PROPOSAL ONE – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The directors of the Company are elected at each annual general meeting of shareholders to hold office until the next annual general meeting of shareholders or until their successors are duly elected or appointed, unless their office is earlier vacated in accordance with the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) (“BCBCA”). Since the 2019 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, no fees have been paid to any third party to identify or evaluate a potential director nominee.

Information concerning the nominees for election as directors is set forth below under “Directors and Officers – Nominees for the Board.” In the absence of instructions to the contrary, the Common Shares represented by proxies will be voted FOR each of the nominees listed below. Management does not contemplate that any of the nominees will be unable to serve as a director. All nominees are current directors of the Company.

Vote Required for Approval

Subject to the Company’s Majority Voting in Director Elections Policy (see “Statement of Corporate Governance Practices – Majority Voting Policy” on page 15):

The allowable votes with respect to the election of directors (Proposal One) are “For” and “Withhold”. “Withhold” votes are only relevant in connection with the Company’s Majority Voting in Director Elections Policy (see “Statement of Corporate Governance Practices – Majority Voting Policy” on page 15). Directors are elected individually, and cumulative voting is not permitted in the election of directors. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not relevant to and will have no effect on this proposal regarding the election of directors.

The director nominees are: Messrs. Damola Adamolekun, Anton Drescher, Karl Hanneman, Stuart Harshaw, Marcelo Kim, Stephen Lang and Thomas Weng.

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES.

Nominees for the Board:

The directors of the Company are elected at each annual general meeting of shareholders and hold office until the next annual general meeting of shareholders or until their successors are duly elected or appointed, unless their office is earlier vacated in accordance with the BCBCA. The following is a brief biographical description of each director nominee, which includes a discussion of the skills and attributes of each director, and that, in part, led the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee (“CGNC”) to conclude that each respective director should continue to serve as a member of the Board.

Pursuant to an Investor Rights Agreement dated December 28, 2016 between Paulson & Co. Inc. (“Paulson”) and the Company (“IRA”), the Company has agreed with Paulson that, so long as Paulson, together with its affiliates, owns in the aggregate 20% or more of the issued and outstanding Common Shares, Paulson is entitled to designate two nominees for election to the Board. Paulson and its affiliates currently own 59,593,314 Common Shares in the aggregate, representing approximately 31.77% of the currently outstanding Common Shares, and Paulson is therefore entitled to nominate two persons for election to the Board. Paulson has determined to nominate Marcelo Kim, the current Chair of the Board, and Damola Adamolekun for re-election to the Board.

Damola Adamolekun – Mr. Adamolekun is a Vice President at Paulson, where he has played a vital role in the sourcing and subsequent management of a number of the firm’s largest investments since 2016. Prior to joining Paulson, Mr. Adamolekun worked in the Investment Banking Division of Goldman Sachs since 2011 and as a Private Equity Associate in TPG Capital’s North American Buyout Group since 2013. Mr. Adamolekun received a Bachelor of Arts in Economics and Urban Studies from Brown University and a Masters of Business Administration from the Harvard Business School. Mr. Adamolekun is one of the two nominees entitled to be put forward by Paulson under the IRA.

Anton Drescher – Mr. Drescher has been a Certified Management Accountant since 1981. He was a director (from 2007 to July 2019) of Trevali Mining Corporation, a public mining company listed on the TSX, a director (since 2010) of Corvus Gold Inc., a public mineral exploration company listed on the TSX, a director (since 1996) and Chief Financial Officer (since 2012) of Xiana Mining Inc. (formerly Dorato Resources Inc.), a public mineral exploration company listed on the TSXV, a director (from April 2017 to November 2019) of RavenQuest BioMed Inc., a company listed on the CSE, and the Chief Financial Officer and a director (since 1994) of Oculus VisionTech Inc., a public company involved in watermarking of film and data and listed on the TSXV and the OTC Bulletin Board. Mr. Drescher is also the President (since 1979) of Westpoint Management Consultants Limited, a private company engaged in tax and accounting consulting for business reorganizations, and the President (since 1998) of Harbour Pacific Capital Corp., a private company involved in regulatory filings for businesses in Canada. Mr. Drescher has served on the Board since 1991. The CGNC recommended that the Company nominate Mr. Drescher for re-election to the Board due to his significant financial and accounting experience, together with his director experience with other mining and mineral exploration companies.

