UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

x

 

QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

 

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008

 

 

 

o

 

TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from              to          

 

Commission File Number: 001-32986

 

General Moly, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

DELAWARE

 

91-0232000

(State or other jurisdiction

 

(I.R.S. Employer

of incorporation or organization)

 

Identification No.)

 

1726 Cole Blvd., Suite 115
Lakewood, CO 80401
Telephone:  (303) 928-8599
(Address and telephone number of principal executive offices)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for at least the past 90 days.  YES  x  NO  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

o

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

x

o

Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  YES  o  NO  x

 

The number of shares outstanding of registrant’s common stock as of October 27, 2008 was 71,842,646.

 

 

 



 

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1.                                                      FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

GENERAL MOLY, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

(Unaudited - Dollars in thousands except per share amounts)

 

 

 

September 30,
2008

 

December 31,
2007

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

CURRENT ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

79,508

 

$

78,371

 

Restricted cash – Eureka Moly, LLC

 

41,578

 

 

Deposits, prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

441

 

360

 

Total Current Assets

 

121,527

 

78,731

 

Mining properties, land and water rights

 

63,802

 

29,578

 

Deposits on property, plant and equipment

 

23,339

 

490

 

Restricted cash held for electricity transmission

 

12,545

 

 

Restricted cash held for reclamation bonds

 

1,132

 

777

 

Property and equipment, net

 

809

 

711

 

Other assets

 

2,994

 

 

TOTAL ASSETS

 

$

226,148

 

$

110,287

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES, MINORITY INTEREST AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

CURRENT LIABILITIES

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

$

10,408

 

$

7,457

 

Provision for post closure reclamation and remediation costs

 

90

 

90

 

Current portion of long term debt

 

109

 

62

 

Total Current Liabilities

 

10,607

 

7,609

 

Provision for post closure reclamation and remediation costs, net of current portion

 

641

 

422

 

Long term debt, net of current portion

 

296

 

151

 

Total Liabilities

 

11,544

 

8,182

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES – NOTE 9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MINORITY INTEREST

 

100,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding

 

 

 

Common stock, $0.001 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized, 71,509,313 and 66,131,384 shares issued and outstanding, respectively

 

72

 

66

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

184,147

 

159,828

 

Accumulated deficit before exploration stage

 

(213

)

(213

)

Accumulated deficit during exploration and development stage

 

(69,402

)

(57,576

)

Total Stockholders’ Equity

 

114,604

 

102,105

 

TOTAL LIABILITIES, MINORITY INTEREST AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

$

226,148

 

$

110,287

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

2



 

GENERAL MOLY, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited - In thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

January 1, 2002
(Inception of
Exploration
Stage) to

 

 

 

September 30, 
2008

 

September 30, 
2007

 

September 30, 
2008

 

September
30, 2007

 

September 30,
2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REVENUES

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

OPERATING EXPENSES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exploration and evaluation

 

1,084

 

6,028

 

5,270

 

16,183

 

36,305

 

General and administrative expense

 

2,204

 

6,374

 

8,119

 

15,306

 

36,965

 

TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES

 

3,288

 

12,402

 

13,389

 

31,489

 

73,270

 

LOSS FROM OPERATIONS

 

(3,288

)

(12,402

)

(13,389

)

(31,489

)

(73,270

)

OTHER INCOME

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest and dividend income

 

530

 

346

 

1,563

 

875

 

3,803

 

Realized gains

 

 

 

 

 

65

 

TOTAL OTHER INCOME

 

530

 

346

 

1,563

 

875

 

3,868

 

LOSS BEFORE TAXES

 

(2,758

)

(12,056

)

(11,826

)

(30,614

)

(69,402

)

INCOME TAXES

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET LOSS

 

$

(2,758

)

$

(12,056

)

$

(11,826

)

$

(30,614

)

$

(69,402

)

BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK

 

$

(0.04

)

$

(0.22

)

$

(0.17

)

$

(0.60

)

 

 

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING BASIC AND DILUTED

 

71,353

 

55,979

 

69,663

 

51,193

 

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

3



 

GENERAL MOLY, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

(Unaudited – In thousands)

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

1-Jan-02
(Inception of
Exploration
Stage) to

 

 

 

September 30,
2008

 

September 30,
2007

 

September 30,
2008

 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(11,826

)

$

(30,614

)

$

(69,402

)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Services and expenses paid with common stock

 

 

304

 

1,990

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

225

 

129

 

483

 

Equity compensation for employees and directors

 

2,029

 

5,546

 

11,556

 

Decrease (increase) in deposits, prepaid expenses and other

 

53

 

49

 

(349

)

(Increase) in restricted cash held for electricity transmission

 

(12,545

)

 

(12,545

)

Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

2,951

 

7,464

 

10,385

 

Increase in post closure reclamation and remediation costs

 

219

 

312

 

522

 

Net cash used by operating activities

 

(18,894

)

(16,810

)

(57,360

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Payments for the purchase of equipment

 

(457

)

(752

)

(1,300

)

Purchase of securities

 

 

 

(137

)

Purchase and development of mining properties, land and water rights

 

(32,422

)

(8,675

)

(58,787

)

Deposits on property, plant and equipment

 

(22,849

)

 

(23,339

)

Decrease (increase) in restricted cash held for reclamation bonds

 

(355

)

(50

)

(641

)

Cash provided by sale of marketable securities

 

 

 

246

 

Net cash used by investing activities

 

(56,083

)

(9,477

)

(83,958

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from issuance of stock, net of issuance costs

 

20,494

 

32,485

 

165,024

 

Cash proceeds from POS-Minerals Corporation

 

100,000

 

 

100,000

 

Cash paid to POS-Minerals Corporation for purchase price adjustment

 

(2,994

)

 

(2,994

)

(Increase) in restricted cash – Eureka Moly, LLC

 

(41,578

)

 

(41,578

)

Net increase in debt

 

192

 

47

 

328

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

76,114

 

32,532

 

220,780

 

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

1,137

 

6,245

 

79,462

 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

 

78,371

 

17,882

 

46

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

 

$

79,508

 

$

24,127

 

$

79,508

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity compensation capitalized as development

 

$

1,801

 

$

 

$

3,605

 

Restricted cash held for reclamation bond acquired in an acquisition

 

 

491

 

491

 

Post closure reclamation and remediation costs and accounts payable assumed in an acquisition

 

 

263

 

263

 

Common stock and warrants issued for property and equipment

 

 

826

 

1,586

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

4



 

GENERAL MOLY, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

 

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

NOTE 1 — DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

 

General Moly, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” “the Company,” or “General Moly”) is a Delaware corporation originally incorporated as General Mines Corporation on November 23, 1925.  In 1966, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to change its name to Idaho General Petroleum and Mines Corporation, and amended its articles again in 1967, changing its name to Idaho General Mines, Inc. On October 5, 2007, we reincorporated in the State of Delaware (the “Reincorporation”) through a merger involving Idaho General Mines, Inc. and General Moly, Inc., a Delaware corporation that was a wholly owned subsidiary of Idaho General Mines, Inc. The Reincorporation was effected by merging Idaho General Mines, Inc. with and into General Moly, with General Moly being the surviving entity.  For purposes of the Company’s reporting status with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, General Moly is deemed a successor to Idaho General Mines, Inc.

 

We were in the exploration stage until October 4, 2007 when our Board of Directors (the “Board”) approved the development of the Mt. Hope molybdenum property (the “Mt. Hope Project”) in Eureka County, Nevada.  The Company is now in the development stage and is currently proceeding with the development of the Mt. Hope Project.  We are also conducting exploration and evaluation activities on our Liberty molybdenum property (the “Liberty Property” formerly referred to as the “Hall-Tonopah Property”) in Nye County, Nevada.

 

Effective as of January 1, 2008, we contributed all of our interest in the assets related to the Mt. Hope Project, including our lease of the Mt. Hope Project, into a newly formed entity, Eureka Moly, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Eureka Moly”), and in February 2008 (the “Closing Date”) entered into a joint venture for the development and operation of the Mt. Hope Project (the “Joint Venture”) with POS-Minerals Corporation (“POS-Minerals”) an affiliate of POSCO, a large Korean steel company.  Under the Joint Venture, POS-Minerals owns a 20% interest in Eureka Moly and General Moly, through a wholly owned subsidiary, owns an 80% interest.

 

The interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company are unaudited.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments and disclosures necessary for a fair presentation of these interim statements have been included.  All such adjustments are, in the opinion of management, of a normal recurring nature.  The results reported in these interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be reported for the entire year.  These interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007.

 

Certain amounts for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 have been reclassified to conform to the 2008 presentation.

 

NOTE 2 — LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS

 

On October 4, 2007, the Board approved the development of the Mt. Hope Project as contemplated in our Bankable Feasibility Study (the “Bankable Feasibility Study”).  The Company has completed basic engineering of the Mt. Hope Project and has updated its Bankable Feasibility Study based upon having completed 25% of the engineering.

 

The development of the Mt. Hope Project has an estimated total capital requirement ranging from approximately $1.1 billion to $1.2 billion, comprised of initial development costs of approximately $1,040.0 million (in 2008 dollars); $65.0 million in cash bonding requirements; $26.0 million in Advance Royalty Payments (as hereinafter defined); $16.0 million in pre-payments and amounts necessary for working capital.  Depending on the ultimate capital structure to finance the project, additional costs may be incurred related to financing.  Through September 30, 2008, Eureka Moly has placed approximately $228.5 million in equipment orders and has pre-paid $12.6 million into an escrow arrangement for electricity transmission services.  The original estimated total capital

 

5



 

requirement was approximately $1.0 billion, comprised of initial development costs in excess of $850.0 million (in 2007 dollars); $53.0 million in cash bonding requirements; $22.0 million in Advance Royalty Payments; and amounts necessary for working capital.  The total increase in the estimated initial development costs compared with the August 2007 Bankable Feasibility Study amount was primarily a result of increases to construction labor rates, commodity prices (primarily fuel costs), indirect construction costs, increase in quantity for construction materials and Company salary and wages.

 

In February 2008, we entered into the Joint Venture, the terms of which reduced our funding requirements for the Mt. Hope Project by up to 20%.  Under the terms of the Joint Venture, POS-Minerals is required to provide up to $170.0 million and 20% of the costs incurred after January 1, 2008.  Of the $170.0 million, $50.0 million was received in February 2008, $50.0 million was received in June 2008, and the remaining $70.0 million and 20% of the costs incurred after the Closing Date (the “Third Contribution Amount”) is to be received once the Mt. Hope Project receives the necessary permits to develop and operate the Mt. Hope Project (the “POS-Minerals Third Contribution Date”).  Until the POS-Minerals Third Contribution Date, we are required to fund development costs of the Mt. Hope Project that in the aggregate exceed previous POS-Minerals contributions.  The obligations of POS-Minerals to contribute the Third Contribution Amount may be reduced or eliminated if the necessary permits to develop and operate the Mt. Hope project are not received by December 31, 2009.

 

Additional capital will be required through the commencement of Mt. Hope processing which is estimated to begin in late 2010.  Our ability to develop the project on time and on budget is dependent on, among other things, the permitting process and our ability to raise the necessary capital to fund the Mt. Hope Project both in sufficient amount and in a timely manner.  Additionally, if the currently estimated costs of the Mt. Hope Project are exceeded we will need to raise additional capital to fund such overruns.

