Final Order and Judgment Issued for TravelCenters of America LLC in Comdata Litigation

TA Recovered Attorneys’ Fees and Costs of $10.7 million.

Westlake, OH (April 13, 2018): TravelCenters of America LLC (Nasdaq: TA) today announced that, on April 9, 2018, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware entered its Final Order and Judgment (“Order”) for the Comdata litigation awarding TA attorneys’ fees and costs it incurred in the litigation. As previously announced, the Court issued an opinion on September 11, 2017 rejecting Comdata’s claims that TA had breached certain agreements that require Comdata to process customer transactions using Comdata cards at set fees through January 2, 2022.  Pursuant to the Order, Comdata is required to continue to honor the terms of these agreements and, earlier today, Comdata reimbursed TA for attorneys’ fees and costs, together with interest, in the amount of approximately $10.7 million. Comdata has thirty days from the date of the Order to file a notice of appeal in this litigation.

TA is represented in this litigation by Ropes & Gray LLP (Jane E. Willis, Matthew L. McGinnis and C. Thomas Brown) and Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP (Robert S. Saunders, Joseph O. Larkin and Jessica R. Kunz).

About TravelCenters of America LLC:

TA’s nationwide business includes travel centers located in 43 states and in Canada, standalone convenience stores in 11 states and standalone restaurants in 13 states. TA’s travel centers operate under the “TravelCenters of America”, “TA,” “Petro Stopping Centers” and “Petro” brand names and offer diesel and gasoline fueling, restaurants, truck repair services, travel/convenience stores and other services which are designed to provide attractive and efficient travel experiences to professional drivers and other motorists. TA’s convenience stores operate principally under the “Minit Mart” brand name and offer fuel as well as nonfuel products and services such as coffee, groceries, fresh food offerings and other convenience items. TA’s standalone restaurants operate principally under the “Quaker Steak & Lube” brand name.

WARNING CONCERNING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

THIS PRESS RELEASE CONTAINS STATEMENTS THAT CONSTITUTE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995 AND OTHER SECURITIES LAWS. WHENEVER TA USES WORDS SUCH AS “BELIEVE,” “EXPECT,” “ANTICIPATE,” “INTEND,” “PLAN,” “ESTIMATE,” “WILL,” “MAY” AND NEGATIVES OR DERIVATIVES OF THESE OR SIMILAR EXPRESSIONS, TA IS MAKING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS. THESE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS ARE BASED UPON TA’S PRESENT INTENT, BELIEFS OR EXPECTATIONS, BUT FORWARD L OOKING STATEMENTS ARE NOT GUARANTEED TO OCCUR AND MAY NOT OCCUR. ACTUAL RESULTS M AY DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE CONTAINED IN OR IMPLIED BY TA’S FORWARD LOOKING S TATEMENTS AS A RESULT OF VARIOUS FACTORS INCLUDING:

THIS PRESS RELEASE STATES THAT COMDATA HAS THIRTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE ORDER TO FILE A NOTICE OF APPEAL IN THIS LITIGATION. AN IMPLICATION FROM THIS STATEMENT COULD BE THAT THE FAVORABLE RESULTS TA HAS OBTAINED IN THIS LITIGATION MAY BE REVERSED OR AMENDED UPON APPEAL.

FOR ALL OF THESE REASONS, AMONG OTHERS, INVESTORS ARE CAUTIONED NOT TO PLACE U NDUE RELIANCE UPON THE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS IN THIS PRESS RELEASE. ALSO, UNLESS REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW, TA DOES NOT UNDERTAKE TO UPDATE THE STATEMENTS IN THIS PRESS RELEASE AS A RESULT OF NEW INFORMATION, FUTURE EVENTS OR OTHERWISE.

(end)

[PROPOSED] FINAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT

WHEREAS, a trial was held in this matter on April 3, 2017 and April

5-7, 2017;

WHEREAS, the Court, having considered the evidence presented at trial, the parties’ briefing, and the arguments made by counsel, issued a Memorandum Opinion (the “Memorandum Opinion”) on September 11, 2017;

WHEREAS, the Court, having considered the parties’ briefing on their respective applications for attorneys’ fees and costs, issued an Order Granting Plaintiff’s Fee Application and Denying Defendants’ Fee Application (the “Fees Opinion”) on April 2, 2018;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED this         day of                          , 2018, for the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion and the Fees Opinion that:

1.        Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff TA Operating LLC (“TA”) against Comdata, Inc. (“Comdata”) on Counts I and II of the Verified Complaint and Verified Supplement to the Complaint.

2.        Judgment is entered ordering Comdata to specifically perform its obligations under the Comdata Merchant Agreement (the “Merchant Agreement”), as amended by the Amended and Restated Amendment to Comdata Merchant Agreement (the “Amendment”), including without limitation that Comdata shall charge TA only those transaction fees set forth in the Amendment. Nothing herein shall limit or otherwise change either party’s rights under the Merchant Agreement, the Amendment, or the FIM Solution Agreement going forward, including with respect to any future breach of any agreement (except that each party reserves the right to contend that the doctrines of issue preclusion, claim preclusion, res judicata, and equitable defenses apply in any future dispute).

3.        Judgment is entered in favor of FleetCor Technologies, Inc. (“FleetCor”) on Counts I and II of the Verified Complaint and Verified Supplement to the Complaint.

4.        Count III of the Verified Complaint and Verified Supplement to the Complaint is dismissed as moot.

5.        Judgment is entered in favor of Comdata and FleetCor on Count IV of the Verified Complaint and Verified Supplement to the Complaint.

2

6.        Judgment is entered in favor of TA on Comdata’s Amended Verified Counterclaim.

7.        Comdata paid TA actual damages on November 16, 2017 in the amount of $6,903,456.00 plus (i) interest for the period before September 11, 2017 in the amount of $159,282.00 and (ii) interest for the period after September 11, 2017 in the amount of $64,720.00.

8.        As set forth in the Fees Opinion, TA as the prevailing party is entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs under Section 13(c) of the Merchant Agreement, plus pre- and post-judgment interest at the Delaware legal rate.

9.        TA has provided payment instructions for the payment of attorneys’ fees and costs and interest as ordered by the Fees Opinion and herein.

10.      Pursuant to the Fees Opinion, Comdata shall pay or cause to be paid to TA within five (5) business days of entry of this Final Order and Judgment (i) attorneys’ fees and costs incurred for the period from September 2016 through November 2017 in the amount of $9,843,618.72; (ii) pre-judgment interest in the amount of $567,534.08, representing an award of interest through April 10, 2018 (at a rate of 6.25% from the date each invoice was paid by TA); and (iii) post-judgment interest accruing at the Delaware legal rate beginning on April 14, 2018

3

and continuing as provided pursuant to 6 Del. C. § 2301(a) until satisfaction of this Final Order and Judgment.

11.      Consistent with the Fees Opinion, the parties have agreed that Comdata shall pay or cause to be paid to TA within five (5) business days of entry of this Final Order and Judgment (i) attorneys’ fees and costs incurred for the period from December 1, 2017 through April 9, 2018 in the amount of $239,000.00; and (ii) post-judgment interest accruing at the Delaware legal rate beginning on April 14, 2018 and continuing as provided pursuant to 6 Del. C. § 2301(a) until satisfaction of this Final Order and Judgment.

12.      This Final Order and Judgment may be enforced by the issuance of writs of execution substantially in the form and with the same effect as those used in the Delaware Superior Court, as provided in Court of Chancery Rule 69(a).

13.      This Final Order and Judgment may be entered by the Office of the Prothonotary of New Castle County in the same manner and form and in the same books and indexes as judgments are entered in the Superior Court, as provided in 10 Del. C. § 4734.

14.      Without affecting the finality of this Final Order and Judgment, the Court of Chancery shall retain continuing and exclusive jurisdiction to enforce

4

this Final Order and Judgment and to decide any claims or disputes that may arise or result from this Final Order and Judgment.

15.      This Final Order and Judgment is a final, appealable judgment and, the Court having determined that there is no just reason for delay, directs that it be entered forthwith by the Clerk of the Court.

5