Table of Contents

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

x

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012

 

or

 

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

Commission File Number: 1-31371

 

Oshkosh Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Wisconsin

 

39-0520270

(State or other jurisdiction

of incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

 

P.O. Box 2566

Oshkosh, Wisconsin

 

54903-2566

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (920) 235-9151

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x  Yes  o  No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding
12 months. 
x  Yes  o  No

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer x

 

Accelerated filer o

 

 

 

Non-accelerated filer o

 

Smaller reporting company o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). o  Yes  x  No

 

As of April 20, 2012, 91,641,354 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock were outstanding.

 

 

 



Table of Contents

 

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

 

FORM 10-Q IND EX

 

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2012

 

 

 

Page

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

 

 

 

ITEM 1.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

 

 

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three Months and Six Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011

3

 

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2012 and September 30, 2011

4

 

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Six Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011

5

 

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011

6

 

 

 

 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

7

 

 

 

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

30

 

 

 

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

40

 

 

 

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

41

 

 

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

 

 

 

 

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

42

 

 

 

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

42

 

 

 

ITEM 2.

UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

44

 

 

 

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS

44

 

 

SIGNATURES

45

 

 

EXHIBIT INDEX

46

 

2



Table of Contents

 

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income

(In millions, except per share amounts; unaudited)

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Six Months Ended

 

 

 

March 31,

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

2,075.3

 

$

1,745.6

 

$

3,953.9

 

$

3,446.4

 

Cost of sales

 

1,835.9

 

1,464.5

 

3,492.0

 

2,856.3

 

Gross income

 

239.4

 

281.1

 

461.9

 

590.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

148.7

 

133.7

 

281.0

 

258.7

 

Amortization of purchased intangibles

 

14.8

 

15.0

 

29.7

 

30.3

 

Total operating expenses

 

163.5

 

148.7

 

310.7

 

289.0

 

Operating income

 

75.9

 

132.4

 

151.2

 

301.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other income (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

(18.2

)

(21.7

)

(38.8

)

(48.2

)

Interest income

 

0.6

 

1.0

 

1.2

 

1.8

 

Miscellaneous, net

 

1.3

 

0.4

 

(4.3

)

0.1

 

Income from operations before income taxes and equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates

 

59.6

 

112.1

 

109.3

 

254.8

 

Provision for income taxes

 

21.6

 

44.2

 

32.7

 

88.2

 

Income from operations before equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates

 

38.0

 

67.9

 

76.6

 

166.6

 

Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

(0.2

)

0.7

 

0.2

 

Net income

 

38.0

 

67.7

 

77.3

 

166.8

 

Net (income) loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest

 

(0.7

)

0.2

 

(1.1

)

0.7

 

Net income attributable to Oshkosh Corporation

 

$

37.3

 

$

67.9

 

$

76.2

 

$

167.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per share attributable to Oshkosh Corporation common shareholders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.41

 

$

0.75

 

$

0.84

 

$

1.85

 

Diluted

 

0.41

 

0.74

 

0.83

 

1.83

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

3



Table of Contents

 

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In millions, except share and per share amounts; unaudited)

 

 

 

March 31,

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

388.4

 

$

428.5

 

Receivables, net

 

1,115.3

 

1,089.1

 

Inventories, net

 

849.3

 

786.8

 

Deferred income taxes

 

67.0

 

72.9

 

Other current assets

 

60.4

 

77.3

 

Total current assets

 

2,480.4

 

2,454.6

 

Investment in unconsolidated affiliates

 

32.7

 

31.8

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

365.9

 

388.7

 

Goodwill

 

1,042.9

 

1,041.5

 

Purchased intangible assets, net

 

809.9

 

838.7

 

Other long-term assets

 

61.4

 

71.6

 

Total assets

 

$

4,793.2

 

$

4,826.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and Equity

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Revolving credit facility and current maturities of long-term debt

 

$

0.1

 

$

40.1

 

Accounts payable

 

757.4

 

768.9

 

Customer advances

 

420.3

 

468.6

 

Payroll-related obligations

 

102.2

 

110.7

 

Income taxes payable

 

5.5

 

5.3

 

Accrued warranty

 

80.9

 

75.0

 

Deferred revenue

 

55.3

 

38.4

 

Other current liabilities

 

166.5

 

184.8

 

Total current liabilities

 

1,588.2

 

1,691.8

 

Long-term debt, less current maturities

 

987.7

 

1,020.0

 

Deferred income taxes

 

156.2

 

171.3

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

369.8

 

347.2

 

Commitments and contingencies

 

 

 

 

 

Equity:

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred Stock ($.01 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding)

 

 

 

Common Stock ($.01 par value; 300,000,000 shares authorized; 91,636,354 and 91,330,019 shares issued, respectively)

 

0.9

 

0.9

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

694.8

 

685.6

 

Retained earnings

 

1,108.9

 

1,032.7

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

(114.5

)

(122.6

)

Common Stock in treasury, at cost (6,956 shares at September 30, 2011)

 

 

(0.1

)

Total Oshkosh Corporation shareholders’ equity

 

1,690.1

 

1,596.5

 

Noncontrolling interest

 

1.2

 

0.1

 

Total equity

 

1,691.3

 

1,596.6

 

Total liabilities and equity

 

$

4,793.2

 

$

4,826.9

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

4



Table of Contents

 

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity

(In millions; unaudited)

 

 

 

Oshkosh Corporation’s Shareholders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

Common

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

Other

 

Stock in

 

Non-

 

 

 

 

 

Common

 

Paid-In

 

Retained

 

Comprehensive

 

Treasury

 

Controlling

 

Comprehensive

 

 

 

Stock

 

Capital

 

Earnings

 

Income (Loss)

 

at Cost

 

Interest

 

Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at September 30, 2010

 

$

0.9

 

$

659.7

 

$

759.2

 

$

(93.2

)

$

 

$

0.2

 

 

 

Comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

167.5

 

 

 

(0.7

)

$

166.8

 

Change in fair value of derivative instruments, net of tax of $3.1

 

 

 

 

5.4

 

 

 

5.4

 

Employee pension and postretirement benefits, net of tax of $1.7

 

 

 

 

2.9

 

 

 

2.9

 

Currency translation adjustments

 

 

 

 

22.7

 

 

 

22.7

 

Total comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

197.8

 

Exercise of stock options

 

 

7.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation and award of nonvested shares

 

 

8.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax benefit related to stock-based compensation

 

 

2.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at March 31, 2011

 

$

0.9

 

$

677.3

 

$

926.7

 

$

(62.2

)

$

 

$

(0.5

)

 

 

 

 

 

Oshkosh Corporation’s Shareholders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

Common

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

Other

 

Stock in

 

Non-

 

 

 

 

 

Common

 

Paid-In

 

Retained

 

Comprehensive

 

Treasury

 

Controlling

 

Comprehensive

 

 

 

Stock

 

Capital

 

Earnings

 

Income (Loss)

 

at Cost

 

Interest

 

Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at September 30, 2011

 

$

0.9

 

$

685.6

 

$

1,032.7

 

$

(122.6

)

$

(0.1

)

$

0.1

 

 

 

Comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

76.2

 

 

 

1.1

 

$

77.3

 

Change in fair value of derivative instruments, net of tax of $0.8

 

 

 

 

1.4

 

 

 

1.4

 

Employee pension and postretirement benefits, net of tax of $1.8

 

 

 

 

3.0

 

 

 

3.0

 

Currency translation adjustments

 

 

 

 

3.7

 

 

 

3.7

 

Total comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

85.4

 

Exercise of stock options

 

 

2.2

 

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

 

Stock-based compensation and award of nonvested shares

 

 

6.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

(0.6

)

 

 

 

Balance at March 31, 2012

 

$

0.9

 

$

694.8

 

$

1,108.9

 

$

(114.5

)

$

 

$

1.2

 

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

5



Table of Contents

 

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In millions; unaudited)

 

 

 

Six Months Ended

 

 

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

Operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

77.3

 

$

166.8

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

64.3

 

69.9

 

Deferred income taxes

 

(11.8

)

2.7

 

Other non-cash adjustments

 

4.4

 

4.7

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities

 

(87.3

)

12.5

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

46.9

 

256.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Additions to property, plant and equipment

 

(24.1

)

(31.0

)

Additions to equipment held for rental

 

(3.1

)

(3.1

)

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment

 

6.1

 

0.7

 

Proceeds from sale of equipment held for rental

 

2.4

 

7.8

 

Other investing activities

 

(0.7

)

(1.1

)

Net cash used by investing activities

 

(19.4

)

(26.7

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Repayment of long-term debt

 

(72.5

)

(65.3

)

Repayments under revolving credit facility

 

 

(100.0

)

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

 

2.9

 

7.0

 

Other financing activities

 

(0.2

)

1.8

 

Net cash used by financing activities

 

(69.8

)

(156.5

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

 

2.2

 

4.3

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

(40.1

)

77.7

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 

428.5

 

339.0

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 

$

388.4

 

$

416.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosures:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for interest

 

$

37.0

 

$

45.5

 

Cash paid for income taxes

 

31.6

 

79.8

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

6



Table of Contents

 

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

1.     Basis of Presentation

 

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contain all adjustments (which include normal recurring adjustments, unless otherwise noted) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in Oshkosh Corporation’s (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2011. The interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year.

 

2.     New Accounting Standards

 

In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) amended Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 220, Comprehensive Income , to require all non-owner changes in shareholders’ equity to be presented in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. Under this amendment, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. An entity will no longer be permitted to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of equity. The Company will be required to adopt the new presentation requirements as of October 1, 2012. The adoption of the new presentation will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

 

3.     Receivables

 

Receivables consisted of the following (in millions):

 

 

 

March 31,

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

U.S. government:

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts billed

 

$

232.4

 

$

318.8

 

Costs and profits not billed

 

220.5

 

172.3

 

 

 

452.9

 

491.1

 

Other trade receivables

 

634.4

 

568.8

 

Finance receivables

 

6.9

 

23.6

 

Notes receivable

 

28.0

 

33.7

 

Other receivables

 

33.2

 

27.4

 

 

 

1,155.4

 

1,144.6

 

Less allowance for doubtful accounts

 

(21.8

)

(29.5

)

 

 

$

1,133.6

 

$

1,115.1

 

 

Costs and profits not billed generally result from undefinitized change orders on existing long-term contracts and “not-to-exceed” undefinitized contracts whereby the Company cannot invoice the customer the full price under the contract or contract change order until such contract or change order is definitized and agreed to with the customer following a review of costs under such a contract award even though the contract deliverables may have been met. Definitization of a change order on an existing long-term contract or a sole source contract begins when the U.S. government customer undertakes a detailed review of the Company’s submitted costs related to the contract, with the final change order or contract price subject to review. The Company recognizes revenue on undefinitized contracts to the extent that it can reasonably and reliably estimate the expected final contract price and when collectability is reasonably assured. Through March 31, 2012, the Company has recorded $621.1 million in revenue on contracts which remain undefinitized as of that date. To the extent that contract definitization results in changes to previously estimated or incurred costs or revenues, the Company records those adjustments as a change in estimate.

 

7



Table of Contents

 

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

Classification of receivables in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets consisted of the following (in millions):

 

 

 

March 31,

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current receivables

 

$

1,115.3

 

$

1,089.1

 

Long-term receivables

 

18.3

 

26.0

 

 

 

$

1,133.6

 

$

1,115.1

 

 

Finance Receivables: Finance receivables represent sales-type leases resulting from the sale of the Company’s products and the purchase of finance receivables from lenders pursuant to customer defaults under program agreements with finance companies. Finance receivables originated by the Company generally include a residual value component. Residual values are determined based on the expectation that the underlying equipment will have a minimum fair market value at the end of the lease term. This residual value accrues to the Company at the end of the lease. The Company uses its experience and knowledge as an original equipment manufacturer and participant in end markets for the related products along with third-party studies to estimate residual values. The Company monitors these values for impairment on a periodic basis and reflects any resulting reductions in value in current earnings. Finance receivables are written down once management determines that the specific borrower does not have the ability to repay the loan in full.

 

Finance receivables consisted of the following (in millions):

 

 

 

March 31,

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finance receivables

 

$

7.9

 

$

27.9

 

Less unearned income

 

(1.0

)

(4.3

)

Net finance receivables

 

6.9

 

23.6

 

Less allowance for doubtful accounts

 

(3.1

)

(11.5

)

 

 

$

3.8

 

$

12.1

 

 

Contractual maturities of the Company’s finance receivables at March 31, 2012 were as follows: 2012 (remaining six months) - $3.5 million; 2013 - $1.4 million; 2014 - $1.4 million; 2015 - $0.8 million; 2016 - $0.4 million; 2017 - $0.1 million; and thereafter - $0.3 million. Historically, obligors have paid off finance receivables prior to their contractual due dates, although actual repayment timing is impacted by a number of factors, including the economic environment at the time. As a result, contractual maturities are not to be regarded as a forecast of future cash flows.

 

Delinquency is the primary indicator of credit quality of finance receivables. The Company maintains a general allowance for finance receivables considered doubtful of future collection based upon historical experience. Additional allowances are established based upon the Company’s perception of the quality of the finance receivables, including the length of time the receivables are past due, past experience of collectability and underlying economic conditions. In circumstances where the Company believes collectability is no longer reasonably assured, a specific allowance is recorded to reduce the net recognized receivable to the amount reasonably expected to be collected. The terms of the finance agreements generally give the Company the ability to take possession of the underlying collateral. The Company may incur losses in excess of recorded allowances if the financial condition of its customers were to deteriorate or the full amount of any anticipated proceeds from the sale of the collateral supporting its customers’ financial obligations is not realized.

 

Notes Receivable: Notes receivable include refinancing of trade accounts and finance receivables. As of March 31, 2012, approximately 92% of the notes receivable balance outstanding was due from three parties. The Company routinely evaluates the creditworthiness of its customers and establishes reserves where the Company believes collectability is no longer reasonably assured. Notes receivable are written down once management determines that the specific borrower does not have the ability to repay the loan in full. Certain notes receivable are collateralized by a security interest in the underlying assets and/or other assets owned by the debtor. The Company may incur losses in excess of recorded allowances if the financial

 

8



Table of Contents

 

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

condition of its customers were to deteriorate or the full amount of any anticipated proceeds from the sale of the collateral supporting its customers’ financial obligations is not realized.

 

Quality of Finance and Notes Receivable: The Company does not accrue interest income on finance and notes receivables in circumstances where the Company believes collectability is no longer reasonably assured. Any cash payments received on nonaccrual finance and notes receivable are applied first to principal balances. The Company does not resume accrual of interest income until the customer has shown that it is capable of meeting its financial obligations by making timely payments over a sustained period of time. The Company determines past due or delinquency status based upon the due date of the receivable.

 

Finance and notes receivable aging and accrual status consisted of the following (in millions):

 

 

 

Finance Receivables

 

Notes Receivable

 

 

 

March 31,

 

September 30,

 

March 31,

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

Aging of receivables that are past due:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Greater than 30 days and less than 60 days

 

$

0.1

 

$

0.5

 

$

 

$

 

Greater than 60 days and less than 90 days

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

Greater than 90 days

 

1.7

 

6.5

 

0.3

 

0.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Receivables on nonaccrual status

 

4.2

 

17.6

 

20.6

 

20.8

 

Receivables past due 90 days or more and still accruing

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Receivables subject to general reserves

 

0.8

 

0.4

 

3.3

 

8.6

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

 

 

(0.1

)

(0.1

)

Receivables subject to specific reserves

 

6.1

 

23.2

 

24.7

 

25.1

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

(3.1

)

(11.5

)

(8.4

)

(8.8

)

 

Receivables subject to specific reserves also include loans that the Company has modified in troubled debt restructurings as a concession to customers experiencing financial difficulty. To minimize the economic loss, the Company may modify certain finance and notes receivable. Modifications generally consist of restructured payment terms and time frames in which no payments are required. Troubled debt restructurings were not significant during the three and six months ended March 31, 2012.

 

Changes in the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts were as follows (in millions):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended March 31, 2012

 

Three Months Ended March 31, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trade and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trade and

 

 

 

 

 

Finance

 

Notes

 

Other

 

Total

 

Finance

 

Notes

 

Other

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning balance

 

$

3.7

 

$

8.7

 

$

8.7

 

$

21.1

 

$

14.8

 

$

12.7

 

$

10.7

 

$

38.2

 

Provision, net of recoveries

 

(0.6

)

(0.2

)

1.7

 

0.9

 

2.3

 

(0.6

)

0.5

 

2.2

 

Charge-offs

 

 

 

(0.2

)

(0.2

)

(0.8

)

(2.1

)

(1.9

)

(4.8

)

Foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.2

 

0.1

 

0.3

 

Ending balance

 

$

3.1

 

$

8.5

 

$

10.2

 

$

21.8

 

$

16.3

 

$

10.2

 

$

9.4

 

$

35.9

 

 

9



Table of Contents

 

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Six Months Ended March 31, 2012

 

Six Months Ended March 31, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trade and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trade and

 

 

 

 

 

Finance

 

Notes

 

Other

 

Total

 

Finance

 

Notes

 

Other

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning balance

 

$

11.5

 

$

8.9

 

$

9.1

 

$

29.5

 

$

20.9

 

$

9.4

 

$

11.7

 

$

42.0

 

Provision, net of recoveries

 

(3.1

)

(0.2

)

2.3

 

(1.0

)

0.9

 

2.8

 

0.3

 

4.0

 

Charge-offs

 

(5.3

)

(0.2

)

(1.2

)

(6.7

)

(5.5

)

(2.1

)

(2.7

)

(10.3

)

Foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.1

 

0.1

 

0.2

 

Ending balance

 

$

3.1

 

$

8.5

 

$

10.2

 

$

21.8

 

$

16.3

 

$

10.2

 

$

9.4

 

$

35.9

 

 

4.     Inventories

 

Inventories consisted of the following (in millions):

 

 

 

March 31,

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Raw materials

 

$

550.1

 

$

587.4

 

Partially finished products

 

344.8

 

377.7

 

Finished products

 

462.5

 

237.8

 

Inventories at FIFO cost

 

1,357.4

 

1,202.9

 

Less:

Progress/performance-based payments on U.S. government contracts

 

(429.5

)

(341.7

)

 

Excess of FIFO cost over LIFO cost

 

(78.6

)

(74.4

)

 

 

$

849.3

 

$

786.8

 

 

Title to all inventories related to government contracts, which provide for progress or performance-based payments, vests with the government to the extent of unliquidated progress or performance-based payments.

 

5.     Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates

 

Investments in unconsolidated affiliates are accounted for under the equity method and consisted of the following (in millions):

 

 

 

Percent-

 

March 31,

 

September 30,

 

 

 

owned

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OMFSP (U.S.)

 

50%

 

$

14.4

 

$

13.4

 

RiRent (The Netherlands)

 

50%

 

10.9

 

10.9

 

Other

 

 

 

7.4

 

7.5

 

 

 

 

 

$

32.7

 

$

31.8

 

 

Recorded investments generally represent the Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of the Company’s ownership interest. Earnings or losses are reflected in “Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates” in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

 

The Company and an unaffiliated third-party are partners in Oshkosh/McNeilus Financial Services Partnership (“OMFSP”), a general partnership formed for the purpose of offering lease financing to certain customers of the Company. OMFSP has historically engaged in providing vendor lease financing to certain customers of the Company. OMFSP has not actively solicited new leases in the past twelve months.

 

10



Table of Contents

 

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

The Company and an unaffiliated third-party are joint venture partners in RiRent Europe, B.V. (“RiRent”). RiRent maintains a fleet of access equipment for short-term lease to rental companies throughout most of Europe. The re-rental fleet provides rental companies with equipment to support requirements on short notice. RiRent does not provide services directly to end users. The Company’s sales to RiRent were $1.7 million and $2.0 million for the six months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Company recognizes income on sales to RiRent at the time of shipment in proportion to the outside third-party interest in RiRent and recognizes the remaining income ratably over the estimated useful life of the equipment, which is generally five years. Indebtedness of RiRent is secured by the underlying leases and assets of RiRent. All such RiRent indebtedness is non-recourse to the Company and its partner. Under RiRent’s €15.0 million bank credit facility, the partners of RiRent have committed to maintain an overall equity to asset ratio of at least 30.0% (66.3% as of March 31, 2012).

 

6.     Property, Plant and Equipment

 

Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following (in millions):

 

 

 

March 31,

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land and land improvements

 

$

46.1

 

$

46.2

 

Buildings

 

236.9

 

243.8

 

Machinery and equipment

 

525.7

 

521.5

 

Equipment on operating lease to others

 

22.7

 

23.0

 

 

 

831.4

 

834.5

 

Less accumulated depreciation

 

(465.5

)

(445.8

)

 

 

$

365.9

 

$

388.7

 

 

Depreciation expense was $32.0 million and $36.9 million for the six months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Equipment on operating lease to others represents the cost of equipment shipped to customers for whom the Company has guaranteed the residual value and equipment on short-term lease. These transactions are accounted for as operating leases with the related assets capitalized and depreciated over their estimated economic lives of five to ten years. Cost less accumulated depreciation for equipment on operating lease at March 31, 2012 and September 30, 2011 was $6.9 million and $6.5 million, respectively.

 

7.     Goodwill and Purchased Intangible Assets

 

Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized, but are reviewed for impairment annually, or more frequently if potential interim indicators exist that could result in impairment. The Company performs its annual impairment test in the fourth quarter of its fiscal year.

 

The following table presents changes in goodwill during the six months ended March 31, 2012 (in millions):

 

 

 

Access

 

Fire &

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equipment

 

Emergency

 

Commercial

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning balance

 

$

912.2

 

$

107.9

 

$

21.4

 

$

1,041.5

 

Foreign currency translation

 

1.3

 

 

0.1

 

1.4

 

Ending balance

 

$

913.5

 

$

107.9

 

$

21.5

 

$

1,042.9

 

 

11



Table of Contents

 

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

The following table presents details of the Company’s goodwill allocated to the reportable segments (in millions):

 

 

 

March 31, 2012

 

September 30, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

Impairment

 

Net

 

Gross

 

Impairment

 

Net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Access Equipment

 

$

1,845.6

 

$

(932.1

)

$

913.5

 

$

1,844.3

 

$

(932.1

)

$

912.2

 

Fire & Emergency

 

182.1

 

(74.2

)

107.9

 

182.1

 

(74.2

)

107.9

 

Commerical

 

197.4

 

(175.9

)

21.5

 

197.3

 

(175.9

)

21.4

 

 

 

$

2,225.1

 

$

(1,182.2

)

$

1,042.9

 

$

2,223.7

 

$

(1,182.2

)

$

1,041.5

 

 

Details of the Company’s total purchased intangible assets were as follows (in millions):

 

 

 

March 31, 2012

 

 

 

Weighted-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

Life

 

Gross

 

Amortization

 

Net

 

Amortizable intangible assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distribution network

 

39.1

 

$

55.4

 

$

(21.5

)

$

33.9

 

Non-compete

 

10.5

 

56.9

 

(54.3

)

2.6

 

Technology-related

 

11.7

 

104.8

 

(57.9

)

46.9

 

Customer relationships

 

12.6

 

577.8

 

(253.0

)

324.8

 

Other

 

16.5

 

16.6

 

(12.5

)

4.1

 

 

 

14.3

 

811.5

 

(399.2

)

412.3

 

Non-amortizable trade names

 

 

 

397.6

 

 

397.6

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,209.1

 

$

(399.2

)

$

809.9

 

 

 

 

September 30, 2011

 

 

 

Weighted-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

Life

 

Gross

 

Amortization

 

Net

 

Amortizable intangible assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Distribution network

 

39.1

 

$

55.4

 

$

(20.8

)

$

34.6

 

Non-compete

 

10.5

 

56.9

 

(53.0

)

3.9

 

Technology-related

 

11.7

 

104.8

 

(53.3

)

51.5

 

Customer relationships

 

12.7

 

576.7

 

(229.9

)

346.8

 

Other

 

16.5

 

16.5

 

(12.2

)

4.3

 

 

 

14.3

 

810.3

 

(369.2

)

441.1

 

Non-amortizable trade names

 

 

 

397.6

 

 

397.6

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,207.9

 

$

(369.2

)

$

838.7

 

 

Amortization expense was $29.7 million and $30.3 million for the six months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The estimated future amortization expense of purchased intangible assets for the remainder of fiscal 2012 and the five years succeeding September 30, 2012 are as follows: 2012 (remaining six months) - $29.3 million; 2013 - $57.1 million; 2014 - $55.4 million; 2015 - $54.3 million; 2016 - $53.7 million and 2017 - $45.6 million.

 

12



Table of Contents

 

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

8.     Credit Agreements

 

The Company was obligated under the following debt instruments (in millions):

 

 

 

March 31,

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senior Secured Term Loan

 

$

487.5

 

$

560.0

 

8¼% Senior notes due March 2017

 

250.0

 

250.0

 

8½% Senior notes due March 2020

 

250.0

 

250.0

 

Other long-term facilities

 

0.3

 

0.1

 

 

 

987.8

 

1,060.1

 

Less current maturities

 

(0.1

)

(40.1

)

 

 

$

987.7

 

$

1,020.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revolving line of credit

 

$

 

$

 

Current maturities of long-term debt

 

0.1

 

40.1

 

 

 

$

0.1

 

$

40.1

 

 

The Company has a senior secured credit agreement with various lenders (the “Credit Agreement”). The Credit Agreement provides for (i) a revolving credit facility (“Revolving Credit Facility”) that matures in October 2015 with an initial maximum aggregate amount of availability of $550 million and (ii) a $650 million term loan (“Term Loan”) facility due in quarterly principal installments of $16.25 million with a balloon payment of $341.25 million due at maturity in October 2015. During the first six months of fiscal 2012, the Company prepaid the principal installments under the Term Loan that were originally due June 30, 2012 through March 31, 2013. At March 31, 2012, outstanding letters of credit of $32.7 million reduced available capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility to $517.3 million.

 

The Company’s obligations under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by certain of its domestic subsidiaries, and the Company will guarantee the obligations of certain of its subsidiaries under the Credit Agreement to the extent such subsidiaries borrow directly under the Credit Agreement. Subject to certain exceptions, the Credit Agreement is secured by (i) a first-priority perfected lien and security interests in substantially all of the personal property of the Company, each material subsidiary of the Company and each subsidiary guarantor, (ii) mortgages upon certain real property of the Company and certain of its domestic subsidiaries and (iii) a pledge of the equity of each material subsidiary and each subsidiary guarantor.

 

The Company must pay (i) an unused commitment fee ranging from 0.40% to 0.50% per annum of the average daily unused portion of the aggregate revolving credit commitments under the Credit Agreement and (ii) a fee ranging from 1.125% to 3.50% per annum of the maximum amount available to be drawn for each letter of credit issued and outstanding under the Credit Agreement.

 

Borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest at a variable rate equal to (i) LIBOR plus a specified margin, which may be adjusted upward or downward depending on whether certain criteria are satisfied, or (ii) for dollar-denominated loans only, the base rate (which is the highest of (a) the administrative agent’s prime rate, (b) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% or (c) the sum of 1% plus one-month LIBOR) plus a specified margin, which may be adjusted upward or downward depending on whether certain criteria are satisfied. At March 31, 2012, the interest spread on the Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan was 275 basis points. The weighted-average interest rate on borrowings outstanding under the Term Loan at March 31, 2012 was 2.99%.

 

13



Table of Contents

 

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

The Credit Agreement contains various restrictions and covenants, including requirements that the Company maintain certain financial ratios at prescribed levels and restrictions on the ability of the Company and certain of its subsidiaries to consolidate or merge, create liens, incur additional indebtedness, dispose of assets, consummate acquisitions and make investments in joint ventures and foreign subsidiaries. The Credit Agreement contains the following financial covenants:

 

·                   Leverage Ratio: A maximum leverage ratio (defined as, with certain adjustments, the ratio of the Company’s consolidated indebtedness to consolidated net income before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, non-cash charges and certain other items (“EBITDA”)) as of the last day of any fiscal quarter of 4.50 to 1.0.

 

·                   Interest Coverage Ratio: A minimum interest coverage ratio (defined as, with certain adjustments, the ratio of the Company’s EBITDA to the Company’s consolidated cash interest expense) as of the last day of any fiscal quarter of 2.50 to 1.0.

 

·                   Senior Secured Leverage Ratio: A maximum senior secured leverage ratio (defined as, with certain adjustments, the ratio of the Company’s consolidated secured indebtedness to the Company’s EBITDA) of the following:

 

Fiscal Quarter Ending

 

 

 

March 31, 2012 through September 30, 2012

 

3.00 to 1.0

 

Thereafter

 

2.75 to 1.0

 

 

The Company was in compliance with the financial covenants contained in the Credit Agreement as of March 31, 2012 and expects to be able to meet the financial covenants contained in the Credit Agreement over the next twelve months.

 

Additionally, with certain exceptions, the Credit Agreement limits the ability of the Company to pay dividends and other distributions, including repurchases of stock. However, so long as no event of default exists under the Credit Agreement or would result from such payment, the Company may pay dividends and other distributions in an aggregate amount not exceeding the sum of:

 

(i)

$50 million during any fiscal year; plus

(ii)

the excess of (a) 25% of the cumulative net income of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries for all fiscal quarters ending after September 27, 2010, over (b) the cumulative amount of all such dividends and other distributions made in any fiscal year ending after such date that exceed $50 million; plus

(iii)

for each of the first four fiscal quarters ending after September 27, 2010, $25 million per fiscal quarter, in each case provided that the leverage ratio (as defined) as of the last day of the most recently ended fiscal quarter was less than 2.0 to 1.0; plus

(iv)

for the period of four fiscal quarters ending September 30, 2011 and for each period of four fiscal quarters ending thereafter, $100 million during such period, in each case provided that the leverage ratio (as defined) as of the last day of the most recently ended fiscal quarter was less than 2.0 to 1.0.

 

In March 2010, the Company issued $250.0 million of 8¼% unsecured senior notes due March 1, 2017 and $250.0 million of 8½% unsecured senior notes due March 1, 2020 (collectively, the “Senior Notes”). The Senior Notes were issued pursuant to an indenture (the “Indenture”) among the Company, the subsidiary guarantors named therein and a trustee. The Indenture contains customary affirmative and negative covenants. The Company has the option to redeem the Senior Notes due 2017 and Senior Notes due 2020 for a premium after March 1, 2014 and March 1, 2015, respectively. Certain of the Company’s subsidiaries fully, unconditionally, jointly and severally guarantee the Company’s obligations under the Senior Notes. See Note 20 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for separate financial information of the subsidiary guarantors.

 

The fair value of the long-term debt is estimated based upon the market rate of the Company’s debt. At March 31, 2012, the fair value of the Senior Notes was estimated to be $543 million and the fair value of the Term Loan approximated book value.

 

14



Table of Contents

 

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

9.               Warranties

 

The Company’s products generally carry explicit warranties that extend from six months to five years, based on terms that are generally accepted in the marketplace. Selected components (such as engines, transmissions, tires, etc.) included in the Company’s end products may include manufacturers’ warranties. These manufacturers’ warranties are generally passed on to the end customer of the Company’s products, and the customer would generally deal directly with the component manufacturer.

 

Changes in the Company’s warranty liability were as follows (in millions):

 

 

 

Six Months Ended

 

 

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning balance

 

$

75.0

 

$

90.5

 

Warranty provisions

 

26.8

 

17.1

 

Settlements made

 

(24.2

)

(25.2

)

Changes in liability for pre-existing warranties, net

 

2.6

 

(9.2

)

Foreign currency translation

 

0.7

 

0.3

 

Ending balance

 

$

80.9

 

$

73.5

 

 

Provisions for estimated warranty and other related costs are recorded at the time of sale and are periodically adjusted to reflect actual experience. Actual MRAP All-Terrain Vehicle (“M-ATV”) warranty claims have been lower than the Company expected on the M-ATV product launch, which resulted in reductions in liabilities for pre-existing warranties for the six months ended March 31, 2011. Certain warranty and other related claims involve matters of dispute that ultimately are resolved by negotiation, arbitration or litigation. At times, warranty issues arise that are beyond the scope of the Company’s historical experience. For example, accelerated programs to design, test, manufacture and deploy products such as the M-ATV, in war-time conditions carry with them an increased level of inherent risk of product or component failure. It is reasonably possible that additional warranty and other related claims could arise from disputes or other matters in excess of amounts accrued; however, the Company does not expect that any such amounts, while not determinable, would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, result of operations or cash flows.

 

10.        Guarantee Arrangements

 

In the fire & emergency segment, the Company provides guarantees of certain customers’ obligations under deferred payment contracts and lease payment agreements to third parties. Guarantees provided prior to February 1, 2008 are limited to $1.0 million per year in total. In January 2008, the Company entered into a new guarantee arrangement. Under this arrangement, guarantees are limited to $3.0 million per year for contracts signed after February 1, 2008. These guarantees are mutually exclusive and, until the portfolio under the $1.0 million guarantee is repaid, the Company has exposure of up to $4.0 million per year. Both guarantees are supported by the residual value of the underlying equipment. The Company’s actual losses under these guarantees over the last ten years have been negligible. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 460, Guarantees , the Company has recorded the fair value of all such guarantees issued after January 1, 2003 as a liability and a reduction of the initial revenue recognized on the sale of equipment. Liabilities accrued for guarantees for all periods presented were insignificant.

 

15



Table of Contents

 

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

In the access equipment segment, the Company is party to multiple agreements whereby it guarantees an aggregate of $142.2 million in indebtedness of others, including $125.7 million under loss pool agreements. The Company estimated that its maximum loss exposure under these contracts at March 31, 2012 was $39.9 million. Under the terms of these and various related agreements and upon the occurrence of certain events, the Company generally has the ability to, among other things, take possession of the underlying collateral. If the financial condition of the customers were to deteriorate and result in their inability to make payments, then additional accruals may be required. While the Company does not expect to experience losses under these agreements that are materially in excess of the amounts reserved, it cannot provide any assurance that the financial condition of the third parties will not deteriorate resulting in the third parties’ inability to meet their obligations. In the event that this occurs, the Company cannot guarantee that the collateral underlying the agreements will be sufficient to avoid losses materially in excess of the amounts reserved. Any losses under these guarantees would generally be mitigated by the value of any underlying collateral, including financed equipment, and are generally subject to the finance company’s ability to provide the Company clear title to foreclosed equipment and other conditions. During periods of economic weakness, collateral values generally decline and can contribute to higher exposure to losses.

 

Changes in the consolidated credit guarantee liability were as follows (in millions):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Six Months Ended

 

 

 

March 31,

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning balance

 

$

4.4

 

$

14.1

 

$

6.1

 

$

22.8

 

Provision for new credit guarantees

 

0.4

 

 

0.8

 

0.1

 

Settlements made

 

0.1

 

(0.7

)

(0.5

)

(3.0

)

Changes for pre-existing guarantees, net

 

(0.6

)

(2.6

)

(1.7

)

(8.9

)

Amortization of previous guarantees

 

(0.1

)

(0.8

)

(0.5

)

(1.0

)

Foreign currency translation

 

 

0.1

 

 

0.1

 

Ending balance

 

$

4.2

 

$

10.1

 

$

4.2

 

$

10.1

 

 

In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company reached a settlement with a customer that resulted in the customer’s repayment of $28.3 million of loans supported by Company guarantees for which the Company had established specific credit loss reserves. Upon release of the guarantees, the Company reduced previously accrued reserves and increased pre-tax income by $8.1 million.

 

11.        Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities

 

The Company has used forward foreign currency exchange contracts (“derivatives”) to reduce the exchange rate risk of specific foreign currency denominated transactions. These derivatives typically require the exchange of a foreign currency for U.S. dollars at a fixed rate at a future date. At March 31, 2012, the Company had no forward foreign exchange contracts designated as hedges.

 

The Company has entered into forward foreign currency exchange contracts to create an economic hedge to manage foreign exchange risk exposure associated with non-functional currency denominated payables resulting from global sourcing activities. The Company has not designated these derivative contracts as hedge transactions under FASB ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and accordingly, the mark-to-market impact of these derivatives is recorded each period in current earnings. The fair value of foreign currency related derivatives is included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets in “Other current assets” and “Other current liabilities.” At March 31, 2012, the U.S. dollar equivalent of these outstanding forward foreign exchange contracts totaled $136.1 million in notional amounts, including $75.7 million in contracts to sell Euro, $47.2 million in contracts to sell Australian dollars and $7.5 million in contracts to sell U.K. pounds sterling and buy Euro, with the remaining contracts covering a variety of foreign currencies.

 

16



Table of Contents

 

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

Fair Market Value of Financial Instruments — The fair values of all open derivative instruments in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows (in millions):

 

 

 

March 31, 2012

 

September 30, 2011

 

 

 

Other

 

Other

 

Other

 

Other

 

 

 

Current

 

Current

 

Current

 

Current

 

 

 

Assets

 

Liabilities

 

Assets

 

Liabilities

 

Designated as hedging instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate contracts

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

2.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Not designated as hedging instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign exchange contracts

 

0.7

 

1.3

 

0.8

 

0.2

 

 

 

$

0.7

 

$

1.3

 

$

0.8

 

$

2.3

 

 

The pre-tax effects of derivative instruments on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income consisted of the following (in millions):

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Six Months Ended

 

 

 

Classification of

 

March 31,

 

March 31,

 

 

 

Losses

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

Cash flow hedges:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reclassified from other comprehensive income (effective portion):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate contracts

 

Interest expense

 

$

 

$

(3.0

)

$

(2.2

)

$

(10.5

)

Foreign exchange contracts

 

Cost of sales

 

 

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Not designated as hedges:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign exchange contracts

 

Miscellaneous, net

 

(4.0

)

(4.1

)

(6.9

)

(4.7

)

 

 

 

 

$

(4.0

)

$

(7.1

)

$

(9.1

)

$

(15.3

)

 

12.  Fair Value Measurements

 

FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures , defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. FASB ASC Topic 820 requires disclosures that categorize assets and liabilities measured at fair value into one of three different levels depending on the assumptions (i.e., inputs) used in the valuation. Level 1 provides the most reliable measure of fair value, while Level 3 generally requires significant management judgment. The three levels are defined as follows:

 

Level 1:  Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

 

Level 2:        Observable inputs other than quoted prices other than those included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets.

 

Level 3:  Unobservable inputs reflecting management’s own assumptions about the inputs used in pricing the asset or liability.

 

17



Table of Contents

 

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

There were no transfers of assets between levels during the three months ended March 31, 2012. As of March 31, 2012, the fair values of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities were as follows (in millions):

 

 

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign exchange contracts (a)

 

$

 

$

0.7

 

$

 

$

0.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign exchange contracts (a)

 

$

 

$

1.3

 

$

 

$

1.3

 

 


(a)           Based on observable market transactions of forward currency prices.

 

13.  Stock-Based Compensation

 

In February 2009, the Company’s shareholders approved the 2009 Incentive Stock and Awards Plan. In January 2012, the Company’s shareholders approved amendments to the 2009 Incentive Stock and Awards Plan (as amended, the “2009 Stock Plan”) to add 6,000,000 shares to the number of shares available for issuance under the plan. The 2009 Stock Plan replaced the 2004 Incentive Stock and Awards Plan, as amended (the “2004 Stock Plan”) and 1990 Incentive Stock Plan, as amended (the “1990 Stock Plan”). While no new awards will be granted under the 2004 Stock Plan and 1990 Stock Plan, awards previously made under these two plans that remained outstanding as of the approval date of the 2009 Stock Plan will remain outstanding and continue to be governed by the provisions of those plans.

 

Under the 2009 Stock Plan, officers, directors, including non-employee directors, and employees of the Company may be granted stock options, stock appreciation rights, performance shares, performance units, shares of Common Stock, restricted stock, restricted stock units or other stock-based awards. The 2009 Stock Plan provides for the granting of options to purchase shares of the Company’s Common Stock at not less than the fair market value of such shares on the date of grant. Stock options granted under the 2009 Stock Plan become exercisable in equal installments over a three-year period, beginning with the first anniversary of the date of grant of the option, unless a shorter or longer duration is established by the Human Resources Committee of the Board of Directors at the time of the option grant. Stock options terminate not more than seven years from the date of grant. Except for performance shares and performance units, vesting is based solely on continued service as an employee of the Company. At March 31, 2012, the Company had reserved 11,584,695 shares of Common Stock to provide for the exercise of outstanding stock options and the issuance of Common Stock under incentive compensation awards, including awards issued prior to the effective date of the 2009 Stock Plan.

 

The Company recognizes compensation expense over the requisite service period for vesting of an award, or to an employee’s eligible retirement date, if earlier and applicable. Total stock-based compensation expense included in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended March 31, 2012 was $5.8 million ($3.7 million net of tax) and $10.2 million ($6.5 million net of tax), respectively. Total stock-based compensation expense included in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended March 31, 2011 was $4.2 million ($2.6 million net of tax) and $9.7 million ($6.1 million net of tax), respectively.

 

14.  Restructuring and Other Charges

 

As part of the Company’s actions to rationalize and optimize its global manufacturing footprint and in an effort to streamline operations, the Company announced in September 2010 that it was closing two JerrDan manufacturing facilities and relocating towing and recovery equipment production to other underutilized access equipment segment facilities. The Company largely completed these actions in the first quarter of fiscal 2011.

 

In October 2010, the Company announced that its fire & emergency segment would be closing its Medtec ambulance manufacturing facilities and integrating those operations into existing operations in Florida. Although the Company largely completed this action in the first quarter of fiscal 2011, the Florida facility is operating at higher cost than planned. The Company is in the process of reducing or eliminating such excess operating costs.

 

18



Table of Contents

 

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

In January 2011, the Company initiated a plan to address continued weak market conditions in its access equipment segment in Europe. The plan included the consolidation of certain facilities and other cost reduction initiatives resulting in reductions in its workforce in Europe. In connection with this plan, the Company recorded statutorily or contractually required termination benefit costs in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The Company largely completed these actions in the first quarter of fiscal 2012.

 

Pre-tax restructuring charges (credits) for the three and six months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows (in millions):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended March 31, 2012

 

Six Months Ended March 31, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

Selling,

 

 

 

 

 

Selling,

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of

 

General and

 

 

 

Cost of

 

General and

 

 

 

 

 

Sales

 

Administrative

 

Total

 

Sales

 

Administrative

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Access equipment

 

$

(0.1

)

$

 

$

(0.1

)

$

(0.6

)

$

 

$

(0.6

)

Fire & emergency

 

0.2

 

0.7

 

0.9

 

0.2

 

1.0

 

1.2

 

Commercial

 

0.1

 

 

0.1

 

0.1

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

$

0.2

 

$

0.7

 

$

0.9

 

$

(0.3

)

$

1.0

 

$

0.7

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended March 31, 2011

 

Six Months Ended March 31, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

Selling,

 

 

 

 

 

Selling,

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of

 

General and

 

 

 

Cost of

 

General and

 

 

 

 

 

Sales

 

Administrative

 

Total

 

Sales

 

Administrative

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Access equipment

 

$

(4.5

)

$

(1.3

)

$

(5.8

)

$

4.3

 

$

1.4

 

$

5.7

 

Fire & emergency

 

 

0.7

 

0.7

 

 

1.4

 

1.4

 

Commercial

 

0.1

 

0.3

 

0.4

 

0.1

 

0.3

 

0.4

 

 

 

$

(4.4

)

$

(0.3

)

$

(4.7

)

$

4.4

 

$

3.1

 

$

7.5

 

 

Changes in the Company’s restructuring reserves for the six months ended March 31, 2012, which are included within “Other current liabilities” in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, were as follows (in millions):

 

 

 

Employee

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Severance and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Termination

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benefits

 

Other

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning balance

 

$

3.6

 

$

 

$

3.6

 

Restructuring provisions

 

(0.1

)

0.8

 

0.7

 

Utilized - cash

 

(1.5

)

(0.7

)

(2.2

)

Utilized - noncash

 

 

(0.1

)

(0.1

)

Foreign currency translation

 

(0.1

)

 

(0.1

)

Ending balance

 

$

1.9

 

$

 

$

1.9

 

 

19



Table of Contents

 

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

15.        Employee Benefit Plans

 

Components of net periodic pension benefit cost were as follows (in millions):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Six Months Ended

 

 

 

March 31,

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service cost

 

$

5.5

 

$

4.8

 

$

11.1

 

$

8.9

 

Interest cost

 

4.1

 

3.6

 

8.2

 

6.9

 

Expected return on plan assets

 

(3.9

)

(3.8

)

(7.8

)

(7.7

)

Amortization of prior service cost

 

0.6

 

0.6

 

1.2

 

1.0

 

Amortization of net actuarial loss

 

1.8

 

2.2

 

3.6

 

3.5

 

Net periodic benefit cost

 

$

8.1

 

$

7.4

 

$

16.3

 

$

12.6

 

 

The Company expects to make discretionary contributions of approximately $40.0 million to its pension plans in fiscal 2012 compared to $25.9 million in fiscal 2011.

 

Components of net periodic other post-employment benefit cost were as follows (in millions):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Six Months Ended

 

 

 

March 31,

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service cost

 

$

1.8

 

$

1.2

 

$

3.6

 

$

2.3

 

Interest cost

 

0.8

 

0.7

 

1.7

 

1.5

 

Amortization of net actuarial loss

 

0.3

 

0.2

 

0.6

 

0.5

 

Net periodic benefit cost

 

$

2.9

 

$

2.1

 

$

5.9

 

$

4.3

 

 

The Company made contributions to fund benefit payments of $0.7 million and $0.6 million for the six months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, under its other post-employment benefit plans. The Company estimates that it will make additional contributions of approximately $1.0 million under these other post-employment benefit plans prior to the end of fiscal 2012.

 

16.        Income Taxes

 

The Company’s effective income tax rate was 29.9% and 34.6% for the six months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The effective income tax rate for the six months ended March 31, 2012 was favorably impacted by discrete tax benefits, including the impact of benefits associated with the settlement of foreign tax audits (220 basis points), reductions of tax reserves related to the expiration of statutes of limitations (90 basis points), receipt of interest on refundable taxes (70 basis points) and an adjustment to reflect positions taken on previously filed tax returns (300 basis points). The effective income tax rate for the six months ended March 31, 2011 was favorably impacted by discrete tax benefits, including the impact of benefits associated with foreign tax credits related to a decision to repatriate earnings previously fully reinvested (230 basis points), reductions of tax reserves related to the expiration of statutes of limitations (70 basis points) and the December 2010 reinstatement of the U.S. research and development tax credit (80 basis points). These discrete benefits were partially offset by unbenefitted losses in foreign tax jurisdictions (220 basis points) due to cumulative net operating losses.

 

The Company’s liability for gross unrecognized tax benefits, excluding related interest and penalties, was $52.8 million and $54.4 million as of March 31, 2012 and September 30, 2011, respectively. As of March 31, 2012, net unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, of $41.9 million would affect the Company’s net income if recognized, $21.8 million of which would impact net income from continuing operations.

 

20



Table of Contents

 

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in the “Provision for income taxes” in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. During the six months ended March 31, 2012, the Company recorded interest income on refundable income taxes of $1.2 million and no tax penalties. During the six months ended March 31, 2011, the Company recognized $0.9 million in interest and penalties. At March 31, 2012, the Company had accruals for the payment of interest and penalties of $14.9 million. During the next twelve months, it is reasonably possible that federal, state and foreign tax audit resolutions could reduce unrecognized tax benefits by approximately $9.1 million, because the Company’s tax positions are sustained on audit, because the Company agrees to their disallowance or the applicable statute of limitations closes.

 

The Company files federal income tax returns, as well as multiple state, local and non-U.S. jurisdiction tax returns. The Company is regularly audited by federal, state and foreign tax authorities. At March 31, 2012, the Company was under audit by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service for the taxable years ended September 30, 2008 and 2009, and the state of Wisconsin for the taxable years 2006 through 2009.

 

17.        Earnings Per Share

 

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted weighted-average shares used in the denominator of the per share calculations:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Six Months Ended

 

 

 

March 31,

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic weighted-average shares outstanding

 

91,359,575

 

90,839,750

 

91,272,488

 

90,716,175

 

Effect of dilutive stock options and other equity-based compensation awards

 

583,987

 

964,606

 

557,472

 

921,762

 

Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding

 

91,943,562

 

91,804,356

 

91,829,960

 

91,637,937

 

 

Options to purchase 3,097,327 shares of Common Stock were outstanding during the three and six months ended March 31, 2012, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share attributable to Oshkosh Corporation common shareholders because the exercise price of the options was greater than the average market price of the shares of Common Stock and therefore would have been anti-dilutive. Options to purchase 1,399,955 shares of Common Stock were outstanding during the three and six months ended March 31, 2011, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share attributable to Oshkosh Corporation common shareholders because the exercise price of the options was greater than the average market price of the shares of Common Stock and therefore would have been anti-dilutive.

 

18.        Contingencies, Significant Estimates and Concentrations

 

Environmental - As part of its routine business operations, the Company disposes of and recycles or reclaims certain industrial waste materials, chemicals and solvents at third-party disposal and recycling facilities, which are licensed by appropriate governmental agencies. In some instances, these facilities have been and may be designated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) or a state environmental agency for remediation. Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act and similar state laws, each potentially responsible party (“PRP”) that contributed hazardous substances may be jointly and severally liable for the costs associated with cleaning up these sites. Typically, PRPs negotiate a resolution with the EPA and/or the state environmental agencies. PRPs also negotiate with each other regarding allocation of the cleanup costs.

 

21



Table of Contents

 

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

The Company had reserves of $2.1 million and $2.1 million for losses related to environmental matters that were probable and estimable at March 31, 2012 and September 30, 2011, respectively. The amount recorded for identified contingent liabilities is based on estimates. Amounts recorded are reviewed periodically and adjusted to reflect additional technical and legal information that becomes available. Actual costs incurred in future periods may vary from the estimates, given the inherent uncertainties in evaluating certain exposures. Subject to the imprecision in estimating future contingent liability costs, the Company does not expect that any sum it may have to pay in connection with these matters in excess of the amounts recorded will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

Personal Injury Actions and Other - Product and general liability claims arise against the Company from time to time in the ordinary course of business. The Company is generally self-insured for future claims up to $3.0 million per claim. Accordingly, a reserve is maintained for the estimated costs of such claims. At March 31, 2012 and September 30, 2011, reserves for product and general liability claims were $44.8 million and $41.7 million, respectively, based on available information. There is inherent uncertainty as to the eventual resolution of unsettled claims. Management, however, believes that any losses in excess of established reserves will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

 

Market Risks - The Company was contingently liable under bid, performance and specialty bonds totaling $215.2 million, and open standby letters of credit issued by the Company’s banks in favor of third parties totaling $32.7 million, at March 31, 2012.

 

Other Matters - The Company is subject to other environmental matters and legal proceedings and claims, including patent, antitrust, product liability, warranty and state dealership regulation compliance proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. Although the final results of all such matters and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes that the ultimate resolution of all such matters and claims will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Actual results could vary, among other things, due to the uncertainties involved in litigation.

 

On January 8, 2010, Control Solutions LLC (“Control Solutions”) brought suit against the Company in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois for breach of express contract, breach of implied-in-fact contract, unjust enrichment and promissory estoppel related to the Company’s contract to supply the United States Department of Defense with M-ATVs. Control Solutions has asserted damages in the amount of $190.3 million. On October 3, 2011, following written and oral discovery, the Company moved for summary judgment. On that same date, Control Solutions filed a cross-motion for summary judgment. The Company’s and Control Solutions’ response briefs have been filed with the Court. While this case is in the early stages of litigation and its outcome cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company believes that the ultimate resolution of this case will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Actual results could vary, among other things, due to the uncertainties involved in litigation.

 

While the Family of Medium Tactical Vehicles (“FMTV”) contract was profitable for the first six months of fiscal 2012 and the Company expects the contract to remain profitable throughout the remaining life of the contract, the Company’s expectation of future profitability is based on certain assumptions including estimates of future material and production costs. Management cost assumptions include estimates for future increases in the costs of materials, targeted cost savings and production efficiencies. There are inherent uncertainties related to these estimates. Small changes in estimates can have a significant impact on profitability under the contract. For example, a 1% escalation in material costs over the Company’s projection for FMTV orders currently in backlog would increase the cost of materials by approximately $20 million. While this amount is less than the expected future profitability of the FMTV contract, it would reduce the expected future gross margins on orders currently in backlog. It is possible that other assumptions underlying the analysis could change in such a manner that the Company would determine in the future that this is a loss contract, which could result in a material charge to earnings.

 

19.        Business Segment Information

 

The Company is organized into four reportable segments based on the internal organization used by management for making operating decisions and measuring performance and based on the similarity of customers served, common management, common use of facilities and economic results attained.

 

22



Table of Contents

 

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

For purposes of business segment performance measurement, the Company does not allocate to individual business segments costs or items that are of a non-operating nature or organizational or functional expenses of a corporate nature. The caption “Corporate” includes corporate office expenses, including share-based compensation, and results of insignificant operations. Identifiable assets of the business segments exclude general corporate assets, which principally consist of cash and cash equivalents, certain property, plant and equipment and certain other assets pertaining to corporate activities. Intersegment sales generally include amounts invoiced by a segment for work performed for another segment. Amounts are based on actual work performed and agreed-upon pricing, which is intended to be reflective of the contribution made by the supplying business segment.

 

Selected financial information concerning the Company’s product lines and reportable segments was as follows (in millions):

 

 

 

Three Months Ended March 31, 2012

 

Three Months Ended March 31, 2011

 

 

 

External

 

Inter-

 

Net

 

External

 

Inter-

 

Net

 

 

 

Customers

 

segment

 

Sales

 

Customers

 

segment

 

Sales

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Access equipment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerial work platforms

 

$

406.4

 

$

 

$

406.4

 

$

237.1

 

$

 

$

237.1

 

Telehandlers

 

251.0

 

 

251.0

 

138.1

 

 

138.1

 

Other

 

102.0

 

1.0

 

103.0

 

96.0

 

 

96.0

 

Total access equipment

 

759.4

 

1.0

 

760.4

 

471.2

 

 

471.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Defense

 

986.5

 

0.8

 

987.3

 

971.3

 

1.0

 

972.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fire & emergency

 

170.7

 

10.8

 

181.5

 

172.4

 

4.8

 

177.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Concrete placement

 

52.7

 

 

52.7

 

40.1

 

 

40.1

 

Refuse collection

 

79.7

 

 

79.7

 

72.5

 

 

72.5

 

Other

 

26.3

 

9.0

 

35.3

 

18.1

 

21.0

 

39.1

 

Total commercial

 

158.7

 

9.0

 

167.7

 

130.7

 

21.0

 

151.7

 

Intersegment eliminations

 

 

(21.6

)

(21.6

)

 

(26.8

)

(26.8

)

Consolidated

 

$

2,075.3

 

$

 

$

2,075.3

 

$

1,745.6

 

$

 

$

1,745.6

 

 

 

 

Six Months Ended March 31, 2012

 

Six Months Ended March 31, 2011

 

 

 

External

 

Inter-

 

Net

 

External

 

Inter-

 

Net

 

 

 

Customers

 

segment

 

Sales

 

Customers

 

segment

 

Sales

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Access equipment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerial work platforms

 

$

661.4

 

$

 

$

661.4

 

$

357.0

 

$

 

$

357.0

 

Telehandlers

 

399.4

 

 

399.4

 

223.4

 

 

223.4

 

Other

 

203.7

 

123.6

 

327.3

 

181.4

 

36.7

 

218.1

 

Total access equipment

 

1,264.5

 

123.6

 

1,388.1

 

761.8

 

36.7

 

798.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Defense

 

2,036.7

 

1.6

 

2,038.3

 

2,083.1

 

2.9

 

2,086.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fire & emergency

 

329.0

 

15.5

 

344.5

 

369.5

 

9.2

 

378.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Concrete placement

 

99.4

 

 

99.4

 

74.6

 

 

74.6

 

Refuse collection

 

175.0

 

 

175.0

 

122.7

 

 

122.7

 

Other

 

49.3

 

15.6

 

64.9

 

34.7

 

39.2

 

73.9

 

Total commercial

 

323.7

 

15.6

 

339.3

 

232.0

 

39.2

 

271.2

 

Intersegment eliminations

 

 

(156.3

)

(156.3

)

 

(88.0

)

(88.0

)

Consolidated

 

$

3,953.9

 

$

 

$

3,953.9

 

$

3,446.4

 

$

 

$

3,446.4

 

 

23



Table of Contents

 

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Six Months Ended

 

 

 

March 31,

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

Operating income (loss):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Access equipment

 

$

68.4

 

$

17.7

 

$

81.5

 

$

1.0

 

Defense

 

41.9

 

141.6

 

134.3

 

359.5

 

Fire & emergency

 

(11.3

)

(6.6

)

(21.3

)

(4.0

)

Commercial

 

3.9

 

5.3

 

10.8

 

(2.4

)

Corporate

 

(27.0

)

(25.5

)

(54.1

)

(56.7

)

Intersegment eliminations

 

 

(0.1

)

 

3.7

 

 

 

75.9

 

132.4

 

151.2

 

301.1

 

Interest expense, net of interest income

 

(17.6

)

(20.7

)

(37.6

)

(46.4

)

Miscellaneous, net

 

1.3

 

0.4

 

(4.3

)

0.1

 

Income from operations before income taxes and equity in earnings (losses) of unconcolidated affiliates

 

$

59.6

 

$

112.1

 

$

109.3

 

$

254.8

 

 

 

 

March 31,

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

Identifiable assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Access equipment:

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

$

1,781.0

 

$

1,779.8

 

Europe (a)

 

703.0

 

694.0

 

Rest of the world

 

300.3

 

248.9

 

Total access equipment

 

2,784.3

 

2,722.7

 

Defense - U.S. (a)

 

628.7

 

762.3

 

Fire & emergency:

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

558.1

 

518.9

 

Europe

 

13.4

 

12.9

 

Total fire & emergency

 

571.5

 

531.8

 

Commercial:

 

 

 

 

 

U.S.

 

309.9

 

321.4

 

Other North America (a)

 

42.4

 

41.5

 

Total commercial

 

352.3

 

362.9

 

Corporate:

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. (b)

 

452.3

 

441.2

 

Rest of the world

 

4.1

 

6.0

 

Total corporate

 

456.4

 

447.2

 

Consolidated

 

$

4,793.2

 

$

4,826.9

 

 


(a)          Includes investment in unconsolidated affiliates.

(b)          Primarily includes cash and short-term investments.

 

24



Table of Contents

 

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

Net sales by geographic region based on product shipment destination were as follows (in millions):

 

 

 

Six Months Ended

 

 

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

Net sales:

 

 

 

 

 

United States

 

$

3,167.6

 

$

2,876.0

 

Other North America

 

109.3

 

71.8

 

Europe, Africa and Middle East

 

426.2

 

309.7

 

Rest of the world

 

250.8

 

188.9

 

Consolidated

 

$

3,953.9

 

$

3,446.4

 

 

20.        Separate Financial Information of Subsidiary Guarantors of Indebtedness

 

The Senior Notes are jointly, severally and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by all of Oshkosh Corporation’s existing and future subsidiaries that from time to time guarantee obligations under Oshkosh Corporation’s senior credit facility, with certain exceptions (the “Guarantors”). The following condensed supplemental consolidating financial information reflects the summarized financial information of Oshkosh Corporation, the Guarantors on a combined basis and Oshkosh Corporation’s non-guarantor subsidiaries on a combined basis (in millions):

 

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012

 

 

 

Oshkosh

 

Guarantor

 

Non-Guarantor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporation

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

1,016.0

 

$

857.9

 

$

252.1

 

$

(50.7

)

$

2,075.3

 

Cost of sales

 

944.7

 

714.2

 

227.0

 

(50.0

)

1,835.9

 

Gross income

 

71.3

 

143.7

 

25.1

 

(0.7

)

239.4

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

56.3

 

47.4

 

45.0

 

 

148.7

 

Amortization of purchased intangibles

 

 

10.2

 

4.6

 

 

14.8

 

Operating income (loss)

 

15.0

 

86.1

 

(24.5

)

(0.7

)

75.9

 

Interest expense

 

(45.8

)

(19.9

)

(1.2

)

48.7

 

(18.2

)

Interest income

 

0.6

 

7.6

 

41.1

 

(48.7

)

0.6

 

Miscellaneous, net

 

2.8

 

(56.2

)

54.7

 

 

1.3

 

Income (loss) from operations before income taxes

 

(27.4

)

17.6

 

70.1

 

(0.7

)

59.6

 

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes

 

(6.2

)

4.6

 

23.5

 

(0.3

)

21.6

 

Income (loss) from operations before equity in earnings of affiliates

 

(21.2

)

13.0

 

46.6

 

(0.4

)

38.0

 

Equity in earnings (losses) of consolidated subsidiaries

 

58.7

 

28.5

 

20.2

 

(107.4

)

 

Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates

 

(0.2

)

 

0.2

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

37.3

 

41.5

 

67.0

 

(107.8

)

38.0

 

Net (income) loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest

 

 

 

(0.7

)

 

(0.7

)

Net income (loss) attributable to Oshkosh Corporation

 

$

37.3

 

$

41.5

 

$

66.3

 

$

(107.8

)

$

37.3

 

 

25



Table of Contents

 

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011

 

 

 

Oshkosh

 

Guarantor

 

Non-Guarantor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporation

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

1,004.9

 

$

553.7

 

$

227.9

 

$

(40.9

)

$

1,745.6

 

Cost of sales

 

834.1

 

477.9

 

193.3

 

(40.8

)

1,464.5

 

Gross income

 

170.8

 

75.8

 

34.6

 

(0.1

)

281.1

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

52.6

 

45.1

 

36.0

 

 

133.7

 

Amortization of purchased intangibles

 

 

9.8

 

5.2

 

 

15.0

 

Operating income (loss)

 

118.2

 

20.9

 

(6.6

)

(0.1

)

132.4

 

Interest expense

 

(50.0

)

(22.1

)

(0.9

)

51.3

 

(21.7

)

Interest income

 

0.9

 

6.2

 

45.2

 

(51.3

)

1.0

 

Miscellaneous, net

 

3.4

 

(32.1

)

29.1

 

 

0.4

 

Income (loss) from operations before income taxes

 

72.5

 

(27.1

)

66.8

 

(0.1

)

112.1

 

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes

 

31.2

 

(11.2

)

24.2

 

 

44.2

 

Income (loss) from operations before equity in earnings of affiliates

 

41.3

 

(15.9

)

42.6

 

(0.1

)

67.9

 

Equity in earnings (losses) of consolidated subsidiaries

 

26.6

 

13.4

 

(11.1

)

(28.9

)

 

Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

 

(0.2

)

 

(0.2

)

Net income (loss)

 

67.9

 

(2.5

)

31.3

 

(29.0

)

67.7

 

Net (income) loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

0.2

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Oshkosh Corporation

 

$

67.9

 

$

(2.5

)

$

31.5

 

$

(29.0

)

$

67.9

 

 

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income

For the Six Months Ended March 31, 2012

 

 

 

Oshkosh

 

Guarantor

 

Non-Guarantor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporation

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

2,086.8

 

$

1,600.2

 

$

467.1

 

$

(200.2

)

$

3,953.9

 

Cost of sales

 

1,895.4

 

1,381.8

 

414.2

 

(199.4

)

3,492.0

 

Gross income

 

191.4

 

218.4

 

52.9

 

(0.8

)

461.9

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

110.9

 

87.1

 

83.0

 

 

281.0

 

Amortization of purchased intangibles

 

0.1

 

20.2

 

9.4

 

 

29.7

 

Operating income (loss)

 

80.4

 

111.1

 

(39.5

)

(0.8

)

151.2

 

Interest expense

 

(93.9

)

(39.4

)

(2.2

)

96.7

 

(38.8

)

Interest income

 

1.1

 

15.1

 

81.7

 

(96.7

)

1.2

 

Miscellaneous, net

 

4.9

 

(91.2

)

82.0

 

 

(4.3

)

Income (loss) from operations before income taxes

 

(7.5

)

(4.4

)

122.0

 

(0.8

)

109.3

 

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes

 

(2.0

)

(2.6

)

37.6

 

(0.3

)

32.7

 

Income (loss) from operations before equity in earnings of affiliates

 

(5.5

)

(1.8

)

84.4

 

(0.5

)

76.6

 

Equity in earnings (losses) of consolidated subsidiaries

 

81.9

 

48.9

 

13.7

 

(144.5

)

 

Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates

 

(0.2

)

 

0.9

 

 

0.7

 

Net income (loss)

 

76.2

 

47.1

 

99.0

 

(145.0

)

77.3

 

Net (income) loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest

 

 

 

(1.1

)

 

(1.1

)

Net income (loss) attributable to Oshkosh Corporation

 

$

76.2

 

$

47.1

 

$

97.9

 

$

(145.0

)

$

76.2

 

 

26



Table of Contents

 

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income

For the Six Months Ended March 31, 2011

 

 

 

Oshkosh

 

Guarantor

 

Non-Guarantor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporation

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

2,164.6

 

$

973.2

 

$

423.1

 

$

(114.5

)

$

3,446.4

 

Cost of sales

 

1,749.0

 

848.0

 

377.7

 

(118.4

)

2,856.3

 

Gross income

 

415.6

 

125.2

 

45.4

 

3.9

 

590.1

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

107.1

 

86.6

 

65.0

 

 

258.7

 

Amortization of purchased intangibles

 

 

19.9

 

10.4

 

 

30.3

 

Operating income (loss)

 

308.5

 

18.7

 

(30.0

)

3.9

 

301.1

 

Interest expense

 

(104.8

)

(44.7

)

(2.1

)

103.4

 

(48.2

)

Interest income

 

1.7

 

12.8

 

90.7

 

(103.4

)

1.8

 

Miscellaneous, net

 

5.7

 

(56.0

)

50.4

 

 

0.1

 

Income (loss) from operations before income taxes

 

211.1

 

(69.2

)

109.0

 

3.9

 

254.8

 

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes

 

68.1

 

(21.7

)

40.4

 

1.4

 

88.2

 

Income (loss) from operations before equity in earnings of affiliates

 

143.0

 

(47.5

)

68.6

 

2.5

 

166.6

 

Equity in earnings (losses) of consolidated subsidiaries

 

24.5

 

12.9

 

(42.5

)

5.1

 

 

Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates

 

 

 

0.2

 

 

0.2

 

Net income (loss)

 

167.5

 

(34.6

)

26.3

 

7.6

 

166.8

 

Net (income) loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest

 

 

 

0.7

 

 

0.7

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Oshkosh Corporation

 

$

167.5

 

$

(34.6

)

$

27.0

 

$

7.6

 

$

167.5

 

 

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

As of March 31, 2012

 

 

 

Oshkosh

 

Guarantor

 

Non-Guarantor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporation

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Total

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

340.0

 

$

6.6

 

$

41.8

 

$

 

$

388.4

 

Receivables, net

 

489.8

 

488.8

 

179.8

 

(43.1

)

1,115.3

 

Inventories, net

 

139.9

 

449.6

 

262.1

 

(2.3

)

849.3

 

Other current assets

 

65.1

 

39.0

 

23.3

 

 

127.4

 

Total current assets

 

1,034.8

 

984.0

 

507.0

 

(45.4

)

2,480.4

 

Investment in and advances to consolidated subsidiaries

 

2,504.4

 

(1,372.1

)

3,023.7

 

(4,156.0

)

 

Intangible assets, net

 

2.6

 

1,130.2

 

720.0

 

 

1,852.8

 

Other long-term assets

 

155.0

 

151.7

 

153.3

 

 

460.0

 

Total assets

 

$

3,696.8

 

$

893.8

 

$

4,404.0

 

$

(4,201.4

)

$

4,793.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

402.9

 

$

272.4

 

$

119.5

 

$

(37.4

)

$

757.4

 

Customer advances

 

238.6

 

174.5

 

7.2

 

 

420.3

 

Other current liabilities

 

170.3

 

167.1

 

81.1

 

(8.0

)

410.5

 

Total current liabilities

 

811.8

 

614.0

 

207.8

 

(45.4

)

1,588.2

 

Long-term debt, less current maturities

 

987.5

 

 

0.2

 

 

987.7

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

206.2

 

154.9

 

164.9

 

 

526.0

 

Equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oshkosh Corporation shareholders’ equity

 

1,690.1

 

124.9

 

4,029.9

 

(4,154.8

)

1,690.1

 

Noncontrolling interest

 

1.2

 

 

1.2

 

(1.2

)

1.2

 

Total equity

 

1,691.3

 

124.9

 

4,031.1

 

(4,156.0

)

1,691.3

 

Total liabilities and equity

 

$

3,696.8

 

$

893.8

 

$

4,404.0

 

$

(4,201.4

)

$

4,793.2

 

 

27



Table of Contents

 

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

As of September 30, 2011

 

 

 

Oshkosh

 

Guarantor

 

Non-Guarantor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporation

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Total

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

376.3

 

$

13.5

 

$

38.7

 

$

 

$

428.5

 

Receivables, net

 

525.8

 

521.4

 

135.8

 

(93.9

)

1,089.1

 

Inventories, net

 

194.0

 

336.8

 

257.9

 

(1.9

)

786.8

 

Other current assets

 

86.0

 

34.8

 

29.4

 

 

150.2

 

Total current assets

 

1,182.1

 

906.5

 

461.8

 

(95.8

)

2,454.6

 

Investment in and advances to consolidated subsidiaries

 

2,506.5

 

(1,402.6

)

2,902.4

 

(4,006.3

)

 

Intangible assets, net

 

2.7

 

1,131.4

 

746.1

 

 

1,880.2

 

Other long-term assets

 

167.4

 

156.6

 

168.1

 

 

492.1

 

Total assets

 

$

3,858.7

 

$

791.9

 

$

4,278.4

 

$

(4,102.1

)

$

4,826.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

498.6

 

$

298.7

 

$

61.3

 

$

(89.7

)

$

768.9

 

Customer advances

 

334.8

 

120.2

 

13.6

 

 

468.6

 

Other current liabilities

 

208.3

 

167.1

 

85.0

 

(6.1

)

454.3

 

Total current liabilities

 

1,041.7

 

586.0

 

159.9

 

(95.8

)

1,691.8

 

Long-term debt, less current maturities

 

1,020.0

 

 

 

 

1,020.0

 

Other long-term liabilities

 

200.4

 

172.4

 

145.7

 

 

518.5

 

Equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oshkosh Corporation shareholders’ equity

 

1,596.5

 

33.5

 

3,972.7

 

(4,006.2

)

1,596.5

 

Noncontrolling interest

 

0.1

 

 

0.1

 

(0.1

)

0.1

 

Total equity

 

1,596.6

 

33.5

 

3,972.8

 

(4,006.3

)

1,596.6

 

Total liabilities and equity

 

$

3,858.7

 

$

791.9

 

$

4,278.4

 

$

(4,102.1

)

$

4,826.9

 

 

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

For the Six Months Ended March 31, 2012

 

 

 

Oshkosh

 

Guarantor

 

Non-Guarantor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporation

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided (used) by operating activities

 

$

(40.1

)

$

(16.7

)

$

103.7

 

$

 

$

46.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additions to property, plant and equipment

 

(12.0

)

(7.7

)

(4.4

)

 

(24.1

)

Additions to equipment held for rental

 

 

 

(3.1

)

 

(3.1

)

Intercompany investing

 

81.2

 

28.7

 

(96.9

)

(13.0

)

 

Other investing activities

 

5.2

 

1.0

 

1.6

 

 

7.8

 

Net cash provided (used) by investing activities

 

74.4

 

22.0

 

(102.8

)

(13.0

)

(19.4

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Repayment of long-term debt

 

(72.5

)

 

 

 

(72.5

)

Net repayments under revolving credit facility

 

 

 

 

 

 

Intercompany financing

 

(0.6

)

(13.0

)

0.6

 

13.0

 

 

Other financing activities

 

2.5

 

 

0.2

 

 

2.7

 

Net cash provided (used) by financing activities

 

(70.6

)

(13.0

)

0.8

 

13.0

 

(69.8

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

 

 

0.8

 

1.4

 

 

2.2

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

(36.3

)

(6.9

)

3.1

 

 

(40.1

)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 

376.3

 

13.5

 

38.7

 

 

428.5

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 

$

340.0

 

$

6.6

 

$

41.8

 

$

 

$

388.4

 

 

28



Table of Contents

 

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

 

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

For the Six Months Ended March 31, 2011

 

 

 

Oshkosh

 

Guarantor

 

Non-Guarantor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporation

 

Subsidiaries

 

Subsidiaries

 

Eliminations

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided (used) by operating activities

 

$

90.1

 

$

61.1

 

$

105.4

 

$

 

$

256.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additions to property, plant and equipment

 

(17.5

)

(8.8

)

(4.7

)

 

(31.0

)

Additions to equipment held for rental

 

 

 

(3.1

)

 

(3.1

)

Intercompany investing

 

154.1

 

(37.1

)

(103.4

)

(13.6

)

 

Other investing activities

 

(0.2

)

0.1

 

7.5

 

 

7.4

 

Net cash provided (used) by investing activities

 

136.4

 

(45.8

)

(103.7

)

(13.6

)

(26.7

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Repayment of long-term debt

 

(65.2

)

(0.1

)

 

 

(65.3

)

Net repayments under revolving credit facility

 

(100.0

)

 

 

 

(100.0

)

Intercompany financing

 

(0.6

)

(13.0

)

 

13.6

 

 

Other financing activities

 

8.8

 

 

 

 

8.8

 

Net cash provided (used) by financing activities

 

(157.0

)

(13.1

)

 

13.6

 

(156.5

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

 

 

0.2

 

4.1

 

 

4.3

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

69.5

 

2.4

 

5.8

 

 

77.7

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 

202.2

 

2.5

 

134.3

 

 

339.0

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 

$

271.7

 

$

4.9

 

$

140.1

 

$

 

$

416.7

 

 

29



Table of Contents

 

ITEM 2.                              MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Cautionary Statement About Forward-Looking Statements

 

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Consolidated Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other sections of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contain statements that Oshkosh Corporation (the “Company”) believes to be “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including, without limitation, statements regarding the Company’s future financial position, business strategy, targets, projected sales, costs, earnings, capital expenditures, debt levels and cash flows, and plans and objectives of management for future operations, including those under the caption “Executive Overview,” are forward-looking statements. When used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “should,” “project” or “plan” or the negative thereof or variations thereon or similar terminology are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors, some of which are beyond the Company’s control, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors, some of which are beyond the Company’s control, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These factors include the cyclical nature of the Company’s access equipment, commercial and fire & emergency markets; the expected level and timing of the U.S. Department of Defense (“DoD”) procurement of products and services and funding thereof; risks related to reductions in government expenditures in light of U.S. defense budget pressures and an uncertain DoD tactical wheeled vehicle strategy; increasing commodity and other raw material costs, particularly in a sustained economic recovery; the ability to increase prices to offset higher input costs; risks related to facilities consolidation and alignment, including costs and charges thereof and that anticipated cost savings may not be achieved; the Company’s ability to produce vehicles under the Family of Medium Tactical Vehicles (“FMTV”) contract at targeted margins; the duration of the ongoing global economic weakness, which could lead to additional impairment charges related to many of the Company’s intangible assets and/or a slower recovery in the Company’s cyclical businesses than Company or equity market expectations; the potential for the U.S. government to competitively bid the Company’s Army and Marine Corps contracts; the consequences of financial leverage, which could limit the Company’s ability to pursue various opportunities; risks related to the collectability of receivables, particularly for those businesses with exposure to construction markets; the cost of any warranty campaigns related to the Company’s products; risks related to production or shipment delays arising from quality or production issues; risks associated with international operations and sales, including foreign currency fluctuations and compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; risks related to actions of activist shareholders; and the Company’s ability to successfully execute on its strategic road map and meet its long-term financial goals. Additional information concerning these and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements is contained from time to time in the Company’s U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings, including, but not limited to, the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 26, 2012 and Item 1A. of Part II of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

 

All forward-looking statements, including those under the caption “Executive Overview,” speak only as of the date the Company files this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q with the SEC. The Company assumes no obligation, and disclaims any obligation, to update information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Investors should be aware that the Company may not update such information until the Company’s next quarterly earnings conference call, if at all.

 

All references herein to earnings per share refer to earnings per share assuming dilution.

 

General

 

Major products manufactured and marketed by each of the Company’s business segments are as follows:

 

Access equipment — aerial work platforms and telehandlers used in a wide variety of construction, industrial, institutional and general maintenance applications to position workers and materials at elevated heights, as well as wreckers and carriers. Access equipment customers include equipment rental companies, construction contractors, manufacturing companies, home improvement centers, the U.S. military and towing companies in the U.S. and abroad.

 

Defense — tactical trucks and supply parts and services sold to the U.S. military and to other militaries around the world.

 

30



Table of Contents

 

Fire & emergency — custom and commercial firefighting vehicles and equipment, aircraft rescue and firefighting vehicles, snow removal vehicles, ambulances and other emergency vehicles primarily sold to fire departments, airports and other governmental units, mobile medical trailers sold to hospitals and third-party medical service providers in Europe and broadcast vehicles sold to broadcasters and TV stations in North America and abroad.

 

Commercial — concrete mixers, refuse collection vehicles, portable and stationary concrete batch plants and vehicle components sold to ready-mix companies and commercial and municipal waste haulers in the Americas and other international markets and field service vehicles and truck-mounted cranes sold to mining, construction and other companies in the U.S. and abroad.

 

Executive Overview

 

The Company reported that earnings per share declined to $0.41 for the second quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to $0.74 in the second quarter of fiscal 2011. While consolidated sales increased $329.7 million, or 18.9%, on strong replacement driven demand for aerial work platforms and telehandlers, a shift in defense segment sales mix from higher margin Family of Heavy Tactical Vehicles (“FHTV”) and aftermarket parts to lower margin FMTVs resulted in a decline in operating income and earnings per share. Margins on sales under the FMTV program continued to show improvement in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2012. Margins on this program remained at low, single digits, and the Company expects margins on this program to remain well below historical margin levels of the defense segment through the life of the five-year contract.

 

Access equipment sales continued to rebound, increasing $289.2 million, or 61.4%, in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2011, primarily on replacement demand in North America. In North America, higher equipment utilization, rental rates and used equipment values made it more cost effective for the Company’s customers to replace older equipment. The Company continued to experience strength in South America and Australia, driven by continued product adoption, along with economic and infrastructure driven demand. The European access equipment market, while still cautious due to economic concerns, has exhibited more positive signs than the Company experienced in previous quarters. In addition, previously announced price increases began to offset higher material costs in the second quarter of fiscal 2012, contributing to significantly higher operating income margins in this segment. The Company believes that it will realize more of the previously announced price increases in the remainder of fiscal 2012.

 

The Company continued to incur costs and inefficiencies in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 related to the consolidation of manufacturing facilities in its fire & emergency segment, although at lower levels than experienced in previous quarters. The Company is actively working to eliminate these costs and inefficiencies.

 

The Company continues to believe that fiscal 2012 will be a transitional period for the Company. Similar to previous expectations, and consistent with the first six months of fiscal 2012, the Company expects the benefit of a recovery in the access equipment segment to be more than offset by a significant adverse product sales mix shift in the defense segment resulting in significantly lower operating income and net income in fiscal 2012 compared to fiscal 2011. The Company continues to invest in the implementation and execution of its MOVE strategy, which the Company expects will benefit operating results beginning in fiscal 2013.

 

While the FMTV contract was profitable for the first six months of fiscal 2012 and the Company expects the contract to remain profitable throughout the remaining life of the contract, the Company’s expectation of future profitability is based on certain assumptions including estimates of future material and production costs. Management cost assumptions include estimates for future increases in the costs of materials, targeted cost savings and production efficiencies. There are inherent uncertainties related to these estimates. Small changes in estimates can have a significant impact on profitability under the contract. For example, a 1% escalation in material costs over the Company’s projection for FMTV orders currently in backlog would increase the cost of materials by approximately $20 million. While this amount is less than the expected future profitability of the FMTV contract, it would reduce the expected future gross margins on orders currently in backlog. It is possible that other assumptions underlying the analysis could change in such a manner that the Company would determine in the future that this is a loss contract, which could result in a material charge to earnings.

 

The Company believes that diluted earnings per share in the last six months of fiscal 2012 will be modestly higher than the first six months of fiscal 2012, with the third quarter generally being stronger than the fourth quarter due to seasonality in the access equipment segment and to a lesser extent in the commercial segment.

 

31



Table of Contents

 

The Company believes that access equipment segment sales will be approximately 35% to 40% higher in fiscal 2012 compared to fiscal 2011. The Company believes that operating income margins in the access equipment segment will improve modestly in the second half of fiscal 2012 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2012, leading to operating income margins in the 7.5% to 8.0% range for fiscal 2012.

 

The Company believes fiscal 2012 sales in the defense segment will decline approximately 10% to 15% compared to fiscal 2011. The Company expects fiscal 2012 defense segment operating income margins to be nearly 5%.

 

The Company believes that fire & emergency segment sales will be up slightly in fiscal 2012 compared to fiscal 2011. Backlog in this segment supports significantly higher sales levels in the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2012 versus the first two quarters of fiscal 2012. The Company expects operating income in this segment to be approximately breakeven for fiscal 2012 reflecting the benefit of higher sales in the second half of the year and improved operating efficiencies.

 

The Company expects commercial segment fiscal 2012 sales to be up approximately 15% compared to fiscal 2011 and operating income margins to be in the low single digits.

 

The Company expects corporate expenses will be slightly higher in fiscal 2012 compared to fiscal 2011 due to costs related to the proxy contest in connection with the Company’s 2012 annual shareholders’ meeting. The Company expects lower interest expense reflecting the expiration of the Company’s interest rate swap in December 2011 and lower debt levels. The Company expects its income tax rate for fiscal 2012 to approximate 32% to 34%. The Company believes capital expenditures for the year will be between $75 million and $85 million, down from its previous estimate of $85 million to $95 million.

 

Results of Operations

 

Analysis of Consolidated Net Sales

 

The following table presents net sales by business segment (in millions):

 

 

 

Second Quarter Fiscal

 

First Six Months Fiscal

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

Net sales:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Access equipment

 

$

760.4

 

$

471.2

 

$

1,388.1

 

$

798.5

 

Defense

 

987.3

 

972.3

 

2,038.3

 

2,086.0

 

Fire & emergency

 

181.5

 

177.2

 

344.5

 

378.7

 

Commercial

 

167.7

 

151.7

 

339.3

 

271.2

 

Intersegment eliminations

 

(21.6

)

(26.8

)

(156.3

)

(88.0

)

Consolidated

 

$

2,075.3

 

$

1,745.6

 

$

3,953.9

 

$

3,446.4

 

 

Second Quarter Fiscal 2012 Compared to 2011

 

Consolidated net sales increased 18.9% to $2.08 billion for the second quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2011. Increased replacement driven demand for aerial work platforms and telehandlers in the access equipment segment and higher defense segment FMTV sales were offset in part by the expected decline in sales of FHTVs and aftermarket parts, also in the defense segment.

 

Access equipment segment net sales increased 61.4% to $760.4 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2011 principally as a result of higher unit volumes ($241.9 million) and the realization of previously announced price increases. Sales grew by double-digit percentages compared to the prior year quarter in all major regions of the globe, with the largest increase in North America, driven largely by demand for replacement of aged equipment.

 

Defense segment net sales increased 1.5% to $987.3 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2011. The increase was primarily due to higher FMTV sales ($394.0 million increase) offset in part by lower FHTV sales ($219.0 million decrease) and lower aftermarket parts sales ($113.7 million decrease).

 

32



Table of Contents

 

Fire & emergency segment net sales increased 2.4% to $181.5 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2011. The increase in sales primarily reflected increased intersegment production for the defense segment.

 

Commercial segment net sales increased 10.6% to $167.7 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2011. The increase in sales was primarily attributable to increased demand for aftermarket parts & service ($7.4 million increase), an almost 60% increase in concrete placement vehicle unit sales from very low prior year volumes and a 25% increase in refuse collection vehicle unit sales compared to the prior year quarter, offset in part by lower intersegment production for the defense segment ($11.9 million reduction).

 

First Six Months of Fiscal 2012 Compared to 2011

 

Consolidated net sales increased 14.7% to $3.95 billion for the first six months of fiscal 2012 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2011. Higher FMTV sales and an increase in demand for aerial work platforms and telehandlers were offset in part by expected declines in sales of FHTV vehicles and defense aftermarket parts and service.

 

Access equipment segment net sales increased 73.8% to $1.39 billion for the first six months of fiscal 2012 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2011. Sales to external customers totaled $1.26 billion for the first six months of fiscal 2012, a 65.9% increase compared to the first six months of fiscal 2011. The Company realized double-digit sales increases in all regions of the world and across all product lines, generally as a result of replacement of aged equipment in North America and parts of Europe, as well as economic growth and increased product adoption in emerging markets. In addition, sales included $123.6 million in intersegment MRAP All-Terrain Vehicle (M-ATV) related sales in the first six months fiscal 2012 compared to $36.7 million in the first six months of fiscal 2011.

 

Defense segment net sales decreased 2.3% to $2.04 billion for the first six months of fiscal 2012 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2011. The decrease was primarily due to reductions in FHTV volume ($380.5 million reduction) and aftermarket parts and service sales ($368.3 million reduction) offset in part by higher FMTV volume ($690.4 million increase). The Company began initial low rate production under the FMTV contract in the first quarter of fiscal 2011.

 

Fire & emergency segment net sales decreased 9.0% to $344.5 million for the first six months of fiscal 2012 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2011. The decrease in sales primarily reflected lower shipments of airport products ($31.2 million decrease). Revenues for the first six months of fiscal 2011 included the sale of 24 aircraft rescue and firefighting vehicles to airports in Pakistan.

 

Commercial segment net sales increased 25.1% to $339.3 million for the first six months of fiscal 2012 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2011. The increase in sales was primarily the result of a $52.3 million increase in refuse collection vehicle volume partially resulting from the expiration of a U.S. bonus tax depreciation deduction at the end of calendar 2011.

 

Analysis of Consolidated Cost of Sales

 

Second Quarter 2012 Compared to 2011

 

Consolidated cost of sales increased to $1.84 billion, or 88.5% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to $1.46 billion, or 83.9% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2011. The 460 basis point increase in cost of sales as a percentage of sales in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 was generally due to adverse product mix, largely in the defense segment (470 basis points), and material cost increases in excess of price increases (150 basis points), offset in part by higher absorption of fixed costs associated with higher sales (170 basis points).

 

First Six Months 2012 Compared to 2011

 

Consolidated cost of sales increased to $3.49 billion, or 88.3% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2012 compared to $2.86 billion, or 82.9% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2011. The 540 basis point increase in cost of sales as a percentage of sales in the first six months of fiscal 2012 was generally due to adverse product mix, largely in the defense segment (540 basis points), and material cost increases in excess of price increases (130 basis points), offset in part by higher absorption of fixed costs associated with higher sales (150 basis points).

 

33



Table of Contents

 

Analysis of Consolidated Operating Income

 

The following table presents operating income by business segment (in millions):

 

 

 

Second Quarter Fiscal

 

First Six Months Fiscal

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

Operating income (loss):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Access equipment

 

$

68.4

 

$

17.7

 

$

81.5

 

$

1.0

 

Defense

 

41.9

 

141.6

 

134.3

 

359.5

 

Fire & emergency

 

(11.3

)

(6.6

)

(21.3

)

(4.0

)

Commercial

 

3.9

 

5.3

 

10.8

 

(2.4

)

Corporate

 

(27.0

)

(25.5

)

(54.1

)

(56.7

)

Intersegment eliminations

 

 

(0.1

)

 

3.7

 

Consolidated

 

$

75.9

 

$

132.4

 

$

151.2

 

$

301.1

 

 

Second Quarter Fiscal 2012 Compared to 2011

 

Consolidated operating income decreased 42.7% to $75.9  million, or 3.7% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to $132.4 million, or 7.6% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2011. Increased earnings on higher access equipment segment sales were more than offset by lower defense segment earnings that resulted from an adverse sales mix.

 

Access equipment segment operating income increased 285.3% to $68.4 million, or 9.0% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to $17.7 million, or 3.8% of sales, in the prior year quarter. The improvement in operating results primarily reflected higher volume and improved product mix (combined increase of $74.4 million), the realization of previously announced price increases ($31.6 million) and improved absorption related to higher sales volume ($8.7 million), offset by higher raw material costs ($46.4 million) and increased new product development spending ($6.6 million).

 

Defense segment operating income decreased 70.4% to $41.9 million, or 4.2% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to $141.6 million, or 14.6% of sales, in the prior year quarter. The decrease in operating income as a percentage of sales compared to the prior year quarter reflected adverse changes in the product sales mix. Benefits of revenue and cost estimate changes of $15.2 million recognized in the second quarter of fiscal 2011 on undefinitized M-ATV change orders also adversely impacted comparisons to the prior year period. The Company recorded higher profit margins on the FMTV program during the second quarter compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2012, although the profit margins remained in the low single digits.

 

The fire & emergency segment reported an operating loss of $11.3  million, or 6.2% of sales, for the second quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to an operating loss of $6.6 million, or 3.7% of sales, in the prior year quarter. Operating results for the second quarter of fiscal 2012 included charges and severance costs totaling $2.4 million related to exiting the U.S. mobile medical trailer product line and workforce reductions at Pierce, as well as $2.6 million of litigation and environmental remediation charges. Operating results during the second quarter of fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011 were also negatively impacted by $2.9 million and $2.6 million, respectively, as a result of inefficiencies related to the transition of ambulance production to the Company’s facilities in Florida.

 

Commercial segment operating income decreased 27.7% to $3.9 million, or 2.3% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to $5.3 million, or 3.5% of sales, in the prior year quarter. The decrease in operating income primarily resulted from weaker overhead absorption on lower production volumes while certain production lines were reconfigured ($3.0 million), and higher personnel costs largely due to the elimination of employee furloughs ($1.7 million), offset in part by earnings on the higher sales volume.

 

Corporate operating expenses increased $1.5 million to $27.0 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2011. Corporate operating expenses in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 included $3.6 million of costs related to the proxy contest in connection with the Company’s 2012 annual shareholders’ meeting.

 

34



Table of Contents

 

Consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses increased 11.3% to $148.7 million, or 7.2% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to $133.7 million, or 7.7% of sales, in the second quarter of fiscal 2011. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was due primarily to higher salary and fringe benefits ($7.8 million) and costs related to the proxy contest ($3.6 million). The decrease in consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales was largely due to the increase in sales on a relatively fixed cost base.

 

First Six Months Fiscal 2012 Compared to 2011

 

Consolidated operating income decreased 49.8% to $151.2  million, or 3.8% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2012 compared to $301.1 million, or 8.7% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2011. The decrease in consolidated operating income was primarily attributable to the defense segment, where an adverse sales mix negatively impacted operating income comparisons, offset in part by increased earnings on higher access equipment segment sales.

 

Access equipment segment operating income increased to $81.5 million, or 5.9% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2012 compared to $1.0 million, or 0.1% of sales, in the prior year period. The increase in operating income was primarily due to higher sales to external customers ($109.1 million) and realization of price increases ($41.1 million), offset by an increase in raw material costs ($71.3 million) and increased product development spending ($15.6 million).

 

Defense segment operating income decreased 62.6% to $134.3 million, or 6.6% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2012 compared to $359.5 million, or 17.2% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2011. The decrease in operating income as a percentage of sales reflected an adverse change in the product mix.

 

The fire & emergency segment reported an operating loss of $21.3  million, or 6.2% of sales, for the first six months of fiscal 2012 compared to an operating loss of $4.0 million, or 1.1% of sales, in the prior year period. Operating results during the first six months of fiscal 2012 were negatively impacted by lower sales volume, a more competitive pricing environment and higher material costs, as well as costs of $7.7 million related to the transition of ambulance production to the Company’s facilities in Florida, $2.4 million related to exiting the U.S. mobile medical trailer product line and workforce reductions at Pierce, and $2.9 million of litigation and environmental remediation charges. Costs to transition ambulance production to the Company’s facilities in Florida were $4.2 million in the first six months of fiscal 2011.

 

The commercial segment generated operating income of $10.8 million, or 3.2% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2012 compared to an operating loss of $2.4 million, or 0.9% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2011. Of the $13.2 million improvement in operating results, approximately $8.5 million related to higher sales volumes and improved product mix.

 

Corporate operating expenses decreased $2.6 million to $54.1 million in the first six months of fiscal 2012 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2011. The decrease in corporate operating expenses was primarily the result of lower spending after allocations of costs to the segments, offset in part by $6.4 million of costs related to the proxy contest in connection with the Company’s 2012 annual meeting of shareholders in the first six months of fiscal 2012.

 

Consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses increased 8.6% to $281.0 million, or 7.1% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2012 compared to $258.7 million, or 7.5% of sales, in the first six months of fiscal 2011. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was due primarily to higher salary and fringe benefits ($5.8 million), higher costs associated with international expansion and costs related to the proxy contest ($6.4 million). The decrease in consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales was largely due to the increase in sales on a relatively fixed cost base.

 

Intersegment profit of $3.7 million in the first six months of fiscal 2011 resulted from profit on intercompany sales between segments (largely M-ATV related sales between access equipment and defense). To the extent that the purchasing segment sells the inventory to an outside party, previously deferred intersegment profits are recognized in consolidated earnings through intersegment profit eliminations.

 

35



Table of Contents

 

Analysis of Non-Operating Income Statement Items

 

Second Quarter Fiscal 2012 Compared to 2011

 

Interest expense net of interest income decreased $3.1 million to $17.6 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2011, largely as a result of the expiration of the Company’s interest rate swap in December 2011. In the second quarter of fiscal 2011, interest expense included $3.0 million of expense related to the Company’s interest rate swap. Average debt outstanding decreased from $1.09 billion during the second quarter of fiscal 2011 to $1.00 billion during the second quarter of fiscal 2012.

 

The Company recorded a provision for income taxes of 36.2% of pre-tax income in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to 39.5% in the prior year quarter. Second quarter fiscal 2011 results included unbenefitted losses in foreign tax jurisdictions, which increased the effective income tax rate for the period by approximately 250 basis points.

 

Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates of $(0.2) million in the second quarter of fiscal 2011 primarily represented the Company’s equity interest in a lease financing partnership, a commercial entity in Mexico and a joint venture in Europe.

 

First Six Months Fiscal 2012 Compared to 2011

 

Interest expense net of interest income decreased $8.8 million to $37.6 million in the first six months of fiscal 2012 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2011, largely as a result of the expiration of the Company’s interest rate swap in December 2011. In the first six months of fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, interest expense included $2.2 million and $10.5 million, respectively, of expense related to the Company’s interest rate swap. Average debt outstanding decreased from $1.12 billion during the first six months of fiscal 2011 to $1.02 billion during the first six months of fiscal 2012.

 

The Company recorded a provision for income taxes of 29.9% of pre-tax income in the first six months of fiscal 2012 compared to 34.6% for the first six months of fiscal 2011. The effective tax rate for the first six months of fiscal 2012 was favorably impacted by discrete tax benefits including the impact of benefits associated with foreign tax audits (220 basis points), reductions of tax reserves related to the expiration of statutes of limitations (90 basis points), receipt of interest on refundable taxes (70 basis points) and an adjustment to reflect positions taken on previously filed tax returns (300 basis points). The effective tax rate for the first six months of fiscal 2011 included discrete tax benefits associated with the impact of benefits associated with foreign tax credits related to a decision to repatriate earnings previously fully reinvested (230 basis points), the December 2010 reinstatement of the U.S. research and development tax credit (80 basis points) and reductions of tax reserves associated with expiration of statutes of limitations (70 basis points). These discrete benefits were partially offset by unbenefitted losses in foreign tax jurisdictions (220 basis points) due to cumulative net operating losses.

 

Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates of $0.7 million in the first six months of fiscal 2012 and $0.2 million in the first six months of fiscal 2011 primarily represented the Company’s equity interest in a lease financing partnership, a commercial entity in Mexico and a joint venture in Europe.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Financial Condition at March   31, 2012

 

The Company’s capitalization was as follows (in millions):

 

 

 

March 31,

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

388.4

 

$

428.5

 

Total debt

 

987.8

 

1,060.1

 

Oshkosh Corporation’s shareholders’ equity

 

1,690.1

 

1,596.5

 

Total capitalization (debt plus equity)

 

2,677.9

 

2,656.6

 

Debt to total capitalization

 

36.9

%

39.9

%

 

36



Table of Contents

 

The Company repaid $72.5 million of debt during the first six months of fiscal 2012. During the first six months of fiscal 2012, the Company prepaid the final two scheduled principal payments for fiscal 2012 and the first two scheduled principal payments for fiscal 2013 under the Term Loan (as defined in “Liquidity”). The Company’s primary use of cash generated from operations continues to be debt reduction.

 

In addition to cash and cash equivalents, the Company had $517.3 million of unused available capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility (as defined in “Liquidity”) as of March 31, 2012. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility could, as discussed below, be limited by the financial covenants contained within the Credit Agreement (as defined in “Liquidity”).

 

Cash Flows

 

Operating Cash Flows

 

The Company generated $46.9 million of cash from operating activities during the first six months of fiscal 2012 compared to $256.6 million during the first six months of fiscal 2011. The decrease in cash generated by operating activities was primarily due to lower earnings during the first six months of fiscal 2012 and a reduction in amounts collected under undefinitized contracts with the U.S. government. Cash generation (use) from changes in significant working capital accounts was as follows (in millions):

 

 

 

Six Months Ended

 

 

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Receivables, net

 

$

(20.7

)

$

119.9

 

Inventories, net

 

(59.7

)

80.8

 

Accounts payable

 

(2.5

)

(46.6

)

Customer advances

 

(48.3

)

(123.2

)

 

 

$

(131.2

)

$

30.9

 

 

Cash utilized in the first six months of fiscal 2012 for inventory and receivables was generally a result of higher production and sales in the access equipment segment. Changes in inventory, receivables and accounts payable in the first six months of fiscal 2011 were generally a result of a substantial reduction in M-ATV vehicle and parts sales in the defense segment. The decrease in cash utilized for customer advances primarily related to the timing of performance-based payments in the defense segment.

 

The Company’s cash flow from operations has fluctuated, and will likely continue to fluctuate, significantly from quarter to quarter due to the start-up or conclusion of large defense contracts and the timing of receipt of individually large performance-based payments from the DoD, as well as changes in working capital requirements arising principally from seasonal fluctuations in sales.

 

Consolidated days sales outstanding (defined as “Trade Receivables” divided by “Net Sales” for the most recent quarter multiplied by 90 days) increased from 45 days at September 30, 2011 to 47 days at March 31, 2012. The slight increase in days sales outstanding was primarily due to a delay in the definitization of contracts in the defense segment. Days sales outstanding on non-defense sales was 54 days at March 31, 2012, down from 57 days at September 30, 2011. Consolidated inventory turns (defined as “Cost of Sales” divided by the average “Inventory” at the past five quarter end periods) increased from 5.5 times at September 30, 2011 to 5.8 times at March 31, 2012. The slight increase in inventory turns was primarily related to an increase in production rates.

 

37



Table of Contents

 

Investing Cash Flows

 

Cash flows relating to investing activities consist primarily of cash used for capital expenditures. Net cash used in investing activities in the first six months of fiscal 2012 was $19.4 million compared to $26.7 million in the first six months of fiscal 2011. Capital spending, excluding equipment held for rental, of $24.1 million in the first six months of fiscal 2012 reflected a decrease of $6.9 million compared to capital spending in the first six months of fiscal 2011. Fiscal 2011 capital expenditures included equipment for the FMTV contract production ramp-up. In fiscal 2012, the Company expects capital spending to approximate $75 million to $85 million.

 

Financing Cash Flows

 

Financing activities consist primarily of repayments of indebtedness. Financing activities resulted in a net use of cash of $69.8 million during the first six months of fiscal 2012 compared to $156.5 million during the first six months of fiscal 2011. In the first six months of fiscal 2012, the Company has used available cash and cash from operations generally for debt reduction.

 

Liquidity

 

The Company’s primary sources of liquidity are the cash flow generated from operations, availability under the $550.0 million Revolving Credit Facility (as defined below) and available cash and cash equivalents. In addition to cash and cash equivalents of $388.4 million, the Company had $517.3 million of unused availability under the Revolving Credit Facility as of March 31, 2012. These sources of liquidity are needed to fund the Company’s working capital requirements, debt service requirements and capital expenditures. The Company expects to have sufficient liquidity to finance its operations over the next twelve months.

 

Senior Secured Credit Agreement

 

The Company has a senior secured credit agreement with various lenders (the “Credit Agreement”). The Credit Agreement provides for (i) a revolving credit facility (“Revolving Credit Facility”) that matures in October 2015 with an initial maximum aggregate amount of availability of $550 million and (ii) a $650 million term loan (“Term Loan”) facility due in quarterly principal installments of $16.25 million with a balloon payment of $341.25 million due at maturity in October 2015. During the first six months of fiscal 2012, the Company prepaid the principal installments under the Term Loan that were originally due June 30, 2012 through March 31, 2013.

 

The Company’s obligations under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by certain of its domestic subsidiaries, and the Company will guarantee the obligations of certain of its subsidiaries under the Credit Agreement to the extent such subsidiaries borrow directly under the Credit Agreement. Subject to certain exceptions, the Credit Agreement is secured by (i) a first-priority perfected lien and security interests in substantially all of the personal property of the Company, each material subsidiary of the Company and each subsidiary guarantor, (ii) mortgages upon certain real property of the Company and certain of its domestic subsidiaries and (iii) a pledge of the equity of each material subsidiary and each subsidiary guarantor.

 

The Company must pay (i) an unused commitment fee ranging from 0.40% to 0.50% per annum of the average daily unused portion of the aggregate revolving credit commitments under the Credit Agreement and (ii) a fee ranging from 1.125% to 3.50% per annum of the maximum amount available to be drawn for each letter of credit issued and outstanding under the Credit Agreement.

 

Borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest at a variable rate equal to (i) LIBOR plus a specified margin, which may be adjusted upward or downward depending on whether certain criteria are satisfied, or (ii) for dollar-denominated loans only, the base rate (which is the highest of (a) the administrative agent’s prime rate, (b) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% or (c) the sum of 1% plus one-month LIBOR) plus a specified margin, which may be adjusted upward or downward depending on whether certain criteria are satisfied. At March 31, 2012, the interest spread on the Revolving Credit Facility and Term Loan was 275 basis points. The weighted-average interest rate on borrowings outstanding under the Term Loan at March 31, 2012 was 2.99%.

 

38



Table of Contents

 

Covenant Compliance

 

The Credit Agreement contains various restrictions and covenants, including requirements that the Company maintain certain financial ratios at prescribed levels and restrictions on the ability of the Company and certain of its subsidiaries to consolidate or merge, create liens, incur additional indebtedness, dispose of assets, consummate acquisitions and make investments in joint ventures and foreign subsidiaries. The Credit Agreement contains the following financial covenants:

 

·                   Leverage Ratio: A maximum leverage ratio (defined as, with certain adjustments, the ratio of the Company’s consolidated indebtedness to consolidated net income before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, non-cash charges and certain other items (“EBITDA”)) as of the last day of any fiscal quarter of 4.50 to 1.0.

·                   Interest Coverage Ratio: A minimum interest coverage ratio (defined as, with certain adjustments, the ratio of the Company’s EBITDA to the Company’s consolidated cash interest expense) as of the last day of any fiscal quarter of 2.50 to 1.0.

·                   Senior Secured Leverage Ratio: A maximum senior secured leverage ratio (defined as, with certain adjustments, the ratio of the Company’s consolidated secured indebtedness to the Company’s EBITDA) of the following:

 

Fiscal Quarter Ending

 

 

 

March 31, 2012 through September 30, 2012

 

3.00 to 1.0

 

Thereafter

 

2.75 to 1.0

 

 

The Company was in compliance with the financial covenants contained in the Credit Agreement as of March 31, 2012 and expects to be able to meet the financial covenants contained in the Credit Agreement over the next twelve months.

 

Additionally, with certain exceptions, the Credit Agreement limits the ability of the Company to pay dividends and other distributions, including repurchases of stock. However, so long as no event of default exists under the Credit Agreement or would result from such payment, the Company may pay dividends and other distributions in an aggregate amount not exceeding the sum of:

 

(i)              $50 million during any fiscal year; plus

(ii)           the excess of (a) 25% of the cumulative net income of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries for all fiscal quarters ending after September 27, 2010, over (b) the cumulative amount of all such dividends and other distributions made in any fiscal year ending after such date that exceed $50 million; plus

(iii)        for each of the first four fiscal quarters ending after September 27, 2010, $25 million per fiscal quarter, in each case provided that the leverage ratio (as defined) as of the last day of the most recently ended fiscal quarter was less than 2.0 to 1.0; plus

(iv)       for the period of four fiscal quarters ending September 30, 2011 and for each period of four fiscal quarters ending thereafter, $100 million during such period, in each case provided that the leverage ratio (as defined) as of the last day of the most recently ended fiscal quarter was less than 2.0 to 1.0.

 

Senior Notes

 

In March 2010, the Company issued $250.0 million of 8¼% unsecured senior notes due March 1, 2017 and $250.0 million of 8½% unsecured senior notes due March 1, 2020 (collectively, the “Senior Notes”). The Senior Notes were issued pursuant to an indenture (the “Indenture”) among the Company, the subsidiary guarantors named therein and a trustee. The Indenture contains customary affirmative and negative covenants. The Company has the option to redeem the Senior Notes due 2017 and Senior Notes due 2020 for a premium after March 1, 2014 and March 1, 2015, respectively. Certain of the Company’s subsidiaries fully, unconditionally, jointly and severally guarantee the Company’s obligations under the Senior Notes. See Note 20 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for separate financial information of the subsidiary guarantors.

 

Refer to Note 8 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the Company’s outstanding debt as of March 31, 2012.

 

Contractual Obligations, Commercial Commitments and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

The Company’s contractual obligations, commercial commitments and off-balance sheet arrangement disclosures in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2011 have not materially changed since that report was filed.

 

39



Table of Contents

 

Application of Critical Accounting Policies

 

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires the Company to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes. The significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are described in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011. The Company’s application of critical accounting policies has not materially changed since that report was filed.

 

Critical Accounting Estimates

 

The Company’s disclosures of critical accounting estimates in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2011 have not materially changed since that report was filed.

 

New Accounting Standards

 

Refer to Note 2 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the impact on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of new accounting standards.

 

Customers and Backlog

 

Sales to the U.S. government comprised approximately 46% of the Company’s net sales in the first six months of fiscal 2012. No other single customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s net sales for this period. A substantial majority of the Company’s net sales are derived from customer orders received prior to commencing production.

 

During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, the U.S. government awarded the Company a two-year extension on its FHTV contract. Under the extended contract, the U.S. government can place orders through October 2013 and deliveries can continue through September 2014. As part of the extended contract, the Company retained the design rights to the Company’s vehicles.

 

The Company’s backlog as of March 31, 2012 decreased 9.5% to $5.58 billion compared to $6.16 billion at March 31, 2011. Access equipment segment backlog increased 57.9% to $941.5 million at March 31, 2012 compared to $596.3 million at March 31, 2011 largely due to increased orders in North America. Access equipment segment backlog at March 31, 2012 and 2011 included $81.3 million and $55.2 million, respectively, relating to telehandler orders from the DoD. Defense segment backlog decreased 21.2% to $3.93 billion at March 31, 2012 compared to $4.99 billion at March 31, 2011 due largely to the fulfillment of FHTV orders and the delay in finalizing the fiscal 2012 U.S. federal budget. Fire & emergency segment backlog increased 23.1% to $565.8 million at March 31, 2012 compared to $459.8 million at March 31, 2011 due largely to additional logistical requirements associated with international sales, which increase the amount of time between the completion of vehicle production and the ability of the Company to recognize related revenue. Commercial segment backlog increased 15.3% to $137.3 million at March 31, 2012 compared to $119.1 million at March 31, 2011. Unit backlog for concrete mixers was up 31.6% compared to March 31, 2011, primarily as a result of increased international orders. Unit backlog for refuse collection vehicles was down 2.3% compared to March 31, 2011.

 

Reported backlog excludes purchase options and announced orders for which definitive contracts have not been executed. Additionally, backlog excludes unfunded portions of the FHTV and FMTV contracts. Backlog information and comparisons thereof as of different dates may not be accurate indicators of future sales or the ratio of the Company’s future sales to the DoD versus its sales to other customers. Approximately 41% of the Company’s March 31, 2012 backlog is not expected to be filled in fiscal 2012.

 

ITEM 3.          QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

The Company’s quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk for changes in interest rates, commodity and foreign currency exchange risk, which are incorporated by reference to Item 7A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2011, have not materially changed since that report was filed.

 

40



Table of Contents

 

ITEM 4.          CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures . In accordance with Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), the Company’s management evaluated, with the participation of the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the quarter ended March 31, 2012. Based upon their evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures, the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the quarter ended March 31, 2012 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time period specified in the SEC rules and forms, and to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

Changes in internal control. There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

41



Table of Contents

 

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1.          LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

On January 8, 2010, Control Solutions LLC (“Control Solutions”) brought suit against the Company in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois for breach of express contract, breach of implied-in-fact contract, unjust enrichment and promissory estoppel related to the Company’s contract to supply the United States Department of Defense with M-ATVs. Control Solutions has asserted damages in the amount of $190.3 million. On October 3, 2011, following written and oral discovery, the Company moved for summary judgment. On that same date, Control Solutions filed a cross-motion for summary judgment. The Company’s and Control Solutions’ response briefs have been filed with the Court. While this case is in the early stages of litigation and its outcome cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company believes that the ultimate resolution of this case will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Actual results could vary, among other things, due to the uncertainties involved in litigation.

 

ITEM 1A.       RISK FACTORS

 

The Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows are subject to various risks, many of which are not exclusively within the Company’s control that may cause actual performance to differ materially from historical or projected future performance. In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the risk factors discussed in Item 1A. of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2011, which have not materially changed other than as reflected below.

 

Certain of our markets are highly cyclical and the current or any further decline in these markets could have a material adverse effect on our operating performance.

 

The high levels of sales in our defense business in recent years have been due in significant part to demand for defense trucks, replacement parts and services (including armoring) and truck remanufacturing arising from the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. Events such as these are unplanned, as is the demand for our products that arises out of such events. In addition, current economic conditions have put significant pressure on the U.S. federal budget, including the defense budget. Approximately 94% of our defense segment sales in fiscal 2011 were to the DoD. The DoD budget for fiscal 2012 includes significantly lower funding for purchases of new military vehicles that we manufacture under our FHTV and FMTV contracts than in prior years. In addition, the President’s fiscal 2013 defense budget request, which includes expected funding requests for defense programs through fiscal 2017, includes lower anticipated funding levels for the FHTV and FMTV programs than those that were included in the fiscal 2012 budget and includes no planned funding for the FMTV program starting in fiscal 2015. The President’s fiscal 2013 budget request reflects previously announced plans to cut U.S. defense spending by $487 billion over the next ten years. The Budget Control Act of 2011 contains an automatic sequestration feature that could require cuts to defense spending totaling over $1 trillion during this period if Congress fails to enact the specified $1.2 trillion in U.S. federal deficit reductions. Unless Congress acts, sequestration will result in significant reductions to the defense budget starting in calendar 2013. Moreover, virtually all U.S. troops were withdrawn from Iraq during 2011, and plans exist regarding the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan by December 2014, both of which will likely result in a reduction in the level of defense funding allocated to support U.S. military involvement in those conflicts. The magnitude of the adverse impact that federal budget pressures, expected reductions in future defense funding as a result of the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq and planned withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan and an uncertain DoD tactical wheeled vehicle strategy will have on funding for Oshkosh defense programs is uncertain, but directionally, we expect such funding to decline significantly. Furthermore, our defense business may fluctuate significantly from time to time as a result of the start and completion of new contract awards that we may receive.

 

The decline, compared to historical levels, in overall customer demand in our commercial and fire & emergency markets that we have experienced since the start of the global economic downturn and any further decline could have a material adverse effect on our operating performance. While demand in our access equipment markets has rebounded from historical lows that we experienced during the Great Recession, such demand is dependent on the global economies and may not be sustainable. The access equipment market is highly cyclical and impacted by the strength of economies in general, by prevailing mortgage and other interest rates, by residential and non-residential construction spending, by the ability of rental companies to obtain third party financing to purchase revenue generating assets, by capital expenditures of rental companies in general and by other factors. The ready-mix concrete market that we serve is highly cyclical and impacted by the strength of the economy generally, by prevailing mortgage and other interest rates, by the number of housing starts and by other factors that may have an effect on the level of concrete placement activity, either regionally or nationally. Refuse collection vehicle markets are also cyclical and impacted by the strength of economies

 

42



Table of Contents

 

in general, by municipal tax receipts and by capital expenditures of large waste haulers. Fire & emergency markets are cyclical later in an economic downturn and are impacted by the economy generally and by municipal tax receipts and capital expenditures. Concrete mixer and access equipment sales also are seasonal with the majority of such sales occurring in the spring and summer months, which constitute the traditional construction season in the Northern hemisphere.

 

The global economy continues to experience weakness, which has negatively impacted sales volumes for our access equipment, commercial and fire & emergency products as compared to historical levels. In addition, the global economic weakness has caused lending institutions to tighten their credit lending standards, which has restricted our customers’ access to capital. Continued weakness in U.S. and European housing starts and non-residential construction spending in most geographical areas of the world are further contributing to the lower sales volumes. A lack of significant improvement in residential and non-residential construction spending or continued low levels of construction activity generally may cause future weakness in demand for our products. Municipal tax revenues in the U.S. have weakened, which has negatively impacted demand for fire apparatus and refuse collection vehicles and delayed the recovery in these markets. Furthermore, it is possible that emerging market growth could slow, which could negatively impact our growth in those markets. We cannot provide any assurance that the global economic weakness and tight credit markets will not continue or become more severe. In addition, we cannot provide any assurance that any economic recovery will not progress more slowly than what we or the market expect. If the global economic weakness and tight credit markets continue or become more severe, or if any economic recovery progresses more slowly than what we or the market expect, then there could be a material adverse effect on our net sales, financial condition, profitability and/or cash flows.

 

We expect to incur costs and charges as a result of measures such as facilities and operations consolidations and workforce reductions that we expect will reduce costs, and those measures also may be disruptive to our business and may not result in anticipated cost savings.

 

We have been consolidating facilities and operations in an effort to make our business more efficient and expect to continue to review our overall manufacturing footprint. For example, during the second quarter of fiscal 2012, we continued to address issues associated with earlier facility consolidations at our Bradenton, Florida operations, and we closed our commercial segment facility in McIntire, Iowa and consolidated production from that facility into other commercial segment facilities. We also exited the United States mobile medical trailer product line and announced further workforce reductions in the fire & emergency segment during the second quarter of fiscal 2012. We have incurred, and expect in the future to incur, additional costs and restructuring charges in connection with such consolidations, workforce reductions and other cost reduction measures that have adversely affected and, to the extent incurred in the future would adversely affect, our future earnings and cash flows. Furthermore, such actions may be disruptive to our business, as we are experiencing with the facility consolidations into our Bradenton, Florida operations. This may result in production inefficiencies, product quality issues, late product deliveries or lost orders as we begin production at consolidated facilities, which would adversely impact our sales levels, operating results and operating margins. In addition, we may not realize the cost savings that we expect to realize as a result of such actions.

 

Our business could be negatively affected as a result of actions of activist shareholders.

 

Certain funds affiliated with Carl Icahn conducted a proxy contest with respect to the election of directors at our 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Responding to proxy contests such as this and other actions by activist shareholders can be costly and time-consuming, disrupt our operations and divert the attention of management and our employees.  Perceived uncertainties among current and potential customers, employees and other parties as to our future direction may result in the loss of potential business opportunities and may make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified personnel and business partners.  Furthermore, if there is disagreement among our directors about the direction of our business, it could impair our ability to effectively and timely implement our MOVE strategy.  These actions could also cause our stock price to experience periods of volatility.

 

43



Table of Contents

 

ITEM 2.          UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

 

In July 1995, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 6,000,000 shares of Common Stock. The Company did not repurchase any shares under this authorization during the quarter ended March 31, 2012. As of March 31, 2012, the Company had repurchased 2,769,210 shares under this program at a cost of $6.6 million, leaving the Company with authority to repurchase 3,230,790 shares of Common Stock under this program. The Company can use this authorization at any time, and there is no expiration date associated with the Board authorization. The Company’s credit agreement restricts the Company’s ability to repurchase shares of its Common Stock through financial covenants. The Company’s credit agreement also limits the amount of dividends and other distributions, including repurchases of stock, it may pay to $50 million during any fiscal year; plus the excess of (a) 25% of the cumulative net income of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries for all fiscal quarters ending after September 27, 2010, over (b) the cumulative amount of all such dividends and other distributions made in any fiscal year ending after such date that exceed $50 million, plus (c) for each of the first four fiscal quarters ending after September 27, 2010, $25 million per fiscal quarter, in each case provided that the leverage ratio (as defined) as of the last day of the most recently ended fiscal quarter was less than 2.0 to 1.0; plus (d) for the period of four fiscal quarters ending September 30, 2011 and for each period of four fiscal quarters ending thereafter, $100 million during such period, in each case provided that the leverage ratio (as defined) as of the last day of the most recently ended fiscal quarter was less than 2.0 to 1.0. The Company’s indenture also contains restrictive covenants that may limit the Company’s ability to repurchase shares of its Common Stock or make dividends and other types of distributions to shareholders.

 

ITEM 6.          EXHIBITS

 

Exhibit No.

 

Description

 

 

 

10.1

 

Oshkosh Corporation 2009 Incentive Stock and Awards Plan as Amended and Restated, as amended January 18, 2012.*

 

 

 

31.1

 

Certification by the President and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, dated April 26, 2012.

 

 

 

31.2

 

Certification by the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, dated April 26, 2012.

 

 

 

32.1

 

Written Statement of the President and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, dated April 26, 2012.

 

 

 

32.2

 

Written Statement of the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, dated April 26, 2012.

 

 

 

101

 

The following materials from Oshkosh Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 are furnished herewith, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 


*      Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

 

44



Table of Contents

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

 

 

 

 

April 26, 2012

/S/ Charles L. Szews

 

Charles L. Szews

 

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

 

 

April 26, 2012

/S/ David M. Sagehorn

 

David M. Sagehorn

 

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

(Principal Financial Officer)

 

 

 

 

April 26, 2012

/S/ Thomas J. Polnaszek

 

Thomas J. Polnaszek

 

Senior Vice President Finance and Controller

 

(Principal Accounting Officer)

 

45



Table of Contents

 

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit No.

 

Description

 

 

 

10.1

 

Oshkosh Corporation 2009 Incentive Stock and Awards Plan as Amended and Restated, as amended January 18, 2012.*

 

 

 

31.1

 

Certification by the President and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, dated April 26, 2012.

 

 

 

31.2

 

Certification by the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, dated April 26, 2012.

 

 

 

32.1

 

Written Statement of the President and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, dated April 26, 2012.

 

 

 

32.2

 

Written Statement of the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, dated April 26, 2012.

 

 

 

101

 

The following materials from Oshkosh Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 are furnished herewith, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 


*      Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

 

46


Exhibit 10.1

 

As amended January 18, 2012

 

OSHKOSH CORPORATION

 

2009 INCENTIVE STOCK AND AWARDS PLAN
As Amended and Restated

 

1.             Purposes, History and Effective Date.

 

(a)           Purpose . The Oshkosh Corporation 2009 Incentive Stock and Awards Plan has two complementary purposes: (i) to attract and retain outstanding individuals to serve as officers, directors, employees and consultants and (ii) to increase shareholder value. This Plan will provide participants incentives to increase shareholder value by offering the opportunity to acquire shares of the Company’s common stock, receive monetary payments based on the value of such common stock, or receive other incentive compensation, on the potentially favorable terms that this Plan provides.

 

(b)           History . Prior to the effective date of this Plan, the Company had in effect the 1990 Plan, which was originally effective April 9, 1990, and the 2004 Plan, which was originally effective February 3, 2004. The 1990 Plan terminated upon shareholder approval of the 2004 Plan on February 3, 2004, and no new awards have been granted under the 1990 Plan since such date. Upon shareholder approval of this Plan on February 3, 2009, the 2004 Plan terminated, and after such date no new awards have been granted under the 2004 Plan, although awards granted under the 2004 Plan or the 1990 Plan and still outstanding continue to be subject to all terms and conditions of the 2004 Plan or the 1990 Plan, as applicable, subject to Section 14(c) of this Plan.  The Board amended and restated this Plan effective November 15, 2011, contingent on subsequent shareholder approval of this Plan as amended and restated.

 

(c)           Effective Date . This Plan became effective on, and Awards may be granted under this Plan on and after, the Effective Date. This Plan will terminate as provided in Section 14.

 

2.             Definitions. Capitalized terms used in this Plan have the following meanings:

 

(a)           “1990 Plan” means the Oshkosh Corporation 1990 Incentive Stock Plan, as amended.

 

(b)           “2004 Plan” means the Oshkosh Corporation 2004 Incentive Stock and Awards Plan, as amended.

 

(c)           “Affiliate” has the meaning ascribed to such term in Rule 12b-2 promulgated under the Exchange Act or any successor rule or regulation thereto.

 

(d)           “Amendment Approval Date” means the date on which the Company’s shareholders approve this Plan as amended and restated.

 

(e)           “Award” means a grant of Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Performance Shares, Performance Units, Shares, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units or an Incentive Award. Any Award granted under this Plan shall be provided or made in such manner and at such time as complies with the applicable requirements of Code Section 409A to avoid a plan failure described in Code Section 409A(a)(1), including, without limitation, deferring payment to a specified employee or until a specified distribution event, as provided in Code Section 409A(a)(2).

 

(f)            “Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.

 

(g)           “Cause” means, except as otherwise determined by the Committee upon the grant of an Award, (i) conviction of a felony or a plea of no contest to a felony, (ii) willful misconduct that is materially and demonstrably detrimental to the Company or an Affiliate, (iii) willful refusal to perform requested

 



 

duties consistent with a Participant’s office, position or status with the Company or an Affiliate (other than as a result of physical or mental disability) or (iv) other conduct or inaction that the Committee determines in its discretion constitutes Cause, except that, with respect to clauses (ii), (iii) and (iv), Cause shall be determined by a majority of the Committee at a meeting held after reasonable notice to the Participant and including an opportunity for the Participant and his or her counsel to be heard, and the Committee shall not have the right to determine that Cause exists pursuant to clause (iv) following the occurrence of a Change in Control. All determinations of the Committee as to Cause shall be final.

 

(h)           “Change in Control” means the occurrence of any one of the following events:

 

(i) any Person (other than (A) the Company or any of its subsidiaries, (B) a trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under any employee benefit plan of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, (C) an underwriter temporarily holding securities pursuant to an offering of such securities, or (D) a corporation owned, directly or indirectly, by the shareholders of the Company in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of stock in the Company (individually, an “Excluded Person” and collectively, “Excluded Persons”)) is or becomes the “Beneficial Owner” (as such term is defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company (not including in the securities beneficially owned by such Person any securities acquired directly from the Company or its Affiliates after the Effective Date, pursuant to express authorization by the Board that refers to this exception) representing 25% or more of (1) the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding voting securities or (2) the then outstanding shares of common stock of the Company; or

 

(ii) the following individuals cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the number of Directors then serving:  individuals who, on the Effective Date, constituted the Board and any new Director (other than a Director whose initial assumption of office is in connection with an actual or threatened election contest, including but not limited to a consent solicitation, relating to the election of directors of the Company) whose appointment or election by the Board or nomination for election by the Company’s shareholders was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the Directors then still in office who either were Directors on the Effective Date or whose appointment, election or nomination for election was previously so approved; or

 

(iii) consummation of a merger, consolidation or share exchange of the Company with any other corporation or issuance of voting securities of the Company in connection with a merger, consolidation or share exchange of the Company (or any direct or indirect subsidiary of the Company), other than (A) a merger, consolidation or share exchange that would result in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior to such merger, consolidation or share exchange continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity or any parent thereof) at least 50% of the combined voting power of the voting securities of the Company or such surviving entity or any parent thereof outstanding immediately after such merger, consolidation or share exchange, or (B) a merger, consolidation or share exchange effected to implement a recapitalization of the Company (or similar transaction) in which no Person (other than an Excluded Person) is or becomes the Beneficial Owner, directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company (not including in the securities beneficially owned by such Person any securities acquired directly from the Company or its Affiliates after the Effective Date, pursuant to express authorization by the Board that refers to this exception) representing 25% or more of (1) the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding voting securities or (2) the then outstanding shares of common stock of the Company; or

 

(iv) (A) the shareholders of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company or (B) the consummation of the sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets (in one transaction or a series of related transactions within any period of twenty-four (24) consecutive months), other than a sale or

 

A-2



 

disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets to an entity at least 75% of the combined voting power of the voting securities of which are owned by Persons in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of the Company immediately prior to such sale.

 

Notwithstanding the foregoing, no “Change in Control” shall be deemed to have occurred if there is consummated any transaction or series of integrated transactions immediately following which the record holders of the common stock of the Company immediately prior to such transaction or series of transactions continue to have substantially the same proportionate ownership in an entity that owns all or substantially all of the assets of the Company immediately following such transaction or series of transactions.

 

(i)            “Change in Control Price” means the highest of the following: (i) the Fair Market Value of a Share, as determined on the date of the Change in Control; (ii) the highest price per Share paid in the Change in Control transaction; or (iii) the Fair Market Value of a Share, calculated on the date of surrender of the relevant Award in accordance with Section 16(c), but this clause (iii) shall not apply if in the Change in Control transaction, or pursuant to an agreement to which the Company is a party governing the Change in Control transaction, all of the Shares are purchased for and/or converted into the right to receive a current payment of cash and no other securities or other property.

 

(j)            “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Any reference to a specific provision of the Code includes any successor provision and the regulations promulgated under such provision.

 

(k)           “Committee” means the Human Resources Committee of the Board (or a successor committee with the same or similar authority).

 

(l)            “Company” means Oshkosh Corporation, a Wisconsin corporation, or any successor thereto.

 

(m)          “Director” means a member of the Board, and “Non-Employee Director” means a Director who is not also an employee of the Company or its Subsidiaries.

 

(n)           “Disability” has the meaning ascribed to the terms “total disability” or “totally disabled” in the Oshkosh Corporation Long Term Disability Program for Salaried Employees (or any successor plan thereto).

 

(o)           “Effective Date” means February 3, 2009.

 

(p)           “Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Any reference to a specific provision of the Exchange Act includes any successor provision and the regulations and rules promulgated under such provision.

 

(q)           “Fair Market Value” means, per Share on a particular date, the last sales price on such date on the national securities exchange on which the Stock is then traded, as reported in The Wall Street Journal, or if no sales of Stock occur on the date in question, on the last preceding date on which there was a sale on such exchange. If the Shares are not listed on a national securities exchange, but are traded in an over-the-counter market, the last sales price (or, if there is no last sales price reported, the average of the closing bid and asked prices) for the Shares on the particular date, or on the last preceding date on which there was a sale of Shares on that market, will be used. If the Shares are neither listed on a national securities exchange nor traded in an over-the-counter market, the price determined by the Committee, in its discretion, will be used.

 

A-3



 

(r)            “Incentive Award” means the right to receive a payment to the extent Performance Goals are achieved or other conditions are satisfied, and shall include “Annual Incentive Awards” as described in Section 10 and “Long-Term Incentive Awards” as described in Section 11.

 

(s)            “Option” means the right to purchase Shares at a stated price for a specified period of time.

 

(t)            “Participant” means an individual selected by the Committee to receive an Award.

 

(u)           “Performance Goals” means any goals the Committee establishes that relate to one or more of the following with respect to the Company or any one or more Subsidiaries, Affiliates or other business units:  sales or other revenues; cost of sales; expenses; cost reductions; income or earnings, including net income, operating income, earnings per share or margins; cash flow; debt; ratio of debt to equity or other financial measure that appears on the Company’s financial statements or is derived from one or more amounts that appear on the Company’s financial statements; return on shareholders equity, capital, assets or other financial measure that appears on the Company’s financial statements or is derived from one or more amounts that appear on the Company’s financial statements; working capital or any of its components, including accounts receivable, inventories or accounts payable; assets; stock price; dividend payments; economic value added; market share; new product releases; and product quality. As to each Performance Goal, the relevant measurement of performance shall be computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles to the extent applicable, but, unless otherwise determined by the Committee and to the extent consistent with Code Section 162(m), will exclude the effects of (i) charges for reorganizing and restructuring, (ii) discontinued operations, (iii) asset write-downs, (iv) gains or losses on the disposition of a business or business segment, (v) changes in tax or accounting principles, regulations or laws, (vi) extraordinary, unusual and/or non-recurring items of gain or loss, and (vii) mergers, acquisitions or dispositions, that in each case the Company identifies in its audited financial statements, including footnotes, or the Management’s Discussion and Analysis section of the Company’s annual report.  Also, for Awards intended to be considered “performance-based compensation” under Code Section 162(m), the Committee may, to the extent consistent with Code Section 162(m), appropriately adjust any evaluation of performance under a Performance Goal to exclude any of the following events that occurs during a performance period: (i) litigation, claims, judgments or settlements; (ii) the effects of changes in other laws or regulations affecting reported results; and (iii) accruals of any amounts for payment under this Plan or any other compensation arrangements maintained by the Company.  In addition, in the case of Awards that the Committee determines will not be considered “performance-based compensation” under Code Section 162(m), the Committee may establish other Performance Goals not listed in this Plan or adjust any evaluation of performance under a Performance Goal to the extent the Committee deems appropriate and consistent with the terms of this Plan.

 

(v)           “Performance Shares” means the right to receive Shares to the extent Performance Goals are achieved.

 

(w)          “Performance Units” means the right to receive cash and/or Shares valued in relation to a unit that has a designated dollar value or the value of which is equal to the Fair Market Value of one or more Shares, to the extent Performance Goals are achieved.

 

(x)           “Person” has the meaning given in Section 3(a)(9) of the Exchange Act, as modified and used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) thereof, or any group of Persons acting in concert that would be considered “persons acting as a group” within the meaning of Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-3(i)(5).

 

(y)           “Plan” means this Oshkosh Corporation 2009 Incentive Stock and Awards Plan, as may be amended from time to time.

 

A-4



 

(z)           “Restricted Stock” means Shares that are subject to a risk of forfeiture and/or restrictions on transfer, which may lapse upon the achievement or partial achievement of Performance Goals and/or upon the completion of a period of service.

 

(aa)         “Restricted Stock Unit” means the right to receive cash and/or Shares the value of which is equal to the Fair Market Value of one Share.

 

(bb)         “Retirement” means a Participant’s termination of employment or service as a Director at a time that the Participant is at least age 55 and has completed at least five (5) years of continuous service with the Company.

 

(cc)         “Rule 16b-3” means Rule 16b-3 as promulgated by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission under the Exchange Act.

 

(dd)         “Section 16 Participants” means Participants who are subject to the provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act.

 

(ee)         “Share” means a share of Stock.

 

(ff)          “Stock” means the Common Stock of the Company, par value of one cent ($.01) per share.

 

(gg)         “Stock Appreciation Right” or “SAR” means the right of a Participant to receive cash equal to the appreciation of the Fair Market Value of a Share during a specified period of time.

 

(hh)         “Subsidiary” means any corporation, limited liability company or other limited liability entity in an unbroken chain of entities beginning with the Company if each of the entities (other than the last entities in the chain) owns the stock or equity interest possessing more than fifty percent (50%) of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock or other equity interests in one of the other entities in the chain.

 

3.             Administration.

 

(a)           Committee Administration . In addition to the authority specifically granted to the Committee in this Plan, the Committee has full discretionary authority to administer this Plan, including but not limited to the authority to (i) interpret the provisions of this Plan, (ii) prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to this Plan, (iii) correct any defect, supply any omission, or reconcile any inconsistency in any Award or agreement covering an Award in the manner and to the extent it deems desirable to carry this Plan into effect and (iv) make all other determinations necessary or advisable for the administration of this Plan. A majority of the members of the Committee will constitute a quorum, and a majority of the Committee’s members must make all determinations of the Committee. The Committee may make any determination under this Plan without notice or meeting of the Committee by a writing that a majority of the Committee members have signed. All Committee determinations are final and binding.

 

(b)           Delegation to Other Committees or Officers . To the extent applicable law permits, the Board may delegate to another committee of the Board or to one or more officers of the Company any or all of the authority and responsibility of the Committee. However, no such delegation is permitted with respect to Awards made to Section 16 Participants at the time any such delegated authority or responsibility is exercised. The Board also may delegate to another committee of the Board consisting entirely of Non-Employee Directors any or all of the authority and responsibility of the Committee with respect to individuals who are Section 16 Participants. If the Board has made such a delegation, then all references to the Committee in this Plan include such other committee or one or more officers to the extent of such delegation.

 

A-5



 

(c)           Indemnification . The Company will indemnify and hold harmless each member of the Board and the Committee, and each officer or member of any other committee to whom a delegation under Section 3(b) has been made, as to any act or omission, or determination made, with respect to this Plan or any Award to the maximum extent that the law and the Company’s by-laws permit.

 

4.             Eligibility. The Committee may designate any of the following as a Participant from time to time: any officer or other employee of the Company or its Affiliates, an individual that the Company or an Affiliate has engaged to become an officer or employee, a consultant who provides services to the Company or its Affiliates, or a Director, including a Non-Employee Director. The Committee’s designation of a Participant in any year will not require the Committee to designate such person to receive an Award in any other year.  The Committee’s granting of a particular type of Award to a Participant will not require the Committee to grant the same or any other type of Award to such individual.

 

5.             Types of Awards. Subject to the terms of this Plan, the Committee may grant any type of Award to any Participant it selects, but only employees of the Company or a Subsidiary (that qualifies under Section 422 of the Code) may receive grants of incentive stock options within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code. Awards may be granted alone or in addition to, in tandem with, or (subject to the prohibition on repricing contained in Section 14(e)) in substitution for any other Award (or any other award granted under another plan of the Company or any Affiliate).

 

6.             Shares Reserved under this Plan.

 

(a)           Plan Reserve . Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 16, as of the Amendment Approval Date, an aggregate of 6,000,000 Shares, plus the number of Shares issuable under Awards outstanding under this Plan as of the Amendment Approval Date, plus the number of Shares available for issuance under this Plan that have not been made subject to an outstanding Award as of the Amendment Approval Date, plus the number of Shares described in Section 6(c), are reserved for issuance under this Plan. The aggregate number of Shares reserved under this Section 6(a) shall be depleted by the maximum number of Shares, if any, that may be payable under an Award as determined at the time of grant; provided that the aggregate number of Shares reserved under this Section 6(a) shall be depleted by 1.75 Shares for each Share delivered in payment or settlement of a full-value Award. For this purpose, a full-value award includes Shares, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units payable in Shares, Performance Shares, Performance Units payable in Shares and any other similar Award payable in Shares under which the value of the Award is measured as the full value of a Share, rather than the increase in the value of a Share. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company may issue only such number of Shares as is described in the first sentence of this Section 6(a) upon the exercise of incentive stock options. For purposes of determining the aggregate number of Shares reserved for issuance under this Plan, any fractional Share shall be rounded to the next highest full Share.

 

(b)           Replenishment of Shares Under this Plan . If (i) an Award lapses, expires, terminates or is cancelled without the issuance of Shares under the Award (whether due currently or on a deferred basis), (ii) the Committee determines during or at the conclusion of the term of an Award that all or some portion of the Shares with respect to which the Award was granted will not be issued on the basis that the conditions for such issuance will not be satisfied, (iii) Shares are forfeited under an Award or (iv) Shares are issued under any Award and the Company subsequently reacquires them pursuant to rights reserved upon the issuance of the Shares, then such Shares shall be recredited to this Plan’s reserve (in the same number as they depleted the reserve) and may again be used for new Awards under this Plan, but such Shares may not be issued pursuant to incentive stock options. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in no event shall the following Shares be recredited to this Plan’s reserve: Shares tendered or withheld in payment of the exercise price of an outstanding Option; Shares tendered or withheld to satisfy federal, state or local tax withholding obligations; and Shares purchased by the Company using proceeds from Option exercises.

 

A-6



 

(c)           Addition of Shares from Predecessor Plans . After the Amendment Approval Date, if any Shares subject to awards granted under the 1990 Plan or the 2004 Plan would again become available for new grants under the terms of such plan if such plan were still in effect, then those Shares will be available for the purpose of granting Awards under this Plan, thereby increasing the number of Shares available for issuance under this Plan as determined under the first sentence of Section 6(a). Any such Shares will not be available for future awards under the terms of the 1990 Plan or the 2004 Plan.

 

(d)           Participant Limitations . Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 16, no Participant may be granted Awards that could result in such Participant:

 

(i) receiving Options for, and/or Stock Appreciation Rights with respect to, more than 5,000,000 Shares during any period of five consecutive fiscal years of the Company;

 

(ii) receiving Awards of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units relating to more than 1,500,000 Shares during any period of five consecutive fiscal years of the Company;

 

(iii) receiving, with respect to an Award of Performance Shares and/or an Award of Performance Units the value of which is based on the Fair Market Value of a Share, payment of more than 600,000 Shares in respect of any period of two consecutive fiscal years of the Company, or of more than 900,000 Shares in respect of any period of three consecutive fiscal years of the Company;

 

(iv) receiving, with respect to an Annual Incentive Award in respect of any single fiscal year of the Company, a cash payment of more than $6,000,000; or

 

(v) receiving, with respect to a Long-Term Incentive Award and/or an Award of Performance Units the value of which is not based on the Fair Market Value of a Share, a cash payment of more than $12,000,000 in respect of any period of two consecutive fiscal years of the Company, or of more than $18,000,000 in respect of any period of three consecutive fiscal years of the Company.

 

In all cases, determinations under this Section 6(d) should be made in a manner that is consistent with the exemption for performance-based compensation that Code Section 162(m) provides.

 

7.             Options. Subject to the terms of this Plan, the Committee will determine all terms and conditions of each Option, including but not limited to: (a) whether the Option is an “incentive stock option” which meets the requirements of Code Section 422, or a “nonqualified stock option” which does not meet the requirements of Code Section 422; (b) the grant date, which may not be any day prior to the date that the Committee approves the grant; (c) the number of Shares subject to the Option; (d) the exercise price, which may never be less than the Fair Market Value of the Shares subject to the Option as determined on the date of grant; (e) the terms and conditions of exercise; and (f) the term, except that an Option must terminate no later than seven (7) years after the date of grant. In all other respects, the terms of any incentive stock option should comply with the provisions of Code Section 422 except to the extent the Committee determines otherwise. If an Option that is intended to be an incentive stock option fails to meet the requirements of Code Section 422, the Option shall automatically be treated as a nonqualified stock option to the extent of such failure.  Except to the extent the Committee determines otherwise, a Participant may exercise an Option in whole or part after the right to exercise the Option has accrued, provided that any partial exercise must be for one hundred (100) Shares or multiples thereof. Except as the Committee may otherwise provide, an Option shall expire at the earliest of seven (7) years from the date of grant, three (3) months after termination of the Participant’s employment or service for reasons other than death, Disability, Retirement or Cause, one (1) year after termination of the Participant’s employment or service as a result of death or Disability, three (3) years after termination of the Participant’s employment or service as a result of Retirement, or immediately upon termination of the Participant’s employment or service for Cause.

 

A-7



 

8.             Stock Appreciation Rights. Subject to the terms of this Plan, the Committee will determine all terms and conditions of each SAR, including but not limited to: (a) whether the SAR is granted independently of an Option or relates to an Option; (b) the grant date, which may not be any day prior to the date that the Committee approves the grant; (c) the number of Shares to which the SAR relates; (d) the grant price, which may never be less than the Fair Market Value of the Shares subject to the SAR as determined on the date of grant; (e) the terms and conditions of exercise or maturity; and (f) the term, provided that an SAR must terminate no later than seven (7) years after the date of grant. If an SAR is granted in relation to an Option, then unless otherwise determined by the Committee, the SAR shall be exercisable or shall mature at the same time or times, on the same conditions and to the extent and in the proportion, that the related Option is exercisable and may be exercised or mature for all or part of the Shares subject to the related Option. Upon exercise of any number of SAR, the number of Shares subject to the related Option shall be reduced accordingly and such Option may not be exercised with respect to that number of Shares. The exercise of any number of Options that relate to an SAR shall likewise result in an equivalent reduction in the number of Shares covered by the related SAR.

 

9.             Performance and Stock Awards. Subject to the terms of this Plan, the Committee will determine all terms and conditions of each award of Shares, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Shares or Performance Units, including, but not limited to: (a) the number of Shares and/or units to which such Award relates; (b) whether, as a condition for the Participant to realize all or a portion of the benefit provided under the Award, one or more Performance Goals must be achieved during such period as the Committee specifies; (c) the length of the vesting and/or performance period and, if different, the date on which payment of the benefit provided under the Award will be made; (d) with respect to Performance Units, whether to measure the value of each unit in relation to a designated dollar value or the Fair Market Value of one or more Shares; and (e) with respect to Performance Units and Restricted Stock Units, whether to settle such Awards in cash, in Shares, or in a combination of cash and Shares. Notwithstanding the foregoing, subject to the provisions of Sections 14 and 16, on or after the Amendment Approval Date, (x) no condition or vesting provision applicable to an Award of Shares, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Shares or Performance Units that is based on performance criteria shall be based on performance over a period of less than one (1) year, and no condition or vesting provision applicable to such an Award that is based upon continued service or the passage of time shall provide for vesting in less than pro rata installments over three (3) years from the date the Award is made, other than with respect to such Awards that are issued upon exercise or settlement of Options or SARs; and (y) no more than 300,000 Shares not subject to conditions or vesting provisions, or subject to conditions or vesting provisions that do not meet the minimum requirements of the preceding clause (x), may be awarded.

 

10.          Annual Incentive Awards. Subject to the terms of this Plan, the Committee will determine all terms and conditions of an Annual Incentive Award, including but not limited to the Performance Goals, performance period, the potential amount payable, the type of payment, and the timing of payment, subject to the following: (a) the Committee must require that payment of all or any portion of the amount subject to the Annual Incentive Award is contingent on the achievement or partial achievement of one or more Performance Goals during the period the Committee specifies, although the Committee may specify that all or a portion of the Performance Goals subject to an Award are deemed achieved upon a Participant’s death, Disability or Retirement; (b) the performance period must relate to a period of at least one fiscal year of the Company except that, if the Award is made at the time of commencement of employment with the Company or on the occasion of a promotion, then the Award may relate to a period shorter than one fiscal year; and (c) payment will be in cash except to the extent that the Committee determines that payment will be in Shares or Restricted Stock, either on a mandatory basis or at the election of the Participant, having a Fair Market Value at the time of the payment equal to the amount payable with respect to the Annual Incentive Award.

 

11.          Long-Term Incentive Awards. Subject to the terms of this Plan, the Committee will determine all terms and conditions of a Long-Term Incentive Award, including but not limited to the Performance Goals, performance period, the potential amount payable, the type of payment, and the timing of payment, subject to the following: (a) the Committee must require that payment of all or any

 

A-8



 

portion of the amount subject to the Long-Term Incentive Award is contingent on the achievement or partial achievement of one or more Performance Goals during the period the Committee specifies, although the Committee may specify that all or a portion of the Performance Goals subject to an Award are deemed achieved upon a Participant’s death, Disability or Retirement; (b) the performance period must relate to a period of more than one fiscal year of the Company except that, if the Award is made at the time of commencement of employment with the Company or on the occasion of a promotion, then the Award may relate to a shorter period; and (c) payment will be in cash except to the extent that the Committee determines that payment will be in Shares or Restricted Stock, either on a mandatory basis or at the election of the Participant, having a Fair Market Value at the time of the payment equal to the amount payable with respect to the Long-Term Incentive Award.

 

12.          Amendment of Minimum Vesting and Performance Periods.   Notwithstanding any provision of this Plan that requires a minimum vesting and/or performance period for an Award, the Committee, at the time an Award is granted or any later date, may subject an Award to a shorter vesting and/or performance period to take into account a Participant’s hire or promotion, or may accelerate the vesting or deem an Award to be earned, in whole or in part, in the event of a Participant’s death, Disability or Retirement.

 

13.          Transferability. Awards are not transferable other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, unless and to the extent the Committee allows a Participant to: (a) designate in writing a beneficiary to exercise the Award after the Participant’s death; or (b) transfer an Award.

 

14.          Termination and Amendment of Plan; Amendment, Modification or Cancellation of Awards.

 

(a)           Term of Plan . Unless the Board earlier terminates this Plan pursuant to Section 14(b), this Plan will terminate on the earlier of (i) the date that is 10 years from the Effective Date and (ii) the date when all Shares reserved for issuance have been issued.

 

(b)           Termination and Amendment . The Board or the Committee may amend, alter, suspend, discontinue or terminate this Plan at any time, subject to the following limitations:

 

(i) the Board must approve any amendment of this Plan to the extent the Company determines such approval is required by: (A) action of the Board, (B) applicable corporate law or (C) any other applicable law;

 

(ii) shareholders must approve any amendment of this Plan to the extent the Company determines such approval is required by: (A) Section 16 of the Exchange Act, (B) the Code, (C) the listing requirements of any principal securities exchange or market on which the Shares are then traded or (D) any other applicable law; and

 

(iii) shareholders must approve any of the following Plan amendments: (A) an amendment to materially increase any number of Shares specified in Section 6(a) or 6(d) (except as permitted by Section 16); or (B) an amendment to the provisions of Section 14(e).

 

(c)           Amendment, Modification, Cancellation or Recoupment of Awards .

 

(i) Except as provided in Section 14(e) and subject to the requirements of this Plan, the Committee may modify or amend any Award or waive any restrictions or conditions applicable to any Award or the exercise of the Award, and the terms and conditions applicable to any Awards may at any time be amended, modified or canceled by mutual agreement between the Committee and the Participant or any other person(s) as may then have an interest in the Award, so long as any amendment or modification does not increase the number of Shares issuable under this Plan (except as permitted by Section 16), but the Committee need not obtain Participant (or other

 

A-9



 

interested party) consent for the cancellation of an Award pursuant to the provisions of Section 16(a) or for the modification or amendment of an Award: (A) to the extent the modification or amendment is deemed necessary by the Committee to comply with any applicable law or the listing requirements of any principal securities exchange or market on which the Shares are then traded; (B) to the extent the modification or amendment is deemed necessary by the Committee to preserve favorable accounting or tax treatment of any Award for the Company; or (C) to the extent the Committee determines that such modification or amendment does not materially and adversely affect the value of an Award or that such modification or amendment is in the best interest of the affected Participant or any other person(s) as may then have an interest in the Award. In addition, except as provided in Section 14(e) and subject to the requirements of this Plan, the Committee may modify or amend any Award granted to a Participant under the 1990 Plan or the 2004 Plan, or waive any restrictions or conditions applicable to any such Award, to include Award terms consistent with the permitted terms of Awards granted under this Plan.

 

(ii) Any Awards granted pursuant to this Plan on or after September 30, 2011, and any Stock issued or cash paid pursuant to such an Award, shall be subject to any recoupment or clawback policy that may be adopted by the Company from time to time and to any requirement of applicable law, regulation or listing standard that requires the Company to recoup or clawback compensation paid pursuant to such an Award.

 

(d)           Survival of Authority and Awards . Notwithstanding the foregoing, the authority of the Board and the Committee under this Section 14 and to otherwise administer this Plan will extend beyond the date of this Plan’s termination. In addition, termination of this Plan will not affect the rights of Participants with respect to Awards previously granted to them, and all unexpired Awards will continue in force and effect after termination of this Plan except as they may lapse or be terminated by their own terms and conditions.

 

(e)           Repricing Prohibited . Except in connection with a corporate transaction involving the Company (including, without limitation, any stock dividend, distribution (whether in the form of cash, Shares, other securities or other property), stock split, extraordinary cash dividend, recapitalization, change in control, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, repurchase or exchange of Shares or other securities, or similar transaction(s)), the Company may not, without obtaining shareholder approval: (i) amend the terms of outstanding Options or SARs to reduce the exercise price of such outstanding Options or SARs; (b) cancel outstanding Options or SARs in exchange for Options or SARs with an exercise price that is less than the exercise price of the original Options or SARs; or (c) cancel outstanding Options or SARs with an exercise price above the current Stock price in exchange for cash or other securities.

 

(f)            Foreign Participation . To assure the viability of Awards granted to Participants employed or residing in foreign countries, the Committee may provide for such special terms as it may consider necessary or appropriate to accommodate differences in local law, tax policy or custom. Moreover, the Committee may approve such supplements to, or amendments, restatements or alternative versions of, this Plan as it determines is necessary or appropriate for such purposes. Any such amendment, restatement or alternative versions that the Committee approves for purposes of using this Plan in a foreign country will not affect the terms of this Plan for any other country. In addition, all such supplements, amendments, restatements or alternative versions must comply with the provisions of Section 14(b)(ii).

 

15.          Taxes.

 

(a)           Withholding .  The Company is entitled to withhold the amount of any tax attributable to any amount payable or Shares deliverable under this Plan, and the Company may defer making payment or delivery if any such tax may be pending unless and until indemnified to its satisfaction and may deduct (or require an Affiliate to deduct) from any payments of any kind otherwise due the Participant cash or,

 

A-10



 

with the consent of the Committee, Shares otherwise deliverable or vesting under an Award to satisfy such tax. If Shares are deliverable upon exercise or payment of an Award, the Committee may permit a Participant to satisfy all or a portion of the federal, state and local withholding tax obligations arising in connection with such Award by electing to (a) have the Company withhold Shares otherwise issuable under the Award, (b) tender back Shares received in connection with such Award or (c) deliver other previously owned Shares, in each case having a Fair Market Value equal to the amount to be withheld. However, the amount to be withheld may not exceed the total minimum federal, state and local tax withholding obligations associated with the transaction to the extent needed for the Company to avoid adverse accounting consequences. The election must be made on or before the date as of which the amount of tax to be withheld is determined and otherwise as the Committee requires.

 

(b)           No Guarantee of Tax Treatment .  Notwithstanding any provision of this Plan to the contrary, the Company does not guarantee to any Participant or any other person(s) with an interest in an Award that (i) any Award intended to be exempt from Code Section 409A shall be so exempt, (ii) any Award intended to comply with Code Section 409A or Code Section 422 shall so comply, or (iii) any Award shall otherwise receive a specific tax treatment under any other applicable tax law, nor in any such case will the Company or any Affiliate be required to indemnify, defend or hold harmless any individual with respect to the tax consequences of any Award.

 

16.          Adjustment Provisions; Change in Control.

 

(a)           Adjustment of Shares .  If (i) the Company shall at any time be involved in a merger or other transaction in which the Shares are changed or exchanged; or (ii) the Company shall subdivide or combine the Shares or the Company shall declare a dividend payable in Shares, other securities (other than any associated preferred stock purchase rights issued pursuant to that certain Rights Agreement, dated February 1, 1999, between the Company and ComputerShare Investor Services, LLC, as successor rights agent, or similar stock purchase rights that the Company might authorize and issue in the future) or other property; or (iii) the Company shall effect a cash dividend the amount of which exceeds 10% of the trading price of the Shares at the time the dividend is declared, or the Company shall effect any other dividend or other distribution on the Shares in the form of cash, or a repurchase of Shares, that the Board determines by resolution is special or extraordinary in nature or that is in connection with a transaction that the Company characterizes publicly as a recapitalization or reorganization involving the Shares; or (iv) any other event shall occur which, in the case of this clause (iv), in the judgment of the Committee necessitates an adjustment to prevent dilution or enlargement of the benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available under this Plan, then, subject to Participants’ rights under Section 16(c), the Committee shall, in such manner as it may deem equitable, adjust any or all of (A) the number and type of Shares subject to this Plan (including the number and type of Shares described in Sections 6(a) and 6(d)) and which may after the event be made the subject of Awards under this Plan, (B) the number and type of Shares subject to outstanding Awards, (C) the grant, purchase, or exercise price with respect to any Award; and (D) to the extent such discretion does not cause an Award that is intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code to lose its status as such, the Performance Goals of an Award.  If any of the transactions or events described in clauses (i) — (iv) constitutes a Change in Control or occurs subsequent to any Change in Control occurring after the Effective Date, then, subject to Participants’ rights under Section 16(c) and the cash payment provisions of the following sentence, and unless the Committee otherwise determines prior to the first Change in Control occurring after the Effective Date, proportionate adjustments of the type described in clauses (A) — (D) shall be made automatically such that the full economic value of the Awards to Participants that are outstanding at the time of the transaction or event shall be preserved and not diminished as a result of the transaction or event.  If any of the events described in clauses (i) — (iv) occurs, the Committee may also (or in lieu of the adjustments described in clauses (A) — (D)) make provision for a cash payment to the holder of an outstanding Award in exchange for the cancellation of all or a portion of the Award (without the consent of the holder of an Award) in an amount determined by the Committee effective at such time as the Committee specifies (which may be the time such transaction or event is effective), but if such transaction or event constitutes a Change in Control, then (1) such payment shall be at least as favorable to the holder as the greatest amount the

 

A-11



 

holder could have received in respect of such Award under Section 16(c), and (2) from and after the Change in Control, the Committee may make such a provision only if the Committee determines that doing so is necessary to substitute, for each Share then subject to an Award, the number and kind of shares of stock, other securities, cash or other property to which holders of Stock are or will be entitled in respect of each Share pursuant to the transaction or event in accordance with the last sentence of this Section 16(a). However, in each case, with respect to Awards of incentive stock options, no such adjustment may be authorized to the extent that such authority would cause this Plan to violate Code Section 422(b). Further, the number of Shares subject to any Award payable or denominated in Shares must always be a whole number. In any event, Options previously granted to Non-Employee Directors at the time of any event described in this Section 16(a) are subject to only such adjustments as are necessary to maintain the relative proportionate interest the Options represented immediately prior to any such event and to preserve, without exceeding, the value of such Options. Without limitation, subject to Participants’ rights under Section 16(c), in the event of any such merger or similar transaction, subdivision or combination of Shares, dividend or other event described above, whether or not constituting a Change in Control (other than any such transaction in which the Company is the continuing corporation and in which the outstanding Stock is not being converted into or exchanged for different securities, cash or other property, or any combination thereof), the Committee shall substitute, on an equitable basis as the Committee determines, for each Share then subject to an Award, the number and kind of shares of stock, other securities, cash or other property to which holders of Stock are or will be entitled in respect of each Share pursuant to the transaction. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Company shall subdivide the Shares or the Company shall declare a dividend payable in Shares, and if no action is taken by the Board or the Committee, then the adjustments contemplated by this Section 16(a) that are proportionate shall nevertheless automatically be made as of the date of such subdivision of the Shares or dividend in Shares.

 

(b)           Issuance or Assumption . Notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan, and without affecting the number of Shares otherwise reserved or available under this Plan, in connection with any merger, consolidation, acquisition of property or stock, or reorganization, the Committee may authorize the issuance or assumption of awards under this Plan upon such terms and conditions as it may deem appropriate.

 

(c)           Change in Control . Except to the extent the Committee provides a result more favorable to holders of Awards (either in an award agreement or at the time of a Change in Control), in the event of a Change in Control:

 

(i) each holder of an Option or SAR (A) shall have the right at any time thereafter to exercise the Option or SAR in full whether or not the Option or SAR was theretofore exercisable; and (B) shall have the right, exercisable by written notice to the Company within 60 days after the Change in Control, to receive, in exchange for the surrender of the Option or SAR, an amount of cash equal to the excess of the Fair Market Value of the Shares covered by the Option or SAR that is so surrendered on the date of surrender of the Option or SAR over the purchase or grant price of such Shares under the Award;

 

(ii) Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units that are not then vested shall vest upon the date of the Change in Control and each holder of such Restricted Stock or such Restricted Stock Units shall have the right, exercisable by written notice to the Company within 60 days after the Change in Control, to receive, in exchange for the surrender of such Restricted Stock or the cancellation of such Restricted Stock Units, as applicable, an amount of cash equal to the Change in Control Price of such Restricted Stock or the number of Shares to which such Restricted Stock Units relate;

 

(iii) each holder of a Performance Share and/or Performance Unit for which the performance period has not expired shall have the right, exercisable by written notice to the Company within 60 days after the Change in Control, to receive, in exchange for the surrender of

 

A-12



 

the Performance Share and/or Performance Unit, an amount of cash equal to the product of the value of the Performance Share and/or Performance Unit and a fraction the numerator of which is the number of whole months that have elapsed from the beginning of the performance period to which the Award is subject to the date of the Change in Control and the denominator of which is the number of whole months in the performance period;

 

(iv) each holder of a Performance Share and/or Performance Unit that has been earned but not yet paid shall receive an amount of cash equal to the value of the Performance Share and/or Performance Unit; and

 

(v) all Annual and Long-Term Incentive Awards that are earned but not yet paid shall be paid, and all Annual and Long-Term Incentive Awards that are not yet earned shall be deemed to have been earned pro rata, as if the Performance Goals are attained as of the effective date of the Change in Control, by taking the product of (A) the Participant’s target award opportunity for the period to which the Award is subject, and (B) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of whole months that have elapsed from the beginning of the performance period to which the Award is subject to the date of the Change in Control and the denominator of which is the number of whole months in the performance period.

 

For purposes of this Section 16, the “value” of a Performance Share shall be equal to, and the “value” of a Performance Unit the value of which is equal to the Fair Market Value of one or more Shares shall be based on, the Change in Control Price.

 

Except as otherwise expressly provided in any agreement between a Participant and the Company (including where any such agreement makes reference to corresponding provisions of the 1990 Plan rather than this Plan), if the receipt of any payment by a Participant under the circumstances described above would result in the payment by the Participant of any excise tax provided for in Section 280G and Section 4999 of the Code, then the amount of such payment shall be reduced to the extent required to prevent the imposition of such excise tax.

 

17.          Miscellaneous.

 

(a)           Other Terms and Conditions . The grant of any Award may also be subject to other provisions (whether or not applicable to the Award granted to any other Participant) as the Committee determines appropriate, including, without limitation, provisions for:

 

(i) one or more means to enable Participants to defer the delivery of Shares or recognition of taxable income relating to Awards or cash payments derived from the Awards on such terms and conditions as the Committee determines, including, by way of example, the form and manner of the deferral election, the treatment of dividends paid on the Shares during the deferral period or a means for providing a return to a Participant on amounts deferred, and the permitted distribution dates or events (provided that no such deferral means may result in an increase in the number of Shares issuable under this Plan);

 

(ii) the payment of the purchase price of Options (A) by delivery of cash or other Shares or other securities of the Company (including by attestation) having a then Fair Market Value equal to the purchase price of such Shares, (B) by delivery (including by fax) to the Company or its designated agent of an executed irrevocable option exercise form together with irrevocable instructions to a broker-dealer to sell or margin a sufficient portion of the Shares and deliver the sale or margin loan proceeds directly to the Company to pay for the exercise price, (C) by surrendering the right to receive Shares otherwise deliverable to the Participant upon exercise of the Award having a Fair Market Value at the time of exercise equal to the total exercise price, or (D) by any combination of (A), (B) and/or (C);

 

A-13



 

(iii) except in connection with the grant of Awards providing Options or SARs, for which Awards this subsection is not applicable, provisions giving the Participant the right to receive dividend payments or dividend equivalent payments with respect to the Shares subject to the Award (but only after the Shares subject to the Award are earned, vested or acquired), which payments may be either made currently or credited to a nonqualified deferred compensation account for the Participant that complies with the applicable requirements of Code Section 409A, provides for the deferral of payment of such amounts to a specified employee or until a specified event described in Code Section 409A(a)(2), and may be settled in cash or Shares, as the Committee determines;

 

(iv) restrictions on resale or other disposition of Shares; and

 

(v) compliance with federal or state securities laws and stock exchange requirements.

 

(b)           Employment and Service . The issuance of an Award shall not confer upon a Participant any right with respect to continued employment or service with the Company or any Affiliate, or the right to continue as a Director. Unless determined otherwise by the Committee, for purposes of this Plan and all Awards, the following rules shall apply:

 

(i) a Participant who transfers employment between the Corporation and its Subsidiaries, or between Subsidiaries, will not be considered to have terminated employment;

 

(ii) a Participant who ceases to be a Non-Employee Director because he or she becomes an employee of the Company or a Subsidiary shall not be considered to have ceased service as a Director with respect to any Award until such Participant’s termination of employment with the Company and its Subsidiaries;

 

(iii) a Participant who ceases to be employed by the Company or a Subsidiary and immediately thereafter becomes a Non-Employee Director, a non-employee director of a Subsidiary, or a consultant to the Company or any Subsidiary shall not be considered to have terminated employment with the Company or any of its Subsidiaries until such Participant’s service as a director of, or consultant to, the Company and its Subsidiaries has ceased; and

 

(iv) a Participant employed by a Subsidiary will be considered to have terminated employment when such entity ceases to be a Subsidiary.

 

Notwithstanding the foregoing, for purposes of an Award that is subject to Code Section 409A, if a Participant’s termination of employment with the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or service triggers the payment of compensation under such Award, then the Participant will be deemed to have terminated employment or service upon his or her “separation from service” within the meaning of  Code Section 409A.  Notwithstanding any other provision in this Plan or an Award to the contrary, if any Participant is a “specified employee” within the meaning of Code Section 409A as of the date of his or her “separation from service” within the meaning of Code Section 409A, then, to the extent required to avoid the income inclusion, interest and additional tax imposed by Code Section 409A, any payment made to the Participant on account of such separation from service shall not be made before a date that is six months after the date of the separation from service.

 

(c)           No Fractional Shares . No fractional Shares or other securities may be issued or delivered pursuant to this Plan, and the Committee may determine whether cash, other securities or other property will be paid or transferred in lieu of any fractional Shares or other securities, or whether such fractional Shares or other securities or any rights to fractional Shares or other securities will be canceled, terminated or otherwise eliminated.

 

A-14



 

(d)           Unfunded Plan . This Plan is unfunded and does not create, and should not be construed to create, a trust or separate fund with respect to this Plan’s benefits. This Plan does not establish any fiduciary relationship between the Company and any Participant or other person. To the extent any person holds any rights by virtue of an Award granted under this Plan, such rights are no greater than the rights of the Company’s general unsecured creditors.

 

(e)           Requirements of Law and Securities Exchange . The granting of Awards and the issuance of Shares in connection with an Award are subject to all applicable laws, rules and regulations and to such approvals by any governmental agencies or national securities exchanges as may be required. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan or any award agreement, the Company has no liability to deliver any Shares under this Plan or make any payment unless such delivery or payment would comply with all applicable laws and the applicable requirements of any securities exchange or similar entity, and unless and until the Participant has taken all actions required by the Company in connection therewith. The Company may impose such restrictions on any Shares issued under this Plan as the Company determines necessary or desirable to comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations or the requirements of any national securities exchanges. Notwithstanding any provision of this Plan or any document pertaining to Awards granted hereunder to the contrary, this Plan shall be so construed, interpreted and administered to meet the applicable requirements of Code Section 409A to avoid a plan failure described in Code Section 409A(a)(1).

 

(f)            Governing Law . This Plan, and all agreements under this Plan, will be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Wisconsin, without reference to any conflict of law principles. Any legal action or proceeding with respect to this Plan, any Award or any award agreement, or for recognition and enforcement of any judgment in respect of this Plan, any Award or any award agreement, may be heard only in a “bench” trial, and any party to such action or proceeding shall agree to waive its right to a jury trial.

 

(g)           Limitations on Actions . Any legal action or proceeding with respect to this Plan, any Award or any award agreement must be brought within one year (365 days) after the day the complaining party first knew or should have known of the events giving rise to the complaint.

 

(h)           Construction . Whenever any words are used herein in the masculine, they shall be construed as though they were used in the feminine in all cases where they would so apply; and wherever any words are used in the singular or plural, they shall be construed as though they were used in the plural or singular, as the case may be, in all cases where they would so apply. Title of sections are for general information only, and this Plan is not to be construed with reference to such titles.

 

(i)            Severability . If any provision of this Plan or any award agreement or any Award (i) is or becomes or is deemed to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any jurisdiction, or as to any person or Award, or (ii) would disqualify this Plan, any award agreement or any Award under any law the Committee deems applicable, then such provision should be construed or deemed amended to conform to applicable laws, or if it cannot be so construed or deemed amended without, in the determination of the Committee, materially altering the intent of this Plan, award agreement or Award, then such provision should be stricken as to such jurisdiction, person or Award, and the remainder of this Plan, such award agreement and such Award will remain in full force and effect.

 

A-15


Exhibit (31.1)

 

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, Charles L. Szews, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Oshkosh Corporation;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)          Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)          Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

(c)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(d)          Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

(a)          All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)          Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

April 26, 2012

/S/ Charles L. Szews

 

Charles L. Szews

 

President and Chief Executive Officer

 


Exhibit (31.2)

 

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, David M. Sagehorn, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Oshkosh Corporation;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)          Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)          Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

(c)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(d)          Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

(a)          All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)          Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

April 26, 2012

/S/ David M. Sagehorn

 

David M. Sagehorn

 

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 


Exhibit (32.1)

 

Written Statement of the President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of Oshkosh Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/S/ Charles L. Szews

 

Charles L. Szews

 

April 26, 2012

 

 


Exhibit (32.2)

 

Written Statement of the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, I, the undersigned Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Oshkosh Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/S/ David M. Sagehorn

 

David M. Sagehorn

 

April 26, 2012