STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

TRUST HISTORY

This Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) describes two mutual funds (each, a “Fund” and collectively, the “Funds”) offered by Schroder Series Trust (the “Trust”).

The Trust is a Massachusetts business trust organized under the laws of The Commonwealth of Massachusetts on May 6, 1993.  The Trust’s Agreement and Declaration of Trust, as amended (the “Declaration of Trust”), which is governed by Massachusetts law, is on file with the Secretary of The Commonwealth of Massachusetts.  Schroder Series Trust currently comprises seven series, of which two series, Schroder Long Duration Investment-Grade Bond Fund and Schroder Broad Tax-Aware Value Bond Fund, are described in this SAI.

Shares of each Fund are being offered through the Prospectus and this SAI only after the closing of the acquisition by Schroder Long Duration Investment-Grade Bond Fund of the assets of STW Long Duration Investment-Grade Bond Fund, a series of The Advisors’ Inner Circle Fund II, and the acquisition by Schroder Broad Tax-Aware Value Bond Fund of the assets of STW Broad Tax-Aware Value Bond Fund, a series of The Advisors’ Inner Circle Fund II (together with STW Long Duration Fund, the “Predecessor Funds”) pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated May 3, 2013 (the “Fund Mergers”).  Each of the Predecessor Funds had been advised by STW Fixed Income Management LLC (“STW”) since their inception on October 3, 2011, and on April 2, 2013, Schroder U.S. Holdings Inc., the parent company of Schroder Investment Management North America Inc. (“Schroders”), acquired all outstanding interests in STW.  Because the Funds had no investment operations prior to the closing of the Fund Mergers, and based on the similarity of the Funds to the Predecessor Funds, each Predecessor Fund is treated as the survivor of the relevant Fund Merger for accounting and performance reporting purposes.  Accordingly, all performance and other information shown for the Funds for periods prior to the date of this SAI is that of the Predecessor Funds.

Schroders serves as investment manager to the Funds.  STW serves as investment sub-adviser to the Funds.

FUND CLASSIFICATION

Each Fund is an open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act” or “1940 Act”).

The Funds are “diversified” investment companies under the Investment Company Act, which means that with respect to 75% of a Fund’s total assets (i) that Fund may not invest in securities of any issuer if, immediately after such investment, more than 5% of the total assets of that Fund (taken at current value) would be invested in the securities of that issuer (this limitation does not apply to investments in U.S. Government securities or securities of other investment companies) and (ii) that Fund may not invest in a security if, as a result of such investment, it would hold more than 10% (taken at the time of such investment) of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer (this limitation does not apply to investments in U.S. Government securities or securities of other investment companies).  Neither Fund is subject to this limitation with respect to the remaining 25% of its total assets.  To the extent a Fund invests a significant portion of its assets in the securities of a particular issuer, it will be subject to an increased risk of loss if the market value of the issuer’s securities declines.

Under the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), to qualify as a regulated investment company (a “RIC”), a Fund must meet certain diversification requirements as determined at the close of each quarter of each taxable year. For instance, no more than 25% of a Fund’s assets can be invested in the securities of any one issuer other than U.S. Government securities and securities of other regulated investment companies or of two or more issuers which the Fund controls and which are engaged in the same, similar, or related trades or businesses. In addition, at least 50% of the market value of a Fund’s assets must be represented by cash or cash items, U.S. government securities, securities of other regulated investment companies, and other securities limited in respect of any one issuer to a value not greater than 5% of the value of a Fund’s total assets and to not more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of such issuer. Thus, up to 50% of a Fund’s total assets can consist of the securities of as few as two issuers (so long as no issuer’s securities comprise more than 25% of such Fund).

These policies may not be changed without the vote of a “majority of the outstanding voting securities” (as defined below in “Investment Restrictions”) of the relevant Fund.

1

CAPITALIZATION AND SHARE CLASSES

The Trust has an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest that may, without shareholder approval, be divided into an unlimited number of series of such shares, which, in turn, may be divided into an unlimited number of classes of such shares.  The shares of the Funds currently have one class, Investor Shares. The Funds may suspend the sale of shares at any time.

Shares of each Fund entitle their holders to one vote per share, with fractional shares voting proportionally; however, a separate vote will be taken by each Fund on matters affecting a particular Fund, as determined by the Trustees.  For example, a change in a fundamental investment policy for a Fund would be voted upon only by shareholders of that Fund.  Shares have noncumulative voting rights. Although the Trust is not required to hold annual meetings of its shareholders, shareholders have the right to call a meeting to elect or remove Trustees or to take other actions as provided in the Trust’s Declaration of Trust.  Shares have no preemptive or subscription rights, and are transferable.  Shares are entitled to dividends as declared by the Trust as approved by the Trustees.

A company’s preferred stock generally pays a dividend only after the company makes required payments to holders of its bonds and other debt.  In addition, the rights of preferred stock on distribution of a company’s assets in the event of a liquidation are generally subordinate to the rights of holders of the company’s bonds or other creditors.  As a result, the value of preferred stock will usually react more strongly than bonds and other debt to actual or perceived changes in the company’s financial condition or prospects.  Preferred stocks of small companies may be more vulnerable to adverse developments than those of larger companies.

Certain Derivative Instruments.   Derivative instruments are financial instruments whose value depends upon, or is derived from, the value of an underlying asset, such as a security, index or currency.  Use of derivatives other than for hedging purposes may be considered speculative, and when a Fund invests in a derivative instrument it could lose more than the principal amount invested.  A Fund’s use of derivatives may cause the Fund to recognize higher amounts of short-term capital gains, generally taxed to shareholders at ordinary income tax rates. Investments in derivatives may be applied toward meeting a requirement to invest in a particular kind of investment if the derivatives have economic characteristics similar to that investment.

The counterparties to the Funds’ derivatives transactions may not be considered the issuers of securities for certain purposes of the 1940 Act and the Code.  The Funds’ adviser will monitor the Funds’ credit risk exposure to derivative counterparties to prevent excess concentration to any one counterparty.

A Fund may use these “derivatives” strategies for hedging purposes or, to the extent permitted by applicable law, to increase its current return.  A Fund may also use derivatives to gain exposure to securities or market sectors as a substitute for cash investments (not for leverage) or pending the sale of securities by the Fund and reinvestment of the proceeds.  For example, a Fund may seek to obtain market exposure to the securities in which it may invest by entering into forward contracts or similar arrangements to purchase those securities in the future.  Any use of derivatives strategies entails the risks of investing directly in the securities or instruments underlying the derivatives strategies, as well as the risks of using derivatives generally, described in the Prospectus and in this SAI.

Options. A Fund may purchase and sell put and call options on its portfolio securities to protect against changes in market prices and for other purposes.

Call options. A Fund may write call options on its portfolio securities for various purposes, including without limitation to realize a greater current return through the receipt of premiums than it would realize on its securities alone.  Such transactions may also be used as a limited form of hedging against a decline in the price of securities owned by a Fund. A call option gives the holder the right to purchase, and obligates the writer to sell, a security at the exercise price at any time before the expiration date.  A Fund may write covered call options or uncovered call options. A call option is “covered” if the writer, at all times while obligated as a writer, either owns the underlying securities (or comparable securities satisfying the cover requirements of the securities exchanges), or has the right to acquire such securities through immediate conversion of securities. When a Fund has written an uncovered call option, the Fund will not necessarily hold securities offsetting the risk to the Fund. As a result, if the call option were exercised, the Fund might be required to purchase the security that is the subject of the call at the market price at the time of exercise. The Fund’s exposure on such an option is theoretically unlimited.

In return for the premium received when it writes a call option, a Fund gives up some or all of the opportunity to profit from an increase in the market price of the securities covering the call option during the life of the option. The Fund retains the risk of loss should the price of such securities decline. If the option expires unexercised, the Fund realizes a gain equal to the premium, which may be offset by a decline in price of the underlying security. If the option is exercised, the Fund realizes a gain or loss equal to the difference between the Fund’s cost for the underlying security and the proceeds of the sale (exercise price minus commissions) plus the amount of the premium.

A Fund may terminate a call option that it has written before it expires by entering into a closing purchase transaction.  A Fund may enter into closing purchase transactions in order to realize a profit on a previously written call option or, in the case of a covered call option, to free itself to sell the underlying security or to write another call on the security or protect a security from being called in an unexpected market rise.

Any profits from a closing purchase transaction in the case of a covered call option may be offset by a decline in the value of the underlying security. Conversely, because increases in the market price of a call option will generally reflect increases in the market price of the underlying security, any loss resulting from a closing purchase transaction relating to a covered call option is likely to be offset in whole or in part by unrealized appreciation of the underlying security owned by a Fund.

Covered put options. A Fund may write covered put options in order to enhance its current return. Such options transactions may also be used as a limited form of hedging against an increase in the price of securities that the Fund plans to purchase. A put option gives the holder the right to sell, and obligates the writer to buy, a security at the exercise price at any time before the

3

expiration date. A put option is “covered” if the writer segregates cash and high-grade short-term debt obligations or other permissible collateral equal to the price to be paid if the option is exercised.

In addition to the receipt of premiums and the potential gains from terminating such options in closing purchase transactions, a Fund also receives interest on the cash and debt securities maintained to cover the exercise price of the option. By writing a put option, a Fund assumes the risk that it may be required to purchase the underlying security for an exercise price higher than its then current market value, resulting in a potential capital loss unless the security later appreciates in value.

A Fund may terminate a put option that it has written before it expires by a closing purchase transaction. Any loss from this transaction may be partially or entirely offset by the premium received on the terminated option.

Purchasing put and call options. A Fund may also purchase put options to protect portfolio holdings against a decline in market value.  This protection lasts for the life of the put option because the Fund, as a holder of the option, may sell the underlying security at the exercise price regardless of any decline in its market price. In order for a put option to be profitable, the market price of the underlying security must decline sufficiently below the exercise price to cover the premium and transaction costs that the Fund must pay. These costs will reduce any profit the Fund might have realized had it sold the underlying security instead of buying the put option.

A Fund may purchase call options to hedge against an increase in the price of securities that a Fund wants ultimately to buy.  Such hedge protection is provided during the life of the call option since the Fund, as holder of the call option, are able to buy the underlying security at the exercise price regardless of any increase in the underlying security’s market price. In order for a call option to be profitable, the market price of the underlying security must rise sufficiently above the exercise price to cover the premium and transaction costs. These costs will reduce any profit the Fund might have realized had it bought the underlying security at the time it purchased the call option.

A Fund may also purchase put and call options to enhance its current return. A Fund may also buy and sell combinations of put and call options on the same underlying security to earn additional income.

Options on foreign securities. It is expected that risks related to options on foreign securities will not differ materially from risks related to options on U.S. securities. However, position limits and other rules of foreign exchanges may differ from those in the U.S. In addition, options markets in some countries, many of which are relatively new, may be less liquid than comparable markets in the U.S.

Risks involved in the sale of options. Options transactions involve certain risks, including the risks that Schroders. will not forecast interest rate or market movements correctly, that a Fund may be unable at times to close out such positions, or that hedging transactions may not accomplish their purpose because of imperfect market correlations. The successful use of these strategies depends on the ability of Schroders to forecast market and interest rate movements correctly.

An exchange-listed option may be closed out only on an exchange that provides a secondary market for an option of the same series. Although a Fund will enter into an option position only if Schroders believes that a liquid secondary market exists, there is no assurance that a liquid secondary market on an exchange will exist for any particular option or at any particular time. If no secondary market were to exist, it would be impossible to enter into a closing transaction to close out an option position. As a result, a Fund may be forced to continue to hold, or to purchase at a fixed price, a security on which it has sold an option at a time when Schroders believes it is inadvisable to do so.

Higher than anticipated trading activity or order flow or other unforeseen events might cause The Options Clearing Corporation or an exchange to institute special trading procedures or restrictions that might restrict a Fund’s use of options. The exchanges have established limitations on the maximum number of calls and puts of each class that may be held or written by an investor or group of investors acting in concert. It is possible that the Funds and other clients of Schroders may be considered such a group. These position limits may restrict the Funds’ ability to purchase or sell options on particular securities.

As described below, each Fund generally expects that its options transactions will be conducted on recognized exchanges. In certain instances, however, a Fund may purchase and sell options in the over-the-counter markets. Options that are not traded on national securities exchanges may be closed out only with the other party to the option transaction. For that reason, it may be more difficult to close out over-the-counter options than exchange-traded options. Options in the over-the-counter market may also involve the risk that securities dealers participating in such transactions would be unable to meet their obligations to a Fund. Furthermore, over-the-counter options are not subject to the protection afforded purchasers of exchange-traded options by The Options Clearing Corporation. A Fund will, however, engage in over-the-counter options transactions only when appropriate exchange-traded options

4

transactions are unavailable and when, in the opinion of Schroders, the pricing mechanism and liquidity of the over-the-counter markets are satisfactory and the participants are responsible parties likely to meet their contractual obligations. A Fund will treat over-the-counter options (and, in the case of options sold by the Fund, the underlying securities held by the Fund) as illiquid investments as required by applicable law.

Government regulations, particularly the requirements for qualification as a RIC under the Code, may also restrict a Trust’s use of options.

Futures Contracts.   A Fund may buy and sell futures contracts, options on futures contracts, and related instruments in order to hedge against the effects of adverse market changes or to increase current return.  Depending upon the change in the value of the underlying security or index when that Fund enters into or terminates a futures contract, that Fund may realize a gain or loss.

Futures on Securities and Related Options.   A futures contract on a security is a binding contractual commitment that, if held to maturity, will result in an obligation to make or accept delivery, during a particular month, of securities having a standardized face value and rate of return.  By purchasing futures on securities — assuming a “long” position — the Fund will legally obligate itself to accept the future delivery of the underlying security and pay the agreed price.  By selling futures on securities — assuming a “short” position — it will legally obligate itself to make the future delivery of the security against payment of the agreed price.  Open futures positions on securities will be valued at the most recent settlement price, unless that price does not, in the judgment of the Trusts’ fair value committee, reflect the fair value of the contract, in which case the positions will be fair valued by the Trustees or the fair value committee.

Positions taken in the futures markets are not normally held to maturity, but are instead liquidated through offsetting transactions that may result in a profit or a loss.  While futures positions taken by a Fund will usually be liquidated in this manner, a Fund may instead make or take delivery of the underlying securities whenever it appears in Schroders’ judgment economically advantageous for the Fund to do so.  A clearing corporation associated with the exchange on which futures are traded assumes responsibility for such closing transactions and guarantees that a Fund’s sale and purchase obligations under closed-out positions will be performed at the termination of the contract.

Hedging by use of futures on securities seeks to establish more certainty with respect to the effective rate of return on portfolio securities.  A Fund may, for example, take a “short” position in the futures market by selling contracts for the future delivery of securities held by the Fund (or securities having characteristics similar to those held by the Fund) in order to hedge against an anticipated rise in interest rates that would adversely affect the value of the Fund’s portfolio securities.  When hedging of this character is successful, any depreciation in the value of portfolio securities may substantially be offset by appreciation in the value of the futures position.

On other occasions, a Fund may take a “long” position by purchasing futures on securities.  This would be done, for example, when a Fund expects to purchase particular securities when it has the necessary cash, but expects the rate of return available in the securities markets at that time to be less favorable than rates currently available in the futures markets.  If the anticipated rise in the price of the securities should occur (with its concomitant reduction in yield), the increased cost to the Fund of purchasing the securities may be offset, at least to some extent, by the rise in the value of the futures position taken in anticipation of the subsequent securities purchase.

A Fund may also use futures to adjust the duration of its fixed income portfolio and otherwise to manage (increase or decrease) its exposure to interest rate risk.

Successful use by a Fund of futures contracts on securities is subject to Schroders’ ability to predict correctly movements in the direction of the security’s price and factors affecting markets for securities.  For example, if a Fund has hedged against the possibility of an increase in interest rates that would adversely affect the market prices of securities held by it and the prices of such securities increase instead, the Fund will lose part or all of the benefit of the increased value of its securities that it has hedged because it will have offsetting losses in its futures positions.  In addition, in such situations, if the Fund has insufficient cash, it may have to sell securities to meet daily maintenance margin requirements.  A Fund may have to sell securities at a time when it may be disadvantageous to do so.

A Fund may purchase and write put and call options on certain futures contracts, as they become available.  Such options are similar to options on securities except that options on futures contracts give the purchaser the right, in return for the premium paid, to assume a position in a futures contract (a long position if the option is a call and a short position if the option is a put) at a specified exercise price at any time during the period of the option.  As with options on securities, the holder or writer of an option may terminate his position by selling or purchasing an option of the same series.  There is no guarantee that such closing transactions can

5

be effected.  A Fund will be required to deposit initial margin and maintenance margin with respect to put and call options on futures contracts written by it pursuant to brokers’ requirements, and, in addition, net option premiums received will be included as initial margin deposits.  See “Margin Payments” below.  Compared to the purchase or sale of futures contracts, the purchase of call or put options on futures contracts involves less potential risk to a Fund because the maximum amount at risk is the premium paid for the options plus transactions costs.  However, there may be circumstances when the purchase of call or put options on a futures contract would result in a loss to a Fund when the purchase or sale of the futures contracts would not, such as when there is no movement in the prices of securities.  The writing of a put or call option on a futures contract involves risks similar to those risks relating to the purchase or sale of futures contracts.

Index Futures Contracts and Options.   A debt index futures contract is a contract to buy or sell units of a specified debt index at a specified future date at a price agreed upon when the contract is made.  A unit is the current value of the index.  A stock index futures contract is a contract to buy or sell units of a stock index at a specified future date at a price agreed upon when the contract is made.  A unit is the current value of the stock index.

Depending on the change in the value of the index between the time when a Fund enters into and terminates an index futures transaction, a Fund may realize a gain or loss.  The following example illustrates generally the manner in which index futures contracts operate.  The Standard & Poor’s 100 Stock Index is composed of 100 selected common stocks, most of which are listed on the New York Stock Exchange. The S&P 100 Index assigns relative weightings to the common stocks included in the Index, and the Index fluctuates with changes in the market values of those common stocks.  In the case of the S&P 100 Index, contracts are to buy or sell 100 units.  Thus, if the value of the S&P 100 Index were $180, one contract would be worth $18,000 (100 units x $180).  The stock index futures contract specifies that no delivery of the actual stocks making up the index will take place.  Instead, settlement in cash must occur upon the termination of the contract, with the settlement being the difference between the contract price and the actual level of the stock index at the expiration of the contract.  For example, if a Fund enters into a futures contract to buy 100 units of the S&P 100 Index at a specified future date at a contract price of $180 and the S&P 100 Index is at $184 on that future date, the Fund will gain $400 (100 units x gain of $4).  If a Fund enters into a futures contract to sell 100 units of the stock index at a specified future date at a contract price of $180 and the S&P 100 Index is at $182 on that future date, the Fund will lose $200 (100 units x loss of $2).

Positions in index futures may be closed out only on an exchange or board of trade that provides a secondary market for such futures.

In order to hedge a Fund’s investments successfully using futures contracts and related options, a Fund must invest in futures contracts with respect to indices or sub-indices the movements of which will, in Schroders’ judgment, have a significant correlation with movements in the prices of the Fund’s portfolio securities.

Options on index futures contracts are similar to options on securities except that options on index futures contracts give the purchaser the right, in return for the premium paid, to assume a position in an index futures contract (a long position if the option is a call and a short position if the option is a put) at a specified exercise price at any time during the period of the option.  Upon exercise of the option, the holder would assume the underlying futures position and would receive a variation margin payment of cash or securities approximating the increase in the value of the holder’s option position.  If an option is exercised on the last trading day prior to the expiration date of the option, the settlement will be made entirely in cash based on the difference between the exercise price of the option and the closing level of the index on which the futures contract is based on the expiration date.  Purchasers of options who fail to exercise their options prior to the exercise date suffer a loss of the premium paid.

As an alternative to purchasing and selling call and put options on index futures contracts, a Fund may purchase and sell call and put options on the underlying indices themselves to the extent that such options are traded on national securities exchanges.  Index options are similar to options on individual securities in that the purchaser of an index option acquires the right to buy (in the case of a call) or sell (in the case of a put), and the writer undertakes the obligation to sell or buy (as the case may be), units of an index at a stated exercise price during the term of the option.  Instead of giving the right to take or make actual delivery of securities, the holder of an index option has the right to receive a cash “exercise settlement amount.”  This amount is equal to the amount by which the fixed exercise price of the option exceeds (in the case of a put) or is less than (in the case of a call) the closing value of the underlying index on the date of the exercise, multiplied by a fixed “index multiplier.”

A Fund may purchase or sell options on stock indices in order to close out its outstanding positions in options on stock indices that it has purchased.  A Fund may also allow such options to expire unexercised.

Compared to the purchase or sale of futures contracts, the purchase of call or put options on an index involves less potential risk to a Fund because the maximum amount at risk is the premium paid for the options plus transactions costs.  The writing of a put or call option on an index involves risks similar to those risks relating to the purchase or sale of index futures contracts.

6

Margin Payments.  When a Fund purchases or sells a futures contract, it is required to deposit with its custodian or with a futures commission merchant an amount of cash, U.S. Treasury bills, or other permissible collateral equal to a small percentage of the amount of the futures contract.  This amount is known as “initial margin.”  The nature of initial margin is different from that of margin in security transactions in that it does not involve borrowing money to finance transactions.  Rather, initial margin is similar to a performance bond or good faith deposit that is returned to the Fund upon termination of the contract, assuming the Fund satisfies its contractual obligations.

Subsequent payments to and from the broker occur on a daily basis in a process known as “marking to market.”  These payments are called “variation margin” and are made as the value of the underlying futures contract fluctuates.  For example, when a Fund sells a futures contract and the price of the underlying security rises above the delivery price, the Fund’s position declines in value.  The Fund then pays the broker a variation margin payment equal to the difference between the delivery price of the futures contract and the market price of the securities underlying the futures contract.  Conversely, if the price of the underlying security falls below the delivery price of the contract, the Fund’s futures position increases in value.  The broker then must make a variation margin payment equal to the difference between the delivery price of the futures contract and the market price of the securities underlying the futures contract.

When a Fund terminates a position in a futures contract, a final determination of variation margin is made, additional cash is paid by or to the Fund, and the Fund realizes a loss or a gain.  Such closing transactions involve additional commission costs.

Special Risks of Transactions in Futures Contracts and Related Options

Liquidity Risks.   Positions in futures contracts may be closed out only on an exchange or board of trade that provides a secondary market for such futures.  Although the Funds intend to purchase or sell futures only on exchanges or boards of trade where there appears to be an active secondary market, there is no assurance that a liquid secondary market on an exchange or board of trade will exist for any particular contract or at any particular time.  If there is not a liquid secondary market at a particular time, it may not be possible to close a futures position at such time and, in the event of adverse price movements, a Fund would continue to be required to make daily cash payments of variation margin.  However, in the event financial futures are used to hedge portfolio securities, such securities will not generally be sold until the financial futures can be terminated.  In such circumstances, an increase in the price of the portfolio securities, if any, may partially or completely offset losses on the financial futures.

In addition to the risks that apply to all options transactions, there are several special risks relating to options on futures contracts.  The ability to establish and close out positions in such options will be subject to the development and maintenance of a liquid secondary market.  It is not certain that such a market will develop.  Although a Fund generally will purchase only those options for which there appears to be an active secondary market, there is no assurance that a liquid secondary market on an exchange will exist for any particular option or at any particular time.  In the event no such market exists for particular options, it might not be possible to effect closing transactions in such options with the result that the Fund would have to exercise the options in order to realize any profit.

Hedging Risks.  There are several risks in connection with the use by a Fund of futures contracts and related options as a hedging device.  One risk arises because of the imperfect correlation between movements in the prices of the futures contracts and options and movements in the underlying securities or index or in the prices of a Fund’s securities that are the subject of a hedge.  Schroders will, however, attempt to reduce this risk by purchasing and selling, to the extent possible, futures contracts and related options on securities and indices the movements of which will, in its judgment, correlate closely with movements in the prices of the underlying securities or index and the Fund’s portfolio securities sought to be hedged.

Successful use of futures contracts and options by a Fund for hedging purposes is also subject to Schroders’ ability to predict correctly movements in the direction of the market.  It is possible that, where a Fund has purchased puts on futures contracts to hedge its portfolio against a decline in the market, the securities or index on which the puts are purchased may increase in value and the value of securities held in the portfolio may decline.  If this occurred, the Fund would lose money on the puts and also experience a decline in value in its portfolio securities.  In addition, the prices of futures, for a number of reasons, may not correlate perfectly with movements in the underlying securities or index due to certain market distortions.  First, all participants in the futures market are subject to margin deposit requirements.  Such requirements may cause investors to close futures contracts through offsetting transactions, which could distort the normal relationship between the underlying security or index and futures markets.  Second, the margin requirements in the futures markets are less onerous than margin requirements in the securities markets in general, and as a result the futures markets may attract more speculators than the securities markets do.  Increased participation by speculators in the futures markets may also cause temporary price distortions.  Due to the possibility of price distortion, even a correct forecast of general market trends by Schroders may still not result in a successful hedging transaction over a very short time period.

7

Lack of Availability.  Because the markets for certain options and futures contracts and other derivative instruments in which a Fund may invest (including markets located in foreign countries) are relatively new and still developing and may be subject to regulatory restraints, a Fund’s ability to engage in transactions using such instruments may be limited.  Suitable derivative transactions may not be available in all circumstances and there is no assurance that a Fund will engage in such transactions at any time or from time to time.  A Fund’s ability to engage in hedging transactions may also be limited by certain regulatory and tax considerations.

Other Risks.  A Fund will incur brokerage fees in connection with its futures and options transactions.  In addition, while futures contracts and options on futures may be purchased and sold to reduce certain risks, those transactions themselves entail certain other risks.  Thus, while a Fund may benefit from the use of futures and related options, unanticipated changes in interest rates or stock price movements may result in a poorer overall performance for a Fund than if it had not entered into any futures contracts or options transactions.  Moreover, in the event of an imperfect correlation between the futures position and the portfolio position that is intended to be protected, the desired protection may not be obtained and the Fund may be exposed to risk of loss. A Fund may be required to segregate certain of its assets on the books of its custodian in respect of derivative transactions entered into by the Fund.  As open-end investment companies, registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the Trusts are subject to federal securities laws, including the Investment Company Act, related rules and various SEC and SEC Staff positions.  In accordance with these positions, with respect to certain kinds of derivatives, each Trust must “set aside” (referred to sometimes as “asset segregation”) liquid assets, or engage in other SEC- or Staff-approved measures while the derivatives contracts are open. For example, with respect to forwards and futures contracts that are not contractually required to “cash-settle,” a Trust must cover its open positions by setting aside liquid assets equal to the contracts’ full, notional value.  With respect to forwards and futures that are contractually required to “cash-settle,” however, a Trust is permitted to set aside liquid assets in an amount equal to a Trust’s daily marked-to-market (net) obligation ( i.e. , a Trust’s daily net liability, if any) rather than the notional value.  By setting aside assets equal to only its net obligation under cash-settled forward or futures a Trust will have the ability to employ leverage to a greater extent than if a Trust were required to segregate assets equal to the full notional value of such contracts.  The use of leverage involves certain risks.  Each Trust reserves the right to modify its asset segregation policies in the future to comply with any changes in the positions articulated from time to time by the SEC and its Staff.

The Funds are sponsored by Schroders who is registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”) as a “commodity pool operator” and “commodity trading adviser” under the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”).  However, the Funds have claimed an exclusion from the term “commodity pool” pursuant to Rule 4.5 under the CEA; therefore, neither a Fund nor Schroders (with respect to the Funds) is subject to registration or regulation as a “commodity pool operator” under the CEA.  To remain eligible for the exclusion under Rule 4.5 as it has recently been amended by the CFTC, a Fund will be limited in its ability to use futures and options on futures and engage in certain swaps transactions.  In the event that a Fund’s investments in certain derivative instruments regulated under the CEA (“commodity interests”), including futures, swaps and options on futures, exceed a certain threshold, Schroders may be required to register as a “commodity pool operator” and/or “commodity trading advisor” with the CFTC with respect to the Fund.  A Fund’s eligibility to claim the exclusion will be based upon the level and scope of its investment in commodity interests, the purposes of such investments and the manner in which the Fund holds out its use of commodity interests.  For example, Rule 4.5 requires a fund with respect to which the sponsor is claiming the exclusion to, among other things, satisfy one of the two following trading thresholds: (i) the aggregate initial margin and premiums required to establish positions in commodity interests cannot generally exceed 5% of the liquidation value of the fund’s portfolio, after taking into account unrealized profits and unrealized losses; or (ii) the aggregate net notional value of commodity interests not used solely for “bona fide hedging purposes,” determined at the time the most recent position was established, cannot generally exceed 100% of the liquidation value of the fund’s portfolio, after taking into account unrealized profits and unrealized losses on any such positions it has entered into.  In the event a Fund becomes unable to rely on the exclusion in Rule 4.5 and Schroders is required to register with the CFTC as a commodity pool operator with respect to a Fund, the Fund’s expenses may increase.  The CFTC’s recent amendments to the CEA, including Rule 4.5, have been challenged in court, and the outcome of this challenge is currently unknown.  The effect of the rule changes on the operations of a Fund and Schroders is not fully known at this time.

The CFTC and certain futures exchanges have established limits, referred to as “position limits,” on the maximum net long or net short positions which any person may hold or control in particular options and futures contracts; those position limits may in the future also apply to certain other derivatives positions the Funds may wish to take. All positions owned or controlled by the same person or entity, even if in different accounts, may in the future be aggregated for purposes of determining whether the applicable position limits have been exceeded. Thus, even if the Funds do not intend to exceed applicable position limits, it is possible that different clients managed by Schroders and its affiliates may be aggregated for this purpose. Therefore it is possible that in the future the trading decisions of Schroders may have to be modified and that positions held by the Funds may have to be liquidated in order to avoid exceeding such limits. The modification of investment decisions or the elimination of open positions, if it occurs, may adversely affect the performance of the Funds.

8

Foreign Investments. Foreign investments include securities principally traded in foreign markets, Eurodollar certificates of deposit, and other certificates of deposit issued by United States branches of foreign banks and foreign branches of United States banks.

Investments in foreign securities may involve risks and considerations different from or in addition to investments in domestic securities.  There may be less information publicly available about a foreign company than about a U.S. company, and foreign companies are not generally subject to accounting, auditing, and financial reporting standards and practices comparable to those in the United States. The securities of some foreign companies are less liquid and at times more volatile than securities of comparable U.S. companies. Foreign brokerage commissions and other fees are also generally higher than in the United States. Foreign settlement procedures and trade regulations may involve certain risks (such as delay in payment or delivery of securities or in the recovery of a Fund’s assets held abroad) and expenses not present in the settlement of domestic investments.  Also, because foreign securities are normally denominated and traded in foreign currencies, the values of a Fund’s assets may be affected favorably or unfavorably by currency exchange rates and exchange control regulations, and a Fund may incur costs in connection with conversion between currencies.

In addition, with respect to certain foreign countries, there is a possibility of nationalization or expropriation of assets, imposition of currency exchange controls, adoption of foreign governmental restrictions affecting the payment of principal and interest, imposition of withholding or confiscatory taxes, political or financial instability, and adverse political, diplomatic or economic developments, which could affect the values of investments in those countries.  Companies in some foreign countries may have material direct or indirect business relationships with governments that are considered state sponsors of terrorism by the U.S. government, or governments that otherwise have policies in conflict with the U.S. government.  Investments in such companies may subject a Fund to the risk that these companies’ reputation and price in the market will be adversely affected.  In certain countries, legal remedies available to investors may be more limited than those available with respect to investments in the United States or other countries and it may be more difficult to obtain and enforce a judgment against a foreign issuer.  Also, the laws of some foreign countries may limit a Fund’s ability to invest in securities of certain issuers located in those countries.

Special tax considerations apply to foreign securities.

Income received by a Fund from sources within foreign countries may be reduced by withholding and other taxes imposed by such countries.  Tax conventions between certain countries and the United States may reduce or eliminate such taxes.  It is impossible to determine the effective rate of foreign tax in advance since the amount of a Fund’s assets to be invested in various countries is not known, and tax laws and their interpretations may change from time to time and may change without advance notice.  Any such taxes paid by a Fund will reduce its net income available for distribution to shareholders.  In certain circumstances, a Fund may be able to elect to permit shareholders to claim a credit or deduction on their income tax returns with respect to foreign taxes paid by a Fund.

Emerging Market Securities.  Emerging market securities are securities of companies determined by Schroders to be “emerging market” issuers.  The risks of investing in foreign securities are particularly high when securities of issuers based in developing or emerging market countries are involved.  Investing in emerging market countries involves certain risks not typically associated with investing in U.S. securities, and imposes risks greater than, or in addition to, risks of investing in foreign, developed countries.  These risks include: greater risks of nationalization or expropriation of assets or confiscatory taxation; currency devaluations and other currency exchange rate fluctuations; greater social, economic and political uncertainty and instability (including the risk of war); more substantial government involvement in the economy; less government supervision and regulation of the securities markets and participants in those markets; controls on foreign investment and limitations on repatriation of invested capital and on a Fund’s ability to exchange local currencies for U.S. dollars; unavailability of currency hedging techniques in certain emerging market countries; the fact that companies in emerging market countries may be smaller, less seasoned and newly organized companies; the difference in, or lack of, auditing and financial reporting standards, which may result in unavailability of material information about issuers; the risk that it may be more difficult to obtain and/or enforce a judgment in a court outside the United States; and greater price volatility, substantially less liquidity, and significantly smaller market capitalization of securities markets.  Also, any change in the leadership or politics of emerging market countries, or the countries that exercise a significant influence over those countries, may halt the expansion of or reverse the liberalization of foreign investment policies now occurring and adversely affect existing investment opportunities.

In addition, a number of emerging market countries restrict, to various degrees, foreign investment in securities.  Furthermore, high rates of inflation and rapid fluctuations in inflation rates have had, and may continue to have, negative effects on the economies and securities markets of certain emerging market countries.

Sovereign Debt Obligations . Sovereign debt obligations are issued or guaranteed by foreign governments or their agencies. Sovereign debt may be in the form of conventional securities or other types of debt instruments such as loans or loan participations.

9

Governmental entities responsible for repayment of the debt may be unable or unwilling to repay principal and pay interest when due, and may require renegotiation or reschedule of debt payments. In addition, prospects for repayment of principal and payment of interest may depend on political as well as economic factors. Although some sovereign debt, such as Brady Bonds, is collateralized by U.S. Government securities, repayment of principal and payment of interest is not guaranteed by the U.S. Government.

Foreign Currency Transactions. A Fund may engage in currency exchange transactions to protect against uncertainty in the level of future foreign currency exchange rates and to increase current return. A Fund may engage in both “transaction hedging” and “position hedging.”

When a Fund engages in transaction hedging, it enters into foreign currency transactions with respect to specific receivables or payables of that Fund generally arising in connection with the purchase or sale of its portfolio securities.  A Fund will engage in transaction hedging when it desires to “lock in” the U.S. dollar price of a security it has agreed to purchase or sell, or the U.S. dollar equivalent of a dividend or interest payment in a foreign currency.  By transaction hedging, a Fund will attempt to protect against a possible loss resulting from an adverse change in the relationship between the U.S. dollar and the applicable foreign currency during the period between the date on which the security is purchased or sold or on which the dividend or interest payment is declared, and the date on which such payments are made or received.

A Fund may purchase or sell a foreign currency on a spot (or cash) basis at the prevailing spot rate in connection with transaction hedging.  A Fund may also enter into contracts to purchase or sell foreign currencies at a future date (“forward contracts”) and purchase and sell foreign currency futures contracts.

For transaction hedging purposes, a Fund may also purchase exchange-listed and over-the-counter call and put options on foreign currency futures contracts and on foreign currencies.  A put option on a futures contract gives a Fund the right to assume a short position in the futures contract until expiration of the option.  A put option on currency gives a Fund the right to sell a currency at an exercise price until the expiration of the option.  A call option on a futures contract gives a Fund the right to assume a long position in the futures contract until the expiration of the option.  A call option on currency gives a Fund the right to purchase a currency at the exercise price until the expiration of the option.  When it engages in position hedging, a Fund enters into foreign currency exchange transactions to protect against a decline in the values of the foreign currencies in which securities held by a Fund are denominated or are quoted in their principal trading markets or an increase in the value of currency for securities which a Fund expects to purchase.  In connection with position hedging, a Fund may purchase put or call options on foreign currency and foreign currency futures contracts and buy or sell forward contracts and foreign currency futures contracts.  A Fund may also purchase or sell foreign currency on a spot basis.

The precise matching of the amounts of foreign currency exchange transactions and the value of the portfolio securities involved will not generally be possible since the future value of such securities in foreign currencies will change as a consequence of market movements in the values of those securities between the dates the currency exchange transactions are entered into and the dates they mature.

It is impossible to forecast with precision the market value of a Fund’s portfolio securities at the expiration or maturity of a forward or futures contract.  Accordingly, it may be necessary for a Fund to purchase additional foreign currency on the spot market (and bear the expense of such purchase) if the market value of the security or securities being hedged is less than the amount of foreign currency the Fund is obligated to deliver and if a decision is made to sell the security or securities and make delivery of the foreign currency.  Conversely, it may be necessary to sell on the spot market some of the foreign currency received upon the sale of the portfolio security or securities of a Fund if the market value of such security or securities exceeds the amount of foreign currency the Fund is obligated to deliver.

To offset some of the costs to a Fund of hedging against fluctuations in currency exchange rates, a Fund may write covered call options on those currencies.

Transaction and position hedging do not eliminate fluctuations in the underlying prices of the securities that a Fund owns or intends to purchase or sell.  They simply establish a rate of exchange that one can achieve at some future point in time.  Additionally, although these techniques tend to minimize the risk of loss due to a decline in the value of the hedged currency, they tend to limit any potential gain that might result from the increase in the value of such currency.  Also, suitable foreign currency hedging transactions may not be available in all circumstances and there can be no assurance that a Fund will utilize hedging transactions at any time or from time to time.

10

A Fund may also seek to increase its current return by purchasing and selling foreign currency on a spot basis, and by purchasing and selling options on foreign currencies and on foreign currency futures contracts, and by purchasing and selling foreign currency forward contracts.

Special tax considerations apply to transactions in debt securities denominated in foreign currencies, foreign currency forward contracts (see below) and certain other foreign currency positions, which may affect the timing, amount and character of distributions to shareholders.

Currency Forward and Futures Contracts.  A forward foreign currency exchange contract involves an obligation to purchase or sell a specific currency at a future date, which may be any fixed number of days from the date of the contract as agreed by the parties, at a price set at the time of the contract.  In the case of a cancelable forward contract, the holder has the unilateral right to cancel the contract at maturity by paying a specified fee.  The contracts are traded in the interbank market conducted directly between currency traders (usually large commercial banks) and their customers.  A forward contract generally has no deposit requirement, and no commissions are charged at any stage for trades.  A foreign currency futures contract is a standardized contract for the future delivery of a specified amount of a foreign currency at a future date at a price set at the time of the contract.  Foreign currency futures contracts traded in the United States are designed by and traded on exchanges regulated by the CFTC, such as the New York Mercantile Exchange.

Forward foreign currency exchange contracts differ from foreign currency futures contracts in certain respects.  For example, the maturity date of a forward contract may be any fixed number of days from the date of the contract agreed upon by the parties, rather than a predetermined date in a given month.  Forward contracts may be in any amounts agreed upon by the parties rather than predetermined amounts.  Also, forward foreign exchange contracts are traded directly between currency traders so that no intermediary is required.  A forward contract generally requires no margin or other deposit.

At the maturity of a forward or futures contract, the Fund may either accept or make delivery of the currency specified in the contract, or at or prior to maturity enter into a closing transaction involving the purchase or sale of an offsetting contract.  Closing transactions with respect to forward contracts are usually effected with the currency trader who is a party to the original forward contract.  Closing transactions with respect to futures contracts are effected on a commodities exchange; a clearing corporation associated with the exchange assumes responsibility for closing out such contracts.

Positions in foreign currency futures contracts and related options may be closed out only on an exchange or board of trade that provides a secondary market in such contracts or options.  Although the Fund will normally purchase or sell foreign currency futures contracts and related options only on exchanges or boards of trade where there appears to be an active secondary market, there is no assurance that a secondary market on an exchange or board of trade will exist for any particular contract or option or at any particular time.  In such event, it may not be possible to close a futures or related option position and, in the event of adverse price movements, a Fund would continue to be required to make daily cash payments of variation margin on its futures positions.

Foreign Currency Options.  Options on foreign currencies operate similarly to options on securities, and are traded primarily in the over-the-counter market, although options on foreign currencies have been listed on several exchanges.  Such options will be purchased or written only when Schroders believes that a liquid secondary market exists for such options.  There can be no assurance that a liquid secondary market will exist for a particular option at any specific time.  Options on foreign currencies are affected by all of those factors that influence exchange rates and investments generally.

The value of a foreign currency option is dependent upon the value of the foreign currency and the U.S. dollar, and may have no relationship to the investment merits of a foreign security.  Because foreign currency transactions occurring in the interbank market involve substantially larger amounts than those that may be involved in the use of foreign currency options, investors may be disadvantaged by having to deal in an odd lot market (generally consisting of transactions of less than $1 million) for the underlying foreign currencies at prices that are less favorable than for round lots.

There is no systematic reporting of last sale information for foreign currencies and there is no regulatory requirement that quotations available through dealers or other market sources be firm or revised on a timely basis.  Available quotation information is generally representative of very large transactions in the interbank market and thus may not reflect relatively smaller transactions (less than $1 million) where rates may be less favorable.  The interbank market in foreign currencies is a global, around-the-clock market.  To the extent that the U.S. options markets are closed while the markets for the underlying currencies remain open, significant price and rate movements may take place in the underlying markets that cannot be reflected in the U.S. options markets.

Foreign Currency Conversion.   Although foreign exchange dealers do not charge a fee for currency conversion, they do realize a profit based on the difference (the “spread”) between prices at which they buy and sell various currencies.  Thus, a dealer

11

may offer to sell a foreign currency to a Fund at one rate, while offering a lesser rate of exchange should a Fund desire to resell that currency to the dealer.

Convertible Securities.   Convertible securities include bonds, debentures, notes, preferred stocks and other securities that may be converted into or exchanged for, at a specific price or formula within a particular period of time, a prescribed amount of common stock or other equity securities of the same or a different issuer. Convertible securities entitle the holder to receive interest paid or accrued on debt or dividends paid or accrued on preferred stock until the security matures or is redeemed, converted or exchanged.  Convertible securities provide for streams of income with yields that are generally higher than those of common stocks.

The market value of a convertible security is a function of its “investment value” and its “conversion value.” A security’s “investment value” represents the value of the security without its conversion feature ( i.e. , a nonconvertible fixed income security). The investment value may be determined by reference to its credit quality and the current value of its yield to maturity or probable call date. At any given time, investment value is dependent upon such factors as the general level of interest rates, the yield of similar nonconvertible securities, the financial strength of the issuer and the seniority of the security in the issuer’s capital structure. A security’s “conversion value” is determined by multiplying the number of shares the holder is entitled to receive upon conversion or exchange by the current price of the underlying security.

If the conversion value of a convertible security is significantly below its investment value, the convertible security will trade like nonconvertible debt or preferred stock and its market value will not be influenced greatly by fluctuations in the market price of the underlying security. Conversely, if the conversion value of a convertible security is near or above its investment value, the market value of the convertible security will be more heavily influenced by fluctuations in the market price of the underlying security.

Convertible securities may at times include securities that have a mandatory conversion feature, pursuant to which the securities convert automatically into common stock or other equity securities at a specified date and a specified conversion ratio, or that are convertible at the option of the issuer. Because conversion of the security is not at the option of the holder, the holder may be required to convert the security into the underlying common stock even at times when the value of the underlying common stock or other equity security has declined substantially.

Investments in convertible securities, particularly securities that are convertible into securities of an issuer other than the issuer of the convertible security, may be illiquid. A Fund may not be able to dispose of such securities in a timely fashion or for a fair price, which could result in losses to that Fund.

Warrants to Purchase Securities.  Bonds issued with warrants attached to purchase equity securities have many characteristics of convertible bonds and their prices may, to some degree, reflect the performance of the underlying stock.  Bonds also may be issued with warrants attached to purchase additional fixed income securities at the same coupon rate.  A decline in interest rates would permit a Fund to buy additional bonds at the favorable rate or to sell the warrants at a profit.  If interest rates rise, the warrants would generally expire with no value.

Equity-linked warrants are purchased from a broker, who in turn is expected to purchase shares in the local market and issue a call warrant hedged on the underlying holding.  If the Fund exercises its call and closes its position, the shares are expected to be sold and the warrant redeemed with the proceeds.  Each warrant represents one share of the underlying stock.  Therefore, the price, performance and liquidity of the warrant are all directly linked to the underlying stock, less transaction costs.  Equity-linked warrants are valued at the closing price of the underlying security, then adjusted for stock dividends declared by the underlying security. In addition to the market risk related to the underlying holdings, a Fund bears additional counterparty risk with respect to the issuing broker.  Moreover, there is currently no active trading market for equity-linked warrants.

Index-linked warrants are put warrants and call warrants whose values vary depending on the change in the value of one or more specified securities indices.  Index-linked warrants are generally issued by banks or other financial institutions and give the holder the right, at any time during the term of the warrant, to receive upon exercise of the warrant a cash payment from the issuer based on the value of the underlying index at the time of exercise. In general, if the value of the underlying index rises above the exercise price of the index-linked warrant, the holder of a call warrant will be entitled to receive a cash payment from the issuer upon exercise based on the difference between the value of the index and the exercise price of the warrant; if the value of the underlying index falls, the holder of a put warrant will be entitled to receive a cash payment from the issuer upon exercise based on the difference between the exercise price of the warrant and the value of the index. The holder of a warrant would not be entitled to any payments from the issuer at any time when, in the case of a call warrant, the exercise price is greater than the value of the underlying index, or, in the case of a put warrant, the exercise price is less than the value of the underlying index. If a Fund were not to exercise an index-linked warrant prior to its expiration, then the Fund would lose the amount of the purchase price paid by it for the warrant.

12

The risks of using index-linked warrants are generally similar to those relating to its use of index options. Unlike most index options, however, index-linked warrants are issued in limited amounts and are not obligations of a regulated clearing agency, but are backed only by the credit of the bank or other institution that issues the warrant. Also, index-linked warrants generally have longer terms than index options. Index-linked warrants are not likely to be as liquid as certain index options backed by a recognized clearing agency. In addition, the terms of index-linked warrants may limit the holder’s ability to exercise the warrants at such time, or in such quantities, as it would otherwise wish to do.

Synthetic warrants are proprietary instruments, issued by financial institutions. The price, performance and liquidity of such warrants will generally fluctuate more than those of the underlying securities because of the greater volatility of the warrants market. In addition as the issuer of a synthetic warrant is different from that of the underlying security, it is subject to the additional risk that the issuer of the synthetic warrant will be unwilling or unable to perform its obligations under the transactions which may result in a loss to the investor.

Real Estate Investment Trusts.  Real estate investment trusts (“REITs”) include equity REITs and mortgage REITs. Equity REITs invest directly in real property while mortgage REITs invest in mortgages on real property. REITs may be subject to certain risks associated with the direct ownership of real estate, including declines in the value of real estate, risks related to general and local economic conditions, overbuilding and increased competition, increases in property taxes and operating expenses, and variations in rental income. Generally, increases in interest rates will decrease the value of high yielding securities and increase the costs of obtaining financing, which could decrease the value of a REIT’s investments. In addition, equity REITs may be affected by changes in the value of the underlying property owned by the REITs, while mortgage REITs may be affected by the quality of credit extended. Equity and mortgage REITs are dependent upon management skill, are not diversified and are subject to the risks of financing projects. REITs are also subject to heavy cash flow dependency, defaults by borrowers, self liquidation and the possibility of failing to qualify for tax-free pass-through of income under the Code, and to maintain exemption from registration under the 1940 Act.

Investments in Pooled Vehicles.  Investing in another pooled vehicle exposes the Fund to all the risks of that pooled vehicle, and, in general, subjects it to a pro rata portion of the other pooled vehicle’s fees and expenses.  Exchange-traded funds (“ETFs”) are hybrid investment companies that are registered as open-end investment companies or unit investment trusts (“UITs”) but possess some of the characteristics of closed-end funds. ETFs typically hold a portfolio of securities that is intended to track the price and dividend performance of a particular index. Common examples of ETFs include S&P Depositary Receipts (“SPDRs”) and iShares, which may be purchased from the UIT or investment company issuing the securities or purchased in the secondary market. SPDRs are listed on the American Stock Exchange and iShares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange. iShares® is a registered trademark of Barclays Global Investors, N.A. (“BGI”). Neither BGI nor the iShares® Funds make any representation regarding the advisability of investing in the Fund.) The market price for ETF shares may be higher or lower than the ETF’s net asset value. The sale and redemption prices of ETF shares purchased from the issuer are based on the issuer’s net asset value.

Depositary Receipts.  These may include American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”), Global Depositary Receipts (“GDRs”), European Depositary Receipts (“EDRs”) or other similar securities representing ownership of foreign securities (collectively, “Depositary Receipts”).  Depositary Receipts generally evidence an ownership interest in a corresponding foreign security on deposit with a financial institution.  Transactions in Depositary Receipts usually do not settle in the same currency in which the underlying securities are denominated or traded.  Generally, ADRs, in registered form, are designed for use in the U.S. securities markets and EDRs, in bearer form, are designed for use in European securities markets.  GDRs may be traded in any public or private securities markets and may represent securities held by institutions located anywhere in the world.

Investments in non-U.S. issuers through Depositary Receipts and similar instruments may involve certain risks not applicable to investing in U.S. issuers, including changes in currency rates, application of local tax laws, changes in governmental administration or economic or monetary policy or changed circumstances in dealings between nations.  Costs may be incurred in connection with conversions between various currencies.  A Fund may enter into forward currency contracts and purchase currencies on a spot basis to reduce currency risk; however, currency hedging involves costs and may not be effective in all cases.

Swap Agreements.  Depending on their structures, swap agreements may increase or decrease a Fund’s exposure to long-or short-term interest rates (in the United States or abroad), foreign currency values, mortgage securities, corporate borrowing rates, or other factors such as security prices or inflation rates. The value of a Fund’s swap positions would increase or decrease depending on the changes in value of the underlying rates, currency values, or other indices or measures.

In a “credit default” swap transaction, one party pays what is, in effect, an insurance premium through a stream of payments to another party in exchange for the right to receive a specified return in an event of default (or similar events) by a third party on its obligations.  Therefore, in a credit default swap, a Fund may pay a premium and, in return, have the right to put certain bonds or loans to the counterparty upon default by the issuer of such bonds or loans (or similar events) and to receive in return the par value of such

13

bonds or loans (or another agreed upon amount). A Fund could also receive the premium referenced above, and be obligated to pay a counterparty the par value of certain bonds or loans upon a default (or similar event) by the issuer. A Fund’s ability to realize a profit from such transactions will depend on the ability of the financial institutions with which it enters into the transactions to meet their obligations to the Fund. Under certain circumstances, suitable transactions may not be available to a Fund, or a Fund may be unable to close out its position under such transactions at the same time, or at the same price, as if it had purchased comparable publicly traded securities. A Fund’s ability to engage in certain swap transactions may be limited by tax considerations.

Recent legislative and regulatory reforms, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, are expected to result in new regulation of swap agreements, including clearing, margin, reporting, recordkeeping and registration requirements. New regulations could, among other things, restrict a Fund’s ability to engage in swap transactions (for example, by making certain types of swap transactions no longer available to a Fund) and/or increase the costs of such swap transactions (for example, by increasing margin or capital requirements), and a Fund may as a result be unable to execute its investment strategies in a manner Schroders might otherwise choose. It is also unclear how the regulatory changes will affect counterparty risk.

Hybrid Instruments. These instruments are generally considered derivatives and include indexed or structured securities, and combine the elements of futures contracts or options with those of debt, preferred equity or a depositary instrument. A hybrid instrument may be a debt security, preferred stock, warrant, convertible security, certificate of depositor other evidence of indebtedness on which a portion of or all interest payments, and/or the principal or stated amount payable at maturity, redemption or retirement, is determined by reference to prices, changes in prices, or differences between prices, of securities, currencies, intangibles, goods, articles or commodities (collectively, “underlying assets”), or by another objective index, economic factor or other measure, including interest rates, currency exchange rates, or commodities or securities indices (collectively, “benchmarks”). Hybrid instruments may take a number of forms, including, but not limited to, debt instruments with interest or principal payments or redemption terms determined by reference to the value of an index at a future time, preferred stock with dividend rates determined by reference to the value of a currency, or convertible securities with the conversion terms related to a particular commodity.

The risks of investing in hybrid instruments reflect a combination of the risks of investing in securities, options, futures and currencies. An investment in a hybrid instrument may entail significant risks that are not associated with a similar investment in a traditional debt instrument that has a fixed principal amount, is denominated in U.S. dollars or bears interest either at a fixed rate or a floating rate determined by reference to a common, nationally published benchmark. The risks of a particular hybrid instrument will depend upon the terms of the instrument, but may include the possibility of significant changes in the benchmark(s) or the prices of the underlying assets to which the instrument is linked. Such risks generally depend upon factors unrelated to the operations or credit quality of the issuer of the hybrid instrument, which may not be foreseen by the purchaser, such as economic and political events, the supply and demand of the underlying assets and interest rate movements. Hybrid instruments may be highly volatile and their use by a Fund may not be successful.

Hybrid instruments may bear interest or pay preferred dividends at below market (or even relatively nominal) rates. Alternatively, hybrid instruments may bear interest at above market rates but bear an increased risk of principal loss (or gain). The latter scenario may result if “leverage” is used to structure the hybrid instrument. Leverage risk occurs when the hybrid instrument is structured so that a given change in a benchmark or underlying asset is multiplied to produce a greater value change in the hybrid instrument, thereby magnifying the risk of loss as well as the potential for gain.

Hybrid instruments can be an efficient means of creating exposure to a particular market, or segment of a market, with the objective of enhancing total return. For example, a Fund may wish to take advantage of expected declines in interest rates in several European countries, but avoid the transaction costs associated with buying and currency-hedging the foreign bond positions. One solution would be to purchase a U.S. dollar-denominated hybrid instrument whose redemption price is linked to the average three year interest rate in a designated group of countries. The redemption price formula would provide for payoffs of less than par if rates were above the specified level. Furthermore, a Fund could limit the downside risk of the security by establishing a minimum redemption price so that the principal paid at maturity could not be below a predetermined minimum level if interest rates were to rise significantly. The purpose of this arrangement, known as a structured security with an embedded put option, would be to give a Fund the desired European bond exposure while avoiding currency risk, limiting downside market risk, and lowering transaction costs. Of course, there is no guarantee that the strategy will be successful and a Fund could lose money if, for example, interest rates do not move as anticipated or credit problems develop with the issuer of the hybrid instrument.

Hybrid instruments are potentially more volatile and carry greater market risks than traditional debt instruments. Depending on the structure of the particular hybrid instrument, changes in a benchmark may be magnified by the terms of the hybrid instrument and have an even more dramatic and substantial effect upon the value of the hybrid instrument. Also, the prices of the hybrid instrument and the benchmark or underlying asset may not move in the same direction or at the same time.

14

Hybrid instruments may also carry liquidity risk since the instruments are often “customized” to meet the portfolio needs of a particular investor, and therefore, the number of investors that are willing and able to buy such instruments in the secondary market may be smaller than that for more traditional debt securities. Under certain conditions, the redemption value of such an investment could be zero. In addition, because the purchase and sale of hybrid investments would likely take place in an over-the-counter market without the guarantee of a central clearing organization, or in a transaction between a Fund and the issuer of the hybrid instrument, the creditworthiness of the counterparty of the issuer of the hybrid instrument would be an additional risk factor the Fund would have to consider and monitor. Hybrid instruments also may not be subject to regulation by the CFTC, which generally regulates the trading of commodity futures by U.S. persons, the SEC, which regulates the offer and sale of securities by and to U.S. persons, or any other governmental regulatory authority.

Structured Investments.   A structured investment is a security having a return tied to an underlying index or other security or asset class. Structured investments generally are individually negotiated agreements and may be traded over-the-counter. Structured investments are organized and operated to restructure the investment characteristics of the underlying security. This restructuring involves the deposit with or purchase by an entity, such as a corporation or trust, or specified instruments (such as commercial bank loans) and the issuance by that entity or one or more classes of securities (“structured securities”) backed by, or representing interests in, the underlying instruments. The cash flow on the underlying instruments may be apportioned among the newly issued structured securities to create securities with different investment characteristics, such as varying maturities, payment priorities and interest rate provisions, and the extent of such payments made with respect to structured securities is dependent on the extent of the cash flow on the underlying instruments. Because structured securities typically involve no credit enhancement, their credit risk generally will be equivalent to that of the underlying instruments. Investments in structured securities are generally of a class of structured securities that is either subordinated or unsubordinated to the right of payment of another class. Subordinated structured securities typically have higher yields and present greater risks than unsubordinated structured securities. Structured securities are typically sold in private placement transactions, and there currently is no active trading market for structured securities. Investments in government and government-related and restructured debt instruments are subject to special risks, including the inability or unwillingness to repay principal and interest, requests to reschedule or restructure outstanding debt and requests to extend additional loan amounts.

Equity-Linked Notes . An equity-linked note is a note, typically issued by a company or financial institution, whose performance is tied to a single stock, a basket of stocks or a stock index. Generally, upon the maturity of the note, the holder receives a return of principal based on the capital appreciation of the underlying linked securities. The terms of an equity-linked note may also provide for the periodic interest payments to holders at either a fixed or floating rate.

There are risks associated with investment in equity-linked notes. The return on a note is based on the performance of a designated stock, a basket of stocks or an equity index, and in a period of underperformance, the Fund may lose some or all of its investment in the note. The maximum return on a note may be limited to a specified amount, so even if the investment manager’s view of the underlying stock(s) or index is correct, the gain may be limited. There is no guarantee that a specific, or any, return or yield on an investment will be made. There is also the possibility that a note issuer may default on its obligations under the note.

Private Placements and Restricted Securities.   Because there may be relatively few potential purchasers for such investments, especially under adverse market or economic conditions or in the event of adverse changes in the financial condition of the issuer, a Fund could find it more difficult to sell such securities when Schroders believes it advisable to do so or may be able to sell such securities only at prices lower than if such securities were more widely held. At times, it may also be more difficult to determine the fair value of such securities for purposes of computing a Fund’s net asset value.

The absence of a trading market can make it difficult to ascertain a market value for illiquid investments. Disposing of illiquid investments may involve time-consuming negotiation and legal expenses, and it may be difficult or impossible for a Fund to sell them promptly at an acceptable price.

While private placements may often offer attractive opportunities for investment not otherwise available on the open market, the securities so purchased are often “restricted securities,” i.e., securities that cannot be sold to the public without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”) or the availability of an exemption from registration (such as Rules 144 or 144A), or that are “not readily marketable” because they are subject to other legal or contractual delays in or restrictions on resale.  Generally speaking, restricted securities may be sold only to qualified institutional buyers, or in a privately negotiated transaction to a limited number of purchasers, or in limited quantities after they have been held for a specified period of time and other conditions are met pursuant to an exemption from registration, or in a public offering for which a registration statement is in effect under the 1933 Act. A Fund may be deemed to be an “underwriter” for purposes of the 1933 Act when selling restricted securities to the public, and in such event a Fund may be liable to purchasers of such securities if the registration statement prepared by the issuer, or the prospectus forming a part of it, is materially inaccurate or misleading. A Fund may have to bear the extra expense of registering such securities

15

for resale and the risk of substantial delay in effecting such registration. If no qualified institutional buyers are interested in purchasing the securities, then a Fund may not be able to sell such securities.

Illiquid Securities. Illiquid securities may be highly volatile, difficult to value, and difficult to sell or close out at favorable prices or times. Investments in foreign securities, including emerging market securities, tend to have greater exposure to liquidity risk.

Inverse Floaters.  Inverse floaters have variable interest rates that typically move in the opposite direction from movements in prevailing short-term interest rate levels—rising when prevailing short-term interest rate fall, and vice versa.  The prices of inverse floaters can be highly volatile and some inverse floaters may be “leveraged,” resulting in increased risk and potential volatility.  A Fund may use inverse floaters for hedging or investment purposes.  Use of inverse floaters other than for hedging purposes may be considered speculative.

Over-the-Counter Securities.   Over-the-counter securities are not traded on a recognized securities exchange. They may be more difficult to sell under some market conditions than securities traded on exchanges.  As described below under “Determination of Net Asset Value,” unlisted securities for which market quotations are readily available generally are valued at the most recently reported sale prices on any day or, in the absence of a reported sale price, at mid-market prices.  Market quotations may not be readily available for all over-the-counter securities.  If a Fund is not able to sell such securities at a price at which such Fund has valued the securities for purposes of calculating its net asset value, such Fund’s net asset value will decrease.

When-Issued Securities.    Debt securities are often issued on a “when-issued” basis. The price of such securities, which may be expressed in yield terms, is fixed at the time a commitment to purchase is made, but delivery and payment for the when-issued securities take place at a later date. Normally, the settlement date occurs within one month of the purchase. During the period between purchase and settlement, no payment is made by a Fund and no interest accrues to a Fund. To the extent that assets of a Fund are held in cash pending the settlement of a purchase of securities, that Fund would earn no income. While a Fund may sell its right to acquire when-issued securities prior to the settlement date, a Fund may intend actually to acquire such securities unless a sale prior to settlement appears desirable for investment reasons. At the time a Fund makes the commitment to purchase a security on a when-issued basis, it will record the transaction and reflect the amount due and the value of the security in determining the Fund’s net asset value. The market value of the when-issued securities may be more or less than the purchase price payable at the settlement date. Each Fund will establish a segregated account in which it will maintain cash and U.S. Government securities or other liquid securities at least equal in value to commitments for when-issued securities. Such segregated securities either will mature or, if necessary, be sold on or before the settlement date.

Zero-Coupon Securities. Zero-coupon securities are debt obligations that are generally issued at a discount and payable in full at maturity, and that do not provide for current payments of interest prior to maturity.  Zero-coupon securities usually trade at a deep discount from their face or par value and are subject to greater market value fluctuations from changing interest rates than debt obligations of comparable maturities that make current distributions of interest. As a result, the net asset value of shares of a Fund investing in zero-coupon securities may fluctuate over a greater range than shares of other Funds of the Trust and other mutual funds investing in securities making current distributions of interest and having similar maturities. A Fund is required to accrue income on these securities, even though the Fund is not receiving the income in cash on a current basis. Thus, a Fund may have to sell investments, including when it may not be advisable to do so, to make required income distributions under U.S. federal income tax laws.

Zero-coupon securities may include U.S. Treasury bills issued directly by the U.S. Treasury or other short-term debt obligations, and longer-term bonds or notes and their unmatured interest coupons that have been separated by their holder, typically a custodian bank or investment brokerage firm. A number of securities firms and banks have stripped the interest coupons from the underlying principal (the “corpus”) of U.S. Treasury securities and resold them in custodial receipt programs with a number of different names, including Treasury Income Growth Receipts (“TIGRS”) and Certificates of Accrual on Treasuries (“CATS”). CATS and TIGRS are not considered U.S. Government securities. The underlying U.S. Treasury bonds and notes themselves are held in book-entry form at the Federal Reserve Bank or, in the case of bearer securities ( i.e. , unregistered securities that are owned ostensibly by the bearer or holder thereof), in trust on behalf of the owners thereof.

In addition, the U.S. Treasury has facilitated transfers of ownership of zero-coupon securities by accounting separately for the beneficial ownership of particular interest coupons and corpus payments on U.S. Treasury securities through the Federal Reserve book-entry record-keeping system. The Federal Reserve program as established by the U.S. Treasury Department is known as “STRIPS” or “Separate Trading of Registered Interest and Principal of Securities.” Under the STRIPS program, a Fund will be able to have its beneficial ownership of U.S. Treasury zero-coupon securities recorded directly in the book-entry record-keeping system in lieu of having to hold certificates or other evidences of ownership of the underlying U.S. Treasury securities.

16

When debt obligations have been stripped of their unmatured interest coupons by the holder, the stripped coupons are sold separately. The principal or corpus is sold at a deep discount because the buyer receives only the right to receive a future fixed payment on the security and does not receive any rights to periodic cash interest payments. Once stripped or separated, the corpus and coupons may be sold separately. Typically, the coupons are sold separately or grouped with other coupons with like maturity dates and sold in such bundled form. Purchasers of stripped obligations acquire, in effect, discount obligations that are economically identical to the zero-coupon securities issued directly by the obligor.

Fixed Income Securities.   In periods of declining interest rates, the yield (income from portfolio investments) of a Fund may tend to be higher than prevailing market rates, and in periods of rising interest rates, the yield of a Fund may tend to be lower. In addition, when interest rates are falling, the inflow of net new money to a Fund will likely be invested in portfolio instruments producing lower yields than the balance of the Fund’s portfolio, thereby reducing the yield of the Fund. In periods of rising interest rates, the opposite can be true. The net asset value of a Fund can generally be expected to change as general levels of interest rates fluctuate. The values of fixed income securities in a Fund’s portfolio generally vary inversely with changes in interest rates. Prices of fixed income securities with longer effective maturities are more sensitive to interest rate changes than those with shorter effective maturities.  A Fund may purchase fixed income securities issued by companies of any market capitalization, including small and micro cap companies. Such investments may involve greater risk than is usually associated with larger, more established companies.

U.S. Government Securities. A Fun d may invest in U.S. Government securities. Securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or its agencies or instrumentalities include U.S. Treasury securities, which are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Treasury and which differ only in their interest rates, maturities, and times of issuance. U.S. Treasury bills have initial maturities of one year or less; U.S. Treasury notes have initial maturities of one to ten years; and U.S. Treasury bonds generally have initial maturities of greater than ten years.  Certain U.S.  Government securities are issued or guaranteed by agencies or instrumentalities of the U.S. Government including, but not limited to, obligations of U.S. Government agencies or instrumentalities such as Fannie Mae, the Government National Mortgage Association (“Ginnie Mae”), the Small Business Administration, the Federal Farm Credit Administration, the Federal Home Loan Banks, Banks for Cooperatives (including the Central Bank for Cooperatives), the Federal Land Banks, the Federal Intermediate Credit Banks, the Tennessee Valley Authority, the Export-Import Bank of the United States, the Commodity Credit Corporation, the Federal Financing Bank, the Student Loan Marketing Association, the National Credit Union Administration and the Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (Farmer Mac).

Some obligations issued or guaranteed by U.S. Government agencies and instrumentalities, including, for example, Ginnie Mae pass-through certificates, are supported by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Treasury. Other obligations issued by or guaranteed by federal agencies, such as those securities issued by Fannie Mae, are supported by the discretionary authority of the U.S. Government to purchase certain obligations of the federal agency, while other obligations issued by or guaranteed by federal agencies, such as those of the Federal Home Loan Banks, are supported by the right of the issuer to borrow from the U.S. Treasury, while the U.S. Government provides financial support to such U.S. Government-sponsored federal agencies, no assurance can be given that the U.S. Government will always do so, since the U.S. Government is not so obligated by law. U.S. Treasury notes and bonds typically pay coupon interest semi-annually and repay the principal at maturity.

On September 7, 2008, the U.S. Treasury announced a federal takeover of Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac, placing the two federal instrumentalities in conservatorship. Under the takeover, the U.S. Treasury agreed to acquire $1 billion of senior preferred stock of each instrumentality and obtained warrants for the purchase of common stock of each instrumentality (the “Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement” or “Agreement”). Under the Agreement, the U.S. Treasury pledged to provide up to $200 billion per instrumentality as needed, including the contribution of cash capital to the instrumentalities in the event their liabilities exceed their assets. This was intended to ensure that the instrumentalities maintain a positive net worth and meet their financial obligations, preventing mandatory triggering of receivership. On December 24, 2009, the U.S. Treasury announced that it was amending the Agreement to allow the $200 billion cap on the U.S. Treasury’s funding commitment to increase as necessary to accommodate any cumulative reduction in net worth over the next three years. As a result of this Agreement, the investments of holders, including the Funds, of mortgage- backed securities and other obligations issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are protected through 2012.

While the U.S. Treasury is committed to offset negative equity at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac through its preferred stock purchases through 2012, no assurance can be given that the initiatives discussed above will ensure that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will remain successful in meeting their obligations with respect to the debt and mortgage-backed securities they issue beyond that date. In addition, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are also the subject of several continuing class action lawsuits and investigations by federal regulators over certain accounting, disclosure or corporate governance matters, which (along with any resulting financial restatements) may adversely affect the guaranteeing entities. Importantly, the future of the entities is in serious question as the U.S. Government reportedly is considering multiple options, ranging from nationalization, privatization, consolidation, or abolishment of the entities.

17

Corporate Bonds. Corporations issue bonds and notes to raise money for working capital or for capital expenditures such as plant construction, equipment purchases and expansion. In return for the money loaned to the corporation by investors, the corporation promises to pay investors interest, and repay the principal amount of the bond or note.

Lower-Rated Securities, Unrated Securities, and Securities in Default. A Fund may invest up in lower-rated fixed-income securities (commonly known as “junk bonds”).  A Fund may invest in securities that are in default, and which offer little or no prospect for the payment of the full amount of unpaid principal and interest, although normally, a Fund will not invest in securities unless a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (for example, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”), Standard & Poor’s Rating Service (“Standard & Poor’s”), or Fitch Investors Service, Inc. (“Fitch”)) has rated the securities CC- (or the equivalent) or better, or the Fund’s adviser has determined the securities to be of comparable quality. The lower ratings of certain securities held by a Fund reflect a greater possibility that adverse changes in the financial condition of the issuer or in general economic conditions, or both, or an unanticipated rise in interest rates, may impair the ability of the issuer to make payments of interest and principal.  The inability (or perceived inability) of issuers to make timely payment of interest and principal would likely make the values of securities held by a Fund more volatile and could limit the Fund’s ability to sell its securities at prices approximating the values the Fund had placed on such securities.  In the absence of a liquid trading market for securities held by it, a Fund at times may be unable to establish the fair value of such securities.

Securities ratings are based largely on the issuer’s historical financial condition and the rating agencies’ analysis at the time of rating.  Consequently, the rating assigned to any particular security is not necessarily a reflection of the issuer’s current financial condition, which may be better or worse than the rating would indicate.  In addition, the rating assigned to a security by Moody’s or Standard & Poor’s (or by any other nationally recognized securities rating agency) does not reflect an assessment of the volatility of the security’s market value or the liquidity of an investment in the security.

Like those of other fixed-income securities, the values of lower-rated securities fluctuate in response to changes in interest rates.  A decrease in interest rates will generally result in an increase in the value of a Fund’s assets.  Conversely, during periods of rising interest rates, the value of a Fund’s assets will generally decline. The values of lower-rated securities may often be affected to a greater extent by changes in general economic conditions and business conditions affecting the issuers of such securities and their industries.  Negative publicity or investor perceptions may also adversely affect the values of lower-rated securities.  Changes by nationally recognized securities rating agencies in their ratings of any fixed-income security and changes in the ability of an issuer to make payments of interest and principal may also affect the value of these investments.  Changes in the value of portfolio securities generally will not affect income derived from these securities, but will affect a Fund’s net asset value.  A Fund will not necessarily dispose of a security when its rating is reduced below its rating at the time of purchase.

Issuers of lower-rated securities are often highly leveraged, so that their ability to service their debt obligations during an economic downturn or during sustained periods of rising interest rates may be impaired.  Such issuers may not have more traditional methods of financing available to them and may be unable to repay outstanding obligations at maturity by refinancing.  The risk of loss due to default in payment of interest or repayment of principal by such issuers is significantly greater because such securities frequently are unsecured and subordinated to the prior payment of senior indebtedness.

At times, a portion of a Fund’s assets may be invested in an issue of which the Fund, by itself or together with other funds and accounts managed by Schroders or its affiliates, holds all or a major portion.  Although Schroders generally considers such securities to be liquid because of the availability of an institutional market for such securities, it is possible that, under adverse market or economic conditions or in the event of adverse changes in the financial condition of the issuer, the Fund could find it more difficult to sell these securities when Schroders believes it advisable to do so or may be able to sell the securities only at prices lower than if they were more widely held.  Under these circumstances, it may also be more difficult to determine the fair value of such securities for purposes of computing the Fund’s net asset value.  In order to enforce its rights in the event of a default, a Fund may be required to participate in various legal proceedings or take possession of and manage assets securing the issuer’s obligations on such securities.  This could increase the Fund’s operating expenses and adversely affect the Fund’s net asset value.  In addition, a Fund’s intention to qualify as a RIC under the Code may limit the extent to which the Fund may exercise its rights by taking possession of such assets. The ability of a holder of a tax-exempt security to enforce the terms of that security in a bankruptcy proceeding may be more limited than would be the case with respect to securities of private issuers.

Certain securities held by a Fund may permit the issuer at its option to “call,” or redeem, its securities.  If an issuer were to redeem securities held by a Fund during a time of declining interest rates, the Fund may not be able to reinvest the proceeds in securities providing the same investment return as the securities redeemed.

Zero-coupon bonds are issued at a significant discount for their principal amount in lieu of paying interest periodically.  Payment-in-kind bonds allow the issuer, at its option, to make current interest payments on the bonds either in cash or in additional

18

bonds.  Because zero-coupon bonds and payment-in-kind bonds do not pay current interest in cash, their value is subject to greater fluctuation in response to changes in market interest rates than bonds that pay interest currently.  Both zero-coupon bonds and payment-in-kind bonds allow an issuer to avoid the need to generate cash to meet current interest payments.  Accordingly, such bonds may involve greater credit risks than bonds paying interest currently in cash.  A Fund is required to accrue interest income on such investments and to distribute such amounts at least annually to shareholders even though such bonds do not pay current interest in cash.  Thus, it may be necessary at times for a Fund to liquidate investments in order to satisfy its dividend requirements.

To the extent a Fund invests in securities in the lower rating categories, the achievement of the Fund’s goals is more dependent on Schroders’ investment analysis than would be the case if the Fund were investing in securities in the higher rating categories.  This also may be true with respect to tax-exempt securities, as the amount of information about the financial condition of an issuer of tax-exempt securities may not be as extensive as that which is made available by corporations whose securities are publicly traded.

Mortgage Pass-Through Securities. A Fund may invest in mortgage pass-through securities. In the basic mortgage pass-through structure, mortgages with similar issuer, term and coupon characteristics are collected and aggregated into a “pool” consisting of multiple mortgage loans. The pool is assigned a CUSIP number and undivided interests in the pool are traded and sold as pass-through securities. The holder of the security is entitled to a pro rata share of principal and interest payments (including unscheduled prepayments) from the pool of mortgage loans.

An investment in a specific pool of pass-through securities requires an analysis of the specific prepayment risk of mortgages within the covered pool (since mortgagors typically have the option to prepay their loans). The level of prepayments on a pool of mortgage securities is difficult to predict and can impact the subsequent cash flows and value of the mortgage pool. In addition, when trading specific mortgage pools, precise execution, delivery and settlement arrangements must be negotiated for each transaction. These factors combine to make trading in mortgage pools somewhat cumbersome.

Most transactions in mortgage pass-through securities occur through the use of “to-be-announced” or “TBA transactions.” “TBA” refers to a commonly used mechanism for the forward settlement of U.S. agency mortgage pass-through securities, and not to a separate type of mortgage-backed security. TBA transactions generally are conducted in accordance with widely-accepted guidelines which establish commonly observed terms and conditions for execution, settlement and delivery. In a TBA transaction, the buyer and seller decide on general trade parameters, such as agency, settlement date, par amount and price. The actual pools delivered generally are determined two days prior to settlement date. A Fund may use TBA transactions in several ways. For example, a Fund may enter into TBA agreements and “roll over” such agreements prior to the settlement date stipulated in such agreements. This type of TBA transaction is sometimes known as a “TBA roll.” In a “TBA roll” a Fund generally will sell the obligation to purchase the pools stipulated in the TBA agreement prior to the stipulated settlement date and will enter into a new TBA agreement for future delivery of pools of mortgage pass-through securities. In addition, a Fund may enter into TBA agreements and settle such transactions on the stipulated settlement date by accepting actual receipt or delivery of the pools of mortgage pass-through securities stipulated in the TBA agreement.

Default by or bankruptcy of a counterparty to a TBA transaction would expose a Fund to possible loss because of adverse market action, expenses or delays in connection with the purchase or sale of the pools of mortgage pass-through securities specified in the TBA transaction. To minimize this risk, a Fund will enter into TBA transactions only with established counterparties (such as major broker-dealers) and a Fund’s adviser will monitor the creditworthiness of such counterparties. A Fund’s use of “TBA rolls” may cause a Fund to experience higher portfolio turnover, higher transaction costs and to pay higher capital gain distributions to shareholders (which may be taxable) than other Funds.

The Funds intend to invest cash pending settlement of any TBA transactions in money market instruments, repurchase agreements, commercial paper (including asset-backed commercial paper) or other high-quality, liquid short-term instruments, which may include money market funds affiliated with the Fund’s adviser.

Mortgage Related and Asset-Backed Securities. Mortgage-backed securities, including collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”) and certain stripped mortgage-backed securities represent a participation in, or are secured by, mortgage loans. Asset-backed securities are structured like mortgage-backed securities, but instead of mortgage loans or interests in mortgage loans, the underlying assets may include such items as motor vehicle installment sales or installment loan contracts, leases of various types of real and personal property and receivables from credit card agreements. The ability of an issuer of asset-backed securities to enforce its security interest in the underlying assets may be limited.

Mortgage-backed securities have yield and maturity characteristics corresponding to the underlying assets. Unlike traditional debt securities, which may pay a fixed rate of interest until maturity, when the entire principal amount comes due, payments on certain mortgage-backed securities include both interest and a partial repayment of principal. Besides the scheduled repayment of principal,

19

repayments of principal may result from the voluntary prepayment, refinancing or foreclosure of the underlying mortgage loans. If property owners make unscheduled prepayments of their mortgage loans, these prepayments will result in early payment of the applicable mortgage-related securities. In that event a Fund may be unable to invest the proceeds from the early payment of the mortgage-related securities in an investment that provides as high a yield as the mortgage-related securities. Consequently, early payment associated with mortgage-related securities may cause these securities to experience significantly greater price and yield volatility than that experienced by traditional fixed-income securities. The occurrence of mortgage prepayments is affected by factors including the level of interest rates, general economic conditions, the location and age of the mortgage and other social and demographic conditions. During periods of falling interest rates, the rate of mortgage prepayments tends to increase, thereby tending to decrease the life of mortgage-related securities. During periods of rising interest rates, the rate of mortgage prepayments usually decreases, thereby tending to increase the life of mortgage-related securities. If the life of a mortgage-related security is inaccurately predicted, a Fund may not be able to realize the rate of return its adviser expected.

The types of mortgages underlying securities held by the Funds may differ and may be affected differently by market factors.  For example, a Fund’s investments in residential mortgage-backed securities will likely be affected significantly by factors affecting residential real estate markets and mortgages generally; similarly, investments in commercial mortgage-backed securities will likely be affected significantly by factors affecting commercial real estate markets and mortgages generally.

Mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities are less effective than other types of securities as a means of “locking in” attractive long-term interest rates. One reason is the need to reinvest prepayments of principal; another is the possibility of significant unscheduled prepayments resulting from declines in interest rates. These prepayments would have to be reinvested at lower rates. As a result, these securities may have less potential for capital appreciation during periods of declining interest rates than other securities of comparable maturities, although they may have a similar risk of decline in market value during periods of rising interest rates. Prepayments may also significantly shorten the effective maturities of these securities, especially during periods of declining interest rates. Conversely, during periods of rising interest rates, a reduction in prepayments may increase the effective maturities of these securities, subjecting them to a greater risk of decline in market value in response to rising interest rates than traditional debt securities, and, therefore, potentially increasing the volatility of a Fund.

Prepayments may cause losses on securities purchased at a premium. At times, some mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities will have higher than market interest rates and therefore will be purchased at a premium above their par value.

If a Fund purchases mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities that are ‘subordinated’ to other interests in the same mortgage pool, the Fund as a holder of those securities may only receive payments after the pool’s obligations to other investors have been satisfied. An unexpectedly high rate of defaults on the mortgages held by a mortgage pool may limit substantially the pool’s ability to make payments of principal or interest to the Fund as a holder of such subordinated securities, reducing the values of those securities or in some cases rendering them worthless.  The risk of such defaults is generally higher in the case of mortgage pools that include so-called ‘subprime’ mortgages.  An unexpectedly high or low rate of prepayments on a pool’s underlying mortgages may have a similar effect on subordinated securities. A mortgage pool may issue securities subject to various levels of subordination; the risk of non-payment affects securities at each level, although the risk is greater in the case of more highly subordinated securities.

CMOs and CMO residuals may be issued by a U.S. Government agency or instrumentality or by a private issuer. Although payment of the principal of, and interest on, the underlying collateral securing privately issued CMOs and CMO residuals may be guaranteed by the U.S. Government or its agencies or instrumentalities, these CMOs and CMO residuals represent obligations solely of the private issuer and are not insured or guaranteed by the U.S. Government, its agencies or instrumentalities or any other person or entity.

Prepayments could cause early retirement of CMOs. CMOs are designed to reduce the risk of prepayment for investors by issuing multiple classes of securities, each having different maturities, interest rates and payment schedules, and with the principal and interest on the underlying mortgages allocated among the several classes in various ways. Payment of interest or principal on some classes or series of CMOs may be subject to contingencies or some classes or series may bear some or all of the risk of default on the underlying mortgages. CMOs of different classes or series are generally retired in sequence as the underlying mortgage loans in the mortgage pool are repaid. If enough mortgages are repaid ahead of schedule, the classes or series of a CMO with the earliest maturities generally will be retired prior to their maturities. Thus, the early retirement of particular classes or series of a CMO would have the same effect as the prepayment of mortgages underlying other mortgage-backed securities. Conversely, slower than anticipated prepayments can extend the effective maturities of CMOs, subjecting them to a greater risk of decline in market value in response to rising interest rates than traditional debt securities, and, therefore, potentially increasing their volatility.

In the case of CMO residuals, the cash flow generated by the mortgage assets underlying a series of CMOs is applied first to make required payments of principal and interest on the CMOs and second to pay the related administrative expenses of the issuer.

20

The residual in a CMO structure generally represents the interest in any excess cash flow remaining after making the foregoing payments. Each payment of such excess cash flow to a holder of the related CMO residual represents income and/or a return of capital. The amount of residual cash flow resulting from a CMO will depend on, among other things, the characteristics of the mortgage assets, the coupon rate of each class of CMO, prevailing interest rates, the amount of administrative expenses and the prepayment experience on the mortgage assets. In particular, the yield to maturity on CMO residuals is extremely sensitive to prepayments on the related underlying mortgage assets, in the same manner as an IO class of stripped mortgage-backed securities. See below with respect to stripped mortgage-backed securities. In addition, if a series of a CMO includes a class that bears interest at an adjustable rate, the yield to maturity on the related CMO residual will also be extremely sensitive to changes in the level of the index upon which interest rate adjustments are based. As described below with respect to stripped mortgage-backed securities, in certain circumstances the Fund may fail to recoup some or all of its initial investment in a CMO residual.

CMO residuals are generally purchased and sold by institutional investors through several investment banking firms acting as brokers or dealers. The CMO residual market has developed fairly recently and CMO residuals currently may not have the liquidity of other more established securities trading in other markets. Transactions in CMO residuals are generally completed only after careful review of the characteristics of the securities in question. In addition, CMO residuals may, or pursuant to an exemption therefrom, may not, have been registered under the 1933 Act. CMO residuals, whether or not registered under the 1933 Act, may be subject to certain restrictions on transferability, and may be deemed illiquid.

Prepayments could result in losses on stripped mortgage-backed securities. Stripped mortgage-backed securities are usually structured with two classes that receive different portions of the interest and principal distributions on a pool of mortgage loans. The yield to maturity on an interest only or “IO” class of stripped mortgage-backed securities is extremely sensitive not only to changes in prevailing interest rates but also to the rate of principal payments (including prepayments) on the underlying assets. A rapid rate of principal prepayments may have a measurable adverse effect on a Fund’s yield to maturity to the extent it invests in IOs. If the assets underlying the IO experience greater than anticipated prepayments of principal, a Fund may fail to recoup fully, or at all, its initial investment in these securities. Conversely, principal only securities or “POs” tend to increase in value if prepayments are greater than anticipated and decline if prepayments are slower than anticipated.

The secondary market for mortgage-backed securities, particularly stripped mortgage-backed securities, or those comprised of subprime mortgages (mortgages rated below A, or its equivalent, by Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s or Fitch) may be more volatile and less liquid than that for other mortgage-backed securities, potentially limiting a Fund’s ability to buy or sell those securities at any particular time.

Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”). GNMA is the principal governmental guarantor of mortgage-related securities. GNMA is a wholly owned corporation of the U.S. Government within the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Securities issued by GNMA are treasury securities, which means the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government backs them. GNMA guarantees the timely payment of principal and interest on securities issued by institutions approved by GNMA and backed by pools of FHA- insured or VA-guaranteed mortgages. GNMA does not guarantee the market value or yield of mortgage-backed securities or the value of a Fund’s shares. To buy GNMA securities, a Fund may have to pay a premium over the maturity value of the underlying mortgages, which a Fund may lose if prepayment occurs.

Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”). FNMA is a government-sponsored corporation owned entirely by private stockholders. FNMA is regulated by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. FNMA purchases conventional mortgages from a list of approved sellers and service providers, including state and federally-chartered savings and loan associations, mutual savings banks, commercial banks and credit unions and mortgage bankers. Securities issued by FNMA are agency securities, which means FNMA, but not the U.S. Government, guarantees their timely payment of principal and interest.

Freddie Mac.  F reddie Mac is stockholder-owned corporation established by the U.S. Congress to create a continuous flow of funds to mortgage lenders. Freddie Mac supplies lenders with the money to make mortgages and packages the mortgages into marketable securities. The system is designed to create a stable mortgage credit system and reduce the rates paid by homebuyers. Freddie Mac, not the U.S. Government, guarantees timely payment of principal and interest.

Commercial Banks, Savings and Loan Institutions, Private Mortgage Insurance Companies, Mortgage Bankers and other Secondary Market Issuers.  Commercial banks, savings and loan institutions, private mortgage insurance companies, mortgage bankers and other secondary market issuers also create pass-through pools of conventional mortgage loans. In addition to guaranteeing the mortgage-related security, such issuers may service and/or have originated the underlying mortgage loans. Pools created by these issuers generally offer a higher rate of interest than pools created by GNMA, FNMA & Freddie Mac because they are not guaranteed by a government agency.

21

Bank Loans and Other Floating Rate Loans. By purchasing a bank loan, the holder acquires some or all of the interest of a bank or other lending institution in a loan to a particular borrower. Many such loans are secured, and most impose restrictive covenants that must be met by the borrower. These loans are typically made by a syndicate of banks, represented by an agent bank that has negotiated and structured the loan and that is responsible generally for collecting interest, principal, and other amounts from the borrower on its own behalf and on behalf of the other lending institutions in the syndicate, and for enforcing its and their other rights against the borrower. Each of the lending institutions, including the agent bank, lends to the borrower a portion of the total amount of the loan, and retains the corresponding interest in the loan.

The ability of a holder of a bank loan to receive payments of principal and interest and other amounts in connection with a loan held by it will depend primarily on the financial condition of the borrower. The failure by the holder to receive scheduled interest or principal payments on a loan would adversely affect the income of the holder and would likely reduce the value of its assets, which would be reflected in a reduction in its net asset value. Banks and other lending institutions generally perform a credit analysis of the borrower before originating a loan or participating in a lending syndicate. In selecting a loan, however, Schroders would not rely solely on that credit analysis, but will perform its own investment analysis of the borrowers. Schroders’ analysis may include consideration of the borrower’s financial strength and managerial experience, debt coverage, additional borrowing requirements or debt maturity schedules, changing financial conditions, and responsiveness to changes in business conditions and interest rates. Schroders will be unable to access non-public information to which other investors in syndicated loans may have access. Because loans are not generally rated by independent credit rating agencies, a decision to invest in a particular loan will depend almost exclusively on Schroders’, and the original lending institution’s, credit analysis of the borrower. Investments in loans may be of any quality, including “distressed” loans.

Loans may be structured in different forms, including novations, assignments and loan participations. In a novation, the purchaser assumes all of the rights of a lending institution in a loan, including the right to receive payments of principal and interest and other amounts directly from the borrower and to enforce its rights as a lender directly against the borrower. The purchaser assumes the position of a co-lender with other syndicate members. As an alternative, the purchaser may purchase an assignment of a portion of a lender’s interest in a loan. In this case, the purchaser may be required generally to rely upon the assigning bank to demand payment and enforce its rights against the borrower, but would otherwise be entitled to all of such bank’s rights in the loan. The purchaser may also purchase a participating interest in a portion of the rights of a lending institution in a loan. In such case, it will be entitled to receive payments of principal, interest and premium, if any, but will not generally be entitled to enforce its rights directly against the agent bank or the borrower, and must rely for that purpose on the lending institution. The purchaser may also acquire a loan directly by acting as a member of the original lending syndicate.

The purchaser will in many cases be required to rely upon the lending institution from which it purchases the loan to collect and pass on to it such payments and to enforce its rights under the loan. As a result, an insolvency, bankruptcy or reorganization of the lending institution may delay or prevent the purchaser from receiving principal, interest and other amounts with respect to the underlying loan. If the Fund is required to rely upon a lending institution to pay to the Fund principal, interest and other amounts received by it, Schroders will also evaluate the creditworthiness of the lending institution.

The borrower of a loan in which a Fund holds a participation interest may, either at its own election or pursuant to terms of the loan documentation, prepay amounts of the loan from time to time. There is no assurance that a Fund will be able to reinvest the proceeds of any loan prepayment at the same interest rate or on the same terms as those of the original loan participation.

Corporate loans are made generally to finance internal growth, mergers, acquisitions, stock repurchases, leveraged buy-outs and other corporate activities. Under current market conditions, most of the corporate loans available for purchase will represent interests in loans made to finance highly leveraged corporate acquisitions, known as “leveraged buy-out” transactions. The highly leveraged capital structure of the borrowers in such transactions may make such loans especially vulnerable to adverse changes in economic or market conditions. In addition, loans generally are subject to restrictions on transfer, and only limited opportunities may exist to sell such loans in secondary markets. As a result, a purchaser may be unable to sell a loan at a time when it may otherwise be desirable to do so or may be able to sell them only at a price that is less than their fair market value.

Certain loans may involve revolving credit facilities under which a borrower may from time to time borrow and repay amounts up to the maximum amount of the facility. In such cases, the holder would have an obligation to advance its portion of such additional borrowings upon the terms specified in the loan. Certain of the loans acquired by the Fund may also involve loans made in foreign currencies. A Fund’s investment in such loans would involve the risks of currency fluctuations described above with respect to investments in the foreign securities.

Notwithstanding its intention generally not to receive material, non-public information with respect to its management of investments in floating rate loans, Schroders may from time to time come into possession of material, non-public information about

22

the issuers of loans that may be held in the a Fund’s portfolio. Possession of such information may in some instances occur despite Schroders’ efforts to avoid such possession, but in other instances Schroders may choose to receive such information (for example, in connection with participation in a creditors’ committee with respect to a financially distressed issuer). As, and to the extent, required by applicable law, Schroders’ ability to trade in these loans for the account of a Fund could potentially be limited by its possession of such information. Such limitations on Schroders’ ability to trade could have an adverse effect on a Fund by, for example, preventing the Fund from selling a loan that is experiencing a material decline in value. In some instances, these trading restrictions could continue in effect for a substantial period of time.

In some instances, other accounts managed by Schroders may hold other securities issued by borrowers whose floating rate loans may be held in a Fund’s portfolio. These other securities may include, for example, debt securities that are subordinate to the floating rate loans held in a Fund’s portfolio, convertible debt or common or preferred equity securities. In certain circumstances, such as if the credit quality of the issuer deteriorates, the interests of holders of these other securities may conflict with the interests of the holders of the issuer’s floating rate loans. In such cases, Schroders may owe conflicting duties to the Fund and other client accounts. Schroders will endeavor to carry out its obligations to all of its clients to the fullest extent possible, recognizing that in some cases certain clients may achieve a lower economic return, as a result of these conflicting client interests, than if Schroders’ client accounts collectively held only a single category of the issuer’s securities.

Short-Term Investments. To earn a return on uninvested assets, meet anticipated redemptions, or for temporary defensive purposes, a Fund may invest a portion of its assets in the short-term securities listed below, U.S. Government securities and investment-grade corporate debt securities. Unless otherwise specified, a short-term debt security has a maturity of one year or less.

Bank Obligations. A Fund may invest in obligations issued by banks and other savings institutions. Investments in bank obligations include obligations of domestic branches of foreign banks and foreign branches of domestic banks. Such investments in domestic branches of foreign banks and foreign branches of domestic banks may involve risks that are different from investments in securities of domestic branches of U.S. banks. These risks may include future unfavorable political and economic developments, possible withholding taxes on interest income, seizure or nationalization of foreign deposits, currency controls, interest limitations, or other governmental restrictions which might affect the payment of principal or interest on the securities held by the Funds. Additionally, these institutions may be subject to less stringent reserve requirements and to different accounting, auditing, reporting and recordkeeping requirements than those applicable to domestic branches of U.S. banks. Bank obligations include the following:

Bankers’ Acceptances .  B ankers’ acceptances are bills of exchange or time drafts drawn on and accepted by a commercial bank. Corporations use bankers’ acceptances to finance the shipment and storage of goods and to furnish dollar exchange. Maturities are generally six months or less.

Certificates of Deposit . Certificates of deposit are interest-bearing instruments with a specific maturity. They are issued by banks and savings and loan institutions in exchange for the deposit of funds and normally can be traded in the secondary market prior to maturity. Certificates of deposit with penalties for early withdrawal will be considered illiquid.

Time Deposits. Time deposits are non-negotiable receipts issued by a bank in exchange for the deposit of funds. Like a certificate of deposit, it earns a specified rate of interest over a definite period of time; however, it cannot be traded in the secondary market. Time deposits with a withdrawal penalty or that mature in more than seven days are considered to be illiquid securities.

Money Market Securities. Money market securities include short-term U.S. Government securities; custodial receipts evidencing separately traded interest and principal components of securities issued by the U.S. Treasury; commercial paper rated in the highest short-term rating category by a nationally recognized statistical ratings organization (“NRSRO”), such as Standard & Poor’s Ratings Service (“S&P”) or Moody’s Investor Service (“Moody’s”), or determined by the Fund’s adviser to be of comparable quality at the time of purchase; short-term bank obligations (certificates of deposit, time deposits and bankers’ acceptances) of U.S. commercial banks with assets of at least $1 billion as of the end of their most recent fiscal year; and repurchase agreements involving such securities. For a description of ratings, see “Appendix C – Long-Term and Short-Term Ratings” to this SAI.

Commercial Paper. Commercial paper is a short-term obligation with a maturity ranging from one to 270 days issued by banks, corporations and other borrowers. Such investments are unsecured and usually discounted. A Fund may invest in commercial paper rated A-1 or A-2 by S&P or Prime-1 or Prime-2 by Moody’s or, if not rated, issued by a corporation having an outstanding unsecured debt issue rated A or better by Moody’s or by S&P. See “Appendix C – Long-Term and Short-Term Ratings” for a description of commercial paper ratings.

Yankee Bonds. Yankee bonds are dollar-denominated bonds issued inside the United States by foreign entities. Investments in these securities involve certain risks that are not typically associated with investing in domestic securities.

23

Forward Commitments. A Fund may enter into contracts to purchase securities for a fixed price at a future date beyond customary settlement time (“forward commitments”) if the Fund holds, and maintains until the settlement date in a segregated account, cash or liquid securities in an amount sufficient to meet the purchase price, or if the Fund enters into offsetting contracts for the forward sale of other securities it owns. Forward commitments may be considered securities in themselves, and involve a risk of loss if the value of the security to be purchased declines prior to the settlement date, which risk is in addition to the risk of decline in the value of the Fund’s other assets. Where such purchases are made through dealers, the Fund relies on the dealer to consummate the sale. The dealer’s failure to do so may result in the loss to the Fund of an advantageous yield or price.

A Fund may dispose of a commitment prior to settlement if Schroders deems it appropriate to do so. A Fund may realize short-term profits or losses upon the sale of forward commitments.

Floating Rate and Variable Rate Demand Notes.   Floating rate and variable rate demand notes and bonds may have a stated maturity in excess of one year, but may have features that permit a holder to demand payment of principal plus accrued interest upon a specified number of days notice. Frequently, such obligations are secured by letters of credit or other credit support arrangements provided by banks. The issuer has a corresponding right, after a given period, to prepay in its discretion the outstanding principal of the obligation plus accrued interest upon a specific number of days notice to the holders. The interest rate of a floating rate instrument may be based on a known lending rate, such as a bank’s prime rate, and is reset whenever such rate is adjusted. The interest rate on a variable rate demand note is reset at specified intervals at a market rate.

Municipal Bonds. Municipal bonds are investments of any maturity issued by states, public authorities or political subdivisions to raise money for public purposes; they include, for example, general obligations of a state or other government entity supported by its taxing powers to acquire and construct public facilities, or to provide temporary financing in anticipation of the receipt of taxes and other revenue. They also include obligations of states, public authorities or political subdivisions to finance privately owned or operated facilities or public facilities financed solely by enterprise revenues. Changes in law or adverse determinations by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) or a state tax authority could make the income from some of these obligations taxable.  Neither of the Funds expects to qualify to pass through to shareholders the tax-exempt character of interest on municipal bonds.

Short-term municipal bonds are generally issued by state and local governments and public authorities as interim financing in anticipation of tax collections, revenue receipts or bond sales to finance such public purposes.

Certain types of “private activity” bonds may be issued by public authorities to finance projects such as privately operated housing facilities; certain local facilities for supplying water, gas or electricity; sewage or solid waste disposal facilities; student loans; or public or private institutions for the construction of educational, hospital, housing and other facilities. Such obligations are included within the term municipal bonds if the interest paid thereon is, in the opinion of bond counsel, exempt from federal income tax and state personal income tax (such interest may, however, be subject to federal alternative minimum tax). Other types of private activity bonds, the proceeds of which are used for the construction, repair or improvement of, or to obtain equipment for, privately operated industrial or commercial facilities, may also constitute municipal bonds, although current federal tax laws place substantial limitations on the size of such issues.

Participation interests . A Fund may invest in municipal bonds either by purchasing them directly or by purchasing certificates of accrual or similar instruments evidencing direct ownership of interest payments or principal payments, or both, on municipal bonds, provided that, in the opinion of counsel, any discount accruing on a certificate or instrument that is purchased at a yield not greater than the coupon rate of interest on the related municipal bonds will be exempt from federal income tax to the same extent as interest on the municipal bonds. A Fund may also invest in municipal bonds by purchasing from banks participation interests in all or part of specific holdings of municipal bonds. These participations may be backed in whole or in part by an irrevocable letter of credit or guarantee of the selling bank. The selling bank may receive a fee from the purchaser in connection with the arrangement.

Stand-by commitments . A purchaser of municipal bonds may have the ability to acquire stand-by commitments from banks and broker-dealers with respect to those municipal bonds. A stand-by commitment may be considered a security independent of the municipal bond to which it relates. The amount payable by a bank or dealer during the time a stand-by commitment is exercisable, absent unusual circumstances, would be substantially the same as the market value of the underlying municipal bond to a third party at any time. It is expected that stand-by commitments generally will be available without the payment of direct or indirect consideration. It is not expected that a Fund would assign any value to stand-by commitments.

Yields . The yields on municipal bonds depend on a variety of factors, including general money market conditions, effective marginal tax rates, the financial condition of the issuer, general conditions of the municipal bond market, the size of a particular offering, the maturity of the obligation and the rating of the issue. The ratings of nationally recognized securities rating agencies

24

represent their opinions as to the credit quality of the municipal bonds that they undertake to rate. It should be emphasized, however, that ratings are general and are not absolute standards of quality. Consequently, municipal bonds with the same maturity and interest rate but with different ratings may have the same yield. Yield disparities may occur for reasons not directly related to the investment quality of particular issues or the general movement of interest rates and may be due to such factors as changes in the overall demand or supply of various types of municipal bonds or changes in the investment objectives of investors. Subsequent to purchase, an issue of municipal bonds or other investments may cease to be rated, or its rating may be reduced below the minimum rating required for purchase by a Fund. Neither event will require the elimination of an investment from a Fund’s portfolio, but Schroders will consider such an event in its determination of whether a Fund should continue to hold an investment in its portfolio.

“ Moral obligation ” bonds . A Fund does not currently intend to invest in so-called “moral obligation” bonds, where repayment is backed by a moral commitment of an entity other than the issuer, unless the credit of the issuer itself, without regard to the “moral obligation,” meets the investment criteria established for investments by a Fund.

Municipal leases . Lease obligations or installment purchase contract obligations (collectively, “lease obligations”) of municipal authorities or entities do not constitute general obligations of the municipality for which the municipality’s taxing power is pledged. Certain of these lease obligations contain “non-appropriation” clauses, which provide that the municipality has no obligation to make lease or installment purchase payments in future years unless money is appropriated for such purpose on a yearly basis. In the case of a “non-appropriation” lease, the purchaser’s ability to recover under the lease in the event of non-appropriation or default will be limited solely to the repossession of the leased property, and in any event, foreclosure of that property might prove difficult.

Additional risks . Securities in which a Fund may invest, including municipal bonds, are subject to the provisions of bankruptcy, insolvency and other laws affecting the rights and remedies of creditors, such as the federal Bankruptcy Code (including special provisions related to municipalities and other public entities), and laws, if any, that may be enacted by Congress or state legislatures extending the time for payment of principal or interest, or both, or imposing other constraints upon enforcement of such obligations. There is also the possibility that, as a result of litigation or other conditions, the power, ability or willingness of issuers to meet their obligations for the payment of interest and principal on their municipal bonds may be materially affected.

From time to time, proposals have been introduced before Congress for the purpose of restricting or eliminating the federal income tax exemption for interest on debt obligations issued by states and their political subdivisions. Federal tax laws limit the types and amounts of tax-exempt bonds issuable for certain purposes, especially industrial development bonds and private activity bonds. Such limits may affect the future supply and yields of these types of municipal bonds.  Further proposals limiting the issuance of municipal bonds may well be introduced in the future. If it appeared that the availability of municipal bonds for investment by a Fund and the value of a Fund’s portfolio could be materially affected by such changes in law, the Trustees would reevaluate its investment objective and policies and consider changes in the structure of a Fund or its dissolution.

General Considerations Relating to State Specific Municipal Securities . With respect to municipal securities issued by a state and its political subdivisions, as well as certain other governmental issuers such as the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Trust cannot predict what legislation, if any, may be proposed in the State’s legislature in regards to the State’s personal income tax status of interest on such obligations, or which proposals, if any, might be enacted. Such proposals, if enacted, might materially adversely affect the availability of the State’s municipal securities for investment by a Fund and the value of a Fund’s investments.

Special Considerations Relating to California Municipal Securities. T he Broad Tax-Aware Value Bond Fund’s performance will be affected by the fiscal and economic health of the State of California, its political subdivisions, municipalities, agencies and authorities and political and regulatory developments affecting California municipal issuers. Developments in California may adversely affect the securities held by the Fund. Because the Fund may invest more than 25% of its assets in securities issued by California and its municipalities, it is more vulnerable to unfavorable developments in California than are funds that invest a lesser percentage of their assets in such securities. Unfavorable developments in any economic sector may have far-reaching ramifications on the overall California municipal market. Provisions of the California Constitution and state statutes that limit the taxing and spending authority of California’s governmental entities may impair the ability of California issuers to pay principal and/or interest on their obligations. Although California’s economy is broad, it has major concentrations in certain industries and may be sensitive to economic problems affecting those industries. Economic activity may be more cyclical in California than in some other states or in the nation as a whole. From time to time the State of California and various of its agencies and instrumentalities and political subdivisions may experience significant financial difficulty. Market conditions may also impact the liquidity and valuation of California municipal securities. In addition, investments in California municipal securities may be affected by natural disasters, such as earthquakes, which could impair an issuer’s ability to pay principal and/or interest on its obligations.

Special Considerations Relating to New York Municipal Securities. The Broad Tax-Aware Value Bond Fund’s performance will be affected by the fiscal and economic health of the State of New York, its political subdivisions, municipalities, agencies and authorities and political and regulatory developments affecting New York municipal issuers. Developments in New York

25

may adversely affect the securities held by the Fund. Because the Fund may invest more than 25% of its assets in securities issued by New York and its municipalities, it is more vulnerable to unfavorable developments in New York than are funds that invest a lesser percentage of their assets in such securities. Unfavorable developments in any economic sector may have far-reaching ramifications on the overall New York municipal market. Additionally, as the nation’s financial capital, New York’s economy is heavily dependent on the financial sector and may be sensitive to economic problems affecting the sector. New York also faces a particularly large degree of uncertainty from interest rate risk and equity market volatility. The New York economy tends to be more sensitive to monetary policy actions and to movements in the national and world economies than the economies of other states. Economic activity may be more cyclical in New York than in some other states or in the nation as a whole. From time to time the State of New York and various of its agencies and instrumentalities and political subdivisions may experience significant financial difficulty. Market conditions may also impact the liquidity and valuation of New York municipal securities.

Special Considerations Relating to Texas Municipal Securities. The Broad Tax-Aware Value Bond Fund’s performance will be affected by the fiscal and economic health of the State of Texas, its political subdivisions, municipalities, agencies and authorities and political and regulatory developments affecting Texas municipal issuers. Developments in Texas may adversely affect the securities held by the Fund. Because the Fund may invest more than 25% of its assets in securities issued by Texas and its municipalities, it is more vulnerable to unfavorable developments in Texas than are funds that invest a lesser percentage of their assets in such securities. Unfavorable developments in any economic sector may have far-reaching ramifications on the overall Texas municipal market. Important sectors of Texas’s economy include the oil and gas industry (including drilling, production, refining, chemicals and energy-related manufacturing) and high technology manufacturing (including computers, electronics and telecommunications equipment), along with an increasing emphasis on international trade. Each of these sectors has from time to time suffered from economic downturns. Adverse conditions in one or more of these sectors could have an adverse impact on Texas municipal securities.

securities are asked to vote upon or consent to matters materially affecting the investment.  A Fund will not lend portfolio securities to borrowers affiliated with that Fund.  The Funds do not currently expect to engage in securities lending.

Master Limited Partnerships.  A Fund may invest in master limited partnerships (“MLPs”), which are limited partnerships in which ownership units are publicly traded. MLPs often own or own interests in properties or businesses that are related to oil and gas industries, including pipelines, although MLPs may invest in other types of investments, including credit-related investments. Generally, an MLP is operated under the supervision of one or more managing general partners. Limited partners (like a Fund when it invests in an MLP) are not involved in the day-to-day management of the partnership. A Fund also may invest in companies who serve (or whose affiliates serve) as the general partner of an MLP.

Investments in MLPs are generally subject to many of the risks that apply to partnerships. For example, holders of the units of MLPs may have limited control and limited voting rights on matters affecting the partnership. There may be fewer corporate protections afforded investors in an MLP than investors in a corporation. Conflicts of interest may exist among unit holders, subordinated unit holders and the general partner of an MLP, including those arising from incentive distribution payments. MLPs that concentrate in a particular industry or region are subject to risks associated with such industry or region. MLPs holding credit-related investments are subject to interest rate risk and the risk of default on payment obligations by debt issuers. Investments held by MLPs may be illiquid. MLP units may trade infrequently and in limited volume, and they may be subject to more abrupt or erratic price movements than securities of larger or more broadly based companies.

A Fund may also hold investments in limited liability companies that have many of the same characteristics and are subject to many of the same risks as master limited partnerships.

A Fund’s investments in MLPs may be limited by the Fund’s intention to qualify as a RIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and special tax considerations may apply.  See “Taxes” below for more information.

Repurchase Agreements.  A Fund may enter into repurchase agreements without limit.  A repurchase agreement is a contract under which a Fund acquires a security for a relatively short period (usually not more than one week) subject to the obligation of the seller to repurchase and the Fund to resell such security at a fixed time and price (representing the Fund’s cost plus interest).  It is the Trust’s present intention to enter into repurchase agreements only with member banks of the Federal Reserve System and securities dealers meeting certain criteria as to creditworthiness and financial condition, and only with respect to obligations of the U.S. Government or its agencies or instrumentalities or other investment grade short-term debt obligations.  Repurchase agreements may also be viewed as loans made by a Fund that are collateralized by the securities subject to repurchase.  Schroders will monitor such transactions to ensure that the value of the underlying securities will be at least equal at all times to the total amount of the repurchase obligation, including the interest factor.  If the seller defaults, a Fund could realize a loss on the sale of the underlying security to the extent that the proceeds of sale including accrued interest are less than the resale price provided in the agreement including interest.  In addition, if the seller should be involved in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings, a Fund may incur delay and costs in selling the underlying security or may suffer a loss of principal and interest if the Fund is treated as an unsecured creditor and required to return the underlying collateral to the seller’s estate.

To the extent that a Fund has invested a substantial portion of its assets in repurchase agreements, the Fund’s investment return on such assets, and potentially the Fund’s ability to achieve its investment objectives, will depend on the counterparties’ willingness and ability to perform their obligations under the repurchase agreements.

Reverse Repurchase Agreements . In a reverse repurchase agreement transaction, a Fund sells securities to a bank or securities dealer and agrees to repurchase them at an agreed time and price.  During the period between the sale and the repurchase, the Fund will continue to receive principal and interest payments on the securities sold.  The market value of securities sold under a reverse repurchase agreement is typically greater than the amount to be paid for the related forward commitment. Reverse repurchase agreements involve the risk that the buyer of the securities might be unable to deliver them when the Fund seeks to repurchase the securities. If the buyer files for bankruptcy or becomes insolvent, the Fund may be delayed or prevented from recovering the securities from the buyer, and its use of the proceeds of the reverse repurchase agreement may be limited.

A reverse repurchase agreement is similar to a secured borrowing by a Fund and creates investment leverage.  Leverage will tend to exaggerate the effect on net asset value of any increase or decrease in the market value of a Fund’s portfolio.  A Fund may enter into reverse repurchase agreements without limit, subject to applicable law and to any limits on borrowing by a Fund at the time in question.  See “Investment Restrictions.”

Temporary Defensive Strategies.   As described in the Prospectus, Schroders may at times judge that conditions in the securities markets make pursuing a Fund’s basic investment strategies inconsistent with the best interests of its shareholders and may temporarily use alternate investment strategies primarily designed to reduce fluctuations in the value of a Fund’s assets.  In

27

implementing these “defensive” strategies, the Fund would invest in investment grade debt securities, cash, or money market instruments to any extent Schroders considers consistent with such defensive strategies. It is impossible to predict when, or for how long, a Fund will use these alternate strategies, and a Fund is not required to use alternate strategies in any case.  One risk of taking such temporary defensive positions is that a Fund may not achieve its investment objective.

Portfolio Turnover. The portfolio turnover rate may vary greatly from year to year, as well as within a particular year, and may also be affected by cash requirements for redemption of Shares.

Service Providers.   The Funds may be subject to credit risk with respect to the custodian.  In the event of the custodian’s bankruptcy, even if the Funds’ custodian does have sufficient assets to meet all claims, there could be a delay before a Fund receives assets to satisfy their claims.  In addition, in the event of the bankruptcy of the Funds’ administrator, transfer agent or custodian there are likely to be operational and other delays and additional costs and expenses associated with changes in service provider arrangements.

28

INVESTMENT RESTRICTIONS

Schroder Long Duration Investment-Grade Bond Fund

Schroder Broad Tax-Aware Value Fund

Fundamental Policies:

As fundamental investment restrictions, which may only be changed with approval by the holders of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of that Fund, each of these Funds may not:

1.                                       Issue any class of securities which is senior to the Fund’s shares of beneficial interest, except to the extent the Fund is permitted to borrow money or otherwise to the extent consistent with applicable law from time to time.

Note:  The Investment Company Act currently prohibits an open-end investment company from issuing any senior securities, except to the extent it is permitted to borrow money (see Note following restriction 2, below).

2.                                       Borrow money, except to the extent permitted by applicable law from time to time.

Note:  The Investment Company Act currently permits an open-end investment company to borrow money from a bank so long as the ratio which the value of the total assets of the investment company (including the amount of any such borrowing), less the amount of all liabilities and indebtedness (other than such borrowing) of the investment company, bears to the amount of such borrowing is at least 300%. An open-end investment company may also borrow money from other lenders in accordance with applicable law and positions of the SEC and its staff.  The Funds may engage in reverse repurchase agreements without limit, subject to applicable law.

3.                                       Act as underwriter of securities of other issuers except to the extent that, in connection with the disposition of portfolio securities, it may be deemed to be an underwriter under certain federal securities laws.

4.                                       As to 75% of its total assets, purchase any security (other than Government securities, as such term is defined in the 1940 Act, and securities of other investment companies), if as a result more than 5% of the Fund’s total assets (taken at current value) would then be invested in securities of a single issuer or the Fund would hold more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of such issuer.

Note:  Government securities are defined in the 1940 Act as any security issued or guaranteed as to principal or interest by the United States, or by a person controlled or supervised by and acting as an instrumentality of the Government of the United States pursuant to authority granted by the Congress of the United States, or any certificate of deposit for any of the foregoing.

5.                                       Purchase any security (other than Government securities, as such term is defined in the 1940 Act) if as a result 25% or more of the Fund’s total assets (taken at current value) would be invested in a single industry; for clarity, investments in other investment companies will not be considered to be investments in securities of issuers in any one industry.

6.                                       Make loans, including to affiliated investment companies, except to the extent permitted by applicable law from time to time.

7.                                       Purchase or sell commodities or commodity contracts, except to the extent permitted by applicable law from time to time.

Note: For purposes of restriction 7, all swap agreements and other instruments that were not classified as commodities or commodity contracts prior to July 21, 2010 are not deemed to be commodities or commodity contracts.

8.                                       Purchase or sell real estate or interests in real estate, including real estate mortgage loans, although the Fund may purchase and sell securities that are secured by real estate and securities of companies, including limited partnership interests, that invest or deal in real estate and it may purchase interests in real estate investment trusts.  (For purposes of this restriction, investments by the Fund in mortgage-backed securities and other securities representing interests in mortgage pools shall not constitute the purchase or sale of real estate or interests in real estate or real estate mortgage loans).

Non-Fundamental Policies:

1.                                       It is contrary to the current policy of each Fund, which policy may be changed without shareholder approval, to invest more than 15% of its net assets in securities that are not readily marketable, including securities restricted as to resale (other than securities restricted as to resale but determined by the Trustees, or persons designated by the Trustees to make such determinations, to be readily marketable).

2.                                       Each Fund may, as a matter of non-fundamental policy, engage in short sales of securities as described in this SAI from time to time, although each Fund does not normally invest substantially in short sales.

29

3.                                       Each Fund may, as a non-fundamental policy, pledge up to one-third of its assets in connection with permissible borrowings by the Fund.

4.                                       Neither Fund will, as a non-fundamental policy, invest in other companies for the purpose of exercising control of those companies.

All percentage limitations on investments will apply at the time of investment and shall not be considered violated unless an excess or deficiency occurs or exists immediately after and as a result of such investment. If a Fund ceases to maintain the 300% asset coverage ratio described in the Note following fundamental investment restriction 2, it will be expected to take steps to restore that asset coverage ratio within three days thereafter (excluding Sundays and holidays) or such longer period as may be prescribed by applicable regulations. If the percentage of the assets of a Fund invested in illiquid securities exceeds 15% of its net assets as set forth above in the Funds’ non-fundamental policy number 1, the applicable Fund will take steps to reduce the amount of illiquid securities to meet this non-fundamental policy within a time frame Schroders considers to be in the best interests of the applicable Fund.

Except for the investment restrictions listed above as fundamental or to the extent designated as such in the Prospectus, the other investment policies described in this SAI or in the Prospectus are not fundamental and may be changed by approval of the Trustees without notice to the shareholders.

The 1940 Act provides that a “vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities” of a Fund means the affirmative vote of the lesser of (1) more than 50% of the outstanding shares of that Fund, or (2) 67% or more of the shares present at a meeting if more than 50% of the outstanding shares are represented at the meeting in person or by proxy.

DISCLOSURE OF PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS

Through filings made with the SEC on Form N-CSR and Form N-Q, each Fund makes its full portfolio holdings publicly available to shareholders on a quarterly basis.  Each Fund normally makes such filings on or shortly before the sixtieth day following the end of a fiscal quarter.  Each Fund delivers its complete portfolio schedules for the second and fourth fiscal quarters, required to be filed on Form N-CSR, to shareholders in the Funds’ semi-annual and annual reports.  The Funds do not deliver their complete portfolio schedules for the first and third fiscal quarters, required to be filed on Form N-Q, to shareholders, but these schedules are available on the SEC website at www.sec.gov and on the Schroders website at www.schroderfunds.com.

In addition to filings made with the SEC, each Fund intends to make its full portfolio holdings as of the end of each calendar quarter available on the Fund’s website at www.schroderfunds.com, on the last business day of the following month.  Schroders may exclude from disclosure on the Funds’ website all or any portion of a Fund’s portfolio holdings, or modify the timing of such disclosure, as it deems necessary to protect the interests of the Funds.

To the extent that a Fund’s portfolio holdings have previously been disclosed publicly either through a filing made with the SEC on Form N-CSR or Form N-Q, or by being posted to the Funds’ website, such holdings may also be disclosed to any third party that requests them.

Policies and Procedures.  The Funds have adopted policies and procedures with respect to disclosure of the Funds’ portfolio holdings.  These procedures apply both to arrangements, expected to be in place over a period of time, to make available information about the securities in a Fund’s portfolio and with respect to disclosure on a one-time, irregular basis.  These procedures provide that neither Schroders nor STW nor the Funds receive any compensation in return for the disclosure of information about a Fund’s portfolio securities or for any ongoing arrangements to make available information about a Fund’s portfolio securities.  Portfolio holdings may be disclosed to certain third parties in advance of their public disclosure.  In each instance of such advance disclosure, a determination will have been made by Schroders or STW that such disclosure is supported by a legitimate business purpose of the relevant Fund and that the recipients, except as described below, are subject to an independent duty not to disclose (whether contractually or as a matter of law) or trade on the nonpublic information.  The Funds currently disclose nonpublic portfolio holdings information only to recipients who have agreed in writing with Schroders or STW to keep such information confidential.  In some cases these recipients are subject to a contractual obligation to keep portfolio holdings information confidential including a duty not to trade on the non-public information, and in other cases they are subject to a duty of confidentiality under the federal securities laws to keep information disclosed to them by the relevant Fund confidential.  Recipients of nonpublic portfolio holdings information are also subject to legal requirements prohibiting them from trading on material nonpublic information.  The Funds have no ongoing arrangements to make available nonpublic portfolio holdings information, except pursuant to the procedures described below.  The following list describes the circumstances in which the Funds disclose their portfolio holdings to select third parties:

30

Portfolio Managers.  Portfolio managers shall have full daily access to portfolio holdings for the Funds for which they have direct management responsibility.  Under Schroders’ code of ethics, portfolio managers are prohibited from disclosing nonpublic information to third parties, other than in accordance with the Funds’ portfolio holdings policies and procedures.  Portfolio managers may release and discuss specific portfolio holdings with various broker-dealers, on an as-needed basis, for purposes of analyzing the impact of existing and future market changes on the prices, availability or demand, and liquidity of such securities, as well as for the purpose of assisting portfolio managers in the trading of such securities.

Schroders.  Schroders personnel, including personnel of its affiliates that perform services for or related to the Funds, may have full daily access to the Funds’ portfolio holdings.  Employees of STW, Schroder Investment Management Limited and Schroder Fund Advisors LLC (“SFA”) with access to portfolio holdings information are provided with training on the Trust’s policies and procedures regarding disclosure of portfolio holdings information.  Training is provided by the Schroders compliance department in the applicable jurisdiction, after consultation with Schroders plc’s global compliance department located in London. The Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer reports to the Trustees regarding compliance by such affiliates.

External Servicing Agents . The Funds’ primary service providers, including distributors, administrators, transfer agents, custodians, and their respective personnel, may receive or have access to nonpublic portfolio holdings information on a daily basis. In addition, third parties that provide services to the Funds, and their affiliates, such as trade execution measurement systems providers, independent pricing services, proxy voting service providers, the Funds’ insurers, computer systems service providers, lenders, counsel, accountants/auditors, and rating and ranking organizations (such as Morningstar, Lipper, Thomson and Bloomberg) may also receive or have access to full portfolio holdings information more frequently than publicly available. Such parties, either by agreement or by virtue of their duties, are required to maintain confidentiality with respect to such nonpublic portfolio holdings.

Certain Intermediaries and Wrap Program Providers. The Funds may provide more frequent disclosure of the Funds’ portfolio holdings to certain intermediaries and wrap program providers, provided those third parties meet the criteria and approval requirements as set out below under “Other Third Parties.”

Other Third Parties. Any additions to the list of persons eligible to receive portfolio holdings information require approval by the President and Chief Compliance Officer of the relevant Fund.  Such disclosure may only be made where the President and Chief Compliance Officer of the relevant Fund have determined that: (i) the Fund has a legitimate business purpose for the disclosure; (ii) the disclosure is in the best interests of the Fund and its shareholders; and (iii) the recipients are subject to a confidentiality agreement, including a duty not to trade on the non-public information, or the Funds’ President and Chief Compliance Officer have determined that the policies of the recipient are adequate to protect the information that is disclosed and the entity is subject to a duty of confidentiality under the federal securities laws.  In making such determinations, the President and Chief Compliance Officer of the Fund shall review, among other considerations: (i) the type of fund involved; (ii) the purpose for receiving the holdings information; (iii) the intended use of the information; (iv) the frequency of the information to be provided; (v) the length of the lag, if any, between the date of the information and the date on which the information will be disclosed; (vi) the proposed recipient’s relationship to the Funds; (vii) the ability of Schroders to monitor that such information will be used by the proposed recipient in accordance with the stated purpose for the disclosure; and (viii) whether any potential conflicts exist regarding such disclosure between the interests of Fund shareholders, on the one hand, and those of the Fund’s investment adviser, principal underwriter, or any affiliated person of the Fund.  Such disclosures shall be reported to the Board of Trustees.

The Trust recently provided access to more frequent portfolio holdings disclosure with respect to series of the Trust with a wrap program administered by an unaffiliated entity, after a confidentiality agreement was signed and it was established that they met the other criteria outlined above.

In general, the Funds’ policies and procedures provide that disclosure by Schroders of information about the holdings of client accounts other than the Funds’ accounts is governed by the policies relating to protection of client information pursuant to Regulation S-P. Details about the holdings of any portfolio other than the Funds, however, may provide holdings information that is substantially identical to holdings of the Funds that have not yet been publicly released. The President and Chief Compliance Officer may approve disclosure by Schroders or STW of non-Fund portfolios other than to clients holding the portfolios and their consultants, provided they make certain determinations set forth in the Funds’ policies and procedures.

Nothing in the Funds’ policies and procedures prohibits any investment group from providing to a research service provider a coverage list that identifies securities that the investment group follows for research purposes provided that: (i) the list of securities does not consist exclusively of the current portfolio holdings of any Fund; and (ii) no information about actual holdings by any account is included.

31

The Board of Trustees of the Trust reviews and reapproves the policies and procedures related to portfolio disclosure, including the list of approved recipients, as often as deemed appropriate, but not less than annually, and may make any changes it deems appropriate.

*   Also serves as a member of the Audit Committees for the Trust. Mr. Gersten is the Chairman of the Audit Committees.

** Schroder Series Trust, Schroder Capital Funds (Delaware), and Schroder Global Series Trust are considered part of the same “Fund Complex” for these purposes.

33

* Ms. Mazza is an “interested person” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of the Trust. She is an “interested person” due to her status as an officer and employee of Schroders and its affiliates.

Experience, Qualifications, Attributes, and Skills of Trustees

Jay S. Calhoun.    Mr. Calhoun has extensive experience in investment finance and financial systems, as well as significant management experience.

Margaret M. Cannella.   Ms. Cannella has significant market analysis and research experience as well as extensive management experience.

Mark D. Gersten.   Mr. Gersten has extensive experience in the investment management industry as well as extensive management experience.

Catherine A. Mazza.   Ms. Mazza has significant prior executive experience and serves as the Institutional Relationship Director at Schroders.

34

35

Committees of the Board of Trustees

Audit Committee . The Board of Trustees has a separately-designated standing Audit Committee composed of all of the Disinterested Trustees of the Trust (currently, Ms. Cannella and Messrs. Calhoun, and Gersten).  The Audit Committee provides oversight with respect to the internal and external accounting and auditing procedures of the Funds and, among other things, considers the selection of the independent registered public accounting firms for the Funds and the scope of the audit, approves all audit and permitted non-audit services proposed to be performed by those accountants on behalf of the Funds, and considers other services provided by those accountants to the Funds and Schroders and their affiliates and the possible effect of those services on the independence of those accountants. The Audit Committee met three times during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2012.

Nominating Committee . All of the Disinterested Trustees (currently, Ms. Cannella and Messrs. Calhoun, and Gersten) of the Trust serve on a Nominating Committee responsible for reviewing and recommending qualified candidates to the Board in the event that a position is vacated or created.  The Nominating Committee will consider nominees recommended by shareholders if the Committee is considering other nominees at the time of the nomination and the nominee meets the Committee’s criteria. Nominee recommendations may be submitted to the Secretary of the Trust at the Trust’s principal business address. The Nominating Committee met once during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2012.

36