awards not yet recognized and expect to recognize these costs over a weighted average period of approximately 3 years.
The following schedule summarizes activity in our stock-option plan (shares in thousands):
|
|
Stock Option
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|||||||
OUTSTANDING AT OCTOBER 18, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
OUTSTANDING AT DECEMBER 31, 2005 |
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
$ |
4.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
$ |
2.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
$ |
2.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
$ |
2.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(.10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(.10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(4.25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
OUTSTANDING AT DECEMBER 31, 2006 |
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
$ |
1.83 |
|
|
|
6.84 |
|
|
EXERCISABLE AT DECEMBER 31, 2006 |
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
$ |
1.59 |
|
|
|
6.02 |
|
|
As of December 31, 2006, approximately 445,000 shares were expected to vest in the future at a weighted average exercise price of $1.80.
The following table contains details of our outstanding stock options:
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Number
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Number
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
|
|
(In Thousands) |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2006: |
|
|
$ |
2.71 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
$ |
2.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2.73 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
$ |
2.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2.76 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
$ |
2.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4.25 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
$ |
4.25 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
$ |
4.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
NOTE 8: INCOME TAXES
The company records taxes using the liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed for the expected future impact of temporary differences between the financial
F- 15
ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(A Development Stage Company as Defined by SFAS No. 7)
NOTE 8: INCOME TAXES (Continued)
statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities using current income tax rates and for the expected future tax benefit to be derived from tax loss and tax credit carry-forwards.
At December 31, 2006, the Company has approximately $374,000 in net operating loss carry-forwards that will expire beginning in 2025. Under the Internal Revenue Code, the future utilization of net operating losses may be limited in certain circumstances where there is a significant ownership change. As a result of the initial public offering, a significant ownership change may have occurred.
Deferred income taxes represent an estimate of the income tax that will be due in future periods from the cumulative temporary differences recognized for financial reporting purposes from that recognized for income tax reporting purposes. At December 31, 2006, the components of these temporary differences and the deferred tax asset were as follows:
Deferred Tax Asset |
|
|
|
|
Non-current: |
|
|
|
|
Stock Based CompensationStock Options |
|
$ |
64,000 |
|
Tax effect of NOL carry forward |
|
131,000 |
|
|
Start-up costs |
|
1,025,000 |
|
|
Net deferred tax asset |
|
1,220,000 |
|
|
Less valuation allowance |
|
(1,220,000 |
) |
|
Net deferred tax asset |
|
$ |
-0- |
|
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. Based upon the level of historical losses and projections of future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, a full valuation allowance has been provided due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing and the amount of future revenues. Our deferred tax valuation allowance of $1,220,000 reflected above is an increase of $780,000 from the valuation allowance reflected as of December 31, 2005 of $440,000.
The Companys effective tax rate differs from the statutory rate due to the following (expressed as a percentage of pre-tax income):
|
|
2006 |
|
||
Federal statutory rate |
|
|
(35 |
)% |
|
State statutory rate |
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
Permanent tax differences |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
Other |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
Increase in valuation allowance |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
NOTE 9: RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Included in General and Administrative Expenses for the year ended December 31, 2006 and for the period from inception (October 18, 2005) through December 31, 2005 is $1,170,226, and $86,228,
F- 16
ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(A Development Stage Company as Defined by SFAS No. 7)
NOTE 9: RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Continued)
respectively, of costs to ITN for facility and manufacturing, business development, and administrative support expenses. Included in administrative support expenses for the year ended December 31, 2006 and for the period from inception (October 18, 2005) through December 31, 2005 is $172,343, and $25,567, respectively, of investor, financing and operational support activities performed by one of our Board of Directors who is also an employee of ITN. Included in Research and Development Expense for the year ended December 31, 2006 and for the period from inception (October 18, 2005) through December 31, 2005 is $302,744, and $0, respectively, of costs to ITN for research and development activity. Included in Property and Equipment as of December 31, 2006 are $43,971 of costs to ITN for the construction of research and development equipment. Related party payable of $183,954 as of December 31, 2006 represents costs remaining to be paid to ITN for these expenditures and amounts payable to officers and directors for Board of Directors fees and reimbursement of travel expenditures.
NOTE 10: COMMITMENTS
On November 1, 2005, the Company entered into a sublease agreement with ITN, a greater than five percent stockholder of the Company, to lease office space in Littleton, Colorado. In 2005 and 2006, two Board members of Ascent were partial owners of the Company who leased this office space to ITN. Future minimum payments due under the sublease are as follows:
Year ending December 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
$ |
151,281 |
|
||
2008 |
|
$ |
158,596 |
|
||
2009 |
|
$ |
158,596 |
|
||
2010 |
|
$ |
79,298 |
|
The Company also is responsible for payment of pass-through expenses such as property taxes, insurance, water and utilities. Rent expense for the year ended December 31, 2006 and for the period from inception (October 18, 2005) through December 31, 2005 was $150,245 and $9,550, respectively.
In 2006, the Company entered into two non-exclusive patent license agreements. In consideration for the right to license certain inventions, the Company is required to pay annual royalty payments based on net sales of products manufactured using the licensed technology. If there are no net sales of products manufactured using the licensed technology, then a minimum royalty payment is required. Included in general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2006 is $11,096 of minimum royalty payments associated with these patent license agreements.
NOTE 11: RETIREMENT PLAN
On July 1, 2006, the Company adopted a qualified 401(k) plan which provides retirement benefits for all of its eligible employees. Under the plan, employees become eligible to participate at the first entry date, provided that they are at least 21 years of age. The participants may elect through salary reduction to
F- 17
ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(A Development Stage Company as Defined by SFAS No. 7)
NOTE 11: RETIREMENT PLAN (Continued)
contribute up to 66% of their gross annual earnings, up to ceilings established in the Internal Revenue Code. The Company will match 100% of the first six percent of employee contributions. In addition, the Company may make discretionary contributions to the Plan as determined by the Board of Directors. Employees are immediately vested in all salary reduction contributions. Rights to benefits provided by the Companys discretionary and matching contributions vest 100% after the first year of service.
NOTE 12: SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Effective January 1, 2007, the Company completed the novation, or transfer, of approximately $3.5 million in government funded research and development (R&D) contracts from ITN. The various contracts are being performed for U.S. government customers that include the Air Force Research Laboratory, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. In addition to approximately $1.6 million in remaining firm revenues to be provided under the transferred contracts, the key scientists, engineers, and process technicians responsible for performing the contracts have also been transferred from ITN to become full-time Ascent employees. Ascent also amended its sublease agreement with ITN to include an additional 4,331 sq. feet at their existing location to accommodate this activity. The monthly rent expense was increased by $5,214 per month for the additional space. As before, Ascent is responsible for payment of pass-through expenses such as property taxes, insurance, water and utilities.
As of March 1, 2007, the Company entered into approximately $9.1 million of manufacturing equipment purchase agreements and a construction contractor agreement to complete their 1.5 MW production line and to make facility modifications. Included in the $9.1 million equipment purchase agreements is a purchase order to ITN for $1.5 million to develop the CIGS deposition and source box that is located inside the CIGS vacuum chamber. As of December 31, 2006, the Company had made down payments of $370,000 to the manufacturing equipment suppliers related to these purchase agreements. As of March 1, 2007, another $1,472,000 of down payments has been made. The Company anticipates that the manufacturing equipment will be delivered and installed during the 3 rd and 4 th quarters of 2007.
Private Placement of Securities:
We completed a private placement of securities with Norsk Hydro Produksjon AS (Norsk Hydro) in March 2007. Norsk Hydro is a subsidiary of Norsk Hydro ASA, one of the worlds leading suppliers of energy and aluminum, with approximately 33,000 employees in nearly 40 countries. Norsk Hyrdo purchased 1,600,000 shares of our common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $9,236,000. In connection with the private placement, Norsk Hydro was granted options to purchase additional shares and warrants, which it may exercise if and after shareholder approval is obtained.
F- 18
Exhibit 10.4
EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
THIS EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this Agreement ) is entered into as of July 19, 2006 (the Effective Date ), by and between Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company ), and Prem Nath (the Executive ).
RECITALS
A. The Company desires to employ and retain the unique experience, abilities, and services of the Executive as Senior Vice President of Manufacturing.
B. The Executive agrees to perform the services of Senior Vice President of Manufacturing for the Company in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the respective covenants and agreements of the parties contained in this Agreement, the Company and Executive agree as follows:
1. Term . The term of this Agreement is for three (3) years, commencing on July 31 st , 2006 (the Start Date ), unless amended by agreement of the parties or terminated as set forth in Section 5.
2. Duties . The Executive will devote his full business time, energies and best efforts to the promotion of the business and affairs of the Company, with responsibility to perform such duties as are specified from time to time by the Board of Directors of the Company (the Board ) and/or the chief executive officer of the Company (the CEO ).
3. Compensation .
a) Base Compensation. In consideration of all services to be rendered by the Executive to the Company, the Company will pay to the Executive the base salary of $160,000 per year from the Start Date through the termination of this Agreement and any extensions of it ( Base Salary ), payable in accordance with the Companys standard payroll practices.
b) Bonus Compensation. As further compensation, the Company may pay to the Executive an annual bonus of up to thirty percent (30%) of Base Salary, at such times and in such amounts as the Board and its Compensation Committee may determine in their discretion based on the Executives individual performance;
c) Equity Compensation . As further compensation, upon approval by the Compensation Committee of the Board, on or after the Start Date, the Company will grant the Executive options to purchase up to 100,000 shares of the Companys common stock, vesting in co-equal amounts (to the extent possible) over three (3) years from the date of grant, at an
1
exercise price equal to the closing price of the Companys common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market on the date of grant. The options shall be governed by and issued under the Companys 2005 Stock Option Plan.
d) Vacation. The Executive will receive four (4) weeks of paid vacation for each contract year of this Agreement, commencing on the Start Date. Vacation will be prorated in the event of termination pursuant to Section 5. The Executive will not be entitled to carry over accrued but unused vacation from one contract year to the next.
e) Relocation Expenses . The Company will reimburse the Executive for all reasonable and documented moving expenses (including taxes paid by the Executive as part of receiving such reimbursement) incurred in connection with the relocation of the Executive and his immediate family members to Littleton, Colorado or its environs. In connection with such relocation, the Company also will provide the Executive with a three bedroom townhome or residence in Littleton, Colorado or its environs for temporary housing for up to six (6) months so as to accommodate the Executives plans to rent or sell his current residence in Michigan.
f) Benefit Plans . To the extent permitted by law and except as otherwise may be determined by the Board, the Executive will be eligible to participate in the Companys standard benefit plans according to plan provisions.
4. Confidential Information .
a) Company Information. Executive agrees at all times during the term of his employment and thereafter, to hold in strictest confidence, and not to use, except for the benefit of the Company, or to disclose to any person, firm or corporation without written authorization of the Board of Directors of the Company, any Confidential Information (as defined below) of the Company. For purposes of this Agreement Confidential Information is defined as any Company proprietary information, technical data, trade secrets or know-how, including, but not limited to, research, product plans, products, services, customer lists and customers, markets, software, developments, inventions, processes, formulas, technology, designs, drawings, engineering, hardware configuration information, marketing, finances or other business information disclosed to Executive by the Company either directly or indirectly in writing, orally or by drawings or observation of parts or equipment. Confidential Information does not include any of the foregoing items which has become publicly known and made generally available through no wrongful act of Executive or of others who were under confidentiality obligations as to the item or items involved.
b) Former Employer Information. Executive agrees that he will not, during his employment with the Company, improperly use or disclose any proprietary information or trade secrets of any former or concurrent employer or other person or entity and that he will not bring onto the premises of the Company any unpublished document or proprietary information belonging to any such employer, person or entity unless consented to in writing by such employer, person or entity.
2
c) Third Party Information. Executive recognizes that the Company has received and in the future will receive from third parties their confidential or proprietary information subject to a duty on the Companys part to maintain the confidentiality of such information and to use it only for certain limited purposes. Executive agrees to hold all such confidential or proprietary information in the strictest confidence and not to disclose it to any person, firm or corporation or to use it except as necessary in carrying out his work for the Company consistent with the Companys agreement with such third party.
5. Termination of Employment .
a) Termination for Cause. Notwithstanding any provision contained in this Agreement to the contrary, the Company may immediately terminate this Agreement for Cause (as defined below) without giving notice or compensation to the Executive. For purposes of this Agreement Cause includes but is not limited to the following: (i) the conviction of the Executive or a pleading of guilty or nolo contendere to any felony or misdemeanor, or any crime involving moral turpitude, (ii) a material breach by Executive of his obligations under this Agreement, which will include a failure to perform such duties as are reasonably assigned to the Executive by the Board, (iii) any act by Executive of disloyalty to the Company, or (iv) any violation of Executives fiduciary duties to the Company.
b) Termination Without Cause. Either the Company or the Executive may terminate this Agreement without Cause on giving not less than 30 days prior written notice to the other party.
c) Disability. Unless prohibited by applicable law, this Agreement may be terminated if the Executive suffers a Permanent Disability (as defined below). For purposes of this Agreement, Permanent Disability is defined as the Executives inability, due to illness, accident, or other cause, to perform the majority of his usual duties for a period of three (3) months or more despite reasonable accommodation by the Company.
d) Death. If the Executive dies, this Agreement will automatically terminate.
6. Compensation Upon Termination .
a) Termination for Cause. If the Executive is terminated for Cause pursuant to Section 5(a), the Company will pay the Executive only his Base Salary accrued through the date of termination.
b) Termination Without Cause. If the Executive is terminated without Cause pursuant to Section 5(b), the Company will pay the Executive his Base Salary for a period of twelve (12) months after the date of termination.
c) Disability. During any period that the Executive fails to perform his duties and responsibilities hereunder as a result of incapacity due to physical or mental illness, the Executive will continue to receive his Base Salary until the Executives employment is
3
terminated pursuant to Section 5(c) and thereafter the Executive will receive any disability insurance benefits to which the Executive is entitled.
d) Death. If this Agreement terminates due to the death of the Executive, then any interests that the Executive may have under the provisions of this Agreement will be payable to the Executives estate inclusive of Base Salary provided for in this Agreement as if the Executive terminated his employment without Cause.
7. Board Approval . No part of this Agreement will be effective or binding upon the parties unless and until approved or ratified by the Compensation Committee of the Board.
8. Successors . The Company will require any successor (whether direct or indirect, by purchase, merger, consolidation or otherwise) to all or substantially all of the business and/or assets of the Company to expressly assume and agree to perform this Agreement in the same manner and to the same extent that the Company would be required to perform it if no such succession had taken place.
9. Arbitration . Any dispute or controversy arising under or in connection with this Agreement will be settled exclusively by arbitration in Denver, Colorado, in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association then in effect by an arbitrator selected by both parties within 10 days after either party has notified the other in writing that it desires a dispute between them to be settled by arbitration. In the event the parties cannot agree on such arbitrator within such 10-day period, each party will select an arbitrator and inform the other party in writing of such arbitrators name and address within 5 days after the end of such 10-day period and the two arbitrators so selected will select a third arbitrator within 15 days thereafter; provided, however, that in the event of a failure by either party to select an arbitrator and notify the other party of such selection within the time period provided above, the arbitrator selected by the other party will be the sole arbitrator of the dispute. Each party will pay its own expenses associated with such arbitration, including the expense of any arbitrator selected by such party and the Company will pay the expenses of the jointly selected arbitrator. The decision of the arbitrator or a majority of the panel of arbitrators will be binding upon the parties and judgment in accordance with that decision may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereover. Punitive damages will not be awarded.
10. Absence of Conflict . The Executive represents and warrants that his employment by the Company as described herein will not conflict with and will not be constrained by any prior employment or consulting agreement or relationship.
11. Assignment . This Agreement and all rights under this Agreement will be binding upon and inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the parties hereto and their respective personal or legal representatives, executors, administrators, heirs, distributees, devisees, legatees, successors and assigns. This Agreement is personal in nature, and neither of the parties to this Agreement will, without the written consent of the other, assign or transfer this Agreement or any right or obligation under this Agreement to any other person or entity; except that the Company may assign this Agreement to any of its affiliates or wholly-owned subsidiaries, provided, that such assignment will not relieve the Company of its obligations hereunder.
4
12. Integration . This Agreement represents the entire agreement and understanding between the parties as to the subject matter hereof and supersede all prior or contemporaneous agreements whether written or oral. No waiver, alteration, or modification of any of the provisions of this Agreement will be binding unless in writing and signed by duly authorized representatives of the parties hereto.
13. Waiver . Failure or delay on the part of either party hereto to enforce any right, power, or privilege hereunder will not be deemed to constitute a waiver thereof. Additionally, a waiver by either party or a breach of any promise hereof by the other party will not operate as or be construed to constitute a waiver of any subsequent waiver by such other party.
14. Severability . Whenever possible, each provision of this Agreement will be interpreted in such manner as to be effective and valid under applicable law, but if any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect under any applicable law or rule in any jurisdiction, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability will not affect any other provision or any other jurisdiction, but this Agreement will be reformed, construed and enforced in such jurisdiction as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had never been contained herein.
15. Headings . The headings of the paragraphs contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and will not in any way affect the meaning or interpretation of any provision of this Agreement.
16. Applicable Law . This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal substantive laws, and not the choice of law rules, of the State of Colorado.
17. Counterparts . This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, none of which need contain the signature of more than one party hereto, and each of which will be deemed to be an original, and all of which together will constitute a single agreement.
[signature page follows]
5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has executed this Agreement, in the case of the Company by its duly authorized officer, as of the Effective Date.
COMPANY: |
ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Matthew Foster |
|
Name: |
Matthew B. Foster |
|
Title: |
President and CEO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Prem Nath |
|
|
Prem Nath |
6
Exhibit 10.5
EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
THIS EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this Agreement ) is entered into as of November 27th, 2006 (the Effective Date ), by and between Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company ), and Joseph C. McCabe (the Executive ).
RECITALS
A. The Company desires to employ and retain the unique experience, abilities, and services of the Executive as Vice President of Business Development.
B. The Executive agrees to perform the services of Vice President of Business Development for the Company in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the respective covenants and agreements of the parties contained in this Agreement, the Company and Executive agree as follows:
1. Term . The term of this Agreement is for three (3) years, commencing on January 1, 2007 (the Start Date ), unless amended by agreement of the parties or terminated as set forth in Section 5.
2. Duties . The Executive will devote his full business time, energies and best efforts to the promotion of the business and affairs of the Company, with responsibility to perform such duties as are specified from time to time by the Board of Directors of the Company (the Board ) and/or the chief executive officer of the Company (the CEO ). The Executive shall report to the CEO.
3. Compensation .
a) Base Compensation. In consideration of all services to be rendered by the Executive to the Company, the Company will pay to the Executive the base salary of $130,000 per year from the Start Date through the termination of this Agreement and any extensions of it ( Base Salary ), payable in accordance with the Companys standard payroll practices.
b) Bonus Compensation. As further compensation, the Company may pay to the Executive an annual bonus of up to fifteen percent (15%) of Base Salary, at such times and in such amounts as the Board and its Compensation Committee may determine in their discretion based on the Executives individual performance;
c) Equity Compensation . As further compensation, upon approval by the Compensation Committee of the Board, on or after the Start Date, the Company will grant the
1
Executive options to purchase up to 30,000 shares of the Companys common stock, vesting in co-equal amounts (to the extent possible) over three (3) years from the date of grant, at an exercise price equal to the closing price of the Companys common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market on the date of grant. The options shall be governed by and issued under the Companys 2005 Stock Option Plan.
d) Vacation. The Executive will receive three (3) weeks of paid vacation for each contract year of this Agreement, commencing on the Start Date. Vacation will be prorated in the event of termination pursuant to Section 5. The Executive will not be entitled to carry over accrued but unused vacation from one contract year to the next.
e) Relocation Expenses . The Company will reimburse the Executive for all reasonable and documented moving expenses (including taxes paid by the Executive as part of receiving such reimbursement) incurred in connection with the relocation of the Executive and his immediate family members to Littleton, Colorado or its environs. In connection with such relocation, the Company also will reimburse the Executive for reasonable and documented costs incurred for temporary housing for up to two (2) weeks while the Executive searches for permanent housing.
f) Benefit Plans . To the extent permitted by law and except as otherwise may be determined by the Board, the Executive will be eligible to participate in the Companys standard benefit plans according to plan provisions.
4. Confidential Information .
a) Company Information. Executive agrees at all times during the term of his employment and thereafter, to hold in strictest confidence, and not to use, except for the benefit of the Company, or to disclose to any person, firm or corporation without written authorization of the Board of Directors of the Company, any Confidential Information (as defined below) of the Company. For purposes of this Agreement Confidential Information is defined as any Company proprietary information, technical data, trade secrets or know-how, including, but not limited to, research, product plans, products, services, customer lists and customers, markets, software, developments, inventions, processes, formulas, technology, designs, drawings, engineering, hardware configuration information, marketing, finances or other business information disclosed to Executive by the Company either directly or indirectly in writing, orally or by drawings or observation of parts or equipment. Confidential Information does not include any of the foregoing items which has become publicly known and made generally available through no wrongful act of Executive or of others who were under confidentiality obligations as to the item or items involved.
b) Former Employer Information. Executive agrees that he will not, during his employment with the Company, improperly use or disclose any proprietary information or trade secrets of any former or concurrent employer or other person or entity and that he will not bring onto the premises of the Company any unpublished document or proprietary information belonging to any such employer, person or entity unless consented to in writing by such employer, person or entity.
2
c) Third Party Information. Executive recognizes that the Company has received and in the future will receive from third parties their confidential or proprietary information subject to a duty on the Companys part to maintain the confidentiality of such information and to use it only for certain limited purposes. Executive agrees to hold all such confidential or proprietary information in the strictest confidence and not to disclose it to any person, firm or corporation or to use it except as necessary in carrying out his work for the Company consistent with the Companys agreement with such third party.
5. Termination of Employment .
a) Termination for Cause. Notwithstanding any provision contained in this Agreement to the contrary, the Company may immediately terminate this Agreement for Cause (as defined below) without giving notice or compensation to the Executive. For purposes of this Agreement Cause includes but is not limited to the following: (i) the conviction of the Executive or a pleading of guilty or nolo contendere to any felony or misdemeanor, or any crime involving moral turpitude, (ii) a material breach by Executive of his obligations under this Agreement, which will include a failure to perform such duties as are reasonably assigned to the Executive by the Board, (iii) any act by Executive of disloyalty to the Company, or (iv) any violation of Executives fiduciary duties to the Company.
b) Termination Without Cause. Either the Company or the Executive may terminate this Agreement without Cause on giving not less than 30 days prior written notice to the other party.
c) Disability. Unless prohibited by applicable law, this Agreement may be terminated if the Executive suffers a Permanent Disability (as defined below). For purposes of this Agreement, Permanent Disability is defined as the Executives inability, due to illness, accident, or other cause, to perform the majority of his usual duties for a period of three (3) months or more despite reasonable accommodation by the Company.
d) Death. If the Executive dies, this Agreement will automatically terminate.
6. Compensation Upon Termination .
a) Termination for Cause. If the Executive is terminated for Cause pursuant to Section 5(a), the Company will pay the Executive only his Base Salary accrued through the date of termination.
b) Termination Without Cause. If the Executive is terminated without Cause pursuant to Section 5(b), the Company will pay the Executive his Base Salary for a period of six (6) months after the date of termination.
c) Disability. During any period that the Executive fails to perform his duties and responsibilities hereunder as a result of incapacity due to physical or mental illness, the Executive will continue to receive his Base Salary until the Executives employment is
3
terminated pursuant to Section 5(c) and thereafter the Executive will receive any disability insurance benefits to which the Executive is entitled.
d) Death. If this Agreement terminates due to the death of the Executive, then any interests that the Executive may have under the provisions of this Agreement will be payable to the Executives estate inclusive of Base Salary provided for in this Agreement as if the Executive terminated his employment without Cause.
7. Board Approval . No part of this Agreement will be effective or binding upon the parties unless and until approved or ratified by the Compensation Committee of the Board.
8. Successors . The Company will require any successor (whether direct or indirect, by purchase, merger, consolidation or otherwise) to all or substantially all of the business and/or assets of the Company to expressly assume and agree to perform this Agreement in the same manner and to the same extent that the Company would be required to perform it if no such succession had taken place.
9. Arbitration . Any dispute or controversy arising under or in connection with this Agreement will be settled exclusively by arbitration in Denver, Colorado, in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association then in effect by an arbitrator selected by both parties within 10 days after either party has notified the other in writing that it desires a dispute between them to be settled by arbitration. In the event the parties cannot agree on such arbitrator within such 10-day period, each party will select an arbitrator and inform the other party in writing of such arbitrators name and address within 5 days after the end of such 10-day period and the two arbitrators so selected will select a third arbitrator within 15 days thereafter; provided, however, that in the event of a failure by either party to select an arbitrator and notify the other party of such selection within the time period provided above, the arbitrator selected by the other party will be the sole arbitrator of the dispute. Each party will pay its own expenses associated with such arbitration, including the expense of any arbitrator selected by such party and the Company will pay the expenses of the jointly selected arbitrator. The decision of the arbitrator or a majority of the panel of arbitrators will be binding upon the parties and judgment in accordance with that decision may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereover. Punitive damages will not be awarded.
10. Absence of Conflict . The Executive represents and warrants that his employment by the Company as described herein will not conflict with and will not be constrained by any prior employment or consulting agreement or relationship.
11. Assignment . This Agreement and all rights under this Agreement will be binding upon and inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the parties hereto and their respective personal or legal representatives, executors, administrators, heirs, distributees, devisees, legatees, successors and assigns. This Agreement is personal in nature, and neither of the parties to this Agreement will, without the written consent of the other, assign or transfer this Agreement or any right or obligation under this Agreement to any other person or entity; except that the Company may assign this Agreement to any of its affiliates or wholly-owned subsidiaries, provided, that such assignment will not relieve the Company of its obligations hereunder.
4
12. Integration . This Agreement represents the entire agreement and understanding between the parties as to the subject matter hereof and supersede all prior or contemporaneous agreements whether written or oral. No waiver, alteration, or modification of any of the provisions of this Agreement will be binding unless in writing and signed by duly authorized representatives of the parties hereto.
13. Waiver . Failure or delay on the part of either party hereto to enforce any right, power, or privilege hereunder will not be deemed to constitute a waiver thereof. Additionally, a waiver by either party or a breach of any promise hereof by the other party will not operate as or be construed to constitute a waiver of any subsequent waiver by such other party.
14. Severability . Whenever possible, each provision of this Agreement will be interpreted in such manner as to be effective and valid under applicable law, but if any provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect under any applicable law or rule in any jurisdiction, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability will not affect any other provision or any other jurisdiction, but this Agreement will be reformed, construed and enforced in such jurisdiction as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had never been contained herein.
15. Headings . The headings of the paragraphs contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and will not in any way affect the meaning or interpretation of any provision of this Agreement.
16. Applicable Law . This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal substantive laws, and not the choice of law rules, of the State of Colorado.
17. Counterparts . This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, none of which need contain the signature of more than one party hereto, and each of which will be deemed to be an original, and all of which together will constitute a single agreement.
[signature page follows]
5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has executed this Agreement, in the case of the Company by its duly authorized officer, as of the Effective Date.
COMPANY: |
ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Matthew Foster |
|
Name: |
Matthew B. Foster |
|
Title: |
President and CEO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Joseph McCabe 11/28/06 |
|
|
Joseph C. McCabe |
6
Exhibit 10.23
Novation Agreement
ITN Energy Systems, Inc. (Transferor), a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of Colorado with its principal office in Littleton, Colorado; Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. (Transferee), a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of Delaware with its principal office in Littleton, Colorado; and the United States of America (Government) enter into this Novation Agreement (Agreement) January 1, 2007.
(a) The parties agree to the following facts:
(1) The Government, represented by various Contracting Officers of the Airforce Research Laboratory Phillips Research Site has entered into certain contracts with the Transferor, as shown in the attached list marked Exhibit A and incorporated in this Agreement by Reference. The term the contracts, as used in this Agreement, means the above contracts and purchase orders including all modifications thereto, made between the Government and the Transferor before the effective date of this Agreement (whether or not performance and payment have been completed and releases executed if the Government or the Transferor has any remaining rights, duties, or obligations under these contracts and purchase orders). Included in the term the contracts are also all modifications made under the terms and conditions of these contracts and purchase orders between the Government and the Transferee, on or after the effective date of this Agreement.
(2) As of January 17, 2006, the Transferor has transferred to the Transferee certain intellectual property assets of the Transferor by virtue of an Assignment between the Transferor and the Transferee. Effective January 1, 2007, all employees of the Transferor who are working on the contracts will become employees of the transferee.
(3) The Transferee has acquired all said assets and personnel of the Transferor by virtue of the above transfer.
(4) The Transferee has assumed all obligations and liabilities of the Transferor under the contracts by virtue of the above transfer.
(5) The Transferee is in a position to fully perform all obligations that may exist under the contracts.
(6) It is consistent with the Governments interest to recognize the Transferee as the successor party to the contracts.
(7) Evidence of the above transfer has been filed with the Government.
(b) In consideration of these facts, the parties agree that by this agreement
(1) The Transferor confirms the transfer to the Transferee, and waives any claims and rights against the Government that it now has or may have in the future in connection with the contracts.
(2) The Transferee agrees to be bound by and to perform each contract in accordance with the conditions contained in the contracts. The Transferee also assumes all obligations and liabilities of, and all claims against, the Transferor under the contracts as if the Transferee were the original party to the contracts.
(3) The Transferee ratifies all previous actions taken by the Transferor with respect to the contracts, with the same force and effect as if the action had been taken by the Transferee.
(4) The Government recognizes the Transferee as the Transferors successor in interest in and to the contracts. The Transferee by this Agreement becomes entitled to all rights, titles, and interests of the Transferor in and to the contracts as if the Transferee were the original party to the contracts. Following the effective date of this Agreement, the term Contractor, as used in the contracts, shall refer to the Transferee.
(5) Except as expressly provided in this Agreement, nothing in it shall be construed as a waiver of any rights of the Government against the Transferor.
(6) All payments and reimbursements previously made by the Government to the Transferor, and all other previous actions taken by the Government under the contracts, shall be considered to have discharged those parts of the Governments obligations under the contracts. All payments and reimbursements made by the Government after the date of this Agreement in the name of or to the Transferor shall have the same force and effect as if made to the Transferee, and shall constitute a complete discharge of the Governments obligations under the contracts, to the extent of the amounts paid or reimbursed.
(7) The Transferor and the Transferee agree that the Government is not obligated to pay or reimburse either of them for, or otherwise give effect to, any costs, taxes, or other expenses, or any related increases, directly or indirectly arising out of or resulting from the transfer or this Agreement, other than those that the Government in the absence of this transfer or Agreement would have been obligated to pay or reimburse under the terms of the contracts.
(8) The Transferor guarantees payment of all liabilities and the performance of all obligations that the Transferee
(i) Assumes under this Agreement; or
(ii) May undertake in the future should these contracts be modified under their terms and conditions. The Transferor waives notice of, and consents to, any such future modifications.
(9) The contracts shall remain in full force and effect, except as modified by this Agreement. Each party has executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.
|
|
United States of America, |
|
|
|
|
By |
/s/ Elizabeth Kerr-White |
|
|
Elizabeth Kerr-White |
|
Title |
Administrative Contracting Officer |
|
|
ITN Energy Systems, Inc., |
|
|
|
|
By |
/s/ R. Scott Burrows |
|
Title |
Secretary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
By |
/s/ Janet Casteel |
|
Title |
Chief Accounting Officer/Treasurer |
Certificate
I, R. Scott Burrows, certify that I am the Secretary of ITN Energy Systems, Inc.; that R. Scott Burrows, who signed this Agreement for this corporation, was then Secretary of this corporation; and that this Agreement was duly signed for and on behalf of this corporation by authority of its governing body and within the scope of its corporate powers. Witness my hand and the seal of this corporation this 1st day of January 2007.
By |
|
/s/ R. Scott Burrows |
|
|
Certificate
I, Janet Casteel, certify that I am the Treasurer of Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc., that Janet Casteel, who signed this Agreement for this corporation, was then Treasurer of this corporation; and that this Agreement was duly signed for and on behalf of this corporation by authority of its governing body and within the scope of its corporate powers. Witness my hand and the seal of this corporation this 1st day of January 2007.
By |
|
/s/ Janet Casteel |
|
|
Exhibit A
ITN Contracts requesting to be novated to AST 1/01/07
Updated 11/29/06 All Contracts Other than SBIR/STTRs
Job Code
|
|
Subject Area |
|
Customer |
|
Address of Contracting Office |
|
Principal
|
|
Contract No. |
|
Contract
|
|
Period of
|
|
Total Contract
|
|
Total Backlog
|
BAA SILICONE SUB |
|
High Specific Power CIS-Alloy PV on Silicone Substrate Modules |
|
AFRL |
|
Air Force Research Laboratory (Det 8) 2251 Maxwell Avenue, SE Kirtland AFB, NM 87117-5773 Attn: Rinda L. Kearney |
|
Lawrence Woods |
|
FA9453-05-C-0256 |
|
CPFF |
|
11/4/05-1/31/07 with contract completion 4/04/07* |
|
$925,283 |
|
$852,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Contracts Other than SBIR/STTRs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$925,283 |
|
$852,239 |
SBIR/STTR Contracts
Job Code
|
|
Subject Area |
|
Client |
|
Address of Contracting Office |
|
Principal
|
|
Contract No. |
|
Contract
|
|
Period of
|
|
Total Contract
|
|
Total Backlog
|
CIGASNASA2 |
|
CulnGalSe2 solar absorbers on flexible high-temperature substrates |
|
AFRL |
|
NASA Glenn Research Center Technology Support Branch 21000 Brookpark Road, Mail Stop 500-306 Cleveland, OH 44135-3191 Attn: Marilyn D. Stotz |
|
Lawrence Woods |
|
NNC06-CA11C |
|
FP |
|
12/1/05-12/1/07 |
|
$596,928 |
|
$392,566 |
BOTTOMCELL2 |
|
Enabling Durable Bottom Cell for Multi-Junction Thin-Film Photovoltaics |
|
AFRL |
|
Air Force Research Laboratory (Det 8) 2251 Maxwell Avenue, SE Kirtland AFB, NM 87117-5773 Attn: Sally M. Walton |
|
Lawrence Woods |
|
FA9453-03-C-0216 |
|
CPFF |
|
10/30/03-3/17/07 with contract completion 6/18/07** |
|
$1,234,093 |
|
$253,466 |
PASSIVATION2 |
|
Defect Passivation for Production-Quality and High Bandgap CIGS and CIAS Solar Cells |
|
AFRL |
|
Air Force Research Laboratory (Det 8) 2251 Maxwell Avenue, SE Kirtland AFB, NM 87117-5773 Attn: Sally M. Walton |
|
Garth Jensen |
|
FA9453-05-C-0036 |
|
CPFF |
|
4/29/05-4/30/07 with contract completion 7/30/07*** |
|
$749,459 |
|
$305,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SBIR/STTR Contracts Subtotal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$2,580,480 |
|
$951,811 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ALL CONTRACTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$3,505,763 |
|
$1,804,050 |
* Additional approx. $830,000 currently being added to contract with an extension to July 2006 for technical performance
** No cost extension request anticipated for technical performance to 6/18/07.
*** No cost extension request anticipated for technical performance to 7/30/07.
Exhibit 10.24
AMENDMENT
TO
SERVICE CENTER AGREEMENT
Amendment, dated as of November 10, 2006, between Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (AST), and ITN Energy Systems, Inc., a Colorado corporation (ITN), to that certain Service Center Agreement (Service Center Agreement), dated as of January 17, 2006, between AST and ITN.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, ITN has requested approval from the Defense Contract Management Agency, DCMA Space & Missile Systems Division (DCMA) to novate its existing CIGS PV contracts with DCMA to AST and from the Naval Surface Warfare Center Crane Division (NSWC) to novate its existing CIGS PV Contracts with NSWC to AST (such currently existing contracts with DCMA and NSWC are collectively referred to herein as DCMA and NSWC Contracts); and
WHEREAS, to satisfy any concerns that DCMA and NSWC may have that the Equipment (as defined in the Service Center Agreement) that ITN has agreed to make available for use by AST might not be available to AST for performance of the DCMA and NSWC Contracts, AST and ITN have agreed to amend the Service Center Agreement as set forth below.
Accordingly, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:
1. Section 1 of the Service Center Agreement is hereby amended to read in full as follows:
1. Service Center Agreement . Upon the terms and conditions set forth herein, ITN will allow AST to use certain of ITNs laboratories, laboratory equipment and research and development tools and equipment (collectively Equipment), on an as needed basis, but subject to ITNs right of first use. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event AST needs to use the Equipment in order to perform its obligations under the DCMA Contracts, then the parties agree to work out a mutually acceptable schedule so that ASTs need for the Equipment under the DCMA Contracts and ITNs need for the Equipment can each be accommodated without the other party having the right of first use.
2. All other terms and conditions of the Service Center Agreement shall remain the same.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first stated above.
|
ITN Energy Systems, Inc. a Colorado corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Ashutosh Misra |
|
Name: |
Ashutosh Misra |
|
Title: |
Executive Vice President |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Matthew Foster |
|
Name: |
Matthew Foster |
|
Title: |
President |
Exhibit 10.25
AMENDMENT
TO
SUBLEASE AGREEMENT
Amendment, dated as of January 1, 2007, between ITN Energy Systems, Inc., a Colorado corporation (Sublessor), and Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (Sublessee), to that certain Sublease Agreement (Sublease Agreement), effective as of November 1, 2005, between Sublessor and Sublessee.
RECITALS
A. Sublessee currently leases from Sublessor a portion of the premises (Leased Premises) leased to Sublessor by that certain Office/R&D Lease, dated effective as of November 30, 2000, between ARA Building, L.L.C. as Lessor and Sublessor as Lessee.
B. Sublessee desires to increase the space in the Leased Premises that it is subleasing from Sublessor, and Sublessor is willing to increase the space it is subleasing to Sublessee, so that the aggregate amount subleased to Sublessee from the Leased Premises equals approximately 14,244 rentable square feet, being that portion of the building depicted on the map attached hereto as Schedule 1 (the New Subleased Premises).
Accordingly, the parties hereto do hereby agree to amend the Sublease Agreement as follows:
1. Section 1 of the Sublease Agreement is hereby amended to provide that the premises subleased thereunder are the New Subleased Premises, and the term Subleased Premises when used in the Sublease Agreement shall for all purposes be interpreted to mean the New Subleased Premises.
2. Section 4 of the Sublease Agreement is hereby amended to provide that the rent from 1/1/07 to 6/30/07 is increased to $17,211 per month, the rent from 7/1/07 to 6/30/10 is increased to $18,991 per month, and the total rent payable under the
Sublease Agreement is nine hundred thirty thousand and twenty dollars ($930,920). The provisions on pass-through expenses, and Sublessees obligations to pay the same, shall remain the same though based on the New Subleased Premises.
3. Sublessee understands and agrees that the equipment (Equipment) listed on Schedule 2 attached hereto may be kept by Sublessor on the New Subleased Premises at their current location without charge to Sublessor. Sublessee grants Sublessor, its employees, agents, contractors and invitees the non-exclusive right of ingress and egress to, through, in and on the New Subleased Premises as needed from time-to-time by Sublessor in order to use, repair or otherwise take action with respect to the Equipment; provided that this right shall not permit Sublessor, its employees, agents, contractors or invitees access to those portions of the New Subleased Premises which are designated by Sublessee as restricted areas accessible to Sublessees employees only due to the need to protect and secure its trade secrets and those portions of its operation which are of a sensitive nature. Use of the Equipment by Sublessor on the New Subleased Premises shall be at Sublessors sole risk. Sublessor hereby waives and releases Sublessee from and against any and all claims, damages, losses, liabilities, costs and expenses (collectively Liabilities) arising from Sublessors use of any of the Equipment on the New Subleased Premises. Sublessor shall indemnify, defend and hold Sublessee harmless from and against any and all Liabilities, including without limitation from and against reasonable attorneys fees, which may be incurred by or asserted against Sublessee for any losses, injuries, death or other damages suffered by Sublessor or its employees agents, contractors or invitees using any portion of the Equipment on the New Subleased Premises. Sublessee acknowledges and agrees that Sublessor and its employees, agents, contractors and invitees have the absolute right to, and are given the right of ingress and egress to, through, in and on the New Subleased Premises in order to, remove the Equipment from the New Subleased Premises; provided, however, Sublessor shall repair any damage to the New Subleased Premises occasioned by such removal.
4. All other terms and conditions of the Sublease shall remain the same.
2
IN WITNESS WHREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to Sublease as of the date first above written.
|
SUBLESSOR: |
||
|
|
|
|
|
ITN Energy Systems, Inc. |
||
|
a Colorado corporation |
||
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Ashutosh Misra |
|
|
Its: |
Executive Vice President |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUBLESSEE: |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc., |
||
|
a Delaware corporation |
||
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Janet Casteel |
|
|
Its: |
Chief Accounting Officer |
|
3
CONSENT OF LESSOR
The undersigned Lessor under that certain Office/R&D Lease, effective as of November 30, 2000, between ARA Building, L.L.C. as lessor and ITN Energy Systems, Inc. as lessee (the Primary Lease) hereby consents to the foregoing Amendment to Sublease Agreement and the subletting of the New Subleased Premises as described therein. This consent shall only apply to the Amendment to Sublease Agreement and the subletting of the New Subleased Premises and shall not be deemed to constitute consent to any other sublease or subletting of the Leased Premises (as defined in the Primary Lease).
LESSOR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Matthew B. Foster |
|
|
|
|
4
Schedule 1
NEW SUBLEASED PREMISES
(MAP OF BUILDING)
Total Square Footage of 8120 Shaffer Parkway |
|
18,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
Square Footage Subleased to AST |
|
14,244 |
|
Remaining Square Footage ITN |
|
4,537 |
|
Schedule 2
Equipment owned by ITN Energy Systems, Inc. and
Physically located on subleased premises of Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.
1. Lab Equipment located in room 122
Solar Simulator/Characterization Equipment
6
THIS CONSULTING AGREEMENT (the Agreement) is entered into by and between Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.(AST), and Ashutosh Misra with an address of 16430 W. Ellsworth Avenue, Golden, CO 80401 (Consultant). AST and Consultant may be referred to collectively herein as the Parties or individually as a Party.
RECITALS
Consultant desires to perform for AST and AST desires to have Consultant perform the certain services as an independent contractor.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises and covenants contained below, the parties agree as follows:
1. Provision of Services . Acting as an independent contractor, Consultant agrees to perform the services listed in Exhibit A attached hereto (the Services). In providing the Services, Consultant shall report to Matt Foster or any other representative subsequently designated by AST. Consultant shall use his best efforts and the highest professional standards in providing the Services which shall be performed to ASTs reasonable satisfaction.
2. Compensation . AST will compensate Consultant for Services performed in compliance with his Agreement and Exhibit A hereto a monthly charge of $8,500. Consultant shall invoice AST every two weeks ($4,250) for Services performed and any approved expenses incurred pursuant to the provision of Services as set forth in Section 4 hereof. Consultant agrees that except as expressly set forth in this Section 2, Consultant shall not be entitled to any payments, reimbursements, or compensation of any kind from AST for services rendered.
3. Reimbursement for Expenses . Consultant is not authorized to incur any expenses on behalf of AST without prior consent of AST. All invoices submitted by Consultant for Services and expenses shall be in the form prescribed by AST and shall be approved by the individual to whom Consultant reports, named in Section 1, or that persons supervisor. During the term of this Agreement, AST shall reimburse Consultant for all reasonable approved expenses incurred by Consultant .
4. Term and Termination . This Agreement shall commence on February 19, 2007 and shall terminate on December 31, 2007 unless sooner terminated as provided herein. AST or Consultant may terminate this Agreement with or without cause by giving 10 days written notice to the other party. AST may immediately terminate this Agreement in the event Consultant breaches any provision contained herein or in Exhibit A attached hereto. This Agreement may be renewable for consecutive one year terms upon written agreement between the parties.
5. Taxes . Consultant shall be solely responsible for payment of all taxes and/or
1
assessments imposed on the payment of compensation for the performance of the Services including, without limitation, any Colorado unemployment insurance or tax, any federal, state and foreign income taxes, and any federal social security payments (FICA).
6. Restrictive Covenants. Consultant agrees, for the Term of this Agreement, to refrain from working with any company, or other entity which is engaged in any business competitive with that of AST.
7. No Solicitation . Consultant agrees, for the term of this Agreement, and for a period of one (1) year thereafter, directly or indirectly, individually or on behalf of any other person or entity, to refrain from soliciting, employing, contracting or interfering with any of ASTs relationships with, or enticing away from company, any employee, customer, licensee, distributor, vendor or other source of supply of AST.
8. No Breach . Consultants entering into this Agreement and performing the obligations hereunder shall not result in a breach, default or violation of any agreement to which Consultant is a party or otherwise bound.
9. Return of Data . If requested by AST during the term of this Agreement or thereafter, Consultant shall promptly return any and all AST property that has come into Consultants possession. Upon termination of this Agreement for any reason, Consultant shall, within ten (10) days of such termination and in accordance with any instructions provided by AST, return to AST any and all tangible AST property that has come into Consultants possession, including all copies thereof and any notes, memoranda, and other documents or other media relating thereto. Consultant shall not remove any AST property from AST premises without written authorization from AST. The product of all work performed under this Agreement, including reports, drawings, computer programs, data, devices or models, shall be the property of AST, and AST shall have the sole right to use, sell, license, publish or otherwise disseminate or transfer rights of such work product.
10. Relationship . During the term of this Agreement, Independent Contractor shall be a self-employed independent contractor with respect to performing Services for AST and not an agent or employee of AST.
11. Confidentiality. The Parties acknowledge that this Agreement and any rights and obligations arising hereunder shall be conditioned on Consultant executing a Confidentiality Agreement in form of Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
12. Remedies . Consultant acknowledges that compliance with Sections 10 and 12 is necessary to protect ASTs business and goodwill and that a breach of any of these provisions will irreparably and continually damage AST, for which money damages may not be adequate. In the event that Consultant breaches or threatens to breach Sections 10 and 12 of this Agreement, Consultant shall forfeit its rights to receive payments under Section 2 herein. In addition, AST shall also be entitled to preliminarily or permanently enjoin Consultant from violating this Agreement to
2
prevent the continuation of harm and obtain money damages insofar as they can be determined. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to prohibit AST from also pursuing any other remedy available to it, the parties having agreed that all remedies are to be cumulative.
13. Inventions/Patents . Consultant shall promptly communicate to AST all inventions made or conceived by Consultant in connection with Services performed for AST, and without further consideration Consultant assigns all right, title and interest in such inventions to AST and shall assist AST and its nominees in every proper way, entirely at ASTs expense, to obtain, maintain and defend for ASTs own benefit, patent, trademark, copyright, trade secret, or other legal protection in all countries, the inventions to be and to remain the property of AST or its nominees whether patented or not. Consultant shall, at ASTs request, execute any and all instruments and documents which AST may deem necessary or expedient to assign and convey to AST, its successors, assigns or nominees, the sole and exclusive right, title and interest in and to any such inventions, discoveries, innovations, work products and developments, together with the instruments and documents deemed necessary or expedient by AST in order to apply for, obtain, and maintain patents and copyrights of the United States and foreign countries therefor, in full compliance with applicable requirements.
14. Copyrights. Consultant, without further consideration, assigns all right, title and interest in any copyrightable material created in connection with this Agreement to AST and shall assist AST and its nominees in every proper way, entirely at ASTs expense, to secure, maintain and defend for ASTs own benefit, copyrights and any extensions and renewals thereof on any and all such material including translations thereof in any and all countries, such material to be and to remain the property of AST whether copyrighted or not. All materials produced by Consultant under this Agreement shall be considered work made for hire.
15. Warranty/License . With respect to all subject matter including ideas, processes, designs and methods which Consultant shall disclose or use in the performance of this Agreement: (i) as an independent contractor, Consultant warrants to company that Consultant has the right to make disclosure and use thereof without liability to others; (ii) to the extent that Consultant has patent applications, patents or other rights in the subject matter, Consultant hereby grants AST, its subsidiaries and affiliates a royalty-free, irrevocable, world-wide, non-exclusive license to make, have made, sell, use and disclose such subject matter,; and (iii) Consultant agrees to hold AST harmless for use of subject matter which Consultant knows or reasonably should know others have rights in, except, however, for subject matter and the identity others having rights in it that Consultant discloses to AST in writing before AST uses the subject matter.
16. Prevention of Damage . Consultant further agrees that he shall take such steps as may be reasonably necessary to prevent personal injury or property damage during any work hereunder that may be performed by any employees, agents, or subcontracts of the Consultant at the ASTs location, and Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless AST from and against all loss, liability, and damages arising from or caused directly or indirectly by any act or omission of Consultant and/or such agents, employees or subcontractors of Consultant.
3
17. Indemnity . Consultant shall indemnify AST from and against any and all claims, losses, damages (including legal fees and costs), arising from any non-fulfillment of Consultants covenants in this Agreement. Consultant agrees to protect, indemnify and save harmless, AST, and its affiliates, subsidiaries, officers, directors, employees, agents and contractors, on demand, from any and all allegations, suits, claims, liability, loss, damage, judgments, cost or expense (including attorneys fees) arising directly or indirectly from Consultants presence at the facilities, use of the facilities of AST or from Consultants breach of this Agreement. Consultant further agrees to notify AST in writing regarding any such allegation, suit or claim, liability, loss, damage, or breach and, upon notice from AST, to promptly and diligently prosecute, resist, and defend the same.
18. Miscellaneous
18.1 Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto regarding the subject matter hereof and supersedes all oral or written agreements concerning the said subject matter. This Agreement may not be modified except by written agreement signed by both Parties.
18.2 Assignment. Consultant shall not assign or transfer any rights or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of AST. Subject to the limitations set forth herein, this Agreement will inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the Parties, their permitted successors and assigns.
18.3 Presumptions. In construing the terms of this Agreement, no presumption shall operate in either Partys favor as a result of its counsels role in drafting the terms or provisions hereof.
18.4 Governing Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the United States and the State of Colorado without regard to the choice of law provisions thereof. Venue for any and all disputes arising out of or under this Agreement shall be in a court of competent jurisdiction in the State of Colorado, County of Jefferson.
18.5 Severability, Waiver . If any provision of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect. Either partys failure to insist in any one or more instances upon strict performance by the other party of any of the terms of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of any continuing or subsequent failure to perform or delay in performance of any term hereof.
18.6 Notices. Any notice required by this Agreement or given in connection with it, shall be in writing and shall be given to the appropriate party by personal delivery or by certified mail, postage prepaid, or recognized overnight delivery services.
If to Owner: |
|
If to Recipient: |
|
|
|
Ascent Solar Technolgies, Inc. |
|
Ashutosh Misra |
8120 Shaffer Parkway |
|
16430 W. Ellsworth Avenue |
4
Littleton, CO 80127 |
|
Golden, CO 80401 |
18.7 Headings. Headings used in this Agreement are provided for convenience only and shall not be used to construe meaning or intent.
18.8 Release . Consultant acknowledges the risks and hazards inherent upon entering ASTs facilities and hereby voluntarily assumes all risks of personal or property loss, damage or injury (including death) that may be sustained by Consultant or its employees while in or on any AST facility and hereby releases AST, its affiliates, subsidiaries, officers, directors, employees, agents and contractors from any and all liability, claims, demands and causes of action whatsoever arising out of or related to any loss, damage or injury (including death) that may be sustained by the Consultant, its employees or property while in or on the facilities owned by, leased by, leased to or under contract or control of AST. This release and shall be binding upon the distributees, heirs, executors and administrators, successors and assigns of Consultant and its employees.
18.9 Inability to Contract For AST . Consultant shall not have the right or the authority to make any contracts or commitments for or on behalf of AST without first obtaining the express written consent of AST.
18.9 . Survival . Consultant agrees that the provisions of Sections 10 and 12 hereof shall survive termination of this Agreement and shall be fully enforceable thereafter.
ACCEPTED AND AGREED :
ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. |
CONSULTANT |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Matthew B. Foster |
|
By: |
/s/ Ashutosh Misra |
|
|
|
|
|
Title: |
President & CEO |
|
Title: |
Not Applicable |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: |
February 19, 2007 |
|
Date: |
February 19, 2007 |
5
Exhibit A
Scope of Work to be Performed by Consultant
General consulting with regard to financial matters, including but not limited to funding
Minimum of 20 hours per week
6
Exhibit B
Confidentiality Agreement
CONSULTANT NONDISCLOSURE AGREEMENT
This Consultant Nondisclosure Agreement (Agreement) is made and entered into as of February 19, 2007 by and between Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (Ascent), and Ashutosh Misra (Consultant).
RECITALS
A. Ascent owns certain proprietary information which is confidential to it.
B. Consultant wishes to provide certain services to Ascent.
C. Both parties wish to enter into a consulting and services relationship which may require Ascent to share its confidential information with Consultant. Accordingly, the parties wish to enter into this Agreement to protect Ascents confidential information and to define the use and means of sharing such confidential information.
THEREFORE, in consideration of discussions between the parties, Ascent and Consultant (on behalf of itself, its agents and its representatives) hereby agreed as follows:
1. Disclosure of Information. Ascent shall disclose to Consultant certain confidential information (Confidential Information) that includes, but is not limited to, information embodied in written or electronic documents, memoranda, reports, correspondence, specifications, drawings, computer software or other media which is not generally known to others and which would be of economic value if known, and which pertains to the research, development, production and marketing of technology and products by Ascent, or to Ascents finances or business operations. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, Confidential Information shall not include any item of information which:
1.1 is within the public domain prior to the time of disclosure by Ascent; or thereafter becomes within the public domain other than as a result of disclosure by Consultant, its agents or its representatives in violation of this Agreement;
1.2 was, before the date of disclosure, in the rightful possession of Consultant, as evidenced by a writing or other document;
1.3 is acquired by Consultant from a third party not under an obligation of confidentiality to Ascent.
7
Any item of information that Consultant reasonably believes falls into categories 1.2 or 1.3 above will only be exempted from the scope of Confidential Information if Consultant promptly notifies Ascent in writing upon its discovery of the facts leading to its belief.
2. Use of Information . The Confidential Information shall be used by Consultant only to assist it in providing its services to and carrying out its agreed-upon work for Ascent. Consultant shall not use the Confidential Information for any other purpose. Consultant may disclose the Confidential Information only to such of its officers, directors, shareholders, employees and agents as shall be reasonably necessary to accomplish the foregoing purpose, and only if those persons are subject to confidentiality obligations of similar scope. The Confidential Information shall remain the property of Ascent, and shall be returned to Ascent upon termination of the consulting relationship or immediately upon request. Nothing herein shall be construed as giving Consultant any license or rights with respect to the Confidential Information.
3. Confidentiality . Consultant acknowledges that the Confidential Information is a valuable, proprietary and confidential asset of Ascent. Consultant, for itself and for its affiliates, officers, directors, shareholders, employees and agents, agrees that, unless Ascent has given its prior written consent, it shall not disclose any such Confidential Information received from Ascent to any other person, firm, corporation, association, partnership or other entity for any reason or purpose whatsoever except as contemplated herein. Consultant agrees to exercise reasonable care in safeguarding the Confidential Information against loss, theft, or other inadvertent disclosure and agrees generally to take all reasonable steps necessary to maintain confidentiality. Consultant shall: (i) restrict access to the Confidential Information to those employees and agents who need to have access to it; (ii) inform such employees and agents of the confidential nature of the information; and (iii) inform such employees and agents of, and obligate them to abide by, the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
4. Remedies . In the event of the breach or threatened breach by Consultant of this Agreement, Ascent shall be entitled to seek injunctive relief, both preliminary and permanent, enjoining and restraining such breach or threatened breach. Such remedy shall be in addition to all of the remedies available to Ascent at law or in equity, including the right to recover any and all damages that may be sustained as a result of the breach. In addition to any other remedies available under this Agreement, Ascent shall also be entitled to recover by means of an accounting any profits that Consultant may have obtained as a result of such breach or threatened breach.
5. No Obligation of Parties to Proceed; Survival . This Agreement does not create any obligation on the part of either party to proceed with any business relationship that is the subject of discussions between the parties. This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect notwithstanding the termination of negotiations between the parties or the entry into a business relationship by the parties.
6. Attorney Fees . In the event of any dispute or breach under this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled, whether or not any action or arbitration is instituted, to recover from the other party its reasonable costs, disbursements and attorney fees, including without limitation at trial, on appeal, on denial of any petition for review, and in connection with enforcement of any judgment.
8
7. Governing Law; Exclusive Venue . This Agreement and disputes arising under it shall be governed by the laws of the State of Colorado, without regard for conflicts of law principles. Exclusive venue and jurisdiction over disputes arising under this Agreement shall be in any federal or state court sitting in Denver County or Arapahoe County, Colorado, and the parties hereby agree and consent to such venue and jurisdiction.
8. Entire Agreement . This Agreement is the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter and supersedes all prior or contemporaneous oral or written communications or agreements between the parties. It shall not be modified in any way except in writing signed by the parties. If any part of this Agreement shall become less than fully operative, all other provisions of this Agreement shall, nevertheless, remain in full force and effect.
DATED the day and year first above written.
|
ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Matthew Foster |
|
|
Matthew Foster, President |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONSULTANT |
|
|
|
|
|
Name: |
/s/ Ashutosh Misra |
|
|
|
|
By: |
Ashutosh Misra |
|
|
|
|
Print title: |
9
Exhibit 14.1
ADOPTED OCTOBER 26, 2005
ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CODE OF ETHICS
Principals Governing Professional and Ethical Conduct
It is the policy of Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. (the Company) that the Companys Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other senior finance and accounting staff with responsibility for maintaining accounting records, preparing financial statements, preparing and filing reports with the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) and making other public communications regarding the Company adhere to, advocate and promote the following principles:
· Honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;
· Full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that the Company files with, or submits to, the SEC and other public communications made by the Company; and
· Compliance with laws, rules and regulations applicable to the Company.
The persons subject to this Code are required to acknowledge and agree to the foregoing and deliver a copy of such acknowledgement to the Companys Audit Committee. The Corporate Secretary will maintain this acknowledgement with the Companys corporate records.
Reporting and Treatment of Violations
Persons who become aware of suspected violations of this Code should report such suspected violations promptly to the Audit Committee, who will forward such report to the Companys Board of Directors. To assist in the response to or investigation of the alleged violation, the report should contain as much specific information as possible to allow for proper assessment of the nature, extent and urgency of the alleged violation. Without limiting the foregoing, the report should, to the extent possible, contain the following information:
· the alleged event, matter or issue that is the subject of the alleged violation;
· the name of each person involved;
· if the alleged violation involves a specific event or events, the approximate date and location of each event; and
· any additional information, documentation or other evidence available relating to the alleged violation.
The Audit Committee shall have the power to monitor, investigate, make determinations and recommend action to the Board of Directors with respect to violations of this Code.
In determining whether a violation of this Code has occurred, the Audit Committee may take into account:
· the nature and severity of the violation;
· whether the violation was a single occurrence or involved repeated occurrences;
· whether the violation appears to have been intentional or inadvertent;
· whether the person in question had been advised prior to the violation as to the proper course of action;
· whether the person in question had committed other violations in the past; and
· such other facts and circumstances as the Audit Committee shall deem advisable in the context of the alleged violation.
Consequences of Violations
If a violation is substantiated, the Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee, may impose such sanctions or take such actions as it deems appropriate, including, but not limited to, the following:
· disciplinary action (including censure, re-assignment, demotion, suspension or termination);
· pursuit of any and all remedies available to the Company for any damages or harm resulting from a violation, including injunctive relief; and
· referral of matters to appropriate legal or regulatory authorities for investigation and prosecution.
Requests for Waivers and Changes in Code
A waiver of a provision of this Code shall be requested whenever there is reasonable likelihood that a contemplated action will violate the Code. Any waiver (including an implicit waiver) that constitutes a material departure from a provision of this Code shall be publicly disclosed on a timely basis, to the extent required by applicable rules and regulations of the SEC. In addition, any amendments to this Code (other than technical, administrative or other non-substantive amendments) shall be publicly disclosed on a timely basis, to the extent required by applicable rules and regulations of the SEC.
2
Exhibit 31.1
ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Matthew Foster, President and Chief Executive Officer of Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2006;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 30, 2007
|
|
/s/ MATTHEW FOSTER |
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew Foster, President |
|
|
and Chief Executive Officer |
Exhibit 31.2
ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Janet L. Casteel, Chief Accounting Officer of Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2006;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 30, 2007
|
|
/s/ JANET L. CASTEEL |
|
|
|
|
|
Janet L. Casteel |
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer |
Exhibit 32.1
ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the Report), I, Matthew Foster, President, and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: March 30, 2007
|
|
/s/ MATTHEW FOSTER |
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew Foster, President and |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
Exhibit 32.2
ASCENT SOLAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the Report), I, Janet L. Casteel, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: March 30, 2007
|
|
/s/ JANET L. CASTEEL |
|
|
|
|
|
Janet L. Casteel |
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer |