UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
Current Report
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): September 2 , 2011
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE |
|
1-13627 |
|
26-4413382 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(Commission File Number) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
350 Indiana Street, Suite 800
Golden, Colorado 80401
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (303) 839-5060
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):
o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement
Effective September 2, 2011, the Board of Directors (the Board) of Golden Minerals Company (Golden Minerals) adopted a stock option plan (the Replacement Stock Option Plan) pursuant to which the Golden Minerals Replacement Options (as defined in Item 2.01 below) were issued in connection with the Arrangement (as defined in Item 2.01 below), as further described in Item 2.01 below and incorporated herein by reference.
On September 2, 2011, ECU Silver Mining Inc. (ECU), Golden Minerals and Computershare Trust Company of Canada (Computershare) entered into two separate supplemental warrant indentures (collectively, the Supplemental Warrant Indentures) to govern the terms and conditions of the Golden Minerals Replacement Warrants (as defined in Item 2.01 below) to be issued in exchange for the ECU Warrants (as defined in Item 2.01 below) issued under ECUs February 2009 Warrant Indenture, as amended and supplemented, and ECUs December 2009 Warrant Indenture in connection with the Arrangement (as defined in Item 2.01 below), as further described in Item 2.01 below and incorporated herein by reference.
The foregoing descriptions of the Replacement Stock Option Plan and the Supplemental Warrant Indentures, and the further descriptions contained in Item 2.01 below, do not purport to be complete and are qualified in their entirety by reference to the full text of the Replacement Stock Option Plan, which was attached as Exhibit 4.1 to Golden Minerals Form S-8 Registration Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 2, 2011 and is incorporated herein by reference, and the full text of the Supplemental Warrant Indentures, which are attached hereto as Exhibits 10.1 and 10.2 and incorporated herein by reference.
Certain Mexican subsidiaries of ECU are borrowers under a financing arrangement with IIG Capital LLC as representative of The IIG Trade Opportunities Fund N.V. and/or The Venezuela Recovery Fund N.V., pursuant to which ECU is a joint surety. The principal amount outstanding at June 30, 2011 was approximately US$16,618,541. Principal repayments are payable in 30 equal monthly payments commencing July 31, 2011 and ending December 31, 2013. Interest is payable quarterly and is calculated at the greater of 12% and the 1 month London Interbank Offered Rate plus 6%. The loan is secured by first priority security interests covering certain of the current mining properties of the Mexican subsidiaries, including current and future facilities constructed thereon. ECU and its subsidiaries became subsidiaries of Golden Minerals effective September 2, 2011, upon consummation of the Arrangement, defined and described below in Item 2.01.
Item 2.01 Completion of Acquisition or Disposition of Assets
On September 2, 2011, Golden Minerals completed its previously announced business combination with ECU. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Arrangement Agreement, dated June 24, 2011, between Golden Minerals and ECU (the Arrangement Agreement), the businesses of Golden Minerals and ECU were combined by way of a court-approved plan of arrangement (the Arrangement) pursuant to the provisions of the Business Corporations Act ( Québ ec) (the QBCA).
Pursuant to the Arrangement Agreement:
· each ECU common share outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the Arrangement on September 2, 2011 (the Effective Time) was exchanged for the right to receive 0.05 shares of Golden Minerals common stock (the Exchange Ratio) and Cdn$0.000394 in cash;
· each warrant to purchase ECU common shares (an ECU Warrant) outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time issued pursuant to ECUs February 2009 Warrant Indenture or ECUs December 2009 Warrant Indenture was exchanged for the right to receive a warrant to purchase shares of Golden Minerals common stock (a Golden Minerals Replacement Warrant) issued pursuant to the respective Supplemental Warrant Indenture which is exercisable to acquire, on the same terms and conditions as were applicable to such ECU Warrant immediately prior to the Effective Time, the number of shares of Golden Minerals common stock (rounded to the nearest whole number) as the holder would have acquired if such holder would have exercised such ECU Warrant immediately prior to the Effective Time; the exercise price per Golden Minerals Replacement Warrant is an amount equal to the quotient of: (A) the exercise price of the corresponding ECU Warrant and (B) the Exchange Ratio; the Golden Minerals Replacement Warrants have the same expiration dates as the corresponding ECU Warrants; and
· each option to purchase ECU common shares (an ECU Option) outstanding immediately prior
to the Effective Time granted under the ECUs stock option plan was exchanged for an option granted under the Replacement Stock Option Plan to purchase shares of Golden Minerals common stock (a Golden Minerals Replacement Option), which is exercisable to acquire, substantially on the same terms and conditions as were applicable to the corresponding ECU Options, the number of shares of Golden Minerals common stock (rounded to the nearest whole number) as the holder would have acquired if such holder would have exercised such ECU Option immediately prior to the Effective Time; the exercise price of each Golden Minerals Replacement Option is an amount equal to the quotient of: (A) the exercise price of the corresponding ECU Option immediately prior to the Effective Time divided by (B) the Exchange Ratio; the Golden Minerals Replacement Options have the same expiration dates as the corresponding ECU Options subject to certain adjustments set forth in the Replacement Stock Option Plan.
In the aggregate, Golden Minerals issued 16,004,111 shares of common stock, 661,750 Golden Minerals Replacement Options, and 2,218,292 Golden Minerals Replacement Warrants, and paid approximately Cdn$126,112 in cash, as consideration in the Arrangement.
The foregoing description of the Arrangement Agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Arrangement Agreement, which was attached as Exhibit 2.1 to Golden Minerals Current Report on Form 8-K dated filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 30, 2011 and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 2.03 Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant
The final paragraph in Item 1.01, which describes the obligations of ECU and certain of its Mexican subsidiaries under a financing arrangement, is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 3.02 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
As indicated in Item 2.01 above, the consideration paid by Golden Minerals in connection with the acquisition of all of the shares of ECU included the issuance of 16,004,111 shares of Golden Minerals common stock, Golden Minerals Replacement Options exercisable for 661,750 shares of Golden Minerals common stock, and Golden Minerals Replacement Warrants exercisable for 2,218,292 shares of Golden Minerals common stock (the Arrangement Securities). The Arrangement Securities have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act). The acquisition of all of the securities of ECU pursuant to a plan of arrangement was approved by the Superior Court of Québec in accordance with the provisions of the QBCA. Accordingly, the Arrangement Securities are exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act.
The consummation of the Arrangement constituted a change of control of ECU pursuant to ECUs compensation arrangements with certain of its executive officers. In accordance with his compensation arrangement, ECUs former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Michel Roy, was entitled to receive a cash payment of Cdn$1,500,000 upon the consummation of the Arrangement. Golden Minerals and Mr. Roy agreed that Golden Minerals would issue 113,208 new shares of Golden Minerals common stock (the Roy Shares) in full satisfaction of the amount payable to Mr. Roy. The number of Roy Shares issued was calculated by dividing the amount of the cash payment by the five day volume weighted average price of Golden Minerals common stock on the NYSE Amex for the five trading days immediately prior to September 2, 2011, the day on which the Arrangement was consummated. The Roy Shares have not been registered under the Securities Act and were issued to Mr. Roy pursuant to Regulation S and in reliance on the exemption from registration contained in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. Golden Minerals has imposed appropriate limitations on the resale of the Roy Shares.
Item 5.01 Changes in Control of Registrant
Upon consummation of the Arrangement, the shareholders of ECU immediately prior to the Effective Time became the owners of approximately 51% of the outstanding common stock of Golden Minerals, resulting in a change in control for Golden Minerals stockholders. In connection with the Arrangement, Golden Minerals and ECU agreed that Michael T. Mason, a former director of ECU, would be appointed to the Board as further described in Item 5.02 below and incorporated by reference herein.
The description of the Arrangement set forth in Item 2.01 of this Current Report on Form 8-K is incorporated by reference into this Item 5.01.
Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Principal Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Principal Officers
In connection with the Arrangement, on August 31, 2011, the Board increased the number of directors serving on the Board from six to seven and elected Michael T. Mason to fill the newly created directorship effective as of the Effective Time. Mr. Mason was a director of ECU prior to the consummation of the Arrangement and has more than 40 years experience in the minerals industry. Currently Mr. Mason is both a director and Chief Executive Officer of Geovic Mining Corporation. He is also a Managing Partner of Mineral Services, LLC.
At the Effective Time, Mr. Masons 85,000 ECU common shares were exchanged, at the same ratio as all other ECU common shareholders, for the right to receive 4,250 shares of Golden Minerals common stock and a cash payment of approximately Cdn$33.50. In addition, at the Effective Time, Mr. Mason held (i) 270,000 ECU Options with an exercise price of Cdn$2.40 that were exchanged for 13,500 Golden Minerals Replacement Options with an exercise price of Cdn$48.00, (ii) 225,000 ECU Options with an exercise price of Cdn$1.70 that were exchanged for 11,250 Golden Minerals Replacement Options with an exercise price of Cdn$34.00, and (iii) 100,000 ECU Options with an exercise price of Cdn$0.80 that were exchanged for 5,000 Golden Minerals Replacement Options with an exercise price of Cdn$16.00, with each exchange calculated as described above in Item 2.01.
Mr. Mason will be entitled to receive the same compensation for service as a non-employee director as is currently provided to the other non-employee directors serving on the Board. In connection with his appointment to the Board, Mr. Mason was granted 2,871 restricted stock units, which is the same number of restricted stock units granted to the other non-employee director in May 2011. Mr. Masons restricted stock units will vest after one year and represent a contingent right to receive one share of Golden Minerals common stock on the date on which Mr. Mason ceases to be a member of the Board.
Item 5.03 Amendments to Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws ; Change in Fiscal Year
At the Special Meeting of Stockholders of Golden Minerals held on August 30, 2011, Golden Minerals stockholders approved a proposal to amend Golden Minerals certificate of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares to 100,000,000 shares of common stock. On September 2, 2011, Golden Minerals filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware a First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Golden Minerals Company increasing its authorized capital from 50,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, to 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share.
A copy of the First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Golden Minerals Company is filed as Exhibit 3.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K, and the preceding description of the amendment is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text thereof, which is incorporated by reference.
Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits
(a) Financial Statements of Business Acquired . The audited consolidated financial statements of ECU for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 and related footnotes, and the unaudited consolidated financial statements of ECU as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2011, are attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated herein by reference.
(b) Pro Forma Financial Information . The unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial statement of Golden Minerals for the year ended December 31, 2010, and as of and for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, are attached hereto as Exhibit 99.2 and incorporated herein by reference.
(d) Exhibits .
Exhibit
|
|
Description |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Arrangement Agreement, dated June 24, 2011, between Golden Minerals Company and ECU Silver Mining Inc.(1) |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Golden Minerals Company. |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Golden Minerals Company Replacement Stock Option Plan.(2) |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
Supplemental Warrant Indenture, dated September 2, 2011, by and among Golden Minerals, ECU Silver Mining Inc, and Computershare. |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
Third Supplemental Warrant Indenture, dated September 2, 2011, by and among Golden Minerals, ECU Silver Mining Inc, and Computershare. |
|
|
|
99.1 |
|
Historical Consolidated Financial Statements of ECU Silver Mining Inc. |
|
|
|
99.2 |
|
Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Condensed Financial Statements of Golden Minerals Company. |
(1) Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 30, 2011.
(2) Incorporated by reference to our Form S-8 Registration Statement filed September 2, 2011.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
Date: September 9, 2011
|
|
Golden Minerals Company |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Robert P. Vogels |
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Robert P. Vogels |
|
|
|
Title: |
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
|
|
Description |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Arrangement Agreement, dated June 24, 2011, between Golden Minerals Company and ECU Silver Mining Inc.(1) |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Golden Minerals Company. |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Golden Minerals Company Replacement Stock Option Plan.(2) |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
Supplemental Warrant Indenture, dated September 2, 2011, by and among Golden Minerals, ECU Silver Mining Inc, and Computershare. |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
Third Supplemental Warrant Indenture, dated September 2, 2011, by and among Golden Minerals, ECU Silver Mining Inc, and Computershare. |
|
|
|
99.1 |
|
Historical Consolidated Financial Statements of ECU Silver Mining Inc. |
|
|
|
99.2 |
|
Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Condensed Financial Statements of Golden Minerals Company. |
(1) Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 30, 2011.
(2) Incorporated by reference to our Form S-8 Registration Statement filed September 2, 2011.
Exhibit 3.1
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
a Delaware corporation
* * * * *
Pursuant to Section 242
of the Delaware General Corporation Law
* * * * *
Golden Mineral Company, a Delaware corporation (the Corporation ), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:
1. The Corporation filed its original Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on March 6, 2009.
2. The Corporation filed its Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on March 24, 2009.
3. This First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation has been duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.
4. Article 4.1(a) of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety to read as follows:
(a) The total number of shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share ( Common Stock ), that the Company is authorized to issue is 100,000,000.
5. Except as provided in this amendment, the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation is unchanged and remains in full force and effect.
* * * * *
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to be executed by its duly authorized officer as of the 2nd day of September, 2011.
|
Golden Minerals Company,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Deborah Friedman |
Exhibit 10.1
SUPPLEMENTAL WARRANT INDENTURE
THIS SUPPLEMENTAL WARRANT INDENTURE is dated September 2, 2011.
BETWEEN:
ECU SILVER MINING INC , a company governed under the laws of the Province of Québec
( ECU )
AND:
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY , a company incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware
( Golden )
AND:
COMPUTERSHARE TRUST COMPANY OF CANADA , a trust company incorporated under the laws of Canada
(the Warrant Agent )
WHEREAS on December 9, 2009, ECU entered into a warrant indenture (the Indenture ), with the Warrant Agent pursuant to which 8,473,000 warrants of ECU to purchase common shares in the capital of ECU ( ECU Common Shares ) at a price of $0.90 per ECU Common Share until 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on December 9, 2011 were created and authorized to be issued (the Warrants );
AND WHEREAS ECU and Golden have entered into an arrangement agreement dated June 24, 2011 (the Arrangement Agreement ) providing for, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions precedent, ECU and Golden to effect a plan of arrangement (the Plan of Arrangement ) pursuant to which Golden will acquire all of the issued and outstanding ECU Common Shares such that ECU will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Golden;
AND WHEREAS the consideration payable by Golden for each ECU Common Share, other than those ECU Common Shares, if any, in respect of which dissent rights have been duly and validly exercised, and those ECU Common Shares, if any, held by Golden or any of its affiliates, will be 0.05 (the Exchange Ratio ) of a share of common stock in the capital of Golden (a Golden Share ) plus $0.000394;
AND WHEREAS under the terms of the Arrangement Agreement and the Plan of Arrangement and in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Indenture, including, without limitation, Section 10.2 of the Indenture, from and after the effective time of the Plan of Arrangement as contemplated therein (the Effective Time ), the Warrants held by each Warrantholder will be exchanged for replacement warrants of Golden ( Golden Warrants ) that represent the right to acquire for the same aggregate consideration that number of Golden Shares that a Warrantholder would have been entitled to acquire in connection with the Plan of Arrangement if, immediately prior to the Effective Time, it had exercised its Warrants and had been the registered holder of the number of ECU Common Shares to which it was theretofor entitled upon exercise of such Warrants;
AND WHEREAS Golden will have the benefit of and be liable for ECUs rights and obligations under the Indenture;
AND WHEREAS the parties are entering into this Supplemental Warrant Indenture (the Supplemental Warrant Indenture ) to evidence the rights of the Warrantholders under the terms of the Indenture as a result of the Plan of Arrangement;
NOW THEREFORE THIS SUPPLEMENTAL WARRANT INDENTURE WITNESSES THAT , in consideration of the premises and in further consideration of the mutual covenants herein set forth, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Unless otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms in this Supplemental Warrant Indenture shall have the respective meanings ascribed to such terms in the Indenture.
2. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Indenture, the outstanding Warrants held by each Warrantholder at the Effective Time shall be exchanged for Golden Warrants that represent the right to acquire that number of Golden Shares that a Warrantholder would have been entitled to acquire in connection with the Plan of Arrangement if, immediately prior to the Effective Time, it had exercised its Warrants and had been the registered holder of the number of ECU Common Shares to which it was theretofor entitled upon exercise of the Warrants. Accordingly, as at the Effective Time, the outstanding Warrants held by each Warrantholder will hereby be exchanged for that number of Golden Warrants as is equal to the product of (i) the number of Warrants held by such Warrantholder, multiplied by (ii) the Exchange Ratio; provided however that no fractional Golden Warrants shall be issued to any person such that the number Golden Warrants to be issued to any person pursuant to the Plan of Arrangement shall be rounded up or down, as applicable, to the nearest whole Golden Warrant. For greater certainty, where such fractional interest is greater than or equal to 0.5, the number of Golden Warrants to be issued will be rounded up to the nearest whole number and where such fractional interest is less than 0.5, the number of Golden Warrants to be issued will be rounded down to the nearest whole number. In calculating such fractional interests, all Warrants registered in the name of or beneficially held by a Warrantholder or its nominee shall be aggregated.
3. The exercise price of each Golden Warrant shall be $18.00 (being the Exercise Price of one Warrant divided by the Exchange Ratio).
4. ECU and the Warrant Agent acknowledge and agree that from and after the Effective Time, Golden shall have all of the rights and be subject to all of the obligations of ECU under the Indenture, except as otherwise provided in this Supplemental Warrant Indenture.
5. Golden acknowledges and agrees that from and after the Effective Time, Golden will assume the performance of each and every covenant and obligation contained in the Indenture, as modified by this Supplemental Warrant Indenture, to be performed by ECU.
6. From and after the Effective Time, the parties agree that all references to ECU Silver Mining Inc. in the Indenture shall be read to mean Golden Minerals Company.
7. From and after the Effective Time, the parties agree that all references to Warrants in the Indenture shall be read to mean Golden Warrants as defined herein.
8. From and after the Effective Time, the definitions of Common Shares, Corporation Corporations Auditors and Exercise Price respectively set forth in Sections 1.1(k), 1.1(l), 1.1(m) and 1.1(v) of the Indenture shall be deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following:
Common Shares means shares of common stock in the capital of the Corporation;
Corporation means Golden Minerals Company and includes any successor corporation thereto;
Corporations Auditors means PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the firm of chartered accountants duly appointed as auditors of the Corporation, or such other firm as may be duly appointed as auditors of the Corporation from time to time;
Exercise Price means $18.00 per Common Share, unless such price shall have been adjusted in accordance with the provisions of Article 5, in which case it shall mean the adjusted price in effect at such time;
9. From and after the Effective Time, the definitions of 1933 Act, Regulation S, SEC, United States and U.S. Person respectively set forth in Sections 1.1(a), 1.1(aa), 1.1(dd), 1.1(kk) and 1.1(ll) of the Indenture shall be deleted in their entirety and each shall be replaced with the following:
[RESERVED.]
10. From and after the Effective Time, notwithstanding Section 1.9 of the Indenture, references to GAAP in the Indenture shall be deemed to mean references United States generally accepted accounting principles.
11. From and after the Effective Time, Sections 2.8(1), 2.8(2), 2.8(3), 2.8(4), 3.2(3), 3.2(4), 3.2(5), 3.2(6) and 4.8 of the Indenture shall be deleted in their entirety and each shall be replaced with the following:
[RESERVED.]
12. From and after the Effective Time, all references in the Indenture to Sections 2.8(1), 2.8(2), 2.8(3), 2.8(4), 3.2(3), 3.2(4), 3.2(5), 3.2(6) and 4.8 of the Indenture shall be removed.
13. From and after the Effective Time, the first sentence of Section 2.9(1) of the Indenture shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
The Corporation may, at its sole option, specify, in a written order of the Corporation delivered to the Warrant Agent, that some or all of the Warrants are to be represented by one or more Global Certificates registered in the name of CDS or its nominee, and in such event the Corporation shall execute and the Warrant Agent shall certify and deliver one or more Global Certificates that shall:
14. From and after the Effective Time, Section 7.1(h) of the Indenture shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
it will use its commercially reasonable best efforts to maintain its status as a reporting issuer not in default of the requirements of the securities laws of the Province of Ontario, provided that this Section 7.1(h) shall not restrict the Corporation from completing a Capital Reorganization in accordance with subsection 5.2(5);
15. From and after the Effective Time, Article 13 of the Indenture shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
ARTICLE 13
FORMS
13.1 Form of Warrant Certificate
The following is the form of Warrant Certificate:
(FORM OF WARRANT CERTIFICATE)
THE WARRANTS EVIDENCED HEREBY ARE EXERCISABLE ON OR BEFORE 5:00 P.M. (TORONTO TIME) ON DECEMBER 9, 2011, AFTER WHICH TIME THE WARRANTS EVIDENCED HEREBY SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE VOID AND OF NO FURTHER FORCE OR EFFECT.
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
NO. |
WARRANTS |
|
CUSIP No. 381119 122
|
COMMON SHARE PURCHASE WARRANTS
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT for value received , the registered holder hereof is entitled for each whole Warrant represented hereby to purchase one fully paid and non-assessable share of common stock ( Common Share ) of Golden Minerals Company (the Corporation ) at a price per share of $18.00 (Canadian) , subject to adjustment as hereinafter described.
Such right to purchase may be exercised by the registered holder hereof at any time on the date of issue hereof up to and including 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on December 9, 2011 (the Time of Expiry ) by surrender of this Warrant Certificate to Computershare Trust Company of Canada (the Warrant Agent ) at the principal transfer office of the Warrant Agent in Montreal, Quebec, together with the subscription form as prescribed in the Indenture (as defined below) and as attached hereto duly executed and completed for the number of Common Shares which the holder hereof is entitled to purchase and the purchase price of such Common Shares as herein provided.
This Warrant Certificate and such payment shall be deemed not to have been surrendered and made except upon personal delivery thereof or, if sent by post or other means of transmission, upon actual receipt thereof by the Warrant Agent at the office specified above.
The purchase price of Common Shares subscribed for hereunder shall be paid by certified cheque, money order or bank draft in lawful money of Canada payable to the order of the Corporation at par in the city where this Warrant Certificate is delivered.
Upon due exercise of the Warrants represented by this Warrant Certificate and payment of the purchase price, the Corporation will issue to the registered holder of this Warrant Certificate, or to a person so specified in the subscription form, the Common Shares so subscribed for. Certificates for the Common Shares subscribed for will be mailed to the persons specified in the subscription form at their respective addresses specified therein or, if so specified in such subscription form, delivered to such
persons at the office where the applicable Warrant Certificate was surrendered, when the transfer registers of the Corporation have been open for three Business Days after the due surrender of such Warrant Certificate and payment as aforesaid. In the event of a purchase of a number of Common Shares fewer than the number which can be purchased pursuant to this Warrant Certificate, the holder shall be entitled to receive without charge a new Warrant Certificate in respect of the balance of such Warrants.
This Warrant Certificate and other Warrant Certificates are issued under and pursuant to a certain warrant indenture dated December 9, 2009 as supplemented by a supplemental indenture dated September 2, 2011 between the Corporation and the Warrant Agent (herein collectively referred to as the Indenture ), to which Indenture and any further instruments supplemental thereto reference is hereby made for a description of the terms and conditions upon which such Warrant Certificates are issued and are to be held, all to the same effect as if the provisions of the Indenture and all instruments supplemental thereto were herein set forth, to all of which provisions the holder of this Warrant Certificate by acceptance hereof assents. The Corporation will furnish to the holder of this Warrant Certificate, upon request and without charge, a copy of the Indenture. In the event of any conflict between the provisions of this Warrant Certificate and the provisions of the Indenture, the provisions of the Indenture will govern.
Subject to the Indenture and to any restriction under applicable law or policy of any applicable regulatory body, the Warrants and Warrants Certificates and the rights thereunder shall only be transferable by the registered holder hereof in compliance with the conditions prescribed in the Indenture and upon the due completion, execution and delivery of a Transfer Form (as attached hereto) in accordance with the terms of the Indenture. THE TRANSFER OF THE WARRANTS EVIDENCED HEREBY MAY BE RESTRICTED BY APPLICABLE SECURITIES LAWS. HOLDERS ARE ADVISED TO CONSULT THEIR LEGAL COUNSEL IN THIS REGARD.
The holding of this Warrant Certificate shall not constitute the holder hereof a holder of Common Shares nor entitle him to any right of interest in respect thereof.
The Indenture provides for adjustment in the number of Common Shares to be delivered upon the exercise of the right of purchase hereby granted and to the Exercise Price in certain events therein set forth.
The Indenture contains provisions making binding upon all holders of Warrants outstanding thereunder resolutions passed at meetings of such holders held in accordance with such provisions by the Warrantholders holding a specified majority of all the then outstanding Warrants.
The holder of this Warrant Certificate may at any time up to and including the Time of Expiry, upon the surrender hereof to the Warrant Agent at its principal transfer office in Montreal, Quebec, and payment of any charges provided for in the Indenture, exchange this Warrant Certificate for other Warrant Certificates representing in the aggregate the same number of Warrants as is expressed in this Warrant Certificate.
This Warrant Certificate shall not be valid for any purpose whatsoever unless and until it has been countersigned by the Warrant Agent for the time being under the Indenture.
Nothing contained herein or in the Indenture shall confer any right upon the holder hereof or any other person to subscribe for or purchase any Common Shares of the Corporation at any time subsequent to the Time of Expiry. After the Time of Expiry, this Warrant Certificate and all rights thereunder shall be void and of no value.
Time is of the essence hereof.
This Warrant Certificate shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the Province of Quebec and the federal laws of Canada applicable therein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Warrant Certificate has been executed on behalf of Golden Minerals Company as of the day of , 20 .
|
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY |
|||
|
|
|
||
|
By: |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
Certified by: |
|||
|
|
|
||
|
COMPUTERSHARE TRUST COMPANY OF CANADA |
|||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
Dated: |
|
|
By: |
|
13.2 Subscription Form
The following is the form of subscription:
SUBSCRIPTION FORM
TO: |
Golden Minerals Company |
|
c/o Computershare Trust Company of Canada |
|
1500 University Street, Suite 700 |
|
Montreal, Quebec H3A 3S8 |
The undersigned registered holder of the within Warrant Certificate, subject to that certain warrant indenture dated December 9, 2009 as supplemented by a supplemental indenture dated September 2, 2011 (herein collectively referred to as the Indenture ) between Golden Minerals Company (the Corporation ) and Computershare Trust Company of Canada , as Warrant Agent, hereby:
(a) subscribes for shares of Common Stock ( Common Shares ) (or such number of Common Shares or other securities or property to which such subscription entitles the undersigned in lieu thereof or in addition thereto under the Indenture) of the Corporation at the price per Common Share of $18.00 (Canadian) (or such adjusted price which may be in effect under the provisions of the Indenture) and in payment of the exercise price encloses a certified cheque, money order or bank draft, in any case in lawful money of Canada payable at par in the City of Montreal, Quebec to the Corporation; and
(b) delivers herewith the above-mentioned Warrant Certificate entitling the undersigned to subscribe for the above-mentioned number of Common Shares.
The undersigned hereby directs that the said Common Shares be registered as follows:
Name(s) in full |
|
Address(es)
|
|
Number(s) of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DATED this day of , 20 .
Signature of Subscriber guaranteed by: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Signature of Subscriber) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Print Name of Subscriber)* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Address of Subscriber in full) |
(*The name of the Subscriber must correspond with the name upon the face of the certificate in every particular and the Corporation reserves the right to require reasonable assurance that such signature is genuine and effective.)
Instructions
1. The registered holder may exercise its right to receive Common Shares by completing this form and surrendering this form and the Warrant Certificate representing the Warrants being exercised along with a certified cheque, money order or bank draft in lawful money of Canada payable to the order of the Corporation at par in an amount equal to the Exercise Price applicable at the time of such surrender in respect of each Common Share which the Warrantholder desires to acquire (being not more than those which the Warrantholder is entitled to acquire pursuant to the Warrants represented by the Warrant Certificate so surrendered) to Computershare Trust Company of Canada, at its principal offices at 1500 University Street, Suite 700, Montreal, Quebec H3A 3S8.
2. The certificates will be mailed by registered mail to the address appearing in this Subscription Form.
3. If Common Shares are issued to a person other than the registered Warrantholder, the signature of the holder must be guaranteed by a Canadian Schedule 1 chartered bank or by a member firm of an acceptable Medallion Signature Guarantee Program (STAMP, SMP, MSP). The stamp must bear the words Signature Medallion Guaranteed .
4. In the United States, signature guarantees must be done by members of a Medallion Signature Guarantee Program only. Signature guarantees are not accepted from Treasury Branches, Credit Unions or Caisses Populaires unless they are members of the Stamp Medallion Program.
5. If the subscription form is signed by a trustee, executor, administrator, curator, guardian, attorney, officer of a corporation or any person acting in a fiduciary or representative capacity, the certificate must be accompanied by evidence of authority to sign satisfactory to the Warrant Agent and the Corporation.
6. The Common Shares issued upon exercise of a Warrant may be subject to resale restrictions in certain jurisdictions, which may never expire, and may be issued with a legend reflecting such restrictions.
7. The Warrants will expire at 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on December 9, 2011 and must be exercised before that time, otherwise the same shall expire and be void and of no value.
13.3 Form of Transfer
The following is the form of transfer:
TRANSFER FORM
FOR value received I/we hereby sell, assign, and transfer unto:
|
|
(Name of Transferee) |
|
|
|
|
|
(Address of Transferee) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Social Insurance Number) |
|
|
|
|
Warrants of |
(Quantity) |
|
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY (the Corporation )
represented by: |
|
(List Certificate Numbers) |
and the undersigned hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints:
|
(Leave Blank) |
the attorney to transfer the said Warrants on the books of the Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.
DATED this day of , 20 .
Signature Guaranteed By:
|
|
|
(Signature of Warrantholder) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Name of Warrantholder, Please Print) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Capacity of Authorized Representative) |
Instructions:
1. The signature on this assignment must correspond with the name as written upon the face of the certificate, in every particular, without alteration or enlargement, or change whatever.
2. The signature must be guaranteed by a Canadian Schedule 1 chartered bank or by a member firm of an acceptable Medallion Signature Guarantee Program (STAMP, SMP, MSP). The stamp must bear the words Signature Medallion Guaranteed.
3. In the United States, signature guarantees must be done by members of a Medallion Signature Guarantee Program only. Signature guarantees are not accepted from Treasury Branches, Credit Unions or Caisses Populaires unless they are members of the Stamp Medallion Program.
16. From and after the Effective Time, the address and contact information of ECU and its counsel, Blake Cassels & Graydon LLP, set forth in Section 14.1(1) of the Indenture shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
If to the Corporation, to:
Golden Minerals Company
350 Indiana Street, Suite 800
Golden, Colorado, 80401
U.S.A.
Attention: Jeffrey G. Clevenger, President
Facsimile: (303) 839-5907
with copies (which shall not constitute notice) to:
Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP
333 Bay Street, Suite 2400
Bay Adelaide Centre, Box 20
Toronto, ON M5H 2T6
Attention: John M. Sabetti
Facsimile: (416) 364 7813
and
Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP
1550 Seventeenth Street, Suite 500
Denver, Colorado 80202
Attention: Deborah Friedman
Facsimile: (303) 893 1379
17. From and after the Effective Time, Schedules A and B to the Indenture shall be deleted in their entirety.
18. In the event that the Arrangement Agreement is terminated without giving effect to the Plan of Arrangement, this Supplemental Warrant Indenture shall terminate and have no further force and effect.
19. Notwithstanding any provision of this Supplemental Warrant Indenture or the Indenture, but subject to Section 10.2 of the Indenture, nothing shall restrict or prevent any amalgamation, merger, sale, consolidation, arrangement, liquidation or winding-up of Golden or restrict or prevent Golden from entering into any other transaction or series of transactions, regardless of any affect which such transaction or transactions may have upon Golden or the Golden Shares. This Section shall not have the effect of reducing or terminating the rights of Warrantholders under the adjustment mechanisms in Article 5 of the Indenture.
20. This Supplemental Warrant Indenture is supplemental to the Indenture and this Supplemental Warrant Indenture shall hereafter be read together and shall have effect as if all provisions thereof and hereof were contained in one instrument. Except as herein amended, the Indenture, as amended, and all the terms and conditions therein shall continue in full force and effect.
21. In the event that there is any inconsistency or a conflict between the provisions of the Indenture and the provisions of this Supplemental Warrant Indenture, the provisions of this Supplemental Warrant Indenture and the intent of the parties as evidenced hereby shall prevail, and such provisions shall be deemed to be amended pursuant to the terms of this Supplemental Warrant Indenture.
22. Each party hereto agrees to execute and deliver all such documents and instruments and do such other acts as may be necessary or advisable to give effect to the terms hereof.
23. This Supplemental Warrant Indenture shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Province of Québec and the laws of Canada applicable therein.
24. This Supplemental Warrant Indenture may be executed and delivered in one or more counterparts each of which when executed and delivered shall be deemed an original but all of which shall be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument.
(Signature page to follow)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF ECU, Golden and the Warrant Agent have executed this Supplemental Warrant Indenture as of the day and year first above written.
ECU SILVER MINING INC. |
|
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY |
||
|
|
|
||
By: |
/s/ Michel Roy |
|
By: |
/s/ Robert P. Vogels |
|
Authorized Signatory |
|
|
Authorized Signatory |
|
|
|
||
COMPUTERSHARE TRUST COMPANY OF CANADA |
|
|
||
|
|
|||
By: |
/s/ Sophie Brault |
|
||
|
Authorized Signatory |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Alessandra Pansera |
|
|
|
|
Authorized Signatory |
|
|
Exhibit 10.2
THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL WARRANT INDENTURE
THIS THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL WARRANT INDENTURE is dated September 2, 2011.
BETWEEN:
ECU SILVER MINING INC , a company governed under the laws of the Province of Québec
( ECU )
AND:
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY , a company incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware
( Golden )
AND:
COMPUTERSHARE TRUST COMPANY OF CANADA , a trust company incorporated under the laws of Canada
(the Warrant Agent )
WHEREAS on February 20, 2009, ECU entered into a warrant indenture as amended and supplemented on March 26, 2009 and May 8, 2009 (collectively, the Indenture ), with the Warrant Agent pursuant to which ECU may issue up to 40,388,576 warrants to purchase common shares in the capital of ECU ( ECU Common Shares ) at a price of $0.95 per ECU Common Share until 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on February 20, 2014 (the Warrants );
AND WHEREAS ECU and Golden have entered into an arrangement agreement dated June 24, 2011 (the Arrangement Agreement ) providing for, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions precedent, ECU and Golden to effect a plan of arrangement (the Plan of Arrangement ) pursuant to which Golden will acquire all of the issued and outstanding ECU Common Shares such that ECU will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Golden;
AND WHEREAS the consideration payable by Golden for each ECU Common Share, other than those ECU Common Shares, if any, in respect of which dissent rights have been duly and validly exercised, and those ECU Common Shares, if any, held by Golden or any of its affiliates, will be 0.05 (the Exchange Ratio ) of a share of common stock in the capital of Golden (a Golden Share ) plus $0.000394;
AND WHEREAS under the terms of the Arrangement Agreement and the Plan of Arrangement and in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Indenture, including, without limitation, Section 10.02 of the Indenture, from and after the effective time of the Plan of Arrangement, as contemplated therein (the Effective Time ), the Warrants held by each
Warrantholder will be exchanged for replacement warrants of Golden ( Golden Warrants ) that represent the right to acquire for the same aggregate consideration that number of Golden Shares that a Warrantholder would have been entitled to acquire in connection with the Plan of Arrangement if, immediately prior to the Effective Time, it had exercised its Warrants and had been the registered holder of the number of ECU Common Shares to which it was theretofor entitled upon exercise of such Warrants;
AND WHEREAS Golden will have the benefit of and be liable for ECUs rights and obligations under the Indenture;
AND WHEREAS the parties are entering into this Third Supplemental Warrant Indenture (the Supplemental Warrant Indenture ) to evidence the rights of the Warrantholders under the terms of the Indenture as a result of the Plan of Arrangement;
NOW THEREFORE THIS SUPPLEMENTAL WARRANT INDENTURE WITNESSES THAT , in consideration of the premises and in further consideration of the mutual covenants herein set forth, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Unless otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms in this Supplemental Warrant Indenture shall have the respective meanings ascribed to such terms in the Indenture.
2. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Indenture, the outstanding Warrants held by each Warrantholder at the Effective Time shall be exchanged for Golden Warrants that represent the right to acquire that number of Golden Shares that a Warrantholder would have been entitled to acquire in connection with the Plan of Arrangement if, immediately prior to the Effective Time, it had exercised its Warrants and had been the registered holder of the number of ECU Common Shares to which it was theretofor entitled upon exercise of the Warrants. Accordingly, as at the Effective Time, the outstanding Warrants held by each Warrantholder will hereby be exchanged for that number of Golden Warrants as is equal to the product of (i) the number of Warrants held by such Warrantholder, multiplied by (ii) the Exchange Ratio; provided however that no fractional Golden Warrants shall be issued to any person such that the number Golden Warrants to be issued to any person pursuant to the Plan of Arrangement shall be rounded up or down, as applicable, to the nearest whole Golden Warrant. For greater certainty, where such fractional interest is greater than or equal to 0.5, the number of Golden Warrants to be issued will be rounded up to the nearest whole number and where such fractional interest is less than 0.5, the number of Golden Warrants to be issued will be rounded down to the nearest whole number. In calculating such fractional interests, all Warrants registered in the name of or beneficially held by a Warrantholder or its nominee shall be aggregated.
3. The exercise price of each Golden Warrant shall be $19.00 (being the Exercise Price of one Warrant divided by the Exchange Ratio).
4. ECU and the Warrant Agent acknowledge and agree that from and after the Effective Time, Golden shall have all of the rights and be subject to all of the obligations of ECU under the Indenture, except as otherwise provided in this Supplemental Warrant Indenture.
5. Golden acknowledges and agrees that from and after the Effective Time, Golden will assume the performance of each and every covenant and obligation contained in the Indenture, as modified by this Supplemental Warrant Indenture, to be performed by ECU.
6. From and after the Effective Time, the parties agree that all references to ECU Silver Mining Inc. in the Indenture shall be read to mean Golden Minerals Company.
7. From and after the Effective Time, the parties agree that all references to Warrants in the Indenture shall be read to mean Golden Warrants as defined herein.
8. From and after the Effective Time, the definitions of Common Shares, Corporation and Exercise Price respectively set forth in Sections 1.01(a), 1.01(e), 1.01(f) and 1.01(n) of the Indenture shall be deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following:
Applicable Legislation means the provisions, if any, of the Delaware General Corporation Law and any statute of Canada or a province thereof, and of the regulations under any such statutes, relating to warrant indentures or to the rights, duties and obligations of trustees and of corporations under warrant indentures, to the extent that such provisions are at the time in force and applicable to this Indenture;
Common Shares means shares of common stock in the capital of the Corporation which the Corporation is authorized to issue, provided that in the event of any adjustment pursuant to the provisions of Article Five hereof, Common Shares shall thereafter mean the shares or other securities or property resulting from such adjustment;
Corporation means Golden Minerals Company and includes any successor corporation thereto;
Exercise Price means $19.00 per Common Share, unless such amount shall have been adjusted pursuant to the provisions of Article Five hereof in which case such term shall mean the adjusted price in effect at the applicable time;
9. From and after the Effective Time, the definitions of Original U.S. Purchaser, Regulation S, Rule 144, United States, U.S. Person and U.S. Securities Act respectively set forth in Sections 1.01(r), 1.01(t), 1.01(w), 1.01(dd), 1.01(ee) and 1.01(ff) of the Indenture shall be deleted in their entirety and each shall be replaced with the following:
[RESERVED.]
10. From and after the Effective Time, Sections 2.01(c), 2.08(h) and 4.01(b) of the Indenture shall be deleted in their entirety and each shall be replaced with the following:
[RESERVED.]
11. From and after the Effective Time, all references in the Indentures to Sections 2.01(c), 2.08(h) and 4.01(b) of the Indenture shall be removed.
12. From and after the Effective Time, Section 2.08(d) of the Indenture shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
Refusal of Registration : The Corporation will be entitled, and may direct the Warrant Agent, to refuse to recognize any transfer, or enter the name of any transferee, of any Warrant on the registers referred to in subsection 2.08(a) hereof, or on any branch registers maintained pursuant to subsection 2.08(g) hereof, if such transfer would constitute a violation of the laws of any jurisdiction or the rules, regulations or policies of any regulatory authority having jurisdiction.
13. From and after the Effective Time, Section 2.08(a) of the Indenture shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
(a) Register : The Corporation will cause to be kept by the Warrant Agent:
(i) at the principal office of the Warrant Agent in Montreal, Quebec, a register of holders in which shall be entered in alphabetical order the names and addresses of the holders of Warrants and particulars of the Warrants held by them; and
(ii) at the principal office of the Warrant Agent in each of Montreal, Quebec and Toronto, Ontario, a register of transfers in which transfers of Warrants and the date and other particulars of each such transfer shall be entered.
14. From and after the Effective Time, Section 7.01(g) of the Indenture shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
the Corporation will, at all times, use commercially reasonable efforts to preserve and maintain its status as a reporting issuer or the equivalent thereof not in default under securities legislation of the Province of Ontario for a period of at least 18 months following the Effective Date;
15. From and after the Effective Time, Schedule A to the Indenture shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
SCHEDULE A
TO THE WARRANT INDENTURE DATED AS OF FEBRUARY 20, 2009, AS SUPPLEMENTED ON MARCH 26, 2009, MAY 8, 2009 AND SEPTEMBER 2, 2011, BETWEEN
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY AND COMPUTERSHARE TRUST COMPANY OF CANADA
FORM OF BILINGUAL WARRANT CERTIFICATE
EXERCISABLE ONLY PRIOR TO 5:00 P.M., TORONTO TIME, ON THE EXPIRY DATE AFTER WHICH TIME THIS WARRANT CERTIFICATE SHALL BE NULL AND VOID .
NUMBER |
|
CERTIFICATE FOR · |
|
|
|
|
|
WARRANTS |
WARRANT
TO PURCHASE COMMON SHARES OF GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT, for value received, · (the holder ) is entitled to subscribe for and to purchase, AT ANY TIME PRIOR TO 5:00 P.M., TORONTO TIME, ON FEBRUARY 20, 2014 (the Expiry Date ), fully paid and non-assessable shares of common stock ( Common Shares ) of Golden Minerals Company (the Corporation ) as constituted on the date hereof, on the basis of one Common Share for each one Warrant, at an exercise price of $19.00 (Canadian) per Common Share, by surrendering this Warrant Certificate to the Warrant Agent specified below with a subscription form (FORM 1) properly completed and executed and a certified cheque, bank draft or money order in lawful money of Canada payable to or to the order of the Corporation for the total purchase price of the Common Shares so subscribed for and purchased.
The holder of this Warrant Certificate may subscribe for and purchase less than the number of Common Shares entitled to be subscribed for and purchased on surrender of this Warrant Certificate. If the subscription does not exhaust the Warrants represented by this Warrant Certificate, a Warrant Certificate representing the balance of the Warrants will be issued to the holder. No Warrant Certificate representing fractional Warrants will be issued and the holder hereof understands and agrees that such holder will not be entitled to any cash payment or other form of compensation in respect of a fractional Warrant. By acceptance hereof, the holder expressly waives any right to receive fractional Common Shares upon exercise hereof. If the number of Common Shares to which the holder would otherwise be entitled upon the exercise of this Warrant Certificate is not a whole number, then the number of Common Shares to be issued will be rounded down to the next whole number.
The principal office of Computershare Trust Company of Canada (the Warrant Agent ) in the City of Montreal, Quebec has been appointed the warrant agent to receive subscriptions for Common Shares and payments from holders of Warrant Certificates. This Warrant Certificate, the subscription form (FORM 1) and a certified cheque, bank draft or money order shall be deemed to be surrendered to the Warrant Agent only upon personal delivery thereof or, if sent by post or other means of transmission, upon receipt thereof by the Warrant Agent at the office specified above. The Corporation may also provide for other places at which this Warrant Certificate may be surrendered for exchange or exercise. If mail is used for delivery of a Warrant Certificate, for the protection of the holder, registered mail should be used and sufficient time should be allowed to avoid the risk of late delivery. Subject to adjustment hereof in the events and in the manner set forth in the Warrant Indenture hereafter mentioned and summarized below, the price payable for each Common Share upon exercise of this Warrant Certificate shall be $19.00 (Canadian).
Certificates representing Common Shares subscribed for and purchased will be mailed to the Persons specified in the subscription form (FORM 1) at the respective addresses specified therein or, if so specified in the subscription form (FORM 1), delivered to such Persons at the office of the Warrant Agent where the applicable Warrant Certificate was surrendered, when the transfer books of the Corporation have been opened, five Business Days after the due surrender of such Warrant Certificate and payment as aforesaid, including any applicable taxes.
This Warrant Certificate may, upon compliance with the reasonable requirements and charges of the Warrant Agent, be divided by completing and executing FORM 2 and delivering the Warrant Certificate to the Warrant Agent.
The Warrants represented by this Warrant Certificate may only be transferred, upon compliance with the conditions prescribed in the Warrant Indenture, on the registers of transfers to be kept at the principal office of the Warrant Agent in Montreal, Quebec or Toronto, Ontario by the holder or his executors, administrators or other legal representatives or his or their attorney duly appointed completing and executing FORM 3, or any other instrument in writing in form and executed in a manner satisfactory to the Warrant Agent, and delivering the Warrant Certificate to the Warrant Agent. Upon compliance with such requirements and such other reasonable requirements as the Warrant Agent may prescribe, such transfer will be duly recorded on the applicable register of transfers by the Warrant Agent. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Corporation will be entitled, and may direct the Warrant Agent, to refuse to record any transfer of any Warrant on such register if such transfer would constitute a violation of the securities laws of any jurisdiction.
This Warrant Certificate represents warrants of the Corporation issued or issuable under the provisions of an indenture dated as of February 20, 2009, as supplemented on March 26, 2009, May 8, 2009 and September 2, 2011, (which indenture together with all other instruments supplemental or ancillary thereto is herein referred to as the Warrant Indenture ), between the Corporation and the Warrant Agent, to which reference is hereby made for particulars of the rights of the holders of the Warrant Certificates, the Corporation and the Warrant Agent in respect thereof and the terms and conditions upon which the Warrants represented hereby are issued and held, all to the same effect as if the provisions of the Warrant Indenture were herein set forth in full, to all of which the holder of this Warrant Certificate by acceptance hereof assents, it being expressly understood that the provisions of the Warrant Indenture and this Warrant Certificate are for the sole benefit of the Corporation, the Warrant Agent and the Warrantholders. Words and terms in this Warrant Certificate with the initial letter or letters capitalized and not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such capitalized words and terms in the Warrant Indenture. A copy of the Warrant Indenture may be obtained on request without charge from the Corporate Secretary of the Corporation, at 350 Indiana Street, Suite 800, Golden, Colorado, 80401 U.S.A., telephone: (303) 839-5060.
Nothing contained in this Warrant Certificate, the Warrant Indenture or otherwise shall be construed as conferring upon the holder hereof any right or interest whatsoever as a holder of Common Shares or other shareholder of the Corporation or any other right or interest except as herein and in the Warrant Indenture expressly provided.
The Warrant Indenture provides for adjustments to the exercise price of the Warrants and to the number and kind of securities purchasable upon exercise upon the happening of certain stated events including the subdivision or consolidation of the Common Shares, certain distributions of Common Shares or securities exchangeable for or convertible into Common Shares or of other assets or property of the Corporation, certain offerings of rights, warrants or options and certain reorganizations. The Warrant Indenture provides for the giving of notice by the Corporation prior to taking certain actions specified therein.
The Corporation may from time to time purchase any of the Warrants by private contract or otherwise. Any such Warrants purchased by the Corporation shall be cancelled.
This Warrant Certificate, the Warrants represented by this Warrant Certificate and the Warrant Indenture shall be governed by and performed, construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the Province of Ontario and the federal laws of Canada applicable therein.
This Warrant Certificate shall not be valid for any purpose until it has been countersigned by or on behalf of the Warrant Agent for the time being under the Warrant Indenture.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Corporation has caused this Warrant Certificate to be signed by its proper officer.
|
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY |
|
|
|
By: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey G. Clevenger, Chief Executive Officer |
This Warrant Certificate is one of the Warrant Certificates referred to in the Warrant Indenture.
Dated:
|
COMPUTERSHARE TRUST COMPANY OF CANADA |
|
|
|
By: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized Officer |
SUBSCRIPTION FORM
(FORM 1)
THE HOLDER HEREBY SUBSCRIBES FOR Common Shares of Golden Minerals Company at $19.00 (Canadian) per Common Share and on the other terms set out in the Warrant Certificate and Warrant Indenture and encloses herewith a certified cheque, bank draft or money order in Canadian dollars payable to Golden Minerals Company in payment of the aggregate subscription price therefor.
The undersigned hereby irrevocably directs that the Common Shares be delivered, subject to the conditions set out in this certificate and the provisions of the Warrant Indenture, and that the said Common Shares be registered as follows:
Name(s) in Full and Social
|
|
Address(es) (include postal
|
|
Number of Common Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL: |
|
|
Please print full name in which certificate(s) are to be issued. If any of the Common Shares are to be issued to a Person or Persons other than the Warrantholder, the Warrantholder must pay to the Warrant Agent all requisite taxes or other government charges, if any.
DATED this day of , 20 .
|
|
|
Signature of Warrantholder |
|
Signature Guaranteed |
Print Name and Address in full below:
Name |
|
|
|
Address |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Include Postal Code) |
o Please check box if certificates representing the Common Shares are to be delivered at the office of the Warrant Agent where this Warrant Certificate is surrendered, failing which the certificates will be mailed to the address set forth above. If the certificates are to be delivered at the office of the Warrant Agent where this Warrant Certificate is surrendered and they are not picked up within five days of their delivery, |
they will be mailed to the last known address of the holder appearing in the registers maintained by the Warrant Agent. |
TO DIVIDE OR COMBINE WARRANT CERTIFICATES
(FORM 2)
Fill in and sign this FORM 2 and surrender this Warrant Certificate to the Warrant Agent in ample time for new Warrant Certificates to be issued and used.
Deliver to the undersigned Warrantholder, at the address mentioned below, new certificates as follows:
Certificate(s) for Warrants each
Certificate(s) for Warrants each
Certificate(s) for Warrants each
Dated this day of , 20 .
|
|
Signature of Warrantholder |
|
Print name and address in full below.
Name |
|
|
|
|
|
Address |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Include Postal Code) |
|
FORM OF TRANSFER
(FORM 3)
FOR VALUE RECEIVED the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers the Warrants represented by this Warrant Certificate to:
Name |
|
|
|
Address |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Include Postal Code) |
|
|
Social Insurance Number(s) |
|
and hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints |
|
|
(leave this space blank) |
as the attorney of the undersigned with full power of substitution to transfer the Warrants on the appropriate register of the Warrant Agent.
DATED this day of , 20 .
|
|
|
Signature Guaranteed |
|
Signature of Transferor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Transferor |
CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO TRANSFERS
1. The Warrant Indenture contains certain other requirements relating to the transfer of Warrants.
2. The signature of the transferor must correspond in every particular with the surname and the first name(s) or initials shown on the face of this certificate and the endorsement must be signature guaranteed, in either case, by a Schedule 1 Canadian chartered bank or a member of a recognized securities transfer agents medallion program (STAMP). The stamp affixed thereon by the guarantor must bear the actual words signature guarantee, or signature medallion guaranteed and otherwise be in accordance with industry standards.
ANNEXE A À LACTE RELATIF AUX BONS
DATÉ DU 20 FÉVRIER 2009, TEL QUE COMPLÉTÉ LES 26 MARS 2009,
8 MAI 2009 ET 2 SEPTEMBRE 2011 INTERVENU ENTRE GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY ET SOCIÉTÉ DE FIDUCIE COMPUTERSHARE DU CANADA
CERTIFICAT DE BONS DE SOUSCRIPTION
LE PRÉSENT CERTIFICAT DE BONS DE SOUSCRIPTION NE PEUT ÊTRE EXERCÉ QUAVANT 17 H, HEURE DE TORONTO, À LA DATE DÉCHÉANCE, APRÈS QUOI IL SERA NUL.
NUMÉRO |
|
CERTIFICAT VISANT · |
|
|
|
|
|
BONS DE SOUSCRIPTION |
BON DE SOUSCRIPTION
VISANT LACHAT DACTIONS ORDINAIRES DE GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
LA PRÉSENTE ATTESTE QUE, pour valeur reçue, · (le « porteur ») a le droit de souscrire et dacheter À TOUT MOMENT AVANT 17 H, HEURE DE TORONTO, LE 20 FÉVRIER 2014 (la « date déchéance »), des actions ordinaires entièrement libérées et non susceptibles dappels subséquents (les « actions ordinaires ») de Golden Minerals Company (la « Société ») telle quelle est constituée à la date des présentes, à raison de une action ordinaire pour chaque bon de souscription, au prix dexercice de 19,00 $ (dollars canadiens) par action ordinaire, en remettant le présent certificat de bons de souscription à lagent pour les bons de souscription mentionné ci-après avec le formulaire de souscription (FORMULAIRE 1) dûment rempli et signé et un chèque certifié, une traite bancaire ou un mandat libellé en monnaie ayant cours légal au Canada payable à la Société, ou à son ordre, pour le prix dachat total des actions ordinaires ainsi souscrites et achetées.
Le porteur du présent certificat de bons de souscription peut souscrire et acheter moins que le nombre dactions ordinaires quil a le droit de souscrire et dacheter à la remise du présent certificat de bons de souscription. Si la souscription ne vise pas tous les bons de souscription représentés par le présent certificat de bons de souscription, un certificat de bons de souscription représentant les bons de souscription restants sera émis au porteur. Aucun certificat de bons de souscription représentant des fractions de bons de souscription ne sera émis et le porteur des présentes comprend et convient quil naura droit à aucun paiement en espèces ni à aucune autre forme de compensation relativement à une fraction de bon de souscription. Par son acceptation des présentes, le porteur renonce expressément au droit de recevoir des fractions dactions ordinaires à lexercice des présentes. Si le nombre dactions ordinaires auquel le porteur aurait par ailleurs droit à lexercice du présent certificat de bons de souscription nest pas un nombre entier, le nombre dactions ordinaires à émettre sera alors arrondi à la baisse au nombre entier le plus près.
Les principaux bureaux de Société de fiducie Computershare du Canada (l« agent pour les bons de souscription ») à Montréal, au Québec, ont été désignés comme lendroit où lagent pour les bons de souscription recevra les souscriptions dactions ordinaires et les paiements des porteurs de certificats de bons de souscription. Le présent certificat de bons de souscription, le formulaire de souscription (FORMULAIRE 1) et le chèque certifié, la traite bancaire ou le mandat seront réputés avoir été remis à lagent pour les bons de souscription uniquement à leur remise en mains propres ou, sils ont
été envoyés par la poste ou par un autre moyen de transmission, à leur réception par lagent pour les bons de souscription aux bureaux indiqués ci-dessus. La Société peut également prévoir dautres endroits où le présent certificat de bons de souscription peut être remis pour son échange ou son exercice. Si la livraison dun certificat de bons de souscription seffectue par la poste, le porteur devrait, pour sa protection, avoir recours au courrier recommandé et prévoir suffisamment de temps pour éviter le risque de livraison tardive. Sous réserve du rajustement des présentes dans les cas et de la manière énoncés dans lacte relatif aux bons de souscription mentionné et résumé ci-après, le prix payable pour chaque action ordinaire à lexercice du présent certificat de bons de souscription sélève à 19,00 $ (dollars canadiens).
Les certificats représentant les actions ordinaires souscrites et achetées seront envoyés par la poste aux personnes nommées sur le formulaire de souscription (FORMULAIRE 1) à leur adresse respective qui y est indiquée ou, si le formulaire de souscription (FORMULAIRE 1) lindique, remis à ces personnes aux bureaux de lagent pour les bons de souscription où le certificat de bons de souscription en cause a été remis, après louverture des registres des transferts de la Société, cinq jours ouvrables après la remise en bonne et due forme du certificat de bons de souscription et du paiement de la manière susmentionnée, y compris les taxes applicables.
Le présent certificat de bons de souscription peut, sous réserve du respect des exigences raisonnables et du paiement des frais raisonnables de lagent pour les bons de souscription, être divisé en remplissant et en signant le FORMULAIRE 2 et en remettant le certificat de bons de souscription à lagent pour les bons de souscription.
Sous réserve du respect des conditions prévues dans lacte relatif aux bons de souscription, les bons de souscription représentés par le présent certificat de bons de souscription ne peuvent être transférés quaux registres des transferts qui seront conservés aux bureaux principaux de lagent pour les bons de souscription à Montréal, au Québec, ou à Toronto, en Ontario, par le porteur, ses liquidateurs, administrateurs ou autres représentants légaux ou son ou leurs fondés de pouvoir dûment nommés en remplissant et en signant le FORMULAIRE 3 ou un autre instrument écrit et signé qui convient à lagent pour les bons de souscription et en remettant le certificat de bons de souscription à lagent pour les bons de souscription. Au respect de ces exigences et des autres exigences raisonnables de lagent pour les bons de souscription, ce dernier inscrira en bonne et due forme le transfert au registre des transferts applicable. Malgré ce qui précède, la Société aura le droit et la possibilité de donner la directive à lagent pour les bons de souscription de refuser dinscrire le transfert dun bon de souscription au registre si le transfert constitue une violation des lois sur les valeurs mobilières dun territoire.
Le présent certificat de bons de souscription représente les bons de souscription de la Société émis ou à émettre aux termes dun acte daté du 20 février 2009, tel que complété les 26 mars 2009, 8 mai 2009 et 2 septembre 2011 (cet acte avec tous autres instruments supplémentaires ou complémentaires étant appelés aux présentes l« acte relatif aux bons de souscription »), intervenu entre la Société et lagent pour les bons de souscription; il faut se reporter à lacte pour obtenir des renseignements détaillés sur les droits des porteurs de certificats de bons de souscription, de la Société et de lagent pour les bons de souscription à légard de ceux-ci et sur les conditions démission et de détention des bons de souscription représentés par les présentes, avec le même effet que si les dispositions de lacte relatif aux bons de souscription étaient énoncées intégralement aux présentes, et le porteur du présent certificat de bons de souscription y consent en acceptant les présentes; il est expressément entendu que les dispositions de lacte relatif aux bons de souscription et du présent certificat de bons de souscription sont stipulées au seul profit de la Société, de lagent pour les bons de souscription et des porteurs des bons de souscription. Les termes et expressions utilisés dans le présent certificat de bons de souscription et qui ny sont pas définis ont le sens qui est attribué à leur équivalent anglais dans lacte relatif aux bons de souscription. On peut obtenir sans frais un exemplaire de lacte relatif aux bons de
souscription sur demande adressée au secrétaire de la Société au 350 Indiana Street, suite 800, Golden, Colorado 80401 USA, téléphone : (303) 839-5060.
Rien dans le présent certificat de bons de souscription, dans lacte relatif aux bons de souscription ou ailleurs ne doit être interprété comme conférant au porteur des présentes un droit ou un intérêt de quelque nature que ce soit en tant que porteur dactions ordinaires ou autre actionnaire de la Société ou un autre droit ou intérêt, sauf comme il est expressément prévu aux présentes et dans lacte relatif aux bons de souscription.
Lacte relatif aux bons de souscription prévoit des rajustements du prix dexercice des bons de souscription ainsi que du nombre et de la nature des titres qui peuvent être achetés à lexercice à la survenance de certains événements désignés, y compris la subdivision ou le regroupement des actions ordinaires, certains placements dactions ordinaires ou de titres échangeables contre des actions ordinaires ou convertibles en actions ordinaires ou dautres actifs ou biens de la Société, certains placements de droits, dautres bons de souscription ou doptions et certaines réorganisations. Lacte relatif aux bons de souscription prévoit quun avis doit être donné à la Société avant de prendre certaines mesures qui y sont énumérées.
La Société peut à loccasion acheter des bons de souscription, notamment de gré à gré. Les bons de souscription que la Société achète ainsi sont annulés.
Le présent certificat de bons de souscription, les bons de souscription représentés par le certificat de bons de souscription et lacte relatif aux bons de souscription sont régis par les lois de la province dOntario et les lois fédérales du Canada qui sy appliquent et sont exécutés et interprétés conformément à celles-ci.
Le présent certificat de bons de souscription nest valide à toute fin que sil est contresigné par ou pour lagent pour les bons de souscription agissant à ce moment aux termes de lacte relatif aux bons de souscription.
EN FOI DE QUOI la Société a fait signer le présent certificat de bons de souscription par son dirigeant compétent.
|
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY |
|
|
|
Par : |
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey G. Clevenger |
|
Chef de la direction |
Le présent certificat de bons de souscription est lun des certificats de bons de souscription dont il est question dans lacte relatif aux bons de souscription.
Date :
|
SOCIÉTÉ DE FIDUCIE
|
|
|
|
Par : |
|
|
|
|
|
Signataire autorisé |
FORMULAIRE DE SOUSCRIPTION
(FORMULAIRE 1)
PAR LES PRÉSENTES LE PORTEUR SOUSCRIT actions ordinaires de Golden Minerals Company à 19,00 $ (dollars canadiens) par action ordinaire et aux autres conditions énoncées dans le certificat de bons de souscription et lacte relatif aux bons de souscription et joint aux présentes un chèque certifié, une traite bancaire ou un mandat libellé en dollars canadiens et payable à « Golden Minerals Company » en paiement du prix de souscription global de celles-ci.
Le soussigné donne irrévocablement par les présentes instruction que les actions ordinaires soient remises, sous réserve des conditions énoncées dans le présent certificat et lacte relatif aux bons de souscription, et quelles soient enregistrées de la manière suivante :
Nom(s) complet(s) et
|
|
Adresse(s) (y compris le code
|
|
Nombre dactions ordinaires |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL : |
|
|
|
Veuillez indiquer en caractères dimprimerie le nom complet de la personne à qui le ou les certificats doivent être émis. Si des actions ordinaires doivent être émises à une personne ou des personnes autres que le porteur du bon de souscription, ce dernier doit payer à lagent pour les bons de souscription tous les impôts et taxes ou autres frais gouvernementaux requis, sil en est.
DATÉ ce jour de 20 .
|
|
|
Signature du porteur du bon de souscription |
|
Signature avalisée |
Nom et adresse complets (en caractères dimprimerie) :
Nom |
|
|
|
Adresse |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(y compris le code postal) |
o Veuillez cocher cette case si les certificats représentant les actions ordinaires doivent être remis aux bureaux de lagent pour les bons de souscription où le présent certificat de bons de souscription est remis, à défaut de quoi les certificats seront envoyés
par la poste à ladresse indiquée ci-dessus. Si les certificats doivent être remis aux bureaux de lagent pour les bons de souscription où le présent certificat de bons de souscription est remis et quils ne sont pas cueillis dans les cinq jours de leur remise, ils seront expédiés par la poste à la dernière adresse connue du porteur figurant dans les registres tenus par lagent pour les bons de souscription.
DIVISION OU REGROUPEMENT DE CERTIFICATS DE BONS DE SOUSCRIPTION
(FORMULAIRE 2)
Remplir et signer le présent FORMULAIRE 2 et remettre le présent certificat de bons de souscription à lagent pour les bons de souscription suffisamment à lavance pour que les nouveaux certificats de bons de souscription soient émis et utilisés.
Remettre au porteur de bon de souscription soussigné, à ladresse indiquée ci-après, les nouveaux certificats de la manière suivante :
certificat(s) pour bons de souscription chacun
certificat(s) pour bons de souscription chacun
certificat(s) pour bons de souscription chacun
DATÉ ce jour de 20 .
|
|
Signature du porteur du bon de souscription |
|
Nom et adresse complets (en caractères dimprimerie) :
Nom |
|
|
|
|
|
Adresse |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(y compris le code postal) |
|
FORMULAIRE DE TRANSFERT
(FORMULAIRE 3)
CONTRE VALEUR REÇUE le soussigné vend, cède et transfère par les présentes les bons de souscription représentés par le présent certificat de bons de souscription à :
Nom |
|
|
|
|
|
Adresse |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(y compris le code postal) |
|
|
|
|
Numéro(s) dassurance sociale |
|
|
|
|
|
et constitue et nomme irrévocablement par les présentes |
|
|
|
(laisser cet espace en blanc) |
|
à titre de fondé de pouvoir du soussigné avec plein pouvoir de substitution pour transférer les bons de souscription au registre approprié de lagent pour les bons de souscription.
DATÉ ce jour de 20 .
|
|
|
Signature avalisée |
|
Signature du cédant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nom du cédant |
CERTAINES EXIGENCES RELATIVES AUX TRANSFERTS
1. Lacte relatif aux bons de souscription contient certaines autres exigences relatives au transfert de bons de souscription.
2. La signature du cédant doit correspondre en tous points au nom de famille et au(x) prénom(s) ou aux initiales paraissant au recto au présent certificat et lendossement doit se faire par signature avalisée, dans chaque cas, par une banque à charte canadienne de lannexe 1 ou un membre dun programme medallion de transfert de titres reconnu (STAMP). Le timbre apposé sur celui-ci par le garant doit porter les termes « aval de signature » ou « signature avalisée par medallion » et doit par ailleurs être conforme aux normes du secteur.
16. From and after the Effective Time, the address and contact information of ECU set forth in Section 15.01(a) of the Indenture shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
to the Corporation at:
350 Indiana Street, Suite 800
Golden, Colorado, 80401
U.S.A.
Attention: Chief Executive Officer
Fax: (303) 839-5907
17. In the event that the Arrangement Agreement is terminated without giving effect to the Plan of Arrangement, this Supplemental Warrant Indenture shall terminate and have no further force and effect.
18. Notwithstanding any provision of this Supplemental Warrant Indenture or the Indenture, but subject to Section 10.02 of the Indenture, nothing shall restrict or prevent any amalgamation, merger, sale, consolidation, arrangement, liquidation or winding-up of Golden or restrict or prevent Golden from entering into any other transaction or series of transactions, regardless of any affect which such transaction or transactions may have upon Golden or the Golden Shares. This Section shall not have the effect of reducing or terminating the rights of Warrantholders under the adjustment mechanisms in Article 5 of the Indenture.
19. This Supplemental Warrant Indenture is supplemental to the Indenture and this Supplemental Warrant Indenture shall hereafter be read together and shall have effect as if all provisions thereof and hereof were contained in one instrument. Except as herein amended, the Indenture, as amended, and all the terms and conditions therein shall continue in full force and effect.
20. In the event that there is any inconsistency or a conflict between the provisions of the Indenture and the provisions of this Supplemental Warrant Indenture, the provisions of this Supplemental Warrant Indenture and the intent of the parties as evidenced hereby shall prevail, and such provisions shall be deemed to be amended pursuant to the terms of this Supplemental Warrant Indenture.
21. Each party hereto agrees to execute and deliver all such documents and instruments and do such other acts as may be necessary or advisable to give effect to the terms hereof.
22. This Supplemental Warrant Indenture shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Province of Ontario and the laws of Canada applicable therein.
23. This Supplemental Warrant Indenture may be executed and delivered in one or more counterparts each of which when executed and delivered shall be deemed an original but all of which shall be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF ECU, Golden and the Warrant Agent have executed this Supplemental Warrant Indenture as of the day and year first above written.
ECU SILVER MINING INC. |
GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Michel Roy |
|
By: |
/s/ Robert P. Vogels |
|
Authorized Signatory |
|
|
Authorized Signatory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPUTERSHARE TRUST COMPANY OF CANADA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Sophie Brault |
|
|
|
|
Authorized Signatory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Alessandra Pansera |
|
|
|
|
Authorized Signatory |
|
|
|
Exhibit 99.1
ECU Silver Mining Inc.
Consolidated Interim Financial Statements (Amended)
June 30, 2011
(unaudited)
Notice to Shareholders of ECU Silver Mining Inc.
In accordance with National Instrument 51-102, Part 4, subsection 4.3 (3) (a), we report that the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared by and are the responsibility of the Companys management. The Companys independent auditor has not performed a review of these interim consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards established by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants for a review of interim financial statements by an entitys auditor.
Michel Roy |
|
Dwight Walker |
|
|
|
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
August 15, 2011 |
|
|
ECU Silver Mining Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Consolidated Interim Statements of Financial Position
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
January 1, |
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2010 |
|
(unaudited, expressed in Canadian dollars) |
|
Notes |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
5 |
|
655,565 |
|
344,826 |
|
7,647,023 |
|
Accounts receivable, advances and deposits |
|
6 |
|
2,050,038 |
|
1,625,482 |
|
1,063,997 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
|
104,737 |
|
37,189 |
|
77,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,810,340 |
|
2,007,497 |
|
8,788,163 |
|
Non current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mining property costs and property, plant and equipment |
|
7 |
|
73,450,475 |
|
72,188,840 |
|
70,399,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
76,260,815 |
|
74,196,337 |
|
79,187,222 |
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
|
7,970,743 |
|
3,600,407 |
|
4,360,474 |
|
Customer advances |
|
8 |
|
4,026,788 |
|
5,017,757 |
|
1,944,350 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
9 |
|
7,341,006 |
|
5,136,522 |
|
4,578,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
19,338,537 |
|
13,754,686 |
|
10,883,425 |
|
Non current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
9 |
|
9,630,351 |
|
13,245,598 |
|
16,511,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
28,968,888 |
|
27,000,284 |
|
27,394,645 |
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital |
|
10,11,12 |
|
149,107,110 |
|
142,362,799 |
|
132,275,566 |
|
Contributed surplus |
|
|
|
26,380,797 |
|
27,290,386 |
|
25,020,424 |
|
Special warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,801,114 |
|
Other reserves |
|
|
|
1,125,970 |
|
396,948 |
|
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
|
(129,321,950 |
) |
(122,854,080 |
) |
(116,304,527 |
) |
|
|
|
|
47,291,927 |
|
47,196,053 |
|
51,792,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
76,260,815 |
|
74,196,337 |
|
79,187,222 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 13 and 14)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements
ECU Silver Mining Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Consolidated Interim Statements of Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
For the three month period |
|
For the six month period |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
ended June 30 |
|
ended June 30 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
(unaudited, expressed in Canadian dollars) |
|
Notes |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administration - Mexico |
|
|
|
1,260,618 |
|
893,437 |
|
2,219,739 |
|
1,834,906 |
|
General and administration - Canada |
|
|
|
711,130 |
|
471,748 |
|
1,056,929 |
|
950,582 |
|
Plan of Arrangement costs |
|
|
|
1,682,901 |
|
|
|
1,682,901 |
|
|
|
Stock based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
184,818 |
|
|
|
531,960 |
|
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
43,383 |
|
24,588 |
|
86,792 |
|
53,910 |
|
Foreign exchange gain |
|
|
|
(110,795 |
) |
904,491 |
|
(685,462 |
) |
102,478 |
|
Inventory write-down |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,587,237 |
|
2,479,082 |
|
4,360,899 |
|
3,615,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss for the period |
|
|
|
3,587,237 |
|
2,479,082 |
|
4,360,899 |
|
3,615,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance income and costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance income |
|
|
|
(343 |
) |
(345 |
) |
(1,621 |
) |
(4,367 |
) |
Finance costs |
|
22 |
|
799,016 |
|
840,985 |
|
2,108,592 |
|
1,623,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
798,673 |
|
840,640 |
|
2,106,971 |
|
1,619,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss for the period |
|
|
|
4,385,910 |
|
3,319,722 |
|
6,467,870 |
|
5,235,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss (income) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation reserve |
|
|
|
131,435 |
|
(88,885 |
) |
(729,022 |
) |
(2,280,364 |
) |
Comprehensive loss for the period |
|
|
|
4,517,345 |
|
3,230,837 |
|
5,738,848 |
|
2,954,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share |
|
15 |
|
(0.014 |
) |
(0.011 |
) |
(0.021 |
) |
(0.017 |
) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements
ECU Silver Mining Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Consolidated Interim Statements of Changes in Equity
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
|
|
|
|
Share Capital |
|
Contributed |
|
Special |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Amount |
|
Surplus |
|
Warrants |
|
Reserves |
|
Deficit |
|
Total |
|
(unaudited, expressed in Canadian dollars) |
|
Notes |
|
shares |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
308,236,733 |
|
142,362,799 |
|
27,290,386 |
|
|
|
396,948 |
|
(122,854,080 |
) |
47,196,053 |
|
Loss for period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,467,870 |
) |
(6,467,870 |
) |
Translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
729,022 |
|
|
|
729,022 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued in private placement |
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
2,600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,600,000 |
|
Shares issued on exercise of options |
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
472,930 |
|
(167,930 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
305,000 |
|
Shares issued on exercise of warrants |
|
|
|
4,494,600 |
|
3,678,308 |
|
(741,659 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,936,649 |
|
Share issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
(6,927 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,927 |
) |
Balance June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
317,081,333 |
|
149,107,110 |
|
26,380,797 |
|
|
|
1,125,970 |
|
(129,321,950 |
) |
47,291,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
290,340,733 |
|
132,275,566 |
|
25,020,424 |
|
10,801,114 |
|
|
|
(116,304,527 |
) |
51,792,577 |
|
Loss for period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,235,158 |
) |
(5,235,158 |
) |
Translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,280,364 |
|
|
|
2,280,364 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
589,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
589,568 |
|
Deemed exercise of Special Warrants: |
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued |
|
|
|
16,946,000 |
|
10,421,790 |
|
|
|
(10,421,790 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,779,330 |
|
(1,779,330 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
(1,400,006 |
) |
|
|
1,400,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
307,286,733 |
|
141,297,350 |
|
27,389,322 |
|
|
|
2,280,364 |
|
(121,539,685 |
) |
49,427,351 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements
ECU Silver Mining Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Consolidated Interim Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
For the three month period |
|
For the six month period |
|
||||
|
|
ended June 30 |
|
ended June 30 |
|
||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
(unaudited, expressed in Canadian dollars) |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Loss for the period |
|
(3,587,237 |
) |
(2,479,082 |
) |
(4,360,899 |
) |
(3,615,774 |
) |
Items not affecting cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment |
|
43,383 |
|
24,588 |
|
86,792 |
|
53,910 |
|
Stock based compensation |
|
|
|
184,818 |
|
|
|
531,960 |
|
Unrealized foreign exchange (gain) loss |
|
211,438 |
|
1,075,829 |
|
(254,722 |
) |
355,041 |
|
Accretion interest |
|
62,586 |
|
134,697 |
|
141,807 |
|
282,207 |
|
Gain on disposal of capital asset |
|
(8,300 |
) |
(5,100 |
) |
(10,666 |
) |
(5,100 |
) |
Changes in non cash working capital items |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
(622,586 |
) |
(1,033,340 |
) |
(424,556 |
) |
(2,273,490 |
) |
Prepaid expenses |
|
10,741 |
|
(9,177 |
) |
(67,548 |
) |
(50,745 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
2,827,704 |
|
353,700 |
|
4,370,336 |
|
(227,253 |
) |
Customer advances |
|
415,028 |
|
1,168,896 |
|
(990,969 |
) |
1,260,096 |
|
Cash used in operating activities |
|
(647,243 |
) |
(584,171 |
) |
(1,510,425 |
) |
(3,689,148 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTMENT ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from property development |
|
4,125,261 |
|
4,425,413 |
|
10,121,353 |
|
7,611,679 |
|
Mining property exploration and development costs |
|
(5,691,393 |
) |
(3,855,624 |
) |
(10,075,001 |
) |
(7,689,528 |
) |
Mining property acquisition costs |
|
(1,358,059 |
) |
(1,165,800 |
) |
(1,506,502 |
) |
(1,165,800 |
) |
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |
|
(241,846 |
) |
(454,374 |
) |
(427,005 |
) |
(675,571 |
) |
Finance income received |
|
343 |
|
345 |
|
1,621 |
|
4,367 |
|
Cash used in investing activities |
|
(3,165,694 |
) |
(1,050,040 |
) |
(1,885,534 |
) |
(1,914,853 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares and warrants issued for cash, net |
|
2,596,583 |
|
|
|
2,596,583 |
|
|
|
Shares issued on exercise of options and warrants, net |
|
1,460,162 |
|
|
|
3,238,139 |
|
|
|
Decrease in long term debt |
|
(4,295 |
) |
(3,895 |
) |
(8,487 |
) |
(7,697 |
) |
Finance costs paid |
|
(799,016 |
) |
(840,985 |
) |
(2,108,592 |
) |
(1,623,751 |
) |
Cash generated by financing activities |
|
3,253,434 |
|
(844,880 |
) |
3,717,643 |
|
(1,631,448 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
(4,866 |
) |
(13,494 |
) |
(10,945 |
) |
(6,158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) in cash and cash equivalents during the period |
|
(564,369 |
) |
(2,492,585 |
) |
310,739 |
|
(7,241,607 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
1,219,934 |
|
2,898,001 |
|
344,826 |
|
7,647,023 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
655,565 |
|
405,416 |
|
655,565 |
|
405,416 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements
ECU Silver Mining Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(unaudited, expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
1. Nature of Activities
ECU Silver Mining Inc. was incorporated in the province of Quebec, Canada and its shares are publicly traded. The Companys registered office is 1116 Avenue Granada, Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec, Canada and its executive office is located at 87 Front Street East, 2nd Floor, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of mining properties in Mexico that are mainly gold-bearing and silver-bearing. The Company has earned revenues from its exploration and development activities and is considered to be in the development stage. It has not yet determined whether a sufficient proportion of its mineral resources are economically exploitable and, accordingly, has not yet determined whether the mining properties contain economic mineral reserves.
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes that the Company will, in the ordinary course of business, be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities. The recoverability of the accumulated costs shown for mining properties and related deferred costs is dependent upon the existence of economically recoverable reserves, future profitable production, and on the Companys ability to obtain the necessary financing to fund its operations.
2. Basis of Preparation
a) Statement of Compliance
The unaudited consolidated interim financial statements (interim financial statements) of ECU Silver Mining Inc. and all its subsidiaries (together referred to as ECU or the Company) for the six months ended June 30, 2011 have been prepared in accordance with IAS 34, Interim Financial Reporting, using accounting policies consistent with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and interpretations of the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRIC). The consolidated interim financial statements do not include all of the information required for full annual consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, certain information and disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), have been omitted or condensed.
The significant accounting policies applied in these consolidated interim financial statements are presented in note 3 and are based on IFRS in effect as of August 15, 2011. Any changes to IFRS that will impact the annual consolidated financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2011 could result in a restatement of these consolidated interim financial statements.
An explanation of how the transition to IFRS has affected the reported financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the Company is provided in note 23. This note includes reconciliations of equity, net earnings and total comprehensive income for the 2010 comparative periods, and of equity at the date of transition reported under previous Canadian generally accepted accounting principles to those reported under IFRS for those periods and at the date of transition.
ECU Silver Mining Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(unaudited, expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
b) Basis of Measurement
The consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared on a historical cost basis, except for the following, which are measured at fair value:
· derivative financial instruments
· financial instruments at fair value through profit and loss
· available-for-sale assets
The methods used to measure fair values are discussed further in note 3 l.
c) Basis of Consolidation
Subsidiaries related to significant properties of the Company are accounted for as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting |
Name |
|
Location |
|
Ownership |
|
Method |
BLM Minera Mexicana S.A de C.V. |
|
Mexico |
|
100% |
|
Consolidated |
Minera William S.A de C.V. |
|
Mexico |
|
100% |
|
Consolidated |
Minera Labri S.A. de C.V. |
|
Mexico |
|
100% |
|
Consolidated |
The consolidated financial statements also included the Companys share of the income, expenses, assets and liabilities of the San Diego Joint Venture which involves jointly controlled exploration assets.
All inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated.
3. Significant Accounting Policies
a) Presentation currency
The consolidated interim financial statements are presented in Canadian dollars which is the functional currency of ECU Silver Mining Inc. The functional currency of the Mexican subsidiaries is the Mexican peso. These consolidated interim financial statements have been translated to the Canadian dollar in accordance with IAS 21 The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates. These guidelines require that assets and liabilities be translated using the exchange rate at period end, and income, expenses and cash flow items are translated using the rate that approximates the exchange rates at the dates of the transactions (i.e. the average rate for the period). Subsequent to the adoption of IFRS, all resulting exchange differences are recorded in the foreign currency translation reserve.
b) Foreign currency transactions
Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at reporting period exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognized in profit or loss. Non-monetary assets are translated at historical exchange rates.
ECU Silver Mining Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(unaudited, expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
c) Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period.
Significant accounts that require estimates as the basis for determining the stated amounts include, but are not limited to, the accounting for accounts receivable and doubtful accounts, estimating the net realizable value of inventory, asset impairment, accounting for share-based payments, revenue recognition, calculation of depreciation, anticipated costs of asset retirement obligations and the valuation of deferred income tax assets and liabilities, mining interests and deferred expenditures. While management believes that these estimates and assumptions are reasonable, actual results could vary significantly.
In determining these estimates, the Company relies on assumptions regarding applicable industry performance and prospects, as well as general business and economic conditions that prevail and are expected to prevail. These assumptions are limited by the availability of reliable comparable data and the uncertainty of predictions concerning future events.
d) Revenue recognition
Revenue is recognized upon delivery when title and risk of ownership of metal and metal bearing concentrates passes to the buyer and when collection is reasonably assured. The contained metal in the concentrates shipped is assayed and the appropriate negotiated amount of recoverable metal contained therein is recorded as revenue based on the then current market rate of the metals. The concentrates are sold under contracts that provide for final prices to be determined by quoted market prices in a period subsequent to the date of the sale. Variations from the provisionally priced sales are recognized as revenue adjustments in the period they occur.
The Company has continued with the accounting practice under Canadian GAAP that, as the Company is in the development stage, all revenues are offset against mining properties and deferred exploration costs.
e) Cash and cash equivalents
The Companys policy is to present cash and temporary investments having a term of three months or less from the acquisition date within cash and cash equivalents.
f) Mining Properties, and Deferred Exploration and Development Expenses
The amounts recorded as mining properties and deferred exploration costs represent exploration, development and associated operating costs incurred to date and are not intended to reflect present or future values. These costs are deferred until the discovery of economically exploitable reserves and the start-up of the production phase on a property-by-property basis or until the property is abandoned. Mining properties are abandoned when management allows property interests to lapse or when they determine that properties are not economically viable. Costs accumulated relating to projects that are abandoned are written-off in the year in which a decision to discontinue the project is made.
ECU Silver Mining Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(unaudited, expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
When it has been determined that a mining property can be economically developed as a result of establishing proven and probable reserves, costs incurred prospectively to develop the property are capitalized as incurred and are amortized using the units-of-production method over the estimated life of the ore body based upon recoverable ounces to be mined from estimated proven and probable reserves.
The Company is in the development stage and by definition commercial production has not yet commenced. Commercial production occurs when an asset or property is substantially complete, is fully permitted and ready for its intended use. No amortization of mining properties has been charged in these financial statements.
Where there is an indication that impairment may exist, senior management reviews the carrying values of mining properties and deferred exploration expenditures with a view to assessing whether there has been any impairment in value. In the event that it is determined there is an impairment in the carrying value of any property, the carrying value will be written down or written off, as appropriate. There was no impairment write-down required at June 30, 2011.
Supplies and spare parts are valued at the lower of average cost and replacement cost.
g) Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment provisions. Depreciation is provided for plant and equipment on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets and deferred to mining properties or charged to expense as appropriate. Depreciation is charged separately for each significant part of an item of property, plant and equipment. The following estimated useful lives are being used:
Buildings |
|
20 years |
Leasehold improvements |
|
2 or 8 years |
Automotive |
|
4 years |
Machinery and equipment |
|
10 years |
Computer equipment |
|
3 1/3 years |
Office equipment |
|
10 years |
The estimated useful lives, depreciation method and residuals are reviewed at each reporting date.
h) Asset retirement obligations
The Company records the present value of its legal obligations associated with the asset retirement when the liability is incurred. The corresponding amount is capitalized as part of the related mining propertys carrying value. While the associated mining property is in the pre-production stage, the liability is accreted over time through periodic charges to mining property costs. In each subsequent period, the carrying amounts of the asset and the liability are adjusted for changes to the Company`s estimate of future cash flows associated with the retirement obligations.
Management estimates that the current present value of legal obligations for asset retirement is de minimis.
ECU Silver Mining Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(unaudited, expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
i) Income and Mining Taxes
The Company uses the liability method to account for income taxes. Under this method deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured by using enacted or substantively enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years during which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Deferred tax asset is only recognized if it can be demonstrated that there will be taxable profits in future years to utilize the deductible temporary differences and unused tax losses. The effect on future tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
j) Basic and Diluted Loss per Share
The basic loss per share is calculated using the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. We follow the treasury stock method in calculating diluted earnings per share. Under this method, the weighted average number of shares includes the potentially dilutive effects of the conversion of in-the-money stock options and warrants into common shares. The effect of potential issuances of shares under options and warrants would be anti-dilutive when a loss is reported, and therefore basic and diluted losses per share are the same.
k) Stock-based compensation
Stock options granted to employees and non-employees are accounted for using the fair value method. Under this method, the compensation cost is measured as at the date of the grant by applying the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The determined fair value is recognized as a cost over the vesting period with a corresponding increase to contributed surplus. Those costs which relate to employees engaged in exploration and development of mining properties, are capitalized to deferred mining property costs. On the exercise of stock options, consideration paid and the associated contributed surplus amount is transferred to common shares.
l) Financial Instruments
All financial assets are classified as either at fair value through profit or loss or amortized cost. Financial assets must be designated as at fair value through profit or loss except for financial assets classified at amortized cost if the objective is to collect contractual cash flows made up of principal and interest payments which are paid at a specified date. Cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable are designated as amortized cost. All financial liabilities are designated at amortized cost unless the Company on initial recognition has classified the liability at fair value. All financial derivatives including embedded derivatives are classified as at fair value through profit or loss unless the financial derivative meets the criteria of an equity instrument. All financial assets and liabilities designated as amortized cost use the effective interest method. Impairment provisions are made if and only if there is objective evidence that the financial asset is impaired.
Transaction costs such as arrangement and advance fees charged by the Companys principal lender in connection with long term debt are expensed at the time they are incurred.
ECU Silver Mining Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(unaudited, expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
Fair value hierarchy:
Financial instruments recorded at fair value are classified using a fair value hierarchy that reflects the significance of the inputs used in making the measurements. The fair value hierarchy has the following levels:
Level 1 reflects valuation based on quoted prices observed in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 reflects valuation techniques based on inputs that are quoted prices of similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices used in a valuation model that are observable for that instrument; and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
Level 3 reflects valuation techniques with significant unobservable market inputs.
A financial instrument is classified to the lowest level of the hierarchy for which a significant input has been considered in measuring fair value. The financial instruments in the Companys financial statements, measured at fair value, are the cash and cash equivalents.
m) Financial derivatives - warrants
A financial derivative such as a warrant which will be settled with the Companys own equity instruments will be designated as an equity instrument if the derivative has no contractual obligation and is to acquire a fixed number of the entitys own equity instruments for a fixed amount of Canadian dollars. A warrant will be considered as a financial liability at fair value through profit or loss if it is to acquire either a variable number of equity instruments or consideration. However, if the warrant is for a fixed number of equity instruments but the exercise is in a currency other than the functional currency the warrant will be a financial liability unless the warrants were offered pro rata to all of its existing owners of the same class of its own non-derivative equity instruments.
n) Financial derivatives - embedded derivatives
Certain derivatives embedded in other financial instruments are treated as separate derivatives when their economic characteristics and risks are not closely related to those of the host contract and the host contract is not carried at fair value through profit or loss. These embedded derivatives are separately accounted for at fair value, with changes in fair value recognised in profit or loss.
o) Impairment of non-financial assets
The Companys non-financial assets include mining properties and property, plant and equipment. The assets are reviewed for impairment on an annual basis or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized in profit or loss when the assets carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of an assets fair value less costs to sell and value in use. Where an individual asset cannot be assessed for impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash flows (cash-generating units). Non-financial assets that suffered an impairment loss are reviewed for possible reversal of the impairment at each reporting date and any reversals are recognized in profit or loss.
ECU Silver Mining Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(unaudited, expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
4. Recent accounting pronouncements
Certain pronouncements have been issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) or the International Financial Reporting Interpretation Committee (IFRIC) that are mandatory for accounting periods after December 31, 2010. Many are not applicable or do not have a significant impact to the Corporation and have been excluded from the discussion below.
a) New standards, amendments and interpretations issued effective for the financial year beginning January 1, 2011
Revised IAS 24 (revised), Related party disclosures, was issued in November 2009 and supersedes IAS 24, Related party disclosures, issued in 2003. IAS 24 (revised) is mandatory for periods beginning on or after 1 January 2011. The revised standard clarifies and simplifies the definition of a related party.
Classification of rights issues (amendment to IAS 32), issued in October 2009. The amendment addresses the accounting for rights issues, warrants and options that are denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the issuer. Provided certain conditions are met, such rights issues are now classified as equity regardless of the currency in which the exercise price is denominated. The Company will apply the amended standard from January 1, 2011 where applicable. It is not expected to have any impact on the Companys financial statements.
IFRIC 19, Extinguishing financial liabilities with equity instruments, effective July 1, 2010. The interpretation clarifies the accounting by an entity when the terms of a financial liability are renegotiated and result in the entity issuing equity instruments to a creditor of the entity to extinguish all or part of the financial liability (debt for equity swap). It requires a gain or loss to be recognised in profit or loss, which is measured as the difference between the carrying amount of the financial liability and the fair value of the equity instruments issued. It is not expected to have any impact on the Companys financial statements.
b) New standards, amendments and interpretations issued effective for the financial year beginning January 1, 2013 but early adopted by the Company
IFRS 9, Financial instruments, issued in November 2009 and amended in October 2010. This standard is the first step in the process to replace IAS 39, Financial instruments: recognition and measurement. IFRS 9 introduces new requirements for classifying and measuring financial assets and financial liabilities. The standard is not applicable until January 1, 2013 but the Company is early adopting as the profile of the Companys financial assets and financial liabilities would be more appropriately classified under IFRS 9 rather than IAS 39.
ECU Silver Mining Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(unaudited, expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
5. Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
January 1, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2010 |
|
Cash at bank |
|
655,565 |
|
344,826 |
|
3,647,023 |
|
Term deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
655,565 |
|
344,826 |
|
7,647,023 |
|
6. Accounts receivable, advances and deposits
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
January 1, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2010 |
|
Trade receivables |
|
510,030 |
|
357,320 |
|
125,171 |
|
Value added taxes recoverable |
|
1,281,809 |
|
1,077,878 |
|
661,311 |
|
Expenses recoverable from Joint Venture partner |
|
5,910 |
|
2,372 |
|
165,320 |
|
Deposits and advances |
|
252,289 |
|
187,912 |
|
112,195 |
|
|
|
2,050,038 |
|
1,625,482 |
|
1,063,997 |
|
None of the balances are considered impaired.
ECU Silver Mining Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(unaudited, expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
7. Mining property costs and property, plant and equipment
|
|
Mining property costs |
|
Supplies and |
|
Property, plant |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Velardeña |
|
Chicago |
|
San Diego |
|
Nazas |
|
Flechas |
|
spare parts |
|
and equipment |
|
Total |
|
Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1, 2010 |
|
49,774,885 |
|
2,896,067 |
|
981,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
524,411 |
|
20,998,571 |
|
75,175,709 |
|
Acquisition costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
959,091 |
|
1,114,528 |
|
Disposal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,582 |
) |
(18,582 |
) |
Revenues |
|
(16,246,560 |
) |
(3,099,126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,345,686 |
) |
Exploration and development costs |
|
14,357,446 |
|
2,296,239 |
|
9,506 |
|
171,853 |
|
726,847 |
|
76,526 |
|
|
|
17,638,417 |
|
Depreciation capitalized |
|
1,855,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,855,701 |
|
Stock based compensation |
|
83,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,137 |
|
Reversal of inventory write-down |
|
2,045,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,045,613 |
|
Foreign exchange movement |
|
293,637 |
|
(3,875 |
) |
4,926 |
|
(6,160 |
) |
|
|
3,350 |
|
103,202 |
|
395,080 |
|
Balance December 31, 2010 |
|
52,163,859 |
|
2,089,305 |
|
996,207 |
|
321,130 |
|
726,847 |
|
604,287 |
|
22,042,282 |
|
78,943,917 |
|
Acquisition costs |
|
|
|
292,823 |
|
|
|
47,879 |
|
|
|
(47,364 |
) |
427,005 |
|
720,343 |
|
Disposal / Write-off |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(260,519 |
) |
(260,519 |
) |
Revenues |
|
(10,121,353 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,121,353 |
) |
Exploration and development costs |
|
8,624,281 |
|
870,272 |
|
453,599 |
|
79,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,027,637 |
|
Depreciation capitalized |
|
915,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
915,917 |
|
Foreign exchange movement |
|
533,324 |
|
11,798 |
|
4,880 |
|
1,630 |
|
7,576 |
|
6,324 |
|
223,703 |
|
789,235 |
|
Balance June 30, 2011 |
|
52,116,028 |
|
3,264,198 |
|
1,454,686 |
|
450,124 |
|
734,423 |
|
563,247 |
|
22,432,471 |
|
81,015,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,776,650 |
|
4,776,650 |
|
Depreciation for the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,988,654 |
|
1,988,654 |
|
Disposition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,502 |
) |
(13,502 |
) |
Foreign exchange movement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,275 |
|
3,275 |
|
Balance December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,755,077 |
|
6,755,077 |
|
Depreciation for the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,002,709 |
|
1,002,709 |
|
Disposition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(252,617 |
) |
(252,617 |
) |
Foreign exchange movement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,533 |
|
59,533 |
|
Balance June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,564,702 |
|
7,564,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net book value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at January 1, 2010 |
|
49,774,885 |
|
2,896,067 |
|
981,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
524,411 |
|
16,221,921 |
|
70,399,059 |
|
at December 31, 2010 |
|
52,163,859 |
|
2,089,305 |
|
996,207 |
|
321,130 |
|
726,847 |
|
604,287 |
|
15,287,205 |
|
72,188,840 |
|
at June 30, 2011 |
|
52,116,028 |
|
3,264,198 |
|
1,454,686 |
|
450,124 |
|
734,423 |
|
563,247 |
|
14,867,769 |
|
73,450,475 |
|
ECU Silver Mining Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(unaudited, expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
8. Customer advances
The Company has made arrangements with the customer of its doré bars to provide financing in the form of advances prior to product delivery. The advances are denominated in US dollars and interest is charged at the rate of 18% per annum on outstanding balances. Both advance amounts and interest are settled at the time of sales invoice payment.
9. Long-term debt
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
January 1, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2010 |
|
Term loan |
|
16,028,583 |
|
16,528,801 |
|
17,466,087 |
|
less current portion |
|
(6,411,433 |
) |
(3,305,760 |
) |
(2,911,015 |
) |
|
|
9,617,150 |
|
13,223,041 |
|
14,555,072 |
|
Mineral concession liability |
|
911,306 |
|
1,813,364 |
|
3,567,999 |
|
less current portion |
|
(911,306 |
) |
(1,813,364 |
) |
(1,651,806 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,916,193 |
|
Facilities loan |
|
31,468 |
|
39,955 |
|
55,735 |
|
less current portion |
|
(18,267 |
) |
(17,398 |
) |
(15,780 |
) |
|
|
13,201 |
|
22,557 |
|
39,955 |
|
|
|
9,630,351 |
|
13,245,598 |
|
16,511,220 |
|
Term loan
As at period end the Company owed $16,028,583 ($16,618,541 US dollars) on its term loan. The facility was restructured during the period. Principal repayments under the amended facility are payable in thirty equal monthly payments commencing July 31, 2011 and ending December 31, 2013. The terms of interest payable under the restructured facility were unchanged being payable quarterly and calculated at the greater of 12% and 1-month London Interbank Offered Rate plus 6%. The effective rate of interest on the loan is 12.8% . The loan is secured by a first mortgage covering certain of the current mining properties of the Companys Mexican subsidiaries, as well as the current and future facilities constructed thereon.
Mineral concession liability
|
|
Amount $ |
|
Balance - December 31, 2010 |
|
1,813,364 |
|
Accretion interest |
|
141,807 |
|
Payments |
|
(1,165,800 |
) |
Unrealized translation gain |
|
121,935 |
|
Balance - June 30, 2011 |
|
911,306 |
|
ECU Silver Mining Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(unaudited, expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
The Company previously entered into contracts which terminated the legal actions related to title of four mineral concessions on the Velardeña property and settled the title matter. Under the terms of the contracts, the Company agreed to pay a total of $6,000,000 US dollars in a series of 6 payments of $1,000,000 US dollars, commencing May 19, 2009 and running semi-annually thereafter ending November 17, 2011, without interest. Under the terms of the contracts, a 30% interest in the title to the concessions will transfer to the counterparty should the Company fail to make the payments agreed there under.
The fair value of the debt at initial recognition was estimated using the discounted cash flow method. The debt is being accreted over the expected life of 2 1/2 years using the effective interest method at a rate of 15.5%.
Facilities loan
This loan carries interest at 10% and is repayable over a 5 year term in monthly payments of principal and interest of $1,698 and matures February 2013.
10. Share capital
The Companys authorized share capital consists of an unlimited number of common shares without par value.
During the period, the Company completed a private placement of 4,000,000 common shares at $0.65 per common share for gross proceeds of $2,600,000.
In 2009, the Company completed an offering of 16,946,000 special warrants (the Special Warrants) to subscribers on a private placement basis at a price of $0.72 per Special Warrant for a total gross proceeds of $12,201,120. The net proceeds of the issue of $10,801,114 were reflected in a separate category in Shareholders Equity at January 1, 2010.
Effective January 27, 2010, following receipt of a short form prospectus filing, all the outstanding Special Warrants were deemed to be exercised, resulting in the issuance of 16,946,000 units (the Unit). Each Unit was comprised of one common share in the share capital of the Company and one-half of one warrant to purchase a common share in the share capital of the Company (each whole warrant, a Purchase Warrant). Each Purchase Warrant entitles the holder thereof to purchase one common share in the share capital of the Company at an exercise price of $0.90 per Purchase Warrant at any time before December 9, 2011. The gross proceeds of the Special Warrant offering were assigned on deemed conversion $10,421,790 to common shares and $1,779,330 to warrants. The fair value of the warrants was estimated on the date of the private placement based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate 1.0%, expected life 2 years, expected volatility 65%, and expected dividend yield 0%. The costs of the private placement issue have been reflected as share issuance costs.
ECU Silver Mining Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(unaudited, expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
11. Stock Options
Under the terms of the Companys stock option plan (the Plan) 14,252,398 Common Shares have been reserved for issuance. Options under the Plan are permitted to be granted to directors, officers, employees and consultants of the Company, provided that the maximum number of Common Shares which may be reserved for issuance to any one beneficiary in any 12 month period may not exceed 5% of the number of Common Shares then issued and outstanding or 2% in the case of a beneficiary who is conducting investor relations activities. The exercise price of options granted under the Plan is not permitted to be less than the closing price of the Common Shares on the day preceding the grant of the options, less any discount allowed by applicable securities legislation. Options granted pursuant to the Plan will have an exercise period of no more than 10 years, or such lesser period as may be permitted by applicable securities legislation.
A summary of changes in common stock options outstanding is presented below:
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Year ended |
|
||||
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
exercise |
|
|
|
exercise |
|
|
|
Number |
|
price ($) |
|
Number |
|
price ($) |
|
Options outstanding, beginning of year |
|
15,365,000 |
|
1.86 |
|
15,740,000 |
|
1.83 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
0.80 |
|
Exercised |
|
(350,000 |
) |
0.87 |
|
(300,000 |
) |
0.80 |
|
Cancelled |
|
(1,780,000 |
) |
1.00 |
|
(175,000 |
) |
0.71 |
|
Options outstanding, end of period |
|
13,235,000 |
|
2.00 |
|
15,365,000 |
|
1.86 |
|
Options exercisable, end of period |
|
13,235,000 |
|
2.00 |
|
15,365,000 |
|
1.86 |
|
The exercise price of the options granted was greater than the market price at the date of grant.
The following table summarizes information about the common stock options outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Number of |
|
remaining |
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
options |
|
options |
|
contractual |
|
Expiry Date |
|
price ($) |
|
outstanding |
|
exercisable |
|
life (years) |
|
September 23, 2011 |
|
1.59 |
|
600,000 |
|
600,000 |
|
0.2 |
|
December 21, 2011 |
|
3.00 |
|
2,000,000 |
|
2,000,000 |
|
0.5 |
|
October 10, 2012 |
|
2.40 |
|
5,115,000 |
|
5,115,000 |
|
1.3 |
|
November 19, 2012 |
|
2.40 |
|
150,000 |
|
150,000 |
|
1.4 |
|
July 25, 2013 |
|
1.70 |
|
2,850,000 |
|
2,850,000 |
|
2.1 |
|
October 22, 2014 |
|
0.80 |
|
2,520,000 |
|
2,520,000 |
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
2.00 |
|
13,235,000 |
|
13,235,000 |
|
1.7 |
|
ECU Silver Mining Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(unaudited, expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
No stock options were granted during the six month period ended June 30, 2011. The amount recorded for share-based compensation was as follows:
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Share based compensation in mining property costs |
|
|
|
26,397 |
|
|
|
57,608 |
|
Share based compensation in administrative expenses |
|
|
|
184,818 |
|
|
|
531,960 |
|
Total share-based compensation |
|
|
|
211,215 |
|
|
|
589,568 |
|
Option pricing models including the Black-Scholes model require the input of highly subjective assumptions that can materially affect the fair value estimate and therefore do not necessarily provide a reliable measure of the fair value of the Companys stock options.
12. Warrants
Changes during the period in share purchase warrants issued are as follows:
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Year ended |
|
||||
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
exercise |
|
|
|
exercise |
|
|
|
Number |
|
price ($) |
|
Number |
|
price ($) |
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
50,310,426 |
|
0.92 |
|
42,487,426 |
|
0.92 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
8,473,000 |
|
0.90 |
|
Exercised |
|
(4,494,600 |
) |
0.69 |
|
(650,000 |
) |
0.92 |
|
Expired |
|
(1,450,000 |
) |
0.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year |
|
44,365,826 |
|
0.94 |
|
50,310,426 |
|
0.92 |
|
The Company had the following share purchase warrants outstanding at June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Number of |
|
remaining |
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
warrants |
|
warrants |
|
contractual |
|
Expiry Date |
|
price ($) |
|
outstanding |
|
exercisable |
|
life (years) |
|
December 9, 2011 |
|
0.90 |
|
7,727,250 |
|
7,727,250 |
|
0.4 |
|
February 20, 2014 |
|
0.95 |
|
36,638,576 |
|
36,638,576 |
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
0.94 |
|
44,365,826 |
|
44,365,826 |
|
2.2 |
|
ECU Silver Mining Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(unaudited, expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
13. Commitments
Operating leases
The Company is committed operating leases with annual payment requirements as follows:
Year |
|
Amount $ |
|
2011 |
|
86,089 |
|
2012 |
|
174,646 |
|
2013 |
|
61,758 |
|
2014 |
|
39,082 |
|
2015 and beyond |
|
9,770 |
|
|
|
371,345 |
|
14. Contingencies
Intangible Asset
In January 2005, the Company acquired the rights to use a technology which is expected to increase material recuperation of current and future Mexican projects. At the time the agreement was reached the Company issued 500,000 common shares and the Company is bound to issue an additional 500,000 common shares should it choose to use the technology at a commercial scale. In addition, the agreement provides that the Company pay royalties of 1.5% of all production resulting from the application of the technology in Mexican properties. The technology was not employed in the current period.
15. Loss per share
The computations of basic and diluted loss per share are as follows:
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
||||
Loss for the period |
|
$ |
4,385,910 |
|
$ |
3,319,722 |
|
$ |
6,467,870 |
|
$ |
5,235,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic weighted average number of common shares |
|
312,132,051 |
|
307,286,733 |
|
311,269,949 |
|
304,758,877 |
|
||||
Dilutive potential from options and warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
496,680 |
|
|
|
||||
Dilutive weighted average number of common shares |
|
312,132,051 |
|
307,286,733 |
|
311,766,629 |
|
304,758,877 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Loss per share, basic and diluted |
|
$ |
0.014 |
|
$ |
0.011 |
|
$ |
0.021 |
|
$ |
0.017 |
|
ECU Silver Mining Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(unaudited, expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
16. Management of Capital
The Companys objectives in managing its capital resources are to ensure the entitys ability to continue as a going concern. The Company satisfies its capital requirements through careful management of its cash resources and by utilizing credit facilities or issuing equity, as necessary, based on the prevalent economic conditions of both the industry and the capital markets and the underlying risks characteristics of the related assets.
As at June 30, 2011, the Company had long-term debt of $16,618,541 US dollars. In January 2011, the Company restructured the facility with its lender. Principal repayments under the amended facility are payable in thirty equal monthly payments commencing July 31, 2011 and ending December 31, 2013.
The Company is also obligated to semi-annual payments of $1,000,000 US dollars due under terms of a mineral concession agreement. One final payments is due November 17, 2011.
Based on current plans and estimates management believes that its operations can be funded through working capital, potential future credit facilities, and cash flow expected to be generated from the sale of products from its operations. As discussed note 1, the Company is dependent on its ability to raise the necessary capital to fund its operations and management can not provide assurance that it will ultimately be able to complete the required funding transactions. Furthermore, since we do not have proven and probable reserves we can not predict with confidence the level of cash flows that will be generated from the milling operations. As such, we may need to either restructure our long term debt so that repayment requirements match the cash generation capability or raise additional equity in the alternate. Management can provide no guarantee that the Company will be successful in these transactions should they be required.
The Company is not subject to any externally imposed capital requirements and there has been no change with respect to the overall capital risk management strategy during the period.
ECU Silver Mining Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(unaudited, expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
17. Financial Instruments
The Companys financial instruments consist of the following:
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
||||||
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
Financial Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Amortized cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
655,565 |
|
655,565 |
|
344,826 |
|
344,826 |
|
7,647,023 |
|
7,647,023 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
1,797,749 |
|
1,797,749 |
|
1,437,570 |
|
1,437,570 |
|
951,802 |
|
951,802 |
|
Advances and deposits |
|
252,289 |
|
252,289 |
|
187,912 |
|
187,912 |
|
112,195 |
|
112,195 |
|
Financial Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Amortized cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
7,970,743 |
|
7,970,743 |
|
3,600,407 |
|
3,600,407 |
|
4,360,474 |
|
4,360,474 |
|
Customer advances |
|
4,026,788 |
|
4,026,788 |
|
5,017,757 |
|
5,017,757 |
|
1,944,350 |
|
1,944,350 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
16,971,357 |
|
16,971,357 |
|
18,382,120 |
|
18,382,120 |
|
21,089,821 |
|
21,089,821 |
|
The fair value of all financial assets approximate their carrying values due to their short-term maturity. For financial liabilities, except in the case of long-term debt, the fair value approximates the carrying amount because the market rate of interest is paid. There are no outstanding financial instruments measured at fair value and accordingly no disclosure of the fair value hierarchy.
ECU Silver Mining Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(unaudited, expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
18. San Diego - Joint Venture
The Companys consolidated financial statements include the following amounts related to the San Diego Joint Venture which is considered a jointly controlled asset:
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
January 1, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2010 |
|
Long term assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mining property costs |
|
1,088,702 |
|
630,223 |
|
615,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows resulting from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mining property costs |
|
(453,599 |
) |
(9,506 |
) |
(60,876 |
) |
ECUs share in the joint venture with Golden Tag Resources Ltd (Golden Tag) is 50% of the mining property costs incurred following the $1,500,000 US dollars earn in by Golden Tag as well as a 50% interest in the rights of the San Diego property.
19. Loss Carry Forwards
These financial statements do not recognize a deferred tax asset for tax loss carry forwards as it cannot be demonstrated that the Company will have taxable profits in the future with which to offset these losses. The Company will review at each reporting date the unrecognized deferred tax asset to determine whether an asset should be recognized based upon the circumstances at that time.
At December 31, 2010, the Company had non-capital loss carry forwards, available to offset future taxable income for Canadian tax purposes, aggregating $10,209,887 which expire over the period between 2014 and 2030.
At December 31, 2010, the Company had tax loss carry forwards, available to offset future taxable income in Mexico, aggregating $39,566,687 which expire between 2011 and 2020.
20. Income tax expense
There is no current income tax expense or provision for deferred tax as a result of tax losses and because of recent operating losses the Company cannot demonstrate future taxable profits meaning a deferred tax asset on tax losses carried forward cannot be recognized.
ECU Silver Mining Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(unaudited, expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
21. Related Party Transactions
Key management personnel includes the members of the management team who directly report to the chief executive officer
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Salaries and other short term benefits |
|
617,193 |
|
258,596 |
|
888,517 |
|
517,535 |
|
Share-based payments |
|
|
|
142,429 |
|
|
|
409,951 |
|
|
|
617,193 |
|
401,025 |
|
888,517 |
|
927,486 |
|
22. Finance costs
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
||||
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Interest and bank charges |
|
223,941 |
|
156,651 |
|
454,330 |
|
253,879 |
|
Interest on long term debt |
|
575,075 |
|
684,334 |
|
1,170,862 |
|
1,369,872 |
|
Long term debt restructuring fee |
|
|
|
|
|
483,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
799,016 |
|
840,985 |
|
2,108,592 |
|
1,623,751 |
|
23. Transition to IFRS
The accounting policies set out in Note 3 of the consolidated interim financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2011 have been applied without change in preparing the consolidated interim financial statements for the six months ended June 30, 2011. In Note 23 of the March 31, 2011 consolidated interim financial statements, the Company reported the impact of the transition to IFRS at January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2010. There have been no changes to the reconciliations as previously reported.
In preparing these IFRS financial statements, the Company has adjusted amounts reported previously in financial statements prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP (CGAAP). An explanation of how the transition from CGAAP to IFRS has affected the Companys equity and financial performance is set out in the following reconciliations:
· reconciliation of equity at June 30, 2010
· reconciliation of total comprehensive income for the three months ended June 30, 2010
· reconciliation of total comprehensive income for the six months ended June 30, 2010
No reconciliation is required for the consolidated cash flow statement as there are no significant differences.
ECU Silver Mining Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(unaudited, expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
Equity Reconciliation at June 30, 2010
Total equity reported under CGAAP |
|
60,070,932 |
|
Adjustment required in changing from the temporal method |
|
(10,663,598 |
) |
Adjustment required to retrospectively apply IFRS 2 |
|
20,017 |
|
Total equity reported under IFRS |
|
49,427,351 |
|
Total Comprehensive Income Reconciliation for three months ended June 30, 2010
Total comprehensive loss reported under CGAAP |
|
3,400,930 |
|
Adjustment required in changing from the temporal method |
|
1,197,623 |
|
Adjustment required to retrospectively apply IFRS 2 |
|
(81,208 |
) |
Total comprehensive loss reported under IFRS |
|
4,517,345 |
|
Total Comprehensive Income Reconciliation for six months ended June 30, 2010
Total comprehensive loss reported under CGAAP |
|
5,253,280 |
|
Adjustment required in changing from the temporal method |
|
485,660 |
|
Adjustment required to retrospectively apply IFRS 2 |
|
(92 |
) |
Total comprehensive loss reported under IFRS |
|
5,738,848 |
|
Explanation for reconciling items
Under CGAAP the Company used the temporal method in translating foreign operations and non-monetary assets and liabilities in foreign currency to the presentation currency. This adjustment is primarily the impact of translating mining property costs and property plant and equipment at the closing rates on consolidation rather than the historic rates and removing exchange differences on the consolidation of foreign operations from profit or loss and including in equity.
The method of calculating the fair value under IFRS 2 for stock based compensation plans is different than CGAAP due to grading and allowing an assumption for a forfeiture. This adjustment is the impact of this difference.
ECU Silver Mining Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(unaudited, expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
24. Subsequent Events
Private Placement Financing
On June 24, 2011, the Company announced that it had entered into a definitive agreement in respect of a business combination transaction (the Transaction) with Golden Minerals Company (Golden Minerals) and a subscription agreement pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue to Golden Minerals $15 million in principal amount of 0.0% convertible senior unsecured notes due June 30, 2012 (the Notes) at par in a private placement. On July 13, 2011, the private placement was completed and the Company issued the Notes. The Notes are convertible by Golden Minerals at any time prior to 5:00 p.m. (Toronto time) on June 29, 2012 into common shares of the Company at a rate of 1,032 common shares for each $1,000 in principal amount converted. The Notes are also redeemable at par by the Company. In addition, the Company may elect to extend the maturity of the Notes for up to 6 months under certain conditions, with interest accruing at 10% per annum during such extension period. The proceeds of the Note are held in an escrow account and may only be used by the Company for specified purposes, including (i) expenses associated with development, exploration, operating and general and administrative costs relating to the development and operating activities at the Velardeña property; (ii) general and administrative expenses and the various expenses incurred in connection with the Transaction; (iii) regularly scheduled principal and interest payments on arms length indebtedness existing at the date of the Note issuance; and (iv) such other expenditures as may be approved by Golden Minerals.
Property Acquisition
On July 21, 2011, the Company acquired 100% ownership of the Flechas property through the issuance of 3,000,000 shares.
25. Approval of the financial statements
The consolidated interim financial statements of ECU Silver Mining Inc. for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 were approved and authorized for issue by the Board of Directors on August 15, 2011.
These consolidated interim financial statements have been amended to include note 26 which presents the material differences between Canadian and United States generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
26. Amendment for disclosure of Material Differences between Canadian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
The Company prepares its consolidated financial statements in Canada in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and in accordance with Interpretations as issued by the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRIC) which differ in certain respects from GAAP in the United States. The effect of the principal measurement differences between IFRS and United States GAAP are summarized in the following:
ECU Silver Mining Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(unaudited, expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
Consolidated summarized balance sheets:
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
IFRS |
|
Adjustments |
|
U.S.
|
|
IFRS |
|
Adjustments |
|
U.S.
|
|
IFRS |
|
Adjustments |
|
U.S.
|
|
|
|
Footnote |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
655,565 |
|
|
|
655,565 |
|
344,826 |
|
|
|
344,826 |
|
7,647,023 |
|
|
|
7,647,023 |
|
Accounts receivable, advances and deposits |
|
|
|
2,050,038 |
|
|
|
2,050,038 |
|
1,625,482 |
|
|
|
1,625,482 |
|
1,063,997 |
|
|
|
1,063,997 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
e |
|
104,737 |
|
671 |
|
105,408 |
|
37,189 |
|
119 |
|
37,308 |
|
77,143 |
|
1,559 |
|
78,702 |
|
Non current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mining property costs and property, plant and equipment |
|
a, b, c, e, f |
|
73,450,475 |
|
(22,907,249 |
) |
50,543,226 |
|
72,188,840 |
|
(22,021,793 |
) |
50,167,047 |
|
70,399,059 |
|
(19,009,299 |
) |
51,389,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
76,260,815 |
|
(22,906,578 |
) |
52,865,371 |
|
74,196,337 |
|
(22,021,674 |
) |
52,174,663 |
|
7,918,722 |
|
(19,007,740 |
) |
60,179,482 |
|
Liabilities and equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
|
7,970,743 |
|
|
|
7,970,743 |
|
3,600,407 |
|
|
|
3,600,407 |
|
4,360,474 |
|
|
|
4,360,474 |
|
Customer advances |
|
|
|
4,026,788 |
|
|
|
4,026,788 |
|
5,017,757 |
|
|
|
5,017,757 |
|
1,944,350 |
|
|
|
1,944,350 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
|
7,341,006 |
|
|
|
7,341,006 |
|
5,136,522 |
|
|
|
5,136,522 |
|
4,578,601 |
|
|
|
4,578,601 |
|
Non current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
9,630,351 |
|
|
|
9,630,351 |
|
13,245,598 |
|
|
|
13,245,598 |
|
16,511,220 |
|
|
|
16,511,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
28,968,888 |
|
|
|
28,968,888 |
|
27,000,284 |
|
|
|
27,000,284 |
|
27,394,645 |
|
|
|
27,394,645 |
|
Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital |
|
|
|
149,107,110 |
|
|
|
149,107,110 |
|
142,362,799 |
|
|
|
142,362,799 |
|
132,275,566 |
|
|
|
132,275,566 |
|
Value assigned to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributed surplus |
|
|
|
26,380,797 |
|
|
|
26,380,797 |
|
27,290,386 |
|
|
|
27,290,386 |
|
25,020,424 |
|
243,969 |
|
24,776,655 |
|
Special warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,801,114 |
|
|
|
10,801,114 |
|
Other reserves |
|
e |
|
1,125,970 |
|
(265,513 |
) |
860,457 |
|
396,948 |
|
(396,948 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deficit |
|
a, b, c, e, f |
|
(129,321,950 |
) |
(22,641,065 |
) |
(151,963,015 |
) |
(122,854,080 |
) |
(21,624,726 |
) |
(144,478,806 |
) |
(116,304,527 |
) |
(18,763,971 |
) |
(135,068,498 |
) |
|
|
|
|
47,291,927 |
|
(22,906,578 |
) |
24,385,349 |
|
47,196,053 |
|
(22,021,674 |
) |
25,174,379 |
|
51,792,577 |
|
(19,007,740 |
) |
32,784,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,260,815 |
|
(22,906,578 |
) |
53,354,237 |
|
74,196,337 |
|
(22,021,674 |
) |
52,174,663 |
|
79,187,222 |
|
(19,007,740 |
) |
60,179,482 |
|
ECU Silver Mining Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(unaudited, expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
Consolidated summarized statements of loss and other comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
||||
|
|
Footnote |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss in accordance with IFRS |
|
|
|
(4,385,910 |
) |
(3,319,722 |
) |
(6,467,870 |
) |
(5,235,158 |
) |
Mining property costs |
|
a |
|
(2,171,008 |
) |
(1,190,113 |
) |
(3,439,956 |
) |
(2,566,430 |
) |
Other income |
|
b |
|
91,227 |
|
1,211,367 |
|
2,423,617 |
|
1,351,798 |
|
Stock-based compensation and stock options expense |
|
c |
|
|
|
(28,609 |
) |
|
|
(52,527 |
) |
Financing fees for convertible debentures |
|
d |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,603 |
) |
Accretion expense relating to convertible debentures |
|
d |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,879 |
|
Stock based compensation plans fair value |
|
f |
|
|
|
81,208 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
Loss in accordance with U.S. GAAP |
|
|
|
(6,465,691 |
) |
(3,245,869 |
) |
(7,484,209 |
) |
(6,499,949 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss in accordance with IFRS |
|
|
|
131,435 |
|
(88,885 |
) |
(729,022 |
) |
(2,280,364 |
) |
Foreign currency translation reserve |
|
e |
|
(131,435 |
) |
88,885 |
|
729,022 |
|
2,280,364 |
|
Other comprehensive loss in accordance with U.S. GAAP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss in accordance with U.S. GAAP |
|
|
|
(6,465,691 |
) |
(3,245,869 |
) |
(7,484,209 |
) |
(6,499,949 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
312,132,051 |
|
307,286,733 |
|
311,269,949 |
|
304,758,877 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
312,132,051 |
|
307,286,733 |
|
311,766,629 |
|
304,758,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share in accordance with U.S. GAAP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
(0.021 |
) |
(0.011 |
) |
(0.024 |
) |
(0.021 |
) |
Diluted |
|
|
|
(0.021 |
) |
(0.011 |
) |
(0.024 |
) |
(0.021 |
) |
Consolidated summarized statements of deficit:
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
||||
|
|
Footnote |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deficit, end of period, pursuant to IFRS |
|
|
|
(129,321,950 |
) |
(121,539,685 |
) |
(129,321,950 |
) |
(121,539,685 |
) |
Opening US GAAP adjustments balance |
|
|
|
(20,561,284 |
) |
(20,346,384 |
) |
(21,624,726 |
) |
(19,007,740 |
) |
Mining property costs |
|
a |
|
(2,171,008 |
) |
(1,190,113 |
) |
(3,439,956 |
) |
(2,566,430 |
) |
Other income |
|
b |
|
91,227 |
|
1,211,367 |
|
2,423,617 |
|
1,351,798 |
|
Stock-based compensation and stock options expense |
|
c |
|
|
|
(28,609 |
) |
|
|
(52,527 |
) |
Financing fees for convertible debentures |
|
d |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,603 |
) |
Accretion expense relating to convertible debentures |
|
d |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,879 |
|
Stock based compensation plans fair value |
|
f |
|
|
|
81,208 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
Deficit, end of period, pursuant to U.S. GAAP |
|
|
|
(151,963,015 |
) |
(141,812,216 |
) |
(151,963,015 |
) |
(141,812,216 |
) |
ECU Silver Mining Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(unaudited, expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
Consolidated summarized statements of cash flows:
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
Six months ended
|
|
||||
|
|
Footnote |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided from (used in) operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to IFRS |
|
|
|
(647,243 |
) |
(584,171 |
) |
(1,510,425 |
) |
(3,689,148 |
) |
Mining property costs |
|
g |
|
(2,171,008 |
) |
(1,190,113 |
) |
(3,439,956 |
) |
(2,566,430 |
) |
Other income |
|
g |
|
91,227 |
|
1,211,367 |
|
2,423,617 |
|
1,351,798 |
|
Stock-based compensation and stock options expense |
|
g |
|
|
|
(28,609 |
) |
|
|
(52,527 |
) |
Pursuant to U.S. GAAP |
|
|
|
(2,727,024 |
) |
(591,526 |
) |
(2,526,764 |
) |
(4,956,307 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided from (used in) investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to IFRS |
|
|
|
(3,165,694 |
) |
(1,050,040 |
) |
(1,885,534 |
) |
(1,914,853 |
) |
Mining property costs |
|
g |
|
2,171,008 |
|
1,190,113 |
|
3,439,956 |
|
2,566,430 |
|
Other income |
|
g |
|
(91,227 |
) |
(1,211,367 |
) |
(2,423,617 |
) |
(1,351,798 |
) |
Stock-based compensation and stock options expense |
|
g |
|
|
|
28,609 |
|
|
|
52,527 |
|
Pursuant to U.S. GAAP |
|
|
|
(1,085,913 |
) |
(1,042,685 |
) |
(869,195 |
) |
(647,694 |
) |
Notes to consolidated United States GAAP adjustments:
a. Mining property costs
Under IFRS, exploration and evaluation expenditures on identifiable properties are capitalized. Costs of acquiring mineral properties and related evaluation expenditures during the exploration and evaluation stages include those costs related to the search for mineral resources, the determination of technical feasibility and the assessment of commercial viability of an identified resource. United States GAAP requires that all exploration costs be expensed.
b. Mining property costs classification in other income
Under IFRS, net revenue or expense derived from a mineral property prior to the production phase of a mine is capitalized and included in the cost of the asset. A United States GAAP adjustment arises because United States GAAP requires that all exploration related costs and associated revenues be expensed. Furthermore, United States GAAP requires that any incremental and direct costs associated with the sale of excavated saleable minerals during the development phase of the mine and prior to the production phase of the mine be classified as Other income and offset by the related amounts of proceeds from the sale of these minerals. Incremental and direct costs are those costs that would otherwise have not been incurred if not for the sale of these minerals.
c. Stock-based compensation and stock options
Under IFRS, stock-based compensation costs and stock option costs incurred during the exploration or development stage of the mineral properties are capitalized prior to the establishment of proven or probable reserves in circumstances where they are directly related to the exploration and evaluation of an underlying identifiable mineral property. United States GAAP requires that all stock-based compensation costs and stock option costs be expensed.
d. Convertible debentures
Under IFRS, convertible debenture proceeds are allocated between their debt and equity component parts based on the relative fair values of the debt component and the embedded conversion feature. The debt component is accreted to the face value of the debentures with the resulting interest expense charged to operations. The costs of the
financing are allocated on a proportional basis between the liability and equity portions based on their relative fair values with the liability portion of the costs expensed and the equity portion treated as a reduction of the gross proceeds allocated to the equity component. United States GAAP treats the convertible debenture solely as a liability since the embedded conversion feature does not meet US GAAP requirements for classification as an equity component. The liability is recorded at its full face value since the embedded conversion feature has no intrinsic value on a stand-alone basis and accordingly does not meet the requirements of an equity component under United States GAAP. United States GAAP requires that convertible debentures, net of issuance costs, be accreted to face value over the term ending on the first put date of the debentures which, in this case, is the issuance date of the debentures since the debentures are convertible on demand by the Unit holders. Thus, the debentures carrying value prior to conversion equaled their face value on the balance sheet.
e. Foreign currency translation reserve
Under IFRS, the results and financial position of subsidiaries that have a functional currency different from the presentation currency are translated into the presentation currency as follows: assets and liabilities are translated at the closing rate at the reporting date; income and expenses for each income statement item are translated at average exchange rates for the period; and all resulting exchange differences are recognized in other comprehensive income as foreign currency translation reserve. United States GAAP requires that certain non-monetary assets and liabilities in foreign currencies be translated at historical rates such as mining property costs and property plant and equipment. Therefore, for US GAAP purposes, mining property costs and property plant and equipment have been translated at their historical rates such that the IFRS financial statements have been adjusted to reclassify the foreign currency translation reserve from deficit and other reserves to the underlying Balance Sheet items impacted.
f. Stock based compensation plans fair value
Under IFRS, the method of calculating the fair value of stock based compensation plans includes the requirement to adjust the compensation expense for estimates of non-market vesting conditions, such as options that are not expected to vest (i.e. forfeitures). Furthermore, IFRS grading of stock based compensation for purposes of the determination of fair value is based on each tranche in an award being considered a separate award with its own vesting period and grant date fair value. United States GAAP does not require any initial estimation of non-market vesting conditions (i.e. forfeitures) and the method of calculating fair value does not require the grading of each tranche in an award as a separate award. Therefore, for US GAAP purposes, the method of calculating the fair value for stock based compensation plans differs due to the exclusion of the non-market vesting conditions (i.e. forfeitures) and the exclusion of the grading of each tranche in an award as a separate award.
g. Mining property costs classification in statement of cash flow
United States GAAP requires that cash flows relating to mineral property exploration and land use costs be reported as operating activities. However, under IFRS mineral property exploration and evaluation expenditures are classified as investing activities.
Other disclosures:
The following additional information would be presented if these consolidated financial statements were presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP:
i. Auditors Report: Emphasis of matter paragraph
In the United States, reporting standards for auditors require the addition of an explanatory paragraph (following the opinion paragraph) when the financial statements are affected by conditions and events that cast substantial doubt on the Companys ability to continue as a going concern, such as those described in Note 1 to these interim unaudited
consolidated financial statements. IFRS do not permit a reference to such events and conditions in the auditors report when these are adequately disclosed in the financial statements. The Company draws attention to Note 1 to these financial statements, which describes certain conditions that give rise to substantial doubt about the entitys ability to continue as a going concern. However, these financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty consistent with the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010 whereby the Auditors opinion was not qualified in respect of this matter.
ii. Joint Venture
San Diego Joint Venture has been recorded under IFRS on a proportionate basis whereas under United States GAAP, investments in incorporated joint ventures should be accounted for using the equity method. However, the Company has elected to use the accommodation of the SEC whereby the accounting for joint ventures need not be reconciled from IFRS to United States GAAP since the different accounting treatment affects only the presentation and classification of financial statement items and not net income or shareholders equity.
iii. Accounts receivable
|
|
June 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
January 1,
|
|
Value added tax recoverable |
|
1,281,809 |
|
1,077,878 |
|
661,311 |
|
Trade receivables |
|
510,030 |
|
357,320 |
|
125,171 |
|
Other receivables |
|
258,199 |
|
190,284 |
|
277,515 |
|
|
|
2,050,038 |
|
1,625,482 |
|
1,063,997 |
|
iv. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian tax purposes |
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance |
|
8,358,927 |
|
5,692,955 |
|
Increases based on tax positions related to the current year |
|
1,850,960 |
|
2,665,972 |
|
|
|
10,209,887 |
|
8,358,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mexican tax purposes |
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance |
|
45,026,853 |
|
32,343,850 |
|
Increase (decrease) based on tax positions related to the current year |
|
(5,460,166 |
) |
12,683,003 |
|
|
|
39,566,687 |
|
45,026,853 |
|
v. Income tax uncertainty
The Company and its subsidiaries file federal income tax returns in Canada and Mexico; the Companys Mexican subsidiaries also file Mexican state tax returns where required by law. With few exceptions, the Company and its Mexican subsidiaries are subject to Canadian federal or Mexican federal, state and local examinations by the tax authorities for a minimum of four years in arrearage to the extent that the Company receives a notice of assessment from the respective competent authorities.
vi. iv. Deferred income tax
IFRS financial statements do not take into account the tax benefit arising from loss carry forwards which are available to the Company to reduce its income for tax purposes in future periods so that no deferred income tax has been recorded in these IFRS financial statements. Deferred tax assets are not recognized for the tax benefit arising from loss carry forwards to the extent that it is not probable that taxable profits will be available against which these loss carry forwards can be utilized in the future. The Company has disclosed its non-capital loss carry forwards and tax loss carry forwards as at December 31, 2010 in Note 19, Loss carry forwards to these interim unaudited consolidated financial statements. Therefore, consistent with the current IFRS accounting treatment, no deferred income tax consequences have been recorded under United States GAAP relating to US GAAP adjustments recorded in the reconciliations forthwith.
Managements Report on Responsibility
The preparation and presentation of the accompanying amended consolidated financial statements is the responsibility of the Companys management. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles and reflect managements best estimates and judgement.
Management, under the supervision of and the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have a process in place to evaluate disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting as required by Canadian securities regulators.
The Board of Directors is responsible for ensuring that management fulfils its responsibilities for financial reporting and is responsible for reviewing and approving the consolidated financial statements. The Audit Committee reviews the results of the audit and the consolidated financial statements and submits its findings to the Board of Directors for their consideration when approving the consolidated financial statements.
The amended consolidated financial statements as at December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the years then ended have been audited by Guimond Lavallée Inc., Chartered Accountants, and their report outlines the scope of their examination and gives their opinion on the amended audited consolidated financial statements.
Signed MICHEL ROY |
|
Signed DWIGHT WALKER |
|
|
|
Michel Roy |
|
Dwight Walker |
Chief Executive Officer |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
July 11, 2011
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (United States) and Canadian securities regulations, for ECU Silver Mining Inc. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Due to its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis. Also, projections of the effectiveness of internal control are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to the financial statement preparation and presentation.
Management carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010. The framework on which such evaluation was based is contained in the report entitled Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). This evaluation included review of the documentation of controls, evaluation of the design effectiveness of controls, testing of the operating effectiveness of controls and a conclusion on this evaluation. Although there are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system of internal control over financial reporting, based on this evaluation, management has concluded that the system of internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2010.
Guimond Lavallée Inc, our independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting at ECU Silver Mining Inc. as at December 31, 2010, which is presented hereinafter.
Signed MICHEL ROY |
|
Signed DWIGHT WALKER |
|
|
|
Michel Roy |
|
Dwight Walker |
Chief Executive Officer |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
Independent Auditors Report
To the Shareholders of ECU Silver Mining Inc.,
We have completed integrated audits of ECU Silver Mining Incs. (the Company) 2010 and 2009 consolidated financial statements and of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010. Our opinions, based on our audits, are presented below.
Report on the consolidated financial statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of ECU Silver Mining Inc., which comprise the consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the consolidated statements of loss, comprehensive loss and deficit and cash flows for the years then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Managements responsibility for the consolidated financial statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles and for such internal control as management determines necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditors responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. Canadian generally accepted auditing standards require that we comply with ethical requirements.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence, on a test basis, about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditors judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risks assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Companys preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting principles and policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained in our audits is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion on the consolidated financial statements.
Opinion
In our opinion, the amended consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of ECU Silver Mining Inc. as at December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.
Emphasis of Matter
Without modifying our opinion, the consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 have been amended as disclosed in note 20 to the consolidated financial statements. Our report dated March 29, 2011 on the previously issued consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 has been amended, as such.
Report on internal control over financial reporting
We have also audited ECU Silver Mining Inc. internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on the criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission.
Management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Managements report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
An audit of internal control over financial reporting includes obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on assessed risk and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our audit opinion on the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
A Companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A Companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, ECU Silver Mining Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on the criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Guimond Lavallée Inc.
Chartered Accountants
Brossard, Quebec
March 29, 2011 except as to note 20 which is at July 11, 2011
(1) Chartered Accountants auditor permit No. 23358
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
as at December 31, 2010 and 2009
(in Canadian dollars) |
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
344,826 |
|
7,647,023 |
|
Accounts receivable, advances and deposits (Note 3) |
|
1,625,482 |
|
1,063,997 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
37,308 |
|
78,702 |
|
|
|
2,007,616 |
|
8,789,722 |
|
Mining property costs and property, plant and equipment ( Note 5) |
|
84,677,184 |
|
83,344,556 |
|
|
|
86,684,800 |
|
92,134,278 |
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
3,600,407 |
|
4,360,474 |
|
Customer advances (Note 6) |
|
5,017,757 |
|
1,944,350 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt (Note 7) |
|
5,136,522 |
|
4,578,601 |
|
|
|
13,754,686 |
|
10,883,425 |
|
Long-term debt (Note 7) |
|
13,245,598 |
|
16,511,220 |
|
|
|
27,000,284 |
|
27,394,645 |
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital (Notes 8, 9, 10) |
|
142,362,799 |
|
132,275,566 |
|
Special warrants (Note 8) |
|
|
|
10,801,114 |
|
Contributed surplus (Note 11) |
|
27,290,386 |
|
24,776,655 |
|
Deficit |
|
(109,968,669 |
) |
(103,113,702 |
) |
|
|
59,684,516 |
|
64,739,633 |
|
|
|
86,684,800 |
|
92,134,278 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 12 and 13)
Approved by the Board of Directors:
Signed MICHEL ROY |
|
SignedTALAL CHEHAB |
Director |
|
Director |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF LOSS, COMPREHENSIVE LOSS AND DEFICIT
for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
(in Canadian dollars) |
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
General and administration Mexico |
|
3,705,073 |
|
4,376,844 |
|
General and administration Canada |
|
1,828,161 |
|
1,505,568 |
|
Stock based compensation |
|
856,604 |
|
1,572,144 |
|
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment |
|
214,707 |
|
182,679 |
|
Interest income |
|
(4,397 |
) |
(57,311 |
) |
Interest and bank charges |
|
778,814 |
|
762,111 |
|
Interest on long term debt |
|
2,693,739 |
|
2,752,648 |
|
Foreign exchange gain |
|
(1,314,059 |
) |
(3,520,810 |
) |
Inventory write-down (Note 4) |
|
141,938 |
|
844,064 |
|
Inventory write-down reversal (Note 4) |
|
(2,045,613 |
) |
|
|
|
|
6,854,967 |
|
8,417,937 |
|
Loss and Comprehensive loss for the year |
|
(6,854,967 |
) |
(8,417,937 |
) |
Deficit, beginning of year |
|
(103,113,702 |
) |
(93,818,364 |
) |
Conversion of convertible debentures |
|
|
|
(877,401 |
) |
Deficit, end of year |
|
(109,968,669 |
) |
(103,113,702 |
) |
Loss per share (Note 14) |
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share |
|
(0.022 |
) |
(0.030 |
) |
Weighted average number of shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
306,073,467 |
|
277,277,485 |
|
Diluted |
|
307,360,967 |
|
277,922,907 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
(in Canadian dollars) |
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss for the period |
|
(6,854,967 |
) |
(8,417,937 |
) |
Items not affecting cash |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment |
|
214,707 |
|
182,679 |
|
Stock based compensation |
|
856,604 |
|
1,572,144 |
|
Inventory write-down reversal (Note 4) |
|
(2,045,613 |
) |
|
|
Unrealized foreign exchange gain |
|
(854,782 |
) |
(2,965,937 |
) |
Accretion interest |
|
499,368 |
|
475,905 |
|
Gain on disposal of capital asset |
|
(5,100 |
) |
(453 |
) |
Changes in non cash working capital items |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
(561,485 |
) |
590,767 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
41,394 |
|
(25,479 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
(760,067 |
) |
790,790 |
|
Customer advances |
|
3,073,407 |
|
1,944,350 |
|
Cash used in operating activities |
|
(6,396,534 |
) |
(5,853,171 |
) |
INVESTMENT ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from property development |
|
19,345,686 |
|
6,577,167 |
|
Mining property exploration and development costs |
|
(17,635,897 |
) |
(10,555,086 |
) |
Mining property acquisition costs (Note 15) |
|
(2,487,037 |
) |
(3,428,880 |
) |
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |
|
(958,378 |
) |
(11,267,378 |
) |
Cash used in investing activities |
|
(1,735,626 |
) |
(18,674,177 |
) |
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares and warrants issued for cash, net |
|
|
|
31,163,086 |
|
Shares issued on exercise of options and warrants |
|
840,000 |
|
|
|
Decrease in promissory notes payable |
|
|
|
(783,166 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in long term debt |
|
(15,780 |
) |
918,161 |
|
Cash generated by financing activities |
|
824,220 |
|
31,298,081 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
5,743 |
|
(59,725 |
) |
Decrease in restricted Cash |
|
|
|
397,800 |
|
Increase (Decrease) in cash and cash equivalents during the year |
|
(7,302,197 |
) |
7,108,808 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
|
7,647,023 |
|
538,215 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year |
|
344,826 |
|
7,647,023 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
(in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
1. NATURE OF ACTIVITIES
ECU Silver Mining Inc. (ECU, or the Company) is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of mining properties in Mexico that are mainly gold-bearing and silver-bearing. The Company has earned revenues from its exploration and development activities and is considered to be in the development stage. It has not yet determined whether a sufficient proportion of its mineral resources are economically exploitable and, accordingly, has not yet determined whether the mining properties contain economic mineral reserves.
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes that the Company will, in the ordinary course of business, be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities. The recoverability of the accumulated costs shown for mining properties and related deferred costs is dependent upon the existence of economically recoverable reserves, future profitable production, and on the Companys ability to obtain the necessary financing to fund its operations.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles. The significant accounting policies followed by the Company are summarized as follows:
a) Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and those of its subsidiaries, all owned by ECU, BLM Minera Mexicana S.A de C.V., Minera William S.A de C.V., and Minera Labri S.A. de C.V., and on a proportionate basis, the accounts of the San Diego Joint Venture. All inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated.
b) Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated financial statements. Significant areas where managements judgement has been applied include; the useful life of capital assets, the estimated net realizable value of inventory, asset impairment, stock-based compensation, and future income tax assets and liabilities. While management believes that these estimates and assumptions are reasonable, actual results could vary significantly.
c) Revenue recognition
Revenue is recognized upon delivery when title and risk of ownership of metal and metal bearing concentrates passes to the buyer and when collection is reasonably assured. The contained metal in the concentrates shipped is assayed and the appropriate negotiated amount of recoverable metal contained therein is recorded as revenue based on the then current market rate of the metals. The concentrates are sold under contracts that provide for final prices to be determined by quoted market prices in a period subsequent to the date of the sale. Variations from the provisionally priced sales are recognized as revenue adjustments in the period they occur.
As the Company is in the development stage, all revenues are offset against mining properties and deferred exploration costs in accordance with the recommendations of the section 3061 Property, Plant and Equipment.
d) Foreign Exchange
The Canadian dollar is the functional currency of the Company. The Company uses the temporal method to translate its foreign currency transactions, including its integrated foreign subsidiaries. Monetary assets and liabilities are translated at the rate of exchange in effect at period-end. Other assets and liabilities are translated at their historic rates. Items appearing in the income statement, except for depreciation translated at historic rates, are translated at average rates. Exchange gains and losses are included in the income statement.
e) Cash and cash equivalents
The Companys policy is to present cash and temporary investments having a term of three months or less from the acquisition date with cash and cash equivalents.
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
(in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
f) Inventory
Materials-in-process (concentrates) are valued at lower of average production cost and net realizable value.
g) Mining Properties, and Deferred Exploration and Development Expenses
The amounts recorded as mining properties and deferred exploration costs represent exploration, development and associated operating costs incurred to date and are not intended to reflect present or future values. These costs are deferred until the discovery of economically exploitable reserves and the start-up of the production phase on a property-by-property basis or until the property is abandoned. Mining properties are abandoned when management allows property interests to lapse or when they determine that properties are not economically viable. Costs accumulated relating to projects that are abandoned are written-off in the year in which a decision to discontinue the project is made.
When it has been determined that a mining property can be economically developed as a result of establishing proven and probable reserves, costs incurred prospectively to develop the property are capitalized as incurred and are amortized using the units-of-production method over the estimated life of the ore body based upon recoverable ounces to be mined from estimated proven and probable reserves.
The Company is in the development stage and by definition commercial production has not yet commenced. Commercial production occurs when an asset or property is substantially complete, is fully permitted and ready for its intended use. No amortization of mining properties has been charged in these financial statements.
Where there is an indication that impairment may exist, senior management reviews the carrying values of mining properties and deferred exploration expenditures with a view to assessing whether there has been any impairment in value. In the event that it is determined there is an impairment in the carrying value of any property, the carrying value will be written down or written off, as appropriate. There was no impairment write-down required at December 31, 2010.
Supplies and spare parts are valued at the lower of average cost and replacement cost.
h) Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided for plant and equipment on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets and deferred to mining properties or charged to expense as appropriate. The following estimated useful lives are being used:
Buildings |
|
20 years |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
2 or 8 years |
|
Automotive |
|
4 years |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
10 years |
|
Computer equipment |
|
3 1 / 3 years |
|
Office equipment |
|
10 years |
|
i) Asset retirement obligations
The Company records the present value of its legal obligations associated with the asset retirement when the liability is incurred. The corresponding amount is capitalized as part of the related mining propertys carrying value. While the associated mining property is in the pre-production stage, the liability is accreted over time through periodic charges to mining property costs. In each subsequent period, the carrying amounts of the asset and the liability are adjusted for changes to the Company`s estimate of future cash flows associated with the retirement obligations.
Management estimates that the current present value of legal obligations for asset retirement is de minimis.
j) Income and Mining Taxes
The Company uses the liability method to account for income taxes. Under this method of Section 3465, future tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Future tax assets and liabilities are measured by using
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
(in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
enacted or substantively enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years during which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under Section 3465, the effect on future tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
k) Basic and Diluted Loss per Share
The basic loss per share is calculated using the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. We follow the treasury stock method in calculating diluted earnings per share. Under this method, the weighted average number of shares includes the potentially dilutive effects of the conversion of in-the-money stock options and warrants into common shares. The effect of potential issuances of shares under options and warrants would be anti-dilutive when a loss is reported, and therefore basic and diluted losses per share are the same.
l) Stock-based compensation
Stock options granted to employees and non-employees are accounted for using the fair value method. Under this method, the compensation cost is measured as at the date of the grant by applying the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The determined fair value is recognized as a cost over the vesting period with a corresponding increase to contributed surplus. Those costs which relate to employees engaged in exploration and development of mining properties, are capitalized to deferred mining property costs. On the exercise of stock options, consideration paid and the associated contributed surplus is credited to common shares.
m) Financial Instruments
All financial assets and financial liabilities are classified as either: held-for-trading, available-for-sale, held-to-maturity, loans-and-receivables or other liabilities. Financial assets classified as held-for-trading or available-for-sale, are measured at fair value. Held-to-maturity, and loans-and-receivables are measured initially at fair value then at amortized cost over their term. Financial liabilities are measured at their fair value when they are classified as held-for-trading otherwise they are measured at amortized cost over their term. Initial differences between fair value and maturity value are amortized using the effective interest method.
Holding gains and losses from available-for-sale assets are included in other comprehensive income until realized at which time they are transferred to net income (loss).
Transaction costs such as arrangement and advance fees charged by the Companys principal lender in connection with long term debt are expensed at the time they are incurred.
n) Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards
The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants has announced that publicly accountable enterprises will be required to adopt International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) effective January 1, 2011. At the effective date, the balance sheet as at January 1, 2010 will require conversion to IFRS to establish opening balances which will form the basis for comparative information to be reported in 2011. Accordingly, this is the last set of financial statements for the Company using pre-IFRS.
3. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, ADVANCES AND DEPOSITS
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Trade receivables |
|
357,320 |
|
125,171 |
|
Expenses recoverable from Joint Venture partner |
|
2,372 |
|
165,320 |
|
Value added taxes recoverable |
|
1,077,878 |
|
661,311 |
|
Deposits and advances |
|
187,912 |
|
112,195 |
|
|
|
1,625,482 |
|
1,063,997 |
|
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
(in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
4. INVENTORY
The Company has reflected its gold pyrite material-in-process inventory at a net realizable value of zero. During the first quarter of 2010, this resulted in the Company recording a write-down of inventory of $141,938. During the third quarter, the Company entered into a sales contract for a portion of its unprocessed gold pyrite concentrate inventory. In relation to the pyrite concentrate which was shipped during the year under the sales contract, the Company has recorded a reversal of the costs previously written off amounting to $2,045,613. This reversal has increased deferred mining costs with the offsetting amount recorded as a gain on reversal of inventory write-down.
5. MINING PROPERTY COSTS AND PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
December 31, |
|
||||
|
|
Cost |
|
Accumulated
|
|
Net Book
|
|
2009
|
|
Mining properties |
|
67,403,911 |
|
|
|
67,403,911 |
|
64,693,133 |
|
Land, buildings and equipment |
|
23,553,854 |
|
6,893,641 |
|
16,660,213 |
|
18,114,889 |
|
|
|
90,957,765 |
|
6,893,641 |
|
84,064,124 |
|
82,808,022 |
|
Supplies and spare parts |
|
|
|
|
|
613,060 |
|
536,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,677,184 |
|
83,344,556 |
|
Expenditures on mining properties are as follows:
Velardeña
The Velardeña property is located in the Velardeña mining district, within the municipality of Cuencamé, in the northeast quadrant of the State of Durango, Mexico. The property is situated approximately 95 km southwest of the city of Torreón in the State of Coahuila and 140 km northeast of the city of Durango, capital of the State of Durango. The property consists of 20 contiguous mineral concessions totalling 233.2 hectares.
The Company was actively mining on the property and processing the mined material at its mills situated near the town of Velardeña. Both the doré bars that are generated at the Companys oxide mill and the concentrates generated at its flotation mill are being sold.
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
(in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
5. MINING PROPERTY COSTS AND PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (Continued)
Deferred costs for the Velardeña property have been offset by the related revenues. During the year total of such revenues was $19,345,686 ($6,577,167 2009). The cumulative amount of such revenues for the Velardeña property is $37,423,996 ($18,078,310 2009).
Chicago
The Chicago property is located approximately 2 km south of the Velardeña property. The property consists of 8 contiguous mineral concessions totalling 315.88 hectares. The Company has full title to the claims. The Company was actively mining on the property and processing the mined material at its mills situated near the town of Velardeña.
San Diego
The San Diego property is located 9 km northeast of ECUs Velardeña property. It is comprised of 4 contiguous mineral concessions totalling an area of 91.65 hectares and is being explored under the terms of a joint venture agreement in which the costs are shared 50/50 (See note 18). No exploration activity was undertaken in the period.
Nazas
The Nazas property is located approximately 64 km west of ECUs Velardeña property, within the municipality of Nazas, Durango State. The Company does not own the claims but is studying areas within the property under the terms of an agreement which will allow it to purchase the claims through a series of instalment payments at the Companys option.
Flechas
The Flechas project is located between the states of Durango and Zacatecas in the municipality of Santa Clara, Durango. It is located approximately 75.5 km southeast of the Companys Oxide Mill and 20 km northeast of the Santa Clara town. It consists of a block of four mining concessions covering 948.52 hectares. Agreements are in place with the surface owners to conduct exploration and mining operations.
Presentation
The prior years figures have been changed to correct for an error in the allocation of the cost of acquiring certain mineral concessions as between properties. The effect of the change is to increase the acquisition costs for the San Diego property by $205,080 and decrease the acquisition costs for the Velardeña property by $205,080. This change has no effect on the balance of mining properties in total.
Details of property, plant and equipment are as follows:
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
||||
|
|
Cost |
|
Accumulated
|
|
Net Book
|
|
Land |
|
201,979 |
|
|
|
201,979 |
|
Buildings |
|
4,459,460 |
|
841,028 |
|
3,618,432 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
1,758,587 |
|
864,826 |
|
893,761 |
|
Automotive |
|
1,347,187 |
|
899,950 |
|
447,237 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
15,033,767 |
|
3,908,555 |
|
11,125,212 |
|
Computer equipment |
|
370,833 |
|
281,098 |
|
89,735 |
|
Office equipment |
|
382,041 |
|
98,184 |
|
283,857 |
|
|
|
23,553,854 |
|
6,893,641 |
|
16,660,213 |
|
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
(in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
5. MINING PROPERTY COSTS AND PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (Continued)
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
||||
|
|
Cost |
|
Accumulated
|
|
Net Book
|
|
Land |
|
201,979 |
|
|
|
201,979 |
|
Buildings |
|
4,411,469 |
|
676,652 |
|
3,734,817 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
1,673,342 |
|
651,155 |
|
1,022,187 |
|
Automotive |
|
1,130,095 |
|
648,187 |
|
481,908 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
14,625,787 |
|
2,254,974 |
|
12,370,813 |
|
Computer equipment |
|
271,606 |
|
205,528 |
|
66,078 |
|
Office equipment |
|
303,396 |
|
66,289 |
|
237,107 |
|
|
|
22,617,674 |
|
4,502,785 |
|
18,114,889 |
|
6. CUSTOMER ADVANCES
The Company has made arrangements with the customer of its doré bars to provide financing in the form of advances prior to product delivery. The advances are denominated in US dollars and interest is charged at the rate of 18% per annum on outstanding balances. Both advance amounts and interest are settled at the time of sales invoice payment.
7. LONG-TERM DEBT
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Term loan |
|
16,528,801 |
|
17,466,087 |
|
less current portion |
|
(3,305,760 |
) |
(2,911,015 |
) |
|
|
13,223,041 |
|
14,555,072 |
|
Mineral concession liability |
|
1,813,364 |
|
3,567,999 |
|
less current portion |
|
(1,813,364 |
) |
(1,651,806 |
) |
|
|
|
|
1,916,193 |
|
Facilities loan |
|
39,955 |
|
55,735 |
|
less current portion |
|
(17,398 |
) |
(15,780 |
) |
|
|
22,557 |
|
39,955 |
|
|
|
13,245,598 |
|
16,511,220 |
|
Term loan
As at year end the Company owed $16,528,801 ($16,618,541 US dollars) on its term loan. An extension to the existing facility was signed during the year, the terms of which call for principal repayments in equal monthly instalments for 12 months commencing January 31, 2011. Interest is payable quarterly and is calculated at the greater of 12% and 1-month London Interbank Offered Rate plus 6%. The effective rate of interest on the loan is 12.8%. The loan is secured by a first mortgage covering certain of the current mining properties of the Companys Mexican subsidiaries, as well as the current and future facilities constructed thereon.
During the year the Company began negotiations with its lender to restructure the debt, and subsequent to year end, the restructuring was completed. Principal repayments under the amended facility are payable in thirty equal monthly payments commencing July 31, 2011 and ending December 31, 2013. The terms of interest payable under the restructured facility were unchanged. The statements reflect the effect of the restructuring which was to reduce the current portion of the debt from $16,528,801 to $3,305,760 and to increase working capital by $13,223,041.
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
(in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
7. LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued)
Mineral concession liability
|
|
Amount $ |
|
Balance December 31, 2009 |
|
3,567,999 |
|
Accretion interest |
|
499,368 |
|
Payments |
|
(2,331,600 |
) |
Unrealized translation loss |
|
77,597 |
|
Balance December 31, 2010 |
|
1,813,364 |
|
In the prior year, Company entered into contracts which terminated the legal actions related to title of four mineral concessions on the Velardeña property and settled the title matter. Under the terms of the contracts, the Company agreed to pay a total of $6,000,000 US dollars in a series of 6 payments of $1,000,000 US dollars, commencing May 19, 2009 and running semi-annually thereafter ending November 17, 2011, without interest. Under the terms of the contracts, a 30% interest in the title to the concessions will transfer to the counterparty should the Company fail to make the payments agreed there under.
The fair value of the debt at initial recognition was estimated using the discounted cash flow method. The debt is being accreted over the expected life of 2 1 / 2 years using the effective interest method at a rate of 15.5%.
Facilities loan
This loan carries interest at 10% and is repayable over a 5 year term in monthly payments of principal and interest of $1,698 and matures February 2013.
8. SHARE CAPITAL
Authorized:
Unlimited number of common shares without par value
Issued:
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||
|
|
Number |
|
Amount $ |
|
Number |
|
Amount $ |
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
290,340,733 |
|
132,275,566 |
|
242,609,557 |
|
111,597,713 |
|
Issued on deemed exercise of Special Warrants |
|
16,946,000 |
|
10,421,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issued during the year for cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prospectus financing |
|
|
|
|
|
25,000,000 |
|
11,900,000 |
|
Private placements |
|
|
|
|
|
7,717,600 |
|
3,380,949 |
|
Exercise of options |
|
300,000 |
|
240,000 |
|
2,025,000 |
|
759,375 |
|
Exercise of warrants |
|
650,000 |
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issued for the purchase of capital assets |
|
|
|
|
|
750,000 |
|
375,000 |
|
Issued on conversion of convertible debentures |
|
|
|
|
|
10,497,214 |
|
4,996,674 |
|
Issued on conversion of notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
1,141,362 |
|
543,288 |
|
Issued on settlement of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
600,000 |
|
323,820 |
|
Share issuance costs |
|
|
|
(1,400,006 |
) |
|
|
(2,139,903 |
) |
Transferred from contributed surplus, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exercise of options |
|
|
|
117,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
exercise of warrants |
|
|
|
108,300 |
|
|
|
538,650 |
|
Balance, end of year |
|
308,236,733 |
|
142,362,799 |
|
290,340,733 |
|
132,275,566 |
|
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
(in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
8. SHARE CAPITAL (Continued)
In the prior year, the Company completed an offering of 16,946,000 special warrants (the Special Warrants) to subscribers on a private placement basis at a price of $0.72 per Special Warrant for a total gross proceeds of $12,201,120. The net proceeds of the issue of $10,801,114 were reflected in a separate category in Shareholders Equity at December 31, 2009.
Effective January 27, 2010, following receipt of a short form prospectus filing, all the outstanding Special Warrants were deemed to be exercised, resulting in the issuance of 16,946,000 units (the Unit). Each Unit was comprised of one common share in the share capital of the Company and one-half of one warrant to purchase a common share in the share capital of the Company (each whole warrant, a Purchase Warrant). Each Purchase Warrant entitles the holder thereof to purchase one common share in the share capital of the Company at an exercise price of $0.90 per Purchase Warrant at any time before December 9, 2011. The gross proceeds of the Special Warrant offering were assigned on deemed conversion $10,421,790 to common shares and $1,779,330 to warrants. The fair value of the warrants was estimated on the date of the private placement based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate 1.0%, expected life 2 years, expected volatility 65%, and expected dividend yield 0%. The costs of the private placement issue have been reflected as share issuance costs.
In December 2010, the Company received proceeds for the exercise of the 300,000 stock options recorded. The related share issuance was completed by the Companys registrar in January 2011.
9. STOCK OPTIONS
Under the terms of the Companys stock option plan (the Plan) 14,252,398 Common Shares have been reserved for issuance. Options under the Plan are permitted to be granted to directors, officers, employees and consultants of the Company, provided that the maximum number of Common Shares which may be reserved for issuance to any one beneficiary in any 12 month period may not exceed 5% of the number of Common Shares then issued and outstanding or 2% in the case of a beneficiary who is conducting investor relations activities. The exercise price of options granted under the Plan is not permitted to be less than the closing price of the Common Shares on the day preceding the grant of the options, less any discount allowed by applicable securities legislation. Options granted pursuant to the Plan will have an exercise period of no more than 10 years, or such lesser period as may be permitted by applicable securities legislation.
During the year the Company granted 100,000 stock options with an estimated fair value of $34,974 to an officer of the Company. The Company reflected $26,230 of the fair value as mining property costs during the period with contributed surplus increased by the same amount. On November 15, 2010, 25,000 of the options were cancelled and as result the remainder of the fair value will not be recognized. The exercise price of the options granted was greater than the market price at the date of grant. The fair value of stock options issued was estimated at the grant date based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following weighted average assumptions:
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
2.3 |
% |
2.3 |
% |
Expected life (years) |
|
3.0 |
|
4.0 |
|
Expected volatility |
|
65 |
% |
66 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
nil |
|
nil |
|
Option pricing models including the Black-Scholes model require the input of highly subjective assumptions that can materially affect the fair value estimate and therefore do not necessarily provide a reliable measure of the fair value of the Companys stock options.
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
(in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
9. STOCK OPTIONS (Continued)
Changes during the year in common stock options outstanding are as follows:
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||
|
|
Number |
|
Weighted
|
|
Number |
|
Weighted
|
|
Options outstanding, beginning of year |
|
15,740,000 |
|
1.83 |
|
15,480,000 |
|
1.88 |
|
Granted |
|
100,000 |
|
0.80 |
|
3,120,000 |
|
0.80 |
|
Exercised |
|
(300,000 |
) |
0.80 |
|
(2,025,000 |
) |
0.38 |
|
Cancelled |
|
(175,000 |
) |
0.71 |
|
(835,000 |
) |
2.33 |
|
Options outstanding, end of year |
|
15,365,000 |
|
1.86 |
|
15,740,000 |
|
1.83 |
|
Options exercisable, end of year |
|
15,365,000 |
|
1.86 |
|
12,770,000 |
|
2.07 |
|
The following table summarizes information about the common stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2010:
Expiry Date |
|
Exercise
|
|
Number of
|
|
Number of
|
|
Weighted
|
|
February 28, 2011 |
|
0.80 |
|
75,000 |
|
75,000 |
|
0.2 |
|
March 1, 2011 |
|
1.00 |
|
1,905,000 |
|
1,905,000 |
|
0.2 |
|
September 23, 2011 |
|
1.59 |
|
600,000 |
|
600,000 |
|
0.7 |
|
December 21, 2011 |
|
3.00 |
|
2,000,000 |
|
2,000,000 |
|
1.0 |
|
October 10, 2012 |
|
2.40 |
|
5,115,000 |
|
5,115,000 |
|
1.8 |
|
November 19, 2012 |
|
2.40 |
|
150,000 |
|
150,000 |
|
1.9 |
|
July 25, 2013 |
|
1.70 |
|
2,850,000 |
|
2,850,000 |
|
2.6 |
|
October 22, 2014 |
|
0.80 |
|
2,670,000 |
|
2,670,000 |
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
1.86 |
|
15,365,000 |
|
15,365,000 |
|
1.9 |
|
10. WARRANTS
Changes during the year in share purchase warrants issued are as follows:
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||
|
|
Number |
|
Weighted
|
|
Number |
|
Weighted
|
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
42,487,426 |
|
0.92 |
|
9,045,250 |
|
2.85 |
|
Granted |
|
8,473,000 |
|
0.90 |
|
42,487,426 |
|
0.92 |
|
Exercised |
|
(650,000 |
) |
0.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
|
|
|
(9,045,250 |
) |
2.85 |
|
Balance, end of year |
|
50,310,426 |
|
0.92 |
|
42,487,426 |
|
0.92 |
|
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
(in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
10. WARRANTS (Continued)
The Company had the following share purchase warrants outstanding at December 31, 2010:
Expiry Date |
|
Exercise
|
|
Number of
|
|
Number of
|
|
Weighted
|
|
May 22, 2011 |
|
0.95 |
|
1,568,750 |
|
1,568,750 |
|
0.4 |
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
0.62 |
|
3,980,100 |
|
3,980,100 |
|
0.7 |
|
December 9, 2011 |
|
0.90 |
|
8,123,000 |
|
8,123,000 |
|
0.9 |
|
February 20, 2014 |
|
0.95 |
|
36,638,576 |
|
36,638,576 |
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
0.92 |
|
50,310,426 |
|
50,310,426 |
|
2.5 |
|
11. CONTRIBUTED SURPLUS
Changes in contributed surplus are as follows:
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
24,776,655 |
|
14,634,913 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
959,850 |
|
1,611,800 |
|
Purchase warrants issued on deemed conversion of Special Warrants |
|
1,779,330 |
|
|
|
Warrants issued in prospectus financing |
|
|
|
5,600,000 |
|
Warrants issued in private placements |
|
|
|
861,551 |
|
Warrants issued on conversion of convertible debentures |
|
|
|
2,351,376 |
|
Warrants issued on conversion of notes payable |
|
|
|
255,665 |
|
Transfer to share capital, exercised options |
|
(117,149 |
) |
(538,650 |
) |
Transfer to share capital, exercised warrants |
|
(108,300 |
) |
|
|
Balance, end of year |
|
27,290,386 |
|
24,776,655 |
|
12. COMMITMENTS
Operating leases
The Company is committed operating leases with annual payment requirements over the next five years as follows:
Year |
|
Amount
|
|
2011 |
|
142,272 |
|
2012 |
|
135,564 |
|
2013 |
|
22,676 |
|
2014 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
300,512 |
|
13. CONTINGENCIES
Intangible Asset
In January 2005, the Company acquired the rights to use a technology which is expected to increase material recuperation of current and future Mexican projects. At the time the agreement was reached the Company issued 500,000 common shares and the Company is
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
(in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
13. CONTINGENCIES (Continued)
bound to issue an additional 500,000 common shares should it choose to use the technology at a commercial scale. In addition, the agreement provides that the Company pay royalties of 1.5% of all production resulting from the application of the technology in Mexican properties. The technology was not employed in the current period.
Arbitration
During the year, the Company completed the arbitration hearing held pursuant to a Notice of Arbitration, received June 23, 2009 from Golden Tag wherein Golden Tag sought to refer certain matters, pertaining to the operation of the joint venture, to arbitration for resolution. On September 20, 2010 the Arbitration Panel rendered their conclusion in the matter. The Company finds the award of the arbitration panel (Arbitration Award) to be fair and has settled the matter with Golden Tag.
The conclusions reached in the Arbitration Award have resulted in an increase in the Velardeña mining property costs of $61,171 related to cost of material from the joint venture property processed in the Companys plant.
14. LOSS PER SHARE
The computations of basic and diluted loss per share are as follows:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
||
Loss for the period |
|
$ |
6,854,967 |
|
$ |
8,417,937 |
|
Basic weighted average number of common shares |
|
306,073,467 |
|
277,277,485 |
|
||
Dilutive potential from options and warrants |
|
1,287,500 |
|
645,422 |
|
||
Dilutive weighted average number of common shares |
|
307,360,967 |
|
277,922,907 |
|
||
Loss per share, basic and diluted |
|
$ |
0.022 |
|
$ |
0.030 |
|
15. EXPLANATORY NOTE FOR CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Within the grouping Investment Activities, the amount of $2,487,037, stated as the cash expenditure on mining property acquisition costs, includes an amount of $2,331,600 which reflects a cash expenditure made under the terms of the contracts described under Mineral concession liability in note 7.
16. MANAGEMENT OF CAPITAL
The Companys objectives in managing its capital resources are to ensure the entitys ability to continue as a going concern. The Company satisfies its capital requirements through careful management of its cash resources and by utilizing credit facilities or issuing equity, as necessary, based on the prevalent economic conditions of both the industry and the capital markets and the underlying risks characteristics of the related assets.
As at December 31, 2010, the Company had long-term debt of $16,618,541 US dollars, repayment of which was scheduled to commence January 31, 2011. In January 2011, the Company restructured the facility with its lender. Principal repayments under the amended facility are payable in thirty equal monthly payments commencing July 31, 2011 and ending December 31, 2013.
The Company is also obligated to semi-annual payments of $1,000,000 US dollars due under terms of a mineral concession agreement.
Based on current plans and estimates management believes that its operations can be funded through working capital, potential future credit facilities, and cash flow expected to be generated from the sale of products from its operations. As discussed note 1, the Company is dependent on its ability to raise the necessary capital to fund its operations and management can not provide assurance that it will ultimately be able to complete the required funding transactions. Furthermore, since we do not have proven and probable reserves we can not predict with confidence the level of cash flows that will be generated from the new mill. As such, we may need to either restructure our long term debt so that repayment requirements match the cash generation capability or raise additional equity in the alternate. Management can provide no guarantee that the Company will be successful in these transactions should they be required.
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
(in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
16. MANAGEMENT OF CAPITAL (Continued)
The Company is not subject to any externally imposed capital requirements and there has been no change with respect to the overall capital risk management strategy during the year.
17. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Companys financial instruments consist of the following:
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
||||
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Fair
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Fair
|
|
Financial Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-for-trading |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
344,826 |
|
344,826 |
|
7,647,023 |
|
7,647,023 |
|
Loans and receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
1,437,570 |
|
1,437,570 |
|
951,802 |
|
951,802 |
|
Advances and deposits |
|
187,912 |
|
187,912 |
|
112,195 |
|
112,195 |
|
Financial Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
3,600,407 |
|
3,600,407 |
|
4,360,474 |
|
4,360,474 |
|
Customer advances |
|
5,017,757 |
|
5,017,757 |
|
1,944,350 |
|
1,944,350 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
18,382,120 |
|
18,382,120 |
|
21,089,821 |
|
21,089,821 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents are recognized at their fair value and the fair value of all other financial instruments approximate their carrying values, either due to their short-term maturity or capacity of prompt liquidation or, in the case of long-term debt because the market rate of interest is paid. Cash and cash equivalents are held with large financial institutions.
The Company operates in Mexico and is exposed to currency risk in the normal course of business. Its sales and related accounts receivable are denominated in US dollars. A significant portion of its expenditures and related accounts payable are denominated in US dollars and Mexican pesos. The Companys long-term debt and customer advances are denominated in US dollars. A portion of its cash and cash equivalents are held in US dollars and Mexican pesos.
18. SAN DIEGO JOINT VENTURE
The Companys consolidated financial statements include the following amounts related to the San Diego Joint Venture:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Long term assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Mining property costs |
|
756,922 |
|
747,416 |
|
Cash flows resulting from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
Mining property costs |
|
(9,506 |
) |
(60,876 |
) |
ECUs share in the joint venture with Golden Tag Resources Ltd (Golden Tag) is 50% of the mining property costs incurred following the $1,500,000 US dollars earn in by Golden Tag. The share was capitalized under Mining Properties for a value in the current period of $10,563 less project management fees charged to Golden Tag of $1,057.
19. LOSS CARRY FORWARDS
These financial statements do not take into account the tax benefit arising from loss carry forwards which are available to the Company to reduce its income for tax purposes in future periods.
At December 31, 2010, the Company had non-capital loss carry forwards, available to offset future taxable income for Canadian tax purposes, aggregating $10,209,887 which expire over the period between 2014 and 2030.
At December 31, 2010, the Company had tax loss carry forwards, available to offset future taxable income in Mexico, aggregating $39,566,687 which expire between 2011 and 2020.
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
(in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
20. Amendment for disclosure of Material Differences between Canadian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
These consolidated financial statements have been amended to include a note to present the material differences between Canadian and United States generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
The Company prepares its consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP in Canada, which differ in certain respects from GAAP in the United States. The effect of the principal measurement differences between Canadian and U.S. GAAP are summarized as follows:
Consolidated summarized balance sheets:
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
||||||||
|
|
Footnote |
|
Canadian
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
U.S.
|
|
Canadian
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
U.S.
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
344,826 |
|
|
|
344,826 |
|
7,647,023 |
|
|
|
7,647,023 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, advances and deposits |
|
|
|
1,625,482 |
|
|
|
1,625,482 |
|
1,063,997 |
|
|
|
1,063,997 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
|
37,308 |
|
|
|
37,308 |
|
78,702 |
|
|
|
78,702 |
|
Mining property costs and property, plant and equipment |
|
a, b, c, d |
|
84,677,184 |
|
(34,510,137 |
) |
50,167,047 |
|
83,344,556 |
|
(31,954,796 |
) |
51,389,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
86,684,800 |
|
(34,510,137 |
) |
52,174,663 |
|
92,134,278 |
|
(31,954,796 |
) |
60,179,482 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
|
3,600,407 |
|
|
|
3,600,407 |
|
4,360,474 |
|
|
|
4,360,474 |
|
Customer advances |
|
|
|
5,017,757 |
|
|
|
5,017,757 |
|
1,944,350 |
|
|
|
1,944,350 |
|
Promissory notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
|
5,136,522 |
|
|
|
5,136,522 |
|
4,578,601 |
|
|
|
4,578,601 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
13,245,598 |
|
|
|
13,245,598 |
|
16,511,220 |
|
|
|
16,511,220 |
|
Convertible debenture |
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,000,284 |
|
|
|
27,000,284 |
|
27,394,645 |
|
|
|
27,394,645 |
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital |
|
|
|
142,362,799 |
|
|
|
142,362,799 |
|
132,275,566 |
|
|
|
132,275,566 |
|
Value assigned to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,801,114 |
|
|
|
10,801,114 |
|
Convertible debenture |
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributed surplus |
|
|
|
27,290,386 |
|
|
|
27,290,386 |
|
24,776,655 |
|
|
|
24,776,655 |
|
Retained earnings (deficit) |
|
a, b, c, d, e |
|
(109,968,669 |
) |
(34,510,137 |
) |
(144,478,806 |
) |
(103,113,702 |
) |
(31,954,796 |
) |
(135,068,498 |
) |
|
|
|
|
59,684,516 |
|
(34,510,137 |
) |
25,174,379 |
|
64,739,633 |
|
(31,954,796 |
) |
32,784,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
86,684,800 |
|
(34,510,137 |
) |
52,174,663 |
|
92,134,278 |
|
(31,954,796 |
) |
60,179,482 |
|
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
(in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
20. Amendment for disclosure of Material Differences between Canadian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (Continued)
Consolidated summarized statements of loss and other comprehensive loss:
|
|
Footnote |
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Loss in accordance with Canadian GAAP |
|
|
|
(6,854,967 |
) |
(8,417,937 |
) |
Mining property costs |
|
a |
|
(5,676,606 |
) |
(4,516,172 |
) |
Reversal of write-down |
|
b |
|
(2,045,613 |
) |
|
|
Other income |
|
c |
|
5,270,124 |
|
(808,337 |
) |
Stock-based compensation and stock options expense |
|
d |
|
(103,246 |
) |
(18,656 |
) |
Financing fees for convertible debentures |
|
e |
|
|
|
(22,603 |
) |
Accretion expense relating to convertible debentures |
|
e |
|
|
|
24,879 |
|
Loss in accordance with U.S. GAAP |
|
|
|
(9,410,308 |
) |
(13,758,826 |
) |
Total comprehensive loss in accordance with U.S. GAAP |
|
|
|
(9,410,308 |
) |
(13,758,826 |
) |
Weighted-average common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
306,073,467 |
|
277,277,485 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
307,360,967 |
|
277,922,907 |
|
Loss per share in accordance with U.S. GAAP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
(0.05 |
) |
Diluted |
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
(0.05 |
) |
Consolidated summarized statements of deficit:
|
|
Footnote |
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Deficit, end of year, pursuant to Canadian GAAP |
|
|
|
(109,968,669 |
) |
(103,113,702 |
) |
Opening US GAAP adjustments balance |
|
|
|
(31,954,796 |
) |
(26,613,907 |
) |
Mining property costs |
|
a |
|
(5,676,606 |
) |
(4,516,172 |
) |
Reversal of write-down |
|
b |
|
(2,045,613 |
) |
|
|
Other income |
|
c |
|
5,270,124 |
|
(808,337 |
) |
Stock-based compensation and stock options expense |
|
d |
|
(103,246 |
) |
(18,656 |
) |
Financing fees for convertible debentures |
|
e |
|
|
|
(22,603 |
) |
Accretion expense relating to convertible debentures |
|
e |
|
|
|
24,879 |
|
Deficit, end of year, pursuant to U.S. GAAP |
|
|
|
(144,478,806 |
) |
(135,068,498 |
) |
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
(in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
20. Amendment for disclosure of Material Differences between Canadian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (Continued)
Consolidated summarized statements of cash flows:
|
|
Footnote |
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Cash used in operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to Canadian GAAP |
|
|
|
(6,396,534 |
) |
(5,853,171 |
) |
Mining property costs |
|
f |
|
(5,676,606 |
) |
(4,516,172 |
) |
Reversal of write-down |
|
f |
|
(2,045,613 |
) |
|
|
Other income |
|
f |
|
5,270,124 |
|
(808,337 |
) |
Stock-based compensation and stock options expense |
|
f |
|
(103,246 |
) |
(18,656 |
) |
Pursuant to U.S. GAAP |
|
|
|
(8,951,875 |
) |
(11,196,336 |
) |
Cash generated by financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to Canadian GAAP |
|
|
|
824,220 |
|
31,298,081 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
g |
|
|
|
397,800 |
|
Pursuant to U.S. GAAP |
|
|
|
824,220 |
|
31,695,881 |
|
Cash used in investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to Canadian GAAP |
|
|
|
(1,735,626 |
) |
(18,674,177 |
) |
Mining property costs |
|
f |
|
5,676,606 |
|
4,516,172 |
|
Reversal of write-down |
|
f |
|
2,045,613 |
|
|
|
Other income |
|
f |
|
(5,270,124 |
) |
808,337 |
|
Stock-based compensation and stock options expense |
|
f |
|
103,246 |
|
18,656 |
|
Pursuant to U.S. GAAP |
|
|
|
819,715 |
|
(13,331,012 |
) |
Decrease in restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to Canadian GAAP |
|
|
|
|
|
397,800 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
g |
|
|
|
(397,800 |
) |
Pursuant to U.S. GAAP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to consolidated United States GAAP adjustments:
a. Mining property costs
Under Canadian GAAP, costs of acquiring mineral properties and related development expenditures are deferred. Exploration costs on mineral properties, other than acquisition costs, are deferred and capitalized under Canadian GAAP prior to the establishment of proven or probable reserves if they are considered to meet the definition of an asset. United States GAAP requires that all exploration costs be expensed.
b. Inventories
The Company has reflected its gold pyrite material-in-process inventory at a net realizable value of zero and, as such, recorded write-downs of inventory and an expense in the statement of loss. Under Canadian GAAP, the Company subsequently recorded a reversal of those write offs at the point where sales contracts for the related inventory were put in place. United States GAAP does not permit the reversal of previous write-downs of inventory.
c. Mining property costs classification in other income
Under Canadian GAAP, net revenue or expense derived from a mineral property prior to the production phase of a mine is capitalized and included in the cost of the asset. A United States GAAP adjustment arises because United States GAAP requires that all exploration related costs and associated revenues be expensed. Furthermore, United States GAAP requires that any incremental and direct costs associated with the sale of excavated saleable minerals during the development phase of the mine and prior to the production phase of the mine be classified as Other income and offset by the related amounts of proceeds from the sale
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
(in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
20. Amendment for disclosure of Material Differences between Canadian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (Continued)
of these minerals. Incremental and direct costs are those costs that would otherwise have not been incurred if not for the sale of these minerals.
d. Stock-based compensation and stock options
Under Canadian GAAP, stock-based compensation costs and stock option costs incurred during the exploration or development stage of the mineral properties are deferred and capitalized prior to the establishment of proven or probable reserves if they are considered to meet the definition of an asset. United States GAAP requires that all stock-based compensation costs and stock option costs be expensed.
e. Convertible debentures
Under Canadian GAAP, convertible debenture proceeds are allocated between their debt and equity component parts based on the relative fair values of the debt component and the embedded conversion feature. The debt component is accreted to the face value of the debentures with the resulting interest expense charged to operations. The costs of the financing are allocated on a proportional basis between the liability and equity portions based on their relative fair values with the liability portion of the costs expensed and the equity portion treated as a reduction of the gross proceeds allocated to the equity component. United States GAAP treats the convertible debenture solely as a liability since the embedded conversion feature does not meet US GAAP requirements for classification as an equity component. The liability is recorded at its full face value since the embedded conversion feature has no intrinsic value on a stand-alone basis and accordingly does not meet the requirements of an equity component under United States GAAP. United States GAAP requires that convertible debentures, net of issuance costs, be accreted to face value over the term ending on the first put date of the debentures which, in this case, is the issuance date of the debentures since the debentures are convertible on demand by the Unit holders. Thus, the debentures carrying value equals their face value on the balance sheet.
f. Mining property costs classification in statement of cash flow
United States GAAP requires that cash flows relating to mineral property exploration and land use costs be reported as operating activities. However, under Canadian GAAP mineral property exploration and land use costs are classified as investing activities.
g. Restricted cash
Under Canadian GAAP, restricted cash was disclosed as a separate line item in the statement of cash flows. United States GAAP requires that restricted cash be disclosed as a financing activity.
Other disclosures:
The following additional information would be presented if these consolidated financial statements were presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP:
i. Auditors Report: Emphasis of matter paragraph
In the United States, reporting standards for auditors require the addition of an explanatory paragraph (following the opinion paragraph) when the financial statements are affected by conditions and events that cast substantial doubt on the Companys ability to continue as a going concern, such as those described in Note 1 to the financial statements. Canadian reporting standards do not permit a reference to such events and conditions in the auditors report when these are adequately disclosed in the financial statements. The Auditor draws attention to Note 1 to the financial statements, which describes certain conditions that give rise to substantial doubt about the entitys ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. The Auditors opinion is not qualified in respect of this matter.
ii. Joint Venture
San Diego Joint Venture has been recorded under Canadian GAAP on a proportionate basis whereas under United States GAAP, investments in incorporated joint ventures should be accounted for using the equity method. However, the Company
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
(in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
20. Amendment for disclosure of Material Differences between Canadian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (Continued)
has elected to use the accommodation of the SEC whereby the accounting for joint ventures need not be reconciled from Canadian GAAP to United States GAAP since the different accounting treatment affects only the presentation and classification of financial statement items and not net income or shareholders equity.
iii. Accounts receivable
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Value added tax recoverable |
|
1,077,878 |
|
661,311 |
|
Trade receivables |
|
357,320 |
|
125,171 |
|
Other receivables |
|
190,284 |
|
277,515 |
|
|
|
1,625,482 |
|
1,063,997 |
|
iv. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Canadian tax purposes |
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance |
|
8,358,927 |
|
5,692,955 |
|
Increases based on tax positions related to the current year |
|
1,850,960 |
|
2,665,972 |
|
|
|
10,209,887 |
|
8,358,927 |
|
Mexican tax purposes |
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance |
|
45,026,853 |
|
32,343,850 |
|
Increases (decrease) based on tax positions related to the current year |
|
(5,460,166 |
) |
12,683,003 |
|
|
|
39,566,687 |
|
45,026,853 |
|
v. Income tax uncertainty
The Company and its subsidiaries file federal income tax returns in Canada and Mexico; the Companys Mexican subsidiaries also file Mexican state tax returns where required by law. With few exceptions, the Company and its Mexican subsidiaries are subject to Canadian federal or Mexican federal, state and local examinations by the tax authorities for a minimum of four years in arrearage to the extent that the Company receives a notice of assessment from the respective competent authorities.
vi. Deferred income tax
Canadian GAAP financial statements do not take into account the tax benefit arising from loss carry forwards which are available to the Company to reduce its income for tax purposes in future periods so that no deferred income tax has been recorded in the Canadian GAAP financial statements. Deferred tax assets are not recognized for the tax benefit arising from loss carry forwards to the extent that it is not probable that taxable profits will be available against which these loss carry forwards can be utilized in the future. The Company has disclosed its non-capital loss carry forwards and tax loss carry forwards as at December 31, 2010 in Note 19, Loss carry forwards to these consolidated financial statements. Therefore, consistent with the current Canadian GAAP accounting treatment, no deferred income tax consequences have been recorded under United States GAAP relating to US GAAP adjustments recorded in the reconciliations forthwith.
Managements Report on Responsibility
The preparation and presentation of the accompanying amended consolidated financial statements is the responsibility of the Companys management. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles and reflect managements best estimates and judgement.
Management, under the supervision of and the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have a process in place to evaluate disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting as required by Canadian securities regulators.
The Board of Directors is responsible for ensuring that management fulfils its responsibilities for financial reporting and is responsible for reviewing and approving the consolidated financial statements. The Audit Committee reviews the results of the audit and the consolidated financial statements and submits its findings to the Board of Directors for their consideration when approving the consolidated financial statements.
The amended consolidated financial statements as at December 31, 2009 and 2008 and for the years then ended have been audited by Guimond Lavallée Inc., Chartered Accountants, and their report outlines the scope of their examination and gives their opinion on the amended audited consolidated financial statements.
Signed MICHEL ROY |
|
Signed DWIGHT WALKER |
|
|
|
Michel Roy |
|
Dwight Walker |
Chief Executive Officer |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
July 11, 2011
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (United States) and Canadian securities regulations, for ECU Silver Mining Inc. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Due to its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis. Also, projections of the effectiveness of internal control are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to the financial statement preparation and presentation.
Management carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009. The framework on which such evaluation was based is contained in the report entitled Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). This evaluation included review of the documentation of controls, evaluation of the design effectiveness of controls, testing of the operating effectiveness of controls and a conclusion on this evaluation. Although there are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system of internal control over financial reporting, based on this evaluation, management has concluded that the system of internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2009.
Guimond Lavallée Inc, our independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting at ECU Silver Mining Inc. as at December 31, 2009, which is presented hereinafter.
Signed MICHEL ROY |
|
Signed DWIGHT WALKER |
|
|
|
Michel Roy |
|
Dwight Walker |
Chief Executive Officer |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
Independent Auditors Report
To the Shareholders of ECU Silver Mining Inc.,
We have completed an integrated audit of ECU Silver Mining Inc. (the Company) 2009 and 2008 consolidated financial statements and of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009. Our opinions, based on our audits, are presented below.
Consolidated Financial statements
We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of ECU Silver Mining Inc. as at December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the consolidated statements of loss, comprehensive loss and deficit, and cash flows for the years then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits of the Companys consolidated financial statements in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit of consolidated financial statements includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. A consolidated financial statements audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, these amended consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as at December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.
Without modifying our opinion, the consolidated financial statements for the years December 31, 2009 and 2008 have been amended as disclosed in note 24 to the consolidated financial statements. Our report dated March 30, 2010 on the previously issued consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 has been amended as such.
Internal control over financial reporting
We have also audited the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on the criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Companys management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Managements report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. An audit of internal control over financial reporting includes obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on assessed risk and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
The Companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A Companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on the criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Guimond Lavallée Inc.
Chartered Accountants
Brossard, Quebec
March 30, 2010 except as to note 24 which is at July 11, 2011.
(1) Chartered Accountants auditor permit No. 23358
ECU Silver Mining Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
as at December 31, 2009 and 2008
(in Canadian dollars) |
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
7,647,023 |
|
538,215 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
|
398,385 |
|
Accounts receivable, advances and deposits (Note 4) |
|
1,063,997 |
|
1,654,764 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
78,702 |
|
53,223 |
|
|
|
8,789,722 |
|
2,644,587 |
|
Mining property costs and property, plant and equipment ( Note 6) |
|
83,344,556 |
|
60,952,247 |
|
|
|
92,134,278 |
|
63,596,834 |
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
4,360,474 |
|
5,323,049 |
|
Customer advances (Note 7) |
|
1,944,350 |
|
|
|
Promissory notes payable (Note 8) |
|
|
|
1,521,752 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt (Note 9) |
|
4,578,601 |
|
3,059,313 |
|
|
|
10,883,425 |
|
9,904,114 |
|
Long-term debt (Note 9) |
|
16,511,220 |
|
15,280,736 |
|
Convertible debentures (Note 10) |
|
|
|
5,128,708 |
|
|
|
27,394,645 |
|
30,313,558 |
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital ( Notes 11, 12, 13 and 14) |
|
132,275,566 |
|
111,597,713 |
|
Special warrants (Note 12) |
|
10,801,114 |
|
|
|
Equity component of convertible debentures (Note 10) |
|
|
|
869,014 |
|
Contributed surplus (Note 15) |
|
24,776,655 |
|
14,634,913 |
|
Deficit |
|
(103,113,702 |
) |
(93,818,364 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,739,633 |
|
33,283,276 |
|
|
|
92,134,278 |
|
63,596,834 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 16 and 17)
Approved by the Board of Directors:
Signed MICHEL ROY |
|
Signed TALAL CHEHAB |
Director |
|
Director |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF LOSS, COMPREHENSIVE LOSS AND DEFICIT
for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
(in Canadian dollars) |
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
General and administration Mexico |
|
4,376,844 |
|
3,721,022 |
|
General and administration Canada |
|
1,505,568 |
|
1,583,294 |
|
Stock based compensation |
|
1,572,144 |
|
3,922,655 |
|
Depreciation |
|
182,679 |
|
148,054 |
|
Interest income |
|
(57,311 |
) |
(103,623 |
) |
Interest and bank charges |
|
762,111 |
|
246,075 |
|
Interest on long term debt |
|
2,752,648 |
|
2,627,347 |
|
Financing fees for convertible debentures |
|
|
|
302,982 |
|
Foreign exchange (gain) loss |
|
(3,520,810 |
) |
3,525,156 |
|
Provision for loan loss |
|
|
|
1,242,934 |
|
Write-down of inventory (Note 5) |
|
844,064 |
|
827,384 |
|
|
|
8,417,937 |
|
18,043,280 |
|
Loss and Comprehensive Loss for the year |
|
(8,417,937 |
) |
(18,043,280 |
) |
Deficit, beginning of year |
|
(93,818,364 |
) |
(75,775,084 |
) |
Conversion of convertible debentures |
|
(877,401 |
) |
|
|
Deficit, end of year |
|
(103,113,702 |
) |
(93,818,364 |
) |
Loss per share (Note 18) |
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share |
|
(0.03 |
) |
(0.07 |
) |
Weighted average number of shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
277,277,485 |
|
242,609,557 |
|
Diluted |
|
277,922,907 |
|
243,790,807 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
(in Canadian dollars) |
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss for the period |
|
(8,417,937 |
) |
(18,043,280 |
) |
Items not affecting cash |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
182,679 |
|
148,054 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
1,572,144 |
|
3,922,655 |
|
Write-down of inventory |
|
844,064 |
|
827,384 |
|
Unrealized foreign exchange loss (gain) |
|
(2,965,937 |
) |
2,675,183 |
|
Accretion interest |
|
475,905 |
|
52,875 |
|
Loss (gain) on disposal of capital asset |
|
(453 |
) |
16,688 |
|
Provision for loan loss |
|
|
|
1,242,934 |
|
Changes in non cash working capital items |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
590,767 |
|
479,492 |
|
Inventory |
|
(844,064 |
) |
(827,384 |
) |
Prepaid expenses |
|
(25,479 |
) |
(82,842 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
790,790 |
|
3,351,433 |
|
Customer advances |
|
1,944,350 |
|
|
|
Cash used in operating activities |
|
(5,853,171 |
) |
(6,236,808 |
) |
INVESTMENT ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
Mining property deferred costs & supplies |
|
(10,555,086 |
) |
(11,197,499 |
) |
Revenues offset to mining property costs |
|
6,577,167 |
|
709,486 |
|
Mining property acquisition costs (Note 19) |
|
(3,428,880 |
) |
|
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |
|
(11,267,378 |
) |
(1,533,804 |
) |
Cash used in investing activities |
|
(18,674,177 |
) |
(12,021,817 |
) |
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares and warrants issued for cash, net |
|
31,163,086 |
|
(4,869 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in prommisory notes payable |
|
(783,166 |
) |
1,534,033 |
|
Increase in long term debt (Note 19) |
|
918,161 |
|
3,139,649 |
|
Proceeds from convertible debentures |
|
|
|
6,000,000 |
|
Financing costs related to the equity component of convertible debentures |
|
|
|
(55,153 |
) |
Cash generated by financing activities |
|
31,298,081 |
|
10,613,660 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
(59,725 |
) |
(27,597 |
) |
Decrease (Increase) in restricted Cash |
|
397,800 |
|
(435,150 |
) |
Increase (Decrease) in cash and cash equivalents during the year |
|
7,108,808 |
|
(8,107,712 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
|
538,215 |
|
8,645,927 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year |
|
7,647,023 |
|
538,215 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
(in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
1. NATURE OF ACTIVITIES
ECU Silver Mining Inc. (ECU, or the Company) is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of mining properties in Mexico that are mainly gold-bearing and silver-bearing. The Company has earned revenues from its exploration and development activities and is considered to be in the development stage. It has not yet determined whether a sufficient proportion of its mineral resources are economically exploitable and, accordingly, has not yet determined whether the mining properties contain economic mineral reserves.
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes that the company will, in the ordinary course of business, be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities. The recoverability of the accumulated costs shown for mining properties and related deferred costs is dependent upon the existence of economically recoverable reserves, future profitable production, and on the Companys ability to obtain the necessary financing to fund its operations.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles. The significant accounting policies followed by the Company are summarized as follows:
a) Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and those of its subsidiaries, all owned by ECU, BLM Minera Mexicana S.A de C.V., Minera William S.A de C.V., and Minera Labri S.A. de C.V., and on a proportionate basis, the accounts of the San Diego Joint Venture. All inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated.
b) Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated financial statements. Significant areas where managements judgement has been applied include; the useful life of capital assets, the estimated net realizable value of inventory, asset impairment, stock-based compensation, and future income tax assets and liabilities. While management believes that these estimates and assumptions are reasonable, actual results could vary significantly.
c) Revenue recognition
Revenue is recognized upon delivery when title and risk of ownership of metal and metal bearing concentrates passes to the buyer and when collection is reasonably assured. The contained metal in the concentrates shipped is assayed and the appropriate negotiated amount of recoverable metal contained therein is recorded as revenue based on the then current market rate of the metals. The concentrates are sold under contracts that provide for final prices to be determined by quoted market prices in a period subsequent to the date of the sale. Variations from the provisionally priced sales are recognized as revenue adjustments in the period they occur.
As the Company is in the development stage, all revenues are offset against mining properties and deferred exploration costs in accordance with the recommendations of the Emerging Issues Committee, EIC 27 Revenues and Expenditures During the Pre-operating Period.
d) Foreign Exchange
The Canadian dollar is the functional currency of the Company. The Company uses the temporal method to translate its foreign currency transactions, including its integrated foreign subsidiaries. Monetary assets and liabilities are translated at the rate of exchange in effect at period-end. Other assets and liabilities are translated at their historic rates. Items appearing in the income statement, except for depreciation translated at historic rates, are translated at average year rates. Exchange gains and losses are included in the income statement.
e) Cash and cash equivalents
The Companys policy is to present cash and temporary investments having a term of three months or less from the acquisition date with cash and cash equivalents.
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
(in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
f) Inventory
Materials-in-process (concentrates) are valued at lower of average production cost and net realizable value.
g) Mining Properties, and Deferred Exploration and Development Expenses
The amounts recorded as mining properties and deferred exploration costs represent exploration, development and associated operating costs incurred to date and are not intended to reflect present or future values. These costs are deferred until the discovery of economically exploitable reserves and the start-up of the production phase on a property-by-property basis or until the property is abandoned. Mining properties are abandoned when management allows property interests to lapse or when they determine that properties are not economically viable. Costs accumulated relating to projects that are abandoned are written-off in the year in which a decision to discontinue the project is made.
When it has been determined that a mining property can be economically developed as a result of establishing proven and probable reserves, costs incurred prospectively to develop the property are capitalized as incurred and are amortized using the units-of-production method over the estimated life of the ore body based upon recoverable ounces to be mined from estimated proven and probable reserves.
The Company is in the development stage and by definition commercial production has not yet commenced. Commercial production occurs when an asset or property is substantially complete, is fully permitted and ready for its intended use. No amortization of mining properties has been charged in these financial statements.
On a periodic basis, senior management reviews the carrying values of mining properties and deferred exploration expenditures with a view to assessing whether there has been any impairment in value. In the event that it is determined there is an impairment in the carrying value of any property, the carrying value will be written down or written off, as appropriate. There was no impairment write-down required at December 31, 2009.
Supplies and spare parts are valued at the lower of average cost and replacement cost.
h) Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided for plant and equipment on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets and deferred to mining properties or charged to expense as appropriate. The following estimated useful lives are being used:
Buildings |
|
20 years |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
2 or 8 years |
|
Automotive |
|
4 years |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
10 years |
|
Computer equipment |
|
3 1 / 3 years |
|
Office equipment |
|
10 years |
|
i) Asset retirement obligations
The Company records the present value of its legal obligations associated with the asset retirement when the liability is incurred. The corresponding amount is capitalized as part of the related mining property`s carrying value. While the associated mining property is in the pre-production stage, the liability is accreted over time through periodic charges to mining property costs. In each subsequent period, the carrying amounts of the asset and the liability are adjusted for changes to the Companys estimate of future cash flows associated with the retirement obligations.
Management estimates that the current present value of legal obligations for asset retirement is de minimis.
j) Income and Mining Taxes
The Company uses the liability method to account for income taxes. Under this method of Section 3465, future tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Future tax assets and liabilities are measured by using
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
(in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
enacted or substantively enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years during which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under Section 3465, the effect on future tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
k) Basic and Diluted Loss per Share
The basic loss per share is calculated using the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. We follow the treasury stock method in calculating diluted earnings per share. Under this method, the weighted average number of shares includes the potentially dilutive effects of the conversion of in-the-money stock options and warrants into common shares. The effect of potential issuances of shares under options and warrants would be anti-dilutive when a loss is reported, and therefore basic and diluted losses per share are the same.
l) Stock-based compensation
Stock options granted to employees and non-employees are accounted for using the fair value method. Under this method, the compensation cost is measured as at the date of the grant by applying the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The determined fair value is recognized as a cost over the vesting period with a corresponding increase to contributed surplus. On the exercise of stock options, consideration paid and the associated contributed surplus is credited to common shares.
m) Financial Instruments
All financial assets and financial liabilities are classified as either: held-for-trading, available-for-sale, held-to-maturity, loans-and-receivables or other liabilities. Financial assets classified as held-for-trading or available-for-sale, are measured at fair value. Held-to-maturity, and loans-and-receivables are measured initially at fair value then at amortized cost over their term. Financial liabilities are measured at their fair value when they are classified as held-for-trading otherwise they are measured at amortized cost over their term. Initial differences between fair value and maturity value are amortized using the effective interest method.
Holding gains and losses from available-for-sale assets are included in other comprehensive income until realized at which time they are transferred to net income (loss).
Transaction costs such as arrangement and advance fees charged by the Companys principal lender in connection with long term debt are expensed at the time they are incurred.
3. ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the following new accounting standards issued by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants:
(i) Section 3064, Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The standard reinforces the principle-based approach to the recognition of assets only in accordance with the definition of an asset and the criteria for asset recognition; and clarifies the application of the concept of matching revenues and expenses such that the current practice of recognizing assets that may not meet the definition and recognition criteria are eliminated. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
(ii) EIC-173, Credit Risk and the Fair Value of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
The standard provides guidance on how to take into account credit risk of an entity and counterparty when determining the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities, including derivative instruments. Adoption of this Abstract did not have any effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
(iii) EIC-174, Impairment Testing of Mineral Exploration Properties
This standard recommends the analysis be performed to determine if there has been an impairment of mineral exploration properties. The Company implemented the recommendations discussed in this Abstract when testing for impairment of mineral
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
(in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
3. ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
exploration properties in the period. Adoption of this standard did not have any effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
(iv) Section 3862, Amendment to Financial Instruments Disclosures
This section was amended to improve financial instrument disclosures to include additional disclosure requirements about fair value measurement for financial instruments and liquidity risk disclosures. The impact of adopting these amendments for the year ended December 31, 2009 did not result in additional disclosures included within these consolidated financial statements.
4. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, ADVANCES AND DEPOSITS
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Trade receivables |
|
125,171 |
|
51,937 |
|
Expenses recoverable from Joint Venture partner |
|
165,320 |
|
70,649 |
|
Value added taxes recoverable |
|
661,311 |
|
1,457,646 |
|
Deposits and advances |
|
112,195 |
|
74,532 |
|
|
|
1,063,997 |
|
1,654,764 |
|
5. INVENTORY
The Company has reflected its gold pyrite material-in-process inventory at a net realizable value of zero. As such, it has recorded a write-down of inventory of $844,064 ($827,384 2008). Management believes that it can optimize the value of the gold pyrite material with further treatment of the material. The method we intend to use for further processing has been determined and the equipment and infrastructure for doing so is in place. We are currently in the process of testing the consistency of the equipment and running batch treatment tests of the gold/pyrite material. We are also evaluating and considering a sales contract for the processed material. The inventory will be reflected at a net realizable value of zero until such time as the processing method has been proven and the sales contracts are in place.
6. MINING PROPERTY COSTS AND PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
||||
|
|
Cost |
|
Accumulated
|
|
Net Book Value |
|
Net Book Value |
|
Mining properties |
|
64,693,133 |
|
|
|
64,693,133 |
|
52,414,384 |
|
Land, buildings and equipment |
|
22,617,674 |
|
4,502,785 |
|
18,114,889 |
|
8,420,396 |
|
|
|
87,310,807 |
|
4,502,785 |
|
82,808,022 |
|
60,834,780 |
|
Supplies and spare parts |
|
|
|
|
|
536,534 |
|
117,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,344,556 |
|
60,952,247 |
|
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
(in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
6. MINING PROPERTY COSTS AND PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (Continued)
Expenditures on mining properties are as follows:
|
|
2009
|
|
||||
|
|
Acquisition Cost |
|
Deferred Costs |
|
Total Cost |
|
Velardeña |
|
32,061,217 |
|
28,287,967 |
|
60,349,184 |
|
Chicago |
|
624,721 |
|
2,735,948 |
|
3,360,669 |
|
San Diego |
|
52,399 |
|
930,881 |
|
983,280 |
|
|
|
32,738,337 |
|
31,954,796 |
|
64,693,133 |
|
|
|
2008
|
|
||||
|
|
Acquisition Cost |
|
Deferred Costs |
|
Total Cost |
|
Velardeña |
|
25,125,635 |
|
23,197,160 |
|
48,322,795 |
|
Chicago |
|
624,721 |
|
2,544,464 |
|
3,169,185 |
|
San Diego |
|
52,399 |
|
870,005 |
|
922,404 |
|
|
|
25,802,755 |
|
26,611,629 |
|
52,414,384 |
|
Velardeña
(i) The Velardeña property is located in the Velardeña mining district, within the municipality of Cuencamé, in the northeast quadrant of the State of Durango, Mexico. The property is situated approximately 95 km southwest of the city of Torreón in the State of Coahuila and 140 km northeast of the city of Durango, capital of the State of Durango. The property consists of 20 contiguous mineral concessions totalling 233.2 hectares. In May 2009 the Company entered into contracts which terminated the legal actions related to the four mineral concessions on the Velardeña property and settled the title matter. See note 9.
(ii) The Company is actively mining on the property and processing the mined material at the oxide mill acquired during in the second quarter of the year. The doré bars that are generated are being sold. The Company has also been processing stockpiles of mineralized material through its flotation mill situated near the town of Velardeña. Deferred costs for the Velardeña property have been offset by the related revenues. During the year the total of such revenues was $6,577,167 ($709,486 2008). The cumulative amount of such revenues for the Velardeña property is $18,078,310 ($11,501,143 2008).
Chicago
(iii) The Chicago property is located approximately 2 km south of the Velardeña property. The property consists of 8 contiguous mineral concessions totalling 315.88 hectares. The Company has full title to the claims. No exploration activity was undertaken in the period.
San Diego
(iv) The San Diego property is located 9 km northeast of ECUs Velardeña property. It is comprised of 4 contiguous mineral concessions totalling an area of 91.65 hectares and is being explored under the terms of a joint venture agreement in which the costs are shared 50/50. No exploration activity was undertaken in the period.
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
(in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
6. MINING PROPERTY COSTS AND PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (Continued)
Details of property, plant and equipment are as follows:
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
||||
|
|
Cost |
|
Accumulated
|
|
Net Book Value |
|
Net Book
|
|
Land |
|
201,979 |
|
|
|
201,979 |
|
201,979 |
|
Buildings |
|
4,411,469 |
|
676,652 |
|
3,734,817 |
|
1,541,339 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
1,673,342 |
|
651,155 |
|
1,022,187 |
|
1,298,134 |
|
Automotive |
|
1,130,095 |
|
648,187 |
|
481,908 |
|
523,054 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
14,625,787 |
|
2,254,974 |
|
12,370,813 |
|
4,520,809 |
|
Computer equipment |
|
271,606 |
|
205,528 |
|
66,078 |
|
90,511 |
|
Office equipment |
|
303,396 |
|
66,289 |
|
237,107 |
|
244,570 |
|
|
|
22,617,674 |
|
4,502,785 |
|
18,114,889 |
|
8,420,396 |
|
7. CUSTOMER ADVANCES
The Company has made arrangements with the customer of its doré bars to provide financing in the form of advances prior to product delivery. Interest is charged at the rate of 18% per annum on outstanding balances and both advance amounts and interest are settled at the time of sales invoice payment.
8. PROMISSORY NOTES PAYABLE
Promissory notes were settled during the year. US$271,800 and $412,500 of principal amount of notes payable and accrued interest, together totalling $798,953 were converted into 1,141,362 shares and 1,141,362 warrants on the same basis as the prospectus offering. The fair value of the note payable was equal to the book value at the time of conversion.
9. LONG-TERM DEBT
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Term loan |
|
17,466,087 |
|
18,270,000 |
|
less current portion |
|
(2,911,015 |
) |
(3,045,000 |
) |
|
|
14,555,072 |
|
15,225,000 |
|
Mineral concession liability |
|
3,567,999 |
|
|
|
less current portion |
|
(1,651,806 |
) |
|
|
|
|
1,916,193 |
|
|
|
Facilities loan |
|
55,735 |
|
70,049 |
|
less current portion |
|
(15,780 |
) |
(14,313 |
) |
|
|
39,955 |
|
55,736 |
|
|
|
16,511,220 |
|
15,280,736 |
|
Term loan
In August 2009 the Company restructured its long term debt facilities with its principal lender. The amount outstanding at the time of the restructuring of $15,750,000 US Dollars, together with an additional amount of $868,541 US Dollars representing interest due, were consolidated into a new loan of $16,618,541 US Dollars. As at year end the Company owed $17,466,087 ($16,618,541 US Dollars). No principal repayment is required until November 30, 2010 following which principal will be repayable in equal monthly instalments for 12 months. Interest is payable quarterly and is calculated at the greater of 12% and 1-month London Interbank Offered Rate plus 6%. The effective rate of interest on the loan is 12.8%. The loan is secured by a first mortgage covering certain of the current mining properties of the Companys Mexican subsidiaries, as well as the current and future facilities constructed thereon.
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
(in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
9. LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued)
Mineral concession liability
|
|
Amount
|
|
Principal amount of debt |
|
6,994,800 |
|
Discount amortized through accretion expense |
|
(1,156,498 |
) |
Fair value of debt at initial recognition |
|
5,838,302 |
|
Accretion expense |
|
451,027 |
|
Payments |
|
(2,331,600 |
) |
Unrealized translation gain |
|
(389,730 |
) |
Balance December 31, 2009 |
|
3,567,999 |
|
On May 11, 2009 the Company entered into contracts which terminated the legal actions related to title of four mineral concessions on the Velardeña property and settled the title matter. Under the terms of the contracts, the Company agreed to pay a total of USD$6,000,000 in a series of 6 payments of USD$1,000,000, commencing May 19, 2009 and running semi-annually thereafter ending November 17, 2011, without interest. Under the terms of the contracts, a 30% interest in the title to the concessions will transfer to the counterparty should the Company fail to make the payments agreed there under.
The fair value of the debt at initial recognition was estimated using the discounted cash flow method. The debt is being accreted over the expected life of 2 1 / 2 years using the effective interest method at a rate of 15.5%.
Facilities loan
This $75,000 loan was advanced in connection with expenditures made for leasehold improvements at the Companys Toronto offices. It carries interest at 10% and is repayable over a 5 year term in monthly payments of principal and interest of $1,698 and matures February 2013.
10. CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Convertible debentures debt component: |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
5,444,325 |
|
|
|
Issuance |
|
|
|
5,075,833 |
|
Accretion expense |
|
24,879 |
|
52,875 |
|
Interest accrued |
|
132,431 |
|
315,617 |
|
Retired on conversion to shares and warrants |
|
(5,601,635 |
) |
|
|
Balance, end of year |
|
|
|
5,444,325 |
|
Presentation: |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
|
315,617 |
|
Convertible debentures |
|
|
|
5,128,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
5,444,325 |
|
In March 2009 the Company reached agreements with the holders of its outstanding 12% convertible debentures maturing on July 31, 2013 (the Debentures) to convert the aggregate principal amount of the Debentures, being $6,000,000, as well as the accrued and unpaid interest thereon and all associated prepayment premiums, amounting to $7,348,050 in total, into common shares (Common Shares) and warrants to purchase Common Shares (Warrants). Under the terms of the debt conversions the Company issued 10,497,214 Common Shares and Warrants in full repayment of the Debentures. The Common Shares and Warrants were issued on the basis of one Common Share and one Warrant for each $0.70 of indebtedness, being the identical price at which the Company issued Common Shares and Warrants pursuant to its short form prospectus offering which closed on February 20, 2009. Each Warrant entitles its holder to acquire one Common Share at a price of $0.95 at any time on or before February 20, 2014.
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
(in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
10. CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES (Continued)
The fair value of the debt portion of the Debentures at the time of conversion was estimated using the discounted cash flow method and determined to be equal to their book value. The fair value of the equity portion was estimated using the residual value method and a charge to deficit of $877,401 was recorded.
11. SHARE CAPITAL
Authorized:
Unlimited number of common shares without par value
Issued:
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||||
|
|
Number |
|
Amount
|
|
Number |
|
Amount
|
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
242,609,557 |
|
111,597,713 |
|
242,609,557 |
|
111,602,582 |
|
Issued during the year for cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prospectus financing(i) |
|
25,000,000 |
|
11,900,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Private placements(ii),(iii) |
|
7,717,600 |
|
3,380,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of options |
|
2,025,000 |
|
759,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issued for the purchase of capital assets |
|
750,000 |
|
375,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issued on conversion of convertible debentures (Note 10) |
|
10,497,214 |
|
4,996,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issued on conversion of notes payable (Note 8) |
|
1,141,362 |
|
543,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issued on settlement of debt(iv) |
|
600,000 |
|
323,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
Share issuance costs |
|
|
|
(2,139,903 |
) |
|
|
(4,869 |
) |
Transferred from contributed surplus, exercise of options |
|
|
|
538,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year |
|
290,340,733 |
|
132,275,566 |
|
242,609,557 |
|
111,597,713 |
|
(i) In February 2009 the Company completed an offering of 25,000,000 subscription receipts at a purchase price of $0.70 per subscription receipt, for an aggregate gross proceeds of $17,500,000. In connection with the offering the Company issued to the subscribers 25,000,000 common shares and 25,000,000 common share purchase warrants. Each warrant entitles its holder to acquire one additional common share at a price of $0.95 per share at any time until February 20, 2014. The gross proceeds of the offering were assigned $11,900,000 to common shares and $5,600,000 to warrants. The fair value of the warrants was estimated on the issued date based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate 1.55%, expected life 3 years, expected volatility 60%, and expected dividend yield 0%.
(ii) In May 2009 the Company issued 3,737,500 private placement units consisting of 3,737,500 common shares and 1,868,750 share purchase warrants at an issue price of $0.60 per unit. Each share purchase warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share of the Company for $0.95 until May 22, 2011. The gross proceeds of the units were assigned $2,025,725 to common shares and $216,775 to warrants. The fair value of the warrants was estimated on the issued date based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate 0.90%, expected life 2 years, expected volatility 60%, and expected dividend yield 0%.
(iii) In September 2009 the Company issued 3,980,100 private placement units consisting of 3,980,100 common shares and 3,980,100 share purchase warrants at an issue price of $0.5025 per unit. Each share purchase warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share of the Company for $0.62 until September 30, 2011. The gross proceeds of the units were assigned $1,355,224 to common shares and $644,776 to warrants. The fair value of the warrants was estimated on the issued date based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate 1.30%, expected life 2 years, expected volatility 70%, and expected dividend yield 0%.
(iv) In October 2009 the Company issued 600,000 common shares at a price of $0.5397 per share in settlement of a debt of $323,800.
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
(in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
12. SPECIAL WARRANTS
On December 9, 2009 (the Closing Date), the Company issued 16,946,000 special warrants (the Special Warrants) to subscribers (Subscribers) on a private placement basis at a price of $0.72 per Special Warrant (the Private Placement) for a total gross proceeds of $12,201,120. The net proceeds of the issue of $10,801,114 have been assigned to a separate category in Shareholders Equity.
Each Special Warrant entitles the holder thereof to receive, without the payment of additional consideration, one unit (the Unit) on the exercise or deemed exercise of the Special Warrant. Each Unit is comprised of one common share in the share capital of the Company (a Special Warrant Share) and one-half of one warrant to purchase a common share in the share capital of the Company (each whole warrant, a Purchase Warrant, and together with the Special Warrant Shares, the Qualified Securities). Each Purchase Warrant will entitle the holder thereof to purchase one common share in the share capital of the Company (a Purchase Warrant Share) at an exercise price of $0.90 per Purchase Warrant Share at any time before December 9, 2011.
Each Special Warrant will be deemed to be exercised and surrendered, without any further action by the holder thereof, on the earlier of: (a) the third business day after the date (the Prospectus Qualification Date) that a final receipt is issued for this short form prospectus by the securities regulatory authority of the province in which such holder is resident (or by the Autorité des marchés financiers if the holder is not a resident of Canada); and (b) April 10, 2010 (the Conversion Deadline). If the Prospectus Qualification Date does not occur on or before January 23, 2010 (the Qualification Deadline), then each Special Warrant exercised or deemed to be exercised following the Qualification Deadline shall entitle its holder to acquire 1.1 Units (1.1 Special Warrant Shares and 0.55 Purchase Warrants).
Subsequent to year end, on January 22, 2010, the final receipt for the short form prospectus was received and all the outstanding Special Warrants were deemed to be exercised effective January 27, 2010.
13. STOCK OPTIONS
Under the terms of the Companys stock option plan (the Plan) 14,252,398 Common Shares have been reserved for issuance. Options under the Plan are permitted to be granted to directors, officers, employees and consultants of the Company, provided that the maximum number of Common Shares which may be reserved for issuance to any one beneficiary in any 12 month period may not exceed 5% of the number of Common Shares then issued and outstanding or 2% in the case of a beneficiary who is conducting investor relations activities. The exercise price of options granted under the Plan is not permitted to be less than the closing price of the Common Shares on the day preceding the grant of the options, less any discount allowed by applicable securities legislation. Options granted pursuant to the Plan will have an exercise period of no more than 10 years, or such lesser period as may be permitted by applicable securities legislation.
During the year the Company granted 150,000 stock options with an estimated fair value of $21,000 in respect of investor relations activities, 150,000 stock options with an estimated fair value of $58,575 in respect of investment promotion activities, and 2,820,000 stock options with an estimated fair value of $1,101,203 to directors and officers. The Company reflected $247,157 of these fair values as compensation expense and as mining property costs during the year with contributed surplus increased by the same amount. The remainder of the fair value will be recognized over the related vesting periods. The exercise price of each of the options granted was greater than the market price at the date of grant. The fair value of stock options issued was estimated at the grant date based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following weighted average assumptions:
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
2.3 |
% |
3.2 |
% |
Expected life (years) |
|
4.0 |
|
2.5 |
|
Expected volatility |
|
66 |
% |
58 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
nil |
|
nil |
|
Option pricing models including the Black-Scholes model require the input of highly subjective assumptions that can materially affect the fair value estimate and therefore do not necessarily provide a reliable measure of the fair value of the Companys stock options.
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
(in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
13. STOCK OPTIONS (Continued)
Changes during the year in common stock options issued are as follows:
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||||
|
|
Number |
|
Weighted
|
|
Number |
|
Weighted
|
|
Options outstanding, beginning of year |
|
15,480,000 |
|
1.88 |
|
11,642,000 |
|
1.94 |
|
Granted |
|
3,120,000 |
|
0.80 |
|
3,850,000 |
|
1.70 |
|
Exercised |
|
(2,025,000 |
) |
0.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
Expired / Forfeited |
|
(835,000 |
) |
2.33 |
|
(12,000 |
) |
3.00 |
|
Options outstanding, end of year |
|
15,740,000 |
|
1.83 |
|
15,480,000 |
|
1.88 |
|
Options exercisable, end of year |
|
12,770,000 |
|
2.07 |
|
12,817,500 |
|
1.92 |
|
The following table summarizes information about the common stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2009:
Expiry Date |
|
Exercise
|
|
Number of
|
|
Number of
|
|
Weighted
|
|
March 1, 2011 |
|
1.00 |
|
1,905,000 |
|
1,905,000 |
|
1.2 |
|
September 23, 2011 |
|
1.59 |
|
600,000 |
|
600,000 |
|
1.7 |
|
December 21, 2011 |
|
3.00 |
|
2,000,000 |
|
2,000,000 |
|
2.0 |
|
April 2, 2012 |
|
0.70 |
|
150,000 |
|
150,000 |
|
2.3 |
|
October 10, 2012 |
|
2.40 |
|
5,115,000 |
|
5,115,000 |
|
2.8 |
|
November 19, 2012 |
|
2.40 |
|
150,000 |
|
150,000 |
|
2.9 |
|
July 25, 2013 |
|
1.70 |
|
2,850,000 |
|
2,850,000 |
|
3.6 |
|
October 22, 2014 |
|
0.80 |
|
2,970,000 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
1.83 |
|
15,740,000 |
|
12,770,000 |
|
3.0 |
|
14. WARRANTS
Changes during the year in share purchase warrants issued are as follows:
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||||
|
|
Number |
|
Weighted
|
|
Number |
|
Weighted
|
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
9,045,250 |
|
2.85 |
|
9,045,250 |
|
2.85 |
|
Granted |
|
42,487,426 |
|
0.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
(9,045,250 |
) |
2.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year |
|
42,487,426 |
|
0.92 |
|
9,045,250 |
|
2.85 |
|
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
(in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
14. WARRANTS (Continued)
The Company had the following share purchase warrants outstanding at December 31, 2009:
Expiry Date |
|
Exercise
|
|
Number of
|
|
Number of
|
|
Weighted
|
|
May 22, 2011 |
|
0.95 |
|
1,868,750 |
|
1,868,750 |
|
1.4 |
|
September 30, 2011 |
|
0.62 |
|
3,980,100 |
|
3,980,100 |
|
1.7 |
|
February 20, 2014 |
|
0.95 |
|
36,638,576 |
|
36,638,576 |
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
0.92 |
|
42,487,426 |
|
42,487,426 |
|
3.8 |
|
15. CONTRIBUTED SURPLUS
Changes during the year in contributed surplus are as follows:
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
14,634,913 |
|
10,622,067 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
1,611,800 |
|
4,012,846 |
|
Warrants issued in prospectus financing (Note 11 (i)) |
|
5,600,000 |
|
|
|
Warrants issued in private placements (Note 11 (ii),(iii)) |
|
861,551 |
|
|
|
Warrants issued on conversion of convertible debentures (Note 10) |
|
2,351,376 |
|
|
|
Warrants issued on conversion of notes payable (Note 8) |
|
255,665 |
|
|
|
Transfer to share capital, exercised options |
|
(538,650 |
) |
|
|
Balance, end of year |
|
24,776,655 |
|
14,634,913 |
|
16. COMMITMENTS
Operating lease
The Company is committed operating leases with annual payment requirements over the next five years as follows:
Year |
|
Amount
|
|
2010 |
|
168,102 |
|
2011 |
|
142,218 |
|
2012 |
|
135,564 |
|
2013 |
|
22,676 |
|
2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
468,560 |
|
17. CONTINGENCIES
Intangible Asset
In January 2005, the Company acquired the rights to use a technology which is expected to increase material recuperation of current and future Mexican projects. At the time the agreement was reached the Company issued 500,000 common shares and the Company is bound to issue an additional 500,000 common shares should it choose to use the technology at a commercial scale. In addition, the agreement provides that the Company pay royalties of 1.5% of all production resulting from the application of the technology in Mexican properties. The technology was not employed in the current period.
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
(in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
17. CONTINGENCIES (Continued)
Arbitration
On June 24, 2009, the Company received a Notice of Arbitration (the Notice) from its San Diego Property joint venture partner, Golden Tag Resources Ltd. (Golden Tag), wherein Golden Tag is seeking to refer certain matters, pertaining to the operation of the joint venture, to arbitration for resolution. The Company intends to vigorously contest the Notice and the conclusions sought therein. The Company is not able at this time to predict the outcome of such action or to estimate the potential amount of any loss that may result from an unfavourable ruling.
18. LOSS PER SHARE
The computations of basic and diluted loss per share are as follows:
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
||
Loss for the year |
|
$ |
8,417,937 |
|
$ |
18,043,280 |
|
Basic weighted average number of common shares |
|
277,277,485 |
|
242,609,557 |
|
||
Dilutive potential from options, warrants and convertible debentures |
|
645,422 |
|
1,181,250 |
|
||
Dilutive weighted average number of common shares |
|
277,922,907 |
|
243,790,807 |
|
||
Loss per share, basic and diluted |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
19. EXPLANATORY NOTE FOR CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Within the grouping Investment Activities, the amount of $3,428,880, stated as the cash expenditure on mining property acquisition costs, includes the payment of $2,331,600 paid under the terms of the contracts described under Mineral concession liability in note 9.
Long term debt increased by $944,365 ($868,541 US Dollars) in a non-cash transaction as part of the debt restructuring in which interest payable under the terms of the debt was consolidated into the long term debt. See note 9 under Term loan.
20. MANAGEMENT OF CAPITAL
The Companys objectives in managing its capital resources are to ensure the entitys ability to continue as a going concern. The Company satisfies its capital requirements through careful management of its cash resources and by utilizing credit facilities or issuing equity, as necessary, based on the prevalent economic conditions of both the industry and the capital markets and the underlying risks characteristics of the related assets. As at December 31, 2009, the Company had long-term debt of $16,618,541 US Dollars, repayment of which commences November 2009. The Company is also obligated to semi-annual payments of $1,000,000 due under terms of a mineral concession agreement.
Based on current plans and estimates management believes that its operations can be funded through working capital, potential future credit facilities, and cash flow expected to be generated from the sale of the gold and silver doré bars generated from the new recovery plant. As discussed note 1, the company is dependent on its ability to raise the necessary capital to fund its operations and management can not provide assurance that it will ultimately be able to complete the required funding transactions. Furthermore, since we do not have proven and probable reserves we can not predict with confidence the level of cash flows that will be generated from the new mill. As such, we may need to either restructure our long term debt so that repayment requirements match the cash generation capability or raise additional equity in the alternate. Management can provide no guarantee that the Company will be successful in these transactions should they be required.
The Company is not subject to any externally imposed capital requirements and there has been no change with respect to the overall capital risk management strategy during the year.
21. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Companys financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, advances and deposits, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, promissory notes payable, customer advances and long-term debt. Cash and cash equivalents are recognized at their fair value and the fair value of all other financial instruments approximate their carrying values, either due to
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
(in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
21. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (Continued)
their short-term maturity or capacity of prompt liquidation or, in the case of long-term debt because the market rate of interest is paid. Cash and cash equivalents are held with large financial institutions and, as at December 31, 2009 did not include any investments in asset-backed commercial paper.
The Company operates in Mexico and is exposed to currency risk in the normal course of business. Its sales and related accounts receivable are denominated in US dollars. A significant portion of its expenditures and related accounts payable are denominated in US dollars and Mexican pesos. The Companys long-term debt is denominated in US dollars. A portion of its cash and cash equivalents are held in US dollars and Mexican pesos.
22. SAN DIEGO JOINT VENTURE
The Companys consolidated financial statements include the following amounts related to the San Diego Joint Venture:
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Long term assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Mining property costs |
|
747,416 |
|
686,540 |
|
Cash flows resulting from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
Mining property costs |
|
(60,876 |
) |
(726,808 |
) |
ECUs share in the joint venture with Golden Tag Resources Ltd (Golden Tag) is 50% of the mining property costs incurred following the US$1,500,000 earn in by Golden Tag. The share was capitalized under Mining Properties for a value in the current year of $66,464 less project management fees charged to Golden Tag of $5,588.
23. LOSS CARRY FORWARDS
These financial statements do not take into account the tax benefit arising from loss carry forwards which are available to the Company to reduce its income for tax purposes in future periods.
At December 31, 2009, the Company had non-capital loss carryforwards, available to offset future taxable income for Canadian tax purposes, aggregating $8,358,927 which expire over the period between 2010 and 2029.
At December 31, 2009, the Company had tax loss carryforwards, available to offset future taxable income in Mexico, aggregating $45,026,853 which expire between 2010 and 2019.
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
(in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
24. Amendment for disclosure of Material Differences between Canadian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
These consolidated financial statements have been amended to include a note to present the material differences between Canadian and United States generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
The Company prepares its consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP in Canada, which differ in certain respects from GAAP in the United States. The effect of the principal measurement differences between Canadian and U.S. GAAP are summarized as follows:
Consolidated summarized balance sheets:
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||||||||
|
|
Footnote |
|
Canadian
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
U.S.
|
|
Canadian
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
U.S.
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
7,647,023 |
|
|
|
7,647,023 |
|
538,215 |
|
|
|
538,215 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
398,385 |
|
|
|
398,385 |
|
Accounts receivable, advances and deposits |
|
|
|
1,063,997 |
|
|
|
1,063,997 |
|
1,654,764 |
|
|
|
1,654,764 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
|
78,702 |
|
|
|
78,702 |
|
53,223 |
|
|
|
53,223 |
|
Mining property costs and property, plant and equipment |
|
a, b, c, d |
|
83,344,556 |
|
(31,954,796 |
) |
51,389,760 |
|
60,952,247 |
|
(26,611,629 |
) |
34,340,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
92,134,278 |
|
(31,954,796 |
) |
60,179,482 |
|
63,596,834 |
|
(26,611,629 |
) |
36,985,205 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
|
4,360,474 |
|
|
|
4,360,474 |
|
5,323,049 |
|
|
|
5,323,049 |
|
Customer advances |
|
|
|
1,944,350 |
|
|
|
1,944,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Promissory notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,521,752 |
|
|
|
1,521,752 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
|
4,578,601 |
|
|
|
4,578,601 |
|
3,059,313 |
|
|
|
3,059,313 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
16,511,220 |
|
|
|
16,511,220 |
|
15,280,736 |
|
|
|
15,280,736 |
|
Convertible debenture |
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,128,708 |
|
871,292 |
|
6,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
27,394,645 |
|
|
|
27,394,645 |
|
30,313,558 |
|
871,292 |
|
31,184,850 |
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital |
|
|
|
132,275,566 |
|
|
|
132,275,566 |
|
111,597,713 |
|
|
|
111,597,713 |
|
Value assigned to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special warrants |
|
|
|
10,801,114 |
|
|
|
10,801,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible debenture |
|
e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
869,014 |
|
869,014 |
|
|
|
Contributed surplus |
|
|
|
24,776,655 |
|
|
|
24,776,655 |
|
14,634,913 |
|
|
|
14,634,913 |
|
Retained earnings (deficit) |
|
a, b, c, d, e |
|
(103,113,702 |
) |
(31,954,796 |
) |
(135,068,498 |
) |
(93,818,364 |
) |
(26,613,907 |
) |
(120,432,271 |
) |
|
|
|
|
64,739,633 |
|
(31,954,796 |
) |
32,784,837 |
|
33,283,276 |
|
(27,482,921 |
) |
5,800,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
92,134,278 |
|
(31,954,796 |
) |
60,179,482 |
|
63,596,834 |
|
(26,611,629 |
) |
36,985,205 |
|
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
(in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
24. Amendment for disclosure of Material Differences between Canadian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (Continued)
Consolidated summarized statements of loss and other comprehensive loss:
|
|
Footnote |
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Loss in accordance with Canadian GAAP |
|
|
|
(8,417,937 |
) |
(18,043,280 |
) |
Mining property costs |
|
a |
|
(4,516,172 |
) |
(9,146,865 |
) |
Reversal of write-down |
|
b |
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
c |
|
(808,337 |
) |
(2,432,968 |
) |
Stock-based compensation and stock options expense |
|
d |
|
(18,656 |
) |
(90,190 |
) |
Financing fees for convertible debentures |
|
e |
|
(22,603 |
) |
(55,153 |
) |
Accretion expense relating to convertible debentures |
|
e |
|
24,879 |
|
52,875 |
|
Loss in accordance with U.S. GAAP |
|
|
|
(13,758,826 |
) |
(29,715,581 |
) |
Total comprehensive loss in accordance with U.S. GAAP |
|
|
|
(13,758,826 |
) |
(29,715,581 |
) |
Weighted-average common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
277,277,485 |
|
242,609,557 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
277,922,907 |
|
243,790,807 |
|
Loss per share in accordance with U.S. GAAP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
(0.05 |
) |
(0.12 |
) |
Diluted |
|
|
|
(0.05 |
) |
(0.12 |
) |
Consolidated summarized statements of deficit:
|
|
Footnote |
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Deficit, end of year, pursuant to Canadian GAAP |
|
|
|
(103,113,702 |
) |
(93,818,364 |
) |
Opening US GAAP adjustments balance |
|
|
|
(26,613,907 |
) |
(14,941,606 |
) |
Mining property costs |
|
a |
|
(4,516,172 |
) |
(9,146,865 |
) |
Reversal of write-down |
|
b |
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
c |
|
(808,337 |
) |
(2,432,968 |
) |
Stock-based compensation and stock options expense |
|
d |
|
(18,656 |
) |
(90,190 |
) |
Financing fees for convertible debentures |
|
e |
|
(22,603 |
) |
(55,153 |
) |
Accretion expense relating to convertible debentures |
|
e |
|
24,879 |
|
52,875 |
|
Deficit, end of year, pursuant to U.S. GAAP |
|
|
|
(135,068,498 |
) |
(120,432,271 |
) |
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
(in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
24. Amendment for disclosure of Material Differences between Canadian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (Continued)
Consolidated summarized statements of cash flows:
|
|
Footnote |
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Cash used in operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to Canadian GAAP |
|
|
|
(5,853,171 |
) |
(6,236,808 |
) |
Mining property costs |
|
f |
|
(4,516,172 |
) |
(9,146,865 |
) |
Reversal of write-down |
|
f |
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
f |
|
(808,337 |
) |
(2,432,968 |
) |
Stock-based compensation and stock options expense |
|
f |
|
(18,656 |
) |
(90,190 |
) |
Pursuant to U.S. GAAP |
|
|
|
(11,196,336 |
) |
(17,906,831 |
) |
Cash generated by financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to Canadian GAAP |
|
|
|
31,298,081 |
|
10,613,660 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
g |
|
397,800 |
|
(435,150 |
) |
Pursuant to U.S. GAAP |
|
|
|
31,695,881 |
|
10,178,510 |
|
Cash used in investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to Canadian GAAP |
|
|
|
(18,674,177 |
) |
(12,021,817 |
) |
Mining property costs |
|
f |
|
4,516,172 |
|
9,146,865 |
|
Reversal of write-down |
|
f |
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
f |
|
808,337 |
|
2,432,968 |
|
Stock-based compensation and stock options expense |
|
f |
|
18,656 |
|
90,190 |
|
Pursuant to U.S. GAAP |
|
|
|
(13,331,012 |
) |
(351,794 |
) |
Decrease in restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to Canadian GAAP |
|
|
|
397,800 |
|
(435,150 |
) |
Restricted cash |
|
g |
|
(397,800 |
) |
435,150 |
|
Pursuant to U.S. GAAP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to consolidated United States GAAP adjustments:
a. Mining property costs
Under Canadian GAAP, costs of acquiring mineral properties and related development expenditures are deferred. Exploration costs on mineral properties, other than acquisition costs, are deferred and capitalized under Canadian GAAP prior to the establishment of proven or probable reserves if they are considered to meet the definition of an asset. United States GAAP requires that all exploration costs be expensed.
b. Inventories
The Company has reflected its gold pyrite material-in-process inventory at a net realizable value of zero and, as such, recorded write-downs of inventory and an expense in the statement of loss. Under Canadian GAAP, the Company subsequently recorded a reversal of those write offs at the point where sales contracts for the related inventory were concluded. United States GAAP does not permit the reversal of previous write-downs of inventory.
c. Mining property costs classification in other income
Under Canadian GAAP, net revenue or expense derived from a mineral property prior to the production phase of a mine is capitalized and included in the cost of the asset. A United States GAAP adjustment arises because United States GAAP requires that all exploration related costs and associated revenues be expensed. Furthermore, United States GAAP requires that any incremental and direct costs associated with the sale of excavated saleable minerals during the development phase of the mine and prior to the production phase of the mine be classified as Other income and offset by the related amounts of proceeds from the sale
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
(in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
24. Amendment for disclosure of Material Differences between Canadian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (Continued)
of these minerals. Incremental and direct costs are those costs that would otherwise have not been incurred if not for the sale of these minerals.
d. Stock-based compensation and stock options
Under Canadian GAAP, stock-based compensation costs and stock option costs incurred during the exploration or development stage of the mineral properties are deferred and capitalized prior to the establishment of proven or probable reserves if they are considered to meet the definition of an asset. United States GAAP requires that all stock-based compensation costs and stock option costs be expensed.
e. Convertible debentures
Under Canadian GAAP, convertible debenture proceeds are allocated between their debt and equity component parts based on the relative fair values of the debt component and the embedded conversion feature. The debt component is accreted to the face value of the debentures with the resulting interest expense charged to operations. The costs of the financing are allocated on a proportional basis between the liability and equity portions based on their relative fair values with the liability portion of the costs expensed and the equity portion treated as a reduction of the gross proceeds allocated to the equity component. United States GAAP treats the convertible debenture solely as a liability since the embedded conversion feature does not meet US GAAP requirements for classification as an equity component. The liability is recorded at its full face value since the embedded conversion feature has no intrinsic value on a stand-alone basis and accordingly does not meet the requirements of an equity component under United States GAAP. United States GAAP requires that convertible debentures, net of issuance costs, be accreted to face value over the term ending on the first put date of the debentures which, in this case, is the issuance date of the debentures since the debentures are convertible on demand by the Unit holders. Thus, the debentures carrying value equals their face value on the balance sheet.
f. Mining property costs classification in statement of cash flow
United States GAAP requires that cash flows relating to mineral property exploration and land use costs be reported as operating activities. However, under Canadian GAAP mineral property exploration and land use costs are classified as investing activities.
g. Restricted cash
Under Canadian GAAP, restricted cash was disclosed as a separate line item in the statement of cash flows. United States GAAP requires that restricted cash be disclosed as a financing activity.
Other disclosures:
The following additional information would be presented if these consolidated financial statements were presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP:
i. Auditors Report: Emphasis of matter paragraph
In the United States, reporting standards for auditors require the addition of an explanatory paragraph (following the opinion paragraph) when the financial statements are affected by conditions and events that cast substantial doubt on the Companys ability to continue as a going concern, such as those described in Note 1 to the financial statements. Canadian reporting standards do not permit a reference to such events and conditions in the auditors report when these are adequately disclosed in the financial statements. The Auditor draws attention to Note 1 to the financial statements, which describes certain conditions that give rise to substantial doubt about the entitys ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. The Auditors opinion is not qualified in respect of this matter.
ii. Joint Venture
San Diego Joint Venture has been recorded under Canadian GAAP on a proportionate basis whereas under United States GAAP, investments in incorporated joint ventures should be accounted for using the equity method. However, the Company
ECU SILVER MINING INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
(in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted)
24. Amendment for disclosure of Material Differences between Canadian and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (Continued)
has elected to use the accommodation of the SEC whereby the accounting for joint ventures need not be reconciled from Canadian GAAP to United States GAAP since the different accounting treatment affects only the presentation and classification of financial statement items and not net income or shareholders equity.
iii. Accounts receivable
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Value added tax recoverable |
|
661,311 |
|
1,457,646 |
|
Trade receivables |
|
125,171 |
|
51,937 |
|
Other receivables |
|
277,515 |
|
145,181 |
|
|
|
1,063,997 |
|
1,654,764 |
|
iv. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Canadian tax purposes |
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance |
|
5,692,955 |
|
3,295,099 |
|
Increases based on tax positions related to the current year |
|
2,665,972 |
|
2,397,856 |
|
|
|
8,358,927 |
|
5,692,955 |
|
Mexican tax purposes |
|
|
|
|
|
Opening balance |
|
32,343,850 |
|
24,390,731 |
|
Increase based on tax positions related to the current year |
|
12,683,003 |
|
7,953,119 |
|
|
|
45,026,853 |
|
32,343,850 |
|
v. Income tax uncertainty
The Company and its subsidiaries file federal income tax returns in Canada and Mexico; the Companys Mexican subsidiaries also file Mexican state tax returns where required by law. With few exceptions, the Company and its Mexican subsidiaries are subject to Canadian federal or Mexican federal, state and local examinations by the tax authorities for a minimum of four years in arrearage to the extent that the Company receives a notice of assessment from the respective competent authorities.
vi. Deferred income tax
Canadian GAAP financial statements do not take into account the tax benefit arising from loss carry forwards which are available to the Company to reduce its income for tax purposes in future periods so that no deferred income tax has been recorded in the Canadian GAAP financial statements. Deferred tax assets are not recognized for the tax benefit arising from loss carry forwards to the extent that it is not probable that taxable profits will be available against which these loss carry forwards can be utilized in the future. The Company has disclosed its non-capital loss carry forwards and tax loss carry forwards as at December 31, 2009 in Note 23, Loss carry forwards to these consolidated financial statements. Therefore, consistent with the current Canadian GAAP accounting treatment, no deferred income tax consequences have been recorded under United States GAAP relating to US GAAP adjustments recorded in the reconciliations forthwith.
Exhibit 99.2
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA, COMBINED, CONDENSED
FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY
The following unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial information as of June 30, 2011, for the six-month period then ended and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 is presented to show the results of operations and financial position of Golden Minerals as if the business combination between Golden Minerals and ECU (the Transaction) had occurred as of January 1, 2010, and financial position as if the Transaction had occurred as of June 30, 2011.
This unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial information should be read in conjunction with the historical financial statements and accompanying footnotes of ECU included in this Form 8-K. You should not rely on the unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial information as an indication of the results of operations or financial position that would have been achieved if the Transaction with ECU had taken place on the dates indicated or an indication of the results of operations in the future.
The Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Condensed Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2011, combines the June 30, 2011 balance sheet of Golden Minerals with the June 30, 2011 balance sheet of ECU adjusted to record the net assets of ECU at their estimated fair values. The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Statements of Operations for the six-months ended June 30, 2011 and for the year ended December 31, 2010 combines the six month period operating results ended June 30, 2011 and 12 month operating results ended December 31, 2010 of Golden and ECU with certain adjustments described in the footnotes accompanying the pro forma operating statements. This pro forma balance sheet as of June 30, 2011 and the pro forma operating results for the 6 months ended June 30, 2011 and the 12 months ended December 31, 2010 are collectively referred to as, the Pro Forma Statements. Golden Minerals historical financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and reported in U.S. dollars. ECUs historical financial statements were prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP at December 31, 2010 and in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) at June 30, 2011 which differ in certain respects from U.S. GAAP. ECU Silver Minings historical financial statements were also reported in Canadian dollars. ECUs historical financial statements used in these Pro Forma Statements have been adjusted to conform to U.S. GAAP and have been translated to U.S. dollars. ECUs historical financial statements have been translated to U.S. dollars using period ending exchange rates of $0.995 and $0.965 for the condensed consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2011, respectively and average exchange rates of $1.030 and $0.977 for the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2010 and the six-months ended June 30, 2011, respectively The principal GAAP differences relate to: 1) the treatment of exploration and development costs and 2) revenues generated from saleable minerals during the development stage. Under Canadian GAAP and IFRS, ECU has been capitalizing exploration and development costs incurred during the development stage and offsetting those capitalized costs with revenue generated from saleable minerals. Under U.S. GAAP, those exploration and development costs are included as expenses on the statement of operations and revenues generated during the development stage are recorded as other income, net of incremental and direct costs associated with the revenue, on the statement of operations. The change to U.S. GAAP and U.S. dollars resulted in an increase in ECUs reported net losses of approximately $2.5 million and $1.1 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 and for the six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively.
The Pro Forma Statements reflect the terms of the Transaction, which was structured as a plan of arrangement under the Québec Business Corporations Act, whereby each ECU share was exchanged for 0.05 Golden Minerals shares and $0.000394 in cash. Upon completion of the Transaction, existing Golden Minerals shareholders and ECU shareholders own approximately 49% and 51%, respectively, of the outstanding common stock of the combined company.
Golden Minerals management believes that, on the basis set forth herein, the Pro Forma Statements reflect a reasonable estimate of the Transaction based on currently available information. Golden Minerals Company expects the Transaction to be accounted for as a business combination which requires the allocation of the purchase price to be based upon the estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Final fair value determinations may differ from those presented in these Pro Forma Statements.
Unadited Pro Forma Combined Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
At June 30, 2011
(In thousands)
|
|
Historical |
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
||||||
|
|
Golden Minerals |
|
ECU Silver |
|
Pro Forma |
|
Note |
|
Adjusted |
|
||||
|
|
Company |
|
Mining Inc. |
|
Adjustments |
|
Reference |
|
Balances |
|
||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Current assets |
|
$ |
87,764 |
|
$ |
2,914 |
|
$ |
(129 |
) |
1 |
|
$ |
90,549 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
14,043 |
|
52,404 |
|
260,244 |
|
1 |
|
355,047 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,760 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52,404 |
) |
3 |
|
|
|
||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
1,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,043 |
|
||||
Total assets |
|
$ |
102,850 |
|
$ |
55,318 |
|
$ |
288,471 |
|
|
|
$ |
446,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
4,209 |
|
$ |
12,438 |
|
$ |
15,445 |
|
4 |
|
$ |
32,092 |
|
Current portion of long term dbet |
|
|
|
7,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
7,611 |
|
||||
Long term debt |
|
|
|
9,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
9,984 |
|
||||
Deferred tax liabilitiy |
|
|
|
|
|
80,760 |
|
2 |
|
80,760 |
|
||||
Other long term liabilities |
|
756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
756 |
|
||||
Total liabilities |
|
4,965 |
|
30,034 |
|
96,205 |
|
|
|
131,203 |
|
||||
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Common stock |
|
153 |
|
154,595 |
|
160 |
|
1 |
|
313 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(154,595 |
) |
3 |
|
|
|
||||
Additional paid in capital |
|
186,193 |
|
27,352 |
|
232,836 |
|
1 |
|
422,584 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,352 |
) |
3 |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
5 |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,555 |
|
4 |
|
|
|
||||
Currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
794 |
|
(794 |
) |
3 |
|
|
|
||||
Accumulated deficit |
|
(88,066 |
) |
(157,456 |
) |
157,456 |
|
3 |
|
(107,066 |
) |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,000 |
) |
4 |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
5 |
|
|
|
||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
(395 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(395 |
) |
||||
Total shareholders equity |
|
97,885 |
|
25,285 |
|
192,266 |
|
|
|
315,436 |
|
||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
102,850 |
|
$ |
55,318 |
|
$ |
288,471 |
|
|
|
$ |
466,639 |
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial statements.
Unadited Pro Forma Combined Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
For The Year Ended December 31, 2010
|
|
Historical Results |
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
||||||
|
|
Golden Minerals |
|
ECU Silver |
|
Pro Forma |
|
Note |
|
Adjusted |
|
||||
|
|
Company |
|
Mining Inc. |
|
Adjustments |
|
Reference |
|
Results |
|
||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
||||||||||||
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Management service fees |
|
$ |
11,216 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,216 |
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Costs of services |
|
(2,566 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,566 |
) |
||||
Exploration expense |
|
(13,353 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,353 |
) |
||||
El Quevar project expense |
|
(15,755 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,755 |
) |
||||
Velardena district project expense |
|
|
|
(5,512 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(5,512 |
) |
||||
Administrative expense |
|
(8,600 |
) |
(5,372 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(13,972 |
) |
||||
Stock based compensation |
|
(3,281 |
) |
(932 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(4,213 |
) |
||||
(Impairment) reversal of impairment of long live assets |
|
873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
873 |
|
||||
Inventory impairment |
|
|
|
(137 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(137 |
) |
||||
Other operating income, net |
|
311 |
|
5,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
5,428 |
|
||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
(1,095 |
) |
(209 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1,304 |
) |
||||
Total costs and expenses |
|
(43,466 |
) |
(7,045 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(50,511 |
) |
||||
Loss from operations |
|
(32,250 |
) |
(7,045 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(39,295 |
) |
||||
Other income and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest and other income |
|
178 |
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
182 |
|
||||
Royalty income |
|
314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
314 |
|
||||
Interest and other expense |
|
|
|
(3,372 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(3,372 |
) |
||||
Loss on foreign currency |
|
(89 |
) |
1,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,187 |
|
||||
Other total income and expenses |
|
403 |
|
(2,092 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1,689 |
) |
||||
Loss before income taxes |
|
(31,847 |
) |
(9,137 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(40,984 |
) |
||||
Income taxes |
|
(1,427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,427 |
) |
||||
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
(33,274 |
) |
(9,137 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(42,411 |
) |
||||
Net loss from continuing operations per Common Share basic |
|
$ |
(3.72 |
) |
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1.70 |
) |
Net loss from continuing operations per Common Share diluted |
|
$ |
(3.72 |
) |
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1.70 |
) |
Weighted average Common Stock outstanding - basic |
|
8,947,739 |
|
306,073,467 |
|
16,004,111 |
|
1 |
|
24,951,850 |
|
||||
Weighted average Common Stock outstanding - diluted |
|
8,947,739 |
|
307,360,967 |
|
16,004,111 |
|
1 |
|
24,951,850 |
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial statements.
Unadited Pro Forma Combined Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
For The Six-Months Ended June 30, 2011
(In thousands)
|
|
Historical Results |
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
||||||
|
|
Golden Minerals |
|
ECU Silver |
|
Pro Forma |
|
Note |
|
Adjusted |
|
||||
|
|
Company |
|
Mining Inc. |
|
Adjustments |
|
Reference |
|
Results |
|
||||
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Exploration expense |
|
$ |
(8,006 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
(8,006 |
) |
El Quevar project expense |
|
(17,851 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,851 |
) |
||||
Velardena project expense |
|
|
|
(3,522 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(3,522 |
) |
||||
Administrative expense |
|
(6,103 |
) |
(5,077 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(11,180 |
) |
||||
Stock based compensation |
|
(2,068 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,068 |
) |
||||
Other operating income, net |
|
416 |
|
2,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,898 |
|
||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
(863 |
) |
(89 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(952 |
) |
||||
Total costs and expenses |
|
(34,475 |
) |
(6,206 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(40,681 |
) |
||||
Loss from operations |
|
(34,475 |
) |
(6,206 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(40,681 |
) |
||||
Other income and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest and other income |
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141 |
|
||||
Royalty income |
|
130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130 |
|
||||
Interest and other expense |
|
|
|
(2,156 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(2,156 |
) |
||||
Loss on foreign currency |
|
(214 |
) |
701 |
|
|
|
|
|
487 |
|
||||
Other total income and expenses |
|
57 |
|
(1,455 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1,398 |
) |
||||
Loss before income taxes |
|
(34,418 |
) |
(7,661 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(42,079 |
) |
||||
Income taxes |
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
||||
Net loss from continuing operations |
|
(34,516 |
) |
(7,661 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(42,177 |
) |
||||
Net loss from continuing operations per Common Share basic |
|
$ |
(2.32 |
) |
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1.37 |
) |
Net loss from continuing operations per Common Share diluted |
|
$ |
(2.32 |
) |
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
$ |
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1.37 |
) |
Weighted average Common Stock outstanding - basic |
|
14,886,137 |
|
311,269,949 |
|
16,004,111 |
|
1 |
|
30,890,248 |
|
||||
Weighted average Common Stock outstanding - diluted |
|
14,886,137 |
|
311,269,949 |
|
16,004,111 |
|
1 |
|
30,890,248 |
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial statements.
The following adjustments have been reflected in the Unaudited Combined Pro Forma Statements:
(1) To record the issuance of 16,004,111 shares of Golden Minerals common stock and $0.1 million of cash as purchase consideration for the Transaction based on the September 2, 2011 closing. The preliminary allocation of the purchase price based on the estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed is as follows:
Calculation of purchase price ($000s):
Stock consideration (a) |
|
$ |
223,097 |
|
Cash consideration |
|
129 |
|
|
Replacement stock options (b) |
|
1,155 |
|
|
Replacement warrants (b) |
|
8,744 |
|
|
Total purchase price |
|
$ |
233,125 |
|
(a) The value of Golden Minerals common stock used in these pro forma calculations is $13.94, the closing price on September 2, 2011.
(b) Certain of ECUs outstanding stock options and warrants will be replaced with Golden Minerals stock
options and warrants at quantities and at strike prices based on the Arrangements ratio if 0.05 Golden Minerals shares for each ECU share. These options and warrants were obligations of ECU prior to the Transaction and are therefore considered a portion of the purchase price. The fair value of these options and warrants used in this calculation were determined using a Black-Scholes pricing model.
Preliminary allocation of purchase price ($000s):
Current assets (c) |
|
$ |
2,914 |
|
Mineral properties (d) |
|
325,590 |
|
|
Plant and equipment (e) |
|
15,414 |
|
|
Liabilities assumed (c) |
|
(12,438 |
) |
|
Current portion of long term debt (c) |
|
(7,611 |
) |
|
Deferred tax liability |
|
(80,760 |
) |
|
Long term debt assumed (c) |
|
(9,984 |
) |
|
Total purchase price |
|
$ |
233,125 |
|
(c) Monetary assets and liabilities assumed have been recorded at their carrying values, which approximate fair value.
(d) Mineral properties are recorded at estimated fair market value based on the value of the consideration given in the form of Golden Minerals common stock. The mineral properties will not be amortized as they currently have no proven and probable reserves.
(e) Plant and equipment purchased in the Arrangement have been recorded at their carrying values, which approximate fair value.
(2) To record a deferred tax liability related to the taxable effect of the stepped-up basis in mineral properties recorded. The deferred tax liability was calculated by applying the Mexico corporate tax rate of 28% to the stepped-up basis in the mineral properties recorded and is net of a deferred tax asset of approximately $8.3 million resulting from the application of the 28% Mexico corporate tax rate to an estimated usable net operating loss carry-forward of approximately $29.5 million.
(3) To eliminate ECUs historical equity and non-monetary asset balances.
(4) The Pro Forma Combined Statement of Operations do not include estimated one-time transaction costs totaling $17.0 million which are recorded in the pro forma balance sheet as an increase in the Accumulated Deficit. Total transaction costs consist of estimated one-time transaction costs of $5.0 million incurred by Golden Minerals and estimated one-time transaction costs including severance benefits, bonuses and other change of control payments of $12.0 million incurred by ECU, a portion of which will be paid through the issuance of $1.6 million of Golden Minerals shares. The transaction costs will be recorded once the expenses have been incurred and may differ from the estimate.
(5) Upon completion of the Arrangement, existing Golden Minerals shareholders and ECU shareholders own approximately 49% and 51%, respectively, of the outstanding common stock of the combined company. The transaction constitutes a change in control under the terms of Golden Minerals 2009 Equity Incentive Plan and triggers the vesting of certain previously unvested stock grants to Golden Minerals officers and employees. The accelerated vesting of these stock grants would have resulted in the recognition of approximately $2.0 million of stock based compensation expense. While this direct incremental cost is reflected in the pro forma balance sheet as an increase in the Accumulated Deficit, it has not been included in the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Statement of Operations. Such costs will be recorded as an expense when the Arrangement with ECU is closed and may differ from the estimated amount herein.