UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 


 

FORM 10-K

 


 

(Mark One)

x

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

 

 

 

For the fiscal year ended April 27, 2008

 

 

OR

o

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

 

 

 

For the transition period from                   to            

 

 

Commission File Number 0-20538

 

ISLE OF CAPRI CASINOS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware

 

41-1659606

(State or other jurisdiction

of incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number)

 

 

 

600 Emerson Road, Suite 300, St. Louis, Missouri

 

63141

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(Zip Code)

 

 

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (314) 813-9200

 

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

 

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $.01 Par Value Per Share

(Title of Class)

 


 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes  o   No  x

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes  o   No  x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x   No  o

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.   x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer   o

 

Accelerated filer   x

 

 

 

Non-accelerated filer   o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

Smaller reporting company o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes  o   No  x

 

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting stock held by non-affiliates(1) of the Company is $333,184,516, based on the last reported sale price of $20.61 per share on October 26, 2007 on the NASDAQ Stock Market; multiplied by 16,166,158 shares of Common Stock outstanding and held by non-affiliates of the Company on such date.

 

As of July 8, 2008, the Company had a total of 30,857,558 shares of Common Stock outstanding (which excludes 4,372,073 shares held by us in treasury).

 


(1)                    Affiliates for the purpose of this item refer to the directors, named executive officers and/or persons owning 10% or more of the Company’s common stock, both of record and beneficially; however, this determination does not constitute an admission of affiliate status for any of the individual stockholders.

 



 

Part III incorporates information by reference to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year.

 



 

ISLE OF CAPRI CASINOS, INC.

FORM 10-K

INDEX

 

 

 

PAGE

PART I

 

2

 

 

 

ITEM 1.

BUSINESS

2

 

 

 

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

9

 

 

 

ITEM 1B.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

15

 

 

 

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES

15

 

 

 

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

19

 

 

 

ITEM 4.

SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

19

 

 

 

PART II

 

20

 

 

 

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

20

 

 

 

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

22

 

 

 

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

24

 

 

 

ITEM 7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

37

 

 

 

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

39

 

 

 

ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

75

 

 

 

ITEM 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

75

 

 

 

ITEM 9B.

OTHER INFORMATION

76

 

 

 

PART III

 

76

 

 

 

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

76

 

 

 

ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

76

 

 

 

ITEM 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

76

 

 

 

ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

76

 

 

 

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

76

 

 

 

PART IV

 

76

 

 

 

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

76

 

 

 

SIGNATURES

77

 



 

DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This report contains statements that we believe are, or may be considered to be, “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this report regarding the prospects of our industry or our prospects, plans, financial position or business strategy, may constitute forward-looking statements. In addition, forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “foresee,” “project,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “plans,” “forecasts,” “continue” or “could” or the negatives of these terms or variations of them or similar terms. Furthermore, such forward-looking statements may be included in various filings that we make with the SEC or press releases or oral statements made by or with the approval of one of our authorized executive officers. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that these expectations will prove to be correct. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain known and unknown risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in these forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause actual results to differ include, but are not limited to, those discussed in the section entitled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 2 of this Report. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements contained herein, which reflect management’s opinions only as of the date hereof. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to revise or publicly release the results of any revision to any forward-looking statements. You are advised, however, to consult any additional disclosures we make in our reports to the SEC. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained in this Report.

 

1



 

PART I

 

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Overview

 

We are a leading developer, owner and operator of branded gaming facilities and related lodging and entertainment facilities in regional markets in the United States and internationally. We currently operate 14 casinos in the United States, located in Mississippi, Louisiana, Missouri, Iowa, Colorado and Florida. Internationally we operate 4 casinos in Coventry, Dudley and Wolverhampton, England and Freeport, Grand Bahamas. We also operate a harness racing track at our casino in Florida.

 

Our fiscal year ends each year on the last Sunday of April. During fiscal 2008, we opened casinos developed by us in Waterloo, Iowa and Coventry, England; completed the acquisition of our casino in Caruthersville, Missouri; purchased the 43% minority interest not owned by us in our Black Hawk, Colorado properties; and completed the opening of our new casino in Pompano, Florida. Also in fiscal 2008, we had significant changes to our executive management team, as James Perry joined us as Chief Executive Officer and as a director; Virginia McDowell became our President and Chief Operating Officer; and Dale Black became our Chief Financial Officer.

 

During fiscal 2008 we developed and announced a strategic plan designed to improve our free cash flow. This plan includes developing two distinct brands within our business, Isle and Lady Luck, and reinvesting in our core assets.

 

The Isle brand and will be introduced at our properties which have a regional draw and tend to be in larger markets where we have expansion potential demonstrated by either the size of the market or excess land that we control. The Isle brand will offer expanded amenities, usually offering hotel rooms, expanded food and beverage offerings and conference and convention capabilities.

 

The Lady Luck casinos will be focused on a local customer base, typically in smaller markets with less growth potential. The goal of the Lady Luck brand will be to offer the best entertainment option for the respective market featuring casual dining, and popular local entertainment in a comfortable setting.

 

The operating focus of both brands will be to deliver superior guest experience by providing customers with the most popular gaming product in a clean, safe, friendly and fun environment. We have begun implementing several operating initiatives to improve on these attributes as customer research consistently confirms that these are the primary drivers in our customers decision making process in choosing a casino to attend. To this end we have implemented a customer courtesy program whereby we will measure our progress against three primary courtesy behaviors and incentivise our employees on improvements. In addition our maintenance, capital, and operating plans have been designed to improve on areas where customers have told us we are lacking in these key areas of clean, safe, friendly and fun. Finally we have designed our incentive plans to align employee incentives with the key initiatives and shareholders’ needs.

 

Through the strategic planning process we identified several capital projects which we will seek to implement over the next 18 to 24 months and beyond, aimed at enhancing the experience of our customers and consistent with a brand strategy that is designed to clearly define the experience that will be delivered by each brand. This will enable us to manage the expectations of our customers, employees and the investment community, and will align our operating strategy with the needs of our customers in each market. We believe that these internal projects offer us the highest potential uses of the free cash flow that we expect to generate in the intermediate term, as we look to improve our properties and also begin to de-lever our Company.

 

We expect that approximately $160 million will go towards the rebuilding and refurbishment of the Biloxi property, which we plan to begin as soon as we determine the timing of the settlement of our Hurricane Katrina insurance claims, and our goal is to have the project completed roughly in line with the Margaritaville project which is being developed adjacent to our property.     We expect the insurance proceeds will provide a significant portion of the construction cost of the Biloxi project. The Biloxi project is expected to include a new single level casino, restoration of our convention space, new food venues, and renovation of the hotel rooms in the south hotel tower.

 

Additionally, we have earmarked approximately $16 million to $18 million to convert several of our local facilities to the Lady Luck brand. The Company plans to re-brand its properties in Davenport, Iowa, Lula, Mississippi, and Marquette, Iowa, and complete the re-branding in Caruthersville.

 

Lastly, we have identified approximately 1,200 hotel rooms (approximately forty percent of our room inventory) and many of the public areas in our hotels which are in need of renovation. We expect to begin the renovations once we have more clarity on the macro economic picture, our operating success and credit flexibility and better understand the estimated costs of completing the renovations.

 

2



 

Casino Properties

 

The following is an overview of our existing casino properties as of the end of fiscal year 2008:

 

 

 

Date Acquired or

 

Slot

 

Table

 

Hotel

 

Parking

 

Property

 

Opened

 

Machines

 

Games

 

Rooms

 

Spaces

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Louisiana

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lake Charles

 

July 1995

 

1,961

 

76

 

493

 

2,335

 

Mississippi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lula

 

March 2000

 

1,305

 

15

 

487

 

1,583

 

Biloxi

 

August 1992

 

1,336

 

40

 

710

 

1,600

 

Natchez

 

March 2000

 

630

 

11

 

141

 

908

 

Missouri

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kansas City

 

June 2000

 

1,335

 

25

 

 

1,807

 

Boonville

 

December 2001

 

947

 

27

 

140

 

1,101

 

Caruthersville

 

June 2007

 

651

 

23

 

 

1,000

 

Iowa

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bettendorf

 

March 2000

 

1,026

 

36

 

514

 

2,063

 

Rhythm City-Davenport

 

October 2000

 

972

 

14

 

 

968

 

Marquette

 

March 2000

 

614

 

13

 

25

 

475

 

Waterloo

 

July 2007

 

1,101

 

35

 

195

 

1,127

 

Colorado

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Black Hawk

 

December 1998

 

1,371

 

18

 

238

 

1,100

 

Colorado Central Station - Black Hawk

 

April 2003

 

644

 

16

 

164

 

1,200

 

Florida

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pompano Park

 

July 1995/April 2007

 

1,500

 

38

 

 

3,962

 

International Properties

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Our Lucaya

 

December 2003

 

303

 

25

 

 

 

Blue Chip-Dudley (66 2/3% owned)

 

November 2003

 

20

 

9

 

 

40

 

Blue Chip-Wolverhampton (66 2/3% owned)

 

April 2004

 

20

 

11

 

 

25

 

Coventry

 

July 2007

 

20

 

31

 

 

100

 

 

Louisiana

 

Lake Charles

 

Lake Charles, which commenced operations in July 1995, is located on a 19-acre site along Interstate 10, the main thoroughfare connecting Houston, Texas to Lake Charles, Louisiana. The property consists of two dockside casinos offering 1,961 slot machines and 76 table games, a 252-room deluxe hotel, a separate 241-room hotel, a 105,000 square foot land-based pavilion and entertainment center, and 2,335 parking spaces, including approximately 1,400 spaces in an attached parking garage. The pavilion and entertainment center offer customers a wide variety of non-gaming amenities, including a 97-seat Farraddays’ restaurant, a 360-seat Calypso’s buffet, a 165-seat Tradewinds Marketplace, a 64-seat Lucky Wins oriental restaurant and Caribbean Cove, which features free live entertainment and can accommodate 180 customers. The pavilion also has a 14,750 square foot entertainment center comprised of an 1,100-seat special events center designed for concerts, live boxing, televised pay-per-view events, banquets and other events, meeting facilities and administrative offices.

 

The Lake Charles market currently consists of two dockside gaming facilities (which include our property and Pinnacle Entertainment’s one-level facility), a Native American casino and a pari-mutuel facility/racino (operated by Boyd Gaming). Pinnacle Entertainment is in the process of developing their second casino (utilizing a license acquired from Harrah’s Entertainment after Hurricane Rita) which would be adjacent to their current facility. It is expected to be in operation by early 2010. The current number of slot machines in the market exceeds 8,200 machines and table games exceed 200 tables. In calendar year 2007, the two gaming facilities (Isle and Pinnacle) and one racino (Boyd), in the aggregate, generated gaming revenues of approximately $640.6 million. Revenues for the Native American property are not published. Lake Charles is the closest gaming market to the Houston metropolitan area, which has a population of approximately 5.5 million and is located approximately 140 miles west of Lake Charles. We believe that the Isle-Lake Charles attracts customers primarily from southeast Texas, including Houston, Beaumont, Galveston, Orange and Port Arthur and from local area residents. Approximately 520,000 and 1.6 million people reside within 50 and 100 miles, respectively, of the Isle-Lake Charles.

 

3



 

Mississippi

 

Lula

 

Lula, which we acquired in March 2000, is strategically located off of Highway 49, the only road crossing the Mississippi River between Mississippi and Arkansas for more than 50 miles in either direction. The property consists of two dockside casinos containing 1,305 slot machines and 15 table games, two on-site hotels with a total of 487 rooms, a land-based pavilion and entertainment center, 1,583 parking spaces, and a new 28-space RV Park, which opened in July of 2007. The pavilion and entertainment center offer a wide variety of non-gaming amenities, including a 145-seat Farraddays’ restaurant, a 300-seat Calypso’s buffet and a 44-seat Tradewinds Marketplace.

 

Our casino property is the only gaming facility in the Coahoma County, Mississippi market and generated gaming revenues of approximately $78.7 million in calendar year 2007. Lula draws a significant amount of business from the Little Rock, Arkansas metropolitan area, which has a population of approximately 666,000 and is located approximately 120 miles west of the property. Coahoma County is also located approximately 60 miles southwest of Memphis, Tennessee, which is primarily served by 9 casinos in Tunica, Mississippi. In addition, November 2007 saw the opening of a new competitor, Harlow’s Casino, 90 miles down-river from Lula in Greenville, MS. The opening of this new casino resulted in a 3% average reduction in the overall market share of Mississippi’s Northern Region, which includes Lula. The greater part of that impact was in our primary target market. Approximately 964,000 people reside within the property’s primary target market. Lula also competes with Native American casinos in Oklahoma and a racino in Memphis, Tennessee.

 

Biloxi

 

Biloxi, which commenced operations in August 1992, is located on a 17-acre site at the eastern end of a cluster of facilities formerly known as “Casino Row” in Biloxi, Mississippi, and is the first property reached by visitors coming from Alabama, Florida and Georgia via Highway 90.

 

On August 29, 2005 the property was significantly damaged by Hurricane Katrina. The property was closed on August 28, 2005 and remained closed to the public until December 26, 2005. The Highway 90 bridge spanning Biloxi Bay, located immediately to the east of the property, was also destroyed. The bridge was replaced with a new, larger bridge which partially opened in November 2007 and fully opened in April 2008.

 

In October 2005, the Mississippi legislature amended its gaming laws to allow casinos to operate land-based facilities within 800 feet of the mean high water line. Our Biloxi property is a land-based casino offering approximately 1,336 gaming positions, a 710-room hotel including 200 whirlpool suites, a 120-seat restaurant called “A Taste of Farraddays’,” a 200-seat Calypso’s buffet, a Tradewinds Express and 1,600 parking spaces. In May 2006, we completed the renovation of our existing atrium that added a new multi-story feature bar, connected the parking garage with the atrium by a covered walkway, and increased the number of parking spaces to approximately 1,600. In November 2006, we opened a 138-seat fine-dining restaurant and osteria called Bragozzo. In February 2007, we opened a full service Starbucks. In September 2007, we converted the Bragozzo restaurant to a full service Farraddays’ restaurant and converted “A Taste of Farraddays” to a banquet room called “Paradise Room” used to hold special events such as player parties.

 

Prior to Hurricane Katrina, the Mississippi Gulf Coast market (which includes Biloxi, Gulfport and Bay St. Louis) was one of the largest gaming markets in the United States and consisted of 12 dockside gaming facilities which, in the aggregate, generated gaming revenues of $1.2 billion during calendar year 2004, which was the last full calendar year before the storm. Including the Isle, eleven casinos have re-entered the market since Hurricane Katrina. In calendar year 2007, the Gulf Coast market reached revenues of $1.3 billion.

 

Natchez

 

Natchez, which we acquired in March 2000, is located off of Highways 84 and 61 in western Mississippi. The property consists of a dockside casino offering 630 slot machines and 11 table games, a 141-room off-site hotel located approximately one mile from the casino, a 150-seat Calypso’s buffet and 908 parking spaces.

 

Our property is currently the only gaming facility in the Natchez market and generated total revenues of approximately $42.2 million in calendar year 2007. We believe that the Isle-Natchez attracts customers primarily from among the 117,000 people residing within 50 miles of the Isle-Natchez.  The Grand Soleil Casino Company began site construction for its river

 

4



 

boat casino and land-based hotel during early 2008. Construction has been halted and restarted several times due to legal and financial issues, but we expect that the facility could potentially open and impact the Natchez market by early 2009.

 

Missouri

 

Kansas City

 

Our Kansas City property, which we acquired in June 2000, is the closest gaming facility to downtown Kansas City and consists of a dockside casino offering 1,335 slot machines and 25 table games, a 96-seat Farraddays’ Bistro restaurant, a 260-seat Calypso’s buffet, a 45-seat Tradewinds Marketplace and 1,807 parking spaces. Plans for an $85 million expansion project at our Kansas City property were cancelled in fiscal year 2008 and as a result, $1.1 million of the project costs were written off.

 

The Kansas City market consists of four dockside gaming facilities and a tribal casino that, in the aggregate, generated gaming revenues of approximately $720.7 million in calendar year 2007. The other operators of the dockside gaming facilities in this market are Ameristar Casinos, Penn National Gaming (formerly Argosy Gaming) and Harrah’s Entertainment. The tribal casino, owned by the Wyandotte Tribe, opened in January 2008 with 430 class II slots and generated about $4.4 million gaming revenue during the first three months of operations. We believe that our Kansas City casino attracts customers primarily from the Kansas City metropolitan area, which has approximately 1.9 million residents.

 

In the spring of 2007, the Kansas legislature authorized casinos in several locations throughout the State of Kansas, including two in the Kansas City, Kansas area. This process is on-going with one of the Kansas City, Kansas area casinos proposed to be located at the Woodlands Track and the other proposed to be a resort-type destination casino.

 

In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008, the State of Missouri, began reconstruction of the Paseo Bridge and interchanges adjacent to our property.  The construction is expected to continue into fiscal 2011.  While we expect traffic access to our property to be maintained during the construction period, our customers will be subject to changes in their egress routes.

 

Boonville

 

Our Boonville property, which opened on December 6, 2001, is located off of Interstate 70, approximately halfway between Kansas City and St. Louis. The property consists of a single level dockside casino offering 947 slot machines, 21 table games and 6 poker tables, a 140-room hotel that opened in May 2006, a 32,400 square foot pavilion and entertainment center and 1,101 parking spaces. The pavilion and entertainment center offers customers a wide variety of non-gaming amenities, including an 83-seat Farraddays’ restaurant, a 218-seat Calypso’s buffet, a 24-seat Tradewinds Marketplace, an 800 seat event center, and a historic display area. We are the only gaming facility between Kansas City, Missouri, and St. Louis, Missouri and generated gaming revenues of approximately $83.5 million in calendar year 2007. We believe that our Boonville casino attracts customers primarily from the mid-Missouri region including the Columbia and Jefferson City areas.

 

Caruthersville

 

Our Caruthersville property was acquired on June 11, 2007 and is a riverboat casino located along the Mississippi river in Southeast Missouri.  In June 2008, the casino was re-branded as a Lady Luck casino.  The property consists of 651 slot machines, 15 table games and 8 poker games.  Caruthersville is the only casino located in Southeast Missouri.

 

Iowa

 

Bettendorf

 

The Bettendorf property, which we acquired in March 2000, is located off of Interstate 74, an interstate highway serving the Quad Cities metropolitan area. The property consists of a dockside casino offering 1,026 slot machines and 36 table games, a 514-room hotel, including a new $45 million, 258-room tower, which opened in May 2007, approximately 20,500 square feet of convention/banquet space, a 102-seat Farraddays’ restaurant, a 272-seat Calypso’s buffet, a 26-seat Tradewinds Marketplace and 2,063 parking spaces.  We have entered into agreements with the City of Bettendorf, Iowa under which the City is constructing an events center adjacent to our new hotel.  We will lease, manage, and provide financial and operating support for the events center.

 

5



 

The Quad Cities metropolitan area, consisting of Bettendorf and Davenport, Iowa and Moline and Rock Island, Illinois, currently has three gaming operations—our two gaming facilities in Bettendorf and in Davenport, and one smaller operator, which has recently received approval to relocate within the market and construct a substantially larger facility. The three operations in the Quad Cities generated, in the aggregate, gaming revenues of approximately $189.9 million in calendar year 2007. Our operations in the Quad Cities also compete with other gaming operations in Illinois and Iowa.

 

Davenport

 

Our Davenport property, which we acquired in October 2000, is located at the intersection of River Drive and Highway 61, a state highway serving the Quad Cities metropolitan area. The property consists of a dockside gaming facility offering 972 slot machines and 14 table games, a 228-seat Hit Parade buffet, a Grab-n-Go food outlet and 968 parking spaces.

 

Marquette

 

Our Marquette property, which we acquired in March 2000, is located in Marquette, Iowa, approximately 60 miles north of Dubuque, Iowa. The property consists of a dockside casino offering 614 slot machines and 13 table games, a land-based facility which includes a 165-seat Calypso’s buffet restaurant, a Tradewinds Marketplace, an entertainment showroom, a 25-room hotel, a marina and 475 parking spaces.

 

We are the only gaming facility in the Marquette, Iowa market and generated gaming revenues of approximately $36.6 million in calendar year 2007. We believe most of our Marquette customers are from northeast Iowa and Wisconsin and we compete for those customers with other gaming facilities in Iowa and Wisconsin.

 

Waterloo

 

Our Waterloo property, which opened on June 30, 2007, is located adjacent to Highway 218 and US 20 in Waterloo, Iowa. The property consists of a single level casino offering 1,101 slot machines, 29 table games and 6 poker tables. The property also offers a wide variety of non-gaming amenities, including a 105-seat Farraddays’ restaurant  a 208-seat Isle buffet, a 36-seat Tradewinds marketplace, a 12-seat Starbucks, Club Capri Lounge, Fling feature bar, 5,000 sq. ft. of meeting space, over 1,100 parking spaces and a 195-room hotel, which includes 27 suites, as well as an indoor pool and hot tub area.

 

We are the only gaming facility in the Waterloo, Iowa market. We compete with other casinos in eastern Iowa. We generated gaming revenues of approximately $39.0 million in calendar year 2007, which included the first six months of the property’s operations.

 

Colorado

 

Black Hawk

 

Our Black Hawk property, which operates as a Isle branded casino, commenced operations in December 1998, is located on an approximately 10-acre site and is one of the first gaming facilities reached by customers arriving from Denver via Highway 119, the main thoroughfare connecting Denver to Black Hawk. The property includes a land-based casino with 1,371 slot machines and 18 table games, a 238-room hotel and 1,100 parking spaces in an attached parking garage. The Isle-Black Hawk also offers customers a wide variety of non-gaming amenities, including a 96-seat Farraddays’ restaurant, a 228-seat Calypso’s buffet and a 32-seat Tradewinds Marketplace.  In January 2008, Isle of Capri acquired the remaining minority interest in of this property from Nevada Gold & Casinos Inc., and we now own 100% of the Isle-Black Hawk.

 

The Colorado Central Station-Black Hawk

 

The Colorado Central Station-Black Hawk, which we acquired in April 2003, is located across the intersection of Main Street and Mill Street from the Isle-Black Hawk. The property consists of a land-based casino with 644 slot machines, 16 table games, a 164-room hotel that opened in December 2005 and 1,200 parking spaces in our parking structure connecting Isle-Black Hawk and Colorado Central Station-Black Hawk. The property also offers guests dining in its Station Café  that was opened in early 2007 as well as a Quizno’s sandwich franchise that is located in the basement of the facility.  All three sites are connected via sky bridges. In January 2008, we acquired the minority interest in this property from Nevada Gold & Casinos Inc., and we now own 100% of the Black Hawk operations.

 

6



 

When casinos having multiple gaming licenses in the same building are combined, the Black Hawk/Central City market consists of 23 gaming facilities (eight of which have more than 600 slot machines), which in aggregate, generated gaming revenues of approximately $661.2 million in calendar year 2007. Black Hawk is the closest gaming market to the Denver, Colorado metropolitan area, which has a population of approximately 2.7 million and is located approximately 40 miles east of Black Hawk. We believe that the Black Hawk and Colorado Central Station-Black Hawk attract customers primarily from Denver, Boulder, Fort Collins and Golden, Colorado and Cheyenne, Wyoming.

 

Florida

 

Pompano

 

In 1995, we acquired Pompano Park, a harness racing track located in Pompano Beach, Florida. Pompano Park is located off of Interstate 95 and the Florida Turnpike on a 223-acre owned site, near Fort Lauderdale, midway between Miami and West Palm Beach. Pompano Park is the only racetrack licensed to conduct harness racing in Florida.

 

On April 14, 2007, following changes to Florida law, we opened a gaming facility including 1,500 slot machines, two restaurants and a feature bar at Pompano Park adjacent to the existing grandstand at a cost of approximately $190 million. Two additional restaurants and a new poker room with 38 tables on the second floor of the facility opened in May 2007.  The Isle-Pompano draws most of its customers from the approximately 2.6 million people residing within a 25-mile radius of the facility and competes with two other racinos and two tribal gaming facilities in the market.

 

Grand Bahama Island

 

Our Lucaya

 

Our Lucaya is a 19,000 square-foot casino located at the Our Lucaya Resort in Freeport, Grand Bahama and offers 303 slot machines, 25 table games and a 110-seat restaurant.

 

United Kingdom

 

Blue Chip-Dudley

 

Our pub-style casino in Dudley, England is one of 17 gaming facilities in the West Midlands market. Dudley is close to the Birmingham metropolitan area, which has a population of approximately 5.3 million. The casino consists of 20 slot machines, 9 table games, and 28 electronic touch bet table terminals. We own two-thirds of the Blue Chip-Dudley.

 

Blue Chip-Wolverhampton

 

Our pub-style casino in Wolverhampton, England is also in the West Midlands market. Wolverhampton is close to the Birmingham metropolitan area. The casino consists of 20 slot machines, 11 table games, and 34 electronic touch bet table terminals. We own two-thirds of the Blue Chip-Wolverhampton.

 

Coventry

 

On July 6, 2007, we opened a casino in Coventry, England under the 1968 Gambling Act. This facility has 20 slot machines, 31 table games, including poker, and 50 electronic touch bet table terminals.  The development is a full entertainment facility with two restaurants and three bars.

 

Marketing

 

Our marketing programs are designed to promote our overall business strategy of providing customers with a safe, clean, friendly and fun gaming experience at each of our properties. We have developed an extensive proprietary database of customers that allows us to create effective targeted marketing and promotional programs that are designed to reward customer loyalty, attract new customers to our properties and maintain high recognition of our brands.

 

7



 

In March 2008 we announced our new strategic plan, the main components of which are to focus on organic growth opportunities and to consolidate our portfolio into two brands – Isle and Lady Luck.  Our re-branding decisions will be based on a variety of factors, including the size of the facility, amenities, and the size of the primary markets served.  The Isle brand will feature regional facilities with hotel rooms and convention facilities designed for both business and leisure travelers, with upgraded amenities, all of which will complement our casino product. Based on a significant market research project conducted with our database customers, we will reintroduce Lady Luck as the brand for our smaller facilities that serve more local markets.

 

Specifically, as we implement our strategic plan, we expect our marketing programs and initiatives to focus on the following areas:

 

·       Customer Research: Overall, our operating and marketing strategies have been developed and are being implemented to meet the needs and desires of our customers in each of our locations.  In order to assess these needs and desires, we engage in significant customer research in each of our markets.  Upon receipt of these surveys, we assess the attitudes of our customers and the customers of our competitive properties towards the most important attributes of their experience in a regional and/or local gaming facility.  We use the extensive information gathered from these research initiatives to make marketing, operating and development decisions that, we believe, will optimize the position of our properties relative to our competition.

 

·       Branding Initiatives: As previously discussed, we have designed a strategic plan that will consolidate our property portfolio from four brands into two brands.  We believe that this approach will allow us to most effectively align and promote our properties based upon customer needs and desires, will further allow us to more efficiently market our properties on a consolidated basis, and will streamline the costs associated with marketing our portfolio.

 

·       Database Marketing: We are streamlining our database marketing initiatives across the Company in order to focus our marketing efforts on profitable customers who have a proven willingness to regularly visit our properties.  Specifically, our focus is on eliminating from our database customers who have historically been included in significant marketing efforts but have proven costly either as a result of excessive marketing expenditures on the part of the Company, or because these customers have become relatively dormant in terms of customer activity yet have remained active in our database.

 

·       Segmentation: We have compiled an extensive database of customer information over time.  Among our most important marketing initiatives, we are currently introducing database segmentation to our properties in order to adjust investment rates to a level at which we expect to meet a reasonable level of customer profitability.

 

·       Retail Development: We believe that we must more effectively attract new, non-database customers to our properties moving forward in order to increase profitability and free cash flow.  These customers are generally less expensive to attract and retain and, therefore, currently represent a significant opportunity for our operations.

 

Employees

 

As of April 27, 2008, we employed approximately 8,559 people. None of our employees are subject to a collective bargaining agreement. We believe that our relationship with our employees is satisfactory.

 

Governmental Regulations

 

The gaming and racing industries are highly regulated, and we must maintain our licenses and pay gaming taxes to continue our operations. Each of our facilities is subject to extensive regulation under the laws, rules and regulations of the jurisdiction where it is located. These laws, rules and regulations generally relate to the responsibility, financial stability and character of the owners, managers and persons with financial interests in the gaming operations. Violations of laws in one jurisdiction could result in disciplinary action in other jurisdictions. A more detailed description of the regulations to which we are subject is contained in Exhibit 99.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K, which exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Our businesses are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations in addition to gaming regulations. These laws and regulations include, but are not limited to, restrictions and conditions concerning alcoholic beverages, environmental matters, employees, currency transactions, taxation, zoning and building codes, and marketing and advertising. Such laws and regulations could change or could be interpreted differently in the future, or new laws and

 

8



 

regulations could be enacted. Material changes, new laws or regulations, or material differences interpretations by courts or governmental authorities could adversely affect our operating results.

 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

 

We face significant competition from other gaming operations that could have a material adverse effect on our future operations.

 

The gaming industry is intensely competitive, and we face a high degree of competition in the markets in which we operate. We have numerous competitors, including land-based casinos, dockside casinos, riverboat casinos, casinos located on Native American-owned lands and at racing and pari-mutuel operations and video lottery and video poker machines not located in casinos. Several of our competitors have substantially better name recognition, marketing and financial resources than we do; competitors with more financial resources may therefore be able to improve the quality of, or expand, their gaming facilities in a way that we may be unable to match. Legalized gaming is currently permitted in various forms throughout the United States. Certain states have recently legalized, and other states are currently considering legalizing gaming, Other jurisdictions, including states in close proximity to jurisdictions where we currently have operations, have considered and may consider legalizing casino gaming and other forms of competition. In addition, there is no limit on the number of gaming licenses that may be granted in several of the markets in which we operate. As a result, new licenses could be awarded to gaming facilities in these markets, which could allow new gaming operators to enter our markets and have an adverse effect on our operating results.  Expansion of existing gaming facilities and the development of new gaming facilities in our current markets will increase competition for our existing and future operations. In addition, many Native American tribes conduct casino gaming on Native American-owned lands throughout the United States.  These facilities have the advantages of being land-based and exempt from certain state and federal taxes and operational restrictions.  Some Native American tribes are either in the process of establishing or expanding, or are considering the establishment or expansion of, gaming in Oklahoma, Texas, Louisiana, Florida, Alabama, Kansas, Colorado, Mississippi, Wisconsin and Iowa. The establishment or expansion of new gaming facilities and casinos on Native American-owned lands will increase competition for our existing and future gaming facilities in proximity to Native American-owned lands.

 

We also compete with other forms of legalized gaming and entertainment such as online computer gambling, bingo, pull tab games, card parlors, sports books, “cruise-to-nowhere” operations, pari-mutuel or telephonic betting on horse racing and dog racing, state-sponsored lotteries, jai-alai, and, in the future, may compete with gaming at other venues.   In addition, we compete more generally with other forms of entertainment for the discretionary spending of our customers.

 

Our existing gaming facilities compete directly with other gaming properties in Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Iowa, Florida and Colorado. We also compete with gaming operators in other gaming jurisdictions such as Atlantic City, New Jersey and Las Vegas, Nevada. Our existing casinos attract a significant number of their customers from Houston, Texas; Mobile, Alabama; Kansas City, Missouri; Southern Florida; Little Rock, Arkansas and Denver, Colorado. Our continued success depends upon drawing customers from each of these geographic markets. Legalization of gaming in jurisdictions closer to these geographic markets than the jurisdictions in which our facilities are located would have a material adverse effect on our operating results. In that regard, the Kansas Legislature recently authorized casinos in several locations throughout the state of Kansas, including two in the Kansas City, Kansas area. We expect competition to increase as new gaming operators enter our markets, existing competitors expand their operations, gaming activities expand in existing jurisdictions and gaming is legalized in new jurisdictions. We cannot predict with any certainty the effects of existing and future competition on our operating results.

 

We are subject to extensive regulation from gaming authorities that could adversely affect us.

 

As owners and operators of gaming and pari-mutuel wagering facilities, we are subject to extensive state and local regulation.  State and local authorities require us and our subsidiaries to demonstrate suitability to obtain and retain various licenses and require that we have registrations, permits and approvals to conduct gaming operations. The regulatory authorities in the jurisdictions in which we operate have very broad discretion with regard to their regulation of gaming operators, and may for a broad variety of reasons and in accordance with applicable laws, rules and regulations, limit, condition, suspend, fail to renew or revoke a license to conduct gaming operations or prevent us from owning the securities of any of our gaming subsidiaries, or prevent other persons from owning an interest in us or doing business with us.  We may also be deemed responsible for the acts and conduct of our employees. Substantial fines or forfeiture of

 

9



 

assets for violations of gaming laws or regulations may be levied against us, our subsidiaries and the persons involved, and some regulatory authorities have the ability to require us to suspend our operations. The suspension or revocation of any of our licenses or our operations or the levy on us or our subsidiaries of a substantial fine would have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

To date, we have demonstrated suitability to obtain and have obtained all governmental licenses, registrations, permits and approvals necessary for us to operate our existing gaming facilities.  We cannot assure you that we will be able to retain these licenses, registrations, permits and approvals or that we will be able to obtain any new ones in order to expand our business, or that our attempts to do so will be timely. Like all gaming operators in the jurisdictions in which we operate, we must periodically apply to renew our gaming licenses and have the suitability of certain of our directors, officers and employees approved.  We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain such renewals or approvals.

 

In addition, regulatory authorities in certain jurisdictions must approve, in advance, any restrictions on transfers of, agreements not to encumber or pledges of equity securities issued by a corporation that is registered as an intermediary company with such state, or that holds a gaming license. If these restrictions are not approved in advance, they will be invalid.

 

From time to time, legislators and special interest groups have proposed legislation that would expand, restrict or prevent gaming operations in the jurisdictions in which we operate. In addition, from time to time, certain anti-gaming groups have challenged constitutional amendments or legislation that would limit our ability to continue to operate in those jurisdictions in which these constitutional amendments or legislation have been adopted. For example, the Florida District Court of Appeals First District reversed the lower court’s decision granting summary judgment in favor of Floridians for a Level Playing Field (FLPF), of which we are a member. The Court ruled that a trial is necessary to determine whether FLPF failed to obtain the required number of signatures to place the constitutional amendment authorizing slot machines on the ballot approved by the voters. We believe that at trial FLPF would prevail on the merits. However, if FLPF is ultimately unsuccessful in the litigation, the statewide vote amending the Florida constitution to permit slot machines at pari-mutuels could be invalidated and our right to operate slot machines at Pompano Park would be eliminated, which would have an adverse effect on us. We cannot assure you as to the outcome of this litigation.

 

We are subject to the possibility of an increase in gaming taxes and fees, which would increase our costs.

 

State and local authorities raise a significant amount of revenue through taxes and fees on gaming activities.  We believe that the prospect of significant revenue is one of the primary reasons that jurisdictions permit legalized gaming.  As a result, gaming companies are typically subject to significant taxes and fees in addition to normal federal, state, local and provincial income taxes, and such taxes and fees are subject to increase at any time. We pay substantial taxes and fees with respect to our operations.  From time to time, federal, state, local and provincial legislators and officials have proposed changes in tax laws, or in the administration of such laws, affecting the gaming industry.  In addition, we believe that worsening economic conditions that result in state and local governments having budget shortfalls (as is currently the case in many of the jurisdictions in which we operate)  could intensify the efforts of state and local governments to raise revenues through increases in gaming taxes.  Some of the states in which we own or operate casinos continue to experience budget shortfalls and, as a result, may increase gaming taxes to raise more revenue.  We cannot determine with certainty the likelihood of changes in tax laws or in the administration of such laws.  Such changes, if adopted, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

We are subject to non-gaming regulation that could adversely affect us.

 

Several of our riverboats must comply with U.S. Coast Guard requirements as to boat design, on-board facilities, equipment, personnel and safety and must hold U.S. Coast Guard Certificates of Documentation and Inspection.  The U.S. Coast Guard requirements also set limits on the operation of the riverboats and mandate licensing of certain personnel involved with the operation of the riverboats.  Loss of a riverboat’s Certificate of Documentation and Inspection could preclude its use as a riverboat casino.  Each of our riverboats is inspected annually and, every five years, is subject to dry-docking for inspection of its hull, which could result in a temporary loss of service.

 

10



 

We are required to have third parties periodically inspect and certify all of our casino barges for stability and single compartment flooding integrity.  Our casino barges and other facilities must also meet local fire safety standards.  We would incur additional costs if any of our gaming facilities were not in compliance with one or more of these regulations.

 

We are also subject to certain federal, state and local environmental laws, regulations and ordinances that apply to non-gaming businesses generally, such as the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Resource Conservation Recovery Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act and the Oil Pollution Act of 1990.  Under various federal, state and local laws and regulations, an owner or operator of real property may be held liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances or wastes located on its property, regardless of whether or not the present owner or operator knows of, or is responsible for, the presence of such substances or wastes.  We have not identified any issues associated with our properties that could reasonably be expected to have an adverse effect on us or the results of our operations.  However, several of our properties are located in industrial areas or were used for industrial purposes for many years.  As a consequence, it is possible that historical or neighboring activities have affected one or more of our properties and that, as a result, environmental issues could arise in the future, the precise nature of which we cannot now predict.  The coverage and attendant compliance costs associated with these laws, regulations and ordinances may result in future additional costs.

 

Regulations adopted by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the U.S. Treasury Department require us to report currency transactions in excess of $10,000 occurring within a gaming day, including identification of the patron by name and social security number. U.S. Treasury Department regulations also require us to report certain suspicious activity, including any transaction that exceeds $5,000 if we know, suspect or have reason to believe that the transaction involves funds from illegal activity or is designed to evade federal regulations or reporting requirements. Substantial penalties can be imposed against us if we fail to comply with these regulations.

 

We are also subject to a variety of other local rules and regulations, including zoning, environmental, construction and land-use laws and regulations governing the serving of alcoholic beverages.

 

Our business may be adversely affected by legislation prohibiting tobacco smoking.

 

Legislation in various forms to ban indoor tobacco smoking has recently been enacted or introduced in many states and local jurisdictions, including several of the jurisdictions in which we operate. On January 1, 2008, a statewide smoking ban that includes casino floors went into effect in Colorado. This smoking ban in Colorado has had some negative impact on business volume at our Black Hawk properties, the long-term impact of which we cannot yet predict. If additional restrictions on smoking are enacted in jurisdictions in which we operate, particularly if such restrictions are not applicable to all competitive facilities in that gaming market, our business could be materially and adversely affected .

 

Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our financial health and restrict our operations.

 

We have a significant amount of indebtedness. As of April 27, 2008, we had approximately $1.5 billion of total debt outstanding.

 

Our significant indebtedness could have important consequences to our financial health, such as:

 

· limiting our ability to obtain additional financing to fund our working capital requirements, capital expenditures, debt service, general corporate or other obligations;

 

· limiting our ability to use operating cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, expansion and other important areas of our business because we must dedicate a significant portion of our cash flow to make principal and interest payments on our indebtedness;

 

· increasing our interest expense if there is a rise in interest rates, because a portion of our borrowings under our senior secured credit facility are subject to interest rate periods with short-term durations that require ongoing refunding at the then current rates of interest;

 

· causing an event of default if we fail to satisfy the financial and restrictive covenants contained in the indenture and agreements governing our 7% senior subordinated notes due 2014, our senior secured credit facility and our other indebtedness, which could result in all of our debt becoming immediately due and payable, could permit our secured lenders to foreclose on the assets securing our secured debt and have

 

11



 

other adverse consequences, any of which, if not cured or waived, could have a material adverse effect on us;

 

· placing us at a competitive disadvantage to our competitors who are not as highly leveraged; and

 

· increasing our vulnerability to and limiting our ability to react to changing market conditions, changes in our industry and economic downturns or downturns in our business.

 

Any of the factors listed above could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.  In addition, although based on our current level of operations, we believe that our operating cash flow, available cash and available borrowings under our senior secured credit facility will be sufficient to meet our anticipated future liquidity needs, we cannot assure you that our business will continue to generate sufficient cash flow, or that future available draws under our senior secured credit facility will be sufficient, to enable us to meet our liquidity needs, including to service our indebtedness.

 

Despite our significant indebtedness, we may still be able to incur significantly more debt. This could intensify the risks described above.

 

The terms of the indenture and agreements governing the senior subordinated 7% notes, our senior secured credit facility and our other indebtedness limit, but do not prohibit, us or our subsidiaries from incurring significant additional indebtedness in the future.

 

As of April 27, 2008, we had the capacity to incur additional indebtedness, including the ability to incur additional indebtedness under all of our lines of credit, of approximately $170.0 million. Refer to Footnote 7, Long-Term Debt, for additional discussion on our Senior Secured Credit Facility. Approximately $18.6 million of these lines of credit were used to support letters of credit. Our capacity to issue additional indebtedness is subject to the limitations imposed by the covenants in our senior secured credit facility and the indenture governing our senior subordinated 7% notes.  The indenture governing our senior subordinated 7% notes and our senior secured credit facility contain financial and other restrictive covenants, but will not fully prohibit us from incurring additional debt.  If new debt is added to our current level of indebtedness, the related risks that we now face could intensify.

 

Restrictive covenants in the agreements governing our indebtedness may prevent us from pursuing business strategies that could otherwise improve our results of operations.

 

We have made and will need to make significant capital expenditures at our existing facilities to remain competitive with current and future competitors in our markets.  Our senior secured credit facility and the indenture governing our senior subordinated 7% notes contain operating and financial restrictions that may limit our ability to obtain the financing to make these capital expenditures.

 

Our agreements governing our indebtedness, among other things, require us to maintain certain specified financial ratios and to meet certain financial tests.  Our debt agreements also limit our ability to:

 

· borrow money;

 

· make capital expenditures;

 

· use assets as security in other transactions;

 

· make restricted payments or restricted investments;

 

· incur contingent obligations; and

 

· sell assets and enter into leases and transactions with affiliates.

 

We may experience construction delays during our expansion or development projects which could adversely affect our operations.

 

We currently expect to begin a construction project at our Biloxi property and plan to commence additional construction projects at several of our properties. We also evaluate other expansion opportunities as they become available and we may in the future engage in additional construction projects. The anticipated costs and construction periods are based upon budgets, conceptual design documents and construction schedule estimates prepared by us in consultation with our architects and contractors.

 

Construction projects entail significant risks, which can substantially increase costs or delay completion of a project. Such risks include shortages of materials or skilled labor, unforeseen engineering, environmental

 

12



 

or geological problems, work stoppages, weather interference and unanticipated cost increases.  Most of these factors are beyond our control.  In addition, difficulties or delays in obtaining any of the requisite licenses, permits or authorizations from regulatory authorities can increase the cost or delay the completion of an expansion or development. Significant budget overruns or delays with respect to expansion and development projects could adversely affect our results of operations.

 

We may not be able to successfully expand to new locations or recover our investment in new properties which would adversely affect our operations and available resources.

 

We regularly evaluate and pursue new gaming acquisition and development opportunities in existing and new gaming markets. To the extent that we elect to pursue any new gaming acquisition or development opportunity, our ability to benefit from our investment will depend on many factors, including:

 

· our ability to successfully identify attractive acquisition and development opportunities;

 

· our ability to successfully operate any developed or acquired properties;

 

· our ability to attract and retain competent management and employees for the new locations;

 

· our ability to secure required federal, state and local licenses, permits and approvals, which in some jurisdictions are limited in number and subject to intense competition and;

 

· the availability of adequate financing on acceptable terms.

 

Many of these factors are beyond our control. There have recently been significant disruptions in the global capital markets that have adversely impacted the ability of borrowers to access capital.  Many analysts are predicting that these disruptions may continue for the foreseeable future.  Accordingly, it is likely that we are dependent on free cash flow from operations and remaining borrowing capacity under our senior secured credit facility to implement our near-term expansion plans and fund our planned capital expenditures.  As a result of these and other considerations, we cannot be sure that we will be able to recover our investments in any new gaming development opportunities or acquired facilities, or successfully expand to additional locations.

 

If our key personnel leave us, our business could be adversely affected.

 

We have recently had many changes in our senior executive management team, and have embarked on the execution of a strategic plan developed by, and to be led by, that team.  Our continued success will depend, among other things, on the efforts and skills of a few key executive officers and the experience of our property managers, which have also recently experienced significant turnover.  Our success also depends on our ability to attract and retain additional highly qualified personnel with gaming industry experience and qualifications to obtain the requisite licenses.  We do not maintain “key man” life insurance for any of our employees. There is no assurance that we would be able to attract and hire suitable replacements for any of our key employees. We need qualified executives, managers and skilled employees with gaming industry experience to continue to successfully operate our business.  We believe a shortage of skilled labor in the gaming industry may make it increasingly difficult and expensive to attract and retain qualified employees.  We expect that increased competition in the gaming industry will intensify this problem.

 

Members of the Goldstein family control a large percentage of our common stock and their decisions may differ from those that may be made by other shareholders.

 

Bernard Goldstein, our current Chairman and former Chief Executive Officer, his sons, including Robert Goldstein, our Vice Chairman and Jeffrey Goldstein, one of our directors; and various family trusts associated with members of the Goldstein Family, collectively own and control approximately 51% of our common stock, as of July 8, 2008.  Although the members of the Goldstein family are free to vote their shares differently than one another, the Goldstein family will be able to exert a significant amount of control over the election of our board of directors and the vote on substantially all other matters, including significant corporate transactions, such as the approval of a merger or other transactions involving a sale of us.  The interests of the Goldstein family may differ from those of our other shareholders.

 

We have a history of fluctuations in our operating income (losses), and we may incur additional operating losses in the future.  Our operating results could fluctuate significantly on a periodic basis.

 

13



 

We sustained a net loss of $96.9 million and operating loss of $36.1 million in fiscal year 2008 and a net loss of $4.6 million in fiscal year 2007. Companies with fluctuations in income (loss) from operations often find it more challenging to raise capital to finance improvements in their businesses and to undertake other activities that return value to their shareholders. In addition, companies with operating results that fluctuate significantly on a quarterly or annual basis experience increased volatility in their stock prices in addition to difficulties in raising capital.  We cannot assure you that we will not have fluctuations in our income (losses) from operations in the future, and should that occur, that we would not suffer adverse consequences to our business as a result, which could decrease the value of our common stock.

 

Inclement weather and other conditions could seriously disrupt our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Dockside and riverboat facilities are subject to risks in addition to those associated with land-based casinos, including loss of service due to casualty, mechanical failure, extended or extraordinary maintenance, flood, hurricane or other severe weather. Our riverboats and barges face additional risks from the movement of vessels on waterways.

 

Reduced patronage and the loss of a dockside or riverboat casino from service for any period of time could adversely affect our results of operations. For example, as a result of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, we closed our Biloxi facility from August 28, 2005 to December 26, 2005 and our Lake Charles facility from September 22, 2005 to October 8, 2005.  Flooding on the waterways where our dockside and riverboat casinos operate also may require us to close our facilities from time to time, with a resulting adverse affect on our business.  During the Spring of 2008, we were forced to close our Natchez and Davenport properties, for several days each, due to flooding. While our business interruption insurance provided sufficient coverage for those losses, we cannot be sure that the proceeds from any future claim will be sufficient to compensate us if one or more of our casinos experience a closure.

 

In fiscal 2007 and 2008, in part as a result of hurricane claims in the Gulf Coast region over the past several years, we have experienced a significant increase in property and business interruption premiums.

 

Access to a number of our facilities may also be affected by road conditions, such as construction and traffic. In addition, severe weather such as high winds and blizzards occasionally limits access to our facilities in Colorado.

 

Energy and fuel price increases, such as the recent dramatic increases in gasoline prices, may adversely affect our costs of operations and our revenues.

 

Our casino properties use significant amounts of electricity, natural gas and other forms of energy. While no shortages of energy have been experienced, substantial increases in the cost of electricity in the United States would negatively affect our results of operations.  In addition, energy and fuel price increases in cities that constitute a significant source of customers for our properties could result in a decline in disposable income of potential customers, and lead our customers and potential customers to decide not to travel, both of which could result in a corresponding decrease in visitation to our properties, which would negatively impact our revenues.  The extent of the impact is subject to the magnitude and duration of the energy and fuel price increases, which recently have been very significant, but this impact could be material.

 

A downturn in general economic conditions may adversely affect our results of operations.

 

Our business operations are subject to changes in international, national and local economic conditions, including changes in the economy as well as the economic impact related to future security alerts in connection with threatened or actual terrorist attacks and related to the war in Iraq, which may affect our customers’ willingness to travel and visit our properties. Recent unprecedented increases in the price of gasoline may also affect our customers’ willingness to travel.  A recession or downturn in the general economy, or in a region constituting a significant source of customers for our properties, could result in fewer customers visiting our properties, which would adversely affect our results of operations.

 

The market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly.

 

The market price of our common stock has historically been volatile and may continue to fluctuate substantially due to a number of factors, including actual or anticipated changes in our results of operations, the announcement of significant transactions or other agreements by our competitors, conditions or trends

 

14



 

in the our industry or other entertainment industries with which we compete, general economic conditions including those affecting our customers’ discretionary spending, changes in the cost of air travel or the cost of gasoline, changes in the gaming markets in which we operate and changes in the trading value of our common stock.  The stock market in general, as well as stocks in the gaming sector have been subject to significant volatility and extreme price fluctuations that have sometimes been unrelated or disproportionate to individual companies’ operating performances.   Broad market or industry factors may harm the market price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance.

 

We have international operations that are subject to different risks than our domestic operations.

 

In the UK and the Bahamas, we are subject to certain additional risks, including difficulty in staffing and managing foreign subsidiary operations, foreign currency fluctuations, dependence on foreign economies, political issues, adverse tax consequences and uncertainty in regulatory reform in the UK. In addition, in the Bahamas current gaming regulation preclude residents from participating in gaming activities. Therefore, disruptions in tourism traffic due to issues such as increased costs and/or reduced availability of airline and other means of transportation and hotel accommodations can have an adverse impact in our gaming operations.

 

Failure to maintain effective internal controls in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act could result in a loss of investor confidence regarding our financial reports or may have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

We are required to comply with the reporting requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.  In doing so, we may identify significant deficiencies or errors that are not currently known to us.  As a public company, we are required to report, among other things, control deficiencies that constitute a “ material weakness” or changes in internal controls that, or that are reasonably likely to, materially affect internal controls over financial reporting.

 

In fiscal 2007, we identified several material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and have restated our financial results for the years ended through April 30, 2006 and the related quarterly results therein, and the first three fiscal quarters ended January 28, 2007. We believe that we have remediated our material weaknesses. We cannot be assured that additional material weaknesses, significant deficiencies and control deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting will not be identified in the future.

 

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting in the future could be impacted by a variety of factors, including faulty human judgment, simple errors, omissions or mistakes, and the possibility that any enhancements to disclosure controls and procedures may still not be adequate to assure timely and accurate financial information.

 

If we fail to achieve and maintain effective controls and procedures for financial reporting, we could be unable to provide timely and accurate financial information. This may cause us to fail to satisfy the reporting requirements with our lenders and give rise to an event of default or cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information. This may also have an adverse effect on the trading price of our common stock.

 

* * * * * * *

 

In addition to the foregoing, you should consider each of the factors set forth in this Annual Report in evaluating our business and our prospects. The factors described in our Part 1 Item 1A are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently consider immaterial may also impair our business operations.   This report is qualified in its entirety by these risk factors.  If any of the foregoing risks actually occur, our business, financial condition and results of operation could be materially harmed.  In that case, the trading price of our securities, including our common stock, could decline significantly.

 

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

 

None.

 

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

 

Lake Charles

 

We own approximately 2.7 acres and lease approximately 16.2 acres of land in Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana for use in connection with the Isle-Lake Charles. This lease automatically renewed in March 2005 for five years and we have the option to renew it for fifteen (15) additional terms of five years each, subject to increases based on the Consumer Price Index

 

15



 

(“CPI”) with a minimum of 10% and construction of hotel facilities on the property. We own two hotels in Lake Charles with a total of 493 rooms. Annual rent payments under the Lake Charles lease are approximately $2.1 million.

 

Lula

 

We lease approximately 1,000 acres of land in Coahoma County, Mississippi and utilize approximately 50 acres in connection with the operations of the Isle-Lula. Unless terminated by us at an earlier date, the lease expires in 2033. Rent under the lease is currently 5.5% of gross gaming revenue as reported to the Mississippi Gaming Commission, plus $100,000 annually. We also own approximately 100 acres in Coahoma County, which may be utilized for future development.

 

Biloxi

 

We lease our Biloxi berth from the Biloxi Port Commission at an annual rent of the greater of $510,000 or 1% of the gross gaming revenue net of state and local gaming taxes. The lease terminates on July 1, 2009 and we have the option to renew it for seven additional terms of five years each subject to increases based on the CPI, limited to 6% for each renewal period.

 

We lease the real estate upon which some of our land-based facilities, including the casino, are located from the City of Biloxi and the Mississippi Secretary of State at current annual rent of $561,800 per year, plus 3% of our Biloxi property’s gross gaming revenues, net of state and local gaming taxes and fees, in excess of $25.0 million. The lease terminates on July 1, 2009, but it is renewable at our option for five additional terms of five years each and a sixth option renewal term, concluding on January 31, 2034, subject to rent increases based on the CPI, limited to 6% for each renewal period.

 

In April 1994, in connection with the construction of a hotel, we entered into a lease for additional land adjoining our Biloxi property. This lease with the City of Biloxi and the Mississippi Secretary of State is for an initial term of 25 years, with options to renew for six additional terms of ten years each and a final option period concluding December 31, 2085. Current annual rent is $605,000 plus 4% of gross non-gaming revenues, as defined in the lease, and renewals are subject to rent increases based on the CPI. The annual rent is adjusted after each five-year period based on increases in the CPI, limited to a 10% increase in any five-year period.

 

In August 2002, we entered into a lease for two additional parcels of land adjoining our property and the hotel. On the parcel adjoining the Biloxi property, we constructed a multi-level parking garage that has approximately 1,000 parking spaces. There is additional ground level parking on a parcel of land in front of the garage, also subject to this lease, with approximately 600 parking spaces. We have constructed a 400-room addition to the existing hotel on the parcel leased next to the existing hotel. In addition, we may construct a hotel above the parking garage. This lease with the City of Biloxi and the Mississippi Secretary of State is for an initial term of forty years, with one option to renew for an additional twenty-five years and additional options thereafter, with the consent of the Mississippi Secretary of State, consistent with the term of the lease described in the preceding paragraph. When combined with the base and percentage rents described for the leases in the preceding two paragraphs, annual rent under those two leases and this lease was $4.0 million for lease year ending July 31, 2007, and estimated to be $3.5 million for the lease year ending July 31, 2008. Such minimum rent is to increase thereafter over time in accordance with a formula based on anticipated timing for completion of the hotel on top of the parking garage (or August 31, 2008, whichever occurs first), up to a minimum rent of $3.7 million.  The minimum rent for the lease year beginning August 1, 2008 will be $3.7 million in accordance with the terms of the lease agreement. Such amounts are subject to decreases due to market adjustments and increases based on the CPI. Also, we are responsible for annual rent equal to 4% of gross retail revenue and gross cash revenue (as defined in the lease), but without double counting. If the rent minimum described in the preceding sentences is not otherwise satisfied from other rents, then this percentage rent is not in addition to the minimum rent, but rather is to be applied to that minimum.

 

In connection with and pursuant to a settlement between the City of Biloxi and the State of Mississippi concerning the control and management of the area where we are located, we also have agreed to pay the City of Biloxi’s lease obligations to the State of Mississippi for an agreed upon period of time. This amount is $500,000 per year, payable on June 30, subject to increases based on the CPI and decreases if there are other tenants of the subject property. This obligation ends after June 2018 but may be renewed for thirty years.

 

We have also entered into a joint venture arrangement to sublease a surface parking lot next to our Biloxi property. Our portion of the annual rent under this lease is approximately $222,000. The current term is for five years expiring December 31, 2010, with a renewal option for an additional five-year term (under which our annual rent would increase based on the CPI), extending the lease through December 31, 2015, if exercised.

 

16



 

Natchez

 

Through numerous lease agreements, we lease approximately 24 acres of land in Natchez, Mississippi that are used in connection with the operations of our Natchez property. Unless terminated by us at an earlier date, the leases have varying expiration dates through 2037. Annual rent under the leases total approximately $1.1 million. We also lease approximately 7.5 acres of land that is utilized for parking at the facility. We own approximately 6 additional acres of property in Natchez, Mississippi, as well as the property upon which our hotel is located.

 

Kansas City

 

We lease approximately 28 acres from the Kansas City Port Authority in connection with the operation of our Kansas City property. The term of the original lease was ten years and expired in October 2006 and was renewed for an additional five years. The lease includes seven additional five-year renewal options. The minimum lease payments are indexed to correspond to any rise or fall in the CPI, initially after the ten-year term of the lease or August 21, 2007 and thereafter, at each five year renewal date. Rent under the lease currently is the greater of $2.6 million (minimum rent) per year, or 3.25% of gross revenues, less complimentaries.

 

Boonville

 

We lease our 27 acre casino site in Boonville pursuant to a lease agreement with the City of Boonville. Under the terms of agreement, we lease the site for a period of ninety-nine years. In lieu of rent, we are assessed additional amounts by the City of Boonville based on a 3.5% tax on gaming revenue, up to $1.0 million, which we recognize as additional gaming taxes. We lease approximately 27 acres from the City of Boonville.

 

Caruthersville

 

We own approximately 37 acres, including our riverboat casino and 1,000 parking spaces in Caruthersville, Missouri.

 

Bettendorf

 

We own approximately 24.6 acres of land in Bettendorf, Iowa used in connection with the operations of our Bettendorf property. We also lease approximately eight acres of land on a month-to-month basis from an entity owned by family members of our chairman, Bernard Goldstein, including Robert S. Goldstein, our vice chairman and director and Jeffrey D. Goldstein, a director of our company, which we utilize for parking and warehouse space. The initial term of the lease expires sixty days after written notice is given to either party and rent under the lease is currently $23,360 per month.

 

Davenport

 

Pursuant to various lease agreements, we lease approximately twelve acres of land in Davenport, Iowa used in connection with the operations of Rhythm City-Davenport. The aggregate annual rent on these leases is approximately $300,000 and they have varying expiration dates through 2022.

 

Marquette

 

We lease the dock site in Marquette, Iowa that is used in connection with our Marquette operations. The lease expires in 2019, and annual rent under the lease is approximately $180,000, plus $1.00 per passenger, plus 2.5% of gaming revenues (less state wagering taxes) in excess of $20.0 million but less than $40.0 million; 5% of gaming revenues (less state wagering taxes) in excess of $40.0 million but less than $60.0 million; and 7.5% of gaming revenues (less state wagering taxes) in excess of $60.0 million. We also rent approximately two acres of land used for the employee parking lot that is a month-to-month rental of $417 and an easement related to an overhead pedestrian bridge and driveway that is an annual payment of approximately $6,300. We also own approximately 25 acres of land for the pavilion, hotel, satellite offices, warehouse, lots by the marina and other property.

 

Waterloo

 

The casino occupies approximately 30 acres of land, which we own. We also entered into a one-year lease agreement for 17,517 sq. ft. of warehouse space. Rent under this lease is currently $4,306 per month.

 

17



 

Black Hawk

 

We own approximately 10.1 acres of land in Black Hawk, Colorado for use in connection with our Black Hawk operations. The property leases an additional parcel of land adjoining the Isle of Capri Black Hawk where the Colorado Central Station Hotel and parking are located. This lease is for an initial term of nine years with options to renew for eighteen additional terms of five years each with the final option period concluding June 1, 2094. Annual rent is currently $1.8 million indexed to correspond to any rise or fall in the CPI at one-year intervals, not to exceed a 3% increase or decrease from the previous year’s rate.

 

The Colorado Central Station-Black Hawk

 

We own or lease approximately 7.1 acres of land in Black Hawk, Colorado for use in connection with the Colorado Central Station-Black Hawk. The property leases an additional parcel of land near the Colorado Central Station-Black Hawk for parking described above. This lease is for an initial term of ten years with options to renew for nine additional terms of ten years each with the final option period concluding August 2094. Currently the annual rent is $576,000 and renewals are subject to 20% rent increases over the rate of the previous term.

 

Pompano

 

We own approximately 223 acres at Pompano.

 

Our Lucaya

 

We lease the casino at Our-Lucaya under the terms of a two-year lease which commenced June 1, 2007. However, beginning in October 2007 the lease may be terminated by either party with six months notice. Annual rental payments under the lease are currently $1.9 million.

 

Blue Chip-Dudley

 

Through our two-thirds ownership interest in Blue Chip, plc, we own the approximately 12,000 square-foot building used for the Blue Chip-Dudley casino operation. We also own an 8,000 square-foot parking area for the casino.

 

Blue Chip-Wolverhampton

 

Through our two-thirds ownership interest in Blue Chip, plc, we own the approximately 12,000 square-foot building used for the Blue Chip-Wolverhampton casino operation. We also own a 2,000 square foot parking area for the casino.

 

Coventry

 

We entered into a 15 year lease agreement with renewal options for an additional 10 years during fiscal 2004 to lease approximately 116,000 square feet for a new casino in Coventry, England in the sub-level of the Arena Coventry Convention Center. The convention center was developed, owned and operated by a non-affiliated entity and began operations in August 2005. Due to certain structural elements installed during the construction of the space being leased and certain prepaid lease payments made by us, we are required to be treated, for accounting purposes only, as the “owner” of the Arena Coventry Convention Center, in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 97-10 (“EITF 97-10”), “The Effect of Lessee Involvement in Asset Construction,” even though we do not own these assets and do not participate in or control the operations of the convention center.

 

Other

 

We own all of the riverboats and barges utilized at our facilities. We also own or lease all of our gaming and non-gaming equipment.

 

We lease our corporate offices in Creve Coeur, Missouri, Biloxi, Mississippi, and Boca Raton, Florida.

 

We own additional property and have various property leases and options to either lease or purchase property that are not directly related to our existing operations and that may be utilized in the future in connection with expansion projects at our existing facilities or development of new projects.

 

18



 

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

Lady Luck Gaming Corporation (now our wholly owned subsidiary) and several joint venture partners have been defendants in the Greek Civil Court and the Greek Administrative Court in similar lawsuits brought by the country of Greece through its Minister of Tourism (now Development) and Finance.  The actions allege that the defendants failed to make specified payments in connection with the gaming license bid process for Patras, Greece. Although it is difficult to determine the damages being sought from the lawsuits, the action may seek damages up to that aggregate amount plus interest from the date of the action. Through April 27, 2008, we have accrued an estimated liability including interest of $8.9 million. The Athens Civil Court of First Instance granted judgment in our favor and dismissed the civil lawsuit. Appeals to both the Athens Civil Appeals Court and the Greek Civil Supreme Court have been dismissed. The Greek Civil Supreme Court denied the appeal on the basis that the Administrative Court is the competent court to hear the matter. During October 2005, after the administrative lawsuit had been dismissed by both the Athens Administrative Court of First Instance and the Athens Administrative Court of Appeals on the basis that the Administrative Court did not have a jurisdiction, the Administrative Supreme Court remanded the matter back to the Athens Administrative Appeals Court for a hearing on the merits, which court in May 2008 rendered judgment in our favor on procedural grounds and not on the merits. We expect the Greek government to appeal this decision to the Administrative Supreme Court.  Therefore, the outcome of this matter is still in doubt and cannot be predicted with any degree of certainty. We intend to continue a vigorous and appropriate defense to the claims asserted in this matter.

 

We are subject to certain federal, state and local environmental protection, health and safety laws, regulations and ordinances that apply to businesses generally, and are subject to cleanup requirements at certain of our facilities as a result thereof. We have not made, and do not anticipate making, material expenditures, nor do we anticipate incurring delays with respect to environmental remediation or protection. However, in part because our present and future development sites have, in some cases, been used as manufacturing facilities or other facilities that generate materials that are required to be remediated under environmental laws and regulations, there can be no guarantee that additional pre-existing conditions will not be discovered and that we will not experience material liabilities or delays.

 

We are subject to various contingencies and litigation matters and have a number of unresolved claims. Although the ultimate liability of these contingencies, this litigation and these claims cannot be determined at this time, we believe that they will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

 

There were no matters submitted to a vote of our security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year 2008.

 

19



 

PART II

 

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

(a)

i.                           Market Information . Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “ISLE”. The following table presents the high and low closing sales prices for our common stock as reported by the NASDAQ Global Select Market for the fiscal periods indicated.

 

 

 

High

 

Low

 

First Quarter (through July 8, 2008)

 

$

7.45

 

$

4.20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ending April 27, 2008

 

 

 

 

 

Fourth Quarter

 

$

11.57

 

$

6.62

 

Third Quarter

 

20.62

 

10.00

 

Second Quarter

 

21.44

 

18.17

 

First Quarter

 

25.56

 

21.51

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ending April 29, 2007

 

 

 

 

 

Fourth Quarter

 

$

29.07

 

$

24.70

 

Third Quarter

 

31.30

 

24.44

 

Second Quarter

 

25.25

 

19.30

 

First Quarter

 

33.01

 

23.32

 

 

ii.                        Holders of Common Stock . As of July 8, 2008, there were approximately 1,421 holders of record of our common stock.

 

iii.                     Dividends. We have never declared or paid any dividends with respect to our common stock and the current policy of our board of directors is to retain earnings to provide for the growth of our company. In addition, our senior secured credit facility and the indentures governing our 7% senior subordinated notes limit our ability to pay dividends. See “Item 8-Financial Statements and Supplementary Data-Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc.-Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements—Note 7.” Consequently, no cash dividends are expected to be paid on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Further, there can be no assurance that our current and proposed operations will generate the funds needed to declare a cash dividend or that we will have legally available funds to pay dividends. In addition, we may fund part of our operations in the future from indebtedness, the terms of which may prohibit or restrict the payment of cash dividends. If a holder of common stock is disqualified by the regulatory authorities from owning such shares, such holder will not be permitted to receive any dividends with respect to such stock. See “Item 1-Business-Governmental Regulations.”

 

iv.                    Equity Compensation Plans. The following table provides information about securities authorized for issuance under our 1993 and 2000 Employee Stock Option Plans, and our Deferred Bonus Plan, for the fiscal year 2008.

 

 

 

(a)

 

 

 

 

 

Plan category

 

Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options, warrants
and rights

 

(b)

Weighted-average exercise
price of outstanding options,
warrants and rights

 

(c)

Number of securities remaining available for
future issuance under equity compensation plans
(excluding securities reflected in column (a))

 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

 

3,832,346

 

$

18.15

 

350,043

 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

 

 

 

 

Total

 

3,832,346

 

$

18.15

 

350,043

 

 

20



 

(b)                   Issuance of Unregistered Securities

None.

 

(c)                    Purchases of our Common Stock

The following table provides information related to our purchases of Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. common stock:

 

Period

 

Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased

 

Average
Price Paid
per Share

 

Total Number of
Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Programs (1)

 

Maximum
Number of
Shares that May
Yet Be
Purchased
Under the
Programs (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

January 28, 2008 to February 24, 2008

 

 

$

 

 

1,104,208

 

February 25, 2008 to March 30, 2008

 

 

 

 

1,104,208

 

March 31, 2008 to April 27, 2008

 

 

 

 

1,104,208

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

1,104,208

 

 


  (1)          We have purchased our common stock under stock repurchase programs. These programs, allow for the repurchase of up to 6,000,000 shares. To date, we have purchased 4,895,792 shares of our common stock under these programs. These programs have no approved dollar amounts, nor expiration dates.

 

COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*

Among Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc., The NASDAQ Composite Index

And The Dow Jones US Gambling Index

 

 


* $100 invested on 4/27/03 In stock or 4/30/03 In Index-Including reinvestment of dividends. Indexes calculated on month-end basis.

 

21



 

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

 

The following table presents our selected consolidated financial data for the five most recent fiscal years, which is derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes to those statements. Because the data in this table does not provide all of the data contained in our consolidated financial statements, including the related notes, you should read “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” our consolidated financial statements, including the related notes contained elsewhere in this document and other data we have filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended (1)

 

 

 

April 27,

 

April 29,

 

April 30,

 

April 24,

 

April 25,

 

Statement of Operations

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

(dollars in millions, except per share data)

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Casino

 

$

1,121.9

 

$

1,015.6

 

$

1,004.1

 

$

957.6

 

$

948.9

 

Rooms

 

49.5

 

49.6

 

37.0

 

33.1

 

33.4

 

Pari-mutuel commissions and fees

 

19.1

 

20.0

 

20.5

 

20.1

 

20.3

 

Food, beverage and other

 

136.5

 

130.6

 

125.9

 

124.9

 

120.3

 

Gross revenues

 

1,327.0

 

1,215.9

 

1,187.5

 

1,135.6

 

1,122.9

 

Less promotional allowances

 

(201.6

)

(214.5

)

(200.2

)

(188.3

)

(183.4

)

Net revenues

 

1,125.4

 

1,001.4

 

987.3

 

947.3

 

939.5

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Casino

 

163.3

 

159.5

 

151.9

 

157.3

 

150.8

 

Gaming taxes

 

288.4

 

210.4

 

219.4

 

215.1

 

207.8

 

Rooms

 

12.0

 

9.8

 

8.5

 

7.5

 

7.5

 

Pari-mutuel

 

16.8

 

15.3

 

16.1

 

15.5

 

15.4

 

Food, beverage and other

 

45.5

 

32.3

 

31.5

 

29.9

 

26.5

 

Marine and facilities

 

68.0

 

60.2

 

57.0

 

56.3

 

53.5

 

Marketing and administrative

 

290.6

 

269.3

 

246.3

 

236.9

 

232.6

 

Corporate and development

 

49.0

 

57.2

 

57.8

 

41.0

 

32.9

 

Valuation and other charges

 

85.2

 

8.5

 

13.4

 

4.1

 

 

Preopening

 

6.5

 

13.6

 

0.3

 

0.2

 

2.3

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

136.1

 

99.5

 

88.8

 

80.5

 

76.9

 

Total operating expenses

 

1,161.4

 

935.6

 

891.0

 

844.3

 

806.2

 

Operating income (loss)

 

(36.0

)

65.8

 

96.3

 

103.0

 

133.3

 

Interest expense

 

(109.3

)

(89.2

)

(76.3

)

(65.0

)

(69.8

)

Interest income

 

3.8

 

7.5

 

2.7

 

1.6

 

0.5

 

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

 

(15.3

)

 

(2.1

)

(5.3

)

(14.1

)

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and minority interest

 

(156.8

)

(15.9

)

20.7

 

34.3

 

49.8

 

Income tax benefit (provision)

 

64.8

 

(1.9

)

(5.6

)

(11.3

)

(12.4

)

Minority interest

 

(4.9

)

(3.6

)

(6.5

)

(5.4

)

(10.0

)

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

(96.9

)

(21.3

)

8.6

 

17.6

 

27.4

 

Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

 

 

16.7

 

10.2

 

2.2

 

0.2

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(96.9

)

$

(4.6

)

$

18.9

 

$

19.7

 

$

27.7

 

 

22



 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended (1)

 

 

 

April 27,

 

April 29,

 

April 30,

 

April 24,

 

April 25,

 

Statement of Operations Data (continued):

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

(dollars in millions, except per share data)

 

Income (loss) per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

$

(3.16

)

$

(0.70

)

$

0.29

 

$

0.59

 

$

0.93

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

 

0.55

 

0.34

 

0.07

 

0.01

 

Net Income (loss)

 

$

(3.16

)

$

(0.15

)

$

0.63

 

$

0.66

 

$

0.94

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

$

(3.16

)

$

(0.70

)

$

0.28

 

$

0.57

 

$

0.90

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

 

0.55

 

0.32

 

0.07

 

0.01

 

Net Income (loss)

 

$

(3.16

)

$

(0.15

)

$

0.60

 

$

0.64

 

$

0.91

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating activities

 

$

133.4

 

$

70.9

 

$

86.7

 

$

169.6

 

$

174.0

 

Investing activities

 

$

(302.4

)

$

(197.3

)

$

(176.4

)

$

(213.8

)

$

(159.9

)

Financing activities

 

$

72.5

 

$

193.5

 

$

64.9

 

$

55.4

 

$

25.8

 

Capital expenditures*

 

$

190.5

 

$

451.4

 

$

224.4

 

$

187.9

 

$

151.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of slot machines (2)

 

15,756

 

14,484

 

12,875

 

12,672

 

12,702

 

Number of table games (2)

 

463

 

370

 

483

 

485

 

398

 

Number of hotel rooms (2)

 

3,107

 

2,672

 

2,652

 

2,129

 

2,082

 

Average daily occupancy rate (2)

 

71.2

%

79.2

%

81.7

%

84.8

%

83.7

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance Sheet Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

91.8

 

$

188.1

 

$

121.0

 

$

146.5

 

$

134.6

 

Total assets

 

$

1,974.2

 

$

2,075.7

 

$

1,877.7

 

$

1,735.5

 

$

1,547.6

 

Long-term debt, including current portion

 

$

1,507.3

 

$

1,418.0

 

$

1,219.1

 

$

1,153.8

 

$

1,086.5

 

Stockholders’ equity

 

$

188.0

 

$

281.8

 

$

280.2

 

$

260.1

 

$

238.3

 

 


*   Excludes: destroyed Biloxi casino barge of $7.4 million in fiscal 2005 and $36.8 million in fiscal 2006, and Biloxi temporary casino of $37.9 million in fiscal 2006 and discontinued operations of Vicksburg and Bossier City

 

(1)    Our fiscal year ended April 30, 2006 includes 53 weeks while all other fiscal years include 52 weeks. The operating results and data from continuing operations presented for fiscal years prior to fiscal year 2005 are not comparable to other fiscal years presented because they do not include the operating results of the Isle-Our Lucaya, which we opened on December 15, 2003, the Blue Chip-Dudley, which we acquired on November 28, 2003, the Blue Chip-Wolverhampton, which we opened on April 22, 2004, and the Blue Chip-Walsall, which we opened on September 23, 2004. The results of fiscal years 2004-2007 reflect Bossier City, Vicksburg and Colorado Grande-Cripple Creek as discontinued operations.  We opened new casino operations in Pompano, Waterloo, and Coventry in April 2007, June 2007, and July 2007, respectively.  We acquired our casino operations in Caruthersville in June 2007.

 

(2)    The results of fiscal years 2004-2007 reflect Bossier City, Vicksburg and Colorado Grande-Cripple Creek as discontinued operations.

 

23



 

ITEM 7.

 

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

You should read the following discussion together with the financial statements, including the related notes and the other financial information in this Form 10-K.

 

Executive Overview

 

We are a leading developer, owner and operator of branded gaming facilities and related lodging and entertainment facilities in regional markets in the United States and internationally. We have intentionally sought geographic diversity to limit the risks caused by weather, regional economic difficulties and local gaming authorities and regulations. We currently operate casinos in Mississippi, Louisiana, Missouri, Iowa, Colorado and Florida. Internationally we operate casinos in Coventry, Dudley and Wolverhampton, England and Freeport, Grand Bahamas. We also operate a harness racing track at our casino in Florida.

 

Our operating results have been affected by write-offs and other valuation charges, the acquisition or opening of new properties, dispositions of properties, losses from the early extinguishment of debt, pre-opening expenses and increases in competition.  This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with and giving consideration to the following:

 

Write-offs and Other Valuation Charges – As a result of continuing losses, a review of expected future operating trends and the current fair values or our long-lived assets in England, we recorded an impairment charge of $78.7 million related to long-lived assets of our UK operations as of our 2008 fiscal year end. The results from operations for the fiscal year 2008 also include $6.5 million of charges related to the termination of our plans to develop a new casino in west Harrison County, Mississippi and the cancellation of construction projects in Davenport, Iowa and Kansas City, Missouri.

 

Opening of New Properties - During fiscal year 2008, our operating results were impacted by the opening of the slot gaming facility at our Pompano Park facility in April 2007, the acquisition of our Caruthersville, Missouri casino in June 2007 and the opening of our Waterloo, Iowa and Coventry, England casinos in June 2007 and July 2007, respectively.

 

Acquisition of Minority Interest – On January 27, 2008, we acquired the 43% minority interest in our Black Hawk, Colorado casino properties for $64.8 million.

 

Losses from Early Extinguishment of Debt – We recorded a total of $15.3 million in losses associated with the early extinguishment of debt during fiscal year 2008, including a $9.0 million call premium paid to retire our 9% Senior Subordinated Notes, and $6.3 million of deferred finance costs associated with the retired debt instruments.

 

Pre-Opening Expenses - In fiscal year 2008, we opened our new Waterloo and Coventry properties. In late fiscal year 2007 we opened the slot gaming facility at our Pompano Park property.  For fiscal years 2008 and 2007, we recorded pre-opening expenses related to these properties in the amounts of $6.5 million and $13.6 million, respectively.

 

Increased Competition - Following the impact of Hurricane Katrina in the fall of 2005, our Mississippi properties in Biloxi and Natchez experienced strong revenue growth as a result of limited competition on the Gulf Coast. Since that time, the Gulf Coast has seen recovery in casino development which, combined with the closure of the Biloxi/Ocean Springs bridge through November 1, 2007, has significantly reduced our market share in Biloxi from their artificially high post-Katrina levels. Patron counts have decreased at our Natchez property as gaming patrons who were displaced by hurricanes have returned to the Gulf Coast.  In Louisiana, our Lake Charles property experienced higher gaming revenues in fiscal year 2007 due to the closure of competitors’ facilities as a result of Hurricane Rita.  Competition has reopened which has resulted in decreased gaming revenues at our Lake Charles property in fiscal year 2008.  Our Quad Cities (Bettendorf and Davenport) and Marquette properties have experienced increased competition in many of their feeder markets, which has continued to have a negative impact on gaming revenues at these properties.

 

Natchez Flooding – Our Natchez property was closed due to flooding for the last fourteen days of fiscal year 2008.

 

Impact of Smoking Restrictions – Our properties in Black Hawk have been negatively impacted by a smoking ban which went into effect on January 1, 2008.  Our Quad Cities properties have benefited from a similar smoking ban affecting competing casinos in Illinois.

 

24



 

Impact of the Economy – Our properties are subject to the impact of general economic conditions. Increases in gasoline prices  and other macro economic factors may impact the frequency of our customers’ visits and a decline in economic conditions in many of our markets may also affect our potential customers’ disposable income.

 

Results of Operations

 

Our results of operations for the fiscal years ended April 27, 2008, April 29, 2007 and April 30, 2006 reflect the consolidated operations of all of our subsidiaries and include the following properties: Lake Charles, Biloxi, Lula, Natchez, Kansas City, Boonville, Caruthersville, Bettendorf, Marquette, Waterloo, Davenport, Black Hawk, Colorado Central Station-Black Hawk, Our Lucaya, Blue Chip-Dudley, Blue Chip-Wolverhampton, Coventry, and Pompano Park. Fiscal years 2007 and 2006 results have been reclassified to reflect Vicksburg and the Bossier City which were sold on July 31, 2006, as discontinued operations.

 

Our fiscal year ends on the last Sunday in April. This fiscal year convention creates more comparability of our quarterly operations, by generally having an equal number of weeks (13) and weekend days (26) in each quarter. Periodically, this convention necessitates a 53-week year. The fiscal years ended April 27, 2008 and April 29, 2007 were 52-week years.   The fiscal year ended April 30, 2006 was a 53-week year.

 

We believe that our historical results of operations may not be indicative of our future results of operations because of the substantial present and expected future increase in competition for gaming customers in each of our markets, as new gaming facilities open and existing gaming facilities expand or enhance their facilities. We believe that our operating results may be materially affected by the economy and weather.

 

ISLE OF CAPRI CASINOS, INC.

(In thousands)

 

 

 

Net Revenues

 

Operating Income (Loss)

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

 

 

April 27,

 

April 29,

 

April 30,

 

April 27,

 

April 29,

 

April 30,

 

(in thousands)

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

Mississippi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Biloxi

 

$

90,586

 

$

147,825

 

$

100,790

 

$

(3,538

)

$

26,948

 

$

28,143

 

Natchez

 

35,707

 

40,864

 

46,135

 

7,412

 

9,391

 

12,230

 

Lula

 

75,399

 

83,068

 

85,731

 

11,034

 

4,231

 

12,089

 

Mississippi Total

 

201,692

 

271,757

 

232,656

 

14,908

 

40,570

 

52,462

 

Louisiana

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lakes Charles

 

159,470

 

170,751

 

161,912

 

22,380

 

22,079

 

19,952

 

Missouri

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kansas City

 

75,630

 

82,269

 

88,009

 

6,985

 

7,258

 

10,282

 

Boonville

 

79,816

 

81,156

 

74,519

 

19,485

 

17,884

 

17,060

 

Caruthersville (1)

 

26,857

 

 

 

2,574

 

 

 

Missouri Total

 

182,303

 

163,425

 

162,528

 

29,044

 

25,142

 

27,342

 

Iowa

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bettendorf

 

92,429

 

87,699

 

97,154

 

18,967

 

17,120

 

23,320

 

Davenport

 

52,681

 

60,483

 

69,007

 

8,650

 

8,094

 

10,435

 

Marquette

 

32,968

 

37,593

 

42,536

 

4,380

 

4,802

 

7,424

 

Waterloo (2)

 

64,650

 

 

 

2,314

 

(925

)

(329

)

Iowa Total

 

242,728

 

185,775

 

208,697

 

34,311

 

29,091

 

40,850

 

Colorado

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Black Hawk/Colorado

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Central Station

 

144,521

 

153,718

 

163,412

 

30,811

 

27,894

 

36,132

 

Florida

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pompano (2)

 

160,831

 

30,059

 

24,721

 

(7,749

)

(20,308

)

(2,550

)

International

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Blue Chip

 

9,435

 

8,898

 

8,221

 

(1,563

)

(2,282

)

(10,974

)

Coventry (2)

 

8,227

 

 

 

(98,485

)

(4,135

)

(1,324

)

Our Lucaya

 

15,548

 

16,777

 

25,349

 

(835

)

7,192

 

(2,201

)

International Total

 

33,210

 

25,675

 

33,570

 

(100,883

)

775

 

(14,499

)

Corporate and Other

 

597

 

234

 

(137

)

(58,902

)

(59,417

)

(63,217

)

 

 

$

1,125,352

 

$

1,001,394

 

$

987,359

 

$

(36,080

)

$

65,826

 

$

96,472

 

 


(1) Reflects results since the June 2007 acquisition effective date.

 

25



 

(2) Waterloo, Pompano, and Coventry opened for operations in June 2007, April 2007 and July 2007, respectively.

 

Note: The table excludes our Vicksburg and Bossier City properties which have been classified as discontinued operations.

 

Fiscal Year 2008 Compared to Fiscal Year 2007

 

Revenues

Revenues for the fiscal years ended 2008 and 2007 are as follows:

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

April 27,

 

April 29,

 

 

 

Percentage

 

(in thousands)

 

2008

 

2007

 

Variance

 

Variance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Casino

 

$

1,121,860

 

$

1,015,629

 

$

106,231

 

10.5

%

Rooms

 

49,498

 

49,584

 

(86

)

-0.2

%

Pari-mutuel commissions and fees

 

19,096

 

20,004

 

(908

)

-4.5

%

Food, beverage and other

 

136,481

 

130,635

 

5,846

 

4.5

%

Gross revenues

 

1,326,935

 

1,215,852

 

111,083

 

9.1

%

Less promotional allowances

 

(201,583

)

(214,458

)

12,875

 

6.0

%

Net revenues

 

$

1,125,352

 

$

1,001,394

 

123,958

 

12.4

%

 

Casino Revenues - Casino revenues increased $106.2 million, or 10.5%, compared to fiscal year 2007.  Our increased casino revenues were primarily a result of the opening or acquisition of new casino properties in Caruthersville, Waterloo, Pompano and Coventry, and increased casino revenues at Bettendorf driven by the opening of our new hotel in May 2007. Casino revenues from our new casino operations were $224.9 million for the fiscal year 2008. Same property casino revenues decreased $118.7 million for the fiscal year 2008. This included decreased casino revenues at Biloxi of $62.7 million for the fiscal year 2008, due to increased competition and post-hurricane normalization and at Lake Charles of $11.1 million for the fiscal year 2008, due to post-hurricane normalization and $11.5 million at our Black Hawk operations primarily due to planned reductions in our complimentary allowances and the impact of a state smoking ban at casinos effective January 2008.

 

Rooms Revenue - Rooms revenue decreased $0.1 million, or 0.2%, for the fiscal year 2008, compared to the fiscal year 2007. These revenues decreased in total at our Biloxi and Lula properties by $5.1 million for the fiscal year 2008, primarily related to increased competition and post-hurricane normalization and the closure since October of over 170 rooms in Lula for repair.  Rooms revenue increased $5.4 million in Iowa driven by the new hotel tower in Bettendorf and the opening of our Waterloo facility.

 

Pari-mutuel Commissions and Fees - Pari-mutuel commissions earned at Pompano Park for the fiscal year 2008 decreased $0.9 million, or 4.5% compared to the fiscal year 2007 due primarily to decreased wagering on simulcast races.

 

Food, Beverage and Other Revenues - Food, beverage and other revenues increased $5.8 million, or 4.5%, for the fiscal year 2008, compared to the fiscal year 2007.  Our increased food, beverage and other revenues were primarily a result of the opening or acquisition of new casino properties in Caruthersville, Waterloo, Pompano and Coventry. Considering the acquisition or opening of new properties for which our food, beverage and other revenues increased $24.0 million for the fiscal year 2008, same property food beverage and other revenues decreased $18.2 million for the fiscal year 2008. This included decreased food, beverage and other revenues at Biloxi of $9.2 million for the fiscal year 2008, due to increased competition and post-hurricane normalization, and at Lake Charles of $4.1 million for the fiscal year 2008, primarily due to the collection of $2.2 million in business interruption proceeds reflected in the prior year and post-hurricane normalization.

 

Promotional Allowances - Promotional allowances, which are made up of complimentaries, cash points and coupons, are rewards that we give our loyal customers to encourage them to continue to patronize our properties.   Promotional allowances decreased $12.9 million, or 6.0%, for the fiscal year 2008, compared to the fiscal year 2007.  Considering the acquisition or opening of new properties for which our promotional allowances increased $20.1 million for the fiscal year 2008, same property promotional allowances decreased $33.0 million for fiscal year 2008. Decreases in such promotional allowances reflect decreases in gross revenues at certain of our properties with Biloxi accounting for $18.2 million of the decrease for the fiscal year 2008, due to increased competition and post-hurricane normalization. Our decision to reduce certain marketing incentives to our less profitable customer segments has also reduced our overall promotional allowances.

 

26



 

Operating Expenses

 

Operating expenses for the fiscal years 2008 and 2007 are as follows:

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

April 27,

 

April 29,

 

 

 

Percentage

 

(in thousands)

 

2008

 

2007

 

Variance

 

Variance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Casino

 

$

163,250

 

$

159,534

 

$

3,716

 

2.3

%

Gaming taxes

 

288,402

 

210,404

 

77,998

 

37.1

%

Rooms

 

12,031

 

9,811

 

2,220

 

22.6

%

Pari-mutuel commissions and fees

 

16,834

 

15,342

 

1,492

 

9.7

%

Food, beverage and other

 

45,538

 

32,262

 

13,276

 

41.2

%

Marine and facilities

 

68,044

 

60,174

 

7,870

 

13.1

%

Marketing and administrative

 

290,591

 

269,279

 

21,312

 

7.9

%

Corporate and development

 

48,974

 

57,217

 

(8,243

)

-14.4

%

Write-offs and other valuation charges

 

85,184

 

8,466

 

76,718

 

906.2

%

Pre-opening

 

6,457

 

13,573

 

(7,116

)

-52.4

%

Depreciation and amortization

 

136,127

 

99,506

 

36,621

 

36.8

%

Total operating expenses

 

$

1,161,432

 

$

935,568

 

225,864

 

24.1

%

 

Casino - Casino operating expenses increased $3.7 million, or 2.3%, for fiscal year 2008 compared to fiscal year 2007. Considering the acquisition or opening of new properties for which our casino expenses increased $27.0 million for fiscal year 2008, same property casino expenses decreased $23.3 million for fiscal year 2008.  Overall casino expenses for fiscal year 2008 compared to fiscal year 2007, decreased in proportion to casino revenue from 15.7% to 14.6%.

 

Gaming Taxes - State and local gaming taxes increased $78.0 million, or 37.1%, for fiscal year 2008, as compared to the prior fiscal year.  Considering the acquisition or opening of new properties for which our gaming taxes increased $92.4 million for fiscal year 2008, same property gaming taxes decreased $14.4 million for fiscal year 2008.  This decrease in same property gaming taxes for the comparative fiscal years 2008 and 2007 corresponds to the reductions in gaming revenues.  The effective rate for gaming taxes as a percentage of gaming revenue increased from 20.7% to 25.7% for the fiscal year 2008, due to an increase in the mix of gaming revenues derived from jurisdictions with higher gaming tax rates including Florida and England, partially offset by decreased gaming revenues in Mississippi.

 

Rooms - Rooms expense increased $2.2 million, or 22.6% for the fiscal year 2008 as compared to the fiscal year 2007.  Rooms expense reflects increased room capacity due to the opening of the Waterloo property hotel and the Bettendorf property hotel expansion.  These expenses directly relate to the cost of providing hotel rooms.  A reduction in complimentary hotel rooms provided to our customers also increases our rooms expense as the cost of rooms expense allocated to casino expense is reduced.

 

Pari-mutuel Commissions and Fees - Pari-mutuel operating costs of the Pompano Park property increased $1.5 million for the fiscal year 2008 compared to fiscal year 2007. Such costs consist primarily of compensation, benefits, purses, simulcast fees and other direct costs of track operations.

 

Food, Beverage and Other - Food, beverage and other expenses increased $13.3 million, or 41.2% in fiscal year 2008 as compared to fiscal year 2007. Same property food, beverage and other expenses decreased $2.8 million for fiscal year 2008.  This decrease in same property food, beverage and other expenses for fiscal year 2008, reflects reductions in our food, beverage and other revenues.

 

Marine and Facilities - These expenses include salaries, wages and benefits of the marine and facilities departments, operating expenses of the marine crews, insurance, maintenance of public areas, housekeeping and general maintenance of the riverboats and pavilions. Marine and facilities expenses increased $7.9 million, or 13.1%, in fiscal year 2008. Same property marine and facilities expenses decreased $3.5 million for fiscal year 2008. This decrease in same property marine and facilities expenses for fiscal year 2008 as compared to fiscal year 2007 is primarily the result of staff reductions and labor cost management.

 

Marketing and Administrative - These expenses include salaries, wages and benefits of the marketing and sales departments, as well as promotions, direct mail, advertising, special events and entertainment. Administrative expenses include

 

27



 

administration and human resource department expenses, rent, professional fees and property taxes.  Marketing and administrative expenses increased $21.3 million, or 7.9%, in fiscal year 2008 compared to fiscal year 2007.  Same property marketing and administrative expenses decreased $32.4 million for fiscal year 2008. This decrease in same property marketing and administrative expenses for fiscal year 2008 reflects our decision to reduce marketing costs to less profitable customer marketing segments and to reduce our administrative costs.

 

Corporate and Development - During fiscal year 2008, our corporate and development expenses were $49.0 million compared to $57.2 million for fiscal year 2007. This overall decrease in corporate and development expenses is due primarily to fiscal year 2007 including $16.2 million in development expenses primarily associated with development opportunities in Pittsburgh and Singapore.

 

Write-offs and Other Valuation Charges – As a result of continuing losses, a review of expected future operating trends and the current fair values or our long-lived assets in Coventry, England, we have recorded an impairment charge of $78.0 million related to long-lived assets of our Coventry operations as of our 2008 fiscal year end. Additionally, we recognized $6.5 million in impairment charges for fiscal year 2008 primarily related to the write-off of costs related to the termination of our plans to develop a new casino in west Harrison County, Mississippi, the write-off of construction projects we decided to terminate in Davenport, and Kansas City, and $0.7 million for impairment of long-lived assets at our Blue Chip operations.  During fiscal year 2007, we recognized an $8.5 million impairment charge relating to goodwill at Lula, Mississippi and real property at Blue Chip.

 

Pre-opening - Pre-opening expenses for fiscal year 2008 included $3.4 million, $2.8 million and $0.3 million for Waterloo, Coventry and Pompano, respectively. Pre-opening expenses during fiscal year 2007 included $10.6 million, $2.1 million, and $0.9 million for our Pompano Park, Coventry, and Waterloo properties, respectively.

 

Depreciation and Amortization - Depreciation and amortization expense for fiscal year 2008 increased $36.6 million, or 36.8% due primarily to our hotel expansion at our Bettendorf property, the acquisition of Caruthersville, the opening of our Waterloo and Coventry properties, and the opening of the slot gaming facility at our Pompano property.  Depreciation and amortization expense at our new casino properties increased by $33.0 million compared to fiscal year 2007.

 

Other Income (Expense), Income Taxes, Minority Interest and Discontinued Operations

 

Interest expense, interest income, loss on early extinguishment of debt, income tax (provision) benefit, minority interest and income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes for the fiscal years 2008 and 2007 are as follows:

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

April 27,

 

April 29,

 

 

 

Percentage

 

(in thousands)

 

2008

 

2007

 

Variance

 

Variance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

$

(109,286

)

$

(89,150

)

$

(20,136

)

22.6

%

Interest income

 

3,814

 

7,469

 

(3,655

)

-48.9

%

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

 

(15,274

)

 

(15,274

)

100.0

%

Income tax (provision) benefit

 

64,820

 

(1,906

)

66,726

 

-3500.8

%

Minority interest

 

(4,868

)

(3,568

)

(1,300

)

36.4

%

Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

 

 

16,692

 

(16,692

)

-100.0

%

 

Interest Expense - Interest expense increased $20.1 million for fiscal year 2008 compared to fiscal year 2007.  This increase is primarily attributable to higher debt balances under our Senior Secured Credit Facilities to fund acquisitions, and property and equipment additions.

 

Interest Income - During fiscal year 2008, our interest income was $3.8 million compared to $7.5 million for fiscal year 2007.  The change in interest income reflects changes in our invested cash balances and interest rates.

 

Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt – Our loss included the $9.0 million call premium from the early redemption of our $200.0 million 9% Senior Subordinated Notes at 104.5% and a write-off of the related deferred financing costs of $2.4 million. Additionally, during the first quarter of fiscal year 2008, we replaced our February 2005 Credit Facility with our July 2007 Credit Facility resulting in a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $2.3 million from the write-off of deferred financing costs. In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008, we retired the Isle of Capri Black Hawk’s Senior Secured Credit Facility resulting in a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $1.6 million from the write-off of deferred financing costs.  These transactions resulted in a total loss on early extinguishment of debt of $15.3 million for fiscal year 2008.

 

28



 

Income Tax (Provision) Benefit – Our income tax (provision) benefit is and thus our effective income tax rate has been impacted by interim changes in our estimate of annual taxable income for financial statement purposes as well as our percentage of permanent items in relation to such estimated income or loss.  Effective income tax rates were as follows:

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

 

 

April 27,

 

April 29,

 

 

 

2008

 

2007

 

Continuing operations

 

41.33

%

-12.02

%

Total

 

41.33

%

108.20

%

 

Minority Interests - During fiscal year 2008, our minority interest expense was $4.9 million, compared to $3.6 million for fiscal year 2007.  Minority interests are recorded for our minority partner’s interest in our Colorado.  Following our acquisition of the remaining interest in our Colorado operations, we no longer record a minority interest for such operations.

 

Income From Discontinued Operations - On July 31, 2006, we completed the sale of our Bossier City and Vicksburg properties.  Income from discontinued operations for fiscal year 2007 includes pretax operating income of $5.6 million, and we also recorded a gain on sale of discontinued operations of $23.3 million during fiscal 2007.  Income tax provision for fiscal year 2007 was $12.2 million, resulting in income from discontinued operations of $16.7 million.

 

Fiscal Year 2007 Compared to Fiscal Year 2006

 

Note: Our 2006 fiscal year included 53 weeks of operations while our 2007 fiscal year included 52 weeks of operations.

 

Revenues

 

Revenues for the fiscal years 2007 and 2006 are as follows:

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

April 29,

 

April 30,

 

 

 

Percentage

 

(in thousands)

 

2007

 

2006

 

Variance

 

Variance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Casino

 

$

1,015,629

 

$

1,004,143

 

$

11,486

 

1.1

%

Rooms

 

49,584

 

36,999

 

12,585

 

34.0

%

Pari-mutuel commissions and fees

 

20,004

 

20,534

 

(530

)

-2.6

%

Food, beverage and other

 

130,635

 

125,857

 

4,778

 

3.8

%

Gross revenues

 

1,215,852

 

1,187,533

 

28,319

 

2.4

%

Less promotional allowances

 

(214,458

)

(200,174

)

(14,284

)

-7.1

%

Net revenues

 

$

1,001,394

 

$

987,359

 

14,035

 

1.4

%

 

Casino Revenues - Casino revenues increased $11.5 million or 1.1% in fiscal year 2007 compared to fiscal year 2006. We experienced an increase in casino revenues at Biloxi due to limited competition in the Biloxi market in the early part of the 2007 fiscal year and our 2006 fiscal year four month closure due to Hurricane Katrina. Similarly, Lake Charles experienced an increase in casino revenues from the prior year due to closure during fiscal year 2006 for 16 days resulting from Hurricane Rita and the closure of a competitor in the market. Boonville’s casino revenues increased as compared to the 2006 fiscal year due to increased gaming patrons who we believe were attracted by the opening of the new hotel. Also, casino revenues at Pompano increased due to the opening of the new casino and increased marketing efforts. These increases were offset by decreases in casino revenues at other properties including decreases at our Colorado, Iowa and Kansas City properties in each case primarily due to increased competition and in some cases severe weather in the 2007 fiscal year as compared to 2006. Casino revenues also decreased at Lucaya primarily due to a decline in tourists on the island and reduced marketing spending as we had been preparing to close this operation. Natchez saw a decrease in revenues in 2007 as compared to 2006, mostly due to the re-opening of casinos on the Mississippi Gulf Coast following the hurricanes.

 

Rooms Revenue - Rooms revenue increased $12.6 million in fiscal year 2007 compared to fiscal year 2006 primarily resulting from the increased capacity at Biloxi, Black Hawk, and the new hotel at Boonville.

 

Pari-mutuel - Pari-mutuel commissions and fees earned at Pompano Park in Florida for the 2007 fiscal year decreased $0.5 million or 2.6% compared to the prior year due primarily to decreases in wagering.

 

29



 

Food, beverage and other revenues - Food, beverage and other revenues increased by $4.8 million primarily due to an increase at Biloxi resulting from its 2006 fiscal year four month closure and limited competition in the market during the early part of the 2007 fiscal year.

 

Promotional Allowances - Promotional allowances, which are made up of complimentary revenues, cash points and coupons are rewards that we give our loyal customers to encourage them to continue to patronize our properties. These allowances increased by $14.3 million in fiscal year 2007 compared to fiscal year 2006 primarily due to increased marketing efforts to address heightened competition in several of our markets.

 

Operating Expenses

 

Operating expenses for the fiscal years 2007 and 2006 are as follows:

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

April 29,

 

April 30,

 

 

 

Percentage

 

(in thousands)

 

2007

 

2006

 

Variance

 

Variance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Casino

 

$

159,534

 

$

151,860

 

$

7,674

 

5.1

%

Gaming taxes

 

210,404

 

219,365

 

(8,961

)

-4.1

%

Rooms

 

9,811

 

8,463

 

1,348

 

15.9

%

Pari-mutuel commissions and fees

 

15,342

 

16,051

 

(709

)

-4.4

%

Food, beverage and other

 

32,262

 

31,530

 

732

 

2.3

%

Marine and facilities

 

60,174

 

56,993

 

3,181

 

5.6

%

Marketing and administrative

 

269,279

 

246,334

 

22,945

 

9.3

%

Corporate and development

 

57,217

 

57,803

 

(586

)

-1.0

%

Write-offs and other valuation charges

 

8,466

 

13,388

 

(4,922

)

-36.8

%

Pre-opening

 

13,573

 

281

 

13,292

 

4730.2

%

Depreciation and amortization

 

99,506

 

88,819

 

10,687

 

12.0

%

Total operating expenses

 

$

935,568

 

$

890,887

 

44,681

 

5.0

%

 

Casino - Casino operating expenses increased $7.7 million in fiscal year 2007 over fiscal year 2006. These expenses are primarily comprised of salaries, wages and benefits and other operating expenses of the casinos. This increase was primarily due to increases in Biloxi’s operating costs related to increased gaming volumes over the prior year and the opening of additional gaming space in the current year.

 

Gaming Taxes - State and local gaming taxes decreased by $9.0 million in fiscal year 2007 compared to fiscal year 2006 primarily due to a reversal of $6.9 million in previously accrued gaming taxes at our Lucaya property following a fiscal year 2007 amendment reducing the statutory gaming tax rate retroactively back to December 2003.

 

Rooms - Room expenses increased $1.3 million in fiscal year 2007 compared to fiscal year 2006. These expenses directly relate to the cost of providing hotel rooms. Other costs of the hotels are shared with the casinos and are presented in their respective expense categories. The increase in expenses was primarily due to Biloxi and Lake Charles having been closed for a portion of the prior year due to hurricanes, the new hotel at Boonville and the hotel expansion at Black Hawk.

 

Pari-mutuel Commissions and Fees - Pari-mutuel operating costs of Pompano Park in Florida decreased 4.4% in fiscal year 2007 compared to fiscal year 2006. Such costs consist primarily of compensation, benefits, purses, simulcast fees and other direct costs of track operations.

 

Food, Beverage and Other - Food, beverage and other expenses increased $0.7 million in fiscal year 2007 as compared to fiscal year 2006. Food and beverage expenses as a percentage of gross food and beverage revenues decreased from 25.1% for fiscal year 2006, to 24.7% for the fiscal year 2007. These expenses consist primarily of the cost of goods sold, salaries, wages and benefits and other operating expenses of these departments. The improved margin percentage relates to continuing cost control efforts. These gross expenses increased primarily due to increased food and beverage revenues in fiscal 2007 caused by Biloxi being closed for four months in fiscal year 2006 due to Hurricane Katrina, which was offset by decreased expenses at the Colorado and Iowa properties as a result of decreased food and beverage sales due to increased competition in those markets.

 

Marine and Facilities - Marine and facilities expenses increased $3.2 million in fiscal year 2007 compared to fiscal year 2006. These expenses include salaries, wages and benefits of the marine and facilities departments, operating expenses of the

 

30



 

marine crews, insurance, maintenance of public areas, housekeeping and general maintenance of the riverboats and pavilions. The increase was primarily due to closure of Biloxi in the prior year due to Hurricane Katrina, the closure of Lake Charles in fiscal year 2006 due to Hurricane Rita and expanded facilities at Pompano Park in Florida.

 

Marketing and Administrative - Marketing expenses increased 2.2% in fiscal year 2007 compared to fiscal year 2006. The increase in marketing expenses is primarily related to increased revenues and increased marketing efforts to address increased competition in several of our markets. Marketing expenses include salaries, wages and benefits of the marketing and sales departments, as well as promotions, direct mail, advertising, special events and entertainment.

 

Administrative expenses increased 7.1% in fiscal year 2007 over fiscal year 2006. These expenses include administration and human resource department expenses, rent, new development activities, professional fees, insurance and property taxes. The increase is due primarily to the closure of Biloxi in the fiscal year 2006 due to Hurricane Katrina, the closure of Lake Charles in fiscal year 2006 due to Hurricane Rita, increased property insurance expense at all of our properties, stock compensation expense, and corporate relocation expense.

 

Corporate and Development – During fiscal year 2007, our corporate and development expenses were $57.2 million compared to $57.8 million for fiscal year 2006. During fiscal 2007 we adopted FAS 123(R) resulting in an increase in corporate expenses of $5.6 million for stock compensation expense which was offset primarily by a $4.1 decrease in development costs.

 

Write-offs and Other Valuation Charges - We recorded valuation charges in fiscal year 2007 of $8.5 million relating to goodwill impairment at Lula of $7.8 million and due to an asset impairment charge on real property at Blue Chip of $0.7 million. In fiscal year 2006 we recorded valuation charges at Lucaya of $3.6 million due to the change in expected cash flows resulting from our previous decision to close the casino. Subsequently, in April 2007, our Board of Directors approved agreements with its landlord and the Government of the Bahamas, which allowed the casino to remain open; however, the impairment charge was not reversed in 2007. Additionally in fiscal year 2006 we recorded valuation charges totaling $9.8 million, including $9.2 million related to goodwill and intangible asset impairment and $0.6 million in fixed asset impairment related to our Blue Chip operations.

 

Pre-opening - Pre-opening expenses during fiscal year 2007 included $10.5 million, $2.1 million, and $0.9 million for our Pompano Park, Coventry, and Waterloo properties.

 

Depreciation and Amortization - Depreciation expense increased by $10.7 million in fiscal year 2007 compared to fiscal year 2006. Depreciation has increased primarily due to new property additions at our Colorado and the Biloxi properties, the new hotel at Boonville, and additional depreciation for the capitalization of the Coventry Arena Convention Center.

 

Other Income (Expense), Income Taxes, Minority Interest and Discontinued Operations

 

Interest expense, interest income, loss on early extinguishment of debt, income tax (provision) benefit, minority interest and income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes for the fiscal years 2007 and 2006 are as follows:

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

April 29,

 

April 30,

 

 

 

Percentage

 

(in thousands)

 

2007

 

2006

 

Variance

 

Variance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

$

(89,150

)

$

(76,335

)

$

(12,815

)

16.8

%

Interest income

 

7,469

 

2,694

 

4,775

 

177.2

%

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

 

 

(2,110

)

2,110

 

-100.0

%

Income tax (provision) benefit

 

(1,906

)

(5,628

)

3,722

 

-66.1

%

Minority interest

 

(3,568

)

(6,462

)

2,894

 

-44.8

%

Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

 

16,692

 

10,244

 

6,448

 

62.9

%

 

Interest Expense - Net interest expense increased $12.8 million in fiscal year 2007 compared to fiscal year 2006. This is attributable to higher interest rates and higher debt balances on our senior secured credit facility.

 

Interest Income - During fiscal year 2007, our interest income was $7.5 million compared to $2.7 million for fiscal year 2006.  The change in interest income reflects changes in our invested cash balances and interest rates.

 

31



 

Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt – Pursuant to the amendment of a debt agreement during fiscal year 2006, Isle of Capri Black Hawk, L.L.C. recognized a loss on the early extinguishment of debt of $2.1 million due to the write-off of previously deferred financing costs.

 

Income Tax (Provision) Benefit – Our income tax (provision) benefit is and thus our effective income tax rate has been impacted by interim changes in our estimate of annual taxable income for financial statement purposes as well as our percentage of permanent items in relation to such estimated income or loss.  Effective income tax rates were as follows:

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

 

 

April 29,

 

April 30,

 

 

 

2007

 

2006

 

Continuing operations

 

-12.02

%

27.16

%

Total

 

108.20

%

39.37

%

 

Minority Interests – During fiscal year 2007, our minority interest expense was $3.6 million, compared to $6.5 million for fiscal year 2006.  Minority interests are recorded for our minority partner’s interest in our Colorado.

 

Income From Discontinued Operations - Income from discontinued operations for fiscal year 2007 includes pretax operating income from our Bossier City and Vicksburg properties of $5.6 million, and we also recorded a gain on sale of discontinued operations of $23.3 million during fiscal 2007.  Income tax provision for fiscal year 2007 was $12.2 million, resulting in income from discontinued operations of $16.7 million. Income from discontinued operations for fiscal year 2006 includes pretax operating income from these same properties of $16.8 million. Income tax provision for fiscal year 2006 was $6.6 million, resulting in income from discontinued operations of $10.2 million.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities - During the fiscal year ended April 27, 2008, we provided $133.4 million in cash flows from operating activities compared to providing $70.9 million during the fiscal year ended April 29, 2007.  The increase in cash flows from operating activities is primarily due to the collection of $48.4 million in insurance receivables.

 

Cash Flows used in Investing Activities - During the fiscal year ended April 27, 2008 we used $302.4 million for investing activities compared to using $197.3 million during the fiscal year ended April 29, 2007.  Significant investing activities for the fiscal year ended April 27, 2008 included the acquisition of the remaining 43% minority interest in our Black Hawk, Colorado casino properties for $64.8 million, the acquisition of our Caruthersville casino for $43.3 million and purchases of property and equipment of $190.5 million.

 

For the fiscal year ended April 29, 2007, significant investing activities included the purchase of property and equipment for $451.4 million offset by the proceeds from the sale of our Bossier City and Vicksburg properties totaling $238.7 million.

 

Cash Flows from Financing Activities - During the fiscal year ended April 27, 2008 our net cash flows from financing activities were $72.5 million primarily including:

 

·                   Borrowings under our new July 2007 Credit Facility used to:

 

i.                 extinguish and repay the February 2005 Credit Facility including revolving loans and term loans totaling $503.5 million;

ii.              extinguish and repay our $200.0 million, 9% Senior Subordinated notes plus a call premium of $9.0 million; and

iii.           fund our $64.8 million acquisition of the 43% minority interest in our Black Hawk, Colorado casino properties and refinance approximately $195 million of indebtedness under the Black Hawk Credit Facility.

 

·                   Payments of deferred financing costs of $8.9 million primarily associated with our new credit facility.

·                   Proceeds from the exercise of stock options of $5.7 million.

 

During the fiscal year ended April 29, 2007, our net cash flows from financing activities were $193.5 million primarily including:

 

·   Net borrowings under our February 2005 Credit Facility of $207.0 million.

·   Repurchased 447,308 shares of our common stock at an average price of $23.28 per share for an aggregate of $10.4 million.

 

32



 

·   Proceeds from the exercise of stock options of $5.6 million.

·   Payments under the Isle-Black Hawk’s senior secured credit facility of $6.1 million.

 

Availability of Cash and Additional Capital - At April 27, 2008, we had cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities of $110.3 million.

 

As of April 27, 2008, we had $130.5 million in revolving credit and $869.3 million in term loans outstanding under the $1.35 billion credit facility. Our net line of credit availability at April 27, 2008 was approximately $170.0 million. Our July 2007 Credit Facility can be increased by $300.0 million, subject to syndication and covenant flexibility, through additional borrowings  “greenshoe” provisions. Exercise of the greenshoe provisions could result in resetting the Credit Facility interest rates to current market conditions.

 

The revolving loan commitment on the July 2007 Credit Facility is a variable rate instrument based on, at our option, LIBOR or our lender’s prime rate plus the applicable interest rate spread, and is effective through July 2012. The average rate on our outstanding borrowings under the July 2007 Credit Facility was approximately 6.55% at April 27, 2008. From time to time we enter into various swap agreements to hedge against future interest rate increases.  As of April 27, 2008, we have outstanding swap agreements which have fixed LIBOR (before the applicable spread) at a weighted average rate of 4.65% for $450 million of our debt with maturity dates ranging from 2010 to 2012.

 

We are highly leveraged and our debt agreements contain covenants which may restrict our ability to borrow funds. Our July 2007 Credit Facility includes a number of affirmative and negative covenants, including certain financial covenants including maintenance of a leverage ratio and minimum interest coverage ratio. The July 2007 Credit Facility also restricts our ability to make certain investments or distributions. The indenture governing our 7% Senior Subordinated Notes limits, among other things, our ability and our restricted subsidiaries ability to borrow money, make restricted payments, use assets as security in other transactions, enter into transactions with affiliates or pay dividends on or repurchase stock. The indenture also limits our ability to issue and sell capital stock of subsidiaries, sell assets in excess of specified amounts or merge with or into other companies.

 

While we believe that existing cash, cash flow from operations and available borrowings under our existing credit facilities will be sufficient to support our working capital needs, planned capital expenditures and debt service requirements for the foreseeable future, there is no assurance that these sources will in fact provide adequate funding for our planned capital expenditures. As a result, limitations on our capital resources could delay or cause us to abandon certain plans for capital improvements at our existing properties and/or development of new properties, which could place us at a competitive disadvantage. If so we may need to access additional debt or equity financing which may not be available on acceptable terms. We will continue to evaluate our planned capital expenditures at each of our existing locations in light of the operating performance of the facilities at such locations.

 

Capital Expenditures - Historically, we have made significant investments in property and equipment and expect that our operations will continue to demand ongoing investments to keep our properties competitive. Our current planned capital expenditures over the next 18 to 24 months are estimated as follows:

 

·                   $40 million in maintenance capital expenditures for fiscal year 2009.

·                   $16 million to $18 million to re-brand our properties in Davenport, Lula, Marquette and Caruthersville as Lady Luck properties during fiscal year 2009.

·                   $160 million for the rebuilding and refurbishment of our Biloxi property which we plan to begin as soon as we determine the timing of the settlement of our Hurricane Katrina insurance claims and continued review of our credit availability.  This project is expected to extend into fiscal year 2011.  The Biloxi project is expected to include a new single-level casino, restoration of our convention space, new food venues and renovation of the hotel rooms in the south tower.

 

Additional capital expenditures for renovation of up to 1,200 additional hotel rooms are under design and cost review.  The timing and amount of our capital expenditures is subject to the availability of cash under our Credit Facility, the timing of additional insurance proceeds and cash flows from our continuing operations.

 

Future Development and Other Projects: Our primary focus for fiscal year 2009 and beyond is on organic growth opportunities at our existing properties; however, as part of our business development activities, from time to time we may enter into agreements which could result in the acquisition or development of businesses or assets.  Our business development efforts and related agreements may require the expenditure of cash.  The amount and timing of our cash expenditures may vary based upon our evaluation of development opportunities.

 

33



 

Our development plans are subject to a variety of factors including but not limited to: obtaining permits, licenses and approvals from appropriate regulatory and other agencies, legislative changes and, in certain circumstances, negotiating acceptable leases .

 

Critical Accounting Estimates

 

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles that require our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and related disclosures. Management identifies critical accounting estimates as:

 

·                   those that require the use of assumptions about matters that are inherently and highly uncertain at the time the estimates are made;

·                   those estimates where, had we chosen different estimates or assumptions, the resulting differences would have had a material impact on our financial condition, changes in financial condition or results of operations; and

·                   those estimates that, if they were to change from period to period, likely would result in a material impact on our  financial condition, changes in financial condition or results of operations.

 

Based upon management’s discussion of the development and selection of these critical accounting estimates with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors, we believe the following accounting estimates involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity.

 

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets - At April 27, 2008, we had goodwill and other intangible assets of $396.9 million, representing 20.1% of total assets.  Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”), requires goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite useful lives be tested for impairment annually or more frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that may reduce the fair value of our goodwill and other intangible assets below their carrying value.  For properties with goodwill and/or other intangible assets with indefinite lives, this test requires the comparison of the implied fair value of each property to carrying value.  The implied fair value includes estimates of future cash flows that are based on reasonable and supportable assumptions and represent our best estimates of the cash flows expected to result from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition.  Changes in estimates or application of alternative assumptions and definitions could produce significantly different results.

 

During the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, we engage an independent third party valuation firm to conduct annual impairment testing under SFAS 142.  As a result of this annual impairment testing we recorded a $7.8 million write-down of goodwill at Lula during fiscal year 2007.

 

Property and Equipment - At April 27, 2008, we had property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $1,329.0 million, representing 67.3% of total assets.  We capitalize the cost of property and equipment.  Maintenance and repairs that neither materially add to the value of the property nor appreciably prolong its life are charged to expense as incurred.  We depreciate property and equipment on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives.  The estimated useful lives are based on the nature of the assets as well as our current operating strategy.  Future events such as property expansions, new competition, changes in technology and new regulations could result in a change in the manner in which we are using certain assets requiring a change in the estimated useful lives of such assets.

 

Impairment of Long-lived Assets - We evaluate long-lived assets for impairment using Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“SFAS 144”), which addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. In assessing the recoverability of the carrying value of property, equipment and other long-lived assets, we make assumptions regarding future cash flows and residual values.  If these estimates or the related assumptions are not achieved or change in the future, we may be required to record an impairment loss for these assets.  In evaluating impairment of long-lived assets for newly opened operations, estimates of future cash flows and residual values may require some period of actual results to provide the basis for an opinion of future cash flows and residual values used in the determination of an impairment loss for these assets.  Such an impairment loss would be recognized as a non-cash component of operating income.

 

During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008, we engaged an independent third party valuation firm to conduct an appraisal of our long-lived assets associated with our Coventry, England due to the continuation of losses from operations, a review of expected future operating trends and the current fair values of our long-lived assets in Coventry.  Based upon this appraisal, we recorded an impairment charge of $78.0 million relating to the write-down of long-lived assets at our Coventry, England operations as of the end of fiscal 2008.

 

34



 

Self-Insurance Liabilities - We are self-funded up to a maximum amount per claim for our employee-related health care benefits program, workers’ compensation insurance and general liability insurance.  Claims in excess of this maximum are fully insured through a stop-loss insurance policy.  We accrue a discounted estimate for workers’ compensation insurance and general liabilities based on claims filed and estimates of claims incurred but not reported. We rely on independent consultants to assist in the determination of estimated accruals.  While the estimated cost of claims incurred depends on future developments, such as increases in health care costs, in our opinion, recorded reserves are adequate to cover future claims payments.

 

Insurance Accounting - We have insurance coverage related to damage from three hurricanes for property damage incurred, property operating costs during the operational downtime of the hurricanes, incremental costs incurred related to hurricane damage and recovery activities and business interruption insurance for lost profits during the period directly related to the hurricanes.  The insurance claim is subject to the use of estimates and negotiations with our insurance carriers.  The total amount of impairments, losses recognized and expenses incurred have been recorded in our statement of operations as “Marketing and administrative” and have been offset by the amount we believe is probable to be collected from our insurance carriers under our policy coverages.  We have received partial proceeds from our insurance carriers related to the losses we have sustained, and through April 27, 2008 have received advances of $153.8 million.  At April 27, 2008 we have an insurance receivable relating to our hurricane claim of $7.6 million and additional claims pending in excess of our receivable.  When we reach agreement with our insurance carriers on the final amount of the insurance proceeds we are entitled to, we will also record any related gain in excess of any remaining insurance receivable.  Our insurance policies also provide coverage for the loss of profits caused by the storms.  Any lost profit recoveries will be recognized when agreed to with our insurance carriers and will be reflected in the related properties’ revenues.

 

Income Tax Assets and Liabilities - We account for income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS 109”). SFAS 109 requires that we recognize a current tax asset or liability for the estimated taxes payable or refundable based upon application of the enacted tax rates to taxable income in the current year. Additionally, we are required to recognize a deferred tax liability or asset for the estimated future tax effects attributable to temporary differences. Temporary differences occur when differences arise between: (a) the amount of taxable income and pretax financial income for a year and (b) the tax basis of assets or liabilities and their reported amounts in financial statements. SFAS 109 also requires that any deferred tax asset recognized must be reduced by a valuation allowance for any tax benefits that, in our judgment and based upon available evidence, may not be realizable.

 

As of April 30, 2007, we adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 requires that tax positions be assessed using a two-step process. A tax position is recognized if it meets a “more likely than not” threshold, and is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized. Uncertain tax positions must be reviewed at each balance sheet date. Liabilities recorded as a result of this analysis must generally be recorded separately from any current or deferred income tax accounts, and are classified as current Other accrued liabilities or long-term Other long-term liabilities based on the time until expected payment.

 

We recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. This policy did not change as a result of the adoption of FIN 48.

 

Slot Club Awards - We reward our slot customers for their loyalty based on the dollar amount of play on slot machines. We accrue for these slot club awards based on an estimate of the value of the outstanding awards utilizing the age and prior history of redemptions. Future events, such as a change in our marketing strategy or new competition, could result in a change in the value of the awards.

 

Stock Based Compensation - We apply the FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (SFAS 123(R)). The estimate of the fair value of the stock options is calculated using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model. This model requires the use of various assumptions, including the historical volatility, the risk free interest rate, estimated expected life of the grants, the estimated dividend yield and estimated rate of forfeitures. Total stock option expense is included in the expense category corresponding to the employees’ regular compensation in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

 

New Development Projects and Pre-opening costs - We pursue development opportunities for new gaming facilities in our ongoing efforts to grow and develop the Company.  Projects that have not yet been deemed as probable to reach completion because they have not yet met certain conditions, including receipt of sufficient regulatory approvals, site control or related permits and or probable financing are considered by us to be in the development stage.  In accordance with Statement of

 

35



 

Position 98-5 “Reporting on the Costs of Start-Up Activities” (“SOP 98-5”), costs related to projects in the development stage, except for those costs as detailed in SOP 98-5, are recorded as an expense of new development at the corporate level and recorded on the accompanying consolidated statement of operations in the operating expense line item “Corporate & development”.  Items for which a future value is probable, regardless of the project’s outcome, may be subject to capitalization and subsequent depreciation and amortization.

 

For approved projects, certain eligible costs related to such projects are capitalized. We follow the guidance of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 67 (“SFAS 67”) “Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects”, which are classified under the line item “Property and equipment, net” on the balance sheet.  Costs that are not capital in nature but either retain value or represent future liability, such as refundable utility deposits or a note payable, receive the appropriate balance sheet treatment.  All costs that are neither eligible for capitalization nor eligible for other balance sheet treatment, such as payroll, advertising, utilities and travel, are recorded as operating expenses when incurred.

 

Contingencies - We are involved in various legal proceedings and have identified certain loss contingencies. We record liabilities related to these contingencies when it is determined that a loss is probable and reasonably estimable in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies.”  These assessments are based on our knowledge and experience as well as the advice of legal counsel regarding current and past events.  Any such estimates are also subject to future events, court rulings, negotiations between the parties and other uncertainties. If an actual loss differs from our estimate, or the actual outcome of any of the legal proceedings differs from expectations, operating results could be impacted.

 

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

 

The following table provides information as of fiscal year 2008, about our contractual obligations and commercial commitments. The table presents contractual obligations by due dates and related contractual commitments by expiration dates (in millions).

 

 

 

Payments Due by Period

 

Contractual Obligations

 

Total

 

Less Than
1 Year

 

1-3 Years

 

4-5 Years

 

After 5 Years

 

Long-Term Debt

 

$

1,507.3

 

$

9.7

 

$

18.3

 

$

150.0

 

$

1,329.3

 

Estimated interest payments on long-term debt (1)

 

509.5

 

88.5

 

177.9

 

179.5

 

63.6

 

Operating Leases

 

673.0

 

21.7

 

32.6

 

31.0

 

587.7

 

Long-Term Obligations (2)

 

27.5

 

18.3

 

4.2

 

1.5

 

3.5

 

Other Long-Term Obligations (3)

 

17.3

 

2.4

 

2.8

 

2.5

 

9.6

 

Total Contractual Cash Obligations

 

2,734.6

 

140.6

 

235.8

 

364.5

 

1,993.7

 

 


(1)                  Estimated interest payment on long-term debt are based on principal amounts outstanding at our fiscal year end and forecasted LIBOR rates for our bank credit facility.

(2)                  Long-term obligations include future purchase commitments as well as current and future construction contracts.

(3)                  Other Long-Term Obligations include our contractual cash payments associated with assets accounted for under EITF 97-10.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

 

New Pronouncements - In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”) which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, the FASB having previously concluded in those accounting pronouncements that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, for financial assets and for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis, for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the impact the adoption of SFAS 157, including the deferment provisions of FSP 157-2, will have on the consolidated financial statements.

 

36



 

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”  (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits companies to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing companies with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. The fair value option established by SFAS 159 permits all companies to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election dates. At each subsequent reporting date, companies shall report in earnings any unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option have been elected. SFAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of a company’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007.

 

In December 2007, the FASB also issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests In Consolidated Financial Statements — An Amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51,” the provisions of which are effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2008. This statement requires an entity to classify noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries as a separate component of equity. Additionally, transactions between an entity and noncontrolling interests are required to be treated as equity transactions. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this statement on the financial statements.

 

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, including interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices and equity prices. Our primary exposure to market risk is interest rate risk associated with our senior secured credit facility (“July 2007 Credit Facility”).

 

Senior Secured Credit Facilities

 

During the fiscal year 2008,  we entered into six interest rate swap arrangements with an aggregate notional value of $450.0 million as of April 27, 2008.  The swap agreements effectively convert portions of the July 2007 Credit Facility variable debt to a fixed-rate basis until the respective swap agreements terminate, which occurs during fiscal years 2010, 2011, and 2012.  These swap agreements meet the criteria for hedge accounting for cash flow hedges and have been evaluated, as of fiscal year 2008, as being fully effective.

 

The following table provides information at April 27, 2008 about our financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. The table presents principal cash flows and related weighted average interest rates by expected maturity dates.

 

37



 

Interest Rate Sensitivity

Principal (Notional) Amount by Expected Maturity

Average Interest (Swap) Rate

 

Fiscal year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

(dollars in millions)

 

2009

 

2010

 

2011

 

2012

 

2013

 

Thereafter

 

Total

 

4/27/2008

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt, including current portion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed rate

 

$

0.3

 

$

0.2

 

$

0.2

 

$

0.2

 

$

0.2

 

$

503.3

 

$

504.4

 

$

381.9

 

Average interest rate

 

7.01

%

7.01

%

7.01

%

7.01

%

7.01

%

7.01

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Variable rate

 

$

9.4

 

$

8.9

 

$

8.9

 

$

8.9

 

$

140.7

 

$

826.1

 

$

1,002.9

 

$

889.9

 

Average interest rate (1)

 

5.02

%

5.10

%

5.80

%

6.29

%

6.50

%

6.62

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest Rate Derivative Financial Instruments Related to Debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pay fixed/receive variable (2)

 

$

 

$

100.0

 

$

300.0

 

$

50.0

 

$

 

$

 

$

450.0

 

$

13.7

 

Average pay rate

 

4.65

%

4.65

%

4.65

%

4.50

%

0.00

%

0.00

%

4.65

%

 

 

Average receive rate

 

3.16

%

3.31

%

3.87

%

4.40

%

0.00

%

0.00

%

3.35

%

 

 

 


(1)                   Represents the annual average LIBOR from the forward yield curve at April 27, 2008 plus the weighted average margin above LIBOR on all consolidated variable rate debt.

(2)                   Fair value represents the amount we would pay to the respective counter party if we had terminated the swap agreements on April 27, 2008.

 

We are also exposed to market risks relating to fluctuations in currency exchange rates related to our ownership interests and development activities in the UK.  We finance a portion of our UK investments in the local currency of the UK and due to the limited scope and nature of our UK operations, our market risks are immaterial.

 

For the fiscal year 2008, we recorded a loss of $0.4 million in foreign currency translation adjustments on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Foreign currency translation adjustments show the cumulative effect, at the balance sheet date, of fluctuations in the foreign currency exchange rate on balances denominated in a foreign currency, which were recorded at a historical rate at the transaction date.

 

38



 

ITEM 8.                               FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

The following consolidated financial statements are included in this report:

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Consolidated Financial Statements

 

 

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets — April 27, 2008 and April 29, 2007

 

 

 

Fiscal Years Ended April 27, 2008, April 29, 2007 and April 30, 2006

 

Consolidated Statements of Operations

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

 

 

Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts – Fiscal Years Ended April, 27, 2008, April 29, 2007 and April 30, 2006

 

 

39



 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc.

 

We have audited Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of April 27, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

In our opinion, Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of April 27, 2008, based on the COSO criteria .

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. as of April 27, 2008 and April 29, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the fiscal years ended April 27, 2008, April 29, 2007 and April 30, 2006, and our report dated July 10, 2008, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

 

 

 

/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Saint Louis, Missouri

 

July 10, 2008

 

 

40



 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc.

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. as of April 27, 2008 and April 29, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the fiscal years ended April 27, 2008, April 29, 2007, and April 30, 2006. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. at April 27, 2008 and April 29, 2007, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended April 27, 2008, April 29, 2007, and April 30, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

 

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, on April 30, 2007, the Company changed its method of accounting for uncertain tax positions. Additionally, as discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, on May 1, 2006, the Company changed its method of accounting for share-based payments.

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of April 27, 2008, based on the criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated July 10, 2008, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

 

 

 

/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Saint Louis, Missouri

 

July 10, 2008

 

 

41



 

ISLE OF CAPRI CASINOS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 

 

 

April 27,

 

April 29,

 

 

 

2008

 

2007

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

91,790

 

$

188,114

 

Marketable securities

 

18,533

 

17,169

 

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $4,258 and $4,335, respectively

 

12,195

 

22,527

 

Insurance receivable

 

7,689

 

56,040

 

Income taxes receivable

 

28,663

 

 

Deferred income taxes

 

12,606

 

12,421

 

Prepaid expenses and other assets

 

27,905

 

24,067

 

Total current assets

 

199,381

 

320,338

 

Property and equipment, net

 

1,328,986

 

1,338,570

 

Other assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill

 

307,649

 

297,268

 

Other intangible assets, net

 

89,252

 

74,154

 

Deferred financing costs, net

 

13,381

 

13,644

 

Restricted cash

 

4,802

 

4,637

 

Prepaid deposits and other

 

22,948

 

27,080

 

Deferred income taxes

 

7,767

 

 

Total assets

 

$

1,974,166

 

$

2,075,691

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Current maturities of long-term debt

 

$

9,698

 

$

7,594

 

Accounts payable

 

29,283

 

60,460

 

Accrued liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Payroll and related

 

47,618

 

48,402

 

Property and other taxes

 

30,137

 

23,380

 

Interest

 

8,580

 

10,166

 

Income taxes

 

 

16,011

 

Progressive jackpots and slot club awards

 

13,768

 

12,785

 

Other

 

44,353

 

56,943

 

Total current liabilities

 

183,437

 

235,741

 

Long-term debt, less current maturities

 

1,497,591

 

1,410,385

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

41,451

 

Other accrued liabilities

 

52,821

 

30,817

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

52,305

 

47,639

 

Minority interest

 

 

27,836

 

Stockholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized; none issued

 

 

 

Common stock, $.01 par value; 45,000,000 shares authorized; shares issued: 35,229,006 at April 27, 2008 and 34,682,534 at April 29, 2007

 

353

 

347

 

Class B common stock, $.01 par value; 3,000,000 shares authorized; none issued

 

 

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

188,036

 

175,132

 

Retained earnings

 

58,253

 

155,127

 

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income

 

(5,601

)

3,358

 

 

 

241,041

 

333,964

 

Treasury stock, 4,372,073 shares at April 27, 2008 and 4,323,555 shares at April 29, 2007

 

(53,029

)

(52,142

)

Total stockholders’ equity

 

188,012

 

281,822

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

1,974,166

 

$

2,075,691

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

42



 

ISLE OF CAPRI CASINOS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except share and  per share amounts)

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

 

 

April 27,

 

April 29,

 

April 30,

 

 

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Casino

 

$

1,121,860

 

$

1,015,629

 

$

1,004,143

 

Rooms

 

49,498

 

49,584

 

36,999

 

Food, beverage and other

 

136,481

 

130,635

 

125,857

 

Pari-mutuel commissions and fees

 

19,096

 

20,004

 

20,534

 

Gross revenues

 

1,326,935

 

1,215,852

 

1,187,533

 

Less promotional allowances

 

(201,583

)

(214,458

)

(200,174

)

Net revenues

 

1,125,352

 

1,001,394

 

987,359

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Casino

 

163,250

 

159,534

 

151,860

 

Gaming taxes

 

288,402

 

210,404

 

219,365

 

Rooms

 

12,031

 

9,811

 

8,463

 

Pari-mutuel commissions and fees

 

16,834

 

15,342

 

16,051

 

Food, beverage and other

 

45,538

 

32,262

 

31,530

 

Marine and facilities

 

68,044

 

60,174

 

56,993

 

Marketing and administrative

 

290,591

 

269,279

 

246,334

 

Corporate and development

 

48,974

 

57,217

 

57,803

 

Write-offs and other valuation charges

 

85,184

 

8,466

 

13,388

 

Preopening

 

6,457

 

13,573

 

281

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

136,127

 

99,506

 

88,819

 

Total operating expenses

 

1,161,432

 

935,568

 

890,887

 

Operating income (loss):

 

(36,080

)

65,826

 

96,472

 

Interest expense

 

(109,286

)

(89,150

)

(76,335

)

Interest income

 

3,814

 

7,469

 

2,694

 

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

 

(15,274

)

 

(2,110

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and minority interest

 

(156,826

)

(15,855

)

20,721

 

Income tax benefit (provision)

 

64,820

 

(1,906

)

(5,628

)

Minority interest

 

(4,868

)

(3,568

)

(6,462

)

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

(96,874

)

(21,329

)

8,631

 

Income from discontinued operations including gain on sale, net of income taxes of $-, $12,151 and $6,630 for the fiscal years ended 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively

 

 

16,692

 

10,244

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(96,874

)

$

(4,637

)

$

18,875

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings (loss) per common share basic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

$

(3.16

)

$

(0.70

)

$

0.29

 

Income from discontinued operations including gain on sale, net of income taxes

 

 

0.55

 

0.34

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(3.16

)

$

(0.15

)

$

0.63

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings (loss) per common share diluted:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

$

(3.16

)

$

(0.70

)

$

0.28

 

Income from discontinued operatons, net of income taxes

 

 

0.55

 

0.32

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(3.16

)

$

(0.15

)

$

0.60

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average basic shares

 

30,699,457

 

30,384,255

 

30,028,051

 

Weighted average diluted shares

 

30,699,457

 

30,384,255

 

31,270,486

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

43



 

ISLE OF CAPRI CASINOS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(In thousands, except share amounts)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accum.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Compre-

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

Shares of

 

 

 

Additional

 

Unearned

 

 

 

hensive

 

 

 

Stock-

 

 

 

Common

 

Common

 

Paid-in

 

Compen-

 

Retained

 

Income

 

Treasury

 

holders’

 

 

 

Stock

 

Stock

 

Capital

 

sation

 

Earnings

 

(Loss)

 

Stock

 

Equity

 

Balance, April 24, 2005

 

33,528,159

 

$

336

 

$

152,162

 

$

(1,488

)

$

140,889

 

$

2,782

 

$

(34,619

)

$

260,062

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

18,875

 

 

 

18,875

 

Reclassification of unrealized gain on interest rate swap contracts net of income taxes of $(68)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(105

)

 

(105

)

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2,546

)

 

(2,546

)

Comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16,224

 

Exercise of stock options, including income tax benefit of $2,119

 

765,104

 

7

 

11,019

 

 

 

 

957

 

11,983

 

Purchase of treasury stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8,494

)

(8,494

)

Grant of nonvested stock

 

 

 

367

 

(367

)

 

 

 

 

Amortization of unearned compensation

 

 

 

 

472

 

 

 

 

472

 

Balance, April 30, 2006

 

34,293,263

 

343

 

163,548

 

(1,383

)

159,764

 

131

 

(42,156

)

280,247

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

(4,637

)

 

 

(4,637

)

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,227

 

 

3,227

 

Comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,410

)

Exercise of stock options, including income tax benefit of $849

 

389,271

 

4

 

5,617

 

 

 

 

 

5,621

 

Issuance of deferred bonus shares from treasury stock

 

 

 

(429

)

 

 

 

429

 

 

Purchase of treasury stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10,415

)

(10,415

)

Deferred bonus expense

 

 

 

548

 

 

 

 

 

548

 

Stock compensation expense

 

 

 

7,231

 

 

 

 

 

7,231

 

Reclassification of unearned compensation due to the adoption of SFAS 123(R)

 

 

 

(1,383

)

1,383

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, April 29, 2007

 

34,682,534

 

$

347

 

$

175,132

 

$

 

$

155,127

 

$

3,358

 

$

(52,142

)

$

281,822

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

(96,874

)

 

 

(96,874

)

Unrealized loss on interest rate swap contracts net of income tax benefit of $5,159

 

 

 

 

 

 

(8,555

)

 

(8,555

)

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 

 

 

 

 

 

(404

)

 

(404

)

Comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(105,833

)

Exercise of stock options, including income tax benefit of $977

 

546,472

 

6

 

5,741

 

 

 

 

 

5,747

 

Issuance of deferred bonus shares from treasury stock

 

 

 

(414

)

 

 

 

414

 

 

Purchase of treasury stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,301

)

(1,301

)

Deferred bonus expense

 

 

 

265

 

 

 

 

 

265

 

Stock compensation expense

 

 

 

7,312

 

 

 

 

 

7,312

 

Balance, April 27, 2008

 

35,229,006

 

$

353

 

$

188,036

 

$

 

$

58,253

 

$

(5,601

)

$

(53,029

)

$

188,012

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

44



 

ISLE OF CAPRI CASINOS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

 

 

April 27,

 

April 29,

 

April 30,

 

 

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

Operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(96,874

)

$

(4,637

)

$

18,875

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

136,127

 

99,506

 

100,501

 

Amortization of deferred financing costs

 

2,700

 

2,636

 

2,979

 

Stock compensation expense

 

7,312

 

7,231

 

 

Amortization of unearned compensation

 

265

 

548

 

472

 

(Gain) loss on derivative instruments

 

550

 

1,045

 

(1,465

)

(Gain) loss on disposal of assets

 

(90

)

(26,244

)

668

 

Asset impairment charge

 

 

 

75,868

 

Valuation and other charges

 

85,184

 

8,466

 

13,388

 

Early extinguishment of debt

 

15,274

 

 

2,110

 

Deferred income taxes

 

(35,194

)

(12,374

)

420

 

Minority interest

 

4,868

 

3,568

 

6,462

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Purchases) sales of trading securities

 

(1,364

)

558

 

(1,222

)

Accounts receivable

 

10,276

 

(4,797

)

(5,794

)

Insurance receivable

 

48,393

 

1,359

 

(133,268

)

Income taxes

 

(32,562

)

6,940

 

12,292

 

Prepaid expenses and other assets

 

(1,098

)

(15,985

)

(9,468

)

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

(10,410

)

3,075

 

3,857

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

133,357

 

70,895

 

86,675

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchase of property and equipment

 

(190,459

)

(451,422

)

(224,391

)

Purchase of other intangible assets

 

(4,000

)

(4,013

)

(5,775

)

Net cash paid for acquisitions

 

(107,895

)

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from sales of assets held for sale

 

 

238,725

 

 

Insurance proceeds for hurricane damages

 

 

21,963

 

53,905

 

Restricted cash

 

65

 

(2,524

)

(175

)

Other

 

(157

)

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(302,446

)

(197,271

)

(176,436

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from long-term debt borrowings

 

875,000

 

 

240,000

 

Principal payments on long-term debt

 

(697,108

)

(7,089

)

(169,749

)

Net borrowings (repayments) on line of credit

 

(99,355

)

205,421

 

(4,916

)

Payment of deferred financing costs

 

(8,881

)

 

(1,797

)

Purchase of treasury stock

 

(1,301

)

(10,415

)

(8,494

)

Distribution to minority interests

 

(1,588

)

 

 

Proceeds from exercise of stock options including tax benefit

 

5,747

 

5,621

 

9,864

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

72,514

 

193,538

 

64,908

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effect of foreign currency exchange rates on cash

 

251

 

(97

)

(575

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

(96,324

)

67,065

 

(25,428

)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

 

188,114

 

121,049

 

146,477

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

 

$

91,790

 

$

188,114

 

$

121,049

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

45



 

ISLE OF CAPRI CASINOS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

 

1. Organization

 

Organization - Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc., a Delaware corporation, was incorporated in February 1990. Except where otherwise noted, the words “we,” “us,” “our” and similar terms, as well as “Company,” refer to Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. and all of its subsidiaries. We are a leading developer, owner and operator of branded gaming facilities and related lodging and entertainment facilities in markets throughout the United States and internationally. Our wholly owned subsidiaries own and operate thirteen casino gaming facilities in the United States located in Black Hawk, Colorado; Lake Charles, Louisiana; Lula, Biloxi and Natchez, Mississippi; Kansas City, Caruthersville and Boonville, Missouri; Bettendorf, Davenport, Waterloo and Marquette, Iowa; and Pompano Beach, Florida. Effective January 27, 2008, we own 100% of our operations in Black Hawk, Colorado following the acquisition of our minority partner’s 43% interest in those operations. Our international gaming interests include wholly owned casinos in Freeport, Grand Bahamas and Coventry, England and a two-thirds ownership interest in casinos in Dudley and Wolverhampton, England.

 

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Basis of Presentation – The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. We view each property as an operating segment and all such operating segments have been aggregated in to one reporting segment.

 

Discontinued operations relate to those of the Riverboat Corporation of Mississippi-Vicksburg in Vicksburg, Mississippi and Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Partnership in Bossier City, Louisiana, prior to July 31, 2006 when they were sold and are shown net of income tax effects in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“SFAS 144”).

 

Fiscal Year-End - Our fiscal year ends on the last Sunday in April. Periodically, this system necessitates a 53-week year.  Fiscal years 2008 and 2007 are both 52-week years, which commenced on April 30, 2007 and May 1, 2006, respectively. Fiscal 2006 was a 53-week year, which commenced on April 25, 2005.

 

Reclassifications Certain reclassifications of prior year presentations have been made to conform to the fiscal year 2008 presentation.

 

Use of Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents - We consider all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less as cash equivalents. Cash also includes the minimum operating cash balances required by state regulatory bodies, which totaled $23,982 and $25,246 at April 27, 2008 and April 29, 2007, respectively.

 

Marketable Securities - Marketable securities consist of trading securities primarily held by Capri Insurance Corporation, our captive insurance subsidiary. The trading securities are primarily debt and equity securities that are purchased with the intention to resell in the near term. The trading securities are carried at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in current period income in the accompanying statements of operations.

 

Inventories - Inventories are stated at the lower of cost  or market.  Cost is determined by the lower of cost (weighted average) or market value.

 

Property and Equipment - Property and equipment are stated at cost or if acquired through acquisition, its value as determined under purchase accounting. Assets subject to impairment write downs are recorded at the lower of net book value or fair value. We capitalize the cost of purchases of property and equipment and capitalize the cost of improvements to property and equipment that increases the value or extends the useful lives of the assets. Costs of normal repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred.

 

46



 

Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives of the assets:

 

 

 

Years

Slot machines, software and computers

 

3-5

Furniture, fixtures and equipment

 

5-10

Leasehold improvements

 

Lesser of life of lease or estimated useful life

Buildings and improvements

 

7-39.5

 

Certain leased properties, in Coventry, England and Bettendorf, Iowa are accounted for in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force 97-10, “The Effect of Lessee Involvement in Asset Construction” (“EITF 97-10”).

 

Capitalized Interest - The interest cost associated with major development and construction projects is capitalized and included in the cost of the project. When no debt is incurred specifically for a project, interest is capitalized on amounts expended on the project using the weighted-average cost of our outstanding borrowings. Capitalization of interest ceases when the project is substantially complete or development activity is suspended for more than a brief period. Capitalized interest was $3,335, $9,528 and $4,589 for fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

 

Operating Leases - We recognize rent expense for each lease on the straight line basis, aggregating all future minimum rent payments including any predetermined fixed escalations of the minimum rentals. Our liabilities include the aggregate difference between rent expense recorded on the straight-line basis and amounts paid under the leases.

 

Restricted Cash – We classify cash that is either statutorily or contractually restricted as to its withdrawal or usage as a long term asset due to the duration of the underlying restriction. Restricted cash primarily includes amounts related to state tax bonds and other gaming bonds, amounts held in escrow related to leases and other deposits related to new development activities or acquisitions.

 

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets - Goodwill represents the excess of the cost over the net identifiable tangible and intangible assets of acquired businesses and is stated at cost, net of impairments, if any. Other intangible assets include values attributable to acquired gaming licenses, customer lists, and trademarks. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets , (“SFAS 142”) requires these assets be reviewed for impairment at least annually. For intangible assets with indefinite lives not subject to amortization, we review, at least annually, the continued use of an indefinite useful life. If these intangible assets are determined to have a finite useful life, they are amortized over their estimated remaining useful lives.

 

Long-Lived Assets - We periodically evaluate the carrying value of long-lived assets to be held and used in accordance with SFAS 144 which requires impairment losses to be recorded on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets’ carrying amounts. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair market value of the long-lived assets.

 

Deferred Financing Costs - The costs of issuing long-term debt are capitalized and amortized using the effective interest method over the term of the related debt.

 

Self-Insurance – We are self-funded up to a maximum amount per claim for employee-related health care benefits, workers’ compensation insurance and general liability insurance. Claims in excess of this maximum are fully insured through a stop-loss insurance policy. We accrue for workers’ compensation and general liability insurance on a discounted basis based on claims filed and estimates of claims incurred but not reported. The estimates have been discounted at 5.3% and 6.0% at April 27, 2008 and April 29, 2007, respectively. We utilize independent consultants to assist in the determination of estimated accruals. As of April 27, 2008 and April 29, 2007, our employee-related health care benefits program and discounted workers’ compensation and general liabilities for unpaid and incurred but not reported claims are $27,031 and $28,937, respectively and are included in Accrued liabilities-payroll and related for health care benefits and workers’ compensation insurance and in Accrued liabilities-other for general liability insurance in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. While the total cost of claims incurred depends on future developments, in management’s opinion, recorded reserves are adequate to cover future claims payments.

 

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities - SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS 133”) requires we recognize all of our derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities in the

 

47



 

consolidated balance sheet at fair value. We utilize derivative financial instruments to manage interest rate risk associated with some of our variable rate borrowings. Derivative financial instruments are intended to reduce our exposure to interest rate risk. We account for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depending on the intended use of the derivative and the resulting designation, which is established at the inception of a derivative. SFAS 133 requires that a company formally document, at the inception of a hedge, the hedging relationship and the entity’s risk management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge, including identification of the hedging instrument, the hedged item or transaction, the nature of the risk being hedged, the method used to assess effectiveness and the method that will be used to measure hedge ineffectiveness of derivative instruments that receive hedge accounting treatment. For derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, changes in fair value, to the extent the hedge is effective, are recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. Hedge effectiveness is assessed quarterly based on the total change in the derivative’s fair value.

 

Revenue Recognition - In accordance with gaming industry practice, we recognize casino revenues as the net win from gaming activities. Casino revenues are net of accruals for anticipated payouts of progressive slot jackpots and certain table games wherein incremental jackpot amounts owed are accrued for games in which every coin played or wagered adds to the jackpot total. Revenues from rooms, food, beverage, entertainment and the gift shop are recognized at the time the related service or sale is performed or made.

 

Net Revenues - The retail value of rooms, food and beverage and other services furnished to guests without charge is included in gross revenues and then deducted as promotional allowances to arrive at net revenues included in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. We also record the redemption of coupons and points for cash as a promotional allowance. The estimated cost of providing such complimentary services are included in casino expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations are as follows:

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

 

 

April 27,

 

April 29,

 

April 30,

 

 

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rooms

 

$

10,080

 

$

12,980

 

$

9,647

 

Food and beverage

 

64,145

 

66,098

 

58,793

 

Other

 

152

 

223

 

250

 

Total cost of complimentary services

 

$

74,377

 

$

79,301

 

$

68,690

 

 

Slot Club Awards - We provide slot patrons with rewards based on the dollar amount of play on slot machines. A liability has been established based on an estimate of the value of these outstanding rewards, utilizing the age and prior history of redemptions.

 

Advertising - Advertising costs are expensed the first time the related advertisement appears. Total advertising costs were $25,217, $22,640 and $21,392 in fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

 

Development Costs - We pursue development opportunities for new gaming facilities in an ongoing effort to expand our business. In accordance with Statement of Position 98-5 “Reporting on the Costs of Start-Up Activities” (“SOP 98-5”), costs related to projects in the development stage, except for those costs as detailed in SOP 98-5, are recorded as a development expense. Additionally, following the guidance of SFAS No. 67, Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects, development costs are expensed when the development is deemed less than probable. Total development costs expensed were $5,539, $16,262 and $20,370, in fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and were recorded in the consolidated statements of operations in corporate and development expenses.

 

Pre-Opening Costs - We account for costs incurred during the pre-opening phase of operations in accordance with Statement of Position 98-5, Reporting on the Costs of Start-Up Activities, and expense pre-opening costs as incurred. Pre-opening costs include payroll, outside services, advertising, insurance, utilities, travel and various other expenses related to new operations. All such costs are recorded in the consolidated statements of operations in pre-opening. Pre-opening expenses in our consolidated financial statements were incurred in connection with the opening of the Pompano Park racino in April 2007, Isle-Waterloo in June 2007 and Isle-Coventry in July 2007.

 

Income Taxes – We account for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS 109”). SFAS 109 requires the recognition of deferred income tax assets, net of applicable reserves related to net operating loss carry forwards and certain temporary differences. Recognizable future tax benefits are subject to a valuation reserve, unless such tax benefits are determined to be more likely than not. On April 30, 2007, we adopted the additional

 

48



 

provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”). We recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.

 

Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share - In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share” (“SFAS 128”), basic earnings (loss) per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income (loss) applicable to common stock by the weighted average common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS reflects the additional dilution for all potentially dilutive securities such as stock options. Any options with an exercise price in excess of the average market price of the our common stock during the periods presented are not considered when calculating the dilutive effect of stock options for diluted earnings per share calculations.

 

Stock-Based Compensation – Our stock-based compensation is accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Shared-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”).  On May 1, 2006, we elected the modified prospective method, in which compensation cost is recognized beginning with the effective date (a) based on the requirements of SFAS 123(R) for all share-based payments granted or modified after the effective date and (b) based on the requirements of SFAS 123 for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date of SFAS 123(R) that remain unvested on the effective date.

 

Foreign Currency Translation - We account for currency translation in accordance with SFAS No. 52, “Foreign Currency Translation” (“SFAS 52”). Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate in effect at each balance sheet date. Statement of operations accounts are translated monthly at the average rate of exchange prevailing during the period. Translation adjustments resulting from this process are included in stockholders’ equity as accumulated other comprehensive income. The cumulative gain from foreign currency translation included in other comprehensive loss is $2,977 and $3,381 as of April 27, 2008 and April 29, 2007, respectively. Gains and losses from foreign currency transactions are included in marketing and administrative expense. A loss of $356 was recorded in fiscal year 2008 and gains of $1,846 and $1,051 were recorded in fiscal years 2007 and 2006, respectively.

 

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts – We reserve for receivables that may not be collected.  Methodologies for estimating the allowance for doubtful accounts range from specific reserves to various percentages applied to aged receivables.  Historical collection rates are considered, as are customer relationships, in determining specific reserves.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Standards - New Pronouncements - In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”) which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, the FASB having previously concluded in those accounting pronouncements that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. On February 12, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157 (“FSP 157-2”), delaying the effective date of FASB 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. We are currently evaluating the impact the adoption of SFAS 157, including the deferment provisions of FSP 157-2, will have on the consolidated financial statements.

 

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits companies to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing companies with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. The fair value option established by SFAS 159 permits all companies to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election dates. At each subsequent reporting date, companies shall report in earnings any unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option have been elected. SFAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of a company’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. We are currently evaluating the fair value option under SFAS 159 and evaluating what impact such adoption would have on the consolidated financial statements.

 

In December 2007, the FASB also issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests In Consolidated Financial Statements — An Amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51,” the provisions of which are effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2008. This statement requires an entity to classify noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries as a separate component of equity. Additionally, transactions between an entity and noncontrolling interests are required to be treated as equity transactions. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this statement on the consolidated financial statements.

 

49



 

3. Property and Equipment, Net

 

Property and equipment, net consists of the following:

 

 

 

April 27,

 

April 29,

 

 

 

2008

 

2007

 

Property and equipment:

 

 

 

 

 

Land and land improvements

 

$

151,747

 

$

141,222

 

Leasehold improvements

 

323,155

 

320,250

 

Buildings and improvements

 

719,175

 

530,358

 

Riverboats and floating pavilions

 

142,444

 

127,812

 

Furniture, fixtures and equipment

 

517,591

 

452,859

 

Construction in progress

 

35,438

 

223,351

 

Total property and equipment

 

1,889,550

 

1,795,852

 

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

(560,564

)

(457,282

)

Property and equipment, net

 

$

1,328,986

 

$

1,338,570

 

 

4. Acquisitions

 

Acquisition of Minority Interest in Black Hawk, Colorado Operations – Effective January 27, 2008, we purchased the 43% minority membership interest in our Black Hawk, Colorado subsidiaries for a purchase price of $64,800, including transaction costs. Following the acquisition, we own 100% of our Black Hawk, Colorado operations.  The purchase price for these membership interests was determined based upon estimates of future cash flows and evaluations of the net assets acquired. We funded the purchase through cash and borrowings under our Senior Credit Facility.  We accounted for the purchase using the purchase method of accounting in accordance with SFAS No. 141 “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141”). Third party valuations for the property and equipment, and intangible assets are still in process. After consideration of the minority interest liability of $29,819, the preliminary purchase price allocation included $14,000 in property and equipment, $10,600 in other intangible assets and $10,381 in goodwill.

 

Acquisition of Caruthersville - On June 10, 2007, we acquired 100% of the membership interests of Atzar Missouri Riverboat Gaming Company, L.L.C., a Missouri limited liability company located in Caruthersville, Missouri.  The purchase price, including transaction costs, was approximately $46,241, including $2,940 of cash acquired. The purchase price for these membership interests was determined based upon estimates of future cash flows and evaluations of the net assets acquired. During January 2008, we finalized certain post closing date adjustments with the seller. The purchase was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting in accordance with SFAS 141. Third party valuations were obtained for the property and equipment, and other intangible assets.  The purchase price included $959 in net working capital, $39,861 in property and equipment, and $5,421 in other intangible assets.

 

50



 

5. Intangible Assets and Goodwill

 

Intangible assets consist of the following:

 

 

 

April 27, 2008

 

April 29, 2007

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

 

Net

 

Gross

 

 

 

Net

 

 

 

Carrying

 

Accumulated

 

Carrying

 

Carrying

 

Accumulated

 

Carrying

 

 

 

Amount

 

Amortization

 

Amount

 

Amount

 

Amortization

 

Amount

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Indefinite-lived assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gaming licenses

 

$

73,891

 

$

 

$

73,891

 

$

61,953

 

$

 

$

61,953

 

Trademarks

 

12,500

 

 

12,500

 

12,201

 

 

12,201

 

Intangible assets - subject to amortization

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trademarks

 

102

 

(93

)

9

 

 

 

 

Customer lists

 

3,307

 

(455

)

2,852

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

89,800

 

$

(548

)

$

89,252

 

$

74,154

 

$

 

$

74,154

 

 

Our indefinite-lived intangible assets consist primarily of gaming licenses and trademarks for which it is reasonably assured that we will continue to renew indefinitely. Our finite-lived assets consist primarily of customer lists amortized over 3 years and trademarks which have a contractual term or it has been decided not to renew, amortized over their remaining legal or contractual life.  The weighted average remaining life of our other intangible assets subject to amortization is approximately 2.5 years.

 

Future amortization expense of our amortizable intangible assets is as follows:

 

2009

 

$

1,111

 

2010

 

1,102

 

2011

 

648

 

Total

 

$

2,861

 

 

A rollforward of goodwill is as follows:

 

 

 

April 27, 2008

 

April 29, 2007

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

$

297,268

 

$

305,365

 

Acquisition of minority interest in Black Hawk, Colorado operations

 

10,381

 

 

Impairment Isle-Lula

 

 

(7,801

)

Other, net

 

 

(296

)

Balance, end of period

 

$

307,649

 

$

297,268

 

 

6. Valuation and Other Charges

 

As a result of continuing losses, a review of expected future operating trends and the current fair values of our long-lived assets in Coventry, England, we have recorded an impairment charge of $77,978 related to long-lived assets of our Coventry operations as of April 27, 2008.  The current fair values used in our determination of the impairment charge were based upon a third party appraisal, a review of historical costs and other relevant information.  The balance of long-lived assets as of April 27, 2008, following the recording of the impairment charge is $55,830.  This includes $5,012 of owned assets used in the operation of our Coventry casino and $50,818 of assets representing the Coventry Convention Center which we are deemed to own under EITF 97-10. Future operating results of and decisions regarding our Coventry casino could result in additional impairment charges associated with these assets.  During the fiscal year 2008, we also recorded valuation and other charges of $7,206 related to the termination of the Company’s plans to develop a new casino in west Harrison County, Mississippi and the cancellation of construction projects in Davenport, Iowa and Kansas City, Missouri and a valuation charge to write-down the carrying value of the Blue Chip casino in Walsall, England.

 

During fiscal year 2007, we recorded valuation and other charges of $8,466 in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The amount primarily relates to the $7,801 goodwill impairment charge at Lula that resulted from our annual valuation review required by FAS 142. Also included in this amount was approximately $665 related to the write-down of the long-lived assets due to the closure of one of the Blue Chip casinos in Walsall, England.

 

51



 

During fiscal year 2006, we recorded valuation and other charges of $13,388 in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. These charges related to a $9,192 impairment charge against goodwill and other intangible assets and a $554 charge on fixed asset at our Blue Chip properties due to the economic performance of Blue Chip. We also recorded a $3,642 charge related to our then planned exit of Our Lucaya including $2,415 in fixed asset impairments and $1,227 in expected severance payments. During fiscal year 2007, following a new agreement with the Government of the Bahamian, we decided to continue the operations in Our Lucaya and reversed $1,170 of the severance accrual.

 

7.               Long-Term Debt

 

Long-term debt consists of the following:

 

 

 

April 27,

 

April 29,

 

 

 

2008

 

2007

 

Senior Secured Credit Facilities:

 

 

 

 

 

July 2007 Credit Facility:

 

 

 

 

 

Revolving line of credit, expires July 26, 2012, interest payable at least quarterly at either LIBOR and/or prime plus a margin

 

$

130,500

 

$

 

Variable rate term loans, mature November 25, 2013, principal and interest payments due quarterly at either LIBOR and/or prime plus a margin

 

869,313

 

 

February 2005 Credit Facility:

 

 

 

 

 

Revolving line of credit

 

 

210,000

 

Variable rate term loans

 

 

293,500

 

Senior Subordinated Notes:

 

 

 

 

 

7% Senior Subordinated Notes, interest payable semi-annually March 1 and September 1

 

500,000

 

500,000

 

9% Senior Subordinated Notes, extinguished August 2007

 

 

200,000

 

Senior Secured Credit Facilities of Subsidiaries - non-recourse to Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

Isle-Black Hawk Credit Facility:

 

 

 

 

 

Revolving line of credit

 

 

16,400

 

Variable rate term loan

 

 

187,150

 

Blue Chip Credit Facility

 

1,262

 

6,157

 

Other

 

6,214

 

4,772

 

 

 

1,507,289

 

1,417,979

 

Less current maturities

 

9,698

 

7,594

 

Long-term debt

 

$

1,497,591

 

$

1,410,385

 

 

July 2007 Credit Facility - On July 26, 2007, we entered into a $1,350,000 senior secured credit facility (“July 2007 Credit Facility”), replacing the February 2005 Credit Facility. The July 2007 Credit Facility is secured on a first priority basis by substantially all of our assets and by all of our significant domestic subsidiaries.

 

The July 2007 Credit Facility consists of a $475,000, five-year revolving line of credit and an $875,000 term loan facility. The $875,000 term loan facility consists of a $500,000 senior secured loan facility which was drawn at closing In January 2008, we used proceeds from our term loan facility to fully repay and retire the Isle-Black Hawk Senior Secured Credit Facility. Simultaneously, we designated our Black Hawk subsidiaries as “restricted subsidiaries” under the July 2007 Credit Facility. Our net line of credit availability at April 27, 2008 is approximately $170,000, after consideration of approximately $18,600 in outstanding letters of credit. We have an annual commitment fee related to the unused credit facility of up to 0.5% which is included in interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

 

The weighted average effective interest rate of the February 2005 and July 2007 Credit Facilities for fiscal years 2008 and 2007 were 6.55% and 7.73%, respectively.

 

The July 2007 Credit Facility includes a number of affirmative and negative covenants. Additionally, we must comply with certain financial covenants including maintenance of a leverage ratio and minimum interest coverage ratio.  The July 2007 Credit Facility also restricts our ability to make certain investments or distributions.  We are in compliance with the covenants as of April 27, 2008.

 

February 2005 Credit Facility – Prior to entering into the July 2007 Credit Facility, we were party to the February 2005 Credit Facility (“February 2005 Credit Facility”), which consisted of a $400,000 revolving line of credit facility maturing in February 2010 and a $300,000 term loan facility maturing in February 2011.

 

52



 

7% Senior Subordinated Notes - During 2004, we issued $500,000 of 7% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014 (“7% Senior Subordinated Notes”). The 7% Senior Subordinated Notes are guaranteed, on a joint and several basis, by all of our significant domestic subsidiaries and other subsidiaries as described more fully in Note 18. All of the guarantor subsidiaries are wholly owned by us. The 7% Senior Subordinated Notes are general unsecured obligations and rank junior to all existing and future senior indebtedness, and equally with all existing and future senior subordinated debt, and senior to any future subordinated indebtedness. The 7% Senior Subordinated Notes are redeemable, in whole or in part, at our option at any time on or after March 1, 2009, at the redemption prices (expressed as percentages of principal amount) set forth below plus accrued and unpaid interest to the applicable redemption date, if redeemed during the 12-month period beginning on March 1 st of the years indicated below:

 

Year

 

Percentage

 

2009

 

103.500

%

2010

 

102.333

%

2011

 

101.167

%

2012 and thereafter

 

100.000

%

 

The indenture, governing the 7% Senior Subordinated Notes limits, among other things, our ability and our restricted subsidiaries ability to borrow money, make restricted payments, use assets as security in other transactions, enter into transactions with affiliates or pay dividends on or repurchase stock. The indenture also limits our ability to issue and sell capital stock of subsidiaries, sell assets in excess of specified amounts or merge with or into other companies.

 

9% Senior Subordinated Notes - During 2002, we issued $200,000 of 9% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2012 (“9% Senior Subordinated Notes”). These 9% Senior Subordinated Notes were called for redemption at 104.5% and redeemed during August 2007.

 

Isle-Black Hawk Senior Secured Credit Facility - During 2005, Isle of Capri Black Hawk, L.L.C. entered into a $240,000 Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and amended such agreement during January 2007 (the “Isle-Black Hawk Credit Facility”). The credit agreement, as amended, provided for a $50,000 revolving credit facility and a $190,000 term loan facility. The credit agreement was secured by liens on substantially all of Isle of Capri Black Hawk, L.L.C.’s assets. As of January 28, 2008, we repaid and cancelled the Isle-Black Hawk Credit Facility with borrowings under our July 2007 Credit Facility.

 

The weighted-average effective interest rate of total debt outstanding under the Isle-Black Hawk Credit Facility for the fiscal years 2008 and 2007 was 6.99% and 6.79%, respectively.

 

Blue Chip Credit Facility - Blue Chip Casinos Ltd. (“Blue Chip”) entered into an agreement effective November 28, 2003, as amended on May 24, 2004, with the Bank of Scotland to borrow up to £3,500 (the “Blue Chip Credit Facility”) to fund its casino development program. The Blue Chip Credit Facility is secured on a first priority basis by substantially all of Blue Chip’s assets. As of April 27, 2008, we had repaid all outstanding balances under the term loan facility and had £636 ($1,262) outstanding balance under the £800 revolving loan facility. The interest rate at Blue Chip’s option is (1) the Bank of Scotland’s base rate plus a current margin of 2.0% or (2) LIBOR plus a margin of 1.75%.  For fiscal years 2008 and 2007, the weighted-average effective interest rate was 8.75% and 7.25%, respectively. The Blue Chip Credit Facility is non-recourse to the Company.

 

Blue Chip was in default of certain debt covenants as of and subsequent to April 27, 2008, which have been cured by Blue Chip or compliance waived by the bank. As of April 27, 2008, Blue Chip had no letters of credit outstanding under the Blue Chip Credit Facility, and net availability under the Blue Chip Credit Facility was £164 ($325).

 

Losses on Early Extinguishment of Debt - In conjunction with the replacement of the February 2005 Credit Facility with the July 2007 Credit Facility, $2,192 of unamortized debt issuance costs were recorded as a loss on early extinguishment of debt for fiscal year 2008, while the remaining deferred debt issuance costs will be amortized over the respective lives of the new revolver and term credit facilities of the July 2007 Credit Facility. Losses on Early Extinguishment of Debt for the fiscal year 2008 totaled $15,274 and included the $2,192 from the credit facility refinancing, the $9,000 call premium and write-off of $2,468 in unamortized deferred financing costs associated with the call of our 9% Senior Subordinated Notes and $1,614 of unamortized deferred financing costs associated with the early repayment of our Black Hawk Credit Facility.  We followed EITF 96-19 “Debtor’s Accounting for a Modification of Exchange of Debt Instruments” and EITF 98-14 “Debtor’s Accounting for changes in Line-of-Credit or Revolving Debt Arrangements” in accounting for this refinancing transaction and its associated deferred debt issuance costs.

 

53



 

Interest Rate Swap Agreements - We have entered into various interest rate swap agreements pertaining to the July 2007 Credit Facility for an aggregate notional value of $450,000 with maturity dates ranging from fiscal year 2010 to 2012 in order to manage market risk on variable rate term loans outstanding, as well as comply with, in part, requirements under the July 2007 Credit Facility.

 

These swap agreements meet the criteria for hedge accounting for cash flow hedges and have been evaluated, as of fiscal year 2008, as being fully effective.  As a result, there is no impact on our consolidated statement of operations from changes in fair value.  As of April 27, 2008, we recorded a liability of $13,714 in Other long-term liabilities representing the fair market value of the swap agreements and an unrealized loss of $8,555, net of a $5,159 deferred income tax benefit, in Accumulated other comprehensive loss on the consolidated balance sheet. As of fiscal year 2008, the weighted average fixed LIBOR interest rate of our interest rate swap agreements was 4.65%.

 

The fair value of the estimated interest differential between the applicable future variable rates and the interest rate swap contracts not designated as hedging instruments, expressed in present value terms, totaled $0 and $528 as of fiscal year 2008 and fiscal year 2007, respectively. Based on the maturity dates of the contracts, these amounts are included in prepaid expenses and other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

 

The aggregate principal payments due on long-term debt as of April 27, 2008 over the next five years and thereafter, are as follows:

 

Fiscal Years Ending:

 

 

 

2009

 

$

9,698

 

2010

 

9,159

 

2011

 

9,104

 

2012

 

9,123

 

2013

 

140,905

 

Thereafter

 

$

1,329,300

 

Total

 

$

1,507,289

 

 

8. Other Long-Term Obligations

 

Coventry Convention Center - We entered into an agreement during fiscal year 2004 to lease space for a new casino, which opened in July 2007, in Coventry, England in the sub-level of the Arena Coventry Convention Center. The convention center was developed, and is owned and operated by a non-affiliated entity and began operations in August 2005. Because certain structural elements were installed by us during the construction of the space being leased and certain prepaid lease payments we made, we are required to be treated, for accounting purposes only, as the “owner” of the Arena Coventry Convention Center, in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 97-10 (“EITF 97-10”), “The Effect of Lessee Involvement in Asset Construction”. Accordingly, we have recorded a long-term obligation for £24,230 ($48,058) and £23,837 ($47,639) as of April 27, 2008 and April 29, 2007, respectively, even though we do not; (1) own this asset, (2) we are not the obligor on the corresponding long-term obligation and (3) do not participate in or control the operations of the convention center.  Upon completion of the convention center we were precluded from accounting for the transaction as a sale and leaseback under SFAS No. 98 “Accounting for Leases” due to our continuing involvement as a tenant, as a result of our lease prepayments during the construction period of the convention center.  Therefore, we are accounting for the transaction using the direct financing method in accordance with SFAS No. 66 “Accounting for the Sales of Real Estate”.

 

The other long-term obligation will be reflected in our consolidated balance sheets until completion of the lease term, when the related fixed assets will be removed from our financial statements. At such time, the net of the remaining obligation over the carrying value of the fixed asset will be recognized as a gain on sale of the facility.

 

The following table represents future minimum payments, which will be recognized as interest expense, due under the long-term obligation as of April 27, 2008 in values of both British Pounds and U.S. Dollars using the April 27, 2008 exchange rate of 1.9833 US Dollars to British Pounds.

 

54



 

Fiscal Years Ending:

 

 

 

 

 

2009

 

£

 623

 

$

1,236

 

2010

 

623

 

1,236

 

2011

 

623

 

1,236

 

2012

 

623

 

1,236

 

2013

 

623

 

1,236

 

Thereafter

 

4,827

 

9,573

 

Total minimum lease payments

 

£

 7,942

 

$

15,753

 

 

Bettendorf Events Center – We have entered into agreements with the City of Bettendorf, Iowa under which the City has agreed to construct an events center adjacent to our new hotel. We will lease, manage, and provide financial and operating support for the events center. The Company has determined the events center is a transaction under EITF 97-10. As such, the Company is deemed to be the owner of the events center during the construction period and at April 27, 2008, has recorded construction in process of $5,428 and an other long-term obligation of $4,247. Total construction costs of the event center are estimated at approximately $20,000.

 

9. Common Stock

 

Earnings per Share of Common Stock - The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share (in thousands, except share and per share amounts):

 

 

 

April 27,

 

April 29,

 

April 30,

 

 

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

Numerator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) applicable to common shares:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

$

(96,874

)

$

(21,329

)

$

8,631

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

 

16,692

 

10,244

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(96,874

)

$

(4,637

)

$

18,875

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Denominator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Denominator for basic earnings (loss) per share - weighted average shares

 

30,699,457

 

30,384,255

 

30,028,051

 

Effect of dilutive securities Employee stock options and nonvested restricted stock

 

 

 

1,242,435

 

Denominator for diluted earnings (loss) per share - adjusted weighted average shares and assumed conversions

 

30,699,457

 

30,384,255

 

31,270,486

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings (loss) per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

$

(3.16

)

$

(0.70

)

$

0.29

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

 

0.55

 

0.34

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(3.16

)

$

(0.15

)

$

0.63

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings (loss) per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

$

(3.16

)

$

(0.70

)

$

0.28

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

 

0.55

 

0.32

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(3.16

)

$

(0.15

)

$

0.60

 

 

Potentially dilutive common stock options excluded from the computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share which were anti-dilutive due to our loss from continuing operations were 3,872,513, and 3,057,054 for fiscal years 2008 and 2007, respectively.  Potentially dilutive common stock options excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share due to anti-dilution were 335,106 for fiscal year 2006.

 

Stock Based Compensation Stock Options – We have two stock-based compensation plans, the 1993 Stock Option Plan and the 2000 Stock Option Plan as amended, which have a maximum of 4,650,000 and 3,500,000 options, respectively, which we reserved for issuance and may be granted to directors, officers and employees.  The plans provide for the issuance of incentive stock options and nonqualified options which have a maximum term of 10 years and are, generally, exercisable in yearly installments of 20% commencing one year after the date of grant.  We have 350,043 shares available for future issuance under its equity compensation plans as of April 27, 2008.

 

55



 

Effective May 1, 2006, we have adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective method, thus, results for the periods prior to May 1, 2006 have not been restated in relation to the application of SFAS 123(R). We recognized $7,312 and $7,231 for stock option expense for fiscal years 2008 and 2007, respectively. The income tax benefit recognized for nonqualified stock option expense was approximately $1,861 and $1,584 for fiscal years 2008 and 2007, respectively. We also recognized an excess tax benefit on the exercise of stock options of $977 and $849 in fiscal years 2008 and 2007, respectively which decreased our federal taxes payable.

 

As of April 27, 2008, there was $10,151 in unrecognized stock compensation costs, related to unvested options, which we expect we will recognize over the remaining vesting periods with a weighted average remaining vesting period of 3.9 years. Stock options granted generally are exercisable in yearly installments of 20%, commencing one year after the date of grant. We recognize compensation expense for these grants on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award as if the award was, in-substance, multiple awards.

 

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model with the range of assumptions disclosed in the following table for the periods presented. Weighted average volatility is calculated using the historical volatility of our stock prices over a range of dates equal to the expected term of a grant’s options. The weighted average expected term is calculated using historical data that is representative of the option for which the fair value is to be determined. The expected term represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The weighted average risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant for the approximate period of time equivalent to the grant’s expected term.

 

 

 

April 27, 2008

 

April 29, 2007

 

April 30, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average volatility

 

43.02

%

52.28

%

55.03

%

Expected dividends

 

None

 

None

 

None

 

Weighted average expected term (in years)

 

6.79

 

5.89

 

6.36

 

Weighted average risk-free rate

 

3.94

%

4.69

%

4.32

%

 

A summary of option activity for the fiscal year 2008 is presented below:

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

Average

 

Aggregate

 

 

 

 

 

Exercise

 

Remaining

 

Intrinsic

 

 

 

Options

 

Price

 

Life

 

Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding options at April 30, 2007

 

2,957,073

 

$

17.96

 

 

 

 

 

Options granted

 

1,762,800

 

16.40

 

 

 

 

 

Options exercised

 

(546,472

)

9.16

 

 

 

 

 

Options forfeited and expired

 

(341,055

)

21.86

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding options at April 27, 2008

 

3,832,346

 

$

18.15

 

7.5

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding exercisable options at April 27, 2008

 

1,364,876

 

$

17.68

 

5.0

 

$

 

 

The total intrinsic value of options exercised during fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $5,423, $4,992 and $6,908, respectively. Upon the exercise of options, we issued new shares to the optionee which increases the total number of common shares outstanding. The weighted average fair value of options granted during the fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $7.72, $13.67 and $13.09 per share, respectively.

 

Prior to May 1, 2006, we applied the recognition and measurement principles of APB 25 and related Interpretations in accounting for the Company’s three stock-based employee compensation plans. No stock-based employee compensation expense is reflected in net income as all options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share as if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 as amended by SFAS 148, to stock-based employee compensation.

 

56



 

 

 

April 30, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

18,875

 

Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects

 

(3,804

)

Pro forma income before discontinued operations

 

$

15,071

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per share: Basic

 

 

 

As Reported

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

0.63

 

Earnings per share: Basic

 

 

 

Pro Forma

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

0.50

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per share: Diluted

 

 

 

As Reported

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

0.60

 

Earnings per share: Diluted

 

 

 

Pro Forma

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

0.48

 

 

  Stock-Based Compensation—Deferred Bonus Plan - In fiscal 2001, our stockholders approved the Deferred Bonus Plan. The Deferred Bonus Plan provides for the issuance of non-vested stock to eligible officers and employees who agree to receive a deferred bonus in the form of non-vested stock. The vesting of the stock is dependent upon continued service to the Company for a period of five years and the fair value of the non-vested stock is amortized ratably over the vesting period. At April 27, 2008, the non-vested stock outstanding in connection with the Deferred Bonus Plan totaled 40,167 shares, none of which were granted during fiscal year ended April 27, 2008. Compensation expense related to stock-based compensation under the Deferred Bonus Plan for fiscal years 2008, 2007, and 2006 totaled $265, $548, and $367, respectively. We do not plan to award any further compensation under the Deferred Bonus Plan, however, any grants that have been awarded prior to the Deferred Bonus Plan’s discontinuation will be paid provided the vesting requirements are met.

 

The following table presents the number and weighted average grant-date fair value of shares granted, vested and forfeited during the fiscal year 2008:

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

Number

 

Average

 

 

 

of

 

Fair

 

 

 

Shares

 

Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-vested stock at April 29, 2007

 

99,981

 

$

19.80

 

Shares granted

 

 

 

Shares vested

 

(50,377

)

17.33

 

Shares forfeited

 

(9,437

)

20.47

 

Non-vested stock at April 27, 2008

 

40,167

 

$

22.73

 

 

The weighted average fair value of shares vested related to the Deferred Bonus Plan for fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006 is $873, $266 and $731, respectively.

 

Stock Repurchase – Since November 15, 2000, our Board of Directors has approved a stock repurchase program, as amended, allowing up to 6,000,000 shares of our common stock to be repurchased.  As of April 27, 2008, we have repurchased 4,895,792 shares of common stock, and retired 553,800 shares of common stock under this stock repurchase program.

 

57



 

10. Deferred Compensation Plans

 

2005 Deferred Compensation Plan - On January 11, 2005, we adopted the 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”), which amended and restated the prior deferred compensation arrangement. The Plan is an unfunded deferred compensation arrangement for the benefit of key management officers and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries. The terms of the Plan include the ability of the participants to defer, on a pre-tax basis, salary, bonus payments and any voluntary deferrals to the Company’s Retirement Trust and Savings Plan in excess of the amount permitted under IRS Code Section 401(k). The terms also allow for a discretionary annual matching contribution by the Company. The Plan allows for the aggregation and investment of deferred amounts in notional investment alternatives, including units representing shares of our common stock.   The liability related to the Plan as of fiscal 2008 and 2007 was $3,242 and $3,108, respectively.  Expense for our contributions related to the Plan was $85, $31 and $36 in fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively

 

11.  Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information

 

For the fiscal years ended April 27, 2008, April 29, 2007 and April 30, 2006 we made cash payments of interest, net of capitalized interest for $108,090, $90,620 and $88,360, respectively.  Additionally, we paid income taxes, net of refunds, of $7,949 and $18,528 in fiscal years 2008 and 2007, respectively and collected a refund, net of payments of $392 in fiscal year 2006.

 

For the fiscal year ended April 27, 2008 we purchased land financed with a note payable for $3,096.  Also, as discussed in Note 8, we acquired $4,247 of assets and obligations related to the Bettendorf Convention Center.

 

58



 

12. Income Taxes

 

Income tax (benefit) provision from continuing operations consists of the following (in thousands):

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

 

 

April 27,

 

April 29,

 

April 30,

 

 

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

Current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

$

(20,110

)

$

6,873

 

$

1,459

 

State

 

(466

)

1,244

 

2,040

 

 

 

(20,576

)

8,117

 

3,499

 

Deferred:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

(40,472

)

(8,362

)

2,298

 

State

 

(3,772

)

2,151

 

(169

)

 

 

(44,244

)

(6,211

)

2,129

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax (benefit) provision

 

$

(64,820

)

$

1,906

 

$

5,628

 

 

There is no international tax expense or benefit in our consolidated tax provision for any fiscal year because either our international operations are based in a jurisdiction that does not impose a corporate income tax or the jurisdiction only taxes our local operations and those local operations generate losses for which we have established full valuation allowances. These international losses will be tax benefited at such time that the related international operations generate operating earnings, subject to statutory limitations. Effective April 27, 2008, all of our international operations are subject to taxation in the United States.

 

A reconciliation of income taxes from continuing operations at the statutory corporate federal tax rate of 35% to the income tax (benefit) provision reported in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

 

 

April 27,

 

April 29,

 

April 30,

 

 

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

Statutory tax (benefit) provision

 

$

(54,889

)

$

(5,548

)

$

7,259

 

Effects of :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

State taxes

 

(5,895

)

2,451

 

1,575

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Various permanent differences

 

1,620

 

1,528

 

1,264

 

Goodwill impairment

 

 

2,730

 

 

Employment tax credits

 

(1,351

)

(1,798

)

(3,353

)

Change in state allowances

 

1,656

 

944

 

296

 

International operations

 

1,392

 

1,412

 

4,286

 

Capital loss

 

(3,136

)

 

 

Bad debt expense

 

(4,377

)

 

 

Minority interest

 

(1,943

)

(1,874

)

(2,605

)

Bahamas impairment

 

 

845

 

(870

)

Hurricane Katrina involuntary conversion

 

 

 

(1,843

)

Qualified stock option expense

 

845

 

1,103

 

 

Other

 

1,258

 

113

 

(381

)

Income tax (benefit) provision

 

$

(64,820

)

$

1,906

 

$

5,628

 

 

59



 

Significant components of our domestic net deferred income tax asset (liability) are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

 

 

April 27,

 

April 29,

 

 

 

2008

 

2007

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment

 

$

(24,560

)

$

(62,449

)

Other

 

(8,034

)

(4,661

)

Total deferred tax liabilities

 

(32,594

)

(67,110

)

Deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Accrued expenses

 

21,895

 

20,050

 

Alternative minimum tax credit

 

2,704

 

 

Employment tax credits

 

1,848

 

82

 

Capital loss carryover

 

1,576

 

1,451

 

Net operating losses

 

22,011

 

16,472

 

Other

 

12,277

 

7,586

 

Total deferred tax assets

 

62,311

 

45,641

 

Valuation allowance on deferred tax assets

 

(9,343

)

(7,561

)

Net deferred tax asset

 

52,968

 

38,080

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net deferred tax asset (liability)

 

$

20,374

 

$

(29,030

)

 

At April 27, 2008, we have federal net operating loss carryforwards of $30,452 for income tax purposes, with expiration dates from fiscal year 2011 to 2028. Approximately $26,406 of these net operating losses are attributable to IC Holdings Colorado, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary CCSC/Blackhawk, Inc. (“IC Holdings, Inc. & Sub”) and can only be used to offset income earned by these entities. The remaining federal net operating losses are subject to limitations under the internal revenue code and underlying treasury regulations, which may limit the amount ultimately utilized; however, we believe that all federal net operating losses will be utilized prior to expiration.  IC Holdings, Inc. & Sub also has a federal capital loss carryforward of $4,146 that expires in 2011 for which it has established a full valuation allowance because it does not expect to benefit from the capital loss. We also have state income tax net operating loss carryforwards of $216,549 with expiration dates from fiscal year 2009 to 2028. We have determined that it is more likely than not that we will not be able to utilize $134,723 of the state income tax net operating losses and have established a valuation reserve accordingly.  If or when recognized, the tax benefits relating to any reversal of the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets at April 27, 2008 will be accounted for as follows: approximately $4,651 will be recognized as a reduction of income tax expense, $4,692 will be recognized as a reduction of goodwill.  We also have a federal general business credit carryforward of $1,848 for income tax purposes, which expires in the fiscal year 2027.  We believe that these credits will be utilized prior to expiration. Deferred income taxes related to NOL carryforwards have been classified as noncurrent to reflect the expected utilization of the carryforwards.  The property and equipment deferred tax liability at April 27, 2008 is net of the deferred tax asset related to the Coventry impairment of $29,295.

 

We adopted the provisions of FIN No. 48 on April 30, 2007. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have any impact on our consolidated statement of operations or stockholders’ equity within the consolidated balance sheet. We had a total of $24,152 and $21,819 of unrecognized tax benefits as of April 30, 2007 and April 27, 2008, respectively.  A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits are as follows:

 

 

 

April 27,

 

 

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at April 30, 2007

 

$

24,152

 

Gross increases - tax positions in current period

 

949

 

Gross increases - tax positions in prior periods

 

8,539

 

Gross decreases - tax positions in prior periods

 

(486

)

Settlements

 

(11,335

)

Lapse of statute of limitations

 

 

Balance at April 27, 2008

 

$

21,819

 

 

Included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at April 27, 2008 are $8,128 of tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate.  Also included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at April 27, 2008 are $9,318 of tax benefits that, if recognized, would result in adjustments to deferred taxes.

 

60



 

We recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. This policy did not change as a result of the adoption of FIN 48. Related to the unrecognized tax benefits noted above, we accrued interest of $3,250 and no penalties during the fiscal year ended 2008.  In total, as of April 27, 2008, we have recognized a liability of $5,513 for interest and no amount for penalties.

 

We believe that an increase in unrecognized tax benefits related to federal and state exposures in the coming year, though possible, cannot be reasonably estimated and will not be significant.  In addition, we believe that it is reasonably possible that an amount between $7,900 and $12,000 of its currently remaining unrecognized tax positions may be recognized by the end of the fiscal year ending April 26, 2009.  These amounts relate to positions taken or to be taken on federal, Louisiana, and Mississippi income tax returns for the fiscal years ending April 2002 through April 2007. These amounts are expected to be resolved during the next twelve months as a result of the anticipated completion of federal, Louisiana, and Mississippi income tax examinations as well as the filing of amended income tax returns.

 

We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various state jurisdictions, and foreign jurisdictions. As of April 27, 2008, we were no longer subject to examination of our U.S. federal income tax returns filed for tax years prior to 2004, due to statute expirations and settlements. The IRS is currently examining our federal income tax returns for the 2004 and 2005 tax years which relate to our fiscal years ended April 24, 2005 and April 30, 2006, respectively. In addition, various state jurisdictions are currently examining our state income tax returns for various subsidiaries. The tax returns for subsequent years are also subject to examination.

 

We file in numerous state jurisdictions with varying statutes of limitations. Our unrecognized state tax benefits are related to state tax returns open from tax years 2001 through 2007 depending on each state’s statute of limitations.

 

  13. Hurricanes and Related Charges

 

In the fall of 2005, our properties in Biloxi, Mississippi, Lake Charles, Louisiana and Pompano Beach, Florida were struck by Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma, respectively.

 

We have insurance coverage related to the three hurricanes for property damage and destruction, and business interruption insurance for incremental costs incurred and for lost profits. We have received partial proceeds from our insurance carriers related to losses we have sustained.  Our belief is we will ultimately collect more than the $75,868 related to the property impairment as the insurance coverage is for replacement value and the insurance receivable recorded for the property impairment represents the net book value of the assets at the date of loss.  In addition, we have not yet received proof of losses on open claims under the business interruption loss of profits coverage related to the claim in Biloxi. We continue to negotiate with our insurers to settle our claims.  The timeline for final settlement of the claims is expected to occur within one year.  Actual insurance receipts in excess of our insurance receivable for loss of income claims are recorded as food, beverage, and other revenues. Other insurance proceeds received above any insurance receivable are shown as a reduction of expense in a component of income from operations.

 

The following table shows the activity flowing through the hurricane insurance accounts:

 

 

 

Total Incurred as of

 

 

 

April 27,

 

April 29,

 

 

 

2008

 

2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property impairment (1)

 

$

75,868

 

$

75,868

 

Incremental costs incurred (2)

 

85,639

 

84,793

 

Loss of income (3)

 

2,817

 

2,817

 

Hurricane related charges, net (4)

 

(3,019

)

(4,776

)

Insurance receivable, gross

 

161,305

 

158,702

 

Insurance receipts

 

(153,755

)

(102,662

)

Insurance receivable, net of receipts

 

$

7,550

 

$

56,040

 

 


(1) Represents the book value of property impairments recognized at the date of loss as a receivable under our insurance policies.

(2) Insured incremental costs incurred by us totaling $85,639 were recorded as an insurance receivable for $847, $22,617, and $62,174 in fiscal years 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.

 

61



 

(3) During fiscal 2007, we recorded a gain and insurance receivable of $2,817 as the result of a proof of loss under the business interruption-lost profits coverage.

(4) Primarily represents deductibles under insurance policies recorded as a hurricane related charge during fiscal 2006 which has been partially offset by $1,757 gain on settlement of the Hurricane Rita claim in fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008.

 

In connection with flooding in the Midwest during April 2008, our Natchez, Mississippi and Davenport, Iowa, locations closed.  As a result, the Company has incurred additional expense of $139 above the insurance deductible which is included in the insurance receivable in the consolidated balance sheet.

 

Subsequent to our fiscal year end, we received $4,836 of cash which reduced the receivable and related to the settlement of the Hurricane Rita claim.

 

14. Discontinued Operations

 

On July 31, 2006, we completed the sale of our Bossier City and Vicksburg properties for cash proceeds of $238,725 net of transaction costs and a working capital adjustment.

 

On April 25, 2005, the Company and Colorado Grande executed a Stock Purchase Agreement with a subsidiary of Nevada Gold & Casinos, Inc. (“Nevada Gold”) to sell all outstanding shares of the common stock of Colorado Grande to a subsidiary of Nevada Gold. A subsidiary of Nevada Gold was the (43%) minority owner of Isle of Capri Black Hawk, L.L.C. prior to our purchase of their minority interest. The aggregate estimated sales price agreed to was $6,500 payable: (a) $600 in cash upon closing and, (b) a $5,900 promissory note secured by the stock of Colorado Grande and Nevada Gold’s future membership distributions from the Isle-Black Hawk until the note was fully repaid. This note was fully repaid during fiscal year 2008.  The balance outstanding under this note was $1,273 as of April 29, 2007.

 

The estimated sales price was adjusted by the difference between actual working capital and a target working capital (as defined by the Sales Agreement) on the closing date. The post closing adjustment to adjust the actual working capital to the target working capital was made during the fiscal year ended April 30, 2006 for the Colorado Grande-Cripple Creek property sale and approximately $800 in cash was paid to us by Nevada Gold.

 

The results of our discontinued operations are summarized as follows:

 

 

 

Discontinued Operations

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended

 

 

 

April 29,

 

April 30,

 

 

 

2007

 

2006

 

Net revenues

 

$

41,291

 

$

166,361

 

Gain on sale of discontinued operations

 

23,244

 

 

Pretax income from discontinued operations

 

5,599

 

16,874

 

Income tax provision from discontinued operations

 

(12,151

)

(6,630

)

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

 

16,692

 

10,244

 

 

Net interest expense of $3,312 and $12,973 for fiscal years 2007 and 2006, respectively, has been allocated to discontinued operations based on the ratio of net assets to be sold to the sum of total net assets of the Company plus our debt that was not attributable to a particular operation in accordance with EITF 87-24, “Allocation of Interest to Discontinued Operations.”

 

15. Employee Benefit Plan

 

401(k) Plan – We have a 401(k) plan covering substantially all of our employees who have completed one year of service. Expense for our contributions related to the 401(k) plan was $759, $1,921 and $1,669 in fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Our contribution is based on a percentage of employee contributions and may include an additional discretionary amount. The 401(k) plan allows employees to invest no more than 5% of their contribution in our common stock.

 

16. Related Party Transactions

 

We lease approximately eight acres of land on a month-to-month basis from an entity owned by our chairman and members of his family. The land is used for parking and warehouse space by the Isle-Bettendorf. The initial term of the lease expires sixty days after written notice is given to either party and rent under the lease is currently $23 per month.

 

62



 

We reimbursed Alter Trading Corporation (a private entity owned by our chairman and his family) for annual lease payments of approximately $34, $46 and $119 in fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, for property leased by Alter Trading Corporation. The land was leased at our request in order to secure sites for possible casino operations.

 

A member of the Board of Directors has provided consulting services to us related to on-going contracts and real estate transactions in the United States. The total fees paid were $78 and $56 plus expenses in fiscal years 2008 and 2007.

 

In 2004, we entered into a contract with a member of the Board of Directors for consulting fees related to on-going contracts and transactions in the United Kingdom. The total fees paid under this contract were $60 in fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

 

In 2005, one of our wholly owned subsidiaries, Isle of Capri Bettendorf, L.C., entered into a Development Agreement with the City of Bettendorf, Iowa and Green Bridge Company relating to the development of a conference/events center in Bettendorf, Iowa, the expansion of the hotel at Bettendorf and related facilities, including a skywalk between the hotel and conference/events center and a parking facility. Green Bridge Company is indirectly wholly owned by our chairman and members of his family. As part of the transaction, Isle of Capri Bettendorf, L.C. purchased certain real estate owned by Green Bridge Company at its fair market value of $393 in fiscal year 2008. Isle of Capri Bettendorf, L.C. will hold Green Bridge Company harmless from certain future increases in assessments on adjacent property owned by Green Bridge Company, capped at $4,500.

 

63



 

17 . Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value:

 

Assets, including cash, restricted cash and notes receivable are carried at cost, which approximates fair value due to their short-term maturities.

 

Marketable securities consist of trading securities held by Capri Insurance Corporation, our captive insurance subsidiary. The trading securities are primarily debt and equity securities which we buy with the intention to resell in the near term. Our trading securities are carried at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in current period consolidated statements of operations.

 

The fair value of our long-term debt is estimated based on the quoted market price of the underlying debt issue or, when a quoted market price is not available, the discounted cash flow of future payments utilizing current rates available to us for debt of similar remaining maturities. Debt obligations with a short remaining maturity are valued at the carrying amount. The estimated carrying amounts and fair values of our financial instruments are as follows:

 

 

 

April 27, 2008

 

April 29, 2007

 

 

 

Carrying

 

 

 

Carrying

 

 

 

 

 

Amount

 

Fair Value

 

Amount

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

91,790

 

$

91,790

 

$

188,114

 

$

188,114

 

Marketable securities

 

18,533

 

18,533

 

17,169

 

17,169

 

Restricted cash

 

4,802

 

4,802

 

4,637

 

4,637

 

Notes receivable

 

5,000

 

5,000

 

6,280

 

6,280

 

Interest rate swaps

 

 

 

528

 

528

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revolver

 

$

130,500

 

$

130,500

 

$

 

$

 

Variable rate term loans

 

869,313

 

756,302

 

 

 

7% Senior subordinated notes

 

500,000

 

377,500

 

500,000

 

490,500

 

Senior secured credit facility

 

 

 

503,500

 

503,500

 

9% Senior subordinated notes

 

 

 

200,000

 

209,250

 

Isle-Black Hawk senior secured credit facility

 

 

 

203,550

 

203,550

 

Blue Chip Credit Facility

 

1,262

 

1,262

 

6,157

 

6,157

 

Other long-term debt

 

6,214

 

6,214

 

4,772

 

4,685

 

Interest rate swaps

 

13,714

 

13,714

 

 

 

Other long-term obligations

 

52,305

 

52,305

 

47,639

 

47,639

 

 

64



 

18. Consolidating Condensed Financial Information

 

Certain of our wholly owned subsidiaries have fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several basis, the payment of all obligations under our 7% Senior Subordinated Notes.

 

The following wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company are co-borrowers, on a joint and several basis, under the July 2007 Credit Facility and are guarantors of the 7% Senior Subordinated Notes: Riverboat Corporation of Mississippi; Riverboat Services, Inc.; CSNO, L.L.C.; St. Charles Gaming Company, Inc.; IOC Holdings, L.L.C.; Grand Palais Riverboat, Inc.; LRGP Holdings, L.L.C.; P.P.I, Inc.; Isle of Capri Casino Colorado, Inc.; IOC-Coahoma, Inc.; IOC-Natchez, Inc.; IOC-Lula, Inc.; IOC-Boonville, Inc.; IOC-Kansas City, Inc.; Isle of Capri Bettendorf, L.C.; Isle of Capri Bettendorf Marina Corp.; Isle of Capri Marquette, Inc.; IOC-Davenport, Inc.; IOC-St. Louis County, Inc.; IOC-Black Hawk County, Inc.; IOC-PA, L.L.C.; IOC-City of St. Louis, L.L.C.; IOC-Manufacturing, Inc.; Riverboat Corporation of Mississippi — Vicksburg Isle of Capri Black Hawk, L.L.C.; Isle of Capri Black Hawk Capital Corp.; IC Holdings Colorado, Inc.; CCSC/Blackhawk, Inc.; and IOC-Black Hawk Distribution Company, L.L.C.; Casino America of Colorado, Inc.; Black Hawk Holdings, L.L.C. and IOC-Caruthersville, L.L.C.  Each of the subsidiaries’ guarantees is joint and several with the guarantees of the other subsidiaries.

 

The following subsidiaries are not guarantors or co-borrowers under the July 2007 Credit Facility or the 7% Senior Subordinated Notes: Blue Chip Casinos, PLC; Isle of Capri of Jefferson County, Inc.; IOC-Mississippi, Inc.; Casino Parking, Inc.; Isle of Capri-Bahamas, Ltd.; IOC-Bahamas Holding, Inc.; ASMI Management, Inc.; IOC Development Company, L.L.C.; Casino America, Inc.; International Marco Polo Services, Inc.; Isle of Capri of Michigan L.L.C.; IOC Services, L.L.C.; Capri Air, Inc.; Lady Luck Gaming Corp.; Lady Luck Gulfport, Inc.; Lady Luck Vicksburg, Inc.; Lady Luck Biloxi, Inc.; Lady Luck Central City, Inc.; Pompano Park Holdings, L.L.C; JPLA Pelican, L.L.C.; IOC-Cameron, L.L.C.; The Isle of Capri Casinos Limited, IOC Pittsburgh, Inc. and Capri Insurance Corporation.

 

65



 

Consolidating condensed balance sheets as of April 27, 2008 and April 29, 2007 are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

As of April 27, 2008

 

 

 

Isle of Capri

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidating

 

 

 

 

 

Casinos, Inc.

 

 

 

Non-

 

and

 

Isle of Capri

 

 

 

(Parent

 

Guarantor

 

Guarantor

 

Eliminating

 

Casinos, Inc.

 

 

 

Obligor)

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Entries

 

Consolidated

 

Balance Sheet

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

 

$

46,683

 

$

107,235

 

$

45,568

 

$

(105

)

$

199,381

 

Intercompany receivables

 

1,441,591

 

(382,547

)

20,394

 

(1,079,438

)

 

Investments in subsidiaries

 

162,496

 

 

 

(162,496

)

 

Property and equipment, net

 

18,714

 

1,238,222

 

72,050

 

 

1,328,986

 

Other assets

 

70,358

 

368,316

 

7,125

 

 

445,799

 

Total assets

 

$

1,739,842

 

$

1,331,226

 

$

145,137

 

$

(1,242,039

)

$

1,974,166

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

 

$

38,368

 

$

107,672

 

$

37,502

 

$

(105

)

$

183,437

 

Intercompany payables

 

 

889,382

 

190,056

 

(1,079,438

)

 

Long-term debt, less current maturities

 

1,491,063

 

5,041

 

1,487

 

 

1,497,591

 

Other accrued liabilities

 

22,399

 

24,670

 

58,057

 

 

105,126

 

Minority interest

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity

 

188,012

 

304,461

 

(141,965

)

(162,496

)

188,012

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

1,739,842

 

$

1,331,226

 

$

145,137

 

$

(1,242,039

)

$

1,974,166

 

 

 

 

As of April 29, 2007

 

 

 

Isle of Capri

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidating

 

 

 

 

 

Casinos, Inc.

 

 

 

Non-

 

and

 

Isle of Capri

 

 

 

(Parent

 

Guarantor

 

Guarantor

 

Eliminating

 

Casinos, Inc.

 

 

 

Obligor)

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Entries

 

Consolidated

 

Balance Sheet

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

 

$

98,116

 

$

170,803

 

$

51,491

 

$

(72

)

$

320,338

 

Intercompany receivables

 

1,135,623

 

(459,025

)

(61,730

)

(614,868

)

 

Investments in subsidiaries

 

270,176

 

 

 

(270,176

)

 

Property and equipment, net

 

19,644

 

1,178,899

 

140,027

 

 

1,338,570

 

Other assets

 

19,250

 

395,923

 

7,410

 

(5,800

)

416,783

 

Total assets

 

$

1,542,809

 

$

1,286,600

 

$

137,198

 

$

(890,916

)

$

2,075,691

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

 

$

61,585

 

$

139,007

 

$

39,556

 

$

(4,407

)

$

235,741

 

Intercompany payables

 

15

 

542,726

 

70,731

 

(613,472

)

 

Long-term debt,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

less current maturities

 

1,200,500

 

205,359

 

4,526

 

 

1,410,385

 

Other accrued liabilities, deferred taxes and long-term obligations 

 

(1,113

)

71,136

 

49,884

 

 

119,907

 

Minority interest

 

 

 

 

27,836

 

27,836

 

Stockholders’ equity

 

281,822

 

328,372

 

(27,499

)

(300,873

)

281,822

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

1,542,809

 

$

1,286,600

 

$

137,198

 

$

(890,916

)

$

2,075,691

 

 

66



 

Consolidating condensed statements of operations for the fiscal years ended April 27, 2008, April 29, 2007 and April 30, 2006 are as follows:

 

 

 

For the Fiscal Year Ended April 27, 2008

 

 

 

Isle of Capri

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidating

 

 

 

 

 

Casinos, Inc.

 

 

 

Non-

 

and

 

Isle of Capri

 

 

 

(Parent

 

Guarantor

 

Guarantor

 

Eliminating

 

Casinos, Inc.

 

Statement of Operations

 

Obligor)

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Entries

 

Consolidated

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Casino

 

$

 

$

1,092,292

 

$

29,568

 

$

 

$

1,121,860

 

Rooms, food, beverage and other

 

359

 

199,582

 

18,149

 

(13,015

)

205,075

 

Gross revenues

 

359

 

1,291,874

 

47,717

 

(13,015

)

1,326,935

 

Less promotional allowances

 

 

(200,141

)

(1,442

)

 

(201,583

)

Net revenues

 

359

 

1,091,733

 

46,275

 

(13,015

)

1,125,352

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Casino

 

 

150,925

 

12,325

 

 

163,250

 

Gaming taxes

 

 

285,444

 

2,958

 

 

288,402

 

Rooms, food, beverage and other

 

55,822

 

409,426

 

121,420

 

(13,015

)

573,653

 

Management fee expense (revenue)

 

(29,886

)

37,635

 

(7,749

)

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

5,089

 

123,264

 

7,774

 

 

136,127

 

Total operating expenses

 

31,025

 

1,006,694

 

136,728

 

(13,015

)

1,161,432

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating income (loss)

 

(30,666

)

85,039

 

(90,453

)

 

(36,080

)

Interest expense, net

 

(25,196

)

(71,037

)

(9,239

)

 

(105,472

)

Loss on extinguishment of debt

 

(13,660

)

(1,614

)

 

 

(15,274

)

Equity in income (loss) of subsidiaries

 

(98,617

)

 

 

98,617

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interest

 

(168,139

)

12,388

 

(99,692

)

98,617

 

(156,826

)

Income tax (provision) benefit

 

71,265

 

(1,094

)

(5,351

)

 

64,820

 

Minority interest

 

 

(4,868

)

 

 

(4,868

)

Net income (loss)

 

$

(96,874

)

$

6,426

 

$

(105,043

)

$

98,617

 

$

(96,874

)

 

 

 

For the Fiscal Year Ended April 29, 2007

 

 

 

Isle of Capri

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidating

 

 

 

 

 

Casinos, Inc.

 

 

 

Non-

 

and

 

Isle of Capri

 

 

 

(Parent

 

Guarantor

 

Guarantor

 

Eliminating

 

Casinos, Inc.

 

Statement of Operations

 

Obligor)

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Entries

 

Consolidated

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Casino

 

$

 

$

991,399

 

$

24,230

 

$

 

$

1,015,629

 

Rooms, food, beverage and other

 

94

 

196,578

 

17,806

 

(14,255

)

200,223

 

Gross revenues

 

94

 

1,187,977

 

42,036

 

(14,255

)

1,215,852

 

Less promotional allowances

 

 

(213,624

)

(834

)

 

(214,458

)

Net revenues

 

94

 

974,353

 

41,202

 

(14,255

)

1,001,394

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Casino

 

 

153,288

 

6,246

 

 

159,534

 

Gaming taxes

 

 

213,715

 

(3,311

)

 

210,404

 

Rooms, food, beverage and other

 

49,643

 

387,095

 

42,508

 

(13,122

)

466,124

 

Management fee expense (revenue)

 

(31,350

)

37,585

 

(6,235

)

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

1,955

 

94,268

 

3,283

 

 

99,506

 

Total operating expenses

 

20,248

 

885,951

 

42,491

 

(13,122

)

935,568

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating income (loss)

 

(20,154

)

88,402

 

(1,289

)

(1,133

)

65,826

 

Interest expense, net

 

(27,772

)

(46,186

)

(5,118

)

(2,605

)

(81,681

)

Equity in income (loss) of subsidiaries

 

9,114

 

 

 

(9,114

)

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and minority interest

 

(38,812

)

42,216

 

(6,407

)

(12,852

)

(15,855

)

Income tax (provision) benefit

 

17,483

 

(19,093

)

(296

)

 

(1,906

)

Minority interest

 

 

 

 

(3,568

)

(3,568

)

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

(21,329

)

23,123

 

(6,703

)

(16,420

)

(21,329

)

Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

 

 

16,692

 

 

 

16,692

 

Equity in earnings of discontinued operations

 

16,692

 

 

 

(16,692

)

 

Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

 

16,692

 

16,692

 

 

(16,692

)

16,692

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(4,637

)

$

39,815

 

$

(6,703

)

$

(33,112

)

$

(4,637

)

 

67



 

 

 

For the Fiscal Year Ended April 30, 2006

 

 

 

Isle of Capri

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidating

 

 

 

 

 

Casinos, Inc.

 

 

 

Non-

 

and

 

Isle of Capri

 

 

 

(Parent

 

Guarantor

 

Guarantor

 

Eliminating

 

Casinos, Inc.

 

Statement of Operations

 

Obligor)

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Entries

 

Consolidated

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Casino

 

$

 

$

973,648

 

$

30,495

 

$

 

$

1,004,143

 

Rooms, food, beverage and other

 

146

 

177,717

 

17,428

 

(11,901

)

183,390

 

Gross revenues

 

146

 

1,151,365

 

47,923

 

(11,901

)

1,187,533

 

Less promotional allowances

 

 

(198,768

)

(1,406

)

 

(200,174

)

Net revenues

 

146

 

952,597

 

46,517

 

(11,901

)

987,359

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Casino

 

 

144,201

 

7,659

 

 

151,860

 

Gaming taxes

 

 

214,642

 

4,723

 

 

219,365

 

Rooms, food, beverage and other

 

41,582

 

330,005

 

63,338

 

(4,081

)

430,844

 

Management fee expense (revenue)

 

(34,172

)

41,617

 

(7,445

)

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

1,540

 

83,405

 

6,429

 

(2,556

)

88,818

 

Total operating expenses

 

8,950

 

813,870

 

74,704

 

(6,637

)

890,887

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating income (loss)

 

(8,804

)

138,727

 

(28,187

)

(5,264

)

96,472

 

Interest expense, net

 

(14,508

)

(44,053

)

(2,405

)

(12,675

)

(73,641

)

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

 

 

(2,110

)

 

 

(2,110

)

Equity in income (loss) of subsidiaries

 

24,633

 

 

 

(24,633

)

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and minority interest

 

1,321

 

92,564

 

(30,592

)

(42,572

)

20,721

 

Income tax (provision) benefit

 

7,310

 

(16,822

)

3,884

 

 

(5,628

)

Minority interest

 

 

 

 

(6,462

)

(6,462

)

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

8,631

 

75,742

 

(26,708

)

(49,034

)

8,631

 

Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

 

 

10,460

 

(216

)

 

10,244

 

Equity in earnings of discontinued operations

 

10,244

 

 

 

(10,244

)

 

Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

 

10,244

 

10,460

 

(216

)

(10,244

)

10,244

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

18,875

 

$

86,202

 

$

(26,924

)

$

(59,278

)

$

18,875

 

 

68



 

Consolidating condensed statements of cash flows for the fiscal years ended April 27, 2008, April 29, 2007 and April 30, 2006 are as follows:

 

 

 

For the Fiscal Year Ended April 27, 2008

 

 

 

Isle of Capri

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidating

 

 

 

 

 

Casinos, Inc.

 

 

 

Non-

 

and

 

Isle of Capri

 

 

 

(Parent

 

Guarantor

 

Guarantor

 

Eliminating

 

Casinos, Inc.

 

Statement of Cash Flows

 

Obligor)

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Entries

 

Consolidated

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

$

(59,756

)

$

204,239

 

$

(11,126

)

$

 

$

133,357

 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

 

(301,245

)

(271,981

)

(20,507

)

291,287

 

(302,446

)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

283,469

 

49,816

 

30,516

 

(291,287

)

72,514

 

Effect of foreign currency exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents

 

 

 

251

 

 

251

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

(77,532

)

(17,926

)

(866

)

 

(96,324

)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period

 

82,895

 

85,466

 

19,753

 

 

188,114

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period

 

$

5,363

 

$

67,540

 

$

18,887

 

$

 

$

91,790

 

 

 

 

For the Fiscal Year Ended April 29, 2007

 

 

 

Isle of Capri

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidating

 

 

 

 

 

Casinos, Inc.

 

 

 

Non-

 

and

 

Isle of Capri

 

 

 

(Parent

 

Guarantor

 

Guarantor

 

Eliminating

 

Casinos, Inc.

 

Statement of Cash Flows

 

Obligor)

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Entries

 

Consolidated

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

$

(382

)

$

79,308

 

$

(8,031

)

$

 

$

70,895

 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

 

16,105

 

(149,463

)

(118,495

)

54,582

 

(197,271

)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

37,980

 

72,887

 

137,253

 

(54,582

)

193,538

 

Effect of foreign currency exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents

 

 

 

(97

)

 

(97

)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

53,703

 

2,732

 

10,630

 

 

67,065

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period

 

29,192

 

82,734

 

9,123

 

 

121,049

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period

 

$

82,895

 

$

85,466

 

$

19,753

 

$

 

$

188,114

 

 

69



 

 

 

For the Fiscal Year Ended April 30, 2006

 

 

 

Isle of Capri

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidating

 

 

 

 

 

Casinos, Inc.

 

 

 

Non-

 

and

 

Isle of Capri

 

 

 

(Parent

 

Guarantor

 

Guarantor

 

Eliminating

 

Casinos, Inc.

 

Statement of Cash Flows

 

Obligor)

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Entries

 

Consolidated

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

$

(84,861

)

$

217,927

 

$

(46,391

)

$

 

$

86,675

 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

 

(89,463

)

(159,967

)

(9,662

)

82,656

 

(176,436

)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

149,932

 

(47,543

)

45,175

 

(82,656

)

64,908

 

Effect of foreign currency exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents

 

 

 

(575

)

 

(575

)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

(24,392

)

10,417

 

(11,453

)

 

(25,428

)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period

 

53,584

 

72,317

 

20,576

 

 

146,477

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period

 

$

29,192

 

$

82,734

 

$

9,123

 

$

 

$

121,049

 

 

70



 

19. Selected Quarterly Financial Information (unaudited)

 

 

 

Fiscal Quarters Ended

 

 

 

July 29,

 

October 28,

 

January 27,

 

April 27,

 

 

 

2007

 

2007

 

2008

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net revenues

 

$

278,533

 

$

278,838

 

$

269,665

 

$

298,316

 

Operating income

 

18,046

 

2,304

 

6,279

 

(62,709

)

Net loss

 

(7,115

)

(24,635

)

(13,849

)

(51,275

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss per common share basic and diluted

 

$

(0.23

)

$

(0.80

)

$

(0.45

)

$

(1.66

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average basic and diluted shares

 

30,417,036

 

30,726,768

 

30,836,139

 

30,845,436

 

 

 

 

Fiscal Quarters Ended

 

 

 

July 30,

 

October 29,

 

January 28,

 

April 29,

 

 

 

2006

 

2006

 

2007

 

2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net revenues

 

$

273,968

 

$

243,224

 

$

230,839

 

$

253,363

 

Operating income

 

31,340

 

13,959

 

9,707

 

10,820

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

5,328

 

(4,187

)

(9,346

)

(13,124

)

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

 

3,956

 

13,817

 

416

 

(1,497

)

Net income (loss)

 

9,284

 

9,630

 

(8,930

)

(14,621

)

Earnings (loss) per common share basic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

$

0.18

 

$

(0.14

)

$

(0.31

)

$

(0.43

)

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

 

0.13

 

0.46

 

0.02

 

(0.05

)

Net income (loss)

 

$

0.31

 

$

0.32

 

$

(0.29

)

$

(0.48

)

Earnings (loss) per common share diluted:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

$

0.17

 

$

(0.14

)

$

(0.31

)

$

(0.43

)

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

 

0.13

 

0.46

 

0.02

 

(0.05

)

Net income (loss)

 

$

0.30

 

$

0.32

 

$

(0.29

)

$

(0.48

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average basic shares

 

30,422,077

 

30,346,015

 

30,371,020

 

30,400,245

 

Weighted average diluted shares

 

31,403,879

 

30,346,015

 

30,371,020

 

30,400,245

 

 

We opened new casino operations in Pompano, Waterloo, and Coventry in April 2007, June 2007, and July 2007, respectively.  We acquired our casino operations in Caruthersville in June 2007.

 

A summary of certain revenues and expenses impacting our quarterly financial results is as follows:

 

 

 

Fiscal Quarters Ended

 

 

 

July 29,

 

October 28,

 

January 27,

 

April 27,

 

 

 

2007

 

2007

 

2008

 

2008

 

(Expense) Revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Write-offs and Valuation Charges

 

 

(6,526

)

 

(78,658

)

Preopening

 

(6,133

)

(324

)

 

 

Insurance recoveries

 

348

 

 

 

1,757

 

Development costs

 

(1,523

)

(799

)

(1,546

)

(1,672

)

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

 

(2,192

)

(11,468

)

 

(1,614

)

 

 

 

Fiscal Quarters Ended

 

 

 

July 30,

 

October 29,

 

January 28,

 

April 29,

 

 

 

2006

 

2006

 

2007

 

2007

 

(Expense) Revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Write-offs and Valuation Charges

 

 

(665

)

 

(7,801

)

Preopening

 

(249

)

(389

)

(2,499

)

(10,436

)

Insurance recoveries

 

 

 

2,817

 

 

Our Lucaya lease termination and settlement

 

(2,250

)

 

 

11,776

 

Development costs

 

(4,727

)

(4,534

)

(5,393

)

(1,608

)

Corporate office relocation

 

(2,608

)

(988

)

(1,122

)

(670

)

 

71



 

Write-offs and Valuation Charges – During fiscal year 2008, we recorded $78,658 in impairment charges related to our UK operations and $6,526 of charges primarily related to costs previously capitalized in connection with a proposed project in west Harrison County, Mississippi and the write-off of construction projects in Davenport, Iowa and Kansas City, Missouri, and.  In fiscal year 2007 we recorded $665 in impairment charges related to our Blue Chip operations and $7,801 in goodwill impairment related to our operations in Lula, Mississippi.

 

Preopening expense – Were incurred prior to the opening of our casinos in Pompano, Waterloo and Coventry.

 

Insurance recoveries – Reflect primarily receipts relating to business interruption claims.

 

Loss on extinguishment of debt – During fiscal year 2008, we extinguished our 9% Subordinated Notes and Black Hawk Credit Facility, and we refinanced our February 2005Credit Facility.

 

Our Lucaya lease termination and settlement – During the first quarter of fiscal year 2007 we terminated our lease in Our Lucaya resulting in an expense of $2,250. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 we reached a settlement reinstating our lease and other items, and retroactively reducing our gaming taxes resulting in income of $9,526.

 

Development Expenses – Expenses include costs for the pursuit of opportunities for new gaming facilities to expand our business.  The level of such expenses is subject to change based upon the level of development activities.

 

Corporate Office Relocation – During fiscal year 2007 we relocated our corporate office from Biloxi, Mississippi to St. Louis, Missouri.

 

20. Commitments and Contingencies

 

Blue Chip Casinos, Ltd. - In November 2003, pursuant to a subscription and shareholders agreement, the Isle of Capri Casinos, Ltd. (the “Isle-Ltd.”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, acquired a two-thirds interest in Blue Chip. Under the agreement, the Isle-Ltd. has the option to require the minority shareholders to sell their respective shares to the Isle-Ltd at fair value or at a price to be agreed upon.  This option is available for a period of two years from the later of five years after the acquisition date or for three years after the introduction of new gaming laws.  If the Isle-Ltd. does not exercise its option, the minority shareholders have the right, during the one-year period after the option expiration date, to require the Isle-Ltd. to purchase the minority shares at fair value or at a price to be agreed upon.  Due to the current uncertainty in United Kingdom gaming legislation and the long-term nature of this option, the impact of this obligation is not reasonably estimable at this time.

 

Operating Leases - Future minimum payments over the lease term of non-cancelable operating leases with initial terms of one year or more consisted of the following at April 27, 2008:

 

Fiscal Years Ending:

 

 

 

2009

 

$

21,670

 

2010

 

16,912

 

2011

 

15,728

 

2012

 

15,486

 

2013

 

15,537

 

Thereafter

 

587,742

 

Total minimum lease payments

 

$

673,075

 

 

Rent expense was approximately $37,794, $41,060 and $36,051 in fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.  Such amounts include contingent rentals of $9,182, $10,208 and $9,559 in fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

 

Our Lucaya - During fiscal 2007, as part of our agreement with the Bahamian government, we obtained a retroactive reduction in our gaming tax rate to be applied to the casinos historical and future gaming revenues.  This resulted in our reversing expense, in fiscal year 2007, of approximately $6,856 in previously accrued estimated gaming taxes.  We also agreed with the Bahamian government on a receivable related to a marketing subsidy for the casino.  Under this agreement, we reversed a $1,500 reserve allowance we had previously recorded against this marketing subsidy receivable.

 

Legal and Regulatory Proceedings - Lady Luck Gaming Corporation (now our wholly owned subsidiary) and several joint venture partners have been defendants in the Greek Civil Court and the Greek Administrative Court in similar lawsuits brought by the country of Greece through its Minister of Tourism (now Development) and Finance.  The actions allege that the defendants failed to make specified payments in connection with the gaming license bid process for Patras, Greece.  Although it is difficult to determine the damages being sought from the lawsuits, the action may seek damages up to that aggregate amount plus interest from the date of the action.  Through April 27, 2008, we have accrued an estimated liability including interest of $8,910.  The Athens Civil Court of First Instance granted judgment in our favor and dismissed the civil lawsuit.  Appeals to both the Athens Civil Appeals Court and the Greek Civil Supreme Court have been dismissed.  The Greek Civil Supreme Court denied the appeal on the basis that the Administrative Court is the competent court to hear the matter.  During October 2005, after the administrative lawsuit had been dismissed by both the Athens Administrative Court of First Instance and the Athens Administrative Court of Appeals on the basis that the Administrative Court did not have a jurisdiction, the Administrative Supreme Court remanded the matter back to the Athens Administrative Appeals Court for a hearing on the merits, which court in May 2008 rendered judgment in our favor on procedural grounds and not on the merits.  We expect the Greek government to appeal this decision to the Administrative Supreme Court.  Therefore, the outcome of this matter is still in doubt and cannot be predicted with any degree of certainty.  We intend to continue a vigorous and appropriate defense to the claims asserted in this matter.

 

 

72



 

We are subject to certain federal, state and local environmental protection, health and safety laws, regulations and ordinances that apply to businesses generally, and are subject to cleanup requirements at certain of our facilities as a result thereof.  We have not made, and do not anticipate making, material expenditures, nor do we anticipate incurring delays with respect to environmental remediation or protection.  However, in part because our present and future development sites have, in some cases, been used as manufacturing facilities or other facilities that generate materials that are required to be remediated under environmental laws and regulations, there can be no guarantee that additional pre-existing conditions will not be discovered and we will not experience material liabilities or delays.

 

We are subject to various contingencies and litigation matters and have a number of unresolved claims.  Although the ultimate liability of these contingencies, this litigation and these claims cannot be determined at this time, we believe they will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

Subsequent Event – Subsequent to fiscal year end 2008, we reached an agreement terminating our agreement for the potential development of a casino project in Portland Oregon.  As a part of this agreement, we agreed to terminate our rights under a land option and to pay a termination fee. As a result of this termination, we plan to record a $6,000 charge in our first quarter of fiscal 2009 consisting of a write-off of $5,000 representing our rights under the land option and $1,000 termination fee.  Under the terms of the agreement we retain certain rights but no continuing obligations with regard to this development project.

 

73



 

ISLE OF CAPRI CASINOS, INC.

 

SCHEDULE II – VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

(In thousands)

 

Accounts Receivable Reserve

 

Period

 

Balance at
Beginning of
Year

 

Charged to
Costs and
Expenses

 

Deductions from
Reserves

 

Balance at End
of Year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended April 27, 2008

 

$

4,335

 

$

3,407

 

$

3,484

 

$

4,258

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended April 29, 2007

 

1,909

 

2,716

 

290

 

4,335

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended April 30, 2006

 

2,483

 

1,563

 

2,137

 

1,909

 

 

Other Receivables Reserve

 

Period

 

Balance at
Beginning of
Year

 

Charged to
Costs and
Expenses

 

Deductions from
Reserves

 

Balance at End
of Year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended April 27, 2008

 

$

3,194

 

$

 

$

 

$

3,194

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended April 29, 2007

 

2,345

 

1,000

 

151

 

3,194

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended April 30, 2006

 

2,345

 

 

 

2,345

 

 

74



 

ITEM 9.      CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

 

None.

 

ITEM 9A.                      CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures - Based on their evaluation as of April 27, 2008, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were sufficiently effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in this Report was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and instructions for Form 10-K.

 

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting - Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of April 27, 2008. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Our management has concluded that, as of April 27, 2008, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on these criteria. Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, who audited and reported on the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as stated in their report which is included in Item 8.

 

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting - There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended April 27, 2008 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial reporting, other than the remediation of the material weakness discussed below.

 

Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls - Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected.

 

Remediation of Material Weakness - As disclosed in our fiscal 2007 third quarter report on Form 10-Q/A as of January 28, 2007, we identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related to controls over the accounting for leases. A material weakness is a significant deficiency or combination of significant deficiencies that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected. We have remediated the material weakness for lease accounting during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2008 by engaging a third party professional services firm to review all of our leases and to verify we are recording leases in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, based on lease terms. In addition, we have implemented a revised Summary of Procedures for lease accounting. These updated procedures state the technical guidance on accounting for leases and instituted a multi-level review control for new leases at the property level and at the corporate office.

 

75



 

ITEM 9B.                               OTHER INFORMATION

 

None.

 

PART III

 

ITEM 10.                                 DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

This item has been omitted from this report and is incorporated by reference to Isle of Capri’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report.

 

ITEM 11.                                 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

This item has been omitted from this report and is incorporated by reference to Isle of Capri’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report.

 

ITEM  12.                               SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

 

This item has been omitted from this report and is incorporated by reference to Isle of Capri’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report.

 

ITEM 13.                                 CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

 

This item has been omitted from this report and is incorporated by reference to Isle of Capri’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report.

 

ITEM 14.                                 PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

 

This item has been omitted from this report and is incorporated by reference to Isle of Capri’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report.

 

PART IV

 

ITEM 15.                                 EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

 

The following documents are filed as part of this Form 10-K.

 

(a)      Consolidated financial statements filed as part of this report are listed under Part II, Item 8.

 

(b)      The exhibits listed on the “Index to Exhibits” are filed with this report or incorporated by reference as set forth below.

 

All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or not required, or because the required information is included in the consolidated financial statement or notes thereto.

 

76



 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

ISLE OF CAPRI CASINOS, INC.

 

 

Dated: July 10, 2008

By:

/s/    James B. Perry

 

 

         James B. Perry,

 

 

Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice Chairman and Director

 

77



 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Dated: July 10, 2008

/s/  James B. Perry

 

James B. Perry,
Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice Chairman of the Board and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

Dated: July 10, 2008

/s/    Dale R. Black

 

Dale R. Black,
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

 

 

Dated: July 10, 2008

*    B ERNARD GOLDSTEIN

 

Bernard Goldstein,
Chairman of the Board and Director

 

 

Dated: July 10, 2008

*    R OBERT S. GOLDSTEIN

 

Robert S. Goldstein,
Vice Chairman of the Board and Director

 

 

Dated: July 10, 2008

*    A LAN J. GLAZER

 

Alan J. Glazer, Director

 

 

Dated: July 10, 2008

*    L EE WIELANSKY

 

Lee Wielansky, Director

 

 

Dated: July 10, 2008

*     W. Randolph Baker

 

W. Randolph Baker, Director

 

 

Dated: July 10, 2008

*    J EFFREY D. GOLDSTEIN

 

Jeffrey D. Goldstein, Director

 

 

Dated: July 10, 2008

*    J OHN BRACKENBURY

 

John Brackenbury, Director

 

 

Dated: July 10, 2008

*    S HAUN R. HAYES

 

Shaun R. Hayes, Director

 

* Dale R. Black, by signing his name hereto, does sign this document on behalf of the above-named individuals, pursuant to the powers of attorney duly executed by such individuals, which have been filed as an exhibit to this Registration Statement.

 

Dated: July 10, 2008

/s/   Dale R. Black

 

Dale R. Black,

 

Attorney-in-Fact

 

78



 

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

 

EXHIBIT
NUMBER

 

DESCRIPTION

3.1A

 

Certificate of Incorporation of Casino America, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed September 3, 1993)

 

 

 

3.1B

 

Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Casino America, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement for the fiscal year ended April 26, 1998)

 

 

 

3.2A

 

By-laws of Casino America, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed September 3, 1993)

 

 

 

3.2B

 

Amendment to By-laws of Casino America, Inc., dated February 7, 1997 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on July 28, 1997)

 

 

 

4.1

 

Indenture, dated as of March 3, 2004, among Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc., the subsidiary guarantors named therein and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on May 12, 2004)

 

 

 

10.1†

 

Casino America, Inc. description of Employee Bonus Plan (Incorporated by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 1993)

 

 

 

10.2†

 

Director’s Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed June 30, 1994)

 

 

 

10.3†

 

Amended Casino America, Inc. 1993 Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement filed on August 25, 1997)

 

 

 

10.4†

 

Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. 2000 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement filed on August 15, 2000)

 

 

 

10.5†

 

Amended and Restated Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. 2000 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement filed on August 27, 2007)

 

 

 

10.6†

 

Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. Deferred Bonus Plan (Incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement filed on August 15, 2000)

 

 

 

10.7†

 

Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc.’s 1995 Deferred Compensation Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on March 1, 2005)

 

 

 

10.8†

 

Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc.’s 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on March 1, 2005)

 

 

 

10.9†

 

Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc.’s 2005 Non-employee Director Deferred Compensation Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the Quarterly Report Form 10-Q filed on March 1, 2005)

 

 

 

10.10†

 

Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. Master Retirement Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on July 6, 2005)

 

 

 

10.11†

 

Employment Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2002, between Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. and Allan B.Solomon (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on June 19, 2002)

 

 

 

10.12†

 

Employment Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2005, between Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. and Robert F. Griffin (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on March 1, 2005)

 

 

 

10.13†

 

Employment Agreement, dated January 13, 2006, between Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. and Donn R. Mitchell II (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 19, 2006).

 

 

 

10.14†

 

Consulting Agreement, dated as of March 23, 2006, by and between John G. Brackenbury and Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Current Report on From 8-K filed on March 29, 2006)

 

79



 

EXHIBIT
NUMBER

 

DESCRIPTION

10.15†

 

Employment Agreement, dated as of July 16, 2007, between Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. and Virginia McDowell (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 20, 2007)

 

 

 

10.16†

 

Employment Agreement dated as of December 3, 2007, between Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. and Dale R. Black (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 12, 2007)

 

 

 

10.17†

 

Employment Agreement, dated as of March 4, 2008, between Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. and James B. Perry (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 10, 2008)

 

 

 

10.18†*

 

Employment Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2008, between Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. and Edmund L. Quatmann, Jr.

 

 

 

10.19†*

 

Form Employment Agreement for Senior Vice Presidents of Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc.

 

 

 

10.20†*

 

Form Stock Option Award Agreement

 

 

 

10.21†

 

Consulting Agreement, dated as of March 23, 2006, between John G. Brackenbury and Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Current Report on From 8-K filed on March 29, 2006)

 

 

 

10.22

 

Credit Agreement, dated as of July 26, 2007 among Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc., the Lenders listed herein, Credit Suisse, Cayman Island Branch, as administrative agent, issuing bank and swing line lender, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, as lead arranger and bookrunner, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and CIBC World Markets Corp., as co-syndication agents and U.S. Bank, N.A. and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as co-documentation agents (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 31, 2007)

 

 

 

10.23

 

Security Agreement, dated as of July 26, 2007, among Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc., its material subsidiaries party thereto, and Credit Suisse, Cayman Islands Branch, as Administrative Agent for and representative of the financial institutions party to the Credit Agreement and any Hedge Providers (as defined therein) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 31, 2007)

 

 

 

10.24

 

Biloxi Waterfront Project Lease dated May 12, 1986 with Point Cadet Development Corporation (Biloxi) (Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 1992)

 

 

 

10.25

 

Addendum to Lease Agreement, dated August 1, 1992, between the City of Biloxi, Mississippi, Point Cadet Development Corporation (Biloxi) (Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 1992)

 

 

 

10.26

 

Second Addendum to Lease, dated April 9, 1994, by and between the City of Biloxi, Mississippi, Point Cadet Development Corporation, the Biloxi Port Commission and Riverboat Corporation of Mississippi (Biloxi) (Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 1994)

 

 

 

10.27

 

Third Addendum to Casino Lease, dated April 26, 1995, by and between the City of Biloxi, Mississippi, Point Cadet Development Corporation, the Biloxi Port Commission and Riverboat Corporation of Mississippi (Biloxi) (Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 1995)

 

 

 

10.28

 

Biloxi Waterfront Project Lease dated as of April 9, 1994 by and between the City of Biloxi, Mississippi and Riverboat Corporation of Mississippi (Biloxi) (Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 1994)

 

 

 

10.29

 

First Amendment to Biloxi Waterfront Project Lease (Hotel Lease), dated as of April 26, 1995, by and between Riverboat Corporation of Mississippi (Biloxi) (Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 1995)

 

 

 

10.30

 

Point Cadet Compromise and Settlement Agreement, dated August 15, 2002, by and between the Secretary of State of the State of Mississippi, the City of Biloxi, Mississippi, the Board of Trustees of State Institutions of Higher Learning and Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. and Riverboat Corporation of Mississippi (Biloxi) (Incorporated by reference to an Exhibit 10.29 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on July 30, 2007)

 

80



 

EXHIBIT
NUMBER

 

DESCRIPTION

10.31

 

Biloxi Waterfront Project Garage-Podium Lease and Easement dated as of August 15, 2002, by and between the Secretary of State of the State of Mississippi, the City of Biloxi, Mississippi, the Board of Trustees of State Institutions of Higher Learning and Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. and Riverboat Corporation of Mississippi (Biloxi) (Incorporated by reference to an Exhibit 10.30 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on July 30, 2007)

 

 

 

10.32

 

Amended and Restated Berth Rental Agreement dated May 12, 1992 between the Biloxi Port Commission and Riverboat Corporation of Mississippi (Biloxi) (Incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 1992)

 

 

 

10.33

 

Second Amendment to Berth Rental Agreement dated August 13, 1996, (ii) Third Amendment to Berth Rental Agreement dated December 14, 1999 and (iii) Letter Agreement to Berth Rental Agreement dated October 17, 2006 (Biloxi) (Incorporated by reference to an Exhibit 10.32 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on July 30, 2007)

10.34

 

Agreement on Casino Berth Tract dated as of August 15, 2002, State consented to dredging, wharfing and filling by Isle of areas to reconfigure Berth Tract to accommodate a larger gaming vessel (Biloxi) (Incorporated by reference to an Exhibit 10.33 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on July 30, 2007)

 

 

 

10.35

 

Amended and Restated Lease, dated as of April 19, 1999, among Port Resources, Inc. and CRU, Inc., as landlords and St. Charles Gaming Company, Inc., as tenant (St. Charles) (Incorporated by reference to an Exhibit 10.28 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on July 02, 1999)

 

 

 

10.36

 

Lease of property in Coahoma, Mississippi dated as of November 16, 1993 by and among Roger Allen Johnson, Jr., Charles Bryant Johnson and Magnolia Lady, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-4/A filed June 19, 2002)

 

 

 

10.37

 

Addendum to Lease dated as of June 22, 1994 by and among Roger Allen Johnson, Jr., Charles Bryant Johnson and Magnolia Lady, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to an Exhibit 10.46 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on July 28, 2000)

 

 

 

10.38

 

Second addendum to Lease dated as of October 17, 1995 by and among Roger Allen Johnson, Jr., Charles Bryant Johnson and Magnolia Lady, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to an Exhibit 10.47 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on July 28, 2000)

 

 

 

10.39*

 

Lease of premises at the Arena, Phoenix Way, Foleshill, Coventry dated February 7 th , 2007 by and among Arena Coventry Limited, Isle of Capri Casinos Limited and Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc.

 

 

 

10.40*

 

Master Lease between The City of Boonville, Missouri and IOC-Boonville, Inc. formally known as Davis Gaming Boonville, Inc. dated as of July 18, 1997.

 

 

 

10.41*

 

Amendment to Master Lease between The City of Boonville, Missouri and IOC-Boonville, Inc. formally known as Davis Gaming Boonville, Inc. dated as of April 19, 1999.

 

 

 

10.42*

 

Second Amendment to Master Lease between The City of Boonville, Missouri and IOC-Boonville, Inc. formerly known as Davis Gaming Boonville, Inc. dated as of September 17, 2001.

 

 

 

10.43*

 

Third Amendment to Master Lease between The City of Boonville, Missouri and IOC-Boonville, Inc. formerly known as Gold River’s Boonville Resort, Inc. and Davis Gaming Boonville, Inc. dated as of November 19, 2001.

 

 

 

10.44*

 

Assignment and Assumption Agreement (Lease Agreement) between Flamingo Hilton Riverboat Casino, LP, Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. and IOC-Kansas City, Inc. dated as of June 6, 2000.

 

 

 

10.45*

 

Lease and Agreement-Spring 1995 between Andrianakos Limited Liability Company and Isle of Capri Black Hawk, LLC. dated as of August 15, 1995

 

 

 

10.46*

 

Addendum to the Lease and Agreement-Spring 1995 between Andrianakos Limited Liability Company and Isle of Capri Black Hawk, LLC. dated as of April 4, 1996.

 

 

 

10.47*

 

Second Addendum to the Lease and Agreement-Spring 1995 between Andrianakos Limited Liability Company and Isle of Capri Black Hawk, LLC. dated as of March 21, 2003.

 

81



 

EXHIBIT
NUMBER

 

DESCRIPTION

10.48*

 

Third Addendum to the Lease and Agreement-Spring 1995 between Andrianakos Limited Liability Company and Isle of Capri Black Hawk, LLC. dated as of April 22, 2003.

 

 

 

10.49

 

Operator’s Contract dated August 11, 1994; as amended by: (i) Amendment to Operator’s Contract dated August 15, 1998; and (ii) Second Amendment to Operator’s Contract dated June 30, 2004 (Bettendorf) (Incorporated by reference to an Exhibit 10.38 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on July 30, 2007)

 

 

 

12.1*

 

Computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges

 

 

 

21.1*

 

Significant Subsidiaries of Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc.

 

 

 

23.1*

 

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP

 

 

 

24.1*

 

Powers of Attorney Directors

 

 

 

31.1*

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a—14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

 

 

31.2*

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a—14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

 

 

32.1*

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

 

 

 

32.2*

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

 

 

 

99.1*

 

Description of Governmental Regulation.

 


*                                   Filed herewith.

                                   Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

 

82


Exhibit 10.18

 

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

THIS EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Agreement”), which expressly includes and references non-competition, non-solicitation and confidentiality provisions, is signed this 1st day of July, 2008 (the “Agreement Date”), by and between Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc., a Delaware corporation and its subsidiary and affiliated companies (hereinafter referred to individually and collectively as the “Company”) and Edmund L. Quatmann, Jr. (“Employee”).  This Agreement supercedes any and all prior understandings and agreements between Employee and the Company.

 

WHEREAS, the Company desires to employ Employee, and Employee desires to perform services for, and be employed by, the Company.

 

WHEREAS, as a condition of Employee’s employment, the Company desires to receive from Employee covenants including, but not limited to, the following: (a) to refrain from carrying on or engaging in a business similar to that of the Company; (b) to refrain from soliciting Employees of the Company for employment elsewhere; and (c) to protect and maintain the confidentiality of the Company’s trade secrets and any proprietary information.

 

WHEREAS, the Company and Employee desire to set forth in writing the terms and conditions of their agreements and understandings with respect to Employee’s employment at Company, as well as these covenants, and the parties expressly acknowledge that these covenants are a condition of Employee’s employment.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and conditions set forth in this Agreement, the Company and Employee agree as follows:

 

1.                                        Employment Date This Agreement shall be effective upon the Employee’s commencement of providing services for the Company on the date hereof (the “Employment Date”).

 

2.                                        Employment .

 

(a)                                   Term .  The Company hereby employs Employee, and Employee accepts such employment and agrees to perform services for the Company for an initial period of one (1) year from and after the Employment Date (the “Initial Term”) and for successive one-year periods (the “Renewal Term(s)”), unless either: (i) the Company provides 90 days written notice prior to the expiration of the Initial Term or applicable Renewal Term, or (ii) the Agreement is terminated at an earlier date in accordance with Section 3 or Section 4 of this Agreement (the Initial Term and the Renewal Terms together referred to as the “Term of Employment”).

 

(b)                                  Service with Company From and after the Employment Date during the term of this Agreement, Employee shall serve as the Company’s Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, reporting directly to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.  During the Term of Employment, Employee agrees to perform reasonable employment duties as the Board of Directors of the Company shall assign to him from time to time, with such duties and responsibilities as are customarily the duties and responsibilities of a Senior Vice President,

 



 

General Counsel and Secretary of companies such as the Company.  Employee also agrees to serve, for any period for which he is elected, as an officer of the Company; provided, however, that Employee shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for serving as an officer of the Company.  Employee’s office will be located at the Company’s corporate headquarters.

 

(c)                                   Performance of Duties .  Employee agrees to serve the Company faithfully and to the best of his ability and to devote substantially all of his business time, attention and efforts to the business and affairs of the Company during the Term of Employment.  The foregoing shall not preclude Employee from serving on charitable boards and engaging in other civic endeavors, so long as the same do not interfere with the performance of his duties.

 

(d)                                  Compensation .  From and after the Employment Date and during the remaining Term of Employment, the Company shall pay to Employee as compensation for services to be rendered hereunder an aggregate base salary of $365,000.00 per year payable in equal monthly, or more frequent, payments, subject to increases, if any, as may be determined by the Company (“Annual Base Salary”).  Employee shall also be eligible to receive an annual cash bonus beginning with respect to the Company’s 2009 fiscal year (prorated based on days of employment) based upon the achievement of objective performance targets that have been established by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”), provided that the Employee’s minimum annual bonus for each year shall be equal to at least 60% of the Employee’s Annual Base Salary if the Employee meets the minimum targets set by the Committee.  With respect to fiscal years subsequent to the 2009 fiscal year, Employee shall be involved as a senior management executive in the establishment of objective performance targets.  On the Agreement Date, the Employee shall receive a nonqualified option to purchase 110,000 shares of Company stock, subject to the terms of the Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. 2000 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan and the terms set forth in this Agreement, 20% of which options shall vest on each of the first five (5) anniversaries of the Agreement Date.  The exercise price of such options shall be $4.62 per share, representing the average between the high and low trading prices of the Company’s common stock on the date hereof which is equal to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.  The Employee shall also be entitled to participate in the Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. 2000 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan and other stock option plans, if any, established by the Company (the “Company’s Stock Option Plans”), to the extent that similarly situated executives of the Company participate in such plans.  In addition to the base salary, any bonuses, and participation in the Company’s Stock Option Plans as set forth above, Employee shall be entitled to participate in any employee benefit plans or programs of the Company as are or may be made generally available to employees of the Company and those made available to officers of the Company (it being understood that Employee shall first be eligible for the grant of additional stock options at the 2009 annual meeting of the Board of Directors).  Employee shall be entitled to three weeks’ vacation per year.  The Company will pay or reimburse Employee for all reasonable and necessary out-of-pocket expenses incurred by him in the performance of his duties under this Agreement, subject to the presentment of appropriate vouchers in accordance with the Company’s policies for expense verification.

 

(e)                                   No Violation .  Employee represents and warrants to the Company that the execution and delivery of this Agreement by Employee, and the carrying out of Employee’s

 

2



 

duties on behalf of the Company as contemplated hereby, do not violate or conflict with the terms of any other agreements to which the Employee is or was a party.

 

(f)                                     Relocation Expense Reimbursement .  The Company agrees to directly pay, or reimburse Employee for, all reasonable fees, costs and expenses incurred in connection with his relocation from Illinois to Missouri in a manner consistent with Company policies for senior, executive-level employees of the Company.

 

(g)                                  Signing Bonus .  The Company shall pay a signing bonus to Employee in the aggregate amount of $100,000.00, payable as follows: one-third to be paid on the Employment Date (or as soon thereafter as practicable); one-third to be paid on the first anniversary of the Employment Date (or as soon thereafter as practicable); and one-third to be paid on the second anniversary of the Employment Date (or as soon thereafter as practicable).  No portion of the signing bonus shall be payable if, on the scheduled date of payment thereof, Employee is not then employed by the Company for any reason.

 

3.                                        Termination .

 

(a)                                   The Term of Employment shall terminate prior to its expiration in the event that at any time during such term:

 

(i)                                      the Company delivers a notice of termination for “cause” to Employee.  For purposes of this Section, “cause” shall mean any dishonesty, disloyalty or breach of corporate policies, in each case that is material to the ability of Employee to continue to function as an effective executive given the strict regulatory standards of the industry in which the Company does business; gross misconduct on the part of Employee in the performance of Employee’s duties hereunder; a violation of Section 5 of this Agreement; or the failure to be licensed as a “key person” or similar role under the laws of any jurisdiction where the Company does business, or the loss of any such license for any reason.  If Employee is terminated for cause (after the Company has given him 10 days’ advance written notice in the case of instances giving rise to the Company’s ability to terminate Employee’s employment for “cause” that are capable of being cured during such time period), there shall be no severance paid to Employee and his benefits shall terminate, except as may be provided by law.

 

(ii)                                   the Company for any other reason terminates the Term of Employment, without “cause” as defined in this Section (including through non-renewal of the Agreement).  For purposes of this Section, if Employee signs a Mutual and General Release (a “Release”) in reasonable and typical form that is acceptable to the Company that releases the Company from any and all claims that Employee may have (and vice versa) and affirmatively agrees not to violate any of the provisions of Section 5 hereof (which shall not be expanded beyond what is set forth in Section 5), Employee shall be entitled to receive the severance payments and continued benefits

 

3



 

described in this paragraph 3(a)(ii); provided, if Employee fails to sign the Release, Employee shall not be entitled to any severance payments or benefits hereunder; and provided further, if any severance payments or benefits are subject to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), Employee shall only be entitled to any such severance payments or benefits if the Release has been executed, is effective and the applicable revocation period has expired no later than the date as of which such payment of the severance or benefits are otherwise to commence and if such requirements are not satisfied, Employee shall not be entitled to any such portion of the severance payments or benefits thereafter.  Subject to the foregoing, if the Company terminates the Term of Employment without “cause,” then the Employee shall be entitled to continue to receive his Annual Base Salary (and shall receive any earned but unpaid portion of his bonus) payable in 12 monthly installments beginning on the first day following the six-month anniversary of the Employee’s termination date and, to the extent legally permissible, Employee shall be entitled to continue to participate in the employee benefit programs for a period of 12 months from and after the Employee’s termination date; provided, however, that the salary continuation payments and such continued coverage under Company benefit programs shall end upon the Employee’s earlier employment by a new employer.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board of Directors may authorize that portion of the Annual Base Salary and earned but unpaid bonus payable in accordance with the foregoing provisions of this paragraph 3(a)(ii) that does not exceed an amount equal to two times the maximum amount that may be taken into account under a qualified plan pursuant to section 401(a)(17) of the Code for the year in which the Employee’s termination of employment occurs (the “409A Exempt Payment”) to be paid in a single lump sum to the Employee on the first payroll date following the Employee’s termination date; and the remaining Annual Base Salary and bonus (that is, the Annual Base Salary and bonus minus the 409A Exempt Payment paid to the Employee in single lump sum) to be paid to the Employee in 6 equal installments beginning on the six-month anniversary of the Employee’s termination date and ending on the one-year anniversary of the Employee’s termination date, or until new employment begins, whichever occurs first.  In the event of termination without “cause” pursuant to this Section 3(a)(ii), any unvested stock options owned by Employee on the date of termination that would have vested had Employee remained employed under this Agreement for one year following the date of termination, shall vest and become exercisable as of the date of termination.  As used in this Agreement, the term “earned but unpaid bonus” shall refer to the non-discretionary portion of the bonus to which Employee would have been entitled had he remained employed in his position for the remainder of the fiscal year of termination, prorated for the number of days during such year that Employee was employed by the Company.

 

4



 

(iii)           Employee for any reason voluntarily terminates the Term of Employment.  In said event, Employee shall not be entitled to any compensation and his benefits shall terminate, except as may be provided by law, from and after termination.

 

(iv)           However, if Employee voluntarily terminates the Term of Employment due to Retirement all stock options shall become fully vested and exercisable.  The term “Retirement” shall mean the termination by Employee of his employment by reason of reaching the age of 65 or such later date approved by the Board of Directors.

 

(v)            Employee dies or becomes “Disabled” (as defined below).  In said event,  Employee, or his estate, shall continue to receive his salary and shall receive any earned but unpaid bonus and, to the extent legally permissible, continue to participate in the employee benefit programs for a period of 12 months from and after such termination or until new employment begins, which ever occurs first. Employee shall also be entitled to a lump sum payment equal to the average of the last 3 years bonus payments inclusive of deferred amounts (or, if Employee has not been employed for three years, the average of the bonus payments, inclusive of deferred amounts, during the Term of Employment).  For purposes of this Agreement, “Disabled” means that the Employee is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months, as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors of the Company.

 

(b)                                  Except as provided hereunder, the vesting of stock options shall be governed by the provisions of the Company’s Stock Option Plans.

 

4.                                        Change In Control of the Company .  If (i) there is a sale, acquisition, merger, or buyout of the Company to an unaffiliated person, or any person that is not an “affiliate” (as such term is defined under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) of the Company or any of its shareholders on the Agreement Date becomes the legal and beneficial owner of more than 50% of the Company’s common stock  (a “Change in Control”), and (ii) immediately prior to or within 12 months after such Change in Control, the Employee voluntarily terminates employment under Section 3(a)(iii) in circumstances where there has been a significant reduction in the authority, responsibilities, position or compensation of Employee or Employee has been required to move the location of his principal residence a distance of more than 35 miles, and the Company has failed to remedy such situation within 30 days after receipt of Employee’s written notice thereof, then in lieu of the severance payments, if any, otherwise payable to the Employee under Section 3 of the Agreement, Employee will be entitled to the following severance:

 

(a)                                   Two times Annual Base Salary payable in 24 monthly installments beginning on the first day following the six-month anniversary of the Employee’s termination date; plus a lump sum payment equal to the amount of any earned but unpaid bonus plus the average of the previous 3 years bonus payment, inclusive of deferred amounts, if any (or, if

 

5



 

Employee has not been employed for three years, the average of the bonus payments, inclusive of deferred amounts, during the Term of Employment), which lump sum shall be paid to Employee on the first day following the six-month anniversary of the Employee’s termination date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board of Directors may authorize that portion of the foregoing payments under this paragraph 4(a) that qualify as a 409A Exempt Payment (as defined in section 3(a)(ii)) to be paid in a single lump sum to the Employee on the first payroll date following the Employee’s termination date; and the remaining Annual Base Salary amounts to be paid to the Employee in 24 equal installments beginning on the six-month anniversary of the Employee’s termination date and ending on the second anniversary of the Employee’s termination date, or until new employment begins, whichever occurs first; and the remaining bonus amount, if any, to be paid in a single lump sum on the six-month anniversary of the Employee’s termination date.  Salary continuation shall terminate if and when Employee begins new employment during the period of salary continuation.

 

(b)                                  Health and welfare benefits shall be fully paid by the Company and run concurrently with salary continuation (but if such continued health benefits are taxable to the Employee, then such continued health benefits shall continue only during the period during which the Employee would have been eligible to continue such coverage under the Company’s health plan in accordance with section 4980B of the Code (“COBRA”), had the Employee elected such coverage and paid the applicable premium), without any gap in coverage.

 

Upon the occurrence of a Change in Control, all stock options owned by Employee shall become fully vested and exercisable.  As a condition to receiving the payments described in clause (a) above, Employee shall be required to execute and deliver to the Company a general release in customary and agreed form, provided that if Employee fails to sign the release, Employee shall not be entitled to any severance payments or benefits under this Section 4; and provided further, if any severance payments or benefits are subject to Section 409A of the Code, Employee shall only be entitled to any such severance payments or benefits if such release has been executed, is effective and the applicable revocation period has expired no later than the date as of which such payment of the severance or benefits are otherwise to commence and if such requirements are not satisfied, Employee shall not be entitled to any such portion of the severance payments or benefits thereafter.

 

5.                                        Confidentiality, Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation .

 

(a)                                   The Company’s Business It is expressly agreed by the parties that the Company is engaged in the business of owning, managing and operating gaming and casino facilities in the states of Missouri, Mississippi, Iowa, Louisiana, Colorado, Florida, the United Kingdom and the Bahamas, is in the business of seeking new gaming properties in additional jurisdictions and is engaged in all aspects of such gaming and casino operations.  Employee desires to be employed by the Company and acknowledges and agrees that the Company would be adversely affected if Employee competes with the Company during, and subsequent to, Employee’s employment with the Company.

 

(b)                                  Trade Secrets and Confidential Information The Company and Employee acknowledge the existence of trade secrets and other confidential information as defined below (collectively referred to as “Confidential Information”), all of which are owned by the Company,

 

6



 

regardless of whether such Confidential Information was conceived, originated, devised or supplemented by Employee, the Company, or any other person or entity.  Employee acknowledges that he will have access to Confidential Information during his employment with the Company.

 

Except as required by law, during the term of this Agreement and thereafter, Employee shall not, without the prior written consent of the Company, directly or indirectly disclose or disseminate to any other person, firm or organization, any Confidential Information other than on behalf of the Company.  The foregoing obligation shall not apply to any Confidential Information that shall have become known to competitors of the Company or to the public other than through an act or omission by Employee or that shall have been disclosed to the Employee by a person or entity unaffiliated with the Company who has legitimate possession thereof in its entirety and possesses the unrestricted right to make such disclosure.  Employee agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Company from and against any damages (including attorneys’ fees, court costs, investigative costs and amounts paid in settlement) suffered by the Company or any of its Affiliates arising out of the unauthorized disclosure or use of Confidential Information by Employee.

 

“Confidential Information” shall mean any data or information and documentation, whether in tangible form, electronic form or verbally disclosed, that is of material value to the Company and not known to the public or the Company’s competitors, and which the Company has kept confidential.  To the fullest extent consistent with the foregoing and as otherwise lawful, Confidential Information shall include, without limitation, the Company’s trade secrets, computer programs, sales techniques and reports, formulas, data processes, methods, articles of manufacture, machines, apparatus, designs, compositions of matter, products, improvements, inventions, discoveries, developmental or experimental work, corporate strategy, marketing techniques, pricing lists and data and other pricing information, business plans, ideas and opportunities, accounting and financial information including financial statements and projections, personnel records, specialized customer information, proprietary agreements with vendors, special products and services the Company may offer or provide to its customers/guests from time to time, pending acquisitions, negotiations and transactions, or the terms of existing proposed business arrangements.  Confidential Information shall also include all customer lists, accounts and specifications, and contacts of the Company, and shall further include work in progress, plans or any other matter belonging to or relating to the technical or business activities of the Company.

 

Employee, at the time of the effective date of the termination of the employment relationship with the Company, shall turn over to the Company all “Confidential Information” and any and all copies thereof in his possession regardless of who provided Employee with such information.  Should Employee be legally served with a lawfully issued subpoena expressly directing Employee to turn over the Company’s Confidential Information, Employee shall immediately, and certainly no later than five (5) days after notice, advise the Company in writing of the subpoena and also provide a copy of the subpoena to the Company, at its lawful address as stated in this Agreement, thereby providing the Company with adequate time to lawfully object to the disclosure of its Confidential Information.  Employee’s failure to immediately advise the Company of the subpoena shall subject Employee to any and all remedies afforded to the

 

7



 

Company, including, but not limited to, damages resulting to the Company for breach of contract.

 

Employee agrees that all such Confidential Information is, and shall remain, the sole and exclusive property of the Company and Employee further agrees that during and after the term of his employment with the Company, Employee will not publish, disclose, communicate or otherwise disseminate to any entity and/or person any Confidential Information.  Employee acknowledges and agrees that such Confidential Information is of critical importance to the Company and its business, and any unauthorized dissemination of such information would cause great harm to the Company, thereby entitling the Company to any and all rights and remedies as provided by law, and as specifically provided in Section 6 of this Agreement.

 

Employee hereby assigns and agrees to assign to the Company any invention, improvement, or discovery made by him, alone or jointly with others, during the term of his employment, including any period of authorized leave of absence, or as a result of his employment, and which in any way relates to, or may be useful in, the business of the Company, together with each patent that may be obtained thereon in any country.  Employee will promptly and fully disclose to the Company any such invention, improvement or discovery and, without further consideration, will upon request by the Company execute all proper papers for use in applying for, obtaining and maintaining any United States or foreign patent and all proper assignments thereof, at the Company’s expense and through its Patent Counsel.  Each such invention, improvement or discovery, whether or not patented, shall be the exclusive property of the Company.

 

(c)                                   Restrictions on Competition .  In exchange for consideration of employment, and in consideration for Employee receiving and being given access to confidential business information, including, but not limited to trade secrets, customer and supplier contacts and relationships, goodwill, loyalty and other information, and as a condition of employment of Employee by the Company, during the term of Employee’s employment with the Company, and for a period of one (1) year after the voluntary or involuntary termination of Employee’s employment with the Company for any reason whatsoever (other than the termination of Employee’s employment by the Company other than for “cause” as set forth in Section 3(a)(ii) above), Employee will (a) refrain from carrying on or engaging in the casino or gaming business (as defined in Section 5(a)), or, without the written consent of the Company (which shall not be unreasonably withheld), the hotel or restaurant business, in any case either directly or indirectly, either individually or jointly or on behalf of or in concert with any other person, as a proprietor, partner, shareholder, investor (other than in less than 5% of any class of securities of any publicly traded company), lender, financial backer, director, officer, employee, agent, advisor, consultant or manager, or in any other capacity or manner whatsoever, (b) refrain from soliciting Employees of the Company, and (c) protect and maintain the confidentiality of trade secrets and any and all confidential and proprietary information.  Provisions (a) through (c) of this section apply to any gaming operation or gaming facility within a 75-mile radius of (A) any gaming operation or gaming facility owned (in whole or in part) by the Company or with respect to which the Company renders or proposes to render consulting or management services, in each case on the date hereof or on the date of termination of employment, or (B) any of the foregoing as to which the Company has taken any substantive step toward owning (in whole or in part) or managing such facility in the future.

 

8



 

(d)                                  Non-Solicitation of Employees .  In exchange for consideration of employment, and in consideration for Employee receiving and being given access to confidential business information, including, but not limited to trade secrets, customer and supplier contacts and relationships, goodwill, loyalty and other information, and as a condition of employment of Employee by the Company, during the term of Employee’s employment with the Company, Employee shall not, without the prior written consent of the Company, either directly or indirectly, either individually or jointly or on behalf of or in concert with any other person, as a proprietor, partner, shareholder, investor (other than in less than 5% of any class of securities of any publicly traded company), lender, financial backer, director, officer, employee, agent, advisor, consultant or manager, or in any other capacity or manner whatsoever, solicit for hire, enter into any contract or other arrangement with, or interfere with, disrupt or attempt to interfere with or disrupt the Company’s relationships with, any person, who, as of the date of termination of Employee’s employment, is employed by the Company.  This provision will apply in the geographic areas covered in Section 5(c), and with respect to any sales office, regional office or the corporate headquarters of the Company, for one (1) year after the voluntary or involuntary termination of Employee’s employment with the Company for any reason.

 

(e)                                   Reasonable Terms .  Employee agrees that the geographic areas, duration and scope of activities outlined in this Agreement are reasonable under the circumstances.  Employee further agrees that such terms are no broader than necessary to protect the Company’s business and maintain the confidentiality of the Confidential Information.  Employee further agrees that the terms of this Agreement are not oppressive and will not impose an unreasonable burden or restraint on Employee.

 

6.                                        Miscellaneous .

 

(a)                                   Successors and Assigns .  This Agreement is binding on and inures to the benefit of the Company’s successors and assigns.  The Company may assign this Agreement in connection with a merger, consolidation, assignment, sale or other disposition of substantially all of its assets or business (subject to the provisions of Section 4).  This Agreement may not be assigned by Employee.

 

(b)                                  Modification, Waivers .  This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a writing signed by an authorized representative of the Company, and Employee.  The Company’s failure, or delay in exercising any right, or partial exercise of any right, will not waive any provision of this Agreement or preclude the Company from otherwise or further exercising any rights or remedies hereunder, or any other rights or remedies granted by any law or any related document.

 

(c)                                   Governing Law, Arbitration .  The laws of Missouri will govern the validity, construction, and performance of this Agreement without regard to the location of execution or performance of this Agreement.  Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement, or the breach thereof, shall be settled by binding arbitration administered by the American Arbitration Association under its Commercial Arbitration Rules, and judgment on the award rendered by the arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof.  Both the Company and Employee hereby consent to this binding arbitration provision.

 

9



 

(d)                                  Remedies .  Employee expressly acknowledges and the parties recognize that the restrictions contained herein are reasonable and necessary to protect the business and interests of the Company, and that any violation of these restrictions will cause substantial irreparable injury and damage to the Company, and the extent of such damage would be difficult if not impossible to calculate.  Accordingly, the parties to this Agreement expressly agree that (i) if Employee breaches any provision of this Agreement, the damage to the Company may be substantial, although difficult to ascertain, and monetary damages may not afford an adequate remedy, and (ii) if Employee is in breach of any provision of this Agreement, or threatens a breach of this Agreement, the Company shall be entitled, in addition to all other rights and remedies as may be provided by law, to seek specific performance and injunctive and other equitable relief, including, but not limited to, restraining orders and preliminary and permanent injunctions, to enforce the provisions of this Agreement, particularly those provisions governing noncompetition, nonsolicitation and confidentiality, contained in this Agreement, as well as to prevent or restrain a breach of any provisions of this Agreement.  The parties expressly agree that the Company has these specific and express rights to injunctive relief without posting any bond that might be requested or required, and without the necessity of proving irreparable injury, and that Employee expressly agrees not to claim in any such equitable proceedings that a remedy at law is available to the Company.  The existence of any claim or cause of action by Employee, whether predicated on this Agreement or otherwise, shall not constitute a defense to the enforcement by the Company or any of its Affiliates of any provision hereof.  The parties to this Agreement also expressly agree that the Company is entitled to recover any and all damages for any losses sustained, and rights of which it has been deprived, as well as any damages allowed by law.

 

(e)                                   If any proceeding is brought for the enforcement of this Agreement, or because of an alleged dispute, breach or default in connection with any of the provisions of this Agreement, the successful or prevailing party or parties shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorney’s fees and other costs incurred in that proceeding, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled.  All of the Company’s remedies for breach of this Agreement shall be cumulative and the pursuit of one remedy shall not be deemed to exclude any other remedies.

 

(f)                                     Captions .  The headings in this Agreement are for convenience only and do not affect the interpretation of this Agreement.

 

(g)                                  Severability .  To the extent any provision of this Agreement shall be invalid or enforceable with respect to Employee, it shall be considered deleted herefrom with respect to Employee and the remainder of such provision and this Agreement shall be unaffected and shall continue in full force and effect.  In furtherance to and not in limitation of the foregoing, should the duration or geographical extent of, or business activities covered by, any provision of this Agreement be in excess of that which is valid and enforceable under applicable law with respect to Employee, then such provision shall be construed to cover only that duration, extent or activities which are validly and enforceably covered with respect to Employee.  Employee acknowledges the uncertainty of the law in this respect and expressly stipulates that this Agreement be given the construction which renders its provisions valid and enforceable to the maximum extent (not exceeding its expressed terms) possible under applicable laws.

 

10



 

(h)                                  Entire Agreement .  This Agreement contains the entire agreement and understanding by and between the Company and Employee, and supersedes all previous and contemporaneous oral negotiations, commitments, writings and understandings between the parties concerning the matters herein or therein, including without limitation, any policy of personnel manuals of the Company to the extent any provisions herein are inconsistent therewith.  No change to this Agreement shall be valid or binding unless it is in writing and signed by the parties.

 

(i)                                      Indemnification .  The Company shall indemnify Employee and hold Employee harmless to the full extent permitted by Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law from and against any and all claims, liabilities and losses he may suffer arising in connection with his employment as an officer of the Company as set forth herein, subject to the exceptions set forth in the Delaware General Corporation Law.  The agreement of the Company set forth in this Section 6(i) shall survive the termination of this Agreement.

 

(j)                                      Notices .  All notices and other communications required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing and sent by registered first-class mail, postage prepaid, and shall be deemed delivered upon hand delivery or upon mailing (postage prepaid and by registered or certified mail) to the following address:

 

If to the Company, to:

 

Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc.
600 Emerson Road
Suite 300
St. Louis, MO 63141

 

Attention:  President and CEO

 

With a copy to:

 

Paul Theiss
Mayer Brown LLP
71 S. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL  60606

 

If to the Employee, to:

 

Edmund L. Quatmann, Jr.
c/o Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc.

600 Emerson Road
Suite 300
St. Louis, MO 63141

 

With a copy to:

 

11



 

The most recent home address in the Company’s files for Edmund L. Quatmann, Jr.

 

These addresses may be changed at any time by like notice.

 

(k)                                   Independent Review and Advice .  Employee represents and warrants that Employee has carefully read this Agreement; that Employee executes this Agreement with full knowledge of the contents of this Agreement, the legal consequences thereof, and any and all rights which each party may have with respect to each other; that Employee has had the opportunity to receive independent legal advice with respect to the matters set forth in this Agreement and with respect to the rights and asserted rights arising out of such matters, and that Employee is entering into this Agreement of the Employee’s own free will.  Employee expressly agrees that there are no expectations contrary to the Agreement and no usage of trade or regular practice in the industry shall be used to modify the Agreement.

 

12



 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each party has caused this Agreement to be executed in a manner appropriate for such party as of the date first above written.

 

 

ISLE OF CAPRI CASINOS, INC.

 

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ James B. Perry

 

 

 

 

 

EMPLOYEE

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Edmund L Quatmann Jr

 

EDMUND L. QUATMANN, JR.

 

13


Exhibit 10.19

 

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

THIS EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into by and between Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and   (“Employee”), and is intended to be effective as of the date set forth below.

 

1.                                        Employment and Term:

 

1.1                                  Position.  The Company and/or an affiliated employer of the Company shall employ and retain Employee as its   or in such other capacity or capacities as may be mutually agreed upon from time to time, and Employee agrees to be so employed, subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein.  Employee’s duties and responsibilities shall be those assigned to him or her by                   to whom Employee shall report.  Employee agrees to discharge such duties in a reasonable and customary manner.

 

1.2                                  Affiliated Employer.  Employee acknowledges that he or she may perform services for the benefit of or be employed by an affiliate of the Company.  Employee agrees that any reference to the Company herein shall be deemed to include any such affiliate and that, to the maximum extent permitted by law, the protections described in Section 5 hereof shall be deemed to apply to the Company, any such affiliate and any other affiliate of the Company.

 

1.3                                  Full Time and Attention.  Employee agrees that he or she will devote his or her full time and attention to the performance of his or her duties hereunder.  Employee will not, without the prior written consent of the Company be engaged, whether or not during normal business hours, in any other business or professional activity, whether or not such activity is pursued for gain, profit or other pecuniary advantage.

 

1.4                                  Term.  Employee’s employment shall commence as of              (the “Effective Date”) and shall continue for a series of successive one-year terms, unless earlier terminated as provided in Sections 3 or 4 hereof (the period during which Employee is employed hereunder referred to as the “Employment Term”).

 

2.                                        Compensation and Benefits:

 

As of the Effective Date, the Company shall pay to Employee the annual base compensation set forth on Exhibit A hereto (Employee’s “Base Compensation”) and such other bonus, equity incentive, fringe and employee benefits, as may be set forth on such exhibit, the terms of which are incorporated herein by this reference. Such benefits and amounts may be adjusted, from time to time, on Exhibit A hereto or may be evidenced by a separate plan, policy or program sponsored by the Company or in the form of an agreement by and between the Company and Employee.

 

3.                                        Termination and Nonrenewal:

 

3.1                                  Special Definition.  As used herein, the term “Basic Severance” shall mean the aggregate of the following amounts and benefits:

 

a.                                        The continuation of Employee’s annualized Base Compensation in effect as of the date on which his or her employment ceases (Employee’s “Termination Date”), which amount shall be divided and paid in equal installments during the

 



 

12-month period following such date, in accordance with the Company’s regular pay date practices;

 

b.                                       The bonus due under the Company’s Annual Incentive Plan or a successor thereto with respect to the Company’s most recently completed fiscal year, if any, to the extent that such bonus has not yet been paid as of Employee’s Termination Date, which amount shall be paid on the payment date generally applicable to such bonus; and

 

c.                                        A monthly amount equal to the Company’s portion of Employee’s premium or similar contribution required under the Company’s group medical plan as an active employee, such amount to be (i) based upon Employee’s level of enrollment in such plan as of his or her Termination Date, (ii) paid during the 12-month period following Employee’s Termination Date or until Employee’s coverage ceases in accordance with Section 4980B of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), if earlier, and (iii) contingent upon Employee’s timely election to continue his or her coverage under the Company’s group medical plan in accordance with Code Section 4980B.

 

3.2                                  Termination on Account of Death or Disability.  If Employee dies or becomes Disabled during the Employment Term, this Agreement and Employee’s employment hereunder shall terminate.   In such event, the Company shall pay or provide to Employee (or to his or her estate) (a) the amount of any accrued but unpaid Base Compensation, (b) Basic Severance, and (c) any other amount or benefit to which Employee may be entitled under a separate plan, policy or program maintained by the Company.  Employee shall be deemed “Disabled” hereunder if he or she is (a) unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity due to a medically-determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or to last for a continuous period of at least 12 months, or (b) receiving benefits under the Company’s separate long-term disability plan for a period of at least three months as a result of a medically-determinable physical or mental impairment. The Company shall certify whether Employee is Disabled as defined herein.

 

3.3                                  Termination on Account of Employee’s Voluntary Resignation.  Employee may terminate this Agreement and his or her employment hereunder, upon 30 days prior written notice to the Company or such shorter period as may be agreed upon by the parties hereto.  In such event, the Company shall pay to Employee the amount of his or her accrued but unpaid Base Compensation. No additional payments or benefits shall be due hereunder, except as may be required under a separate plan, policy or program maintained by the Company or as may be required by law to be provided.

 

If Employee voluntarily terminates this Agreement and his or her employment hereunder on or after the date on which he or she attains age 65 and completes three years of service with the Company, then notwithstanding any provision of any plan, policy, contract or arrangement to the contrary, he or she shall receive the following amounts and benefits, in addition to any amount or benefit payable under a separate plan, policy or program maintained by the Company:

 

a.                                        Any stock options then outstanding shall be fully vested and be and remain exercisable during the one-year period following such termination or such longer period expressly provided under the terms of Employee’s individual grant or award;

 



 

b.                                       The amount of any bonus due under the Company’s Annual Incentive Plan or a successor thereto with respect to the Company’s most recently completed fiscal year, if any, to the extent that such bonus has not yet been paid as of such date, which amount shall be paid in the form of a single-sum on the payment date generally applicable to such bonus;

 

c.                                        A monthly amount equal to the Company’s portion of Employee’s premium or similar contribution under the Company’s group medical plan, such amount to be (i) based upon Employee’s level of enrollment in the Company’s group medical plan as of his or her Termination Date, (ii) paid during the 12-month period following Employee’s Termination Date or until the date on which Employee’s continuation coverage ceases in accordance with Code Section 4980B, if earlier, and (iii) contingent upon Employee’s timely election to continue his or her coverage under the Company’s group medical plan in accordance with Code Section 4980B; and

 

d.                                       An amount equal to Employee’s average bonus paid under the Company’s Annual Incentive Plan or a successor thereto during the Company’s three most recently completed fiscal years, determined net of any deferral under the Deferred Bonus Plan, multiplied by a fraction (i) the numerator of which is the number of days of Employee’s service during the fiscal year in which Employee’s Termination Date occurs, and (ii) the denominator of which is 365.

 

3.4                                  Termination by the Company Without Cause.  The Company may terminate this Agreement and Employee’s employment hereunder at any time, without Cause (as defined below), with not less than 30 days prior written notice to Employee, unless a shorter period is agreed upon by the parties hereto.  In such event, the Company shall pay to Employee his or her accrued but unpaid Base Compensation, provide any benefits otherwise required by law to be provided, and pay any amount or benefit otherwise required under a separate plan, policy or program maintained by the Company.  In the event that Employee timely executes a general release in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Company, the Company shall further provide to Employee Basic Severance.

 

3.5                                  Company’s Termination for Cause.  The Company may terminate this Agreement and  Employee’s employment hereunder at any time for Cause.  In such event, the Company shall pay to Employee the amount of his or her accrued but unpaid Base Compensation.  No additional payments or benefits shall be due hereunder, except as may be required under a separate plan, policy or program maintained by the Company or as may be required by law to be provided.  For purposes of this Agreement, the term “Cause” shall mean that Employee has:

 

a.                                        Committed an intentional act of fraud, embezzlement or theft in the course of his or her employment or otherwise engaged in any intentional misconduct which is materially injurious to the Company’s financial condition or business reputation;

 

b.                                       Committed intentional damage to the property of the Company or committed intentional wrongful disclosure of Confidential Information (as defined below) which is materially injurious to the Company’s financial condition or business reputation;

 

c.                                        Been indicted for the commission of a felony or a crime involving moral turpitude;

 



 

d.              Willfully and substantially refused to perform the essential duties of his or her position, which has not been cured within 30 days following written notice by the Company;

 

e.              Committed a material breach of this Agreement, which has not been cured within 30 days following receipt of written notice of the breach from the Company;

 

f.               Intentionally, recklessly or negligently violated any material provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 or any of the rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission implementing any such provision; or

 

g.              Committed a material breach of the Company’s Code of Ethics.

 

No act or failure to act on the part of Employee will be deemed “intentional” if it was due primarily to an error in judgment or negligence, but will be deemed “intentional” only if done or omitted to be done by Employee not in good faith and without reasonable belief that his or her action or omission was in the best interest of the Company.  In connection with any termination for Cause hereunder, the Company shall provide to Employee written notice of the event or actions deemed to constitute such Cause.

 

4.                                        Change of Control:

 

4.1                                  Special Definitions.  As used herein, the term “Change of Control” shall have the meaning ascribed to it in the Company’s 2000 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, as the same may be amended, restated or otherwise replaced from time to time.

 

The term “Good Reason” shall mean that Employee has terminated his or her employment with the Company on account of:

 

a.                                        A material diminution in Employee’s duties and responsibilities;

 

b.                                       A material diminution in Employee’s Base Compensation; or

 

c.                                        A material relocation of the principal place at which Employee performs services hereunder, but in no event less than 25 miles from the then principal place at which Employee performs such services.

 

No event shall constitute “Good Reason” hereunder unless Employee provides written notice thereof to the Company not more than 90 days after the occurrence of such reason, the Company is afforded not less than a 30-day cure period following receipt of such notice, and Employee terminates his or her employment hereunder promptly following the end of such cure period.

 

4.2                                  Termination of Employment in Connection with Change of Control.  If the Company terminates Employee’s employment hereunder, other than on account of Cause, or Employee terminates his or her employment hereunder on account of Good Reason, either occurring within the 12-month period following the occurrence of a Change of Control, then in lieu of any benefit provided in Section 3 hereof, the Company shall pay or provide to or for the benefit of Employee:

 



 

a.                                        An amount equal to 200% of his or her annualized Base Compensation then in effect, which amount shall be paid in the form of a single-sum 30 days following Employee’s Termination Date or the first business day thereafter.

 

b.                                       The average of his or her annual bonus payable under the Company’s Annual Incentive Plan or a successor thereto, before any deferral under the Company’s Deferred Bonus Plan, during the Company’s three most recently completed fiscal years or such shorter period as Employee has been employed by the Company; such amount shall be paid in the form of a single-sum 30 days following Employee’s Termination Date or the first business day thereafter.

 

c.                                        The amount of any bonus due with respect to the Company’s most recently completed fiscal year, if any, to the extent that such bonus has not yet been paid as of such date, which amount shall be paid on the payment date generally applicable to such bonus.

 

d.                                       A monthly amount equal to the premium required to continue Employee’s coverage under the Company’s group medical plan during the 18-month period following Employee’s Termination Date, such amount to be (i) based upon Employee’s level of enrollment in the Company’s group medical plan as of the date of his or her Termination Date, and (ii) contingent upon Employee’s timely election to continue his or her coverage under the Company’s group medical plan in accordance with Code Section 4980B.

 

e.                                        Any stock options granted to Employee outstanding as of the occurrence of a Change of Control shall be deemed fully vested and be and remain exercisable during the one-year period following Employee’s Termination Date or such longer period that may be provided under Employee’s individual grants or awards, but in no event shall such options remain exercisable ten years after the date of their grant.

 

4.3                                  Excise Tax.  If the aggregate present value of all payments and benefits due to Employee under this Agreement and any other payment or benefit due from the Company or any successor thereto (the “Aggregate Payments”) would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Code Section 4999, such payments or benefits shall be reduced by the minimum amount necessary to result in no portion of the Aggregate Payments, so reduced, being subject to the excise tax under Code Section 4999.  The determination of whether a reduction is required hereunder shall be made by the Company’s registered independent public accounting firm and shall be binding upon the parties hereto.  To the extent practicable, Employee shall be entitled to select the payments or benefits subject to reduction hereunder.

 

5.                                       Business Protection:

 

5.1                                  Consideration.  Employee acknowledges that the execution of this Agreement and his or her access to Confidential Information (as defined herein) shall constitute adequate consideration for each of the limitations and restrictions set forth in this Section 5, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged.

 

5.2                                  Protection of Confidential Information .  The Company and Employee acknowledge the existence of Confidential Information, which is owned by the Company, regardless of whether such Confidential Information was conceived, originated, devised,

 



 

supplemented, discovered or developed by Employee, the Company, or any other person or entity.  Employee acknowledges that he or she will have access to Confidential Information during the Employment Term and agrees that all such Confidential Information is, and shall remain, the sole and exclusive property of the Company.  Except as required by law, during the Employment Term and at all times thereafter, Employee agrees that he or she shall not, without the prior written consent of the Company, directly or indirectly use, disclose or disseminate to any person or otherwise use any Confidential Information, other than on behalf of the Company.  If Employee is legally served with a lawfully issued subpoena directing Employee to disclose Confidential Information, Employee shall immediately, but no later than five days after receipt of such subpoena, provide written notice to the Company, including a copy thereof.

 

As used herein, the term “Confidential Information” shall mean, in addition to the Company’s trade secrets as defined under applicable law, any data or information and documentation, whether in tangible form, electronic form or verbally disclosed, that is valuable to the Company and not generally known to the public.  To the fullest extent consistent with the foregoing and applicable law, Confidential Information shall further include, without limitation, the Company’s computer programs, sales techniques and reports, formulas, data processes, methods, articles of manufacture, machines, apparatus, designs, compositions of matter, products, ideas, improvements, inventions, discoveries, developmental or experimental work, corporate strategy, marketing techniques, pricing lists and data and other pricing information, business plans, ideas and opportunities, accounting and financial information including financial statements and projections, personnel records, specialized customer information, proprietary agreement with vendors, supplier information, special products and services the Company may offer or provide to its customers/guests from time to time, pending acquisitions, negotiations and transactions, or the terms of existing proposed business arrangements.  Confidential Information shall also include all customer/guest lists, accounts and specifications, and contacts of the Company, and shall further include work in progress, plans or any other matter belonging to or relating to the technical or business activities of the Company.

 

5.3                                  Patents; Intellectual Property .  Employee hereby assigns and agrees to assign to the Company any invention, improvement, or discovery made by Employee, alone or jointly with others, during the Employment Term, including any period of authorized leave of absence, or as a result of his or her employment, and which in any way relates to, or may be useful in, the business of the Company, together with each patent that may be obtained thereon in any country.  Employee shall promptly and fully disclose to the Company any such invention, improvement or discovery and, without further consideration, will upon request by the Company execute all proper papers for use in applying for, obtaining and maintaining any United States or foreign patent and all proper assignments thereof, at the Company’s expense and through its patent counsel.  Each such invention, improvement or discovery, whether or not patented, shall be the exclusive property of the Company.

 

5.4                                  Noncompetition.  The parties agree that the Company is engaged in: (a) the business of owning, managing and operating gaming and casino facilities in the States of Missouri, Mississippi, Iowa, Louisiana, Colorado, Florida, the United Kingdom and the Bahamas, (b) seeking new gaming properties in additional jurisdictions, and (c) all aspects of such gaming and casino operations (collectively, the “Company’s Business”).  Employee acknowledges that the Company would be adversely affected if he or she competes with the Company, and, accordingly, Employee agrees that, during the Employment Term and the one-year period thereafter, Employee shall refrain from carrying on or engaging in a business similar to the Company’s Business, either individually or jointly or on behalf of or in concert with any other person, as a proprietor, partner, shareholder, investor, lender, financial backer, director, officer,

 



 

employee, agent, advisor, consultant or manager.  The provisions of this Section 5.4 shall apply to (a) any operation or facility located within a 75-mile radius of any gaming operation or gaming facility owned by the Company, whether in whole or in part, (b) any such operation or facility, which is not owned by the Company but with respect to which the Company renders or proposes to render consulting or management services, and (c) any of the foregoing as to which the Company has taken any substantive step toward owning, in whole or in part, or managing.  In each case, such determination shall be made as of the date hereof and Employee’s Termination Date.

 

5.5                                  Nonsolicitation.  During the Employment Term and the six-month period thereafter, Employee shall not, without the prior written consent of the Company, either directly or indirectly, whether individually or jointly or on behalf of or in concert with any other person, as a proprietor, partner, shareholder, investor, lender, financial backer, director, officer, employee, agent, advisor, consultant or manager, or in any other capacity or manner whatsoever, solicit, hire or attempt to hire, enter into any contract or other arrangement with, or interfere with, disrupt or attempt to interfere with or disrupt the Company’s relationships with any person who is employed by the Company.  This Section 5.5 shall be applied in the geographic areas described in Section 5.4 hereof and in any sales office, regional office or the corporate headquarters of the Company.

 

5.6                                  Reasonable Terms.   By execution below, Employee agrees that the geographic areas, duration and scope of activities outlined in this Section 5 are reasonable.  Employee further agrees that (a) such terms are no broader than necessary to protect the Company’s business, (b) such terms are necessary to protect and maintain the Company’s interest in Confidential Information with respect to which Employee has or shall have access, and (c) such terms are not oppressive and will not impose an unreasonable burden or restraint on Employee.

 

The Company agrees that the provisions of this Section 5 shall not be construed to prohibit the acquisition by Employee of less than 5% of any class of securities issued by a publicly traded company.

 

5.7                                  Return of Company’s Property.   Upon termination or expiration of this Agreement and the employment of Employee hereunder, for any reason, Employee or his or her estate shall promptly return to the Company all of the property of the Company, including, without limitation, access cards, keys and similar items, automobiles, equipment, computers, fax machines, portable telephones, printers, software, credit cards, manuals, customer lists, financial data, letters, notes, notebooks, reports and copies of any of the above and any Confidential Information that is in the possession or under the control of Employee, without regard to the form thereof.  Employee, or his or her estate, shall provide to the Company written certification that he or she has complied with the provisions of this Section 5.7 not later than fourteen days after his or her Termination Date or, in the event of Employee’s death or Disability, such later time as the parties may mutually agree.

 

5.8                                  Indemnification.   The Company shall indemnify and hold harmless Employee to the extent provided under the Company’s organizational documents, from time to time, whether during the Employment Term or after Employee’s Termination Date.

 

5.9                                  Survival.  Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, Employee and the Company acknowledge that the restrictions and limitations set forth in this Section 5 shall survive the termination of this Agreement and Employee’s employment hereunder for any reason.

 



 

6.                                        General:

 

6.1                                  Specified Employee Delay.   In the event the Company determines that Employee is a “specified employee” within the meaning of Code Section 409A as of his or her Termination Date, then, notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, the Company shall postpone until the first business day of the seventh calendar month following Employee’s Termination Date (the “Delayed Payment Date”) any payment or benefit hereunder which is deemed on account of Employee’s separation from service and not otherwise permitted to be paid or furnished in accordance with the provisions of Code Section 409A or the guidance promulgated thereunder.   Any payment made as of Employee’s Delayed Payment Date shall include the principal amount of all payments suspended between Employee’s Termination Date and such date.

 

6.2                                  Successors and Assigns.   This Agreement is binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the Company’s successors and assigns.  The Company may assign this Agreement in connection with a merger, consolidation, assignment, sale or other disposition of substantially all of its assets or business, without the consent of Employee.  This Agreement may not be assigned by Employee.

 

6.3                                  Modification and Waiver .  This Agreement may be amended by written agreement signed by the parties hereto.  The Company’s failure, or delay in exercising any right, or partial exercise of any right will not waive any provision of this Agreement or preclude the Company from otherwise or further exercising any rights or remedies hereunder, including any other rights or remedies granted by any law or any related document.

 

6.4                                  Governing Law.  This Agreement shall be governed by the internal laws of the State of Missouri, without regard to the conflicts of law provisions thereof.

 

6.5                                  Arbitration, Remedies and Attorneys’ Fees.  Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement, or the breach thereof, shall be settled by binding arbitration administered by the American Arbitration Association under its Commercial Arbitration Rules, and judgment on the award rendered by the arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof.  Both the Company and Employee hereby consent to this binding arbitration provision.

 

The parties agree that (a) if Employee breaches any provision of this Agreement, the damage to the Company may be substantial, although difficult to ascertain, and monetary damages may not afford an adequate remedy, and (b) notwithstanding the provisions of this Section 6.5, if Employee is in breach of any provision of this Agreement, or threatens a breach of this Agreement, the Company shall be entitled, in addition to all other rights and remedies as may be provided by law, to seek specific performance and injunctive and other equitable relief, including, but not limited to, restraining orders and preliminary and permanent injunctions, to enforce the provision of this Agreement.  The parties expressly agree that the Company has these specific and express rights to injunctive relief without posting bond, and without the necessity of proving irreparable injury, and that Employee expressly agrees not to claim in any such equitable proceedings that a remedy at law is available to the Company.  The existence of any claim or cause of action by Employee, whether predicated on this Agreement or otherwise, shall not constitute a defense to the enforcement by the Company or any of its Affiliates of any provision hereof.  The Company’s remedies for breach of this Agreement shall be cumulative and the pursuit of one remedy shall not be deemed to exclude any other remedies.  The parties hereto

 



 

expressly agree that the Company shall be entitled to recover damages for any loss sustained or right to which it has been deprived, including any damages provided by law.

 

If any proceeding is brought for the enforcement of this Agreement, or because of an alleged dispute, breach or default in connection with any of the provisions of this Agreement, the successful or prevailing party or parties shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys’ fees and other costs incurred in that proceeding, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled.

 

6.6                                  Severability and Reformation.   To the extent any provision of this Agreement shall be invalid or unenforceable, it shall be considered deleted and the remainder of such provision and this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.  In furtherance of the foregoing, should the duration or geographical extent of, or business activities covered by, any provision of this Agreement be in excess of that which is valid and enforceable under applicable law, such provision shall be construed to cover only the duration, extent or activities that is valid and enforceable.  Employee acknowledges the uncertainty of the law in this respect, and expressly stipulates that this Agreement is to be given the construction which renders its provisions valid and enforceable to the maximum extent permitted under applicable law.

 

6.7                                  Entire Agreement .  This Agreement contains the entire agreement and understanding by and between the parties and supersedes and replaces any previous and contemporaneous oral negotiations, commitments, writings and understandings concerning the matters herein.

 

6.8                                  Notices .  All notices and other communications required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing and sent by certified or first class mail, postage prepaid, and shall be deemed delivered upon hand delivery or upon mailing to the following address (or such other address as may be furnished by a party hereto):

 

If to the Company:

Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc.

600 Emerson Drive, Suite 300

St. Louis, MO  63141

Attn: Senior Vice President, Human Resources

 

If to the Employee:

Employee’s last address in Company’s personnel files

 

6.9                                  Employee’s Representation.   Employee represents and warrants to the Company that the execution and delivery of this Agreement and the performance of his or her duties and obligations hereunder shall not constitute a violation of any other agreement to which Employee is a party.

 

6.10                            Taxes.   The Company shall be entitled to withhold as a condition of any payment or benefit described herein, any Federal, state or local taxes required by law to be withheld.

 

6.11                            Review and Advice.   By execution below, Employee represents and warrants that he or she has read this Agreement and obtained independent advice concerning the terms and conditions thereof.  Employee voluntarily executes this Agreement with full knowledge of its terms and conditions and the rights and obligations of the parties set forth herein.

 



 

THIS EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, as of the dates set forth below, to be effective as provided above.

 

Employee:

 

Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc.:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date:

 

 

Date

 

 

 

NO:99842554.2

 



 

EXHIBIT A

COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS

 

The terms of this Exhibit A, as it may be amended from time to time, are intended to form a part of that certain employment agreement by and between Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. and its affiliates and the employee named below (the “Agreement”).

 

Name of Employee:

 

Date of this Exhibit:

 

Base Compensation:

 

Bonus Opportunity:

 


Exhibit 10.20

 

STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT

 

THIS AGREEMENT, entered into as of [Grant Date] (the “Grant Date”), by and between the participant signing this Agreement (the “Participant”) and Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. (the “Company”);

 

WITNESSETH THAT :

 

WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. 2000 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), which is incorporated into and forms a part of this Agreement, and the Participant has been selected by the committee administering the Plan (the “Committee”) to receive a Stock Option Award under the Plan;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED, by and between the Company and the Participant, as follows:

 

1.                                                                                        Terms of Award .  The terms of the Award are set forth in Schedule I.

 

2.                                                                                        Award and Exercise Price .  This Agreement specifies the terms of the option (the “Option”) granted to the Participant to purchase the number of Covered Shares at the Exercise Price per share as set forth in Schedule I.  The Option shall be an “incentive stock option” or a “nonqualified stock option” as designated in Schedule I.  In the event that the Option is designated as an “incentive stock option” in Schedule I, the Option is intended to constitute, and shall be treated as, an “incentive stock option” as that term is used in Code section 422.  To the extent that the aggregate fair market value (determined at the time of grant) of shares of Stock with respect to which incentive stock options are exercisable for the first time by the Participant during any calendar year under all plans of the Company and its Subsidiaries exceeds $100,000, the options or portions thereof which exceed such limit (according to the order in which they were granted) shall be treated as non-qualified stock options.  It should be understood that if the Option is designated as an “incentive stock option”, there is no assurance that the Option will, in fact, be treated as an incentive stock option.  In the event that the Option is designated as a “nonqualified stock option” in Schedule I, the Option is not intended to constitute, and shall not be treated as, an “incentive stock option” as that term is used in Code section 422.

 

3.                                                                                        Date of Exercise .  Subject to the limitations of this Agreement, the Option shall be exercisable as set forth on Schedule I.  An installment shall not become exercisable on the otherwise applicable Vesting Date if the Participant’s Date of Termination occurs on or before such Vesting Date.  Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this paragraph 3, the Option shall become exercisable with respect to all of the Covered Shares (to the extent it is not then otherwise exercisable) as follows:

 

(a)                                   The Option shall become fully exercisable upon the Participant’s Date of Termination, if the Participant’s Date of Termination occurs by reason of the Participant’s Death,  Disability or Retirement.

 

1



 

(b)                                  The Option shall become fully exercisable upon a Change in Control, if the Participant’s Date of Termination does not occur on or before the Change in Control.

 

The Option may be exercised on or after the Date of Termination only as to that portion of the Covered Shares as to which it was exercisable immediately prior to the Date of Termination, or as to which it became exercisable on the Date of Termination in accordance with this paragraph 3. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this paragraph 3, a reload option shall not become exercisable in accordance with this paragraph 3, and shall instead become exercisable in accordance with paragraph 6.

 

4.                                                                                        Expiration .  The Option shall not be exercisable after the Company’s close of business on the last business day that occurs prior to the Expiration Date.  The “Expiration Date” shall be earliest to occur of:

 

(a)                                   the ten-year anniversary of the Grant Date;

 

(b)                                  if the Participant’s Date of Termination occurs by reason of Death or Disability, the one-year anniversary of such Date of Termination; or

 

(c)                                   if the Participant’s Date of Termination occurs for reasons other than Death or Disability, the 90-day anniversary of such Date of Termination.

 

5.                                                                                        Method of Option Exercise .  Subject to the terms of this Agreement and the Plan, the Option may be exercised in whole or in part by filing a written notice with the Secretary of the Company at its corporate headquarters prior to the Company’s close of business on the last business day that occurs prior to the Expiration Date.  Such notice shall be as provided in Schedule II.  Except as otherwise provided by the Committee before the Option is exercised, all or a portion of the Exercise Price shall be paid by the Participant in accordance with the methods described in Schedule II.

 

6.                                                                                        Withholding .  All deliveries and distributions under this Agreement are subject to withholding of all applicable taxes.  At the election of the Participant, and subject to such rules and limitations as may be established by the Committee from time to time, such withholding obligations may be satisfied through the surrender of shares of Stock which the Participant already owns, or to which the Participant is otherwise entitled under the Plan.

 

7.                                                                                        Transferability .  The Option is not transferable other than as designated by the Participant by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, and during the Participant’s life, may be exercised only by the Participant.

 

8.                                                                                        Definitions .  For the purposes of this Agreement, the terms used in this Agreement shall be subject to the following:

 

(a)                                   Date of Termination .  The Participant’s “Date of Termination” shall be the first day occurring on or after the Grant Date on which the Participant is not employed by the Company or any Subsidiary, regardless of the reason for the termination of employment; provided that a termination of employment shall not be deemed to occur by reason of a transfer of the Participant between the Company and a Subsidiary or between two Subsidiaries; and

 

2



 

further provided that the Participant’s employment shall not be considered terminated while the Participant is on a leave of absence from the Company or a Subsidiary approved by the Participant’s employer.  If, as a result of a sale or other transaction, the Participant’s employer ceases to be a Subsidiary (and the Participant’s employer is or becomes an entity that is separate from the Company), the occurrence of such transaction shall be treated as the Participant’s Date of Termination caused by the Participant being discharged by the employer.

 

(b)                                  Disability .  Except as otherwise provided by the Committee, the Participant shall be considered to have a “Disability” during the period in which the Participant is unable, by reason of a medically determinable physical or mental impairment, to engage in any substantial gainful activity, which condition, in the opinion of a physician selected by the Committee, is expected to have a duration of not less than 120 days.

 

(c)                                   Retirement .  The term “Retirement” shall mean the termination by a Participant of his employment by reason of reaching the age of 65 or such later date approved by the Board of Directors of the Company.

 

9.                                                                                        Heirs and Successors .  This Agreement shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the Company and its successors and assigns, and upon any person acquiring, whether by merger, consolidation, purchase of assets or otherwise, all or substantially all of the Company’s assets and business.  If any rights exercisable by the Participant or benefits deliverable to the Participant under this Agreement have not been exercised or delivered, respectively, at the time of the Participant’s death, such rights shall be exercisable by the Designated Beneficiary, and such benefits shall be delivered to the Designated Beneficiary, in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement and the Plan.  The “Designated Beneficiary” shall be the beneficiary or beneficiaries designated by the Participant in writing filed with the Committee in such form and at such time as the Committee shall require.  If a deceased Participant fails to designate a beneficiary, or if the Designated Beneficiary does not survive the Participant, any rights that would have been exercisable by the Participant and any benefits distributable to the Participant shall be exercised by or distributed to the legal representative of the estate of the Participant.  If a deceased Participant designates a beneficiary and the Designated Beneficiary survives the Participant but dies before the Designated Beneficiary’s exercise of all rights under this Agreement or before the complete distribution of benefits to the Designated Beneficiary under this Agreement, then any rights that would have been exercisable by the Designated Beneficiary shall be exercised by the legal representative of the estate of the Designated Beneficiary, and any benefits distributable to the Designated Beneficiary shall be distributed to the legal representative of the estate of the Designated Beneficiary.

 

10.                                                                                  Administration .  The authority to manage and control the operation and administration of this Agreement shall be vested in the Committee, and the Committee shall have all powers with respect to this Agreement as it has with respect to the Plan.  Any interpretation of the Agreement by the Committee and any decision made by it with respect to the Agreement is final and binding on all persons.

 

11.                                                                                  Plan Governs .  Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, the terms of this Agreement shall be subject to the terms of the Plan, a copy of which may be obtained by the Participant from the office of the Secretary of the Company; and this Agreement

 

3



 

is subject to all interpretations, amendments, rules and regulations promulgated by the Committee from time to time pursuant to the Plan.

 

12.                                                                                  Not An Employment Contract .  The Option will not confer on the Participant any right with respect to continuance of employment or other service with the Company or any Subsidiary, nor will it interfere in any way with any right the Company or any Subsidiary would otherwise have to terminate or modify the terms of such Participant’s employment or other service at any time.

 

13.                                                                                  Notices .  Any written notices provided for in this Agreement or the Plan shall be in writing and shall be deemed sufficiently given if either hand delivered or if sent by fax or overnight courier, or by postage paid first class mail.  Notices sent by mail shall be deemed received three business days after mailing but in no event later than the date of actual receipt.  Notices shall be directed, if to the Participant, at the Participant’s address indicated by the Company’s records, or if to the Company, at the Company’s principal executive office.

 

14.                                                                                  Fractional Shares .  In lieu of issuing a fraction of a share upon any exercise of the Option, resulting from an adjustment of the Option pursuant to paragraph 4.2(f) of the Plan or otherwise, the Company will be entitled to pay to the Participant an amount equal to the fair market value of such fractional share.

 

15.                                                                                  No Rights As Stockholder .  The Participant shall not have any rights of a stockholder with respect to the shares subject to the Option, until a stock certificate has been duly issued following exercise of the Option as provided herein.

 

16.                                                                                  Amendment .  This Agreement may be amended by written agreement of the Participant and the Company, without the consent of any other person.

 

4



 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Participant has executed this Agreement, and the Company has caused these presents to be executed in its name and on its behalf, all as of the Grant Date.

 

 

Participant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc.

 

 

 

By:

 

 

Its: Senior Vice President, CFO, Treasurer,

 

and Assistant Secretary

 

5


Exhibit 10.39

 

 

 

DATED 7th February 2007 

 

 

 

ARENA COVENTRY LIMITED 

(1)

 

 

 

ISLE OF CAPRI CASINOS LIMITED 

(2)

 

 

 

and 

 

 

 

 

ISLE OF CAPRI CASINOS, INC. 

(3)

 


 

 

 

 

LEASE

 

 

of premises at the Arena, Phoenix Way, 

 

 

Foleshill, Coventry

 

 

 

 


 



 

CONTENTS

 

Clause

 

Heading

 

Page

 

 

 

 

1

 

Definitions, Interpretation and Miscellaneous Provisions

1

2

 

Demise and Rent

12

3

 

Tenant’s Covenants

12

4

 

Landlord’s Covenants

12

5

 

Re-Entry

12

6

 

Guarantor’s Covenants

14

7

 

Break Clause

14

8

 

Stamp Duty

15

Schedule 1

16

Schedule 2

17

Schedule 3

20

Schedule 4

22

Schedule 5

23

Schedule 6

28

Schedule 7

34

Schedule 8

48

Schedule 9

52

Schedule 10

62

Schedule 11

68

Schedule 12

71

Schedule 13

72

 



 

THIS LEASE made on 7th February 2007

 

BETWEEN:

 

(1)                                  ARENA COVENTRY LIMITED (Company No 04440684) whose registered office is at The Council House, Earl Street, Coventry CV1 5RR (“the Landlord ”)

 

(2)                                  ISLE OF CAPRI CASINOS LIMITED (Company No 04584366) whose registered office is at 30 Old Burlington Street, London, W1S 3NL (“the Tenant ”)

 

(3)                                  ISLE OF CAPRI CASINOS, INC. incorporated in the State of Delaware whose principal office is at 1641 Popps Ferry Road Biloxi Mississippi 39532 United States of America (“the Guarantor ”)

 

WITNESSES as follows:

 

1                                          Definitions, Interpretation and Miscellaneous Provisions

 

1.1                                 Definitions

 

(a)                                  “Adjoining Property” means any land or property adjoining the Estate in which the Landlord or a Group Company of the Landlord has (or during the Term acquires) a leasehold or a freehold interest;

 

(b)                                 “Authority” means any statutory public local or other authority or any court of law or any government department or any of them or any of their duly authorised officers;

 

(c)                                  “Balance of Parking Spaces” means all the parking spaces in the Car Park excluding the Minimum Spaces;

 

(d)                                 “Basic Rent” means up to (but excluding) the Rent Commencement Date a peppercorn if demanded and:

 

(i)                                    from and including the Rent Commencement Date to and including 24 December 2006 £393,427.00 per annum;

 

(ii)                                 from and including 25 December 2006 to and including 24 December 2007 £608,120.00 per annum;

 

(iii)                              from and including 25 December 2007 to and including 24 December 2010 £622,812.00 Per annum

 

(iv)                             as from time to time reviewed under schedule 5.

 

(e)                                  “Building” means the building on the Estate shown for the purpose of identification only edged orange purple and hatched blue on the Site Plan and every part of it comprising the Stadium and the Leisure and Exhibition Areas;

 

(f)                                    “Car Park” means the car parks at the Estate shown edged green on the Site Plan;

 

1



 

(g)                                 “Car Park Management Strategy” means the regulations made from time to time in accordance with this Lease in respect of the management and use of the Car Park (the regulations at the date, hereof being appended at Schedule 12);

 

(h)                                 “CDM Regulations” means the Construction and Design (Management) Regulations 1994;

 

(i)                                     “Club” means Coventry City Football Club Limited;

 

(j)                                     “Common Parts” means:

 

(i)                                     the Car Park, the Street, the Reception and the vehicular and pedestrian accesses shown edged brown on the Plan; and

 

(ii)                                  the Main Structure and Plant and any Service Media which is not within and exclusively serving a Lettable Area.

 

(k)                                  “Connected Person” means any person firm or company which is connected with the Tenant for the purposes of section 839 Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988;

 

(l)                                     “Consent” means an approval permission authority licence or other relevant form of approval given by the Landlord in writing;

 

(m)                               “Contamination” means the presence release spillage disposal emission or migration of any substances in on or under the Estate or emanating from the Estate which could reasonably cause harm to the Environment;

 

(n)                                 “Demised Premises” means the premises being that part of the Building (and in particular part of the Leisure and Exhibition Areas) more fully described in schedule 1 and all additions and improvements made to it and references to the Demised Premises shall include reference to any part of them;

 

(o)                                 “Demised Premises Plans” means the plans annexed to this Lease and marked Drawing No 03/17138 (20) - 01M Rev E, 17138 (20) - 1, Rev E, 03/17138 (20) 01 Rev E, 03/17138 (20) 00 Rev E and 17138 (20) 02 Rev D;

 

(p)                                 “Determination” means the end of the Term however that occurs

 

(q)                                 “Enactment” means:

 

(i)                                     any Act of Parliament and

 

(ii)                                  any European Community legislation or decree or other supranational legislation or decree having effect as law in the United Kingdom

 

and references (whether specific or general) to any Enactment include any statutory modification or re-enactment of it for the time being in force and any order instrument plan regulation permission or direction made or issued under it or under any Enactment replaced by it or deriving validity from it;

 

2



 

(r)                                    “Estate” means the Estate (including the Building thereon) and external areas known as Arena Coventry, Phoenix Way, Foleshill, Coventry shown edged blue on the Site Plan and every part of it and everything attached to it;

 

(s)                                  “Environment” means

 

(i)                                    land including without limitation surface land sub-surface strata sea bed and river bed under water (as defined in paragraph (ii)) and natural and man made structures;

 

(ii)                                 water including without limitation coastal and inland waters surface waters ground waters and water in drains and sewers;

 

(iii)                              air including without limitation air inside buildings and in other natural and man-made structures above or below ground; and

 

(iv)                             any and all living organisms or systems supported by those media including without limitation habitats protected under Environment Acts crops livestock and humans.

 

(t)                                    “Environment Acts” means the Environmental Protection Act 1990 the Environment Act 1995 Water Resources Act 1991 the Water Industry Act 1991 and any other legislation and statutory guidance in force at any time during the Term which has as its purpose or effect the prevention of harm to the Environment;

 

(u)                                 “Environmental Information” means:

 

(i)                                    the replies (dated 9 July 2003) to environmental enquiries raised by the Tenant (dated 18 February 2003)

 

(ii)                                 the replies (dated 10 July 2003) to additional environmental enquiries raised by the Tenant (dated 11 April 2003) and

 

(ii)                                 the following environmental report:

 

Environmental Risk Assessment of the Phase 1 Arena site prepared by QDS Environmental Limited for Tesco Stores Limited (QDS Project No. 99-164-03) and dated February 2003; with Appendices i – ix ;

 

(v)                                 “Environmental Insurance Policy” means:

 

(i)                                    the draft environmental insurance policy from Certa annexed hereto at Annexure 2 (treated for the purposes of paragraph 9 of Part III of Schedule 7 as if such policy is in force and effective) ( “Draft Environmental Policy” ); or where it exists;

 

(ii)                                 the environmental insurance policy which the Superior Landlord entitled to the reversion immediately expectant on the term granted by the Superior Lease dated 26 January 2006 subsequently enters into in respect of the Estate ( “the Final Environmental Policy” ) provided that the restrictions in relation to the use and occupation of

 

3



 

the Estate in the Final Environmental Policy are not materially different in their effect to those restrictions in the Draft Environmental Policy.

 

(w)                               “Existing Contaminated Land Liability” means any fines penalties charges actions losses costs claims expenses demands duties obligations and other liabilities (whether past present or future including under any Environment Acts) arising from Contamination first present in on or under or originating from the Estate prior to the Term;

 

(x)                                   “Gross Internal Area” means the gross internal area in square feet of any building (as built) measured in accordance with the Code of Measuring Practice published by the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors and the Incorporated Society of Valuers and Auctioneers (Fifth Edition published 1 February 2002);

 

(y)                                 “Group Company” means any company of which the Tenant or any undertenant or the Landlord (as the case may be) is a Subsidiary or which has the same Holding Company as the Tenant or any undertenant or the Landlord (as the case may be) where Subsidiary and Holding Company have the meanings given to them by section 736 Companies Act 1985;

 

(z)                                   “Guarantor” means the party named as such in this Lease (if any) or the person who is required to give a covenant to the Landlord as the assignee’s guarantor under paragraph 3 of Part IV of schedule 7 for so long as each of those persons remain bound by the covenants on their part;

 

(aa)                            “Hazardous Material” means any substance known or reasonably believed to be harmful to the Environment and regulated by the Environment Acts;

 

(bb)                          “Interest Rate” means three percent above the base lending rate from time to time of Lloyds TSB Bank Plc or such other bank being a member of the Committee of London and Scottish Bankers as the Landlord may from time to time nominate or if that base lending rate cannot be ascertained then three percent above such other rate as the Landlord may reasonably specify and where and whenever interest is payable at or by reference to the Interest Rate it shall be calculated on a daily basis;

 

(cc)                            “Landlord” includes the immediate reversioner to this Lease from time to time;

 

(dd)                          “Lease” means this lease and includes where relevant any deed of variation licence Consent or other document supplemental to or associated with this Lease;

 

(ee)                            “Legal Obligation” means any obligation from time to time created by any Enactment or Authority and includes without limitation obligations imposed by the Planning Acts or as a condition of any Necessary Consents;

 

(ff)                                “Leisure and Exhibition Areas” means the part of the Building comprising (inter alia) the casino and the exhibition halls and shown edged purple on the

 

4



 

Site Plan;

 

(gg)                          “Licence to Assign” means the document set out in schedule 10;

 

(hh)                          “Main Structure” means the foundation floor slabs floors load bearing walls columns beams steel frames and roofs of the Building (but not the floor screed or floor coverings plaster or wall coverings of the Demised Premises the Stadium or of any Lettable. Areas (as defined in Schedule 9)) and all Service Media (other than those situated in and exclusively serving the Demised Premises the Stadium and/or any Lettable Areas) and “structural” means anything appertaining to the Main Structure;

 

(ii)                                  “Major Event” means an event or function to be held at the Estate which is expected to attract more than 10,000 spectators or visitors per day;

 

(jj)                                  “Major Event Days” means up to 12 days in any year during the Term commencing on the Term Commencement Date and each anniversary thereof on which the Landlord and/or the Operator is holding a Major Event on the Estate and of which the Landlord has given to the Tenant not less than 10 Working Days prior written notice;

 

(kk)                            “Major Event Restricted Hours” means on Major Event Days from 00.01 to 24.00; .

 

(ll)                                  “Match Day Restricted Hours” means on Match Days the hours beginning 3 hours before the scheduled kick off of the football match taking place on any Match Day and ending 3 hours after the final whistle of the football match taking place on that Match Day;

 

(mm)                      “Match Days” means the days on which the Club is holding competitive football matches played by the first team at the Stadium;

 

(nn)                          “Minimum Spaces” means 1,000 parking spaces within the Car Park for the exclusive use by the Tenant and other occupiers of and visitors to the Demised Premises save:

 

(i)                                     during the Match Day Restricted Hours when the Minimum Spaces shall be the 100 parking spaces within that part of the Car Park shown hatched green on the Site Plan (all such spaces to be marked as for the exclusive use by the Tenant and other occupiers of and visitors to the Demised Premises); and

 

(ii)                                  during Major Event Restricted Hours when the Minimum Spaces shall be the said 100 parking spaces within that part of the Car Park shown hatched green on the Site Plan and 400 parking spaces as close as reasonably practicable to the Demised Premises (all such spaces to be for the exclusive use by the Tenant and other occupiers of and visitors to the Demised Premises)

 

(oo)                          “Necessary . Consents” means planning permission and all other consents licences permissions and approvals whether of a public or private nature which shall be relevant in the context;

 

5



 

(pp)                          “Operator” means the operator from time to time of the exhibition halls forming part of the Leisure and Exhibition Areas;

 

(qq)                          “Outgoings” means all rates taxes charges duties assessments impositions and outgoings of any sort which are at any time during the Term payable by the owner or occupier of property and includes charges for electricity gas water sewerage telecommunications (including meter rentals connection and hire charges) and other services rendered to or consumed by the relevant property but excludes tax payable by the Landlord on the receipt of the Basic Rent or on any dealings or deemed dealings with its reversion to this Lease and input VAT suffered by the Landlord in respect of the Demised Premises or the Building and the Estate;

 

(rr)                                “Permitted Use” means uses within class D2 of the Schedule to the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987 or for such other use as the Landlord may from time to time approve (such approval not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed);

 

(ss)                            “Plant” means the following apparatus plant machinery and equipment from time to time serving the Common Parts heating cooling public address and closed circuit television systems security systems burglar and fire alarm fire prevention or fire control building management systems but excluding Tenant’s Plant;

 

(tt)                                “Planning Acts” means every Enactment or regulation of any Authority from time to time in force in relation to the Town and Country Planning development control and the use of land or buildings;

 

(uu)                          “Payment Days” means 25th March 24th June 29th September and 25th December in each year;

 

(vv)                          “Reception” means the reception area within the Building shown coloured yellow on the Site Plan;

 

(ww)                      “Regulations” means the Regulations in paragraph 2 of Part III of schedule 7 and any others from time to time properly and reasonably made by the Landlord (for the common benefit of all occupiers of the Estate in accordance with the principles of good estate management varying the same or in addition to or in substitution for those regulations which the Landlord notifies to the Tenant in waiting) provided that:

 

in the event of there being any inconsistency between any such new or varied regulations and this Lease then the provisions of this Lease shall take precedence;

 

any such varied or new regulations shall not prejudice the Tenant’s beneficial use and occupation of the Demised Premises or the Rights

 

(xx)                             “Release” means any release spillage emission leaking pumping injection deposit disposal discharge leaching or migration into the Environment or into or out of any property including the movement of Hazardous Material through

 

6



 

the Environment;

 

(yy)                          “Rent” means all sums reserved as rent by this Lease;

 

(zz)                              Rent Commencement Date” means 1 August 2006;

 

(aaa)                      “Reservations” means the exceptions and reservations set out in schedule 3;

 

(bbb)                   “Rights” means the rights set out in schedule 2;

 

(ccc)                      “Section 106 Agreement” means the agreements brief details of which are set out in Part 3 of Schedule 4;

 

(ddd)                   “Service Media” means sewers drains pipes channels wires cables ducts watercourses culverts gutters fibres and any other medium for the passage or transmission of soil water gas electricity telecommunications air smoke light information or other matters and other supplies and includes where relevant ancillary equipment from time to time in or on the Estate or serving the Estate;

 

(eee)                      “Sign” includes any sign hoarding showcase signboard flag flagpole bill plate fascia poster or advertisement;

 

(fff)                            “Site Plan” means the plan annexed to this Lease and marked “Site Plan” ;

 

(ggg)                   “Stadium” means the part of the Building comprising the football stadium and shown edged orange on the Site Plan;

 

(hhh)                   “Station” means the railway station to be constructed on the land to the South East of the Estate;

 

(iii)                               “Street” means the part of the Building comprising the area separating the Stadium from the Leisure and Exhibition Areas and shown hatched blue on the Site Plan;

 

(jjj)                               “Superior Landlord” means any party having an interest in the Demised Premises in reversion to the Superior Lease;

 

(kkk)                      “Superior Lease” means the leases of the Estate (and adjoining land) or any part thereof brief details of which are set out in Part 2 of Schedule 4;

 

(lll)                               “Tenant” includes its successors in title;

 

(mmm)             “Tenant’s Plant” means any fitting out works and all plant machinery and equipment installed before on or after the date hereof other than at the cost of the Landlord;

 

(nnn)                   “Term” means the term of 25 years calculated from the Term Commencement Date and includes any extension holding over or continuation (but not renewal) of it whether by Enactment or agreement;

 

(ooo)                   “Term Commencement Date” means 25 December 2005;

 

7



 

(ppp)       “Title Matters” means the rights specified in Part 1 of Schedule 4;

 

(qqq)       “VAT” includes any future tax of a like nature and all references to an election by the Landlord to waive exemption under paragraph 2(1) of Schedule 10 to the Value Added Tax Act 1994 shall be deemed to include any such election made by a company in the same VAT group as the Landlord.

 

1.2            Interpretation

 

In this Lease:

 

(a)            words importing any gender include every gender

 

(b)            words importing the singular number only include the plural number and vice versa

 

(c)            words importing persons include firms companies and corporations and vice versa

 

(d)            references to numbered clauses and schedules are references to the relevant clause in or schedule to this Lease

 

(e)            reference in any schedule to numbered paragraphs are references to the numbered paragraphs of that schedule

 

(f)             where any obligation is undertaken by two or more persons jointly they shall be jointly and severally liable in respect of that obligation

 

(g)            any obligation on any party not to do or omit to do anything shall include an obligation not to allow that thing to be done or omitted to be done by any undertenant of that party of by any employee servant or agent of that party

 

(h)            where the Landlord covenants to do something it shall be deemed to fulfil that obligation if it procures that it is done

 

(i)             the headings to the clauses schedules and paragraphs and the contents of the lease particulars are provided for convenience only and shall not affect the interpretation of this Lease

 

(j)             any sum payable by one party to the other shall be exclusive of VAT which shall where it is chargeable be paid in addition to the sum in question at the time when the sum in question is due to be paid or if later (save in respect of the Basic Rent in respect of which valid VAT invoices shall be delivered before or promptly after the date upon which the Basic Rent is payable) when a valid VAT invoice addressed to the paying party is delivered to that party

 

(k)            any relevant perpetuity period shall be eighty years from the date of this Lease and shall apply to any rights granted or reserved over or in respect of anything which is not now in existence

 

(1)            any reference to a particular plan in this Lease shall be to the relevant named plan so annexed

 

8



 

 

(m)           any part of the Demised Premises that faces onto any of the Common Parts shall be regarded as an external part of the Demised Premises notwithstanding that such Common Parts may be covered in and “exterior” and “external” shall be construed accordingly

 

(n)            the rights of the Landlord to have access to the Demised Premises are subject to clause 1.3(c) and are to be construed as extending to the Superior Landlord and to all persons properly and reasonably authorised by them

 

(o)            any provisions of this Lease requiring the Tenant to obtain Consent are to be construed as also requiring (as a condition precedent) the consent or other approval of the Superior Landlord (where their consent or approval is required under any Superior Lease) and which shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed where the Landlord’s Consent cannot be unreasonably withheld or delayed

 

(p)            unless this Lease states otherwise all sums payable to the Landlord are due within 7 days of written demand

 

(q)            the expressions “Landlord’s fixtures” and “Landlord’s fixtures and fittings” do not include the Tenant’s Plant

 

(r)             the provisions of the Schedules apply to this Lease and expressions defined in the Schedules to this Lease shall have the meanings specified in those Schedules

 

1.3            In this Lease:

 

(a)                Landlord’s Liability

 

Except to the extent that the same are or pursuant to the covenants herein contained should be covered by any Insurance Policy (as defined in Schedule 6) (if applicable) and further except to the extent that the Landlord may be liable under its covenants in this Lease or by law notwithstanding any agreement to the contrary and subject to the Landlord taking all reasonable steps if possible to minimise any damage or interference caused and remedy any such matter as quickly as reasonably possible the Landlord shall not be liable to the Tenant or any undertenant or any servant agent licensee or invitee of them by reason of:

 

(i)             any act neglect default or omission of any third party not being a tenant or owner or occupier of the Estate or any Adjoining Property or of any representative or employee of the Landlord or

 

(ii)            the defective working stoppage or breakage of or leakage or overflow from any Service Media or Plant which is beyond the reasonable control of the Landlord

 

(iii)           the obstruction by any third party not being a tenant or owner or occupier of the Estate or of any Adjoining Property or any representative or employee of the Landlord or the Common Parts or the areas over which rights are granted by this Lease

 

(b)               Alterations

 

Subject and without prejudice to the provisions in Schedule 8 the Landlord shall be entitled to make vary and make alterations to the Building and the Estate (but not the

 

9



 

Demised Premises or the Common Parts) and to alter renew, or replace any Service Media or Plant which do not serve the Demised Premises but shall ensure that in doing so as little inconvenience or disturbance to the Tenant and any undertenant or other lawful occupier of the Demised Premises is caused as is reasonably practicable in the circumstances and that the use of the Demised Premises for the Permitted User and the exercise of the Rights granted by this Lease is not prevented prohibited or materially interfered with and that the Building and the Estate as so varied or altered are no less convenient or commodious to the Tenant and any undertenant or other lawful occupier of the Demised Premises than as at the date of this Lease

 

(c)            As to Exercise of Rights of Entry

 

Wherever in this lease it is provided that the Landlord and/or any other person authorised by the Landlord is entitled to enter on or into the Demised Premises the Landlord hereby covenants with the Tenant to procure that:

 

(i)             entry shall only be effected on such part of the Demised Premises as is reasonably necessary and only for such period as is reasonably necessary

 

(ii)            as little damage to the Demised Premises and to the Tenant’s Plant and the tenant’s fixtures and fittings as reasonably possible is caused by such entry

 

(iii)           any damage caused to the Demised Premises the Tenant’s Plant and the tenant’s fixtures and fittings by such entry shall be made good promptly to the Tenant’s reasonable satisfaction

 

(iv)           except in case of emergency before any such entry prior arrangement for such entry shall be made with the Tenant (which the Tenant shall not unreasonably withhold or delay)

 

(v)            all persons entering the Demised Premises shall report to the person notified by the Tenant to the Landlord from time to time on arrival and if so required by the Tenant be accompanied by the Tenant or its representative

 

(vi)           all proper security requirements of the Tenant shall be strictly complied with

 

(d)            No Planning Warranty

 

Nothing in this Lease shall imply or warrant that the Demised Premises may lawfully be used for the Permitted Use

 

(e)            Covenants

 

(i)             The Landlord and the Tenant shall not be liable to each other for breach of any covenant in this Lease to the extent that its performance or observance becomes impossible or illegal but subject to the other provisions of this Lease the Term and the Tenant’s liability to pay the Rent shall not cease or be suspended for that reason

 

(ii)            This Lease does not pass to the Tenant the benefit of or the right to enforce any covenants entered into by any tenant of any of the Lettable Areas ,(but for the avoidance of doubt not those contained in any Superior Lease) and the Landlord

 

10



 

shall be entitled in its sole discretion to waive vary .or release any such covenants

 

(f)             Approvals

 

The Landlord shall incur no liability to the Tenant or any undertenant or any predecessor in title of them by reason of any Consent given to or inspection made of any drawings plans specifications or works prepared or carried out by or on behalf of any such party nor shall any such consent in any way relieve the Tenant from its obligations under this Lease other than any obligation to obtain such consent

 

(g)          N otices

 

Section 196 Law of Property Act 1925 (as amended by the Recorded Delivery Service Act 1962) shall apply to all notices which may need to be served under this Lease and while Isle of Capri Casinos Limited is the Tenant hereunder all notices to be given or served on the Tenant shall be hand delivered or sent by prepaid first class registered or recorded delivery post to the Tenant at its registered office or such other address within England or Wales as the Tenant may notify the. Landlord in writing as being its address for service from time to time and PROVIDED FURTHER that while Isle of Capri Casinos Inc is the Guarantor all notices to be given or served on the Guarantor shall be hand delivered or sent by pre-paid first class registered or recorded delivery post as provided in clause 1.3(i)

 

(h)            New Tenancy

 

This Lease is a new tenancy for the purposes of the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995

 

(i)            Proper Law

 

(i)             This Lease shall be governed by English law and the Tenant and the Guarantor irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the English Courts

 

(ii)            The Guarantor irrevocably authorises and appoints Cozen O’Connor of 25 Old Broad Street Level 27 Tower 42 London EC2N 1HQ (or such other firm of solicitors resident in England or Wales as it may from time to time by written notice to the Landlord substitute) to accept service of all legal process arising out of or connected with this Lease and service on such party shall be deemed to be service on the Guarantor

 

(j)             Agreement for Lease

 

This Lease is entered into pursuant to an Agreement for Lease

 

(k)           Third Parties

 

For the purposes of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 it is agreed nothing in this Lease shall confer or purport to confer on any third party any right to enforce or any benefit of any term of this Lease

 

(1)           Tenant’s Plant

 

It is hereby agreed and declared that the Tenant’s Plant is and shall remain the sole property of the Tenant (subject to the provisions of paragraph 6.6 of Part II of Schedule 7 of this Lease)

 

11



 

(m)           Tenant’s indemnities

 

Subject to the rights and powers of any insurers all indemnities given by the Tenant hereunder to the Landlord shall be subject to the condition that the Landlord shall consult with the Tenant in connection with any claims against the Landlord and any actions and proceedings resulting therefrom and the Landlord shall not settle or compromise any such claim without the prior written consent of the Tenant (such consent not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed)

 

2               Demise and Rent

 

The Landlord demises the Demised Premises to the Tenant together with the Rights reserving to the Landlord the Reservations and subject to (and where appropriate to the Demised Premises with the benefit of) the Title Matters to hold them to the Tenant for the Term paying as Rent:

 

2.1            the Basic Rent to be paid yearly (and proportionately for any part of a year) by equal quarterly instalments in advance on the Payment Days (the first payment to be made on the Rent Commencement Date for the period from the Rent Commencement Date to the next Payment Day and to be calculated in accordance with Schedule 13); and

 

2.2            the Insurance Charge (as defined in Schedule 6) and the Interim Charge (as defined in Schedule 9)

 

2.3            Any VAT chargeable on the Basic Rent or on the Insurance Charge or on the Interim Charge

 

3              Tenant’s Covenants

 

The Tenant covenants with the Landlord to observe and perform the-covenants in schedule 7

 

4               Landlord’s Covenants

 

The Landlord covenants with the Tenant to observe and perform the covenants in schedules 8 and 13

 

5               Re-Entry

 

5.1            “Relevant Event” means when:

 

(a)                                   the whole or part of the Rent or any other sums payable under this Lease remain unpaid 28 days after becoming due (whether in the case of the Basic Rent formally demanded or not); or

 

(b)                                  any of the Tenant’s or the Guarantor’s covenants in this Lease are not performed or observed; or

 

(c)                                   the Tenant or the Guarantor (or if there is more than one Tenant or. Guarantor then if any one of them):

 

(i)             becomes Insolvent

 

(ii)            dies or is dissolved or is removed from the Register of Companies or otherwise ceases to exist

 

12



 

(d)            any event occurs or proceedings are taken against the Tenant or the Guarantor in any jurisdiction which has an effect equivalent or similar to any of the events mentioned in this clause

 

5.2            “Insolvent” means:

 

(a)            in the case of a corporate Tenant or Guarantor if :

 

(i)                                 an administrator or liquidator is appointed or a winding up order of such company is made (save for the purpose of an amalgamation or reconstruction which does not involve or arise out of insolvency) or

 

(ii)                              a receiver or administrative receiver is appointed of the whole or any part of the undertaking property assets or revenues of such company or

 

(iii)                           stops payment or agrees to declare a moratorium or becomes or is deemed to be insolvent or makes a proposal for a voluntary arrangement under Part I of the Insolvency Act 1986 or makes an application under section 425 of the Companies Act 1985

 

(iv)         is unable to pay its debts within the meaning of section 123 Insolvency Act 1986

 

(b)                                  in the case of an individual if such person:

 

(i)             is the subject of a bankruptcy order or

 

(ii)            convenes a meeting of his creditors or any of them or enters into any arrangement scheme compromise or moratorium or composition with his creditors (whether pursuant to Part VIII of the Insolvency Act 1986 or otherwise)

 

(iii)           is the subject of an application or order or appointment under section 253 or section 273 or section 286 of the Insolvency Act 1986 or

 

(iv)           is unable to pay or has no reasonable prospect of being able to pay his debts within the meaning of sections 267 and 268 of the Insolvency Act 1986

 

(v)            has a receiver appointed

 

5.3            If any Relevant Event shall occur then the Landlord may at any time (and.notwithstanding any waiver of any previous right of re-entry) re-enter the Demised Premises (or any part in the name of the whole) whereupon this Lease other than schedule 13 shall immediately determine (but without prejudice to any other rights or powers of either the Landlord the Tenant or the Guarantor in respect of any previous breach of this Lease)

 

5.4            If the interest of the Tenant hereunder shall have been mortgaged or charged and details of the mortgagee or chargee shall have been provided to the Landlord in writing the Landlord will not exercise the rights of re-entry as aforesaid until after the expiry of two months from service by the Landlord of written notice on such mortgagee or chargee (at the mortgagee’s or chargee’s last known address) of the Landlord’s intention to invoke the said re-entry provisions and to exercise its right to re-enter the Demised Premises or any part thereof and then only if the event giving rise to such right remains in existence and (if remediable) and has not been remedied.

 

13



 

6               Guarantor’s Covenants

 

6.1            The Guarantor covenants with the Landlord to observe and perform the covenants in schedule 11

 

6.2            The parties agree and declare that Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc’s liability under this Lease as Guarantor (save in respect of any antecedent breach) shall cease if the Isle of Capri Casinos Inc ceases to be the immediate holding company of Isle of Capri Casinos Limited (as defined in Section 736 of the Companies Act 1985) but this release is subject to the Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc first delivering to the Landlord a Deed (approved by the Landlord in writing such approval not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed) from the new immediate holding company of the Isle of Capri Casinos Limited (the identity of such new immediate holding company having firstly been approved by the Landlord in writing such approval not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed) covenanting with the Landlord in the same form (mutatis mutandis) as this clause 6 (including this clause 6.2 but substituting the name of the new holding company for Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc) and upon such event the Landlord shall if required so to do (at the Tenant’s cost) formally release by deed Isle of Capri Casinos Inc from all liability pursuant to this clause (save in respect of any antecedent breach)

 

6.3            The parties hereto agree and declare that the Guarantor’s liability under this Lease will cease (save in respect of any antecedent breach) if at any time after the date which is 5 years after the Rent Commencement Date the audited and filed accounts of the Tenant  (here meaning Isle of Capri Casinos Limited only) for the three immediately preceding financial years (such years to exclude the first two years of the Term) of Isle of Capri Casinos Limited show on average for those three years pre-tax profits on ordinary activities of at least five times the average Basic Rent for that three year period

 

6.4            Any release of the Guarantor under clause 6.3 shall be without prejudice to any right of action of the Landlord against the Guarantor in respect of any previous breach by the Guarantor

 

7               Break Clause

 

7.1            The Tenant may determine this Lease on 25 December 2020 by serving on the Landlord at least 12 months prior written notice specifying the proposed date of Determination

 

7.2            This Lease shall only determine as a result of notice served by the Tenant under clause 7.1 where the Tenant has paid the Rent due to the date of Determination at the date of Determination

 

7.3            Upon the expiry of the notice of Determination the Tenant shall

 

(a)                                   yield up the Demised Premises to the Landlord in accordance with the covenants on its part contained in this Lease; and

 

(b)                                  deliver to the Landlord the original of this Lease (and any other title documents) and all keys to the Demised Premises

 

whereupon this Lease shall determine but without prejudice to any right of action of either party in respect of any previous breach by the other party

 

7.4            Time is of the essence in respect of this clause 7

 

14



 

7.5            Any notice of Determination served by the Tenant under this clause shall be irrevocable

 

8               Stamp Duty

 

It is hereby certified that this instrument is exempt from stamp duty by virtue of the provisions of Section 92 of the Finance Act 2001

 

IN WITNESS of which the parties have executed this Lease as their Deed on the date above written

 

15



 

EXECUTED as a DEED by

ARENA COVENTRY LIMITED

Acting by:

 

Director

[ILLEGIBLE]

 

Director / Secretary

[ILLEGIBLE]

 

EXECUTED (but not delivered until

the date hereof)

AS A DEED by

ISLE OF CAPRI CASINOS LIMITED

Acting by:

 

 

Director

/s/ Allan B. Solomon

 

 

 

 

Secretary

/s/ Gregory D. Guida

 

 

ISLE OF CAPRI CASINOS

INC intending to be legally bound hereby and

duly authorised has caused this Lease to be executed

 

By:

/s/ Allan B. Solomon

 

By:

/s/ Gregory D. Guida

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name:

Allan B. Solomon

 

Name:

Gregory D. Guida

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Title:

Executive Vice President.

 

Title:

Senior Vice President/Secratery

 

75


Exhibit 10.40

 

MASTER LEASE

 

BETWEEN

 

THE CITY OF BOONVILLE, MISSOURI

 

AND

 

DAVIS GAMING BOONVILLE, INC.

 



 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

ARTICLE 1

LEASED PREMISES

2

1.1

Leased Premises

2

1.2

Permitted Use

2

1.3

Physical Condition

2

1 .4

Lease Term

2

1.5

Designation of Home Dock

2

 

 

 

ARTICLE 2

DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION

3

2.1

General

3

2.2

Construction of Improvements

3

2.3

Riverboat Gaming Project Site Plan

3

2.4

Project Site

3

2.5

Construction of the Land Based Project

4

2.6

Critical Path

6

2.7

Project Engineer; Project Architect

7

2.8

Stoppage of Construction by the City

7

2.9

Completion of the Land Based Project

7

2.10

Access to the Riverboat Gaming Project an d Inspection

8

2.11

Licenses and Permits

8

2.12

Additional Improvements

8

 

 

 

ARTICLE 3

RENT AND OTHER COSTS

9

3.1

Rent

9

3.2

Rebate of Rent

9

3.3

Costs

10

3.4

Net Lease

10

 

 

 

ARTICLE 4

OPERATIONS AND USE

10

4.1

Operations

10

4.2

Use of the Project Site

11

4.3

Traffic

11

4.4

Employment

11

4.5

Security/Safety

11

4.6

Thespian Hall

12

 

 

 

ARTICLE 5

REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE

12

5.1

Maintenance and Repairs

12

5.2

Maintenance Reserve Fund

12

5.3

No Services Furnished

13

 

 

 

ARTICLE 6

INSURANCE

13

6.1

Insurance Coverages

13

6.2

Named Insureds

14

6.3

Waiver of Subrogation and Release

14

6.4

Cancellation/Modification Notice

14

 

i



 

ARTICLE 7

INDEMNIFICATION

14

7.1

Indemnification of the City

14

7.2

Indemnification of Tenant

15

7.3

Notification

15

 

 

 

ARTICLE 8

TAKING AND DESTRUCTION OF PROJECT SITE

15

8.1

Taking of Facilities

15

8.2

Destruction of Riverboat Gaming Project

15

 

 

 

ARTICLE 9

COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS

16

9.1

General Compliance

16

9.2

Environmental Matters

16

 

9.2.1

Negative Covenants

16

 

9.2.2

Removal

16

 

9.2.3

Notification

17

 

9.2.4

Definitions

17

 

9.2.5

Survival

18

9.3

Inspection Rights

18

 

 

 

ARTICLE 10

IMPOSITIONS AND CONTEST

18

10.1

Impositions

18

10.2

Furnished Receipts

18

10.3

Utilities

18

10.4

Protection against Lien Claims

19

10.5

Contest of Liens, Laws and Taxes

19

10.6

City Joinder In Contest

19

 

 

 

ARTICLE 11

THE CITY’S PERFORMANCE OF TENANT’S COVENANTS

20

11.1

The City’s Right to Perform

20

11.2

Repayment by Tenant

20

 

 

 

ARTICLE 12

TERMINATION

20

12.1

Termination Events

20

12.2

Surrender and Delivery of the Project Site

22

12.3

Personal Property Not Removed

22

12.4

The City Not Responsible

22

12.5

Restoration

22

12.6

Survival

22

 

 

 

ARTICLE 13

DEFAULT AND REMEDIES

23

13.1

Default

23

13.2

Remedies

23

 

 

 

ARTICLE 14

BANKRUPTCY

25

14.1

Events of Bankruptcy

25

14.2

The City’s Remedies

25

 

 

 

ARTICLE 15

ASSIGNMENT/SUBLEASE/ENCUMBRANCE

27

15.1

Assignment, Subletting and Other Transfers

27

15.2

Limited Right to Encumber Leasehold Interest

29

 

ii



 

ARTICLE 16

COVENANTS

35

16.1

Covenants By the City

35

16.2

Covenants By Tenant

36

 

16.2.1

Enforceability

36

 

16.2.2

Power and Authority

36

 

16.2.3

No Conflicts

36

 

16.2.4

Financial Condition

36

 

16.2.5

No Contract Defaults

36

 

16.2.6

No Litigation

36

 

16.2.7

Opinion of Counsel

37

 

 

 

ARTICLE 17

GENERAL PROVISIONS

37

17.1

Notices

37

17.2

Police Power Limitation

38

17.3

Failure to Perform By the City

38

17.4

No Liability

38

17.5

Force Majeure

39

17.6

Certificates

39

17.7

Waiver of Jury Trial and Counterclaims

.39

17.8

Binding Effect

39

17.9

No Joint Venture Or Partnership

39

17.10

Attorneys Fees

40

17.11

Governing Law

40

17.12

Amendments

40

17.13

Entire Agreement

40

17.14

Multiple Originals

40

17.15

Severability

40

17.16

Interpretation

40

17.17

Waiver

40

17.18

Memorandum of Lease

41

 

iii



 

MASTER . LEASE


BETWEEN


THE CITY OF BOONVILLE, MISSOURI


AND


DAVIS GAMING BOONVILLE, INC. ,

 

THIS LEASE (this “Lease”) is made on July 18, 1997 by the City of Boonville, Missouri, a Missouri third class city (the “City”) and Davis Gaming Boonville, Inc. (f/k/a Gold River’s Boonville , Resort, Inc.) a Nevada corporation (“Tenant”).

 

The City and Tenant entered into a Master Agreement for Boonville, Missouri Riverboat Gaming Project dated March 7, 1994 and an Amendment to Master Agreement for Boonville, Missouri Riverboat Gaming Project dated November 10, 1994, a Second Amendment to Master Agreement dated May 1, 1995, a Third Amendment to Master Agreement and Amendment to Development Agreement dated February 5, 1996, all as amended and restated pursuant to an Amended and Restated Master Agreement dated as of July 18, 1997 (collectively the “Master Agreement”) for the development of the Riverboat Gaming Project on the Project Site, a map of which is attached as Exhibit A .

 

Under the Master Agreement, Water Street or Tenant is to acquire the Project Site and transfer the Project Site, as acquired, to the City and construct the Land Based Project pursuant to the Master Agreement and this Lease. The City is to lease the Project Site to Tenant pursuant to this Lease.

 

Any capitalized term used in this Lease and not defined in this Lease shall have the same meaning given, such term in the Master Agreement except that the term “Project Site” shall for purposes of this Lease only refer to that portion of the Project Site as defined in the Master Agreement which is actually acquired by Tenant and transferred to the City. It is intended that for purposes of this Lease, the Project Site shall change as additional property is acquired and transferred to the City by Tenant under the Master Agreement and references to Project Site shall refer to only those parcels of property otherwise within the entire Project Site as contemplated in the Master Agreement and that at the time have been transferred to or are owned by the City.

 



 

ARTICLE 1
LEASED PREMISES

 

1.1           Leased Premises . The City leases to Tenant, and Tenant leases from the City, the Project Site, as it may exist from time to time, when acquired by the Tenant or Water Street and conveyed to the City. The legal description of the Project Site as of the date of this Lease is attached as Exhibit B . As additional parcels become part of the Project Site, the legal description of such parcels will be added to Exhibit B . The parties acknowledge that, in accordance with Section 1.3 of the Master Agreement, the City’s rights in the Railroad Portion may arise under the Railroad Lease or by acquisition and that the City’s rights in the DNR Portion may arise under the DNR Lease or by acquisition. The parties acknowledge that the City does not currently own the entire Project Site and that it is the sole responsibility of Tenant and Water Street to acquire and transfer the Project Site to the City, but only to the extent required under the Master Agreement.

 

1.2           Permitted Use . The sole permitted use of the Project Site is the construction and operation of an integrated gaming and entertainment facility. Tenant will operate the Riverboat Gaming Project in a manner consistent with (i) the terms of the Master Agreement and this Lease, and (ii) all applicable laws, rules and regulations.

 

1.3           Physical Condition . Except as otherwise provided in this Lease, - Tenant accepts the Project Site, as is, without any representations or warranties of any kind by the City.

 

1.4           Lease Term . The term (the “Term”) of this Lease shall commence on the date hereof (the “Commencement Date”) and unless terminated earlier, pursuant to this Lease, shall expire on the date (the “Expiration Date”) ninety-nine (99) years after the Commencement Date, except that with respect to those parts of the Subleased Portions which are subject to a Prime Lease, if the Prime Lease for such Subleased Portion is earlier terminated, then the Expiration Date with regard only to such Subleased Portion shall be the date on which the Prime Lease for such Subleased Portion terminates. For purposes of this Lease and the Project Documents, the term “Opening Date” shall mean the date on which the Missouri Gaming Commission first issues a license to Tenant to open the Riverboat/Floating Facility for business to the public.

 

1.5           Designation of Home Dock .  Pursuant to all applicable Missouri gaming laws, including but not limited to Chapter 313, RSMo., Tenant designates the City as its sole and exclusive “home dock” (as that term is defined in Chapter 313, RSMo, as amended). This designation shall not prevent the temporary docking of the Riverboat/Floating Facility at another location if the Project Site is damaged during the period of repairs as long as Tenant is using its best efforts to complete such repairs as expeditiously as

 

2



 

possible, nor shall this designation prevent Tenant from acquiring additional riverboats and designating different home docks for the different boats.

 

ARTICLE 2
DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION

 

2.1           General . Tenant will, at its sole cost, develop the Riverboat Gaming Project pursuant to the Project Documents and in the Phases set forth herein. The parties acknowledge that the Phases or any combination thereof may be pursued in whole or in part concurrently.

 

2.2           Construction of Improvements . Construction of all improvements in accordance with the Project Documents (including all exhibits and attachments to the Project Documents) is a condition of this Lease.

 

2.3           Riverboat Gaming Project Site Plan . Tenant, at its cost, will prepare plans and specifications for the Riverboat Gaming Project and the Land Based Project (the “Riverboat Gaming Project Site Plan”), including all buildings, infrastructure and other construction, consistent with the Project Documents. Tenant will submit the Riverboat Gaming Project . Site Plan for review and approval by the City. Prior to the date Tenant commences construction of the Riverboat Gaming Project, the Riverboat Gaming Project Site Plan will be attached to this Lease as Exhibit C and thereby made a part of this Lease, subject to subsequent revisions as are approved by the City in its reasonable discretion in the event of any substitution between the Preferred Site Configuration and the Alternate Site Configuration. The construction of the Riverboat Gaming Project will be completed substantially in accordance with the Riverboat Gaming Project Site Plan and all applicable laws, rules and regulations. Tenant will obtain the written approval of the City before making any material changes in the Riverboat Gaming Project Site Plan. The City agrees to act promptly and reasonably with respect to all requests for approval of the Riverboat Gaming Project Site Plan and/or modifications thereof.

 

2.4           Project Site . Tenant, with the City’s assistance, at Tenant’s sole cost, will prepare all plats, obtain all vacation of streets, easements, construction permits, floor plans, certificates, utility consents for relocation of utilities, surveys and perform all other actions necessary for the development and operation of the Riverboat Gaming Project. Tenant will grant to the City, in a form which is reasonably acceptable to Tenant and the City, all easements reasonably requested by the City with respect to the Project Site and normally granted to a City in a development. All streets within the Project Site shall be public streets provided that all land up to the curb line will remain, pursuant to this Lease, leased to Tenant.

 

3



 

2.5           Construction of the Land Based Project .

 

2.5.1      Tenant will complete construction of the Land Based Project in two phases, Phase I/II and Phase III.

 

2.5.1.1           INTENTIONALLY DELETED

 

2.5.1.2           No later than June 23, 1997, Tenant will fund the Acquisition Escrow Account (as provided in the Acquisition Escrow Agreement) in the amount provided for in Section 2.5.2 of the Master Agreement. No later than the date on which Tenant begins construction of Phase I/II, Tenant will place into the Construction Escrow Account the sum of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000). During Phase I/II, and in all event (but subject to Section 17.5) no later than April 3, 2001, Tenant will (i) acquire and/or complete construction of the Riverboat/Floating Facility; (ii) complete the acquisition of the Project Site; and (iii) complete the construction of Phase I/II in accordance with the Project Documents and the final Riverboat Gaming Project Site Plan.

 

2.5.1.3           Phase III will occur in accordance with the terms hereof on an ongoing basis as cash for capital expenditures is generated from operations; provided, however, Phase III must be completed, subject to the provisions of Section 17.5 of this Lease, no later than April 3, 2000. Before proceeding with any Phase III Project Increments, Tenant will, pursuant to the Construction Escrow Agreement, fund the Construction Escrow Account with respect to the applicable Project Increment to the extent not then completed. Tenant, will allocate three and one half percent (3.5%) (“Applicable Gross Revenues”) of the gross revenues (“Gross Revenues”) from the Riverboat Gaming Project to pay for the Project Increments and will, within twenty days after each March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 occurring between the Opening Date and the date on which the Construction Escrow Account has been fully funded with respect to all of the Project Increments not then completed, deposit into the Construction Escrow Account the full amount of the Applicable Gross Revenues realized during the calendar quarter then ended. Tenant will provide to the City copies of all reports filed with the Missouri Gaming Commission relating to Gross Revenues as well as monthly financial statements and yearly audited financial statements for the Riverboat Gaming Project. Once the allocated and Applicable Gross. Revenues are sufficient to fund a Project Increment, the construction of which at such time is then appropriate in Tenant’s

 

4



 

reasonable business judgment for the overall benefit of the Riverboat Gaming Project, Tenant shall submit and diligently pursue the building or other applicable permit. No later than thirty (30) days after the issuance of a building or other applicable permit from the City of Boonville to construct a Project Increment, Tenant shall (i) fund the Construction Escrow Account as provided in the Construction Escrow Agreement to the extent not then fully funded with respect to such Project Increment from deposits of Applicable Gross Revenues (it being understood that in all events and regardless of insufficient Applicable Gross Revenues, Phase III must be completed, including payment in full of the Additional Payment, subject to Section 17.5, no later than April 3, 2000); (ii) enter into Construction Contracts with contractors reasonably acceptable to the City; and (iii) commence construction of such Project Increment. This procedure will be repeated with respect to all Project Increments. Without affecting the obligation of the Developer to complete Phase III no later than April 3, 2000, including payment in full of the Additional Payment, subject to Section 17.5, in the event that all of the Project Increments have been completed other than payment of the Additional Payment, the funds thereafter from time to time on deposit in the Phase III Construction Escrow Subaccount shall be disbursed to the City as installments of the Additional Payment on each April 30, July 31, October 31, and January 31 until the Additional Payment has been paid in full.

 

2.5.2       Tenant will not commence construction of any portion of the Land Based Project or any Project Increment until the following conditions have been satisfied or waived with respect to such portion or Project Increment by the City, in addition to any other conditions and requirements imposed by this Lease or the Project Documents:

 

2.5.2.1     the City approves the Riverboat Gaming Project Site Plan;

 

2.5.2.2     INTENTIONALLY DELETED

 

2.5.2.3     Tenant has funded the Construction Escrow Account in the amount of $1,000,000 and has obtained all payment, performance and completion bonds in form and amount approved by the City as required under Article 6 of this Lease;

 

2.5.2.4     Tenant has obtained all permits and other governmental approvals necessary to commence construction;

 

5



 

2.5.2.5     Tenant has provided to the City copies of the contract with each of its contractors. In addition, but not as a condition of commencement of construction, Tenant shall provide to the City a copy of each subcontractor’s contract within ten (10) days of receipt by Tenant of each contract;

 

2.5.2.6     the Commencement Date has occurred;

 

2.5.2.7     the applicable portions of the Project Site have been transferred to the City; and

 

2.5.2.8     the contracts (the “Contracts”) with any architect, other design professional and any general contractor shall provide, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the City, for the assignment of the Contracts to the City as security to the City for Tenant’s performance under this Lease, and Tenant shall provide the City copies of the Contracts, together with the further agreement of the respective parties to such Contracts, that if this Lease is terminated, the City may, at its election, use the Riverboat Gaming Project Site Plan as well as any other plans and specifications relating to the Land Based Project upon the payment of any future sums due to any party to the Contract. Tenant conditionally assigns the Contracts and the Riverboat Gaming Project Site Plan to the City, effective upon the termination of this Lease and notice by the City of its exercise of such assignment. Such assignment is self-operative upon the City giving such notice without requirement of further action or documentation by the parties. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Section 2.5.2.8, a “Lender” (as defined in Article 15 below) shall not be prohibited from possessing a security interest in the Contracts during the term of a “Leasehold Encumbrance” (as defined in Article 15 below) as long as the City’s rights are superior to Lender’s rights if and when this Lease terminates.

 

2.6           Critical Path .

 

2.6.1        Simultaneously with the funding of the Construction Escrow Account, Tenant will provide a “Phase I/II Critical Path” to the City which will set forth the projected start date of each improvement in the Phase I/II Land Based Project and the Riverboat/Floating Facility, the manner in which each improvement in the Phase I/II Land Based Project and the Riverboat/Floating Facility will be constructed and a projected completion date for each improvement in the Phase I/II Land Based Project and the Riverboat/Floating Facility.

 

6



 

2.6.2                         INTENTIONALLY DELETED

 

2.6.3                         Simultaneously with the funding of the Construction Escrow Account for each Project Increment in the Phase III Land Based Project, Tenant will provide the City a “Phase III Critical Path”, which will set forth the projected start date for each such Project Increment, the manner in which such Project Increment will be constructed and a projected completion date for such Project Increment.

 

2.6.4                         Tenant shall have the right to modify the Critical Path(1) for each Phase of the Riverboat Gaming Project with the City’s prior written consent which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed.

 

2.7                                 Project Engineer; Project Architect .   Throughout the period of construction of the Land Based Project, the Project Engineer and the Project Architect, engaged at Tenant’s sole cost, and approved by the City, which approval may not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, shall be retained on behalf of and for the benefit of Tenant and the City, to monitor and check the progress of Tenant’s work on the Land Based Project. The Project Engineer and the Project Architect will be given reasonable access to the Project Site and all plans, specifications and other permits, documents and reports relating to the construction of the Land Based Project.

 

2.8                                 Stoppage of Construction by the City .   Where there is a material deviation from the Riverboat Gaming Project Site Plan which has not been approved by the City, the City will have the right, after written notice to Tenant, and failure to cure as provided in this Lease, to order stoppage of construction and demand that such condition be corrected. After issuance of such an order in writing by the City, no further work will be done on the construction of the Land Based Project without the prior written consent of the City, until such conditions have been substantially corrected.

 

2.9                                 Completion of the Land Based Project .

 

2.9.1                         Neither any portion of the Phase I/II Land Based Project nor any Project Increment will be operated until the Project Engineer has certified the substantial completion of the infrastructure (i.e. the streets, sewers, utilities, and parking lots) with respect to such portion of the Phase I/II Land Based Project or Project Increment, as the case may be, and the Project Architect certifies that such portion or Project Increment has been substantially completed and the

 


(1)                                   The Phase I/II Critical Path and the Phase III Critical Path are collectively referred to as the “Critical Path.”

 

7



 

City issues a temporary occupancy permit (each such date shall be the “Completion Date” with respect to the work which Tenant wishes to utilize).

 

2.9.2                         Upon completion of Phase I/II and each respective Project Increment, Tenant will provide the City with a complete and legible set of all as-built plans and specifications (including all operating manuals for mechanical systems but excluding surveillance and security systems and secure or sensitive areas) regarding the same, as such plans and specifications may be amended from time to time, within thirty (30) days after such as-built plans and specifications or amendments are received by Tenant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City, at its sole discretion, may permit operation of part of the Riverboat Gaming Project prior to certification of substantial completion.

 

2.9.3                         Tenant agrees not to open the Riverboat Gaming Project for business to the public until Phase I/II has been substantially completed.

 

2.10                           Acc ess to the Riverboat Gaming Project and Inspection .   Tenant will advise the city regarding the progress of negotiating and contracting for the construction of the Riverboat Gaming Project. The city and Tenant will meet on a mutually agreeable day and time, at a mutually agreeable place, on a monthly basis to discuss the status of the Riverboat Gaming Project generally. Until the construction of the Riverboat Gaming Project is completed, each party will use its reasonable best efforts to keep the other informed as to the status of its efforts and all material events occurring with respect to the Riverboat Gaming Project. The city or its duly appointed agents may, at all reasonable times, enter upon the Project Site and examine and inspect the Riverboat Gaming Project.

 

2.11                           Licenses and Permits .   Tenant will, using its best efforts, apply for and obtain all gaming licenses; occupational permits and construction licenses and approvals necessary for the Riverboat Gaming Project.

 

2.12                           Additional Improvements .   Tenant may not materially alter or (other than as necessary for and as directly related to required repairs) enlarge or structurally change any improvements constructed in the Project Site or construct additional improvements on the Project Site without the City’s prior written consent and approval of plans and specifications for such changes or additions, which consent and approval will not be unreasonably withheld or delayed.

 

8



 

ARTICLE 3
RENT AND OTHER COSTS

 

3.1                                 Rent .

 

3.1.1                         Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any Project Document, Tenant will pay a rent payment (the “Lump Sum Rent”) of $1,700,000 to the City, as follows:

 

(1)                               the sum of Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000) has been paid, which the City acknowledges it has already received; and

 

(2)                               the sum of One Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,500,000) shall be paid in two installments, as follows: (i) the first installment (the “First Installment”) shall be in the amount necessary to fund the design and/or engineering of the Traffic Improvements, and shall be payable no later than ten (10) days after such amount has been determined (and the parties acknowledge that in partial payment of the First Installment, the Tenant has advanced to the City the sum of One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150,000)), and (ii) the second installment shall be in the amount of One Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,500,000) less the First Installment (to the extent then previously paid), and shall be payable on or before Tenant begins construction of Phase I/II.

 

The Lump Sum Rent will be fully earned by the City upon the dates due in consideration of the lost opportunity to the City for alternative uses and development of the Project Site.

 

3.1.2                         Tenant’s payment of the Lump Sum Rent pursuant to Section 3.1.1 is a condition of this Lease.

 

3.1.3                         Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Lease, Tenant shall be solely responsible for all obligations, including all monetary requirements under each Prime Lease.

 

3.1.4                         Other than the Lump Sum Rent and the rent required in each Prime Lease, there shall be no other rent, percentage rent, or any equivalent payment constituting rent or docking fees, other than Impositions (defined below) and the Additional Payment (which is a Phase III Project Increment), required to be paid to the City under this Lease.

 

3.2                                 Rebate of Rent .   After the City has received Eight Hundred Thousand Dollars ($800,000) in Fees (defined below), Tenant

 

9



 

will receive a dollar for dollar rebate (the “Rebate”), up to $200,000, of the Lump Sum Rent for every additional dollar which the City receives from the admission fees (the “Fees”) paid with respect to each gaming passenger of the Riverboat/Floating Facility pursuant to Section 313.820.1, RSMo, or any subsequent section of the Missouri statutes which imposes the same or similar admission fee (regardless of how such admission fee is identified), during the one-year period following the Opening Date. The City shall pay the Rebate to Tenant within thirty (30) days of the City’s receipt of the Fees from the State of Missouri. Except as provided by this Section 3.2, Tenant shall not be entitled to any rebate, refund or proration of the Lump Sum Rent for any reason.

 

3.3                                 Costs .   Except as otherwise provided in this Lease, the Riverboat Gaming Project will be developed and operated at the sole cost of Tenant and the City will have no liability and. will bear no expense whatsoever for any of the costs or expenses associated with the Riverboat Gaming Project.

 

3.4                                 Net Lease .   After the Commencement Date, except as expressly provided in this Lease, all costs, expenses and obligations of every kind and nature whatsoever relating to the Project Site and/or the operation of the Riverboat Gaming Project, which may arise or become due during or after the Term (but only with respect to the period of time within the Term of this Lease), shall be paid by Tenant, and the City shall be protected, defended, indemnified and held harmless by Tenant from and against the payment of same and/or any obligation or claimed obligation to pay the same.

 

ARTICLE 4
OPERATIONS AND USE

 

4.1                                 O perations .   Tenant will have the right (subject to the provisions of Article 12 of this Lease) and responsibility to continuously operate, subject to Section 17.5 of this Lease, the Riverboat Gaming Project in the manner set forth in this Lease; provided, however Tenant may change the nature and character of the businesses located within the Activity Center, in Tenant’s reasonable discretion. Tenant will keep the non-enclosed areas of the Land Based Project (including, without limitation, the amphitheater) open to the general public, without charge, as an outdoor public area provided that Tenant shall have the right to close the park areas after 11 p.m. and prior to 6 a.m. and at other times for reasonable security and safety reasons. Tenant agrees and acknowledges that the Riverboat Gaming Project is to be operated as an integrated entertainment and gaming facility and that Tenant’s operation of the Riverboat Gaming Project is part of the City’s consideration for selecting Tenant as operator of a riverboat casino facility, granting urban redevelopment rights to Water Street and entering into this Lease, the Master Agreement and the other Project Documents.

 

10



 

4.2                                 Use of the Project Site .

 

4.2.1                         Tenant will conduct its gaming business, and operate the Riverboat Gaming Project, in all respects in a quality manner and in accordance with the highest standards of operation for similar businesses on the Missouri and Mississippi Rivers in Missouri. The Riverboat Gaming Project will not be operated in any manner which is unlawful, immoral or would constitute a nuisance. Toward that end, Tenant agrees that it will not sell, distribute, display or offer to sell any item, or permit any subtenant, licensee or concessionaire in the Project Site, to sell, distribute, display or offer to sell any item, which is inconsistent with the quality of operation and the ambiance and character of the Riverboat Gaming Project, or which might tend to injure or detract from the moral character or image of the Riverboat Gaming Project. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Tenant will not permit the sale, distribution, display or offer for sale of (i) any roach clip, water pipe, toke, coke spoon, cigarette papers, hypodermic syringe or other paraphernalia commonly used in the use or ingestion of illicit drugs, or (ii) any pornographic newspapers, books, magazines, films, performance pictures, video, representation or merchandise of any kind.

 

4.2.2                         Tenant will, at its expense: (i) keep the Riverboat Gaming Project clean, including but not limited to the removal of ice and snow from all streets, traffic ways, alleys, walkways, parking lots, and other areas within the Project Site reasonably requested by the City, and in a sanitary condition; (ii) replace promptly any broken glass; and (iii) keep any garbage, trash, rubbish or other refuse in City approved containers until removed, which will be done on a reasonable basis; and (iv) Tenant will, at its cost, use its reasonable best efforts to keep the Riverboat Gaming Project free of rodents, vermin and other pests.

 

4.3                                 Traffic .   Tenant and the City will agree upon a traffic flow plan which provides that traffic may gain access to the Riverboat Gaming Project while minimizing the usage of the residential streets in the vicinity of the Project Site.

 

4.4                                 Employment .   Tenant will give preference to residents of and businesses located in the City of Boonville as well as minority owned and women owned businesses with respect to employment in connection with the construction and operation of the Riverboat Gaming Project subject to all federal, state and local employment and anti-discrimination laws and subject to their ability to perform.

 

4.5                                 Security/Safety .   Tenant will implement and carry out reasonable security and safety measures for the Riverboat Gaming

 

11



 

Project. This obligation shall in no way lessen the obligation of the City to provide normal police and law enforcement services to Tenant and the Riverboat Gaming Project as are available to other businesses located in the City of Boonville. The City and Tenant agree to cooperate to implement satisfactory coordination between the security provided by Tenant and the City’s police responsibilities.

 

4.6                                  Thespian Hall .   Tenant will coordinate activities at the Land Based Project with those of Thespian Hall to promote year round activities at Thespian Hall. Tenant will ensure that activities at. the Land Based Project will not compete with activities at Thespian Hall. It is expressly acknowledged that the operations of the Riverboat/Floating Facility shall not be deemed competition with the activities of Thespian Hall.

 

ARTICLE 5
REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE

 

5.1                                  Maintenance and Repairs .   Tenant, at its sole cost, will repair, maintain and care for the Riverboat Gaming Project and shall keep the same in good order and condition, except for reasonable wear and tear, and shall make all necessary repairs, interior and exterior, structural and nonstructural. All repairs and maintenance will be of at least the same quality as the original work, ordinary wear and tear excepted.

 

5.2                                  Maintenance Reserve Fund .   Prior to Opening Date, Tenant will establish a repair and maintenance reserve fund (the “Maintenance Reserve Fund”) which will equal the annual estimated “Recurring Repair and Maintenance Expenditures” (as defined below) for the portion of the Land Based Project to be completed by the Opening Date. The Maintenance Reserve Fund will be adjusted yearly to the prior year’s Recurring Repair and Maintenance Expenditures for the portion of the Land Based Project completed on the first day of the prior year plus an amount equal to the reasonable annual estimated Recurring Repair and Maintenance Expenditures for any other portion of the Land Based Project to be used during the then commencing year. Tenant will each year deposit additional funds into the Maintenance Reserve Fund as needed to bring the balance of the Maintenance Reserve Fund to the level required for the year commencing. The Maintenance Reserve Fund will be held by the City, as landlord, in an interest bearing account with all interest to be paid to Tenant, and may be used by the City if Tenant defaults in its repair or maintenance obligations under the Project Documents or if this Lease and/or the Master Agreement terminates. As used herein, “Recurring Repair and Maintenance Expenditures” means expenditures, whether or not capitalized, for repair and maintenance in the ordinary course of operation of the Land Based Project: (i) of the improvements at the Land Based Project, and (ii) of the landscaping at the Project Site. Recurring Repair and Maintenance Expenditures shall not include, however: (a) costs of

 

12



 

snow removal, lawn mowing, janitorial services and other routine operating expenses, or (b) the amount of any extraordinary capital expenditures by Tenant for major replacement of or additions to the landscaping at the Project Site or the improvements at the Land Based Project.

 

5.3                                  No Services Furnished .   The City shall not be required to furnish to Tenant any utilities, facilities or services of any kind whatsoever during the Term other than normal fire, police and other law enforcement services as are available to other businesses in the City of Boonville; provided, further, that if the City also operates any public utility, then such services from such public utility will be available to Tenant and Tenant shall pay to the City for such services the same rates as any other commercial customer of similar size. The City shall in no event be required to make any alterations, rebuildings, replacements, changes, additions, improvements or repairs during the Term.

 

ARTICLE 6
INSURANCE

 

6.1                                  Insu rance Coverages .   Tenant will continuously throughout the Term provide, at its sole cost, the following insurance for the Riverboat Gaming Project in amounts approved by the City: standard property peril insurance in the amount of full replacement value, excluding foundation and footers; flood and earthquake insurance to the extent reasonably available in the amount of replacement value for the Land Based Project; commercial (comprehensive) liability insurance policies, including (but not limited to) bodily injury, property damage, contractor’s liability coverage, with broad form property damage endorsement or its equivalent with initial limits of no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 in the aggregate; completion and performance bond in standard form and in an amount not less than the total amount of the contract for the work to be completed under such contract on the Riverboat Gaming Project; comprehensive automobile liability insurance with initial limits of no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $1,000,000 in the aggregate; builder’s risk and (if Tenant is contracting for a boat to be built) ship builder’s risk insurance; umbrella and excess umbrella insurance with initial limits of no less than $10,000,000; and Workers’ Compensation, Longshoreman and Harbor Workers and Maritime Liability (Jones Act Coverage) insurance policy or similar insurance in form and amounts required by law, including employer’s liability. All limits set forth in this Lease shall annually be adjusted for inflation. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in lieu of Tenant obtaining such completion and performance bond, Tenant may, at its option, provide a guaranty in form and content reasonably acceptable to the City on the part of a person or entity of financial strength reasonably acceptable to the City guaranteeing to the City, in the event the contractor fails to perform under the construction contract and the construction contract is terminated as a result thereof, the

 

13



 

payment of that amount, if any, which is incurred by the City in causing the completion of the work which is the subject of the construction contract and which exceeds the contract price under the construction contract at the time of the contract’s termination (exclusive of any net increase solely attributable to change orders modifying the scope of the work and generated by the City after the contract’s termination or other cost increases solely attributable to acts or omissions of the City).

 

6.2                                  Named Insureds .   All policies of insurance provided for in this Article 6 shall name Tenant as the insured, and the City as an additional named insured, as their respective interests may appear. Prior to the Commencement Date, and at least thirty (30) days before the expiration of each policy then in force, Tenant shall deliver to the City certificates evidencing the existence of all required insurance policies.

 

6.3                                  Waiver of Subrogation and Release .   Provided that the following can be obtained and at a reasonable cost. (Tenant acknowledging that as of the date of this Lease, the following can be obtained and at a reasonable cost), each such policy shall contain an endorsement containing a waiver of subrogation so that no act or omission of the City or anyone operating under rights granted by it shall affect or limit the obligation of the issuing insurance company to pay the amount of any loss sustained. Tenant for itself and all parties claiming by, through or under it, release and discharges the City, its officers and agents, from all losses, damages, claims or liabilities arising by reason of any peril insurable (subject to exceptions and exclusions of such policy) pursuant to the property peril insurance policy required under Section 6.1 hereof.

 

6.4                                  Cancellation/Modification Notice .   Each such policy or certificate issued by the insurer shall contain an agreement by the insurer that such policy shall not be canceled, modified, nonrenewed or amended without at least thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City.

 

ARTICLE 7
INDEMNIFICATION

 

7.1                                  Indemnification of the City .   Tenant will defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City against and in respect of any obligation, liability (excluding any exemplary damages) or expense (including court costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees) incurred by the City as a result of any claim or action brought against the City arising out of the acquisition, development or operation of the Riverboat Gaming Project or in connection with the Project Site or the Riverboat Gaming Project except damages arising out of the negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its agents and employees, or the City’s failure to properly follow the statutory

 

14



 

and other governing rules and procedures required of the City to properly take an action.

 

7.2                                  Indemnification of Tenant .   The City will defend, indemnify and hold harmless Tenant against and in respect of any obligation, liability (excluding any exemplary damages) or expense (including court costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees) incurred by Tenant as a result of any claim or action brought against Tenant arising out of any (i) negligence or willful misconduct of the City or its agents or employees, as landlord, or (ii) any misfeasance or malfeasance of the City or its agents or employees in its capacity as a governing body, in connection with the Project Site or the Riverboat Gaming Project.

 

7.3                                  Notification .   The party seeking indemnification (the “Indemnitee”) shall notify the party from whom indemnification is sought (the “Indemnitor”) in writing of any action, suit or proceeding for which indemnification is sought and the Indemnitor shall have the right to retain counsel of the Indemnitor’s reasonable choice and at the sole cost of the Indemnitor, to defend the Indemnitee; provided, however, the Indemnitor shall not enter into any settlement without the prior written consent of the Indemnitee, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed.

 

ARTICLE 8
TAXING AND DESTRUCTION OF PROJECT SITE

 

8.1                                  Taking of Facilities .   If all or any part of Tenant’s leasehold interest under this Lease is taken through powers of eminent domain exercised by a governmental entity other than the City, Tenant shall receive 90% and the City shall receive 10% of the condemnation award. If any part of the Project Site is taken through the exercise of eminent domain, Tenant shall have the right to reconfigure the Project Site and modify the Riverboat Gaming Project as necessary as the result of the eminent domain. The City shall not grant any eminent domain rights with respect to the Project Site other than to Water Street so long as this Lease remains in effect.

 

8.2                                  Destruction of Riverboat Gaming Project .   If nonmaterial damage or destruction occurs with respect to all or any part of the Riverboat Gaming Project during the Term, Tenant shall rebuild that portion of the Riverboat Gaming Project destroyed and all work performed shall be of at least equal quality to the original work, ordinary wear and tear excepted. If material damage or destruction occurs with respect to all or any part of the Riverboat Gaming Project during the Term, Tenant may rebuild that portion of the Riverboat Gaming Project destroyed and all work performed shall be of at least equal quality to the original work, ordinary wear and tear excepted; provided, however if Tenant elects not to rebuild then Tenant shall pay to the City (i) all insurance proceeds, other

 

15



 

than any loss of income or loss of business proceeds, payable with respect to the Land Based Project together with the deductible amount under the insurance policy(ies) with respect to which Tenant is to pay the proceeds to the City or (ii) if the amount of the damage does not exceed the deductible, the amount of the damage, and this Lease shall terminate.

 

ARTICLE 9
COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS

 

9.1                                 General Compliance .   During the Term, Tenant, at its sole cost, shall promptly comply with all applicable present and future laws, ordinances, orders, rules, regulations and requirements of all federal, state and municipal governments, departments, commissions, boards and officers, or other body or bodies exercising similar functions, foreseen or unforeseen, ordinary as well as extraordinary, which may be applicable to the Riverboat Gaming Project.

 

9.2                                 Environmental Matters .

 

9.2.1                         Negative Covenants .   Tenant covenants and agrees not to: (i) bring to or place on the Riverboat Gaming. Project any Hazardous Materials (defined below) other than in such Quantities as are reasonably necessary in connection with the conduct of Tenant’s business at the Riverboat Gaming Project; (ii) dump, flush or otherwise dispose of any Hazardous Materials (defined below) into the Missouri River or any drainage, sewage or waste disposal systems serving the Riverboat Gaming Project; (iii) generate, store or use (other than in such quantities as are reasonably necessary in connection with the conduct of Tenant’s business at the Riverboat Gaming Project), release, spill or dispose of any Hazardous Materials (defined below) in or on the Riverboat Gaming Project except in strict compliance with Environmental Laws (defined below); (iv) transfer or transport any Hazardous Materials (defined below) from the Riverboat Gaming Project to any other location except in strict compliance with Environmental Laws (defined below); (v) commit or allow to be committed in or on the Riverboat Gaming Project any act which would require any reporting or filing of any notice with any governmental agency pursuant to any Environmental Law (defined below).

 

9.2.2                         Removal .   Tenant agrees that if during the Term it or anyone shall generate, store (other than in such quantities as are reasonably necessary in connection with the conduct of Tenant’s business at the Riverboat Gaming Project), release, spill, dispose of, or transfer or transport (other than in such quantities as are, reasonably necessary in connection with the conduct of Tenant’s business at the Riverboat. Gaming Project) to the Riverboat Gaming Project any

 

16



 

“Hazardous Materials” (defined below), Tenant will immediately remove the same, at its sole cost, in the manner provided by all applicable “Environmental Laws” (defined below); regardless of when such Hazardous Materials are discovered. Furthermore, Tenant shall (i) pay and (ii) indemnify, defend and hold the City harmless against, all fines, penalties, claims, demands and other assessments (including without limitation, remediation costs and environmental damages) imposed or brought by any governmental agency or others with respect to any Hazardous Materials and will immediately repair and restore any portion of the Riverboat Gaming Project and/or the Missouri River which it damages or disturbs in removing any such Hazardous Materials and remediating the Riverboat Gaming Project to the condition which existed prior to the damage \ or disturbance.

 

9.2.3                Notification . Tenant shall deliver promptly to the City any notices, orders or similar documents received from any governmental agency or official concerning any violation of any Environmental Laws or with respect to any Hazardous Materials affecting or emanating from the Riverboat Gaming Project.

 

9.2.4                Definitions .

 

9.2.4.1     As used in this Lease, the term “Hazardous Materials” shall be interpreted broadly to mean and include any oils, petroleum, petroleum by-products, asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls, urea formaldehyde, and any other toxic or hazardous wastes, materials, pollutants and substances which are defined, classified., determined or identified as such in any Environmental Laws, or in any judicial or administrative interpretation of Environmental Laws.

 

9.2.4.2     As used in this Lease, “Environmental Laws” shall mean all federal, state, local and foreign statutes, laws, regulations, ordinances, rules, judgments, orders, decrees, codes, plans, injunctions, permits, concessions, grants, franchises, licenses, agreements or other governmental restrictions relating to the environment or to emissions, discharges or releases of pollutants, contaminants, petroleum or petroleum by-products, chemicals or industrial, toxic or hazardous substances, materials or wastes into the environment including, without limitation, ambient air, surface water, ground water or land, or otherwise relating to the manufacture, processing, distribution, use, treatment, storage, disposal, transport or handling of pollutants, contaminants, petroleum or petroleum products, chemicals or industrial, toxic or hazardous substances or wastes or their cleanup or other remediation.

 

17



 

9.2.5        Survival .    The obligations of Tenant contained in this Section 9.2 shall survive the termination of this Lease.

 

9.3           I nspection Rights .    The City, its officers, employees, contractors and agents shall have the right, but not the duty, to inspect the Project Site and Tenant’s relevant environmental, land use and other documents, and to perform such tests on the Project Site and the adjacent river as are reasonably necessary to determine whether Tenant is complying with the material terms of . this Article 9 at any reasonable time, so long as such inspection does not reasonably interfere with Tenant’s ongoing business operations. The City shall be responsible for any and all damage it, its officers, employees, contractors or agents cause , with respect to the Project Site and/or the Riverboat Gaming Project as the result of their inspection or testing hereunder.

 

ARTICLE 10
IMPOSITIONS AND CONTEST

 

10.1         Impositions .           Tenant will pay or cause to be paid, subject to Section 10.5 of this Lease, all current and past due taxes, including but not limited to ad valorem taxes and special assessments which constitute or will constitute if not paid, a lien on the Project Site, the Land Based Project, the leasehold interest created by this Lease, or the “Improvements and Personalty” (defined below) (subject to Sections 3.1.4 and 16.1) (collectively referred to as the “Taxes”) prior to the Taxes being past due, which at any time on or after the. Commencement Date may be assessed, levied, confirmed, imposed upon, and/or become due and payable during the balance, if any, of the Term; provided, however, that if, by law, any Taxes may, at the option of the taxpayer, be paid in installments, Tenant may pay the same in equal installments over the period of time allowed by law, provided, however, that Tenant shall pay all such installments remaining unpaid at the termination of this Lease. It is the intention of the parties that the Land.Based Project, the leasehold interest created by this Lease and the.Improvements and Personalty will be subject to taxation under Missouri law notwithstanding that the land constituting the Project Site is owned by the City.

 

10.2         Furnished Receipts .    Tenant, upon written request of the City, shall furnish to the City, within thirty (30) days after the date of such request, official receipts of payment issued by the appropriate taxing authority, or other evidence of payment satisfactory to the City.

 

10.3          Utilities .    During the Term, Tenant shall be solely responsible for paying for all utilities required for operation of the Riverboat Gaming Project and shall make all payments for or with respect to the same on a timely basis.

 

18



 

10.4          Protection against Lien Claims .    All work on the Land Based Project will be performed by Tenant in such a manner that the Land Based Project will remain free and clear at all times of all liens and encumbrances of any nature except for Taxes not yet due and payable and liens created by persons working under the direction of the City for which payment is not the responsibility of Tenant. Subject to the foregoing, Tenant will promptly pay and discharge all claims and liens in connection with the Land Based Project. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Tenant shall not be liable for any liens or encumbrances for work performed on the Project Site after Tenant relinquishes possession of the Project Site except as provided in this Lease.

 

10.5          Contest of Liens, Laws and Taxes .   Tenant shall have the right, after prior written notice to the City, to contest by appropriate administrative and/or legal proceedings, diligently conducted, in good faith, without cost or expense to the City, unless and to the extent that the City is the defendant to the action that.Tenant brings, the validity or application of any Taxes, Utilities charges, liens or laws (collectively “Impositions” and individually “Imposition”), subject to the following:

 

10.5.1      if, by the terms of any Imposition, compliance therewith pending the prosecution of any such proceeding may legally be delayed without the occurrence of any lien, charge or liability of any kind against the Project Site, the leasehold interest created by this Lease, the Land Based Project or the.Improvements and Personalty, or the operation of the Riverboat Gaming Project, and without subjecting Tenant or the City to any liability, civil or criminal, for failure so to comply therewith, Tenant may delay compliance until the final determination of such proceeding: or

 

10.5.2      if any lien, charge or civil or criminal liability would be incurred by reason of any such delay, Tenant nevertheless may contest as aforesaid and delay as aforesaid, provided that such delay would not subject the City to criminal liability, and Tenant furnishes to the City satisfactory evidence of security to the City against any loss or injury by reason of such contest or delay, if required by the City. If Tenant posts a bond in the amount of the Imposition under contest, Tenant shall be deemed to have provided reasonable security.

 

10.6         City Joinder In Contest .    To the extent legally necessary to enable Tenant to lawfully exercise its rights under this Lease to contest an Imposition, the City shall, at Tenant’s expense, join in any such contest in which the City is not the defendant or adverse party.

 

19



 

ARTICLE 11

TEE CITY’S PERFORMANCE OF TENANT’S COVENANTS

 

11.1          The City’s Right to Perform .    If Tenant fails to pay any Imposition in accordance with this Lease, or to take out, pay for, maintain or deliver any of the insurance policies or certificates as provided for in this Lease, or fails to make any other payment or perform any other act on its part to be made or performed under this Lease, then the City, after written notice to Tenant and Tenant’s failure to cure the same within thirty (30) days after such notice (or immediately without notice or opportunity to cure in the event of an emergency), may (but shall be under no obligation to) (i) pay any Imposition or other charge payable by Tenant pursuant to this Lease, or (ii) take out, pay for and maintain any of the insurance policies provided for in this Lease, or (iii) make any other payment or perform any other act on Tenant’s part to be made or performed under this Lease, and may enter upon the Project Site for any such purpose, and take all such action, as may be necessary. No such payment or performance by the City will waive or release Tenant from its obligation which the City has elected to pay or perform on behalf of Tenant nor waive the City’s right to take such action as may be permissible under this Lease as a result of such default.

 

11.2          Repayment by Tenant . All sums so paid by the City and all costs and expenses incurred by the City (including without limitation fees of attorneys and other professionals) in connection with the performance of any such act, shall bear interest until repaid to the City at the rate of 300 basis points above the prime rate of Boonslick Bank in Boonville, Missouri and shall be paid by Tenant to the City within five (5) days after demand.

 

ARTICLE 12

TERMINATION

 

12.1          Termination Events .

 

12.1.1      The following event “Terminating Events”) shall violate conditions to performance by the City of its obligation under this Lease , and shall constitute the only grounds for the City terminating this Lease: (i) subject to Section 17.5 of this Lease, the failure of Tenant to complete construction of Phase I/II of the Land Based Project no later than April 3, 2001; (ii) subject to Section 13.2.1 of this Lease, the total abandonment of the Land Based Project; (iii)   subject to Section 13.2.1 and Section 17.5 of this Lease, the ceasing of gaming activities at or from the Project Site for a period of more than thirty (30) consecutive days; (iv) the failure of Tenant to keep the public park areas (which include the amphitheater area) open to the public (but subject to such rights of closure as are provided in Section

 

20



 

4.1 of this Lease) after notice and reasonable opportunity to cure; (v) the failure of Tenant to pay the rent required under Section 3.1 of this Lease; (vi) the failure of Tenant to comply with Section 2.5 of the Master Agreement after notice and reasonable opportunity to cure; (vii) the failure of Tenant to operate the Riverboat Gaming Project pursuant to Section 4.1 of this Lease after notice and reasonable opportunity to cure; (viii) the failure of Tenant to maintain insurance as required pursuant to Article 6 of this Lease; (ix) the failure of Tenant to pay any City expenses which are the responsibility of Tenant pursuant to this Lease or the Master Agreement or other monetary amounts which the City advances for the benefit of Tenant (and which the City has the right to advance under the terms of this Lease or the Master Agreement) after notice and reasonable opportunity to cure; (x) the termination of the Master Agreement; or (xi) subject to Section 17.5 of this Lease, the failure of the Opening Date to occur by April 3, 2001.

 

12.1.2      Upon termination of this Lease, all improvements to the Project Site, and all improvements, equipment, fixtures, trade fixtures and personal property (except solely those artifacts, objects of art and similar discreet items which are in good faith merely loaned or made available to Tenant for display at the Riverboat Gaming Project and so designated by written notice to the City within thirty (30) days after such item is first placed upon the Riverboat Gaming Project) constituting the Land Based Project (the “Improvements and Personalty”) shall automatically become the sole and exclusive property of the City. Until the termination of this Lease, the Improvements and Personalty shall be the property of the Tenant. In the event that the Riverboat Gaming Project is constructed in accordance with the Preferred Site Configuration, then the term “Improvements and Personalty” shall include the Riverboat/Floating Facility (but not interior gaming equipment and other personalty located therein, which shall be the property of Tenant in all events and regardless of whether the Riverboat Gaming Project is constructed in accordance with the Preferred Site Configuration or the Alternate Site Configuration) and the Holding Pond. In the event that the Riverboat Gaming Project is constructed in accordance with the Alternate Site Configuration, then the Riverboat/Floating Facility will remain the property of.Tenant and may be removed by Tenant upon the termination of this Lease. During the Term, Tenant will satisfy any liens or encumbrances and prevent, except as otherwise provided in this Lease, any lien or encumbrance from being filed against the Project Site or the Improvements and Personalty other than for ad valorem property taxes and special assessments not yet due and payable, so that the Project Site and the Improvements and Personalty will at all

 

21



 

times during the Term be free and clear of all liens and encumbrances.

 

12.1.3      Tenant agrees that the City shall be entitled to the benefit of all provisions of law respecting the summary recovery of possession of the Project Site. Tenant agrees that if it fails to surrender possession of the Project Site and the Improvements and Personalty, Tenant shall be liable to the City for all damages which the City shall suffer from Tenant’s failure to surrender possession.

 

12.2          Surrender and Delivery of the Project Site . Tenant shall, upon the termination of this Lease, deliver possession of the Project Site and the Improvements and Personalty to the City without delay and in good order, condition and repair, except for reasonable wear and tear, and free and clear of all occupancies, subleases, concessions and licenses, and free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. In the event that the Riverboat Gaming Project is constructed in accordance with the Alternate Site Configuration, then the Riverboat/Floating Facility shall not constitute part of the Land Based Project and shall remain the sole property of Tenant upon termination of this Lease.

 

12.3          Personal Property Not Removed . Tenant shall remove all of Tenant’s personal property which does not constitute the Personalty from the Project Site upon termination of this Lease. Any personal property of Tenant which remains in or on the Project Site after thirty (30) days from the termination of this Lease may, at the option of the City, be deemed to have been abandoned by Tenant and either retained by the City as its property or disposed of in such manner by the City as the City may see fit.

 

12.4          The City Not Responsible . After termination of this Lease, the City shall not be responsible for any loss or damage occurring to any personal property owned by Tenant or any sublessee, licensee or franchisee of Tenant or any of their respective suppliers, customers or invitees.

 

12.5          Restoration . If the Riverboat Gaming Project is constructed in accordance with the Alternate Site Configuration, then following termination of this Lease, Tenant will, if requested in writing by the City within thirty (30) days after this Lease terminates, remove the Holding Pond. If the City does not request removal of the Holding Pond within thirty (30) days after termination of this Lease, the Holding Pond shall become the property of the City.

 

12.6          s urvival . Every obligation of Tenant under this Lease and each Prime Lease which relates to the Riverboat Gaming Project or the occupancy by Tenant of the Project Site, including the Railroad Portion and the DNR Portion, shall survive the termination of this Lease and the applicable Prime Lease and shall not

 

22



 

terminate until such obligation is fully satisfied by Tenant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Tenant shall incur no obligation or liability under either this Lease or any Prime Lease which arises after the termination of this Lease or such Prime Lease, as the case may be, other than obligations or liabilities which result from any action by Tenant, its agents or employees or from the occupancy of the Project Site by Tenant or relate to the period of time that Tenant occupied the Project Site.

 

ARTICLE 13
DEFAULT AND REMEDIES

 

13.1          Default . The following constitute a “Default” under this Lease:

 

13.1.1      Failure to perform or observe any covenant, obligation or agreement of this Lease which failure continues uncured for thirty (30) days after written notice from the City; provided that if such Default is of such a nature that it cannot reasonably be cured within such thirty (30) day period, then so long as Tenant commenced cure efforts within the thirty (30) day period and diligently pursues completion of such cure, the thirty (30) day period will be extended for such period of time as is reasonably necessary to complete such cure.

 

13.1.2      The occurrence of any other event described as constituting a “Default” in the Project Documents, which is not cured within any applicable notice and cure period.

 

13.2          Remedies .

 

13.2.1      If for any reason Tenant abandons the Phase I/II portions of the Land Based Project at any time on or after the date the Acquisition Escrow Account is funded by Tenant in accordance with this Lease Agreement and the Master Agreement, then Tenant shall have the right to attempt to sell its interest in the Riverboat Gaming Project (including but not limited to an assignment of its interest under this Lease) in accordance with the provisions of Section 1.6.2 of the Master Agreement, and in the event of such abandonment, the rights and remedies of Tenant and the City in connection therewith shall be as provided for, and as limited in, Sections 1.6.2, 1.6.3 and 1.6.4 of the Master Agreement.

 

13.2.2      The cessation of gaming activities at or from the Project Site for period of 30 consecutive days or more shall, unless caused by the matters provided for in Section 17.5 of this Lease, be deemed to constitute an abandonment of the Phase I/II portions of the Land Based Project, and in such event the parties shall have the rights and remedies provided for in Section  13.2.1 above; provided,

 

23



 

however, that unless such cessation of gaming activities was a voluntary act by Tenant, Tenant shall have the right to promptly commence such action as may be necessary or appropriate to permit the resumption of gaming activities at or from the Project Site, and so long as Tenant is diligently pursuing such action, the cessation of gaming activities (i) shall not be considered an abandonment of the Phase I/II portions of the Land Based Project, and (ii) shall not permit the City to terminate this Lease in accordance with clause (iii) of Section 12.1.

 

13.2.3      If a Default arises from Tenant’s failure to complete Phase III (other than payment of the Additional Payment) as and when required under the Project Documents, within thirty (30) days after receiving written notice of such Default from the City, Tenant will (i) cure such default, (ii) notify the City in writing that such failure is for reasons beyond . its control, or due to events or circumstances within the scope of Section 17.5 of this Lease, that are then reasonably likely to continue indefinitely, or (iii) notify the City that such failure is due to events or circumstances within the scope of Section 17.5 that are not then likely to continue indefinitely. In the case of clause (ii) above, the City will be entitled to an amount equal to the actual reasonable cost of completion of the uncompleted Project Increment(s), and Tenant will accompany its written notice referred to in clause (ii) above with payment to the City of its estimated cost of completion of such Project Increment(s) (with Tenant remaining obligated to pay the actual reasonable cost thereof, if greater, and the City remaining obligated to refund any excess of such payment over the actual reasonable cost thereof, if lower). In the case of clause (iii) above, so long as Tenant commenced cure efforts within thirty (30) days after receiving written notice of such Default from the City and diligently pursues completion of such cure, the thirty (30) day period will be extended as reasonably necessary to complete such cure. If a Default arises from Tenant’s failure to fully pay the Additional Payment as and when required under the Project Documents, Tenant shall have a period of thirty (30) days after receipt of written notice of such Default from the City to cure such Default.

 

If the City disagrees with the position taken in Tenant’s notice referred to in the foregoing paragraph, then it will within thirty (30) days of receiving such notice so notify Tenant in writing, and, unless the parties otherwise agree, the dispute will be submitted to arbitration in St. Louis, Missouri under the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association. The decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be binding and conclusive on the City and Tenant, and a judgment on the award may be entered by any court having jurisdiction. In addition, if the position taken

 

24



 

by Tenant in its written notice to the City was a s specified in clause (ii) above, then the City’s written notice made pursuant to this paragraph will be accompanied by a return of the payment tendered by Tenant.

 

ARTICLE 14

BANKRUPTCY

 

14.1          Events of Bankruptcy .    The following shall be “Events of Bankruptcy” under this Lease:

 

14.1.1      Tenant’s having been adjudicated insolvent, as that term is defined in 11 U.S.C. § 101, e t . seq . (the “Bankruptcy Code”), or under the insolvency laws of any state, district, commonwealth or territory of the United States (the “Insolvency Laws”);

 

14.1.2      the appointment of a receiver or custodian for all or a substantial portion of Tenant’s property or assets, or the institution of a foreclosure action upon all or a substantial portion of Tenant’s real or personal property;

 

14.1.3      the filing of a voluntary petition by Tenant under the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code or Insolvency Laws;

 

14.1.4      the filing of an involuntary petition against Tenant as the subject debtor under the Bankruptcy Code or Insolvency Laws, which is either not dismissed within sixty (60) days of filing, or results in the issuance of an order for relief against the debtor, whichever is later; or

 

14.1.5      Tenant’s making or consenting to an assignment for the benefit of creditors or a common law composition of creditors.

 

14.2          The City’s Remedies .

 

14.2.1      Termination of Lease .           Upon the occurrence of an Event of Bankruptcy, the City shall have the right to terminate this Lease by giving written notice to Tenant, and Tenant shall be immediately obligated to quit the Project Site. Any other notice to quit, or notice of the City’s intention to reenter, is expressly waived. If the City elects to terminate this Lease, everything contained in this Lease on the part of the City to be done and performed shall cease without prejudice, subject, however, to the right of the City to recover from Tenant all amounts owed up to the time of termination or recovery of possession by the City, whichever is later, and any other monetary damages or losses sustained by the City; provided, however, and notwithstanding the

 

25



 

foregoing or the further remedies set forth in this Section 14.2, the City shall not have the right to terminate this Lease while a case in which Tenant is the subject debtor under the Bankruptcy Code is pending, unless Tenant or its trustee in bankruptcy (the “Trustee”) is unable to comply with the provisions of Sections 14.2.5 of this Lease.

 

14.2.2      Suit for Possession .              Upon termination of this Lease pursuant to Section 14.2.1 of this Lease, the City may proceed to recover possession under and by virtue of the provisions of the laws of Missouri or by such other proceedings, including reentry and possession, as may be applicable.

 

14.2.3      R eletting of Project Site .      Upon termination of this Lease under Section  14.2.1 of this Lease, the City shall have the option to relet the Project Site for such rent and upon such terms, in the City’s sole discretion. The City shall not be liable in any way whatsoever for failure to relet the Project Site or, if the Project Site is relet, for failure to collect the rent under such reletting, and in no event shall Tenant be entitled to receive the excess, if any, of such net rent collected over the sums payable by Tenant to the City under this Lease.

 

14.2.4      Monetary Damages .            Any damage or loss sustained by the City as a result of an Event of Bankruptcy may be recovered by the City in any manner available at law or in equity. However, if Tenant becomes the subject debtor in a case pending under the Bankruptcy Code, the provisions of this Section  14.2.4 may be limited by the limitation of damage provisions of the Bankruptcy Code.

 

14.2.5      Assumption or Assignment by Trustee . If Tenant becomes the subject debtor in a case pending under the Bankruptcy Code, the City’s right to terminate this Lease pursuant to this Article 14 shall be subject to the rights of the Trustee to assume or assign this Lease. The Trustee shall not have the right to assume or assign this Lease unless the Trustee (i) promptly cures all Defaults under this Lease and all other Project Documents (ii) promptly compensates the City for monetary damages which the City has established to the satisfaction of the Bankruptcy Court that it has incurred as a result of such Defaults, (iii) provides “adequate assurance of future performance”, and (iv) complies with Article 15 of this Lease.

 

26



 

ARTICLE 15
ASSIGNMENT/SUBLEASE/ENCUMBRANCE

 

15.1          Assignment, Subletting and Other Transfers .

 

15.1.1       Subject to Sections 15.1.3, 15.1.4 and 15.1.5, Tenant may not assign this Lease, or sublet the Land Based Project, in whole or in part, without the City’s prior written consent (which may not be unreasonably withheld). No such assignment or sublease, even if so consented to, will be effective until the City receives and approves an executed counterpart of such assignment or sublease, in recordable form, under which the assignee assumes all obligations of Tenant under this Lease. This Article 15 shall not be construed to prevent Tenant from assigning its rights pursuant to Section 16 of the Master Agreement provided that Tenant complies with this Article 15. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Tenant may sublease individual premises within buildings that constitute part of the Land Based Project (for example, without limitation, a sublease of a restaurant facility) without the prior consent of the City; provided , however , that each such sublease will terminate upon the expiration or sooner termination of this Lease and will provide that such sublease is subject to all of the terms and conditions of this Lease.

 

15.1.2       Subject to Sections 15.1.3, 15.1.4 and 15.1.5, any transfer, whether voluntary, involuntary or by operation of law, or any issuance by Tenant, of shares of stock or other interests of a proprietary nature in Tenant or its successor which, whether through a transaction or series of transactions, results in the Trusts or their Permitted Transferee(s) (defined below) ceasing to own at least 51% of all of the issued and outstanding shares of stock and other interests of a proprietary nature in Tenant may not occur without the prior written consent of the City (which may not unreasonably be withheld).

 

15.1.3       Notwithstanding Sections 15.1.1 and 15.1.2, it will be unreasonable per se for the City to withhold its consent to a transfer (i) on the ground (whether by itself or together with other factors) that the proposed transferee has insufficient net worth if the proposed transferee has a net worth, immediately prior to the transfer, of at least Ten Million Dollars ($10,000,000) (exclusive of goodwill and other intangible assets if the proposed transferee is not an individual), it being understood that the City may reasonably consent to a transfer to a proposed transferee with a net worth of less than such amount, or (ii) if the proposed transferee is a Necessarily Acceptable Transferee  (defined below), it being understood that the City may reasonably

 

27



 

consent to a transfer to a proposed transferee other than a Necessarily Acceptable Transferee.

 

15.1.3.1    For purposes of this Section 15.1.3, a “Necessarily Acceptable Transferee” means that the proposed transferee satisfies all of the following criteria, as evidenced to the City by such documentation as the City may reasonably request:

 

(a)  the proposed transferee has a net worth, immediately prior to the transfer, of at least Ten Million Dollars ($10,000,000) (exclusive of goodwill and other intangible assets if the proposed transferee is not an individual);

 

(b)  the proposed transferee shall either (i) have proven expertise in the gaming industry of at least five (5) continuous years, or (ii) be a company whose equity interests are directly or indirectly owned 50% or more by a company or individuals with proven expertise in the gaming industry of at least five (5) continuous years;

 

(c)  Tenant shall have in its employ following the transfer a general manager for the Riverboat Gaming Project whose executive officers and other key personnel (as reasonably designated by the City) possess proven expertise in the gaming industry as evidenced by prior business activity of at least five (5) continuous years; and

 

(d)            the proposed transferee has been investigated by the Missouri Gaming Commission and advised in writing that issuance of all permits and licenses necessary in order to lawfully conduct gaming activities at the Project Site in accordance with the terms of this Master Agreement and Master Lease will be forthcoming reasonably contemporaneously with the effective date of the, transfer.

 

15.1.4       Notwithstanding Sections 15.1.1 and 15.1.2, the Trusts may transfer all or a portion of their proprietary interest in Tenant without the City’s consent to, or to a trust for the benefit of, Marvin Davis or a spouse, child or grandchild of Marvin Davis (individually, a “Permitted Transferee” and, collectively, “Permitted Transferees”).

 

15.1.5       Notwithstanding Sections 15.1.1 and 15.1.2, Tenant may transfer its rights under the Project Documents without the City’s consent so long as after giving effect to such transfer the transferee is a corporation, partnership or

 

28



 

limited liability company the proprietary interests of which are at least 51% owned, directly or indirectly, by the Trusts or their Permitted Transferee(s).

 

15.2          Limited Right to Encumber Leasehold Interest . Tenant may, at any time and from time to time during the term of this Lease (subject, however, to the limitations contained in Section 15.2.3), encumber, by deed of trust or mortgage or other security instrument in favor of a Lender who has been approved by the Missouri Gaming Commission (to the extent such approval is required by applicable law) as an acceptable secured lender to Tenant (“Lender”), all of Tenant’s interest under this Lease and the leasehold estate hereby created in Tenant (the “Leasehold Estate”) together with any or all of the other portions of the Riverboat Gaming Project owned by Tenant (such deed of trust, mortgage or other security instrument is referred to in this Lease as a “Leasehold Encumbrance”), strictly in accordance with the terms hereinafter set forth:

 

15.2.1       Any Leasehold Encumbrance shall be subject to all covenants, conditions and restrictions set forth in this Lease and to all rights and interests of the City.

 

15.2.2       Tenant shall give the City no less than twenty (20) days prior written notice of any Leasehold Encumbrance, accompanied by a copy of any and all deeds of trust, mortgages and/or other security instruments evidencing, creating and/or governing the Leasehold Encumbrance (collectively the “Security Instrument”).

 

15.2.3       Any indebtedness secured by a Leasehold Encumbrance must, at the time of creation of such Leasehold Encumbrance, comply with the following:

 

(a)            as long as Tenant is at least 51% owned, directly or indirectly, by beneficiaries of the Trusts, no indebtedness secured by a Leasehold Encumbrance shall have a term which extends (regardless of when the indebtedness is incurred) past the tenth (10th) anniversary of the Opening Date; and

 

(b)            except to the extent such indebtedness is personally guaranteed by any of (i) Marvin Davis, (ii) any or all of the Trusts, or (iii) any individual or entity with a net worth in excess of $10,000,000 (exclusive of goodwill and other intangible assets in the case of an entity), the amount of such indebtedness (i.e., the amount of the unguaranteed portion of such indebtedness) shall not exceed a sum equal to 60% of the fair market value of the Riverboat Gaming Project.

 

29



 

The parties acknowledge that in the event that Tenant desires to expand the geographic area of the Project Site beyond the area contemplated by the Master Agreement or desires to construct additional improvements as a part of the Land Based Project upon the Project Site, and in the event that Tenant and the City mutually agree upon the applicable terms and conditions of such geographic expansion or additional improvements, then the parties will negotiate the prospect of Tenant providing to a Lender a security interest in its interest in this Lease to secure financing for such geographic expansion and/or additional improvements.

 

15.2.4       No Leasehold Encumbrance shall in any way constitute or be construed as a lien or encumbrance on the City’s fee interest in the Project Site or on the City’s reversionary interest in the Improvements or Personalty. The Leasehold Encumbrance may encompass the Improvements and Personalty but only so long as the Leasehold Encumbrance is in effect with respect to this Lease and only so long as the Leasehold Encumbrance recognizes the City’s reversionary interest in the Improvements and Personalty and can not extinguish or affect the City’s rights to receive the Improvements and Personalty upon the termination of this Lease free and clear of any lien or encumbrance. Therefore, any lien or encumbrance on the Improvements or Personalty shall only be permitted if such lien or encumbrance is only a lien on the Improvements and/or Personalty for the duration that the Lender has a lien or encumbrance against Leasehold Estate and does not extinguish the City’s reversionary interest in the Improvements and/or Personalty. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the Lender may also hold liens on the Riverboat/Floating Facility and the other property of Tenant to the extent such property does not constitute the Leasehold Estate or the Improvements or Personalty under this Lease, and Lender shall have the right to realize on such collateral without restriction.

 

15.2.5       The City shall mail to any Lender who has given the City written request for the same accompanied by notice of its address (a “Noticed Lender”), a duplicate copy of any and all notices alleging or asserting the existence of a Default by Tenant under this Lease or the occurrence or existence of any fact, event or circumstance which with the giving of notice or the passage of time, or both, would constitute a Default by Tenant under this Lease (a “Required Lender Notice”). In addition, the City shall use reasonable efforts to mail to any Noticed Lender a duplicate copy of any other notices the City may from time to time give to or serve on Tenant pursuant to or relating to this Lease, but the City

 

30



 

shall have no liability for failure to do so. Any notices or other communications to a Noticed Lender by the City pursuant to this Lease shall be deemed to have been served on or given to Lender three (3) business days after deposit in the United States first class certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed to Lender at the last mailing address for Lender furnished in writing by the Lender to the City.

 

15.2.6       For as long as there is any Leasehold Encumbrance in effect, the City hereby expressly agrees that it will notify a Noticed Lender prior to materially modifying any material term of this Lease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, upon foreclosure or other realization under a Leasehold Encumbrance (including but not limited to by assignment or other transfer in lieu of foreclosure), no Lender or other person which succeeds to the interest of Tenant shall be bound by any amendment to this Lease which has not been consented to by Lender in writing.

 

15.2.7       A Lender with a valid Leasehold Encumbrance shall have the right at any time to:

 

15.2.7.1      do any act or thing required of Tenant under this Lease, and any such act or thing done and performed by Lender shall be as effective to prevent a forfeiture of Tenant’s rights under this Lease as if done by Tenant; and/or

 

15.2.7.2      realize on the security afforded by the Security Instrument by foreclosure proceedings, accepting an assignment in lieu of foreclosure, or other remedy afforded in law or in equity or by the Security Instrument, and to:

 

(a)  transfer, convey or assign the title of Tenant to the Leasehold Estate to any purchaser at any foreclosure sale, whether the foreclosure sale is conducted pursuant to court order or pursuant to a power of sale contained in the Security Instrument, or to an assignee pursuant to an assignment in lieu of foreclosure, provided that in each and any such instance the Lender shall first obtain the prior written consent of the City, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or denied so long as the Lender provides to the City satisfactory evidence that the purchaser, assignee or other acquirer is an “Acceptable Transferee” (defined below), but may otherwise be withheld, denied or conditioned in the sole and absolute unrestricted discretion of the City; and

 

31



 

(b)  itself acquire and succeed to the interest of Tenant under this Lease by virtue of any foreclosure sale, whether the foreclosure sale is conducted pursuant to a court order or pursuant to a power of sale contained in the Security Instrument, or by virtue of an assignment in lieu of foreclosure, provided that the Lender has complied with the provisions of Sections 15.2.11.3 and 15.2.11.5 below, and further provided that thereafter the Lender shall be required to comply with the provisions of Section 15.2.7.2(a) in connection with any subsequent sale, transfer, assignment or other conveyance or disposition of the Leasehold Estate.

 

15.2.8       No Lender under any Leasehold Encumbrance shall be liable to the City as an assignee of this Lease unless and until Lender acquires all rights of Tenant under this Lease through foreclosure, an assignment in lieu of foreclosure, or as a result of some other action or remedy provided by law or by the Security Instrument; provided, however, that in all events, any person or entity acquiring the Leasehold Estate (including Lender if Lender acquires the Leasehold Estate) shall be liable to perform Lessee’s obligations under this Lease during any period, but only during any period, in which that entity or person has ownership of the Leasehold Estate or possession of the Project Site. No sale, assignment,. transfer or other conveyance of the Leasehold Estate by any party who is an assignee, successor in interest or transferee of Lender shall cause any such party to be released from liability under this Lease; provided that Lender shall not be deemed an owner of the Leasehold Estate or to be in possession of the Project Site until Lender acquires all rights of Tenant under the Lease through foreclosure, an assignment in lieu of foreclosure, or as a result of some other action or remedy provided by law or by the Security Instrument.

 

15.2.9       For as long as there is in effect any Leasehold Encumbrance held by a Noticed Lender, the City may not terminate this Lease because of any Terminating Event other than those Terminating Events listed in Sections 12.1.1 (i),(x) or (xi) of this Lease (the Terminating Events listed in clauses (ii) through and including (ix) being referred to as a “Lender-Curable Terminating Event”), unless the City has given to the Noticed Lender a copy of the written notice provided to Tenant declaring the existence of the Lender-Curable Terminating Event and afforded Lender the opportunity after service of the notice to:

 

15.2.9.1      Cure the Lender-Curable Terminating Event within 20 days after expiration of the time period granted to Tenant under this Lease for curing such

 

32



 

Lender-Curable Terminating Event, when the Lender-Curable Terminating Event can be cured by the payment of money to the City or some other person;

 

15.2.9.2       Cure the Lender-Curable Terminating Event within 45 days after expiration of the time period granted to Tenant under this Lease for curing such Lender-Curable Terminating Event, when the Lender-Curable Terminating Event must be cured by something other than the payment of money and can by its nature reasonably be cured within the period of time after service of the notice on Lender and before the expiration of such 30 day period; provided, however, that if the applicable Lender-Curable Terminating Event is of such a nature that, although it can be cured, it cannot be cured within such period, then so long as Lender commences the acts necessary to cure the Lender-Curable Terminating Event within such period and thereafter diligently continues to pursue such cure, then the cure period available to Lender shall be extended for such reasonable period of time as is reasonably necessary in order to permit Lender to complete such cure.

 

15.2.10     Tenant and Lender, jointly and severally agree to reimburse City on demand for the City’s actual costs (including reasonable attorney’s fees), incurred in conjunction with the review, processing and documentation of any assignment, transfer, or other change of ownership of the Leasehold Estate effectuated by or on behalf of Lender or otherwise pursuant to the exercise of rights under the Security Instrument.

 

15.2.11     For purposes of this Section 15.2, the term “Acceptable Transferee” shall mean that the proposed transferee of the Leasehold Estate satisfies each and every one of the following criteria, as evidenced to the City by such documentation as the City shall reasonably request:

 

15.2.11.1     the proposed transferee has a net worth, immediately prior to the transfer, of at least Ten Million Dollars, exclusive of goodwill and other intangible assets;

 

15.2.11.2     the proposed transferee shall (a) be a company either (i) with proven expertise in the gaming industry of at least 5 continuous years, or (ii) whose equity interests are directly or indirectly owned 50% or more by a company which has proven expertise in the gaming industry of at least 5 continuous years, and (b) employ a general manager for the Riverboat Gaming Project whose executive officers and other key personnel (as reasonably designated by the City) possess proven

 

33



 

expertise in the gaming industry as evidenced by prior business activity of at least five continuous years;

 

15.2.11.3     the proposed transferee has been investigated by the Missouri Gaming Commission and advised in writing that issuance of all permits and licenses necessary in order to lawfully conduct gaming activities at the Project Site in accordance with the terms of this Lease will be forthcoming reasonably contemporaneous with the effective date of the transfer of this Lease;

 

15.2.11.4     the proposed transferee agrees to fund, contemporaneous with the effectiveness of the transfer, the entire then unfunded portion of the Acquisition Escrow Account and the Construction Escrow Account, determined as if there was a present obligation to cause (a) the Acquisition Escrow Account to equal the full unpaid acquisition cost of all phases of the Riverboat Gaming Project and/or (b) the Construction Escrow Account to equal the full unpaid costs of the construction (including required renovations) of all phases of the Riverboat Gaming Project; and

 

15.2.11.5     the proposed transferee assumes all of the duties and obligations of Tenant (or its affiliates) under this Lease, the Master Agreement and all other Project Documents and agrees to be bound to the City to observe, perform and/or comply with all of the terms, provisions, conditions, obligations, duties, covenants and agreements at any time to be observed, performed and/or complied with by Tenant (or its affiliates) under each such document as if the transferee were originally a party to the same in the place of Tenant (or its affiliates), all pursuant to documents and/or instruments in form and content as are requested by and acceptable to the City.

 

15.2.12     Any rights of a Lender pursuant to this Section 15.2, including but not limited to the right to realize on the Leasehold Estate created hereunder, may be exercised by an affiliate or by a nominee on behalf of such Lender.

 

15.2.13     If this Lease is terminated or is proposed to be terminated for any reason, by the City or Tenant (including, but not limited to, any rejection of this Lease in a bankruptcy proceeding), then as soon as the City learns of such termination or proposed termination, the City will immediately notify Lender of such termination or proposed termination (a “Termination Notice”), which notice will set forth any sums or other performance due to the City under this Lease, and upon the written request of Lender, the City will

 

34



 

enter into a new lease for the Project Site with Lender or its designee (a “Lender Tenant”) for the remainder of the term of this Lease, upon the terms, provision, covenants and agreements set forth in this Lease, with such amendments thereto as may have been theretofore approved in writing by Lender, provided:

 

15.2.13.1     Such Lender Tenant will request the City for such a new lease within thirty (30) days after the date of its receipt of the Termination Notice.

 

15.2.13.2     Such Lender Tenant will pay to the City, at the time of the execution and delivery of said new lease, on or about the date such Lender Tenant acquires the right to ‘lease the Project Site (which may be subject to delay by operation of any stay in any proceedings involving the reorganization or insolvency of Tenant), any and all sums then due under this Lease but for such termination.

 

15.2.13.3     Such Lender Tenant will, upon execution, and delivery of said new lease, perform and observe all the other covenants and conditions on Tenant’s part to be performed and observed to the extent that Tenant will have failed to perform and observe the same, except that (i) with respect to any breach or default which cannot be cured by such Lender Tenant until it obtains possession of the Project Site, said Lender Tenant will have a reasonable time after said Lender Tenant obtains possession to cure such breach or default, and (ii) in no event will any Lender or Lender Tenant be required to. cure a breach or default relating to the bankruptcy or insolvency of Tenant or any other breach or default of Tenant which is not susceptible of being cured by a Lender Tenant.

 

ARTICLE 16

COVENANTS

 

16.1          Covenants By the City . The City represents, warrants and covenants to Tenant and its permitted assigns (i) a covenant of quiet enjoyment for any action taken by or through the City and with the further limitation that the City shall in no way be liable for title defects associated with title prior to the City receiving title to the Project Site; (ii) that this Lease is valid, binding upon and enforceable against the City in accordance with its terms; (iii) that upon execution of this Lease, the City will provide Tenant with an opinion of its legal counsel that this Lease is valid, binding upon and enforceable against the City in accordance with its terms; and (iv) during the term of this Lease, the City shall not assess or charge Tenant for utilities, tap-in rights, hook-ups, refuge pick-up or any other charge for City services or

 

35



 

City owned services which are not consistent with the charges charged to any other business in the City nor shall it impose any docking fees of any nature or description on Tenant.

 

16.2          Covenants By Tenant .   Tenant represents, warrants and covenants to the City as follows:

 

16.2.1       Enforceability .   This Lease is valid, binding upon and enforceable against Tenant in accordance with its terms.

 

16.2.2       Power and Authority . Tenant is a corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under Nevada law, and is authorized to do business as a foreign corporation in, and is in good standing under the laws of, Missouri. Tenant has the full authority and power to enter into this Lease, to execute and deliver this Lease and to perform and observe all the terms, conditions and provisions of this Lease to be so observed and performed by Tenant. The execution and delivery of this Lease by Tenant has been duly authorized by all necessary action on its part. Tenant shall provide to the City a certified copy of its resolution authorizing the execution and delivery of this Lease.

 

16.2.3       No Conflicts . Except as otherwise provided in this Lease, nothing in this Lease agreed to by Tenant or its officers, members and directors, will conflict with or result in a breach of the terms and provisions of any contract or agreement to which Tenant, its officers, members or directors, are a party or by which Tenant, its officers, members or directors otherwise are bound, or to the best knowledge of Tenant will violate any existing law, rule, regulation, order of any court or governmental authority having jurisdiction over or otherwise affecting Tenant, its officers, members or directors.

 

16.2.4       Financial Condition . Tenant is not a party to any assignment for the benefits of its creditors or any bankruptcy proceedings, and the transactions contemplated in this Lease shall not cause Tenant to become insolvent or otherwise unable to pay its debts as the same become due.

 

16.2.5       No Contract Defaults .          Except as otherwise provided in this Lease, Tenant is not in default under the terms or conditions of any contract or agreement to which it is a party, which materially and adversely affects its ability to perform its obligations under this Lease.

 

16.2.6       No Litigation . Except as otherwise provided in this Lease, to the best knowledge of Tenant, there are no claims, suits or other proceedings threatened or pending against Tenant which materially and adversely affect its ability to perform its obligations under this Lease.

 

36



 

16.2.7    Opinion of Counsel . Tenant shall provide to the City an opinion of counsel stating that Tenant has the requisite power and authority to enter into this Lease, the party executing this Lease on behalf of Tenant has been duly authorized to do so and that this Lease is valid, binding upon and enforceable against Tenant in accordance with its terms. Further, the opinion of counsel shall state that based upon the facts known to counsel but without further investigation or inquiry that this Lease does not violate any existing law, rule, regulation, order of any court or governmental authority having jurisdiction over or otherwise affecting Tenant, its officers or directors

 

ARTICLE 17

GENERAL PROVISIONS

 

17.1       Notices .   Any notice or other communication required, permitted, or contemplated by this Lease (a “Notice”) must be in writing and may be given by a nationally recognized overnight courier service (e.g. Federal Express, Airborne, etc.), United States Mail, registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, personal delivery with executed receipt or facsimile with verification and followed by United States Mail, registered or certified mail, return receipt requested. Such Notice shall be deemed to have been duly given, delivered or served; (i) if and when personally delivered or sent by verifiable facsimile on the date so delivered or sent, or (ii) three (3) days after being mailed by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, or (iii) one (1) day if sent by a nationally recognized overnight courier delivery service for next day delivery, costs prepaid, addresses to:

 

The City:

 

City of Boonville

 

 

Attn:   City Administrator

 

 

525 East Spring Street

 

 

Boonville, Missouri 65233-1658

 

 

Telephone:   (816) 882-2332

 

 

Telecopier:    (816) 882-6608

 

 

 

With copies to:

 

Paul M. Wooldridge, Esq.

 

 

312 Main Street

 

 

Boonville, Missouri 65233

 

 

Telephone:    (816) 882-3447

 

 

Telecopier:    (816) 882-2542

 

 

 

And with copies to:

 

King Hershey Coleman Koch & Stone

 

 

2345 Grand Boulevard, Suite 2100

 

 

Kansas City, Missouri 64108

 

 

Attn:       Douglas S. Stone

 

 

Telephone:   (816) 842-3636

 

 

Telecopier:   (816) 842-2414

 

37



 

Tenant:

 

c/o The Davis Companies

 

 

2121 Avenue of the Stars

 

 

Suite 2800

 

 

Los Angeles, California 90067

 

 

Attn: Michael Colleran

 

 

Telephone:   (310) 551-1470

 

 

Telecopier:   (310) 286-9359

 

 

 

With copies to:

 

Katten, Muchin & Zavis

 

 

525 West Monroe Street

 

 

Suite 1600

 

 

Chicago, Illinois 60661

 

 

Attn: David Bryant

 

 

Telephone:   (312) 902-5200

 

 

Telecopier:   (312) 902-1061

 

Notice given in any other manner will be deemed delivered when actually received by the party to whom the notice is addressed. Any party may change its address by giving the other parties ten (10) days advance written notice of such change.

 

17.2         Police Power Limitation . Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in the Project Documents with respect to the City’s obligations, the City’s obligations under the Project Documents shall not be construed to require the City to surrender or waive its police powers or contract away any of its governmental functions in violation of Missouri law. The parties intend the City’s obligations under the Project Documents shall be interpreted and construed in light of the inherent limitations placed upon the City as a municipal corporation which requires it to retain such powers and does not permit the City to contract away those powers that are exclusively a legislative prerogative.

 

17.3         Failure to Perform By the City . The City shall not be deemed to be in default in the performance of any of its obligations under this Lease unless the City’s failure to perform such obligation continues for a period of thirty (30) days after written notice to the City specifying the nature of such non-performance, provided that if such failure to perform is of such a nature that it cannot reasonably be cured within such thirty (30) day period, then so long as the City commenced cure efforts within the thirty (30) day period and diligently pursues completion of such cure, the thirty (30) day period will be extended for such period of time as is reasonably necessary to complete such cure. Tenant shall have no right to terminate this Lease for any default or non-performance by the City under this Lease, except by operation of law in the event Tenant becomes owner of fee simple title to all or any part of the Project Site, nor any right to offset.

 

17.4         No Liability . Tenant shall not assert or seek to enforce any claim for breach of this Lease against any of the assets of the

 

38



 

City other than the City’s interest in the Project Site for the satisfaction of any liability or claim against the City under this Lease. Tenant agrees to look solely to such interests for the satisfaction of any liability or claim against the City under this Lease. It is specifically agreed that in no event whatsoever shall the City, or any of its officers, officials, servants or agents, ever be personally liable for any such liability, except, with respect to the City only, as expressly set forth in the first two sentences of this Section.

 

17.5         Force Majeure .   If either Tenant or the City are delayed, hindered in or prevented from the performance of any act required under this Lease by. reason of weather, fire, acts of God, strikes, lock-outs, inability to procure materials, failure of power, riots, insurrection, war, litigation which is being pursued or defended by Tenant, or the failure of another party to this Lease to perform an act required of it which is required in order for the party who was prevented from acting to act and/or other matters beyond the reasonable control of the party who is to act, then performance of such act shall be excused for the period of the delay and the period for the performance of any such act shall be extended for a period equivalent to the period of such delay.

 

17.6         Certificates .   Either party will at any time and without charge, within ten (10) days after written request by the other, certify by written instrument as to: whether this Lease has been supplemented or amended, or if so, in what manner; the validity of this Lease as of the time the request is received; the existence of any Default by either party and any offsets, counterclaims or defenses on the part of the other party; the Commencement and Expiration Dates; and such other matters as might be reasonably requested. Such certification may be delivered to any person specified in the certificate.

 

17.7         Waiver of Jury Trial and counterclaims . The City and Tenant waive trial by jury in any action, proceeding or counterclaim brought by either of the parties against the other in connection with any matter whatsoever arising out of or in any way connected with this Lease, Tenant’s use or occupancy of the Project Site, any claim of injury or damage or the landlord-tenant relationship between the parties. Tenant expressly waives the right to impose any counterclaims in any action or proceeding in which the City seeks possession of the Project Site and/or the Improvements and Personalty, except solely those counterclaims which but for such imposition would, pursuant to applicable law or rules of court, be forever barred.

 

17.8         Binding Effect . This Lease will be binding upon the parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns.

 

17.9         No Joint Venture Or Partnership . Under no circumstances shall the Project Documents or any actions of the parties in

 

39



 

furtherance of the Project Documents be construed to create either a partnership or a joint venture between the City and Tenant, the existence of the same being specifically denied.

 

17.10       Attorneys Fees . If any party institutes litigation to enforce its rights under or relating to a breach of this Lease, the prevailing party will be entitled to recover from the other party reasonable attorneys’ fees and court costs.

 

17.11       Governing Law . This Lease will be construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Missouri, excluding its conflict of law provision.

 

17.12        Amendments . This Lease together with the Project Documents constitute the complete and exclusive statement of the agreement between the parties with respect to the development of the Riverboat, Gaming Project.

 

17.13       Entire Agreement The Project Documents supersede all prior written and oral statements, representations, communications of any type, covenants, conditions, warranties and/or presentations with respect to the development of the Riverboat Gaming Project and no representation, statement, communication of any type, condition, warranty or presentation not contained in the Project Documents shall be binding on the parties or have any force or effect whatsoever. This Lease may not be amended or modified except by a written instrument signed by both the City and Tenant.

 

17.14       Multiple Originals . This Lease may be executed in multiple original counterparts. Each counterpart will be deemed an original, and when the counterparts are taken together, they will be deemed to be one and the same instrument.

 

17.15       Severability . If any provision of this Lease or its application to any person or circumstances is to any extent held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the remainder of this Lease, or the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances, will not be affected, and each provision of this Lease will be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.

 

17.16       Interpretation . Where required for proper interpretation, words in the singular will include the plural, and words of any gender will include all genders. The descriptive headings of the articles and sections of this Lease are for convenience only and will not control or affect the meaning or construction of any of the provisions of this Lease.

 

17.17       Waiver . No waiver by any party of any of its rights or remedies under this Lease will be considered a waiver of any other or subsequent right or remedy. No waiver by any party of any

 

40



 

of its rights or remedies under this Lease will be effective unless evidenced by a written instrument executed by the waiving party.

 

17.18       Memorandum of Lease .  At any time and from time to time, at the request of either party, the parties shall execute, deliver and record, at Tenant’s expense, a Memorandum of Lease with respect to this Lease.

 

EXECUTED as of the date first above written.

 

 

 

“THE CITY”

 

 

 

 

 

THE CITY OF BOONVILLE, MISSOURI

[SEAL]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ATTEST:

 

By:

/s/ Bernard Kempf

 

 

 

Bernard Kempf, Mayor

/s/ [ILLEGIBLE]

 

 

 

City Clerk

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ [ILLEGIBLE]

 

 

 

City Counselor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“TENANT”

 

 

 

 

 

 

DAVIS GAMING BOONVILLE, INC.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ Michael Colleran

 

 

 

Michael Colleran, President

 

41


Exhibit 10.41

 

AMENDMENT TO MASTER LEASE
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF BOONVILLE, MISSOURI
AND
DAVIS GAMING BOONVILLE, INC.

 

THIS AMENDMENT TO MASTER LEASE, is made on April 19 th , 1999, by the City of Boonville, Missouri, a Missouri third class city (the “City”) and Davis Gaming Boonville, Inc. (f/k/a/ Gold River’s Boonville Resort, Inc.) a Nevada Corporation (“Tenant”).

 

The City and Tenant entered into a Master Lease dated July 18, 1997 (the “Master Lease”).

 

Attached to the Master Lease as Exhibit B was the legal description of the Project Site, as that term is defined in the Master Lease, as of the date of the Master Lease. The Master Lease contained a provision providing that “As additional parcels become part of the Project Site, the legal description of such parcels will be added to Exhibit B.”

 

NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the sum of ten dollars and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the City and the Tenant agree as follows:

 

1.             The Master Lease is hereby amended by deleting its attached “Exhibit B” and substituting therefor “Exhibit B” which is attached to this Amendment (“New Exhibit B”). From and after the date of the Amendment, the term “Project Site” as used throughout the Master Lease shall be deemed to mean that property described in the New Exhibit B.

 

2.             Tenant acknowledges that the City’s portion of the Project Site described at Paragraph 44 of the New Exhibit B is a leasehold interest arising out of a lease the term of which may expire prior to the expiration of the Master Lease. Accordingly, as to that portion of the Project Site, the term of the Master Lease shall expire contemporaneous with the expiration of the City’s leasehold therein.

 

3.             The parties shall execute, deliver and record, at Tenant’s expense, an Amended and Restated Memorandum of Lease reflecting the amendments made pursuant to this Amendment to Master Lease.

 



 

4.             Except as herein provided, the provisions of the Master Lease shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

 

EXECUTED as of the date first above written.

 

 

“THE CITY”

 

THE CITY OF BOONVILLE, MISSOURI

 

 

[SEAL]

 

 

 

ATTEST:

By:

/s/ Bernard Kempf

 

 

Bernard Kempf, Mayor

[ILLEGIBLE]

 

 

City Clerk

 

 

 

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY

 

 

 

[ILLEGIBLE]

 

 

City Counselor

 

 

 

 

 

 

“TENANT”

 

DAVIS GAMING BOONVIL LE, INC.

 

 

 

By:

/s/ Michael Colleran

 

    Michael Colleran, President

 

 

STATE OF MISSOURI

)

 

 

) SS.

 

COUNTY OF COOPER

)

 

 

BE IT REMEMBERED that on this 18th day of May, 1999, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the county and state aforesaid, personally appeared Bernard Kempf, to me personally known who being by me duly sworn did say that he is the Mayor of the City of Boonville, Missouri, a third class city duly existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Missouri, and that the seal affixed to

 

2


Exhibit 10.42

 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO MASTER LEASE

 

THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO MASTER LEASE (“Second Amendment”) is made on Sept. 17, 2001, by the City of Boonville, Missouri, a Missouri third class city (the “City”), and IOC – Boonville, Inc., formerly known as Davis Gaming Boonville, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Tenant”).

 

The City and the Tenant entered into a Master Lease dated , July 18, 1997, which was amended by the amendment to the Master Lease dated April 19, 1999 (the First Amendment and the Master Lease, as amended by the First Amendment, shall be referred to as the “Master Lease”).

 

Attached to the Master Lease as Exhibit B is the legal description of the Project Site, as that term is defined in the Master Lease, as of the date of the Master Lease. The Master Lease contains a provision providing that “As additional parcels become part of the Project Site, the legal description of such parcels will be added to Exhibit B.”

 

The Tenant and the City wish to add certain parcels (legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto) to Exhibit B and the City and the Tenant wish to set forth in this Second Amendment the terms and conditions for adding these parcels.

 

NOW, THEREFORE , for and in consideration of the sum of ten dollars and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the City and the Tenant agree as follows:

 

1.    The land described on Exhibit A is added to the Project Site.

 

2.   The Master Lease is further amended by deleting the attached “Exhibit B” that was provided pursuant to the First Amendment and substituting therefor the Second Revised Exhibit B which is attached to this Amendment (“Second Revised Exhibit B”). From and after the date of the Second Amendment, the term “Project Site” as used throughout the Master Lease shall be deemed to mean that real property described in the Second Revised Exhibit B.

 

3.   The Master Lease is further amended by adding section 16.2.8, which shall state: “The Real Property described in paragraphs 44 and 45 of Exhibit A (“Remediation Sites”) has been subject to remediation and, as evidenced by a Certificate of Completion issued by the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (“MDNR”) and a letter dated March 20, 2001, from MDNR (“MDNR Documents”), no additional investigation and remedial action is Currently required.”

 

4.   The Tenant represents and warrants that, to the best of Tenant’s knowledge based upon the MDNR Documents all necessary remediation has been accomplished with respect to the Remediation Sites, that all of the costs of MDNR incurred in the oversight of the remediation (referenced in the letter of MDNR, dated June 21, 2001, to the Tenant) have been paid in full and

 



 

that, to the best of Tenant’s knowledge based upon the MDNR Documents, no Hazardous Materials (as that term is defined in the Master Lease) are present on the Remediation Sites. The Tenant reaffirms that it will fulfill all of the terms and conditions of the Master Lease with respect to the Remediation Sites including, but not limited to, Section 9.2 of the Master Lease.

 

5.             The parties shall execute, deliver and record, at the Tenant’s expense, an Amended and Restated Memorandum of Lease reflecting the amendments made pursuant to this Second Amendment.

 

6.             Except as herein provided, the provisions of the Master Lease shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

 

EXECUTED as of the date first above written.

 

 

“THE CITY”

 

 

 

THE CITY OF BOONVILLE, MISSOURI

[SEAL]

 

 

 

ATTEST:

By:

/s/ Bernard Kempf

 

 

Bernard Kempf, Mayor

 

 

[Illegible]

 

 

City Clerk

 

 

 

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY

 

 

 

[Illegible]

 

 

City Counselor

 

 

“TENANT”

 

 

 

IOC – BOONVILLE INC.

 

 

 

By:

/s/ John M. Gallaway

 

 

John M. Gallaway, President

 

2


Exhibit 10.43

 

THIRD AMENDMENT TO MASTER LEASE

 

THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO MASTER LEASE (“Third Amendment”) is made as of November 19, 2001, by the City of Boonville , Missouri, a Missouri third class city (the “City”), and IOC – Boonville, Inc., formerly known as Gold River’s Boonville Resort, Inc., and Davis Gaming Boonville, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Tenant”).

 

The City and the Tenant entered into a Master Lease dated July 18, 1997, which was amended by the Amendment to the Master Lease dated April 19, 1999, and which was further amended by the Second Amendment to Master Lease dated September 17, 2001 (the Master Lease, as amended by the First Amendment and the Second Amendment, shall be referred to as the “Master Lease”).

 

Attached to the Master Lease as Exhibit B is the legal description of the “Project Site,” as that term is defined in the Master Lease, as of the date of the Master Lease. The Master Lease contains a provision providing that “As additional parcels become part of the Project Site, the legal description of such parcels will be added to Exhibit B.”

 

The Tenant and the City wish to add certain parcels and make other adjustments to the Project Site and thus need to modify Exhibit B to the Master Lease as set forth below.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the City and the Tenant agree as follows:

 

1.            The Master Lease is amended by deleting “Exhibit B” and substituting therefor the Third Revised Exhibit B which is attached to this Third Amendment (the “Third Revised Exhibit B”). The term “Project Site” and references to “Exhibit B” as used throughout the Master Lease shall mean that real property described in the Third Revised Exhibit B.

 

2.            The portion of the Project Site that is described in Lease Agreement No. CPR9702 between the City and the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (“MDNR”), dated July 1, 1998, as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated as of November 19, 2001, is owned by MDNR and leased by the City. Therefore, as to that portion of the Project Site, the Master Lease constitutes a sublease with the City as sublandlord and Tenant as subtenant that will terminate upon termination of Lease Agreement No. CPR9702. This paragraph replaces Paragraph 2 of the Amendment to Master Lease, dated April 19, 1999.

 

3.            The parties shall execute, deliver and record, at the Tenant’s expense, a Third Amended and Restated Memorandum of Lease reflecting the amendments made pursuant to this Third Amendment.

 



 

4.                Except as herein provided, the provisions of the Master Lease shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

 

EXECUTED as of the date first above written.

 

 

“THE CITY”

[SEAL]

 

 

THE CITY OF BOONVILLE, MISSOURI

ATTEST:

 

 

By:

/s/ Bernard Kempf

[ILLEGIBLE]

 

 

Bernard Kempf, Mayor

City Clerk

 

 

 

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY

 

 

 

[ILLEGIBLE]

 

 

City Counselor

 

 

 

“TENANT”

 

 

 

IOC – BOONVILLE, INC.

 

 

 

By:

/s/ Rexford A. Yeisley

 

Name:

  Rexford A. Yeisley

 

Title:

  Senior Vice President, CFO, Treasurer

 

2


Exhibit 10.44

 

ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT
(Lease Agreement)

 

THIS ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 6 th   day of June, 2000, by and among (i) HILTON HOTELS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, and FLAMINGO HILTON RIVERBOAT CASINO, L.P., a Missouri limited partnership and assignee by assignment from Hilton Hotels Corporation (collectively, “ Assignor ”), (ii) ISLE OF CAPRI CASINOS, INC., a Delaware corporation (“ Assignee ”), and (iii) IOC-KANSAS CITY, INC., a Missouri corporation and affiliate of Assignee (“ Operating Ass igne e ”).

 

Recitals

 

A.          The Port Authority of Kansas City, Missouri (the Port Authority ”) and Hilton Hotels Corporation (“ HHC ”) are parties to an Amended and Restated Lease Agreement dated as of August 21, 1995, as thereafter amended (the “ Lease ”), a true, correct and complete copy of which is attached as Schedule A hereto.

 

B.           The interest of HHC under the Lease Agreement was assigned (i) pursuant to that certain Lessee’s Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated August 9, 1996 by and between HHC and Hilton Kansas City Corporation, a Missouri corporation (“ HKCC ”), whereby HHC transferred all its right, title, and interest in and to the Lease to HKCC; and (ii) pursuant to that certain Blanket Conveyance, Bill of Sale, and Assignment and Assumption Agreement dated August 9, 1996 by and between HKCC and Flamingo Hilton Riverboat Casino, L.P. (“ Flamingo Hilton ”), whereby HKCC transferred all its right, title, and interest in and to the Lease to Flamingo Hilton.

 

C.           Assignor now desires to assign and transfer all right, title and interest in the Lease to Assignee, while remaining liable for any and all liabilities and obligations previously accrued or hereafter accruing pursuant to the Lease.

 

D.          Assignee desires to accept such assignment, and thereafter to assign and transfer to Operating Assignee all right, title and interest in the Lease held by Assignee

 

Agreement

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above premises, the mutual covenants and agreements stated herein and stated in the Asset Sale Agreement dated as of February 8, 2000, by and among Assignor, as sellers, and Assignee and Operating Assignee, as purchasers (the “ Asset Sale Agreement ”), as well as other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

 

1.             Assignment .         Effective upon (a) the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Asset Sale Agreement, (b) the execution of the Consent (as defined below), and (c) the issuance of a license by the Missouri Gaming Commission to Operating Assignee to conduct gaming operations on the property which is subject to the Lease (collectively, the “Closing”), Assignor does hereby irrevocably assign, transfer, sell, deliver and convey unto Assignee, its successors and assigns, all of Assignor’s right, title and interest in and to the Lease,

 



 

as of the close of business on the day on which the Closing occurs, free and clear of any lien, charge, claim or encumbrance, except as set forth on Schedule B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Subject to and upon the occurrence of the Closing, Assignee hereby accepts the assignment of the Lease pursuant to the terms of this Assignment and Assumption Agreement. The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that this Assignment (and Assumption Agreement shall not become effective and shall be of no legal force or effect unless and until the Closing occurs.

 

2.              Assumption of Liabilities .

 

(a)           Assignee hereby assumes responsibility to faithfully and punctually perform, satisfy and discharge all of the duties, obligations, terms, conditions, covenants and liabilities arising or accruing after the date of the Closing that Assignor is otherwise bound to perform, discharge or otherwise satisfy under the Lease, including without limitation, pursuant to Section 18.04 (B) (viii) (b) and (c) of the Lease regarding (i) the use of the “Demised Premises” (as that term is defined in the Lease) in accordance with the restrictions set forth in the Lease and (ii) the payment of “Rent” (as that term is defined in the Lease). Assignor does hereby agree to indemnify, defend and hold Assignee harmless from any loss (including without limitation attorneys’ fees and costs), claim or cause of action arising or accruing under or in connection with any of the following: (i) the Lease based upon events, acts or omissions that occurred on or before the date of the Closing; (ii) any future written assignments executed and delivered by and between Assignor and Assignee based upon events, acts or omissions that occurred on or before the date of the Closing; or (iii) the failure of Assignor to perform its obligations under this Assignment and Assumption Agreement. Assignee does hereby agree to indemnify, defend and hold Assignor harmless from any loss (including without limitation attorneys’ fees and costs), claim or cause of action arising or accruing under or in connection with any of the following: (i) the Lease based upon events, acts or omissions that occurred after the date of the Closing; (ii) any future written assignments executed and delivered by and between Assignee and Assignor based upon events, acts or omissions that occurred after the date of the Closing; or (iii) the failure of Assignee or Operating Assignee to perform their respective obligations under this Assignment and Assumption Agreement.

 

(b)            Notwithstanding any other provision of this Assignment and Assumption Agreement to the contrary, Assignor shall remain liable to the Port Authority in connection with the performance of all liabilities and obligations under the Lease to the same extent as if this Assignment and Assumption Agreement had not been executed. The foregoing sentence does not, however, in any way relieve (i) Assignee or Operating Assignee from the liabilities and obligations that each owes to Assignor which are set forth in this Assignment and Assumption Agreement or (ii) Assignor from the liabilities and obligations that it owes to Assignee and Operating Assignee which are set forth in this Assignment and Assumption Agreement.

 

3.              Further Assignment to Operating Subsidiary of Assignee

 

(a)           Subject to the occurrence of the Closing, Assignee does hereby irrevocably assign, transfer, sell, deliver and convey unto Operating Assignee, its successors and assigns, all its right, title and interest in and to the Lease, as of the close of business on the day the Closing occurs, free and clear of any lien, charge, claim or encumbrance, except asset forth on Schedule B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Subject to and upon the

 

2



 

occurrence of the Closing, Operating Assignee hereby accepts the assignment of the Lease pursuant to the terms of this Assignment and Assumption Agreement.

 

(b)           Assignor hereby acknowledges and consents to the assignment, transfer, sale, delivery and conveyance by Assignee to Operating Assignee of all right, title and interest in the Lease that has been assigned to Assignee pursuant to Section 1 of this Assignment and Assumption Agreement.

 

(c)           Operating Assignee hereby assumes responsibility to faithfully and punctually perform, satisfy and discharge all of the duties, obligations, terms, conditions, covenants and liabilities arising or accruing after the date of the Closing that Assignee is otherwise bound to perform, discharge or otherwise satisfy under the Lease (as a result of the terms and conditions of this Assignment and Assumption Agreement), including without limitation, pursuant to Section 18.04 (B) (viii) (b) and (c) of the Lease regarding (i) the use of the “Demised Premises” (as that term is defined in the Lease) in accordance with the restrictions set forth in the Lease and (ii) the payment of the “Rent” (as that term is defined in the Lease). Assignor does hereby agree to indemnify, defend and hold Operating Assignee harmless from any loss (including without limitation attorneys’ fees and costs), claim or cause of action arising or accruing under or in connection with any of the following: (i) the Lease based upon events, acts or omissions that occurred on and before the date of the Closing; (ii) any future written assignments executed and delivered by and between Assignor and Assignee based upon events, acts or omissions that occurred on or before the date of the Closing; or (iii) the failure of Assignor to perform its obligations under this Assignment and Assumption Agreement. Operating Assignee does hereby agree to indemnify, defend and hold Assignor harmless from any loss (including without limitation attorneys’ fees and costs), claim or cause of action arising or accruing under or in connection with any of the following: (i) the Lease based upon events, acts or omissions that occurred after the date of the Closing; (ii) any future written assignments by and between Operating Assignee and Assignor based upon events, acts or omissions that occurred after the date of the Closing; or (iii) the failure of Operating Assignee or Assignee to perform their respective obligations under this Assignment and Assumption Agreement.

 

(d)           Notwithstanding any other provision of this Assignment and Assumption Agreement to the contrary, Assignee shall remain liable to the Port Authority and Assignor in connection with the performance of all liabilities and obligations under the Lease to the same extent as if the further assignment pursuant to this Section 3 had not been made. The foregoing sentence does not, however, in any way relieve (i) Assignor from the liabilities and obligations that it owes to Assignee and Operating Assignee which are set forth in this Assignment and Assumption Agreement or (ii) Assignee or Operating Assignee from the liabilities and obligations that each owe to Assignor which are set forth in this Assignment and Assumption Agreement.

 

3



 

4.              Representations, Warranties and Covenants of Assignor .

 

(a)            Assignor, as of the date of the Closing, does hereby represent and warrant to Assignee and Operating Assignee as follows:

 

(i)             Assignor has complete and unrestricted power and authority to sell, assign, and transfer all its right, title and interest in the Lease as contemplated by this Assignment and Assumption Agreement, and such sale; assignment and transfer does not and will not require the consent or approval of any third party or government entity, except for the prior written consent of the Port Authority, which written consent is set forth in the Acknowledgment, Consent and Estoppel Certificate (the “Consent”) attached hereto as Exhibit 1 and incorporated herein by reference.

 

(ii)           Neither the execution and delivery of this Assignment and Assumption Agreement nor compliance with the terms hereof on the part of Assignor will violate the Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws, or the Certificate of Limited Partnership or Partnership Agreement, as the case may be, of Assignor, breach any governmental law, statute or regulation, or conflict with or result in the breach of any of the terms, conditions or provisions of any agreement or instrument to which Assignor is a party or by which it is or may be bound, or constitute a default thereunder, or result in the creation or imposition of any lien, claim, charge, or encumbrance. Except as set forth in Schedule C attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, Assignor has no knowledge of any fact or condition regarding or involving the Demised Premises (as defined in the Lease) or any of Assignor’s duties and obligations under the Lease that constitute a violation or breach of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, order, contract or other agreement including, without limitation, environmental laws and regulations.

 

(iii)          Assignor has all necessary corporate power and authority to enter into this Assignment and Assumption Agreement, and has taken all corporate action necessary to make this Assignment and Assumption Agreement enforceable upon Assignor in accordance with its terms.

 

(iv)          A true, correct and complete copy of the Lease , and all amendments thereto, are attached hereto as Schedule A. The Lease has not been amended or modified, except as set forth on Schedule A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The Lease, as amended or modified, is in full force and effect and constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligation of all of the parties thereto and is enforceable in accordance with its terms.

 

(v)           Except as set forth in Schedule D attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, no event has occurred and no condition exists that, with the giving of notice or the lapse of time or both, could constitute a default by Assignor under the Lease or, to Assignor’s best knowledge after due and diligent inquiry, by the Port Authority. Assignor has no present intention to bring an action or otherwise attempt to enforce any alleged nonperformance or breach of

 

4



 

any provision of the Lease Except as set forth in Schedule E attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, Assignor has no existing defenses or offsets against the enforcement of the Lease by the Port Authority, and knows of no other parties who are not signatories to the Lease who possess or may assert rights under or in connection with the Lease.

 

(vi)          Except as set forth in Schedule F attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, the Lease and the Development Agreement dated as of March 12, 1993 by and between the Port Authority and HHC (the Development Agreement”), as thereafter amended, are the only agreements, written or oral, entered into between the Port Authority and Assignor.

 

(b)           Assignor covenants and agrees as follows:

 

(i)            Assignor has not and will not assign the whole or any part of its right, title and interest hereby assigned to any person other than Assignee.

 

(ii)           Assignor shall forthwith notify Assignee and Operating Assignee in writing of any default (or any event or occurrence that, but for the giving of notice or the passage of time, or both, would constitute a default) under the Lease of which it has knowledge or any assertion made to Assignor by any other party to the Lease that circumstances have arisen that may pen-nit or result in a breach or the cancellation of the Lease.

 

5.              Representations and Warranties of Assignee.

 

(a)            Assignee, as of the date of the Closing, does hereby represent and warrant to Assignor as follows:

 

(i)            Assignee has complete and unrestricted power and authority to sell, assign, and transfer its right, title and interest in the Lease as contemplated by this Assignment and Assumption Agreement.

 

(ii)           Neither the execution and delivery of this Assignment and Assumption Agreement nor compliance with the terms hereof on the part of Assignee will violate the Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws of Assignee, breach any governmental law, statute or regulation, or conflict with or result in the breach of any of the terms, conditions or provisions of any agreement or instrument to which Assignee is a party or by which it is or may be bound, or constitute a default thereunder, or result in the creation or imposition of any lien, claim, charge or encumbrance.

 

(iii)          Assignee has all necessary corporate power and authority to enter into this Assignment and Assumption Agreement and has taken all corporate action necessary to make this Assignment and Assumption Agreement enforceable upon Assignee in accordance with its terms.

 

(b)            Assignee covenants and agrees that Assignee will not assign the whole or any part of its right, title and interest hereby assigned to any person or entity other than

 

5



 

Operating Assignee, without the prior written consent of the Port Authority and Assignor, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Assignor acknowledges and agrees that, for purposes of this subsection (b) of this Section 5, consent shall be deemed “unreasonably withheld” if the proposed assignee, in the Assignor’s reasonable opinion, is financially capable of performing and satisfying in full each of its respective obligations pursuant to the Lease and Assignor withholds its consent.

 

6.              Representations and Warranties of Operating Assignee . Operating Assignee, as of the date of the Closing, does hereby represent and warrant to the Assignor as follows:

 

(a)           Neither the execution and delivery of this Assignment and Assumption Agreement nor compliance with the terms hereof on the part of Operating Assignee will violate the Articles of Organization or Operating Agreement of Operating Assignee, breach any governmental law, statute or regulation, or conflict with or result in the breach of any of the terms, conditions or provisions of any agreement or instrument to which Operating Assignee is a party or by which it is or may be bound, or constitute a default thereunder, or result in the creation or imposition of any lien, claim, charge or encumbrance.

 

(b)           Operating Assignee has all necessary corporate power and authority to enter into this Assignment and Assumption Agreement, and has taken all corporate action necessary to make this Assignment and Assumption Agreement enforceable upon Operating Assignee in accordance with its terms.

 

7.              Further Action .

 

(a)           Assignor, Assignee and Operating Assignee agree that each shall execute and deliver, or cause to be executed and delivered from time to time, such instruments, documents, agreements, consents and assurances and take such other action as the other parties reasonably may require to more effectively assign and transfer to and vest in such parties the rights and assets assigned hereunder. Assignor, Assignee and Operating Assignee agree to promptly remit and send to such parties any and all payments, funds, assets, notices, reports and other documents and information received by each party, its agents or representatives as a direct or indirect result of its rights in, or with respect to, the Lease.

 

(b)           If any right or asset hereby assigned or transferred shall for any reason be nonassignable or not enforceable by Assignee or Operating Assignee, Assignor shall take such action to enforce the same or to obtain the benefits thereof for Assignee and/or Operating Assignee as Assignee or Operating Assignee may reasonably direct, but at the sole expense and risk of Assignee and Operating Assignee, and Assignor will deliver to Operating Assignee any amounts received by it on account of any such claim, right or chose in action after deducting any reasonable expenses incurred by Assignor in taking such action that have not been paid or reimbursed by Assignee or Operating Assignee

 

8.              General .

 

(a)           This Assignment and Assumption Agreement cancels and supersedes all previous agreements (other than the Asset Sale Agreement) relating to the subject matter of this Assignment and Assumption Agreement, written or oral, between the parties hereto and, together with the relevant provisions of the Asset Sale Agreement, contains the entire understanding of

 

6



 

the parties hereto and shall not be amended, modified or supplemented in any manner whatsoever except as otherwise provided herein or in writing signed by each of the parties hereto.

 

(b)           Neither this Assignment and Assumption Agreement, nor any of the rights, duties or obligations of Assignor hereunder, may be assigned either voluntarily or by operation of law or otherwise delegated by Assignor without the prior written consent of the Assignee and Operating Assignee, and any attempted assignment that is not in conformity herewith shall be null and void. This Assignment and Assumption Agreement shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, and be enforceable by, the parties hereto and their respective successors and permitted assigns.

 

(c)           This Assignment and A ssumption Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and all of which shall constitute one agreement which is binding upon all the parties hereto, notwithstanding that all parties are not signatories to the same counterpart.

 

(d)           Any notice, request, consent or communication under this Assignment and Assumption Agreement shall be effective only if it is in writing and personally delivered or sent by (i) certified mail, postage prepaid, (ii) nationally recognized express delivery service with delivery confirmed or (iii) telexed or telecopies with receipt confirmed, addressed as follows:

 

If to Assignor:

 

Name :

 

 

With Copy To :

 

 

 

Flamingo Hilton Riverboat Casino, L.P.

 

Park Place Entertainment Corp.

c/o Hilton Hotels Corporation

 

3930 Howard Hughes Pkwy.

9336 Civic Center Drive

 

Las Vegas, NV 89109

B everly Hills, CA 90210

 

ATTN: Clive S. Cummis

ATTN: Thomas E. Gallagher

 

Executive Vice President and

Executive Vice President,

 

General Counsel

General Counsel and Secretary

 

FAX: 702-699-5107

FAX: 310-205-7677

 

and to

 

 

Scott LaPorta

 

 

Executive Vice President and

 

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

FAX: 702-699-5190

 

7



 

If to Assignee:

 

Name :

 

 

 

Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc.

 

2200 Corporate Blvd, N.W., Suite 310

 

Boca Raton, FL 33431

 

ATTN:

Allan Solomon

 

Executive Vice President and General Counsel

 

FAX: 561-995-6665

 

If to Operating Assignee:

 

Name :

 

 

 

 

 

IOC-KANSAS CITY, INC.

 

 

C/o Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc.

 

 

2200 Corporate Blvd., N.W., Suite 310

 

 

Boca Raton, FL 33431

 

 

ATTN:

Allan Solomon

 

 

Executive Vice President and General Counsel

 

 

FAX: 561-995-6665

 

 

or such other persons and/or addresses as shall be furnished in writing by any such party, and shall be deemed to have been given as of the date so personally delivered or received.

 

(e)                                   This Assignment and Assumption Agreement and all rights and obligations of the parties hereunder shall be governed by, and construed and interpreted in accordance with, the laws of the State of Missouri applicable to agreements made and to be performed entirely within such State, including all matters of enforcement, validity and performance.

 

(f)                                     Assignor, Assignee and Operating Assignee acknowledge and agree that the provisions set forth in the Consent pertaining or otherwise applicable to Assignor, Assignee and/or Operating Assignee, as the case may be, are true and correct and will be relied upon by the Port Authority in executing and delivering the Consent, and Assignor, Assignee and Operating Assignee agree to be bound by such applicable provisions of the Consent.

 

(g)                                  Assignor, Assignee and Operating Assignee acknowledge and agree that the Port Authority shall be a third party beneficiary of this Assignment and Assumption Agreement, and shall have the right to enforce any such terms and conditions hereof in such capacity.

 

8



 

SIGNATURE PAGE TO
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT
(Lease Agreement)

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have each caused this Assignment and Assumption Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.

 

 

ASSIGNOR:

 

 

 

HILTON HOTELS CORPORATION

 

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ Matthew J. Hart

 

Print Name:

Matthew J. Hart

 

Title:

Executive Vice President and

 

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

9



 

SIGNATURE PAGE TO
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT
(Lease Agreement)

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have each caused this Assignment and Assumption Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.

 

 

FLAMINGO HILTON RIVERBOAT

 

CASINO, L.P.

 

 

 

By: Hilton Kansas City Corp., General Partner

 

 

 

 

 

By:

  /s/ Wallace R. Barr

 

Print Name:

  Wallace R. Barr

 

Title:

  President and Secretary

 

10



 

SIGNATURE PAGE TO
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT
(Lease Agreement)

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have each caused this Assignment and Assumption Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.

 

 

ASSIGNEE:

 

 

 

ISLE OF CAPRI CASINOS, INC.

 

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ Allan B. Solomon

 

Print Name:

 

Allan B. Solomon

 

Title:

 

Exec. Vice President

 

11



 

SIGNATURE PAGE TO
ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT
(Lease Agreement)

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have each caused this Assignment and Assumption Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.

 

 

OPERATING ASSIGNEE:

 

 

 

IOC-KANSAS CITY, INC.

 

 

 

By:

/s/ Allan B. Solomon

 

Print Name:

 

Allan B. Solomon

 

Title:

 

Exec. Vice President

 

12


Exhibit 10.45

 

LEASE AND AGREEMENT-SPRING 1995
(Lower Lots)

 

This Lease and Agreement-Spring 1995 Lower Lots (hereinafter “Agreement”) is made this 15th day of August, 1995 between the Andrianakos Limited Liability Company, a Colorado Limited Liability Company, the Lessor, and Anchor Coin, Inc. d/b/a Colorado Central Station Casino, Inc., the Lessee.

 

WHEREAS, the parties hereto are also parties to the following lease, which concerns a portion of property, which is the subject hereof:

 

Renewed Vacant Ground Lease for Parking Lot Purposes (Lower Lot), dated August 19, 1994, recorded at Book 568, Page 291, Gilpin County Clerk and Recorder’s Office (hereinafter “Lower Lot Lease”); and,

 

WHEREAS, the Lower Lot Lease has expired, but by action of the parties has become a month to month lease, and the parties mutually wish to revise, restate its terms and enter into this new Agreement, which completely replaces and supersedes the terms, covenants, agreements, and all other elements of the aforesaid Lower Lot Lease in all respects; and,

 

WHEREAS, the parties also wish to address the lease of additional property, which has not heretofore been the subject of any lease agreement between them.

 

NOW THEREFORE BE IT AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

 

A.            LEASE

 

A-1.     Property Description . The following described property is the subject of this Agreement (hereinafter collectively “The Property”). The specific description of The Property is set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein. A map of The Property is attached hereto as Exhibit B. The Property which is the subject of this Agreement may include, by virtue of the Option set forth in paragraph A-6 hereinafter, any land acquired or developed by the Lessor, or its individual members, within Black Hawk, Colorado during the term of this Agreement or any renewal thereof.

 

A-2.     Term and Rental Rates . The Lessee shall have and hold The Property from the date hereof to and until twelve o’clock noon on the date of June 1, 2004, at and for a rental rate beginning One Hundred Eighty (180) days after the date hereof of One Hundred Thousand Three Hundred Forty Dollars ($100,340.00) per month, payable monthly on or before twelve o’clock noon on the first day of each calendar month during said term at the office of the Lessor as set forth below without notice. The foregoing base rental rate may be increased by operation of the provisions of paragraph B-5 hereinafter. Prior to One Hundred Eighty (180) days from the date hereof the rental rate shall be Thirty Thousand Dollars ($30,000.00) per month.

 



 

A-3.     Renewals. This Agreement may be renewed at Lessee’s sole option for up to eighteen (18) additional terms of five (5) years each. Renewal shall be automatic for each term unless Lessee gives its notice of non-renewal not less than six months prior to the end of any term.

 

A-4.     Possible Termination of Renewal Rights . The parties hereto are also parties to that certain Spring 1995 - Amended and Restated Vacant Ground Lease for Parking Lot Purposes and Agreement (Upper Lot) (hereinafter “Upper Lot Lease”), of even date herewith. The Upper Lot Lease itself contains renewal provisions. In order for the Lessee to effect the renewal provisions of this Agreement during the primary term or any automatic renewal of the Upper Lot Lease, the Upper Lot Lease must either, 1) be in effect as of the date of any renewal exercise; or, 2) the Lessee must have at least offered to renew the Upper Lot Lease pursuant to the terms of paragraph A-3 thereof. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if Lessee does not renew or terminates the Upper Lot Lease for reasons beyond its control, including but not limited to the discovery of hazardous substance or acts of God making the property unusable, the Lessee may continue to effect any renewal provisions of this Agreement.

 

A-5.     Rental Rate Indexing . At one year intervals beginning June 1, 1996, the rental rate paid to Lessee will be indexed to correspond to any rise or fall in the cost of living. Any increase or decrease in rental rate will be limited to a three percent (3%) difference from the previous year’s rate. The parties agree to use the Consumer Price. Index figures for the Denver/Boulder Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area released by the U.S. Department of Commerce, or its successor, most recently preceding the June first of the subject year to determine any change of the cost of living.

 

A-6.     Option . In the event the Andrianakos Limited Liability Company, or its individual members, develops or purchases additional property in Black Hawk, Colorado, which would be suitable for either parking lot or building purposes, they will offer to the Lessee a first option to immediately lease, for the remaining term of this Agreement and any renewals, that property for either parking lot or building purposes. Lessee must exercise any option by Thirty (30) days from the date it is notified by Lessor that any additional property is available. If Lessee does not exercise its option regarding any particular addition parcel of land, said option will be forever lost concerning such particular additional parcel.

 

A-7.     Cancellation . Lessee, at its sole option, shall have the right to cancel this Agreement in the event that, 1) casino style garbing equivalent or greater to that presently allowed is legalized within a Sixty (60) mile radius of the present Black Hawk City Hall; or, 2) the provisions allowing casino style gaming equivalent to that presently allowed are repealed or restricted in any way. Any such cancellation will require Six (6) months notice to Lessor. In the event of such cancellation, Lessee’s interest in The Property will be transferred to the Lessor in good operating condition with all obligations paid through the cancellation date, and the Lessor will refund Lessee’s deposit.

 

2



 

Moreover, this Agreement will become null and void and of no further effect between the parties.

 

A-8.     Lessee’s Possible Construction . It is specifically agreed the Lessee has the right, during the term of this Agreement or any renewal, to place, build, erect and maintain structures upon any portion of The Property. Such structures may include, but are not limited to, gaming casinos. Any and all costs for any and all structures will be the Lessee’s. Any and all permits or licenses necessary for any and all structures will be obtained by the Lessee. Any and all construction upon The Property must meet all zoning and building requirements and standards. Lessee agrees that it will not allow any liens or encumbrances to attach to The Property as the result of any construction. Lessee further agrees to allow Lessor access to any construction site for the purpose of Lessor posting notices to that affect. The Lessee acknowledges that upon termination of this Agreement any structures upon The Property will remain with The Property and become property of the Lessor. The Lessor will not be required to pay or compensate Lessee for any structures and Lessee acknowledges and assumes all cost risk associated with construction of any structures upon the leasehold estate which is the subject of this Agreement. Lessee agrees to transfer its interest in any structures upon The Property to Lessor upon termination of this Agreement for any reason. Lessor agrees to accept without any further cost to Lessee, any structures upon The Property transferred upon termination as long as they are in good condition.

 

A-9.     Previous Lease Superseded . The Lower Lot Lease and all other previous agreements between the parties concerning any portion of The Property are entirely replaced and superseded in all respects by this Agreement.

 

B.             ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS

 

B-1.      Deposits . Both parties acknowledge that a deposit of Twelve Thousand Dollars ($12,000.00) was paid by the Lessee to the Lessor pursuant to the Lower Lot Lease the Lessor will continue to hold this deposit without interest. Upon Lessee’s faithful performance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and any renewal, the Lessor will return said deposit, without interest, to Lessee upon Lessor’s inspection of The Property, all of which must occur within Sixty (60) days of the termination of this Agreement or any renewal.

 

B-2.      Excavation and Wall Construction . Lessee, at its sole cost, agrees to complete, all necessary excavation and installation of necessary retaining walls, as may be needed for Lessee’s use of any portion of The Property. The Lessee will be allowed One Hundred Eighty (180) days from the date hereof as a construction period for these activities, during which time the rental rate will be reduced as set forth in paragraph A-2 above. After expiration of the One Hundred Eighty (180) day construction period, the rental rate shall increase as set forth in paragraph A-2 notwithstanding whether the activities have been completed. If after completion of these activities, and due to

 

3



 

reasons beyond the Lessee’s control, the full amount of The Property is not available for Lessee’s use, the Lessee may reduce the amount of any rent payable by prorating the amount of the land available to that contemplated by the above-stated property description. Land not available because of its use for set back requirements and subjacent support will not reduce the amount of The Property.

 

B-3.      Taxes/Parking Fees . The rent hereinabove set forth for all of The Property is the total rent for the term of this Agreement. Lessor is not entitled to any royalty or any other percentage payments. No additional changes shall be made for Lessor’s insurance, taxes or other assessments associated with The Property except those listed in this paragraph. During 1996 Lessee will pay when due one-half of the property taxes assessed upon The Property for the year 1995. Beginning in the year 1997 and thereafter for the term of this Agreement or any renewal, Lessee will pay when due all property taxes assessed upon The Property for the preceding year, including those taxes assessed for any improvements made by Lessee, except for any taxes in any way associated with the cost of any street, sidewalk, curb, gutter, street lighting or drainage improvements done independently or at the behest of the City of Black Hawk. These property tax payments described will continue through those taxes, or proportionate part thereof, assessed for the final year, or proportionate part thereof, of the leasehold. Lessee will also be responsible directly to the City of Black Hawk, for that City’s private lot parking fee, if any, during the term of this Agreement. Said fee is currently four dollars ($4.00) per parking space per day.

 

B-4.      Permits and Zoning . Lessor represents and warrants no “Federal 404 Permits” are presently required for use of The Property for surface parking lot purposes. Lessor further represents it is currently processing any City of Black Hawk permits or zoning requests necessary from use of The Property for surface parking lot purposes. Lessee will be responsible for obtaining any other zoning changes or permits needed to use The Property for other purposes. Lessor will provide reasonable cooperation in obtaining any such permits as necessary. If the Lessee is not successful in obtaining only those City of Black Hawk permits and zoning considerations necessary to use The Property for surface parking lot purposes within Sixty (60) days of the date hereof Lessee at its sole discretion may either terminate this Agreement without further costs or accept Lessor’s indemnification for any losses suffered by Lessee as a result of not having said permits and zoning considerations.

 

B-5.      Warranties and Title Matters . Lessor warrants and represents that marketable title to The Property and Lessor’s right to rent The Property to Lessee is encumbered and restricted by only the following:

 

1) That portion of The Property composed of land within Lots 1 through 12, are encumbered by certain documents related to a loan to Lessor made by the Bank of Cherry Creek (“Bank”). Those documents (hereinafter collectively “Security Documents”) include:

 

4



 

a)      A Promissory Note dated March 31, 1995 from the Bank to the Andrianakos Partnership (“A-P’ship”);

 

b)    A Deed of Trust dated March 31, 1995 granted by the A-P’ship, recorded at Book 579, Page 22 in the Gilpin County Colorado records;

 

c)     An Assignment of Rents and Leases dated March 31, 1995 from the A-P’ship to the Bank, recorded at Book 579, Page 26 in the Gilpin County Colorado records;

 

d)    A Security Agreement dated March 31, 1995 from the A-P’ship to the Bank; and

 

e)     UCC Financing Statements from the A-P’ship securing the Bank, recorded at reception no. 952025364 of the Colorado Secretary of States office, reception no. 9500037938 of the Denver County, Colorado records, and Book 579, Page 94 of the Gilpin County Colorado records.

 

2) The need to resolve the following requirements:

 

a)     Deeds or legal proceeding disposing of any interest of Horace Humphrey, Jr., Robinson Reduction Co, William C. Fullerton, and Albert Rogers;

 

b)    Deeds or legal proceedings disposing of the reservations contained in the patents to the City of Black Hawk, recorded May 13, 1874, Book 56, Page 555, and July 21, 1877, Book 62, Page 456;

 

e)     Deeds or legal proceedings disposing of any right of third parties in and to any roadway crossing lots 1-4, Block 50, City of Black Hawk, as shown on land survey plat made by Glenn A. True, recorded in the office of the City Clerk and Recorder of Gilpin County, file no. 5-93-3;

 

d)    Deeds or legal proceedings disposing of the right-of-way across a portion of The Property for the benefit of the Big Spring Mine as reserved in the Deed from Horace Humphrey to Horace Humphrey, Jr., recorded at Book 72, Page 525, and subsequent Deeds; and

 

e)     Deeds or legal proceedings disposing of the right-of-way across a portion of The Property for the benefit of the Running Load Mine,

 

5



 

as reserved in Deed from H.E. Humphrey to William B. Willard recorded Book 112, Page 157, and subsequent Deeds.

 

3) Lots 5, 6, and 7, Block 50 of The Property are encumbered by mineral rights reservations appearing in deeds from Arthur T. Dollaghan and Rosemary J. Dooley, and Elizabeth L. Callahan recorded at Book 579, Page 19 and 20.

 

4) The need to resolve the following requirements:

 

a)     Miner’s Mesa Road encroaches upon the East Nine (9) to Eleven (11) feet of Lot 12, Block 50, and a small segment of Parcel B described in Exhibit A extending South from its boundary with said Lot 12.

 

b)    Clarification that a One Hundred (100) foot easement across the entire width of the Thomas Kelly mining claim exists pursuant to that certain deed recorded October 2, 1992, Book 532, Page 376, but does not encroach upon The Property.

 

5) The need to resolve the following requirements:

 

a)     An undefined easement and right-of-way for various purposes exists in favor of Western Diversified Builders, Inc. pursuant to an instrument recorded May 1, 1995 at Book 580, Page 161.

 

b)    Encroachment by a roadway easement in favor of Western Diversified Builders, Inc., pursuant to an instrument recorded October 2, 1992, Book 532, Page 382.

 

c)     Encroachment by a roadway easement in favor of Western Diversified Builders, Inc., pursuant to an instrument recorded January 6, 1995, Book 575, Page 165.

 

6) Any differences in the description of the common boundary of The Property on the North with Main Street, Black Hawk as set forth in those Boundary Agreements recorded April 4, 1995 at Book 579, Pages 30 and 48.

 

7) Any encumbrances related to that portion of The Property composed of the Gabriel Spalti mining claim, including but not limited to any claim of ownership by Houston Mining Company.

 

6



 

Regarding subparagraph 1), Lessor and its individual members represent they have no other obligations owed to the Bank except those evidenced by the Security Documents. The Lessor and its individual members further agree they will not request or obtain any further advances from the Bank pursuant to the Security Documents. Lessor also acknowledges it has conveyed to Lessee an assignment of Lessor’s rights to cure any of its defaults under the Security Documents, said assignment to be exercised at Lessee’s sole discretion. In the event Lessee undertakes any cure, all costs associated with said cure, including but not limited to any money paid to the beneficiary of the Security Documents, may be set off against any rental payment due Lessor under this Agreement.

 

Regarding the resolution of the requirements set forth in subparagraph 2), Lessor agrees to promptly undertake and make substantial progress toward completion within one year, the resolution of these requirements. Lessee at its sole option may either assist Lessor in these undertakings, or take the lead role in their prosecution. If the parties are unable to complete any necessary undertakings within a reasonable period, Lessee at its sole option may cancel this Agreement. In any event, until such time as the requirements have been satisfied, Lessor agrees to indemnify Lessee for any costs Lessee may reasonably incure in any attempt to satisfy these requirements. Any losses Lessor incurs as a result of non-satisfaction of these requirements, may be set off against any rental payment owed Lessee.

 

Regarding the reservations set forth in subparagraph 3), The Lessee agrees to except these reservations from the overall requirements to deliver marketable unencumbered title.

 

Regarding the encroachment and easement described in subparagraph 4), the Lessee agrees to except this encroachment and easement from the overall requirements to deliver marketable unencumbered title if Lessee, with Lessor’s good faith cooperation, within Sixty (60) days from the date hereof, is successful in obtaining from the City of Black Hawk a waiver or variance from any set back requirements along the Eastern edge of the portion of The Property described in subparagraph 4) a) or other considerations, plus a relinquishment of the City’s easement rights concerning portions of The Property. If, despite its best efforts, Lessee is not able to obtain the set back waiver/variance, or other acceptable considerations, then a prorate reduction in the rental rate will occur based upon the proration of The Property needed for any set back requirements to The Property as a whole. Moreover, if despite its best efforts, Lessee is not able to obtain relinquishment of the City’s easement, the Lessee, at its sole option may either cancel this Agreement or reduce future rental payments based upon the ratio of the area encumbered bears to the entire area of The Property.

 

Regarding the undefined easement and right-of-way and encroachments described in subparagraph 5), the Lessee, with Lessor’s good faith cooperation, agrees to seek a satisfactory definition and limitation thereof. If, despite Lessee’s best efforts, the Lessee

 

7



 

is unsuccessful in obtaining the necessary definition and-limitation within Sixty (60) days of the date hereof, the Lessee, at its sole option may either cancel this Agreement or accept Lessor’s indemnification for any losses suffered by Lessee as the result of not obtaining the subject definition and restriction.

 

Regarding the differences in the description of the common boundary of The Property with Main Street described in subparagraph 6), the Lessee, with Lessor’s good faith cooperation, will resolve such differences by obtaining from the City of Black Hawk any necessary correction deed. If, despite Lessee’s best efforts, the Lessee is unsuccessful in obtaining the necessary correction deed within Sixty (60) days of the date hereof, the parties will jointly determine if the lack thereof affects Lessee’s use of The Property under this Agreement. If the parties determine there is an adverse affect suffered by the Lessee, any such adverse affect will be compensated by an appropriate reduction in future rental payments.

 

Regarding any circumstances described in subparagraph 7), the Lessor, at its sole cost, shall resolve the same to Lessee’s good faith satisfaction within sixty (60) days of the date hereof. If the encumbrances are not resolved within said sixty (60) days Lessee may, at its discretion, cancel this Agreement, prorate future rental payments based upon the ratio of The Property so encumbered to The Property described in Exhibit A, or accept Lessor’s indemnification for any costs reasonably incurred by Lessee as a result of not resolving the encumbrance.

 

After conclusion of all undertakings necessary to remove the encumbrances described in subparagraphs 2), 4), 5), 6) and 7), Lessor agrees to thereafter maintain marketable unencumbered title sufficient to allow Lessee’s use as herein described, including those possible activities discussed in paragraph A-8 above, throughout the term of this Agreement and any extension thereof. Lessor further agrees to provide Lessee prior to execution of this Agreement an up-to-date title commitment, in the amount of One Million, Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,200,000.00), showing marketable title to The Property in the Andrianakos Limited Liability Company except for the encumbrances listed in subparagraph 1), 2), 3), 4), 5), 6) and 7). As part of the closing associated with the execution of this Agreement Lessor will furnish all requirements specified in said title commitment. Lessor agrees that during the term of this Agreement or any renewal, it may not use The Property for any collateral or security purposes if said use would in any way interfere, encumber, or proport to be superior to Lessee’s use and enjoyment of the leasehold which is the subject of this Agreement.

 

The parties recognize the portion of Lot 1, Block 50 which is West of the Eastern Twenty (20) feet described as part of The Property is the subject of a quiet title action pending in Gilpin County, District Court, which action was initiated by the Lessor. If Lessor, within One (1) year of the date hereof can deliver Lessee marketable unencumbered title to said westerly portion of Lot 1, Lessee at its sole option may agree to add said land to this Agreement. If the said land is added to this Agreement, the

 

8



 

base rental rate set forth in paragraph A-3 herein above will be increased in proportion to the ratio of the size of said westerly portion of Lot 1 bear to The Property as described in Exhibit A.

 

B-6.                  CORPS or EPA Permits . Lessor represents and warrants that other than possible request for a drainage easement upon Lot 12 no U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and/or U.S. Environmental Protection Agency permits or permissions are required before The Property may be used as contemplated by this Agreement. However, if other permits or permission are necessary in the future for use of The Property as contemplated by this Agreement, which necessity is not the result of Lessee’s actions, it will be the Lessor’s responsibility to obtain the same. All rental payments to Lessor will be abated during the time it takes for the Lessor to obtain any such necessary permits or permission. Lessor will retain any causes of action it may have against any third party resulting from such situation.

 

B-7.                  Grading and Finishing . The parties recognize that the portion of The Property which was the subject of the Lower Lot Lease is graded and surfaced for use as a parking lot. The parties further acknowledge that the remaining portion of The Property have not been graded for parking lot purposes. Therefore, the Lessee, at Lessee’s sole cost, agrees that if it uses The Property for surface parking purposes it will be responsible for excavating the remaining portion of The Property to a five (5%) percent grade. Thereafter, the Lessee, at its sole cost, shall complete the finish grading (finish grading defined as no more than plus or minus one-tenth of a foot), pave and provide necessary drainage facilities, signage, painting, lighting, fencing, parking lot attendant and storage structures as deemed necessary by the Lessee for the remaining portion of The Property. The parties further recognize that the City of Black Hawk or other regulatory agency may require a retaining wall to be built behind the remaining portion of The Property. The construction of any retaining wall or walls will be done by the Lessee at the Lessee’s sole cost. Any such finished wall or walls must be approved by any and all regulatory agencies, including the City of Black Hawk and deemed acceptable by the Lessee’s insurance company, in the exercise of their good faith discretion.

 

B-8.                  Relocation of Historical House . The parties recognize that an old house exists on The Property. This house will be moved to a new site and relocated to other property by the Lessor at its sole cost. Any restoration of the old house itself, if any is done, will be paid by the Lessor. Notwithstanding any movement of the house, the house shall remain the property of Lessor who shall be responsible therefore. If Lessor, for reasons beyond its control, is unable to move the old house off of The Property, and the Lessee requests, the parties agree to renegotiate this Agreement as necessary to aleviate any adverse effects upon the Lessee’s use of The Property.

 

B-9.                  Hazardous Substances . The Lessor represents it has obtained soil reports showing the absence of contamination upon The Property. Nevertheless, the

 

9



 

parties recognize The Property is located in an area that was the site of mining activities and that other parcels of property in the area have been the subject of EPA Superfund actions or otherwise may be the location of hazardous substances. If any hazardous substances, as such term is defined in § 101(14) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 96-01(14), are found at any time at The Property, Lessor will be given four (4) months to correct the situation, then if the situation is not corrected, Lessee, at its option, may terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part, and vacate the affected land. If Lessee is unable to use The Property, all rental payments will be abated during any cure period of up to four (4) months. Upon any termination, any improvements made upon the land will remain but the Lessee will be without any further responsibility for any payment of rent or other performance under this Agreement for the pro rata portion of The Property so affected.

 

B-10.            Utilities/Services . Lessee shall be responsible and hold the Lessor harmless for the costs, including installation, of any and all utility services requested by Lessee regarding The Property. This provision includes, without limitation, electricity, telephone, trash removal, water and sanitary sewage, including portable toilet facilities.

 

B-11.            Proof of Liability Insurance . Lessee shall furnish Lessor with proof of Lessee’s liability insurance coverage for its operations on The Property at six (6) month intervals. Lessor will also be made an additionally named insured. If Lessee fails to provide a periodic proof of coverage, it will have thirty (30) days from the receipt of such notice from Lessor to provide said proof. The minimum coverage shall be: 1) from the Lessee itself - garagekeepers $250,000.00 and general liability $1,000,000.00 on The Property and any improvements; and, 2) from Lessee’s valet service - garage liability $1,000,000.00.

 

B-12.            Compliance with Law . Lessee agrees not to use The Property for any purpose prohibited by the laws of the United States, Colorado or the Ordinances of the City of Black Hawk. Lessee further agrees to keep sidewalks in front of and around The Property, and The Property itself, free from ice and snow, litter, dirt, debris, and other obstructions and to keep them clean and in a sanitary condition as required by applicable laws and regulations.

 

B-13.            Damage to Property . In the event The Property becomes untenable due to damage by flood, earthquake, landslide or acts of God, which acts are not caused by the Lessee, and the Lessor is unable to affect a repair thereof within Three (3) months of the date of any such occurrence, this Agreement may be thereupon terminated, in whole or in part, by the Lessee and the Lessee will have no further responsibility for payment or rent or other performance under this Agreement or affected portion thereof. All rental payments to the Lessor for the affected portion of The Property will be abated during the time it takes Lessor to repair.

 

B-14.            Eminent Domain . In the event The Property, or any part thereof, is acquired by the exercise of the power of eminent domain, or pursuant to an agreement

 

10



 

in lieu of the exercise of the power of eminent domain, the rental and all other obligations and conditions under the Agreement shall be abrogated for that part of the land acquired, but on that part of the land that is not pro rated said rents, obligations and conditions shall remain in force and of full effect. These rents and other obligations and conditions continuing, however, until the occupancy is surrendered to the acquiring party. The Lessee, however, shall be entitled to share in the award or settlement for compensation and damages for the diminished value of that part of the leasehold that was not acquired. The Lessee shall be entitled in said award or settlement to all compensation for any improvements it constructed on The Property. The Lessor shall be entitled in said award or settlement to compensation for the land, both leasehold and remainder, that are acquired or were threatened to be acquired and for the diminished value of that part of the remainder which was not acquired. The parties realize in the event of the threat of or the exercise of the power of eminent domain, it may be necessary to obtain separate appraisals to determine the Lessor’s and Lessee’s interests, after the value of the parcel as a whole has been determined.

 

B-15.            Access . The Lessor will be permitted reasonable access to The Property for inspection purposes during normal business hours (8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding holidays) except for any access necessitated by an emergency.

 

B-16.            Notices . Any and all notices, demands or other communications required or desired to be given under the provisions of this Agreement shall be given in writing, delivered personally, sent by registered or certified mail return receipt requested postage prepaid, or by telefax addressed as follows:

 

 

LESSEE:

Anchor Gaming

 

 

815 Pilot Road, Suite G

 

 

Las Vegas, Nevada 89119

 

 

Attention:  General Manager, Gaming Operations

 

 

 

 

 

Telefax:    (702) 896-6221

 

 

Telephone:  (702) 896-7568

 

 

 

 

LESSOR:

Andrianakos Limited Liability Company

 

 

7472 South Odessa Circle

 

 

Aurora, Colorado 80016

 

 

 

 

 

Telephone:  (303) 680-1804

 

11



 

 

 

with a copy to:

 

 

 

 

 

Andrianakos Limited Liability Company

 

 

c/o 1790 30th Street, Suite 305

 

 

Boulder, Colorado 80301

 

 

Attention: Dennis L. Blewitt, Esq.

 

 

 

 

 

Telefax:  (303) 444-6349

 

 

Telephone: (303) 449-8772

 

or such other address as either party may designate from time to time by written notice to the other party. Notice shall be effective upon transmission.

 

B-17.            Waiver of Breach . The waiver of any breach of any of the provisions of this Agreement by either party shall not constitute a continuing waiver of any subsequent breach of said party of either the same or any other provision of this Agreement.

 

B-18.            Entire Agreement . This Agreement represents the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and neither the Lessee nor the Lessor have relied on any other fact or representation not expressly set forth herein,

 

B-19.            Paragraphs Interrelated . Each paragraph of this Agreement is interrelated to the other paragraphs and is not severable except by mutual consent of the parties.

 

B-20.            Modifications . This Agreement may be modified, amended, or changed in whole or in part only by an agreement in writing, duly authorized and executed by both the Lessee and Lessor with the same formality as this Agreement.

 

B-21.            Binding on Successors . The terms and conditions of this Agreement will be binding and obligatory upon the heirs, successors and assigns of either party. Upon assignment to a qualified assignee the assignor will be released from any further obligations under this Agreement.

 

B-22.            Recordation . Following the execution of this Agreement, the Lessee may cause it, or a memorandum thereof, to be recorded in the Gilpin County Clerk and Recorder’s Office in Central City, Colorado.

 

B-23.            Governing Law . This Agreement and its application shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado.

 

B-24.            Headings for Convenience Only . Paragraph headings and titles contained herein are intended for convenience and reference only and are not intended to define, limit, or describe the scope or intent of any provision of this Agreement.

 

12



 

B-25.            Arbitration . The parties agree to resolve any disputes arising out of this Agreement through binding arbitration.

 

B-26.            Attorneys’ Fees . In the event of any arbitration or litigation arising out of this Agreement, the party prevailing shall be entitled, in addition to other damages or costs, to receive attorneys’ fees from the other party.

 

B-27.            Sublease . The Lessee may sublease The Property for any purposes with the permission of the Lessor, which permission shall not be unreasonably withheld, especially if the proposed sublease is for parking lot purposes or for continuation of the purposes associated with any structure constructed or maintained upon The Property.

 

B-28.            Agreement Not to Compete . For the term of this Agreement and any renewal thereof, the Lessor, and its members individually, except for Dennis L. Blewitt, agree they will not in any way operate or participate to a significant degree in the management of any competing gaming casino which casino is located within the City of Black Hawk, Colorado.

 

B-29.            Lessee’s Financial Statement . Lessee agrees it will provide, upon Lessor’s request, but no more frequently than annually, a copy of its financial statement and any 8-K, 10-K or 10-Q reports.

 

13



 

LESSEE

 

LESSOR

 

 

 

 

 

 

ANCHOR COIN, INC., D/B/A
COLORADO CENTRAL STATION
CASINO, INC.

 

ANDRIANAKOS LIMITED LIABILITY
COMPANY

 

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ Ioannis Andrianakos

By:

 /s/ Stanley E. Fulton

 

 

Ioannis Andrianakos, Managing Member

 

Stanley E. Fulton, Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

14


Exhibit 10.46

 

ADDENDUM
TO
LEASE AND AGREEMENT-SPRING 1995
(LOWER LOTS)

 

 

This Addendum to Lease Agreement-Spring 1995 Lower Lots hereinafter (“Addendum”) is made this 4 th  day of April, 1996

between the Andrianakos Limited Liability Company, a Colorado limited liability company, the Lessor, and Anchor Coin, Inc., d/b/a Colorado Central Station Casino, Inc., the Lessee.

 

 

 

WHEREAS, the parties hereto are also parties to that certain Lease and Agreement-Spring 1995 (Lower Lots) dated

August 15, 1995, recorded at Book 590, Page 086, Gilpin County Clerk and Recorder’s office hereinafter (“Lease”); and,

 

 

 

WHEREAS, the parties wish to modify certain terms of the Lease concerning specific portions of the property hereinafter

described and the parties further wish to add additional property to the leasehold of the Lessee as more thoroughly described hereinafter.

 

 

NOW THEREFORE, be it agreed as follows:

 

 

1.

Property Identification .

 

 

 

The following described properties are the subject of this Addendum.

 

 

 

1.1.

 

Balance Lot 1. Block 50 . The Lease included the Easterly 20 feet of Lot 1, Block 50, City of Black Hawk. The remaining portion of Lot 1, Block 50 was not part of the Lease because of a competing claim of ownership made by other parties at the time of the execution . of the Lease. Lessor has now resolved those completing claims. Lessor owns and has marketable title to all of Lot 1, Block 50. Accordingly, the balance of Lot 1, Block 50 not leased to Lessee under the Lease (hereinafter “Balance Lot 1, Block 50”) which is more thoroughly described in Exhibit A attached hereto, is the subject of this Addendum.

 

 

 

 

 

1.2.

 

Gabriel Spalti Portion . Lessee pursuant to certain leases executed in 1993 and 1994 purported to lease to Lessor a portion of the Gabriel Spalti Tract Mining Claim, (hereinafter “Gabriel Spalti Portion”) which the property is more thorough described in Exhibit A attached hereto. Additionally, Subparagraph B-5. 7) of the Lease referenced that the Gabriel Spalti Portion might be a part of the property addressed in the Lease. Nevertheless, it was later determined the Lessor did not have title to the Gabriel Spalti Portion. Lessor did make a payment of $50,000.00 to the then owner of the Gabriel Spalti Portion. Subsequently, Lessee recently obtained title to the Gabriel Spalti Portion and such property is addressed in this Addendum.

 



 

 

1.3.

 

Lot 15, Block 49 . Lessor may have recently acquired Lot 15, Block 49, City of Black Hawk hereinafter (“Lot 15, Block 49”), which is more thoroughly described in Exhibit A attached hereto. To the extent that it exists Lot 15, Block 49 is West of and immediately adjacent to Balance Lot 1, Block 50. This property is also the subject of this Addendum.

 

 

 

 

2.

Disclaimer and Quit Claim

 

 

 

Lessor disclaims, in favor of Lessee any and all interest in the Gabriel Spalti Portion. Lessor has remised, released, sold, conveyed and Quit Claimed, and by these presents does remise, release, sell, convey and Quit Claim unto Lessee, it successors and assigns forever, all right, title, interest, claim and demand which the Lessor has in and to the Gabriel Spalti Portion, together with improvements, if any, situate, lying and being in the County of Gilpin, State of Colorado as described in Exhibit A. By its signature hereto Lessor acknowledges Lessee as owner to have and to hold the Gabriel Spalti Portion together with all and singular the appurtenances and privileges thereunto belonging, or in anywise thereunto appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest and claim whatsoever, of the Lessor, either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the Lessee, its successors and assigns forever.

 

 

3.

Lease of Balance Lot 1, Block 50 .

 

 

 

The Lease at paragraph B-5 gave the Lessee the option to add the Balance Lot 1, Block 50 to its leasehold provided the Lessor obtained marketable title thereto within one year of the date of the execution of the Lease. The Lessor has obtained such marketable title. Accordingly, the parties agree to add Balance of Lot 1, Block 50 to the leasehold estate conveyed to the Lessee under the Lease. The parties further agree Balance Lot 1, Block 50 contains approximately 2,765 square feet and that per the Lease the base rent to be paid, exclusive of any rental rate indexing, will increase to $104,500.00 per month.

 

 

4.

Addition of Lot 15, Block 49 .

 

 

 

To the extent that it exists, and to the extent Lessor has title thereto, Lot 15, Block 49 is added to the leasehold estate conveyed to the Lessee under the Lease. The parties further agree there shall be no change in the rental rate to the Lease as a result of this addition.

 

 

5.

Adequate Consideration .

 

 

 

The parties hereto each agree and acknowledge their mutual promises and covenants as herein set forth are adequate and sufficient consideration for the execution of this Addendum.

 

 

6.

Lease Provisions Remain .

 

 

 

Except as specifically modified in this Addendum, all other terms, conditions covenants and promises of the Lease remain in full force and effect, and will further control the operation and interpretation of both the Lease and this Addendum.

 

2



 

7.

Term, Renewal and Cancellations .

 

 

 

The term, renewal and cancellation provisions of the Lease apply to the property added by this Addendum to the leasehold estate conveyed to the Lessee under this Lease.

 

 

8.

Warranty and Title .

 

 

 

8.1

 

Marketable Title .      Lessor warrants and represents that it has unencumbered marketable title to Balance Lot 1, Block 50 which property is added to the leasehold estate of the Lessee except the following: A) the encumbrances listed in subparagraph B-5. 1) of the Lease relating to Lessor’s loan from the Bank of Cherry Creek; and, B) Deed of Trust recorded in Gilpin County, Book 586, Page 168 (“Deed of Trust”) in favor of Thomas W. Woodall and Sandra R. Woodall (“Woodalls”); however, as set forth in that certain Settlement Agreement dated August 18, 1995 between Lessor and Woodalls which Settlement Agreement is attached to and made part of that certain Stipulated Motion to Dismiss in District Court, Gilpin County, Case No. 94-CV-86, and in the Deed of Trust itself, Lessor further warrants the Woodalls’ Deed of Trust is subordinate to the Lease and this Addendum. Lessor acknowledges its agreements in the Lease not to request or obtain any further advances from the Bank of Cherry Creek secured by the property which is the subject of the Lease and not to use the property which is the subject of the Lease for any collateral or security purposes if said use would interfere, encumber or purport to be superior to Lessee’s use and enjoyment of the leasehold also applies to all of the property which is the subject of this Addendum. Lessor further acknowledges Lessee’s option right to cure any default of Lessor concerning the aforementioned obligations, and right to set off the costs of any such cure, also apply fully to the property which is the subject of this Addendum.

 

 

 

 

 

8.2

 

Title Insurance Policies .      Lessor agrees that it will provide to Lessee, at Lessor’s sole cost, within 30 days of the execution of this Addendum a title insurance policy evincing said marketable title to the Balance Lot 1, Block 50.

 

3



 

LESSEE

 

LESSOR

 

 

 

ANCHOR COIN, INC., D/B/A
COLORADO CENTRAL STATION
CASINO, INC.

 

ANDRIANAKOS LIMITED LIABILITY
COMPANY

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ Stanley E. Fulton

 

By:

/s/ Ioannis Andrianakos

Stanley E. Fulton,

 

Ioannis Andrianakos,

Chief Executive Officer

 

Managing Member

 

 

 

STATE OF COLORADO

)

 

 

 

 

) ss.

 

 

 

COUNTY OF

Denver

 

)

 

 

 

 

The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 3 rd day of April, 1996, by Ioannis Andrianakos, Managing Member on behalf of the Andrianakos Limited Liability Company, Lessor.

 

Witness my hand and official seal.

 

 

/s/ [ILLEGIBLE]

 

Notary Public

 

My commission expires:

September 7, 1999

 

 

(SEAL)

 

 

 

STATE OF NEVADA

)

 

 

 

 

) ss.

 

 

 

COUNTY OF CLARK

)

 

 

 

 

The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 4 th  day of April 1996, by Stanley E. Fulton, Chief Executive Officer, on behalf of Anchor Coin, Inc., d/b/a Colorado Central Station Casino, Inc., Lessee.

 

Witness my hand and official seal.

 

 

/s/ SUSAN A. DELZER

 

Notary Public

 

My commission expires:

January 17, 1997

 

SUSAN A. DELZER

 

 

Notary Public - State of Nevada

 

 

Appointment Recorded In Clark County

 

 

My Appointment Expires [ILLEGIBLE]

(SEAL)

 

4


Exhibit 10.47

 

SECOND ADDENDUM TO LEASE AND AGREEMENT - SPRING 1995
(LOWER LOTS)

 

This Second Addendum to Lease and Agreement – Spring 1995 (Lower Lots) (hereinafter referred to as Second Addendum ”) is made effective the 21 st day of March, 2003 between Andrianakos Limited Liability Company, a Colorado limited liability company, the “Lessor”, and CCSC/Blackhawk, Inc. d/b/a Colorado Central Station Casino, the “Lessee”.

 

RECITALS :

 

WHEREAS, Andrianakos Limited Liability Company and Anchor Coin d/b/a Colorado Central Station Casino entered into that certain Lease and Agreement Spring – 1995 (Lower Lots) dated August 15, 1995, as amended by Addendum to Lease and Agreement – Spring 1995 (Lower Lots) dated April 4, 1996 (hereinafter collectively referred to as the Lease ”);

 

WHEREAS, Anchor Coin d/b/a Colorado Central Station Casino assigned the Lease to CCSC/Blackhawk, Inc. effective January 1, 2002.

 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section A-6 of the Lease, Lessor provided notice of the purchase of land suitable for parking lot or building purposes consisting of all of Lot 14 except the Westerly 14 feet of said Lot, Block 49, City of Black Hawk, Colorado (hereinafter referred to as the Black Hawk Real Property ”);

 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section A-6 of the Lease, Lessee exercised its option to lease the Black Hawk Real Property;

 

NOW THEREFORE, be it agreed as follows:

 

1.        The Black Hawk Real Property is hereby added to the Property subject to the Lease.

 

2.        The parties agree that this Addendum shall be supplemented with the new legal description for the Black Hawk Real Property subsequent to the re-plat.

 

3.        Lessee shall pay additional rent in the amount of $6,954.84 per month for the addition of the Black Hawk Real Property commencing April 1, 2003. Lessee shall pay additional rent in the amount of $4,573.05 representing the prorated additional rent for the month of March 2003.

 

4.        This Addendum may be executed in counterparts. Except as modified herein, all other terms and conditions of the Lease shall remain in full force and effect.

 

[ILLEGIBLE]

 

[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]

 



 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Addendum to be executed by its duly authorized officers as of the date on page one.

 

LESSEE

LESSOR

 

 

CCSC/Blackhawk, Inc.

Andrianakos Limited Liability Company

d/b/a Colorado Central Station Casino

 

 

 

By:

/s/ Joseph Murphy

 

By:

/s/ Ioannis Andrianakos

 

Joseph Murphy, Treasurer/Secretary

 

 

Ioannis Andrianakos, Managing Member

 


Exhibit 10.48

 

THIRD ADDENDUM TO LEASE AND AGREEMENT - SPRING 1995
(LOWER LOTS)

 

This Third Addendum to Lease and Agreement – Spring 1995 (Lower Lots) (hereinafter referred to as this “ Third Addendum ”) is made effective the 22 nd day of April, 2003, between Andrianakos Limited Liability Company, a Colorado limited liability company, the “ Lessor ,” and Isle of Capri Black Hawk, L.L.C., a Colorado limited liability company, the “ Lessee .”

 

RECITALS :

 

WHEREAS, Andrianakos Limited Liability Company and Anchor Coin d/b/a Colorado Central Station Casino entered into that certain Lease and Agreement – Spring 1995 (Lower Lots) dated August 15, 1995, as amended by Addendum to Lease and Agreement – Spring 1995 (Lower Lots) dated April 4, 1996, and by Second Addendum to Lease and Agreement – Spring 1995 (Lower Lots) effective as of March 21, 2003 (hereinafter collectively referred to as the Lower Lot Lease ”);

 

WHEREAS, Andrianakos Limited Liability Company and Anchor Coin d/b/a Colorado Central Station Casino entered into that certain Spring 1995 – Amended and Restated Vacant Ground Lease For Parking Lot Purposes and Agreement (Upper Lot) dated August 15, 1995 and Lease Addendum dated May 1, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the “ Upper Lot Lease ”);

 

WHEREAS, Anchor Coin d/b/a Colorado Central Station Casino assigned the Upper Lot Lease to CCSC/Blackhawk, Inc. effective January 1, 2002 and CCSC/Blackhawk, Inc. d/b/a Colorado Central Station Casino and Andrianakos Limited Liability Company further amended the Upper Lot Lease by a Second Addendum to Spring 1995 – Amended and Restated Vacant Ground Lease for Parking Lot Purposes and Agreement (Upper Lot) dated effective April 22, 2003;

 

WHEREAS, Anchor Coin d/b/a Colorado Central Station Casino assigned the Lease to CCSC/Blackhawk, Inc. effective January 1, 2002;

 

WHEREAS, CCSC/Blackhawk, lnc., assigned the Lower Lot Lease and the Upper Lot Lease and conveyed the real property described on Schedule 1 (the “ Isle Real Property ”) to Isle of Capri Black Hawk, L.L.C. immediately prior to the effectiveness of this Third Addendum;

 

WHEREAS, the parties desire to add additional real property, including but not limited to, the Isle Real Property to the Property, as such term is defined in the Lower Lot Lease (hereinafter referred to as the “Lower Lot Property”), and to clarify the exact legal description of the property leased under the Lower Lot Lease; and

 

WHEREAS, the parties desire to otherwise amend and supplement the Lower Lot Lease as set forth herein.

 

1



 

NOW THEREFORE, be it agreed as follows:

 

AGREEMENT :

 

1.                                        Contemporaneous with the effective date of this Third Addendum, the Lessee shall execute a Special Warranty Deed conveying the Isle Real Property to Lessor free and clear of any liens or encumbrances except for easements, restrictions and covenants of record and shall deliver such deed to Lessor.

 

2.                                        Notwithstanding any contrary provision of the Lower Lot Lease or any amendments thereto, the parties agree that the Lower Lot Property, as the term “Property” is defined in the Lower Lot Lease (and which shall mean and refer to the property demised under . the Lower Lot Lease as the “Lower Lot Property”), shall be the real property described on the attached Exhibit A , which is incorporated herein by this reference. All previous definitions of the Property, as used in the Lower Lot Lease, are hereby deleted.

 

3.                                        The parties acknowledge that the total monthly rent under the Lower Lot Lease from and after April 1, 2003 (after adjustment in accordance with this paragraph) is equal to $135,351.84, subject to future adjustment pursuant to Paragraph A-5 of the Lower Lot Lease.

 

4.                                        Lessor acknowledges that persons who lease property to entities involved in gambling, such as Lessee, are subject to the Colorado Limited Gaming Act, C.R.S. §§ 12-47.1-101 et seq., as amended from time to time, and the regulations promulgated thereunder (collectively, the “ Gaming Laws ”), by the Colorado Limited Gaming Control Commission (the “ Gaming Commission ”) and the Colorado Division of Gaming (the “ Division ”) (the Gaming Commission and Division hereinafter collectively are referred to as the “ Gaming Authorities ”). Lessor acknowledges that Lessor and persons associated with Lessor may be required by the Gaming Authorities to submit financial, personal or other information to the Gaming Authorities and/or file application(s) for a determination of suitability, and if so required, Lessor agrees to submit, or cause to be submitted, such information and/or application(s), undergo such investigation(s), and pay the cost of any such investigation(s). Lessor agrees to use reasonable efforts comply with the applicable provisions of the Gaming Laws and any applicable orders of the Gaming Authorities.

 

5.                                        If at any time Lessee is required by the Director of the Division by final non-appealable order (provided that an appeal need not be prosecuted beyond the Gaming Commission in order to be considered final non-appealable), or by the Gaming Commission, to terminate the Lower Lot Lease or to terminate the use of any of the Real Property, as hereafter defined, because of Lessor or any person associated with Lessor (a “ Licensing Problem ”), then, in addition to any other rights set forth in this Lease, Lessee shall have the right to purchase the Lower Lot Property and the Upper Lot Property as is defined in the Upper Lot Lease (the “ Upper Lot Property ”) (the “Lower Lot Property” and the “Upper Lot Property” collectively referred to as the “ Real Property ”) from Lessor for a price equal to the Stream of Revenue Value, as defined in Paragraph 6 below. The closing of the purchase of the Real Property (the “ Closing ”) shall occur on the date designated by Lessee, but no sooner than fifteen (15) days and no later than

 

2



 

one hundred and twenty (120) after Lessee gives written notice of its election to purchase the Real Property as a result of a Licensing Problem. Pending the Closing, Lessee shall continue to make all rental and other payments required by the Leases in a timely manner, unless prohibited from doing so by the Gaming Commission or the Director as a result of the Licensing Problem. At the Closing Lessor shall deliver a special warranty deed for the Property, subject only to (a) those items affecting the Real Property as of the date hereof, (b) real estate taxes and assessments, and (c) such other items as may be hereafter consented to by Lessee. In no event shall the Real Property be transferred subject to any monetary liens imposed on the Real Property by Lessor. At the Closing Lessee shall pay the purchase price to Lessor in cash or certified funds. If requested by Lessor, Lessee shall cooperate with Lessor (at no cost or liability to Lessee) in a 1031 exchange of real property utilizing the Real Property, but in no event shall Lessee be obligated to delay the purchase of the Real Property. The provisions of this paragraph and Paragraph 4 may be enforced by an action for specific performance, or any other remedies available at law or in equity. It is hereby agreed and acknowledged that the Lower Lot Property may not be purchased by Lessee without Lessee also purchasing the Upper Lot Property

 

6.                                        The “ Stream of Revenue Value ” of the Real Property is defined as the previous twelve (12) months aggregate of gross rental income from the date Lessee gives written notice of its election to purchase the Real Property payable to Lessor under the Lower Lot Lease and the Upper Lot Lease divided by a number equal to the prime interest rate published by the Wall Street Journal on the date of the election to purchase the Real Property by Lessee, plus 2 points, but in no event less than 7% or more than 9%. For illustration purposes only, if the aggregate gross rental for the previous 12 months equals $2,000,000 and the prime rate equals 6%, the Stream of Revenue Value would equal $2,000,000 divided by 8% (prime rate plus 2) for a total of $25,000,000.

 

7.                                        Lessor hereby consents to the assignment of the Lease to Lessee (without acknowledging that such consent is required), it being understood that such assignment will not relieve CCSC/Blackhawk, Inc. of any obligations under the Lease.

 

8.                                        As modified herein, all other terms and conditions of the Lease shall remain in full force and effect, and the Lease is hereby ratified and confirmed. This Addendum may be executed in counterparts.

 

[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]

 

3



 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Addendum to be executed by its duly authorized officers as of the date on page one.

 

LESSEE

 

LESSOR

 

 

 

Isle of Capri Black Hawk, LLC

 

Andrianakos Limited Liability Company

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ Allan B. Soloman

 

By:

/s/ Ioannis Andrianakos

 

Title:

Allan B. Soloman

 

 

Ioannis Andrianakos, Manager

 

 

Executive Vice President

 

 

 

 

4


Exhibit 12.1

 

Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges

(dollars in millions)

 

 

 

April 27,

 

April 29,

 

April 30,

 

April 24,

 

April 25,

 

 

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operatons before income taxes and minority interest

 

$

(156.8

)

$

(15.9

)

$

20.7

 

$

34.3

 

$

49.8

 

Fixed charges

 

125.2

 

112.4

 

92.9

 

80.7

 

83.6

 

Less capitalized interest

 

(3.3

)

(9.5

)

(4.6

)

(3.2

)

(1.5

)

Earnings (loss)

 

$

(34.9

)

$

87.0

 

$

109.0

 

$

111.8

 

$

131.9

 

Interest expense

 

$

109.3

 

$

89.2

 

$

76.3

 

$

65.0

 

$

69.8

 

Capitalized interest

 

3.3

 

9.5

 

4.6

 

3.2

 

1.5

 

Interest portion of rental expense

 

12.6

 

13.7

 

12.0

 

12.5

 

12.3

 

Total fixed charges

 

$

125.2

 

$

112.4

 

$

92.9

 

$

80.7

 

$

83.6

 

Ration of earnings to fixed charges

 

N/M

 

1.3

x

0.9

x

0.7

x

0.6

x

 


Exhibit 21.1

 

SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES OF ISLE OF CAPRI CASINOS, INC.

 

 

 

STATE OF INCORPORATION

 

WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Black Hawk Holdings, L.L.C.

 

Colorado

 

Capri Air, Inc.

 

Mississippi

 

Capri Insurance Corporation

 

Hawaii

 

Casino America of Colorado, Inc.

 

Colorado

 

CCSC Blackhawk, Inc.

 

Colorado

 

Grand Palais Riverboat, Inc.

 

Louisiana

 

IC Holdings Colorado, Inc.

 

Colorado

 

IOC-Boonville, Inc.

 

Nevada

 

IOC-Davenport, Inc.

 

Iowa

 

IOC-Kansas City, Inc.

 

Missouri

 

IOC-Lula, Inc.

 

Mississippi

 

IOC-Natchez

 

Mississippi

 

IOC Black Hawk County, Inc.

 

Iowa

 

IOC Holdings, L.L.C.

 

Louisiana

 

IOC Pittsburgh, Inc.

 

Pennsylvania

 

IOC Services, L.L.C.

 

Delaware

 

Isle of Capri Bettendorf, L.C.

 

Iowa

 

Isle of Capri Black Hawk, L.L.C.

 

Colorado

 

Isle of Capri Marquette, Inc.

 

Iowa

 

PPI. Inc

 

Florida

 

Riverboat Corporation of Mississippi

 

Mississippi

 

St. Charles Gaming Company, Inc.

 

Louisiana

 

The Isle Casinos Limited

 

United Kingdom

 

 

 

 

 

PARTIALLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Blue Chip Casinos, Ltd.

 

United Kingdom

 

 


Exhibit 23.1

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-61752, 33-80918, 33-86940, 33-93088, 333-50774, 333-50776, 333-77233, 333-111498, 333-123233, and 333-123234), on Form S-4 (File No. 333-115419), and on Form S-3 (File No. 333-115810) of Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. of our reports dated July 10, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the fiscal year ended April 27, 2008.

 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

 

 

St. Louis, Missouri

July 10, 2008

 


Exhibit 24.1

 

POWER OF ATTORNEY

 

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT, that the undersigned Directors of Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. , a Delaware corporation, which is about to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 its Annual Report Form 10K for its fiscal year ended April 27, 2008, hereby constitutes and James B. Perry and Dale R. Black, and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power to act without the other, to sign such Annual Report and to file such Annual Report and the exhibits thereto and any and all other documents and amendments in connection therewith with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any national exchange or self regulatory agency and to do and perform any and all acts and things requisite and necessary to be done in connection with the foregoing as fully as he might or could do in person hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or either of them, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

 

Dated:  July 7, 2008

 

 

/s/ W. Randolph Baker

 

W. Randolph Baker, Director

 

 

 

/s/ John Brackenbury

 

John Brackenbury, Director

 

 

 

/s/ Alan Glazer

 

Alan Glazer, Director

 

 

 

/s/ Bernard Goldstein

 

Bernard Goldstein, Director

 

 

 

/s/ Jeffrey D. Goldstein

 

Jeffrey D. Goldstein, Director

 

 

 

/s/ Robert S. Goldstein

 

Robert S. Goldstein, Director

 

 

 

/s/ Shaun R. Hayes

 

Shaun R. Hayes, Director

 

 

 

/s/ Lee Wielansky

 

Lee Wielansky, Director

 


Exhibit 31.1

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

I, James B. Perry, Chief Executive Officer of Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc., certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date:    July 11, 2008

 

/s/  James B. Perry

 

 

James B. Perry

 

 

Chief Executive Officer

 


Exhibit 31.2

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

I, Dale R. Black, Chief Financial Officer of Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc., certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date:    July 11, 2008

/s/  Dale R. Black

 

Dale R. Black

 

Chief Financial Officer

 


Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended April 29, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, James B. Perry, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

 

Date: July 11, 2008

/s/  James B. Perry

 

James B. Perry

 

Chief Executive Officer

 


Exhibit 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended April 29, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, Dale R. Black, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

 

Date: July 11, 2008

/s/  Dale R. Black

 

Dale R. Black

 

Chief Financial Officer

 


Exhibit 99.1

 

DESCRIPTION OF GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS

 

The ownership and operation of casino gaming facilities are subject to extensive state and local regulations. We are required to obtain and maintain gaming licenses in each of the jurisdictions in which we conduct gaming. The limitation, conditioning or suspension of gaming licenses could (and the revocation or non-renewal of gaming licenses, or the failure to reauthorize gaming in certain jurisdictions, would) materially adversely affect our operation in that jurisdiction. In addition, changes in law that restrict or prohibit our gaming operations in any jurisdiction could have a material adverse effect on us.

 

Louisiana

 

In July 1991, Louisiana enacted legislation permitting certain types of gaming activity on certain rivers and waterways in Louisiana. The legislation granted authority to supervise riverboat gaming activities to the Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Commission and the Riverboat Gaming Enforcement Division of the Louisiana State Police. The Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Commission was authorized to hear and determine all appeals relative to the granting, suspension, revocation, condition or renewal of all licenses, permits and applications. In addition, the Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Commission established regulations concerning authorized routes, duration of excursions, minimum levels of insurance, construction of riverboats and periodic inspections. The Riverboat Gaming Enforcement Division of the Louisiana State Police was authorized to investigate applicants and issue licenses, investigate violations of the statute and conduct continuing reviews of gaming activities.

 

In May 1996, regulatory oversight of riverboat gaming was transferred to the Louisiana Gaming Control Board, which is comprised of nine voting members appointed by the governor. The Louisiana Gaming Control Board now oversees all licensing matters for riverboat casinos, land-based casinos, racinos, video poker and certain aspects of Native American gaming other than those responsibilities reserved to the Louisiana State Police.

 

The Louisiana Gaming Control Board is empowered to issue up to 15 licenses to conduct gaming activities on a riverboat in accordance with applicable law. However, no more than six licenses may be granted to riverboats operating from any one designated waterway.

 

The Louisiana State Police continues to be involved broadly in gaming enforcement and reports to the Louisiana Gaming Control Board. Louisiana law permits the Louisiana State Police, among other things, to continue to (1) conduct suitability investigations, (2) audit, investigate and enforce compliance with standing regulations, (3) initiate enforcement and administrative actions and (4) perform “all other duties and functions necessary for the efficient, efficacious, and thorough regulation and control of gaming activities and operations” under the Louisiana Gaming Control Board’s jurisdiction.

 

Louisiana gaming law specifies certain restrictions relating to the operation of riverboat gaming, including the following:

 

·

 

agents of the Louisiana State Police are permitted on board at any time during gaming operations;

 

 

 

·

 

gaming devices, equipment and supplies may only be purchased or leased from permitted suppliers and, with respect to gaming equipment, from permitted manufacturers;

 

 

 

·

 

gaming may only take place in the designated gaming area while the riverboat is docked on a designated river or waterway;

 

 

 

·

 

gaming equipment may not be possessed, maintained or exhibited by any person on a riverboat except in the specifically designated gaming area or in a secure area used for inspection, repair or storage of such equipment;

 

 

 

·

 

wagers may be received only from a person present on a licensed riverboat;

 

 

 

·

 

persons under 21 are not permitted in designated gaming areas;

 

 

 

·

 

except for slot machine play, wagers may be made only with tokens, chips or electronic cards purchased from the licensee aboard a riverboat;

 

 

 

·

 

licensees may only use docking facilities and routes for which they are licensed and may only board and discharge passengers at the riverboat’s licensed berth;

 

1



 

·

 

licensees must have adequate protection and indemnity insurance;

 

 

 

·

 

licensees must have all necessary federal and state licenses, certificates and other regulatory approvals prior to operating a riverboat; and

 

 

 

·

 

gaming may only be conducted in accordance with the terms of the license and Louisiana law.

 

To receive a gaming license in Louisiana, an applicant must be found to be a person of good character, honesty and integrity and a person whose prior activities, criminal record, if any, reputation, habits and associations do not (1) pose a threat to the public interest of the State of Louisiana or to the effective regulation and control of gaming or (2) create or enhance the dangers of unsuitable, unfair or illegal practices, methods and activities in the conduct of gaming or the carrying on of business and financial arrangements of gaming activities. In addition, the Louisiana Gaming Control Board will not grant a license unless it finds that, among other things:

 

·

 

the applicant can demonstrate the capability, either through training, education, business experience or a combination of the preceding, to operate a gaming operation;

 

 

 

·

 

the proposed financing of the riverboat and the gaming operations is adequate for the nature of the proposed operation and is from a suitable and acceptable source;

 

 

 

·

 

the applicant demonstrates a proven ability to operate a vessel of comparable size, capacity and complexity to a riverboat so as to ensure the safety of its passengers;

 

 

 

·

 

the applicant submits with its application for a license a detailed plan of design of the riverboat;

 

 

 

·

 

the applicant designates the docking facilities to be used by the riverboat;

 

 

 

·

 

the applicant shows adequate financial ability to construct and maintain a riverboat; and

 

 

 

·

 

the applicant has a good faith plan to recruit, train and upgrade minorities in all employment classifications.

 

An initial license to conduct riverboat gaming operations is valid for a term of five years and legislation passed in the 1999 legislative session provides for renewals every five years thereafter. Louisiana gaming law provides that a renewal application for the period succeeding the initial five-year term of an operator’s license must be made to the Louisiana Gaming Control Board and must include a statement under oath of any and all changes in information, including financial information, provided in the previous application. The transfer of a license or an interest in a license is prohibited. A gaming license is deemed to be a privilege under Louisiana law and, as such, may be denied, revoked, suspended, conditioned or limited at any time by the Louisiana Gaming Control Board. The Isle-Lake Charles received a five-year renewal of its license on July 20, 1999.

 

On April 9, 2004, the Isle-Lake Charles filed applications for a second five-year renewal of its two licenses. These five-year renewal applications were approved for Grand Palais Riverboat, Inc. on August 17, 2004 and St. Charles Gaming Company, Inc. was approved on March 29, 2005.

 

Certain persons affiliated with a riverboat gaming licensee, including directors and officers of the licensee, directors and officers of any holding company of the licensee involved in gaming operations, persons holding 5% or greater interests in the licensee and persons exercising influence over a licensee, are subject to the application and suitability requirements of Louisiana gaming law.

 

The sale, purchase, assignment, transfer, pledge or other hypothecation, lease, disposition or acquisition by any person of securities that represent 5% or more of the total outstanding shares issued by a licensee is subject to the approval of the Louisiana Gaming Control Board. A security issued by a licensee must generally disclose these restrictions. Prior approval from the Louisiana Gaming Control Board is required for the sale, purchase, assignment, transfer, pledge or other hypothecation, lease, disposition or acquisition of any ownership interest of 5% or more of any non-corporate licensee or for the transfer of any “economic

 

2



 

interest” of 5% or more of any licensee or affiliated gaming person. An “economic interest” is defined as any interest whereby a person receives or is entitled to receive, by agreement or otherwise, a profit, gain, thing of value, loan, credit, security interest, ownership interest or other benefit.

 

Fees payable to the state for conducting gaming activities on a riverboat include (1) $50,000 per riverboat for the first year of operation and $100,000 per year per riverboat thereafter, plus (2) 18.5% of net gaming proceeds. Legislation was passed during the 2001 legislative session that allowed those riverboats that had been required to conduct cruises, including the riverboats at the Isle-Lake Charles, to remain permanently dockside beginning April 1, 2001. The legislation also increased the gaming tax for operators from 18.5% to 21.5%. A statute also authorizes local governing authorities to levy boarding fees. We currently have development agreements in Lake Charles with certain local governing authorities in the jurisdictions in which we operate pursuant to which we make payments in lieu of boarding fees.

 

A licensee must notify and/or seek approval from the Louisiana Gaming Control Board in connection with any withdrawals of capital, loans, advances or distributions in excess of 5% of retained earnings for a corporate licensee, or of capital accounts for a partnership or limited liability company licensee, upon completion of any such transaction. The Louisiana Gaming Control Board may issue an emergency order for not more than ten days prohibiting payment of profits, income or accruals by, or investments in, a licensee. Unless excepted or waived by the Louisiana Gaming Control Board, riverboat gaming licensees and their affiliated gaming persons must notify the Louisiana Gaming Control Board 60 days prior to the receipt by any such persons of any loans or extensions of credit or modifications thereof. The Louisiana Gaming Control Board is required to investigate the reported loan, extension of credit or modification thereof and to determine whether an exemption exists on the requirement of prior written approval and, if such exemption is not applicable, to either approve or disapprove the transaction. If the Louisiana Gaming Control Board disapproves of a transaction, the transaction cannot be entered into by the licensee or affiliated gaming person. We are an affiliated gaming person of our subsidiaries that hold the licenses to conduct riverboat gaming at the Isle-Lake Charles.

 

The failure of a licensee to comply with the requirements set forth above may result in the suspension or revocation of that licensee’s gaming license. Additionally, if the Louisiana Gaming Control Board finds that the individual owner or holder of a security of a corporate license or intermediary company or any person with an economic interest in a licensee is not qualified under Louisiana law, the Louisiana Gaming Control Board may require, under penalty of suspension or revocation of the license, that the person not:

 

·

 

receive dividends or interest on securities of the corporation;

 

 

 

·

 

exercise directly or indirectly a right conferred by securities of the corporation;

 

 

 

·

 

receive remuneration or economic benefit from the licensee;

 

 

 

·

 

exercise significant influence over activities of the licensee; or

 

 

 

·

 

continue its ownership or economic interest in the licensee.

 

A licensee must periodically report the following information to the Louisiana Gaming Control Board, which is not confidential and is available for public inspection: (1) the licensee’s net gaming proceeds from all authorized games, (2) the amount of net gaming proceeds tax paid and (3) all quarterly and annual financial statements presenting historical data, including annual financial statements that have been audited by an independent certified public auditor.

 

During the 1996 special session of the Louisiana legislature, legislation was enacted placing on the ballot for a statewide election a constitutional amendment limiting the expansion of gaming, which was subsequently passed by the voters. As a result, local option elections are required before new or additional forms of gaming can be brought into a parish.

 

Proposals to amend or supplement Louisiana’s riverboat gaming statute are frequently introduced in the Louisiana State Legislature. There is no assurance that changes in Louisiana gaming law will not occur or that such changes will not have a material adverse effect on our business in Louisiana.

 

3



 

In July 2006, the subsidiary that held the Company’s license to operate a riverboat in Bossier City transferred its license to an unrelated third party.

 

Mississippi

 

In June 1990, Mississippi enacted legislation legalizing dockside casino gaming for counties along the Mississippi River, which is the western border for most of the state, and the Gulf Coast, which is the southern border for most of the state. The legislation gave each of those counties the opportunity to hold a referendum on whether to allow dockside casino gaming within its boundaries.

 

In its 2005 regular session, the legislature amended Mississippi law to allow gaming to be conducted on vessels or cruise vessels placed upon permanent structures located on, in or above the Mississippi River, on, in or above navigable waters in eligible counties along the Mississippi River or on, in or above the waters lying south of the counties along the Mississippi Gulf Coast. Later, after Hurricane Katrina, the Mississippi legislature again amended the law to allow land-based gaming along the Gulf Coast in very limited circumstances. Mississippi law permits unlimited stakes gaming, on a 24-hour basis and does not restrict the percentage of space that may be utilized for gaming. There are no limitations on the number of gaming licenses that may be issued in Mississippi.

 

The ownership and operation of gaming facilities in Mississippi are subject to extensive state and local regulation intended to:

 

·

 

prevent unsavory or unsuitable persons from having any direct or indirect involvement with gaming at any time or in any capacity;

 

 

 

·

 

establish and maintain responsible accounting practices and procedures for gaming operations;

 

 

 

·

 

maintain effective control over the financial practices of licensees, including establishing minimum procedures for internal fiscal affairs and safeguarding of assets and revenues, providing reliable record keeping and making periodic reports;

 

 

 

·

 

provide a source of state and local revenues through taxation and licensing fees;

 

 

 

·

 

prevent cheating and fraudulent practices; and

 

 

 

·

 

ensure that gaming licensees, to the extent practicable, employ Mississippi residents.

 

State gaming regulations are subject to amendment and interpretation by the Mississippi Gaming Commission. Changes in Mississippi laws or regulations may limit or otherwise materially affect the types of gaming that may be conducted in Mississippi and such changes, if enacted, could have an adverse effect on us and our Mississippi gaming operations.

 

We are registered as a publicly traded corporation under the Mississippi Gaming Control Act. Our gaming operations in Mississippi are subject to regulatory control by the Mississippi Gaming Commission, the State Tax Commission and various other local, city and county regulatory agencies (collectively referred to as the “Mississippi Gaming Authorities”). Our subsidiaries have obtained gaming licenses from the Mississippi Gaming Authorities. We must obtain a waiver from the Mississippi Gaming Commission before beginning certain proposed gaming operations outside of Mississippi, and we must notify the Mississippi Gaming Commission in writing within 30 days after commencing certain gaming operations outside the state.  The licenses held by our Mississippi gaming operations have terms of three years and are not transferable. The Isle-Biloxi, the Isle-Natchez and the Isle-Lula hold licenses effective from May 23, 2006, through May 22, 2009. In addition, our wholly-owned subsidiary, IOC Manufacturing, Inc. holds a manufacturer and distributor’s license, so that we may perform certain upgrades to our Mississippi player tracking system. This license has a term of three years, is effective from June 16, 2008 through June 15, 2011, and is not transferable. There is no assurance that new licenses can be obtained at the end of each

 

4



 

three-year period of a license. Moreover, the Mississippi Gaming Commission may, at any time, and for any cause it deems reasonable, revoke, suspend, condition, limit or restrict a license or approval to own shares of stock in our subsidiaries that operate in Mississippi.

 

Substantial fines for each violation of Mississippi’s gaming laws or regulations may be levied against us, our subsidiaries and the persons involved. Disciplinary action against us or one of our subsidiary gaming licensees in any jurisdiction may lead to disciplinary action against us or any of our subsidiary licensees in Mississippi, including, but not limited to, the revocation or suspension of any such subsidiary gaming license.

 

We, along with each of our Mississippi gaming subsidiaries, must periodically submit detailed financial, operating and other reports to the Mississippi Gaming Commission and/or the State Tax Commission. Numerous transactions, including but not limited to substantially all loans, leases, sales of securities and similar financing transactions entered into by any of our Mississippi gaming subsidiaries must be reported to or approved by the Mississippi Gaming Commission. In addition, the Mississippi Gaming Commission may, at its discretion, require additional information about our operations.

 

Certain of our officers and employees and the officers, directors and certain key employees of our Mississippi gaming subsidiaries must be found suitable or be licensed by the Mississippi Gaming Commission. We believe that all required findings of suitability and key employee licenses related to all of our Mississippi properties have been applied for or obtained, although the Mississippi Gaming Commission at its discretion may require additional persons to file applications for findings of suitability or key employee licenses. In addition, any person having a material relationship or involvement with us may be required to be found suitable or licensed, in which case those persons must pay the costs and fees associated with such investigation. The Mississippi Gaming Commission may deny an application for a finding of suitability for any cause that it deems reasonable. Changes in certain licensed positions must be reported to the Mississippi Gaming Commission. In addition to its authority to deny an application for a finding of suitability, the Mississippi Gaming Commission has jurisdiction to disapprove a change in a licensed position. The Mississippi Gaming Commission has the power to require us and any of our Mississippi gaming subsidiaries to suspend or dismiss officers, directors and other key employees or to sever relationships with other persons who refuse to file appropriate applications or who the authorities find unsuitable to act in such capacities.

 

Employees associated with gaming must obtain work permits that are subject to immediate suspension under certain circumstances. The Mississippi Gaming Commission will refuse to issue a work permit to a person who has been convicted of a felony, committed certain misdemeanors or knowingly violated the Mississippi Gaming Control Act, and it may refuse to issue a work permit to a gaming employee for any other reasonable cause.

 

At any time, the Mississippi Gaming Commission has the power to investigate and require the finding of suitability of any record or beneficial stockholder of ours. The Mississippi Gaming Control Act requires any person who individually or in association with others acquires, directly or indirectly, beneficial ownership of more than 5% of our common stock to report the acquisition to the Mississippi Gaming Commission, and such person may be required to be found suitable. In addition, the Mississippi Gaming Control Act requires any person who, individually or in association with others, becomes, directly or indirectly, a beneficial owner of more than 10% of our common stock, as reported to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, to apply for a finding of suitability by the Mississippi Gaming Commission and pay the costs and fees that the Mississippi Gaming Commission incurs in conducting the investigation.

 

The Mississippi Gaming Commission has generally exercised its discretion to require a finding of suitability of any beneficial owner of more than 5% of a registered publicly traded corporation’s stock. However, the Mississippi Gaming Commission has adopted a regulation that may permit certain “institutional” investors to obtain waivers that allow them to beneficially own, directly or indirectly, up to 15% (19% in certain specific instances) of the voting securities of a registered publicly traded corporation without a finding of suitability. If a stockholder who must be found suitable is a corporation, partnership or trust, it must submit detailed business and financial information, including a list of beneficial owners.

 

5



 

Any person who fails or refuses to apply for a finding of suitability or a license within 30 days after being ordered to do so by the Mississippi Gaming Commission may be found unsuitable. We believe that compliance by us with the licensing procedures and regulatory requirements of the Mississippi Gaming Commission will not affect the marketability of our securities. Any person found unsuitable who holds, directly or indirectly, any beneficial ownership of our securities beyond such time as the Mississippi Gaming Commission prescribes may be guilty of a misdemeanor. We are subject to disciplinary action if, after receiving notice that a person is unsuitable to be a stockholder or to have any other relationship with us or our subsidiaries operating casinos in Mississippi, we:

 

·

 

pay the unsuitable person any dividend or other distribution upon its voting securities;

 

 

 

·

 

recognize the exercise, directly or indirectly, of any voting rights conferred by its securities;

 

 

 

·

 

pay the unsuitable person any remuneration in any form for services rendered or otherwise, except in certain limited and specific circumstances; or

 

 

 

·

 

fail to pursue all lawful efforts to require the unsuitable person to divest itself of the securities, including, if necessary, our immediate purchase of the securities for cash at a fair market value.

 

We may be required to disclose to the Mississippi Gaming Commission upon request the identities of the holders of any of our debt securities. In addition, under the Mississippi Gaming Control Act, the Mississippi Gaming Commission may, in its discretion, (1) require holders of our securities, including our notes, to file applications, (2) investigate such holders and (3) require such holders to be found suitable to own such securities. Although the Mississippi Gaming Commission generally does not require the individual holders of obligations such as the notes to be investigated and found suitable, the Mississippi Gaming Commission retains the discretion to do so for any reason, including but not limited to a default, or where the holder of the debt instrument exercises a material influence over the gaming operations of the entity in question. Any holder of debt securities required to apply for a finding of suitability must pay all investigative fees and costs of the Mississippi Gaming Commission in connection with such an investigation.

 

The Mississippi regulations provide that a change in control of us may not occur without the prior approval of the Mississippi Gaming Commission. Mississippi law prohibits us from making a public offering of our securities without the approval of the Mississippi Gaming Commission if any part of the proceeds of the offering is to be used to finance the construction, acquisition or operation of gaming facilities in Mississippi, or to retire or extend obligations incurred for one or more such purposes. The Mississippi Gaming Commission has the authority to grant a continuous approval of securities offerings and has granted such approval to us, subject to renewal every three years.

 

Regulations of the Mississippi Gaming Commission prohibit certain repurchases of securities of publicly traded corporations registered with the Mississippi Gaming Commission, including holding companies such as ours, without prior approval of the Mississippi Gaming Commission. Transactions covered by these regulations are generally aimed at discouraging repurchases of securities at a premium over market price from certain holders of greater than 3% of the outstanding securities of the registered publicly traded corporation. The regulations of the Mississippi Gaming Commission also require prior approval for a “plan of recapitalization” as defined in such regulations.

 

We must maintain in the State of Mississippi current stock ledgers, which may be examined by the Mississippi Gaming Authorities at any time. If any securities are held in trust by an agent or by a nominee, the record holder may be required to disclose the identity of the beneficial owner to the Mississippi Gaming Authorities. A failure to make such disclosure may be grounds for finding the record holder unsuitable. We must render maximum assistance in determining the identity of the beneficial owner.

 

Mississippi law requires that certificates representing shares of our common stock bear a legend to the general effect that the securities are subject to the Mississippi Gaming Control Act and regulations of the Mississippi Gaming Commission. The Mississippi Gaming Commission has the authority to grant a waiver

 

6



 

from the legend requirement, which we have obtained. The Mississippi Gaming Commission, through the power to regulate licenses, has the power to impose additional restrictions on the holders of our securities at any time.

 

The Mississippi Gaming Commission enacted a regulation in 1994 requiring that, as a condition to licensure, an applicant must provide a plan to develop infrastructure facilities amounting to 25% of the cost of the casino and a parking facility capable of accommodating 500 cars. In 1999, the Mississippi Gaming Commission approved amendments to this regulation that increased the infrastructure development requirement from 25% to 100% for new casinos (or upon acquisition of a closed casino), but grandfathered existing licensees and development plans approved prior to the effective date of the new regulation. “Infrastructure facilities” include any of the following:

 

·

 

a 250-room or larger hotel of at least a two-star rating as defined by the current edition of the Mobil Travel Guide;

 

 

 

·

 

theme parks;

 

 

 

·

 

golf courses;

 

 

 

·

 

marinas;

 

 

 

·

 

entertainment facilities;

 

 

 

·

 

tennis complexes; or

 

 

 

·

 

any other facilities approved by the Mississippi Gaming Commission.

 

Parking facilities, roads, sewage and water systems or civic facilities are not considered “infrastructure facilities.” The Mississippi Gaming Commission may reduce the number of rooms required in a hotel if it is satisfied that sufficient rooms are available to accommodate the anticipated number of visitors. In 2003 and in 2006, the Mississippi Gaming Commission again amended its regulation regarding development plan approval but left the 100% infrastructure requirement intact. In 2007, the Mississippi Gaming Commission further amended this regulation. Among other things, the 2007 amendment retained the 100% infrastructure requirement and added a requirement that the qualified infrastructure be owned or leased by certain specified persons.

 

License fees and taxes are payable to the State of Mississippi and to the counties and cities in which a Mississippi gaming subsidiary’s respective operations will be conducted. The license fee payable to the state of Mississippi is based upon gross revenue of the licensee (generally defined as gaming receipts less payout to customers as winnings) and equals 4% of gross revenue of $50,000 or less per month, 6% of gross revenue in excess of $50,000 but less than $134,000 per calendar month, and 8% of gross revenue in excess of $134,000 per calendar month. The foregoing license fees are allowed as a credit against the licensee’s Mississippi income tax liability for the year paid. Additionally, a licensee must pay a $5,000 annual license fee and an annual fee based upon the number of games it operates. The gross revenue tax imposed by the Mississippi communities and counties in which our casino operations are located equals 0.4% of gross revenue of $50,000 or less per calendar month, 0.6% of gross revenue over $50,000 and less than $134,000 per calendar month and 0.8% of gross revenue greater than $134,000 per calendar month. These fees have been imposed in, among other cities and counties, Biloxi and Coahoma County. Certain local and private laws of the state of Mississippi may impose fees or taxes on the Mississippi gaming subsidiaries in addition to the fees described above.

 

The Mississippi Gaming Commission requires, as a condition of licensure or license renewal, that casino vessels on the Mississippi Gulf Coast that are not self-propelled must be moored to withstand a Category 4 hurricane with 155 mile-per-hour winds and 15-foot tidal surge. However, after Hurricane Katrina, Isle - Biloxi reopened its casino on shore rather than on a vessel. A 1996 Mississippi Gaming Commission regulation prescribes the hurricane emergency procedure to be used by the Mississippi Gulf Coast casinos.

 

7



 

The sale of food or alcoholic beverages at our Mississippi gaming locations is subject to licensing, control and regulation by the applicable state and local authorities. The agencies involved have full power to limit, condition, suspend or revoke any such license, and any such disciplinary action could (and revocation would) have a material adverse effect upon the operations of the affected casino or casinos. Certain of our officers and managers and our  Mississippi gaming subsidiaries must be investigated by the Alcoholic Beverage Control Division of the State Tax Commission in connection with liquor permits that have been issued. The Alcoholic Beverage Control Division of the State Tax Commission must approve all changes in licensed positions.

 

On three separate occasions since 1998, certain anti-gaming groups have proposed referenda that, if adopted, would have banned gaming in Mississippi and required that gaming entities cease operations within two years after the ban. All three referenda were declared invalid by Mississippi courts because each lacked a required government revenue impact statement.

 

Missouri

 

Conducting gambling activities and operating an excursion gambling boat in Missouri are subject to extensive regulation under Missouri’s Riverboat Gambling Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. The Missouri Gaming Commission was created by the Missouri Riverboat Gambling Act and is charged with regulatory authority over riverboat gaming operations in Missouri, including the issuance of riverboat gaming licenses to owners, operators, suppliers and certain affiliates of riverboat gaming facilities. In June 2000, IOC-Kansas City, Inc., a subsidiary of ours, was issued a riverboat gaming license in connection with our Kansas City operation. In December 2001, IOC-Boonville, Inc., a subsidiary of ours, was issued a riverboat gaming license for our Boonville operation. Additionally, in June of 2007, IOC-Caruthersville, LLC f/k/a Aztar Missouri Riverboat Gaming Company, LLC was acquired by us and operates as a subsidiary of ours under a Missouri riverboat gaming license.

 

In order to obtain a license to operate a riverboat gaming facility, the proposed operating business entity must complete a Riverboat Gaming Application Form requesting a Class B License.  In order to obtain a license to own and/or control a riverboat gaming facility as its ultimate holding company, the proposed parent company must complete a Riverboat Gaming Application Form requesting a Class A License.  The Riverboat Gaming Application Form is comprised of comprehensive application forms, including corroborating attachments.  Applicants who submit the Riverboat Gaming Application Form requesting either a Class A or Class B license undergo an extensive background investigation by the Missouri Gaming Commission. In addition, each key person associated with the applicant (including directors, officers, managers and owners of a significant direct or indirect interest in the Class A or Class B applicant) must complete a Key Person and Level I Application Form and undergo a substantial background investigation. Certain key business entities closely related to the applicant or “key person business entities” must undergo a similar application process and background check. An applicant for a Class A or Class B license will not receive a license if the applicant and its key persons, including key person business entities, have not established good repute and moral character and no licensee shall either employ or contract with any person who has pled guilty to, or been convicted of, a felony, to perform any duties directly connected with the licensee’s privileges under a license granted by the Missouri Gaming Commission.

 

Each Class B license granted entitles a licensee to conduct gambling activities on an excursion gambling boat or to operate an excursion gambling boat and the equipment thereon from a specific location. Each Class A license granted entitles the licensee to develop and operate a Class B licensee or, if authorized, multiple Class B licensees.  The duration of both the Class A and Class B license initially runs for two one-year terms; thereafter, two-year terms. In conjunction with the renewal of each license, the Missouri Gaming Commission requires an updated Riverboat Gaming Application Form and renewal fees.  In conjunction with each renewal, the Commission may conduct an additional investigation of the licensee with specific emphasis on new information provided in the updated Riverboat Gaming Application Form. Each sixth year from the date of the original license a comprehensive investigation for the period since the last comprehensive investigation is conducted on the Class A, Class B, supplier and key person licensees in

 

8



 

the same manner as the initial investigation. The Commission also licenses the serving of alcoholic beverages on riverboats and related facilities.

 

In determining whether to grant a license, the Commission considers the following factors, among others: (i) the integrity of the applicants; (ii) the types and variety of games the applicant may offer; (iii) the quality of the physical facility, together with improvements and equipment, and how soon the project will be completed; (iv) the financial ability of the applicant to develop and operate the facility successfully; (v) the status of governmental actions required by the facility; (vi) management ability of the applicant; (vii) compliance with applicable statutes, rules, charters and ordinances; (viii) the economic, ecological and social impact of the facility as well as the cost of public improvements; (ix) the extent of public support or opposition; (x) the plan adopted by the home dock city or county; and (xi) effects on competition.

 

A licensee is subject to the imposition of penalties, suspension or revocation of its license for any act that is injurious to the public health, safety, morals, good order, and general welfare of the people of the State of Missouri, or that would discredit or tend to discredit the Missouri gaming industry or the State of Missouri, including without limitation: (i) failing to comply with or make provision for compliance with the legislation, the rules promulgated thereunder or any federal, state or local law or regulation; (ii) failing to comply with any rules, order or ruling of the Missouri Gaming Commission or its agents pertaining to gaming; (iii) receiving goods or services from a person or business entity who does not hold a supplier’s license but who is required to hold such license by the legislation or the rules; (iv) being suspended or ruled ineligible or having a license revoked or suspended in any state or gaming jurisdiction; (v) associating with, either socially or in business affairs, or employing persons of notorious or unsavory reputation or who have extensive police records, or who have failed to cooperate with any officially constituted investigatory or administrative body and would adversely affect public confidence and trust in gaming; (vi) employing in any Missouri gaming operation any person known to have been found guilty of cheating or using any improper device in connection with any gambling game; (vii) use of fraud, deception, misrepresentation or bribery in securing any license or permit issued pursuant to the legislation; (viii) obtaining any fee, charge, or other compensation by fraud, deception or misrepresentation; and (ix) incompetence, misconduct, gross negligence, fraud, misrepresentation or dishonesty in the performance of the functions or duties regulated by the Missouri Riverboat Gambling Act.

 

Any transfer or issuance of ownership interest in a publicly held gaming licensee or its holding company that results in an entity owning, directly or indirectly, an aggregate ownership interest of 5% or more in the gaming licensee must be reported to the Missouri Gaming Commission within seven days. Further, any pledge or hypothecation of 5% or more of the ownership interest in a publicly held gaming licensee or its holding company must be reported to the Missouri Gaming Commission within seven days.

 

Every employee participating in a riverboat gaming operation must hold an occupational license. In addition, the Missouri Gaming Commission issues supplier’s licenses, which authorize the supplier licensee to sell or lease gaming equipment and supplies to any licensee involved in the operation of gaming activities.   Class A and Class B licensees may not be licensed as suppliers.

 

Riverboat gaming activities may only be conducted on, or within 1,000 feet of the main channel of, the Missouri River or Mississippi River. Although, all of the excursion gambling facilities in Missouri are permanently moored boats or impounded barges, a two hour simulated cruise is imposed in order to ensure the enforcement of loss limit restrictions. Missouri law imposes a maximum loss per person per cruise of $500. Minimum and maximum wagers on games are set by the licensee and wagering may be conducted only with a cashless wagering system, whereby money is converted to tokens, electronic cards or chips that can only be used for wagering. No person under the age of 21 is permitted to wager, and wagers may only be taken from a person present on a licensed excursion gambling boat.

 

The Missouri Riverboat Gambling Act imposes a 20% wagering tax on adjusted gross receipts (generally defined as gross receipts less winnings paid to wagerers) from gambling games. The tax imposed is to be paid by the licensee to the Commission on the day after the day when the wagers were made. Of the proceeds of that tax, 10% goes to the local government where the home dock is located, and the remainder goes to the State of Missouri.

 

9



 

The Missouri Riverboat Gambling Act also requires that licensees pay a $2.00 admission tax to the Missouri Gaming Commission for each person admitted to a gaming cruise. One dollar of the admission fee goes to the state and one dollar goes to the home dock city in which the licensee operates. The licensee is required to maintain public books and records clearly showing amounts received from admission fees, the total amount of gross receipts and the total amount of adjusted gross receipts. In addition, all local income, earnings, use, property and sales taxes are applicable to licensees. There have been from time to time pending before the Missouri General Assembly several proposed bills which individually or in combination would, if adopted, (1) remove the loss limit restriction, (2) adjust the amount of wagering tax imposed on adjusted gross receipts of licensees and/or (3) adjust the amount of admission tax paid by the licensee for each person admitted for a gaming cruise.

 

Iowa

 

In 1989, the State of Iowa legalized riverboat gaming on the Mississippi River and other waterways located in Iowa. The legislation authorized the granting of licenses to non-profit corporations that, in turn, are permitted to enter into operating agreements with qualified persons who also actually conduct riverboat gaming operations. Such operators must likewise be approved and licensed by the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission (the “Iowa Gaming Commission”).

 

The Isle-Bettendorf has the right to renew its operator’s contract with the Scott County Regional Authority, a non-profit corporation organized for the purpose of facilitating riverboat gaming in Bettendorf, Iowa, for succeeding three-year periods as long as Scott County voters approve gaming in the jurisdiction. Under the operator’s contract, the Isle-Bettendorf pays the Scott County Regional Authority a fee equal to 4.1% of the adjusted gross receipts. Further, the Isle-Bettendorf pays a fee to the City of Bettendorf equal to 1.65% of adjusted gross receipts.

 

In June 1994, Upper Mississippi Gaming Corporation, a non-profit corporation organized for the purpose of facilitating riverboat gaming in Marquette, Iowa, entered into an operator’s agreement for the Isle-Marquette for a period of twenty-five years. Under the management agreement, the non-profit organization is to be paid a fee of $0.50 per passenger. Further, pursuant to a dock site agreement (which also has a term of twenty-five years), the Isle-Marquette is required to pay a fee to the City of Marquette in the amount of $1.00 per passenger, plus a fixed amount of $15,000 per month and 2.5% of gaming revenues (less state wagering taxes) in excess of $20.0 million but less than $40.0 million; 5% of gaming revenues (less state wagering taxes) in excess of $40.0 million but less than $60.0 million; and 7.5% of gaming revenues (less state wagering taxes) in excess of $60.0 million.

 

In October 2000, the Riverboat Development Authority, a non-profit corporation entered into an operator’s agreement with the Isle-Davenport to conduct riverboat gaming in Davenport, Iowa. The operating agreement requires the Isle-Davenport to make weekly payments to the qualified sponsoring organization equal to 4.1% of each week’s adjusted gross receipts (as defined in the enabling legislation) provided that the Isle-Davenport has agreed that the qualifying sponsoring organization will be paid at least the minimum amount of $2,000,000. This agreement will remain in effect through March 31, 2009, provided that as long as Isle-Davenport has substantially complied with the Agreement, gaming laws and regulations and its agreements with the City of Davenport, the parties will enter into good faith negotiations for a new operator’s contract with reasonable equivalent economic terms to take effect April 1, 2009. In addition, the Isle-Davenport pays a docking fee, admission fee, gaming tax and a payment in lieu of taxes to the City of Davenport. Pursuant to a development agreement with the City, the Isle-Davenport has exclusive docking privileges in the City of Davenport until March 31, 2017 in consideration for this docking fee. The docking fee has both a fixed base and a per passenger increment. The fixed fee commenced April 1, 1994 at $111,759 and increases annually by 4%. The incremental component is a $0.10 charge for each passenger in excess of 1,117,579 passengers (which charge also increases by 4% per year). The City is also guaranteed an annual gaming tax of $558,789.50 per year (based on a minimum passenger floor count of 1,117,579 passengers at $0.50 per passenger). Finally, the Isle-Davenport is obligated to pay a payment in lieu of taxes to support the downtown development district. This annual lump sum payment is in the

 

10



 

amount of $123,516 plus $0.20 per passenger in excess of 1,117,579 passengers. This payment in lieu of taxes is further subject to a minimum $226,179 per year payment.

 

In November 2004, the Black Hawk County Gaming Association, a non-profit corporation organized for the purpose of facilitating riverboat gaming in Waterloo, Iowa entered into an operator’s agreement with the Isle-Waterloo to conduct riverboat gaming in Waterloo, Iowa. The operating agreement requires that upon commencement of operations the Isle-Waterloo is to make weekly payments to the qualified sponsoring organization equal to 4.1% of each week’s adjusted gross receipts and an additional fee of 1.65% of each week’s adjusted gross receipts in lieu of any admission or docking fee which might otherwise be charged by the county or any city (as defined in Section 99F.1(1) of the Iowa Code). This agreement will remain in effect through March 31, 2015 and may be extended by the Isle-Waterloo so long as it holds a license to conduct gaming. In addition, the Isle-Waterloo has agreed to pay a development fee to the City. Pursuant to an admission fee administration and development agreement with the City and Black Hawk County Gaming Association the Isle-Waterloo shall pay a development fee equal to 1% of each week’s adjusted gross receipts.

 

Iowa law permits gaming licensees to offer unlimited stakes gaming on games approved by the Iowa Gaming Commission on a 24-hour basis. Land-based casino gaming was authorized on July 1, 2007 and the Iowa Gaming Commission now permits licensees the option to operate on permanently moored vessels or approved gambling structures. The legal age for gaming is 21.

 

All Iowa licenses were approved for renewal at the March 6, 2008 Iowa Gaming Commission meeting. These licenses are not transferable and will need to be renewed in March 2009 and prior to the commencement of each subsequent annual renewal period.

 

The ownership and operation of gaming facilities in Iowa are subject to extensive state laws, regulations of the Iowa Gaming Commission and various county and municipal ordinances (collectively, the “Iowa Gaming Laws”), concerning the responsibility, financial stability and character of gaming operators and persons financially interested or involved in gaming operations. Iowa Gaming Laws seek to: (1) prevent unsavory or unsuitable persons from having direct or indirect involvement with gaming at any time or in any capacity; (2) establish and maintain responsible accounting practices and procedures; (3) maintain effective control over the financial practices of licensees (including the establishment of minimum procedures for internal fiscal affairs, the safeguarding of assets and revenues, the provision of reliable record keeping and the filing of periodic reports with the Iowa Gaming Commission); (4) prevent cheating and fraudulent practices; and (5) provide a source of state and local revenues through taxation and licensing fees. Changes in Iowa Gaming Laws could have a material adverse effect on the Iowa gaming operations.

 

Gaming licenses granted to individuals must be renewed every year, and licensing authorities have broad discretion with regard to such renewals. Licenses are not transferable. The Iowa gaming operations must submit detailed financial and operating reports to the Iowa Gaming Commission. Certain contracts of licensees in excess of $100,000 must be submitted to and approved by the Iowa Gaming Commission.

 

Certain officers, directors, managers and key employees of the Iowa gaming operations are required to be licensed by the Iowa Gaming Commission. Employees associated with gaming must obtain work permits that are subject to immediate suspension under specific circumstances. In addition, anyone having a material relationship or involvement with the Iowa gaming operations may be required to be found suitable or to be licensed, in which case those persons would be required to pay the costs and fees of the Iowa Gaming Commission in connection with the investigation. The Iowa Gaming Commission may deny an application for a license for any cause deemed reasonable. In addition to its authority to deny an application for license, the Iowa Gaming Commission has jurisdiction to disapprove a change in position by officers or key employees and the power to require the Iowa gaming operations to suspend or dismiss officers, directors or other key employees or sever relationships with other persons who refuse to file appropriate applications or whom the Iowa Gaming Commission finds unsuitable to act in such capacities.

 

The Iowa Gaming Commission may revoke a gaming license if the licensee:

 

·

 

has been suspended from operating a gaming operation in another jurisdiction by a board or

 

11



 

 

 

commission of that jurisdiction;

 

 

 

·

 

has failed to demonstrate financial responsibility sufficient to meet adequately the requirements of the gaming enterprise;

 

 

 

·

 

is not the true owner of the enterprise;

 

 

 

·

 

has failed to disclose ownership of other persons in the enterprise;

 

 

 

·

 

is a corporation 10% of the stock of which is subject to a contract or option to purchase at any time during the period for which the license was issued, unless the contract or option was disclosed to the Iowa Gaming Commission and the Iowa Gaming Commission approved the sale or transfer during the period of the license;

 

 

 

·

 

knowingly makes a false statement of a material fact to the Iowa Gaming Commission;

 

 

 

·

 

fails to meet a monetary obligation in connection with an excursion gaming boat;

 

 

 

·

 

pleads guilty to, or is convicted of a felony;

 

 

 

·

 

loans to any person, money or other thing of value for the purpose of permitting that person to wager on any game of chance;

 

 

 

·

 

is delinquent in the payment of property taxes or other taxes or fees or a payment of any other contractual obligation or debt due or owed to a city or county; or

 

 

 

·

 

assigns, grants or turns over to another person the operation of a licensed excursion boat (this provision does not prohibit assignment of a management contract approved by the Iowa Gaming Commission) or permits another person to have a share of the money received for admission to the excursion boat.

 

If it were determined that the Iowa Gaming Laws were violated by a licensee, the gaming licenses held by a licensee could be limited, made conditional, suspended or revoked. In addition, the licensee and the persons involved could be subject to substantial fines for each separate violation of the Iowa Gaming Laws in the discretion of the Iowa Gaming Commission. Limitations, conditioning or suspension of any gaming license could (and revocation of any gaming license would) have a material adverse effect on operations.

 

The Iowa Gaming Commission may also require any individual who has a material relationship with the Iowa gaming operations to be investigated and licensed or found suitable. The Iowa Gaming Commission, prior to the acquisition, must approve any person who acquires 5% or more of a licensee’s equity securities. The applicant stockholder is required to pay all costs of this investigation.

 

Gaming taxes approximating 22% of the adjusted gross receipts will be payable by each licensee on its operations to the State of Iowa. In addition, reimbursable assessments have been in an amount equal to 2.152% of each licensee’s adjusted gross receipts for fiscal year 2004. These assessments will be offset by future state gaming taxes paid by each licensee with a credit for 20% of the assessments paid allowed each year beginning July 1, 2010 for five consecutive years. The state of Iowa is also reimbursed by the licensees for all costs associated with monitoring and enforcement by the Iowa Gaming Commission and the Iowa Department of Criminal Investigation.

 

12



 

Colorado

 

The State of Colorado created the Division of Gaming (“Colorado Division”) within the Department of Revenue to license, implement, regulate and supervise the conduct of limited gaming under the Colorado Limited Gaming Act. The Director of the Colorado Division (“Colorado Director”), pursuant to regulations promulgated by, and subject to the review of, a five-member Colorado Limited Gaming Control Commission (“Colorado Commission”), has been granted broad power to ensure compliance with the Colorado gaming laws and regulations (collectively, the “Colorado Regulations”). The Colorado Director may inspect without notice, impound or remove any gaming device. The Colorado Director may examine and copy any licensee’s records, may investigate the background and conduct of licensees and their employees, and may bring disciplinary actions against licensees and their employees. The Colorado Director may also conduct detailed background investigations of persons who loan money to, or otherwise provide financing to, a licensee.

 

The Colorado Commission is empowered to issue five types of gaming and gaming-related licenses, and has delegated authority to the Colorado Director to issue certain types of licenses and approve certain changes in ownership. The licenses are revocable and non-transferable. The failure or inability of the Isle of Capri Black Hawk, LLC (“Isle-Black Hawk”) or CCSC/Blackhawk, Inc. (“Colorado Central Station-Black Hawk”) (each, a “Colorado Casino” or collectively, the “Colorado Casinos”), or the failure or inability of others associated with any of the Colorado Casinos, including us, to maintain necessary gaming licenses or approvals would have a material adverse effect on our operations. All persons employed by any of the Colorado Casinos, and involved, directly or indirectly, in gaming operations in Colorado also are required to obtain a Colorado gaming license. All licenses must be renewed every two years (prior to August 6, 2008, certain licenses had to be renewed annually.)

 

As a general rule, under the Colorado Regulations, no person may have an “ownership interest” in more than three retail gaming licenses in Colorado. The Colorado Commission has ruled that a person does not have an ownership interest in a retail gaming licensee for purposes of the multiple license prohibition if:

 

·

 

that person has less than a 5% ownership interest in an institutional investor that has an ownership interest in a publicly traded licensee or publicly traded company affiliated with a licensee;

 

 

 

·

 

a person has a 5% or more ownership interest in an institutional investor, but the institutional investor has less than a 5% ownership interest in a publicly traded licensee or publicly traded company affiliated with a licensee;

 

 

 

·

 

an institutional investor has less than a 5% ownership interest in a publicly traded licensee or publicly traded company affiliated with a licensee;

 

 

 

·

 

an institutional investor possesses voting securities in a fiduciary capacity for another person, and does not exercise voting control over 5% or more of the outstanding voting securities of a publicly traded licensee or of a publicly traded company affiliated with a licensee;

 

 

 

·

 

a registered broker or dealer retains possession of voting securities of a publicly traded licensee or of a publicly traded company affiliated with a licensee for its customers and not for its own account, and exercises voting rights for less than 5% of the outstanding voting securities of a publicly traded licensee or publicly traded company affiliated with a licensee;

 

 

 

·

 

a registered broker or dealer acts as a market maker for the stock of a publicly traded licensee or of a publicly traded company affiliated with a licensee and exercises voting rights in less than 5% of the outstanding voting securities of the publicly traded licensee or publicly traded company affiliated with a licensee;

 

 

 

·

 

an underwriter is holding securities of a publicly traded licensee or publicly traded company affiliated with a licensee as part of an underwriting for no more than 90 days after the beginning of such underwriting if it exercises voting rights of less than 5% of the outstanding voting securities

 

13



 

 

 

of a publicly traded licensee or publicly traded company affiliated with a licensee;

 

 

 

·

 

a book entry transfer facility holds voting securities for third parties, if it exercises voting rights with respect to less than 5% of the outstanding voting securities of a publicly traded licensee or publicly traded company affiliated with a licensee; or

 

 

 

·

 

a person’s sole ownership interest is less than 5% of the outstanding voting securities of the publicly traded licensee or publicly traded company affiliated with a licensee.

 

Because we own the Colorado Casinos, our business opportunities, and those of persons with an “ownership interest” in us, or any of the Colorado Casinos, are limited to interests that comply with the Colorado Regulations and the Colorado Commission’s rule.

 

In addition, pursuant to the Colorado Regulations, no manufacturer or distributor of slot machines or associated equipment may, without notification being provided to the Colorado Division within ten days, knowingly have an interest in any casino operator, allow any of its officers or any other person with a substantial interest in such business to have such an interest, employ any person if that person is employed by a casino operator, or allow any casino operator or person with a substantial interest therein to have an interest in a manufacturer’s or distributor’s business. A “substantial interest” means the lesser of (i) as large an interest in an entity as any other person or (ii) any financial or equity interest equal to or greater than 5%. The Colorado Commission has ruled that a person does not have a “substantial interest” if such person’s sole ownership interest in such licensee is through the ownership of less than 5% of the outstanding voting securities of a publicly traded licensee or publicly traded affiliated company of a licensee.

 

We are a “publicly traded corporation” under the Colorado Regulations.

 

Under the Colorado Regulations, any person or entity having any direct or indirect interest in a gaming licensee or an applicant for a gaming license, including, but not limited to, us, Casino America of Colorado, Inc., IC Holdings Colorado, Inc., IOC Black Hawk Distribution Company, LLC or either of the two Colorado Casinos and their security holders, may be required to supply the Colorado Commission with substantial information, including, but not limited to, background information, source of funding information, a sworn statement that such person or entity is not holding his or her interest for any other party, and fingerprints. Such information, investigation and licensing (or finding of suitability) as an “associated person” automatically will be required of all persons (other than certain institutional investors discussed below) which directly or indirectly beneficially own 10% or more of a direct or indirect beneficial ownership or interest in either of the two Colorado Casinos, through their beneficial ownership of any class of voting securities of us, Casino America of Colorado, Inc., IC Holdings Colorado, Inc., IOC Black Hawk Distribution Company, LLC or either of the two Colorado Casinos. Those persons must report their interest within 10 days (including institutional investors) and file appropriate applications within 45 days after acquiring that interest (other than certain institutional investors discussed below). Persons (including institutional investors) who directly or indirectly beneficially own 5% or more (but less than 10%) of a direct or indirect beneficial ownership or interest in either of the two Colorado Casinos, through their beneficial ownership of any class of voting securities of us, Casino America of Colorado, Inc., IC Holdings Colorado, Inc., IOC Black Hawk Distribution Company, LLC or either of the two Colorado Casinos, must report their interest to the Colorado Commission within 10 days after acquiring that interest and may be required to provide additional information and to be found suitable. (It is the current practice of the gaming regulators to require findings of suitability for persons beneficially owning 5% or more of a direct or indirect beneficial ownership or interest, other than certain institutional investors discussed below.) If certain institutional investors provide specified information to the Colorado Commission within 45 days after acquiring their interest (which, under the current practice of the gaming regulators is an interest of 5% or more, directly or indirectly) and are holding for investment purposes only, those investors,

 

14



 

in the Colorado Commission’s discretion, may be permitted to own up to 14.99% of the Colorado Casinos through their beneficial ownership in any class of voting of securities of us, Casino America of Colorado, Inc., IC Holdings Colorado, Inc., IOC Black Hawk Distribution Company, LLC or either of the two Colorado Casinos, before being required to be found suitable. All licensing and investigation fees will have to be paid by the person in question. The associated person investigation fee currently is $63 per hour.

 

The Colorado Regulations define a “voting security” to be a security the holder of which is entitled to vote generally for the election of a member or members of the board of directors or board of trustees of a corporation or a comparable person or persons of another form of business organization.

 

The Colorado Commission also has the right to request information from any person directly or indirectly interested in, or employed by, a licensee, and to investigate the moral character, honesty, integrity, prior activities, criminal record, reputation, habits and associations of: (1) all persons licensed pursuant to the Colorado Limited Gaming Act; (2) all officers, directors and stockholders of a licensed privately held corporation; (3) all officers, directors and stockholders holding either a 5% or greater interest or a controlling interest in a licensed publicly traded corporation; (4) all general partners and all limited partners of a licensed partnership; (5) all persons that have a relationship similar to that of an officer, director or stockholder of a corporation (such as members and managers of a limited liability company); (6) all persons supplying financing or loaning money to any licensee connected with the establishment or operation of limited gaming; (7) all persons having a contract, lease or ongoing financial or business arrangement with any licensee, where such contract, lease or arrangement relates to limited gaming operations, equipment devices or premises; and (8) all persons contracting with or supplying any goods and services to the gaming regulators.

 

Certain public officials and employees are prohibited from having any direct or indirect interest in a license or limited gaming.

 

In addition, under the Colorado Regulations, every person who is a party to a “gaming contract” (as defined below) or lease with an applicant for a license, or with a licensee, upon the request of the Colorado Commission or the Colorado Director, must promptly provide the Colorado Commission or Colorado Director all information that may be requested concerning financial history, financial holdings, real and personal property ownership, interests in other companies, criminal history, personal history and associations, character, reputation in the community and all other information that might be relevant to a determination of whether a person would be suitable to be licensed by the Colorado Commission. Failure to provide all information requested constitutes sufficient grounds for the Colorado Director or the Colorado Commission to require a licensee or applicant to terminate its “gaming contract” or lease with any person who failed to provide the information requested. In addition, the Colorado Director or the Colorado Commission may require changes in “gaming contracts” before an application is approved or participation in the contract is allowed. A “gaming contract” is defined as an agreement in which a person does business with or on the premises of a licensed entity.

 

The Colorado Commission and the Colorado Division have interpreted the Colorado Regulations to permit the Colorado Commission to investigate and find suitable persons or entities providing financing to or acquiring securities from us, Casino America of Colorado, Inc., IC Holdings Colorado, Inc., IOC Black Hawk Distribution Company, LLC or either of the two Colorado Casinos. As noted above, any person or entity required to file information, be licensed or found suitable would be required to pay the costs thereof and of any investigation. Although the Colorado Regulations do not require the prior approval for the execution of credit facilities or issuance of debt securities, the Colorado regulators reserve the right to approve, require changes to or require the termination of any financing, including if a person or entity is required to be found suitable and is not found suitable. In any event, lenders, note holders, and others providing financing will not be able to exercise certain rights and remedies without the prior approval of the Colorado gaming authorities. Information regarding lenders and holders of securities will be periodically reported to the Colorado gaming authorities.

 

15



 

Except under certain limited circumstances relating to slot machine manufacturers and distributors, every person supplying goods, equipment, devices or services to any licensee in return for payment of a percentage, or calculated upon a percentage, of limited gaming activity or income must obtain an operator license or be listed on the retailer’s license where such gaming will take place.

 

An application for licensure or suitability may be denied for any cause deemed reasonable by the Colorado Commission or the Colorado Director, as appropriate. Specifically, the Colorado Commission and the Colorado Director must deny a license to any applicant who, among other things: (1) fails to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the applicant is qualified; (2) fails to provide information and documentation requested; (3) fails to reveal any fact material to qualification, or supplies information which is untrue or misleading as to a material fact pertaining to qualification; (4) has been convicted of, or has a director, officer, general partner, stockholder, limited partner or other person who has a financial or equity interest in the applicant who has been convicted of, specified crimes, including the service of a sentence upon conviction of a felony in a correctional facility, city or county jail, or community correctional facility or under the state board of parole or any probation department within ten years prior to the date of the application, gambling-related offenses, theft by deception or crimes involving fraud or misrepresentation, is under current prosecution for such crimes (during the pendency of which license determination may be deferred), is a career offender or a member or associate of a career offender cartel, or is a professional gambler; or (5) has refused to cooperate with any state or federal body investigating organized crime, official corruption or gaming offenses. If the Colorado Commission determines that a person or entity is unsuitable to directly or indirectly own interests in us, Casino America of Colorado, Inc., IC Holdings Colorado, Inc., or either of the two Colorado Casinos, one or more of the Colorado Casinos may be sanctioned, which may include the loss of our approvals and licenses.

 

The Colorado Commission does not need to approve in advance a public offering of securities but rather requires the filing of notice and additional documents prior to a public offering of (i) voting securities, and (ii) non-voting securities if any of the proceeds will be used to pay for the construction of gaming facilities in Colorado, to directly or indirectly acquire an interest in a gaming facility in Colorado, to finance the operation of a gaming facility in Colorado or to retire or extend obligations for any of the foregoing. The Colorado Commission may, in its discretion, require additional information and prior approval of such public offering.

 

In addition, the Colorado Regulations prohibit a licensee or affiliated company thereof, such as us, Casino America of Colorado, Inc., IC Holdings Colorado, Inc., IOC Black Hawk Distribution Company, LLC or either of the two Colorado Casinos, from paying any unsuitable person any dividends or interest upon any voting securities or any payments or distributions of any kind (except as set forth below), or paying any unsuitable person any remuneration for services or recognizing the exercise of any voting rights by any unsuitable person. Further, under the Colorado Regulations, each of the Colorado Casinos and IOC Black Hawk Distribution Company, LLC may repurchase its voting securities from anyone found unsuitable at the lesser of the cash equivalent to the original investment in the applicable Colorado Casino or IOC Black Hawk Distribution Company, LLC or the current market price as of the date of the finding of unsuitability unless such voting securities are transferred to a suitable person (as determined by the Colorado Commission) within sixty (60) days after the finding of unsuitability. A licensee or affiliated company must pursue all lawful efforts to require an unsuitable person to relinquish all voting securities, including purchasing such voting securities. The staff of Colorado Division has taken the position that a licensee or affiliated company may not pay any unsuitable person any interest, dividends or other payments with respect to non-voting securities, other than with respect to pursuing all lawful efforts to require an unsuitable person to relinquish non-voting securities, including by purchasing or redeeming such securities. Further, the regulations require anyone with a material involvement with a licensee, including a director or officer of a holding company, such as us, Casino America of Colorado, Inc., IC Holdings Colorado, Inc., IOC Black Hawk Distribution Company, LLC or either of the two Colorado Casinos, to file for a finding of suitability if required by the Colorado Commission.

 

Because of their authority to deny an application for a license or suitability, the Colorado Commission and the Colorado Director effectively can disapprove a change in corporate position of a licensee and with respect to any entity which is required to be found suitable, or indirectly can cause us, Casino America of Colorado, Inc., IC Holdings Colorado, Inc., IOC Black Hawk Distribution Company, LLC or the applicable

 

16



 

Colorado Casino to suspend or dismiss managers, officers, directors and other key employees or sever relationships with other persons who refuse to file appropriate applications or who the authorities find unsuitable to act in such capacities.

 

Generally, a sale, lease, purchase, conveyance or acquisition of any interest in a licensee is prohibited without the Colorado Commission’s prior approval. However, because we are a publicly traded corporation, persons may acquire an interest in us (even, under current staff interpretations, a controlling interest) without the Colorado Commission’s prior approval, but such persons may be required to file notices with the Colorado Commission and applications for suitability (as discussed above) and the Colorado Commission may, after such acquisition, find such person unsuitable and require them to dispose of their interest. Under some circumstances, we may not sell any interest in our Colorado gaming businesses without the prior approval of the Colorado Commission.

 

Each Colorado Casino must meet specified architectural requirements, fire safety standards and standards for access for disabled persons. Each Colorado Casino also must not exceed specified gaming square footage limits as a total of each floor and the full building. Each Colorado Casino may operate only between 8:00 a.m. and 2:00 a.m., and may permit only individuals 21 or older to gamble in the casino. It may permit slot machines, blackjack and poker, with a maximum single bet of $5.00. No Colorado Casino may provide credit to its gaming patrons.  Each Colorado Casino must comply with Colorado’s Gambling Payment Intercept Act, which governs the collection of unpaid child support costs on certain cash winnings from limited gaming.

 

A licensee is required to provide information and file periodic reports with the Colorado Division, including identifying those who have a 5% or greater ownership, financial or equity interest in the licensee, or who have the ability to control the licensee, or who have the ability to exercise significant influence over the licensee, or who loan money or other things of value to a licensee, or who have the right to share in revenues of limited gaming, or to whom any interest or share in profits of limited gaming has been pledged as security for a debt or performance of an act. A licensee, and any parent company or subsidiary of a licensee, who has applied to a foreign jurisdiction for licensure or permission to conduct gaming, or who possesses a license to conduct foreign gaming, is required to notify the Colorado Division. Any person licensed by the Colorado Commission and any associated person of a licensee must report criminal convictions and criminal charges to the Colorado Division.

 

The Colorado Commission has broad authority to sanction, fine, suspend and revoke a license for violations of the Colorado Regulations. Violations of many provisions of the Colorado Regulations also can result in criminal penalties.

 

The Colorado Constitution currently permits gaming only in a limited number of cities and certain commercial districts in such cities.

 

The Colorado Constitution permits a gaming tax of up to 40% on adjusted gross gaming proceeds, and authorizes the Colorado Commission to change the rate annually. The current gaming tax rate is 0.25% on adjusted gross gaming proceeds of up to and including $2.0 million, 2% over $2.0 million up to and including $4.0 million, 4% over $4.0 million up to and including $5.0 million, 11% over $5.0 million up to and including $10.0 million, 16% over $10.0 million up to and including $15.0 million and 20% on adjusted gross gaming proceeds in excess of $15.0 million. The City of Black Hawk has imposed an annual device fee of $750 per gaming device and may revise it from time to time. The City of Black Hawk also has imposed other fees, including a business improvement district fee and transportation fee, calculated based on the number of devices and may revise the same or impose additional such fees.

 

Colorado participates in multi-state lotteries.

 

The sale of alcoholic beverages is subject to licensing, control and regulation by the Colorado liquor agencies. All persons who directly or indirectly hold a 10% or more interest in, or 10% or more of the issued and outstanding capital stock of, any of the Colorado Casinos, through their ownership of us, Casino America of Colorado, Inc., IC Holdings Colorado, Inc., or either of the two Colorado Casinos, must file

 

17



 

applications and possibly be investigated by the Colorado liquor agencies. The Colorado liquor agencies also may investigate those persons who, directly or indirectly, loan money to or have any financial interest in liquor licensees. In addition, there are restrictions on stockholders, directors and officers of liquor licensees preventing such persons from being a stockholder, director, officer or otherwise interested in some persons lending money to liquor licensees and from making loans to other liquor licensees. All licenses are revocable and transferable only in accordance with all applicable laws. The Colorado liquor agencies have the full power to limit, condition, suspend or revoke any liquor license and any disciplinary action could (and revocation would) have a material adverse effect upon the operations of us, Casino America of Colorado, Inc., IC Holdings Colorado, Inc., or the applicable Colorado Casino. Each Colorado Casino holds a retail gaming tavern liquor license for its casino, hotel and restaurant operations.

 

Persons directly or indirectly interested in either of the two Colorado Casinos may be limited in certain other types of liquor licenses in which they may have an interest, and specifically cannot have an interest in a retail liquor license (but may have an interest in a hotel and restaurant liquor license and several other types of liquor licenses). No person can hold more than three retail gaming tavern liquor licenses. The remedies of certain lenders may be limited by applicable liquor laws and regulations.

 

Florida

 

In June 1995, the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, acting through the Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering (the “Florida Division”), issued its final order approving the transfer to the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, PPI, Inc. (“PPI”), the pari-mutuel wagering permits which authorize the acceptance of pari-mutuel wagers on harness horse and quarterhorse races conducted at the Pompano Park Racetrack (“Pompano Park”) located in Pompano Beach, Florida. Harness horse racing at Pompano Park has been continuously conducted by PPI since the time it acquired the foregoing described harness horse permit through the present. In February 2007, The Florida Division issued a license to PPI to conduct 180 live evening harness racing performances at Pompano Park during the State of Florida’s fiscal year beginning July 1, 2007 to June 30, 2008. PPI may also conduct quaterhorse racing operations, subject to Florida Division approval.

 

The Florida statutes and the applicable rules and regulations of the Florida Division set forth in the Florida Administrative Code (the “Florida Law”) establish a regulatory framework for pari-mutuel wagering activities in the State of Florida, including licensing requirements, a taxing structure on pari-mutuel permitholders and requirements for payments to the horsemen, including owners and breeders. The Florida Law grants to the Florida Division full regulatory power over all permitholders and licensees, including the power to revoke or suspend any permit or license upon the willful violation by a permitholder or a licensee of the Florida Law. The Florida Division must approve any transfer of 10% or more of the stock or other evidence of ownership or equity in all pari-mutuel racing permitholders such as PPI. In addition to the power to suspend or revoke a permit or license on account of a willful violation of the Florida Law, the Florida Division is also granted the power to impose various civil penalties on the permitholder or licensee on account of other violations. Penalties may not exceed $1,000 for each count or separate offense.

 

Pursuant to the Florida Law, PPI is also authorized to conduct full-card pari-mutuel wagering on: (1) simulcast harness races from outside Florida throughout the racing season; and (2) night-time (after 6 p.m.) thoroughbred races conducted outside of the State of Florida if such races are simulcast into Florida by one of the Florida thoroughbred permitholders. PPI also has the right under the Florida Law to conduct full-card simulcasting of harness racing on days during which no live racing is held at Pompano Park. However, on non-race days, Pompano Park must offer to rebroadcast the foregoing simulcast signals to certain other pari-mutuel facilities located within 25 miles of Pompano Park. In addition, Pompano Park may transmit its live harness races into any dog racing or jai alai facility in Florida, including facilities in Miami-Dade and Broward Counties, for intertrack wagering. The Florida Law establishes the allocation of the pari-mutuel commission between Pompano Park and the other facilities receiving such signals.

 

The Florida Law authorizes pari-mutuel facilities such as Pompano Park to operate card rooms in those counties in which a majority vote of the County Commission has been obtained and a local ordinance has

 

18



 

been adopted. The County Commission in Broward County, where Pompano Park is located, has approved the operation of cardrooms in Broward County. Although the provisions of the Florida Law regarding cardroom operations have been amended frequently by the Florida Legislature, the amendments have generally resulted in the regulatory scheme becoming more liberal as opposed to being more restrictive. Under the most recent amendments which became effective on July 1, 2007, the beneficial changes included permitting daily operations for any 12 hour period without the requirement for live racing,  raising the limit on the maximum bet amount from $2.00 to $5.00 with up to 3 raises allowed per round, providing less restrictive regulations for tournaments and allowing the operator to award prizes and create jackpots not tied to the amount bet.

 

In November 2004, the voters in the State of Florida amended the Florida State Constitution to allow the voters of Miami-Dade and Broward Counties to decide whether to approve slot machines in racetracks and jai alai frontons in their respective counties. Broward County voters approved that county’s local referendum in March 2005. Legislation enacted by the Florida Legislature in 2006, and amended in 2007, became effective (the “Florida Slot Law”) which implemented the constitutional amendment by authorizing Pompano Park and three other pari-mutuel facilities in Broward and Dade County to offer slot machine gaming to patrons at these facilities. Although there are pari-mutuel facilities in numerous other counties in the State of Florida, slot machine gaming is presently authorized only in Broward and Dade County. In April 2007, a new casino facility was opened at Pompano Park adjacent to the harness race facility.

 

Under the Florida Slot law, the following regulatory provisions are applicable to slot machine gaming at Pompano Park:

 

·

 

The facility may be operated 365 days per year, 18 hours per weekday and 24 hours on weekends.

 

 

 

·

 

The maximum number of machines is 2,000 Vegas-style (Class III) slot machines per facility.

 

 

 

·

 

The annual license fee is $3,000,000.00.

 

 

 

·

 

The tax payable to the State of Florida is 50% of net slot machine revenue.

 

 

 

·

 

The machines will not accept coins or currency, but are ticket in/ticket out.

 

 

 

·

 

The minimum age to play the machines is 21 years.

 

 

 

·

 

ATMs are permitted in the facility but not on the gaming floor.

 

 

 

·

 

The Florida Division is the regulatory agency charged with the duty to enforce the provisions of the Florida Law.

 

PPI also pays combined county and city taxes of approximately 3.5% on the first $250 million of net slot machine revenue and 5% on net slot machine revenue over $250 million.

 

There is currently litigation pending which could impact PPI’s rights to conduct slot machine operations in Florida. The Florida District Court of Appeal First District affirmed its earlier decision to reverse a lower court decision granting summary judgment in favor of Floridians for a Level Playing Field (FLPF), of which we are a member. The Court ruled that a trial is necessary to determine whether FLPF failed to obtain the required number of signatures to place the constitutional amendment authorizing slot machines on the ballot approved by voters.  The case has recently been sent for trial to the Leon County Circuit Court.. We believe that  at trial FLPF would prevail on the merits. However, if FLPF is ultimately unsuccessful in the litigation, the statewide vote amending the Florida constitution to permit slot machines at pari-mutuels would be invalidated and our right to operate slot machines at Pompano Park could be eliminated.

 

19



 

Bahamas

 

In 1969, the Government of The Bahamas enacted the Lotteries and Gaming Act. This legislation, together with its regulations, governs and regulates gaming. The Gaming Board is the body that regulates the operation of casinos. The gaming license is renewable annually. All casino workers must be approved by the Board and are issued certificates, which are also renewable on an annual basis. There is a basic annual gaming tax of $200,000 payable in six equal shares. In addition a winnings tax is also imposed and is based on the following scale:

 

Winnings of:

$ 10,000,000

 

25

%

 

$ 10,000,001 - $16,000,000

 

20

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

$ 16,000,001 - $20,000,000

 

10

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts exceeding $20,000,001

 

5

%

 

The Minister of Tourism has responsibility for gaming and acts in consultation with the Gaming Board. A license can be cancelled if a fraudulent or misleading representation has been supplied to the Board or if there is a breach of restrictions or conditions imposed by the Minister. There is however a right to be heard before cancellation is made final. Citizens, permanent residents and holders of work permits are prohibited from gambling. Those found doing so are guilty of an offense punishable by law. The operator may also be liable if it knowingly allows any such persons to gamble in its establishment.

 

Currently the Casino has an agreement to lease the premises housing its operations and a management agreement. The Casino holds a number of other licenses including one with the Port Authority of Grand Bahama, a business license and liquor and dining and dancing licenses.

 

On the 24 th April,2007 the Isle entered into a Supplemental Heads of Agreement with the Government of the Bahamas and Hutchison Lucaya Ltd.,wherein certain concessions were granted to the Isle with respect to marketing subsidy and a reduction in gaming taxes. Such taxes were reduced to 7.5% of gross win per annum. The basic tax of $200,000 remains payable per annum.

 

United Kingdom

 

Gaming in the UK is subject to regulation under the Gambling Act (the “Act”) which  received the Royal assent on April 7, 2005 and which  came  into force in its entirety on September 1, 2007, replacing the Gaming Act 1968. Under the Act, a new Gambling Commission (the “Commission”) has been created to oversee license applications and establish new regulations for gaming (including on-line gaming). It has taken over responsibilities from the Gaming Board and is working on the transition to meet this objective. The legislation will provide a significant change in regulation of the casino industry including:

 

·

 

removing the requirement that gaming facilities operate as private members’ clubs, including the statutorily prescribed 24-hour interval between membership and play; this has now occurred;

 

 

 

·

 

extending the gaming products available;

 

 

 

·

 

abolishing the demand test and permitted area rules;

 

 

 

·

 

allowing casinos specific numbers of gaming machines with a broader range of stakes and prizes;

 

 

 

·

 

allowing casinos to offer live entertainment and to advertise; and

 

 

 

·

 

allowing new categories of regional, large and small casinos.

 

20



 

The Act is accompanied by a significant body of detailed regulation, codes of practice, and guidance, which together with the Act will form the regulatory and compliance backdrop to gaming in the UK. The Act limited the number of regional casinos to 1 and large and small to 8 each. The Government appointed a Casino Advisory Panel to make recommendations to the Government as to location of the 17 proposed new casinos; however the initial secondary legislation designed to implement the panel’s recommendation did not pass.   This has now been approved by Parliament in relation to 8 large and 8 small casinos.  Currently there are no plans to proceed with a Regional Casino.

 

There are detailed transitional provisions in relation to existing operators, what they needed to do prior to September 1, 2007 in order to keep existing licenses current and/or convert to new licenses.

 

The Company is an existing operator and is currently engaged in taking the necessary steps to maintain/convert its existing permissions in relation to its UK operations, The Isle Casinos Ltd and Blue Chip Casinos Ltd.

 

The Commission is primarily responsible for regulating casinos in the UK and is authorized to enforce strict codes of responsibility and is responsible for granting operating and personal licenses to commercial gambling operators and personnel working in the industry. The Commission will share, with local licensing authorities, responsibility for granting gaming and betting permissions.

 

Authority to provide facilities for gambling will be subject to varying degrees of regulation, depending on:

 

·

 

Type of gambling

 

 

 

·

 

Means by which it is conducted

 

 

 

·

 

People by whom and to whom it is offered

 

The Act removes from licensing justices all responsibility for granting gaming and betting permissions (except for certain 1968 Act transitional applications). Instead, the Commission and licensing authorities will between them assume responsibility for all those matters previously regulated by licensing justices.

 

The Act establishes a minimum size limit for new casinos and a casino’s gaming machine entitlement will depend on its category, and power is provided for licensing authorities to pass resolutions not to license any new casino premises in their area.

 

The Act introduces a new regime for gaming machines. A new definition of gaming machine is provided, together with power to prescribe categories. The Act provides certain entitlements for commercial operators to use specified numbers and categories of machines in consequence of their licenses. It also establishes permit procedures for authorizing use of lower-stake gaming machines in specific locations.

 

The Act makes provision for the advertising of gambling, creating new offences relating to the advertising of unlawful gambling and providing reserve powers for the Secretary of State to make regulations controlling the content of gambling advertisements.   A voluntary code is currently in force covering gambling advertisements.

 

The acquisition of a 10% equity stake, or the ability to exercise significant influence over the management of the operator where there is a lower stake, will trigger the Controller provisions under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. This will require notification and consent by the Commission or Regulator who will apply a number of tests to ensure that the relevant person is fit and proper, that the interests of the entity are not threatened and that compliance conditions are satisfied.

 

We operate casinos in Coventry, Dudley and Wolverhampton under the  Gambling Act and are dealing with the formalities for continuation rights under the Act

 

21



 

Non-Gaming Regulation

 

We are subject to certain federal, state and local safety and health, employment and environmental laws, regulations and ordinances that apply to non-gaming businesses generally, such as the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, Occupational Safety and Health Act, Resource Conservation Recovery Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act and the Oil Pollution Act of 1990. We have not made, and do not anticipate making, material expenditures with respect to such environmental laws and regulations. However, the coverage and attendant compliance costs associated with such laws, regulations and ordinances may result in future additional costs to our operations. For example, the Department of Transportation has promulgated regulations under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 requiring owners and operators of certain vessels to establish through the Coast Guard evidence of financial responsibility for clean up of oil pollution. This requirement has been satisfied by proof of adequate insurance.

 

Our riverboats operated in Louisiana and Iowa must comply with U.S. Coast Guard requirements as to boat design, on-board facilities, equipment, personnel and safety and hold U.S. Coast Guard Certificates of Documentation and Inspection. The U.S. Coast Guard requirements also set limits on the operation of the riverboats and require licensing of certain personnel involved with the operation of the riverboats. Loss of a riverboat’s Certificate of Documentation and Inspection could preclude its use as a riverboat casino. Each of our riverboats is inspected annually and, every five years, is subject to dry-docking for inspection of its hull, which could result in a temporary loss of service.

 

The barges are inspected by third parties and certified with respect to stability and single compartment flooding integrity. Our casino barges must also meet local fire safety standards. We would incur additional costs if any of our gaming facilities were not in compliance with one or more of these regulations.

 

Regulations adopted by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the U.S. Treasury Department require us to report currency transactions in excess of $10,000 occurring within a gaming day, including identification of the patron by name and social security number. U.S. Treasury Department regulations also require us to report certain suspicious activity, including any transaction that exceeds $5,000 if we know, suspect or have reason to believe that the transaction involves funds from illegal activity or is designed to evade federal regulations or reporting requirements. Substantial penalties can be imposed against us if we fail to comply with these regulations.

 

All of our shipboard employees, even those who have nothing to do with our operation as a vessel, such as dealers, waiters and security personnel, may be subject to the Jones Act which, among other things, exempts those employees from state limits on workers’ compensation awards.

 

22