Karl Hanneman – Mr. Hanneman has been the Chief Executive Officer of the Company since January 31, 2017. Prior to that he was the Chief Operating Officer of the Company since March 26, 2015 and was, prior to that, the General Manager for the Company. Mr. Hanneman has been with the Company since May 2010, during which time he was responsible for assembling the Alaska team and served as Manager of the Company’s Livengood Gold Project (the “Livengood Gold Project”). Mr. Hanneman has more than 35 years of Alaska-based mining industry experience including 12 years for Teck Resources Limited, where he served as Alaska Regional Manager throughout the period of underground exploration, feasibility study, project design, and permitting at Pogo, and then as Director, Corporate Affairs, Alaska for Teck, serving as the senior corporate representative in Alaska supporting both the Red Dog and Pogo Mines. Mr. Hanneman has been involved in industry leadership positions throughout his career as President, Council of Alaska Producers; President, Alaska Miners Association; Governor’s appointee to the Alaska Minerals Commission; Director, Resource Development Council; and Director, Fairbanks Chamber of Commerce. Mr. Hanneman has a Bachelor of Science Degree in Mining Engineering, magna cum laude, from the University of Alaska. The CGNC recommended that the Company nominate Mr. Hanneman for re-election to the Board due to his knowledge of the Company and the Livengood Gold Project and his extensive experience with other mining and mineral exploration companies.

Stuart Harshaw – Mr. Harshaw is a seasoned mining executive with over 25 years’ experience at Inco and Vale. Most recently, as Vice President of Ontario Operations for Vale, Mr. Harshaw was responsible for the Base Metal operations of Vale in Ontario, which includes 6 mines, a mill, smelter, nickel refinery, cobalt refinery, precious metal refinery and hydroelectric production facilities. Previously, he was Vice-President, Marketing & Sales, Base Metals for Vale International, where he was responsible for the marketing and sales of base metals in the Asia Pacific region and the management of Nickel Refineries in Asia, specifically in Japan, China, Taiwan and a joint venture in Korea. Mr. Harshaw earned a Bachelor of Science in Metallurgical Engineering from Queen’s University and an MBA from Laurentian University. The CGNC recommended that the Company nominate Mr. Harshaw for election to the Board due to his extensive executive experience and experience with other mining and mineral exploration companies.

Marcelo Kim – Mr. Kim has been a Partner at Paulson since 2011, where he oversees natural resource investments, specializing in gold, base metals, bulk commodities and oil & gas. Prior to that, commencing in 2009, he was a generalist analyst covering event arbitrage investment opportunities across broad sectors and capital structures. Mr. Kim is a board member of Templar Energy and Midas Gold. He is a graduate of Yale University, where he received his Bachelor of Arts in Economics with honors. Mr. Kim has served as Chair of the Board since his appointment in December 2016, and is one of the two individuals nominated for election to the Board by Paulson under the IRA. Mr. Kim’s extensive experience in the gold industry and position with Paulson, the Company’s largest shareholder, enable him to provide valuable counsel to the Company.

Stephen Lang – Mr. Lang is a Mining Engineer with over 30 years of experience in the mining industry. He currently serves as Chair of Centerra Gold Inc. (since May 2012). Previously, Mr. Lang was President, Chief Executive Officer and a member of the board of directors of Centerra Gold Inc. (from 2008 to 2012) and of Allied Nevada Gold Corporation (from 2013 to 2015). Prior to that, he held senior positions at Stillwater Mining Company, Barrick Gold Corporation, Rio Algom and Kinross Gold/Amax. Mr. Lang earned a Bachelor and Masters of Science in Mining Engineering from the University of Missouri-Rolla. Mr. Lang has served on the Board since February 2014. The CGNC recommended that the Company nominate Mr. Lang for re-election to the Board due to his significant experience in the mining industry, together with his director and leadership experience with other mining companies.

Thomas Weng – Mr. Weng has more than 25 years of experience in the financial services sector. Mr. Weng is currently Co-Founding Partner with Alta Capital Partners, a provider of investment banking services (since February 2011). From February 2007 to January 2011, Mr. Weng was a Managing Director at Deutsche Bank and Head of Equity Capital Markets for Metals and Mining throughout the Americas and Latin America, across all industry segments. Prior to 2007, Mr. Weng held various senior positions at Pacific Partners, an alternative investment firm, and Morgan Stanley and Bear Stearns. Mr. Weng graduated from Boston University with a Bachelor of Arts in Economics. Mr. Weng has served on the Board since August 2013. The CGNC recommended Mr. Weng for re-election to the Board due to his significant financial experience together with his advisory experience in the metals and mining space.

Executive Officers:

The executive officers of the Company are appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the Board and hold office until the expiration of their employment agreement, if such officer has entered into an employment agreement with the Company or one of its affiliates, or their earlier death, retirement, resignation or removal. The following is a brief biographical description of each current executive officer of the Company.

Karl Hanneman, Chief Executive Officer – See “Directors and Officers – Nominees for the Board” above.

David Cross, Chief Financial Officer – Mr. Cross has been the Chief Financial Officer of the Company since May 11, 2015. Mr. Cross is a partner in the firm of Cross Davis & Company, LLP, Chartered Professional Accountants (“Cross Davis”), an accounting firm focused on providing accounting, management services and guidance related to accounting policies, corporate governance and financial regulatory requirements for publicly listed companies reporting under both IFRS and US GAAP. Cross Davis provides corporate accounting support to the Company under a consulting agreement. Mr. Cross began his accounting career at a Chartered Accountant firm in 1997 and obtained his CGA designation in 2004. Mr. Cross’ past experience consists of officer, director and senior management positions, including five years at Davidson & Company LLP, where he spent time as a Manager, a member of their Technical Accounting Committee and a member of their IFRS Committee.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings/Cease Trade Orders, Bankruptcies, Penalties or Sanctions

For the purposes hereof, the term “order” means:

Stephen Lang was a director of Allied Nevada Gold Corp. (now Hycroft Mining Corporation) which, together with certain of its domestic direct and indirect subsidiaries, filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware on March 10, 2015. Effective October 22, 2015, Allied Nevada Gold Corp has completed its financial restructuring process and has emerged from Chapter 11. Mr. Lang resigned as a director of Allied Nevada Gold Corp on October 8, 2015.

On March 10, 2010, the TSX Venture Exchange, Inc. (“TSXV”) rendered a decision with respect to a review concerning certain unauthorized loans by Xiana to Trevali Mining Corporation. As part of its decision, the TSXV required Mr. Drescher (who was a director of Xiana at the relevant time) to seek prior written approval from the TSXV should he propose to be involved with any other TSXV listed issuer as a director and/or officer. On May 14, 2010, the TSX, upon review of the TSXV’s decision, required Mr. Drescher to seek approval from the TSX should he propose to be involved with any other TSX listed issuers as a director and/or officer. In addition, the TSX required Mr. Drescher to inform the TSX of any future actions commenced against him by any regulatory entity. Subsequently, Mr. Drescher applied to the TSX for reconsideration of the abovementioned restrictions and, on May 1, 2013, the TSX agreed to remove all such restrictions.

STATEMENT OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

NYSE American Corporate Governance

The Common Shares are listed on the NYSE American (formerly NYSE MKT). Section 110 of the NYSE American Company Guide permits the NYSE American to consider the laws, customs and practices of foreign issuers in relaxing certain NYSE American listing criteria, and to grant exemptions from NYSE American listing criteria based on these considerations. Currently, in respect to certain matters discussed below, the Company follows Canadian practices that differ from the requirements of the NYSE American. The Company posts on its website at www.ithmines.com a description of the significant ways in which the Company’s governance practices differ from those followed by domestic companies pursuant to NYSE American standards. The contents of the Company’s website are not incorporated into this report and the reference to such website is intended to be an inactive textual reference only.

A description of the significant ways in which the Company’s governance practices differ from those followed by U.S. domestic companies pursuant to NYSE American standards is as follows:

Shareholder Meeting Quorum Requirement: The NYSE American minimum quorum requirement for a shareholder meeting is one-third of the outstanding shares of common stock. In addition, a company listed on NYSE American is required to state its quorum requirement in its bylaws. The Company’s quorum requirement is set forth in its articles. The Company’s articles provide that the quorum for the transaction of business at a meeting of shareholders is two persons who are, or who represent by proxy, shareholders who, in the aggregate, hold at least 5% of the issued shares entitled to be voted at a meeting. The Company obtained an exemption from the quorum requirements of the NYSE American (then NYSE MKT) upon its initial listing.

Shareholder Approval Requirements: NYSE American requires a listed company to obtain the approval of its shareholders for certain types of securities issuances, including private placements that may result in the issuance of common shares (or securities convertible into common shares) equal to 20% or more of presently outstanding shares for less than the greater of book or market value of the shares. Under the rules of the TSX, shareholder approval is not generally required for a private placement unless (i) the proposed issued price is lower than the allowable discount to the market price, (ii) if the issue price is less than the market price, the aggregate number of shares issued in the private placement is greater than 25% of the number of shares outstanding, on a non-diluted basis, prior to completion of the private placement or (iii) during any six-month period, securities are issued to insiders entitling them to purchase more than 10% of the number of listed securities outstanding, on a non-diluted basis, prior to the completion of the first private placement to an insider during such period. The Company will seek, and has previously obtained, a waiver from NYSE American’s shareholder approval requirements in circumstances where the securities issuance does not trigger such a requirement under the rules of the TSX.

The NYSE American Company Guide also provides that shareholder approval is required for the participation of directors and officers in a private placement pursuant to which the issuance of common shares to such officers and directors at a discount to market is considered an equity compensation arrangement. Under the rules of the TSX, shareholder approval is not generally required in respect of a private placement to directors and officers of the issuer unless, during any six-month period, securities are issued to insiders entitling them to purchase more than 10% of the number of listed securities outstanding, on a non-diluted basis, prior to the completion of the first private placement to an insider during such period.

Statement of Corporate Governance Practices

The Board is committed to sound corporate governance practices that are both in the interest of its shareholders and contribute to effective and efficient decision making. The Company has reviewed its corporate governance practices in light of National Policy 58-201 Corporate Governance Guidelines (“NP 58-201”) of the Canadian Securities Administrators. In certain cases, the Company’s practices comply with the guidelines; however, the Board considers that some of the guidelines are not suitable for the Company at its current stage of development and therefore these guidelines have not been adopted. National Instrument 58-101 (“NI 58-101”) of the Canadian Securities Administrators mandates disclosure of corporate governance practices for non-Venture Issuers in Form 58-101F1, which disclosure is set out below.

Board Mandate and Oversight of Risk Management

The Board has not adopted a written mandate. At this stage of the Company’s development, the Board does not believe it is necessary to adopt a written mandate as sufficient guidance is found in the applicable corporate legislation and regulatory policies. The mandate of a board of directors, as prescribed by the BCBCA, is to manage or supervise the management of the business and affairs of the Company and to act with a view to the best interests of the Company. In doing so, the Board oversees the management of the Company’s affairs directly and through the operation of its standing committees. In fulfilling its mandate, the Board, among other matters, is responsible for reviewing and approving the Company’s overall business strategies and its annual business plan; reviewing and approving the annual corporate budget and forecast; reviewing and approving significant capital investments outside the approved budget; reviewing major strategic initiatives to ensure that the Company’s proposed actions are in accordance with its stated shareholder objectives; reviewing succession planning; assessing management’s performance; reviewing and approving the financial statements, reports and other disclosures issued to shareholders; ensuring the effective operation of the Board; and safeguarding shareholders’ equity interests through the optimum utilization of the Company’s capital resources. The Board also takes responsibility for identifying the principal risks of the Company’s business and for ensuring these risks are effectively monitored and mitigated to the extent reasonably practicable.

The Board has overall responsibility for risk oversight with a focus on the most significant risks facing the Company. The Board relies upon its Chief Executive Officer (the “CEO”) to supervise day-to-day risk management. The CEO reports directly to the Board and certain Board committees on such matters, as appropriate.

The Board delegates certain oversight responsibilities to its committees. For example, the Audit Committee is primarily responsible for the integrity of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting and management information systems and for the Company’s policies regarding corporate disclosure and communications.

Director Independence

A director of a company is considered “independent” of an issuer within the meaning of NP 58-201 if he or she has no direct or indirect “material relationship” with that issuer. A “material relationship” is a relationship which could, in the view of the issuer’s board of directors, reasonably interfere with the exercise of a director’s independent judgment. Under Section 803 of the NYSE American Company Guide, a director of an issuer is considered “independent” if he or she is not an executive officer or employee of the issuer (and has not been so in the past three years) and satisfies certain other requirements, and the issuer’s board of directors affirmatively determines that the director does not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. The Board has determined that each current director, other than Mr. Hanneman (the current CEO), is independent under both NYSE American listing standards and NP 58-201.

The independent directors routinely meet as a group without members of management or non-independent directors and exercise their responsibilities for independent oversight of management with the guidance of the Chair, who is independent.

Position Descriptions

The Board has not developed a written position description for the Chair of the Board, for the chair of any of its standing committees or for the CEO. To date, given the size of the Company and its stage of development, the Board does not believe that formal written descriptions of these positions are required, and that good business practices and the common law provide guidance as to what is expected of each position. Although the Board has not developed a formal position description for the Chair, it considers that the Chair’s role is to provide independent leadership to the Board.

The positions of Chair and CEO are separate. Under the IRA, a nominee of Paulson is to be the Chair. Marcelo Kim, one of Paulson’s nominees, is the current Chair. Although the Board has determined that Mr. Kim is independent, in light of the relationship of Mr. Kim with Paulson, the Company’s largest shareholder, the Board has appointed Mr. Stephen Lang, the former Chair, as Lead Independent Director.

Director Term Limits and Other Mechanisms of Board Renewal

The Company does not have a policy with respect to director term limits, director retirement or board renewal. Since the Company commenced its current operations in 2006, there has been an ongoing renewal of the Board as the skill sets required on the Board have changed over time. As a result of such renewal, four of seven director nominees have served on the Board for less than five years (including one director who has served on the Board for less than four years and three directors who have served on the Board for less than three years). Each year, the CGNC reviews the current make-up of the Board and the existing skill sets and experience of the directors to determine if the current directors are appropriate for re-election and will continue to make an effective contribution and whether or not additional or replacement directors are required, given the Company’s anticipated activities and the requirements of the IRA. The Board considers that the adoption of a fixed policy with respect to board renewal or age or term related retirement is not appropriate for the Company, and that the yearly review is a more appropriate and effective way of addressing the issue of the correct composition of the Board and Board renewal.

Policies Regarding the Representation of Women on the Board

The Board has not adopted a written policy relating to the identification and nomination of women directors. Instead, the charter of the CGNC provides, with respect to the nomination of directors, that the responsibility of the CGNC in identifying and recommending qualified candidates is to take into consideration such factors as it deems appropriate, including judgement, skill, diversity, experience with businesses and other organizations of comparable size, and the need for particular expertise on the Board. Neither the Board nor the CGNC specifically considers the level of representation of women on the Board when considering candidates for election or re-election as the intent of the CGNC is to recommend what it considers to be the “best” candidates, and it does so by reviewing qualifications of prospective Board nominees and determines their relevance taking into consideration the then current Board composition and the anticipated skills required to round out the capabilities of the Board.

Similarly, the Board does not consider the level of representation of women in executive officer positions when making executive officer appointments. At the present time, the Company has a very small management team reflective of its current operations and financial resources, and does not anticipate a material expansion in its management ranks until such time as the Company may proceed with construction of the Livengood Gold Project. The Company is committed to the fundamental principles of equal employment opportunities and treating people fairly, with respect and dignity, and to offering equal employment opportunities based upon an individual’s qualifications and performance – free from discrimination or harassment because of race, color, ancestry, place of origin, religion, gender, sexual orientation, age, marital status, family status, or physical or mental disability. The Company’s policy is to select candidates for employment, including executive officer positions, based solely upon experience, skill and ability of candidates.

The Company does not currently have any women directors and has not adopted any targets regarding women on its Board. As noted above, in evaluating potential nominees to the Board, the CGNC focuses on the current Board composition and the anticipated skills required to round out the capabilities of the Board, including the knowledge and diversity of its membership.

The Company does not presently have any women executive officers and has not adopted any targets regarding women in executive officer positions. As noted above, the Company is an equal opportunity employer, whereby candidates for employment as executive officers are selected based upon primary considerations such as experience, skill and ability.

Orientation and Continuing Education

At the current time, the Board provides ad hoc orientation for new directors. New directors are briefed on strategic plans, short, medium and long term corporate objectives, the history and current status of the Company’s Livengood Gold Project (the Company’s sole mineral property) and the ongoing work programs concerning the Livengood Gold Project, business risks and mitigation strategies, corporate governance guidelines and existing company policies. There is no formal orientation for new members of the Board. This is considered to be appropriate given the Company’s size and current level of operations. If warranted by the growth of the Company’s operations, the Board would consider implementing a formal orientation process.

The skills and knowledge of the Board are such that no formal continuing education process is deemed necessary, as the Board is comprised of individuals with extensive experience in the mineral exploration and mining industry, as well as in running and managing public companies in the natural resource sector. Several directors are also directors of other natural resource companies. Board members are encouraged to communicate with management, auditors and technical consultants to keep themselves current with industry trends and developments and changes in legislation. They also have full access to the Company’s records. The Company will pay the reasonable costs of attendance by directors at continuing education courses and seminars with respect to corporate governance, director’s duties and obligations and similar matters.

Ethical Business Conduct

The Board expects management to enhance shareholder value by executing the Company’s business plan and meeting performance goals and objectives according to the highest ethical standards. To this end, in September 2006 the Board adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code”) for its directors, officers, employees and, in appropriate cases, consultants. Copies of the Code are available on the Company’s website at www.ithmines.com under “Company – Corporate Governance” or at www.sedar.com. Training with respect to the Code is included in the orientation of new employees. To ensure familiarity with the Code, directors, officers and employees are asked to read the Code and sign a compliance certificate annually. Directors, officers and employees are required to report any known violations of the Code to the Chair of the Audit Committee or to the Company’s outside U.S. or Canadian counsel.

Since the beginning of the Company’s most recent fiscal year there have not been any material change reports or current reports on Form 8-K filed that pertain to any conduct of a director or executive officer that constitutes a departure from the Code or a waiver of the Code by the Board. In addition to the provisions of the Code, directors and senior officers are bound by the provisions of the Company’s Articles and the BCBCA, which set forth the manner of dealing with any conflicts of interest. Specifically, any director who has a material interest in a particular transaction is required to disclose such interest and to refrain from voting with respect to the approval of any such transaction.

In September 2006, the Board also adopted a “Share Trading Policy” (revised March 15, 2016) which prescribes rules with respect to trading in securities of the Company when there is any undisclosed material information or a pending material development. Strict compliance with the provisions of this policy is required, with a view to enhancing investor confidence in the Company’s securities and contributing to ethical business conduct by the Company’s personnel. In 2006, the Board also created the Health, Occupational, Safety & Environmental Committee (renamed the “Technical Committee” in 2014) in order to focus on reviewing project design and operational aspects of any proposed mine development and to reflect the Company’s continuing commitment to improving the environment and ensuring that its activities are carried out in a safe, sustainable and environmentally sound manner.

Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy

The Company does not currently have a policy relating to hedging or pledging transactions in place for directors, officers or employees and such persons may therefore purchase financial instruments, including, for greater certainty, prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars or units of exchange funds that are designed to hedge or offset a decrease in market value of equity securities granted as compensation, or pledge Common Shares as collateral for loans. The Board will assess the need and consider implementing such a policy in the future, if warranted.

Communications with the Board

Interested parties, including shareholders of the Company, desiring to communicate with members of the Board, any non-management director or the independent directors as a group, may do so by mailing a request to the Corporate Secretary of International Tower Hill Mines Ltd. at 2300-1177 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6E 2K3. Any such communication should state the number of shares beneficially owned, if any, by the interested party making the communication. The Secretary will forward any such communication to the Chair of the CGNC and will forward such communication to other members of the Board, as appropriate, provided that such communication addresses a legitimate business issue. Any communication relating to accounting, internal controls, auditing or fraud will be forwarded to the chair of the Audit Committee.

Majority Voting Policy

On April 25, 2013, the Board adopted a majority voting policy (the “Majority Voting Policy”). The Majority Voting Policy was subsequently modified on April 13, 2016. Pursuant to the Majority Voting Policy, the form of proxy for meetings of the shareholders of the Company at which directors are to be elected provides the option of voting in favor, or withholding from voting, for each individual nominee to the Board. If, with respect to any particular nominee, the number of shares withheld from voting exceeds the number of shares voted in favor of the nominee, then the nominee will be considered to have not received the support of the shareholders, and such nominee is expected to submit his or her resignation to the Board, to take effect on acceptance by the Board.

Following receipt of a resignation submitted pursuant to the Majority Voting Policy, the CGNC is to consider whether or not there are exceptional circumstances which would justify not accepting such resignation. Absent such exceptional circumstances, the CGNC shall recommend to the Board that the Board accept the resignation. If the CGNC determines that exceptional circumstances exist that would justify not accepting the resignation, the CGNC will prepare a report to the Board containing a recommendation to the Board not to accept the resignation, and clearly identifying and setting out the basis for determining such exceptional circumstances exist.

Within 90 days following the applicable shareholders’ meeting, the Board shall make its decision whether or not to accept a resignation pursuant to the Majority Voting Policy, based upon the CGNC’s recommendation. Absent such exceptional circumstances as may be set forth in the report of the CGNC, the Board shall accept the resignation. Following the Board’s decision, the Company shall publicly disclose by news release the Board’s decision whether to accept the resignation, including the reasons for rejecting the resignation, if applicable. A copy of the applicable news release shall be provided to each stock exchange on which the Company’s securities are then listed.

If a resignation pursuant to the Majority Voting Policy is accepted, subject to any corporate law restrictions, the Board may:

Directors who do not submit their resignation in accordance with the Majority Voting Policy will not be re-nominated for election at the next shareholders’ meeting. The Majority Voting Policy applies only in the case of an uncontested shareholders’ meeting, meaning a meeting where the number of nominees for election as directors is equal to the number of directors to be elected. A copy of the Majority Voting Policy is available at the Company’s website at www.ithmines.com.

COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD

Committees of the Board are an integral part of the Company’s governance structure. At the present time, the Board has four standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and the Technical Committee. Current details of the composition of the standing committees of the Board are as follows:

Audit Committee

Members: Anton Drescher (Chair), Stuart Harshaw and Thomas Weng

The Board has a standing Audit Committee of three members. All members of the Audit Committee are independent within the meaning of National Instrument 52-110 Audit Committees of the Canadian Securities Administrators, the NYSE American listing standards and Rule 10A-3(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and satisfy the composition requirements of Section 803(B)(2)(a) of the NYSE American Company Guide. The Board has determined that Anton Drescher is an “audit committee financial expert” as that term is defined in Item 407(d) of Regulation S-K. As an “audit committee financial expert,” Mr. Drescher satisfies the NYSE American financial literacy and sophistication requirements. The Audit Committee has adopted a charter that describes its responsibilities in detail. The charter is available on the Company’s website at www.ithmines.com.

The primary responsibility for financial reporting, internal controls over financial reporting, compliance with laws and regulations, and ethics rests with the management of the Company. The Audit Committee’s primary purpose is to oversee the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and corporate policies and controls, the independent auditor’s selection, retention, qualifications, objectivity and independence and the performance of the Company’s internal controls on financial reporting function. The Audit Committee reviews the financial information that will be provided to the shareholders and others, the systems of internal controls that management and the Board have established and the audit process. The Audit Committee also reviews the audited financial statements and management’s discussion and analysis thereof and discusses them with the management of the Company. Additional information about the Audit Committee’s role in corporate governance can be found in the committee’s charter.

Compensation Committee

Members: Thomas Weng (Chair), Damola Adamolekun and Stuart Harshaw

The Board has a standing Compensation Committee of three members. All members of the Compensation Committee are independent directors. As set out in its written charter, the purpose of the Compensation Committee is to implement and oversee human resources and compensation policies and best practices for recommendation to the Board for approval and implementation. The Compensation Committee charter is available on the Company’s website at www.ithmines.com. The Compensation Committee has the duty and responsibility to ensure that the Company has in place programs to attract and develop management of the highest caliber and a process to provide for the orderly succession of management. It also has the duty to assess and report to the Board, on an annual basis, on the performance of the CEO for the prior year, and to review, on an annual basis, the salary, bonus and other benefits, direct and indirect, of the CEO and make recommendations in respect thereof for approval of the Board. Additionally, the Compensation Committee reviews, on an annual basis, the proposed compensation for all other officers of the Company after considering the recommendations of the CEO, and makes recommendations in respect thereof for approval by the Board. The Compensation Committee may not delegate these duties and responsibilities, however, the Compensation Committee may, in its sole discretion, retain, at the expense of the Company, such legal, financial, compensation or other advisors or consultants as it may deem necessary or advisable in order to properly and fully perform its duties and responsibilities.

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

Members: Stephen Lang (Chair), Anton Drescher and Marcelo Kim

The Board has a standing Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of three members. All members of the CGNC are independent directors. As set out in its written charter, the primary roles of the CGNC include developing and monitoring the effectiveness of the Company’s corporate governance system and ensuring the Company is in line with the proper delineation of the roles, duties and responsibilities of the Company, the Board and its committees. The CGNC charter is available on the Company’s website at www.ithmines.com. The CGNC also establishes procedures for the identification of new nominees to the Board, leads the candidate selection process, and develops and implements orientation procedures for new directors. Currently, the CGNC does not have a policy allowing for the consideration of director candidates recommended by security holders, but would consider such nominees if presented to the CGNC on a timely basis in the same manner as any other potential candidates. The CGNC is also responsible for assessing the effectiveness of directors, the Board and the various committees of the Board and assisting the Board in setting the objectives of the CEO and evaluating the performance of the CEO.

The CGNC is responsible for reviewing proposals for new nominees to the Board and conducting such background reviews, assessments, interviews and other procedures as it believes necessary to ascertain the suitability of a particular nominee. In determining whether a candidate is qualified to be nominee for a position on the Board, the committee will take into consideration factors such as it deems appropriate, including judgment, skill, diversity, experience with businesses and other organizations of comparable size and the need for particular expertise on the Board. The selection of potential nominees for review by the CGNC is generally the result of recruitment efforts by the individual Board members or the CEO, including both formal and informal discussions among Board members and with the CEO, and is usually based upon the desire to have a specific set of skills or expertise included on the Board.

The appointment of new directors, either to fill vacancies or to add additional directors as permitted by applicable corporate legislation, or the nomination for election as a director of a person not currently a director by the shareholders at an annual general meeting of shareholders, is carried out by the Board, based on the recommendation of the CGNC. Once the names of any suggested nominees are received by the CGNC, the CGNC carries out such reviews as it determines to be appropriate, including interviews with the proposed nominee, to determine if the proposed nominee possesses the required skill set being sought by the Board and would be an appropriate “fit” for election to the Board. The CGNC then makes a recommendation to the full Board as to the nomination of the identified individual for election as a director, for appointment as a replacement for a director who has resigned or for appointment as an additional director, as applicable. In addition, prior to each annual general meeting of shareholders of the Company, the CGNC carries out a review of the then current Board composition and makes recommendations as to the individuals, whether existing directors or non-directors, it considers should be nominated for election as a director. With respect to the seven nominees for election as a director at the Meeting disclosed in this Proxy Statement, no holder of Common Shares, non-management director, chief executive officer, other executive officer, third-party search firm, or other source recommended any specific nominee, except that Messrs. Kim and Adamolekun were nominated by Paulson under the IRA.

Technical Committee

Members: Stuart Harshaw (Chair), Damola Adamolekun, Marcelo Kim, and Stephen Lang

The Board has a standing Technical Committee of four members. As set out in its written charter, the overall purpose of the Technical Committee is to assist the Board in reviewing technical matters related to project design and operations as well as fulfilling the Board’s oversight responsibilities with respect to the Board’s and the Company’s continuing commitment to improving the environment and ensuring that activities are carried out and facilities are operated and maintained in a safe and environmentally sound manner that reflects the ideals and principles of sustainable development. The Technical Committee charter is available on the Company’s website at www.ithmines.com. The Technical Committee will review technical materials prepared by management of the Company and will monitor, review and provide oversight with respect to the Company’s policies, standards, accountabilities and programs relative to health, safety, and environmental-related matters.

Board and Committee Meetings

The Board held five meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 (“Fiscal Year 2019”). Each director attended, in person or by telephone, 100% of the aggregate number of actual meetings held by the Board and by the committees of the Board on which he or she served during Fiscal Year 2019. It is the Company’s policy that each director attends each annual meeting of the Company’s shareholders, either in person or by telephone. All of the then incumbent Directors attended the annual meeting in Fiscal Year 2019. The attendance record of each director at full Board meetings, and at meetings of any Board committees of which the applicable director is a member for the Fiscal Year 2019 are as follows: