AN OFFERING STATEMENT PURSUANT TO REGULATION A RELATING TO THESE SECURITIES HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS PRELIMINARY OFFERING CIRCULAR IS SUBJECT TO COMPLETION OR AMENDMENT. THESE SECURITIES MAY NOT BE SOLD NOR MAY OFFERS TO BUY BE ACCEPTED BEFORE THE OFFERING STATEMENT FILED WITH THE COMMISSION IS QUALIFIED. THIS PRELIMINARY OFFERING CIRCULAR SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR THE SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY NOR MAY THERE BE ANY SALES OF THESE SECURITIES IN ANY STATE IN WHICH SUCH OFFER, SOLICITATION OR SALE WOULD BE UNLAWFUL BEFORE REGISTRATION OR QUALIFICATION UNDER THE LAWS OF SUCH STATE. THE COMPANY MAY ELECT TO SATISFY ITS OBLIGATION TO DELIVER A FINAL OFFERING CIRCULAR BY SENDING YOU A NOTICE WITHIN TWO BUSINESS DAYS AFTER THE COMPLETION OF THE COMPANY’S SALE TO YOU THAT CONTAINS THE URL WHERE THE FINAL OFFERING CIRCULAR OR THE OFFERING STATEMENT IN WHICH SUCH FINAL OFFERING CIRCULAR WAS FILED MAY BE OBTAINED.

PRELIMINARY OFFERING CIRCULAR DATED APRIL 3, 2020

T Stamp Inc. (D/B/A Trust Stamp)

75 5th St NW, Suite 2290

Atlanta, Georgia, 30308 USA
 

www.truststamp.ai

*The Series A Preferred Stock is convertible into Common Stock either at the discretion of the investor or automatically upon the occurrence of certain events, like effectiveness of registration of the Common Stock in an initial public offering. The total number of shares of the Common Stock into which the Series A Preferred Stock may be converted will be determined by dividing the original issue price per share by the conversion price per share. See “Securities Being Offered” at page 29 for additional details.

*The Company has engaged SI Securities, LLC to serve as its sole and exclusive placement agent to assist in the placement of its securities. The Company will pay SI Securities, LLC in accordance with the terms of the Issuer Agreement between the Company and SI Securities, LLC, a copy of which is filed as an exhibit to the Offering Statement of which this Offering Circular is a part. If the placement agent identifies all the investors and the maximum amount of shares is sold, the maximum amount the Company would pay SI Securities, LLC is $490,000. This does not include transaction fees paid directly to SI Securities, LLC by investors. See “Plan of Distribution and Selling Securityholders” for details of compensation and transaction fees to be paid to the placement agent on page 13.

The Company expects that the amount of expenses of the offering that it will pay will be approximately $162,906, not including commissions or state filing fees.

The Company is selling shares of Series A Preferred Stock.

The Company has engaged The Bryn Mawr Trust Company of Delaware as an escrow agent (the “Escrow Agent”) to hold funds tendered by investors, and assuming we sell a minimum of $800,000 worth of shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, may hold a series of closings at which we receive the funds from the Escrow Agent and issue the shares to investors. The offering will terminate at the earlier of: (1) the date at which the maximum offering amount has been sold, (2) one year from the date upon which the Securities and Exchange Commission qualifies the Offering Statement of which this Offering Circular forms a part, or (3) the date at which the offering is earlier terminated by the Company in its sole discretion. In the event we have not sold the minimum amount of shares within one year from the date of qualification of this offering, or sooner terminated by the Company, any money tendered by potential investors will be promptly returned by the Escrow Agent. The Company may undertake one or more closings on a rolling basis once the minimum offering amount is sold. After each closing, funds tendered by investors will be available to the Company. The offering is being conducted on a best-efforts basis.

INVESTING IN THE SERIES A PREFERRED STOCK OF TRUST STAMP IS SPECULATIVE AND INVOLVES SUBSTANTIAL RISKS. YOU SHOULD PURCHASE THESE SECURITIES ONLY IF YOU CAN AFFORD A COMPLETE LOSS OF YOUR INVESTMENT. SEE “RISK FACTORS” BEGINNING ON PAGE 6 TO READ ABOUT THE MORE SIGNIFICANT RISKS YOU SHOULD CONSIDER BEFORE BUYING THE SERIES A PREFERRED STOCK OF THE COMPANY.

THE UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION DOES NOT PASS UPON THE MERITS OR GIVE ITS APPROVAL OF ANY SECURITIES OFFERED OR THE TERMS OF THE OFFERING, NOR DOES IT PASS UPON THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF ANY OFFERING CIRCULAR OR OTHER SOLICITATION MATERIALS. THESE SECURITIES ARE OFFERED PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION FROM REGISTRATION WITH THE COMMISSION; HOWEVER, THE COMMISSION HAS NOT MADE AN INDEPENDENT DETERMINATION THAT THE SECURITIES OFFERED ARE EXEMPT FROM REGISTRATION

GENERALLY, NO SALE MAY BE MADE TO YOU IN THIS OFFERING IF THE AGGREGATE PURCHASE PRICE YOU PAY IS MORE THAN 10% OF THE GREATER OF YOUR ANNUAL INCOME OR NET WORTH. DIFFERENT RULES APPLY TO ACCREDITED INVESTORS AND NON-NATURAL PERSONS. BEFORE MAKING ANY REPRESENTATION THAT YOUR INVESTMENT DOES NOT EXCEED APPLICABLE THRESHOLDS, WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO REVIEW RULE 251(d)(2)(i)(C) OF REGULATION A. FOR GENERAL INFORMATION ON INVESTING, WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO REFER TO www.investor.gov.

Sales of these securities will commence on approximately April [   ], 2020.

The Company is following the “Offering Circular” format of disclosure under Regulation A.

In the event that we become a reporting Company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we intend to take advantage of the provisions that relate to “Emerging Growth Companies” under the JOBS Act of 2012. See “Implications of Being an Emerging Growth Company”.

In this Offering Circular, the term “Trust Stamp”, “we”, “us”, “our” or “the Company” refers to T Stamp Inc. d/b/a Trust Stamp.

THIS OFFERING CIRCULAR MAY CONTAIN FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND INFORMATION RELATING TO, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THE COMPANY, ITS BUSINESS PLAN AND STRATEGY, AND ITS INDUSTRY. THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ARE BASED ON THE BELIEFS OF, ASSUMPTIONS MADE BY, AND INFORMATION CURRENTLY AVAILABLE TO THE COMPANY’S MANAGEMENT. WHEN USED IN THE OFFERING MATERIALS, THE WORDS “ESTIMATE”, “PROJECT”, “BELIEVE”, “ANTICIPATE”, “INTEND”, “EXPECT” AND SIMILAR EXPRESSIONS ARE INTENDED TO IDENTIFY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS, WHICH CONSTITUTE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS. THESE STATEMENTS REFLECT MANAGEMENT’S CURRENT VIEWS WITH RESPECT TO FUTURE EVENTS AND ARE SUBJECT TO RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES THAT COULD CAUSE THE COMPANY’S ACTUAL RESULTS TO DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE CONTAINED IN THE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. INVESTORS ARE CAUTIONED NOT TO PLACE UNDUE RELIANCE ON THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS, WHICH SPEAK ONLY AS OF THE DATE ON WHICH THEY ARE MADE. THE COMPANY DOES NOT UNDERTAKE ANY OBLIGATION TO REVISE OR UPDATE THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS TO REFLECT EVENTS OR CIRCUMSTANCES AFTER SUCH DATE OR TO REFLECT THE OCCURRENCE OF UNANTICIPATED EVENTS.

SUMMARY

Overview

Trust Stamp develops proprietary artificial intelligence powered solutions; researching and leveraging biometric science, cryptography, and data mining to deliver insightful identity & trust predictions while identifying and defending against fraudulent identity attacks. We utilize the cutting-edge power and agility of technologies such as GPU processing and neural networks to process data faster and more effectively than has ever previously been possible, as well as deliver results at a disruptively low cost for usage across multiple industries, including:

Implications of Being an Emerging Growth Company

As an issuer with less than $1 billion in total annual gross revenues during our last fiscal year, we will qualify as an “emerging growth company” under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”) and this status will be significant if and when we become subject to the ongoing reporting requirements of the Exchange Act upon filing a Form 8-A. An emerging growth company may take advantage of certain reduced reporting requirements and is relieved of certain other significant requirements that are otherwise generally applicable to public companies. In particular, as an emerging growth company we:

We intend to take advantage of all of these reduced reporting requirements and exemptions, including the longer phase-in periods for the adoption of new or revised financial accounting standards, and hereby elect to do so. Our election to use the phase-in periods may make it difficult to compare our financial statements to those of non-emerging growth companies and other emerging growth companies that have opted out of the phase-in periods under Section 107 of the JOBS Act.

Under the JOBS Act, we may take advantage of the above-described reduced reporting requirements and exemptions for up to five years after our initial sale of common equity pursuant to a registration statement declared effective under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or such earlier time that we no longer meet the definition of an emerging growth company. Note that this offering, while a public offering, is not a sale of common equity pursuant to a registration statement, since the offering is conducted pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements. In this regard, the JOBS Act provides that we would cease to be an “emerging growth company” if we have more than $1 billion in annual revenues, have more than $700 million in market value of our Common Stock held by non-affiliates, or issue more than $1 billion in principal amount of non-convertible debt over a three-year period.

Certain of these reduced reporting requirements and exemptions are also available to us due to the fact that we may also qualify, once listed, as a “smaller reporting company” under the Commission’s rules. For instance, smaller reporting companies are not required to obtain an auditor attestation on their assessment of internal control over financial reporting; are not required to provide a compensation discussion and analysis; are not required to provide a pay-for-performance graph or CEO pay ratio disclosure; and may present only two years of audited financial statements and related MD&A disclosure.

Selected Risks Associated with Our Business

Our business is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including those highlighted in the section titled “Risk Factors” immediately following this summary. These risks include, but are not limited to, the following:

RISK FACTORS

The SEC requires the Company to identify risks that are specific to its business and its financial condition. The Company is still subject to all the same risks that all companies in its business, and all companies in the economy, are exposed to. These include risks relating to economic downturns, political and economic events, and technological developments (such as cyber-attacks and the ability to prevent such attacks). Additionally, early-stage companies are inherently riskier than more developed companies, and the risk of business failure and complete loss of your investment capital is present. You should consider general risks as well as specific risks when deciding whether to invest.

Risks Related to Our Company

We have a limited operating history upon which you can evaluate our performance and have not yet generated profits. Accordingly, our prospects must be considered in light of the risks that any new company encounters. Our company was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on April 11, 2016, and we have not yet generated profits. The likelihood of our creation of a viable business must be considered in light of the problems, expenses, difficulties, complications, and delays frequently encountered in connection with the growth of a business, operation in a competitive industry, and the continued development of our technology and products. We anticipate that our operating expenses will increase for the near future, and there is no assurance that we will be profitable in the near future. You should consider our business, operations, and prospects in light of the risks, expenses and challenges faced as an emerging growth company.

We have historically operated at a loss, which has resulted in an accumulated deficit. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, we incurred a net loss of $2,143,506. There can be no assurance that we will ever achieve profitability. Even if we do, there can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. Failure to do so would continue to have a material adverse effect on our accumulated deficit, would affect our cash flows, would affect our efforts to raise capital and is likely to result in a decline in our Common Stock price.

The auditor included a “going concern” note in its audit report. We may not have enough funds to sustain the business until it becomes profitable. Even if we raise funds through this offering, we may not accurately anticipate how quickly we may use the funds and whether these funds are sufficient to bring the business to profitability.

Our technology continues to be developed, and it is unlikely that we will ever develop our technology to a point at which no further development is required. Trust Stamp is developing complex technology that requires significant technical and regulatory expertise to develop, commercialize and update to meet evolving market and regulatory requirements. If we are unable to successfully develop and commercialize our technology and products, it will significantly affect our viability as a company. 

If our security measures are breached or unauthorized access to individually identifiable biometric or other personally identifiable information is otherwise obtained, our reputation may be harmed, and we may incur significant liabilities. In the ordinary course of our business, we may collect and store sensitive data, including protected health information (“PHI”), personally identifiable information (“PII”), owned or controlled by ourselves or our customers, and other parties. We communicate sensitive data, including patient data, electronically, and through relationships with multiple third-party vendors and their subcontractors. These applications and data encompass a wide variety of business-critical information, including research and development information, patient data, commercial information, and business and financial information. We face a number of risks relative to protecting this critical information, including loss of access risk, inappropriate use or disclosure, inappropriate modification, and the risk of our being unable to adequately monitor, audit, and modify our controls over our critical information. This risk extends to the third-party vendors and subcontractors we use to manage this sensitive data. As a custodian of this data, Trust Stamp therefore inherits responsibilities related to this data, exposing itself to potential threats. Data breaches occur at all levels of corporate sophistication (including at companies with significantly greater resources and security measures than our own) and the resulting fallout stemming from these breaches can be costly, time-consuming, and damaging to a company’s reputation. Further, data breaches need not occur from malicious attack or phishing only. Often, employee carelessness can result in sharing PII with a much wider audience than intended. Consequences of such data breaches could result in fines, litigation expenses, costs of implementing better systems, and the damage of negative publicity, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business operations and financial condition.

We are subject to substantial governmental regulation relating to our technology and will continue to be for the lifetime of our Company. By virtue of handling sensitive PII and biometric data, we are subject to numerous statutes related to data privacy and additional legislation and regulation should be anticipated in every jurisdiction in which we operate. Examples of federal (US) and European statutes we could be subject to are:

Any such access, breach, or other loss of information could result in legal claims or proceedings, liability under federal or state laws that protect the privacy of personal information under HIPAA and/or “HITECH”. Notice of breaches must be made to affected individuals, the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”), and for extensive breaches, notice may need to be made to the media or state attorneys general. Penalties for violations of these laws vary. For instance, penalties for failure to comply with a requirement of HIPAA and HITECH vary significantly, and include significant civil monetary penalties and, in certain circumstances, criminal penalties with fines up to $250,000 per violation and/or imprisonment. A person who knowingly obtains or discloses individually identifiable health information in violation of HIPAA may face a criminal penalty of up to $50,000 and up to one-year imprisonment. The criminal penalties increase if the wrongful conduct involves false pretenses or the intent to sell, transfer or use identifiable health information for commercial advantage, personal gain, or malicious harm.

Further, various states, such as California, have implemented similar privacy laws and regulations, such as the California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act, that impose restrictive requirements regulating the use and disclosure of health information and other personally identifiable information. Where state laws are more protective, we have to comply with the stricter provisions. In addition to fines and penalties imposed upon violators, some of these state laws also afford private rights of action to individuals who believe their personal information has been misused. California’s patient privacy laws, for example, provide for penalties of up to $250,000 and permit injured parties to sue for damages. The interplay of federal and state laws may be subject to varying interpretations by courts and government agencies, creating complex compliance issues for us and data we receive, use and share, potentially exposing us to additional expense, adverse publicity, and liability. Further, as regulatory focus on privacy issues continues to increase and laws and regulations concerning the protection of personal information expand and become more complex, these potential risks to our business could intensify. Changes in laws or regulations associated with the enhanced protection of certain types of sensitive data, such as PII or PHI, along with increased customer demands for enhanced data security infrastructure, could greatly increase our cost of providing our services, decrease demand for our services, reduce our revenues and/or subject us to additional liabilities.

Compliance with U.S. and international data protection laws and regulations could cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business practices and compliance procedures in a manner adverse to our business. Moreover, complying with these various laws could require us to take on more onerous obligations in our contracts, restrict our ability to collect, use and disclose data, or in some cases, impact our ability to operate in certain jurisdictions. We rely on our customers to obtain valid and appropriate consents from data subjects whose biometric samples and data we process on such customers’ behalf. Given that we do not obtain direct consent from such data subjects and we do not audit our customers to ensure that they have obtained the necessary consents required by law, the failure of our customers to obtain consents that are in compliance with applicable law could result in our own non-compliance with privacy laws. Such failure to comply with U.S. and international data protection laws and regulations could result in government enforcement actions (which could include civil or criminal penalties), private litigation and/or adverse publicity and could negatively affect our operating results and business. Claims that we have violated individuals’ privacy rights, failed to comply with data protection laws, or breached our contractual obligations, even if we are not found liable, could be expensive and time consuming to defend, could result in adverse publicity and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We anticipate sustaining operating losses for the foreseeable future. It is anticipated that we will sustain operating losses in 2020 and 2021 as we expand our team, continue with research and development, and strive to gain customers for our technology and gain market share in our industry. Our ability to become profitable depends on our ability to expand our customer base, consisting of companies willing to license our technology. There can be no assurance that this will occur. Unanticipated problems and expenses are often encountered in offering new products which may impact whether the Company is successful. Furthermore, we may encounter substantial delays and unexpected expenses related to development, technological changes, marketing, regulatory requirements and changes to such requirements or other unforeseen difficulties. There can be no assurance that we will ever become profitable. If the Company sustains losses over an extended period of time, it may be unable to continue in business.

If our products do not achieve broad acceptance both domestically and internationally, we will not be able to achieve our anticipated level of growth. Our revenues are derived from licensing our identity authentication solutions. We cannot accurately predict the future growth rate or the size of the market for our technology. The expansion of the market for our solutions depends on a number of factors, such as

Even if our technology gains wide market acceptance, our solutions may not adequately address market requirements and may not continue to gain market acceptance. If authentication solutions generally or our solutions specifically do not gain wide market acceptance, we may not be able to achieve our anticipated level of growth and our revenues and results of operations would suffer.

We operate in a highly competitive industry that is dominated by multiple very large, well-capitalized market leaders and is constantly evolving. New entrants to the market, existing competitor actions, or other changes in market dynamics could adversely impact us. The level of competition in the identity authentication industry is high, with multiple exceptionally large, well-capitalized competitors holding a majority share of the market. Currently, we are not aware of any direct competitors of the Company able to offer our main technological offering which is non-PII tokenized identity authentication using a hash that is derived from biometric or other identifying data and capable of being probabilistically matched and deduplicated on both a 1:1 and 1:n basis. Nonetheless, many of the companies in the identity authentication market have longer operating histories, larger customer bases, significantly greater financial, technological, sales, marketing, and other resources than we do. At any point, these companies may decide to devote their resources to creating a competing technology solution which will impact our ability to maintain or gain market share in this industry. Further, such companies will be able to respond more quickly than we can to new or changing opportunities, technologies, standards, or client requirements, more quickly develop new products or devote greater resources to the promotion and sale of their products and services than we can. Likewise, their greater capabilities in these areas may enable them to better withstand periodic downturns in the identity management solutions industry and compete more effectively on the basis of price and production. In addition, new companies may enter the markets in which we compete, further increasing competition in the identity management solutions industry.

We believe that our ability to compete successfully depends on a number of factors, including the type and quality of our products and the strength of our brand names, as well as many factors beyond our control. We may not be able to compete successfully against current or future competitors, and increased competition may result in price reductions, reduced profit margins, loss of market share and an inability to generate cash flows that are sufficient to maintain or expand the development and marketing of new products, any of which would adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.

We face competition from companies with greater financial, technical, sales, marketing, and other resources, and, if we are unable to compete effectively with these competitors, our market share may decline, and our business could be harmed. We face competition from well established companies. Many of our competitors have longer operating histories, larger customer bases, significantly greater financial, technological, sales, marketing, and other resources than we do. As a result, our competitors may be able to respond more quickly than we can to new or changing opportunities, technologies, standards, or client requirements, more quickly develop new products or devote greater resources to the promotion and sale of their products and services than we can. Likewise, their greater capabilities in these areas may enable them to better withstand periodic downturns in the identity management solutions industry and compete more effectively on the basis of price and production. In addition, new companies may enter the markets in which we compete, further increasing competition in the identity management solutions industry.

We believe that our ability to compete successfully depends on a number of factors, including the type and quality of our products and the strength of our brand names, as well as many factors beyond our control. We may not be able to compete successfully against current or future competitors, and increased competition may result in price reductions, reduced profit margins, loss of market share and an inability to generate cash flows that are sufficient to maintain or expand the development and marketing of new products, any of which would adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.

The Company does not currently hold any issued patents on its products or technology. As of the date of this Offering, the Company has not been issued any patents. While the Company has filed patent applications and believes that it could secure patent protection for elements of its technology, the Company has made a considered and strategic decision not to aggressively pursue the issuance of patents in respect of its technology, as it believes that the disclosure required to obtain such protection could expose some of the inner-workings of its technology to competitors, who may in turn attempt to mimic the technology and/or to bad-actors who could seek to circumvent the technology. The Company currently has a total of 8 patent applications pending which may serve to discourage other inventors from stealing or copying our technology and/or assist in defending against any third-party infringement claims. At any given time, the Company may also have one or more Provisional Patents filed pending filing of a Utility Patent application. Nonetheless, by not having patents issued for our technology, we are exposed to the risk that our technology could be copied, which would seriously harm our core business model. There is no guarantee that the Company will ever be issued patents on the applications it has submitted. In addition, in order to control costs, we have filed patent applications only in the United States. This may result in our having limited or no protection in other jurisdictions. Our success depends to a significant degree upon the protection of our products and technology. If we are unable to secure patents for our products and technology, or are otherwise are unsuccessful at protecting our technology, other companies with greater resources may copy our technology and/or products, or improve upon them, putting us at a disadvantage to our competitors.

Successful infringement claims against us could result in significant monetary liability or prevent us from selling some of our products. We believe our products and technology may be highly disruptive to a very large and growing market. Our competitors are well capitalized with significant intellectual property protection and resources and they (and/or patent trolls) may initiate infringement lawsuits against our Company. Such litigation could be expensive and could also prevent us from selling our products, which would significantly harm our ability to grow our business as planned.

Our failure to attract and retain highly qualified personnel in the future could harm our business. As the Company grows, it will be required to hire and attract additional qualified professionals such as a Deputy Science Officer (for cryptography and certifications), additional staff for research and development, regulatory professionals, sales and marketing professionals, accounting, legal, and finance experts. The Company may not be able to locate or attract qualified individuals for such positions, which will affect the Company’s ability to grow and expand its business.

We rely on third party service providers. Our third-party partners provide a variety of essential business functions, including distribution, manufacturing, and many others. It is possible that some of these third parties will fail to perform their services or will perform them in an unacceptable manner. If we encounter problems with one or more of these parties and they fail to perform to expectations, it could have a material adverse impact on the Company.

We currently have two customers that account for substantially all of our revenues. During the Company’s development, we have focused on developing relationships with a few partners and customers. As such, our historical financial results identify that we generated substantially all of our revenue from two customers. As we grow, we intend to expand the number of customers from which we generate revenues. In the opinion of our management, we would be able to continue operations without our current customers. However, the unanticipated loss of the Company’s current customers could have an adverse effect on the company’s financial position.

Our future success is dependent on the continued service of our small management team. Three directors and four executive officers provide leadership to Trust Stamp. Two of the directors are also executive officers. Our success is dependent on their ability to manage all aspects of our business effectively. Because we are relying on our small management team, we lack certain business development resources that may hurt our ability to grow our business. Although we are currently growing our management team, there is no guarantee that newly added management team members will contribute to Trust Stamp as we hope. Any loss of key members of our executive team could have a negative impact on our ability to manage and grow our business effectively. We do not maintain a key person life insurance policy on any of the members of our senior management team. As a result, we would have no way to cover the financial loss if we were to lose the services of our directors or officers. 

We expect to raise additional capital through equity and/or debt offerings to support our working capital requirements and operating losses. In order to fund future growth and development, the Company will likely need to raise additional funds in the future by offering shares of its Common or Preferred Stock and/or other classes of equity, or debt that convert into shares of common or Preferred Stock, any of which offerings would dilute the ownership percentage of investors in this offering. See “Dilution”. In order to issue sufficient shares in this regard, we may be required to amend our certificate of incorporation to increase our authorized capital stock, which would be require us to obtain a consent of a majority of our shareholders. Furthermore, if the Company raises capital through debt, the holders of our debt would have priority over holders of common and Preferred Stock and the Company may be required to accept terms that restrict its ability to incur more debt. We cannot assure you that the necessary funds will be available on a timely basis, on favorable terms, or at all, or that such funds if raised, would be sufficient. The level and timing of future expenditure will depend on a number of factors, many of which are outside our control. If we are not able to obtain additional capital on acceptable terms, or at all, we may be forced to curtail or abandon our growth plans, which could adversely impact the Company, its business, development, financial condition, operating results, or prospects.

Any valuation at this stage is difficult to assess. The valuation for this offering was established by the Company. Unlike listed companies that are valued publicly through market-driven stock prices, the valuation of private companies, especially early-stage companies, is difficult to assess and you may risk overpaying for your investment.

If we cannot raise sufficient funds, we will not succeed. We are offering shares of our Series A Preferred Stock in the amount of up to $5,600,000 in this offering on a best-efforts basis and may not raise the complete amount. Even if the maximum amount is raised, we are likely to need additional funds in the future in order to grow, and if we cannot raise those funds for whatever reason, including reasons relating to the Company itself or to the broader economy, the Company may not survive. If we raise a substantially lesser amount than the maximum offering amount, we will have to find other sources of funding for some of the plans outlined in “Use of Proceeds To Issuer”.

Risks Related to the Securities in this Offering

In certain circumstances investors will not have dissenters’ rights. The investors’ rights agreement that investors will execute in connection with the offering contains a “drag-along” provision whereby investors agree to vote any shares they own in the same manner as the majority holders of our other classes of stock. Specifically, and without limitation, if the majority holders of our other classes of stock determine to sell the Company, depending on the nature of the transaction, investors will be forced to sell their stock in that transaction regardless of whether they believe the transaction is the best or highest value for their shares, and regardless of whether they believe the transaction is in their best interests.

Investors in this offering may not be entitled to a jury trial with respect to claims arising under the subscription agreement, the investors’ rights agreement, which could result in less favorable outcomes to the plaintiff(s) in any action under these agreements. Investors in this offering will be bound by the subscription agreement and investors’ rights agreement both of which include a provision under which investors waive the right to a jury trial of any claim they may have against the Company arising out of or relating to these agreements. By signing these agreements, the investor warrants that the investor has reviewed this waiver with his or her legal counsel, and knowingly and voluntarily waives the investor’s jury trial rights following consultation with the investor’s legal counsel.

If we opposed a jury trial demand based on the waiver, a court would determine whether the waiver was enforceable based on the facts and circumstances of that case in accordance with the applicable state and federal law. To our knowledge, the enforceability of a contractual pre-dispute jury trial waiver in connection with claims arising under the federal securities laws has not been finally adjudicated by a federal court. However, we believe that a contractual pre-dispute jury trial waiver provision is generally enforceable, including under the laws of the State of New York which governs the subscription agreement and investors’ rights agreement, and in the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware. In determining whether to enforce a contractual pre-dispute jury trial waiver provision, courts will generally consider whether the visibility of the jury trial waiver provision within the agreement is sufficiently prominent such that a party knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived the right to a jury trial. We believe that this is the case with respect to the subscription agreement and investors’ rights agreement. You should consult legal counsel regarding the jury waiver provision before entering into the subscription agreement and investors’ rights agreement. 

If you bring a claim against the Company in connection with matters arising under either the investors’ rights agreement or the subscription agreement, including claims under federal securities laws, you may not be entitled to a jury trial with respect to those claims, which may have the effect of limiting and discouraging lawsuits against the Company. If a lawsuit is brought against the Company under the either of these agreements, it may be heard only by a judge or justice of the applicable trial court, which would be conducted according to different civil procedures and may result in different outcomes than a trial by jury would have had, including results that could be less favorable to the plaintiff(s) in such an action. 

Nevertheless, if this jury trial waiver provision is not permitted by applicable law, an action could proceed under the terms of the subscription agreement or investors’ rights agreement with a jury trial. No condition, stipulation or provision of the subscription agreement or investors’ rights agreement serves as a waiver by any holder of common shares or by us of compliance with any substantive provision of the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations promulgated under those laws.

In addition, when the shares are transferred, the transferee is required to agree to all the same conditions, obligations and restrictions applicable to the shares or to the transferor with regard to ownership of the shares, that were in effect immediately prior to the transfer of the Shares, including but not limited to the investors’ rights agreement or subscription agreement.  

This investment is illiquid. There is no currently established market for reselling these securities. If you decide that you want to resell these securities in the future, you may not be able to find a buyer. Although the Company intends to apply in the future for quotation of its Common Stock on a national exchange, over-the-counter market, or similar, exchange, there are a number of requirements that the Company may or may not be able to satisfy in a timely manner. Even if we obtain that quotation, we do not know the extent to which investor interest will lead to the development and maintenance of a liquid trading market. You should assume that you may not be able to liquidate your investment for some time or be able to pledge these shares as collateral.

You will need to keep records of your investment for tax purposes. As with all investments in securities, if you sell our Series A Preferred Stock at a profit or loss, you will probably need to pay tax on the long- or short-term capital gains that you realize, or apply the loss to other taxable income. If you do not have a regular brokerage account, or your regular broker will not hold our Series A Preferred Stock for you (and many brokers refuse to hold securities issued under Regulation A) there will be nobody keeping records for you for tax purposes and you will have to keep your own records, and calculate the gain or loss on any sales of the Series A Preferred Stock. 

The value of your investment will be diluted if the Company issues stock or options to employees, contractors, advisors, or board members. The Company may (with the approval of the Board of Directors) issue stock or options to employees, contractors, advisors, or board members as an element of their compensation package. Any such issuance will dilute your investment.

Investors in this offering will receive our Series A Preferred Stock, which has limited voting rights compared to our Common Stock. Investors in this offering that purchase our Series A Preferred Stock will have limited voting rights compared to those of the holders of our Common Stock. Our Certificate of Incorporation states that the holders of our Common Stock are entitled to elect four (4) directors of the corporation to our Board of Directors alone as a class, so long as 25% of the Company’s authorized Preferred Stock remains outstanding. Our Preferred Stockholders therefore will have no choice as to the election of four members of the Board of Directors of the Company. The Preferred Stockholders also do not have the right to vote for any directors of the corporation as a standalone class, which is a right granted to our Common Stockholders. The holders of our Preferred Stock are entitled to vote together with the holders of the Common Stock for the election of one (1) independent director, and may vote together with the holders of the Common Stock on any additional directors to be elected to our Board of Directors after the initial five (5) directors are elected. Therefore, investors in this offering will very likely not be able to exert the same amount of control over the management of the Company as the holders of the Common Stock. See “Securities Being Offered” for more information on the voting rights of our Series A Preferred Stock.

We intend for a significant portion of this offering to go towards redemption of an outstanding note. We entered into a Simple Agreement for Future Equity (“SAFE”) with a previous investor that for a limited time, includes the ability to redeem the value of the SAFE for cash instead of equity. If we raise in excess of $3,600,000 in this offering, we will use the excess to reduce or redeem the SAFE. We believe that redeeming the SAFE for cash is advantageous at this time and reduces dilution of shareholders. However, proceeds used towards repayment of that debt will not be available for future operations of the Company and may slow our growth in the short-term.

You will experience immediate dilution in the book value per share of the preferred stock you purchase. Certain outstanding convertible securities of the Company will convert upon or after the close of the sale of the Series A Preferred Stock in this offering. One of our SAFEs would convert into 355,541 shares of common stock at a later date but if the Company raises in excess of $3,600,000 in this offering, it will reduce or redeem this latter SAFE which will result in lowered dilution versus the SAFE converting to common stock. No shares of Series A Preferred will be issued pursuant to those SAFEs. However, if the Company does not raise in excess of $3,600,000 in this offering, the latter SAFE will convert in its entirety into shares of common stock, and, as a result, you will experience additional dilution of your investment interest in this offering. On December 3, 2019, we received an investment of $700,000 under a convertible note that will (subject to prescribed conditions) convert into Series A Preferred Stock upon the total sum raised by the Company under this offering reaching $1,600,000. It is believed that the conversion will result in 89,589 shares of Series A Preferred Stock being issued to the investor. See the section titled “Dilution” below for a more detailed discussion of the dilution you will incur if you purchase stock in this offering.

The Company has authorized a significant amount of Series A Preferred Stock beyond the amount issuable in this round of financing and to convertible security holders. No shareholder consent is required to issue these authorized shares. As such, the Company may issue additional Series A Preferred Stock in a future round on parity with your stock without first receiving the consent of preferred stockholders.

DILUTION

Dilution means a reduction in value, control, or earnings of the shares the investor owns.

Immediate dilution  

An early-stage Company typically sells its shares (or grants options over its shares) to its founders and early employees at a very low cash cost, because they are, in effect, putting their “sweat equity” into the Company. When the Company seeks cash investments from outside investors, like you, the new investors typically pay a much larger sum for their shares than the founders or earlier investors, which means that the cash value of your stake is diluted because all the shares are worth the same amount, and you paid more than earlier investors for your shares.

The following table illustrates the dilution that new investors will experience upon investment in the Company relative to existing holders of our securities. Because this calculation is based on the net tangible assets of the Company, we are calculating based our net tangible book value of $(1,166,382) as of December 31, 2019, as included in our audited financial statements. Note, no securities issuances from 2020 are reflected in the table to maintain consistency with the audited net tangible book value as of December 31, 2019.

The offering costs assumed in the following table includes up to $490,000 in commissions to SI Securities, LLC, as well as $162,906 in fixed legal, Edgarization, and accounting fees incurred for this offering.

Each table presents three scenarios for the convenience of the reader: a $800,000 raise from this offering (the minimum offering), a $3,000,000 raise from this offering, and a fully subscribed $5,600,000 raise from this offering (the maximum offering).

This second table below provides investors with an illustration of the dilution that would occur should all existing convertible notes, SAFEs, warrants and options outstanding as of December 31, 2019 be converted or exercised, respectively. While not every outstanding warrant or option may be exercised, and not every SAFE may convert to shares, as we have the option to repay in cash, we believe that it is important to identify the potential dilution that could occur upon the exercise of all existing securities issued by the Company. Additionally, we have included the automatic conversion of certain convertible notes in all levels of the raise because of the potential for those notes to convert based on additional financing outside of this Offering. Note, the table below uses an adjusted net tangible book value from the first table, which has been adjusted to reflect the potential new cash the Company would receive upon the exercise of issued warrants and options based on the current implied valuation of the Company. As above, no securities issuances from 2020 are reflected in the table to maintain consistency with the audited net tangible book value as of December 31, 2019.

In the next table we present a pro forma capitalization table that would result from the issuance of shares in this offering at various raise levels, along with the issuance of shares resulting from the automatic conversion of certain convertible notes based on the proceeds in this offering.

Pro Forma Loss Per Share

As identified in our audited financial statements, as of December 31, 2019, we recorded a basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders of $1.26 per share. The following table discloses the pro forma loss per share when including securities that would automatically convert into shares of the Company based on the proceeds of this offering.

(1) Includes the issuance of 69,150 shares of Common Stock Class A from the conversion of a convertible note issued on December 16, 2016, which automatically converts upon receiving $2.0 million from any preferred stock financing and is included as Exhibit 3.2.

The remaining securities that would automatically convert into shares of the Company based on the proceeds of this offering, the Series A Preferred Stock issued on December 3, 2019, would result in the issuance of Series A Preferred Stock and not common stock. Therefore, we have made no adjustments to the number of shares in the denominator for those shares. However, we did assume conversion of both securities as of the beginning of 2019 for purposes of making an adjustment to the net loss figure by adding back related interest expense of $5 thousand.

We did not give effect to the conversion of the $100 thousand safe note issued to REach Ventures 2017, L.P (“REach”) on August 28, 2017 because it was exchanged for warrants issued to REach on January 23, 2020. Further, we did not give effect to the conversion of a SAFE previously issued by the Company to Emergent Technology Holdings LP for $2.1 million (later reduced to $1.6m on February 4^th, 2020 through the Tripartite agreement.) because we intend to redeem it for cash at the completion of the offering as disclosed herein if we raise the maximum amount. Further this SAFE does not automatically convert until a Qualified offering of $5 million of preferred stock is completed. Both of these transactions are described in Note 20 of our financial statements.

Future dilution

Another important way of looking at dilution is the dilution that happens due to future actions by the Company. The investor’s stake in a company could be diluted due to the company issuing additional shares. In other words, when the Company issues more shares, the percentage of the Company that you own will go down, even though the value of the Company may go up. You will own a smaller piece of a larger company. This increase in number of shares outstanding could result from a stock offering (such as an initial public offering, another crowdfunding round, a venture capital round, angel investment), employees exercising stock options, or by conversion of certain instruments (e.g. convertible bonds, preferred shares or warrants) into stock.

If the Company decides to issue more shares, an investor could experience value dilution, with each share being worth less than before, and control dilution, with the total percentage an investor owns being less than before. There may also be earnings dilution, with a reduction in the amount earned per share (though this typically occurs only if the Company offers dividends, and most early stage companies are unlikely to offer dividends, preferring to invest any earnings into the Company).

The type of dilution that hurts early-stage investors most occurs when a company sells more shares in a “down round”, meaning at a lower valuation than in earlier offerings. An example of how this might occur is as follows (numbers are for illustrative purposes only):

This type of dilution might also happen upon conversion of convertible notes into shares. Typically, the terms of convertible notes issued by early-stage companies provide that in the event of another round of financing, the holders of the convertible notes get to convert their notes into equity at a “discount” to the price paid by the new investors, i.e., they get more shares than the new investors would for the same price. Additionally, convertible notes may have a “price cap” on the conversion price, which effectively acts as a share price ceiling. Either way, the holders of the convertible notes get more shares for their money than new investors. In the event that the financing is a “down round” the holders of the convertible notes will dilute existing equity holders, and even more than the new investors do, because they get more shares for their money. Investors should pay careful attention to the amount of convertible notes that the Company has issued (and may issue in the future), and the terms of those notes.

If you are making an investment expecting to own a certain percentage of the Company or expecting each share to hold a certain amount of value, it is important to realize how the value of those shares can decrease by actions taken by the Company. Dilution can make drastic changes to the value of each share, ownership percentage, voting control, and earnings per share.

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION AND SELLING SECURITYHOLDERS

Plan of Distribution

The Company is offering up to 718,870 shares of Series A Preferred Stock (the “Shares”) on a “best efforts” basis at a price of $7.79 per share. The minimum subscription is $997.12. SeedInvest Auto Invest participants have a lower investment minimum of $194.75.

The Company has engaged SI Securities, LLC as its sole and exclusive placement agent to assist in the placement of its securities. SI Securities is a registered broker-dealer, and member FINRA/SIPC. SI Securities, LLC is under no obligation to purchase any securities or arrange for the sale of any specific number or dollar amount of securities.

Other Terms

Except as set forth above, the Company is not under any contractual obligation to engage SI Securities, LLC to provide any services to the Company after this offering and has no present intent to do so. However, SI Securities, LLC may, among other things, introduce the Company to potential target businesses or assist the Company in raising additional capital, as needs may arise in the future. If SI Securities, LLC provides services to the Company after this offering, the Company may pay SI Securities, LLC fair and reasonable fees that would be determined at that time in an arm’s length negotiation.

SI Securities, LLC intends to use an online platform provided by SeedInvest Technology, LLC, an affiliate of SI Securities, LLC, at the domain name www.seedinvest.com (the “Online Platform”) to provide technology tools to allow for the sales of securities in this offering. The Online Platform is a technology platform utilized by SI Securities, LLC, and SI Securities, LLC has contracted separately with SeedInvest Technology, LLC to provide the technology tools outlined above. The Company is not party to any agreement with SeedInvest Technology, LLC. SI Securities, LLC will charge you a non-refundable transaction fee equal to 2% of the amount you invest (up to $300) at the time you subscribe for our shares. This fee will be refunded in the event the Company does not reach its minimum fundraising goal. In addition, SI Securities, LLC may engage selling agents in connection with the offering to assist with the placement of securities.

Selling Security holders

No securities are being sold for the account of security holders; all net proceeds of this offering will go to the Company.

Transfer Agent and Registrar 

Colonial Stock Transfer will serve as transfer agent to maintain shareholder information on a book-entry basis. We will not issue shares in physical or paper form. Instead, our shares will be recorded and maintained on our shareholder register.

Investors’ Tender of Funds and Return of Funds

After the Commission has qualified the Offering Statement, the Company will accept tenders of funds to purchase the Series A Preferred Stock. The Company may close on investments on a “rolling” basis (so not all investors will receive their shares on the same date), provided that the minimum offering amount has been met. Tendered funds will remain in escrow until both the minimum offering amount has been reached and a closing has occurred. However, in the event we have not sold the minimum amount of shares within 12 months of the qualification of this offering by the SEC, or sooner terminated by the Company, any money tendered by potential investors will be promptly returned by the Escrow Agent. Upon closing, funds tendered by investors will be made available to the Company for its use.

In the event that it takes some time for the Company to raise funds in this offering, the Company may rely on cash on hand, or may seek to raise funds by conducting a new offering of equity or debt securities.

In order to invest you will be required to subscribe to the offering via the Online Platform and agree to the terms of the offering, the subscription agreement, investors’ rights agreement, and any other relevant exhibits attached thereto.

Provisions of Note in Our Subscription Agreement and Investors’ Rights Agreement

Forum Selection Provision

Our subscription agreement and investors’ rights agreement include forum selection provisions that require any claims against the Company based on the subscription agreement and/or investors’ rights agreement not arising under the federal securities laws to be brought in a court of competent jurisdiction in the State of Georgia. These forum selection provisions may limit investors’ ability to bring claims in judicial forums that they find favorable to such disputes and may discourage lawsuits with respect to such claims. The Company has adopted these provisions to limit the time and expense incurred by its management to challenge any such claims. As a Company with a small management team, this provision allows its officers to not lose a significant amount of time travelling to any particular forum so they may continue to focus on operations of the Company. Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. We believe that the exclusive forum provision applies to claims arising under the Securities Act, but there is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce such a provision in this context. Section 27 of the Exchange Act creates exclusive federal jurisdiction over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. As a result, the exclusive forum provision will not apply to suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or any other claim for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction. Investors will not be deemed to have waived the Company’s compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.

Jury Trial Waiver 

The subscription agreement and investors’ rights agreement provide that subscribers waive the right to a jury trial of any claim they may have against us arising out of or relating to the subscription agreement or investors’ rights agreement. By signing the subscription agreement and investors’ rights agreement, the investor warrants that the investor has reviewed this waiver with the investor’s legal counsel, and knowingly and voluntarily waives his or her jury trial rights following consultation with the investor’s legal counsel. If we opposed a jury trial demand based on the waiver, a court would determine whether the waiver was enforceable given the facts and circumstances of that case in accordance with applicable case law. In addition, by agreeing to the provision, subscribers will not be deemed to have waived the Company’s compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. 

USE OF PROCEEDS TO ISSUER

Assuming a maximum raise of $5,600,000, the net proceeds of this offering would be approximately $4,947,094 after subtracting estimated offering costs of $490,000 to SI Securities, LLC in commissions, $100,406 in audit fees, $2,500 in Edgarization fees and $60,000 in legal fees. If Trust Stamp successfully raises the maximum amount under this raise, the Company intends to redeem the outstanding balance of a SAFE previously issued by the Company to Emergent Technology Holdings LP (“Emergent”), a related party of the Company, for a purchase price of $1,611,953.

Assuming a raise of $3,000,000 (representing 53.57% of the maximum offering amount), the net proceeds would be approximately $2,574,594 after subtracting estimated offering costs of $337,500 to SI Securities, LLC in commissions, $100,406 in audit fees, $2,500 in Edgarization fees, and $60,000 in legal fees. In such an event, Trust Stamp would adjust its use of proceeds by focusing expenditures on productizing and marketing its existing technologies and limiting Research & Development into new technologies to those that indicate the greatest potential for short term productization and revenue. The Company would also limit its speed of growth and limit the amount of additional recruiting of new employees to those necessary to drive revenue from its existing technologies together with strictly limited hiring to facilitate those Research & Development proposals that that indicate the greatest potential for short term productization and revenue.

Assuming a raise of the minimum of $800,000 representing 14.29% of the maximum offering amount, net proceeds would be approximately $567,261 after subtracting estimated offering costs of $69,833 to SI Securities, LLC in commissions, $100,406 in audit fees, $2,500 in Edgarization fees, and $60,000 in legal fees. In such an event, Trust Stamp would adjust its use of proceeds by focusing expenditures on productizing and marketing its existing technologies and limiting its speed of growth and the additional recruiting of new employees to those necessary to drive revenue from its existing technologies.

Please see the table below for a summary our intended use of proceeds from this offering:

Because the offering is a “best efforts”, we may close the offering without sufficient funds for all the intended purposes set out above, or even to cover the costs of this offering.

The Company reserves the right to change the above use of proceeds if management believes it is in the best interests of the Company

THE COMPANY’S BUSINESS

Overview

Trust Stamp was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on April 11, 2016 as “T Stamp Inc.” The business was originally founded as “T Stamp LLC”, formed on November 9, 2015 as a Georgia limited liability company. In 2016, the Company effected a “hive down” business reorganization whereby the business of the Company was transferred into to a newly formed, wholly owned subsidiary, which was T Stamp Inc. (i.e. the Company). As of the date of this offering, the Company is no longer a subsidiary of T Stamp LLC, and T Stamp LLC is no longer a majority owner of the Company.

Trust Stamp is an artificial intelligence company that develops proprietary identity solutions to help determine whether an individual is who they say they are and that they can be trusted, including Trust Stamp’s AI-powered facial biometrics that establish proof of life and are resistant to presentation attacks. In that example, a biometric capture can be converted into a hash that is unique to the user but cannot be reverse engineered and rebuilt into the user’s face or other biometric data, does not constitute PII and is treated as anonymized data under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and similar legislation.

Each hash can be stored in an Identity Lake ^TM and compared to all other hashes allowing our AI to predict if a single subject generated two or more hashes even if the subject has passed conventional KYC using (e.g.) falsified identity documents. Using this technology, the users’ hash can be used for re-authentication purposes including account recovery, password-less login, new account creation etc. across the organization or even within a consortium of organizations all in a low-cost and low friction delivery that is fast and secure.

Our technology is being used for enhanced due diligence, KYC/AML compliance and “second chance” approval for customer onboarding and account access together with the delivery of humanitarian and development services. Using our technology, an enterprise can approve more users, keep bad actors from accessing systems and services and retain existing users with a superior user experience.

We utilize micro-service architecture and highly scalable cloud computing resources with cutting-edge tools, power and agility such as GPU processing, neural networks and a Quantum Ledger Database to process data faster and more effectively than has previously been possible, as well as delivering products at a disruptively low cost that allows usage across multiple industries, including: 

Our Background

We entered the market building facial-biometric authentication systems for onboarding, fraud-detection & safety applications. This allowed us to raise capital, generate revenue to fund our core AI microservices, and refine our technology using live data with informed consent from users. Following usage based upon facial biometrics, we started the process of hashing biometric data from 3rd party biometric service providers, initially touchless palm, and fingerprint templates. Our business model is now focused on licensing ARR-generating pay-per-use services implementing our hashing technology, limiting future pilots to very-large-scale use cases, using execution partners for commoditized implementations, and deploying our hashing technology with sector leading channel partners.

Principal Products and Services

Trust Stamp’s most important technology is the Evergreen Hash^TM (also known as the EgHash^TM and MyHash^TM) combined with a data architecture that can use one or multiple sources of biometric or other identifying data. Once a “hash translation” algorithm is created, like-modality hashes are comparable regardless of their origin. The. Evergreen Hash protects against system and data redundancy providing a lifelong “digital-DNA” that can store (or pivot to) any type of KYC or relationship data with fields individually hashed or (salted and) encrypted, facilitating selective data sharing. Products utilizing the Evergreen Hash are Trust Stamp’s primary products, accounting for over 50% of its revenues in the twelve months ended December 31, 2019.

Business Model

Trust Stamp’s business model is that of a technology licensing company – we license our products to companies that in turn integrate our technology into products and services which they either sell or use for their own purposes. We intend to focus on licensing ARR generating pay-per-use services including:

In addition, we have developed an encrypted e-mail product (Trusted Mail - https://trustedmail.pro) using our facial recognition technology. This technology is held in a majority owned subsidiary entity: Trusted Mail Inc. Our intent is to license the Trusted Mail product primarily for enterprise use on a periodic, per-seat basis. We believe that the proceeds of this offering will allow us to:

If we see market acceptance of the Trusted Mail product that requires and justifies significant investment, we may invest the required capital from Trust Stamp’s resources or raise debt and/or equity capital at the subsidiary company level.

Distribution

By licensing our technology, we allow our customers to utilize our technology in a wide variety of applications. The Evergreen Hash can potentially be overlaid on any biometric or other identity data provider. Services can include:

Trust Stamp typically enters into licensing agreements with its customers, pursuant to which the customer pays for the use of Trust Stamp’s technologies on a periodic and/or volume-based basis.

The Market

Trust Stamp considers itself to be in the identity authentication market which is primarily comprised of biometric authentication providers. Trust Stamp’s key sub-markets are identity authentication for the purpose of account opening, access and fraud detection and the creation of tokenized identities to facilitate financial & societal inclusion. Management has evaluated the market potential for its services in part by reviewing the following reports and articles, none of which were commissioned by the Company and none are to be incorporated by reference.

One of the biggest contributors to current authentications problems is the use of passwords. Static passwords (i.e. the type of password that we typically use to login to various accounts and services every single day that, for the most part, remains the same from the moment it is created) have a number of weaknesses:

According to a 2015 report published by Oxford University Department of Computer Sciences and Mastercard, 21% of users forget passwords within 2 weeks, 25% of users fail to remember at least 1 password per day, and 1 out of 3 online transactions are abandoned at checkout due to a forgotten password.

On top of this, stored biometric images and templates represent a growing and unquantified financial, security and PR liability and are the subject of growing governmental, media and public scrutiny, as biometric data cannot be “changed” once they are hacked, as they are intimately linked to the user’s physical features and/or behaviors.

Our Solution

The proprietary Evergreen Hash uses a deep neural network to irreversibly convert biometric or other identifying data into a non-PII Hash that is unique to the user and can only be matched using our proprietary technology.

Our hashing and matching technology can maximize the effectiveness of all types of identity data while rendering it safer to use, store and share. Whatever the source of identity data, it can be stored and compared as a Hash. See the chart below for examples.

Competition

We can work with any identity data from any source potentially breaking vendor and modality lock-in, but our primary market target is the biometric service industry which is growing exponentially while being threatened by a consumer, media, and legislative backlash against storing biometric data.

In general, we compete for customer budget with any company in the identity authentication industry and our business plan calls for our capturing a little over one-tenth of one percent of the projected expenditure for biometric authentication services. Major competitors in this space include companies such as NEXT Biometrics, Gemalto, IDEMIA, Synaptics, Cognitec, Innovatrics, Suprema, FaceTec, Rank One Computing, Acuant and Mitek. However, we believe that, due to the uniqueness of our technology solution, the Company does not at this time have any direct competitors for the core hashing solutions upon which our business plan is focused.

The commercial advantage of our solution is our ability to work across providers and modalities and our intent to pursue a first-mover advantage including our global-scale-partnership which is achieving a network-effect in the global Humanitarian and Development market. We believe that this combination will make it unattractive for a potential competitor to replicate the 4-years and multi-million dollars that we have already expended to try and circumvent our multiple (and continuing) patent filings and/or offer a parallel product based upon a different technology. We believe that given sufficient time and resources, we can augment any biometric modalities including face, hand, iris, voice, gait, and behavior together with any other identifying data which places us in a unique position versus providers of biometric services. We are unaware of any other provider being able to offer or support a proliferation of authentication modalities in this fashion, and therefore, we believe we there are no other companies that directly compete with us in this space. If our go-to-market strategy is successful, biometric service providers can be a channel distributer, and not necessarily a competitor.

Employees

Given the geographic diversity of its team and to facilitate cost-effective administration, Trust Stamp secures the services of its permanent team members through a variety of administrative structures that include wholly owned subsidiaries, professional employer organizations and consulting contracts. The Company currently has 8 full-time employees and 1 part-time employee that work out of its headquarters at 75 5th St NW, Suite 2290 Atlanta, Georgia, 30308 USA and 1 full-time employee that operates from a satellite office in North Carolina. We have 10 full time employees working for our wholly owned subsidiary in Poland, and 1 full-time and 5 part-time employees that work remotely in the United Kingdom. We have 4 full-time employees working in the Philippines and 1 full-time employee working remotely in India. Our permanent team is augmented as needed by contract development and other staff on both long, and short-term basis.

Outsourcing

We design and develop our own products. We use an outsourcing company - 10Clouds SPA - for additional development staff as needed. Amazon Web Services provides cloud hosting and processing services, representing approximately 6-10% of our expenses in 2019. In addition, we utilize SourceFit, a company in the Philippines, for PEO services, which we anticipate will represent 3-4% of expenses in 2020.

Key Customers

Historically, the Company generated the majority of its income through a relationship with Synchrony Financial, in which services were provided pursuant to a Master Software Agreement and Statements of Work. In 2019, the Company has expanded its customer base to include relationships with Mastercard and other customers. We are continuing to develop other customer relationships and, while we value the relationship highly, management believes we are no longer financially dependent on our relationship with Synchrony Financial.

Regulation

Our business is not currently subject to any licensing requirements in any jurisdiction in which we operate other than the requirement to hold a business license in the City of Atlanta (with which we are in compliance). This does not mean that licensing requirements may not be introduced in one or more jurisdiction in which we operate, and such requirements could be burdensome and/or expensive or even impose requirements that we are unable to meet.

We are subject to substantial governmental regulation relating to our technology and will continue to be for the lifetime of our Company. By virtue of handling sensitive PII and biometric data, we are subject to numerous statutes related to data privacy and additional legislation and regulation should be anticipated in every jurisdiction in which we operate. Example federal (US) and European statutes we could be subject to are:

HIPAA and HITECH

Under the administrative simplification provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act “HITECH”), the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) issued regulations that establish uniform standards governing the conduct of certain electronic healthcare transactions and requirements for protecting the privacy and security of protected health information (“PHI”), used or disclosed by covered entities and business associates. Covered entities and business associates are subject to HIPAA and HITECH. Our subcontractors that create, receive, maintain, transmit, or otherwise process PHI on behalf of us are HIPAA “business associates” and must also comply with HIPAA as a business associate.

HIPAA and HITECH include privacy and security rules, breach notification requirements, and electronic transaction standards.

The Privacy Rule covers the use and disclosure of PHI by covered entities and business associates. The Privacy Rule generally prohibits the use or disclosure of PHI, except as permitted under the Rule. The Privacy Rule also sets forth individual patient rights, such as the right to access or amend certain records containing his or her PHI, or to request restrictions on the use or disclosure of his or her PHI.

The Security Rule requires covered entities and business associates to safeguard the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of electronically transmitted or stored PHI by implementing administrative, physical, and technical safeguards. Under HITECH’s Breach Notification Rule, a covered entity must notify individuals, the Secretary of the HHS, and in some circumstances, the media of breaches of unsecured PHI.

In addition, we may be subject to state health information privacy and data breach notification laws, which may govern the collection, use, disclosure, and protection of health-related and other personal information. State laws may be more stringent, broader in scope, or offer greater individual rights with respect to PHI than HIPAA, and state laws may differ from each other, which may complicate compliance efforts.

Entities that are found to be in violation of HIPAA as the result of a failure to secure PHI, a complaint about our privacy practices or an audit by HHS, may be subject to significant civil and criminal fines and penalties and additional reporting and oversight obligations if such entities are required to enter into a resolution agreement and corrective action plan with HHS to settle allegations of HIPAA non-compliance.

GDPR

The EU-wide General Data Protection Regulation imposes onerous accountability obligations requiring data controllers and processors to maintain a record of their data processing and policies. It requires data controllers to implement more stringent operational requirements for processors and controllers of personal data, including, for example, transparent and expanded disclosure to data subjects (in a concise, intelligible and easily accessible form) about how their personal information is to be used, imposes limitations on retention of information, increases requirements pertaining to health data and pseudonymized (i.e., key-coded) data, introduces mandatory data breach notification requirements and sets higher standards for data controllers to demonstrate that they have obtained valid consent for certain data processing activities. Fines for non-compliance with the GDPR will be significant—the greater of €20 million or 4% of global turnover. The GDPR provides that EU member states may introduce further conditions, including limitations, to make their own further laws and regulations limiting the processing of genetic, biometric or health data.

In addition, at any given time the Company may have one or more Provisional Patents filed pending preparation of a utility patent application. The Company holds issued trademarks for each of “Trust Stamp” and “Trusted Mail” and has a number of additional trademark applications pending.