UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

(Mark One)

 

x

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2013

Commission File No. 1-9328

 

OR

 

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from                 to                 

 

ECOLAB INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware

 

41-0231510

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 

 

 

370 Wabasha Street North, St. Paul, Minnesota

 

55102

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:  1-800-232-6522

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class

 

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, $1.00 par value

 

New York Stock Exchange, Inc.

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:  None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. x YES o NO

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. o YES x   NO

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x YES o NO

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.  x YES o NO

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”  “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer x

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o YES x NO

 

Aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of registrant on June 30, 2013: $25,114,508,000 (see Item 12, under Part III hereof), based on a closing price of registrant’s Common Stock of $85.19 per share.

 

The number of shares of registrant’s Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share, outstanding as of January 31, 2014:  300,767,420 shares.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

1.               Portions of the registrant’s Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as “Annual Report”) are incorporated by reference into Parts I and II.

 

2.               Portions of the registrant’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held May 8, 2014 and to be filed within 120 days after the registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as “Proxy Statement”) are incorporated by reference into Part III.

 

 

 



 

PART I

 

Except where the context otherwise requires, references in this Form 10-K to “Ecolab,” “Company,” “we” and “our” are to Ecolab Inc. and its subsidiaries, collectively.

 

Forward-Looking Statements

 

This Annual Report on Form 10-K, including “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation” incorporated by reference into Item 7 of this Form 10-K,  contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  These statements include: scope, timing, costs, cash expenditures, timing of cash payments, benefits and headcount impact of our restructuring initiatives; utilization of recorded restructuring liabilities; Champion purchase price allocation adjustments; capital investments and strategic business acquisitions; share repurchases; impact of Venezuela currency re-measurement; payment of litigation settlement funds; borrowing capacity; global market risk; objective to improve credit rating; long-term potential of our business; impact of changes in exchange rates and interest rates; leveraging and simplifying global supply chain; losses due to concentration of credit risk; recognition of share-based compensation expense; future benefit plan payments; amortization expense; benefits of and synergies from the Champion and Nalco transactions; bad debt experiences and customer credit worthiness; disputes, claims and litigation; environmental contingencies; returns on pension plan assets; future cash flow and uses for cash; dividends; debt repayments; contributions to pension and postretirement healthcare plans; liquidity requirements and borrowing methods; impact of credit rating downgrade; impact of new accounting pronouncements; tax deductibility of goodwill; non-performance of counterparties; timing of hedged transactions; and income taxes, including loss carryforwards, unrecognized tax benefits and uncertain tax positions.  Without limiting the foregoing, words or phrases such as “will likely result,” “are expected to,” “will continue,” “is anticipated,” “we believe,” “we expect,” “estimate,” “project” (including the negative or variations thereof) or similar terminology, generally identify forward-looking statements.  Forward-looking statements may also represent challenging goals for us.  These statements, which represent the Company’s expectations or beliefs concerning various future events, are based on current expectations that involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those of such forward-looking statements. We caution that undue reliance should not be placed on such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made.  Some of the factors which could cause results to differ from those expressed in any forward-looking statement are set forth under Item 1A of this Form 10-K, entitled Risk Factors.

 

Item 1.  Business .

 

Item 1(a) General Development of Business .

 

Ecolab was incorporated as a Delaware corporation in 1924.  Our fiscal year is the calendar year ending December 31.

 

Effective in the first quarter of 2013, we changed our reportable segments due to a change in our underlying organizational model designed to support the business following the Nalco merger and to facilitate global growth. We did not operate under the realigned segment structure prior to 2013.  Our new segment structure focuses on global businesses, with our ten global operating units, which are also operating segments, aggregated into four reportable segments as follows:

 

·                   Global Industrial consists of the Global Water, Global Food & Beverage, Global Paper and Global Textile Care operating units.

 

·                   Global Institutional consists of the Global Institutional, Global Specialty and Global Healthcare operating units.

 

1



 

·                   Global Energy consists of the Global Energy operating unit.

 

·                   Other consists of the Global Pest Elimination and Equipment Care operating units.

 

Consistent with our internal management reporting, we also present a Corporate segment which includes amortization specifically from the Nalco merger, certain integration costs from both the Nalco and Champion transactions and the special (gains) and charges reported on our Consolidated Statement of Income.

 

In 2013, we took the following actions to continue to build our business:

 

·                               In January, we completed the acquisition of Mexico-based Quimiproductos S.A. de C.V., a producer and supplier of cleaning, sanitizing and water treatment goods and services to breweries and beverage companies located in Central and South America.  Pre-acquisition annual sales were approximately $43 million and the business became part of our Global Industrial reportable segment during the first quarter of 2013.

 

·                               In April, we acquired Champion Technologies, and its related company Corsicana Technologies (collectively “Champion”), a Houston-based global energy specialty products and services company, to strengthen our position in the fast-growing energy services market. Champion’s 2012 sales for the business acquired were approximately $1.3 billion and the business became part of our Global Energy reportable segment during the second quarter of 2013.

 

·                               In April, we acquired Russia-based OOO Master Chemicals (“Master Chemicals”).  Master Chemicals sells oil field chemicals to oil and gas producers located throughout Russia and parts of the Ukraine.  Pre-acquisition annual sales of the business were approximately $29 million.  The business became part of our Global Energy reportable segment during the second quarter of 2013.

 

·                               In August, we sold substantially all the equipment design and build business of our Mobotec air emissions control business.  The Mobotec equipment design and build business had 2012 sales of approximately $27 million, which were within our Global Industrial reportable segment. We retained Mobotec’s chemical business.

 

·                               In December, subsequent to our fiscal year end for international operations, we completed the acquisition of AkzoNobel B.V.’s Purate business which specializes in global antimicrobial water treatment.  With 2012 revenues of approximately $23 million, the Purate business provides patented, proprietary chlorine dioxide generation programs for use in a wide array of water treatment applications.  Beginning in the first quarter of 2014, the business will become part of our Global Industrial reportable segment.

 

Item 1(b) Financial Information About Operating Segments .

 

The financial information about reportable segments appearing under the heading “Operating Segments and Geographic Information” in Note 17, located on pages 63 and 64 of the Annual Report, is incorporated herein by reference.

 

2



 

Item 1(c) Narrative Description of Business .

 

General

 

With 2013 sales of $13.3 billion, we are the global leader in water, hygiene and energy technologies and services that protect people and vital resources.  We deliver comprehensive programs and services to promote safe food, maintain clean environments, optimize water and energy use and improve operational efficiencies for customers in the food, energy, healthcare, industrial and hospitality markets in more than 170 countries.  Our cleaning and sanitizing programs and products, pest elimination services, and equipment maintenance and repair services support customers in the foodservice, food and beverage processing, hospitality, healthcare, government and education, retail, textile care and commercial facilities management sectors.  Our chemicals and technologies are also used in water treatment, pollution control, energy conservation, oil production and refining, steelmaking, papermaking, mining and other industrial processes.

 

We pursue a “Circle the Customer — Circle the Globe” strategy by providing an array of programs, products and services which serve our customer base, and do so on a global basis to meet the needs of our customers’ various operations around the world.  Through this strategy and our varied product and service mix, one customer may utilize the offerings of several of our reportable segments.

 

The following description of our business is based upon four reportable segments as reported in our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2013, as incorporated by reference into Part II of this Form 10-K.  We aggregate our ten operating units into the following four reportable segments: Global Industrial; Global Institutional; Global Energy; and Other.

 

GRAPHIC

 

Global Industrial

 

This reportable segment consists of the Global Water, Global Food & Beverage, Global Paper and Global Textile Care operating units.  It provides water treatment and process applications, and cleaning and sanitizing solutions primarily to large industrial customers within the manufacturing, food and beverage processing, chemical, mining and primary metals, power generation, pulp and paper, and commercial laundry industries.  The underlying operating units exhibit similar manufacturing processes, distribution methods and economic characteristics.  Descriptions of the four operating units which comprise our Global Industrial segment follow below.

 

Global Water Our Global Water business serves customers across industrial and institutional markets, with the exception of the pulp and paper industry which is serviced by our Global Paper business and

 

3



 

the energy industries which are served by our Global Energy business.  Within Global Water, we provide products and programs for water treatment and process applications aimed at combining environmental benefits with economic gains for our customers. Our offerings include specialty products such as scale and corrosion inhibitors, antifoulants, pre-treatment solutions, membrane treatments, coagulants and flocculants, and anti-foams, as well as our 3D TRASAR TM  technology, which combines chemistry, remote services and monitoring and control. Typically, water savings, energy savings, maintenance and capital expenditure avoidance are among the primary sources of value to our customers, with product quality and production enhancement improvements also providing a key differentiating feature for many of our offerings. We serve customers in the aerospace, chemical, pharmaceutical, mining and primary metals, power, food and beverage and medium and light manufacturing, as well as institutional clients such as hospitals, universities, commercial buildings and hotels.

 

Our Global Water business provides water treatment products and programs for cooling water, boiler water, process water and waste water applications.  Our cooling water treatment programs are designed to control the main problems associated with cooling water systems — corrosion, scale and microbial fouling and contamination — in open recirculating, once-through and closed systems.  We provide integrated chemical solutions, process improvements and mechanical component modifications to optimize boiler performance and control corrosion and scale build-up. Our programs assist the production of potable water or water for plant processes by optimizing the performance of treatment chemicals and equipment in order to minimize costs and maximize return on investment. Our wastewater products and programs focus on improving overall plant economics, addressing compliance issues, optimizing equipment efficiency and improving operator capabilities and effectiveness.  Our offerings are sold primarily by our corporate account and field sales employees.

 

We believe that we have the leading market position world-wide among suppliers of products and programs for chemical treatment applications for industrial water treatment.

 

Global Food & Beverage :  Our Global Food & Beverage business addresses cleaning and sanitation at the beginning of the food chain to facilitate the processing of products for human consumption.  Global Food & Beverage provides detergents, cleaners, sanitizers, lubricants and animal health products, as well as cleaning systems, electronic dispensers and chemical injectors for the application of chemical products, primarily to dairy plants, dairy farms, breweries, soft-drink bottling plants, and meat, poultry and other food processors.  Global Food & Beverage is also a leading developer and marketer of antimicrobial products used in direct contact with meat, poultry, seafood and produce during processing in order to reduce microbial contamination.  Global Food & Beverage also designs, engineers and installs CIP (“clean-in-place”) process control systems and facility cleaning systems for its customer base.  Products for use on farms are sold through dealers and independent, third-party distributors, while products for use in processing facilities are sold primarily by our corporate account and field sales employees.

 

We believe that we are the leading supplier world-wide of cleaning and sanitizing products to the dairy plant, dairy farm, food, meat and poultry, and beverage/brewery processor industries.

 

Global Paper Our Global Paper business provides water and process applications for the pulp and paper industries.  Our Global Paper segment offers a comprehensive portfolio of programs that are used in all principal steps of the papermaking process and across all grades of paper, including graphic grades, board and packaging, and tissue and towel.  Global Paper provides its customers the same types of products and programs for water treatment and wastewater treatment as those offered by Global Water.  Also, Global Paper offers two additional specialty programs—pulp applications and paper applications.  Our pulp applications maximize process efficiency and increase pulp cleanliness and brightness in bleaching operations, as well as predict and monitor scaling potential utilizing on-line monitoring to design effective treatment programs and avoid costly failures. Our paper process applications focus on improving our customers’ operational efficiency.  Advanced sensing, monitoring

 

4



 

and automation combine with innovative chemistries and detailed process knowledge to provide a broad range of customer solutions. Specialty products include flocculants, coagulants, dewatering aids, and digester yield enhances.  Our offerings are sold primarily by our field sales employees.

 

We believe that we are one of the leading suppliers world-wide of water treatment products and process aids to the pulp and papermaking industry.

 

Global Textile Care :  Our Global Textile Care business provides products and services that manage the entire wash process through custom designed programs, premium products, dispensing equipment, water and energy management, and real time data management for large scale, complex commercial operations including uniform rental, hospitality, linen rental and healthcare laundries.  Global Textile Care’s programs are designed to meet our customers’ needs for exceptional cleaning, while extending the useful life of linen and reducing the customers’ overall operating cost.  Products and programs are marketed primarily through field sales employees and, to a lesser extent, through distributors.

 

We believe that our Global Textile Care business is one of the leading suppliers world-wide in the laundry markets in which we compete.

 

Global Institutional

 

This reportable segment consists of the Global Institutional, Global Specialty and Global Healthcare operating units.  It provides specialized cleaning and sanitizing products to the foodservice, hospitality, lodging, healthcare, government and education and retail industries.  The underlying operating units exhibit similar manufacturing processes, distribution methods and economic characteristics.  Descriptions of the three operating units which comprise our Global Institutional segment follows below.

 

Global Institutional : Our Global Institutional business sells specialized cleaners and sanitizers for washing dishes, glassware, flatware, foodservice utensils and kitchen equipment (“warewashing”), plus specialized cleaners for various applications throughout food service operations, for on premise laundries (typically used by hotel and healthcare customers) and for general housekeeping functions, as well as food safety products and equipment, water filters, dishwasher racks and related kitchen sundries to the foodservice, lodging, educational and healthcare industries.  Global Institutional also provides pool and spa treatment programs for hospitality and other commercial customers, as well as a broad range of janitorial cleaning and floor care products and programs to customers in hospitality, healthcare and commercial facilities.  Global Institutional develops various chemical dispensing systems which are used by our customers to efficiently and safely dispense our cleaners and sanitizers.  In addition, the Global Institutional operating unit markets a lease program comprised of energy-efficient dishwashing machines, detergents, rinse additives and sanitizers, including full machine maintenance.  Through our EcoSure Food Safety Management business, Global Institutional also provides customized on-site evaluations, training and quality assurance services to foodservice operations.

 

Global Institutional sells its products and programs primarily through Company-employed field sales personnel.  Corporate account sales personnel establish relationships and negotiate contracts with larger multi-unit or “chain” customers.  We also utilize independent, third-party foodservice, broad-line and janitorial distributors to provide logistics to end customers for accounts that prefer to purchase through these distributors.  Many of these distributors also participate in marketing our product and service offerings to the end customers.  Through our Company-employed field sales and service personnel, we generally provide the same customer support to end-use customers supplied by these distributors as we do to direct customers.

 

We believe that we are the leading global supplier of warewashing and laundry products and programs to the food service and hospitality markets.

 

5



 

Global Specialty :  Our Global Specialty operating unit supplies cleaning and sanitizing chemical products and related items primarily to regional, national and international quick service restaurant (“QSR”) chains and food retailers (i.e., supermarkets and grocery stores).  Its products include specialty and general purpose hard surface cleaners, degreasers, sanitizers, polishes, hand care products and assorted cleaning tools and equipment which are primarily sold under the “Kay” and “Ecolab” brand names.  Global Specialty’s cleaning and sanitation programs are customized to meet the needs of the market segments it serves and are designed to provide highly effective cleaning performance, promote food safety, reduce labor costs and enhance user and guest safety.  A number of product dispensing options are available for products in the core product range.  Global Specialty supports its product sales with employee training programs and technical support designed to meet the special needs of its customers.

 

Both Global Specialty’s QSR business and its food retail business utilize a corporate account sales force which establishes relationships and negotiates contracts with customers at the corporate headquarters and regional office levels (and, in the QSR market segment, at the franchisee level) and a field sales force which provides program support at the individual restaurant or store level.  Customers in the QSR market segment are primarily supplied through third party distributors while most food retail customers utilize their own distribution networks. While Global Specialty’s customer base has grown over the years, Global Specialty’s business remains largely dependent upon a limited number of major QSR chains and franchisees and large food retail customers.

 

We believe that Global Specialty is the leading supplier of cleaning and sanitizing products to the global QSR market and a leading supplier of cleaning and sanitizing products to the global food retail market.

 

Global Healthcare : Our Global Healthcare business provides infection prevention and other healthcare-related offerings to acute care hospitals, surgery centers, dental offices and veterinary clinics.  Global Healthcare’s proprietary infection prevention products (hand hygiene, hard surface disinfectants, instrument cleaners, patient drapes, fluid control products, equipment drapes and surgical fluid, warming and cooling systems) are sold primarily under the “Ecolab”, “Microtek” and “OR Solutions” brand names to various departments within the acute care environment (Infection Control, Environmental Services, Central Sterile and Operating Room). Global Healthcare’s Microtek Medical business is a leader in niche branded specialty surgical drapes and fluid control products.  Global Healthcare’s OR Solutions business is a leading developer and marketer of surgical fluid warming and cooling systems.  Global Healthcare sells its products and programs primarily through Company-employed field sales personnel but also sells through healthcare distributors. Primarily in Europe, Global Healthcare also manufactures and markets disinfectants and related products for contamination control in critical environments such as pharmaceutical and hospital clean rooms.

 

We believe Global Healthcare is a leading supplier of infection prevention products in the United States and Europe.

 

Global Energy

 

This reportable segment, which operates under the Nalco Champion name, consists of the Global Energy operating unit.  It serves the process chemicals and water treatment needs of the global petroleum and petrochemical industries in both upstream and downstream applications.

 

Our Global Energy segment provides on-site, technology-driven solutions to the global drilling, oil and gas production, refining, and petrochemical industries.  Our product and service portfolio includes corrosion inhibitors, scale control additives, biocides, cleaners, hydrate control, H s S scavengers, oil dispersants, asphaltene and paraffin control, foamers and anti-foams, flow assurance, oil/water separation, heavy crude desalting, monomer inhibitors, anti-oxidants, fuel and lubricant additives, air

 

6



 

emission control and combustion efficiency, and traditional water treatment.  Our customers include nearly all of the largest publicly traded oil companies.  Our Global Energy offerings are sold primarily by our corporate account and field sales employees.  The Global Energy segment operates an Upstream group composed of our WellChem, Oilfield Chemicals and Enhanced Oil Recovery businesses and a Downstream refinery and petrochemical processing business.

 

·                   Well Stimulation and Completion:   Our WellChem business supplies chemicals for the cementing, drilling, fracturing and acidizing phases of well drilling and stimulation.  Our integrated approach to product development combines marketing and research efforts supported with process simulation, pilot plants and full-scale manufacturing capabilities.

 

·                   Oilfield Applications:   Our Oilfield Chemicals business provides solutions to the oil and gas production sector.  We have expertise in crude oil and natural gas production, pipeline gathering/transmission systems, gas processing, and heavy oil and bitumen upgrading.  Our priority is to safely manage the critical challenges facing today’s oil and gas producers throughout the lifecycle of their assets.  Starting with the design/capital investment phase to asset decommission, a lifecycle approach to chemical solutions and offerings help our customers minimize risk, achieve their production targets and maximize profitability.

 

·                   Enhanced Oil Recovery:   We provide custom engineered chemical solutions that increase production of crude oil and gas from existing fields, which are marketed primarily through our TIORCO TM  joint venture with Stepan Company.  TIORCO integrates enhanced oil recovery (“EOR”) processes by leveraging our polymer and reservoir expertise and Stepan’s global surfactant technology and manufacturing capabilities.

 

·                   Downstream Refining Applications:   Our industry-focused sales engineers provide products and programs for process and water treatment applications specific to the petroleum refining and fuels industry, enabling our customers to profitably refine and upgrade hydrocarbons.  Our heavy oil upgrading programs minimize operation costs and mitigate fouling, corrosion, foaming and the effects of heavy metals when refining opportunity crudes. We also offer an entire line of fuel additives, including corrosion inhibitors, to protect engine fuel systems and pre-market underground storage tanks and piping.  In addition, we offer fuel stabilizers, pour point depressants, cetane improvers, detergents and antioxidants for home heating oil and premium diesel and gasoline packages.

 

·                   Downstream Chemical Processing Applications:   Our customized process and water treatment programs are delivered by onsite technical experts who are focused on providing improved system reliability, reduced total cost of operations, environmental compliance, sustainability in the form of energy and water savings and reduced carbon emissions.

 

·                   Water Treatment Applications:   We also provide total water and wastewater management solutions specific to customers’ refining and chemical processing needs including boiler treatment, cooling water treatment and wastewater treatment.

 

We believe that our Global Energy segment has a leading market position in the geographic markets it serves.

 

Other

 

This reportable segment consists of the Global Pest Elimination and Equipment Care operating units.  It provides pest elimination and kitchen repair and maintenance, with its two operating units that are primarily fee-for-service businesses. In general, these businesses provide service which can augment or extend our product offerings to our business customers as a part of our “Circle the Customer” approach

 

7



 

and, in particular, by enhancing our food safety capabilities.

 

Global Pest Elimination :  Global Pest Elimination provides services designed to detect, eliminate and prevent pests, such as rodents and insects, in restaurants, food and beverage processors, educational and healthcare facilities, hotels, quick service restaurant and grocery operations and other institutional and commercial customers.  The services of Global Pest Elimination are sold and performed by Company-employed field sales and service personnel.

 

Our Global Pest Elimination business continues to expand its geographic coverage.  In addition to the United States, which constitutes the largest operation, we operate this business in various countries in Asia Pacific, Western Europe, Latin America and South Africa, with the largest operations in France, the United Kingdom and Brazil.

 

We believe Global Pest Elimination is one of the leading suppliers of pest elimination programs to the commercial, hospitality and institutional markets in the geographies we serve.

 

Equipment Care :  Our Equipment Care business provides equipment repair, maintenance and preventive maintenance services for the commercial food service industry.  Repair services are offered for in-warranty repair, acting as the manufacturer’s authorized service agent, as well as after-warranty repair. In addition, Equipment Care operates as a parts distributor to repair service companies and end-use customers. At this time, the Equipment Care business operates solely in the United States.

 

We believe that our Equipment Care business is a leading provider of equipment maintenance and repair programs to the commercial food service industry in the United States locations in which we compete.

 

Additional Information

 

International Operations : We directly operate in approximately 90 countries outside of the United States through wholly-owned subsidiaries or, in some cases, through a joint venture with a local partner.  In certain countries, selected products are sold by our export operations to distributors, agents or licensees, although the volume of those sales is not significant in terms of our overall revenues.  In general, our businesses conducted outside the United States are similar to those conducted in the United States.

 

GRAPHIC

 

Our business operations outside the United States are subject to the usual risks of foreign operations, including possible changes in trade and foreign investment laws, international business laws and regulations, tax laws, currency exchange rates and economic and political conditions abroad.  The profitability of our International operations has historically been lower than the profitability of our

 

8



 

businesses in the United States, due to (i) the additional cost of operating in numerous and diverse foreign jurisdictions, (ii) higher costs of importing certain raw materials and finished goods in some regions, (iii) the smaller scale of international operations where certain operating locations are smaller in size and (iv) the additional reliance on distributors and agents in certain countries which can negatively impact our margins.  Proportionately larger investments in sales and technical support are also necessary in certain geographies in order to facilitate the growth of our international operations.

 

Competition : In general, the markets in which the businesses in our Global Industrial segment compete are led by a few large companies, with the rest of the market served by smaller entities focusing on more limited geographic regions or a smaller subset of products and services. Our businesses in these segments compete on the basis of their demonstrated value, technical expertise, chemical formulations, customer support, detection equipment, monitoring services, and dosing and metering equipment.

 

The businesses in our Global Institutional and Other segments have two significant classes of competitors.  First, we compete with a small number of large companies selling directly or through distributors on a national or international scale.  Second, we have numerous smaller regional or local competitors which focus on more limited geographies, product lines and/or end-use customer segments.  We believe we compete principally by providing superior value, premium customer support and differentiated products to help our customers protect their brand reputation.

 

Our business in our Global Energy segment competes with a limited number of multinational companies, with the remainder of the market comprised of smaller, regional niche companies focused on limited geographic areas.  We compete in this business on the basis of our product and service quality, technical expertise, chemical formulations and emphasis on safety and environmental leadership.

 

Sales : Products, systems and services are primarily marketed in domestic and international markets by Company-trained field sales personnel who also advise and assist our customers in the proper and efficient use of the products and systems in order to meet a full range of cleaning and sanitation, water treatment and process chemistry needs.  Independent, third-party distributors are utilized in several markets, as described in the business unit descriptions found under the discussion of the four reportable segments above.

 

Number of Employees : We had approximately 45,415 employees as of December 31, 2013.

 

Customers and Classes of Products :  We believe that our business is not materially dependent upon a single customer.  Additionally, although we have a diverse customer base and no customer or distributor constitutes 10 percent or more of our 2013 consolidated revenues, we do have customers and independent, third-party distributors, the loss of which could have a material adverse effect on results of operations for the affected earnings periods; however, we consider it unlikely that such an event would have a material adverse impact on our financial position.  No material part of our business is subject to renegotiation or termination at the election of a governmental unit.

 

We sold two classes of products within the Global Institutional segment which comprised 10% or more of consolidated net sales in any of the last three years.  Sales of warewashing products were approximately 10% of 2013 consolidated net sales, approximately 11% in 2012 and approximately 18% in 2011.  In addition, through our Institutional and Textile Care businesses around the world, we sell laundry products to a broad range of laundry customers.  Sales of laundry products were approximately 10% of consolidated net sales in 2011.

 

Patents and Trademarks :  We own and license a number of patents, trademarks and other intellectual property.  While we have an active program to protect our intellectual property by filing for patents or trademarks, and pursuing legal action, when appropriate, to prevent infringement, we do not believe that our overall business is materially dependent on any individual patent or trademark except patents

 

9



 

related to our TRASAR and 3D TRASAR technology, which are material to our Global Water and Global Paper segments, and trademarks related to Ecolab, Nalco Company and 3D TRASAR.  The Ecolab trademarks are material to the Global Industrial, Global Institutional and Other segments and the Nalco trademarks are material to the Global Water, Global Paper and Global Energy businesses.  The 3D TRASAR trademarks predominantly relate to our Global Water and Global Paper segments.  U.S. and foreign patents protect aspects of our key TRASAR and 3D TRASAR technology until at least 2024. The Ecolab, Nalco Company and 3D TRASAR trademarks are registered or applied for in all of our key markets, and we anticipate maintaining them indefinitely.

 

Seasonality :  We experience variability in our quarterly operating results due to seasonal sales volume and business mix fluctuations in our operating segments.  Note 18, entitled “Quarterly Financial Data” located on page 65 of the Annual Report, is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Working Capital :  We have invested in the past, and will continue to invest in the future, in merchandising and customer equipment consisting primarily of systems used by customers to dispense our products as well as to monitor water systems.  Otherwise, we have no unusual working capital requirements.

 

Manufacturing and Distribution :  We manufacture most of our products and related equipment in Company-operated manufacturing facilities. Some products are also produced for us by third-party contract manufacturers.  Other products and equipment are purchased from third-party suppliers.  Additional information on product/equipment sourcing is found in the segment discussions above and additional information on our manufacturing facilities is located beginning at page 26 of this Form 10-K under the heading “Properties.”

 

Deliveries to customers are made from our manufacturing plants and a network of distribution centers and third-party logistics service providers.  We use common carriers, our own delivery vehicles, and distributors for transport.  Additional information on our plant and distribution facilities is located beginning at page 26 of this Form 10-K under the heading “Properties.”

 

Raw Materials :  Raw materials purchased for use in manufacturing our products are inorganic chemicals, including alkalis, acids, biocides, phosphonates, phosphorous materials, silicates and salts; and organic chemicals, including acids, amines, fatty acids, surfactants, solvents, monomers and polymers.  Global Healthcare purchases plastic films and parts to manufacture medical devices that serve the surgical and infection prevention markets.  Pesticides used by our Pest Elimination Division are purchased as finished products under contract or purchase order from the producers or their distributors.  We also purchase packaging materials for our manufactured products and components for our specialized cleaning equipment and systems.  We purchase more than 8,000 raw materials, with the largest single raw material representing less than 3% of raw material purchases.  Our raw materials, with the exception of a few specialized chemicals which we manufacture, are generally purchased on an annual contract basis and are ordinarily available in adequate quantities from a diverse group of suppliers globally.  When practical, global sourcing is used so that purchasing or production locations can be shifted to control product costs at globally competitive levels.

 

Research and Development :  Our research and development program consists principally of devising and testing new products, processes, techniques and equipment, improving the efficiency of existing ones, improving service program content, evaluating the environmental compatibility of products and technical support. Key disciplines include analytical and formulation chemistry, microbiology, process and packaging engineering, remote monitoring engineering and product dispensing technology.  Substantially all of our principal products have been developed by our research, development and engineering personnel. At times, technology has also been licensed from third parties to develop offerings.

 

10



 

We believe that continued research and development activities are critical to maintaining our leadership position within the industry and will provide us with a competitive advantage as we seek additional business with new and existing customers.

 

Note 14, entitled “Research Expenditures” located on page 56 of the Annual Report, is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Joint Ventures : Over time, certain of our business units have entered into partnerships or joint ventures in order to meet local ownership requirements, to more quickly achieve operational scale, to expand our ability to provide our customers a more fully integrated offering or to provide other benefits to our business or customers.  In particular, our Global Energy and Global Water businesses are parties to numerous joint ventures, though many of our other business units also conduct some business through joint ventures.  During 2013, the impact on our consolidated net income of our joint ventures, in the aggregate, was less than one percent.  The table below identifies our most significant consolidated and non-consolidated joint ventures, summarized by the primary purpose of the joint venture.

 

Local Ownership Requirements / Geographic Expansion

 

Joint Venture

 

Location

 

Segment

Nalco Angola Prestaca de Servicos

 

Angola

 

Global Energy

Nalco Saudi

 

Saudi Arabia

 

Global Energy, Global Industrial

Rauan Nalco LLP

 

Kazakhstan

 

Global Energy

Emirates National Chemicals

 

United Arab Emirates

 

Global Energy

Ecolab SA

 

Venezuela

 

Global Institutional, Global Industrial

P.T. Champion Kurnia Djaja Technologies

 

Indonesia

 

Global Energy

Malaysian Energy Chemical

 

Malaysia

 

Global Energy

OWT Oil-Water Treatment Services B.V.

 

Netherlands

 

Global Energy

Champion Dai-ichi Technologies India

 

India

 

Global Energy

 

Operational Scale / Geographic Critical Mass 

 

Joint Venture

 

Location

 

Segment

Katayama Chemical

 

Japan

 

Global Industrial

Nalco Protea Chemicals

 

Southern Africa

 

Global Energy, Global Industrial

 

Technology / Expanded Product Offering / Manufacturing Capability

 

Joint Venture

 

Location

 

Segment

Treated Water Outsourcing

 

United States

 

Global Industrial

Derypol

 

Spain

 

Global Industrial

OOO Kogalym plant

 

Russia

 

Global Energy

Century LLC

 

United States

 

Global Institutional

TIORCO

 

Global

 

Global Energy

Nalco Element JV

 

Russia

 

Global Energy

 

We will continue to evaluate the potential for partnerships and joint ventures that can assist us in increasing our geographic, technological and product reach.

 

Environmental and Regulatory Considerations :  Our businesses are subject to various legislative enactments and regulations relating to the protection of the environment and public health.  While we cooperate with governmental authorities and take commercially practicable measures to meet regulatory requirements and avoid or limit environmental effects, some risks are inherent in our businesses. Among the risks are costs associated with transporting and managing hazardous materials and waste disposal and plant site clean-up, fines and penalties if we are found to be in violation of law, as well as modifications, disruptions or discontinuation of certain operations or types of operations including

 

11



 

product recalls and reformulations.  Similarly, the need for certain of our products and services is dependent upon or might be limited by governmental laws and regulations.  Changes in such laws and regulations, including among others, air pollution regulations and regulations relating to oil and gas production (including those related to hydraulic fracturing), could impact the sales of some of our products or services.  In addition to an increase in costs of manufacturing and delivering products, a change in production regulations or product regulations could result in interruptions to our business and potentially cause economic or consequential losses should we be unable to meet the demands of our customers for products.

 

Additionally, although we are not currently aware of any such circumstances, there can be no assurance that future legislation or enforcement policies will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.  Environmental and regulatory matters most significant to us are discussed below.

 

Ingredient Legislation :  Various laws and regulations have been enacted by state, local and foreign jurisdictions pertaining to the sale of products which contain phosphorous, volatile organic compounds, or other ingredients that may impact human health or the environment. Under California Proposition 65, for example, label disclosures are required for certain products containing chemicals listed by California.  Chemical management initiatives that promote pollution prevention through research and development of safer chemicals and safer chemical processes are being advanced by certain states, including California, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Oregon and South Carolina.  Environmentally preferable purchasing programs for cleaning products have been enacted in nine states to date, and in 2012 were considered by several other state legislatures.  Cleaning product ingredient disclosure legislation has been introduced in the U.S. Congress in each of the past few years but has not passed, and several states including California and New York are considering further regulations in this area.  The California Safer Consumer Products Act regulations became effective in 2013 and focus on ingredients in consumer products that have the potential for widespread public exposure.  The U.S. Government is monitoring “green chemistry” initiatives through a variety of initiatives, including its “Design for the Environment” (“DfE”) program.  DfE has three broad areas of work (recognition of safer products on a DfE label, development of best practices for industrial processes and evaluation of safer chemicals), and we are involved in these to varying degrees.  Ecolab’s Institutional cleaning products are subject to the regulations and may incur additional stay-in-market expenses associated with conducting the required alternatives analyses for chemicals of concern.  To date, Ecolab generally has been able to comply with such legislative requirements by reformulation or labeling modifications.  Such legislation has not had a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows to date.

 

TSCA Re-authorization of the Toxic Substances Control Act (“TSCA”) and an update of the chemicals on the TSCA Inventory (the so-called “reset” of the TSCA Inventory) are again being discussed in the U.S. Congress, and also has garnered considerable discussion with the business and non-governmental communities. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) also is more aggressively using the existing TSCA tools to manage chemicals of concern.  We anticipate that compliance with new requirements under TSCA could be similar to the costs associated with REACH in the European Union, which is discussed below.

 

12



 

REACH :  The European Union has enacted a regulatory framework for the Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals (“REACH”).  It established a new European Chemicals Agency (“ECHA”) in Helsinki, Finland, which is responsible for evaluating data to determine hazards and risks and to manage this program for authorizing chemicals for sale and distribution in Europe.  We met the pre-registration requirements of REACH, the 2010 and 2013 registration deadlines, and are on track to meet the upcoming registration deadlines and requirements in 2018.  To help manage this  program, we have been simplifying our product line and working with chemical suppliers to comply with registration requirements.  Potential costs to us are not yet fully quantifiable, but are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations or cash flows in any one reporting period or on our financial position.

 

GHS In 2003, the United Nations issued a standard on hazard communication and labeling of chemical products known as the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (“GHS”). GHS is designed to facilitate international trade and increase safe handling and use of hazardous chemicals through a worldwide system that classifies chemicals based on their intrinsic hazards and communicates information about those hazards through standardized product labels and safety data sheets (“SDSs”). Most countries in which we operate will adopt GHS-related legislation, and numerous countries already have done so. The primary cost of compliance revolves around reclassifying products and revising SDSs and product labels, and we are working toward a phased-in approach to mitigate the costs of GHS implementation.  Potential costs to us are not yet fully quantifiable, but are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations or cash flows in any one reporting period or on our financial position.

 

Pesticide and Biocide Legislation : Various international, federal and state environmental laws and regulations govern the manufacture and/or use of pesticides. We manufacture and sell certain disinfecting, sanitizing and material preservation products that kill or reduce microorganisms (bacteria, viruses, fungi) on hard environmental surfaces, in process fluids and on certain food products. Such products constitute “pesticides” or “antimicrobial pesticides” under the current definitions of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (“FIFRA”), as amended by the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996, the principal federal statute governing the manufacture, labeling, handling and use of pesticides. We maintain several hundred product registrations with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”). Registration entails the necessity to meet certain efficacy, toxicity and labeling requirements and to pay on-going registration fees. In addition, each state in which these products are sold requires registration and payment of a fee. In general, the states impose no substantive requirements different from those required by FIFRA. However, California and certain other states have adopted additional regulatory programs, and California imposes a tax on total pesticide sales in that state. While the cost of complying with rules as to pesticides has not had a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows to date, the costs and delays in receiving necessary approvals for these products continue to increase. Total fees paid to the EPA and the states to obtain or maintain pesticide registrations, and for the California tax, were approximately $4.2 million in 2013 and $3.7 million in 2012.

 

In Europe, the Biocidal Product Directive and the more recent Biocidal Products Regulation established a program to evaluate and authorize marketing of biocidal active substances and products. We are working with suppliers and industry groups to manage

 

13



 

these requirements and have met the first relevant deadline of the program by the timely submission of dossiers for active substances. Anticipated registration costs, which will be incurred through the multi-year phase-in period, will be significant; however, these costs are not expected to significantly affect our consolidated results of operations or cash flows in any one reporting period or our financial position.

 

In addition, our Global Pest Elimination business applies restricted-use pesticides that it generally purchases from third parties. That Division must comply with certain standards pertaining to the use of such pesticides and to the licensing of employees who apply such pesticides. Such regulations are enforced primarily by the states or local jurisdictions in conformity with federal regulations. We have not experienced material difficulties in complying with these requirements.

 

FDA Antimicrobial Product Requirements : Various laws and regulations have been enacted by federal, state, local and foreign jurisdictions regulating certain products manufactured and sold by us for controlling microbial growth on humans, animals and foods.  In the United States, these requirements generally are administered by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”). However, the U.S. Department of Agriculture and EPA also may share in regulatory jurisdiction of antimicrobials applied to food. The FDA codifies “Good Manufacturing Practices” for these products in order to ensure product quality, safety and effectiveness.  The FDA also has been expanding requirements applicable to such products, including proposing regulations for over-the-counter (“OTC”) antiseptic drug products, which may impose additional requirements associated with antimicrobial hand care products and associated costs when finalized by the FDA. To date, such requirements have not had a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

 

Medical Device and Drug Product Requirements :  As a manufacturer, distributor and marketer of medical devices, we also are subject to regulation by the FDA and corresponding regulatory agencies of the state, local and foreign governments in which we sell our products.  These regulations govern the development, testing, manufacturing, packaging, labeling, distribution and marketing of medical devices.  We also are required to register with the FDA as a medical device manufacturer, comply with post-market reporting (e.g., MDR and Recall) requirements, and to comply with the FDA’s Quality System Regulations which require that we have a quality system for the design and production of our products intended for commercial distribution in the United States and satisfy recordkeeping requirements with respect to our manufacturing, testing and control activities.  Countries in the European Union require that certain products being sold within their jurisdictions obtain a “CE mark”, an international symbol of adherence to quality assurance standards, and be manufactured in compliance with certain requirements (e.g., Medical Device Directive 93/42/ECC, as amended by 2007/47/EC, and ISO 13485).  We have CE mark approval to sell various medical device products in Europe.  Our other international non-European operations also are subject to government regulation and country-specific rules and regulations.  Regulators at the federal, state and local level have imposed, are currently considering and are expected to continue to impose regulations on medical devices and drug products.  No prediction can be made of the potential effect of any such future regulations, and there can be no assurance that future legislation or regulations will not increase the costs of our products or prohibit the sale or use of certain products.

 

14



 

Other Environmental Legislation; Capital Expenditures : Our manufacturing plants are subject to federal, state, local or foreign jurisdiction laws and regulations relating to discharge of hazardous substances into the environment and to the transportation, handling and disposal of such substances. The primary federal statutes that apply to our activities in the United States are the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. We are also subject to the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986, which imposes certain reporting requirements as to emissions of hazardous substances into the air, land and water. Similar legal requirements apply to Ecolab’s facilities globally.  We make capital investments and expenditures to comply with environmental laws and regulations, to ensure employee safety and to carry out our announced environmental sustainability principles. To date, such expenditures have not had a significant adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows. Our capital expenditures for environmental, health and safety projects worldwide were approximately $15 million in 2013 and $20 million in 2012.  Approximately $50 million has been budgeted globally for projects in 2014.

 

Climate Change : Various laws and regulations pertaining to climate change have been implemented or are being considered for implementation at the international, national, regional and state levels, particularly as they relate to the reduction of greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions. None of these laws and regulations directly apply to Ecolab at the present time; however, as a matter of corporate policy, Ecolab supports a balanced approach to reducing GHG emissions while sustaining economic growth and competitiveness. Ecolab is committed to reducing its carbon footprint.  To help manage risks from GHG emissions and identify cost-effective reduction opportunities, Ecolab joined  EPA’s Climate Leaders program in 2005.  Though EPA announced in 2010 that it was dissolving the program, Ecolab has continued with much of its work to reduce its carbon footprint.  For example, Ecolab has developed a U.S.-based GHG inventory of the six major greenhouse gases and reported progress against Ecolab’s goal of reducing GHG emissions by 19% per dollar sales from 2006 to 2012.  Using the combined company’s 2012 metrics as an operational baseline, Ecolab set new goals in 2013 to further improve its environmental impact within the next five years. Among these new targets, Ecolab will work to achieve a five percent reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, a 10 percent reduction in water use and wastewater discharge, and a 10 percent reduction in the disposal of solid waste, per million dollars in sales. We also leverage over one million customer locations globally to reduce energy and greenhouse gas emissions through high-efficiency solutions in cleaning and sanitation, water, paper and energy services.  These actions directly reduce greenhouse gas emissions by lessening the demand for energy.  We can indirectly reduce energy demand by recognizing the critical connection of water and energy, especially in industrial processes reliant on water to transmit thermal energy.  Our customers employ our technologies and expertise in an exponentially greater scale to improve their own overall energy use.

 

Environmental Remediation and Proceedings : Along with numerous other potentially responsible parties (“PRP”), we are currently involved with waste disposal site clean-up activities imposed by the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) or state equivalents at 42 sites in the United States. Additionally, we have similar liability at eight sites outside the United States. In general, under CERCLA, we and each other PRP that actually contributed hazardous substances to a Superfund site are jointly and severally liable for the costs associated with cleaning up the site. Customarily, the PRPs will work with the EPA to agree and implement a plan for site remediation.

 

15



 

Based on an analysis of our experience with such environmental proceedings, our estimated share of all hazardous materials deposited on the sites referred to in the preceding paragraph, and our estimate of the contribution to be made by other PRPs which we believe have the financial ability to pay their shares, we have accrued our best estimate of our probable future costs relating to such known sites. Unasserted claims are not reflected in the accrual. In establishing accruals, potential insurance reimbursements are not included. The accrual is not discounted. It is not feasible to predict when the amounts accrued will be paid due to the uncertainties inherent in the environmental remediation and associated regulatory processes.

 

We have also been named as a defendant in lawsuits where our products have not caused injuries, but the claimants wish to be monitored for potential future injuries. We cannot predict with certainty the outcome of any such tort claims or the involvement we or our products might have in such matters in the future and there can be no assurance that the discovery of previously unknown conditions will not require significant expenditures. In each of these chemical exposure cases, our insurance carriers have accepted the claims on our behalf (with or without reservation) and our financial exposure should be limited to the amount of our deductible; however, we cannot predict the number of claims that we may have to defend in the future and we may not be able to continue to maintain such insurance.

 

We have also been named as a defendant in a number of lawsuits alleging personal injury due to exposure to hazardous substances, including multi-party lawsuits alleging personal injury in connection with our products and services.  While we do not believe that any of these suits will be material to us based upon present information, there can be no assurance that these environmental matters could not have, either individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

 

Our worldwide net expenditures for contamination remediation were approximately $4.2 million in 2013 and $2.4 million in 2012.  Our worldwide accruals at December 31, 2013 for probable future remediation expenditures, excluding potential insurance reimbursements, totaled approximately $22 million. We review our exposure for contamination remediation costs periodically and our accruals are adjusted as considered appropriate. While the final resolution of these issues could result in costs below or above current accruals and, therefore, have an impact on our consolidated financial results in a future reporting period, we believe the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

 

Disclosure of Certain Activities Related to Iran : We had no transactions in 2013 in Iran or any other country subject to comprehensive U.S. economic sanctions, including the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 (the “Iran Threat Reduction Act”), or which would otherwise require disclosure under the Iran Threat Reduction Act.

 

Item 1(d) Financial Information About Geographic Areas .

 

The financial information about geographic areas appearing under the heading “Operating Segments and Geographic Information” in Note 17, located on pages 63 and 64 of the Annual Report, is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 1(e) Available Information.

 

Our Internet address is www.ecolab.com. Copies of our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports

 

16



 

on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these reports, are available free of  charge on our website www.ecolab.com/investor as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

In addition, the following governance materials are available on our web site at www.ecolab.com/investors/corporate-governance: (i) charters of the Audit, Compensation, Finance, Governance and Safety, Health and Environment Committees of our Board of Directors; (ii) our Board’s Corporate Governance Principles; and (iii) our Code of Conduct.

 

Executive Officers of the Registrant .

 

The persons listed in the following table are our current executive officers. Officers are elected annually. There is no family relationship among any of the directors or executive officers, and except as otherwise noted, no executive officer has been involved during the past ten years in any legal proceedings described in applicable Securities and Exchange Commission regulations.

 

Name

 

Age

 

Office

 

Positions Held Since
Jan. 1, 2009

Douglas M. Baker, Jr.

 

55

 

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

 

Dec. 2011 - Present

 

 

 

 

Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer

 

Jan. 2009 – Nov. 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Christophe Beck

 

46

 

Executive Vice President and President – Regions

 

Oct. 2012 - Present

 

 

 

 

Executive Vice President – Global Integration

 

Dec. 2011 – Sep.2012

 

 

 

 

Executive Vice President – Institutional

 

May 2009 – Nov. 2011

 

 

 

 

Senior Vice President and General Manager – Institutional North America Full Service Restaurants

 

Jan. 2009 – Apr. 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Larry L. Berger

 

53

 

Executive Vice President and Chief Technical Officer

 

Oct. 2011 - Present

 

 

 

 

Senior Vice President and Chief Technical Officer

 

Jan. 2009 – Sep.2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alex N. Blanco

 

53

 

Executive Vice President and Chief Supply Chain Officer

 

Jan. 2013 – Present (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John J. Corkrean

 

48

 

Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller

 

Oct. 2011 - Present

 

 

 

 

Vice President and Corporate Controller

 

Apr. 2008 – Sep.2011

 

 

 

 

Vice President and Treasurer

 

Jan. 2009 – Mar. 2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thomas W. Handley

 

59

 

President and Chief Operating Officer

 

Sep. 2012 - Present

 

 

 

 

Senior Executive Vice President and President – Global Food & Beverage and Asia Pacific Latin America

 

Oct. 2011 – Aug.2012

 

 

 

 

President, Global Food & Beverage and APLA Sectors

 

Jan. 2011 – Sep. 2011

 

 

 

 

President, Global Food & Beverage

 

Sep. 2009 – Dec. 2010

 

 

 

 

President – Industrial and Services North America Sector

 

Jan. 2009 – Aug. 2009

 

17



 

Name

 

Age

 

Office

 

Positions Held Since
Jan. 1, 2009

Michael A. Hickey

 

52

 

Executive Vice President and President – Global Institutional

 

Oct. 2012 – Present

 

 

 

 

Executive Vice President and President – Institutional

 

Aug. 2011 – Sep.2012

 

 

 

 

Executive Vice President Global Services Sector

 

Jan. 2011 – Jul. 2011

 

 

 

 

Executive Vice President, Service Sector

 

Jan. 2010 – Dec. 2010

 

 

 

 

Senior Vice President – Global Business Development and General Manager GCS Service

 

Jan. 2009 – Dec. 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Laurie M. Marsh

 

50

 

Executive Vice President – Human Resources

 

Nov. 2013 – Present

 

 

 

 

Vice President – Total Rewards and HR Service Delivery & Technology

 

Dec. 2011 – Oct.2013 (2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Timothy P. Mulhere

 

51

 

Executive Vice President and President – Global Water and Process Services

 

Oct. 2012 – Present

 

 

 

 

Executive Vice President and President – Global Healthcare

 

Feb. 2012 – Sep.2012

 

 

 

 

Senior Vice President and General Manager – Food & Beverage North America

 

Apr. 2009 – Jan. 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Daniel J. Schmechel

 

54

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

Oct. 2012 - Present

 

 

 

 

Senior Vice President – Services and Systems

 

Jun. 2012 – Sep.2012

 

 

 

 

Senior Vice President and Chief Transformation Officer – EMEA

 

Jan. 2009 – May 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

James J. Seifert

 

57

 

Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

 

Oct. 2011 – Present

 

 

 

 

General Counsel & Secretary

 

May 2010 – Sep. 2011(3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stephen M. Taylor

 

52

 

Executive Vice President and President – Nalco Champion

 

Apr. 2013 - Present

 

 

 

 

Executive Vice President and President – Global Energy Services

 

Oct. 2012 – March 2013

 

 

 

 

Executive Vice President – Energy Services

 

Dec. 2011 – Sep.2012 (4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jill S. Wyant

 

42

 

Executive Vice President and President – Global Food & Beverage

 

Oct. 2012 – Present

 

 

 

 

Senior Vice President and General Manager – North America and Latin America

 

Jan. 2012 – Sep. 2012

 

 

 

 

Senior Vice President – Food & Beverage Asia Pacific and Latin America

 

May 2010 – Dec. 2011

 

 

 

 

Vice President – Global Strategic Planning

 

Jun. 2009 – Apr. 2010 (5)

 


(1)          Prior to joining Ecolab in 2013, Mr. Blanco was employed by Procter & Gamble Co., for 30 years, most recently as Vice President, Product Supply Global Beauty Sector.

(2)          Prior to joining Ecolab in 2011 upon the closing of the Nalco merger, Ms. Marsh was employed by Nalco for 20 years, most recently as Executive Vice President of Human Resources.

(3)          Prior to joining Ecolab in 2010, Mr. Seifert was Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Bemis Company, Inc. since 2002.

(4)          Prior to joining Ecolab in 2011 upon closing of the Nalco merger, Mr. Taylor was employed by Nalco for 17 years. Mr. Taylor led Nalco’s Energy Services Division since 2007 after a series of leadership roles in the division.

(5)          Prior to joining Ecolab in 2009, Ms. Wyant held multiple leadership positions at General Electric.

 

18



 

Item 1A. Risk Factors .

 

The following are important factors which could affect our financial performance and could cause our actual results for future periods to differ materially from our anticipated results or other expectations, including those expressed in any forward-looking statements made in this Form 10-K. See the section entitled Forward-Looking Statements located on page 1 of this Form 10-K.

 

We may also refer to this disclosure to identify factors that may cause results to differ from those expressed in other forward-looking statements including those made in oral presentations, including telephone conferences and/or webcasts open to the public.

 

Except as may be required under applicable law, we undertake no duty to update our Forward-Looking Statements.

 

Our results depend upon the continued vitality of the markets we serve :  Economic downturns, and in particular downturns in the energy, foodservice, hospitality, travel, health care, food processing, pulp and paper, mining and steel industries, can adversely impact our end-users.  In recent years, the weak global economic environment, particularly in the United States and Europe, has negatively impacted many of our end-markets. Weak economic activity may continue to adversely affect these markets. During such cycles, these end-users typically reduce their volume of purchases of cleaning and sanitizing products and water treatment and process chemicals, which has had, and may continue to have, an adverse effect on our business.

 

Our results are impacted by general worldwide economic factors:  Economic factors such as the worldwide economy, capital flows, interest rates and currency movements, including, in particular, our exposure to foreign currency risk, have affected our business in the past and may have a material adverse impact on our business in the future.  In 2008 and 2009, the global economy experienced considerable disruption and volatility, and the disruption was particularly acute in the global credit markets.  In 2011 and 2012, the European Union’s sovereign debt crisis negatively impacted economic activity in that region as well as the strength of the euro versus the U.S. dollar.  Other regions of the world, including emerging market areas, also expose us to foreign currency risk.  For example, we do business in Venezuela, which experienced a currency devaluation in 2010 and again in 2013.  Similar currency devaluations, credit market disruptions or other economic turmoil in other countries could have a material adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial position and cash flows by negatively impacting economic activity, including in our key end-markets, and by further weakening the local currency versus the U.S. dollar, resulting in reduced sales and earnings from our foreign operations, which are generated in the local currency, and then translated to U.S. dollars.

 

We may encounter difficulties completing the integration of the Nalco and Champion transactions and fail to fully realize the anticipated benefits of these transactions:   On December 1, 2011, we completed the Nalco merger and on April 10, 2013 we completed the acquisition of Champion.  Following the acquisition of Champion, Ecolab commenced a restructuring plan to integrate the Nalco Global Energy business with Champion to realize acquisition-related cost synergies as well as strengthen and streamline the Company’s position in the fast growing global energy market. Additionally, during 2013, Ecolab combined a Nalco merger restructuring plan commenced in January 2012 with a separate legacy Ecolab restructuring plan commenced in February 2011. The combined plan focuses on global actions related to optimization of the supply chain and office facilities, including reductions of plant and distribution center locations. Potential difficulties that we may encounter as part of the integration activities and restructuring plans, which may preclude us from fully realizing the anticipated benefits of the Nalco and Champion transactions, including expected synergies, include the following:

 

19



 

·                   complexities associated with managing the combined businesses, including the challenge of integrating complex information technology systems, communications systems, financial reporting systems, supply chain and procurement arrangements and other assets of Nalco and Champion in a seamless manner that minimizes any adverse impact on customers, suppliers, employees and other constituencies;

 

·                   the possibility that our businesses may suffer as a result of uncertainty surrounding the impact of the integration on employees and customers;

 

·                   potential unknown liabilities in the legacy Nalco and Champion businesses or arising out of integration of the businesses;

 

·                   unforeseen increased expenses or delays associated with the integration of the various businesses;

 

·                   the inability to successfully combine the businesses of the companies in a manner that permits us to achieve the full revenue and cost synergies anticipated to result from these transactions;

 

·                   problems that may arise in integrating the workforces of the companies, including the possible loss of key employees;

 

·                   potential problems in maintaining and integrating effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting for the combined company; and

 

·                   the disruption of, or the loss of momentum in, our ongoing businesses or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies, any of which could adversely affect our ability to maintain relationships with customers, suppliers, employees and other constituencies or our ability to achieve the anticipated benefits of the transactions or could reduce the combined company’s earnings or otherwise adversely affect the business and financial results of the combined company.

 

We depend on key personnel to lead our business :  Our continued success will largely depend on our ability to attract and retain a high caliber of talent and on the efforts and abilities of our executive officers and certain other key employees, particularly those with sales and sales management responsibilities. This is especially crucial as we continue to integrate Nalco and Champion, which are led by industry veterans that we believe are critical to the success of the integration and the prospects of the business. Our operations could be adversely affected if for any reason such officers or key employees did not remain with us.

 

If we are unsuccessful in executing on key business initiatives, our business could be adversely affected :  In addition to the restructuring plans related to the Nalco and Champion transactions, we continue to make investments and execute business initiatives to develop business systems and optimize our business structure as part of our ongoing efforts to improve our efficiency and returns. In particular, we continue to invest in our ERP systems to integrate and streamline our processes and to improve our competitiveness. These initiatives involve complex business process design and a breakdown in certain of these processes could result in business disruption. If the projects in which we are investing or the initiatives which we are pursuing are not successfully executed, our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows could be adversely affected.

 

We may be subject to information technology system failures, network disruptions and breaches in data security:  We rely to a large extent upon information technology systems and infrastructure to operate our business. The size and complexity of our computer systems make them potentially vulnerable to breakdown, malicious intrusion and random attack.  Recent acquisitions, including the

 

20



 

Nalco and Champion transactions, have resulted in further de-centralization of systems and additional complexity in the system’s infrastructure.  Likewise, data privacy breaches by employees and others with permitted access to our systems may pose a risk that sensitive data may be exposed to unauthorized persons or to the public. While we have invested in protection of data and information technology, there can be no assurance that our efforts will prevent breakdowns or breaches in our systems that could adversely affect our business.

 

Our significant non-U.S. operations expose us to global economic, political and legal risks that could impact our profitability:  We have significant operations outside the United States, including joint ventures and other alliances. We conduct business in approximately 170 countries and, in 2013, approximately 49% of our net sales originated outside the United States. There are inherent risks in our international operations, including:

 

·                   exchange controls and currency restrictions;

 

·                   currency fluctuations and devaluations;

 

·                   tariffs and trade barriers;

 

·                   export duties and quotas;

 

·                   changes in the availability and pricing of raw materials, energy and utilities;

 

·                   changes in local economic conditions;

 

·                   changes in laws and regulations;

 

·                   difficulties in managing international operations and the burden of complying with foreign laws;

 

·                   difficulties in collecting receivables or realizing other assets;

 

·                   requirements to include local ownership or management in our business;

 

·                   exposure to possible expropriation, nationalization or other government actions;

 

·                   restrictions on our ability to repatriate dividends from our subsidiaries;

 

·                   unsettled political conditions, military action, civil unrest, acts of terrorism, force majeure, war or other armed conflict; and

 

·                   countries whose governments have been hostile to U.S.-based businesses.

 

Also, because of uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of laws and regulations and the enforceability of intellectual property and contract rights, we face risks in some countries that our intellectual property rights and contract rights would not be enforced by local governments. We are also periodically faced with the risk of economic uncertainty, which has impacted our business in some countries. Other risks in international business also include difficulties in staffing and managing local operations, including managing credit risk to local customers and distributors.

 

Further, our operations outside the United States require us to comply with a number of United States and international regulations, including anti-corruption laws such as the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, as well as U.S. economic sanctions regulations. We have internal policies and procedures relating to such regulations; however, there is risk that such

 

21



 

policies and procedures will not always protect us from the reckless acts of employees or representatives, particularly in the case of recently acquired operations that may not have significant training in applicable compliance policies and procedures.  Violations of such laws and regulations could result in disruptive investigations of the Company, significant fines and sanctions, which could adversely affect our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

 

Our overall success as a global business depends, in part, upon our ability to succeed in differing economic, social, legal and political conditions. We may not continue to succeed in developing and implementing policies and strategies that are effective in each location where we do business, which could adversely affect our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

 

Our business depends on our ability to comply with laws and governmental regulations, and we may be adversely affected by changes in laws and regulations :  Our business is subject to numerous laws and regulations relating to the environment, including evolving climate change standards, and to the manufacture, storage, distribution, sale and use of our products as well as to the conduct of our business generally, including employment and labor laws. Compliance with these laws and regulations exposes us to potential financial liability and increases our operating costs.  Regulation of our products and operations continues to increase with more stringent standards, causing increased costs of operations and potential for liability if a violation occurs. The potential cost to us relating to environmental and product registration laws and regulations is uncertain due to factors such as the unknown magnitude and type of possible contamination and clean-up costs, the complexity and evolving nature of laws and regulations, and the timing and expense of compliance. Changes to current laws (including tax laws), regulations and policies could impose new restrictions, costs or prohibitions on our current practices which would adversely affect our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

 

We are a defendant in five wage hour lawsuits claiming violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) or a similar state law.  While we have settled two other wage hour cases during the past year, including Doug Ladore v. Ecolab Inc., et al., United States District Court for the Central District of California, case no. CV 11-9386 GAF (FMOx), which was a putative wage hour class action brought on behalf of California Pest Elimination employees, there can be no assurance that other pending or future wage hour lawsuits can be successfully defended or settled.

 

Our subsidiaries are defendants in pending lawsuits alleging negligence and injury resulting from the use of our COREXIT dispersant in response to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, which could expose us to monetary damages or settlement costs: Our subsidiaries were named as defendants in pending lawsuits alleging negligence and injury resulting from the use of our COREXIT dispersant in response to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, which could expose us to monetary damages or settlement costs.  On April 22, 2010, the deepwater drilling platform, the Deepwater Horizon, operated by a subsidiary of BP plc, sank in the Gulf of Mexico after a catastrophic explosion and fire that began on April 20, 2010. A massive oil spill resulted. Approximately one week following the incident, subsidiaries of BP plc, under the authorization of the responding federal agencies, formally requested our indirect subsidiary, Nalco Company, to supply large quantities of COREXIT 9500, a Nalco oil dispersant product listed on the U.S. EPA National Contingency Plan Product Schedule. Nalco Company responded immediately by providing available COREXIT and increasing production to supply the product to BP’s subsidiaries for use, as authorized and directed by agencies of the federal government.

 

Nalco Company and certain affiliates (collectively “Nalco”) was named as a defendant in a series of class action and individual plaintiff lawsuits arising from this event.  The plaintiffs in these matters claimed damages under products liability, tort and other theories. Nalco was also named as a third party defendant in certain matters.  Nalco was indemnified in these matters by another of the defendants.

 

22



 

All but one of these cases have been administratively transferred to a judge in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana with other related cases under In Re: Oil Spill by the Oil Rig “Deepwater Horizon” in the Gulf of Mexico, on April 20, 2010, Case No. 10-md-02179 (E.D. La.) (the “MDL”). The remaining case is Franks v. Sea Tow of South Miss, Inc., et al, Cause No. A2402-10-228 (Circuit Court of Harrison County Mississippi) (the “Remaining Case”).

 

Nalco Company , the incident defendants and the other responder defendants have been named as third party defendants by Transocean Deepwater Drilling, Inc. and its affiliates (the “Transocean Entities”) (In re the Complaint and Petition of Triton Asset Leasing GmbH, et al, MDL No. 2179, Civil Action 10-2771). In April and May 2011, the Transocean Entities, Cameron International Corporation, Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., M-I L.L.C., Weatherford U.S., L.P. and Weatherford International, Inc. (collectively, the “Cross Claimants”) filed cross claims in MDL 2179 against Nalco Company and other unaffiliated cross defendants. The Cross Claimants generally allege, among other things, that if they are found liable for damages resulting from the Deepwater Horizon explosion, oil spill and/or spill response, they are entitled to indemnity or contribution from the cross defendants.

 

On November 28, 2012, the Federal Court in the MDL entered an order dismissing all claims against Nalco.  Because claims remain pending against other defendants, the Court’s decision is not a “final judgment” for purposes of appeal.  Plaintiffs will have 30 days after entry of final judgment to appeal the Court’s decision.  Nalco will request that the Remaining Case be similarly dismissed for the reasons accepted in the MDL.  We cannot predict whether there will be an appeal of the dismissal, the involvement we might have in these matters in the future or the potential for future litigation.  However, if an appeal by plaintiffs in these lawsuits is brought and won, or if the remaining state court case is not dismissed, these suits could have a material adverse affect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

 

Our growth depends upon our ability to successfully compete with respect to value, innovation and customer support :  Our competitive market is made up of numerous global, national, regional and local competitors. Our ability to compete depends in part upon our ability to maintain a superior technological capability and to continue to identify, develop and commercialize innovative, high value-added products for niche applications. There can be no assurance that we will be able to accomplish this or that technological developments by our competitors will not place certain of our products at a competitive disadvantage in the future. In addition, certain of the new products that we have under development will be offered in markets in which we do not currently compete, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully in those new markets. If we fail to introduce new technologies on a timely basis, we may lose market share and our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows could be adversely affected.

 

Our results can be adversely affected by difficulties in securing the supply of certain raw materials or by fluctuations in the cost of raw materials :  The prices of raw materials used in our business can fluctuate from time to time, and in recent years we have experienced periods of increased raw material costs. Changes in raw material prices, unavailability of adequate and reasonably priced raw materials or substitutes for those raw materials, or the inability to obtain or renew supply agreements on favorable terms can adversely affect our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows. In addition, volatility and disruption in economic activity and conditions could disrupt or delay the performance of our suppliers and thus impact our ability to obtain raw materials at favorable prices or on favorable terms, which may adversely affect our business.

 

We have substantial indebtedness which will impact our financial flexibility: As of December 31, 2013, we had net debt (total debt minus cash and cash equivalents) of $6.6 billion.  Our substantial indebtedness may adversely affect our business, consolidated results of operations and financial position including in the following respects:

 

23



 

·                   requiring us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flows to debt service obligations, thereby potentially reducing the availability of cash flows to pay cash dividends and to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, investments and other general operating requirements and opportunities;

 

·                   limiting our ability to obtain additional financing to fund our working capital requirements, capital expenditures, acquisitions, investments, debt service obligations and other general operating requirements;

 

·                   placing us at a relative competitive disadvantage compared to competitors that have less debt;

 

·                   limiting flexibility to plan for, or react to, changes in the businesses and industries in which we operate, which may adversely affect our operating results and ability to meet our debt service obligations; and

 

·                   increasing our vulnerability to adverse general economic and industry conditions.

 

In addition, approximately $1.16 billion of our debt is floating rate debt.  A one percentage point increase in the average interest rate on our floating rate debt would increase future interest expense by approximately $11.6 million per year.  Accordingly a significant spike in interest rates would adversely affect our consolidated results of operations and cash flows.

 

If we incur additional indebtedness, the risks related to our substantial indebtedness may intensify.

 

If we are unsuccessful in integrating acquisitions, our business could be adversely affected : As part of our long-term strategy, we seek to acquire complementary businesses. There can be no assurance that we will find attractive acquisition candidates or succeed at effectively managing the integration of acquired businesses into existing businesses. If the underlying business performance of such acquired businesses deteriorates, the expected synergies from such transactions do not materialize or we fail to successfully integrate new businesses into our existing businesses, our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows could be adversely affected.

 

We enter into multi-year contracts with customers that can impact our results :   Our multi-year contracts with some of our customers include terms affecting our pricing flexibility. There can be no assurance that these restraints will not have an adverse impact on our margins and consolidated results of operations.

 

Consolidation of our customers and vendors can affect our results :  Customers and vendors in the foodservice, hospitality, travel, healthcare, food processing and pulp and paper industries as well as other industries we serve have consolidated in recent years and that trend may continue. This consolidation could have an adverse impact on our ability to retain customers and on our margins and consolidated results of operations.

 

Severe public health outbreaks may adversely impact our business :  Our business could be adversely affected by the effect of a public health epidemic.  The United States and other countries have experienced, and may experience in the future, public health outbreaks such as Avian Flu, SARS and H1N1 influenza.  A prolonged occurrence of a contagious disease such as these could result in a significant downturn in the foodservice, hospitality and travel industries and also may result in health or other government authorities imposing restrictions on travel further impacting our end markets.  Any of these events could result in a significant drop in demand for some of our products and services and adversely affect our business.

 

We incur significant expenses related to the amortization of intangible assets and may be required to report losses resulting from the impairment of goodwill or other assets recorded in connection with the Nalco and Champion transactions and other acquisitions: Ecolab expects to

 

24



 

continue to complete selected acquisitions and joint venture transactions in the future. In connection with acquisition and joint venture transactions, applicable accounting rules generally require the tangible and intangible assets of the acquired business to be recorded on the balance sheet of the acquiring company at their fair values. Intangible assets other than goodwill are required to be amortized over their estimated useful lives and this expense may be significant. Any excess in the purchase price paid by the acquiring company over the fair value of tangible and intangible assets of the acquired business is recorded as goodwill.  If it is later determined that the anticipated future cash flows from the acquired business may be less than the carrying values of the assets and goodwill of the acquired business, the assets or goodwill may be deemed to be impaired. In this case, the acquiring company may be required under applicable accounting rules to write down the value of the assets or goodwill on its balance sheet to reflect the extent of the impairment. This write-down of assets or goodwill is generally recognized as a non-cash expense in the statement of operations of the acquiring company for the accounting period during which the write down occurs. As of December 31, 2013, we had goodwill of $6.9 billion which is maintained in various reporting units, including goodwill from the Nalco and Champion transactions which resulted in the addition of $4.5 billion and $1.0 billion of goodwill, respectively.  If we determine that any of the assets or goodwill recorded in connection with the Nalco and Champion transactions or any other prior or future acquisitions or joint venture transactions have become impaired, we will be required to record a loss resulting from the impairment. Impairment losses could be significant and could adversely affect our consolidated results of operations and financial position.

 

Future events may impact our deferred tax position, including the utilization of foreign tax credits and undistributed earnings of international affiliates that are considered to be reinvested indefinitely:   We evaluate the recoverability of deferred tax assets and the need for deferred tax liabilities based on available evidence. This process involves significant management judgment about assumptions that are subject to change from period to period based on changes in tax laws or variances between future projected operating performance and actual results. We are required to establish a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets if we determine, based on available evidence at the time the determination is made, that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In making this determination, we evaluate all positive and negative evidence as of the end of each reporting period. Future adjustments (either increases or decreases), to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance are determined based upon changes in the expected realization of the net deferred tax assets. The realization of the deferred tax assets ultimately depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income in either the carry-back or carry-forward periods under the tax law. Due to significant estimates used to establish the valuation allowance and the potential for changes in facts and circumstances, it is reasonably possible that we will be required to record adjustments to the valuation allowance in future reporting periods. Changes to the valuation allowance or the amount of deferred tax liabilities could adversely affect our consolidated results of operations or financial position.  Further, should the Company change its assertion regarding the permanent reinvestment of the undistributed earnings of international affiliates, a deferred tax liability may need to be established.

 

A chemical spill or release could adversely impact our business :  As a manufacturer and supplier of chemical products, there is a potential for chemicals to be accidentally spilled, released or discharged, either in liquid or gaseous form, during production, transportation or use.  Such a release could result in environmental contamination as well as a human or animal health hazard.  Accordingly, such a release could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

 

Extraordinary events may significantly impact our business :  The occurrence of (a) litigation or claims, (b) the loss or insolvency of a major customer or distributor, (c) war (including acts of terrorism or hostilities which impact our markets), (d) natural or manmade disasters, (e) water shortages or (f) severe weather conditions affecting the foodservice, hospitality and travel industries may have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

25



 

Defense of litigation, particularly certain types of actions such as antitrust, patent infringement, wage hour and class action lawsuits, can be costly and time consuming even if ultimately successful, and if not successful could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

 

While we have a diverse customer base and no customer or distributor constitutes 10 percent or more of our consolidated revenues, we do have customers and independent, third-party distributors, the loss of which could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations or cash flows for the affected earnings periods; however, we consider it unlikely that such an event would have a material adverse effect on our financial position.

 

War (including acts of terrorism or hostilities), natural or manmade disasters, water shortages or severe weather conditions affecting the energy, foodservice, hospitality, travel, health care, food processing, pulp and paper, mining, steel and other industries cause a downturn in the business of our customers, which in turn can have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

 

Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments .

 

We have no unresolved comments from the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Item 2.  Properties .

 

Our manufacturing philosophy is to manufacture products wherever an economic, process or quality assurance advantage exists or where proprietary manufacturing techniques dictate in-house production. Currently, most products that we sell are manufactured at our facilities.  We position our manufacturing locations and warehouses in a manner to permit ready access to our customers.

 

Our manufacturing facilities produce chemical products as well as medical devices and equipment for all of our businesses, although the businesses constituting the Other segment purchase the majority of their products and equipment from outside suppliers.  Our chemical production process consists of producing intermediates via basic reaction chemistry and subsequently blending and packaging those intermediates with other purchased raw materials into finished products in powder, solid and liquid form.  Our devices and equipment manufacturing operations consist of producing chemical product dispensers and injectors and other mechanical equipment, medical devices, dishwasher racks, related sundries, dish machine refurbishment and water monitoring and maintenance equipment system from purchased components and subassemblies.

 

The following table profiles our more significant physical properties with approximately 70,000 square feet or more with ongoing production activities. In general, manufacturing facilities located in the United States serve our U.S. markets and facilities located outside of the United States serve our International markets. However, certain of these United States facilities do manufacture products for export and are marked with an asterisk (*).

 

PLANT PROFILES

 

Location

 

Approximate
Size (Sq. Ft.)

 

Segment

 

Majority
Owned or
Leased

Joliet, IL USA*

 

610,000

 

Global Institutional, Global Industrial

 

Owned

Tai Cang, CHINA

 

450,000

 

Global Institutional

 

Owned

Sugar Land, TX USA

 

350,000

 

Global Energy, Global Industrial

 

Owned

South Beloit, IL USA *

 

313,000

 

Global Institutional, Global Industrial, Other

 

Owned

 

26



 

Location

 

Approximate
Size (Sq. Ft.)

 

Segment

 

Majority
Owned or
Leased

Chalons, FRANCE

 

280,000

 

Global Institutional

 

Owned

Clearing, IL USA

 

270,000

 

Global Energy, Global Industrial

 

Owned

Garland, TX USA *

 

239,000

 

Global Institutional, Global Industrial

 

Owned

Martinsburg, WV USA*

 

228,000

 

Global Institutional, Global Industrial

 

Owned

Elwood City, PA USA

 

222,000

 

Global Energy, Global Industrial

 

Owned

Weavergate, UNITED KINGDOM

 

222,000

 

Global Industrial

 

Owned

Greensboro, NC USA

 

193,000

 

Global Institutional

 

Owned

Fresno, TX USA

 

192,000

 

Global Energy

 

Owned

Nieuwegein, NETHERLANDS

 

168,000

 

Global Institutional

 

Owned

Anaco, VENEZUELA

 

161,000

 

Global Energy, Global Industrial

 

Owned

La Romana, DOMINICAN REPUBLIC

 

160,000

 

Global Institutional

 

Leased

Tessenderlo, BELGIUM

 

153,000

 

Global Institutional

 

Owned

Cheltenham, AUSTRALIA

 

145,000

 

Global Institutional

 

Owned

Suzano, BRAZIL

 

142,000

 

Global Energy, Global Industrial

 

Owned

McDonough, GA USA *

 

141,000

 

Global Institutional, Global Industrial

 

Owned

Darra, AUSTRALIA

 

138,000

 

Global Institutional, Global Industrial

 

Owned

Corsicana, TX USA

 

137,000

 

Global Energy

 

Owned

Burlington , Ontario, CANADA

 

136,000

 

Global Energy, Global Industrial

 

Owned

Eagan, MN USA *

 

133,000

 

Global Institutional, Global Industrial, Other

 

Owned

Huntington, IN USA *

 

127,000

 

Global Institutional, Global Industrial

 

Owned

Rozzano, ITALY

 

126,000

 

Global Institutional

 

Owned

City of Industry, CA USA

 

125,000

 

Global Institutional, Global Industrial

 

Owned

Garyville, LA USA

 

122,000

 

Global Energy, Global Industrial

 

Owned

Mississauga, CANADA

 

120,000

 

Global Institutional, Global Industrial

 

Leased

Aberdeen, UNITED KINGDOM

 

118,000

 

Global Energy

 

Owned

Elk Grove Village, IL USA *

 

115,000

 

Global Institutional

 

Leased

Nanjing, CHINA

 

112,000

 

Global Energy, Global Industrial

 

Owned

Biebesheim, GERMANY

 

109,000

 

Global Energy, Global Industrial

 

Owned

Fort Worth, TX USA

 

101,000

 

Global Institutional

 

Leased

Johannesburg, SOUTH AFRICA

 

100,000

 

Global Institutional

 

Owned

Botany, AUSTRALIA

 

100,000

 

Global Institutional, Global Industrial

 

Owned

Hamilton, NEW ZEALAND

 

96,000

 

Global Institutional

 

Owned

Calgary, Alberta, CANADA

 

94,000

 

Global Energy

 

Owned

Revesby, AUSTRALIA

 

87,000

 

Global Institutional, Global Industrial

 

Owned

Yangsan, KOREA

 

85,000

 

Global Energy, Global Industrial

 

Owned

Kwinana, AUSTRALIA

 

87,000

 

Global Institutional, Global Industrial

 

Owned

Cisterna, ITALY

 

80,000

 

Global Industrial

 

Owned

Rovigo, ITALY

 

77,000

 

Global Institutional

 

Owned

Cuautitlan, MEXICO

 

76,000

 

Global Institutional, Global Industrial

 

Owned

Barueri, BRAZIL

 

75,000

 

Global Institutional, Global Industrial

 

Leased

Mullingar, IRELAND

 

74,000

 

Global Institutional

 

Leased

Mosta, MALTA

 

73,000

 

Global Institutional

 

Leased

 

27



 

Generally, our manufacturing facilities are adequate to meet our existing in-house production needs.  We continue to invest in our plant sites to maintain viable operations and to add capacity as necessary to meet business imperatives. A new leased facility on Jurong Island Singapore is expected to be completed in 2014 and will primarily serve our Global Energy segment.

 

Most of our manufacturing plants also serve as distribution centers. In addition, we operate distribution centers around the world, most of which are leased, and utilize third party logistics service providers to facilitate the distribution of our products and services.

 

Ecolab’s corporate headquarters is comprised of three adjacent multi-storied buildings located in downtown St. Paul, Minnesota. The main 19-story building was constructed to our specifications and is leased through June 30, 2018. Thereafter, it is subject to multiple renewals at our option. The second building is leased through 2019 with additional options available. The third building is owned. The corporate headquarters includes an employee training center. A 90 acre campus in Eagan, Minnesota is owned and provides for future growth. The Eagan facility houses a significant research and development center, a data center and training facilities as well as several of our administrative functions.

 

We also have a significant business presence in Naperville, Illinois, where our Global Water and Global Paper business units maintain their principal administrative offices and research center.  These facilities are leased.  Our Global Energy business maintains administrative and research facilities in Sugar Land, Texas and additional research facilities in Fresno, Texas.  Additionally, the business leases administrative space in Houston, Texas.  In December 2013, we announced the construction of a new 133,000 square-foot headquarters building adjacent to the existing Sugar Land operations scheduled for completion in late 2015 and renovation of the existing 45,000 square-foot research facilities in Sugar Land.  The administrative and research development and engineering employees from Houston and Fresno will relocate to the new facilities upon completion.  Significant regional administrative and/or research facilities are located in  Leiden, Netherlands, Campinas, Brazil, and Pune, India, which we own, and in Monheim, Germany,  Singapore,  Shanghai, China, and Zurich, Switzerland, which we lease.  We also have a network of small leased sales offices in the United States and, to a lesser extent, in other parts of the world.

 

Item 3. Legal Proceedings .

 

Note 15, entitled “Commitments and Contingencies” located on pages 56 through 58 of the Annual Report, is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Other matters arising under laws relating to protection of the environment are discussed at Item 1(c) above, under the heading “Environmental and Regulatory Considerations.”

 

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

 

Not applicable.

 

28



 

PART II

 

Item 5.  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities .

 

Market Information : Our Common Stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “ECL.” The Common Stock is also traded on an unlisted basis on certain other United States exchanges. The high and low sales prices of our Common Stock on the consolidated transaction reporting system during 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Quarter

 

High

 

Low

 

High

 

Low

 

First

 

$

  80.69

 

$

  71.99

 

$

  62.86

 

$

  57.44

 

Second

 

$

  89.47

 

$

  78.74

 

$

  68.55

 

$

  59.81

 

Third

 

$

  99.45

 

$

  85.48

 

$

  68.96

 

$

  61.66

 

Fourth

 

$

108.34

 

$

  96.44

 

$

  72.79

 

$

  63.42

 

 

The closing Common Stock price on the New York Stock Exchange on January 31, 2014 was $100.54.

 

Holders :  On January 31, 2014, we had 7,304 holders of Common Stock of record.

 

Dividends :  We have paid Common Stock dividends for 77 consecutive years. Quarterly cash dividends of $0.20 per share were declared in February, May and August 2012. Cash dividends of $0.23 per share were declared in December 2012, and February, May and August 2013. A dividend of $0.275 per share was declared in December 2013.

 

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities :

 

Period

 

(a)
Total number of
shares purchased(1)

 

(b)
Average price paid
per share (2)

 

(c)
Number of shares
purchased as part of
publicly announced
plans or programs(3)

 

(d)
Maximum number of
shares that may yet be
purchased under the
plans or programs(3)

 

October 1-31, 2013

 

115,392

 

$

100.5283

 

113,475

 

13,321,092

 

November 1-30, 2013

 

211,950

 

$

106.5850

 

210,160

 

13,110,932

 

December 1-31, 2013

 

429,059

 

$

104.7749

 

397,300

 

12,713,632

 

Total

 

756,401

 

$

104.6343

 

720,935

 

12,713,632

 

 


(1)                    Includes 35,466 shares reacquired from employees and/or directors to satisfy the exercise price of stock options or shares surrendered to satisfy minimum statutory tax obligations under our stock incentive plans.

 

(2)                    The average price paid per share includes brokerage commissions associated with publicly announced plan purchases plus the value of such other reacquired shares.

 

(3)                    As announced on May 5, 2011, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 15,000,000 shares of Common Stock, including shares to be repurchased under Rule 10b5-1.  As announced on August 23, 2011, the Finance Committee, via delegation by our Board of Directors, authorized the repurchase of up to an additional 10,000,000 shares contingent upon completion of the merger with Nalco.  On September 6, 2011, the Company announced a $1 billion share repurchase program under the existing Board authorizations.  The $1 billion share repurchase program was completed in December 2013.  We intend to repurchase all shares under these authorizations, for which no expiration date has been established, in open market or privately negotiated transactions, subject to market conditions.

 

29



 

Item 6.  Selected Financial Data .

 

The comparative data for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009 inclusive, which are set forth under the heading entitled “Summary Operating and Financial Data” located on pages 68 and 69 of the Annual Report, are incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations .

 

The material appearing under the heading entitled “Management’s Discussion & Analysis,” located on pages 11 through 30 of the Annual Report, is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk .

 

The material appearing under the headings entitled “Market Risk” and “Global Environment” located on page 28 of the Annual Report is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data .

 

The financial statements and material which are an integral part of the financial statements listed under Item 15(a)(1) below and located on pages 31 through 69 of the Annual Report, are incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure .

 

None.

 

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures .

 

Disclosure Controls and Procedures : As of December 31, 2013, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended). Based upon that evaluation, our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

 

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting : Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.  Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the 1992 framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under this framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2013.

 

On April 10, 2013, the Company completed its acquisition of privately held Champion (See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information).  As permitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, companies may exclude acquisitions from their assessment of internal controls over financial reporting during the first year of acquisition and management elected to exclude Champion from its assessment of internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013.  Champion’s total assets and total revenues represent approximately 4% and 8%, respectively, of the

 

30



 

related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013.

 

The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, has audited the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013. Their report, and our management reports, can be found in our Annual Report, the relevant portion of which has been filed as Exhibit (13.1) to this Form 10-K and is incorporated into Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

 

During the period October 1 - December 31, 2013 there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

PART III

 

Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers of the Registrant and Corporate Governance .

 

Information about our directors is incorporated by reference from the discussion under the heading “Proposal 1: Election of Directors” located in the Proxy Statement. Information about compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is incorporated by reference from the discussion under the heading “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” located in the Proxy Statement. Information about our Audit Committee, including the members of the Committee, and our Audit Committee financial experts, is incorporated by reference from the discussion under the heading “Corporate Governance,” and sub-headings “Board Committees” and “Audit Committee,” located in the Proxy Statement. Information about our Code of Conduct is incorporated by reference from the discussion under the heading “Corporate Governance Materials and Code of Conduct” located in the Proxy Statement.  Information regarding our executive officers is presented under the heading “Executive Officers of the Registrant” in Part I on pages 17 and 18 of this Form 10-K, and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 11. Executive Compensation .

 

Information appearing under the headings entitled “Executive Compensation” and “Director Compensation” located in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference. However, pursuant to Instructions to Item 407(e)(5) of Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-K, the material appearing under the sub-heading “Compensation Committee Report” shall not be deemed to be “filed” with the Commission.

 

Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters .

 

Information appearing under the heading entitled “Security Ownership” located in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.  Information appearing under the heading entitled “Equity Compensation Plan Information” located in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

 

A total of 804,158 shares of Common Stock held by our directors and executive officers, some of whom may be deemed to be “affiliates” of the Company, have been excluded from the computation of market value of our Common Stock on the cover page of this Form 10-K. This total represents that portion of the shares reported as beneficially owned by our directors and executive officers as of June 30, 2013 which are actually issued and outstanding.

 

31



 

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence .

 

Information appearing under the headings entitled “Director Independence Standards and Determinations” and “Related Person Transactions” located in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 14.  Principal Accounting Fees and Services .

 

Information appearing under the heading entitled “Audit Fees” located in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

 

32



 

PART IV

 

Item 15.  Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules .

 

(a)(1)

The following financial statements of the Company, included in the Annual Report, are incorporated into Item 8 hereof.

 

 

 

 

(i)

Consolidated Statement of Income for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, Annual Report page 31.

 

 

 

 

(ii)

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, Annual Report page 32.

 

 

 

 

(iii)

Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2013 and 2012, Annual Report page 33.

 

 

 

 

(iv)

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, Annual Report page 34.

 

 

 

 

(v)

Consolidated Statement of Equity for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, Annual Report page 35.

 

 

 

 

(vi)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Annual Report pages 36 through 66.

 

 

 

 

(vii)

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, Annual Report page 67.

 

 

 

(b)(2)

All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.  All significant majority-owned subsidiaries are included in the filed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

 

The following documents are filed as exhibits to this Report.  We will, upon request and payment of a fee not exceeding the rate at which copies are available from the Securities and Exchange Commission, furnish copies of any of the following exhibits to stockholders.

 

 

 

 

(2.1)

Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of July 19, 2011, among Ecolab Inc., Sustainability Partners Corporation and Nalco Holding Company — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (2.1) of our Form 8-K dated July 19, 2011. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

(2.2)

Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 11, 2012, among Ecolab Inc., OFC Technologies Corp. and Permian Mud Service, Inc. — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (2.1) of our Form 8-K dated October 12, 2012. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

(2.3)

First Amendment dated as of November 28, 2012 to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 11, 2012, among Ecolab Inc., OFC Technologies Corp. and Permian Mud Service, Inc. — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (2.3) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2012. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

(2.4)

Second Amendment dated as of November 30, 2012 to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as October 11, 2012, among Ecolab Inc., OFC Technologies Corp. and Permian Mud Service, Inc. — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (2.1) of our Form 8-K dated November 30, 2012. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

(2.5)

Third Amendment dated as of December 28, 2012 to Agreement and Plan of Merger,

 

33



 

 

 

dated as of October 11, 2012, among Ecolab Inc., OFC Technologies Corp. and Permian Mud Services, Inc. — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (2.4) of our Form 8-K dated April 10, 2013. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

(2.6)

Fourth Amendment dated as of April 10, 2013 to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 11, 2012, among Ecolab Inc., OFC Technologies Corp. and Permian Mud Services, Inc. — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (2.5) of our Form 8-K dated April 10, 2013. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

(3.1)

Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Ecolab Inc., dated as of January 2, 2013 — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (3.2) of our Form 8-K dated January 2, 2013. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

(3.2)

By-Laws, as amended through February 26, 2010 — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (3.2) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2011. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

(4.1)

Common Stock - see Exhibits (3.1) and (3.2).

 

 

 

 

(4.2)

Form of Common Stock Certificate effective January 2, 2013 — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4.2) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2012. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

(4.3)

Amended and Restated Indenture, dated as of January 9, 2001, between Ecolab Inc. and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. (as successor in interest to J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association and Bank One, NA) as Trustee - Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4)(A) of our Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 23, 2001. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

(4.4)

Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 8, 2008, between Ecolab Inc. and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4.2) of our Form 8-K dated February 8, 2008. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

(4.5)

Form of 4.875% Note due February 15, 2015 — Included in Exhibit (4.4) above.

 

 

 

 

(4.6)

Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 8, 2011, between the Company, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (formerly known as The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as successor in interest to J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association and Bank One, National Association), as original trustee — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4.2) of our Form 8-K dated December 5, 2011. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

(4.7)

Forms of 2.375% Notes due 2014 Notes, 3.000% Notes due 2016, 4.350% Notes due 2021 and 5.500% Notes due 2041 — Included in Exhibit (4.6) above.

 

 

 

 

(4.8)

Third Supplement Indenture, dated as of August 9, 2012, between The Company, Wells Fargo Bank National Association, as Trustee and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (formerly known as The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as successor in interest to J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association and Bank One, National Associated as original trustee — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4.1) of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

(4.9)

Form of 1.000% Note due August 9, 2015 — Included in Exhibit (4.8) above.

 

 

 

 

(4.10)

Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 13, 2012, between The Company, Wells Fargo Bank National Association, as Trustee and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (formerly known as The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as successor in interest to J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association and Bank One, National Associated as original trustee — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4.2) of our

 

34



 

 

 

Form 8-K dated December 13, 2012. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

(4.11)

Form of 1.450% Note due December 8, 2017 — Included in Exhibit (4.10) above.

 

Copies of other constituent instruments defining the rights of holders of our long-term debt are not filed herewith, pursuant to Section (b)(4)(iii) of Item 601 of Regulation S-K, because the aggregate amount of securities authorized under each of such instruments is less than 10% of our total assets on a consolidated basis.  We will, upon request by the Securities and Exchange Commission, furnish to the Commission a copy of each such instrument.

 

 

 

 

(10.1)

$1.5 billion 5-Year Revolving Credit Facility, dated as of September 8, 2011, among Ecolab Inc., the lenders party thereto, the issuing banks party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and Swingline Bank, and Citibank, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., as co-syndication agents — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.2) of our Form 8-K dated September 8, 2011. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

(10.2)

First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement dated July 26, 2006, dated as of October 27, 2011, by and among Ecolab Inc. and the Noteholders party thereto — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.2) of our Form 8-K dated October 27, 2011. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

(10.3)

Note Purchase Agreement dated October 27, 2011, by and among Ecolab Inc. and the Purchasers party thereto — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.1) of our Form 8-K dated October 27, 2011. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

(10.4)

Documents comprising global Commercial Paper Programs

 

(i)             U.S. $200,000,000 Euro-Commercial Paper Programme

 

(a)        Amended and Restated Dealer Agreement dated 2 December 2005 between Ecolab Inc. (as Guarantor), Ecolab B.V. and Ecolab Holding GmbH (as Issuers), Ecolab Inc., Credit Suisse First Boston (Europe) Limited (as Arranger), and Citibank International plc and Credit Suisse First Boston (Europe) Limited (as Dealers) — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)B(i)(a) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2005. (File No. 001-9328)

 

(b)        Amended and Restated Note Agency Agreement dated as of 2 December 2005 between Ecolab Inc., Ecolab B.V. and Ecolab Holding GmbH (as Issuers) and Citibank, N.A. as Issue and Paying Agent — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)B(i)(b) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2005. (File No. 001-9328)

 

(c)         Deed of Covenant made on 2 December 2005 by Ecolab Inc., Ecolab B.V. and Ecolab Holding GmbH — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)B(i)(c) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2005. (File No. 001-9328)

 

(d)        Deed of Guarantee made on 2 December 2005 — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)B(i)(d) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2005. (File No. 001-9328)

 

(ii)            U.S. $1,500,000,000 U.S. Commercial Paper Program

 

(a)        Form of Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement for 4 (2) Program.  The dealers for the program are Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and RBS

 

35



 

 

 

Securities Inc.  — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)A(ii)(a) of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003. (File No. 001-9328)

 

(b)        Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement dated as of July 10, 2000 between Ecolab Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (as successor to Bank One, National Association) as Issuing and Paying Agent - Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)A(ii)(b) of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003. (File No. 001-9328)

 

(c)         Corporate Commercial Paper — Master Note dated July 10, 2000 — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.5)(ii)(c) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2011. (File No. 001-9328)

 

(d)        Annex to Corporate Commercial Paper — Master Note dated July 10, 2000 effective January 9, 2012 — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.5)(ii)(d) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2011. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

(10.5)

$900 million Term Loan Agreement, dated as of November 15, 2012, among Ecolab Inc., the lenders party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as sole lead arranger — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.1) of our Form 8-K dated November 15, 2012. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

(10.6)

(i)             Ecolab Inc. 2001 Non-Employee Director Stock Option and Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective August 1, 2013.

 

(ii)            Master Agreement Relating to Options (as in effect through May 7, 2004) — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)D(i) of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004. (File No. 001-9328)

 

(iii)           Master Agreement Relating to Periodic Options, as amended effective as of May 1, 2004 — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)D(ii) of our Form  10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004. (File No. 001-9328)

 

(iv)           Amendment No. 1 to Master Agreement Relating to Periodic Options, as amended effective May 2, 2008 — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)B of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

(10.7)

(i)             Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 26, 2006 by and among Ecolab Inc. and the Purchasers party thereto — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10) of our Form 8-K dated July 26, 2006. (File No. 001-9328)

 

(ii)            First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement dated July 26, 2006, dated as of October 27, 2011, by and among Ecolab Inc. and the Noteholders party thereto — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.2) of our Form 8-K dated October 27, 2011. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

(10.8)

Form of Director Indemnification Agreement.  Substantially identical agreements are in effect as to each of our directors — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)I of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2003.  (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

(10.9)

(i)             Ecolab Executive Death Benefits Plan, as amended and restated effective March 1, 1994 — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)H(i) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2006. See also Exhibit (10.14) hereof.  (File No. 001-9328)

 

(ii)            Amendment No. 1 to Ecolab Executive Death Benefits Plan, effective July 1, 1997  — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)H(ii) of our Form 10-K Annual

 

36



 

 

 

Report for the year ended December 31, 1998.  (File No. 001-9328)

 

(iii)           Second Declaration of Amendment to Ecolab Executive Death Benefits Plan, effective March 1, 1998 - Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)H(iii) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 1998. (File No. 001-9328)

 

(iv)           Amendment No. 3 to the Ecolab Executive Death Benefits Plan, effective August 12, 2005 — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)B of our Form 8-K dated December 13, 2005. (File No. 001-9328)

 

(v)            Amendment No. 4 to the Ecolab Executive Death Benefits Plan, effective January 1, 2005 — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)H(v) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2009. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

(10.10)

Ecolab Executive Long-Term Disability Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 1994 — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)I of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2004. (File No. 001-9328) See also Exhibit (10.14) hereof.

 

 

 

 

(10.11)

Ecolab Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (As Amended and Restated effective as of January 1, 2014).  See also Exhibit (10.14) hereof.

 

 

 

 

(10.12)

Ecolab Mirror Savings Plan (As Amended and Restated effective as of January 1, 2014).  See also Exhibit (10.14) hereof.

 

 

 

 

(10.13)

Ecolab Mirror Pension Plan (As Amended and Restated effective as of January 1, 2014).  See also Exhibit (10.14) hereof.

 

 

 

 

(10.14)

(i)             Ecolab Inc. Administrative Document for Non-Qualified Plans (Amended and Restated effective as of January 1, 2011) — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.16) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2011. (File No. 001-9328)

 

(ii)            Amendment No. 1 to the Ecolab Inc. Administrative Document for Non-Qualified Plans effective as of January 1, 2013.

 

 

 

 

(10.15)

Ecolab Inc. Management Performance Incentive Plan, as amended and restated on February 27, 2009 — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10) of our Form 8-K dated May 8, 2009.  (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

(10.16)

(i)             Ecolab Inc. Change in Control Severance Compensation Policy, as amended and restated effective February 26, 2010 — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10) of our Form 8-K dated February 26, 2010. (File No. 001-9328)

 

(ii)            Amendment No. 1 to Ecolab Inc. Change-in-Control Severance Policy (as Amended and Restated effective as of February 26, 2010) — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.18)(ii) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2011.

 

 

 

 

(10.17)

Description of Ecolab Management Incentive Plan — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)Q of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2008. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

(10.18)

(i)             Ecolab Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10) of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002. (File No. 001-9328)

 

(ii)            Non-Statutory Stock Option Agreement as in effect for grants beginning May 11, 2002 through August 12, 2003 — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)A(i) of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004. (File No. 001-9328)

 

37



 

 

 

(iii)           Non-statutory Stock Option Agreement as in effect for grants beginning August 13, 2003 — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)A(ii) of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

(10.19)

(i)             Ecolab Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)A of our Form 8-K dated May 6, 2005. (File No. 001-9328)

 

(ii)            Amendment No. 1 to Ecolab Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, adopted October 31, 2008 — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)V(ii) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2008. (File No. 001-9328)

 

(iii)           Sample form of Non-Statutory Stock Option Agreement under the Ecolab Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan in effect for grants prior to October 31, 2008 — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)B of our Form 8-K dated May 6, 2005. (File No. 001-9328)

 

(iv)           Sample form of Non-Statutory Stock Option Agreement under the Ecolab Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan in effect for grants after October 31, 2008 — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)V(iv) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2008. (File No. 001-9328)

 

(v)            Sample form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Ecolab Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)W(iii) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2006. (File No. 001-9328)

 

(vi)           Sample form of Performance Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the Ecolab Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10) of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

(10.20)

(i)             Ecolab Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective May 2, 2013 — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.1) of our Form 8-K dated May 2, 2013. (File No. 001-9328)

 

(ii)            Sample form of Non-Statutory Stock Option Agreement under the Ecolab Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive Plan — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)B of our Form 8-K dated May 6, 2010. (File No. 001-9328)

 

(iii)           Sample form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)C of our Form 8-K dated May 6, 2010. (File No. 001-9328)

 

(iv)           Sample form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Ecolab Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive Plan — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)D of our Form 8-K dated May 6, 2010. (File No. 001-9328)

 

(v)            Sample form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the Ecolab Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive Plan — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)A of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

(10.21)

Policy on Reimbursement of Incentive Payments adopted December 4, 2008 — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)W of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2008. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

(10.22)

Second Amended and Restated Nalco Holding Company 2004 Stock Incentive Plan — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4.3) of our Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form S-8 to Form S-4 Registration Statement dated December 2, 2011. (File No. 001-9328)

 

38



 

 

(10.23)

Form of Nalco Company Death Benefit Agreement and Addendum to Death Benefit Agreement — Incorporated by reference from Exhibit (99.2) on Form 8-K of Nalco Holding Company filed on May 11, 2005. (File No. 001-32342)

 

 

 

 

(10.24)

Sublease Agreement, dated as of November 4, 2003 between Leo Holding Company, as sub-landlord and Ondeo Nalco Company, as subtenant — Incorporated by reference from Exhibit (10.6) of the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of Nalco Company filed on May 17, 2004. (File No. 333-115560)

 

 

 

 

(13.1)

Those portions of our Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2013 which are incorporated by reference into Parts I and II hereof.

 

 

 

 

(14.1)

Ecolab Code of Conduct, as amended November 29, 2012 — Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (14.1) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2012. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

(21.1)

List of Subsidiaries.

 

 

 

 

(23.1)

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm at page 42 hereof is filed as a part hereof.

 

 

 

 

(24.1)

Powers of Attorney.

 

 

 

 

(31.1)

Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications.

 

 

 

 

(32.1)

Section 1350 Certifications.

 

 

 

 

(99.1)

Exhibit (99.1) of our Form 8-K filed on April 27, 2012 — Incorporated by reference to unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of income for the twelve-months ended December 31, 2011 and corresponding footnotes included as part of Exhibit (99.1) of our Form 8-K filed on April 27, 2012. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

(101.1)

Interactive Data File.

 

39



 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PLANS AND ARRANGEMENTS

 

Included in the preceding list of exhibits are the following management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements:

 

Exhibit No.

 

Description

 

 

 

(10.6)

 

Ecolab Inc. 2001 Non-Employee Director Stock Option and Deferred Compensation Plan.

 

 

 

(10.8)

 

Form of Director Indemnification Agreement.

 

 

 

(10.9)

 

Ecolab Executive Death Benefits Plan.

 

 

 

(10.10)

 

Ecolab Executive Long-Term Disability Plan.

 

 

 

(10.11)

 

Ecolab Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan.

 

 

 

(10.12)

 

Ecolab Mirror Savings Plan.

 

 

 

(10.13)

 

Ecolab Mirror Pension Plan.

 

 

 

(10.14)

 

Ecolab Inc. Administrative Document for Non-Qualified Plans.

 

 

 

(10.15)

 

Ecolab Inc. Management Performance Incentive Plan.

 

 

 

(10.16)

 

Ecolab Inc. Change in Control Severance Compensation Policy.

 

 

 

(10.17)

 

Description of Ecolab Inc. Management Incentive Plan.

 

 

 

(10.18)

 

Ecolab Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan.

 

 

 

(10.19)

 

Ecolab Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan.

 

 

 

(10.20)

 

Ecolab Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive Plan.

 

 

 

(10.21)

 

Policy on Reimbursement of Incentive Payments.

 

 

 

(10.22)

 

Second Amended and Restated Nalco Holding Company 2004 Stock Incentive Plan.

 

 

 

(10.23)

 

Nalco Company Death Benefit Agreement and Addendum to Death Benefit Agreement.

 

40



 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Ecolab Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 28 th  day of February, 2014.

 

 

ECOLAB INC.

 

(Registrant)

 

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/Douglas M. Baker, Jr.

 

 

Douglas M. Baker, Jr.

 

 

Chairman of the Board

 

 

and Chief Executive Officer

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of Ecolab Inc. and in the capacities indicated, on the 28 th  day of February 2014.

 

 

/s/Douglas M. Baker, Jr.

 

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

Douglas M. Baker, Jr.

 

(Principal Executive Officer and Director)

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/Daniel J. Schmechel

 

Chief Financial Officer

Daniel J. Schmechel

 

(Principal Financial Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/John J. Corkrean

 

Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller

John J. Corkrean

 

(Principal Accounting Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/James J. Seifert

 

Directors

James J. Seifert

 

 

 

 

 

as attorney-in-fact for:

Barbara J. Beck, Les S. Biller, Carl M. Casale, Stephen I. Chazen, Jerry A. Grundhofer, Arthur J. Higgins, Joel W. Johnson, Michael Larson, Jerry W. Levin, Robert L. Lumpkins, Michael Larson, Victoria J. Reich, Mary M. VanDeWeghe, Suzanne M. Vautrinot and John J. Zillmer

 

 

 

41



 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 2-90702; 33-18202; 33-55986; 33-56101; 333-95043; 333-109890; 33-34000; 33-56151; 333-18627; 333-109891; 33-39228; 33-56125; 333-70835; 33-60266; 333-95041; 333-18617; 333-79449; 333-40239; 333-95037; 333-50969; 333-58360; 333-97927; 333-115567; 333-129427; 333-129428; 333-140988; 333-115568; 333-132139; 333-147148; 333-163837; 333-163838; 333-165130; 333-165132; 333-166646; 333-174028; 333-176601; 333-178300; 333-178302; 333-184650; and 333-190317) and  Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-178273) of Ecolab Inc. of our report dated February 28, 2014 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

Minneapolis, Minnesota

 

February 28, 2014

 

 

42



 

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

The following documents are filed as exhibits to this Report.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exhibit No.

 

Document

 

Method of Filing

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2.1)

 

 

Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of July 19, 2011, among Ecolab Inc., Sustainability Partners Corporation and Nalco Holding Company.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (2.1) of our Form 8-K dated July 19, 2011. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2.2)

 

 

Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 11, 2012, among Ecolab Inc., OFC Technologies Corp. and Permian Mud Service, Inc.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (2.1) of our Form 8-K dated October 12, 2012. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2.3)

 

 

First Amendment dated as of November 28, 2012 to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 11, 2012, among Ecolab Inc., OFC Technologies Corp. and Permian Mud Service, Inc.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (2.3) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2012. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2.4)

 

 

Second Amendment dated as of November 30, 2012 to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as October 11, 2012, among Ecolab Inc., OFC Technologies Corp. and Permian Mud Service, Inc.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (2.1) of our Form 8-K dated November 30, 2012. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2.5)

 

 

Third Amendment dated as of December 28, 2012 to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 11, 2012, among Ecolab Inc., OFC Technologies Corp. and Permian Mud Services, Inc.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (2.4) of our Form 8-K dated April 10, 2013. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2.6)

 

 

Fourth Amendment dated as of April 10, 2013 to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 11, 2012, among Ecolab Inc., OFC Technologies Corp. and Permian Mud Services, Inc.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (2.5) of our Form 8-K dated April 10, 2013. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3.1)

 

 

Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Ecolab Inc., dated as of January 2, 2013.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (3.2) of our Form 8-K dated January 2, 2013. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3.2)

 

 

By-Laws, as amended through February 26, 2010.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (3.2) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2011. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4.1)

 

 

Common Stock.

 

see Exhibits (3.1) and (3.2).

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4.2)

 

 

Form of Common Stock Certificate effective January 2, 2013.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4.2) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2012. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4.3)

 

 

Amended and Restated Indenture, dated as of January 9, 2001, between Ecolab Inc. and The Bank of New York Trust

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4)(A) of our Current

 

43



 

 

 

 

Company, N.A. (as successor in interest to J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association and Bank One, NA) as Trustee.

 

Report on Form 8-K dated January 23, 2001. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4.4)

 

 

Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 8, 2008, between Ecolab Inc. and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of our Form 8-K dated February 8, 2008. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4.5)

 

 

Form of 4.875% Note due February 15, 2015.

 

Included in Exhibit (4.4) above.

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4.6)

 

 

Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 8, 2011, between the Company, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (formerly known as The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as successor in interest to J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association and Bank One, National Association), as original trustee.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4.2) of our Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 5, 2011. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4.7)

 

 

Forms of 2.375% Notes due 2014 Notes, 3.000% Notes due 2016, 4.350% Notes due 2021 and 5.500% Notes due 2041.

 

Included in Exhibit (4.6) above.

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4.8)

 

 

Third Supplement Indenture, dated as of August 9, 2012, between The Company, Wells Fargo Bank National Association, as Trustee and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (formerly known as The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as successor in interest to J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association and Bank One, National Associated as original trustee.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4.1) of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4.9)

 

 

Form of 1.000% Note due August 9, 2015.

 

Included in Exhibit (4.8) above.

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4.10)

 

 

Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 13, 2012, between The Company, Wells Fargo Bank National Association, as Trustee and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (formerly known as The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as successor in interest to J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association and Bank One, National Associated as original trustee.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4.2) of our Form 8-K dated December 13, 2012. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(4.11)

 

 

Form of 1.450% Note due December 8, 2017.

 

Included in Exhibit (4.10) above.

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10.1)

 

 

$1.5 billion 5-Year Revolving Credit Facility, dated as of September 8, 2011, among Ecolab Inc., the lenders party thereto, the issuing banks party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and Swingline Bank, and Citibank, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., as co-syndication agents.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.2) of our Form 8-K dated September 8, 2011. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10.2)

 

 

First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement dated July 26, 2006, dated as of October 27, 2011, by and among Ecolab Inc. and the Noteholders party thereto.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.2) of our Form 8-K dated October 27, 2011. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10.3)

 

 

Note Purchase Agreement dated October 27, 2011, by and among Ecolab Inc. and the Purchasers party thereto.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.1) of our Form 8-K dated October 27, 2011. (File No. 001-9328)

 

44



 

(10.4)

 

 

Documents comprising global Commercial Paper Programs.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(i)

 

 

U.S. $200,000,000 Euro-Commercial Paper Programme.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(a)

 

Amended and Restated Dealer Agreement dated 2 December 2005 between Ecolab Inc. (as Guarantor), Ecolab B.V. and Ecolab Holding GmbH (as Issuers), Ecolab Inc., Credit Suisse First Boston (Europe) Limited (as Arranger), and Citibank International plc and Credit Suisse First Boston (Europe) Limited (as Dealers).

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)B(i)(a) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2005. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(b)

 

Amended and Restated Note Agency Agreement dated as of 2 December 2005 between Ecolab Inc., Ecolab B.V. and Ecolab Holding GmbH (as Issuers) and Citibank, N.A. as Issue and Paying Agent.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)B(i)(b) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2005. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(c)

 

Deed of Covenant made on 2 December 2005 by Ecolab Inc., Ecolab B.V. and Ecolab Holding GmbH.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)B(i)(c) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2005. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(d)

 

Deed of Guarantee made on 2 December 2005.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)B(i)(d) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2005. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(ii)

 

 

U.S. $1,500,000,000 U.S. Commercial Paper Program.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(a)

 

Form of Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement for 4 (2) Program.  The dealers for the program are Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and RBS Securities Inc.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)A(ii)(a) of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(b)

 

Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement dated as of July 10, 2000 between Ecolab Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (as successor to Bank One, National Association) as Issuing and Paying Agent.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)A(ii)(b) of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(c)

 

Corporate Commercial Paper — Master Note dated July 10, 2000.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.5)(ii)(c) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2011. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(d)

 

Annex to Corporate Commercial Paper — Master Note dated July 10, 2000 effective January 9, 2012.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.5)(ii)(d) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2011. (File No. 001-9328)

 

45



 

(10.5)

 

 

$900 million Term Loan Agreement, dated as of November 15, 2012, among Ecolab Inc., the lenders party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as sole lead arranger.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.1) of our Form 8-K dated November 15, 2012. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10.6)

(i)

 

Ecolab Inc. 2001 Non-Employee Director Stock Option and Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective August 1, 2013.

 

Filed herewith electronically.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(ii)

 

Master Agreement Relating to Options (as in effect through May 7, 2004).

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)D(i) of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(iii)

 

Master Agreement Relating to Periodic Options, as amended effective as of May 1, 2004.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)D(ii) of our Form  10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(iv)

 

Amendment No. 1 to Master Agreement Relating to Periodic Options, as amended effective May 2, 2008.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)B of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10.7)

(i)

 

Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 26, 2006 by and among Ecolab Inc. and the Purchasers party thereto.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10) of our Form 8-K dated July 26, 2006. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(ii)

 

First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement dated July 26, 2006, dated as of October 27, 2011, by and among Ecolab Inc. and the Noteholders party thereto.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.2) of our Form 8-K dated October 27, 2011. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10.8)

 

 

Form of Director Indemnification Agreement.  Substantially identical agreements are in effect as to each of our directors.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)I of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2003. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10.9)

(i)

 

Ecolab Executive Death Benefits Plan, as amended and restated effective March 1, 1994.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)H(i) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2006. (File No. 001-9328) See also Exhibit (10.14) hereof.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(ii)

 

Amendment No. 1 to Ecolab Executive Death Benefits Plan, effective July 1, 1997.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)H(ii) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 1998. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(iii)

 

Second Declaration of Amendment to Ecolab Executive Death Benefits Plan, effective March 1, 1998.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)H(iii) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 1998. (File No. 001-9328)

 

46



 

 

(iv)

 

Amendment No. 3 to the Ecolab Executive Death Benefits Plan, effective August 12, 2005.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)B of our Form 8-K dated December 13, 2005. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(v)

 

Amendment No. 4 to the Ecolab Executive Death Benefits Plan, effective January 1, 2005.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)H(v) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2009. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10.10)

 

 

Ecolab Executive Long-Term Disability Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 1994.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)I of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2004. (File No. 001-9328) See also Exhibit (10.14) hereof.

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10.11)

 

 

Ecolab Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (As Amended and Restated effective as of January 1, 2014).

 

Filed herewith electronically. See also Exhibit (10.14) hereof.

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10.12)

 

 

Ecolab Mirror Savings Plan (As Amended and Restated effective as of January 1, 2014).

 

Filed herewith electronically. See also Exhibit (10.14) hereof.

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10.13)

 

 

Ecolab Mirror Pension Plan (As Amended and Restated effective as of January 1, 2014).

 

Filed herewith electronically. See also Exhibit (10.14) hereof.

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10.14)

(i)

 

Ecolab Inc. Administrative Document for Non-Qualified Plans (Amended and Restated effective as of January 1, 2011).

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.16) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2011. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(ii)

 

Amendment No. 1 to the Ecolab Inc. Administrative Document for Non-Qualified Plans effective as of January 1, 2013.

 

Filed herewith electronically.

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10.15)

 

 

Ecolab Inc. Management Performance Incentive Plan, as amended and restated on February 27, 2009.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10) of our Form 8-K dated May 8, 2009. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10.16)

(i)

 

Ecolab Inc. Change in Control Severance Compensation Policy, as amended and restated effective February 26, 2010.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10) of our Form 8-K dated February 26, 2010. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(ii)

 

Amendment No. 1 to Ecolab Inc. Change-in-Control Severance Policy (as Amended and Restated effective as of February 26, 2010).

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10-18)(ii) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2011. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10.17)

 

 

Description of Ecolab Management Incentive Plan.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)Q of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2008. (File No. 001-9328)

 

47



 

(10.18)

(i)

 

Ecolab Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10) of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 (File No. 001-9328).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(ii)

 

Non-Statutory Stock Option Agreement as in effect for grants beginning May 11, 2002 through August 12, 2003.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)A(i) of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(iii)

 

Non-statutory Stock Option Agreement as in effect for grants beginning August 13, 2003.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)A(ii) of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10.19)

(i)

 

Ecolab Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)A of our Form 8-K dated May 6, 2005. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(ii)

 

Amendment No. 1 to Ecolab Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, adopted October 31, 2008.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)V(ii) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2008. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(iii)

 

Sample form of Non-Statutory Stock Option Agreement under the Ecolab Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan in effect for grants prior to October 31, 2008.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)B of our Form 8-K dated May 6, 2005. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(iv)

 

Sample form of Non-Statutory Stock Option Agreement under the Ecolab Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan in effect for grants after October 31, 2008.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)V(iv) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2008. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(v)

 

Sample form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Ecolab Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)W(iii) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2006. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(vi)

 

Sample form of Performance Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under the Ecolab Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10) of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10.20)

(i)

 

Ecolab Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective May 2, 2013.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10.1) of our Form 8-K dated May 2, 2013. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(ii)

 

Sample form of Non-Statutory Stock Option Agreement under the Ecolab Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive Plan.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)B of our Form 8-K dated May 6, 2010. (File No. 001-9328)

 

48



 

 

(iii)

 

Sample form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)C of our Form 8-K dated May 6, 2010. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(iv)

 

Sample form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Ecolab Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive Plan.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)D of our Form 8-K dated May 6, 2010. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(v)

 

Sample form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the Ecolab Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive Plan.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)A of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10.21)

 

 

Policy on Reimbursement of Incentive Payments adopted December 4, 2008.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)W of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2008. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10.22)

 

 

Second Amended and Restated Nalco Holding Company 2004 Stock Incentive Plan.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4.3) of our Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form S-8 to Form S-4 Registration Statement dated December 2, 2011. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10.23)

 

 

Form of Nalco Company Death Benefit Agreement and Addendum to Death Benefit Agreement.

 

Incorporated by reference from Exhibit (99.2) on Form 8-K of Nalco Holding Company filed on May 11, 2005 (File No. 001-32342).

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10.24)

 

 

Sublease Agreement, dated as of November 4, 2003 between Leo Holding Company, as sub-landlord and Ondeo Nalco Company, as subtenant.

 

Incorporated by reference from Exhibit (10.6) of the Registration Statement on Form S-4 of Nalco Company filed on May 17, 2004 (File No. 333-115560).

 

 

 

 

 

 

(13.1)

 

 

Those portions of our Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2012 which are incorporated by reference into Parts I and II hereof.

 

Filed herewith electronically.

 

 

 

 

 

 

(14.1)

 

 

Ecolab Code of Conduct, as amended November 29, 2012.

 

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (14.1) of our Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2012. (File No. 001-9328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(21.1)

 

 

List of Subsidiaries.

 

Filed herewith electronically.

 

 

 

 

 

 

(23.1)

 

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm at page 42 hereof is filed as a part hereof.

 

See page 42 hereof.

 

 

 

 

 

 

(24.1)

 

 

Powers of Attorney.

 

Filed herewith electronically.

 

 

 

 

 

 

(31.1)

 

 

Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications.

 

Filed herewith electronically.

 

49



 

(32.1)

 

 

Section 1350 Certifications.

 

Filed herewith electronically.

 

 

 

 

 

 

(99.1)

 

 

Exhibit (99.1) of our Form 8-K filed on April 27, 2012.

 

Incorporated by reference to unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of income for the twelve-months ended December 31, 2011 and corresponding footnotes included as part of Exhibit (99.1) of our Form 8-K filed on April 27, 2012.

 

 

 

 

 

 

(101.1)

 

 

Interactive Data File.

 

Filed herewith electronically.

 

50


Exhibit (10.6)

 

ECOLAB INC.

 

2001 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR STOCK OPTION AND

 

DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

 

(As Amended and Restated Effective as of August 1, 2013)

 

Pursuant to the amending power reserved to the Company’s Board of Directors by section 14.1 of the Ecolab Inc. 2001 Non-Employee Director Stock Option and Deferred Compensation Plan, Ecolab Inc. (the “Company”) amended and restated its “Ecolab Inc. 2001 Non-Employee Director Stock Option and Deferred Compensation Plan” in its entirety to read as set forth in the attached instrument, entitled “Ecolab Inc. 2001 Non-Employee Director Stock Option and Deferred Compensation Plan,” effective as of August 1, 2013.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF , Ecolab Inc. has caused this instrument to be executed by its duly authorized officers and its corporate seal to be affixed.

 

 

Dated:  25 November 2013

ECOLAB INC.

 

 

 

 

(Seal)

 

 

 

 

/s/Douglas M. Baker, Jr.

 

Douglas M. Baker, Jr.

Chairman of the Board and

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

Attest:

 

 

 

 

 

/s/Michael C. McCormick

 

Michael C. McCormick

Corporate Compliance Officer, Associate General Counsel And Assistant Secretary

 

 



 

ECOLAB INC.

 

2001 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR STOCK OPTION AND

 

DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

 

(As Amended and Restated Effective as of August 1, 2013)

 

1.              Description .

 

1.1           Name .  The name of the Plan is the “Ecolab Inc. 2001 Non-Employee Director Stock Option and Deferred Compensation Plan.”

 

1.2           Purposes .  The purpose of the Plan is to attract and retain the services of experienced and knowledgeable non-employee directors by providing such directors with greater flexibility in the form and timing of receipt of compensation for their service on the Board of Directors and an opportunity to obtain a greater proprietary interest in the Company’s long-term success and progress through the receipt of Periodic Options and Annual Share Units and the deferral of cash compensation in the form of credits to their Share Accounts or Cash Accounts, thereby aligning such directors’ interests more closely with the interests of the Company’s stockholders.

 

1.3           Type .  The Plan is maintained primarily for the purpose of compensating Qualified Directors and providing them with the opportunity to obtain equity-based compensation and to defer cash compensation.  The Plan is intended to be unfunded for tax purposes.  It will be construed and administered in a manner that is consistent with and gives effect to the foregoing.

 

1.4           Components of Director Compensation .  Qualified Directors who are eligible pursuant to Section 2.1 will receive Periodic Options, Share Unit Compensation and Other Director Compensation as part of their annual compensation for services rendered as directors of the Company, as determined by the Board from time to time.  Qualified Directors who are eligible pursuant to Section 2.1 may defer the receipt of some or all of their Other Director Compensation in the form of credits to their Cash Accounts and Share Accounts.

 

1.5           American Jobs Creation Act (AJCA) .

 

(a)            It is intended that with respect to amounts deferred after December 31, 2004, the Plan, as amended, comply with the provisions of Section 409A of the Code, as enacted by the AJCA, so as to prevent the inclusion in gross income of any amount credited to a Participant’s Account hereunder in a taxable year that is prior to the taxable year or years in which such amounts would otherwise be actually distributed or made available to the Participant and the Plan shall be construed to give effect to such intention.  It is intended that the Plan be administered in a manner that will comply with

 

1



 

Section 409A of the Code, including proposed, temporary or final regulations or any other guidance issued by the Secretary of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service with respect thereto (collectively with the AJCA, the “409A Guidance”).

 

(b)            The Administrator shall not take any action hereunder that would violate any provision of Section 409A of the Code.  It is intended that all Participant elections hereunder will comply with Code Section 409A and the 409A Guidance, to the extent it applies.  The Administrator is authorized to adopt rules or regulations deemed necessary or appropriate in connection therewith to anticipate and/or comply with the requirements thereof (including any transition or grandfather rules thereunder).  In this regard, the Administrator is authorized to permit Participant elections with respect to amounts deferred after December 31, 2004 and is also permitted to give the Participants the right to amend or revoke such elections in accordance with the 409A Guidance.

 

(c)            The Plan was amended effective as of January 1, 2005 to create two separate Sub-Accounts for each Participant’s Account hereunder — (i) the “Pre-2005 Sub-Account” for amounts that are “deferred” (as such terms is defined in the 409A Guidance) as of December 31, 2004 (and earnings thereon) and (ii) the “Post-2004 Sub-Account” for amounts that are deferred after December 31, 2004 (and earnings thereon).

 

(d)            In furtherance of, but without limiting the foregoing, any deferrals (and the earnings thereon) that were deferred prior to January 1, 2005 and that qualify for “grandfathered status” under Section 409A Guidance shall continue to be governed by the law applicable to nonqualified deferred compensation prior to the addition of Section 409A to the Code and shall be subject to the terms and conditions specified in the Plan as in effect prior to January 1, 2005.

 

(e)            It is intended that any Periodic Options issued under the Plan after December 31, 2004 be exempt from the requirements of Section 409A of the Code and the Plan shall be construed and administered in a manner consistent with such intent.

 

2.              Participation .

 

2.1           Eligibility .

 

(a)            Each individual who is a Participant under any of the Prior Deferred Compensation Plans will be eligible to have credits made to his or her Cash Account and Share Account pursuant to Section 4.

 

(b)            Each individual who is a Qualified Director at any point during a Credit Period with respect to which a credit is made pursuant to Section 5.1 is eligible to have such credit made to his or her Share Account pursuant to Section 5.1.

 

(c)            Each individual who is a Qualified Director on the first day of an Election Period is eligible to make a deferral election pursuant to Section 5.2 with respect to such Election Period.  An individual who first becomes a Qualified Director after the first day of the Election Period is eligible to make a deferral election pursuant to Section 5.2 with respect to compensation for services rendered after the effective date of the election and

 

2



 

for the remainder of such Election Period.  Any deferral election under Section 5.2 by a Participant who receives a distribution (i) from his or her Post-2004 Sub-Account pursuant to Section 8.2(a) will be suspended, and no further amounts will be deferred under Section 5.2, until the Election Period that begins after the first anniversary of such distribution, or (ii) from his or her Pre-2005 Sub-Account pursuant to Section 8.2(a) or 8.2(c) will be suspended effective for the next Election Period, and no further amounts will be deferred under Section 5.2 for such Election Period.  Each individual who has made a valid election pursuant to Section 5.2 and is a Qualified Director at any point during a Credit Period with respect to which a credit is made pursuant to Section 5.2 is eligible to have such credit made to his or her Account pursuant to Section 5.2.

 

(d)            Each Qualified Director is eligible to receive Periodic Options pursuant to Section 7.

 

2.2           Ceasing to be Eligible .  An individual who ceases to be a Qualified Director is not eligible to receive Periodic Options pursuant to Section 7, or Share Unit Compensation pursuant to Section 5.1, or to make any elections under Section 5.2, or receive Other Director Compensation (and related deferral credits pursuant to Section 5.2, except to the extent required under Code section 409A), other than such credits relating to the period prior to such cessation.

 

2.3           Condition of Participation .  Each Participant, as a condition of participation in the Plan, is bound by all the terms and conditions of the Plan and the Plan Rules, including but not limited to the reserved right of the Company to amend or terminate the Plan, and must furnish to the Administrator such pertinent information, and execute such election forms and other instruments, as the Administrator or Plan Rules may require by such dates as the Administrator or Plan Rules may establish.

 

2.4           Termination of Participation .  An individual will cease to be a Participant as of the date on which he or she is neither eligible to receive Periodic Options pursuant to Sections 2.2 and 7, nor to make any elections or receive further credits pursuant to Sections 2.2, 5 and 6 and his or her outstanding Periodic Options have been exercised, cancelled or expired and his or her entire Account balances have been distributed.

 

3.              Participant Cash and Share Accounts .  For each Participant, the Administrator will establish and maintain a Cash Account and a Share Account to evidence amounts credited with respect to the Participant pursuant to Sections 4, 5 and 6.  Subject to Section 8.2(c), each Participant will always have a fully vested nonforfeitable interest in his or her Account. For each Participant, each of the Cash Account and Share Account shall be further divided into the following two Sub-Accounts:  (a) the “Pre-2005 Sub-Account” for amounts that are “deferred” (as such term is defined in the 409A Guidance) as of December 31, 2004 (and earnings thereon), including carryover credits described in Article 4, and (b) the “Post-2004 Sub-Account” for amounts that are deferred after December 31, 2004 (and earnings thereon).

 

4.              Carryover Credits from Prior Deferred Compensation Plans .  As of the 2001 Annual Meeting Date, the Cash Account and Share Account of each then-current Participant were credited with the amount of cash or Share Units, if any, in such Participant’s corresponding cash

 

3



 

account and share account under the Prior Deferred Compensation Plans, and such accounts were reduced to zero.

 

5.              Compensation and Deferral Credits .

 

5.1           Share Unit Compensation:  Credits to Share Account .  Each Qualified Director will receive additional annual compensation (the “Share Unit Compensation”) in the form of credits to the Qualified Director’s Share Account.  The amount of the Share Unit Compensation will be expressed in U.S. dollars and determined from time to time by the Board.  A Qualified Director’s Share Account will be credited pursuant to this section as of the last day of each Credit Period (a “Credit Date”) with the number of whole and fractional Share Units equal to the quotient of:  (a) the dollar amount of the Share Unit Compensation allocated to such full Credit Period, divided by (b) the Market Price on the Credit Date.  If a Qualified Director has not served for the entire Credit Period for which the Share Unit Compensation relates, the amount credited to the Qualified Director’s Share Account will be based on the dollar amount of the Share Unit Compensation earned by the Qualified Director during the portion of the Credit Period for which he or she served.  All credits made to the Qualified Director’s Share Account after December 31, 2004 will be made to the Post-2004 Sub-Account.

 

5.2           Other Director Compensation:  Credits to Cash and Share Accounts .  Elective deferrals of Other Director Compensation will be made in accordance with the following rules:

 

(a)            Election to Defer Other Director Compensation .  Each Qualified Director may elect, in accordance with this section, to defer the receipt of all or a portion (in increments of ten percent) of his or her Other Director Compensation relating to services performed during an Election Period (or for a newly eligible Qualified Director such shorter period as provided in Section 5.2(b)) in the form of credits to his or her Cash Account and/or Share Account.  Any such deferral election will automatically apply to the Participant’s Other Director Compensation, as the amount of such Other Director Compensation is adjusted from time to time. Notwithstanding the foregoing, all Qualified Directors shall be required to make a deferral election for the 2005 Plan Year and prior elections shall not be given any further force or effect.

 

(b)            Time of Filing Election .  A deferral election pursuant to this section will not be effective unless it is made on a properly completed election form received by the Administrator before the first day of the Election Period to which the deferral election relates or, in the case of an individual who first becomes a Qualified Director on or after the first day of the Election Period, within 30 days after the date such individual becomes a Qualified Director.  Any election delivered or deemed to be delivered under this Section 5.2(b) applies only to Other Director Compensation relating to services performed after the effective date of the election.

 

(c)            Allocation of Deferral .  In conjunction with each deferral election made pursuant to this section, a Qualified Director must elect, in accordance with and subject to the Plan Rules, how the deferral is to be allocated (in increments of ten percent only) among his or her Cash Account and Share Account.  The sum of such percentages must

 

4



 

not exceed 100 percent.  Any portion of the deferral for which no election is made will be allocated to the Qualified Director’s Cash Account.

 

(d)            Credits .  Other Director Compensation deferred pursuant to this section will be credited to a Qualified Director’s Cash Account and/or Share Account, as elected, as of the last day of each Credit Period.  Such credits to the Qualified Director’s Cash Account will be in United States dollars equal to the amount of the deferral allocated to each such Account.  Such credits to a Qualified Director’s Share Account will be the number of whole and fractional Share Units determined by dividing the United States dollar amount of the deferral allocated to the Share Account by the Market Price of a Share on the Credit Date.   If a Qualified Director has not served or will not serve for the entire Credit Period for which the Other Director Compensation relates, the amounts credited to the Qualified Director’s Cash Account and/or Share Account, as elected, on the last day of the Credit Period will be based on the amount of the Other Director Compensation that the Qualified Director has earned during the portion of the Credit Period for which he or she served. All credits made to the Qualified Director’s Cash Account and/or Share Account after December 31, 2004 will be made to the respective Post-2004 Sub-Account.

 

(e)            Succeeding Election Periods .  A deferral election pursuant to this section will remain in effect until revoked or modified for future Election Periods by the Qualified Director by delivering a new deferral election not later than the day before the first Election Period to which the new deferral election relates.

 

(f)             Irrevocability .  A deferral election for a given Election Period is effective and becomes irrevocable after the latest date by which the deferral election is required to be given to the Administrator for such Election Period.

 

6.              Earnings Credits .

 

6.1           Earnings Credits to Cash Accounts .  As of the last day of each Credit Period, and before any credits have been made pursuant to Section 5 on such date, a Participant’s Cash Account will be credited with interest, calculated monthly on the balance in the Cash Account as of the last day of the immediately preceding calendar month at the Prime Rate in effect on that day. Interest will be credited separately for the Pre-2005 Sub-Account and Post-2004 Sub-Account of the Participant’s Cash Account.

 

6.2           Earnings Credits to Share Accounts .  A Participant’s Share Account will be credited as of the date on which dividends are paid on Shares with that number of whole and fractional Share Units determined by dividing the dollar amount of the dividends that would have been payable to the Participant if the number of Share Units credited to the Participant’s Share Account on the record date for such dividend payment had then been Shares registered in the name of such Participant by the Market Price of a Share on the date as of which the credit is made. Dividends will be credited separately for the Pre-2005 Sub-Account and Post-2004 Sub-Account of the Participant’s Share Account.

 

5



 

7.              Periodic Options .  A Qualified Director may be granted from time to time one or more options to purchase that number of whole Shares as determined by the Board in its sole discretion (“Periodic Options”).  Periodic Options will be granted as of the date specified in the grant resolution of the Board.   The terms of the Periodic Options are set forth in Section 9.

 

8.              Distributions .

 

8.1           Distribution of Cash and Share Accounts to a Participant Upon Termination of Service .

 

(a)            Form of Distribution:  Pre-2005 Sub-Account .  A Participant’s Pre-2005 Sub-Account of his or her Cash Account and Share Account will be distributed as provided in this section in a lump sum payment unless:

 

(i)             the Participant elects, on a properly completed election form, to receive his or her distribution in the form of annual installment payments for a period of not more than 10 years, and

 

(ii)            except when cessation results from Disability, the date on which he or she ceases to be a member of the Board follows by more than one year the date on which a properly completed election form is received by the Administrator.

 

Any election made pursuant to this section may be changed from time to time upon the Administrator’s receipt of a properly completed election form, provided that, unless cessation results from Disability, such change will not be valid and will not have any effect unless it is made more than one year prior to a Participant’s cessation of service as member of the Board.  A new election to change has no effect on any previous election until the new election becomes effective, at which time any previous election will automatically be void.  (For example, if the Administrator receives an election to change on July 1 of year 1 and another election on September 1 of year 1, the July 1 election will become effective on July 1 of year 2 and will remain in effect through August 30 of year 2.  On September 1 of year 2, the September 1 election will become effective.)  Any election made pursuant to this section will apply to the entire balance of the Participant’s Pre-2005 Sub-Accounts of his or her Cash and Share Accounts attributable to credits with respect to the period through the date on which he or she ceases to be a member of the Board.  If a Participant has a valid election in effect under any Prior Deferred Compensation Plan, such Participant’s prior election will automatically be deemed to be the Participant’s election under this section unless and until a new election is made and has become effective.  Any distribution from a Participant’s Pre-2005 Sub-Account of his or her Cash Account will be made in cash only.  Subject to Section 13, any distribution from a Participant’s Pre-2005 Sub-Account of his or her Share Account will be made in whole Shares only, rounded up to the next whole Share.

 

(b)            Form of Distribution:  Post-2004 Sub-Account .  A Participant’s Post-2004 Sub-Account of his or her Cash Account and Share Account will be distributed as follows:

 

6



 

(i)             for deferrals (and earnings thereon) credited for periods prior to January 1, 2014, as a lump sum payment.

 

(ii)            for deferrals (and earnings thereon) credited for periods after December 31, 2013, as a lump sum payment unless the Participant elects, on a properly completed election form filed with the Administrator

 

(A)           on or before December 31, 2013, with respect to his or her deferral credits (and earnings thereon) relating to compensation earned for services after December 31, 2013, or

 

(B)           at the time the Qualified Director first becomes eligible to participate in the Plan and makes his or her initial deferral election pursuant to Section 5.2,

 

to receive his or her distribution in the form of annual payments for a period of ten (10) years.

 

(iii)           A Participant may elect to change the form of benefit under Clause (i) or (ii).  Any such change will be considered made only when it becomes irrevocable under the terms of the Plan.  Any subsequent election will be considered irrevocable on the date it is received and accepted by the Administrator (but not later than fifteen (15) days following receipt) subject to the following:

 

(A)           the subsequent election may not take effect until at least twelve (12) months after the date on which the election is made;

 

(B)           the election must be made not less than twelve (12) months before the date the payment is otherwise scheduled to be paid; and

 

(C)           the payment (except in the case of death, Disability or Unforeseeable Emergency) of the Participant’s Post-2004 Sub-Account (or, if applicable, the portion of such account) pursuant to such subsequent election shall be made or commence to be made on the date that is five (5) years after the date the payment would otherwise be paid (or for installment payments treated as a single payment, the date the first amount was otherwise scheduled to be paid).

 

Any distribution from a Participant’s Post-2004 Sub-Account of his or her Cash Account will be made in cash only.  Subject to Section 13, any distribution from a

 

7



 

Participant’s Post-2004 Sub-Account of his or her Share Account will be made in whole Shares only, rounded up to the next whole Share.

 

(c)            Time of Distribution:  Pre-2005 Sub-Account .  Distribution of a Participant’s Pre-2005 Sub-Account to a Participant will be made (to the extent a distribution is in the form of a lump sum) or commence (to the extent a distribution is in the form of installments) as soon as administratively practicable after the next Credit Date after the Participant ceases to be a member of the Board; provided that if a lump sum distribution from a Participant’s Share Account would otherwise be made after the record date for a dividend but before the payment date for such dividend, the distribution will be delayed and made as soon as administratively practicable after the earnings credits have been made to the Share Account pursuant to Section 6.2 on the payment date of the dividend.

 

(d)            Time of Distribution:  Post-2004 Sub-Account .  Distribution of a Participant’s Post-2004 Sub-Account will be made (to the extent a distribution is in the form of a lump sum) or commence (to the extent a distribution is in the form of installments) on the next Credit Date after the Participant’s Termination of Service or as soon as administratively practicable (but not more than 90 days) after such Credit Date and, for subsequent installment distributions, on the annual anniversary of such Credit Date, provided if a distribution from a Participant’s Share Account would otherwise be made after the record date for a dividend but before the payment date for such dividend, the distribution may be delayed and made as soon as administratively practicable after the earnings credit has been made to the Share Account pursuant to Section 6.2 on the payment date of the dividend, provided the distribution is made within 90 days after such Credit Date.

 

If, at his or her Termination of Service, a Participant is considered to be a “specified employee,” as defined under Code Section 409A and the Ecolab Inc. Administrative Document for Non-Qualified Benefit Plans, as amended, distribution of amounts that would otherwise be payable will be suspended until the date that is six months after the Participant’s Termination of Service, or if earlier, upon the Participant’s death.

 

8.2           Other Distributions from Cash and Share Accounts to a Participant .  The provisions of this section will apply notwithstanding Section 8.1 or any election by a Participant to the contrary.

 

(a)            Withdrawals Due to Unforeseeable Emergency .  A distribution will be made to a Participant from his or her Account if the Participant submits a written distribution request to the Administrator and the Administrator determines that the Participant has experienced an Unforeseeable Emergency.  The amount of the distribution may not exceed the lesser of:

 

(i)             the amount necessary to satisfy the emergency, as determined by the Administrator, or

 

8



 

(ii)            the sum of the balances of the Participant’s Accounts as of the date of the distribution, as the case may be.

 

Payments made on account of an Unforeseeable Emergency will not be made to the extent that such Unforeseeable Emergency is or may be relieved through reimbursement or compensation by insurance or otherwise, by liquidation of the Participant’s assets (to the extent that such liquidation would not itself cause severe financial hardship) or, to the extent permitted by Code Section 409A, by cessation of deferrals under Section 5.2.  Any distribution pursuant to this section will be made as soon as administratively practicable after the Administrator’s determination that the Participant has experienced an Unforeseeable Emergency and in the form of a lump sum payment that is in cash from the Cash Account and in Shares from the Share Account (rounded up to the next whole Share).  Any distribution pursuant to this section will be made first from the Participant’s Cash Account, then from the Participant’s Share Account.

 

(b)            Small Benefits .

 

(i)             Cash Account .  Each installment distribution to a Participant who has ceased to be a member of the Board will be at least $2,500 or such smaller amount that equals the balance of the Participant’s Cash Account.

 

(ii)            Share Account .  If the balance of the Share Account of a Participant who has ceased to be a member of the Board is fewer than 100 Share Units as of the day of any installment distribution, such remaining balance will be distributed to the Participant in the form of a lump sum distribution, that will consist of the number of Shares equal to the number of Share Units credited to the Share Account as of that date, rounded up to the next whole Share, as soon as administratively practicable.  Each installment distribution to a Participant who has ceased to be a member of the Board must be at least 100 Share Units or such smaller number of Share Units that remains in the Participant’s Share Account.

 

(c)            Accelerated Distribution .  A Participant may, at any time, elect an immediate distribution of his or her Pre-2005 Sub-Accounts of his or her Cash and Share Accounts in an amount equal to 90 percent of the sum of the balances of the Pre-2005 Sub-Accounts of his or her Cash and Share Accounts as of the date of the distribution, in which case the remaining balances of such Pre-2005 Sub-Accounts of his or her Cash and Share Accounts will be forfeited.  The distribution will be made in the form of a lump sum payment as soon as administratively practicable after the Administrator’s receipt of a written application in the form prescribed by the Administrator.  Any distribution pursuant to this section from a Participant’s Pre-2005 Sub-Accounts of his or her Cash Account will be made in cash.  Any distribution pursuant to this section from a Participant’s Pre-2005 Sub-Accounts of his or her Share Account will be made in whole Shares (rounded up to the next whole Share).  The balance of the Pre-2005 Sub-Accounts of his or her Cash or Share Accounts from which a distribution is made will be reduced to zero as of the date of the distribution.

 

9



 

No distribution of a Participant’s Post-2004 Sub-Accounts of his or her Cash or Share Accounts will be allowed under this Section 8.2(c).

 

(d)            Payment in Event of Incapacity .  If any individual entitled to receive any payment under the Plan is, in the judgment of the Administrator, physically, mentally or legally incapable of receiving or acknowledging receipt of the payment, and no legal representative has been appointed for the individual, the Administrator may (but is not required to) cause the payment to be made to any one or more of the following as may be chosen by the Administrator: the Beneficiary (in the case of the incapacity of a Participant); the institution maintaining the individual; a custodian for the individual under the Uniform Transfers to Minors Act of any state; or the individual’s spouse, child, parent, or other relative by blood or marriage.  The Administrator is not required to see to the proper application of any such payment, and the payment completely discharges all claims under the Plan against the Company, the Plan and the Trust to the extent of the payment.

 

(e)            Reduction of Account Balance .  Except as specified in the case of accelerated distributions pursuant to Section 8.2(c), the balance of the Sub-Account of the Cash or Share Account from which a distribution is made will be reduced, as of the date of the distribution, by the cash amount or number of Shares distributed, as the case may be.

 

8.3           Distribution of Cash and Share Accounts to a Beneficiary Upon Death of a Participant .

 

(a)            Form .  Following a Participant’s death, the balances of the Participant’s Cash and Share Accounts will be distributed to the Participant’s Beneficiary in a lump sum payment whether or not payments had commenced to the Participant in the form of installments prior to his or her death, to the extent permitted by Code Section 409A, unless, with respect to the Participant’s Post-2004 Sub-Account, the Participant had elected, on a properly completed election form at the time the installment distribution form was elected, to have the installment distribution to his or her Beneficiary commence or continue following his or her death.  Any distribution from a Participant’s Cash Account will be made in cash and any distribution from a Participant’s Share Account will be made in whole Shares, rounded up to the next whole Share.

 

(b)            Time .  Distribution to a Beneficiary will be made as soon as administratively practicable after the next Credit Date after the date on which the Administrator receives notice of the Participant’s death; provided that if a distribution from the Participant’s Share Account would otherwise be made after the record date for a dividend but before the payment date for such dividend, the distribution will be delayed and made as soon as administratively practicable after the earnings credits have been made to the Share Account pursuant to Section 6.2 on the payment date of the dividend. Distribution of a Participant’s Post-2004 Sub-Account to a Beneficiary will be made as soon as administratively practicable but not later than 90 days after the next Credit Date after the date of the Participant’s death; provided that if a distribution from the Participant’s Share Account would otherwise be made after the record date for a dividend

 

10



 

but before the payment date for such dividend, the distribution may be delayed and made as soon as administratively practicable after the earnings credit has been made to the Share Account pursuant to Section 6.2 on the payment date of the dividend, but in no event later than 90 days after the next Credit Date after the Participant’s death.  Notwithstanding the preceding, if distribution to the Participant in the form of installment payments had commenced prior to the Participant’s death and the Participant had elected, in accordance with Section 8.3(a), to have such installment payments continue to the Beneficiary, such payments will be made at the same time installment payments were scheduled to be made to the Participant.

 

(c)            Beneficiary Designation .

 

(i)             Each Participant may designate, in a form prescribed by the Administrator, one or more primary Beneficiaries or alternative Beneficiaries to receive all or a specified part of the balance of his or her Cash or Share Accounts after his or her death, and the Participant may change or revoke any such designation from time to time.  No such designation, change or revocation is effective unless signed by the Participant and received by the Administrator during the Participant’s lifetime.  If a Participant has a valid designation in effect under any Prior Deferred Compensation Plan, such Participant’s prior designation will automatically be deemed to be the Participant’s designation under this section unless and until a new designation is made and has become effective.

 

(ii)            Any portion of a Participant’s Cash and Share Accounts for which the Participant fails to designate a Beneficiary, revokes a Beneficiary designation without naming another Beneficiary or designates one or more Beneficiaries, none of whom survives the Participant or exists at the time in question, will be paid to the Participant’s surviving spouse or, if the Participant is not survived by a spouse, to the representative of the Participant’s estate.

 

(iii)           The automatic Beneficiaries specified above and, unless the designation otherwise specifies, the Beneficiaries designated by the Participant, become fixed as of the Participant’s death so that, if a Beneficiary survives the Participant but dies before the receipt of the payment due such Beneficiary, the payment will be made to the representative of such Beneficiary’s estate.  Any designation of a Beneficiary by name that is accompanied by a description of the legal relationship or only by a statement of legal relationship to the Participant is effective only to designate the person or persons standing in such legal relationship to the Participant at the Participant’s death.

 

8.4           Distribution of Post-2004 Sub-Accounts of Cash and Share Accounts Upon Disability of a Participant .

 

(a)            Form .  Following a Participant’s Disability, the balances of the Participant’s Post-2004 Sub-Accounts of his or her Cash and Share Accounts will be distributed to the Participant in a lump sum payment whether or not payments had commenced to the Participant in the form of installments prior to his or her Disability,

 

11



 

unless, with respect to the Participant’s Post-2004 Sub-Account, the Participant had elected, on a properly completed election form at the time the installment distribution form was elected, to have the installment distribution to his or her Beneficiary commence or continue following his or her death.    Any distribution from a Participant’s Cash Account will be made in cash and any distribution from a Participant’s Share Account will be made in whole Shares, rounded up to the next whole Share.

 

(b)            Time .  Distribution of a Participant’s Post-2004 Sub-Account will be made on the next Credit Date following the Participant’s Disability or as soon as administratively practicable (but not later than 90 days) after such Credit Date; provided that if a distribution from the Participant’s Share Account would otherwise be made after the record date for a dividend but before the payment date for such dividend, the distribution may be delayed and made as soon as administratively practicable after the earnings credit has been made to the Share Account pursuant to Section 6.2 on the payment date of the dividend, provided distribution is made not later than 90 days after the next Credit Date after the Participant’s Disability.  Notwithstanding the preceding, if distribution to the Participant in the form of installment payments had commenced prior to the Participant’s death and the Participant had elected, in accordance with Section 8.4(a), to have such installment payments continue to the Beneficiary, such payments will be made at the same time installment payments were scheduled to be made to the Participant.

 

(c)            Effective Date .  This Section 8.4 is effective for any Disability arising after October 1, 2013.

 

8.5           Amount of Distribution .

 

(a)            Amount of Distribution for Cash Account .

 

(i)             Lump Sum .  The amount of a lump sum payment from a Participant’s applicable Sub-Account of his or her Cash Account will be equal to the balance of the applicable Sub-Account of his or her Cash Account to which the lump sum distribution form applies as of the date of distribution.

 

(ii)            Installments .  The amount of each installment payment from a Participant’s Pre-2005 Sub-Account of the Cash Account will be determined by dividing the balance of the Pre-2005 Sub-Account of the Cash Account as of the date of distribution for such installment payment by the total number of remaining payments (including the current payment).  The amount of each installment payment from a Participant’s Post-2004 Sub-Account of the Cash Account will be determined by dividing the balance of the Post-2004 Sub-Account of the Cash Account to which the installment distribution form applies as of the date of distribution for such installment payment by the total number of the remaining payments (including the current payment).

 

12



 

(b)            Amount of Distribution for Share Account .

 

(i)             Lump Sum .  A lump sum payment from a Participant’s applicable Sub-Account of his or her Share Account will consist of the number of Shares equal to the number of Share Units credited to the applicable Sub-Account of his or her Share Account to which the lump sum distribution form applies as of the date of distribution, rounded up to the next whole Share.

 

(ii)            Installments .  Each installment payment from a Participant’s Pre-2005 Sub-Account of the Share Account will consist of the number of Shares determined by dividing the number of whole Share Units credited to the Pre-2005 Sub-Account of the Share Account to which the installment distribution form applies as of the distribution date for such installment distribution by the total number of remaining payments (including the current payment) and rounding the quotient up to the next whole Share.  Each installment payment from a Participant’s Post-2004 Sub-Account of the Share Account will consist of the number of Shares determined by dividing the number of whole Share Units credited to the Post-2004 Sub-Account that are subject to the installment distribution form as of the date of distribution for such installment payment by the total number of the remaining payments (including the current payment) and rounding the quotient up to the next whole Share.

 

(c)            Reduction of Account Balance .  The balance of the applicable Sub-Account of the Cash or Share Account from which a distribution is made will be reduced, as of the date of distribution, by the cash amount or number of Shares distributed.

 

9.              Terms of Options Granted Under the Plan .  All Periodic Options granted under the Plan will be governed by the following terms and conditions:

 

9.1           Non-Statutory Options .  All Periodic Options granted under the Plan will be non-statutory stock options not entitled to special tax treatment under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended to date and as may be amended from time to time (the “Code”).

 

9.2           Option Exercise Price .  The exercise price per Share purchasable under a Periodic Option granted under the Plan will be equal to 100% of the Market Price on the date of grant of the Periodic Option.

 

9.3           Exercisability of Options .  Each Periodic Option granted under the Plan will become exercisable, on a cumulative basis, as to 25% of the Shares (excluding any fractional portion less than one share), on the last day of each of the first, second and third three-month periods following its Date of Grant and as to the remaining Shares on the last day of the fourth three-month period following the Date of Grant; provided, however, that if a Change in Control of the Company occurs then such Periodic Option will become immediately exercisable in full.

 

9.4           Duration of Options .  Each Periodic Option granted under the Plan will terminate ten years after its Date of Grant; provided, however, that if the Participant ceases to serve as a director of the Company for any reason, then the Periodic Option will remain exercisable to the extent exercisable as of such cessation of service until the earlier of the expiration of five years

 

13



 

after the date the Participant ceased to serve as a director of the Company or the remaining term of the Periodic Option.

 

9.5           Manner of Option Exercise .  A Periodic Option granted under the Plan may be exercised by a Participant in whole or in part from time to time, subject to the conditions contained in the Plan, by delivering in person, by facsimile or electronic transmission or through the mail notice of exercise to the Company at its principal executive office in St. Paul, Minnesota, and by paying in full the total exercise price for the Shares to be purchased in accordance with Section 9.6.  Such notice will specify the particular Periodic Option that is being exercised (by the date of grant and total number of Shares subject to the Periodic Option) and the number of Shares with respect to which the Periodic Option is being exercised.

 

9.6           Payment of Exercise Price .  The total purchase price of the shares to be purchased upon exercise of a Periodic Option granted under the Plan will be paid entirely in cash (including check, bank draft or money order); provided, however, that the Administrator, in its sole discretion and upon terms and conditions established by the Administrator, may allow such payments to be made, in whole or in part, by tender of a Broker Exercise Notice, by tender, or attestation as to ownership, of Previously Acquired Shares, or by a combination of such methods.  For purposes of such payment, Previously Acquired Shares tendered or covered by an attestation will be valued at the Market Price on the exercise date.

 

9.7           Restrictions on Transfer .

 

(a)            Except pursuant to testamentary will or the laws of descent and distribution or as otherwise expressly permitted by Sections 9.7(b) and (c), no right or interest of any Participant in a Periodic Option granted under the Plan prior to the exercise of such Periodic Option will be assignable or transferable, or subjected to any lien, during the lifetime of the Participant, either voluntarily or involuntarily, directly or indirectly, by operation of law or otherwise.

 

(b)            A Participant will be entitled to designate a beneficiary to receive a Periodic Option granted under the Plan upon such Participant’s death, and in the event of a Participant’s death, payment of any amounts due under the Plan will be made to, and exercise of any Periodic Options (to the extent permitted pursuant to Section 13) may be made by, the Participant’s legal representatives, heirs and legatees.

 

(c)            A Participant who is a director of the Company will be entitled to transfer all or a portion of a Periodic Option granted under the Plan, other than for value, to such Participant’s child, stepchild, grandchild, parent, stepparent, grandparent, spouse, former spouse, sibling, niece, nephew, mother-in-law, father-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, or sister-in-law, any person sharing such Participant’s household (other than a tenant or employee), a trust in which any of the foregoing have more than fifty percent of the beneficial interests, a foundation in which any of the foregoing (or the Participant) control the management of assets, and any other entity in which these persons (or the Participant) own more than fifty percent of the voting interests.  Any permitted transferee will remain subject to all the terms and conditions applicable to the Participant prior to the transfer.  A permitted transfer may be conditioned upon such

 

14



 

requirements as the Administrator may, in its sole discretion, determine, including, but not limited to execution and/or delivery of appropriate acknowledgements, opinion of counsel, or other documents by the transferee.

 

9.8           Rights as a Stockholder .  No Participant will have any rights as a stockholder with respect to any Shares covered by a Periodic Option granted under the Plan until the Participant has exercised such Periodic Option, paid the exercise price and become the holder of record of such Shares, and, except as otherwise provided in Section 17.3, no adjustments will be made for dividends or other distributions or other rights as to which there is a record date preceding the date the Participant becomes the holder of record of such Shares.

 

9.9           Cash Payment for Options .  If a Change in Control of the Company occurs, then the Board, without the consent of any Participant affected thereby, may determine that some or all Participants holding outstanding Periodic Options granted under the Plan will receive, with respect to some or all of the Shares subject to such Periodic Options, as of the effective date of any Change in Control of the Company, cash in an amount equal to the excess of the Market Price of such Shares immediately prior to the effective date of such Change in Control of the Company over the exercise price per share of such Periodic Options.

 

10.           Effects of Actions Constituting Cause .  Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, if a Participant is determined by the Board, acting in its sole discretion, to have committed any action which would constitute Cause as defined in Section 15.8, irrespective of whether such action or the Board’s determination occurs before or after such Participant ceases to serve as a director of the Company, all rights of the Participant under the Plan attributable to unexercised Periodic Options granted under Section 9 and any agreements evidencing a Periodic Option then held by the Participant will terminate and be forfeited without notice of any kind.  Benefits attributable to amounts credited to a Participant’s Account pursuant to Sections 4 and 5 and any earnings credited with respect to such amounts pursuant to Sections 6.1 and 6.2 will not be forfeited.

 

11.           Source of Payments; Nature of Interest .

 

11.1         Establishment of Trust .  The Company may establish a Trust with an independent corporate trustee.  The Trust must be a grantor trust with respect to which the Company is treated as grantor for purposes of Code Section 677 and must provide that, upon the insolvency of the Company, Trust assets will be used to satisfy claims of the Company’s general creditors.  The Company will pay all taxes of any and all kinds whatsoever payable in respect of the Trust assets or any transaction with respect to the Trust assets.  The Company may from time to time transfer to the Trust cash, marketable securities or other property acceptable to the Trustee in accordance with the terms of the Trust. The trustee of the Trust shall not be permitted to locate any portion of the Trust assets outside of the United States in violation of Section 409A(b)(1) of the Code.

 

11.2         Source of Payments .  The Trustee will make distributions to Participants and Beneficiaries from the Trust in satisfaction of the Company’s obligations under the Plan in accordance with the terms of the Trust.  The Company is responsible for paying, from its general assets, any benefits attributable to a Participant’s Account that are not paid by the Trust.

 

15



 

11.3         Status of Plan .  Nothing contained in the Plan or Trust is to be construed as providing for assets to be held for the benefit of any Participant or any other person or persons to whom benefits are to be paid pursuant to the terms of the Plan, the Participant’s or other person’s only interest under the Plan being the right to receive the benefits set forth herein.  The Trust is established only for the convenience of the Company and the Participants, and no Participant has any interest in the assets of the Trust prior to distribution of such assets pursuant to the Plan.  Until such time as Shares are distributed to a Participant, Beneficiary of a deceased Participant or other person, he or she has no rights as a shareholder with respect to any Share Units credited to a Share Account pursuant to the Plan.  To the extent that the Participant or any other person acquires a right to receive benefits under the Plan or the Trust, such right is no greater than the right of any unsecured general creditor of the Company.

 

11.4         Non-Assignability of Benefits .  Except as provided in Section 9.7, the benefits payable under the Plan and the right to receive future benefits under the Plan may not be anticipated, alienated, sold, transferred, assigned, pledged, encumbered, or subjected to any charge or legal process.

 

12.           Payment of Withholding Taxes .

 

12.1         General Rules .  The Company and the Trustee are entitled to (a) withhold and deduct from any compensation, deferral and/or benefit payment pursuant to the Plan and other amounts that may be due and owing to the Participant or Beneficiary from the Company, or make other arrangements for the collection of, all amounts the Company reasonably determines are necessary to satisfy any and all federal, state and local withholding and other tax requirements attributable to the Plan and a Periodic Option, including, without limitation, the grant or exercise of a Periodic Option, or (b) require the Participant promptly to remit the amount of such withholding to the Company before taking any action, including issuing any Shares, with respect to a Periodic Option.

 

12.2         Special Rules .  The Company or the Trustee, as the case may be, in its sole discretion and upon terms and conditions established by the Company or the Trustee, as the case may be, may permit or require a Participant to satisfy, in whole or in part, any withholding or other tax obligation described in Section 12.1 by having such amounts withheld from any compensation, deferral and/or benefit payment pursuant to the Plan, by remitting such amounts to the Company or the Trustee, by electing to tender, or attest as to ownership of, Previously Acquired Shares, by delivery of a Broker Exercise Notice or a combination of such methods.  For purposes of satisfying a Participant’s withholding or other tax obligation, Previously Acquired Shares tendered or covered by an attestation will be valued at their Market Price.

 

13.           Securities Law and Other Restrictions .  Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan or any agreements entered into pursuant to the Plan to the contrary, neither the Company nor the Trustee is required to issue or distribute any Shares under the Plan, and a Participant or distributee may not sell, assign, transfer or otherwise dispose of Shares issued or distributed pursuant to the Plan, unless (a) there is in effect with respect to such Shares a registration statement under the Securities Act and any applicable securities laws of a state or foreign jurisdiction or an exemption from such registration under the Securities Act and applicable state

 

16



 

or foreign securities laws, and (b) there has been obtained any other consent, approval or permit from any other regulatory body which the Company, in its sole discretion, deems necessary or advisable.  The Company or the Trustee may condition such issuance, distribution, sale or transfer upon the receipt of any representations or agreements from the parties involved, and the placement of any legends on certificates representing Shares, as may be deemed necessary or advisable by the Company in order to comply with such securities law or other restrictions.

 

14.           Amendment and Termination .

 

14.1         Amendment .

 

(a)            The Company reserves the right to amend the Plan at any time to any extent that it may deem advisable.  To be effective, an amendment must be stated in a written instrument approved in advance or ratified by the Board and executed in the name of the Company by its Chief Executive Officer or President and attested by the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary.

 

(b)            An amendment adopted in accordance with Section 14.1(a) is binding on all interested parties as of the effective date stated in the amendment; provided, however, that no amendment will have any retroactive effect so as to deprive any Participant, or the Beneficiary of a deceased Participant, of any benefit to which he or she is entitled under the terms of the Plan in effect immediately prior to the effective date of the amendment, determined as if such Participant had terminated service as a director immediately prior to the effective date of the amendment.  Without limiting the foregoing, the amendments to this Plan effective May 1, 2004: (i) will not affect the rights of Participants to receive a grant of Elective Options on the Annual Meeting Date in 2004 (or on any earlier termination of service) with respect to deferrals into their Option Cash Accounts, and (ii) will not affect the terms of Elective Options so granted or otherwise outstanding at the time of amendment (including the right to receive Reload Options upon exercise), subject,  in each case, to the terms and conditions of the Plan as previously in effect (including definitions of the foregoing capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this amended Plan).

 

(c)            Without limiting Section 14.1(a), the Company reserves the right to amend the Plan to change the method of determining the earnings credited to Participants’ Accounts pursuant to Sections 6.1 and 6.2 and to apply such new method not only with respect to the portion of the Accounts attributable to credits made after the date on which such amendment is adopted but also with respect to the portion of the Accounts attributable to credits made prior to the date on which such amendment is adopted and regardless of whether such new method would result in materially lower earnings credits than the old method.

 

(d)            The provisions of the Plan in effect at the termination of a Participant’s service as a director will, except as otherwise expressly provided by a subsequent amendment, continue to apply to such Participant.

 

17



 

(e)            Notwithstanding the other provisions in this Section 14.1, including any limitation on the right of the Company to amend the Plan in Section 14.1(b), the Company will have the right to amend the Plan as it deems necessary or reasonable (as determined in the sole discretion of the Company) to comply with the requirements of Code Section 409A.

 

14.2         Termination .  The Company reserves the right to terminate the Plan at any time.  The Plan will terminate as of the date specified by the Company in a written instrument by its authorized officers to the Administrator, adopted in the manner of an amendment.  Upon the termination of the Plan, any benefits to which Participants have become entitled prior to the effective date of the termination will continue to be paid in accordance with the provisions of Section 8.  No termination, suspension or amendment of the Plan may adversely affect any outstanding Periodic Option without the consent of the affected Participant; provided, however, that this sentence will not impair the right of the Administrator to take whatever action it deems appropriate under Sections 9 and 17.3 of the Plan.  Periodic Options outstanding upon termination of the Plan may continue to be exercised in accordance with their terms.

 

15.           Definitions .  The definitions set forth in this Section 15 apply unless the context otherwise indicates.

 

15.1         Account .  “Account” means the bookkeeping account or accounts maintained with respect to a Participant pursuant to Section 3. Within each Account or Sub-Account, separate subaccounts shall be maintained to the extent the Administrator determines it to be necessary or desirable for the administration of the Plan.

 

15.2         Administrator .  The “Administrator” of the Plan is the Compensation Committee of the Board or such other committee or person to whom administrative duties are delegated pursuant to the provisions of Section 16.1, as the context requires.

 

15.3         Annual Meeting Date .  “Annual Meeting Date” means the date on which the annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders is held.

 

15.4         Beneficiary .  “Beneficiary” with respect to a Participant is the person designated or otherwise determined under the provisions of Section 8.3 as the distributee of benefits payable after the Participant’s death.  A person designated or otherwise determined to be a Beneficiary under the terms of the Plan has no interest in or right under the Plan until the Participant in question has died.  A person will cease to be a Beneficiary on the day on which all benefits to which he, she or it is entitled under the Plan have been distributed.

 

15.5         Board .  “Board” means the board of directors of the Company.

 

15.6         Broker Exercise Notice .  “Broker Exercise Notice” means a written notice pursuant to which a Participant, upon exercise of an Option, irrevocably instructs a broker or dealer to sell a sufficient number of shares or loan a sufficient amount of money to pay all or a portion of the exercise price of the Option and/or any related withholding tax obligations and remit such sums to the Company and directs the Company to deliver stock certificates to be issued upon such exercise directly to such broker or dealer or their nominee.

 

18



 

15.7         Cash Account .  “Cash Account” means an Account to which deferred amounts are credited pursuant to Sections 4 and 5.2 and earnings thereon are credited pursuant to Section 6.1 in U.S. dollars. As provided under Section 3, the Cash Account will include a Pre-2005 Sub-Account and Post-2004 Sub-Account.

 

15.8         Cause .  “Cause” means dishonesty, fraud, misrepresentation, embezzlement or deliberate injury or attempted injury, in each case related to the Company or any subsidiary or any material breach of any confidentiality or non-compete agreement entered into with the Company or any subsidiary.

 

15.9         Change in Control .  “Change in Control” will be deemed to have occurred if the event set forth in any one of the following paragraphs will have occurred:

 

(a)            any “person” as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the Exchange Act (other than the Company, any trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under any employee benefit plan of the Company, or any corporation owned, directly or indirectly, by the stockholders of the Company in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of stock of the Company), is or becomes, including pursuant to a tender or exchange offer for shares of Common Stock pursuant to which purchases are made, the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing 25% or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities, other than in a transaction arranged or approved by the Board prior to its occurrence; provided, however, that if any such person will become the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing 34% or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities, a Change in Control will be deemed to occur whether or not any or all of such beneficial ownership is obtained in a transaction arranged or approved by the Board prior to its occurrence, and other than in a transaction in which such person will have executed a written agreement with the Company (and approved by the Board) on or prior to the date on which such person becomes the beneficial owner of 25% or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities, which agreement imposes one or more limitations on the amount of such person’s beneficial ownership of shares of Common Stock, if, and so long as, such agreement (or any amendment thereto approved by the Board provided that no such amendment will cure any prior breach of such agreement or any amendment thereto) continues to be binding on such person and such person is in compliance (as determined by the Board in its sole discretion) with the terms of such agreement (including such amendment); provided, however, that if any such person will become the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing 50% or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities, a Change in Control will be deemed to occur whether or not such beneficial ownership was held in compliance with such a binding agreement, and provided further that the provisions of this subparagraph (a) will not be applicable to a transaction in which a corporation becomes the owner of all the Company’s outstanding securities in a transaction which complies with the provisions of subparagraph (c) of this section (e.g., a reverse triangular merger); or

 

19



 

(b)                                  during any 36 consecutive calendar months, individuals who constitute the Board on the first day of such period or any new director (other than a director whose initial assumption of office is in connection with an actual or threatened election contest including, but not limited to, a consent solicitation, relating to the election of directors of the Company) whose appointment or election by the Board or nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders was approved or recommended by a vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the directors then still in office who either were directors on the first day of such period, or whose appointment, election or nomination for election was previously so approved or recommended, shall cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority thereof; or

 

(c)                                   there is consummated a merger or consolidation of the Company or any direct or indirect subsidiary of the Company with any other corporation, other than a merger or consolidation which would result in the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior to such merger or consolidation continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity or any parent thereof) more than 50% of the combined voting power of the securities of the Company or such surviving entity or any parent thereof outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation, and in which no “person” (as defined under subparagraph (a) above) acquires 50% or more of the combined voting power of the securities of the Company or such surviving entity or parent thereof outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation; or

 

(d)                                  the stockholders of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company or there is consummated an agreement for the sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets, other than a sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets to an entity, more than 50% of the combined voting power of the voting securities of which are owned by stockholders of the Company in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of the Company immediately prior to such sale.

 

15.10                  Code .  “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.  Any reference to a specific provision of the Code includes a reference to that provision as it may be amended from time to time and to any successor provision.

 

15.11                  Company .  “Company” means Ecolab Inc.

 

15.12                  Credit Date .  “Credit Date” means the date on which compensation, deferral and earnings credits to a Cash or Share Account are made pursuant to Sections 5 and 6, which is usually on the last day of a Credit Period.

 

15.13                  Credit Period .  “Credit Period” means a period of one calendar quarter, beginning on each January 1, April 1, July 1, and October 1 and ending on each March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31; provided, however, that the first Credit Period following the May 1, 2004 amendments to this Plan shall commence as of such date and end on June 30, 2004.

 

15.14                  Disability .   “Disability” means:

 

20



 

(a)                                  For purposes of Section 8.1(a), the total disability of a Qualified Director.  Such total disability will be deemed to have occurred if the Administrator finds on the basis of medical evidence satisfactory to it that the Qualified Director is prevented from engaging in any suitable gainful employment or occupation and that such disability will be permanent and continuous during the remainder of his or her life; and

 

(b)                                  For purposes of Section 8.4, that, by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months, the Participant is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity.

 

15.15                  Election Period .  “Election Period” means a period of one calendar year, commencing on each January 1 and ending on each December 31; provided, however, that the first Election Period following the May 1, 2004 amendments to this Plan shall commence as of such date and end on December 31, 2004.

 

15.16                  Market Price .  “Market Price” means the average of the high and low sale prices of a Share during the regular trading session on a specified date or, if Shares were not then traded, during the regular trading session on the most recent prior date when Shares were traded, all as quoted in The Wall Street Journal reports of New York Stock Exchange - Composite Transactions.

 

15.17                  Option Exercise Shares .  “Option Exercise Shares” means Shares that are issuable upon the exercise of a Periodic Option that is: (i) currently held by, or later issued to, an individual who is a Qualified Director as of October 31, 2008; or (ii) issued after October 31, 2008 to an individual who subsequently becomes a Qualified Director after October 31, 2008.  For purposes of Section 9.6, Option Exercise Shares will be valued at the Market Price on the exercise date.

 

15.18                  Other Director Compensation .  “Other Director Compensation” means all cash amounts payable by the Company to a Qualified Director for his or her services to the Company as a Qualified Director, (a) including, without limitation, the Retainer and fees specifically paid for attending regular or special meetings of the Board and Board committees or for acting as the chair of a committee, but (b) excluding expense allowances or reimbursements and insurance premiums.

 

15.19                  Participant .  “Participant” is a current or former Qualified Director who has been granted a Periodic Option under the Plan or whose Account amounts have been credited pursuant to Section 4, 5 or 6 and who has not ceased to be a Participant pursuant to Section 2.4.

 

15.20                  Periodic Option .  “Periodic Option” means an option to purchase Shares granted to Qualified Directors from time to time pursuant to Section 7.

 

15.21                  Plan .  “Plan” means the Ecolab Inc. 2001 Non-Employee Director Stock Option and Deferred Compensation Plan, as from time to time amended or restated.

 

15.22                  Plan Rules .  “Plan Rules” are rules, policies, practices or procedures adopted by the Administrator pursuant to Section 16.2.

 

21



 

15.23                  Previously Acquired Shares .  “Previously Acquired Shares” means Shares that (i) are already owned by the Participant and that are, by virtue of the Participant’s holding period or other attributes, acceptable to the Administrator; or (ii) are Option Exercise Shares.

 

15.24                  Prime Rate .  “Prime Rate” means the Bloomberg Prime Rate Composite (“Prime Rate by Country US—BB Comp”).

 

15.25                  Prior Deferred Compensation Plans .  “Prior Deferred Compensation Plans” means the Company’s 1997 Non-Employee Director Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended, and the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, as amended.

 

15.26                  Qualified Director .  “Qualified Director” means an individual who is a member of the Board and who is not an employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries.

 

15.27                  Retainer .  “Retainer” means the amount payable by the Company to a Qualified Director for holding office as a Qualified Director, exclusive of fees specifically paid for attending regular or special meetings of the Board and Board committees, fees for acting as chair of the Board or a Board committee, expense allowances or reimbursements, insurance premiums, charitable gift matching contributions and any other payments that are determined by reference to factors other than holding office as a Qualified Director.

 

15.28                  Securities Act .  “Securities Act” means the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.  Any reference to a specific provision of the Securities Act includes a reference to that provision as it may be amended from time to time and to any successor provision.

 

15.29                  Share Account .  “Share Account” means an Account to which credits are made pursuant to Section 5.1, deferred amounts are credited pursuant to Sections 4 and 5.2 and earnings are credited pursuant to Section 6.2 in Share Units.  As provided under Section 3, the Share Account will include a Pre-2005 Sub-Account and Post-2004 Sub-Account.

 

15.30                  Share Unit Compensation .  “Share Unit Compensation” means the compensation paid to Qualified Directors in the form of credits to their Share Accounts pursuant to Section 5.1.

 

15.31                  Share Units .  “Share Units” means a unit credited to a Participant’s Share Account pursuant to Sections 4, 5.1, 5.2 and 6.2, each of which represents the economic equivalent of one Share.  A Participant will not have any rights as a stockholder with respect to Share Units until the Participant is distributed Shares pursuant to Section 8 of the Plan.

 

15.32                  Shares .  “Shares” means shares of common stock of the Company, $1.00 par value, or such other class or kind of shares or other securities as may be applicable pursuant to Section 17.3.

 

15.33                  Sub-Account .  “Sub-Account” refers to the Participant’s Pre-2005 Sub-Account, accounting for those amounts deferred into the Plan prior January 1, 2005 (and related earnings credits), the Participant’s Post-2004 Sub-Account, accounting for those amounts deferred into the Plan after December 31, 2004 (and related earnings), or both as the context requires. Within each Sub-Account, separate subaccounts shall be maintained to the extent the Administrator determines it to be necessary or desirable for the administration of the Plan.

 

22



 

15.34                  Termination of Service .  For purposes of distribution of a Participant’s Post-2004 Sub-Account, ‘Termination of Service’ means the individual has ceased to be a member of the Board and has ceased to provide services as an independent contractor (including as a member of the board of directors) of the Company and any other entity with whom the Company would be treated as a single employer under Section 414(b) or 414(c) of the Code.  In all cases, the individual’s Termination of Service must constitute a ‘separation from service’ under Section 409A of the Code.

 

15.35                  Trust .  “Trust” means any trust or trusts established by the Company pursuant to Section 11.1 of the Plan.

 

15.36                  Trustee .  “Trustee” means the independent corporate trustee or trustees that at the relevant time has or have been appointed to act as Trustee of the Trust.

 

15.37                  Unforeseeable Emergency .  W ith respect to a Participant’s Post-2004 Sub-Accounts, “Unforeseeable Emergency” shall mean an event which results in a severe financial hardship to the Participant as a consequence of (1) an illness or accident of the Participant, the Participant’s spouse,  or a dependent within the meaning of Code Section 152, (2) loss of the Participant’s property due to casualty or (3) other similar extraordinary and unforeseeable circumstances arising as a result of events beyond the control of the Participant.  With respect to a Participant’s Pre-2005 Sub-Accounts, “Unforeseeable Emergency” shall mean an unanticipated emergency that is caused by an event beyond the Participant’s control resulting in a severe financial hardship that cannot be satisfied through other means.  The existence of an Unforeseeable Emergency will be determined by the Administrator.

 

16.                                Administration .

 

16.1                         Administrator .  The general administration of the Plan and the duty to carry out its provisions will be vested in the Compensation Committee of the Board or such other Board committee as may be subsequently designated as Administrator by the Board.  Such committee may delegate such duty or any portion thereof to a named person and may from time to time revoke such authority and delegate it to another person.

 

16.2                         Plan Rules and Regulations .  The Administrator has the discretionary power and authority to make such Plan Rules as the Administrator determines to be consistent with the terms, and advisable in connection with the administration, of the Plan and to modify or rescind any such Plan Rules.  In addition, the Administrator has the discretionary power and authority to limit or modify application of Plan provisions and Plan Rules as the Administrator determines to be advisable to facilitate tax deferral treatment (or accommodate the unavailability thereof) for Options granted to, or amounts credited with respect to, non-U.S. resident Participants.

 

16.3                         Administrator’s Discretion .  The Administrator has the sole discretionary power and authority to make all determinations necessary for administration of the Plan, except those determinations that the Plan requires others to make, and to construe, interpret, apply and enforce the provisions of the Plan and Plan Rules whenever necessary to carry out its intent and purpose and to facilitate its administration, including, without limitation, the discretionary power and authority to remedy ambiguities, inconsistencies, omissions and erroneous benefit

 

23



 

calculations.  In the exercise of its discretionary power and authority, the Administrator will treat all similarly situated persons uniformly.

 

16.4                         Specialist’s Assistance .  The Administrator may retain such actuarial, accounting, legal, clerical and other services as may reasonably be required in the administration of the Plan, and may pay reasonable compensation for such services.  All costs of administering the Plan will be paid by the Company.

 

16.5                         Indemnification .  The Company agrees to indemnify and hold harmless, to the extent permitted by law, each director, officer and employee of the Company and any subsidiary or affiliate of the Company against any and all liabilities, losses, costs and expenses (including legal fees) of every kind and nature that may be imposed on, incurred by, or asserted against such person at any time by reason of such person’s services in connection with the Plan, but only if such person did not act dishonestly or in bad faith or in willful violation of the law or regulations under which such liability, loss, cost or expense arises.  The Company has the right, but not the obligation, to select counsel and control the defense and settlement of any action for which a person may be entitled to indemnification under this provision.

 

17.                                Shares Available for Issuance .

 

17.1                         Maximum Number of Shares Available .  Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 17.3, the maximum number of Shares that will be available for issuance or distribution under the Plan will be 500,000 Shares, plus any Shares which, as of the 2001 Annual Meeting Date, were reserved for issuance under the 1997 Non-Employee Director Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended, and the Company’s 1995 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan and which were not thereafter issued or are not hereafter issued, or which have been issued but are subsequently forfeited and which would otherwise have been available for further issuance under such plans.  The Shares available for issuance or distribution under the Plan may, at the election of the Administrator, be either treasury shares or shares authorized but unissued, and, if treasury shares are used, all references in the Plan to the issuance or distribution of Shares will, for corporate law purposes, be deemed to mean the transfer of shares from treasury.

 

17.2                         Accounting .  Shares that are issued or distributed under the Plan or that are subject to outstanding Periodic Options granted under the Plan or Share Units will be applied to reduce the maximum number of Shares remaining available for issuance or distribution under the Plan.  Any Shares that are subject to a Periodic Option granted under the Plan that lapses, expires, is forfeited or for any reason is terminated unexercised and any Shares that are subject to Share Units in a Share Account that are forfeited pursuant to Section 8.2(c) will automatically again become available for issuance or distribution under the Plan.  To the extent that the exercise price of any Periodic Option granted under the Plan and/or associated tax withholding obligations are paid by tender or attestation as to ownership of Previously Acquired Shares on or before May 11, 2011 (the date ten years following approval of the Plan by the Company’s stockholders), or to the extent that such tax withholding obligations are satisfied by withholding of shares otherwise issuable upon exercise of the Periodic Option, only the number of Shares issued net of the number of Shares tendered, attested to or withheld will be applied to reduce the maximum number of Shares remaining available for issuance under the Plan.

 

24



 

17.3                         Adjustment to Shares, Share Units and Options .  In the event of any reorganization, merger, consolidation, recapitalization, liquidation, reclassification, stock dividend, stock split, combination of shares, rights offering, divestiture or extraordinary dividend (including a spin-off) or any other similar change in the Company’s corporate structure or the Shares, the Administrator (or, if the Company is not the surviving corporation in any such transaction, the board of directors of the surviving corporation) will make appropriate adjustment (which determination will be conclusive) as to the number and kind of securities or other property (including cash) available for issuance or distribution under the Plan and as to the number and kind of Share Units credited to Share Accounts and the number and kind of securities as to which Periodic Options are to be granted and, in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the rights of Participants holding Periodic Options, the number, kind and exercise price of securities subject to outstanding Periodic Options.

 

18.                                Miscellaneous .

 

18.1                         Other Benefits .  Neither amounts deferred nor amounts paid pursuant to the Plan constitute salary or compensation for the purpose of computing benefits under any other benefit plan, practice, policy or procedure of the Company unless otherwise expressly provided thereunder.

 

18.2                         No Warranties Regarding Treatment .  The Company makes no warranties regarding the tax treatment to any person of any deferrals or payments made pursuant to the Plan, and each Participant will hold the Administrator and the Company and their officers, directors, employees, agents and advisors harmless from any liability resulting from any tax position taken in good faith in connection with the Plan.

 

18.3                         No Rights to Continued Service Created .  Neither the establishment of or participation in the Plan gives any individual the right to continued service on the Board or limits the right of the Company or its stockholders to terminate or modify the terms and conditions of service of such individual on the Board or otherwise deal with any individual without regard to the effect that such action might have on him or her with respect to the Plan.

 

18.4                         Successors .  Except as otherwise expressly provided in the Plan, all obligations of the Company under the Plan are binding on any successor to the Company whether the successor is the result of a direct or indirect purchase, merger, consolidation or otherwise of all of the business and/or assets of the Company.

 

18.5                         Cross Reference .  References in the Plan to a particular section refer to that section within the Plan, references within a section of the Plan to a particular subsection refer to that subsection within the same section, and references within a section or subsection to a particular clause refer to that clause within the same section or subsection, as the case may be.

 

18.6                         Number and Gender .  Wherever appropriate, the singular may be read as the plural, the plural may be read as the singular, and one gender may be read as the other gender.

 

18.7                         Governing Law .  Except in connection with matters of corporate governance and authority (which shall be governed by the laws of the Company’s jurisdiction of incorporation), questions pertaining to the construction, validity, effect and enforcement of the Plan will be

 

25



 

determined in accordance with the internal, substantive laws of the State of Minnesota without regard to the conflict of laws rules of the State of Minnesota or any other jurisdiction.

 

18.8                         Headings .  The headings of sections are included solely for convenience of reference; if there exists any conflict between such headings and the text of the Plan, the text will control.

 

26


Exhibit (10.11)

 

ECOLAB SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN

(As Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2014)

 

WHEREAS, the Company previously established the Ecolab Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “Plan”) to provide additional retirement benefits in consideration of services performed and to be performed by certain participants for the Company and certain related corporations; and

 

WHEREAS, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, P.L. 108-357 (the “AJCA”) added a new Section 409A to the Code, which significantly changed the Federal tax law applicable to “amounts deferred” under the Plan after December 31, 2004; and

 

WHEREAS, before the issuance by the U.S. Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) of interpretive guidance with respect to Code Section 409A, the Company amended the Plan to temporarily freeze the accrual of SERP Benefits hereunder as of December 31, 2004; and

 

WHEREAS, the IRS and U.S. Treasury subsequently issued regulations and other guidance regarding the requirements of and compliance with Code Section 409A; and

 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company directed and authorized appropriate officers of the Company to amend the Plan to (a) reinstate the accrual of SERP Benefits, effective retroactively as of January 1, 2005 and (b) comply, with respect to the Non-Grand fathered SERP Benefits, with the requirements of Code Section 409 and guidance issued thereunder; and

 

WHEREAS, the Plan was amended and restated in its entirety, effective as of January 1, 2005; and

 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized the appropriate officers of the Company to amend the Plan (i) to use the lump sum actuarial factors to determine the annual installment payment amount (including an increase in installment payments that were commenced prior to January 1, 2011), and (ii) to include an actuarial increase in the non-grandfathered portion of any payments that are required to be deferred as a result of the five (5) year redeferral rule to a date that is after the later of Separation from Service or age 62; and

 

WHEREAS, the Plan was amended and restated in its entirety effective as of December 31, 2010; and

 

WHEREAS, the Plan was amended and restated in its entirety effective as of January 1, 2011 to clarify ambiguous language in the Plan document; and

 

WHEREAS, the Company wishes to amend the date that subsequent distribution elections become irrevocable under the Plan and the date by which an actuarially equivalent optional form of annuity may be selected.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Plan and Section 5.1 of the Ecolab Inc. Administrative Document for Non-Qualified Benefit Plans, the Company hereby amends and restates the Plan in its entirety, effective as of January 1, 2014, to read as follows:

 



 

ARTICLE I
PREFACE

 

Section 1.1                                     Effective Date .

 

(1)                                  The effective date of this amended and restated Plan is January 1, 2014.

 

(2)                                  The benefit, if any, payable with respect to a former Executive who Retired or died prior to January 1, 2005 (and who is not rehired by a member of the Controlled Group thereafter) shall be determined by, and paid in accordance with, the terms and provisions of the Plan as in effect prior to January 1, 2005, subject to Sections 1.4 and 3.3(2)(c).  Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, an Executive’s SERP Benefit (which was temporarily frozen from December 31, 2004 through December 31, 2008) shall be retroactively adjusted on January 1, 2009 to reflect the benefit that would have been accrued by the Executive under the Plan, in accordance with Section 3.2, during the period commencing on January 1, 2005 and ending on the earlier of December 31, 2008 or the date on which the Executive terminated his services with the Employers as an employee.

 

Section 1.2                                     Purpose of the Plan .  The purpose of this Plan is to provide additional retirement benefits for certain management and highly compensated employees of the Company who perform management and professional functions for the Company and certain related entities.

 

Section 1.3                                     Administrative Document .  This Plan includes the Ecolab Inc. Administrative Document for Non-Qualified Benefit Plans (the “Administrative Document”), which is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Section 1.4                                     American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (AJCA) .

 

(1)                                  To the extent applicable, it is intended that the Plan (including all Amendments thereto) comply with the provisions of Code Section 409A, as enacted by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, P.L. 108-357 (the “AJCA”), so as to prevent the inclusion in gross income of any amount of SERP Benefit accrued hereunder in a taxable year that is prior to the taxable year or years in which such amounts would otherwise be actually distributed or made available to the Executives.  The Plan shall be administered in a manner that will comply with Code Section 409A, including regulations or any other guidance issued by the Secretary of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service with respect thereto (collectively with the AJCA, the “409A Guidance”).  All Plan provisions shall be interpreted in a manner consistent with the 409A Guidance.

 

(2)                                  The Administrator shall not take any action hereunder that would violate any provision of Code Section 409A.  The Administrator is authorized to adopt rules or regulations deemed necessary or appropriate in connection with the 409A Guidance to anticipate and/or comply with the requirements thereof (including any transition or grandfather rules thereunder).

 

(3)                                  Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan, any Grandfathered SERP Benefits (including any Pre-Retirement SERP Benefits attributable thereto) shall continue to be governed by the law applicable to nonqualified deferred compensation prior to the addition of Section 409A to the Code and shall be subject to the terms and conditions specified in the Plan as in effect prior to January 1, 2005, except as otherwise provided herein.  Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, neither the Company nor the Administrator guarantee to any Executive or Death Beneficiary any specific tax consequences of participation in or entitlement to or receipt of benefits from, the Plan, and each Executive or the Executive’s Death Beneficiary shall be solely responsible for payment of any taxes or penalties incurred in connection with his participation in the Plan.

 

2



 

ARTICLE II
DEFINITIONS

 

Words and phrases used herein with initial capital letters which are defined in the Pension Plan or the Administrative Document are used herein as so defined, unless otherwise specifically defined herein or the context clearly indicates otherwise.  The following words and phrases when used in this Plan with initial capital letters shall have the following respective meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:

 

Section 2.1                                  Actuarial Equivalent ” or “ Actuarially Equivalent .”  A benefit is the “Actuarial Equivalent” of another benefit if, on the basis of Actuarial Factors, the present values of such benefits are equal.

 

Section 2.2                                     Actuarial Factors ” shall mean the actuarial assumptions set forth in Exhibit A which is attached to and forms a part of this Plan.

 

Section 2.3                                     Cash Balance Participant ” shall mean an Executive for whom a Retirement Account is maintained under the Pension Plan.

 

Section 2.4                                     Death Beneficiary .”

 

The term “Death Beneficiary” shall mean the beneficiary designated under this Plan and the Mirror Pension Plan.  The designation of a Death Beneficiary may be made, and may be revoked or changed only by an instrument (in form prescribed by Administrator) signed by the Executive and delivered to the Administrator during the Executive’s lifetime.  If the Executive is married on the date of his death and has been married to such spouse throughout the one-year period ending on the date of his death, his designation of a Death Beneficiary other than, or in addition to, his spouse under the Plan shall not be effective unless such spouse has consented in writing to such designation.  Any Mirror Pension Benefits remaining to be paid after the death of a Death Beneficiary (or a contingent Death Beneficiary, to the extent designated by the Executive) shall be paid to the Death Beneficiary’s estate.  If no Death Beneficiary is designated by the Executive or all the designated Death Beneficiaries predeceased the Executive, the Executive’s Death Beneficiary shall be his spouse, and if there is no surviving spouse, then the Executive’s estate.  The most recent Death Beneficiary designation on file with the Administrator will be given effect, and in the event of conflicting forms files simultaneously under this Plan and Mirror Pension Plan, the Death Beneficiary designation under this Plan will govern.

 

Section 2.5                                     Disability ” or “ Disabled ” shall mean any medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than six months, where such impairment causes the Executive to be unable to perform the duties of his position of employment or any substantially similar position of employment.

 

Section 2.6                                     Executive ” shall mean an Employee who is an elected corporate officer of an Employer and who is selected by the Administrator to participate in the Plan or such other Employee who is selected by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company to participate in the Plan.

 

Section 2.7                                     Final Average Compensation ” shall mean the average of an Executive’s Annual Compensation (as defined in the Administrative Document but as modified by the next sentence) for the five (5) consecutive Plan Years of employment with the Employers preceding the date on which the Executive terminated his services with all Employers as an employee or death (including the year in which the Executive so terminated his service or death) which yields the highest average compensation.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, for purposes of calculating the Final Annual Compensation of a Disabled

 

3



 

Executive, the rules applicable for determining the Final Annual Compensation for persons who accrue benefits under the Final Average Compensation formula specified in Section 4.6 of the Pension Plan shall apply.  If an Executive has been employed by the Employers for a period of less than five (5) Plan Years preceding the date on which the Executive terminated his services with all Employers or death, Final Average Compensation shall be calculated using the Executive’s total period of employment with the Employers (calculated using complete months of employment).

 

Section 2.8                                     Grandfathered SERP Benefit ” shall mean the portion of an Executive’s SERP Benefit that is deemed to have been deferred (within the meaning of the 409A Guidance) under the Plan before January 1, 2005 and that is equal to the present value as of December 31, 2004 of the vested SERP Benefit to which the Executive would be entitled under the Plan, as in effect on October 3, 2004, if the Executive voluntarily terminated employment with the Controlled Group without cause on December 31, 2004 and received a payment, on the earliest possible date allowed under the Plan, of his SERP Benefit in the form with the maximum value.  A Grandfathered SERP Benefit shall be increased in subsequent years to equal the present value of the benefit the Executive actually becomes entitled to receive, in the form and at the time actually paid, determined under the terms of the Plan as in effect on October 3, 2004, without regard to any services rendered or Compensation increases applicable after December 31, 2004.

 

Section 2.9                                     Mirror Pension Benefit ” shall mean one-twelfth (l/12th) of the annual total benefit payable to an Executive under the Ecolab Mirror Pension Plan calculated on a single life annuity basis commencing at age 65, as determined by the Administrator.

 

Section 2.10                              Non-Grandfathered SERP Benefit ” shall mean any SERP Benefit that is not a Grandfathered SERP Benefit.

 

Section 2.11                              Pension Benefit ” shall mean one-twelfth (1/12th) of the annual total pensions paid or payable to the Executive under any pension plan (other than the Ecolab Savings Plan, as such plan may be amended from time to time) sponsored by a member of the Controlled Group which satisfies the qualification requirements of the Code calculated on a single life annuity basis commencing at age 65, as determined by the Administrator including (a) projected payments from any former pension plan or former profit sharing plan which reduces the pension payable under the Pension Plan, or (b) payments of Retirement Account benefits under the Pension Plan.

 

Section 2.12                              Plan ” shall mean this Ecolab Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as it may be amended from time to time.

 

Section 2.13                              Primary Insurance Amount ” shall mean the monthly primary social security benefit to which the Executive will be entitled at age 65, determined in accordance with Exhibit B which is attached to and forms a part of this Plan.

 

Section 2.14                              Retirement ” or “ Retired .”  The Retirement of an Executive shall occur upon his termination of employment for any reason other than death or Disability on or after (1) his attainment of age 55 and the completion of at least 10 Years of Eligibility Service, or (2) his attainment of age 65.  For purposes of determining Retirement under this Plan, the employment of a Disabled Executive shall be deemed to have terminated “for reasons other than Disability” twelve months after the Executive becomes Disabled, provided he does not resume active employment with the Controlled Group before such date.

 

Section 2.15                              Savings Plan Benefit ” shall mean the benefit payable to the Executive calculated as of July 1, 1994 in accordance with Exhibit C which is attached to and forms a part of this Plan.

 

4



 

Section 2.16                              Separation from Service ” or to “ Separate from Service ” shall mean any termination of employment with the Controlled Group due to retirement, death, disability or other reason; provided, however, that no Separation from Service is deemed to occur while the Executive (1) is on military leave, sick leave, or other bona fide leave of absence that does not exceed six (6) months (or, in the case of Disability, twelve (12) months), or if longer, the period during which the Executive’s right to reemployment with the Controlled Group is provided either by statute or by contract, or (2) continues to perform services for the Controlled Group at an annual rate of fifty percent (50%) or more of the average level of services performed over the immediately preceding 36-month period (or the full period in which the Executive provided services (whether as an employee or as an independent contractor) if the Executive has been providing services for less than 36 months).  With respect to the terms of the Plan affecting Non-Grandfathered SERP Benefits, any reference to “termination of employment” in the Plan shall mean Separation from Service as defined in this Section.  Whether an Executive has incurred a Separation from Service shall be determined in accordance with the 409A Guidance.

 

Section 2.17                              SERP Benefit ” shall mean the retirement benefit determined under Article III.

 

Section 2.18                              SERP Pre-Retirement Benefit ” shall mean the pre-retirement benefit determined under Article IV.

 

Section 2.19                              Specified Employee ” shall mean “Specified Employee” as defined in the Administrative Document.

 

Section 2.20                              Year of Benefit Service .”

 

(1)                                  An Executive shall be credited with one Year of Benefit Service for each year of “Credited Service” (or such other defined term which is used to determine service for benefit accrual purposes) as defined by and credited to the Executive under the Pension Plan.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, for purposes of calculating Years of Benefit Service for a Cash Balance Participant, the rules applicable for determining Credited Service under the Pension Plan for persons who accrue benefits under the Final Average Compensation formula specified in Article 4 of the Pension Plan shall apply.

 

(2)                                  A Disabled Executive shall continue to accrue Years of Benefit Service during the period of twelve months following the date on which he becomes Disabled for purposes of determining the amount of his SERP Benefit hereunder.

 

(3)                                  In no event shall an Executive’s Years of Benefit Service under the Plan exceed thirty (30) years.

 

Section 2.21                              Year of Eligibility Service .”

 

(1)                                  An Executive shall be credited with one Year of Eligibility Service for each year of “Continuous Service” (or such other defined term which is used to determine service for vesting purposes) as defined by and credited to the Executive under the Pension Plan.

 

(2)                                  A Disabled Executive shall continue to accrue Years of Eligibility Service during the first twelve months of his Disability for purposes of determining his vested interest in of his SERP Benefit hereunder.

 

Section 2.22                              Year of Past Service Credit ” means the excess, if any, of the thirty (30) Years of Benefit Service required to earn the maximum SERP Benefit hereunder over the number of Years of

 

5



 

Benefit Service it would be possible for the Executive to accumulate by his attainment of age 65 or, if later, the date of his Retirement.

 

ARTICLE III
SERP BENEFITS

 

Section 3.1                                     Participation .

 

(1)                                  Commencement of Participation .  Any Employee who as of the Effective Date is a participant in the Plan, shall continue to participate, subject to Subsection (2).  Any other Employee shall become a participant in the Plan as of the first date on or after the Effective Date on which he is an Executive.

 

(2)                                  Termination of Participation .  An Executive shall cease to be a participant in the Plan on the earliest to occur of (a) the date the Executive ceases to be employed by the Controlled Group or dies before becoming vested in his SERP Benefit, or (b) the date on which the Executive’s SERP Benefit is distributed from the Plan.

 

Section 3.2                                     Amount of SERP Benefits .  Each vested Executive shall, upon termination of employment (Separation from Service with respect to the Non-Grandfathered SERP Benefit), be entitled to a SERP Benefit which shall be determined as hereinafter provided.

 

(1)                                  The SERP Benefit shall be a monthly retirement benefit payable in the form of a fifteen-year (15) certain benefit commencing upon the Executive’s attainment of age 65 equal to the sum of (a) and (b), where:

 

(a)   =                  one-twelfth (1/12 th ) of the Executive’s Final Average Compensation, multiplied by two percent (2%) for each of the Executive’s Years of Benefit Service (up to a maximum of thirty (30)), reduced by (i) the Pension Benefit, (ii) the Mirror Pension Benefit, (iii) fifty percent (50%) of the Primary Insurance Amount, and (iv) the Savings Plan Benefit; and

 

(b)   =                  the difference between (i) one-twelfth (1/12 th ) of the Executive’s Final Average Compensation, and (ii) one-twelfth (1/12 th ) of the Executive’s Annual Compensation for the Plan Year in which the Executive commenced employment with the Controlled Group, such difference multiplied by one percent (1%) for each of the Executive’s Years of Past Service Credit (if any).

 

(2)                                  For purposes of Subsection (l)(b)(ii), if the Executive was not an Employee for the entire Plan Year, his Annual Compensation for such Plan Year shall be annualized based on the number of days employed by the Controlled Group out of a Plan Year of 365 days.

 

(3)                                  Notwithstanding anything in this Section 3.2 to the contrary, in no event will any Executive’s SERP Benefit be less than such Executive’s Grandfathered SERP Benefit.

 

(4)                                  Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 3.2, the SERP Benefit shall be frozen as of December 31, 2020.  In connection with the freezing of benefit accruals under the SERP as of December 31, 2020, in applying the formula in Section 3.2(1), an Executive’s Final Average Compensation, Years of Benefit Service, Pension Benefit, Mirror Pension Benefit, Primary Insurance Amount and Savings Plan Benefit will each be determined as of December 31, 2020 (or if earlier, as of

 

6



 

the Executive’s termination of employment (Separation from Service with respect to the Non-Grandfathered SERP Benefit)).

 

Section 3.3                                     Time of Payment .

 

(1)                                  Grandfathered SERP Benefit .  The provisions of this Section 3.3(1) shall apply solely with respect to the portion of an Executive’s SERP Benefit that is a Grandfathered SERP Benefit.  Payment of any portion of an Executive’s SERP Benefit that is a Non-Grandfathered SERP Benefit shall be made in accordance with Section 3.3(2).

 

(a)                                  In General .  An Executive’s SERP Benefit shall be paid or commence to be paid within 90 days after the later of the date the Executive attains age 65 or the date of the Executive’s Retirement.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, if payment at such time is prevented due to reasons outside of the Administrator’s control, the SERP Benefits shall commence to be paid as soon as practicable after the end of such 90-day period, and the first payment hereunder shall include any SERP Benefits not paid as a result of the delay in payment.

 

(b)                                  Early Commencement .  Notwithstanding the provisions of Subsection (1)(a) of this Section, upon the written request of the Executive (on a form prescribed by the Administrator) which is filed with the Administrator prior to the Executive’s termination of employment with the Controlled Group because of involuntary termination, death or Disability or at least one (1) year prior to the Executive’s voluntary Retirement, the Administrator may, in its complete and sole discretion, commence payment of the SERP Benefits to the Executive at a specified date which is after the Executive’s Retirement but prior to the Executive’s attainment of age 65; provided, however, that the amount of the SERP Benefit shall be reduced by one/two hundred and eightieth (1/280th) for each month that the date of the commencement of the SERP Benefits precedes the date on which the Executive will attain age 62.

 

(2)                                  Non-Grandfathered SERP Benefits .  The provisions of this Section 3.3(2) shall apply solely with respect to the portion of an Executive’s vested SERP Benefit that is a Non-Grandfathered SERP Benefit.  Payment of any portion of an Executive’s SERP Benefit that is a Grandfathered SERP Benefit shall be made in accordance with Section 3.3(1).

 

(a)                                  In General .  Except as provided in subsection (b), an Executive’s vested Non-Grandfathered SERP Benefit shall be paid or commence to be paid on the first day of the third month following the month in which occurs the later of the date on which the Executive (i) attains age 55 or (ii) Separates from Service, subject to Section 3.3(2)(d), and Section 3.4(2)(d) (as applicable).  The amount of any such SERP Benefit paid before the Executive’s attainment of age 65 shall be reduced by one/two hundred and eightieth (l/280th) for each month that the date of the commencement of the SERP Benefits precedes the date on which the Executive will attain age 62.

 

(b)                                  Cash Balance Participant .  A Cash Balance Participant’s Non-Grandfathered SERP Benefit shall be paid or commence to be paid on the first day of the third month following the month in which the Executive Separates from Service, subject to Section 3.3(2)(d) and Section 3.4(2)(d) (as applicable).

 

(c)                                   Certain Transition Distributions to Terminated Executives .

 

(i)                                      An Executive who Separated from Service after December 31, 2004 and before December 31, 2008 and has commenced payments of his Grandfathered SERP

 

7



 

Benefits at any time before December 31, 2008, shall receive his Non-Grandfathered SERP Benefit (if any), for which the Executive’s SERP Benefit is retroactively adjusted pursuant to Section 1.1 on January 1, 2009, in the same form and at the same time as the Executive’s Grandfathered benefit, subject to Section 3.3(2)(d).  Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Cash Balance Participant’s Non-Grandfathered SERP Benefit shall be paid on March 1, 2009, subject to Section 3.3(2)(d).

 

(ii)                                   An Executive who Separated from Service after December 31, 2004 and before December 31, 2008 and has not before December 31, 2008 commenced payments of his Non-Grandfathered SERP Benefit, shall receive his Non-Grandfathered SERP Benefit, for which the Executive’s SERP Benefit is retroactively adjusted pursuant to Section 1.2 on January 1, 2009, in a single lump sum on March 1, 2009.

 

(d)                                  Payment Delay for Specified Employees .  Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan, payments to a Specified Employee shall be made or commence on the first day of the month coincident with or immediately following the latest of (i) the date specified in Section 3.3(2)(a), (b) or (c), (ii) the date specified in Section 3.4(2)(d)(i), if the Executive made an election pursuant to such section, or (iii) the date that is six (6) months after the Specified Employee’s Separation From Service; provided, however, that if the Executive dies before the date specified in (i), (ii) or (iii), the Executive’s benefit shall be paid or commence on the date specified in Section 4.2.  The first payment made to the Specified Employee following the 6-month delay shall include any SERP Benefit payments that were not made as a result of the delay in payment pursuant to this paragraph (d), with interest at an annual rate of five percent (5%) compounded annually.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, this paragraph (d) shall not apply to any Executive if on the date of his Separation from Service, the stock of the Company and Controlled Group members is not publicly traded on an established securities market (within the meaning of the 409A Guidance).

 

(e)                                   Actuarial Adjustment for Delay on Account of Election Under Section 3.4(2)(d)(i) .  If an Executive’s election under Section 3.4(2)(d)(i) delays the commencement of benefits beyond the later of the Executive’s Separation from Service or the date on which the Executive attains age 62, then such benefit will be actuarially increased using the Actuarial Factors for lump sum calculations, as in effect on the date the benefit payments were originally scheduled to be paid or commenced to be paid, provided, however, in no event will the interest rate exceed seven and one-half percent (7½%).

 

Section 3.4                                     Form of Payment .

 

(1)                                  Grandfathered SERP Benefit .  The provisions of this Section 3.4(1) shall apply solely with respect to the portion of an Executive’s SERP Benefit that is a Grandfathered SERP Benefit.

 

(a)                                  In General .  An Executive who does not want his SERP Benefit to be paid in the form of the 15-year certain benefit described in Section 3.2 may elect to receive his SERP Benefit in any of the optional forms of benefit payment which are permitted under the Pension Plan.  Any such optional form of benefit shall be the Actuarial Equivalent of the SERP Benefit payable to the Executive in the form specified in Section 3.2.

 

(b)                                  Lump Sum Payment .

 

(i)                                      Notwithstanding the provisions of Subsection (l)(a) of this Section, an Executive may elect to receive the SERP Benefit in the form of a single lump sum payment.

 

8



 

(ii)           The lump sum payment described in paragraph (b)(i) of this Subsection shall be calculated by converting the Executive’s SERP Benefit (calculated in accordance with the provisions of Section 3.2) at the time of the commencement of such Benefit into a lump sum amount of equivalent actuarial value when computed using the Actuarial Factors specified in Exhibit A for this purpose, and then applying the ten percent (10%) reduction, if applicable, provided for in Subsection (c) of this Section.

 

(iii)          Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, in the event the equivalent actuarial value of the Executive’s SERP Benefit, when computed using the Actuarial Factors specified in Exhibit A for this purpose, does not exceed $25,000, such Benefit shall be paid in the form of a single lump sum payment.

 

(c)           Form/Timing of Election .  Any election of an optional form of benefit must be in writing (on a form provided by the Administrator) and filed with the Administrator prior to the Executive’s termination of employment with the Controlled Group because of involuntary termination, death or Disability or at least one (1) year prior to the Executive’s voluntary Retirement.  Any such election may be changed at any time and from time to time without the consent of any existing Death Beneficiary or any other person (except as described in Section 2.2), by filing a later signed written election with the Administrator; provided that any election made less than one (1) year prior to the Executive’s voluntary Retirement shall not be valid, and in such case, payment shall be made in accordance with the latest valid election of the Executive.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, an Executive shall be permitted to make an election to receive his SERP Benefit in the form of a lump sum payment within the one (1) year period prior to his voluntary termination if (and only if) the amount of the SERP Benefit payable to the Executive is reduced by ten percent (10%).

 

(2)           Non-Grandfathered SERP Benefits .  The provisions of this Section 3.4(2) shall apply solely with respect to the portion of an Executive’s SERP Benefit that is a Non-Grandfathered SERP Benefit.

 

(a)           Normal Payment Form .  Unless an Executive makes an election pursuant to Section 3.4(2)(b) or (e), the Executive’s Non-Grandfathered SERP Benefit will be paid to the Executive in the form of annual installment payments payable over a period often (10) years, the amount of which is Actuarially Equivalent to the SERP Benefit calculated under Section 3.2.

 

(b)           Optional Forms of Benefit .  In lieu of the normal form of payment, an Executive may make or change an election to receive his Non-Grandfathered SERP Benefit in one of the following Actuarially Equivalent optional forms of benefit:

 

(i)            A single life annuity payable monthly to the Executive during the Executive’s life and ending on the date of the Executive’s death.

 

(ii)           A reduced joint and survivor annuity payable monthly to the Executive during the Executive’s life, and after the Executive’s death, payable monthly to the Executive’s spouse who survives the Executive in the amount equal to 50%, 75% or 100% (as the Executive elects) of such reduced lifetime monthly amount.

 

(iii)          A reduced life and period certain annuity payable monthly to the Executive during the Executive’s life, with payment thereof guaranteed to be made for a period of five (5) or ten (10) years, as elected by the Executive, and, in the event of the Executive’s death before the end of such 5- or 10- year period, payable in the same

 

9



 

reduced amount for the remainder of such 5- or 10-year period, to the Death Beneficiary designated by the Executive.

 

(iv)          Annual installment payments payable to the Executive over a period of five (5) or ten (10) years, as elected by the Executive.

 

(v)           A single lump sum payment.

 

(c)           Mandatory Lump Sum .  Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, in the event that the present value of the Executive’s Non-Grandfathered SERP Benefit does not exceed $25,000 at the time of distribution, such Non-Grandfathered SERP Benefit shall be paid in the form of a single lump sum payment on the date of distribution determined under Section 3.3(2).

 

(d)           Election of Optional Form of Payment .  An election of an optional form of payment must be in writing (on a form provided by the Administrator) and must satisfy the following requirements:

 

(i)            Except as provided in Section 3.4(2)(e), if an Executive wishes to elect an optional form of payment under Section 3.4(2)(b) above (other than the normal form of payment) or wishes to change his election made under Section 3.4(2)(e) (other than an election change described in Section 3.4(2)(d)(ii)), the election will be considered made when it becomes irrevocable, which occurs when a properly completed form is received and accepted by the Administrator (but not later than fifteen (15) days following receipt), subject to the following:

 

(A)          the election may not take effect until at least twelve (12) months after the date on which the election is made;

 

(B)          the election must be made not less than twelve (12) months before the date the payment is scheduled to be paid; and

 

(C)          the payment (except in the case of death or Disability) pursuant to an election made under this Section 3.4(2)(d)(i) shall be made or commence on the first day of the month coincident with or immediately following the fifth anniversary of the date the payment was otherwise scheduled to be paid (or for annuity or installment payments treated as a single payment, the date the first amount was otherwise scheduled to be paid).

 

(ii)           An Executive who elected, pursuant to Section 3.4(2)(d)(i) or 3.4(2)(e), a life annuity form of payment (within the meaning of the 409A Guidance) described in Section 3.4(2)(b)(i), (ii) or (iii), may, at any time before the date of the first payment under the annuity, change that annuity form of payment to an Actuarially Equivalent life annuity form of payment, provided the commencement date for such annuity, as specified in, respectively, Section 3.4(2)(d)(i) or Section 3.4(2)(e), remains unchanged.

 

(e)           Transition Elections .  Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan, any Executive who is an active employee of the Company or a member of the Controlled Group during the election period designated by the Administrator, ending no later than December 31, 2008, may make an election to receive his Non-Grandfathered SERP Benefit in one of the optional forms specified in Section 3.4(2)(b), commencing on the date specified in Section 3.3(2)(a) or(b) (as

 

10



 

applicable); provided, however, that such election shall not apply if the Executive Separates from Service on or before December 31, 2008 and is subject to the provision of Section 3.3(2)(c).  The transition election must be made in writing, on a form provided by the Administrator and filed with the Administrator within the designated transition election period.  The transition election made pursuant to this paragraph (e) may not cause any amount to be paid in 2008 if not otherwise payable and may not delay payment of any amount that is otherwise payable in 2008.

 

(f)            Coordination of Payment Elections with Mirror Pension Plan .  If an Executive is also a participant in the Mirror Pension Plan, the Executive’s Non-Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefit and the Non-Grandfathered SERP Benefit will be paid in the same form and at the same time.  If an Executive makes an election of an optional payment form pursuant to Section 3.4(2)(b) of the Plan or Section 3.3(2)(b) of the Mirror Pension Plan, the most recent election made under either this Plan or the Mirror Pension Plan that has become effective will govern the form and time of payment under the Plan.  In the event of conflicting elections made simultaneously under this Plan and the Mirror Pension Plan, the election filed under this Plan shall govern.

 

Section 3.5            Death After Commencement of Non-Grandfathered SERP Benefits .  If an Executive dies after commencing payment of his Non-Grandfathered SERP Benefit under the Plan but before his entire Non-Grandfathered SERP Benefit is distributed, payments to the Executive’s Death Beneficiary (if any) will be made (a) in accordance with the elected optional form of payment described in Section 3.4(2)(b)(ii) or (iii) (if elected), or (b) ninety (90) days after the Executive’s death in the form of a single lump sum, calculated using the Actuarial Factors in effect on the date of distribution, if the Executive elected one of the optional forms of payment described in Section 3.4(b)(iv).

 

Section 3.6            Adjustment to Annual Installment Payments Commencing Prior to January 1, 2011 .  If payment of an Executive’s Non-Grandfathered SERP Benefit commenced after January 1, 2005 but prior to January 1, 2011 in the form of annual installment payments over a period of five (5) or ten (10) years, then

 

(1)           The Executive’s annual installment payments will be recalculated as of the original payment commencement date using the Plan’s Actuarial Factors for lump sum calculations and any increase in the amount of each such installment will be paid as follows:

 

(a)           The increase in the annual installments that were payable prior to January 1, 2011 will be paid in a single lump sum amount during the calendar quarter beginning January 1, 2011 and ending March 31, 2011; and

 

(b)           Each annual installment due on or after January 1, 2011 will be adjusted to include the increase resulting from the recalculation.

 

ARTICLE IV
SERP PRE-RETIREMENT BENEFITS

 

Section 4.1            Eligibility .  The Death Beneficiary of an Executive who dies after becoming vested in his SERP Benefits (including the Death Beneficiary of an Executive who dies while he is Disabled) but prior to commencing to receive SERP Benefits hereunder shall be entitled to receive the SERP Pre-Retirement Benefits described in Section 4.2 in lieu of any other benefits described in the Plan.

 

11



 

Section 4.2            Amount, Form and Timing of SERP Pre-Retirement Benefits .

 

(1)           Grandfathered SERP Benefit .  A Death Beneficiary who is eligible for a SERP Pre-Retirement Benefit hereunder shall receive the portion of such SERP Pre-Retirement Benefit that is based on the Executive’s Grandfathered SERP Benefit in accordance with this Subsection (1).  The SERP Pre-Retirement Benefit that is based on the Executive’s Grandfathered SERP Benefit shall be calculated in accordance with, and payable at the same time and (except as provided in Section 3.4(l)(b)) in the same manner as, the pre-retirement death benefits and (if applicable) the optional death benefits described in the Pension Plan, as determined by the Administrator.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Death Beneficiary of a Cash Balance Participant who is eligible for a SERP Pre-Retirement Benefit, shall receive such Benefit in the form of a lump sum payment.

 

(2)           Non-Grandfathered SERP Benefit .  A Death Beneficiary who is eligible for a SERP Pre-Retirement Benefit hereunder shall receive the portion of such SERP Pre-Retirement Benefit that is based on the Executive’s vested Non-Grandfathered SERP Benefit as follows.

 

(a)           If an Executive (i) is not married on the date of his death, (ii) has been married for less than one year prior to his death and designates a Death Beneficiary other than his spouse, or (iii) has been married for at least one year prior to his death and the Executive’s spouse consents to the Executive’s designation of a Death Beneficiary other than the spouse, the Executive’s Death Beneficiary shall receive his benefit in an amount Actuarially Equivalent to the survivor benefit determined as if the Executive had Separated from Service on the earlier of the date of his actual Separation from Service or the date of his death, elected to receive his Non-Grandfathered SERP Benefit in the form of a monthly life annuity with (A) a five (5) year certain survivor benefit if the Executive had Separated from Service before attaining age 55, or (B) a ten (10) year certain survivor benefit, if the Executive had attained age 55 while an Employee, had survived to age 55 and had died immediately following his payment commencement date.  The Non-Grandfathered SERP Pre-Retirement Benefit shall be paid in the form of an Actuarially Equivalent single lump sum payment on the first day of the third month after the later of the date on which the Executive would have attained age 55 or the date of the Executive’s death.

 

(b)           If an Executive who dies after becoming vested in his SERP Benefit is married on the date of his death and paragraph (a) does not apply to him, then the Executive’s surviving spouse shall receive the SERP Pre-Retirement Benefit as follows:

 

(i)            If the Executive had Separated from Service before attaining age 55, the Executive’s spouse shall receive a reduced annuity payable monthly to the Executive’s spouse during his life, commencing on the first day of the third month following the later of the date on which the Executive would have attained age 55 or the date of the Executive’s death and ending on the date of the Executive’s spouse’s death, calculated as if the Executive had Separated from Service on the earlier of the date of the Executive’s death or actual Separation from Service, elected a joint and 50% survivor annuity form of payment described in Section 3.4(2)(b)(ii), survived to age 55 and died on the date following the payment commencement date.

 

(ii)           If the Executive had attained age 55 while an Employee, the Executive’s spouse shall receive a reduced annuity payable monthly to the Executive’s spouse during his life, commencing on the first day of the of the third month after the date of the Executive’s death, calculated as if the Executive had died immediately after commencing payments in the form of an immediate joint and 100% survivor annuity form of payment described in Section 3.4(2)(b)(ii).

 

12



 

(c)           Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) if the SERP Pre-Retirement Benefit under this Subsection (2) is payable to a Cash-Balance Participant, such benefit will be distributed to the Executive’s Death Beneficiary in the form of an Actuarially Equivalent single lump sum 90 days after the Executive’s death, and (ii) if the present value of the SERP Pre-Retirement Benefit under this Subsection (2) payable to any Executive not described in (i) does not exceed $25,000, such benefit will be distributed to the Executive’s Death Beneficiary in the form of an Actuarially Equivalent single lump sum on the first day of the third month following the later of the date on which the Executive would have attained age 55 of the date of the Executive’s death.

 

ARTICLE V
VESTING

 

Section 5.1            Vesting .

 

(1)           In General .  Except as provided in Subsections (2) and (3) of this Section, an Executive shall become vested in the SERP Benefits upon (a) his attainment of age 65 while in the employ of the Controlled Group, (b) his attainment of age 55 while in the employ of the Controlled Group and his completion of 10 Years of Eligibility Service, or (c) his attainment of age 55 during the first twelve-month period of his Disability and his completion of 10 Years of Eligibility Service.

 

(2)           Forfeiture Provision .

 

(a)           Notwithstanding the provisions of Subsection (1) hereof, but subject to the requirements of paragraph (b) of this Subsection, the Employers shall be relieved of any obligation to pay or provide any future SERP Benefits or SERP Pre-Retirement Benefits under this Plan and shall be entitled to recover amounts already distributed if, without the written consent of the Company, the Executive, whether before or after termination with the Controlled Group (i) participates in dishonesty, fraud, misrepresentation, embezzlement or deliberate injury or attempted injury, in each case related to the Company or a Controlled Group member, (ii) commits any unlawful or criminal activity of a serious nature, (iii) commits any intentional and deliberate breach of a duty or duties that, individually or in the aggregate, are material in relation to the Executive’s overall duties or (iv) materially breaches any confidentiality or noncompete agreement entered into with the Company or a Controlled Group member.  The Employers shall have the burden of proving that one of the foregoing events has occurred.

 

(b)           Notwithstanding the foregoing, an Executive shall not forfeit any portion of his SERP Benefits or SERP Pre-Retirement Benefits under paragraph (a) of this Subsection unless (i) the Executive receives reasonable notice in writing setting forth the grounds for the forfeiture, (ii) if requested by the Executive, the Executive (and/or the Executive’s counsel or other representative) is granted a hearing before the full Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) and (iii) a majority of the members of the full Board determine that the Executive violated one or more of the provisions of paragraph (a) of this Subsection.

 

(3)           Acceleration of Vesting .  Notwithstanding the provisions of Subsection (1) hereof, the SERP Benefits of the Executives (a) who are employed by the Controlled Group on the date of a Change in Control or (b) whose employment with the Company was terminated prior to a Change in Control but the Executive reasonably demonstrates that the termination occurred at the request of a third party who has taken steps reasonably calculated to effect the Change in Control, shall become immediately one hundred percent (100%) vested upon the occurrence of such Change in Control.

 

13



 

(4)           Vesting Service After December 31, 2020 .  Notwithstanding Section 3.2(4) concerning the freeze of benefit accruals after December 31, 2020, an Executive is eligible to accrue Years of Eligibility Service and attain age 55 while in the employ of the Controlled Group for continued employment after December 31, 2020.

 

ARTICLE VI
MISCELLANEOUS

 

Section 6.1            Effect of Amendment and Termination .  Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan (including the Administrative Document) to the contrary, no amendment or termination of the Plan shall, without the consent of the Executive (or, in the case of his death, his Death Beneficiary), adversely affect the vested SERP Benefit or vested SERP Pre-Retirement Benefit under the Plan of any Executive or Death Beneficiary as such Benefit exists on the date of such amendment or termination; provided, however, that this limitation shall not apply to the extent deemed necessary by the Company to comply with the requirements of the 409A Guidance.

 

Section 6.2            Protective Provisions .  Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, if an Executive commits suicide during the two-year period beginning on the date of his commencement of participation in the Plan or makes any material misstatement or nondisclosure of medical history, then, in the Administrator’s sole and absolute discretion, no SERP Benefits or SERP Pre-Retirement Benefits shall be payable hereunder or such Benefits may be paid in a reduced amount (as determined by the Administrator).

 

Section 6.3            Limitation on Payments and Benefits .  Notwithstanding any provision of this Plan to the contrary, if any amount or benefit to be paid or provided under this Plan or any other plan or agreement between the Executive and a Controlled Group member would be an “Excess Parachute Payment,” within the meaning of Code Section 280G, or any successor provision thereto, but for the application of this sentence, then the payments and benefits to be paid or provided under this Plan shall be reduced to the minimum extent necessary (but in no event to less than zero) so that no portion of any such payment or benefit, as so reduced, constitutes an Excess Parachute Payment; provided, however, that the foregoing reduction shall be made only if and to the extent that such reduction would result in an increase in the aggregate payment and benefits to be provided to the Executive, determined on an after-tax basis (taking into account the excise tax imposed pursuant to Code Section 4999, or any successor provision thereto, any tax imposed by any comparable provision of state law, and any applicable federal, state and local income taxes).  If requested by the Executive or the Company, the determination of whether any reduction in such payments or benefits to be provided under this Plan or otherwise is required pursuant to the preceding sentence shall be made by the Company’s independent accountants, at the expense of the Company, and the determination of the Company’s independent accountants shall be final and binding on all persons.  The fact that the Executive’s right to payments or benefits may be reduced by reason of the limitations contained in this Section 6.3 shall not of itself limit or otherwise affect any other rights of the Executive pursuant to this Plan.  The Executive’s benefit will be reduced only to the extent that the reduction in any cash payments due to the Executive is insufficient to reduce or eliminate Excess Parachute Payment as described in this Section.  The Executive’s Non-Grandfathered SERP Benefit (if any) shall be reduced if required by this section before any Grandfathered SERP Benefit is reduced.

 

Section 6.4            Establishment of Trust Fund .

 

(1)           In General .  The Plan is intended to be an unfunded, non-qualified retirement plan.  However, the Company may enter into a trust agreement with a trustee to establish a trust fund (the “Trust Fund”) and to transfer assets thereto (or cause assets to be transferred thereto), subject to the claims of the creditors of the Employers, pursuant to which some or all of the SERP Benefits and SERP

 

14



 

Pre-Retirement Benefits shall be paid.  Payments from the Trust Fund shall discharge the Employers’ obligation to make payments under the Plan to the extent that Trust Fund assets are used to satisfy such obligations.

 

(2)           Upon a Change in Control .

 

(a)           Within thirty (30) business days of the occurrence of a Change in Control, to the extent it has not already done so, the Company shall be required to establish an irrevocable Trust Fund for the purpose of paying SERP Benefits and SERP Pre-Retirement Benefits.  Except as described in the following sentence, all contributions to the Trust Fund shall be irrevocable and the Company shall not have the right to direct the trustee to return to the Employers, or divert to others, any of the assets of the Trust Fund until after satisfaction of all liabilities to all of the Executives and their Death Beneficiaries under the Plan.  Any assets deposited in the Trust Fund shall be subject to the claims of the creditors of the Employers and any excess assets remaining in the Trust Fund after satisfaction of all liabilities shall revert to the Company.

 

(b)           In addition to the requirements described in paragraph (a) above, the Trust Fund which becomes effective on the Change in Control shall be subject to the following additional requirements:

 

(i)            the trustee of the Trust Fund shall be a third party corporate or institutional trustee;

 

(ii)           the Trust Fund shall satisfy the requirements of a grantor trust under the Code; and

 

(iii)          the Trust Fund shall automatically terminate (A) in the event that it is determined by a final decision of the United States Department of Labor (or, if an appeal is taken therefrom, by a court of competent jurisdiction) that by reason of the creation of, and a transfer of assets to, the Trust, the Trust is considered “funded” for purposes of Title I of ERISA or (B) in the event that it is determined by a final decision of the Internal Revenue Service (or, if an appeal is taken therefrom, by a court of competent jurisdiction) that (I) a transfer of assets to the Trust is considered a transfer of property for purposes of Code Section 83 or any successor provision thereto, or (II) pursuant to Code Section 451 or 409A or any successor provision thereto, amounts are includable as compensation in the gross income of a Trust Fund beneficiary in a taxable year that is prior to the taxable year or years in which such amounts would otherwise be actually distributed or made available to such beneficiary by the trustee.  Upon such a termination of the Trust, all of the assets in the Trust Fund attributable to the accrued SERP Benefits and SERP Pre-Retirement Benefits shall be immediately distributed to the Executives and the remaining assets, if any, shall revert to the Company; provided, however, that distributions to the Executives will be made only to the extent and in the manner permitted by the 409A Guidance.

 

(c)           Within five (5) days following establishment of the Trust Fund, the Company shall transfer (or cause the Employers to transfer) to the trustee of such Trust Fund an amount equal to the equivalent actuarial present value of the SERP Benefits and SERP Pre-Retirement Benefits which have been accrued as of the date of the Change in Control on behalf of all of the Executives under the Plan (using the Actuarial Factors specified in Exhibit A for this purpose).

 

15



 

(d)           In January of each year following a funding of the Trust Fund pursuant to paragraph (c) above, the Company shall cause to be deposited in the Trust Fund such additional amount (if any) by which the aggregate equivalent actuarial present value (determined using the Actuarial Factors specified in Exhibit A) of the sum of the SERP Benefits and SERP Pre-Retirement Benefits for all Executives under the Plan as of December 31 of the preceding year exceeds the fair market value of the assets of the Trust Fund as of such date.

 

(e)           Notwithstanding the foregoing, an Employer shall not be required to make any contributions to the Trust Fund if the Employer is insolvent at the time such contribution is required.

 

(f)            The Administrator shall notify the trustee of the amount of SERP Pension Benefits and SERP Pre-Retirement Benefits to be paid to or on behalf of the Executive from the Trust Fund and shall assist the trustee in making distribution thereof in accordance with the terms of the Plan.

 

(g)           Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan or the Administrative Document to the contrary, the provisions of this Section 6.4(2) hereof (i) may not be amended following a Change in Control and (ii) prior to a Change in Control may only be amended (A) with the written consent of each of the Executives or (B) if the effective date of such Amendment is at least two (2) years following the date the Executives were given written notice of the adoption of such amendment; provided, however, that this limitation shall not apply to any amendment that is deemed necessary or reasonable (as determined in the sole discretion of the Committee) to comply with the requirements of the 409A Guidance.

 

Section 6.5            Delay of Payments Subject to Code Section 162(m) .  The Company may delay the distribution of any amount otherwise required to be distributed under the Plan if, and to the extent that, the Company reasonably anticipates that the Company’s deduction with respect to such distribution otherwise would be limited or eliminated by application of Code Section 162(m).  In such event, (1) if any payment is delayed during any year on account of Code Section 162(m), then all payments that could be delayed on account of Code Section 162(m) during such year must also be delayed; (2) such delayed payments must be paid either (i) in the first year in which the Company reasonably anticipates the payment to be deductible, or (ii) the period beginning on the date of the Executive’s Separation from Service and ending on the later of the end of the Executive’s year of separation or the fifteenth (15th) day of the third month after such separation; and (3) if payment is delayed to the date of Separation from Service with respect to an Executive who is a Specified Employee, such payment shall commence after such Executive’s Separation from Service on the date immediately following the six-month anniversary of the Separation from Service, or if earlier, on the date of the Executive’s death.

 

16



 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Ecolab Inc. has executed this Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and has caused its corporate seal to be affixed this 23 rd  day of December, 2013.

 

 

ECOLAB INC.

 

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/Daniel J. Schmechel

 

 

Daniel J. Schmechel

 

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

(Seal)

 

 

 

 

 

Attest:

 

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/James J. Seifert

 

 

 

 

James J. Seifert

 

 

 

Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

 

 

 

17



 

EXHIBIT A

ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS

FOR SERP BENEFITS AND

SERP PRE-RETIREMENT BENEFITS

 

1.

Interest Rate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A.    For Lump Sum

 

The interest rate will be 125% of the 10-year Treasury rate for the month of October preceding the Plan Year (i.e., January 1) (1) in which the retirement or other termination of employment is effective if the SERP Benefit is to commence immediately following such retirement or termination of employment or (2) in which the distribution becomes payable if the payment is to be deferred.

 

 

 

 

 

B.    Annual Installments

 

Same as for lump sum.

 

 

 

 

 

C.    General Actuarial Equivalence

 

7.5% except as provided in item 4 below.

 

 

 

 

2.

Mortality – General Actuarial Equivalence

 

1971 Group Annuity Table.

 

 

 

 

3.

Annuity Values Weighted - General Actuarial Equivalence

 

75% male, 25% female.

 

 

 

 

4.

Early Commencement:

 

If payment is in the form of a single lump sum, the lump sum amount shall be based on the lump sum interest rate defined in item 1 above, and the “early retirement benefit” immediate annuity amount as determined under Section 3.3(l)(b) or 3.3(2)(a).

 

Exhibit A-1



 

EXHIBIT B
PRIMARY SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS

 

(A)          For purposes of the Plan, an Executive’s monthly primary social security benefit is the estimated social security benefit amount, under the Old Age and Survivors Insurance Benefit Act of the United States in effect on the first day of the calendar year during which the Executive terminates employment, which the Executive is receiving, or would be entitled to receive, commencing at his attainment of age 65, whether or not he applies for, or actually receives, such benefits.

 

(B)          The amounts determined under section (A) hereof shall be based upon the following assumptions:

 

(1)           except as otherwise provided in Subsection (5) hereof, the Executive is assumed to have participated in social security starting at the later of age 22 or January 1, 1951;

 

(2)           except as otherwise provided in Subsection (5) hereof, the Executive’s compensation on which his social security benefit is based shall be assumed to be that resulting from applying a decrease for years prior to the mid-year of the years on which the Executive’s Final Average Compensation is based, and an increase for years following such mid-year, at the same rates as the national average total wages for adjusting earnings as used in computing social security benefits, as published by the Social Security Administration for each such year, with the rate for the last published year being used for any years subsequent to such last published year;

 

(3)           except as otherwise provided in Subsection (5) hereof, the taxable wage base, the factors for indexing wages, and the table or formula used to determine the estimated monthly primary social security benefit amount will be assumed to remain constant following the Executive’s termination of employment;

 

(4)           except as otherwise provided in Subsection (5) hereof, for an Executive whose employment terminates prior to his attainment of age 65, it shall be assumed that he earned no compensation from the date of termination of his employment to his attainment of age 65;

 

(5)           for an Executive whose benefit is based, in whole or part, upon the continuing accrual of Years of Benefit Service during the period of his Disability, it shall be assumed that, during the period for which he accrues Years of Benefit Service under those sections, he continued to earn Annual Compensation at the same rate as during the Plan Year in which he became Disabled; provided, however, that, in the event the Executive is receiving, or is entitled to receive, a primary social security disability benefit, the amount of such benefit shall be deemed to be his “primary social security benefit” for purposes of the Plan, in lieu of the amount otherwise determined under this Exhibit B;

 

Exhibit B-1



 

(C)          an Executive who, for any reason, is not a participant in the United States social security benefit program shall be deemed to participate fully in such program for purposes of determining the Executive’s primary social security benefit.

 

(D)          An Executive’s primary social security benefit may be determined by reference to a schedule based upon pay brackets, provided such schedule is prepared in accordance with the foregoing provisions of this Exhibit B.

 

Exhibit B-2



 

EXHIBIT C
SAVINGS PLAN BENEFIT

 

The Savings Plan Benefit shall be one-twelfth (l/12th) of the annual benefit, determined by the Administrator, that would be provided by Employer Contributions to the Ecolab Savings Plan (formerly the EL Thrift Plan) (hereafter the “Savings Plan”) made on or prior to July 1, 1994, if the Executive’s benefit under the Savings Plan as of July 3, 1994 were paid commencing at the Executive’s attainment of age 65 on a straight life annuity basis (based on an interest rate of 4.25% and the 1984 Unisex Pension Mortality Table shifted forward one year) and assuming (1) that the Employers contributed to the Savings Plan on the Executive’s behalf from (a) the later of January 1, 1977 or the date of the Executive’s first eligibility for participation in the Savings Plan until (b) the earlier of the Executive’s Retirement or July 1, 1994, an annual amount equal to three percent (3%) of the Executive’s actual Annual Compensation; provided, however, that the three percent (3%) shall be reduced by the amount, if any, which could not be contributed in each year by reason of the maximum contributions limitations of Code Section 415 and the maximum compensation limitations of Code Section 401(a)(17), and (2) that such Employer contributions to the Savings Plan on behalf of the Executive accumulated earnings at an annual rate of eight percent (8%) for all periods prior to January 1, 1991, and for each calendar year thereafter until the earlier of the Executive’s attainment of age 65 or December 31, 1993, at an interest rate established annually by the Administrator based on the PBGC’s immediate annuity rate as of the December 31 of the immediately preceding year, and for the period from January 1, 1994 until the attainment of age 65, at an interest rate of 4.25% (the December 1993 PBGC immediate rate).

 

Exhibit C-1



 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

Page

 

 

 

ARTICLE I PREFACE

2

Section 1.1

Effective Date

2

Section 1.2

Purpose of the Plan

2

Section 1.3

Administrative Document

2

Section 1.4

American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (AJCA)

2

 

 

 

ARTICLE II DEFINITIONS

3

Section 2.1

“Actuarial Equivalent” or “Actuarially Equivalent.”

3

Section 2.2

“Actuarial Factors”

3

Section 2.3

“Cash Balance Participant”

3

Section 2.4

“Death Beneficiary.”

3

Section 2.5

“Disability” or “Disabled”

3

Section 2.6

“Executive”

3

Section 2.7

“Final Average Compensation”

3

Section 2.8

“Grandfathered SERP Benefit”

4

Section 2.9

“Mirror Pension Benefit”

4

Section 2.10

“Non-Grandfathered SERP Benefit”

4

Section 2.11

“Pension Benefit”

4

Section 2.12

“Plan”

4

Section 2.13

“Primary Insurance Amount”

4

Section 2.14

“Retirement” or “Retired.”

4

Section 2.15

“Savings Plan Benefit”

4

Section 2.16

“Separation from Service” or to “Separate from Service”

5

Section 2.17

“SERP Benefit”

5

Section 2.18

“SERP Pre-Retirement Benefit”

5

Section 2.19

“Specified Employee”

5

Section 2.20

“Year of Benefit Service.”

5

Section 2.21

“Year of Eligibility Service.”

5

Section 2.22

“Year of Past Service Credit”

5

 

 

 

ARTICLE III SERP BENEFITS

6

Section 3.1

Participation

6

Section 3.2

Amount of SERP Benefits

6

 

i



 

Section 3.3

Time of Payment

7

Section 3.4

Form of Payment

8

Section 3.5

Death After Commencement of Non-Grandfathered SERP Benefits

11

Section 3.6

Adjustment to Annual Installment Payments Commencing Prior to January 1, 2011

11

 

 

ARTICLE IV SERP PRE-RETIREMENT BENEFITS

11

Section 4.1

Eligibility

11

Section 4.2

Amount, Form and Timing of SERP Pre-Retirement Benefits

12

 

 

 

ARTICLE V VESTING

13

Section 5.1

Vesting

13

 

 

 

ARTICLE VI MISCELLANEOUS

14

Section 6.1

Effect of Amendment and Termination

14

Section 6.2

Protective Provisions

14

Section 6.3

Limitation on Payments and Benefits

14

Section 6.4

Establishment of Trust Fund

14

Section 6.5

Delay of Payments Subject to Code Section 162(m)

16

 

ii


Exhibit (10.12)

 

ECOLAB MIRROR SAVINGS PLAN

 

(As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2014)

 



 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

Page

 

 

ARTICLE I PREFACE

2

SECTION 1.1 Effective Date

2

SECTION 1.2 Purpose of the Plan

2

SECTION 1.3 Administrative Document

2

SECTION 1.4 American Jobs Creation Act (AJCA)

2

SECTION 1.5 Excess Plan

3

 

 

ARTICLE II DEFINITIONS

3

SECTION 2.1 “Account”

3

SECTION 2.2 “Base Salary”

3

SECTION 2.3 “Bonus

4

SECTION 2.4 “Death Beneficiary.”

4

SECTION 2.5 “Disability” or “Disabled.”

4

SECTION 2.6 “Executive”

4

SECTION 2.7 “Executive Deferrals”

4

SECTION 2.8 “Hypothetical Investment Fund”

4

SECTION 2.9 “Insolvent

4

SECTION 2.10 “Matching Contributions”

5

SECTION 2.11 “Minimum Benefit”

5

SECTION 2.12 “Mirror Savings Benefit.”

5

SECTION 2.13 “Nalco PSSP”

5

SECTION 2.14 “Plan”

5

SECTION 2.15 “Savings Plan”

5

SECTION 2.16 “Separation from Service” or to “Separate from Service”

5

SECTION 2.17 “Specified Employee”

5

SECTION 2.18 “Traditional Savings Plan

5

SECTION 2.19 “Unforeseeable Emergency.”

5

 

 

ARTICLE III MIRROR SAVINGS BENEFIT

6

SECTION 3.1 Amount of Executive Deferrals

6

SECTION 3.2 Effect and Duration of Direction Pursuant to Section 3.1

7

SECTION 3.3 Matching Contributions

7

SECTION 3.4 Executives’ Accounts

8

SECTION 3.5 Statement of Account

9

 

i



 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(continued)

 

 

Page

 

 

ARTICLE IV PAYMENT OF MIRROR SAVINGS BENEFITS

9

SECTION 4.1 Time of Payment

9

SECTION 4.2 Form of Payment

10

 

 

ARTICLE V VESTING

13

SECTION 5.1 Vesting

13

 

 

ARTICLE VI INVESTMENT OF ACCOUNTS

14

SECTION 6.1 Hypothetical Investment Funds

14

 

 

ARTICLE VII MISCELLANEOUS

15

SECTION 7.1 Effect of Amendment and Termination

15

SECTION 7.2 Limitation on Payments and Benefits

15

SECTION 7.3 Establishment of a Trust Fund

15

SECTION 7.4 Delay of Payments Subject to Code Section 162(m)

17

 

ii



 

ECOLAB MIRROR SAVINGS PLAN

 

(As Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2014)

 

WHEREAS, Ecolab Inc. (the “Company”)  previously established the Ecolab Mirror Savings Plan (the “Plan”) to provide additional deferred compensation benefits for certain management and highly compensated employees who perform management and professional functions for the Company and certain related entities; and

 

WHEREAS, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, P.L. 108-357 (the “AJCA”) added a new Section 409A to the Code, which significantly changed the Federal tax law applicable to “amounts deferred” under the Plan after December 31, 2004; and

 

WHEREAS, the IRS and U.S. Treasury subsequently issued regulations and other guidance regarding the requirements of and compliance with Code Section 409A; and

 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company directed and authorized appropriate officers of the Company to amend the Plan to comply, with respect to the Executives’ Post-2004 Sub-Accounts, with the requirements of Code Section 409A and guidance issued thereunder; and

 

WHEREAS, the Company desires to bifurcate the Plan into an “excess plan” (referred to in the Plan as “Primary Deferrals”) and a deferred savings plan (referred to in the Plan as “Secondary Deferrals”), with the former constituting an “excess plan” for purposes of Minnesota state income tax; and

 

WHEREAS, on December 19, 2008 the Plan was amended and restated in its entirety, effective as of January 1, 2005; and

 

WHEREAS, on December 21, 2011 the Plan was amended and restated in its entirety, effective as of January 1, 2012 to clarify ambiguous language in the Plan document; and

 

WHEREAS, the Company amended the Plan effective as of January 1, 2013 to modify the determination of matching credits under the Plan to conform with the formulas under the qualified plans and extend certain references to the Ecolab Savings Plan and ESOP to include references to the Ecolab Savings Plan and ESOP for Traditional Benefit Employees and the Nalco Company Profit Sharing and Savings Plan;

 

WHEREAS, the Company wishes to amend the Plan effective as of January 1, 2014 to clarify the date subsequent distribution elections become irrevocable under the Plan, to modify the determination of matching credits for employees of new affiliates who have adopted the Plan, and to allow participants, for the 2014 Plan Year only, to defer a specified percentage, not to exceed 25%, of Base Salary, or, for the 2014 Plan Year and subsequent Plan Years, to defer amounts of Base Salary that are in excess of the compensation limitation described in Code Section 401(a)(17) for the Plan Year at the percentage (either 5% or 8%) necessary to receive the maximum Matching Contribution under this Plan for the Plan Year.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Section 5.1 of the Ecolab Inc. Administrative Document for Non-Qualified Benefit Plans, the Company hereby amends and restates the Plan in its entirety to read as follows:

 

1



 

ARTICLE I
PREFACE

 

SECTION 1.1  Effective Date .  The effective date of this amendment and restatement of the Plan is January 1, 2014, except as otherwise provided in this amendment and restatement.  The benefit, if any, payable with respect to a former Executive who terminated employment prior to the Effective Date (and who is not rehired by a member of the Controlled Group thereafter) shall be determined by, and paid in accordance with, the terms and provisions of the Plan as in effect prior to the Effective Date, subject to Section 1.4.

 

SECTION 1.2  Purpose of the Plan .  The purpose of this Plan is to provide additional deferred compensation benefits for certain management and highly compensated employees who perform management and professional functions for the Company and certain related entities.

 

SECTION 1.3  Administrative Document .  This Plan includes the Ecolab Inc. Administrative Document for Non-Qualified Benefit Plans (the “Administrative Document”), which is incorporated herein by reference.

 

SECTION 1.4  American Jobs Creation Act (AJCA) .

 

(1)                                  It is intended that the Plan (including all Amendments thereto) comply with the provisions of Section 409A of the Code, as enacted by the AJCA, to prevent the inclusion in gross income of any amount credited to an Executive’s Account hereunder in a taxable year that is prior to the taxable year or years in which such amounts would otherwise be actually distributed or made available to the Executive.  It is intended that the Plan shall be administered in a manner that will comply with Section 409A of the Code, including proposed, temporary or final regulations or any other guidance issued by the Secretary of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service with respect thereto (collectively with the AJCA, the “409A Guidance”).  All Plan provisions shall be interpreted in a manner consistent with the 409A Guidance.

 

(2)                                  The Administrator shall not take any action hereunder that would violate any provision of the 409A Guidance.  It is intended that all Executives’ elections hereunder will comply with the 409A Guidance.  The Administrator is authorized to adopt rules or regulations deemed necessary or appropriate in connection therewith to anticipate and/or comply with the requirements thereof (including any transition or grandfather rules thereunder).  In this regard, the Administrator is authorized to permit Executive elections with respect to amounts deferred after December 31, 2004 and is also permitted to give the Executives the right to amend or revoke such elections in accordance with the 409A Guidance.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, neither the Company nor the Administrator guarantee any tax consequences of any Participant’s participation in, deferrals or contributions under, or payments from, the Plan, and each Participant shall be solely responsible for payment of any tax obligations of such Participant incurred in connection with participation in the Plan.

 

(3)                                  In furtherance of, but without limiting the foregoing, any Executive Deferrals and Matching Contributions (and the earnings thereon) that are deemed to have been deferred prior to January 1, 2005 and that qualify for “grandfathered status” under Section

 

2



 

409A of the Code shall continue to be governed by the law applicable to nonqualified deferred compensation prior to the addition of Section 409A to the Code and shall be subject to the terms and conditions specified in the Plan as in effect prior to January 1, 2005.  In particular, to the extent permitted under the 409A Guidance, the Bonus Deferrals relating to a Bonus that is earned during 2004, but paid in 2005, shall be allocated to the Executive’s Pre-2005 Sub-Account hereunder.

 

SECTION 1.5  Excess Plan .  Effective January 1, 2009, (a) all Account balances under the Plan that are attributable to Executive and Company contributions to the Plan made with respect to Plan Years beginning on and after January 1, 2009 (as adjusted for earnings, losses, expenses and distributions) that were not permitted under the Savings Plan, Traditional Savings Plan, or Nalco PSSP due to contribution limitations imposed on “qualified plans” by the Internal Revenue Code, specifically including Code Sections 401(a)(17), 401(k), 401(m), 402(g) and 415, shall be accounted for separately and shall be, for purposes of any applicable federal and state tax law, an “excess plan” (the “Primary Deferrals”); and (b) all Account balances other than the Primary Deferrals Account balances shall be accounted for separately and shall be a deferred savings plan (the “Secondary Deferrals”).

 

ARTICLE II
DEFINITIONS

 

Words and phrases when used herein with initial capital letters which are defined in the Savings Plan or the Administrative Document are used herein as so defined, unless otherwise specifically defined herein or the context clearly indicates otherwise.  The following words and phrases when used in this Plan with initial capital letters shall have the following respective meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:

 

SECTION 2.1  “ Account ” shall mean the record maintained in accordance with Section 3.4 by the Company for each Executive’s Mirror Savings Benefit .  The Executive’s Account shall be further divided into the following two Sub-Accounts:  (a) the “Pre-2005 Sub-Account” for amounts that are “deferred” (as such term is defined in the 409A Guidance) as of December 31, 2004 ( and earnings thereon), which includes the Minimum Benefit, and (b) the “Post-2004 Sub-Account” for amounts that are deferred after December 31, 2004 (and earnings thereon).  Effective as of January 1, 2009, each Executive’s Pre-2005 Sub-Account shall be part of the Secondary Deferrals.  Effective as of January 1, 2009, the Administrator shall establish, under the Executive’s Post-2004 Sub-Account, (i) the Primary Deferrals Sub-Account consisting of (A) the Executive’s Deferrals with respect to Base Salary and Bonus earned in Plan Years beginning on and after January 1, 2009 (and earnings thereon) that the Executive was precluded from deferring under the Savings Plan, Traditional Savings Plan or Nalco PSSP due to contribution limitations imposed on “qualified plans” by the Code, and (B) Matching Contributions made on the Executive’s behalf with respect to Plan Years beginning on or after January 1, 2009 (and earnings thereon), and (ii) the Secondary Deferrals Sub-Account consisting of the Executive’s Post-2004 Sub-Account balances other than the Primary Deferrals Sub-Account balances.

 

SECTION 2.2  “ Base Salary ” shall mean an Executive’s base salary for the Plan Year (including, for this purpose, any salary reductions caused as a result of participation (1) in an Employer-sponsored plan which is governed by Sections 401(k), 132(f)(4) or 125 of the Code or (2) in this Plan) .

 

3



 

SECTION 2.3  “ Bonus .”  An Executive’s Bonus for a Plan Year is equal to the sum of (1) the annual cash incentive bonus under the Company’s Management Incentive Plan and/or, if applicable, the Company’s Management Performance Incentive Plan, and (2) any similar annual cash incentive bonus under any other equivalent Employer-sponsored bonus program (as determined by the Administrator), which, in either case, is earned with respect to services performed by the Executive during such Plan Year, whether or not such Bonus is actually paid to the Executive during such Plan Year .  An election to defer a Bonus under this Plan must be made before the period in which the service is performed which gives rise to such Bonus.

 

SECTION 2.4  “ Death Beneficiary .”

 

(1)                                  The term “Death Beneficiary” shall mean the person or persons designated by the Executive to receive Mirror Savings Benefits hereunder in the event of his death.  The designation of a Death Beneficiary under the Plan may be made, and may be revoked or changed only by an instrument (in form prescribed by Administrator) signed by the Executive and delivered to the Administrator during the Executive’s lifetime.  If the Executive is married on the date of his death and has been married to such spouse throughout the one-year period ending on the date of death, his designation of a Death Beneficiary other than, or in addition to, his spouse under the Plan shall not be effective unless such spouse has consented in writing to such designation.

 

(2)                                  Any Mirror Savings Benefits remaining to be paid after the death of a Death Beneficiary shall be paid to the Death Beneficiary’s estate, except as otherwise provided in the Executive’s Death Beneficiary designation.

 

SECTION 2.5  “ Disability ” or “ Disabled .”  With respect to an Executive’s Pre-2005 Sub-Account, an Executive shall be deemed to have a “Disability” or be “Disabled” if the Executive’s employment with an Employer terminates due to a disability that entitles the Executive to benefits under (1) any long-term disability plan sponsored by the Company, or (2) in the event that the Executive is not a participant in any such plan, the Social Security Act of the United States .

 

SECTION 2.6  “ Executive ” shall mean an Employee (1) whose annualized Annual Compensation (excluding severance pay) and target bonus for any Plan Year exceeds the limitation described in Code Section 401(a)(17), and (2) who is selected by the Administrator to participate in the Plan .  Once an Employee has satisfied the requirements of an Executive and commenced participation in the Plan, his participation may continue, notwithstanding the fact that his Annual Compensation is reduced below the limitation described in Code Section 401(a)(17), until the Administrator determines, in his or her sole discretion, that the Employee would fail to satisfy the requirements of a “management or highly compensated employee” under ERISA.

 

SECTION 2.7  “ Executive Deferrals ” shall mean the amounts described in Section 3.1 .

 

SECTION 2.8  “ Hypothetical Investment Fund ” shall mean the investment funds designated by the Company pursuant to Section 6.1 .

 

SECTION 2.9  “ Insolvent .” For purposes of this Plan, an Employer shall be considered Insolvent at such time as it (1) is unable to pay its debts as they mature, or (2) is subject to a pending voluntary or involuntary proceeding as a debtor under the United States Bankruptcy Code .

 

4



 

SECTION 2.10  “ Matching Contributions ” shall mean the amounts described in Section 3.3 .

 

SECTION 2.11  “ Minimum Benefit ” shall mean the sum of the portions of the Executive’s Account attributable to amounts credited under a prior plan (the “Prior Plan”), including (1) his or her Account balance as of September 1, 1994, and (2) any deferral of his Bonus payable with respect to calendar 1994 and the Matching Contribution thereon .

 

SECTION 2.12  “ Mirror Savings Benefit .” An Executive’s Mirror Savings Benefit at any particular time shall be equal to the vested amounts credited to his Account at such time, as determined under Articles III and V .

 

SECTION 2.13  “ Nalco PSSP shall mean the Nalco Company Profit Sharing and Savings Plan, as such plan may be amended from time-to-time. The Nalco PSSP was merged with and into the Savings Plan effective August 2, 2013 .

 

SECTION 2.14  “ Plan ” shall mean the Ecolab Mirror Savings Plan, as described herein and as it may be amended from time to time .

 

SECTION 2.15  “ Savings Plan ” shall mean the Ecolab Savings Plan and ESOP, as such plan may be amended from time to time, and includes the Nalco PSSP following its merger with and into the Savings Plan on August 2, 2013 .

 

SECTION 2.16  “ Separation from Service ” or to “ Separate from Service ” shall mean any termination of employment with the Controlled Group due to retirement, death, disability or other reason; provided, however, that no Separation from Service is deemed to occur while the Executive (1) is on military leave, sick leave, or other bona fide leave of absence that does not exceed six (6) months (or, in the case of disability, twelve (12) months), or if longer, the period during which the Executive’s right to reemployment with the Controlled Group is provided either by statute or by contract, or (2) continues to perform services for the Controlled Group at an annual rate of fifty percent (50%) or more of the average level of services performed over the immediately preceding 36-month period (or the full period in which the Executive provided services (whether as an employee or as an independent contractor) if the Executive has been providing services for less than 36 months) .  For purposes of this Section, “disability” shall mean any medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than six months, where such impairment causes the Executive to be unable to perform the duties of his or her position of employment or any substantially similar position of employment.  Whether an Executive has incurred a Separation from Service shall be determined in accordance with the 409A Guidance.

 

SECTION 2.17  “ Specified Employee ” shall mean “Specified Employee” as defined in the Administrative Document .

 

SECTION 2.18  “ Traditional Savings Plan ” means the Ecolab Savings and ESOP for Traditional Benefit Employees, as such Plan may be amended from time to time .

 

SECTION 2.19  “ Unforeseeable Emergency .” With respect to an Executive’s Post-2004 Sub-Account, “Unforeseeable Emergency” shall mean an event which results in a severe financial hardship to the Executive as a consequence of (1) an illness or accident of the Executive, the

 

5



 

Executive’s spouse, Death Beneficiary or a dependent (as defined in Section 152(a) of the Code, without regard to Section 152(b)(1), (b)(2), and (d)(1)(B)), (2) loss of the Executive’s property due to casualty (including the need to rebuild a home following damage to a home not otherwise covered by insurance, for example, not as a result of a natural disaster) or (3) other similar extraordinary and unforeseeable circumstances arising as a result of events beyond the control of the Executive .  With respect to an Executive’s Pre-2005 Sub-Account, “Unforeseeable Emergency” shall mean an event which results (or will result) in severe financial hardship to the Executive as a consequence of an unexpected illness or accident or loss of the Executive’s property due to casualty or other similar extraordinary or unforeseen circumstances out of the control of the Executive, determined in accordance with Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-2(i)(3).

 

ARTICLE III
MIRROR SAVINGS BENEFIT

 

SECTION 3.1  Amount of Executive Deferrals .  Each Executive may, within 30 days after the Plan becomes effective as to him and, thereafter, prior to the first day of any subsequent Plan Year, by written notice to the Administrator on a form provided by the Administrator, direct his Employer:

 

(1)                                  to reduce (in accordance with rules established by the Administrator) the Executive’s Base Salary for the balance of the Plan Year in which the Plan becomes effective as to him (but only with respect to Base Salary payable for periods of service commencing after the Executive so directs) or for any following Plan Year (a) for the Plan Year ending December 31, 2014 only, by a specified percentage (limited to a maximum Salary Deferral of 25% of the Executive’s Base Salary in the deferral period) or (b) by a specified percentage of the portion of the Executive’s Base Salary in excess of the limitation described in Code section 401(a)(17) for the Plan Year, which percentage is (i) five percent (5%) for an Executive who at the time of the election is participating in the Traditional Savings Plan, or (ii) eight percent (8%) for an Executive who at the time of the election is participating in the Savings Plan (the “Salary Deferrals”), and

 

(2)                                  to reduce (in accordance with rules established by the Administrator) the Executive’s Bonus which is earned with respect to services performed by the Executive for the balance of the Plan Year in which the Plan becomes effective as to him (but only with respect to Bonus payable for period of service commencing after the Executive’s direction becomes irrevocable) or for any following Plan Year by a specified percentage of the portion of the Executive’s Bonus earned during the deferral period, which percentage does not cause the deferral to exceed one hundred percent (100%) of the net amount of the Bonus after payment of applicable FICA and related federal and state income tax withholdings (the “Bonus Deferrals”), and

 

(3)                                  to credit the amounts described in Subsections (1) and (2) of this Section (collectively, the “Executive Deferrals”) to the Account described in Section 3.4 at the times described therein.

 

6



 

SECTION 3.2  Effect and Duration of Direction Pursuant to Section 3.1 .

 

(1)                                  Plan Year to Plan Year .  Any direction by an Executive to make Executive Deferrals under Section 3.1 shall be effective with respect to the Base Salary and Bonus otherwise earned by the Executive with respect to the period to which the direction relates, and the Executive shall not be eligible to receive such Executive Deferrals.  Instead, such Executive Deferrals shall be credited to the Executive’s Account as provided in Section 3.4.  Any direction made in accordance with Section 3.1 shall remain in effect until changed or revoked, except that such direction shall become irrevocable on the last day of the Plan Year immediately preceding the Plan Year with respect to which the Base Salary and Bonus subject to such direction are earned (or, with respect to the first period of eligibility, such direction shall be irrevocable on the last day of the 30-day election period with respect to Base Salary and Bonus earned during the same Plan Year after the election).  An Executive may change or revoke a direction with respect to the deferral of Base Salary and Bonus earned in a subsequent Plan Year at any time prior to such direction becoming irrevocable.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, all Executives shall be required to make a deferral election for the 2005 Plan Year by December 31, 2004, and prior elections shall not be given any further force or effect (except that the Executive’s Bonus Deferral election for the Bonus that is earned in the 2004 Plan Year shall continue in effect in accordance with its terms).

 

(2)                                  Automatic Termination/Suspension of Deferral Election .

 

(a)                                  An Executive Deferral direction pursuant to Section 3.1 shall automatically terminate on the date of the Executive’s Separation from Service and with respect to any compensation for services performed after such Executive’s Separation from Service or, to the extent permitted by the 409A Guidance, on the date the Plan is terminated.

 

(b)                                  An Executive’s direction pursuant to Section 3.1 shall automatically be cancelled from the first day of the first payroll period in which the Executive receives a hardship distribution under the Traditional Savings Plan, or Savings Plan or a distribution due to an Unforeseeable Emergency under this Plan through the last day of the Plan Year containing the six-month anniversary date of such hardship distribution or such distribution due to an Unforeseeable Emergency, but will automatically be reinstated thereafter (unless otherwise changed in accordance with Subsection (1) hereof).

 

SECTION 3.3  Matching Contributions .

 

(1)                                  Matching Contributions With Respect to Salary Deferrals .

 

(a)                                  The Employers shall credit the Account of an Executive with an amount (the “Matching Contributions”) determined as follows:  (i) with respect to an Executive who is participating in the Traditional Savings Plan, the Matching Contribution shall be equal to the sum of (1) 100% of the Salary Deferrals which do not exceed 3% of the Executive’s Base Salary and (2) 50% of the Salary Deferrals which exceed 3% of the Executive’s Base Salary but do not exceed 5% of the Executive’s Base Salary, or (ii) with respect to an Executive who is participating in the Savings Plan, the Matching Contribution shall be equal to the sum of (1) 100% of the Salary Deferrals which do not exceed 4% of the Executive’s Base Salary and (2)

 

7



 

50% of the Salary Deferrals which exceed 4% of the Executive’s Base Salary but do not exceed 8% of the Executive’s Base Salary; and the amount of the Executive’s Base Salary that shall be taken into account under this Section 3.3(1)(a) shall be the amount of the Executive’s Base Salary for such Plan Year that exceeds the maximum compensation which could be considered under the Savings Plan, or Traditional Savings Plan under Section 401(a)(17) of the Code.  Executives employed by Nalco Company, Champion Technologies, Inc., Corsicana Technologies, Inc., or any successor entities thereto, who are eligible to participate in the Plan during the 2014 Plan Year will be deemed to have elected to contribute to this Plan 8% of their Base Salary that exceeds the maximum compensation which could be considered under the Savings Plan under Section 401(a)(17) of the Code.

 

(b)                                  The Employers shall also credit the Account of an Executive with an additional Matching Contribution in an amount determined by the Administrator, which amount is equal to the amount of matching contributions (plus earnings allocable thereto) which the Executive is required to forfeit under the Savings Plan, or Traditional Savings Plan due to the application of the before-tax nondiscrimination requirements of the Code (the “True-Up Matching Contributions”).

 

(2)                                  Matching Contributions With Respect to Bonus Deferrals .  The Employers shall credit the Account of an Executive with a Matching Contribution determined as follows: (i) with respect to an Executive who is participating in the Traditional Savings Plan, the Matching Contribution shall be equal to the sum of (1) 100% of the first 3% of the Executive’s Bonus Deferral and (2) 50% of the next 2% of the Executive’s Bonus Deferral, or (ii) with respect to an Executive who is participating in the Savings Plan, the Matching Contribution shall be equal to the sum of (1) 100% of the first 4% of the Executive’s Bonus Deferral and (2) 50% of the next 4% of the Executive’s Bonus Deferral; and the amount of the Executive’s Bonus that shall be taken into account under this Section 3.3(2) shall not exceed the excess of the Executive’s Base Salary and Bonus in respect of the Plan Year in which the Bonus was earned (excluding severance) over the maximum compensation which could be considered under the Savings Plan, or Traditional Savings Plan in such Plan Year under Section 401(a)(17) of the Code, and further provided that an Executive’s Bonus shall be taken into account under this Section 3.3(2) only to the extent the Executive has elected to defer payment of such Bonus under Section 3.1(2) for the Plan Year.

 

SECTION 3.4  Executives’ Accounts .  Each Employer shall establish and maintain on its books an Account for each Executive which shall contain the following entries:

 

(1)                                  Credits for the Executive Deferrals described in Section 3.1, which Executive Deferrals shall be credited to the Executive’s Account at the time such Executive Deferrals would otherwise have been paid to the Executive;

 

(2)                                  Credits for the Matching Contributions described in Section 3.3(1)(a), which Matching Contributions shall be credited to the Executive’s Account at the same time as the underlying Salary Deferrals are credited thereto; but no earlier than when the Executive has received (or has been deemed to receive) the maximum Matching Contribution available under the Savings Plan, or Traditional Savings Plan (as determined by the Administrator);

 

8



 

(3)                                  Credits for the True-Up Matching Contributions described in Section 3.3(1)(b) at the time designated by the Administrator following the end of the Plan Year when the nondiscrimination test results under the Savings Plan, or Traditional Savings Plan are known;

 

(4)                                  Credits for the Matching Contributions described in Section 3.3(2), which Matching Contributions shall be credited to the Executive’s Account at the same time as the underlying Bonus Deferrals are credited thereto;

 

(5)                                  Credits or charges (including income, expenses, gains and losses) equal to the amounts which would have been attributable to the Executive Deferrals and Matching Contributions if such amounts had been invested on a tax deferred basis in the Hypothetical Investment Fund(s) in which such amounts are deemed to have been invested under Section 6.1.  The entries provided by this Subsection (5) shall continue to be made until the Executive’s entire vested Account has been distributed pursuant to Article IV;

 

(6)                                  Debits for any distributions made from the Account pursuant to Article IV;

 

(7)                                  The Employers shall make the above-described credits and debits to the Executive’s Pre-2005 Sub-Account or the Post-2004 Sub-Account, as applicable, in accordance with the 409A Guidance; and

 

(8)                                  Effective as of January 1, 2009, separate debits and credits shall be made to the Primary Deferrals Sub-Account and the Secondary Deferrals Sub-Account of each Participant.

 

SECTION 3.5  Statement of Account .  The Company shall deliver to each Executive a written statement of his Account not less frequently that annually as of the end of each Plan Year.

 

ARTICLE IV
PAYMENT OF MIRROR SAVINGS BENEFITS

 

SECTION 4.1  Time of Payment .

 

(1)                                  Payment to Executives .

 

(a)                                  An Executive shall be entitled to receive his Account upon the earlier of (i) with respect to the Executive’s Pre-2005 Sub-Account, the date on which his or her employment terminates due to Disability or (ii) the date of his or her termination of employment with the Controlled Group for any reason, including retirement (or, with respect to amounts that are allocated to an Executive’s Post-2004 Sub-Account, thirty (30) days after the date of his or her Separation from Service (or, in the case of the Executive’s election pursuant to Section 4.2(3)(b)(ii)(B), on the date specified in such Section); provided, however, that distribution made on account of Separation from Service shall be made, or commence to be made, with respect to a Specified Employee on the first day of the month coincident with or next following the date that is six months after the date of the Separation from Service of the Specified Employee (or, if earlier, the date of death), to the extent that Code

 

9



 

Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) is applicable, except that where the Executive makes an election pursuant to Section 4.2(3)(b)(ii)(B), payment will be made on the date specified in such Section).  In the case of installment payments, the first payment made to the Specified Employee following the 6-month delay shall be made on the first day of the seventh month following the Separation from Service and shall include any Mirror Savings Benefit payments that were not made as a result of the delay in payment pursuant to this paragraph (a).

 

(b)                                  Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company may at any time, upon written request of the Executive, cause to be paid to such Executive an amount equal to all or any part of the Executive’s vested Account, other than the portion of his or her Account attributable to Matching Contributions, if the Administrator determines, in its sole and absolute discretion based on such reasonable evidence as it may require, that such a payment or payments is necessary for the purpose of alleviating the consequences of an Unforeseeable Emergency.  Payments made on account of an Unforeseeable Emergency shall be permitted only to the extent the amount does not exceed the amount reasonably necessary to satisfy the emergency need (plus, with respect to payments made from an Executive’s Post-2004 Sub-Account, an amount necessary to pay taxes reasonably anticipated as a result of the distribution) and may not be made to the extent such Unforeseeable Emergency is or may be relieved through reimbursement or compensation by insurance or otherwise, by liquidation of the Executive’s assets (to the extent such liquidation would not itself cause severe financial hardship) or, to the extent permitted by the 409A Guidance, by cessation of the Executive Deferrals under this Plan.  However, the determination of amounts reasonably necessary to satisfy the emergency need is not required to take into account any additional compensation that due to the Unforeseeable Emergency is available under another nonqualified deferred compensation plan but has not actually been paid.

 

(c)                                   Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, if the payment of all or any portion of an Executive’s Account would, in the sole opinion of the Company on the advice of its counsel, result in a profit recoverable by the Company under Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, but for the operation of this paragraph, then such payment (or portion thereof) shall be deferred and made at the earliest time that such payment (or portion thereof) would no longer be subject to Section 16(b), to the extent permitted by the 409A Guidance.

 

(2)                                  Payment to Death Beneficiaries .  The Death Beneficiary of a deceased Executive shall be entitled to receive the vested Account of the Executive upon the death of the Executive.  The Executive’s vested Account shall be distributed to the Death Beneficiary on the sixtieth (60 th ) day after the Executive’s death.

 

SECTION 4.2  Form of Payment .

 

(1)                                  Payment in Cash .  All distributions under the Plan shall be made in the form of cash.

 

10



 

(2)                                  Normal Forms of Payment .

 

(a)                                  Payments to Executives .

 

(i)                                      Pre-2005 Sub-Accounts .  Unless otherwise elected pursuant to Section 4.2(3), an Executive’s Pre-2005 Sub-Account shall be distributed to the Executive in the form of a single lump sum payment.

 

(ii)                                   Post-2004 Sub-Accounts .  Unless otherwise elected pursuant to Section 4.2(3), an Executive’s Post-2004 Sub-Account shall be distributed to the Executive in the form of annual installment payments payable over a period of ten (10) years.

 

(b)                                  Payments to Death Beneficiaries .  An Executive’s Mirror Savings Benefit (or the remaining installments thereof if payment to the Executive had commenced) shall be distributed to his or her Death Beneficiary in the form of a single lump sum payment.

 

(c)                                   Small Benefits .  Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, in the event that (i) an Executive’s Pre-2005 Sub-Account does not exceed $25,000, such Sub-Account shall be paid to the Executive in the form of a single lump sum payment at termination of employment with the Controlled Group, and (ii) an Executive’s Post-2004 Sub-Account does not exceed $25,000, such Sub-Account shall be paid to the Executive in the form of a single lump sum payment at Separation from Service.

 

(d)                                  Payment of Minimum Benefits .  Notwithstanding the foregoing, an Executive’s Minimum Benefit shall be paid in the form previously elected by the Executive under the Prior Plan, and such election shall remain in full force and effect through the date of distribution.

 

(3)                                  Optional Forms of Payment for Executives .

 

(a)                                  In General .  An Executive who does not want his or her Mirror Savings Benefit to be paid in the normal form of benefit described in Section 4.2(2)(a) may elect to receive his Pre-2005 Sub-Account in the form of annual installment payments payable over a period not exceeding ten years (as elected by the Executive) and may elect to receive his Post-2004 Sub-Account in the form of a single lump sum payment or in the form of annual installment payments payable over a period of five (5) or ten (10) years (as elected by the Executive); provided, however, the election provided by this Section 4.2(3) shall not apply to the Executive’s Minimum Benefit.  The amount of each installment payment will be determined by dividing the balance of the Executive’s Mirror Savings Benefit as of the distribution date for such installment payment by the total number of remaining payments (including the current payment).  Effective as of January 1, 2009, an Executive may make separate payment elections under this Section 4.2(3) with respect to the Executive’s Primary Deferrals Sub-Account and Secondary Deferrals Sub-Account.

 

11



 

(b)                                  Form/Timing of Election .

 

(i)                                      Pre-2005 Sub-Accounts .  Any election of an optional form of benefit made with respect to the Pre-2005 Sub-Account must be in writing (on a form provided by the Administrator) and filed with the Administrator prior to the Executive’s termination of employment with the Controlled Group because of involuntary termination, death or Disability or at least one (1) year prior to the Executive’s voluntary termination of employment or retirement.  Any such election may be changed at any time and from time to time without the consent of any other person (except as described in Section 2.4), by filing a later signed written election with the Administrator; provided that any election made less than one (1) year prior to the Executive’s voluntary termination of employment shall not be valid, and in such case, payment shall be made in the normal form as provided in Section 4.2(2).

 

(ii)                                   Post-2004 Sub-Accounts .

 

(A)                                In General .  Any election of an optional form of benefit made with respect to the Post-2004 Sub-Account must be in writing (on a form provided by the Administrator) and filed with the Administrator at the time the Executive first becomes eligible to participate in the Plan and makes his initial Executive Deferral election pursuant to Section 3.1.  Effective as of January 1, 2009, an Executive may make separate payment elections under this Section 4.2(3)(b)(ii) with respect to the Executive’s Primary Deferrals Sub-Account and Secondary Deferrals Sub-Account.

 

(B)                                Subsequent Elections .  An Executive may change his election of an optional form of benefit made pursuant to Section 4.2(3)(b)(ii)(A), (B) or (C).  Any change will be considered made when it becomes irrevocable under the terms of the Plan.  Any properly completed subsequent election will be considered irrevocable on the date it is received and accepted by the Administrator (but not later than fifteen (15) days following receipt), subject to the following:

 

(x)                                  the subsequent election may not take effect until at least twelve (12) months after the date on which the election is made;

 

(y)                                  the election must be made not less than twelve (12) months before the payment is schedule to be paid; and

 

(z)                                   the payment (except in the case of death, Disability or Unforeseeable Emergency) of the Executive’s Post-2004 Sub-Account (or, effective January 1, 2009, the Executive’s Primary Deferrals Sub-Account and Secondary Deferrals Sub-Account) pursuant to such subsequent election shall be made or commence to be made on the date that is five (5) years after the date the payment would otherwise be paid

 

12



 

(or for installment payments treated as a single payment, the date the first amount was otherwise scheduled to be paid).

 

(C)                                Transition Elections .  Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, an Executive may elect, without regard to the five-year delay (as would be required under Section 4.2(3)(b)(ii)(B)), to receive each of his or her Primary Deferrals Sub-Account and Secondary Deferrals Sub-Account in a lump sum payment or in the form of five-year or ten-year annual installment payments, to be made or commence on the date of his or her Separation from Service.  The transition election made under this clause (C) must be made no later than December 31, 2008 and may not cause any amount to be paid in 2008 if not otherwise payable and may not delay beyond 2008 payment of any amount that is otherwise payable in 2008.

 

ARTICLE V
VESTING

 

SECTION 5.1  Vesting .

 

(1)                                  In General .  An Executive shall always be 100% vested in both his Executive Deferrals and his Minimum Benefit under the Plan.  Subject to the provisions of Subsection (2) of this Section, an Executive who is credited with an Hour of Service on or after March 1, 2002 shall be immediately 100% vested in all Matching Contributions hereunder.

 

(2)                                  Forfeiture Provisions .

 

(a)                                  Notwithstanding the provisions of Subsection (1) hereof, but subject to the requirements of paragraph (b) of this Subsection, the Employers shall be relieved of any obligation to pay or provide any future Mirror Savings Plan Benefits under this Plan and shall be entitled to recover amounts already distributed if, without the written consent of the Company, the Executive, whether before or after termination with the Controlled Group (i) participates in dishonesty, fraud, misrepresentation, embezzlement or deliberate injury or attempted injury, in each case related to the Company or a Controlled Group member, (ii) commits any unlawful or criminal activity of a serious nature, (iii) commits any intentional and deliberate breach of a duty or duties that, individually or in the aggregate, are material in relation to the Executive’s overall duties or (iv) materially breaches any confidentiality or noncompete agreement entered into with the Company or a Controlled Group member.  The Employers shall have the burden of proving that one of the foregoing events has occurred.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, the provisions of this Subsection 2(a) shall not apply to an Executive’s Minimum Benefit or the portion of the Executive’s Account which is attributable to his Executive Deferrals.

 

(b)                                  Notwithstanding the foregoing, an Executive shall not forfeit any portion of his Mirror Savings Plan Benefits under paragraph (a) of this Subsection unless (i) the Executive receives reasonable notice in writing setting forth the

 

13



 

grounds for the forfeiture, (ii) if requested by the Executive, the Executive (and/or the Executive’s counsel or other representative) is granted a hearing before the full Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) and (iii) a majority of the members of the full Board determine that the Executive violated one or more of the provisions of paragraph (a) of this Subsection.

 

ARTICLE VI
INVESTMENT OF ACCOUNTS

 

SECTION 6.1  Hypothetical Investment Funds .

 

(1)                                  Hypothetical Investment Fund for Matching Contributions on or after January 1, 2006 .  Matching Contributions made on or after January 1, 2006 shall be deemed to be made in cash and invested in accordance with the Hypothetical Investment Fund election(s) in effect from time to time for Executive Deferrals under Subsection (2) below.

 

(2)                                  Hypothetical Investment Funds for Executive Deferrals .  To the extent permitted by the 409A Guidance, the Hypothetical Investment Funds for purposes of the portion of an Executive’s Account which is attributable to his Executive Deferrals shall be those same Investment Funds designated by the Company under the Savings Plan, provided, however that effective January 1, 2006, the Ecolab Stock Fund will not be a Hypothetical Investment Fund with respect to the investment of Executive Deferrals made on or after January 1, 2006.  Each Executive (or his Death Beneficiary) may elect, in a manner prescribed by the Administrator from time to time, one or more Hypothetical Investment Funds in which his Executive Deferrals are deemed to have been invested for purposes of crediting earnings and losses to the portion of the Executive’s Account which is attributable to Executive Deferrals, provided, however, that effective January 1, 2006, no Executive or Death Beneficiary may elect the Ecolab Stock Fund as a Hypothetical Investment Fund with respect to Executive Deferrals.  The Company may deem an Executive’s Executive Deferrals to have been invested in the Hypothetical Investment Fund elected by the Executive, if any, or may instead, in its sole discretion, deem such Executive Deferrals to have been invested in one or more Hypothetical Investment Funds selected by the Company.  Earnings on any amounts deemed to have been invested in any Hypothetical Investment Fund shall be deemed to have been reinvested in such Hypothetical Investment Fund.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, any Executive who is subject to Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 may not elect and shall not be deemed to have directed any Executive Deferrals to the Ecolab Stock Fund.  An Executive shall be deemed, on the day prior to becoming subject to Section 16(b) or at such other time as he is subject to Section 16(b), to have elected to have Executive Deferrals then deemed to be invested in the Ecolab Stock Fund invested in the Hypothetical Investment Fund that under the Savings Plan is designated as a default investment fund, unless another permitted election is in place.

 

(3)                                  Expenses of Hypothetical Investment Funds .  The Hypothetical Investment Funds shall bear and be charged with actual or hypothetical expenses to the same extent that the corresponding Ecolab Stock Fund and other Investment Funds in the Savings Plan bear and are charged with such expenses, as determined by the Administrator.

 

14



 

ARTICLE VII
MISCELLANEOUS

 

SECTION 7.1  Effect of Amendment and Termination .  Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan (including the Administrative Document) to the contrary, no amendment or termination of the Plan shall, without the consent of the Executive (or, in the case of his death, his Death Beneficiary), adversely affect the vested Account under the Plan of any Executive or Death Beneficiary as such Account exists on the date of such amendment or termination; provided, however, that this limitation shall not apply to any amendment or termination that is deemed necessary or reasonable (as determined in the sole discretion of the Committee) to comply with the requirements of the 409A Guidance.

 

SECTION 7.2  Limitation on Payments and Benefits .  Notwithstanding any provision of this Plan to the contrary, if any amount or benefit to be paid or provided under this Plan or any other plan or agreement between the Executive and a Controlled Group member would be an “Excess Parachute Payment,” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code, or any successor provision thereto, but for the application of this sentence, then the payments and benefits to be paid or provided under this Plan shall be reduced to the minimum extent necessary (but in no event to less than zero) so that no portion of any such payment or benefit, as so reduced, constitutes an Excess Parachute Payment; provided, however, that the foregoing reduction shall be made only if and to the extent that such reduction would result in an increase in the aggregate payment and benefits to be provided to the Executive, determined on an after-tax basis (taking into account the excise tax imposed pursuant to Section 4999 of the Code, or any successor provision thereto, any tax imposed by any comparable provision of state law, and any applicable federal, state and local income taxes).  If requested by the Executive or the Company, the determination of whether any reduction in such payments or benefits to be provided under this Plan or otherwise is required pursuant to the preceding sentence shall be made by the Company’s independent accountants, at the expense of the Company, and the determination of the Company’s independent accountants shall be final and binding on all persons.  The fact that the Executive’s right to payments or benefits may be reduced by reason of the limitations contained in this Section 7.2 shall not of itself limit or otherwise affect any other rights of the Executive pursuant to this Plan.  The Executive’s Mirror Savings Benefit will be reduced only to the extent that the reduction in any cash payments due to the Executive, the Executive’s SERP Benefits (if any) and the Executive’s Mirror Pension Plan Benefits is insufficient to reduce or eliminate Excess Parachute Payment as described in this Section.  The Executive’s Post-2004 Sub-Account (if any) shall be reduced if required by this Section before any Pre-2005 Sub-Account is reduced.

 

SECTION 7.3  Establishment of a Trust Fund .

 

(1)                                  In General .  The Plan is intended to be an unfunded, non-qualified retirement plan.  However, the Company may enter into a trust agreement with a trustee to establish a trust fund (the “Trust Fund”) and to transfer assets thereto (or cause assets to be transferred thereto), subject to the claims of the creditors of the Employers, pursuant to which some or all of the Mirror Savings Plan Benefits shall be paid.  Payments from the Trust Fund shall discharge the Employers’ obligation to make payments under the Plan to the extent that Trust Fund assets are used to satisfy such obligations.

 

15



 

(2)                                  Upon a Change in Control .

 

(a)                                  Within thirty (30) business days of the occurrence of a Change in Control, to the extent it has not already done so, the Company shall be required to establish an irrevocable Trust Fund for the purpose of paying Mirror Savings Plan Benefits.  Except as described in the following sentence, all contributions to the Trust Fund shall be irrevocable and the Company shall not have the right to direct the trustee to return to the Employers, or divert to others, any of the assets of the Trust Fund until after satisfaction of all liabilities to all of the Executives and their Death Beneficiaries under the Plan.  Any assets deposited in the Trust Fund shall be subject to the claims of the creditors of the Employers and any excess assets remaining in the Trust Fund after satisfaction of all liabilities shall revert to the Company.

 

(b)                                  In addition to the requirements described in paragraph (a) above, the Trust Fund which becomes effective on the Change in Control shall be subject to the following additional requirements:

 

(i)                                      the trustee of the Trust Fund shall be a third party corporate or institutional trustee;

 

(ii)                                   the Trust Fund shall satisfy the requirements of a grantor trust under the Code; and

 

(iii)                                the Trust Fund shall automatically terminate (A) in the event that it is determined by a final decision of the United States Department of Labor (or, if an appeal is taken therefrom, by a court of competent jurisdiction) that by reason of the creation of, and a transfer of assets to, the Trust, the Trust is considered “funded” for purposes of Title I of ERISA or (B) in the event that it is determined by a final decision of the Internal Revenue Service (or, if an appeal is taken therefrom, by a court of competent jurisdiction) that (I) a transfer of assets to the Trust is considered a transfer of property for purposes of Code Section 83 or any successor provision thereto, or (II) pursuant to Code Section 451 or 409A or any successor provision thereto, amounts are includable as compensation in the gross income of a Trust Fund beneficiary in a taxable year that is prior to the taxable year or years in which such amounts would otherwise be actually distributed or made available to such beneficiary by the trustee.  Upon such termination of the Trust, all of the assets in the Trust Fund attributable to the accrued Mirror Savings Plan Benefits shall be immediately distributed to the Executives (but only to the extent and in the manner permitted by the 409A Guidance), and the remaining assets, if any, shall revert to the Company.

 

(c)                                   Within five (5) days following establishment of the Trust Fund, the Company shall transfer (or cause the Employers to transfer) to the trustee of such Trust Fund an amount equal to all 100% of the Account balances of all of the Executives under the Plan.

 

(d)                                  Following the funding of the Trust Fund pursuant to paragraph (a) above, the Company shall cause to be deposited in the Trust Fund additional

 

16



 

Executive Deferrals and Matching Contributions, as such amounts are credited to the Accounts of the Executives pursuant to Section 3.4 hereof.

 

(e)                                   Notwithstanding the foregoing, an Employer shall not be required to make any contributions to the Trust Fund if the Employer is Insolvent at the time such contribution is required.

 

(f)                                    The Administrator shall notify the trustee of the amount of Mirror Savings Plan Benefits to be paid to the Executive (or his Death Beneficiary) from the Trust Fund and shall assist the trustee in making distribution thereof in accordance with the terms of the Plan.

 

(g)                                   Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan or the Administrative Document to the contrary, the provisions of this Section 7.3(2) hereof (i) may not be amended following a Change in Control and (ii) prior to a Change in Control may only be amended (A) with the written consent of each of the Executives or (B) if the effective date of such Amendment is at least two years following the date the Executives were given written notice of the adoption of such amendment; provided, however, that this limitation shall not apply to any amendment that is deemed necessary or reasonable (as determined in the sole discretion of the Committee) to comply with the requirements of the 409A Guidance.

 

SECTION 7.4  Delay of Payments Subject to Code Section 162(m) .  The Company may delay the distribution of any amount otherwise required to be distributed under the Plan if, and to the extent that, the Company reasonably anticipates that the Company’s deduction with respect to such distribution otherwise would be limited or eliminated by application of Section 162(m) of the Code.  In such event, (1) if any payment is delayed during any year on account of Code Section 162(m), then all payments that could be delayed on account of Code Section 162(m) during such year must also be delayed; (2) such delayed payments must be paid either (a) in the first year in which the Company reasonably anticipates the payment to be deductible, or (b) the period beginning on the date of the Executive’s Separation From Service and ending on the later of the end of the Executive’s year of separation or the fifteenth (15th) day of the third month after such separation; and (3) if payment is delayed to the date of Separation from Service with respect to an Executive who is a Specified Employee, such payment shall commence after such Executive’s Separation from Service on the date immediately following the six-month anniversary of the Separation from Service, or if earlier, on the date of the Executive’s death.

 

17



 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the Company has caused this instrument to be executed by its authorized officers and its corporate seal to be affixed, on the date written below.

 

 

Dated:  December 23, 2013

 

 

ECOLAB INC.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/Daniel J. Schmechel

(Seal)

 

 

Daniel J. Schmechel

 

 

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

Attest:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/James J. Seifert

 

 

 

James J. Seifert

 

 

 

Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

 

 

 

 

18


Exhibit (10.13)

 

ECOLAB MIRROR PENSION PLAN

 

(As Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2014)

 

WHEREAS, Ecolab Inc. (the “Company”) has established the Ecolab Pension Plan (the “Pension Plan”), a qualified defined benefit pension plan; and

 

WHEREAS, Sections 401(a)(17) and 415 of the Code place certain limitations on the amount of benefits that would otherwise be made available under the Pension Plan for certain participants; and

 

WHEREAS, the Company previously established the Ecolab Mirror Pension Plan (the “Plan”) to provide the benefits which would otherwise have been payable to such participants under the Pension Plan except for such limitations, in consideration of services performed and to be performed by such participants for the Company and certain related corporations; and

 

WHEREAS, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, PX. 108-357 (the “AJCA”) added a new Section 409A to the Code, which significantly changed the Federal tax law applicable to “amounts deferred” under the Plan after December 31, 2004; and

 

WHEREAS, before the issuance by the U.S. Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) of interpretive guidance with respect to Code Section 409A, the Company amended the Plan to temporarily freeze the accrual of Mirror Pension Benefits hereunder as of December 31, 2004; and

 

WHEREAS, the IRS and U.S. Treasury subsequently issued regulations and other guidance regarding the requirements of and compliance with Code Section 409A; and

 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company directed and authorized appropriate officers of the Company to amend the Plan to (a) reinstate the accrual of Mirror Pension Benefits, effective retroactively as of January 1, 2005 and (b) comply, with respect to the Non-Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefits thereunder, with the requirements of Code Section 409 and guidance issued thereunder; and

 

WHEREAS, the Plan was amended and restated in its entirety, effective as of January 1, 2005; and

 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized the appropriate officers of the Company to amend the Plan (i) to use the lump sum actuarial factors to determine the annual installment payment amount (including an increase in installment payments that were commenced prior to January 1, 2011), and (ii) to include an actuarial increase in the non-grandfathered portion of any Standard Mirror Pension Benefit payments that are required to be deferred as a result of the five (5) year redeferral rule to a date that is after the later of termination of employment or age 62; and

 

WHEREAS, the Plan was amended and restated in its entirety, effective as of December 31, 2010 and again effective as of January 1, 2011; and

 

WHEREAS, the Company wishes to amend the Plan document to revise the date subsequent distribution elections become irrevocable under the Plan and the date by which an actuarially equivalent optional form of annuity may be selected.

 



 

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Plan and Section 5.1 of the Ecolab Inc. Administrative Document for Non-Qualified Benefit Plans, the Company hereby amends and restates the Plan in its entirety, effective as of January 1, 2014, to read as follows:

 

ARTICLE I
PREFACE

 

Section 1.1                                     Effective Date .

 

(1)                                  The effective date of this amended and restated Plan is January 1, 2014.

 

(2)                                  The benefit, if any, payable with respect to a former Executive who Retired or died prior to January 1, 2005 (and who is not rehired by a member of the Controlled Group thereafter) shall be determined by, and paid in accordance with, the terms and provisions of the Plan as in effect prior to January 1, 2005, subject to Section 1.4 and 3.2(2)(c).  Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, an Executive’s Mirror Pension Benefit (which was temporarily frozen from December 31, 2004 through December 31, 2008) shall be retroactively adjusted on January 1, 2009 to reflect the benefit that would have been accrued by the Executive under the Plan, in accordance with Section 3.1, during the period commencing on January 1, 2005 and ending on the earlier of December 31, 2008 or the date on which the Executive terminates his services with all Employers as an employee.

 

Section 1.2                                     Purpose of the Plan .  The purpose of this Plan is to provide additional retirement benefits for certain management and highly compensated employees of the Company who perform management and professional functions for the Company and certain related entities.

 

Section 1.3                                     Administrative Document .  This Plan includes the Ecolab Inc. Administrative Document for Non-Qualified Benefit Plans (the “Administrative Document”), which is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Section 1.4                                     American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (AJCA) .

 

(1)                                  To the extent applicable, it is intended that the Plan (including all Amendments thereto) comply with the provisions of Code Section 409A, as enacted by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, P.L. 108-357 (the “AJCA”), so as to prevent the inclusion in gross income of any amount of Mirror Pension Benefit accrued hereunder in a taxable year that is prior to the taxable year or years in which such amounts would otherwise be actually distributed or made available to the Executives.  The Plan shall be administered in a manner that will comply with Code Section 409A, including regulations or any other guidance issued by the Secretary of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service with respect thereto (collectively with the AJCA, the “409A Guidance”).  All Plan provisions shall be interpreted in a manner consistent with the 409A Guidance.

 

(2)                                  The Administrator shall not take any action hereunder that would violate any provision of Code Section 409A.  The Administrator is authorized to adopt rules or regulations deemed necessary or appropriate in connection with the 409A Guidance to anticipate and/or comply with the requirements thereof (including any transition or grandfather rules thereunder).

 

(3)                                  Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan, any Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefits (including any Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefits attributable thereto) shall continue to be governed by the law applicable to nonqualified deferred compensation prior to the addition of Section 409A to the Code and shall be subject to the terms and conditions specified in the Plan as in effect prior to January 1, 2005, except as otherwise provided herein.  Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the

 



 

contrary, neither the Company nor the Administrator guarantee to any Executive or Death Beneficiary any specific tax consequences of participation in or entitlement to or receipt of benefits from, the Plan, and each Executive or the Executive’s Death Beneficiary shall be solely responsible for payment of any taxes or penalties incurred in connection with his participation in the Plan.

 

ARTICLE II
DEFINITIONS

 

Words and phrases used herein with initial capital letters which are defined in the Administrative Document or the Pension Plan are used herein as so defined, unless otherwise specifically defined herein or the context clearly indicates otherwise.  The following words and phrases when used in this Plan with initial capital letters shall have the following respective meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:

 

Section 2.1                                     Actuarial Equivalent ” or “ Actuarially Equivalent .” A benefit is the “Actuarial Equivalent” of another benefit if, on the basis of Actuarial Factors, the present values of such benefits are equal.

 

Section 2.2                                     Actuarial Factors ” shall mean the actuarial assumptions set forth in Exhibit A which is attached to and forms a part of this Plan.

 

Section 2.3                                     Code Limitations ” shall mean the limitations imposed by Code Sections 401(a)(17) and 415, or any successor(s) thereto, on the amount of the benefits which may be payable to or with respect to an Executive from the Pension Plan.

 

Section 2.4                                     Death Beneficiary ” shall mean the beneficiary designated under this Plan and the SERP.  The designation of a Death Beneficiary may be made, and may be revoked or changed only by an instrument (in form prescribed by Administrator) signed by the Executive and delivered to the Administrator during the Executive’s lifetime.  If the Executive is married on the date of his death and has been married to such spouse throughout the one-year period ending on the date of his death, his designation of a Death Beneficiary other than, or in addition to, his spouse under the Plan shall not be effective unless such spouse has consented in writing to such designation.  Any Mirror Pension Benefits remaining to be paid after the death of a Death Beneficiary (or a contingent Death Beneficiary, to the extent designated by the Executive) shall be paid to the Death Beneficiary’s estate.  If no Death Beneficiary is designated by the Executive or all designated Death Beneficiaries predecease the Executive, the Executive’s Death Beneficiary shall be his spouse, and if there is no surviving spouse, then the Executive’s estate.  The most recent Death Beneficiary designation on file with the Administrator will be given effect, and in the event of conflicting forms files simultaneously under this Plan and the SERP, the Death Beneficiary designation under the SERP will govern.

 

Section 2.5                                     Disability ” shall mean any medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than six months, where such impairment causes the Executive to be unable to perform the duties of his position of employment or any substantially similar position of employment.

 

Section 2.6                                     Executive ” shall mean an Employee of an Employer (1) whose Annual Compensation from the Employers for the preceding Plan Year exceeds the dollar limitation described in Code Section 401(a)(17), (2) who is a Participant in the Pension Plan, and (3) who is selected by the Administrator to participate in the Plan.  Once an Employee has satisfied the requirements of an Executive and commenced participation in the Plan, his participation may continue, notwithstanding the fact that his Annual Compensation is reduced below the limitation described in Code Section 401(a)(17),

 



 

until the Administrator determines, in his sole discretion, that the Employee would fail to satisfy the requirements of a “management or highly compensated employee” under ERISA.

 

Section 2.7                                     Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefit ” shall mean the portion of an Executive’s Mirror Pension Benefit that is deemed to have been deferred (within the meaning of the 409A Guidance) under the Plan before January 1, 2005 and that is equal to the present value as of December 31, 2004 of the vested Mirror Pension Benefit to which the Executive would be entitled under the Plan, as in effect on October 3, 2004, if the Executive voluntarily terminated employment with the Controlled Group without cause on December 31, 2004, and received a payment, on the earliest possible date allowed under the Plan, of his Mirror Pension Benefit in the form with the maximum value (increased in subsequent years to equal the present value of the benefit the Executive actually becomes entitled to receive, in the form and at the time actually paid, determined under the terms of the Plan as in effect on October 3, 2004, without regard to any services rendered or Compensation increases applicable after December 31, 2004).

 

Section 2.8                                     Mirror Savings Plan ” shall mean the Ecolab Mirror Savings Plan, as such plan may be amended from time to time.

 

Section 2.9                                     Mirror Pension Benefit ” shall mean the retirement benefit determined under Article III.

 

Section 2.10                              Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefit ” shall mean the pre-retirement benefit determined under Article IV.

 

Section 2.11                              Non-Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefit ” shall mean any Mirror Pension Benefit that is not a Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefit.

 

Section 2.12                              Plan ” shall mean this Ecolab Mirror Pension Plan, as it may be amended from time to time.

 

Section 2.13                              Separation from Service ” or to “ Separate from Service ” shall mean any termination of employment with the Controlled Group due to retirement, death, disability or other reason; provided, however, that no Separation from Service is deemed to occur while the Executive (1) is on military leave, sick leave, or other bona fide leave of absence that does not exceed six (6) months (or, in the case of Disability, twelve (12) months), or if longer, the period during which the Executive’s right to reemployment with the Controlled Group is provided either by statute or by contract, or (2) continues to perform services for the Controlled Group at an annual rate of fifty percent (50%) or more of the average level of services performed over the immediately preceding 36-month period (or the full period in which the Executive provided services (whether as an employee or as an independent contractor) if the Executive has been providing services for less than 36 months).  With respect to the terms of the Plan affecting Non-Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefits, any reference to “termination of employment” in the Plan shall mean Separation from Service as defined in this Section.  Whether an Executive has incurred a Separation from Service shall be determined in accordance with the 409A Guidance.

 

Section 2.14                              SERP ” shall mean the Ecolab Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as in effect from time to time.

 

Section 2.15                              SERP Benefit ” shall mean an Executive’s benefit accrued under the SERP.

 

Section 2.16                              Specified Employee ” shall mean “Specified Employee” as defined in the Administrative Document.

 



 

ARTICLE III
MIRROR PENSION BENEFITS

 

Section 3.1                                     Amount of Mirror Pension Benefits .

 

(1)                                  In General .  Each Executive whose benefits under the Pension Plan payable on or after the Effective Date are reduced due to the Code Limitations shall be entitled to a Mirror Pension Benefit, which shall be determined as hereinafter provided.

 

(2)                                  Standard Mirror Pension Benefits .  The Standard Mirror Pension Benefit shall be a monthly retirement benefit calculated using the final average pay benefit formula specified in Article 4 of the Pension Plan equal to the difference between (a) and (b), where:

 

(a)  =                 the amount of the monthly benefit payable to the Executive under the Pension Plan calculated on a single life annuity basis commencing at age 65, determined under the Pension Plan as in effect on the date of the Executive’s termination of employment with the Controlled Group but calculated as if (i) the Pension Plan did not contain the Code Limitations, and (ii) the definition of Annual Compensation under the Pension Plan included the Executive’s deferrals under the Mirror Savings Plan or its predecessor plan; and

 

(b)  =                 the amount of the monthly benefit which would be payable to the Executive under the Pension Plan calculated on a single life annuity basis commencing at age 65, determined under the Pension Plan as in effect on the date of the Executive’s termination of employment with the Controlled Group.

 

As a consequence of the freezing of benefit accruals under Section 4 of the Pension Plan as of December 31, 2020, the formula in this Section 3.1(2) will be applied by determining an Executive’s Annual Compensation and the monthly benefit under Section 4 of the Pension Plan as of December 31, 2020 (or, if earlier, as of the date of the Executive’s termination of employment with the Controlled Group).

 

(3)                                  Cash Balance Mirror Pension Benefits .  The Administrator shall establish an “Excess Retirement Account” for each Executive who is accruing benefits under the cash balance formula described in Article 6 of the Pension Plan.  As of the end of each calendar year (or at such other time as a Contribution Credit is made to the Executive’s Retirement Account under the Pension Plan), the Administrator shall credit each Executive’s Excess Retirement Account under this Plan with an amount equal to the difference between (a) and (b) where:

 

(a)   =                  the amount that would have been credited to the Executive’s Retirement Account under the Pension Plan if (i) the Pension Plan did not contain the Code Limitations, and (ii) the definition of Annual Compensation under the Pension Plan included the Executive’s deferrals under the Mirror Savings Plan; and

 

(b)   =                  the amount which is actually credited to the Executive’s Retirement Account under the Pension Plan.

 

The Administrator shall also credit each Executive’s Excess Retirement Account with Interest Credits in accordance with the rules specified in the Pension Plan.

 



 

As a consequence of the amendment of the accrual of benefits under Article 6 of the Pension Plan as of December 31, 2020, benefits under this Section 3.1(3) will accrue at the reduced 3% crediting rate for Annual Compensation paid after December 31, 2020.

 

(4)                                  Notwithstanding anything in this Section 3.1 to the contrary, in no event, will any Executive’s Mirror Pension Benefit be less than such Executive’s Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefit.

 

Section 3.2                                     Time of Payment .

 

(1)                                  Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefit .  The portion of an Executive’s vested Mirror Pension Benefit that is a Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefit shall be paid or commence to be paid at the same time and under the same conditions as the benefits payable to the Executive under the Pension Plan.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, if payment at such time is prevented due to reasons outside of the Administrator’s control, the vested Mirror Pension Benefits shall commence as soon as practicable after the benefits commence under the Pension Plan, and the first payment hereunder shall include any Mirror Pension Benefits not paid as a result of the delay in payment.

 

(2)                                  Non-Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefit .  The provisions of this Section 3.2(2) shall apply solely with respect to the portion of any Executive’s vested Mirror Pension Benefit that is a Non-Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefit.

 

(a)                                            Standard Mirror Pension Benefits .  The Executive’s Standard Mirror Pension Benefit shall be paid or commence to be paid on the first day of the third month following the month in which occurs the later of the date on which the Executive (i) attains age 55 or (ii) Separates from Service, subject to Sections 3.2(2)(d), and 3.3(2)(d) (as applicable).  The amount of any such Standard Mirror Pension Benefit paid before the Executive’s attainment of age 62 shall be actuarially reduced using the Actuarial Factors, as in effect on the date of the Executive’s Separation from Service.

 

(b)                                            Cash Balance Mirror Pension Benefit .  The Executive’s Cash Balance Mirror Pension Benefit shall be paid or commence to be paid on the first day of the third month following the month in which Executive Separates from Service, subject to Sections 3.2(2)(d) and 3.3(2)(d) (as applicable).

 

(c)                                             Certain Transition Distributions to Terminated Executives .  Notwithstanding Section 3.2(2)(a) and 3.2(2)(b) and subject to Section 3.2(2)(d),

 

(i)                                      An Executive who Separated from Service after December 31, 2004 and before December 31, 2008 and has commenced payments of his Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefits at any time before December 31, 2008, shall receive his Non-Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefit, for which the Executive’s Mirror Pension Benefit is retroactively adjusted pursuant to Section 1.1 on January 1, 2009, in the same form and at the same time as the Executive’s Grandfathered benefit, in the same form and at the same time as the Executive’s Grandfathered benefit, subject to Section 3.2(2)(d).  Notwithstanding the foregoing, an Executive’s Cash Balance Benefit shall be paid on March 1, 2009, subject to Section 3.2(2)(d).

 

(ii)                                   An Executive who Separated from Service after December 31, 2004 and before December 31, 2008 and has not before December 31, 2008 commenced payments of his Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefits shall receive his Non-

 



 

Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefits, for which the Executive’s Mirror Pension Benefit is retroactively adjusted pursuant to Section 1.1 on January 1, 2009, as follows, subject to Section 3.2(2)(d):

 

(A)                                The Executive’s Standard Mirror Pension Benefit shall be paid to the Executive in a single lump sum amount on the later of March 1, 2009 or the date on which the Executive attains age 55.

 

(B)                                The Executive’s Non-Grandfathered Cash Balance Mirror Pension Benefit credited to the Executive’s Excess Retirement Account under the Plan shall be paid in a single lump sum amount on March 1, 2009.

 

(d)                                            Payment Delay for Specified Employees .  Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan, payments to a Specified Employee shall be made or commence on the first day of the month coincident with or immediately following the latest of (i) the date specified in Section 3.2(2)(a), (b) or (c), (ii) the date specified in Section 3.3(2)(d)(i), if the Executive made an election pursuant to such section, or (iii) the date that is six (6) months after the Specified Employee’s Separation From Service; provided, however, that if the Executive dies before the date specified in (i), (ii) or (iii), the Executive’s benefit shall be paid or commence on the date specified in Section 4.2.  The first payment made to the Specified Employee following the 6-month delay shall include any Mirror Pension Benefit payments that were not made as a result of the delay in payment pursuant to this paragraph (d), with interest at an annual rate of five percent (5%).  Notwithstanding the foregoing, this paragraph (d) shall not apply to any Executive if on the date of his Separation from Service, the stock of the Company and Controlled Group members is not publicly traded on an established securities market (within the meaning of the 409A Guidance).

 

(e)                                             Delay of Payments Subject to Code Section 162(m) .  The Company may delay the distribution of any amount otherwise required to be distributed under the Plan if, and to the extent that, the Company reasonably anticipates that the Company’s deduction with respect to such distribution otherwise would be limited or eliminated by application of Code Section 162(m).  In such event, (i) if any payment is delayed during any year on account of Code Section 162(m), then all payments that could be delayed on account of Code Section 162(m) during such year must also be delayed; (ii) such delayed payments must be paid either (A) in the first year in which the Company reasonably anticipates the payment to be deductible, or (B) the period beginning on the date of the Executive’s Separation From Service and ending on the later of the end of the Executive’s year of separation or the fifteenth (15th) day of the third month after such separation; and (iii) if payment is delayed to the date of Separation from Service with respect to an Executive who is a Specified Employee, such payment shall commence after such Executive’s Separation from Service on the date immediately following the six-month anniversary of the Separation from Service, or if earlier, on the date of the Executive’s death.

 

(f)                                              Actuarial Adjustment for Delay on Account of Election Under Section 3.3(2)(d)(i) .  If an Executive’s election under Section 3.3(2)(d)(i) delays the commencement of the Executive’s Standard Mirror Pension Benefit portion of his or her Non-Grandfathered Mirror Pension beyond the later of the Executive’s Separation from Service or the date on which the Executive attains age 62, then such benefit will be actuarially increased using the Actuarial Factors for lump sum calculations, as in effect on the date the benefit payments were originally scheduled to be paid or commenced to be paid, provided, however, in no event will the interest rate exceed seven and one-half percent (7½%).

 



 

Section 3.3                                     Form of Payment of Mirror Pension Benefits .

 

(1)                                  Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefit .  The provisions of this Section 3.3(1) shall apply solely with respect to the portion of an Executive’s vested Standard Mirror Pension Benefit that is a Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefit.

 

(a)                                            In General .  The Standard Mirror Pension Benefit calculated in accordance with Section 3.1(2) shall be payable in the same form and for the same duration as the benefits payable to the Executive under the Pension Plan; provided, however, that if the form of payment of the Standard Mirror Pension Benefit selected by the Executive is not a single life annuity commencing at age 65, the amount of such Benefit shall be adjusted to an amount which results in a Benefit payable which is the Actuarial Equivalent of a single life annuity commencing at age 65.  An election by an Executive of a form of payment under the Pension Plan shall be deemed to be an election by such Executive of the form of his Standard Mirror Pension Benefit.  In the absence of an election by the Executive of the form of his Standard Mirror Pension Benefit under the Pension Plan, the form of Standard Mirror Pension Benefit for an unmarried Executive shall be a single life annuity commencing at age 65, and for a married Executive shall be a joint and 50% survivor benefit which is the Actuarial Equivalent of such single life annuity.

 

(b)                                            Lump Sum Election .

 

(i)                                      Notwithstanding the foregoing, an Executive may elect to receive the Standard Mirror Pension Benefit or to have his Death Beneficiary receive a Standard Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefit in the form of a single lump sum payment by filing a notice in writing on a form provided by the Administrator, signed by the Executive and filed with the Administrator prior to the Executive’s termination of employment with the Controlled Group because of involuntary termination, death or Disability, or at least one (1) year prior to the Executive’s voluntary retirement or termination of employment.  Any such election may be changed at any time and from time to time without the consent of any existing Death Beneficiary or any other person other than, if applicable, his spouse, by filing a later signed written election with the Administrator; provided that any election made less than one (1) year prior to the Executive’s voluntary retirement or termination of employment shall not be valid.  An Executive’s election of a lump sum payment under this Subsection shall be controlling with respect to any payment of Standard Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefits to his Death Beneficiary.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, an Executive shall be permitted to make an election to receive his Standard Mirror Pension Benefit in the form of a lump sum payment within the one (1) year period prior to his voluntary termination if (and only if) the amount of the Standard Mirror Pension Benefit payable to the Executive is reduced by ten percent (10%).

 

(ii)                                   The lump sum payment described in paragraph (b)(i) of this Subsection shall be calculated (A) by converting the Executive’s Standard Mirror Pension Benefit (calculated in accordance with the provisions of Section 3.1(2)) at the time of the commencement of such Benefit into a lump sum amount of equivalent actuarial value when computed using the Actuarial Factors for this purpose, and then applying the ten percent (10%) reduction, if applicable, or (B) by converting the Death Beneficiary’s Standard Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefit (calculated in accordance with the provisions of Section 4.2(1))

 



 

at the time of the commencement of such Benefit into a lump sum amount of equivalent actuarial value when computed using the Actuarial Factors for this purpose, and then applying the ten percent (10%) reduction, if applicable.

 

(iii)                                Notwithstanding any provision of this Plan to the contrary, in the event the equivalent actuarial value of the Executive’s Standard Mirror Pension Benefit, when computed using the Actuarial Factors specified in Exhibit A for this purpose, does not exceed $25,000, such Benefit shall be paid in the form of a single lump sum payment.

 

(c)                                             Cash Balance Mirror Pension Benefits .  Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, a Cash Balance Mirror Pension Benefit calculated in accordance with Section 3.1(3) shall automatically be paid to the Executive in the form of a single lump sum payment in an amount equal to the balance in the Executive’s Excess Retirement Account as the date the payment is processed.

 

(2)                                  Non-Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefits .  The provisions of this Section 3.3(2) shall apply solely with respect to the portion of an Executive’s vested Mirror Pension Benefit that is a Non-Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefit.

 

(a)                                            Normal Form of Payment .  Unless an Executive makes an election pursuant to Section 3.3(2)(b) or (e), the Executive’s Non-Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefit will be paid to the Executive in the form of annual installment payments payable over a period of ten (10) years, the amount of which is Actuarially Equivalent to the Mirror Pension Benefit calculated under Section 3.1.

 

(b)                                            Optional Forms of Payment .  In lieu of the normal form of payment, an Executive may make or change an election to receive his Non-Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefit in one of the following Actuarially Equivalent optional forms of benefit:

 

(i)                                      A single life annuity payable monthly to the Executive during the Executive’s life and ending on the date of the Executive’s death.

 

(ii)                                   A reduced joint and survivor annuity payable monthly to the Executive during the Executive’s life, and after the Executive’s death, payable monthly to the Executive’s spouse who survives the Executive in the amount equal to 50%, 75% or 100% (as the Executive elects) of such reduced lifetime monthly amount.

 

(iii)                                A reduced life and period certain annuity payable monthly to the Executive during the Executive’s life, with payment thereof guaranteed to be made for a period of five (5) or ten (10) years, as elected by the Executive, and, in the event of the Executive’s death before the end of such 5- or 10- year period, payable in the same reduced amount for the remainder of such 5- or 10- year period, to the Death Beneficiary designated by the Executive.

 

(iv)                               Annual installment payments payable to the Executive over a period of five (5) or ten (10) years, as elected by the Executive.

 

(v)                                  A single lump sum payment.

 



 

(c)                                             Mandatory Lump Sum .  Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, in the event that the present value of the Executive’s Non-Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefit does not exceed $25,000 at the time of distribution, such Non-Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefit shall be paid in the form of a single lump sum payment on the date of distribution determined under Section 3.2(2).

 

(d)                                            Election of Optional Form of Payment .  An election of an optional form of payment must be in writing (on a form provided by the Administrator) and must satisfy the following requirements:

 

(i)                                      If an Executive wishes to elect an optional form of payment under Section 3.3(2)(b) above (other than the normal form of payment) or, after December 31, 2008, wishes to change his election made under Section 3.3(2)(e) (other than an election change described in Section 3.3(2)(d)(ii)), the election will be considered made when it becomes irrevocable, which occurs when a properly completed form is received and accepted by the Administrator (but not later than fifteen (15) days following receipt), subject to the following:

 

(A)                                the election may not take effect until at least twelve (12) months after the date on which the election is made;

 

(B)                                the election must be made not less than twelve (12) months before the date the payment is scheduled to be paid; and

 

(C)                                the payment (except in the case of death or Disability) pursuant to an election made under this Section 3.3(2)(d)(i) shall be made or commence on the first day of the month coincident with or immediately following the fifth anniversary of the date the payment would otherwise be made (or for annuity or installment payments treated as a single payment, the date the first amount was otherwise scheduled to be paid).

 

(ii)                                   An Executive who elected, pursuant to Section 3.3(2)(d)(i) or 3.3(2)(e), a life annuity form of payment (within the meaning of the 409A Guidance) described in Section 3.3(2)(b)(i), (ii) or (iii), may, at any time before the date of the first payment under the annuity, change that annuity form of payment to an Actuarially Equivalent life annuity form of payment, provided the commencement date for such annuity, as specified in, respectively, Section 3.3(2)(d)(i) or Section 3.3(2)(e), remains unchanged.

 

(e)                                             Transition Elections .  Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan, any Executive who is an active employee of the Company or a member of the Controlled Group during the election period designated by the Administrator, ending no later than December 31, 2008, may make an election to receive his Non-Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefit in one of the optional forms specified in Section 3.3(2)(b), commencing on the date specified in Section 3.2(2)(a) or (b) (as applicable); provided, however, that such election shall not apply if the Executive Separates from Service on or before December 31, 2008 and is subject to the provision of Section 3.2(2)(c).  The transition election must be made in writing, on a form provided by the Administrator and filed with the Administrator within the designated transition election period.  The transition election made pursuant to this paragraph (e) may not cause any amount to be paid in 2008 if not otherwise payable and may not delay payment of any amount that is otherwise payable in 2008.

 



 

(f)                                              Coordination of Payment Elections with SERP .  If an Executive is also a participant in the SERP, the Executive’s Non-Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefit and the Non-Grandfathered SERP Benefit will be paid in the same form and at the same time.  If an Executive makes an election of an optional payment form pursuant to Section 3.3(2)(b) of the Plan or Section 3.4(2)(b) of the SERP, the most recent election made under either this Plan or the SERP that has become effective will govern the form and time of payment under the Plan.  In the event of conflicting elections made simultaneously under this Plan and the SERP, the election filed under the SERP shall govern.

 

Section 3.4                                     Death after Commencement of Non-Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefits .  If an Executive dies after commencing payment of his Non-Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefits under the Plan but before his entire Non-Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefit is distributed, payments to the Executive’s Death Beneficiary (if any) will be made (a) in accordance with the elected optional form of payment described in Section 3.3(2)(b)(ii) or (iii) (if elected), or (b) ninety (90) days after the Executive’s death in the form of a single lump sum, calculated using the Actuarial Factors in effect on the date of distribution, if the Executive elected one of the optional forms of payment described in Section 3.3(2)(b)(iv).

 

Section 3.5                                     Adjustment to Annual Installment Payments Commencing Prior to January 1, 2011 .  If payment of an Executive’s Non-Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefit commenced after January 1, 2005 but prior to January 1, 2011 in the form of annual installment payments over a period of five (5) or ten (10) years, then

 

(1)                                  The Executive’s annual installment payments will be recalculated as of the original payment commencement date using the Plan’s Actuarial Factors for lump sum calculations and any increase in the amount of each such installment will be paid as follows:

 

(a)                                            The increase in the annual installments that were payable prior to January 1, 2011 will be paid in a single lump sum amount in the calendar quarter beginning January 1, 2011 and ending March 31, 2011; and

 

(b)                                            Each annual installment due on or after January 1, 2011 will be adjusted to include the increase resulting from the recalculation.

 

ARTICLE IV
MIRROR PRE-RETIREMENT PENSION BENEFIT

 

Section 4.1                                     Eligibility .

 

(1)                                  Grandfathered Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefits .  The Death Beneficiary of an Executive who dies after attaining eligibility for a pre-retirement death benefit under the Pension Plan, but prior to commencing to receive Mirror Pension Benefits hereunder shall be entitled to receive the Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefits described in Section 4.2(1) in lieu of any other benefits described in the Plan.

 

(2)                                  Non-Grandfathered Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefits .  The Death Beneficiary of an Executive who dies after becoming vested in his Mirror Pension Benefit but prior to commencing to receive Mirror Pension Benefits hereunder shall be entitled to receive the Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefits described in Section 4.2(2) in lieu of any other benefits described in the Plan.

 



 

Section 4.2                                     Amount, Form and Timing of Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefits .

 

(1)                                  Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefits .  A Death Beneficiary who is eligible for a Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefit hereunder shall receive the portion of such Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefit that is based on the Executive’s Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefit in accordance with this Subsection (1).

 

(a)                                            Cash Balance Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefits .  A Death Beneficiary who is eligible for a Cash Balance Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefit shall receive a Cash Balance Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefit, payable at the same time as the pre-retirement death benefits and (if applicable) the optional death benefits described in the Pension Plan, as determined by the Administrator.  The Cash Balance Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefit shall automatically be paid in the form of a lump sum payment in an amount equal to the balance in the Executive’s Excess Retirement Account on the date the payment is processed.

 

(b)                                            Standard Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefits .  A Death Beneficiary who is eligible for a Standard Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefit shall receive a Standard Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefit based on the Executive’s Standard Mirror Pension Benefit hereunder.  The Standard Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefit shall be calculated in accordance with, and payable at the same time and (except as provided in Section 3.3(l)(b)) in the same manner as, the pre-retirement death benefits and (if applicable) the optional death benefits described in the Pension Plan, as determined by the Administrator.

 

(2)                                  Non-Grandfathered Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefits .  A Death Beneficiary who is eligible for a Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefit hereunder shall receive the portion of such Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefit that is based on the Executive’s vested Non-Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefit as follows:

 

(a)                                            Non-Grandfathered Cash Balance Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefits .  A Death Beneficiary who is eligible for a Non-Grandfathered Cash Balance Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefit shall receive such benefit in the form of a lump sum payment in an amount equal to the portion of the balance in the Executive’s Excess Retirement Account attributable to the Non-Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefit on the date the payment is processed.  The Non-Grandfathered Cash Balance Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefit shall be paid ninety (90) days after the Executive’s death.

 

(b)                                            Non-Grandfathered Standard Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefits .

 

(i)                                      If an Executive (A) is not married on the date of his death, (B) has been married for less than one year prior to his death and designates a Death Beneficiary other than his spouse, or (C) has been married for at least one year prior to his death and the Executive’s spouse consents to the Executive’s designation of a Death Beneficiary other than the spouse, the Executive’s Death Beneficiary shall receive his benefit in an amount Actuarially Equivalent to the survivor benefit determined as if the Executive had Separated From Service on the earlier of the date of his actual Separation from Service or the date of his death, elected to receive his Non-Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefit in the form of a monthly life annuity with a) a five (5) year certain survivor benefit if the Executive Separated from Service before attaining age 55, or b) a ten (10) year certain survivor benefit, if the Executive had attained age 55 while an Employee, had survived to age 55 and had died immediately following his

 



 

payment commencement date.  The Non-Grandfathered Standard Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefit shall be paid in the form of an Actuarially Equivalent single lump sum payment on the first day of the third month after the later of the date on which the Executive would have attained age 55 or the date of the Executive’s death.

 

(ii)                                   If an Executive is married on the date of his death and paragraph (b)(i) does not apply to him, then, the Executive’s surviving spouse shall receive the Non-Grandfathered Standard Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefit as follows:

 

(A)                                If the Executive Separated from Service before attaining age 55, the Executive’s spouse shall receive a reduced annuity payable monthly to the Executive’s spouse during his life, commencing on the first day of the third month following the later of the date on which the Executive would have attained age 55 or the date of the Executive’s death and ending on the date of the Executive’s spouse’s death, calculated as if the Executive Separated from Service on the earlier of the date of the Executive’s death or actual Separation from Service, elected a joint and 50% survivor annuity form of payment described in Section 3.3(2)(b)(ii), survived to age 55 and died on the date following the payment commencement date.

 

(B)                                If the Executive had attained age 55 while an Employee, the Executive’s spouse shall receive a reduced annuity payable monthly to the Executive’s spouse during his life, commencing on the first day of the of the third month after the date of the Executive’s death, calculated as if the Executive had died immediately after commencing payments in the form of an immediate joint and 100% survivor annuity form of payment described in Section 3,3(2)(b)(ii).

 

(C)                                Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the present value of the Non-Grandfathered Standard Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefit under this paragraph (b)(ii) does not exceed $25,000, such benefit will be distributed to the Executive’s Death Beneficiary in the form of an Actuarially Equivalent single lump sum on the first day of the third month following the later of the date on which the Executive would have attained age 55 or the date of the Executive’s death.

 

ARTICLE V
VESTING

 

Section 5.1                                     Vesting .

 

(1)                                  In General .  Except as provided in Subsection (2) and (3) of this Section, an Executive or Death Beneficiary shall become vested in the Mirror Pension Plan Benefits in accordance with the vesting provisions of the Pension Plan.

 

(2)                                  Forfeiture Provision .

 

(a)                                            Notwithstanding the provisions of Subsection (3) hereof, but subject to the requirements of paragraph (b) of this Subsection, the Employers shall be relieved of any obligation

 



 

to pay or provide any future Mirror Pension Benefits and Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefits under this Plan and shall be entitled to recover amounts already distributed if, without the written consent of the Company, the Executive, whether before or after termination with the Controlled Group (i) participates in dishonesty, fraud, misrepresentation, embezzlement or deliberate injury or attempted injury, in each case related to the Company or a Controlled Group member, (ii) commits any unlawful or criminal activity of a serious nature, (iii) commits any intentional and deliberate breach of a duty or duties that, individually or in the aggregate, are material in relation to the Executive’s overall duties or (iv) materially breaches any confidentiality or noncompete agreement entered into with the Company or a Controlled Group member.  The Employers shall have the burden of proving that one of the foregoing events has occurred.

 

(b)                                            Notwithstanding the foregoing, an Executive shall not forfeit any portion of his Mirror Pension Benefits or Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefits under paragraph (a) of this Subsection unless (i) the Executive receives reasonable notice in writing setting forth the grounds for the forfeiture, (ii) if requested by the Executive, the Executive (and/or the Executive’s counsel or other representative) is granted a hearing before the full Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) and (iii) a majority of the members of the full Board determine that the Executive violated one or more of the provisions of paragraph (a) of this Subsection.

 

(3)                                  Acceleration of Vesting .  Notwithstanding the provisions of Subsection (1) hereof, the Mirror Pension Benefits of the Executives (a) who are employed by the Controlled Group on the date of a Change in Control or (b) whose employment with the Company was terminated prior to a Change in Control but the Executive reasonably demonstrates that the termination occurred at the request of a third party who has taken steps reasonably calculated to effect the Change in Control, shall become immediately 100% vested upon the occurrence of such Change in Control.

 

ARTICLE VI
AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION

 

Section 6.1                                     Effect of Amendment and Termination .  Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan (including the Administrative Document) to the contrary, no amendment or termination of the Plan shall, without the consent of the Executive (or, in the case of his death, his Death Beneficiary), adversely affect the vested Mirror Pension Benefit or vested Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefit under the Plan of any Executive or Death Beneficiary as such Benefit exists on the date of such amendment or termination; provided, however, that this limitation shall not apply to the extent deemed necessary by the Company to comply with the requirements of the 409A Guidance.

 

Section 6.2                                     Limitation on Payments and Benefits .  Notwithstanding any provision of this Plan to the contrary, if any amount or benefit to be paid or provided under this Plan or any other plan or agreement between the Executive and a Controlled Group member would be an “Excess Parachute Payment,” within the meaning of Code Section 280G, or any successor provision thereto, but for the application of this sentence, then the payments and benefits to be paid or provided under this Plan shall be reduced to the minimum extent necessary (but in no event to less than zero) so that no portion of any such payment or benefit, as so reduced, constitutes an Excess Parachute Payment; provided, however, that the foregoing reduction shall be made only if and to the extent that such reduction would result in an increase in the aggregate payment and benefits to be provided to the Executive, determined on an after-tax basis (taking into account the excise tax imposed pursuant to Code Section 4999, or any successor provision thereto, any tax imposed by any comparable provision of state law, and any applicable federal, state and local income taxes).  If requested by the Executive or the Company, the determination of whether any reduction in such payments or benefits to be provided under this Plan or otherwise is required pursuant to the preceding sentence shall be made by the Company’s independent accountants, at the expense of the

 



 

Company, and the determination of the Company’s independent accountants shall be final and binding on all persons.  The fact that the Executive’s right to payments or benefits may be reduced by reason of the limitations contained in this Section 6.2 shall not of itself limit or otherwise affect any other rights of the Executive pursuant to this Plan.  The Executive’s benefit will be reduced only to the extent that the reduction in any cash payments due to the Executive and in the Executive’s SERP Benefits is insufficient to reduce or eliminate Excess Parachute Payment as described in this Section.  The Executive’s Non-Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefit (if any) shall be reduced if required by this section before any Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefit is reduced.

 

Section 6.3                                     Establishment of Trust Fund .

 

(1)                                  In General .  The Plan is intended to be an unfunded, non-qualified retirement plan.  However, the Company may enter into a trust agreement with a trustee to establish a trust fund (the “Trust Fund”) and to transfer assets thereto (or cause assets to be transferred thereto), subject to the claims of the creditors of the Employers, pursuant to which some or all of the Mirror Pension Benefits and Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefits shall be paid.  Payments from the Trust Fund shall discharge the Employers’ obligation to make payments under the Plan to the extent that Trust Fund assets are used to satisfy such obligations.

 

(2)                                  Upon a Change in Control .

 

(a)                                            Within thirty (30) business days of the occurrence of a Change in Control, to the extent it has not already done so, the Company shall be required to establish an irrevocable Trust Fund for the purpose of paying Mirror Pension Benefits and Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefits.  Except as described in the following sentence, all contributions to the Trust Fund shall be irrevocable and the Company shall not have the right to direct the trustee to return to the Employers, or divert to others, any of the  assets of the Trust Fund until after satisfaction of all liabilities to all of the Executives and their Death Beneficiaries under the Plan.  Any assets deposited in the Trust Fund shall be subject to the claims of the creditors of the Employers and any excess assets remaining in the Trust Fund after satisfaction of all liabilities shall revert to the Company.

 

(b)                                            In addition to the requirements described in paragraph (a) above, the Trust Fund which becomes effective on the Change in Control shall be subject to the following additional requirements:

 

(i)                                      the Trustee of the Trust Fund shall be a third party corporate or institutional trustee;

 

(ii)                                   the Trust Fund shall satisfy the requirements of a grantor trust under the Code; and

 

(iii)                                the Trust Fund shall automatically terminate (A) in the event that it is determined by a final decision of the United States Department of Labor (or, if an appeal is taken therefrom, by a court of competent jurisdiction) that by reason of the creation of, and a transfer of assets to, the Trust, the Trust is considered “funded” for purposes of Title I of ERISA or (B) in the event that it is determined by a final decision of the Internal Revenue Service (or, if an appeal is taken therefrom, by a court of competent jurisdiction) that (I) a transfer of assets to the Trust is considered a transfer of property for purposes of Code Section 83 or any successor provision thereto, or (II) pursuant to Code Section 451 or 409A or any

 



 

successor provision thereto, amounts are includable as compensation in the gross income of a Trust Fund beneficiary in a taxable year that is prior to the taxable year or years in which such amounts would otherwise be actually distributed or made available to such beneficiary by the trustee.  Upon such termination of the Trust, all of the assets in the Trust Fund attributable to the accrued Mirror Pension Plan Benefits shall be immediately distributed to the Executives, but only to the extent and in the manner permitted by the 409A Guidance, and the remaining assets, if any, shall revert to the Company.

 

(c)                                             Within five (5) days following establishment of the Trust Fund, the Company shall transfer (or cause the Employers to transfer) to the trustee of such Trust Fund an amount equal to the equivalent actuarial present value of the Mirror Pension Benefits and Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefits which have been accrued as of the date of the Change in Control on behalf of all of the Executives under the Plan (using the Actuarial Factors specified in Exhibit A for this purpose).

 

(d)                                            In January of each year following a funding of the Trust Fund pursuant to paragraph (c) above, the Company shall cause to be deposited in the Trust Fund such additional amount (if any) by which the aggregate equivalent actuarial present value (determined using the Actuarial Factors specified in Exhibit A) of the sum of the Mirror Pension Benefits and Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefits for all Executives under the Plan as of December 31 of the preceding year exceeds the fair market value of the assets of the Trust Fund as of such date.

 

(e)                                             Notwithstanding the foregoing, an Employer shall not be required to make any contributions to the Trust Fund if the Employer is insolvent at the time such contribution is required.

 

(f)                                              The Administrator shall notify the trustee of the amount of Mirror Pension Benefits and Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefits to be paid to or on behalf of the Executive from the Trust Fund and shall assist the trustee in making distribution thereof in accordance with the terms of the Plan.

 

(g)                                             Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan or the Administrative Document to the contrary, the provisions of this Section 6.3(2) hereof (i) may not be amended following a Change in Control and (ii) prior to a Change in Control may only be amended (A) with the written consent of each of the Executives or (B) if the effective date of such Amendment is at least two (2) years following the date the Executives were given written notice of the adoption of such amendment; provided, however, that this limitation shall not apply to any amendment that is deemed necessary or reasonable (as determined in the sole discretion of the Committee) to comply with the requirements of the 409A Guidance.

 



 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the Company has caused this instrument to be executed by its authorized officers and its corporate seal to be affixed, on the date written below.

 

Dated:  December 23, 2013

 

 

 

 

ECOLAB INC.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/Daniel J. Schmechel

 

 

 

Daniel J. Schmechel

 

 

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

(Seal)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attest:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/James J. Seifert

 

 

 

 

James J. Seifert

 

 

 

 

Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

 

 

 

 



 

EXHIBIT A

 

ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS
FOR STANDARD MIRROR PENSION BENEFITS
AND STANDARD MIRROR PRE-RETIREMENT PENSION BENEFITS

 

1.

Interest Rate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A.

For lump sum

 

The interest rate will be 125% of the 10-year Treasury rate for the month of October preceding the Plan Year (i.e., January 1) (1) in which the retirement or other termination of employment is effective if the Mirror Pension Benefit is to commence immediately following such retirement or termination of employment or (2) in which the distribution becomes payable if the payment is to be deferred.

 

 

 

 

 

 

B.

Annual Installments

 

Same as for lump sum.

 

 

 

 

 

 

C.

General Actuarial Equivalence

 

7.5% except as provided in item 4 below.

 

 

 

 

 

2.

Mortality:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A.

For Lump Sum

 

Revenue Ruling 2001-62 prescribed table. (The basis is the 1994 unisex pension tables)

 

 

 

 

 

 

B.

Annual Installments

 

Same as for lump sum.

 

 

 

 

 

 

C.

General Actuarial Equivalence

 

1971 Group Annuity Table

 

 

 

 

 

3.

Annuity Values Weighted:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A.

For Lump Sum

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

B.

Annual Installments

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

C.

General Actuarial Equivalence

 

75% male, 25% female

 

 

 

 

 

4.

Early Commencement

 

The Mirror Pension Benefit shall be reduced by one two hundred eightieth (1/280th) for each month that the date of the commencement of payment precedes the date on which the Executive will attain age sixty-two (62). If the Executive’s Ecolab Pension Plan benefit is affected by Section 415 of the Code, the Administrator shall make such further adjustments to the Mirror Pension Benefit as the Administrator, in his or her sole discretion, deems appropriate to ensure that the total early retirement benefit from the Ecolab Pension Plan and the Ecolab Mirror Pension Plan equals the early retirement benefit the Executive would have been entitled to under the Ecolab Pension Plan without regard to the Code Limitations and non-qualified deferrals.

 



 

 

 

 

If payment is in the form of a single lump sum, the lump sum amount shall be based on the lump sum interest rate defined in item 1 above, the mortality assumptions specified in items 2 and 3 above, and the “early retirement benefit” immediate annuity amount as determined under this item 4.

 

ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS
FOR CASH BALANCE MIRROR PENSION BENEFITS
AND CASH BALANCE MIRROR PRE-RETIREMENT PENSION BENEFITS

 

1.

Interest Rate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A.             Convert Retirement Account into an Annuity

 

The applicable interest rate(s), within the meaning of Code section 417(e), as specified by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for the second full calendar month preceding the first day of the Plan Year during which the distribution is made. (Used to determine an actuarially equivalent amount payable immediately as a single-life annuity benefit.)

 

 

 

 

 

B.             Convert Retirement Account into Annual Installments

 

The interest rate will be 125% of the 10-year Treasury rate for the month of October preceding the Plan Year (i.e., January 1) (1) in which the retirement or other termination of employment is effective if the Mirror Pension Benefit is to commence immediately following such retirement or termination of employment or (2) in which the distribution becomes payable if the payment is to be deferred.

 

 

 

 

 

C.             General Actuarial Equivalence

 

7.5%.

 

 

 

 

2.

Mortality:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A.             Convert Retirement Account into an Annuity

 

The applicable mortality table, within the meaning of Code section 417(e), in effect as of the date of distribution as prescribed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (described in section 807(d)(5)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code). (Used to determine an actuarially equivalent amount payable immediately as a single-life annuity benefit.)

 

 

 

 

 

B.             Convert Retirement Account into Annual Installments

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

C.             General Actuarial Equivalence

 

Revenue Ruling 2001-62 prescribed table. (The basis is the 1994 unisex pension tables.)

 



 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

Page

 

 

 

ARTICLE I PREFACE

2

 

 

 

Section 1.1

Effective Date

2

 

 

 

Section 1.2

Purpose of the Plan

2

 

 

 

Section 1.3

Administrative Document

2

 

 

 

Section 1.4

American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (AJCA)

2

 

 

 

ARTICLE II DEFINITIONS

3

 

 

 

Section 2.1

“Actuarial Equivalent” or “Actuarially Equivalent.”

3

 

 

 

Section 2.2

“Actuarial Factors”

3

 

 

 

Section 2.3

“Code Limitations”

3

 

 

 

Section 2.4

“Death Beneficiary”

3

 

 

 

Section 2.5

“Disability”

3

 

 

 

Section 2.6

“Executive”

3

 

 

 

Section 2.7

“Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefit”

4

 

 

 

Section 2.8

“Mirror Savings Plan”

4

 

 

 

Section 2.9

“Mirror Pension Benefit”

4

 

 

 

Section 2.10

“Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefit”

4

 

 

 

Section 2.11

“Non-Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefit”

4

 

 

 

Section 2.12

“Plan”

4

 

 

 

Section 2.13

“Separation from Service”

4

 

 

 

Section 2.14

“SERP”

4

 

 

 

Section 2.15

“SERP Benefit”

4

 

 

 

ARTICLE III MIRROR PENSION BENEFITS

5

 

 

 

Section 3.1

Amount of Mirror Pension Benefits

5

 

 

 

Section 3.2

Time of Payment

6

 

 

 

Section 3.3

Form of Payment of Mirror Pension Benefits

8

 

 

 

Section 3.4

Death after Commencement of Non-Grandfathered Mirror Pension Benefits

11

 

 

 

Section 3.5

Adjustment to Annual Installment Payments Commencing Prior to January 1, 2011

11

 

 

 

ARTICLE IV MIRROR PRE-RETIREMENT PENSION BENEFIT

11

 

 

 

Section 4.1

Eligibility

11

 

 

 

Section 4.2

Amount, Form and Timing of Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefits

12

 

i



 

ARTICLE V VESTING

13

 

 

 

Section 5.1

Vesting

13

 

 

 

ARTICLE VI AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION

14

 

 

 

Section 6.1

Effect of Amendment and Termination

14

 

 

 

Section 6.2

Limitation on Payments and Benefits

14

 

 

 

Section 6.3

Establishment of Trust Fund

15

 

ii


Exhibit (10.14)(ii)

 

AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO THE ECOLAB INC. ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENT

FOR NON-QUALIFIED BENEFIT PLANS

(As Amended and Restated effective as of January 1, 2011)

 

WHEREAS, Ecolab Inc. (the “Company”) has established and currently maintains the Ecolab Inc. Administrative Document for Non-Qualified Benefit Plans (As Amended and Restated effective as of January 1, 2011) (the “Administrative Document”); and

 

WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Administrative Document to reflect the addition of a non-qualified plan resulting from Ecolab’s acquisition of the plan’s sponsor, Permian Mud Service, LLC.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Section 5.1 of the Ecolab Inc. Administrative Document for Non-Qualified Benefit Plans, the Company hereby adopts this Amendment No. 1 to the Administrative Document effective as of January 1, 2013.

 

Section 1

 

1.                                       Section 1.3 of the Administrative Document is hereby amended by amending and restating such Section to read as follows:

 

Section 1.3  “ Benefit ” shall mean a Mirror Pension Benefit, a Mirror Pre-Retirement Pension Benefit, a SERP Benefit, a SERP Pre-Retirement Benefit, a Mirror Savings Benefit, an Executive Death Benefit, an Executive Disability Benefit, or a Deferred Compensation Plan Account benefit.

 

2.                                       Exhibit A of the Administrative Document is amended by adding the following to the end of the list contained in such exhibit:

 

6.  Permian Mud Service, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF , Ecolab, Inc. has executed this Amendment No. 1 this 23 rd   day of December, 2013.

 

 

 

ECOLAB INC.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/Daniel J. Schmechel

 

 

Name: Daniel J. Schmechel

 

 

Title: Chief Financial Officer, Ecolab Inc.

/s/James J. Seifert

 

 

Attest:

 

 

Name: James J. Seifert

 

 

Title: General Counsel and Secretary

 

 

 


Exhibit (13.1)

 

Management’s Discussion & Analysis

 

The following management discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) provides information that management believes is useful in understanding the operating results, cash flows and financial condition of Ecolab Inc. (“Ecolab”, “the company”, “we” or “our”). The discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial information and related notes included in this Annual Report and the unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of income for the twelve months ended December 31, 2011 and corresponding footnotes (the “2011 Merger Pro Formas”) included as a part of Exhibit 99.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 27, 2012. The 2011 Merger Pro Formas are incorporated herein by reference.

 

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). This discussion contains various “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” and various “Forward-Looking Statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We refer readers to the information on Non-GAAP Financial Measures, Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factors found on pages 29 and 30.

 

Comparability of Results

 

Fixed Currency Foreign Exchange Rates

 

We evaluate the performance of our international operations based on fixed currency exchange rates, which eliminate the impact of exchange rate fluctuations on our international operations. Fixed currency amounts are updated annually based on translation into U.S. dollars at foreign currency exchange rates established by management at the beginning of 2013, with all periods presented using such rates.

 

Impact of Acquisitions and Divestitures

 

On April 10, 2013, we completed our acquisition of privately held Champion Technologies and its related company Corsicana Technologies (collectively “Champion”). The business became part of our Global Energy reportable segment in the second quarter of 2013. The pro forma impact of the Champion acquisition was not material to our consolidated financial statements; therefore, pro forma information is not presented.

 

Our historical practice for providing growth rates adjusted for immaterial acquisitions and divestitures has generally been to exclude the results of the acquired business from the first twelve months post acquisition and exclude the results of the divested business from the twelve months prior to divestiture. Champion is an exception. Due to the rapid pace at which the business is being fully integrated within our Global Energy segment, including all customer selling activity, discrete financial data specific to the legacy Champion business is not readily available post acquisition. As such, to allow for the most meaningful period-over-period comparison, specific to the Champion transaction, Champion’s results for 2012 and the period prior to acquisition in 2013 have been included for purposes of providing acquisition adjusted growth rates. Throughout this MD&A, reference to “acquisition adjusted” growth rates follows the above methodology.

 

Reportable Segments

 

On December 1, 2011, Nalco Holding Company (“Nalco”) merged into a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ecolab Inc., creating the global leader in water, hygiene and energy technologies and services that provide and protect clean water, safe food, abundant energy and healthy environments.

 

Effective in the first quarter of 2013, we changed our reportable segments due to a change in our underlying organizational model designed to support the business following the Nalco merger and facilitate global growth. We did not operate under the realigned segment structure prior to 2013. As a result of the change, our new segment structure focuses on global businesses, with our ten operating units, which are also operating segments, aggregated into four reportable segments as follows:

 

· Global Industrial consists of the Global Water, Global Food & Beverage, Global Paper and Global Textile Care operating units.

· Global Institutional consists of the Global Institutional, Global Specialty and Global Healthcare operating units.

· Global Energy consists of the Global Energy operating unit.

· Other consists of the Global Pest Elimination and Equipment Care operating units.

 

For periods prior to its disposition in December 2012, the Vehicle Care operating unit was included within the Other reportable segment within the realigned reportable segment structure.

 

All segment comparisons and discussions, including against 2011 pro forma data as discussed further below, throughout this MD&A are based on the segment structure implemented in the first quarter of 2013.

 

During the third quarter of 2013, we made a change to the way we measure and report certain segments’ operating income, with intangible asset amortization specific to the Champion transaction moving to the Global Energy reportable segment from the Corporate segment. To provide meaningful comparisons, this change was made retroactively, resulting in $14.0 million of amortization expense moving to the Global Energy reportable segment from the Corporate segment for the second quarter of 2013. No other segments were impacted by this change.

 

2011 Pro Forma Information

 

Based on the December 1, 2011 completion of the Nalco merger, one month of legacy Nalco U.S. subsidiary activity was included in the consolidated Ecolab results during 2011. Consistent with our historical practice, International subsidiaries are included in the financial statements on the basis of their U.S. GAAP November 30 fiscal year-ends.

 

Because Nalco’s operations had such a significant impact on our operations, a comparison of our reported results for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 against our reported results for the twelve months ended December 31, 2011 is not entirely meaningful. In order to provide a meaningful comparison of our results of operations, where applicable (generally net sales through operating income), we have supplemented our historical financial data with discussion and analysis that compares reported and adjusted results for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 against the 2011 Merger Pro Formas.

 

The 2011 Merger Pro Formas are based on the historical consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes of both Ecolab and Nalco, and were prepared to illustrate the effects of our merger with Nalco, assuming the merger had been consummated on January 1, 2010.

 

The unaudited 2011 adjusted pro forma results exclude special (gains) and charges items that are unusual in nature and significant in amount. The exclusion of such items helps provide a better understanding of underlying business performance. The unaudited pro forma and adjusted pro forma results are not necessarily

 

11



 

indicative of the results of operations that would have actually occurred had the merger been completed as of the date indicated, nor are they indicative of future operating results of the combined company.

 

Reported data for both 2012 and 2011 and comparison against applicable unaudited pro forma data for 2011 included within this MD&A are shown in the following tables. Reconciliations of reported, pro forma, adjusted and pro forma adjusted amounts are provided on pages 16-21 of this MD&A.

 

Selected Statement of Income Data

 

 

 

REPORTED

 

REPORTED

 

PRO FORMA

 

MILLIONS

 

2012

 

2011

 

2011

 

Net sales

 

$

11,838.7

 

$

6,798.5

 

$

11,283.9

 

Cost of sales

 

6,483.5

 

3,475.6

 

6,126.4

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

3,920.2

 

2,438.1

 

3,920.6

 

Special (gains) and charges

 

145.7

 

131.0

 

(19.8)

 

Operating income

 

$

1,289.3

 

$

753.8

 

$

1,256.7

 

 

Special (Gains) and Charges

 

 

 

REPORTED

 

REPORTED

 

PRO FORMA

 

MILLIONS

 

2012

 

2011

 

2011

 

Net sales

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer agreement modification

 

$

– 

 

$

29.6

 

$

29.6

 

Cost of sales

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restructuring charges

 

22.7

 

5.3

 

5.3

 

Recognition of Nalco inventory fair value step-up

 

71.2

 

3.6

 

3.6

 

Subtotal

 

93.9

 

8.9

 

8.9

 

Special (gains) and charges

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restructuring charges

 

116.6

 

69.0

 

77.9

 

Champion acquisition costs

 

18.3

 

– 

 

– 

 

Nalco merger and integration costs

 

70.9

 

57.7

 

34.0

 

Gain on sales of businesses, litigation related charges and other

 

(60.1)

 

4.3

 

(131.7)

 

Subtotal

 

145.7

 

131.0

 

(19.8)

 

Total special (gains) and charges within operating expense

 

$

239.6

 

$

169.5

 

$

18.7

 

 

In order to provide the most meaningful 2011 results of operations for statement of income data below operating income, such results have been presented excluding the 2011 post merger Nalco activity.

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

Ecolab significantly outpaced continued mixed conditions in our global end markets to deliver very strong double-digit adjusted earnings growth in 2013. Importantly, we also continued to make key investments in growth drivers for the future and achieved another year of outstanding shareholder returns.

 

We realized solid fixed currency organic sales growth as our teams emphasized our innovative product and program strengths to help customers obtain better results and lower costs, and through these, we drove new account gains across our customer segments. We continued to implement appropriate price increases to help offset higher delivered product costs and investments in our business. We also leveraged cost efficiencies and merger and acquisition synergies to deliver the strong earnings gain.

 

Further strengthening our business, on April 10, 2013, we closed our acquisition of Champion, a Houston, Texas-based global energy specialty products and services company. Sales of the acquired business were approximately $1.3 billion in 2012.

 

Through these focused actions, we once again delivered outstanding results for our shareholders in 2013 while building opportunity for the future. Our performance underscored the strength and long term potential of our business, our people and our strategies.

 

Sales: Reported sales increased 12% to $13.3 billion in 2013 from $11.8 billion in 2012. Sales were negatively impacted by unfavorable foreign currency exchange compared to the prior year. When measured in fixed rates of foreign currency exchange, sales increased 13% compared to the prior year. The close of the Champion  transaction positively impacted sales growth in 2013, as acquisition adjusted fixed currency sales growth for 2013 was 5%. See the section entitled Non-GAAP Financial Measures on page 29 for further information on our Non-GAAP measures, the Net Sales table on page 16 and the Sales by Reportable Segment table on page 21.

 

Gross Margin: Our reported gross margin was 45.4% of sales for 2013, which compared against a 2012 reported gross margin of 45.2%. Excluding the impact of special (gains) and charges included in cost of sales from both 2013 and 2012, our 2013 adjusted gross margin was 45.7% and our 2012 adjusted gross margin was 46.0%. The net impact of acquisitions and divestitures negatively impacted our 2013 adjusted gross margin expansion by 0.5 percentage points. See the section entitled Non-GAAP Financial Measures on page 29 for further information on our Non-GAAP measures and the Gross Margin table on page 16.

 

Operating Income: Reported operating income increased 21% to $1.6 billion in 2013, compared to $1.3 billion in 2012. Non-GAAP adjusted operating income, excluding the impact of special (gains) and charges increased 16% in 2013. Foreign currency had a negative impact on operating income growth, as 2013 adjusted fixed currency operating income increased 17%. The net impact of acquisitions and divestitures added approximately 3 percentage points to our 2013 adjusted fixed currency growth rate. See the section entitled Non-GAAP Financial Measures on page 29 for further information on our Non-GAAP measures, the Operating Income table on page 19 and Operating Income by Reportable Segment table on page 24.

 

Earnings Per Share: Reported diluted earnings per share increased 34% to $3.16 in 2013 compared to $2.35 in 2012. Special (gains) and charges had a significant impact on both years, driven primarily by restructuring charges, Champion acquisition and integration costs and Nalco integration costs incurred in both 2013 and 2012, Venezuela currency devaluation charges in 2013 and the gain on sale of our Vehicle Care business and litigation related charges in 2012. Non-GAAP adjusted earnings per share, which exclude the impact of special (gains) and charges and discrete tax items from both 2013 and 2012 increased 19% to $3.54 in 2013 compared to $2.98 in 2012. See the section entitled Non-GAAP Financial Measures on page 29 for further information on our Non-GAAP measures, and the Diluted Earnings Per Common Share table on page 20.

 

Cash Flow: Cash flow from operating activities was $1.6 billion in 2013 compared to $1.2 billion in 2012. We continued to generate strong cash flow from operations, allowing us to fund our ongoing operations, acquisitions, investments in the business, debt repayments, pension obligations and return cash to our shareholders through share repurchases and dividend payments.

 

Balance Sheet: We remain committed to our stated objective of having an investment grade balance sheet, supported by our current rating of BBB+/Baa1 by the major ratings agencies. We expect to return to “A” range ratings metrics by the end of 2015. Our strong balance sheet has allowed us continued access to capital at attractive rates.

 

12



 

Dividends: We increased our quarterly cash dividend 20% in December 2013 to an indicated annual rate of $1.10 per share. The increase represents our 22nd consecutive annual dividend rate increase and the 77th consecutive year we have paid cash dividends. Our outstanding dividend history reflects our continued growth and development, strong cash flows, solid financial position and confidence in our business prospects for the years ahead.

 

Restructuring Initiatives: During the first quarter of 2013, we combined two previously separate restructuring plans originally initiated to individually improve our efficiency and effectiveness. The plan to sharpen the competitiveness of our European business and accelerate its growth and profitability was combined with the plan initiated following the completion of the Nalco merger to reduce our global workforce and optimize our supply chain and office facilities. Remaining actions under the combined plan are expected to be substantially completed in 2014.

 

Following the completion of the Champion acquisition, we commenced plans in April 2013 to undertake restructuring and other cost-savings actions to realize our acquisition related cost synergies as well as streamline and strengthen our position in the fast growing global energy market. We expect that restructuring actions related to the Champion acquisition will be completed by the end of 2015.

 

Champion Acquisition Integration: The integration of the Champion business into our Global Energy segment has progressed well and we are on or ahead of integration targets. Our field sales organization alignment, systems and facilities projects are on track with our plans. Synergy savings of $25 million for 2013 were on target and we have plans in place to deliver additional anticipated savings in 2014.

 

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

 

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. We have adopted various accounting policies to prepare the consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Our significant accounting policies are disclosed in Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Preparation of our consolidated financial statements, in conformity with U.S. GAAP, requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Estimates are considered to be critical if they meet both of the following criteria: (1) the estimate requires assumptions to be made about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the accounting estimate is made, and (2) different estimates that the company reasonably could have used for the accounting estimate in the current period, or changes in the accounting estimate that are reasonably likely to occur from period to period, have a material impact on the presentation of the company’s financial condition or results of operations.

 

Besides estimates that meet the “critical” estimate criteria, we make many other accounting estimates in preparing our financial statements and related disclosures. All estimates, whether or not deemed critical, affect reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues or expenses as well as disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. Estimates are based on experience and other information available prior to the issuance of the financial statements. Materially different results can occur as circumstances change and additional information becomes known, even from estimates not deemed critical. Our critical accounting estimates include the following:

 

Revenue Recognition

 

We recognize revenue on product sales at the time evidence of an arrangement exists, title to the product and risk of loss transfers to the customer, the price is fixed and determinable and collection is reasonably assured. We recognize revenue on services as they are performed. While we employ a sales and service team to ensure our customers’ needs are best met in a high quality way, the vast majority of our revenue is generated from product sales. Outside of the service businesses discussed in Note 17, any other services are either incidental to a product sale and not sold separately or are insignificant.

 

Our sales policies do not provide for general rights of return. We record estimated reductions to revenue for customer programs and incentive offerings including pricing arrangements, promotions and other volume-based incentives at the time the sale is recorded. We also record estimated reserves for anticipated uncollectible accounts and for product returns and credits at the time of sale. Depending on market conditions, we may increase customer incentive offerings, which could reduce gross profit margins at the time the incentive is offered.

 

Valuation Allowances and Accrued Liabilities

 

We estimate our allowance for doubtful accounts by analyzing accounts receivable balances by age and applying historical write-off and collection trend rates. In addition, our estimates also include separately providing for customer balances based on specific circumstances and credit conditions, and when it is deemed probable that the balance is uncollectible. We estimate our sales returns and allowances by analyzing historical returns and credits, and apply these trend rates to calculate estimated reserves for future credits. Actual results could differ from these estimates under different assumptions.

 

Our allowance for doubtful accounts balance was $81 million and $73 million, as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. These amounts include our allowance for sales returns and credits of $14 million and $13 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Our bad debt expense as a percent of net sales was 0.2%, 0.3% and 0.2% in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. We believe that it is reasonably likely that future results will be consistent with historical trends and experience. However, if the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an inability to make payments, or if unexpected events, economic downturns, or significant changes in future trends were to occur, additional allowances may be required.

 

Our business and operations are subject to extensive environmental laws and regulations governing, among other things, air emissions, wastewater discharges, the use and handling of hazardous substances, waste disposal and the investigation and remediation of soil and groundwater contamination. As with other companies engaged in similar manufacturing activities and providing similar services, some risk of environmental liability is inherent in our operations. Estimates used to record liabilities related to pending litigation and environmental claims are based on our best estimate of probable future costs. We record the amounts that represent the points in the range of estimates that we believe are most probable or the minimum amount when no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount. Potential insurance reimbursements generally are not anticipated in our accruals for environmental liabilities or other insured losses. Expected insurance proceeds are recorded as receivables when recovery is probable. While the final resolution of litigation and environmental contingencies could result in amounts different than current accruals, and therefore have an impact on our consolidated financial results in a future reporting period, we believe the ultimate outcome will not have a significant effect on our financial or liquidity position.

 

13



 

Actuarially Determined Liabilities

The measurement of our pension and postretirement benefit obligations are dependent on a variety of assumptions determined by management and used by our actuaries. These assumptions affect the amount and timing of future contributions and expenses.

 

The assumptions used in developing the required estimates include, among others, discount rate, projected salary and health care cost increases and expected return on assets. The discount rate assumptions for the U.S. plans are assessed using a yield curve constructed from a subset of bonds yielding greater than the median return from a population of non-callable, corporate bond issues rated Aa by Moody’s Investor Services or AA by Standard & Poors. The discount rate is calculated by matching the plans' projected cash flows to the bond yield curve. Projected salary and health care cost increases are based on our long-term actual experience, the near-term outlook and assumed inflation. The expected return on plan assets reflects asset allocations, investment strategies and views of investment advisors.

 

The effects of actual results differing from our assumptions, as well as changes in assumptions, are reflected in the unrecognized actuarial loss and amortized over future periods and, therefore, generally affect our recognized expense in future periods. Significant differences in actual experience or significant changes in assumptions may materially affect pension and other post-retirement obligations. The unrecognized actuarial loss on our U.S. qualified and non-qualified pension plans decreased during 2013 to $258 million from $769 million (both before tax) as of December 31, 2012, primarily due to an increase in our discount rate and actual asset returns being higher than the expected return on assets. The assumptions used to estimate our U.S. pension and postretirement obligations vary by plan. In determining our U.S. pension obligations for 2013, our discount rate increased to 4.92% from 4.14% at year-end 2012 and our weighted-average projected salary increase was 4.32% as of December 31, 2013 and 2012. In determining our U.S. postretirement health care obligation for 2013, our discount rate increased to 4.77% from 3.95% at year-end 2012. Our weighted-average expected return on U.S. plan assets, which reflects our expected long-term returns on plan assets used for determining 2013 and 2014 U.S. pension expense, was 8.25% and 7.75%, respectively. Our weighted-average expected return on plan assets used for determining 2013 and 2014 U.S. postretirement health care expense was 8.25% and 7.75%, respectively.

 

The effect on the December 31, 2013 funded status and 2014 expense of a decrease in the discount rate or expected return on assets assumption as of December 31, 2013 is shown below assuming no changes in benefit levels and no amortization of gains or losses for our major plans:

 

MILLIONS

 

EFFECT ON U.S. PENSION PLANS

 

ASSUMPTION

 

ASSUMPTION
CHANGE

 

INCREASE IN
RECORDED
OBLIGATION

 

HIGHER
2014
EXPENSE

 

Discount rate

 

-0.25 pts

 

$52.6

 

$4.7

 

Expected return on assets

 

-0.25 pts

 

N/A

 

$4.1

 

 

MILLIONS

 

EFFECT ON U.S. POSTRETIREMENT
HEALTH CARE BENEFITS PLANS

 

ASSUMPTION

 

ASSUMPTION
CHANGE

 

INCREASE IN
RECORDED
OBLIGATION

 

HIGHER
2014
EXPENSE

 

Discount rate

 

-0.25 pts

 

$6.6

 

$1.2

 

Expected return on assets

 

-0.25 pts

 

N/A

 

$0.1

 

 

Our international pension obligations and underlying plan assets represent approximately one third and one fourth, respectively, of our global pension plans, with the majority of the amounts held in the U.K. and Eurozone countries. We use similar assumptions to measure our international pension obligations. However, the assumptions used vary by country based on specific local country requirements and information.

 

See Note 16 for further discussion concerning our accounting policies, estimates, funded status, planned contributions and overall financial positions of our pension and postretirement plan obligations.

 

Globally we have high deductible insurance policies for property and casualty losses. We are insured for losses in excess of these deductibles and have recorded both a liability and an offsetting receivable for amounts in excess of these deductibles. We are self-insured for health care claims for eligible participating employees, subject to certain deductibles and limitations. We determine our liabilities for claims on an actuarial basis. A change in these assumptions would cause reported results to differ.

 

Restructuring

We incur net costs for restructuring activities associated with plans to enhance our efficiency and effectiveness and sharpen the competitiveness of our businesses. These restructuring plans include costs associated with significant actions involving employee-related severance charges, contract termination costs and asset write-downs and disposals. Employee termination costs are largely based on policies and severance plans, and include personnel reductions and related costs for severance, benefits and outplacement services. These charges are reflected in the quarter in which the actions are probable and the amounts are estimable, which is generally when management approves the associated actions. Contract termination costs include charges to terminate leases prior to the end of their respective terms and other contract termination costs. Asset write-downs and disposals include leasehold improvement write-downs, other asset write-downs associated with combining operations and disposal of assets.

 

Restructuring charges have been included as a component of both cost of sales and special (gains) and charges on the Consolidated Statement of Income. Amounts included as a component of cost of sales include supply chain and other asset write-downs associated with combining operations. Restructuring liabilities have been classified as a component of both other current and other noncurrent liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. We expect to incur a total of $180 in charges for our two active restructuring plans (Combined and Energy) from 2013 to 2015 of which $91 million was incurred in 2013. Our restructuring liability balance was $81 million and $117 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respctively. For additional information on our current restructuring activities, see Note 3.

 

Income Taxes

Judgment is required to determine the annual effective income tax rate, deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowances recorded against net deferred tax assets. Our effective income tax rate is based on annual income, statutory tax rates and tax planning available in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. Our annual effective income tax rate includes the impact of reserve provisions. We recognize the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement with a taxing authority. We adjust these reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances. During interim periods, this expected annual rate is then applied to our year-to-date operating results. In the

 

14



 

event that there is a significant discrete item recognized in our interim operating results, the tax attributable to that item would be separately calculated and recorded in the same period.

 

Tax regulations require items to be included in our tax returns at different times than the items are reflected in our financial statements. As a result, the effective income tax rate reflected in our financial statements differs from that reported in our tax returns. Some of these differences are permanent, such as expenses that are not deductible on our tax return, and some are temporary differences, such as depreciation expense.

 

Temporary differences create deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets generally represent items that can be used as a tax deduction or credit in our tax return in future years for which we have already recorded the tax benefit in our income statement. We establish valuation allowances for our deferred tax assets when the amount of expected future taxable income is not likely to support the utilization of the entire deduction or credit. Relevant factors in determining the realizability of deferred tax assets include historical results, future taxable income, the expected timing of the reversal of temporary differences, tax planning strategies and the expiration dates of the various tax attributes. Deferred tax liabilities generally represent items for which we have already taken a deduction in our tax return, but have not yet recognized that tax benefit in our financial statements.

 

U.S. deferred income taxes are not provided on certain unremitted foreign earnings that are considered permanently reinvested. Undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries are considered to have been reinvested indefinitely or are available for distribution with foreign tax credits available to offset the amount of applicable income tax and foreign withholding taxes that might be payable on earnings. It is impractical to determine the amount of incremental taxes on an ongoing basis that might arise if all undistributed earnings were distributed.

 

A number of years may elapse before a particular tax matter, for which we have established a reserve, is audited and finally resolved. The number of tax years with open tax audits varies depending on the tax jurisdiction. The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) has completed its examinations of our federal income tax returns through 2010. Our Ecolab U.S. (including Nalco) income tax returns for the years 2011 and 2012 are currently under audit. The legacy Champion U.S. income tax return for the year 2011 is currently under audit. In addition to the U.S. federal examinations, we have ongoing audit activity in several U.S. state and foreign jurisdictions.

 

The tax positions we take are based on our interpretations of tax laws and regulations in the applicable federal, state and international jurisdictions. We believe that our tax returns properly reflect the tax consequences of our operations, and that our reserves for tax contingencies are appropriate and sufficient for the positions taken. Because of the uncertainty of the final outcome of these examinations, we have reserved for potential reductions of tax benefits (including related interest and penalties) for amounts that do not meet the more-likely-than-not thresholds for recognition and measurement as required by authoritative guidance. The tax reserves are reviewed throughout the year, taking into account new legislation, regulations, case law and audit results. Settlement of any particular issue could result in offsets to other balance sheet accounts, cash payments or receipts and/or adjustments to tax expense. The majority of our tax reserves are presented in the balance sheet within other non-current liabilities. Our gross liability for uncertain tax positions was $99 million and $93 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. For additional information on income taxes, see Note 12.

 

Long-Lived, Intangible Assets and Goodwill

We periodically review our long-lived and amortizable intangible assets, the total value of which was $6.8 billion and $5.5 billion as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, for impairment and assess whether significant events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. Such circumstances may include a significant decrease in the market price of an asset, a significant adverse change in the manner in which the asset is being used or in its physical condition or history of operating or cash flow losses associated with the use of the asset. Impairment losses could occur when the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the anticipated future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. The amount of the impairment loss to be recorded, if any, is calculated as the excess of the asset’s carrying value over its estimated fair value. In addition, we periodically reassess the estimated remaining useful lives of our long-lived assets. Changes to estimated useful lives would impact the amount of depreciation and amortization expense recorded in earnings. We have experienced no significant changes in the carrying value or estimated remaining useful lives of our long-lived or amortizable intangible assets.

 

As part of the Nalco merger, we added the “Nalco” trade name as an indefinite life intangible asset, the total value of which was $1.2 billion as of December 31, 2013 and 2012. The carrying value of the indefinite life trade name was subject to annual impairment testing, using the qualitative assessment method, during the second quarter of 2013. Based on this testing, no adjustment to the carrying value was necessary. Additionally, based on the ongoing performance of our operating units, updating the impairment testing during the second half of 2013 was not deemed necessary.

 

We had total goodwill of $6.9 billion and $5.9 billion as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. We test our goodwill for impairment on an annual basis during the second quarter. Our reporting units are our operating segments.

 

We used a “step zero” qualitative test to assess eight of our ten reporting units. Qualitative testing evaluated factors including, but not limited to, economic, market and industry conditions, cost factors and the overall financial performance of the reporting unit. The estimated fair values for seven of the eight reporting units using “step zero” substantially exceeded their respective carrying values. While Global Energy had approximately 30% headroom due to the recent acquisition of Champion, we considered “step zero” analysis to be sufficient due to continued strong qualitative indicators. Global Energy’s headroom before the Champion acquisition continued to increase since the prior year assessment. Based on our “step zero” analysis performed, we noted no changes in events or circumstances which would have required us to complete the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment analysis for any of the assessed reporting units.

 

We elected to utilize a “step one” quantitative test for Global Water and Global Paper given the lower headroom between fair value and carrying value at the previous year’s annual impairment test. These reporting units had lower headroom as they were acquired as part of the Nalco merger in December 2011. “Step one” quantitative testing requires judgment and often involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. Fair values of reporting units are established using a discounted cash flow method. Where available and as appropriate, comparable market multiples are used to corroborate the results of the discounted cash flow method. These valuation methodologies use estimates and assumptions, which include projected future cash flows (including timing), discount rates reflecting the risk inherent in future cash flows, perpetual growth rates, and determination of appropriate market comparables. The headroom for these reporting

 

15



 

units has continued to increase since the prior year assessment. Based on the “step one” testing performed, no impairment of goodwill was indicated, and the fair value for both reporting units now substantially exceeds their respective carrying values.

 

If circumstances change significantly, we would also test a reporting unit for impairment during interim periods between the annual tests. Additionally, based on the current performance of our reporting units, updating the impairment testing during the second half of 2013 was not deemed necessary.

 

The Nalco and Champion transactions resulted in the addition of $4.5 billion and $1.0 billion of goodwill, respectively. Subsequent performance of the reporting units holding the additional goodwill relative to projections used in our purchase price allocation could result in impairment if there is either underperformance by the reporting unit or if the carrying value of the reporting unit were to fluctuate significantly due to reasons that did not proportionately increase fair value.

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Net Sales

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PERCENT CHANGE

 

MILLIONS

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reported GAAP net sales

 

 

$

13,253.4

 

 

$

11,838.7

 

$

6,798.5

 

 

12

%

 

74

%

 

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nalco merger pro forma adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

4,485.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales

 

 

13,253.4

 

 

11,838.7

 

11,283.9

*

 

12

 

 

5

 

 

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Special (gains) and charges

 

 

 

 

 

29.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-GAAP adjusted sales

 

 

13,253.4

 

 

11,838.7

 

11,313.5

*

 

12

 

 

5

 

 

Effect of foreign currency translation

 

 

102.0

 

 

(1.6

)

(254.6

)*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-GAAP adjusted fixed currency sales

 

 

$

13,355.4

 

 

$

11,837.1

 

$

11,058.9

*

 

13

%

 

7

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*Amounts represent the 2011 pro forma equivalent to the 2013 and 2012 amounts presented.

 

Reported sales for 2013 increased 12%, with growth benefiting from the inclusion of the Champion business in our results beginning in the second quarter of 2013. Foreign currency negatively impacted sales growth in 2013. Acquisition adjusted fixed currency sales increased 5% when comparing 2013 against 2012.

 

The increase in reported sales for 2012 is due primarily to the inclusion of the Nalco business in our results. Reported sales for 2012 increased 5% when compared to both 2011 pro forma sales and 2011 adjusted pro forma sales. Foreign currency negatively impacted sales growth in 2012.

 

The percentage change components of the year-over-year 2013 sales increase and the year-over-year 2012 reported net sales versus 2011 adjusted pro forma sales increase are as follows:

 

PERCENT

 

2013

2012

 

 

 

 

Volume

 

4

%

5

%

Price changes

 

1

 

2

 

Acquisition adjusted fixed currency sales increase

 

5

 

7

 

Acquistions & divestitures

 

8

 

 

Non-GAAP adjusted fixed currency sales increase

 

13

 

7

 

Foreign currency translation

 

(1

)

(2

)

Sales increase

 

12

%

5

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of Sales (COS) and Gross Margin

 

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

MILLIONS/PERCENT

 

 

COS

 

GROSS
MARGIN

 

COS

 

GROSS
MARGIN

 

COS

 

GROSS
MARGIN

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reported GAAP

 

 

$

7,240.1

 

45.4

%

 

 

$

6,483.5

 

45.2

%

 

$

 3,475.6

 

48.9

%

 

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nalco merger pro forma adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,650.8

 

(3.2

)

 

Subtotal

 

 

7,240.1

 

45.4

 

 

 

6,483.5

 

45.2

 

 

6,126.4

*

45.7

*

 

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Special (gains) and charges

 

 

43.2

 

0.3

 

 

 

93.9

 

0.8

 

 

8.9

 

0.2

 

 

Non-GAAP adjusted gross margin

 

 

$

7,196.9

 

45.7

%

 

 

$

6,389.6

 

46.0

%

 

$

6,117.5

*

45.9

%*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*Amounts represent the 2011 pro forma equivalent to the 2013 and 2012 amounts presented.

 

Our cost of sales (“COS”) values and corresponding gross profit margin (“gross margin”) are shown in the previous table. Our gross margin is defined as sales less cost of sales divided by sales.

 

Our reported gross margin was 45.4% and 45.2% for 2013 and 2012, respectively. Our 2013 and 2012 reported gross margins were negatively impacted by special (gains) and charges including the recognition of fair value step-up in Champion inventory of $36.6 million and restructuring charges of $6.6 million during 2013 and the recognition of fair value step-up in Nalco inventory of $71.2 million and restructuring charges of $22.7 million during 2012.

 

Excluding the impact of these items, our 2013 adjusted gross margin of 45.7% compared against a 2012 adjusted gross margin of 46.0%. The decrease was impacted primarily by growth within Global Energy, including the impact of the Champion acquisition, which on average has a lower gross margin compared to our other businesses, as well as increased delivered product costs (including raw materials, freight and fuel).

 

16



 

These negative impacts were partially offset by pricing gains, sales volume increases, synergies and cost savings. The net impact of acquisitions and divestitures negatively impacted our 2013 adjusted gross margin expansion by 0.5 percentage points.

 

Our reported gross margin was 45.2% and 48.9% for 2012 and 2011, respectively. The inclusion of Nalco’s business mix in 2012 negatively impacted our 2012 reported gross margin when comparing against our reported 2011 gross margin. Our 2012 reported gross margin was also negatively impacted by special (gains) and charges as discussed above. Our 2011 gross margin was negatively impacted by $29.6 million related to the modification of a customer agreement, restructuring charges of $5.3 million and recognition of fair value step-up in Nalco inventory of $3.6 million.

 

Excluding the impact of restructuring charges and the recognition of fair value step-up inventory from 2012 and 2011 results, the impact of the customer agreement modification from our 2011 results, and adjusting 2011 for the pro forma effect of the Nalco merger, our 2012 adjusted gross margin was 46.0%, which compared against an adjusted pro forma gross margin of 45.9% for 2011. The increase in the 2012 adjusted gross margin as compared to the 2011 adjusted pro forma gross margin was driven by pricing gains, sales volume increases, synergies and cost savings which outpaced increased delivered product costs as well as the negative business mix impact of increased Global Energy sales.

 

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

 

PERCENT

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reported SG&A ratio

 

32.3

%

 

33.1

%

 

35.9

%

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nalco merger pro forma adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

(1.2

)

SG&A ratio

 

32.3

%

 

33.1

%

 

34.7

%*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*Amounts represent the 2011 pro forma equivalent to the 2013 and 2012 amounts presented.

 

Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses as a percentage of sales decreased to 32.3% compared to 33.1% in 2012. The decrease in SG&A ratio to sales during 2013 was driven by leverage from sales gains, synergies and cost savings, which more than offset investments and other cost increases. We continued to make key business investments that drive innovation and efficiency, through R&D and information technology systems. The net impact of acquisitions and divestitures on our SG&A ratio was minimal.

 

Reported SG&A expenses as a percentage of reported sales were 33.1% during 2012 compared to the reported equivalent of 35.9% in 2011. The inclusion of Nalco's business mix in 2012 positively impacted our 2012 reported SG&A expense ratio when comparing against our reported 2011 SG&A expense ratio.

 

Adjusting 2011 results for the pro forma effect of the Nalco merger, our reported 2012 SG&A expense ratio of 33.1% compared against a 2011 pro forma SG&A expense ratio of 34.7%. The decrease in expense percentage during 2012 was driven by leverage from sales gains, synergies and cost savings efforts including those associated with restructuring actions, which more than offset investments and other cost increases.

 

Special (Gains) and Charges

 

Special (gains) and charges reported on the Consolidated Statement of Income included the following items:

 

MILLIONS

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer agreement modification

 

$

 

 

$

 —

 

 

$

 29.6

 

Cost of sales

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restructuring charges

 

6.6

 

 

22.7

 

 

5.3

 

Recognition of Champion inventory fair value step-up

 

36.6

 

 

 

 

 

Recognition of Nalco inventory fair value step-up

 

 

 

71.2

 

 

3.6

 

Subtotal

 

43.2

 

 

93.9

 

 

8.9

 

Special (gains) and charges

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restructuring charges

 

83.4

 

 

116.6

 

 

69.0

 

Champion acquisition and integration costs

 

49.7

 

 

18.3

 

 

 

Nalco merger and integration costs

 

18.6

 

 

70.9

 

 

57.7

 

Venezuela currency devaluation

 

23.2

 

 

 

 

 

Gain on sale of businesses, litigation related charges and other

 

(3.6

)

 

(60.1

)

 

4.3

 

Subtotal

 

171.3

 

 

145.7

 

 

131.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating income subtotal

 

214.5

 

 

239.6

 

 

169.5

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition debt costs

 

2.5

 

 

1.1

 

 

1.5

 

Debt extinguishment costs

 

 

 

18.2

 

 

 

Subtotal

 

2.5

 

 

19.3

 

 

1.5

 

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Venezuela currency devaluation

 

(0.5

)

 

 

 

 

Recognition of Nalco inventory fair value step-up

 

 

 

(4.5

)

 

 

Subtotal

 

(0.5

)

 

(4.5

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total special (gains) and charges

 

$

216.5

 

 

$

254.4

 

 

$

 171.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For segment reporting purposes, special (gains) and charges have been included in our corporate segment, which is consistent with our internal management reporting.

 

Restructuring Charges

 

Energy Restructuring Plan

 

In April 2013, following the completion of the acquisition of Champion, we commenced plans to undertake restructuring and other cost-saving actions to realize our acquisition related cost synergies as well as streamline and strengthen our position in the fast growing global energy market (the “Energy Restructuring Plan”). Actions associated with the acquisition to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the business include a reduction of the combined business’s current global workforce by approximately 500 positions. A number of these reductions are expected to be achieved through eliminating open positions and attrition. We also anticipate leveraging and simplifying our global supply chain, including the reduction of plant and distribution center locations and product line optimization, as well as the reduction of other redundant facilities.

 

The pre-tax restructuring charges under the Energy Restructuring Plan are expected to be approximately $80 million ($55 million after tax). The restructuring is expected to be completed by the end of 2015. We anticipate that approximately $60 million of the $80 million pre-tax charges will represent cash expenditures. The remaining pre-tax charges represent estimated asset write-downs and disposals. No decisions have been made for any remaining asset

 

17



 

disposals and estimates could vary depending on the actual actions taken.

 

As a result of activities under the Energy Restructuring Plan, we recorded restructuring charges of $27.4 million ($19.4 million after tax) or $0.06 per diluted share during 2013. We anticipate that we will incur approximately $40 million ($28 million after tax) of restructuring charges in 2014. Cash payments under the Energy Restructuring Plan during 2013 were $17.5 million. The majority of cash payments under this Plan are related to severance, with the current accrual expected to be paid over the next twelve months. Cash payments in 2014 are anticipated to increase slightly in comparision to 2013. We anticipate the remaining cash expenditures will be funded from operating activities.

 

Cumulative savings achieved under the Energy Restructuring Plan during 2013 were approximately $25 million. We anticipate cumulative cost savings from this Plan, along with synergies achieved in connection with the acquisition, of $80 million in 2014, with annual cost savings and synergies of $150 million by the end of 2015.

 

Combined Restructuring Plan

 

In February 2011, we commenced a comprehensive plan to substantially improve the efficiency and effectiveness of our European business, sharpen its competitiveness and accelerate its growth and profitability. Additionally, restructuring has been and will continue to be undertaken outside of Europe (collectively, the “2011 Restructuring Plan”). Total anticipated charges from this Plan from 2011 through 2013 were expected to be $150 million ($125 million after tax), with expected annualized cost savings of approximately $120 million ($100 million after tax) when fully realized. Through 2012, $134 million of charges ($100 million after tax) or $0.37 per diluted share were incurred, and cumulative cost savings were approximately $70 million.

 

In January 2012, following the merger with Nalco, we formally commenced plans to undertake restructuring actions related to the reduction of our global workforce and optimization of our supply chain and office facilities, including planned reductions of plant and distribution center locations (the “Merger Restructuring Plan”). Total anticipated charges from 2012 through 2013 were expected to be $180 million ($120 million after tax) under this Plan with expected annual pre-tax cost savings, along with cost synergies in connection with the merger, of approximately $250 million when fully realized. Through 2012, $80 million of charges ($59 million after tax), or $0.20 per diluted share were incurred, and cumulative cost savings were approximately $75 million.

 

During the first quarter of 2013, as we considered opportunities to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of our operations, we determined that because the objectives of the plans discussed above were aligned, the previously separate restructuring plans should be combined into one plan.

 

The combined restructuring plan (the “Combined Plan”) combines opportunities and initiatives from both plans and continues to follow the original format of the Merger Restructuring Plan by focusing on global actions related to optimization of the supply chain and office facilities, including reductions of plant and distribution center locations and the global workforce. After combining the plans and through the completion of the Combined Plan, we expect to incur total restructuring charges of approximately $100 million ($70 million after tax), of which $63.6 million ($48.3 million after tax) or $0.16 per diluted share was incurred in 2013, with the remaining expected to be substantially incurred in 2014.

 

We anticipate that substantially all of the remaining Combined Plan pre-tax charges will represent net cash expenditures.

 

Net cash payments under the Combined Plan were $101.8 million, $65.3 million and $25.1 million for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The majority of cash payments under the Combined Plan are related to severance, with the current accrual expected to be paid over a period of a few months to several quarters. Cash payments are expected to continue at a consistent level with 2013 through the end of 2014, and subsequently are expected to progressively decline. We anticipate the remaining cash expenditures will continue to be funded from operating activities.

 

During 2013, the Combined Plan achieved approximately $110 million of savings as compared to 2012. We anticipate cumulative cost savings and synergies from the Combined Plan of at least $320 million in 2014. The 2013 realized savings and 2014 expected savings are consistent with the original goals established under the previously separate plans, of at least $135 million in 2013 and $250 million on an annual basis with the run rate achieved by the end of 2014 under the original Merger Restructuring Plan and of approximately $120 million of annual cost savings by the end of 2014, primarily within the European operations under the original 2011 Restructuring Plan. The European savings are expected to be enhanced by synergies within the Merger Restructuring Plan associated with combining the legacy Ecolab European business with the additional European operations acquired with the Nalco merger.

 

Restructuring charges have been included as a component of both cost of sales and special (gains) and charges on the Consolidated Statement of Income. Further details related to our restructuring charges are included in Note 3.

 

Non-restructuring special (gains) and charges

 

Champion acquisition and integration costs

 

As a result of our efforts to acquire Champion and the resulting post acquisition integration costs we incurred charges of $88.8 million ($61.4 million after tax) or $0.20 per diluted share and $19.4 million ($16.7 million) or $0.06 per diluted share, during 2013 and 2012, respectively.

 

Champion acquisition and integration related costs have been included as a component of cost of sales, special (gains) and charges and net interest expense on the Consolidated Statement of Income. Amounts within cost of sales include the recognition of fair value step-up in Champion international inventory, which is maintained on a FIFO basis, and Champion U.S. inventory which is associated with the adoption of LIFO and integration into an existing LIFO pool. Amounts included in special (gains) and charges include acquisition costs, advisory and legal fees and integration charges. Amounts included in net interest expense include the interest expense through the April 2013 close date of the Champion transaction of the company’s $500 million public debt issuance in December 2012 as well as fees to secure term loans and short-term debt, all of which were initiated to fund the Champion acquisition.

 

Nalco merger and integration costs

 

As a result of the Nalco merger completed in 2011 we incurred charges of $18.6 million ($14.2 million after tax), or $0.05 per diluted share, $155.8 million ($113.7 million after tax), or $0.38 per diluted share and $62.8 million ($45.6 million after tax), or $0.19 per diluted share, during 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

 

Nalco merger and integration charges have been included as a component of cost of sales, special (gains) and charges, net interest expense and net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest on the Consolidated Statement of Income. Amounts included in cost

 

18



 

of sales and net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest include recognition of fair value step-up in Nalco international inventory which is maintained on a FIFO basis. Amounts included in special (gains) and charges include merger and integration charges, closing costs and advisory fees. Amounts included in net interest expense include a loss on the extinguishment of Nalco’s senior notes, which were assumed as part of the merger, and fees to secure short-term credit facilities to initially fund the Nalco merger.

 

Venezuelan currency devaluation

 

On February 8, 2013, the Venezuelan government devalued its currency, the Bolivar Fuerte. As a result of the devaluation, in 2013, we recorded a charge of $22.7 million ($16.1 million after tax) or $0.05 per diluted share, due to the remeasurement of the local balance sheet. As a result of the ownership structure in place in Venezuela, we also reflected the impact of the devaluation as a component of net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest on the Consolidated Statement of Income.

 

Other special (gains) and charges

 

During 2012, we recorded a net gain of $60.1 million ($35.7 million after tax), or $0.12 per diluted share, related to the sale of our Vehicle Care division, the receipt of additional payments related to the sale of an investment in a U.S. business originally sold prior to 2012 and litigation related charges.

 

In the fourth quarter of 2011, we modified a long-term customer agreement that was assumed as part of a previous acquisition. The impact of the modification was included in net sales on the Consolidated Statement of Income, resulting in a sales reduction of $29.6 million ($18.4 million after tax), or $0.08 per diluted share.

 

In the first quarter of 2011, we completed the purchase of the assets of the Cleantec business of Campbell Brothers Ltd., Brisbane, Queensland, Australia (“Cleantec”). Special (gains) and charges in 2011 included acquisition integration costs incurred to optimize the Cleantec business structure.

 

As shown in the pro forma table on page 12, pro forma 2011 special (gains) and charges include the impact of the sale of Nalco’s personal care products business and its marine chemicals business, which resulted in a gain of $136.0 million.

 

Further details related to our non-restructuring special (gains) and charges are included in Note 3.

 

Operating Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PERCENT CHANGE

 

MILLIONS

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reported GAAP operating income

 

 

$

1,560.6

 

 

$

1,289.3

 

$

753.8

 

 

21

%

 

71

%

 

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nalco merger pro forma adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

502.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating income

 

 

1,560.6

 

 

1,289.3

 

1,256.7

*

 

21

 

 

3

 

 

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Special (gains) and charges

 

 

214.5

 

 

239.6

 

18.7

*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-GAAP adjusted operating income

 

 

1,775.1

 

 

1,528.9

 

1,275.4

*

 

16

 

 

20

 

 

Effect of foreign currency translation

 

 

19.6

 

 

2.3

 

(21.6

)*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-GAAP adjusted fixed currency operating income

 

 

$

1,794.7

 

 

$

1,531.2

 

$

1,253.8

*

 

17

%

 

22

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*Amounts represent the 2011 pro forma equivalent to the 2013 and 2012 amounts presented.

 

Reported operating income in 2013 increased 21% compared to 2012. Our reported operating income for both 2013 and 2012 was impacted by special (gains) and charges. Excluding the impact of special (gains) and charges from 2013 and 2012 reported results, 2013 adjusted operating income increased 16% when compared to 2012 adjusted operating income. Foreign currency had a negative impact on operating growth. The 2013 adjusted fixed currency operating income increase of 17% was driven by pricing, sales volume gains, synergies, cost savings and the net impact of acquisitions. Partially offsetting this was investments in the business, a lower gross margin, impacted by growth in Global Energy and higher delivered product costs. The net impact of acquisitions and divestitures added approximately 3 percentage points to the 2013 adjusted fixed currency growth rate shown in the table above.

 

Reported operating income in 2012 increased 71% compared to reported operating income in 2011. Reported operating income in 2012 increased 3% against 2011 pro forma operating income. Our 2012 reported operating income and 2011 pro forma operating income were both impacted by special (gains) and charges. Excluding the impact of special (gains) and charges from 2012 reported and 2011 pro forma operating income, 2012 adjusted operating income increased 20% when compared against 2011 adjusted pro forma operating income. Foreign currency had a negative impact on operating income growth. The 2012 adjusted fixed currency operating income increase of 22% as compared to 2011 adjusted pro forma fixed currency operating income was driven by sales volume and pricing gains, as well as synergies and other cost savings, which more than offset higher delivered product costs and investments in the business.

 

Interest Expense, Net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PERCENT CHANGE

MILLIONS

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

2013

 

2012

Reported GAAP interest expense, net

 

 

$

262.3

 

$

276.7

 

$

74.2

 

 

(5

)%

 

273

%

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Special (gains) and charges

 

 

2.5

 

19.3

 

1.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nalco merger impact

 

 

 

 

17.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-GAAP adjusted interest expense, net

 

 

$

259.8

 

$

257.4

 

$

55.3

 

 

1

%

 

365

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19



 

Reported net interest expense totaled $262.3 million, $276.7 million and $74.2 million during 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

 

Special (gains) and charges reported within net interest expense impacted all three years presented. Special (gains) and charges within net interest during 2013 and 2012 included the interest expense through the April 2013 close date of the Champion acquisition of our $500 million public debt issuance in December 2012, as well as fees to secure term loans and short-term debt, all of which were initiated to fund the Champion acquisition. Special (gains) and charges within net interest during 2012 also included a net loss on the extinguishment of Nalco’s senior notes, which were assumed as part of the merger. Special (gains) and charges reported within net interest expense during 2011 included short-term credit facility costs incurred to initially finance the Nalco merger.

 

The increase in our 2013 adjusted net interest expense compared to our 2012 adjusted net interest expense was due primarily to interest associated with debt issued in connection with the Champion acquisition, offset by decreased borrowings across our international operations, lower U.S. commercial paper borrowings and legacy Nalco debt extinguishments in early 2012.

 

Both reported and adjusted net interest expense increased from 2011 to 2012, due primarily to debt issued to fund the cash portion of the Nalco merger consideration, the repayment of Nalco debt and share repurchases.

 

Provision for Income Taxes

The following table provides a summary of our tax rate:

 

PERCENT

 

2013

2012

2011

Reported tax rate

 

25.0

%

30.7

%

31.8

%

Tax rate impact of:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Special gains and charges

 

0.4

 

(1.5

)

(0.9

)

Discrete tax items

 

2.7

 

0.7

 

(1.0

)

Nalco merger impact

 

 

 

0.0

 

Non-GAAP adjusted tax rate

 

28.1

%

29.9

%

29.9

%

 

Our reported tax rate for 2013, 2012 and 2011 includes the tax impact of special gains and charges and discrete tax items. Depending on the nature of our special gains and charges and discrete tax items, our reported tax rate may not be consistent on a period to period basis, as amounts included in our special gains and charges are derived from tax jurisdictions with rates that vary from our overall non-GAAP adjusted tax rate. Additionally, our 2011 reported tax rate includes the impact of including Nalco’s U.S. activity in our consolidated results beginning in December 2011.

 

Our 2013 reported tax rate includes $60.1 million of net tax benefits on special gains and charges and $41.7 million of discrete tax net benefits. Our 2012 reported tax rate includes $59.4 million of net tax benefits on special gains and charges and $9.2 million of discrete tax net benefits. Our 2011 reported tax rate includes $45.4 million of net tax benefits on special gains and charges, $1.5 million of tax benefits related to U.S. Nalco activity included in our consolidated results beginning in December 2011, and $7.4 million of discrete tax net expense. The corresponding impact of these items to the reported tax rate is shown in the previous table.

 

Discrete tax net benefits in 2013 are driven primarily by the net release of valuation allowances related to the realizability of foreign deferred tax assets of $11.5 million, the remeasurement of certain deferred tax assets and liabilities of $11.3 million and recognizing adjustments from filing our 2012 U.S. federal and state tax returns of $11.0 million. The remaining net discrete tax items relate primarily to recognizing settlements related to prior year income tax audits, law changes within a foreign jurisdiction, the retroactive extension during first quarter 2013 of the U.S. R&D credit for 2012, foreign audit adjustments and other adjustments to deferred tax assets and liabilities.

 

Discrete tax net benefits in 2012 are based largely on benefits related to remeasurement of certain deferred tax assets and liabilities resulting from changing tax jurisdictions, recognizing adjustments from filing our 2011 U.S. federal tax return as well as a release of a valuation allowance related to a capital loss carryforward. Discrete benefits were partially offset by the remeasurement of certain deferred tax assets and liabilities resulting from changes in local country tax rates and state and foreign country audit settlements and adjustments.

 

Discrete tax items in 2011 include a charge recorded in the fourth quarter related to the realizability of foreign net operating loss carryforwards, as well as discrete tax net expense related to the remeasurement of our deferred tax assets due to the impact of a change in our blended state tax rate. These items were partially offset by net benefits related to recognizing adjustments from filing our 2010 U.S. federal returns and other International income tax returns and recognizing settlements and adjustments related to our 1999 through 2001 U.S. income tax returns. We also had benefits from prior year state refund claims and benefits from recognizing settlements and adjustments related to our 2007 through 2008 U.S. income tax returns.

 

The decrease in the 2013 adjusted tax rate compared to 2012 was due primarily to global tax planning actions, extension of the R&D credit and geographic income mix. Our adjusted tax rate was 29.9% in both 2012 and 2011.

 

Net Income Attributable to Ecolab

 

 

 

 

 

 

PERCENT CHANGE

MILLIONS

 

2013

2012

2011

2013

2012

Reported GAAP net income

 

$

967.8

 

$

703.6

 

$

462.5

 

38

%

52

%

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Special (gains) and charges

 

156.4

 

195.0

 

125.6

 

 

 

 

 

Discrete tax expense (benefit)

 

(41.7

)

(9.2

)

7.4

 

 

 

 

 

Nalco merger impact

 

 

 

2.1

 

 

 

 

 

Non-GAAP adjusted net income

 

$

1,082.5

 

$

889.4

 

$

597.6

 

22

%

49

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted Earnings Attributable to Ecolab Per Common Share (EPS)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PERCENT CHANGE

DOLLARS

 

2013

2012

2011

2013

2012

Reported GAAP EPS

 

$

3.16

 

$

2.35

 

$

1.91

 

34

%

23

%

Adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Special (gains) and charges

 

0.51

 

0.65

 

0.52

 

 

 

 

 

Discrete tax expense (benefit)

 

(0.14

)

(0.03

)

0.03

 

 

 

 

 

Nalco merger impact

 

 

 

0.08

 

 

 

 

 

Non-GAAP adjusted EPS

 

$

3.54

 

$

2.98

 

$

2.54

 

19

%

17

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note: Per share amounts do not necessarily sum due to rounding.

 

Reported net income attributable to Ecolab totaled $967.8 million, $703.6 million and $462.5 million during 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, which resulted in reported earnings per share of $3.16, $2.35 and $1.91 for the corresponding periods.

 

Amounts for 2013, 2012 and 2011 include special (gains) and charges and discrete tax items. Additionally, 2011 amounts include Nalco merger related activity in our consolidated results beginning in December 2011, as well as shares issued as consideration for the equity portion of the Nalco merger.

 

20



 

Excluding special (gains) and charges and the impact of discrete items from 2013, 2012 and 2011, and the impact of the Nalco merger from 2011, adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per share increased 22% and 19%, respectively, when comparing 2013 to 2012 and increased 49% and 17%, respectively, when comparing 2012 to 2011.

 

Currency translation had an unfavorable impact of approximately $0.04 per share on diluted earnings per share for 2013 compared to 2012. The unfavorable currency translation excludes the impact of the Venezuela devaluation as the U.S. dollar is used as the functional currency for our subsidiaries in Venezuela. Currency translation had an unfavorable impact of approximately $0.06 per share on diluted earnings per share for 2012 compared to 2011.

 

Segment Performance

 

As discussed at the beginning of this MD&A, effective in the first quarter of 2013, we changed our reportable segments due to a change in our organizational model designed to support the business following the Nalco merger and facilitate global growth. Under the reporting structure implemented in the first quarter of 2013, our ten operating units are aggregated into four reportable segments: Global Industrial, Global Institutional, Global Energy and Other. We did not operate under the realigned segment structure prior to 2013. For periods prior to its disposition in December 2012, the Vehicle Care operating unit was included within the Other reportable segment within the realigned reportable segment structure.

 

All comparisons provided in the following tables and discussions are based on the segment structure implemented in the first quarter of 2013.

 

During the third quarter of 2013, we made a change to the way we measure and report certain segments’ operating income, with intangible asset amortization specific to the Champion transaction moving to the Global Energy reportable segment from the Corporate segment. To provide meaningful comparisons, this change was made retroactively, resulting in $14.0 million of amortization expense moving to the Global Energy reportable segment from the Corporate segment for the second quarter of 2013. No other segments were impacted by this change.

 

The international amounts included within each of our four reportable segments are based on translation into U.S. dollars at the fixed currency exchange rates used by management for 2013. The difference between the fixed currency exchange rates and the actual currency exchange rates is reported as “effect of foreign currency translation” in the following tables. All other accounting policies of the reportable segments are consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the accounting policies of the company described in Note 2. Additional information about our reportable segments is included in Note 17.

 

Sales by Reportable Segment

 

Fixed currency sales for 2013, 2012 and 2011 and pro forma fixed currency sales for 2011 for our reportable segments are shown in the table below. Sales amounts for 2012 and 2011 have been presented based on the segment structure implemented in the first quarter of 2013:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PERCENT CHANGE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REPORTED

 

PRO FORMA

 

 

 

 

REPORTED

 

PRO FORMA

 

MILLIONS

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2011

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2012

 

Global Industrial

 

$

4,905.1

 

 

$

 4,762.2

 

$

 2,036.6

 

$

 4,623.3

*

 

3

%

 

 

 

 

3

%**

 

Global Institutional

 

4,202.5

 

 

4,063.2

 

3,852.0

 

3,852.0

 

 

3

 

 

5

%

 

5

 

 

Global Energy

 

3,532.8

 

 

2,275.4

 

100.5

 

1,882.2

*

 

55

***

 

 

 

 

21

**

 

Other

 

715.0

 

 

736.3

 

701.4

 

701.4

 

 

(3

)

 

5

 

 

5

 

 

Corporate

 

 

 

 

(29.6

)

(29.6

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Subtotal at fixed currency

 

13,355.4

 

 

11,837.1

 

6,660.9

 

11,029.3

*

 

13

 

 

78

 

 

7

**

 

Effect of foreign currency translation

 

(102.0

)

 

1.6

 

137.6

 

254.6

*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

$

13,253.4

 

 

$

 11,838.7

 

$

 6,798.5

 

$

 11,283.9

*

 

12

%

 

74

%

 

5

%**

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

* Amounts represent the 2011 pro forma equivalent to the 2013 and 2012 amounts presented.

** Percentages represent growth rates for 2012 as compared against 2011 pro forma amounts.

*** Global Energy’s acquisition adjusted fixed currency sales increased 11%.

 

As discussed previously in this MD&A, in order to provide the most meaningful comparison of results by reportable segment, in addition to discussing changes in 2012 reported results against 2011 reported results, the following sales discussion also provides analysis on 2012 reported results versus 2011 pro forma results.

 

GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL

 

 

Fixed currency sales for our Global Industrial segment increased 3% when comparing 2013 against 2012. Due primarily to the timing of the Nalco merger, Global Industrial 2012 fixed currency sales increased by $2.7 billion over 2011 fixed currency sales. Fixed currency sales increased 3% when comparing 2012 against 2011 pro forma fixed currency sales. Acquisitions did not have a significant impact on fixed currency sales growth for 2013 or 2012. When measured at public currency rates, Global Industrial segment sales increased 2% when comparing 2013 sales to 2012 sales, and were flat when comparing 2012 sales to 2011 pro forma sales.

 

21



 

Fixed currency sales results for our Global Industrial operating units were as follows:

 

Global Water - Fixed currency sales increased 2% in 2013 compared to the prior year. Growth in heavy industries offset declines in mining and a de-emphasis of equipment sales. We are focused on synergies and product innovation to build growth and drive market penetration. At a regional level, growth was led by good increases in Asia Pacific and modest sales gains in North America and Latin America, which offset declines in Europe, Middle East, Africa (“EMEA”), as they continue to reflect weak economic conditions in that region.

 

Due primarily to the timing of the Nalco merger, Global Water 2012 fixed currency sales increased by $1.9 billion over 2011 fixed currency sales. Global Water 2012 fixed currency sales increased 2% compared to 2011 pro forma fixed currency sales. When comparing fixed currency sales for 2012 against pro forma fixed currency sales for 2011, growth was led by increases in the food & beverage, power and primary metals businesses. 2011 pro forma sales also benefited from a wastewater project sale, impacting the comparison against 2012. From a regional perspective, sales growth in North America, Latin America and Asia Pacific more than offset declines in EMEA.

 

Global Food & Beverage - Fixed currency sales increased 7% in 2013 compared to 2012. Acquisition adjusted fixed currency sales increased 4%. The increase was led by gains in the beverage & brewing, dairy, and agri markets. Food & Beverage remains focused on customer gains and product penetration. All regions showed sales increases, led by strong growth in Latin America, with moderate increases in Asia Pacific, EMEA and North America.

 

Fixed currency sales increased 5% in 2012 compared to 2011. Growth was led by gains in the dairy, food and agri markets. At a regional level, all regions showed increases, led by double-digit growth in Latin America, good gains in both Asia Pacific and North America, and moderate growth in EMEA.

 

Global Paper - Fixed currency sales increased 2% in 2013 compared to the prior year. Growth was driven by increased product penetration, partially offset by continued lower customer plant utilization. At a regional level, growth was led by double digit gains in Asia Pacific and Latin America, which offset declines in North America and EMEA.

 

Due primarily to the timing of the Nalco merger, Global Paper 2012 fixed currency sales increased by $0.8 billion over 2011 fixed currency sales. Global Paper 2012 fixed currency sales decreased 1% compared to 2011 pro forma fixed currency sales. When comparing fixed currency sales for 2012 against pro forma fixed currency sales for 2011, the decrease was driven by lower customer plant utilization and down time, as well as the strategic elimination of certain low margin business. From a regional perspective, modest growth in Latin America and EMEA was more than offset by sales declines in North America and Asia Pacific.

 

Global Textile Care   - Fixed currency sales decreased 1% in 2013 compared to 2012. Pricing gains and new product penetration in North America were more than offset by lower sales in EMEA.

 

Fixed currency sales for 2012 were flat when compared to 2011. Increased product penetration and pricing gains in North America were offset by decreased sales in EMEA.

 

GLOBAL INSTITUTIONAL

 

 

Fixed currency sales for our Global Institutional segment increased 3% when comparing 2013 to 2012 and 5% when comparing 2012 to 2011. Acquisitions did not have a significant impact on total Global Institutional segment fixed currency sales growth for either 2013 or 2012. When measured at public currency rates, Global Institutional segment sales increased 3% when comparing both 2013 sales to 2012 sales, and 2012 sales to 2011 sales.

 

Fixed currency sales results for our Global Institutional operating units were as follows:

 

Global Institutional - Fixed currency sales increased 2% in 2013 compared to the prior year. Demand from lodging customers showed modest growth, while overall foodservice foot traffic remained soft. Sales initiatives, effective product programs and targeting new accounts continued to lead the results of our Global Institutional operating unit. We continue to focus on executing global sales initiatives and introducing product innovations that deliver increased value. At a regional level, double-digit growth in Latin America, solid gains in North America and modest increases in Asia Pacific more than offset lower sales in EMEA.

 

Fixed currency sales increased 4% in 2012 compared to 2011. Acquisition adjusted fixed currency sales increased 3%. Sales initiatives, targeting new accounts, and effective product programs led our results. Demand from our lodging customers showed modest growth, while overall foodservice foot traffic was soft. From a regional perspective, strong growth in Latin America and good gains in both Asia Pacific and North America more than offset flat sales in EMEA.

 

Global Specialty - Fixed currency sales increased 12% in 2013 compared to 2012. Our quick service and food retail businesses both produced double-digit growth, benefiting from new accounts and increased product penetration. All regions showed double-digit sales growth.

 

Fixed currency sales for 2012 increased 10% compared to 2011. The sales increase was led by double-digit growth from our food retail business, which benefited from new accounts, and solid results from our quick service business. All regions showed sales increases, led by Asia Pacific and EMEA, along with strong results within North America.

 

22



 

Global Healthcare - Fixed currency sales increased 2% in 2013 compared to the prior year. Sales gains were led by growth in surgical drapes and contamination control. Growth from account gains and new products were slowed by continued weakness in the overall U.S. and EMEA healthcare markets. Despite this headwind, both North America and EMEA showed modest sales growth.

 

Fixed currency sales increased 11% in 2012 compared to 2011. Acquisition adjusted fixed currency sales increased 6%. Sales growth was led by our patient temperature management business, environmental hygiene and infection barrier solutions. At a regional level, both EMEA and North America showed solid sales gains.

 

GLOBAL ENERGY

 

 

Fixed currency sales increased 55% in 2013 compared to 2012, with the increase largely driven by the Champion acquisition. Acquisition adjusted fixed currency sales increased 11%. The increase in acquisition adjusted fixed currency sales reflected double-digit growth in our upstream business resulting from continued performance of high growth energy sources, including deepwater, shale and oil sands accounts as well as strong results from on-shore conventional sources. Sales for our downstream business had good gains, resulting from strong share gains and increased North America refining.

 

Due primarily to the timing of the Nalco merger, Global Energy 2012 fixed currency sales increased by $2.2 billion over 2011 fixed currency sales. Global Energy 2012 fixed currency sales increased 21% compared to 2011 pro forma fixed currency sales. When comparing fixed currency sales for 2012 against pro forma fixed currency sales for 2011, the increase reflected strong volume growth in our upstream business resulting from good market conditions, share gains and focus on high growth energy sources. Upstream markets were strong in the Americas and the Middle East. Our downstream business showed steady growth and market share gains across all regions.

 

When measured at public currency rates, Global Energy segment sales increased 54% when comparing 2013 sales to 2012 sales, and 20% when comparing 2012 sales to 2011 pro forma sales.

 

OTHER

 

 

Fixed currency sales for our Other segment decreased 3% when comparing 2013 to 2012 and increased 5% when comparing 2012 to 2011. Acquisition adjusted fixed currency sales growth, including the impact of the Vehicle Care divestiture in late 2012, was 5% for 2013. Acquisition adjusted fixed currency sales growth was 5% for 2012. When measured at public currency rates, Other segment sales decreased 3% when comparing 2013 sales to 2012 sales, and increased 4% when comparing 2012 sales to 2011 sales.

 

Fixed currency sales results for our Other operating units were as follows:

 

Global Pest Elimination - Fixed currency sales increased 5% in 2013 compared to the prior year. Sales gains in the food & beverage, healthcare and foodservice markets led the growth. Market penetration and sales of innovative service offerings and technologies benefited results. All regions showed sales increases, led by Asia Pacific with good growth in Latin America, North America and modest gains in EMEA.

 

Fixed currency sales increased 6% in 2012 compared to 2011. Acquisition adjusted fixed currency sales increased 5%. Gains in the food & beverage and healthcare markets and improved results in the foodservice market led the growth. All regions showed sales increases, led by Latin America and Asia Pacific, with good growth in both EMEA and North America.

 

Equipment Care - Sales increased 8% in 2013 compared to the prior year. Service and installed parts sales increased, benefiting from pricing, product penetraition, improved productivity and new accounts. Direct parts sales showed good gains against results from the prior year.

 

Sales grew 4% in 2012 compared to 2011. Service and installed parts sales increased, benefiting from new accounts and pricing gains. Direct parts sales decreased compared to results from 2011.

 

CO RPOR ATE

 

The corporate segment includes $29.6 million of sales reductions in 2011 related to the modification of a customer agreement. There was no sales activity in the corporate segment in 2013 or 2012.

 

23



 

Operating Income by Reportable Segment

 

Fixed currency operating income for 2013, 2012 and 2011 and pro forma fixed currency operating income for 2011 for our reportable segments are shown in the table below. Operating income amounts for 2012 and 2011 have been presented based on the segment structure implemented in the first quarter of 2013.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PERCENT CHANGE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REPORTED

 

PRO FORMA

 

 

 

 

REPORTED

 

PRO FORMA

 

MILLIONS

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2011

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2012

 

Global Industrial

 

 $ 

637.3

 

 

$

 569.5

 

$   

234.3

 

$  

496.9

*

 

12

%

 

 

 

 

15

%**

 

Global Institutional

 

764.5

 

 

700.7

 

585.6

 

585.6

 

 

9

 

 

20

%

 

20

 

 

Global Energy

 

492.1

 

 

360.7

 

16.2

 

263.4

*

 

36

***

 

 

 

 

37

**

 

Other

 

97.9

 

 

103.0

 

96.6

 

96.6

 

 

(5

)

 

7

 

 

7

 

 

Corporate

 

(411.6

)

 

(442.3

)

(192.4

)

(207.4

)*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Subtotal at fixed currency

 

1,580.2

 

 

1,291.6

 

740.3

 

1,235.1

*

 

22

 

 

74

 

 

5

**

 

Effect of foreign currency translation

 

(19.6

)

 

(2.3

)

13.5

 

21.6

*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

 $ 

1,560.6

 

 

$

 1,289.3

 

$   

753.8

 

$  

1,256.7

*

 

21

%

 

71

%

 

3

%**

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

* Amounts represent the 2011 pro forma equivalent to the 2013 and 2012 amounts presented.

** Percentages represent growth rates for 2012 as compared against 2011 pro forma amounts.

*** Global Energy’s acquisition adjusted fixed currency operating income increased 22%.

 

Operating income as a percentage of net sales ("operating income margin") for each of our reportable segments was as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REPORTED

 

PRO FORMA

 

PERCENTAGE

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

2011

 

Global Industrial

 

 

13.0 %

 

12.0

%

 

*

 

 

10.7

%

 

Global Institutional

 

 

18.2

 

17.2

 

 

15.2

%

 

15.2

 

 

Global Energy

 

 

13.9

 

15.9

 

 

*

 

 

14.0

 

 

Other

 

 

13.7

 

14.0

 

 

13.8

 

 

13.8

 

 

Consolidated

 

 

11.8 %

 

10.9

%

 

11.1

%

 

11.1

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*The 2011 operating income margins for the Global Industrial and Global Energy segments have not been included as they are not necessarily indicative of full year or future trends, as based on the close date of the Nalco merger, they include only one month of U.S. activity.

 

As discussed previously in this MD&A, in order to provide the most meaningful comparison of results by reportable segment, in addition to discussing changes in 2012 reported results against 2011 reported results, the following operating income discussions also provide analysis on 2012 reported results versus 2011 pro forma results.

 

GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL

 

Fixed currency operating income for our Global Industrial segment increased 12% when comparing 2013 to 2012. Acquisition adjusted fixed currency operating income increased 11%. Our operating income margin showed improvement comparing 2013 to 2012. The increase in fixed currency operating income and the operating margin improvement were driven by pricing gains, sales volume increases, cost saving actions and synergies, which more than offset investments in the business and other cost increases. When measured at public currency rates, Global Industrial segment operating income increased 11% when comparing 2013 against 2012.

 

Due primarily to the timing of the Nalco merger, Global Industrial 2012 fixed currency operating income increased by $335.2 million over 2011 fixed currency operating income. Fixed currency operating income increased 15% when comparing 2012 against 2011 pro forma fixed currency operating income. Acquisition adjusted fixed currency operating income growth was 16% when comparing 2012 against 2011 pro forma fixed currency operating income. Our operating income margin showed improvement comparing 2012 against pro form 2011 results. When comparing 2012 fixed currency operating income against pro forma fixed currency operating income for 2011, the overall increase and operating margin improvement were driven by pricing gains, sales volume increases, cost saving actions and synergies, which more than offset higher delivered product costs. When measured at public currency rates, Global Industrial segment operating income increased 12% when comparing 2012 against 2011 pro forma operating income.

 

GLOBAL INSTITUTIONAL

 

Fixed currency operating income for our Global Institutional segment increased 9% when comparing 2013 to 2012. Our operating income margin showed improvement comparing 2013 to 2012. The increase in fixed currency operating income and operating margin improvement were driven by pricing gains, sales volume increases and cost saving actions, which more than offset investments in the business, higher delivered product costs and other cost increases. When measured at public currency rates, Global Institutional segment operating income increased 8% when comparing 2013 against 2012.

 

Fixed currency operating income increased 20% when comparing 2012 against 2011. Acquisition adjusted fixed currency operating income growth was 19%. Our operating income margin showed improvement when comparing 2012 to 2011. The increase in fixed currency operating income and operating margin improvement were driven by sales volume increases, pricing gains, cost saving actions and synergies, which more than offset higher delivered product costs and investments in the business. When measured at public currency rates, Global Institutional segment operating income increased 15% when comparing 2012 against 2011.

 

24



 

GLOBAL ENERGY

 

Fixed currency operating income for our Global Energy segment increased 36% when comparing 2013 to 2012, with the largest impact of the increase resulting from the Champion acquisition. Acquisition adjusted fixed currency operating income increased 22%. The increase in acquisition adjusted fixed currency operating income was a result of sales volume increases, pricing gains and synergies, which more than offset investments in the business. Global Energy's operating income margin declined when comparing 2013 to 2012, reflecting the impact of Champion and the corresponding acquisition amortization. When measured at public currency rates, Global Energy segment operating income increased 35% when comparing 2013 against 2012.

 

Due primarily to the timing of the Nalco merger, Global Energy's 2012 fixed currency operating income increased by $344.5 million over 2011 fixed currency operating income. Fixed currency operating income increased 37% when comparing 2012 against 2011 pro forma fixed currency operating income. Our operating income margin showed improvement comparing 2012 against pro form 2011 results. When comparing 2012 fixed currency operating income against pro forma fixed currency operating income for 2011, the overall increase and operating margin improvement were driven by strong sales volume increases, pricing gains and synergies, which more than offset higher delivered product costs and investments in the business. When measured at public currency rates, Global Energy segment operating income increased 34% when comparing 2012 against 2011 pro forma operating income.

 

OTHER

 

Fixed currency operating income for our Other segment decreased 5% and operating margin decreased when comparing 2013 to 2012. Acquisition adjusted fixed currency operating income, including the impact of the Vehicle Care divestiture, increased 6%. The increase in acquisition adjusted fixed currency operating income was driven by sales volume growth and pricing gains, which more than offset investments in the business and other costs. When measured at public currency rates, Other segment operating income decreased 5% when comparing 2013 against 2012.

 

Fixed currency operating income increased 7% when comparing 2012 against 2011. Acquisition adjusted fixed currency operating income growth was 6%. Our operating income margin showed improvement when comparing 2012 to 2011. The increase in fixed currency operating income and operating margin improvement were driven by driven by sales volume and pricing gains, which more than offset higher delivery service costs and investments in the field sales organization. When measured at public currency rates, Other segment operating income increased 5% when comparing 2012 against 2011.

 

CORPORATE

 

Consistent with the company’s internal management reporting, and including the change discussed previously in this MD&A, the Corporate segment includes amortization specifically from the Nalco merger and certain integration costs for both the Nalco and Champion transactions. The Corporate segment also includes special (gains) and charges reported on the Consolidated Statement of Income.

 

FINANCIAL POSITION & LIQUIDITY

 

Financial Position

 

Total assets were $19.6 billion as of December 31, 2013, compared to total assets of $17.6 billion as of December 31, 2012. The increase in assets was driven primarily by the net impact of the Champion acquisition, which included $2.0 billion related to goodwill and intangibles. The decrease in cash from 2012 to 2013 was largely due to the use of cash for the Champion acquisition. The negative impact of foreign currency exchange rates on the value of our international assets was offset by the increase of assets from general business activities.

 

Total liabilities were $12.2 billion as of December 31, 2013, compared to total liabilities of $11.4 billion as of December 31, 2012. Total debt was $6.9 billion as of December 31, 2013 and $6.5 billion as of December 31, 2012, reflecting additional debt required to close the Champion transaction, partially offset by the repayment of a portion of such debt, as well as the repayment of our Series A euro notes in December 2013. The ratio of total debt to capitalization (total debt plus total equity) was 48% at year-end 2013 and 52% at year-end 2012. We view our debt to capitalization ratio as an important indicator of our creditworthiness.

 

Cash Flows

 

Operating Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DOLLAR CHANGE

 

MILLIONS

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

2011

 

2013

 

2012

 

Cash provided by operating activities

 

 

$

1,559.8

 

 

$

 1,203.0

 

 

$

 685.5

 

  $

356.8

 

 

$

 517.5

 

 

We continue to generate strong cash flow from operations, allowing us to fund our ongoing operations, acquisitions, investments in the business, debt repayments, pension obligations and return cash to our shareholders through share repurchases and dividend payments.

 

Comparability of cash generated from operating activities across 2011 to 2013 was favorably impacted by increased income, primarily driven by the net impact of the Nalco and Champion transactions.

 

The combination of accounts receivable, inventories and accounts payable (“working capital”) increased $127 million, $113 million and $81 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The cash flow impact across the three years from accounts receivable was driven by increased sales volumes and timing of collections. Our bad debt expense was $28 million or 0.2% of sales in 2013, $37 million or 0.3% of net sales in 2012 and $15 million or 0.2% of net sales in 2011. We continue to monitor our receivable portfolio and the creditworthiness of our customers closely and do not expect our future cash flows to be materially impacted. The cash flow impact across the three years from inventories and accounts payable was impacted by timing of inventory purchases and payments.

 

As shown in the table below, pension and postretirement plan contributions, cash activity related to restructuring, cash paid for income taxes and cash paid for interest also impacted comparability.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DOLLAR CHANGE 

 

MILLIONS

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Pensions and postretirement plan contributions

 

 

$

80.0

 

$

254.9

 

$

156.6

 

 

$

(174.9

)

 

$

98.3

 

Restructuring payments

 

 

120.6

 

72.7

 

25.1

 

 

47.9

 

 

47.6

 

Income tax payments

 

 

434.2

 

222.6

 

224.2

 

 

211.6

 

 

(1.6

)

Interest payments

 

 

258.9

 

279.0

 

71.1

 

 

(20.1

)

 

207.9

 

 

 

25



 

Of the pension and postretirement plan contributions shown in the previous table, $150 million and $100 million in 2012 and 2011, respectively, represented voluntary contributions to our U.S. pension plans. We made no voluntary contributions in 2013.

 

Non-recurring payments in 2013 related to certain liabilities assumed with the Champion acquisition and non-recurring payments in 2011 related to Nalco merger financial advisory service payments, a large Nalco lease payment and a payment on a customer agreement modification also impacted comparability.

 

Investing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DOLLAR CHANGE

 

MILLIONS

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Cash used for investing activities

 

 

$

(2,087.7

)

 

$

(487.9

)

$

(2,024.3

)

 

$

(1,599.8

)

 

$

1,536.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash used for investing activities is primarily impacted by the timing of business acquisitions and dispositions as well as from capital investments in the business.

 

Total cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired, in 2013 and 2011 was $1.4 billion and $1.6 billion respectively. Total cash received from dispositions, net of acquisitions during 2012, was $88 million.

 

The Champion acquisition accounted for $1.3 billion of the acquisition activity in 2013. Other acquisitions in 2013 included Quimiproductos S.A. de C.V. and OOO Master Chemicals, which were added to our Global Industrial and Global Energy reportable segments, respectively. The net cash received from dispositions in 2012 was driven primarily by the sale of our Vehicle Care division. Partially offsetting this were the acquisitions of Esoform, InsetCenter, and Econ Indústria e Comércio de Produtos de Higiene e Limpeza Ltda., which were added to our Global Institutional, Other and Global Institutional reportable segments, respectively. The Nalco merger accounted for $1.3 billion of the acquisition activity in 2011. Other acquisitions in 2011 included the Cleantec business of Campbell Brothers Ltd. and O.R. Solutions, Inc., which were added to our Global Industrial and Global Institutional reportable segments, respectively.

 

We continue to target strategic business acquisitions which complement our growth strategy and expect to continue to make capital investments and acquisitions in the future to support our long-term growth. See Note 4 for further information on our business acquisition and disposition activity.

 

We continue to make capital investments in the business, including process control and process monitoring equipment, equipment used by our customers to dispense our products and manufacturing facilities. Total capital expenditures, including software, were $662 million, $608 million and $366 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The increase in capital expenditures from 2011 to 2012 was due primarily to investments in Nalco business units.

 

Financing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DOLLAR CHANGE

 

MILLIONS

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Cash provided by (used for) financing activities

 

 

$

(292.6

)

 

$

(1,393.6

)

$

2,933.8

 

 

$

1,101.0

 

 

$

(4,327.4

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Our cash flows from financing activities primarily reflect the issuances and repayment of debt, common stock repurchases, dividend payments and proceeds from common stock issuances related to our equity incentive programs.

 

Our 2013 financing activities included $900 million of long-term debt borrowings initiated in connection with the Champion transaction. Our 2013 financing activities also included the scheduled repayment of our 125 million Series A euro notes ($170 million) in December 2013, the redemption of debt acquired through the Champion transaction and repayment of $100 million of term loan borrowings. Net repayments of commercial paper and notes payable led to a net cash outflow of $278 million during 2013.

 

Our 2012 financing activities included $1,695 million of long-term debt repayments, primarily related to the redemption of Nalco’s senior notes in January 2012. Partially offsetting the debt repayment, we separately issued $500 million of senior notes in public debt offerings in August 2012 and December 2012. Net repayments of commercial paper and notes payable led to a net cash outflow of $387 million during 2012.

 

Our 2011 financing activities included the issuance of $3.75 billion of senior notes through a public debt offering completed in December 2011 and the issuance of $500 million of private placement senior notes, completed in November 2011. Our 2011 financing activities also included the scheduled repayment of our $150 million 6.875% notes and the repayment of $1.3 billion of long-term debt assumed as part of the Nalco merger. Net borrowings of commercial paper and notes payable led to net cash inflow of $907 million during 2011.

 

Shares are repurchased for the purpose of partially offsetting the dilutive effect of our equity compensation plans and stock issued in acquisitions and to efficiently return capital to shareholders.

 

Cash proceeds and tax benefits from stock option exercises provide a portion of the funding for repurchase activity. During 2013, 2012 and 2011, we had $308 million, $210 million and $690 million of share repurchases, respectively.

 

In September 2011, we announced a $1.0 billion share repurchase program, contingent upon closing the merger with Nalco. As part of this program, in December 2011, we entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement (“ASR”) with a financial institution to repurchase $500 million of our common stock. Under the ASR, we received 8,330,379 shares of our common stock in December 2011. The final per share purchase price and the total number of shares to be repurchased under the ASR agreement were generally based on the volume weighted average price of the company’s common stock during the term of the agreement. The ASR agreement ended in the first quarter of 2012. In connection with the finalization of the accelerated share repurchase agreement we received an additional 122,314 shares of common stock, with no additional cash impact in 2012. The $1.0 billion share repurchase program was completed in the fourth quarter of 2013.

 

In December 2013, we increased our indicated annual dividend rate by 20%. This represents the 22nd consecutive year we have increased our dividend. We have paid dividends on our common stock for 77 consecutive years. Cash dividends declared per share of common stock, by quarter, for each of the last three years were as follows:

 

 

 

FIRST

 

SECOND

 

THIRD

 

FOURTH

 

 

 

 

 

QUARTER

 

QUARTER

 

QUARTER

 

QUARTER

 

YEAR

 

2013

 

$

0.2300

 

$

0.2300

 

$

0.2300

 

$

0.2750

 

$

0.9650

 

2012

 

0.2000

 

0.2000

 

0.2000

 

0.2300

 

0.8300

 

2011

 

0.1750

 

0.1750

 

0.1750

 

0.2000

 

0.7250

 

 

26



 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We currently expect to fund all of our cash requirements which are reasonably foreseeable for 2014, including scheduled debt repayments, new investments in the business, share repurchases, dividend payments, possible business acquisitions and pension contributions, with cash from operating activities, cash reserves available in the U.S. or in certain foreign jurisdictions and additional short-term and/or long-term borrowings. We continue to expect our operating cash flow to remain strong.

 

As of December 31, 2013, we had $339.2 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand, of which $306.1 million was held outside of the U.S. We have recorded deferred tax liabilities of $94.5 million and $68.3 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, for pre-acquisition foreign earnings associated with the Nalco merger and Champion acquisition that we intend to repatriate. These liabilities were recorded as part of the respective purchase price accounting of each transaction. We consider the remaining portion of our foreign earnings to be indefinitely reinvested in foreign jurisdictions and we have no intention to repatriate such funds. We continue to be focused on building our business in high growth global markets and these funds are available for use by our international operations. To the extent the remaining portion of the foreign earnings would be repatriated, such amounts would be subject to income tax or foreign withholding tax liabilities that may be fully or partially offset by foreign tax credits, both in the U. S. and in various applicable foreign jurisdictions.

 

As of December 31, 2013, we had a $1.5 billion multi-year credit facility, which expires in September 2016. In August 2013, our $500 million, 364 day credit facility expired and was not replaced. Our credit facility has been established with a diverse syndicate of banks. There were no borrowings under our credit facilities as of December 31, 2013 or 2012.

 

The credit facility supports our $1.5 billion U.S. commercial paper program, which was reduced to $1.5 billion from $2.0 billion following the expiration of our 364 day credit facility, and our $200 million European commercial paper program. Combined borrowing under these two commercial paper programs may not exceed $1.5 billion. As of December 31, 2013, we had $305 million in outstanding U.S. commercial paper, with an average annual interest rate of 0.3%, and no amounts outstanding under our European commercial paper program. As of December 31, 2013, both programs were rated A-2 by Standard & Poor’s and P-2 by Moody’s.

 

Additionally, we have other committed and uncommitted credit lines of $592 million with major international banks and financial institutions to support our general global funding needs. Approximately $451 million of these credit lines were undrawn and available for use as of year-end 2013.

 

In April 2013, in connection with the close of the Champion acquisition, we initiated term loan borrowings of $900 million and increased our commercial paper borrowings. The term loan bears interest at a floating base rate plus a credit rating based margin. The term loan can be repaid in part or in full at any time without penalty, but in any event must be repaid in full by April 2016. During 2013, we repaid $100 million of the term loan borrowings.

 

As of December 31, 2013, Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s rated our long-term credit at BBB+ (stable outlook) and Baa1 (negative outlook), respectively. A reduction in our long-term credit ratings could limit or preclude our ability to issue commercial paper under our current programs. A credit rating reduction could also adversely affect our ability to renew existing, or negotiate new, credit facilities in the future and could increase the cost of these facilities. Should this occur, we could seek additional sources of funding, including issuing additional term notes or bonds. In addition, we have the ability, at our option, to draw upon our $1.5 billion of committed credit facility prior to termination.

 

We are in compliance with our debt covenants and other requirements of our credit agreements and indentures.

 

A schedule of our obligations under various notes payable, long-term debt agreements, operating leases with noncancelable terms in excess of one year and interest obligations are summarized in the following table:

 

MILLIONS

 

 

 

PAYMENTS DUE BY PERIOD

 

CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS

 

TOTAL

 

LESS
THAN
1 YEAR

 

2-3
YEARS

 

4-5
YEARS

 

MORE
THAN
5 YEARS

 

Notes payable

 

$

51

 

$

51

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

Commercial paper

 

305

 

305

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt

 

6,536

 

501

 

3,042

 

750

 

2,243

 

Capital lease obligations

 

13

 

4

 

6

 

1

 

2

 

Operating leases

 

611

 

122

 

190

 

131

 

168

 

Interest*

 

1,971

 

212

 

358

 

238

 

1,163

 

Total contractual cash obligations

 

$

9,487

 

$

1,195

 

$

3,596

 

$

1,120

 

$

3,576

 

 

*

Interest on variable rate debt was calculated using the interest rate at year-end 2013.

 

As of December 31, 2013, our gross liability for uncertain tax positions was $99 million. We are not able to reasonably estimate the amount by which the liability will increase or decrease over an extended period of time or whether a cash settlement of the liability will be required. Therefore, these amounts have been excluded from the schedule of contractual obligations.

 

We are not required to make any contributions to our U.S. pension and postretirement healthcare benefit plans in 2014, based on plan asset values as of December 31, 2013. We are required to fund certain international pension benefit plans in accordance with local legal requirements. We estimate contributions to be made to our international plans will approximate $53 million in 2014. These amounts have been excluded from the schedule of contractual obligations.

 

We lease certain sales and administrative office facilities, distribution centers, research and manufacturing facilities and other equipment under longer-term operating leases. Vehicle leases are generally shorter in duration. Vehicle leases have guaranteed residual value requirements that have historically been satisfied primarily by the proceeds on the sale of the vehicles.

 

Except for approximately $78 million of letters of credit supporting domestic and international commercial relationships and transactions, primarily for our North America high deductible insurance program, we do not have significant unconditional purchase obligations, or significant other commercial commitments, such as commitments under lines of credit, standby letters of credit, guarantees, standby repurchase obligations or other commercial commitments.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Other than operating leases, we do not have any off-balance sheet financing arrangements. See Note 13 for information on our operating leases. Through the normal course of business, we have established various joint ventures that have not been consolidated within our financial statements as we are not the primary beneficiary. The joint ventures help us to meet local ownership requirements, to more quickly achieve operational scale, to expand our ability to provide customers a more fully integrated offering or to provide other benefits to our business or customers. These entities have

 

27



 

not been utilized as special purposes entities, which are sometimes established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet financial arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. As such, we are not exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships.

 

New Accounting Pronouncements

Information regarding new accounting pronouncements is included in Note 2.

 

Market Risk

We enter into contractual arrangements (derivatives) in the ordinary course of business to manage foreign currency exposure and interest rate risks. We do not enter into derivatives for speculative or trading purposes. Our use of derivatives is subject to internal policies that provide guidelines for control, counterparty risk and ongoing monitoring and reporting and is designed to reduce the volatility associated with movements in foreign exchange and interest rates on our income statement and cash flows.

 

We enter into foreign currency forward contracts to hedge certain intercompany financial arrangements, and to hedge against the effect of exchange rate fluctuations on transactions related to cash flows denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars. See Note 8 for further information on our hedging activity.

 

We manage interest expense using a mix of fixed and floating rate debt. To help manage borrowing costs, we may enter into interest rate swap agreements. Under these arrangements, we agree to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between fixed and floating interest amounts calculated by reference to an agreed-upon notional principal amount. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, we did not have any interest rate swaps outstanding.

 

Based on a sensitivity analysis (assuming a 10% adverse change in market rates) of our foreign exchange and interest rate derivatives and other financial instruments, changes in exchange rates or interest rates would not materially affect our financial position and liquidity. The effect on our results of operations would be substantially offset by the impact of the hedged items.

 

Global Environment

Approximately half of our sales are outside of the United States. Our international operations subject us to changes in economic conditions and foreign currency exchange rates as well as political uncertainty in some countries which could impact future operating results. During 2012 and 2013, economic conditions in Europe remained challenging. Certain countries in Europe and other developing countries continued to experience instability in credit markets, including diminished liquidity and credit availability as well as currency fluctuations which could negatively impact our customers located in these and other geographic areas. We currently do not foresee any specific credit or market risks that would have a significant impact to our results of operations. However, we continue to monitor economic and political trends within the global environment. The operating environment in Venezuela is discussed further in the following section.

 

Venezuela Foreign Currency Translation

 

Venezuela is a country with a highly inflationary economy under U.S. GAAP. As a result, the U.S. dollar is the functional currency for our subsidiaries in Venezuela. Any currency remeasurement adjustments for non-dollar denominated monetary assets and liabilities held by these subsidiaries and other transactional foreign exchange gains and losses are reflected in earnings. On February 8, 2013, the Venezuelan government devalued its currency, the Bolivar Fuerte, resulting in a charge of $22.7 million ($16.1 million after tax), recorded within special (gains) and charges.

 

Our ability to effectively manage sales and profit levels in Venezuela will be impacted by several factors, including our ability to mitigate the effect of any additional future devaluation, further actions of the Venezuelan government, economic conditions in Venezuela, the availability of raw materials, utilities and energy and the future state of exchange controls in Venezuela including the availability of U.S. dollars at the official foreign exchange rate. Sales and profit levels in Venezuela could also be impacted by any actions taken by the government aimed at controlling market prices. We expect that the ongoing impact related to measuring our Venezuelan statement of income at the exchange rate subsequent to the devaluation in February 2013, or future exchange rates, will not have a significant impact to our results of operations. During 2013, sales in Venezuela represented approximately 1% of our consolidated sales. Assets held in Venezuela at year end 2013 represented approximately 1% of our consolidated assets.

 

In 2013, the Venezuelan government created a new foreign exchange mechanism called the “Complimentary System of Foreign Currency Acquirement” (“SICAD”). It operates similar to an auction system and allows entities to bid for U.S. dollars to be used for specified transactions. We did not use the SICAD mechanism in 2013 nor have we made a decision if we intend to use the mechanism in the future.

 

Subsequent Events

In December 2013, subsequent to our fiscal year end for international operations, we completed the acquisition of Akzo Nobel N.V.’s Purate business. Pre-acquisition annual sales of the business are approximately $23 million.

 

In accordance with the Champion acquisition agreement, in January 2014, we made an additional payment of $86.4 million to Champion’s former stockholders as a result of increases in applicable gains and investment taxes after December 31, 2012. The amount is classified within other current liabilities as of December 31, 2013. For additional information on the Champion acquisition, see Note 4.

 

In February 2014, we repaid $100 million of term loan borrowings.

 

28



 

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

This MD&A includes financial measures that have not been calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These non-GAAP measures include:

 

·                   Fixed currency sales

·                   Adjusted sales

·                   Pro forma sales

·                   Adjusted pro forma sales

·                   Pro forma fixed currency sales

·                   Adjusted pro forma fixed currency sales

·                   Acquisition adjusted fixed currency sales

·                   Adjusted gross margin

·                   Pro forma gross margin

·                   Adjusted pro forma gross margin

·                   Pro forma SG&A ratio

·                   Fixed currency operating income

·                   Adjusted operating income

·                   Pro forma operating income

·                   Adjusted pro forma operating income

·                   Pro forma fixed currency operating income

·                   Adjusted fixed currency operating income

·                   Adjusted pro forma fixed currency operating income

·                   Acquisition adjusted fixed currency operating income

·                   Adjusted net interest expense

·                   Adjusted tax rate

·                   Adjusted net income

·                   Adjusted diluted earnings per share

 

We provide these measures as additional information regarding our operating results. We use these non-GAAP measures internally to evaluate our performance and in making financial and operational decisions, including with respect to incentive compensation. We believe that our presentation of these measures provides investors with greater transparency with respect to our results of operations and that these measures are useful for period-to-period comparison of results.

 

We include in special (gains) and charges items that are unusual in nature and significant in amount. In order to better allow investors to compare underlying business performance period-to-period, we provide adjusted sales, adjusted pro forma sales, adjusted fixed currency sales, adjusted pro forma fixed currency sales, adjusted gross margin, adjusted pro forma gross margin, adjusted operating income, adjusted fixed currency operating income, adjusted pro forma operating income, adjusted pro forma fixed currency operating income, adjusted net interest expense, adjusted net income and adjusted diluted earnings per share, which exclude special (gains) and charges and discrete tax items. The exclusion of special (gains) and charges and discrete tax items in such adjusted amounts help provide a better understanding of underlying business performance. In addition, to provide the most meaningful 2011 results of operations for statement of income data below operating income, such results have been presented excluding the 2011 post merger Nalco activity in our 2011 non-GAAP measures.

 

The adjusted tax rate measure promotes period-to-period comparability of the underlying effective tax rate because the amounts excluded do not necessarily reflect costs associated with historical trends or expected future costs.

 

We evaluate the performance of our international operations based on fixed currency rates of foreign exchange. Fixed currency sales, fixed currency operating income and adjusted fixed currency operating income measures (and the 2011 pro forma equivalent for each) eliminate the impact of exchange rate fluctuations on our sales, adjusted sales, operating income and adjusted operating income, respectively, and promote a better understanding of our underlying sales and operating income trends. Fixed currency amounts are based on translation into U.S. dollars at fixed foreign currency exchange rates established by management at the beginning of 2013.

 

Acquisition adjusted growth rates generally exclude the results of any acquired business from the first twelve months post acquisition and exclude the results of divested businesses from the twelve months prior to divestiture. Champion is an exception. Due to the rapid pace at which the business is being fully integrated within our Global Energy segment, including all customer selling activity, discrete financial data specific to the legacy Champion business is not readily available post acquisition. As such, to allow for the most meaningful period-over-period comparison, specific to the Champion transaction, Champion’s results for 2012 and the period prior to acquisition in 2013 have been included for purposes of providing acquisition adjusted growth rates.

 

In order to provide a meaningful comparison of our results of operations, where applicable, we have supplemented our 2011 historical financial data with discussion and analysis that compares reported and adjusted results for 2012 against the 2011 Merger Pro Formas. The unaudited pro forma results are based on the historical consolidated results of operations of both Ecolab and Nalco and were prepared to illustrate the effects of our merger with Nalco, assuming the merger had been consummated on January 1, 2010. The unaudited pro forma and adjusted pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have actually occurred had the merger been completed as of the date indicated, nor are they indicative of future operating results of the combined company.

 

These non-GAAP measures are not in accordance with, or an alternative to U.S. GAAP, and may be different from non-GAAP measures used by other companies. Investors should not rely on any single financial measure when evaluating our business. We recommend that investors view these measures in conjunction with the U.S. GAAP measures included in this MD&A and have provided reconciliations of reported U.S. GAAP amounts to the non-GAAP amounts.

 

29



 

Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factors

This MD&A and other portions of this Annual Report to Shareholders contain various “Forward-Looking Statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements include expectations concerning items such as:

 

·              scope, timing, costs, cash expenditures, timing of cash payments, benefits and headcount impact of our restructuring initiatives

·             utilization of recorded restructuring liabilities

·             Champion purchase price allocation adjustments

·             capital investments and stategic business acquisitions

·             share repurchases

·             impact of Venezuela currency remeasurement

·             payment of litigation settlement funds

·             payments under operating leases

·             borrowing capacity

·             global market risk

·             objective to improve credit rating

·             long-term potential of our business

·             impact of changes in exchange rates and interest rates

·             leveraging and simplifying global supply chain

·             losses due to concentration of credit risk

·             recognition of share-based compensation expense

·             future benefit plan payments

·             amortization expense

·             benefits of and synergies from the Champion and Nalco transactions

·             bad debt experiences and customer credit worthiness

·             disputes, claims and litigation

·             environmental contingencies

·             returns on pension plan assets

·             future cash flow and uses for cash

·             dividends

·             debt repayments

·             contributions to pension and postretirement healthcare plans

·             liquidity requirements and borrowing methods

·             impact of credit rating downgrade

·             impact of new accounting pronouncements

·             tax deductibility of goodwill

·             non performance of counterparties

·             timing of hedged transactions

·             income taxes, including loss carryforwards, unrecognized tax benefits and uncertain tax positions

 

Without limiting the foregoing, words or phrases such as “will likely result,” “are expected to,” “will continue,” “is anticipated,” “we believe,” “we expect,” “estimate,” “project” (including the negative or variations thereof) or similar terminology, generally identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements may also represent challenging goals for us. These statements, which represent the company’s expectations or beliefs concerning various future events, are based on current expectations that involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those of such forward-looking statements. We caution that undue reliance should not be placed on such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. Some of the factors which could cause results to differ from those expressed in any forward-looking statements are set forth under Item 1A of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, entitled Risk Factors.

 

In addition, we note that our stock price can be affected by fluctuations in quarterly earnings. There can be no assurances that our earnings levels will meet investors’ expectations. Except as may be required under applicable law, we undertake no duty to update our Forward-Looking Statements.

 

30



 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME

 

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 (MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales (including special charges of $29.6 in 2011)

 

 $

 13,253.4

 

 $

11,838.7

 

 $

6,798.5

 

Operating expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of sales (including special charges of $43.2, $93.9 and $8.9 in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively)

 

7,240.1

 

6,483.5

 

3,475.6

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

4,281.4

 

3,920.2

 

2,438.1

 

Special (gains) and charges

 

171.3

 

145.7

 

131.0

 

Operating income

 

1,560.6

 

1,289.3

 

753.8

 

Interest expense, net (including special charges of $2.5, $19.3 and $1.5 in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively)

 

262.3

 

276.7

 

74.2

 

Income before income taxes

 

1,298.3

 

1,012.6

 

679.6

 

Provision for income taxes

 

324.7

 

311.3

 

216.3

 

Net income including noncontrolling interest

 

973.6

 

701.3

 

463.3

 

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest (including special charges of $0.5 and $4.5 in 2013 and 2012, respectively)

 

5.8

 

(2.3)

 

0.8

 

Net income attributable to Ecolab

 

 $

 967.8

 

 $

703.6

 

 $

462.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings attributable to Ecolab per common share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 $

 3.23

 

 $

2.41

 

 $

1.95

 

Diluted

 

 $

 3.16

 

 $

2.35

 

 $

1.91

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends declared per common share

 

 $

 0.9650

 

 $

0.8300

 

 $

0.7250

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average common shares outstanding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

299.9

 

292.5

 

236.9

 

Diluted

 

305.9

 

298.9

 

242.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

31



 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 (MILLIONS)

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income including noncontrolling interest

 

 $

 973.6

 

 

 $

701.3

 

 

 $

463.3

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation

 

(240.0

)

 

4.8

 

 

34.0

 

Gain (loss) on net investment hedges

 

(11.4

)

 

9.8

 

 

(9.5

)

 

 

(251.4

)

 

14.6

 

 

24.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives and hedging instruments

 

7.0

 

 

(0.1

)

 

(10.2

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pension and postretirement benefits

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current period net actuarial income (loss)

 

337.2

 

 

(184.0

)

 

(113.2

)

Pension and postretirement prior period service costs and benefits adjustments

 

(1.0

)

 

21.8

 

 

2.6

 

Amortization of net actuarial loss and prior service costs included in net periodic pension and postretirement costs

 

46.7

 

 

31.0

 

 

23.3

 

 

 

382.9

 

 

(131.2

)

 

(87.3

)

Subtotal

 

138.5

 

 

(116.7

)

 

(73.0

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income, including noncontrolling interest

 

1,112.1

 

 

584.6

 

 

390.3

 

Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

(10.2

)

 

(4.2

)

 

0.8

 

Comprehensive income attributable to Ecolab

 

 $

 1,122.3

 

 

 $

588.8

 

 

 $

389.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

32



 

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

 

DECEMBER 31 (MILLIONS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 $

 339.2

 

 

 $

1,157.8

 

Accounts receivable, net

 

2,568.0

 

 

2,225.1

 

Inventories

 

1,321.9

 

 

1,088.1

 

Deferred income taxes

 

163.0

 

 

205.2

 

Other current assets

 

306.3

 

 

215.8

 

Total current assets

 

4,698.4

 

 

4,892.0

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

2,882.0

 

 

2,409.1

 

Goodwill

 

6,862.9

 

 

5,920.5

 

Other intangible assets, net

 

4,785.3

 

 

4,044.1

 

Other assets

 

407.9

 

 

306.6

 

Total assets

 

 $

 19,636.5

 

 

 $

17,572.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term debt

 

 $

 861.0

 

 

 $

805.8

 

Accounts payable

 

1,021.9

 

 

879.7

 

Compensation and benefits

 

571.1

 

 

518.8

 

Income taxes

 

80.9

 

 

77.4

 

Other current liabilities

 

953.8

 

 

771.0

 

Total current liabilities

 

3,488.7

 

 

3,052.7

 

Long-term debt

 

6,043.5

 

 

5,736.1

 

Postretirement health care and pension benefits

 

795.6

 

 

1,220.5

 

Other liabilities

 

1,899.3

 

 

1,402.9

 

Total liabilities

 

12,227.1

 

 

11,412.2

 

Equity (a)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock

 

345.1

 

 

342.1

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

4,692.0

 

 

4,249.1

 

Retained earnings

 

4,699.0

 

 

4,020.6

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

(305.2

)

 

(459.7

)

Treasury stock

 

(2,086.6

)

 

(2,075.1

)

Total Ecolab shareholders’ equity

 

7,344.3

 

 

6,077.0

 

Noncontrolling interest

 

65.1

 

 

83.1

 

Total equity

 

7,409.4

 

 

6,160.1

 

Total liabilities and equity

 

 $

 19,636.5

 

 

 $

17,572.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(a)        Common stock, 800.0 million shares authorized, $1.00 par value, 301.1 million shares outstanding at December 31, 2013, 294.7 million shares outstanding at December 31, 2012. Shares outstanding are net of treasury stock.

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

33



 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

 

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 (MILLIONS)

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income including noncontrolling interest

 

 

 $

 973.6

 

 

 $

701.3

 

 

 $

463.3

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income including noncontrolling interest to cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation

 

 

514.2

 

 

468.2

 

 

331.4

 

Amortization

 

 

302.0

 

 

246.3

 

 

64.3

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

(130.5

)

 

(3.2

)

 

41.7

 

Share-based compensation expense

 

 

69.6

 

 

65.8

 

 

39.9

 

Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements

 

 

(36.6

)

 

(50.1

)

 

(13.7

)

Pension and postretirement plan contributions

 

 

(80.0

)

 

(254.9

)

 

(156.6

)

Pension and postretirement plan expense

 

 

142.4

 

 

114.6

 

 

83.1

 

Restructuring, net of cash paid

 

 

(39.8

)

 

66.6

 

 

49.5

 

Venezuela currency devaluation

 

 

23.2

 

 

 

 

 

(Gain) loss on sale of businesses

 

 

1.9

 

 

(89.3

)

 

 

Other, net

 

 

16.4

 

 

5.6

 

 

8.9

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

(147.4

)

 

(189.7

)

 

(106.0

)

Inventories

 

 

(30.5

)

 

(2.0

)

 

(36.1

)

Other assets

 

 

(68.7

)

 

18.6

 

 

(60.2

)

Accounts payable

 

 

50.6

 

 

79.0

 

 

60.9

 

Other liabilities

 

 

(0.6

)

 

26.2

 

 

(84.9

)

Cash provided by operating activities

 

 

1,559.8

 

 

1,203.0

 

 

685.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital expenditures

 

 

(625.1

)

 

(574.5

)

 

(341.7

)

Capitalized software expenditures

 

 

(37.2

)

 

(33.0

)

 

(24.3

)

Property and other assets sold

 

 

18.1

 

 

15.9

 

 

3.0

 

Businesses acquired and investments in affiliates, net of cash acquired

 

 

(1,437.7

)

 

(43.0

)

 

(1,633.2

)

Divestiture of businesses

 

 

(8.3

)

 

130.7

 

 

 

Deposit into indemnification escrow

 

 

(10.5

)

 

(1.3

)

 

(28.1

)

Release from indemnification escrow

 

 

13.0

 

 

17.3

 

 

 

Cash used for investing activities

 

 

(2,087.7

)

 

(487.9

)

 

(2,024.3

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net issuances (repayments) of commercial paper and notes payable

 

 

(278.3

)

 

(387.3

)

 

907.1

 

Long-term debt borrowings

 

 

900.1

 

 

1,001.2

 

 

4,238.7

 

Long-term debt repayments

 

 

(511.2

)

 

(1,694.9

)

 

(1,420.4

)

Reacquired shares

 

 

(307.6

)

 

(209.9

)

 

(690.0

)

Dividends paid

 

 

(218.1

)

 

(306.8

)

 

(162.9

)

Exercise of employee stock options

 

 

97.0

 

 

163.7

 

 

89.0

 

Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements

 

 

36.6

 

 

50.1

 

 

13.7

 

Acquisition related contingent consideration

 

 

(11.3

)

 

 

 

 

Other, net

 

 

0.2

 

 

(9.7

)

 

(41.4

)

Cash provided by (used for) financing activities

 

 

(292.6

)

 

(1,393.6

)

 

2,933.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

 

1.9

 

 

(7.3

)

 

6.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

(818.6

)

 

(685.8

)

 

1,601.3

 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

 

 

1,157.8

 

 

1,843.6

 

 

242.3

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

 

 

 $

 339.2

 

 

 $

1,157.8

 

 

 $

1,843.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income taxes paid

 

 

 $

 434.2

 

 

 $

222.6

 

 

 $

224.2

 

Interest paid

 

 

258.9

 

 

279.0

 

 

71.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

34



 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY

 

 

 

ECOLAB SHAREHOLDERS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ACCUMULATED

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ADDITIONAL

 

 

 

OTHER

 

 

 

TOTAL ECOLAB

 

NON-

 

 

 

 

 

COMMON

 

PAID-IN

 

RETAINED

 

COMPREHENSIVE

 

TREASURY

 

SHAREHOLDERS’

 

CONTROLLING

 

TOTAL

 

MILLIONS

 

STOCK

 

CAPITAL

 

EARNINGS

 

INCOME (LOSS)

 

STOCK

 

EQUITY

 

INTEREST

 

EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance December 31, 2010

 

$

333.1

 

$

1,310.2

 

$

3,279.1

 

$

(271.9

)

$

(2,521.3

)

 

$       2,129.2

 

$

3.8

 

$

2,133.0

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

462.5

 

 

 

 

 

462.5

 

0.8

 

463.3

 

Comprehensive income (loss) activity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(73.0

)

 

 

 

(73.0

)

 

 

(73.0

)

Total comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

389.5

 

0.8

 

390.3

 

Cash dividends declared

 

 

 

 

 

(181.7

)

 

 

 

 

(181.7

)

(0.6

)

(182.3

)

Nalco merger

 

 

 

2,573.2

 

 

 

 

 

1,300.0

 

3,873.2

 

70.4

 

3,943.6

 

Stock options and awards

 

3.0

 

142.1

 

 

 

 

 

1.4

 

146.5

 

 

 

146.5

 

Reacquired shares

 

 

 

(44.7

)

 

 

 

 

(645.3

)

(690.0

)

 

 

(690.0

)

Balance December 31, 2011

 

336.1

 

3,980.8

 

3,559.9

 

(344.9

)

(1,865.2

)

5,666.7

 

74.4

 

5,741.1

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

703.6

 

 

 

 

 

703.6

 

(2.3

)

701.3

 

Comprehensive income (loss) activity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(114.8

)

 

 

 

(114.8

)

(1.9

)

(116.7

)

Total comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

588.8

 

(4.2

)

584.6

 

Cash dividends declared

 

 

 

 

 

(242.9

)

 

 

 

 

(242.9

)

(3.9

)

(246.8

)

Nalco merger

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.3

 

16.8

 

17.1

 

Stock options and awards

 

6.0

 

260.7

 

 

 

 

 

7.3

 

274.0

 

 

 

274.0

 

Reacquired shares

 

 

 

7.3

 

 

 

 

 

(217.2

)

(209.9

)

 

 

(209.9

)

Balance December 31, 2012

 

342.1

 

4,249.1

 

4,020.6

 

(459.7

)

(2,075.1

)

6,077.0

 

83.1

 

6,160.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

967.8

 

 

 

 

 

967.8

 

5.8

 

973.6

 

Comprehensive income (loss) activity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

154.5

 

 

 

 

154.5

 

(16.0

)

138.5

 

Total comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,122.3

 

(10.2

)

1,112.1

 

Cash dividends declared

 

 

 

 

 

(289.4

)

 

 

 

 

(289.4

)

(11.4

)

(300.8

)

Champion acquisition

 

 

 

258.1

 

 

 

 

 

284.9

 

543.0

 

3.6

 

546.6

 

Stock options and awards

 

3.0

 

184.8

 

 

 

 

 

11.2

 

199.0

 

 

 

199.0

 

Reacquired shares

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(307.6

)

(307.6

)

 

 

(307.6

)

Balance December 31, 2013

 

$

345.1

 

$

4,692.0

 

$

4,699.0

 

$

(305.2

)

$

(2,086.6

)

 

$       7,344.3

 

$

65.1

 

$

7,409.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COMMON STOCK ACTIVITY

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31

 

COMMON

 

TREASURY

 

COMMON

 

TREASURY

 

COMMON

 

TREASURY

 

(SHARES)

 

STOCK

 

STOCK

 

STOCK

 

STOCK

 

STOCK

 

STOCK

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shares, beginning of year

 

342,106,581

 

(47,384,557

)

336,088,243

 

(44,113,799

)

333,141,410

 

(100,628,659

)

Stock options, shares

 

2,206,661

 

254,680

 

5,430,997

 

208,239

 

2,946,833

 

93,771

 

Stock awards, net issuances

 

787,767

 

11,008

 

587,341

 

(21,257

)

 

 

114,064

 

Champion acquisition

 

 

 

6,596,444

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nalco merger

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

68,316,283

 

Reacquired shares

 

 

 

(3,443,405

)

 

 

(3,457,740

)

 

 

(12,009,258

)

Shares, end of year

 

345,101,009

 

(43,965,830

)

342,106,581

 

(47,384,557

)

336,088,243

 

(44,113,799

)

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

35



 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

1. NATURE OF BUSINESS

 

 

Ecolab Inc. (“Ecolab” or “the company”) is the global leader in water, hygiene and energy technologies and services that protect people and vital resources. The company delivers comprehensive programs and services to promote safe food, maintain clean environments, optimize water and energy use and improve operational efficiencies for customers in the food, energy, healthcare, industrial and hospitality markets in more than 170 countries.

 

The company’s cleaning and sanitizing programs and products, pest elimination services, and equipment maintenance and repair services support customers in the foodservice, food and beverage processing, hospitality, healthcare, government and education, retail, textile care and commercial facilities management sectors. The company’s chemicals and technologies are also used in water treatment, pollution control, energy conservation, oil production and refining, steelmaking, papermaking, mining and other industrial processes.

 

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

 

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the company and all subsidiaries in which the company has a controlling financial interest. Investments in companies, joint ventures or partnerships in which the company does not have control, but has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies, are reported using the equity method. International subsidiaries are included in the financial statements on the basis of their U.S. GAAP November 30 fiscal year-ends to facilitate the timely inclusion of such entities in the company’s consolidated financial reporting. All intercompany transactions and profits are eliminated in consolidation.

 

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the company’s financial statements requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The company’s critical accounting estimates include revenue recognition, valuation allowances and accrued liabilities, actuarially determined liabilities, restructuring, income taxes and long-lived assets, intangible assets and goodwill.

 

Foreign Currency Translation

Financial position and reported results of operations of the company’s international subsidiaries are measured using local currencies as the functional currency. Assets and liabilities of these operations are translated at the exchange rates in effect at each fiscal year end. The translation adjustments related to assets and liabilities that arise from the use of differing exchange rates from period to period are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in shareholders’ equity. Income statement accounts are translated at average rates of exchange prevailing during the year. The company evaluates its International operations based on fixed rates of exchange; however, the different exchange rates from period to period impact the amount of reported income from consolidated operations. The foreign currency fluctuations of any foreign subsidiaries that operate in highly inflationary environments are included in results of operations.

 

Concentration of Credit Risk

Credit risk represents the accounting loss that would be recognized at the reporting date if counterparties failed to perform as contracted. The company believes the likelihood of incurring material losses due to concentration of credit risk is remote. The principal financial instruments subject to credit risk are as follows:

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents - The company maintains cash deposits with major banks, which from time to time may exceed insured limits. The possibility of loss related to financial condition of major banks has been deemed minimal. Additionally, the company’s investment policy limits exposure to concentrations of credit risk and changes in market conditions.

 

Accounts Receivable - A large number of customers in diverse industries and geographies, as well as the practice of establishing reasonable credit lines, limits credit risk. Based on historical trends and experiences, the allowance for doubtful accounts is adequate to cover potential credit risk losses.

 

Foreign Currency Contracts and Derivatives - Exposure to credit risk is limited by internal policies and active monitoring of counterparty risks. In addition, the company selects a diversified group of major international banks and financial institutions as counterparties. The company does not anticipate nonperformance by any of these counterparties.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents include highly-liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. The company’s cash and cash equivalents balance as of December 31, 2012 was comparably higher than its December 31, 2013 balance. The increased balance as of year end 2012 was due primarily to a buildup in cash in anticipation of the Champion acquisition which was completed in April 2013.

 

Accounts Receivable and Allowance For Doubtful Accounts

Accounts receivable are carried at their face amounts less an allowance for doubtful accounts. Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and generally do not bear interest. The company estimates the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts by analyzing accounts receivable balances by age and applying historical write-off and collection trend rates. The company’s estimates include separately providing for customer balances based on specific circumstances and credit conditions, and when it is deemed probable that the balance is uncollectible. Account balances are charged off against the allowance when it is determined the receivable will not be recovered.

 

The company’s allowance for doubtful accounts balance also includes an allowance for the expected return of products shipped and credits related to pricing or quantities shipped of approximately $14 million, $13 million and $12 million as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Returns and credit activity is recorded directly to sales.

 

The following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts:

 

MILLIONS

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

Beginning balance

 

$

73

 

 

$

49

 

$

45

 

Bad debt expense

 

28

 

 

37

 

15

 

Write-offs

 

(21

)

 

(13

)

(16

)

Other (a)

 

1

 

 

 

5

 

Ending balance

 

$

81

 

 

$

73

 

$

49

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(a)

Other amounts are primarily the effects of changes in currency translations and the impact of allowance for returns and credits.

 

36



 

Inventory Valuations

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Certain U.S. inventory costs are determined on a last-in, first-out (LIFO) basis. LIFO inventories represented 34% and 31% of consolidated inventories as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. All other inventory costs are determined using either the average cost or first-in, first-out (FIFO) methods. Inventory values at FIFO, as shown in Note 5, approximate replacement cost.

 

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Merchandising and customer equipment consists principally of various systems that dispense the company’s cleaning and sanitizing products, dishwashing machines and process control and monitoring equipment. Certain dispensing systems capitalized by the company are accounted for on a mass asset basis, whereby equipment is capitalized and depreciated as a group and written off when fully depreciated. The company capitalizes both internal and external costs of development or purchase of computer software for internal use. Costs incurred for data conversion, training and maintenance associated with capitalized software are expensed as incurred. Expenditures for major renewals and improvements, which significantly extend the useful lives of existing plant and equipment, are capitalized and depreciated. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. Upon retirement or disposition of plant and equipment, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is recognized in income.

 

Depreciation is charged to operations using the straight-line method over the assets’ estimated useful lives ranging from 5 to 40 years for buildings and leasehold improvements, 3 to 18 years for machinery and equipment and 3 to 10 years for merchandising and customer equipment and capitalized software. Total depreciation expense was $514 million, $468 million and $331 million for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

 

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

 

Goodwill

 

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired. The company’s reporting units are its operating segments, which subsequent to the change in the company’s organizational model during the first quarter of 2013 are discussed below.

 

During the second quarter of 2013, the company completed its annual test for goodwill impairment. The company used a “step zero” qualitative test to assess eight of its ten reporting units. Qualitative testing evaluated factors including, but not limited to, economic, market and industry conditions, cost factors and the overall financial performance of the reporting unit. The estimated fair values for seven of the eight reporting units using “step zero” testing substantially exceeded their respective carrying values. While Global Energy had approximately 30% headroom due to the recent acquisition of Champion, the company considered “step zero” analysis to be sufficient due to continued strong qualitative indicators. Global Energy’s headroom before the Champion acquisition continued to increase since the prior year assessment. Based on the “step zero” analysis performed, the company noted no changes in events or circumstances which would have required the completion of the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment analysis for any of the assessed reporting units.

 

The company elected to utilize a “step one” quantitative test for Global Water and Global Paper given the lower headroom between fair value and carrying value at the previous year’s annual impairment test. These reporting units had lower headroom as they were acquired as part of the Nalco merger in December 2011. The headroom for these reporting units has continued to increase since the prior year assessment. Based on the “step one” testing performed, no impairment of goodwill was indicated, and the fair value for both reporting units now substantially exceed their respective carrying values.

 

If circumstances change significantly, the company would also test a reporting unit’s goodwill for impairment during interim periods between its annual tests. Based on the current performance of the company’s reporting units, updating the impairment testing during the second half of 2013 was not deemed necessary. There has been no impairment of goodwill since the adoption FASB guidance for goodwill and other intangibles on January 1, 2002.

 

The Nalco and Champion transactions resulted in the addition of $4.5 billion and $1.0 billion of goodwill, respectively. Subsequent performance of the reporting units holding the additional goodwill relative to projections used for the purchase price allocation of goodwill could result in an impairment if there is either underperformance by the reporting unit or if the carrying value of the reporting unit were to fluctuate significantly due to reasons that did not proportionately change fair value.

 

During 2012, the company added $23.2 million to goodwill through acquisitions completed in 2012 and $53.0 million through adjustments to Nalco’s initial fair value calculation. None of the goodwill acquired in 2012 is expected to be tax deductible. The company disposed $17.1 million of goodwill through the sale of its Vehicle Care division. Further details on the company’s acquisitions and dispositions are included in Note 4. The effect of foreign currency added $6.1 million to goodwill during 2012.

 

Effective in the first quarter of 2013, the company changed its reportable segments due to a change in its underlying organizational model designed to support the business following the Nalco merger and to facilitate global growth. The company did not operate under the realigned segment structure prior to 2013. The company’s new segment structure focuses on global businesses, with its ten operating units, which are also operating segments, aggregated into four reportable segments as follows:

 

·   Global Industrial consists of the Global Water, Global Food & Beverage, Global Paper and Global Textile Care operating units.

 

·   Global Institutional consists of the Global Institutional, Global Specialty and Global Healthcare operating units.

 

·   Global Energy consists of the Global Energy operating unit.

 

·   Other consists of the Global Pest Elimination and Equipment Care operating units.

 

Based on the changes in the company’s organizational model, the company has updated its goodwill allocation for December 31, 2012. The company finalized the allocation during the second quarter of 2013. No impairments were noted in connection with the goodwill allocation procedures performed.

 

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill, under the organizational model implemented during the first quarter of 2013, for each of the company’s reportable segments are shown in the following table. As the company did not operate under the realigned reportable segment structure prior to 2013, goodwill activity by reportable segment prior to 2013 has not been provided.

 

37



 

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for each of the company’s reportable segments are as follows:

 

 

 

GLOBAL

 

GLOBAL

 

GLOBAL

 

 

 

 

 

MILLIONS

 

INDUSTRIAL

 

INSTITUTIONAL

 

ENERGY

 

OTHER

 

TOTAL

 

December 31, 2012

 

$

2,751.6

 

$

720.6

 

$

2,325.3

 

$

123.0

 

$

5,920.5

 

Current year business acquisitions (a)

 

33.9

 

 

1,037.9

 

 

1,071.8

 

Business divestiture

 

(2.1

)

 

 

 

(2.1

)

Effect of foreign currency translation

 

(53.9

)

(14.0

)

(57.0

)

(2.4

)

(127.3

)

December 31, 2013

 

$

2,729.5

 

$

706.6

 

$

3,306.2

 

$

120.6

 

$

6,862.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(a)

For 2013, none of the goodwill acquired is expected to be tax deductible.

 

Other Intangible Assets

 

As part of the Nalco merger, the company added the “Nalco” trade name as an indefinite life intangible asset. During the second quarter of 2013, using the qualitative assessment method, the company completed its annual test for indefinite life intangible asset impairment. Based on this testing, no adjustment to the $1.2 billion carrying value of this asset was necessary. Additionally, based on the ongoing performance of its operating units, updating the impairment testing during the second half of 2013 was not deemed necessary. There has been no impairment of the Nalco trade name intangible asset since it was acquired.

 

Other intangible assets subject to amortization primarily include customer relationships, trademarks, patents and other technology. The fair value of identifiable intangible assets is estimated based upon discounted future cash flow projections and other acceptable valuation methods. Other intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated economic lives. The weighted-average useful life of other intangible assets was 14 years as of December 31, 2013 and 2012.

 

The weighted-average useful life by type of amortizable asset at December 31, 2013 is as follows:

 

NUMBER OF YEARS

 

Customer relationships

 

14

Trademarks

 

15

Patents

 

14

Other technology

 

8

 

The straight-line method of amortization reflects an appropriate allocation of the cost of the intangible assets to earnings in proportion to the amount of economic benefits obtained by the company in each reporting period. The company evaluates the remaining useful life of its intangible assets that are being amortized each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a change to the remaining period of amortization. If the estimate of an intangible asset’s remaining useful life is changed, the remaining carrying amount of the intangible asset will be amortized prospectively over that revised remaining useful life. Total amortization expense related to other intangible assets during the last three years and future estimated amortization is as follows:

 

MILLIONS

 

2011

 

$

 62

2012

 

237

2013

 

293

2014

 

304

2015

 

301

2016

 

297

2017

 

293

2018

 

287

 

The increase in amortization from 2011 to 2013 is due primarily to the amortizable intangible assets acquired through the Nalco and Champion transactions.

 

Long-Lived Assets

The company periodically reviews its long-lived and amortizable intangible assets for impairment and assesses whether significant events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. Such circumstances may include a significant decrease in the market price of an asset, a significant adverse change in the manner in which the asset is being used or in its physical condition or history of operating or cash flow losses associated with the use of an asset. An impairment loss may be recognized when the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the anticipated future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. The amount of the impairment loss to be recorded, if any, is calculated by the excess of the asset’s carrying value over its fair value. In addition, the company periodically reassesses the estimated remaining useful lives of its long-lived assets. Changes to estimated useful lives would impact the amount of depreciation and amortization recorded in earnings. The company has not experienced significant changes in the carrying value or estimated remaining useful lives of its long-lived or amortizable intangible assets.

 

38



 

Asset Retirement Obligations

The fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets is recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The liability is adjusted to its present value in subsequent periods as accretion expense is recorded. The corresponding asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset and depreciated over the asset’s useful life. The company’s asset retirement obligation liability was $10.5 million and $13.0 million, respectively, at December 31, 2013 and 2012.

 

Income Taxes

Income taxes are recognized during the period in which transactions enter into the determination of financial statement income, with deferred income taxes being provided for the tax effect of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. The company records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets when uncertainty regarding their realizability exists. Deferred income taxes are provided on the undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries except to the extent such earnings are considered to be permanently reinvested in the subsidiary.

 

The company records liabilities for income tax uncertainties in accordance with the recognition and measurement criteria prescribed in authoritative guidance issued by the FASB.

 

Restructuring Activities

The company incurs net costs for restructuring activities associated with plans to enhance its efficiency and effectiveness and sharpen its competitiveness. These restructuring plans include net costs associated with significant actions involving employee-related severance charges, contract termination costs and asset write-downs and disposals. Employee termination costs are largely based on policies and severance plans, and include personnel reductions and related costs for severance, benefits and outplacement services. These charges are reflected in the quarter in which the actions are probable and the amounts are estimable, which is generally when management approves the associated actions. Contract termination costs include charges to terminate leases prior to the end of their respective terms and other contract termination costs. Asset write-downs and disposals include leasehold improvement write-downs, other asset write-downs associated with combining operations and disposal of assets.

 

Revenue Recognition

The company recognizes revenue on product sales at the time evidence of an arrangement exists, title to the product and risk of loss transfers to the customer, the price is fixed and determinable and collection is reasonably assured. The company recognizes revenue on services as they are performed. While the company employs a sales and service team to ensure customer’s needs are best met in a high quality way, the vast majority of the company’s revenue is generated from product sales. Outside of the service businesses discussed in Note 17, any other services are either incidental to a product sale and not sold separately, or insignificant.

 

The company’s sales policies do not provide for general rights of return. Critical estimates used in recognizing revenue include the delay between the time that products are shipped, when they are received by customers, when title transfers and the amount of credit memos issued in subsequent periods. The company records estimated reductions to revenue for customer programs and incentive offerings, including pricing arrangements, promotions and other volume-based incentives at the time the sale is recorded. The company also records estimated reserves for anticipated uncollectible accounts and for product returns and credits at the time of sale. Depending on market conditions, the company may increase customer incentive offerings, which could reduce gross profit margins at the time the incentive is offered.

 

Share-Based Compensation

The company measures compensation expense for share-based awards at fair value at the date of grant and recognizes compensation expense over the service period for awards expected to vest. The majority of grants to retirement eligible recipients (age 55 with required years of service) are attributed to expense using the non-substantive vesting method and are fully expensed over a six month period following the date of grant. In addition, the company includes a forfeiture estimate in the amount of compensation expense being recognized based on an estimate of the number of outstanding awards expected to vest.

 

Earnings Per Common Share

The computations of the basic and diluted earnings attributable to Ecolab per share amounts were as follows:

 

MILLIONS
EXCEPT PER SHARE

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

Net income attributable to Ecolab

 

$

 967.8

 

$

703.6

 

$

462.5

 

Weighted-average common shares outstanding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

299.9

 

292.5

 

236.9

 

Effect of dilutive stock options, units and awards

 

6.0

 

6.4

 

5.2

 

Diluted

 

305.9

 

298.9

 

242.1

 

Earnings attributable to Ecolab per common share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

 3.23

 

$

2.41

 

$

1.95

 

Diluted

 

$

 3.16

 

$

2.35

 

$

1.91

 

Anti-dilutive securities excluded from the computation of earnings per share

 

1.8

 

2.6

 

4.7

 

 

Derivative Instruments and Hedging

The company uses foreign currency forward contracts, interest rate swaps and foreign currency debt to manage risks generally associated with foreign exchange rates, interest rates and net investments in foreign operations. The company does not hold derivative financial instruments of a speculative nature or for trading purposes.

 

All of the company’s derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at their fair value. The earnings impact resulting from the change in fair value of the derivative instruments is recorded in the same line item in the consolidated statement of income as the underlying exposure being hedged.

 

New Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2011, the FASB issued a final standard on balance sheet offsetting disclosures. A clarification in the scope of the final standard was issued in January 2013 and requires disclosures to provide information to help reconcile differences in the offsetting requirements under U.S. GAAP and IFRS. The company adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2013. See Note 8 for applicable disclosures.

 

In July 2012, the FASB amended its guidance on testing of indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment. Under the amended guidance, companies may perform a qualitative assessment to determine

 

39



 

whether further impairment testing is necessary. The guidance for indefinite-lived intangible assets is effective for annual and interim tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012, with an option for early adoption. The company applied the amended guidance to the impairment testing of indefinite life intangible assets during the second quarter of 2013. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the company’s financial statements.

 

In February 2013, the FASB issued a final standard on the reporting of amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The guidance was issued to improve the reporting of reclassifications out of AOCI. The company adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2013. See Note 9 for applicable disclosures.

 

In March 2013, the FASB issued a final standard to resolve diversity in practice regarding the release of the cumulative translation adjustment into net income when a parent either sells a part or all of its investments in a foreign entity. In addition, the standard resolves diversity in practice for the treatment of business combinations achieved in stages involving a foreign entity. The guidance is effective prospectively for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2013. Upon adoption the company does not expect a significant impact to future financial statements.

 

No other new accounting pronouncements issued or effective have had or are expected to have a material impact on the company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

3. SPECIAL (GAINS) AND CHARGES

 

 

Special (gains) and charges reported on the Consolidated Statement of Income included the following:

 

MILLIONS

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer agreement modification

 

 $

 

 

$

 

$

29.6

 

Cost of sales

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restructuring charges

 

6.6

 

 

22.7

 

5.3

 

Recognition of Champion inventory fair value step-up

 

36.6

 

 

 

 

Recognition of Nalco inventory fair value step-up

 

 

 

71.2

 

3.6

 

Subtotal

 

43.2

 

 

93.9

 

8.9

 

Special (gains) and charges

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restructuring charges

 

83.4

 

 

116.6

 

69.0

 

Champion acquisition and integration costs

 

49.7

 

 

18.3

 

 

Nalco merger and integration costs

 

18.6

 

 

70.9

 

57.7

 

Venezuela currency devaluation

 

23.2

 

 

 

 

Gain on sale of businesses, litigation related charges and other

 

(3.6

)

 

(60.1

)

4.3

 

Subtotal

 

171.3

 

 

145.7

 

131.0

 

Operating income subtotal

 

214.5

 

 

239.6

 

169.5

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition debt costs

 

2.5

 

 

1.1

 

1.5

 

Debt extinguishment costs

 

 

 

18.2

 

 

Subtotal

 

2.5

 

 

19.3

 

1.5

 

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Venezuela currency devaluation

 

(0.5

)

 

 

 

Recognition of Nalco inventory fair value step-up

 

 

 

(4.5

)

 

Subtotal

 

(0.5

)

 

(4.5

)

 

Total special (gains) and charges

 

 $

216.5

 

 

$

254.4

 

$

171.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For segment reporting purposes, special (gains) and charges are included in the Corporate segment, which is consistent with the company’s internal management reporting.

 

Restructuring charges

 

Restructuring charges have been included as a component of both cost of sales and special (gains) and charges on the Consolidated Statement of Income. Amounts included as a component of cost of sales include supply chain related severance and other asset write-downs associated with combining operations. Restructuring liabilities have been classified as a component of both other current and other noncurrent liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

 

Energy Restructuring Plan

 

In April 2013, following the completion of the acquisition of Champion, the company commenced plans to undertake restructuring and other cost-saving actions to realize its acquisition related cost synergies as well as streamline and strengthen Ecolab’s position in the fast growing global energy market (the “Energy Restructuring Plan”). Actions associated with the acquisition to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the business include a reduction of the combined business’s current global workforce by approximately 500 positions. A number of these reductions are expected to be achieved through eliminating open positions and attrition. The company also anticipates leveraging and simplifying its global supply chain, including the reduction of plant and distribution center locations and product line optimization, as well as the reduction of other redundant facilities.

 

The pre-tax restructuring charges under the Energy Restructuring Plan are expected to be approximately $80 million ($55 million after tax). The restructuring is expected to be completed by the end of 2015. The company anticipates that approximately $60 million of the $80 million pre-tax charges will represent cash expenditures. The remaining pre-tax charges represent estimated asset write-downs and disposals. No decisions have been made for any remaining asset disposals and estimates could vary depending on the actual actions taken.

 

As a result of activities under the Energy Restructuring Plan, the company recorded restructuring charges of $27.4 million ($19.4 million after tax) during 2013.

 

Restructuring charges and activity related to the Energy Restructuring Plan since inception of the underlying actions include the following:

 

 

 

Energy Restructuring Plan

 

 

 

EMPLOYEE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TERMINATION

 

ASSET

 

 

 

 

 

MILLIONS

 

COSTS

 

DISPOSALS

 

OTHER

 

TOTAL

 

2013 Activity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recorded expense and accrual

 

$

22.9

 

$

3.6

 

$

0.9

 

$

27.4

 

Cash payments

 

(16.7

)

 

(0.8

)

(17.5

)

Non-cash charges

 

 

(3.6

)

 

(3.6

)

Effect of foreign currency translation

 

0.6

 

 

 

0.6

 

Restructuring liability

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2013

 

$

6.8

 

$

 

$

0.1

 

$

6.9

 

 

Cash payments under the Energy Restructuring Plan during 2013 were $17.5 million. The majority of cash payments under this Plan are related to severance, with the current accrual expected to be paid over the next twelve months.

 

Combined Restructuring Plan

 

In February 2011, the company commenced a comprehensive plan to substantially improve the efficiency and effectiveness of its European business, sharpen its competitiveness and accelerate its growth and profitability. Additionally, restructuring has been and will continue to be undertaken outside of Europe (collectively, the “2011 Restructuring Plan”). Total anticipated charges from this Plan from 2011 through 2013 were expected to be $150 million ($125 million after tax). Through 2012, $134 million of charges ($100 million after tax) were incurred.

 

40



 

In January 2012, following the merger with Nalco, the company formally commenced plans to undertake restructuring actions related to the reduction of its global workforce and optimization of its supply chain and office facilities, including planned reductions of plant and distribution center locations (the “Merger Restructuring Plan”). Total anticipated charges from 2012 through 2013 were expected to be $180 million ($120 million after tax), under this Plan. Through 2012, $80 million of charges ($59 million after tax) were incurred.

 

During the first quarter of 2013, as the company considered opportunities to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of its operations, it determined that because the objectives of the plans discussed above were aligned, the previously separate restructuring plans should be combined into one plan.

 

The combined restructuring plan (the “Combined Plan”) combines opportunities and initiatives from both plans and continues to follow the original format of the Merger Restructuring Plan by focusing on global actions related to optimization of the supply chain and office facilities, including reductions of plant and distribution center locations and the global workforce. After combining the plans and through the completion of the Combined Plan, the company expects to incur total pretax restructuring charges of approximately $100 million ($70 million after tax), of which $63.6 million ($48.3 million after tax) was incurred in 2013, with the remaining expected to be substantially incurred in 2014.

 

The company anticipates that substantially all of the remaining Combined Plan pre-tax charges will represent net cash expenditures.

 

Restructuring charges and activity related to the Combined Plan since inception of the underlying actions include the following:

 

 

 

Combined Plan

 

 

 

EMPLOYEE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TERMINATION

 

ASSET

 

 

 

 

 

MILLIONS

 

COSTS

 

DISPOSALS

 

OTHER

 

TOTAL

 

2011 Activity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recorded expense and accrual

 

$

67.1

 

$

0.5

 

$

7.1

 

$ 74.7

 

Cash payments

 

(22.5)

 

 

(2.6)

 

(25.1)

 

Non-cash charges

 

 

(0.5)

 

 

(0.5)

 

Effect of foreign currency translation

 

(2.2)

 

 

 

(2.2)

 

Restructuring liability December 31, 2011

 

42.4

 

 

4.5

 

46.9

 

2012 Activity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recorded expense and accrual

 

126.1

 

3.2

 

10.1

 

139.4

 

Cash payments

 

(62.0)

 

 

(3.3)

 

(65.3)

 

Non-cash charges

 

 

(3.2)

 

(3.9)

 

(7.1)

 

Effect of foreign currency translation

 

(0.7)

 

 

 

(0.7)

 

Restructuring liability December 31, 2012

 

105.8

 

 

7.4

 

113.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013 Activity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recorded expense and accrual

 

 

55.0

 

(4.9)

 

13.5

 

63.6

 

 

Net cash payments

 

 

(97.7)

 

9.1

 

(13.2)

 

(101.8)

 

 

Non-cash charges

 

 

 

(4.2)

 

(0.4)

 

(4.6)

 

 

Effect of foreign currency translation

 

 

2.8

 

 

 

2.8

 

 

Restructuring liability December 31, 2013

 

 

$

65.9

 

$

 

$

7.3

 

$ 73.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asset disposals for 2013 include gains of $7.4 million from the sales of facilities during the second half of 2013.

 

Net cash payments under the Combined Plan were $101.8 million, $65.3 million and $25.1 million for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The majority of cash payments under the Combined Plan are related to severance, with the current accrual expected to be paid over a period of a few months to several quarters.

 

Nalco Restructuring Plan

 

Prior to the Nalco merger, Nalco conducted various restructuring programs to redesign and optimize its business and work processes (the “Nalco Restructuring Plan”). As part of the Nalco merger, Ecolab assumed the Nalco Restructuring Plan liability balance of $10.6 million, which was primarily related to accrued severance and termination benefits. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the remaining liability balance related to the Nalco Restructuring Plan was $1.1 million and $3.4 million, respectively. Cash payments during 2013 and 2012 related to this Plan were $1.3 million and $7.4 million, respectively. The company expects to substantially utilize the remaining liability by the end of 2014.

 

Non-restructuring special (gains) and charges

 

Champion acquisition costs

 

As a result of the company’s efforts to acquire Champion and the resulting post acquisition integration costs, the company incurred charges of $88.8 million ($61.4 million after tax) and $19.4 million ($16.7 million after tax), during 2013 and 2012, respectively.

 

Champion acquisition and integration related costs have been included as a component of cost of sales, special (gains) and charges and net interest expense on the Consolidated Statement of Income. Amounts within cost of sales include the recognition of fair value step-up in Champion international inventory, which is maintained on a FIFO basis, and Champion U.S. inventory which is associated with the adoption of LIFO and integration into an existing LIFO pool. Amounts included in special (gains) and charges include acquisition costs, advisory and legal fees and integration charges. Amounts included in net interest expense include the interest expense through the April 2013 close date of the Champion transaction of the company’s $500 million public debt issuance in December 2012 as well as fees to secure term loans and short-term debt, all of which were initiated to fund the Champion acquisition. Further information related to the Champion acquisition is included in Note 4.

 

Nalco merger and integration costs

 

As a result of the Nalco merger completed in 2011 the company incurred charges of $18.6 million ($14.2 million after tax), $155.8 million ($113.7 million after tax) and $62.8 million ($45.6 million after tax), during 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

 

Nalco merger and integration charges have been included as a component of cost of sales, special (gains) and charges, net interest expense and net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest on the Consolidated Statement of Income. Amounts included in cost of sales and net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest include recognition of fair value step-up in Nalco international inventory which is maintained on a FIFO basis. Amounts included in special (gains) and charges include merger and integration charges, closing costs and advisory fees. Amounts included in net interest expense include a loss on the extinguishment of Nalco’s senior notes, which were assumed as part of the merger, and fees to secure short-term credit facilities to initially fund the Nalco merger. Further information related to the Nalco merger is included in Note 4.

 

41



 

Venezuelan currency devaluation

 

On February 8, 2013, the Venezuelan government devalued its currency, the Bolivar Fuerte. As a result of the devaluation, during 2013, the company recorded a charge of $22.7 million ($16.1 million after tax), due to the remeasurement of the local balance sheet. As a result of the ownership structure in place in Venezuela, the company also reflected the impact of the devaluation as a component of net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest on the Consolidated Statement of Income.

 

Other special (gains) and charges

 

During 2012, the company recorded a net gain of $60.1 million ($35.7 million after tax) related to the sale of its Vehicle Care division, the receipt of additional payments related to the sale of an investment in a U.S. business, originally sold prior to 2012 and litigation related charges.

 

In the fourth quarter of 2011, the company modified a long-term customer agreement that was assumed as part of a previous acquisition. The impact of the modification was included in net sales on the Consolidated Statement of Income, resulting in a sales reduction of $29.6 million ($18.4 million after tax).

 

In the first quarter of 2011, the company completed the purchase of the assets of the Cleantec business of Campbell Brothers Ltd., Brisbane, Queensland, Australia (“Cleantec”). Special (gains) and charges in 2011 included acquisition integration costs incurred to optimize the Cleantec business structure. Further details related to the Cleantec acquisition are included in Note 4.

 

4. ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS

 

 

Acquisitions

 

Ecolab makes acquisitions that align with the company’s strategic business objectives. The assets and liabilities of the acquired entities have been recorded as of the acquisition date, at their respective fair values, and consolidated with the company. The purchase price allocation is based on estimates of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The results of operations related to each acquired entity have been included in the results of the company from the date each entity was acquired. The aggregate purchase price of acquisitions has been reduced for any cash or cash equivalents acquired with the acquisition.

 

Champion Acquisition

 

In October 2012, the company entered into an agreement and plan of merger to acquire Champion. Based in Houston, Texas, Champion is a global energy specialty products and services company delivering its offerings to the oil and gas industry.

 

In November 2012, the company amended the acquisition agreement to provide that Champion’s downstream business would not be acquired by the company. Further, in April 2013, the company entered into a consent agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice under which the company agreed to take certain steps designed to ensure continued independent competition utilizing Champion technology for certain U.S. deepwater Gulf of Mexico products and services. The amendment and consent agreement discussed above did not significantly impact the value of the acquisition transaction. On April 10, 2013, the company completed its acquisition of Champion. Champion’s sales for the business acquired by the company were approximately $1.3 billion in 2012. The business became part of the company’s Global Energy reportable segment in the second quarter of 2013.

 

Pursuant to the terms of the acquisition agreement, the consideration transferred as of December 31, 2013 to acquire all of Champion’s stock was as follows:

 

MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE

 

Cash consideration

 

$

1,425.3

 

 

Stock consideration

 

 

 

 

 

Ecolab shares issued at closing

 

 

6.6

 

 

Ecolab’s closing stock price on April 10, 2013

 

$

82.31

 

 

Total fair value of stock consideration

 

$

543.0

 

 

Total fair value of cash and stock consideration

 

$

1,968.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The company deposited approximately $100 million of the above stock consideration in an escrow account to fund post-closing adjustments to the consideration and covenant and other indemnification obligations of the acquired entity’s former stockholders for a period of two years following the effective date of the acquisition.

 

The company incurred certain acquisition and integration costs associated with the transaction that were expensed as incurred and are reflected in the Consolidated Statement of Income. A total of $88.8 million and $19.4 million was incurred during 2013 and 2012, respectively. Amounts included in cost of sales are related to recognition of fair value step-up in Champion international inventory, which is maintained on a FIFO basis, and Champion U.S. inventory which is associated with the adoption of LIFO and integration into an existing LIFO pool. Amounts included in special (gains) and charges are related to acquisition costs, advisory and legal fees and integration costs. Amounts included in net interest expense are related to interest expense through the close date of the Champion transaction of the company’s $500 million public debt issuance in December 2012 as well as fees to secure term loans and short-term debt.

 

The company funded the initial cash component of the merger consideration through a $900 million unsecured term loan, initiated in April 2013, the proceeds from the December 2012 issuance of $500 million 1.450% senior notes and commercial paper borrowings backed by its syndicated credit facility. See Note 6 for further discussion on the company’s debt.

 

The Champion acquisition has been accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting, which requires, among other things, that most assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recognized at fair value as of the acquisition date. Certain estimated values are not yet finalized and are subject to change, which could be significant.

 

The company has finalized the majority of the purchase price allocation adjustments as of December 31, 2013. Amounts for certain contingent liabilities, certain deferred tax assets and liabilities, income tax uncertainties, certain property, plant and equipment valuations, an estimated indemnification receivable, and goodwill remain subject to change. The company will finalize the amounts recognized as information necessary to complete the analysis is obtained. The company expects to finalize remaining purchase price allocation adjustments no later than one year from the acquisition date.

 

42



 

The following table summarizes the value of Champion assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date. Also summarized in the table, subsequent to the acquisition, net adjustments of $37.1 million have been made to the preliminary purchase price allocation of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, with a corresponding adjustment to goodwill.

 

 

 

PRELIMINARY

 

2013

 

 

UPDATED

 

 

 

 

ALLOCATION

 

ADJUSTMENTS

 

 

ALLOCATION

 

 

 

 

AT ACQUISITION

 

TO FAIR

 

 

AT DECEMBER

 

 

MILLIONS

 

DATE

 

VALUE

 

 

31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

 

$

593.9

 

$

(1.6

)

 

$

592.3

 

 

Property, plant and equipment

 

369.3

 

(11.5

)

 

357.8

 

 

Other assets

 

30.5

 

(14.3

)

 

16.2

 

 

Identifiable intangible assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer relationships

 

840.0

 

 

 

840.0

 

 

Trademarks

 

120.0

 

 

 

120.0

 

 

Other technology

 

36.5

 

 

 

36.5

 

 

Total assets acquired

 

1,990.2

 

(27.4

)

 

1,962.8

 

 

Current liabilities

 

418.2

 

(8.7

)

 

409.5

 

 

Long-term debt

 

70.8

 

 

 

70.8

 

 

Net deferred tax liability

 

420.3

 

7.1

 

 

427.4

 

 

Noncontrolling interests and other liabilities

 

17.1

 

13.4

 

 

30.5

 

 

Total liabilities and noncontrolling interests assumed

 

926.4

 

11.8

 

 

938.2

 

 

Goodwill

 

993.0

 

37.1

 

 

1,030.1

 

 

Total aggregate purchase price

 

2,056.8

 

(2.1

)

 

2,054.7

 

 

Future consideration payable to sellers

 

(83.9

)

(2.5

)

 

(86.4

)

 

Total consideration transferred

 

$

1,972.9

 

$

(4.6

)

 

$

1,968.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The adjustments to the purchase price allocation during 2013 primarily relate to an estimated indemnification receivable, income tax liabilities, contingent liabilities, updated property, plant and equipment values and deferred taxes. The $4.6 million adjustment to the consideration transferred relates to post-acquisition working capital adjustments.

 

In accordance with the acquisition agreement, except under limited circumstances, the company was required to pay an additional amount in cash, up to $100 million in the aggregate, equal to 50% of the incremental tax on the merger consideration as a result of increases in applicable gains and investment taxes after December 31, 2012. Such additional payment was due on January 31, 2014, and was based on 2013 tax rates in effect on January 1, 2014. In January 2014, subsequent to the company’s year end, an additional payment of $86.4 million was made to the acquired entity’s former stockholders. The balance was classified within other current liabilities as of December 31, 2013.

 

The customer relationships, trademarks and other technology are being amortized over weighted average lives of 14, 12 and 7 years, respectively. In process research and development associated with the Champion acquisition was not significant.

 

Goodwill is calculated as the excess of consideration transferred over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired and represents the expected synergies and other benefits of combining the operations of Champion with the operations of the company’s existing Global Energy business. Key areas of cost synergies include leveraging and simplifying the global supply chain, including the reduction of plant and distribution center locations and product line optimization, as well as the reduction of other redundant facilities.

 

The results of Champion’s operations have been included in the company’s consolidated financial statements since the close of the acquisition in April 2013. Due to the rapid pace at which the business is being fully integrated with the company’s Global Energy segment, including all customer selling activity, discrete financial data specific to the legacy Champion business is not readily available post acquisition.

 

Based on applicable accounting and reporting guidance, the Champion acquisition is not material to the company’s consolidated financial statements; therefore, pro forma financial information has not been presented.

 

Nalco merger

 

On December 1, 2011, the company completed its merger with Nalco, the world’s leading water treatment and process improvement company. Based in Naperville, Illinois, Nalco provides water management sustainability offerings focused on industrial, energy and institutional market segments. Nalco’s programs are used in water treatment applications to prevent corrosion, contamination and buildup of harmful deposits and to extend asset life, among other functions, and in production processes to enhance process efficiency, extend asset life and improve customers’ end products. Nalco also helps customers reduce energy, water and other natural resource consumption, minimizing environmental releases. Effective with the Nalco merger, the company added Nalco’s three legacy operating units (Water Services, Paper Services and Energy Services) as individual reportable segments. Beginning in the first quarter of 2012, the Water Services, Paper Services and Energy Services reportable segments were renamed as the Global Water, Global Paper and Global Energy reportable segments, respectively. Effective in the first quarter of 2013, the Global Water and Global Paper individual reportable segments were aggregated with the Global Food & Beverage and Global Textile Care operating units forming the Global Industrial reportable segment. Further information related to the recast of the company’s reportable segments is included in Notes 2 and 17.

 

Under the terms of the merger agreement, each share of Nalco common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger was converted into the right to receive, at the election of the stockholder, either 0.7005 shares of Ecolab common stock or $38.80 in cash, without interest, provided that approximately 70% of the issued and outstanding Nalco common stock immediately prior to the effective date was converted into the right to receive Ecolab common stock and approximately 30% of issued and outstanding shares of Nalco common stock immediately prior to the effective date was converted into the right to receive cash. In order to achieve this 70%/30% stock-cash consideration mix, the merger agreement provided for pro-rata adjustments to and reallocation of the stock consideration paid to Nalco stockholders, and cash elections made by Nalco stockholders, as well as the allocation of cash as the default consideration paid for Nalco shares owned by stockholders who failed to make an election. Those Nalco stockholders making stock elections received approximately 94% of their consideration in Ecolab shares while those electing cash received 100% cash consideration. Nalco stockholders did not receive any fractional shares of Ecolab common stock in the merger. Instead, they received cash in lieu of any fractional shares of Ecolab common stock.

 

43



 

The final consideration transferred to acquire all of Nalco’s stock was as follows:

 

MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE

 

Cash consideration

 

 

 

 

 

Number of Nalco common shares outstanding receiving cash consideration

 

 

41.9

 

 

Cash consideration per common share outstanding

 

 

$

38.80

 

 

Total cash paid to Nalco shareholders electing cash consideration

 

 

$

1,623.9

 

 

Stock consideration

 

 

 

 

 

Number of Nalco common shares outstanding receiving stock consideration

 

 

97.5

 

 

Exchange ratio

 

 

0.7005

 

 

Ecolab shares issued to Nalco shareholders electing stock consideration

 

 

68.3

 

 

Ecolab’s closing stock price on December 1, 2011

 

 

$

55.62

 

 

Total fair value of stock consideration

 

 

$

3,799.7

 

 

Fair value of Nalco equity compensation awards converted to Ecolab awards

 

 

$

73.5

 

 

Total fair value of cash and stock consideration

 

 

$

5,497.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The company incurred certain merger and integration costs associated with the transaction that were expensed as incurred and are reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Income. A total of $18.6 million, $155.8 million and $62.8 million were incurred during 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Amounts included in cost of sales and net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest include recognition of fair value step-up in Nalco international inventory which is maintained on a FIFO basis. Amounts included in special (gains) and charges include merger and integration charges, closing costs and advisory fees. Amounts included in net interest expense include a loss on the extinguishment of Nalco’s senior notes, which were assumed as part of the merger, and fees to secure short-term credit facilities to initially fund the Nalco merger.

 

The company initially financed the merger through commercial paper borrowings backed by its $1.5 billion, 5 year credit facility and a $2.0 billion 364 day credit facility the company had in place at the close of the merger, as well as through proceeds from its $500 million private placement senior notes. See Note 6 for further discussion on the company’s debt. The company also issued 68.3 million shares of Ecolab common stock as part of the merger transaction. In addition, certain outstanding Nalco equity compensation awards were converted into Ecolab equity compensation awards of which the consideration portion was $73.5 million. See Notes 10 and 11 for further discussion on equity and equity compensation, respectively.

 

The merger has been accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting which requires, among other things, that most assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recognized at fair value as of the acquisition date. The following table summarizes the value of Nalco assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the merger date. Also summarized in the table, subsequent to the merger, net adjustments of $53.0 million have been made to the preliminary purchase price allocations of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, with a corresponding adjustment to goodwill. Purchase price allocations were finalized in the fourth quarter of 2012.

 

 

 

 

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INITIAL

 

ADJUSTMENTS

 

 

FINAL

 

 

MILLIONS

 

VALUATION

 

TO FAIR VALUE

 

 

VALUATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

 

$

1,869.6

 

$

(0.1

)

 

$

1,869.5

 

 

Property, plant and equipment

 

1,069.2

 

(1.2

)

 

1,068.0

 

 

Other assets

 

97.3

 

(3.3

)

 

94.0

 

 

Identifiable intangible assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer relationships

 

2,160.0

 

 

 

2,160.0

 

 

Patents

 

321.0

 

 

 

321.0

 

 

Trade names

 

1,230.0

 

 

 

1,230.0

 

 

Trademarks

 

79.0

 

 

 

79.0

 

 

Other technology

 

91.0

 

 

 

91.0

 

 

Total assets acquired

 

6,917.1

 

(4.6

)

 

6,912.5

 

 

Current liabilities

 

1,105.5

 

(0.1

)

 

1,105.4

 

 

Long-term debt

 

2,858.4

 

 

 

2,858.4

 

 

Pension and postretirement benefits

 

505.7

 

5.6

 

 

511.3

 

 

Net deferred tax liability

 

1,188.7

 

5.3

 

 

1,194.0

 

 

Noncontrolling interests and other liabilities

 

167.7

 

35.5

 

 

203.2

 

 

Total liabilities and noncontrolling interests assumed

 

5,826.0

 

46.3

 

 

5,872.3

 

 

Goodwill

 

4,403.9

 

53.0

 

 

4,456.9

 

 

Total consideration transferred

 

$

5,495.0

 

$

2.1

 

 

$

5,497.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The additional consideration of $2.1 million transferred in 2012 relates to the resolution of an appraisal action with respect to dissenting Nalco shares.

 

The customer relationships, patents, finite-lived trademarks and other technology are being amortized over weighted average lives of 15, 14, 15 and 8 years, respectively. The Nalco trade name has been determined to have an indefinite life.

 

In-process research and development associated with the Nalco merger was not significant.

 

Goodwill is calculated as the excess of the consideration transferred over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired and represents the expected synergies and other benefits from combining the operations of Nalco with the operations of Ecolab. The company expects that the merger will produce revenue growth synergies through the cross-selling of products in complementary markets and also expand geographic and market breadth, while adding scale to operations in smaller countries, thus creating a stronger more globally diversified and strategically well-positioned combined entity. Key areas of cost synergies include increased purchasing power for raw materials, supply chain consolidation and elimination of corporate general and administrative functions overlap.

 

The results of Nalco’s operations have been included in the company’s consolidated financial statements from the close of the merger. The following table provides net sales and operating income from the Nalco business included in the company’s results during 2011 following the December 1, 2011 merger.

 

MILLIONS

 

Net sales

 

$

 193.4

 

 

Operating income

 

13.8

 

 

 

The following table provides unaudited pro forma net sales and reported results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2011, assuming the Nalco merger had been completed on January 1, 2010. The historical financial information has been adjusted to give effect to pro forma events that are directly attributable to the merger, supportable and expected to have a continuing impact on the combined results. The unaudited pro forma results do not include any anticipated cost savings from operating efficiencies or synergies that could result from the merger. Accordingly, such pro forma amounts are not necessarily indicative of the results that

 

44



 

actually would have occurred had the merger been completed on January 1, 2010, nor are they indicative of future operating results of the combined company.

 

MILLIONS

 

2011

 

(unaudited)

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

11,283.9

 

Net income attributable to Ecolab

 

665.5

 

Earnings attributable to Ecolab per common share

 

 

 

Basic

 

2.22

 

Diluted

 

2.17

 

 

Other significant acquisition activity

 

Subsequent Event Activity

 

In April 2013, the company entered into an agreement to acquire Akzo Nobel N.V.’s Purate business which specializes in global antimicrobial water treatment. With 2012 revenues of approximately $23 million, the Purate business provides patented, proprietary chlorine dioxide generation programs for use in a wide array of water treatment applications. In December 2013, subsequent to the company’s fiscal year end for international operations, the company completed the acquisition of Purate. Beginning in the first quarter of 2014, the business will become part of the company’s Global Industrial reportable segment.

 

2013 Activity

 

In January 2013, the company completed the acquisition of Mexico-based Quimiproductos S.A. de C.V. (“Quimiproductos”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Fomento Economico Mexicano, S.A.B. de C.V. (commonly known as FEMSA). Quimiproductos produces and supplies cleaning, sanitizing and water treatment goods and services to breweries and beverage companies located in Mexico and Central and South America. Pre-acquisition annual sales of the business were approximately $43 million. Approximately $8 million of the purchase price was placed in an escrow account for potential indemnification purposes related to general representations and warranties. The business became part of the company’s Global Industrial reportable segment during the first quarter of 2013.

 

In April 2013, the company completed the acquisition of Russia-based OOO Master Chemicals (“Master Chemicals”). Master Chemicals sells oil field chemicals to oil and gas producers located throughout Russia and parts of the Ukraine. Pre-acquisition annual sales of the business were approximately $29 million. The business became part of the company’s Global Energy reportable segment during the second quarter of 2013.

 

2012 Activity

 

In December 2011, subsequent to the company’s fiscal year end for international operations, the company completed the acquisition of Esoform SpA, an independent Italian healthcare manufacturer focused on infection prevention and personal care. Based outside of Venice, Italy, with pre-acquisition annual sales of approximately $12 million, the business is included in the company’s Global Institutional reportable segment.

 

Also in December 2011, the company completed the acquisition of the InsetCenter pest elimination business in Brazil. Pre-acquisition annual sales of the acquired business were approximately $6 million. The business operations and staff have been integrated with the company’s existing Brazil Pest Elimination business, and is included in the company’s Other reportable segment.

 

In March 2012, the company acquired Econ Indústria e Comércio de Produtos de Higiene e Limpeza Ltda., a provider of cleaning and sanitizing products and services to the Brazilian foodservice industry. Based in Sao Paulo, Brazil, its pre-acquisition annual sales were approximately $9 million. The business operations have been integrated within the company’s existing Brazil Institutional business and its results are part of the company’s Global Institutional reportable segment.

 

2011 Activity

 

In December 2010, subsequent to the company’s fiscal year end for international operations, the company completed the purchase of the assets of Cleantec located in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. Cleantec is a developer, manufacturer and marketer of cleaning and hygiene products principally within the Australian food and beverage processing, foodservice, hospitality and textile care markets. The business, which had pre-acquisition annual sales of approximately $55 million, is included in the company’s Global Industrial reportable segment. The total purchase price was approximately $43 million, of which $2 million was placed in an escrow account for potential indemnification purposes. During the third quarter of 2012, the $2 million escrow balance was paid to the seller.

 

In March 2011, the company closed on the purchase of the assets of O.R. Solutions, Inc., a privately-held developer and marketer of surgical fluid warming and cooling systems in the U.S. The business, which had pre-acquisition annual sales of approximately $55 million, is included in the company’s Global Institutional reportable segment. The total purchase price was approximately $260 million, of which $26 million was placed in an escrow account for potential indemnification purposes related to general representations and warranties. During the third quarter of 2012, $13 million of the escrow balance was paid to the seller. The remaining $13 million escrow balance was paid to the seller in the first quarter of 2013.

 

Other Significant Acquisition Summary

 

Excluding the Nalco merger, the pro forma impact of all other acquisitions during 2013, 2012, and 2011 was not material to the company’s consolidated financial statements; therefore pro forma financial information is not presented. Based upon purchase price allocations, excluding the Champion and Nalco transactions which are shown previously in this note, the components of the aggregate purchase prices of 2013, 2012 and 2011 acquisitions are shown in the following table. The 2013 contingent consideration activity relates to payments on legacy Nalco acquisitions. The 2012 and 2011 contingent consideration relates to immaterial acquisitions completed during those years.

 

MILLIONS

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net tangible assets acquired (liabilities assumed)

 

 

$

(2.8

)

 

$

(1.0

)

$

58.6

 

Identifiable intangible assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer relationships

 

 

58.8

 

 

8.4

 

145.5

 

Patents

 

 

1.4

 

 

2.8

 

0.3

 

Trademarks

 

 

 

 

0.5

 

11.2

 

Other technology

 

 

1.0

 

 

0.3

 

8.4

 

Total intangible assets

 

 

61.2

 

 

12.0

 

165.4

 

Goodwill

 

 

41.7

 

 

23.3

 

94.3

 

Total aggregate purchase price

 

 

100.1

 

 

34.3

 

318.3

 

Contingent consideration

 

 

11.3

 

 

(2.6

)

(5.0

)

Liability for indemnification

 

 

2.4

 

 

16.0

 

(28.1

)

Net cash paid for acquisitions

 

 

$

113.8

 

 

$

47.7

 

$

285.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Excluding the Champion and Nalco transactions, the weighted average useful lives of intangible assets acquired was 13 years as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.

 

45



 

Dispositions

 

In August 2013, the company sold substantially all the equipment design and build business of its Mobotec air emissions control business. The Mobotec equipment design and build business had 2012 sales of approximately $27 million, which were within the company’s Global Industrial reportable segment. The company has retained Mobotec’s chemical business.

 

In December 2012, the company completed the sale of its Vehicle Care division for $116.9 million, resulting in a gain of $76.3 million, recorded in special (gains) and charges. Vehicle Care sales were approximately $65 million in 2011, and were included in the company’s Other reportable segment. Net cash proceeds were used to repay debt and for general corporate purposes.

 

During the third quarter of 2012, the company received additional payments of $13.0 million related to the sale of an investment in a U.S. business, originally sold prior to 2012. The corresponding gain of $13.0 million recognized during the third quarter of 2012 was recorded in special (gains) and charges.

 

The company had no business dispositions in 2011.

 

5. BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION

 

 

DECEMBER 31 (MILLIONS)

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

$

2,648.9

 

 

$

2,298.3

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

(80.9

)

 

(73.2

)

Total

 

$

2,568.0

 

 

$

2,225.1

 

Inventories

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finished goods

 

$

953.3

 

 

$

774.3

 

Raw materials and parts

 

391.0

 

 

338.3

 

Inventories at FIFO cost

 

1,344.3

 

 

1,112.6

 

Excess of FIFO cost over LIFO cost

 

(22.4

)

 

(24.5

)

Total

 

$

1,321.9

 

 

$

1,088.1

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

Land

 

$

191.4

 

 

$

158.9

 

Buildings and improvements

 

666.0

 

 

562.1

 

Leasehold improvements

 

87.9

 

 

80.5

 

Machinery and equipment

 

1,677.5

 

 

1,281.2

 

Merchandising and customer equipment

 

1,802.8

 

 

1,812.5

 

Capitalized software

 

435.4

 

 

385.7

 

Construction in progress

 

291.6

 

 

207.2

 

 

 

5,152.6

 

 

4,488.1

 

Accumulated depreciation

 

(2,270.6

)

 

(2,079.0

)

Total

 

$

2,882.0

 

 

$

2,409.1

 

Other intangible assets, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of intangible assets not subject to amortization:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trade names

 

$

1,230.0

 

 

$

1,230.0

 

Cost of intangible assets subject to amortization:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer relationships

 

$

3,455.6

 

 

$

2,588.6

 

Trademarks

 

308.1

 

 

185.2

 

Patents

 

425.6

 

 

414.7

 

Other technology

 

210.2

 

 

174.8

 

 

 

4,399.5

 

 

3,363.3

 

Accumulated amortization:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customer relationships

 

(594.9

)

 

(373.1

)

Trademarks

 

(70.4

)

 

(51.2

)

Patents

 

(95.7

)

 

(65.6

)

Other technology

 

(83.2

)

 

(59.3

)

Total

 

$

4,785.3

 

 

$

4,044.1

 

Other assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred income taxes

 

$

54.5

 

 

$

51.0

 

Deferred financing costs

 

31.7

 

 

40.8

 

Pension

 

90.2

 

 

7.0

 

Other

 

231.5

 

 

207.8

 

Total

 

$

407.9

 

 

$

306.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

46



 

DECEMBER 31 (MILLIONS)

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other current liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discounts and rebates

 

$

263.2

 

 

$

244.4

 

Dividends payable

 

82.8

 

 

 

Interest payable

 

19.6

 

 

19.5

 

Taxes payable, other than income

 

115.3

 

 

97.3

 

Derivative liabilities

 

14.2

 

 

9.9

 

Restructuring

 

68.3

 

 

116.6

 

Future consideration payable to Champion sellers

 

86.4

 

 

 

Other

 

304.0

 

 

283.3

 

Total

 

$

953.8

 

 

$

771.0

 

Other liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred income taxes

 

$

1,661.3

 

 

$

1,174.2

 

Income taxes payable - noncurrent

 

90.2

 

 

81.5

 

Restructuring

 

12.9

 

 

 

Other

 

134.9

 

 

147.2

 

Total

 

$

1,899.3

 

 

$

1,402.9

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative financial instruments, net of tax

 

$

(6.6

)

 

$

(13.6

)

Unrecognized pension and postretirement benefit expense, net of tax

 

(235.0

)

 

(613.8

)

Cumulative translation, net of tax

 

(63.6

)

 

167.7

 

Total

 

$

(305.2

)

 

$

(459.7

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6. DEBT AND INTEREST

 

 

The following table provides the components of the company’s short-term debt obligations, along with applicable interest rates as of December 31, 2013 and 2012:

 

MILLIONS,

 

2013

 

2012

 

EXCEPT INTEREST RATES

 

 

 

AVERAGE

 

 

 

AVERAGE

 

 

 

 

 

INTEREST

 

 

 

INTEREST

 

 

 

PAYABLE

 

RATE

 

PAYABLE

 

RATE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial paper

 

$

304.8

 

0.34

%

 

$

593.7

 

0.46

%

Notes payable

 

50.9

 

9.43

%

 

44.5

 

10.04

%

Long-term debt, current maturities

 

505.3

 

 

 

 

167.6

 

 

 

Total

 

$

861.0

 

 

 

 

$

805.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2013, the company has in place a $1.5 billion multi-year credit facility, which expires in September 2016. During 2011, the company entered into a $2.0 billion, 364 day credit facility. In April 2012, the company reduced its 364 day credit facility from $2.0 billion to $1.0 billion. In August 2012, the company replaced the $1.0 billion 364 day credit facility, which was to expire in September 2012, with a $500 million 364 day credit facility. In August 2013, the company’s $500 million, 364 day credit facility expired and was not replaced. The company’s $1.5 billion facility in place as of December 31, 2013 has been established with a diverse syndicate of banks. No amounts were outstanding under any of these agreements at year end 2013 or 2012.

 

The credit facility supports the company’s U.S. commercial paper program, which was reduced to $1.5 billion subsequent to the expiration of the 364 day credit facility discussed above, and the company’s $200 million European commercial paper program. Combined borrowing under these two commercial paper programs may not exceed $1.5 billion. The company had $305 million and $594 million in outstanding U.S. commercial paper at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The company had no commercial paper outstanding under its European program at December 31, 2013 or 2012. As of December 31, 2013, the company’s short-term borrowing program was rated A-2 by Standard & Poor’s and P-2 by Moody’s.

 

47



 

The following table provides the components of the company’s long-term debt obligations, along with applicable interest rates as of December 31, 2013 and 2012:

 

MILLIONS, EXCEPT INTEREST RATES

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AVERAGE

 

EFFECTIVE

 

 

 

 

AVERAGE

 

EFFECTIVE

 

 

 

MATURITY

 

 

CARRYING

 

INTEREST

 

INTEREST

 

 

CARRYING

 

INTEREST

 

INTEREST

 

 

 

BY YEAR

 

 

VALUE

 

RATE

 

RATE

 

 

VALUE

 

RATE

 

RATE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Description / 2013 Principal Amount

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Series A private placement senior notes (0 euro)

 

2013

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

162.3

 

4.36

%

4.51

%

Series B private placement senior notes (175 million euro)

 

2016

 

 

237.8

 

4.59

%

4.67

%

 

227.3

 

4.59

%

4.67

%

Seven year 2008 senior notes ($250 million)

 

2015

 

 

249.7

 

4.88

%

4.99

%

 

249.4

 

4.88

%

4.99

%

Series A private placement senior notes ($250 million)

 

2018

 

 

250.0

 

3.69

%

5.15

%

 

250.0

 

3.69

%

5.15

%

Series B private placement senior notes ($250 million)

 

2023

 

 

250.0

 

4.32

%

4.32

%

 

250.0

 

4.32

%

4.32

%

Three year 2011 senior notes ($500 million)

 

2014

 

 

499.9

 

2.38

%

2.40

%

 

499.8

 

2.38

%

2.40

%

Five year 2011 senior notes ($1.25 billion)

 

2016

 

 

1,248.6

 

3.00

%

3.04

%

 

1,248.1

 

3.00

%

3.04

%

Ten year 2011 senior notes ($1.25 billion)

 

2021

 

 

1,249.3

 

4.35

%

4.36

%

 

1,249.3

 

4.35

%

4.36

%

Thirty year 2011 senior notes ($750 million)

 

2041

 

 

742.8

 

5.50

%

5.53

%

 

742.3

 

5.50

%

5.53

%

Three year 2012 senior notes ($500 million)

 

2015

 

 

499.9

 

1.00

%

1.02

%

 

499.8

 

1.00

%

1.02

%

Five year 2012 senior notes ($500 million)

 

2017

 

 

499.7

 

1.45

%

1.47

%

 

499.6

 

1.45

%

1.47

%

Term loan ($800 million)

 

2016

 

 

800.0

 

1.33

%

1.33

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital lease obligations

 

 

 

 

12.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

13.8

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

8.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

11.7

 

 

 

 

 

Total debt

 

 

 

 

6,548.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,903.7

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt, current maturities

 

 

 

 

(505.3

)

 

 

 

 

 

(167.6

)

 

 

 

 

Total long-term debt

 

 

 

 

$

6,043.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

5,736.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Term Loans

 

In November 2012, the company entered into a $900 million term loan credit agreement with various banks. In April 2013, in connection with the close of the Champion transaction, the company initiated term loan borrowings of $900 million. Under the agreement, the term loan bears interest at a floating base rate plus a credit rating based margin. The term loan can be repaid in part or in full at any time without penalty, but in any event must be repaid in full by April 2016. In September 2013, the company repaid $100 million of term loan borrowings. Further information related to the Champion acquisition is included in Note 4. In February 2014, subsequent to the company’s year end, it repaid $100 million of term loan borrowings.

 

Public Notes

 

In December 2012, in a public offering, the company issued $500 million of debt securities that mature in 2017 at a rate of 1.45%. The proceeds were used to finance a portion of the cash consideration paid in connection with the Champion acquisition.

 

In August 2012, in a public offering, the company issued $500 million of debt securities that mature in 2015 at a rate of 1.00%. The proceeds were used to refinance outstanding commercial paper and for general corporate purposes.

 

In December 2011, the company issued $3.75 billion of debt securities in a public debt offering. The offering was a multi-tranche transaction consisting of three, five, ten and thirty year maturities. Interest rates range from 2.38% to 5.50%. The proceeds were used to repay outstanding commercial paper, which was issued to fund a portion of the cash component of the Nalco merger, repay the Nalco term loans and fund share repurchases.

 

In February 2008, the company issued and sold $250 million aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes that mature in 2015 at a rate of 4.88% in a public debt offering. The proceeds were used to refinance outstanding commercial paper and for general corporate purposes.

 

The series of notes issued by the company in December 2012, August 2012, December 2011 and February 2008, pursuant to public debt offerings (the “Public Notes”) may be redeemed by the company at its option at redemption prices that include accrued and unpaid interest and a make-whole premium. Upon the occurrence of a change of control accompanied by a downgrade of the Public Notes below investment grade rating, within a specified time period, the company will be required to offer to repurchase the Public Notes at a price equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount thereof, plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase.

 

The Public Notes are senior unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of the company and rank equally with all other senior and unsubordinated indebtedness of the company from time to time outstanding.

 

Private Notes

 

In October 2011, the company entered into a Note Purchase Agreement to issue and sell $500 million private placement senior notes, split into two series: $250 million of seven year notes that mature in 2018 at a rate of 3.69% and $250 million of twelve year notes that mature in 2023 at a rate of 4.32%. Both series of the notes were funded in November 2011. The proceeds were used for general corporate purposes, including partially funding the Nalco merger.

 

As of December 31, 2013, the company has outstanding euro 175 million ($238 million as of December 31, 2013) aggregate principal amount of the company’s private placement senior notes, consisting of 4.59% Series B Senior Notes, due 2016, pursuant to a Note Purchase Agreement dated July 26, 2006. The euro 125 million 4.36% Series A Senior Notes were repaid in December 2013 when they became due.

 

The series of notes issued by the company in December 2006 and November 2011 pursuant to private debt offerings (the “Private Notes”) may be redeemed by the company at its option at redemption prices that include accrued and unpaid interest and a make-whole premium. Upon the occurrence of specified changes of control involving the company, the company will be required to offer to repurchase the Private

 

48



 

Notes at a price equal to 100% of the aggregate principal amount thereof, plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase. Additionally, the company will be required to make a similar offer to repurchase the Private Notes upon the occurrence of specified merger events or asset sales involving the company, when accompanied by a downgrade of the Private Notes below investment grade rating, within a specified time period.

 

The Private Notes are senior obligations of the company and rank equal in right of payment with all other senior indebtedness of the company. The Private Notes shall be unconditionally guaranteed by subsidiaries of the company in certain circumstances, as described in the note purchase agreements as amended.

 

Covenants, Other Repayments and Net Interest Expense

 

The company is in compliance with all covenants at December 31, 2013.

 

In January 2012, the company redeemed $1.7 billion of Nalco senior notes, which were assumed in 2011 as part of the merger. As of December 31, 2011, the Nalco senior notes were fully and unconditionally guaranteed by certain Nalco subsidiaries. In conjunction with the redemption in January 2012, all guarantees in place as of December 31, 2011 were extinguished.

 

As of December 31, 2013, the aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt for the next five years were:

 

MILLIONS

 

 

 

 

2014

 

$

505

 

2015

 

755

 

2016

 

2,293

 

2017

 

501

 

2018

 

250

 

 

Interest expense and interest income incurred during 2013, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

 

MILLIONS

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

Interest expense

 

$

272.8

 

$

285.6

 

$

82.1

 

Interest income

 

(10.5

)

(8.9

)

(7.9

)

Interest expense, net

 

$

262.3

 

$

276.7

 

$

74.2

 

 

Interest expense generally includes the expense associated with the interest on the company’s outstanding borrowings. Interest expense also includes the amortization of debt issuance costs and debt discounts, which are both recognized over the term of the related debt. The increase in interest expense in 2012 was driven primarily by debt issued to fund the cash portion of the Nalco merger consideration, the repayment of Nalco debt and share repurchases. Interest expense for 2012 also includes an $18.2 million loss on extinguishment of Nalco debt, recognized in the first quarter of 2012.

 

7. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

 

 

The company’s financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, investments held in rabbi trusts, accounts receivable, accounts payable, contingent consideration obligations, estimated future consideration payable to Champion sellers, commercial paper, notes payable, foreign currency forward contracts and long-term debt.

 

Fair value is defined as the exit price, or the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. A hierarchy has been established for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels:

 

Level 1 - Inputs are quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities.

 

Level 2 - Inputs include observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets.

 

Level 3 - Inputs are unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data available.

 

The carrying amount and the estimated fair value for assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis were:

 

DECEMBER 31 (MILLIONS)

 

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CARRYING

 

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

 

 

 

AMOUNT

 

LEVEL 1

 

LEVEL 2

 

LEVEL 3

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investments held in rabbi trusts

 

$

4.3

 

$

4.3

 

$

 

$

 

Foreign currency forward contracts

 

20.2

 

 

20.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency forward contracts

 

14.2

 

 

14.2

 

 

Contingent consideration obligations

 

16.4

 

 

 

16.4

 

Future considerations payable to Champion sellers

 

86.4

 

 

 

86.4

 

 

 

 

 

DECEMBER 31 (MILLIONS)

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CARRYING

 

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

 

 

 

AMOUNT

 

LEVEL 1

 

LEVEL 2

 

LEVEL 3

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Money market funds held in rabbi trusts

 

$

2.2

 

$

2.2

 

$

 

$

 

Foreign currency forward contracts

 

6.5

 

 

6.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency forward contracts

 

9.9

 

 

9.9

 

 

Contingent consideration obligations

 

27.3

 

 

 

27.3

 

 

Investments held in rabbi trusts are classified within level 1 because they are valued using quoted prices in active markets. The carrying value of foreign currency forward contracts is at fair value, which is determined based on foreign currency exchange rates as of the balance sheet date, and is classified within level 2. The future consideration payable to Champion sellers is valued using level 3 inputs, and as discussed in Note 4 was paid in January 2014.

 

Contingent consideration obligations are recognized and measured at fair value at the acquisition date. Contingent consideration liabilities are classified within level 3 because fair value is measured based on the probability-weighted present value of the consideration expected to be transferred. The consideration expected to be transferred is based on the company’s expectations of various financial measures. The ultimate payment of contingent consideration could deviate from current estimates based on the actual results of these financial measures. Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration obligations during 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

 

MILLIONS

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

Balance at beginning of year

 

$

27.3

 

 

$

29.2

 

Liabilities recognized at acquistion date

 

 

 

 

 

2.6

 

Losses (gains) recognized in earnings

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

(1.9

)

Settlements

 

 

(11.3

)

 

 

(2.5

)

Foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

(0.1

)

Balance at end of year

 

$

16.4

 

 

$

27.3

 

 

49



 

The carrying values of accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value because of their short maturities. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, commercial paper and notes payable approximate fair value because of their short maturities, and as such are classified within level 1.

 

The fair value of long-term debt is based on quoted market prices for the same or similar debt instruments. The carrying amount and the estimated fair value of long-term debt held by the company were:

 

DECEMBER 31 (MILLIONS)

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

CARRYING

 

FAIR

 

CARRYING

 

FAIR

 

 

 

 

AMOUNT

 

VALUE

 

 

AMOUNT

 

VALUE

 

Long-term debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(including current maturities)

 

 

$

6,548.8

 

$

6,766.0

 

 

$

5,903.7

 

$

6,417.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8. DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING TRANSACTIONS

 

 

Derivative Instruments and Hedging

The company uses foreign currency forward contracts, interest rate swaps and foreign currency debt to manage risks associated with foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and net investments in foreign operations. The company does not hold derivative financial instruments of a speculative nature or for trading purposes. The company records all derivatives as assets and liabilities on the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in fair value are recognized immediately in earnings unless the derivative qualifies and is designated as a hedge. For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of changes in fair value of hedges is initially recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Amounts recorded in AOCI are reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transactions affect earnings. The company evaluates hedge effectiveness at inception and on an ongoing basis. If a derivative is no longer expected to be effective, hedge accounting is discontinued. Hedge ineffectiveness, if any, is recorded in earnings.

 

The company is exposed to credit risk in the event of nonperformance of counterparties for foreign currency forward exchange contracts and interest rate swap agreements. The company monitors its exposure to credit risk by using credit approvals and credit limits and by selecting major international banks and financial institutions as counterparties. The company does not anticipate nonperformance by any of these counterparties, and therefore recording a valuation allowance against the company’s derivative balance is not considered necessary.

 

Derivatives Designated as Cash Flow Hedges

The company utilizes foreign currency forward contracts to hedge the effect of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on forecasted foreign currency transactions, including: inventory purchases and intercompany royalty and management fee payments. These forward contracts are designated as cash flow hedges. The effective portions of the changes in fair value of these contracts are recorded in AOCI until the hedged items affect earnings, at which time the gain or loss is reclassified into the same line item in the Consolidated Statement of Income as the underlying exposure being hedged. All hedged transactions are forecasted to occur within the next twelve months.

 

The company occasionally enters into interest rate swap contracts to manage interest rate exposures. In 2011, the company entered into six forward starting swap contracts in connection with the issuance of its private placement debt during the fourth quarter of 2011. The interest rate swap agreements were designated and effective as a cash flow hedge of the expected interest payments related to the anticipated debt issuance. In 2006, the company entered into and subsequently closed two forward starting swap contracts related to the issuance of its senior euro notes with the net settlement recorded in AOCI. The amounts in AOCI for both the 2011 and 2006 transactions are recognized in earnings as part of interest expense over the remaining life of the notes as the forecasted interest transactions occur. The company did not have any forward starting interest rate swap agreements outstanding at December 31, 2013, 2012 or 2011.

 

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments

The company also uses foreign currency forward contracts to offset its exposure to the change in value of assets and liabilities held at foreign subsidiaries, primarily receivables and payables, which are remeasured at the end of each period. Although the contracts are effective economic hedges, they are not designated as accounting hedges. Therefore, changes in the value of these derivatives are recognized immediately in earnings, thereby offsetting the current earnings effect of the related foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities.

 

Derivative Summary

The following table summarizes the fair value of the company’s outstanding derivatives as of December 31. The amounts are included in other current assets and other current liabilities on the company’s balance sheet.

 

 

 

ASSET DERIVATIVES

 

LIABILITY DERIVATIVES

 

MILLIONS

 

2013

 

2012

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency forward contracts

 

 $

4.4

 

$

0.8

 

 $

1.1

 

$

1.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency forward contracts

 

15.8

 

5.7

 

13.1

 

8.2

 

Total

 

 $

20.2

 

$

6.5

 

 $

14.2

 

$

9.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The company’s derivative transactions are subject to master netting arrangements that allow the company to net settle contracts with the same counterparties. These arrangements generally do not call for collateral. Had the company elected to offset amounts in its Consolidated Balance Sheet, there would be a net asset of $6.0 million as of December 31, 2013 and a net liability of $3.4 million as of December 31, 2012.

 

The company had foreign currency forward exchange contracts with notional values that totaled $2.0 billion and $1.3 billion at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

 

50



 

The impact on AOCI and earnings from derivative contracts that qualified as cash flow hedges was as follows:

 

MILLIONS

 

LOCATION

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized gain (loss) recognized into AOCI (effective portion)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency forward contracts

 

AOCI (equity)

 

$

4.7

 

$

(1.9)

 

$

0.2

 

Interest rate swap contracts

 

AOCI (equity)

 

––

 

––

 

(15.3

)

Gain (loss) recognized in income (effective portion)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency forward contracts

 

Sales

 

––

 

(0.1)

 

(0.3

)

 

 

Cost of sales

 

(0.8)

 

2.0

 

(4.7

)

 

 

SG&A

 

 

0.2

 

(1.5

)

 

 

 

 

(0.8)

 

2.1

 

(6.5

)

Interest rate swap contracts

 

Interest expense, net

 

(4.1)

 

(4.1)

 

(0.8

)

 

 

Total

 

$

(4.9)

 

$

(2.0)

 

$

(7.3

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gains and losses recognized in income related to the ineffective portion of the company’s cash flow hedges were insignificant during 2013, 2012 and 2011.

 

The impact on earnings from derivative contracts that are not designated as hedging instruments was as follows:

 

MILLIONS

 

LOCATION

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gain (loss) recognized in income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency forward contracts

 

SG&A

 

$

(1.4)

 

$

(0.9)

 

$

2.9

 

 

 

Interest expense, net

 

(6.6)

 

(7.0)

 

(5.4

)

 

 

Total

 

$

(8.0)

 

$

(7.9)

 

$

(2.5

)

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The amounts recognized in SG&A above offset the earnings impact of the related foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities. The amounts recognized in interest expense above represent the component of the hedging gains (losses) attributable to the difference between the spot and forward rates of the hedges as a result of interest rate differentials.

 

Net Investment Hedge

The company designates its outstanding euro 175 million ($238 million as of December 31, 2013) senior notes and related accrued interest as a hedge of existing foreign currency exposures related to net investments the company has in certain Euro functional subsidiaries.

 

Prior to their respective redemptions in December 2013 and January 2012, the Ecolab Series A euro denominated senior notes and the Nalco euro denominated borrowings were also designated as a hedge of existing foreign currency exposures.

 

In the third quarter of 2012, the company entered into a forward contract with a notional amount of euro 100 million to hedge an additional portion of the company’s net investments in euro functional subsidiaries. The forward contract was closed in the second quarter of 2013.

 

The revaluation gains and losses on the euronotes and forward contract through the date of its closing, which are designated and effective as hedges of the company’s net investments, have been included as a component of the cumulative translation adjustment account.

 

Total revaluation gains and losses related to the euronotes and forward contract charged to shareholders’ equity were as follows:

 

MILLIONS

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

o

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revaluation gains (losses), net of tax

 

$

(11.4)

 

$

9.8

 

$

(9.5

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The company formally assesses, on a quarterly basis, whether the euro-denominated debt is effective at offsetting changes in the value of the underlying exposure. No hedge ineffectiveness was recorded in earnings during 2013, 2012 and 2011.

 

9. OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) INFORMATION

 

Comprehensive income (loss) includes net income, foreign currency translation adjustments, unrecognized gains and losses on securities, defined benefit pension and postretirement plan adjustments, gains and losses on derivative instruments designated and effective as cash flow hedges and non-derivative instruments designated and effective as foreign currency net investment hedges that are charged or credited to the accumulated other comprehensive loss account in shareholders’ equity.

 

The following table provides other comprehensive income (loss) information related to the company’s derivatives and hedging instruments and pension and postretirement benefits.

 

See Note 8 for additional information related to the company’s derivatives and hedging transactions. See Note 16 for additional information related to the company’s recognition of net actuarial losses and amortization of prior service benefits.

 

MILLIONS

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivative & Hedging Instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative & hedging instruments
Amount recognized in AOCI

 

$

4.7

 

$

(1.9)

 

$

(24.3

)

(Gains) losses reclassified from AOCI into income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales

 

 

0.1

 

0.3

 

Cost of sales

 

0.8

 

(2.0)

 

4.7

 

SG&A

 

 

(0.2)

 

1.5

 

Interest expense, net

 

4.1

 

4.1

 

0.8

 

 

 

4.9

 

2.0

 

7.3

 

Translation & other insignificant activity

 

0.9

 

0.5

 

(0.4

)

Tax impact

 

(3.5)

 

(0.7)

 

7.2

 

Net of tax

 

$

7.0

 

$

(0.1)

 

$

(10.2

)

Pension & Postretirement Benefits

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount recognized in AOCI

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current period net actuarial income (loss) and prior service costs

 

$

528.2

 

$

(238.6)

 

$

(183.4

)

Amount reclassified from AOCI

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of net actuarial loss and prior service costs and benefits adjustments

 

72.9

 

50.3

 

36.1

 

 

 

601.1

 

(188.3)

 

(147.3

)

Tax impact

 

(218.2)

 

57.1

 

60.0

 

Net of tax

 

$

382.9

 

$

(131.2)

 

$

(87.3

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The derivative losses reclassified from AOCI into income, net of tax, were $3.2 million, $1.1 million and $5.1 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The pension and postretirement net actuarial loss and prior service cost reclassified from AOCI into income, net of tax, was $46.4 million, $35.0 million and $21.4 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

 

51



 

10. SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

Authorized common stock, par value $1.00 per share, was 800 million shares at December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. Treasury stock is stated at cost. Dividends declared per share of common stock were $0.9650 for 2013, $0.8300 for 2012 and $0.7250 for 2011.

 

The company has 15 million shares, without par value, of authorized but unissued and undesignated preferred stock. The company’s former shareholder rights agreement was amended in December 2012 and the rights agreement was terminated as of December 31, 2012. Prior to termination of the rights agreement, 0.4 million shares of preferred stock were disignated as Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock and were reserved for issuance in connection with the rights agreement, with the remaining 14.6 million shares of preferred stock being undesignated. Following termination of the rights agreement, a Certificate of Elimination of the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock was filed on January 2, 2013 with the Delaware Secretary of State to restore the 0.4 million shares designated as Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock to the status of undesignated preferred stock.

 

Champion Acquisition

 

On April 10, 2013, the company issued 6,596,444 shares of common stock for the stock consideration portion of the Champion acquisition. Of the total shares issued, the company deposited 1,258,115 shares, or approximately $100 million of the total consideration, into an escrow fund to satisfy adjustments to the consideration and indemnification obligations of the acquired company’s stockholders. Further information related to the Champion acquisition is included in Note 4.

 

Nalco Merger

 

On December 1, 2011, the company issued 68,316,283 shares of common stock for the stock consideration portion of the Nalco merger. Further information related to the Nalco merger is included in Note 4.

 

Share Repurchases

 

In May 2011, the company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 15 million shares of common stock, including shares to be repurchased under Rule 10b5-1. In August 2011, the Finance Committee of the company’s Board of Directors, via delegation by the company’s Board of Directors, authorized the repurchase of an additional 10 million common shares which was contingent upon completion of the merger with Nalco.

 

In September 2011, under the existing Board authorization, subject to the completion of the Nalco merger, the company announced a $1.0 billion share repurchase program. As part of this program, in December 2011, the company entered into an accelerated share repurchase (“ASR”) agreement with a financial institution to repurchase $500 million of its common stock. Under the ASR, the company received 8,330,379 shares of its common stock in December 2011. The final per share purchase price and the total number of shares to be repurchased under the ASR agreement were generally based on the volume weighted average price of the company’s common stock during the term of the agreement. The ASR agreement ended in the first quarter of 2012. In connection with the finalization of the ASR agreement, the company received an additional 122,314 shares of common stock. All shares acquired under the ASR agreement were recorded as treasury stock. The company completed the $1.0 billion share repurchase program in the fourth quarter of 2013.

 

In addition to the ASR, the company reacquired 3,096,464 shares, 2,600,569 shares and 3,491,425 shares of its common stock in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, through its share repurchase program through open market or private purchases. The number of shares repurchased in 2013 includes 1,258,115 shares the company repurchased from the Champion escrow account, with the cash paid to the beneficial shareholders deposited back into escrow. As of December 31, 2013, 12,713,632 shares remained to be repurchased under the company’s repurchase authorization. The company intends to repurchase all shares under its authorizations, for which no expiration date has been established, in open market or privately negotiated transactions, subject to market conditions.

 

The company also reacquired 346,941 shares, 734,857 shares and 187,454 shares of its common stock in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, related to the exercise of stock options and the vesting of stock awards and units.

 

11. EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

 

The company’s equity compensation plans provide for grants of stock options, restricted stock awards and restricted stock unit awards. Common shares available for grant as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 were 20,269,664, 5,316,532 and 8,813,059, respectively. Common shares available for grant reflect 17 million shares approved by shareholders in May 2013 for issuance under the plans. The company generally issues authorized but previously unissued shares to satisfy stock option exercises. The company has a share repurchase program and generally repurchases shares on the open market to help offset the dilutive effect of share-based compensation.

 

The company’s annual long-term incentive share-based compensation program is made up of 50% stock options and 50% performance-based restricted stock unit (“PBRSU”) awards. The company also grants a limited number of non-performance based restricted stock awards (“RSA”) and restricted stock unit awards (“RSU”).

 

Prior to the Nalco merger, Nalco had outstanding stock options, restricted stock awards and performance share awards that were issued pursuant to its incentive compensation plan, as well as certain non-plan inducement stock options and restricted stock awards. For each of the converted awards discussed below, the stock award exchange ratio of .67959 was used to convert Nalco awards into Ecolab awards. As a result of the merger, the majority of Nalco’s existing stock options fully vested. Each outstanding Nalco option was converted into an option to purchase the company’s common stock with both the number of options and the exercise price adjusted accordingly based on the stock award exchange ratio. Pursuant to change-in-control agreements, Nalco’s existing restricted stock awards to non-employee directors and certain officers, in general, fully vested as a result of the merger. For those awards that did not vest as a result of the merger, each unvested restricted stock award was converted based on the stock award exchange ratio into a restricted stock award of the company, with vesting subject to continued employment. In conjunction with the merger, the level of attainment of the performance criteria applicable to converted Nalco performance based restricted stock awards was fixed based on actual and target financial performance. As such, each Nalco performance share award converted based on the stock award exchange ratio into a time based restricted award of the company based on such performance level, with vesting subject to continued employment. The total fair value of Nalco’s converted equity compensation as of the merger date was $111 million, of which $73 million was included in the consideration transferred to acquire Nalco, with the remaining $38 million subject to expense recognition

 

52



 

over the remainder of the vesting term. As of December 31, 2013, $1 million of the $38 million remains to be expensed.

 

Total compensation expense related to all share-based compensation plans was $70 million ($48 million net of tax benefit), $66 million ($45 million net of tax benefit) and $40 million ($27 million net of tax benefit) for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

 

As of December 31, 2013, there was $118 million of total measured but unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under all of the company’s plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.0 years.

 

Stock Options

 

Options are granted to purchase shares of the company’s stock at the average daily share price on the date of grant. These options generally expire within ten years from the grant date. The company recognizes compensation expense for these awards on a straight-line basis over the three year vesting period. Stock option grants to retirement eligible recipients are attributed to expense using the non-substantive vesting method.

 

A summary of stock option activity and average exercise prices is as follows:

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

NUMBER OF

 

EXERCISE

 

NUMBER OF

 

EXERCISE

 

NUMBER OF

 

EXERCISE

 

 

 

OPTIONS

 

PRICE (a)

 

OPTIONS

 

PRICE (a)

 

OPTIONS

 

PRICE (a)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding, beginning of year

 

15,125,156

 

$

48.29

 

20,126,579

 

$

41.45

 

19,988,025

 

$

38.66

 

Granted

 

1,640,210

 

101.22

 

2,238,267

 

71.17

 

2,661,551

 

55.38

 

Issued in connection with Nalco merger

 

 

 

 

 

883,173

 

29.35

 

Exercised

 

(2,583,026

)

40.68

 

(6,774,032

)

35.16

 

(3,331,926

)

32.59

 

Canceled

 

(256,084

)

63.00

 

(465,658

)

53.61

 

(74,244

)

43.68

 

Outstanding, end of year

 

13,926,256

 

$

55.66

 

15,125,156

 

$

48.29

 

20,126,579

 

$

41.45

 

Exercisable, end of year

 

10,233,265

 

$

46.33

 

11,036,700

 

$

42.77

 

15,885,276

 

$

38.57

 

Vested and expected to vest, end of year

 

13,489,701

 

$

55.17

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(a) Represents weighted average price.

 

The total intrinsic value of options (the amount by which the stock price exceeded the exercise price of the option on the date of exercise) that were exercised during 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $123 million, $211 million and $69 million, respectively.

 

The total aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding as of December 31, 2013 was $675 million, with a corresponding weighted-average remaining contractual life of 6.3 years. The total aggregate intrinsic value of options exercisable as of December 31, 2013 was $592 million, with a corresponding weighted-average remaining contractual life of 5.3 years. The total aggregate intrinsic value of options vested and expected to vest as of December 31, 2013 was $661 million, with a corresponding weighted-average remaining contractual life of 6.2 years.

 

The lattice (binomial) option-pricing model is used to estimate the fair value of options at grant date. The company’s primary employee option grant occurs during the fourth quarter. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted and the significant assumptions used in determining the underlying fair value of each option grant, on the date of grant were as follows:

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted at market prices

 

$     22.53

 

     13.77

 

     11.01

 

Assumptions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Risk-free rate of return

 

1.8%

 

0.9%

 

1.4

%

Expected life

 

6 years

 

6 years

 

6 years

 

Expected volatility

 

23.0%

 

22.8%

 

22.8

%

Expected dividend yield

 

1.1%

 

1.3%

 

1.4

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

 

The risk-free rate of return is determined based on a yield curve of U.S. treasury rates from one month to ten years and a period commensurate with the expected life of the options granted. Expected volatility is established based on historical volatility of the company’s stock price. The expected dividend yield is determined based on the company’s annual dividend amount as a percentage of the average stock price at the time of the grant.

 

Restricted Stock Awards and Restricted Stock Units

 

The expense associated with PBRSU awards is based on the average of the high and low share price of the company’s common stock on the date of grant, adjusted for the absence of future dividends. The awards vest based on the company achieving a defined performance target and with continued service for a three year period. Upon vesting, the company issues shares of its common stock such that one award unit equals one share of common stock. The company assesses the probability of achieving the performance target and recognizes expense over the three year vesting period when it is probable the performance target will be met. PBRSU awards granted to retirement eligible recipients are attributed to expense using the non-substantive vesting method. The awards are generally subject to forfeiture in the event of termination of employment.

 

The expense associated with shares of non-performance based RSAs and RSUs is based on the average of the high and low share price of the company’s common stock on the date of grant, adjusted for the absence of future dividends and is amortized on a straight-line basis over the periods during which the restrictions lapse. The company currently has RSAs and RSUs that vest over periods between 12 and 60 months. The awards are generally subject to forfeiture in the event of termination of employment.

 

53



 

A summary of non-vested PBRSU awards and restricted stock activity is as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

GRANT

 

 

 

GRANT

 

 

 

PBRSU

 

DATE FAIR

 

RSAs AND

 

DATE FAIR

 

 

 

AWARDS

 

VALUE (a)

 

RSUs

 

VALUE (a)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2010

 

845,630

 

$

44.70

 

167,171

 

$

43.54

 

Granted

 

572,350

 

52.96

 

126,121

 

51.02

 

Issued in connection with Nalco merger

 

857,366

 

55.62

 

808,883

 

55.62

 

Vested / Earned

 

(13,360)

 

55.62

 

(81,874)

 

48.71

 

Canceled

 

(121,321)

 

54.07

 

(3,641)

 

41.80

 

December 31, 2011

 

2,140,665

 

$

50.68

 

1,016,660

 

$

53.67

 

Granted

 

454,620

 

68.63

 

230,193

 

64.10

 

Vested / Earned

 

(285,249)

 

55.62

 

(362,926)

 

53.80

 

Canceled

 

(218,764)

 

53.14

 

(86,714)

 

52.03

 

December 31, 2012

 

2,091,272

 

$

53.65

 

797,213

 

$

56.79

 

Granted

 

342,207

 

99.63

 

109,212

 

90.56

 

Vested / Earned

 

(594,366)

 

47.60

 

(249,093)

 

53.59

 

Canceled

 

(88,844)

 

57.71

 

(35,311)

 

56.20

 

December 31, 2013

 

1,750,269

 

$

64.49

 

622,021

 

$

64.04

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(a) Represents weighted average price.

 

12. INCOME TAXES

Income before income taxes consisted of:

 

MILLIONS

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

 

$

725.8

 

$

594.8

 

$

440.0

 

International

 

572.5

 

417.8

 

239.6

 

Total

 

$

1,298.3

 

$

1,012.6

 

$

679.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The provision for income taxes consisted of:

 

MILLIONS

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal and state

 

$

301.3

 

$

141.3

 

$

104.9

 

International

 

153.8

 

173.2

 

69.7

 

Total current

 

455.1

 

314.5

 

174.6

 

Federal and state

 

(124.0)

 

31.7

 

25.2

 

International

 

(6.5)

 

(34.9)

 

16.5

 

Total deferred

 

(130.5)

 

(3.2)

 

41.7

 

Provision for income taxes

 

$

324.7

 

$

311.3

 

$

216.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The company’s overall net deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities were comprised of the following:

 

DECEMBER 31 (MILLIONS)

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred tax assets

 

 

 

 

 

Other accrued liabilities

 

$

125.9

 

$

136.1

 

Loss carryforwards

 

106.3

 

110.4

 

Share-based compensation

 

70.1

 

71.6

 

Pension and other comprehensive income

 

160.9

 

337.8

 

Foreign tax credits

 

29.9

 

47.6

 

Other, net

 

150.0

 

138.9

 

Valuation allowance

 

(88.3)

 

(116.5

)

Total

 

554.8

 

725.9

 

Deferred tax liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment basis differences

 

287.3

 

246.8

 

Intangible assets

 

1,488.0

 

1,218.0

 

Unremitted foreign earnings

 

94.5

 

68.3

 

Other, net

 

132.0

 

114.2

 

Total

 

2,001.8

 

1,647.3

 

Net deferred tax liabilities balance

 

$

(1,447.0)

 

$

(921.4

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2013 the company has tax effected federal, state and international net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $1 million, $13 million and $92 million, respectively, which will be available to offset future taxable income. The state loss carryforwards expire from 2014 to 2033. For the international loss carryforwards, $44 million expire from 2014 to 2023 and $48 million have no expiration.

 

The company has recorded an $88 million valuation allowance on certain deferred tax assets based on management’s determination that it is more likely than not that the tax benefits will not be utilized. The company’s U.S. foreign tax credit carryforward of $28 million has a ten-year carryforward period and will expire between 2019 and 2024 if not utilized.

 

54



 

A reconciliation of the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate to the company’s effective income tax rate is as follows:

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

Statutory U.S. rate

 

35.0%

 

35.0%

 

35.0%

 

State income taxes, net of federal benefit

 

1.1

 

1.1

 

2.0

 

Foreign operations

 

(4.5)

 

(3.0)

 

(3.2)

 

Domestic manufacturing deduction

 

(2.6)

 

(2.6)

 

(2.9)

 

R&D credit

 

(1.4)

 

 

(0.3)

 

Change in valuation allowance

 

(1.0)

 

 

1.2

 

Nondeductible deal costs

 

0.2

 

0.5

 

0.8

 

Audit settlements and refunds

 

(0.8)

 

0.1

 

(0.5)

 

Other, net

 

(1.0)

 

(0.4)

 

(0.3)

 

Effective income tax rate

 

25.0%

 

30.7%

 

31.8%

 

 

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the company has recorded deferred tax liabilities of $94.5 million and $68.3 million, respectively, on foreign earnings of the legacy Nalco entities and legacy Champion entities that the company intends to repatriate. The deferred tax liabilities originated based on purchase accounting decisions made in connection with the Nalco merger and Champion acquisition and were the result of extensive studies required to calculate the impact at the purchase date.

 

U.S. deferred income taxes are not provided on certain other unremitted foreign earnings that are considered permanently reinvested which as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 were approximately $1.6 billion and $1.4 billion, respectively. These earnings are considered to be reinvested indefinitely or available for distribution with foreign tax credits to offset the amount of applicable income tax and foreign withholding taxes that may be payable on remittance. It is impractical due to the complexities associated with its hypothetical calculation to determine the amount of incremental taxes that might arise if all undistributed earnings were distributed.

 

The company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various U.S. state and international jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the company is no longer subject to state and foreign income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2011. The IRS has completed examinations of the company’s U.S. federal income tax returns through 2010. The Ecolab (including Nalco) U.S. income tax returns for the years 2011 and 2012 are currently under audit. The legacy Champion U.S. income tax return for the year 2011 is currently under audit. In addition to the U.S. federal examination, there is ongoing audit activity in several U.S. state and foreign jurisdictions. The company anticipates changes to its uncertain tax positions due to closing of various audit years mentioned above. The company believes these changes could result in a decrease in the company’s gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits of up to $13 million during the next twelve months. Decreases in the company’s gross liability could result in offsets to other balance sheet accounts, cash payments, and/or adjustments to tax expense. The occurrence of these events and/or other events not included above within the next twelve months could change depending on a variety of factors and result in amounts different from above.

 

During 2013, the company recognized a net discrete tax benefit of $41.7 million. The net benefit in 2013 is driven primarily by the net release of valuation allowances related to the realizability of foreign deferred tax assets of $11.5 million, the remeasurement of certain deferred tax assets and liabilities of $11.3 million and recognizing adjustments from filing our 2012 U.S. federal and state tax returns of $11.0 million. The remaining discrete tax items relate primarily to recognizing settlements related to prior year income tax audits, law changes within a foreign jurisdiction, the retroactive extension during first quarter 2013 of the U.S. R&D credit for 2012, foreign audit adjustments and other adjustments to deferred tax assets and liabilities.

 

During 2012, the company recognized a net discrete tax benefit of $9.2 million. The net benefit in 2012 is based largely on benefits related to remeasurement of certain deferred tax assets and liabilities resulting from changing tax jurisdictions, recognizing adjustments from filing the company’s 2011 U.S. federal tax return as well as a release of a valuation allowance related to a capital loss carryforward. Discrete benefits were partially offset by the remeasurement of certain deferred tax assets and liabilities resulting from changes in local country tax rates, state and foreign country audit settlements and adjustments.

 

During 2011, the company recognized a net discrete tax expense of $7.4 million. The net expense in 2011 is largely made up of favorable settlements and adjustments related to prior year returns and reserves which were more than offset by the impact of a charge related to the realizability of foreign net operating loss carryforwards as well as a change in the blended state tax rate. The settlements are related to the company’s 1999 through 2001 and 2007 through 2008 U.S. income tax returns and various state and other international returns.

 

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

 

MILLIONS

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

Balance at beginning of year

 

$

93.1

 

$

89.5

 

$

66.2

 

Additions based on tax positions related to the current year

 

9.1

 

7.5

 

7.3

 

Additions for tax positions of prior years

 

6.1

 

5.0

 

1.4

 

Reductions for tax positions of prior years

 

(15.6)

 

(3.4)

 

(27.0)

 

Reductions for tax positions due to statute of limitations

 

(3.6)

 

(0.8)

 

(0.8)

 

Settlements

 

(0.7)

 

(8.0)

 

(8.0)

 

Assumed in connection with the Champion acquisition

 

9.8

 

 

 

Assumed in connection with the Nalco merger

 

 

7.8

 

50.1

 

Foreign currency translation

 

0.5

 

(4.5)

 

0.3

 

Balance at end of year

 

$

98.7

 

$

93.1

 

$

89.5

 

 

All tax positions included in the gross liability for unrecognized tax benefits balance at December 31, 2013, depending on the ultimate resolution, could impact the annual effective tax rate in future periods.

 

The company recognizes both penalties and accrued interest related to unrecognized tax benefits in the company’s provision for income taxes. During the year ended December 31, 2013 the company accrued approximately $2 million in interest. The company had approximately $12 million and $11 million of accrued interest, including minor amounts for penalties, at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

 

55



 

13. RENTALS AND LEASES

 

The company leases sales and administrative office facilities, distribution centers, research and manufacturing facilities, as well as vehicles and other equipment under operating leases. Total rental expense under the company’s operating leases was $212 million in 2013, $183 million in 2012 and $130 million in 2011. As of December 31, 2013, identifiable future minimum payments with non-cancelable terms in excess of one year were:

 

MILLIONS

2014

 

$

122

 

2015

 

101

 

2016

 

89

 

2017

 

72

 

2018

 

59

 

Thereafter

 

168

 

 

Total

 

$

611

 

 

The company enters into operating leases for vehicles whose non-cancelable terms are one year or less in duration with month-to-month renewal options. These leases have been excluded from the table above. The company estimates payments under such leases will approximate $51 million in 2014. These vehicle leases have guaranteed residual values that have historically been satisfied by the proceeds on the sale of the vehicles.

 

14. RESEARCH EXPENDITURES

 

Research expenditures that relate to the development of new products and processes, including significant improvements and refinements to existing products, are expensed as incurred. Such costs were $188 million in 2013, $183 million in 2012 and $96 million in 2011. The company did not participate in any material customer sponsored research during 2013, 2012 or 2011.

 

15. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

 

The company is subject to various claims and contingencies related to, among other things, workers’ compensation, general liability (including product liability), automobile claims, health care claims, environmental matters and lawsuits. The company is also subject to various claims and contingencies related to income taxes, which are covered in Note 12. The company also has contractual obligations including lease commitments, which are covered in Note 13.

 

The company records liabilities where a contingent loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated. If the reasonable estimate of a probable loss is a range, the company records the most probable estimate of the loss or the minimum amount when no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount. The company discloses a contingent liability even if the liability is not probable or the amount is not estimable, or both, if there is a reasonable possibility that a material loss may have been incurred.

 

Insurance: Globally the company has high deductible insurance policies for property and casualty losses. The company is insured for losses in excess of these deductibles, subject to policy terms and conditions and has recorded both a liability and an offsetting receivable for amounts in excess of these deductibles. The company is self-insured for health care claims for eligible participating employees, subject to certain deductibles and limitations. The company determines its liabilities for claims on an actuarial basis.

 

Litigation and Environmental Matters: The company and certain subsidiaries are party to various lawsuits, claims and environmental actions that have arisen in the ordinary course of business. These include from time to time antitrust, commercial, patent infringement, product liability and wage hour lawsuits, as well as possible obligations to investigate and mitigate the effects on the environment of the disposal or release of certain chemical substances at various sites, such as Superfund sites and other operating or closed facilities. The company has established accruals for certain lawsuits, claims and environmental matters. The company currently believes that there is not a reasonably possible risk of material loss in excess of the amounts accrued related to these legal matters. Because litigation is inherently uncertain, and unfavorable rulings or developments could occur, there can be no certainty that the company may not ultimately incur charges in excess of recorded liabilities. A future adverse ruling, settlement or unfavorable development could result in future charges that could have a material adverse effect on the company’s results of operations or cash flows in the period in which they are recorded. The company currently believes that such future charges related to suits and legal claims, if any, would not have a material adverse effect on the company’s consolidated financial position.

 

Environmental Matters

 

The company is currently participating in environmental assessments and remediation at approximately 50 locations, most of which are in the U.S. and environmental liabilities have been accrued reflecting management’s best estimate of future costs. Potential insurance reimbursements are not anticipated in the company’s accruals for environmental liabilities.

 

Matters Related to Wage Hour Claims

 

Doug Ladore v. Ecolab Inc., et al., United States District Court for the Central District of California, case no. CV 11-9386 GAF (FMOx), is a wage hour class action brought on behalf of California Pest Elimination employees. The case was certified for class treatment, and on January 22, 2013, the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment was granted and the court found that the class of employees was entitled to overtime pay. On February 22, 2013, pursuant to court-ordered mediation, the company reached a preliminary settlement with the plaintiffs, which was approved by the court on November 12, 2013. The settlement amount, which is not material to the company’s operation or financial position, was paid in January 2014.

 

In Cooper v. Ecolab Inc., California State Court —Superior Court-Los Angeles County, case no. BC486875, the plaintiffs sought certification of a purported class of terminated California employees of any business for alleged violation of statutory obligations regarding payment of accrued vacation upon termination. The company reached a preliminary settlement with the plaintiffs, which remains subject to court approval. The settlement amount is not material to the company’s operations or financial position.

 

The company is a defendant in four other pending wage hour lawsuits claiming violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) or a similar state law. Of these four suits, two have been certified for class action status. Icard v. Ecolab, U.S. District Court — Northern District of California, case no. C 13-05097 PJH, an action under California state law, has been certified for class treatment of California Institutional employees. In Cancilla v. Ecolab, U.S. District Court-Northern District of California, case no. CV 12-03001, the Court conditionally certified a nationwide class of Pest Elimination Service Specialists for alleged FLSA violations. The suit also seeks a purported California sub-class for alleged California wage hour law violations. A third pending suit, Charlot v. Ecolab Inc., U.S. District Court-Eastern District of New York, case no. CV 12-04543, seeks nationwide class certification of Institutional employees for alleged FLSA violations as well as

 

56



 

purported state sub-classes in two states (New York and New Jersey) alleging violations of state wage hour laws. A fourth pending suit, Schneider v. Ecolab, Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, case no. 2014 CH 193, seeks certification of a class of Institutional employees for alleged FLSA violations as well as Illinois wage and hour laws.

 

Matters Related to Deepwater Horizon Incident Response

 

On April 22, 2010, the deepwater drilling platform, the Deepwater Horizon, operated by a subsidiary of BP plc, sank in the Gulf of Mexico after a catastrophic explosion and fire that began on April 20, 2010. A massive oil spill resulted. Approximately one week following the incident, subsidiaries of BP plc, under the authorization of the responding federal agencies, formally requested Nalco Company, now an indirect subsidiary of Ecolab, to supply large quantities of COREXIT® 9500, a Nalco oil dispersant product listed on the U.S. EPA National Contingency Plan Product Schedule. Nalco Company responded immediately by providing available COREXIT and increasing production to supply the product to BP’s subsidiaries for use, as authorized and directed by agencies of the federal government throughout the incident. Prior to the incident, Nalco and its subsidiaries had not provided products or services or otherwise had any involvement with the Deepwater Horizon platform. On July 15, 2010, BP announced that it had capped the leaking well, and the application of dispersants by the responding parties ceased shortly thereafter.

 

On May 1, 2010, the President appointed retired U.S. Coast Guard Commandant Admiral Thad Allen to serve as the National Incident Commander in charge of the coordination of the response to the incident at the national level. The EPA directed numerous tests of all the dispersants on the National Contingency Plan Product Schedule, including those provided by Nalco Company, “to ensure decisions about ongoing dispersant use in the Gulf of Mexico are grounded in the best available science.” Nalco Company cooperated with this testing process and continued to supply COREXIT, as requested by BP and government authorities. After review and testing of a number of dispersants, on September 30, 2010, and on August 2, 2010, the EPA released toxicity data for eight oil dispersants.

 

The use of dispersants by the responding parties was one tool used by the government and BP to avoid and reduce damage to the Gulf area from the spill. Since the spill occurred, the EPA and other federal agencies have closely monitored conditions in areas where dispersant was applied. Nalco Company has encouraged ongoing monitoring and review of COREXIT and other dispersants and has cooperated fully with the governmental review and approval process. However, in connection with its provision of COREXIT, Nalco Company has been named in several lawsuits as described below.

 

Cases arising out of the Deepwater Horizon accident were administratively transferred for pre-trial purposes to a judge in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana with other related cases under In Re: Oil Spill by the Oil Rig “Deepwater Horizon” in the Gulf of Mexico, on April 20, 2010, Case No. 10-md-02179 (E.D. La.) (“MDL 2179”).

 

Putative Class Action Litigation

 

Nalco Company was named, along with other unaffiliated defendants, in six putative class action complaints related to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill: Adams v. Louisiana, et al., Case No. 11-cv-01051 (E.D. La.); Elrod, et al. v. BP Exploration & Production Inc., et al., 12-cv-00981 (E.D. La.); Harris, et al. v. BP, plc, et al., Case No. 2:10-cv-02078-CJBSS (E.D. La.); Irelan v. BP Products, Inc., et al., Case No. 11-cv-00881 (E.D. La.); Petitjean, et al. v. BP, plc, et al., Case No. 3:10-cv-00316-RS-EMT (N.D. Fla.); and, Wright, et al. v. BP, plc, et al., Case No. 1:10-cv-00397-B (S.D. Ala.). The cases were filed on behalf of various potential classes of persons who live and work in or derive income from the effected Coastal region. Each of the actions contains substantially similar allegations, generally alleging, among other things, negligence relating to the use of our COREXIT dispersant in connection with the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. The plaintiffs in these putative class action lawsuits are generally seeking awards of unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, and attorneys’ fees and costs. These cases have been consolidated in MDL 2179.

 

Other Related Claims Pending in MDL 2179

 

Nalco Company was also named, along with other unaffiliated defendants, in 23 complaints filed by individuals: Alexander, et al. v. BP Exploration & Production, et al., Case No. 11-cv-00951 (E.D. La.); Best v. British Petroleum plc, et al., Case No. 11-cv-00772 (E.D. La.); Black v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc., et al. Case No. 2:11-cv- 867, (E.D. La.); Brooks v. Tidewater Marine LLC, et al., Case No. 11-cv- 00049 (S.D. Tex.); Capt Ander, Inc. v. BP, plc, et al., Case No. 4:10-cv-00364-RH-WCS (N.D. Fla.); Coco v. BP Products North America, Inc., et al. (E.D. La.); Danos, et al. v. BP Exploration et al., Case No. 00060449 (25th Judicial Court, Parish of Plaquemines, Louisiana); Doom v. BP Exploration & Production, et al. , Case No. 12-cv-2048 (E.D. La.); Duong, et al., v. BP America Production Company, et al., Case No. 13-cv-00605 (E.D. La.); Esponge v. BP, P.L.C., et al., Case No. 0166367 (32nd Judicial District Court, Parish of Terrebonne, Louisiana); Ezell v. BP, plc, et al., Case No. 2:10-cv-01920-KDE-JCW (E.D. La.); Fitzgerald v. BP Exploration, et al., Case No. 13-cv-00650 (E.D. La.); Hill v. BP, plc, et al., Case No. 1:10-cv-00471-CG-N (S.D. Ala.); Hogan v. British Petroleum Exploration & Production, Inc., et al., Case No. 2012-22995 (District Court, Harris County, Texas); Hudley v. BP, plc, et al., Case No. 10-cv-00532-N (S.D. Ala.); In re of Jambon Supplier II, L.L.C., et al., Case No. 12-426 (E.D. La.); Kolian v. BP Exploration & Production, et al. , Case No. 12-cv-2338 (E.D. La.); Monroe v. BP, plc, et al., Case No. 1:10-cv-00472-M (S.D. Ala.); Pearson v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc., Case No. 2:11-cv-863, (E.D. La.); Shimer v. BP Exploration and Production, et al, Case No. 2:13-cv-4755 (E.D. La.); Top Water Charters, LLC v. BP, P.L.C., et al., No. 0165708 (32nd Judicial District Court, Parish of Terrebonne, Louisiana); Toups, et al. v Nalco Company, et al., Case No. 59-121 (25th Judicial District Court, Parish of Plaquemines, Louisiana); and, Trehern v. BP, plc, et al., Case No. 1:10-cv-00432-HSO-JMR (S.D. Miss.). The cases were filed on behalf of individuals and entities that own property, live, and/ or work in or derive income from the effected Coastal region. Each of the actions contains substantially similar allegations, generally alleging, among other things, negligence relating to the use of our COREXIT dispersant in connection with the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. The plaintiffs in these lawsuits are generally seeking awards of unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, and attorneys’ fees and costs.

 

Pursuant to orders issued by the court in MDL 2179, the claims were consolidated in several master complaints, including one naming Nalco Company and others who responded to the Gulf Oil Spill (known as the “B3 Master Complaint”). On May 18, 2012, Nalco filed a motion for summary judgment against the claims in the “B3” Master Complaint, on the grounds that: (i) Plaintiffs’ claims are preempted by the comprehensive oil spill response scheme set forth in the Clean Water Act and National Contingency Plan; and (ii) Nalco is entitled to derivative immunity from suit. On November 28, 2012, the Court granted Nalco’s motion and dismissed with prejudice the claims in the “B3” Master Complaint asserted against Nalco. The Court held that such claims were preempted by the Clean Water Act and National Contingency Plan. Because claims in the “B3” Master Complaint remain pending against other defendants, the Court’s decision is

 

57



 

not a “final judgment” for purposes of appeal. Under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a), plaintiffs will have 30 days after entry of final judgment to appeal the Court’s decision.

 

Nalco Company, the incident defendants and the other responder defendants have been named as first party defendants by Transocean Deepwater Drilling, Inc. and its affiliates (the “Transocean Entities”) (In re the Complaint and Petition of Triton Asset Leasing GmbH, et al, MDL No. 2179, Civil Action 10-2771). In April and May 2011, the Transocean Entities, Cameron International Corporation, Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., M-I L.L.C., Weatherford U.S., L.P. and Weatherford International, Inc. (collectively, the “Cross Claimants”) filed cross claims in MDL 2179 against Nalco Company and other unaffiliated cross defendants. The Cross Claimants generally allege, among other things, that if they are found liable for damages resulting from the Deepwater Horizon explosion, oil spill and/or spill response, they are entitled to indemnity or contribution from the cross defendants.

 

In April and June 2011, in support of its defense of the claims against it, Nalco Company filed counterclaims against the Cross Claimants. In its counterclaims, Nalco Company generally alleges that if it is found liable for damages resulting from the Deepwater Horizon explosion, oil spill and/or spill response, it is entitled to contribution or indemnity from the Cross Claimants.

 

In December 2012 and January 2013, the MDL 2179 court issued final orders approving two settlements between BP and Plaintiffs’ Class Counsel: (1) a proposed Medical Benefits Class Action Settlement; and (2) a proposed Economic and Property Damages Class Action Settlement. Pursuant to the proposed settlements, class members agree to release claims against BP and other released parties, including Nalco Energy Services, LP, Nalco Holding Company, Nalco Finance Holdings LLC, Nalco Finance Holdings Inc., Nalco Holdings LLC and Nalco Company.

 

Other Related Actions

 

In March 2011, Nalco Company was named, along with other unaffiliated defendants, in an amended complaint filed by an individual in the Circuit Court of Harrison County, Mississippi, Second Judicial District (Franks v. Sea Tow of South Miss, Inc., et al., Cause No. A2402-10-228 (Circuit Court of Harrison County, Mississippi)). The amended complaint generally asserts, among other things, negligence and strict product liability claims relating to the plaintiff’s alleged exposure to chemical dispersants manufactured by Nalco Company. The plaintiff seeks unspecified compensatory damages, medical expenses, and attorneys’ fees and costs. Plaintiff’s allegations place him within the scope of the MDL 2179 Medical Benefits Class. In approving the Medical Benefits Settlement, the MDL 2179 Court barred Medical Benefits Settlement class members from prosecuting claims of injury from exposure to oil and dispersants related to the Response. As a result of the MDL court’s order, on April 11, 2013, the Mississippi court stayed proceedings in the Franks case.

 

The company believes the claims asserted against Nalco Company are without merit and intends to defend these lawsuits vigorously. The company also believes that it has rights to contribution and/ or indemnification (including legal expenses) from third parties. However, the company cannot predict the outcome of these lawsuits, the involvement it might have in these matters in the future, or the potential for future litigation.

 

16. RETIREMENT PLANS

 

Pension and Postretirement Health Care Benefits Plans

 

As part of the merger with Nalco, the company assumed sponsorship of the Nalco qualified and non-qualified pension and other postretirement benefit plans. As part of the acquisition of Champion, the company assumed sponsorship of Champion’s international defined benefit pension plans, the impact of which was not significant.

 

The company has a non-contributory qualified defined benefit pension plan covering most of its U.S. employees. The company also has U.S. non-contributory non-qualified defined benefit plans, which provide for benefits to employees in excess of limits permitted under its U.S. pension plan. The Nalco U.S. qualified pension plan merged into the Ecolab U.S. qualified pension plan effective December 31, 2012, and certain Nalco employees became eligible to participate in the merged plan and the Ecolab non-qualified pension plan at that time. Certain Champion employees became eligible to participate in the U.S. qualified and non-qualified pension plans on January 1, 2014. The non-qualified plans are not funded and the recorded benefit obligation for the non-qualified plans was $96 million and $110 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The measurement date used for determining the U.S. pension plan assets and obligations is December 31.

 

Various international subsidiaries have defined benefit pension plans. International plans are funded based on local country requirements. The measurement date used for determining the international pension plan assets and obligations is November 30, the fiscal year-end of the company’s international affiliates.

 

The company provides postretirement health care benefits to certain U.S. employees. The corresponding plans are contributory based on years of service and family status, with retiree contributions adjusted annually. The measurement date used to determine the U.S. postretirement health care plan assets and obligations is December 31. Certain employees outside the U.S. are covered under government-sponsored programs, which are not required to be fully funded. The expense and obligation for providing international postretirement health care benefits are not significant.

 

58



 

The following table sets forth financial information related to the company’s pension and postretirement health care plans:

 

 

 

U.S.

 

INTERNATIONAL

 

U.S. POSTRETIREMENT

 

 

 

PENSION (a)

 

PENSION

 

HEALTH CARE

 

MILLIONS

 

2013

 

2012

 

2013

 

2012

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated Benefit Obligation, end of year

 

 

$  1,748.1

 

 

$  1,889.2

 

 

$  1,124.5

 

 

$  1,075.2

 

 

$     234.1

 

 

$     281.5

 

Projected Benefit Obligation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Projected benefit obligation, beginning of year

 

 

2,105.1

 

 

1,892.4

 

 

1,180.6

 

 

978.6

 

 

281.5

 

 

277.3

 

Service cost

 

 

68.6

 

 

50.5

 

 

36.0

 

 

29.6

 

 

5.9

 

 

5.1

 

Interest

 

 

84.7

 

 

89.3

 

 

47.2

 

 

48.3

 

 

10.8

 

 

12.9

 

Participant contributions

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.7

 

 

4.1

 

 

9.6

 

 

10.0

 

Medicare subsidies received

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.7

 

 

1.9

 

Curtailments and settlements

 

 

 

 

 

 

(7.3)

 

 

(4.8)

 

 

 

 

 

Plan amendments

 

 

 

 

(24.8)

 

 

2.2

 

 

(8.3)

 

 

 

 

(1.8)

 

Actuarial loss (gain)

 

 

(270.5)

 

 

173.0

 

 

(11.1)

 

 

165.5

 

 

(52.2)

 

 

0.7

 

Assumed through acquisitions

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.5

 

 

6.9

 

 

 

 

 

Benefits paid

 

 

(101.6)

 

 

(75.3)

 

 

(39.2)

 

 

(35.2)

 

 

(22.2)

 

 

(24.6)

 

Foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

23.0

 

 

(4.1)

 

 

 

 

 

Projected benefit obligation, end of year

 

 

1,886.3

 

 

2,105.1

 

 

1,243.6

 

 

1,180.6

 

 

234.1

 

 

281.5

 

Plan Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets, beginning of year

 

 

1,633.5

 

 

1,352.1

 

 

689.3

 

 

612.6

 

 

15.1

 

 

16.6

 

Actual returns on plan assets

 

 

307.3

 

 

174.0

 

 

64.7

 

 

57.3

 

 

2.8

 

 

1.9

 

Company contributions

 

 

9.7

 

 

182.7

 

 

52.6

 

 

52.5

 

 

17.7

 

 

19.7

 

Participant contributions

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.7

 

 

4.1

 

 

1.4

 

 

1.5

 

Assumed through acquisitions

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Settlements

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1.5)

 

 

(3.5)

 

 

 

 

 

Benefits paid

 

 

(101.6)

 

 

(75.3)

 

 

(39.2)

 

 

(35.2)

 

 

(22.2)

 

 

(24.6)

 

Foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

12.1

 

 

1.5

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets, end of year

 

 

1,848.9

 

 

1,633.5

 

 

787.6

 

 

689.3

 

 

14.8

 

 

15.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Funded Status, end of year

 

 

(37.4)

 

 

(471.6)

 

 

(456.0)

 

 

(491.3)

 

 

(219.3)

 

 

(266.4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheet:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other assets

 

 

58.6

 

 

 

 

31.6

 

 

7.0

 

 

 

 

 

Other current liabilities

 

 

(6.8)

 

 

(9.8)

 

 

(14.6)

 

 

(13.1)

 

 

(6.0)

 

 

(7.4)

 

Postretirement healthcare and pension benefits

 

 

(89.2)

 

 

(461.8)

 

 

(473.0)

 

 

(485.2)

 

 

(213.3)

 

 

(259.0)

 

Net liability

 

 

(37.4)

 

 

(471.6)

 

 

(456.0)

 

 

(491.3)

 

 

(219.3)

 

 

(266.4)

 

Amounts recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (Income):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrecognized net actuarial loss

 

 

258.1

 

 

769.1

 

 

198.5

 

 

241.3

 

 

(42.3)

 

 

12.3

 

Unrecognized net prior service benefits

 

 

(47.5)

 

 

(54.5)

 

 

(3.0)

 

 

(7.1)

 

 

(1.2)

 

 

(1.5)

 

Tax benefit

 

 

(85.9)

 

 

(273.0)

 

 

(56.1)

 

 

(67.1)

 

 

14.4

 

 

(5.7)

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss (income), net of tax

 

 

124.7

 

 

441.6

 

 

139.4

 

 

167.1

 

 

(29.1)

 

 

5.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (Income):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization of net actuarial loss

 

 

(62.3)

 

 

(45.1)

 

 

(17.7)

 

 

(6.2)

 

 

(0.6)

 

 

(0.4)

 

Amortization of prior service costs (benefits)

 

 

6.9

 

 

4.2

 

 

1.4

 

 

(0.3)

 

 

0.3

 

 

(0.1)

 

Current period net actuarial loss (gain)

 

 

(447.7)

 

 

126.2

 

 

(28.7)

 

 

143.4

 

 

(54.0)

 

 

(0.1)

 

Current period prior service costs (benefits)

 

 

 

 

(24.8)

 

 

2.2

 

 

(4.3)

 

 

 

 

(1.8)

 

Settlement

 

 

(0.9)

 

 

(2.4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax expense (benefit)

 

 

187.1

 

 

(21.3)

 

 

11.0

 

 

(36.3)

 

 

20.1

 

 

0.5

 

Foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.1

 

 

1.3

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive loss (income)

 

 

(316.9)

 

 

36.8

 

 

(27.7)

 

 

97.6

 

 

(34.2)

 

 

(1.9)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(a)  Includes qualified and non-qualified plans

 

 

Estimated amounts in accumulated other comprehensive loss expected to be reclassified to net period cost during 2014 are as follows:

 

 

 

U.S.

 

INTERNATIONAL

 

U. S. POSTRETIREMENT

 

MILLIONS

 

PENSION (a)

 

PENSION

 

HEALTH CARE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net actuarial loss (gain)

 

23.6

 

$

7.5

 

$

(8.3)

 

Net prior service costs (benefits)

 

(6.9)

 

0.5

 

(0.3)

 

Total

 

16.7

 

$

8.0

 

$

(8.6)

 

 

(a)  Includes qualified and non-qualified plans

 

59



 

The aggregate projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation and fair value of pension plan assets for plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets were as follows:

 

DECEMBER 31 (MILLIONS)

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aggregate projected benefit obligation

 

$

869.2

 

$

2,931.8

 

Accumulated benefit obligation

 

794.9

 

2,635.0

 

Fair value of plan assets

 

309.9

 

1,972.1

 

 

For 2013, these plans include the U.S. non-qualified pension plans which are not funded, as well as various international pension plans which are funded consistent with local practices and requirements. For 2012, these plans also include the U.S. qualified pension plan.

 

Net Periodic Benefit Costs

 

Pension and postretirement health care benefits expense for the company’s operations are as follows:

 

 

 

U.S.

 

INTERNATIONAL

 

U.S. POSTRETIREMENT

 

 

 

PENSION (a)

 

PENSION

 

HEALTH CARE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MILLIONS

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

Service cost — employee benefits earned during the year

 

$

68.6

 

$

50.5

 

$

46.7

 

$

36.0

 

$

29.6

 

$

23.1

 

$

5.9

 

$

5.1

 

$

2.2

 

Interest cost on benefit obligation

 

84.7

 

89.3

 

63.4

 

47.2

 

48.3

 

28.2

 

10.8

 

12.9

 

9.0

 

Expected return on plan assets

 

(130.1

)

(127.1

)

(100.6

)

(46.9

)

(42.3

)

(22.5

)

(1.1

)

(1.2

)

(1.4

)

Recognition of net actuarial loss

 

62.3

 

45.1

 

31.8

 

11.3

 

3.9

 

5.7

 

0.6

 

0.4

 

0.2

 

Amortization of prior service cost (benefit)

 

(6.9

)

(4.2

)

(4.2

)

(0.3

)

0.2

 

0.1

 

(0.3

)

0.1

 

0.1

 

Settlements/Curtailments

 

0.9

 

2.4

 

 

(0.3

)

1.6

 

1.3

 

 

 

 

Total expense

 

$

79.5

 

$

56.0

 

$

37.1

 

$

47.0

 

$

41.3

 

$

35.9

 

$

15.9

 

$

17.3

 

$

10.1

 

 

(a) Includes qualified and non-qualified plans

 

Plan Assumptions

 

U.S.

 

INTERNATIONAL

 

U.S. POSTRETIREMENT

 

 

 

PENSION (a)

 

PENSION

 

HEALTH CARE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PERCENT

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

Weighted-average actuarial assumptions used to determine benefit obligations as of year end:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discount rate

 

4.92%

 

4.14%

 

4.86%

 

4.09%

 

4.04%

 

5.02%

 

4.77%

 

3.95%

 

4.80%

 

Projected salary increase

 

4.32

 

4.32

 

4.08

 

2.73

 

2.74

 

2.98

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-average actuarial assumptions used to determine net cost:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discount rate

 

4.14

 

4.85

 

5.23

 

5.57

 

5.66

 

4.26

 

3.95

 

4.80

 

5.34

 

Expected return on plan assets

 

8.25

 

8.25

 

8.44

 

6.79

 

6.87

 

6.37

 

8.25

 

8.25

 

8.50

 

Projected salary increase

 

4.32

 

4.08

 

4.07

 

3.66

 

3.59

 

3.62

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(a) Includes qualified and non-qualified plans

 

The discount rate assumptions for the U.S. plans are developed using a bond yield curve constructed from a population of high-quality, non-callable, corporate bond issues with maturities ranging from six months to thirty years. A discount rate is estimated for the U.S. plans and is based on the durations of the underlying plans.

 

The expected long-term rate of return used for the U.S. plans is generally based on the pension plan’s asset mix. The company considers expected long-term real returns on asset categories, expectations for inflation, and estimates of the impact of active management of the assets in coming to the final rate to use. The company also considers actual historical returns.

 

The expected long-term rate of return used for the company’s international plans is determined in each local jurisdiction and is based on the assets held in that jurisdiction, the expected rate of returns for the type of assets held and any guaranteed rate of return provided by the investment. The other assumptions used to measure the international pension obligations, including discount rate, vary by country based on specific local requirements and information. As previously noted, the measurement date for these plans is November 30.

 

For postretirement benefit measurement purposes as of December 31, 2013, the annual rates of increase in the per capita cost of covered health care were assumed to be 7.5%. The rates were assumed to decrease each year until they reach 5% in 2023 and remain at those levels thereafter. Health care costs for certain employees which are eligible for subsidy by the company are limited by a cap on the subsidy.

 

60



 

Assumed health care cost trend rates have an effect on the amounts reported for the company’s U.S. postretirement health care benefits plan. A one-percentage point change in the assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:

 

 

 

1-PERCENTAGE POINT

 

MILLIONS

 

INCREASE

 

DECREASE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effect on total of service and interest cost components

 

$

(0.4)

 

$

0.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effect on postretirement benefit obligation

 

2.4

 

(2.3)

 

 

Plan Asset Management

 

The company’s U.S. investment strategy and policies are designed to maximize the possibility of having sufficient funds to meet the long-term liabilities of the pension fund, while achieving a balance between the goals of asset growth of the plan and keeping risk at a reasonable level. Current income is not a key goal of the plan. The asset allocation position reflects the ability and willingness to accept relatively more short-term variability in the performance of the pension plan portfolio in exchange for the expectation of better long-term returns, lower pension costs and better funded status in the long run.

 

The pension fund is diversified across a number of asset classes and securities. Selected individual portfolios within the asset classes may be undiversified while maintaining the diversified nature of total plan assets. The company has no significant concentration of risk in its U.S. plan assets.

 

Assets of funded retirement plans outside the U.S. are managed in each local jurisdiction and asset allocation strategy is set in accordance with local rules, regulations and practice. Therefore, no overall target asset allocation is presented. Although non-U.S. equity securities are all considered international for the company, some equity securities are considered domestic for the local plan. The funds are invested in a variety of equities, bonds and real estate investments and, in some cases, the assets are managed by insurance companies which may offer a guaranteed rate of return. The company has no significant concentration of risk in its international plan assets.

 

The discussion that follows references the fair value measurements in terms of Levels 1, 2 and 3. See Note 7 for definitions of these levels. Plan assets by Level are as follows:

 

Level 1 - Cash, and certain equity securities and fixed income : Valued at the quoted market prices of shares held by the plans at year-end in the active market on which the individual securities are traded.

 

Level 2 - Real estate, insurance contracts, and certain equity securities and fixed income : Valued based on inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the securities.

 

Level 3 - Hedge funds and private equity : Valued based on the net asset values of the underlying partnerships. The net asset values of the partnerships are based on the fair values of the underlying investments of the partnerships. Quoted market prices are used to value the underlying investments of the partnerships, where available.

 

U.S. Assets

 

The allocation and fair value of the company’s U.S. plan assets for its defined benefit pension and postretirement health care benefit plans are as follows:

 

 

 

TARGET

 

 

 

 

 

ASSET

 

ASSET

 

 

 

 

 

CATEGORY

 

ALLOCATION

 

PERCENTAGE

 

 

 

PERCENTAGE

 

OF PLAN ASSETS

 

DECEMBER 31 (%)

 

2013

 

2012

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Large cap equity

 

34%

 

34%

 

37%

 

36%

 

Small cap equity

 

9

 

9

 

11

 

10

 

International equity

 

13

 

13

 

14

 

14

 

Fixed income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Core fixed income

 

18

 

18

 

17

 

19

 

High-yield bonds

 

5

 

5

 

5

 

5

 

Emerging markets

 

2

 

2

 

2

 

2

 

Other:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate

 

4

 

4

 

3

 

3

 

Hedge funds

 

9

 

9

 

8

 

8

 

Private equity

 

6

 

6

 

3

 

3

 

Total

 

100%

 

100%

 

100%

 

100%

 

 

 

 

FAIR VALUE AS OF

 

MILLIONS

 

DECEMBER 31, 2013

 

 

 

LEVEL 1

 

LEVEL 2

 

LEVEL 3

 

TOTAL

 

Cash

 

$

3.1

 

 

 

 

 

$

3.1

 

Equity securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Large cap equity

 

695.2

 

 

 

 

 

695.2

 

Small cap equity

 

196.9

 

 

 

 

 

196.9

 

International equity

 

258.5

 

 

 

 

 

258.5

 

Fixed income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Core fixed income

 

323.2

 

 

 

 

 

323.2

 

High-yield bonds

 

88.4

 

 

 

 

 

88.4

 

Emerging markets

 

29.8

 

 

 

 

 

29.8

 

Other:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate

 

 

 

$

64.7

 

 

 

64.7

 

Hedge funds

 

 

 

 

 

$

148.5

 

148.5

 

Private equity

 

 

 

 

 

54.9

 

54.9

 

Other

 

 

 

0.5

 

 

 

0.5

 

Total

 

$

1,595.1

 

$

65.2

 

$

203.4

 

$

1,863.7

 

 

 

 

FAIR VALUE AS OF

 

MILLIONS

 

DECEMBER 31, 2012

 

 

 

LEVEL 1

 

LEVEL 2

 

LEVEL 3

 

TOTAL

 

Cash

 

$

8.8

 

 

 

 

 

$

8.8

 

Equity securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Large cap equity

 

594.2

 

 

 

 

 

594.2

 

Small cap equity

 

159.9

 

 

 

 

 

159.9

 

International equity

 

223.7

 

 

 

 

 

223.7

 

Fixed income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Core fixed income

 

308.9

 

 

 

 

 

308.9

 

High-yield bonds

 

81.8

 

 

 

 

 

81.8

 

Emerging markets

 

32.6

 

 

 

 

 

32.6

 

Other:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Real estate

 

 

 

$

55.5

 

 

 

55.5

 

Hedge funds

 

 

 

 

 

$

134.6

 

134.6

 

Private equity

 

 

 

 

 

48.2

 

48.2

 

Other

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

 

0.4

 

Total

 

$

1,409.9

 

$

55.9

 

$

182.8

 

$

1,648.6

 

 

61



 

For those assets that are valued using significant unobservable inputs (level 3), the following is a rollforward of the significant activity for the year:

 

 

 

HEDGE

 

PRIVATE

 

 

MILLIONS

 

FUNDS

 

EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2011

 

$

127.1

 

$

41.5

 

 

Unrealized gains

 

7.5

 

1.0

 

 

Realized gains

 

 

3.3

 

 

Purchases, sales and settlements, net

 

 

2.4

 

 

Transfers in and/or out

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2012

 

$

134.6

 

$

48.2

 

 

Unrealized gains

 

13.9

 

6.2

 

 

Realized gains

 

 

3.6

 

 

Purchases, sales and settlements, net

 

 

(3.1

)

 

Transfers in and/or out

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

 

$

148.5

 

$

54.9

 

 

 

The company is responsible for the valuation process and seeks to obtain quoted market prices for all securities. When quoted market prices are not available, a number of methodologies are used to establish fair value estimates, including discounted cash flow models, prices from recently executed transactions of similar securities or broker/dealer quotes using market observable information to the extent possible. The company reviews the values generated by those models for reasonableness and, in some cases, further analyzes and researches values generated to ensure their accuracy, which includes reviewing other publicly available information.

 

International Assets

 

The allocation of plan assets and fair value of the company’s international plan assets for its defined benefit pension plans are as follows:

 

ASSET

 

PERCENTAGE

 

CATEGORY

 

OF PLAN ASSETS

 

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DECEMBER 31 (%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

1%

 

 

1%

 

Equity securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

International equity

 

43

 

 

42

 

Fixed income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate bonds

 

21

 

 

23

 

Government bonds

 

18

 

 

18

 

Total fixed income

 

39

 

 

41

 

Other:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Insurance contracts

 

15

 

 

14

 

Real estate

 

2

 

 

2

 

Total

 

100%

 

 

100%

 

 

 

 

 

 

FAIR VALUE AS OF

 

 

 

MILLIONS

 

 

 

DECEMBER 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

LEVEL 1

 

LEVEL 2

 

LEVEL 3

 

TOTAL

 

Cash

 

$

3.6

 

 

 

 

 

$

3.6

 

Equity securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

International equity

 

 

 

$

342.5

 

 

 

342.5

 

Fixed income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate bonds

 

5.5

 

162.1

 

 

 

167.6

 

Government bonds

 

8.7

 

134.6

 

 

 

143.3

 

Other:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Insurance contracts

 

 

 

116.2

 

 

 

116 .2

 

Real estate

 

 

 

11.4

 

 

 

11.4

 

Other

 

2.6

 

0.4

 

 

 

3.0

 

Total

 

$

20.4

 

$

767.2

 

 

 

$

787.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

FAIR VALUE AS OF

 

 

 

MILLIONS

 

 

 

DECEMBER 31, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

LEVEL 1

 

LEVEL 2

 

LEVEL 3

 

TOTAL

 

Cash

 

$

8.0

 

 

 

 

 

$

8.0

 

Equity securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

International equity

 

 

 

$

288.8

 

 

 

288.8

 

Fixed income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate bonds

 

5.2

 

150.7

 

 

 

155.9

 

Government bonds

 

8.1

 

117.4

 

 

 

125.5

 

Other:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Insurance contracts

 

 

 

96.4

 

 

 

96.4

 

Real estate

 

 

 

10.7

 

 

 

10.7

 

Other

 

0.5

 

3.5

 

 

 

4.0

 

Total

 

$

21.8

 

$

667.5

 

 

 

$

689.3

 

 

Multiemployer Plan

 

The company has historically contributed to a multiemployer defined benefit pension plan (“MEPP”) under the terms of a collective-bargaining agreement that covers certain union-represented former employees. The company contributed $0.2 million, $0.5 million and $0.4 million during 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively to its MEPP.

 

During the fourth quarter of 2012 the company determined that a withdrawal from the MEPP was probable and based on the underfunded status of the MEPP recorded an estimated withdrawal liability of $4.7 million. During 2013, the company withdrew from the MEPP and as of December 31, 2013, the present value of the company’s withdrawal liability to the MEPP was $4.6 million.

 

The risks of participating in a MEPP are different from single-employer pension plans such that assets contributed to the MEPP by one employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers. Additionally, if a participating employer stops contributing to the MEPP, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be borne by the remaining participating employers. Participation in the MEPP is not considered significant to the company as a whole.

 

Cash Flows

 

As of year-end 2013, the company’s estimate of benefits expected to be paid in each of the next five fiscal years and in the aggregate for the five fiscal years thereafter for the company’s pension and postretirement health care benefit plans are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

MEDICARE SUBSIDY

 

MILLIONS

 

ALL PLANS

 

RECEIPTS

 

2014

 

$

169

 

$

2

 

2015

 

175

 

2

 

2016

 

178

 

 

2017

 

185

 

 

2018

 

191

 

 

2019-2023

 

1,101

 

 

 

Depending on plan funding levels, the U.S. defined benefit qualified pension plan provides certain terminating participants with an option to receive their pension benefits in the form of lump sum payments. This option resulted in a settlement charge of $2.4 million, recorded in special (gains) and charges in the fourth quarter of 2012.

 

The company is currently in compliance with all funding requirements of its U.S. pension and postretirement health care plans.

 

No voluntary contributions were made to the merged U.S. pension plan during 2013. Based on plan asset values as of December 31, 2011, the company was required to make contributions of $38 million to its Nalco U.S. pension plan during 2012. During 2012, a total of $180 million was funded to the Nalco U.S. pension plan. In the first quarter of 2011, the company made a $100 million voluntary contribution to its Ecolab U.S. pension plan.

 

62



 

The company seeks to maintain an asset balance that meets the long-term funding requirements identified by the projections of the pension plan’s actuaries while simultaneously satisfying the fiduciary responsibilities prescribed in ERISA. The company also takes into consideration the tax deductibility of contributions to the benefit plans.

 

The company is not aware of any expected refunds of plan assets within the next twelve months from any of its existing U.S. or international pension or postretirement benefit plans.

 

Savings Plan, ESOP and Profit Sharing

 

Legacy Ecolab & Legacy Nalco

 

The company provides a 401(k) savings plan for the majority of its legacy Ecolab and legacy Nalco U.S. employees.

 

On January 1, 2013, a new plan benefiting active employees accruing a final average pay or legacy cash balance pension benefit was spun off from the Ecolab Savings Plan and ESOP (the “Ecolab Plan”). Under the new plan, employee 401(k) contributions of up to 3% of eligible compensation are matched 100% by the company and employee 401(k) contributions over 3% and up to 5% of eligible compensation are matched 50% by the company.

 

All other active legacy Ecolab U.S. employees remain in the Ecolab Plan and beginning January 1, 2013, received a 100% match on 401(k) contributions of up to 4% of eligible compensation and a 50% match on 401(k) contributions of over 4% and up to 8% of eligible compensation.

 

On August 2, 2013 the legacy Nalco Company Profit Sharing and Saving Plan (the “Nalco Plan”) merged into the Ecolab Plan and eligible legacy Nalco employees began receiving matching contributions as discussed above. Prior to the merger of the plans, beginning January 1, 2013, eligible legacy Nalco employees received a 100% match on 401(k) contributions of up to 4% of eligible compensation and a 50% match on 401(k) contributions of over 4% and up to 8% of eligible compensation. Prior to January 1, 2013, the Nalco Plan provided for matching contributions of up to 4% of eligible compensation for employees who elected to contribute to 401(k) accounts and annual profit sharing contributions based on the company’s financial performance. Profit sharing contributions were no longer made for plan years after December 31, 2012.

 

The company’s matching contributions are 100% vested immediately. The company’s matching contribution expense for legacy Ecolab and legacy Nalco employees was $54 million, $43 million and $25 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The company’s profit sharing expense for legacy Nalco employee was $13 million and $1 million in 2012 and 2011 respectively.

 

Legacy Champion

 

A wholly-owned subsidiary of the company provides a 401(k) savings plan for qualified legacy Champion and Corsitech employees (“Champion Plan”). The Champion Plan was merged into the Ecolab Plan as of December 31, 2013, and beginning January 1, 2014 legacy Champion and Corsitech employees will receive the Ecolab Plan matching contribution described above.

 

Prior to January 1, 2014, the Champion Plan provided a discretionary matching contribution of 100% on 401(k) contributions of up to 3% of eligible compensation and 50% on 401(k) contributions of over 3% and up to 6% of eligible compensation.

 

Ecolab’s matching contribution to the Champion Plan during 2013, since the close of the Champion acquisition in April 2013, was $5 million.

 

17. OPERATING SEGMENTS AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

 

Effective in the first quarter of 2013, the company changed its reportable segments due to a change in its underlying organizational model designed to support the business following the Nalco merger and to facilitate global growth. The company did not operate under the realigned segment structure prior to 2013. The company’s new segment structure focuses on global businesses, with its ten operating units, which are also operating segments, aggregated into four reportable segments as follows:

 

Global Industrial - This reportable segment consists of the Global Water, Global Food & Beverage, Global Paper and Global Textile Care operating units. It provides water treatment and process applications, and cleaning and sanitizing solutions primarily to large industrial customers within the manufacturing, food and beverage processing, chemical, mining and primary metals, power generation, pulp and paper, and commercial laundry industries. The underlying operating units exhibit similar manufacturing processes, distribution methods and economic characteristics.

 

Global Institutional - This reportable segment consists of the Global Institutional, Global Specialty and Global Healthcare operating units. It provides specialized cleaning and sanitizing products to the foodservice, hospitality, lodging, healthcare, government and education and retail industries. The underlying operating units exhibit similar manufacturing processes, distribution methods and economic characteristics.

 

Global Energy - This reportable segment consists of the Global Energy operating unit. It serves the process chemicals and water treatment needs of the global petroleum and petrochemical industries in both upstream and downstream applications.

 

Other - This reportable segment consists of the Global Pest Elimination and Equipment Care operating units. It provides pest elimination and kitchen repair and maintenance, with its two operating units primarily fee-for-service businesses with similar economic characteristics.

 

For periods prior to its disposition in December 2012, the Vehicle Care operating unit was included within the Other reportable segment within the realigned reportable segment structure.

 

During the third quarter of 2013, the company’s management made a change to the way it measures and reports certain segments’ operating income, with intangible asset amortization specific to the Champion transaction moving to the Global Energy reportable segment from the Corporate segment. To provide meaningful comparisons, this change was made retroactively, resulting in $14.0 million of amortization expense moving to the Global Energy reportable segment from the Corporate segment for the second quarter of 2013. No other segments were impacted by this change.

 

Consistent with the company’s internal management reporting, and including the change discussed in the preceding paragraph, the Corporate segment includes intangible amortization specifically from the Nalco merger, and certain integration costs for both the Nalco and Champion transactions. The Corporate segment also includes special (gains) and charges reported on the Consolidated Statement of Income.

 

63



 

The profitability of the company’s operating units is evaluated by management based on operating income. The company has no intersegment revenues.

 

Reportable Segment Information

 

The company evaluates the performance of its international operations within its four reportable segments based on fixed currency exchange rates. The difference between the fixed currency exchange rates and the actual currency exchange rates is reported as “effect of foreign currency translation” in the following tables. All other accounting policies of the reportable segments are consistent with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the accounting policies of the company described in Note 2.

 

The following tables present net sales and operating income (loss) by reportable segment.

 

 

 

Net Sales

 

Operating Income (Loss)

 

MILLIONS

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Global Industrial

 

$

4,905.1

 

 

 $

4,762.2

 

$

2,036.6

 

 

$

637.3

 

 

$

569.5

 

$

234.3

 

Global Institutional

 

4,202.5

 

 

4,063.2

 

3,852.0

 

 

764.5

 

 

700.7

 

585.6

 

Global Energy

 

3,532.8

 

 

2,275.4

 

100.5

 

 

492.1

 

 

360.7

 

16.2

 

Other

 

715.0

 

 

736.3

 

701.4

 

 

97.9

 

 

103.0

 

96.6

 

Corporate

 

 

 

 

(29.6

)

 

(411.6

)

 

(442.3

)

(192.4

)

Subtotal at fixed currency rates

 

13,355.4

 

 

11,837.1

 

6,660.9

 

 

1,580.2

 

 

1,291.6

 

740.3

 

Effect of foreign currency translation

 

(102.0

)

 

1.6

 

137.6

 

 

(19.6

)

 

(2.3

)

13.5

 

Consolidated

 

$

13,253.4

 

 

 $

11,838.7

 

$

6,798.5

 

 

$

1,560.6

 

 

$

1,289.3

 

$

753.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The company has an integrated supply chain function that serves all of its reportable segments. As such asset and capital expenditure information by reportable segment has not been provided and is not available, since the company does not produce or utilize such information internally. In addition, although depreciation and amortization expense is a component of each reportable segment’s operating results, it is not discretely identifiable.

 

The company had two classes of products which comprised 10% or more of consolidated net sales in any of the last three years. Sales of warewashing products were approximately 10% of consolidated net sales in 2013, approximately 11% of consolidated net sales in 2012 and approximately 18% of consolidated net sales in 2011. Sales of laundry products were approximately 10% of consolidated net sales in 2011.

 

The vast majority of the company’s revenue is driven by the sale of its chemical products, with any corresponding service generally considered incidental to the product sale. The exception to this is the Global Pest Elimination and Equipment Care operating units, which are within the Other reportable segment and as previously noted, are primarily fee-for-service businesses. In addition, the Global Industrial, Global Institutional and Global Energy reportable segments derive a small amount of revenue directly from service offerings. All other service based revenue is insignificant.

 

Total service revenue at public exchange rates by reportable segment is shown below.

 

 

 

Service Revenue

 

(MILLIONS)

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Global Industrial

 

$

51.9

 

 

$

48.3

 

$

 

Global Institutional

 

27.0

 

 

23.8

 

24.3

 

Global Energy

 

179.3

 

 

156.0

 

 

Other

 

619.4

 

 

590.1

 

563.4

 

 

Geographic Information

 

 

Net sales and long-lived assets at public exchange rates by geographic region are as follows:

 

 

 

Net Sales

 

Long-Lived Assets, net

 

(MILLIONS)

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

2013

 

2012

 

United States

 

$

6,696.0

 

 

$

5,865.3

 

$

3,551.2

 

 

$

8,755.8

 

 

  $

7,100.3

 

EMEA

 

3,255.0

 

 

3,027.9

 

1,955.5

 

 

2,180.2

 

 

1,908.4

 

Asia Pacific

 

1,631.8

 

 

1,586.8

 

721.4

 

 

2,368.6

 

 

2,377.1

 

Latin America

 

1,022.6

 

 

849.7

 

321.2

 

 

832.4

 

 

714.3

 

Canada

 

648.0

 

 

509.0

 

249.2

 

 

801.1

 

 

580.2

 

Consolidated

 

$

13,253.4

 

 

$

11,838.7

 

$

6,798.5

 

 

$

14,938.1

 

 

  $

12,680.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales by geographic region were determined based on origin of sale. Geographic data for long-lived assets is based on physical location of those assets. There were no sales from a single foreign country or individual customer that were material to the company’s consolidated net sales.

 

64



 

18. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

 

 

 

 

FIRST

 

SECOND

 

THIRD

 

FOURTH

 

 

 

MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE

 

 

QUARTER

 

QUARTER

 

QUARTER

 

QUARTER

 

YEAR

 

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

 

$

2,872.1

 

$

3,337.8

 

$

3,484.0

 

$

3,559.5

 

$

13,253.4

 

Cost of sales (including special charges of $2.0, $15.2, $6.3 and $19.7 in Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4, respectively)

 

 

1,564.9

 

1,828.6

 

1,882.8

 

1,963.8

 

7,240.1

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

995.8

 

1,083.3

 

1,097.4

 

1,104.9

 

4,281.4

 

Special (gains) and charges

 

 

49.7

 

73.6

 

27.8

 

20.2

 

171.3

 

Operating income

 

 

261.7

 

352.3

 

476.0

 

470.6

 

1,560.6

 

Interest expense, net (including special charges of $2.2 and $0.3 in Q1 and Q2, respectively)

 

 

61.5

 

66.2

 

67.0

 

67.6

 

262.3

 

Income before income taxes

 

 

200.2

 

286.1

 

409.0

 

403.0

 

1,298.3

 

Provision for income taxes

 

 

39.2

 

70.3

 

101.8

 

113.4

 

324.7

 

Net income including noncontrolling interest

 

 

161.0

 

215.8

 

307.2

 

289.6

 

973.6

 

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest (including special charges of $0.5 in Q1)

 

 

1.4

 

2.7

 

(0.8)

 

2.5

 

5.8

 

Net income attributable to Ecolab

 

 

$

159.6

 

$

213.1

 

$

308.0

 

$

287.1

 

$

967.8

 

Earnings attributable to Ecolab per common share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

$

0.54

 

$

0.71

 

$

1.02

 

$

0.95

 

$

3.23

 

Diluted

 

 

$

0.53

 

$

0.69

 

$

1.00

 

$

0.93

 

$

3.16

 

Weighted-average common shares outstanding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

295.4

 

301.5

 

301.2

 

301.2

 

299.9

 

Diluted

 

 

300.9

 

307.4

 

307.2

 

307.5

 

305.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

2,810.9

 

$

2,958.7

 

$

3,023.3

 

$

3,045.8

 

$

11,838.7

 

Cost of sales (including special charges of $76.0, $3.1, $3.2 and $11.6 in Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4, respectively)

 

1,614.0

 

1,608.9

 

1,616.4

 

1,644.2

 

6,483.5

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

989.7

 

981.7

 

977.7

 

971.1

 

3,920.2

 

Special (gains) and charges

 

41.4

 

41.6

 

28.0

 

34.7

 

145.7

 

Operating income

 

165.8

 

326.5

 

401.2

 

395.8

 

1,289.3

 

Interest expense, net (including special charges of $18.2 and $1.1 in Q1 and Q4, respectively)

 

86.1

 

63.9

 

64.2

 

62.5

 

276.7

 

Income before income taxes

 

79.7

 

262.6

 

337.0

 

333.3

 

1,012.6

 

Provision for income taxes

 

35.6

 

79.2

 

97.7

 

98.8

 

311.3

 

Net income including noncontrolling interest

 

44.1

 

183.4

 

239.3

 

234.5

 

701.3

 

Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest (including special charges of $4.5 in Q1)

 

(5.6)

 

(1.1)

 

1.3

 

3.1

 

(2.3)

 

Net income attributable to Ecolab

 

$

49.7

 

$

184.5

 

$

238.0

 

$

231.4

 

$

703.6

 

Earnings attributable to Ecolab per common share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

0.17

 

$

0.63

 

$

0.81

 

$

0.79

 

$

2.41

 

Diluted

 

$

0.17

 

$

0.62

 

$

0.80

 

$

0.77

 

$

2.35

 

Weighted-average common shares outstanding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

291.5

 

291.9

 

292.7

 

293.8

 

292.5

 

Diluted

 

297.9

 

298.2

 

298.6

 

299.9

 

298.9

 

 

Per share amounts do not necessarily sum due to changes in the calculation of shares outstanding for each discrete period and rounding.

 

65



 

REPORTS OF MANAGEMENT

 

To our Shareholders:

 

Management’s Responsibility for Financial Statements

 

Management is responsible for the integrity and objectivity of the consolidated financial statements. The statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and, accordingly, include certain amounts based on management’s best estimates and judgments.

 

The Board of Directors, acting through its Audit Committee composed solely of independent directors, is responsible for determining that management fulfills its responsibilities in the preparation of financial statements and maintains internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee recommends to the Board of Directors the appointment of the company’s independent registered public accounting firm, subject to ratification by the shareholders. It meets regularly with management, the internal auditors and the independent registered public accounting firm.

 

The independent registered public accounting firm has audited the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report and have expressed their opinion regarding whether these consolidated financial statements present fairly in all material respects our financial position and results of operation and cash flows as stated in their report presented separately herein.

 

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, an evaluation of the design and operating effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting was conducted based on the 1992 framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on the evaluation under the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework, management concluded that internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2013.

 

On April 10, 2013, the company completed its acquisition of privately held Champion Technologies and its related company Corsicana Technologies (collectively “Champion”). See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. As permitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, companies may exclude acquisitions from their assessment of internal controls over financial reporting during the first year of acquisition and management elected to exclude Champion from its assessment of internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013. Champion’s total assets and total revenues represent approximately 4% and 8%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013.

 

The company’s independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, has audited the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013 as stated in their report which is included herein.

 

GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Douglas M. Baker, Jr.

Daniel J. Schmechel

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer

 

66



 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Ecolab Inc.:

 

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, equity and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Ecolab Inc. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in 1992. The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

As described in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management has excluded Champion from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013 because it was acquired by the Company in a purchase business combination during 2013. We have also excluded Champion from our audit of internal control over financial reporting. Champion is a wholly-owned subsidiary whose total assets and total revenues represent 4% and 8%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013.

 

GRAPHIC

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota

February 28, 2014

 

67



 

Summary Operating and Financial Data

 

DECEMBER 31 (MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AND EMPLOYEES)

 

 

2013

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States (including special (gains) and charges (1) )

 

 

$

6,696.0

 

 

$

5,865.3

 

$

3,551.2

 

$

3,170.4

 

International (at average rates of currency exchange)

 

 

6,557.4

 

 

5,973.4

 

3,247.3

 

2,919.3

 

Total

 

 

13,253.4

 

 

11,838.7

 

6,798.5

 

6,089.7

 

Cost of sales (including special (gains) and charges (2) )

 

 

7,240.1

 

 

6,483.5

 

3,475.6

 

3,013.8

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

4,281.4

 

 

3,920.2

 

2,438.1

 

2,261.6

 

Special (gains) and charges

 

 

171.3

 

 

145.7

 

131.0

 

7.5

 

Operating income

 

 

1,560.6

 

 

1,289.3

 

753.8

 

806.8

 

Gain on sale of equity investment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense, net (including special (gains) and charges (3) )

 

 

262.3

 

 

276.7

 

74.2

 

59.1

 

Income before income taxes

 

 

1,298.3

 

 

1,012.6

 

679.6

 

747.7

 

Provision for income taxes

 

 

324.7

 

 

311.3

 

216.3

 

216.6

 

Net income including noncontrolling interest

 

 

973.6

 

 

701.3

 

463.3

 

531.1

 

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(including special (gains) and charges (4) )

 

 

5.8

 

 

(2.3

)

0.8

 

0.8

 

Net income attributable to Ecolab

 

 

$

967.8

 

 

$

703.6

 

$

462.5

 

$

530.3

 

Earnings per share, as reported (GAAP)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted - net income

 

 

$

3.16

 

 

$

2.35

 

$

1.91

 

$

2.23

 

Earnings per share, as adjusted (Non-GAAP) (5)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted - net income

 

 

$

3.54

 

 

$

2.98

 

$

2.54

 

$

2.23

 

Weighted-average common shares outstanding - basic

 

 

299.9

 

 

292.5

 

236.9

 

233.4

 

Weighted-average common shares outstanding – diluted

 

 

305.9

 

 

298.9

 

242.1

 

237.6

 

SELECTED INCOME STATEMENT RATIOS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit

 

 

45.4

%

 

45.2

%

48.9

%

50.5

%

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

 

32.3

 

 

33.1

 

35.9

 

37.1

 

Operating income

 

 

11.8

 

 

10.9

 

11.1

 

13.2

 

Income before income taxes

 

 

9.8

 

 

8.6

 

10.0

 

12.3

 

Net income attributable to Ecolab

 

 

7.3

 

 

5.9

 

6.8

 

8.7

 

Effective income tax rate

 

 

25.0

%

 

30.7

%

31.8

%

29.0

%

FINANCIAL POSITION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

 

 

$

4,698.4

 

 

$

4,892.0

 

$

5,396.0

 

$

1,869.9

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

 

2,882.0

 

 

2,409.1

 

2,295.4

 

1,148.3

 

Goodwill, intangible and other assets

 

 

12,056.1

 

 

10,271.2

 

10,493.3

 

1,854.0

 

Total assets

 

 

$

19,636.5

 

 

$

17,572.3

 

$

18,184.7

 

$

4,872.2

 

Current liabilities

 

 

$

3,488.7

 

 

$

3,052.7

 

$

3,166.3

 

$

1,324.8

 

Long-term debt

 

 

6,043.5

 

 

5,736.1

 

6,613.2

 

656.4

 

Postretirement health care and pension benefits

 

 

795.6

 

 

1,220.5

 

1,173.4

 

565.8

 

Other liabilities

 

 

1,899.3

 

 

1,402.9

 

1,490.7

 

192.2

 

Total liabilities

 

 

12,227.1

 

 

11,412.2

 

12,443.6

 

2,739.2

 

Ecolab shareholders’ equity

 

 

7,344.3

 

 

6,077.0

 

5,666.7

 

2,129.2

 

Noncontrolling interest

 

 

65.1

 

 

83.1

 

74.4

 

3.8

 

Total equity

 

 

7,409.4

 

 

6,160.1

 

5,741.1

 

2,133.0

 

Total liabilities and equity

 

 

$

19,636.5

 

 

$

17,572.3

 

$

18,184.7

 

$

4,872.2

 

SELECTED CASH FLOW INFORMATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash provided by operating activities

 

 

$

1,559.8

 

 

$

1,203.0

 

$

685.5

 

$

950.4

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

816.2

 

 

714.5

 

395.7

 

347.9

 

Capital expenditures

 

 

625.1

 

 

574.5

 

341.7

 

260.5

 

Cash dividends declared per common share

 

 

$

0.9650

 

 

$

0.8300

 

$

0.7250

 

$

0.6400

 

SELECTED FINANCIAL MEASURES/OTHER

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total debt

 

 

$

6,904.5

 

 

$

6,541.9

 

$

7,636.2

 

$

845.6

 

Total debt to capitalization

 

 

48.2

%

 

51.5

%

57.1

%

28.4

%

Book value per common share

 

 

$

24.39

 

 

$

20.62

 

$

19.41

 

$

9.16

 

Return on beginning equity

 

 

15.8

%

 

12.2

%

21.7

%

26.5

%

Dividends per share/diluted earnings per common share

 

 

30.5

%

 

35.3

%

38.0

%

28.7

%

Net interest coverage

 

 

5.9

 

 

4.7

 

10.2

 

13.7

 

Year end market capitalization

 

 

$

31,399.4

 

 

$

21,190.5

 

$

16,879.0

 

$

11,723.3

 

Annual common stock price range

 

 

$

108.34-71.99

 

 

$

72.79-57.44

 

$

58.13-43.81

 

$

52.46-40.66

 

Number of employees

 

 

45,415

 

 

40,860

 

40,200

 

26,494

 

 

68



 

DECEMBER 31 (MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AND EMPLOYEES)

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

2003

 

OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States (including special (gains) and charges (1) )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

International (at average rates of currency exchange)

 

$

3,112.7

 

$

3,130.1

 

$

2,801.3

 

$

2,562.8

 

$

2,327.4

 

$

2,135.7

 

$

2,014.8

 

Total

 

2,787.9

 

3,007.4

 

2,668.3

 

2,333.0

 

2,207.4

 

2,049.3

 

1,747.0

 

Cost of sales (including special (gains) and charges (2) )

 

5,900.6

 

6,137.5

 

5,469.6

 

4,895.8

 

4,534.8

 

4,185.0

 

3,761.8

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

2,978.0

 

3,141.6

 

2,691.7

 

2,416.1

 

2,248.8

 

2,033.5

 

1,846.6

 

Special (gains) and charges

 

2,174.2

 

2,257.2

 

2,089.2

 

1,866.7

 

1,743.0

 

1,656.1

 

1,458.7

 

Operating income

 

67.1

 

25.9

 

19.7

 

 

 

 

 

4.5

 

0.4

 

Gain on sale of equity investment

 

681.3

 

712.8

 

669.0

 

613.0

 

543.0

 

490.9

 

456.1

 

Interest expense, net (including special (gains) and charges (3) )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11.1

 

Income before income taxes

 

61.2

 

61.6

 

51.0

 

44.4

 

44.2

 

45.3

 

45.3

 

Provision for income taxes

 

620.1

 

651.2

 

618.0

 

568.6

 

498.8

 

445.6

 

421.9

 

Net income including noncontrolling interest

 

201.4

 

202.8

 

189.1

 

198.6

 

178.7

 

161.9

 

160.2

 

Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

418.7

 

448.4

 

428.9

 

370.0

 

320.1

 

283.7

 

261.7

 

(including special (gains) and charges (4) )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income attributable to Ecolab

 

1.4

 

0.3

 

1.7

 

1.4

 

0.6

 

1.0

 

1.1

 

Earnings per share, as reported (GAAP)

 

$

417.3

 

$

448.1

 

$

427.2

 

$

368.6

 

$

319.5

 

$

282.7

 

$

260.6

 

Diluted - net income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per share, as adjusted (Non-GAAP) (5)

 

$

1.74

 

$

1.80

 

$

1.70

 

$

1.43

 

$

1.23

 

$

1.09

 

$

0.99

 

Diluted - net income

 

$

1.99

 

$

1.86

 

$

1.66

 

$

1.43

 

$

1.24

 

$

1.09

 

$

0.96

 

Weighted-average common shares outstanding — basic

 

236.7

 

245.4

 

246.8

 

252.1

 

255.7

 

257.6

 

259.5

 

Weighted-average common shares outstanding — diluted

 

239.9

 

249.3

 

251.8

 

257.1

 

260.1

 

260.4

 

262.7

 

SELECTED INCOME STATEMENT RATIOS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit

 

49.5

%

48.8

%

50.8

%

50.7

%

50.4

%

51.4

%

50.9

%

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 

36.8

 

36.8

 

38.2

 

38.1

 

38.4

 

39.6

 

38.8

 

Operating income

 

11.5

 

11.6

 

12.2

 

12.5

 

12.0

 

11.7

 

12.1

 

Income before income taxes

 

10.5

 

10.6

 

11.3

 

11.6

 

11.0

 

10.6

 

11.2

 

Net income attributable to Ecolab

 

7.1

 

7.3

 

7.8

 

7.5

 

7.0

 

6.8

 

6.9

 

Effective income tax rate

 

32.5

%

31.1

%

30.6

%

34.9

%

35.8

%

36.3

%

38.0

%

FINANCIAL POSITION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

 

$

1,814.2

 

$

1,691.1

 

$

1,717.3

 

$

1,853.6

 

$

1,421.7

 

$

1,279.1

 

$

1,150.3

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

1,176.2

 

1,135.2

 

1,083.4

 

951.6

 

868.0

 

867.0

 

769.1

 

Goodwill, intangible and other assets

 

2,030.5

 

1,930.6

 

1,922.1

 

1,614.2

 

1,506.9

 

1,570.1

 

1,309.5

 

Total assets

 

$

5,020.9

 

$

4,756.9

 

$

4,722.8

 

$

4,419.4

 

$

3,796.6

 

$

3,716.2

 

$

3,228.9

 

Current liabilities

 

$

1,250.2

 

$

1,441.9

 

$

1,518.3

 

$

1,502.8

 

$

1,119.4

 

$

939.6

 

$

851.9

 

Long-term debt

 

868.8

 

799.3

 

599.9

 

557.1

 

519.4

 

645.5

 

604.4

 

Postretirement health care and pension benefits

 

603.7

 

680.2

 

418.5

 

420.2

 

302.0

 

270.9

 

249.9

 

Other liabilities

 

288.6

 

256.5

 

243.2

 

252.7

 

201.7

 

257.3

 

195.9

 

Total liabilities

 

3,011.3

 

3,177.9

 

2,779.9

 

2,732.9

 

2,142.5

 

2,113.3

 

1,902.1

 

Ecolab shareholders’ equity

 

2,000.9

 

1,571.6

 

1,935.7

 

1,680.2

 

1,649.2

 

1,598.1

 

1,321.1

 

Noncontrolling interest

 

8.7

 

7.4

 

7.2

 

6.4

 

4.9

 

4.8

 

5.7

 

Total equity

 

2,009.6

 

1,579.0

 

1,942.9

 

1,686.6

 

1,654.1

 

1,602.9

 

1,326.8

 

Total liabilities and equity

 

$

5,020.9

 

$

4,756.9

 

$

4,722.8

 

$

4,419.4

 

$

3,796.6

 

$

3,716.2

 

$

3,228.9

 

SELECTED CASH FLOW INFORMATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash provided by operating activities

 

$

695.0

 

$

753.2

 

$

797.6

 

$

627.6

 

$

590.1

 

$

570.9

 

$

523.9

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

334.3

 

334.7

 

291.9

 

268.6

 

256.9

 

247.0

 

228.1

 

Capital expenditures

 

252.5

 

326.7

 

306.5

 

287.9

 

268.8

 

275.9

 

212.0

 

Cash dividends declared per common share

 

$

0.5750

 

$

0.5300

 

$

0.4750

 

$

0.4150

 

$

0.3625

 

$

0.3275

 

$

0.2975

 

SELECTED FINANCIAL MEASURES/OTHER

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total debt

 

$

967.3

 

$

1,138.2

 

$

1,003.4

 

$

1,066.1

 

$

746.3

 

$

701.6

 

$

674.6

 

Total debt to capitalization

 

32.5

%

41.9

%

34.1

%

38.7

%

31.1

%

30.4

%

33.7

%

Book value per common share

 

$

8.46

 

$

6.65

 

$

7.84

 

$

6.69

 

$

6.49

 

$

6.21

 

$

5.13

 

Return on beginning equity

 

26.6

%

23.1

%

25.4

%

22.4

%

20.0

%

21.4

%

23.3

%

Dividends per share/diluted earnings per common share

 

33.1

%

29.4

%

27.9

%

29.0

%

29.5

%

30.0

%

30.1

%

Net interest coverage

 

11.1

 

11.6

 

13.1

 

13.8

 

12.3

 

10.8

 

10.1

 

Year end market capitalization

 

$

10,547.4

 

$

8,301.7

 

$

12,639.9

 

$

11,360.4

 

$

9,217.8

 

$

9,047.5

 

$

7,045.5

 

Annual common stock price range

 

$

47.88-29.27

 

$

52.35-29.56

 

$

52.78-37.01

 

$

46.40-33.64

 

$

37.15-30.68

 

$

35.59-26.12

 

$

27.92-23.08

 

Number of employees

 

25,931

 

26,568

 

26,052

 

23,130

 

22,404

 

21,338

 

20,826

 

 

On April 10, 2013 and on December 1, 2011, the company completed its acquisition of Champion and merger with Nalco, respectively, which significantly impacts the comparability of certain 2013, 2012 and 2011 financial data against prior years. (1) U.S. Net sales includes special charges of $29.6 in 2011. (2) Cost of sales includes special charges of $43.2 in 2013, $93.9 in 2012, $8.9 in 2011, $12.6 in 2009, ($0.1) in 2004 and ($0.1) in 2003. (3)  Interest expense, net includes special charges of $2.5 in 2013, $19.3 in 2012 and $1.5 in 2011. (4) Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest includes special charges of $0.5 in 2013 and $4.5 in 2012. (5) Earnings per share, as adjusted (Non-GAAP) amounts exclude the impact of special (gains) and charges, discrete tax items and for 2011, post merger legacy Nalco activity. All per share, shares outstanding and market price data reflect the two-for-one stock split declared in 2003.

 

69


Exhibit (21.1)

 

SUBSIDIARIES OF ECOLAB INC.

 

Entity Name

 

State or Other
Jurisdiction of
Incorporation

 

 

 

NLC Process And Water Services SARL

 

Algeria

Ecolab (Antigua) Ltd.

 

Antigua & Barbuda

Champion Technologies de Argentina S.R.L.

 

Argentina

Ecolab, S.A.

 

Argentina

Nalco Argentina S.R.L.

 

Argentina

Ecolab (Aruba) N.V.

 

Aruba

Champion Technologies Pty. Ltd.

 

Australia

Ecolab (Fiji) Pty Limited

 

Australia

Ecolab AU2 Pty Ltd

 

Australia

Ecolab Pty Ltd.

 

Australia

Nalco Australia PTY. LTD.

 

Australia

Nalco Australia Worldwide Holdings PTY. LTD.

 

Australia

Nalco Holdings Australia PTY. LIMITED

 

Australia

Nalco Investments Australia PTY LIMITED

 

Australia

Ecolab AT 2 GmbH

 

Austria

Ecolab GmbH

 

Austria

Nalco Holdings G.m.b.H.

 

Austria

Nalco Osterreich Ges m.b.H.

 

Austria

Nalco Azerbaijan LLC

 

Azerbaijan

Ecolab Limited

 

Bahamas

Ecolab (Barbados) Limited

 

Barbados

Ecolab B.V.B.A./S.P.R.L.

 

Belgium

Ecolab Production Belgium B.V.B.A.

 

Belgium

Kay BVBA

 

Belgium

Nalco Belgium BVBA

 

Belgium

Ecolab BM 1 Limited

 

Bermuda

Adecom Quimica LTDA

 

Brazil

Champion Technologies Do Brasil Servicos E Produtos Quimicos Ltda.

 

Brazil

Ecolab Quimica Ltda.

 

Brazil

Ecolab EOOD

 

Bulgaria

Champion Technologies ULC

 

Canada

Ecolab CDN 2 Co.

 

Canada

Ecolab Co.

 

Canada

Nalco Canada Co.

 

Canada

Nalco CDN 2 Co.

 

Canada

Ledcor Nalco Services Ltd.

 

Canada

Les Produits Chimiques ERPAC Inc.

 

Canada

Ecolab Cayman 1 Limited

 

Cayman Islands

Ecolab Cayman 2 Limited

 

Cayman Islands

Ecolab S.A.

 

Chile

Nalco Industrial Services Chile Limitada

 

Chile

Ecolab (China) Investment Co., Ltd

 

China

Ecolab (GZ) Chemicals Limited

 

China

 



 

Entity Name

 

State or Other
Jurisdiction of
Incorporation

 

 

 

Ecolab (Taicang) Technology Co., Ltd.

 

China

Ecolab Chemicals Limited

 

China

Guangzhou Green Harbour Environmental Operation Ltd.

 

China

Guangzhou Green Harbour Termite Control Ltd.

 

China

Jiaxiang Medical Electronics and Technology Company

 

China

Nalco (China) Environmental Solution Co. Ltd.

 

China

Nalco (Shanghai) Trading Co. Ltd.

 

China

Nalco Industrial Services (Nanjing) Co., Ltd.

 

China

Nalco Industrial Services (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.

 

China

Ecolab Colombia S. A.

 

Colombia

Nalco De Colombia LTDA

 

Colombia

Quimiproductos Colombia, S.A.S.

 

Colombia

Ecolab, Sociedad Anonima

 

Costa Rica

Ecolab d.o.o.

 

Croatia

Nalco Cyprus Holdings Limited

 

Cyprus

Ecolab Hygiene s.r.o.

 

Czech Republic

Nalco Czechia s.r.o.

 

Czech Republic

Calgon LLC

 

Delaware

Champion U.K. Holdings, Inc.

 

Delaware

Chamtech, L.L.C.

 

Delaware

Ecolab AP Holdings LLC

 

Delaware

Ecolab Holdings (Europe) LLC

 

Delaware

Ecolab Holdings Inc.

 

Delaware

Ecolab Inc.

 

Delaware

Ecolab Investment LLC

 

Delaware

Ecolab Israel Holdings LLC

 

Delaware

Ecolab Lux Partner LLC

 

Delaware

Ecolab Manufacturing Inc.

 

Delaware

Ecolab MT Holdings LLC

 

Delaware

Ecolab MX Partner LLC

 

Delaware

Ecolab U.S. 2 Inc.

 

Delaware

Ecolab U.S. 3 LLC

 

Delaware

Ecolab U.S. 4 LLC

 

Delaware

Ecolab US 1 GP

 

Delaware

Ecolab USA Inc.

 

Delaware

Ecolabeight Inc.

 

Delaware

Ecovation, Inc.

 

Delaware

GCS Service, Inc.

 

Delaware

Krofta Technologies, LLC

 

Delaware

Microtek Medical Inc.

 

Delaware

Nalco Cal Water, LLC

 

Delaware

Nalco China Holdings LLC

 

Delaware

Nalco Company (1)

 

Delaware

Nalco Crossbow Water LLC

 

Delaware

 


(1)  This subsidiary also conducts business under the assumed name of NALCO Champion — An Ecolab Company

 



 

Entity Name

 

State or Other
Jurisdiction of
Incorporation

 

 

 

Nalco Delaware Company

 

Delaware

Nalco Energy Services Equatorial Guinea LLC

 

Delaware

Nalco Energy Services Middle East Holdings, Inc.

 

Delaware

Nalco Environmental Solutions LLC

 

Delaware

Nalco European Holding LLC

 

Delaware

Nalco Fab-Tech LLC

 

Delaware

Nalco Global Holdings LLC

 

Delaware

Nalco Holding Company

 

Delaware

Nalco Industrial Outsourcing Company

 

Delaware

Nalco International Holdings LLC

 

Delaware

Nalco Iraq Holding LLC

 

Delaware

Nalco PWS, INC.

 

Delaware

Nalco Receivables II LLC

 

Delaware

Nalco Receivables LLC

 

Delaware

Nalco Texas Leasing LLC

 

Delaware

Nalco Tiorco Middle East Holdings, LLC

 

Delaware

Nalco Two, INC.

 

Delaware

Nalco U.S. Holdings LLC

 

Delaware

Nalco US 1 LLC

 

Delaware

Nalco US I GP

 

Delaware

Nalco Worldwide Holdings LLC

 

Delaware

NALFLEET, INC.

 

Delaware

NALTECH, INC.

 

Delaware

NDC LLC

 

Delaware

NI Acquisition Holding LLC

 

Delaware

ONES West Africa LLC

 

Delaware

Process Water One

 

Delaware

Quantum Technical Services, LLC

 

Delaware

Res-Kem General Water LLC

 

Delaware

RES-KEM LLC

 

Delaware

TIORCO LLC

 

Delaware

Treated Water Outsourcing LLC

 

Delaware

Treated Water Outsourcing, a Nalco/U.S. Filter Joint Venture

 

Delaware

TWO LLC

 

Delaware

Wabasha Leasing LLC

 

Delaware

Ecolab ApS

 

Denmark

Nalco Danmark APS

 

Denmark

Microtek Dominicana S.A.

 

Dominican Republic

Champion Technologies del Ecuador CIA LTDA. CHAMPIONTECH.

 

Ecuador

Ecolab Ecuador

 

Ecuador

Nalco Egypt Trading

 

Egypt

Nalco Egypt, LTD.

 

Egypt

Ecolab, S.A. de C.V.

 

El Salvador

Champion Technologies Equatorial Guinea, S.A.R.L.

 

Equatorial Guinea

Nalco Finland Manufacturing OY

 

Finland

Nalco Finland OY

 

Finland

 



 

Entity Name

 

State or Other
Jurisdiction of
Incorporation

 

 

 

Oy Ecolab AB

 

Finland

Ecolab Pest France SAS

 

France

Ecolab Production France SAS

 

France

Ecolab SAS

 

France

Ecolab SNC

 

France

Europlak S.A.S.

 

France

Nalco France

 

France

Nalco France SNC

 

France

Shield Medicare sarl

 

France

Microtek Medical Holdings Inc.

 

Georgia

Ecolab DE 1 GmbH

 

Germany

Ecolab Deutschland GmbH

 

Germany

Ecolab Engineering GmbH

 

Germany

Ecolab Export GmbH

 

Germany

J. F. Knauer Industrie-Elektronik GmbH

 

Germany

Nalco Deutschland GMBH

 

Germany

Nalco Deutschland Manufacturing GMBH UND CO. KG

 

Germany

Nalco Grundbesitz GmbH & Co. KG

 

Germany

Nalco Manufacturing Beteiligungs GMBH

 

Germany

Nalco Real Estate GmbH

 

Germany

Nalco Energy Services (Ghana) Limited

 

Ghana

Ecolab A.E.B.E.

 

Greece

Nalco Hellas S.A.

 

Greece

Ecolab (Guam) LLC

 

Guam

Ecolab, Sociedad Anonima

 

Guatemala

Quimicas Ecolab S.A. de C.V.

 

Honduras

Ecolab Limited

 

Hong Kong

Ecolab Name Holding Limited

 

Hong Kong

Green Harbour Mainland Holdings Ltd

 

Hong Kong

Nalco Hong Kong Limited

 

Hong Kong

Ecolab Hygiene Kft.

 

Hungary

Nalco Hungary Industrial Commercial LLC

 

Hungary

Champion Dai-ichi Technologies India Ltd.

 

India

Ecolab Food Safety & Hygiene Solutions Private Limited

 

India

Nalco Water India Limited

 

India

P.T. Champion Kurnia Djaja Technologies

 

Indonesia

P.T. Nalco Indonesia

 

Indonesia

Nalco Iraq Holding Limited, Representative Office

 

Iraq

Ecolab (Holdings) Limited

 

Ireland

Ecolab Finance Company Limited

 

Ireland

Ecolab Limited

 

Ireland

Kilco Chemicals (Ireland) Limited

 

Ireland

Ecolab JVZ Limited

 

Israel

Nalco Israel Industrial Services LTD

 

Israel

Champion Technologies Italiana S.R.L.

 

Italy

Ecolab Holding Italy S.r.l.

 

Italy

 



 

Entity Name

 

State or Other
Jurisdiction of
Incorporation

 

 

 

Ecolab Production Italy Srl

 

Italy

Ecolab Srl

 

Italy

Esoform Manufacturing S.R.L.

 

Italy

Esoform S.R.L

 

Italy

Findesadue Srl

 

Italy

Nalco Italiana Holdings S.R.L.

 

Italy

Nalco Italiana Manufacturing S.R.L.

 

Italy

Nalco Italiana SrL

 

Italy

Nalco Tecnologie Diversificate SrL

 

Italy

Ecolab Limited

 

Jamaica

Ecolab G.K.

 

Japan

Katayama Nalco INC.

 

Japan

Nalco Japan G.K.

 

Japan

Nalco Gulf Limited

 

Jersey

Ecolab East Africa (Kenya) Limited

 

Kenya

Ecolab Korea Ltd.

 

Republic of Korea

Nalco Korea Limited

 

Republic of Korea

Ecolab, SIA

 

Latvia

Nalco Libya

 

Libya

Ecolab LUX & Co Holdings S.C.A.

 

Luxembourg

Ecolab LUX 1 Sarl

 

Luxembourg

Ecolab LUX 2 Sarl

 

Luxembourg

Ecolab LUX 3 Sarl

 

Luxembourg

Ecolab LUX 4 Sarl

 

Luxembourg

Ecolab LUX 5 S.a.r.l.

 

Luxembourg

Ecolab LUX 7 Sarl

 

Luxembourg

Ecolab Lux 9 S.a.r.l.

 

Luxembourg

Ecolab LUX Sarl

 

Luxembourg

Nalco Luxembourg Holdings SARL

 

Luxembourg

Ecolab-Importacao E. Exportacao Limitada

 

Macau

Chemasia Industries SDN. BHD.

 

Malaysia

CSC Kemico (South East Asia) SDN BHD.

 

Malaysia

Ecolab Sdn Bhd

 

Malaysia

Nalco Industrial Services Malaysia SDN. BHD

 

Malaysia

Ecolab MT Limited

 

Malta

Microtek Medical Malta Holding Limited

 

Malta

Microtek Medical Malta Limited

 

Malta

Champion Technologies Limited

 

Mauritius

Ecolab Holdings Mexico, S. de R. L. de C. V.

 

Mexico

Ecolab, S. de R.L. de C.V.

 

Mexico

Nalco De Mexico, S. de R. L. de C.V.

 

Mexico

Nalco Holdings, S.N.C. DE C.V.

 

Mexico

Quimiproductos, S. de R.L. de C.V.

 

Mexico

Nalco Gulf Response Corp.

 

Michigan

Ecolab Foundation

 

Minnesota

Ecolab Maroc S.A.

 

Morocco

 



 

Entity Name

 

State or Other
Jurisdiction of
Incorporation

 

 

 

Champion Technologies B.V.

 

Netherlands

Champion Technologies Europe B.V.

 

Netherlands

Champion Technologies Russia and Caspian B.V.

 

Netherlands

Chemical Innovations NL B.V.

 

Netherlands

Deryshares B.V.

 

Netherlands

Ecolab B.V.

 

Netherlands

Ecolab NL 10 B.V.

 

Netherlands

Ecolab NL 11 B.V.

 

Netherlands

Ecolab NL 13 B.V.

 

Netherlands

Ecolab NL 14 B.V.

 

Netherlands

Ecolab NL 15 BV

 

Netherlands

Ecolab NL 16 B.V.

 

Netherlands

Ecolab NL 17 C.V.

 

Netherlands

Ecolab NL 18 C.V.

 

Netherlands

Ecolab NL 3 BV

 

Netherlands

Ecolab NL 4 BV

 

Netherlands

Ecolab NL 5 BV

 

Netherlands

Ecolab NL 6 BV

 

Netherlands

Ecolab NL 8 B.V.

 

Netherlands

Ecolab NL 9 B.V.

 

Netherlands

Ecolab Production Netherlands B.V.

 

Netherlands

Ecolabone B.V.

 

Netherlands

Ecolabtwo B.V.

 

Netherlands

International Water Consultant B.V.

 

Netherlands

Microtek Medical B.V.

 

Netherlands

Microtek Medical Holding B.V.

 

Netherlands

Nalco Dutch Holdings B.V.

 

Netherlands

Nalco EMEA Holdings BV

 

Netherlands

Nalco Europe B.V.

 

Netherlands

Nalco European Finance B.V.

 

Netherlands

Nalco Global Holdings B.V.

 

Netherlands

Nalco Holding B.V.

 

Netherlands

Nalco International Holdings B.V.

 

Netherlands

Nalco Italy Holdings B.V.

 

Netherlands

Nalco Netherlands BV

 

Netherlands

Nalco Overseas Holding B.V.

 

Netherlands

Nalco Russian Holding B.V.

 

Netherlands

Nalco Universal Holdings BV

 

Netherlands

Nalco Venezuela Holding B.V.

 

Netherlands

Nalco Worldwide Holdings B. V.

 

Netherlands

OWT Oil-Water Treatment Services B.V.

 

Netherlands

Ecovation Wastewater Treatment Company, Inc.

 

New York

Ecolab New Zealand

 

New Zealand

Ecolab y Compañia Colectiva de Responsabilidad Limitada

 

Nicaragua

Champion Technologies (Nig) Limited

 

Nigeria

Nalco Energy Services Nigeria Limited

 

Nigeria

 



 

Entity Name

 

State or Other
Jurisdiction of
Incorporation

 

 

 

Kay Chemical International, Inc.

 

North Carolina

Mobotec AB, LLC

 

North Carolina

Champion Technologies AS

 

Norway

Ecolab a.s.

 

Norway

Nalco Norge AS

 

Norway

Nalco Tiorco Middle East LLC

 

Oman

Nalco Pakistan (Private) Limited

 

Pakistan

Claria Panamá, S.A.

 

Panama

Ecolab S.A.

 

Panama

Ecolab PNG Limited

 

Papua New Guinea

Nanospecialties, LLC

 

Pennsylvania

Champion Tecnologias del Peru S.R.L.

 

Peru

Ecolab Perú Holdings S.R.L.

 

Peru

Ecolab Philippines Inc.

 

Philippines

Nalco Philippines Inc.

 

Philippines

Ecolab Production Poland sp. z o.o.

 

Poland

Ecolab Services Poland Sp. z o o

 

Poland

Ecolab Sp. z o o

 

Poland

Nalco Polska Sp. z o. o.

 

Poland

Nalco Portuguesa (Quimica Industrial) Ltd.

 

Portugal

Nalco Osterreich Gesellschaft M.B.H. Belgrade, Republic of Serbia

 

Republic of Serbia

Ecolab s.r.l.

 

Romania

Champion Technologies OOO

 

Russian Federation

Chemoil Service OOO

 

Russian Federation

Master Chemicals OOO

 

Russian Federation

Nalco Company OOO

 

Russian Federation

Nalco ZAO

 

Russian Federation

Nalco-Element

 

Russian Federation

Ondeo Nalco Energy Services (Kazan)

 

Russian Federation

OOO Kogalym Chemicals Plant

 

Russian Federation

ZAO Ecolab

 

Russian Federation

Ecolab (St. Lucia) Limited

 

Saint Lucia

Champion Arabia Ltd.

 

Saudi Arabia

Nalco Saudi Co. Ltd.

 

Saudi Arabia

Aquasign

 

Scotland

Champion Technologies (Turkmenistan) Limited

 

Scotland

The Champion Partnership

 

Scotland

Ecolab Hygiene d.o.o.

 

Serbia

Aquazur PTE LTD

 

Singapore

CTI Chemicals Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd.

 

Singapore

Ecolab Pte. Ltd.

 

Singapore

Ecolab Sg 2 Pte. Ltd.

 

Singapore

Nalco Asia Holding Company PTE. LTD.

 

Singapore

Nalco Pacific Pte. LTD.

 

Singapore

Ecolab s.r.o.

 

Slovakia

Ecolab d.o.o.

 

Slovenia

 



 

Entity Name

 

State or Other
Jurisdiction of
Incorporation

 

 

 

Ecolab (Proprietary) Limited

 

South Africa

Nalco Africa (PTY.) LTD.

 

South Africa

Derypol SA

 

Spain

Ecolab Hispano-Portuguesa S.L.

 

Spain

Hicopla SL

 

Spain

Nalco Espanola Manufacturing, S.L.U.

 

Spain

Nalco Española, S.L.

 

Spain

Nalco Holding S.L.U.

 

Spain

Ecolab AB

 

Sweden

Mobotec Europe AB

 

Sweden

Nalco AB

 

Sweden

Ecolab (Schweiz) GmbH

 

Switzerland

Ecolab CH 1 GmbH

 

Switzerland

Ecolab CH 2 GmbH

 

Switzerland

Ecolab CH 3 GmbH

 

Switzerland

Ecolab Europe GmbH

 

Switzerland

Nalco Schweiz GmbH (Nalco Switzerland LLC)

 

Switzerland

Ecolab Ltd.

 

Taiwan

Nalco Taiwan Co., Ltd.

 

Taiwan

Ecolab East Africa (Tanzania) Limited

 

Tanzania

Champion Environmental Remediation, Inc.

 

Texas

Champion Vehicle Leasing LLC

 

Texas

CS-US Holdings, Inc.

 

Texas

Ecolab Food Safety Specialties Inc.

 

Texas

Fresno Energy LLC

 

Texas

Ecolab Limited

 

Thailand

Nalco Industrial Services (Thailand) Co. Ltd.

 

Thailand

Ecolab (Trinidad and Tobago )Unlimited

 

Trinidad And Tobago

Ecolab Temizleme Sistemleri Limited Sirketi

 

Turkey

Nalco Anadolu Kimya Sanayi ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi

 

Turkey

Ecolab East Africa (Uganda) Limited

 

Uganda

Ecolab LLC

 

Ukraine

Champion Technologies Middle East FZCO

 

United Arab Emirates

Ecolab Emirates General Trading LLC

 

United Arab Emirates

Ecolab Gulf FZE

 

United Arab Emirates

Calgon Europe Limited

 

United Kingdom

Champion Technologies Limited

 

United Kingdom

Ecolab (U.K.) Holdings Limited

 

United Kingdom

Ecolab Limited

 

United Kingdom

Enviroflo Engineering Limited

 

United Kingdom

Houseman Limited

 

United Kingdom

Hydrosan Limited

 

United Kingdom

LHS (UK) Limited

 

United Kingdom

Microtek Medical Europe Limited

 

United Kingdom

Midland Research Laboratories UK Limited

 

United Kingdom

Nalco Acquisition One

 

United Kingdom

 



 

Entity Name

 

State or Other
Jurisdiction of
Incorporation

 

 

 

Nalco Acquisition Two Limited

 

United Kingdom

Nalco Energy Services Limited

 

United Kingdom

Nalco Energy Services Marketing Limited

 

United Kingdom

Nalco Holdings UK LIMITED

 

United Kingdom

Nalco Investments U.K. LIMITED

 

United Kingdom

Nalco Limited

 

United Kingdom

Nalco Manufacturing Ltd.

 

United Kingdom

Nalco North Africa Limited

 

United Kingdom

Nalco Services, Ltd.

 

United Kingdom

NALFLOC LIMITED

 

United Kingdom

Shield Holdings Limited

 

United Kingdom

Shield Medicare Limited

 

United Kingdom

Shield Salvage Associates Limited (UK)

 

United Kingdom

Ecolab S.R.L.

 

Uruguay

Champion Tecnologias, C.C.A.

 

Venezuela

Ecolab S.A.

 

Venezuela

Nalco Venezuela S. C. A.

 

Venezuela

Nalco Vietnam Company Limited

 

Vietnam

Nalco Energy Services FSC, INC.

 

U.S. Virgin Islands

Nalco Foreign Sales Corporation

 

U.S. Virgin Islands

 


EXHIBIT (24.1)

 

POWER OF ATTORNEY

 

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS , That the undersigned, a director of Ecolab Inc., a Delaware corporation, does hereby make, nominate and appoint DOUGLAS M. BAKER, JR., JAMES J. SEIFERT and MICHAEL C. McCORMICK, and each of them, to be my attorney-in-fact, with full power and authority to sign his name to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ecolab Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, and all amendments thereto, provided that the Annual Report and any amendments thereto, in final form, be approved by said attorney-in-fact; and his name, when thus signed, shall have the same force and effect as though I had manually signed said document.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF , I have hereunto affixed my signature this 28 th  day of February, 2014.

 

 

/s/Barbara J. Beck

 

Barbara J. Beck

 

 

 

/s/Les S. Biller

 

Les S. Biller

 

 

 

/s/Carl M. Casale

 

Carl M. Casale

 

 

 

/s/Stephen I. Chazen

 

Stephen I. Chazen

 

 

 

/s/Jerry A. Grundhofer

 

Jerry A. Grundhofer

 

 

 

/s/Arthur J. Higgins

 

Arthur J. Higgins

 

 

 

/s/Joel W. Johnson

 

Joel W. Johnson

 

 

 

/s/Jerry W. Levin

 

Jerry W. Levin

 

 

 

/s/Robert L. Lumpkins

 

Robert L. Lumpkins

 

 

 

/s/Michael Larson

 

Michael Larson

 

 

 

/s/Victoria J. Reich

 

Victoria J. Reich

 

 

 

/s/Mary M. VanDeWeghe

 

Mary M. VanDeWeghe

 

 

 

/s/ Suzanne M. Vautrinot

 

Suzanne M. Vautrinot

 

 

 

/s/John J. Zillmer

 

John J. Zillmer

 


EXHIBIT (31.1)

 

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, Douglas M. Baker, Jr., certify that:

 

1.                                       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Ecolab Inc.;

 

2.                                       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.                                       The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)                                  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)                                  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

(c)                                   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 



 

(d)                                  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.                                       The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)                                  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)                                  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: 28 February 2014

 

 

/s/Douglas M. Baker, Jr.

 

Douglas M. Baker, Jr.

 

Chairman of the Board and

 

Chief Executive Officer

 

 



 

I, Daniel J. Schmechel, certify that:

 

1.                                       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Ecolab Inc.;

 

2.                                       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.                                       The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)                                  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)                                  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

(c)                                   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 



 

(d)                                  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.                                       The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)                                  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)                                  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: 28 February 2014

 

 

/s/Daniel J. Schmechel

 

Daniel J. Schmechel

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

 


 

 

 

EXHIBIT (32.1)

 

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, each of the undersigned officers of Ecolab Inc. does hereby certify that:

 

(a)                                  the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ecolab Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)                                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Ecolab Inc.

 

 

Dated: 28 February 2014

/s/Douglas M. Baker, Jr.

 

Douglas M. Baker, Jr.

 

Chairman of the Board and

 

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

 

/s/Daniel J. Schmechel

Dated: 28 February 2014

Daniel J. Schmechel

 

Chief Financial Officer