The following table presents, in each case for the years and as of the dates indicated, our selected consolidated financial and operating data. Prior to the closing of our initial public offering (“IPO”) on August 12, 2014, Höegh LNG contributed to the Partnership all of its equity interests in each of the entities that own the PGN FSRU Lampung and the joint ventures that own the Neptune and the Cape Ann. The transfer of these equity interests by Höegh LNG to the Partnership in connection with the IPO was recorded at Höegh LNG’s consolidated book values, as adjusted to US GAAP.

Pursuant to our partnership agreement, our general partner has irrevocably delegated to our board of directors the power to oversee and direct the operations of, manage and determine the strategies and policies of the Partnership. Four of the seven board members were elected by the common unitholders at our first annual meeting of unitholders. As a result, Höegh LNG, as the owner of our general partner, does not have the power to control our board of directors or the Partnership, and we are not considered to be under the control of Höegh LNG for accounting purposes. As a consequence, we have accounted for acquisitions that are business combinations from Höegh LNG under the purchase method of accounting. Such historical acquisitions are included in our consolidated financial statements from the date of the acquisition and there has been no retroactive restatement of our financial statements to reflect the historical results of the entity acquired.

On October 1, 2015, the Partnership closed the acquisition of 100% of the shares of Höegh FSRU III, the entity that indirectly owns the Höegh Gallant (the "Höegh Gallant entities"). The results of operations of the Höegh Gallant are included in our results from the acquisition date. 

On January 3, 2017, the Partnership closed the acquisition of a 51% ownership interest in the Höegh Colombia Holding, the owner of the entities that own and operate the Höegh Grace (the "Höegh Grace entities"). The results of operations of the Höegh Grace are included in our earnings for the full year of 2017. The interest not owned by the Partnership was reflected as non-controlling interest in net income and non-controlling interest in total equity.

On December 1, 2017, the Partnership closed the acquisition of the remaining 49% ownership interest in the Höegh Grace entities.

Two of the vessels in our fleet (the Neptune and the Cape Ann) are owned by our joint ventures, each of which is owned 50% by us. Under applicable accounting guidance, we do not consolidate the financial results of these two joint ventures into our financial results. We account for our 50% equity interests in these two joint ventures as equity method investments in our consolidated financial statements. We derived cash flows from the operations of these two joint ventures from interest payments on our shareholder loans to our joint ventures.

We have two segments, which are the “Majority held FSRUs” and the “Joint venture FSRUs.” As of December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, Majority held FSRUs included the PGN FSRU Lampung, the Höegh Gallant and the Höegh Grace. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, Majority held FSRUs included the PGN FSRU Lampung and the Höegh Gallant. As of December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016 and 2015, Joint venture FSRUs included two 50%-owned FSRUs, the Neptune and the Cape Ann.

We measure our segment profit based on segment EBITDA. Segment EBITDA is reconciled to net income for each segment in the segment table below. The accounting policies applied to the segments are the same as those applied in the consolidated financial statements, except that i) Joint venture FSRUs are presented under the proportional consolidation method for the segment note in the consolidated financial statements and under equity accounting for the consolidated financial statements, ii) internal interest income and interest expense between the Partnership's subsidiaries that eliminate in consolidation are not included in the segment columns for the other financial income (expense), net line and iii) non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA is subtracted in the segment note to reflect the Partnership’s interest in Segment EBITDA as the Partnership’s segment profit measure, Segment EBITDA. Under the proportional consolidation method, 50% of the Joint venture FSRUs’ revenues, expenses and assets are reflected in the segment reporting. Management monitors the results of operations of our joint ventures under the proportional consolidation method and not the equity method. On January 1, 2017, the Partnership began consolidating its acquired 51% interest in the Höegh Grace entities. Since the Partnership obtained control of the Höegh Grace entities, it consolidates 100% of the revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities of the Höegh Grace entities and the interest not owned by the Partnership was reflected as non-controlling interest in net income and non-controlling interest in total equity. Management monitored the results of operations of the Höegh Grace entities based on the Partnership’s 51% interest in the Segment EBITDA of such entities and, therefore, subtracted the non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA to present Segment EBITDA. The adjustment to non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA is reversed to reconcile to operating income and net income in the segment presentation. On December 1, 2017, the Partnership acquired the remaining 49% ownership interest in the Höegh Grace entities and, as of that date, there is no longer a non-controlling interest in the Höegh Grace entities.