 

We do not currently have the capital necessary to complete the Mt. Hope Project and, accordingly, plan to raise the capital on an ongoing basis when needed.  We currently estimate needing between $600-$700 million to fully finance the Mt. Hope project.  The Company is currently, and will on an ongoing basis be, pursuing the most efficient sources of funding for the project including, but not limited to, the equity markets, the bank project finance markets and the high yield capital debt markets.  The Company is also evaluating additional support from current strategic partners, the possibility of a sale of another minority interest in the Mt. Hope project to other strategic partners, debt from private investment groups as well as the continued monitoring of the capital markets as potential sources of interim project financing needs.  Recent disruptions in national and international credit markets have led to very illiquid and volatile conditions.  There is a scarcity of credit and lenders are imposing tighter lending standards and higher interest rates on loans.  Our ability to obtain the necessary funding for the Mt. Hope Project as well as the terms for such funding may be adversely affected by these disruptions in the credit markets.  Our existing cash on hand at September 30, 2008 should be sufficient to fund planned operations for the Mt. Hope Project, as well as our other planned operations through the first quarter of 2009.  If we are unable to raise capital when needed, it will be necessary to develop alternative plans that could delay the development and completion of the Mt. Hope Project.  There is no assurance that we will be able to obtain the necessary financing for the Mt. Hope Project on terms acceptable to us, or at all.

 

In September 2008 we appointed Barclays Capital and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC as co-lead project finance arrangers to structure and arrange the financing package for the Mt. Hope Project.

 

We also require capital to continue the exploration and evaluation of the Liberty Property, as well as continue payment of ongoing general and administrative costs associated with supporting our planned operations.

 

NOTE 3 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

This summary of significant accounting policies is presented to assist in understanding the financial statements.  The financial statements and notes are representations of the Company’s management, which is responsible for their integrity and objectivity.  These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the financial statements.

 

Accounting Method

 

Our financial statements are prepared using the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with U.S. GAAP.  At December 31, 2007, all of our subsidiaries were wholly owned.  In February 2008, we entered into the Joint Venture which establishes our ownership interest in Eureka Moly at 80%.  At September 30, 2008, the consolidated financial

 

6



 

statements include all of our wholly owned subsidiaries and Eureka Moly.  The POS-Minerals contributions attributable to their 20% interest are shown as Minority Interest in the financial statements.

 

Estimates

 

The process of preparing financial statements requires the use of estimates and assumptions regarding certain types of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses.  Such estimates primarily relate to unsettled transactions and events as of the date of the financial statements.  Accordingly, upon settlement, actual results may differ from estimated amounts.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

We consider all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.  The restricted cash of Eureka Moly represents the unspent amount of the POS-Minerals contributions, which are available for the continuing development of the Mt. Hope Project.

 

Exploration and Development Stage Activities

 

We were in the exploration stage from January 2002 until October 4, 2007.  On October 4, 2007, our Board approved the development of the Mt. Hope Project as contemplated in the Bankable Feasibility Study and we then entered into the Development Stage.  We have not realized any revenue from operations.  We will be primarily engaged in development of the Mt. Hope Project and exploration and evaluation of the Liberty Property until we enter the production stage.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

Our financial instruments as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” include cash, restricted cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilities.  All instruments are accounted for on a historical cost basis, which, due to the short maturity of these financial instruments, approximates fair value at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007.

 

Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share

 

Loss per share was computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period.  The weighted average number of shares was calculated by taking the number of shares outstanding and weighting them by the amount of time that they were outstanding.  Outstanding warrants to purchase 7,455,434 and 11,861,015 shares of common stock, options to purchase 4,175,490 and 3,777,500 shares of common stock and unvested stock awards totaling 195,000 and 270,000 at September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted loss per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, because to do so would have been antidilutive.  Therefore, basic loss per share is the same as diluted loss per share.

 

Mineral Exploration and Development Costs

 

All exploration expenditures are expensed as incurred.  Significant property acquisition payments for active exploration properties are capitalized.  If no economic ore body is discovered, previously capitalized costs, in excess of the property value, are expensed in the period the property is abandoned.  Expenditures to develop new mines, to define further mineralization in existing ore bodies, and to expand the capacity of operating mines, are capitalized and amortized on a units-of-production basis over proven and probable reserves.

 

Should a property be abandoned, its capitalized costs are charged to operations.  The Company charges to the consolidated statement of operations the allocable portion of capitalized costs attributable to properties sold.  Capitalized costs are allocated to properties sold based on the proportion of claims sold to the claims remaining within the project area.

 

7



 

Mining Properties, Land and Water Rights

 

Costs of acquiring and developing mining properties, land and water rights are capitalized as appropriate by project area.  Exploration and related costs and costs to maintain mining properties, land and water rights are expensed as incurred while the property is in the exploration and evaluation stage.  Development and related costs and costs to maintain mining properties, land and water rights are capitalized as incurred while the property is in the development stage.  When a property reaches the production stage, the related capitalized costs are amortized using the units-of-production basis over proven and probable reserves.  Mining properties, land and water rights are periodically assessed for impairment of value, and any subsequent losses are charged to operations at the time of impairment.  If a property is abandoned or sold, a gain or loss is recognized and included in the consolidated statement of operations.

 

Provision for Taxes

 

Income taxes are provided based upon the liability method of accounting pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (hereinafter “SFAS 109”).  Under this approach, deferred income taxes are recorded to reflect the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year-end.  A valuation allowance is recorded against the deferred tax asset if management does not believe the Company has met the “more likely than not” standard imposed by SFAS 109 to allow recognition of such an asset.

 

Reclamation and Remediation

 

Expenditures for ongoing compliance with environmental regulations that relate to current operations are expensed or capitalized as appropriate.  Expenditures resulting from the remediation of existing conditions caused by past operations that do not contribute to future revenue generations are expensed as incurred.  Liabilities are recognized when environmental assessments indicate that remediation efforts are probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated.

 

Estimates of such liabilities are based upon currently available facts, existing technology and presently enacted laws and regulations taking into consideration the likely effects of inflation and other societal and economic factors, and include estimates of associated legal costs.  These amounts also reflect prior experience in remediating contaminated sites, other companies’ clean-up experience and data released by The Environmental Protection Agency or other organizations.  Such estimates are by their nature imprecise and can be expected to be revised over time because of changes in government regulations, operations, technology and inflation.  Recoveries are evaluated separately from the liability and, when recovery is assured, the Company records and reports an asset separately from the associated liability.

 

Accounting Pronouncements—Recent

 

In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of SFAS 157 were adopted on January 1, 2008. In February 2008, the FASB staff issued Staff Position No. 157-2 “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157” which delayed the effective date of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities which will be effective for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2009.

 

SFAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value.  The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).  The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under SFAS 157 are described below:

 

Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical unrestricted assets or liabilities.

 

8



 

Level 2 – Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

Level 3 – Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to fair value measurement and unobservable (supported by little or no market activity).

 

The Company’s cash, restricted cash, and cash equivalents are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices.  The cash instruments that are valued based on quoted market prices in active markets are primarily money market securities.

 

In February 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value, with the objective of improving financial reporting by mitigating volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. The provisions of SFAS 159 were adopted January 1, 2008. The Company did not elect the Fair Value Option for any of its financial assets or liabilities and therefore the adoption of SFAS 159 had no impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

In December 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements- an amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS 160”), which establishes accounting and reporting standards pertaining to ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, the amount of net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a parent’s ownership interest, and the valuation of any retained noncontrolling equity investment when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. SFAS 160 also establishes disclosure requirements that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS 160 is effective for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2009. When adopted the minority interest will be reclassified as equity attributable to outside shareholders within total equity for all periods presented.

 

NOTE 4 — MINING PROPERTIES, LAND AND WATER RIGHTS

 

We currently have interests in two mining properties that are the primary focus of our operations.  The Mt. Hope Project is currently in the development stage and the Liberty Property is in the exploration and evaluation stage.

 

The Mt. Hope Project.  We are currently in the process of developing the Mt. Hope Project.  From November 2004 to January 2008, we owned the rights to 100% of the Mt. Hope Project.  In February 2008, we entered into the Joint Venture with POS-Minerals and we now own 80% of the Mt. Hope Project and POS-Minerals owns the remaining 20%.  While these ownership interests and/or the required contributions under the Joint Venture can change based on our failure to satisfy specified conditions, including the receipt of the necessary operating permits by December 31, 2009, failure to achieve production by December 31, 2011 for reasons other than force majeure, or non-payment of amounts due under the Joint Venture by either party, we expect the ownership interests in the Joint Venture to remain as they are now through the life of the project and the contributions to be received in the amounts that follow.

 

Pursuant to the terms of the Joint Venture, POS-Minerals agreed to make cash contributions to the Joint Venture in the aggregate amount of $170.0 million plus their 20% share of all development costs incurred from the Closing Date through the POS-Minerals Third Contribution Date in exchange for their 20% interest, of which $50.0 million was received in February 2008, $50.0 million was received in June 2008 (the “February 2008 and June 2008 Contributions”), and the Third Contribution Amount is to be received on the POS-Minerals Third Contribution Date.  These initial funds are available to fund the Mt. Hope Project development costs incurred after the Closing Date.  Additionally, during the third quarter of 2008, we paid to POS-Minerals $3.0 million as a final purchase price adjustment based on the terms of the Joint Venture related to the difference in the budgeted versus actual expenditures of the Mt. Hope Project prior to the Closing Date.

 

We are required, pursuant to the terms of the Joint Venture, to advance funds required for the development of the Mt. Hope Project in excess of the February 2008 and June 2008 Contributions until the POS-Minerals Third Contribution Date, at which point POS-Minerals is required to reimburse us for their 20% share of all development costs incurred from the Closing Date through the POS-Minerals Third Contribution Date.  All costs incurred after

 

9



 

the POS-Minerals Third Contribution Date will be allocated and funded pro rata based on each party’s ownership interest.

 

Our rights in the Mt. Hope Project are subject to the terms of the lease described further in Note 9.

 

The Liberty Property.   We are currently in the process of exploration and evaluation of the Liberty Property.

 

Summary.  The following is a summary of mining properties, land and water rights at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 (in thousands):

 

Mining properties, land and water rights:

 

At September
30, 2008

 

At
December 31,
2007

 

Mt. Hope Project:

 

 

 

 

 

Development costs

 

$

39,228

 

$

7,989

 

Mineral, land and water rights

 

10,253

 

9,792

 

Advance Royalties

 

3,650

 

1,100

 

Total Mt. Hope Project

 

53,131

 

18,881

 

Total Liberty Property

 

9,782

 

9,808

 

Other Properties

 

889

 

889

 

Total

 

$

63,802

 

$

29,578

 

 

NOTE 5 — COMMON STOCK WARRANTS

 

Nine Months ended September 30, 2008

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2008 we issued 125,930 shares of common stock upon the cashless exercise of warrants and 4,437,523 shares of common stock were issued upon the cash exercise of warrants in the amount of $20.3 million.

 

The following is a summary of common stock warrant activity from January 1, 2007 through the nine months ended September 30, 2008:

 

Description

 

Number of
Shares Under
Warrants

 

Exercise Price

 

Balance at January 1, 2007

 

12,217,675

 

$0.80 to $3.75

 

Issued in connection with private placements and other

 

3,676,471

 

$5.20

 

Issued as finders fee

 

1,000,000

 

$10.00

 

Exercised for cash

 

(4,261,689

)

$0.80 to $3.75

 

Exercised in cashless exchange

 

(542,000

)

$1.00 to $3.75

 

Expired

 

(10,000

)

$1.00

 

Balance at December 31, 2007

 

12,080,457

 

$0.80 to $10.00

 

Exercised for cash

 

(4,437,523

)

$0.80 to $5.20

 

Exercised in cashless exchange

 

(187,500

)

$3.75

 

Balance at September 30, 2008

 

7,455,434

 

$3.75 to $10.00

 

Weighted average exercise price

 

$

4.59

 

 

 

 

Of the warrants outstanding at September 30, 2008, 6,455,434 are exercisable at $3.75 per warrant and expire February 2011 and 1,000,000 are exercisable at $10.00 per share once General Moly has received financing necessary for the commencement of commercial production at the Mt. Hope project and will expire one year afterwards.

 

10



 

NOTE 6 — PREFERRED STOCK

 

Pursuant to our Certificate of Incorporation we are authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of $.001 per share par value preferred stock.  The authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock may be issued in designated series from time to time by one or more resolutions adopted by our Board.  The directors have the power to determine the preferences, limitations and relative rights of each series of preferred stock.  At December 31, 2007 and September 30, 2008, no shares of preferred stock were issued or outstanding.

 

NOTE 7 — EQUITY INCENTIVES

 

During 2006, our Board and stockholders adopted the Company 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”).  In October 2007, our stockholders approved an amendment to the 2006 Plan increasing the amount of shares that may be issued under the 2006 Plan from 3,500,000 to 5,100,000.  During 2004, our Board and stockholders adopted the Company 2003 Stock Option Plan (the “2003 Plan” and together with the 2006 Plan, the “Plans”).  The purpose of the Plans is to give us greater ability to attract, retain, and motivate our officers and key employees.  The Plans are intended to provide us with the ability to provide incentives more directly linked to the success of our business and increases in stockholder value.

 

Under the 2006 Plan, our Board is authorized to grant incentive stock options (“ISOs”) to employees (pursuant to Internal Revenue Code 422), non-statutory stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and stock appreciation rights.  The aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be issued pursuant to awards granted under the 2006 Plan will not exceed 5,100,000, plus the number of shares that are ungranted and those that are subject to reversion under the 2003 Plan.  As of September 30, 2008, the maximum number of shares available for issuance under the 2003 Plan was 360,000 shares and under the 2006 Plan was 799,792 shares.  Shares under the 2003 Plan that become eligible for awards under the 2006 Plan may not be granted again under the 2003 Plan.

 

The following is a summary of our equity incentive plans as of September 30, 2008:

 

Equity incentives

 

Number of
Securities to be
Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding Options

 

Weighted Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options

 

Number of
Securities
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation Plans

 

Equity incentives not approved by security holders

 

925,500

 

$

1.59

 

n/a

 

Equity incentive plans approved by security holders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2006 Plan

 

3,189,990

 

5.89

 

799,792

(1)

2003 Plan

 

60,000

 

2.10

 

360,000

 

Total

 

4,175,990

 

$

4.88

 

1,159,792

 

 


(1)              The aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be issued pursuant to awards granted under the 2006 Plan will not exceed 5,100,000, plus the number of shares that are ungranted and those that are subject to reversion under 2003 Plan.  Shares under the 2003 Plan that become eligible for awards under the 2006 Plan may not be granted again under the 2003 Plan.

 

Stock Options

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we granted 589,990 options under the 2006 Plan with an exercise price ranging from $6.71 to $11.45 with vesting at various dates through 2011.  These options were granted to officers and employees of the Company.  The fair value of each option is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes Option Price Calculation.  The following assumptions were made in estimating the fair value:  risk free interest rate of 1.7% to 5.2%; volatility of 85% to 104%; dividend rate of 0%; and expected life of from 3.5 to 5.5 years.  The total value of options awarded during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was calculated at

 

11



 

$3.4 million.  Expense was recorded of $1.3 million and $1.8 million was capitalized as part of development costs for the options that were earned during the nine months ended September 30, 2008.

 

The following is a summary of stock option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2008:

 

Description

 

Number of Shares
Under Options

 

Weighted Average
Exercise Price

 

Outstanding January 1, 2008

 

4,067,500

 

$

3.91

 

Granted

 

589,990

 

8.72

 

Forfeited

 

(30,000

)

4.05

 

Exercised

 

(452,000

)

1.18

 

Outstanding September 30, 2008

 

4,175,490

 

$

4.88

 

Exercisable at September 30, 2008

 

2,858,832

 

$

3.41

 

Weighted Average Fair Value Granted During 2008

 

$

5.79

 

 

 

 

Stock Awards under the 2006 Plan

 

During the year ended December 31, 2007, we issued 250,000 shares of common stock to an officer of the Company that were earned based on achieving certain performance based milestones.   Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2007, we reserved for issuance 535,000 shares of non-vested common stock for officers and employees of the Company of which 280,000 were issued upon achievement of certain performance based milestones in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 60,000 shares were forfeited and removed from the shares reserved upon an officer’s resignation on August 1, 2008.  The remaining 195,000 will vest and be issued based on the achievement of certain performance based milestones established for each person .

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007, we issued 133,550 and 160,000 shares, respectively, to directors that vest over one and two year periods in exchange for services as Board members.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, two of the directors retired, forfeiting a total of 63,334 shares of such stock.  Also during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007, we issued 10,000 shares and 5,000 shares, respectively, to retiring Board members in exchange for services rendered.

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2008 we issued 40,002 shares of unvested common stock to employees.  These shares vest based on employees’ service period over one, two and three year periods.

 

The total value of stock awards granted and expensed during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $1.3 million and $0.7 million, respectively.  The total value of stock awards granted during the year ended December 31, 2007 was $3.2 million of which $1.9 million was expensed and $1.3 million was capitalized as part of development costs.

 

NOTE 8 — INCOME TAXES

 

At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we had deferred tax assets principally arising from the net operating loss carry forwards for income tax purposes multiplied by an expected rate of 35%.  As our management cannot determine that it is more likely than not that we will realize the benefit of the deferred tax assets, a valuation allowance equal to the deferred tax asset has been established at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007.  The significant components of the deferred tax asset at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were as follows (in thousands):

 

12



 

Description

 

September 30,
2008

 

December 31,
2007

 

Operating loss carry forward

 

$

49,609

 

$

39,755

 

Unamortized exploration expense

 

7,985

 

8,268

 

Deductible stock based compensation

 

864

 

1,914

 

Net operating loss carry forward

 

$

58,458

 

$

49,937

 

Deferred tax asset

 

$

20,460

 

$

17,478

 

Deferred tax asset valuation allowance

 

$

(20,460

)

$

(17,478

)

Net deferred tax asset

 

$

 

$

 

 

At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we had net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $58.5 million and $49.9 million, respectively, which expire in the years 2022 through 2027.

 

NOTE 9—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

Mt. Hope Project

 

Eureka Moly currently has a 30-year renewable lease with Mount Hope Mines, Inc. (“MHMI”) for the Mt. Hope Project (as amended, the “Mt. Hope Lease”).  The Mt. Hope Lease may be terminated upon the expiration of its 30-year term, earlier at the election of Eureka Moly, or upon Eureka Moly’s material breach and failure to cure such breach.  If Eureka Moly terminates the lease, termination is effective 30 days after receipt by MHMI of written notice to terminate the Mt. Hope Lease and no further payments would be due to MHMI.  In order to maintain the lease, Eureka Moly must pay certain deferral fees and advance royalties as discussed below.

 

Pursuant to the terms of the Mt. Hope Lease, the underlying total royalty on production payable to MHMI, less certain deductions, is the greater of: (i) $0.25 per pound of molybdenum metal (or the equivalent of some other product) sold or deemed to be sold from the Mt. Hope Project;  (ii) 3.5% if the average gross level of products sold is equal to or lower than $12.00 per pound; (iii) 4.5% if the average gross level of products sold is higher than $12.00 per pound, but equal to or lower than $15 per pound, and (iv) 5% if the average gross level of products sold is higher than $15 per pound (the “Production Royalties”).  Additionally, Eureka Moly is obligated to pay Exxon Mineral Company a 1% net smelter royalty on all production.

 

The Mt. Hope Lease requires a royalty advance (the “Construction Royalty Advance”) of the greater of $2.5 million or 3% of the construction capital cost estimate upon the earlier of (i) Eureka Moly securing project financing in sufficient amounts to develop and put the Mt. Hope Project into operation at an annual production level of at least 10 million pounds or (ii) October 19, 2008.

 

Eureka Moly has the right to defer the Construction Royalty Advance for one or two years by payment of a deferral fee (the “Deferral Fee”) in the amount of $0.4 million on or before October 19, 2008 and October 19, 2009 in the event project financing for the project has not been secured by each of the dates.  By October 19, 2010, Eureka Moly must pay at a minimum $2.5 million of the Construction Royalty Advance with the remainder due upon securing project financing or 50% of the remainder on October 19, 2011 and the other 50% due on October 19, 2012.  On October 17, 2008 Eureka Moly paid the $0.4 million Deferral Fee of October 19, 2008 discussed above to MHMI thereby deferring the Construction Royalty Advance.

 

Once the Construction Royalty Advance has been paid in full, Eureka Moly is obligated to pay an advance royalty (the “Annual Advance Royalty”) each October 19 thereafter in the amount of $0.5 million per year.  The Construction Royalty Advance and the Annual Advance Royalty are collectively referred to as the “Advance Royalties”.  All Advance Royalties are credited against the Production Royalties once the mine has achieved commercial production.  The Deferral Fees are not recoverable against Production Royalties.

 

Eureka Moly is obligated to pay the Construction Royalty Advance each time capital is raised for the Mt. Hope Project.  Based on the current estimate of raising capital and developing and operating the mine, we believe Eureka Moly’s contractual obligations under the Mt. Hope Lease will be as shown in the following table (in thousands).  This estimate is based on our current estimates of the timing of securing project financing and construction capital

 

13



 

costs.  The amounts shown are the total amounts (in thousands) remaining at September 30, 2008 under the contracts to Eureka Moly.  Through September 30, 2008, we have advanced a total of $3.3 million.

 

 

Year

 

Deferral Fees

 

Advance Royalties

 

Total

 

2008 (remainder)

 

$

350

 

$

 

$

350

 

2009

 

 

21,650

 

21,650

 

2010

 

 

500

 

500

 

2011 (1)

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

350

 

$

22,150

 

$

22,500

 

 


(1)           Based on our current estimates of production and molybdenum prices, after the first full year of production, Eureka Moly estimates that the Production Royalties will be in excess of the Annual Advance Royalties for the life of the project and, further, the Construction Royalty Advance will be fully recovered (credited against MHMI Production Royalties) by the end of 2012.

 

Deposits on property, plant and equipment

 

As a continuing part of the development of the Mt. Hope Project, Eureka Moly has begun to place orders for mining and milling equipment that must be built to specification and requires a long lead time for engineering and manufacturing.  Contractual commitments for long lead items require progress payments during the engineering and construction of the equipment and have cancellation penalties in the event Eureka Moly cancels the contract.

 

In the year ended December 31, 2007, we entered into contracts to purchase a primary crusher, a semi-autogenous mill, two ball mills and various motors for the mills.  Additionally, during the nine months ended September 30, 2008, Eureka Moly entered into contracts to purchase, among other items, two electric shovels, two multi-hearth molybdenum roasters, 16 flotation cells, three blast hole drills and 24 haul trucks.  At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, $23.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively, had been paid under the contracts.  At September 30, 2008 Eureka Moly has committed to the following additional amounts under the contracts by year (in thousands).

 

Year

 

Total

 

2008 (remainder)

 

$

19,594

 

2009

 

127,775

 

2010

 

57,585

 

2011

 

942

 

Total

 

$

205,896

 

 

Deposit into an escrow account for electricity transmission service

 

During the three months ended September 30, 2008 Eureka Moly deposited into an escrow account $12.6 million as security for an electricity transmission contract that will provide electricity transmission to the Mt. Hope Project.

 

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

References made in this Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q to “we,” “our,” “us,” or the “Company,” refer to General Moly, Inc.

 

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations constitutes management’s review of the factors that affected our financial and operating performance for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.  This discussion should be read in conjunction with the

 

14



 

financial statements and notes thereto contained elsewhere in this report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, for the year ended December 31, 2007, which was filed on March 21, 2008.

 

Overview

 

We are a development stage company and are currently proceeding with the development of the Mt. Hope Project.  We are also conducting exploration and evaluation activities on our Liberty Property.

 

On October 4, 2007, our Board of Directors approved the development of the Mt. Hope Project as contemplated in our Bankable Feasibility Study (the “Bankable Feasibility Study”).  The Company has completed basic engineering of the Mt. Hope Project and has updated its Bankable Feasibility Study based upon having completed 25% of the engineering.

 

The development of the Mt. Hope Project has an estimated total capital requirement ranging from approximately $1.1 billion to $1.2 billion comprised of initial development costs of approximately $1,040.0 million (in 2008 dollars); $65.0 million in cash bonding requirements; $26.0 million in Advance Royalty Payments; $16.0 million in pre-payments; and amounts necessary for working capital.  Depending on the ultimate capital structure to finance the project, additional costs may be necessary for financing costs.  Through September 30, 2008 Eureka Moly has placed approximately $228.5 million in equipment orders and has pre-paid $12.6 million into an escrow arrangement for electricity transmission services.  The original estimated total capital requirement was approximately $1.0 billion, comprised of initial development costs in excess of $850.0 million (in 2007 dollars); $53.0 million in cash bonding requirements; $22.0 million in Advance Royalty Payments; and amounts necessary for working capital.  The total increase in the estimated initial development costs compared with the August 2007 Bankable Feasibility Study amount was primarily a result of increases to construction labor rates, commodity prices (primarily fuel costs), indirect construction costs, increase in quantity of construction materials and Company salary and wages.

 

Effective as of January 1, 2008, we contributed all of our interest in the assets related to the Mt. Hope Project, including the Mt. Hope Lease, to Eureka Moly and in February 2008 (the “Closing Date”) entered into the Mt. Hope Project joint venture with POS-Minerals (the “Joint Venture”).  Under the terms of the Joint Venture, POS-Minerals owns a 20% interest in Eureka Moly, and General Moly, through a subsidiary, owns an 80% interest. While these ownership interests and/or the required contributions under the Joint Venture can change based on our failure to satisfy certain specified conditions, including the receipt of the necessary operating permits by December 31, 2009, failure to achieve production by December 31, 2011 for reasons other than force majeure, or non-payment of amounts due under the Joint Venture by either party, we expect the interests to remain as they are now through the life of the project and the contributions to be received in the amounts that follow.

 

Pursuant to the terms of the Joint Venture, POS-Minerals agreed to make cash contributions to the Joint Venture in the aggregate amount of $170.0 million plus their 20% share of all development costs incurred from the Closing Date through the POS-Minerals Third Contribution Date in exchange for their 20% interest, of which $50.0 million was received in February 2008, $50.0 million was received in June 2008 (the “February 2008 and the June 2008 Contributions”), and the remaining $70.0 million will be received once the Mt. Hope Project receives the necessary permits to develop and operate the project (the “POS-Minerals Third Contribution Date”).  These initial funds are available to fund the Mt. Hope Project development costs incurred subsequent to the Closing Date. Additionally, in the third quarter of 2008, we paid to POS-Minerals $3.0 million as a final purchase price adjustment based on the terms of the Joint Venture related to the difference in the budgeted versus actual expenditures of the Mt. Hope Project prior to the Closing Date.

 

We are required, pursuant to the terms of the Joint Venture, to advance funds required for the development of the Mt. Hope Project that exceed the February 2008 and June 2008 Contributions until the POS-Minerals Third Contribution Date at which point POS-Minerals is required to reimburse us for their 20% share of all development costs incurred from the Closing Date through the POS-Minerals Third Contribution Date.  All costs incurred after the POS-Minerals Third Contribution Date will be allocated and funded pro rata based on each party’s ownership interest.

 

15



 

Additional capital will be required through the commencement of Mt. Hope processing, which is estimated to begin in late 2010.  Our ability to develop the project on time and on budget is dependent on, among other things, the permitting process and our ability to raise the necessary capital to fund the Mt. Hope Project both in sufficient amount and in a timely manner.  Additionally, if the currently estimated costs of the Mt. Hope Project are exceeded we will need to raise additional capital to fund such overruns.

 

We do not currently have the capital necessary to complete the Mt. Hope Project and, accordingly, plan to raise the capital on an ongoing basis when needed.  We currently estimate needing between $600-$700 million to fully finance the Mt. Hope project.  The Company is currently, and will on an ongoing basis be, pursuing the most efficient sources of funding for the project including, but not limited to, the equity markets, the bank project finance markets and the high yield capital debt markets.  The Company is also evaluating additional support from current strategic partners, the possibility of a sale of another minority interest in the Mt. Hope project to other strategic partners, debt from private investment groups as well as the continued monitoring of the capital markets as potential sources of interim project financing needs.  Recent disruptions in national and international credit markets have led to very illiquid and volatile conditions.  There is a scarcity of credit and lenders are imposing tighter lending standards and higher interest rates on loans.  Our ability to obtain the necessary funding for the Mt. Hope Project as well as the terms for such funding may be adversely affected by these disruptions in the credit markets.  The existing cash on hand at September 30, 2008 should be sufficient to fund planned operations for the Mt. Hope Project, as well as our other planned operations through the first quarter of 2009.  If we are unable to raise capital when needed, it will be necessary to develop alternative plans that could delay the development and completion of the Mt. Hope Project.  There is no assurance that we will be able to obtain the necessary financing for the Mt. Hope Project on customary or favorable terms, or at all.

 

We also require additional capital to continue the exploration and evaluation of the Liberty Property, as well as continue payment of ongoing general and administrative costs associated with supporting our planned operations.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

We have limited capital resources and thus have had to rely upon the sale of equity securities and the formation of a joint venture for the cash required for exploration and development purposes, for mineral property acquisitions and to fund our general and administrative costs.  As discussed above in the overview section, we will require, and continue to require additional funds on an ongoing basis until Eureka Moly has completed the development of the Mt. Hope Project and profitable operations are achieved.  Since we do not expect to generate any revenues until the Mt. Hope Project begins production, we will continue to rely on the sale of our equity and debt securities, bank financing and joint venture arrangements to raise capital.  There is no assurance that we will be able to obtain the necessary financing in the amount required at any particular time or for any period or, if available, that it can be obtained on terms acceptable to us.

 

 In September 2008 we appointed Barclays Capital and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC as co-lead project finance arrangers to structure and arrange the financing package for the Mt. Hope Project.

 

Our cash balance at September 30, 2008 was $79.5 million compared to $78.4 million at December 31, 2007.  Additionally we have $41.6 million of restricted cash that represents the unspent amount of the February 2008 and June 2008 Contributions from POS-Minerals that is available for the continuing development of the Mt. Hope Project.

 

Total assets as at September 30, 2008 were $226.1 million compared to $110.3 million as of December 31, 2007.  These increases were due primarily to the receipt of a total of $100.0 million from POS-Minerals in the February and June 2008 Contributions, and net proceeds from exercises of warrants and options totaling $20.5 million offset by expenditures for continuing exploration and evaluation of our Liberty Property, plus expenditures for our general and administrative costs.

 

As discussed above, in addition to the $100.0 million we received from POS-Minerals in the February 2008 and June 2008 Contributions, we are scheduled to receive an additional $70.0 million at the time Eureka Moly receives the necessary permits to develop and operate the Mt. Hope Project (including the record of decision for the Mt. Hope Project), which is expected in the third quarter of 2009.  Additionally, we expect POS-Minerals to fund approximately $60.0 million on the POS-Minerals Third Contribution Date, which represents POS-Minerals’ share of the anticipated project costs from January 1, 2008 through the POS-Minerals Third Contribution Date.

 

16



 

We believe the cash on hand at September 30, 2008 (including the cash restricted for use in the Joint Venture) will be sufficient to fund our joint venture development, exploration, evaluation and operating activities, as well as our other planned operations, through the first quarter of 2009.

 

Results of Operations

 

For the three months ended September 30, 2008 we had a net loss of $2.8 million compared with a net loss of $12.1 million in the same period for 2007.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 we had a net loss of $11.8 million compared with a net loss of $30.6 million in the same period for 2007.

 

For the three months ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007, exploration and evaluation expenses were $1.1 million and $6.0 million, respectively.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007, exploration and evaluation expenses were $5.3 million and $16.2 million, respectively.  During the entire nine months ended September 30, 2007 both our Mt. Hope Project and our Liberty Property were in the exploration and evaluation stage.  In October 2007 the Mt. Hope Project advanced to the development stage.  For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 we incurred exploration and evaluation costs on the Liberty Property as we progressed to the completion of a pre-feasibility study on the Liberty Property that was completed in April 2008.

 

For the three months ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007, general and administrative expenses were $2.2 million and $6.4 million, respectively.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007, general and administrative expenses were $8.1 million and $15.3 million, respectively.  During the three months ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007 we incurred $0.4 million and $1.0 million, respectively and during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007 we incurred $2.0 million and $5.5 million, respectively, in non-cash equity compensation for management and directors included in the general and administrative expenses above.  The amounts in 2007 were significantly higher than in 2008 as a greater amount of equity compensation was incurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as we added new management personnel and directors as part of a reorganization and expansion of the executive team compared with the same period in 2008.  The cash portion of our general and administrative expense was approximately the same in both periods.

 

Interest income was $0.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared with $0.3 million for the same period in 2007 and was $1.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared with $0.9 million for the same period in 2007 as a result of higher cash balances in 2008 compared with the corresponding periods in 2007.

 

Changes in Accounting Policies

 

We did not change our accounting policies during the nine months ended September 30, 2008.

 

ITEM 3.                                                      QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

Commodity Price Risk

 

We are a development stage company in the business of the exploration, development and mining of properties primarily containing molybdenum.  As a result, upon commencement of production, which is estimated to begin at the Mt. Hope Project in late 2010, our financial performance could be materially affected by fluctuations in the market price of molybdenum and other metals we may mine.  The market prices of metals can fluctuate widely due to a number of factors.  These factors include fluctuations with respect to the rate of inflation, the exchange rates of the US dollar and other currencies, interest rates, global or regional political and economic conditions, banking environment, global and regional demand, production costs, and investor sentiment.

 

In order to better manage commodity price risk and to seek to reduce the negative impact of fluctuations in prices, we will seek to enter into long term supply contracts.  On December 28, 2007, we entered into a molybdenum supply agreement with ArcelorMittal that provides for ArcelorMittal to purchase 6.5 million pounds of molybdenum per year, plus or minus 10%, once the Mt. Hope Project commences commercial operations at

 

17



 

minimum specified levels. The supply agreement provides for a floor price along with a discount for spot prices above the floor price and expires five years after the commencement of commercial production at the Mt. Hope Project.  Both the floor and threshold levels at which the percentage discounts change are indexed to a producer price index.

 

Additionally, on May 14, 2008, we entered into a molybdenum supply agreement with SeAH Besteel Corporation (“SeAH Besteel”), Korea’s largest manufacturer of specialty steels, that provides for SeAH Besteel to purchase 4.0 million pounds of molybdenum per year, plus or minus 10%, once the Mt. Hope Project commences commercial operations at minimum specified levels. Like the ArcelorMittal supply agreement, the supply agreement with SeAH Besteel provides for a floor price along with staged discounts for spot prices above the floor price and expires five years from the date of first supply under the agreement.  Both the floor and threshold levels at which the percentage discounts change are indexed to a producer price index.

 

On August 8, 2008, the Company entered into a molybdenum supply agreement (the “Sojitz Agreement”) with Sojitz Corporation.  The Sojitz Agreement provides for the supply of five million pounds per year of molybdenum for five years, beginning once the Mt. Hope Project reaches certain minimum commercial production levels.  One million annual pounds sold under the Sojitz Agreement will be subject to a per-pound molybdenum floor price and is offset by a flat discount to spot moly prices above the floor.  The remaining four million annual pounds sold under the Sojitz Agreement will be sold with reference to spot moly prices without regard to a floor price.

 

While we have not used derivative financial instruments in the past, we may elect to enter into derivative financial instruments to manage commodity price risk.  We have not entered into any market risk sensitive instruments for trading or speculative purposes and do not expect to enter into derivative or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

 

Interest Rate Risk

 

As of September 30, 2008, we had a balance of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash of $133.6 million.  If and to the extent that these funds were invested in interest bearing instruments during the entire nine month period ended September 30, 2008, a hypothetical 1% decrease in the rate of interest earned on these funds would affect our income for the nine month period ended September 30, 2008 by approximately $1.0 million.

 

ITEM 4.                                                      CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.  Based on the foregoing, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms and such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2008 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

18



 

PART II

 

OTHER INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1.                                                      LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

We are involved from time to time in litigation incidental to our business. We believe that the outcome of current litigation is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

 

ITEM 1A.                                             RISK FACTORS.

 

Our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, including the discussion under the heading “Risk Factors” therein, and this report describe risks that may materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.  The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB and this report are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operations.

 

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

 

Certain statements in this report may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause actual results, performance or achievements of our Company, the Mt. Hope Project, Liberty Property and our other projects, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.  We use the words “may,” “will,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “future,” “plan,” “estimate,” “potential” and other similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements.  These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward looking statements. Such risks, uncertainties and assumptions are described in the “Risk Factors” section included in our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 and this report, and include, among other things:

 

·                   our dependence on the success of the Mt. Hope Project;

·                   the ability to obtain all required permits and approvals for the Mt. Hope Project and the Liberty Property;

·                   issues related to the management of the Mt. Hope Project pursuant to the Mt. Hope Joint Venture;

·                   risks related to the failure of POS-Minerals to make contributions pursuant to the Mt. Hope Joint Venture;

·                   fluctuations in the market price of, and demand for, molybdenum and other metals;

·                   the estimation and realization of mineral reserves, if any;

·                   the timing of exploration, development and production activities and estimated future production, if any;

·                   estimates related to costs of production, capital, operating and exploration expenditures;

·                   requirements for additional capital and the possible sources of such capital;

·                   government regulation of mining operations, environmental conditions and risks, reclamation and rehabilitation expenses;

·                   title disputes or claims; and

·                   limitations of insurance coverage.

 

You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report.  These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including those set forth above.  Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, our actual results could differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements, and any events anticipated in the forward-looking statements may not actually occur.  Except as required by law, we undertake no duty to update any forward-looking statements after the date of this report to conform those statements to actual results or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.  We qualify all forward-looking statements contained in this report by the foregoing cautionary statements.

 

19



 

ITEM 2.                                                      UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

 

None.

 

ITEM 3.                                                      DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

 

None.

 

ITEM 4.                                                      SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

 

None.

 

ITEM 5.                                                      OTHER INFORMATION

 

None.

 

ITEM 6.                                                      EXHIBITS

 

Exhibit 
Number

 

Description of Exhibit

10.26*

 

Molybdenum Supply Agreement between the Company and Sojitz Corporation, dated as of August 8, 2008

31.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 


* Confidential treatment has been requested for certain portions of this exhibit, and such confidential portions have been separately filed with the Securities Exchange Commission.

 

20



 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

Dated: November 3, 2008

 

 

GENERAL MOLY, INC.

 

 

 

By:

/s/ David A. Chaput

 

 

David A. Chaput

 

 

Chief Financial Officer and

 

 

Duly Authorized Officer

 

21


EXHIBIT 10.26

 

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT HAS BEEN REQUESTED FOR PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT. THE COPY FILED HEREWITH OMITS THE INFORMATION SUBJECT TO THE CONFIDENTIALITY REQUEST.  OMISSIONS ARE DESIGNATED AS [****]. A COMPLETE VERSION OF THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.

 

MOLYBDENUM SUPPLY AGREEMENT

 

THIS MOLYBDENUM SUPPLY AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of the 8 th day of August, 2008 by and between General Moly, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“ General Moly ”), and Sojitz Corporation, a Japanese corporation (“ Buyer ”). Each of General Moly and Buyer are individually referred to herein as a “Party” and together as the “ Parties .”

 

RECITALS

 

A.             Eureka Moly, LLC (“ Eureka Moly ”) leases and intends to operate a mine located in Eureka County, Nevada (the “ Mount Hope Mine ”) from which it intends to produce Technical Grade Molybdenum Oxide (“ TMO ”), in the form of powder and carbon-free briquettes, that meets or exceeds the standards on Exhibit A (the “ Products ”);

 

B.             As of the date hereof, (i) General Moly, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Nevada Moly, LLC, owns an 80% equity interest in Eureka Moly and (ii) POS-Minerals Corporation, a Delaware corporation and affiliate of POSCO Canada Ltd., owns a 20% equity interest in Eureka Moly; and

 

C.             General Moly wants to sell to Buyer, and Buyer wants to purchase from General Moly, Products available from General Moly’s share of production at the Mount Hope Mine (offer is for output of Mount Hope Mine production only) upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties, intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:

 

AGREEMENT

 

1.              Definitions and Construction .

 

1.1            Defined Terms . In addition to the capitalized terms defined elsewhere in this Agreement, for purposes of this Agreement:

 

Adjusted Market Price ” means (a) the applicable Market Price times (b) [****].

 

Affiliate ” of any Person means any other Person directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, controlling, controlled by or under common control with such Person. A Person will be deemed to control another Person if the controlling Person is the beneficial owner of greater than 50% of any class or voting securities (or other voting or equity interests) of the

 



 

controlled person or possesses, directly or indirectly, the power to direct or cause the direction of the management or policies of the controlled Person, whether through ownership of capital stock, by contract or credit arrangement, as trustee or executor, or otherwise.

 

Annual Amount ” means, for any calendar year during the Term, the sum of (i) the Base Amount and (ii) the Additional Amount for such calendar year.

 

Available Production ” means the amount of Products available from General Moly’s share of production at the Mount Hope Mine after satisfaction of the Existing Obligations.

 

Business Day ” means a day other them a Saturday or Sunday or a day on which banks are required or authorized to be closed in the State of New York or in Japan.

 

CIF ” has the meaning given to it in the International Chamber of Commerce’s official rules for the interpretation of trade terms known as Incoterms 2000.

 

Existing Obligations ” means General Moly’s contractual obligations relating to the supply of Products from General Moly’s share of production at the Mount Hope Mine that are in existence as of the date of this Agreement, or which are currently under negotiation, as set forth in Exhibit B .

 

Floor Price ” per pound of molybdenum contained in the Products means:

 

(a)            for 2008, $[****], and

 

(b)            for 2009 and thereafter:

 

$[****] x (1 + [****] Percentage Change), but in no event less than $[****].

 

For clarification, (i) the Floor Price will only be adjusted [****], which will occur [****] of the information necessary to calculate the applicable [****] Percentage Change becoming [****] available [****], (ii) to the extent the information necessary to calculate such adjustment is not available [****], the adjustment will be calculated when such information becomes available and applied retroactively [****], and (iii) the Floor Price will be calculated as set forth above regardless of the Market Price or any other adjustments to the Product Price (as defined in Section 3 ). All adjustments will be retroactive to the Product sales [****]. Appropriate retroactive adjustments will be reflected in the following month’s invoice cycle and will be subject to the same payment terms as regular sales.

 

Losses ” means any claims, losses, liabilities, damages, demands, fines, penalties, administrative and judicial proceedings and orders, judgments, remedial action, enforcement actions of any kind, and all reasonable and documented costs and expenses incurred in connection therewith (including reasonable attorneys’ fees).

 

Market Price ” means the average of the Platt’s Metals Week published prices for TMO Dealer Oxide during (a) the month that was agreed for shipment, regardless of the month of actual shipment, or (b) the month prior to the month that was agreed for shipment, regardless of the month of actual shipment, as Buyer may determine annually pursuant to Section 3.2 . In the

 

2



 

event that the basis for the Market Price ceases to exist or ceases to be published, the Parties shall meet promptly with a view to agreeing on a new pricing basis and the date for bringing such basis into effect.

 

Person ” means an individual, limited or general partnership, corporation, trust, limited liability company, unincorporated organization, association, joint venture or a government or agency or political subdivision or instrumentality thereof.

 

“[****] Percentage Change ” means [****].

 

Sales Territory ” means, unless otherwise agreed by the Parties in writing, (a) Japan, for which Buyer has an exclusive right to market, sell and distribute the Products (the “ Exclusive Sales Territory ”), and (b) South Korea, for which Buyer has a non-exclusive right to market, sell and distribute the Products during the three- (3-) year period following the Commencement Date (e.g., if the Commencement Date is January 1, 2011, such non-exclusive right runs through December 31, 2013). Thereafter, Buyer’s non-exclusive right In South Korea shall continue during the Term, unless revoked or otherwise limited by General Moly upon twelve (12) months written notice to Buyer, in the event that General Moly desires to enter into an exclusive sales agreement with a third party with respect to South Korea.

 

Term ” means the term of this Agreement as set forth in Section 5 hereof.

 

Three-Month LIBOR ” means the rate for deposits in U.S. Dollars for a period of three months that appears on Reuters page LIBOR01 (or such other replacement page) as of 11:00 a.m. London time on the date an applicable invoice is due hereunder. If Three-Month LIBOR is not available from such source, then Three-Month LIBOR will be based on quotations from four major reference banks in the London interbank market for deposits in U.S. dollars for a period of three months.

 

1.2            Construction .

 

1.2.1         The words “include,” “includes,” and “including” will be deemed to be followed by “without limitation.”

 

1.2.2         Any term importing the singular includes the plural and vice versa.

 

1.2.3         Any reference to a gender includes the other genders.

 

1.2.4         Any reference to “pounds” in this Agreement refers to pounds of molybdenum contained in the Products.

 

1.2.5         The headings in this Agreement have been inserted for convenience only and will not be taken into account in its interpretation.

 

2.              Commencement Date and Supply Purchase Commitments

 

2.1            No Obligation Until Commencement Date . No obligation to supply or purchase Products under this Agreement will exist prior to the first January 1 st (the “ Commencement

 

3



 

Date ”) following two consecutive months during which output at the Mount Hope Mine equals or exceeds 1.7 million pounds of molybdenum contained in the TMO produced during each such mouth (the “ Production Date ”). General Moly will notify Buyer of the Production Date not less than ten (10) calendar days following the occurrence of the Production Date. If the Commencement Date has not been reached by January 1, 2013, then Buyer may at its sole option terminate this Agreement.

 

2.2            Supply of Products After Commencement Date . Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement, General Moly agrees to supply to Buyer, and Buyer agrees to purchase from General Moly, subject to the Available Production, the amount of Products as follows:

 

2.2.1         For each calendar year following the Commencement Date, five million (5,000,000) pounds of Products (the “ Base Amount ”).

 

2.2.2         For each calendar year following the Commencement Date, General Moly and Buyer shall enter into discussions to determine if any additional amount of Products snail be supplied under this Agreement (any such quantity of Products, an “ Additional Amount ”), up to a maximum of [****] ([****]) additional pounds in any calendar year (which amount shall be prorated for any portion of a calendar year), and the prices for any such Additional Amount; provided that such determination must be made (a) by the Commencement Date, in the case of the calendar year in which the Commencement Date occurs and the subsequent calendar year if the Commencement Date occurs after September 30, and (b) by September 30 of the prior year, for each calendar year beginning with the calendar year after the Commencement Date. For clarification, if General Moly and Buyer do not agree (each in its own discretion) on the quantity or pricing with respect to any such Additional Amount in accordance with the foregoing deadlines, General Moly shall have no obligation under this Agreement to supply any Additional Amount for the applicable calendar year.

 

2.3            Monthly Quantities . The quantity of Product to be delivered pursuant to Section 2.2 shall be taken in approximately equal monthly quantities over the course of the particular calendar year. The Parties will reasonably cooperate with each other in connection with forecasting, ordering and delivery schedules and procedures. If after the Commencement Date General Moly fails to deliver the quantity of Products required to be delivered pursuant to this Agreement for a period of two consecutive months, Buyer shall have the right to require that General Moly supply such shortfall in subsequent months, subject to Available Production, at such Product Price as would have applied if the Products had been shipped pursuant to the originally agreed delivery schedule. This is a best effort supply agreement based on the Available Production of Mount Hope Mine with no recourse to short supply except to allow it to be made up in future months, at Buyer’s request, when supply is available.

 

2.4            Take-and-Pay . Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, Buyer agrees that if Buyer fails to take delivery of Products conforming to the Specifications made available by General Moly in the amounts and on the terms set forth in this Agreement up to the Annual Amount in each calendar year during the Term, Buyer will still be obligated to pay General Moly with respect to such Products as though Buyer had taken delivery pursuant to the terms of this

 

4



 

Agreement. Any such shortfall in a calendar quarter that exceeds ten percent (10%) of the pro-rated Annual Amount will be invoiced as if supplied in the first month of the following quarter, along with supporting documentation reasonably acceptable to Buyer, with pricing to be the average of the quarter in which the shortfall occurred, and Buyer shall have the right to determine the disposition of such Products.

 

2.5            Composition of Products . All Products contemplated under this Agreement shall conform to the specification listed in Section 2.6 and unless otherwise agreed by the Parties shall be supplied as TMO in powder form in 250kg drums on pallet. To the extent available, General Moly will make available to Buyer the Products in other forms and packaging at mutually agreed discounts or premiums depending on the Product form selected.

 

2.6            Specifications . The specifications and technical requirements of the Products to be delivered hereunder are set forth in Exhibit A (the “ Specifications ”). Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, Buyer will not be required hereunder to purchase any Products which do not comply with the Specifications.

 

2.7            Sales Territory . Without the prior written consent of General Moly (which consent shall be at the sole discretion of General Moly), during the Term, Buyer agrees that it will not (a) sell, transfer or otherwise distribute any Products outside of the Sales Territory, (b) enter into any agreement or arrangement with any other party or amend any existing agreement or arrangement regarding the sale, transfer or other distribution of any Products outside of the Sales Territory, or (c) take any other action to intentionally circumvent the restrictions set forth in (a) and (b) above. For the avoidance of doubt, Buyer may distribute TMO or any other product not purchased by Buyer from General Moly in any territory.

 

2.9            Certain Sales by General Moly . Without the prior written consent of Buyer (which shall be at the sole discretion of Buyer), during the Term, General Moly agrees that it will not (a) sell, transfer or otherwise distribute any Products within the Exclusive Sales Territory, or enter into an agreement or arrangement with another party for its sale, transfer or distribution of Products within the Exclusive Sales Territory except that covered under Section 6.2 , (b) amend any Existing Obligation pursuant to which General Moly is obligated to supply Products from the Mount Hope Mine to any destination within the Exclusive Sales Territory, or (c) take any other action to intentionally circumvent the restriction set forth in (a) above.

 

3.              Pricing and Payment Terms . The price payable by Buyer to General Moly for Products supplied by General Moly to Buyer pursuant to this Agreement (the “ Product Price ”) will be equal to the Base Product Price plus any mutually agreed premiums or minus any mutually agreed discounts for Products supplied pursuant to the terms of this Agreement that is other than TMO in powder form in 250kg drums on pallet.

 

3.1            Base Product Price . The base price payable by Buyer to General Moly for Products supplied by General Moly to Buyer pursuant to this Agreement (the “ Base Product Price ”) will be as follows:

 

3.1.1         For the first [****] pounds of Base Amount delivered in any calendar month, the Base Product Price will be equal to:

 

5



 

(a)            if the Adjusted Market Price is less than or equal to the Floor Price, an amount equal to the Floor Price; and

 

(b)            if the Adjusted Market Price exceeds the Floor Price, an amount equal to the Adjusted Market Price.

 

3.1.2         For any portion of the Base Amount in excess of [****] pounds delivered in any calendar month, the Base Product Price will be equal to:

 

Market Price

 

x       [****]

 

3.1.3         For any Additional Amount, the Parties shall discuss and agree on the Base Product Price.

 

3.2            Determination of Market Price . No later than (a) the Commencement Date, for the calendar year in which the Commencement Date occurs, and (b) November 30 of the prior calendar year for any subsequent calendar year during the Term, Buyer will give written notice to General Moly of the method of determining Market Price (as set forth in the definition of Market Price in Section 1 ). No later than November 30 of the prior calendar year, for any subsequent calendar year during the Term, Buyer will give written notice to General Moly of the general Product forms, types and packaging requested to be supplied hereunder in the following calendar year, with specific quantities, forms, types and packaging to be notified pursuant to Section 4.4 hereof. The Parties agree to cooperate in good faith to reach agreement to determine premiums and/or discounts for Product supplied pursuant to the terms of this Agreement that is other than TMO in 250kg drums on pallet. To the extent the Parties cannot reach such agreement by December 31 of the year in which such notice was delivered, the Products for the following calendar year shall be supplied as TMO in 250kg drums on pallet. In the event the price is not known at the time of shipment, a provisional invoice will be issued using the “Market Price for the month prior to the month of shipment” as the pricing basis, and a final invoice shall be provided within ten (10) days after determination of such final price. If the final invoice indicates that further payment by Buyer is required, Buyer shall pay such amount by wire transfer to General Moly within ten (10) days of receiving such final invoice. If the final invoice indicates that Buyer is due a refund, General Moly shall apply a corresponding credit to Buyer’s account.

 

4.              Deliveries and Invoices .

 

4.1            Delivery Point . All Products will be delivered CIF major Japanese port of discharge (including Yokohama, Nagoya, Osaka, Kobe and Moji), unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, in which case Buyer will be charged or credited, as appropriate, the surcharge or savings at cost for such point of delivery. The Product Price is CIF major Japanese port, or as otherwise agreed by the Parties.

 

4.2            Invoices . Upon each shipment of Products, General Moly will invoice Buyer for the corresponding Product Price. General Moly will, at its expense, supply a certificate confirming that each shipment of Products complies with the Specifications, evidence in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Buyer of the quantity of Products loaded on to the ship, and an ocean bill of lading. The invoice date will be the ocean bill of lading date and the amount

 

6



 

shown on such invoice will be due and payable by wire transfer to an account identified by General Moly within thirty (30) days of the date of the ocean bill of lading, subject to any Assay Adjustment as set forth in Section 4.3 . If Buyer fails to pay any undisputed invoice amount pursuant to this Agreement on or before the applicable due date, interest on the unpaid amount at a rate per annum equal to Three-Month LIBOR plus one point five percent (1.5%) each year will accrue from the applicable due date until the full invoice amount is paid.

 

4.3            Assay Adjustments .

 

4.3.1         Buyer has the right to appoint a neutral sampler (the “ Sampler ”), approved by General Moly (which approval will not be unreasonably withheld or delayed), to take samples of the Products at the applicable delivery point. Without prejudice to any other right of Buyer hereunder, in the event that Buyer determines that General Moly has delivered Product with an incorrect percentage of Mo content, which should result in an adjustment to the Product Price (an “ Assay Adjustment ”), Buyer will notify General Moly in writing of such determination (along with its results of analysis of such Product) within sixty (60) days of receipt of such shipment. The Parties will appoint a mutually agreeable third party to assist in the resolution of such matter (the “ Referee ”) within seventy-five (75) days of delivery of such notice. If the Parties fail to so appoint the Referee within such seventy-five (75) day period, SGS Group (or such other mutually agreeable third party, in the event that SGS Group or its successor ceases to exist) will act as the Referee at any Party’s request. The Referee will analyze the sample of such Product taken by the Sampler, whose determination will be final and binding upon the Parties.

 

4.3.2         The costs and expenses related to the procedures set forth in this Section 4.3 (including the costs of the Sampler and Referee) will be borne by the Party whose results are furthest from the results of the Referee. In the event that the results of the Referee are exactly between those of General Moly and the Buyer, each of General Moly and the Buyer will bear fifty percent (50%) of any such costs and expenses, For the purpose of the foregoing, the “results” of General Moly will refer to the assay results set forth on the related invoice.

 

4.3.3         In the event that the final determination results in an obligation on a Party to pay additional amounts or to reimburse any sum, such payment or reimbursement will be settled by credit or debit set forth on the next invoice delivered by General Moly to Buyer.

 

4.4            Monthly Notification . Without limiting the provisions of Section 2.3 , Buyer will provide General Moly with written notice of required quantities and shipping dates no later than thirty (30) days prior to the intended month of shipment, as well as the delivery points, forms, types and packaging of Products to be supplied hereunder during such month.

 

7



 

5.              Term; Termination .

 

5.1            Term . The initial term of this Agreement will commence on the date hereof and expire five (5) years from the Commencement Date unless sooner terminated in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.

 

5.2            Termination . This Agreement may be terminated by:

 

(a)            either Party at any Time in the event of a material breach of this Agreement by the other Party, provided a written termination notice identifying the material breach has been sent to the breaching Party and the breach has not been cured within sixty (60) days from the date of said notice;

 

(b)            either Party at any time, by written notice, in the event:

 

(i)             of insolvency of the other Party;

 

(ii)            of the filing of a voluntary petition in bankruptcy of the other Party;

 

(iii)           of the making of an assignment for the benefit of creditors by the other Party, excluding assignments of accounts receivable;

 

(iv)           of the inability of the other Party to pay its debts as they come due;

 

(v)            the other Party has a receiver or other custodian of any kind appointed to administer any substantial amount of the other Party’s property;

 

(vi)           of the filing of all involuntary petition in bankruptcy with respect to the other Party;

 

(vii)          any proceedings for the reorganization of the other Party, or for the readjustment of any of the other Party’s debts, under any laws, now or hereafter existing, for the relief of insolvent debtors, will be commenced by or against the other Party; or

 

(viii)         of the discontinuation by the other Party of its business;

 

(c)            Buyer, by written notice, in the event that after the Commencement Date, General Moly fails to meet the delivery requirements of Products set forth in Section 2 for a period of three consecutive months; or

 

(d)            Buyer, by written notice, in accordance with Sections 2.1 and 7 .

 

5.3            Effect of Termination . Unless notified otherwise by Buyer, upon a termination of this Agreement, General Moly will fill all outstanding obligations to supply the Products in accordance with the terms of this Agreement through the date of termination. Buyer will accept and pay for all conforming Products delivered in accordance herewith. Termination will be without prejudice to the rights and obligations of the Parties which have accrued prior to the effective date of termination. Sections 1 , 4 and 6 through 24 will survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.

 

8



 

6.              Indemnification .

 

6.1            Procedure . if Buyer claims that any of the Products fail to conform with the Specifications or fail to be in compliance with all applicable laws (excluding claims relating to Assay Adjustments which will be resolved in accordance with Section 4.3 ), Buyer will notify General Moly of its claim (“ Claim ”), and provide General Moly with all relevant documentation of the Claim, no later than sixty (60) days after the date of delivery of such Products to Buyer. Upon receipt of a Claim, General Moly will have the right to inspect such Products and all evidence of the Claim, and General Moly and Buyer will make a good faith attempt to reach an agreement as to whether the Claim is valid.

 

6.2            Remedies . If it is determined by the Parties that the Claim is valid, General Moly will promptly elect one of the following actions to remedy the failure, and will deliver notice thereof to Buyer thirty (30) days prior to taking any such action:

 

(a)            promptly delivering to Buyer (to the original destination, unless otherwise agreed) at no additional cost to Buyer, conforming Products to replace the non-conforming Products;

 

(b)            promptly refunding to Buyer the Product Price paid by Buyer for the non-conforming Products; provided that General Moly will have the option to take possession of the non-conforming Products; and provided that the quantities of such non-conforming Products shall be deducted from the quantity of Products that Buyer is required to purchase hereunder; or

 

(c)            applying a credit, equal to the Product Price paid by Buyer for the non-conforming Products, to the next purchase to be made by Buyer hereunder provided that the quantities of such non-conforming Product shall be deducted from the quantity of Products that Buyer is required to purchase hereunder.

 

If, upon receipt of notice of the intent to take one of the actions above, Buyer instead desires General Moly to take another action listed above to remedy the failure, Buyer will deliver notice of such desire to General Moly. If upon delivery of such notice the Parties do not agree on the action to be taken, such matter will be resolved pursuant to the arbitration procedures set forth in Section 21 . Buyer agrees that General Moly may offer and sell any non-conforming Products rejected pursuant to a Claim under this Section 6.2 within the Sales Territory after Buyer has been offered and rejected an offer to purchase such non-conforming Products; provided, however , that any such offer and sale by General Moly of non-conforming Products within the Sales Territory be upon the same terms and conditions, including pricing, as offered by General Moly to Buyer.

 

If the Parties cannot agree on the validity of a Claim, such matter will be considered a Dispute and will be resolved pursuant to the arbitration procedures set forth in Section 21 .

 

6.3            Warranties .

 

Subject to the limits set forth in Section 6.4 , GENERAL MOLY WARRANTS TO BUYER THAT AT THE TIME THE PRODUCTS ARE SHIPPED, THE PRODUCTS WILL (I) 

 

9



 

CONFORM TO THE SPECIFICATIONS, AND (II) BE OWNED SOLELY BY GENERAL MOLY AND BE FREE FROM ANY SECURITY INTEREST, LIEN OR OTHER ENCUMBRANCE. GENERAL MOLY WARRANTS TO BUYER THAT ALL WORK PERFORMED PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT BY GENERAL MOLY WILL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS INCLUDING ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS.

 

6.4            Limitations . The remedies set forth in Sections 6.2 and 6.5 will be Buyer’s sole remedies for any Claims. TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, EXCEPT AS PROVIDED HEREIN, GENERAL MOLY EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS, AND MAKES NO OTHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF ANY TYPE, WHETHER OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE OR OTHERWISE, WITH RESPECT TO THE PRODUCTS.

 

6.5            Indemnification by General Moly . General Moly will at all times defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless Buyer and its affiliates and their directors, officers, agents, employees, participants and assigns, from and against any and all Losses arising in whole or in part out of the willful misconduct and/or gross negligence in the performance of any obligations of General Moly under this Agreement; provided however , that General Moly will not be required to indemnify any indemnified Person for any Losses to the extent resulting from the misconduct or gross negligence of such indemnified Person.

 

6.6            Indemnification by Buyer . Buyer will at all times defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless General Moly and its affiliates and their directors, officers, agents, employees, participants and assigns, from and against any and all Losses whatsoever arising in whole or in part out of the willful misconduct and/or gross negligence in the performance of any obligations of Buyer under this Agreement; provided however , that Buyer will not be required to indemnify any indemnified Person for any Losses to the extent resulting from the misconduct or gross negligence of such indemnified Person.

 

7.              Force Majeure . Neither Party will be liable to the other Party for default or delay in the performance of its obligations hereunder when and to the extent that such default or delay is caused by an order, injunction or stay entered by any court with valid jurisdiction, war, civil commotion, strike, labor dispute, work stoppage or slowdown, storm, earthquake, explosion, insurrection, epidemic or quarantine restriction, fire, flood, act of God, or any other similar contingency beyond the reasonable control of the Party seeking to be excused from performing its obligations hereunder pursuant to this Section 7 (the occurrence of any of the foregoing will be an “ Event of Force Majeure ”). The occurrence of an Event of Force Majeure will not be grounds for termination of this Agreement, absent the written consent of the Parties otherwise; provided, however , that Buyer may, at its option, terminate this Agreement if an Event of Force Majeure prevents, or Buyer reasonably anticipates that it will prevent, General Moly from meeting its obligations in whole or in substantial part under this Agreement for more than three (3) consecutive months during the Term. If an Event of Force Majeure prevents a Party from meeting its obligations hereunder in part, but not in whole, the Parties will use their commercially reasonable best efforts to equitably adjust the Parties’ respective obligations hereunder consistent with and in furtherance of the purposes hereof. Should General Moly invoke force majeure conditions, Buyer will be entitled to obtain from alternative sources such

 

10



 

Products as it reasonably requires during the period that Events of Force Majeure subsist, and the quantities of Products obtained under such conditions will be deducted from the amount of Products Buyer is required to purchase hereunder.

 

8.              Confidentiality .

 

8.1            During the Term, each of Buyer and General Moly will be in a position to receive certain of each other’s confidential, privileged and proprietary information (“ Confidential Information ”). Confidential Information excludes any information:

 

(a)            which is or becomes available to the public through no act, omission or fault of, and absent any breach of a covenant or obligation hereunder by, a Party;

 

(b)            which a Party may have received lawfully from any third party without restrictions as to disclosure thereof and without breach of this Agreement; or

 

(c)            which was developed by a Party without (as established by documentation or by other appropriate evidence) the use of the other Party’s Confidential Information or any breach of this Agreement or any other agreement.

 

General Moly agrees that the Confidential Information of Buyer, and Buyer agrees that the Confidential Information of General Moly, is an integral and key part of the assets of each respective entity and that the unauthorized use or disclosure of the other Party’s Confidential Information would seriously damage the owner thereof in its business. As a consequence of the above, General Moly and Buyer hereby agree that, during the Term and for a period of five (5) years after the expiration or termination hereof:

 

8.1.1         Neither of General Moly and Buyer will, directly or indirectly:

 

(a)            use any of the other Party’s Confidential Information, except as may be necessary to perform its obligations hereunder; or

 

(b)            disclose, furnish or make accessible, or cause any Person to disclose, furnish or make accessible, any aspect of the other Party’s Confidential Information to any Person (other than its employees and representatives who require access to such Confidential Information in connection with this Agreement and agree to keep such Confidential Information confidential in accordance with this Agreement).

 

8.1.2         Each of General Moly and Buyer will:

 

(a)            use no less than the care a reasonably prudent Person would use in safeguarding his, her or its Confidential Information;

 

(b)            limit access to the other Party’s Confidential Information to its employees and representatives who require access to such Confidential Information for the purposes of performing its obligations hereunder and who have agreed to be bound by the terms of this Section 8 ; and

 

11



 

(c)            refrain from any action or conduct which might reasonably or foreseeably be expected to compromise the confidential, privileged or proprietary nature or the other Party’s Confidential Information.

 

8.1.3         Each of General Moly and Buyer will comply with reasonable requests made by the other from time to time regarding the protection of the confidential, privileged and proprietary nature of the other Party’s Confidential Information. Upon the written request of either Party, the other Party will promptly return to the requesting Party all of the requesting Party’s Confidential Information, including any and all copies and summaries thereof, in each case in any format (whether written, electronic or otherwise).

 

8.1.4         For purposes of this Section 8 , the term “General Moly” will include all Affiliates of General Moly, and the term “Buyer” will include all Affiliates of Buyer. Nothing in this Section 8 will operate to prevent a Party from disclosing such information as is required by (a) applicable law, (b) a valid court order or (c) the rules or policies of any securities exchange on which a Party’s securities may be listed or as may be expressly authorized by the other Party in writing in advance of any such disclosure; provided, however , that in the case of a disclosure pursuant to clause (a), (b) or (c) of this sentence, prior to any such disclosure, the Party whose obligation it is to keep such information confidential will give the other Party notice of the circumstances relating to such required disclosure and a reasonable opportunity to seek an appropriate protective order with respect thereto.

 

9.              Waiver . The failure of any Party to enforce at any time any of the provisions of this Agreement will in no way be construed to constitute a waiver of any such provision nor in any way to affect the validity of this Agreement or any part hereof, including the right of any Party thereafter to enforce each and every provision. The waiver by any Party of any breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement by the other Party will not operate or be construed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation thereof.

 

10.            Governing Law . This Agreement will be governed by the laws of the State of New York, without giving effect to any of the provisions thereof that would require the application of the substantive laws of any other jurisdiction.

 

11.            Notices . All notices and other communications hereunder will be effective if in writing and delivered (a) in person (which will be deemed to be received upon receipt), (b) by overnight courier (which will be deemed to be received one Business Day thereafter), (c) by facsimile transmission (which will be deemed to be received upon receipt) or (d) mailed by certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested (which will be deemed to be received three Business Days thereafter), as follows (or at such other address for a Party as will be specified by like notice):

 

If to General Moly:

 

General Moly, Inc.

1726 Cole Blvd., Suite 115

Lakewood, Colorado 80401

Attention:               Chief Executive Officer

Facsimile:                (303) 928-8598

 

12



 

With a copy (which will not constitute notice) to:

 

K&L Gates LLP

925 Fourth Avenue, Suite 2900

Seattle, Washington 98104

Attention:               Gary J. Kocher

Facsimile:                (206) 623-7022

 

If to Buyer:

 

Sojitz Corporation

Ferroalloys Department

1-20, Akasaka 6-chome, Minato-ku

Tokyo 107-8655, Japan

Attention:               General Manager

Facsimile:                +81-3-5520-3517

 

With a copy (which will not constitute notice) to:

 

Sojitz Corporation of America

1211 Avenue of the Americas

New York, New York 10036

Attention:               Legal Department

Facsimile:                (212) 704-6935

 

All such notices and other communications will be effective when received.

 

12.            Interpretation . The Parties have participated jointly in the negotiation and drafting of this Agreement. If an ambiguity or question of intent or interpretation arises, this Agreement will be construed as if drafted jointly by the Parties and no presumption or burden of proof will arise favoring or disfavoring any Party because of the authorship of any provision of this Agreement.

 

13.            Assignment . This Agreement will be binding upon, inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the respective successors and permitted assigns of the Parties. This Agreement may not be assigned or otherwise transferred by Buyer or General Moly without the prior written consent of the other Party; provided that Buyer may, without the consent of General Moly, assign its rights and obligations under this Agreement to an Affiliate of Buyer. Buyer hereby acknowledges that any proposed assignment by Buyer to any other Party, by operation of law or otherwise, is subject to General Moly’s consent, which will be in General Moly’s sole discretion and may be conditioned upon amendment to the payment terms set forth herein.

 

14.            Relationship of the Parties . It is understood that each Party is conducting business as a separate and distinct legal entity. Under no circumstances will either Party, its agents and/or employees be considered agents, partners, representatives or employees of the

 

13



 

other Party. Neither Party will have the right to act as the legal representative of the other Party or to bind such other Party in any respect whatsoever or to incur any debts or liability in the name of or on behalf of such other Party. This Agreement creates no relationships of joint venturers, partners, associates or principal and agent between the Parties.

 

15.            Severability . The provisions of this Agreement will be deemed severable and the invalidity or unenforceability of any provision will not affect the validity or enforceability of the other provisions hereof; provided that if any provision of this Agreement, as applied to any Party or to any circumstance, is adjudged by a governmental body, arbitrator, or mediator not to be enforceable in accordance with its terms, the Parties agree that the governmental body, arbitrator, or mediator making such determination will have the power to modify the provision in a manner consistent with its objectives such that it is enforceable, and/or to delete specific words or phrases, and in its reduced form, such provision will then be enforceable and will be enforced.

 

16.            Taxes and Expenses . Except as expressly provided herein and without modifying or otherwise limiting the payment obligations of the Parties pursuant to “CIF” deliveries as set forth herein, each Party will be responsible for payment of all taxes, if any, imposed upon it by applicable law in connection with this Agreement; provided, that (a) General Moly will bear all taxes and expenses imposed on it, in connection with this Agreement or the Products, prior to delivery of the Products pursuant to Section 4.1 , including any mining, mineral, export or related taxes, and (b) Buyer will bear all taxes and expenses imposed on it in connection with this Agreement or the Products, after such delivery, including any import taxes to Japan or Korea. Each Party will pay all of its own administrative expenses, including the fees and expenses of its counsel and other agents and representatives, incurred in connection with the preparation, execution and performance of this Agreement.

 

17.            Currency . All references to dollars or amounts of money in this Agreement are references to United States Dollars.

 

18.            Counterparts; Facsimile Signatures . This Agreement may be executed in two counterparts, and each such counterpart will be deemed to be an original instrument, but all such counterparts together will constitute but one agreement. This Agreement may be executed by facsimile signatures.

 

19.            Entire Agreement . This Agreement, including the attached Exhibits which are hereby incorporated herein by this reference, constitutes the entire agreement and understanding of the Parties in respect of its subject matter and supersedes all prior understandings, agreements, or representations by or among the Parties, written or oral, to the extent they relate in any way to the subject matter hereof.

 

20.            Amendment . No amendment, modification or addition to this Agreement will be effective unless it is in writing and executed by both Parties.

 

21.            Arbitration .

 

21.1          Good Faith Negotiation . In the event of any dispute, claim or controversy (except with respect to assaying issues as set forth in Section 4.3 ) (a “ Dispute ”) arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, a Party may deliver written notice to the other Party of such

 

14



 

Dispute requesting to resolve such Dispute pursuant to this Agreement. Upon delivery of such notice, members of senior management of each Party will meet as promptly as practicable in a good faith attempt to resolve such Dispute.

 

21.2          Binding Arbitration .

 

21.2.1       If a Dispute is not resolved pursuant to Section 21.1 by the Parties within thirty (30) days of the delivery of written notice thereof (or such longer period as the Parties may mutually agree), either Party may make a written demand for binding arbitration in accordance with this Section 21.2 . The Dispute will then be submitted to and resolved by binding arbitration in accordance with the Rules of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce by an Arbitral Tribunal appointed in accordance with such Rules. The arbitration will be conducted in New York, New York. The Arbitral Tribunal shall comprise three arbitrators. Each of General Moly and Buyer will appoint one arbitrator. The two arbitrators so appointed will together appoint the third arbitrator. if Buyer or General Moly fails to choose an arbitrator within fourteen (14) days after receiving notice of commencement of arbitration, or if the two arbitrators fail to choose a third arbitrator within fourteen (14) days after their appointment, the Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce shall upon the request of Buyer or General Moly appoint the arbitrator(s) to complete the Arbitral Tribunal. The arbitration will be governed in accordance with (i) the provisions of this Agreement and (ii) the governing law as specified in Section 10 .

 

21.2.2       The arbitration shall be conducted in English, and all documents delivered or produced pursuant to the arbitration shall be in English. The Parties will provide to the arbitrators all information pertaining to the dispute that the arbitrators may request, provided that all information supplied by any Party will be deemed to be confidential, and the arbitrators and other participants in the dispute will protect such information from disclosure to the same extent as provided in Section 8 .

 

21.2.3       The arbitrators will be instructed to render a decision within sixty (60) days after selection and will be required to state in writing the reasoning on which the decision and any award rests. The arbitrators will have the power to award counsel fees and expenses, as well as dispute resolution costs (including any fee for the arbitrators), to the prevailing Party. Judgment upon the award rendered may be entered in any court having jurisdiction or application may be made to such court for a judicial acceptance of the award and an order of enforcement, as the case may be. The arbitrators will not award any consequential, incidental, indirect, special, punitive or exemplary damages hereunder or in connection herewith. The arbitration award shall be final and binding upon the Parties to such arbitration and may be enforced in any court having jurisdiction.

 

21.2.4       The performance of this Agreement shall not be suspended, cease or be delayed by the reference of a Dispute to arbitration.

 

21.3          Limitations . Notwithstanding anything contained in this Section 21 , all disputes regarding Assay Adjustments will be resolved in accordance with Section 4.3 . In addition, nothing contained in this Section 21 will prohibit or limit any Party from seeking and obtaining

 

15



 

equitable relief (including temporary restraining orders and preliminary and permanent injunctions or stays) to which it would otherwise be entitled from a court of competent jurisdiction.

 

22.            Limitation of Liability . UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES WILL GENERAL MOLY OR BUYER BE LIABLE FOR CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, PUNITIVE OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES HEREUNDER OR IN CONNECTION HEREWITH.

 

23.            Third Party Beneficiaries . Except as expressly contemplated by Sections 6.5 and 6.6 , there are no third party beneficiaries having rights under or with respect to this Agreement.

 

24.            Remedies Cumulative . All remedies available to the Parties for breach of this Agreement are cumulative and may be exercised concurrently or separately, and the exercise of any one remedy shall not be deemed an election of such remedy to the exclusion of other remedies.

 

[Signature page follows]

 

16



 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Buyer and General Moly have duly executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.

 

 

GENERAL MOLY, INC.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:

 

/s/ Bruce D. Hansen

 

Name:

Bruce D. Hansen

 

Title:

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SOJITZ CORPORATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:

 

/s/ Kazuyoshi Shioda

 

Name:

Kazuyoshi Shioda

 

Title:

General Manager, Ferroalloys Dept.

 

[Signature Page to Molybdenum Supply Agreement]

 



 

Exhibit A

 

Specifications

 

SPECIFICATION MOLYBDENUM OXIDE

 

Mo

[****]

 

 

Cu

[****]

 

 

S

[****]

 

 

C

[****]

 

 

P

[****]

 

 

Si

[****]

 

 

Pb

[****]

 

 

Zn

[****]

 

 

Other elements

[****]

 



 

Exhibit B

 

Existing Obligations

 

Name of Purchaser

 

*Quantity of TMO per Month/Year

 

**Term of Supply Obligation

 

 

 

 

 

[****]

 

[****]

 

[****]

 


*               All quantities are listed in terms of molybdenum units regardless of gross weight.

 

**            General Moly shall promptly notify Buyer of the date of first supply.

 

19


EXHIBIT 31.1

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Bruce D. Hansen, certify that:

 

1.                                        I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of General Moly, Inc.;

 

2.                                        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.                                        The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a–15(f) and 15d–15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

a.                                        designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b.                                    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

c.                                        evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

d.                                       disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.                                        The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a.                                        all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b.                                       any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Dated: November 3, 2008

 

 

By:

 

/s/ Bruce D. Hansen

 

Name:

Bruce D. Hansen

 

Title:

Chief Executive Officer

 


EXHIBIT 31.2

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, David A. Chaput, certify that:

 

1.                                        I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of General Moly, Inc.;

 

2.                                        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.                                        The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a–15(f) and 15d–15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

a.                                        designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b.                                       designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

c.                                        evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

d.                                       disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.                                        The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a.                                        all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b.                                       any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Dated: November 3, 2008

 

 

By:

 

/s/ David A. Chaput

 

Name:

David A. Chaput

 

Title:

Chief Financial Officer

 


EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Bruce D. Hansen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of General Moly, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of General Moly, Inc.

 

Dated: November 3, 2008

 

 

By:

 

/s/ Bruce D. Hansen

 

Name:

Bruce D. Hansen

 

Title:

Chief Executive Officer

 

(Principal Executive Officer)

 


EXHIBIT 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, David A. Chaput, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of General Moly, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of General Moly, Inc.

 

Dated: November 3, 2008

 

 

By:

 

/s/ David A. Chaput

 

Name:

David A. Chaput

 

Title:

Chief Financial Officer