You should read the following selected financial and operating data in conjunction with “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Segment EBITDA. EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, depreciation and amortization and taxes. Segment EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, depreciation, amortization and impairment, taxes and other financial items less non-controlling interest in Segment EBITDA. Other financial items consist of gain (loss) on debt extinguishment, gain (loss) on derivative instruments and other items, net (including foreign exchange gains and losses and withholding tax on interest expenses and other). Segment EBITDA is used as a supplemental financial measure by management and external users of financial statements, such as the Partnership's lenders, to assess its financial and operating performance. The Partnership believes that Segment EBITDA assists its management and investors by increasing the comparability of its performance from period to period and against the performance of other companies in the industry that provide Segment EBITDA information. This increased comparability is achieved by excluding the potentially disparate effects between periods or companies of interest, other financial items, depreciation, amortization and impairment and taxes, which items are affected by various and possibly changing financing methods, capital structure and historical cost basis and which items may significantly affect net income between periods. The Partnership believes that including Segment EBITDA as a financial and operating measure benefits investors in (a) selecting between investing in it and other investment alternatives and (b) monitoring its ongoing financial and operational strength in assessing whether to continue to hold common or preferred units. Segment EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure and should not be considered an alternative to net income, operating income or any other measure of financial performance presented in accordance with US GAAP. Segment EBITDA excludes some, but not all, items that affect net income, and these measures may vary among other companies. Therefore, Segment EBITDA as presented below may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. The following tables reconcile Segment EBITDA for each of the segments and the Partnership as a whole to net income (loss), the comparable US GAAP financial measure, for the periods presented: 

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

Some of the following risks relate principally to the industry in which we operate and to our business in general. Other risks relate principally to the securities market and to ownership of our common units. The occurrence of any of the events described in this section could significantly and negatively affect our business, financial condition, operating results or cash available for distribution or the trading price of our preferred and common units.

Risks Inherent in Our Business

Our fleet consists of five vessels as of March 31, 2020. Any limitation on the availability or operation of those vessels could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and could significantly reduce our ability to make distributions to our unitholders.

Our fleet consists of five vessels. If any of these vessels is unable to generate revenues as a result of off-hire time, early termination of the applicable time charter, purchase of the vessel by the charterer or otherwise, our financial condition and ability to make distributions to unitholders could be materially and adversely affected.

The charters relating to our vessels permit the charterer to terminate the charter in the event that the vessel is off-hire for any extended period. The charters also allow the charterer to terminate the charter upon the occurrence of specified defaults by us or in certain other cases, including termination without cause, due to force majeure or disruptions caused by war. Furthermore, PGN LNG was granted an option to purchase the PGN FSRU Lampung at specified prices commencing in June 2018 and SPEC has the option to purchase the Höegh Grace in year 10, year 15 and year 20 of its charter. The termination of any of our charters could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and could significantly reduce our ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders. For further details regarding termination of our charters, please read “Item 4.B. Business Overview—Vessel Time Charters— Neptune Time Charter—Termination,” “— PGN FSRU Lampung Time Charter—Termination and —Purchase Option,” “—Höegh Gallant Time Charter—Termination,” “— Höegh Grace Charter—Term and Termination and —Purchase Option.” We may be unable to charter the applicable vessel, or replacement vessel, on terms as favorable to us as those of the terminated charter.

We are dependent on Total Gas & Power, PGN LNG, Höegh LNG and SPEC as the sole customers for our vessels. A deterioration of the financial viability of Total Gas & Power, PGN LNG, Höegh LNG or SPEC or our relationship with Total Gas & Power Global LNG Supply, PGN LNG, Höegh LNG or SPEC or the loss of Total Gas & Power, PGN LNG, Höegh LNG or SPEC as a customer, would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, PGN LNG, Höegh LNG’s subsidiary, EgyptCo, and SPEC accounted for all of the revenues in our consolidated income statement. For each of the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, Global LNG Supply accounted for all of the revenues of our joint ventures from which we derived all of our equity in earnings of joint ventures. Our joint ventures’ time charters were novated from Global LNG Supply to Total Gas & Power in February 2020. A deterioration in the financial viability of Total Gas & Power, PGN LNG, Höegh LNG or SPEC or the loss of Total Gas & Power, PGN LNG, Höegh LNG or SPEC as a customer, or a decline in payments under any of the related charters, would have a greater adverse effect on us than for a company with a more diverse customer base, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.

We or our joint ventures could lose a customer or the benefits of a charter as a result of a breach by the customer of a charter or other unanticipated developments, such as:

If any charter is terminated, we or our joint ventures, as applicable, may be unable to re-deploy the related vessel on terms as favorable as the current charters or at all. In addition, any termination fee payable to us may not adequately compensate us for the loss of the charter. Furthermore, if there was a premature termination of our joint venture charters that does not result in termination fees, it would result in mandatory repayments of the outstanding balances under the loan facilities for the Neptune and the Cape Ann.

In September 2017, the charterer of the Neptune and the Cape Ann made a performance claim to the joint ventures that own the vessels. This claim could reduce charter payments to such joint ventures. As a precaution, such joint ventures have suspended payments under the shareholder loans. Our ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders depends on the performance of our joint ventures, subsidiaries and other investments. If we do not receive cash distributions or repayments under loan agreements from our joint ventures or if they are not sufficient, we will not be able to make cash distributions to unitholders unless we obtain funds from other sources. We may not be able to obtain the necessary funds from other sources on terms acceptable to us. Please read “Settlement of the boil-off performance claims is expected to reduce our joint ventures' ability to distribute cash to us.”

Any event, whether in our industry or otherwise, that adversely affects a customer’s financial condition, leverage, results of operations, cash flows or demand for our services may adversely affect our ability to sustain or increase cash distributions to our unitholders. Accordingly, we are indirectly subject to the business risks of our customers, including their level of indebtedness and the economic conditions and government policies in their areas of operation. Further, not all of our charters have parent company guarantees. For example, Total Gas & Power’s obligations under the Neptune and the Cape Ann charters are not guaranteed by its parent, Total.

The ability of each of our customers to perform its obligations under its applicable charter depends on its future financial condition and economic performance, which, in turn, will depend on prevailing economic conditions and financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond its control.

Höegh LNG has financial obligations to us pursuant to the Subsequent Charter and its guarantee and indemnification obligations, including those related to the boil-off claim. The inability of Höegh LNG to meet its financial obligations to us would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders.

Pursuant to an option agreement, we had the right to cause Höegh LNG to charter the Höegh Gallant from the expiration or termination of the EgyptCo charter until July 2025, at a rate equal to 90% of the rate payable pursuant to the current charter, plus any incremental taxes or operating expenses as a result of the new charter. On February 27, 2020, we exercised our option pursuant to the option agreement and we intend to enter into a Subsequent Charter with Höegh LNG for the Höegh Gallant, the final terms of which are subject to approval by the Partnership’s conflicts committee and board of directors.

In February 2020, each of the joint ventures and the charterer reached a commercial settlement addressing all the past and future claims related to boil-off with respect to the Neptune and the Cape Ann. The settlement amount is in line with the accrual made by the joint ventures. Accordingly, the accrual was unchanged as of December 31, 2019. The settlement reached is subject to executing final binding agreements between the parties and the necessary board of directors’ and lenders’ approvals. The final settlement and release agreements were signed on and had an effective date of April 1, 2020. Among other things, the settlement provides that 1) the boil-off claim, up to the signature date of the settlement agreements, will be settled for an aggregate amount of $23.7 million, paid in instalments during 2020, 2) the costs of arbitration will be equally split between the parties and each party will settle its legal and other costs, 3) the joint ventures have or will implement technical upgrades on the vessels at their own cost to minimize boil-off, and 4) the relevant provisions of the time charters will be amended regarding the computation and settlement of prospective boil-off claims. We will be indemnified by Höegh LNG for our 50% share of the cash impact of the settlement, the arbitration costs and any legal expenses, the technical modifications of the vessels and any prospective boil-off claims or other direct impacts of the settlement agreement.

Höegh LNG’s ability to make payments to us under the Subsequent Charter and for the indemnification related to the boil-off claim may be affected by events beyond either of the control of Höegh LNG or us, including opportunities to obtain new employment for the vessel, and prevailing economic, financial and industry conditions. If market or other economic conditions deteriorate, Höegh LNG’s ability to meet its obligations to us may be impaired. If Höegh LNG is unable to meet its obligations to us under the Subsequent Charter, our financial condition, results of operations and ability to make cash distributions to unitholders could be materially adversely affected. 

Our growth depends on our ability to expand relationships with existing customers and obtain new customers, for which we will face substantial competition.

One of our principal objectives is to enter into additional long-term charters for FSRUs, LNG carriers and other LNG infrastructure assets. The process of obtaining long-term charters for FSRUs, LNG carriers and other LNG infrastructure assets is competitive and generally involves an intensive screening process and competitive bids, and then often extends for several months. We believe FSRU and LNG carriers time charters are awarded based upon a variety of factors relating to the vessel operator, including: